skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You may want to look into the life of factory farmed pigs, for example, before you conclude which life is worse than the other. I would certainly prefer to be a wild pig over a factory farmed one.
'Distruption' usually skirts and outright ignores laws. A lot of this requires RN to do the work and Doctors to oversee everything, So it'll cost a lot period. You'll not find anyone to risk their medical license for you. There is a shit ton of paper work and if things aren't documented correctly, everyone can get in trouble. A lot of the issue is the consolidation of the industry, which is usually the issue.
Wisdom teeth removal is actually one of the things they default to, that it is less clear they should default. Though, I don't know how to square your thoughts here. Prime example of how private enterprises control costs? Or a lot of quackery and cosmetic only? These seem at odds.

I'm not sure what the distinction between private and for-profit is. Can you elaborate?
Three months is a long time to wait when building something. Seems like for even for specialty applications, it’s going to make sense for someone to grow them in standard shapes, keep inventory, and ship on demand, possibly cutting them to size. This will add expense, so the application better be worth it.

Compare with 3D printing where print times are usually less than typical shipping times.
1. A software to write and run whole system and software merely from text prompts.

2. Use software produced via (1) to build more software to catch every bit of data from the human body, analyze and superimpose it with data and knowledge to recommend and administer treatments to reverse aging or heal the body.

3.Use software produced by (1) to explore and invent new products , natural laws to feed into a knowledge system (produced again by number (1).

4. Use this loop to jumpstart a software engine that monitors and automatically understands humanity’s needs and produce and run software to solve them at global scale.

As to the last question the best thing to benefit humanity is a software system that determines policies at all level of governance based completely on data (including voting data) and removing bias from the systems.
Wow, I had never heard of it, thank you so much for the link!
86%[0] of livestock feed is inedible by humans. They consume forage, food-waste and crop residues that could otherwise become an environmental burden. 13% of animal feed consists of potentially edible low-quality grains, which make up a third of global cereal (not total crop) production. All US beef cattle spend the majority of their life on pasture and upcycle protein even when grain-finished (0.6 to 1).

[0]http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/home/en/news_archive/2017_More...
Your doomsday scenario affects all online security equally. The only outcome you are partially vindicated in is one with a quantum miracle in the short term, which even then is not catastrophic for protocols which make the necessary hard forks.
Those requests are really high for that area. The hub is in Boone County where the median individual income is $38k. $30/hr would be almost double that for a full-time worker, and roughly on par with a nurse or mid-level SWE living in Cincinnati (the nearest major city). That's before even talking about 22 days off per year.

I don't think they're going to get those demands, but maybe they're starting high so they have some room to negotiate.
I'd love an iOS homescreen widget that shows them every day! I have one for the Wikipedia picture of the day that I enjoy.

I'm seriously considering making one if there isn't one already...
No, when you bought an NFT for X Coins, at the same time you could have bought Y dollars.

So, the NFT did really cost Y dollars and if it's trading at Z, you have lost Y-Z dollars
The animals that we have been breeding for ages are pretty far removed from their wild counterparts of yore.

Also, there's a lot of homeless people that would live better as my slaves, but you'd probably still rather see them free.
Cringy/pandering, yes. Something to do with turning a news story as boring as 'It is now legal to cross the road.' into a 832 word salad.
Let us not forget this comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22336284
Apple restricts AirDrop to 10 minutes in China amid anti-government protests
That's because Zen 4 runs AVX-512 by breaking them up over two cycles. Zen 4 AVX-512 is "double pumped".
Not to mention the risk of contamination wrecking entire batches. This technology doesn't scale well, because in order to scale it up to be economically feasible, they also increase the likelihood of contamination, which destroys the entire batch.
I disagree that consteval is what constexpr should have been. It's great to have a function that can work both at compile time and at runtime. `std::max` being a simple & obvious such example. You of course need that at runtime, that's the classic verison. But why shouldn't it be able to happen at compile time? That's a silly restriction.

And thus 'constexpr' - it can run in both modes, depending on when & where it's called.

'consteval' then is for when it must happen at compile time, which is a rather narrow (but very useful!) subset of constexpr.

Now, what is silly is that `if constexpr` is only allowed to happen at compile time. That should have been `if consteval` instead, the ordering of these additions is unfortunately reversed.
BlockFi Files for Bankruptcy
> Producing meat in the lab “will never be done with anything remotely like the economics you need for food,” Pat Brown, founder of the plant-based meat company Impossible Foods, told the Post last year.

Whether correct or not, this kind of reporting always seems silly to me. You're not interviewing an impartial expert on the subject, you're getting a quote from a direct competitor. Of course, they're going to say something along these lines. This important nuance will be lost on most readers.
Nowadays I fear many UX researchers are hired to find reasons for whatever silly design decision someone in power wants to do.

