skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
As dumb as that whole saga is, I find it amusing that people think Twitter is actually honest in their filings about the amount of fake/bot accounts. Tech companies inflating account numbers is a tale as old as the internet itself.
Thanks! Each visitor sees their own order. The channel is based on the orderId so each visitor has a dedicated channel for their order.

I do plan to extend this demo and create a dashboard for the kitchen that shows all orders coming in.
CVE-2022-42889 Explotation, Detection and Mitigation
How about just engineering stuff to not have errors in the first place.

My toaster is a complex bit of engineering - it has thousands of parts which all work together to take power from the wall to make toast.

Yet it has no errors. It just does the job I ask it to do.

A computer on the other hand seems to have a lot of ways to fail, and does so nearly every day. I suspect everyone reading this comment has seen at least one error today. Can't we engineers make the software better so that these errors can't/don't happen?
"Benrarke" -> "Bernanke"
Sounds like you are looking for a self hosted ZeroTier or Tailscale.
I tried and no, it's not there yet. I guess that'g good.
Increasingly I'm convinced that the signifiers only demonstrate meaning in a shorter-term sense. They aren't nothing, but someone in their 20's is mostly whatever they've been groomed for. And good grooming can definitely "set you up for life", except that as a survival strategy it relies on staying in your lane and playing to win precisely the kinds of social games you were taught you should be playing.

Nothing's wrong with winning like that - we seem to gravitate towards the behavior when there is social competition - but it just isn't the same as surviving. Someone can be brilliant, athletic, held in high esteem, and die young in a self-inflicted car crash. Personal survival is the ultimate filter but only manifests over the course of decades; someone at 20 "has potential" simply because they haven't been cut down yet. And each time a generational cohort narrows itself down a little, some of the people left over become winners by default, and consequently have more room to define what winning looks like based on their own experiences as survivors, which has upsides(raw experience) and also downsides(survivorship bias). I think that's a major differentiator in the young elite's success from that of older people with more modest backgrounds; the older cohort survived until opportunity appeared, the younger ones had a maximum of opportunities dangled near them from the beginning.

There's a definite limit to how much opportunity can go around at any given moment, and much of it is because of how society currently coordinates itself, not an intrinsic limit on our resources. But in terms of "sufficiently smart and motivated given the chance", it's mostly about that near-term readiness to step in and play a highly specific role that unlocks the access to resources, not their overall level of development as a human; being the best and being good enough are not that far apart. There are tons of people that sideline themselves from ambition because they'd just rather not.
Understood, but to an extent retirement isn't a choice. At a certain age I will find it harder to get a job and harder to do most things.

You also have the concept of compounding interest. A year of savings at age 30 is much more valuable than a year of savings when I'm 60.
This would be a win for capital over labor. Make your own conclusions.
> It's basically been disproven at this point that simply lowering cost does not necessarily lead to better outcomes for the country.

After untangling the double-negative, this is equivalent to saying: "It's basically been proven at this point that simply lowering cost necessarily leads to better outcomes for the country."

Is this in fact what you meant? The rest of your comment suggests you may believe the opposite.
I have noticed the same thing in multiple fora. Anytime there's any discussion involving brave, the comments are swarmed by rather vocal and hardcore fans and usually the discourse devolves into pretty extreme shilling.
It might be a bit uncharacteristic, but it still doesn't change the fact saying commutes have to be a minimum of 30 minutes isn't true. Its not entirely out of the ordinary to have a <30min commute. Most people in my office have a <15min commute, with a few having a similar commute as mine (~5min by car). My wife's commute is 12-15min. Most of my friends have a 15-20min commute.

Many people have commutes much less than 30 minutes. Maybe 30 minutes is an average, I'd probably agree average commutes are close to 45 minutes, but that's an average not a minimum. Those words have two very different meanings.
In my company, we have observed that work from home has increased productivity in short term. But true collaborations have actually decreased. Often, in office, you would have coffee breaks/lunch with people from different departments, or talk with someone from other departments for may be 5 minutes. And we have noticed that these kind of low-cost interactions are greatly decreased during Work From Home as much because of discoverability as anything else. The effect this has on the company as a whole is that, we get less cross-pollination of ideas between different departments and therefore reduced potential for future growth.

Having said that, if you are in an environment where interactions not related to your personal responsibility is mostly negative interaction, then it is understandable that work from home is better. So, in short, I would like to say that, if a company has a healthy interaction between different departments, then work from office is better for the company without much loss of time to the employees. However, in other cases, employees might prefer work from home.

This of course can change from employee to employee. Some employees might prefer work from office because they have positive interactions with rest of office colleagues and other will prefer work from home.

