skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
1. They haven't disclosed anything of use to an attacker.

2. According to the post, Hive responded and said the issues had been fixed. Obviously they haven't, and at this point OP seems to have decided that the most responsible thing to do was to warn users of the platform that they aren't safe.

I don't really see a problem with this.
So again, how does an option to open the device affect you in any way?
Seasonal Hurricane Forecast Bust
It's an English term for Latinos that non-Latinos in the U.S. use to signal inclusiveness (usually gender inclusiveness these days, but its history includes some LGBT inclusiveness as well). You see it a lot in corporate emails about awareness and sometimes in colleges and academia. It's mildly disliked by several parts of the political spectrum for a surprisingly diverse number of reasons, but it's generally well meaning. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latinx.
Who knows why you're being downvoted, and I'd say it's _more_ well known than GIMP.

My sister has used Photopea. She's as far from a sophisticated computer user as you can get. Regular people can stumble across Photopea, they certainly don't know about GIMP.
Hard to say, Apple never gave them a chance.
Does your sync setup work in realtime in the background? Earlier this year I was evaluating iOS devices and a showstopper was the apparent inability to have keepass database updates push-synced: the closest I got was a scheduled copy of the file at a given time daily, but my nightmare was making a change on one device, needing that change on the iOS device, having it not be there, and not having network to go fetch it. It'd be neat if you've got a way to make this work more like Syncthing on Android.
I just bought Strongbox Pro just a couple of minutes ago. It's much nicer than KyPass. It's a bit pricey, but worth it if you can afford it.
https://www.dictionary.com/e/latine-vs-latinx/
> Stop buying Apple if you don't like it.

I personally don't like it and will not stop buying apple phones. The CPU's on an iPhone are far ahead of Android. I could buy either the Pixel 4 or the iPhone 11 for the same $450 price a month after launch from my carrier.

single-thread geekbench:
iPhone 11 (September 2019): 1311
Pixel 4 (October 2019): 662
Pixel 7 (October 2022): 1058

The geekbench for the Pixel 7 is 1051 single thread... still slower than my three year old phone.

Android needs to have better CPU's for me to consider it.
Just in case you aren't self-aware: On one hand you are lauding Matt Levine's coverage (he has been very clear not to accuse SBF of fraud yet); on the other hand you seem to be angry that other publications aren't accusing SBF of fraud.
> In fact, most of the things shown in those demos can be done today

That's not a coincidence, as modern OSs were inspired by those demos. But isn't it a sign of a lack of progress the fact that the pinnacle of modern technology is the fact we can do the same things shown 50 years ago _slightly better_?

Why haven't there been equally revolutionizing ideas in HCI since then? We have better screens on smaller computers, perfected tapping on glass and haptic feedback, but what we can do with all this technology is awfully limiting.

Add to that the invasion of advertising in every facet of computing, perversing incentives for companies to develop technology that benefit humanity instead of exploiting it, and in many ways we've regressed.

XR seems to be the next step forward (itself not a novel idea either), but so far it seems that it will be ruled by the current tech giants, which is far from enticing.
Those numbers are global. In certain markets, like the U.S., that number is likely to be very much skewed towards iOS. Even if you look at the global numbers, iOS was responsible for 75% of app revenue once games are excluded, and 78% of subscription revenue in 2021.

https://www.businessofapps.com/data/app-revenues/
Can’t agree more. I generally forgive journalists who simply reporting on a story and get it very wrong because they usually report all kind of stories and it’s unreasonable to expect good grip on all the topics.

On the other hand, when a journalist follows a story, they must have good high level understanding. Shockingly, youtubers have much better grip on the situation.

The traditional media seems to be losing the plot in this FTX and presenting SBF in strangely positive light, almost as if it is a human interest story.

The talk with him today was very strange.
Lest best list I've found so far is pretty light: https://mikepope.com/blog/AddComment.aspx?blogid=2354
Amazon promotes and encourages this type of garbage as it sells more product. Business as usual
Yet some school cultures are entrenched, and extend from the broader community. If people are taught from everywhere else that bearing witness is dangerous then groups of bullies will have free reign. Changing that culture can be like pushing a rock up hill.

