skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I've worked on plenty of multi-account projects, and never felt a need to use Organizations. So far as I can tell from this, it allows you to attach permissions to roles in multiple sub-accounts - why wouldn't you be able to use CDK for that?
What's also interesting is that decision-making power is very rarely fully centralized in large financial companies. Boards of directors, fiduciary duties, third-party audits, attorneys, and so on, all structurally serve to decentralize decision making. There is, of course, individual variability, and such structures are not always successful.... E.g. I've read that the board of FTX wasn't an independent board in any meaningful sense.
By force, if necessary.
Winter is the coldest period where you always require to heat (in northern Europe), but you still need to heat your house in autumn and spring.
I usually start my gas boiler in October, but this year I started it only last week because we had 20-25 °C through the month, it felt like summer
Creole (WikiCreole) markup language (2007)
> FTX US and FTX [dot] com initiated precautionary steps to move all digital assets to cold storage

What assets?
Troll actually means a similar thing!
Shame poorly run companies and stop using them. Mainstream’s insistence on conflating this with crypto masks the proper shaming of mismanaged companies.
About 30-40% of my engineering team prefer spending 2-3 days a week in the office, if we’re doing anecdata.
Fine.

launches bittorrent client on the phone
If there were a clear and well-regulated equivalent of Tether, with obvious and transparent dollar-backing, I suspect it would find a lot of usage.

Might cost $1.15 to mint a new USD-coin redeemable for $1.00, but I suspect there would be an appetite.

Massive volatility and the occasional collapse of a crypto-bank are probably hindering the appetite of many people for anything in the crypto market. That population probably would dwarf any yield-farmers.
Give it time. Twitter has been miss managed for years, it needs a shake up and its going to take time for the peaces to fall in to place.

For all the people who say Elon is out of his depth, remember all the people who said he was out of his depths when making a car company, or trying to go to space. Many fortunes have been lost betting against him. Will he succeed? I have no idea, but I would not bet against him in the long run.
If there's only 5-10 people a day, they should be getting nice offices rather than the typical open plan. That might actually entice others to come in.

In lots of tv shows the high-social-value characters have very nice offices (ie, it has a door and a couch).
I'd go in-person for one of those.
Naturally, when the US:

• copied the Soviet anti-tank dog programme[0];

• glued bags filled with napalm to bats bodies and caged the live bats inside a bomb casing[1];

• used foxes caught in China and Australia whose fur was painted with a radioactive radium paint[2] to have them released on Japanese shores to unleash rampant fear onto the superstitious Japanese;

– the US did it in the name of democracy and freedom of humanity. And when the British procured and euthanasied hundred of rats to fill their bodies with explosives[3], they did it in the name of His Majesty the King and to defend and to save the British Empire.

Granted, the Soviets were the preantepenultimate evil with their anti-tank dogs, and nothing else counts.

[0] «In 1943, U.S. forces considered using armed dogs against fortifications. The aim was for a dog to run into a bunker carrying a bomb, which would then be detonated by a timer. Dogs in this secret program were trained at Fort Belvoir. The dogs, called "demolition wolves", were taught to run to a bunker, enter it, and sit while waiting for a simulated explosion. Each dog carried a bomb strapped to its body in canvas pouches, as with the Russian method» – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-tank_dog#Use_by_other_cou...

[1] «The bat bomb was conceived by Lytle S. Adams (1881-1970), a dental surgeon from Irwin, Pennsylvania who was an acquaintance of First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt […] In his letter, Adams stated that the bat was the "lowest form of animal life", and that, until now, "reasons for its creation have remained unexplained". He went on to espouse that bats were created "by God to await this hour to play their part in the scheme of free human existence, and to frustrate any attempt of those who dare desecrate our way of life." Of Adams, Roosevelt remarked, "This man is not a nut. It sounds like a perfectly wild idea but is worth looking into» – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bat_bomb#cite_note-Couffer-4

[2] «The United States Radium Corporation provided an answer in the form of its glow-in-the-dark paint, which contained radium. The health risks associated with the paint weren’t unknown. As early as 1917, women detailing watch dials with the luminous paint suffered from anemia, bone fractures, and necrosis of the jaw, a result of them using their pursed lips to shape the contaminated brush tips into a fine point. Despite that danger, the OSS continued with Operation Fantasia» – https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/unsuccessful-wwii-plo...

