skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
India’s one of the most prestigious publishers THE CEO MAGAZINE, that selects various industry segments for their surveys and publishes periodic reports about the industry vertical. It placed decorMyPlace among the top 25 leading interior firms in India.
Services –
 Turnkey interiors
 Ready Theme pack
 Renovation
 Kitchen
 Wardrobe
 Teakwood Craft
 Learn Designing
 Elite projects
 NRI Zone

AWARDS & RECOGNITION

 GLOBAL EXCELLENCE AWARD 2019
 Winner of the Global Excellence Award 2019, felicitation by Padmashree Madhuri Dixit as the Emerging Interiors Company in India.
 Awarded as the Best Interior Designing company In pune 2021

Pune Office
 Office 1001, D-Wing, Regalia Residency, Crystal Honda Lane, Behind Arihant College, Bavdhan, Pune, Maharashtra, Maharashtra 411021
Mumbai Office
 Royal Palms, Goregaon East, Mumbai
 +91-808 711 2211 (Give only Missed Call)
 +91-7030962933
 sales@decormyplace.in
 www.decormyplace.in
Hyderabad Office
 My Home Krishe Premises, Gachibowli, Hyderabad
Socialist means something. If a group forms today for an Armenian national ethnostate wanting to commit genocide against Serbs, with nothing even vaguely socialist in their actions, and calls themselves the National Armenian Socialist League, are they socialist? Is the Democratic People's Republic of Korea a democratic republic? No, and no.

National Socialism took the "socialism" to attribute themselves popular pro-left sentiments, same as Mussolini who originally started on the left but pivoted hard to the right.

The whole Nazi ideology is based on racial superiority. Their economic policies favoured big business and crushed labour (no unions, limiting employee protections, etc.). There is nothing they did that could be described as socialist, regardless of their name.
since the "fat event" ones are vaguely defined here, they could be arbitrarily close to or far from the "Entire object" cases. How does it differ? Maybe it does not.
>example.com
Is this hosted in Germany?
In science why questions are not answered within the framework that raises them, you need a larger encompassing theory that explains the phenomena within a larger scope to answer them. In this larger encompassing theory you can sometimes answer some previous why questions but possibly new why questions are uncovered.

In classical mechanics there is no explanation for the stationary action principle, it just is the procedure you follow to derive the equations of motion (it answers a how, not a why). You need Quantum Mechanics, in particular the path integral formulation of Quantum Mechanics, to answer why classical solutions correspond with action extrema.

Long-story short, in quantum mechanics all possible paths contribute equally to the probability of a particle going from A to B but they interfere with each other. It can be shown that most paths interfere destructively between themselves except when the action gets to a extreme (minima, maxima or saddle point) where constructive interference occurs.

Further reading:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_integral_formulation#Stat...
So do you argue that memory is different from point of view of resourse allocation/deallocation because it is much harder to exhaust memory than file descriptors, tcp ports and such like?
> This is a recipe for DDoS.

Inside a datacenter?
C'mon, you're just pushing your agenda now. "No fine is cheap" is BS. How about a 2 cent fine? Not cheap? Whatever.
May be referring to this part of the thread[1] linked in the article

> Wikimedia gave $250,000 to Borealis's Racial Equity in Journalism Fund. That money was then cascaded down to a dozens of ideologically aligned news outlets across the US.

> Thus, the money you give to keep Wikipedia online is diverted to bankroll the inescapable American culture war.

[1] https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1579776106034757633.html
The Internet is people.

Those who tread on the values, interests, or safety of enough people will find certain kinds of cooperation are withdrawn. Technical solutions to this problem are difficult if not impossible, and it's quite possible they should be, because they'd likely involve the privilege to tread on the values, interests, or safety of enough people and/or compelling the cooperation of people who don't want to cooperate. And "Free speech" is not the right to compel people to repeat or carry someone else's speech.

I just finished _Kingdom of Nauvoo_, which is about an early Mormon civic experiment in 19th century Illinois. Mormon history in the US is interesting; you can read it as it's regularly presented in the LDS church, a narrative of a persecuted religious minority hounded at every attempt to settle somewhere. Nauvoo was the "well, we'll build our own city, where we'll use municipal law + state politics to make sure we're self-governed and don't have to answer to other people" stage (before moving on to the "well, we'll build our own state far enough away from anybody else we won't have answer to other people" stage and settling the US mountain west).

