skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sorry, I don't know all of the correct terminology. Is it the "landing pads"? Here is the code that is generated for main (after removing that constructor so it ends up without he extra call), and this is all in the text segment... and this definitely isn't "the happy path standing alone".

0000000000401160 <main>:
401160: 53 push %rbx
401161: e8 8a 00 00 00 callq 4011f0 <construct>
401166: e8 85 00 00 00 callq 4011f0 <construct>
40116b: e8 80 00 00 00 callq 4011f0 <construct>
401170: e8 8b 00 00 00 callq 401200 <destruct>
401175: e8 86 00 00 00 callq 401200 <destruct>
40117a: e8 81 00 00 00 callq 401200 <destruct>
40117f: b8 08 00 00 00 mov $0x8,%eax
401184: 5b pop %rbx
401185: c3 retq
401186: 48 89 c7 mov %rax,%rdi
401189: e8 52 00 00 00 callq 4011e0 <__clang_call_terminate>
40118e: 48 89 c7 mov %rax,%rdi
401191: e8 4a 00 00 00 callq 4011e0 <__clang_call_terminate>
401196: 48 89 c7 mov %rax,%rdi
401199: e8 42 00 00 00 callq 4011e0 <__clang_call_terminate>
40119e: 48 89 c3 mov %rax,%rbx
4011a1: e8 5a 00 00 00 callq 401200 <destruct>
4011a6: e8 55 00 00 00 callq 401200 <destruct>
4011ab: eb 18 jmp 4011c5 <main+0x65>
4011ad: 48 89 c7 mov %rax,%rdi
4011b0: e8 2b 00 00 00 callq 4011e0 <__clang_call_terminate>
4011b5: 48 89 c7 mov %rax,%rdi
4011b8: e8 23 00 00 00 callq 4011e0 <__clang_call_terminate>
4011bd: 48 89 c3 mov %rax,%rbx
4011c0: e8 3b 00 00 00 callq 401200 <destruct>
4011c5: 48 89 df mov %rbx,%rdi
4011c8: e8 93 fe ff ff callq 401060 <_Unwind_Resume@plt>
4011cd: 48 89 c7 mov %rax,%rdi
4011d0: e8 0b 00 00 00 callq 4011e0 <__clang_call_terminate>
4011d5: 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 nopw %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
4011dc: 00 00 00
4011df: 90

The issue isn't the non-executable code: it is that it generates a lot more executable code that it intermixes with all of the rest of the code next to the code that relies on it, which is great for the performance of quickly being able to jump into the exceptional case but heavily dilutes the code cache and implies many more page faults and TLB misses.
Or, rather, pays literally all the time, exceptions or no.
This is a perfect Unstuck in 15 question. Unstuck in 15 is a framework to get clarity in 15 minutes with 3 questions.

The first question could be: What are all of the options available to you?

You have move and change careers. One might be working in a lucrative job and creating side projects. Another is exploring different industries and seeing what those job titles are. They could be something unfamiliar such as “intrapreneur”

The second question could be: What information is missing about your options? You’re doing a bit of this by asking about tech jobs.

I worked as an AI product manager. There’s tons of opportunities in AI. If you’re wanting more strategy work look into becoming a product manager (not to be confused with project manager). Although I suspect you’ll eventually go back to wanting to build. Strategy is mostly stakeholder communications and negotiation.

The third question is always nuanced and depends on the person and situation. In this case it might be along the lines of: What are all of the ways you can advance toward a career in product design despite the constraints?

There’s voluntary apprenticeship, making things and sharing your process on social media, creating lucrative Udemy courses on product design…
FTX is (or was) barely 3 years old. And Sequoia invested just last year.
They don't even have to know much. They will be approached by people who does.

Money laundering can be lossy and even very lossy, the result will always be better than zero.
Maths/Physics now need a full time career just to reach the current frontier of knowledge, you have to build on existing ground, Athletes must somehow take time to learn this knowledge, and by the time they have learned it, they are not as physically fit as they once were.

Alan Turing was a good runner.
While it's true that Boston Dynamics robots can barely walk, they can't write coherent and innovative stories, solve abstract problems, or other related tasks at all yet.
so like the billionaire version of the white Ford Bronco
> Or do you mean that your implementation of fs.FS generates the content on-demand, when net/http serves it?

