skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
AFAIK you can use the libvirt provider for Vagrant that will use qemu VMs (via libvirtd management) from the standard Vagrant workflow, presumably solving the performance problems he mentioned.

TBH I miss Vagrant. I wish there were a Dockerfile, but for VMs.
Surely you can just eat more beans until you get enough methionine to satisfy your protein synthesis needs. We are not (yet, in the western world) at the point of having to eat a starvation diet (where the amino acid profile is actually important, since you are trying to eat as little as possible).
Go is not really an easier language than Java, though.
Lol you poor thing. No, you pay for the privilege of propping up Google's revenue. They'll still track everything you do and sell that to advertisers.
Interesting, my wife bought some 'strong' cdb oil caps and I ended up taking them - I certainly felt like I could feel them after taking one or two. Would be interested if it was all placebo as I found the effect (esp alongside 5htp) very pleasant and gave me excellent sleep.
That's the lyric Lightfoot changed when sung live, to take into account the more recent hypothesis on how it sank:

At seven p.m. it grew dark; it was then

Which is nicer to the crew (doesn't imply it was a mistake on their part) but doesn't really quite flow as nicely.
Wouldn't that be crazy!?
I suspect curated creators would be interested in managing their content. Youtube is a bad experience on both sides. And I suspect they'd need to, if nothing else, to do quality content-tagging. Some of this could be crowdsourced too.
No specific comments about this release, just want to express my admiration and gratitude for the developers. Sublime has been my daily driver for 10 years and I love it. It's the scalpel to VS Code's swiss army knife.
Yeah, it would suggest that investors make knee-jerk reactions to tweets, without spending a minute to check if it’s real news, and are completely oblivious to what is happening at Twitter.

Okay, yeah, I can believe that.
That's the underlying payment network, but a whole "industry" of institutions have grown on top of it. Those can be regulated.
> This is just willful ignorance.

If it's just a matter of calling your opponent names, you're being hysterical.

What he said isn't willful ignorance. Humanity has never been safer from extreme weather and has never been more able to adapt to changes. You'll see this reflected in the number of people dying in countries with access to reliable energy over a century or so.
swing comes from way more than implying 12/8 or however you want to charachterize shortening the ands- its also how you phrase, its your volume, and your articulation. some basic ideas here: https://youtu.be/Fg_W-t_WBBc

but its also about where you sit in the beat, and how you push and pull. i think ethan iverson said something like "a mans eighth notes are between him and god". ultimately trying to explain swing is like trying to say why a face is pretty... theres some basic ideas, but they only account for part of it
I don't think that AI image generation in its current form replaces human creativity. You still need a human to guide the process, compose the image, judge the output, etc. What's being automated is the manual, traditional process of painting and drawing.

I see this technology as more analogous to hand writing books -> printing. I predict that more people, not less, will be involved in creative industries related to visual arts (design, film, illustration, animation, etc.) as a result of this technology becoming more accessible.
octopodes nutz
Since when did Sublime Text use Qt?

Afaik they use their own UI toolkit.
The US generally protects retail investors from risk like this in other financial instruments and markets. This isn't really different, its just new enough that regulators haven't caught up. This kind of event could speed that up.
(Author here) I don't see that in Chrome so had no idea that was happening – thanks for pointing it out! I'm not a fan of coding ligatures so I just pushed a change to turn it off.
I don't think that's the entire story. Google actively pushed WebP, for example recommending it to webmasters in their page speed evaluation tools (and site performance, as judged by Google, is a factor in your search ranking).

If they invested the same resources into improving and promoting JPEG XL, we'd be using JPEG XL. I'm not saying the outcome is objectively worse, but ultimately, they did pick the winner here.
Courts and lawyers are the opposite of trusting who you're doing business with. If you actually trusted them, there would be no need for courts.

The "I don't trust you" market consists of everyone who does business using written contracts. So, nearly everyone.
I find this uncharacteristically hard to understand.

In the stock brokerage example, we're told:

>They might allow you 2:1 leverage when you buy stock: your $1,000 buys 20 shares now.

But then a couple of paragraphs later:

>But you now owe $1,000 to your brokerage, and are 1:1 levered

My brokerage offers 2:1 leverage, which results in me being 1:1 levered? I think I understand what patrick is saying here but I also find it hard to follow

On the other hand:

>One is that, because people can ask for money from their checking accounts at any time, impecunious operation of the bank could cause the value of the mortgages to be impaired just a tiny little bit at a time when people need most of the money in their checking accounts.

