skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Bingo. I am a full-time YouTuber. I hate this reality.

Most people don’t understand the degree to which advertiser preferences dictate what they see on YouTube.

Creators are incentivized to only publish content that meets YouTube’s “advertiser-friendly guidelines.” When we publish content that is not suitable for all advertisers, YouTube doesn’t promote it, which is a death sentence for the video. YouTube claims that a video’s monetization status has no impact on discovery, but according to YouTube, all of the factors that influence whether a video is monetized directly impact video discovery. It’s smoke and mirrors.

An overwhelming majority of views on YouTube come from recommendations and suggested videos, and YouTube has little incentive to suggest or recommend content that is ‘unsuitable’ for advertisers. Because it doesn’t make them money.

To put some numbers on that, ~95% of my views come from YouTube’s suggestions and recommendations. I have millions of subscribers, but subscriber count is all-but meaningless. For any given video, subscriber notifications typically account for a negligible number of views, usually less than 5,000.

Remember when YouTube introduced the bell you have to ‘ring’ in order to receive notifications from the channels you subscribe to? That is one of many actions YouTube has taken to remove your ability to choose what you see. YouTube does this because people don’t decide what to watch based on whether or not it’s advertiser-friendly. They would rather decide for you.

I publish news. And there are highly-newsworthy stories that I haven’t covered because of the above. I hate it.
"0 Available One-Word .com domain names"
What the person above said is true, it was even on dutch tv
> They've raised about a billion dollars of VC - https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/blockfi-inc/investor...

> talked to an employee that left last spring. She said they had literally no idea what they were doing. The founders are just ivy educated 30 year olds

So was SBF (MIT) and raised from Sequoia and Blackrok and his GF was a Stanford'ite with a Math degree and is responsible for the largest loss of funds from that cluster**.

Can we finally admit the biggest scammers in this space are those from Ivy League, and connections with SV insiders traditional VC/Banking/Finance without out a clue of what they are doing or how this tech actually works; as a fintech boot strapped founder with over a decade in the Bitcoin community its been fairly obvious for at least 7 years since Blythe Masters and all her cronies from traditional finance got involved this was the case.

Maybe now the rest of you vocal sideliners can finally see that is the case and that most of you are part of the problem more than most of us who have built startuprs using this tech without any of those things and did it the hard way outside of the VC/SV Ivy League World.
I personally look forward to the day where our technology is advanced enough that wild animals no longer have to live in constant fear of being ripped to shreds. IMO, no one, not even wild animals, should have to live in fear of that.

Also, by extension, predators shouldn’t have to face starvation, and prey should have their population controlled in a humane way.

These are problems that can’t be solved today, or likely any time soon. But I don’t buy the argument that “just because it happens in nature, it’s right”. I think Mother Nature provides effective solutions to these problems, but I also believe they aren’t the optimal solutions. We can and should do better.
In traditional bankruptcy proceedings, as you suspected, the little guys are at the extreme back of the line. I would follow the news closely and see if there is any mention of a firm representing individual investors.
Again, weirdly, not a single word on how Windows 95 copied the title bar design and buttons from NeXTSTEP.

See, for instance, here: https://guidebookgallery.org/screenshots/openstep42#full

The “close window” (“×”) button is identical, and Windows 95 re-purposed NeXTSTEP’s “minimize” button into a “maximize” button. But you can still see why NeXTSTEP’s “minimize” button looks that way; it resembles a NeXTSTEP application icon, seen at the bottom on the above screenshot.

Windows 95 did not, sadly, copy the very useful behavior of the “close window” button in NeXTSTEP: It changed shape if the contents of a window was not saved, as seen here: https://guidebookgallery.org/screenshots/openstep42#textedit...
Note that if you don't write with simd in mind you'll probably write code that cannot ever be autovectorized.

SIMD lexing/parsing could mean being less precise with error messages and so on.
IBM cloud does rent out mainframe cores, although it is quite expensive
These people also aren't that smart. Easily below average.

