skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Instructions are not easy. I want a out of the box solution to help without having to deeply dig into the internals.

Something like archive team warriors: http://warrior.archiveteam.org/

For example,

> Bitswap vs DHT

I don't care. I want to help without having to care about these details.

> Launch one or multiple IPFS servers (see previous blog post; we currently use 4 servers in Docker).

what? how? where? link? no out of the box deployment?

> Alternatively, you can do what we did: add in offline mode first, add the files, then take the node online, peer with public gateways, and then finally run ipfs dht provide -r <root-cid>.

what? lol
On the contrary, I'm pointing out that "simpler" is meaningless in this context. The two companies face fundamentally different challenges and require completely separate skill sets. Some people will be better suited for Twitter, whereas some people will be better suited for SpaceX. For the same reason that you shouldn't commission a mathematician to remodel your bathroom, you shouldn't expect the CEO of SpaceX to successfully manage a social media company.

For further reading, I'd recommend this article in the Atlantic. The relevant portion is about midway through.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/11/elon-musk-...
Z-Library&#x27;s Tor Network Site Has Also Gone Offline
Considering the rate of progress, timestamps might need to be replaced with reference-invariant coordinates.
Even my "affected Edinburgh accent", as someone once described it, causes no end of trouble with voice recognition.
Did justice, medias, zuckerberg, meet with biden who told them to cover for him? No, who would believe in such conspiracy.

Does justice, medias, zuckerberg, biden, share an ideology that drives them to manipulate the masses? Yes, they are under the influence of the ideology of the WEF guru.

You need to realize we're way past conspiracy theories, we're fighting an ideology which has way too much power, such as making an election with mass manipulation, and religion has absolutely nothing to do with it.

I'd like to mention that I used to be on the other side, with the "anti conspirationists" and other "fact checkers" before realizing over time that I was on the wrong side of what's happening.
Apache NuttX is now announced as a Top-Level Project
> This is debatable. If they are renting out the houses this could reduce rents which would improve the lives of the poor who rent much more often than own. If they are sitting on them it's much more likely to be negative.

Large investors don't tend to be drawn to projects offering affordable housing to local residents because they are not as profitable as the alternatives. Many large European cities are currently suffering a housing affordability crisis driven in part by properties increasingly catering to tourists (esp. Air B&Bs) and luxury properties for investment for international high-net worth individuals.

> I'll give you that you shouldn't earn to give by working for Gaddafi. I think the vast majority of EA would agree.

It usually wouldn't be as clear cut and easy to spot a case as that. But for example, until the war in Ukraine, European law firms were happy to act for any number of Russian businesses or oligarchs, provided they don't figure on any anti-money laundering lists (themselves, often relatively simple to circumvent). Or say, an African business person who has acquired their huge wealth in domestic assets and infrastructure through nepotism and is salting away the wealth offshore or into Europe via various direct or opaque investments, all legally facilitated by big law firms.

>The third rule at 80,000 hours the biggest proponent of earn to give is

3. Doesn’t cause harm

Not causing harm is much harder to tease out than one might think. The first order effects might appear harmless, but what about the second and third order effects? Is one often even in a position to know given the levels of abstraction in global financial markets? Are you lifting up developing countries by investment, or unwittingly enabling more to be extracted from them than is being put in?
You should know that any so called leaks could be manipulated. As any other agenda that you can spot, leaks or not.

We live in post-factic time when anything can be disputed and I think its one of sign of healthy democracy.

TLDR you believe in leaks, others don't. At the end it's just a personal decision of what you want to believe.
> The complexity of your product has nothing to do with whether it is profit making or not.

Yes, this is my point. All this incredible AI engineering did not actually make Twitter a better product. They could have just as well not spent the money. The work was ultimately futile for Twitter, even though it might have advanced our understanding of AI and have incredibly practical applications elsewhere. Conventional measures worked fine.
I'm not really answering your question here but answering more in general regarding calls to functions bound from the lua c API.

There is trace stiching meant to help with code that does a lot of c calls. This was disabled in 2015 April 28 due to it being flawed but enabled again August 29 later that year with a working design.

Otherwise the recommendations are to reduce and maybe cache values on the lua side of things if you cannot use ffi.

Otherwise as mentioned in other comments if you can use ffi, use it. The performance benefit is significant.

The downside is that the ffi API is unsafe so in the context of a game development you'd have to be careful about third party scripts from modding or similar.

