skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Not the parent, but I 'd say this amounts to how you define a "universe". There is a single wavefunction which says that one "copy" of you observes result A and another "copy" observes result B. Using the phrase "many universes" implies that these two scenarios are considered as "different universes". I personally do not like this phrase and find it misleading.
>> Otherwise it's some opportunity cost (arguably) but you can continue paying your mortgage payments to stay in your house, and if you hold long enough it'll likely recover.

Most people cannot do this though, because the conditions that lead to housing market crashes also result in huge numbers of layoffs. What that means is that not only do people find themselves "underwater" but also unemployed, which means they either can no longer afford their mortgage payments, or sell at a (often huge) loss and start renting and/or relocate.
Lawsuits are terrifying for an average person. They are also expensive.
Page media has been supported for decades. Line numbers aren’t strictly related to page media. It’s hard to complain about the lack of in-depth support for a media that isn’t meant to display “the web”.

I do agree that it could be better. They have been adding print-related features though, at least I remember some in CSS3. CSS Colors Level 4 includes cmyk functions.
I wrote pyinfra so am biased but we used it at my previous company on a fleet of roughly 1.5k physical boxes (including deploys spanning all of them at once) extensively, so it scales to that level well. We had probably 30 groups within that each with their own deployments as well and all tied together using a single Jenkins box.

I would love to test beyond that but haven’t had the opportunity sadly! Performance and scale is a headline feature so will always look to push this further.
Measuring CPU usage of eBPF programs in Kubernetes clusters
That would be why I said "new", yes.

Given that we can get satellites to GEO, we can presumably get one that goes boom up there, should we be so inclined.
The Intel 8087 and iAPX432 could store 2 bits per transistor in ROM

https://twitter.com/kenshirriff/status/1046436838146113536
There's a famous skateboard video part by Mark Suciu, Verso, which has been covered ad nauseum in skate circles.

The video ends in a groundbreaking way with somewhat of a palindrome: a series of tricks, with each trick mirroring the one before it. He's gone on record stating it took about 2000 attempts, more than two years, and resulted in numerous injuries.

The final (and first!) trick of the sequence is among the simplest in skateboarding: a 50-50 grind.

Final tricks in video parts-- "enders" in the lingua franca-- are traditionally reserved for extremely technical or groundbreaking tricks on unique or challenging obstacles. Enders are of high cultural significance, often analyzed and talked about for decades. A skater can quite literally make a career out of a good ender.

In Verso, one of the most hyped videos of year, Suciu capped his run with a simple trick on an unassuming curb, and the skate community at large panned the part.

That was until someone discovered (Or Mark had to explain) the mirrored sequence, and people began to dissect the part and reveal the brilliant nature of the performance.

I'd struggle to articulate exactly how challenging the sequence was, and there are breakdown videos on youtube and comments littering the net who do it better anyhow.
interesting! can you share some details?
Preach.

There are way too many people that conflate MSE or other abstract technical measurements of model performance like they actually represent the impact any model has on a problem. Even if we could somehow perfectly predict an actual realization instead of a conditional expectation that still forgets to ask the question of why we predicted that. Are we exploiting systemic biases, like historically racist policies? Almost definitely (unless we've consciously tried to adjust for them, and still we've probably done that incorrectly). I've become much less interested in models that basically just interpolate (very well I might add), and more in frameworks that attempt to answer why we see particular patterns.
We used SuperMicro servers and their TCO increased substantially after an average of 36 months. Keep in mind there are environmental issues such as CRAC failures, power stability, back EMF, etc which all harm components. It's very difficult to quantify the server lifetime, you need to be conservative in financial planning and that ended up with a median lifetime of 36MO.

You can get deeper into the weeds and look at Zinc Whiskers and such but that's a niche you just have to generalize.
Sure, but some people pay $30,000 for a bottle of Chateau Petrus too. Personally, I think they're crazy.

But it's not the existence of the high end that I'm remarking on, it's the apparent lack of low-end competition. Where is the two-buck chuck of vertical flute adapters?
I can't speak for grandparent commenter. However, I can point out that the standard library for Java 17 has a TOTAL of 4,388 classes. TODAY. A quarter-century after the timeframe that they're talking about:

https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/17/docs/api/allclasse...

So if ~10k classes were really written in a year, then I can only assume that most of that was the compiler or virtual machine runtime (i.e. C++ code) rather than the standard library Java code.

Regardless of how anyone feels about "verbosity" or "design patterns" in Java application code, the underlying JDK is pretty inarguably one of the most solid and impressive pieces of tech ever developed. I'm not throwing any rocks at that codebase.
I think it's possible that Elon himself is perceived as a security issue. A man like thay having the world's biggest megaphone may be a concern to government prognosticators, who knows.
I think you misunderstand. OP was commenting on how new builds plummeted after the 08 recession, meaning we don't have enough supply now.
That sometimes sounds like a good idea.
Because it's significantly more work than you'd expect to rent out a place and manage it.

