skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's not a false positive because it's broken, though. It's a false positive because it's working as intended and the host is simply violating the rules. It's weird that a site would opt-in to a feature like this, use it incorrectly, and then when the browser correctly rejects it, you would get mad at the browser. Nobody was actually forced to use HSTS here, and there's also no good reason for a TLS certificate to be expired either; in production, this is an incident no matter what.

The browser really isn't treating you as stupid, it's telling you "this is a serious security issue, if you really want to bypass this, you're on your own." You absolutely can, using flags in chromium or config in Firefox, or sometimes by clearing the HSTS cache in either. The benefit of this is that it ensures users who don't know better, the majority, don't stumble into an attack in the most critical situations, and it as well makes it significantly harder for developers and malicious attackers alike to try to convince end users to wrongly bypass security features, a problem that plagued early web browsers which had much worse UX around TLS. Even though it can be annoying, it's helpful to all of us, because the security posture of those around you naturally impact your own security posture, too.

This is all especially reasonable because HSTS is opt-in from the host's perspective. You're supposed to use it when you'd absolutely rather have false positives than not catch an attack.

This particular point doesn't have much to do with old technology, but I honestly don't think most developers set out to just break old tech. I agree that it is a shame the degree of churn we go through, but even if you have a super valid reason to absolutely need to use old technology, it's still not a good argument for the rest of the world to hold off on improving security, privacy and performance by holding back TLS upgrades or continuing to include and debug polyfills for all of eternity. If you really absolutely can't make TLS work for you, nothing is stopping you from running an SSL stripping proxy in the middle. Works pretty well for me.

Hopefully in the future the churn of technology will slow down and computers will last longer, but we're literally still near the beginning of the computing revolution, and the computers from 20 years ago are probably a much more enormous delta from today than the computers 20 years from today will be. (And even if a breakthrough proves this untrue, it still seems unlikely that today's boxes will become useless, with how much compute they pack.) And yet despite that, Linux is still dutifully supporting processors as old as 486, even though it's not really that important to be running the latest kernel on a machine that old. That's pretty good, and even if browser updates are difficult on machines that old, I have little doubt that some people will be maintaining them all the way to the 2038 problem where it will get much harder.
> EA is reskinned utilitarianism, which folks have repeated pointed out.

Well then I respectfully argue you're misinformed, or simply reading a small subset that is utilitarian. I don't know a single utilitarian in the EA circles I'm in. Central EA-orgs define themselves as not utilitarian. There's many sources arguing you give what you can afford while a utilitarian approach would be to give beyond that if you can save more lives. SBF would be championed as a hero, not a villain, for his ponzi scheme. No money would be going to animal welfare or modern healthcare worries because longtermism would have won the argument. There'd be more than one case of someone using EA to cause harm like robbing a bank. There'd be popular EA speakers calling themselves utilitarian in public. There'd be a single post arguing the ends justify the means from a central EA organisation.

Etc...

EA is very simply the idea that one should check the efficiency of charities and try get the best bang for their dollar. That is it.

Maybe it'd help to understand your idea of what EA and Utilitarianism actually are? Because there's a disconnect somewhere between us. And utilitarianism is a huge subject so perhaps your thinking of a particular kind that is different to my (and many EA's) understanding of the topic.
I have concluded that becoming an indie hacker is a more suitable path for me.

(After working on a funded startup full-time as a cofounder.)
You can't have a curious conversation when you've committed yourself to not understanding the points other people are making.
Self-hosting Q: Which VPS would/have you use(d) in a country like Iceland or Sweden?
Webb telescope shows exoplanet atmosphere as never seen before
BigBang – deploy DoD hardened and approved packages on Kubernetes
With a 2.5% fee to Visa
> I am doubtful that volunteers can provide the level of moderation needed in a full scale social network.

They don’t have to. Unlike Twitter, where sports Twitter and investing Twitter, are both just Twitter, Sports Mastadon is simply a different social network than Investing Mastadon.

The mental model of a different subgroups within the same platform is simply the wrong mental model.
Very rare for an investor to want a founder they invest in to be constantly worrying about money. Very good signal you shouldn’t be working with them if they don’t get that.
I'll tell you how, and it isn't just 'don't do it'. It is a slow, organic, and patient process. This comes with hidden advantages such as being able to quickly and quietly pivot as you learn.
It isn't really the technology that they need. It would definitely be great to have a lighter headset, to have enough computing power to overlay 3D structures onto the existing world, to be all to do full body tracking with an inside-out system, etc, but those things are actually limited to things that you can't really fast track (chip production improvements are moore's law and battery tech is pretty much at a roadblock).

