skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Thanks a lot, that's a very helpful tip. :-) We'll adjust the title for future posts. (And I'll set up such a keyword-based notification for myself. :-)

Sebastian's talk is awesome indeed. I learned a lot from it about how Python works without going too much into the implementation details.
> How do you know the engine won't blow up 5 laps into the race? You objectively can't know, because the only way to find out is to perform extensive testing over a long period of time

Well it's been 6 years since Rust 1.0 was released. And it's had extensive adoption over that time period, including in projects used in vast numbers of devices and services. Firefox runs on Rust, Dropbox runs on Rust, AWS and Cloudflare are both using Rust for core services. Android is shipping Rust. Microsoft is looking at adopting it in Windows. What would count as a long time for you?
Even more than Benedict Arnold, I'd say. And certainly Judas is more well-known world-wide (c.f. Dante).
Twitter down detector shows sudden surge in reported outages
As someone who wants Wikipedia to stop begging me for money it doesn't really need, I want that to be the main complaint here. I don't want it to be about what the Wikimedia Foundation is spending that money on, because suddenly the story becomes a referendum on whether you like the subject of their donations or not. What they're spending on doesn't actually matter very much, and focusing on it turns the issue into a dog whistle. It makes this another battle in the ideological trench warfare we're locked in, where people choose sides not based on what's happening, but on their prior affiliations. Please, when talking about this, just make it about a company that has all the money it needs, but keeps asking you for more, and try as much as you can to leave the politics out of it.
Communication is a skill, and the vast majority of people have not been trained in it.
Short answer: Betteridge's law of headlines does not apply here.

Which is imho actually the expected answer.
Not to mention the terrible conditions that animals are forced to live in and injuries caused by processing (from birth to death) [1] as well as abuse by low-paid workers who are, themselves, working in poor conditions. [2] Factory farming is not clean and free of animal suffering by any means, but most people's experience with animals as food comes in neat, little, clean plastic-wrapped chunks of meat.

1. https://www.ciwf.org.uk/factory-farming/animal-cruelty/
2. https://ffacoalition.org/articles/dangerous-conditions-facto...
“We keep passing unseen through little moments of other people's lives.” -- Robert M Pirsig.
You have to watch it. I read the book too. The movie is not faithful but I liked it as the book.
In English, I've heard something similar used as a cheesy pickup line.
I looked through the linked claim that Wikipedia is biased and it seems like the bias is not putting a particular political agenda front and center. In the example is the Wikipedia article not talking about highly dubious Fox news "scandals" during the Obama presidency; I checked the Donald Trump article and he gets the same treatment.

I like the bias of not treating politics as a set of "scandals" just like the media does. It is likely that being an international effort, the English Wikipedia avoids voting in a particular partisan bias, even if it doesn't appear to be so for other languages.
Can you blame them for not wanting accounts spelling out the N word under every promoted tweet that contained a Black person? Or ranting about sodomites any time they saw a rainbow? Advertisers don't flock to 4chan for a reason.

Conservatives may not like it, but their ideological umbrella encompasses some of the most unsavory characters in our society. I mean, the N word example was a bit harsh but even imagine someone who tries to dress it up with khakis and an oxford shirt like Richard Spencer. Still incredibly off-putting once it becomes overt enough. It's natural that a for-profit company would want to hide these people away.

Also keep in mind that when far left accounts were banned for threatening police officers or something conservatives and libertarians were happy to ignore it. In the end, Twitter was not pushing a hegemonic progressive worldview. They were trying to make money, which is why they happily forced Musk to buy them in the first place. If they were just wanting to propagandize people to be Demonrats or whatever then they would not have sold with such zeal for $54.20....
So the stock photo for "processed food" in MSM reports seems to be a picture of a hamburger. As far as I'm aware, the only processed things in a hamburger are the bun and the cheese. Oh - maybe the secret sauce; but I tell them to hold the cheese and sauce.

