skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Commerce clause has been abused to hell and back.

Peoples heads will fall off if the Supreme Court starts undoing all its prior decisions that rely on it.
I think this a pretty excessive hike, and told them as such. I readily admit that I consume a lot of Youtube - it's replaced a lot of my other content (cable, etc) and I'm willing to pay for it. But this is a pretty big step. It'll be over $300 USD/ year, in fact.

When they biffed the Google Play Music -> YT Music transition, I tried to cancel but the ads - oh, god, the ads. They were TERRIBLE and I've only heard they've gotten worse.

Ugh. I really like compensating content creators more than they get from ad rolls, but this has me real torn. There are, of course, ways to pay less via other countries portals, but I expect those loopholes to be closed shortly. I primarily consume on iOS mobile devices, so ad-blocking is tough (though Vanced is A+ if you're an Android user).
I didn’t know this.
Between 25k and 35k... this seems more like half the price the model 3 is right now... after they doubled it during the pandemic.
How can you prove that natural origin is the hypothesis selected by the razor in this particular case?
FWIW, Void is like a bigger version of Alpine; they even both have musl versions. (Interestingly, I've always found Debian quite reliable but agree that it definitely lacks the polish that Ubuntu provides.)
My point is that no ISV ever bootstrapped or got VC-funded in the 1995-2007 period by making a bet on selling "apps" for the PDA software market; the revenue would be too low to keep the company going, and the TAM would be too low for even longer-term-minded VCs to be interested.

What probably did happen, a bit, was that ISVs that made software for other markets, may have ported their software to PDAs, and sold that. (E.g. "WinZip for Windows CE", things like that.) But that doesn't mean that these companies were surviving off of this. These were effectively "halo products" (products that don't sell many units, which are made instead to increase the brand perception of key influencers who happen to have such niche interests, and thus influence their [influential] opinion of the rest of the product range through the halo effect.)
https://archive.ph/HvaqT
A lot of this rings very true but I think it's missing the actual nobel intent of DevOps that is still true even if it's been hopelessly corrupted. He touches on a lot of the counter examples that lead to the rise of DevOps. Things like ops/admin teams making themselves a gatekeeper or bottleneck to delivery. That's a classic problem in traditional IT departments. Dev is incentived to ship features, Ops are incentived to avoid downtime. The two goals conflict. DevOps says we all work together to ship features that don't cause downtime. That's a philosophical aim and not a new discipline. The maturity and sophistication of the tools and practitioners is orthogonal. If you hire a team and set them apart from Dev and give them an incentive to avoid downtime and call them DevOps then you've accomplished nothing. If you hire SREs or platform engineers or whatever else you call them and align their incentives to dev and dev to them then congratulations.
Sorry, but if you do not believe getting security warnings, having to go into the settings and mangle with configuration, just to be able to install a store downloaded from a website, sometimes go through additional configuration depending on your phone's modifications (looking at you Xiaomi) to then install the actual program you wanted is not "discouraged by the system UX", despite the real world experiences of companies who have tried even simpler things and failed, I'm not sure we can agree on what's viable or not.
Its objective is not to introduce friction, it's to outlaw spyware

Then why not just outlaw the spyware? Why go through the theater of "you can use spyware, but you have to get the user to 'agree' to it first, and you're not allowed to offer them anything in exchange"? That's just asking for the dark patterns and malicious compliance/non-compliance that we've gotten.
Voter turnout where? In the US it's been on a long term upward trend, although it arguably trails rather than leads events. This upcoming midterm election is expected to set a record, possibly matching turnout for presidential election years if current trends hold.
For free users, it's pretty much just G, MS, and GH (which is currently the only "tolerable" one, but there's no reason why it won't turn into a MS account in the future just like how they killed Minecraft)
> My Occam's razor says that every other virus has a natural origin, why wouldnt this one too?

