skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> If I'm missing something here please explain why, but I've never found any documentation to be useful, except for libraries from outside your codebase. And even for libraries it is often easier and faster to just read the source code if it is available.

For simple packages, I understand.

For anything else, you are committing hyperbolic falsehood if you (or others) claim that it is "easier and faster to just read the source code" and "even for libraries", compared to reading examples/well-written documentation.
great on paper, irl no support
That's what made Docker popular.
According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satan, it means "Accuser" and "Adversary". Apparently (according to my foggy memories of a video essay about some high-art film) Satan was originally just the dude that would accuse you of all your sins you committed while mortal.
Compare to an extreme example of a market selling one watermelon for 5 dollars, and 5 watermelons for 15. Sure, the latter is a better deal, but I definitely have no use for more than one melon, and the arbitrage opportunity is not worth my time. In the same sense, I and many others do not need more than 1 deodorant at a time and I would rather save my space.
Musk does not own tesla
Back when I was a hippie, my (now) wife and I were eating

https://extension.psu.edu/garlic-mustard

at the park and a small child seemed highly curious that somebody would walk right up and eat a wild plant.
This regularly pops up in the Cleared world with people asking if it will interfere with a clearance.

I’ve had to advise multiple people it’s a very good way to be denied for a clearance.

The reasoning is simple for anyone who is curious: if there is anything that you are hiding from anyone that can be used to exert leverage over you that’s an instant issue that can cause denial or revocation of a clearance.
Janky long term kernel driver support. Essentially you get a minimally functional SBC OS, and then have to buy another SBC a year later as the kernel developers find something more interesting to work on.

The Pi are not just the hardware, but foundation and community maintained OS too.

A functional Pi GPU took herculean effort (hardware codecs etc.), and years of dedicated people trying to get mystery binary-blobs to work. I think the beagleboard are pretty good too, but have nowhere near the user-base of the pi.

Many people are now upcycling low-power micro PC thin clients, as they refuse to get price gouged for a pi4.
Ulcers, heart-attacks, kidney damage. But also they mask pain via reducing inflammation and the point of pain is to let you know something is wrong.

Like water it’s fine until you’re swallowing pill after pill.
Generative AI profits off your code. Make them pay for it
TL;DR our lawyers wrote a clause to protect open source code from being used by generative AI companies for profit. You can find it here: paytotrain.ai

A legal grey area exists as to whether publicly available creations (code or art) can be used to train datasets for generative AI projects without infringing their creators' underlying copyrights. Other types of claims, such as violation of license agreements and DMCA violations, require proof of damages to substantiate.

The legal solution we’ve identified is to add a specific damages amount to the license itself — a licensing fee. The failure to pay such a fee would cause the creator to suffer damages in the amount of the fee. By imbedding a licensing fee into a traditional open-source license, a creator can solve the proof-of-damages issue that could otherwise limit a claim under the DMCA or for breach of contract, and limit the fee to generative AI companies.

That’s why we built the Humans Only Clause. If you don’t want your code used by Copilot in this way, the Humans Only Clause can help strengthen your protections from use for training purposes. It’s a simple addition to your existing open source license to keep it free use and open source for other developers, but to prevent use without attribution by generative AI companies.

You can access the Humans Only Clause and insert it into your GitHub repo by going to PayToTrain.ai — we also built a payments form where you can set your own licensing fee depending on how valuable you believe your repo to be. If we get enough people using this clause, there’s a good chance we can assemble a separate class for a future class action, where each user gets significantly higher damages than what’s available statutorily under existing DMCA lawsuits.

On a philosophical level, we believe that the open source community is based on principles of taking and giving back to the collective. AI-based programming assistants strip away any attribution while drawing from the underlying contributions of the community. We want the open source community to continue to be open source, but we don’t want big companies to profit on our code.

If you’re interested, check it out: paytotrain.ai. We’d love to hear what you think
Does this touch on recent developments in information biology?
The world’s largest dam removal will touch many lives in the Klamath River Basin
>up to 32GB DDR4

Its up to 8GB at the moment
It would be nice if it used an international date format and not the American one.
Amazon would say it is merely the credit card processor, the
web store provider and provides ad space.

Same as if stripe, google
ads and shopify were used.

They don’t take possession of the items at any time. Even if they warehouse has them, they are in the same boat as uhaul or a storage company.
One of the names of Christ is "the Advocate" so perhaps God just has one really good lawyer, and Satan has the rest.
I was curious so I looked at the employment agreements for my last three jobs, and as far as I could tell, none of them explicitly forbade working elsewhere, nor required or expected 8 hours a day dedicated to work.

Still not sure though.
How long till market?
> What FTX situation? I have not given a cent to FTX, my kids have not given a cent to FTX, nobody I personally know have lost anything with FTX. More regulation (which in this case I don’t need) will cost me money spent to enable and enforce it.