Solutions may have to be drastic, like electronic surveillance or sending troublemakers to different schools.
Wow! I really like this project. I have been loving actor systems, and your project brings a lot of interesting concepts together.

I do not have much of anything to say, but I did come up with an idea. One thing that Fuchsia (operating system) does is that parents are able to lock down the permissions when spawning childs. For example, if a child is spawned with no I/O permissions, that child will have all those permissions removed, and any child that spawns from that will have the same restraints.

Could Lunatic support something like this on the far future?

EDIT: I just read the FAQ and looks to be heading that way. Awesome.
Hive is a My First App project from a teen who taught herself to code in 2019 (https://www.hivesocial.app/about-us).

Caveat emptor.
Wow thanks! I’m going to set it up with my wife and see if it passes the “don’t need to be a nerd” test. :)

Edit: there’s nothing to set up. Despite what the TLD might imply, there is no app. It. Just. Works. Remind me to complain more about things that have historically sucked.
When the parent is externalizing the cost of their pacifism onto their child, they are engaging in moral failure.
>I left off "exerting social pressure" because I felt it was redundant to "expressing disapproval".

It isn't the same at all. It is "a way of [a] expressing disapproval and [b] exerting social pressure. One can express disapproval without the express intent of exerting social pressure. That is, the outcome may exert social pressure but the point is to have your voice be heard, not shut the other person down.

>Let's go back to the example I mentioned in my first comment.

Ok:

>Should I not have the freedom to organize a protest of my local theater for hosting a controversial figure that I think is worthy of cancellation?

>You have complete freedom to do that, but it doesn't mean you should or shouldn't. That's what GP is saying. And cancellation can be over extremely petty or unfounded things. Obviously there is a line but people have taken a "cancel first, ask questions later" approach, and over increasingly petty reasons. One can advocate against that without being against free speech, which means that the government cannot make speech illegal.

Well, what is the purpose of the protest? If it is to make your disaproval known, then it is not an attempt of cancelation. If, as you have clarified, you intent is to exert social pressure to scilence them, then you are trying to both cancel and censor them.

In any case, that doesn't make disagreement of opinions in general censorship, as you have claimed:

>GP arguing that people shouldn't cancel people is a form of censorship

Are we both censoring each other now? Or are we having a discusion?

>I don't know how or why you are separating that one action into distinct categories of speech.

exercising my free speech: (almost) any speech falls under this category.

expressing disapproval: GP expressing disaproval of cancel culture

exerting social pressure: When as a part of "mass canceling" an atempt is made to censor someone.

To recap:

1. Having an opinion is not censorship.

2. acknowlegment of freedom of speech legaly is not the same as an endorcment of said speech.

3. Being against what people do is not a demand that their free speech be taken away legaly.

Therefore:

"Comments like yours seems to reveal a lack of a consistent principle underlying your argument. Instead, you seem to be defining free speech as some narrow window of speech that you agree with and speech outside that isn't worth protecting."

Is wrong.

4. Exterting social pressure isn't always a bad thing and is some times needed. When it is simply used as a weapon to shut down non-dangerous people you disagree with it has usualy gone too far.

These can all be true at the same time
I have a 2 year old desktop apple computer and GIMP gets about 2 fps for simple tasks like using the pencil to draw. (maybe it's better on linux or PC)
So why do you think Apple doesn't want that to happen?

Surely a developer or ten has suggested the same thing by now?

My guess is focus: they are 100% focused on being the best closed platform that is easy to use and everything is handled for the user. A lively sideloading and 3rd party homebrew scene would be a massive distraction for the Dev team and most importantly the support side with little direct business ROI (indirect could be big but a harder sell).

