skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You also have it backwards. The post is positing the for-cause firings and the supposed 25% layoffs as separate events.
not how monopolies work
> I meant a cost function that the model trains on. The expert can look at the cost function to double-check whether the inputs are appropriate.

Okay, but how is the expert going to judge that the outputs of the model are appropriate? What techniques do they use?
These outright lies need to be downvoted. Horrible conspiracy theories spewed by the far-right. Easily debunked since the defendant has already admitted to his crimes and official police sources have submitted their statements.

https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2022-10-3...
There are lots of new EHRs being approved. Just go look on CHPL and you can see that there are a 100 new EHRs that have made it through the 2015 Cures Update certification. Its hard and expensive but it can be done as I can attest to getting our product certified just this year.
In Gran Turismo Sport it'll most likely just earn you a penalty, but it can be advantageous under certain circumstances.

https://youtu.be/xK3NabIdk60?t=1022
You do realize state actors include the IRS, the FBI on a fishing expedition for a crime that occurred near your house, being framed for a crime because you look similar, false DNA matches, etc, right? All of these things are non-zero, and significantly above non-zero that everyone and their grandmother should consider it. Unfortunately, pandora's box opened with Snowden. We are all targets. The only difference is what degree of a target you've made yourself. If you work in tech, you're already high on a priority target list somewhere.
Of course! I will be more than happy to hear real demands!
The one in the link by OP is the official Nitter instance.

LibRedirect won't help in this case, unless you enable the option "Auto-redirect offline instances to online ones" which is turned off by default.
Not exactly that but I've been working on a collection of small but meaningful programs in major languages: github.com/eatonphil/tinyprograms. There's Zig, Rust, Go, Python, D, FreePascal, Java, Ruby, etc.
I've had to provide them for all job searches I've done (Silicon Valley).
Interventions that reduce partisan vitriol don’t help democracy
We did the same thing in the healthcare sector, but for safety event reporting! It's not like we even did anything groundbreaking with UX. One was just making it so it's easy to fill out a form quickly. You don't even have to touch the mouse if you don't want to. Users love it and it's increased event reporting by a good percentage.
What's his code volume in the past 60 days?
ClockworkPi last week https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33331139
The Humane Interface by Jef Raskin
It happened to me, too, about twelve hours ago. I had just sent a request to follow a musician’s private account, something I’ve never done before. I then received a notice that my account had been permanently suspended for violating community guidelines. I went through a few steps to protest that suspension, including replying with codes sent to my e-mail address and phone. There was no immediate response from Instagram, but when I checked a few minutes ago the app was working for me again.

I haven’t posted anything to Instagram in several years, but I do follow a few dozen accounts of friends and of people producing content of interest to me. I thought it strange that Instagram’s AI would suspend my account for such innocuous behavior—I even click on ads occasionally—but there seems to have been a wider glitch.
That's what they said about libra, about marketplace, about...
You are still discussing in a hypothetical situation that most people can have a consensus about the information eventually. i.e. the information (If the FIRE really happened or not) can be falsified.

What really caused conflicts and damage are the situations the "lies" cannot be falsified (just in current population due the the limit of intelligence, no necessary for smart people in future generations), and the yeller is not a typical liar but belong to a special specie (majority of politicians who have good skill in elections) that totally believe their lies so there's no legal ground base to charge them. There have been already a lot of damaging consequences and seems continue to have more because of this.

Do we have reverse yellers yelling "NO FIRE" to balance the ongoing damages? The are very few for some important issues. There's no way to counter balance.

Why? It's not because there are less people know the truth. In real world it's not a clear cut model that information can be passed back and forth independently between a yeller and audience. The misinformation exists because there are eager misinformation consumers. There are a very large portion of people need the yelling of "FIRE" and hence there are more "FIRE" yellers. This is another discrepancy between your model and real world.
Isn’t this basically the plug-in API that allowed custom HTML renderers that were basically Flash and Silverlight and was vehemently rejected?

In modern terms this is basically Flutter. Combine Flutter with Microsoft Blazor and I think that fully describes your idea.
What makes you think that RFK was substantially different from LBJ or any of the other Democrats at the time?
Each simultaneous call costs you ~100Kbps. An SMS is 140 bytes, and limited by desired SMS throughput. I use a T-Mobile femtocell with a SpaceX Dishy, but VSAT (64 Kbps up to 8 Mbps) should be fine for SMS only.

https://explorersweb.com/starlink-in-antarctica/

McMurdo could run their own BTS and provide SMS access only to mobile phones if the desire and funding was available. This would give you a legit mobile network registration.

http://openbts.org/

https://www.theverge.com/2022/10/6/23389641/ukama-open-sourc...
Not saying he would buy it and sign an agreement
There is actually a lot of knowledge that's been built that shows many effects of inequality on societies. It might not seem obvious but inequality is actually a big driving factor in people's feelings of dissatisfaction in their everyday lives.

