skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Right - I get that, and you make a fair (and valid!) point. Nobody knows where the top is. It's all hypothetical.

But my point is that when you're seeing hypergrowth in your company, you probably have an idea of what it's worth or what level you're happy walking away at. Example: I currently run a small side-hustle culinary business while I look for a full-time tech gig. It doesn't make me much money but I enjoy doing it and it helps put food on the table. If someone came up and offered me a million dollars to walk away, I'd take it without blinking.

If Yahoo offered Zuck 10 billion way back when instead of 1 billion, I have a feeling he would have walked away, too.
Gas exploration is way down. No gas production won't stop, but supply growth seems to be completely stalled while demand is not due to developing countries continuing to get richer. Gas will likely continue to be expensive as we transition away from fossil fuels.
>The first $10,000 USD value in your deposit wallets will earn 8% APY

(This is what FTX was offering customers)

And now we know the accounts weren't actually covered by real money (or "value" as they called it). So when person X was asking FTX for their money back, FTX would send person X+1's money to cover

Sounds like a Ponzi to me
> I try to address this by linking to a bunch of Postcard example sites on the homepage.

I think I've developed a sort of blindness to the social proof thing with <human head in a circle and positive text blurb> so it took me a bit to realize those are clickable examples of actual user websites and not just endorsements. Makes sense.

> but, that no big VC-backed startup will ever focus on because it's a small market.

A ton have come and gone like: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posterous (It even starts with a P, ha, time is a flat circle)

I believe it had custom domains at some point and a built in newsletter/rss and the thing that made it popular at the time was that you could email it your posts.

You should copy that feature. :)

Cool, and good luck.
It's running on my 13 Mini (so far).

I did have trouble closing the "adjustments" dialog (upper-right button) due to its close button being underneath the status bar, but found that I could just drag the dialog down to the bottom and it closed.
The same reason why paid television or streaming services eventually grow ads: it's hard to say no to extra money.
That’s both really intriguing, and horrifying!

It’s already _technically_ impossible to erase something from the internet, but if they removed the barrier to knowing where something was before in order to find it in the archive, it would be truly impossible in every sense of the word.
I like the old logo more. It looks less commercial, more old-fashioned, and less sleek, which I think is a good thing for a museum.
My wife is a corporate librarian for one of the older tech companies. You are correct.
> Because they thought that would be more similar to e.g. MIT

Why would a superficial similarly to "MIT" be any be useful?

Any potential student should be able to look past that.
In what world does the federal taxpayer fund Twitter?
Kindly look into Yahoo's board and large investors at the time. Your answer should be apparent. This isn't about Patriotism, and I'm not sure I understand the scare quotes. It would be just as much about Patriotism as the Patriot Act
Forget innately low risk aversion, Sam has autistically low levels of risk aversion:

https://twitter.com/sammykoppelman/status/159047684524111462...
I'm aware of that, it just reminded me of that incident and I thought others would find it funny too is all.
If I were you I would not want exposure to any crypto at the moment - I'd exchange to cash and put it in a normal bank account as soon as possible.
Is it a 301 that keeps looping? I noticed my company's website does that when I try to cURL, and I wondered if it was cookie based, or how to get around it.

(EDIT: Yes, I figured it out. To get around the 301 loop. cURL needs to save cookies)
Asyncio is annoying, and often unexpectedly slow. You think things are parallel, but then one misbehaving coroutine can hog your cpu bringing everything to a halt. GIL makes it useless for anything other than _heavily_ IO bound tasks.

And yeah, Python's documentation is useless. Never how to use stuff, only listing of everything that's possible to do / the API. Unfortunately that style is being mimicked by most other Python projects as well.
To replace paid employees with customers working for free, I'd say?
Speaking as a white, working-class kid who got a good education, worked hard, had some amazing luck, and is now an affluent, heteronormative, relatively high-status parent:

What a load of horseshit.

