skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
this is about the launch of Artemis I, an unmanned test of a moon mission. https://www.nasa.gov/feature/around-the-moon-with-nasa-s-fir...
Sure, one could and does say that, I'm just making a claim that we have to differentiate this better, not for being terminological pedants but because all the crashes of centralized exchanges will be used to regulate decentralized crypto while only allowing of centralized exchanges ...
I'm not sure if we were watching the same livestream, but the official launch livestream was incredibly high-budget and high production values. Felt like you were watching a trailer for Top Gun or Interstellar. It's really funny to me that SpaceX fanboys can't set aside their polemics against SLS for five seconds despite a pitch-perfect launch while Starship fumbles about with inordinate delays and cost overruns -- the exact same thing SLS is most criticized for.
Fever dream, and yes, since Tom Mueller left their ability to build reliable engines has declined substantially. Elon's inflating ego is going to get him burned. Unfortunately he's not a reliable road to the Moon and Mars.
What was FTXs market cap a month ago?
The thing is, the quality is not that high and the look not that great. It's just extremely well known and you people know what they are getting. If you know where to look and especially if you are willing to go online, you can het the same quality and look for half or a third of the price.
Starship is fully reusable so it will cost a small fraction of falcon heavy to send a much bigger payload.
The cost of sending a payload to orbit will plummet once starship is operative.
More importantly Falcon Heavy uses the Merlin engines and runs on RP-1. So, unlike methane, it cannot be produced on Mars.
And on Comcast it still somehow maxes out at a 35 Mbps upload
Not really sure economics agrees with you there.

Edit: to be clear, I’m not suggesting the business model/treatment of ‘contractors’ is ethical, but fewer companies will not solve that, regulation will.
Cut Elon some slack: SLS was supposed to launch in 2016, so it was 6 years behind schedule.
You mean like JMAP?
There is always too sides to a story. We don't know what pressures the FB engineers were under and the problems they were trying to solve resulting in them "demanding" changes. In the end I think everyone wins with the forking.
They're not withholding the tips, they're just handing everything to administrators who will deal with the debts of the company as must be done under the law. The alternative would prejudice any secured creditors, who are afforded preferential treatment in the winding up of a company and its assets. Most companies that enter administration have (at best) a small amount of cash, a large amount of debt, and little revenue. If you are still solvent and trading you can pay off your debts in the order you choose, like paying your drivers what you owe them as those debts arise even if you have to restructure larger debts (on the basis of your prospective revenue) to do it; if you cease to be solvent or cease to trade, you must pay them off according to the rules of winding-up.

Given that it's voluntary administration and not forced, I would expect a lot of the regular creditors (including drivers) to be paid to some degree, as Deliveroo Australia probably still has some cash. But they can't just predict that to be the case and distribute the company's assets on that expectation. Administration means handing it all over and wiping your hands clean. Whatever's there will make it to whoever is owed money if the company has the assets.
And in the case of the engines, once those existing engines are used, Aerojet Rocketdyne has to spin up a new assembly line, and they are essentially a sole source contractor, so they can charge nearly whatever they want.

So what started out as a grand idea to reuse old Shuttle hardware ends up with Aerojet Rocketdyne charging $146 million per engine. Each. And there are four of them.
SpaceX wouldn't exist without US government funding.
"...NASA awarded the first Commercial Resupply Services (CRS) contract to SpaceX in December (2008), thus financially saving the company." Give the bureaucrats some credit.
Shouldn't Z be greater than 1? Or else you're guaranteed screwed when the market turns. But then I guess that's what happened here.
Don't most of the riders work with multiple apps anyway? Here in the UK it's not unusual for your Uber Eats order to be delivered by a guy with a Deliveroo jacket/bag, or vice-versa.
Reddit Video Downloader – Download Reddit Videos with Sound
You may want to wait for some time to check if it reoccurs.
Several users reported initially that it fixed the problem but later realized it was only a momentary fix.
World Cup 2022 in JSON
Makes sense. The print is way finer.
I wonder if the people who just lost their jobs feel relieved that their exploitation has ended…?
I think what you described is leverage.

