skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sorry for the delay! I made up an example in Python. See also https://docs.asciidoctor.org/asciidoc/latest/directives/incl...

Asciidoc document:

// Asciidoc begins

= Test include to code

Here's a paragraph. Let's take a look at a code block plus an include

[source, python]
----
include::loops.py[tag=count]
----

Python code filename loops.py

# Python begins

# // tag::count[]
count = 0
# // end::count[]
while count < 5:
print(count)
count += 1 # This is the same as count = count + 1

Output (text) - this is formatted in HTML or PDF as title, para, then a code block

Test include to code

Here’s a paragraph. Let’s take a look at a code block plus an include

count = 0
...which is a step back from the usual Japanese practice of choosing a kaishakunin to render some assistance
article says registers only started in 2018
Plug them into a computer using a USB adaptor.

I always update the one on my wrist as needed first. If there are lots of changes, I use XCOPY to scan/copy updated files only from the wrist card to the one kept in a safe. Otherwise, I may make the same updates to both manually.
EVs = grid storage gets thrown around a lot. There is currently no viable pricing model for these services, they have not been trialed at any scale and there is little to no legal framework with either vehicle manufactures or battery suppliers in terms of the warranty.

Your claim of batteries powering a gigawatt scale grid for two days does not pass the smell test. Something is off so it might help to show calculations or sources.
Why should the limits of our universe have anything to do with the limits of math? Math is bigger than our universe. If our universe were completely different, math would still be the same.

> We can represent these sets of cardinality infinities of infinities in our brain and on paper, but representing these sets with all the available bits in the universe is not possible. This seems like a paradox, because our brains and paper are part of the universe.

Eh, I can write a recipe that calls for multiple universes-worth of flour and 600 trillion years in the oven, and I can write that recipe in a minute on an index card that weighs a couple grams. I can write small programs that loop infinitely or (attempt to) use infinite memory. I can write a song that repeats ad infinitum that nobody can ever sing to completion in the entire lifetime of the universe. That's not much different than the words "the Integers" requiring 2 words but describing something that could not possibly be "fully materialized" in any finite universe. Who cares?

What those all have in common is that despite being very big or long in some sense, they have low Kolmogorov complexity. It's very easy to describe "recipes" for infinite things that would exceed the bounds of the universe if they were ever fully realized; you don't even need higher cardinalities for that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolmogorov_complexity

What higher cardinalities do tell us is that there must be some real numbers that have infinite Kolmogorov complexity, and in fact 100% of the real numbers have this property. (Of course all the numbers you have/will ever have heard of are in the remaining 0%.) There are only countably many (the smallest infinity) descriptions in any language (programming or natural), so most reals must not be "describable" at all. We will never be able to meaningfully use any of those numbers, because we couldn't possibly "compute" them -- we can't run the infinitely long program. It's not clear to me that we'd ever be able to learn anything at all about such numbers, or indeed that they "exist" in any meaningful sense.
I think most fans subscribe to the "main" sub (r/hocket, nba, baseball, etc) for general league news and discussion in addition to team subs.

Hololive functions in a similar way - the most popular members have their own subreddits in addition to the main hololive sub.
> But closing your eyes and pretending everything is a file is a security disaster waiting to happen (actually, happening every day).

What is this in response to? GP never mentioned file interfaces.
Income Percentile Calculator for the United States
What isn’t factored in, is the money shifting.

People are no longer spending money on gas, it’ll be going to the electric companies. They’ll have more revenue for investment in capacity.
They could also show ads in some fashion I suppose. Only thing you could do is move to another server - but at least you can do something other than leave the whole platform.
What do you mean SSS, FHE, PRE? What would you like to see?
A one-person oral history of Geocities HTML Chat
My dad worked for Mead Containers for many years. If he was reading this he would complain because technically 'cardboard' as everyone calls it is really 'corrugated'. The corrugated board is made from multiple layers of 'cardboard'.
They ship a distroless container image too. Fast and easy and just works. I switched after getting tired of babysitting PiHole.
I update them a few times per month; whenever I have some new pertinent info that I feel needs to be added.