What they need is a 'killer app'. The PC would never have gotten on to a desktop if it weren't for spreadsheets and word processing, and the internet wouldn't have become ubiquitous if it weren't for the web. The metaverse currently has nothing to motivate normal people to want to strap on a headset to use it for more than a few minutes at a time to play a game or maybe watch a movie, currently, so Meta is struggling to find a compelling consumer appeal. Most people who get a Quest end up sticking in their closet after playing with it for a few weeks.
I don't know if it's device specific but I use "Hey Siri, turn on the overhead lights and the floor lamp" for example all the time. I have a HomePod though.
that would be cool. i've been switching to clover as i really don't like maintaining a lawn, and recent droughts have been awful.
but only because the local service in this example is not prepared to accept the websocket connection, the teamviewer client would be able to do this to enable some functions on the teamviewer website if a instance is running
I do not think this is convincing in any way. And I very much dislike people assigning cynical motivations for the moral preferences of others.

Any activity can be described this way. "Working in a soup kitchen?" "I bet you are doing this because it makes you feel superior to all the others who do not volunteer, right? And also, you feel less guilty seeing homeless people now, after all you are already doing something, so there is no reason to feel obligated to them aswell".

I am sure that there are many entirely sincere EA enthusiasts, wanting nothing more than see their money be used to better the lives of others. Spending time organizing, fundraising, optimizing charity, doing outreach, some of it might even be "hard work", done gladly without receiving any praise or compensation.
On the other hand a friend of mine is regularly getting up at 2am to drag the injured, freezing, decrepit and mentally ill into a place where they can get some semblance of help. To me it is clear who is actually more deserving of respect and who does more to improve the lives of people.

If everything you have is money, all problem look like they are solved by spending.
I disabled the swap in Windows, because I have 32G RAM (and why put unnecessary wear on the SSD). And now it runs out of memory while half the RAM is empty.

A marvelous operating system.

But yeah, at least I saw the warning fast, with the swap file it first came to a sudden halt, and after a lot of time it might have shown the alert.
5% of the US workforce seems like a lot! And about 10% of the US male workforce, depending on which source number you use. That is a considerable figure in my opinion. And that's only the 25-54 year olds!
If you get a high paying job you are very likely not looking rationally at the harm done by your job.

My understanding of ETG is that people have the goal to earn as much money as possible so they can donate more. But if you take the idea of rationally deciding how to do most god, of course you have to balance the good you do with your donations against the bad you do in your job. And you are the worst person to evaluate that rationally.
Ha I hear this a lot but the alternatives I have seen used are frankly just as terrible. I much prefer Confluence to a hidden web of Google docs.
Incorrect. Without going into all the nitty gritty, even a lot of FAANG companies have explicit moonlighting policies that are fairly permissible.

At the one I am at now, you can get a written sign off from legal before you even start your side project, where they agree that all rights to the side project belong to you. You have to apply for each project individually, but the form is online, just a few fields, and is commonly approved (as long as it isnt a legitimate conflict of interest). I don't mind the process, because each time it nets me an official signed paper that explicitly states that my employer has no rights to my side project.
I read MacAskill's What We Owe The Future - it's a great book, and a compelling argument. I recommend you read it.

What I suspect might be happening is that "do gooders" (as research has shown) are often attacked by others because those that do good are a "threat" to the status quo. Rather than living your life as you do, when you encounter a vegetarian, you are reminded that your meat consumption causes suffering in animals. When you encounter an EA (Effective Altruist) giving 10% of their income to charity, you are reminded about how you too could do the same but are choosing not to. So for many people, it is easier to find some shred of hypocrisy or fault in those doing the good and thus have the clean conscience to ignore the good aims.
Seriously? It is pretty easy to imagine function which has limited and low combinations count

Enums, bools, etc.

>can result in your test taking a significant amount of time - enough that you wouldn't want to run it very often.

It is irrelevant in theoretical discussions like this
Didn’t Firefox just ship a big RAM improvement update (105)?
Hmm, not really in the same way -- to do this with linker scripts you would need to rename some of the symbols in the library being consumed.

What you can use, to a limited extent, is dlmopen().

Shared objects in Linux are just really late linked static objects, with fix-ups (hence PIC requirements).

In macOS and Windows, there are heirarchies.
This is only situationally true, both in terms of employment contract and jurisdiction.

Rule #1: don't listen to sweeping statements about law on HN.
muslim women are not allowed with burqa in France
Also not to forget it's very common to have a thin coat of plaster on top of any drywall.

To be honest, I'm not sure why we do this, but it makes for a far more durable finish than just drywall.
don't forget the standards-friendly subset, SFCGAL
Become a MAANG employee. (Just don't look at stock prices or RSUs.)
One Way to Stop the Social Spread of Disinformation
Interesting!

