skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Well, yes, powershell takes some shortcuts and has the advantage that .NET has a strong object system.

If you were to build it from scratch with the idea of "shared nothing" applications similar to the unix model with text files, it's not that much more difficult with just about any sort of object or message broker. You could easily imagine a world with a dbus based "REPL"/shell, for instance. Or a different approach easily imaginable if you still want to focus on unix-style streams/files between processes would be something like BSON streams (thought it would still have some serialization/deserialization overhead).
Besides all the publicly stated reasons for doing this, is this just an excess money dump in order to retain non-profit status? Like the Gates and Zuckerberg Foundations, etc do for tax reasons?
Well, that's sort of an underlying problem with markets in general though, now isn't it? The mass of consumers create momentum that shift what is and isn't viable. It happens in all sorts of products, phones for example shifted to non-removable batteries.

Regardless to your personal stance on this issue, the mass of consumers were fine with it and therefore demand has dictated largely what's reasonably available to your average citizen--phones with difficult to swap batteries. There are still some options but they're scarce and require tradeoffs from most flagship phones.

That's with something less (yet increasingly) significant as a smart phone. When your product is information such as books, or education, such as in universities, suddenly you have markets and the masses dictating what's available and indirectly censoring content. Heck, it happens in science all the time these days. There are dominant groups and names in fields who hold significant sway, they often influence funding agencies and ultimately influence where scientists can viably perform research (unless they can self fund their work).

But yes, markets can and do censor based on demand. I don't blame a small bookstore owner in this context for censoring, it's a systemic issue they have little power over. As you point out they have to pick and choose based on demand signal, they're running a business after all, yet if the only source of the information can be obtained through bookstores, suddenly markets are indirectly dictating to bookstores who indirectly dictate to consumers what information is available.

Sometimes we want this effect, we want markets to help us pressure and bubble up certain products or solutions to the top, other times we might not want this to be the case (as in free speech and flow of information).
trying out.
Please make the password field plaintext
It wasn’t necessarily obvious that specific banks would fail but it was obvious that the big guys were playing high-risk games and were going to be left with a lot of foreclosures or writing off a lot of paper value. This was known to basically everyone in the industry, too - I briefly considered buying in New Haven in 2008 and got mortgage pre-approvals from a few banks. I had an interesting conversation with an older loan officer at a Connecticut state bank, who was the only one who didn’t approve me for WAY more than I thought reasonable and explained why very matter of factly, and noted that since his bank didn’t resell the mortgages as CDOs they had to be more careful about risk.
Oh really? I thought I just had to point DNS entries and that's it. Bah, I guess I don't mind then.
What do you think is a better way of doing it? Elections seem like the most fair way to me
Boa, an experimental JavaScript lexer, parser and interpreter written in Rust
They mine you CV for info and use that for lead generation.
Most layoffs will include some low performers, but almost never only or all low performers.

If lucky and done right, performance will (inversely) correlate with probability of layoff.
I'm not sure why this can't work with basically any email provider? Setup you domain like normal, and configure gmail to forward all incoming mail to your address on your domain.

What is the feature you're missing here?
> You grant them a separate licence when you start using their service.

And that license explicitly states that it doesn't give them the right to sell your code.
The Brian using entanglement would completely destroy modern physics as we know it, the effect on biology would be tiny by comparison.

Your other points are based on such fundamental misunderstanding that it’s hard to respond. Saying something isn’t the output of classical computing processes while undemonstrated, is then used to justify saying they must therefore use Quantum Phenomenon. But logically not everything that is either classical or Quantum so even that logical inference is unjustified. Logically it’s like saying well it’s not a soda so it must be a rock.

PS: If people where observed to solve problems that can’t be solved by classical computer processing that would be a really big deal. As in show up on Nightly News, and win people Nobel prizes big. Needless to say it hasn’t happened.
You don't generally use the standard library when doing embedded, especially when they're small.

