skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This reminds me of this quote:

> Ironically, both genders are motivated by the same factor not wasting time but we do it in reverse. To overgeneralize, women think: Why waste my time meeting in person if I'm not into his personality? (Then Tinder-messaging is used to help screen for personality.) And men think: Why waste my time Tinder-messaging if I'm not going to meet her in person?

Source: https://www.glamour.com/story/tinder-guys-dont-message
"An OS is the thing in about Linux (kernel) scope"

I'm using the standard street definition in which the OS is everything that you get on a fresh (desktop) OS install, not just the kernel.

There's very little research available on kernels because their shape is largely dictated by the hardware design, and the hardware design is largely dictated by physics and what the manufacturers give us. But as you go further up the stack the options widen considerably. You can start to consider user interfaces, application programming models, etc.

"You just need to build capability security into CPUs, the OS, and all apps…"

Pure cap systems are an old idea that have never worked. They're too cumbersome for programmers and affect API design in problematic ways.

But here's the thing. If you disagree, you can go ahead and prove it. You don't need a custom CPU. Figure out the higher level software issues first, and if you ever get to the point of needing actual CPU changes then fork qemu and virtualize your intended design. Make it so custom hardware is just an optimization once the core ideas are worked out.

That's what I mean by doing stuff at a higher layer. The interesting and tractable problems are all at the level where you can just throw up a fullscreen window, use direct IO to grab a block of disk space and off you go. Start from the top and work down, not bottom and work up.

BTW you'd probably like the Mill architecture. It tackle a lot of the things you're talking about. Comes out of the commercial world though, not academia.
"It's a fact...that in societies like ours sex truly represents a second system of differentiation, completely independent of money; and as a system of differentiation it functions just as mercilessly. The effects of these two systems are, furthermore, strictly equivalent. Just like unrestrained economic liberalism, and for similar reasons, sexual liberalism produces phenomena of absolute pauperization . Some men make love every day; others five or six times in their life, or never. Some make love with dozens of women; others with none. It's what's known as 'the law of the market'...Economic liberalism is an extension of the domain of the struggle, its extension to all ages and all classes of society. Sexual liberalism is likewise an extension of the domain of the struggle, its extension to all ages and all classes of society."

Taken from Houellebecq novel Whatever. I agree with the general idea, which is also one of the reasons why I think prostitution should be legal.
It's all personal, so you aren't wrong, but I have the near opposite opinion.

I believe the days messaging are a waste of time as I have no clue if a spark is there in person before I see you in the flesh. And very quickly, short time for physical attraction, and within 2-3 minutes for interaction, I can tell if there is the potential for something growing. None of that happens in messaging beyond very basic filtering of basic comms.

Messaging back and forth really doesn't mean much for me. I spend relationships with a person in the flesh, and message not very often, so initial contact on dating websites beyond a few basic messages back and forth are essentially just more dancing around before we get to the brass tax of whether there is any chance at all of attraction.

But that's me and how it worked for me and my partner. Everyone's different of course.
And why waste time chatting online? The first person to land a successful in person session is winning, generally speaking.
Not from an ethical perspective, but from a personal one - I do regret putting so much effort into a past project that to me looked like it had a lot of potential to move things.

There were lots of open questions, not only tech-wise, but also business-wise that made me really anxious (in both senses) to get to work on them. So I pushed the stakeholders to discover what they wanted. I asked for definitions of terms, clarification on business language, workshops to figure out what it is my software was supposed to improve, what problems it was supposed to solve.

I sat down with them and explained Agile from A to Z while also writing code, reviewing code, writing CI/CD pipelines, talking to other teams about architecture, and generally putting in work wherever it was useful - and that was everywhere.

Then a week before my 3 month trial period was up, I was told to clear my desk until the end of the day because that was not what the company was looking for. End of story.

I don't regret doing everything I did, but I do regret not playing it smart politically and doing it out in the open.
Many people don't care to engage in explicitly relationship-seeking activities, which includes going to clubs and bars, mixers for singles, online dating and such. Some see it as an obvious signal of desperation/undesirableness.

If I have to resort to this, it implies no one among my peers whom I already see every day because I study or work or live next to them or hang out with their friends etc. is willing to have a relationship with me. (Or they were but then dumped me. Or my standards are idealistic and any real person I know sufficiently well will fall short, guaranteeing a short or dysfunctional relationship for you. Or I am in a relationship and am dishonest to my partner. Most explanations would not be in my favor, except maybe if I lead a solitary life without much social contact and that also begs the question why (unemployed? nomadic? etc.))
Interesting, I have no exposure to Apple ecosystem so I would not encounter it - thanks for letting me know!
I live in Europe and I don’t know anyone who suffered professionally from approaching coworkers, and it’s very common.
We need more water than rain can provide: refilling rivers with desalination
Take a look at the older Ioniq (28kW and 38kW models).

