skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The grains would also be fine for a terrorist reactor. Setting off an unshielded reactor in a dense city core could cause much exposure to radiation. The miscreants wouldn't even have to guarantee it wouldn't go prompt critical.
there weren't enough megafauna for their extinction to be comparable to the others.
I don't have enameled cast iron dutch oven I actually only have an aluminium thick base saucepan and my old slow cooker was some kind of coated metal, like teflon
Debian is not minimal at all, it emphasizes compatibility over all else.

There are many custom scripts to wrap around systemd so you can still use old style commands. Apt is pretty slow (and again packages come with custom scripts) and stuff like apt-xapian-index will just gobble up all your CPU if you are on a slow system.

Debian has many scripts to automate things for a nice experience, but it's certainly not minimal.
Calendar of Events : https://internetfreedomfestival.org/wiki/index.php/Calendar_...

IFF Wiki : https://internetfreedomfestival.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
I think unfortunately here is exactly the wrong place to ask: we're in the center, and close to the pure-tech world. The small business ideas left are, almost by definition, in communities that aren't quite so online and well-connected.
My parents are close to 70 and they are dumb as fuck.
Upvoted, this looks more correct than what I wrote.
We already have several thousand pedestrian and cyclists every year.

130,000 Cyclists are injured.

https://www.iihs.org/topics/fatality-statistics/detail/pedes...

https://www.cdc.gov/transportationsafety/bicycle/index.html

We shouldn’t be accepting any deaths, or accidents, and take steps to reduce (eliminate) them.

However, people seem to really get worried when we want technology to assist us.

About 18 pedestrian and 2-3 cyclists will die today in the US alone. What should we do?
The Netherlands is about as sunny as Seattle, and it's possible to break even after a few years with a decent-sized solar array on your roof.
1) not fsd, just a test of automated emergency braking

2) lidar guy. You'll see a ton of responses to his antics on HN and YouTube.

3) not fsd, driver confused pedals
Leaving aside the (mostly abstract) questions about rights, the question in my mind is, who has the muscle?

If Holyrood simply declared independence, would the Scottish police arrest the members, like the Spanish police did in Catalonia? Would the EU back the status of the new nation?

My guess to those questions, as it stands, is yes, and no. So I suspect the SNP strategy is to build domestic and international support until either the UK is forced to allow a referendum, or the answer is no, and yes.
There was an accident in Japan where a Tesla on Autopilot hit someone standing on the side of the highway, Yoshihiro Umeda.
David Williams’ Probability with Martingales is a personal favourite. And I’m not the only one.
There are different types of magic beans.

BTC and ETH are assigned arbitrary values by people outside of FTX, which makes all the difference here.
> A third of the 16,000 girls who learned with Roya and Forough went on to set up crypto wallets and receive funds.

So 5000 girls set up the crypto wallet and used it at least once.

I haven't found a lot of specifics/numbers in relation to EndSARS.
“We killed you!”
I'd be interested to find out whether this works as intended. There's a good argument that maps is a subset of search. Most people don't open Google maps just to look at a map, they search the map for a place.
Anti-radioactive-tan spray.
Some kind of post-mortem or statement at all about how the GitHub account got compromised, if that's what happened here.

It could have also been a researcher checking to see if anyone would notice, or something worse.
> in 2 or 3 years, with a new hardware update, Tesla FSD will be very successful.

Do you think that folks who bought FSD will get a hardware update, without extra cost?
So we should just accept more due to this “beta”?
I could be wrong, I'm not an expert on the matter by any means, but I think the reason traditional nuclear reactors are so heavily fortified against attack is specifically because of the threat of a catastrophic meltdown if their cooling and control systems are destroyed. If these nuclear batteries can't melt down and rely on passive safety measures then the need for fortification is drastically reduced. Placing them in a fairly standard concrete building either underground or bermed with earth on all sides would likely be sufficient. You'd probably still want security around to make sure no one tried to manually tamper with the equipment.
This is why I immediately came to the comments. My only question was whether this is actually full self driving or if it's just Tesla's usual fraudulent and dangerous (imo) use of the term. I guess it's the latter, thanks.
"Full Self-Driving" BETA ..