[3] «But the most exotic device was the "explosive rat". A hundred of the rodents were procured by an SOE officer posing as a student needing them for laboratory experiments. The rats were skinned, filled with plastic explosive, and sewn up. The idea was to place a rat among coal beside a boiler. When they were spotted, they would immediately be thrown on to the fire, causing a huge explosion» – https://www.theguardian.com/uk/1999/oct/27/richardnortontayl...
Tweet Emotion – The Chrome extension to show the sentiment of tweets on timeline
Savory like a main course? Or full of umami similar to cheese or soy sauce? And by crispy do you mean like lettuce or like chips or like a crisp wine?

There's no good way to describe new food, comparisons are useful though they can be used to mislead your expectations.
> Is there any crypto out there without humans ?

What OP is referring to is that you don't need to trust people if the dex is on-chain and verifiable. FTX was a non-transparent and insolvent centralized exchange which wouldn't be possible if it was on-chain because anyone can see the funds that are available and the protocol would not allow leverage backed by non-existing collateral.

> Is there an undo button to reverse the transaction?

No there isn't. This is a double edge sword.

> All financial systems involve humans

To a degree, but centralized exchanges have more knobs controlled by humans while an on-chain dex and just be deployed once and require no human intervention. A dex can be audited fully on-chain and anyone can see if the contract has any master holder keys. The FTX fiasco is because they own all your crypto because they have the master keys. The future of finance is people being in charge of their own money and where no unexpected entity can arbitrarily inflate the supply, which is only possible with crypto.
Google SWE explains how Google Maps change from 2D projection to 3D globe view
Exactly. I feel absolutely certain that it was sabotage. But the presence of unknown military ships doesn't prove it. That is very strong evidence but technically it could be a freak coincidence. The stronger proof is the condition of the pipes, obviously sabotaged. That's evidence strong enough to reasonably call "proof."
There is the same undo button that exists for every other financial institution that commits fraud: lawsuits.
No technically. There are seemingly endless ways to move funds anonymously.
Yes. One of the biggest ironies is that the very best approach to open forum discussion is applied to some of the least useful uses of the application. The UI is as slapped together and confronting as the conversations but the proper branching graph system could make everything from search to navigation to LLM AI digestion of huge messaging systems just work better.
Makes me wonder if you can even build something like this, if decentralized systems must spend more time filtering junk, on a system which makes it easy to send it, it will always be too easy for malevolent actors to takedown.

Unless you can incur a significant cost to these activities, e.g. requiring social capital (burning social capital with e.g. hate/disinformation), or physical (e.g. access requires boxes which cost some small fee and can be blacklisted)...

Perhaps some of mastodon inefficient behavior can be leveraged here?
>Their established reputation

The reason trustless decentralized crypto currencies were invented: So we don't have to rely on banking corporation's glowing reputations.
> (...) the fediverse, the network of mastodon servers, (...)

This sentence at the very start already makes no sense. The above snippet makes as much sense as calling Web a network of nginx and Apache servers since nginx and Apache combined serve the majority of all web traffic.

There are services like Pleroma, Friendica, Misskey, Pixelfed, Write.as, PeerTube, and other Activity-Pub-speaking software which are NOT Mastodon or its forks. The author mentions these other pieces of software later, but pulling them them as "some part of mastodon" is at best a misnomer.

And it's been written about countless times already. See https://bofh.social/notice/APTBaDyBOOvNAzaeqO for a relatively fresh list.
side view, male, police uniform
There have been stranger coincidences
> However the size of a codebase in terms of its features and components is almost always directly correlated to the numbers of bugs you're likely to find and the difficulty you'll have maintaining it.

