skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I see the motivation and skill of your group, and I hope you can retain that and build a useful contribution. I also see the extraordinary effort required to get to this point, and many projects fail to get this far, so congratulations. Something is obviously going well.

However, I am unmoved by your list of key wins (details below). If you indeed built something useful, is there a different way to deliver your message about the functionality that you enable?

Here are my reactions:

1) Shorten data discovery phase. In my experience, analysts and data scientists are always very familiar with what relevant data exists, or else they can find the right people to acquire what data they need. Often, kick-off meetings for new projects cover with stakeholders which data is useful.

2) Have transparency on how and by whom the data is used. For publicly available data, this is not something that a company usually cares about. Internal and proprietary data management is already a very mature space, and every company with such data already has processes in place to manage data access. I grant this is often a mess, but I also don't see any global solution on the horizon.

3) Foster data culture by continuous compliance and data quality monitoring. Data quality monitoring is extremely complex. I have seen many claims over many years of tools that solve this problem broadly, but I have yet to see any solution that matches the claims.

4) Accelerate data insights. This is a very bold claim for a new project, especially given the many (5+) decades of work and experience developing tools and techniques for data insights.

5) Know the sources of your dashboards and ad hoc reports. All dashboards I am aware of surface this sort of information.

6) Deprecate outdated objects responsibly by assessing and mitigating the risks. This is a good idea, but it is challenging in practice, as illustrated by several prominent examples [1,2,3].

Finally, unrelated to the above, your project's name (ODD) is very similar to the name used by the Outlier Detection DataSets (ODDS) project [4]

Good luck.

[1] http://www.lenna.org/editor.html

[2] https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.da...

[3] https://deepai.org/dataset/fb15k and https://paperswithcode.com/dataset/fb15k-237

[4] http://odds.cs.stonybrook.edu
I thought HSCT could halt the disease entirely, but I'm not sure... It's the silent progression of the disease that worries me.
While that can be true, modular has earned a reputation for bad quality. When you buy one with good quality it is only a little cheaper than stick built on site, and stick built gives a lot more options.
I'm angry about the loss of abortion rights federally, the rise of Christian nationalism, politicians lying about election fraud, people calling their enemies pedophiles and communists, politicans not knowing what those words mean, and facism

What is this center you think we are going back to because all I see are far right politicans and the end of American democracy
You can also see how he's really fast. This is a completely different style of archery from Olympic, which has stabilizers and a sight. Olympic style archers "aim a lot".

Lars shoots a different style, which is basically "draw and loose" with very little "aiming". The aiming done in that situation is to basically "look at what you want to hit".

Here's a Smarter Every Day episode that shows some of that. You see Byron Ferguson there already putting the arrow on but there's no aiming. When the mint is thrown in the air, he just looks at the mint and instinctively aims and shoots it in mid air.

https://youtu.be/Q8Yp9SjCU5E?t=225

I recommend the whole episode.

Also Legendary Howard Hill: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36R7cLzPNuw

It's amazing how well this works if you don't need to hit a mint and no worries of shooting a person and even without exactly spined arrows and with just a stick and a string for a bow. Source: I do this for fun (with larger targets).
They mean “shows brain activity that appears to be specifically triggered by the semantic content of outside input”. Not even aware, necessarily - that level of response can be shown while asleep, for example. And it says that patients have never remembered this, to date.
The NZ Human Rights Act provides the same mechanism for people to sue private companies that don't provide accessible services.
In this age of search engines and social media “amplification” a correction wouldn’t even be sufficient. The original story will always be more salacious than the correction, thus more widely shared and more likely to appear in search results (unless Google etc somehow weight the correction higher, I have no idea if they do)
I doubt it takes many people to run Twitter, but I believe it would take several thousand to ban what must be an absolute flood of illegal videos and photos.
Watching him play made me happy. 8 but era gear is just the best for having fun.
During WWII, my grandfather survived a mortar shell fragment through his skull, leaving him completely paralyzed and blind. He recounted being able to clearly hear the conversations of the doctors and nurses caring for him, and credited his desire to prove them wrong about him being comatose for his eventual recovery. After several months, he was able to move, and eventually regained sight, speech, and most of his mobility. (He lived well into his 70s - long outlasting the physician who diagnosed him, as he would mention on the rare occasions when he discussed his injuries.)
> Am I the only person who thinks of IEEE 754 as a completely well-defined data structure

Not at all... but I think there are a large number of people who think they can imagine a better format and yet don't fully understand or appreciate much of the design of IEEE754, and they tend to be quite noisy.

