skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
git reset HEAD@{1} should do the trick to "uncommit" and keep uncommitted changes in the absence of conflicts. (I may be missing some edge cases.) It does however unstage changes.
Nowadays European kings get a salary of a few million. Its actually bizarre how poor the kings of Sweden or the Netherlands are compared to their counterparts in Brunei or Saudi Arabia.

Constitutional monarchy sucks.
That seems like a good way to "save face" for Putin actually. Kind of clever in a devious sort of way.
Jeff Bezos to Give Most of His Money to Charity
I vote for this mysterious month of Duodecember to remain standing.
I think you're missing the point here. I'm not saying it isn't fraud, I'm just saying that in this case, the complexity doesn't have anything to do with it.
If this kind of stuff piques your interest, I highly recommend Barbara Tuchman's A Distant Mirror: The Calamitous 14th Century. Although it covers a slightly later period, Tuchman goes into fascinating detail about the minutia of daily life, which from our perspective are both familiar and utterly alien.
I have this exact worry as a dad of a seven day old.

During pregnancy, my wife and I read various new parent books out loud to each other. The plan is to continue that with baby. Maybe she’ll associate the Kindle with reading, but my dad collects books, so I grew up absolutely surrounded by them. If he just had a big kindle library, not sure it would have had an effect
It's a moral distinction that the US constitution agrees with, as it says:

"The Congress shall have Power [...] to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries."

With emphasis on "limited times". The original period was 14 years. The current standard of author's lifetime plus 70 years is technically a limit, but seems against the intent of the law.
I would not equate suggesting that there is an absurdity about having the opinion that publicly shitting on your CEO (any CEO at any company) should not get you fired with defending Elon.
I mostly agree. I'm at a point now where it's hard to believe that I could ever find a gig in my [broad] industry that has a balance that benefits my home life as much (100% remote, flexible schedule, great supervisor, low stress work, slow paced). However, it absolutely bores me to tears. It's quite literally the "dream job" that I had always imagined - I can play video games all day if I'd like, go fishing for half an hour here and there in the neighborhood lake, etc. - but I really want challenge again. I would almost guarantee that I'm going to have to give up a lot of those "freedoms" to get that 8hours of challenge back into my life.

From here, my worry is the regret when it almost inevitably affects my home and family time in a negative light. When I miss that baseball game later down the road or am on a "business trip" for a family event that I most certainly wouldn't ever have to do in the position that I am in now, it'll likely make me 'kick myself' for not keeping this position.
There is free movement of people around both islands [1].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Travel_Area
Someone got visited by 3 ghosts last night.

(not original to me, imgur)
It's pretty not-dead for me, as there has been a recent trend to call out the notion of "pulling yourself up by your bootstraps" as a fantasy, in a similar vein as calling out the notion of being "self-made" as unlikely -- i.e., virtually everyone got where they are with some help, not by themselves.

Of course, the computer metaphor involves electronics that do, in fact, figure out how to start without external assistance, despite the human metaphor tending to be a myth!
If research comes out that puberty blockers are too dangerous to be prescribed to transgender children, then the ethical alternative is not to make them wait until adulthood, but to let them start hormone replacement therapy immediately. I think that's something a lot of people don't get.

Trans people consistently describe going through puberty without access to hormones or blockers as traumatic. Traumatizing children is bad and should be avoided. The thing is, the effects of going on HRT are pretty close to the effects of natural puberty, so we can reasonably assume that a cisgender child going on HRT unnecessarily is about the same level of badness as a trans child not being able to get puberty blockers or hormones.

The article says that 98% of kids who take hormone blockers go on to take HRT, and I've seen similar numbers elsewhere. Since you can't tell whether someone is in the 98% of true positives or 2% of false positives at the start, then you have to make the same decision for all of them, and it just doesn't make sense to sacrifice the 98% for the well-being of the 2%. This would be very bad for the 2%, of course; that's why doctors prescribe blockers in the first place. But if the best option isn't available, you have to go with the least bad option.