You can also read in Mormon history a kind of tragic insistence on supremacy of values and interests. You might make your neighbors mildly nervous by saying "the kingdom of God is at hand and our faith will inherit/run everything." You'll make your neighbors more nervous and upset if you do that and vote as a bloc under religious direction, granting the religious leaders enormous political power / influence. You'll make your neighbors very upset indeed if you wield municipal courts you created to rule that no other court proceedings can hold you accountable when you're charged with a crime.

What human being doesn't insist their values (and sometimes even interests) are supreme? Most of us naturally believe our value systems are superior, for Reasons™, some better examined than others, but all founded in the naturally self-confident convictions arising from places difficult to introspect about. But every value system that insists it shouldn't have to deal with the trouble of encountering or accounting for tension with others carries with it inevitable conflict.

The modern period of democratic nation states have afforded an unusual amount of peace and freedom because we've tried to carve out maximal personal autonomy while providing institutions for mediating conflict. In this situation, individual rights and autonomy are maintained in part because no individual rights and autonomy are absolute. It's a balance, not a simple banner.

The Internet is people, and cooperation with people. Certain kinds of non-cooperation -- no matter how burning the conviction behind them, and in fact often magnified by the conviction -- will call forth non-cooperation in response.
If it was the case, it is enough to say that. They didn't.
Is it legal to not keep logs?
Meh. I still remember my ICQ #.
As someone that recently set up a Matrix server, I'm not sure what you're talking about.
In something like Haskell or OCaml, it would be possible to verify the tree/graph at compile the time. That's why functional languages with powerful (or even dependent) type systems are so popular!
> In the spirit of Jean-Luc Picard, while the interlocutor is abhorrent, removing him from the internet, a fundamental service feels just as wrong as doing nothing.

I know that Finland will disagree with me here, but the internet is not a "fundamental service". It is set of insanely complex systems built and maintained at large cost by hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people.

If I own a car dealership, or a bakery, I have the right to refuse service to anyone who walks in and insults me. Similarly, I think ISPs have the right, as businesses, to refuse service to anyone, for any reason.

Now you could argue something like "but it's a public good! The government pays for a part of it!". This is true, but you can say the same thing about the road system - the entity responsible for creating the road system (in this case, the government) has the power to decided under what conditions it can be used. For example, if you drive drunk, you can be excluded from the road system, 'fundamental rights' be damned.

Despite the lofty rhetoric of post-Enlightenment constitutions, it is wise to remember that the so-called 'social-contract' [0] is, like any contract, a two way engagement. You get police protection and education and access to services, ONLY on the condition that you play by the rules.

[0] and that's assuming we avoid the cynical anarchist view that really, a government is just a glorified protection racket imposing its will upon you by coercion.
Why would lowering speed of a communication make interception easier ? I am thinking in terms of Internet standards (TCP/IP, TLS, etc) and know nothing about telephony:

"This ability to downgrade users’ speed and network quality is particularly pernicious because it can not only obstruct one’s ability to use their phone, but also make whatever communication is still possible vulnerable to interception."
It’s not, I followed a prominent Clojure dev on there and it was mostly politics. Politics I mostly agreed with but it was too much to keep following. That’s not the only example, but it’s the one I think of every time I think of going back. I don’t think twitter needs a replacement, just quitting was good enough for me and that was long before mastodon came around.
You can tame it but it takes some effort. I've managed to do so by just blocking any account that shows up in my algo feed with outrage or politics. After a week or two of doing this I broke through to another layer of Twitter that was very wholesome and got a lot out of it.

That said, I'd still rather go in on a protocol like ActivityPub or SSB so I'm now posting to both Twitter and AP and see what comes of it
> We should have a way to forward every single layer of the stack across each hop, and return back each layer of the stack, so that we can programmatically determine the exact causes of network issues

Thats virtual networking. but that introduces latency if its not well configured.

> But right now, you need a human being to jump onto the user's computer and fire up an assortment of random tools in mystical combinations and use human intuition to divine what's going on, like a god damn Networking Gandalf

not really, assuming you have the right fabric, its nowhere near as hard as that. Plus you seem to be forgetting that there is more to the network than TCP. There is a whole physical layer that has lots of semantics that greatly affect how easy it is to debug higher levels.
The gamecube is 20 years old though and ever since then they've had the weakest hardware. I remember buying a Wii the month it released and being pretty disappointed at how bad the graphics looked.
I assume Work-Life-Balance
Very peculiar spam. Does anyone have a theory what the motive is?
No, experience with people on the planet. People care what others things of them and how they consider them, and are, more often than not, insecure about it.
Some people don’t like elevating leaders who openly flout and degrade our culture’s expectations of how leaders behave. Some of those are silly, of course, but some of them are not. For example, a leader should be knocked down a few notches if they’re calling rescue workers pedophiles for no reason. They should be knocked down a few more for impregnating their employees. They should be knocked down for throwing childish insults at their business associates.

