skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That’s fair! The 10% Giving What We Can is a minority of EA in general, specifically people who subscribe to the idea of “Earning to Give”. There are other ideas too, such as people who argue working in nuclear policy is important, or AI Alignment research, or one of my favorites Allfed [0]. Personally for me, a non-degree holding individual who would still like to use my career to benefit others, donating a chunk of my pay check to charities saving the most lives is my form of ‘effective altruism’.

[0] https://allfed.info/
Windows ME + Litestep shell made my old K6 Athlon machine I had as a teen a lot more usable.
"The big picture: The fact that analysts still think Tesla should be worth $290 a share — 70% above the current market price of $170 — reflects the difficulty the market is having in adjusting to the new reality of higher interest rates."

Don't analyst price targets come with a timeframe? If an analyst is predicting a 290 price target 1 year from now, what good is it to compare the current price.

Unfortunately the Bloomberg article linked is paywalled.
My impression was that it merely searched through the large collection of articles and then briefly summarized them? Maybe the bears in space output is a result of articles about water bears, i.e. tardigrade articles?
If I just want an (electric) car that gets me to work and back home safely, I think I should like optional subscriptions. Hopefully it makes the base model more affordable.
Pro-AI articles are all the same as well. "AI will be so useful!" It's boring and predictable.
"Rust is the best, Rust is better, every other language sucks, let's rewrite everything in Rust"

Come on, Rust has been here 16 years and its market share is as good as Ada.

These evangelists are the major reason in addition to its stdlib is not dynamic-link friendly that pushed me away from learning Rust.
I'm incline to agree, but the driver is the most dangerous because we _assume_ that the when the driver pushes the gas or the breaks they will work.

In the age of the accelerator and break going to software systems instead of mechanical systems, it is 100% possible to crash that software and all the sudden you cannot break.
How many of these headlines do we have to read (representing multiple orders of magnitude LESS funds stolen compared to SBF) before SBF is in handcuffs?
Sorry for the bad experience, I had a service outage for a while
I still feel like they missed out on the obvious move: charge money for Yahoo Pipes.
The old school method is phpBB [1]. It has fine grained controls about who/what can upload, who/what can see and who has real time posting privs vs. requires moderated approval. It is the most versatile and battle hardened solution I have ever seen. If using this, steer clear of the addons. The built in controls while not super obvious at first, are very powerful.

[1] - https://www.phpbb.com/
> using structs or other basic data structures instead of objects has visible performance benefits in SBCL if you care about that for some reason.

Sure, but recall that CLOS really consists of two distinct components. The class/object system, and generic functions.

Since CLOS is baked into the CL type system, generic functions will happily dispatch against DEFSTRUCT types (as well as all of the other types, not just objects). Add the ability to :include other DEFSTRUCTS, and the idea that when DEFSTRUCT B :includes DEFSTRUCT A, then the type-of of B is both as a B struct and an A struct, then you get back alley inheritance using structures.

So, now (in theory) you get the efficiency of DEFSTRUCT, but all of the dynamic dispatch giddy goodness of DEFMETHOD, when and if you want to use it.

It can be a really nice compromise.
Amazing guide, thanks!
Who ranks better was my word play, because of PageRank :') But yes, I totally agree with what you wrote and I will aim for more detailed comparisons in the next articles. And you are right, NetworkX is easy to use Python library, and I wanted to show that Memgraph is also easy to use and Python friendly, as well as fast. It also has a bunch of popular graph algorithms already implemented, so if anyone is working with graphs and NetworkX, the performance gain of Memgraph introduced in this article may be useful to them. Regarding Neo4j, wait for it ;)
I noticed a lot of developers rave about flexbox, but not so much about grid.

It is my understanding that flexbox was intended for 1D layouts and grid was intended for 2D layouts. We've been using grid for the overall page layout and flex inside certain regions.

Is there something I am missing here, or are we finding that the hammer is pretty good at screws too?
Ignoring the cost for a second, I don't want max possible acceleration all the time. Modern gas pedals are already sensitive enough, no reason to need an even lighter touch in stop+go traffic.
At least with Tesla it's slightly less bad. Their acceleration boost is a one-time purchase, not a subscription.
Turning up MAX_TORQUE_ALLOWED will almost always increase failure rates.

Selling a warrantied MAX_TORQUE_ALLOWED increase makes perfect sense.