Some of our Rust programs at work, while simple, are hundreds of bytes.
They are for several reasons. They are lying about the price of rent, saying it is higher than it is. They are insisting that you need to live in Manhattan, when there are places about half as cheap very close to Manhattan.

I'm not saying the area is inexpensive. Don't argue with a strawman.
I went down this path. Yes, Windows includes an inbox USB audio class driver, but it lacks support for implicit feedback. The MOTU interface does not have a feedback endpoint, and relies on implicit feedback, so the inbox driver doesn't work. I think the inbox driver does work for Focusrite's interfaces - I guess they include the feedback endpoint, and both Linux and macOS support implicit feedback so MOTU's devices work there. Apple actually recommend implicit feedback only [0].

[0] - https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/technotes/tn2274...
It's all a matter of perspective. From CrowNews.com: "Humans Found to Be Dumber Than We Think."
Stop obsessing over subscriber growth.

Youtube is comprised of one big ocean and a land with millions of tiny lakes:
1. A homogenous demographic that drives the growth of most major channels
2. A heterogenous demographic of niche hobbies and educational material

Your channel can never go viral if you cater to group 2. Each interest group is tiny. At best, you will get some of group 1 watching your niche channel out of osmosis.

Group 1 is mostly children. Despite what youtube reports, most billion-view videos are kids videos. Most users are children. There is a reason Beluga, pewdiepie, and Mr.Beast are top channels. If you aren't hawking that sort of thing, youtube is not a good market for you to grow in.
hmmm. I have had my personal domain on google domains. But have had a custom domain email with outlook from back when it was free. Though I guess I'll need to migrate to something else now.
I believe what was meant was quantum-only or primarily-quantum effects rather than the aggregate effects we normally see (classic physics & chemistry), which are probably the result of quantum physics, but we have "classic" abstractions that model them well enough. Thus, the issue is whether the brain relies mostly on classic effects (common aggregate abstractions) for computations or on quantum-specific effects.
> Is it not? I honestly can't think of anything I'd want it to do more than it already does.

Give me 4x less battery draw and I'll try Firefox again, I want to use and like Firefox but every time I give it a go power usage remains a massive issue. I get at least 4x less power draw in the same activities on chromium based browsers and safari.
> Email is the paradigmatic example

But there's no monopoly. There's feature-based lock-in built around the open protocols, and it's very effective, but it's not a monopoly.
Couple of things:

Nobody owes their employer any more than the minimum that is guaranteed by the employment contract. Sucks, but that's life.

If you feel like the quality of your coworkers that give minimum effort is screwing you over, talk to your employer.

If an employer can be picky enough that they require you to only have them as your only employer, they would need to specify that in an employment contract (it's not enforceable, you have a right to privacy from your employer).

If you want to be "ethical" (ie, servile to your employer) to the detriment of your economic survival, that's fine. That's your choice. Everyone else is going to play the game to the rules.
If I draw some eyes in Photoshop, it won't automatically draw the Mona Lisa around it for me.
free article with picsutes: https://theperfectenemy.com/i-spent-10-days-in-a-secret-chin...
Probably not using the standard version quickjs since it uses syscalls and all, but (with some workarounds with threads/syscalls/fs) it could probably run.
We all love Ooey Gooey Cookies, right?

So, how can I make that without killing the crowd? That's the question of the day.

Is stevia a decent substitute for sugar? Is sugar ok if consumed on weekends only? I know, silly questions.

And then we get Jenny McCarthy provoking editorials, targeting the people who could use knowledgeable advice.

And years later, we'll be lectured on bad decisions.
These AI systems are all riding on fair use anyway (at least for now), so it doesn't matter what license you choose because they're never accepting it in the first place.
Outlook.com webmail.

But separately, MS is definitely killing on-prem Exchange as well. Maybe not today, but they have been very clear that they want everyone in their cloud.
I knew they programmed in Lisp! But they write it in Cuneiform with their beaks.
I have actually received performance review notes at my current and former job (both with unlimited PTO) for not taking enough PTO...

