skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I meant from the perspective of the fellow Republicans who appear to be turning on him, like Murdoch and the WSJ, using the lack of a red wave as part of their narrative.

I've been hoping that Trump destroys the Republican party since he announced his original run, so I may just be not wanting him to get kicked out too easily before he gets a chance to really mess up the next election for them.
You can just go put "PLC" into AliExpress and you will get a bunch of FX01 clones, or you could put "GX Developer" since all of these seem to be compatible.

Unfortunately GX Developer doesn't appear to be free, but apparently Delta makes PLCs too (with actual UL certs too) which sell for about 130 USD on AliExpress and the software appears to be free (unsure). They also have reasonably (~80$) priced HMI LCD touch screen displays.
I looked into this for a few minutes when a huge algae CO2 scrubber in am airport was discussed a few weeks back. The short is that it does close to nothing: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33173230

It's too bad because one of my weird dreams would be to have a vat of genetically modified algae in my house that removes CO2 and turns into some kind of Soylent.
> If it turns out that I misunderstand some aspect of compliance here, I’m happy as that is good news for me.

There is a vested interest amongst people that profit from users data to attack the GDPR and similar laws and spread FUD whenever possible.

It could be helpful to switch "user data" with "child labour" and see if your perspective changes.

The problem you likely have is while you don't exploit child labour, you are responsible for ensuring your supply chain doesn't either, and your supply chain may use the profits from that child labour to subsidise their product to you. A competitor which doesn't use child labour charges more, so you think "the cost of compliance is high", rather than "my profits are being subsidised by child labour"
The reason is because your government is reasonably well behaved. You can think of crypto as a hedge against bad government behavior. So in your case, you aren't a target customer.

Try thinking about people in Turkey or Venezuala, where the yearly inflation is 100% - 5,000%. Bitcoin looks like a relatively stable safe heaven in comparison.

https://www.coindesk.com/layer2/2022/10/25/turkey-cryptocurr...

In the US it was illegal to send dollars to Wikileaks. Is it really your money if you aren't allowed to send it to whoever you want?

Imagine instead of Wikileaks it was a political cause you truly believed in and wanted to support but your government didn't like. Surely you can see how they could label any money flowing to this cause as an "illicit transaction". Dn't you think that you should have the power to support whatever cause you believe is right? Or do you think that only your government should decide what are the approved political causes you are allowed to support?
Banking is largely globally networked as well, at least in the West.
Building a Clojure library for iOS with graalvm native-image
But Android itself is also threatened... (Unless maybe if you're running a Google-free version of AOSP ?)

Google is clearly a company that is in dire straits in the EU, both from its business model that relies so much on tracking people across the Internet, and from its ties to the US intelligence agencies.

As for the apps available on Google Play...

https://9to5google.com/2018/12/31/android-apps-facebook/

https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/some-popular-android-apps-a...
Ken Thompson's NFA regex patent (1971)
HN is a bit like Lake Woebegone where every child is above average
Only if you consider the web side.

Backend and frontend in the same language is a massive feature for many reasons, not least performance and uniformity. Adding TypeScript is increasing interface friction and complexity, instead of simplifying things.

Of course, right now this may or may not be easier/harder/feasible with just Nim depending on the project, and many more people know TypeScript, but the ideal of one language > many languages is a worthy one.
I pay for the credit card processing fee for the item part of the bill.

For example, if someone came in and bought coffee for $20 and left a $10 tip. My credit card fee is $0.66 (2.2% of the $20 which is $0.44 and 2.2% of the $10 which is $0.22). So out of the $10 tip the wait staff gets $9.78 ($10 - $0.22).
I actually really like the idea of not needing to rely on trust so much. Needing to rely on trust is a big problem that Bitcoin solves. There's no single Bitcoin Chair than can tweak the policy or supply of Bitcoin that you have to trust. No congress or president that can change the rules of the Bitcoin game that you have to trust. Bitcoin is impossible to forge, no trust that someone is handing you real money needed. There are no charge backs, payments are fully settled in minutes not days, you don't have to trust that you'll get paid and stay paid. No couriers, no middle men that you you have to trust to not steal your money in transit. If you want to prove to someone that you have the funds for something (like maybe FTX proving to customers they have the funds they said they did), you can sign a message with the private key of your wallet and everyone can verify that you have the funds in that wallet.

Many of the crypto scams that are out there are claiming their coin has these same properties when it doesn't and that's where people at getting burned by "crypto." Yes, regulations could reduce the risk of these frauds happening, but they won't eliminate it. Bitcoin eliminates the risk.
Nearly a decade ago (oh god) I converted some overdesigned five node ES mess to https://github.com/mchaput/whoosh. It's (obviously) not the fastest or anything, but it was more than good enough for low-dozens of GBs of mostly static data.
Sure, but that’s building a giant industry around the tech to make it explicitly NOT what it was designed to be, or what the ethos has been - secure, point to point electronic cash with no one telling you who you can transact with or what you can spend it on. Aka electronic cash.

