skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
With modern HTML it's actually pretty easy to use markdown wherever you like. Though there is no built-in markdown element, they have built in the ability for authors to define custom elements. You can define your own custom <mark-down> element and put your mark down syntax inside and as it is, as source code it's nice and human readable even if we didn't do anything further. But we can also define how this element should render, and so it's very straightforward work to wire up any existing "markdown to HTML" library in JavaScript to consume the markdown contents of the tag and display rendered HTML.

This is so easy to do, not just for markdown, but almost anything you could want to embed or work with in HTML.
There aren't 370k jobs paying FAANG or near-FAANG compensation and benefits. Probably about 10% of that is paying anywhere near what Twitter employees are used to getting.

I'm making close to the low end of an entry level software engineer at Twitter according to levels.fyi, and I'm making above average for senior software engineers in my region, based on recruiter/job posting salary ranges and posted salaries on these websites. Haven't gotten a regional recruiter offering anything competitive in the past year since I started this job.

Also the unlisted jobs paying anywhere near Twitter level compensation is probably close to 0%, so no need to add them to the mix.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Court_of_Human_Rights
> It depends on whether you're the one paying for someone's learning curve.

When I was consulting, I would occasionally make a time box deal with the client. One project sticks out to me: I thought their project was perfectly suited to Rails at the time, but the majority of my projects had been done in Django. “I’m going to try building this in Rails. When I hit a 40h timebox, I’m going to stop, look at progress so far with a critical eye, and assess whether we’re getting value from this or not. If I don’t think so, I’ll abandon the Rails project and start over for free with Django.”

As it turned out, the whole thing was done in about 30h with Rails and we didn’t need to have the rest of that conversation.
> The original "Federal Express" logo wasn't bad, but FEDEX rocks it hard.

I will give you this one, but…

> Some of the old LEGO logos aren't great…

True, but in the context of my original question, I don't think it's reasonable for me to have an opinion about rebrands that occurred before I became aware of the brand, and LEGO has been using the same logo since I got set 20 in 1977.

I _do_ vaguely recall the old Federal Express slanty logo, but I must admit I don't remember the rebrand _as such_, so I'm not sure how much I can count this one. But yes: a good example of a definite win as far as rebrands go.
Actually we're speaking English, and not Greek or Latin, so we add an 's' or 'es'.

Just because some English professor assholes wanted to show off their knowledge of foreign languages in the 17-19th centuries, doesn't mean we should follow those rules now. They are responsible for a lot of the confusion and horrible English rules that users of English now have to deal with. I say shit on their horrible legacy.
it's not a matter of performance but expressibility.

const y = await remote_model_a(x) // different machine
const z = await remote_model_b(y) // different machine
await z.backward()

is trivially pipelined when run in parallel. With multithreading suddenly the backing C++ library has to be aware of this and figure things out for you
I always felt the problem with consequentialism is that outcomes are uncertain, whereas actions are not. Therefore you are not guaranteed that an immoral action (means) will result in a beneficial outcome (end).

For instance, you push someone in front of a trolley to save 5 lives, but the trolley isn’t stopped and you end up with 6 dead.
Here's another individual speaking on behalf of a corporation and at the very center of the FTX collapse

> It's sort of funny hearing people claim that you can't create/redeem USDT for $.

> Like, I don't know what to tell you, you can, and we do.

https://twitter.com/sbf_ftx/status/1349096853346816001
> 1a) Think influx of a few 1000s of users is bad? How about a billion? [1]

Imo, that's a W for Mastodon, not a L.

> I think the Fediverse community would do good to think up strategies how to counter EEE takeovers right now, because if at some point Mastodon becomes big enough that there is money or influence to be made by controlling the platform, then someone will try a takeover, sooner or later.

That's exactly what happened with email, but haven't folks at Matrix/Elemental built a nice playbook to tackle this? Mastodon can and should be its own company. Today, it largely remains a work of just one eng, and incredibly so!
Is there any reason for anyone to stay at twitter? I’ve not seen Musk offer any upside anywhere to remaining. He’s laying out a stark plan of hard work and fewer benefits and a brutal management. What reason other than inability to find another job (perhaps due to visa status, the hiring freezes at end of year, and layoffs) does anyone have for working at twitter now? I’m shocked if they don’t see another 50+% voluntary attrition in 2023.
Parent comment doesn't seem to only be talking about prices. He's talking about Safari being the only browser on iOS. Other vendors are only allowed to reskin it.
It took me way to long to see that Like " ... " meant the emote on the message.
Aren't microplastics already in chickens? Do they get passed to the eggs? If so, where do you filter microplastics first. . . the chicken or the egg?
For me personally though it's less about being judged (the shaming part) than it is about whether or not what I'm doing is actually causing change to happen.

