skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>The Russians themselves.

Ah. Now I suspect I know what you're talking about: the terror campaign. Essentially what Russia did in Syria - they don't stand a chance against a proper army, but they definitely can commit genocide and level entire cities, like they did in Mariupol.

So, yes, indeed, they are starting to do it again. But because they have already spent most of the tools they could use to do it - we know that because they are forced to use very expensive weapons in a way that doesn't make any sense, like attacking ground targets using anti-ship missiles - it will quickly fizzle out. They got one last push using Iranian ghetto-drones, but even those are in limited quantity - all of this stuff depends on western parts.
Wikidata is not solution at all.

I recently run into the same kind of problem in Wikidata.

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata_talk:WikiProject_Onto...

typical problem is of "light rail (Q1268865) is data visualization (Q6504956)" kind - this specific is fixed, but there are many similar

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Project_chat/Archive/...

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Project_chat#Ontology...
Right, but some people do. And the people who do, used to be people who don't. And those people became people who do because it was possible. It is a bit worrying to me that so many people will be growing up with devices with such a low "skill ceiling"; devices which don't let your interest in technology bloom but rather restrict what can be imagined.
How to Use NetSuite REST API with OAuth 2 and C# .NET
> If you’re using a higher level language, you’re not going to have access to how the memory is laid out. A simple change, like removing indirection in our list, was an order of magnitude improvement in our latencies since there’s memory prefetching in the compiler and the CPU can anticipate which vectors are going to be loaded next in order to improve the memory footprint.

This is a common experience and I'm still surprised by the choice I constantly see to use a managed-memory languages to build a database - one of a very small set of special cases where having full control over the memory layout might just be a reasonable thing to want. In this universe (absent doing something completely absurd) it's not algorithmic complexity but managing data locality in the cache hierarchy (e.g. reading things from L3 vs main memory vs disk) that makes things orders of magnitude faster, especially if you're in the realm of doing things like SIMD operations to speed things up.

Perhaps there's some level of suck we're willing to tolerate for all the other benefits you get, but I've been noticing a pattern of "align things just so at the higher level and hope they mostly turn out the way you want at the lower level" (e.g. also with the Apache java-y databases like hadoop / hbase / cassandra which I guess were mostly supposed to derive their total throughput from massive scale rather than per-node performance) which is a bit funny.

But also it seems like part of Rust's promise was "low level but make it high level" which seems to be succeeding (zero-cost abstractions and whatnot), so I imagine this will get better over time - having not attempted a project like this myself, I'm not sure what the limitations you'd run up against are in terms of laying things out in memory in a favorable way - I imagine the kind of massive manually managed arena allocations and ad-hoc pointers going everywhere that one normally does doesn't really fly.
not on windows (only platform I checked/care about)
> America has used its military not for defense but for bullying other countries to its will, benefiting our elites but hurting civilians everywhere. We're not the good guys anymore.

I agree that not everyone wants to build killer robots, but this is a phenomenally bad read of the global situation. America is increasingly absent from its commitment to allies. We mostly left NATO out to dry, we didn't do anything to provide allies with energy security, we've left countries to deal with their own terror cells.

Even countries that hate us are dreading us pulling our security forces. China doesn't want to be fighting off pirates in the Persian Gulf. Indonesia doesn't want the Strait of Malacca to become a warzone.
Science has finally identified the cause of the Black Death
I found it and it has subtitles: https://www.arte.tv/en/videos/101938-007-A/42-the-answer-to-...

Arte is quite known for its cultural tv and documentaries.

And your statistics is not saying much. Relevant is real life. Take a look at the documentary how people in El Salvador use crypto and not some white dude with too much money waiting for the next big thing.
That would be evidence they won't be able to use in court? It would be giving up on their sources at the least, even if they are not disclosed directly. I have my doubts in them being able to find out exactly which pilot gave the Chinese some specific piece of information. They would need a source that is part of the direct training, which I find a bit optimistic.
You are right, it does. Somehow I tested it some years ago and for some reason it didn't work back then, or I was stupid in the past. Thanks!
What are your thoughts on Zulip? Their priorities and yours seem to align. I see you have threads but they look more like Discord threads rather than how Zulip does them.
> most economists think that taxes should only be specifically targeted

Pigovian taxes ("tax bads not goods") are just about nobody's sole basis for taxation, and many oppose them altogether. Can you substantiate your claim, or was the caricature intentional?
It can also be read as 1/3 are walking:

> The remaining 1/3 are those who live close enough to the primary school that they are more likely to walk.
https://gitlab.com/magnolia1234/bypass-paywalls-firefox-clea...
Seems very similar in goal to the Solid Project, https://solidproject.org, which Tim Berners Lee is involved with and is being standardized by the W3C.
I live in a downtown century home neighborhood with the elementary school right around the corner (Waterloo region, Canada), and most kids walk, but there are a handful whose parents drop them off on nearby side streets or whatever. Possibly on the way to work or something? Obviously there may be individual considerations, but overall it just seems nuts that anyone would consider that option given how small the catchment is.

