skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yeah, and most of those media advances, when consumed for as many hours per day as tik tok is, will have a huge negative impact on a person.

I would say the same about someone watching that much TV, and do think the same of myself when I used to play video games that much. It's pleasurable and feels good, but for long term mental health (not to mention physical) it's catastrophic.

I'm not talking about hopping on and watching 15 mins of tik tok in the evening, but that's not how it's usually consumed
Twitter won't automagically stay online. A complex system needs dedicated and experienced engineers to maintain it, apply updates and troubleshoot issues, and that's if you're not actively developing new features.

So it will coast for a while before the wheels come off. Maybe performance will degrade, maybe media stops loading or your timeline won't refresh. Maybe none of that happens and a critical system deep down fails and it just stops. But Musk has all but ensured that Twitter in its current form cannot continue to function.
You approve of having to have two charging ports in one smartphone?
A longer copyright, but no patent protection.
The source is a random tweet. It's incredible to see people consume such propaganda wholesale. There seems to be a derangement when it comes to Elon Musk, people will literally believe anything. Millions of people last week ACTUALLY BELIEVED that Elon Musk shut down the the microservice responsible for 2FA. The source of that story was also a random tweet.
This is the same NSA which backdoored Dual_EC_DRBG right?
Literally from the law:

> The application of the laws to new charging technologies should be regularly reviewed.
Billionares have a support system of other billionares giving one another handsies. I'm sure if Musk was in danger of feeling pain someone like Thiel or Bezos would step up to give him a hand perhaps without interest even.

I agree "fuck him", but sadly I doubt he'll suffer much of a fallout of this.

That said I am riding the sweet wave of schadenfreude and do hope that twitter crashes and burns (and that everyone who works there gets severance)
Build, Store and Run VM images? This is the way
Docker made building, storing and running container images painless by giving you:
- a minimal configuration management domain specific language, the Dockerfile
From alpine
...

- an easy way to build and locally store container images
docker image build -t websever:v1 .

- an easy way to remotely store the images
docker image push websever:v1

- an easy way to run the images
docker container run webserver:v1

Saya gives you the same Dev(Ops) eXperience, so that, to build, store and run VM images, you just do:
saya image build -t websever:v1 .
saya image push websever:v1
saya vm run webserver:v1

Easy enough? What say you?

You can find more about and download Saya at: https://cloudwesen.com/saya/index.html

Best

Patrice
>- Built a business trip packing / iterinerary recommendation system, using just Google Sheets plugins

Hey, can you point me to this tool? I would love to use this tool.
As a non American, first time, I am seeing that Apples have brands.
If you enjoy independent films that mostly consist of people talking in very few different locations, I strongly recommend Coherence. It's pretty different but I think I enjoyed both of these for similar reasons.
Microservice security design patterns for Kubernetes (2019)
Next time record your outer shell while doing this. You might discover that all of this is in your head.

All arguments made about god like things are true here too.

Things like: why would anyone care about us humans specifically.

Why would they be 'elves'.

Plenty of 'normal' people believe in very stupid things like loch Ness etc.

We know no one who just changed physical laws.

Also you do sound like you prepare yourself, guess who aligns himself to those types of stories? Exactly you do.

You prepare yourself by traveling there and doing it with some old dude in some jungle.

You could just do Aya in your lifing room tbh.

I personally would try to avoid assuming this is more than it is. This might become a dangerous brain and reality killing self journey instead of something crazy to experience.

For me personally LSD told me not that there is something else out there but allowed me to feel and realize how fragile my brain can be. It helps me to have more empathy for brain illnesses.

It also stabiled my life by knowing the normal boring world is just what it is: real. I still need to work and earn money and fees myself even after a trip etc.
I wish libraries would go digital and rent out ebooks to people. They could pay authors based on reads.
This is also my problem with this legislation. There is legitimate innovation in connector design. Surely people remember micro USB cables, which weren't really that good. I certainly never would have wanted them to become a mandated standard.

While I think USB-C is quite well designed, this legislation makes it extremely hard for a superior standard to arise. The only reason USB-C has any grounds to be a mandated standard is because it already is widely used. For an alternative standard to arise, first you would need to convince multiple nation state governments and/or a multi-nation government to allow the standard to be used, even before it made it to market.
Probably yes: but that also means you can't just obsolete people's investments in USB-C. I still remember the era when you could get all sorts of iPod stands and furniture with 30-pin connectors in. Those hung around for years after Apple decided to make them worthless.
Is Unsion committed to pure functions in order to support this?
The hardware game is nuts but there are niche communities out there that you can join
This youtube made it click for me what is actually going on:

Git for ages 4 and up - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ffBJ4sVUb4
Why would the attacker use RSA-155? The obvious answer is data size because all of the files have a symmetric key that must be encrypted in the field size and communicated. Let's not go into any helpful discussions around that, but, I would like to ask if there is another reason. Perhaps the attacker uses the exact same procedure to crack their own keys because they have to assume that their private key is compromised and/or unsafe to use in a decryption scenario.