*EDIT*: I should have led with this. In my office, we have 2 people per office room. So, we have enough privacy if needed.
Analysis: Japan rushes to rearm with eye on 2027 – and China's Taiwan ambitions
I have not been paying attention but has Yudkowsky done anything noteable since these writings from 10+ years ago?
I'm with you, Sam. I loved going to my office, loved my commute (by bicycle or by train and walking), loved separating home from work life. And now I recognize that is probably gone forever.

My guess is that we are giving up more than we realize by losing the actual human interaction. Same way that being glued to our phones keeps us from interacting with people. Not sure how this ends, but guessing "not well".

I'm 50 years old and my career is very much winding down. And I'm extra-glad about that given what tech work has become.
That's just factually not true. Yes, the presidential election is fucked because the electoral college means that >70% of americans' votes are meaningless, but at the state and local level elections make a HUGE difference. And yes, that's not ideal, but it's a bit flippant and defeatist to write off all elections just because the presidential elections are screwed up.
So when will Cato just go full-on globalist neoliberal and demand that weapons production should not be a national concern? Maybe we can contract out production of F-35 engines to China, and close that plant in Vermont that Congressperson Bernie Sanders lobbied so hard for? Or maybe ULA's production facility in Alabama, a gift to Congressperson Richard Shelby, could be moved to Honduras to take advantage of the cheap labor costs?

Yes, higher domestic labor costs mean less profits to distribute to the entities that finance the Cato Institute. Regardless, regional realities mean that shortening supply line for critical necessities is a wise move in an increasingly unstable world (that instability being due to well-known factors like resource starvation, climate destabilization, population pressure, etc.).

This doesn't mean that well-regulated global trade isn't a benefit to all partners, it just means that trade in things like luxury items (whose loss from local economies doesn't cause critical failures) is quite different from trade in fundamental necessities (whose loss does).

As far as the Jones Act, here's a good counterargument to Cato:

https://www.defensenews.com/opinion/commentary/2020/06/05/wh...

To imagine life without this law, consider the risks we would face if foreign-owned companies were allowed to conduct our domestic trade during this pandemic. Foreign companies would be able to influence the flow of domestic goods and resources that are keeping our economy afloat. Thousands of now-secure American jobs throughout our shipbuilding and maritime workforces would be threatened, and foreign governments could gain even more undue leverage over our economy.
Can you point to research showing this? Except outside Somalia 10-15 years ago when the international community stepped in.

Piracy is mostly handled by local governments and is hugely dependent on their strength and international cooperation.

https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Security/Pages/Piracy-Reports...
Hm am I incorrect in my interpretation that what you're talking about is a kind of 'relaxation/rewarding oneself' after 'pushing oneself/working hard'?

What I'm talking about is a synthesis of play and work, where work becomes play, as opposed to playing, resting, or relaxing, after or as a 'reward for' work (which would not qualify as immediate reward. Immediate reward = in a fraction of a second.)

The 'work itself is the reward' if one carefully chooses what the work entails.
"your post is glib to the point of reductiveness"

How so? He lies constantly about many things. He is essentially a con artist at this point.
I have attended meetings with people who had to remain muted the entire time due to their kid screaming at the top of their lungs constantly. Its not great
Yeah, I don’t think excess COVID deaths are driving life expectancy either. It’s the two things I listed in my comment, both of which are getting worse with time and are affecting people earlier and earlier.

Although I’ve heard anecdotal evidence that COVID infection does damage cardiovascular health.
Hey that's great, thankyou - even if it's not 100% you've given me a leg up to start looking into it further some rainy afternoon.
Suse (the company) has double the revenue of Canonical. Fair to say plenty of people in the real world rate it.
This markdown based daily tweet scheduler uses git and GitHub Actions to post tweets on your behalf

https://github.com/reidjs/markdown-tweet-scheduler
I'm not the same person, but I have a similar philosophy. HN tends not to link to sites with really bad ads. If I find that it happens, I just close the tab. I don't intentionally have a whitelist of websites, but in practice maybe I practically do.
I'm on track with retirement and savings, but do you know what would put me immediately off track? an unpaid sabbatical with bad health insurance.
I think Musk is operating under his maxim that the survival of humanity trumps all. There is a tiny risk that the war in Ukraine escalates into a global nuclear war. Thus, from the point of view of the maxim, any and all sacrifices are valid if they mitigate this risk to nothing.