"Empathy is the capacity to understand or feel what another person is experiencing from within their frame of reference, that is, the capacity to place oneself in another's position." [0]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empathy
Did it die? I only see a gray screen on iPhone
TikTok Dabloons
In my experience of highly paid tech jobs you're generally on salary and your work is managed by some clueless project manager with some notion of how many points you can accomplish in a week. If you find yourself in that situation, and you can do "40hrs" of work in 10 hours, getting a second or even third job of that nature seems like the quickest way to increase your earnings.
The thing is, your main goal to do multiple jobs is mostly money.

Once that's no longer a problem, there's no motivation.

You've started since 2019, give this lifestyle few more years and take proper rests.

Take a break atleast for few days in minimum 3-4 months, Never exceed 6 months for taking that break. Burn out is real, get's you messed up in mind if you don't take enough breaks.
General Ripper would fit right in today if you replaced Russia with the "Deep State".
You know things are looking bad if out of the gazillions of $ FTX laundered into the DNC they front-run their "reports" with the handful Republicans which were allowed to nibble at the trough.

Meanwhile, SBF is still not in jail and on the contrary even invited to speak: https://twitter.com/andrewrsorkin/status/1595517635441090565
`curl | sh` "installs" are not a good look on any package, and should be dropped -- you are absolutely right -- there is never an "uninstall" process.
Probably never or very rarely fraud.

If you work "at-will" there's explicitly no restriction against working multiple jobs unless its specified by an employment contract (which few people in "at-will" employment regions have).

Of course, each employer may have a policy forbidding it and thus could fire you on at-will terms if they found out, but that's a long way away from fraud in any legal sense.

Fraud is a lot more specific than just lying (either outright or as would be the case most often when it comes to having multiple jobs: lying by omission).

I'm not defending the act of working multiple jobs with full-time expectations here, I think in many cases it would be at best unprofessional, but it would take a very specific set of circumstances for it to come close to reaching the high bar of fraud.
> Arguably not true. The presence of large government and pervasive regulation may behave like the bike helmet paradox (Where cyclists feel they are able to take more risk while wearing a helmet, and motorists drive more carefully around helmet-less riders).

It's a paradox for a reason -- it is counterintuitive. Do you have studies or proof that "small government" may be helpful here, or is this a position that you hold from before that you are justifying here?
I've been seeing way more spam posts.
A work contract (or in some states even a work law) usually forbids working another full gig, so in virtually all cases those stories are severe work contract violations which get you immediately fired. Besides that, those stories are one of the reason why remote work gets more restricted. On a third point, i believe many of those people have mental health issues. It should be obvious that leading such a lifestyle isn’t compatible with a stable, truthful mental state. So i‘m not sure if there is a winner in this game.
It is usually a part time job. You would be expected to take other jobs.
You would be "lucky" to be taken seriously when comparing 1.5 years of recent history with other well-known periods that most people think of as decades in length.
>”The crypto crowd has been yammering for years "but this is different". Well, it's not.”

In what way? Some cryptocurrencies have been declared securities, while many have not. Those such as Bitcoin and Ethereum have been around for long enough that if they were going to be ruled as securities via Howey, that would have surely been done by now.
Just apply to another job and then don’t quit your original job.
Had humans the life-span of a mayfly, it might be tolerable to have this discussion every season.

Nearly 30 years ago, Clinton's "welfare as we know it" reforms were being normalized by the likes of the New Yorker/Atlantic/NPR smart set who were doing the heavy "interpretive labor" of explaining why poor trash waste hundreds of dollars (careful, those are 1990's dollars!) on crap like track suits and sneakers which ultimately reduced to so much status-quo-affirming "empathy". These discussions focused primarily on black people, not more generally on poor, disenfranchised people. The message was that you needn't worry about it because it was a "minority" problem.

Since then, how has the conversation permuted? It has simply become more performative and more mired in the vocabulary of race. Now that it is a problem of race, not class, one merely needs to be "empathetic", which, incidentally, is free.

During Clinton's reign, the discussion about the regression to a society with classes like the 30's (upstairs/downstairs) was handled more abstrusely than the easy pre-chewed treacle about racism/welfare (much easier to mouth platitudes or diatribes about black people or the villian du jour than address the fundamental unfairness between capital and labor). Whatever is systemic has to do with power, and power cares not a whit what you look like, how you talk, or what hole you prefer to fuck or be fucked in. People need to stop looking at the color or location of their fuck-hole and simply find solidarity in the fact they are fucked.

But this, like the possibility of the public lending-library being invented today, is nil.
The contract management procedure may appear complicated and daunting from the outside. It may seem impossible to keep track of every contract as it passes through each phase. It can be difficult to figure out what to do at any given moment, similar to trying to bail water out of a sinking boat.