I keep two separate copies --- in case of failure.
> Your compiler giving you a type check error is saying that the program is meaningless. What is the advantage of running a program that is known to be wrong?

Well one bit is you might not be looking at the meaningless part.

Sometimes when doing large refactorings or updates never getting to run, try, or look at anything is discouraging. It's a great feeling when it compiles and everything works (or near enough), but spending two days cycling between compiling and fixing compilation errors is not as enjoyable as e.g. seeing the unit test report's green bar tick up.

Maybe compilers should provide more enjoyable feedback, not just better error messages (though I fully support that movement).
This isn't even that new of a thing. The floppy disk drive sold for the Commodore 64 included it's own 6502 CPU, ROM, and RAM. This ran its own disk operating system[1]. Clever programmers would upload their own code to the disk drive to get faster read/writes, pack data more densely on the disk, and even copy protection schemes that could validate the authenticity of a floppy.

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodore_DOS
> which led them to break in very (very, very) ugly ways due to unrelated changes.

Sounds more like a problem with tight coupling than a problem with types per se. A function should not change behavior due to an "unrelated change", regardless of static or dynamic typing.
> Nothing particularly predatory here, but there is still a feeling of a false sense of security.

What danger could an online persona possibly present to you? "[...]a false sense of security" implies there's a danger
> Where does the math work out?

I cannot speak for Europe. But in the US, gasoline is $3.51/gallon, electricity is $0.166/kWh. The average car gets 24.2 mpg. The average EV goes 2.9 miles/kWh. The average miles per year driven is 14263. So the average EV driver will spend about $100 per month less on fueling.

But there's a lot of variability to that. You can buy a Chevy Bolt for $26.5K, it consumes 3.44 kWh/mi, and in Portland you can charge at night for $0.042/kWh. The lifetime fueling cost is less than one average new car payment.

A quick google search suggests gasoline is approximately twice as expensive in Europe, electricity three times as expensive, and miles driven about half. The fueling cost will be much closer, but the EV still comes out ahead.
He clearly said that IF someone is a dick about it / a prick he just ignores them.
SQL or NoSQL? These days it's a religious argument (tabs vs spaces, anyone?) I've been using SQL since the late 80's, and spent several years working with NoSQL offerings. There were some really great things about using a document-based database -- mainly being able to take a block of JSON from my front-end app and throw it into a database. That was great.

But over the years, some of my NoSQL projects made me start to yearn for those things that are super easy to do in SQL, but can be a pain with a document database. Quick aggregate queries to answer business questions: How much did we sell of this product last month in each region? Or I'd want to change the schema of my data, and it would be a pain to do that in a document database. I'd have to write a script to migrate the data, and then I'd have to change my code to use the new schema. Or else my code started filling up with code to manage the schema. if (typeof total_sale !== 'undefined')...

Once I figured out that it's easy to throw JSON data into Postgres, I was able to get the best of both worlds. I'm not saying SQL is always better -- it totally depends on the application and what your needs are. But I've also been bitten before by "oh this is easy to do in NoSQL because the data is just a simple document" followed three months later by "the app is working great -- but now can we do X, Y, and Z?" And I'm thinking "why didn't you ask for those things before we built the app? I should have done this in SQL." Ugh.

