skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think it looks less bad in the weird context of 2020-2022, when breaking even with inflation meant moving money into riskier and riskier investments just to keep up with the money printer. I wouldn't have chosen something like BlockFi, but then again I'm one of the idiots that lost via a mix of inflation and various ultra boring indexes.

I can see where it might look tempting or even rational to see how long you can keep the hand on the oven without getting burned for some of the interest rates being offered on these "exchanges", especially in times of pretty desperately negative real interest rates on USD.
It really makes me appreciate the phenomenal products THEC64 and THEC64 Mini are. They are like Nintendo's mini consoles but they also let you sideload your own C64 software or boot to BASIC -- with no hackery needed! And you can have as many virtual floppies as will fit on a USB drive to save your work to!
I'm working on an Any Browser framework for making websites, and this means testing with IE 3.0 and up.

After installing Word 97, I have found it such a pleasure to use that I've started doing a lot of my writing in it.

From inside of a VM, it is still more responsive and accessible than most other things I have to use today.
Not all trees are equal. One must consider ecology and ecosystem health, not gross quantifiers like "number of trees" (really "number of trunks").
Thinking of bone, perhaps stress/strain during growth could be applied as well.

FWIW, there are also videos around of growing fungi into forms (aka growing molds into molds?).
Are Computers Peak of Humanity?
Ok but it's 2022 and something like ziglang can do all of these things with two keywords (const and comptime). Why does C++ need four?
Their Reddit account even went on /r/buttcoin the day prior to claim nothing was the matter.
Apparently that works well. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/towson-univer...
I feel similar, but mostly from leftover baggage from working retail. If someone says something nice to you when you're working a cash register, 9 times out of 10 they want you to do something for them and you're about 10 seconds away from them flipping over to a verbal abuse strategy to get what they want
Building a chat app with Nextjs and Elixir
It was a MIPS CPU with special proprietary vector units.
It can happen to anyone, but does happen to you. Thank your lucky sigmas.
Costs more than a spare Garmin Descent G1 for $500 (with rebate).

https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/766516
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FunctionMultiVersioning ?

And in clang - https://releases.llvm.org/7.1.0/tools/clang/docs/AttributeRe... .

I've never used them.

Don't know about other compilers.
Do you use any public libraries for those backend servers, or is it all home-grown? Curious what's at play.
How do you figure that protein is over valued? In my experience most foods people eat are fairly low in protein.
The current readings are on the display. The QR code encodes 40 previous values of CO2 plus 40 of the VOC index. I have a debug mode that can display the whole URL, but it is so long that it would be impractical to type it in instead of the simple QR scan.
All of the World's Money and Markets in One Visualization
Feedback is good, even if it's not in a pleasant form. What's worse is receiving no feedback at all. I assume people are trying to give constructive feedback.
Right word, wrong meaning. In the result you quoted, a person's intelligence is being compared to that of a NPC, implying that the person can't think for themselves and does whatever they're told like how NPCs in games act. The gp seems to imply a slightly different meaning, where a person is thought of as being not being a real person, and is only someone you go to for transactional work related stuff.
Python will have the fastest JIT and easiest FFI. A `python -m packager add package` would install a package and write to a lockfile. No messing with virtualenvs and requirements.txt. No pesky compilation steps for certain packages.

A linter that does perfect readability, McCabe complexity, static analysis and whatever SonarQube catches. Language server protocol that integrates it all with any editor. Edit a function and it will nudge you to failing tests, uncovered lines, possible nulls etc. Automated hypothesis testing that can exceed a QA with the most twisted mind.

It will have `python -m webserver --staticfiles static/ --websockets sockets.py --web web.py --threads 2 X CPUs+1` that performs as good as elixir, including websockets. And an Akka clone to distribute workers across machines. No need to manually write `await` anywhere.

A fully typesafe ORM, can rival raw SQL and does migrations.

A templating language that rivals JSX. A frontend framework with the smallest bundle sizes and no cognitive overhead of making an Ajax call. An ultrafast GUI toolkit that can run on a microcontroller and workstation alike.

A teaching IDE (like Thonny) that visually illustrates the interpreter for concepts like recursion, allowing you to step through operations. Graphics/physics libraries so kids can make simulated cars fly over speed bumps. It can visualise electron orbitals (actually saw it in a Pycon talk about a school program) with just stdlib.
Permutations and Combinations Cheatsheet
The argument seems to be about visual design, which is just one facet of UI design. And one thing the argument is missing is that a clear distinction between content and UI controls is critical for usability.
Not sure why the downvotes, same here. I disabled mine in favour of sketchy bar [0]. I hide most things except for bandwidth and clock. Super handy.

