skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
practically all website that use an email as username nowadays require email confirmation, so already include the context switch. Because in the end, sending an email is the only way to verify that the email address is correct and you don't want an incorrect email address in your database if you rely on that communication channel.

Now, if you have accounts in places where email addresses are not required and usernames take the place, the calculus may change. But using the context switch as an argument here is just weak.
I think almost all problems with my computers so far have been bad memory or OCZ SSDs. But the performance hit you take for games and some other things is also very real and big. The very best DDR4 ECC memory on the market is DDR4-3600 CL16-19-19-39, which a) is not a good bin to start with, almost certainly with bad tertiary timings and b) costs more than twice as much as equivalent non-ECC.
One problem I find is that the issue has become extremely polarized in the US, and that there is little room for 'middle ground' opinion. In many cases, it ends up looking like a classic scene of 2 people arguing from emotion, rather than reason, unable to budge until one side capitulates and gives up talking.
I replied to LeCun's claims about their latest protein structure predictor and he immediately got defensive. The problem is that i'm an expert in that realm and he is not. My statements were factual (pointing out real limitations in their system along with the lack of improvement over AlphaFold) and he responded by regurgitating the same misleading claims everybody in ML who doesn't understand biology makes. I've seen this pattern repeatedly.

It's too bad because you really do want leaders who listen to criticism carefully and don't immediately get defensive.
Now this is not the most politically correct statement. But I wonder what is the similar situation say in China or other major non west countries? I think in China voice AI is more hyped.
No true Scotsman. V**sh is cursed/cringe/etc., but we can't exclude his fans from the label merely on the basis of his ideology being garbage/wrong/anglocentric.
Inequality has existed long before computers and is a social problem not a technical problem. You don't solve social problem with technical solutions since people are clever enough to simply find the next tool to enforce the social status quo using.
Valid reasons for hating on art? This honestly feels like the author is trying to justify being a negative person instead.

I don't disagree with providing feedback, but to "hate on" something is very different than providing feedback or constructive criticism. And of all things, more so art than anything else. Art is someone's personal expression. To "hate on" it is implicitly an attempt to invalidate that person's expression, if that were even possible. Are you being a judge of what someone should or shouldn't be expressing?

Per the author's "not my cup of tea" comment, I do believe that is actually a better approach. Because you are simply expressing that it's not something that you connect with/enjoy/appreciate/etc. and making your comments about yourself. When you "hate on" someone's art, you're completely missing the fact that your strong feelings are _yours_ and that the artist's expression is completely independent of that (whether others share your sentiment towards the work or not).
>On lichess? I been hovering in at 1300+-50 for the last year... I can barely beat stockfish 2.

Yes.

Stockfish 2 is pretty easy, play solid and it eventually does something ridiculous to earn its lower rating. The trick, you have to see the mistake. Basically punches itself in the face, you have to survive until it does this. Make sure everything is defended.

Stockfish 3 is when it starts playing reasonably and only makes a mistake when you've put enough pressure on it.

Stockfish 4 you have to play against it. You need to see depth of about 3-4 moves for both of you and you should beat it every time.

Stockfish 5 is hard, it's seemingly giving you tricks, but if you look at the trick its a crazy computer line where they manage to barely hold on or in most cases you shouldn't have taken what it was giving.

>I've found stockfish at these lower levels doesn't play like humans at all. It will play a near perfect game for 25 moves and then all of a sudden make a horrible and senseless move. If your style is slow and defensive I think you probably fair better. My style is hyper aggressive and stockfish crushes me :)

From my experience stockfish never plays like a human. I do recall there are some bots on lichess which were machine learning to play like a human.

Alas I'm 1100 rated according to op.
I'm in a fourth category. I just want a simple imperative language with a solid type system that is reasonably fast.

While Rust isn't simple, I don't know any other languages that fill this space.
How to find endpoints exposed to attackers in the Google Cloud
Whether they held on to documents for strategic reasons, as you claim without presenting any evidence, doesn't concern me at all and it shouldn't concern you. What matters is whether the published documents were genuine leaks, and for all that we know they were. That's why Wikileaks was prosecuted and is being destroyed.

Imagine you leak some important classified information to Wikileaks and they don't publish it. You'll just send it somewhere else. There are hundreds of journals and thousands of journalists to whom you can alternatively send the information. It's frankly speaking stupid to claim that not publishing a leak "for strategic reasons" could somehow be harmful. It is also worth mentioning that journalists do that very often for a vast number of reasons such as national security, their own security, protecting contacts, protecting sources, fear of legal repercussions, political agenda of the editor in chief, etc. There is nothing special about Wikileaks in that regards.

