skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You're harder to effectively blackmail (and therefore less likely to be blackmailed) if you can't understand when someone's blackmailing you, for example.
I'm cryptoignorant (but trend skeptical). re: traceability, how about Monero?
Java has relatively recently gotten algebraic types with pattern matching + records. I find myself missing this feature anytime I use a language that doesn't support it.

> I don't know what all its wonderful tooling is.

Excellent refactoring tools by IDEs. Second to none profiling and monitoring (JFR, etc). Excellent debugging tools, profilers, etc.

Nothing else comes close frankly. C# it a not so close second.

OpenJDK is free. Oracle will not sue you.
I recommend to try the free workshops by https://www.identitydevelopmentinstitute.com/ - please report back!
Your point is well taken on many examples, but this was not one. hah
Therein lies the rub, wouldn't you say? ;-)
You can probably start with college level books since they dont really teach much chemistry in high school anyway.
Eigen not understand a word of this.
I don't know how it works in other languages, but accessing a partially overwritten slice in Go (as will happen in the presence of data races) can cause your code to access out-of-bounds memory. And as we all know, once you have read/write access to arbitrary areas in memory, you've basically opened up Pandora's box.
From my experience with Python and Ruby, it's not the database itself, it's the database driver that spends quite some time on serialization and deserialization every time you want to send around some data, even more so when you pack some objects to store as semistructured/json/xml.
So no, it's not the database, it's your interpreted language.
I have the same perception of a change - not something as simple as it going from "not OK" to "OK", but definitely a change. It's not that surprising if we also accept that division and bitterness have significantly increased over the past decade or two, since resorting to political deception more often and more dramatically would also reasonably increase in such an environment.
Not OP but, for a while you could email a message to 5559991212@verizon.net and it would send a text to the phone number 555-999-1212. Not sure if it still works that way though.
I stand corrected.

It's not very well written.
Maybe you’re referring to an infinite baffle setup like this:

https://jonathanfoulkes.com/ibsub

https://ibsubwoofers.proboards.com/board/13/builders-gallery
It's not 3 years of support though, if you ship mid next year it's 1.5 with no alternative to choose.
> Without data to back this claim

But, at least for a large subset of tech companies that have had layoffs, there is data to back up this claim. That is, many companies went on huge, gigantic, enormous hiring binges during the pandemic, often expecting a "new normal" in terms of overall spending on internet and other tech services.

I mean, look at Twitter employment over time: https://www.statista.com/statistics/272140/employees-of-twit... . With the layoffs they'll be not much under pre-pandemic levels. Jack Dorsey even said he hired too fast: https://twitter.com/jack/status/1588913276980633600. The same rationale was given by Patrick Collison for Stripe's layoffs: https://stripe.com/newsroom/news/ceo-patrick-collisons-email...
Regulations aren't exclusive to the US.

Many parts of the world e.g. Australia are heavily regulated in the financial sector and will not be looking to water them down just because its 'crypto'.
My personal experience tinkering with Lisp is that it can sometimes be very hard to actually achieve the legendary high performance of SBCL, without your code getting verbose and ugly. Yes, you could ostensibly wrap that ugliness up in macros, but then you're inventing your own DSL and a compiler in the macro engine, which I guess is what the true Lisp nerds live for, but I have too few brain cells and too little time/energy to shave such big yaks.
That's not really how this works - it's instance filtering, there isn't content analysis happening. If there's "good" content on the filtered instances it'll also be blocked indiscriminately - that's known & intended.

The "solution" is to move instances (which is very well facilitated by the platform, including data portability).
And web forms to core was/is terrible.
We got about 770k req/s with the current version vs 582k from japronto using TechEmPower plaintext benchmarks and we still can get at least 30% or more performance once fully integrated with libuv + asyncio :D
Isn't this an assumption of the "popular vote compact" that has been enacted in some of the leftist states? They would send their electoral votes to the winner of the nationwide popular vote without regard to what the people in the state voted. The legality of this compact requires that states be able to override the wishes of their population in any given vote and assign electors based on other criteria.
>The Golden Book of Chemistry Experiments (1960)
This is more of a spear at the title than the content, which is orthogonal: I'm spending a good chunk of my spare time working on chemistry. I'm building a molecular model of proteins in an aqueous environment on the computer. The computing and knowledge resources available make this approachable - probably more so than anytime in history.
I’m hesitant. As somehow who suffers from nightmares I’ve been given medicine for this purpose and while the nightmares went away it was weird. Like non-scary dreams that were meant to be scary but replaced with ridiculous mundane things. Because of this I realized I was dreaming instantly and woke up every time which led to less sleep
Only if the central entity can be trusted not to become a corrupt rent seeker.

(Looks meaningfully at TicketMaster)
And in this case the room's interest was in denying reality.