You own an asset worth $100. You give away your asset as collateral to borrow $90. You buy more of that asset for $90. You give away your asset as collateral to borrow $80. You buy more of that asset for $80. Now, if the asset goes up/down in value, you earn/loose as much as if you invested $270 into that asset. Even though you only invested $100. The downside is that you have to pay fees to the lending service. And that you are exposed to counterparty risk.
Seems like it just the client component for now
It's global thermonuclear war. There won't be internet, cell reception, or even a power grid.

The radio in those is pretty short distance (ham can do 1000s of Km) and they draw a lot of power that you'll want to save since (if you're lucky) you'll be running on car batteries in remote areas.

But now I'm wondering how the aftermath will affect propagation conditions.
Saying anyone is "responsible" for a suicide is disingenuous
Considering the way it works, where your "twitter handle" is defined by the server, and I assume thus locked to it, I'd probably consider running my own instance if I wanted to use it for something serious.

I actually do think the federated version of Twitter, where organisations run their own "Twitter" which then connects to the rest of the "Twitters" is a solid foundation to build an internet that is not too reliant on massive advertisement corporations. I'm European and I did spend a decade in our public sector, but I think there is just something fundamentally wrong with Danish politicians being on Twitter or Facebook instead of being on something like a Mastodon server operated by the Danish state, and I frankly think the same for media organisations like our news papers. They'd be much better off in the federated version of Twitter.

The downside is of course that it's not easy. I looked into a few servers for Mastodon, and the one I liked the most would cost me a monthly fee of €1 with all profits going to planting trees. Which is nice and all, but looking into the "organisation" behind it, well... Most servers seem to be run by just a few people, who aren't really accountable. This is probably going to be just fine. It works pretty well for Open Source Software, but here you can't fork projects when their operators lose interest, and it seems like sort of a design flaw to have your "twitter handle" tied into something you still have no real control over unless you operate your own Mastodon instance or join one of the ones that are operated by real world organisations that you trust.
How does that square with the readme?

> For development, DuckDB requires CMake, Python3 and a C++11 compliant compiler.

I guess they mean libraries? But specifying for compilation implies to me they wrote their own compiler or something strange.
It's interesting to see more people embracing the patch-stack workflow! For those interested in using the patch-stack workflow, but not ready to change to sapling, git patch stack would be worth checking out.

https://git-ps.sh/
Not necessarily... R&D is expensive regardless and SLS won't have as many launches to amortize across
The price could remain constant after the second time A sells to B. Their wealth still has increased, hence demonstrating it's not a zero-sum game (let alone negative-sum).

Some things that are actually zero-sum games are futures or options markets.
Effective altruism is about the _effective_ part. Don't just donate to the charity or cause that _sounds_ good; look for where your money would provide the biggest impact.

If you want to save lives in general, look for the most _effective_ charity like that, which may be something like mosquito nets rather than a cancer research foundation. Don't just donate money to whatever is the most obvious charity advertised on television.

If you had a family member with cancer, look at which of N cancer foundations spend the money most effectively and donate there.

Often, altruism comes down to people giving money to the 'obvious' causes, which don't necessarily use the money effectively.
I find it interesting that the cities of the Indus Valley Civilization had sewage systems and most of the houses had toilets.

This knowledge seems to have gotten lost with the decline of their civilization. Some time the Indus Valley Civilization disappeared, some of their cities got reinhabited by other peoples, but they didn't use the sewage system and apparently didn't figure out what it was.
The SLS is not $3b per rocket. Those numbers, just like the numbers everyone trotted out for the Space Shuttle, are NASA's manned spaceflight budget divided by the number of launches per year.