0: https://github.com/FelixKratz/SketchyBar
The many "Lab meat still has a long way to go" comments here haven't been following the space. Please check out wildtypefoods.com for an example of "lab" grown salmon that you can eat right now. There are other startups doing the same, google them up.
Maybe I’m paranoid, but I’ve seen too many people get exploited and shit on by people behind their backs while they keep the nicest demeanor face to face. Grown adults at that. Some of these people were well into their 30s.
Depends on the salt content. If you try things you read in comment sections on the internet, maybe you shouldn't be on the internet.
Wait, you're saying you can't relate anymore because you don't have close friends anymore and don't want any? Or because you have close friends naturally so don't need to analyze how to do it?

I am older than my 20s, and have moved jobs and cities a couple times, but I don't have a spouse or kids. I still have some close friends (including one or two i've had since my 20s and one or two i've met subsequently), but would personally like more and closer. I'm not sure if that answers your questions!

My guess is a lot of people in our particular society in the
USA stop having close friends when they have a spouse and kids... but I don't this this is true in all places and times, and I personally suspect it's not very healthy and people would be doing so much better in many ways, including unexpected ones in ways people don't realize would be affected by this, if they had more non-family intimacy. But whatever works!
google news malware, ransomware, dc/cloud outages, millions and see how many reference an IBM mainframe.

You get what you pay for. All your new fangled software and hardware just reinvents the wheel, is buggy, is layered on an onion stack with a lifespan of maybe 3 years and takes a lot more humans and money to run, diagnose and maintain. And in three years, a new CTO will come from Wharton and tell you you’re a moron for not using microservices 2.0 and spend $100M rearchitecting it.

In the meantime, Z/Power just keep going and 4 or 5 guys run the whole show. They sleep at night and have a life.
> But assignment is always a very cheap operation in C.

That's just not true though, you can assign struct's of an arbitrarily large size to each-other and compilers will emit the equivalent of `memcpy()` to do the assignment. They might actually call `memcpy()` automatically depending on the particular compiler.

The fact that if you wrap the array in a struct then you're free to copy it via assignment makes it arbitrary IMO.
> There seems to be an effect where the more visual information something is capable of, the more critical we become of its content.

Maybe because when the creators stop being constrained by the medium, they get "creative"?

> Go back and watch a VHS on a CRT TV, or even a DVD version of something that has a Blu-ray or HD version available to stream. It's abysmal, and yet we somehow managed to love them.

Good or bad, at least the full range of colors was used. For example, I've watched tons of Star Trek shows of home-recorded VHS tapes on CRT TV, and I'd still prefer that to watching new Star Trek live action installments in 1080p streaming on a high-quality computer screen, simply because in the VHS/CRT/old shows case, things had colors, and I could actually see what's going on.
There is one "small" problem - NFTs are NOT in any way related to the items/files someone is collecting. And collecting NFTs is about as interesting as "collecting" numbers from the random number generator.
> For example, templates were for sure complex, and they're very much a complete feature. That is, they haven't been made more complex over time.

I agree with your broader point but parameter packs (aka, variadic templates) were an addition to templates made in C++11. So strictly speaking they have gotten more complex.
I agree that many applications don't need menu bar extras. However, the option is always nice to have. Regardless of the HIG, it might not be good to restrict functionality to Dock given that many people turn it off.
We raised chickens when I was a kid, and I still raise meat animals today. When I was quite young, meaning no harm, I wrote the name of one of the chickens on the package, to the horror of my sisters. They promptly wrote the same name on all the packages. I've since learned a little more sympathy for people who fall more on the friend side of the friend/food continuum.
> biological men temporarily identifying as female

That is a discussion of gender, not sex.
I mean ... that big fund carves off a tiny slice to make speculative, risky bets, and a small one of those bets failed. Hard to call it swindled.
Good on them for cashing some of their winnings into fiat!... then showering 50 Cent with the money.

Being humble, even in the face of new wealth, is a virtue. Spending it all at da club to prove one is a big man is pretty pathetic.

Those Miami clubs will need to lean back on their old laurels: generational wealth.
While attractive women get more tips (according to some research), I'm not convinced they necessarily bring in more money to the restaurant owner, in general. Certain types of bars are probably an exception though.

Either way I'm not really sure that counts as a sales job in a more general sense.
> there are more trees today than there were 100 years ago. Forest harvest followed by replanting is not deforestation.

That depends on the biomass levels.
One step up from sheets or extruded shapes, perhaps grow hexagonal comb. Could have useful mechanical properties, and still be generically useful.
I think it depends on the intent and assuming others are trying to give constructive feedback. That's not mistreatment.