If there isn't critical mass, the owners won't change anything, and it unfortunately does end up punishing the servers instead of the owners.
There is LineageOS now, https://wiki.lineageos.org/devices/sargo/

The most recent Pixels get a few extra years of only security updates after regular updates run out. So at least they have improved the policy somewhat now.

It would be great if Google went ahead and fixed this problem in particular for more devices, though.
I get this, but also peering out a narrow plane window at a view which is often at least substantially blocked by wing is not always fun.

I would like airlines to put a 360 degree camera system mounted to the exterior, and pipe through the feed either to a channel in an in-seat screen, or make it available to passengers wearing a VR headset. Imagine one of these much wider planes where many more seats are middle seats -- but where you can sit down, put on a VR headset, and get a clear image of the view in every direction.
If fewer people will have a window in these future planes, and most awake people are looking at an entertainment system anyways, I would like the airline to pipe through a feed from a 360 degree camera mounted on the outside. Imagine sitting in a middle seat, comforted by the fact that you can put on a VR headset and
> a) work at Twitter and other startups which requires 60+ hours of work. High workload / High Reward

Twitter is not a startup, and my understanding is startups are only "high reward" if your bet pays off (e.g. you got in early enough AND the startup was successful enough).

> Most devs are completely out of touch about the economic reality. Now they have to work hard like the rest of other industries.

Your a/b binary choice is out of touch in its own way.
Single Hubble image captured supernova at three different times
Germany dominates EU. The French-German duo have been cooperating for years now. The limits prior to Putin's folly were on German militarization. The French required that given the history between the two. For years in fact there have been vocal voices asking Germany to politically act according to its economic stature.

This singling out of Germany from Europe is Russian propaganda. The core message, as you obviously have learned, is "US is keeping Europe under its thumbs because it is afraid of losing its dominance." What they neglected to add was that this is also the position of many European elites, who do -not- want to go back to Europe before Pax Americana.

In fact, just as in US, so too in Europe and Asia, there is a division amongst the elite regarding the current global regime. It is clear why a loser like Russia would want this, but would say Japan or Taiwan, or France, or even Germany, want to go back to a world where 'balance of powers' and periodic 'big wars' are par per course?

As for US, that bill from Pentagon is not just for 'keeping America safe'. No. It is the price of the replacement of the British Empire and its maintenance of global finance and trade. That shit costs a lot of money. So if we decide to go "multi-polar", we no longer have to spend that much money - let the East Asians duke it out over who controls the island chains. US will remain a powerhouse in every way.

p.s.

re-read the above and the point is opaque. The 'cost' of living in the American era for other countries is possibility of having to sacrifice their national interest in the interest of the global order. US does this routinely btw (which gets a certain subset of Americans quite upset as you know) and so it's not just asking say Germany to give up cheap Russian oil. Remember us giving a whole chunk of our industrial base to China? That was not in our purely national interest but it was in the interest of having a peaceful global order. China had to be integrated.

So, this is my recommendation for all "multi-polar" fans. Reflect on this: WW3, if it happens, will happen post multi-polarity. Just like #1 and #2 followed the breakdown of Concert of Europe in 19th century.
Nobody ever claimed they did, but it is an investment, with insurance.

If you want something more financial a short vertical spread [0] is a strategy in which you are purchasing insurance on the risk (investment) you just took (made). There are many such investments of this form.

[0] https://www.optionsplaybook.com/option-strategies/short-call...
fwiw, I believe if you ask anyone who has interacted with any of the relevant (to competition) agencies globally, any law/rule which gives them more power is obviously bad. The humans who work there tend to be clueless about the specifics of an industry and imagine all kinds of nefarious intent everywhere. They are often intelligent people, but just don't understand the industry.
Kinda unkind to imply immigrants are not civilized.
What's most likely to happen:

1. She'll ask for a raise.

2. She won't get a raise.

3. She'll move to a new company.

Depending on the company point 2 might not look like an outright "no". It could be a soft "we'll see" / "let's wait to review time" / "we can give you this great new project with new responsibilities and maybe if that goes great" which keeps some people around for a bit longer without giving them a raise.
You probably were seeing a respring (restart of the UI processes) not a reboot.
I do not believe that it is acceptable to consider as equivalent actions the search through a house or other property, or a body search, with reading the memory of a computer or of a smartphone or even with the reading of a (possibly encrypted) notebook.

Any external memory, regardless whether it is a flash memory, a magnetic disk, an optical disc, or just a piece of paper, is just an extension of the memory from your brain.

Admitting that there is a reason for anyone else but the owner to read a memory device is the same with admitting that they have the right to obtain any information that is stored inside your brain.

