skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't believe the meaning is unclear. The OP asserts that a large number of minority voters and women voted republican in the last two trump elections. Do you take issue with the premise? Do you consider the finding not to be meaningful?

FWIW as far as I can tell, the OP is correct in that 55% of white women, 36% of hispanic men, and 30% of hispanic women voted for trump. It was also telling that in the 2020 election support for the republican party from all minority groups increased by a few percentage points. I think that counts as "SO many". It's not a majority, but I don't think the OP claimed that.

[1] https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-54972389
Google already has this internally.
What's the point in having another systemd distro when there's already Red Hat Inc? /s
I'm not sure mainstream development practices would automatically benefit from mimicking the ones used for such an extreme scenario
Let’s go ahead and see an AI trained on Bill Lumbergh character, yeah, right.
Is it a strawman if the editorial referenced by the article basically holds GP's point (as I remember it at least, I can't see it now)

>In creating this guidance, we took as a starting point the first article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights — humans are “free and equal in dignity and rights”[0]

This document was written before the discovery of the double helix. How can we take it as a starting point? I think the flagged post was perhaps flame-baity, but I don't think the point you're making is so cut and dry. As I remember it, GP's argument was that liberal ideology holds the equalness of all people as a fundamental truth rather than a result of inquiry. That seems to be what is happening in reputable scientific jounals.

[0] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-022-01443-2
Who is stack overflow for in 2022?
If you're a noob who's learning, then your question will be downvoted to hell and u will be blocked as question is deemed low quality..

If you're a pro, then your question will be about something obscure which the mods don't understand, and also will require a more nuanced answer, so it will be downvoted to hell and u will be blocked.

So it's aimed at mid-level devs to ask things with certain answers, the kind of answer which would most likely be found in documentation. So the people who require help/answers the most are kicked off, whereas people who need answers/help the least are encouraged.
In theory there is no real impediment to largely indistinguishable cloud gaming platforms using edge datacenters. Of course, Microsoft's ecosystem has resulted in depence on battlestations over tablets and laptops for gamers.
Programmers depend on non-system libraries largely these days.
The point is less mess & hassle freeness. And the ability to load it into RAM, and have it running from there, without effort, because it was made with that use-case in mind, among others.

$ uptime
07:21:39 up 128 days, 21:23, 3 users, load average: 0.38, 0.54, 0.60

The above is MX-Linux actually, but doesn't really matter, because they use the same framework, and the default image contains more stuff, while Antix is more 'spartan'.
Tell me about your kids, your weekend, etc. and I will listen. We can grab lunch even. But we aren't hanging out after work, going to bars, coming over to my house, I don't want to go to theirs, etc.
What other example has a similarly low denominator but gives as good or better accuracy than 355/133? I’m under the impression that there aren’t any such examples.
I worked for a startup in the early 2000s that got funding and moved into a nice new office building being subleased by an oil company. And odd requirement of signing the lease was that they had to hire and keep on an IT manager that used to work for the oil company. That guy did absolutely nothing all day and spent most of his time drunk. To this day I have no idea why they agreed to such a thing just for office space.
Remember that this is the same company that did this:
https://archive.ph/DSL4x
Microbenchmarking Intel’s Arc A770
Now spend time with career women and realize that a stay at home dad is not even considered a man worth talking. Women want their vake and eat it too but the one baking it should always be the man.
That's kind of assuming a lot. What if instead, in a hypothetical future, we all collectively discovered that one's efficacy in today's society depends on their ability to match their brain type to their job and certain types of jobs that certain types of brains depend on are going away, we might be able to structure society with the correct share of jobs between all people and shift into a state where everyone can be efficacious! Hypothetically, it wouldn't even be the first time humanity decided to map brain types with social roles in order for everyone to get their fair share and be efficacious! What a shame, because that would require all the good people of the world to overcome their malignant shame and actually do research into the issue.

Although, I have to agree with you in that the people currently leading the charge don't seem to have everyone's best interests in mind.
Maybe dark matter does have electromagnetic interactions with normal matter, but they are at an exceedingly high (or low) frequency. Science has limits in what frequencies it can probe, matter may not have the same limitations. A century long EM wave would look like background noise on a human scale. Petahertz (and beyond) vibrations could have extremely short range interactions that mostly occur in the near field.
Seems like I've found one. Still not FOSS.

https://www.hanwhasecurity.com/product/xnd-9082rf/
k.

- Human worker.
Some real anxiety in the comments here. I personally think this is a positive situation - one which could have been avoided if real human managers had a hint of empathy, humility, and understanding of their job : to be human conduits to a mechanical system.

