skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Exactly this. I filed an FCC complaint regarding speeds at my house and got Spectrum off their ass and investigating. Our neighborhood is a new build with fiber instead of coax that should be getting 500mbit upload on their Gig plan but not all houses receive it, mine included. Finally spoke to a local supervisor yesterday after going through first line support for over a week and he noticed that people even on the same node receive it while I'm stuck at 35mbit upload so that's progress and hopefully a catalyst for getting it resolved finally.

It just looks sad right now: https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/063d05b6-eae5-4534-99a3-f... -- that upload is pitiful for fiber.
The obvious answer is revenue. Most of tech is left. The more outrage the more clicks.

I don't think people realize how desperate these news orgs are.
That may be true, but your assertion that rinse aids have sulfates is incorrect. All the ones I've looked at have nonionic surfactants that are not sulfates.

(There are also sulfates that are aren't AES, such as sodium sulfate, which appears in many powdered dishwasher detergents. I doubt this has the same effect, so it's incorrect to just blame "sulfates".)

I think you need to learn the gloriously liberating feeling of admitting you were wrong.
Can you clarify what you mean about them attempting to apply their moderation policies to another website then? The rest of the context makes this appear as if you mean the NY Post...
no, that is not a difference that exists.
In the conspiracy community, wikipedia articles relevant to conspiracy theories often have extremely revealing edits and have been known as a source of checking for coverup for a while. The truth, I've found, is often so shocking that many if not most people, would rather reject it (attack the messenger, bury head in sand, etc) than admit their worldview has been so wrong for so long.

I've even seen sections in the edits go poof for very big stuff.
>I would say there’s a pretty big difference between 1:1 facial recognition for authenticating someone with their travel docs and 1:n facial recognition for dragnet surveillance.

In philosophy, that's distinction without a difference. Both cases are surveillance, period. You can argue one is more limited, but reality and human nature has shown over and over again that once information is collected and stored in a sufficiently performant manner, it will tend to grow to be cross-ref'd over time.
"Because I cannot think for myself therefore everybody cannot think for themselves."
Do you have citations for either of those claims?

Twitter definitely removed pornography which wasn’t labeled or which was posted without the consent of the people involved.

As for CSAM, whoever told you that is blatantly lying to you. There are annual reports showing thousands of reports to NCMEC and accounts getting banned - here’s last year:

https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/202...
Clerk Garden: a simple publishing space for Clerk notebooks
This was the first solution, submitted very quickly after the problem was published.
Wake me up when it comes up with a solution that passes an originality or plagiarism test.
Yes video codecs are great but in almost every case they need a GPU. This functions with no special hardware.
The only lossless option would be AV1 and that needs an Intel arc card or 4000 series Nvidia card.

You also have an inherent latency issue as you have to buffer 2-5 frames at 16ms a pop server side to encode the data.
The world in 10 years will be hard to believe for many of us. Only issue I see now is that the mindshare today is more towards computing. Materials science, robotics, biotech are lagging behind compared to the advances in computing.
For coding questions it does the same with methods on popular libraries! It's good at making a reasonable looking output and even picking the right libraries you'd need, but then just makes up a well-named-but-non-existent method. At first glance you're like wow that's amazing! Then you waste time finding out that this magic approach is impossible.
Just because he did abhorrent things does not make him not a socialist
I bought my mom a Chevy Bolt EV – Here’s how it went
> All it would take is someone saying "Wtf, my FB post calling Jacinda Ardern a pretty communist was mysteriously deleted."

The post saying that would also be deleted in that scenario.
I thought of Leto Atreides II in the 4th Dune book.

edit: not the op.
You are correct. There's no rate limit specified in the first amendment. Yes, many problems with free speech would be solved if there was. When first drafted, the physical limits were very different than today.

