skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Seasonally adjusted != multiply by 12

My brain swapped annualised with seasonally adjusted. Sorry.
What a great feature!

Is the author of that feature here?

If so, I want to know how they could develop such a feature and be so quiet about it.

It's like someone baking a birthday cake and then dropping it down an abandoned well.

Just imagine how much more productive we'd all be if Vim bros were as loud as the crypto bros over the past decade!
Who could have possibly seen such a thing coming.

I don’t think he is going to climb out of this one. There is no way large brands will ever see him as anything other than a liability at this point when they were already extremely on the fence about advertising on Twitter to begin with.
I still can't reconcile how fast this happened. Back in April SBF was willing to give billions to buy Twitter. It seemed like there was plenty of surplus or was the money he planned to invest just FTX customer holdings?

"Musk responded to the text by asking if Bankman-Fried had “huge amounts of money?” MacAskill said SBF was worth about US$24 billion at the time and could be willing to provide as much as US$8 billion to US$15 billion in financing." [1]

[1] https://forkast.news/sbf-wanted-to-join-elon-musk-twitter-de...
The new remote work reality and the struggle for talents
This either isn't true or nobody has noticed yet. It's on all sorts of EU sites.
We already eat various forms of algae. Some are quite nutritious, some give us tummy troubles, some at excellent sinks for CO2.

I'm very curious if we could mass manufacture something like algae and then pyrolize it to get fuel and solid carbon to sequester.

If we find some good ideas for kelp, there's whole coastlines whose kelp forests have been decimated. We could start propagating and sustainably harvesting it and provide an incredibly rich coastal habitat.
One law enforcement officer was hit in the leg. They had a "No knock warrant" but then have testified that they knocked and identified themselves as police before breaking down the door in plainclothes. Color me unconvinced.

They then proceeded to basically cover their eyes and shoot 32 shots while spinning around blindly like Barney Fife, hit Breonna Taylor 6 times as well as firing shots through a random glass door to the patio and miraculously didn't kill or hit anyone else in the apartment complex.
Is the fact that Fukushima was built in a poor location with poorly designed generators part of nuclear's failure to deliver on safety promises? That is to say, if nuclear power cannot reliably avoid design failures then that sounds to me like it is failing to deliver on safety promises.
Reddits new format has made it remarkably difficult to have the content you're looking for get picked up the by the indexer.

That site has had a detrimental shift in terms of quality, indexability, accessibility and countless other "ilities" from that single "redesign".
The "bureaucrats" are elected officials so if people weren't in favour of it, they would stop electing MEPs that vote in favour of it.
Floor796
I wonder if it could add support for pretending to be a tty for the benefit of programs where the current approach doesn't work (ex. static binaries).
The article says:

The act of undoing need only become part of our linear history if we squash the proverbial butterfly and thus alter "the past"; in that case the act of undoing itself is instantly recorded as a series of changes, by replaying the redo stack onto the undo stack twice: 1) Forwards, for the original changes 2) and then backwards, to record the history of our undoing.

By squash the proverbial butterfly and thus alter "the past" they mean make an edit after undoing.
This is a popular topic of discussion among incels who think that women won't have anything to do with a man who is say, 5′ 4″.

I've discussed incel ideology with several women, who deny it vociferously until it gets to the "heightpill", at which point there is a definite shift in the mood, often some laughing, and often some concurrence that they'd never date a man shorter than them.
Because most of the adults know that there is a window when you can get rich off a known con and get out before it blows up with quite a lot of cash.

The best part of these being unqualified children is that they don't even realize that part of the deal they've signed up for is to take the fall when shit finally hits the fan.

There's plenty of people who have made money from SBF behind the scenes, but you'll never hear their names.
IHP seems great, but I found it very hard to work with.

The guide said it takes 15 minutes to build initially...it took my laptop 1 1/2 hours. And I didn't use cachix (no idea what it was, didn't want it to mess with my system) so after a nix-gc I had to build again...