Of course, it’s tough for us to know without getting someone to leak internal numbers.
It's not quite as straight forward when it comes to ECU reprogramming/tuning. While it seems legal to modify an ECU or use an aftermarket ECU, states like California now won't allow cars with these sorts of mods to pass smog tests, and there's nothing to stop manufacturers from voiding your warranty for soft-modifying the ECU. It's a small leap for states to decide that not having the latest ECU firmware causes a failed smog test or even an "emissions fine" regardless of the actual exhaust composition.
Color Name Abstractions
They already do. A modern corolla will lose access to remote start after an initial free subscription period.
I know absolutely nothing about neuroscience. When I read a claim about handwriting notes having more brain activity than typing notes, it seems like additional.. overhead (pun).. to accomplish the same task: memorization. Less brain activity to accomplish the same task of memorization would imply efficiency, wouldn't it?
The funny thing is, of all the areas where ML could help, radiological image classification definitely is the one where ML could shine (and I think it did). HUmans doing radiological image classification are basically a network service now (IE they can do their job on the other side of the world, and their efforts are extremely carefully evaluated using later data such as disease progression).
Like the way Python have threads lol.
Emacs has generators too, and there are promises implemented on top of them, but they aren't very useful in the elisp ecosystem because at some point you are still going to have to poll due to a lack of a JS like event loop that users can submit tasks to.
It makes sense to me. The same as claiming that doing `1 + 2` in OCaml is making use of the type system despite me not writing any type information and the language performing type erasure.
> The single most dangerous part of the car is the driver.

this is only because we have incredibly high safety standards when it comes to cars.
I don’t understand how this language is planning on ever seeing adoption when it’s been restricted from open use since it’s inception. Seems like vaporware.
What if it wasn’t someone else’s email, but your own with an existing account? Can you re-associate your order with the existing account?
Sorry for the bad experience, Noctie got stuck for a while due to a bottleneck in my cloud setup
Every time I read this I appreciate its sublimity.
I have multiple emails, and this never turned out to be an issue - worst case i just try all of them.

But if you want to improve the implementation, the provide can also decide to send an email in case no account is registered with that email address - "Hey, someone tried a password reset for this email, but there's no associated account. If it was you, ..., if not, ignore this email."
> "AI so overhyped" is a pose, not an argument, an investment thesis, or a career plan. But hey, you do you.

> Anyway, I hate to be defending anything Meta-related, but this article is slanted trash, its sources haters who have only one, incredibly repetitive thing to say about AI, and the author is a hater.

I was hoping someone else would also find the actual context and background for what is clearly a poorly written hate piece.

I have very little interest in Meta, but the amount of FAANG hate that the media knowingly perpetuates and the amount of criticism that anything launched receives, would absolutely wear someone down. Lecun is no saint, but the article is very unfairly written.
add 2) Well, from an outsider perspective (not a US-citizen):

If A commits a crime (or does something forbidden, not sure if it's a crime in the US) and B does the same, B cannot say that "Well, I did it, but so did A!"... well, they can, but in general the expectation would be that both get punished if there is evidence for both "crimes"

Saying "but everybody does it" should either lead to a change in the law or an execution of said law, meaning persecution.
> The unknown unknowns should worry you, and AI is full of them.

Sure, but where should that rank in my worries relative to 'designer babies' and 'rise of authoritarian states as economic powerhouses' and 'corporations that can commit crimes with impunity' and 'rising medical bills' and 'widening gap between rich and poor' and 'far right extremism' and 'water shortages' and 'economic crisis wipes out my savings' and 'cyber warfare targeting vital infrastructure' and 'rising obesity' and 'voter suppression' and the many other things a person could worry about?
It's the same for politics, etc. I also don't want to hear about what their office looks like, etc.
One of the most intense and fun user bases I had was in HPC at an academic healthcare research institute. I've also worked in high energy research.

When most folks think of academia they think faculty, but staff vastly outnumber then. Contrary to popular belief there are legions of cold, level headed, engineers that get shit done.

A lot of the research isn't some random study of something that may or may not be useful in half a century or more, it's often immediately applicable and winds up in products or shaping government policy on a global scale. Especially the well funded ones.

But we don't hear about that stuff. We hear what the media and tech companies are currently trying to cram down our throats.
Seems like something pretty easy to make an aftermarket "fix" for
Works great for me.

I suspect it might be an issue with your specific pair of AirPods, which sucks. Sorry.

Don't know if it's something you could get them exchanged over at the Apple Store.

Might also be radio interference, something to do with your room or even your clothing.
This is what #[allow(clippy::whatever)] is for.
If the GP is assuming that initial password setting is done via the verification link sent in the verification email, then the workflow they're proposing won't cause the confusion you describe. In other words, the "verify my email address" link is to a form that says "Create and verify password to confirm your email address."

If you're assuming that initial password entry is done before email verification, then there's a possibility for confusion there.

Honestly, the lowest friction workflows collect information lazily. Don't require setting a password (if at all... expiring login links in emails are a nice alternative) until the email is verified. Don't require a mailing address or credit card number at all, but have a "save for later" checkbox/button as part of the checkout workflow, etc.
> The curtain closes, and RISC-V has replaced it.

