skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I've found that it's almost never needed. Most of the "advanced AI human detection" things are glorified IP reputation systems. So you just need a few IPs that would be way too painful to block, for example US residential IPs, and you're good.

But if you really want to make sure, it's pretty easy to remote-control a cheap Android phone. Plus detection thresholds tend to be much higher on mobile, because filling out a ReCaptcha with a touch screen is just such a horrible user experience.
> sentiment analysis

We’ll that’s certain to be going off lately.
> Using the model to generate content that is cruel to individuals is a misuse of this model. This includes, but is not limited to:

...
>+ Sexual content without consent of the people who might see it

I understand that it's their TOS and they can put pretty much anything in there, but this item seems... odd. I don't really know why exactly this stands out to me. Maybe it's because it's practically un-enforceable? Are they just covering all their bases legally?

Trying to think of a good metaphore; let's try this: If you are an artist and someone commissions you to create an art piece that might be sexual, can you say "ok, but you have to ask for consent before you show it to people", and you enshrine it in the contract. Obviously gross violations like trolling by spamming porn are pretty clear cut, but what about the more nuanced cases when you say, display it on your personal website? Are you supposed to have an NSFW overlay? Isn't opening a website sort of implying that you consent to seeing whatever is on there, unless you have a strong preconception of what content the page is expected to display?

I might be hugely overthinking this.
World of Warcraft and Other Blizzard Games Will Be Pulled from China
The UK is still much stronger economically than most of Europe (southern Europe especially).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FTX_(company) does a pretty good job, I think.
What makes you think someone who can't find a place to live for ten years can move to another country?
How many twitter articles does hacker news need a day?

I get it, you're social media junkies and your main supplier is now giving you tainted stuff. I'm sorry but that has almost nothing to do with technology and a lot to do with your own shortcomings.
You could have an incredibly simple universe generator that just produces universes with random laws of physics and random initial conditions. From our human point of view that's indistinguishable from a highly sophisticated universe generator, since we can only observe the successes (or rather only one, that by our definition is a success)
I wonder if that's how people will get out of lawsuits, by convincing the judge that no serious investor doing their due diligence would ever give these amateurs a single dollar.
https://archive.ph/l55Pa
Those are all fairly related. If you want real free opinions, armies of bots running amok trying to create narratives is bad. And advertisers tend not to like some real opinions(and get weaponized fairly frequently when people see some opinions) so you need to reduce your reliance on them as well. Not that I think that a real free opinion forum would be very interesting, we already have 4chan.
You seem to be part of the cover up!

The fact you likely aren't even aware of the incredible controversy around this topic makes clear the santization is working.
I think your questions were answered correctly by someone who was rather patient with you (am assuming the direct leader, but only speculating).

You asked if Y would be true given that X is true. It's called leading the question. The other party agreed with your assertion, hence the "would" as in "Y would be true, IF X were true," with the emphasis on the if being mine. Then you used that to assume X is true, which they never admitted to, so they corrected you by stating X isn't actually true.
Yes, because the result here is that investor money has been stolen by employees.

Again, if you work at an equity fund and you invest in a company that was obviously fraudulent, your investors don't go: "Oh well, better luck next time...shit happens, amirite?". If this happens in a PE fund, where there is direct oversight, then I would suspect that the investors would remove you as a manager.

The only responsibility you have is to protect your shareholder's interests. Not only was this disregarded but Sequoia gave them the structure that allowed them to steal from their own investors.

I have never seen a situation like this that didn't end up in charges against the fund managers because it is such an egregious failure (this, of course, won't happen here...everyone here has donated far too much money...but I have seen this professionally).
This is a perfect example of how American capitalism abhors competition. I have used smaller, non-approved slaughterhouses and there's nothing wrong with them. If enough small slaughterhouses prospered to make the market for meat competitive, our masters would change the regulations again. Both farmers and consumers are at the mercy of Smithfield, Tyson, JBS, Cargill. While regulators refuse to enforce the law, we will remain so.
Let me clarify some points at the risk of sounding like a Modi supporter. Modi had gone though investigations and was acquitted by the Supreme court of India. It was definitely failure of government mechanism and officials but not state sponsored voilence.

"
The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed allegations of "larger conspiracy" levelled by Zakia Jafri, widow of Congress leader Ehsan Jafri who was killed in the 2002 Gujarat riots, against former Chief Minister Narendra Modi and over 60 senior state officials.

Inaction or failure of "some officials of one section of the State administration" cannot be the basis to infer a pre-planned criminal conspiracy by the State government, the court held.

The failure of certain officials cannot be inferred as a "State-sponsored crime (violence) against the minority community", the Supreme Court said.

