skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The problem I would say here is you're thinking in binary, but real life doesn't operate this way.

Lets take a current potential problem. That is a low powered application capable of facial recognition. You can now strap that on to any number of dumb weapons and you've created a smart weapon.

In itself it's not a problem, until it starts happening a lot. If you think like a house cat, you tend to think that society owes you its existence and you're the king of the hill. But say weapons proliferation occurs all those ideas of "I have rights" go right out the window, and this loss of rights will be supported by the masses that don't want to get droned in the head out on a date. The tyranny you want to avoid will be caused by the pursuit of absolute freedom.

As technology becomes more complex the line will blur even further. AI as a build your own 'terrible thing' will happen. Physics demands it, everything is just information at the end of the day.

Now it's up to you to avoid the worst possible outcomes between now and then.
>...example of free speech

Well, you have a point there.

But if any of the screenshots of the 'catboy'(?) discord are real... I think there's probably a line being crossed.
v2 doesn't have native Apple Silicon compatibility yet. Rumors are we will need to wait for the v3 release.

In terms of the dev resources:

1. Here is a basic official tutorial: https://vcvrack.com/manual/PluginDevelopmentTutorial

2. A pretty good video tutorial: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d670AFZKGnw
They spent so many times and money and you want them to release it for free? Do yourself work for free, you get a salary for your work right?
Does this mean that writers use a branch and merge based workflow?

That would be amazing and it is the one major thing missing from other options like Statamic.

Nobody understood my needs around this when I was looking for solutions.
I've been so excited about this since I tried an early version last year!

I've been playing with the beta and I can't wait to build more things with it.

Thanks for all the hard work folks!
>I have seen it. SD is capable of generating CP that is indistinguishable from a real photograph with correct anatom

You mean a child with no clothes? is that CP? there are painting and art of children with no clothers, or you mean you seen sexual acts too? Since I never seen it with adults , AFAIK SD was not trained with porn scenes , at best you might get realistic breasts but not get realistic sexual organs and add on top the low resolution.

>There are user made SD models trained on porn available for months now.

So you would also have an issue even if SD was 100% SFW because some dude in his basement would train it to generate breasts and dicks and then combine it with SD that can generate faces, so SD should not exist ?

People were drawing porn stuff digitally for decades, now an AI will do the same, maybe you need a better case , CP is still illegal, Google and Apple will snitch on you also so WTF is this hysteria ?

In fact tbe cause of this CP and Google stuff I avoided experimenting with Google colab SD, the AI might paint a monstrosity but Google AI might think is CP and close my accounts.

Also you feailled to respond to my accusation of missing evidence, missing evidence that drawing porn or CP ever caused victims, or more victims then say sending you kid to church.
No, but he happened to be wrong for it.

The NSPA's goal was never to actually hold a march. They never did hold a march in Skokie, after that defense. Their goal was to harass Jewish communities through the process of applying for the march, which Goldberger, for all his good intention, assisted them with.

As the article notes, they sent letters to a whole bunch of suburbs asking for a permit to hold a march. They never followed up with the suburbs that ignored them, nor did they march in those suburbs either.

The whole thing was a bad-faith tactic which today we'd call trolling. They weren't fighting for their right to speak freely in Skokie, they were fighting for their right to use the legal process to harass the city of Skokie.
In the reference documentation

:h index

https://vimhelp.org/index.txt.html#index.txt
There is also a performance question:

https://youtu.be/kbn9UCRK2Qg?t=1228

Judging by the image of generated assembly code in movfuscator repo, I don't think the mov-only solution would be efficient.
Frankenstein?

We're living in a vast open-ended experiment. No one has any real idea about the eventual effects of our new technology. (I see it as almost a matter of taste where the line should be drawn. Stone tools? Fire? Should we just never have come down from the trees in the first place?) The ultimate ramifications of the invention of the transistor are unknowable.

