skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is pretty easy to clean from biogas.
Data extraction from vector graphics in scientific publications
Corresponding arXiv article (https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.10766) describes analysis of data extracted from a recently retracted paper on room temperature superconductivity.
Can someone change the URL to https? https://www.ivarch.com/programs/pv.shtml
I found it easier to learn and practice interrupt culture with close friends first, one on one. And then practice it with good friends, and then acquaintances, and then in groups. It takes time, confidence, and trust.
Did you even read my comment? Why does discussing intelligence drop reading comprehension on HN by 50%?

>Note that none of the studies I am referring to include inquiries into race or sex differences. Apparently, NIH is clamping down on a broad range of attempts to explore the relationship between genetics and intelligence.
Great Britain: Money (2008)
Particular stocks and options. Either long or short, depending on which.
> Python is slow for ML

The python runtime is slow in general. But anyone using it for ML is not actually using the python runtime to do any of the heavy lifting. All of the popular ML/Ai libraries for python like tensorflow, pytorch, numpy, etc. are just thin python wrappers on top of tens of thousands of lines of C/C++ code. People just use python because it's easy and there's a really good ecosystem of tools and libraries.
Is it time to start using the scary “d word” yet? … depression

It’s been half a year of ostrich like behaviour and borderline paradoxical (but understandable though certain lenses) stock market responses while economies around the world are sliding downhill like they are all practicing for the Winter Olympics.

It’s sort of hard to look at the situation and think “this won’t end up with economic depression” … it’s looming up on the horizon as we get deeper into the reality of a global recession (can we call it a global one yet?) maybe not in the USA, but perhaps the UK, or somewhere else that feeling the current situation more acutely.
> It boils down to this: if you tell people you're collecting data to help them, then you can't allow that data to harm them.

Scientists collect data to discover the truth, not to "do good", whatever that may be.
Then why are you on HN? HN is a great example of where people can speak honestly and respectfully without worry of recrimination from companies or governments.
> I'm pretty sure I'd prefer that photographing, filming, or audio recording me in an identifiable way was illegal without my explicit consent.

You’re talking about banning street photography, a rich art form with a long history that is presently regarded as protected artistic expression.

Additionally, you can’t really reasonably hold any expectation of privacy when you are in a public place where anyone can see you.

If I can legally see you with my eyes, I should be able to legally photograph you. That’s my right.
Fully agreed – it at least seems like you could tune for this in your less deterministic algorithmic sorting, too. There's no Reddit Constitution that says an upvote is an upvote is an upvote – so you could weight upvotes issued from people viewing the subreddits' pages more strongly than those from people viewing their home feeds, upvotes from subscribers' home feeds more strongly than nonsubscribers' /all feeds, etc. etc., downvotes mutatis mutandis
Seriously though... docket.care is doing base level online immunization records. Just a simple Vax record with decent data security. As I get older simplicity and competence are more and more exciting.
Leeches actually work though and we still use them today.
The greatest damage ever done by speech (i.e. motivation to start wars, genocides) has been done by fully identifiable people. Anonymous online speech is a total red herring. All current major threats are due to fully non-anonymous people doing bad things (e.g. Putin, heads of cartels, the current head of $terrorist_group), not anonymous online commenters.

Conversely, one of the greatest threat to authoritarians is speech that cannot be easily traced. Hard to put you in prison (or cross international borders to kill or capture or threaten you) if you're anonymous.

What if your online comment is discussing the latest example of police corruption you've seen in your local PD? That would be a very local example of where not being anonymous may easily threaten you, but being anonymous can still let others start investigating.
Except the evidence of dark matter isn't just about the orbit of a single planet. It goes all the way to predicting the spectrum of the CMB.
Have you tried Arc? (https://arc.net) because I'm with you, re: browser interfaces. Couldn't really get Brave to pull me enough since it was pretty much the same. But with Arc, I'm 1 month in and uninstalled Chrome entirely now. Would be so upset if I could no longer use it anymore.
Very cool video, but mislabeled. It shows stars approaching and passing their perihelion to SagA* 27Kya, not complete orbits.
Opponents of anonymous speech are aware of this. That’s why they’re opposed to it.
Knowledge like “the sun rises in the East and sets in the West” goes out the window when you live at Around 60 degrees or further North.

