skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> I understand how hard it may be to maintain software these days ...*

I can't see it being harder than during the forming years with ever-changing libs and tools. Haven't seen a new end-user desktop app on Linux for over a decade either.
Once the environment is safe for kids you don't have to do as many logistics for your children.

You might be interested in this "Not Just Bikes" video about raising kids in non car dependent places: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHlpmxLTxpw

or this one about kids who bike to school in a group for safety: https://bikeportland.org/2022/10/13/portlands-bike-bus-featu...
The parent comment literally says that their users always had the choice, but don't let me interrupt your knee jerk reaction.

> A win win for everyone is if Google allowed the user to turn this feature on manually in settings post app install but they don’t do that.

That is exactly how the Android permission model already works. But now Google/Play Store is enforcing additional restrictions on developers that use these permissions.
Kintosh is great and is a very thorough implementation that is not simple remapping from linux/windows to mac analogs, but also considerate of conflicts in various applications as well. I believe in terminal emulators in Linux, for example, cmd+v will send ctrl+shift+v instead of simply ctrl+v.

There's some drawbacks, though. Wayland support doesn't exist. It's still a "hack" rather than a system wide adoption of MacOS keybind paradigms. It can't possibly account for all edge cases.

I would say if you're looking for advanced remapping of keys in linux you might want to look at Interception Tools[1] since it works on both X and Wayland, though programmable keyboards with QMK or ZMK are still going to generally be a better option.

[1] https://gitlab.com/interception/linux/tools
Users can decline the permission. Additionally it sounds like this was an optional part of the flow ("possibility")
Apple & Google capricious integration policies are often user hostile.

Seems like it would be much better to let people decide what quality they want from their doorbell rather than mandating it as part of the integration.

I don't want to store 1080p 30fps video all the time and have it consume the entire 50gb that I buy with iCloud.
> LinkedIn is purposefully ignorant in the hopes of driving fake engagement.

From Upton Sinclair Quotes:

It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.
Alternatively: https://archive.ph/J108i
It’s the same thing in all cases: the meaning is in general “open to the general public”, often by opposition to what came before or what was the norm at the time (private schools, private salons, and unlisted companies respectively; in all cases you needed to get invited or accepted somehow and entry was restricted).

The issue is that language drifted and now “public” generally means “owned by the public” rather than merely “open to the public”.
> But it's not some world wide conspiracy against women.

Your first sentence indicates that you (correctly) think there is a world-wide conspiracy against women, it's just not as prevelant in some locations and recent history.

I'm amazed (and strangely optimistic) about the fact that people could assume this is a myth. Optimistic in that it suggests that they've grown up in a better world, just as people would be amazed if you told them when it became legal to marry outside your race, or illegal to be denied bank account based on being a woman, etc. I'd prefer they were both appalled and informed, but if we're only going to get one then appalled is better.
> labelling speech/media one disagrees with as a threat to democracy is in itself a threat to democracy

Doesn't mean it's incorrect, though. Doing something is tricky, for sure, but doing nothing is fatal.
>We are excited to kick off the Sovereign Tech Fund with a pilot round of projects. The pilot is an opportunity to showcase examples of open digital infrastructure, and to test the model we outlined in our feasibility study published in 2021. The following projects will receive funding starting October 2022:
>OpenMLS
>curl
>OpenBGPd
>Bundler/RubyGems
>WireGuard
>OpenPGP.js/GopenPGP
>OpenSSH
RCT3's first person riding feature was neat, but the bump in performance requirements meant that building large sprawling parks just wasn't as practical. I've never tried it on modern hardware though.
Many people are unaware that "so naming" [0] solves multiple versions of the same library problem.

My Debian installation regularly has two or three versions of the same library (e.g. libx264) installed while packages update and start to use newer versions of the same library.

