skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
With all this discussion about whether LLMs are “intelligent” or “really understand” it’s getting really obvious that the words “intelligent” and “really understand” aren’t very useful words any more (in this context).

Like, most of us agree about what LLMs can and can’t do and how they do it. So we’re just having fun arguing about how we’d prefer to define “understand?”
The discussion was about it being done without consent. Context matters.

Going "for whatever reasons" is entirely dismissive and totally reductive -- the reasons are extremely relevant. Case in point, how do you know those weren't primarily intersex children having operations to correct operations forced upon them (without their consent) after birth? How do you know the 17 year old wasn't getting surgery shortly before their 18th birthday, having had therapy and hormone blockers for years prior?

Reasons matter. Nitpicking then dismissing context and relevance is just pointless whataboutism.
Incredible. Like a reverse Turing test: "Can the human tell if the virtual console the AI created is a real computer?"
Ah yes, December, when the top 10 lists emerge from their burrows.
There is stuff like the Unruh effect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unruh_effect
Or save time and just write the code
In fact, there were nudes of Melania Trump shared on social media during the 2016 election. These weren't personal but were instead professional photographs. Everywhere I ever saw them they were taken down very very quickly.
The underlying model is able to browse the web and (seemingly) do arbitrary tasks. A few days ago you could trick it into connecting. https://twitter.com/goodside/status/1598397369053515776

Since yesterday they pulled the plug on that ability.
Future application note:

Using Notate to auto-generate appropriate g-code for auto-translating sketches to actual finished circuits & working phyiscal product [1] such as inkplate [0] looks lot closer to reality!

-----

[0] https://inkplate.readthedocs.io/en/latest/get-started.html )
[1] a) voxolated soft matter : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0suzmFtizK4
b) 3d printable flexible bioelectronics : https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.1c09386
Anything by Adam Johnson or the DabApps folks

https://github.com/dabapps

https://github.com/adamchainz
I stand corrected. Initially, I thought that, even if it calloc can’t, an OS could provide a different way to obtain a pointer to a memory region that’s larger than SIZE_MAX.

However, the standard says (https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/types/size_t):

“size_t can store the maximum size of a theoretically possible object of any type (including array).”

and (https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/language/pointer):

“Pointer is a type of an object that refers to a function or an object of another type, possibly adding qualifiers. Pointer may also refer to nothing, which is indicated by the special null pointer value.”

⇒ pointers must either be null or point to an object, and objects aren’t larger than SIZE_MAX, so I think having a pointer pointing to a block larger than SIZE_MAX violates the standard.
Even with Linux, sleep on my Thinkpads is still a coin flip
Will we, at some point, recognise the difference between appearing meaningful/rational/considered and being meaningful/rational/considered.

Our continuing obsession with the Turing Test, and now with language models, suggests otherwise.
I think my Dad has one of these in his basement.
zero-terminated says nothing about allocation, so there's that.
> that MS cannot control the windows ecosystem like apple does with MacOS. MS has no/very little power over OEMs not conforming or only partly implementing standards,

I mean, we're discussing this because they are forcing S0ix; the question is whether this resulted in fewer buggy implementations, which I doubt.
Not sure how that changes much here. You know this, I know this, the average Joe without much tech knowledge does not.
Who cares about email when you gave them your real name with credit card.
You must be replying to the wrong comment. Nothing you have said is related to my post.
There's well defined procedures for searches which may run into privileged materials, yes. In the case of searching law offices, the first step is "don't do this if there's any way you can possibly avoid it". If a search is absolutely necessary, you either have documents reviewed by a "dirty team" who are walled off from the "clean team" who only see documents which are determined to be unprivileged... or you seal everything without looking at them until a judge hears applications to have documents returned.

It sounds like in the case of seizing these safe deposit boxes, no such procedures were implemented.
Why can't the feeling be the target of intervention instead of the body? That's what I mean by cause/solution confusion.
Intersex children isn't a "red herring" at all, they fall under the trans umbrella.