What did Zuck actually do? He stole an idea to compare women on campus. He then proceeded to add competition to his monopoly. When it comes to genuine innovation what is his crowning achievement? An empty billion-dollar VR chatroom that looks worse than Wii, that nobody (his employees included) wants to hang out in.

Elon built one of the shittiest companies around (PayPal), and then rode the curtails of his incredible employees on a bunch of other ventures, all while claiming to be smart (and we bought his bullshit). Now that his mental acuity is on the line, he is showing that a bag of rocks could do a better job.

I take moral issue with Steve Jobs, but he was the last big tech innovator. The current lot are just aimlessly flailing about.
https://github.com/NiceLabs/mops-vida-pm-watchdog

You can connect it via Bluetooth.
Eating grass, producing waste, requiring space, labor, and disposal of concentrated waste (too much cow dung goes beyond fertilization) is energy intensive, which is what the parent comment was bringing up.

Cost goes beyond the labor (which is what I am taking your comment to focus on)
The problem with growing whole animal for meat, suffering aside, is that it's extremely inefficient. Most of the energy an animal consumes is used to sustain its organism — which, for the purpose of food, is a waste.
for all times, the design should allow, over time randomness to be 1/3 pr side?
That’s not wrong. This thread began with a loose definition of “sterile” that you demonstrated understanding of above. The rest of us did OP the courtesy of not nitpicking it.
There is no reasonable people in the traditional finance space either if you look at the 2008 crash.

https://projects.propublica.org/bailout/list
Elon Musk: Apple Is Threatening Twitter&#x27;s Presence in the App Store
I'd suggest setting your expectations that you'll get none of it back.

There is a decent chance you'll get a small fraction back in several years, but it all depends on how many assets they have remaining. Keep an eye out for communications from the bankrupcy trustee once there is one - will probably go to the email you used to register your account.
If you are God and you make a universe that contains a people that you also created and they flip coins, where does the randomness come from?
thank you! there is a literal multi-year delay in 1.1 which has so many nice things in it.. i will try to get it out.

edit: would also like to note that I have been thinking about this problem for like 10+ years lol.
Producers go through not insignificant effort to reduce and eliminate the stress of slaughter on meat animals. Suffering results in stress which results in poor quality meat (tasteless and tough), and millions of dollars worth of meat is tossed out annually due to pre-slaughter stress.
No, it should be perfectly clear by now that none of them are safe, no matter what they say. The best time to get your coins out of any exchanges was when the FTX fall began. The second best time is right now.
That 5% is pretty big arguably.
Another "crypto" company that was not actually crypto. These guys just held people's money custodially and promised some dumb overblown interest rate. Sure their theme was "crypto" and they have the bitcoin logo on their website, but the underlying mechanism of trusting someone who has a slick app with your money is the opposite of crypto.

It seems like silicon valley VCs completely missed the boat on crypto by dumping money on any huckster with a Stanford degree. Instead of asking "is this the end of crypto", maybe we should ask "is this the end of silicon valley".
> GitHub Issues, the product/feature, is clearly defined and encompasses things that deserve discussion, debate, or dispute.

Except that GitHub Issues originally only encompassed bugs. Labels weren't added until later that allowed you to filter by "type". Also, GitHub Discussions are for discussions, not GitHub Issues. GitHub themselves say that Issues is "often referred to as GitHub's bug-tracking system", so I wouldn't say that it's so "clearly defined".

https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/quickstart/communicat...
Exactly. This helps train the "don't believe everything you read" muscle.
Now that you mention it, once in Santa Fe (NM) I had a great dinner in a Tex-Mex... I felt the conversation went wild due to some substance --- I suspected thc --- but this really rings only a partial bell... why I never felt it so strong in Asia, where I consumed more capsaicin?
Different initial conditions. Presumably the initial velocity and angular momentum are randomized.
We need to reach the same high level of developer experience with Open Source as what cloud providers provide today. It is infinitely easier to prototype and move fast using the building blocks provided by the cloud, and hard to let these go when things move into production.