[0]: https://tldp.org/HOWTO/Program-Library-HOWTO/shared-librarie...
Love tailscale! Set it up a couple weeks ago and it’s very fun to use. MagicDns is great! I can go http://macmini anywhere and it just works

Just wish they offered more subnet routers. I’m as much hobby as hobby can be, and already hit the limit (one on my mini k8s cluster, one at home, that’s it. They don’t allow you to have more). Been stuffing the sidecar awkwardly into everything to get around it

If someone from tailscale is reading this - please consider upping the limit of subnet routers. I’ll have to switch to ZeroTier once I want another one which doesn’t have those restrictions.

Even paying for the hobby pro plan is just upping it from 1 -> 2
There are many possibilities, but the point stands that it’s clearly a very biased sample. Almost 80% of people between 65-74 are registered voters but that’s still a long way from 95%.
Please don't criticize the downvoting system, you will get in trouble.
Definitely. Though I wouldn’t have done any better at 19. Teens aren’t known for eloquence or having the proper amount of confidence.
This is nice and all and maybe it works in Paris, but the main problem with American cities that prevents transit and cycling and being car free is that the crime is too high and the car acts as a natural barrier to that when you have to be in an urban area.

It's true. I went from taking transit everywhere to my transit stop becoming a gang hotspot, and now I drive. Would love to take the train again, but my city was greatly affected by the environmental disaster known as defunding the police.
>others say their “low-libido” husbands can watch endless pornography,

>They can’t erase the influence of porn or social media.

Or, they can and should.
I haven't tried Arch, but in my experience changing those things in Ubuntu setup is simple and can be done in the GUI installer - I do it every fresh install. I haven't tried changing the bootloader; haven't had the need to.
Even the big paper publishers say "No conclusive evidence for either theory."

https://www.science.org/content/article/do-three-new-studies...

>> Still, Worobey and his co-authors concede, even that evidence might not be enough to end this polarizing debate. “With the way that people have been able to just push aside any and all evidence that points away from a lab leak, I do fear that even if there were evidence from one of these samples that was full of red fox DNA and SARS-CoV-2 that people might say, ‘We still think it actually came from the handler of that red fox,’” Worobey says.
There are some interesting/hilarious media bubbles showing up in the replies to this comment.
It’s not just here. In every thread on this page that commenter is piping up with single sentence whataboutisms.

“But the CIA” is not “discuss[ing] it further” either. I’d be happy to discuss it properly. But reddit-like pithy stuff like this is not that.

Oh and China just assaulted and kidnapped protesters in the UK. Like, within the last couple of hours.
Because they don't support free speech or opposing positions and have never pretended to, whereas we believe that truth will set you free and sunlight is the best disinfectant?
That would involve admitting you're a niche company/service and not headed for global dominance. Can't do that.
Probably true, but it's not going to happen without a huge amount of additional surveillance. I'm a daily rider and in all honesty I ignore speed limits when I'm away from habitation. Nothing crazy, but definitely illegal. For the most part I'm pretty responsible, and keep to well within limits around where people live. But there's no denying that speed is part of the appeal - I whizz past all cars (because I prefer to be away from them), zip around bendy country roads (because it's fun). I don't even have a fast bike, and I find it hard to stay within limits. I'm in my 50's and have only had one accident - an off-road mud-slip in the middle of nowhere resulting in a broken ankle .. and a long walk.
Is there any objective way to define and measure productivity at companies like Twitter and estimate how few people they could get away with? The story implies they have 4/3×5600 employees which I could easily be convinced is a lot to do what they do. Likewise with Google and Facebook (who both give the impression of doing way more research and product development so you'd expect more people) - it's certainly plausible that the my could run their core business with way fewer people. Obviously the status quo will push against any changes, it would be interesting to see some information on what a reasonable size is
The version in the Golang stdlib defaults to a pure-go implementation... unless you're compiling for amd64, in which case you get an assembler variant apparently directly derived from the XKCP package (https://github.com/golang/crypto/blob/master/sha3/keccakf_am...).

