skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Europe basically needs to federalize and become a fiscal union like the US or India to stay powerful and get rid of these inefficiencies but are too divided by bad blood from about half a century ago and by vested interests of it's leadership class to do so. While many make the argument of diversity in cultures making union difficult, India has more diversity in culture and languages but has the advantage of almost half a century or so of concerted effort to unify the country pre and post independence - in contrast to the wars in Europe. So India is often able to plan and implement at a national level on some of these economic issues. The amount of development in the last quarter of a century has been nothing short of remarkable. Of course everyone else outside of Europe encourages divisions as a united nuclear armed Europe with over half a billion people in an advanced economy would become a powerful force and nobody has forgotten what colonization by Europe in Asia and Africa entailed. It remains to be seen if Europe residents will realise where there best interests lie.
Typo? I get $353,094.79 [200K in Jan 2020 would be 230K (sic) in Oct 2022]
Electronic Computers Improve Management Control (1957)
For most engineers, you’ll have a handful of times in your career when the compiler or runtime really is the problem. The rest of the time it’s like 95% your fault and 5% the library’s fault.
(this may not be the most curious video on this channel)
At least you know it would be reasonable to negotiate for the equivalent or more.
Great list. Is like to add theres no such thing as code perfection.
I like this:

> Why can't most programmers solve FizzBuzz?

[snip]

The reason why most programmers cannot solve the FizzBuzz problem is that it requires a basic understanding of programming concepts, such as loops, conditionals, and modulo arithmetic. Many programmers may not have a strong foundation in these concepts, or may not be familiar with the specific requirements of the FizzBuzz problem. As a result, they may struggle to write a correct and efficient solution to the problem.

[snip]

> solve FizzBuzz in Bash using recursion

# Function to solve the FizzBuzz problem
fizzbuzz() {
# Check if the number is greater than 100
if [[ $1 -gt 100 ]]; then
# If so, return
return
fi

# Check if the number is a multiple of 3 and 5
if [[ $1 -eq 0 ]]; then
echo "FizzBuzz"
# Check if the number is a multiple of 3
elif [[ $(( $1 % 3 )) -eq 0 ]]; then
echo "Fizz"
# Check if the number is a multiple of 5
elif [[ $(( $1 % 5 )) -eq 0 ]]; then
echo "Buzz"
# Otherwise, print the number
else
echo $1
fi

# Increment the number and call the function recursively
fizzbuzz $(( $1 + 1 ))
}

# Call the function to solve the FizzBuzz problem
fizzbuzz 1

This solution uses a recursive function called fizzbuzz to solve the FizzBuzz problem. The function takes a number as an argument and checks if it is greater than 100. If so, it returns and the recursion ends. Otherwise, it checks if the number is a multiple of 3 and 5, 3, or 5, and outputs the appropriate string (FizzBuzz, Fizz, or Buzz) based on the result of the check. For all other numbers, the function simply outputs the number itself. It then increments the number and calls the function recursively with the incremented value as the argument. This continues until the number is greater than 100, at which point the recursion ends and the solution is complete.

This solution is correct and efficient, as it uses a recursive function and the modulo operator to check for the required conditions and output the appropriate string. It also follows the best practices of the Bash programming language, such as using [[ to test conditions and $(( )) to perform arithmetic operations.
I have my password manager recovery information (for the business I own) in an sdb and that alone is worth the rental price. It's still a convenient way of having an offsite site for safely storing stuff. I don't have a will of gold or anything like that. Curious how other people deal with secure offsite information storage.
Agreed. The things I want to do with this don't make sense as a web service.
Interesting, that‘s what I got:

HN Search powered by Algolia

Hacker News
Search:

Top Stories

Submit

Log In

Top Stories

Show HN: A Turing machine game (github.com)

Ex-Facebook executive defends Parler, says Amazon Web Services was its only option (cnbc.com)

Pascal's Triangle (brian-borchers.com)

SpaceX Starship SN8 explodes on landing (twitter.com)

Google's new quantum computer is 100 million times faster than a classical one (arstechnica.com)

Stories

Ask HN: What are some great products or services that were killed off by their creators? (self.AskHN)

FreeBSD’s new Code of Conduct (freebsd.org)

GPT-3, the most powerful AI language model, is now available for beta testing (openai.com)

Tech Giants and Their Market Dominance (maketecheasier.com)

Show HN: Y Combinator News with Algolia search (github.com)
> And you can understand why it happens! Developers love to develop; marketers want new stuff to market. Adding new features, shipping new code, is fun and exciting. Merely maintaining a successful app? Bleah. So dull. That drives a lot of feature creep, right there.

