skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I've worked in small (less than 20 employees) companies and although there were no grooming / standup / retro meetings (i.e. all the bullshit agile stuff I can't stand), it was replaced with other bullshit like having to answer the phone and deal with passive aggressive customers, zero benefits other than salary (no 401k etc), an owner who said things like "microsoft can build excel, why can't we build <insert feature here>", no project/product managers to manage the todo list, so everything was urgent and must be done imediately!
The core of the raft was an aircraft carrier.
Geohot innovated removing iPhone sim lock (remember AT&T exclusivity>) at age 17, jailbroken PS3, and built an Autopilot-quality hardware by himself. He's now livecoding a ML library on Twitch.

Lex Friedman is Lex Friedman.

So no, those guys are smart dudes.
Well, I would say the biggest difference is while the watch mode you described runs all the tests for every change.

hypertest only runs the tests the were impacted by the changed code. Resulting is blazing fast performance.

I’d say it’s even fast than apples alt+tab animation most of the time.
Those are the conditions though. Your options are to work for him or not. What else are you going to do? Complain about it on HN? For what?
Fair point.
The Things Stack - the server that is hosted by TTN - can also be installed and run locally for free, with the same feature set as the TTN hosted community network.

https://www.thethingsindustries.com/docs/getting-started/ins...

https://github.com/TheThingsNetwork/lorawan-stack
On iOS this link opens up the Notion app which says “this content does not exist”. Removing the app was a quick workaround.
> conflicts are stored in commits (so rebases always succeed)

Is this pushed to the remote when running as a git porcelain?
Interview: Stuart Semple on Pantone, Freetone, Colour, Open Source
Fair point. He does describe his reasoning within the accompanying article though.
I don't know the real answer to your question, but a lot of products "aren't available in the US", which means the marketing site blocks by IP to try to avoid getting in trouble
They neglected to mention the biggest problem of all. EVs in Florida randomly catching fire after a hurricane. It turns out salt water is not so good around EVs.

"Fires are not just a concern in the presence of floods. Batteries can overheat, and crashes may damage the batteries, causing fires."

https://www.utilitydive.com/news/electric-vehicle-battery-fi...
Let’s not shy away, those balances are a speculation on the future price of crypto. If the prices don’t go up they’re affected, simple as that.
I like the concept and it seems that "run them all and see what changed" is a great model to avoid missing any side effects from a code change. However, if you're running all the tests on every change, doesn't that mean the responsiveness is necessarily greater than 250ms if your test suite is longer than 250ms?

Regardless, running tests in the background to eliminate human delay is good. It would be nice if the (~test time)*(test change likelihood) of the tests were used to order tests based on fastest relevant feedback.

A code->test change likelihood map may also be used to reveal previously unexpected dependencies. Also ~test time could be difficult (see halting problem and windows time remaining estimates).

This is good work.
If at the end of the 60 days, you get a lump sump payment of 4-20 weeks of base pay, no sign on bonus or RSUs included.

Amazon famously caps base pay, so most people, even super senior people will not be making more than 160k/yr unless they were hired in the last year.

If you find employment externally during those 60 days, all payments stop and you get nothing more from amazon.

To get the 7 months of pay you'll have had to be at amazon 10+ years. That's like 3 people. Turnover for all roles is >100%, tech is something like 50+%
This tweeter should stick to essays about lisp, about which his opinions seem more intelligent.
Bazel is awesome, it just runs way too many tests to be fast enough
Drag n drop being something you can actually use and that usually does the thing you'd expect, rather than something you train yourself never to do outside things like moving files around in Explorer or whatever, because it usually breaks things, is one of the things that makes it hard to switch away from macOS once you're used to it. Last time I tried KDE a couple years ago I crashed an app in the first five minutes by trying to drag n drop, and was like "oh yeah, that's why I didn't used to ever try to drag and drop things".
But not everyone gets burned at the same time so it's a gradual exodus. Plenty of time for Amazon to rebrand themselves as aliexpress/banggood clone with American shipping times.
Artemis I is a step in the Artemis Program, which has the stated purpose of building a sustainable human presence on and around the moon. https://www.space.com/artemis-program.html