Things will be different if proprietary becomes objectively more painful from the get-go, and/or when Open Source becomes easier to adopt. We can only work on the latter, though.
Is it program with UB?

If yes, then compiler can compile program doing literally anything* and be in compliance with standards as defined.

*including hacking Pentagon to order drone strike on location where it was compiled.

Or summoning demons.

Or deleting your file system through a system call.
I'm a little worried about nutrition. I'm sure lab grown meat has plenty of protein but what about all the other micro-nutrients?

I'm talking about the spectrum of compounds that inevitably find their way into the muscle tissue from real animals digesting real food.
Did Lehman commit fraud?

My understanding is no.
I suspect the pitch would be that in a possible future with sufficient scale, and improvements to process and efficiency, that you would be able to replace the category 1 meat entirely with lab grown meat, allowing folks to maintain their meat consumption at low cost without the horrors of massive scale meat production.

I've got no idea if that's plausible or not.

Either way I'd vastly prefer that we regulate (and stop subsidizing) animal farming to the point that all meat basically falls into category 2.
Efficiency of wind turbines increases with height above 'ground'. I expect for this purpose the top of the tree canopy would be the ground, so turbines would have to be higher by the amount of the forest canopy height, at least. I expect there are more issues with wind flow over tree canopy vs a crop field, but I suspect the height issue alone is enough to make the economics pretty bad.
GCC can do it for you with autovectorization.

Doing the feature detection is fairly trivial. If they don't run the invalid instructions don't error.
Excellent article, but don't make having close friends part of your main goal. Once you are comfortable with who you are, do things on your own, work on new hobbies and interests, then you will attract the right people. Being confident and positive are a people magnet.
It could still be worth saying "no", per the article, to the 295 open feature requests. The fact that the maintainers have not (yet) declined these requests, resulting in this seemingly inflated total of 300 "Issues", is not necessarily a problem with github.
How far off is bpy (Blender's Python API) do you think?
My State shows up as Yellow... There is only 1 city that most of us in the state believe actually should be a part of the neighboring blue state that requires testing for 99% of people in my state no testing is required, I have a feeling many of the red states on that map are the same.
>Where will that leave people trying for either ML engineer or more data analysis focused DS roles? Or even just everyday utility scripting/automating powers? Can even the latter two can be largely replaced by hybrid finetuned multi modal language/code models. I feel a bit lost and like I have wasted my time.

IME most people have a bit of culture shock when they first get an ML/DS role. When you learn ML/DS, there's a huge focus on the coding and mathematical parts of the job, and not on much else. When you get a job, suddenly you're exposed to everything else and you realize why every data scientist says that ML is only a tiny part of their job.

There's a lot of variety in DS jobs, but one of the things I try to explain (when somebody asks me) is that the real skill of every DS job I've had is "Taking a vaguely defined business problem and working with stakeholders to come up with a solution that happens to use code, math, and charts as the path to that solution." In reality, to succeed in as a Data Scientist, you have act like a Product Manager+Product Owner+Data Analyst+Software Engineer+Data Engineer+Data SME.

This is why so many attempts at "We can make your Business People Data Scientists" products haven't taken over. You might be able to take over some of the boring parts (e.g. AutoML, doing the parts that Data Scientists hated doing anyway), but I've never seen a piece of software that could tell the business users that they don't have the right data to measure what they are trying to measure.

I've even seen commercial AutoML solutions lead to business people realizing they need to hire Data Scientists. This is because once you use AutoML, you realize you need somebody who actually understands the data and the process to really trust the results.

If "hybrid finetuned multi modal language/code models" can replace what competent people in ML/DS can do, that technology is going to replace a lot more professions than just ML/DS. There's going to be a job apocalypse for lots of professions, including SWEs.