Some people get lucky with golden tenants who never cause trouble, pay on time, and even fix little things on their own.

Others get unlucky and have to deal with a neverending stream of issues, from dealing with payment issues to having to leave work in the middle of the day to handle the issue of the week.

The laws around being a landlord are also more complex than you'd expect. In many locations, you can't show up and fix things on a rental by yourself unless you're a licensed contractor. A lot of landlords ignore that and do it anyway, but if anything goes wrong then you have a target on your back as soon as the tenant engages with a lawyer. Hiring a property management company is a way to pay someone else to handle all of that and take a significant legal liability off of your shoulders.

I remember early in my career I worked with a guy who thought he was going to manage a couple rentals on the side while doing his SWE job. He ended up getting PIPed because he was missing so many meetings and had to disappear all the time to deal with the latest issues at one of his locations, or even just to try to find new tenants after the constant turnover.
The encapsulation isn't complete because of SNI.
> We could test this by trying to actually do it, by putting really large and complex systems in superposition.

Is there any hope that one could actually do this? The article mentions that large systems may be self-observing (via gravity).
Very cool! It's funny, over the years I've seen high-tech digital Roland accordions used in very trad venues where I wouldn't expect them.

But TBH when I saw the thread I was expecting something a little more like Keith Cary's Commodium (a mandolin made from a metal bedpan)...

https://www.fretboardjournal.com/features/odd-jobs-the-fanta...
> Do you agree or disagree that Mary constructing a red LED to experience redness is not a legitimate response to the Knowledge Argument?

It depends on what you think the Knowledge Argument is supposed to prove.

If you think the Knowledge Argument is supposed to prove that physicalism is false, then I disagree. To refute physicalism, it is pointless to say that some physical processes are not "knowledge". Even if the physicalist agrees, that in no way refutes physicalism. The physicalist simply says that the processes that Mary induces in her brain by constructing a red LED (or doing surgery on her optic nerve, or just imagining what seeing red would be like), even if they are not "knowledge", are still physical processes, and that those physical processes are Mary's experience of seeing red. Nothing in the Knowledge Argument refutes that.

If you think the Knowledge Argument is supposed to prove that there are physical things that aren't "knowledge" (whether or not there are also non physical things is then a separate question), then I neither agree nor disagree as a matter of physics, since what we use the word "knowledge" to refer to is a matter of definitions of words, not physics. I have no problem with accepting your definition of the word "knowledge" for purposes of this discussion. I just don't think accepting that definition says anything about whether or not physicalism is true.
Nobody said trusting minorities was a requirement of a high-trust society but I believe you've completely underlined my point, unintentionally. Immigrants aren't "outsiders" for example. And women and single men, atheists and others I mentioned have nothing to do with race or ethnicity.
On the top of the concept, not curl itself.

If curl can run locally, so should all of these tools.
Cops have the unfortunate position of having to police where the crime is. We have the means to just place a button on a screen. The hackers trying to get in and steal is of no consequence to a programmer.

If in some wierdo universe where programmers had to stop hackers by busting down their door in the middle of the night to stop a hack, maybe programmers would be facing the same scrutiny.

Public: You're going after too many minorities!!!

You: I'm just trying to stop the hackers!!!!

Public: Defund the programmers!

You: Look we stopped 40 white hackers last month! We'll stop going after the others, we promise.

(then you just stop doing anything)
With grid: https://jsfiddle.net/1oghfL9s/
If you want CSS to be the same across browsers then help implement CSS tests and file bugs

https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/Overview.en.html

https://web-platform-tests.org/

better specs are great, but tests will actually find the edge cases and lead to more convergence.
Show HN: An informal comparison of several programming languages
Software rendering simply stinks, doubly so if you're running a fancy composited desktop. Regardless of CPU speed or UI fluidity, your CPU and GPU processes are now fighting for the same cycles, bottlenecking one another in the worst way possible.

The M1 has a fairly good GPU, so there's hope that the battery life and overall experience will improve in the future. As of now though, I'd reckon there's dozens of x86 Linux laptops that can outlast the M1 on Linux. Pitting a recent Ryzen laptop versus an Asahi Macbook isn't even a fair fight.
Maybe the Economist should try staying in their lane? From some of their recent articles I'd say they struggle enough with finance and the economy.
His videos aren't subtitled, and are required to include subtitles.
I don't understand how high prices good news for anyone except people who own multiple houses. Your home is not a luxury. If you're selling it in an inflated market you're also buying in an inflated market, unless you want to throw your money away renting.
POOP is the world's shittiest palindrome.
There was at least one mentioned:

"Given the Israeli accessibility law, the use of the courses on this new website will be limited (up to 500 students). According to the Israeli accessibility law, unless this requirement is met, there will be a need to add subtitles to all video clips in all of the courses that the website includes."
The point of the prosecution was to be a warning to others that might have been thinking about not appearing. Bannon offered to appear once it became obvious that he would be convicted but the committee refused that offer. They obviously had decided that value of the conviction was greater than any value of him testifying at that point. Once convicted any leverage to compel him appear was lost.
> I have to type the magic key sequence to bypass the error.