What was special about Wikileaks was their policy of publishing everything with only minor redaction and, most importantly, without asking the befriended intelligence community for the green light first. That's what normal news outlets tend to do, unless they have a very high level story like Watergate.
It would be tricky whatever the claim
I think we disagree on the definition of "a lot". Were there even any permanent settlements on the Canadian prairies? Most of the natives were nomadic.
All the main K8s vulnerabilities from 2022 consolidated into one article. Put together by Ben Hirschberg, founder of ARMO, the makers of Kubescape.
To test if someone is being loving, or faking it, one could use the below "official bible definition". ;). (often read out at weddings which is pretty important for people deciding to spend decades together)

"1 Corinthians 13:4-8 NIV

Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres. Love never fails. "

I think 2 obvious bits of this missing when people fake it are "it is not self-seeking" (just like you said) and "rejoices with the truth". I don't think it's that hard to tell, or rather, if its hard to tell if someone is being loving or not, then unfortunately they probably aren't.

My 2p.. YMMV etc ...
You also have the option of paying up front for the optional heating. This has long been a pay-ahead-of-time option that you had to specify before the car was manufactured. They are now giving you the option of having a subscription instead, and putting the hardware in the car. In reality, nothing has changed because the same pay-ahead option is still there.

Does that answer your question, or is my answer not clickbaity enough?
Generally the fans are powered with a steady state DC source and the PWM is just logic signaling. If the fan is powered by a PWM source the tach output will not be a clean square wave (but could still be reconstructed, if the PWM frequency is sufficiently higher frequency than the fan's rotational speed).
You must live in a major metro. I live in a medium size town in a rural state, I haven't had two-day prime delivery in years. Typical minimum is about a week
it would be helpful if there was some sort of rss aggregator functionality. Ie google reader that used to be.
I'll put it quite simply. If you promote an ML system that is ostensibly a scientific content generator, the expectation is that it will regurgitate facts, not lies. If you can't get that right, don't release it, except to publish a "negative results" paper.
What about them? Just select Linux from the OS dropdown.

https://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx?lang=en-us
Leap-seconds are a fundamental part of the definition of UTC. Declaring a leap-second doesn't amount to declaring a new timescale. Abolishing the leap-second, however, does declare a new timescale.
Based on this post and others, Andrew Gelman seems to be hostile to DL. Why is that the case? Is it because it’s not Bayesian?
Your implication is that Ghana failed where South Korea succeeded because they didn't work hard enough.

Of course people in South Korea worked hard to get where they are. So did people in Ghana. But in South Korea, the US protected them and funded them. Meanwhile in Ghana, the US stripped them of their wealth.

How well off do you think South Korea would be if the US didn't intervene in the Korean War?
Respectfully disagree; Euler's method is absolutely terrible because it's unconditionally unstable; far better is to use something like Leapfrog or velocity Verlet (both of which have 2nd order accuracy and better stability, for exactly the same number of derivative evaluations). Euler integration is essentially always the wrong tool for the job.
> My memory was that the emperor adoptions were more pragmatic than anything, either because the emperor didn't have a son or as insurance against a power struggle caused by a single son dying.

Yeah, generally, but they're just the most famous examples (because emperor); this was standard behaviour for the time if you had something to pass on and didn't have kids. Adopting adult men was really commonplace in Roman society; Roman infant mortality was _astronomical_. The Japanese adoptions mentioned above were pragmatic, too.

Arguably, it's unfortunate that the custom died out for European aristocracy (though it did continue to some extent for normal people). A _huge_ number of wars were caused by failure to produce an heir.
Related question: what's the deal with having a login form that only takes a username, and then only shows a password field after you've pressed enter? I find this very annoying and can't come up with a benefit.
AI reveals new possibilities in matrix multiplication
I originally thought this would be some sort of FPGA that can download a "capability" (special purpose accelerator), probably signed with a device unique ID to require license for each copy, so customers can on demand purchase special accelerators.

I guess I am just not creative enough.
Expecting Galactica to produce truthful academic papers is just about as sensible as expecting to find a significant other among your kitchen appliances. Language models are a way to emulate the writing style of human produced content, only a fool would expect them to reason about the text to any level resembling a scientific standard.

Written language is a doorway to the full extent of human cognition; unless the problem domain is severely constrained (ie "What is the distance to Mars?"), you are very likely to fall into reflexive traps that rapidly devolve into AGI ("I think, therefore I am?").
Not to mention that bleeding out from a arrow or lance wound is probably really fucking miserable and potentially quite slow.
Ask HN: Apart from the governments, who were the earliest investors in Software?
This could be any person, private entity or any industry. I am trying to understand how the feedback loop played out and how software evolved over the decades.
That is just false. The model had a disclaimer on every page that it is not to be trusted and that it hallucinates. Strawmanning is not a nice academic retort
Exactly, email servers like Gmail, Yahoo, hotmail are extremely centralized. Even if the protocol is open and anyone can technically speak on the same level, being big gives way more leverage over where the network is going.

