skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The wallets are speaking clearly, DeFi volume is through the roof right now.

https://defillama.com/dexs

A lot of people put money on CEX because they are ignorant, or willing to take on some risk for slightly cheaper and faster trades. Those people probably regret their decision now. If they used Uniswap and Aave they could not have withdrawals paused because of one company’s insolvency.
Haha I got 4/6 without knowing any Haskell. Maybe there is still hope!
Out of curiosity, and asking as someone who didn't do much math beyond university algebra and calculus... how do seemingly arbitrary constants like "70 million" show up in what I imagine is a theory-dense proof?
> Statistically, PHP is enough for most people so why use TypeScript?

In the context of our discussion PHP doesn't make sense as it doesn't have native support for running in the browser. TypeScript is specifically a good choice because it has been built with the browser and the backend in mind.

> you might be underestimating how much minimising power and resource usage drives much of the modern world. Memory/storage + CPU ticks == money.

I have learned over the years that what actually drives the modern world is pragmatism. Sure, performance matters, but when you have to reimplement hundreds of libraries from scratch because the ecosystem doesn't exist then you are losing far too much time (and your implementations of those libraries are likely to be suboptimal). You're better off losing some performance and picking the established language, so that you actually ship your project within a couple of months instead of a couple of years.

Nim has been going now for 15 years and has thus far failed to reach critical mass. With each year gaining that critical mass becomes less and less likely. A killer feature for Nim needs to be so beneficial that it overcomes the lacking ecosystem.

> You mean C?

I was referring to the space of languages that work well on embedded and in the browser. C doesn't support the browser side well.
> And they lost remaining 1% the moment the weaponized energy.

What? Who weaponized energy?

Do you think that Russia should have conducted business as usual after 300 billion in foreign oil reserves were seized?

You don't have to like Russia, but you can at least be honest.
That’s a great write-up.

I suspect that a lot of folks are in the same boat. Mastodon will be getting a workout. The bugs will show up en masse, but they will also be fixed, and the service will improve greatly, as a result, with a lot of “lessons learned” lore, added to the canon.

I noticed that CNN ran a front-page story on Mastodon, so it’s now mainstream.

Welcome to the big leagues, li’l buddy…
> the common interpretation of winter which is December -> March in the Northern Hemisphere

As I hope you are learning, in very many places in the northern hemisphere, perhaps including most of Europe, that is not what people mean by 'winter'.
Wishful thinking. There's a difference between a planned and deliberate reorganization, and injecting infinite chaos. Chaos and stress don't produce better results for knowledge work; it just makes the most qualified people leave and invites horrible MSPs like TCS and Taos to come in and keep the crap barely working.
I'm not sure the issue is technical, I think it might be business. Doesn't seem to be that there's a non niche use case for it.

If you take the actual words Virtual Reality and think about it, we already have that. Alternative worlds where you do stuff like fight monsters. The social element of that is already well served with traditional screens, and you don't really need to be able to be in it 3D for it to be engaging, because other people have engaged us since the beginning of time. Specific worlds like WoW or EVE are also popular because they're specific, one is fantasy, the other is sci fi. An unspecific world that kind of just looks like reality, what is it even? Who will go there?

Something like surgery that is on all the Meta adverts, maybe. I'm not a surgeon so I can't tell for sure, but it would seem to me that an already high value activity like that has already found all the educational materials it needs to let surgeons learn and practice their craft. A VR version world be nifty but how much is the value added over whatever surgeons are currently doing? So it might come but it will come because it gets cheaper due to general investment, not because the doctors really need it.
Hopeful thinking: people realize that FTX is a CEX and the true value of crypto is in DeFi and DEXes.

Reality: contagion will spread next week and everything will probably crash, even if DeFi remains unaffected.
Huh- Running Postgres at home, while running the web server on Digital Ocean. I would think that since running several round trips to the database for every web request, it would make more sense to run the entire web server at home?
Way back in the mists of ancient times, about 1970, a myth arose in
minds of primitive men and women;

The new Internet was like a telephone and could connect anybody to
anybody.

This 'peer-to-peer' idea was good thing. It felt exciting and
democratic. It remains a fantastic leap for humanity, worth defending
to the death.

However, for some - a possibility once becomes a necessity unto the
limit - that is to say the idea that;

"occasionally anyone could talk to anyone"

silently transformed into the idea that

"everyone should talk to everyone all the time"

whereas in fact

"most people don't want to talk to most people most of the time".

That is a problem at the intersection of people, technology and
culture. As the earliest culture-shock pundits predicted, we still
haven't really worked out what we want to use this technology for.