It's not an accurate cost for the SLS, you don't come up with the cost of a SpaceX launch by taking into consideration their whole operating budget. Even your Starship cost is inaccurate by half, a single Starship launch can only get it to low Earth orbit with just enough fuel to land. To get anywhere interesting a Starship needs to refuel in-orbit, a capability SpaceX has yet to demonstrate even at the small scale. So every Starship launch needs a second buddy launch to refuel in orbit.

The SLS is not a perfect launch system but it's actually flying right now. Starship is still years out and requires unproven and as-yet undeveloped technology. It'll be interesting when it flies but it's a lot of undelivered promises at the moment.
Suffragette Bombing and Arson Campaign
It seems like suggesting there is _no such threshold_ is even more in need of citation.

Boundlessness means that X could be all domesticated animals, and Y=1 human. Surely that seems like not the right call, given that it would ultimately kill even more humans.
I'm talking about the available commands, the UI is purposefully minimal.
There are Mesopotamian records that refer to various parallel states. But it's not easy to prove that a particular name refers to a particular area.

(If I'm remembering correctly, we do suspect a particular group mentioned in Mesopotamian records of being Harappan. It's still impossible to prove; you'd want a lot more evidence than "we think it was these guys" before renaming the culture. There is also no particular reason to believe that the Sumerian word for Harappans was related to the Harappan word for themselves.)

EDIT: found it - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meluhha
I was surprised they didn't show any view from on-board cameras. Even on later Shuttle launches they had cameras on the solid rocket boosters and the external tank.

The stream did show a heavily corrupted video for a few moments that could have been from the rocket. So I guess they had cameras, but maybe had problems receiving the signal from them.
Buddhist art frequently uses mandalas as a design motif. They were invented in India in the first century B.C., but Hindu home designs frequently feature them as well. Today you will be going to know how Mandala Art could decorate your home like never before in ‘Murtaza Hashwani Artwork’ blog.
I don't see why the git way is problematic. It means someone is verifiably taking responsibility for all changes. That applies to conflicts and reading as much as normal commits.

Edit: I'm not saying there's not a better way, just that I don't understand the problem with git.
Nothing is stopping you from deleting processed audio and text.
With a lag.

I think that while there is a recording it does not mean you will remember and access is. E.g. I have folders of my high school math but will likely never consult them for an actual day problem, only for remembering/reminiscing.
I live in Israel, and all it takes is a few swipes to switch to palestine tiktok, its pretty wild, I have 'switched side' several times already to see whats up.
He also sued to retroactively be called the 'founder' because as his Twitter antics have shown, his ego is truly boundless
The parent comment is talking about people with personality disorders like narcissism.
Based on decades of experience, I do not agree one bit.

Pro Tools isn't the only DAW game in town, in fact its not even the most commonly used any more and its also not the 'best' DAW for many jobs - merely the most entrenched in peoples minds as a "pro tool".

So many producers are giving it up for cheaper and more effective tools such as REAPER, which not only runs circles around Pro Tools but also runs really, really great on Linux. As does Ardour, which is easily in the same class of any of the other DAW's in terms of capabilities. See also, Waveform, Zrythmn, Qtractor and MusE.

As does BitWig Studio - an Ableton Live analog, arguably more powerful and feature-rich than Ableton Live, which makes sense as it is being built by ex-Ableton folks.

FL Studio? LMMS! Renoise!

Linux Audio really rocks.

Not to mention: ZynthianOS! Oh my! Monome NORNS! Holy heck!

>one major DAW

Sorry, no, this is wrong. REAPER is a major DAW, runs natively. Same with BitWig, Ardour and Harrison Mixbus. So thats at least 4. [1]

>very few plugins

I challenge you to actually install Ubuntu Studio and repeat this claim. Plus, VST plugins run great under Ubuntu Studio. You should probably try it again and update your understanding of the scene - you might've had a point 10 years ago, but as of today: just no. Linux audio is amazing.

>I still think Linux audio is a disaster.

