skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No, a suppository
Informasi RTP lengkap di link www.tirta4d.info
Sure, that's fair. But my view is that humans are still primitive when it comes to technology. Consider that we are able to harness but a tiny fraction of a tiny fraction of a tiny fraction of the energies in our sun. Our understanding of the universe is still quite limited, even as we learn more and expand our knowledge -- and find applications for that knowledge -- as time goes on.

Assuming we as a species survive long enough, some time in the future we may consider reality simulation to be a fairly simple thing that we don't give much thought. Just like we take a lot of technology for granted today that people even a few hundred years ago would think is magic.

In the past couple decades we've gone from computers mostly being heavy boxes that sit under desks, to hand-held things we keep in our pockets. And a bunch of decades before that, computers were massive pieces of technology that required large rooms to contain them. My mother, who passed away in 2001, would be astonished to the point of disbelief to learn that, just ten years later, I had what she would consider Star Trek technology in my pocket.

And that's a decade or two. We likely can't even imagine today what humanity's relationship with technology will be 200 or even 100 years from now. Being able to simulate a universe at some point seems well within the realm of possibility, at least to me.

And remember, we don't need to simulate an entire universe. Sure, we see light from billions of light-years away. But the fidelity of things that far out -- hell, the fidelity of things not even all that far from Earth -- need not be simulated with any fine detail at all, in order to fool people such as ourselves.
WG14 could take care about improving the language gotchas for safer software, something that all other ISO language groups, including WG21 do bother to do.

However in 40 years they already made their point not to care beyond make C a portable macro assembler with more UB issues than writing in raw Assembly.
https://archive.ph/lthwZ
This looks handy, better ergonomics than strace to just hook into http requests of a running process.

I wonder how it works with TLS if it’s working at the socket level..
> medium sized company for a backend dev position

> trying to find a customer to place me

It sounds fishy; you may have actually interviewed with some recruiting or contracting firm, not with the actual company with the backend dev position, that being their client.

That client bailed on them for whatever reason and so the job vaporized; then they scrambled to find another one (which they need to make money off you).
I lost tons of work when playing with toy assembly language programs in DOS, when I would save and compile and run it and it did something to crash necessitating a reboot, faster than SmartDrive would write the cache to disk. Particularly for anything crash-prone like messing with hooking interrupt vectors.
Bank deposits, of course, are >100% backed (by a mix of assets), the 10% reserve ratio is just specifying a minimum amount of one kind of asset (central bank reserves). Most countries don’t have the same kind of explicit reserve requirement and most have plenty stable banking systems.
It would certainly be a shock to some but most kids have no idea where they came from until they learn about the reproductive system. Their first instinct is that a bird dropped them out of the sky. So closing the gap between X and Y wouldnt be too crazy.

Now the social pressures of being a “machine baby” vs “natural womb baby” would be a different thing.
> ... Symbolics were even worse - you were always in the development environment and couldn't get anything out except a saved state dump

Symbolics had a delivery Lisp on DOS/Windows called CLOE.

On a Lisp Machine one also was not always in the full development environment. But Lisp was the operating system and thus Lisp plus some dev tools was always there. But when one wanted to use the development environment to its full capability one would need to load more stuff and create worlds with more debug information.

The delivery of Lisp applications wasn't a thing until after the mid 80s. Before that there were not that many Lisp applications and not too much machines to install it on. This changed with UNIX workstations, 386/486 PCs, Macs with 68030/40. Even in the early 90s there were questions how to deliver Lisp software in static form to end users. The question was often answered with "rewrite it in C++". Sometimes: prototype it in Lisp and then rewrite it in C++. Sometimes: migrate to C++. Sometimes: use a Lisp compiler generating C code.

For some discussion of delivery problems in Lisp see the German Apply project from 1992:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229022605_APPLY_A_m...
> What's not clear to me is what they gambled on that lost money.