I think from a career standpoint, ML/DS is a bit of a mess because it's a new field and businesses are still trying to figure out the best way to get value out of it. So there are a lot of pain points for people working in the field. Compare that with Software Engineer, which is older and a bit more mature. But I still think ML/DS is a field worth getting into if you can sort through the noise of which jobs are good and which are crap.
Huh? It looks like it was saying the three are Celsius, Voyager, and BlockFi, but it’s missing a much larger one, Genesis. Although that maybe be going bankrupt to if it can’t get support from its parent company DCG.
I've got a friend pushing 80 who says his trick is to get up, get a book (not a phone or tablet), and just try to do a little reading. Puts him right back to sleep.

Yes, as we age many of us do find ourselves not sleeping well. That said, I'd look hard at your pre-sleep rituals. Sugar (in the form of alcohol or dessert) can be a factor. Similarly, eating too close to bedtime gives your body excess energy to burn off and can keep you awake. Sleep apnea is obviously a problem that awakens some people, but for others it can be allergies / excess particles in the air that cause you to cough or not breath easily and wake you up - worth considering allergy issues, air quality, etc in regard to sleep.
Can I ask why? If you wanted to put money into crypto, why didn't you use a blockchain where you could verify your holdings and nobody could take them from you? BlockFi was just an incredibly shitty bank.
Making relatively common settings unable to be changed by administrators. For example, users cannot change the time zone in Brivo. Neither can administrators.

Not having a central place where the administrator can verify what the system thinks is the system time.

Reducing feature set when rolling out new backend that I didn't ask for.
I wish I know how, as a migrant that changes countries every 5-7 years... Alas, there is no way.
I worked for AseraCare for five years and another hospice for three. Although it was a large company, most of the branches were small and (I assume) unprofitable. Hospice is a very tough business until economies of scale take hold above 100 or 200 concurrent patients.

I never saw any fraud and have tremendous respect for the clinicians. It was a bad work environment though because of unrealistic expectations put on the executive directors to grow grow grow. In five years I worked for five executive directors locally, and five CEOs at the national level.
Im tired of the media asking variations of the question:
"why this thing that is supposed to be good, ruined by profit seeking?"

The answer starts with "c" and ends with "apitalism". Any other answer is bullshit.
Let's be clear who really destroyed the value - it's the people who took money from pension funds saying they'd invest in cutting edge technology and instead put it into computer meme money startups
The thing is BM (and others) aren't trying to create vega/vegetarian meat. They are trying to make meat in a sustainable way, so it has to taste more like beef/pork than chickpeas or tofu if they want to get the main market.

They are still not there.
I regret to inform you that it was not isolated to "crypto funds". A lot of VCs mish-mashed them together with their other investments and slapped a Cathy Wood style name on it like "future innovation fund". VCs are mostly just salespeople, and so are founders. VCs sell to organizations such as pension funds, and founders sell to VCs. Most VCs lose money, especially in an environment full of froth, and most VCs don't know what they are really doing. From what I have observed, a lot of laypeople have a ton of respect when they hear the word "VC".
It is those kind of people who ignored "Web3.0" in the name of "Web3". Kimmel was famous for having a cringeworthy interview with Hilton about NFTs.

For me the "semantic web" was like one of those asian "gods of poverty" that show up in places like Touhou. After more than 10 years of being involved with it I finally met somebody who knows who to do interesting things with OWL and I think she thinks I'm the first person she met that cares.
Probably not, but I'm not morally against it or anything. I just don't see why I would eat it.
In-game purchases harm children, says new report
Interest rates were on the rise in 2019. Venture-backed enterprises are very sensitive to the cost of money.
It's too bad you're getting downvoted. This is an obvious and appropriate Simpsons' quote
Why not? Twitter is now Elon’s private property, existing only to serve his personal interests. There is no reason for it to be given special treatment.
Plunged into the 1990s!!! The abject crawling squalor of listening to
Prince songs and going to Blockbuster to rent a movie.
A Tour of 4 MSVC Back End Improvements
Quantum effects, of course!
NFTs are collectors items. It's as stupid as collecting anything, including fine art, photography, baseball cards, rocks. I'll admit it seems more strange because it's uninteresting, but claiming collecting is idiotic is pretty short-sighted.