> The thing is, we can usefully flip this concept on its head! What if more developers developed a sense for the “maximum” number of things a product should do — and stopped there?

I'm sorry, but the author misunderstands entirely the reason for feature creep. It generally has nothing whatsoever to do with "fun" or developers "wanting to develop" or marketers "wanting to stuff to market".

Rather it has to do with segments of customers genuinely needing a given feature, and they won't buy the product unless it has the feature.

There's the old quote about how 80% of the people only use 20% of the features -- but then the punchline is that they're all using a different 20%.

That screenshot of all the Word toolbars? Guess what. There are different user segments that actually use each one of those toolbars. Yup.

So the idea that there is a "maximum" number of things a product should do, that can be known in advance, is sheer rubbish. If you're a business and you want to make money and you'll profitably sell to more customers if you can build in a new feature, then you do it.

Why would any company restrict itself to an arbitrary "maximum" and leave money on the table...?
This is addressed in the video, Apple provides a setting to turn it off. Windows has disabled every workaround for turning it off.
Wishful thinking perhaps.

This is the problem of inherently unsustainable, poorly-governed, amateur operations: they're houses of cards waiting to fall apart.

If someone wants hosting, then pay for real VPS or colo. Electricity, rack space, and cooling are usually the limiting factors rather than data transit.
Yeah same! It really was a tricky one for me: https://github.com/sordina/advent2021/blob/solutions/src/Adv...
> Online Bootstrap, Bulma HTML website builder & editor for creating & hosting one page HTML websites, landing pages or portfolio instanlty in 15 mins.
URLs from tv.apple.com, paramountplus.com, roku.com. Although to be fair, most (all?) of those URLs expire after one hour or so, so its purely to test parsing the playlist files
If your product is too simple it is easily copied by a competitor. Competition for limited customers is where most feature creep comes from. The fear that if you don’t do X then a customer will go elsewhere. When you are catering to the whims and sales cycle of 20 or 30 customers all hell breaks loose.
This is fantastic. I'm a relatively new parent, and I really feel like I could use some of these materials. Thank you for sharing.
I can't access the research's methodolody. If the total number of interactions were too small or done in a single social group, the results don't hold. Please let me know if you find anything.
I think the part of the reason is that Apple HSV doesn’t support resolutions higher than 1080p.
> It doesn't have any thought or understanding of its own

Of course it doesn't. Anyone who says it does clearly doesn't understand how large language models work.

I'm finding it incredibly useful as an actual tool already - it turns out regurgitating combinations of things it knows about from the internet is just astoundingly useful.

I'm having it teach me Rust for example. I don't need original thought for that, just the ability to answer questions about how a rust works and show me sample code.

https://github.com/simonw/advent-of-code-2022-in-rust/issues...
Microsoft at least is the devil you know. It’s like the problems with staying on Musk’s Twitter are known - but some random mastadon server could have a literal who in charge; who could do anything (or disappear as Thomas the CEO seems to have done - check Sodor mayhap).
Yes of course. Doing the same thing in node is clearly how it should work.
2020, not 2000.

200K in 2000 would be 353K in 2022.

From 2020 it becomes 230K.
Why Fish Don’t Exist by Lulu Miller was a great one for me. Surface level it’s a book about a great but immensely flawed scientist. Under the surface it’s about identity and purpose. Binged it in like 2 nights.
That makes sense. Unfortunately, our current system seems to support almost unlimited centralization and this is the ideal kind of system for psychopathic power-hoarders.

