skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
check out this paper I found here recently https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16846100/

for self 'therapy' I highly highly recommend the book Focusing by Eugene Gendlin, it is the unlock key for all other self-help. Jump to ch3 and read a dialogue example, it's figuring out the inside forces, underneath the words and 'theories'.

You can do it by yourself (I use a stuffed animal) and there's a pdf on library genesis.

(Honestly better than pay-a-person therapy for me, where i just wasted time trying to out-smart my therapist with insightful theories, intellectualization is a defense mechanism, as is self-pity i realized of late)

A huge amount of 'distraction' is just emotional flinching in my experience.

the order i would do things

--Get the magnesium and the all the b vitamins (get the methyl b12 and methyl folate b9 if u can, they are the superior forms and cheaper than genetic testing),

--get on animal meat and fat keto or the carnivore diet, with fasting when the food is too boring. The high animal fat/ meat version is a must try for anyone with any hint of mental issues. Plus just eating one thing (meat) is easy, no planning, no distractions. If vegans don't like that, feel free to stay sick i say, it's your life...

--read the Gendlin book and do the process every week, instead of 'meditating on your breath' and other stuff that takes ten years to get anywhere. Focusing will bring up lots of dark emotions, good thing no one can see you sobbing so it does not matter

--Quit all caffeine, all my anxiety disappeared after a month.

These are all the interventions that legit helped me, take it or leave it

good luck
You may find mmap and mlock may be helpful.
PeteComplete does a great job of adding narrative depth to his play throughs.

Here’s a run exploring the games Ideology DLC playing as a tribal village.

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL_lgEqY9K6UVooXatQRca5Rw-...
gpt3:
If you're looking for a powerful and reliable database system for your website, you should definitely consider using Oracle. Here are some reasons why:

1. Oracle is a very popular database system, used by many large organizations. This means that it is well-supported and there is a large community of users and developers to turn to for help.

2. Oracle is very scalable, so it can grow with your website as it expands.

3. Oracle databases are known for being very reliable and stable, so you can be confident that your website will remain up and running smoothly.

4. Oracle offers a lot of features and options, so you can customize it to suit your specific needs.

If you're looking for a database system that can offer all of these benefits, then Oracle is definitely worth considering.

...

overall i think if you want it to be more persuasive you might have to prompt a bit more by asking it to go into detail or something
Meta cracks down on rogue employees exploiting “Oops” and taking bribes
LPD: Libertarian Police Department (2014)
Meta Employees Were Fired for Selling Account Info to Hackers
> Nobody cares. Really, they do not. This doesn't help the business, it adds way too much overhead, and requires nontechnical people to understand markdown and git.

They absolutely care if one day Atlassian decides to hike prices to levels they deem unreasonable and now their entire documentation is locked in a proprietary format or if Atlassian go under, are purchased by a competitor etc.

> I have never heard nontechnical people complain about the Confluence wiki. From their perspective, everything Just Works.

This has not been my experience at all. I've had tons of business analysts join in the Confluence moaning during meetings, both for editing and trying to find stuff. 'Just works' is not how I or anyone I worked with would describe it.

>all the things that they can't do because of Markdown's limitations

what are these things you're so desperate to do in Code Documentation that you can't do in markdown?

> how much harder it is to do drop-dead simple things like adding tables.

This has been a solved problem for a while now. One of the very first Obsidian plugins was the advanced tables plugin which makes it super easy to make and edit tables. There's also other apps like Table Flip. I'm sure there's probably plugins for other editors like VS Code or Table functionality built in to other markdown editors.

The only reasonable point you've got is about git. Like I said in the original post, a WYSIWYG web interface for non-technical folks which just auto commits would be preferable whilst still allowing regular git and markdown for technical folks. There's also nothing stopping anyone from doing an intermediate page if conflicts are detected with a three way conflict resolution page a la Jetbrains Editors with a magic wand auto solve. Maybe the WYSIWYG editor could automatically update if changes are detected a la Google Docs. There are lots of potential ways of solving the 'git hard' issue. There is also the built in Obsidian Sync and Publish which use git behind the scenes and give you access to full version history although I don't know if they scale well or not.

