skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Search for business display [0] and expect to pay an unsubsidized amount for it.

[0] https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=pastYear&page=0&prefix=tru...
I didn't say ALL uses. Just the ones where Excel is being used as a crappy combination of programming language and database.
So make that kind of residential space... different.
> Curiously, they never use the same logic when referring to positive effects of capitalism like a boom in life expectancy and reduction in poverty.

Bullshit. I am perfectly happy to give capitalism credit where it works well, and so do most people other than extreme leftists.

Meanwhile, people defending capitalism seem to do this much more often: Capitalism does something good -> all hail capitalism, for it can do no wrong; something bad happens under capitalism? Literally anything else is to blame, specially communists.
https://devblogs.microsoft.com/windows-music-dev/load-x64-pl...
You can do equivalent configuration with the extension settings but I can see how not having imap/nmap could be annoying. However, macros work just fine. I use them all the time. Press q and then another letter to start recording a macro for that register. Press q again to stop recording. Then you can type @<letter> to replay the macro
Hmm, I recently switched from TJ Greek Kalamata to a super-market brand because the former didn't taste good to me anymore. Now I learn that that particular TJ stuff is "authentic" (or "orthentic" as Paulie Senior liked to say) so YMMV.
Which one? passmark or plus one?
By far the most valuable substance in the world is oxygen, without which everyone here would be dead within moments, and yet (nearly) nobody here has ever paid a single cent for it (apologies to scuba divers).
Telling your legislator what you want while being a billionaire is one of the main reasons why we can’t have an actual democracy
> To me, Stage Manager is as useful and practical an addition to Mac OS as putting a USB numeric keypad inside the packaging of a new MacBook Pro.

Not trying to be silly here. Probably need my brain calibrated here,

I would love the inclusion of a keypad and would find it incredibly useful, especially for accessibility reasons. So I find the idea delightful, which I suspect is not the way it supposed to strike me. I am assuming one is supposed to find that idea exotically stupid and niche?
> Adding more warheads, especially ground-launched ones, is cheaper than adding more interceptors to the ABM shield

Assumes facts not in evidence. An accidental ICBM launch is catastrophic. An accidental ABM launch is merely expensive. This drives anything associated with ICBMs to a much higher cost, just to assure that it will launch when commanded, and won't launch when not commanded. Interceptors are generally smaller (due to the smaller kill vehicle), which also helps with the cost. GBI, last I looked, was about $90M per missile. GBSD is currently looking at about $660M per missile ($264B for 400 missiles). This doesn't actually compare how much a Russian ICBM would cost, but that's irrelevant, in a sense, since they wouldn't be paying the same for an ABM interceptor either.

> hypersonic glide vehicles and fractional orbital bombardment

These both have severe penalties to the actual number of warheads launched on a given missile. Now instead of having 6 missiles, for example, to hit a given set of targets, you might need 18 missiles. Which drives up the cost of ICBM system. Both of them can also be defended against (GBI can't manage against FOB with the current single defense site, but a potential expansion could bring the radars and launchers required to be able to defend against a southern approach). Hypersonics are very fast in the atmosphere, which helps limit their radar visibility, but the same thing makes it impossible to deploy effective decoys, and makes them extremely bright in IR, which is something we already look at from space. I don't think we have anything that can currently do it, but it's definitely on the list of things we're looking at.
+1 for Alfred. Amazing software.
Just moved my Gatsby blog to Astro and couldn’t be happier. Astros built in apis for interacting with Markdown files are a treat.
Sounds like dual booting Linux and Windows is a good solution if you want to develop and play games.

Desktop Linux is pretty serviceable for any tasks that aren't gaming. It may require learning different tools if you are used to Microsoft/adobe products, but the alternatives do exist. If you're doing command line work, it's better on Linux than osx anyway.
I couldn't even suggest a good alternative:

Windows: Windows 11 is a mixed bag with some better design and some worse. Currently, it's a bit of a step backwards. Windows 10 is pretty ok though.