Nothing to do with politics and everything to do with not wanting to live in a world where all of these things become the norm.
That's what gave us Theranos.
Fedilab has been pretty nice to use
> AVIF is still a candidate for a universal, good, non-patent-encumbered open image encoding standard.

Yes, which is why it'd be appropriate by others to remove it as a retaliation which would make JPEG continue its defacto status.

And I've repeated it again and again it is an hypothetical scenario and I'm aware we're unfortunately not the reality we're living in, so I'm not sure what you're gaining from still arguing with me. You should've read my first comment as if it's old man yelling at clouds and move on.
Every time something like this makes the hn frontpage, I increase my monthly recurring donation by 1$. Wikipedia is literally the best thing to come from the modern Internet and I'm not willing to let it die, no matter how "problematic" the Wikimedia foundation becomes.
Depends on the details. If this is just about access to tools and parts, good. If it instead dictates that electronics makers are restricted in their choice of technical solutions, bad. Right to Repair applied broadly is dictatorship of minority. As such, care is needed to get the details right. I think it's also important to distinguish between the Right To Repair and Obligation To Make Everything Easily Repairable. Doubt that there is a valid argument agains the first part. Second is a bit more tricky, especially in the consumer electronics industry where ease of repair can be at odds with performance, efficiency and reliability.

P.S. It upsets me how the industry has succeeded in redirecting the Right to Repair activism from domains where it is actually bitterly needed (like specialised equipment, agricultural machinery and home appliances) to consumer electronics.
> I keep thinking that the query portion should be entirely split from the ORM portion

This is how SQLAlchemy does it. Lower level query tier you can use directly, and a higher level ORM tier that uses the query tier.
What happens if/when Mastodon gets mainstream and gets plagued by all the same problems as twitter? It being the distributed platform there's a very little options to fight fake news, hate speech, bots, etc. on Internet-wide level. Is there any option other than users gravitating to servers hosted by like-minded people, creating a clear separation into social bubbles?
Lots of books! We had the internet but it wasn't very useful for looking up information about programming. We had usenet but it would take a while to get an answer, and often the answer was RTFM.

But what we did have were O'Reilly books! You could tell how senior an engineer was by how many O'Reilly books were on their shelf (and every cubicle had a built in bookshelf to keep said books).

I remember once when our company fired one of the senior engineers. The books were the property of the company, so they were left behind. Us junior engineers descended on his cubicle like vultures, divvying up and trading the books to move to our own shelves.

I still have those books somewhere -- when I got laid off they let me keep them as severance!
> it's not up to you to decide they aren't the "real" left

Sorry, but sometimes it is. When Bolsonaro's crowd started caliming that the Nazi Party was a leftist party because it had "Socialit" in its name, I can comfortably decide that no, the National Socialist Party was not socialist. When my friends tell me that they are against socialized medical care and that people should also pay for their children's education, yet he says that he's a "leftist", I can comfortably decide that no, he's not.
TypeScript type checker written in Rust
First up, I actually agree that the specific fund donation here is highly sketchy, especially the way it bypassed the usual processes and in particular the conflict of interest involved with the counsel hopping jobs between the WMF and the recipient. So I'm not even going to try to justify it.

However, the WMF also does have a history of concrete actions to improve access to Wikipedia: it funds chapters around the world, seeds obscure language versions that would otherwise not be sustainable, and does stuff like sponsoring flights for students and Wikimedians living in poor countries to various Wiki conferences. I'm totally on board with this and I think it's a fine use of a reasonable portion of the Foundations' money, as long as it doesn't imperil the main mission, which it clearly doesn't.
I didn't know that until this post lol. And it was released when I was 12 and actually into gaming. Now I find it weird that the "controller" is so weak that it can't do anything but stream from the console, it kind of make the portability useless.
Both of these were before nuclear weapons were a thing, though.
Especially when most car radars are FMCW radars. They not only do know the speed, they also know the distance.

Some of the newest car radars can do some beam formimg, but not all.

Most models have multiple radars pointing in multiple directions as that's cheaper than AESA.

Only just recently have "affordable" beamformer's come to the market. And those target 5G basestations.

So the spec in most K/Ka-band models starts at 24.250GHz, where the 5G band starts.
While the licence free 24GHz band that the radars use is 24.000-24.250GHz.

If this was not bad enough there has been consistent push from regulators to get the car radars on the less congested 77GHz band.
And there's even less afforable beamformers for that band.
> Every single criticism of TCP/IP in this thread sounds like change for the sake of change, and changes that aren't even presented with tangible improvements in mind or a clear performance gain.