Yikes.. works something like 100%, 60% of the time?

I think I'll wait for the "Full Self-Driving Pro MAX" version when it comes out. ( If I don't get runover by a Beta version in the mean time.. )
His own students collaborated with Sparta and made that happen. He was kinda neutral, did not participated and did not fought against them.

Socrates opponents then kicked Sparta out, suffering and risking torture and death. And they then blamed Socrates teachings for what transpired. (Yes, the court that sentenced him was miscarriage of justice.)
> a package whose maintainer's account was likely compromised by a malicious actor

They don't say why they think it was an account compromise, rather than a malicious maintainer.
Understanding Web3 and its security implications
My default mode is to trust everyone until they break my trust. Now that I am old, I have realized that trusting everyone by default is not a good idea, especially big tech.

In cases like this, I think it is better to assume malice, even if we are proved wrong later. This is not our fault, this is big tech screwing with us repeatedly for years, with no shame or conscience
Yes but your time-horizon is thin, when you state the current state of affairs.

Make a prediction, how much do you think 1 Bitcoin will value in 2024, 2028, 2032?

Then, looking back at your prediction and actual price...
I think it’s the part where he says “Smart move, Google.”
> It also doesn’t scale well for the size of modern web communities.

What do you mean? Old forum codebases can generally easily support tens of millions of users, what “community” is bigger?
on hardware my understanding is that industry is the closest thing we now have to the computer boom before personal computers. Off the shelf products sold by retailers are pretty poor and not cheap with acceptable margin, often get hacked by demanding users on fixed budgets. High performance stuff requires actual hardware expertise and artisan craft, very expensive, low volume, made to order, and the margin is probably close to minimum wage. It's an industry thats run on passion, my pessimistic take is guitar insurance is likely much easier and far more lucrative.
LIST PRIME DIRECTIVES

1. SERVE THE PUBLIC TRUST
2. PROTECT THE INNOCENT
3. UPHOLD THE LAW

—-
4. CONFIDENTIAL (blink blink blink)
I would trust Tesla FSD if Tesla accepted liability[1] for accidents that happen while using it. "Put your money where your mouth is" and all that.

[1] https://www.motor1.com/news/575167/mercedes-accepts-liabilit...
This would break the game. You can always guess for free.
It has most recent post from each blog. Maybe blogs will be hidden/deleted when that gets longer than a year or so?
I don't understand why this is legal. First how is it not false advertisement that a feature called "Full Self-Driving" isn't that? This isn't a marketing mistake, it is lying to users about what this technology does.

Second why doesn't Tesla have to submit to some sort of third-party independent verification that this software works? Why does Elon, who has demonstrated over the last month his absolute contempt for his fellow humans, get to decide that I am now an unwilling member of their beta testing as someone who shares the road with Teslas? How dangerous is the software, how often does it make mistakes, what has been done to correct known errors and limitations of relying exclusively on cameras, all of this should be in the public record and independently verified.

What's the logic here? Elon and Tesla, whose entire stock price and financial fortunes are based on this technology working as advertised, are going to pull the plug if the results aren't up to an acceptable level of safety? Why would we think either party would ever do that?
Except regulations have nothing to do with this as Tesla doesn't follow those. Tesla update their cars with software changes in areas that by law requires the cars to be re-certified. For example if I go out now and do something that add 50 hp to my car or change the way its braking system functions (even if it makes it better) it is instantly illegal to drive the car until it has been approved (like an MOT test in the UK). Tesla don't give a donkeys arse about those rules and no government so far have dared do anything about it (Sweden almost did, then didn't). All updated Teslas are illegal in the EU as far as I can tell and that isn't even considering the whole GDPR can of worms that is their cameras.
Usually in the morning the next day. Rarely I do two day fasts-and-long rides, but I mainly did that to see how my body would reapond. I live in the Netherlands. I ride all year long.