Ubuntu: I wouldn't say Ubuntu is in a better place now with Gnome than it was 5 years ago. It works well, but it doesn't have the cool factor that Unity did and is missing a lot of its features. Ubuntu Unity exists, but it's a little buggy and not as polished as back in the 16.04 days. You could always go KDE Plasma (or MATE if you're old school).

There's the rabbit hole of other Linux distributions, my favorite alternative being Arch. But depends on your tolerance for tweaking.
Eating bananas may not be ethical. That is very subjective.
What I meant was, the definition of value is different for different people, as well as yourself in different situations. The magnitude of that value will also differ, of course.

You're free to define value to always be price, it's a matter of opinion and by my own logic it's a valid thing to do, but separating the two concepts makes things much clearer when market effects distort the price of something who's value doesn't seem to have changed.
Managing complexity is important even if it results in suboptimal solutions.

Imagine if when building a house you needed to shape every single brick for it’s actual load. Sure you end up using less materials, but you lost economies of scale and suddenly need vast quantities of computing power for minimal gain.

Using uniform bricks and banning stuff may seem wasteful, but it enables efficiency elsewhere.
There are plenty of great third party tools that do power user features (including window snapping/tiling). Apple is better at defining a workflow and toolset for casual users and forcing them to adapt to the Apple way. Power users would naturally push back if Apple did a similar thing for them. So I think it's better that they leave any advanced features to outside developers.
I totally agree with the author’s summary:

> That trepidation and sinking feeling of “What are they going to break this time?” every time the WWDC’s date approaches, has been wearing me down in the past few years. What one should feel, instead, is: “Apple got this. I’m in good hands. I see no reason not to upgrade straight away.” And I haven’t felt this in a long time.

I haven’t looked forward to a release since Snow Leopard, and High Sierra was the only usable version after that. Mojave and onward have been just dreadful. Mac software hasn’t been fun, exciting, or good in a long time, sadly.
Needs a little "Zeiss Ikon" logo around the pupil.
Maybe it's not a bad idea to remove all the foods that need unhealthy vegetable oils.
In the US, yes. And if it's a mixture of olive and something else they also just can't call it "olive oil" on the front label either.

On the other hand that's just what's required. If nobody's looking closely, who's to say what you're actually doing, or what has happened from your upstream suppliers with or without your knowledge?
> I get California Olive Branch “100% California” EVOO because I heard it was genuine. Do you know if this is true, and if not, which brands are?

Broadly speaking, get what you know and what's close.

Have a friend in Italy, Greece or Spain? Get it from them. Live in California? Get it from there. The longer the supply and trust chains for something like olive oil, the higher the chances of funny business.
It’d be cool if they used the iPhone built in magnets, and then display your phone stuff in the OS
This thing looks like a very genetic cache. You can of course use /dev/null as a degenerate cache, without any performance benefit though.
As people's lives become increasingly lived through their smartphones, it's getting harder to draw the line between a 'digital good' and a 'real life good/service'.

It seems obvious that Apple shouldn't get 30% of what Amazon charges for a physical book.

It seems obvious that an in-game power-up only exists because Apple created the tools, devices and ecosystem for developers to reach (and monetize) so many users.

But amplifying a social media post isn't so clear (to me at least). It's sort of like an in-game power up, in the sense that there's no marginal cost to the seller. On the other hand, it's also sort of like advertising, which seems to me like a 'real life' thing that has marginal costs (because you need properties on which to post ads).

I don't have a conclusion here. But, if you accept that Apple is entitled to a 30% revenue cut of some category of services purchased and/or consumed within iOS apps, then it's not easy to say exactly what that covers.
Theoretical or practical?

