skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
As a recreational diver I meet many people diving within recreational limits that don't use diving computers at all (they usually rely on their DM or guide dive computer which is good enough for < 30m dives people do recreationally).

For that reason the Apple Watch Ultra seems just fine - it doesn't seem to have any less features than my dedicated Suunto D5 (outside missing integration with air tank) and it seems to be a good competitor to Garmin's Descent MK2 series of diving computers (which are pretty amazing but cost 1200$+ with tank pods).
20% of people think the world is flat. I stopped finding it disturbing what large portions of the public think.

I don’t think this is unique to the US either. People believe crazy things (or perhaps just like trolling pollsters).

I’m not even sure what a “leftist org” means.
> biggest "adult in the room" by far, whom was pushing for regulation, turned out to be another scammer

SBF was far from an adult in the room. He got zero policy to even a serious discussion phase. To the degree we see meaningful calls for regulation, it comes from Banking and Financial Services committee members who not involved with crypto pushing draconian rules.
I've never found any limitations to Linux's ACL.

I'm not saying your use case is invalid; I'm actually expressing sincere curiosity: what do NFSv4 ACLs bring to the table and what problems does it solve?
> When you go to a project and see it has 500 open issues, people assume that most or a good chunk of that is bugs.

That's just changing how GitHub presents the "issues." They could just as easily remove the global number display and simply display the count of each type of issue on the issues page.

> When you click the Issues tab, GitHub shows you all the feature requests you don't care about until you manually go and filter them out.

That's just a UX/UI concern. You can easily link to feature requests only.

None of these are "issues" related, but rather, just how it's displayed. Your concern is with the visuals.
BlockMonday – $50K+ of discounts on major brands when you pay with crypto
A RAV4, like most crossovers, is a car with slightly more headroom. Not really a fair comparison.

Compare it to a 2022 4Runner and you'll see that gas mileage is very similar.

Toyota is known for their top tier reliability and mid to low tier gas mileage and tech.
One place I worked put all their services behind private ELB instances. They didn't use PHP, but if they did, they'd pay the cost of HTTP(S?) connection establishment for each service call because the connection couldn't be reused across multiple incoming requests. DB connections have the same issue.
I agree with your distinction, but not with your degree.

It's *hard* v. *complex*, but it doesn't take as long as you'd think.

- Approach

- Chatting for an hour

- 10 texts back and forth to coordinate a meet

- Meet for 90 minutes

(repeat the last two bullets 3-5 times)

Is a pretty reliable path to "good friend".

Good friend is defined as: "Will reliable hang with you, schedule permitting 60% of the time you ask... and you will both have a good time"

Good friend is not, "Will donate a kidney"
To be fair, that is how the entire fractional reserve banking system started. Safe houses for gold handed out slips of paper to make it easier for the guys storing their gold to spend it and said, "hey, we'll actually pay you to let us hand these slips of paper out to people who want to borrow your gold. We just need you to stay quiet and be cool with us committing fraud and handing out WAY more borrow slips than there is gold. Cool? Cool."

We as a society accept large scale fraud all the time and normalize it.
I had to guess because one of the three flop cards were uniformative
(1) Heartburn, (2) Ass pain when it comes out the other side.
Well, also in other words, extant languages and CS education is failing people and they're writing these things the wrong way.
Escaping FTS Queries
OpenDolphin: A centralized, community developed social network
I think that's basically right. They've been weaving "high-status outdoor adventuring" into their brand for a long time — think about the codenames High Sierra and Mavericks, or going to an Apple store and seeing a ski trip under planning in the sample iMessages.

A big part of the way Apple signals their products as clean, healthy, and high-status is by depicting themselves as exactly that sort of people.

(Not to imply that this is particularly disingenuous, but they know exactly what they're doing)
Fashion is my simple answer. I think serving the niche well promotes sales among people with disposable income. People like it for looks.
For those curious, 40m is a standard cutoff for rec diving because

A) oxygen partial pressure with compressed air reaches 1.05atm, with 1.2-1.4atm posing a serious risk of oxygen-induced seizures (extremely dangerous)

B) nitrogen partial pressure becomes high enough that it becomes narcotic (every gas gets you high at enough pressure, even noble gasses).
When developing the book, I didn't have any additional meters or sensors to cross reference measurements with so I can't comment on the accuracy unfortunately. But I did notice that the changes in measurements made sense when the environment changed. I.e when I would exhale on the sensor, the measurement would rise and fall.

Another example was when I opened my window in my office. CO2 immediately dropped off (15:42 timestamp): https://twitter.com/akoutmos/status/1443233937015418891/phot...
Yeah I do the same as you since I write a ton of Swift (which does the same delineation as D).