For me, processed meat means rubbery hotdog sausages; reconstituted chicken meat; doner kebab; TV dinners; fishcakes, and so on. [Edit: ham and bacon, of course, but only a crazy person eats a quarter-pound of bacon.] I imagine some of those are fine, but if you can't see the unprocessed ingredient, then the 'Lemon Market' rule says it's probably not what it's supposed to be.
Huh, TIL that what I always called a pickaxe is actually called a mattock.
Generally when people talk about the negatives of processed food, they mean either:

1. Something that was originally nutritious, but had some part removed due to processing. Sometimes they attempt to add vitamins back into it, like enriched flour, but the issue is that we don’t know what else might be missing, or how changing the structure affects the body (faster absorbing carbs for example)

2. Foods that are sanitized heavily. Obviously it’s in the name of safety, but there could be benefits to eating a little dirt sometimes (ie there’s tons of vitamin B12 in dirt, but who knows what else we could be missing)

3. Foods that have lots of artificial or derived chemicals. Many are probably fine but it’s hard to know how certain things affect our gut microbiome.

There’s so much we still don’t understand about our bodies, especially our gut and it’s bacteria. That’s why nutrition science changes constantly. “Fat is bad, no wait it’s good” etc.

It’s not entirely scientific, but I strongly recommend reading In Defense Of Food. It’s thought-provoking and hits heavily on the many inconsistencies in our primitive understanding of nutrition. The author also calls out interesting points about “whole unprocessed foods” and why nutrition science is hard (eg too many variables)
yeah but only recently offered an alternative charging method (magsafe) along with USB-C
Possibility? Will they start eating grass instead?
Michael Pollan said it best: “Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants.”
It gets far worse if it is not an ODE, but a PDE, there a uniqueness criteria is somewhere between "for this PDE in this extremely special case with these extra assumptions ..." up to "?????".
Island influence stops at the water. Yes, you might get quite famous on your own island, and if that's what you're going for, power to you. Everything from mailing lists to mastodon will do that for you. But if you want to reach "everyone", you need a network that will potentially broadcast to "everyone". Should you want to reach "everyone"? Very different question, but that's not the issue raised. The upside to users on a centralised platform is that their potential reach is that entire platform's user base. The exact same is true for any other platform, but the numbers differ by orders of magnitude, and as we all know: bigger number must be better.
Using the word “canned” is meaningless.

Canned sardines/mackerel is super healthy and minimally processed. Just like canned beans, canned tomatoes, canned corn..etc
While I agree with both quotes separately, I don't think that they necessarily mean the same thing.

To me, the first (by Brooks) seems to be about grasping the domain model to understand what the system does (or can do) in general.

Wheras the second (by Torvalds) seems to be about how best to organize data in code for efficient processing. Array, hash, tree, heap, etc and their associated access time complexity. The efficiency of your solution depends on your choice of a data structure that fits the local problem.
Thought it would be Benedict Arnold for the US. Is Judas not considered a betrayer in Christian communities outside the US? Seems weird to connect Judas uniquely to American culture.
That number is probably true for the USA only. GP specifically said:

> Much of the world does not dump fertilizer on land, grow crop, and feed it to cattle.
In practice people seem to use “u” instead
"The ALAN Parsers Project"

Bravo! Best wordplay I've reaed today.
I don't have target to convince you, I just share you truth.

But sure, you could use garbage sources, and feed mind with infogarbage, if you wish.

And unfortunately, you behave rude, so I will not continue talk in this style, until you will answer my questions.
have you read the article you linked? this literally repeats the same points I made, I don’t understand what you were trying to say.
Ask HN: Deployment Standards for K8s Apps?
Hi,

I'm a bit out of the loop on this, but can someone share any information they might have on how Kubernetes orchestrated apps are typically deployed? We do quite a bit of B2B sales and have built a number of docker containers which do various things. We deploy these internally to our own environment via terraform scripts. We are now playing around with the idea of sharing this app with other customers (on-premise installs) and need some guidance.