I think it would be a fun SciFi short story to write/read where there was a rate-limit clause added.
As with everything coming out of Russia, I don't know whether to believe this or not. Technical details seem ok, but the mechanism of picking courts and mayor's offices isn't explained.
It's a huge game with a big budget so it's reasonable to expect that every change is scrutinized and considered before release; it's got a huge player base with many of them very passionate, opinionated, and knowledgeable; it's a high-paced multiplayer FPS where your actions directly affect the success and enjoyment of other people; it has a history of camping; the franchise is currently facing criticisms over balancing issues in multiplayer; a common way for the industry to minimise criticism for DLC and microtransactions is to promise players that any items will be aesthetic only with no competitive advantage (no "pay-to-win").

Company releases DLC skin for $10 that provides competitive advantage to the most unsporting players, altering the game balance in a way that leads to many frustrating and unexpected games for their players, who have to swallow their pride and pull out their wallet to keep the playing field level. Company makes a lot of money.

That's why.
So it is a big do nothing like everything Elon has claimed his entire life.
What did you expect from a serial liar and bs artist.
Arrest and release, but that is expected in Minneapolis.
> What should we make of this apparent degradation?

Make it apparent. Oh, but in a way the author did.

Bad signals: «Even if it can get on our nerves sometimes»; «associations»; «positive»; «is seen»; «many will identify»; «we tend to use»; ... «redeem ... by making a clever joke ... that shows»; «to appear»; «the game» ...

The accusation of levity is circular, acted from a perspective firmly installed in levity.

Very little appears of any constructive consideration of the Point: we have to manage a World, we need well processed information, we had been since the dawn of time, playing is for spare time - and Stern is mostly playing.

--

> the medium’s stupidity

In spite of a number of faults, let us hold HN dear for the goods it offers.
good luck getting the same type of offering from vmware
I’ve had this skepticism until I started asking the bot to do things like “create a limerick using some words that have never existed before and then explain the definition of those words.”

I don’t believe the AI is generalized by any means. But I think it’s more than a Eliza-style parlour trick.

It does really well with facts but misses subjectivity and nuance. Like I ask it to write stories for Seinfeld or Raymond and it misses the tone and style entirely. But it gets all the names and other factual details right. I find it works incredibly well when you want things that are objective, like code or rhymes or comparisons of things.
They also have a good tutorial on installing it manually, for one of the cheaper droplets at $4 a month, or on Vultr at $3.50.

https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-inst...
I think this is the intended link

https://medium.com/@kfedvanilla/switching-from-software-engi...
So you can use a bazillion parameter AI model as an alternative to a web search index.
“ If Madoff got lucky and his portfolio doubled in a year, then he too would have been able to make customers whole.”

Maddoff didn’t have any portfolio since the late 80’s. So no trading, all fake records. Redemptions of principal and made up profits were paid with other customer funds.
What if I told you it’s impossible to get 100% clean financial data from anyone, including Bloomberg?
I expect the new Republican Congress will drag this out Benghazi-like for as long as they hold the majority, and it will become tiresome to all except congressional grandstanders and my late father who will somehow find a way to forward me emails about it from wherever his happy place is beyond the grave.
That's what I meant by "selectively enabled"
"Wired" is still around. I just renewed my subscription for $10. (I only subscribed about three years ago, when I got an offer to subscribe for $10.) You get the print magazine and unlimited web site access, plus some "subscriber-only" articles.

It's not all that technical; but, I find enough interesting content to justify $10/year.
Deno: NPM compatibility is stabilized in 1.28
Amazon’s Quest for the ‘Holy Grail’ of Robotics
That is only the all in one container solution geared to home server users.

The standard install uses no priv containers. https://www.kasmweb.com/downloads

I only mention the Linuxserver container because most Linux/Docker users do not want to pollute their base OS with stuff just to try it out.
Exactly, we have had the concept of "Libel" in uk law for over 700 years [0].

It's this Libel and Defamation law that has often contributed to the allegations of censorship. Fundamentally some of this is built into British culture, and is significantly different to US culture where "free speech" rules supreme. But it's the bleeding of US culture into that of the UK though the media+internet that leads to a more vocal debate around these issues than before.

