skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> All you need is to have the Single Emoji browser extension, which connects to your Slack workspace and enables you to use your favorite Emoji on your favorite tools, by making the smallest patches possible to how these tools work. Nothing too fancy, nothing too suspicious.

all you need is to connect random javascript to a major channel for social engineering and then run it inside major channel for software supply chain risk
This is pretty standard across much of the enterprise world. The sales team just has to earn their commission.

Indeed, even when they have publicly listed prices, it's usually possible to negotiate a substantial discount by dealing directly with the sales team. Like 50% is often possible.
I’m curious, is there a URL block list for Apple analytics? Or would blocking telemetry interfere with receiving updates and using services.
Zed Shaw’s “Learn Python the Hard Way” was what really got programming to click for me after trying and failing to wrap my head around C, Java, and Pascal many times in my teenage years. It taught me enough to start having a lot of fun with programming, and gave me enough of a foundation to end up actually learning those other languages in university.
I had to look it up too, it apparently is a constraint for subtypes defined in Liskovs substitution principle [1]. From Wikipedia:

> History constraint (the "history rule"). Objects are regarded as being modifiable only through their methods (encapsulation). Because subtypes may introduce methods that are not present in the supertype, the introduction of these methods may allow state changes in the subtype that are not permissible in the supertype. The history constraint prohibits this. It was the novel element introduced by Liskov and Wing. A violation of this constraint can be exemplified by defining a mutable point as a subtype of an immutable point. This is a violation of the history constraint, because in the history of the immutable point, the state is always the same after creation, so it cannot include the history of a mutable point in general. Fields added to the subtype may however be safely modified because they are not observable through the supertype methods. Thus, one can define a circle with immutable center and mutable radius as a subtype of an immutable point without violating the history constraint.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liskov_substitution_principle#...
This is a concise articulation of something that’s been nagging me for a while. I have his free articles in my RSS feed, but for a while I’ve been noticing that the gems of analysis are few and far between, and increasingly outweighed by the need to parse through many, many other words that don’t seem to convey very much.
Sorry for being annoying. I wasn't trying to be.

I would disagree about this stuff seeping in because of automatic lifetime management. The equivalent code in Java, Smalltalk, etc., would either not have the performance problem or it would be much more obvious that the code wasn't as efficient as it could be.
Creating scarcity in access will lead to shared accounts, account re-sale, hacking, takeovers – all the classical account management problems.
The Risky Business of Sam Bankman-Fried
What happened to them?

Webrings were a form of social network and modern centralized social networks with media capabilities ate them.

MySpace, Friendster, Flickr, Facebook, Instagram, Digg, Reddit and all the rest - they depopulated webrings, which drastically reduced the value in the network rings.

People have N time in the day to post content. They chose the easier, heavily networked publishing systems to use.
Auto-generate C_cpp_properties.json with a 99-line Ruby script
I like VS Code, but I hate updating c_cpp_properties every time I change my CFLAGS. It can also update your c-cpp-flylint settings. Is this an antipattern? Maybe, but it does the job.
CS4410 and CSE131 (they are very similar, pick one) for compilation:

- https://course.ccs.neu.edu/cs4410sp21

- https://ucsd-cse131-f19.github.io

These two articles for garbage collection:

- http://www.more-magic.net/posts/internals-gc.html

- http://journal.stuffwithstuff.com/2013/12/08/babys-first-gar...
"Retrospective cohort study of 196,992 adults after COVID-19 infection in Israel between March 2020 and January 2021. [...] We did not observe an increased incidence of neither pericarditis nor myocarditis in adult patients recovering from COVID-19 infection."

Study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35456309/
If the fool didn't laugh at it
It wouldn't be the Tao
I've never stated commodity money should replace all other form of exchange. In fact per above, you list a system where both credit and commodity money exist in parallel with one another.

>It's just a lot easier to carry a piece of paper that says "X promises to pay 1000 gold coins next year" then it is to actually lug 1000 gold coins around.

Not sure if you've ever carried around a gold coin, or ~$1800 (the value of 1 oz gold coin). But the amount of space it would take up, within factor of 2.

~1.8 cubic inches for the gold and 1.2 cubic inches for the bills. So maybe 50% worse space wise for the gold, but in any case not enough to make carrying gold much more burdensome than cash. Sadly you can no longer obtain large (~$1000) bills as they have been eliminated pretty much worldwide.
Are We Prisoners of Geography?
How would a different kind of bike setup fare? Like tubeless, or belt-driven etc, any gains doing untraditional things? Of course, one value in doing it plain is it's easy to fix and get parts anywhere.
Did he used to write for Linux format magazine or something similar in the UK? I recall them poking fun that his os had been removed from Wikipedia for not being note worthy or something. Or maybe I'm confusing him for someone else
"If" we were able to pull this off, which right now is a total pipe-dream, what do you picture the average person doing in this world? Would you implement harsh restrictions around what you can do if you are dependent on the system?