But to argue the point a bit more, and this is something that Thomas Piketty (an economist that studies inequality) always brings in his books: one measure is not enough. GDP is one measure, we need to look at many more measures. GDP does say something, it's not meaningless, but we need other measurements to get the full understanding of the picture.

And we actually have lots of them, GDP sadly fails to capture a lot of externalities, so it doesn't really capture very well for example environmental damage; think of china, their GDP is growing a lot but we can all see it's not growing in a sustainable manner. Or think of the USA, highest GDP in the planet but this isn't being reflected in life expectancy for example which actually has been declining for a while now.

And as I said in the beginning, inequality very much affects people's well being and the well being of an economy as a whole as well. So it is definitely a measurement that we ought to take seriously. It seems silly to me to say "these are left wing metric". These are metrics that have a reason of being, inequality has real effects on our economies and there is a lot of work, and good work at that, that you can read on why precisely this is the case.
> Fact checking creates a history of this which should feature into algorithms.

At first glance, it looks like you've just re-defined the problem from "platforms should decide which posts are true" to "fact checkers should decide which posts are true", but actually I think you might be onto something.

Platforms could use their existing user-reporting features, and measures of audience size, to inform fact checkers about which posts are the most controversial; then different fact checkers could (reactively) investigate the claims and offer rulings that would appear as a banner over the relevant post.

The missing pieces of the puzzle are that individual users should be able to opt in to one or more fact checker, and platforms should give users a default set of fact checkers, and the fact checkers should be funded by a 1% tax on platforms' revenue (split in proportion to the popularity of those fact checkers among users).

This could actually be a valuable and viable system, and maybe the sciences could also benefit from a system like this for flagging suspect papers and paying for researchers to attempt to reproduce results. It could even be gamified, with researchers winning "points" for correctly guessing which studies have non-reproducible results (as long as these points didn't have financial incentives attached which could corrupt them).
The author's arguments depend entirely on a religion's views of the purpose of life and the afterlife:

"The overwhelming majority of pro-life advocates are religious, and many of those are Christians who hold the following beliefs:

There exists a morally perfect, all-knowing, and all-powerful god who created our universe.

Restricting abortions ought to be a top social and political priority.

Embryos and fetuses that die all go to hell for eternity, or they all go to heaven for eternity."

Why do Judeo-Christian religions prohibit murder? ("Thou shalt not kill")

Many religions say that the times when a person should be born and when a person should die are up to God's purposes and plan for that person. By this reckoning a murder causes a person to die BEFORE the time that God appointed for them to die.

In a similar way, many religions view abortion as a form of murder--killing a person before they were born and outside of God's plan for that person. The afterlife fate of a murdered person regardless of how they were murdered would be up to God's judgement. To try to declare what God's judgement for a murdered person would be as justification for their murder would be both arrogant and evil.
He is slowed, but the other drivers are slowed more by the need to keep traction in the turn.
how is it a correction? the main controversy was the 10x and 700x faster thing... the 0.01s thing was just a typo really
https://archive.ph/vneN0
However modern foam pads were a prerequisite. If you Fosbury flop into sawdust and sand your career won’t last long.
> There are plenty of high skilled people who have been blown away by an offer they thought was incredibly generous, only to discover they were actually lowballed.

Been there done that - Not incredibly low balled. But probably 10%. But as you learn the industry, have a network of former coworkers who don’t mind sharing salaries and external recruiters, it gets easier and you just job hop. This is mostly on the enterprise/Corp dev side of development where most developers work.

It’s quite easy to find out compensation for the larger more well known tech companies at places like levels.fyi.

Before anyone thinks I’m putting down “enterprise developers”, that’s what I did my entire career from 1996-2020.

For all intents and purposes, that’s still what I do. I now also write a shit ton of yaml, HCL, PowerPoint slides, and PRFAQs at $BigTech and “consult”.
I've not done an in-depth analysis but I don't think longjmp is as performant as pushing (and updating) the return stack. Maybe you could do it with assign to our variable + jmp.
Thanks to Haskell's laziness, the following implementation of `minimum` is O(n):

import Data.List (sortBy)

minimum :: Ord a => [a] -> a
minimum = head . sortBy compare

`sortBy` is O(n log n). But `head` only needs the first element which can be found in linear time. So `sortBy` does not compute the rest and `minimum` is O(n).
Can I get the Cliff's Notes of this?
Growing up in LA in the 90s, there was an astonishing variety of independent coffee houses, each themed their own way. The owners weren't making much money, they just liked having their hangout spaces. Van Gogh's Ear was art themed; Anastasia's Asylum rag rolled red with live singer songwriters; Cacao was tiki-meets-UFO: Stir Crazy was themed like a woodsy cabin; a place I don't remember the name of was like walking into an underground moonbase. There were dozens more. All gone. Dead as the late night politically engaged, literate, poetic, artistic and musical youth culture that supported them. They were places teenagers could go. Having worked the all-night shift at one after high school and served the employees of the new Starbucks across the street when it opened, I made a few observations about the death of all that.

