skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sounds like in this case it needs to be a craft union or industrial union: a union made up of laborers of a craft or industry (in this case, mobile app developers).

Get enough developers of high-profile apps on board, and now you have negotiating power. If they balk, make a union-controlled app store, threaten to sell apps only on the union store.
This is not entirely surprising since spammers have all day long to reverse engineer the process, while legitimate users have a business to run.
I wonder if part of the problem is that Anthony is not a fluent English speaker, and perhaps does not realize that he is not as clear as he thinks he is.
I have these. Not sure if they offer a false sense of security or not. But, to me, it increases the chances of me not having a catastrophic injury. I also don’t try to go 30mph downhill without protective gear. Full TSG Pass Pro helmet & wrist guards. Still fun.
I also found this to be the biggest clue from OP's post, not Slack specifically. You did a great job explaining why therapy could be a good answer, since what they're experiencing definitely isn't something one need always live with.

I've observed others have difficulty adjusting to WFH for the same reason; they have a hard time assuming the best intentions of their coworkers when only ever dealing with them asynchronously. Therapy, or at least mentally acknowledging where the disconnect is, could make a huge difference I think.
I have never felt the need to do so on iOS. I cannot say the same about Android.
I grew up on the countryside. Elementary school was in a different town. I had to walk 500m to the bus station and then take the school bus each day at age 7. At age 11 it was then secondary school, which included a longer walk to a different bus station and taking a public bus instead of a pure school bus.
Exactly, pinephones for everyone! ...actually, doesn't Amazon have a separate store for Android? Anyone know if they're better?
Hell, to this day she still (publicly) claims that they were thiiiiiiis close and all the naysayers who lead to this point are "hurting humanity" far more than they are hurting her.
Your solution for Reviewer 3 works, but often times, I just work with the editor to convince them the reviewer is confused.
Easy answer: Management is very bloated but immune, code monkey scum get the wrath of PIP.
Yeah, i went to public school in canada. It was all the same kids up to grade 8. Each year had basically 2 classes of about 27 kids each.
In climates where you get heavy snowfall (e.g. the northeast) most such systems can’t keep up, and you end up with a foot of snow sitting on a crust of ice, which is harder to clean up. The system will catch up eventually, melting from the bottom up, but it’s inefficient and very slow (and you get ice dams if there are any cold spots).

Sufficiently powerful systems work well, but are $$$$ and relatively energy-intensive, from my understanding. Paying the neighborhood plow guy is easy.
How’s the view from up on your pedestal?
This is what surprises me the most about these stories of dealing with Google/Apple app stores. Most of the apps that aren't produced by very well-known studios or large corporations are just trash. There are few gems here and there but its like digging through a landfill to find anything decent.
The screenshot provided doesn’t make it clear if you’re reporting a user or a comment.
Would suggest changing the copy in the UI (reporting a user, reporting a comment) and submit an update.
It is a way too harsh statement.

While indeed HSP is not a psychological term, it makes sense for self-description.

Unless you are a kind of person that cringes at people saying they are "coffee lovers" or "morning persons" with "it is not a proper psychological term!". :)
It appears that they've solved it, then. And now you have a problem.
When attempting to look at the git pull request files changed details [1], Github returns a server error.

Any ideas why?

[1] https://github.com/orf/pypi-data/pull/2/files
> We confirm that your app has options to report and block abusive users but your app does not contain functionality to report objectionable content.

Isn’t this the crux of the issue? Are the not asking for a separate “objectionable content” report type, distinct from the generic “report” option? They also don’t seem to show what happens after you press report? Does the app give reporting options? Is “objectionable content” an explicit one of those?
If you have to long press the comment to bring up the report screen. How do you conclude that you are reporting a user? I'd find it more logical if that related to reporting the content.
For those of you that are overly concerned/excited about this keep in mind that fMRI scans are kind of looked down upon the neuroscience research community for the dubious misinterpretations from the findings (see dead Salmon fMRI study).

It looks like PET imaging is what many are focusing their research into for better insight / “dynamic analysis” of the brain.
What's Next in FTX's Bankruptcy
Pretty good. We have Containers Tabs :)
Wells Fargo is the absolute bottom-of-the-barrel shit tier banks and that's really saying something.

Their locations are dirty, their employee behavior is reprehensible, and their company morality and ethics is non-existent.
Intel Introduces Real-Time Deepfake Detector
> Nothing has ever angered me more than ...

I understand that hyperbolic expressions have some rhetorical value, but I seem to be encountering them more frequently over time, and I don't think the value has changed over time.
And throw a pinch of salt over your left shoulder.
It all comes down to money. If professors make the subject hard, they don’t get students. No students is less money for the University and less opportunity for the professor to scope out potential thesis candidates.

