skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> why?

If you have E2EE but then one the two ends can be substituted for a new one, does it really qualifies as E2EE?
If I have a hard requirement on E2EE, it probably means I don't want encrypted messages stored forever on remote servers, and easily decrypted on new devices.
Or it can also mean I don't really understand what encryption mean, and I'm only interested in having a nice looking lock icon next to my messages.

>> If I sent encrypted messages to a trusted device of yours, I suppose I don't really want any new device of yours to get these messages.
> I actually do
> I am sure I do want E2EE.

Then what you are looking for is opengpg-type encryption (which is available via XMPP's most popular clients too). It's a lot less convenient to set up but this is how you switch from "device key" to "personal key".

> I have to also trust the servers of all my contacts. Where did I imply that?

Where did I imply that? I just gave you an example use case that is generally not tagged as E2EE but where no one but you and your contact can read your messages (self hosting).

> being able to read my messages on all my devices?

I can read all my OMEMO encrypted messages on all my devices. If I use a new device, I cannot read history. But that's because OMEMO isn't just for show (the nice lock icon), but actually something that makes it nearly impossible for anyone but you or your communication partner to read what you exchanged.

Also, most XMPP clients also allow to export local history, which could then be imported again, so if keeping all chat history really matters to you, it's also possible. But again, if you plan to store messages forever, you increase the chance of it being read by third parties significantly.

> safe from anyone being able to read my messages except me and my communication partners

If that is all that matters to you, facebook messenger has E2EE and it should suit your needs. It has the nice lock icon you're looking for.
I think that who you talk to and how often you do is also rather important for privacy concerns, that's why I self host my XMPP server.

You seem to like the matrix protocol, where even if you self host, a lot of data is sent to the mother ship, cf https://hackea.org/notas/matrix.html
How is this better than the Stripe Terraform provider? https://registry.terraform.io/providers/franckverrot/stripe/...
> Where did you get that?

All autocratic regimes - and make no mistake: ecologist politicians ultimately must be, for the common citizenry will always work towards their own goals, which are incompatible with ecological goals - want to limit mobility and thus the right of assembly for their subjects. Subjects with limited mobility can't cause trouble. Ecologist politicians will sell it to the general public as not travelling being eco-friendly, and thus mandatory.

See: GDR's de-facto crippling of individual car ownership, Chinese Hukou system, the Soviet Passport Statute.
I do open source on Github and I believe both are totally fine.
With the examples that we're seeing, the images were in the training set.
> Here's a live demo hot from 1986: https://youtu.be/-J_xL4IGhJA?t=2416

The process in the video still perfectly aligns with my description. Actually, I reached that conclusion by observing people writing Lisp code. That is, when you're writing Lisp code, that's exactly what people next you would see, no matter what you think.

Also, trailing ")"s are clearly a burden, as people do spend their brain cycles to properly match them.

> It isn't. You're not the type of person who lisp is for

You sound like you're right in the middle of Lisp fever, which is fine. Everyone goes through that.

> But I'd be curious to know what language you think uses nothing but line breaks and indents to describe its AST.

You simply didn't get what I was saying. Even when all the parens were stripped off from a Lisp code, you can easily reinsert parens based on line breaks and indents. So people rely more on indentations for correctly putting parens, rather than being cautions w/ every single editing operation.
I really like this. Thank you for posting it and sharing code. It's in line with my interests and I'm going to use the heck out of it.
The legal right that's been violated is copyright: copies of her work were taken and fed into the ML model...

You've stated this very confidently but I see no legal standing for it. Generally copyright infringement concerns itself with the reproduction aspect. Feeding a bunch of images into a model which generates a set of mathematical weights is at worst transformative in nature.

Now whether or not the images produced by this model constitute copyright infringement is a different matter.
Productivity went up during COVID. It is going down when we're making people return to the office
For work: NextJS, because Remix's future is now a little less clear. Also, there's 10x the help and documentation for NextJS. NextJS is where the mindshare is, for better or worse.

For fun: Whichever appeals to you :)
> Wales hopes to turn WT.Social into a full-fledged social media platform that does away with the algorithm and will "rank based on trust,"

Awesome. A website without "the algorithm". So some human is going to be doing this "ranking based on trust"? For every reply thread?
I love the author's description of piano players never getting to play on their own instruments and having to settle for what is provided to them. How true! I used to play piano/keyboards in an Emerson, Lake, and Palmer cover band, but after so many stuck keys and out-of-tune pianos, I ditched keyboards for a six-string bass and now play in a band that does mostly Rush and Dream Theater covers. I was shocked by how much my band experience improved when playing on my own well-cared-for instrument vs. whatever dusty beast existed in the corner of the venue.
I know how Mastodon works. I've had several accounts over the years, always ended up closing them. Mostly because : silence. I see there's a bump in engagement recently because of we all know what.