"

https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/2002-gujarat-riots-su...
(This is a left-leaning newspaper)

The thing with MBS is there was no independent investigation done by any agency in Saudi.
> The kernel internally makes no promises about ABI even in C

There might be two different definitions of “ABI” in this thread.

The kernel indeed makes no promises regarding e.g. the order in which structure members are declared or the stability of that order from version to version.

It probably can be said, though, to promise (through its interaction with the C compiler) that if you take a structure declaration as it appears in the source code, then in a normally-compiled kernel that structure will be laid out in a manner that’s predictable and most probably even described in a human-readable document. Those rules usually have not changed for decades (even if I sometimes wish they were different).

As far as I know, unless you ask for that specifically, the Rust compiler does not promise any of that, the only documentation for what it will do by default is the source code, and it is free to change the rules from version to version with no notice.
> US benefits when oil prices increase

I’m not sure about that. Generally the US economy benefits from lower oil prices and I think that outweighs any losses incurred by the oil industry. That’s especially relevant now with inflation being such a huge concern.
inches is not the same thing as length, yet they're indelibly linked.
People do this since many years now circumventing banks and payment providers who would take a huge fee.

Take an individual case and add up all the end to end fees associated with doing this. Most likely, they are still huge.

A lot of these people aren't really saving much money compared to traditional banking. They're doing this for convenience because they can't easily get a bank account or don't want one because they operate outside the system.
In the US at least we have sufficient agricultural land.

Why do you think I need help? That seems highly presumptuous. Asking questions about the fundamental nature of suffering hardly implies a lack of compassion. Perhaps someone can help you learn how to avoid drawing illogical conclusions.
> Your only way out is to be the head of your state.

Or a diplomat https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Harry_Dunn
Via https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-03747-9, "Extreme numbers get new names":

The prefixes ronna and quetta represent 10^27 and 10^30, and ronto and quecto signify 10^−27 and 10^−30. Earth weighs around one ronnagram, and an electron’s mass is about one quectogram.

This is the first update to the prefix system since 1991, when the organization added zetta (10^21), zepto (10^−21), yotta (10^24) and yocto (10^−24).
Sure, read docs.nabaz.io (CI solution w/ storage over mongodb)
That's interesting, because I feel the exact same way but on the opposite side. "we do that too, and it is bad." just reads as deflection to me. This comment section is full of it and it's very tiresome.
Because entirely successful communication is impossible. It never occurs.

Because mostly successful communication is difficult. People do not entirely understand what they are "saying"; people do not entirely understand what they are "hearing"; people do not achieve consensus on the meaning of the terms utilized beforehand. As a result, people are almost never participating in the same conversation.

Because of a lack of training. Because of particular neurological configuration. Because of past emotional conditioning. Because of social pressures.

Because brains.
It's sad but thats what I'm starting to realize.
So is https://twitter.com/gabor

https://t2.social/
The rule is that if you arbitrarily block American companies then your country gets blocked too. It's called fair competition. If you open your country for American companies that are treated the same as your companies then we will do the same. Otherwise, no. The Chinese government and it's companies should not be treated as American citizens.
In the three projects I've been on that used rust, there really hasn't been much of that. Mostly I have been surprised at how high level it feels even with all the control. I do think the type of project makes a difference. I have been doing mostly dsp type stuff. And coming at it from the mindset of ocaml or modern c++ (value semantics etc.) Vs the ansi c mindset I used on TI DSPs back in the day makes a big difference. And that is the problem with bolting on the safety. The borrow checker doesn't just find mistakes, it also forces you to code in a different style so it can reliabily do so. Not necessarily a better style, but not slower either, a different and easier style for it to check. The syntax could have been closer to c, but the style would end up being similar. As far as all the complexity getting added, ferrocene or someone like them may end up making a safety critical subset like spark is to ada, that is simpler to do formal verification on. That would be a good subset for drivers and kernels.
This is what happens when you habitually work hundred plus hour weeks and perhaps get only five hours sleep a night. There's little to no method to his madness at this point.
So good to know there's a $dozens MRR club :) same here with https://apps.apple.com/app/supreme/id1281516834 but upgrading old iOS code to SwiftUI is a bit of a pain
Trump highlighted this program in his 2024 announcement yesterday,

We will again have peace through strength. We will protect our people from the unthinkable threat of nuclear weapons and hypersonic missiles, the United States must also build a state of the art next generation missile defense shield, we need it, the power of these missiles and the power of a word that I refuse to say, nuclear, we have to have it, we need a defense shield. And we have to do it and we actually have the technology and we're gonna build it. Just as I rebuilt our military, I will get this done.

We will plant our beautiful American flag very soon on the surface of Mars, which I got started. But we need everyone involved. We need everyone's help. We need to look out for one another. We need to be friends. And we need every Patriot on board. Because this is not just a campaign, this is a quest to save our country, talking about saving our country. Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you very much.