It would be best not to optimise too early, to leave our options open
and not let any one model dominate development - which is the theme of
resilience through diversity in the OP.
He will get away clean.
I think US needs its partners more than ever and doing things like this on purpose is bound at some point to backfire on them spectacularly. I think rational US government would not do something like this on purpose because there just isn't a whole lot to gain but boy, there is a lot to loose.
The readme doesn't seem to mention or list what libraries this depends on, it has chi and jet at least based on the structs section.

Given this "framework" is predominantly a collection of other people's (usually apache/mit) work, where is the BOM/licence text including all of the dependencies?

And why has the author attempted to licence their likely sub 100 lines of glue code under the GPL?

I don't see the point in using something like this which is basically a prefilled go.mod with some other files with a pretty stock organization.

I've used Pagoda (https://github.com/mikestefanello/pagoda) in the past which makes a show of displaying its nature as a wrapper around a bunch of community libraries, and is documented as such. They also make effort to document the interfaces for each component so you could easily replace them with your own implementations to avoid getting stuck due to the "framework". This is my preferred approach for all of these "starters" now since using pagoda.
I meant the willful malicious destruction of FOSS commons that is EEE.
Most of verehovens films have the same mechanism where the viewer has a question about if something or someone is legit or not.

Total recall classic example where the viewer never really knows if Quaid is having a mental break or not. Even showgirls has the signature ambiguity.
It's not stupid, it's a charming hack.

Reloads rocket launcher.
Get hired just to get laid off again lol
Don’t believe the hype, onshape is like a Cad software on Citrix. It’s not spreading the cost of computing a complex fillet over hundreds of machines (or even better, running the same operation in the browser and the cloud and letting the fastest one win). They spin one EC2 for you.
So you really don’t get any benefit from the cloud.
@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com@gmail.com
> The regular public won't hear about this.
From what I am reading, quite a few people had money in FTX so this may not be entirely true. The word will spread about people who lost it all in the FTX bankruptcy.
I estimate only about a 5-8% total increase in Fediverse users since September.
yes, well slave labor is remarkably efficient.

> legalized abortion in 1920,

and later banned it. But then again tankies tend to be quite lose with facts

> Provided a decent standard of living to all their citizens while also suffering inmense pression from the First World?

What?! Is this sarcasm? Millions of people starved to death to a large extent due to misguided bolshevik policies between 1917 and the 1940s. That is arguably true only starting in the 50s and 60s.
is http://bestbuy./ dotless?

I would think yes, despite the nomenclature, and that there is technically supposed to be a dot after the tdl.
> However Rust doesn't dominate embedded. That's still C or even C++.

I don't disagree. What I meant specifically is that Rust dominates the space where you want to target embedded and the browser (Rust does well on embedded and has good WASM support). C/C++ does not support the browser well at all (you can say that it supports WASM too, but Rust has far more front-end frameworks that actually target the browser than C afaik).
On the other hand, constructors don’t allow returning an error because C++ has exceptions.
I believe they might have meant that it comes in October/November, not that it's gone by December. It stays "miserable" until spring, with January and February being the coldest and snowiest.
half of the things op listed are false, though.
I think that they said they would pay 8% interest on your funds. Which I guess makes it quite attractive. A discord server I was on in the spring had people offering advice on how to get this... I just assumed it was a scam, perhaps other people weren't so cautious.
Two wrongs do not make a right. Enjoy Mastodon but be conscious of your federated benevolent dictator if you are not running your own instance.
I think the bigger damage is done to the institutional investors. They might have been able to ignore historic collapses of exchanges as the sort of thing that happens when a promising new asset class is dominated by amateurs that originally wanting to trade playing cards, not sophisticated professionals like them. But SBF was supposed to be the adult in the room, an ex-Jane Street trader focused on providing liquidity who wanted the market to be better regulated...
http://bestbuy./ should force a non-rewrite.
Restating my comment from Celsius unwinding one month ago:

Three clear and obvious outcomes of this unwinding:

1. The crypto mantra "not your keys, not your coins" rings true.

2. Entrusting your personal financial data with a private company is sure to end in disaster, either by hack or court order. Privacy should be a basic and legally protected feature of blockchains.

3. Centralized Finance or CeFi is mostly a sham and deserves to be heavily regulated. Not to be confused with on-chain and transparent Decentralized Finance or DeFi platforms like Aave that have behaved predictably through this downturn, and have never required KYC.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33153865

We haven’t seen privacy and KYC be an issue yet with FTX but data breach could be next after the money goes.
Well 3hours commute per day is, of course, not too good. I get to office on foot in 90 seconds, so it certainly affects my POV (on the other hand, it used to be longer, but I just moved close to the office).

