skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Aw, that's an unsatisfying answer!

I'm a total .NET noob, but this attempt in Compiler Explorer shows it not using the xor trick.

https://godbolt.org/z/jhzqxEKzT

Maybe I need some extra compiler flags or something.
Scalaz.
You only think in words?
It seems that using Remix would indeed be just using React + server stuff.
Seems there's an extra slash '/' at the end of the url that causes that
Thanks I will look into it but on first glance their testing still seems like its under lab conditions. Thanks for the tip!
>That's simply not what tolerating the words and opinions of others means though. It doesn't mean that you can't disagree, you can't voice your disagreement, or you can't mock or satirize.

>Satirizing that USA Today award is not intolerant of their speech, because it is not calling for or taking action against an individual or group and their right or ability to speak.

Does that mean that you would consider mocking Jewish beliefs and calling them lies to be tolerant because it isn't calling for action against Jewish people? If not, how is it different from mocking Levine's identity?

> People who believe sex and gender are the same and trans is a mental illness can be made subject to harassment by people who argue against them or mock them in public too.

True, but that is the paradox of tolerance. No one cares what your personal definition is if you keep it to yourself. Those people will only get met with intolerance when they voice their own intolerance.
So what kind of experiment do you run to capture that dissatisfaction? Doesn’t have to be a/b. Just anything qualitative that doesn’t boil down to making decisions purely based on feelings.
They probably got the title from copying the visible heading on the page, which includes the "Show image caption" icon.

The removal of "known" is probably a result of "Caring for the only known full kākāpō feather cloak in the world Show image caption" being too long for an HN title.
If one employee quitting takes out your whole team, the problem isn't the employee that quit. Something is seriously wrong with your working environment and the whole thing was balanced on a knife edge.

> In tech, it is relatively easy for an employee to hedge against getting fired. It is a well paid job, in high demand.

I have a friend who several years ago who was laid off with 3 months severance. They left feeling cheerful, telling people that if they couldn't find a job in 3 months, they deserved to be fired. Fortunately it only took slightly longer than 3 months and it's something we can laugh about now. The whole "it'll be easy to find a job with this skill-set" is true right up until it's not and is a risky backup plan.
>This is why it's crazy the Fed is trying to tank the economy the same time Congress is trying to do a CHIPS act. Crazy!

Aren't these on wildly different timelines? Anything created in the CHIPS act won't be cranking out chips for 5 or even 10 years, right? But inflation corrections can happen in a year or two.

The CHIPS act is almost like insurance, in my opinion. If everything goes great in the future we don't need the CHIPS act and it retroactively feel kind of silly. But if something goes wrong (not necessarily human made decisions, an earthquake in the right place...) we'll be glad we could have a softer landing.
I still have my Wii U plugged in and while that may be true, they made up for it by never charging for online service. No-charge access to Mario Kart 8 multiplayer has been great.
Must we pursue this path of suicide? Oh, well, I will make sure I enjoy my life as much as I can. We may be the last generation to enjoy life at all.
If you have the opportunity, Dinosaur national monument in Utah is well worth the visit.

They have an exposed fossil bearing rockface that you can get very close to, and you can see how the fossils differ from the surrounding stone.
I think it's a joke, but it's the internet, so Poe's Law applies.
Let’s revisit this comment in 5 years.
This trend of browsers to increasingly lie to me about what I'm looking at is infuriating.
Caddy is your friend here https://caddyserver.com/docs/automatic-https
I worked with a cyber ML team one time that explained that management wanted some kind of threat detection model to run in-line with only enough cases left at the end for a small team of human analysts. The math was bleak (I don't remember all the details, but it's something like this):

- The humans could handle about 1000 events per day across the team.

- The system received around 100 million events per day.

- This meant that something like a 99.999% (5-nines!) true positive rate was the target goal.

But management poured millions into the team over the years because somebody had come to believe that the machines could handle 100% of the challenge and had gone to some AI conferences and become a true believer.