The truth is that managing contracts isn't as challenging as you would assume. It is feasible to skip the filler and focus on what matters. You'll discover how to streamline the contract management process for your company in this free webinar.
As you increase the number of samples, you reduce the variance. So a small government of, say, 1 person, can either be 100% corrupt or 100% pure, but a larger government would approach the population level of corruption in expectation. Why is a larger governance with each individual holding less power less desirable than fewer individuals holding more power?
My mistake. He does hold enormous influence though, I would think.
Population density makes it easier to hide in a crowd and also easier to recruit teams of shoplifters. The estensive subway system in Manhattan makes it easy to escape underground. Due to traffic, police response times may be longer. Manhattan has dozens of pharmacies in the business areas, which makes it easier to hit several stores in succession and get a substantial haul.
Also if you're looking for a security clearance it's wise to have valid explanations for why you need all that money. Most clearances are denied because of financial-related reasons.
This is more than just dissent, though. I don’t think there’s a country in the world which wouldn’t criminalize active interference with its political process.
Mount SDs with "noatime" option :)
This seems straight up false.
There's actually an interesting point here. We can easily imagine a scenario where someone steals a bicycle, lists it for sale on Amazon, and ships it off to the customer themselves. Amazon was just a billboard in that case, kind of.

A fence is providing a few semiseparate services:

1. They will buy stolen goods. You get a lower price, but you don't have to face nasty questions like "how did you get this?"

2. They may assume the risk of policing. If you stole something surprisingly important and it gets thoroughly investigated, the fence goes to jail, and you don't.

3. They locate people who want to buy stolen goods. It's easy to conceive of this as a service they provide for their own benefit, after buying your stuff (#1), but in reality you can't really do either without the other one.

Amazon commingling inventory lets it provide service #2. The police can establish that a stolen object was delivered to an Amazon customer, but if it came from a commingled pool, they can't establish who sold it.

But Amazon's whole concept is to provide service(s) 1 and 3. This would make it fairly strongly parallel to a fence who, when the police show up, lets them know where to find you. But even then Amazon is still doing the largest part of fencing; usually the police don't show up. The hard part is locating the customers, and that's what Amazon does.
Did someone said about The Great Potato Cannon?
Typically most full time jobs say nothing about time commitments. In the old days, pre-remote work, presence was often valued more than productivity at many companies. Today, “presence” is about keeping your slack dot green. Could you pull off over-employment with a small startup? Probably not. But a couple of bloated corporations? Absolutely.
Kant knew this, too:

> The usual touchstone, whether that which someone asserts is merely his persuasion — or at least his subjective conviction, that is, his firm belief — is betting. It often happens that someone propounds his views with such positive and uncompromising assurance that he seems to have entirely set aside all thought of possible error. A bet disconcerts him. Sometimes it turns out that he has a conviction which can be estimated at a value of one ducat, but not of ten. For he is very willing to venture one ducat, but when it is a question of ten he becomes aware, as he had not previously been, that it may very well be that he is in error. If, in a given case, we represent ourselves as staking the happiness of our whole life, the triumphant tone of our judgment is greatly abated; we become extremely diffident, and discover for the first time that our belief does not reach so far. Thus pragmatic belief always exists in some specific degree, which, according to differences in the interests at stake, may be large or may be small.
WaPo going after its owner ? Interesting.
You could entrust a messenger to deliver a message long before electronic telecommunications.

But a trusted mail carrier and direct end-to-end encrypted video calls from/to anywhere on the planet are not even in the same ballpark. Trusted wire transfers and trustless peer-to-peer value settlement are potentially just as dissimilar.

I don't think it will take nearly 200 years for the scale of the difference to be as substantial as the difference pre-victorian mail and modern video calls. But it will take substantially longer than 13 years, that is pretty clear.

Even still, it is obvious to me (and many others) that this eventual future is inevitable-- and no amount of price fluctuation, scamming, or environmental concerns can shake that belief because these things simply don't even remotely address the core of what a foundational change this "tech" is in any way.
Signs and strings
> After about seven months of self teaching I landed my first job as a front end developer working with HTML and CSS.

> I went from making $40k in 2019 with my first front end gig to now on track to making $440k at the end of this year.

Dude is getting paid $220k per front end gig job?
If you rely on a web browser, aren't you still relying on millions of lines of code you're just not counting it?
Shoplifting is not violent behavior.
I often have to boot back into the live media because I forgot to install a tool like iwd while chrooted. This information is not included in the single page installation guide. Maybe it’s those scripts i’m unfamiliar with that would shorten the feedback loop.
There's a lot of things in work contracts that are not enforceable. Doesn't stop them from being put into the contract (it intimidates enough people to slow things down).