Fully agree. In addition, I find there's also the time component. Because requirements for existing functionality change over time, both code and data become inaccurate and a mess if they are not refactored. This leads to more bugs and to less trust in the data model (e.g. when can something be null).
side view, male
If you've been keeping up with your claim filings you should get around 1.1 to 1.25 BTC (estimate from https://blog.wizsec.jp/2021/02/mtgox-claim-calculator.html?m...)
male side view
Don't Wait for Motivation, Act for Momentum
I'm pretty sure the whole point of the policy (looking at what Elon Musk had been tweeting) was to "democratize" the feature.

Why would anyone pay for a "verification that you can pay for" if it was anything other than the verification everyone knows of.
I'd be interested to get a source in that. To my knowledge, the big three pure microblogging stacks, Mastodon, Pleorama, and Soapbox, have no such controls. Everything posted is always fully public, it only limited who gets automatically notified of the new posts under certain conditions ("DM" doesn't notify all followers, but it's still funny visible in feeds).
If you're taking about something on Friendica or Hubzilla, you very well could be right, or maybe it's just not a feature I've seen it heard about from anyone before.
Right now stablecoins are a pretty profitable business because of interest rates.

An attestation report available 24/7 should be generated easily if you’re doing things properly, as well as frictionless burning and minting.

Note: I work for Glo, a non-profit stablecoin, so have a vested interest in this space. I do not and am not speaking on behalf of our group.
I would like this to be a rogue white-hat. Anybody have a theory?
> It does this by putting a bit of the bank’s own capital at risk and levering that capital using the deposits in the checking accounts.

This is not at all how modern banking works!
Depositor Insurance probably... But still, every single promise has been burnt in the crypto world.
Thankfully the internet archive exists :
https://web.archive.org/web/20221108093757/https://crowd-jpe...
All crypto currencies are a ponzi scheme. Change my mind.
Go isn't polymorphic enough as a language to achieve something akin to JEE, Rails, Django or Laravel, so these "go frameworks" will have hard time encapsulating the complexity of underlying libraries they might use. All the former use either an IoC container, or their own flavor of "module loading". This is absolutely not practical in Go.

Of course, dependency injection is possible, explicitly, but can hardly be generalized an efficient way, so the plumbing will always be explicit, because the underlying lib types will always leak.

So it's not so much that there is no value in frameworks in Go, it just hard to write actual web frameworks in that language that would be useful.
There wasn't much to verify as far as I can remember.
Banks interact with the legal system at every level.

So yes there maybe terrible human behaviour at times but very quickly it results in either (a) people being fined or going to jail or (b) laws improving to prevent it e.g. KYC/AML.

Also as someone who works at a bank there is a lot of code which governs what people can and can't do.
There are even more mistakes in the article. Pretty terrible all around. It's best for patio11 to delete it.
Okay? Didn't we just see the irresponsible usage of it lead to massive stock devaluations in a few days? Or you think damages worth 20B (half of twitter's valuation, btw) are a funny joke?

It's clear the influence of the platform is reasonably big and I will quote spider-man here: "with big power, comes big responsibility".
Walmart Is Flexing Its Muscle Again
I'm paying for 25G of data a month. How I want to use it should be entirely up to me.
That doesn’t change OPs point though.
Pine is not a good wood and it requires a ton of work to finish it (plaster board, stopping and paint). It’s only attribute is that it grows fast.

Another issue is that building sites have massive wastage. It’s just so demoralising walking past their skips. If walls were prefabricated and shipped it would be hard to do worse than NZs current standard, even with shipping from a long distance.

I’ve seen over ordered materials just binned rather than collected and returned or sold.
Yes, and the social contract is that if you post to the tool which is designed exclusively to broadcast your message publicly, it's ok to broadcast it publicly. If you wanted a social contract of limited visibility, then a tool which includes or supports that would be a good first step.
That post has zero evidence the fake prison is "specifically designed for the capture and torture of crypto owners."