I've read this four or five times and I don't understand the chain of cause-and-effect here at all. Why does "people can ask for money from their checking accounts at any time" mean that "impecunious operation of the bank could cause the value of the mortgages to be impaired just a tiny little bit at a time when people need most of the money in their checking accounts"?
There’s this incredulous passage from Sequoia article that’s been taken down since. Make of it what you will

At this point, mid-2019, SBF decided to double down again—and scratch his own itch. He would bet Alameda’s multimillion-dollar trading profits on a new venture: a trading exchange called FTX. It would combine Coinbase’s stolid, regulation-loving approach with the kinds of derivatives being offered by Binance and others. He only gave himself a 20 percent chance of success, but, in his mind, SBF needed extreme risk to maximize the expected value of his lifetime earnings—and, therefore, the good his earn-to-give strategy could do. The fact that he was, by his own lights, overwhelmingly likely to fail was beside the point.

The point was this: When SBF multiplied out the billions of dollars a year a successful crypto-trading exchange could throw off by his self-assessed 20 percent chance of successfully building one, the number was still huge. That’s the expected value. And if you live your life according to the same principles by which you’d trade an asset, there’s only one way forward: You calculate the expected values, then aim for the largest one—because, in one (but just one) alternate future universe, everything works out fabulously. To maximize your expected value, you must aim for it and then march blindly forth, acting as if the fabulously lucky SBF of the future can reach into the other, parallel, universes and compensate the failson SBFs for their losses. It sounds crazy, or perhaps even selfish—but it’s not. It’s math. It follows from the principle of risk-neutrality.
The curious thing is the DoD funded development of a memory safe language in the 80s which they then didn’t use. Ada has memory safety built in.
The medieval version of "I Declare Bankruptcy!!!"
IIRC that decision was made shortly after Wojcicki (YT chief at the time) posted a video that got some incredibly huge quantity of dislikes vs likes, and/or Biden had the same issue. Don't recall the exact timeline. Dislikes disappeared shortly afterwards. Seems more likely it was in response to powerful people being upset at being disliked than commercial imperatives.
All those articles try to paint it as "open source vs closed source" or "simple vs complex" but the answer is pretty simple: the IRC itself was missing many important features. No offline messages, no multi-device support, no threads, no message archives, no message search, no inline images, no mobile phone support.

Sure, you could have added this as a separate component.. but as long as you claim "we are using IRC" there would be that one person without bouncer and web browser who keeps asking the same question over and over and whines if someones posts an image.

So Slack won on features. Turns out people can tolerate slowness and crowded interface, as long as it gets stuff done. Who would have thought.
> the real killer feature to me is the javascript target

Agree, this is amazing because you can share code and data structures between front and backend (for example: https://github.com/karaxnim/karax).

Also, it's really nice having high level stuff like metaprogramming and static typing spanning both targets. Things like reading a spec file and generating statically checked APIs for server/client is straightforward, which opens up a lot of possibilities.
The T.C. video is very thorough and worth a watch for all EV related shennanigans.
>How did you determine that the market is fine

I didn't say the market is fine. I said it's not as bad as one might think based on social media.

I lived through the .com crises and the mortgage bubble. People in my neighborhood were getting laid off across industries and jobs. People in my family and extended network were getting laid off. If you didn't get laid off, you'd know people who got laid off. Most of my career has been large boring companies and a lot of people I know work for large boring companies. My org in my company has slowed hiring, but still has openings for "critical" jobs.

That's absolutely not my experience at all right now. I know people who are jumping jobs and getting large pay bumps. Granted, some of that is slowing, but it's not like 2000 when the only response you'd get on a job site was somebody from an insurance company asking you to be an "entrepreneur" by becoming an insurance agent.
seaweed salad?

this stuff was awesome https://www.delish.com/food-news/a33596417/costco-seaweed-sa...
That's skipping over all the skill and training needed to draw, well, what most of us are unable to draw.

We can all write words with a pencil. That's not the same as drawing an original character or scene with skill.
I agree with you. I also think consumer privacy protection is important, so I'm not mad at the EU here. I'm mad at the US government for the CLOUD Act.
The unemployment numbers are phenomenal. It was around 3.5%. That means anyone filling a seat is coming from another position.

I graduated into the Great Recession. This is nothing like that. You’ll probably be able to get in at the entry level for whatever you’re going into professionally (or better).
The single piece of software I attached to in my entire life. It was a really hard decision to leave it behind.
> Lets be clear here: CBD is not a CB1 or CB2 agonist (or antagonist, or anything else).

CBD does act on CB1 and CB2: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2219532/

It also binds to a number of other receptors throughout the brain, but I don't think it's accurate to reduce its effects to a singular 5-HT1A receptor. It especially doesn't match the clinical effects, as Buspirone requires weeks to show effects while high doses of CBD are active within hours.

But you're very right that the CBD dose in this study is far lower than other studies. Typical study doses are 300mg of CBD or more.

> Dosing and pricing it like THC is simply placebo. It is not THC.