No one needs a pile of paperwork to prove to the gov’t who they are to spend or get paid cash.

No one needs to be on a list, and have their every transaction double checked to make sure it’s with a validated counterparty to pay in or get paid cash.

Etc.

At that point, it’s literally cheaper, easier, and safer to just use a normal bank.

Which is I guess the point.
I want to say TikTok but it has text comments. Seems to me the friction in posting a video would deter comments, but the comments it deters might be the ones you didn't want.
That isn’t really a solution. The confusion is the inability for most people to discern the words decentralized and distributed, which is the primary fraud of crypto. Centralized finance already has distribution in place just for security and continuity of business, so blockchain doesn’t really provide anything new there.

The only enticing quality of blockchain to finance is just elimination of transaction fees on a more open ledger.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33153535
Some people think it's good to trade some of bitcoin's security for extra features, or at least, think that enough people will feel that way in the future to make these tokens good investments today.

Those people look particularly silly on days like this.
The constitution ascribes the right to keep and bear arms to "the People."

Constitutional protections to voting explicitly apply to "citizens." This is why American Samoans, non-citizen US Nationals born in the US, can own a gun but (usually) not vote in the mainland.

If voting applied to "people" instead of "citizens" then the ID would make no sense. It's pretty insane to compare determining if someone is a citizen to determining if they are a person.
Every time you borrow cash with an asset as collateral - a house loan, a car loan, an iPhone loan, a 401k loan, a margin loan - it could all be said to be a leveraged long in some sense.

Or would you say that you're against the idea of borrowing against stocks specifically?
I can transfer money for free and it gets instantaneously deposited in the other bank account. You list many things (middle man, bank's control) but don't list any reasons why these are bad. You also say it has potential, but don't provide any example such potential.

IMO there is one saving grace of cryptocurrencies, but ultimately this is also the reason why they simply won't be accepted: they are temporarily out of government control. This allows one to funnel funds in and out of hostile jurisdictions. This is a genuinely beneficial use case for people trapped in these jurisdictions. However, I'd argue this is such a vanishingly small portion of the mindshare and "business" conducted with and on behalf of the crypto industry, that it doesn't offer even a shred of redemption. The one altruistic use case is practically drowned out in the insane amount of buzzword laden echo chambers coming up with ever more hare brained structures and concepts to sell to each other. I wonder if these people even recognize how much of a caricature they have become.

I really connected the dots when I read some banker's messages to Elon Musk about how SBF was pitching some blockchain silliness for Twitter (as he would), and even Elon Musk, the master memer and troll, recognized how silly the idea was.
I suspect the feedback would only really be helpful for future interview performance, very different from on-the-job feedback. An interview is such a short and unnatural process that you're likely to see incorrect conclusions, skewed by the exact questions asked, time pressure, etc.

I'm very curious to hear anyone's experience reading their own interview feedback.
Love sublime, I work on python/django based project code base which is huge. Add to that the strain of multitudes of docker containers. And Chrome tabs. All of these eat up my RAM. I can easily use pycharm, but the speed and raw code feel of sublime is unbeatable.

Search and replace in multiple files.

Multiple cursors.

Ability to have N number of unsaved tabs

chef's kiss
It's almost like people who don't actually know anything about math, statistics, or probability shouldn't be believed when they make poor arguments using the same.

Maybe there's a reason it takes 4 years of extremely tough classes to understand the basics of "hard" math.
People forget that we won WWII thanks to a centrally planned economy
Why not both? A few years ago I saw a promising project focused around floating containers with algae and oysters that also provided valuable habitat for fish
Haskell was my favourite language for a decade. Now it’s Rust.

I’ve not spent anywhere as much time getting only moderately good at any other language as I have with Haskell.

> The “it teaches you to think a certain way” is IMO a really weak argument.

I disagree.

It has changed how I write in every other language. Haskell has many principles that are not enforced in other languages, but are good to follow.

I’ve learned a lot from reading open space Haskell code because it’s a language where authors care about the details.

> you’re far better off completely mastering Go, C++, Python

Probably! You could say you’re better off mastering any other language, but you have to define “better”. Certainly, you can get profitable faster with most other languages.

Ten years in, I still don’t know how to make a statically linked executable with Haskell.
Naw, it's been there since 10.0.0. Without a shortcut: use the text field in the "Help" menu.
So, Linkedin's blog and a bunch of people on twitter are saying that LinkedIn won this case, but I doesn't seem to be true? Nothing changed really. Scraping public data is still legal, scraping behind a logged-in account is still a grey area, hiQ is still dead.
I think Twitter has two big killer features:

- Get quick press releases (from the real press, but also from other sources)

- Be able to, let's call it politely, "interact" with politians and celebrities.