Slightly concerning news for the (mostly-Golang-based) Ethereum ecosystem, which relies on SHA3-256 for pretty much everything...
An example video:

https://github.com/AliceInWinterlandGithub/window-recorder--...
Are you planning to be equivalent in notoriety/influence as Martin Luther King Jr? If not, the motivation/incentives for domestic law enforcement to target you aren’t really there. It would be a waste of their time and finite resources.

The PRC has a bit different motivations/incentives and theirs are not aligned with a perceived U.S. national security interest.

Whether you and I agree with the US national security apparatus's mission, in my opinion, it is at least more oriented towards safeguarding/promoting the US’ self-interest.

That’s not to say I agree with all of its actions, just trying to explain what I mean when I say there is difference in motivations and incentives.
That depends on who you are. And if that’s your point, you should just make that point instead of Reddit-like single sentence whataboutisms.

China just assaulted and kidnapped HK protesters in the UK.
Depends on which part of that quote...

I believe every single member of all 3 have an ethical duty to the truth

I think a significant number of all 3 groups have forgotten that, or believe something else take precedent further I believe every member of all 3 groups knows about a co-member of the group that has ignored or violated their ethical duty and looked the other way, or actively covered for that abuse
For those who don't know, IntelliJ IDEA also has this. (I'm not affiliated with them at all, but I do love their IDEs.)

Personally, I tried it once and was too weirded out — I've lived with the side panels for so long that it feels wrong without them there, minimized and providing a nice little frame for my thoughts.
Why stop there? We don't need no stinkin' emails at all because back in my day, we used to send letters through the post!

Even if you save it as a draft, you'd still need a way to sync it between your devices. Handoff makes it simple and convenient.
A/B Testing System or Feature Flags
The accusation of sloppiness is based on two claims, and you're only responding to a bastardization of one of them.
Still has to feed the computer moves
They don't even need to. The money all goes to the same place. They can just "take a loss" in the division making the product where the loss is the fee they paid to the other division of Amazon.

Then they can claim they're playing fair.
I'd broadly agree with you.

There is a discussion to be had about what services should be available under common carrier or common carrier like terms, and what should not.

I'd argue that at least in the internet sphere, at least DNS, Access (either ISP or peering), and probably payments of some measure should be. I don't think PAAS systems ought to be, you can do without them, nor do I think hosted services (email, simple hosting, whatever) should be either.

We have an issue online where unfettered anonymous free speech is largely untenable in the current regulatory environment, I think that should be changed.

I also hold the view that unfettered anonymous free speech is broadly unworkable because it removes the feedback loop between speech and response to it - but that's a separate issue for society to work out, and shouldn't really be up to big corporations to fix (often poorly) on their own.
> If you replace a .txt file with random html data bad things are going to happen.

Bad things are already happening. Random HTML data is no less useful than no data at all.

> Tell me, how does CF put a 'Checking your browser' page in my `wget https://easylist.to/easylist/easylist.txt`

By serving the HTML instead (with JS that does whatever checks and then redirects to the intended resource), and if the client can't cope with that, then tough shit; the absurdity of such arbitrary evaluation of whether or not clients are sufficiently browsery to be worthy of consuming bandwidth aside, ain't "only browsers directly navigating to this will be able to cope with this and gain access" exactly the point of using such JS-based client checks in the first place?
I think using an integrated nuclear reactor would be a better solution than using ammonia fuel. Better energy efficiency, increased speeds, reduced fuel handling costs, and greater operational flexibility are clear advantages. I would also argue the environmental risks are reduced.
I'm not a big fan of democracies following the path of dictatorships.
I’m sure they could, but how many people have Ethernet at their doorbell? We recently built a new home, so I had the opportunity to hardwire all of our cameras, except the doorbells. There just weren’t great options that I could find. Luckily the Amcrest doorbells I chose have been rock solid. They support rtsp, so my NVR records them just like the rest of the cameras.
Gone for me. Archive.org link: https://web.archive.org/web/20221018214742/https://get.netat...
Tailscalar here. For what it's worth there's no hard limit on subnet routers at this time. My personal tailnet is using 8 of them.
I just meant driving in reverse. I switched from a 1998 Nissan Maxima to a 2019 Toyota Camry. With the Nissan Maxima it was easier to look out the rear view mirror or turn around and see what was going on behind the car. With the Camry it seems that you really need to use the backup camera.