The study was of a mixed CBD/THC mixture. The patients were actually receiving a total of 0.7mg of THC per day. Not enough for overt effects, but enough to do something (and also fail any drug tests they might take).

The real flaw in this study is the lack of placebo group. You can't run a real psychiatric medication study without a control group and expect useful results.
Youtube search is nonfunctional anyway. After about 3 results, it literally just says "screw you watch these popular creators instead"
Boom and Bust in everything, including hiring. It's just that nobody knows how long the boom and bust last, but when you're in the boom take advantage of it.
The difference between C and Pascal was a certain pragmatism. Pascal (at least the original) could make it hard or impossible to do certain things. C let you do things, even things that the language designers hadn't thought of.

The difference was that C was written by people who were trying to write an OS, and they had to create a language that was able to handle all the odd things involved, like writing directly to hardware. Pascal really didn't want you to do that.

I'm not saying that Go lets you talk directly to hardware - I don't know whether it does or not. But I think that Go has the "get out of the programmers way and let them write code" approach more than, say, Haskell, or even Rust. That (plus the C-like syntax) probably is the Bell Labs feel.
How is this different from Cheatsheet?

https://formulae.brew.sh/cask/cheatsheet
From his flirtations with politics and regulations: get too big to fail.
they don't use QT; they use a custom toolkit.
Genuinely curious. Why is apple search still so bad after poaching all of these Google people?
New Tests Reveal Tesla FSD Fails to Obey “Road Closed” and “Do Not Enter” Signs
Here is the direct link to the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhOaUD5JvDM

Linked below are the test timestamps. Based on lighting it appears to all occur on the same day, I have written what time the tests appear to occur at based on the on-screen clock.

Test 1 in video appears to occur at 4:08 PM: https://youtu.be/BhOaUD5JvDM?t=0

Test 2 in video appears to occur at 4:11 PM: https://youtu.be/BhOaUD5JvDM?t=71

Test 3 in video appears to occur at 3:58 PM: https://youtu.be/BhOaUD5JvDM?t=136

Test 4 in video appears to occur at 4:00 PM: https://youtu.be/BhOaUD5JvDM?t=203

Test 5 in video appears to occur at 4:02 PM: https://youtu.be/BhOaUD5JvDM?t=274
It seems to me the great differentiator is risk-taker vs. risk-averse, not so much "smarts." The examples given in this article, Elon and Zuck have both been wildly successful at some endeavors(Tesla,SpaceX,Facebook) and have failed spectacularly at others (Twitter, Meta-verse) But they both are risk-takers. And on a long enough time-line even seemingly successful "masters of the universe" will fail at some point in their careers. What one then hopes is that you collect enough wisdom on your journey to make fewer mistakes as you go.
Mortgages in the UK are typically for 25 years, although longer ones are becoming more common.

Typically when you take out a mortgage you can fix the rate you pay for the first 1, 2, or 5 years. When that time expires you either go to a variable rate, or you might be able to lock in the rate of the day for another fixed period.

In my case I paid started paying double around 10 years in, and paid off my property in 15 years total. At the time my reasoning was that while I could invest and receive a higher return I could survive unemployment pretty well if my expenses were just gas, electricity, insurance, etc, rather than also including the mortgage.

As it turned out I made a good call, as when I owned the property outright I didn't have to receive permission from the bank to rent it out, when I later moved abroad.

Currently I'm in a foreign country and my interest rate is lower than inflation, so I'm investing instead. But I suspect I'll start overpaying in the near future, just because having no mortgage gives a lot of free monthly income and reduces life-risk.
Yes, this is different from much of art history. Instead of coming up with original characters or styles or backgrounds and palettes, we just ask a computer to do it all and usually by copying somebody that can do those things.

Art will take a hit to be sure, and the brunt of it will be taken by artists with actual skills.
Very unusual museum, highly recommend to visit. They even serve tea from Samovar on the top floor.
Yeah except for bell labs which essentially invented everything.
> Deleting a virtual card is tremendously easier than revoking my primary credit card number and updating all the vendors that are using it. It's quite easy to use a virtual card once and then delete it immediately.

Still harder and not as secure as a digital signature.

> Furthermore, I'm not worried about a virtual card being exposed to unauthorized charges, because (unlike in cryptocurrency-land) chargebacks exist.

You're not guaranteed to perform a chargeback successfully. And both vendors and customers (like you) are paying for that "service".

Chargebacks are also one of the reasons for why there is large-scale credit card fraud. And it is also why vendors are incentivized to collect personal information from you (to detect fraud before chargeback happens, for which they are greatly penalized) and why they are also incentivized to refuse service to legitimate customers in many cases (due to flagging legitimate transactions as suspicious).

Worse, when they refuse service they cannot even tell you why (as that would help fraudsters).
> how you manage state

It's already done for you by the runtime: it holds the state in the process memory. Now, with edit-compile-run-print loop if you want your state to persist between runs, you gotta implement some scheme of data persistence.

