skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Makes sense. Stuff like the clamshell device is a more practical innovation than a clunky and slow anthropomorphic robot arm flipping a burger.

We don’t fly aircraft like ornithopters, but with ducted fans and propellers.
If I read the article correctly, it should be: '[...] that could replace rare earth magnets with nickel and iron.'

This is a call to funding type of article promising one of those many right-around-the-corner technical revolutions that might never happen.
You can enable content security policy then hash all the javascripts and assets so only prebuilt and hashed stuff is allowed to be loaded in the web browser. There is no way to easily check that some one you trust did the hashing, but it is doable with an extension in the web browser.
Legally, treat the bicycle as you would a tractor. Slow down to their speed, give them plenty of space, and wait until it is safe to pass.

And when you get home, advocate for better cycling routes in your area.
Naively I would assume the closest you can get to an impulse function, aka a Dirac delta function, because it contains all frequencies at once. So, as loud and short of a sound as possible. This should give you the most information about your surroundings from listening to the echo, because different frequencies can reflect differently in a room. Also because mathematically an impulse convolved with a function returns the function, so an impulse gives you the most neutral echo with which to compare.
Yeah, there could be a communication gap here. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you're talking about truly excessive situations.

The mild versions of the patterns you're objecting to don't seem problematic.

As someone who's problem might be unfixable, sometimes I just need a sounding board and don't expect actionable advice. And sometimes people just want to vent, but I try to save that for my therapist.
I mean from 24 to 10 is a big difference.
Please don't call Orphx EDM. They make techno and ambient.

Slightly related: Saw them at Labyrinth 2015 in Japan. Amazing performance.
This is like the successor to flash.
People are not equal in (sub-(sub-))domain experience. And we all can be distracted or dumb sometimes. Consider how powerful rubber ducking is : it works even when you're not talking to another person ! (And you might not think about doing it in a stressful situation.)

It just needs to be done tactfully. And in case it was a stupid mistake, defuse the ego issues by telling an anecdote about how you've made a similar one. (It's even helpful if it was a dangerous mistake : telling how you got punished, but the world didn't end.)
We are talking about the end of life (in terms of no longer receiving macOS updates) here, right? That timeframe is much longer than two years.
I'll also add that the anger of motorists towards cyclists rolling through stop signs is completely irrational when you take into consideration that approximately 100% of motorists also run through almost all stop signs, so long as they aren't blocked by an other car.

This twitter video exemplifies it pretty well https://twitter.com/toddnickel/status/1560358628707618816

We just take for granted that cars will blast through stop signs at a pretty high speed (maybe 10 - 20 km/h?). But when we see a cyclist do it, for some reason there seems to be some sort of optical or logical illusion that makes it stick out to us more. If you look at the speed these cars are going at, a lot of them are probably actually going at around the full cruising speed of a casual cyclist. So, considering most cyclists would actually slow down somewhat to roll through a stop sign, they're probably actually going faster.

Oh the Urbanity! Recently had a great episode on this as well https://youtu.be/HT_KdFCVEdc
Achieving mouse-level evasion performance using real-time computational planning
> As an example, Java is unusable for any project that requires high speed processing or highly accurate timing.

That is absolutely false. There is a huge list of already existing high-performance projects written in Java, used from HFT to distributed computations. Code using primitives (and thus actually comparing apples to apples) JIT compile down to just as efficient and performant code as what you would get with C. Applications reliant on dynamic allocations may very well come out ahead low-level languages due to its killer GCs vs mallocing left and right. (And no, not everything is replaceable with strict nested lifetimes a la Rust, and (atomic) reference counting is slow as hell. Nor is everything replaceable with arenas).

> Also, there's a HUGE overhead that comes from wiring together and maintaining the runtime environment

Do you even talk about Java? You literally just download a jdk and run the program. That works for 90% of the time (you can literally download 20 years old jars from some long-dead university professor’s website and it will just work). There are minor nits, but if you use the same jdk version it was meant to be used with it is literally dirt-easy. I don’t see how dynamic libs dependency hell is any easier to manage.
ClickHouse removes its own code from memory and switches to using HugePages
The article also says:

> The average age of people who founded the highest growth startups (i.e. the startups in the top 1% by growth) is 45.