I kinda thought I knew what was going on a little bit, and then Twitter became a thing. AFAIK no one predicted Twitter, and no one can predict the effects of Twitter, TikTok, et. al. We create these intricate feedback systems, essentially general AIs with whole humans as the neural nodes, and we only have the crudest of conscious deliberate control mechanisms in place.

People have debated for centuries now how much responsibility the discoverer or inventor has for the effects of their creations. Dr. Frankenstein, eh?

There is, in practice, an ongoing dynamic balance between the raw creative/destructive chaos (highly dynamic and intricate order) and the stable, safe, "boring" drive of humanity.
You can see this in Cellular Automata: they fall into four sorts: static, simple oscillators, chaotic, and "Life". "Living" CAs all have a balance between static and dynamic patterns.

On the one hand these companies have the right and responsibility to be as cautious as they believe prudent. On the other hand, who ultimately is fit to decide for the other person what they can or cannot see or say or even think? On the gripping hand, we've had moderation of content ever since mass media has been a thing. Try showing a boob or a penis on prime time. Janet Jackson did it once and people lost their minds, 'member that?
I am interested, but I don't want to give you my email to "get started" because I do not understand what it does, how it works, etc.
There's the bencher crate as well, which provides a similar API to nightly through macros that work on stable. On one of the projects I maintain we reverted from criterion to bencher because the criterion results sometimes made no sense.
Information webpage movement
An early internet promotion that would have probably been more costly if they had the same advertising reach was online casino deposit bonuses. In the early 2000s it was popular for online casinos to offer bonuses on deposits used to play. Say 50% or 100% bonus up to $2000. The only catches were one bonus per household and you had to bet at least the full amount of the deposit and bonus before cashing out. There was no limit on the game to use it with or other hoops to jump through. So it was pretty easy nearly break even in black-jack for 30 minutes, cash out, and move onto the next.
This doesn't quite answer the question, because you could say the same thing about UI code:

If you have your state distributed in an OOP-style GUI, the "am I checked" state of the checkbox should always correspond to the boolean value in the model, if it doesn't then something went wrong.

The point of SSOT is that you don't want to architect code such that there has to be more code designed to keep things in sync, because there's the possibility that that syncing code goes wrong. Distributed databases aren't exempt from that, we just have a high level of trust that the people who wrote the syncing code know what they're doing.
All serious guides consist of ordering from foreign pharmacies and then knowing what the things you ordered do.

If you have any information to the contrary I'd love to see it.
Using your analogy with malware and spam, the users that do not want to read kiwifarms can choose not to by.. just not reading it. Or blocking it in their firewall or browser. Seems like it's a bad analogy.
Come on now. This is common knowledge and you can easily research it yourself. What you're doing right now is the moral equivalent of saying "nobody has shown me evidence that germs exist" on a COVID-19 thread.
You need to count on the absence of accidents also. This was disclosed when the 2011 tsunami hit, cutting the electricity in several coastal cities, and a part of the tuna stored by Mitsubishi was spoiled

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/japan-bluefin-tuna_b_2504942
Cool concept.

Does anyone know of something like Datomic but that runs on top of Postgres? ie. Postgres + change history/management.
s/handable/handleable/ ... note to self: write out the words in your head correctly :-/
> You're somehow conflating not actively supporting a cause with censoring someone.

No, I'm merely making the argument that spam control tools are not censorship because the user decides. I'm not sure how the paper supplier fits in to this argument. Perhaps it is a good analogy for the original topic.
> but the discrepancies in traffic were impossible to ignore

Why? I have no doubt it was more profitable to cover that one candidate, but the point of a non-profit news org is that you shouldn't have to follow mass market dictates like that.