Or perhaps all the "easy pickings" have been picked and there's not much left.
Extremely unimaginably harder to produce to working immune system in a lab alongside your cell culture soup you want to market as “meat”.

Like, an immune system needs to be trained, needs to be maintained, needs plumbing, needs waste removal…

Kinda like the difference between playing catch in the backyard and launching rockets to outer space?

Plus all that extra stuff is almost certainly not tasty.
Unique Formula Identifier
How many people genuinely care about their parents' wellbeing and how many are just happy to ship them to a facility, provided it mets a minimal standard of care? It's an earnest question - I wonder what the proportions are.
My cat loves it when I'm up at 3. I take the opportunity to read a little. I usually get drowsy after a dozen or two pages, and get back to sleep.

But here's the wierd one... if I wake up an hour before my alarm, I'll get up, drink a coffee, and go straight back to bed. I reliably wake up a minute before my alarm goes off, feeling amazing.
For nerds: A stable cross-language, cross-OS FFI. Closest we have is C, but it's showing its age and won't always work that well. There are maybe problems around ownership but it's mostly a fuckton of engineering (and realistically, getting vendors on board with the idea...).

For mankind in general: A simple way to self-host/access self-hosted content. People ought to be able to own their own data without gargantuan efforts.
"Sterile conditions" isn't really a thing without temperatures high enough to cook the meat.
Okay you appear to be right!

Running `yarn info -AR | wc -l` gets me 3,413, and I get the same number for `cat yarn.lock | rg '^".+":$' | wc -l`

I remember running `yarn install` before we switched to `yarn 2` used to get us some absolutely insane number of packages being fetched in the 20k+ range, which is where my number came from, but I hadn't looked at it again in quite a while. I'll update my original comment. (edit: nvm it's too old to update, oh well)
I just want to eat actual cow meat that doesn't involve any suffering.
Yeah, that's illegal though and if you do that you cannot send your cattle for slaughter.
not even remotely true.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle_inspection_in_the_Unit...
It sounds like the title effected a change in your affect.
Not Giving him money == "Destroying free speech"

Ridiculous.
I actually want to ask the reverse question: why is it not popular for mainframe manufacturers to rent out their cores and rams and storages for non banking/insurance businesses? Is it because of the cost?
Some changes are really cool, but then marred by bizarre UX decisions that make absolutely zero sense to me and make things everything more tedious and difficult and I'm wondering how they're making these decisions. It's not being made by somebody who actually cares about Windows users.
I wasn't trying to say anything deep. It was just a reference to the Arianne 5 disaster.
Just count the number of employees to get the total headcount.
Except they're not, because they're illegal. You cannot sell livestock that have been fed growth hormones.
When we think about human suffering we don’t immediately go and compare it to the Neolithic period. I’m not arguing that animals are human, but it’s a false comparison. The correct comparison would be to compare it to if we didn’t do this. It just means there wouldn’t be factory farms and cows wouldn’t exist in the quantity (and evolutionary state) that they do now.
Ask HN: Do you know any good paid newsletters?
Do you have any links to share for quality fee-based newsletters?

- No advertisements.

- Any subject, language or country can be interesting.

- Paper, email or RSS based.

- Written. No video or audio podcasts.

- Not too much editorialism or buzz, just information.

I have almost completely abandoned the sponsored newspaper press, which only transcribes the ambient psychosis and the big media agencies.

I'm looking for new sources, there's a lot of good stuff in blogs, specialized press and podcasts, but I've recently seen some old-fashioned paid newsletters in the field of economics and I find the model interesting but not widespread outside of economics and societal circles.
IDK what they're talking about but I could imagine a pathogen that evolved on real animals having a field day at a meat farm without an immune system to fight back it would be reliant on the human operators cleanliness and other procedures.

Granted it might be much harder to have the initial infection happen in the first place since it's just a chunk of meat in a lab (no animal to walk around and get injured or otherwise interact with the environment, no poop, no lungs etc).

It will be interesting to see this technology develop.
We give our food water, but it doesn't quench our thirst. We give our food grass, but it doesn't tear up our teeth. Our food has poop in it, but doesn't taste of poop. Is there any evidence that steroids which are digested by a cow linger in its body as an active substance for years, in a large enough quantity to have a steroid effect after going through another creature's digestive system?

Isn't obesity rather well explained by cheap easily available food, carb heavy diet and increasingly sedentary lifestyle?

Otherwise, cows grow to much bigger than people, much quicker than people do. Why don't their natural growth hormones affect us in the same way?
An animal does not choose to live a wild or farm life. I assume that fewer farmed animals does not increase the number of wild animals.
Ruby on Rails

Add some gems like avo-admin/jumpstart and you'll have fully featured(CRUD operation) app within few hours.
If you put cattle on farmland, and utilize regenerative agriculture techniques, it costs a bit more, because yields aren't artificially boosted while destroying the topsoil. In return you actually capture carbon into the grasses from the atmosphere. That would normally just rot, but the herbivores digest it and make it bioavailable for the fungi and bacteria in the soil, where the carbon accumulates.