Your comments and questions are welcome!
Well if you think Google has that kind of power then a law that prevents Google from hosting healthcare data at all isn't gonna work either.
I've been wanting to go back to the office, at least part of the week, as I feel pretty isolated and detached from my team and miss some of the traditional office amenities like coffee and nearby restaurants. But every time I tell myself I'm gonna go to the office I never follow through. By the time I drop my kids off at school I'm just like "ahh f it, don't feel like commuting 30-40 min" and I end up working from home.
Ultimately the conveniences of wfh for someone with family responsibilities are tough to shake now that I've gotten into this habit
Not without breaking any NDAs.
To be honest, I think I would be more horrified. There is something surreal and disgusting about the thought of killing in such a way. Similar to the horror of the Rube Goldbergesque devices used in the Saw films. However, if you put it through a filter to make it look like a game and pull and Ender's Game on the user, you may get the psychological distancing you mention.
I like to joke that BPF-verified C is the future of memory-safe systems code, not Rust. It's a joke because you can't express most programs in verified BPF. The reason BPF is safe, despite the seeming theoretical impossibility of program verification, is that the verifier rejects most "valid" programs. To give a simple example: every loaded BPF program must provably halt, so any loop in a BPF program must be bounded in a way that the verifier can prove. And bounded loops, where you can see just from the AST that the loop can only tick N times, are a recent eBPF verifier innovation.

The way you build serious systems with BPF is that you couple a tiny straight-line BPF kernel that generates events with a userland program that consumes the events and does interesting stuff.
> Elon Musk is spacex and telsa, if spacex and telsa "are" vanguard/blackrock, then Elon Musk is one of their CEOs

SpaceX is also privately held. Vanguard has nothing to do with it, neither do I think BlackRock. With Tesla, they are holders, but largely through index funds. And Elon has control.

There is a public market index hypothesis, but it pointedly doesn’t apply to Elon or his companies.
It's not honesty or accuracy, it's a misunderstanding of the way language works.
This is something I’ve been feeling “all along”, but clearly the mental image of a typical Twitter use cases varies too much between stakeholders e.g. Mastodon backend devs, frontend Twitter app devs, casual users and heavy users. And Twitter employees, too.

To an addict like I am, Twitter timeline is something measured in tweets per second. It is a constant flow, a time synchronized operation, not something that I expect to be event based.

Mastodon devs and ActivityPub spec devs must have a complete opposite of that, that users only post content when there is something to say, and the post will be pushed when a post was made.

The latter model is certainly doable with the ActivityPub protocol, $20/month budget, and by stretch can be handled by Mastodon as it is built. But I think there is this misunderstanding, and it just seems that none of it is built to cater for those with the former model.
I was more surprised about the personality tests that were part of their interview process.
https://youtu.be/KqIOGGjPFQU

I find this to be the best concise explanation of the PN junction, which is enough to figure out how a transistor works on one’s own.
> The only way to win is to become a stooge.

I sometimes feel like that as a software dev, though, when management pushes some changes or "fixes" that aren't useful and won't fix anything.
No, sorry, what I mean is that all users on mastodon.social have a unique private inbox and then a "sharedInbox" value of "https://mastodon.social/inbox". Almost all deliveries (with appropriate "to" and "cc" targeting values that the receiving server can appropriately deliver to, i.e. individual actors or the special "followers" group for an actors) can be sent to the sharedInbox in bulk, but for private groups and some other special cases you may want to use direct delivery.
This is absolutely fantastic news, and MUCH more humane than letting the incapacitated die in public. We'll look back at this period in horror, and the ACLU bears much of the blame.
This is probably borderline flamebait, but my impression as an outsider looking in is that Richard Stallman not being as involved as he once was in setting policy for FSF projects held it back quite a bit.

Most notably, he had a long-time prohibition of any sort of FFI for both GCC and Emacs.

Yes, the reversal of that policy was more than 12 years ago at this point[1], but note how the first Emacs release with an FFI came out in late 2016[2]. Arguably it's only in the last couple of years that we've seen the floodgates open on the potential of that. E.g. TreeSitter & the SQLite interface in this upcoming Emacs 29 release is only there because of FFI.

I really respect what Stallman's done for the free software movement at large, but I think in this and a few other cases he was fighting yesterday's battles for around two decades too long.

1. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-03/msg00...

2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Emacs
I’ll offer a different take here.

More than 99% of the people whose information is listed in these registries are not corrupt public officials, Russian oligarchs, or [insert person you dislike here].

Public UBO registries do not strike a good balance between protecting the privacy of honest business owners and exposing corruption or whatever.
It pretty much is, by my dialect of English those are the same :)
And hospital IT workers have the horrorest of horror stories so hopefully this frees them up to not go bald by 35.
Rust’s type inference still requires you to manually specify the input and output types of every function. I think it’s clearly in the camp of “all types must be specified by the programmer / you get compiler errors”.

The GP asked what’s the point of languages like this. The two massive advantages in my mind are that compiled programs are usually correct, and compiled programs run really fast. I often have the experience in rust of writing hundreds of lines of new code, and my program works perfectly the first time I run it. That’s a delight.
This seems very weird. Where does this come from?

I'd assume none will guess correctly because you have countably infinite guesses from uncountably infinite set (the colors) so the set of guesses is very sparse, meaning pretty much none will hit it.

How on earth can almost all hit a point in a continuum exactly with random chance?
Why to reinvent the wheel and investing significant amount of money, resources and audits when it can be brought for cheaper.
Never as far as I know. Vaccinated, not especially cautious, not masking.
The return of Polish workers and falloff of new ones started several years before Brexit, as Poland started experiencing a lack of skilled builders and salaries grew significantly as a result. Exchange rate changes also contributed significantly. The same effect was seen elsewhere too, e.g. in Norway.

The first reports of a massively reduced influx goes as far back as 2008, which is also when we started seeing reports of a significant outflow w/the Home Office estimating in 2008 that about 25% returned.
> as a 35 year old engineer it seems the world in general has far fewer consequences than I was raised to expect.

I wouldn't say fewer uniformly, but certainly very noisy. Some have their lives destroyed for minor or non-existent misdeeds, others get away with egregious crimes.
AWS makes Lambda cold start latency a thing of the past with SnapStart
I just assumed oregon. Apparently the locals tell me, the owl scare of the 80s that killed most lumber companies on west coast, was simply lobbying and scare tactics by east coast lumber companies. And it worked very well. But who knows.
Epstein wasn't some one-dimensional cartoon villain who spent 100% of his time on his private island managing his evil enterprises.

He also had a pretty successful career in banking/finance/investing which made him a ton of money and was pretty active with that money as a philanthropist. He had a bazillion connections to leading businesspeople, politicians, celebrities, scientists, universities, and religious leaders due to those activities.

Because of that there is nothing really suspicious about someone being acquainted with Epstein. That's why there was not much of a stir previously when his contact list and the logs of passengers on his plane were leaked and widely distributed.
Generally speaking the vendor libraries have dynamic dispatch support, which can identify which functions are available on a CPU and then deploy to the best at runtime. Intel got into some hot water for having their dispatch hurt performance on AMD CPUs, but it seems that's been fixed. Their IPP-Crypto and AMD's AOCL-Cryptography libraries both support dynamic dispatch these days, for example.
tailwind has a `gap-x` class, too.
AFAIK in new york the wards were closed largely in response to abhorrent conditions exposed in a documentary at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willowbrook_State_School and other locations.
Disgrace of Gijón
They cite haskell which, if anything, has even stronger static typing and more powerful type inference (because the rust devs decided to favour explicit clarity and removed global type inference).

And as GHC actually has a compilation mode where it only warns about compilation errors: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/wikis/defer-errors-to-r...

So they're 0/2, on the subject they're espousing upon, through a language they mentioned.
> they get their number by considering how much gas would have been used if all the miles driven by EV had instead been driven by a similar gas-consuming vehicle.