For Intel? That would even be a slightly less absurd statement than for ARM.
I'm not sure if someone has mentioned this already, but if someone has gone down the path to allow enumeration (username check during signup, which is immediately returned ton the user), I would say this is a strong argument where you could protect yourself against enumeration more easily..

The amount of times a user will likely type their username/password incorrectly is going to be a lot higher than those who attempt to re-signup for an account. Therefore adding additional protection to the signup page (hard rate limiting, bot-protection) then aids to stop this username/email enumeration without the need to be as strict on a login page. This is also compiled with ip-based rate limiting/bot protection that can get very frustrating for users within a corporation that have single public IPs for all their users.
Why? You have to make choices regardless of trust anyway.
Major tax-filing websites share income data with Meta
So then this is the actual problem, yet Wikileaks was criticized for telling (part of) the truth?
Can I humbly suggest that it's definitions and instances 'all the way down'
The acceleration pushes your back into the seat, and you brace yourself by pushing your foot harder against the floor (gas pedal). It's an instinct thing, not a physics one.
“transmitted only to you” doorbell is streaming to the cloud
If that artefact presents as keeping certain subjects or articles within the bias of the dominant group, it is pretty much controlling "truth" in that way. But, yes, I don't think Wikipedia has a shadowy board of Cigarette Smoking Men or anything.

But there are other entities that seem to do a reasonably good job of being impartial (e.g. BBC), I just don't buy the idea that Wikipedia is very special (or especially effective) in regard to neutrality.
That's what I've always done, with an upper limit of 1.

More seriously, this just kicks the can a little bit.

"Already people can chuck a + in the user part...so really there's not much point trying to maintain a 25:1 user to email ratio"
As several replies to these tweets have noted, the author works for Semafor, a Bankman-Fried backed outfit. That doesn’t change the letter. But the commentary, which reduces what increasingly looks like gross negligence, embezzlement, theft and fraud to “just a bank run,” should be ignored.
If this doesn't demonstrate how over-reaching and insane police power is I don't know what will. I'm a privacy advocate but also generally don't support shrinking police head counts / general "defund" narratives (as I've lived in NYC and seen the direct negative results of these policies).

Do police need armored vehicles, body armor, and assault rifles (or access to this kind of data) NO.
Wrong. "Here is a totally mind-blowing new thing AI will let you do this week that humanity could not do last week" is an endless source of novelty and eyeballs. Source: Am a publisher in this space and have seen the engagement numbers. You are the guy in the meme standing in the corner of the party, with the words "They don't know AI is just math" printed over his head.
The distinction that we often have trouble getting across is between eliminating/controlling nondeterminism, vs recording what happens to occur.

Undo, like rr, and Microsoft TTD, records basically all syscalls, but doesn’t determinize anything in the original execution, only in the replay. A “hermit run” call is like a 0-byte recording —- no nondeterminism so you can “replay” by just running again.

On the overhead, the largest factor is the means of program instrumentation. I don’t know where rr sits, but I’ve heard Microsoft’s solution is quite performant on Windows.
For anyone not interested in installing foreign OS, I like to use Chris Titus' tweaks.
https://christitus.com/windows-tool/
Firefox gives me this error:

Secure Connection Failed

An error occurred during a connection to ooh.directory. PR_END_OF_FILE_ERROR

The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the authenticity of the received data could not be verified.
Please contact the web site owners to inform them of this problem.
> unless something is done

We must do something.

This is something.

Therefore, we must do this.
It's not going to be for people convicted of multiple DUI's.
My Model 3 was enabled for “performance” just by software download. Supposedly the motors are binned for performance but they are the same motors, at least the 2018 models.
But that's not the acceleration doing that. That's you doing that.
Regarding the hallucinations, the doctor said it's still early. So he told my mom if she sees something scary, just remember it does not exist. Always check with someone around you. Try touching it and make sure of yourself. I guess if hallucinations get worse tablets may be required.

She stays at home all the time. The bathroom is just a few steps away. So incontinence hasn't been a major problem. When we go outside, there are always diapers.
> I am not aware of models that use birth month to make loan decisions, but if that's a useful predictor, why not include it?

Because it's fucking unfair, and humans hate feeling like they've been wronged for unfair reasons they cannot control. How would you feel if your loan got denied, you asked why, and you found it it would have been approved if you had been born in April instead of June? Don't pretend you'd love it and smile. You'd rant about it and tell all your friends how bad that lender is.

If the lender rejects you because your debts are too high or your income too low or something, or the zip code of the home you're mortgaging, that makes more sense and feels more relevant and in your control, at least.

Yeah, it's nice from the point of view of the lender, but the cost is too high to society.