At the end of day, conflicts in documentation are less of an issue when they do happen because they're not going to cause an entire crash of a program, you're just going to have some text that doesn't make sense. In the very worse case scenario non technical people could just copy and paste things back into place from git history. Other than time wasted, it's not the same disaster as if a code conflict is not resolved properly.
okay now it sounds like you just have a bone to pick haha. all software is bad, FAANG is much better than most
> there is definitely and provably "new tech" in here that can be world changing depending on how humans choose to use it

How so?
If you like RimWorld, I recommend checking out Stardeus.

The feel is very similar to Rimworld, but the setting is that you're a spaceship's AI system, and you have a bunch of humans in stasis. The goal is to find a habitable planet for them to colonize.

Was released last month and is still in Early Access, but it's definitely in a playable state.

The asteroid fields are brutal, build your ship like an onion with thick walls ;-)
Is that really useful though? As soon as you need to synchronize your dataset beyond the local PTP network NTP-based timestamping becomes useless. You need a local GPS-based time reference backing PTP.
This comes built in to vscode, you right click on any piece of code and select 'copy as github permalink', done.

https://i.imgur.com/hJ1WnZT.png
That's how software stagnates and dies.

> ... risk opening the flood gates for people rewriting things...

This sounds like "we feel that changes are needed but we will not be able control it".
Fusion 360 has a free version for personal use. I'm not sure how limited the simulation capabilities are though.
You need to know a lot about how to use a CNC such as tooling selection, milling strategies, setup, work holding, etc. that dramatically affect the result. It's not as simple as 3d printing, but yes obviously it's more technical and less 'analog.'
Edgar Allan Poe: Pioneering Mollusk Scientist
Time flies when you spend the night rimming.
One of the self-imposed play styles I've seen in youtube playthroughs is more of a band of mercenaries or bandits. They go from one settlement to another raiding the bases there and only survive on what they can steal. They basically ignore the colony management and base building aspects of the game and focus on building a team of absolute combat monsters all addicted to luciferium.
There's a setting to show a real-world clock on the right side. Just goes to show that it's something common.
At one point as a programmer at IBM, me, my manager and his manager were all woodworkers. Same explanation you gave.
It doesn't need to be a one-person dictatorship to be authoritarian. How long before this is coopted by politics that limit charitable spending on anything but projects that are "blessed" by this group?
Keeping WiFi and BT on usually means you're keeping the PCIe and USB links on (or at least waking up frequently), which means you're also preventing the processor from staying in a low-power state where all the IO is power-gated. Once the display is powered off, getting the rest of the components to be properly asleep can reduce idle power by another order of magnitude.
Noted management consult Nathan Fielder had an excellent idea to fix the computer repair business by hiring only asexual technicians. At least they wouldn't want to search your files for nudes.

https://www.cc.com/episodes/1xvf7u/nathan-for-you-computer-r...
My power could also drop out, my apartment could burn down, I could be hit by a car that day. Ultimately watching a specific movie at a specific time is not a very critical thing so I'm perfectly happy to accept issues in exceptional situation for the benefit of a much better average experience.
Or just download Github Desktop onto their machine and show them how to use it.
(Not the person you replied to, but a passionate rebase-preferred) For me there are two reasons - one aesthetic, one practical.

The aesthetic reason is that it tells a more coherent story. The codebase is a single entity, with a linear history. If I asked you "how old were you last year", and you asked "which me are you asking about?", I'd be confused. Similarly, if I want the answer to the question "what was the codebase like at this point in time // immediately prior to some point?", you shouldn't need to ask clarifying questions. `HEAD^` should only ever point to a single commit.