Elsewhere in this discussion thread there's also cynicism as to why NASA isn't using cheaper / more efficient SpaceX hardware. I won't go into arguing all the criticism that's thrown at the edges, but instead simply point out that NASA has awarded SpaceX a $1.15b contract for second Artemis mission. https://spacenews.com/nasa-awards-spacex-1-15-billion-contra...
Sorry, no idea
Is this code really equivalent?

Wouldn't it block on the `await` calls, whereas the original code would instantly pass control back to the caller?

(Sorry if this question is odd. My JS is a little bit rusted).
I'm saying, given no other information, someone who has given away billions, effectively, as in saved lives, is "morally ahead" of someone who hasn't similarly done so.

We're not talking past each other. This is false.

Your problem is that you're using the concept of incomplete information, rather than that of ceteris paribus. Compare two billionaires, identical in every respect other than that one donated more than the other. The more charitable billionaire is morally superior (or, many reasonable people, myself included, would say so).

But that's as far as it goes. And in reality there are never identical billionaires to compare. One billionaire doesn't give enough; the other pledges all their money to GiveWell or EA or AGI, but also keeps hobos locked up in their basement. And, in the main, who gives a shit about the relative value of billionaires? The logic is shot completely to shit as soon as we're trying to compare the marginal sacrifice of a billionaire's giving pledge to the moral decisions people make every day of their life. And yet that's exactly what Scott Aaronson does.

I feel embarrassed just typing this stuff out. This is, like, philosophy 101 stuff? The logic I'm arguing against here is on its face one of the cases moral philosophers make against Bentham's naive utilitarianism --- that it leads people to believe stuff like this.
A squeaky belt can be an “engine problem”. A “paint failure” can be: the subframe rusts out and you crash.

My point is that none of these categories can be entirely written off superficial.
What’s interesting to me is that I’ve seen many colleagues and general sentiment towards using your own time off to make work sustainable in this fashion of 4 day work weeks. They sacrifice the ability to disconnect from work with regular 1-2 week vacations however.

Also the increase of sabbatical years tends to show just how unsustainable this can be over a long period. Especially in a stressful position.

I don’t think productivity is the right word to use. I would say efficiency is better. Output vs outcome is important in knowledge work.
This looks like the folks at Notion had nothing better to do, frankly.

Poems? Really?
> You better be standing on solid ground through because the man is smart.

You act as if this makes him some untouchable gods. Recent events should have made it very clear that “smart” people can act like bigger idiots than your average idiot.
IP is valued on it's ability to generate revenue. This is why the patent on swinging sideways in a playground is worthless, but the patent on the telephone was extremely valuable.

Crypto tokens are unable to generate revenue.
> handling a deer skull .. I touched a doorknob before washing my hands.

I'm not a germaphobe, but I think I'm with your daughter on this one. :)
My wife is a Montessori teacher of 1-3rd. From what she's told me, students transitioning to Montessori should do it as early as possible. Apparently older students in the "established" system have a hard time achieving the mental switch in thinking.

What I've enjoyed is watching how lessons are very "touch" oriented. Seems every lesson has a visual or touch oriented wood tool.

The students are dividing 6 digit numbers in 2nd/3rd (!).
I haven't needed to print anything at home in over a decade.
It’s a Turing Machine interpreter written in the 1960s (!) that someone figured out could be used to build chat bots.
It does not brake, just waits for your reaction.
You’re assuming an awful lot.
Google already has AI based autocomplete in things like Gmail and docs. It's not very useful of course but technically others are catching up here.
^ Surprisingly easy to read... Youmightbeontosomething
That's quality, not reliability

And Tesla yokes fall apart, who doesn't care about that ?