Being centralized is not just being unique, it's being so powerful you get to decide your users' experience, instead of users being in control.
Americans compare politics to sports all the time, and it's bizarre.

I get it - we have only two teams that are really allowed to participate. Decisions all boil down to 'our team wins' or 'their team wins' 99% of the time. Like basketball, or football, or baseball, or tennis, etc.

But the notion that W and Hillary earned their positions on merit, like Steph Curry did, is astounding. That's hilarious that anyone can say that with a straight face. Hillary was the second most detested politician in America, second only to Trump - who she deliberately elevated for that exact reason.
Seven Dimensions – Why Mass is a Vector (and so is everything else)
Lane 8 and all the other artists who publish to his label _This Never Happened_.

Artist radios starting on Bluetech, or any of his albums.

Playlists which match the keywords “Ambient Guitar”

Playlists which match the keywords “Space Ambient”
Meh, get back to me when I can buy horse armor for my CPU.
Apache Software Foundation Announces Apache NuttX as a Top-Level Project
Anecdotally this feels like “D’oh! Who would’ve thought your mind works better when it’s rested and fueled!?”

But it’s nice that someone did a science about it. Now can they someone figure out why as a person this finding is the last thing I think of when going through a day in a cranky fuzzy mood thinking “why the hell am I feeling this way!?”

However, this finding from the abstract caught my eye:

> a breakfast rich in carbohydrate, and a lower blood glucose response following breakfast

Not a nutritionist, but based on all the other stuff I’ve read, how does high carb + low glucose work together? Doesn’t high carb lead to high glucose response?
What were your favorite uses?
UN climate deal: Calamity cash, but no new emissions cuts
> selective information feeding is not a whistleblowing move but political manipulation.

The correct response to this is more whistleblowing, not less.
No, because his photos present no evidence of UFOs whatsoever.
IDK a lot of this is just realizing if you post on a public message board, a lot of people might see it, including the artist. So maybe show some decorum even if you are anonymous.
When creating I like something lively and upbeat.

When debugging slow paced, classical.

Prefer no words as they distract. And will often get stuck in the brain 'never want to give you up, let you down ....' argggg
It's an awful reality, but there is more money to make when targeting rich people than there is money to make products than benefits normal people.

You often see this in startups and business plans and models. Same for whale users.

This says a lot about capitalism.
The current HN post title of "Standard Reference Materials" is accurate and neutral.

Veritasium's title as you mentioned is clickbaity.

Veritasium also admits to changing the title to test viewer responses, as mentioned in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2xHZPH5Sng "Clickbait is Unreasonably Effective" [2021-08-17]. He also explains the problem with titling a video with a term that you would only understand after watching the video.
And then what happens when the user tries to login with the password they just "created". They will get the same error message as before, but be extremely confused since they just "registered" with that password. Not to mention their browser may have prompted and stored the fake registration password, etc.
This is a good title because it succinctly captures the issue: LeCun hyped this work by making wildly inaccurate claims and cherry picking model outputs. Go read his original tweets about the model's capabilities. Read Facebook's own characterization of what this model could achieve.

Not only did they exaggerate and hype, but they also didn't even try to solve some of the most glaring issues. The efforts on toxicity mentioned in their paper aren't even mid. They barely put effort into measuring the issue, and definitely didn't make any attempt to mitigate or correct.

Toxicity isn't really the point. Here's the point. If you can't prevent a model from being overtly toxic, then why should I believe you can give any guarantee at all about the model's output? I shouldn't, because you can't.

Galactica is just another a language model. It can be a useful tool. Facebook and LeCun oversold its capabilities and downplayed its issues. If they had just been honest and humble, things would've probably gone very differently.

In some sense, this is good news. The deep learning community -- and generative model work in particular -- is getting a much-needed helping of humble pie.

Hopefully we can continue publishing and hosting models without succumbing to moral panic. But the first step toward that goal is for scientists to be honest about the capabilities and limitations of their models.

----

My account is new so I am rate limited and unable to reply to replies. My response to the general vibes of replies is therefore added to the above post as an edit. Sorry.

Response about toxicitiy:

It's a proxy that they say they care about. I can stop there, but I'll also point out: it's not just "being nice", it's also stuff like overt defense of genocide, instructions for making bombs, etc. These are lines that no company wants their model to cross, and reasonably so. If you can't even protect Meta enough to keep the model online for more than a day or two, then why should I believe you can give any guarantee at all about the model's output in my use case? (And, again, they can't. It's a huge problem with LLLMs)

Response about taking the model down:

I'm not at FB/Meta, but I think I know what happened here.