It's closer to this. The actual content was already written to an sqlite db, and my read-only FS allows reading that data back out but as a filesystem.

The admittedly not that interesting (and probably bad - I'm new to Go) code is here[1], and this "BlogFS" is used in 2 places:

- During "export" where it generates the static site. "Folder A" is my FS and "Folder B" is the destination i.e. an actual folder on the real filesystem.

- In a preview server that just serves "Folder A" directly.

[1]: https://git.sr.ht/~nhanb/bloghead/tree/40b70cadb01c14f1e3bf5...
The site crypto.com remains.

The Dogecoin is convertible to medical grade metal.

Astroids like Psyche with their metal content and the projected growth towards a CIS Lunar economy as discussed at places like MIT fit together in a picture of a neat future where people use the crypto.com visa metal card without any worries.

The fallover at MtGox and FTX is a learning opportunity for all players and the referee.
Don't most mammals have about the same number of joints? This implies a very small part of our mind is responsible for that.

Even pumpkin toadlets, who famously can't coordinate their landings, the problem isn't the size of their brain, it's their vestibular system.

I'm of the opinion that most animals are probably a lot higher up the sentience scale than is the current social consensus, but I don't think exercise is itself a major cognitive effort. Arbitrary games sure (not just the rules, anything social involves modelling multiple entities like yourself), but not the physical exercise itself.
There's also the WARN act.
Written in Go. Not done yet. https://github.com/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial
Wasn't the point of decimation, if there was one, to make the soldiers themselves decide who was executed?
Working out makes you more cognitively sharp because it increases the rate of fluid transfer throughout your body and increases metabolism. Ancillary effects of this are calmness, endorphins, and regulated sleep. There I said it, no magic science required. You bring balance in, you get balance out. This ain't the type of cut throat science most of you on HN expect, but sometimes the simple explanation is the one.
The smart contacts have a blacklist that the companies can add to, that would disable transfers.
I don’t think letting a small group of insiders define their own ethics is a good idea.
Of course they knew - someone needed to sign off on that transfer.

I posted this comment in another thread, but some very good on-chain evidence that Alameda was posting a huge chunk of FTT that it received as part of the original FTT ICO back to FTX as collateral, and that SBF tweeted lies about that transaction at the end of September: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33568688
I've never used a boot environment. Is there a way to use a boot environment to have a ZFS-backed Windows install?
In the hopes someone will see this: Why isnt this the standard? I've never been in the position of coordinating multiple engineers, but when I look at my colleagues code I never ever once cared about their individual commits. What am I missing?
the cloud benefit is in the version control, branching, merging, multiplayer, never having to send files, always working in the same version as everyone else. It's in everything communication, not in quickly calculating a fillet.

I also got very sad when I learned it was bought by PTC.
Sorry for playing the devil's advocate but policing officers being stupid or arrogant and behaving with contempt for the law is not an American exclusive.

In Canada and many European countries they do the same, too.
A very Reacher Gilt (https://discworld.fandom.com/wiki/Reacher_Gilt) move.

Or perhaps Cosmo Lavish is more appropriate here. Delusions of grandeur included. ( https://discworld.fandom.com/wiki/Cosmo_Lavish )
Pick a minimal backend framework (express, Sinatra, flask) and a database (postgres or SQLite) and read their docs.
Both are centrally managed and are semi-regularly frozen at the request of authorities.
ASPD? Not focussing on important work sounds more like ADHS, no?
Gambler mentality:

1. "Invest" (borrow/steal) large amount of money

2. Bet as a madman and obviously win big cause I'm such a hot shot

3. Repay every debt and take profit!

4. How could that have gone wrong?!?!!1

What's the difference?
https://old.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/yt3uie/_/iw...
All of the senior executives (including CEOs) were living together in the same house in the Bahamas and allegedly were involved in a polyamorous relationship.

So under those circumstances surely everyone knew what everyone else was doing.
This is one of the allures of Forza Horizon for me. On the surface, it's an MMRPG, with social, collection, crafting, levels, puzzles, competition, et al, all of that can be turned off / ignored as desired.