But yeah, bad infotainment can make car feel very old, in the "what the fuck I spent my money on, my ancient phone is faster!" way. Especially when you save few bucks putting essential controls on touch screen instead of a knob
> I think integration within the Apple ecosystem is what really outshines all competition

That may be, but a good OS should offer the same level of integration with devices of all kinds. Like the good old "Mac vs PC" ads suggested back in the day.

KDE has KDE Connect for shared clipboard, sending files between devices, and such functionality. Which even supports Windows on PC, and allows syncing between multiple mobile and desktop devices, so you can have a shared clipboard across all your devices from all manufacturers.
Elon publicly apologized that the android app was terrible, without naming anyone. Then this guy responded publicly calling out Elon.

I don't know any CEO that would be cool with that. If Elon named him, sure, rip him apart. But Elon simply referenced the android app, and this guy took it personally in the worst way.
Also stress free for 4 days > stress free for 5 days.
I'd say the hate is proportional to his own PR. Musk is clearly someone who likes the limelight. Plenty of CEOs fly under the radar of the public, any negativity or mistakes also fly under the radar or get rolled into "Company X did this bad thing".
But aren't most components actually sourced from third-parties? In which case, their experience with the traditional manufacturers could be reused. The French manufacturers, for example, don't produce their own seats.

I don't expect the auxiliary (as in not engine / drivetrain related) components to be radically different just because they're attached to an EV-powered car. Or does Tesla actually manufacture everything?
There must be a better way to report these numbers. If Tesla picks a shoddy trunk latch supplier that may reflect poorly on Tesla as a brand, but it tells us nothing about the reliability of EVs. I would be more interested in seeing the reliability of components that are critical to the propulsion of the car.
If you've got kids, I'd say be very grateful for this situation and stay put! ;) If you're bored, how about doing some learning in the hours where you've got not enough challenging to do? Anything from online courses not even in tech, up to Computer Science PHD. Even just learn better cookery skills or something. ;) I mean, one's learning doesn't have to be connected to one's job.. at all! But finding your job easy, not being tired at the end of the day, having time for kids.... that's gold dust. Which is pretty much what you said :)
> Maybe 2 decades ago when I was a teenager and valued money way more.

Even then it would not be a good idea to work for any of Musk's companies. The engineers that work there are notoriously paid little compared to industry standards.
Well, well, speak of gaslighting. The twitter employees have been hostile to him since before him buying this dumpster fire was ever a rumor. People are almost exclusively talking about his politics.

Unless I report to him directly his management style is hardly my problem. Even if it is directly, well.. honestly don't find that stressful either. If he is being a stupid idiot I'd tell him just that, have in the past. Sometimes, folks like that are even appreciative of the candid feedback.

What is the worst that can happen, I get fired? Please. At worst it isn't a fit, I honestly don't get the big deal and people get so emotionally invested in this stuff.

I get hired to problem solve. If management is not living in reality part of the gig is to push back. Don't value my input we can part amicably, it is only a gig, not life and death.
I think in this case it was more about prejudice about security and standardization (yeah, in full-remote international env). Like, what if an evil virus steals the client's data from my PC, and the chances of this happening somehow higher on Linux than on Mac
Like all office suites
https://archive.ph/5cMKH
Since forever , every place I've worked has had insane amounts of autonomy for programmers
I have to imagine Tesla does RSUs though right? So engineers are doing great over a 5 year timeline.