There are some professors who make it hard. Generally those who have tenure don’t care and put down a shitload of work on students. Also, if you have a well funded lab that pays well you will have a lot more students willing to deal with a harder course.

Normal students want to zip thru and get to living. It’s sad - but its a tragedy of college being so expensive. It’s hard to take a risk on academic (mis)adventures that can crater your financial standing for life (yup for life - student loans cannot be written off during bankruptcy).
macOS defaults list: create dotfiles for almost all macOS settings
https://www.flow.club/ is another one that is worth trying if you like this method of working. Pomodoro is one of the simplest and most effective methods out there, and we've designed an entire social context around the Pomodoro to support you.
Yale and Harvard law schools to shun influential U.S. News rankings
Correct.

It doesn’t requiring knowing what you’re doing is against some law.

It requires knowing what you’re doing (which is against a law).

If what you did is very different from what you thought you were doing because of a legitimate mistake of fact (aka you thought it was your car, but it was not), then you’re not guilty of the crime, because you didn’t realize what you were doing was the thing that was a crime.

It’s roughy why not guilty by reason of insanity is a legitimate defense in some cases.

If someone is so insane they can’t understand what they were actually doing, or the thing they legitimately thought they were doing isn’t a crime, they weren’t committing the crime. That does mean they are probably such a danger to themselves or others they need to be locked up somewhere though.

As with the car defense, it is a very difficult thing to prove in most cases, and for good reasons
Internal tools never get the same attention as public-facing products.

Public facing products have competition. Internal tools have a captive audience that must use them, no matter what.
I did get the sense reading that transcript he was trying so seem edgy - maybe even impress a girl. But a really dumb thought process that he would even respond to her at this time.
You're laughing, but I was an early employee at a start up run by 20-somethings that's now grown into a company worth over a billion dollars and there were plenty of WTF moments like that until they started hiring adults.

No one was doing things like that intentionally, but as the company started to grow, so did peoples' egos and they people begin to confuse being reckless with being innovative.
The existence of such scalpers rather shows that the price set by the producer is too low for the given rate of production (i.e. there is more demand than supply for the given price).

In an ideal market, the producer would increase the price and get more profit. But since this action is not taken by the Raspberry Pi foundation, other market participants (scalpers) appear that attempt to profit from this price difference between then price set by the producer and the price that can be achieved on the market.

Thus, the existence of scalpers is rather a symptom that shows that the producer could set the price higher (and thus balance supply vs demand).
The link here will fix this, but it's insane to begin with that they can't tell you what your charges are. That ought to be illegal.
DALL-E 2 API Focuses on AI “Safety”
Part of the problem here might be conflating abuse prevention with policy compliance.

Abuse prevention is adversarial, and it's risky to reveal details about why something was flagged as abusive. Policy compliance isn't, or shouldn't be. A building inspector wouldn't say "this building has a code violation in the kitchen area" and refuse to provide specifics about what would fix it.

An app store needs both, and they need to operate differently.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9Di-UVC-_4

"Why Every Map of China is Just Slightly Wrong"
Record number of parents miss work as respiratory illnesses spike in kids
Yup. A common back-of-the-napkin way to roughly estimate water content is to divide by 10.
Australian Stock Exchange scraps blockchain-based core replacement after 5 years
The Australian Securities Exchange has officially written off the long-awaited technology overhaul designed to replace its core trading service with a blockchain-based system at a cost of around $255 million.
Does he realize his life is over?
A more accurate title would be "the Apartheid occupation deploys robots to opress and kill natives", and suddenly it would be much clearer why this is happening.
Flagged for some compliance issue. Perhaps not having a permanent address?

I have a home, but it happened to me twice at two major banks, once for withdrawing cash (apparently, more than $10,000 cash withdrawn from my own account within 12 months constitutes 'structuring'); once for reasons unknown (I was told that the law is such that they don't have to tell me). They made me take out my money.

Scary at the time; 20 years later makes for a funny story.
On large scales, it's more like you have a hundred big tractors and if one of them breaks down the whole operation keeps going because there are 99 big tractors left. The question then becomes: how much maintenance do you have to do per ton of food produced? A swarm of small robots have a lot more parts than a large tractor that does the same amount of work.