You cannot solve a problem that you haven't acknowledged.
I think (low confidence) this is due to basic chem being not-composable. And of course, possibly dangerous in a hard to detect way.
Hello, your comment does not follow guidline "Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive." per https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html. Please be more constructive.
This is my view as to what possibly happened in last 24 hours. Mind you I have no idea if its real but i am making an educated guess based on my 10+ yrs seeing such events play out several times.

1) Alameda used FTX money and balance sheet along with using $FTT to take out billions of loans and "investments" including possibly customer funds to "invest" "efficiently" into risky investments

2) He then also used a lot of it to prop the entire market up in the 1250-1350
range over months to decouple the market possibly and keep $FTT above the $22 mark which was possibly a margin level for his collateral.

3) Market rallied and everything was fine. He is up a lot but lost few between making potentially risky investments (maybe shorting?), maybe
options market making as that was his original expertise... who knows. But he clearly lost some money in there.

4) Rumors spread of balance sheet shortfall. Now mind you .. Alameda is a separate entity than FTX. So using FTX resources for trading on Alameda is a big no no.

5) CZ finds out about this. Decides to market sell his billions of $FTT position. Caroline gives up her hands and says they will buy at $22 which on the chart you can see has been the support line time and time again so clearly that line has been supported constantly..

6) The market selling pushes price below $22. Entire market and large players smell blood.. the moment the price goes below $22 the lenders market sell coins ($FTT and $SOL) for margin. This results in a loop after it breaks below $22 and goes into freefall with no support anymore

7) With no options to get more money from lenders and having no other assets to get more loans from lenders as they are already selling his assets, SBF goes to CZ and asks to bail out FTX as there is a big hole that cannot be filled anymore. CZ probably decided to take over FTX and said to SBF you have to either stop gap some of the fills from selling your assets since you did things wit the balance sheet and customer money you weren't supposed to. He probably said he will bail out FTX but NOT Alameda. Sam then either market sold everything he had...OR the lenders... Sam went to the lenders and said I am defaulting on my loans...So the lenders just market sold all the collateral. I think its most likely Sam said he is going to default on the loans and they market sold.

IF the lenders recouped 70-80% then i think its fine.

IF the lenders WERE NOT able to recoup and will have to take a write off on the loans.. we have issues. That part I am unsure about. IF a large lender goes under... then there is further contagion. The market selling off coins so quickly triggered probably more liquidations.

WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? We have seen bigger black swan events like in crypto past. All new concepts have days weeks like this. Stocks had it, banks had it and crypto has had it few times. There will always be new smart people to push growth and take over.

When 3AC went bust, we got to $800 on $ETH. We rebounded to 2k in time. That was close to 17-18bn. This is smaller. in time... we will be back. Not sure when.. but eventually it all comes back. Market is cyclical end of the day.
OP's description is super unclear. What are "credits" that Adobe removed? Access to the assets OP purchased or something else?

I read it as Adobe were _never_ able to charge the card, not just this one time. If my reading is correct, then I don't see an issue with taking back something that was never paid for.
This isn’t a thing, limited liability (which is the fundamental principle that distinguishes corporations from partnerships) prevents this. The only way would be if SBF was charged with defrauding FTX
"States rights for my pet causes, not for thine!" is one of the remarkably consistent principles one finds in US politics. Annoyingly. We'd be a lot better off if things were put back to the states.
It happens to me with only the tiniest little green speck in a bowl. Regardless of strain. Sometimes it's because someone took to much, but some people really do just get panic attacks from it.

I used to be a daily smoker, then something in my body just flipped. I have a couple friends where the same thing happened in their early 30s.

I've gotten bad anxiety from smoking too much in the past, but these are different. Full blown panic attacks with heart-attack-like symptoms and crushing fear. (My cardiologist checked me out, it really is just panic attacks).

It did used to be great at preventing nightmares for me (and it was fun). Sure, sleep quality was worse than ideal but I almost never had an ideal night of sleep. But now I've tried too many times to find "the secret" to stop me from having panic attacks, nothing works and it's just made me become anxious at the sight/smell of weed.
"The child survives the Trauma of Identity by giving up on his healthy identity, his autonomy, in order to have some connection with his mother, without whom he cannot survive. He is forced to identify with his mother's wants and needs, where his wants and needs are ignored, mis-interpreted or used as a means of persecution by the mother. This, then, brings the therapeutic question "Who am I?". And existentially this question is automatically followed by the question "What do I want?", because in order to know what I want I must have a reasonable sense of who I am.

The Trauma of Love happens when the connection that the child does manage to maintain with his mother after the Trauma of Identity is not in effect a clear, loving connection, but rather a connection that is painful, unfulfilling, manipulative and persecutory.

These traumas form the foundation of our life, our ability to grow up with a healthy, stable psyche, or not. All later experiences that constitute a trauma are always, also, a re-stimulation of these early, pre-verbal, pre-memory events."

https://www.vivianbroughton.com/about-iopt/
In other reporting of this, it was noted that voters of the two parties feel this for different reasons.

