skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I’ll give the answer.

The shrinks only came about in 19-somethng?

You’ve seen the James Webb telescope pics right?

Forget for a second.

Humans lived quite awhile. Not since 1900

What shrink would you send to anyone in 72 AD?

We all lived a long ass time. No, I think not, I think the DSM can go away. I think not.

The history of the world is madness, and some idiots that major in some bullshit cannot label such a thing.

Up to us I guess.

Edit:

I want them to label Cesear first, and his populous next

Then Lincoln

Then the dead in the Civil War

Label them first

Then label me.
Chinese are criticizing zero-Covid, in language censors don’t seem to understand
Even before physiological changes, there's something strange in moving. 200m from my house, my brain starts to have different ideas.

I cannot keep from thinking that our brain and our legs are connected neurologically. They tap on the same space exploration abstractions.
I’m guessing it’s a great way to get fined or even banned from landing at the airports worth landing at.
From what I’ve seen of Vitalik Buterin‘s stuff he goes deep diving into subjects and doesn’t leap until it’s clear to him it isn’t going to blow up in a spectacular fashion.

I don’t particularly care about what he gets up to but I don’t think he has any bad intentions behind what he does.

On the other hand, having an adversity to risk might be a positive thing if you’re illegally investing other peoples’ money.
“On Friday, the theater publication Playbill also said it would stop posting to its Twitter account, which has 412,000 followers. It said it would focus its social media efforts on Facebook, Instagram and TikTok.” -Nyt. I suspect others will be joining this trend…
Timetrack Jr: CLI time tracking in rust
Is saying “most of something” a universal generalisation?

The comment didn’t say “you’re not a crypto enthusiast _unless_ you believe X”. It just made an assertion (which, for what it’s worth, I think is incorrect) that the majority have a certain belief.
Weight is only a portion of good health.
What about a 'twitch plays stable diffusion' kind of thing where each visitor can enter a prompt for the next iteration?
https://arbor.bfh.ch/17195/ describes how to accept BTC or ETH using GNU Taler.
this is a social behavior not shared with people who aren't on social media or exercise in private gyms.
The Epic Collapse of Sam Bankman-Fried's FTX Exchange: A Crypto Markets Timeline
Uh, what the hell is that cursor follow circle thing? https://cs.joshstrange.com/e5RKH0

It's like if someone said "Can we come up with something worse/more annoying than overriding scroll behavior?"

I couldn't read the article, that cursor thing was way too distracting. Also I have a hard time taking someone seriously who would add that to their website.
In the exception code a foo.eof() check need to be in foo.read().

So I guess the runtime in theory should be the same and the implementation happened to be slow. Maybe eol() did some syscall each time instead of caching a EOF int like in C.
May be Linneaus and Cuvier as well.
I think the other poster is saying that if Alameda or FTX were losing money on trades, someone smarter was on the other side of those trades, but I dont think that is necessarily true.
I agree, the fediverse seems to be one of the places the "old internet" moved to.

But personally I haven't found the waves of Twitter users running from Musk to be part of that. For the most part they seem to be running into the fediverse and expecting the same culture that Twitter had.

As these sorts of waves tend to always go, I expect it to either fizzle out or to ruin the culture that everyone prior to them got to enjoy. Although maybe the fediverse will be a bit more resilient to this due to being less centralized.
Think of Svix as a meta-SaaS...

If you use other SaaS'es (AKA, Web Services) -- then Svix is a SaaS to make sure that those services work smoothly, and to help you fix/debug them faster and easier if for some reason they ever don't...

Opinion: Brilliant Idea!

I see everyone with a nontrivial website that uses scripts tied to web services -- as potentially needing this or something like this in the future...

Anyway, wishing the Svix team a lot of luck in their endeavor!
https://twitter.com/AutismCapital/status/1591333446995283969

Here's Caroline (Sam's girlfriend, and the person who was running Alameda Research, the fund that he was shoveling customer deposits into to prop up) talking about her amphetamine use: https://twitter.com/carolinecapital/status/13790363463003054...
The person behind the checkmark was a real person/entity and whatever they said, true or disinformation - they owned it. That is the difference.

