skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> the systems in question don't improve that situation

I don't think that's true. Look at statistics or ask patients, doctors are very inefficient to detect cancer.

On contrary medical imaging technologies are very efficient. Even a simple phone camera & app can automatically detect things like carcinoma or melanoma, when most general practitioners are not able to recognize them for what they are.

Another statistical tip is that not all doctors are equals. Depending where you live in country side or big town you do not have the same odds of survival. In Europe simply crossing a border would mean that survival could vary by 20% for the same type of cancer.

Eight years ago I designed a simple low cost (~$100) tool to detect heart failure [0] by using resources from Physionet [1].

Physionet competition is motivated by the fact that 1/3 of doctors were shown to be unable to detect heart failure with stethoscope. Competitors show that automatic tools can detect it nearly 100% times.

This does not mean the end of general practitioners, they simply will use other methods, more scientific (no more hunch), and anyway more specialists will be needed to operate those smart tools.

[0] https://github.com/Hjertesvikt/Hjerte

[1] https://physionet.org
Imagine someone told you in 1989 when all the internet did was email and ftp, that the internet was going to do a lot of other things but they didn't really know what yet.
I mean I doubt it, I think it’s more that not having a Twitter presence at all is better for everyone who isn’t joining in the fun of bullying Elon.
That is the first significant rise of ocean level after hitting some tipping points that cause massive glacier break aways and ice melt. Kim Stanley Robinson depicted it in New York 2140 which describes life there after many of these pulses.
I have been using budibase for pretty much all my internal tooling at an Ecom startup. it is pretty good for pretty much most usecases.
A few of them.

1. This book made all the patchwork ideas I had about the incompleteness theorem fall into place and click while I was doing my bachelors https://www.amazon.in/Godels-Proof-Ernest-Nagel/dp/081475837...

2. This similarly solidified a lot of patchwork ideas I had about money https://www.amazon.com/Money-Unauthorized-Biography-Coinage-...

3. This didn't make the topic click but it shed light on the entire landscape after which anything I read on unicode made sense and filled up my mental map of the whole area https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2003/10/08/the-absolute-minim...
Could you name, specifically, the true things they do not know or the false things that they think they know? Or is 'misinformed' here simply a way of saying that you disagree, and have no such preference for people not requiring you to license your own code a certain way?
No, the regulation explicitly includes components:

> For the purposes of this Regulation, the following definitions apply:
(1) ‘product with digital elements’ means any software or hardware product and its remote data processing solutions, including software or hardware components to be placed on the market separately

https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/89543
Lego Discontinues Its Mindstorm Range
FYI this doesn't happen on YT music at all; the user uploads are completely segregated from the YT catalog for licensing reasons so your files are stored exactly the way you upload them.
> I'm an American that sells software to clients in the EU that this legislation considers a Class I critical product (https://vuplex.com).

For more context, a "critical" product cannot be self-assessed. He would have to hire the auditor.
It took me 200 applications to land my job, and I think the rest of everyone I know who’s a decent programmer had similar situations. The bottom line is that everyone has employment and only had to move for it if they’re taking a high (120k+ TC for entry level) paying position.

This is “falling of trees” compared to any other industry. Being able to land a middle class job directly in the field of your education without having to move is a very nice thing. Even if it takes 200 applications. It’s not common outside of engineering.

The median individual income in the U.S. is 32k [1]. Software engineers in the U.S., as a generalization of industry around the world, is literally the best that it gets.

That being said. Job hunting is soul sucking. Good luck.

1. https://datacommons.org/place/country/USA?utm_medium=explore...

(Edit because people are concerned about my 200 number. I got an offer for the first 60k position I applied for and decided to turn it down. I was shooting a tad higher. I’m also counting “one click” applications: Zip Recruiter and Linkedin.)
There's a lot of software that speaks ActivityPub. Mastodon is the most popular, but Pleroma, Pixelfed, Hubzilla, Friendica, and several other less popular/mature options exist. Some of these, such as Friendica, are older than either ActivityPub or Mastodon, but integrated support for that protocol later.
I don't think he's saying the option shouldn't exist, just that it's not sensible to yell at the people using exchanges like what they're doing doesn't make sense. You have the option of buying a vault and not using banks in fiat, too, though I very much doubt you do that.
Avoiding all regulatory scrutiny and delays of an international wire transfer by converting them to domestic transfers in both countries is a major use of crypto that has almost no way of being quantified. International wires are fraught with painful user experiences and costs and time issues and its all unknown beforehand.