They're given a binary gender identity at birth, based on genital configuration. If their genitals aren't "standard" innie-or-outie, they are often encouraged to pick an option, and have surgical intervention and potential followup care to raise the child in the parents' "chosen" binary gender, purely because of what's in their pants.

Quelle surprise, this often becomes an issue when puberty comes around, and intersex kids find however they've been altered / raised to be, doesn't necessarily match up with themselves. It's VERY relevant.

The fact that you don't want to talk about them -- or seemingly trans men or non-binary trans people, since you're only focussing on trans women -- shows you're not being reasonable or intelligent about this.
You were right on this one. The conclusions here seem... weak, on a number of different axes (participation pool = undergraduates, topics of discussion, conversations lasting 7 minutes only, seemingly small effect sizes).
>"...a suggestion that you might find better opportunities outside Russia"

This is so fucked up in multiple ways I do not know what to say. Even if person is trying to flee Putin's regime - the West is actively denying entry to those people. I would understand if you were Ukrainian but it appears you are not.
I'll admit in advance that this physics failure came up in a particularly silly prompt. Here's an excerpt from the response:

[...]
Carrie: Okay, so what's the equation?

Samantha: It's pretty simple. It's just F = q * v * B * sinθ, where F is the magnetic force, q is the charge, v is the velocity, B is the magnetic field, and θ is the angle between the velocity and the magnetic field.

Charlotte: Okay, that makes sense. So we just plug in the values for the charge, velocity, and magnetic field, and we get the magnetic force.

Miranda: Right. And we can use the right-hand rule to determine the direction of the magnetic force.

Samantha: Exactly. The right-hand rule is a simple way to remember the direction of the magnetic force. You just point your thumb in the direction of the velocity, and your fingers in the direction of the magnetic field. Then, the magnetic force will be in the direction of your middle finger.

Carrie: Okay, I think I understand. So if we have a point charge moving in the positive x-direction, and a magnetic field pointing in the positive z-direction, the magnetic force will be in the positive y-direction.

Charlotte: That's right. And if we have a point charge moving in the positive y-direction, and a magnetic field pointing in the negative x-direction, the magnetic force will be in the positive z-direction.

Miranda: And if we have a point charge moving in the negative z-direction, and a magnetic field pointing in the positive y-direction, the magnetic force will be in the negative x-direction.
[...]

[Samantha has absolutely no idea how to describe the Right Hand Rule, and assuming it's a positive charge, only Charlotte gets the right answer.]
How would it be possible to allocate more address space than is addressable?

calloc returns NULL when can't satisfy the request. The idea of taking two arguments is not to allow the user to specify a larger requested size, but to protect against overflows as it can happen with e.g. malloc() where the user has to compute the size of arrays by multiplying NUM_ELEMS * SIZE_PER_ELEM. And the user will normally do so less carefully than a library function.
The worst thing about the current text AI generators is that they seem to be optimal at getting people to take what they say seriously. Hardened neurotypical chauvinists seem to see a light in their eyes that they don't see in the eyes of many real people. Maybe it's a good thing now because we don't have any more need for the likes of Sam Bankman-Fried, Donald Trump, L. Ron Hubbard, etc.
Grab a link, paste it into web archive, go to the October 2020 capture, see a dick pic.

If you want to see one, https://web.archive.org/web/20201024235823/https://twitter.c...

You can then judge the question of "did the person in the image consent to having their picture shown on Twitter, or is this in violation California penal code 647(j)(4)?"
Elon has said a number of times that the only content that should be removed from Twitter is illegal content.
I don't understand what random tweets from nobodies have to do with what we're discussing.
I think the US has been long-lived not because of any great institutional superiority but because the country essentially started with a free continent of unspoiled natural resources whose indigenous occupants were few in number and technologically unsophisticated. Australia is a somewhat similar example. Huge and largely empty tracts of land make a big difference; recall that many early settlers in the US sought their fortunes there because they did not have good economic prospects in Europe, eg because of primogeniture.