I highly recommend spending 12 months way up north to have your mind constantly blown by the path of the sun. Every year it’s still a shock to watch.
I doubt they’ve even made conclusions, they don’t want people to p hack their way to nefarious conclusions.
You'd be less likely to be downvoted if you talked a bit more about why you find that startup exciting or at least what about it you get excited about. I'm genuinely curious to hear from someone what they think is neat about it.
How about robots.txt, since security.txt is looked at by humans, but robots.txt is almost exclusively looked at by non web browser clients.
This is a great point because it presents the question of the relationship between one's perspective/emotional approach to a task and whether or not an act is intrinsically "playful", or "fun", and I'd have to think about that more.

The virtue ethicist would say that one should inculcate the virtue of caritas (love) which will enable them to approach any task with a positive attitude, such that something that would otherwise be annoying to do becomes meaningful or at least tolerable with a long-term goal of increasing the love of the other for whom you do the task for.

Catholic virtue ethicists (I can't speak for the others) do see one aspect of life as a combination of work and play: religious service. For example, the Sunday mass is both a liturgy (lit: "a work of the people") but also play: it is something to be done precisely because it need not be done. An omnipotent God doesn't need anything, including worship. It has no other outside purpose in theory than to be a celebration and is thus something meant to refresh in the way other forms of play refresh. In the Catholic tradition at least, this highest work is itself the highest form of play.
The equations governing quarks admit negative energy solutions, which we interpret as antiquarks. Chemistry typically uses non-relativistic quantum mechanics which only have positive energy solutions (like classical mechanics).

The solutions in chemistry are wavefunctions. Wavefunctions give a complex number to each point in space so they may interfere constructively or destructively to give complex numbers of greater and smaller magnitude respectively. The Schrödinger equation can be solved for each atom independently to get one electron wavefunctions named atomic orbitals, and, in molecular orbital theory, these atomic combined to give molecular orbitals which are one electron wavefunctions for the molecule. When the atomic orbitals add up constructively to give a molecular orbital with a higher electron density between the atoms it's a bonding molecular orbital, otherwise it's anti-bonding.

Both quarks and anti-quarks can spin in two ways (even though this spin is not a conventional spin but something special to quantum). When a quark and an antiquark are produced, spin must be conserved, so in pair production each must have opposite spin so the total is zero.
It doesn’t. There are just ways to tell because private mode restricts certain APIs, so you can check against limits.
> SSO isn't a premium or differentiator feature, it's table stakes.

Not for B2C, hobby projects, very small businesses. That's why it's great as a differentiator: because it separates the wheat from the chaff. And is often non-trivial as the number of integrations grows. Hence the SSO middleware market.
I decided to try every integer denominator less than 1,000,000 to see how rare this is.

A few fun facts:

Constraining denominators to 4 digits (<10,000) there are NO better fractions than 355/113.

Constraining denominators to 5 digits (<100,000) and excluding multiples (eg. 710/226), 1601 fractions exist which better approximate pi than 355/113.
The best is 312689/99532 which is off by 2.914335439641036e-11

Considering denominators up to 6 digits <1,000,000 and excluding multiples, there are 162,141.
The best is 3126535/995207 which is off by 1.1426415369442111e-12

This was done somewhat subptimally with a potentially buggy implementation in python.