Also, I just realized how cryptocurrency wallet draining happens with these infections. I thought it was because they scanned the whole drive for private keys and sent those separately. It seems it's probably more accidental: The user gets to send them one file to decrypt.
Yes and no. This is a short/mid-term directive and as well a power-plug standard. Which is common across the world for decades. We all happily live with that already. Anyway, your basic idea is leading in a good direction and shall cover all important features:

* Replacement parts for 5 (smartphone), 10, 15, 20, 25 or 30 (plane) years
* Open specification for replacement parts (manufacturer goes out of business, third parties take over)
* Maintenance manuals. Like Lenovo provides for ThinkPads with explosive diagrams. FOR FREE.
* If software is included, manufacturer must state in packaging how long upgrades and updates will be provided.
* If software is included, it must be user replaceable. Even on an appliance, the manufacturer must provide instructions (e.g. EEPROM, replaceable chip, dongle which shows that software was user modified -> important for safety)
* Repairability
* More stuff...

And every half year this rules will be re-evaluated and will show it with traffic signal colors {green, yellow, red}. Therefore it will adopt constantly and not a fixed final law. The taxes for red signals will pay for this constant re-evaluation. So you can still buy an iPhone but it will show some green parts and a lot of red. And an Android will show similar things. While a ThinkPad will probably show a lot of green but one big fat red for the soldered RAM. It also doesn't state that a largely red product is from an "evil" manufacturer, maybe it is a small business shipping a small batch for a specific customer base. While, when you buy a product which is green in all areas, you probably made a long term investment.

PS: I doesn't necessarily need to rise prices, which politicians often do because it is "easy". Maybe replace the FAT or parts of it.
I found this "best practice" curious to read:

> The standard net/http server violates this advice and recovers panics from request handlers. Consensus among experienced Go engineers is that this was a historical mistake. If you sample server logs from application servers in other languages, it is common to find large stacktraces that are left unhandled. Avoid this pitfall in your servers.

I don't think I've ever seen a server library — HTTP or otherwise — that didn't have a top-level "catch all exceptions" or "recover from panic" step in place, so that if there's a problem, it can return 500 (or the Internal Server Error equivalent) to the user and then carry on serving other requests.

My reasoning is that any panic-worthy programming error is almost certainly going to be in the "business logic" part of the server, rather than the protocol-parsing "deal with the network" part, and thus, recoving from a panic caused by processing a request is "safe". One incoming request could cause a panic, but the next request may touch completely unrelated parts of the program, and still be processed as normal. Furthermore, returning a 500 error but having nobody read the stacktrace is bad, yes, but it's way, way, way better than having your server crash meaning nobody can use it ever.

Oh wait, is the assumption here that your service is being run under Borg and has another 1000 instances running ready to jump in and take the crashed one's place? Is this another case of Google forgetting that people use Go outside of Google, or am I reading too much into this?
You can perform very strong cryptography on a 70 cent microcontroller. While that is more than 50 cents, the considerations are quite simply not purely cost (and certainly not to the extent that you quote). Given your explanation, I do not see how my original interpretation is any different from what you actually meant - given that, I must question your reasoning about absolute cost-effectiveness and how much you need to sacrifice for this in practice.

I do not disagree with the premise that sometimes you must make tradeoffs based on cost, but I do disagree with the premise that a platform that you yourself say is not so good should be used because to do otherwise is to (potentially) lose a lot of money. If we get to chips that are a few cents a piece and somehow still need encryption, perhaps you are correct. Then we can be at peace with encryption that only defeats casual snooping. In all other cases, this seems like a poor tradeoff.
A deep dive into AWS Resource Explorer
At least you can grep that column name in the source code to find out where other taxes are calculated. Of course an ORM can further complicate this.
Every time I try to write Perl, between the sigils, weak support for numbers, and the archaic-feeling way of handling parameters in subroutines, I come away slightly disgusted. The convenience of the text processing routines is not a novelty or productivity improvement compared to other languages nowadays. And Perl seems slower than Python now on the kinds of workloads where I would be tempted to use Perl. What am I missing?
Thank you! I _knew_ there was a word for it :P
This tax payer doesn't.
It is comparable now, but was not even on radar back in 2012. My original point was about hindsight.

Ten years ago Tesla was much better ride than any other premium segment car.

