skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Maybe not a perfect comparison but I think it sounds very similar. "kut" on the other hand sounds like neither so not sure why you think I mean that.

cut - IPA(key): /kʌt/

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cut#Pronunciation

katt - IPA(key): /ˈkatː/

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/katt#Pronunciation_3

(there's audio on both links)
I guess of course I should not expect to see IronPython mentioned under the "Microsoft’s Commitment to Python" section.
I hope it does not become like node-chakracore and the "VM neutrality" and other farces intended to 3E node, but now with Python.

Or Microsoft R Open and MRAN, the 3E of R and CRAN.
Members do barter between each other, and members sometimes organize micro-credits between each other the central structure takes no percentage from those transactions. We encourage them to happen even if they are a bit more work with no moneraty compensation to the central structure. Whatever makes projects and cooperators thrive in the coop the management will very likely support it. It makes the whole ecossystem healtier and gives more reasons for people to want to be a contributing part of it.

We take 5% from goods and services sold through the cooperative to the outside world and that's what mantains the whole central structure.
These articles are kinda funny. The last article of that kind I was reading while walking Spanish streets full of people of all ages sitting around tables and talking for hours. When I first arrived there I felt how people are in general content and relaxed, despite not having salaries enough to buy every latest iphone.
Correction, there was a "Go!" programming language.
Ultra: Rootkit Detection over the Air
Tech’s Surprisingly Bad Math in Team Design
The article doesn't mention ROTC, and none of its few links that I opened mentioned ROTC either.

Your hand waving pessimism seems clearly unwarranted in this case. You think scholarships are just getting fired off with no one knowing who, where, or when?

At a decent guess for upper bound size, I see an estimate of 56% overall AD officers coming from ROTC. 2018 DoD demographics report puts total AD O-1 population at 28000, which should be a two year rank, so cut it in half for your new officers per year of 14000. Add 10% for people failing out, and you get about 8600 officers per year in ROTC, or a total of 34000 since it's a four year program.
>Missiles make ionospheric disturbances that GPS records. The yellow ripple is the ionospheric disturbance.

Where can I read more about the meta level concept of "isopheric disturbances"? (Because I suspect I'll find this has been done by military intelligence for a long time then rediscovered by so called "arms control" wonks who insist on putting their code into the public domain.)
since this is a university project, related to a comment on ryujinx emulator from a day ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33750368
Anti-lockdown protests spread in China as anger rises over zero-Covid strategy
A Practical Discrete 386
At this level of personal use on a pay-as-you-go plan Azure Functions seem to not even register a chargeable amount. You would pay something for the storage to hold your function code and data, but that might only cost $0.10/month for low usage.

You can run Python, TypeScript, JavaScript, C#, etc. Put it on a Timer Trigger, and you've got cronjobs in the cloud for almost no cost.
I dont think replacing cars with newer models is the solution. Even EVs are unsustainable to mass produce.

Given our world population, there is no sustainable future where people can privately own cars, period. The sooner we accept it and we start working on alternatives, the Better.
On the other hand, shouldn't we be stealing resources from bots, even if it costs us resources too?
I am unsure if fast turns is a thing of hierarchical organizations, especially the successful ones, what I see that the bigger (some say more successful) it is the slower it turns. Period. Also it's will to turn is lower by getting bigger, trying to stick to past success and methods as much as pussible because every change is constly and every change is risky, and the members don't want to risk the livelyhood of their family, rightfully. When have a choice then will rather not turn but go straight when it is big. I admit some big turn very quick, like Elon Musk with Twitter, but thats the other wrong end of the scale, finding the balance is not easy and most of the time unsuccessful except for a short period. And those could be attributed to luck in many many cases too. We remember the success stories not the failures (except the huge ones) and being sentimental with those being successful and gone. Big organizations' success come and go, rare to shine more than several decade and could die easily if the decisions are wrong (or forget to make decisions). How is their decision making is better then if they go away or fall? They grow quick, then comes an other due to the constant need for competition and the old one goes or falls back. The need for quick decisions and neckbraking pace is actually fuelled with quick decisions and neckbraking race of the organizations themselves and call it business setting if that was not their making but some kind of external condition. Also not always (or rarely) turn to a direction that is good for a society and not just for those very few being in the position of making the decision (mostly it is coincidental or side effect then). Also success of a hierarchical organization does not necessarily mean it is making any good for customers and people but just being big enough to force its views and interests on others. That's not really success and good then just a social form of violence.