That wasn't clear to me from the article. I gathered (incorrectly) that the numbers were based off amount of gasoline sold. Thanks for the clarification.
I'm not sure what you mean. Deduplication by hash is free and exactly how Dropbox works, as I recall.
In https://asahilinux.org/2022/03/asahi-linux-alpha-release/ it says that 4k pages work on the HW but 16k has tome advantages. Dropping 4k page size supporrt would imply a departure from arm architecture compatibility compatibility I think, it might have also nontechnical problems (ARM license).
I think you may have extended what I'm talking about in ways I didn't intend; there was no sloppy language.

The transmission infrastructure needs cooling off time, not the generation.

Base load has to be completely changed if we consider charging EV's at a population level, which changes how we look at renewables that aren't around the clock (i.e. solar).

To be clear I'm 100% behind getting rid of ICE, coal, gas, etc. as soon as we can. That doesn't mean there aren't assumptions that won't have to be challenged.

As for my background and experience, I worked in Nuclear Power generation. I'm not a complete domain expert, but neither am I speaking from a place of no experience.
yah, there's no instance called Mastodon, Mastodon we can consider at the meta transcendent level of the universe of instances. The union of each essentially.
I checked it hopefully... But it's basically a small book, or at least the huge TOC makes it look that way. I don't think I would share that with someone unless they're really interested in mastodon.

Is there a summary that can be read <5 minutes?
Of course some people do it more than others. My point is that no political movement can be fully and correctly defined purely by such tactics. If one says "the modus operandi of tribe X is to lies and bad faith," one is never wrong but one is also always omitting a huge part of the story. To reduce an enemy political movement to "just based on lies and bad faith" is to fail to know that enemy. And when you don't know your enemy you will lose to them
if you torture data long enough, it will confess to anything
New York operates differently - this won't hit the courts, and the local Federal circuit court is essentially an arm of the state. MAYBE the Feds could get involved, but I'm willing to bet they let this run for a bit to see if it helps. The status quo is awful, and all alternative proposals seem to start with "once we dismantle capitalism,..." which is not going to happen.
You manage this complexity the same way you manage the complexity of repeated code nearly anywhere else: you encapsulate. If you have a standard box (div + styles) that you use everywhere, abstract it in whatever way you're writing your application allows. For example, a component in React.
I don't want to discount how valuable this may be to you. However, for the average sysadmin, or developer who spends time in shells on many different machines, I would gently suggest that this is not a good idea. It's not a significant enough improvement over the way it works out-of-the-box to merit both (1) not getting used to Ctrl-r and (2) getting used to a different behavior for the arrow keys. Just my opinion, of course.
There was no EU system
I'm actually less concerned with the privacy implications (which are concerning) than with the idea of more "AI" in healthcare. AI is a shiny object that does not solve any of the most urgent problems in healthcare, and almost certainly distracts from them, while all the "quick wins" are going to be the usual automation of what should be personal interactions, making it worse for everyone that is not the "average" customer. AI investment in healthcare is for the benefit of the AI providers only. It is not going to benefit patients, certainly not vs other ways the money could be spent (more staff, more beds)
I didn’t give a definition of incite violence. Also said “provably” not “probably”. It’s not provably false that covid came from a lab.
I used modems going back to 1200 bps. Yeah, that sounds off in a number of ways to me.
Scaling up a Mastodon server to 128K active users
I've been driving elpaca for some weeks now and it is fairly usable. Very fast installs. Occasional jankiness (as is to be expected from alpha software)
Expand the Second Amendment to include personal robot armies
It is also only true of corporations. Nobody has to start a corporation in order to run a business. You can be a sole trader and keep everything to yourself. If you want the protection of a corporation you have to pay for it with a level of transparency. Seems fair to me
I'm on Windows but use WSL exclusively. It opens the frame seamlessly. I'm about to build 29 from source because my Ubuntu ppa doesn't have a prepackaged 29 build.

I personally believe it's a good thing for a developer to have an intimate relationship with the construction of their primary tooling. It feels right to me, even if it hurts adoption.