When I knew people at Tesla they were real fanboys of the car, which isn’t a bad thing, but if you’re trying to hire, like, ISO26262 certification experts I’d focus on paying a few experts well. The 24 year old fanboys can do the grunt work, but some well paid experts need to lead that process, and I doubt they’ll be that motivated by wanting to work for fast car guy.
My daughter (14) is currently going through this scenario. She was in a Montessori school from pre-school through 8th grade. The school she went to did not offer 9-12 so we had to transition her to a more traditional school for high school. We were extremely concerned that the daily classroom structure would be a problem, but she's adapted wonderfully. Despite never having traditional grades, tests, and quizzes, she currently has all A's and B's and is doing great. Speaking for myself, I don't think I give my kids enough credit for just how adaptable/resilient they are.
I work for a company in the blogging space (not AI related), and we are seeing huge uptake on AI content generation. Something tipped in the last month or so.

For most bloggers, the hardest part of a creating a piece of content is starting it - staring at the blank screen. At best, they are using AI to jumpstart themselves, then they can flesh it out, rewrite, etc. Human nature being what it is though…

Overall, I think it is effective enough to be a complete disaster for the internet.
Beautiful website. The transitions between the code blocks are a very nice touch
Doing that suggests they think that the threat from insiders >>> outsiders.
This opinion is also biased. We have no theoretical method for determining which design philosophy is better than the other.

We can't know whether the OOP religion is better, we also can't know if the Haskell religion is better, and we can't know whether NEITHER is better. (this is key, even the neutral point of view where both are "good" can't be proven).

We do have theories to determine algorithmic efficiency. Computational complexity allows us to quantify which algorithm is faster and better. But whether that algorithm was better implemented using FP concepts or OOP concepts, we don't know... we can't know.

A lot of people like you just pick a random religion. It may seem more reasonable and measured to pick the neutral ground. But this in itself is A Religion.

It's the "it's all apples and oranges approach" or the "FP and OOP are just different tools in a toolbox" approach.... but without any mathematical theory to quantify "better" there's no way we can really ever know. Rotten apples and rotten oranges ALSO exist in a world full of apples and oranges.

You can't see it but even on an intuitive level this "opinion" is really really biased. It seems reasonable when you have two options to choose from "OOP" and "FP", but what if you have more options? We have Declarative programming, Lisp style programming, assembly language programming, logic programming, reg-exp... Are we really to apply this philosophy to ALL possible styles of programming? Is every single thing in the universe truly apples and oranges or just a tool in a toolbox?

With this many options it's unlikely. Something must be bad, something must be good and many things are better then other things.

I am of the opinion that normal Procedural and imperative programming with functions is Superior to OOP for the majority of applications. I am not saying FP is better than imperative programming, I am saying OOP is a overall a bad tool even compared with normal programming. But I can't prove my opinion to be right, and you can't prove it to be wrong.

Without proof, all we can do is move in circles and argue endlessly. But, psychologically, people tend to fall for your argument because it's less extreme, it seemingly takes the "reasonable" mediator approach. But like I said even this approach is one form of an extreme and it is not reasonable at all.

I mean your evidence is just a bunch of qualitative factoids. An opponent to your opinion will come at you with another list of qualitative factoids. You mix all the factoids together and you have a bigger list of factoids with no definitive conclusion.
Most probably no. For a really, really exciting product, I'd consider.
well NASA does alot more than launches. They have telescopes, a portion of the ISS, and generally conducts advanced research on exploration.

>Now do the cost for SLS based on the total cost to date for NASA and all contractors since inception, including the costs for Apollo and the shuttle.

But I would agree with that sentiment if you only included rocket development. It's not just the cost of that vehicle but also the total cost of the institutional knowledge to get there. Starship might cost _X_, but it's because you already developed reusability and the ability to land the boosters.

Also, the biggest difference between spaceX and nasa is spaceX is verticly integrated where NASA avoids the development of alot of manufacturing capability.
What's the best way to learn marketing?
What if someone wants to write full time?
>We are already made of nanobots, we are the nanobots, we are in intelligence, we are a general intelligence

Yes, but that is neither here, nor there.