Perfect offense is never going to be fundamentally different than what we have today - any countries involved will be irreconcilably reduced to ash. Perfect defense? The reason the world has not had major open war between developed powers since 1945 is not because we've somehow grown enlightened or moved beyond war, it's because of the above. It's the same reason the Cold War isn't called World War 3. Nukes removed any sort of win condition in war. Perfect defense enables the return of win conditions, and the end of peace.

That's the theory. But in practice one could reasonably claim that ever more irrational and unwise individuals seem to be making their way into positions of power. And in this scenario, nuclear war will happen. The only question is one of when. And so here obsession on defense, regardless of its cost, would probably be the optimal route.

Both views seem quite reasonable to me.
LOL no. Humanity’s heat sources (burning fossil fuels, fission, geothermal) are a drop in the bucket compared to solar irradiation and the resulting heat.
From what's already been posted on HN about Kiwifarms, I do think they proved their point that Cloudflare did lie and defame them. It'd be nice if we could get an official statement to post here, but their site is obviously offline.

Poast is an ActivityPub instance; specifically a Pleroma server. This particular post is mirrored on all the other Mastodon, Pleroma and Misskey servers that federate with it. I used this post because there are literally no other news sites covering this. I tried using an archived version, but that post appeared to have been shadowbanned. It shows up for me, but not when looking at my profile in a private browser.

This is a dangerous escalation when it comes to Internet censorship. Just today, we're learning that Google Drive is deleting copies of Kanye West's recent interview (https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTRHTPD5p/) from peoples' personal storage.

> a Twitter "free speech" alternative.

Why is free speech in quotes? Why is everyone in the tech community suddenly opposed to freedom of speech? When I was younger, at least the Americans would say, "I don't agree with you at all, but I do believe in your right to say it." There is literally no such thing as "hate speech" if you believe in "free speech." The two are mutually exclusive. You cannot support one while supporting censorship of the other.

We're not on a slippery slope. We're in a free fall.
Yes, maybe it is too much to ask.

Windows is a general purpose OS, which is why it dominates two enormous markets: business software and games software. Microsoft will usually err on the side of developers because of this. The two companies' philosophies will of course be different.

If MacOS had similar mindshare in those markets, Mac developers would probably ask Apple to avoid overnight changes like the discontinuation of x86 Macs.

MS still provides security updates for Windows 7 despite its EOL occurring nearly 3 years ago. This is because many organizations still run critical software that they cannot shift away from, for whatever reason. Apple doesn't have to do that because no hospital or airport is running their logistics on MacOS.

Even with all this baggage, Windows on ARM has been available in some form since 2012's Surface RT.
> how is this not the default?

This is just speculation, but based on a conversation with my partner, there are two types of computer users. The first group makes use of hierarchical storage, consistent naming conventions, and other organizational tricks to give them a rough idea of where any file might be. The second group has never heard the term "file systems" and just stores everything with an arbitrary name in whatever location the originating application uses by default.

The first group would prefer to search the given directory, because the supplied context (of which folder to start the search in) drastically improves/speeds search results. The second group prefers to search the entire disk, because supplying that additional context is impossible - any file might appear anywhere.

The set intersection between the first group and "people who change their default settings" is much higher than it is with the second group. Consequently, the whole disk search is enabled by default.

Additionally, given the addition of an "All My Files" view in Finder (a feature which the first group would probably find baffling), Apple may also believe that the latter group outnumbers the former.
I care, very much. I will no longer host any new personal projects on Github, and I will not use Github at companies I lead. I'm looking for alternatives, major one at the moment being Gitlab.
Do you text with friends, family, or colleagues, and if so, is it from the laptop? I find my communication hampered without the phone, but like the idea of leaving it away from me more often.
true words, but mentioning the move from a tropical island to SV is its own kind of virtue signaling
They stopped being thorough after John Siracusa stopped writing them.