Not all feedback is delivered exactly how we would like (people are human), but that I, you, and they should try to deliver feedback professionally.
OP here. We originally started out with just Nextjs but ran in to limitations with running websockets on serverless function so had to split out a separate service to handle the websockets. Happy to answer any question.
I'm looking to add some filtering to my config for the newsboat RSS reader and that article and the one before it have some good ideas that I'll try to put into practice, thanks.
Interstitials or chum boxes?
I use Orion on iOS. It blocks ads by default and you can use uBlockOrigin with it. It's great!
Pretty sure it's not more expensive. People that are willing to buy vegan are just generally richer and more likely to be able to spend more. Thus the prices are artificially inflated by market segmentation.

At least where I'm from the companies make way more profit from their vegan substitutes then their equivalent meat products.
Is Open Source Attribution Dead?
There is also https://github.com/gao-sun/eul
Plant based meats are

1) Still not real meat, hence is only considered by a limited target consumer

2) Is still relatively new to the mass-market. Hence still isn't at it's lowest price point.
Regarding information density, I don't think this is necessarily true. Quantifying understanding between a reader and a text is always ambiguous, where the results of programs are intentionally designed to not be ambiguous (with varying results). Consider the ink and blood spilled over the implications of a single word in a holy text.

Saying that a reader understands a page or two of most books in a minute or so is like "understanding" the rules of Chess but being unable to actually win a game.

What differs between books and programs is the consequences of getting that sense of understanding wrong. When reading a book, the results of misunderstanding or skimming are rarely serious (outside the realm of technical manuals, textbooks, and holy books) whereas the programmer and user usually immediately notice that something is very wrong if the programmer took a wrong turn in their understanding.

Academics paid to "understand" non-technical books face so little consequences for misunderstanding that no one even agrees what understanding is. James Joyce's Ulysses is a crypto-ur-fascist work prefiguring the ascension and demise of Nationalist Irish America as found in the correspondences between Buck Mulligan and Donald Trump? Well, I certainly can't tell you that's wrong. Half of these terms would require volumes themselves to meaningfully define to an extent that a conclusion could even approach falsification.

This failure to understand misunderstanding is also pervasive in the majority of legal systems. They try to define terms and precedents in volumes and still have dogmatic disagreements about meaning and understanding.

Try doing this in a codebase and see how far you can get. "As you see, this comment in the Linux kernel was written by Linus Torvalds. Torvalds had many documented conflicts as a result of his frequently acerbic personality. We can date this comment to after his foray into improving his interpersonal skills. We can infer from the use of language found in the manuals of the University of Oregon's Anger Management school that Torvalds is emotionally disturbed yet diplomatically declining to accede to the Rust development team's demands for special privileges. Seeing that Torvalds, the creator of Linux, wanted to originally decline these changes, I have put forth a commit to undo all commits initiated by anyone associated with the Rust development team."

On the other hand, if programmers were to instantiate legal and semiotic assertions in Prolog from first principles, suddenly there's a legibility and granularity that makes the entire "meaning" and "understanding" game pointless because we can directly see and talk about where the logical assertions fail to correspond or contradict.
This is an interesting question actually and it leads me to draw parallels with some IRC channels, like for example #vmware and #rhel at libera (formerly freenode).

These are what I would call Enterprise environments, IBM, VMware, RHEL. And they all have one thing in common, lack of community documentation. Because in Enterprise environments you're expected to be trained.

And in the IRC channels people mostly talk about politics, or just everyday stuff. Very rarely do they nerd out about Linux or hypervisors. Because most people in there are trained engineers and neither need help, nor are willing to give help to someone.

If you go up to a crowd of enterprise people to ask a question, you better ask a good question. The old adage "there are no stupid questions" does not apply at all. Because these are trained people who have very specific knowledge of their Enterprise systems. They don't mess around with community projects or open source for fun. They do it to achieve a goal.

I know someone who started at IBM about a year ago and he's learning quickly how to program on IBM mainframes. By other senior engineers, and trainers.
honestly from reading how you write about yourself, I would immediately drop you into the "thinks more highly of themselves than they ought". Bucket. People who call themselves high performing rarely are in my experience. It's the humble people who learn and grow for the joy of it who truly shine.
Depends on what abstraction level we are discussing.

Existing applications without code changes in mainstream languages with parallelism-restrictive semantics, I agree we're probably close to the limits.

Beyond that we know that most apps are amenable to human perf work and reformulation to get very big speedups.

Besides human reformulation expressed with only low level parallelism primitives like SIMD instrinsics, the field has been using parallelism geared languages like Cuda, Futhark, ISPC etc. And there's a lot of untapped potential in data representation flexibility etc that even those languages aren't tapping, like for example Halide can do.

Human perf work also involves a lot of trial and error, it's a search type process, automation of which hasn't been explored that much. Some work to automating this are approaches like Atlas BLAS.
Hammerspoon is awesome. I have an `hs_message` alias that basically calls `hs.alert`. Super handy. The good thing about xbar is that you can quickly write small shells scripts. But I definitely love HS for global shortcuts/automation.

