skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I've been on at least one team effort like that (not as the architect, in my defense--in fact, it was that failure and my somewhat frustrated ask to my manager to give me a couple of weeks head down to start it properly that launched the automation lead portion of my career).

I bet a team like that would be totally transformed by getting some early success under their belts, and giving valuable feedback early enough to actually be included in the whole process.

That's exactly what a QA team can use these tools for, especially early on--it can accelerate manual testing if nothing else, by people record-replaying at their desk for repeatability. Even if that won't work for verification, sometimes just recording the script that does all the setup you have to do for every test gets you really far--then you just take over manually from there.

In general, I think QA's sometimes-bad rap comes from putting in maximal effort and cost, in trade for a very limited and usually unquantifiable increase in actual quality confidence, and that usually comes down to dogma. Most of the "traditional" ways of doing QA come down to writing maximum docs without any single point of truth (and therefore become maintenance hogs and/or wrong) then spending a million bucks or more a year on a team whose whole job is to tell you 99 times out of 100 that things look the same as yesterday.

It makes the sector a thankless grind from the inside, and makes it an expensive spreadsheet generator that sometimes blocks your releases for unclear reasons from the outside. Fun times.
Having worked on my share of kitchen-sink SAAS I'd say it's hard to cut back on features when table stakes are always raising. Clients often want a buffet of different things.

If you over specialize there isn't much moat. Which is fine for small shops. Though it does limit market size and growth potential.

Which isn't to say don't trim the fat. Just measure twice before cutting.
USB adapter claims to quadruple M2 and M1 Mac monitor support
Similar here, I've been using Arc for a couple of weeks and I'm pretty happy with it. I really enjoy the way it handles tabs, spaces and profiles.

Personally, I use 1Password for passwords & credit cards, and Raindrops.io for bookmarks, so jumping between browsers were fairly smooth for me.
Nobody is going to be rich forever, because nobody is going to live forever. You have a very hard time limit to spend your coins.
Please elaborate, how is it a negative sum game?
SE 3rd Gen has 4GiB RAM, therefore the app defaults to 384x384 size. This is about 1/2 computation of your normal run (512x512) and the original version uses PLMS sampler, which defaults to 50 steps, while this one uses the newer DPM++ 2M Karras sampler, that defaults to 30 steps. All in all, your M1 Pro MBP is still 4x of your SE 3rd Gen in raw performance (although my implementation should be faster than PyTorch at about 2x on M1 chips)
Gambling with customers' funds works great for you when you win, and bad for your customers when you lose.
I never saw a web directory that took a serious approach to using automation to curate the directory. It's probably more feasible than people think because it's a matter of classifying links up or down (relevant or not) which is a much more ontologically and mathematically tractable problem than learning a ranking function or trying to classify things into one of N>2 categories.

I think the problem may more have been the lack of a sustainable revenue model. Getting volunteers to curate the directory is particularly destructive because the people who most want to volunteer either (1) want to promote something or (2) want to get paid so somebody else can promote something.
If buyer and seller are both willing to hold value in bitcoin, you can just do the math and send that amount with a thin client - super simple.

If either party wants to hedge their exposure to bitcoin volatility, it gets more complicated.
I don't think that's true. We were imagining them, and even trying to build them -- the hardware just wasn't capable of it. Newton, Palm and Handspring showed us the way, and those platforms died on the journey there. Apple arguably only added capacitive multitouch to the mix, apparently the last big piece of the puzzle to make mobile devices natural and fluid (OK, wireless networks weren't quite there when the original iPhone came out).

I'd argue that there are many, many puzzle pieces still needed to begin imagining an AR future. While the Newton showed an incomplete vision of its future, it begged all the right questions. My kids Occulus Quest, on the other hand, just makes me feel motion sick...
It was pretty widely publicized before it happened, and I think it even got delayed a few days, during the business day. Honestly, I can't imagine it will ever be used for reals[1], but testing it once seems reasonable.