Is there a standard that people follow/IT people expect to see for deployment of these types of apps? What is realistic of us to ask our customers to do when installing our application on their own servers? Some of these users might not even have a Kubernetes environment setup in their cloud/servers.

Thanks
Also, key changes are actually pretty common in hip hop. Its a really really common technique to shift everything down a half step at some point in the song or to do a tape slowdown effect which pitches everything down. Not technically a "key change" but effectively the same thing.
Having used svn, git, mercurial then back to git (with the last two at the same job, the business unit having decided to move from mercurial to a git-based solution) and I've preferred mercurial to git, where it feels like there's more possible foot-guns and its features don't bring enough value to justify the increased complexity when using it .
> A language where you need to constantly write wrappers around everything just to get basic functionality is quite a miserable language, imho. That's like C…

Which makes complete sense, since Go was designed as Google's C for Dummies.
I don't care if it isn't the American way. This is an economic cold war. China views all trade as a zero-sum-game war, and currently, we've ceded the fight completely. They can collect info and revenue in our markets, but we can't in theirs. If appeasing them is how we decide to continue, we've lost the fight and will continue to lose the fight.

Remember, to the Chinese government, a Win-Win situation is not when both parties walk away happy, it's when the Chinese side wins twice.
Peanuts are not seeds. I don't know whether it counts (and I don't know why GP thinks seeds are to be avoided).
I’ve got a two week visit end of Feb and the prices for hotels alone are pretty surprising.
10 days later:

"Tragically wrong" is an understatement; monstrously wrong may do it justice...
They are still faking it and haven't made it yet.

Takes about 15-30 seconds to figure out if the person you are talking to understands or is being evasive. In which case you need to adjust and put on kiddy gloves, slow down, and coax information out.
I must correct myself: Jelly Roll Morton is in the "Early Influences" section of the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.

Jay-Z, on the other hand, is in the main category.
We really should have some sort of reciprocity with China by now. Frame it however you want, don't mention China specifically in the bill, etc. But they are no longer a developing nation, they are the largest or second largest economy and military power in the world, and are advancing a set of totalitarian values completely antithetical to what the US and our democratic allies have been fighting for (literally and figuratively) since WWII at least.

If US social media, search, and other internet companies are banned in China, then similar Chinese companies should be banned in the US. If US companies can't operate in China except through a joint venture with a Chinese company, to which the US company must transfer its technology to, then same should apply to Chinese companies operating in the US. Etc.

It should be clear at this point that negotiations with China won't change anything internally in China. The only option is for the US to do what is in its power to within the US (and perhaps with fellow democratic allies). Aka reciprocity.

Reasons for banning Chinese social media particularly: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33657429
If You Think Straight, You Can Speak Straight [1]

“If a man writes and speaks "neatly" it is because his thinking is orderly; if his expression is forceful, the thought back of it must be forceful. But if he blunders for words, and uses phrases which express his meaning clumsily, I believe his mind is cluttered and ill-disciplined.”

[1] https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Why_I_Never_Hire_Brilliant_Me...
It would be equally simple for a few citizens of [insert targeted country] to contest the claims that it is linked with [insert pejorative Y].

The open nature of the encyclopedia means that there is at the very least a record of the controversy and in general a countervailing force against such distortions. While an open project like Wikipedia is more vulnerable to this type of attack it is also more resilient to this style of attack but the exact same reasons.
The ACM recorded this 2-hour long interview[0] with Fred that walks through his whole history. It's incredible to see Fred's ability to recall conversations and technical decisions from over 50 years ago!

I admire his ability to move back and forth between industry and academia and move the entire field forward.

One of my favorite quotes: "A scientist builds in order to learn. An engineer learns in order to build."

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ul0dbgs8Mdk
I read an article the other day that argued that TikTok should not be banned on the basis of free speech. The argument is, while American's have the freedom to say whatever the hell we want, we have an arguably even more freedom when it comes to what we consume, with only very select content (CSAM for example) being illegal to consume.