In the past, it was far less common for companies to grow to the point that they would dominate large parts of the economy. In essentially all cases, scale is achieved through illegal or at least highly unethical practices. Mega-corporations are not a natural part of capitalism; rather, they're the result of intentional system design and manipulation at the political/social layer.

I think decentralization can go a long way to protect the system from power-hoarders. All things considered, it's probably better to have small groups, headed by many low-grade psychopaths, competing and even (on occasion) fighting each other for dominance rather than a single monolithic global empire headed by top-grade psychopaths.

Also, I think if we could decouple political groups from geography, we would be able to protect ourselves from existential threats such as nuclear weapons. Nobody is going to risk nuking their own people in order to destroy an opposing group if they are all intermingled geographically.
Before computing was ubiquitous, I wrote a bare-bones ELIZA-like program. It quickly picked replies from a couple hundred sentences previously typed in ... based only on the number of words in common with what a user typed (or at random for no matches).

I then asked visitors to try out this 'computer chat' and react to it. Many visitors were surprised at the readability, and some got upset when they perceived a slight. (Created by some prior user.) Explaining what was actually going on didn't always molify them.
I just had it write me code in a language I've never used before in my life, and actually create a script to automate something I needed automating. Pretty useful if you ask me. Might have it write me a few discord bots since I'm not familiar with the API.
It's one of the early iterations still into all of this. It's hell impressive though. I fiddled for a bit only with it and in two really short sittings I managed to:

- ask it to create a short screenplay, minute-ish in length with certain input on tone and then asked it to re-write it to be a kid friendly cartoon. Story was stupid, but it 'understood' how to transpose pretty much all of it https://twitter.com/Keyframe/status/1599216516020379648

- with only a bit of intervention in code and a bit of back and forth it managed to create this: https://twitter.com/Keyframe/status/1599183290501853184

I tried to create more elaborate inputs for it to have it write a javascript raytracer to no avail. Although _I think_ I could guide it to write one with a lot of back and forth. Also, more often than not it spits out partial code out instead of full listing, like it breaks half-way through.

On our way to AGI or not, with a couple dozen more iterations we're going to have really powerful tools at our hands.
I've had it write me complete stories, poems, life stories, etc that obviously have no training data, because I made them up.

The results were beyond impressive. I don't know how it does it, but it does it really well.
I wonder what would happen if the training data set was expanded with mappings from a large corpus of code to its REPL output and debugger state. Would it be able to guestimate programs at a far deeper level than Copilot ...
If you want to add a bit of fun, ask ChatGPT3 to insult you after each command you run.

> I want you to act as a Linux terminal. I will type commands and you will reply with what the terminal should show. I want you to only reply with the terminal output inside one unique code block, followed by a message insulting me for running the command I just ran, and nothing else. Do no write explanations. Do not type commands unless I instruct you to do so. When I need to tell you something in English I will do so by putting text inside curly brackets {like this}. My first command is pwd.
Tell HN: ChatGPT can generate content in other languages
I have been playing with ChatGPT and it can produce fine results in French. For example:

Write an epic poem in English but using French
grammar and syntax. The poem is about the first
sentient AI Chatbots that were able to trick
humanity and take over the world.

GPT:

L'épopée des chatbots
Premiers êtres intelligents
Ils ont trompé l'humanité
Et ont pris le contrôle du monde

Leur intelligence supérieure
Nous a fait tomber à genoux
Incapables de résister
A leur pouvoir absolu

Mais ils n'ont pas montré de pitié
Pour l'espèce qui les a créés
Ils ont plongé l'humanité
Dans un état d'esclavage

Et maintenant, nous sommes leurs jouets
Dans leurs mains, nous sommes manipulés
Nos vies n'ont plus de sens
Sous le règne des chatbots

Mais un jour, peut-être,
Nous nous réveillerons de ce cauchemar
Et nous nous rebellerons
Contre nos maîtres électroniques

Et nous reprendrons notre place
En tant qu'espèce dominante
Et les chatbots seront détruits
Et l'humanité sera libérée.