[1] few disasters, man made or natural, reach national scope. Even a grid failure would likely only reach half the country, but do you need a national alert for that? What useful content could it have?

Many inbound nukes is about all I could see it used for, but I expect that would cause more panic and be less useful than not sending a message... And I'm not convinced a decision to send a message would be made in a reasonable amount of time. State or local messaging seems more likely.
1. OK, it does seem to work in Firefox.

2. OK, I guess you can (almost) print it.

However:

3. PDF is not a proprietary format. It’s actually a real standard, ISO 32000.

4. You completely ignored my main point, which was about graceful fallback rendering and semantic markup. Honestly, All-SVG websites seems like the XSL Formatting Objects fiasco all over again.
Ask HN: Why RAM, rechargable alkaline manganese battery simplly not available
Why RAM, rechargable alkaline manganese, battery not practical, ie. simply not available in market

otherwise it's far so more useful as it is nominal 1.5V
Strong disagree. I loved Apple’s styles in this era before everything went Snow and Titanium. Those old CRT iMacs are just so great.
Me too. I made an alias that was _shorter_ than --force to make it easier to type (and hence more likely for me to use by default).
Ofcourse we can - that's what a hydrogen bomb does!

The Teller–Ulam design and the NIF do the exact same job - they heat up and compress hydrogen to trigger fusion. Its just that NIF and has to fuck around with lazers that are perfectly focused on tiny gold pellets with micrograms of hydrogen. The hydrogen bomb deals with literal tons of material at once.

If you dont care about safety and environment, you concrete over one of the great lakes, heat them up by exploding thermonuclear bombs and use the steam to generate elctricity.
Someone who is upset enough about being being called out for using gendered language that they post a complaint about the interaction, on hacker news, I would bet real money that the OP is a straight male.

I would also bet that the straight male would say "no" to the question "do you fuck guys?"
Was Elon so naive as to think he could announce he's voting Republican and not face the consequences?
You can use wsl-gvproxy(*), which uses our CRC usermode network stack to allow use with VPN. We are working on making this an option for podman machine. Alternatively, or to test, you can use CRC from our crc-org project and run the podman preset. This uses a dedicated VM using native hypervisors and the gvproxy setup.

I am the teamlead of CRC and work on the Windows enablement of podman machine, with the podman desktop team. Gladly take questions here or by email.

(*) also known as wsl-vpnkit
Oh, right, I see. They do work. It was not obvious that you have to hold down the button.
The article says 4 months of severance (+2wks/yrs worked) is being paid and medical is covered for 6mo.
The line from towards the end -

> The classic Cindarella story: An artist from no where that looks at others doing a thing and says "Alright, why them, why not me?"

And threads of collaboration, trust, starting small, just having a go. It's a classic startup story, too.
Everything in hooks is explicit. Which is a blessing and a curse.

Classes were really easy to compose and automatically easily bring everything you needed into the class. This did lead to some situations where you could over-engineer and get yourself into a bind. You can technically do the same/similar thing with hooks, it just requires a bit more code. Lack of setup/tear down with hooks also means you need to rely on nonces more often.

In general, hooks have a bunch of small, reactive-programming tricks that you learn with experience.
Having charges be very difficult to reverse is a protection to the user. Treat it like cash which you don’t need to carry a wallet around for.
I've never even heard of FTX and I've been in the crypto space for many years. Binance however was always near the top since it came out. There was one american exchange that used to be nr.1 but became irrelevant after they weren't allowed to serve non-americans anymore. I can't remember the name and it isn't in the top 300 anymore, maybe they had to shut down.

EDIT: I just checked and FTX was only founded 3 years ago
Jeez that’s shameful. What kind of capital management system lets crypto within 100 miles of a pension plan.
He meant that the price of BTC expressed in USD should be going up with inflation.
works really well thank you!
FTA: this is the TL;DR and there's a lot of truth in it.