If Candice Owens had said something detestable, at least I knew that I was being triggered by the actual troll.
Sigh. I let myself go weeks without exercising and feel terrible, both mentally and physically.
So basically, it was worthless before and now it's worthless again so relatively zero change in intrinsic values
Note that Linux is basically getting the whole Plan9 feature set added to it, if in incremental and unplanned ways. AIUI, a kernel feature for implementing block devices in user space was added quite recently.
I personally think media reports of most academic results is a distraction. Experts would surely start to weigh in very soon if this result is as significant as claimed. It doesn't hurt to wait a bit before discussing it. As the story of Zhang is an inspiring one, I don't fault mass media from jumping on it. However, I don't think a serious scientific journal like Nature should be doing this.
what are the best practices for dumping a significant amount of illiquid shitcoins under time pressure?
An apothecary is a person -- or an establishment where such a person works -- not a garden. Odd use of the word.
Individually this is hard. People grow up inside of families and cultures that are "blame and punish". This kind of culture ends up being self-destructive: people can't learn from their mistakes, and will do anything to avoid blame and the punishment (loss of status, money, etc...) that comes with it. In this culture, dishonesty, manipulation and politics are the norm. Incidentally, iteration and coordination is difficult because there is no incentive to do things where you may be blamed for others out of your span of influence.

On the other side, there is a "culture of learning", where we expect sometimes to fail, and we save blame and punishment for people who do not learn from their failures (in practice, this is a lot like repeating the same behavior and expecting a different outcome). Yes, sometimes a mistake is costly, but if the person making the mistake learns not to repeat it, we win. If we find a way to make that mistake impossible in the future, we win. In this environment, honesty can be expected (confessing within reason), and will be the norm. In a culture of learning, iteration becomes a way of life and cross organization coordination is much easier.

In my business life I much prefer a culture of learning or one of blame, and in hiring, especially mid a senior level people, I'm careful to hire people that value learning and like to put problems on trial instead of people.
Martin Scorsese is starting on a rough draft and Jonah Hill getting into character.
> Even before physiological changes, there's something strange in moving. 200m from my house, my brain starts to have different ideas.

> I cannot keep from thinking that our brain and our legs are connected neurologically. They tap on the same space exploration abstractions.

Absolutely. Something happens during a bike marathon where my body and brain are eventually independent of my thoughts and I'm moving on autopilot with mild tunnel vision while thinking about complex thoughts, old memories, things I could have handled better. I can only attribute it to persistent eustress and the post-metabolic state of endorphin saturation combined with adrenaline.
The first mistake is to exclude the brain from the body. The brain is just another part of the body. It doesn’t live in a universe of its own hermetically sealed off from the body. It is the body! Every region of you is you. Certainly, some regions (I hesitate to use the word “parts“ with all its mechanistic baggage) are more critical to your existence and operation, but that doesn’t have anything to do with your identity qua identity. The brain is seamless with “the rest”, and in a state of mutual and coherent dependence with “the rest”.

(Now, I can argue that the intellect as abstracting faculty is not material, but this faculty is not disconnected from the brain and needs the brain to operate, and so again, the health of the body affects even those faculties which, strictly speaking, are not bodily per se.)
Blaming crypto here is the same as to blame US dollar for Bernie Madoff shenanigans.
Maybe the non-calm exercisers are also loading up on stimulants.
Australia gives world-first approval for fecal transplants to restore gut health
Yeah, Python docs are crap, PHP docs are the gold standard IMO (although Julia's docs are pretty frosty too. (I don't know anything about Go's docs.))