> when news organizations do choose to leave the money on the table, they are never recognized for it because nobody will come out and say "we really wanted to run another story about X, but we chose not to because we didn't feel it was right to keep doing that"

I feel like that's your own fault. You're a news organization, you could have gotten the word out. IIRC in 2016 there were lots of articles about the meta of covering X, and by 2020 X explicitly not being covered the same way was an official stance of news organizations.
Absolutely, the performance would be terrible, but under circumstances where you need to be sure there's no side channels (like in a secure element kind of chip) maybe that's acceptable.
> moving an icon a few pixels is also a purely aesthetic choice

It's not. Aesthetics are actually a design principle: "Beautiful products/objects are perceived as easier to use and more valuable than ugly ones. Even if it is not true!" Since no one is actively looking at server racks there is no opportunity for the color to even play a factor.

> And yes, many detail oriented bosses are not successful, but Jobs actually did create a trillion dollar entity so I think this is more than just a survivorship bias.

Huh? You literally just defined survivorship bias. If only one party (Jobs) survives a large party ("many detailed oriented bosses"), then that's a survivor, and you're bias to thinking that would led that party to success is because of the same characteristics as the others that didn't.

[0] - https://uxdesign.cc/design-principle-aesthetics-af926f8f86fe
As much as I agree with the free-market/private company angle. I also have to say that we are all in a "culture" war, or a war for mindshare in the general public. You have to understand that the right is losing. Sanity and nuance and reasonable thought are losing too, let's be frank about that. Just look at the crazy discussions about any heated topic like race, gender, and now the war in Ukraine to see that.

That is why they hold these two seemingly-opposing viewpoints.
And I’d argue the reason these crappy software products often succeed is because they’re made by people who have direct knowledge of the problem.

I know a guy who works in the food industry. Not a CS nerd by any stretch, but he started dabbling in Python, and then got a huge raise because he could use Python to autogenerate PowerPoint decks that present a bunch of otherwise tedious-to-assemble information in a fraction of the time.

Could a professional developer do a better job? Almost certainly.

Did the company need to go find/hire one to achieve a huge efficiency gain? Nope.

Will the same guy be able to spearhead some massive greenfield app dev project? Not anytime soon.

The same thing is happening across industries. People with iPhones and Davinci Resolve are churning out social media content that previously would have required $100Ks of equipment and specialized training.

Will these same people direct the next Oscar winner? Probably not. But that’s beside the point.
It is amazing how fast net neutrality people disappeared when this was the topic
> but nothing about algorithms, data structures, architecture, patterns, how to properly structure your code.

To be fair, that is the fault of most programming textbooks and courses.

Maybe ONE programming course (Learn Go With Test) I’ve seen has focused on this.
Personally, I know very few people who don't have a digit at the end of their email address.
Southern California’s Notorious Container Ship Backup Ends
> Two wrongs don't make a right. If Kiwifarms is acting illegally, sue them in court. If there are no laws, lobby to make them.

No ISP is compelled to provide services to the likes of kiwi farms. If there are no laws, lobby to make them.

You have no right to force others to cater to your personal whims, specially if they are objectionable.
So what pretext do you purport about Gamer Gate?

Your post does not include any clear opinions, just negations of who-knows-what
True, but they have enough trouble on their hands.

His greatest asset is being ignorable by the state. If finding him was important enough for the state, he would have been found, even if he was abroad.
Yeah, totally are though. For real.

See you next thread!
...cryptographic programming language...
It’s not incorrect. Inaccurate maybe, but not incorrect.

You know why all internet traffic goes over port 80 and port 443? Entire generations of admins who learned that their job was to say “no” instead of “how”. By the time the fingers got peeled away from that issue the damage had already cemented. Similarly ORMs also got a healthy nudge from DBAs who decided it was their job to protect the business from ever doing anything new. Today the priesthood of the DB is all but gone. Devs are expected to do those roles because otherwise nothing gets done.

And similarly, the Cloud doesn’t say “no”, it says “how much”.

Are bad things happening now? Bad things always happen. I read Applied Cryptography while I was still in college, and have worked at a lot of startups and in other small projects, so I am biased toward thinking devs should not be making other teams babysit them. Advice and control are very different things.