Didn't know that. I just read that some people here were like "I really wanna try Urbit".
U.S. Centcom Reveals New Details on Iranian Drone Attack on Tanker
Can you educate on why the existence of wife and children is such a burden? Is it social committments? Children don't take up 8+ hours a day after 1yro+ And wives... get one that understands stuff like this?

I ask because I know multiple talented people using this as an excuse to not use their abilities as they claim they want to.

My ignorant guess would be people these days think you need to spend a ton of time with your family because other people blame their problems on absent parents? That's why I'm asking to be educated so I can be less ignorant about the burden of parents. Naively, if I had a kid (not that I plan to, don't worry lol) I wouldn't care about spending time, just feed, clean and transport, not that much worse than pets burdenwise. I would expect kids and spouses to understand the nature of the real world (when they grow older for kids).
A "binding" treaty where the terms of the treaty are supposedly binding, but, like on the real world stage, the only penalties for breaking them is a lowered trust from all the other countries/players, sounds fine.

A binding treaty where if you break them someone will say "that's against the rules of the game, and the rest of us will stop playing if you don't comply" sounds terrible.
You're going to need to expand more, because you're ultimately still implying some sort of new right to control your personal data compared to how things are.

"Market activity" occurs at the level of abstraction above the foundation of what ownership is defined as. Define ownership wrong, and it turns into just another sleight of hand where you've theoretically got rights, but in practice it's impractical to extract yourself and assert them in a meaningful sense.

Defining rights properly is what my comment was focused on. After that is done, you can build whatever system you like for companies to encourage users to allow the use of their personal data.
My startup CEO takes home like $500k. lol!
I’m curious, do you have kids?

My perspective changed when I had kids. And I had kids close together, Matter than friends to boot.

Mostly I realized how’s much time I was wasting to that point in life and I stopped.

It’s perfectly possible to do a startup at any age. Know many people who do and have.

Kids were a perfect prioritization and decision aid in my case. It makes you perfectly serious about doing what needs to be done. Innovation can happen just fine with constraints.

Leading up to it if you don’t have good adult habits and skills you probably some be a lasting successful entrepreneur anyways.

Doing a startup is a lot like being responsible for a baby. Some things need to be done whether you like them or not. Status aren’t just about working on the fun parts.

Getting it right also means making sure you are the kind of example you want to be for them to take their own shots. Sacrificing parents can better a sense of sacrifice in kids and it might be a cycle someone is looking to break.

Would there be more time before kids? Sure. But hard to find people in their 20s a made the most of their time beyond chasing every shiny thing. Generally our standards for how we spend our time are lost in our 20s and improves as we become more well rounded.

You only start getting good and dangerous in your 30s and 40s. It’s why so many vcs are older, they buy the years of young people and are ok if it goes no where.

If you don’t want to be a statistic, you can look at bootstrapping smaller and then growing. There are funds like tinyseed and others that specialize in it.

In your CV 30s you probably have insight in an industry need that you could bang out and have making money per easily to transfer to the next thing. HN might not be the place for this kind of thought especially if it’s orthogonal to the vc echo chamber that attracts a following and needs a decade to see in balance with other options.

If success is freedom of time, attention and resources where you want to put them, the path of startups as you are implying (likely funded) might not be compatible with you.

Todays the youngest you’ll ever be. If not now, then when?
E. W. Dijkstra constructed a similar argument to argue that numbering should start at 0 https://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/transcriptions/EWD08xx/E...
Personally, my problem with trying to use Vim keybindings in VS Code is not about the motions of moving around/editing the code itself, but everything else. You end up in plenty of situations where you have to resolve using the mouse because you ended up on some sub-page or whatever, where you either need to resolve using the mouse or keep pressing Tab until you get to where you want to go.

Installing plugins is one good example of this, where even if you use a Vim plugin (or this, it seems), you still need to resolve to using the mouse/Tabbing to actually install the plugin itself.

While with Neo/Vim itself, you never need to reach for the mouse, because the entire thing, not just the editing/writing, is meant to facilitate keyboard-only usage.
US treasury department regulations prohibit US companies from working with people and companies in Russian-controlled parts of Ukraine. Unfortunately, IP geolocation is accurate only to the country level, so US companies have no choice but to block the entire country to comply with regs.
Ah yeah, the Office Heroics boss. "Here is a random date for no reason, GO!"
We have a fundamental disagreement. I don't agree that ad personalization and data collection is similar (in any way) to selling addictive drugs and substances that directly cause physical harm.