That's simply not true. There's an entire branch of virology dedicated to synthetic viruses; the first was made over 20 years ago.
Linkedin will never require proof of income. That's much more intrusive. So no it's not an optimization over something that simply never will occur.

I think you may just have to accept that if you want to verify an employee, you'll need to call their previous employers. This is the way it's always been done.
I suspected this since Day 1 and never downloaded the app. Don't have a problem with Chinese people, just the government. China is known for its callous authoritarian state that openly express their goal of surpassing America. By law, Chinese companies have to comply with authoritarian demands from their government (iirc there is even a CCP member assigned to each company) and at any time can turn into an pseudo arm of the state. On top of that, China has had numerous scandals where they send Chinese spies to various institutions like universities and companies and steal research and trade secrets. I also distanced myself from most social media in general as American companies are still horrible when it comes to privacy. Surprised by the amount of people that hate China spying on Americans via TikTok but say nothing about our tech companies. Big Tech hands out our data to our government so they can circumvent the fourth amendment as well as other nefarious acts.
Two blocks is nothing... until you have a car that's fully-laden with heavy/bulky cargo.
If we're going to say that this is a thing that happens then I'd want to see some statistics, probably segmented by year / cultures.

My wife got stitched up after childbirth too tightly due to an inexperienced FEMALE doctor. We were both conscious, both present, my wife was lucid (and exhausted).

Now all sex is painful and there hasn't been actual penetration for 7 months since the little one was born.

No one from our caucasian circles have even heard about it.

> "The fact that there is even a practice called the husband stitch is a perfect example of the intersection of the objectification of women’s bodies and healthcare"

There is no practise. The term was made up by a woman in the original "exposé".

Is there crooked doctors and dumb husbands? Sure. But it's not some world wide conspiracy against women.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagan_standard

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. This is why people are skeptical.
They claim to have not sent a takedown. https://i.imgur.com/ayMxTYp.png
Maybe that post has been edited into coherence, but when it was posted that summary was misleading or flat wrong about a lot of points.
A Bluetooth Low Energy  soil moisture sensor
I just spent a few days in Birmingham, Alabama. The downtown streets were so clean you could eat off of them.

It is really hard to come back to Seattle and see all of the trash everywhere. In the Seattle airport one of the bathroom stalls looked like someone had used the floor as a trash can. There were orange peels, discarded shoes, and various other trash sitting on the floor next to the toilet.

Social problems exist everywhere, but that's no reason to give up on having pleasant and usable public spaces.
I have the opposite Occam's razor thoughts. My opinion is we are not capable of developing in a lab a virus that is so transmissible and survivable in human species only. I think the complexity of the virus machinery and its interactions inside of our bodies and immune system is beyond astronomical in complexity. It's laughable to suggest that we are so intelligent as to invent a better version of the machinery that is hypothesized as the very machinery responsible for creation of multi cellular life itself.
It sounds like you're not talking about superblocks, you're just talking about the existing blocks of Eixample.

The superblocks concept is that they'd be grouped together into 3x3 grids, by changing traffic rules and building urban furniture to block off streets, creating new squares and one-way systems. The goal being that everything would be far more walkable and you'd see far more local community - i.e. less of the cookie cutter shops you describe.
I liked Manjaro and Artix, but eventually the package databases somehow got confused and I couldn't upgrade them anymore without deleting files. However, Manjaro especially looks fantastic, and Artix doesn't come with systemd, which is a win..
At least in Barcelona, the blocks are already there and have been since the end of the 19th century - they are just grouping the blocks into superblocks where through traffic is only allowed on (on average) every third street and the rest are car free (I imagine residents can still use them).
As I understand it, the cathode is where electrons "leave", the anode is where they "enter". In case of a battery, electrons leave the minus side. But for a device being powered, electrons enter the minus side.
Even with all that baggage Uber was still 100x more ethical than all the mafia-run taxi cartels they destroyed.
As an employee of an open source foundation of seven people, who sees hundreds of employees of said project, I guess I salute this move.
OK, so let's say you strongly believe in the mission of CampaignForFooBarForAll. You've raised money for them, you've been on the marches, you've done the phone tree. But you want to do more.