Possibly harming brand reputation showing people what they could have absent the paid wall. When the alternative exposes people to risk, and they'd rather not have to explain themselves?
Which apps require you giving 30% to apple or Google?
Why go through all that trouble? The passwords database or storage in 1Password is encrypted. It is only ever decrypted on a local device.
At the same time, Coindesk.com front page includes this:

https://www.coindesk.com/layer2/2022/11/30/a-self-regulatory...

> A Self-Regulatory Organization Is the Best Way to Advance Crypto While Protecting the Public

> The financial industry, collectively, has greater domain expertise than can be expected of regulators. This reality invites transparent, fully accountable, self-regulation.

I'd think anyone could see that it's virtually all scams atop schemes atop scams, and find grounds to shut it all down.

Of course people who would like to run these scams and schemes would like to self-regulate it.
> You think Sequoia, Ontario Teachers Pension Fund, and a ton of other legitimate investors were "participating in an obvious pump-and-dump scam"?

Yes.
He's already fuxx0red so getting in front of the media and trying to humanize himself while controlling the public interpretation of what happened is perhaps the only way to avoid getting continually pilloried. I think this is a thought-out move...his parents are law professors. It's not a Shia LaBeouf type of self-flagellation, I don't think.

One thing I learned from the Martin Shkreli saga is that, if the people hate you enough for something atrocious that is technically lawful, the government will poke holes in you until they find something not-atrocious that is clearly unlawful. There's probably value in winning the public over, even if they don't technically have a say in the legal proceedings.
Here's the NYT article.[1]

It was an remote interview with Bankman-Fried.
The reporter (interviewer?) was David Yaffe-Bellany.[2] He came from Bloomberg.

When, as a reporter for a major paper, do you call a CEO a crook? That's a tough call.
Especially when the CEO is in total denial at the time. Especially when such an article will crash what's left of the company. I wonder what discussions took place within the NYT editorial staff.

The interview was on Sunday, Nov. 13. The Binance buyout deal was supposedly happening as of Nov. 8, Binance was making backout noises on Nov 9th, and the deal was dead by Thursday Nov. 10. There was still talk of other deals past that point.

It wasn't clear as of Nov. 14th that there had been out and out theft. The hard info on that came later. Take a close look at who knew what when.

[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/14/technology/ftx-sam-bankma...

[2] https://yaffebellany.com/
No idea what they are talking about, or why they feel the need to withhold information, but a quick search turned up this interesting comment:

https://www.reddit.com/r/1Password/comments/lkfg5p/what_happ...
Three really awesome responses that got me thinking, so I’ll just reply to myself…

I own a Quest which mostly my son uses for games and loves, and I occasionally game on. It’s cool. It’s also a toy I would never try to use for work.

I can imagine a VR/AR technology that is world changing. It’s hard to say if it’s technologically and physically possible to implement ever or if it’s just fantasy. It’s also really hard to know exactly how far away we are from a toy to something that makes a very large number of workers significantly more productive.

I’ll say this, in a world where a lot of work is being done remotely, it seems to me that VR could be a powerful game changer with the right hardware and the right UI for company and team cohesion, feeling connected to peers, and collaboration.

Some day I am certain we will look back at Zoom-style telepresence and laugh at how quaint it is.

I don’t think we’ll ever spend 8 hours straight every day in VR, unless you’re the rare employee spending their entire day in meetings. I do think dropping into VR spaces for certain types of work throughout the day could become “a thing” and I don’t think we are actually that far off.

Facebook’s mistake was thinking they could spend billions to leap ahead to the goal, while simultaneously not being able to communicate to even their own employees that goal and why it’s meaningful.

I think there are generational advancements that take time to happen no matter how many people are “working” on it.

I also tend to think as a team goes from 100 people to 10,000 the other 9,900 are just making work not doing work, unless you can split up the problem into extremely well defined components that will end up snapping together properly and run them as 100 separate skunk-work projects.

Fundamentally, a cartoon world doesn’t help me get work done. But I can imagine customer support, content moderation, traffic control, all the real-time kind of twitch-based jobs out there could probably design an immersive VR interface which is a lot more efficient and fun to work inside than a desktop environment.