Most Republicans including DeSantis also support the program. I think Elon believed the Senate would go Republican last week and he could be called a kingmaker.
It's just how it works unfortunately. Imagine if the whole world should justifiably call for arresting three decades of US presidents and generals over all the murders and deaths in the middle east, how would that work? Would you agree to it?
Biden's name isn't uttered in this article at all. Nor are there any statements from any Fed or government officials saying they're trying to do this. Any such suggestions are interpretations being made by independent analysts trying to read the tea leaves.

Try again.
I think it's because we can scan it easily. Groups of 4 or more can confuse the eye: when looking at 5 things, you sometimes have to take a moment to realize it's 5 not 4 (and, to a lesser extent, the same is true of 4).

groups of 3 have first, middle, last - crucially _one_ middle digit, not 2+, which makes for quick comprehension.
And the US complains about Russia in Ukraine

This comedy is fascinating
Ask vs. Guess[0] culture/communication can also great confusing gaps between people who have different styles.

[0] https://ask.metafilter.com/55153/Whats-the-middle-ground-bet...
If you define real as "things that can be seen and confirmed by others" then I agree, I think the only useful argument is whether these hallucinations are any more or less "real" than what we perceive during sober states. When we're sober sobriety feels more real, when we're tripping the trip feels more real, there's no reason to believe either one over the other except that it's easy to justify the realness of sobriety by getting confirmation from other people, but with our utter lack of ability to comprehend the true nature of reality there's no reason to believe that this shared sober reality is completely "real" or that it's the only "real" reality. I think any skeptic should be skeptical in both directions
About $2billion is owned by the Saudi prince with a penchant for murdering journalists. So... maybe?
* Lacking the ability to concisely identify what is being asked possibly due to non-typical brain functions.

* Social skills lacking due to upbringing and/or medical conditions

* Dwelling a lot on information and not enough on nuance or emotion

* Feeling superior and communicating in a way that advances what you think is important more than what the audience want to know

* Not giving enough value to why the person is asking the question or wants you to articulate your message

* Lacking self-awareness and not even knowing that they are communicating badly

* Too much on their mind to easily detach into communication mode

* Don't care enough about the people they are communicating with so they don't try

* Not considering the intent of the forum they are in. Is this something for noobs, for PMs, for Managers? Is someone asking me for an opinion?

* Sometimes the question/discussion is not as clear as the asker thinks it is, so rubbish in equals rubbish out.

* Sometimes I honestly don't know like when you think you've asked something really clear and the answer is confused, you try again but eventually just have to quit!
Pipelines are notoriously dirty, since the owners can't seem to stop them from leaking, spilling, blowing up, or otherwise malfunctioning. Wikipedia has a handy list of lists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_pipeline_accidents_in_.... If somebody wanted to put an oil pipeline near my property I'd definitely wouldn't feel safe with it there.
I mean, if nothing else, it’s a fascinating business case study playing out in real time.
AFAIK, the VVC Decoder in Mediatek are for TV only, not Mobile. So the power usage is quite different. But I did expect Qualcomm to have VVC since they promised it in 2020 and 2021.
It's possible (if not probable) that they are frustrated with you as well. Perhaps your questions show your lack of basic competence around the topics you are asking about, and they feel the need to either give you a bunch of background you would need to properly understand, or else they have decided it is hopeless to try to bring you up to speed so they are trying to say some stuff that will satisfy you and make you go away.
The government should be concerned about protecting its citizens, as well as its political and economic environment. If a product is unsafe, it should be regulated; if the producer does not comply, it should be banned.
That's an interesting point. I live in Southern California, in Los Angeles. I'm maybe a 50 minute drive from Oxnard where a large portion of our vegetables are grown. (If I recall, more vegetables in the US come from Ventura County than any other place in the world.) They don't have to be shipped very far and a lot more stuff is in season here than in other parts of the country. Just checking the things the person above mentioned on my local Ralph's (Kroger's), I see the cheapest ground beef = $5.99/lb. and brussels sprouts are $2.99/lb. for loose sprouts. That seems like a high price ratio to me, but I certainly don't know all of the logistics.
look, my real free opinions are so important that i'm willing to automate sharing them!
This is called "Realpolitik": international relations are meant to serve your national interests, not ethical principles. By now, the main national interest in the West is to not give oil money to the psychotic butcher in Moscow. The Saudi butcher is a little less psychotic by comparison.

There are dozens of philosophers that advanced this idea: Sun Tzu, Machiavelli, Thomas Hobbes,...