It’s mostly just a mental marker for myself that I want to treat one as a value type.
Most of my EV driving is in single pedal mode. I absolutely love driving in this mode. I feel like I just have far more control over the vehicle by having a single pedal to directly control the speed instead of the vehicle just rolling when I get off the accelerator. Also, the fact the car just stays put when stopped instead of constantly rolling forward in drive is really nice.

Sometimes my car loads my wife's profile when I drive which changes it back to standard driving. It is jarring having the car just always want to roll forward. It just feels so much worse than single pedal driving.
I have never had a need to install a specific app and then not find it in the default App Store.
A compiler bug is a compiler bug, UB or not. You might as well just say "There have been more than a few compiler bugs, leading to very incorrect program behavior."
Does this piece strike anyone else as cringy? Seems like the author went out of his way to include as many California tropes as possible, to the point that I had to Google him to check if he was born in CA or not (he was not).
For baseball card I basically agree, with the main difference being you won't reliably make money on a given card. Some will go up and make you money, but realistically it's a collectible.

For lumber, there is an end user who wants the lumber to e.g. make a house. There might be some middlemen who buy it and then resell it, but they are also generally providing value in some way: storing it to smooth over demand variance, doing arbitrage to improve pricing, moving it from one location to another, etc. There's never just an infinite chain of middlemen selling it for ever increasing prices.
> It is definitely not, e.g., an assertion on the operand because UB can't happen.

C specification says a program is ill-formed if any UB happens. So yes, the spec does say that compilers are allowed to assume UB doesn't happen. After all, a program with UB is ill-formed and therefore shouldn't exist!

I think you're conflating "unspecified behavior" and "undefined behavior" - the two have different meanings in the spec.
Is there some resource detailing just how thorough the FDA reviews consumption safety? While I doubt this won't pass a long-term test, it'd be interesting to see whether or not food products are tested for long-term effects at different consumption levels, or if they simply test for any immediately concerning issues and constantly watch for illness/health problems that might be attributed to evolving consumption trends.
I get better results from DDG than Google.
This really isn't true. I lived a pretty active life for a decade or so, as a drummer in various drum groups (samba, etc). I was well-liked, people knew my name and seemed to enjoy hanging out with me, and I had some decent conversations. But I didn't really have any people I'd be super comfortable chatting with 1-1, and nobody I'd call up and specifically hang out with.

It was only when the pandemic hit that I realised that, without the regular group socials I was used to, I literally had nobody to chat to. At that point I started doing more or less exactly what this article said, and deliberately trying to make closer friends. I'm happy to say that the strategy worked pretty well.

Perhaps you are naturally good at making deep friendships in these circumstances, but I think a lot of people are not.
A Sikh Temple Combats Loneliness with Chai and Laughter
Dithering in a Software Defined Radio (Page 3) [pdf]
Look forward to lab-grown burgers and steaks!
Linus is correct that auto-vectorization is basically useless, but I have some minor disagreements. JSON is obviously not the only format or protocol that can be parsed using SIMD instructions. In general computers spend a lot of time parsing byte streams, and almost all of these could be parsed at gigabytes per second if someone familiar with the protocol, the intel intrinsics guide, and the tricks used in simdjson spent an afternoon on them. It's sort of unfortunate that our current software ecosystem makes it difficult for many developers to adopt these sorts of specialized parsers written in low-level languages and targeting specific vector extensions.

If someone wants to use a hash table or TLS, they may find AES-NI useful.
Some aren't so small https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7000201...

This would be between 5 and 10% or so.
Fridge door, light, etc.
I think the argument would be to not simplify judgement of things.

But left/right is a single axis. If you’re measuring left/right bias then you’re going to have a single axis.

A different argument is only the quality or usefulness of a media outlet. That’s definitely more dimensions and one would be left/right bias.
These are good resources:

https://mainframenation.com/mainframe/how-to-get-a-mainframe...

https://www.youtube.com/@moshix
Gotcha, so it's kind of like:

int (*(x = &(a)));
i i p p i // i means int, p means pointer
I'll just leave this here, in the hope that someone more knowledgeable than me clarifies this matter:

https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2022/09/09/putin-says-nea...
Interesting, that does remind me of times that some people would experience a brief “glow” feeling after consuming a handful of “inferno” chicken wings.
I have an 80 as well (1997 LX450) and another positive aspect of owning it is that when maintenance items become due, a lot of them can be fun[1] and enjoyable to tackle, and very very rarely will you run into an issue that doesn't have threads and discussions talking about the best ways to fix it. One downside to that is that you normally have to do a little bit of legwork to filter out the noise caused by other owners also looking for how to solve that particular issue.

