skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Because you can move between different domains without losing your subscriptions and subscribers, there is no real need to use your custom domain. But because it's not possible to move your old content (I assume because moving files is difficult), I still am self-hosting so I can own my own content.

Another way of doing it is if you're already posting your notes, pictures, etc. on your own website, you can make it ActivityPub aware and use your website instead of Mastodon.
Interesting thought on graywater. It really does seem easy enough for shower/washer/non-kitchen sinks to drain to toilets.
God I really hope we get the Good Ending: Musk kills Twitter and loses $44B in the process.
Let me try to be more clear: Which RR technology are you referring to? There are variants.
That's shitty, IIRC at one point they stopped either Wikileaks or Assange or both from trending on Twitter, but Signal is a tool, it's evil to try to stop people from moving from a walled garden to something more free.

Though the phone number thing remains an issue, I keep putting off re-imaging my phone due to the holidays, which sucks since it was originally meant to de-escalate things since I tend to post harder than some folks in civil society -- I'm from Pennsylvania -- I'll go back to literally keeping a fucking copy of PGP with my lock picks if we need to, Gen Z wasn't around for the drumbeat for the Iraq war, and I'm not going to stop showing up in the comments section to be annoyingly persistent that there's a second amendment argument for crypto if folks want to keep pairing rollbacks on the second amendment without disarmament of the police... I can't wait to go back to London.

(Also, try not to drum up business for your friend who's a therapist by being rude on dating applications if you want to complain about toxicity in non romantic contexts, and that's the last I ever want to say on that beyond "enjoy trick or treating, the adults don't deserve a party".)
Web3 and the Future of New Content Models
Producers Guild of America holds a discussion on Web3.
PKD was largely a product of his time in terms of gender roles, but his short story "The Impossible Planet" may be a counterexample.
On your old account you have to start the process.
> Every aspect of TCP’s design is wrong

The driver of most of a global network of computers which has been wildly successful beyond dreams before it was real… probably deserves a better deal than “every aspect is wrong”. It has worked fanatically well and chasing the long tail of performance improvements isn’t equivalent to determining what has gotten us here is wrong.
And if having no plan wasn't damning enough, the compounding crime was not at least being as good storytellers along the way as X Files.

I couldn't stand all the unbelivable behavior. When you don't know anything about someone yet, then you can be forgiven for falling for deception from them. But once you do catch them doing something inexcusable, why the f have you forgotten all about that an episode or two later? And then act all devastated when the already known bad guy is bad again later... Seemed to be happening in all different directions with all different characters at different times. I never watched more than a handful of episodes before I wrote it off as pointless contrived drama resulting mostly from inexplicable behavior from the victim(s)-of-the-day.

Just to be clear, X Files was never my favorite show, just another show that ended up having no plan, but mostly didn't piss you off for being stupid, so much so that it could get away with being aimless for a long time.

Another way to say it, X Files ended up being pointless, but it didn't feel pointless all along the way. Lost felt pointless immediately and never didn't (for the admittedly short time I gave it).
She said he'd just get bad luck
Blown away by this. I copy text from a CNN article and the questions were spot on. So good that it seemed human generated.
related and some of which has been released open source: https://wokwi.com (not affiliated)
>it is likely far simpler to just stick to stereoscopic vision data (the same thing the human genome decided!)

There’s a lot more to perception while driving than just stereoscopic vision.

First, your stereoscopic “cameras” (eyes) are mounted in free-rotating sockets, which are themselves mounted in a rotating and swiveling base (your head/neck). Your eyes can do rapid single-point autofocus better than any existing camera. They also have built in glare mitigations —- squinting, sunglasses, and sun visors. This system is way more advanced than fixed cameras. Yes, even an array of fixed cameras with a 360 degrees field of view.

