skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't think so.

VSCode, Atom (and Jupyter) all run natively, only using a browser renderer for UI.

Jupiter already uses a browser as the front end, but the kernel runs natively.

JupiterLite runs entirely in the browswer, including the kernel. This means you don't need Jupyter installed or running on a server to execute the kernel. But it also means the kernel is running much slower in Web Assembly.
JSON logs would be obvious example here
Most of these go away if you remove social features.

Maintenance is not a problem. Most of the supposed maintenance burden of self-hosting a website is FUD from cloud-provider marketing.

Like I spend probably like 60 minutes a month on maintenance, and I operate a dang search engine on my server. Sure I'm not getting five nines, but who cares. (There is additional operational work, but that's orthogonal to how and where its hosted)
Giving teams more insights into their apps at runtime without requiring changes to the apps is as close as one gets to a superpower.
>> I always find it interesting how when these things get revealed, nobody seems to update their priors on "conspiracy theories" going forward. A couple weeks after these stories break it's back to making fun of "tinfoil hat" people and acting like it's all a big joke. I wonder if it's some kind of deep seated coping mechanism to refuse to update beliefs on stuff like that.

> This is a classic example of a fallacious argument. Just because (whatever about Epstein, an n of 1) is true doesn't mean that JFK was assassinated by the mob or anti-Communists, or that 9/11 was an inside job, or that US elections are routinely rigged, or that lizard people secretly run our government from inside of the hollow Earth or whatever. There's no connection between these claims- they still have to be evaluated separately

This is a classic example of a human being perceiving/describing reality in a way that is clearly and objectively not true....like, not even close.

Here you are explicitly making a claim that someone has argued something that they have not actually argued.

Your claim IS FALSE. And yet, you are criticizing the other person for "a fallacious argument". You do not only have it wrong, you have it BACKWARDS.

My intuition is that you are not intentionally being deceptive, but rather have done this accidentally. I am curious to know whether believe my intuition to be correct, or have any other comments about what is taking place here today?
The never-ending word games with food packaging/marketing is frustrating (infuriating?). Sometimes it's manufacturers complying with the letter of packaging regulations while (IMHO in bad faith) violating them in spirit, some is with the food industry corrupting the regulations themselves.

> stone-ground whole wheat flour

This is just one in a sea of examples. A small % of consumers get wise to the fact that hyperprocessed flour that's industrially ground into a fine powder isn't as healthy as stone ground. Food industry responds by labeling bread "stone ground" that has none of the properties that make that make stone-ground bread superior:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stoneground_flour

> In the USA flour only has to 'pass between stones' once during its manufacture to be regarded as stoneground, and it has been claimed that a significant proportion of flour sold as stoneground in the USA has not been processed in this way, being ordinary roller-ground wholemeal.

So not only is the food industry going to produce a bunch of poisonous/unhealthy crap for the sake of profits that's making our entire country sick, the small % of people who do some research and go out of their way to find needle-in-a-haystack healthier selections are going to be duped as well.
Anyone remembers the vanilla tailwind implementation? It's called the `style` attribute.
Legally, sure.

In a society with a court of public opinion, the exact opposite is true.
Thanks - Most of my goals do require wealth. However, the last couple months I started doing what I can now with the resources I have and it has helped tremendously. But also made me more eager.
Epicycles of Thought
I have only heard “show me the data” when someone wants someone else to support a claim. I do not see why this would necessarily be a bad thing.
That’s exactly why it’s deceptive.

Most people think of “private” as between the conversation parties, not everyone in the conversation, the company, and any government with leverage on them.

Encryption at rest prevents from some intrusion attacks but does absolutely nothing against a warrant if the government has leverage.
> The people that know CSS don't want to learn new classnames when they can use CSS and that is a standard.

And then they end up with dozens (and in big project hundreds) of bespoke CSS class names that no one can remember or keep track of, and just add new ones to the ever expanding file ;)
The time has come for gnu console and linux filesystems to support emoji characters for command names and filenames. In Windows 10 you can name your files and folders with emojis.
Hi everyone

I’m Jonathan, I work full time as a software developer at a small startup company.

Currently I’m working on a tool for creating and managing courses for developers and just launched a landing page to try and validate my idea. Any feedback / advice / tip would be greatly appreciated .

Here’s the landing page: https://www.lecturekit.io
So far I'm mostly limiting my search to organizations with single page applications, and unfortunately over time I've gotten comfortable with filling out applications through specific ATSes. So, for example if an employer uses Greenhouse, I know basically what to expect and how to fill stuff in.

Also, in case you didn't know, a job that shows up at for example boards.greenhouse.io may show up embedded at example.com/jobs?gh_jid=123 if you navigate to it through the employer's jobs page. It may not matter in the end but when that happens I prefer submitting through the example.com URL instead of the greenhouse.io URL. This is one reason I want a link directly to the employer's main site.
I ride a Harley and have ridden a few other bikes and can tell you a little more about this.