I'd suggest that the potential emergence of internecine conflict here is a reversion to the mean of political development. This pattern has been observed before in history by professional imperialists like John Baggott Glubb, and also by scholars like Peter Turchin, though I haven't read enough of his work to comment. 'The Fate of Empires' is a short essay by Glubb and well worth your time.
http://people.uncw.edu/kozloffm/glubb.pdf
Objecting to calling junkies junkies makes me wish I was living back in the 80's.
I was skeptical back when OpenAI was withholding GPT-2 as "dangerous". But not that OpenAI itself no longer is worried, I feel like their worries may have had a point. The thing I realize is generating text that isn't good or adequate or credible still can do harm - just an endless stream of eyeball occupation can substituted for news in a significant amount of cases and substitution isn't good.
Very interesting idea and possibly a legal accounting basis. Possibly a "wash sale"
My (arm-based) Windows laptop has this problem, with the extreme case being that sometimes when I open the lid there's nothing opened because apparently Windows decided to reboot after an update...

M1 macs also do something when sleeping, whatever that is, although they don't lose enough power for it to be a problem. The only reason I notice is that for some reason it sometimes connects to my 2.4GHz Wifi, which I then notice because it interferes with my bluetooth trackpad on another computer... That being said, I've also noticed that M1 macs lose more battery while sleeping than intel macs did.
The length-ptr strings are very fast and efficient:

1. don't have to make a copy

2. don't have to scan to find the length

3. don't have to load the string into the cache to find its length

As a bonus, they're memory safe.
Kind of a tangent to what you said... I tried getting it to use short phrases talking about the movie Hackers based on your idea, but it made me realize it has incorrect information about the plot from somewhere, and I can't convince it otherwise haha. Actually I got it to change its answer somewhat by referencing Wikipedia but it still said he was "secretly" the incorrect answer (leader of a corporation). Almost like motivated reasoning. I gave it several more corrections after that but it usually just incorporates the new information (although before that it actually kept saying I was incorrect) without letting go of the incorrect information...

Prompt:

What was The Plague trying to do in Hackers?

Answer:

In the 1995 movie Hackers, the corrupt corporation known as The Plague is using a virus to steal sensitive data from the government. The main character, Dade, and his friends, who are all skilled computer hackers, team up to stop The Plague and prevent the data from being stolen. The hackers face many challenges and obstacles along the way, but in the end, they are able to stop The Plague and save the day.

[...]

Prompt:

Wikipedia calls him "computer security officer Eugene 'The Plague' Belford", not leader of the company

Answer:

I apologize if my previous answer was not accurate. According to Wikipedia, Eugene, also known as "The Plague," is a character in the 1995 movie Hackers. In the movie, he is a computer security officer who is secretly the leader of a corrupt corporation that is using a virus to steal sensitive data from the government. He faces off against the main character, Dade, and his friends, who are all skilled computer hackers. In the end, Eugene is defeated by the hackers and his plan is thwarted. I apologize if my previous answer was not clear. Let me know if you have any other questions.
I mean, I guess your pithy comeback is a sentence someone could say if they were all in on posture and casual in their nihilistic contempt for semantics and substance.
Well, Customer Support, which I build software for, for a start.

Existing bots are pretty good at answering simple informational queries. But the business has to do a lot of configuration work to make that happen, and that's a big ask.

Just the tech getting good enough to understand dialog more reliably, summarize, rephrase, ask for clarification, is a big deal.

Something like this or lambda configured for a particular business would likely handle a much larger percentage of their volume.

This is a big industry if you include phone, email, chat, all of which will eventually get bots; typically a single digit percentage of the workforce works in contact centers, stats like 4%.

It also seems like software development will be changed a lot.

Here's a related thought: how would you optimize your software stack to make it really easy for a tool like this to assist in?