And the pro version costs $300/year, and goes up to $1500/year if you make $20k. That might be good for a huge company, but if that's a side project or a solo dev's income, that's way too expensive.
The madness of the US healthcare aside, CAR-T is really a somewhat complicated therapy. There are no economies of scale there, unlike in pills. Each patient requires a lot of painstaking work that can only be done on specialized machines by highly qualified people, plus the safety requirements are really high.

Activating the immune system is risky. It is strong and it can crush cancer in mere weeks, but it is also very dangerous to friend and foe alike. Basically, you gather a lot of absolutely ruthless and stupid troops and tell them "here is ze Flammenwerfer, burn the enemy to crisp, but don't destroy anything else".

Easier said than done.
> It is surprising and discouraging that a forum that is meant to be about start-ups, disruption, innovation and new ideas is so blind to one so revolutionary as cryptocurrencies.

This is what happens when you put beliefs above facts. Just because you believe something doesn't make it true. If you ask a bunch of domain experts to review something, and they say it is bogus, then you are the one acting in bad faith, not them.

Don't blame them for giving you the answer you didn't want.

Instead, go be that crazy visionary and prove them all wrong. That's how science works.
>every other undo

Ahhhhh, some time you should try a little app called Adobe Photoshop.
He will have worked with some accountants and lawyers to move money into untouchable places. There will be someone employed to hold it for him, and dole it out in the future. Sure he will have to keep a low profile, but there will be resources.

He will probably have dispersed quite some sums to friends and family, some of that will come back to him in one way or another.

Finally, he will be able to go on the celebrity speaking circuit for quite a while...
>In both cases, the rest of the world should retaliate by limiting access to advanced technology until laws change.

That part is ok,but the problem isn't the GDPR but the CloudAct.

The US made it impossible to use any service of an US company by demanding access to all their data no matter where it's stored.

Imagine the US government could enter any house just because the lock is manufacturered by an US company.

And the US has a proven history of using wiretap data for economic benefits. See Echolon and Airbus vs Boing
This is getting ridiculous. The EU is waging a protectionist war on US tech companies.

The US should ban all EU produced cars from the US until the EU figures out a solution.
In the 19th century, for sure!
> In maven, don't you need to update the pom file of the projects to point to the local copy?

Yes and no. It depends. You can use modules. With modules, each sub project lives in a directory under the root project. Maven reactor figures out the build order and all that crazy stuff. It’s the same with sbt and gradle.
Yeah, a lot of (paid) themes for Wordpress and similar "DIY" CMSes are in violation by default, often without a way to change anything without editing the theme's code. On the other hand, using X different CDNs will increase load times for most sites and has no caching benefits anyway (browsers segregate caches by requesting origin to avoid the cross-origin signal that not doing so would provide). It's probably quite difficult to perform better than subsetting your fonts yourself and just shipping them as a single zopfli'd CSS file from your static domain.
Well, how about Kubernetes?
I fail to see your misunderstanding of what I stated. Rebasing is all about a pretty git-log, a pretty git-log is all about looking up why/what something changed. Everything I stated is about why you don't need a pretty git-log to know why/what something changed... Hope you don't talk to people at your day job like that.

Squashing commits of a feature branch via rebase is not the same thing as rebasing a local feature branch with the intended remote target.

Anyways, squashing is almost worse. Imagine doing a git blame on a line only to see a large commit of x amount of other changes with a summary about the global feature instead of an individualized commit referencing the line changed more closely. I am interested in those myriad of useless intermediate commits as you put it.
"As long as we pointlessly rename a bunch of stuff, we can create as much work for ourselves as we like, as well as for those who consume our APIs."

Whee! This is a fun article.
>Personally I think the confidence threshold for making a public accusation against an individual should be substantially higher than the confidence threshold for passing along private warnings.

Somebody presumably experienced the alleged behaviour first hand. They could make the accusation.