No, I don't collect that crap :)
Firing up a GPU just to do a little bit of inference sounds quite expensive.

CPUs (let alone CPUs talking to a GPU) spend huge numbers of cycles shunting data around already.
I've played similar looking games (Zombies!!) and while it wasn't terribly ergonomic it was definitely playable. It's important to use a good grid, and to lock things like tiles in places if you're going to be putting stuff on top of it.

I doubt the UI has improved very much honestly. Maybe the pieces you were dealing with were just too small, or you were zoomed out too far? While things can occasionally be a bit finicky to grab we've honestly never had those kinds of major problems with it, although we mostly stick to simpler games like catan and dungeons-and-dragons.
You can, using stablecoins like USDC. These also involve counterparty risk, but they are extremely simple to audit and regulate.
The concept of "ghosting" someone might actually be a more widely used phrase at this point, though.
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/introduce

to create... as if for the first time;
I would build on this and have a frank discussion with your partner about risk tolerance and long term goals around your portfolio. A single exchange failure should not expose you to this much risk.
I've seen the same in many other humanitarian responses. The UN also has Toyota Corollas (or similar sedans) in their fleets and they're often used for short distances. The problem (or the advantage depending on the security situation) is Corollas don't stand out as much as Land Cruisers. In some countries, white Toyota Corollas are the most common car.
That's your n=1 opinion and it doesn't change the reality of human preferences which are clearly documented in the literature. Even the overall health outcomes associated with grass-fed are not significantly different than grain-fed. The tissue composition may be different, but not health-outcomes.
> Down here in Brazil you basically give the animals it's vaccines and let them graze for a few years

Let me fix this for you:

> Down here in Brazil you basically destroy a million square kilometers of old growth rainforest, give the animals it's vaccines, and let them graze for a few years
Aye, but it will be nice when mining Luna to have locally sourced meat instead of just yeast concentrate.
> Much better to do on the GPU

Oh? Which GPU? iGPU? Discrete? Intel? Nvidia? AMD? From which generation? Using what libraries? Assuming you are running on an x86-64? Or maybe arm? Something else? How are you going to handle underflow/overflow? Did you need IEEE FP support? How many $1000s were you going to spend on hardware to test/verify your code on different GPUs?

Also depends on how big the matricies are, if they are too small and the latency of the GPU isn't worth it, too large and it won't fit. The too small/too large decision depends on which GPU, how many PCIe lanes, and which library.

So not such a simple decision.
Particle density, TVOC, CO₂, temperature, humidity. With the first two being most important, the rest being extra.

My experience so far involved playing with sensors for all of these, except CO₂, that are popular with hobby electronics crowd. Back then I didn't really care about measurement accuracy, I was just goofing around. Since then, I've read all these sensors require significant work to get them to produce stable and reasonably accurate readings.

As for CO₂, I've only read about the options recently, but apparently the actual sensor is pricey-ish, so even in mass market products, the CO₂ measurement is inferred from TVOC, temp, Rh, and a magic lookup table supplied by the vendor (and accurate only in their test lab). This is the main example of what I meant by not reporting what it says on the tin.

Now, I'm not necessarily after high-quality absolute measurement values, as long as the relative change is detected correctly. But I don't know the space well enough to go around Aliexpress shopping for components myself, and every company that seems to have done some work to validate results and calibrate their devices also wants to shove their app down my throat, which is a no-go.
Maybe you could be his friend and help pick a better typeface that works for prose ^^
I like to use C gamedev libraries from Haskell