Then you have your sense of touch, your hearing, and your equilibrio sense. You feel motion in the car. You feel vibrations in the pedals. You hear road noise, other cars, sirens, and the engine (not much in EVs). You smell weird smells and know when you’re driving with your e-brake on or when there’s a skunk nearby. There’s a lot getting fused with the vision to make it all happen, and I think you’d be surprised how “broken” your driving capabilities would be if you took one of these “background” senses out of the equation.

My anecdote: I drive a manual transmission car. A few months back, I woke up with no hearing in my right ear. Spooked, I drove to urgent care. I could not drive well at all —- I was holding low gears for way too long. I learned that I use hearing almost exclusively to know when to shift. If you had asked me beforehand, I probably would have said that I’m visually monitoring the tachometer to know when to shift. Not the case. Also, I had a TERRIBLE sense of my surroundings. As I drive, I’m definitely building a model of the environment around me based on road noise, sound from other cars, sirens, and the like. Without hearing in just one ear, I felt very disconnected and unsafe. Living in California where lanesplitting is legal, I had several motorcycles catch me completely off guard. I had my hearing restored at urgent care and everything went back to normal immediately on the drive home.

I think Andrej and Tesla massively overestimate vision’s sole ability to solve the problem. Humans are fusing lots of sensation to drive well.
Hmm... if "doing things with cell phones" is horrible idea, then what's possibley the good idea?
Access Denied
You don't have permission to access "http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/0001193125165..." on this server.

Reference #18.b9a72917.1667188304.6601cd4
They have people skills; they're good at dealing with people. Can't you understand that? What the hell is wrong with you people?
You don't even need a framework with Crystal. The stdlib gives you all that you need. I personally do not use any frameworks at all.

Coming to your question, Amber is pretty much dead. Lucky or Kemal are the big ones to use. There are also Athena and Azu toolkit.
The Canon EF 40mm f2.8 is fun lens for DSLRs but with adapter to mirrorless bodies, the adapter eats the small size benefit as with the other small SLR-era lenses.

Sony has been keeping the mirrorless full-frame lenses quite small. The old Sony 55mm f1.8 (which I count to be in the class of 50 mms) is still sensibly sized (less than 300 grams) although a bit prone to flares but otherwise quite close to Otus class sharpness.

And then there's the Sony's 50mm F1.2 GM halo product which is still less than 800 grams. It seems that they are pushing down the weight at the same time they are improving the image quality.

Sigma's lenses are a lot of cheaper than Sony's GM lenses but they are bigger and heavier in many cases and in some cases they are still are old designs for DSLRs.
This is a threat to English learning book publishers. It literally generates a reading comprehension test.
Kinda like the novel, tbf.
Its your server in the nl that has questionable peering, or reduced upload speeds; or you didnt run your tests properly.
Of course people use a variety of email providers, what are you talking about?
Appreciate the reference. Tom was an engineering liaison, not manager though
Of course he meant every employee with a "manager" title. And take "seems" to mean "I doubled the real number for effect".

I assume it's a way of saying engineering is a tiny part of the organization.
It’s also pretty easy to have alts. Most good clients can log onto and track several accounts. You can then flip between various communities; post about work stuff on one, alt for your hobbies or shitposting.
Reverse lights are literally mandated by law. Your Tesla has them, and if they're not bright enough that's a fairly cheap and easy problem to fix relative to the alternatives.

Ultrasonics struggle in the rain, btw.
Everything about the protocol being wrong for the specific case of machines directly wired to one another over a high speed reliable network is not an admonishment of the protocol in general. And the protocol, being an abstract concept, doesn’t have feeling to hurt.
Almost 10 years ago I built a music news platform for his son in law that he funded until he got in the news for marrying another cousin and cut out extra expenses. It was an amazingly stupid project but kind of a highlight of my career getting to talk to "The Killer" and do my best to explain the iOS app his son in law wanted. After Jerry pulled his cash they were scrambling to try to find other funding and wanted me to work for free, which I declined but they said if I did I could meet Kid Rock. Lol.
Yes!!! I have been saying for years that lower level protocols are a bad joke at this point, but nobody in the industry wants to invest in making things better. There are so many improvements we could be making, but corporations don't see any "immediate shareholder value", so they sit around happy as pigs in shit with the status quo.