I have had 3 or 4 great real human managers in my career. But that also includes at least a dozen horrible troll-drones. They deserve it. Give me nothing, get nothing. Even the real human ones were just buffering whatever they could before I quit.
I’m sorry to hear that. Look, I’m not sugarcoating this one: if you think you won’t break the loop, then you will be like that forever. Maybe lets start small by: reading a book (for me, Becoming Steve Jobs was the book that saved my life when I was unemployed), taking a walk everyday (helps you think and clear your head), spend time with close friends or family or partners or whoever believe in you. Good luck, and I’m on your side! The world doesn’t like underdogs like you and me, but we need not to accept that.
For combinatorial optimization, there is now NVIDIA cuOpt, which is ridiculously fast: https://developer.nvidia.com/cuopt-logistics-optimization

Ceres can use GPUs for some solver bits too, I believe.
I’m having trouble reading this comment as sincere, even though I think it probably is. You’re not trolling?
What if one was to prevent the managers from physically interacting with people. Basically a work from home manager without the video conferencing. He may only respond in predefined ways or define such ways. Whatever tasks remain that really seem to require a human can be done by consultants and some new job title.
He didn't claim that.
Visited the San Juan Islands this summer. Super beautiful up there. The Brits certainly had the better camp.
last time this offer a reason people to do their racism behaviour, biologist had learned this and don't want to do it again soon.
woohoo, 4 day weekend!
I've got two problems with this.

First: if theory and observation don't match up, that can be due to lacking theory or lacking observations. Both should be investigated.

Second: all candidates for dark matter i know posit an enormous number of places where this dark matter is.

It is not that "dark matter solves this problem". It is a particular distributing of mass that solves the problem - typically, a highly specific distribution of mass. So not only is this theory supposing that most material in the universe is invisible to us, but its properties other than mass are unknown to us except it allows us to fill in the blanks exactly as needed.

E.g, we're not expecting a lot of dark matter black holes, as the hypothesised stuff doesn't even interact with itself and so cannot slow down. Basically, "dark matter" is fairy dust that physicists sprinkle over everything till it works.

And you know what: maybe that is the way to go. Probably it plays at least some part in answering these questions. But until we have a clearer picture, we may as well call it "magical fairy dust". That at least reminds us how much we're fudging.
Because devs will not update their Frobnicator for seventeen years, choosing to solve leetcode instead. Eventually the Frobnicator that the devs are using will be so security vulnerable the fact that the source code exists in the package repository is itself a CVE. Because you're a dev, when this happens it's a funny story, but for Bob it's seventeen meetings and having to listen to Franz, the director of development chew out the entire team as if they're utterly incompetent. This means Bob just disables your access to the rest of the systems unless you have a correct Frobnicator, and doesn't care whether he blocks you or not - because you would be complaining to your director either way.
Only counting white women is misleading but I can see the point there. But 36% is definitely not "SO many": it doesn't win an election of two parties, and that was the whole premise of GP.

>Do you take issue with the premise? Do you consider the finding not to be meaningful?

Just wanted some elaboration. It's a bold claim given with no data.
Oh boy, I would love to work for a company where my boss monitors me constantly then sends me a daily score! /s

There is a human element to managing people that AI simply cannot do. A boss (good or bad) can change his behavior based on anything from office rumor to the way you look on a certain day. He can decide to go easy on you for a while because he heard through someone else that your dog died last week. He can simply look at you and decide that you look depressed and pull you aside and ask you what's wrong.

Human interaction and relationships are so complex and nuanced that no AI is going to replace it for a long, long time - until we have proper AGI at least.

The only thing I see AI doing is putting some proofreaders and crappy graphic designers out of business.
Aside that the article said that "none of the studies I am referring to include inquiries into race or sex differences", so what?

It's not as if the research caused these people to have the views they have; they use it as a post-hoc justification. And more importantly it's not as if they can't do their own research, even if it's bad quality (or even fake). By remaining intentionally ignorant yourself you won't have a strong answer, and let the "MAGA and similar organisations" take the initiative and control the debate.

Besides, it's not as if reality is going to change just because we don't research it, and if we understand reality better we can maybe do better by everyone.
Never mind that governments are the ones who used similar data sets to murder their own citizens by the millions within living memory. The important thing is that we keep it out of Google's hands!

Do I basically have your position right?
So many companies make stupid, gratuitous changes that break perfectly acceptable browsers. For what? They're not making browsing any faster - no, instead, they're adding things that make the newest, fastest computers we can buy take a long, jerky pause when we click on something, or try to scroll too soon...

I think it's time to call out shitty web developers who are probably contributing to this because they want job security. The web doesn't need generation after generation of significantly different browsers every few years, nor do we need web sites that very literally take more RAM and more CPU resources than entire OSes.