On you working 2 jobs: I knew people who were working remotely 2 full-time jobs at the same time. I think their employers wouldn't be thrilled if they somehow found out about it
This is so powerful.
The renting part is the same for fusion360
In my opinion issues start to arise with dynamic provisioning on the stack level. I do not mean cloudformation stacks specifically, but rather stacks as a "bag of heterogeneous resources deployed together, with inter-dependencies on each other and a singular purpose".

As long as you have a constant number of stacks consisting of ec2 (even with individual resources autoscaling), lambdas, whatever really, you can write an IAM policy for that. It might be tricky but generally doable.

As soon you get into a random number of stacks you also get into dynamic IAM generation and that is really hard. Add IAM adjustment for used-based inputs and sprinkle with cross-account access and there you have it: an endless stream of new IAM headaches.
I mostly agree - that was the intention of the caveat - although I don't think there would be too much harm done if somebody started with ES5 then layered ES20xx features or new browser APIs on top as needed.
Also in the article is advice “Make sure you have a plan if things go bad. Make sure your savings are in order, brace for impact to cover for a while.”

I know lots of people making 6-figures who would be in trouble inside of a month. For most of them, that’s a choice where they have other feasible options.
In terms of direct thermal heating from waste heat, we are almost precisely where we were when global warming was first raised as a problem.

Climate change is just the first of many problems, and claiming that consuming more makes life better is the same logic as finding a starving man, seeing him improve with three square meals, and then concluding everyone should have a gallon a second of saturated sugar syrup pumped directly into their gut.
Here's the comment where people posted their recommendations.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33560306

To summarize:

- The tour - https://go.dev/tour/welcome/1

- Effective Go - https://go.dev/doc/effective_go

- Go by Example - https://gobyexample.com/

- The Little Go Book - https://www.openmymind.net/The-Little-Go-Book/

- "The Go Programming Language" by Alan A.A. Donovan and Brian W. Kernighan

- Go 101 - https://go101.org/
I'm as sceptical as the next person but I don't think "coder writes code" is anything.
I'll be honest, the "full documentation" just being generated API docs isn't great.

Just show me how you use it, damnit.
When I started my personal instance, one of my goals was to run it cheaply and with little maintenance. Being writing Ruby for many years of my past life, the decision between Mastodon (Rails) and Pleroma (Elixir) was quite easy. A week later, my Pleroma instance is taking 500 megabytes of RAM and a few percent of the CPU of the second cheapest Hetzner instance (4.5€/month).

Even better would be a deployable binary service. Calling out all Go and Rust developers!
"If many people in this space are advocating for decentralized exchanges, how come everyone uses centralized ones?"

Convenience.
I see, it pops up every few months but most of the time it appears that doesn't get any traction with exception of a few times in the last 10 years. Interesting case, at glance I think it should be getting more love than it has.
That’s not a gTLD, it’s a ccTLD.

See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24442033 for why it’s allowed on ccTLDs
1) I don't believe this for a moment, not when you include capacity factor and storage requirements for renewables to actually compete with on-demand power. What do you do when the sun doesn't shine and the wind doesn't blow? How long can your storage solution sustain that? If it's anything less than "infinity", it's inferior to nuclear.

2) This is just trying to spin reliability as a disadvantage. You can throttle nuclear just fine. Overbuilding in order to have "peaker" nuclear plants is perfectly viable - France's grid does so. Pointing out the difficulties of integrating with flighty, unreliable renewables is a point against renewables, not nuclear - you are failing to account for grid storage, then complaining that nuclear is a poor grid storage solution. Well, yeah!

3) The safety record of nuclear vastly exceeds any other power generation technology, even if you factor in Chernobyl. We are making the perfect the enemy of the good. I daresay that India could weather a nuclear incident or two and still come out ahead of the 2 million people who die yearly there from air pollution, in large part from burning fossil fuels.

4) This just point 1 repeated, and again, you ignore grid storage. True, you can throw up PV or wind quickly enough, but it won't solve your energy problem. People were complaining about how slow it is to construct nuclear plants decades ago. If we'd ignored them and started building, we'd be in a much better situation now. The best time to build a nuclear plant is 20 years ago; the second best time is now.
We used to call that a 56k dialup modem and when we used it it wouldn't be long until our parents would scream up the stairs "Get off the internet, I'm expecting a call!"
Sure, just like the guy who poops in the produce section gets banned from all the local grocery stores.

Freedom sometimes means no one wants to talk to you.
That's exactly why we created this project.