I think the lack of appreciation is ironically due to how damn good a format it is. It manages to hide the myriad deficiencies through such a good balance of compromises that it casts this illusion that perfect fp math is possible in a generalisable enough way. So on the occasions it surfaces the true reality, people assume it must be some kind of defect that is easily addressable with a new format; rather than an intentional decision to maximise correctness and utility by carefully choosing where and how to be incorrect. FP math is the most underestimated areas by programmers IMO, it's just taken for granted so much, which is probably a testament to how well IEEE754 works.
Biggest change you can immediately make that will have a direct, positive impact - clean your apartment.

Doesn't have to be the whole thing. Focus on one manageable area or category, like laundry, bathrooms, vacuum, etc. Knock it out, then choose the next most logical (just swept? now mop).

Hard to get going at first, but once you start, sometimes it's just as hard to stop.
Oh jeez, I forget that the LP 2 was released after 2010.
I do a lot of “high throughput” stuff at work in both Go and Java, and the Go stuff is usually faster by default.

Java tends to win for really naive programs where the author didn’t bother caring about performance or allocations at all, but if any care was put into it at all Go usually wins in my experience.

The trope that Go’s GC is primitive in comparison to Javas is not really accurate. You can’t consider a language’s GC in isolation.

Java’s GC and JIT are extremely complex because the language semantics are terrible for performance by default. The “everything is an object” model made sense when the language was designed and main memory access times were roughly equal to a CPU cycles, but that’s no longer true by a factor 100 to 200 now.

Go’s GC makes different trade offs (low latency, extremely high concurrency, tight integration with the runtime and scheduler) because the language semantics are much more sympathetic to modern hardware (“true” structs, automatic escape analysis, etc), so it can.
I wonder - which Conservative would you look to as a good example to model such behavior and lead the nation?
Wow that is bad. Its like they gave an intern a shoestring budget and told them to make something happen. The voice actors are like they just grabbed the nearest person and told them hey you are gonna voice these characters.
This is more likely some other problem.

I have two working Gmail tabs at the moment (personal and work) on Firefox, with no problem.
I don't know the history, but there is supposedly a fixed set of Porter Duff blend modes, specific algorithms. For example, this C++ library:

> Blend2D supports all Porter & Duff compositing operators

https://blend2d.com/

Also, the link shared by one of the sibling comments can be searched for "Porter" to see how they are referenced:

https://drafts.fxtf.org/compositing/
True.

Whilst I haven't missed it in Go myself, enough other people say they do that its inclusion was inevitable. Which means it probably should have gone in sooner.
I’m extremely skeptical of worldviews that also conveniently allow one to avoid personal sacrifice. It is worth a lot of money to convince oneself that actually being generous with your wealth is bad.
Maybe you should check the crime rate in other cities. Also consider Covid and the economy as a more probable factor in an increase in crime.

Here's just one set of statistics-Most Murders 2022

St. Louis, MO (69.4)

Baltimore, MD (51.1)

New Orleans, LA (40.6)

Detroit, MI (39.7)

Cleveland, OH (33.7)

Las Vegas, NV (31.4)

Kansas City, MO (31.2)

Memphis, TN (27.1)

https://worldpopulationreview.com/us-city-rankings/cities-wi...
I wish they'd allow crowd sourcing of metadata updates, their metadata is really really bad and can't be fixed.
The common folk may be led to think that the only alternative they have to live is war. And they are led to think that by those small overpowered fraction.

It has been the case for a lot of modern wars (even those pushed by us or nato).

It's not a matter of country.
I'm O+ and I never seem to get bit whereas my B- wife does.
You're not saying anything here. What I think has happened in this thread is that at least a couple of people have determined for themselves that CT is something CA's opt into, and that they can just randomly decide to issue certificates that aren't logged. But that's not how CT works: it's a continuous log of everything issued, and you can't skip entries. If you spot a certificate without an SCT tied to the log, you have dispositive evidence of misissuance, and you kill the CA. You need all the pieces of this system for it to work: not just the log, but the SCTs (which don't exist in the DNSSEC protocol, and which browsers can't compel).

All you're saying at this point is that CT doesn't, in your opinion, matter. But now you're contradicting your own argument, which was, previously, that DNSSEC can easily copy CT to do DNS PKI transparency.
I'd also recommend "Miracle Mile". Dunno 'bout the horror scale cos it's not that kind of film. It's about the day of the event. Leaves an impression.
I'm not sure if you mean the book or the game (I've only read the book) but I think it might go back further than that. But maybe I got it from there.
We started to realize we can't build nice things because no one can be trusted to actually use them responsibly, and you can never take it back once it's out there.