There's also energy costs to consider; does a drone swarm use more or less energy than a large tractor for the same result? I'm not sure what the answer is there, and I suppose it depends quite a bit on what kind of work is being done.
It's pretty much required, for obvious reasons, for CPS to put mitigations in place for whatever they might be investigating. Mitigations often feel like punishments, for sure, with the key difference that they are only until the investigation is resolved.
“No time for the old in-out, love, I’ve just come to read the meter.”
The largest American solar panel maker pledges to build $1B factory in the US
Probably 3. I am not sure who puts them on both ends ;)
Speed limits (in North America) are simply the 85th percentile speed of drivers on a specific type of road. The onus should be on the civil engineer who designed the road to make it physically impossible to go 150 in the first place - e.g. narrow/curved lanes, speed bumps, concrete bollards, trees on the sides, etc. If roads are actually designed properly, then speed limit laws are unnecessary because drivers will naturally slow down to avoid damaging their vehicle or themselves.
It wasn't THAT bad, but still annoying to figure out; and I would argue that this is never definitive. At least by basic inspection it's so easy to set an error.

The fact that it set off the static analyzer is very annoying too. Now I have to somehow debug the static analyzer, or just accept the risks. I've had some uncomfortable experiences assuming the analyzer is wrong and ignoring or suppressing it... theoretically, the static analysis will do a much better job than a human, so I can't help but doubt, and feel I missed something.

Just as an aside, some teams try to avoid multiple return paths. I believe there's some studies indicating a higher incidence of bugs... for a solid code quality reason you could theoretically deviate.
That’s a terrible idea. What if instead they were held accountable to criminal and civil processes and if Google didn’t meet their end of a contract they were accountable for it.

They can offer their support via a legal accountability mechanism and not a paid-for escalation.
That’s part of the problem… everything can’t be reduced to if-then-else; situational awareness, perspective, nuance and understanding are completely missing. In this case, how helpful is it to the child to remove the mother from the child, to teach her a lesson not to remove herself from the child?
> A subscription model seems appropriate when the value accrues to the buyer over time without regard to the level of effort expended by the seller.

That's a personal opinion, which I disagree with, and is additionally economically unsustainable. But you're free to have that opinion - the problem is sli actively misleading others by using a term like "rent-seeking" with a specific definition where it is categorically incorrect.
Has there been any reputable research on the traffic hit you'd take by offering a website and not an Google or Apple app? I know the Apple vs. Epic is one thing but maybe a yoga studio app should be web?
Did you know that natural swarm dynamics completely baffled us up until a few years ago: How do birds communicate well enough to stay on a group? How do they know which direcion to go? How does it look like a singular consciousness is undulating through hundreds or thousands of individuals? We marvelled and were dumbfounded.

But we had made it so much more complicated because we couldn’t see the few simple rules that each of them were following.

Honestly, I think robot swarms will be simpler than large singles.
This has already been linked 6 times on HN. Also: 2019.
How is legislation going to help? of anything, countries will add their own bizarre restrictilns to protect children, morality, religion and politicians.

"We're sorry, but your app will be removed until you can satiafy legal reatrictions for Saudi Arabia, Popua New Guinea, France and Alabama."
Kudos to you for bucking the trend and encouraging your kids to do things like spending afternoons romping around outside!

Complete anecdata, but the parents in my close friend group are split between "parents with a more free-range kid mindset" and "typical upper-middle-class parental paranoia."

The free-range kids are mostly happy-go-lucky, emotionally stable, and thriving. Almost every single kid over the age of 10 with paranoid parents is diagnosed with a mental health condition of some sort. I mean I literally can only think of one who is not in therapy or taking medication. I think the isolation and lack of unsupervised group activities that you describe is a big part of it.

One of my more paranoid friends made a judgmental comment recently regarding my other friend's daughter not being in therapy. I was extremely confused and asked if the kiddo was having emotional issues. Her response was, "Well not yet, but 12 is a very stressful age, and I think that when you have the money to do so, it's just good parenting to ensure your kid is talking to a therapist on a regular basis."

The level of paranoia needed to believe that every single perfectly stable 12-year-old needs weekly visits with a mental health professional to ensure their health and safety, and that not supplying this is neglectful, is just... bizarre.

I cannot help but believe this sort of behavior is severely damaging the psyche of these kids. And I also don't see how it can't be hurting the parents as well. Imagine how incredibly stressful it must be to be a parent who believes every stranger, every walk around the block, and every pre-teen mood swing is a serious danger to their child.
They could always segment networks to satisfy modern goals :)

And puppy mills explain the aptitude with some company cultures :p

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puppy_mill
Ergo... Artifical scarcity (of Pi's at MSRP) created by (non-practicing) scalpers (arbitragers, as they like to be called) reestablishing a price point, far in excess of what is reasonable, basically undoing the actual feat of engineering that resulted in such a cheap system in the first place.

Obligatory, and apropos:

https://xkcd.com/1499/

The bit people don't realize, is finance draws in people like this, and does the same thing, day in, day out. No value extraction opportunity left unexploited lest one "leave money on the table".