Another downside is if you cannot use jit (like on iOS) the performance hit can be worse than using the lua c api
I've written a few backend APIs with rust and I have to disagree. Not only have the frameworks managed to get the ergonomics similar to your popular GC lang[0][1], the natural lack of shared mutable state of HTTP handlers means you very rarely have to encounter lifetimes and a lot of the language's advanced features. What's more, now when I go back to work with other languages, I can't help but notice the significant number of unit tests I'd not have had to write in Rust. It doesn't have a Rails and Django but it's an easy pick over anything at the language level.

A note on performance, Rust's the only langauge where I haven't had the need to update my unit test harnesses to `TRUNCATE` tables instead of creating/discarding a separate database per test on PostgresSQL.

I'll also like to mention the gem that is SQLx[1]. As someone who's never been satisfied with ORMs, type checked SQL queries that auto-populate your custom types is revolutionary. With the error-prone langauge-SQL boundary covered, I was surprised just how good it can get making use of the builtin PostgreSQL features. Almost to the point that amount of effort the community's put to building great tools like Prisma.js and <insert favorite ORM> feel like a fool's errand (at least so for PosgreSQL).

[0]: https://github.com/alexpusch/rust-magic-function-params

[1]: https://github.com/juhaku/utoipa

[3]: lib.rs/crates/sqlx
Not necessarily. A big chunk of B2B doesn’t want this either. (Not the metering part especially)
A room, its occupants and its HVAC is a steady state system, with people emitting virus particles and the HVAC system removing it. The goal is to have the HVAC system remove virus particles quickly enough so that the average particle density is low. You don't need the air coming out of the vent to be completely aseptic; you just need to remove a significant amount of the virus on each pass.
Snowboarding is apparently great at doing that, with your feet facing one way and your upper body in another, with some compression thrown in. Less risk breaking something, there Skiing is much worse, but good to cause general wear and tear.

Torsion and compression are a great way to ruin joints so.
Yea, a single member set shouldn't require full enumeration, it's detectably the only operating device in context.

If it was the only "main light" across all rooms I'd hesitate to say the same mind you, nesting scopes should be respected.

What would you want it to do when you add a second light bulb? Tell you the old command is no longer unique or turn on both?
My somewhat limited understanding is that coppicing or especially pollarding requires significantly more labor input. Modern timber harvesting is very highly industrialized. I have never seen any kind of machinery or industrial processes for managing a forest for coppice. I suspect that another factor may be density of a managed woodlot, but again I am not in the industry, just an owner of a small bit of “forest”, so my perception may be off.
At least they tried to hide the fact that the task had no inherent value. There's no better way to destroy someone mentally than to make them perform an arduous yet pointless task.

If the intention was to maintain the team's physical fitness, surely there's a less injury prone exercise that could have been arranged. My guess is that the purpose was to condition you and your team to accept and perform a task without understanding the reason why the task was being performed.
> The "best" format for reading books is epub, as it is an opwn format which does not try to adapt a paper format. There are many free readers available for it.

I disagree. ePub assumes that the thing you are reading can easily be reformatted – for mathematics, technical documents, or similar, this is really not true. I've got a few technical books where the publisher released them as either a LaTeX'd pdf or an epub and on my iPad reading the ePub is _awful_ -- the layout is worse, it's very distracting, and the effort that the author put into ideally putting "this equation" and "this text referring to this equation" together has been lost.
This option is interesting for organizations that cannot afford a monthly license for dozens of developers. Drawbacks... after working a couple of months I can say that time to time there are awful issues that came from nowhere, you need to mantain cleaning things in WSL constantly, so if the company can pay DD avoid the painful way
Probably hours of up time is good enough, and let's say you're Assange or Snowden or Manning, I think the assumption should be that you're either fleeing the country or facing life in jail. They're gonna get you no matter where you distribute the information.
Or the numerous eyestalks of the Beholder, as the case may be.
The website has a clear and concise explanation of "Intel On Demand":

> What Is Intel On Demand?

> Align your infrastructure investment with your business demands with Intel’s API-enabled business offerings that deliver flexible consumption and configurations.

That answered all my questions.
Intel cuts CEO stock payouts amid layoffs
> Mastodon stores toots in HTML and presents that HTML to API consumers.

What. The actual. F.

How? Why? Who ever thought this was a good idea?

