skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's also not cooridnating, indexing it, compairing it to others, selling that data, passing it on for blackmail purposes, or law enforcement purposes, etc. Additionally to reproduce the person's overall biometerics it is a very sloppy process and would be unreliable.
'The Waste Land' Reviewed (1923)
Only respect for this mad guy. Not only did he build it he also played it in public.
Yes, and this may very well be happening too. I believe the consensus has been established that the average was roughly -2 (meaning prior discrimination against girls in education), but individual teachers who were already better than average would be more liable to overcompensate.
This is so much better in the video than what I thought it would be from just the pictures. Which of course makes sense since it's Akesson. He's one of the people behind the Teenage Engineering Pocket Operators, after all.
> buying is basically arbitrage between the mortgage rate and the inflation rate

It's a play on rental yield, i.e. rent versus price. Inflation is relevant, but more precisely considered as the cost of capital (opportunity cost of your down payment plus lost/gained yield on the difference between ownership costs and rent). Everything else is adjustments. Whether it's financed with a mortgage or cash is important, but the fundamental analysis still holds.
> Engineering was all posturing: great hand-waving plans papered over nasty middle-management infighting. Hundreds of engineers in new glass-walled offices, producing plans.

Sounds a lot like a lot of FAANG companies today.
I'm not sure why your word-salad was a necessary response given that I explicitly said that they should remove illegal content where required.
Maximum Entropy and Bayes (2018)
I don't know, compassion and understanding and nuanced understanding of individual desires when talking to someone is not what I associate AI with in my mind, but being able to assess sociological and cultural taboos and try to what a patient actually wants rather then what they might initially express seems like something I good doctor would get to through explorative conversation.
That theory also guided the development of the EU, which has arguably been a significant source of peace and stability for the past 70 years, leading to great prosperity. This is only the second war we are seeing on the European continent in all that time. Compared with the previous 70 years it's quite an achievement.

It's a fallacy to focus on the one failure of the policy and ignore the other cases when it was working.

As for NATO its expansion all the way to the borders of Russia didn't prevent the war either, and it remains to be seen whether we won't end up with a war between Russia and NATO.

In times of war it's tempting but dangerous to feel like militarisation of the world is the solution. History doesn't show that to be the case in general.
Ask HN: Modern Introduction to ML?
I tried getting my head into machine leaning some five years ago, but it never stuck. The field has raced on since then; if I wanted to teach myself to understand what the significance of new advances is, and implement some toy stuff by hand, where might I start?
They are doing face recognition but not detection. It's always amusing when I go through google photos and it shows me complete strangers that I have in my photographs.
Since the topic here is Blink-182... I grew up listening to them and managed to go to a special show of theirs in a very small (for them) venue in NYC about 10 years ago. I'm optimistic about the future of VR, but the only aspect of that show that I think would benefit from it was the experience of getting to see the band members up close with just a general admission ticket, since they usually play giant arenas.

Everything else about it was a multi-sensory experience that I think would be totally flat in even the most advanced VR systems: the electric buzz running through the crowd at the opening notes to their biggest hit songs, the mass of people pressing together to get close to the stage, jumping up and down together to the beat, hundreds of others around you screaming along to the lyrics of their favorite songs, people crowd surfing, friends bringing over one too many rounds of beers, the band interacting with the crowd as a whole, feeding off the energy of the room...

Overall I'm not even a huge fan of live music, but it's hard for me to imagine a VR experience that captures all of the energy and human revelry of a great concert.
Not if the videos are in Hebrew. English and other languages have excellent support and tools that less common languages don't.
..And failing to find any evidence of collapse. Hence "can't be demonstrated". I didn't mean "can't be looked for" I meant that attempts to find it have not been successful.
We have the technology for virtual machines, and phones are pretty beefy these days. where's my Linux phone hypervisor with android guest?
Add

display: flex;
align-items: center;
margin: 1px;

To `.container div` to get the vertical centering in the OP comment and the slight border. https://jsfiddle.net/g4qv2dr6/1/

The border still kind of looks better on the table one, it's like the flexbox border is not the same size vertically and horizontally.

Once you add enough text that they need to re-shape, they both behave differently. I kind of like the look of the flexbox one better though.

Table https://jsfiddle.net/gs73eyd5/1/

Flexbox https://jsfiddle.net/g4qv2dr6/2/

Also they both break pretty badly if you put some content so long that would require an automatic line-break (make sure you scroll to the right to see) With flexbox the content overflows outside of the container, but it preserves the sizing of the other elements. Table expands the whole container but in doing so ruins the other two rows.

https://jsfiddle.net/ysu7fgk1/ vs https://jsfiddle.net/q6dcph0x/
What are you talking about? There is a Texas lawsuit about this against Meta: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/technology/texas-facebook...
Perhaps Nim will compile to Zig one day?
> Berkeley had two choices: spend a fortune adding closed captioning to the videos, or remove them from public view. Cost-conscious administrators chose the latter option.