It's in a gist here: https://gist.github.com/thecadams/df3e12571294e3f7a9f5c07e91...
I guess I could have reworded my rewording better. My multiple experiences with burnout were preceded by boredom, but I guess my burnout isn't the same as your burnout, or others' burnout. I define burnout as just not giving a f*ck anymore, not caring if the project succeeds or fails, or if I get fired. I don't know what others' burnout is like.
> the single parameter that already exists,

Ok I concede. It is a single parameter that contains a millions of subparameters, at least one for each galaxy. Against three parameters, each of which is a single number. But it is three parameters!
That's 3x more parameters! Moreover, we had a problem and we had to increase the number of parameters by 50%. So yeah One parameter is much, much better, especially since we have never changed that it's one parameter.
"It makes my brain hurt" or "I think other people could be offended by it".
There's been a few other great ones as well that I can think of:

- No Country for Old Men

- Django Unchained

- True Grit

- Brokeback Mountain
Several large corporations as well as the US federal government law enforcement agencies know when you arrive and leave, all the time.

A bunch of small/private companies do too, because your client IP on the background app refreshes from
your phone changes from residential isp to mobile phone isp.

Amazon is the least of the worries on that front.
"lp0 on fire" and "PC LOAD LETTER" are two good ones, too.
"Irreplaceable" is not accurate, since as you said, the big issue is with high latency and low-bandwidth channels.

In the same city with a good connection, video is often about as good.
I had to whitelist pdst.fm on my pihole a while back to get downloads working.
I had a full 4 hour neuropsych test done as the result of a concussion. The test I was bad at was where they read you a list of random words and test your ability to retain immediately and after spaced repetitions. The first time I heard it I retained very little but on subsequent repetitions what I did learn I retained. So like a very specific sort of being bad at something. The rest of the tests were all in decently high percentiles.
Right, but it's better to be able to point to the data set and explain why its entanglements with wealth, geography, culture, etc. Fundamentally, hiding data doesn't just hinder people trying to use it to make racist claims. It's also depriving people of the ability to disprove those claims by pointing out how interconnected that data is with other factors. And so in the end, it ends up making it easier for the racist claims to go unrefuted.
I feel like the author is assuming here that the reader knows this is how Neptune was discovered and that the procession of mercury caused by relativity was long thought to be caused by a hidden planet. A very literal example of something thought to be missing matter that instead was a modified Newtonian theory.
This is the opposite as my experience. I find it hard to interrupt or even interject over zoom because it’s so hard to time.
Are you talking about Liouville numbers?

Liouville numbers are numbers which can be "best approximated by rational numbers" in a certain sense.

A number x is a Liouville number if for every integer n>0, there exist integers (p,q) such that 0<|x-p/q|<1/q^n

No algebraic numbers have this property, therefore all of the Liouville numbers are transcendental. However! The reverse is not true; not all transcendental numbers are Liouville. Neither pi nor e are Liouville numbers.
I'm not sure if what you're talking about has anything to do with the article. It sounds like you're just making a flippant comment based on the title of the article (please correct me if I'm wrong). From the article:

> Most states have arbitrary cutoffs for kindergarten entry, with children who do not reach a given age by a certain date required to wait a year. In 18 states, children who will turn 5 before Sept. 1 can enter kindergarten in the year that they turn 5; children who will turn 5 after Sept. 1 must wait until the next year. So in states with Sept. 1 cutoffs, in any given class, August-born children will usually be the youngest and September-born children the oldest.
These arbitrary cutoffs have important implications for the diagnosis of A.D.H.D.
You're being paid so you can't claim to be outraged at being told to work. If your morale issues aren't handled by your salary then you should simply leave. Investigate contracting.

If you need convincing to return the the office you were hired to work in then you probably aren't the type of employee a boss would want to retain.
To be fair, he's not hiding his name or anything, so he's upholding his end of the non-anonymity part.
The article very clearly was pointing out that the performance advantage of postgresml comes from the architecture. Hell, they are even using the same exact algorithm. What benefit is to be had from benchmarking the same algorithm on the same architecture? Do we also need to make sure Teslas have internal combustion engines when we compare their performance to ICE cars?
Wikipedia is anyone can edit. It wouldn't be the first time someone did something like that.
Further in their methodology they wrap a microservice around python and redis (which is doing an unmarshalling from redis and a marshalling to json) but they're not doing that with postgres.