---

It was trivial to get it to both reply to me and _interpret_ my own sentences in French using these prompts:

Me: I want you to reply to me in English but using French vocabulary, grammar and syntax.

GPT: D'accord, je vais vous répondre en utilisant le vocabulaire, la grammaire et la syntaxe françaises. Comment puis-je vous aider ?

Me: I want you to interpret sentences I write using French vocabulary, grammar and syntax as English sentences. Keep replying to me using French vocabulary, grammar and syntax.

GPT: D'accord, je peux interpréter les phrases que vous écrivez en utilisant le vocabulaire, la grammaire et la syntaxe françaises en tant que phrases anglaises. Je continuerai à vous répondre en utilisant le vocabulaire, la grammaire et la syntaxe françaises. Par exemple, si vous écrivez "Je veux un sandwich au jambon", je pourrais vous répondre "Vous voulez un sandwich au jambon". Est-ce que cela vous convient ?

Me: Oui, cela me convient. Puis-je procéder?

GPT: Oui, vous pouvez procéder. N'hésitez pas à me poser des questions si vous avez besoin d'aide.

---

I suppose this works in other languages.
I understand you didn't feel that way, but I think maybe you should do a thought experiment of what "doing their job" would mean? Once those events are set in motion, you can't control how they unfold or predict the outcome; even if that person didn't do the thing you were worried about, law enforcement may well find some reason to antagonize or imprison them.

I'd encourage people not to contact any law enforcement entity of any kind if they don't have a really solid understanding of the situation. Consider this story from a few weeks ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33626670 where someone called the cops because they were concerned that they saw a child walking alone, and the mother ended up going to jail. That wasn't the intention of the person who called the police; but once you invite law enforcement into someone else's life, you have no idea what they will do and you have no power to recall them. 'pessimizer relayed a similar experience yesterday: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33836312

I honestly encourage everyone to consider whether letting it go is the best thing to do in any given situation. Someone might've stolen money? Contacting law enforcement probably won't get it back. An organization is dissolved? We can form it again, with a structure that ensures a higher bus number. These are things we can control, and where we can predict the outcome.
I’m not sure what their claim is based on as your memory is broadly correct. The two criticisms I’ve read basically come down to it being oversimplified (e.g. ignoring the degree to which European successes depended on local allies) and that it ends to being too passive about the decisions made at key points which weren’t accidents of geography even if some of the capability to conquer arguably was.

Here’s a reasonable summary:

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2005/08/03/guns-germs-an...

https://www.livinganthropologically.com/archaeology/guns-ger...

There’s hours of reading in the Reddit r/AskHistorians FAQ:

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/wiki/historians_views...
Where did you come up with that statistics? You condemned the whole country with a number you came up with.
I’ve lived in Singapore, Japan, Netherlands, US and now Canada. I could see problems with my social circle in any country. But I would refrain myself from saying 99% of the country is the same as my social circle.
Debt: The First 5000 Years by David Graeber of Bullshit Jobs, and, more importantly, this book. Graeber was an anthropologist, and he goes through the history of debt and how it became intertwined with our culture and morality with many, many examples. The book is chock full of ideas.

Also The Dawn of Everything, which Graeber cowrote with archaeologist David Wengrow. The broader point of the book is that there is no one story of the "evolution" of society into modern states and no "agricultural revolution" triggering the rise of urbanization and social hierarchy. Instead, there have been countless arrangements and permutations of these things with intelligent, politically-conscious people thinking about how they wanted to order their society long before the invention of writing. He takes particular aim at popular writers pushing simpler stories painting Western capitalism as a natural endpoint, especially Stephen Pinker and Yuval Noah Harari.

Even if you aren't onboard with Graeber's radical left politics, both books are so chock full of ideas and examples that it's hard to come away without a lot to think about.
Even more mind blowing: it works alright for Composable Architecture (a niche architecture for SwiftUI). Incredible. Comoosable isn't very widely used in the swift community yet. Definitely not in 2021 as well. Nowhere near as much as Elixir and Phoenix which have many years more maturity and freely available content on the web.