Anyway, the school has a tiny parking lot (like 20 slots) just for staff use, but they’re constantly facing calls to expand it, add “pull-in” spots, and so on. I’m glad they’ve been able to resist these as I could well imagine many parents teetering on the edge of comfort level with walking, and potentially switching if it was only slightly more convenient to drive or slightly more scary to walk.
App Store submissions now open for iOS 16.1 and iPadOS 16.1
That it all worked perfectly on my phone is testament to a ton of testing.
Product Management certainly predates Google by at least a generation. Indeed, Google is notoriously skeptical on the product management role and requires their product managers to have a technical background to at least some degree.
How could one "control" a federation protocol though?
And the alternative is a larger battery and a heavier headphone for something that goes directly in your ear.
>There's a finite amount of news you can report

Maybe we don't need 18 different 24/7 "news" channels? That's why we have these "filler" programs.

>But I think people are striving for an entirely objective media that simply doesn't exist, and never has.

News isn't sexy. News doesn't sell. Stoking emotions does, and that's why we are where we are. Even in the days of the newspaper, the OpEd section is what got attention.
> "Γ ⊨ φ" means that the string φ is true under some model of Γ.

It means that φ is true in every model of Γ.[0]

> If we have such a P in hand we can always check it, but if we don't have a P the question of whether or not one exists is generally an open one.

> The surprise is that it turns out that with only a very small amount of structure we lose "Γ ⊨ φ → Γ ⊢ φ".

That is not true for first-order logic. In first order logic Γ ⊨ φ → Γ ⊢ φ is always true. That's the completeness theorem.[1] This really only starts to become false when you go to e.g. second-order logic, but first-order logic is really the most commonly used type of logic and plenty sufficient for almost all of mathematics (though that becomes a philosophical debate to some extent).

Gödel's theorem is really about first-order logic, and it says that even though completeness of FOL is a nice thing, it doesn't help us with the goal of finding an effective theory of the natural numbers (effective in the sense that proofs are mechanically verifiable).

[0]: That's the standard definition, as it can be found e.g. in https://milneopentextbooks.org/download/friendly-intro-2e-up... (Definition 1.9.1) or https://books.google.it/books?id=u0wlXPHATDcC&pg=PA67#v=onep... (Definition 3.4.4 (iv)) and many other textbooks on logic.

[1]: See e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_completeness_th... - and every introductory textbook about about mathematical logic, including the ones referenced above.
Well for one, you need to pair nomad with consul and vault just to get remotely close. Then you are missing all the packages purpose built for k8s, the extensibility of k8s, and Nomad is built by a for profit company while k8s is purely OSS
Even in Eastern Europe, which is quite car centric by European standarda, kids typically live close enough to school to walk there, at least in cities. Also, public transport is very common, especially for older kids, whose don't want to be driven around by their parents but are neither old enough nor rich enough to drive a car.
You can use this style of logistical/pricing software across so many industries.
It probably depends upon where you live.

I've seen kids in our neighborhood walking to school alone as early as the 3rd grade. And we have a pack of young kids - ranging from 2nd grade to kindergarten, that regularly roam without adults.

So at least where I live, this doesn't appear to be much of a concern.
Because AI systems require large amounts of training data, the more the better, and requiring manual review of those datasets to ensure compliance with copyright would consume significant resources and slow down the pace of innovation across the entire AI industry.

Now let me flip that question around on you: What benefit would society gain from that forcing AI developers to do all that extra work?
I'm a lawyer and I also only travel with, and can do a lot (but not all) of my work on an iPad. I probably spend more on my iPad Pro + keyboard than I would for a laptop. But the iPad is also my primary e-reader, I watch movies on it, I take note on it legal pad style, etc. Google apps all suck on iOS so I don't use them. I occasionally remote in to a desktop for this or that, but less frequently.

I mostly find that nerds who don't like iPads have opinions that are like 5 years out of date. Trackpad support is great on iPads. The Files app is all I need on a portable device for file management. I can use any USB device I ever want (though in practice, I never do).
I care.

Programming languages give us different frameworks and guardrails to express computational tasks similarly to how written and spoken languages give us a different set of concepts with which to express ideas. New languages mean a potentially different way of thinking about a problem. Some ideas which are difficult to express in one language are trivial in another.