In fact, as far as I can tell, postgres is not running as a microservice here. The data still has to be marshalled into some output other services can use.
The distribution of stress-energy is a single parameter per point in space. That is, I don't think saying "it's only a single parameter" and "it's different in different galaxies" are compatible.
Well, imagine nginx plugin that runs XGBoost. Or even standalone Rust/C++ microservice which provides XGBoost via standard http interface. The data might come from filesystem, or loaded from network location on startup/reload and kept in memory.

Basically, postgresql is a stateful service, and stateful services are always major pain to manage -- you need to back them up, migrate, think about scaling... Sometimes they are inevitable, but that does not seem to be the case here.

If you have CI/CD set up, and do frequent deploys, it will be much easier and more reproducible to include models in build artifact and have them loaded from filesystem along with the rest of the code.
The rampant sexual abuse perpetrated by Catholic priests is a function of a couple things, but chiefly among them was the cultural moment and who, exactly, was entering Seminary at that time. You can trace back the overwhelming majority of abusers to specific cohorts. Not trying to get conspiratorial about it, it’s just a fact that this was something boomer priests did and they all joined the Church during the sexual revolution in the 1970s.

Not really sure I have a point other than to say modern Catholics are quite aware of what people think about the Church and waffle between being dismissive (because critics genuinely don’t understand it) or reactionary.
> It is a single parameter that contains a millions of subparameters, at least one for each galaxy.

No, it's a single parameter with a distribution in space and time. It's the same one we already have to vary in space and time anyway based on our observations of light. Dark matter just means adjusting the same distribution further based on observed motions even if we can't see the source of gravity that is producing the motion.

If MOND actually gave the choice of adjusting a single parameter in place of having to adjust the distribution of matter and energy, that would be one thing. But, as I noted in another comment upthread, once you take into account that the theory of gravity we are using is actually General Relativity, not Newtonian gravity, there is no such single parameter anyway. Relativistic versions of MOND actually end up looking just like dark matter: they have to invent new fields, new forms of energy, for which we have no other evidence. There is no way to get the desired effect in GR by just tweaking a parameter in the law of gravity.
Enjoy the discount on blue chip stocks
> your speech causes harm, you should have to make it right

Could you define “harm”?
Employee-only with strict TOS so it's hard to tell how cherry-picked these videos are.
I don't have any special insight here but, in other cases, environmental reviews and environmental lawsuits are tools used to stifle new developments.

> a rejected San Francisco apartment complex...required a more than 1,110-page environmental assessment [1]

It is not socially acceptable to charge a million dollar permit for constructing a toilet. It is socially acceptable to make the process so onerous that it costs more than a million dollars to complete. Think of the environment.

[1] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2022-04-20/the-landm...
I think to win, you have to find commonalities enough people share to get them to vote for you. You just have to find your tribe.

We should all be more politically active - look at what happens when only the idiots do it.
Same here for Windows, I believe I got this one https://github.com/tailscale/tailscale/issues/5531
If you want to say it's a "parameter distribution" or something like that, that's fine. It doesn't change the fact that this thingie, whatever you want to call it, is already present in our existing theory of gravity, GR, and is already adjustable in that theory. So we're not adding anything new to the theory if we adjust this thingie to take into account observed motions for which we can't see the gravity source that causes the motion.
Your comment was flagged because you're arguing against a strawman of liberal ideology.

If someone holds your views, then you don't need to convince them.

If someone doesn't hold your views, then you haven't given them any more information.