So many real-world tasks that a wearable AR screen could potentially assist with, whether it’s learning how to fix something around the house, or learning a hobby.

I recently learned to scuba dive and got my PADI cert but definitely still have a lot to learn. Could I one day put on a BCd (the diving vest) and a pair of VR goggles and do immersive training courses, or preview a dive?

I am learning guitar, I could imagine VR or AR goggles helping me get better but it would require a lot of custom software and UX.

I also like the idea of being able to put on the goggles and connecting with an expert that sees what you see and is in your ear waking you thru something, for times when software alone doesn’t cut it.

I just can’t help but believe there’s huge value to be unlocked and better ways to communicate, collaborate, and entertain and that we just need to cross a usability and ergonomics threshold which isn’t too far off and people will actually start getting comfortable and engaged in these settings.
Bonds were invented in the 500 year timespan you’ve given. It’s a pretty hyperbolic claim lol
‘Shark Tank’ Startup Is Making Vegan Bacon Out of Seaweed
Is there a web UI ? If yes - I guess an attacker can just send "bad" JS to the client and steal the master password no? Or inject a malicious update. Most people probably have auto updates?
It seems like a potential way to derail criticism coming from Republicans, doesn't it? Or perhaps make them look shady- this guy is an adept social engineer, after all
Papa John's in my area transparently subs delivery out to doordash now, and the experience is terrible. The drivers don't get tips (unless I happen to have cash, which I never do) and the pizzas arrive cold (presumably because they're trying to batch a lot of pizzas up in a single trip). I've given up on it.
> Youtube recently tested randomly lowering people's video resolution to see who changed it back to gauge the importance of the resolution to their customers.

I wish they start gauging how frustrating such tests are, particularly for the test group. I've been cursing at YouTube many times over the past weeks because of this very issue - and now I learn it's not even a bug, but an A/B test.
Any way to run Fly with multiple locations at the same time? For context, I want to build a simple uptime service which tells me when my website is down, but for that I don't want to use a single VPS, I want to load balance between several locations and servers in case any one of them goes down.

Am I supposed to be looking for serverless deployment? Deploy a master/parent version of the app on one main VPS then several sub versions on other VPSes distributed around?
Am I reading this right? They basically are trying to measure sleep quality and whether or not they have depression based on some random questions? Sleep quality and depression are no where near my concerns. My wife (who gives piano lessons) recently had a student (13yo girl) that for over a year was sending naked photos of herself to an account on instagram that was supposed to be the secret "true fans only" account of Justin Bieber (or some other popular singer). Can't remember how her parents found out, but they took her to the police department to let them handle it (they did nothing). My wife told her she should be more careful. Her only response was "Yea.. but what if it was really Justin?".
> if you're satisfied with first and second factor living in the same spot

It’s no longer “2FA” then.
I really want this to happen, and I hope Apple is forced to make it happen — a fairly likely scenario in the EU I think — but if they do allow side-loading I fear they will disable all sorts of Apple services when you flip that switch.

No more Apple Pay, for starters. Maybe no iMessage. Things where they can argue they have to turn them off to protect the user, and/or themselves, from rogue apps.

And then you could have a kind of freedom, but it wouldn’t be a very useful one. You can already load whatever you want on your own phone if you have the source and do the build yourself. I can pretty easily imagine Apple making it so you can side load closed apps but almost nobody ever does.
They've done all that stuff and more (including seizing their boats) for Russian oligarchs and it hasn't changed anything. In fact, a bunch of those oligarchs have committed suicide as a result, frequently by shooting themselves in the backs of their heads and then jumping out of windwos.
Why are we talking about government apps?
If you're going to make a claim like "'the blank slate' conception of the world continues to mislead us", it wouldn't hurt to have more than a series of what-ifs.
> 1. No need to beat a man while he is down.