First off, the exposed engine isn't what makes a vehicle loud, unless you count the valve train noise and primary chain noise which honestly is negligible compared to everything else. What makes a Harley loud is the fact that it doesn't have a resonator muffler but basically a pipe with a baffle. Example of a resonator muffler: https://www.quadratec.com/sites/default/files/knowledge_base.... Example of a motorcycle muffler: https://thekneeslider.com/images/hddynamicexhaust.jpg

Second, a modern stock Harley tops out at 79 dB which is below the EPA requirement of 80 dB. This is no louder than a modern car. In California specifically this is also enforced and you can't (to a first approximation) register a vehicle that exceeds this (CARB regulation).

Most Harley you hear that are loud use aftermarket muffler or full exhaust systems (larger diameter, no catalytic converter, etc.) which are labeled as "for closed course only" because they aren't street legal. Still, motorcycles by and large can outrun cop cars so nobody bothers pulling them over. Also, most police officers don't carry dB meters to be able to determine if after you registered the vehicle you swapped the exhaust system.

Now for the reason: yes it makes a huge difference in the feel of you on the bike. The sound is half the equation. And no that doesn't justify bothering all your neighbors, but it is a visceral feeling you can't get any other way. Some people want it and will break the law to get it.

The good news for you is that bikes are getting quieter and more efficient and most people are realizing the effects of hearing loss from long term exposure to loud exhausts. However you will never get everyone to stop: there will always be a small minority that wants a loud vehicle and people who don't participate in this activity will always have a hard time understanding why.

If you want to have an experience, take a week off, rent a muscle car, and ride it cross country on a road trip. It'll be life changing, I promise.
How to self manage yourself while being employed?
Hi HN, I work at a FAANG-tier company and wanted to know how you folks know when you’re over-committing to work vs your personal goals (for example being a founder).

What I mean is, how would you know if you are spending way too much time or effort improving for work (learning company specific tech or related) vs working on improving your own skills. I am beginning to see that these things are necessarily related, you could get really good at using your orgs tools and procedures but still be a mediocre dev or not know about things like product design.

At the same time overcommitting to things outside work (which improve your other skills) may also make you a mediocre employee, is it a straight trade-off for you folks or there is some sort of balance?
Corporations own assets, assets can be damaged by acts of violence, QED violence can be directed at corporations.
There is lots of behind the meter installed as well in CA which are not captured in the linked doc. Hard to find good numbers but CA senate estimates 20GW of nameplate. Assuming a 15% capacity factor that is 2/3 of that 43k GWh. They assume it will double by 2030.

Even assuming your other numbers are correct on total energy needed, your conclusion doesn’t follow since more imports can be found (or more import capacity built). The western interconnect is regional but your analysis assumes state-level constraints.
> The median data scientist is horrible at coding and engineering in general. The few who are remotely decent at coding are often not good at engineering in the sense that they tend to over-engineer solutions, have a sense of self-grandeur, and want to waste time building their own platform stuff (folks, do not do this).

I can relate to this so much. I've worked in multiple projects with great people who shifted away from solving the problem at hand, to instead construct some sort of generic problem-solving platform. In one project this actually happened twice: after refactoring the beef out of our SpecificProblemSolvingService into GenericProblemSolvingService, the generic problem-solving platform was then rewritten with one extra level of abstraction, so it could run any models designed to solve any task. As far as I know, neither service was ever used to solve any other problem except the SpecificProblem that we were solving the first place.

But it's fun writing platforms, I guess?
I went with the pihole in docker approach with a Ubuntu 22.04 machine. Pretty smooth, I had a few quirks with docker desktop for linux that might not show up otherwise. Definitely my recommendation too.
How many average users are even aware of this?

It took until 2021 for people to figure out that quote-tweeting politician hot takes to dunk on them, actually helped politicians' reach because Twitter counted it as engagement.
this is a misconception. https://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/justices-rule-po...
Craig Strete[1] has a short story about "womb-cops" that patrol the streets from the safety of a command centre and "burn down" people who break the law. I think the likelihood of increased use of deadly force in a remote situation is quite high.

[1]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Strete
My favorite is that those can combined with the shift key, to get native highlighting. So Ctrl-Shift-a works like Shift-Home on windows (and Ctrl-Shift-e for Shift-End).

So you can do C-s-a and C-s-e, followed by cmd-C, to copy stuff to the native clipboard.