> it depends on a collection of global variables, those global variables now need some machinery around them so that they can be edited from the REPL thread.

In Erlang, you create a public named ETS table (basically, a thread-safe dictionary) and put "global settings" in there instead (and read them from there, too). I'd imagine LISP has something similar.

And mind you, I personally prefer the ECRPL instead of REPL, even when working in Python.
It's been a while since I've used an image viewer that doesn't support webp, to be fair.
In Anathem there were academics who spent their entire lives learning the history of academic scholarship for the express purpose of reminding everyone how often things are reinvented and preventing people from getting too excited when they have discovered something that was already known. I’m drawing a blank on their name, but it was one of the things about the book that I really enjoyed. It really helped to sell the setting, where the scientific method has been known and used continuously for 5,000 years or more.
I feel like it is, so I’m not sure what you’re asking. It’s sometimes error prone depending on editor, and sometimes a lengthy and manual hassle to undo many times & copy old state, and then to merge if it’s not a single contiguous block and not a single file. It’s way easier to do what I’m talking about if I’ve committed changes in git every 5 minutes, but I don’t always do that in advance (most people don’t), and therefore could be nice to have a non-linear undo UI that addresses the workflow example I’m talking about, which happens to be a common reason that people even think about what happens in multiple undo-redo scenarios in the first place. What’s wrong with pointing out that 1- we can make better tools if we want, and 2- linear undo/redo doesn’t solve the whole problem?
Nissan Ariya has a CCS port, so even Nissan has standardised on the CCS. The Nissan Leaf is the iPad with the Lightning port of the EV world.
Don't those European engineers have guaranteed health care, more than a few weeks of vacation per year, and more than 0 months of paid parental leave? Are those engineers also in tens of thousands of dollars in debt on average from university too?
Thank you, Sublime devs, for making/maintaining performant, unobtrusive software in 2022! Sublime is a role model.

Maybe a project-oriented IDE next? Want to ditch JetBrains for project-editing since it's a pig.
What legal guarantee is there that Tesla won't reverse course in the future? Say a charging station or car manufacturer adopts this connector and then in 5 years Tesla says "well actually, we've got these patents and we're going to start charging you to sell cars/charging stations"? Publishing the specs and saying "we won't enforce patents" isn't a legally binding guarantee
Gotta double up to catch up.
This where the investors including the big silicon valley investors that make billions of returns step in and make the little people whole. If BlockFi needs a line of credit to allow withdrawals, each of the investors needs to be in line to provide that credit at the expense of the partners and LPs. Officers eat last.
It pertains to anyone riding the FANG Silicon Valley Bubble created by near Zero interest rates.
maybe the real true value of crypto was the frens we made along the way
Surely. The point is all these systems have tradeoffs. I'm guessing OP would find things to be disappointed in there, too, as have many of the people who actually live in those places.

edit: especially when it comes to comp, which was how this started. The left hand (as it were) criticizing comp in tech, and the right complaining about capitalism, is my favorite part.
because absolute power corrupts absolutely.

More at 11
Done - upgraded to a t3.xlarge. Now it can process 4 images in parallel. Still not enough to keep up with HN demand, but it should chew through the queue a _bit_ faster.
I sadly gave up and switched to vscode for typescript. The language server and debugger integrations are too good to pass up, there are some really nice extensions and a much nicer way to manage them, and GitHub Copilot is pretty darn cool. Every time it hangs for hundreds of milliseconds while I'm typing I wish I could go back.

Sublime bet on its own code indexing engine and it seems like that was a mistake. I think it predates LSP, but now that LSP is a success they should embrace it with native support.
And pay a fee, just to change your keys. Remind me of the benefits of this system again?
> This seems a bit too wordy to demystify the concept.

Pretty normal for a patio11 post.
Compile times? Besides gradle’s startup time, java compiles just as fast as go imo. Go barely does any optimization, but javac does even less - so I don’t really see it a problem on actually similarly sized projects.

Memory usage is a tradeoff — a good GC works best with a bit more overhead.
> Did we really need to torture these creatures for decades to understand the importance of care giving?

Yes, we did. Look at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hospitalism people didn't even understand how much humans need care, never mind animals. The people placing these babies into care did so with the best intentions, but insufficient knowledge.

Your knowledge comes from these experiments.
How much CBD were you taking?
Sell software for a living, and have for 5+ years. Find people who you think might be interested in what you have to offer (from your network, linkedin, googling, etc.), message them, set up a meeting, ask them about their business, and listen to what they have to say. It will either continue from there or it won't. Rinse and repeat. Ultimately, selling is networking and solving other people's problems. If you can do those two things, you'll get sales.
Problem solved, thanks!