Discovering these differences is one of the joys of language learning. Language learning requires practice, and rewriting a known work (or translating it you might say) is a great way to deepen your understanding and test which ideas are easier or harder.
That sounds like saber rattling to me. Trying to scare diplomats with talk of armageddon to secure a better bargaining position. It's a constant of international politics and one shouldn't read too much into it. The same is true of North Korea talking about turning Seoul into a crater whenever they need to ask for food aid.
Yeah you are totally right, this wouldn't work for Twitter, FaceBook, etc. But it would help with the likes of CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, etc, who would all hold broadcasting licenses. It could help to build a core set of news providers that are held to a certain standard in my opinion.
It has some unbuildable hills on one side, the county hospital on another, and then parking lots plus a giant highway interchange filling out the rest of the space.
They will then vehemently defend how important it was for them to make airborne hyper-HIV because it will then help us understand how to protect us from airborne hyper-HIV.
Sure, these are called counter-serve restaurants. They appear to make up less than 10% of the restaurants in my area. If a restaurant launches as counter-serve, I guess it gets wait-free "technology" for free by accident.

What I'd like is for a "wait free" experience to spread beyond counter-serve. I have, very rarely, seen a QR code I can scan on the table allowing me to order and pay via phone. Then my food just arrives. That's seamless and frustration-free.
and then what? it will take several years to be operational. and people are afraid things might escalate within months.
The United States of Cussing: Every U.S. State's Favorite Swear Word
good argument, though I would counter by saying that partisanship is more to do with the decline of regional newspapers / broadcasters vs the nationals. Bigger market means you can afford to play to extremes to capture one edge of it, rather than cater for the whole
First, Statnews is not a "far right-wing news outlet".

Second, quoting from said Statnews article:

>But it has become apparent that the research team did not clear the work with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which was one of the funders of the project. The agency indicated it is going to be looking for some answers as to why it first learned of the work through media reports.

>Emily Erbelding, director of NIAID’s division of microbiology and infectious diseases, said the BU team’s original grant applications did not specify that the scientists wanted to do this precise work. Nor did the group make clear that it was doing experiments that might involve enhancing a pathogen of pandemic potential in the progress reports it provided to NIAID.

>“I think we’re going to have conversations over upcoming days,” Erbelding told STAT in an interview.

The BU press release does not address this at all.
We'd also share algorithms. Including evolution.
Ask HN: NDA for Interview
I have an interview loop scheduled with a YC company later this week. A recruiter sent me an NDA to sign…which is really odd to me.

The terms feel fairly benign but I’m also inclined to kindly reject to sign it. I am a California resident.

What do you think, how should I approach this issue?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_mailing_list ( https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/ ) is a fascinating, hilarious and interesting place.

Basically it is about an endless attempt to classify at least part of reality, in organically growing worldwide project based on bunch of passionate obsessive hobbyists with overly strong opinions.

With bonus of bunch of politics, confusion and passion.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API/Overpass_AP... is likely of interest.
I think it's easy to blame "the media" for poll results like this and to be fair I do think they deserve some of the blame. But I also don't think Americans' trust in the media is shaped by reasonable (or even coherent) criteria, and for that reason "just report the news" seems unlikely to be the solution.

Were the issue of trust really about a fairly and accurately reporting news, you'd expect the drop in trust in "mass media" to coincide with the rise of alternative media that does a better job on just reporting the news. But instead what you see is a rise in source that are basically just partisan propaganda barely even pretending to be legitimate news sources. This is especially true on the right side of the American political spectrum, where the biggest drop in mass media trust happens to be. If Republican problems with mainstream media is that the media doesn't just report the news, it seems odd that this would have led to the rise of Fox News and then Newsmax and OAN when Fox wasn't partisan enough.

This isn't just a Republican problem, although as they have the biggest shift in media trust I think it's fair to use them as the example. But overall, I think a simple explanation is that Americans increasingly see facts as subjective, and therefore the trustworthy news source is the one that provides me with facts that fit my existing worldview. There's a super obvious Trump divergence on the trust graph between Republicans and Democrats. Was it the case that Democrats suddenly thought the media was doing a better job just reporting the news and Republicans somehow came to the opposite conclusion? Or was it just that the Democrats liked the negative Trump coverage and Republicans didn't?
I honestly don't know which side the silent majority/plurality is on. What makes you think they're on FF's side? Probably vis-a-vis Chrome that's true, but there are several other up-and-coming browsers out there.

Also, TST isn't a FF-only feature now (Brave has started the rollout, Orion has a great implementation, and Edge has it also).

My personal path was decades with FF and its predecessors, then Brave because it was much, much faster. Now I'm debating between Orion (which might win on performance/battery, due to being webkit), Brave (which is fast, and is evolving its TST capability), and Firefox (which works fine, but IME is a bit slower).
If you're going to take what I say seriously, then I think you should focus first on the main point of the comment, and not a minor detail, but whatever. I can play ball.

Assuming Derek Lowe the author of the article, I feel like my first comment covered your question He's playing with the definition of a politically-charged word, claiming that a GOF experiment isn't so unless it successfully creates a more virulent virus. I get that the definition of words isn't set in stone and there can be ambiguity involved, but this seems like a very dishonest take on what GOF research actually is.