These people are a significant contributor to why we cannot have nice things.
I grew up in the Bay Area in the 90s and we were allowed to roam as free as we wanted. Sometimes we were a bit naughty but nothing too too crazy.

Everything is a possibility, it's all about the statistical probability of a bad outcome actually happening.

Someone could break into my house and murder me at any moment. I still don't wander around with a bat or a club because such events are sufficiently rare here in West Menlo Park.

When I was a kid, it seemed like adults were idiots by and large.

Now as I'm getting a bit more ahem, experienced, my perception is regressing back towards this hypothesis.

Why are the karens winning? :/
Interesting that pull requests 1 and 2 on that repo cause a 500 error when I try to view their diffs. Is this due to action on github's part to try to suppress displaying of the keys?
Yep, I guess you are right. But I think that some of those engineers come from Infosys-like companies, so they do exactly what they’ve been taught and what they are accustomed with. IDK, maybe it’s a cultural problem? Or is it a problem of following best security practices?

I understand that it’s useless to seek answers to such questions. Let’s leave it to philosophers. :)
The Prius has one of the highest reliability figures.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2022/11/15/reliabi...
Honestly lucky to get white labeled apps through at all
> Imagine if your car could only drive to locations approved as safe by the car manufacturer

We're not very far away from that. Example: Tesla sells auto insurance based on real-time tracking of driving behavior, and explicitly lists "where you live" as a factor. So it's quite possible "real-time location safety" is already part of their model. So you may already be charged more for driving to your Grandma's house. Granted this is not a ban, but it is close enough for discomfort and all it takes is the right (or wrong) motivation and the loop can be trivially closed.
Support legislation requiring Apple and Google to allow third party app stores.
This advice is relevant in many aspects of daily life too. I visualize it like tug-o-war. The more they disagree, the more they both back up + pull harder. But the more they "agree" (it's all in the delivery as @universehacker mentioned) the more they approach one another + relax their grip. Meet in the "middle"!
He's as clear as the inability to elevate this problem requires him to be.
And "more careful accounting". Not accurate/right accounting. Just "be more careful".
No, phosphate is vastly cheaper than battery metals. I mean, yes, we're using way too much of it (for agriculture, in a manner that ends up unrecoverably flushed into the oceans). And we're going to hit a wall, and its price is going to skyrocket. But to matter to a battery producer it would have to be so expensive that we'd have all starved anyway. The price levels between batteries and fertilizers are just too different.
I guess I don't really understand your assumptions. Why would 1 massive machine capable of doing all the various tasks of managing this farm require less maintenance than 1000 presumably much simpler, smaller machines? Assuming other things besides mobility break, I don't think retrieval would be much more of an issue, or that we'd have reason to expect the failure rate to be higher for each smaller, simpler drone than for the giant, super-complex one. To get the same work done, the behemoth would have to move much faster, have many more specialize tools and sensors all in the same rig, and would not be swappable for regular maintenance without pausing the entire workflow. Small drones could go back to base in shifts (again with some margin of extra drones) so that there are always 1000 actively working.
Ehhh really haven't. While you could argue farming is different due to it being more constricted, it really isn't and well unlike driving, this has a size constraint which has and likely will not be solved for in the near or distant future. It's complicated and might not be solvable. And well the current advancements while they seem nice aren't very useful. I know individuals who work in this sphere specifically and there are several problems alone with basic things such as sensors which are not adequate enough, if anyone attempts to solve this problem in the next decade I'd believe them to be the next theranos.
Where do you think Microsoft fits?
I won't get over the fact that the principal's name is bankman-fried. Who's writing this story?
Maybe you care about free speech and what Musk is attempting to accomplish? Maybe that's a possibility
This is super cool, but it seems pretty far from "mind reading".

It's not reading what the person's brain is interpreting the image as, but rather what they're currently seeing. I wonder how different these signals are.

It's a pretty big difference since the only signal they're getting is what the eyes are currently seeing. Essentially they're using a $1million fMRI to poorly do the job that a $5 dollar camera could do.

This is still super cool, but not quite our wildest scifi dreams.
It is meaningful in that people generally have separate expectations from the OS itself than from apps. That is, IMO the current hullabaloo about the Apple stock app (which can be uninstalled), etc. is nonsensical as it would fall under the privacy declaration of the app, not under the OS itself—but it’s presented as an iOS problem.

It may be an Apple problem regardless, but OS settings about data collection do not control app settings about data collection. Should the apps have those data collection settings? Certainly. But now you’re getting into something that Apple would be building that you can guaran-damn-tee that they will force other applications to implement (because it’s good for the user).