With those items off, it's a great place to "drive" around, with different climates, seasons, amazing views, etc. Drive a classic convertible along a beachfront road. Explore dirt roads in an SUV during a snow storm.

It's no driving simulator, but it's a pleasant way to get away from the world for a while. If you've got the winter blahs and like driving / scenery, plug your PC or Xbox into the biggest display you have and get away for a while.
They don’t deport (think Nazies and other scum that run away there)
Do you think it’s at all likely they were able to exfiltrate the keys or escalate privileges by pushing the malicious update? It’s not an iOS or android update from my understanding, just an update to the backend/content server.
I’m pretty sure I’ve made it clear that I’m glad people are enjoying Mastodon but I take issue when everyone seems to be omitting the tradeoffs. To make things worse im being seen as some kind of concern troll for pointing it out.
If this really is him, the conspiracy buff would say it's an intermediate stop on the way to a place without an extradition treaty with the USA.
2008/2009 was pretty late in the game for such a large ship like Nokia to change course. Their financial situation back then was still good enough to no bother with a massive change of course.

Sure, you saw it, but Nokia management was out of touch and more preoccupied with the next quarter rather than with the next 3 years, as it the case in many large old companies.
Youtube swamped with crypto scams again
This has been a problem for years. How have they not yet fixed this even though everyone has been talking about how bad the problem is

The usual fake Ark Livestream again. They always choose Ark.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mANMN9tfXfI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5ooDRyFz1w

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvNWC03hLC8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koqminBKMiQ

liveark.io

tesla-future.com

teslarich.com

bitcoin collection from liveark.io (over 1.2 and counting...damn)

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1Ccsc9rTXw9duXCBDqQRLHTfH2BXmd6aSv?page=1

collection from tesla-future.com (.8 btc)

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1FPHFYbHS5CCTbtyEGfHk9MMynNeqv4Jdb

Doesn't YouTube have thousands of employees. Not a single one can shut these obvious scam down. One of them is up for 12 hours. What a joke.

As the price of BTC keeps falling the obvious benefit will mean less money for YouTube scammers.
I sense an air of derision, so I'll leave you with this: A lion ain't shit but a snack for three.
>UK central bank went to battle with PM

I thought it went like this:
>PM announces tax cuts
>no way those cuts can meet budget
>panic in market for long maturity gilts
>sudden spikes in benchmark rates are bad for everyone so BoE announces YCC

Did I miss something? Did Truss somehow take a swipe at the BoE? I'll be honest, I didn't pay super close attention.
I’ve got a really obscure personal anecdote. I have cerebral palsy. For all intents and purposes it’s really mild. It only really affects my left hand and slightly my left foot.

I’ve been an average runner at times in my life (10 minute miles up to 15Ks), a part time fitness instructor for slightly over a decade from my mid 20s to mid 30s extra.

What I noticed when it came to anything highly choreographed like dancing or a complex fitness routine and trying to listen to the beat and stay on beat, even though I can physically do the moves, it takes me a lot longer to process choreography than most people. It was mentally much more challenging and tiring than anything I do at my day job (software development).

I don’t see how simple exercise could be cognitive exercise. I could completely zone out while running.
Depends on the relevant margin. If you get adequate sleep then sleeping more won't help (and may actually hurt) but exercise can actually raise the baseline. To use a very rough analogy, sleep is like the fan in your computer. If it's working optimally it ensures you can utilize the CPU close to its physical limit. But exercise is like upgrading the CPU.
The smart contract has an array of frozen addresses that will not be permitted to move funds, which can be edited by Centre and Tether respectively.
https://twitter.com/antoniogm/status/1591457012613001216?s=2...

>Imagine being an international criminal fugitive and most wanted person on the globe, in whatever airport or bolthole you're fleeing through or hiding in, and pausing to unfollow people you don't like on Twitter.

On a phone you’re logged into, on some local internet.
> You are not a brain on a stick

We probably are not, but I'm not convinced that the opposite is true.

Stephen Hawkins did not notoriously exercise much, given his condition, and yet he died at 76, despite the odds.