If too many celebrities leave feature 2 could be killed, it remains to be seen if increased openness in feature 1 would be enough to compensate.
Engineering is the easy part.

The political and regulatory issues are much harder.
Some sort of technical reasons seems most likely to me for now. They probably have some crazy denormalized/multi-level-cached storage where videos can be stored on different media or different locations. It's possible that "changing the query" requires some involved architecture changes in that system.

Why they weren't aware of this before adding the new feature is a different question.
It’s also important to wonder how much of the pollution is leaked fluids and burnt motor oil.

A while back I saw a video on youtube of someone mining road dust for platinum of all things.

Evs will be a likely improvement for the health of those near roads.
Gold mining purportedly does cause inflation in gold-backed currency. I guess bitcoin mining is the same, not familiar with that other than the annoying effect on hardware prices. Perhaps the argument is that this gets increasingly harder, as opposed to fiat money creation, which appears to be exponential growth. Plus manipulation of the currency has never been all that consistent, they are constantly trying new things and pushing boundaries. so any claims of future stability comes down solely to predicting how far some president or fed chairman might choose to go next along with how other countries react to that.
For the US, there may be historical cultural reasons as well. Some unions were actually run by mafias. These are the same kinds of groups that would go around neighborhoods asking for “protection” money. If you don’t pay, you don’t get protection from their henchmen ruining your store.
I wonder if that means we'll soon have cheap dongles to charge CCS cars at supercharger stations. I'd pay (maybe) $200 for such a thing, mostly because sometimes the CCS chargers are busy.
Looks at Apple.
elon himself is probably the only person who knows
Your distinction doesn't matter. They're talking about the plug/socket shape, which is shared between DC and AC standards.
Right, and like I say below, there are very rational and coherent explanations for how Mastodon works, but those explanations mean nothing to the average user, many of whom will not complete sign up because it is so radically different than what they are accustomed to 99.9% of the time when signing up for a new website they heard about (like Twitter for example).
Chipmaker GlobalFoundries to Start Job Cuts and Freeze Hiring
A discussion involving swung time and J Dilla needs a Chris "Daddy" Dave mention, too. That dude is in a different universe from the rest of us when it comes to time.
This is a nice collision of capitalist illogic. In pursuit of profit a free feature became paid, making the feature worse than useless and hurting a separate corporation who took free medicine and made it paid, hurting thousands and thousands of poor, sick people.

A hugely entertaining week of the internet, so far.
This is a real thing. Pleroma's reputation on the #fediblock tag is largely "oh god it's another Pleroma with five anime girls who love to nazipost, you know what to do".

Mastodon admins don't see the Pleromas like yours. All we see is the problem ones. Yesterday I saw someone running a single-user Masto who was sharing a bit of code they knocked together to auto-defederate every Pleroma their Masto saw. They said they were fine with losing the obviously vanishingly-small number of non-nazi Pleromas.

I agree that this is fucked up. But this is the reputation Pleroma has among Masto admins. I don't know what Pleroma can do to change this, assuming they want to.
Mythbusters and Alton Brown teamed up in 2012 to try cooking a thanksgiving dinner with a car:

https://youtu.be/tqABijWMlxA

Alton Brown was recently asked about this and replied simply: "inedible", but Adam Savage also recently discussed it and said it was cold by the time they got to it, due to "the vagaries of television" but quite edible:

https://youtu.be/Dd5pb_mzk14
>You seem to overlook the fact that Europe became dependent on Russian Energy against the wishes of the US.

And you seem to overlook the fact that US has been continuously interfering in European politics to force Europe to stop using Russian energy against its interests. Now, US has finally accomplished that.

>You also seem to have selected an unrepresentative set of scare headlines.

The articles I linked are very much representative, and talk about large scale systemic problems Europe is experiencing due to lack of available energy.

>Gas prices are in fact plunging in Europe, and the winter is turning out to be unexpectedly mild.

Now there's an example of an unrepresentative headline. The context there was that gas prices dropped because there aren't enough LNG terminals in Europe to unload the gas. It's not for lack of demand. Thanks for once again confirming you don't understand the subject you're opining on.

>You also may not be aware that in the 1940’s Europe experienced war on their own territory. I am surprised you haven’t considered that they have their own reasons for wanting to disassociate themselves from Putin’s state.

That's a nonsensical statement. Creating tensions with Russia does not help Europe in any way. The way to avoid conflict is by creating economic ties and a mutually beneficial relationship. The only country that does not benefit from that is the US.