I was asking why people use a particular server, and why would they recommend it.

I have issues with two points you mention :

> If you want to discuss a specific topic...

I do not. I have many interests, and do not wish to have multiple separate accounts for each. It does not make sense. I engage with others about many unrelated and completely different topics, putting them in isolated silos is one if not the greatest of Mastodon's main problems, in my view.

> You might also want to sign up on a server that has a community that is in your region or speaks your language.

Again, I do not.

I speak several languages natively, and have roots in different countries, where I am at different times.

This attempt to put the user in a box from the start, a tight box, as defined as possible in all respects, is a real problem. I find it hostile, honestly.

Edit : Should I think of Mastodon as if it was IRC ? I never have, I don't think that's what it's supposed to be.

Edit 2 : Thank you for your answer though. I should have mentioned that I am not trying to figure out how to use Mastodon, but was looking for feedback from people using it.
I'm fine with having a "Contact Is" at the top end of a pricing table. At that point you've probably got some pretty unique requirements and there's likely some level of customisation involved.
I think the only disputable thing is using a person's name in the model name.

If model's name would have been Funny Cartoon Creator instead of X Y, then there wouldn't be any reason for outrage and vitriolic articles.
Does it handle multiple writers on the same machine?
For example two people ssh-ing with the same user to a remote machine with hishtory
I don't know anything about Ruby, but I'm curious, why so?
> Except in order memory access is what modern CPUs aim for
> Strided access has always been slow, on CPUs, on GPUs, on everything

Yes and no. It's not as if hardware engineers completely stuck our heads in the sand and just let the performance be shitty, they've actually developed very sophisticated prefetchers (in this case, literally called a "stride prefetcher"). Many modern stride prefetchers can detect and launch concurrent lines faults at strides of over a megabyte. Here, we're explicitly exploiting that line faults _do not_ need to happen in order thanks to memory ordering rules provided by the ISA.

While you will still get crumby cache utilization due to hammering a single set, if you are legitimately just going once through a loop and operating on single items (i.e. you're streaming and not returning to items once accessed like in the article), the prefetcher will make a huge difference and get you a decent hit rate.
> Once parity is reached, China cuts collaboration agreements and keeps further advancements within China

Any such actual event happening?

I have heard this stated repeatedly, but my Google search reveals no actual reporting, other than the ones where the foreign party voluntarily exited or being forced aware from their own political pressure (that is not from Chinese side).
I nearly missed Elon's follow up tweet on the $8/month:

"This will also give Twitter a revenue stream to reward content creators"

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1587505731611262976

So I guess they are actually planning to pay Stephen King after all, if he stays Twitter Blue. (Presumably his share of the money would be more than $8/month.)

How they distribute the money will be key. Would it be based on generic follower counts & likes & engagement - which will surely drive massive waves of spambot activity - or will each user's $8/month be distributed to the accounts they follow, almost Patreon or Flattr style? That might actually be interesting.
Reddit does response notification, something that HN does not. If someone responds to a comment of yours, you get a site-specific 'orangered' email that has a quick reply box underneath it.
You make it sound like that was a distinct Chinese tactic and not every country on earth, foremost one that abbreviates itself to three letters, is engaged doing industrial espionage.
I don't think there is any work on that yet, but if the model is known it should be possible to derive the probability that a particular image is the output from it.
I'm not confused. Calling them the left and calling them leftist are different. One can be "left" of the GOP, and not be a leftist. Just like one can be "right" of the DSA and not be an arch conservative.

Neither the left nor the right are monocultures, and they do not hold consistent views. The world is more complicated than that. I'm a socialist who hates plenty of leftists and can hang with some right wingers because I don't write off anyone right of me as a "right wing nut job" or whatever.

You also seem really bothered by this. I'm not sure what's got you so upset. I just don't see the world as black and white as you do, we can say "agree to disagree" whenever if this conversation is making you angry.
The journo just can't help itself and leads with hostile language right from the start. Hopefully it will soon be made obsolete.
>NASA finds super-emitters of methane

I hope EU finds a way to regulate that and add more taxes.

After regulating cow farts, this would be an appropriate extension.
It is status symbol, because twitter nurtured it as a status symbol. You could not get it, unless their commission decided you are notable enough. The impossibility to get it and the social approval that comes with it are what made that status symbol.
Think of it from a non-monetary way and ignoring job security for a moment. Why would anyone (artists/programmers) spend their time doing something a machine can do ? It would be a terrible way to spend ones life. Perhaps the datasets can be licensed (if that's the sticky point) and embrace the AI ?
Looks like it outsold the S for a couple of years (2019-2020?)

https://cleantechnica.com/2021/07/03/tesla-model-3-model-y-m...
Why assume that only current checkmark holders would pay? I'm sure there are many more who wish they had a checkmark who would pay. Overall, I have no idea if it's a winning strategy, but I think this analysis undersells the potential.
How we use Dagger to build Dagger, in 30 lines of Go
I love the idea. Now we need to convince lawmakers.
> He then gets criticised for not delivering on the majority of them

He gets criticized for promising them, even selling them like in the case of vehicle autonomy, when there is no realistic timeline for delivery.