Can someone have 20 kids and not raise them because it isn't part of their calling? Would people from other societies be allowed to immigrate in or would it be closed to all migrants?

I don't think it is some orchestrated scam from a power mad global elite that is fighting against your utopian worldview. I don't think it is feasible, barring some kind of sci-fi AI that manages everything for us.
I think it's closer to "people are willing to sacrifice some culture for convenience, until it destroys all the culture"

I think we are reaching the point where it's been hollowed out enough that there is finally showing some pushback against it, many asking if the convenience or access to audience is still worth the cultural sacrifices we give for it.

That said the demographics of most things are ballpark <10% produce content, <20% interact with content or comment and the rest >70% just consume content, and this seems to be roughly true ranging from websites to video games (change interact to multiplayer and produce to things like YouTubers or Bloggers about it)
AT&T was for a time the sole provider of telephone service throughout most of the United States. In the 80s it was broken up into competing companies due to anti-trust action.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breakup_of_the_Bell_System

The companies we now know as AT&T, Verizon and CenturyLink all came from that.
True, but who wants the dollar-store version if the verification mark? Twitter is/was selling the prestige of the badge and what it represents to some, specifically "I am a notable individual". Any other symbol would only mean "I paid $8 for this", and my guess is that isn't quite as compelling.
What amount of pressure results in you solving P=NP?
You thought only a bug inside your app could crash it?

Now your browser can crash because of a bug on a server, somewhere, which you weren't planning on browsing to, let alone even knew existed.

The future truly is here.
The existing responses are already covering the up-front question quite well, and they're even pointing out that there is crossover to much more obviously questionable stuff in the distribution channels where you find them.

On a more basic level, I generally require a documentary to present coherent ideas in a coherent way, and call me an egotist if you must, but if I come away from a documentary feeling like I'm not understanding an idea, I chalk that up to a failure on the part of the documentarian to present correctly, rather than a failure on my part to understand.

A failure, or in many cases, an attempt to exploit personal insecurities as a memetic vector for bad social ideas. If you can be made to feel a strong sense of mental inadequacy before a very complex system that is show real problems in the world, you are just a step away from being convinced that even worse ideas than those currently in play are somehow the solution, or at least, that enacting those ideas is less worse for you. Video art in the hands of skilled manipulators can help make entire nations do horrific things.
At the risk of being overly controversial, what would have been a better option given the times. Lynching black people was not uncommon back then for context of how minorities were treated. Of course taking away someomes property when they have done no wrong is wrong. Or the internment camps. They did bad things because it was war.

Do you remember how muslim americans were treated and attacked after 9\11? The animosity of the majority of americans towards them? The point I am making is even now this is how people react but back then modern concepts of human rights and justice were not prevalent.

The war effort then was not like any war effort afterwards. It requires mobilizing the civilian society "lose lips sink ships" for example was a big motto because a lot of people see stuff and if they repeat it, it can make it to the enemy. Combine that with the fact that the japanese emperror was regarded as a god by the japanese, you can see how much paranoia war time president and generals would have about anyone japanese related.

I am not saying what they did was in any way justified but rather if I was in their shoes I would also be susceptible to committing such atrocities. Really, what I am trying to say is how easy it is to do what america did to the Japanese americans then and how we should not be so quick to pass judgement. Their motivation was fear and paranoia in the time of war not hatred like with Germany's camps.

Judging people of the past is easy but learning from history is hard. The lesson I learned from this is you have to be strong (whatever that means) and resist attempts by the government to do these things in the future as well as educate people on history like this.

It may not happen to japanese people but it can happen again. If there is war with China and they start sabotaging, extorting and bombing americans are you sure chinese americans won't be mistreated again? All it takes is 51% of people to agree in a time of war (fear of death and cruelty).
Can they be put on a generator bike? I’m concerned about their carbon footprint.
No, it's not. The prophet is with the Jewish exiles in Babylon and is enacting the siege of Jerusalem. Food, water and fuel are running short in Jerusalem, and he plays out what it looks like.
There are available PDFs of the whole book with working links.

http://library.lol/main/913E141A0E63103B31A049348478CE07
I think you're missing the forest for the trees. You're right, basic coding skills are easy to learn. Much like basic accounting, basic DIY skills, pretty much the basics of anything. But not everyone finds it interesting.