(Kill and yank (C-k and C-y) work too, but not across applications.)
Delivery apps often have a rating where it will list the dishes with the option to thumbs or thumbs down. My instinct is always to click each item going down the list down the list but after clicking the first thumbs up a text box asking what you like pops up. It's terrible. The workaround: thumbs up each item moving up from the bottom of the list so that the text box popping up doesn't interfere. Bottomline, if users are working around your UI instead of through it; your UX is terrible.
It’s possible and how to do it is public. Signal has encrypted group chats across devices already and is open source.
Data science effectively rebranded statistics but removed the requirement of deep statistical knowledge to allow people to get by with a cursory understanding of how to get some python library to spit out a result.

I dont know anything about Data Science but as a bystander with a mathematical background thats what I assumed was going on so its kindof interesting to see it spelt out like that. Like you've put words to a preconception that I didnt even know I had.
From that article: "Both Level 1 and Level 2 charging utilizes alternating current (AC)"
So they're the art school equivalent of those engineers who think they have really great ideas about something far outside their field based on something they misheard once. Of course, in a world where "The Cremaster Cycle" is considered High Art, I should expect nothing less.
Ironically this was shared with me after one of the startups I worked at failed.
You could just use Tailscale.
Will it eventually be possible to use technology to make plant-based meat taste identical to real meat? Yes.

Will it be cheaper to manufacture this future plant-based meat than real meat? Very likely yes.

Then, it seems obvious that eventually everyone eating meat will switch to plant-based meat.

The real question is if BYND will survive this technology shift. Whoever does will have at least tens of billions in revenue (and be worth some multiple of that) given that the current size of the meat industry is $1.3t (1% market share = $13b). At a $800m market cap, the stock seems cheap.
Is this how we get Robocop killing hobos?
> So it is perfectly reasonable for balenciaga to assert that they didn't know about this document

High fashion photoshoots are a multi layered production. Several people would have viewed these photos, edited, adjusted, filtered out bad shots, etc prior to this campaign being released. The fact that no one seemed to bat an eye at a judicial opinion including the words "child sexualization" seems concerning. No special knowledge is required.
Is it actually spam? More looks like a manually curated quote / link.
I tried to use tramp based setup, but ran into many edge cases. Even popular libraries like flycheck doesn't support tramp very well. Eventually I found mosh and that settled the problem. Mosh + iterm2 + terminal emacs[1] combination works very well. Except a few missing features (fringe, variable font size/multiple fonts), nearly everything else works well.

1: https://ananthakumaran.in/2021/07/31/emacs-remote.html
Imagine if you will a police budget, police resources and jail space. Now imagine cities where every available police officer in the city is processing paperwork for misdemeanor theft. Its untenable by any means. There simply is not the resources, officers and time to be processing thousands of misdemeanors. How many officer hours would it take to process a stolen bike report, investigate and then arrest someone. Then bring the DA in on that stolen bike case. This isn't some leftist dream gone dystopian. If anything it's a fiscal conservatism and using public resources appropriately.
How can they write all that but then not include a translation of the letter?
> What happens when you fake danger

So what, you go up to a bank, with a fake gun, and then say "lul, I was just robbing you as a prank bro?"

Probably the same thing will happen to you, as would happen to you right now, if you pointed a fake gun at someone.
Just an fyi for people using straight or interested in it, its maintainer is working on an alternative called elpaca.

https://github.com/progfolio/elpaca
That's exactly what I said. It will not reverse, ever. The only thing you can do is the only thing anyone has ever been able to do: change their own behavior. And that is very easily possible.

I am not suggesting that everyone will change. I am suggesting that you, reading this text, chose to change. Or not, but I figure people on HN definitely have the positive liberty to be able to.
I can’t answer your question specifically, I’m not up to date on the latest developments. But I do think it’s worth mentioning, generally speaking, that light is harder to deal with than electricity. It requires bigger structures and those structures are inherently lossy. I think the issue has always been related to signal deterioration as the light propagates and the inability to “store” light, like how you can store a charge. This is a fundamental problem with using light and I wouldn’t expect some new engineering effort to overcome it. Speaking as an optical engineer.
Yeah, it's annoying, it's all political reasons too AFAICT.

LE is also verboten because of stipulations from Certain Government Departments. There was definitely pushback years ago about just using LE because "it's bad for security" which effectively translated to "we don't trust it because it's free and we have less control over the domains issued". Hopefully that mindset changes now that LE is well-established.

Also should be noted that technically most of the domains are owned/purchased by the research councils (govt level) and they buy certificates which cover like 100 different domains (wtf, this seems ripe for domain-squatting) at a time, so at least they're getting their moneys worth out of those certificate renewals. So it takes even longer for us to get certs because the _research council(s)_ are busy batch-renewing certs for multiple institutions they're involved with.

Individual research projects also end up with their own domains that one EU country pays for, another country hosts, and a third one manages, because they all met up for beers in Brussels for a kickoff meeting and decided that was the fairest way of doing it. Each institutions IT department trying to make sense of the chaos which the principal investigators are creating, "seek forgiveness rather than permission" :-)
> Are your customers not sophisticated? Are they unable (or unwilling) to follow up on defects and outright lies?