>They are either a vassal of the US, or they are not. Clearly, since they only do what the US wants when it suits them, there is no serious argument to be made that they are a vassal.

That's not how the real world works child.
He didn't have an exit plan because, like every gambler, he was sure his "system" was better than anything that came before and couldn't possibly go tits up.

Like every gambler, he was wrong of course, and eventually lost it all because gambling is stupid.
You seem to be confusing "is a good business to invest in" into the discussion of "is reasonably safe to use".
Not sure why it would be discouraged because of big little. Pinning to a big or pinning to a little is still a potentially useful thing.
NYC second avenue subway is worse by far. CA almost looks reasonable
It doesn’t apply. Crypto investors wanted to be free of pesky regulation, remember.
Interesting! I'd never touched a Catamount/SUNMOS system; didn't know that static everything was an option there, although some of my friends did work on those. Do you suppose the friction was due to it not being how their local workstation/previous system worked?
The informal lists that people share are not equivalent to angry crowds with pitchforks.

They are actually circulated among victims and their friends, with a lot of validation of repeat offenders. So there is a lot of informal collective information gathering and confirmation.

They are lists of men to avoid dating or not trust them to buy you a drink.

And the lists are a reaction to the difficulty of holding them accountable. Universities have been bad about punishing their students for criminal behaviour, because they want their tuition, don't want to offend their wealthy alumni parents, and have a misguided fear of ruining the lives of relatively young people (even if they are legally adults).

Unfortunately some of the people who get away with abusing their fellow students will go on abusing their colleagues the rest of their lives.

So if you want to keep people from being unfairly put on these anonymous lists, then you need to make these lists unnecessary.
Have to applaud the author on their naming game. GURQ is definitely one of the best worst acronyms.
No, that's why they said it is the "right of the militia to keep and bear arms."

If they wanted it to apply to people, unconnected to the militia they would have said "the right of the People to keep and bear arms."

Wait...
My thoughts as well, this is their business advantage to lose.

> NACS is the most common charging standard in North America: NACS vehicles outnumber CCS two-to-one, and Tesla's Supercharging network has 60% more NACS posts than all the CCS-equipped networks combined.

Yet, in your link it's complained about that the Supercharging network capacity is already strained. Bottom line is that the vast majority of the charging stations that will exist 10 years from now are still yet to be built.

Tesla may still be hoping for a regional break, as their standard wins in some geographies but not for others. This would be a loss for all of us all collectively.

Certainly feels like they should have known better. Past greed will leave them (and their customers) with a massive writeoff in the future if your prediction comes to pass.
There are some useful distinctions to be made. Insurance, for example, could be seen as "negative leverage", but it really is a different kind of animal.
If my passport says my name is the same as a famous person then should I still be verified? This whole anyone can be verified for $8 a month had zero chance at success.
Horses and camels were being used for wars for centuries and they were occasionally killed in action, it is not disgusting at all if you think of it objectively
The smell of baking bread (2020)
If the police are so disinterested in evidentiary leads residing in citizens' iPhones, then perhaps they can cease their efforts to hack into them and to persuade governments to mandate backdoors for their use.
>> You cannot use the word you're defining inside the definition of it.

Reasoning to me is a belief, as such, it’s possible to be loyal or for that matter, non-loyal to reasoning. For example, beliefs of religious fundamentalists in my opinion are based on the word of god, not reasoning. Further, even when it would be easier to bend my reasoning to fit narrative that’s better for myself, I strive to reason objectively regardless of its impact on myself. To me, that’s loyalty that’s not born of force, manipulative tactics, and is a valid example of loyalty without error. In the not to distant past, people were killed for their belief in reasoning over the word of god, even today it still happens.

>> That the cheating is a reflection of the self selecting population that trends towards joining the military rather than the military (the institution) doing anything to encourage that behavior.

Taken to an extreme, top level military personnel cheating is potentially national security threat and even at enlisted level, systemic amounts of adultery, given it’s a crime under UCMJ, create an environment that’s only likely to produce similar illegal behavior and culture of covertly enabling it.

As I said in my original comment, in my experience these issues are common among all militaries, and I am not aware of a solution. That said, in my opinion, it is an issue, like the increased levels of suicide within military that if addressed would have a significant impact on a military being more fit for combat that those who have been unable to address these issues.
Sure. The problem I’ve seen is there is zero value add (and significant costs and value loss) when that happens over a normal bank.
> I'd prefer my car not be "killed off".

> trashed

This level of hyperbole makes it hard to take you seriously.

Even if it was true, I think that would mean you're advocating for all the Teslas to be killed off, which I think would mean you're more wrong than they are!
There aren't many compliant exchanges operating in the US, though; Coinbase seriously even raised their fees a couple years ago because they thought they could do so, even while other exchanges are trying to lower them: they aren't merely competing on fees.