The practical reason is that it discourages a bad-practice - long-lived branches. The only vaguely compelling reason I have heard for merge commits is that they preserve the history of the change, so that when you look at a change you can see how it was developed. But that's only the case if you're developing it (in isolation) for a long-enough time that `main` will get ahead of you. You should be pushing every time you have a not-incorrect change that moves you closer towards the goal, not waiting until you have a complete feature! If you make it difficult to do the wrong thing _while also_ making it easy to do the right thing (too many zealots forget the second part!), you will incentivize better behaviour.

(Disclaimer - I've been lucky enough to work in environments where feature flagging, CI/CD, etc. were robust enough that this was a practical approach. I recognize this might not be the case in other situations)

And yeah, I'm kinda intentionally invoking Cunningham's Law here, hoping that Merge-aficionados can tell me what I'm missing!
the HN dupe detection is either stunningly broken, or (more likely) has been disabled: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33709786 and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33710180 are literally the same URL within an hour of each other
Tech layoffs be feeling it
One final thought..
Twitter isn't of any appreciable size anymore. :)
TIL! That is slick
And 4. The price was too high given any reasonable projection in the first place.
that's amazing. congrats
My money’s on GeoHot.
One more: it’s Facebook or all places teaching them
I think the part you’re missing is that the loved one died years ago but the body is being kept alive. There’s no personality left. Everything’s gone.

Alzheimer’s and dementia are incredibly cruel experiences for everyone involved. There’s no reason to prolong the situation.
I was attempting humor
Wasn't Michael Abrash harping on BSPs breaking down in the case of transparence and portais, in Zen of Graphics (the black book?)? Glad to see some found ways around it.
> your excellent comment

Are you being snarky? I genuinely can’t tell, sorry if you aren’t.

> trying to find the bit where the world would be better off if..

You’re right. I don’t genuinely know. I get the feeling more and more each day that our system is hardcore stupid broken.

My gut feeling is that the existence of Bezos and EA are, on the whole, part and parcel. Bezos is the product of a system that warps mankind around working to build empires for the few that win the Pareto distribution game. EA feels like the latest contemporary whitewash used to protect it.

Maybe I’m just a loser and I deserved to be fucked over at the grocery store and the doctors office for existing but not having more to give to my employer. I just wish my perception would catch up to reality.
He kinda did that (pantorouter, computerized box joint jig, slot mortiser, 3d router pantograph).
I made it up as a joke, sorry
It's not just that. If you can't trust the ABI then everything else is wrong too. Everything. Not just zeroing registers. It only just so happens that in this case XMM7 is used for zeroing, but it could be used to save a variable across a function call. Then there is no trick to get it set back to the right value.

The ABI is not optional, or best effort, or best practice, or any other BS that passes in the ordinary world. It is just as required as the correct operation of instructions (e.g., add should actually add things, mul should actually multiply them, and so on).
I would say that native LSP support in neovim has improved and stabilised a lot recently.
SpaceVim is also a fine contender with its LSP support: https://spacevim.org/
https://app.protomaps.com/downloads
Reminds me of another fabulous author, Nabokov, with similar fascinations, but for butterflies. [1]

There is something so exhilarating to me about these polyglots who can produce some of the best literature in the last 200 years whilst also finding time for scientific work.

1. https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/vladimir...
I'm merely pointing out the way that many average Westerners directly experience environmental regulations, and why they may become opposed to the idea, even if such regulation may be beneficial in some cases.

Having to go through a costly and time-consuming permit process merely to trim or remove a tree in one's front yard will leave a sour taste in one's mouth when it comes to environmental regulations in general.

Sometimes the regulation process itself actually causes more environmental harm than it prevents.

For example, somebody I know was telling me about how the environmental assessment process significantly delayed the replacement of a small, old, and poorly-maintained road bridge over a creek near the end of the rural road he lives on.