8 keys? f + i + r + e + f + o + x + Enter?
Random semi related question about chip making: AFAIK CPU's have multiple layers, not just a single silicon layer of transistors. And also, making transistors involves doping the silicon with other elements. And lithography is about shining a laser through a mask. And all this starting from an already cut silicon wafer.

So how are the multiple layers done, if light is shined on the surface, how do you reach the other layers? And how is this doping done, you also need to choose what element goes where but this couldn't be done with light and a mask I'd think (so even if single layer I wonder how this works)? And how do you reach the other layers with those chemical elements for doping?
That’s just hidden variable theory. The answer for MWI is “all of them”.
The last line mentioned having to caption videos, so I believe this is the accessibility issue.
"Thanks to [a lack of subtitles on all of my videos], I [choose] to delete my websites" rather than add subtitles.
Many states have property tax solutions for the elderly or otherwise unable to pay, and even the ones that don't often have payment options available.

Here's one random one: https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/misc/lfb/informational_pape...

And many jurisdictions it doesn't matter what your house appraises at, because when yours goes up everyone else's goes up, and they allocate the property tax based on the needs (budget) of the community. So if your house was 1% of the total value in the town, it will remain 1% even if it tripled in price.
One one side you said

changing societal norms

but at the same time you said

one cannot change about themselves.

Strong contradiction. How does society change if people don't? Get them while they are young?
>the underlying JDK is pretty inarguably one of the most solid and impressive pieces of tech ever developed.

I agree, JVM is impressive.
No experiments with bat Coronaviruses happened "1 km" from the epicenter. WIV is 15km away.. so even if you were to believe it originated at the WIV, it's still odd why it took off at a seafood market 15km away instead of at the very busy campus or any market much closer to their research center.
Steam as a Snap
Perhaps also single family zoning started to make its effects clear in the 80's.

Personally I'd prefer to live in a nice townhouse in a dense neighborhood but that's hard to pull off (location wise not many options, and price wise there's just not enough available to make the nice ones comparable to a single family house)
It's a decade old, and the things that Titus and Hyrum work on aren't Google specific but "improving c++ apis". It's just that Google has

1. A lot of code
2. The ability to test all of their dependencies code

And so the people making the changes can detect all of the breakages. If it was possible for me to run the CI for every system on GitHub that depended on the library, it might be more obvious, but usually the cost of these unintentional breakages is borne by users not maintainers.

The law applies to anyone who maintains a widely used library, whether that's good, Django, or std::.

And note that many more people in this thread are calling the law "obvious", than thinking it's not true. That should give you some pause.
Apple designed a new bootloader that enforces security settings per partition and not per machine, so not only can you run a third party OS, doing so does not degrade the security when you boot the Mac partition.
This is a problem with accessibility laws in general, not with Israel in particular. Remember when UC Berkeley was a victim of the same kind of attack? https://reason.com/2017/03/07/berkeley-deletes-200000-free-o...
Frankly, it's because whatever the theoretical definitions, the actual right wing, at least in America and the UK, has come to stand for short-term profit for the very wealthy over all other considerations (except, perhaps, white supremacy and maintaining the power of right-wing politicians).

But aside from the very small number actively benefiting from this shift, too few people are willing to admit—or even understand—that it has taken place. They're just too invested in the Red vs Blue football game to be willing to do anything but blindly support "Their Side".
> And the hilarious part is that most commenters here are commenting on an article talking about how terrible the CIA is and somehow throwing all that out the window when it comes to Ukraine.

This you?

>>> Not that different than what the US is doing in Ukraine right now.

Ukraine has nothing to do with the CIA, but you brought it up, so here we are. We're not throwing anything out.
I'm aware of ternary computers.

What I was trying to say is that there are things we don't do because they're hard or we don't know how, and there are things that we don't do because we've proven they don't work.