I made reference to Jimmy saville in my first post. He got away with paedophilia for decades because no one would publicly call him out on it.

Further it's unfair to the accused. If you make a public accusation, they can at least respond to it. There could be innocent people who have no idea what is being said about them behind their back.

I don't think morally there's a higher confidence threshold. If you think someone did something, enough to spread the rumour, then everybody should know, if you aren't that confident, perhaps you shouldn't be spreading the rumour at all. I suppose legally it makes you less exposed to libel, but an MP on the floor isn't exposed to such risks.

The point of my metaphor was that you need to trust judges. If 10% of unnamed judges are bent, then you can reasonably question any decision of the judiciary. The judges need to be named and investigated. And in the meantime you can at least have some faith in the remaining 90%.

What am I to think of my MP now? Should I recommend people contact him? Should I contact him, not knowing whether he's on the list or not? How should I interpret him not doing anything, like seemingly all the other MPs? How many of these Mps sit on select committees dealing with abuse etc? How many of these MPs are drafting laws on abuse? If one of those laws gets watered down, is that because there's a good reason or because it was drafted by a rapist?

Ultimately I don't think public naming and shaming in the first instance is optimal, but if there is a list, then there is a severe failure somewhere, and existing processes aren't fit for purpose. If MPs actually want to sort this out amongst themselves in the investigation phase, that, I think would be best. In the absence of that, publicly announcing the names is the best option.
IKEA is notorious for having one of the most opaque company structures in the world.

Word on the street is that ikea is technically a charity.
For example, the calculation above shows globally removing our current rate of CO2 production using one of the more expensive technologies behind this service would still be only about half as expensive as WWII was for the USA in terms of fraction of GDP. Expensive, sure, but clearly not impossible. If we were really "at war" with the climate change problem, it would be still cheaper than an actual war.
Ah, the magic of loaned funds with little or no demands tied to it. And you wonder why real estate prices are so high? It's largely the same principle, except the regulation is way, wayyy tighter. But in sum, the effect it has on markets is unquestionable.
Most countries do not have a history of Jim Crow laws and voter suppression like the U.S. does.
I am new player
More historical photos that include some shots of the underwater remains of the wreck:

https://www.mlive.com/news/2021/11/wreck-of-the-edmund-fitzg...
A soul is just a word for an individual human consciousness.
It's an amazing movie and for a good reason. It explains the complexities involved in the 2008 market crash using simple and humorous analogies making the problem comprehensible.
https://www.destatis.de/EN/Press/2022/09/PE22_374_43312.html It's better? You do not see much data because no EU country want to advertise much their sorry state of energy.
> They basically operate as secret agents for the insurance companies in order to gather information to permanently remove your health care (not just mental health care, but it crosses over into traditional medicine).

I live in a country where I don't have to care about that so none of your conspiracy really applies to me :)
That's hilarious. The reality is that just by not recommending C (or C++), they really are making things safer.
The previous dips though haven't been this leveraged though. Over the past couple years the amount of opaque and highly leveraged instruments against crypto has ballooned. There's a lot more on the line this time around imo.
Fixed my typo:

https://mappa.mundi.net/maps/maps_007/
My experience was that boisterous shenanigans, like juggling testicles or something, would absolutely not have been tolerated. Indeed, the mood was somber/business-like enough that no one even dared. On the other hand, a whispered inoffensive remark to your lab partner would be okay. Something this like this would probably be okay:

-- "Be careful not to nick the nerve as you <whatever>"

-- "Opps! Better now?

-- "Yes. In fairness, it's not her biggest problem right now"
most of crypto/segments of wallstreet are a giant scam using mathematics to make money, any pr is good for them. It is like that wall street movie quote "You got ninety percent of the American public out there with little or no net worth. I create nothing. I own. We make the rules, pal."
It sounds like your app turns photos into a watercolor style image? You can definitely do this faster with Stable Diffusion (~6s per image before optimization).