There's no kind of "attack" here. It's UC Berkley refusing to spend money to add subtitles.
1=1 can be used to simplify the process of updating queries making easy to add, remove, and consistently modify conditions for a much faster process
You can't sell your own tickets if you want to play in a large venue. Those venues all have exclusive Ticketmaster agreements.
I'd like a mix, please...

20% of the tickets are sold in an auction or some ridiculous market like that.

And 80% of the tickets are sold on a non-transferable basis, in a lottery. (Where maybe you can buy a +1 ticket, but the first one is non-transferable.)

If a band wants a different mix of money vs luck, or the number of +1s you can bring, they can set it differently.
>> I found it very interesting that I haven't heard of this before. It seems pretty analogous to Fuse on Linux, and I wish there was more stuff built on it.

You might be interested in 9P: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9P_(protocol)
> Are cash buyers really 25% of the market in the US?

Not in the sense that they didn't finance part of the purchase, as I understand it. It just means the cash is already there from the point of view of the buyer.
A better question to start with is "where does the law fit into this?"

What is the material consequence of this action? How does this affect people's lives? Why is that something that needs legislation?

I'm not implying that there are no consequences, I'm curious how you interpret the issue.
This is truly bananas and wonderful. As an "old" that had a Vic-20 and a commie 64, this just warms the heart.
As far as I can tell, WIV (and other) researchers have left other restriction sites in final genomes, but not BsaI and BsmBI sites. That makes sense given the typical use of those two enzymes. So I'm inclined to agree there's nothing obviously special about that combination of restriction sites and spacings, which increases my concern that this is just a false discovery.

Jesse Bloom said he'd try reproducing with a wider range of natural viruses and potential synthetic assembly strategies. Unless and until that still gets an interesting p value, I'd agree this is oversold.
Most scientists either blindly accept collapse as a mechanism and then happily use the highly accurate math and don't care it isn't testable, or if they think about it at all they adopt something untestable like MWI and then happily use the highly accurate math and don't care it isn't testable. Thinking hard about testable theories in this area is incredibly slow progress and doesn't pay a lot of bills (https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/dec/06/peter-higgs-...)
In financial markets, this quirk of automatically-determined prices across different products is frequently called "mispricing" when those products logically should have a relationship with each other.

Straightforwardly: All hosts with space for a c6gd spot instance have space for a c6g instance. If Amazon is willing to host a c6gd instance in that slot for $X, they should be willing to also host a c6g instance there for $X.

In financial markets, the way this gets handled is through arbitrage: someone will buy the equivalent of the c6gd instance, and sell the c6g part for the higher price (they may also sell the "d" part for even more money). This has the effect of "correcting" the price. The AWS spot market does not allow you to do arbitrage, and AWS doesn't appear to do the arbitrage for you.

AWS probably likes this inefficiency in their market: some instance types are more popular than others, and some customers make assumptions that require them to use a very specific instance type (ie a c6gd would not work as a substitute for their c6g instance). However, the vast majority of users probably could work just fine if their c6g instance were a c6gd, and don't look for the arbitrage opportunity. That means Amazon gets paid extra.
This is a client library only (at least according to the title). There would need to be an equivalent server library implementation, not to mention all of the necessary non Wayland protocol code (libinput, drm, etc). Still the easiest means to port StumpWM would be to use c bindings for wlroots
The mispricing is likely good for Amazon. It indicates that most people aren't doing this arbitrage, so Amazon can milk them for extra money.
Well no. Its typical to sell in an inflated market and buy in a cheaper one. Market being a different location.
Do you understand that "issues can be raised" is necessarily a euphemism for "people can be threatened with fines, bankruptcy, or jail time"?
> Dynamic pricing isn't the issue here, the issue is that the extra profits generated by dynamic pricing are going to ticketmaster rather than to artists.

No.

This is just wrong. Pricing & fees are determined by the promoter and/or the artist. Ticketmaster takes a cut, but the tickets are owned by the promoter. The promoter has the final say in how revenue is shared with everyone -- including the artist & Ticketmaster.
The last time I bought concert tickets it was through Vivid Seats. The last NFL game I went to was through StubHub.

Its my understanding that some NFL actually has an official deal to sell through Ticketmaster first - though presumably any of these other companies could have that deal if they paid the NFL more.