Seriously, back in the days John Siracusa would dive into internal details. For example in 10.7 Lion (in 2011) Apple introduced full disk encryption. John didn't just stop at the usual description of the functionality, screenshots and performance metrics. He described Apple's then-new logical volume manager implementation to get this feature to work. He then speculated on Apple's future plans for the technology (pooled storage aka a single logical volume group spanning multiple physical drives) which became the reality in 2012 with Fusion Drive. This is the kind of review I wanted to read.
I’m new to MacOS but there’s a $4 app that enables window snapping. I know it’s annoying to pay for that but it’s still worth it in the big picture
MVNOs are the way to go here. US Mobile[0] gives you access to the Verizon 5G network for a lot less.

0 - https://usmobile.com
Psgan Pose and Expression Robust Spatial-Aware GAN for Customizable Makeup
Homer Simpson's adage that "you're both right" might really apply in this case.

Outsourcing to a content farm might very well result in lots of the text being rendered by GPT-3 and similar generative AIs. The two are certainly not mutually exclusive.
Regarding the venerable Tomcat, they [somewhat] recently added support for Unix domain sockets.

* https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/402

* https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/532

We fronted the server with haproxy LTS. Our initial testing showed roughly and order of magnitude [10x] increase in the number of requests the server could handle.

It's not completely plug-and-play; we still had a write a custom valve to set the request remote ip address and some other TCPish stuff, but nevertheless the capacity far outstripped our need for the technology.
A UNIX OS that lets me begrudgingly run certain Adobe products from time to time.
Great. He has a president title (presumably with a salary) on the backs of thousands of people who actually write hundreds of thousands of lines of open source for free.

I don't care at all about his view on ethics, in this case I'd prefer a Disney lawyer.
What response am I baiting, exactly? I am challenging the contents of the post. If I misunderstood the author's intentions when they said

> That is why you see the feminizing of men. Talking about your feelings, etc. This doesn't work for men. Action works for men. They have eliminated most sources of action

then the author has failed to communicate effectively. Because on face value, this claim is unfounded, uncited and frankly sexist.

> The bottomline is

No, let's not shift discussion away from that which I objected. I objected to OP's sexist rhetoric. I don't care about the bottom line, if everything above it is invalid.

> The only implication "feminizing" has here, is that women are not nearly as punished for prioritizing talking as a strategy as men are.

Source?

Anyway, I asked OP to clarify their comment and I will wait for OP to do that instead of letting someone else re-interpret their words.
The dietary preferences of the owner of the site does not alter the validity of the information. The image is just a reference.

Here's the source of that table https://media.johnwiley.com.au/product_data/excerpt/06/04713...
Yep. The RISC-V cores themselves will run the same instructions, but there will almost certainly be a lot of proprietary devices on the SoC they reside on. Chip vendors save money by not paying ARM for a license. Maybe that savings will be passed on to customers. Probably not.
Somehow windows devices are ok at installing security updates and most apple phones are on the latest os version.

I’d be interested to know what the actual story at MS was for this. I think the executives there in the past demonstrated pretty good decision making. Here’s[1] someone claiming something about PM’s thinking they knew better than users and maybe there is some hidden OKR incentive driving that reasoning, but my weak understanding is that that person wasn’t really involved in what happened so I don’t know how true it is.

[1] https://twitter.com/danluu/status/1504567911565824000 nitter: https://nitter.fly.dev/danluu/status/1504567911565824000
> And I don’t understand why. What did she hear that I didn’t?

Easy answer: Her personal zeitgeist. The author seems to focus on the lyrical meaning of the song being the root cause for her emotion. But her reaction is likely far more complex than "satire of communism" but a time capsule or snap shot of memories and emotions of her world when she heard this song. It not only recalls memories of a painful part of her life but also the pleasant parts: friends, relations, family, things and places which are long gone; A temporal marker to a place which she cannot travel to.

Of course the author kind of explains this in the next paragraph, but then seemingly backtracks to her interpretation of the lyrics: "We will never be able to truly understand or feel how the satire hit under the weight of an oppressive communist regime." I highly doubt it was only about the weight of an oppressive communist regime.