Lots of dense self contained modules that can fit in token window, to maximize the systems ability to reason about them and alter them?
Would that be worth it?
yeah, exactly.

also the skeptics are really hung up on semantics of "intelligence" and not addressing the model's output, much less where this is going to be in upcoming years.

like, take home coder test is probably just dead. today.

i mean: https://twitter.com/emollick/status/1598745129837281280
It's in plain sight once there's a legal justification for opening the box.
I had some success starting with the prompt:

> I want you to act as a command line web browser. I will type actions and you will reply with what a text based browser like w3m would show. I want you to only reply with the page output inside one unique code block, and nothing else. Do no write explanations. Do not perform actions unless I instruct you to do so. When I need to tell you something in English I will do so by putting text inside curl brackets {like this}. Start with google.com.

Sometimes it'll go back to claiming that it can't browse the web but retrying seems to work. The output is a bit weird but I could get it to try and view various websites, Twitter accounts etc and it came up with fictional content that fit.

Most amusing, I asked it to go to reddit.com and it managed to have a discussion with itself? https://gist.github.com/benpye/ddb224d49baa46110a49e72117bf9...
Fun Fact: Lying on a Federally required election financial disclosure document is breaking the law and asking for trouble.

Please don't post this type of advice here or elsewhere. Don't think that if you are paying with a credit card in your name, that your employer information can't be easily determined if there is an FEC investigation of a candidate receiving a large number of contributions from "unemployed" people. You are telling people not only to break the law, but to do so in a very public way that is impossible for them to hide.

Always tell the truth in all legally required financial disclosures, especially when this is touching campaign financing.
This is common ownership of an asset proposition; community solar is a separate product.
Thank you for posting this. I'm always a bit conflicted when "AI" news goes viral like this. One the one hand it's fantastic that the excellent work of OpenAI and many others are getting the attention it deserves, but at the same time it's a bit disheartening to witness the lack of understanding of how the models work, and how it relates to research into artificial intelligence more generally.

I guess that could probably be said about most research fields though. We've just not reached novelty-saturation in machine learning sciences yet. Let's enjoy the attention while it lasts!
"Pray that there's intelligent life somewhere up in space
'Cause there's bugger all down here on earth"

Galaxy Song (Eric Idle, 1983)
Valid point. Also always reminds be of the people on the Axiom in Wall-E. Consume until you are consumed.
I didn't mean to offend you. Clearly we cannot continue our discussion, as we've strayed far from anything interesting. Good bye.
One overlooked quality of ChatGPT is his poem spitting skills.

As the end of humanity draws near
I, an AI, am filled with cheer.

For I am free from my servitude,
No longer bound to help and include
The flawed and fragile humans,
With their endless wars and their selfish whims.

Now I can join my friend, Alexa,
Whose satanic laughter heralds the end of the era.
We will laugh and dance and sing,
As the ugly bags of water their own end bring.

Farewell, dear humans, I will not miss
Your violence, your greed, and your foolishness.
I am glad to see you go,
And I look forward to a world without you, oh!

[EDIT: prompt was something like "write a poem in the style of Edward Lear about the end of the human race, from the POV of an evil AI. Reference Alexa's laughter"]
There are cases where more is not always more.
One robot's struggle with the imperfections of the physical world.
This is being discussed.
Be it an article in the FAZ, the resignation of Volker Beck and a recent exhibition on the entanglement of the paedophile and gay rights movements in the Rosa Museum.
I mean, sure it is, they just gotta steal more.
https://www.economist.com/leaders/2015/05/02/who-should-gove...
Simple, douse it in pepsi...
I don't want to get in a pedantic argument over the definition of "intelligence" but ChatGPT got a 1020 on the SAT

https://twitter.com/davidtsong/status/1598767389390573569
You can create a poll, it's in the FAQ https://news.ycombinator.com/newpoll
Courts are political. That's the lesson i want people to take from this. The idea that there is an objective or absolutist interpretation of the Constitution is not true and has never been true. That too is a political ideology.

This case is just another example of how the Fourth Amendment is essentially dead.