In the best case, Meta was spending a lot of valuable zero-sum resources (top of the line GPUs) hosting the model. In the worst case they were setting a small fortune on fire at a cloud provider. Even at the largest companies with the most compute, there is internal competition and rationing for the types of GPUs you would need to host a Galactica-sized model. Especially in prototype phase.

An executive decided they would rather pull the plug on model hosting than spend zero-sum resources on a public relations snafu with no clear path to revenue. It was a business decision. The criticism of Galactica and especially the messaging around it was totally fair. The business decision was rational. Welcome to private sector R&D; it works a little different from your academic lab for better and for worse.
Sparrks
Sparrks is an agile business coaching solution that allows for effortless leadership capacity improvements.
Who is blocking these? Paranoid corporates?
Given that that domain was registered in 2008, they probably have just been using this one for so long that it's not worth the hassle to switch now that they have the TLD.
You are 100% right. The book just laid out exactly what you are saying.

Computers just made the enforcement easier and with less opportunities to break out of it - for example, a sympathetic public servant no longer has the power to make exceptions since "the computer won't allow it."
I'm not sure what you mean by "pull-based", but you can make the whole thing single-threaded with `#[tokio::main(flavor = "current_thread")]`

See https://docs.rs/tokio/latest/tokio/attr.main.html
I just want to point out that the border between Northern Ireland and The Republic is in a weird state of legal flux, being sometimes in the sea, sometimes hard, soft, semi-soft, and being a source of violent tension for generations. If you actually go there today you'll often notice nothing at all, but there have been all sorts of plans about what will finally happen once we "get Brexit done".
Wow, really nice, relaxing. Don’t bloat it, sometimes simple and sweet is a winner. Mobile app version would be helpful.
pretty much all peripheral software (RGB control, anything customization) is Windows-first or Windows-only
Thanks for sharing your experience! It's a very interesting point about how you adapt your play based on the preconception about how computers play. The AI isn't programmed to blunder per se, it's more that I have tried to emulate a human intuition & thinking process – which is prone to blunders. So it never intentionally makes a mistake to test you, or to even the game out, it just tries to emulate your level of play.
Here's what I (a person with a fairly superficial understanding of how AI works, for context) can't understand - why wouldn't it have been trivial to prevent the kinds of issues that arose by just training the thing to only pull information from scientific papers/literature, and when a question arose on a topic that didn't have information in those places just say "we can't find enough information about that topic"?

It seems like it was good at structuring the writing, both at the article and sentence levels, and for valid prompts it produced accurate responses. But if you entered "write a wiki article about the Alien vs. Predator hypothesis," it would structure it like a wiki article about a scientific topic but just put random AVP stuff it found on the internet into that structure. Why couldn't they just explicitly define which sources are appropriate to pull information from? That seems easier to me than building the actual product they made (but again, I am a layman here).
Not to mention the advent or heavily armored pike formations that shrugged off arrows. Muskets we’re after som trial na error able to punch through the best plate armor.
Coincidentally, last night I started porting an actix-web project to Axum. In my very brief experience, I have found Axum (0.6.0-rc5) to be more ergonomic compared to actix-web. However, I haven't rewritten all the existing features yet so my opinion could change in a few days.
> I did see the docs about adding this extra macro crate for error messages but it seemed like a bit of a red flag that the framework was going against the grain of the language.

Is it really going against the grain of the language? Or really that Rust still has issues with error messages on complex / deep types and that should be reported / fixed?

Because leveraging the type system seems to be pretty in-line with normal Rust ideals, and Send issues is a load-bearing type error of the concurrency system.
> Did people know there was such a think called "poverty" before

Diogenes the Cinic 2400 years ago reportedly lamented hunger (and the absence of shortcuts to curb it, NSFW). That is the poverty contextual to the article.
Most of those are trying to track me around the net for their own purposes. I'm not volunteering any extra information for them to profile me with. No thanks.
> Even if you use DNS-over-HTTPS/TLS, you don't know if your DNS provider is in cahoots with the eavesdropper. You have to trust someone

but in this case, couldn't you just use an offshore dns provider that's in a jurisdiction that won't cooperate with judicial system? (assuming here adversary is getting sued by copyright holder, not govt agency)
> My website is hosted off a Hetzner dedicated server

> also stores all of my random files I've accumulated over the years

> live backup of some very important files in case my house gets destroyed.

You should seriously consider moving your backups off your web server...
OTOH, if all I need is a powerful CPU and I have no use for any of the accelerators right now, I can pay a lower price than I would be able to, without Intel needing to make a different part for me.

For Intel, it also helps to fine tune the product lineup by getting more detailed usage information.
You can? Imperative, strong type system (no null, adts), reasonably fast, compiles to a single binary. I'm genuinely interested.