This works even better when you already have inventory of ANY crypto, or keep stablecoins on hand because you use them. then the request to pay doesn't require you to get USD over to a crypto exchange and convert, just the near instant act of transferring. When your contractor is able to get goods and services and invest in crypto, they don't need their local fiat either, just a common reality, not something to convince anybody of (unlike when we were doing this during the last decade).
Acoustic pornography recognition using CNN and bag of refinements
That wasn't my point. The OP suggested that Apple was being deceitful about its position that this posture is "for users". To me, the fact that a user can potentially (and accidentally) lock themselves out of their own data with no recourse is a justification for a more relaxed security posture that completely lines up with being "for users". If there is no evidence of a security breach as a result of this lowered posture, then the lowered posture is both "for users" and also worth it. I, personally, would rather have the higher security posture but I can't see any way for Apple to implement that that wouldn't result in someone's grandparent unintentionally locking themselves out of years worth of data. I already see it when people don't backup their phones (to iCloud, since it's so easy) and then lose all their data when they drop their phone and it gets run over by a car. Apple must see the trade-off as worthwhile to be able to offer users the ability to gain access to their data after an extensive verification process vs. having the strongest security posture possible.
I'm still receiving tons of mails and LinkedIn offers, even phone calls, and I haven't really seen much of a difference or decline. If anything, the compensation packages have only gone up, but the offers are as tone deaf as always.
“React.js Introduction For People Who Know Just Enough jQuery To Get By” met me exactly where I was at and made React click for me. Forever grateful that it existed when it did; it went away, not sure if anyone has an updated version of it.
> Lots of no responses or form rejections

To be fair, this was normal at the peak too. (as well as ghosting after doing 3 rounds)
I work at Apple and my team has been “hiring” for the last 2 years with no offers so far.

Why? Because even if you are a good candidate, hiring is not as easy as people think.

Among the many challengues we have I can list the following:

1. The people interested in your profile have minimal influence in the process,

2. There are people who are always chasing for the shiny new object (or person, in this case),

3. There is a sea of resumes in our hands, and we pick the best, but they want the world and lose them during negotiations, and the ones at the bottom of the list who really want the job, move on because the process to get to them takes too long (several months),

4. People over estimate their qualifications. Their abilities may be good, but they write over the top accomplishments in their resumes that are hard to believe, at least without proof, and they are the first ones to get rejected,

5. HR interferes too much in the process. They sometimes change the job requirements, sometimes ignore candidates that we explicitely tell them to follow up with, sometimes extend meaningless offers just to keep potentially good candidates in the hook (people with offers at other Big Co.), sometimes force candidates to accept offers without a signed paper, so on and so forth. Obviously, good candidates get fed up with this and decline/renege the offer, we lose them, and the people below them too because the negotiation took too long (3-5 months),

6. I really want to hire motivated individuals, and I know many people like me across different teams, but we lose motivation over time because of all the roadblocks, and the cycle(s) described above repeats.

The whole process is kind of silly. I have reviewed hundreds of resume from people who are doing amazing work at other companies, but we reject them for very small things. Only two of approximately 20 referrals got an offer, and I am 100% sure that all of those referrals are as good or better than me (facepalm).
You might want to consider using a keyboard layout that supports diacritics. I use UK Extended Winkeys for example, where I can do AltGr+[ followed by a letter to get it with a diaeresis, allowing me to type äöü. It supports almost every European language character.
Just wondering: why would the regulators (with whatever minimal regulation exists now) even want to catch any large-scale fraud?

It's to their greatest benefit to have a few good examples of crypto crashes in order to gain a casus belli to have full-scale crypto regulation.
> He is, like, the Yngwie Malmsteen of his profession, maybe.

There is a comparison I would have never expected.
I really only use my echo for a few things, but those things I do nearly daily and it provides enough value that I'd replace it if it broke. I don't need it to be an "everything device".
Go's not technically global but the path of least resistance is to use it as if it is. You'll only notice the difference on an actual multi-user workstation, or if you take extra steps to get a per-project package directory.

Rubygems is usually global.

The granddaddy of them all, CPAN and its cpan install tool, defaults to installing globally, in practice, on most systems.

Pip, as you noted, does it.

I think Maven's typically user-scoped, so not really global, but also not project-scoped like npm. Similar to Go.

You can get around this in most or all cases—sometimes with options or config, sometimes with extra effort or some aliases or scripts, sometimes environment variables, sometimes with 3rd party tools—but the simplest or default mode is global installation, or at least project-global if not user-global in Go's or Maven's cases. And many of those solutions (e.g. rvm) still don't scope installation per-project by default, like npm does.

At the time npm got started, especially, it was definitely an outlier in its default scope. Some others have taken its approach since, and maybe a majority of total language-specific package managers even do, these days, but adjusted for actual use in the wild, I bet NPM's by far the most-used one that operates that way, and that most of the other popular ones scope more broadly—including, often, globally—by default. That is, a language-specific package manager one runs into in the real world, in 2022, usually isn't going to scope packages like NPM does without some extra effort. Global or per-user scoping (the latter being functionally identical on any single-user machine) are more likely.
I have one, but only because it's a computer in the closet in my house. :)

I like mstream lately, it's very simple as compared to e.g. MPD.

https://mstream.io/
The best way to do that would be to create a climate version of Fox News.