But in both cases, the CEOs actively encouraged PTO. At my current job, people take PTO regularly (several people at my department have taken roughly 3-4 months of PTO over the course of the past 12 months, and were promoted). What matters isn't time-in-seat, but whether tasks get done.
The first concern is identifying "fake news".

One of the biggest political news stories of 2020, Hunter Biden's laptop, was falsely declared misinformation, and the NY Post was accused of being a low quality site. Now we know it's true.

On the other hand, the Steele Dossier was considered legitimate news at the time and "many of the dossier’s most explosive claims...have never materialized or have been proved false."[1].

So I'd like to know exactly what the study's authors considered low-quality news, but unfortunately I couldn't find a list in the paper you linked. In my experience, most people tend to declare sources "high-quality" or "low-quality" based on whether they share the same worldview.

1: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/15/business/media/spooked-pr...
The Apache Foundation doesn't produce the software, people paid by various companies do. This is quite similar to the Mozilla Foundation and Corporation relationship.

Who would employ people to work on Firefox if the corp side shuts down eg. because they lose their revenue?
Maybe researchers that are used to hunting for publications and attributions.

If I’m sharing my code publicly, it’s because I want it to be _used_.
I never understood why a 'dictionary' (so called conveniently in python) is called a 'map' in c++ and yet, a 'hash' in ruby. On a side note, a map in ruby is an operation that actively maps one thing to another. So confusing. Finally reading what you just wrote makes the pieces of this puzzle to fall in place! Never had a data structures class.
I want to write boring ground-up CRUD apps. How do I find that work? I'm tired of big distributed systems that are too complex for a person to grok.
> There is not a understood natural phenomenon which we could not capture in math.

This is a belief about our ability to construct models, not a fact. Models are leaky abstractions, by nature. Models using models are exponentially leaky.

> I didn't say we can simulate it.

Mathematics (at large) is descriptive. We describe matter mathematically, as it's convenient to make predictions with a shared modeling of the world, but the quantum of matter is not an equation. f() at any scale of complexity, does not transmute.
So he gets to make money with his profession while defending OSS licenses? I don't see the big problem.
its not Brexit. They spent 700 billion on covid.
A Suggestion for Twitter
Heroku Data Labs CLI
How the Brazilian Presidential elections affected Internet traffic
> Next years S&P earnings around 200

My biggest concern is, while I agree with you that S&P 2023 EPS TTM could end up being $200, because we have not yet seen this reflected in estimates (Yardeni earnings forecasts shows $235 as an estimate), we have more room to fall before the expectation (let alone the reality) of that is priced in.

$235 Yarendi expectation -> $200 your expectation is a 15% difference. That means analysts (and consequentially the market pricing in those analysts expectations) are "incorrectly" estimating earnings 15% higher than they might be in your opinion.

Scary times.
The most high profile, and controversial, "moderation" decisions made by large platforms recently have generally been for obvious, and very public, reasons.
I don't get the push for cellular modem in Laptop either. Who is actually asking for this, since most of us have could just tether off our existing phone or use a wifi hotspot, and wouldn't, like you mention, need to pay an extra $20/month.
could you share why you think that to be so? I felt that my example was a specific subset of “beliefs”, which is very much on-subject.

Simply throwing out “logical fallacy!” when you think it occurs doesn't really drive the conversation forward.
> One of the responsibilities of central banks is to carefully control messaging

That might be exactly what they're doing. The article says that their forward guidance for interest rate hikes is substantially below market expectations. Maybe they are hoping that a bit of gloomy talking will do some the work of slowing down price dynamics, reducing the need for them to take more drastic measures.
Huh, for some reason, I thought that the FCC would fine and regulate this company into oblivion after their unauthorized launch stunt. Looks like that didn't quite happen the way I expected.

https://spacenews.com/swarm-ceo-talks-past-mistakes-future-g...
Optimizing for what, and in who's interests?