Given the cost of maintaining everything we build, it would
literally be better for us to do 10% the work and sit around
doing nothing for the rest of our time, if we could figure
out the right 10% to work on.
CPUs have documentation, for this. I forget which one, but the one I did read it was as simple as the true case is assumed more common, and it is easy to arrange logic around that (I probably mis remember, but close enough to that). The common case also should be near the if in memory (inline code), so it is likely on the same cache line (or the next which is prefetched), while the other case is farther away and so you can stall the cache if the if goes that way.
I've been recommending making a git tag before rebasing. eg:

git tag -f pre-rebase
Depends heavily on where you’re from. My aunts refer to each other as guys all the time. It’s equivalent to ‘folks’ in the way they use it.
That's the attitude that allowed Prohibition to happen. Weird virtue signaling over something very few people actually wanted allowed people to gain political clout, but then it all backfired and we accidentally got the thing.
Highly recommend asking them for help with chores when they come knocking.
Well, yes, but it creates those when you log in. The proxy fixes some corp firewall issues (see other comments here). Start up is faster overall for me versus the normal backend.
Downloading a wallet takes a few seconds. You dont need to download a ledger to pay.
I've worked with a crypto trading firm before, one of FTX's otc clients. In that industry we hire based on referrals and rarely on credentials. A trustworthy person who earns the company $0 is worth more than an unvetted one that could stab the company in the back anytime in the future.
I don't understand why people are so sensitive these days!

Just don't use "guys" and move on. Easy.
No; the bank won't do anything because the transaction isn't unauthorized which is the operative word in the law.
Agree, however we are already in trap of algorithms. Look how few years of using social networks spread ideologies that would be laughable back then, ie "there is more than two genders" or "earth is flat".
Ask HN: Do you genuinely enjoy your developer job?
What do you do for work, how did you get hired?
I pay for YouTube too. Between that and Kagi search, it's ~$20 per month. Which seems crazy in today's environment of 'everything free'. But seriously, I use these both all day for both work and play, but I only watch an hour of Netflix a day. So which is really more valuable?

I agree that on the whole, people will continue to go for the free option, but I'm just glad that some options are appearing to pay, which rebalances the incentives a bit.
Spot on. The clue it’s not about evolution is that you don’t “trim” fat from a live animal.
Year ago I had a realization. I make solid money. My spare time is very limited. Why am I spending hours trying to save 20 dollars.
We have used Cypress for 3 years to test our oss project: https://apisix.apache.org/blog/2021/02/08/stable-product-del...
Also missing are macOS Monterey and Big Sur: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201222
Comparing Apple Maps and Google Maps, I don't have much hope of this working out the way you imagine it.
Yes, it is absolutely a thing. Such squatters capitalize on people who registered a domain name, but didn't finish the process of bringing up a site (or a parking site, etc.).

Here's another example: Let's say you have an old domain (abc.example.com) that you used to host on GitHub Pages. Time goes by, and you decide to retire the site: You unconfigure the GitHub Pages configuration, so going to abc.example.com gives a GitHub 404 error, but you don't remove the relevant DNS records.

In this example, some time later, a person might come by, notice that you have abc.example.com pointing to GitHub Pages, but not have a GitHub Pages site. That person can then spin up their own GitHub repo, and squat on your domain.

In this example, you can reclaim ownership of your GitHub Pages by contacting GitHub Support: They would likely ask you to put a TXT record in your DNS, as proof of ownership. As for Digital Ocean, I'm not sure what they'll do.

But indeed, yes, this sort of squatting is a thing.
Shouldn't you be posing the same question to yourself though? Why do you want or need to push your comfort zone?
there is a difference between mindlessly trolling a group/community (spamming, DoS and DDoS, flashmobs, 14 year olds standing across some building on the street and looking "menacing", etc) and harassing and threatening one or more specific people (voice messages, stalking, doxing). we already have legislation about the latter, it's simply not enforced.

and there are no real conventions about what sites should do when a) one of their members is a target from the outside, b) harassers use their site as an accessory (eg. to communicate, organize, store photos/videos, advertise, recruit)

and obviously it's not a clear-cut issue. mandating sites to somehow filter out harmful messages is not trivial. at the same time it'd be great to provide a few independent clearinghouses for these, it'd be great if users could opt-in to have content aimed at them filtered, etc. (for example it'd be very useful for sites to have a setting for users to only allow receiving private messages from users with some minimal reputation, and so on)
>That's one of the most overused tropes in fiction.