That project, which could have been (and eventually was) easily finished within a week with minimal environmental disruption turned into a multi-year debacle thanks to environmental assessments.

The bridge was closed to traffic the entire time, causing him and his neighbors to have to drive multiple additional miles each day to backtrack and detour around it, emitting far more vehicle exhaust and causing far more unnecessary wear-and-tear (including oil changes) than if the bridge has just been replaced without the delays that were imposed by environmental regulation bureaucracy.
This answer is causing me to giggle uncontrollably
And you can post a world on the forums and ask people for a "good embark spot" and they'll find different ones for you.

It's amusing what people consider "necessities" and "absolutely not" in embark spots; some people will never touch an aquifer, others it's not even something to look at.
I know a guy, who's great great, a few more great's, grandfather was part of a land race in Australia, where the rules where you could have as much crown land as you could fence in a day.

His ancestors smart trick was to fence across a peninsula.

Crypto is attractive because it has a lot of hype that make people think that it may be a viable way to get a first mover advantage and stake a claim on easy wealth. This thinking is IMO, stemming from the inequality that is present in modern society. Remember all those bankers that went to jail forever for the 2008 crash. Me neither.

It is easy to say, comparison is the thief of joy. But it's hard to ignore every single media source gaslighting you about the simple ability of others to live great lives whilst your lift may not be so flash hot.

Crypto is like a lottery ticket for a lot of people.
Are these hardened cpus? Do they run two in parallel executing the same code as previous cpus?
There were tons of users in the 90s who didn't have a clue how to use a computer—I mean even at a very rudimentary level—and just followed memorized or written-down steps, getting lost almost immediately if anything went wrong. Luckily for them, software was way less likely to throw up "what's new" modals seemingly at random, interrupting whatever they were trying to do, back then :-/ (edit: or to "improve" [pointlessly re-arrange] their UI while the user was away from the computer, for that matter)

If there are more of them now it's probably because computer use expanded 100 fold since then, at least, and the largely self-selected 90s users of the Web, especially, tended to have greater-than-average interest in learning computer crap, so a high proportion of new users were the can't-or-don't-want-to-learn sort. In the 90s a computer still might not be the centerpiece of an office worker or middle manager's desk, and most folks used computers very little at home, if they even had one (data I'm seeing indicates % of households in the US with a computer only hit 50% in 2000).
A rebase and a merge result in the same code. A rebase is more error prone though. Just because someone "feels" a merge isn't as safe doesn't make it so.
In other words, you've not talked to many (any?) Trump supporters, and are just speculating about what evilly evil things they might evilly support for their own evil ends. Or something of the sort.

The conservative end of the spectrum is generally more concerned with things like "a stable power grid with enough power at all times" than carbon emissions, though I know quite a few pretty hard conservatives with solar, hybrids, EVs, etc. And a good case can be made for all that stuff without bothering with carbon emissions at all.

And then you see things like California, within a week or so, deciding to ban ICE car sales in some fairly near future, and having to send out power announcements about "Please don't charge your EV during these hours." It doesn't take a genius to do the math that, hey, more EVs charging while coal power plants are turned down, that might be a problem. I think it's a solvable one, but "shouting down anyone who points it down as a fossil fuel shill" (as happens in some circles of the internet - not here, but I've certainly been accused it for some nuanced arguments about power systems) doesn't help solve it.

If coal with carbon capture has a future in the power grid... so be it.
Definitions of disability changed a lot over these decades.
Sorry mate, but this vscode extension does the same thing:
https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=hogashi....

but links directly to the code in question, no frills
> Can I ask why you think this is better? I just did some quick math, [...]

Others are discussing whether your math is correct, but the fact remains: it's murder, we shouldn't be killing people, period.
Well what other options are there? Self host services yourself?

Have cloud providers use a "partner" like in China?
Well, probably not on device ;-).

The underlying Reverie instrumentation layer works on ARM, but Hermit isn't ported yet, and we haven't touched RISC-V yet at all. (Contributions welcome!)