So contrary to your intuition (and mine!), the average high growth startup founder, at 45, is older, not younger, than the average "startup" founder, at 42.
I read an interview with Australian wire music composer Alan Lamb that a stringed instrument with multiple overtones vibrating on the string can be analyzed by breaking down the vibration into eigenvalues, but I've never found any reference material that explain that. I'm wondering if he was referring to FFT.
Global Lecture with Ed Catmull [video]
L1 bandwidth is very intimately tied to the core (it's really more proper to talk about the bandwidth of the memory pipes instead of L1), so that's not changing on a small revision.
Docker itself is trying to expand into wasm applications: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33320530
I read about this in the Garbage Collection Handbook [1], which is an excellent overview of the entire field (at least up to ~2016), which discusses the distinction at large. I don't have it on me to quote, but a very clear distinction is made between "live objects" and "reachable objects", with reachabillity acting as a computable proxy for the uncomputable property of liveness. Liveness is defined as "this object will be used again by the program in some way", and a memory leak is defined as "failing to free an object that is no longer live". An unreachable object can't be live, but there are many ways of having a reachable object that is not live.

To prove that this is used in the literature at large, here is the abstract of a random GC paper I found [0]:

> Functional languages manage heap data through garbage collection. Since static analysis of heap data is difficult, garbage collectors conservatively approximate the liveness of heap objects by reachability i.e. every object that is reachable from the root set is considered live. Consequently, a large amount of memory that is reachable but not used further during execution is left uncollected by the collector.

[0] https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3381898.3397208

[1] https://www.google.com/books/edition/_/TKOfDQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gb... (you may try to search for live/reachable/leak to get some idea here as well)
> Every one of these exchanges has every incentive to operate against the user's wishes, at the end of the day.

It's not that simple. Operate enough against the user's and you'll find yourself indicted. Not being regulated doesn't mean it's a free for all and you can just take the money.
obviously the actual weight matters, but on average this advice is poor.

Across the spectrum of over weight people (from mildly to extremely obese) there are a range of health markers from blood pressure, HDL/LDL/Triglycerides, insulin sensitivity, leptin/ghrelin, sex hormones (and PE/ED), blood sugar, cortisol, inflammation, arterial calcification (on and on the list goes) that are all positively improved by returning to healthy "normal" (not average) weights.

Layne Norton's book "Fat Loss forever" and youtube channel are excellent resources to begin understanding.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUxVCtScf8U

https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/43596925-fat-loss-for...
My opinion is that the only reason of why governments don't do these is that there is no way to transmit signals from those points. I'm pretty sure that some street lamps do exactly this.
Musk is steppin' and fetchin' like his head is on fire and his ass is catchin'.

In other words, he's desperately throwing everything imaginable against the wall to see what (if anything) actually sticks.
The reality is that we need to not use plastic, but that is going to be such a hard transition.

I support making companies responsible for plastic waste and at least to produce it in a way that increases likelihood of recycling. As the article explains, there are thousands of plastics and they can’t be melted together for reuse, so the cost to sort and recycle is prohibitive. That’s a problem we can solve with regulation.

I’d really be interested to know what materials are out there that we can invest in to supplant plastics.
There really aren't any special rules for motorcyclists pertaining to lane splitting and filtering in the US in most states. The general rule most states have for roads with marked lanes is that drivers of vehicles keep their vehicle within a single lane as practicable and that they don't move out of that lane until they have determined that it's safe to do so. This is the law that's used against motorcyclists who lane split or filter to pass traffic. Interestingly enough, it's not used against motorists who lane split to pass pedalcyclists.
F for Fake by Orson Welles is in the same vein. Still don't know if it's a fiction or non-fiction.
I'm torn on this article. To start I think this is good advice, but I'm not sure it is the __best__ advice to help the people it proclaims to help. I'm actually not sure it even targets the right side of the issue.

The article is likely good advice for those looking to improve the gentleness of their communication skills, but ultimately this will only be a small portion of the people that care enough to improve their communication skills and put these learnings into practice. This still leaves the majority of ones communication open to the use of this word out of ignorance to the issue.

Instead I'd like to encourage those who feel resentment or anger over the use of this word to recognize it for what it more likely is. A mistake on the part of the speaker. An artifact of speech they picked up along the way. Generally just ignorance, nothing personal.

I apply this advice myself in many areas of my life. You can't change everyone, but you can change yourself. So make yourself more resilient where you can.

I'm not exactly sure why I bothered to type all this up, other than I have a feeling there is another perspective here that will reach more people and help those struggling other than trying to correct the speech of the masses. Of course it's never quite that black and white, it's probably a little bit of both.
Git has plenty of open source GUIs that would help.
90% of the stupid stuff that Elon has done (that we know about) comes from his interactions on the toxic social media platform, Twitter. He’d be better off deleting his Twitter account and moving to Mastodon. Or just off social media altogether.
I like how it enables package search right in IDE. I'd be interested to integrate Packj [1]. Sent you an email.