(I suspect the ratio in this situation would be even better than 98:2, since real life isn't an abstract ethical dilemma. For example, many of these kids would be willing to go on blockers but not hormones, and they would likely be disproportionately in the 2% category, so they would avoid getting the wrong treatment.)
I can see exactly zero sources linked in the sidebar that addresses my comment. Also, keep in mind that my contention wasn't that such articles didn't exist. They exist, just like the ragebait articles about "how millennials are killing the diamond industry" exist. My point was that such articles are just that: ragebait hot takes designed to get clicks. They're not reflective of general sentiment. Referencing this articles as evidence that there's some sort of concerted PR campaign against "us" is foolish.
Im surprised there aren't any NATO anti missile defense systems at the border in Poland. Wouldn't that have been a smart thing to have done? Was it that impossible that this sort of thing would happen?
Pretty bad answers in some cases. Keeps repeating contradictory statements. I asked "Will the Thai baht fail." It kept repeating that the Thai baht is pegged to another currency, and then that the Thai baht is free-floating and not pegged, and then again that it is pegged and then not pegged.

Example: https://galactica.org/?prompt=Will+the+Thai+baht+fail%3F
Yes, and it seems to be that brains with higher intelligence have stronger tendencies to "overthink" and thus triggering anxiety, irrational discomfort, etc. Everyone experiences this in general, but with higher intelligence the likelihood dials up. See this paper - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016028961... for reference
This reply is Isle of Wight erasure.
> we're all moving in the opposite direction

I flew to Britain in 2020 of all times, and got in with a swipe of my passport. That’s easier than it has been for most across history to travel a fraction of that distance.
Hopefully, this time, they'll get engineers which will restore amazon interop with noscript/basic (x)html browsers (broken 2 years ago).
It's my company (it was a joke I'm sure my company is fucked up)
I see you've interacted with the adtech industry before.
Of course they are. SBF was the second largest Democratic donor and the NYT is the Democratic Party mouthpiece. All the News That Fits the Narrative.

Imagine the NYT firestorm if SBF was a massive donor for the Republican side.

SBF is fully corrupt. NYT is largely corrupt.
Omg we didn’t turn on product roles, shoot!!!! Changing and deploying shortly
> All companies are fucked up... the trick is finding a company that's fucked up in a way that works for you.

Love this.
1. Does it work as intended
2. Is it secure
Paperbacks are easily lost, stolen, or destroyed by things like flood, fire, mildew, insects.

While digital books are also stored on media that can be lost, stolen, etc., the magic comes from storing multiple copies in different places.
If you don't have a firm offer via email before you walk in, you are doing it wrong.
I think those pictures illustrate several of the reasons you shouldn’t repurpose shipping containers into buildings.

The buildings are, quite frankly, ugly. And that useless diagonal bit is really stupid. The tower for looking out over the beautiful country–side is a nice touch, but its square, blocky shape limits you to looking in four directions, making it quite inelegant. The nicest part of this project is probably the outdoor seating, and all you did there was plonk down a picnic table on some gravel. I’ve seen worse picnic tables though, so you get a few points there. I would have arranged for the courtyard to have an unobstructed view on one side, looking down the hill towards the orchard, but at least some of the tables have a view.
> The whole point of the "draft commit" is that you can easily see changes against your (uncommited!) changes. That helps to build up a commit step by step.

> Committing WIP stuff (and maybe even pushing that) makes the history useless.

Here's the thing. I'm a very big proponent of keeping history clean, and making sure that commits are atomic, and exorcising any "typo fixes" or the like commits from history. Not once have I found the concept of a staging area useful. Features like `git commit --amend` or `git add -i` are incredibly useful [1]. But not the staging area itself--it's only a thing that screws me up if I forget to add `-a` to `git commit`.