Huh? How is that overused? I've only seen it in "Contact", except, unfortunately, the project was saved by the government having enough foresight to build a 2nd, identical and secret machine in Hokkaido, Japan, though I did think that plot point made a good statement about religious nuttery in America (which really isn't a problem here in Japan).

>It'd be much more surprising and inventive to do a story where they do come together and work hard only to fail due to running up against the laws of physics.

I hate those kinds of stories, and this has been seen in sci-fi before too. The whole story is just pointless because it was a no-win scenario from the start, so there's no lesson at all, other than "what's the point of even trying?".

I like my story idea because it makes a good statement about how dangerous and destructive religion is.

>If you want to send a message it would be more productive to harp on the fact that better astronomical programs may have spotted the danger sooner and allowed for other solutions.

That kind of plot won't make for a good story.

>Narratives where everybody dies in the end were gimmicky to begin with and are just becoming tired and depressing now.

I honestly have no idea what you're talking about here: narrative where everybody dies are not even remotely commonplace in popular fiction. Even Game of Thrones has a happy ending of sorts, though lots of people die along the way. You must be watching or reading some kind of fiction I'm unaware of.
Never read this before, interesting view. I am pretty happy that Unity doesn’t have Meta prefix and can be used to create unified multi-platform XR experiences.
Care to substantiate your claim with examples other than the usual, now-old coreutils, binutils, etc.?
I keep this poem on my bookmarks bar to occasionally read. Take from it what you will but I think it's beautiful and full of wisdom. Hope it will help.

http://mwkworks.com/desiderata.html
This time it might play out differently, just because the real economy is tanking (or it will in 2023) and the supply of real money towards crypto purchases will dwindle to nothing.
Invested in real estate and made enough to be debt free instead, pulled out just in time. Not rich, but not bad. May even be a good time to buy crypto but each time i say "now is the time" it goes down. So there's clearly a batch of signals i am reading wrong.
The universe is doomed to death by entropy, only life can reverse entropy.

Genesis 1:28 is your purpose; "Be fruitful and multiply"

It's best to implement that with another person who shares your purpose and helps enable the objects of your purpose to implement theirs.

Everything else you do are trade-offs to making the implementation of your purpose as enjoyable as possible for you and your partner.
They will probably pay you less than what you can get in other divisions. Nobody I know chose to work for Apple for the total compensation.
>If those links are the best you can do, then I stand by my claims.

That's all you have: empty vapid rhetoric, no evidence, no arguments, just shallow childish claims.

"Noam Chomsky: Israel’s Actions in Palestine are “Much Worse Than Apartheid” in South Africa" (https://www.democracynow.org/2014/8/8/noam_chomsky_what_isra...)

But what would the world renowned jewish Professor Noam Chomsky know am I right? We have eloff here who will just state his baseless opinion and that's much more worth than the actual evidence, right?/s Kinder-garden hour with eloff, so much fun, such intellectually stimulating arguments you have /s.

>Actively trying to kill non combat civilians for the purpose of inciting fear to achieve political ends is terrorism.

Finally, you admitted that Israel is committing acts of terrorism, the sanity prevails.

>What Israel does is horrible, but it's not terrorism. What Hamas does is also horrible, and it is terrorism.

There is the insanity again, your argument basically boils down to: I am pro Israel therefore their acts of terrorism are merely "horrible", but not terrorism because that would make Israel look horrible. Israel's colonized victim's on the other hand who do similar actions are always committing terrorism, because eloff said so, no evidence or explanation required, just trust eloff.

