> Road transport world wide is around 11% of emissions. Eliminating it will eliminate 11% of emissions.

No! It will not! Electric vehicles do not result in 0% emissions. Not even close.

Want to do the math on electrification? Go figure out the emissions produced by the entire process. The fact that you believe it is 0% says a lot about just how little you understand about, well, everything.

At a minimum, in order to fully electrify our ground transportation system we need to DOUBLE our power generation and transportation (the grid) system. Setting aside the fact that we can't build infrastructure worth a shit these days, a buildout of this magnitude isn't zero emissions at all.

For a sense of proportion, if all of it was nuclear, we would need somewhere in the order of 1200 brand new 1 GW nuclear power plants. If it was solar, we would need at least ten times that much and more batteries than anyone could imagine. Good luck with any of that. We would have to rape the earth for resources just to do this in one country, much less every nation on the planet. I don't even want to think about additional CO2 contributions to the atmosphere.

> Building heat and electricity is another 17%. Insulating, electrifying the heat (or using sunlight) and using low carbon sources for the electricity will eliminate 17%.

Once again, you don't know what you are saying. You are not going to go from 17% (assuming your figures are correct) to 0%. You are saying "and then a miracle occurs" and we are at 0%, completely ignoring what it takes to implement these changes and the reality that they are NOT carbon neutral at all, not even close. Not going to happen. In a fantasy, sure, in real life things don't work that way. My guess is you'd be lucky if you get a 2% to 3% savings, if that.

> That's over a third of the way there.

The part you don't seem to want to grasp is that reducing world-wide emissions by 33% does absolutely nothing. This, if it were possible, it is likely to take a century or more, if ever. World population will continue to increase, which, in turn, will produce more CO2 due to our activities.

Reducing it by 66%, does nothing. Atmospheric CO2 will continue to increase.

Even worse, reducing it by 100% --which is patently impossible-- will, again, do nothing at all. Why? If this were possible (again, it is not) this might take 500 to 1000 years. By that point in time the earth might have twenty to thirty billion people (if we don't kill ourselves first). This means our activities will produce massively more CO2 no matter what we do. Food production. Homes. Travel. Clothing. Producing household, commercial and industrial goods. Etc. All of it pumps CO2 into the atmosphere.

Even if we could get to 0% CO2, at that point it would take a hundred thousand years for a mere 100 ppm drop. Nature is the only power on this planet that can affect this change. And it takes nature a very long time.

This is were getting a sense of proportion is important. People are talking about reducing CO2 by a few percent when, if you really look at the larger picture, none of it is significant. And, as you get to the more extreme claims, it is nothing less than fantasy.

You are free to believe that math and physics don't matter. I am not going to say anything here to convince you. Don't know how old you are. I hope you live long enough to eventually understand that, at some point, reality matters. I think these realities are going to start hitting people in the face pretty hard in another decade or two. You'll wake up one day and realize everyone has been lying to you for financial or political gains. We will be no closer to solving anything. We will have wasted decades selling (and voting for) nonsense. We will realize we could have been discussing the truth and acting on it. The problem will be that we will have wasted resources (financial and natural) to such an extent that it might just be impossible to do anything intelligent by the time that realization sinks in.

The tragedy of that moment will be that the well-to-do will have the means to adapt and plan for the future. The poor will not. That's the greater long-term tragedy of the cult climate change has become. The people supporting the narratives, the masses, are the the ones who will suffer the most. Just like the people who supported a $15/hr minimum wage only to wake up one day to the reality that their $15/hr "raise" has now devalued down to $5/hr, if they have a job at all.

Reality has a way to assert itself regardless of what we want to believe or not. That is, oddly enough, reality.