skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Does Amana Appliances Corp. make a microwave with all-wheel drive and independent suspension? Respectfully, you are comparing apples to oranges.
musk makes it clear why he likes twitter - because it lets you talk to the public without any filter at all, easily. Musk himself is whimsical and trollish on twitter but its not clear how much of that is real vs public image
Reading it either with the word death as written or DEF as intended, it's still a threat.
Awesome. I made something similar in https://github.com/mkmik/runck

But I didn't but a fancy domain name :-)
Why? It's just a currency. I'm from the UK, I think I had the same view. But now, having lived in several different countries, it just doesn't matter what currency I use. If I were in the EU then the Euro would be the convenient choice.

And if it's about interest rate setting I think as one of the top economies the UK wouldn't have any issues.

Don't stick with the pound out of sentimentality. It's a liability.
in other news, criminals dont agree they are criminals, and publish a story saying they are not, so that is now fact.
This whole thing is cracking me up. I guess this is why the 600w card didn't show up. Maybe there was something to the pre launch reports about cards melting themselves.

You know what would teach Nvidia? Buying more 4090 cards at crazy prices. Vote with your wallets. Wait on actual lines to give them more money for stupid products. Moar powah, more upscaling crap, more latency. Moar
Also physical assets like a production plant. Which I'm sure would never be threatened with a shut down over miscellaneous health and safety or permit violations.
Were they? I know I can see their pages, but I don't see any new content from them. realdonaldtrump is still suspended, I imagine we'll just have to wait to see what happens.
+1. So much opportunity for battlefield promotions right now.
> In the real world, sure.

Can you point at one? A council with "widely diverse viewpoints" that is actually an effective, tie-braking decision maker?
If we consider the 1st Amendment a Law … everything.
That's fair! Science is never settled, in any field. It might be better to say something like, "the current consensus is tilting towards gender as a social construct, and sex being more complex than 'XX or XY'"?
Germany currently has the highest energy prices in the world.
It seems seriously insane to suggest banning IC cars before you have a concrete plan to have any kind of sufficient energy supply. How do you cope with tens of millions of EVs charging every night?

Also, if there is no enormous breakthrough in the next decade in battery technology, car ownership will become a luxury for the rich.

(I use public transport daily, by the way. And it is absolutely disgusting, overfilled and obnoxious. Absolutely hate it.)
Maybe I'm wrong but I don't think they were banned, they have refused to delete a specific tweet to gain the ability to post again.
I think the real value in owning a social media company or newspaper is in the influence, not advertising revenue. If it turns a profit, then all the better, but I don't think that's what motivates rich people to own media.

In other words, the propaganda and dog whistling is the whole point.
This is not an accurate representation of what LibsofTiktok is and what content they post.

There are specifics about what false claims. All they do is repost TikTok’s insanity.

In some ways, LibsofTiktok has done world a whole lot of good, by exposing and immunizing against extreme left ideologies that even the most devout progressives reject.

We need more of this that exposed extremes of either ideology. Because clearly the media has totally failed to do this.
It will be, if Elon implements effective agent-based clustering, such as with K-Means Clustering.

"Solving" content moderation is a losing battle -- there is no way to humanly moderate anything at the rate it can be produced, and Elon knows this. It's insane, so he probably won't do it.

But, allowing content to be produced, but making sure no real person ever sees it, until the content producer earns their way into "your" group -- now that can be automated. Also, then the police and FBI could use all the evil content to "do their job" (but, I'm not holding my breath).

Elon has access to Exascale hardware, so K-means Clusters with arbitrarily large dimensionality is at his disposal. The algorithms are linear in complexity, so should be parallelizable.

I figure he might have thought this through...
I think we would see more problems then with this connector - while it is new to the consumer space, all of Nvidia's SXM boards use molex micro-fit connectors for power. For example my Dell C4140 has four 10-pin and four 8-pin micro-fit connections to the SXM2 board, and they are bent at 90 degrees in the 1u chassis.
How they do it:

1) They don't actually spend much time on any one thing per week, on average.

2) Many of the things that count as "work" for them, at their level, are more fun—and even recuperatory—than, say, wrangling spreadsheets at your desk and attending dull-ass compulsory meetings for no reason all day. (put another way: when you have enough money, everything you do is kinda an optional hobby and not something you have to do even if you hate it)

3) They can pay to not have to worry about 90+% of the non-work shit the peons have to. Laundry? Making appointments? Arguing with insurance? Making high-quality, tasty meals? Shopping for the ingredients for those meals? Driving yourself and others places? All strictly optional. That's 10-30 hours of soul-draining bullshit per week just gone (and you can keep any of the parts that you don't find soul-draining—cook, but never have to shop for ingredients, for instance)
Actually a pretty good idea.

