skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I was ready to purchase a Rav4 this year but went with Ford instead precisely because of this. I have no reason to believe Ford won't _eventually_ follow suit but at least, for now, I don't have to pay to use the remote start.
I was going to mention that as a possibility, a lot of these people are likely to be unemployed soon. There was a lot of "We should stay connected, I'd love to exchange Twitter follows/email" type of thing.
Issue with os threads is that their number is limited. Not the issue with communication.
Futures are good enough for that, if you need more then structured concurrency.
> Doesn't that saturate Tor?
No, that's a stupid myth that needs to die. The tor network is nowhere near the advertised bandwidth capacity: https://metrics.torproject.org/bandwidth-flags.html
I think they're referring to the end result mimicing user input. Right now most cars are "drive by wire" where your pedal input is just one of many factors in the computer's "input by committee" before the final acceleration is sent to the motor controller.
Googled "Marey chart" and "Marey diagram" and your site showed up on the front page. That's impressive as it looks like you only published a day ago!
It’s a subject that gets quite hot quite fast, but as tactfully as possible: Looking in from the outside, the restrictions on gun sales in the US are pretty tame compared to a lot of other countries.
Totally. A computer is worth tens of thousands of board feet of wood. Until I could afford a house and woodworking tools, this (and music) were my two primary creative outlets.
Ask HN: Is there alternative to Click to Tweet?
I like this service (https://clicktotweet.com) but I have feeling that is not being updated. It looks kind a obsolete. Is there some other service that would allow you to create a Tweet by simply clicking on the link?
Structured concurrency.
People have been believing that for close to a decade now.
I feel that if you make a claim like this, you should link to the full text of your exchange.
100% it's this.

I've been in the room when making this exact kind of product proposal (not MB). The pushback from drivetrain and electrical on warranty, repair, battery life etc was intense and directly related to future satisfaction. Sure, you can push the envelope on the spec, but it does tend to come at a cost.

Say they give this option for free... And it reduces the battery life/capacity by 10% over the course of a year. Pretty sure people would be clutching their handbags in horror.

You buy a car with a spec. Aftermarket mods are definately a thing to increase that spec, and they've been around for a while, both for ev and ice. They've always been available at a cost. This time it's from the MFG and we all lose our minds.
The main innovation of tree-sitter, even more than incremental parsing, as I see it is that it provides a uniform api for traversing a parse tree, which makes it relatively straightforward to onboard a new language to a tool with tree-sitter support. The problem though is that the tree-sitter grammar is nearly always going to be an approximation to the actual language grammar, unless the language compiler/interpreter uses tree-sitter for parsing. To me, this is problematic for tooling because it is always possible for a tree-sitter based tool to be flat out wrong relative to the actual language. For syntax highlighting, this is generally not a huge deal (and tree-sitter does generally work well, though there are exceptions), but I'd be more cautious with security tools based on tree-sitter.

If all languages changed their reference parsers to tree-sitter, this would be moot, but that seems unlikely. Language parsers are often optimized beyond what is possible in a general purpose parser generator like tree-sitter and/or have ambiguities that cannot be resolved with the tree-sitter dsl.

What feels perhaps likely in the future is that a standard parse tree api emerges, analogous to lsp, and then language parsers could emit trees traversable by this api. Maybe it's just the tree-sitter c api with an alternate front end? Hard to say, but I suspect either something better than (but likely at least partially inspired by) tree-sitter will emerge or we will get stuck in a local minimum with tooling based on slightly incorrect language parsers.
But apparently it’s our “civic duty” to read, spread, and talk about the endless garbage they promote.
On the other hand, if everything is always presented in its full complexity with a million caveats and you lose people because they don't have the prerequisite knowledge to be able to digest it, I guarantee this will result in many, many more potential contributions being lost than from those who were just "satisfied that it was all worked out already".
Have you looked into using an ingress controller[1]? Still not quite as easy as a managed LoadBalancer but at least you wouldn't have to configure every single service manually.

edit: of course, not very useful if your services aren't using HTTP.

https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/services-networking/ingr...
> They even disable the Xbox game overlay. I guess they just assume none of your games will be from the Microsoft store.

They have a flag to effectively disable the store and UWP apps[1] so yeah, that's a safe guess.

[1]: https://github.com/Atlas-OS/Atlas/blob/a356ba84b52131d2130a6...
Yup, and it keeps steadily winning a small stream of converts and additional projects from C.

So I didn't believe it before, but it's starting to seem more plausible.