They look like "normal" cars (since the same body was used for their PHEV version) and aren't that expensive.

The one with the smaller battery can do ~150-200km reliably, but charges really fast. The bigger battery one does an easy 250km in the summer, but has a hobbled charging speed.
Thanks for pointing out the mistake, but since the people giving birth are women and only women can give birth then what is the need to change the terms? They're included.
I really like the fact that Notesnook and Standard Notes went open source for some of their components.
There are many reasons why war pigeons[1] are superior to planes. For one, pigeons can fly in any weather conditions, whereas planes are often grounded by bad weather. Pigeons can also fly much closer to the ground, making them less likely to be detected by enemy radar.

(Written by GPT-3)

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Pigeon
Thank you for answering or refuting most troll/red herring/lazy ignorance questions and comments.
Tuvalu turns to the metaverse as rising seas threaten existence
>which, honestly... they're probably all overworked and should have more breaks anyway

And your best solution to this is building automated lighting systems that omit functionality? That's your grand plan?

Reminds me of people that complain about seats being removed from buses to make more room for passengers because homeless people sleep on them.

When you're trying to solve things via tertiary order effects you should consider if that's the real issue at hand
.
"I find text chatting with a stranger to very difficult compared to talking in person"

I've always just talked on the phone. I know a lot of younger people are afraid of phone conversations too, but I'm fortunate to be of an older generation for whom it's not a big deal.

I guess you could also try a Zoom date.
Sizing the hash map appropriately is one of the tuning knobs to usually achieve the O(1) desired complexity, in theory you are right, but tuning away from that in practice this does not or rare enough happens is the goal why you actually chose a hash map for hopefully close to O(1)?
Congrats! Do you support login with keycloak/OpenID?
Wow, too much information... :) I looked at some of the links folks left in other comments, and those recommendations are quite interesting. Your site is great but has lots of options!...
Great timing. It's my turn to write a Lisp, and I was just thinking about implementing reader macros this morning :-)

My goal is to create the barest-metal Lisp OS (basically Lisp REPL with full ring-0 access, the OS) with an asm reader macro to write low level assembly opcodes you can jmp into.

(defn add1 (x)
(declare x int64)
#asm(
mov rax, %x
add rax, 1
))

(Just thought of this syntax on the spot, I'm a few dozen hours away from that still.)
Mildly interesting quirks of C
Worth noting (for parenthesis-lovers!) the Fennel support added by Phil Hagelberg, as demoed e.g. in one of his Lisp Game Jam writeups here: https://technomancy.us/193
Safety. Establishing that the other person is safe to meet.
If you read more about (post-war) Soviet economy, you'll notice how money's role was secondary, and what was really important in the industry was access to goods that were in short supply (that is, nearly all of them), and various "limits" of access which the government set. Also, corporate lobbyists were a thing, and played a major role in getting access to these limited goods, getting them on time, and raising the "limits". As some researches pointed out, the Cold War-era Soviet system was an "administrative market".
How many of these nations

- Had naval ships in the region at the time of the sabotage, conducting tests of remote controlled underwater exploding drones?

- were previously caught with such a drone (seafox) sitting underneath the same pipeline that was blown up, and in the same location, in 2015? https://www.pipeline-journal.net/news/explosive-laden-drone-...
https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/gazprom-just-released-th...

- have a history of blowing up pipelines, including previously blowing up a Russian pipeline?

- had a chief executive declare that said they "have the means" to put an end to the pipeline, even though it was not in their territorial waters and they had no legal means to do it?

I mean, you can argue that it's speculation, but to argue that it's speculation without basis is false. This is a highly monitored part of the Baltic Sea, right next to a Danish island, in the Swedish exclusive economic zone, and close to a Polish NATO base. It's not the middle of nowhere. It's not some place where we don't know who was there. We know who had ships there at the time of the sabotage, and who had the technical means to do it. That's when you start getting into debates about US versus UK, but not Azerbaijan versus Venezuela.
I've always loved Matchbox because they made mundane, everyday cars that you could see on the streets. I know I'm in the minority with my love for the ordinary cars, but even as a child I would have much rather played with a Ford Sierra than a hot rod.
The Guardian/Observer is a UK newspaper. I wouldn’t expect it to solely reflect US cultural norms.
Greg Bear, I think, may be the last of the major classic scifi authors. Author C Clarke is gone, so is Frank Herbert and Robert Heinlein and Isaac Asimov. I can't think of any who are still alive who belong to that club.
No, OLD sucks also for attractive men who didn't select a good picture and don't truly now how attractive they are. Moreover they will get the impression that getting a mate is very hard even if it would be pretty simple with some courage in real life. real life approach displays a lot of confidence whereas you do not get this bonus in OLD.
Due to the imbalance an attractive man will settle with a less attractive women in OLD more often than not.