I think Sheryl Sandberg running Twitter would be a great idea. She definitely has a ton of experience, is used to dealing with complicated founders and executing on their vision, the only place that she could move up in her career is to be the CEO of not just a large corporation but something meaningful.

In a way Twitter and Facebook are no longer as directly competitive as they were in the old days when it was just FB and Twitter.
My family’s liquor shop was forced to close because our accountants could not keep up with the constant GST changes. They quit and we could not find another on short notice. The worst part was that the shop was on the hook for the unpaid taxes of upstream suppliers - money that is yet to be fully refunded after years.

India’s legal systems and the enforcement of laws are one of the biggest drags on a country with immense potential.
Trump says he won't return to Twitter
I think this is the future for Tesla as a business, frankly. They should be a manufacturer of batteries and other EV components.

Tesla is the king of battery manufacturing. Their EV drivetrains are the most efficient on the market today. But their cars kinda suck overall and they are not going to be competitive with the traditional auto makers in the long run. Better to sell batteries & motors to Toyota, and sell power walls & solar to consumers / resellers. That is their core competency.
> Its not a Intel platform (trust issues due to IME)

You're right to be paranoid. If only people fully grasped what the IME actually was.
>maybe eliminate the high profile banning but a person on the ground will have largely the same experience

It's either going to be a double standard or not. I moderated a busy gaming site for years. Users have nothing to do but re-post what got someone else banned and then complain things aren't consistent.

I would find the idea that a politician gets to say things, but I don't completely absurd.
I don't have a diagnosis.. but I have my suspicions.

I work with software development.

I can't concentrate very well around other people and specially open office environments with lots of noise. So I only go to the office for meetings and work from home most days.

My efficiency a lot better when working from home. I call people when I want something or need information. I usually work on problems 3-4 hours at a time only taking short breaks for food or bio functions. If I need to think outside the box I can take a walk or so something unrelated to let my mind work on a solution - I often get good ideas while not concentrating on solving the problem but letting my brain do something in the background.
I think it's going to be more in the other direction.

He really hates the bots, so he'll probably close up the API.

Until bots gets solved, no developer should expect the API to open up.
Will Elon bring Jack back? They seem to be friends.
He was unbanned prior to musk’s arrival, according to musk.
Idealistic?

Elon Musk has been talking about how awesome Gigafactory Shanghai is for the past year, thanks to Chinese workers who don't talk back to their boss and work harder than their American counterparts.

Dude loves his Chinese anti-speech factory. Or at least, he already is pretending to do that so that he gets his Chinese sales numbers up.

Musk makes the public statements he needs to do business. He has no morals outside of money as far as I can tell. Dude is 100% willing to spout off anti-American propaganda / stereotypes to serve his Chinese masters (at least, this year when his Chinese factory is opening up. We will see if he really believes those words or if he's just playing dumb or something...)

EDIT:

> I think there will be some very strong companies coming out of China. There’s just a lot of super talented and hardworking people in China that strongly believe in manufacturing. And they won’t just be burning the midnight oil. They’ll be burning the 3am oil. So they won’t even leave the factory type of thing. Whereas in America, people are trying to avoid going to work at all.
> But at the end of the day it's as simple as not banning elected officials.

Various ISIS leaders were elected officials.
5D is such a classic, I'm jealous because I couldn't afford it the last time I bought a camera. Now with mirrorless it isn't so clear which one to get. Full frame glass is so big and heavy, but anything else feels like a compromise.
> it may hurt more than it helps.

If we use a web browser as an example, what are the odds that a compromised website is going to try to exploit the browser itself vs. exploiting an external sandbox application? Clearly the former. Sandboxing a web browser will prevent many more classes of attack than it exposes you to.

Also worth noting that the suid binary you mention will refuse to run at all if the executing user isn't in its whitelist. It's not like you can pop a shell on some ftp user and run firejail as root.
It's achieved distracting voters and politicians from proven mass transit technologies.
The right to own private property is and has always been a liberal value.

The (absurd, imho) belief that such a right should preclude any sort of government regulation is a libertarian value.
There's quite a difference between Twitter and public street demonstration permits. Allowing Nazis to get the same opportunity to gather on a public street as any other interest group is inherently limited. If they were gathering in front of every house of every Jewish person in the country 24/7/365, that would no longer be protected speech. It would be harassment.