In either case, it doesn't move the conversation forward. All it can do is provoke a pointless argument. Hence, flagged.
The stem cell research ban was to assuage religious people. This I understand, the last thing I want is some insurance company saying I need to pay 10x because of my genes.
Buying stock at a steep discount.
When Go is discussed, you’ll often hear people throw around the acronym CSP. Often in the same breath it’s lauded as the reason for Go’s success, or a panacea for concurrent programming. It’s enough to make people who don’t know what CSP is begin to think that computer science had discovered some new technique that magically makes programming concurrent programs as simple as writing procedural ones. While CSP does make things easier, and programs more robust, it is unfortunately not a miracle. So what is it? What has everyone so excited?

CSP stands for “Communicating Sequential Processes,” which is both a technique and the name of the paper that introduced it. In 1978, Charles Antony Richard Hoare published the paper in the Association for Computing Machinery popularly referred to as ACM.
We don’t exactly know what the inside of a black hole looks like. It’s infinitely curved space so it’s potentially quite big. One theory is the space inside a black hole expands at the speed of light. You can’t leave because you can’t go fast enough to get out.

We know that if you have a big enough black hole that the space near the singularity no longer shreds matter. But would it matter if a sun came through intact or a sun’s worth of material came in, condensed, and went supernova?

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/140218-bl...
Your implicit claim that the only thing standing between two groups and genocide is scientific authority is wrong. The white-black iq gap has been public for decades. Those who build racist theories from this already exist. A few research papers will not create the explosion you are imagining.
YouTube premium doesn't skip in-content ad segments in videos. Sponsorblock does.
I dunno. Theoretically, it is both necessary and sufficient to escape on output. But programmers make mistakes. Perhaps escape-on-input can be understood as a sort of defense-in-depth strategy that people adopted in environments where they couldn't be sure that output would be reliably escaped.

For example, orgs with a large number of junior devs, using legacy template engines that don't escape by default (remember this is from 10 years ago) or, you know, when any of your data touches WordPress. The risk of occasional double-escaping might seem manageable compared to the risk of total compromise.
I think its sad that we have to frame it this way. This is just manners versus lack of manners.

Its not a different culture. Its a lack of culture.

There is no excuse for constantly interrupting people. Its disrespectful and counterproductive.

There is a bit of subtlety also in that interrupting in the middle of a word is more rude than in the middle of a sentence versus a paragraph.

If, for example, someone has completed the third sentence of a paragraph that is clearly wrapping up, and pauses longer before what apparently may be the fourth sentence, but the other person thinks they have already got the message, it might not necessarily be rude at all to start talking before the last (probably not really important) sentence comes out. Sometimes it depends on the context and how long the pause is.

Lack of common courtesy is unfortunately very common. That doesn't mean we should accept it without comment.
Is there a fully offline alternative that is anywhere near as accurate?
I agree. I have thought that in 200 years, people will look back at mental health care at this time with a mixture of horror and pity.
From a CO2 emissions reduction perspective, it seems far better to use green ammonia as a direct replacement for fossil-derived ammonia used in fertilizers.
If you already know 22/7 approximation, it's just a (0x10)^-1 correction in denominator. That is:

22/7 = 3 1/7 ==> 355/113 = 3 1/(7 + 1/16)

This means just memorizing 3 numbers. {3,7,16} and continued fraction format.
And yet, you'll still get sponsor segues.
The first two are just “apoptosis inhibitors”. Perfect if you want to grow your own tumors and cancers.
Do you understand the concept of overfitting?
And there is a reason for that as TJ’s and Aldi are owned by brother German companies, Aldi Nord and Aldi Sud, and both operate on the German grocery model.
2021, They were doing this before it was cool
Is "ñoqui" also a little bit of a pun, "no aqui"? (I speak basically no Spanish, but couldn't help notice the resemblance.)
Also a plus subscriber. The app is almost perfect, missing only a couple of features - custom artwork (a lot of Patreon podcasters use the same artwork for free & premium feeds) and tracking file uploads in the play history.
I’m not sure what point you’re making. Studying human genetics is naziism?