My guess would be other crypto ventures. All these crypto companies pumped each other with no products/assets (Stadium names and soccer team sponsorships with no products to sell!) and invested in each other. The economy had so much excess money and they got pumped and they thought this is what "investing" is. Economy's bubble burst and suddenly their valuations goes to 0.

When economy goes bad everyone is hurt but these companies had nothing but vaporware and are vaporizing as a result.

Just a guess though.
I worked for a fund that lost a lot of money once. It was all legit, nothing shady, just dumb investments gone wrong.

We phoned one of these well known investors to tell them what had happened. By that of course I mean the person in charge of the little piece of the massive fund that was allocated to us.

On the call the guy goes "when I tell my boss in 5 minutes, I'm going to get fired for investing in you". He wasn't wrong.

The thing that shocks me is the due diligence. There's a heck of a lot of things you have to do to get Ontario to invest in your fund. All sorts of documents, double signature statements from banks, meetings where you wear a suit. We'd have lost the investments if we were playing video games, there's no doubt about that. Maybe culture changed but it seems really odd, because part of due diligence is qualitative: does this team seem like serious people?
Moved from Plex to Jellyfin about a month ago. While it obviously isn't as polished as Plex (yet), it has come a long way in the last few years. I remember trying it about 2 years ago and the experience wasn't nearly as good.

Biggest problem for me was recognizing anime, Plex usually does a good job with it but Jellyfin doesn't. My solution is just to rename (or rather, create hardlinks with proper file names and structure) with Sonarr.

Second biggest problem has been the Android TV client. I find it clunky and the built-in video player doesn't support HDR. You can use external player (like VLC) or set up Kodi with Jellyfin add-on which I've done, but it's still not as smooth experience as with Plex.

Overall I find it better than Plex, with active community pushing new updates constantly.
rosemary can handle pretty low rainfall, you can probably keep the surface of the soil pretty dry if you water it very intermittently

things like aloe and spekboom even less rainfall

then you could work nights

but this is starting to sound less like an office and more like the stuff i was writing about 9 years ago in https://dercuano.github.io/notes/underground-arcology.html
They don’t do it on industrial scale.
I guess it goes to show even in the face of all the scams there remains a massive appetite for [seemingly] legit markets to buy/sell coins. Boggles my mind these idiots can't simply be satisfied to run a profitable, lawful operation.
This is the analysis of one specific implementation of calloc() in one specific operating system, nothing can be extrapolated from that.
Unless you think people hate Musk because of the look on his face, I don't know how can the two of them be separated.

Disregarding whether you approve or reject Elon Musks opinions, it's absurd to think that Elon's takeover and pretty vocal announcement of change twitter to his vision wouldn't affect the brand and reputation. You can debate whether the changes should be of concern to advertisers (to which my opinion is that they obviously are), but it's undeniable that the brand has changed.
No clue what electrical in the Netherlands is supposed to look like but it sounds like it's a floating ground if you're sure you're feeling the same effect. Grab a voltmeter and check and if you're seeing 60-70V AC then it's probably EMI filtering. It's completely safe and doesn't present any kind of shock risk other than the fact that it's an indication that the chassis is ungrounded which means you don't have the added safety of shorting out the circuit if a live wire came loose inside and energized the chassis.

Personally I miss the days when protective earth was protective earth and you didn't have to worry about engineers doing foolish things like using it for EMI filtering or any sort of current path, even if miniscule. The safest class Y capacitor is the one that doesn't exist.
Maybe that first value is a bunch of zeroes?

Since you mention Rust, here's a neat piece of trivia: `vec![0; N]` compiles down to a `calloc` call. (Well Rust's own version of `calloc`.)
Lol nonsense
How do you tell that people are trustworthy in the first place?
> [I] want to see a punishment that would deter future corporate executives from thinking about doing anything remotely similar in the future.