FWIW I do think ticket convenience fees should be eliminated (or made so they have to be listed upfront) and this would be good for transparency - but I am also pretty sure that doing so would ultimately just raise listed prices.
Good luck inheriting Mark Anthony's mitochondrial DNA.
You wrote 0.005c not $0.005
SAE are normal, almost always not-related to the medicine used in trial. This is a disinfo piece.
I'd hope that an idle desktop redraws ~nothing and so doesn't waste any CPU cycles. And the GPU not being used might even save power. So as long as it's idle it would ideally consume less power, not more.
Your use of the term 'sad' seems to not match that of many of us.

I was not informed about its history, so I checked, and discovered that it means "satiated" - so the current use of 'sad' comes from the idea of the discomfort that being burdened by too much nourishment brings.

You must mean that the project is very "satiating". Good: surely it can fill us with a most fulfilling nourishment. But I would have used the most unambiguous term.
How about I should be able to do whatever I want with my content without some slimy lawyer or smarmy internet commenter giving me a hard time?
Yey, yet more vaccine misinformation. One kid having (not getting) diabetes proves nothing. SAEs are totally normal. One kid probably got a cold. Another had a birthday. That's why it's "buried" in an appendix. It's irrelevant.

Sub stack was the new Medium. Now it's the new fox news.
I took a week of vacation to work through Programming Rust uninterrupted. I have no immediate professional use for it, but it’s pretty clearly going to be important, and it has at least one new (to me) paradigm, so I wanted to fill that gap in knowledge. But I’m under no illusion that I “know Rust” after doing that! I just inched up to a more comfortable place on the learning curve.

BTW, I know there are plenty of people who wouldn’t consider that a vacation, and that’s fine, but they are different from me.
Be careful what number you call, because Grubhub puts their own number out there on Yelp pretending it's a direct line to the restaurant, when it actually goes through Grubhub's systems and they tack on a fee for your order. Google will sometimes give you the Yelp number as the restaurant's number if you just Google it, and they also create websites which scrape the original website and attempt to SEO their way above it so that they get their cut.

https://www.theverge.com/2019/8/6/20756878/yelp-grubhub-comm...
Only to the extent that MWI is actually a position. My understanding of MWI is: shit happens, and there's no need to understand why specific shit happens because all shit "happens" (by a definition of "happens" that carries basically no meaning) and you should be happy just to prove that the shit that happens is among the full set of shit that could happen. It's the "don't worry your pretty little head over it" theory of reality.

Here's the best poem ever written, or that will ever be written:

Roses are red
Violets are blue
MWI stinks
And so do you.

Don't think it's that great? Well, that's because there exist other versions of me that wrote different words up there, and you just happened to read a version that wasn't that great.

I hereby accept my position as God Poet of the Universe.
odd how merely the existence of a mechanism to try and attempt to prevent access falls under DRM, the the non-existence of such a mechanism apparently doesn't imply permission.
AWS doesn't want you to have that API! That's a significant part of their margin.
I've had a handful of arguments w/ smart people about Mary's room lately.

The conclusion I've come to is that the disagreement typically rests on how you define "knowledge." To many, "what the color blue looks like" does not constitute knowledge, because it doesn't enable you to make any additional quantitative statements beyond what you would know from an objective study of color/light. But in common usage, we say things like "I know what that feels like," meaning "I've felt that before." In the end, this is just a semantic disagreement.

But there are still philosophers like Dennett who take an even harder position, saying that functional knowledge is identical to experiential knowledge. I still can't quite wrap my head around this idea.
Hard to have any other take.
Having built models, I’d claim that it’s art based upon science, perhaps not too different than engineering a building. At every stage there are decisions to be made with tradeoffs. Over time, the resulting model could be invalidated or perhaps perform better. It’s remarkably difficult to approach or even define a “best” model.

What’s most peculiar to me is that somehow AI is becoming more distinct from math or stats and that there’s a notion by running pytorch one is able to play god and create sentience.
This is entirely unsurprising and has a very simple solution: keep adding more data. Our measurements of the accuracy of AI systems are only as good as the test data, and if the test data is too small, then the reported accuracies won't reflect the true accuracies of the model applied to wild data.

Basically, we need an accurate measure of whether the test data set is statistically representative of wild data. In healthcare, this means that the individuals that make of the test dataset must be statistically representative of the actual population (and also have enough samples).

An easy solution here is that any research that doesn't pass a population statistics test must be up-front declared to be "not representative of real word usage" or something.
> helping a portion of the population that is often underserved

somebody has a handicap, they are not underserved, that's a political euphemism, they underappreciate the standard servings.

I'm all for helping people, but it needs to be in light of a cost-benefit calculation, including who pays the cost and who-all receives benefits, public and private goods (closed captions do benefit more than the deaf)... I guess I'm saying, this needs to be done in the light of day and judiciously, with more balance than just private aggrievement. If this guy in Israel or Berkeley is sharing material that we-the-people benefit from and think needs to be accessible, this "wound" should be allowed to fester a bit while a reasonable cure is found, rather than shutting the whole things down.