Decisions are not easy when it affects lots of people and that's why those should be made as carefully as possible in the settings available and we know from social studies, it is proven, that individual decision making is quick, group decision making is accurate, in overall. For the group of people in the long run group decisions was better. As a side effect it was not making life unbearably quick by themselves and may eliminate the need for some of the quick decisions (some, as there are aspects outside of human groups that mandate actions, those cannot be eliminated).

Mostly philosophizing above.
Yes that is what I am arguing for… the right for sovereign nations to place tariffs. I mean, the US has tariffed Chinese goods as well now so it’s fair game. And if tariffs are so great why don’t countries do it all the time?

Despite tariffs iPhones still sell well and take a majority of profits in China, because it’s a superior product. Tariffs are just a form of subsidy and subsidies protect companies but make them less competitive. Apple wouldn’t exist if America was protectionist.
You are putting up a ridiculously high bar for expressing an opinion, where not even a research fellow in theoretical physics can pass.

If you were a research fellow in virology or immunology, and you had read and understood the relevant papers, then I would listen to you, yes. That doesn't mean I would take what you said as the final word.
GDB JIT Interface 101 (In LLDB/LLVM)
As often with Wikipedia articles, It is the academic view that dominates. It may historically accurate, but it is still misleading.

If you are not familiar with how music is produced today, I can tell you there is nothing "high art" about this anymore. Gazillions software and plugins are designed on those premises. And this not only for Algorithmic/AI uses, or even just in electronic music genres.
Then long term people should stop living places like that and assume they still can take a car to the middle of the city for every small thing.

That's kinda the point: disincentives, that will make people think twice about how they choose to live.
Startups that give out shares are rare. Startups tend to give options. Options take years to accumulate, and don't give any significant rights by themselves, such as voting or profit share. Employees can typically only afford to exercise options at key company financing events, because they have to sell many of the resulting shares to cover the cost of exercising and cost of tax.

Most startup employee recipients of options never get to exercise them for various reasons, often unable to due to cash flow or restrictive timing reasons, or because they aren't profitable (the employee would take a large financial loss). Many of those who do exercise the options get their shares after leaving the company or they're about to leave. And finally, of the small subset of employees who have shares as a result of exercising while still employed, the number of shares they have is a tiny percentage even in aggregate, so they have effectively no influence at shareholder meetings, if they choose to attend, and if their shares have voting rights which they don't always have.

In co-operatives, the majority of shares as well as voting rights are usually held by a high proportion of employees, so that's a completely different dynamic. As well as voting rights, it means any profit distributed as a dividend tends to go to employees as well.
Restructuring Pricing for the Downturn
Then demand Better public transportation. How do you think the Netherlands became the transportation paradise It is today?

Simple, large popular movements demanding it in the 70s. Before that their transportation was as car-centered as it is today in the US.
I think you're conflating different factors to create a false, but common, narrative that obfuscates the banality of the Nazis' rise to power.

The Weimar Republic was in essence Germany's first real experiment with democracy so many people in positions of power were still heavily invested in the old ways (whether directly as in the monarchists who wanted to reinstate the emperor, or less directly as in those who wanted to scale back democracy to establish a form of new aristocracy). At the same time you had communist movements trying to take democracy to its logical conclusion (but they were also split into competing factions because things like the Bolshevik revolution were happening around the same time) and a general populace exhausted from a long and failed war of attrition that had seen more death and suffering than any previous war on German territory.

The Nazis didn't get into power by winning the hearts and minds of the people, they got into power by allying with wealthy conservatives who were afraid of leftists and saw the Nazis as a natural antidote against communism. This allowed them free rein to suppress the opposition while also playing out the conservatives as too timid and ineffective because they had been unable to form a stable coalition government.

The death bed wish of Hindenburg was for Hitler to step down and restore the Hohenzollern monarchy. This was after Hitler had already become chancellor and was on his way to becoming the unchecked autocrat via the Enabling Act, which the conservatives co-signed. Hitler of course ignored this but it should tell you all you need to know about the delusions of the conservatives who enabled him.

Once the Nazis were in power, of course their support in the population grew because they claimed responsibility for everything good while creating a smokescreen of grandiose nonsense achievements, breaking ties and treaties with other countries as a show of force (which after the defeat of WW1 rekindled the national pride) and eventually "fighting back against Polish aggression" to start WW2. But at that point all political opposition had been silenced or murdered so of course people were more likely to support them. Questioning the government was not just frowned upon but became actively dangerous. And of course as the war progressed for many it became a sunk cost fallacy.

Reducing this to "actually the Nazis were popular" creates a false sense that there must have been something unique about 1930s Germans to have elected such an obvious evil as the NSDAP when in reality 1) the 1933 NSDAP still allowed for plausible deniability much like certain far-right parties do today, 2) the right (i.e. conservatives) saw the NSDAP as a stabilizing force because they saw the left as a threat to order and 3) even at their peak they couldn't get the majority of votes in a fair election.