Unfortunately for that to happen, we would need some proof that punishment acts as a deterrent.
I only read it as an adult and was also struck by its sadness. I appreciate how it touches on fundamental themes - sacrifice, love, growing up, dying, all in one short story. For me it is also the feeling of nostalgia, having a toy like the rabbit when I was little. It’s probably what helps many people connect with the story, having a favorite toy and then “abandoning” it growing up.
I'm curious what the legal position on copyright is with ML assisted works.

Up until now the tools being used aren't usually defining the end product. I don't mean library code or song samples, etc. where licensing comes into play. The tools I'm referring to, like an IDE, or art program, or even a paintbrush, might enhance the process of creation but they don't define the product.

With ML the output of the tool becomes a concrete part of the end product. So, surely the copyright ownership for the part of the product generated via ML is not held by the person using the tool. Which means you would have to license the ML generated part of your product from whoever produced the tool.

I have no legal expertise but it definitely feels like there is a dangerous trap in using these tools without that question being answered.
Building a Cabin in Svalbard
The Marble (Music) Machine: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvUU8joBb1Q
I wonder if "comes out occasionally" means "leaves and comes back" to the airport. Wouldn't that break the "streak"?
> I now always choose open source over closed source but free as in beer.

> They start out great but as financial constraints creep in

Funny how you talk about financial constraints, and still refuse to pay for software.
Show HN: Eleven – Free, open-source, Codespaces alternative with automatic HTTPS
Hey HN,
Eleven is the second project that I've built to learn Go. It lets you create code sandboxes, in your cloud provider account, easily.

What's a "code sandbox"? Just a VM, running in your cloud provider account, with some runtimes pre-installed, your repositories cloned, a way to connect to it with your preferred editor (or via SSH) and a way to serve your apps easily via HTTP (with automatic HTTPS).

You could use it as a remote development environment, to test some code or even to deploy your app. It's up to you.

For example, to deploy a Node.JS app:

$ eleven aws init hello-world --runtimes node@18.7.0 --repositories eleven-sh/hello-world

> Success! The sandbox "hello-world" was initialized.

$ ssh eleven/hello-world forever node index.js

> Forever: command started. Run "forever stop" in current path to stop.

$ eleven aws serve hello-world 8000 --as hello.eleven.sh

> Success! The port "8000" is now reachable at: https://hello.eleven.sh

$ curl https://hello.eleven.sh

> Hello World

Still learning Go by the way, so I'm open to any suggestions to improve.
Was there a specification back when this was written? Did it specify what it does now?
Zeal OS is a modernized fork of the Temple Operating System
The commercial versions for Windows and Mac were not all "insanely expensive". Apple's MCL was sold for under $1000. Later the price was reduced even further. That's expensive, but far from a commercial UNIX workstation Lisp, which would be $4000 or more. On the PC there were also mid-priced offerings like Allegro CL, Golden Common Lisp, ...

Still memory and early PCs were expensive. Like a good Compaq system or an Apple Mac IIfx / Quadra. A dev seat could easily cost $10k or much more with RAM, Disk, large screen.
There's if they're willing to invest 60 mil for the movie...
Today's media "journalists" follow whatever gets cameras and eyes on them.
I am not sure if you're serious or not, but smaller countries often only publish decisions on paper and social media - they often don't have a functioning website. However, in this specific case, the Commission do have a functioning website, and it is indeed posted there: https://www.scb.gov.bs/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Securities...
HN, educate me on this please, why is this wrong or upsetting?

You don't get paid for the work you do, you get paid for how hard it is to replace you, right? Is this not supposed to be the case or is it illegal or immoral (by someone's standards?)?

You have Bob and Jane both C programmers with equal education and experience but Jane's work is many times superior to Bob, so getting someone of the same caliber as Jane will cost more because they can negotiate for more right?

Also, do the same people who get outrages about this also insist that salary negotiation should be a thing of the past? That means a position will pay a fixed amount no matter who is filling it? Meaning the larger a team the more it costs so get what few people you have to work harde and longer right because they all cost the price of the highest performer?