I mean, at least when Microsoft pitched vaporware on stage they didn't then take the money in advance.
Anyone/anything solving the issue of bash histories in multiple (intricated) tmux sessions is an INSTANT win !!!!

[Q: can this tool help? As far as in understand, it seems that YEEEES!!!]
Shanghai Disney shuts: Visitors unable to leave without negative Covid test
> Companies that optimized their supply chains to have more margin made more money and won... as long as the supply chains were all running perfectly. But once COVID happened, it became clear that those businesses had no resilience.

Good analogy thank you.
SpaceX has years-long development timelines, huge capital and personnel costs, and huge liabilities/risks. Yet they can give you predictable pricing and understandable margins and cost models. Sure they are rigid in their requirements, but that pales in comparison to / is far from them using it as a pricing factor in comparison with the requirements asked of a sales guy selling a software team's services.

At the heart of it, the ridiculous pricing practices of "contact us" pricing are to test what a customer is willing to pay.

Have a look at this ML-favorite lately. $50/month for a general user turns into something you will not believe for corporate users. Totally testing what they can get away with.
https://wandb.ai/site/pricing
This depends on the fpga's resources: some have barrel shifters as hard IP.
We're a family of 5 living in 104m^2 and it doesn't feel cramped at all. Granted, we don't have a big "master bedroom" and we don't have an office or a laundry room. We also have to keep the place tidy, because it does feel cramped when there's a mess.

But it really depends on expectations. When people who live in the city visit us, they say "woah, that's a big apartment". When people who live on the countryside visit us, they say "how can you live in this tiny space".

My comment really was about how talking about "area per person" is not a good metric, because how spacious an apartment feels does not scale linearly with household size.
How do you know. If I stick up an image on the internet. Its legal if I made it myself in photoshop, but illegal if it was mostly generated? But what if I just say I made it myself?

This is different to most copyright cases where all that matters is the end result, not the process.
It's not a cook shortage, it's an incentive shortage. I'm guessing coast guard cooks have a pretty shitty time. It's better than nothing, but there are just better employment options these days.
If this was to happen, and we created a world where there was no form of copyright: why would somebody spend their life in a creative industry making new things?
Rewriting software is often significantly more expensive (or, not even possible when dealing with third party code!) whereas with hardware you can fix it once for everyone and see a large speed up across the entire system.
When rates fall, prices for assets like homes tend to rise in proportion shortly after, such that the cost to borrowers is approximately constant. The benefit of falling rates goes more to homeowners than new borrowers, even if they don't have mortgages.
Yes, there should be opt outs for ML training. They could take many forms - robots.txt rules, special HTML tags, http headers, plain text tags or a centralised registry. You can take any work out of the training set without diminishing the end result. But doing so would mean being left out of the new art movement. Your name will not be conjured, your style not replicated, your artistic influence thinning out.

If an artist wants her works to have the fate of BBC archives, that removed millions of hours of radio and tv shows from the internet, then go ahead. The historic BBC content was never shared, liked, commented or had any influence since the internet became a thing. A cultural suicide to protect ancient copyrights.
Do it right. Base 60's where it's at.
Lol, no they don't. They are not rich and they live on fixed or unrelated salaries.

Stephen King is not subject matter expert. He is popular writer. He is also quite atypical in that he is so popular, then he really don't end twitter engagement all that much. I don't know whether he will ultimately pay, but he actually don't have to.
I thought only old people still used the phone for making calls.
Last time I had to deal with the contact at x due to something going wrong they were worse than useless. They broke the product with an update and when we asked to roll it back they organised a full sales team which was presented to us as a call with engineering, except they were trying to sell us on another product to solve a different problem and just ignored all questions about the product we had bought.
I visited the USS Midway Aircraft Carrier Museum in San Diego. The officer's mess had pictures on the wall, all with Filipino wait staff.

I didn't understand why that was the case, so asked the (ex-)officer/docent who was nearby. He pointed out the 1947 change, and added that previously black men were the stewards, but since integration in the military opened up other jobs, fewer black men wanted to be a steward.
I disagree! With ubiquitous voicemail voice-to-text functionality, I find it fast and useful, plus it can be sent using a hands-free device in a car.

I would argue that you’re a zoomer curmudgeon rather than an old one. :)
The hood is above head height for many people. How exactly could you justify calling this not very large?
You can just use your favorite SQL database :)

With the Beam and things like Ets you can often avoid reaching for things like Redis though.
The people with these qualities are victims of systemic problems. Underfunded education, poverty, abuse, criminal justice that just throws everyone in jail.