Yes there might be targeted misinformation there, but it's up to individual Americans to decide if they want to consume that content, government should not be in the business of curating content.
Payroll and Taxes aren't "Hardcore"
https://youtu.be/Cfk2IXlZdbI

“How Its Made - Canola Oil”

This was all I needed to see to know I don’t want to consume it ever again.
> Nature has a way of limiting how much of a certain substance you can consume.

Is your belief that "Nature" is an actor which can (intentionally or unintentionally) limit human consumption? Or are you saying something more like: "there's a physical limit to how much air a human can breathe in a day"?
>> Isn’t USB-C at high power kind of expensive per watt?

I don't think it's too expensive if you consider the environment impact not to mention the bad user experience caused by multiple chargers. I also believe at certain point the economies of scale should make it less expensive.
The point of bacon is that it’s cured. Otherwise it’s pork belly.
Weird:

> https://usma.org/laws-and-bills/metric-conversion-act-of-197...

> https://usma.org/laws-and-bills/executive-order-12770

The US government hasn't been great in converting US industry to metric. But ... it's a bit disingenuous to say we didn't even try.
Strong sandboxing, yes. But I'd especially appreciate it if it was wrapped up in an interface like Sandstorm.io.

I want to teach something like Tailscale about my contacts, so they are allowed to communicate with my services (through their services).

Then I want to run an app inside a strong sanbox that has capability-based APIs to do things kind of like ZeroMQ for sending messages TO THE CONTACTS. I don't want the API to look like a tcp/ip or udp connection. I want the app to think it's sending a message to a contact I've given it permission to talk to.

If this was running in a strong sandbox, I think this would be an awesome way to develop and use simple federated apps. If something like Mastodon existed on top of this, I'd think it would be really secure and much easier to tell people to stand up their own node...
GML: Create Cross-Platform Video Games in GameMaker Studio
Unfortunately food is religion to many folks. They will die defending their precious food choices.

The problem with articles like this is that it’s designed to be an echo chamber of denialism.

The key to being healthy is good diet. Good diet means good ingredients. Most animals are treated like crap and fed crap too—save for a few small-scale producers.

If you want to eat meat do yourself (and everyone having to hear these discussions) a favor: visit a high quality Kobe cattle ranch and see how they treat the animals.

Then visit a large-scale farm (tip: you might need top-secret clearance) which provides the majority of beef products to the USA.

Compare the difference…

Garbage in = garbage out.
Feel free to elaborate on this cryptic comment
Or, you just have anxiety when being put on the spot to explain things.
I use AnyDesk [0] to connect to my Linux media centre from OSX*. That's not headless though, so not sure if it would work for you

*Actually "used". It no longer works since I switched from Ubuntu to Manjaro

[0] https://anydesk.com/gb
I don't understand. Is that thing from fiction, real or both?
The thing that shocks me is that anyone still trusts any of these exchanges except maybe Coinbase. I just heard the Kraken CEO in an interview touting his "partial balance sheet audit" for 2021. The interviewer asked if Kraken would have a full balance sheet audit (proving reserves) this year.

The CEO couldn't commit to a timeline for a full audit (ie not in 2022) but pointed out reserves were just "one component" of protecting customer's assets. That's like a captain saying that he wasn't going to check if there is a hole in the boat because hull integrity is just one component of a ship's voyage.