The correct approach was team the analysts and the machines together in more effective ways (triage, enrichment, context providers, etc), and the correct goal was to focus on improving the results of the joint system over just the human team, not reach for absolute perfection. Triage, and accepting that sometimes shit gets through and use good practices like layered defense, n-factor auth, and zero-trust systems would carry the day.

I remember the presentation where the new head of the cyber team explained that it's acceptable for trojans that target Windows 98 to get through as they had no vulnerable systems the trojan could exploit -- the entire company was MacOS and Linux. You would have thought heads would have fallen off of the executives.
It helps because you don’t have to wait on another person who may or may not be busy doing something else. I can scan the code while my wife grabs the kid, and I can double tap to pay while walking out the door.
Looks like it's back online, anon.
It's quite literary the embodiment of statistical probabilities in this corpus of texts. So you have to start with a rather massive corpus and the complexities found in this corpus will define the complexities possibly found in the model.
What do you need a septic system for in suburban Seattle?
They may already have access to it, or some subset of it. You might not share all of it for various reasons, including not wanting to just dump years of photos on them that they have no interest in.

That access might go away though and they might need information about how certain bits of that information are stored, and what they need to do in order to preserve it.
Nothing is automatic about this process. It is fairly common for calls to or from ported numbers not even to be connected if one of the ends is currently at some obscure small-time carrier. Failure of e.g. caller ID is even more common.
Ah, you mean the Voynich Manuscript!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voynich_manuscript
this is not just source code, it is much better to be called magic.

also love the story behind it.
Absolutely. Yield is obviously a big part of cost-per-die, but it's not just defect density related. When a node is first released, the process is not as well controlled so you end up with yield loss because the process doesn't match the models (in the extremes) and dies fail at various testing stages. This obviously gets better over time, but it's still a major issue for companies designing in the latest technologies. Anecdotally I'd say there's a ~3X reduction in the "sigma" of the process over 3-5yrs.

Of course these issues have always existed, but wafer costs have never been so high, and yields never so low (both because of increased defect density and worse process control with new transistors).
That's a short time horizon.

Innovation hubs have been in China, Middle East, Venice, London, etc.

The printing innovation lasted around 300 years. Steam engine another 150 years. The industrial revolution less than 100.

How long do you think computers will dominate major innovation? And if it does, will the innovation hub stay in SV ?

What happens if biotech takes over? MRNA tech ? Driverless cars ? VTOL ? Rocketry or Space Tourism ? ML or low-code apps changing the dev of software as we know it today ?

Do you see any of those hubs in SV ? Are they in SV today ?
ISBNs are supposed to be unique, but they aren't. Publishers reuse ISBNs, by mistake if they are following the rules, or sometimes intentionally.

It's not super common, but common enough that I ran across that problem when scanning in my bookshelf years ago.
>Exactly. If God told you to do it, it must be okay.

Okay, so, now that we've established that it's okay as long as god said so, how do we handle those people that said "god told me to do it"? What evidence that god actually did the commanding? Do we look for burning bushes? Do we look out for a pillar fire hanging out by the temple? Oh, right, that was old testament stuff. We're clearly in the new testament stuff, so gonna need some examples of proof of work on that voice in the head being the actual god that it has been established as being okay to say murder someone(s).
> GMail isn't biased towards/away from Republicans. The users receiving those messages are training the spam filter to dislike their messages.

i think this highlights an interesting dynamic we’re seeing pretty often lately, groups are trying to force their beliefs and the recipients are saying “i’m not at all interested.”

it really seems reminiscent to what i’ve read about the 60s-90s religious groups where these groups were trying to force their personal religious beliefs onto society.

these groups are now suing to use government force to force companies to force their views onto all of us.

again:

> GMail isn't biased towards/away from Republicans. The users receiving those messages are training the spam filter to dislike their messages.
They’re referring to a level IV or V system. They’re used when the ground doesn’t perc well.
Yes, people are still using Twitter. TikTok is a very different thing, it's not a replacement for Twitter.
Amdahl’s law is also just a conjecture unless you have a proof that P is disjoint from NC
You are admitting to your disbelief that a person born with his background can do such a thing, and that’s kind of silly unless you say more.
I like markup over WYSIWYG because I can use my preferred text editor, can be version controlled, reused in multiple places (reddit, github, etc).