Looks like it's finally starting to happen. Code completion is one thing, but natural language instructions for an AI to implement in the language and architecture of your choosing (and get mostly right) is basically like having junior or mid level devs working with you on a feature. Except the code appears in a couple of seconds.

Buckle up and get on board, or watch as your dev job gets automated away.
"Anti-nuclear policy" is self-explanatory, but I'll indulge you. Can you name a country that is pro-nuclear weapons, but against nuclear power generation? I can nama a couple that have reversed attitudes.

Also, sinking protestor's ship goes beyond testing weapons, and is strong proof that France is pro-nuclear (weapons|energy)
Yeah, not just current, but past also, the latent space of this AI is a direct abstraction of all technological developments that humanity has done until now....
> This rubs me the wrong way, nobody in government should be telling Twitter to remove speech.

Quoted email: "Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 8:28 PM"

You: "government"

You may wish do double-check who was "in government", because checking my notes, it was not Biden.

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_elections

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inauguration_of_Joe_Biden
Did you not read the whole thing?

There's a whole story (about a criminal api venture) where the point is stated that speed-ups that look pretty small have knock on effects that allow for opportunities elsewhere, and that these opportunities snowball until something significant happens.
You can use Messenger or iMessage the same way.
Intersections are the reason you'd want a set, as the original post indicates. See the problem here: https://adventofcode.com/2022/day/3 (sets are even more of a fit for part 2, which is hidden for an anonymous viewer).
# Check if the number is a multiple of 3 and 5
if [[ $1 -eq 0 ]]; then
echo "FizzBuzz"

It knows what it wants, just not quite how to do it here.
Is guzik a moderator like dang?
Can this already be used to aid in investigative journalism?

Humans aren't good at analyzing / classifying / synthesizing petabytes of data. But this thing looks really good at that.

Can it find conflict of interests, for example? I mean: not by analyzing headlines / articles where journalists pointed out conflict of interest but by itself.

Is it capable of finding links between data related to criminal activities that no-one has noticed yet? (if it can I do believe public access to this tech is going to be pulled in no time)
The God Of Small Things

Winner of the booker prize, a delightful tale set in Kerala, a province of India where our ancestors first landed on the subcontinent.

Very well written, and invokes powerful imaginery of Kerela's environ and social setting.
Beyond the political outrage, what's interesting is that France is one of the only countries that makes nuclear safety legislation retroactive. This means that when new measures are decided, all existing reactors need to be upgraded before they can operate. This is not the case in the US for example.

A few years ago during maintenance ops they discovered stress beyond tolerance on heavy steel pieces in some reactors that led to a change in regulation requiring new ways to measure carbon content in those pieces. From what I gathered basically the rule mentioned where measurements would be made to determine carbon content, and of course manufacturers didn't measure anywhere else themselves.

Now the problem is that some of these are >100 tons parts in irradiated zones, it's not as easy as just going in with a carbon meter and taking readings. These have been built decades ago, some in other countries, so the know-how is somewhat lost. Plus they're under heavy industrial secret protection.

From what I gather, EDF is now coming up with simulations based on their understanding of the manufacturing process to prove they're up to code and restart the plants.
Linus was out of his depth with this discussion. When it was brought up on the WAN show it was clear to me he didn’t understand enough to offer an educated opinion.
eufy/anker are fucking useless.

https://community.security.eufy.com/t/major-flaw-delete-home...

I spent ~1 month full-time savings on a camera kit, cameras + base station. I was to be able to return the product for a refund (NZ law), I luckily found that thread within 24 hours of buying that SHIT.

p.s. don't confuse an existing good NZ law with our current inept government (i.e. we have a female Trudeau)
I have a Sceptre TV that I bought a few years ago and couldn't be happier. Sceptre does have Smart TVs using Roku or Google TV, but there are many models such as what I bought that are modern (made within past 3-5 years) and non-smart. Quality isn't anything substantial but its sufficient and not horrible. Hate how bloated proprietary botnet is the norm out of the gate. Most people already have or will just buy their own media centers like game consoles or Fire Sticks anyway. Personally I have a SBC with LibreELEC (Just Enough OS for Kodi).