It wasn't laptops. People had those. Kids came and did their homework and hung out. A bigger deal was the smoking ban. That kneecapped them because all the underage kids went to these places to smoke cigarettes and feel like grown-ups. The rents all went up to the point where they couldn't survive. But the real ending was when socialization moved online. Sitting around a coffee place meeting new people just isn't done in America anymore. Coffee houses are purely workspaces now, and it doesn't matter for that purpose if they're all the same.

What socializing there is moved to bars, where alcohol makes it easier. But the first question now is always "what do you do?" It's a shame. People are thinking like tinder robots instead of actually getting into conversations about stuff.

The reason the coffeehouses died is that American-style global culture has no room for, and actively discourages unmediated and spontaneous social interaction. You can't monetize it on any kind of large scale, and it may be politically dangerous. This is actually why I live in Portland and love it... it's one of the last hold-outs.

[edit] final thought: The larger trend of homogenization is something I've started calling a "change in the texture of the world" in the past decade. Many of the efficiencies are sold as improvements, but they diminish the lived experience of encountering the world, and the serendipity and uniqueness of one's life in it. A soulless, fully automated utopia leaves no room for aesthetic, intellectual or emotional diversity and strangles personal growth. The lack of differences between places eliminates the grounds on which to discover personal preferences.
Pushing all computations and interactions to the cloud has a number of downsides. Realistically, most sites would turn into a instant-rendering battery-saving untrackable privacy-respecting distraction-free ads for their own app.
On Guam there is no birdsong, you cannot imagine the trauma of a silent island
The python code for a NN to learn addition.

I know it seems trivial, but back then, it seemed everybody talked about it, there was that coursera course about driving car, the self promotion of towarddatascience.com, video on youtube... but not a single line of code which made sense.

I mean : "Shut the fuck up and show me the actual code !".

I finally found it on github.

I was like : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYHJRhRym1U
How can you be a “superstar” who kept up with relevant industry trends and not keep up with compensation trends?
The OPs example blows my mind but not in the way originally intended. Wow, it managed to make a trivial constant-time operation into an exponential-time operation. This is a mind-blowingly bad example of recursion.

It's like trying to enter a house by demolishing it and rebuilding it around you instead of opening the door and walking in.
You missed privacy. The user lost privacy with webapps.
Somewhat related: I read into the case about a year ago and was shocked at how little coverage there is. There isn’t even a dedicated Wikipedia article — there’s only a one paragraph summary on the general article “Sudden Unintended acceleration” that covers all causes and prominent cases. 89 people died, and Toyota knew about the problem for years! Not only did they not do anything, they hid it. I just don’t get why more people didn’t talk about it. It’s not like it all happened in the distant past — Toyota was fined by Justice dept in 2014!
How does this work with color profiles?

(As I understand it – and this is not much –, libjxl returns a bitmap and an ICC profile, which then has to be matched against the color space of the display. How is this going to work in a WASM decoder inside the browser? Or does it just render in sRGB, hoping for the best?)
I think it has to be mountain biking. It's the perfect thought to have in your head when you're looking at something that is potentially crazy, but you know the laws of physics are almost certainly going to have your back as long as your technique is good.

First time I heard it I was near the bottom of the UC Santa Cruz trails into Highway 9 contemplating this section called "the poop chute" which gets steeper and rockier until you hit a 2-3 foot drop among boulders and the only solution is to have enough speed that you end up in the road. And by "the road" I mean the apex of a blind hairpin turn of Highway 9.

I had been out of the sport for 20 years but kept riding road and my buddy got me back in with a sweet deal on a YT Jeffsy we kitted up with spare parts from all his friends. Carbon everything. A bike that did not exist in any dimension when I stopped riding.

Well, this was probably my seventh or eighth weekend trying to negotiate this chute and there are these 17-20 year old kids at the top and I ask them how to do this. And this guy, with all the confidence of Santa Cruz and youth says, with a big, easy grin, "Yeah, it's just hang way back and full send." And I looked at him. And I looked at the chute. And back at him. And my brain, married with two kids, was like "I see. Ok." And I did it.