And on Reddit people seem to think Kraken is very dependable.
More like a complex concept who can't be reduced to white and black. Sausages are processed, but there's a big difference between chorizo and Oscar Mayer. Powdered milk is processed, but yogurt and cheeses are too. Even cooking is significant processing that actually makes food safer and more nutritious.
Right wing views are objectively censored on social media and Wikipedia. “Idiotic rants” are valid free speech and censorship of profanity is a deflection.
Only if you pretend insects and rodents don't count as living beings.
Yes but which 50% left matters. Engineers in a big complicated system like that are NOT replaceable and NOBODY properly manages their bus-factor. If you spent the past five years basically babying the twitter infra and making sure it stays working and understanding it and building on it and convincing yourself at night that it's okay how stupid and poorly engineered it is because it gets the job done and now elon comes in and spends his time calling you incompetent and overpaid and offers you a 3 month severance, you aren't staying.
Affecting sleep != Losing sleep
TikTok is hitting a much broader slice of the US population, and getting a much broader slice of political opinions. And it's connecting all these people and all these opinions. You can find communists and nazi's on TikTok, building communities, and getting their voice out.

The administration hates TikTok because it is potentially destabilizing. The FBI's concern is not that it's foreign influence, but that it's allowing internal movements to gain traction. Just as the FBI suppressed internal movements throughout the 20th century they want to suppress this new medium that may threaten the status quo.

Now I don't want to see the US fall into chaos, but neither do I want to see a world where political change is stifled, which is what the FBI wants to do here.
Clear communication requires a certain amount of skill (at communicating), and that you actually understand the thing that you're communicating. Neither of these is quite as common as one might hope.
Sure, but that has to be temporary.

There are good eyeballs for sale, and someone will buy them.

It might take some time to shift over to a new advertiser cohort.
I read a thread from someone reviewing the books, showing all the issues. One conclusion was, “where did all the actual money they took in from people go? It’s missing as an asset.”

And I wonder if they’ve been hacked or otherwise extorted one or more times.
Musk has also been lying about his college degrees. He has no STEM degree at all

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33651188
Speech is a reflection of thought. If a person does not think clearly, that person cannot communicate clearly.

The opposite is often (but not always) true. If a person does not communicate clearly, it is usually because they cannot think clearly (at least about that particular topic).
> Somewhere, else you risk not knowing that a change to ConcreteType broke is implementation of IfaceType in a way that you might not know about until a rare runtime code path is executed.

Why would runtime be involved? Surely if ConcreteType doesn't satisfy the interface anymore then the compiler will catch that at any site where a ConcreteType is being used as / cast to an IfaceType?

Or are you talking about iface->iface side-cast?
It seems like you may fundamentally agree with the person you are replying to. The person who is forgiven may feel they need to know they are forgiven, but that doesn't mean they actually do. Your example of someone who really wants reconciliation, and has confused it with forgiveness, seems like a good case of someone not actually needing to know they are forgiven, because it's not what they really want or care about anyway.
Lots of people are afraid to say "I don't know" in my experience. Although, sometimes people ask me a question where I have to work out in my head what the answer is and it feels weird to sit there in silence for 15 seconds as I do so.
“No added nitrates” usually means celery extract. (Ie nitrates)
For frying, I usually use a mixture of olive oil and butter. The oil slows down the process of the butter burning. It's certainly not as good as ghee, but ghee tends to make stuff greasy.
I like the fact that it's 10^3.
_Unprocessed_ red meat. The study is very specific about this.
That's true on the current margin in the US but only on the current margin. Creating one more pound of beef than we currently do does require a lot of farmed soy and other crops and ends up very inefficient. But there's also a lot of grazing land in the US that can't be used for intensive agriculture and provides a lot environmentally "free" (minus methane emissions) meat. From an environmental standpoint we want to halve or so the amount of beef we consume, not eliminate it entirely.

And other countries than the US are operating on differnet margins.
Users don't want convoluted nonsense like Mastodon. They want a one-click sign up and ease of use.
> The encyclopedia is giant and highly decentralized.

At least in Germany it's highly centralized for any topic that is even slightly political. I forgot the exact percentage, but it's in the realm of 95%+ is editted by a few dozen people for all topics that are even slightly political and spreads a numbers of expertises they seemingly have.

Most German Wikipedians probably know Felikz and Kopilot or the Politburo of Wikipedia in general.

edit: It's Kopilot not Copilot.