It's all bullshit, and there's never a good reason for any web site to take hundreds of megabytes of memory and take seconds to do things on a machine that can do tens of billions of instructions per second.
Good luck Mr/s/ Maximalist, why would we need you in a future where AI can preach its own worth?
At age 10 that's a 10% advantage in life experience, growth, and social skills. Huge.
It's like we've learned nothing from the techno-optimist claim that work automation will give workers more free time to pursue their own desires.

In theory, it might be able to at some point. However, in reality, the claim ignores the power structures that the automation/AI/tech doesn't dissolve, but only reinforces.

Some people want to lord over other people, AI isn't going to make that go away without changing the power structures that let it happen.
From the CDC website:
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/vaccines-work/vaccineeffect.html

> Getting vaccinated yourself may also protect people around you, including those who are more vulnerable to serious flu illness, like babies and young children, older people, and people with certain chronic health conditions.

It reads that by getting yourself vaccinated, you may be protecting others. While it does not explicitly mention lowering transmission, I does seem implied. Otherwise, what else can it mean?
> there is now not only a direction that you cannot go in, you can't detect it is not there any more

You can still detect that it's there. You just can't go there.

> the only way through time is forward toward the singularity but it will take you forever to get there

That is not true. You will reach it in finite time.
> How will AI figure out how to properly mill a part to spec knowing that failures will end the contract?

Can that be solved by using something like an error budget?

I can imagine it being a heavy lift to account for measurements and tolerances, especially for "odd"-shaped parts.
Due to MMS/SMS messages getting hung I switched to YAATA for messaging people who do not have Signal. It is unfortunate Google is going to take exclusive control of SMS on Android with this RCS implementation. Just another "baked" in half-assed feature that android will permission wall its users from and support at the minimum level they can get away with. Now SMS can be natively as broken as notifications, face proximity sensors, file management, background service management, power management, and a myriad of other android "features" they refuse to fix.
Optimization is an iterative path-dependent problem, it's not particularly GPU-friendly.
Buying lottery tickets instead of a camera also has a slightly higher than zero probability of a positive outcome.

I wouldn’t doubt that a webcam (real or dummy) deters crime. I’ve looked hard for statistics on arrest rates for home property theft with security cameras, but propaganda/fearmongering from camera companies clogs up my search. Maybe you’ll have better luck.
Brains. One person may not be able to understand it might take teams.
And as robots replaced more jobs, more people would be going to bars.
It's perfectly possible and in fact quite pleasant to work with intellij inside google. At least for JVM languages.

Disclaimer: I work for google
The problem is that developers have no idea how to run systems at a scale larger than their local Mac and iPhone.
"A three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the design of the CFPB violated the Constitution because it receives funding through the Federal Reserve, rather than appropriations legislation passed by Congress."

If you want things to stay, get it in writing.
One gets interrupted by two kinds of people:

- Those who ask for help after exhausting other avenues. These people grow more productive over time.

- Those who ask for help at the first sign of trouble every time. These people take you for granted, use you as a door mat, and often make for incompetent teammates or toxic managers.
Thanks for the suggestion. Fantastic story!
Do you think there's something about the precise age (to within a few months) that a child begins school that drives this bias in diagnosis? Or would we have the same problem with a hard cutoff date, even if all kids started school an entire year later? Or is it largely a matter of how much development a child undergoes even in 1 month at such an age (eg, a combination of factors)?

I guess I ask because there will always have to be a cutoff, even if it's a soft cutoff.

As a non-parent, the best solution I can see is to give the parents the knowledge and freedom to make the choice, and to add this data to perhaps mitigate over-diagnosis (and any attached stigma).

Of course, as I write this out, it occurs to me how much of a burden on parents an extra year without school could be
The point is these are companies like Red Hat and Suse that "naturally" compete. Free software communities working on Linux distributions would be better off to join their forces. Just my opinion, though, of course they are free to do what they want as I am free to express my opinion on the matter.
>How is it going to convince Jack to switch his shift and come in to cover open on Sunday

Offer triple time taken from what otherwise would've been the human manager's pay?
> However I can see some orthogonal scenario where an "AI" run company

I don't think this can be done sustainably. AI can definitely run a company's operations, especially at scale. A fully AI-run company opens itself up to arbitrage of various sorts.
> Everything I listed was more than possible in 2010

Microsoft could have designed a processor like what was in the AirPods in 2010? Five years before Apple?

Besides, by 2010, Apple was already the best in the business at supply chain management and was manufacturing more high end devices than anyone in the world.