I can't find anything authoritative on this so it could be I was mistaken but it was my understanding modern cars have more blind spots in order to increase crash safety performance and the backup camera is supposed to compensate.

Here's a reddit post by someone saying they are a former automotive engineer who discusses this but obviously using a reddit post as a source is not ideal:

https://www.reddit.com/r/NoStupidQuestions/comments/q1jart/c...
> Snap makes sense...

No. When we have flatpak and appimage, snap makes zero sense. I just see it as a way to implement a centralized walled garden into the OS, and don't install Ubuntu systems even in VMs for five minute test drives.

The way Canonical rolled it out is flat out insulting to the free software community and distro culture, IMHO.

It's too late here to write about its technical problems, so I'll leave it at that.
Cul de sacs are for street hockey.
> It doesn't have to be a car - but it needs to be exclusively under my control, and it needs to be close to my front door.

Sounds like you should give bicycles a try.

Or unironically, any last-mile foldable vehicle that you can bring with you on public transportation. Will solve most of your issues.
Better use of async communications with your co-workers helps significantly.
Elon Musk plans to get rid of 75% of 'low' performers after acquiring Twitter
GothamChess is amazing in general. He’ll be casting an upcoming chess tournament (kind of like football commentators, but chess). So hyped for it. If you haven’t seen him before, check out some of his other vids too — he does a variety of styles, like “Guess the ELO” and 1:1 chess tutorials with other popular non-chess streamers.

I think the most impressive thing is that he’s posted a video every single day for… I don’t know how long. He makes it a point of pride not to miss one.
What makes you think that Kadyrov is Putin's likely successor? Anything could happen, of course; but as a Chechen and a demonstratively, fervently devout Muslim, Kadyrov would be an even scarier figure for the outwardly Orthodox Russians than Stalin was.
It used to be, in the pre-internet 20th century, that people would exploit mismatches between paper stores of information to forge fake identities and game the system.

https://www.edenpress.com/productcart/pc/viewPrd.asp?idprodu...

Now, in 2022, people are just using the mismatches between various Big Tech walled gardens to do the same.

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
Metahacking: GDB
i thought sha-2 included the message length in the head padding to prevent length extension attacks?

just read the link you provided: it's sha-224 and above.

i wonder if a similar issue exists in the sha-224+ padding code.
As the Dining Philosopher's Problem is meant to elucidate, it's not possible to do this.

This is after all why programs keep getting higher latency even though chips have gotten faster for decades. If we could solve more than one problem in a way that's concurrent with each of the problems (computing "parallelly"? dunno), we wouldn't have this problem.

In conclusion, we must solve a problem that isn't the topic of this article before we address the topic of this article.

(Note: I'm hungry, so I won't be able to respond to this thread for an indeterminate amount of time...)

Edit: clarification made before I started to deal with my hunger problem (obviously)
> Also once the superblocks are built, crime increases (no traffic ie witnesses)

No offense but this sounds like a classic reactionary anti-bike cliché, so would you mind sharing some sources?
People in America will sue because the "crunchberries" in breakfast cereals aren't real berries.

That doesn't mean they'll win, but even a bogus lawsuit is expensive and time-consuming.

https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/judge_tosses_suit_cl...
It doesn't require 7,500 people to keep the lights on.
Yes they can - once the market stops believing them, private equity takes them private, cuts costs massively and streamlines, then gets re-acquired or goes public again much improved - minus the founder.
I guess the surprise comes from the fact that there's a lot of supply as well.
I don't think Mussk will keep running the status quo. Entire departments and long-standing projects will be axed, and sights set on one or more new major milestones.