Thuse if you see an attractive man with an unattractive woman -> online dating
unattractive man with attractive woman-> real life dating
CodeGuessr
Given your situation maybe an EV is indeed unworkable for you.

Doesn’t mean it’s the same for everyone else.
> A woman is someone who sees in herself at least one attribute, which she regards as a sufficient condition for her own membership in that category. What that attribute is can vary from woman to woman. Now what is the concession that's being made?

If we had to limit ourselves to that entirely unclear definition we'd be giving up a lot, including the ability to recognize anyone as either man or woman (or even male or female) in cases where they aren't able to communicate to us whatever they've decided using made up attributes they (entirely on their own) deem sufficient to place them in one group or another.

This would include every single non-living person and anyone whose physical or mental limitations prevent them from communicating or inventing that list of arbitrary attributes and then classifying each one themselves according to some unspecified process in order to determine which term should apply to them.

Even just changing the definition from something that was nearly always entirely clear, easy to define objectively, and immutable, to something that is not defined, where the determining criteria can differ from one person to the next, and where the classification for a single person can change from one moment to the next is a major concession that has wide ranging implications.
Most of this gripe is like complaining that a job board is a scam because you haven’t gotten a job you like.

It would be a scam if there were not real women there who were actually seeking dates, if the likes were fake bots or something.

If they’re just choosing other candidates that doesn’t make it a scam.
reposted a few minutes later https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33679806
I'm not sure, just for the fact that the best browser is something that could vary quickly, there might be niches, different native versions...
We were always a zero wing rhapsody household

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qE6emvdmg-M
Define attractiveness please, it is a bit of an ambiguous term.

My definition of attractiveness includes behavior, and the only unattractive behavior that might put your career at risk is if you ask people out in extremely awkward ways or don't handle rejection well.

Otherwise there should be no career risk to stating interest in getting to know a person more that you find interesting.
I think something that could accumulate lead would be highly useful, given we've spent much of the last century indelicately vapourising it over everything.
Exactly!

Also, men have it beat in them by now that approaching women in public is seen as creepy and now all of a sudden we want them to start doing it? There is no magical answer, everyone should try different things and see what works for them.
"'God is dead, God is dead' ...Perdition! When God dies you'll know about it."

I first came across Greg Bear reading his short story Petra in Mirrorshades: The Cyberpunk Anthology[1]. I still have the book and just took that quote from it.

I found it mind bending when I first read it.

As a kid brought up as a Catholic I was told that the world exists because of God never stops thinking about us. Regardless of if we believe in God, God believes in us and that's the important thing.

So teenage me, obsessed with hard SciFi and Cyberpunk in particular, runs bang into Petra.

It's a story about a world where God has died. With no supreme being to hold the world in its mind the rules of reality break down.

It was such a crazy concept and it came just at the right time in my life. As an adult, I no longer believe in the supernatural but I still remember the illicit feeling of reading Petra back when I did and it definitely changed me.

RIP Greg, you were brilliant!

1. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/302702.Mirrorshades
I remember playing soccer with completely smooth rubber balls as a kid, and this effect is definitely noticeable. Feels a bit like kicking a beach ball. It's like they stop in midair.
Then you shouldn't say "at least" half a century. You're scraping unearned points there.
Maybe the set of behaviors the exude at work are attractive to other people they share the workplace with? Especially seeing they already have a big thing in common-place they spend a lot of time at.
He was writing a bit later. Take a look at the Wikipedia article[1] on the "Golden Age" writers - looks like Robert Silverberg is the last of that era still with us.

(Edit: Not to belittle Bear if you grouped him with them on the quality of his writing rather than contemporaneity)

[1]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Age_of_Science_Fictio...
I know a dude who did the drugs part of Steve Jobs. Almost lost his mind, and didn't come out any smarter from that phase.
1970's calling. Been there. Done that: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33517092#33517797
“Anonymous function” simply means no name, that would be equally confusing. For “function objects”, closures may be more than just a nice syntax for it. E.g. two closures may share a symbol:

let x
fn setx(v) {x = v}
fn getx() {return x}

And that symbol still lives in scope:

x = 5; getx() // 5

It may be not the best name, but these nuances beg for a distinct one.
How Is Artificial Intelligence Changing Art History?
It would be a noop. A reader macro that takes a s-expr bounded by parentheses, and returns a s-expr, literally is just the identity function^Hmacro.
But Holmes did not donate hundreds of millions to various groups and definitely did not help launder large amounts of money from war torn country. You have to be connected closer to the swamp to be protected by them.
Why spend the limited internal energy of the Earth's core while the much less limited energy of our star, which is conveniently delivered daily to the surface, where it's easy to harvest?