I am not trying to make a point I just want to know what the ideal situation is supposed to be.

I don't have much gripe about pay, I would be happy to get paid the same amount as people with kids and mortgages who can't take any less than a high amount but I certainly don't want to hear other people's salary or tell mine. But it would suck if all the few high paying roles are always taken because of the demand and the majority are much lower paying.
> Some friction in decision making will often yield better decisions.

I agree. The problem starts when this sort of friction continues after all the decision-making is done and starts manifesting as contrarian positions towards how the project is being conducted, always insisting that their idea was better, and even assuming aspects of sabotage.

It's one thing to determine a path forward, but an entirely different thing to assume a "my way or no way" stance.
I've been waiting for a downturn since I missed the one in 08 and it seems to never come.

I've resigned to the fact that I'll probably never own property and eventually move into a camper van.
I just said risk; depends on your definition of counterparty risk I suppose, but it’s a much greater risk than those you discuss if you’re attempting to store value in cryptocurrencies.

Stated another way: if you can’t find a counterparty, does the risk you’re talking about matter?
Do you break your ‘streak’ of living in your house when you leave to go to work?
Art is not the same bracket as machine work. Art is a cultural expression and experience. It’s not about who churns out 3000 paintings the fastest, otherwise some speed painters would have won.

I can highly recommend the book “But is it art?” By Cynthia Freeland to get a better perspective on this topic!
Yes. One of the scariest stories that I have read.
He's also being purposefully obtuse about his 2 largest regrets - the "poorly labeled" account and underestimating the size of the withdrawals.

He's still behaving as if having billions of liabilities in real money backed by funny money "assets" is somehow acceptable and everything would have been fine if it wasn't for the "last week".
Agreed. As an immigrant from Hong Kong to UK, I see many people coming to work for minimum wage. Most of them are quite wealthy and just work to feel like being a part of society.
That's the perfect comment right in the middle that both sides can agree thinking it's actually about the other half.
Especially if they got conned? There were plenty of trustworthy people trusting sbf.
I don't know a single knowledgable IT person who is into cryptocurrencies (and all of them were curious in the beginning).

This might also be why people like them and me just ignore most discussion about cryptocurrencies. It is not my job to convince idiots that what they are doing is stupid and they lie to themselves because they already invested a lot of time and money into this.

But that also means in any cryptocurrency-discussion you will always hear those invested people and rarely people like you and me. This distorts the picture of course.
It tells about the factorizations if anything, as that's the input dimensions they are using. If you haven't seen factorization diagrams, it's worth checking them out first: https://mathlesstraveled.com/factorization/

But visualisations can always deceive you into seeing something that's not there, e.g. correlation vs causation.
> "Get Out" vibes for sure.

At that point it was too late.

If a significant number of customers tried to withdraw a few days earlier, FTX would have collapsed a few days earlier.

The mistake was made when giving FTX the money.
While Twitter would have him, Trump would spend hours tweeting (and watching TV), when he wasn't playing golf. Musk and Kanye, probably less.
A dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest. It’s the honest ones you should watch out for
The exact same thing could be said about the US, even worse.
Ask HN: Is American culture intentionally or organically pushed abroad?
In Australia, I've noticed a sharp uptick in "Americanisation" in the past few years. From politics to possessions.

I'm wondering if this is just natural, or if there is some kind of push to make Australia in particular more American?
How is this different from a WYSIWYG HTML editor?
Easy for you to say but how many human lives have been improved over the last 70 years do to economic growth which is highly dependent on fossil fuels?

Billions?

Many people wouldn’t mind being frozen in 1950’s USA (except those with cancer), but probably not 1950’s China or India.
Well one could say USD is at least backed by a real economy and a massive military.

Moreover the Fed does not claim that the U.S. Dollar is still backed by gold.