You would probably be depressed if you knew who our customers were, and how technologically unsophisticated they are.
Secondhand thin clients are pretty cheap. Something like hp t620 is ~$50 and uses <10W of power. Runs pi-hole just fine.
I firmly agree, but would make an even more specific recommendation to use the docker-compose setup so that redeploying the same customizations is easy. I do this on two different hosts so I have redundant DNS, and it's been working great for several years.

https://github.com/pi-hole/docker-pi-hole/blob/62ca934d07/ex...
I create a simple func for each handler to parse params. Most urls params are properly structured as /resources/{resourceID}/subresources/{subresourceID}.

So I can essentially create a map[string]string by splitting slashes and going 0 = key, 1 = value, 2 = key, 3 = value, etc.

If a handler uses a different structure like /resources/{resourceID}/{subresourceD}, I will have the func specifically handle that case.

Some ways may work better but this works for me and it's not magical, and I tend to touch that code once and never again so it's then out of the way, all in a file.
90% of US-based Seed-level investors will not invest in a foreign entity. 90% of investors also will consider a complex corporate setup (at pre-seed) to be a big red flag - questions of IP residency, financial/taxation obstacles, lack of alignment/prioritization among founders, etc. "U.S. only" is the right choice, especially after the crypto clown show of the last six months.

There is no issue with a US entity employing a person in the UK - your citizenship is irrelevant.
Justifying using Tailwind, Typescript, JS Framework, etc. comes down to how much value they provide to each user and how much time they save.

For example, building your own type system or JS framework would require a lot more code and man-hours than using margin: 4px vs m-2.
My first job basically consisted of taking code in FORTRAN and translating it into C++ with robust testing and engineering, and then frontending that code into a ton of spreadsheet packages. So you had quanta doing quant work, software engineers doing software engineering, and analysts and traders being analysts and traders, instead of having quants fail at all three, which is more or less what data science is.
People assuming personal responsibility for the consequences of their own choices? Oh the horror!
How will cops justify deadly force if they can't claim they feared for their safety?
NINA – Remember AOL, Aim, ICQ, Yahoo, Even Q-Link?
Events are discrete, right? Doesn’t everything then appear to be discete?
That's good to know. Thank you!
If you're up for it, I'd love to share an updated version with you once I've incorporated your feedback. If you are, let me know what the best way to get in touch with you is (my contact details are on the site)
That’s because your premise is weak. You argue that Django is the wrong choice for lots of projects but the counter factual is that our job is to figure that out. We have to choose the lesser evil.

It’s not convincing to just call everyone stupid. Everything is a trade off. You have no idea what those could be in any particular situation so that’s why your whole argument falls apart

Then you focus on construction and coding and ignore everything else a framework offers, which has downstream effects on coding and construction. It’s not all about the code. The coding is actually the easy part

The only projects ppl pay us is for the ones that are so large and complicated that if you don’t use frameworks, you’re going to either die or go crazy
> These seem to be adults dressed as literal demons (one of them has horns on their head) many of whom are carrying (probably fake) children, and all marching through the mud. It’s very unsettling.

No offense but that’s just a fashion show in a setting involving some mud in the background. It looks a bit like another planet rather than hell. Also there are no children here. I’m still looking for the disturbing part.

> This next thing is considerably worse since it appears to involve pictures of actual children (I won’t link it here since it’s NSFL).

The controversy is about pictures of kids carrying bags shaped as teddy bears in chains which can make one thinks of bdsm. I repeat: the teddy bears are in chains, not the kids. It’s in bad taste but very much SFL.

I have no clue about what’s actually happening at Balenciaga but I wish people kept to facts.
This is not the way either. I use CSS-in-JS which has its own flaws, but CSS stays with the component.
I would like a home, family and more flexibility in my schedule.
well do something else than coding, it's fun too
Won't arrest people for stealing, but wants lethal robots. JFC.
You wrote: <<Students, at least here in Europe, don't have the luxury of taking six or seven years for their basic diploma>>

Is this true in Germany?
It’s really too bad this stuff never worked in Node. It’s not a command line flag, it’s determined at compile time.
I agree completely, but if a data scientist should be a domain expert, surely we should just focus more on programming and quantitative skills in these fields?
The reason it won is "most popular(and only) web language used it".

I'm not saying it's bad, I'm saying it didn't won on technical merits.

I do dislike people using them for configs tho, even indented the readability is just "okay", the ease of change is worse than YAML (even with all it's problem), especially forcing no trailing `,` is just plainly obnoxious.
CyLab researchers design privacy icon to be used by California law
And how much space they'd need to clear in their cities to make room for those cars.