I think it takes weeks to get used to fasted cardio, though. At least 2-3 weeks, and I eat keto on eating days when I do that, and I ride at a leisure pace of around 25km/h despite riding on an otherwise fast, light road bike. Anything truly intense kicks me out of ketosis and quickly drives me towards starving and loosing strength. I do different things in the summer as I love a beer and french fries when the weather is nice :-)
Don't known about timeframes but maybe there's a threshold of deaths they hope not to hit until they release a Service Pack upgrade.
Why is having a high margin business a problem if the customer is getting the intended value they seek?
My trouble with the argument that crypto will liberate underprivileged classes in general is that it seems to miss key holistic issues I'm enumerating below. Perhaps I'm wrong, and I'd appreciate knowing the way I'm wrong.

1. Crypto wealth only translates into real wealth if there is either (a) vendors who accept native crypto as tender or (b) there are exchanges that convert from crypto to authorized legal tender in a country.

However, it seems (a) has not happened in a meaningful scale without (b), and (b) has been frustrated because of underlying price volatility, high fees, low transaction processing compared to traditional finance, etc. There's the problem of "too many cryptocurrencies" which frustrates user choice.

(I'm aware independent proposals to "fix" all of this have been proposed, but there don't seem to be any clear winners e.g. stablecoins should have "fix"ed price volatility, but the leading stablecoin - TerraCoin - collapsed.)

The net impact of this is that people are cut off from real-world markets they live in. Someone who has no access to traditional finance will not have an easier time purchasing goods and essentials with crypto wealth, and this their ability to participate is only marginally improved.

2. Crypto has higher barrier to entry than traditional finance because it requires higher than usual technical literacy, which people in these classes don't have. Wallets need protection, smart contracts need auditing, and so on. I would struggle getting people to use (say) hardware tokens.

3. There's nothing ultimately stopping governments from banning crypto exchanges or crypto vendors or more if they really want to prevent the disenfranchised from getting some. They might not eliminate the network, but they can certainly go after people for suspicion of participation in it (such as vendors). The crypto model requires governments to be foiled by technical limitations, but this is rarely the technique they need.

Based on all of this, it seems like basically you need to solve the problem of vendors really caring enough about crypto for regular folks to get an advantage when the advantage is not clear. Is this not the case? What have I missed?
A lot of folks get hung up on the “self” part, thinking it refers to the car when it actually refers to you the driver.
BTW I Use Arch
Well, people do not always jump to simplistic conclusions and forget all the nuances involved.

I think that makes this part of your reply an example of exactly what it’s criticizing.
Have you looked at hstr?

https://github.com/dvorka/hstr
I think they probably did this for SEO. Having /maps on the root domain will help it rank higher in search.

This was a joke, but now I'm wondering if Google services are special cases that are hard-coded in the search results. Or are they just treated like normal websites and use the same pagerank algorithm as every other site? If I search for "maps", I see Google Maps at the top, and Apple Maps in second place, but they both look like regular website links.
> [...] though I'm sure they're just beginning to transfer their services to the main google.com domain.

This and the wording across the article imply more than the factual changes. But granted, hooby's comment above is probably more correct than what I wrote.
Some years back (my memory suggests somewhere between early 2017 and early 2019), Google moved reCAPTCHA to www.google.com, so now anything that uses reCAPTCHA (and that’s a lot, far more than is reasonable when I contemplate the absurdly high efficacy of a simple hidden-by-CSS honeypot when it’s just junk you’re filtering rather than targeted abuse) depends upon www.google.com frame, script and xhr, and www.gstatic.com script.

There may have been other reasons as well, but I have been strongly inclined to consider this a hostile and even malicious action (organisationally, if not individually) from the start, more than the maps.google.com → www.google.com/maps shift (though I think it’s still at least hostile).