Yes, my wife and I teach our kids about the value of hard work, even as we recognize that there was a big element of luck and privilege involved in our success. It takes nothing away from our self-esteems to say that, even though, yes, we worked hard and continue to work hard. But we had some lucky breaks. And to be frank, I've screwed up a lot in my life and my career, and I've always been given another chance. Nobody ever said about me, "well, what did you expect? He's just a white heterosexual christian male, after all."

So is it a contradiction that we acknowledge our privilege and our good fortune, while teaching our children to work hard? Of course it isn't. Life is far more complicated than that, which this author, in his quest for a simple either/or framework and a pithy line, seems to forget.

There is also literally no one in our social circle, or anyone that I know of in our larger social media set, who advocates "defund the police." I would like to see police de-emphasize military-style equipment and training. I would like to see police trained to treat members of the public as citizens, rather than as enemy combatants. I would like to see fewer of them armed. I would like to see police officers who kill held accountable. I would like to see police cultivate better relationships with people of color. Are these "luxury beliefs"? I don't think so, but my beliefs are far too nuanced to be caricatured as "defund the police." Once again, though, the author needs something short and snappy, so that's what he's going with.
but it’s counter-intuitive

what makes options trading fun? the allure of turning a profit

what does evidence show? not only will you not turn a profit options trading, you’ll realize losses

how is realizing losses fun when the goal
was supposed to be to turn profit?
They forgot to mention: "Politically" https://twitter.com/monitoringbias/status/158997602918724403...
This is it in a nutshell. Maybe when a criminal enterprise is more “white-collar” than the usual, the truth behind the concept of being “in too deep” is overlooked.
> He may have introduced an abortion ban but the bill never passed and Republicans in Congress never voted for it. The poster above you said Republicans banned abortion at the federal level which is 100% wrong.

Calling that bill an "abortion ban" is misleadingly overstating it. IIRC, it didn't ban all abortions, just those after 16 weeks (after the first trimester?).
I always thought tips was on top of minimum wage but sounds like it is more sponsoring/helping the employer to pay it's employees instead of an extra to the employee.
Human transcription accuracy is just two nines :)
Me too. According to the the way it's always explained to me it should
be impossible for airplanes to fly upside down sustainably because the force of
gravity and the lift should add to each other rather than cancelling,
yet they often seem to do that in air shows.
What makes it not a ponzi? Is the idea that "the possibility that number may go up" the only thing to distinguish it?
It's more like a current understanding of various takes of professionals on the "immunity debt" concept, especially in children:

* https://twitter.com/FurnessColin/status/1589103107048624129 (which has an additional interesting take about measles)
* https://twitter.com/lisa_iannattone/status/15762315127179919...
* https://twitter.com/unbiasedscipod/status/158891593499112652...
* https://counterdisinformationproject.substack.com/p/immunity...

which is not necessarily intuitive as well, but still, at this point, makes way more sense than the "immune system is a muscle" discourse.
I avoid self-checkouts because it almost always takes longer; something always goes wrong.

The ones I will never use are those which have a voice you can't turn off. Having to listen to those as I queue nearby, all I want for xmas is a HIMARS.
Tying one's personal identity to a private company that can be bought and sold always ends in heartache...
Why don't Google and Apple buy this product then proceed to analyze and close all holes?
The website used to call it a programming language, but I assume you think that when the website stopped calling it a programming language that it turned into just a compiler?

Regardless, this discussion is actually irrelevant. I later found out (and linked to here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33548314) that Circle isn't even regularly ""censored"" on /r/cpp.

Although, for the record, I would be ok if the mods removed all Circle-related posts on /r/cpp for the reasons I stated above, but no point in discussing that as it isn't even what's happening.