Of course, it'll take a very long time. There's a lot of C code out there. :D
You can use an adapter:

https://www.apple.com/shop/product/MD821AM/A/lightning-to-us...
I know that K8s isn't Docker, but discussing learning the former, does anyone have a suggestion for learning the latter? I know what Docker is and have even used it for a production service, but I definitely don't feel like I've learned it "properly". I vaguely recall reading some of the Docker documentation and was underwhelmed with its ability to onboard newbies.
Why not artillery? Hand grenades/explosives? Rocket propelled grenades? Air incendiary bombs? Fully automatic machine guns? Nuclear weapons? Lasers?

I think one of the things this naive/dumb snippet (if taken at face value) is that the American obsession with the personal firearm is an arbitrary categorization in its own right, as arbitrary a line in the sand that bow/arrow would be.

Your instinctual desire for "no, I want a firearm" is just a reflection of cultural values, not any practical need. If you want firepower, use any of dozens of approaches that are more potent, some easier and requiring less industrial base than a rifle/handgun. For example, a sling/catapult that flings a bomb/makeshift grenade, you just need gunpowder and rocks for that.

I didn't even get into chemical weapons. Or biological weapons.

But yeah whatever, your .22 cal fits in the "strict constructionalist" interpretation of the second amendment. The fact the court interpretation of the second amendment aligns with the gun industry's sweet spot of profitable convenient consumer products is just a magic, mysterious coincidence.
The article is about usernames as email addresses.

Not about handles.

HN doesn't reveal people's e-mail addresses, unless they choose to put it in their bio.
I enjoy when the nice abstract models we work with are given a course-correction, and we are reminded of the profound, gargantuan complexity of the real world.

Sometimes, we get lost in our models and start thinking that they are reality, rather than just poor approximations of the real mess that's out there.

So, nice article (:

For a shorter version, that also gives some of that sense of the real complexity of cells, I like "Cells are very fast and crowded places"[1].

One good quote:

molecules move unimaginably quickly due to thermal motion. A small
molecule such as glucose is cruising around a cell at about 250 miles per
hour, while a large protein molecule is moving at 20 miles per hour. Note
that these are actual speeds inside the cell, not scaled-up speeds. I'm
not talking about driving through a crowded Times Square at 20 miles per
hour; to scale this would be more like driving through Times Square at
20 million miles per hour!

[1] http://www.righto.com/2011/07/cells-are-very-fast-and-crowde...
> Fewer skus is better for efficiency, labor shortage issues, and the environment

Sure, but if it's cheaper to only make the better model, then they should just only sell it as such, rather than making something you own withhold features from you.

> We don’t get upset when adobe or Apple hides software features behind pay walls

Yes we do. Don't you remember the Pantone Photoshop story from less than a month ago?
"AI Professor DESTROYS haters with this weird old trick"
I’ve also observed these waves, but never about a language that you can’t actually go pick up a compiler or interpreter for. Jai is unique in that sense.

Who’s actually getting into these closed betas?
The gods are vengeful.

The priests say virgin sacrifices pacify the gods.

Therefore we must sacrifice a virgin on every new moon. While we are at it, we should also build a palatial mansion for the wise priests.

Yup, checks out.
It makes sense that the average person would feel less alert without breakfast since they’re not used to low-carb.
100%, these are TODOs! But to be transparent, there's been a lott of TODOs opened from this launch. It's likely going to be a few releases away before we get to this one.
In practice pwm is used instead of DC.
Solar-cell efficiency versus cost to produce is a big challenge. Mostly because the power generated is an average based on unpredictable weather days. So you need higher efficiency and lower cost to offset that and make it worth the price for consumers.
Except a blackbox that simply spits out a resultant folded protein doesn't actually improve our understanding of anything. Are we just going to fuzz the blackbox with different protein combos hoping to find something useful? In that case, aren't we just more likely to find some stupid error in the ML predictor?
And now there’s Rust in the Linux kernel
The books I am reading are around here someplace...though I am getting better at putting them back in a bookshelf when I am not reading them.

Or they're in Books (usually locally stored) on my iPhone.

There are no books, I am planning to read except when a copy is still a shipment. Basically, when I hear about a book, I look into acquiring it. If it is infeasible to acquire, I let it go, because I already have shelves (physical and virtual) of books I am reading -- a not-trivial fraction of I might not ever finish both because I don't get around to it and because really good books are reread.