Here's how I would approach it: train a dreambooth model on watercolor style images, then run image-to-image using that model.

For examples of what dreambooth models can do see: https://synapticpaint.com/dreambooth/info/ (sample images here generated using a "modern disney" style model).

If you need help getting this set up feel free to email me! This stuff is probably not harder than getting gimp to run in a container.
Commments like this are precisely why the "rivalry" continues to exist.

GrapheneOS handily beats out every other project on security and technical merit -- let the code and project speak for itself, because jumping in to every single convo between end users you can find, doesn't help quell any of it.

From a GrapheneOS user for many years who thanks you for your work and dedication
Geniuinely curious - is it the easy solution if it aligns with Musk's vision? I mean. "keeping twitter on the rails" and "reshaping twitter in musk's vision" may not be two things that overlap. Where does he go from here if he wants to equalize twitter and reduce bots based on paid verification. Maybe keep verification/blue checks for brands and politicians and remove blue checks from journalists/influencers? I think the old money liberal journalists are the the group he gripes with the most.
> Now I use it

The qualification to work there and use an Arduino is to have no prior experience with it.
I think the best strategy to make it intuitive would be to flatten the redo stack as a single command, so that the pile of successive 'undo's gets redone as a single step. In your example:

Type "hello"
Type "world"
Type "!"
Undo
Undo
(Editor is "hello", with "world!" on the redo stack)

Type "dave"
(Editor is "hellodave")
(This would normally wipe the redo stack but instead it moves it to the undo stack)

Undo
(Editor is "hello")
Undo
(Editor is "helloworld!")
Undo
(Editor is "helloworld")
Undo
(Editor is "hello")
I'm one of customers that have money on FTX international which I cannot withdraw. (yup i know. bad decisions etc, but i knew the risk).

Do you guys know, what will happen with the funds?
Will I as a customer get any of my money back? (do you know if I'm a secured creditor?)
Given that places like Egypt, India, Mesoamerica, etc were all colonized by Europe despite long histories of advanced civilizations, I don't see how European colonization would imply a place isn't capable of technological advancement.
That NPR article is from 2012 and as far I can tell they referenced a survey from 2006.

"A SURVEY OF AMERICANS ’ POSSESSION OF DOCUMENTARY
PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP AND PHOTO IDENTIFICATION"
https://www.brennancenter.org/media/6697/download

In 2012 the same group said the number was only 500k. Also they mention "Legal precedent requires these states to provide free photo ID to eligible voters who do not have one." in the newer article.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/chal...

So in 6 years it went from over 3 million to half a million people without some form of ID that is valid for voting. Looking at it from a larger picture, that's approximately 0.217% of the entire US voting age population a decade ago that didn't have some form of legal ID that was valid for voting. That is a smaller percentage of people than were incarcerated in the entire US in 2012. What I am not able to determine is how people of that half million actually wanted to vote but were not able to for some reason? That missing number is the one I would care about putting the time and effort into making sure they had the opportunity to vote.

You can look at the yearly voter turnout in the US to easily see that a significant portion of the US simply didn't vote. And the freedom to choose to not vote is something I strongly support.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout_in_United_States...
The best advice I've heard is if you can get better interest rates with savings/investments then put your money there, if the interest on your debts are higher then pay them off with your spare money.

When paying off your debts you want to pay off the debt with the highest interest rate first (after you've met all your minimum payments of course).

Things to be wary of with paying off your mortgage is that some times there are penalty clauses in your contract so if you pay off too much you have to pay an additional fee (more common for the fixed period of fixed rate mortgages, but always check before overpaying your mortgage).
Do you have a chart for our entertainment?

(Does the IKEA org chart have the little figures from the assembly instructions, and an Allen key?)
Venezuela might be a good pick?

Or just disappear in Europe?
I've seen this movie, I don't want that life
RIP Terry. You're a king among kings.
Why so? I'm not selling or in any way distributing the patented machine, which is what really matters legally.