Someone suggests you head to DC, and start talking to congresscritters (or their aides) about the message of CampaignForFooBarForAll.

You'd love to do this. But you need to pay the rent, and for food, and other regular expenses. Someone in the campaign suggests that they could pay for you to do this for 1 month a year.

Shall we send you to jail?

Let's suppose that you say "yes".

Now consider Jan Lobbier, who works for BigMega Corp. Jan is employed there full time, with various duties. Among them are trips and calls to DC to put the company's position in front of The People Who Matter. This is not Jan's only job, just a part of their job duties. Should Jan go to jail?

What you're suggesting would mean that lobbying could only be done by the financially independent (i.e. can lobby because they don't need to work), and that seems like a bad idea for everyone.
I don't know how it is in all cases, but at least when using java back in the day, the source of a binary was trivial to look at?

And now many apps are written in js
Kind of okay with this if content creators really get 55%.
Supertag is a tag-based file system, written in Rust
I had no idea OpenRTC2 was written in JavaScript https://github.com/Limetric/OpenRCT2.org
Please note: I am not a lawyer

With that said, pretty much everyone in my family, including my SO, are lawyers and I have been around the block a few times when it comes to discussing slander / libel suits in the US.

As an independent 3rd party with no interest in the world of Chess, I don't see how Niemann expects to win any damages in this case.

In the US the bar for slander is very high due to the existence of the first amendment and trying to protect it, you will basically have to prove malicious intent and that the offending party knew they were lying. Other countries like the UK have a much lower bar which is why it's a bigger deal there.

Unless I am missing some clear piece of evidence no one made a bad faith comment (and i need to stress you need to prove this beyond a reasonable doubt)

Magnus felt there was foul play because he knew of Nieman's history of cheating which was public knowledge in the chess world, same thing with his comments regarding the coach

Chess.com simply made available data that is rightfully theirs and stated that his rise has been exceptional.

Hikaru simply commented on the situation like a million other youtubers / twitch streamers and influencers, he just happens to be an expert in the field so he made his opinion using his domain knowledge and the fact that Niemann had been previously accused of cheating.

Again, unless i am missing some clear piece of evidence no one acted maliciously or twisted the truth to purposely cause harm, only gave their opinion using the information they had available.
The point of Occam's Razor is you can't prove the things the Razor leans you to. Not in a way sufficient to remove the need to invoke the Razor. But you can say that one explanation is simpler than another (such as a pandemic virus being more closely patterned to every other pandemic in human history than to a novel mechanism that has never become a pandemic before).

I see a bright glow on the eastern horizon about 7AM and it's probably the sun coming up. It could be the first strike in a world-ending nuclear exchange. I can't prove it isn't.

... but it's probably not.
Conservatives and Libertarian circles consistently make fun of Nancy Pelosi's blatant insider trading so I wouldn't be so sure. It's basically a meme.

That said, additional legislation is unlikely to fix the issue, I'm sure Nancy will find another way to bypass any kind of checks coming their way (eg. setting up a company wherever in the world and trading through that).

No, legislating this kind of things can just create additional work for the accountants of the powerful but it will never fix the problem.

The only real change can come from removing power from a few hands and decentralise, giving it back to the people.
Can you help me understand why it's of poor taste? I am fully claiming that terrible things happened to the First Nations of the Americas... (ie not denying).
China and USA Are Officially at Economic War
Folks abuse drugs right on the street in SF. I don’t see why they’d prefer to take up a stall, where you’re much more likely to get noticed, complained about, and “handled”.