Edit: I’ll note this isn’t my opinion, but my opinion plus decades of listening to devs vent about people out of earshot. Sometimes to the point of sedition. There are some big frustrations out there and creative people steer solutions away from frustrations. It’s not an accident we are where we are. People voted with their feet.
i'm European, but i am familiar with the work of the ACLU at Skokie, including that detail

keywords: i'm European

meaning your appeal to an absolute right to freely speech washes right off

it's on you to defend the harassment incited and guided by KF

that includes, i'll remind you, a juvenile attempt at calling in a threat in Belfast; didn't work, they didn't know the old code-words

one example of what you'll need to defend; or you can stop digging
SponsorBlock maybe

https://github.com/Automattic/pocket-casts-android/issues/46...
Lsp mode depends on neither helm, nor hydra. I think there are some utility things that can use helm, but as far as I remember it that didn’t require that helm was set up for anything else and it has never conflicted with anything else I use.
The Christchurch massacre wasn't initiated by a KF user or initially streamed there. That happened on Facebook.

KF "only" archived and reposted the video and manifesto by the Christchurch terrorist. This is illegal in New Zealand and the police asked KF to release the data of all NZ users commenting on the video, which JM refused to do since it's an overreach and they legally run under an US entity thus don't have to comply. That didn't go well with the NZ law enforcement and got them delisted from there.

This is why people associate KF with Christchurch, however the terrorism act itself was not initiated by a KF user and anyone saying so is spreading fake news.
Then why are they still hosting several sites that people complain about it all the time too. Cloudflare loves providing services to Nazis as long as they don't get themselves associated with mass shootings too often in the same small time window (8chan) or your Infosec hire turns out to be associated with some of the Nazis who claim they have inside help to stay on Cloudflare. (Daily Stormer)

Infowars is literally on Cloudflare right now.
An oil worker sources and find the oil necessary to create plastics.

A nuclear sub designer puts together a tool to ensure peace. If you want to see a world where big sticks are not around, look at any non polite society.

Tobacco is on par with weed For effects. It provides an effect. There is a reason salespeople smoke, because it calms the nerves.

Journalist of old was valuable, journalist of today is from a school of training that you need to be an activist to force change, which means they are no longer providing a good, but an active manipulation toward a belief that the journalist believes in. If you think a journalist has an iq above 80, take a look at an article in your field, then realize they are mentally deficient and are trying to promote a message. Then look at other articles and realize this same person is doing it.
I hear you.

There's a page on the FSF site[0] where they give some pointers on the kind of support the various SoCs have, but it's very terse.

For the records, I have an Odroid C1 that's collecting dust on a drawer...

[0] https://www.fsf.org/resources/hw/single-board-computers
Polaroid was started in, and grew around Cambridge MA. It was kept alive on life support by a $1B settlement paid by Kodak for infringing their instant photo patents
Show HN: Codeduel.org
The problem is you have people who have anecdotal experience that says whites don’t act in racist ways. I have a bunch of data that I could drop here (100s of sources that say otherwise). I’ve seen these debates online before and I’ve never seen a single opinion changed.

The problem is the things being challenged for many (of not most or virtually all) people is their identity and morality. Not simply an experiment about if blueberries have more antioxidants than blackberries. Data and evidence simply don’t matter in these sorts of discussions. And that’s why they tend to devolve quickly.
Kudos to the developer! I'm a huge fan of open world driving sims (Forza Horizon series) and find the endless roads (and the long races) a great way to unwind. Knowing the roads is one thing, but add in changing weather conditions and general road traffic, each corner can be different each time you go round. Certainly keeps me on my toes!
That's so interesting, I never considered it but think I understand how you feel.