In reality, this was a single post with a misleading title, but Circle's author is apparently desperately looking for any opportunity to play the victim.
It seems to be this pending patent for "Container, closure, and methods for manufacture" which contains many diagrams of the design https://patents.google.com/patent/US20220204224A1/en

Fig. 4 especially points out the flow/direction of ketchup and air.
Is Twitter worth saving as our agora?
Do they get to take a victory lap around moon?
There is something that we do know though. Those who dont flip coin at all will never get close to 20 heads. Ever.
Maybe I’m in the wrong tax bracket but I’m fine walking away from anything once I have more than a billion dollars regardless of age.
Plain HTML would be great, its just browsers holding it back. Without CSS, it looks unacceptably ugly.
Not defending what DD was doing there but whether it directly goes to the driver/server/cashier or not, you're still implicitly giving that money to the store owner/delivery company/restaurant by allowing them to get away with poor pay.
Not COVID, because it is so highly infectious, but there is evidence that a strain of flu was eradicated because of COVID measures[1].

[1] https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/09/covid-may-have-pushe...
Some claim you can:
"The historical evidence indicates that when inflation is as high as it is today, and the unemployment rate is as low as it is today, the probability of a recession over the next one and two years is extraordinarily high"
source: https://www.hks.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/centers/mrcb...
If there's a true step change that happens once (and nothing else), inflation looks like:

0% 0% 0% +10% +10% +10% +10% +10% +10% +10% +10% +10% +10% +10% +10% 0% 0% 0%

If there's a .8% price increase per month, every month, it looks like:

+10% +10% +10% +10% +10% +10% +10% +10% +10% +10% +10% +10% +10% +10%

The upside of reporting this way:

* Seasonal effects are (mostly) removed

The downside:

* You have to have a lot of context about surrounding numbers to try and distinguish between these scenarios.

* The drop from +10% to 0% is not related proximally at all to the real change.

* Even if you are careful in interpretation, information and context are removed.

It's not very user friendly or useful as a single number to get an idea about what's happening with prices now.

> If we're honestly at the point where this is considered too confusing for the masses, I think I've stopped thinking democracy is a good idea.

I have a lot of knowledge about economics and mathematics, and it's frequently confusing for me and difficult to tease out what's really happening with prices from a couple of macroeconomic aggregates. If that makes you give up on democracy, uh, so be it.
The Rx model works nicely. Rather than trying to model state transitions, you model "scopes of work." So if you have something like an event listener, you would tie it to the active unlock session. When that session ends, you dispose of that "scope of work" and all work associated with it would immediately stop.
I can recommend to using helpful frameworks to save development time when building your SaaS production CRUD app.

There is an open source React based framework called "refine."

It eliminates the repetitive tasks demanded by CRUD operations and provides solutions for critical parts like authentication, access control, routing, networking, state management, and i18n.

So your developers can save a lot of time on the development process.
Here is the repo:
https://github.com/refinedev/refine
> "Hopefully they treated the original reporter(s) fairly as well."

Perhaps they should have reconsidered a bounty payment of some sort for the first bug reporter as well. Perhaps that's where the other $30k of the $100k went.

This actually says something interesting about bug bounty programs in general:

Given a high level of false positives, it's probably not uncommon AT ALL that sometimes it takes a couple of bug reports before something is reproducible or generates a high enough alert/credibility status, as seemed to have happened here.

What's the correct protocol to be fair to all of the original bug reporters in those situations? Split the bounty? Reward all of them with the full amount?
That's the beauty of outlining a methodology. You'll need to answer a few things but most importantly, how do you quantify risk when executing your strategy ie:selling calls?

It feels like you're going off vibes, which is fine, but what's irking people is that "basically" and "essentially" are weasel words that make it seem like you're trying to launder gambling as investing.

Maybe a better question to start with is, which measures of quantitative risk are you familiar with and how to they play into your strategy?
In the long run, we're all dead...
You do realise he could've just not done anything if that was the point? Why go through all the trouble if he could've just kept the company?

Some people will find problems with everything, what a depressing comment. I guess he also runs it as a B-Corp and wrote a book promoting the concept because he wants more power, there's no way he actually wants the employees to have more balanced lives and to put less impact on the planet, it's just a ploy to get more power.