Stopping the most powerful country from seesawing between being controlled by full blown climate deniers to just road blocked by them is the single most impactful thing below could do, but he won’t because it may increase his taxes.
Some go as far as translating shortcuts, which I dislike even more. In Spanish Windows, copy is CTRL + C (copiar), but paste is... CTRL + P (pegar)
True. If your thoughts stayed entirely in your head then it probably wasn’t a crime. But if you for instance jotted down some rough cost estimates on a piece of paper you were in trouble. :)
Assuming all detected hacks have well-written postmortems, this would be one actual contribution to society from them
For me too, maybe we should containerize users
Anyone know about ML? It used to be a different job market, I was thinking of moving into that area but now not sure if its bubble has been popped or always will be a premium.
> Can you say more about this?

Not much beyond the article I linked above. I've been aware of such research for a few decades. It appears that inducing happiness is super easy. But also way more addictive than the hardest drugs. There term Wirehead was a term from SciFi (and later Cyperpunk) to describe someone addicted to such stimulation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wirehead_(science_fiction)

Early use was limited by how to control the mood. Manual control would be impossible, since anyone with access to their own happiness would turn it up to max pretty much at once, with no ability to turn it back down. With it at max setting, people would simply stop functioning, not even able to eat, have sex, etc, so unsupervised it would probably be leathal pretty soon.

So for early application, one would have to set it at some constant offset, which probably had some downsides. (Possibly poor reaction to normal stimuli, I don't remember.)

Later on, maybe about 10 years ago, brain research and computer tech started to allow more sophisticated control of the level, where it would regulate the happiness-level in a way similar to how normal/healthy brains do. (The patiens would be treatment resistent MDS)

Still, the potential downsides are obviously immense, potentially making fentanyl, crack and meth seem like child's play.

A self regulated version as this would be so deadly that I think very few knowing its risks would dare use it. But one _could_ imagine people setting up arrangements where they grant the power to regulate the level, according to some principles.

For instance, let's say you're bored at work, and procastinating by reading HN, at a level that reduces your performance. Let's say that, instead of getting hold of ritalin or microdosing shrooms, you go to a shady lab that installs one of these things, and controls it remotely by lowering happiness just a bit when you're not doing what you "should" and rewards you slightly when coding (by monitoring your laptop), with additional rewards when pull requests are approved.

Now, imagine your manager (or a CPP rep, if you're in China) finding out, and bribes the lab to add some more "features" to your profile, including loyalty to her personally as well as a more aggressive level of rewards for workplace performance.
On the contrary, they were being touted as a shining example of responsible crypto. They paid for a good reputation by donating to the “correct” causes and politicians.
It boils down to satiating managers who want to hear 'agile' but not follow it's whole set of principles or practices.
> I think people do not deny those religious experiences because there are experiments to trigger them and the experiences can be observed for instance using brain scans.

Some people, sure....but many people deny the validity/genuineness of them, or the potential existence of the supernatural all the time - it's practically a sport on Reddit, not all that uncommon right here on HN, and something I have experienced many, many times with real scientists in zoom meetings. Let's not forget: scientists are first and foremost humans.

> But what scientists deny is that we see any prove that these experiences have any supernatural cause.

Some scientists practice strict/disciplined epistemology, and others do not (I have observed it with my own eyes) and go on to assert/imply that it is a fact that there is no God(s), and that these experiences are only [in fact] delusions, the drugs, social/psychological conditioning (ironically), etc.

And if one is to ask them some pointed questions, the response typically descends rapidly to rhetoric and personal attacks. You can even explicitly point out to people what they are doing, but they are not able to stop - often, they will act as if they did not even see the text pointing out their behavior, even if that phenomenon is pointed out in subsequent messages!

I truly believe that there are certain topics that throw even the most powerful minds into a state of disarray. Extra interesting: it seems like most can acknowledge that they are subject to bias, logical fallacies, etc if the topic of conversation is directly about these psychological phenomena....but if the topic is not that, but rather from a particular subset of special ideas (culture war topics, certain instances of the unknown), this knowledge and ability vanishes.

I think it would be rather hilarious if this phenomenon is actually a very big deal (with regard to affairs on Earth), but people are unable to address it (or even manifest curiosity) because of the phenomenon. Plausibly, ~success could be within reach, but we are unable to reach out and grab onto it.

Meanwhile: things like climate change "are" (so it is claimed/perceived) "a big deal". So much wasted potential.
That's literally clarified in the Reddit comments. If a new option is added in the future, it will just say `git --am` is ambiguous.

The git man page explicitly says that if you're writing a script of git commands, you should use the full option name, so you won't encounter this ambiguous issue.