Full send. Was exactly what my brain needed to think. It works weirdly well.
That's called employment-population ratio and it is tracked by the BLS. It's actually a bit more valuable to track prime age employment-population ratio to factor out students and retirees. But it's still a broad indicator.
Put a more negative way, but perhaps more funny: "Given the opportunity gamers will optimize fun out of a game."
If your camera has focus peaking and zoom in mode it is. If you don't know how shallow the DoF is and get things out of focus elsewhere in the picture, that's your problem. Don't shoot at f/1.4 then.
Border Width can be changed through registry or 3rd party tools, I forgot their names but should be easy find.
The Super Bowl in 2013 featured an intentional safety. Losing points but running the clock down. The play was predicted by one attendee at the party I was at —- a British gentleman whose introduction to football had been the Madden games.
...given that a ruling can go one of two ways, either for or against the plaintiff, this is in fact a remarkable success rate. By choosing the opposite of whatever you predict, someone else could accurately predict the outcome of a case 90% of the time!
> Panic buying of paper towels early on in the pandemic, as an example, was not predictable.

What? It was entirely predictable, except maybe for those high-end executives who live in hotels and/or with full-time house service, and are thus completely detached from life of ordinary people.

The panic buying was limited to the most obvious category of goods: basic consumables with some degree of shelf life, prioritized by survival and then comfort. This means food (particularly canned, shelf-stable, or freezable - plus baby food and pet food - and ingredients, including flour, yeast and baking soda), hygiene (soap, toilet paper!, and - perhaps specific to pandemic - hand sanitizers and masks), fuel, household cleaning (including cleaning agents and, surprise surprise, paper towels), comfort consumables (coffee).

It's not hindsight on my part - think of how people individually decided what to buy. They didn't buy whatever they see everyone else buying. They just asked themselves: what do I eat? How do I keep myself and the household clean? What else do I buy on a regular basis? What do I need to maintain a semblance of my current lifestyle? The answers, prioritized, were what everyone then went to stock up on.
> With your logic, you can say that we can make static image with same results with any sensor.

We can't do that because of lenses and diffraction, but that's different from being able to avoid exposure and sensor noise issues. You can in fact avoid those with more sampling.
Uh, which engineers are you referring to?
Boris and Jacob strike me as politicians that understand how to play the UK system masterfully.

Doubt either of them are the solution for the country but neither is anyone in labour.

The corruption precedes them by centuries, and anyone who tries to fix things - like remove the special status of the City of London now will get a shorten career.

Kinda like in the US to even have a chance to be the presidential candidate, you need the monetary support of several billionaires.
It should be noted that European unions were no less militant originally. Being militant (and strong enough) is what gets you concessions - including better arrangements for future deals.
KDE isn't perfect but it's nice. GNOME is like some project that wanted to be like the Mac but nobody ever used it, they just saw pictures of it and they worked off that.
Viking runes found in Oklahoma?
To add to the other replies, there's two etymologies that I know of.

The first and most common explanation, is that when a film crew working with an extreme sports athlete would successfully capture a moment on film, they would mail the tape in to the film editor or marketing department - literally send the tape. So when they were doing lots of takes, before rolling the cameras everyone would encourage each other to "send it this time".

(The term "beta" referring to detailed description of a location or technique, came about similarly, as it refers to passing around a literal Betamax tape of another person performing that stunt or rock climb)

The alternate explanation is that it is simply short for "ascend", as in exhorting a rock climber to "ascend it".
It seems like it coincided with differences in attitude about education. I’ve forgotten the exact stats, but in decades past college students overwhelming said the purpose of college was to develop a philosophy of life whereas now the predominant answer is to find a good job.
> In truth, pretty much nobody really knows for sure what policies actually will increase GDP [...]

Increase GDP?
What if the real long term prospect is incredibly cheap energy?
have you tried watching BTCC/British Touring Car Championship? it's a lot of inches-apart racing with a lot of actual contact and some incredibly skilled drivers. can be quite thrilling!
> Plenty of monitors with higher dynamic range than sRGB

Being P3 (WCG) doesn't mean it's also HDR or that it's calibrated well or that the display software is handling it.

> And if you have a still subject, any serious camera will allow you to do bracketing so you can combine shots.

So you can combine them how into what? There's no good software for it. HDR combining software typically creates SDR images, not eg EXR files, and it usually looks bad doing it.

> and plenty of people take pictures to print them

What's that got to do with HDR?? Surely reflective media has less dynamic range than transmissive media…
Exactly! Metrics aren't a problem, it is when they become targets (Goodhart's Law). It is when they become the primary focus instead of a useful tool in a whole toolchest.

> All metrics of scientific evaluation are bound to be abused. Goodhart's law [...] states that when a feature of the economy is picked as an indicator of the economy, then it inexorably ceases to function as that indicator because people start to game it.

— Mario Biagioli

We see Goodhart's playing out all throughout our society. Thus our duty is to add nuance to the conversation and speak as experts. Because experts can see through the measures, understanding their limitations but also what they are good at too. It is also our duty to recognize the limitations of our own knowledge and to not perpetuate this system. To not look down on others that acknowledge their limits, but to hold them with regard. To replace the fear of not knowing with the gleeful pursuit of finding the answer.