skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Can you be more specific? What specific claims were labeled as disinformation by whom?

This matters because what was covered at the time was that the laptop was known not to have a good chain of custody. At the time, journalists at the NYT, WaPo, and others reported that they were able to verify some of the emails but that large amounts of data were hard to validate and the lack of a clean forensic history made it hard to confirm validity for many of the files because there were clear signs of access and modification after it had left Hunter Biden’s control. Nothing which has come out since then has changed that, and the general consensus outside of movement conservatives seems to be that the main thing politicizing this did is to make it harder for the DOJ and other investigators to prove anything to a legal standard.
He's using the word as a term of art.
According to the FED they are not part of the government: The Federal Reserve Banks are not a part of the federal government.

https://www.stlouisfed.org/in-plain-english/who-owns-the-fed...
I originally found this out from the bibliography of a book I no longer have access to so can't link the specific studies I was thinking of.

But I also googled this for mere seconds and came across just dozens of similar ones so I do kind of question your intent or at least motivation here.

Anyway just for example all off the first page of google results for "pedestrian injuries by income":

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S13619...
https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/blogs/sta...
https://www.cmap.illinois.gov/updates/all/-/asset_publisher/...
https://johnston-lawfirm.com/new-study-shows-lower-income-ne...
https://www.saferoutespartnership.org/resources/research/poo...

Similar results when looking for disability too. Age I'm not following up on right now for time reasons but since the elderly are more likely than average to be either disabled or impoverished it almost doesn't matter.

What's your goal on bringing attention to the BAC of the pedestrians? People are allowed to drink, even be drunk. Is "drinking and walking" to be a crime too? Road safety needs to account for all conditions and decisions likely to be encountered by drivers, including drunk pedestrians just as much as children and wheelchair users.
This is why it's crazy the Fed is trying to tank the economy the same time Congress is trying to do a CHIPS act. Crazy!

If you are trying to do industrial policy you want to run the economy hot, more demand means less need to subsidize, and all the administrative and conflict-of-interest headaches that come with that.
I strongly disagree with non-competes for file and rank employees but a non-compete for someone that was laid off is just ridiculous.
Disclaimer: I'm a former Meta employee and I still hold a bit of love and nostalgia for the company.

The article is right to point out that Meta has by far the largest and most sophisticated ad targeting and tracking system in the market. The problem is that even if you don't count Apple's ATT the window of places where they can use it is getting smaller: Facebook the app is a shell of its former self, WhatsApp is un-monetiseable despite a lot of attempts to get companies to pay directly to talk to other users, and new acquisitions are impossible in this post-Obama era. Instagram is growing, but mostly in countries with relarively low ad spending levels.

And there comes the difference between this drop and the one in 2018: ads work when people want to spend money on products. The pressures of inflation, rising cost of living, and devaluation of almost every currency to the USD is putting a block in the one reliable source of income for the company.

I would bet on Meta's stock price rising if the economic and social crisis in Europe magically improves tomorrow. Otherwise, it's a matter of believing in the Metaverse and hoping the Oculus Pro becomes successful enough to at least provide another large source of revenue for the company.
I think it comes down to the question that everyone working on tools has to answer: is the good that it can bring worth the potential for evil that it can also be used for? TOR says yes, and they develop it even though terrible people can use it to hide their tracks, because it also allows nice people to hide their tracks so terrible people can't see what they're doing.

I do believe that free speech is so incredibly beneficial that it's always worth having, even if that means accepting cults, celebrities, politicians etc preying on the weak.
This is exactly what the "Pixar-style" animation has been about for the past decade: super realistic textures but cartoon-esque proportions.

I wouldn't be surprised if as development progresses more and more assets get their own cartoon-esque remodel, as OP said it is still very early.
* The Web didn't really exist so no phoning a million stackoverflow friends for help and code snippets. So...

* Reference manuals shipped with compiler and good reference books were gold

* You could learn the entire API/SDK/Framework and keep it in your head

* Blocks of assembly were a legit way to improve your code's performance

* OOP was hitting mainstream along with all the new ideas and approaches (and pain) it entailed

* Turbo Pascal rocked for DOS development

* Source control was iffy/non-existent

* I loved it
Just keep the duration low so that you never saturate the sensor even in bright sunlight and let the NN do the summations.

At a fundamental level it is somewhat akin to bracketing except all that HDR processing/frame matching is performed within the NN rather than a traditional image processing stack.

The NN is better at this anyway since it must already be performing camera/pose motion tracking to correlate what it's seeing from frame to frame.
Did you not read that the New York Times changed their mind a year after your story? Go read the article I linked that was published a full year after your article.

Shame on you for spreading misinformation.
I suspect you are confused about what Remix is, unless I vastly misunderstand htmx.