From the perspective of those who are not shareholders, corporations are just a means of providing some service - even those that are 'necessary'.

It's odd that so many people fight so hard for the 'freedom and rights' of fairly powerful interests, systems which they will never be a part of or benefit from, and which regularly act against their own interests.

There are multiple stakeholders at play, the arbitrary posture of 'optimization for capital' is worse than naive in 2022, we've been through these experiments by now.

There are better ways; we're not even trying.
Can there be a moderation bot that detects flamewars and steps in? It could enforce civility by limiting discussion to only go through the bot and by employing protocols like "each side summarize issues", "is this really important here", or "do you enjoy this".

Engaging with the bot is supposed to be a rational barrier, a tool to put unproductive discussions back on track.
In 2021 I did a live stream every Saturday for 52 weeks straight. It was actually a lot of fun as I was working on my side project most weekends anyway and I wanted to start streaming it. By the end of the first year I had about 1K subscribers, but most live streams still got the same viewership, if not less. I'm closing in on year 2 now and passed 2K subs recently.

I echo some of the comments here about posting videos about things you want and not trying to play the YouTube game. Every time I have tried I've felt greasy, and it rarely helped.

Even for my non-live stream videos, I almost always do them all in 1 go with no editing. It helps me get good at speaking, is more natural and take a lot less time to finish.

My biggest problem has been motivation and time. I feel like I have a lot of videos I want to discuss, but doing the videos requires a certain energy that I've had trouble firing up lately.

For anyone interested in checking out my channel/vids: https://www.youtube.com/c/DustinBrett
You mean the e-mail client that the vast majority of U.S. companies use daily to send and receive millions if not billions of emails?

Yeah, I'm sure they'll get right on that.
Sounds like Polish people contributing to the training corpus are simply happier than the Portuguese contributor population, who perhaps also lived 100 years prior...
Amazfit Bip S - https://www.amazfit.com/uk/amazfit-bip-s.html

- 40 day battery life

- HR monitor

- 11.4mm thickness

- Always on transreflective screen

It's not hackable, is a bit thicker and only has one button but unlike the Fenix 7 it is very affordable.
I have a 365 family subscription thing (got it on discount from MS friends) and looked into the custom domain but it was missing important features like catch-all. Glad I didn't adopt it now.
Authelia is the giant open source elephant in this room
They said "Do be critical, but not sensational", they're not asking you to hide criticism, just to do it in a productive fashion.
But the how would you address "reputable" people spreading idiotic things or fake news? How would you prevent Joe Rogan spreading COVID conspiracy theories? Or Kanye's antisemitic comments? Or a celebrity hyping up some NFT for a quick cash grab? Or Elon Musk falling for some fake news and spreading it?
New Study Links Dementia to Metabolism
It's always been there in tech. Employee referrals are the hoi polloi flavor of it.
I disagree, we can't frame this discussion on only the content. My whatsapp "feed" is doing just fine. The problem are all the other whatsapp groups that I'm not in, which are filled with hateful politics. It hurts when I meet in real life a friend that you haven't met in a while, and then find out that they've been radicalized.

The radical Bolsonaro whatsapp groups are a mix of top down and grass roots content. On one end there is the central "propaganda office", or other top political articulators. On the bottom are the grassroots group chats: neightborhoods, churches, biker communities, office mates, etc. Memes and viral content flow in both directions. The contents and messages that ressonate in the lower levels are actively distributed by the central articulators, which have a hierarchy of group chats to circulate new propaganda as widely as possible. You can see this happen in real time when a political conundrum happens,e.g a corruption scandal. The central office will A-B test various messages in their group chats and then the one that resonates better with their base gets amplified and suddenly they manage to "change the topic" on the news. The end result is that we just had 4 years of political chaos, where the modus operandi of the goverment was to put out fires by deflecting the public discourse whenever a new crisis emerged. It's not merely a content problem that could be solved by a better filtration algorithm. It's a deeper issue of how social media can affect human behavior. How quickly ideas can spread, how easy it became for people to self-organize into "bubbles", and so on.
That's not the meaning of proprietary, but otherwise you're right.
In face of what's going on, repeatedly calling people "remoaners" to this day just proves there can be had no intelligent discussion with you.