If not a doggy bag supply outside locked bathrooms, a roomful of toilets with no doors/walls/etc would be better than what we have now. Down with the idea that defecation is a naughtily private affair, bring back public bathhouses!
It's the user's choice how to install Firefox for sure. The opa works fine on ubuntu
> My opinion is we are not capable of developing in a lab a virus that is so transmissible and survivable in human species only. I think the complexity of the virus machinery and its interactions inside of our bodies and immune system is beyond astronomical in complexity. It's laughable to suggest that we are so intelligent as to invent a better version of the machinery that is hypothesized as the very machinery responsible for creation of multi cellular life itself.

The very first synthetic virus created in 2002 and was modeled after polio, which is fairly transmissible and affects humans. That virus was made 20 years ago; synthetic biology has come a very long way since then.

Does that fact alter your opinion?
Great attempts are made to prevent lab leaks, so a failure of procedure can't be considered extraordinary.
Tell HN: Don't be Datadog, don't send 'hope you don't mind me reaching out' spam
Honestly, if you have to start your email 'I hope you don't mind me reaching out', just stop writing and don't send it.

(I mean, maybe if you have something to offer me, other than.. the chance to give you money.)
"The Lie Behind the Lie Detector" had a big impact on me [1]. As a
kid I made lie detectors (a 9 volt battery, 1M-Ohm resistor, BC108
transistor and buzzer) and got sent home from school for
"Interrogating" the other kids. The teacher evidently thought it
really worked - even though as an 8 year old I knew it was just an
electronic trick.

40 years later the Iraqi government was purchasing thousands of ADE
651 "bomb detectors" [2] - basically a stick - that no doubt caused
some poor dudes to get blown to bits by IEDs.

All technology (indistinguishable from magic) has a cult-like aura
around it, in that there's the reality of what it does, and a separate
set of human beliefs about what it does. Cybersecurity is full of
wishful and magical thinking in this regard. I sometimes feel like a
kind of James Randi, trying to debunk the certainty people want and
project on to technologies.

[1] https://antipolygraph.org/lie-behind-the-lie-detector.pdf

[2] https://www.cnet.com/culture/divining-rod-reborn-as-explosiv...
M'y physics prof loved his NeXT machine back in the day.
https://archive.ph/6mJXa
> For example, when Google reimplemented Java for Android, they didn't copy the OpenJDK code. They just wrote their own code that fulfilled what the methods did. If they'd taken the OpenJDK code and just renamed a variable or two in each method, I think Oracle would have had a very strong case.

One of the things I remember reading about that trial was that one of the Oracle lawyers was adamant that a method called "rangeCheck" had been copied and that it was proof that Google was able to get Android out into the market faster than if they hadn't copied code. The method was used inside the standard library (but not exported as part of the API) to check if the index of an array was out of bounds and throw the proper exception (so basically, if index < 0 throw one thing, if index >= length throw a different one, otherwise do nothing). The judge who heard the original case (and the second one at that level after the appeals court sent it back down to judge whether it was fair-use) had programmed in other languages in the past and decided to learn Java before the trial, so he was able to tell that this was such a trivial bit of code that it wasn't at all surprising that the code was the same and that even if it were copied, it would not expedite Android's appearance in the market in any noticeable way, leading to this amazing quote:

"I have done, and still do, a significant amount of programming in other languages. I've written blocks of code like rangeCheck a hundred times before. I could do it, you could do it. The idea that someone would copy that when they could do it themselves just as fast, it was an accident. There's no way you could say that was speeding them along to the marketplace. You're one of the best lawyers in America --how could you even make that kind of argument?"