Ternary does have some cool features though.
Upload the videos to a private YouTube channel and then download the autogenerated subtitles?
The reason is they want to bundle stream quality to stream quantity to keep squeezing subscription money for features you don't use. I share my account because 4k streaming is locked behind their Premium tier, 4 simultaneous stream account. I pay double the price in order to get 4k streaming. If they don't want me to share my account, I'd be happy with a 4k quality, 1 stream quantity account, at a lower price. They don't want to do that. When they keep the pricing the same and now try to charge me for account sharing, I'll just cancel.

https://help.netflix.com/en/node/24926
> I feel like

There's your problem. You're feeling more than realizing. Twitter's most complex problems aren't infrastruture; it's adhering to various national laws on language while trying to keep hate speech off as well (they are doing a terrible job at this of course). But saying that they should just allow "free speech" is an extreme oversimplification and lacks an understanding of jurisdictions outside the US.
> Allowing those with financial privilege access at the expense of those without us fundamentally antithetical to music and art.

No, it's really not. There have never been many peasants going to the opera houses of the world. And it's not at the expense of the poor, it's quite literally at their own expense.

All that is happening here is that technology has allowed the market to directly determine prices, rather than artists and venues guessing at what the market will bare. It only means poor people will be priced out so long as artists as a group don't react to the increased demand. Likely "elite" performers will be able to always demand these premium prices but a lesser tier, and those past their prime, will perform at prices poorer consumers will be able to afford.

What we see now is the result of extremely high demand (there are a lot more people in the US than there used to be) meeting limited supply, and new technology allowing for more market efficiency. The poor people who used to be able to get lucky and buy tickets well under market value are certainly going to be less happy, but that has nothing to do with some moral requirement for music.
In my mind, what you did was actually the goal of the paper. You researched the prevailing theories of the "impact of Teutoburg Forest on Roman politics" and summarized them in your own words. You probably have a much better understanding of the subject than if an AI did it for you though.
Sounds like the videos need closed captions. Not a particularly difficult task to add them. It can be frustrating to go back and do this with older content, but captions make the videos accessible to a lot more people. Automated captioning software is also very high quality these days. There’s really no reason not to do it these days.
Not much of a description of the new accessibility requirements, so I don't think people can have much insight about what exactly broke down here. I'm guessing if a website has more than 500 viewers/visitors a month, it's required that the videos must be captioned? Couldn't this guy just hire a professional captioning service or offer transcripts to users that may need it? This all seems a bit dramatic from the guy, but I've never heard of this accessibility law nor am I familiar with how Israel enforces such things, so some more context would be appreciated.
Why should you be offended that learning materials are improving, toolchains are getting easier, and net access is available to all now?

It's like complaining that automatics exist. You can still drive manual! You have that on people! But fundamentally it is a simpler field than it was then, due to the gigabytes of abstraction for every little thing you can do with a computer now.

That points toward an attribution error or a fundamental insecurity.
"Many black and white books and TV programmes have taught her all there is to know about colour vision. Mary knows facts like the structure of our eyes and the exact wavelengths of light that stimulate our retinas when we look at a light blue sky."

This is a serious hole in the argument. "All there is to know about color vision" is an abstraction---it's "about" color vision; it's not vision. The experience of color vision is a different set of data than wavelengths and eye structure.
...Or maybe Elixir programmers don't want to work at companies that enable crypto scams that have no provable usecase and lose people's savings.

This tells me if you want to kill a crypto company quickly, outright refuse to work at one or switch jobs immediately.

The quicker programmers jump ship from crypto companies the better for humanity.
> only rich people can experience these events, isn’t it?

This is how it already is. There is a ton of stuff that only rich people can afford to experience. Luxuries cost money. Seeing the Rolling Stones live in concert is a luxury.

> what is so special about these events anyway?

I'm with you here. I'd take watching a big concert or sporting event from home over live in person any day. I honestly think the majority of people that attend these big events mainly do it so they can tell people they did. Same reason people go to Times Square on NYE.
The lending bank finances the mortgage on the financial markets, the spread between their interest rate and the one the bank clients get is the banks profit. Part of the terms and conditions are that those profits for the bank are what you, as the oerson taking the mortgage, owns the bank for the duration of the interest rate fix. That is capped so, by law, at 10 years. Partial down payments are negotiable, e.g. 10% of the initial loan per year. Anything above that, and prior to that 10 years, will incure the clients obligation to cover the banks lost profits (part of what you agreed to pay the bank). If the explanation makes sense.
Why would Bezos invest in hedge funds?

He's so wealthy he could lose 99.99% of his net worth and still live a life of complete luxury, safety and comfort.
It directly competes for some use cases, for time, and for ads. One person's total time spent watching videos doesn't grow just because there's a new platform on the block. Kids even use TikTok as an alternative to Google searches for knowledge. I'm not saying TikTok alone can wreck Google, but YouTube at least felt threatened enough to make something similar called Shorts.

IDK about the social network side. Google doesn't really have one, so it's whatever.
My phone can autocaption audio from any website, I assume there are services that would do this for videos. Is this worth considering?
does not expand the table if the content doesnt fit

https://i.imgur.com/K1gOKGL.png