One thing we haven't tried yet is just putting a whole emulator (qemu etc) underneath Hermit. That would address any sources of irreproducibility that the emulator lets through from the host (threads, RNG, etc).
He was quoting Michael Scott.
Very briefly as a counter example - these folks made a thing that thousands maybe tens of thousands of people treasure. They've worked on it as a passion project and when ill luck befell them they had to scramble to secure funds. Yes, we live in a capitalist system but supporting neat art like this and exploratory projects is a societal investment that the US has stiffly refused to make. The more we provide social safety nets the more folks will be free to do experimental and artistic work and give us gems like dwarf fortress.

This isn't the fault of the United States - the US has made a choice in how the game works and they weren't playing by the rules laid out for them to follow. The expected course was for them to work in some job that robs them of their free time to produce a work of this caliber and if they had done so they'd be just fine... and we wouldn't have dwarf fortress.
I forgot that OpenMP is broken with llvm-amdgpu in Spack at the moment. I hope it will be fixed soon, because OpenMP is used in some of the tests. In the meantime, you may have to remove `--test root` from that install command.
My reading of it was that the bug was caused by XMM7 not being restored to its previous value.

E.g. on Linux, functions should restore the values of ebx, esi, edi, ... once they're done with them. The article says (on Windows) that XMM7 needs to be restored too.

If you can't trust one register being preserved (per the ABI), then you really can't trust the values of any registers.
Gambling addicts might be more accurate.
I would love to read their initial proposal that justified these investments in the first place
Yeah, I'm a big roguelike fan, too, but Qud just click work for me.

I say that as someone who has ascended multiple times on Nethack, gotten deep endgame in ADOM, etc.

I got really bored with Qud and never went back.
Try WhichIsAi – A simple game where you find an AI-generated image
I use paper lists for subtasks of tasks that are managed in JIRA.
Does running /bin/date under hermit always return the same time? Or does it just follow the same codepath to retrieve the actual time?
Super interesting.

I think using the name LuaJIT Remake steps on the toes of the existing LuaJIT and I would advise using a more original name.

Anything distinctive would be better. Lua DeeJIT comes to mind, since the generator is called Deegen.
Right, that's because the system libraries don't have the annotations. That's the biggest issue with it. But it still helps a lot if you're religious about it in your own code.
Genuine question, how is managing cross interacting virtual threads any different or easier than managing interacting threads? I say this and I am greatly looking forward to using Loom in production. It's definitely the correct way to go as opposed to async/await.
I did a smaller subset of what you mentioned as part in my first attempt at a PhD (since abandoned) around 15 years. What I did was to model relationships between banks with edges denoting interbank loans. Then I computed the eigenvector centrality (think PageRank) to characterize the "risk" taken on by a bank. This was later expanded to include things like mortgages, prime and subprime loans.

The idea was that you could later run simulations and what-if scenarios. Lots of agent-based modeling happening too once we had the structure up and running.

(this was done around the Lehman Brothers period, and there was a lot of interest in these kinds of works in Complexity Sciences).
Soup up originated in the U.S. in the late 19th century, though it wasn't widely used until the 20th century. Its exact origins are unknown, but it could be short for supercharge, or it might come from a horse-racing slang term for injecting horses with narcotics meant to make them run faster.

Interesting. I never saw it spelled like that before. Looks like no one knows how it should be spelled, so all variations are fine.
EDA Tools for Quantum Chips
Here is a video talking about molecular chirality and how nature really only produces one version of molecules https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKhcan8pk2w. If it picked up the molecules in the atmosphere those atmospheric molecules should have been made by life on earth and those have a handedness bias depending on the molecule, some are produced right handed only or left handed only because they are made one atom at a time and need to be one handed for life to use them. Abiotic synthesis produces a 50/50 bias of left and right handed molecules because they are made all at once.