The question is about building those on our own, not if they already exist but we didn't build them or fully control them.
I suspect that many people are on way, way too high doses of adderall- even with doctors supervision. At the dose at which I found the best effects (about half of the standard minimum dose given my bodyweight), I couldn't tell in a given day whether I was given the drug or a placebo (we tried this experiment), but at the end of the month I would notice that my backlog of important but boring tasks was emptier (taxes done / homework projects turned in on time / living spaces clean etc). On a longer timescale, semester on semester off, the effect was about 1.5 GPA points
Because Notion AI is not built for developers ?
It's funny because people can just use other AI tools that do the exact same thing already with out Notion AI. So many services do this.
I wonder if another aspect of it is an effort to minimize weight, in order to offset the weight of the battery. The Tesla model 3 long-range battery is 1060 lb. To put that in perspective, that's essentially hauling around the equivalent of almost half the curb weight of a Honda Fit just for the battery.
Here are some ideas:

* Code quality audits / security audits

* Due diligence for code-related lawsuits
Do you think Twitter Blue was visionary?
> I'm honestly more surprised that they're saying they've only got the first word figured out.

They have figured out the rest of the words, as per the last image in the announcement tweet [1]. It's just that they don't make sense in modern Basque (source being me being a native Basque speaker).

[1]: https://twitter.com/aranzadi/status/1592129224806404097?s=20...
Recent HN threads have also made this clear to me.
Academic journals?
> would their reaction or their decision be better if they earnt a million quid per issue? No, so let's not bother with such facile excuses.

It would be super relevant if they got paid a million per issue by the community because then there would be an expectation of receiving something in exchange. Project maintainers don't owe you anything, the whole point of FOSS is that this doesn't matter because you can just fork it and make your own opinionated changes to circumvent differences of opinion instead of achieving nothing but negativity by hand-wringing over tone.

> and I didn't criticise them for turning down a request but the way they reacted to a request.

We can tone police the OP of that thread as well if you like. The way the OP effectively says:

> this [what currently happens] is just bad

> this [what I want] is much more sensible

has the same capacity to appear aggressive in nature.
I'm starting to think more people take Roko's Basilisk seriously than I realised.
Not a very useful article, and it's weak on technical details.

Hydrogen is a poor storage medium for energy for numerous reasons, such as steel embrittlement (it requires expensive special alloys for storage or transport under pressure).

Hence, hydrogen-from-water is applicable where it can be generated and used immediately. There are three obvious industrial applications in cleantech:

Ammonia production for fertilizer using atmospheric N2.

Direct iron reduction for steel production, i.e. reduction of iron ore.

Methane and jet fuel production utilizing atmospheric CO2 as the carbon source.

In particular, steam reformation of natural gas to produce hydrogen should be eliminated as a hydrogen source, as the fossil CO2 produced is then released to the atmosphere.
Thanks for your article, it is very interesting.

I don't necessarily see the difference between the very "slow" statistical feedback loop of cars and the equivalent in consciousness: what if a brain the size of a galaxy existed - such that signals across it took thousands of years. Therefore changes would appear anything but "real-time" to an observer on a vastly different timescale. Would that then mean the entity cannot be considered conscious? In which case, when would we arbitrarily drawing the line - at a relative distance from ourselves? Likewise on small scales, if a self-correcting FPGA was rewiring itself at a scale and speed we cannot perceive, would it not quality for consciousness simply because of our egos?

It's also worth noting that a possible alteration could be made to the definition you make of consciousness:

> Consciousness is the constellation of past experiences experiencing the present, assimilating it to act and prepare for future opportunities.

What we commonly believe to be conscious beings don't prepare for the future, they prepare for trajectories towards imagined futures that are maximizing internal criteria. We have no evidence that conscious beings have any capability to hold the entire causality of reality within their grasp before the dice are thrown, therefore the past really is the entirety. Some of it informs our classification of "past" things (clear memories of childhood for example), and all of it contributes to the shape of internal models we use to model things, predict & estimate outcomes, and pick maximization/minimization actions.