What high performance hardware was Microsoft shipping in 2010? The state of the art mobile hardware in 2010 was Apple’s ARM A4 - a 32 bit single core processor that ran from 800Mhz - 1Ghz. It could barely run Safari by 2011 let alone a full office suite.

> Have you actually read the book? His iPhone predictions had nothing whatsoever to do with the core ideas, excellent historical perspective and analysis provided in Innovators Dilemma.

He tried to apply his “low end disruption theory” from the 60s and he was completely wrong about Apple.
When you run into physics/astronomy people mentioning epicycles, it's not ironic, it's saying that we're missing out on a simpler rule.
Angel Guide
Founder's Angel Guide
A magician-mathematician revealed a casino loophole
When a gang of gambling cheats sussed out how to beat the house, they inadvertently highlighted a loophole from a shuffled deck. It took a magician-turned-mathematician to reveal how.
> It's not for displaying a webpage

The majority of of legitimate traffic to these txt files are by browsers(extensions) for the express purpose of displaying websites to a users specifications(without ads in this case).

A reasonably low estimate is that 20%-30% of global internet users are behind some kind of adblocker, almost all of which are default subscribed to easylists. So this txt file is potentially responsible for the way a BILLION+ internet users see and interact with near every single website.

Cloudflares claim that this isn't web content is full on reality warping. It only makes any kind of sense when masked under layers of abstractions and lawyer speak.

---

None this should even matter though, someone seeing the big picture at CF should have done the napkin math and realized that the easylist bandwidth pays for itself.

Ignoring the soft cushion of the huge amount of globally distributed caching of these files, if easylist suddenly stopped working for a week then global bandwidth usage could see a spike. A pretty little chunk of which CF may be on the hook to absorb at no cost.
How is that an example of AI replacing management? The AI might determine what to invest in and thus who the owners of a company are, but humans still need to make decisions for the company.
Middle managements primary job is making an employee feel supported, encouraged and empowered.

Guarantee an AI will be able to do none of that lol.

My first objective as middle management was always to bond on a personal level to some degree. I’d do this on a weekly basis to build trust:

- Talk about personal, but work appropriate topics — gardening, pets, sports, what have you.

- Discuss projects and objectives. Discuss concerns, things that went well, any support needed, etc

- discuss professional development (we’d outline these ahead of time). What progress is being made, how to go about achieving objectives, etc. often this was outside of work.

- discuss / mediate any interpersonal conflicts on the team

The most important aspect of my job as middle management was always the bonding. I doubt an AI can relate to gardening or getting a beer at a happy hour watching the local college football. Without that trust a team wouldn’t follow the AI.
I'm in the US, have android and use sms a lot, almost entirely to communicate with users of "dumb phones".

In fact, all the ios users I communicate with do it over whatsapp or telegram.

Today I had an ios user sms me asking if he could send me a voice message. I honestly have no idea if that would have worked but I directed him to whatsapp (that he already had installed) and it was frictionless thereafter. I expect I'll never see another sms from him again.
Without interruptions, I would not be able to finish meetings on time. EVER.

Information exchange is always the bottleneck in larger organizations, so efficiency of meetings is really important.

I will interrupt someone if I understood their point, and we have different, more pressing items on the agenda. It's not a power play, not psychological warfare or bullying. I just want to get shit done on time.
So a GUI for Nix?
Error -41: sit by a lake

https://xkcd.com/1024/
Good replies by others here. "crazy and destructive" that you have no idea about how computers work today, or how computers are still computers. Your ignorance about things like Sun workstations as it relates to literally everything today, I mean you have no idea about modern computing lol
I feel like a chatbot could do B just about as well and it scales.
Spotify pays up to 70% of their revenue to copyright holders.

So, your beef should be with them, not Spotify. Which you should already be aware of if you truly are a music producer.

However, it costs you nothing to bash Spotify. It may cost you your career to bash the actual greedy leeches who control the money flows in music.
Google glasses should be the warning here.

They never found a reason for it to exists.

Metaverse has reasons, sure. Sure you can meet with people. Sure you can play games. Sure the headsets are functional unlike glasses.

But to what extent?

People pull out their phones many times a day and scroll, and Mark benefits almost every time.

So far the Metaverse isn't compelling.

Why spend $400 on a headset for something you might use rarely? And that has no clear benefit above so many alternatives.
This is the kind of project you build when you realize your startup has no competitive advantage. You lose focus and just build pointless stuff like this and shoot it out into the void and hope something happens.
I'd much rather go to the Hoosegow than the Clink
Waterfall isn't a bad thing, but lowering agility and flexibility and adding time and frustration to the cycle by the means of process gates is a bad thing.
Okay, tell me how you do it much better in k8s
Most large-scale optimization outside of neural nets is bottlenecked by function evaluation