Over 7million programmers in China have to learn English first before they can study how to program, for most of them, "下标不可超过数组长度" is much more easier to understand than "the index of a array should not exceed it's length".
well, at least twitter is a well established, extremely visible corp. for a mastodon instance the list of questions is long and start with: who’s your hosting provider.
I'm not sure gamers have over-specced their gaming machines to the extent they're using more electricity than a medium-sized European country...
I mean it should be obvious that anyone who offers 8% interest has to do some high-risk stuff with your funds, right?
> Who moderates offshore content

Whoever is in the pilot seat and that’s beautiful. Although if things start to get a bit too edgy we might see entire servers blacklisted from store apps. Also server-wide block done by administrators. If I’m not mistaken the largest mastodon instance is Pawoo.net and that’s basically a japanese board for posting controversial hentai artwork. Pawoo.net is blacklisted from most popular Mastodon servers.
Reshape... Like, we all suddenly want to go to a bar and socialize, where everyone is shouting at each other and throwing chairs? What people fundamentally want in a civilized discourse has not changed for thousands of years. Elon will reshape nothing, except for his bank account.
I said salary, not total comp. Employees often don’t consider bonuses as “true” salary as they aren’t guaranteed, much to the dismay of the employers who pay them with real money. Just my limited experience.
Some call this a "hack", others who are brighter noticed that the recent FTX limited account unfreeze before they declared bankruptcy was to mask their own personal outflows as they siphoned money from a sinking ship
In what way is crypto an insurance there? Typically, ruthless regimes are good at separating you from your assets. I don't see any of the typical methods not working with crypto.
It's really only an insurance against marginally bad situations and there lots of other things work equally well.
Also the homepage animation is a demo of Rayleigh–Taylor instability

homepage : https://oimo.io/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh%E2%80%93Taylor_instab...
I found this absolutely mesmerising – thank you!
One obscure downside of having so many TLDs is that if you type something like "chrome.search" in the address bar and press Enter, it won't search for "chrome.search" in your default search engine. It will try to navigate to it (unsuccessfully), because ".search" is a TLD nowadays.
The article doesn't mention who paid for shipping on what must be a very large freight bill
This is the funniest GitHub README I've read in a while
To be fair selinux is a bar so low you'd have to dig to do worse.
Completely agree. We had McKinsey crawling all over one company I worked for and in the "workstream" I was the main point of contact for they had the first meeting where they "were in listening mode" and at the end of the meeting I said "look, if your plan for this workstream is to take everything I've just told you and put it on powerpoint slides and tell it back to us while charging for your time that's not going to work. So if we have a session tomorrow you actually have to bring something". They called our CEO and shut our workstream because they said they didn't think they could add enough value.

All the other workstreams continued for a while with them burning our investors' money and also all ended with a big nothingburger.

Basically the team we worked with had one guy who was genuinely brilliant - razor sharp, really knew his stuff etc just great - and like 8 people there whose function was to pad the billable hours, make slides, carry printouts and drink the free coffee.
You need to subscribe to a paid app.
You just get a different set of tradeoff on a decentralized exchange. E.g. many users don't have the basic opsec required to protect their private key without losing it.

For a cryptocurrency owner taken at random, I think it's likelier that they make a mistake with their private key than they lose tokens held in a Coinbase (or another CEX among the less dodgy, regulated, etc.) account.
The "doubled in price for every 20 miles" bit is extremely interesting, do you have anything I can follow this up on, thanks.
CheatSheet made me realise how often I hold modifier keys while thinking about my next few actions. I wish it had slightly more flexible settings so it wouldn't keep getting in the way - but OP might be a good alternative for people like me
USSR did fairly well in the 50s, 60s and 70s though. Most of the really bad things (e.g. mass starvation) happened years before the cold war started. American companies like Ford invested into building factories in the Soviet Union in the 20s and 30s hardly a sign of an economic embargo.

So you’re implying that US should cooperate with autocratic regimes and empower their rulers to further oppress the people living there? Obviously they tried that as well and I’m sure you’d criticize it as much. So which one is the right option?

They should’ve hanged Sadam back in 91, the only problem is that it took two wars for that to happen. Getting rid of the Taliban was the right thing to do as well, but again the fucked up there miserably as well. Same in Syria (obviously you have the Russians involved there to which complicates things)
Pagoda: Full-stack web development starter kit in Go
Sibling comments address your question, but it occurred to me that this anecdote (which you may well already know) from Andy Hertzfeld illustrates why fillets are a vital feature: https://www.folklore.org/StoryView.py?story=Round_Rects_Are_...