One of the more impressive things I've seen is stack line [0] a visualization tool that works with tiling window manager, yabai.

[0]: https://github.com/AdamWagner/stackline
Would running some pigs in the area for a while help? They'd root it all up.
I think this is also an example of bad default options. You should not have to setup a bug report form to get correct tagging. No one writes bugless code it should be a default option to have a bug report or a feature request. I understand the other fluff around separate queues but for something a large as GitHub good default options are really important.
> why Argentina, Uruguai and south Brazil are the best places to raise cattle in the world, it's just grass from horizon to horizon

Uruguay’s environment is massively altered by wide-scale cattle raising [1]. The savannahs are being destroyed, deforestation lowering water tables and effluence and run-off contaminating what groundwater remains. They’re great places to rear cattle. That doesn’t mean they have no environmental impact.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_issues_in_Urug...
OLED is the cheapest display with enough resolution.

No Bluetooth. A previous version had it, but the development effort was much higher, given it then needed an App also. I wanted something simple for say a school teacher to report values in their classroom.

Data is not stored long term currently. Just since last power on.
Lane Cruiser 70s are still very common in Australia and available new. They might be basic and old but they’re not cheap - starting around 80K aud.

https://www.toyota.com.au/landcruiser-70
I don't know if iSeries (AS/400) counts as Mainframe... But the software stack is similar and I know that hundreds (if not thousands) of casinos run old Main Frame era software.
On the other hand mainstream frameworks have a big community behind them, while the custom framework's support is only you - thus making it:

1) far more likely that you have undiscovered vulnerabilities in it,

2) actually a lot more work to keep it up to date and properly secured over time, since it's all up to your team (and this becomes exponentially harder with every 3rd party lib that you use).

Not implying it's the case with your company, of course, but most of B2B companies that I've seen that use custom frameworks solve these 2 problems by simply ignoring them and not updating anything - hoping for the best and relying primarily on security through obscurity for protection.
Is there a link to any of your research? I'm also interested in HLS tools and MLIR.
Much of the expertise on the platform has been slowly internalized by IBM over the years. The experts on the platform work for them.

Example. I used to work at a massive organization that did have some core applications on mainframes. The guys who maintained it retired and they couldn't find anyone to fill the position. So they contracted with IBM to maintain the system. Guess who showed up on site wearing IBM polos? The guys who just retired. Now doing the same job but making even more while doing it.
Stop using 0.5 as the threshold for your binary classifier
Once again we have a situation where the only person making that final claim is a known serial liar and shit poster.

Just like how last week he made that ridiculous claim about the promises he thought brand safety groups had made to him and then everybody else who was in the meeting said he was making shit up. Again.
> 1. Grass costs nothing, it's already there and we can't eat it. You have to shred it so it doesn't grow too high anyway.

> 2. Again, pastures are already there, nothing else is on them.

We’ve gone way beyond pasture just “being there” to rely on for animal agriculture at the rate we do it. Look at BLM grazing rates which are there to pay for renewing the grassland but to rate limit how many animal graze or the grassland would be destroyed. Amazon in Brazil is also being cut back constantly to create new pasture land

> 3. Perfect, that's more jobs, but I know small family farms with 100 head of cattle with no extra ranch hands.

If doing things inefficiently just to create jobs is a good idea, we might as well ban shovels and backhoes and make everyone dig with spoons
> SwiftUI has no concept of cell re-use at all.

This is not true, `List` definitely uses the same approach internally as `UITableView` for cell reuse.
> the very issue that Sabine is raising in the original article.

Doesn't have anything to do with the mistake the poster I have been responding to has been making. Sabine is talking about people who understand a given theoretical model but aren't willing to give it up when it either fails a test against experiment, or is shown to be in principle untestable by experiment. The poster I have been responding to does not understand the theoretical model being discussed, so is in a different position from the people Sabine is criticizing.

> Alternatively, you're literally arguing that the mathematics of the theory of relativity bears no meaning in reality.

I am arguing no such thing. I am simply making clear that, like any physical theory, GR has parts of its math that represent physically meaningful parts of reality, and parts of its math that represent human conventions that make calculations easier but have no physical meaning. Coordinate charts/reference frames, which is what the poster I have been responding to means by "point of view", are in the latter category. But invariants--quantities that are the same regardless of any choice of coordinates or reference frame--are also part of the math of GR, and those do have physical meaning.
It should turn off the fan and turn on the lights when its waking time, maybe music if I'm extra drowsy. It will recite the tasks for the day and habits I want to enforce. It will figure out if I'm exceeding my calorie intake. Self hosted of course.
Betteridge's law of headlines is applicable here. Will be interesting to see what happens in China wrt zero-covid, but he has a number of other takes that to me suggest a heavily distorted view of reality.
No link yet. Still working on a web site for it.