The problem, which I don't think Musk sees clearly, is that the outcome of this war has larger implications than just the fate of Ukraine. Other authoritarian nations, including China, are observing with keen interest how the conflict pans out. These nations, like Russia, follow a behavioral pattern of exploiting perceived weakness. An unlikely nuclear war avoided today at the cost of letting Russia win does significantly increase the risk of world war and thus nuclear war 7-15 years down the road.
Ukraine’s Air Force downs four out of six Russian cruise missiles and 10 drones
Stay away from Indian EdTech startups though, if you can.
Side effects also include going bald, so consider carefully
How does the strong force bind neutrons to protons? Is it connecting the quarks inside the proton with those of the neutron?
> It's a fantastic thing that Mozilla isn't suggesting that any of these changes be made to your browser then isn't it.

When a browser vendor advocates for "amplifying factual voices", in my mind's eye I see a browser tab filled entirely with a well-styled notification: "This site may contain misleading or harmful information. It has been blocked for your safety."

But I'm sure there'll be an about:config setting to bypass it and it only gets reset every two or three updates.

Mozilla should stay in their lane. -No, that's not accurate. Mozilla should get back in their lane. Maybe then they can finally find the time to finish implementing all the APIs that they removed without replacement with the Quantum rewrite.
Lots of options in Awesome SelfHosted: https://github.com/awesome-selfhosted/awesome-selfhosted#wik...

Checkout Bookstack
https://www.bookstackapp.com/
Agreed on all points. The fact is, the Nissan Leaf (the car used in this article) is insufficient for any sort of road tripping. It's fine for intra-city travel but using it for roadtrips will cause pain like OP experienced.

Most importantly, the Nissan Leaf still uses the antiquated CHAdeMO connector for fast charging... which is both becoming more difficult to find these days, but also cannot provide as high of power as the most traditional CCS1 (or, Tesla's Supercharger network), which results in extremely slow charge times compared to other standards.

Obviously, the OP also didn't even use DC fast charging... but that appears to be because they chose go via a route that has no DCFC between the two cities. Both cities have DCFCs in each city, so if you could make the drive in one charge (which, almost every modern EV can... BESIDES the Nissan Leaf), then you'd be fine.

Funny enough, if you look at the route in Plugshare... the only company that has any sort of DCFCs inbetween those two cities is Tesla. There's a Supercharger that is directly inbetween the two cities.
Yeah, sure!

The first ones that come to mind are:

- Searching for travels: I might want TripAdvisor (things to do and top restaurant pages), Youtube, Images, Skyscanner, Maps, Booking, Airbnb. Ideally, I would want some blogs with places to visit and things to do, but I understand there is no single good source for this (as far as I know).

- Searching for restaurants: I might want TripAdvisor, Images, Maps, The Fork.

- Searching for tech in general: StackOverflow, HN, Youtube, TechCrunch, Medium, IndieHackers.

- Searching for learning: Udemy, Coursera, FreeCodeCamp, Youtube, Google Scholar

In the examples above, I just mentioned some examples that could be useful to me, the key thing (as I mentioned it in another comment) is to be able to customize these columns, both in source (add/remove) and order, plus the width of these columns. I'm sure there are a lot of people out there with a lot of awesome ideas for profiles.

I really think this could be a great search engine experience.
I love the way it finds features and labels the picture. It thinks I am a meteorologist!
Ah ok. The way you're describing it reminds me a lot of Acid Pro, which went from Sonic Foundry to Sony to Magix where it seems to have disappeared. It's still available apparently, but I have yet to meet anyone who uses it (or has even heard of it!)

There was a time when it was all the rage. How things change.
Because we are humans. If I say “see you in a year” that doesn’t mean a year to the second.
Your source doesnt support your narrative.

> What accounts for the larger labor force withdrawals among less-educated women than men during the pandemic? It is complex but there seems to be a consensus that it partly reflects how women are overrepresented in certain health care, food preparation and personal service occupations that were sharply curtailed at the start of the pandemic. Although women overall are more likely than men to be able to work remotely, they are disproportionately employed in occupations that require them to work on-site and in close proximity to others.

> It is less clear whether women’s parental roles and limited child care and schooling options have played a large role in forcing them to exit the labor market. The number of mothers and fathers in the labor force has declined in similar fashion over the past two years.
Something like https://www.otis.com/en/us/products-services/products/ems-pa... may be the place to start.

I know you can program them to "idle" on different floors depending on time of day, and prioritize certain floors (e.g., try to always have one ready to go on the ground floor).

I wouldn't be surprised if you could find systems that integrate with hotel doors, and when a hotel door is opened and the light turned off on floor ten, it works to get an elevator sent to floor ten.
This is very good. I'm going to start using this first and see how it goes.
But, would you want the burned out brewers, fire watchers, or goat herders placed in your development team for 6 months at a time?
Then thats on you. Our team collaborates with three time zones. There was never full work from the office. Yet we still collaborate fine and share these things when we meet over zoom. Maybe your group should have a regular meeting where if people want to sign up and share what they’ve been working on they may do so. We were doing that even when our side of the group was in person because thats about the only way to get the full scope of someones work: a 45 min end to end presentation where you can ask questions, not chitchat in the hallway.
Increasing I think there’s a fundamental divide between people who like working from an office and those who prefer remote work.