My operating theory is that there are many many more books I would like to read than I will ever spend time reading. So I go with the moment rather than creating wishlists. YMMV. Good luck.
I think the framing of your argument is a little bit misguided. Looking at history and possibilities doesn't really get you anywhere. Sometimes people get a tech massively wrong, sometimes they don't.

In order to have an actually good discussion, we need to look at the thing and go past the "well someone criticized the Internet too and now look at it".

So taking the idea of the blockchain. What makes the blockchain a "different thing"? The differential aspect is that it allows untrusted nodes to join in a distributed architecture. It's not the only database that exists and it's not the only distributed one either. So any claims of new features brought by blockchain should justify why they need the "untrusted distributed nodes" part. If they don't, we can assume that those new features don't really need the blockchain: either it's already been done, it's not an use case people are too interested in or it's not viable due to other reasons (economical, technical apart from storage, political...). In the case of blockchain claims, most don't actually justify the need for the untrusted distribution. For example, smart contracts: it's just a fancy word for "computer program" only that it runs on a distributed trustless architecture. But is that really needed? My bank already runs computer programs that execute loan payments, for an example of things people try to implement with smart contracts.

Compare that with personal computers or even AI. PCs allowed data manipulation, storage and calculations at a capacity that was not previously available. Of course the first computers wouldn't have enough power to do things that a wide array of people would find useful, but "low power" isn't a fundamental aspect of personal computers in the same way that "low bandwidth" isn't a fundamental aspect of blockchains.
Scaling up manufacturing faster. The skills required to install solar (installing ground mount racking, installing panels, wiring panels to inverters, wiring inverters to utility service entrance) can be taught in under a year, the bottleneck is how fast panels come off the fab.
It’s part of the plan to describe the class divide with the auto market - the rich get new cars and can afford the paywalls, the working class gets used 20+ year old models.
>Diagnosis is classification.

A radiologist's diagnosis is not image classification, it's reality classification maybe. (That's quite poetic).

Watching an educational Youtube video about endangered tiger habitats is not the same thing as segmenting possible embedded pictures of kitties and poachers or whatever, and classifying them as such. There's, like, a lot of additional context.
It's easy to say "buy a box and connect it to the internet", but that's consumer grade equipment. If my computer goes down, it only affects me. When an instance goes down, it can affect thousands of people.

I'm not saying they couldn't find a less expensive solution with AWS or Azure, but they need a solution now. They don't have the time to learn a new solution, design the system, and then implement a new backend while people are swarming to their instance. Migrating to another solution (even the above "box") means significant downtime for 50,000 people.
Hey now, a couple of us remember! ;)

Yahoo is how baby me learned the word 'hierarchical'.
If the site doesn't need email for anything besides that, then it doesn't need email for that either. Let the user set an email for account recovery if they want, but don't require it. If users who choose not to give an email forget their password, they can simply create another account.

This is the way HN works. It's the way most websites used to work, until maybe 15 years ago, give or take. Today almost all sites ask for verified email addresses, but this used to not be the case.

Besides the commercial value of having user email addresses, I think it's mostly done for the webdev's ego:

> Users need to hear about my new update! (Because if I don't spam their inbox, nobody will notice or care about the thing I just did.)
Funny that I have another anecdote, also for the DMV.

I owned a vehicle for 15 years and it broke down on me, as a result I dropped insurance on it as I wasn't sure if I wanted to keep it or not.

fast forward 3 months and it turned out to be a relatively cheap repair so I went to get it tagged (it had expired while uninsured) and the woman at the DMV absolutely hammered me on the paperwork I had to show her to the point that even the agent at the insurance company was confused about what she wanted.

I go to another location and lo-and-behold it's no longer a problem. Maybe she was in a bad mood, maybe she didn't like the way I looked. I have no idea, but the point you're making is absolutely relevant in day to day life.

And if I can pontificate slightly further, inequities exist in life, there is no way to completely remove them. Giving autonomy to low level people and squashing the ones that abuse that autonomy is absolutely better for people overall, even if it isn't perfect.
> This feels like "alertness associated with other positive health traits."

Going to bed later was also associated with alertness.
Is the ActivityPub spec just as bad, or would it be performant if written in a proper language?
But we gave the keys to the economy to some vain children who have never had to do real work to make a name for themselves. Straight from uni being librarians assistants to the elders, straight to running the world!

Society is still led by vague mental imagery and promises of forever human prosperity. The engineering is right but no one asks if rockets to Mars are the right output to preserve consciousness. We literally just picked it up because the elders started there and later came to control where the capital goes.