We fix those things, I guarantee the army will have much better recruits.
Indeed, I'm not disputing that.

However, you still need to mind the context.
For instance, there existed computers in 1952.. Saying that "we had computers in 1952" is still right, very few institutions had access to one.
Most people learning to program a computer in 1952 wouldn't actually have regular access to one, they'd do it on paper and SOME of the their programs may actually get shipped off to be actually run. So it'd even be entirely unreasonable to say "We, the people learning to program in 1952, had computers", one may say "We, who were learning to program in 1952 had occational opportunity to have our programs run on a computer"..

Yes, there were lots of nice hardware in the 80s, and LOTS of people working professionally in the field would be using something cheaper and/or older.
In context of my original post, I took issue with op writing that "we had version control", sure, version control exited, but it was not so widely used throughout the industry that it's reasonable to say that we had it, some lucky few did.
Fairly similar, though you look to be closer to the DJ than I was to my subjects in the only concert I've been to with the new iPhone. I think the 14 Pro might edge it out a bit if I was at a similar distance to my subject.
> There's nothing inevitable about it.

Everything you can come up with as a "solution" is really just a stop gap measure. Instead of specifying the style by name, you could specify it by example image. Instead of training the AI on her images directly, you could train a second generation AI on images drawn in that style generated by another AI that was trained on her images. Thus your second generation AI would be free of any copyrighted work. And of course the whole copyright thing only comes into play when people redistribute the AI. If AI is easy to train yourself locally, even that doesn't matter anymore.

If you want to go all Butlerian Jihad on the world, you might be able to stop it. As long as AI is allowed, this ain't going away, it's only getting easier, cheaper and faster.
Building cache friendly virtual and physical memory allocators sounds like an outright nightmare, y'ouch. How did you end up solving this?
> I don't know, I think more and more people are waking up to the fact that if we want to avoid the mess we're in now, we've got to start paying for things.

Maybe in your tech savvy circles.
I'm working on iot cloud to which you can connect millions of devices (to single server) and it's very easily extensible to different device protocols (we make a driver for each device to expose all of them in unified way). Erlang is perfect here, because it can easily support lots of connections with low latency and you don't need to restart anything when you make changes, which makes development much easier.
That's a really good point, these are more valuable advertising targets.
And Musk lied, like he's been lying for decades.
Really depend son product and tour audience. Otherwise, just about any one would do - family, friends, colleagues - during the early days for usability testing.
It feels odd that Github is deciding this policy.

A high-impact package on another forge wouldn't be subject to the same constraint.
Doesn't matter if it's legal or not

See I don't understand this. Training an AI using this content is legal, but how is copying it in the first place to use not illegal? This is what I never understand about these AI cases. If I copy a Youtube video I'm breaking the law, but if I then use my illegal copy to train an AI it retroactively makes my copying legal?
I read this whole interview and dozens of comments here before realizing that the intended reference was most likely Computer-Generated Imagery and not Common Gateway Interface. (I was imagining that the interviewee mentioned the latter as an example of a technology that somewhat unexpectedly ignited a whole industry -- in that case, web development.)
The blue check mark was supposed to be a service for those consuming Twitter, so that they can have a bit more security by knowing that there's a higher chance to be following the person or thing they were intending to follow; it was not a service for those having the blue check mark.

That's why I don't understand why they want to charge for it.

Maybe a better thing would be to charge per-1000-followers (or per-10000 or bigger brackets) starting at a given threshold, as long as the account is used commercially, where being a star or influencer also counts as commercial use. But maybe even this is a bad idea, but in my eyes a bit better than charging for the blue check mark.
Enormous future potential for derivative work gets created. Enormous future potential for original work gets erased.

Why would anyone in their right mind choose to put effort into creating original art if there is "one easy trick" to get around copyright by simply turning their art into a model that can be used to churn out things they could have produced?
Dick's hamburgers in Seattle starts at $20/hour and pays education benefits. And at the end of your shift you can just go home. And if you don't like the vibe, you can quit.

Seems like not a great deal to get yanked around by the coast guard for years for an extra 4 bucks an hour.
Shinzo Abe could have been protected by six Instacams on sticks at the event perimeter fused to supervising A.I. neural processors in a media truck on site with access to instruction streaming to the ear pieces of the sp.
Image Format Test Page
I was out of the country last month.

Absolutely no spam on my "in country" sim there. Just exactly what I asked for, useful calls and texts.

The moment I got back, I was inundated with spam and texts.

I don't understand how we've let it get this bad in the USA.
Whatsapp wasextremely well known and big in 2013.
Maybe Scala : Java :: Elixir : Erlang
Are those seriously my only two choices?