[1] I've had to do the PHH on a rusty-ish 80, not fun: https://youtu.be/WQabGr4KY5g?t=158
A compiler bug cannot introduce UB by definition. UB is a contract between the coder and the C language standard. UB is solely determined by looking at your code, the standard, and the input data; it is independent of the compiler. If the compiler converts UB-free code into misbehavior, then that's a compiler bug / miscompilation, not an introduction of UB.
I wrote a thing about this: https://igor.moomers.org/minimal-viable-air-quality

I still have a few of those pms7003s, if you're in the bay let me know and you can come grab some
You'll find that the vast majority of bad UX decisions aren't coming from designers themselves, but from management.

See also: A/B testing UIs to maximize arbitrary metrics
I knew modbus was going to be mentioned. As someone who has written low level modbus software, there's nothing wrong with modbus. The only people who complain about it are people who are bad at data marshaling.
I agree that censorship is not the best angle the article concludes on but I don't think "user choice, decentralization, and community-controlled curation" are abstract ideas. The article is concrete what this looks like practically speaking:

> This means F-Droid gives you selected apps by default without bans or censorship. When you install the F-Droid app, it automatically connects to the collection on f-droid.org that is maintained by this community. F-Droid also makes it easy for anyone to publish their own repository, with their own curation rules.

i.e., yes, you do get the "F-Droid List" by default, but you are welcome to connect to a different list or publish your own "list" of apps that has its own curation rules.

Imagine if you could view Apple or Google's app store with an "awesome app" list curated by a list of experts you follow without all the junk of suggested apps or ads. That would go in the direction of "meta-curation" akin to what /u/hinkley is referring to in a another comment [1].

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33776244
Getting a stranger to have a conversation with you doesn’t mean you made a friend that day, at least not by and definition that’s valuable to me. It’s the first step, but what’s the conversion rate here? Most you probably never speak to again, a small number may reach acquaintance level, and even fewer end up as a friends. We probably have a different idea of what a friend is.
Mustard was around from the early Romans/Gauls I think, if that counts.
That may be, I admit I've never been on it. It's just a bit of a red flag to me when people stigmatize sex work, because sex workers have a hard enough time as it is.
We're talking about different ends of the market. You're talking about the high end where sought-after workers get multiple competitive offers and big raises from switching jobs frequently. In that case a hiring downturn means less offers, less switching and less raises. I'm talking about the low end where every employer has set a floor of let's say $120k for their developer positions, and if for some reason every employer decides that a job seeker is worth less than that, that job seeker won't be able to get a job as a developer. In that case the hard pill to swallow isn't accepting less money, it's leaving the field. It's possible for the floor to decrease over time to match the perceived value of that job seeker, but worker compensation is sticky so this would require a long downturn, during which time the job seeker will become even less valuable due to having been forced out of the field.

This all leads into the question of how rational and efficient the hiring market for developers is. I would say this is at least an open question, to put it mildly.
Chinese market is tightly controlled by the state. They have very strict rules for how western tech companies must behave. They have forced even the biggest players to abide by their censorship laws.

And yes, they are out of touch. But not from ignorance - they are intentionally appealing to our sense of fairness while pursuing their own interests.
Pointers are by far the most insidious thing about C. The problem is that nobody who groks pointers can understand why they had trouble understanding them in the first place.

Once you understand, it seems so obvious that you cannot imagine not understanding what a pointer is, but at the beginning, trying to figure out why the compiler won't let you assign a pointer to an array, like `char str[256]; str = "asdf"`, is maddening.

One thing I think would benefit many is if we considered "arrays" in C to be an advanced topic, and focused on pointers only; treating "malloc" as a magical function until the understanding of pointers and indexing is so firmly internalized that you can just add on arrays to that knowledge. Learning arrays first and pointers second is going to break your brain because they share so much syntax, but arrays are fundamentally a very limited type.
No it doesn't. The market for concert tickets is a complete shitshow, even though they're not subsidized by government. QED.
doubt.
Early Alder Lake could but they fused it off in the later ones and newer microcode also blocks it on the older processors.

Raptor Lake is basically "v-cache alder lake" (the major change is almost doubling cache size) so it's unsurprising they still don't have an answer there, and if they did it could be backported into Alder Lake, but they don't seem to have an immediate fix for AVX-512 in either generation.

Nobody really knows why, or what's up with Intel's AVX-512 strategy in general. I have not heard a fully conclusive/convincing answer in general.

The most convincing idea to me is Intel didn't want to deal with heterogeneous ISA between cores, maybe they are worried about the long-term tail of support that a mixed generation will entail.

Long term I think they will move to heterogeneous cores/architectures but with homogeneous ISA. The little cores will have it too, emulated if necessary, and that will solve all the CPUID-style "how many cores should I launch and what type" problems. That still permits big.little architecture mixtures, but fixes the wonky stuff with having different ISAs between cores.

there are probably some additional constraints like Samsung or whomever bumped into with their heterogenous-ISA architectures... like cache line size probably should not vary between big/little cores either. That will pin a few architectural features together, if they (or their impacts) are observable outside the "black box".
The market is punishing bad actors with insolvency. Yet somehow the conclusion is that markets are not effective in self-regulation.
Post author here, and yes this ^ is precisely what it's intended to mean. There are also other more exotic flavors of behavior, and the post isn't about those either.