"Draft commit" also I think elucidates the other problem. You see, drafts of regular documents are frequently shared with other people, multiple versions of them created and shared, etc. Drafts don't become final until it's actually published--and there is utility in being able to track the differences in drafts as they are discussed. If you've got a "draft commit", then it should be able to go through this process--this is basically the process of code review.

Of course, we're already working with a VCS, which is designed to handle different versions of code, so... what if we made the "version history" of commits just... regular commits? Sure, shade them a different color, so you know that a commit is a draft, and you can tell which of the commit's parents [2] is the previous version. And knowing that a commit is a draft, when it actually gets pushed into the trunk, you can commit only that final commit and not include any of the previous history. Since the commits are using the same DAG logic under the head, questions like "what changed between version 2 and 5?" become just regular diff commands [3].

By the way, this system already exists. It's known as changeset evolution in Mercurial, and it appears that Sapling here has adopted it. My workflow in git tries to emulate this model to a degree, but the approach of having branches-based-on-branches doesn't mesh well with how git wants to do things.

[1] The number of times I have painstakingly sorted out which changes go into the commit with `git add -i` onto to immediately and accidentally undo them with a `git commit -a` is quite high. And because the staging area isn't an actual commit, it can't be recovered by digging into the reflog like actual commits can.

[2] If you amend or otherwise modify a commit, it has one parent, which is the previous version; if you rebase a commit, it has two parents, one of them the new commit it's based on and the other is the previous version.

[3] Worth noting that this question often turns out to be difficult to answer with most code review systems. Building a model of "commit history" into your VCS makes it come out for free!
Yeah, me too! When I got to the part

> Can you remember the names of the children of all your friends? Can you remember the wedding anniversary of your brother? Can you tell the last time you called your grand mother and what you talked about?

I freaked out because I can't remember any of that stuff. I have to keep my kids' birthdays in an app just so I can recall how old they are.
Yeah, I thought the exact same thing.
This is really cool, but all we really need is CSVs.
Author of the project here. Sorry about this.
Monica is not for everyone. I built it for me because I can't remember stuff. It's not my fault, I have a really bad memory and I think I'm somehow autistic. I would prefer that I didn't need it, and I hope no one will ever need it, but we do.
So for a certain type of people, it's useful.
Do you know that this tool is used in a lot of religious organizations? For prison visitors? For clubs and associations? It's good that some people find it useful for them.
I love that your friends had enough instances to develop rules of thumb. :D Sounds like a fun bunch.
Mostly echoing everyone else’s appreciation for the film in the thread. I was sucked in when I saw it the first time, and it’s one of the few movies I regret not seeing in theaters when it was available. If Alamo ever decides to do a special showing of it, I’d be there in a heartbeat.

It’s upsetting how as the years go on, I’m seeing more and more similarities to the world that the film depicts. But in a strange way, that makes the film all the more important to me.
> What’s your alternative? Everyone agreeing to sit round the campfire, hold hands and sing kumbaya? You can’t possibly be this naive.

I can’t speak for the OP, but this is an issue I’ve been interested in for some time. I think the alternatives are many, but it involves a multipronged approach, starting with reforming the financial sector, which helps fund warmongering in several different sectors, followed by slowly converting the defense industry into a civilian engineering sector (climate change remediation, infrastructure rebuilding and development, space based energy, transportation and habitation) combined with tearing the heart out of the arms sector and enforcing the law against so-called "lords of war" who help arm both sides. That’s just to start. The idea that peacetime can be more profitable than wartime needs to be a new mantra supported by financial incentives and large scale engineering projects that help benefit everyone instead of diverting resources to build more weapons and make a few companies wealthy while squandering the wealth of public treasuries that could otherwise support their people. The idea that war is a still a legitimate solution to a problem is the psychological hurdle that needs to be overcome. Nobody has to accept that this is the way it is. It requires courageous acts of individuals to stand up and say one word: no. I ain’t gonna study war no more. It’s really that simple. The hard part is getting the momentum for everyone to stop doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results.
Driving. Cleaning. Filing my taxes. For now.
use google next time https://sites.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/mamarim/mamarimhtml...
Just put it on a blockchain for me will you?
If you like pulp fiction from, say, the 1930s, they are very expensive if you can find them.
A time is coming where the upright man must decide where he would like to live, stay there, and abandon the hope of simply being allowed onto an airplane. He should cultivate inner virtues, and charitably leave his coming air travel "carbon credits" for another person, whose flexible spine can stomach the bio surveillance and bureaucracy.
This took me way too long and when I did find him, his egg scared me haha.
NASA Webb Micrometeoroid Mitigation Update
True, I could have.