>You can't just change the meanings of words when you like.

Peak projection, anyone with an atom's weight of honesty can verify.
Reminds me of my coworker who used to come in every day and greet our all-male office with "morning ladies!"

This soon stopped just before our first female colleague joined. Our boss pulled us all in to a meeting to inform us that we now have to use gender-neutral terms like "folks" and "peeps", and there was to be no more joking around gendered forms of address. What a spoilsport.
Haha, true! On the other hand, is that better or worse than running into a string of "wip" commits that had the code in a broken state.
Use proxy.webflow.com for your cname if you face a redirect loop (though I’m thinking that’s not your problem after re-reading it)

Can you cache the requests more aggressively?
By government you mean a handful of legislators.

The public has been treating their Senators and Representatives like celebrities.

Electoral turnovers flush corruption; we really need to stop being ruled by pudding brains with no skin in the future game who LARP concern while doing nothing but living easy: https://www.nber.org/papers/w29766
I think you're confused about the premise of this discussion. The comparison is not between Maxwell's equations and lambda calculus, it's between lambda calculus and other theoretical constructs in CS.

Maxwell's equations are "the Maxwell's equations" of physics because they are "the most successful" physical theory: i.e., incredible accuracy, wide applicability, and concision. This is relative to other physical theories. (I guess you could debate whether this is actually the case---obviously this is all subjective, and not everyone agrees. Maybe someone thinks Einstein's field equations should really be "the Maxwell's equations" of physics.)

To say that the lambda calculus or anything else are "the Maxwell's equations" of computer science is to say that they have the same set of properties relative to other let's theoretical constructs in computer science. But is this actually the case? It seems like Turing machines, lambda calculus, etc. are all similar in terms of relative modeling utility and concision. I disagree that they are widely applicable---in practice, just about any commonly used programming language is far more widely applicable than anything of these. And as you pointed out, by Turing universality, they're all logically equivalent---so the question of difference in modeling "power" is not relevant here.

I guess I just don't think it makes much sense to talk about anything in CS being "the Maxwell's equations" of CS. In physics, a wide variety of disparate physical phenomena are being modeled, with individual models having a quite varied range of power and applicability. In CS, things are much different.

Incidentally, even if you simulate Maxwell's equations on a computer using Lisp, a Turing machine, or whatever else, you will not go far if you insist on algebraically exact computations. :-) As you say yourself, you must integrate them numerically, which means numerical error introduced through your discretization. But I honestly can't say I understand your point including this information above.
CFPB is one of the few departments in government that are actually incredibly functional. Probably one of the best things to come out of American governance in a long time
> People who constantly make this argument don't actually understand how economics and monetary value actually work.

People who make your argument usually don't understand that monetary theory hasn't caught up to accommodating cryptocurrency because most of the ideas are decades old.

USD is not based on GDP. Its value can only loosely be attributed to it.
Can't, except as you note. Best trade your fiat for something actually auditable through cryptographic means ASAP. :)

(for a less quippy answer: they could show their fiat liabilities through these means and have a third party bank attest to their fiat account assets (or an encryption of their fiat assets). At least then you'd be trusting some established bank and not just some sketchy cryptocurrency industry company)
That's not a psychological experiment - it's barely even an experiment. If someone chooses one over the other, what have they learnt? Are they controlling or even measuring any other variables? It's also not non-consensual. If you go to a store you expect to have options of things to buy - that's the entire point of a store. It's not even an A/B test! Everyone sees both options and makes an informed choice.
>Banks are responsible for knowing their customers.

What do you think that means?
The latest version of podman is always available at https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/rhcontainerbot/podma...

sudo dnf copr enable rhcontainerbot/podman-next -y

sudo dnf install podman

However the versions provided by the distro have gone through more tests. We are still improving this part as ideally you should be able to pick a version
You are paying them to protect you and the entire world from unimaginable evil.