I have a friend who's quite technically savvy and has been on the net since the early '90s. He used to maintain a website but once social media came along, he was gone with the wind. I asked him recently if he ever wanted to go back to posting on a personal blog and he said no, he found the minutiae in writing content, hosting, maintaining, etc to be boring and a waste of time even if he was only spending 10 min a week on it, given that he was mostly just interested in interacting in small comment-like bursts on online forums. For chatting with known friends, he's in group chats and Discords. He just doesn't find the value on having a personal website. I suspect most people don't either.
Did anyone say that?
I care more about what's happening in practice than marketing speech semantics.
I was sufficiently opposed to Brexit to move because of it, but even so I'd be surprised if it takes the UK less than decades to even revert to mean GDP/capita — and even then I still expect its economy to continue growing, just slower than most others.
Mainly grammatical analysis, but that helps some more pedantic parts of very formal English.
Good thing this acronym distingui- oh.
Perhaps everything you ever said being stored forever on the Great Servers in the Cloud is not the best way to go about things.

Loss and death are part of life, they should be part of online life, too. Especially for things that are basically a glorified chat room.
Yup. Thing is though, nothing about their financial situation justifies this level of recklessness. Yes, there’s an urgent need to cut costs and find new sources of revenue, thanks to Musk’s own decisions to perform a leveraged buyout and then scare off advertisers. But that doesn’t justify making such sweeping changes in so short a time that there’s no way a proper due diligence is being done.

Honestly, I suspect the issue is much simpler. I think Musk detests and can’t bring himself to respect Twitter’s engineers at all, thanks to preconceptions he developed on the outside. That’s why he’s so happy to mock and trash their work in public, why he wanted to get rid of half of them without even giving them the courtesy of speaking to them, and why he believes he knows better. Expect most of those remaining to be replaced as soon as Musk finds other willing saps to take their places.

It’s the same reason so many of Musk’s fans, including a bunch of people on HN, reacted with such evident glee at seeing Twitter engineers being laid off. That’s not a healthy mindset.
You can never predict something as complex as the earth climate.

It's not a question of computing power: it's impossible to predict a complex system at all.

We can't even predict a simple double pendulum, now imagine a climate simulation: it's basicaly billions of double pendulums, all dependent one on another.

Even the smallest error in initial conditions or the models and even over a short period it will totaly diverge from what will actually happen on Earth.

This will be nothing other than a money sink. Invenst into clean tech, not these useless models that are incapable of predicting anything at all.

Eg how can you take in account a solar cycle which could change the energy that the Earth recieves more than any human made intervention/pollution?

You cannot. All of these models will fail totaly.

But politicians and the media love them for fear mongering, which is how the money gets pumped into this.
I wonder if their trading models include credit risk.
I’m running a Gitea instance (along with other stuff) on a $3.25 per month ($39 per year) VPS with zero maintenance thanks to Debian security auto-updates and Certbot.

Alternatively, you could use a RasPi, or whatever hardware you have at home, with a free DynDNS service.
…and math is among the “liberal arts”.
If twitter is bleeding money so fast, slow changes of direction are not the first choice
This list is only public companies
The opposite is true. Constitutions ( plural ) protect the access to, and therefore the production.
This to the point that "protections" that don't contribute to primairily the access and secundairily to the production thereof could be deemed unconstitutional.
> the architect of the Matrix

Who was, by the way, an homage to Vint Cerf, creator of TCP/IP.
Furniture inherited from great-grandparents
Some of those will exist no matter what (Twitter accounts are unlimited and still sold) but - limited to invite only doesn't need to mean "limited as in scarce" - there's no reason to share an account if you can just invite the person, instead.
Wait, does that mean we get to see the fail whale again? The good old days when Twitter was suffering as a RoR app growing too quickly.
I've also only got the J&J, once, only because my employer was threatening me with termination if I didn't get vaccinated. They actually never followed through on that threat for those that held out. I wish I hadn't. Lesson learned, never again.
I would exclude MIT from that list, but the rest of those schools basically have a huge reputation for grade inflation -- i.e., once you get in, you won't be given a bad GPA because you're paying so much. Grading people legitimately based on competence would piss of the parents/donors too much. Curious to hear your take on this.
Actually he had worked in compliance, and then they moved him to front office. Extremely dangerous. Not recommended.

But the point is you can't infer anything about Jane Street risk controls from people who didn't have that role.
You can only run Uber with <100 engineers if you cut out a substantial amount of the systems Uber requires to actually function as a company. Goodbye Fraud, Risk, Safety, Insurance, Compliance, etc. That may be true for things like Whatsapp with a simpler feature set, but is certainly not generally true. For instance, people often underestimate the amount of ongoing engineering effort to stay up to date on changes in tax law in all the countries Uber operates in.
Also, this assumes that there is plentiful electricity in this post apocalyptic future to mine bitcoins!
It's about incentives.
FTX "donated" to the right people and Bankman/Ellison families were very politically connected to the democrats and Biden admin.
What you want?