I would often complain about Twitter API, and how bad it was, but this is just beyond awful.
The most important NumPy object is an N-dimensional array type called ndarray. It describes a group of items of the same type. A zero-based index can be used to access items in the collection. Every item in an ndarray occupies the same memory block. Each element in ndarray is a data-type object object (called dtype). Any item extracted (by slicing) from an ndarray object is represented by a Python object of one of the array scalar types.
Ok, if your position is that you want ideological purity at the cost of all practical considerations, then fine, you'll end up with whoever Russia/Saudi Arabia etc wants you to have. I don't think that's a good practical trade off, but it's one you're welcome to make.
Outsource Web Apps to Afghanistan
I've worked as a developer for two distinct firms in New Zealand, and both of them outsourced their product development to the Philippines before we maintained it here.

I wish to assist the citizens of Afghanistan, where I am from. Therefore, if you run a firm and are working on a software project (Web). Let's connect, please.
> But how? Even if those interfaces were actually working, it's still extremely inconvenient to talk when you can click.

Smart home light/etc while hands are occupied like with a baby. But usecases are quite limited
Awesome to read about the memory management in Windows. (To me Windows seems to much of a black-box, but this is also because I only develop on Linux)
I never claimed they were trying to keep us of, more that they didn't care at all, the T2 chip was a major change and basically didn't function like anything that existed.

The reason I said it was a "worrisome trend" is because with the switch to M1: Apple would need to intentionally leave in a back-door if people had a chance of booting alternative operating systems.

Since they had not shown any interest in supporting alternative operating systems (outside of Bootcamp, which we knew was going away too) then it could be reasonably assumed that they would do no extra work to allow alternative operating systems at all.

Since it was extra work, and since they had not shown any care before.
I have been using NodeRed for past couple of year, running off my RPi. I must say, its been very a good replacement for Yahoo Pipes
Scottish Parliament does not have power to legislate an independence referendum
DeFi never claims to provide the exact same fiat and off-chain services as CeFi and CEX. It has specific goals, like replacing custody with non-custody, or replacing a centralized exchange with an automated market maker that no single party can control.

This has different risks and trade-offs, obviously, but users who opted for Uniswap instead of FTX as their crypto exchange are probably pretty happy with their decision.
You don't need to name content exactly. Saying "Alexa, play the sandwich song from Frozen" for example will correctly play Love is an Open Door. Ideally this kind of thing would work for TV and movies too, web searches as well.

Humans evolved language to communicate ideas, wants and desires to others for thousands of years. Obviously voice UI is not there now but maybe someday the experience won't be much different than asking the movie rental store clerk for their recommendations for a romantic comedy.
The only difference between exceptions and Result are that you need to change your return type to Result, and that you need to add a ? after calls that might fail.

There's also a bit of annoying typing stuff involved, but generally with something like the anyhow crate you can handwave that away too.
They also refuse to ever show a reference so that you can learn what you can say, or teach you any other way. Refusing to show and teach your users feels arrogant to me. They had to promise that you can "just speak naturally" and now they can't roll it back.

Meanwhile my success rate for the way I speak is below 20%.
For all those who keep spouting this Russia leaked it nonsense, former NSA technical director William Binney along with some others did the technical anaylsis which showed the leaker used a usb drive to copy the emails.

I also specifically remember doing a deep dive on the limited Crowdtrike report... which based their entire argument around a list of IPs in the Netherlands they somehow labelled as "known Russian IPs", but never provided any evidence for or methodology for.

The servers were never provided to the FBI, and Crowdtrike is extremely questionable as an organization for other reasons.

Furthermore, the accusation that Wikileaks was selectively publishing doesn't stand up to scrutiny, with it being fairly obvious in context they were trying to get leaked docs about Trump too. Even then, who was controlling the Wikileaks twitter then? I doubt it was Assange himself.

I started reading Assange when he was a cryptophreaker in the 90s, and it's been a wild ride to watch inteligence agency character assassinations become so effective at forcing a narrative that supposedly educated people around HN have gobbled up. I'm proud to see the pushback that does exist though.

All that said, Assange's childhood in what is likely to have been an intelligence front cult, has always made me just a bit wary of him, but to me it always felt more like a person who barely escaped and was transformed by it into what he became. (again, a lot of this context people don't know because they never read his stuff pre-wikileaks)
> I also believe that the espionage crimes that Julian is charged with are 100% horseshit, and going after journalists like that sets an incredibly bad precedent coming from a nation that purports to be a world leader in press freedoms.