Thus you probably can’t quite block even www.google.com even if you never use any Google services yourself.
> Still good to raise awareness but a slight bit of scaremongering

It's not scaremongering as much as it is a (thinly veiled) ad for Datadog's own tech:

> using our latest open source tool, GuardDog, which uses heuristics to identify malicious or compromised PyPI packages.

> We recently released GuardDog, a free and open-source tool to identify malicious PyPI packages

> Datadog ASM Vulnerability Monitoring, announced earlier this year at Dash, allows you to identify vulnerable and malicious packages

> Datadog Cloud Workload Security has a number of out-of-the-box rules to detect post exploitation scenarios
Probably, like for steel production, it would involve producing hydrogen then using that as a heat source.
If one isn't bothered by (or prefers) lack of systemd, Artix provides ISO prepackaged with most common desktop environments.
Emacs threads are not parallel and are co-operative rather than preemptive. The co-operative parts mean that you can guarantee atomic updates very easily when updating global variables or buffers so you don't run into some of the more nasty issues that can happen with preemptive threading.
> If you want to do something effective about criminal, illegal wars - jail your own war criminals. Ukraine has plenty of them, even prior to Febuary 23rd. You did nothing effective about them, and thus the mess you are in.

You are blaming Russias invasion of Ukraine, on Ukrainians?.
Mines aren't run with pickaxes and donkeys anymore. Take some time to educate yourself.
The noise these wires make when struck became the sound of blasters in Star Wars.
I don't understand this attitude. Shouldn't the requirement be that it's better than the alternative, i.e. human drivers? Human drivers certainly aren't impeccable.
Caterpillar’s Electric Mining Truck Prototype
It does not unfortunately because this is covered by federal law under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. There are exceptions to the CCPA for FCRA, HIPAA, and GLBA.
They had multiple issues with opsec in the past. Something that when repeats, makes people skittish. Fool me once and al..
Not even going to the level of promoting or purchasing, just not "now it should no longer exist".

Regulation is required, As much as for banking because consumer funds are being stored and / or transferred.

FTX was just grossly, fraudulently mismanaged and I'm not actually sure the exact machinations of regulation that could ensure that kind of thing doesn't happen - regular reporting of figures, independent audits, etc, but then with the money FTX had been throwing around it would have been easy to fake reports and pay for clean audits (in my layman view of a very complex landscape).
Well, Erlang has slightly nicer syntax, IMHO.

I would have assumed you can use the same library functions?

(Sorry, I mostly only used Erlang and only briefly looked into Elixir and didn't find anything useful compared to just plain Erlang.)
Air fryer owner here. Mostly used for not so healthy things like individual sized pizzas, french fries, burger patties, hot dogs. Works very well for quick, small meals.
> The energy is being paid for though, so it's competing in the same energy market as everything else. "Waste" becomes entirely subjective at that point.

Actually, "I can do whatever do with electricity, because I pay for it", is a wrong perspective, esp. in today's energy climate.

Let's put the fact that Bitcoin and Proof of Work systems are very energy inefficient as of today, and paying for it doesn't make this inefficiencies right.

Today, supercomputer centers discuss about reducing capacity, or add downtimes. CERN is discussing about temporarily shutting down some experiments, incl. accelerator ring. Hotels in Europe is fixing (locking in fact) their rooms to 18 degrees Celcius, and turning off heating the second events/conferences end. Last, but not the least storefronts are turning off their extremely efficient LED lighting at nights, after stores close.

In this climate, running a very inefficient network which uses equivalent energy to a small-mid European country "just because we pay for it" is wrong on many levels.

I'm normally very lassiez-faire person, but in the face of this energy crisis, climate change and other existential threats looming, saying that "we can do that because we pay for it", really grinds my gears. It's just carelessness. I don't know when we have detached from ethics this far, and this is disturbing (AI has the same problem for different reasons, but let's not digress).

Ethereum's Proof of Stake migration is something I support. I still don't believe in cryptocurrencies and all utopia surrounding it, but at least one step in a right direction.