What's kind of hilarious about this paper is, these are just the network-layer problems! It completely ignores that the "port number" abstraction for service identification has completely failed due to the industry glomming onto HTTP as some sort of universal tunnel encapsulation for all application-layer protocols. And then there's all the non-backend problems!

And that's just TCP. We still lack any way to communicate up and down the stack of an entire transaction, for example for debugging purposes. We should have a way to forward every single layer of the stack across each hop, and return back each layer of the stack, so that we can programmatically determine the exact causes of network issues, automatically diagnose them, and inform the user how to solve them. But right now, you need a human being to jump onto the user's computer and fire up an assortment of random tools in mystical combinations and use human intuition to divine what's going on, like a god damn Networking Gandalf. And we've been doing it this way for 40+ years.
I wonder how much of this can be ELI5'ed with diagrams and intuitions instead of algebra.
> told on Sunday that they need to meet a deadline of
> November 7th to launch the feature or they will be fired

Why the heavy-handed cartoon villain boss thing though? Is this effectively another way to cut people?

Changing the subscription price is presumably technically doable on short notice. But merging it with expanded verification for any and all who want it? Is that a one-week sprint to develop, test, and put in production?
> I'm not convinced of SEC's 2-3x estimated increase

It's a simple calculation, but very location specific. In my particular case, if the water heater is set to 50C, and tap water is 22C in Summer, it has to impart a ΔT of 28C. If your tap water is 4C in winter, the ΔT is 46C. Not quite double, but close to it. If your water heater is in a poorly conditioned space, then it would lose considerably more heat to the surrounding space when outside temperatures are -15C than when outside temps are 35C. All told, hot water energy usage for my particular situation is between 2x and 3x. Other situations would vary, but still significant.
I'm afraid you're simply uninformed here. USSR was the leader.
Ok, but which one is hotmail and which one is gmail?
I Played Facebook's VR Metaverse so you never have to
I had never heard of these... Thanks for sharing!
That's actually a part of the EU's planned Digital Markets Act!
Globalization probably can’t ever end at this point now that the cat is so far out of the bag. The factories that used to produce local or regional goods simply no longer exist in many cases.
Given the number of posts we see here on HN from FAANG employees who say they're barely even working and getting away with it is easy, is anyone surprised there is a lot of cruft at Twitter?
> SE Asia where you can drink the tap water

A very verbose way of saying Singapore.
Newer heat pump bath system in Japan supports to reclaim the bath water heat into heat pump bath system's tank. Though it won't reclaim from shower. https://www.mitsubishielectric.co.jp/home/ecocute/function/h... https://kaden.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/news/523254.html
Oligarch might be a good term to describe Musk and his ilk, too
"Don’t do anything for your kids that they can do for themselves."

Nothing new here. Also, what makes someone who raised CEOs and a doctor special? What about the moms who raised Stanislav Petrov[1], Vivian Juanita Malone Jones[2], and James Chaney[3]? I'd much rather hear from them than someone selling her book.

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanislav_Petrov

2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivian_Malone_Jones

3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Chaney
A classic, but it's really far from how TCP actually works.
The handshake sequence is exaggerated. It's just usually 3 messages.

The 3 initial messages establish a connection.

A: I would like to tell you something. (SYN)

B: I acknowledge you want to tell me something. (SYN-ACK)

A: I received your acknowledgement. (ACK)

After the handshake sequence is done, data transfer begins.

Only then, it is possible to know that the "something" was a joke.

If B answers with RST instead of SYN-ACK the connection is refused. If B doesn't answer, A will interpret this as a connection timeout.
First of all, can you or can you not tell me where I can order some iron redox batteries? You write that they exist at the same price point as lithium ion, but I'm not even seeing them for sale at all let alone for the same price.