That said, even today Tesla EV sales dwarf Audi, so the figurative Tesla lunch remains uneaten. That's what you have for playing catch-up.
if you love apple varieties this account showcases some of the more unusual ones: https://www.instagram.com/pomme_queen/
Teams is literally Skype for Business with a different skin, there's loads of traces of Skype left over where they haven't bothered to change the name.
Sharing a tutorial to modularize ML Systems
Show HN: Speech Racer – A speaking test for speed and accuracy
Everyone says this, but in terms of discoverability of the actual apis I have found the opposite is true. Azure tends to have docs with small mistakes, but they are extremely thorough. With AWS it seems to be a tossup: You can be lucky and have complete and accurate information, or you can be fucked.
I always scroll to the bottom of the HN comments to see the non-woke take. I was not disappointed!

Elon is about the most capable entrepreneur of the 21st century. He could start from scratch and have something more awesome and profitable than Twitter in a few years. He had an extreme culture problem though it seems. The company had been taken over by ideologues and was losing 4 million a day.

He had to get rid of everyone who wasn't aligned with his new vision. He had to depoliticize the company which meant firing most of the staff. He'll probably have to move it to Texas or make it fully remote if he wants to finish depoliticizing it.

What does depoliticizing even mean? It making the company about maximizing profit, not transforming society based on the political value of its actions.
That is just a formatting guide. How to write spaces, newlines, semicolons.

Go fmt doesn't change anything that is not formatting.
Waymo shows off its futuristic “transportation as a service” vehicle
Yep, that's what Joe Exotic is in jail for.
Reviewing the sed isn't going to help you spot the instance that shouldn't have been replaced or the missing substitution.
Interesting. I wonder if it is being studied as well.
Have you looked into some of the "fantasy consoles," such as Pico8 [0] or TIC80 [1]?
These emulate "8-bit machines" with graphics and sound, and are completely self-sufficient systems. Compared to real 8-bit machines, your creations can easily be shared as they can be exported to run directly on web pages. The shared place for projects is also a wonderful place to learn from others: from running a game to inspecting the code is a matter of pressing `esc`.

[0]: https://www.lexaloffle.com/pico-8.php
[1]: https://tic80.com/play?cat=0&sort=2
I'm not defending the sigils because they are terrible, but the reason you can't just get rid of them is that they are actually used.

For instance:

my @arr = ("Larry", "Moe", "Curly");

my $len = @arr;

will store 3 in $len. Application codebases and libraries make use of this kind of thing everywhere.

You can find some of the reasoning why in interesting essays like this: http://www.wall.org/~larry/natural.html

Larry Wall was trying to incorporate some natural language features in Perl, unsuccessfully in this case but I would say it went very well in others.
Part of the set is who is there, and if there's someone there who's experienced (or, ideally even trained in psychedelic therapy) and who you like and trust, they can help guide you and support you.

I suspect a lot of these bad trip reports and reports of adverse consequences long afterwards are by people who tripped recreationally, in poor settings, with little preparation, and little if any support during the trip, and no integration afterwards.
The most extensive Apple (pommes) database
It seems that way, but the timescale is massively compressed compared to even the most pessimistic estimates.

We were expecting a collapse in several months, not a few weeks.
Probably because they can't backdoor C/C++ generically. .
> ..every time I go back to it I get tripped up, over and over again, by the sigils, and the rest of the visual noise

From what I remember of writing Perl - it is a lovely language to write, but not to read. I remember going back to my own code and thinking what the hell am I doing here.
Mandating standards by laws isn't progress. It holds the future back. This and the EU will be looked back on as a disastrous piece of legislation in the future. It's amazing how nearsighted these governments are being.

Standards are universally created by industry organically, not created by governments.
Why would that be a problem at all? If a significant advance in charging connectors is made, they can simply amend the law.

These laws don't say you can't make better chargers, they say if you make a mass produced device from the provided categories and it's going to charge by cable you will need to make sure that it has at least one USB-C charging port.

Besides, this is only in EU(and India now). Sure, there's a Brussels effect but as you can see even with iPhone the companies can have multiple versions of a product. US iPhones don't have physical SIM cards anymore, the other have it. So if it happens that Apple invents significantly better charging port for the iPhone, they can sell those everywhere else in the world and EU can revisit the laws if there's an interest.
Memento mori is just the ultimate reduction of the sentiment.

The whole stoic philosophy behind it is interesting. It's not just that you will die no matter how long you can put it off for. Once you are gone all that's left of you will be memories and descendants.

Even if you are remembered for a long time, like for example someone as famous as Marcus Aurelius, those memories aren't you they're just a reduction. You're gone forever.

You could extend that to consider the self you were 10 years ago. That you is also gone forever.

All in all it can be a freeing thing to contemplate. All you have is the right now so enjoy it or at the very least bare it.
Automation in cybersecurity allows for faster detection of system intrusions.

Typically, automation in cybersecurity involves the use of AI and ML technologies to improve the company's analytical capability.