I like that the markup I use (Markdown) is readable as is, but I wouldn't mind losing a bit of readability for more features.
I still don’t have Uber figured out. I had their app in my phone for years. When I tried to use it I discovered I’d been shadow banned and every attempt to use the platform ends in an error just before a driver is assigned. Same result with Uber eats and postmates.

Sometimes I contemplate getting a job at Uber just so I can figure out why I’m banned then quitting.
It’s probably something dumb like a transposed digit or they banned the previous person to have this number - everyone on earth has a unique phone number that doesn’t change their entire lives, right? Wrong.
I don't know how Musk expects to sell the Twitter subscription for account verification at the same time as heavily reducing or removing the ability to enforce content.

These things may not seem fully related, but they're important to stop things like Bitcoin scams, brigading and harassment. These are all things that'll cause people to leave the platform and fast, not to mention run quickly afoul of hate speech laws in other countries.
Surprised Smokey Yunick's name isn't mentioned anywhere.

Reminds me of this entertaining seminar[1] of a bunch of old school IMSA racers describing how they got "creative" racing around the rules to gain an unfair advantage.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfq7-1ePW-M
Same here. Your comment convinced me to click, no regrets. :D
The one at the house I lived at a year ago was essentially a big container in the ground, having been there about a decade+ just doing its thing. We just had to be real careful not to use bleach/sodium percarbonate/etc so not to kill everything living in it. This is in Colorado.
Some threads from the journalists involved:

>Some still have full access but it’s a small group ~30. The company did this to keep employees from doing something unexpected given the Musk transition (the app code base was also frozen, e.g.)

>But with US election a week away some T&S folks worry they can’t do their job

>One other small but important note: Musk seems very interested in two specific policies:

>1. The general misinfo policy, which he feels is too broad

>2. A “hateful conduct” policy about targeting transgender people by misgendering or deadnaming

>He wants both to be reviewed

https://twitter.com/KurtWagner8/status/1587257843060641792

>A wide swath of Twitter's trust & safety team had access to content moderation/enforcement tools frozen last week. Usually, hundreds of people on the team could remove posts w/misinfo, hate speech etc. It's now down to 15 people.

https://twitter.com/jackiedavalos1/status/158726094893871923...

>People who were on call to enforce Twitter’s policies during Brazil’s election did get access to the internal tools on Sunday, but in a limited capacity, according to our sources.

>No one had access during the surge in hate speech on the platform Fri/Sat

>Twitter declined comment for our story.

https://twitter.com/daveyalba/status/1587260390165123074
You can just give them your hard drive, why bother with the account?
You have a very diverse group of friends!
Is it not good practice to scuttle equipment at sea to encourage the habitat for sealife? I thought we --countries who do this-- often do it to provide marine habitat.
>There's something they have to change to turn on IPv6 for your area, whether it's swapping a CMTS or updating an IPAM database or whatever, and that change costs both time and money so Spectrum is gradually rolling it out across the network.

That's a plausible hypothesis.

Another one is that Spectrum likes the revenue it can generate from the scarcity of IPv4 addresses, especially with a captive market who can't (for the same reasons I mentioned WRT IPv6[0]) get their own IPv4 allocation.

Renting out a few million static IP addresses at $5 a pop is pure profit.

But you may well be right.

But from my perspective it's a distinction without a difference.