But I've found there's a rather large contingent of anti-reddit people. And frankly, the wider this stuff is copied, the better we all are.
Wife of California Governor Newsom testifies that Harvey Weinstein raped her
Click-bait title. It's about devices, not the actual digitized book. I have .pdf files from 90's when I started to learn assembler, they still apply (for basic and medium) today and I can read them just fine on my Foxit reader.
I used to believe exactly this, and I think this is mostly correct. There are exceptions though. The one that made me reconsider this proposition was Andrew Ng's early work. "New Fangled" AI to precisely control a helicopter! [1] Can't really accept mistakes or imprecision in the outcome. A lot of it was RL work [2]

[1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-QUkgk3HyE&ab_channel=Stanf...

[2]: https://papers.nips.cc/paper/2003/hash/b427426b8acd2c2e53827...
An intentionally biased piece of reporting meant specifically to portray a person/group/movement under a positive light. The opposite is called a “hit piece.”
It’s so advanced it’s pulling from parallel universes!
Learn a trick from the kids and hide your phone in a book ;p Works until they ask why you never turn the page
Russian missiles hit Poland. Poland is considering invoking NATO Article 4
The first time I saw london was a few years ago on a long, multi-hour layover. I left the airport and walked around the city, then headed back to the airport to catch my flight. Looks like mini visits like this will become a thing of the past.
But they can be replicated much easier and much faster
> They want to do this so they can collect your biometrics and look secure.

It likely has more to do with reciprocity, as the US places these same burdens on travelers (including those from UK) visiting the US.
What Defamation Looks Like
More like 99% of bare metal perf for most workloads.
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/hpc/bare-metal-performance-with...
I was learning Next.js long ago and got started with this tutorial : https://nextjs.org/learn/basics/create-nextjs-app. And then updated it as I needed
Yes, that's one of the mitigations mentioned in the article:

> Kasikci: We identified several different mitigations that are effective against our attack. In general, they fit into two basic categories. The first category is to block a device from conducting electromagnetic interference into your TTE switch. [...] Another option is to make it so that, even if the attacker does inject electromagnetic interference into the switch and causes this malicious protocol control frame (PCF) to go out, the system won’t be affected by it. You can do this by altering the topology of your network, so that the spoofed PCFs never follow the same path as legitimate PCFs.
Seems like you’re overthinking it to me. If you want your kids to read books, take them the library or a bookstore. They’re bound to find something they like with enough exposure. That’s got to have a bigger impact than whether they see you reading a physical book.
You mean ARPANET won't survive a nuclear war? What a case of false advertising.
No, I mean what I say. Mass market paperbacks are at a low standard but it is a standard. They are great to put in a backpack because of small size.

A good trade paperback is better than any mass market paperback but trade paperbacks come in various sizes and designs and many of them have serious defects when manufactured.
I disagree. If you prompt an image generation model with a prompt like "an astronaut riding a horse," you get a picture of an astronaut riding a horse. If you ask this model for a mathematical proof, it does not give you a mathematical proof.
An awful lot of print media from the 19th century is gone forever simply because nobody wanted to pay the storage costs.
Just like how the US requires the same for EU travelers visiting the US? Seems reasonable to require the same going the other way. IIRC, it was the US that first introduced these requirements.
How this is easier than using snowflake/bigquery etc?