For all we know it was used to torture political enemies with maybe the odd crypto bro on the side.
My team seems to have roughly 40% prefer full-remote, 40% prefer hybrid, 20% prefer full office.
Check the "awesome go" repository: https://github.com/avelino/awesome-go. You could look under ORM and Web Frameworks.
I'd agree embedded is a pretty niche area, and that it's likely not a killer app for Nim. Though it does bring a fair bit of attention.

However Rust doesn't dominate embedded. That's still C or even C++.

Rust has a lot of embedded crates, but supports a pretty small subset of hardware given the number of crates and amount of effort poured into them. The trait system particularly sucks for modeling hardware, IMHO, and with the "re-write the world" mentality it means there's still quite a bit of pain.

So it seems rosier than it actually is -- for now. Rust on embedded is gaining momentum.
Maybe a very long shot but in an earlier thread from a year or so ago about a similar topic, this HN user mentioned being in a Theranos facility during liquidation: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29791488

Perhaps they’d be a good first step.

Good luck, that’d be a hell of a find.
We have been through this argument many times. Here's Tog at Apple in 1989:

https://www.asktog.com/TOI/toi06KeyboardVMouse1.html

And even then, it was old news. There was behavioural research in the 70s, the same kind that was used for designing cockpits (and which saved lives), showing that modal interfaces were undesirable.

It can well be that you're a god with vim. But odds are, then, that you could have been a god with modern CUA-derived interfaces too (or with Emacs) if you'd put similar effort into it.
CTO from startup to scaleup. (learn to fire yourself)
> I suspect the $185k application fee may go down a bit

Honestly, my expectation would be that the application fee will go up, because the first round received so many terrible applications (like brand TLDs that the trademark owner had no intention of using).
How do you know it's him and not somebody else with the same name? I don't see any crypto projects.
Ooh, that's a good one. Who on earth would underwrite such a thing?
You're welcome! It's remarkable how useful a few lines of shell script running from a cron job have been.
The debts are a choice though, he could just sell other assets if he didn't want that.
Mental Models to Help You Cut Your Losses
I stand corrected on this point. Bloomberg is reporting that SBF's Robinhood stake was apparently held through Alameda and may have been used as collateral for loans.
So, did Madoff's victims just end up with normal returns like they would have gotten any other way?
The claim is that PayPal keeps user funds separately from the funds that PayPal e.g. uses to pay for operating expenses.
People keep saying this, but I don't follow. FTT was a token manufactured out of thin air. Crypto works as a concept, I suppose, but people saying crypto works is like the people that say Agile works. How long do we have to wait to see crypto working? Where are the success stories of crypto? There's a long laundry list of hacks, scams, company failures, "tokenomics", NFTs, <x> on blockchain, etc. Saying crypto works as a technology base is not enough. Currencies and tradeable "assets" are a social thing. It isn't just a technology.
Is this refuting a claim that is actually made? Do people claim exceptions never have overhead on the happy path in C++?

As an analogy, forget exceptions for a moment—just imagine plain function calls in C++ vs. Python. In Python, function calls always have overhead. In C++, though, we say function calls don't add overhead, because function calls can be inlined. But when we make that claim, we obviously don't mean function calls never have overhead in C++—obviously, the statement can't apply if you can't inline the call. Rather, the meaning of the claim is that function calls don't inherently introduce overhead—i.e. if they do, it's because of some other fact (like inability to inline), not the mere existence of the function call itself.

The case seems similar to me here. When people say exceptions don't slow down the happy path, they don't mean this is impossible. They just mean that if this does occur, it's due to additional inherent obstacles beyond the mere enablement of exceptions (e.g., opaque function calls).
> The cost for fully remote employees is £9k pa

I'm really surprised by such high figure. How was this clalculated?
Ponzi schemes by definition use opaque ledgers. Ponzi schemes are custodial. Ponzi schemes guarantee returns.

There exist Ponzi schemes which have disguised themselves as cryptocurrencies, but the idea that all cryptocurrencies are Ponzi schemes demonstrates a complete ignorance of what a Ponzi scheme is.
Warren Buffet hasn't beaten the S&P 500 in a while.