By example, a request comes into my app's web server at `/posts/123`: how would htmx be involved at all in (1) understanding the request, and (2) generating the response? Remix isn't just client-side, it's also a server with routing and SSR.
> On a third hand, the loved one of a politician was severely injured because of someone who believes the incorrect speech of influential figures and I desperately do not want further injury or violence to occur spurned by incorrect speech on the facts of reality.

If the loved one of a politician was severely injured because of a drunk driver should alcohol be banned? What if the person injured isn't related to a politician?
When you become a government actor you swear an oath to uphold and defend the constitution. In your official capacity, it does seem conflicted to then engage in behavior that suggests limitation of the rights granted by the constitution.

As a private citizen, do what you want, but I think this is understood by the context of the OP.
The lack of integrated terminal or method of running a go program makes me question what use this is to someone. Until either of those is implemented, this is a no-go for me. Not even mentioning that it costs money to use without adding any value over free editors.
>> would you rather make your client happy by getting them a bargain

Recruiters are usually paid based on a percentage of the salary. It's actually in the interests of the recruiter that you are paid as much as possible, strictly speaking.

In reality, my goals as recruiter are:

* happy client

* find a new employee who the employer is super happy with six months down the track

* find a new employee who wants and enjoys this job, and will thus stay

* at a salary that the new employee is happy with, that will not have them looking over their shoulder thinking they have udnersold themselves

* at a salary that will ensure we are not beaten to the punch by another higher paying employer

* at a salary that fits the goals of the employer

The idea of "getting an employer a bargain" implies that I don't care about the job seeker. Believe it or not, I do. When someone comes to me who is a great developer, and is asking under market rates, I discuss that will them and let them know where I think market rate is for their skills and experience.

It might sound cliched, but my job is to negotiate a deal that everyone is happy with, and every gets what they want. Anything less will fail because the employee feels they are underpaid, or the employer feels they overpaid.

I believe the above approach to dealing with salary gets everyone what they want. And yes, I the more it is the happier I am, but it would be very much against my interests to manipulate that.
> If it makes you mad that job ads do not list salary, then there are good reasons and you will just have to get over or it not apply for that job.

Or, we could pass laws forcing companies to do this, and companies could get their shit together and figure out how much they're actually willing to pay.

The nice thing about market capitalism is that companies, for the most part, are fairly flexible. They may not be enthused about posting salary ranges, but if the law says they have to, they'll find a way to make it happen.

It's not entirely unlike how so many businesses prophecy doom and gloom when there's a minimum wage increase, or street parking gets replaced by bike lanes, but then the thing happens and it's generally fine.
> No they aren't rebuilding Hydrogen in Remix.

Looks like they are.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33407274
One common method for low-bailing is telling a prospective employee that what he or she asks is way above the rest of the team/peers and it would be "fair" if he or she accepts e.g. 20% less.

I wonder how often do they lie?
It seems it was originally a Go-only editor when it came out five years ago (looking through their blog posts). Ruby was only added earlier this year, and now this supports more languages. So yes, weird to describe it as a Go Editor still, but it would have been accurate before May.
Thanks. That's an interesting (if tragic) clarification.
Employees have exactly this - it's called "Unemployment Insurance". YMMV depends on which state you live in, but many states, mandate employers pay into this so that when an employee is let go, they receive compensation.

You can debate whether it's enough or fair or whatever, but insurance against unemployment does exist for employees.
There was a model before the Wii Mini that also dropped GameCube support. It looks similar to the original model but lacks the GameCube ports and the "Wii" logo is placed for horizontal orientation instead of vertical. It's sometimes called the "family edition".

The Wii Mini originally released in Canada but came to other regions later. Japan never got the GameCube-less models for some reason.
Right, so it seems (if the news are to be believed) that Elon Musk updated his strategy and asked his new underlings to bring their own code for review...

Of course, somehow according to sentiment here this updated process is still considered an insult...
Heavy push to go from WFH to in office in the last six months.

Decrease in productivity in the last six months.

It must be all the remote workers!

Ignore the return to office push, inflation, burnout, and every other possible factor.
I don’t think free speech/ assaults is a relationship in isolation. The US particularly seems to have issues with violence being a preferred method of conflict resolution, all else being equal.
Pardon me, but isn't this the standard operating procedure for leveraged buyouts of "inefficient" businesses?