Instead of anyone trying to meet in the middle, it seems more optimal for companies (or teams/departments) to say, hey, this job position is going to be permanently remote/hybrid/in-person. Remote employees can work from the office if they want, but it won’t be expected. Similarly totally in-person people can work from home occasionally, with exceptions.

There just doesn’t seem to be any point in arguing that people who don’t like remote work should, or vice versa. A lot of these conversations turn into holy wars where people say there’s something inherently wrong with a preference one way or the other, and I don’t see why.
Disagree. It would be a win for labor over capital.
I've been doing RE work off and on for about twenty years. IDA is a solid tool with some really neat features[1], but the only reason I use it anymore is if I need to look at a binary that's for an architecture so obscure that Ghidra doesn't support it yet.

I like Ghidra's interface better, but I'm also not a keyboard-first type of user. I work with a lot of different OSes and software. I stopped trying to remember most keyboard shortcuts 10+ years ago, because there were too many variations, and the consequences of using the wrong one can be dire.

Releasing and open-sourcing Ghidra was a truly magnificent gift by the NSA, and I can't thank them enough for it.

[1] I'd love to see a Ghidra equivalent of Lumina, for example.
Is the binding energy made up of gluons?
these are parent cards,they are supposed to be filled out, and kept safe at home.

this is preparation for mass casualty events of all sorts, perhaps even war on US soil.
It's protectionist - yes. Pointless... there's good reason for it when it was written.

The domain is cabotage ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabotage ). Note that many countries have cabotage laws of one sort or another.
> especially given they probably live in a relatively small apartment.

Yeah, I can very much sympathize with people... some of my ex-colleagues in fact... who lived in small apartments (and even shared apartments with others) during the COVID forced work from home times. Oh and people with kids, especially small ones...

A lot of people in nice cities intentionally choose cheaper apartments at the expense of space because they expect they won't be home all the time. Suddenly being trapped in your small space could be like a prison sentence.
Virtual pinball has a tiny fraction of the physical behavior of real machines. There are tons of subtleties that are still beyond the scope of what anyone has implemented virtually.

Balls have all sorts of behavior that goes beyond the typical X-Y coordinates implemented virtually. They spin and slide across the playfield with all sorts of varying degrees and forces. Their motion is very 3d even on a 2d playfield - a moving ball can have a spin axis aligned anywhere on its sphere, and spin at any rate compared to its horizontal motion, and recognizing and handling that is very much a component of advanced play.

Flippers and kickers also have immense subtleties to their behavior. One that no simulation yet gets right is the softness of the rubber on the flipper - balls sink into that rubber by a fraction of a millimeter, and rebound in different ways based on that. Besides that, there are tons of details about how the flipper accelerates and decelerates on a time scale of milliseconds, that an experienced player can feel on a real machine.

Timing also matters. Flipper inputs on a computer are almost always constrained for input timing resolution by the host hardware and OS platforms, typically to a 1/60 second frame rate. Real machines respond hard real time instantly, in under 1 ms. This matters quite a bit too for the degree of control you have over the game.

And of course there's nudging a machine, which has infinite degrees of freedom for direction and intensity (push, slide, shove, slap) that can't be replicated by any virtual controller.
This announcement quintuples the huh? factor on the question I already had, namely:

the fuck hell is the difference between USB4 and Thunderbolt 4??
I think what we're discovering is that there is a fundamental difference between some people. One set of terminology might be 'introverts vs extroverts'.

We are operating in a legacy mode of operation where those people were mixed up because it didn't matter - there was only one way of working so the fact that it was worse to some people than others was irrelevant.

I think the 'mixed' mode we're in now is probably a transition phase. Companies will move towards being more one or the other and employees will gravitate to companies whose ethos matches their own.
"Attenuation" is a decrease. Gain is an increase. I may not understand the nuances of virology-speak, but: When we talk about GoF research as a dangerous activity, it is dangerous because a virus got better able to infect and hurt humans or other animals. Therefore if it escaped the lab, we'd be faced with a new, more dangerous pathogen, then if the research had not gone ahead.

This research seemed to accomplish that, unless I'm missing something, which I might well be. But if we're nuancing the definition of GoF to say this research was not GoF, then I think we've lost track of what the concern was in the first place.
EasyList Cookie already contains a section to address this, using uBO syntax.[1]

Best is to report such instances to EasyList maintainers so that a fix will benefit everybody using the list.

* * *

[1] https://github.com/easylist/easylist/blob/master/easylist_co...