Einstein routinely walked a few miles a day and that's all the exercise he did.

Many other popular great thinkers of the past spent a lot more time on books than improving their bodies.

In Italy we learn as children about Giacomo Leopardi, a very popular poet, writer and philosopher of the 19th century, according to Wikipedia "considered the greatest Italian poet of the nineteenth century and one of the most important figures in the literature of the world", that His continual studies undermined an already fragile physical constitution, and his illness, probably Pott's disease or ankylosing spondylitis, denied him youth's simplest pleasures

Without evidence I reckon that all we can conclude is that only sometimes exercise is the best cognitive exercise, but we don't know why nor if it is actually true.
The question you're posing assumes an argument the comment you're responding to doesn't make. It's not whether "preventing fraud, money laundering or terrorism funding" makes things better, it's whether the processes put in place are effective towards combating those things. It would be upsetting to know a $2b pipeline for catching these things were only able to detect $2m worth of illicit funds for example.

Your comment is also assuming funds would only be seized for a shared definition of "fraud, money laundering or terrorism" when that is not always the case. Preventing "terrorism" by placing embargoes on all individuals of disagreeable governments would seem like an overreach for many individuals with family overseas.
TheOnion submissions to hacker news are rare, which makes this a nice opportunity to look at past ones: https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=theonion.com
Here is an example of Argentina extraditing someone to the US:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jan/03/argentina-agre...
Not a single scientist?
But it's not a big deal if you show up to the gas station and they're out of gas. We trust these huge companies, but if your local McDonald's is closed today you're not losing your savings.

Entrusting a company with your savings is an entirely different matter. The only reason people trust banks is because of government regulation and insurance. And sensible people are well aware of FDIC insurance, and of how losing all your money was not an uncommon thing back in the days when there were runs on banks. Sensible people are also aware of Enron and Lehman Bros and Bernie Madoff. These aren't obscure references -- they're household names.

So no, I disagree completely -- sensible people absolutely do not hold large quantities of money on unregulated, uninsured crypto exchanges. Entrusting your savings to an unregulated, uninsured company only 3 years old is a level of risk eons beyond trusting a gas station to fill up your car.
Too bad memes can't be included: "<i> is profanity. --- Change my mind."
Agency really doesn't matter to responsibility. "I didn't mean to step on your foot." We are responsible even for our own involuntary actions.
Sure, you could build a weight lifting robot just by increasing it's raw mechanical ability. But to build one that's made of hundreds of strings only capable of individually lifting a single pound and coordinating them around multiple axes to lift hundreds of pounds would be much more difficult.

But there's really no reason to do that since you can just increase the raw mechanics.
This is how the FTX-Alameda perpetual motion machine worked. Alameda was a bad/failing prop trading firm. FTX appeared to be valuable because smarter firms were attracted to the exchange by the opportunity to take money from Alameda. In order to perpetuate the appearance, FTX had to inject money into Alameda, so Alameda could continue their negative strategies, so the exchange appeared to be busy. The more Alameda lost, the more smarter people showed up to take their money, and the faster FTX had to shovel funds into the hole. This abruptly stopped working as soon as inflows to FTX stopped arriving.

The whole scheme has now entered the "whoopsie we got hacked" phase that inevitably concludes every crypto scam, in which the insiders are liquidating and laundering depositor's coins, and buying real estate in non-extradition countries.
hi slater! Please proceed

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCNd5DutF4c
Judging by where it fails, the filleting itself in OpenCascade has no problems keeping track of edges, where it seems to have difficulty is 1) saddle points, and 2) where the fillet size makes it intersect with a feature it's not responsible for.

A fillet breaking when a parameter update changes the topology is just a specific example of the topological naming problem. I don't think that's specific to OpenCascade. In fact, just thinking it through, I wouldn't be at all surprised if 2) above is the same thing: the fillet itself changes the object topology enough that the basis edges for the fillet get lost. If so that's a Freecad thing rather than an OpenCascade thing.

Maybe someone who's worked in that area can comment, it might be one of those things that gets better in 0.21.
>why is the use on a black or a grey market a put-down for a currency?

The lack of accountability in black market transactions is a feature. In regular transactions this is a hindrance.