To quote form the Wikipedia article below:

"English defamation law puts the burden of proof on the defendant, and does not require the plaintiff to prove falsehood. For that reason, it has been considered an impediment to free speech in much of the developed world."

The world is so much more connected now it's inevitable that cultural and legal differences will reduce and some sort of equilibrium will be found.

0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_defamation_law
These registers are only for legal entities (at least in Germany). And it has nothing to do with doing business.
Some interesting ones:

http://wikiwho.ailef.tech/diffs/c5885fe11dbfd31923f7554cf41c...

http://wikiwho.ailef.tech/diffs/c5885fe11dbfd31923f7554cf41c...

http://wikiwho.ailef.tech/diffs/ca44a9a42489ede43a5f58ccbd0d...
This is a stunning description of every technology hype cycle. Remember when everyone wanted to get in on VR development?
if Amazon is innocent then Alcapone and mafia bisses are innocent - after all they did have to get Alcapone for income tax evasion, therw was no proof that he ever personally killed or extorted anyone.

Amazon knows exactly whats is happening and they are profiting off it
You can check this by taking some time to create some specific weird puzzle that is unlikely to have been made in the format you come up with, then see if it can solve it. If you don't write it anywhere then it is being solved for the first time. Just make sure it is a pretty unusual puzzle.
Why to derive a new noun from the verb when there is the already perfect noun for that?

To the countrary noun-to-verb conversions makes much more sense.

I think it's a problem in English, where you can convert verb to noun and back to verb and back to noun, etc. etc.

to learn (v) -> [I'm] learning (v) -> learnings (n)

google (n) -> google [it] (v) -> [I'm] googling (v) -> [the process of] googling (n)
Yeah it can't solve novel questions. The AI couldn't do much to solve this one for example:

https://codeforces.com/contest/1672/problem/D

ChatGPT is just a very good copy/paste, not a logical problem solver(yet).
Block subsidiary cancels plans to trademark “Web5” after backlash
I know an amazing IC at a software company I once worked at that I still keep in touch with. He has extremely deep technical knowledge, which you can simply deduct from basically everyone in the company (even from other teams) coming to him for advice. He's been at the company for >10 years.

He has strong opinions on current processes and just getting things done.

This post resonated deeply with me, since I've discussed before with him his role and how it could evolve. I know for a fact that he dislikes lots of meeting and really likes working on the core product, and so far hasn't really jumped on the opportunity to go into management - he doesn't really want to be manager. So he is kind of exactly the guy the post is describing. The company is growing though and he is very slowly getting pushed by the head of development into a more managerial role..

Let's see how it works out. I believe he is going to be a great manager though.
You have to check out the malcontents who made edits to the USAF base at Alconbury:

http://wikiwho.ailef.tech/diffs/0db36f4f426c89e6fb7d41e00747...
The US Army has made six hundred contributions to a list of ethnic slurs:

http://wikiwho.ailef.tech/page/11014515

They appear as “PEO STAMIS” here, which appears to be an IT group?
KasmVNC is open source https://github.com/kasmtech/KasmVNC
I never knew to Google that before, thank you!
> that's no fun

Is there really any fun in solving problems that you could easily solve with an AI?
Thanks for the response, I didn't realize Eth had this ability. I was taking issue with the statement of the "key innovation of crypto is that it's supposed to reduce the risk of lending" which I don't think you are agreeing with.

It's not clear to me that increased liquidity would solve their problem. I'm not against DeFi, but the spectacular failures are proving that it's not nearly ready for prime time.
Your’re tiptoeing around the gravity of situations such as, “how some lawyers and doctors rigged a system to deny benefits to coal miners stricken with black lung disease, resulting in remedial legislative efforts.” [Pulitzer Prize winning investigation, 2014] I would hope that the people who are involved in uncovering actions like this don’t perceive their practice as a mere job or a hobby, relative to whether they’re paid for it.