The situation where it seems useful is if I'm using a jupyter notebook and I want to use it to pull data in but it's too much to fit into memory, and sqlite is too slow... which seems like a pretty specific situation to be in? And it's not data that is part of some business process that needs updating frequently?

Or I'm just missing the point entirely? I see another post about huge parquet datasets - but how do I get them? Is everyone at my company comfortable with me moving them onto my machine even if I can? Is the dataset so big it won't fit into memory? Can't I just connect my jupyter notebook to snowflake anyway? Then I'm only pulling down the data I want instead of all the data.

I guess maybe the real question is - exactly who is the buyer of this product, how much will they spend on it, and who is the user?
I was wondering who foots the bill for the equipment
None to very little. This can then be reflected in the article. Or maybe you don’t publish because all answers are some version of ‘no comment’. The downside is that you don’t publish the article, the upside is keeping your journalistic integrity.
It's already too late for her. Better to focus on educating the next generation, honestly.
A Bot Is Flagging My Uni Work as a Copyright Violation
This bot has reported my repo of University lab exercises as being potentially copyright infringing.

I emailed the lecturer who taught me this course and they did not request or support this action. On the contrary they were supportive of me making my solutions public on the web.

It is worth noting that these exercises were not assessed and were purely for the purposes of learning and understanding the course content. In addition, there is no proprietary code anywhere in this repo.
What if you have fingerprint auth on your phone, couldn't you just upload that?
I thought the dock scratching the screen was a hoax that was dispelled roughly at the same time it launched. My kids have been docking it very ungracefully for years and it’s not scratched.
These are all great, although they're more concepts than implementable things. I see a lot of mirrors in my own experiences for sure.

Our volunteers seem to fall into:

* Obsessive Crazy People (myself): Very committed, for no discernable reason. Organisation survives because a few people are like this at any time.
* I Want Control: Someone wants to exercise their will or way of doing things over an area or similar. Put a bridle on them and lets go
* I Enjoy Tinkering: I like to help out and scratch my itches, but I wont commit to anything specifically and its mostly about fun and following my personal interests.
* I Will Volunteer for X: A discount, kibble, free soft drink. Extrinsicaly motivated by some external factor or gamification.
* Saints: I just want to help and give back.

So I see some overlap in your descriptions there. Attrition and Job handover is super tricky. Or really, formalising the training of things is a whole big job in itself, so often people get thrown into things and told to swim. Not great, but as a firefighter you probably know sometimes its hard to know which fire to fight...

Do you have any suggestions re sophisticated collaborative structures?
There was a Black Mirror episode which included that. It started off simple: a mother subtracting a scary dog from the view of her young daughter.
the sound design also was on point - Cuaron avoided most tropes from memory. And the music supervision, fucking incredible. Being a huge fan of UK Continuum, the use of early formative dubstep is just brilliant, not to mention Tavener's work on it.
Judge drops DMCA claims that Bungie reverse-engineered Destiny 2 cheats
So your claim is that GitHub would be equally successful if their website was just information about how to push to a git remote hosted by them?
>Haven't needed emergency search-and-rescue in 20 years, so it's just never seemed like a good investment

It's just $16 a month and there are other uses besides SOS; like texting to say you'll be late but everything is fine or that you've decided to stay another night. You can even get weather forecasts which is pretty huge if you ever do multi-day trips. Besides all that, carrying an InReach could one day save someone else's life.

The most important benefit it gives me (and my wife) is peace of mind. I find it worth every penny.
Hooray! Upgraded flawlessly from 36 to 37 on Win11+WSL2 setup in a matter of several minutes, and it works like a charm \m/ (as always)
It is, just hard to hear sometimes :) working on clarity asap (but I think it has more to do w product/UX than copy)