People support institutions that do bad things if those bad things are sufficiently normalized. And a good dose of nationalist fervor or revanchism helps the medizine go down.
Despite #metoo, my sister was raped by her boss, and since she took more than a day to go to the hospital, not enough evidence of violence could be found. The police and her lawyer told her she had to wait until two more girls complain to the police.

I was a youth camp counselor, just don't be a creep with youglings and you're fine. Keep the doors open though.

I made a friend leave her abusive boyfriend by hosting her for four months. I would've done the same if she had a kid, but I'm happy there is social services to help women without support in the same situation.

And I disagree. I used to be fat (32 BMI), and had no that much trouble finding new dates, but it still wasn't easy. Now I'm still too heavy for what I want to do, but more built than fat, 'manly' if you will (sharper face at least, and defined arms muscles), and it's way, way easier. I don't have to seek outside my interest groups to find partners anymore. Manliness is still highly sought imho.
For the most time of year, there is uncomfortable weather/darkness that doesn't motivate to go out and meet others.
I am pretty weirded out by all the fellow software engineers I meet who just like, use git (the CLI program) directly.

It seems crazy to me, like just writing every loop in assembly language because, you know, it's a loop, might be performance-sensitive.

For day to day work, I use tools built on top of git, that present a much simpler workflow that is a tiny subset of what the CLI git program offers. Those tools include GitHub, Fork, SmartGit, our bug tracker's "New PR" feature, and e.g. my colleague's `pr-to-pr.sh` script, etc.

I include among those "tools" the few CLI commands for things I do so often, it's not extra cognitive waste — simple things like "git pull", "git push", and maybe "git checkout -b hoge-hoge-branch". So it's not literally true that I don't use the git CLI command, but it is effectively true.

To me, using git directly (aside from those few special cases) is like an "oh no, emergency!" type of action. Which does happen; I accidentally pushed commits to my local `main` branch or whatever, then I google it with kagi.com and like, carefully enter the right series of commands to rescue my work.

But that shit would happen like, all the time if I just used git CLI as my main interface to git.
Also, why isn't hardened ssh the default? Is this breaking too many things for the user?
In related recent news, Greta Thunburg and some other youngsters just filed a suit against Sweden:

https://mastodon.nu/@gretathunberg

https://www.dn.se/sverige/greta-thunberg-joins-over-600-othe...
Do you think server-side template is better than those React components based site builder? (I hate React with passion)
No more "every fortnight in future". Instead, it's "biweekly going forward".

I do miss the 'old' terms.
I've seen/heard it used to supplement existing compositions (a la NodeMusic. com) but not used unsupervised. As the site suggest, how will an AI know it's written good music?
No - it's an elastica, which cannot be represented exactly as a bezier. Raph Levien's work is a great read on this
https://www.levien.com/phd/thesis.pdf

and

https://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2008/EECS-2008-...
In a startup, employees usually don't really have much influence even if they have shares, because each successive funding round dilutes the existing shares.

Also, there's some significant differences in how shares work between cooperatives and corporations (at least in Germany, where I live). In a corporation, you get one vote per share, and shares can be freely traded once given out. In a cooperative, you only one vote per shareholder, no matter how many shares you hold, and shares cannot be traded. You can invest into the cooperative to get shares, and you can return your shares to get your capital back, but the cooperative gets final say in who gets to hold shares.
Maybe this is an interesting scientific development, but to pitch it as aiding deforestation is a massive stretch. Three quarters of deforestation is due to agriculture: https://ourworldindata.org/what-are-drivers-deforestation. So cultured meats would probably have a much bigger impact on deforestation than cultured trees.
Maybe it detects you using facebook container and infers you use firefox from that? Mine doesn't show anything firefox related, using ublock origin everywhere.
It's +32%
The ratio 'investors vs. builders' is off
Most people in modern society suffer under learned helplessness. Mostly because in childhood they had to go (or suffer) through schools without having much agency.

If you are constantly told that your own way is the wrong way of doing things then your are less inclined to do something on your own.
Promotion cycle, new unfinished languages.
"Too many meetings" is a problem many companies have. It's an efficiency problem. There are ways to reduce or even eliminate too many meetings.
Unlocking history - fascinating.

These two quotes in the article seem somehow incongruous:

"Simply putting it into a computer and telling the computer to work it out would literally have taken longer than the history of the universe!"

"Of course by today's standards it is pretty basic."
Not the person you replied to, but I've thought about this question myself and I think I've come up with a half decent analogy to explain it. (Someone more qualified can help me iron out any flaws).