Reminds me of a thought I often have when old laws apply to novel new situations and harsh judgements are passed down, I wish the judge could rule "hey, nobody thought of this before, so we're going to let this one go, but we're gonna rule the opposite way in the future so correct the law, and/or get your act together".
They don't want to prevent password sharing - they want to prevent account sharing. The reason they sell you four streams is so that everyone in your household can watch.
> That is interesting and I wonder how you prevent password sharing.

I think the Spotify example above is the correct model here: you'll never "prevent" password sharing so long as passwords are easily shared. (Even the idea of trying to use Google or Facebook accounts is just externalizing how easily the passwords are shared to a third party. There's still plenty of shared/group Google and Facebook accounts around.)

But what the Spotify example (among others now too) show is that you can incentivize people to use their own individual accounts by making it easier to accounts to band together in billing cycles as a group (or family) and making that bundling convenient and cheap enough that they prefer it to account sharing. (Plenty of people still share Spotify accounts, but it is certainly far fewer than if they didn't have such a strong family plan option that encourages people to use individual accounts.)
Interesting. But notice how they aren't interrupting the other speaker with their own point. Because that is nearly universally poor manners.
All of which is preferable to an ever-growing spec whose pace makes it impossible for a newcomer to enter the browser space.
They certainly don't lower costs for the consumer. Nail them.
> Couldn't this guy just hire a professional captioning service or offer transcripts to users that may need it

"Can't this guy doing something for free do even more work, under threat of prosecution, for the putative but questionable benefit of a small minority?"
Nonsense, list a house 2x market value and it wont go pending immediately. List it at 1/2X and it will.

It makes perfect sense in a sellers market from a an agents perspective. Agents maximize number of deals, making hay while the sun shines.

Sellers maximize competition, and get to do so because it is/was a sellers market.

Of course low rates are why it was a sellers market, but this is the winning strategy in a that market.
> people are expected to take decades longer to pay off a house than it would take for them to build it alone with their own hands in their spare time. Somehow every non-homeowner has to be a policy slave to the passive income of some wealthy person.

I agree that we have made houses too central to net-worth, but most homeowners are not wealthy. They are typically paying a significant amount of "rent" in the form of interest on the borrowed capital used to purchase their houses. I'm not saying it's the same as the non-tax-deductible rent paid by renters, but it's a very different situation than an inherited house in a very expensive area that is owned outright.

> people are expected to take decades longer to pay off a house than it would take for them to build it alone with their own hands in their spare time.

As someone who built significant portions of my house with my own hands in my spare time, I can assure you that individuals artisanally and incrementally building their homes is not a scalable approach to housing. We should instead be building houses like we build modular flat-pack furniture, with major components built in controlled factory settings, and final assembly on site. The way I did it (GC doing the heavy structural work, my doing the finishing work) itself isn't scalable.

Yes it saved me money, but the amount of knowledge I had to build in order to effectively complete it isn't realistic for most people, who very reasonably aren't interested in the understanding all the different ways to do flooring underlayments.
I would love if you also added Vlang and shared your experience especially since you're already familiar with Go.
My home door is the garage door, so I'm already in my car "door to door". The distance is <3mi. Assuming an average speed of 32mph (almost 1/3 of that <3mi is at 55mph, most is 40mph, I get that average speed often according to my car's computer) that's 0.5333 miles/minute. So that's then 5.625 minutes.

Sorry, I guess I was wrong, its 5 minutes and 38 seconds.
If you control both the server and the client, you can make yourself your own private CA, issue all the certs you need, and have no browser errors anywhere.
This of it like this: scalpers are currently taking money away from artists.
Banning ticket resale would prevent scalpers from profiting, but does nothing to help the artists capture the money they've been missing all along.

You may or may not consider that to be a problem.
I loved "Go Hang A Salami, I'm a Lasagna Hog" as a kid, learned lots of good ones from there.

Another all time great, when it comes to media based around palindromes, is Weird Al's Bob Dylan style parody, palindromically titled: Bob.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUQDzj6R3p4
Yeah, it's great. School districts need excuses to have a day off here and there.

My local district has a half dozen or so early release days and full days off for teacher training or whatever. They really ought to tie it to some event on the calendar that gives them an opportunity to teach a little bit about whatever that event is.

PS - I'm still waiting for Chicago Public Schools to reinstate Pulaski Day, even though I don't live there anymore. It's such a random holiday to observe and have a parade, etc.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_Pulaski_Day
A proceess that avoids the profiteering is maybe...
- complainant makes complaint to government agency
- Agency investigates and makes demands for changes
- Fines levied by agency on failure to address shortcomings

Private suits like we see here (and other ADA-type regulations), where lawyers serve to profit directly, are the problem. Not accessibility regulations in general.