Rolling Stones https://youtu.be/krxU5Y9lCS8,
Joe Jackson
https://youtu.be/XGqmiT7JJVg
or
New Radicals
https://youtu.be/DL7-CKirWZE
?
you need to get off the internet for a few hours a day buddy
Binance does the same, as do Bitfinex and Tether and pretty much the entire cryptocurrency ecosystem.
The specification about «fighting crime» seems to be there to directly exclude other petty purposes, while the legal constraints are waiting for better definition.

Anyway, I could not find better articles to clarify the point.
It seems I read too much in your comment. I can agree with labeling his method of decision-making as incompetent but I believe what happened at FTX goes beyond that and I just hope he doesn't get away with it by playing that card.
The author is probably compiling inside an x86 container on his Mac M1. Doing anything in an x86 container/vm is extremely slow on the Mac M1 as it’s arm64 not x86. That specific issue is nothing to do with Rust.

Why the author is doing this I do not know.

Rust does cross compilation fairly easily out the box. If the author needs an x86 Docker image they can compile an x86 static binary without Docker then copy the binary in to the container. It’s a trivially simple workflow and you end up with tiny Docker containers.

FROM scratch
COPY target/my/binary /bin/binary
ENTRYPOINT [/bin/binary]
Please read the context of what you're responding to.

COVID was around before the vaccines, and before the boosters, and between the boosters. Some of us got it before the boosters were available, and before the next booster was due. This is the context you're responding to.

For a stupid real world example, my college friend had COVID was required to get the booster while he was recovering from COVID, so that he could continue school after. There's plenty of nonsense still going around. Natural infection usually doesn't count in the school system, from what I've seen. Surprisingly it does, where I work.
There are plenty of reasons not to add a transpilation step to production code:

* Looking at stack traces is suddenly so much harder and involves reverse-engineering the transpiler unless your transpiler is sophisticated enough that it can de-transpile the stack traces back to the source language.

* You're adding a step to your build pipeline.

* You're taking on the risk of bugs or security issues that may exist or be introduced to the transpiler itself.

* Your developers need to learn both the source and target languages.

* If the transpiler project is abandoned, you have to begin maintaining it yourself, or you need to de-obfuscate your transpiled code enough to make it your canonical code.

I think that anyone who used CoffeeScript in the late 2000s / early 2010s understands the pain of using a transpiled language that wasn't worth the trouble.

Not to say that one should never transpile, or that Hy's not worth it or not production ready! Just that, there are things to consider, and how much you need to consider them depends on what your "production" is.
That doctor (Seyfried) is not a great doctor either. He is an antiestablishment, contrarian ideologue who omits data and arranges his facts to fit his hypothesis.

Sure, cancer might be a metabolic disease to some varying degree (depending on the cancer), but it is not exclusively metabolic. It is a very complex disease. biased researchers like Seyfried do a disservice by acting as though they have single-handedly solved the problem of cancer mortality (yet curiously are never able to provide conclusive evidence).
My hunch is the analysis was fatally flawed.

> the cost of storage has been decreasing at 38%/year

This assumes that the growth rate in bytes used is staying constant. I don't think that's accurate in the aggregate which is why there's compression. Additionally, the space overhead isn't just about space usage. Flash suffers horrible wear which means that your space amplification is also write amplification. The combination in a growth rate in the amount of data and a plateau in write cycles means that without compression your cost of storage is probably costing you much more than it should.

Additionally, it assumes the growth rate for storage won't hit it's own plateau. Indeed, solid state prices seem to have leveled out already only 6 years after this article because flash is really hard to make cheaper (& even spinning disk has plateaued).

I think the analysis is right that you can't just assume you can use as much CPU as you want, but I think it's wrong to eschew compression, especially since the DB gets to choose where to spend compression time on (& decompression is usually free because you cache decompressed results so on average you're not doing much).
They aren't externalities and shouldn't be priced in.

Should the luddites have been compensated by those who operated mechanical looms?

If not, How are the situations different?
Back during the Yahoo and MSN chat days (remember Windows executables?), there were also "Download custom smiley packs" ads all over the Internet. I never tried them because they were probably malware. I have the same skepticism for this extension, or how easy extensions auto-updates can turn it into one.

Are the other responses in here non-ironic?
In the Netherlands the Moderna vaccine is not used for younger groups. I think the cutoff is 40.

Anyone over 12 can get vaccinated and get a booster, but it will be the Pfizer vaccine.
> According to internal documents viewed by CNBC, SpaceX has spent more than $160,000 on the Twitter ad campaign for Starlink in Australia and Spain so far.

Your definition for "a bunch" is a bit questionable, but good on you for posting the source.
My bird scooter can’t speed, why are fantastically more dangerous and sophisticated cars allowed to?
+1 on Halliday/Resnick physics. This book changed my life--it was only after reading it that I started to trust my own ability to learn directly from textbooks.
The latter. They're looking for H1B jobs in the US. Sorry, woke up too early.