A few automation tools are already in use. Automation tools that can benefit a business's security include robotic process automation (RPA), security orchestration automation and response (SOAR), and security incident and event management (SIEM).
Could you please point me towards them?
1. Each feature will be assigned a release date

2. $45 purchase gets you all the current features and all the features updated in the next 1 year.

3. even if you don't renew, you can update to the latest version and enjoy the bugs.

4. can be purchased at any time for $15 for a second time.

This is the business model I recently developed for the Read Later software. There is a premise to implement this model "the software itself is not server dependent, all features are implemented locally"

Here is my pricing page. https://hamsterbase.com/pricing/
AMD finally opens up its Radeon raytracing analyzer “RRA” source code
I was literally just reading "there is no silver bullet" this week.

Quite the legacy, long may it last.
I was one of the people not only perplexed by the positioning, but that they managed to raise money. Props to Suhail for selling it - it does make me wonder how many great ideas are slipping through purely from VC's requiring flashy sales skills. But I guess that could be said about almost anything.
The Stadtler and Waldorf of high-finance.
In most cases, even though there's verbose variable names you still can't understand the why just by reading the code. And even if you did, why would one want to?

Most often I'm just skimming through, and actual descriptions are much better than having to read the code itself.

This whole notion of "documentation can get out of sync with the code, so it's better not to write it at all" is so nonsensical.

Why isn't the solution simply: "lets update the docs when we update the code". Is this so unfathomably hard to do?
Huh, I always figured the Banks novel was named for a quote. Pardon my ignorance of the classics, but where’s it from?
Since in reality, not even 4chan allows absolute free speech I see this whole thing as either disingenuous or naive.

> The argument doesn't depend on these sort of details

I would argue that without details arguments are just hand wavy.
Interesting to see these results! I wonder how Ruby 2.x would stack up in this same benchmark.
we are so early
They can't enter a new market at their own pace when it is eating demand for their existing market. If competitors wait another 10 years to bring a serious EV to market, they won't have the revenue to cover their expenses on their existing ICE business lines, much less fund the capex needed to get into EVs. And most car companies have a lot of debt, so the problem will be even worse.

Right now EVs make up such a minimal percentage of the car market that they aren't making a meaningful dent in ICE demand, but once they hit 10% or more, car companies that don't have a slice of that segment are going to be feeling it financially. I expect there will be major casualties in the car business because of failure to get into the EV market fast enough.
> I'm pretty sure almost all of this team was laid off (certainly the people I knew who worked on it were).

That's really sad news. The crew I interacted with (Alex, Omari, Tobias, others) were top-flight engineers who also really understood the problem space and how to navigate the internal complexities of Meta. Hope the laid off / repositioned staff are OK, and if they're looking for new opportunities my email's in my profile.
In other words: poor documentation.
Two charging ports do not work on a phone, space is tight in there already.

>Especially if the port is a brand new standard you'll never be able to borrow a charge cable for from a friend.

The solution to that are adapters.
My charger uses 180W for my personal laptop. My office laptop already has USB C and pulls 65W.
I wonder if other companies will follow Apple in crippling USB-C.

https://www.xda-developers.com/iphone-15-models-different-us...
Inductive charging, don't be silly.
Ok. I'd quibble about it being a capital gains tax at all, but anyway.
Micro USB was the EU standard, you already lived through that.

That's why every Android and gadget out there used it, as opposed to 50 other connectors before that on feature phones.

Apple found a loophole around it by shipping a dongle with iPhones. With the update to the standard that loophole was closed.
I'd rather it were about number of (perhaps some bar for popularity) models sold, not that multiplied by sales numbers. Apple shouldn't get a pass on Lightning just because the iPhone is popular IMO, it's about interoperability/repairability/longevity, not avoiding 'huh this is unusual'.
one of the amazon initiatives the CEO mentions they will continue to focus on is healthcare. While firing devices and books teams.

So, do they get more user data selling your prescription than selling you a kindle? I mean, obviously yes, but i am shocked that it is data they can sell.
Why because blm is some how pure? Is a construct to oppress.
The law allows newer standards to be used. USB-C is just the required minimum.

The goal of the law is to ensure standardization of connectors is happening, not to enforce USB-C forever.

If "no laws" would be the solution, Apple would have switched to USB-C already. Unfortunately they didn't, proving the law was necessary.
I don't think the implication was that millennials do this!!!!!! Rather they might say "Sure thing!" or "of course!".

Though I wonder how much is trying to be "chirpy" and how much is preemptively avoiding seeming abrupt or rude, particularly as most millennials have been fairly junior in the workforce until quite recently, meaning that they are often "talking upwards".
There are a lot more devices covered than just smartphones. Any superior connector can get market penetration in larger devices that have fewer problems with two charging ports (tablets, laptops, keyboards, battery operated loudspeakers, e-book readers, etc.). At that point the commission will either take notice on their own or can be lobbied to switch to the new connector with a sufficiently long transition period.