Society feels so strongly about this that (in the USA) we've even passed all kinds of laws about what pieces of information are absolutely banned from being used to determine who gets a job or who gets a home. If you are a landlord or hiring manager you have to be aware of them so you can at least pretend to comply.

Sometimes I wonder if AI is already here secretly. Half of my replies on hacker news seem to basically boil down to teaching what humans are actually like.
Why I’m thankful for Universal Control on my Mac and iPad
It might also have had something to do with having a planned economy unable to fulfil the most basic of the population needs, from food to toilet paper. Rather shocking for a country that used to be Europe's wheat exporter before installation of communism and Russian-controlled puppet regimes.
Half the web has a CAPTCHA just to view content. Thanks, Cloudfare.
If you have multiple DUIs, you should absolutely not be allowed to drive until you’ve been proven sober for a long time (many years). And honestly, even one DUI is enough to remove your driving privileges for years in my opinion. There’s no excuse for driving once you’ve had alcohol. You can just choose not do it, it’s not like you can accidentally drive after having too much alcohol.

We should have significantly better public transit, to make this more humane. But so many people drive dangerously and cause huge amounts of deaths. I think a better long-term fix is to have good public transit so that people have better options and don’t feel like they need to drive everywhere.
Software engineers looking for a job should consider the chip industry, which is not just about hardware engineers. Plenty of software engineer openings https://semiengineering.com/jobs/ and many are remote
While the author's anecdotal evidence is coherent, it's not enough to establish causation. Especially if the measure of productivity is feelings of sluggishness.

Rust or not, there's an argument to be made for statically typed languages improving productivity over the long run [0].

All development can feel sluggish depending on the work hours, estimates, business timelines, engineering skills, and the task at hand.

Programming languages are common targets because
- we use them so much
- there are so many
- and all developers, at some point, must choose to dedicate their time to one over the others.

Finally, productivity itself is only one performance characteristic. To focus only on that (without even a good definition of effect or measure) makes content precisely what the author claims to avoid; flame bait.

[0] - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338162224_A_Study_o...
There's a new project to make IPFS very performant (within limitations of the protocol, ofc). They've got some really great goals, hope they succeed.

TBH i love IPFS, and i wish i could get behind it and help.. but ever since they starting making Crypto i have moved away from it. I have no way of knowing if they're working on IPFS or if it's merely a means to a Coin.
Amen. People are amazed when I fire up SysInternals 'ProcMon' and show them how many hundreds of thousands of times their AV fires off in one single minute of monitoring. ()

I'll grant that kind of sustained checking is what you need to combat malware on Windows. But it damn well does have an effect on the overall system responsiveness.

() I did a q-n-d check; 1.3M events, and almost 300K were AV/Malware.
The federal government is most likely investigating and needs time to bring charges. Watching and waiting gives them time to gain witness cooperation and obtain evidence to bring the strongest charges possible.

The Feds have probably already interviewed SBF and will make sure he does not flee. In the meantime, it’s much easier to let him dig his own grave. He’s already made numerous incrimating statements that simply would not have happened in a holding cell.

The Bahamas may also be planning to bring their own charges, though they are likely to let the US take him first.
Dupe: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33720713
I think a lot of packages are not yet using threads. And to be honest, I'm a bit scared of packages starting to use threads because there are a million ways in which you can mess up with threads especially given Emacs’ architecture. What if two threads start manipulating the same buffer? Emacs wasn’t built with these scenarios in mind. But perhaps I'm too pessimistic and there are good answers for that.
Sometimes it helps to approach these things at a meta-level.

What would it mean if cells were machines? Would that make humans machines? Maybe this is the problem author has.

Other articles on the site which might be considered controversial:

> Organisms Are Not Made Of Atoms

https://www.subanima.org/organisms/

> Why Biology BREAKS Physics

https://www.subanima.org/biology-breaks-physics/
This is complete nonsense. In the past it was normal to have that extra weight in your car and no seat heater button because you didn’t pay for it.
Tesla already provides a faster acceleration software upgrade. Mercedes just copied them.
We're going to come full circle.

In the olden days they used common parts because the manufacturing and the tracking of the parts in your inventory system was expensive.

Now we're gonna push to reduce part counts because the cost of the engineer and the amortized cost of corporate process in which he works are expensive.
CSS is grid is newer than Flexbox and has lower browser support, caniuse says 99.74% vs 96.95%. Overtime I imagine we'll see more utilization though

• Grid usage: https://caniuse.com/?search=css%20grid

• Flexbox usage: https://caniuse.com/?search=flexbox
> The alternative is rewriting the code of Go into Rust or vice versa.

This is more work up front, but it’s better engineering.

> easier and less time consuming

Have some pride, jesus christ.