In the scenario we’re discussing (a world without corporate media), people who truly care enough about events, plots and schemes that threaten the moral fiber, dignity, agency and safety of humanity will see to it that they’re uncovered. That is unless, all investigative journalists are frauds who are driven only by glory and gold.

What you’ve described would be “better”, sure. It would be “better” if it rained during a drought than if it didn’t. But what are people going to do in the meanwhile?

Is “corporate” media the only kind of media there is that can present the news either way?
> Even more puzzling is why China and other countries haven't adopted mRNA vaccines.

Why do you find this puzzling? What countries haven’t adopted mRNA vaccines and what do you mean by “adopted”?

> The J&J vaccine was pulled pretty early due to the clotting issues and AZ was not available in the US.

And Johnson&Johnson is still available now in the US. They pulled it out of an abundance of caution and because there were other vaccines on the market. If Johnson & Johnson was the only vaccine on the market it wouldn’t have been pulled because of the risk of clotting.

-edit-

This also doesn’t take into account risk analysis. Extreme likelihood of contracting a highly contagious disease with unknown severity and unknown long-term effects versus the unlikelihood of a blood cloth from Johnson & Johnson’s COVID-19 vaccine. Obviously any casual analysis would show that you’d get the vaccine.

> It was puzzling to me early on why they'd make a vaccine with a single protein (the case with both mRNA and viral vector vaccine). It seemed obvious a whole virus would have many more opportunities for your body to generate an immune response.

Why would this be puzzling? Can you share some scientific resources that describe the differences in using a “whole virus” versus “part of a virus” and how that affects vaccine effectiveness? I’d like to read the same materials you did.
It most certainly does violate their terms of service: the main terms require you to have copyright permission & any other rights for everything you post and there’s an entire policy specifically banning non-consensual content:

https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/intimate-medi...

This page goes back to 2018, too, so it’s hardly new: https://web.archive.org/web/20180103200035/https://help.twit...

> Sharing explicit sexual images or videos of someone online without their consent is a violation of their privacy and one of the most serious violations of the Twitter Rules. In addition to posing serious safety and security risks, it may also result in physical, emotional, and financial hardship for the person whose media is shared.
Wireless has nothing to do with it, you always need encryption: https://blog.encrypt.me/2013/11/05/ssl-added-and-removed-her...
I agree. I did my degree at a top 10 university in the world. Bachelor mixed, Master focused on AI.

All I can say is, the job market for data science, machine learning engineering and similar is heavily overcrowded. This means that due to competition (lots of supply, not so much demand) salaries will be (a lot) lower than e.g. software engineering. I didn't even bother going into the field, I heard enough horror stories from friends. Several of which got into high prestigious AI companies, for which they had to pass 6+ very challenging interviews and compete against hundreds or thousands of other candidates to get in. Yet, they get paid peanuts compared to what I now rake in as an SWE. When I do 6+ challenging interviews with a company for an SWE job, the least I (can realistically) expect is a TC of > $160k.

Sure, there's these mythical $500k+ salaries for data science / machine learning as well, but they are a lot rarer than for SWE, simply because the market is much smaller for them. So you're playing the game of trying to become a famous football player, where only the top of the top get dream contracts, the rest not in a long shot.

Money is not everything, true, but at some point you have to ask yourself what's worth more; chasing an elusive dream of meaning or focusing a little bit on your well-being as well.

I don't necessarily regret focusing on AI, but from a pragmatic point of view, I rather should have taken a couple more systems and cloud computing classes in hindsight.
The plan is to have a legal but harmful framework, and Elon Musk decides what is harmful. What could possibly go wrong? Threatening US multinational with billion dollar fines? Try that shit in a non-Biden administration. Has the UK gone mad?
No, this is what happens when you have a weak government that knows they won't be in power in 2 years: land grabs. They push outrageous stuff, effectively daring the opposition to rescind it later and face the relevant cries ("New government helps pedophiles!!11!"). It can happen anywhere.
I had the weirdest interview of my life with Tik Tok.