I've always wanted more stats like this. I expected/hoped Google Play Music (and now the inferior YouTube Music) would provide amazing overviews of what you listen to. I wish I had stats on the music I listened to in WinAmp in the 90s and a way to see the change in my musical tastes (and the consistent threads through the years). I bet I could track relationships very easily by the playlists I listened to.
Open source in cybersecurity: a deep dive
Analyzing select aspects of the nuanced world of open source in cybersecurity
The new tutorial is fantastic: https://textual.textualize.io/tutorial/

It's worth working through it even if you're not planning to build a TUI app, just to appreciate how well designed the tutorial itself is.
Not really. Those who host malware and spam domains have them taken down. It's not just about a user receiving a spam email, it's also the fact that when a domain is being used to distribute malware the hosting provider will remove them.
There are some interesting and relevant responses here, yet none of them clearly address the specific question you’ve raised.

How are single point designs more advantageous in some contexts, and redundancies more advantageous in others.

The most meaningful difference in these circumstance are regarding coherent design and delegation.

By coherent design redux is where you store your information to be most immediately avail for use. Consider having paperwork for your busy business. You have one place where that paperwork goes so it stays with other like things and you can easily find it when you need it.

Delegation however is dependent upon factors outside of your immediate environment. You may want to delegate a redundant backup of your paperwork offsite, yet you would still only have one place to look for it in your office (lest you accidentally maintain multiple divergent copies of the same files.)

When delegating, you may well have a primary, yet there is a risk/overhead completely consideration regarding how many redundant delegates one may rely upon (as many as you can afford/keep consistent.)

Notice, even when delegating, you will still want one coherent WAY you delegate. Having each piece of business logic decide how to fetch data remotely vs using one library (redux) to organize these requests.

Ask yourself, what does this simplify? Am I delegating control of a valuable asset? What happens when that part cannot be relied upon?

In this circumstance, you are considering in-app business logic organization vs network topology.
Hmmm, if that's the case, then except for those who don't mind being locked in, its not clear what the motivation is to contribute.

Though I suppose if there is enough benefit to the free product (I'm not that familiar with it) - and confidence it will remain free - that might be a draw.

Perhaps there is also potential for it to be forked for a genuinely open service - I'm just a bit sceptical about "open source" that doesn't keep the implied convention to be fully independent, but perhaps that's unfair or unrealistic here.
A few questions, if I may:

Is the intent that this continues to evolve by newer libyaml code getting transpiled, or that it's effectively a fork and might gradually become more idiomatic Rust which does the same job as the C but won't track any changes? Or is this basically "done" and only small changes (to both this code and the C libyaml) are anticipated anyway?

The c2rust documentation cautions that any platform independence isn't preserved, so if libyaml has types which are different on platform A versus platform B, the c2rust transpilation on platform A just gives you Rust types for platform A, losing that independence, was this an issue for libyaml ?
Was your experience the same thing as the linked article? I mean, reading this as someone who knows epoll and not kqueues quite as much, it sounds very much like "I tried to use this API like something I already know and it didn't work, so I hate it and it's broken".

The linked article basically goes through a bunch of scenarios examining clumsy ways to chase a slightly-obscure requirement ("wake up exactly one thread per event using a single descriptor") just to land in the very last paragraph on the clearly correct solution ("just use ONESHOT, that's what it's for!").

I mean, there's literally a feature right there in the man page[1] that does exactly what the author wants. They just didn't want to learn about it and view their ignorance as a bug in the software.

Meh. This gets tiresome. As the article linked yesterday points out, epoll() is the "API that powers the internet", and has effectively solved the C10k problem for everyone that has it.

But yeah, you need to read the man page.

[1] No, seriously, it's right there in the man page, discussing exactly this scenario and how to avoid it.
Presumably eglot was picked because it's by far the more emacsy LSP client. It does most of its user-visible job by integrating with other built-in packages, like Flymake, ElDoc, project.el, and most importantly xref. Integrating lsp-mode would make much less sense, since you'd be integrating an alternative universe of packages that already have built-in analogs.