Obviously most judges won't have this level of technical experience (I remember reading about a different case where a judge upheld an objection to the prosecution zooming into a photo on an iPad due to worrying that it might manipulate the image inaccurately, but then didn't have a problem with them wheeling in a giant TV instead of displaying the imaged scaled up on that), but I think the law has a capacity for nuance about these sort of technical issues that might surprise some programmers, especially with regards to the fact that intent and context can sometimes matter as much or even more than the end of result of something.
Id3fsd – FUSE filesystem for browsing id3 tags
The way they have been working on this has been interesting. Rather than a from scratch approach, they started with the original game and over time replaced component by component the original game bits with open source replacements.
I wasn't asking for a proof of the phenomenon, but a proof that the razor points to that phenomenon.
Why is Dec 30, 1899 the Microsoft zero date?
Actually brings up a good question of why can't dpkg/.deb just support having multiple library versions? My understanding is that it is not support, but if it was, then couldn't that obviate the need for snap?
Of course, never let a good crisis go to waste
The strict keyword per that doc already taints the a table for pre 3.37.0 (2021-11-27) libraries. (There is a way around that for pre 3.37 per the doc, but it's mainly enabling the PRAGMA used for db recovery operations that treats the strict at the end as an error and ignores it to "facilitate recovery").

So the solution your after would be some additional calls when initializing the database to enable the FK checks (alongside any other app related PRAGMA calls like checking the data_version, configuring journal or page size), and ensure any tables created have STRICT applied.
So, it's perfectly okay for the poor to suffer terribly as long as it's out of your sight.

Got it.
Debs are very easy to make and their structure is easy to understand for anyone who's been using Linux for at least a couple months. They're just tarballs with a couple special text files. What's hard is Debian's official tools to make debs, which are geared towards people who want to become maintainers of packages in official Debian repos. If you don't aim to become one, there are third-party tools which make it easy, such as cargo-deb or holo-build. If you don't want to use them, you may also even write a shell script which will produce a good package. Just use lintian to double-check whether everything is alright.

RPM on the other hand is an over-engineered mess: <https://xyrillian.de/thoughts/posts/argh-pm.html>. Tangentially, YUM and DNF were the slowest package managers I've ever used. They're a real pain.
I have noticed multiple former colleagues where I work not bothering to update their profile when leaving.
If this were generally true, you'd see more polls erring in favor of Republicans. I can't recall any mainstream polling misses that have; do you have any references?
I work at a large tech company and we are routinely made aware of phishing scams on LinkedIn using our name – either fake profiles pretending to be an employee or even impersonating one of our actual employees.

People have:

* Tried to sell our product to others, despite not being affiliated with us

* Acted as recruiters for our company

* Tried to get jobs at other companies pretending to have an employment history with us

It's frustrating that we cannot do anything other than report it to LinkedIn, who may or may not take it down eventually.

The next time you are answering a LinkedIn DM, remember that anyone is allowed to write anything on there. None of it is verified.
Conservative principles are far more popular than the left wing dogma.

Abortion on day of birth
Secure boarders
Lower taxes and regulations.
Personal responsibility vs government handouts
Crime
Boys in girls sports.

Discus actual issues and many democrats will be shocked they they are in the wrong party.

But hey, endless personal attacks is a strategy as well.
Same. Laptops are a bit underpowered for the price but I appreciate flexible configuration and not having to tune/troubleshoot Linux myself. Love their new desktop with tabbing too
>>Norse mythology and for example week day names show clear similarities with the ancient roman and greek corresponding concepts

That's more likely due to the two cultures having a common Indo-European origin, from whence they inherited their language and mythology from, as opposed to cultural diffusion during the Roman era, I think.
Is there any way to download the highest quality audio track (format 141) in yt-dlp without using my cookies from my YT premium account? If that's possible then I'll consider dropping my subscription
> It gets access to your location, and it knows a ton about what videos you like, but is that really all that useful?

The app was regularly accessing the iOS clipboard (multiple times per minute), at least until iOS started telling users every time an app did that.

> But I'm unclear on just what kind of surveillance they think is going on here, or why the Chinese government would find it especially useful.

It doesn't have to be useful or make sense to be objectionable.

If the government wanted to know what color socks I'm wearing and designed a surveillance apparatus to collect that information without my consent, I would still object to it when I found out, even though that information seems utterly useless.