[0] https://www.arin.net/resources/guide/ipv6/first_request/#end...
Well, Deep Blue did.
This is not a mystery. 2022 is the peak year of retirement for the large baby boomer generation. People approaching retirement are at their most skilled and thus most highly productive. As they retire the average age and hence average skill level drops. I suspect if you separated the statistics into blue collar jobs and white collar jobs, the blue collar worker output began dropping a decade ago as the boomers aged out of their physical fitness prime.
I'm just tired of seeing the same low effort comments on HN when a given topic comes up.

Google => when will they cancel this?

Meta => metaverse what a joke

Etc...
Just to be blunt about it, the people whose opinions matter are obsessed with Twitter, not TikTok.
So what is the proper course of action for a situation where treatment leads to instantaneous failure and status quo does not?
Reverse Polish Lisp (on the HP 49G) for starters.

The basic Haskell function definition,

factorial 0 = 1
factorial n = n * factorial (n - 1)
Elon Musk’s Disastrous Weekend on Twitter
You're preaching to the choir. I wish he'd think a bit more before tweeting, because I know what he says can have consequences.

However, that doesn't mean I have to interpret his tweets in the worst possible way, or that I can't remind other people of basic principles of civility.
I think communication about technical topics has greatly improved. Opportunities have opened up for those who are better at writing than speaking. When speaking is required, meetings tend to be shorter and less exhausting. Productivity is about the same or better.

On the other hand, it took a while for it to not instinctively feel like punishment. My coping strategy was improving my living space and meeting up exclusively with people that aren't my coworkers.

Overall, I think this is the best thing that ever happened to me. While uncomfortable at first, my quality of life has dramatically improved. I still feel lonely most of the time, but it's easier to see why now that I have more control over my time and physical presence.
How do heif/heic/av1 compare (I no longer understand whether we’re referring to codec or extension :) )?
Maybe it could be - by something else that already has a large network. Facebook, say, could add a "tweet-like" feature.
There's a similar hoax in the Turtle Mountains in North Dakota. It seemed to me like a thing for white people to say "we were here first"

https://www.walkermn.com/news/chapter-693-vikings-in-the-tur...

https://sites.google.com/site/stonebankorg/fabulous-nd/moori...

https://www.dmr.nd.gov/ndgs/ndnotes/ndn17_h.htm
I use lists to avoid algorithmic sort, promotional tweets, etc.
I think OP and you can both be right.

Twitter may shrink and even disappear in 5 years.

But that doesn't mean it will be ever be replaced by any 1 thing.
>Is there any market segment they are currently competitive in?

Intel is winning mainstream CPUs right now. Partly because AMD priced their new chips too high at launch, and partly because total system cost for AMD is higher because the motherboards were also more expensive, and you had to use more expensive DDR5.

AMD has been cutting prices, motherboards are getting cheaper, and DDR5 memory is falling. So the difference is less and less. But for the last year or so Intel was best choice for a new system, though the AMD 5800X3D was solid as a pure gaming value build. (Still is, actually.)

I am actually a little confused how Intel fabs can be considered far behind TSMC but their desktop consumer CPUs have been better or at least roughly equal to AMD in the last year. Is Intel just making lower profit margins and eating the cost to compete?
Unlike the Staples - Office Depot merger, about which I couldn't care less, or a tech giant stifling smaller competition by buying it:

These are two giants in a very small oligopoly. I can't see any consumer benefit to a merger, and lots of potential for harm. This is what antitrust law is supposed to be all about.