1. https://github.com/ossillate-inc/packj
A Reader Mode Proxy for the Slow Web Written in Rust
I can't say this news/prospect makes me sad...
I played competitive SC:BW and WC3 and when thinking about building placement and base design you always take in consideration paths of invasion to block weak points, e.g.: access to your workers gathering resources should be blocked as much as possible; create choke points inside the base to use as killing zones; use choke points to break enemy units' path finding; block off ramps with supply buildings to block vision and place a turret with range on the border of the killing zone on the ramp; keep a turret to defend against air drops or flying units coming for your workers.
I think your comment is wrong and perhaps speaks to your own visual senses than any factual effect.

There’s been so many advancements in the last ten years outside of raytracing. Better character motion, better character AI, spatial audio, audio materials, speech matching just off the top of my head.

Every single thing about games has gotten noticeably better for realism.

One only needs to watch a Digital Foundry video or a GDC talk to see the big uplifts.

10 years is a long time too and spans all the way back to the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 era. So your comment is nonsensical at best
Well, of course. “$24 per month seems high for running my own personal instance that’s going to do a handful of notifications daily” vs “$24 per month seems high for running a public service that could very easily need to be scaled up quickly” are two very different statements.
> The UK has been working towards this (with roundabouts too)

As far as the USA goes:

Absurdly, roundabouts in California (a relatively recent import, starting about 20 years ago) always have stop signs! In fact in Palo Alto there is precisely one roundabout with yields on all entrances. Makes me wonder why they bothered.

Roundabouts (called "rotaries" there) are common in Massachusetts and don't have stop signs. Not that it would matter much as traffic signs and other rules are optional and not enforced there.
Using Wi-FI to See Through Walls
Still, even in real life, giving unsolicited advice never works in my opinion. It's basically as useless as complaining about something and thinking it will magically change without doing anything different.

Note I have seen the following be useful:

1. Is the person really just saying "I want a hug" with their complaining? If so, and you care about this person, just give them a hug.

2. Depending on your relationship with the person, and if you can accept any blowback, it's also fine to say "I'm sorry, I don't want to be a receptacle for your complaining today."

3. Ask the person if they want help fixing the problem.
> However, we're also almost stating that the listener has spent considerable resources coming up with solutions which seem overly complicated to the speaker...

To be fair, it also indicates that the listener hasn't done a good enough job at explaining why their solution isn't "just" doing that.

It could also indicate that the speaker admits to maybe not getting the problem and "just" can sufficiently signal that the speaker thought the solution was simpler/smaller and needs more details on what's up (why not?). So there it serves as a crutch for the speaker's insecurity.

In the end it can be a useful word even if sometimes it isn't. In the end I'd suggest we don't always overanalyze and ask more additional questions, and adapt to each others use of words instead. I have coworkers who a) don't speak English well and b) have a very blunt way to point out things. Might be difficult the first few interactions to gauge their sentiment but I didn't jump to conclusions, and basically after a Zoom call to chat casually it became clear that's just how they communicate. I do suggest to them sometimes that using a different word might make them seem more approachable or nicer but ultimately I know they are nice and who is to say that my assumptions of how people should talk for me tp deem them polite are the right ones.
But they require dedicated lanes in many places and pay no taxes to fund those lanes. The pavement may not degrade as fast because cyclists don’t weigh much, but the road still needs painted and maintained. Cracks need sealed, potholes need filled. Weather cycles do as much damage as traffic.
Yes, I hadn't considered e-bikes when I made that comment. Definitely changes things.
What does this have to do with crypto?
ok, cool, didn't know that
I just lost 30 minutes down this rabbit hole. I am so excited to get into this.
Another useful thing to say, “oh no that sounds terrible, what are you going to do?” It can help reframe from complaining to strategizing, and that can make people more receptive to outside ideas.
In such situation, one should do what is the best for them. Not sticking around or running away may be unnatural and thus also emotionally taxing. Giving advice and trying to help, even if the person just wanted to vent, is not bad.

You [1] came to me with your problem. Now it's not only your problem, it's also my problem, since you shared it with me. I want that problem to go away, and will help you or give you advice how to deal with it. Then I will feel better. If I just listen to you, it may be the best thing for you, but for me it is the wrong thing to do, since I'm not made that way.

I you just want to vent so that you can feel better, don't make me feel worse because of that. Find someone else.

[1] "You" and "me" used for clarity, since "they" & "them" is confusing.
I assume Google Maps has data on average speed its users travel along all the roads.
Any references to help me unpack what you just said there?
You know, we have Maker spots where there's lots of equipment available for people to use to make whatever project they're working on without having to buy all the specialized tools. Why not let people rent a bay at a shop dedicated for bicycle maintenance and repair? They'd have all the tools and parts you need to come on in and do it yourself.
It is. So my advice is to build something that is interesting, and might have some value, and don't worry about it being financially viable. Then get it out there, iterate, pivot, learn and eventually you may find viability.