I think you don't have enough modern experience to make this claim. My Presonus-based Ubuntu Studio DAW is the lowest latency, easiest to use and set up DAW in the studio. While the other producers are cussing through the hoops of eLicense and dongle management and unsigned/outdated kext's for super-expensive boutique/cocktail hardware, the Linux DAW users in my studio are happily whistling through the edits with their USB and Firewire-based audio i/o devices, many of which work quite happily 'out of the box', "apt update && apt upgrade" dilemma notwithstanding ..

[1] - If these DAW's can do it, there is technically no reason the other DAW's can't - its just the fixed idea that "linux audio sucks" that prevents this from happening in the industry.

Linux audio does not, in reality, suck - it actually ROCKS, hard. Linux audio only sucks if you say it does.

There are certainly no valid technical reasons for a lack of ports from the market-mindset vendors .. just the mindset you proffer, which is, imho, plain wrong.
Or because the best way to exchange information and improve knowledge and skills and processes at a corporate level is to precisely exchange people with other companies.
Yea the whole magenta-orange theme is extremely cliche and does not sit with the legendary worm logo. Looks like a cheap SaaS startup presentation.

NASA needs a better brand management team with swift authority to demand sub teams to abide by the identity standards.
Iran and China Use Private Detectives to Spy on Dissidents in America
I don't have the feeling the criticism in this thread is directed at a specific organization. The top negative comment refers to the name "effective altruism", and most comments are pretty general.
> and constantly snatches posts I'm looking at away from me in my timeline mid-scroll

Instagram and Reddit do this too, it's the most annoying thing in the world. And making the feed crap is actively harder than just leaving it as it is.
Tim Dodd's 4k 120fps tracking shots are amazing.

Can't do a timestamp yet as it's still live but it's obviously towards the end. Look for the Replay overlay on lower left.

https://youtu.be/FbX2VuOwJGk

edit with timestamps:

Tracking wide slow motion: https://youtu.be/FbX2VuOwJGk?t=29944

Tracking zoom: https://youtu.be/FbX2VuOwJGk?t=30547

These zoom shots are really freakin cool.
Correct. It's a way to either spend your gains or move them into a different crypto/asset while deferring what would otherwise be a taxable event.
Those engines were designed to be re-usable and each were used on multiple Space Shuttle flights. Besides the huge cost, it seems super wasteful to be strapping them on to an expendable rocket!
"Doing good better" was the book title, and I think better defines the goal well. Not perfect, better.

The choices that people make with giving often have no framework for deciding good, let alone better. The moral question is not is X better than Y, but what of all the choices I am going to make can I make better?

If everyone made better choices, not perfect just better, there is a LOT we could improve.
Ok, we've changed to that from https://riders.deliveroo.com.au/en/news/20221116. Good third-party reporting is preferable to corporate press releases: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&sor....

Thanks!
TerminusDB is written in Prolog, pretty cool. See eg https://github.com/terminusdb/terminusdb/blob/main/src/core/...
You’re missing the key piece: we can still spend the money on NASA programs but demand 10x more productivity and cost reduction of their vehicles. Let’s see them turn on a dime and out compete any private venture.

So all points still stand: money goes into the economy and jobs, but the workforce becomes more competent, cost aware and sharp.
I am not an effective altruist: Morality is not a market
See this thread:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33619806

It already launched at 1:47 a.m. EST
That is actually a very good idea. I am pretty certain that I will love it. The main feature drawing me in is the screen on the back, which will keep me from constantly looking at pictures right after I have taken them.
Does Facebook/Meta still use Phabricator internally?
PHP Config load, management, get, set and more
PHP Config load, management, get, set and more. Supports INI,JSON,YAML,TOML,NEON,PHP format file
Everything digital just feels like modern day "content". Long live the physical I say.
There's a similar saying in Chinese 草台班子

it means organizations are basically makeshift.
Two issues:

1. You could retroactively sign something with an expired key and rewrite history

2. The one doing the conflict resolution signs the whole merge commit, but didn't author the stuff they're signing.
First a disclaimer: I am not a part of EA community, but I have met several people from this community. And I am loosely connected to rationalists community. I find EA concept appealing and I think I should allocate some of my resources to help this movement.