You implying that I support it is silly. Please don't do that. I'm against spying tech, and lets not polarize the discussion.
It’s always interesting to watch people wantonly spin up new definitions of things as quick as you could deploy a Docker container to justify their queer and inhumane philosophies.
This. My son is only 4 months old and between all the naps and feeding, it's maybe only a few hours of actual time actively spent doing things with him. But I do have the luxury of being home all day so I work during his downtime.
Kudos! Long time user here! Love 1password.
When you are putting all your metaphorical eggs on one FTX baskets by relying on SBF to run your high profile programs, I would say you should ask hard questions or diversify. Then again, my risk assessment is different from EAs, which is why I propose triple checking their math.
1644 – The Largest Coin
They do make good laptops though? Look, let's not dive into the whole ARM vs x86 thing, it's not their fault.
And let’s not forget SMTP which is a core part of web3 because it’s a decentralized protocol after all. What amazing foresight they had in 1980 to build a web3 protocol before web1 even existed!
True.

I liked the term web3 somehow, but the more I read how people react to it, it might be already burned.
Where I really need docker, I also need VMware workstation more. It’s been a limiting factor for me. Was asking to ensure this wasn’t some trickery but sounds promising. I already have WSL working just didn’t think to try docker in that layer!
Lots of indie hackers defeat blind luck and exit as much as the small percentage founders receive in a funded startup.

Lots of good reading out there
Haha I put sleep-retry to every explicit memory allocation in every delphi program I wrote since windows xp and not one person acknowledged it as a good practice. This is just too good.
> I use chromium for roll20, because there is just a lot of things that are just broken on firefox.

Same here. I will pay for an alternative to Roll20 that works on FF. Bonus points for open source with a hosted version.
What are your greener pastures?
Pretty simple: Start doing it on the side until you have product market fit and/or some cash coming in.

You don't need to pay yourself to work yet, just find more hours. Wakeup at 5 AM and do it before work.

You'll want her to be on board.
> what would be the impetus?

That there are many issues with general purpose programming languages such as those outlined by the author in the article?

> I suspect this is the fate of any little language that successfully eliminates the need for engineers: if we can take a piece of a domain and describe it in a DSL that is streamlined enough for no-effort onboarding, it won't take very long for the DSL to be made redundant by GUI tools that are even easier to use.

That seems ideal! Domain-specific languages have always benefited from GUI tooling alongside anything that is less clunky as textual representation.
I'm not the best person to give counterexamples here, but a classical demo of "lack of regularity" would be the point-in-polygon problem (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_in_polygon).

Say you have a spiral-shaped but simple polygon that's wrapped around a query point. Even if your query point is far from the innermost "loop" of the spiral, a raycast could be arbitrarily confused if the sprial has many "thin" loops on the outside. (However, notably, the bits precision required would be a reasonable function of the spiral's specification. My point is just that fuzziness in general can be a compounding problem as a CG algorithm "progresses".)
$1000 in current market value for a bunch of stuff I bought and never use anymore, without having to deal with the BS of selling a bunch of items online
>But then you'd be doing science and statistics in pursuit of understanding how to make humanity the best it can be

I can not possibly imagine an idea which has done more harm to humanity than that one.
What you described is capitalism as intended. Is this the reality or just a few big players and monopolies?
Since CPU is a "compressible" resource, system load doesn't affect the determinism. It'll make it slower of course. Since memory is a non-compressible resource, things can start getting killed by the OOM-killer and there's nothing we can do about it. There are also certainly things like external network communication and file system access that are non-deterministic that must be handled at a higher level (e.g., with a reproducible FS image or by recording & replaying network traffic).
Emacs is cool, but I prefer VIM because of its leanness (and I'm quite fast with it). Sublime Text when I want that GUI nicety and JetBrains for languages that do require an IDE.
I don't program a lot these days. You are right, it is quite alpha, but I am very hopeful about it.
I wonder if if there is a safe value we could clamp audio to now and recompile that the speakers may not be loud but would at least be usable without being unsafe (I know there is an option to just enable them outright and recompile right now).
I've generally heard of people playing over a weekend. So things like meals and sleeping sometimes happen during the negotiation turns.
What's the difference between Diataxis and the Divio documentation framework? https://documentation.divio.com/
Whataboutism. If you argue with a greater evil, nothing will ever be solved. Quatar did/does some nasty things and right now people have the possibility to boycott. Right now it's there and we will talk about it.
All countries do nasty things all the time. But currently we're looking east.
Pretty sure doing labor to not die and selling your labor to survive are pretty similar.

I think for the average person the tradeoff has been very positive - look at life expectancy and health outcomes from any point in history versus today. Just look at the incidence of famine in Europe historically: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Famine#Europe

For sure there are philosophical, etc. questions that come up - but they are decidedly higher on Maslow's hierarchy than basic survival. If the old state of things were so appealing - people have the option to go back and start their own farm. Almost nobody does.

The fact that people glorify (or wear rose colored glasses about) how things were in the past is just exemplary of the bubble we are all living in.
Is this test available to the public?