Granting, of course, Twitter goes beyond this. They ban all hate speech at all, no matter how limited it is, but they're a private platform, which gets to the real heart of the issue. Everyone that cares deeply about this who is in agreement with Elon's side and isn't just being petulant about having personally been banned seems to equate Twitter with some kind of true public square or some necessary platform that handicaps a political movement if it can't access it. I just don't see this. The public streets, the government itself, I have no choice but to use and participate in. Everyone has to. But I have never had a Twitter account, never visit the site, and seem to have gotten along fine like that for over 40 years. Trump got banned and is still likely to win his party's presidential nomination in two years. It hasn't materially impacted his ability to get his message out and reach followers at all. Everything Kanye says is still going to be on every headline in every news service in the country the same day, and if he releases an album, his fans will still know. He doesn't need Twitter. I just don't see how that isn't definitive proof that Twitter is not this true common carrier people seem to think it is. You don't need access to one specific private platform to be heard. They're not like an electric utility with a local monopoly that is truly your only option to access a critical service. Trump and Kanye were both well known with hoards of followers before Twitter ever existed, and people would still hang on their words if Twitter completely disappeared tomorrow.
I did. I was coming from a Toyota Corolla and wanted an electric car. Never considered a BMW or Audi, which didn't have electric options available at the time. Tesla won on range and comfort--I'm a big guy and the Leaf and Bolt were both a bit cramped.

Tesla has actually released stats on what cars their buyers trade in [1]. Most of them are not premium brands. Toyota is the largest single brand.

The anecdote about the people you know who are buying Teslas may be more reflective of who you know than who is buying Teslas.

[1] https://insideevs.com/news/504078/what-cars-tesla-buyers-tra...
Trump craves the attention of the crowd: he'll be back on Twitter.
This list makes Twitter look better at content moderation than they actually are.
Yes, according to the newly unbanned accounts that were originally banned for that.
Haha thanks! Honestly when I saw the domain was available it motivated me to finish the project and share it
it stands up to stress/linpack, I've the flirc case & and official adapter. It may be something to do with trying to accelerate video. Otherwise it has never crashed.

I suspect it's a compilation flag that this ubuntu distro has set correctly that RpiOS has not, I also see some about:config messing to try for another time.
Not the person you asked, I wouldn't say I have a visceral hatred for twitter but I do have a strong dislike.

One issue I find just generally with social media is that it incentivizes some inherent qualities in people that are detrimental to a functioning society. The nature of twitter encourages two behaviors that seem antithetical to constructive dialog.

Tweets are short. This makes it extremely difficult to have nuance in any conversation and makes it really easy for people to take a tweet that might be part of a larger thread or a series of replies out of context. There are lots of examples of a tweet blowing up someone's life and then you come to find out that the reality was, unsurprisingly, unable to be captured in 140 (or 280) characters.

Tweets are algorithmically promoted based on engagement. This really isn't just a Twitter thing, most social media works this way. The problem comes when you combine this with the first issue. "Hot takes" and things that outrage are pretty engaging and end up going far on the site.

So you take these two things together and what you end up with is a lot of content that takes complex topics and turns them into snappy hot takes. People then engage with those and our natural tribal tendencies take over and people fall into camps of either agreeing or disagreeing with the tweet. Now their agreement or disagreement might not be total, but in comes the format of twitter, it's hard in so few characters to express a nuanced opinion like "Well I agree with these parts of the tweet because of XYZ but I disagree with ABC and I think it totally misses the complexities of JKL."

In my experience a lot of twitter ends up devolving into a rabid sort of tribalism. But that's not universal, many people carefully curate who they follow and derive a great deal of value from the site. I think though when people have a strong negative reaction to it, they are probably considering what they (and I) perceive to be the majority case of people following popular twitter accounts (by definition they are popular because they have lots of followers) and taking part in the lower quality dialog trap I described above.
libsoftiktok literally just puts an eye on content other people choose to make public to begin with
Haven't you ever worked at a company where the only thing that keeps the product going is ongoing heroic intervention by people with deep subject matter expertise; even in the absence of any actual feature-driven change?
I'm sure that already existed. Unless he intends to expand the diversity into the realm of racism or other types of bigotry or conspiracy beliefs. In my observation, Twitter is extremely permissive in what kind of speech it allows, drawing a line only at abject hate speech, threats or deliberate disinformation. None of that suffers from lack of diversity of viewpoints. Musk is either intending to allow a lot more shit flinging or he's really deluding himself that he can solve this problem. I'd honestly be more optimistic if he was bringing OpenAI in to do moderation.
The article you linked seems to show that it did, in fact, have a moderating effect?

> NORC surveyed the group before the conference, and again on the same questions at the end; the results were compared with a similar panel of voters who did not get an intense dose of deliberative democracy in the interim. Voters at the event on both the left and the right appeared to edge toward the center. Democratic support receded for a $15 federal minimum wage and for “Medicare for all”; Republican support grew for rejoining the Paris climate agreement and for protecting from deportation immigrants brought to the United States as children.
imho these comments demonstrate an insane level of hubris that is difficult to find in any truly talented engineer
> I'm not sure what would mean for revenue though.

I think if you have a place with useful conversation and also the attention of people, you can make money.
So paying membership fees and having to adhere to all EU regulations and ECJ decisions but without the voting rights?