Indeed my wording was too broad and over-compassing. Effective altruism was kick started from comparison of different organizations collecting money for whatever altruistic means. And comparison showed that these initiatives are vastly different in effectiveness which prompted an idea that we should take into account effectiveness of particular initiative before giving it money.

EA seems to focus on reducing suffering over improving happiness. Giving a hand to a stranger who have stumbled and have fallen to the ground near you is out of the scope: EA is about strategic long lasting calculated stuff.
> or the benefit of humanity it is unfortunate that the SLS did not blow up on the launchpad

This is genuinely one of the most vile and disgusting things I've read on this thread so far. Cheering on the hypothetical destruction of people's hard work to create a significant engineering and technological milestone is so fundamentally antithetical to the hacker ethos that I can't believe you found it acceptable to put that into writing in such a crass manner.

> Imagine what SpaceX could have produced for $21b

Considering the vast majority of SpaceX's technical achievements are built on the back of the American taxpayer (through use of public-domain NASA documentation and blueprints as well as government contracts), likely not much. As I've said elsewhere in this thread, SpaceX's strengths lie in their crack team of software engineers for which you can credit their advances in reusability, not necessarily their hardware.

It's extremely tiresome to see individuals so cynical that their bias against government-funded research and technology manifests in such an ugly way, especially against the backdrop of such a magnificent success story despite overwhelming odds. Good night.
If we start having that conversation, we should start with big-item parts of the budget, e.g. the military.
Government's role is more than just launching rockets at the lowest price point. People deride pork barrel politics and contracts going all over America, but supporting communities is part of the mandate of a government. NASA funding is also partially possible, as politicians can say it is supporting jobs. If they couldn't justify it like that, NASA funding would be a lot less.
It's almost like humans have a tendency to come to an agreement about what is acceptable speech and what is not and to want these rules enforced.

Like when you go into a pub and start yelling insults at the guests, the patron will "censor" you by throwing your out of their private locality.
If you go under "Unreal Estate", they're selling NFT's of the gigaturtle's various accommodations, and say they plan to expand into the metaverse (there's a countdown timer to release!), where they'll do more of the same. The NFT's (of which it doesn't look like many have sold) will fund Meta development, and the El Dorado that is Meta will open the floodgates and generate enough dough to start actual planning...

It's a freakin' gigaturtle folks! There are reasons why real ships don't look like this. Ever. It's exceedingly unlikely that the makers of this site are serious about anything other than selling NFT's and maybe testing the waters with Meta.
Actually, it's pretty inefficient as a storage solution. There are far better storage systems that loose far less energy.

Efficiency is important if the input (energy) is not free. That's why hydrogen based transport is a non starter because it costs about 3-5x the amount of energy.

The other problem with hydrogen is that both storing and transporting it are hard problems. A lot of it just boils off. It takes up a lot of space. Compressing it to 600bar takes up a lot of energy and requires some heavy duty equipment. Etc. Most hydrogen that is currently produced is used on site and not stored/transported.
Cool cool site!

If you are looking for more. - Chicago jazz - College of DuPage, in Glen Ellyn, Il wdcb.org
lol, the deep cut on the logic. Unfortunately, no, I mean that the person is being irrational in their standard of proof.
The silver lining is that, presumably, if you deposited $100 of crypto into SALT in order to borrow $90, and then invested that $90 in other goods/services/crypto, you probably have the $90 worth of crypto?

I mean, hopefully you didn't send the $90 to FTX to buy and hold crypto there. If you were holding it in your own wallet, then you sortof only lost the $10 in margin cushion?
Gzip is not a container format. Pkzip is far more flexible.
The Falcon 9 booster landing also borrowed a lot from DC-X development.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_DC-X
Because you’ve done better, right?
irrelevant, if the business is unsustainable following the laws and practices of Australia then it should not exist.

We have a social safety net and a hot job market, there will be other better employers available.