The manufacturing chain for lithium batteries is indeed designed to fit existing lithium supply chains. Which is why we're only producing 400GWh per year. Because the lithium supply can't accommodate more production.

The alternative is to do what France has already done: serial production of the same designs of nuclear plants. American nuclear construction similarly experienced much lower costs when plants were built at scale [1]. Unlike lithium mining, which as never been done at even 2% the scale required for battery grid storage, countries have indeed succeeded in converting a mostly fossil fuel grid to nuclear power in a short amount of time [2]. Again, it's been done before, with even worse technology than we have now. You're willing to assume that batter production will increase by 50-80x when there is no precedence for that scale. Meanwhile the is precedence for nuclear power being deployed more cheaply when the same designs are built repeatedly. We only need to build 3.5 nuclear plants for each one that exists in the US to get to 100% hydro and nuclear. That's a lot more feasible than increasing battery output by 100x.

1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142151...

2. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_in_France#Mess...
You cannot use vision to see the state of the side of a steak touching the pan, nor the internal temperature.
I feel bad for Twitter employees learning about their future from realtime memes.
You're cherry-picking an interpretation of a single sentence, when it should be read in the context of the preceding one: Ousterhout says every aspect of TCP's design is wrong for (modern) datacenter computing. He's not saying bad decisions were made at the time it was designed, nor even that it's badly designed for other use cases today.

The first few paragraphs of the article give even more context:

> The TCP transport protocol has proven to be phenomenally successful and adaptable. [...] It is an extraordinary engineering achievement to have designed a mechanism that could survive such radical changes in underlying technology.

> However, datacenter computing creates unprecedented challenges for TCP. [...] The datacenter environment, with millions of cores in close proximity and individual applications harnessing thousands of machines that interact on microsecond timescales, could not have been envisioned by the designers of TCP, and TCP does not perform well in this environment
Experience frees you from the burden of being intimidated by something new. It becomes just get the job done and move on to something else. Dealing with new things become routine if that's not a contradiction in words.
> state-of-the-art classification networks have an accuracy in the 90% range.

If you're referring to ImageNet SOTA, is has 20000 different classes, including 120 different dog breeds [1]. This is a vastly different task than reliably detecting pedestrians where Tesla can actively curate a dataset of hard examples (from their fleet), whereas ImageNet is fixed, sometimes with low quality labels and as few as a couple of hundred examples. Tesla can also pick a point on the ROC curve to give higher recall but more false positives (which is important for VRUs specifically). Another big factor is that Tesla is using video, not still images, which makes predictions even more robust.

And that's just for pedestrians, Tesla are also using a general ViDAR (visual LiDAR) which is trained to detect obstacles that do not have a specific class. The ViDAR again operates on image sequences, not a single image, and can thus pick out structure from motion.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ImageNet
Or he makes Twitter better (it sucks so much worse now) and everyone gets to enjoy it for free.
The new digital television broadcasting system in the US (ATSC 3.0) is exactly this. It's all UDP, but wrapped in another layer which allows multiple virtual streams, and that's all encoded in a CDMA wireless protocol. It's bundled up at the broadcast center, sent out via the big towers, and then unwrapped and decoded on the receiver. The end result is that once the receiver chipset has stripped off the wrapper, the OS of whatever client device is consuming the broadcast just gets regular looking UDP packets filled with MPEG-TS or DASH media streams, plus web pages, ads, games, or whatever. A.k.a. blackjack and hookers. Think of it as a giant one-way WiFi network using just UDP for the packets. It's honestly pretty cool.
Aviation is loaded with these acronyms. It's their technical jargon.

Communicating lots of information in minimal time seems to be really important to them for some reason...

Here's some good resources for looking up acronyms:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aviation,_avionics,_ae...

https://nbaa.org/aircraft-operations/airspace/tfm/glossary-o...

https://www.allacronyms.com/aviation/abbreviations

https://www.abbreviationfinder.org/
I dislike most of them.