I tried to cover as much ground in the post as possible, but the post is already a 10min read and covering unspecified / impl-defined behavior would have made it a 20min read instead :)
I think this is the wrong way to think about it.

For the type of organizations that run workloads on IBM mainframes, there are three drivers:
* Legacy: The application was written for the mainframe, cannot run on anything else, too expensive in terms of dev and test time to re-platform
* Business value: This is the big one; these workloads make their companies 100s of millions to billions of dollars per year. The price premium for running this on a mainframe is a rounding error.
* Reliability: With the cloud, I hold the opinion that the average x86 application is less available/reliable than a well-run pre-cloud application (which already included HA, etc.). Mainframe apps and hardware blow all this out of the water.

FWIW: I programmed mainframes briefly early in my career, I am quite familiar with the ecosystem.
Following extra spicy foods with a pint or two of milk neutralizes the post pyrotechnics, for me. If lactose intolerant, sugar works, but not as well(Perhaps in large/unhealthy quantity?). YMMV.

Edit: I always presumed the high after spicy food was endorphins.
You could think of it as the latter.

It's ocean alkalinity enhancement (offsets ocean acidification, lets the ocean continue to take up CO2).
Love it, I want to stop working today to test it!

I love board games and I'm member of Megajuegos Argentina (megagames)

We host games for more than 35/50 people and we needed something after the pandemic and to gather people from inner country.

I will be in touch!!
This is one of the grossest series of discussions on work and life that I've ever seen. OP, please stop shilling for corporations. 10x isn't real and training for any end is completely subjective person to person when it comes to technical skills. Do a good job on whatever you do and focus on improving things while accomplishing your goals both in work and personal life.
It was a critical hit, but not financial. It’s an interesting movie and I’m glad it was made. I would never invest in it. Making Jodorowsky’s movies is like art patronage.

Im not sure how the documentary producers substantiated their claim, so I linked to a pretty reputable source that describes the budget and box office.
Diving has a much larger market than you'd initially believe.

For instance, consider all of watch brands which have basically created an entire company under the premise of diving.
Absolutely not! Apple's hardware keeps getting better, but their software reliability has been quite bad over the last 10-ish years. A dive computer is a safety-critical machine - an apple watch is not suitable as a primary unit. Maybe if you're doing only very casual dives and you don't mind the risk of having to do an emergency surface, it is fine.
Check out Zig’s `Vector` type.
I don’t think I’ve seen SIMD built as elegantly into any other systems language.
> Unbelievable the amount of destruction of value here

Destruction of value or destruction of paper wealth? I'm pretty cynical of the whole crypto* space, mainly because I think the people making any money in it are themselves cynical and predatory.

I suppose that billion dollars of investment was actual cash lost.

* Using the new definition, not cryptography, which is what the term really means and will again soon.
> ...the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) will need to inspect the company’s production facilities and product

While I'm not undercutting the work that the USDA places into regulating consumer safety in the food supply chain, isn't it crazy to think that lab-grown meats are probably going to be under higher scrutiny from a food safety perspective than farm grown and butchered meats?
You're not wrong but for some reason this style is easier for me to work with

I know logically/semantically they're equivalent. The v-table function generated if the method is moved inside the class/struct winds up being identical.

Dunno what it is, some kind of familiarity bias with the way the code is laid out I guess, not coming from OOP languages
On the Origins of Taiwan's Semiconductor Industry
I grew up in a family that ate spicy food on a regular basis. So much so that we had one case where the waiter, seeing children at the table, advised us against taking what we wanted, namely a pizza named "diablo".

I watched him as he waited to intervene a few steps from us, platter in hand. Eventually he gave up.

In any case my experience, after 30 years of eating spicy food, is that I apparently don't feel the usual effects people who like spicy food do.

What happens instead is that the spice forces me to eat slower and thus get more flavour out of the dish. After all, "spicy" is technically not a flavour, so it mixes well with just about anything.

I did have a period of gradually increasing the dose, though, at the end of which I discovered that capsaicin is also excreted through urine. It is not a pleasant experience.
Not sure - but your question implies that there is harm to the society done, and from your first part of the sentence, isn't that also unconfirmed?
Do you also consider fractional reserve banks a ponzi scheme?

We have successfully regulated those.
It'll be days before the lava is potentially dangerous. It's slow moving so plenty of time to evacuate. It can take weeks for the lava to make its way to the ocean
> Edit: why the hate?

Because this post is pure sarcasm with nothing of value to add except for mocking people you disagree with.

> Do you guys love Instagram or something?

Nope. Hate it - but I don't feel the need to go spewing that hate over a tangentially related thread which has actual interesting discussion.