Or are you arguing in an ethical sense?
Some banks care about collecting deposits because the interest they earn on short term paper is more than the interest they pay on deposits. Some banks don't accept deposits at all -- these are called investment banks.

Also, banks don't really do a lot of maturity transformation -- there are so many myths about how banks operate -- if you look at a bank's balance sheet, you will see a range of short, medium, and long term debt that is constructed to roughly match their short, medium, and long term assets.

Rather, banks make money off of spreads, because banks have lower funding costs than their customers, due to a web of in house expertise, government guarantees, access to special lending facilities and payment networks that others can't access.

If you want to really understand banks, you should stop talking about deposits, which aren't particularly important, and instead focus on mortgages, which dominate the entire financial industry. If you want to buy a house, you could try to sell a bond into the bond market. But a household will have a hard time selling a bond. So they go to a bank, which performs its own credit analysis and then gives you a loan while they sell a bond. The interest you pay to the bank is more than the interest the bank pays on the bond. Banks make money off of this spread, which is small, but it is leveraged, so the total return on capital for the bank is high.

If you don't like it, you are welcome to try to fund your house purchase by selling your own bonds for a lower rate than what the bank charges you. Try crowdfunding your house purchase and skip the bank! Doing that will be an educational exercise that will clarify how banks make money -- it has nothing to do with funny business about deposits, and everything to do with banks having access to capital markets that the Smith household does not.

Most banks basically just break even on the deposits, given the costs of owning all those branches, paying the tellers, etc. Even if they make a profit, it's a small profit, but it's a great way to upsell other financial services (mortgages, auto loans, lines of credit) that make money for the bank, as well as charging fees, etc.

But they don't need your deposit in order lend someone else money, because they borrow from the capital markets at one rate, and lend at a higher rate, and this has nothing to do with borrowing short term and lending long term. Rather, the primary risk for banks comes from leverage.
> The mythical "they murdered A GAZILLION PEOPLE". Yeah, totally made up numbers made by anti-soviet historians that inflated numbers and considered natural causes as "murder".

Tankie with his "made up numbers" again. What next are you going to say? Holocaust is made up to mud the name of the glorious Reich that lifted Germany out of poverty?
https://www.ntsb.gov/news/press-releases/Pages/NR20210113.as...

Risks to Emergency Responders from High-Voltage, Lithium-Ion Battery Fires Addressed in Safety Report

Actions sought by the NTSB in the four safety recommendations issued Wednesday include:

Factoring the availability of a manufacturer’s emergency response guide, and its adherence to International Organization for Standardization standard 17840 and SAE International recommended practice J2990, when determining a U.S. New Car Assessment Program score.
Continued research on ways to mitigate or deenergize stranded energy in high-voltage lithium-ion batteries.
Continued research on ways to reduce the hazards associated with thermal runaway resulting from high-speed, high-severity crashes.
Manufacturer emergency response guides modeled on ISO standard 17840 and SAE International recommended practice J2990.
Incorporation of vehicle-specific information in emergency response guides for:
Fighting high-voltage lithium-ion battery fires.
Mitigating thermal runaway and the risk of high-voltage lithium-ion battery reignition.
Mitigating risks associated with stranded energy in high-voltage lithium-ion batteries during emergency response and before a damaged electric vehicle is removed from the scene.
Safely storing an electric vehicle with a damaged high-voltage lithium-ion battery.
Providing information and available guidance to first responders and other crash scene workers about fire risks associated with high-voltage lithium-ion battery fires in electric vehicles.
Fires in electric vehicles powered by high-voltage lithium-ion batteries pose the risk of electric shock to emergency responders from exposure to the high-voltage components of a damaged lithium-ion battery. A further risk is that damaged cells in the battery can experience thermal runaway – uncontrolled increases in temperature and pressure – which can lead to battery reignition. The risks of electric shock and battery reignition/fire arise from the “stranded” energy that remains in a damaged battery.