Republicans think democracy is under threat because Joe Biden allegedly stole the election.

Democrats think democracy is under threat because of January 6 and Trump's thing about "fake" electors, or calling the Georgia governor to change vote totals, or that many state candidates for Secretary of State are pledging to enact or repeat the above.

So even if most Americans feel "democracy is in danger", each side's proposed solutions would be incompatible with the other.
Doesn't that just say more about how obtuse these settings are designed to be though?
These things are basically huge lumps of solid concrete. You can blow them up, but a blast strong enough to reduce them to rubble requires way more explosives than a single tank shell can pack. Combat engineers can do it better and faster.
Headphone Eye Mask – Stop Doomscrolling and Disrupting Your Circadian Rhythm
> There's no attempt to dupe you - a full treatment of the problems with temperature data is a book sized topic, that's all.

There are a lot of book sized (and larger) data sets and many people that study them.

More than a decade ago Richard A. Muller fell in with the climate deniers and studied the Urban Heat centre bias mythology to death hoping from the outset to find it true.

> When we began our study ( Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature ), we felt that skeptics had raised legitimate issues, and we didn't know what we'd find.

> Our results turned out to be close to those published by prior groups. We think that means that those groups had truly been very careful in their work, despite their inability to convince some skeptics of that. They managed to avoid bias in their data selection, homogenization and other corrections.

> Global warming is real. Perhaps our results will help cool this portion of the climate debate.

You seem to be fixated upon a long debunked point that never panned out under close study.
Yup. The code was written with portability in mind. As soon as I get time to test it on Firefox I'll do it.
> The government has made crypto obsolete or unusable.

i don’t think you can really say this until the DNMs meaningfully shrink in size.

US govt has had like one major success that i know of in shutting down DNMs — Silk Road — since then there’s always been a dozen or so in operation that serve most/all the big countries whose govt you would expect to track crypto.
No, you said that, not me! ha ha ha

And as you note below, if it's fun for you to trot out all this "science" then please, don't let me spoil your broth. I'll just contend that science is about testing hypotheses and leave it at that.

Lastly, yes, lots still to learn about hearing and audio. Someday maybe we'll have measurements that allow for certain comparisons to be valid across human aural experience and electrical transducers.
Appointing senators didn't work because it became a corrupt office you could purchase.

In a world where gerrymandering is scientifically practiced, state-wide federal elections are some of the few where democracy is actually practiced. Reverting senators to being appointed is just removing what few levers of accountability currently exist in the federal system.
The Senate and the Electoral College are a basic part of the problem here. For example, Los Angeles County alone has a greater population than entire states but gets a fraction of the proportional representation of Rhode Island.
In general, when I see someone on the cover of Fortune, I expect their business's half-life to be about a year. This has been very consistent because of the process of getting on the cover of Fortune and kind of people who push to get on it
Maybe not the answer you expect, but a sufficiently ab-initio simulation is not something our current knowledge of chemistry permits! You could approach your problem with various degrees of approximation. Personally, I'm optimistic that we may make great progress in this area in the coming years, decades, and centuries. It's traditionally described as a lack of computing power, but I'm guessing there's a fair chunk of knowledge yet undiscovered that could help.
> but also whether people who rated it seem to come from different perspectives.

How do you achieve that?
Here, specifically: Twitter has officially announced that the blue check mark does not mean "verified". Here's a tweet: https://twitter.com/esthercrawford/status/159010953045281587.... She says, "The new Twitter Blue does not include ID verification – it’s an opt-in, paid subscription that offers a blue checkmark and access to select features." A number of commenters of course then ask, "Then why do you keep calling it verification?"
Yup, there most definitely will be. Hoping to do it within the next few months.
For one thing, Cython isn't a Python implementation.

As for the rest, of course not. Especially not those two in particular. But PyPy and Pyston are doing pretty well on compatibility. Not sure about Stackless, but I think it's mostly been subsumed by PyPy anyway (even though it's still being developed independently).

The main problem for alternative implementations of Python is the C extensions, much like with Ruby. But the Python community has started to take ownership of the problem and a new C interface is being developed, called HPy, that is easier to implement for non-CPython implementations, and library developers are taking an interest in targeting HPy instead of the traditional CPython interface. With that in place, Python will be in a pretty good place when it comes to standardization.
My assumption when reading the quote was that it would be an off-market transaction.

Similar to how stocks can be traded in Dark Pools outside of the regular stock market.
Having your fortunes eviscerated and remaining a billionaire. That’s something else.
Deliver better price-performance by selecting the right cloud to run API Gateway
Yup, for what it’s worth I ride a road bike in a mountainous area - so my brakes see a lot of use. The 2000km vs 4000km estimates above are for similar riding conditions on both bikes.