But sure, keep insulting people and crying "no one listens to our reasons." Because all we can hear now is the Brexit voting areas collectively feeling duped. Not by the Remoaners, but by those that promised to take back your bloody borders they so much cared about and now are poorer than they were before.

At least now you get to keep your pints, pounds and bendy bananas, I guess. Worth it mate.

(Nevermind, looks like you live in Illinois, US. Looking forward to hear your informed opinion on British politics and how post Brexit life actually is.)
Elon Musk is a prominent member of the tech industry and of Silicon Valley history, dating back to the days of Zip2 and Paypal. It's just a fact.
I was really hoping Microsoft would expand this feature. I currently use a Microsoft 365 Business account for my personal email, and it feels like using a chainsaw to open a letter. One of the biggest gripes I have is the fact that a "Microsoft Account" and a Microsoft 365 account are two separate things, and you can't use a Microsoft 365 Account email for a Microsoft Account. Several Microsoft services only work with Microsoft Accounts, so I keep a @outlook.com email around just for those rare instances.

For example, I believe Xbox only allows Microsoft Accounts, so I wouldn't be able to login to an Xbox using my primary email address.
Which is the kind of stuff that makes me think there should have been or maybe be a second vote now people know what the actual deal is. Still I went on the 2nd vote marches but the MPs weren't having it. Dunno where it goes now.
You are confusing the nondiscrete math of physics with the discrete math of computation. Even with unlimited computational resources, we can’t simulate arbitrary physical systems exactly, or even with limited error bounds (see chaos theory). What a program (mathematical or not) in the turing-machine sense can do is only a tiny, tiny subset of what physics can do.

Personally I believe it’s likely that the brain can essentially be reduced to a computation, but we have no proof of that.
Services like ImprovMX will love this. They can make any domain you own and link it to your email account without setup on the mailbox. gandi.net gives you 2 free inboxes for every domain you own, but the free tier has limited services and size.
Just as people nowadays exclaim "Stallman was right", I suspect that in the future there will be a similar sense that "Barry was right", particularly once Linux users find themselves legally mandated to run some kind of "systemd-gatekeeperd" to check that they aren't executing any binaries whose hashes (or developer signatures) appear on a government-maintained blacklist.

(I know that technically this functionality could be implemented without systemd, so a government could pass a "Gatekeeper"[0] law regardless of whether systemd existed, but the way it integrates with the boot process, especially so-called "Secure Boot", and the kernel, and controls process permissions, means that 90% of Linux users are just one unwanted software update away from complying with this law. That in turn makes it much harder to oppose such a law being introduced).

[0] https://www.pcmag.com/news/apple-explains-why-it-grabs-data-...
Has anyone else noticed that Ford is secretly mastering quick turnaround (relatively speaking) on new models to catch certain trends?

Specifically, I'm thinking of two examples so far:

1. Ford Lightning electric pickup

2. This van

Neither of these are super unique in the market but that's not really the point. Maybe I'm out of touch but my impression of automakers is 10-year lead times and a fixed selection with maximum mainstream appeal, and a few trims and color choices. Conversely, Ford seems to be jumping on "niche trends" (again, relative to the industry) with only a year or two of lead time.
Law-abiding companies like Microsoft won't knowingly violate a license.

My understanding is that Microsoft makes an effort to exclude all GPL software from its training. (Is this true?)

What we need is a more permissive MIT- or BSD-style license that defeats Copilot.

We just need to convince law-abiding companies that they must not use the code.
Also, the Neo is worth looking at as you get four buttons https://www.amazfit.com/en/neo
The earnings in the P/E equation are going to come down.

And during a recession investors usually expect the P/E multiple to come down.

Apple must be starting to see the downturn.