The basic examples I can think of would be preventing funding terrorism or human trafficking - which I personally think is a net good. Or even more basically the ability to contest and reverse charges.
I think most governments would want to keep excavated artifacts of historical significance within their borders, permit or not. No government is going to give you a permit to take their region's history from them. I'd expect the litmus test to broadly be "if you took something of value, that's bad".

Whether it's illegal to own one of these artifacts is going to vary. Some countries have laws that make it illegal, but many don't. It's usually always impossible to legitimately sell these artifacts, since you can't show provenance (and if you could, the provenance would show that they were stolen). Just like stolen art can't be sold—even after many years and owners—trafficked artifacts can't be sold either.
I don't like C++ Syntax 2. I like the idea of bringing safety to C++, but I believe that Syntax 2 is an excuse create a new language and reuse the C++ name.

It reminds me of what Google did with AngularJS and Angular. It is dishonest on its face and turns me off toward listening further.

C++ has this issue of every few years looking entirely different. There's no long-lasting thought about how changes or additions to the language will echo into perpetuity.

I do not know the totality of what issues we face when working with C++ (or C) outside of say, bounds safety, optimization issues that cause undefined behavior, and implicit conversion problems, but I do have a feeling that every time I see safety issues in C++ (or C) they can almost always be addressed by using an already existing safe alternative, asking whether or not a supposed "valid" optimization should be considered valid if in combination with another optimization it causes undefined behavior, or creating library functions which assist with converting what would otherwise be implicit type conversions to explicit with error checking.
Nucleus? How's its Weissman score?
A dedicated weight-lifting robot could have far fewer degrees of movement. It could essentially be a couple of pistons at a camber with one more powered axis for balance.
Shouldn’t people working laborious jobs have higher than normal office jobs cognitively healthy?
We can see in real-time how the 'hacker' moves the stolen money around, we get to read SBFs private conversations with Elon Musk, and we can track his private plane.

For all the shit-show that is going on, this level of transparency is a great dividend the internet provides us. It's harder than ever before for the powerful class to act in the dark. It's not a lot, but it is something.
The market doesn't care whether you understand it. So long as you pull your money out before the bubble deflates back to or below the level at which you initially invested, you will make money. There is a risk that the bubble could just pop when the public gets cold feet, but "the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent" cuts both ways.

The primary problem with bubble economics is ethical, not utilitarian. Just like in a casino, every dollar you make in a bubble is a dollar someone else has lost (or will lose when they cash out too late).
And there's no mechanism in place to prevent corporate centralization from being built atop those blockchains. It doesn't matter what they we or were not created to do, it's that the flexibility permitted within them exposes them to this kind of problem.
Did you sell it?
The power consumption per day is 550W
That Sequoia letter aged amazingly poorly in just two months.
"...FTX—a company that may very well end up creating the dominant all-in-one financial super-app of the future. Nothing is a sure bet in crypto, but just the possibility that FTX could join—or even eclipse—the big four of American banking (JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo and Citibank) means it’s already valued at $32 billion."
More emphasis should have been on the "nothing is a sure bet".
Why would the attacker move the funds to any remotely censorable coin like DAI?
Unfortunately the most common use-case of fronting is phishing and other scams that do make our lives worse. There's a legit anti-censorship angle but it is not the major use-case.
Hardware is hard.

Making an AI that learns to control a purely virtual body appears to be a fairly standard project.

1) https://youtu.be/XrOTgZ14fJg

2) https://youtu.be/882O_7hsAms

3) https://youtu.be/1kV-rZZw50Q

4) https://youtu.be/gn4nRCC9TwQ
There are tons of successful scientists that are in shape. Excelling intellectually and physically both require discipline.

I like to run so here is the first person I thought of:

Wolfgang Ketterle: Nobel Prize Physics & Marathon PB = 2:50

https://www.runnersworld.com/runners-stories/a20837391/im-a-...
> But having all your money in bunch of wallets kept by a single entity that is not you, is just plain stupidity.

I do exactly this with my dollars and it's worked out just fine. Modern society is based on trust. I don't want to have to inspect source code to ensure my wallet is secure.