The herbivores are key component of sustainable agriculture, you can't do it without them. Lab grown meat is an interesting, energy intensive step in the wrong direction.

I think we can all agree that there are problems with factory farming, and grain finishing livestock.
The accumulated events and decisions over the lifespan of the company.

What's done in house, what's done elsewhere? What "bus factor" do you want your engineering teams to have? What events have left scars on the organization? What prejudices and preferences does the executive leadership have? How does the company handle the fiefdom builders who hire just to make their org size increase? How does the company handle attrition?

It's not like there's one "correct" staffing for a large company. There's hundreds of factors, some large some small, that add up over time. The company has goals to reach and problems to solve as each of those decisions are made, and those evolve as the company evolves.
Perhaps it was competition with decentralized stable-coin lending protocols offering decent APR for the risk that drove and legitimized such reckless behavior. At least the decentralized protocols were auditable from day 0.
The same could be said for FTX. There just needs to be regulation about how sound the self-created coin backing your margin needs to be. Without regulation of the soundness of the economic value of your self-created coin you get a crypto crash.

Am I crazy? Are we not describing 2 identical problems and classifying 1 of them as fraud?

The soundness of loans in a deregulated environment is no better than the soundness of a self-invented currency.
I've worked with both SwiftUI (iOS/Mac) and Jetpack Compose (Android).

Surprisingly, I've found that Compose is hands-down better on both the "developer experience" front as well as the "UI quality" front

SwiftUI is "clever" and it's a black box. You get what you get, and Apple steers you away from customising too much. Compose is open source. I can see how the high level components have been built from lower-level primitives—and I can do the same.

SwiftUI provides a set of Views and modifiers from Apple, and that's about it (without dropping into UIKit/AppKit, which is costly). Compose is lower-level. For example, a "Button" component in SwiftUI is a black box. I can modify it in a few basic ways, but that's it. Whereas in Compose, I can customise anything. Including jumping into the implementation of "Button", and referencing that to build my own fully custom implementation.

SwiftUI is at the bleeding edge of the Swift type system, and you're always fighting with it. You quickly start getting compile errors if your method bodies are deemed too complex ("The compiler is unable to type-check this expression in reasonable time; try breaking up the expression into distinct sub-expressions"). Customising views with styling protocols is a mess too. Compose doesn't make me think about the type system. Rather than returning views, Compose functions render them. This makes a huge difference.

After using Compose, I think Apple have made a real design mistake with SwiftUI by relying too heavily on hacking the Swift type system.
Blind taste-testing overwhelmingly favors feedlot-finished beef.
"And hopefully it'll eventually be cheaper than growing animals too."

Just as simply planting a tree and letting the sun provide the energy for it's growth will always beat those "synthetic trees" people like to hype from time to time, I can expect to never see a synthetic process that is more cost effective to create "meat" than simply letting nature do it's thing. Down here in Brazil you basically give the animals it's vaccines and let them graze for a few years, you can't beat that. And btw, I'll rather starve than eat anything syntesized that can be made, cheaper and for sure tastier, naturally.
Starter replacement on my strait-six LX450 took ~1 hr. Pull the wheel and you're practically looking at the unit. OTOH the Birfield Joints are kind of like prehistoric CV joints and have to be rebuilt in-situ. I love mine, 400k+ miles, still going strong and slurping fuel at 14 mpg.
Tiny addendum since I missed the edit window. I was referring to the mining industry.

For extra context… it’s sort of telling that I didn’t notice that word missing. That’s how pervasive the mining industry is in Western Australia, it’s a huge percentage of our economy, and has literally shaped this city (Perth) sociologically speaking.

I will happily argue till I’m out of breath my theory that Perth’s world leading level of suburban sprawl is almost entirely due to the significant percentage of “fly in, fly out” (FIFO) jobs, if you only commute once or twice a month to and from the airport; you give zero fucks about that commute being one two or even three hours drive… not even exaggerating, there are people who take multi hour regional trains or drive 1.5 to 3 hours in slow traffic to the airport on the days they fly out… hours heading to Perth airport to fly out to the farthest reaches of WA to did valuable rocks from the ground. This entire city had been irreparably harmed by the “FIFO lifestyle” and its just such a part of the culture at this point I do not have any expectations that we can turn this ship around … valuable jobs for men and women that in years past paid off houses in under a decade, but required you to spend half to two thirds of your time away from that house have distorted social normal to a ludicrous degree in so many weird ways… it’s sort of reminiscent of the weirdness of several other cities like Phoenix Arizona, and Los Angeles, and middle eastern cities with the migrant workers, but as with every city it’s also entirely it’s own.