You're the type of person that hears a friend donated money to charity and mutters to themselves that they just did it for attention and recognition.
AWS has a bug bounty it's just hosted by the fine black hat community instead of amazon
Agreed. Although not super normie friendly, you can make a decent one-pager with some rudimentary HTML knowledge and a few lines of CSS to make it pretty. Though I appreciate the creator's intention, encouraging people to have their own public website separate from closed social media networks like LinkedIn.
For UK users, the "Bright" product (see app stores) - which is also part-branded "Glow", almost like they want to set themselves up to fail - from Hildebrand allows for real-time access to smart-meter data (as in minute to minute, not delayed by 24 hours or even 30 minutes) via MQTT. It's essentially a modified consumer HID for smartmeters (the now ubiquitous little screens issued by energy companies to show consumption on an LCD display). It's cheaper, as well as more accurate, than the other devices mentioned here, albeit at the expense of providing a breakdown by circuit.
Oh, I was thinking of a mode that the _page source code_ would trigger somehow, instead of the client triggering on a page that was possibly written to be full of complex CSS and JS. But also, maybe? It does seem related to OP. I am just brainstorming, don't have anything particularly thought out.

I don't personally use any "reader mode" much.
Everyone says this, but it's not true for the newer filters which use electrostatic attraction to filter the smaller particles.

A dirty filter (do you know how many people don't ever change their filter?) will put far more load on a blower than a better filter.

A MERV11 is significantly less effective, and wouldn't affect dust production anyway since it is created mostly by your skin, clothing fibers, etc.

During the California wildfires I bought several air sensors and placed them around my house and experimented with different filters. a MERV16 with a carbon layer reduced VOCs, PM2.5, etc all down to extremely low levels in every room.
Even if this was a great, well-built tool, which I am sure it is...

Doesn't this introduce a whole dimension of extra stateful complexity compared to configuration YAML?
The point isn’t that the old logo was good, they include a similar AirBnb one on that list, the point is pure black is even less distinctive.

The new logo is objectively less distinctive as a shorter sentence can completely describe it.
It was even worse than that. I worked for Wells Fargo doing credit checks at the time. The entire system was set up to rubber stamp loans without looking too closely. That'd be a problem for whatever downstream sucker bought it. At the time I had a bit of a robin hood attitude about it: if it's not illegal and follows policy that these subprime folks historically discriminated against get a bigger loan so be it. Now I have a more complex view on it, and see it as much more brazenly predatory.
If Google upranked “documents” (simple HTML content without JavaScript), then there would be an incentive to publish simple content.

Instead Google goes to insane lengths to parse JavaScript generated abominations, and otherwise allow/encourage shitty content.
I love using vitepress, https://vitepress.vuejs.org/
Simplification of web development letting the main focus be on content and style.
29 times then
Website is totally borked for me on iPad Safari. Looks like the CSS isn’t loading.
In my European country all own brands are available in cans.
> Thanks for the link, but it is specifically comparing _education_ levels, which has been strongly leaning towards more women, for various factors: such as, men are more interested in trades (partly economic, but also instinctual) and STEM, and most "education" now has been diluted to appeal to women; there are more creative, feminine studies now than 50 years ago.

The study is illustrating the groups in which women broadly have more educational attainment than men, women are more likely to marry down. Including highlighting several subgroups where the majority of women are marrying down, and thus implying that the majority of men are marrying up.

Your arguments here try to diminish the meaningfulness of this metric. Which I think is dumb because it's clearly at least a good proxy measurement for women gaining some form of social power, but suppose you were correct and it's a meaningless metric. Then what's driving the high prevalence of women marrying down? Because they are. This is observed data. Women in these groups are marrying down. The idea that hypergamy is instinctive female behavior does not hold up to scrutiny against sociological studies.
Raytheon is another example.