We’re shorting so many other viable experiments to empower same old retailers and rockets to nowhere.
Nobody uses a potentiometer as a throttle pedal because they may fail in any position. 2 or 3 potentiometers are used, and only upon agreement of the signals do they propel the vehicle. That's why the pedal has digital electronics in it, and you don't have some dumb potentiometers wired straight to an ADC input on the ECU.
Awesome game. I agree that left click to rotate left and right click to rotate right would be so much more convenient.
This sounds exactly like the sound of the big city (minus some distracting noises on top). I always loved being in a city. Mystery solved :)
Did people actually named their dogs like that or is that wild imagination of some writer? A lot of them seem... impractical
Judging by these comments, everyone is writing web apps in Rust these days. While I can understand the fascination that many HNers seem to have with Rust (been wanting to give it a try myself for some time now, but work and life always get in the way), I'm still not sure web apps are really a good fit for a language that has a reputation for being high performance, but more difficult than other languages commonly used for web development. I mean, you wouldn't build a web app in C/C++, and not only because of the potential security issues?
This is staggering to me for a different reason. Having a single tree cut down (and removed, which I guess they didn’t do) in our neighborhood costs in the vicinity of $4000-$10,000.
It takes a Village: The evolution of the D community (DConf '22)
This talk by Mike Parker summarizes the history of the D programming language community.

It may be of interest to anyone who finds programming languages or small communities interesting.
Seems like intentionally processing and reframing, regardless of the medium used to write, would be the way to go.
This is a non-dismissal login prompt. I doubt the benefit of user logging in and signing up is high.

It is a straight up bad UX and not user first, and the owning team defends it because they don't rely on common sense.

Of course, if you put login prompt anywhere, you would get at least some logins or signups (at least 1).

Twitter had this issue before where they didn't allow non-logged in users to browse twitter home at all by showing a non-dismissable login prompt. It took Jack Dorsey to come back and change that in 2016.

But yeah sure the non-dimissable login prompt on the search page is great. Hahaha

This is how bad product management at twitter is
Is The Hill making up those quotes?
The other reason I have heard is that since it's slower to write by hand you are forced to summarize it, which means you need to understand. You can't mindlessly type anymore.
That is mostly a myth. The ICE doesn't have regular oil changes, but you still need to rotate the tires at the same intervals. There are a few oil leaks and such that you miss out on, but the shocks will still wear out over time (maybe sooner as EVs tend to be heavier). Odds are the body of the car will wear out before the engine/transmission will need major work.

Even ignoring that, by the time the engine needs expensive maintenance it is old and likely to go to an independent mechanic.

While there is warranty issues, there will be such with electric motors and their controllers as well.
The tide is shifting. Anti US/globalist sentiments and conservatives are quickly emerging as one group.
Saying that saying something is a slippery slope is a fallacy is itself a fallacy
> for reasons that I don't really understand.

I believe it's just the amount of time it takes to physically write a sentence with pen and paper, compared to spoken word or even typing which can be pretty fast in comparison. Your brain is mulling the words over several times over as you write it. That leaves more of an imprint as you are literally thinking about it more as your hand slowly writes each word out. I can type pretty fast, but I don't remember what I type nearly as well as what I physically write out. I just think it's the speed difference and how much time you toil with the specific thought.
This is really cool!

I just think that the definition of “machine” is too restrictive. To me a machine is a very broad word and no matter how complex we find our bodies to be, it’s still ok to think of them as machines. That doesn’t mean it’s ok to oversimplify how they work or to presume we know everything about them.
But the odd time when system 2 is also satisfied, you genuinely learn something important and new. How lovely that feeling is.
Just don't think they have improved in any meaningful way since launch and in fact some of the experiences have gotten worse.

At launch I could reliably "Hey Siri" a timer across the room, now it just doesn't work because presumably Apple have downgraded the long range microphone tech at some point to save costs.

Eventually just stopped bothering and just set them manually.
Or they could enable all features and you'd receive an itemized monthly bill for all the times or minutes you used a given feature. "Accelerator pressed to the floor 18 times, $xxx. Radio playing for 3h45m, $xxx"
> living standards in the poorest countries in the world will eventually catch up to the United States

What part of the US? Because we're paying most of our income for a tiny two bedroom apartment and barely have enough money to afford groceries because the government took our SNAP EBT. We're paying almost $200/mo for 25Mbps internet and don't have any other options because the ISP here is a monopoly.

Sure we're lucky to have medical insurance, but it only covers everything except dentistry which is ironically what we've needed the most recently. Oh, and medical insurance is a thing you need here.

Grass is always greener.