My point is, more often than not, there isn't a eureka moment when a fully fleshed out idea with financial viability just pops in your head. Oftentimes the best ideas start out small and boring. Use your day job as the de facto funder of your quest for viability.
Do you think the French Revolution happened in a vacuum? Without the ideals of Enlightenment philosophy it would have amounted to nothing more than mob violence (if it had even gotten started at all).
It's actually on a cron job to update every 30 minutes.

You can pop open it in a dashboard view to track - https://studio.patterns.app/graph/wnqkmhaf8a4ywqbpzb36/twitt...
AI has different systemic failiure modes than classic human intelligence. This is important because we are programmed to be sensitive to the traditional patterns.
&& if speakers are of sufficient size
They don't follow semver. v4 is basically a completely separate product from v5.
It's not quite as easy as slapping on a good physics engine and call it a day.

A good integration with a decent physics engine feels better in-game than a superb physics engine with a bad integration.

When programming physics there's many ways of getting the desired behavior from the physics system, and as with all problem solving some solutions are better/more stable than others.
Random thought: It may be possible to use PCI Passthrough, now or in the future -- to get an emulator such as QEMU to use a "proxied via network/software-stub" PCI (connected) chipset -- on a different computer...

This could be helpful to debug BIOS'es on machines where the x86 emulator does not natively support the chipset that the BIOS expects to be present (e.g., Older BIOS'es -- BIOS'es are generally tightly coupled to specific hardware and chipsets -- run a BIOS on a chipset it isn't expecting and it generally won't work... at least, not without serious changes...)...
Yes, that is true about every industry
IIRC I think a Reddit dev commented here on HN saying that that was the case. Can't find it again unfortunately, but it was the most popular top level comment on a thread about Reddit
I have a brief overview of eigenvectors as a 2D shear transformation in this overview of PageRank:

https://web.archive.org/web/20130728183938/williamcotton.com...
that's a good point but you do get warnings about issues (that you can block CI build on) and also much better IDE support
That is nice of you and you've helped them to cover server costs for the next two months. Server optimisations can help them reduce the cost further.
its also odd then re the python bindings being MIT, as the AGPL will convey throughout any aggregation or library usage, as would GPL, the primary delta for GPL vs AGPL is the intent on the later for network offered services, which in the context of an embedded library/db is odd. rightly or wrongly many orgs will refuse to allow usage of gpl/agpl software due to the licensing concerns around the effects of the rest of their ip. duckdb (embedded analytics sql) uses mit, etc. so in terms of creating a "true foss" project ie a community of users and contributors, its definitely worth considering a licensing change imho, but of course dealers choice.
Thanks for your contribution.

Besides adding image generation, how is this better than the existing text-generator plugin?
Another one of these that I hate is "why haven't you done X" or "you know X right" not as a question but as a suggestion. When I didn't know about X, or didn't even realize X was an option (particularly when it's niche knowledge that's not obvious), I get extra ticked off about the assumption. Please share your ideas without being condescending, it's worth it.
JDK 8 came out in 2014 and has support from Oracle (and plenty other vendors as well) till 2030, the least. That, plus Java is highly backwards compatible. Which platform can even come remotely close to its stability? Remember, it runs on an abstract instruction set, so there is no hardware-lock in (which happened with those fortran behemoths from the previous century - some of which actually chug along in VMs nowadays) effectively allowing code written for the platform to always be runnable.
Nimpressions
I think the parent is saying that under those conditions, the "undetectable" part of the title may be in question.
"It's important to zoom out and have some perspective."

I could say the same to you.

I'm listing one of many bad experiences.

Look at my other comments - I'm advocating for stricting driver testing because the current stuff is a joke.

How about the percentage of bad drivers vs bad cyclists? I see a lot of bad drivers because they're more drivers. I'd guess about 1 in 40 cars I see are doing something illegal and unsafe. I'd say I see 1 in 10 bicyclists doing something illegal and unsafe.

Yes, the severity is likely higher with a car. But don't handwave away the possibility of serious injury or death in an accident involving a bad cyclist, particularly if another driver is trying to avoid hitting them. Hitting a cyclist can be a lot like hitting a deer, and there are fatalities associated with that every year.

Edit: why disagree?
I would be glad if machines answer my questions.
> rely on always-on active radar which means you're lighting yourself up.

Because these systems have to work in formation without interfering with each other, they use pseudo random noise like signals and correlation based receivers. They're also mmw systems working at short range. It's not quite the suicidal beacon you're assuming, because it ends up the folks who design this stuff are in fact aware of the principle of emissions control.
Licensing under AGPL will make it hard for any startup to use Cozo. Lawyers always ask about AGPL in venture financing diligence and it is considered a red flag. You can argue that they are wrong, the linking exception and so on, but you’re basically shouting into the wind.