I can understand geothermal energy in very high latitudes, like they do in Greenland, where Sun energy is scarce, and lava is close to the surface. On most of the earth, geothermal energy is much harder to get than solar.
I do not know anyone who is not attractive at least in some way.
That's a very strange win to take considering the damage Trump did with his Twitter account and could do again if he gets back to it.
> > The point of art art is that it is created by a human or group of humans.

> Not for me as a consumer of art.

There's a sense in which you don't really get to say that.

Artists are the people who define art, much as scientists get to
define what science is.

So if someone said, "The point of science is that it is conducted
according to the principles of reason and scientific method", and you
responded; "Not for me as a consumer of science", then you'd be in a
sticky position.

You could certainly believe that amethyst rays will cure your gout.
But really you'll be a consumer of something else, something that's
not science even if you insist on calling it that.
Thanks for the inspiration. The fact that you've already done it won't stop me.

Got more details/links to study?
PowerDNS Admin Project is looking for new maintainers
In my experience people often refer to those scooters generically as "vespas", even if it's not strictly accurate.

So while no scooter manufacturer would condone the generic use, "electric vespa" might get across what you mean?

Of course then you're stuck talking about Vespa vespas and non-Vespa vespas...
And the less toxic compound is apparently "volatile elemental mercury". Less toxic than dimethylmercury I suppose, but not exactly safe.
Seems to be what's affecting women most of the time.

"You can't be hot and a security specialist!"

Just because the average women takes more care of herself than the average man.
I've always avoided getting involved with anyone at work, because if the relationship goes sour then working at the same company may become very difficult.
> dating apps only have "dating app people" (DAP) on them. This leads to an inherent flaw in dating apps. If all or most of the ideal matches of a person that's on an app are _not_ DAP, well, apps will always be detrimental to that person

Spot on. This self-selection puts me off those.
When he posted it I thought it was pretty cool that he's sitting down with the team and discussing things. This is how Elon learns in an organization. He needs to do this kind of thing and do it a lot more.

I don't think the time of day matters much. I've been in the office at that time of the day a number of times. As long as it's only an occasional thing it's fine.
Hilma af Klint’s family criticises the NFT sale of the artist’s sacred paintings
Somehow I had never heard of him. Any recommendations for where I should start reading?
Relative of Hilma Af Klint Condemns NFT Project
Dang, what is the deal with accounts being unfairly blocked from submitting links? And can mods apply this punishment arbitrarily?

Some accounts are allowed to submit links frequently, even a few minutes between submissions, while other accounts are being blocked from submitting and can only do so once every few or 24 hours. "You're posting too fast. Please slow down. Thanks." Is this some type of new punitive action?

It also looks very unfair, when applied to accounts that are clearly not spammers (and maybe submit a few times in a day or week) or appears as a punitive action because of some difference of opinion with a mod.
Complexity is still O(n) because sizes grow exponentially, so the cost of amortizing rehashes over the number of inserted elements is a constant. Here's a theoretical analysis of this:
https://www.cs.cornell.edu/courses/cs3110/2011sp/Lectures/le...
“And those people should not be listened to who keep saying the voice of the people is the voice of God, since the riotousness of the crowd is always close to insanity.”

I think Musk probably doesn’t believe Vox Populi, Vox Dei either but when it suits his extremely right wing agenda it’s a useful meme to wind everyone up on the left.
Any link to access the book ?
May be I am just too old, but something there smells completely backwards to me.

> When you meet someone through an app you have no loyalty to that person, they don’t know your friends, they don’t work with you, so it’s all too easy for them to not follow up on promises.”

What promises? What promise can make me call a girl if I don’t like her? And what promise can stop me from calling a girl if I’m attracted to her.

>Amy’s right, apps have moved dating from the public into the private sphere and in doing so they have removed any accountability.

Isn’t it backwards? Public scrutiny reduces dates. “She’s older than you! But she’s only 17… She’s too tall. She’s too short. You took them both on the same date?? how was it?”.

My dates are my private business. Friends and family have no say in that. If they try to say something- I’ll leave the room. And so nobody prevents me from dating whom I’m attracted to. Accountability? it reduces dates, no?

>Now we connect with people when we’re shut away at home, under duvets, behind closed doors, which makes it so much easier to behave badly.

One behaves badly when no one sees him?? Well, tbh I sometimes do. But you can’t behave badly towards an attractive girl. It’s both impossible and counterproductive.
VR is tricky. I have my own reasons rooted in personal experience for a bull case of the metaverse. But I'm also confident that it's not going to be a mass market product like the smartphone. And I'm also skeptical that Facebook can pull it off.

So yeah, probably a 20-80 and not a 50-50 bet.
In Denmark many of the networks implement roaming, so you can use your preferred app to pay for most charging.