(I am not joking. I am not trolling. I love Python, but the documentation is mostly like notes taken by a distracted teenager.)
It could be because Argentina has a lot of “Cuevas” which is an illegal exchange where you can swap crypto for USD. Plus a host of other things you can get away with down there.
9 is the recent low, but presumably GP would consider 10 to be a good deal, too. Typically companies with a solid future making a reasonable profit are about 20 - 30; historically META is about in this range. If META still has "normal" prospects, then it is pretty undervalued.

However, this is not a Buffett view on things, as he evaluates based on intrinsic value rather than P/E. He also avoids tech companies because it's hard to figure out what their intrinsic value is. KO (Coca-Cola) for example, is going to grow about as much as GDP, it has a long history of 30% net profit, it has a huge moat so the dynamics of the company aren't likely to change. Thus one can actually attempt to evaluate its intrinsic value: what would you pay for a bond that earned 30% every year? Do the present value calculation and there you go. But what is META's prospects 10, 20, 30 years from now? Hard to say, and the social media landscape keeps changing. So Buffett would not invest in META--a P/E of 9 might be a steal, but it might also be an indication that the prospects of the company are no longer so positive as they were two years ago.

(AAPL is a notable exception to Buffett not investing in tech, because of how their products reinforce each other to create a large moat. At this point I think it is also fairly likely that Apple will be around making computers for the foreseeable future--even OS 9 didn't kill them off, and now they have market leading hardware and a solid OS and compelling ecosystem. In this way of thinking, one could argue they have similar dynamics as KO, but with the advantage that they have growth prospects. They also are returning 30% to shareholders, mostly in the form of huge stock buybacks. Hence Buffett has been a massive buyer of AAPL recently.)
It seems to me that most people can transcend the self when discussing abstract ideas (say, the topic of conversation is cognitive bias), but during certain object level conversations (say, political matters) the ability seems to essentially vanish. People can realize they are subject to bias when considering that abstract idea directly, but not when they are contemplating object level matters.

I think the phenomenon is fairly decently explained by Mike Tyson: "Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face".
When I clicked the link, my browser (Brave on Android) gave a popup saying "did you mean taleo.net, lots of scam websites try and make similar names.

I've never seen a warning like that, but it's at least an interesting coincidence given Brave is vaguely crypto-scam focused. I don't know enough about either Brave or Taler to know of there is any overlap in their interests, it's more likely just a coincidence, but still odd
Build systems transform source code into binaries or whatever the needed target is for target environment.

The alternative is live systems where the source code is compiled and interned for immediate use in the running system. Examples include: Lisp machines, Smalltalk, and Forth.

There mught be other paradigms as well.
Banned by whom and why do you think that?
perhaps its simply the pra tice of running for office that is the therapy

I hold office in local politics, it's stupid boring
I have never seen /g/ discuss it outside of DigiCash's failure.
In /biz/ there is a general sense of dread about anything related to "CBDCs". /biz/xmr has a more balanced opinion

You comment about cryptocurrency backed chaumian cash, there is already a project for this aimed at increasing the efficiency and privacy of bitcoin spends: https://fedimint.org/
Conflicting information says that flight is billionaire Joe Lewis who frequently travels between the Bahamas and his Argentinian property.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Lewis_(British_businessman...
Her Dad and the Chair of the SEC were department colleagues? It's always who you'd expect.
This looks bad. Well, the writing was on the wall since the device scanning plans.

I hope Apple loses a hefty sum of money for a clear wakeup call.