A man who is still kicking isn't really down. No need to talk bad about a person who left silently, but anyone who kicks up a fuzz should expect people to respond if they disagree with the fuzz.
This is very cool! I hope this code get supporting in Unity / Godot and better still gets some (financial) love too.
TLDR: Mastodon is more secure than Hive Social
I'm not sure about TLC and QLC, but SLC and MLC seems very good so far.
SpaceX accused of age discrimination by former employee
Not surprising, most IPOs that have come to the market in the last few years are startups that have long since been anything but, and have all their value already extracted, and then the IPO happens to see how many broader investors they can rip off.
How can Apple have "too much power" here, when there is a clear alternative where it is cheaper?
But didn't another study conclude that giving kids mobile at early age makes their eyes don't grow well with their eye being short sighted easily?

I mean it makes sense. I used to run around outside and play sports through my vacations. Current generation for the majority are looking at screens and are indoors.

Isn't that an disadvantage for the kid and hence linked to their well being?
(For the benefit of those who did not get the joke: a logarithm is a homomorphism from ‘*’ to ‘+’.)
Sure. Personally I’ve never heard of the Hive you’re talking about. Perhaps it was the same for the reporter.
Any plans to publish raw examples or highlights of convos? This is good journalism material
Show HN: I am building a Safari Web Extension to switch tabs efficiently
I like the tab-switching behaviour in Chrome/Firefox and wanted Safari to have something similar. Another wish of mine was for it to be a web extension that feels native to the browser vs an app extension that looks out of place.

After waiting long enough, I decided to build one myself. A little preview of Tap Tab - https://taptab.manibatra.xyz. The web extension APIs for managing tabs are pretty locked down in Safari, but I have already found a lot of value in using the extension. Some of the features that I find very useful(in the middle of building a few of these) :

- Driven by keyboard shortcuts. I can see the tabs I have open at a glance and switch between them.

- Fuzzy search to quickly filter down to the tab you want.

- Quick switching between two tabs.

- Ability to pin, mute, and close the tab right from the extension.

Say hello, and tell me what features you would like the extension to have!! You can follow the updates on Twitter- https://twitter.com/ManiBatra23.
Curb / Kerb
One thing that's incredibly frustrating is search engines often like to send people to really old versions of docs. I wonder if that was the cause?
TLDR: Mastodon is more secure than Hive Social.
> Category theory is literally the mathematics of boxes (objects), arrows (morphisms), and composition.

As I've learned more about category theory (and its applications), I've found string diagrams to be a really nice tool. But string diagrams flip the above around -- morphisms are boxes, and objects are wires. A wire is just a point-to-point link; it doesn't do anything on its own, it just connects a port of one type with a matching port on another site. It's the graphical realization of the composition operation itself.

Meanwhile, morphisms are the things that actually have behavior and real identities, so we draw them as boxes with inputs and outputs and give them names. This lines up with my understanding that in category theory, it's the morphisms that matter; the objects are no more than labels governing how you can stick the morphisms together. You may as well call the morphisms "widgets" or "components", and call the objects "interfaces", because that's literally correct.

This ends up really nice in the context of distributed systems, where concurrency gives you a monoidal category. In string diagrams, concurrently is quite literally the result of putting two diagrams side-by-side, rather than connecting them end-to-end. It's lovely, and some of the research I'm doing right now is actually founded on formalizing the message-passing causal diagrams distsys researchers and practitioners use every day, and using them as a vehicle for building programs that are more amenable to being proven correct. (Distributed systems are hard to verify for both humans and computers; I'd like to think that what I'm doing will be just as good for giving human practitioners a good framework for convincing themselves their code is correct -- or better, making bugs more obvious.)
> but voluntarily take responsibility in some meaningful way

Nobody seems to be able to explain what they think this looks like. "You'll know it when you see it"?
Oddly the analogous change isn't applied to filipino/filipina
So, not disclosure from a security ops / policy perspective, but it is 'disclosure' this the equivalent of a 'here be dragons' comment on a map ... an endorsement for the 'curious'