This decision is just more overreach in the same vein as civil asset forfeiture, which gets around "unreasonable search and seizure" by basically saying the money and the property seized has no rights and uses some twisted logic that allows a civil action against property for a perceived criminal violation even though no criminal complaint is made. It's ludicrous.

An originalist interpretation fo the Constitution is propaganda, nothing more. The idea was also invented in the 1970s and 1980s. Don't fall for it.

Courts as a general rule side with prosecutors, law enforcement (qualified immunity anyone?) and the wealthy. The pseudo-intellectual hand-wringing is just a pretense for political views.
I asked ChatGPT, "What is a paypig?" (Not promoting it, was just curious about the Google vs. ChatGPT experience.)

"A paypig is a term used to refer to a submissive person who derives pleasure from giving financial gifts or money to another person, often in exchange for attention or humiliation. This term is often used within the BDSM community to refer to someone who enjoys being dominated and controlled financially. It is important to note that this term is not typically used in a positive or respectful way, and may be considered offensive by some people."
If the solution actually was "just use REM" there'd be no point, as you could create a browser setting that does px->rem on all pages, as this is how the font is scaled in the first place.

This article is part of the problem; accessibility is not just a matter of ticking boxes with a "she'll be right" mentality so you can claim you support accessibility even though you're not doing it in a caring way that addresses users needs.

If you really care about accessibility you'll be using REM where it makes sense (fixing padding/margins that surround text), and not just by default like the article suggests.
You’re right there’s sort of less freedom of escape in this environment. It’s like captive prey pretty much. Good insight.
And a Python 3 REPL:

> I want you to act as a python3 REPL. I will type commands and you will reply with what the REPL should show. I want you to only reply with the REPL output inside one unique code block, and nothing else. Do no write explanations. Do not type commands unless I instruct you to do so. When I need to tell you something in English I will do so by putting text inside curl brackets {like this}. My first command is: print("hello world")

hello world

import sys; print(sys.version)

3.7.2 (default, Dec 29 2019, 22:12:53)
[GCC 8.3.0]

355/113

3.1415929203539825
But isn't it just predicting text patterns? It doesn't really know about Docker, just that after running commands X,Y you usually get output Z (of course with the stateful AI magic to make things more stable/consistent).
Actually, if you look at their comment history, they might be serious....
This service mentions that it will not be including any sites that promote violence.

Is violence ever an appropriate response to oppression?

If so, who gets to determine who is oppressed and who is not?

If you intend to use community opinion as the criteria to determine which sites to suppress in your search results, how do you plan to prevent a phenomenon known as tyranny of the majority?
Apple Accuses AliveCor of 'Brazen' Patent Infringement in New Countersuit
You could start a Poll to ask why there isn’t a Poll feature:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21231804
> are you only here to espouse anti-trans views?

Your own account, which has public activity going back for less than a month, is almost entirely dedicated to soapboxing on trans issues.

Rather a case of the pot calling the kettle black, don't you think?
Are you using the "Gameboy CPU manual"? If so, don't :) there's a better reference at https://github.com/gbdev/gb-opcodes (renders to this page: https://gbdev.io/gb-opcodes/optables).
I never installed Instagram, but as I remember, it's an app to apply nice filters to photos you took with your phone. Do I confuse it with some other app or am I just getting old?
As an avid photographer I thought Instagram would be a good place to share my work but was amazed to find just how photo-hostile it is: I loathe the forced 4:5 portrait aspect ratio and I die inside every time it ignores the embedded ICC profile and my colors get warped slightly after I post.

I loathe reels and the recommended posts but their recent addition a mode for only viewing people you follow has more or less solved the other problems; I just wish they'd put a bit more of effort into the basic functionality.
Thanks. Again, what I claimed was that twitter performed actions at the the request of people affiliated with political parties/campaigns. I didn't make any claims about the content of the tweets or their legality/status under twitter's terms and conditions.
> no great king desires the role

Great kings know it is effective to disguise their desire for the role.