I suppose you could argue they're in a declining business and need to cut costs. But I don't think either would admit to that.
How can you see subpixel rendering in a screenshot? I don’t think that’s possible.
It's a log scale graph, it shows a doubling. The performance just isn't increasing as fast as it was before.
Really cool facility. Thanks for posting.
"works at most once per car" is a caveat that should give you pause before concluding "it's not stupid." :)
I mean, NYT also is telling us that lace is in style for men right now sooo if you have to ditch the sweatpants for the office maybe consider a lace overcoat? https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/31/style/mens-wear-lace-fash...
To be fair to the rest of us, this has to be balanced against any detrimental effect longtermist plans would have on long-term survival on Earth. A .002% chance of making it to the stars probably isn't worth a 4% lower chance of keeping Earth habitable.
And before video games… Senna ‘91 win in brazil F1… 7 laps stuck on the 6th gear https://www.ayrton-senna-dasilva.com/brazil-1991/ on the «Senna» documentary he even says that on the last laps he had an out of the body experience, watching himself and the car from the top.
It wouldn't even have to be a language model, just some sort of meta program that handled the switchboarding, as it were, between subsystems would be enough. But my real point is just more narrow, you can't measure progress to artificial general intelligence with a list of tasks satisfied by artificial specific intelligence. You have to measure the generalness directly. And thats also why I don't think you'd have to fulfill the list. Plenty of people suck at poker and golf and talking philosophy. People mistake the generalness of AGI for something like 'smarter than humans' but it's totally reasonable for there to be an artificial general intelligence which sucks at chess, just like a lot of people.
I think a these countries would also benefit greatly from support to deploy nuclear energy.
Leaving your phone charged for extended amount of time like this is really bad though. The battery will swell (fire hazzard), it's just a matter of time when. Sometimes you're lucky and it took a year or more for the battery to swell, sometimes it swells just after a few month. The compromise is probably put the phone in a fireproof surface instead of a drawer.
The Future of Art Censorship Is Being Decided Without Artists
The Kickstarter iOS Swift code also used this, from what I remember. It was my first time ever seeing something like it, so I was also mindblown.
I wasn't discussing what the legal basis of RIPE is anywhere. Nor does anyone else appear to be.
Libressl is not vulnerable to the upcoming [OpenSSL 3.0 November first] issue
Splatoon made me sad that you couldn't do 2-player co-op online with the gamepad and TV. That felt like a big miss.
I think the "blue check" verification on Twitter is its most powerful asset. The most important people in the world (culture icons, heads of state & companies, and subject matter experts) congregate there to share their thoughts.

Personally I think Twitter would work best if it was left to be just that. I don't think anyone really cares about what I have to say, for example. I'm just some random guy who works at a software company, and just being honest I don't believe that I have contributed anything super valuable to the world thus far. If I do, maybe I become someone important in my field or part of launching some important project/company, then maybe I could be invited to Twitter. Kind of like those high end credit cards that one has to be invited to based on their income/asset level.

Then again, I have no idea how that would make money (besides showing ads to followers like me) so I'm back to just following those important people for now lol. No way I'm paying money to view twitter, I'm cutting down on how much I spend on these monthly subscription services.
I don't think it's a fantasy, it's just that organic solutions like religions or societal norms take a long time to develop and that development is damn messy.
It's not (only) artificial intelligence we're after, it's artificial consciousness.

As noted in this article, machines already outperform humans at many tasks that humans solve with intelligence. Every year, there are new breakthroughs in that direction, and the list of tasks that humans can do better than machines is rapidly shrinking. We're well on our way to solving artificial intelligence.

So why does it feel like there has been no meaningful progress at all?

Because intelligence and consciousness are different things. What we're really looking for is a machine that, like a human, decides on its own which problems to solve, and solves them without needing to be specifically directed to do so. A machine that produces not only results that its creators asked for, but entirely new ones that are not in any obvious way related to its input and programming.

It appears to me that the entire field of AI research is utterly confused about this elementary distinction.
ELI5: Why zig matters, while we already have rust, python, JavaScript and Go?
As an additional option, if you use the Android/Google Messages app, you can link another device/laptop and any communications are bounced through Google's cloud, but End-to-End encrypted. I use this all the time from my tablet I take into the Data Center, and frequently leave my phone upstairs. Keeps support for RCS as well.

Additionally, you can also use Google Fi, which supports the same messages app, and syncing the messages and responses like Apple's iMessage, just by logging into your Google Account after a little setup. I believe it's also intercepted upstream, and isn't reliant on another device being powered on.

Disc: Googler, not on Messages.