They need to make a decision now, double down on the commitment to protect the users privacy, or go the Google way and lose the privacy concious customers, which I could imagine could be quite many.
I'd wager that most professional office setting americans walk less than 5000 steps a day.
Whatever you want to call it, it explicitly invades people's privacy. It would only gain adoption if the alternative, which is digital cash, is prohibited, in which case privacy in private financial interactions would be criminalized and we would be subject to warrantless mass surveillance.
Language Design: Familiarity
He could apply. It would be denied, of course.
Ask HN: Need expert advice related to Outsourcing
We are a AI company specialized in providing Deeplearning based document extraction services, our software in beta. Due to the limitation on team size we are planning to out source our frontend website and landing page. We are planning to outsource this task, my concern is which is this a good idea or bad. Is outsourcing to other countries for say Philippines, India, Brazil, Bangladesh. Which is the best
It occurred, it’s just a tight fight.
Okay that’s the funniest thing I have read today. Thank you.
Single datapoint: I ran 50k per week on average for 1.5 years during Covid. I don’t feel it changed my cognitive ability. I also deeply believe that exercise should make a difference in these areas. I’m at a loss to explain the lack of impact that it had.
I wouldn't say that Plan 9 has better (basic) ideas than Unix, it's more like a Unix that follows the old ideas even for new things. AFAIU many of the ugly aspects of "contemporary Unix" stem from the Unix wars and later additions by people with less design sense than the Bell Labs group.
I'm pretty sure if I were an international fugitive with a gigantic afro that's recognizable a mile away, the first thing I would do is shave it off.
I came here to post the same thing re: Ratey's work. Spark has been an important book for me, it's the reason I bought an exercise bike for my apartment. I've always worked out 2 or 3 times per week, but extended high heart rate cardio was something I always avoided before I discovered the neurological/cognitive benefits.
> I met a drove of Jane Street interns who thought exactly the same way, in terms of "EV" or expected value

It's interesting that you say that. When I read the article claiming that a trader should be neutral between $50 and $100 with 50%, I saw that as an oversimplification for dramatic effect. But what you describe seems like they actually thought like that, which strikes me as bizarre. If you lose your entire budget, it doesn't matter that your winning probability was >50%, so you should always adjust the size of your bets to the size of your budget. While it practically doesn't matter, of course, when people on 6-digit salaries gamble over $10 ice cream, it makes a difference in principle (and the whole purpose of the exercise seems to have been to instil a principle). I'd have expected them to drill their interns on some variation of a Kelly criterion.
Anyone who watches Silicon Valley and uses it as a blueprint to start a successful VS firm deserves to keep that money, tbf. That show is a straight up mockery of the tech world.
I think governments will attempt to use the FTX and other thefts to justify a "Digital Currency" issued by Central Banks, while leaving BTC and the rest alone, taxing any profits.

Government controlled digital currency should scare the heck out of anyone who thinks about it for a bit. The next step after that is the prohibition of cash.

I'm not sure if they'll be able to pull it off, or not.
Interesting read. A few days ago I stumbled over a twitter profile from a person who was seemingly living in one of those poor countries and was writing stuff like "the rich don't care about food for the poor" and "please send BNB to this address to help me living". Made me quite sad and makes me still think about it!

Unfortunately, twitter does not provide a history of tweets/profiles I have visited; I hope they add something like reddit. Would really like to revisit this account now.
You're conflating two issues. One, the benefit of exercise on mental health, and two, the side effects of the gym lifestyle and culture.
I'd argue against that. If you offer someone a choice between a suduko puzzle or a solidly difficult workout before they're allowed to get one with their evening, I'd guess most people would choose the puzzle. Drumming up the mental fortitude to force yourself to do something difficult is a cognitive challenge.
There’s rarely an upside to apologizing. It’s way easier to make someone else look worse than to do better. So blowing tiny mistakes out of proportion to take others down a peg is an effective strategy.

Most mistakes don’t matter. They cost so little, and the alternative to small mistakes is so much worse, that a mistake is the best outcome systematically if you consider the all-in costs.

You can make “no mistakes” but take forever to get anything done, and that is more costly all in, but you didn’t make a “mistake” that anyone can pin on you. But if your organization can’t account for those costs, or even comprehend them, “no mistakes” becomes the target.