I agree that disc brakes are more important for mountain bikes than road bikes. Disc brakes certainly feel nicer to use, but about the only time that rim brakes feel insufficient to me on a road bike is descending in the rain. And even then it’s manageable if I just maintain a slower speed on the descent.
Complex PTSD can be a condition that involves significant to total amnesia of the events causing it, while seeming to appear as constant hypervigilance in the present day. Just a note, even parental emotional neglect (which we tend to develop a blind eye to purely for survival's sake) is enough to cause c-PTSD to form (as defined in the most recent ICD).

I'm not necessarily DX'ing but I wish someone had pointed me at some resources when I was just starting to ask the inkling of the same questions. I'm getting to do the work at a much younger age that I see not many people doing until the end of their lives, though it is sort of hell being young and all.

Pete Walker's book on Complex PTSD is an amazing read regardless for anyone in the community, I'd say without diagnosing that as a potential avenue -- take a read of a few snippets, see if they resonate with you (or trigger massive denial/distraction chains), and just work your way through the book slowly if so. The techniques in there can help anyone with even "just" an internal (or otherwise) critic. :)

Hope this helps, the brain is an interesting place and we've only gotten some really good resources for misc conditions that don't externally seem to fit a particular mold. I'm starting to believe that every trauma reaction variant is some exemplar mode of some superset of possible adaptive coping mechanisms, and that in reality the dx and treatment of these things can be much more on point than the diagnosis of "anxiety" or "depression", which I'm viewing more and more as exceptionally frivolous and misleading as a standalone diagnosis (instead of as a descriptor, or a modifier), and is oftentimes as effective as diagnosing someone with "a fever" or "chills and aches". Doing so would alienate the person (in my eyes) and would take a place in a/the diagnosis "slot" that could hold something more informative to their actual base condition (instead of being a rather shallow observation with practically zero actionable value.... And we wonder why a variety of treatments for depression, for example, have low-30's success ratings across multiple stages of trying different treatments! I can't remember the exact numbers but the 4-5 stage...STAR study, I think it is, was one of the biggest and rather disappointing. The future seems somewhat promising but still too far away.... ::( )

Knowing _why_ is the very extremely hard part. :))))
https://www.discogs.com/release/17502538-James-Dukas-Narrato...

I bought this album on Google Music, which got shut down and I didn't copy it off in time. Now I can't find it online.
I have an nft of a tiny violin.
You can't. You live with that. Everyone around us does it. Bad politicians, bad owners, bad managers, bad leaders, etc. A bad director in your company temporarily affects you, but finally is just a job.

In general, I agree 100% with your comment, in my career so far I would say I met only 1 leader, the rest is good talkers or people who know how to keep their positions.

Unfortunately I have come to the realization that it's just how it is, and you move on. Life is not just work, and some people know better how to climb the ladder than others, some are just luckier. Etc. Etc. Therefore I learnt to be happy with what I have, knowing that it could be better or worse. When it's too bad, it's probably time to move on.
I too grew up finding those cool chemistry books in the library. For that reason I have collected some of my favorites. Kenneth Swezey's books were particularly good. Fortunately a few of them are on archive.org. I wish they still polished books like this — rather than "grossology" books or whatever.

Swezey on archive.org:

https://archive.org/details/chemistrymagic00swez

https://archive.org/details/sciencemagic0000swez

https://archive.org/details/afterdinnerscien00swez
I was thinking about something less expensive and beefy than one of those $100+, 800 pages textbooks. [1] [2] [3] [4] Something closer in format to the MIT Essential Knowledge Series.

[1] https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Chemistry-Rich-Bauer/dp/...

[2] https://www.amazon.com/Chemistry-Introduction-General-Organi...

[3] https://www.amazon.com/Introductory-Chemistry-6th-Nivaldo-Tr...

[4] https://www.amazon.com/Introductory-Chemistry-Foundation-Ste...
Twitter to introduce 'Official' label for some verified accounts
In my experience 9/10 web application performance problems are related to database interactions. Is the query using an index? Are you hammering your DB with 300 N+1 queries to render an API response. These are usually the biggest offenders when poor performance is observed. If you're interactions with you DB are bad, it doesn't matter what programming language you use, performance will be mostly equally awful regardless of language.
A high school friend's older brother did PhD research in short-acting drugs that were legal because they were so obscure. We got banned from my high school chem lab after an after-hours session left a uniform white residue on all surfaces. My friend said we were mopping up water with an eraser. The VP found this explanation wanting.

I switched to math.
Remember this when people ask for a software engineer union. The people standing to your right and left will be like this.

Put them all together to advocate together and think of what they will want done with you.

They've already got the angle to exploit you on lined up. And secretly, this is what they think. So what happens when you give them the power?
Removed since parent comment was drastically changed.