> Look at valuation differences between single tenant net lease retail stocks, for example. The biggest edge will be in smaller cap and less followed names. And there are thousands of them. Pretty easy to find small cap peers in RE that have better growth, same risk profile, and much lower valuation multiples, for example

Less liquid markets are less efficient. People who go and exploit these mispricings help make the prices better, and the market pays them for it. (But that only works for as long as there are mispricings.)

> Is cloudflare a good investment now at 12-15x sales?

Please short cloudfare and make some easy money.
> I don't see any crypto projects.

How do you know that? It says explicitly: "52 contributions in private repositories" between November 1 and November 11.
There is a better formatted version here: https://data.iana.org/TLD/tlds-alpha-by-domain.txt
Earlier discussion" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33512338
Somehow other countries make it work.
It would need a legal, non-speculation use-case that isn’t much better solved by extant centralised systems
This isn't crypto. This is a centralized exchange with a centralized website, with centralized databases, that is run and controlled by humans. In fact, if you use a centralized exchange there is no use of blockchain for the most part.

There's a literal saying, "Not your keys, not your coins". Only if people would listen.
I've been playing piano for ~25 years. I pretty quickly gravitated away from learning existing pieces towards composition and improv. I'm slow at reading sheet music and can't sight read, but for playing new songs I can generally just look at the chords and get something at least close enough to sing over right away. Just messing around making stuff up is a lot more relaxing than learning by rote I think. Of course I'm never going to play Piano Concerto No. 21 so it depends what you want out of life. :)

The best example of "relaxed piano playing" I can think of is actually the old Build Mode music from The Sims[0]. I'm 90% sure that all those piano tracks are just someone messing around improvising over a few simple chords, because it sounds so much like what comes out when I'm doing the same kind of thing.

Now, it's always a little stressful to record that kind of playing because if you play something bad sounding then you'll have to start over (or at least, splice multiple takes together), but if you're just playing the piano for fun, I think it mostly is relaxing.

Have you ever tried just playing some chords in the left hand and kind of letting the right hand do what it feels like?

[0] Here's Build 3 for example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gGHQicQUw4

----

Edit: Looks like that YouTube video actually links to an article which confirms my old suspicion that it's improv piano:

> "When Russo and Martin couldn't quite capture that wistfulness themselves, they called Burr. A successful jazz pianist in his own right as well as a highly sought-after session musician, he was comfortable working off of Martin's ideas (and, unlike Russo, he was a pianist by trade rather than a saxophonist). Burr says he loved the cut-and-paste style of recording that Martin employed. It was a case, he says, of "just looking at Jerry and asking, 'Does this sound like what you want?'" So, while Russo went away and worked on his pieces only to see them chopped up by Martin, Burr was happy improvising."
I did the Model Mania 2001 part 1 challenge in a little under 18 minutes. The part 2 challenge involved only changing the 45 deg to 55 and the height of the center of the bore, so less than a minute.

I know Fusion 360 but it's amazing how fast Onshape can be.
Twitter Blocks Mediaite Post Critical of Elon Musk
Also, a lot of explosives was used. A lot more than what would have destoyed the pipes. So not only were the pipes sabotaged, whoever did it wanted to make it obvious.
Maybe it was an intel then, not a g4… definitely had magsafe!
There's endless ways to move cash.

If/when the movement of cash/crypto is peer-to-peer or interacting with a machine only (a machine that gives quarters for dollar bills or a DEX, for example) KYC is entirely unnecessary.
*self-driving car company. He hasn't delivered on that yet.
What foogazi was perhaps suggesting is that no financial system can work if it doesn't account for fundamental human behavior - we make mistakes and we are greedy if not held accountable "off chain".

The blockchain is perfect when everyone acts in good faith and makes no mistakes.

In the real world, that's not the case. Unfortunately, you need centralized institutions to regulate financial transactions, control the supply of money and enforce laws when they're broken, reverse mistakes when they happen.

> The future of finance is people being in charge of their own money and where no unexpected entity can arbitrarily inflate the supply, which is only possible with crypto.

This is not the future, and it'll almost certainly never happen with crypto.