Tik Tok, like anything run by the Chinese or other totalitarian regimes, is not very respectful of autonomy or freedom of expression, but I still want to know what went down at my old NGO after I was forced out -- I had thought the CEO worked for the Russians or something, she was so effective at destroying the organization like one of the sabotage guides I used to read in middle school on textfiles dot com, but one day I pop over to LinkedIn and she ended up working for Wal Mart, and the general counsel ended up at Tik Tok as people on Signal would do literally anything but connect me with a decent job but tell me the weirdest shit like "The Mayor of Albany beats his wife"

(Apparently one of my friends may have given their phone to some now dead FBI agent around the time I renewed my passport and loudly declared presidents last 8 years max and switched from learning javascript and CSS to learning Python and Metasploit.)

Anyways, Tik Tok sucks, Facebook sucks, all social media sucks. Delete your accounts and learn the value of verbal conversations in a room with NPR cranked to 11 on an analog radio you built yourself in a 3rd floor walkup with the door bolted and barricaded.

(Or maybe the above is disinformation... reader beware, you're in for a scare!)
And the Royal Merchant Marine making huge efforts at resupply, and the UK's own material response.
How long before software engineering roles are in decline because one engineer can leverage GPT to do the work of ten? It's truly a new innovation that requires relearning the toolset. Every generation seems to have some abstraction over the last. This feels like a new way to program.
Agree that great managers are sometimes individual contributors who take on the job because they believe doing so is the only way to ensure effectiveness. But it's important to filter for ego-as-motivation, which can make for a terrible manager....

There's another type of great manager, too, whose best quality is their ability to defend the team from b.s. and politics originating elsewhere in the organization. This is especially valuable in large, established companies.
Reading the article, according to Steve Jobs, the best managers are the people who are so good that they realise that they must do it themselves, even if they don't want to. The title of the article thus has only a necessary but not sufficient condition according to what Steve originally meant. In other words: Clickbait.
Yes, but you can twist it around: if even the bloody Torygraph is against this crap, how bad it must be...
I'm no fan of the Telegraph, but all those links show is that it's willing to give comment space to people with different points of view.

(Or, to put it another way, the fact that they're willing to print a column by Fraser Nelson isn't a reason to suppose their home affairs editor isn't still in favour of the bill.)
Yeah, no. The jan 6 people are in jail for a lot more than just protesting.
This is true but nuanced in my experience.

Often the best managers look around, see other managers being incompetent and messing up people’s natural abilities, and want to fix the problem even if it requires them to become managers.

Often the worst managers decide at a young age they’re good leaders, can lead people to do better than they would themselves, and decide they want to get into management.

I make this distinction because even group 1 managers usually have to raise their hand and say something like “can we please stop messing this up. I can help.”

Rarely is an awesome individual magically called upon to become a manager, particularly by poor managers who are already messing stuff up.

In an environment where management is good, there’s a longer cycle of development, mentorship, and nudging of high potential people into management. But if you’re not in that environment, you probably need to ask to help make it better. It won’t happen magically.
This!

I was using ubuntu a lot years ago but have now settled on Debian. No annoying crap like this happens there, apt is all i need!
His nudes definitely did:

> Sharing explicit sexual images or videos of someone online without their consent is a violation of their privacy and one of the most serious violations of the Twitter Rules. In addition to posing serious safety and security risks, it may also result in physical, emotional, and financial hardship for the person whose media is shared.

The hacked content in general is covered by this. Given the contents, it doesn’t appear that the news exemption covers most of the material:

https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/hacked-materi...
Dependency graphs in the JS ecosystem are notoriously large.

I certainly wouldn't want this because of the huge number of dependencies.

Watching a src directory is usually the way to go.