Many of the most famous statesmen in history were followers of this principle: Richelieu, Frederik the Great, Von Clausewitz, Otto Von Bismark, Metternich, Henry Kissinger,... Unsurprisingly, many of them were Germans. And none of them was a nice person.
Well, will they receive their severance... if they have a payroll department of zero people?
I thought the rule of law was the reason behind the endless quest to disqualify Trump from being the President or running for the Presidency, but actually heads of state can sawzall barely-critical journalists into a pile of body parts as a fee for a marriage license.
Oh the Chinese are far worse at oppressing their own people, but the US seems to do a much better job of abusing foreign nations. It's not an apples to apples comparison.
I guess I mean an expanded view of nutrition science, where we fully understand the effects of what we eat. This would be beyond engineering.

One thing about engineering is it can succeed or fail fairly quickly, and the results can mostly be replicated. We build a reactor and we soon know whether it works or not. And reactors are something we understand enough that we can design them, and create them.

Meanwhile in nutrition we're making educated guesses and watching what happens over decades. What helps one person kills another. We're using statistics to tease out the truth, to get mere glimpses of the truth. We're on the outside making educated guesses about a system beyond our full comprehension.

A final thought: Which will happen first: commercially viable fusion energy, or the obesity rate in the US falling below 25%? Which would you bet on? (I am considering the challenge of how to improve the diet and nutrition of an entire nation under the umbrella of "nutrition science" here.)
https://archive.ph/wTZwn
> they may wander off to topics they feel more comfortable with

Or they intentionally want to steer the group towards discussing those topics either for their own benefit or because they believe it is the right problem to bring into focus. If they are successful in doing so without coming across as rude, that could be viewed as great communication even if it leaves some questioning communication skills; it really depends on the situation. You see this all the time in political debates and while it's easy for some to see the situation for what it is, it typically rolls off the masses and the candidates are better for moving the debate to topics that are more in-line with their strengths and positioning. If a candidate is able to use such tactics and become elected, it would be incredibly difficult to state that she or he is a poor communicator.
He did it on 5th Ave. :-)
Even better, how the fuck do you triage a system you've never touched before, that most likely is overengineered to hell and back, while the guys responsible for getting you splunk creds are still trying to find out who can give them THEIR creds to get in themselves.
I've read the assertions section a few times and I still don't understand the argument. How is:

if got == nil {
t.Errorf("blog post was nil, want not-nil")
}

Better than

assert.NotNil(t, got, "blog post")

? They seem to suggest that you lose context, but their "Good" examples are similarly devoid of context.
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2022/11/debunking-the-petrod....
Musk got rid of teslas a long time ago, seems par for the course for him
What does it have to do if Republicans? You're giving refs and links but not a single one of them makes any mention of Republicans.

Also your intro doesn't match your refs.
Not your exact question but I think some people miss providing context because they don’t or can’t see through another’s viewpoint and do a diff on what the other person knows or doesn’t.
I believe that at least some of it is lack of empathy and perspective. People too often don't stop to think about what the questioner is actually asking, from their perspective. So the answers come from a different perspective, often missing the real question. We could of course also sometimes place blame on poorly formulated questions, but a really good communicator will be able to recognize that and get to the heart of the topics and make sure that everyone is coming to a common understanding
Most of the perpetrators are in early thirties; they will do 10 years and be out by their 40th birthday. Once they are out, they will dig out the millions of dollars worth of bitcoins they have probably hidden away in thumbdrives or CDs.

I know nothing of Crypto or law but I did watch Shawshank Redemption.
The problem isn't that Judas turned him in, it's that this is somehow a bad thing.
Let's just go back to FIDOnet
I don't know how prices translate, but where I live in the US you usually get corn in the husk for $1 each. I prefer it in the husk because cooking with it on makes it taste better.
There's even an official per-mille symbol: ‰

My graduate advisor loved slipping it into papers just to show it off. I had to dissuade him at least once because it was in the middle of a table of percentages and who is going to that the 7th entry out of 12 has ‰ instead of %?
To be tolerant, you have to be intolerant of intolerance.
I wonder how much cheaper Oil would be if we attacked SA after 911 instead of Iraq.
My experience: " should we buy eggs? " The response will come with a detailed explanation of what were the last 20 eggs used for, and the probability that more are needed, pondered by the probability of going in the supermarket in the next days... In the middle of the dissertation I would interrupt with "honey, I just need to know if we need to buy." Final reply "OF COURSE WE NEED, HAVEN'T YOU HEARD ME?! I EXPLAINED THAT PRETTY CLEARLY"... yeah...
This is a situation where lawsuits will be flying and a lot of very wealthy people who can afford lawyers and lost lots of money will be casting about for any deep pockets they can find and any scapegoats they can blame.

It is likely that nobody will sue this CEO, but a nontrivial part of that is precisely that this guy is correctly covering his bum. By being ready for this battle, he will probably never have to fight it. And that's only "probably". I wouldn't guarantee it. I would have some clauses about this written into my contract before I took the job.