So no, it doesn't constraint the evolution of the API.
> Nobody wants to chase open source developers.

Yet open source developers are subject to the regulation.
For a bit of history, this type of thing has been around a very long time:

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-talk/2001NovDec/009...
I'm a business owner and hire SE roles on a regular clip. I'll share some things with you, the market is totally unpredictable right now. Even with some projected wins, we don't know what a new/mixed US Administration will mean. Investigations? Deadlock? New laws that impact us?
We have record inflation for our career lifetimes and we seem to have entered a recession, but people still disagree on if we're in it and how long we'll last.
My customers are all experiencing this, and while that emotion has slowed orders they have not stopped.

All of these things together as a business owner, going into holiday times; make me keep the mindset that hiring anyone right now for a non-essential position can probably wait until I can understand better what our company's financial picture is going to look like.

edit for typo
Now. This is a policy change that was a direct result of the Cambridge Analytica leak. Cambridge explicitly used the cross-site and cross-app tracking to build the models that they sold to people/companies/governments.
The difference is that email and FTP on their own were really useful.
Speculating is the intrinsic use
Arguably the most important service a notary provides is archival. Everything signed at a notary is kept there pretty much in perpetuity. If a notary retires all his documents are taken over by their successor.
The large majority of remote jobs I've seen on LinkedIn and other job boards, or applied to, are U.S.-only, sometimes restricted to particular states. Companies using the transition to remote to expand worldwide must be advertising elsewhere and are not really an issue for me.
Awesome Emacs: a community-driven list of useful Emacs packages, etc.
Certainly; that's the idea. Regulation is usually designed to favor large incumbents with some fig leaf of justification, in this case hand waving about security.
3blue1browns youtube series on linear algebra
All stuff that I think was firmly established by 2016 in my opinion.
Show HN: TC-eBPF to Securely Redirect Packets Toward Dynamic App Created Sockets
I leveraged TC-eBPF to build a Plugin TPROXY FW / packet redirector to steer traffic to my target application's dynamically created sockets. Hope others find it useful. Would love to hear how other eBPF developers are making use of eBPF socket steering capabilities.
Performance is a feature.

Unfortunately, it's not a feature that masses deeply care about, good enough is good enough.
Not sure what you are doing. But for the few jobs I applied for I always got an offer. Maybe take a look at the jobs you are applying for and what you are putting in your resume?
> It's true that they can stop losses, but it could also lead you to sell at the bottom and at the worst price.

Worse, in relatively illquid (and circuit breakerless) markets like the fringe cryptocurrencies they were investing in, stop losses can easily result in selling at absurd prices and can even be manipulated to do so. There was even a lawsuit against FTX for exploiting them.

E.g. say something is trading at $105 after falling a bit and you believe there are significant stop loss orders at $100 (perhaps aided by exchange insider knoweldege), you see that there is very little volume on the order book below $100. You then put in a huge buy wall at $10... sell down to $100 to trigger the stop losses, then laugh as idiotic stop losses dump coins into your $10 wall.

Moments later the asset is trading at $101 again.

In large liquid markets they're less risky because someone will usually hop up and take the deal at $99 so even though you get burned a little it usually won't be too bad. But cryptocurrency markets, particularly for the fringe scamcoins FTX was investing in are just not very liquid.
Getting people hyped on green technology has a ton of value.
Most of the time that the DOE loan is brought up, the context is the implication that Tesla and SpaceX are parasites that only survive on taxpayer bailouts. So "they paid the loan back" is a pre-emptive counter-strike against that narrative. Probably unnecessary in this case.
They do now but only because they leaked a bunch of individual user data models in the past. Apple has always operated this way so there's nothing for someone to tie together. Facebook's position is basically useless when someone can recreate user data models for anyone that was on FB before the policy change.
AltGr+q; AltGr+p; AltGr+y; AltGr+s and Bonus: § (AltGr+Schift+s)

Once comited to muscle memory it's very easy
Perhaps require that certifying commercial software as CE entails publicly certifying all the individual OSS components as CE as well.
Makes sense, we're still updating the site, just pushed it out as quickly as possible. There's more examples of Insta: https://www.instagram.com/petpic.ai/

We hope to bring the costs down in the future, but for now this is the price...
> And yet their stock is already back up 60% of the amount it dropped in a mere 3 days.

Alternatively phrased as after 3 days, only a mere 40% has been lost. Hits different though.
Almost certainly not, I can't imagine they'd include amortizing the CO2 emissions of the concrete used in construction (which is to your point staggering). I have a better understanding now of where you were coming from in your post. I'm optimistic for the future of wooden skyscrapers [1]. Maybe as high as we can get them is the optimal limit for density?

[1] https://www.wsj.com/articles/wooden-skyscrapers-are-on-the-r...