Hillary was the secretary of the united states when those charges was written (and leaked). There was also reports about political pressure done by the US government directed at the Sweden and UK, allegedly to influence the legal case around Assange. Accusations was made, long before the election, that Hillary was the person responsible of authorizing and organizing those deeds.

Based on that I find the events of the 2016 elections to be fairly self-explanatory. It is just sad that we will never fully know the full extend of what Hillary role was as the secretary of US during in the aftermath of the cable leaks, or how much real involvement the US had in the Swedish and UK legal cases.
I think it has to do with privacy and the limitations on training data. Or am I being naive?
That's not accurate. You can mutate via shared reference too, as long as something ensures it's still thread safe (e.g. synchronized).

There's UnsafeCell type that is a deliberate loophole in immutability of types behind shared references. It's used as the basis for atomic access and mutexes.
> And yeah that would take effort to learn to use it right, just like any other programming language; so be it. This would be a hobbyist thing.

There are quite a few hobbyists working on local on-prem privacy focused voice assistans with conversation support.

https://www.home-assistant.io/integrations/#voice
https://www.home-assistant.io/integrations/conversation/

Have fun. It is a rabbit hole.
I'm going to hijack this post to ask for help locating a blogpost I read via an HN link a few (4ish) years ago. It was written by an academic studying infrastructure in the developing world. The subject was construction of a public transport network in a large city (Lahore? Lagos?), and his difficulties in obtaining reliable data from public sources on basic features like scale, budget, and schedule.

What made the post interesting was how he drily cited multiple official sources to show that none were in agreement. Something like "The new trunk line will stretch 74 km." [link 1] "It cover 89 km end to end." [link 2] "All told, the line will add 107 km of new track." [link 3] etc. etc.

So basically it functioned both as an account of his research and a tacit commentary on the problems that arise from dealing with unreliable official sources. If that rings a bell for anyone, I'd be very grateful for a link!
In fact, Google had, it was called the "Google Mashup Editor" and was closed in 2009.
It's like the seat heater in a BMW or high performance mode in a Mercedes.

How can we fight it as consumers?
If you assign it with "= null", you get the warning. If you assign it with "= null!" (note the exclamation mark, the null-forgiving operator), you do not.
> But how? Even if those interfaces were actually working, it's still extremely inconvenient to talk when you can click. You have to be somewhere where talking out loud doesn't disturb the people around you. That excludes most situations: open space offices, restaurants, coffee shops, public transport, cars with passengers, and most places in the home except maybe the bathroom.

I would separate out the two, actually. There's a "natural language control system for the entire OS" and then there's the actual voice part. Voice is often mostly useful for accessibility purposes -- hands full, running, driving, etc. However, the other side is that a text-based NL assistant would also be profoundly useful. On iOS, you can enable "Type-to-siri" and you can just type sentences and Siri will respond back in text.

If we make progress on NL-driven command-lines, we can actually make progress on voice-assistants, and vice versa. The catch is that the voice side still needs recognition work.
I'm not an expert, but I've never heard of such severe symptoms in ADHD cases. I think you should really consult a psychiatrist.
B2B: You think more granular control of how their goods are used will benefit Intel's business consumers? That Intel won't carefully adjust every parameter to extract the maximum value from each business?
Let's be adults and call "piracy" by its real name: unauthorized copying.

Let copyright holders deal with unauthorized copying, why should any layman care about it?
Order of Battle
That is a very reasonable point and I have been trying hard to be objective and avoid "grass is greener" thinking.

From the short periods when I have worked in offices in-person, you are correct that the lion's share of the time is spent working alone on projects just as it is when working from home. However, where I did internships, I made friends among my colleagues and would eat lunch with them (and Fridays everyone went to the pub for a longer lunch); further, people would talk to each other in passing while we were working and there was a distinct feeling of "collective enterprise" and solidarity that helped to push through the inevitable tedious aspects of the work. Even though the socialisation wasn't often at all work-related, it made the work easier and more enjoyable. I do accept that this argument is dependant on working in a company whose social culture is suited to you, which is not easy to find.

All that said, there is nothing that can compare to WFH for "deep work," where you know what you are doing and just need time to get on with it withoug anyone breathing down your neck. For that reason, I don't think I could ever work full-time on-site and would always aim for a balanced hybrid model, if given the choice.

I guess a lot of it comes down to solitude vs loneliness: the line between the two can be distressingly thin.