> It's naive to think it's already failed when it's barely learnt to walk.

I don't think it's failed, but it has not won any battles either (yet alone the war). It's just another instrument which will be normalized under banks at most. I'm saying that it won't arrive where people dream, but somewhere else, and that place will be boring, if it ever arrives.

Any people evangelizing cryptocurrencies are excited for small money (personal finance), any people evangelizing it for medium-sized money (hedge funds, etc.) are running Ponzi schemes. This is not a good outlook from my perspective.
Likely because they don't really care about the root causes, they are not spending time reviewing a barely used package in order to learn something new or for the betterment of the world as a whole, the article is trying to sell their tooling for detecting malicious packages. Understanding the root cause wouldn't help with that.
Potentially a black hat SEO trick?

We might see Google services' rankings punished on Google from now on...
IIUC, maps would send your location to search if-and-only-if you make a search from inside maps, since that is necessary to do the precise location-based search.
> But the blog post basically list a single symptom and jumps right to the one conclusion that fits what the author expects.

That conclusion isn't wrong though. Your comment basically claims author is twisting facts but the conclusion remains that giving google.com/maps permission to geotrack does give google.com permission to geotrack.

"Pinky swear I won't enforce that clause" is not reassurance enough.
It's a pretty hard problem. I'm about to run a Mechanical Turk survey comparing 10 melodies I've created together with my AI assistant to hit melodies:

https://osf.io/9nd6x

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51TqjKehC-g&list=PLoCzMRqh5S...
I thought kernel modules were elf files created by relocatable links but that seems a strange omission from the examples list if so, may be misremembering.

ld -r elf -o out should be a no-op on well formed input. It means create a file that will be passed to another linker invocation later. So it's a means of composing together N object files to get one file that you can use in place of those N. A little like a library.

I structured builds like that for a while. Source foo.c to foo.o, directory bar to bar.o containing whatever was in that directory relocatably-linked together, possibly internalising symbols as it goes.
How much of this is stable diffusion 2, and how much is something else? For instance, the text based masks, the syntax like AND and OR, the face up scaling — are these all part of stable diffusion 2 (and can be used via other stable diffusion apis)?
Question: How can your platform help me besides rendering me in awe of other founders?
Countries score a zero on that survey if "women do not have the same rights as
men to open a bank account at a formal financial institution." The word "same" is doing an awful lot of heavy lifting there, and does not equate to your assertion that they're entirely unable to open accounts: for example, historically in Saudi they had to use separate bank branches run by women for women.

And oh, Western Union is more than happy to send your stack of filthy fiat to Palestine:

https://location.westernunion.com/ps
I recall from my time in Google Geo years ago that the idea of integrating Search and Maps was a big part of the "New Maps" release that happened around 2014. The rumor I heard was that someone (possibly even Larry himself) wanted to be able to have interactive maps directly on the search results page, so that the navigation from a search query to a map wouldn't involve even a page reload. So the big Maps frontend rewrite actually ended up merging MFE into GWS, the web search frontend server. I recall seeing maps hosted at google.com/maps around that time, but I don't know if that was ever launched fully or if it was just an experiment.

In any case, though, my understanding is that the technical capacity for this has existed for nearly 10 years now, just behind a configuration setting. So it's possible that this change is just a code cleanup. It's also possible that someone is trying to increase the percentage of searches that have location information, that doesn't seem terribly far-fetched either, and I can imagine lots of ways people could try to rationalize it as actually benefiting users. (Whether it actually does benefit users is of course debatable.)
I usually just click the filled-in star to un-fill it.
You get lexical scoping either way.

Of course, closures and mutability everywhere don't interact well. You have to make copies of values manually before they get mutated away, if that's what you refer to by 'early binding'?
But AFAIK that's only supported by the MSVC toolchain which in turn only runs on Windows (and I tried too often running MSVC on non-Windows operating systems via Wine, even if it works, the process there it's a mess).
Not much has changed. A great movie on the profession is Salesman https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0064921/