I think the open book metaphor gets lost in the aggressive roundness of the O. When I first looked at it, I thought why would they make it look like a turbo fan…? Now in the case of Raytheon, a turbofan makes complete sense.

Hindered by this bias, it took me a bit to arrive at the open book representation, and was only able to do that because it’s OUP.

https://www.rtx.com/
A few months ago we switched from a small dark blue hatchback to a bigger silver grey SUV. At the time I didn't really think about the color. Then I had a conversation with our neighbour and he pointed out that silver grey is an excellent color for a daily driver - small scratches are practically invisible and so are the tacky chrome accents. So, yes, I know I'm driving the most boring looking car on the road but I do like the practicality of it.
Yes, people know him. He's a math-y guy (and seemed like a reasonably nice and genuine person). He wasn't just a Jane Street intern, he worked there for a few years full time before striking out on his own. Doesn't seem so hard to explain to me--smart dude with some experience in finance et viola.
You can't prove who did it, or even that it was done in the first place.
Some quotes from Dahl from the interview:

The discipline of writing:

"Your concentration is fairly intense. You're lost into this world of the story that you happen to be doing - it's terrifically demanding you know. What do I write four, four-and-a-half hours a day - so a quarter of my waking hours I am completely immersed in a dotty world of fantasy."

Writing for children vs adults:

"To my mind, there's no question that to write a children's book of comparable quality to a fine adult novel or story is more difficult - it's much more difficult to achieve the children's book."
I've reported some bugs to programs on Hackerone before that were flagged as dupe and the triager did reference the original report. Chrome team does this too.
The Royal Astronomical Society seems like a pretty good example of the opposite.

The old logo was, well old, very forgettable and not particularly well constructed in the first place.

The new logo presents the society as a modern scientific institution, and the logo itself is executed well. And the animation actually works, a rare example where logo animation is not gratuitous.
You're glossing over the fact that part 1 of your income equation is irrelevant if you can get the government on your side.
And now presumably all that stuff is totally gone?

30 years ago, the "folder" would have been an actual manilla folder, and you'd still have it sitting in a drawer at home somewhere.
I think it's interesting to see how big these clouds are in absolute terms because it gives us an idea of when the cloud has finished eating the world. We have global IT equipment energy consumption estimates, and we have scattered data points on cloud energy consumption. Looking at the two, you can gauge the overall process.

Also as an investor I like to have a general idea of Amazon vs. Google in terms of overall size, to combine with their revenue figures, because that helps me understand how much of Google is being sold as GCP and how much is being used by Google itself.
Saying that something is wrong doesn't imply (at least for me) that you're 100% sure that it's wrong.

This is wrong. Words have meanings.
Haven't heard of Dagger before, but using IaC as code to model your pipelines (including pipelines of infra that itself is modeled as IaC) is absolutely the right way to do things. And doing it in a real programming language rather than some limiting yaml schema is so much nicer. Places I've worked at in the past would refer to these as meta pipelines or self-mutating pipelines.

For this reason, I love using the AWS CDK. Being able to model things in TypeScript was so much nicer than the janky flow of always feeling lost in some Ruby/JSON/YAML IaC template monstrosity.

Curious how Dagger differentiates itself from AWS CDK or cdktf.
Why is cryptocurrency mysteriously unique in not being able to generate cash flow? I can use cryptocurrency as gold, as cash, as a savings account, or artwork, all of which very obviously generate returns.
tx for sharing love this quote:

What looks intentional to one observer may seem accidental to another. “A lot of animal-behavior analysts would look at the same sequence of behavior and give a different interpretation,”
"In a statement issued to Newsweek magazine, KFC Germany blamed the message on a bot."

Blaming a bot is always a cop-out. It should be blamed on whoever made the decision to deploy a bot in the first place.
>Two weeks after our call, I got a new message that confirmed the original info I had. They said that even though my report was a duplicate, it was only because of my report that they started working on the fix.

Google engineers don't seem to care much or am I being too harsh here ?