That does not sound like something the UK would accept.
All countries in the eu are obliged to eventually adopt the euro. But there is no set timeframe. Also all eu countries have central banks, euro or not. So the uk can promise it will join and never do and that will be fine. There is no “ordaining” here, its what the club wants. Like it join it no enjoy tue misery.
People really need to understand that small percent times big number is a normal sized number. And you are pointing out one "false positive" that actually wasn't a false positive at all. You're not gonna be able to distinguish pictures of a naked child taken for acceptable reasons and not.

The story is Google not reinstating the account when the police said it was kosher which is a human problem.
By Musk's own admission, it can never be competitive against the cellular providers - they have the advantage in simple radio/physics terms over satellites.

I have some doubts - 4G/5G access is more and more prevalent throughout the US, and it provides better speeds and lower latency for less cost. T-Mobile's latest "home broadband" router that has an integrated 5G modem is surprisingly fast and affordable now, as one example. Starlink simply can't compete there, ever, seemingly. Cellular coverage grows and grows. Maybe there truly are enough customers cellular will never reach to justify low cost satellite internet? I have no doubts a market exists for expensive satellite internet for those that really need it. I pulled 600mbps over the air the other day on a Verizon 5G connection, just sitting in a store in a small town.

There is absolutely a risk Starlink will be an amazing technical invention, but not one enough people actually need to buy to justify continuing an affordable service. I think even owning a 2nd internet connection outside of your devices could become weird in the future - who wants wifi if the device can just have connectivity embedded from the factory, skipping wifi, routers and broadband connections altogether unless you want them? Smartphones and watches have already ditched the physical sim cards...
Clearly they generate revenue, though.

What's your proposal for how Twitter makes money? Just double-down on the harvesting of personal information instead?
Any potential displays of buyer's regret are ultimately framed by the much more weighty evidence that he made an offer in the first place.

Certainly no one forced him to do that.

"He didn't really want it" just doesn't fly given that context. We don't know why he indicated at some points he wanted to back out. Maybe he just thought he could renegotiate a better deal. Maybe he really did have second thoughts about whatever his reasons were for making the offer in the first place.

But he was, at some point, at least $44B or on the order of "one fifth his net worth" interested. Which seems pretty interested to me.
My recommendations have become such an echo chamber that it actively pushes me away from using YT. It's frustrating scrolling through rows and rows of the same rehashed content from mostly the same network of creators. I wish I could turn the dial down on similar content and ratchet up interesting but unrelated content.
>>If there is a major exodus

I think that is the goal of the announcements, it is always better for everyone if there are voluntary separations instead of layoff's and/or terminations.
Yes, this is how social interaction in the real world, or even smaller online communities, has worked for ages.

It's only on pseudonymous mega-sites like Twitter, Reddit and HN where jumping down people's throats for having an opposing viewpoint is even a thing.
Yet the ayatollah still has an account. Strange.
At least in the US, there's a lot of noxious speech that's legal. The US has very permissive free speech laws overall.
You can make your rules in your land and we make ours in our land. Why do you take this as us seeing you as inferior? It seems exactly equal to me.
To the person trolling me adding profane data: I feel we have a weird relationship and you have actually been pretty helpful.

Thank you for your strange ways of bolstering my security.
Borrowing the best failed ideas of Mark Zuckerberg

https://radiolab.org/episodes/facebooks-supreme-court
there's something truly fun about people joking around in society
> - Free speech .. cesspool continues and worse via anonymous/fake Twitter accounts. Slightly less when one uses their verified account

From what I've seen, non-anonymity doesn't do much to reduce the vitriol of online discussion. What it probably has a larger impact on is on potentially persecuted minorities (say, trans people), where non-anonymity makes it easier to threaten them in real life.
Self driving stuff is really hard, IMHO the US should invest in controlled autonomous vehicle infrastructure and reduce the amount of variables necessary for the vast majority of miles driven. Make it so the vehicles can go through cities at 80mph.
The thing is, the 4090 is the pushed-past-the-limit supercar of the generation, these things always have issues. It's just due to market conditions that they didn't release all the somewhat reasonable cards (4070, 4080) yet. They don't want to cannibalize 30xx series sales, they don't want to delay 40xx series, they want the top of the charts. shrug

Just don't buy a 4090. The technology is incredible, the model is stupid. Buy a 3080 Ti, or wait for a 4080. Like, don't buy a $1 million Bugatti, you could get a $250k supercar and it would probably be better for any real-world use. (But do people buying $50k BMWs complain about these things?)
You are correct, I was imprecise. 100g of pasta is close to 100g of glucose, while 100g of table sugar (sucrose) is ~50/50 glucose and fructose, the latter of which has a completely separate metabolism.

But both cause a huge glucose spike (ignoring fructose metabolism for now) and in that respect they are quite similar, and very different from basically any other kind of food in terms of metabolic response.
You're on the right track keep pushing!