One need only look at the U.S. Nat Sec apparutus to quickly reap a plethora of examples of this principle at work.
It's ridiculously easy to influence people through propaganda.

Like you, for example, or majority of "west" for that matter, has completely believed that "70%" number that was released by Russian government.
I think 'easy to write assembly code for them' might be stretching it a little bit. Some instructions were pretty complex and I would expect be quite hard to use in practice.

What is certainly true is that a single instruction could do a lot, making for much more concise code than would be the case for RISC code.

IBM S/360 is probably the most influential CISC architecture. There is lots of S/360 documentation online. If of interest I did a short post on S/360 assembly a little while ago.

https://thechipletter.substack.com/p/writing-ibm-s360-assemb...
The laws on what makes you inadmissible medically have changed fairly recently, specifically the dollar amounts that they consider excessive.
These examples are not applicable and thus straw man arguments, because I limited the scope of my observations to those that are most often and typically critical and unimpressed, and did not include, universally, anyone that happens to not care for something. The symptom is not that they don't like something, rather it's that they don't like anything.

Clearly this new version of CoD is graphically superior to previous versions, yet the criticism is focused on less than perfect minutia that probably also existed in or was inferior in previous versions. The graphic realism is better than any previous version of CoD, yet that still isn't good enough for narcissists. Even if it was absolutely perfect in every way, this still would not satisfy them because they are mentally ill and suffering from specific symptoms that cause them anxiety, to feel like nothing they do is good enough, to feel threatened by others' accomplishments. When they dismiss and denigrate they are really focused on their own fragile ego.
This is an even bigger issue, people feeling like their opinion is so important they HAVE to have one and they HAVE to share it.

If you don't have anything to say beyond "yeah it looks awesome", upvote and move on.
One adage I like: "pessimists sound smart, optimists make money."
> Or the prophecies of remote jobs being outsourced will come true and the onsite folks with their job security will have the last laugh.

Hailing from a country that's a popular outsourcing destination (Poland) I noticed that during the pandemic while the number of remote job listings accepting the likes of me increased, so did the salaries.

All around me people suddenly started having daily rates of €350-600 - the lower end of that range was close to the upper end of local listings.

To an extent it stayed that way. It appears that regardless of how wide a net companies cast, they still need to pay up to attract talent.
There are a couple misconceptions with this. There is no such thing as “inflation”, inflation exists in different categories and inflates differently based on supply or demand for different products. It wouldn’t make any sense for housing to inflate at the rate that consumer electronics inflated, they are totally separate markets.

If you want a real answer, look at the population now vs. the population in 1995, and the number of housing units now vs. 1995, you’ll see that housing has not kept pace. The prices are a form of equilibrium. Because increasing supply in many locations is physically impossible, prices are unlikely to drop much. Another input people don’t want to talk about much is the price of energy, and the cost of skilled labor which has skyrocketed. The cost of building things is simply more expensive.
Java requires a much more advanced GC and JIT because Java programs tend to allocate a lot more and have extremely bad memory layout when you're not restricting yourself to primitives. Project Valhalla's value types will significantly improve the situation. Relying so heavily on the JIT also has other problems especially in programs that have widely varying execution paths.
People have simple problems don't need to visualize the graph, the automatic connections just work. However there are people doing a lot of complex things. When i'm watching YouTube I.don't open the graph, but when i'm recoding audio I do as then I need to control where each connection is going, and the whole setup is very complex
Its also lifestyle when you are young and alone, not when you ie want to start family. For me I preferred (before starting family) to have 3-4 far away backpacking vacations and come back to green mild climate civilized safety and mountains. Now with family, it would be incredibly selfish from me to do this to them (although I know few parents who do it... not much respect there)
Growing up in rural New England, every now and then we'd have some moose wandering through. One jumped over my dads car, leaving a pretty significant dent. Moose walked away unphased.

The thing to know about moose: they don't give a fuck. they're a goddamn moose, and they'll go where they please and be there for as long as they like. The fuck you gonna do about it?

And when you're stopped in the middle of the road waiting for the moose to deign to let you by, you just keep reminding yourself of that little fact, and remember how to be patient.
>A Reuters investigative report in July documented children, including a 12-year-old, working at a Hyundai-controlled metal stamping plant in rural Luverne, Alabama, called SMART Alabama, LLC.