Cut expenses to the bone, resulting in a higher profit margin on the same revenue, coast on that revenue while dismembering the business for anything valuable, and then load any transferable debt to the carcass and declare bankruptcy?
Prolly not pushed to your local edge location, my version of twitter updated and it no longer shows the pop up screen yet it still shows the blue bar at the bottom of the page (which is fine imo)
Quickly switch between the code editor and the simulator/inspector group
sure, “no closer” is hyperbole and in the most literal sense of the phrase, we are closer because time has passed… but in the practical sense, we are closer today because testing is going well and so permission has been granted to expand testing — the technology is not meaningfully different, what’s happening today could have happened 5 years ago (if safety regulations were more lax and had permitted testing with less data).
> split their postings into 8 different categories or risk excluding complete novices/interns that might join for near free

I've been helping a friend who's just out of school and going through the interview ringer. They've already gone through one round of interviews for a posting like that only to be told after 2 interviews (for an internship) "by all experience levels we actually meant a minimum of 2 years industry experience for the lowest level". So now she completely avoids anything that is phrased this way.
Free speech is the least bad option. All other options result in violence and persecution.

This isn’t even debatable either historically or in the present day.
One big thing I remember is how small the community of tech nerds was back then. I used to get excited when I'd meet some rando SWE or other tech nerd. "OMG! You work on VAX/VMS?! Me too! Let's talk about it for hours!" Now, it seems like everyone works in tech these days; in the Valley it's hard to meet someone that doesn't work in tech.
One pedantipoint for you.
If this is a good faith question, you can answer it by reference to any good economics text; or even, you know, Wikipedia. But it feels like maybe it's not.

Here's another example: you volunteer at a homeless shelter, where you serve food on a soup kitchen line. You have contributed to the GDP of the United States. By all means, feel free to fit this into your preferred framework.
People are using the term “metaframework” these days to describe things like Remix and Next that build on top of React as the view layer and provide many of the other bits you might need to get a fully-fledged web app up and running. Including but not limited to routing, performance optimizations for images and fonts, data fetching, SSR/static generation & regeneration
> I've yet to meet someone who's good at what they do who isn't convinced of themselves, so that's a given.

I don't think so. I know at least a couple of great engineers who were not so sure of themselves. They were just eager to try, over and over again. Both of them developed novel 3D engines. One formed a company over his engine, the other one taken on one of the best liquid simulation teams, head on, and gave them a good run for their money by being equal to the whole team by himself and his wife.

I'm also on the same bandwagon. I'm not sure that I'll come up with a great solution before touching the keyboard. I'll only say it's a good solution after finishing it and comparing it with other available solutions (if there are any) or similar ones.

I did great things, and I failed miserably too. In every case being not sure about myself allowed me to have a level head, and see through my solutions' shortcomings and iterate over them.

The only thing I'm sure about myself is, I can give a shot, and iterate over it as time and my abilities allow. That's all.
Some things are more important than the CHIPS act.
That would mean the start of a NATO-Russia war, that will almost certainly attract responses from China and other nations - the start of World War III. I didn't say that we would immediately nuke Russia, but if you think NATO directly attacking Russian troops would not change your way of life wherever you live in Europe, you're far more optimistic than I am.
I did that recently as a backup measure, 1Password comes with a good "emergency kit" that you can print out and store in a safe place. It has instructions on how to access the vault and the password in plain text.

The big advantage of a password manager that is consumer friendly (Like 1Password) is that you can store everything in there (documents, passport, notes) and it will be accessible to whoever needs access to it. Not some obscure command line knowledge necessary.

It is also a lot easier than having hundreds of papers / letters in your house. Even if it's not about the security aspect, having everything in one place is a big advantage.
‘We are sorry’ – Boomin confirms it is entering liquidation
Reread my previous message, what those people identify as and their actual politics and views on policies are very very different.
Everyone that is willing to pay an initial 2400.- and yearly 1400.- to RIPE.

Yes we may have to constrain this a little more sometimes but we have plenty of IP space and therefore time before we have to consider this.
Agreed. I've noticed instagram and reddit over the last year have really tried to squeeze the last bit of growth it can by blocking non registered visitors from using the site past a couple of clicks. I get that it's their server resources I'm using up but for some reason the way they do it just aggravates me.
yeah, it's a bit weird that Marques Brownlee recently gave a better presentation on Meta/Metaverse than what Zuckerberg cooked up.

But I think that's the intent. Because when you lay out Meta's strategy so naked, like Marques did, then you realize that no one is going to buy into it. You need early adopters and those are the ones that are going to sniff out that you're actually building a dystopian privacy-invading Skinner Box platform controlled 100% by Meta and they will predictably eviscerate you.