Logically and practically speaking, the cuts will be focused on retaining employees perceived or known to be loyal to Master, and then backfill hiring folks who will work "really hard" without questioning too much or complaining.

The relative "openness" Twitter enjoys today will transition to secrecy and proprietary-ness, similar to the way Tesla and Space-X both operate.
I got a brief suspension on twitter recently for 'harassment' for calling a journalist stupid for analyzing something in a nonsensical way to defend the status quo. Mocking powerful people with bad takes was one of the highlights of the platform and they are taking that away because they are too afraid of losing the bluechecks to another platform (which, to be fair, is probably an existential risk for them in their current state).
In what way is this secret? It’s in the View section and not really hidden imo.
This is exactly why Stability's role as a middleman in these model releases is an indefensible business position. The research underlying stable diffusion does not belong to them, so any company which wants to fund the training of the next iteration of these models can easily step in and fill their role. And since Stability itself is not pioneering this line of research (rather, they are just facilitating the training and distribution of models), they will always be lagging behind other companies which employ the researchers themselves (i.e. Runway's apparent position in this debacle). Stability's role as middleman has been so far innocuous if not generally helpful, but now that this role has a market price of $1B, companies and researchers are going to be eager to cut them out of the process and reap the rewards for themselves.
Sometimes a 75% workforce cut is exactly what a company on its deathbed needs. In the case of Twitter they wouldn't even need to fire anyone. Just make employees sign a statement reaffirming their commitment to free speech and the 1st Amendment (ala forced DEI statements at other companies) and 75% of Twitter employees would likely depart on their own.
> Why would Europe sit idly by while the US unilaterally reshapes their energy policies?

Because these are our client states. NATO's purpose is to bend Europe's will across the Atlantic and away from having mutually beneficial relationships with Africa and Asia.

They aren't our allies; they are our client states. The European leaders align with what Washington wants, and not what the majority of their people want. The US doesn't have allies... only interests.

We are crushing German industry; this is beneficial to us, because it allows our industry to thrive and helps reshore production. We get to sell more energy to Europe; this is beneficial to us... and so on.
Honest question. Are these laws being put forward by groups who only want a plausible excuse to violate people's privacy, or is it misguided people who genuinely care about stoping child exploitation and don't care about the profound effects of privacy?

I'm guessing the answer is 'both' but I was hoping someone might have insight if it leans one way or the other.
Shortest serving UK prime minister in history during death of longest ruling monarch in UK history.
Well-known roads (often 'twisties') attract riders who want to hoon around. In countries with lax licensing standards, there can be hundreds of testorerone-addled teens riding motorcycles they have no idea how to handle, and (like so many young males) little concern for anyone outside their circle. Not remotely representative of motorcyclists as a whole (in fact it's an ageing demographic).
US provided weapons have been killing a lot of Russians lately with bipartisan support. Russia should probably raise their salaries.
Discussion here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33281645
That isn't "freedom" - that's coercion. If you want to bargain collectively, go ahead. But in a free country I would be able to fire all of you and replace you immediately.
The problem isn't full support, it's active hostility of those who are "loyal" to Johnson.
well then, I'm going to not subscribe even harder
SHA3 is relatively infrequent compared to sha1/2 and md5. SHA3 also has a few variants, and I don't know for sure if this vulnerability is present in all variants.

The vulnerability is only present in the reference implementation. So it's unlikely that other implementations (rush as Rust or Go) are vulnerable.

I tested with the latest released and master branches of PHP, both of which segfaulted for the code samples mentioned in the article. The article says Python is also vulnerable.this is because both of the languages apparently use the reference implementation.

Ethereum uses SHA3 quite extensively, but I doubt it's vulnerable post migration from PoW, let alone it's unlikely that they use the vulnerable implementation/variant.