It amuses me that many of those saying "we need to change" are the same ones that bemoan it when car manufacturers remove buttons or make glove boxes operational from a touch screen because they can.
So, reading further, it seems to be a downgrade attack where they force the connection to be made over 2G. I wonder if that would then be visible on the victim's phone. I didn't even know 2G existed...
If you want to understand the geometric basis for the square root of –1, start with http://geocalc.clas.asu.edu/pdf/OerstedMedalLecture.pdf

A complex number is most intuitively thought of as a quotient of Euclidean planar vectors, i.e. a quantity z = v / u with which a Euclidean vector can be multiplied to scale and rotate it into another vector: zu = (v / u)u = v(u \ u) = v.

A unit bivector i then represents the quotient of two perpendicular vectors of the same magnitude. It naturally has the orientation of the plane spanned by the two vectors. Multiplying i by any vector in that plane serves to rotate it by a quarter turn. Multiplying a vector in the plane by i twice rotates by a half-turn.
Thanks so much for the kind words.

Join us on our discord server (https://discord.gg/qZmPgTE6RX) to share what you're working on!
You're not the only one. There are dozens of us, probably, who prefer lighter colour schemes. I can't stand dark mode in all but a few cases. A terminal is sort of fine, but an IDE or a content-rich webpage absolute has to be light, otherwise my eyes start to get funky.
Personal information about yourself which you have to include on your website, and how to register it, depends on the laws of the country you reside in (e.g. Germany has strict requirements on this), so I can't say anything about that in general, but I believe most countries have pretty lax rules here, which should make it totally fine to run your a personal website.

I can say something more sensible wrt your GDPR and "cookie" questions:

The GDPR has one overarching principle: "data minimalisation".

There are no requirements to preserve things like access logs, but rather the opposite: you should only retain personal information for as long as you _need_ it - and then once you no longer need it, you should remove it. And while you have the information, you should take meaningful steps to secure it, where the definition of that changes based on best practices over time.

The important thing here is that you think about what information you need, for what purpose (so something specific like "prevent abuse" rather than "it could come in handy at some point"), and then consider the tradeoff between privacy of your users and your own need for the information (and document this thinking in some way, so that you can later prove that you've done so).

So for those access logs, write down that you log e.g. ip address, timestamp, UA string, referer, visited page (possibly including querystring with search terms), that you retain this information for 2 weeks, maybe that you then aggregate it in some ways, and that you'll delete the information after this time. Your purposes for doing this are probably insight into usage patterns and detecting and fighting abuse. You're explicitly not connecting these logs to other data sources to identify specific visitors, nor sharing this information with any third party, so you believe the privacy impact for your visitors is minimal.

On your website, have a page (accessible from anywhere, so e.g. linked in the footer) that says the same. Specific wording effectively doesn't matter, but what does matter is that it's understandable by your average visitor.

As for cookies:
"Functional cookies" (shopping cart, "remember me" function etc) you can set without any permission.
"Tracking cookies" (advertising, analytics, etc), you can only set based on explicit and voluntary permission (visitors need to be able to say "no" as easily as you say "yes", without negative consequences, and if they say give permission, they need to be able to withdraw it just as easily at a later date, so one-click in the footer or somesuch - they also need complete and understandable information what they give permission for, so put that in the question, and link to a similar page as above for the GDPR).
if you seriously ask: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woke#Woke_as_a_pejorative_term

if you were being sarcastic, the answer is: anything vaguely antiracist ist woke
That makes me wonder, without all the unit tests and all the 'necessary' things we do to our codebase, did any of it really help?

Are modern codebases with modern practices less buggy than the ones from 20 years ago?
Let me reframe the answer:

"We removed them because they cost money. And we are trying to make money ... at least right now.

Listen, this pure autonomous self-driving car stuff is never going to work, so who cares if we have these gadgets or not ..."
> You got all that from "If you remove politics, and focus on twitter."? :)

So far you’re the only one bringing up politics in a thread that has next to nothing to do with politics. So yeah, perhaps that’s a fair assumption?
Thanks for the kind words, Ivan! You're awesome
Most if not all ANCIENT assembers did a 1-pass translation of input source and thus would not recognize tokens that was referenced but not yet declared.

Hence you declare your variables at the start of the program and jump past them.
The important context here is that this is a direct reply to a trans person's application to become an admin on Wikipedia. In other words, they're not objecting to trans ideology or something, they're specifically telling a Wikipedian that they can't be an admin because they're trans.