”No mistakes” turns out to be ruinous, because nobody was allowed to make small errors, move fast, and learn along the way.
You could do that with Monero as well. Ultimately, you would use a taxable system because you’re honest and want to pay taxes. So nothing about using Monero prevents the parties from reporting their transactions to tax authorities. Just as nothing prevents merchants from reporting their cash transactions.
> I think 99% of people watch free/ad-supported porn

Huh. You'd be surprised.

> anyone concerned about civil asset forfeiture is likely either a criminal, or a conspiracy theorist and/or paranoid schizo

This right here is the problem. Your argument goes along the lines of: I am doing nothing wrong/illegal therefore I have nothing to worry about. This assumes perfect laws, perfect law enforcement and following proper procedures. Sorry to burst your bubble but this is not how the real world works. You don't need to prove anything and you shouldn't just throw away your rights because you want to prove you're not schizo.

In the case you are a criminal, should the punishment fit the crime and should there be due process or are we just going to throw anyone that breaks a law, any law in jail and sentence them to death?

How many laws do you break during a day? https://www.businessinsider.com/most-commonly-broken-laws-in...
Should the government just come in an take all your stuff now because they suspect you've connected to an unsecured wifi? They don't even need to prove anything and poof... your stuff is gone. this is civil asset forfeiture. This is how dumb it is.
Are there tools to evaluate (imperfectly) the percent of a binary that actually gets used?

Like, run an application, run the watcher tool, then “walk the application” as best as possible and get an output: “35% of the binary was never read.” ?

What’s on my mind is evaluating the actual result of tools and methods for not including unnecessary things. I struggle with this in web land. Tree shaking and such does a wonderful job but I honestly don’t know how much of my bundle is still superfluous.
I think he tries any avenue available. Even if 50% is lost it's still a good trade.
I used the general report form. That seemed to work.
Ah! I had no idea FDIC didn't cover robbery. Thanks for clarifying!
A hacker who got in from the outside would probably be sophisticated enough to at least
1. automate transfers
2. launder through monero or a tumbler or something

This looks like someone who barely understands crypto because all of the transfers can be traced, and since they're apparently working manually and slowly, the audit-surface is huge.
I just fixed this situation in a house from the 70s. Cable coax lines grounded to a metal hose bib ... which, in the crawl space, switches to PEX about a foot away from the bib.

Cable guy installing high speed internet was all "nope!". I think the previous owners just had crap internet and didn't ever get into why.
I read this title as "what if regular expressions are the best cognitive exercise?"

And decided I would rather just be dumb in the span of 2 seconds.
You can't turn off an ultra-hi-res NRO satellite which is viewing/recording this plane's flight in real time.
A bad neutral isn't going to trigger a brownout that reproduces reliably in some random gzip code when you're booting fully into Windows, on a modern CPU with fine grained frequency/voltage scaling, on a battery-powered laptop, powered by a switched-mode power supply with tons of capacitance in every single layer on the way to the CPU.

The most plausible explanation I can think of would be if the return current is flowing through the monitor and EMI from that is disturbing things, but 60Hz might as well be DC to modern signal rates, so that's tantamount to blaming witchcraft.
Yes, it is a relative thing, not a determinative thing.

It's hard to talk about this without tripping on ableism - but - Stephen Hawkins started out with such a great cognitive ability that a deficit later in life would have been less noticeable. Life is more than a cognitive experience, it's a human experience. Hawkins' human experience was not great. I've read that he was very hard on the people close to him. Even if exercise 'only' helped with dealing with emotions, that would still show up as a cognitive improvement - it's hard to think straight when you are upset.

> I'm not convinced that the opposite is true.

I'm not entirely sure what 'the opposite' means. "You are a brain on a stick"? It is evident that the brain does not survive without the body. It is evident that the brain is affected by what the body does. The body is not a stick.

The brain does compute, but it is not a computer. A computer does not actively take in information about the world. A computer does not form familial and tribal affiliations. A computer has a very limited experience of the world.
almost surely an insider.
Agreed! I read the comment within the context of the termux setup.
was just wondering about your new HN account reg, is all