Let's say there's an app to order pizza specifically from Dominoes. A generalisation of that idea would be an app to order a pizza from not just Dominoes, but from any food chain that offers pizzas.

An abstraction over that idea would be an app that offers some arbitrary thing in exchange for something that acts as a currency/payment(notice how we've entirely omitted money as a hard requirement).

So in essence, we went from:

An app that maps your money to a Dominoes pizza

Money -> Dominoes pizza at home

to an app that maps your money to any pizza from a food chain(generalisation)

Money -> (Pizza Hut, Dominoes, Papa Johns, ...) pizza at home

to an abstraction over the entire thing

Something to act as a "payment" -> Some return for said payment

An example I can think of for the last would be some service where people can exchange their skillset as a payment with each other. For example, if you know how to cook, you could cook something for a person, and in exchange they could offer a service using their skills to you(mabye help you clean a part of your house). So them cleaning a part of your house acts as a general payment, and you offering to cook for them is a service, it's sort of a abstract barter system over money.

edit: became french for a split second and spelt home as homme
CTE's and VIEW's can indeed express inference in relational databases. A "projects_with_vulnerable_log4j" view is a nice example, but possibly-recursive CTE's can achieve pretty much arbitrary inference, e.g. on graph-like data.
Wow! That looks pretty amazing. Makes we wish I used both a lisp and emacs... Does anyone know if there is anything similar that works for non-lispy languages (using syntax like do/end, {}, etc?) and in VSCode?
No. Let them bother someone else :P
Black Friday sales rake in a record $9.12B from online shoppers
I'm not sure if this is what you are looking for, but have you tired https://obsproject.com/ Warning: It has too many options, so it takes a while to get the correct configuration. Also, the difference between "Stopped" and "Recording" is too subtle, so I had to modify the layout style to make it foolproof for me.
Just a few. Enabling it on a few sites doesn't work as expected at all, and the add-on should probably be disabled on those - for example Twitter. First, it tries to enable the dark mode on Twitter, but the tweets itself are all gone (the only thing you see is the heading sections). And when you disable the extension to return to the normal mode, the dark mode remains on tweets (central section) for example, while the rest of it turns white again. That's a bug. I think you might need to crowdsource which websites it doesn't work fine with.
Nothing in life is risk free.

The phrase "land of the free, home of the brave" has to be read as "land of the free, because we are brave enough to take personal responsibility for our freedoms, rather than entrusting powerful authorities to safeguard them for us."
Risky investment then. Sad, plenty of other drug fueled films made it.
>I much prefer loneliness to enduring that kind of stuff.

That comment made me chuckle, no offense.

You're right, one big issue with loneliness is "what are the alternatives to it?" and sometimes they're even worse, even though you may not notice it at first.

Hanging out with people just to avoid being alone could lead you to engage in some vicious relationships who may end up being worse for you and your mental health.
Can confirm this is a good book -- I've been subscribed to the newsletter for a while
I understand that cutting funding may be unpalatable, but couldn't they instead incentivize passing the audit by offering bonuses to middle-managenent for departments that pass?
That's incorrect. That curve is Bernoulli's elastica, which is different from a parabola (though for small deformations they can be a reasonably close approximation).
> I don’t think there’s too much value to layering SSH over Wireguard.

Future in-the-wild vulnerabilities in the SSH protocol layer?
When equalizing during scuba, you're upright and can draw in a full lung of air before blowing your nose. So the air already tries to go "up" to your head, and with a fully expanded lung it's easy to "blow" the air out.

When freediving, however, this is more complicated. Your body is upside down, so the air floating up goes towards your stomach, not your ears where you want it. And since you only have the same air you started with at the surface, your lungs get compressed. So at 10m your lungs are only "half full". Then it becomes quite hard to actually blow any air out of them to equalize.

To avoid the mask squeeze, a freediver also have to let some air out of the nose to fill the mask. However, that air is much more valuable to a freediver. So often one use a mask with much less volume. Or even smaller goggles filled with water to avoid having to waste the air. Latter mostly for competitions, though. I personally freedive to see stuff underwater, heh.
It pretty much is. See https://devhumor.com/content/uploads/images/April2016/how-de....
Typical tradesman rates are 250-300/day. So if they can't pass it through, it's a 4-5% pay cut. If you can accept work outside London without that pay cut, why would you continue to work in London?

So it will likely end up being passed through, which means it has an inflationary impact of 4-5% on day rates (which are going up already due to broader inflation), which in turn squeezes customers (especially households) further. It's poor timing for such a policy when inflation is already squeezing households significantly.