It's compounded by the fact that I currently use a Unihertz Titan Pocket. Physical keyboard, but only a 3" screen.
An exaggeration but there probably is some truth to this.

Ten or so years ago even my director wrote code (at google). Now it's rare to see a first line manager code something.
I think the linked tweet makes a very good point.
Is that wholesale price for solar panels? I don't know of anywhere I can buy a 100W panel for $36. Cheapest I've seen is just under $100 and they have been in that range for years.
"But you still have to address his system argument"

Do you? It's his argument that he needs to substantiate... it's not my burden to confirm his conjecture. And even looking at it on its face... it's clearly self-serving bs. It doesn't seem to be a problem for any other car company, so I'm a bit confused as to why it's such a problem for Tesla. Of course, the obvious answer is that Tesla is cheap and doesn't want to pay to have a team that would have sufficient bandwidth to do what every other car company and self-driving system is doing...
"Censorship" has always been a dog whistle for "not letting propaganda and incitement run rampant".
Plus, the spin on the story is so good (because Musk's character means they can use political rather than productivity reasons to justify getting laid off) that they'll have no trouble getting solid jobs elsewhere.

I'm sure there's hundreds of smaller companies eagerly awaiting a lay off list so they can start reaching out to ex-twitter engs.
Doing things in person, with offline techniques.

If your location (which implies who you're with) and at least the metadata of your communications (who you communicate with, when, how frequently, how long of messages, etc) are sensitive, I don't believe there's any way to use a cell phone safely for those tasks.

And having grown up before cell phones, I assure you, there are ways to coordinate things offline. We just need to bring them back.
(author) You can get the source/binaries from the gopher server; they're part of the MGR source tree. gopher://gopher.floodgap.com:70/1/archive/sunos-4-solbourne-os-mp
Thanks for your reply， Has your company ever hired Chinese developers? As you said there are some issues between China and other countries, actually the reason I left the US company has something related to it.
My Distributed Computing professor said, “now we are going to discuss why Ethernet is a terrible protocol but we use it anyway.”

Like democracy, everything else we’ve tried is even worse.
Seems like there must be some sort of possibility for someone to create some sort of "lightweight hosting" option here. Where you get your own bespoke "host" where you own all the data and identity, etc. but it is actually physically managed on someone else's infra (something higher level than a vhost). Pay a small fee, get a subdomain, get your own masto node, get your own data, all encrypted, but someone else handles all the legwork of setting it up, federating it, etc.
Sounds like par for the course for big tech companies. Hire a ton of HR people with no real skills beyond "people skills" because you MUST grow at all costs, those people in turn hire more people like themselves with no real skills, next thing you know you have hundreds of people sitting around collecting a paycheck for doing nothing.
my anecdote, i dealt with 2 managers, 2 tech leads, an architect type person that would jump in randomly, the skip level that would jump in, plus if i got embedded on a project, i had more leads, a pm, more managers to deal with. when i first started at twitter i was 3 people removed from jack, when i left, i couldn't even tell you what the chain was anymore.

to the second point, i dont think i had a single good manager the entire time, i had a lot. the only one that wasnt terrible was the one that phoned it in and didn't bother me and just let me work. i never reached out to a manager there for technical advice.
Google isn’t as bad as Microsoft or AT&T in my experience. My personal server now is working fine with those now too.
Not even "after", you'd generally put the message in the same packet as the second ACK.
What is QUIC in your book?

Given, say, $50 million of dev time, what would you go about fixing? And in what way?
> Now, if you want the best EV, it's usually not going to be a Tesla.

Would love to hear what you consider "good" and what specific EV ticks the most good features that a Tesla Model 3 doesn't.
Run a wordpress instead and put the ActivityPub plugin on it. There are many places you can host PHP/MySQL very effectively and it is much lighter in weight than Mastodon's stack.
Here is some shocking news for you. It's not your eyes driving the car... its your brain.
"Klaatu Barada Nikto"