> In a statement on Wednesday, SL Alabama said it had taken "aggressive steps to remedy the situation" as soon it learned a subcontractor had provided underage workers.

It's hard to believe no one noticed 12 year olds working in manufacturing. It would be one thing if they were 17 and this were some legal technicality.

Willful violation of the law and a "oops weird" cover up. The fine will likely be a fraction of the money they saved.
You’re totally right. And now they’re downvoting you for saying even this, which is silly. Well, it seems some people agree with me and are able to go against groupthink, so that’s nice.
DNA, and many other biological polymers are structure as well as storage, some of these regions are about structure and modification of structure, to facilitate modality of function. they act as recognition sites, consensus sequences, torsion limiters, process interference selectors, user defined variables.

picture if you will, a big mass of magtape, no spool just a disaster, and you have to scan accross this mess until you find an accessible loop of it with a particular flag or type readable- likehow magtape works, except you have the mechanical challange of reading the tape in the form of a quivering, dynamic mass of spaggetti being read at mutiple locations and having to remain undamaged.

some of these regions make the biggest contribution by simply allowing mechanical slack and positioning of contact sites.
That's good news!

I'm guessing MS is still going to be inadmissable because our meds cost ~100k/year (or more depending on the med). We're expensive.
Because the rewards for being in government are less than in private sector. So we should identify high performers in government and pay them more.
>Increasing debt is increased money supply in the present, not in the future.

I phrased that poorly. I should have written now and in the future (the future because I am assuming bailouts will happen regularly until a total collapse). When the government enables socialization of losses and privatization of profits, that lets people today realize a lot of the potential gains from the future. For example, land that costs x years of work can now cost 2x or 3x years of work.

>Econ 101 would tell you it means reduced purchasing power but that doesn’t account for how much the US dominates the world. There are several untapped sources of low labor and costs around the planet.

I think there is a lessening of the domination, specifically with competition from China.

>This is currently a non issue unless we suffer a double whammy of continuous high rates and the discarding of the $$$ as the worlds leading exchange currency.

Yes, the US is still in a relatively good position, but what has occurred is a fracturing in the trajectories of the US population itself. If you are top 10%, life is awesome and looks okay going forward. Next 10%, you have a chance of moving into the top. Next 10%, you are treading water and with some luck might move up. Bottom 70% has stagnant futures or looking at declines (relative to their recent past).

>Human ingenuity or labor capital continues to be as high as it ever was in the highest echelons of research, finance, industry etc (compared to the revenue being produced).

Yes, but the distribution of gains from the ingenuity will be less equal.
This article exists because Hyundai noticed, no?
I used to like 20 seconds from this exact spot, even though I believe it. I'm in some disbelief that this is real, it's just so accurate.
Thanks for the reminder that there is no non-blocking i/o for files residing on block devices.
Just reading the Wikipedia synopsis of this films plot I already feel like it’s nightmare material.

How on earth we as in humanity want to keep weapons around that would render us this way is still beyond my comprehension.

I also don’t know that I want to be a survivor of a nuclear war. I will be honest, don’t think I could handle it. I have dogs and a wife that needs specialized care. Just thinking about the terrible things that could happen to them alone and not even getting into the rest of the people I care about has already managed to depress me now.

I’d rather avert circumstances than even risk exchanging nukes
> Logically it can't be the whole story or nearly everyone would have MS.

Sure, but I think some people are just more susceptible to certain things. I think it would more likely that everyone with <insert right genetic lottery> who gets EB will more than likely develop MS.

A majority of people that smoke tobacco will not develop lung cancer, but a majority of people that have lung cancer smoked tobacco.
Sounds like you already know!
If you want a hard/interesting parsing challenge, try Clojure’s #_ reader macro. It’s a powerful construct that allows you to comment the next form. If you’re not used to Clojure, it’s like writing #_ in front of anything --a function, an array, a keyword, etc-- to comment it, even if it’s on multiple lines.

For example:

#_ (defn foo
[x y]
(println x y))

This is equivalent to commenting the three lines. Things become even harder when you learn that these thing "swallow" the next form and can be used anywhere:

(let [a #_ b 43] #_ #_ hello (H N) (print a))

The code above is equivalent to the following:

(let [a 43] (print a))

All the rest is comments.

The hard/interesting bit is that to tokenize you must construct a syntax tree in order to correctly parse the next form, but in order to construct a syntax tree you first need to tokenize the code.
the world is a rough place

there's all kinds of abuse going on, even without the child labour, in labour intensive jobs.

man this sucked to read