I'm going to need a bit more than "It's in the contract." What's case law and state law say about working multiple gigs? I know in most of the West Coast you can't claim IP developed outside work hours and not using work resources. Doesn't stop virtually every company here from trying.
I am not paying to read this
Look at what happened with chat when everything was using XMPP, and then it didn't and now everything is a proprietary silo again
Most jobs I have had are designed to apply pressure make sure you do the hours. Usually too much: I get behind on the 1 job and with the 40 and get pulled into rooms. I wonder where the laid back jobs are? Or do you have to mystify what you do. For example be the only k8s guy and then say “deploy a new cluster? give me a
week!”, and a
couple more days to
scale it up to 6 nodes!
Lightning works and it's easy for anyone to start using it now. Whether you want to discount it cause it can't immediately onboard the entirety of humanity within an arbitrarily short timeframe is just nitpicking because there certainly will be a protocol capable of achieving that absurd high bar for a trust-less blockchain.

Spoiler: eltoo & an upgrade with SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT along with channel factories seems perfectly capable.
He also owns less than half of SpaceX. But SpaceX's management is probably just fine with him going off and focusing on Twitter, they can do fine without him playing an active role.
Maybe if you tell them, "Well, then go to the bathroom every 30 minutes - it's healthier for you." then they will get the simple wisdom that we've survived so far following our internal signaling about our needs.
> I am afraid that the slow compilation of Rust is rooted to its inherent complexity.

AFAIK that's not the case.

The problem here is that Rust has "issues" with separate compilation due to some language design decisions (which affect incremental compilation than obviously). It's not built for that and it is, and continuously will be, quite difficult to make this work somehow.

But that's less a problem with the complexity of the language as such.

My Scala example stands: Scala is also quite complex and not the fastest to compile. But after the build system and the compiler crunched the sources once (which may take many minutes on a larger code base) the IDE is very responsive. Things like type hints or go-to def are more or less instant. Code completion is fast enough to be used fluently. Edit-compile-test cycles are fast thanks to the fact that separate compilation considerations were part of the language design decisions. (That's for example why Scala has orphan type-class instances; which are a feature and a wart at the same time).

As I understand Rust's "compilation units" are actually crates. This is not very fine granular and I guess the source of the issues.

I would guess splitting code into a few (more) crates (which than need to depend on each other) may improve the incremental build times. Also things like not building optimized code during development of course apply, but I think cargo does this automatically anyway.

But I'm not an expert on this. Would need to look things up myself.

Maybe someone else has some proven tricks to share?

…

OK, a quick search yielded some useful results, so I share:

https://www.pingcap.com/blog/rust-huge-compilation-units/

https://fasterthanli.me/articles/why-is-my-rust-build-so-slo...

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29742694
By the same token, bigger government allows more room for oversight and principled actors to dilute the effects of the unscrupulous ones.

As others here have alluded to, our problem is quality, not quantity.
Nope, just JS errors

[Error] SyntaxError: Unexpected token '='. Expected an opening '(' before a method's parameter list. (anonymous function) (libs.js:16558)

[Error] ReferenceError: Can't find variable: AbstractTreeComponent Global Code (app.js:4)

[Error] ReferenceError: Cannot access uninitialized variable. (anonymous function) (try.scroll.pub:17)
That's a good point.

But as soon as you've got someone else who needs to eat (cat->eat(), dog->eat()...), it is still better to go with a functional approach:

feed(person, bread)

Basically, my abstraction was bad for that case, but it is so much easier to move from eat(bread) to eat(person, bread) and then rename that to "feed" than to introduce object inheritance/composition and think about the commonality between dog and person if all you want to do is feed them.

Sure, there are cases where purely OOP approach is not burdensome, and may even be easier, but functional approach, as an explicit superset of possibilities, will usually be simpler and more understandable.
Tumblr's second wind. They seem to be on the right track.
If this person is making the money that they claim, doing things that sound like discovery would get them terminated and possibly legal action, why would they risk putting up a Web site about it?

Is the Web site going to turn into enough money to justify the risk to the $440K/yr. they claim?

Or do they not actually have those "overemployed" jobs -- and then this site is to generate money similar to the usual get-rich-quick scheme influencers, or to get dirt on people who sign up (for blackmail, or selling info to employers), or some other purpose?
You will not convince me you can complete "40hrs" of work in "10 hours," doofus.

That's just 10 hours of more effective work. The other 30 hours you're lying to me and cheating me out of what I'm paying you.

Of course, you can get away with it, because you're clever, there's way too much money in tech jobs sometimes, and people are trusting - and you deliver! Even if the work product is only meh; it's better than what those other chumps were doing, right?!

Until you get caught; until someone in the recruiting community in your field/stack/industry catches wind of this post or that post; or you slip up and double book stakeholder meetings; or your background check shows multiple employers; or ....

Hiring is guessing.