Even if for now the only technical means for obtaining the information stored in the brain is torture, that may change any time, if someone will ever discover how the biological memories are stored.

When that will happen, it will be too late to claim that physical search is not the same thing with reading memories, if this is not already established now.

Even this French court decision is just a method of using torture for obtaining the information stored in the brain memory of a person.

Because they can no longer use a good beating with "nerf de boeuf" for obtaining the information from the suspect, the beating is replaced as a torture method with the threat of imprisonment and of a huge fine, this being supposedly a more civilized technique.
The recent Sebastian Mallaby book about VC charts the growth of this "founder rules" approach.

In the age of ESG, it turns out that the "G" part is being ignored totally (because it counter to the interests of insiders) but the "E" and "S" is ever more important (because it is in the interests of insiders) despite it doing little to help improve returns (SBF was the king of "S"...might there be a correlation between saying you are more ethical than anyone and permitting yourself to steal from customers?).
> society will think you’re a cheap asshole who’s disrespecting your server

Tipping in a restaurant where someone is waiting on you is different but, I have zero problems with refusing to tip at the register in retail stores, or for carry out orders at restaurants. I think we can collectively decide against that without fear of being ostracized by society. There's no "norm" right now that says I have to tip someone for a retail transaction, but there is pressure being put on us to normalize it so that businesses can save on labor expenses. Just say no.
It may be that what the FDIC promises to do is not in sync with what it can actually afford to do.
>We’re doing zero fractional reserve banking now.

No; we're not. In fact, banks are positively awash with reserves by historical standards.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/TOTRESNS
He’s a web guy in the same way that Rudy Giuliani is an expert in criminal law. It was true in the 90s but definitely not anymore.
Looks bad for Intel in the datacenter. I hope both Intel and AMD can stay in business long term, or at least until there are other serious contenders.
It's a random-walk of blues riffs over a stock diatonic chord progression with a slow (and predictable) harmonic rhythm.

The only conceivable surprise is a crude chromatic key change to the minor version of the raised mediant.

You'd think the precision of those dynamic envelopes and timbral games would push the artist to venture out and explore that mediant relationship to create quicker and more jarring harmonic progressions and modulations. But no-- it turns out to be less inventive than the mediant chains emanating from, say, Joni Mitchell and her acoustic guitar over fifty years ago:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3q2jiRUVLgI

(I find some of the lyrics apt, too.)

Compared to the cookie-cutter harmony and melody of the music you linked, even Mitchell's augmented triad in the melody at the end of the chorus sounds like the musical equivalent of solving fast homomorphic encryption.

It's the the audio tech that is on display in the music you linked, so every other musical consideration shifts to the background to illuminate that tech. I get that. But holy shit why does that baseline have to be stuck in the fucking 1650s? While I love the "electrified Vivaldi" hack that is heavy metal from the late 70s/early 80s (Master of Puppets et al), I question whether we really need more than one musical genre based on that parlor trick.

It would be like every stand up comedian ending their set with increasingly theatrical pyrotechnic pull-my-finger jokes. I could laugh my ass off at the absurdity for a year, maybe two. But forever?
And how do you find "the people carrying the previous culture" and other deadwood?

You have to observe them over several weeks/months. But Elon didn't do this at all. He is about as likely to have fired the best people as the worst people.
Because he was superb since before then, for four decades now. I read Liar's Poker and was hooked from the first sentence.

Look, Michael Lewis is like the Stephen Gaghan of (semi-fictionalized) socioeconomic zeitgeist: he chronicles concepts paradigmatic of an entire generation, people and personalities that affect or transform an entire decade or generation (usually in or about the US, and often Wall Street). And he nods towards the societal implications with a sense of urgency and inevitability but also dark theater. Sure he Hollywoodizes people and quotes, not dissimilar to how the screen adaptation of Mark Bowden's superb 'Black Hawk Down' merged characters and their story arcs, or how loosely 'War Dogs' (2016) was based on Guy Lawson's 2011 Rolling Stone article [0] and 2015 book [1]. [As to 'War Dogs' and Lawson's writings, there's an obvious similar moral fable to three potheads from Miami Beach becoming in 2007 one of the Pentagon’s largest weapons suppliers, by reselling Chinese bullets to US-occupied Afghanistan, and noone at the Pentagon actually wanted to know where private contractors were getting their supply, as the scale of the contracts became increasingly insane.] If you want to more accurately label Lewis' genre "semi-fictionalized socioeconomic zeitgeist", then do.