But this is just context. Don’t let it distract from my point about how an entire industry full of attractive jobs that women want to work in, has been pushing away women due to systemic culture issues.
imagine thinking this is possible at the scale required to satiate humanities appetite for meat.
A lot of negative comments here but these keywords seem perfectly reasonable to me. If I actually have a place where I'd need them, I'd be able to understand which one to use and why.

I like to be able to do more compile-time evaluation and it's definitely a lot less confusing now than abusing templates for that.
Sorry to say but you're mistaken, these are all fad diets and it's not really disputed. If you think they become elevated to something greater because of a few hangers on who haven't switched to Dr McFuck's Green Purée diet (or whatever the next one is) then you're mistaken - there are still people on Atkins, for example, a classic fad diet.

The pattern is that a miracle diet is announced that promises guaranteed results, over the course of a few years a load of people get on board, each individual loses a lot in the first few weeks but most gain it back (true for all diets). In the meantime people make bank selling courses and books and pitching it as the central component of their Success Win Lifestyle, until the next one comes along and the cycle repeats.

If one of those fad diets are working for you, great - stick with it. But don't worry, there will always be another one around the corner.
And yet that's where all the meat I eat comes from, and indeed most of the meat eaten in this country.
Chiappa Rhino
That’s correct. The challenge is that ensuring purity of ingredients during production is tricky at scale. A small mistake could ruin a large batch of food, lowering total yields and raising costs.

Ideally the production process would include something analogous to the immune system to make it more robust. For certain contaminants simple outcompetition by probiotics might suffice.
Are the companies getting costs under control? I remember reading an article last year [1] about how the cost curve isn't looking favorable.

1: https://thecounter.org/lab-grown-cultivated-meat-cost-at-sca...
Its not no soldering but it is low effort soldering. Pulling from a couple guides here.

Tasmota is local first.

Get a wemos D1 and a https://www.ikea.com/us/en/p/vindriktning-air-quality-sensor...

https://tasmota.github.io/install/ flash the unofficial all sensors build.

https://github.com/Hypfer/esp8266-vindriktning-particle-sens... Solder as follows GND to GND on ESP, 5V to 5V on ESP and finally the last one to D2 on the ESP.

Guides I am stealing from. https://github.com/Hypfer/esp8266-vindriktning-particle-sens... Has most of the hardware side. But its using a different software.

https://blakadder.com/vindriktning-tasmota/ is where I got most of the rest of the info but he uses a separate voltage regulator. If you use the Wemos D1 Mini you should not need that.

After that the internet has plenty of info for hooking tasmota and say home assistant together.
I 'm pretty sure we already eat far more shady stuff than industrially grown cells.
Samsung rumored to be in talks for ARM
The sterile conditions become more fragile and easily contaminatible the larger the batch gets. So they need to increase the size of batches to make it economically viable, but increasing batch sizes makes it more likely to get contaminated, which kills the whole batch. Then you have to dispose of bio-waste material that has been contaminated in a safe and economic fashion, which is a whole different set of problems.
It's also a way for Monotype, a near monopoly, to build interest in its overpriced font packages and speed its consolidation of the industry.

H&Co was a bastion of independent type design, a practice that was as innovative as it was profitable amid competition from giants like Monotype and Adobe Fonts, as well as the proliferation of free typefaces on Google Fonts. To see H&Co gobbled up by Monotype was a great blow felt by solo practitioners and small studios, who worry that a profit-driven corporation is increasingly dictating the terms and conditions of how their work is priced and distributed.

https://qz.com/2068310/what-monotypes-purchase-of-hoeflerco-...
Collectibles are their own thing. I'll allow that there is some value in the preservation of the item itself. But the reality is that with collectibles, it's the scarcity that's the thing. And with digital goods, scarcity is artificial.

Your lumber comparison is vastly over-simplifying an issue to make it look similar. Lumber is useful. It has value as a building material.

I've yet to see a cryptocurrency/NFT/whatever that has any value outside of its own ecosystem. I also like how you say the "new entrants condition does not qualify anything as a ponzi scheme" before pasting the definition which says "the promoter pays out current investors with the money of new investors".

Which is how crypto works. That's the only source of increased value, new investors. The only quibble is that there's not a single promoter. In which case, fine. Crypto is not a ponzi scheme. Crypto is a vehicle by which people can easily create a whole bunch of ponzi schemes.
Design Patterns, Smalltalk, and the Lost Art of Reading Code
The FDA has approved all of the growth hormones currently in use. [1] So how is that any worse than growing the entire thing in a lab? If anything lab-grown meat is a more extreme version biological engineering.

[1] https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/product-safety-informa...