When I hear "eye of the tiger" I can get a bit emotional. It has nothing to do with "Rising up to the challenge" or the band Survivor but the whole of the period in which I heard the song. It brings back a simpler time: childhood bedroom, my father was still alive, the joy of being a kid and discovering rock music. It's so much more than the subject of the song and lyrics...
Risk of mortality? I thought mortality was a fact. :)
I absolutely detest using Windows, I refuse to work for a company that would have me use Windows, but even a rabid Linux fanboy like myself knows that Windows is suited perfectly fine for a lot of development work, like all that enterprise crap I try to stay away from, but Windows still has a valid use for developing some things.
Except for the fact ARM is suing them to prevent using any of the Nuvia tech in their chips, since the license terms with ARM didn't convey with the purchase.

There is a good chance they get on the verge of shipping and find they can't actually sell any of their new chips...

https://www.axios.com/2022/09/06/arm-qualcomm-nuvia-chip-gia...
That assumes that submarines are not detectable. This is a big if with all improvements in in sensors.
Release notes: https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-3110/
I live in WSL for all my Dev work outside of Mac based apps. WSL allows me not to dual boot, still use "work" required applications w/out having a lot of issues and completing everything I need in one ecosystem.
I think KDE Plasma is great, highly recommend it.
> Bullies, thugs, prison gangs, etc. will almost always leave you alone if they think you’re going to retaliate.

You're putting people in actual danger with this advice. There's any number of things people can do in response to your threat display. You're telling people the aggressor will always fold. They might call your bluff instead.

Can you actually retaliate? Because eventually someone is gonna wonder if you're for real and you're gonna need to make good on that threat. If there's even the slightest doubt in your mind about it, you can't.
They are validated though. Not as much as they should be, but it happens. IMO the real blocker is hospitals don't want to/cant spend resources on these trials.
Well it only works with Apple phones so
I took a quick look and it reminds me Observable.
The media absolutely loves to celebrate men who take risks and succeed. The reason why self-identifying incels don’t appear in those reports probably isn’t a vast conspiracy to hammer them down.
Humans will never make it off earth. Perhaps we'll make extremely brief flights, like the flying fish.
Lockdown mode looks very usable despite the messaging that it is "designed for the very few individuals.”

Apple said at the rollout that relatively few people should need this, which is likely correct. The vast majority of people don’t have a state-level attacker going after them.

Also it makes sense that the UI/UX is accessible; many of the people who need this aren’t necessarily tech experts. And even if you are a tech expert, you don’t want a complex UI when you’re under attack.
I've been feeling this creeping since roughly the PPC->Intel transition. There was a point where I was turning off more new OS X features than using them. The inescapable fact is that if you do not want to fully jump into the Apple ecosystem, macOS treats you like a second class citizen. I sync my iPhone via lightning cable, use Retroactive to install iTunes (it's better than Apple's "Music" app if you're managing your own library), get my apps via homebrew casks, store my documents locally, and every new release of macOS makes these sort of things a little bit harder.

As far as security posture goes, I'm not too concerned. Little Snitch + Pihole are pretty amazing and I have the skills to stay secure. But it is depressing watching from the Catalina shore as each year another macOS release takes more autonomy from the user.
At this price, with that HW, they are either delusional, or they have to pay insane fees to Qualcomm, they should have built their own silicon

That's what decades are poor management gets you, you late to the party with expired food

Apple was smarter when they came up with their M1; with an aggressive pricing and excellent performance/watt
If Netty get you that number you should spend the time understanding why because your benchmark is 100% wrong.

It's a bit hard to beleive that one of the most used and fastest Java framework is chocking with a trivial test.
My problem is the that copilot (actually codex) training data and model isn't available. If it was derived from open source code, that work must be released.

I'm bewildered why nobody else has brought this up.