He even quoted a scientist whose conclusion is the exact opposite of his, that this is in fact GOF research, and failed to mention the fact!

To add to my original comment, he used the phrase "real virologist" at least three times. This is charged language that implies a lot of people in these conversations don't know what they are talking about. This is not the behavior I expect out of scientists. Well, that's not true anymore. Nowadays, this is unfortunately the kind of behavior I do expect out of scientists that write articles for sites like science.org.
> What I want for this usecase is a non-expiring PAT that is Organization instead of User based and can be tied to a single repo.

Authenticating as a Github App will give you that capability.
I only mentioned Win32. There this library is very inefficient compared to ReadDirectoryChangesW, which consumes no CPU times when nothing changes.
This is probably the most likely case. Malaria is a purely human disease with no animal reservoirs other than mosquitos as a vector. No malaria in the humans, no malaria in the mosquitos.
Just because they got a 'penalty' of 18k$ does not mean that they did not pay liability.
More from wikipedia:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z-order_curve

The Morton space-filling curve allows, for example, linear representations of 3D voxel spaces for efficient GPU rendering.

Do you understand the mechanism well enough to fix the tiny bug in the Go code?
More of a testament to the workers.
Really glad to see the work to take these tools to the next level. The feed view and the !mention are great tools, and have long been needed!
Changing genome is literally changing source code.

You just copied a new function moreEffectiveImmuneDodge() into a viral substrate that was previously lessEffectiveImmuneDodge()

This act of composition apparently created willStillTryToKillYou().withAMoreEffectiveImmuneDodge()

Look, I get it, you've gotta run a trial.

Do it in BSL4. Not BSL3. You are mixing snippets from two known, highly transmissable, highly pathogenic set of substrates. You should not be going into utilizing either of these ingredients as a chimera under the misguidedly optimistic thought you won't make something worse. The least you could do is demonstrate an elevated level of caution of your treatment of it until your experimental results prove the end result isn't as bad or worse than the originals.

How is that so hard an assumption to work under? If we're locking GoF behind "I succesfully created a more dangerous pathogen" rather than "I'm adding a feature to a virus that wasn't there", then GoF is a useless term.
I have a theory that requiring helmets would reduce bicycle usage, making people in general less healthy. It would also increase the ratio of cars to bikes, making roads more dangerous. I think the net effect would be worse outcomes.

I'd love to see evidence of this (either proving or disproving) but it seems like a hard thing to measure.

That said, I always wear a helmet when biking, but I never wear a helmet when driving, and I am aware of the irony.
Eh I don't have the numbers, but every company I've worked for has had lots of users. Their infra wasn't shrinking or growing much to make good use of k8s. Mainly they needed to link a bunch of runtime containers together built by different teams.

I get why people say k8s is complex, but there really isn't another great option for running a containerized service based architecture, maybe nomad
Under both Obama and Trump the US provided *direct* logistical and targeting support for the Saudi bombing of Yemeni targets. Biden finally stopped it in 2021. The humanitarian catastrophe in Yemen would not have happened without U.S acquiescence.

Saudi Arabia is not a U.S adversary, it is an ungrateful client state and has been since Roosevelt.
It’s hardly like that at all though.

300+ miles of range is plenty to get to a nearby city and back for most people, with or without supercharging.

The “very, very minor inconvenience” I referred to is the non-issue of having to find something to coil the cord onto when not in use, solved by most installed chargers which give you an hanging hook. BFD.
The second iraq war? Sure. Both are imperialist invasions based on false premises and lies
Covid has killed something like 20 million people (taken from Wikipedia, estimated based on excess deaths). It's plausible that it came from a lab leak. How bloody fucking valuable do you have to think "making viruses more deadly and studying them" is for this to be worthwhile?

Oh, actually you can calculate this, assuming you're utilitarian and think risking innocent lives is OK as long as it saves that many lives in expectation. If you think there's a 10% chance that Covid came from a lab leak, then the "making viruses more deadly" research that we've done so far ought to have saved more than 10% * 20 million = 2 million people. Did it? From what I've heard it's done fuck-all.

I stand by my pissed off voice here. I think it's appropriate to be pissed off about risking millions of lives for hypothetical benefits.

(To be clear, I'm only talking about research that studies deadly extinct viruses and deadly lab-created viruses. We should absolutely continue to study viruses in general.)
yes you might be right.
The other dozen poor soles who probably died in work related accidents today don't count as they have nothing to do with Elon Musk.
Firms issue unrelated news when SEC disclosure is bad news
Orchestrating Data/ML Workflows at Scale with Netflix Maestro
This simplicity translates to afternoons of work lost to CMake.

cargo just works, and isn't really complex in design. just less anticated.