Marques brings up the part of what Meta is focusing on now, which is creating replacements for everyday functions with a VR twist. He claims some of them are actually quite good. But I think this is the way Google approached Google+. People don't want something good-as or marginally better. What Meta needs is a killer app. Something that can only be done in the Metaverse and is so compelling that people are willing to give Meta full control over their life and spend the money on the hardware. That's a tall order.
What investors? The company is being delisted in one week.
I didn't flesh this out enough in the original post, but the CEO isn't actually dismissing it casually. He actually said this is really serious and said he thinks we should address transparently sooner than later. It's more that he's leaving it to me to figure out the right way to approach it. On the one hand, I appreciate him giving me some time/space to figure out how I'd like to approach it. On the other hand, I feel he's kind of shirking his responsibility and pitching it of to me.
It's not a good idea to conflate layoffs of the rank-and-file with the 3 execs that were fired "for cause". At the exec level, it's a whole different ballgame. All of these execs are multi, multi millionaires. I'd honestly be pretty shocked if they don't sue, and at least from what I know now I'd be shocked if they don't win. In exec contracts with golden parachutes, "for cause" clauses are almost always very specific and normally entail breaking the law or company policy. That is, unless these execs were sexually harassing people or stealing money, "We think you did a bad job" won't cross the "for cause" threshold.
Now do references ;-)
That does seem sensible yes, I'm also not particularly interested in preventing people from doing stupid things to their cars if they're that insistent on doing them, it just hurts everyone else.

I guess the problem is how to encourage manufacturers to ensure their emissions functions remain high quality. If the _only_ feedback is customers eventually getting failed inspections and thus higher repair bills eventually, which presumably then leads to them complaining about the cost of the cars maintenance, that's a pretty weak feedback loop compared to direct punishment for producing products that fail emissions checks.

The problem is that once you punish manufacturers more directly they start installing these braindead systems in self defense, after all, if nobody can drive their cars when they're broken then they can't be punished for failing emissions checks.

I guess you could just forbid them from blocking customers at the same time as you punish them, but that's a little unsatisfying.

Maybe just require a way to detect modification or emissions override, and anyone who does that pays the fine if they fail inspection, and for anyone else the manufacturer pays. They'd presumably be begging people to install modifications so they can hand off any fines...
Yes. A password manager and a written document in my successors hands with the passphrases for it and the home laptop with crypted disk. Plus Google account handover logic with dead man's switch, and list of domain and virtual host providers.
Positive and Negative rights matter here.

The right to use your own megaphone is different from banning my right to also have a megaphone.
He's always been a little like this. Fits the hot blooded Spaniards steriotype quite well. He'll get pissed off about something, fly off the handle and then calm down eventually. In the meantime he may churn out some very cool stuff because he actually is very technically talented.
I really enjoy this tool making it easier, combined with dnsmasq and nginx, to spin things up in whatever custom local tld I want with a secure and trusted development certificate
I was small kid back then but playing around with QBasic on our Windows 3.11 was great fun back then! Also used it to create music: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5pwxjJAMjo8
I’d like to see some better sourcing for this. The Wikipedia article, bizarrely, claims that shouting ‘fire!’ in a crowded theatre (and thereby causing a stampede or some other awful consequence) is actually protected by the First Amendment in the US. However, the only source it gives for this claim is a Reason article.

Edit: See here for a more nuanced perspective: https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/627134/is-it-illegal-to-...

Shouting “Bomb!” or “Gun!” in public would put you in a similar situation. In May 2018, for example, officials had to evacuate part of Daytona Beach International Airport after a man ran naked through the building screaming about a bomb in the women’s bathroom. There was no bomb, but he was charged with “false report of a bomb,” “criminal mischief,” and “exposure of sexual organs,” among other things. In that case, no self-respecting lawyer would advise him to claim his actions were protected by the First Amendment.
Do you think the same way about health issues, e.g. smoking, obesity etc etc?
Not saying I agree with it either. Just feel like positions should be represented accurately.
Definitions in TFA:

> misinformation (false information spread unintentionally), disinformation (false information spread intentionally), and malinformation (factual information shared, typically out of context, with harmful intent)

Disinformation can, as the others, be used as propaganda.
GDP is denominated in dollars, so this seems to be a somewhat vacuous position - yes, that's how we measure economic activity, but it doesn't have to involve money changing hands.

Productivity is based on the value of the work done, not any profitability assessment. The original post which set off this chain asserted it was about not how much workers get done but how much money is made off of what workers get done ... which is unambiguously wrong.
XFCE has been working well since inception, and Mate was working well during that time too. On windows, when win 8 came out, you either got left in the dust or had to endure it. On linux, when groups fuck up their thing like that you have the liberty to switch at very little cost.
Yeah, it might be slightly more valuable to IBM or FedEx than $20. But for me $20 is just slightly too much, I like twitter as an open first community, despite all its well established faults, I feel it’s less bad than all the others.
Are you telling me there are no housing affordability problems in the US?

Fascinating.