Tether is not a stablecoin if it is not backed by USD and if this is the case, then it has no value as a bridge between fiat currencies and crypto.

People paid with real money to buy crypto which was heavily inflated by this USDT out of nothing scheme. Because it was real money it also was real fraud in my opinion.
I’m guessing it doesn’t work with TLS as it’d need the keys to decrypt the traffic
And not just tech. In the article I tried to compare it to gardening.

But my initial idea was to compare it two political issues recently in my country. That story was far too unrecognizable though.

The issues are, where a decentralized police, that was governed by local mayors, was replaced by a central police force, governed by national government. Centralization that was sold as being much cheaper and more efficient. The cheaper was a lie, but only because the conversion itself turned out far more difficult. The more efficient is true. But only for a certain part of efficient.

Previously, e.g. mayors could micro target issues that were directly plagueing a small neighborhood. Now, this is still possible, but has to move through layers of bureaucracy first. In many parts, i'm told, it's less efficient. Overall, the sum, however obviously operates more efficient. Instead of each of the thousands of municipalities having some HR, there now is only one. Same for IT, etc etc.

The other issue is exactly reversed: mental service for Youth (youth care) a rather large institute, was decentralized: moved to municipalities. The promise was that this would allow far better detailed care. It is a fiasco, because the national government never considered that it would be far more expensive. They even promised it would cut costs.

Why voters fall for this, and think that both promise can be true (decentralized being more expensive and saving money) is beyond me. But the effect of decentralization on effincy is clearly visible here too.
Sequoia's Man of the Year
I worked on projects where rebase was the norm, even for public feature branches.

Not a problem.

Rebase is a tradeoff of handling merge conflicts with achieving a commit history that is far cleaner and audit-friendly.

The point being that some technical choices are not black and white, and people mistake baseless personal opinions with technical truths. There's an awful lot of workable grey areas with tradeoffs.

If a team member insists on pushing his personal opinions as the truth, challenges and opposes each and every proposal that does not match his personal opinion, and drags on personal vendettas in decisions that didn't went their way... I'd say that no matter where their tech skills are, that person is still incompetent and a liability in any team.
I feel the need to respond here, but I really don't want to. Anyway...

The core of Agile is that it values:

- Individuals and interactions over processes and tools

- Working software over comprehensive documentation

- Customer collaboration over contract negotiation

- Responding to change over following a plan

Agile also has 12 development principles:

1. Customer satisfaction by early and continuous delivery of valuable software.

2. Welcome changing requirements, even in late development.

3. Deliver working software frequently (weeks rather than months).

4. Close, daily cooperation between business people and developers.

5. Projects are built around motivated individuals, who should be trusted.

6. Face-to-face conversation is the best form of communication (co-location).

7. Working software is the primary measure of progress.

8. Sustainable development, able to maintain a constant pace.

9. Continuous attention to technical excellence and good design.

10. Simplicity—the art of maximizing the amount of work not done—is essential.

11. Best architectures, requirements, and designs emerge from self-organizing teams.

12. Regularly, the team reflects on how to become more effective, and adjusts accordingly.

So now please check if your company is doing this or not.

If you say "We're following most of that, and it really sucks", then we can have a valuable discussion.

But if you say "We're not following that and it really sucks", well then why are you arguing that Agile doesn't work?
Well, obviously. They were the elite.
Tell HN: Siri provides Apple Music link when sharing current song on Spotify
My phone screen is broken, so I use Siri a lot lately. I was listening to a song on Spotify, and asked Siri to "Send this song to Alice". Everything seemed to go fine until later, I saw the link was Apple Music, not Spotify.

Alice likely never listened to it because we only ever share Spotify links.

Also what is happening behind the scenes to give Apple the song from Spotify? Are they just accessing current song on Spotify? What if they don't have it on Apple Music? Or are they running pattern recognition on the audio output to determine song?
And by goodness, I almost stopped reading, because what a whiny rant.