To be blunt, people have short attention spans, people in the US only read average 15.6 books/yr or median 4 books/yr [2], and moral ambiguity seems to sell worse than clean-cut tales casting characters as good guys and bad guys, certainly on the big screen. But these writers are still fulfilling an important service. Noone actually sits down and reads Inspector-General reports, CSPAN is occasionally great but usually dull to watch, and what now passes for US mainstream media is hopelessly coopted and long ago abandoned investigative reporting [3]. Writers like Lewis, Bowden, Lawson(, Crichton, Grisham [4]) fill a very real cultural void in interpreting what's going on.

[0]: https://www.rollingstone.com/feature/the-stoner-arms-dealers...
[1]: https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/the-comple...
[2]: https://katiecouric.com/culture/book-guide/how-many-books-do...
[3]: https://www.fastcompany.com/90646413/why-breaking-points-wit...
[4]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33391995
Introduction to Kubernetes Part 4 – Pod Security Standards
How is charging for a website that is currently free going to increase total users? It makes no sense.
he should be made to pay 1 billion million trillion dollars.

his ability to pay my made up number is about on par with his ability to pay the courts made up number, at this point it's just political theatre and schadenfreude.
If you have an account in HN, something tells me you have flipped some coins.
Where Kids Learn to Work in Teams and Make Decisions
Why would any competent engineer sign up to work in the environment Musk has created? I’ve seen no upside to employees offered, only brutal management and benefit reduction with a promise of hard work for less.
It’s pretty laughable you believe your own “math.”
I guess even serving an actual front end doesn’t factor into your calculations. Hey go build something and you might find out what it actually takes to build/maintain a system of any real consequence instead of doing leet code exercises and smelling your own brain farts.
Yes, one day, people are not going to talk to each other anymore, at least not using computers, they're just going to use those to consume content created by their betters.
Pop it into archive.is or dot tv
Their net profit was all over the place for the last 5 years including a big net loss during the pandemic.
This isn't an unknowable hypothetical. No need to presume anything. Markdown found in the wild is a mess. The GitHub Flavored Markdown renderer even encourages it.
I mentioned this is another reply, so sorry for anyone who reads both.

I would read Mallaby's history of the VC industry to see why this isn't possible. Around 1997 the balance of power shifted heavily in favour of founders (this is when dual-share class) started, and they stopped demanding seats on the board.

Iirc, Sequoia was a firm that held out (along with other old-style funds), they missed out on a lot of companies over the next ten years so ended up racing to the bottom...this is how we got here.

Btw, just on corporate governance...it is the most important factor for a company. A lot of the issues with corporates we have today are due to poor oversight from shareholders (not helped by passive). If corporate governance isn't working, capitalism won't work either.
But it s not a neutral decision. It is likely you are left with the employees who are willing to tolerate a worse lifestyle for the paycheck, and you are letting go employees who are smart enough to prefer to have more control of their lives.
Apple iCloud Photos now compatible with Windows 11 Photos
I admit I had the timeframe wrong, but whether it generates revenue was not part of the question.
Guide to the (CPython) Parser
The post's fundamental premise is wrong. LLVM bitcode is not architecture agnostic and never has been. Apple also has used it once, to move from 32 bit to 64 bit on watchOS. That was possible, but only because the armv7k and arm64_32 ABIs were developed together to ensure it would work.
> If you accept that a search of property can be ordered then that implies that authority can compel you to actually see the search through.

Except, it doesn't. If police present a warrant at your door they can't force you to help them open the bank vault in your basement.

> If someone was screaming in a trunk and cars had unbreakable locks, that wouldn't be a justification to not compel the driver to open it.

Now you've moved the goalposts from "search and seizure" to "crime actively in progress". These things are not the same, ethically or legally.
Inaccessible to enemy tanks, yes. The UK, Switzerland, Australia, Japan, etc all benefit from the fact that it is very hard to march an army into their territory and thus they can build factories and infrastructure confident tjhey're not going to be destroyed, and engage in trade freely confident that they are not empowering someone who will destroy them.
Qualcomm comes to mind too.
Then why did Twitter's top lawyers just quit? You're being optimistic in expecting Twitter's legal team were even told about this plan in advance, considering HR wasn't.
Horizontal stabilizers above the rudder went away with the engines mounted on the body in the back, the reason for the high tail was to keep the elevators away from the jet blast of the engines.

As to why create a design like that in the first place, I don't know. My understanding is that the 'engines under the wings' layout won because with the engines in the back the fuselage needs to be stronger (and thus heavier) to support the engines.

(Business jets tend to still have the engines in the back layout, because mounting the engines high allows shorter landing gear so that a stair that is part of the door is enough to board the plane, no need for an external stair. But that's not much of a consideration for a passenger plane operating out of airports with infrastructure available.)
English is my second language, so, I might be missing some nuance.

Indeed you are, but had I known English was your 2nd language it would have made more sense and I probably wouldn't have even corrected you since your English is very good.