skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> The key question that everyone, especially SpaceX, should be asking is why was it even possible to run the test while Cabada was in an unsafe place?

absolutely.

lockout/tagout may seem unnecessary, but it's specifically to avoid exactly these types of situations. Not is it not possible for someone to be in an unsafe place, it's not possible for miscommunications such that it BECOMES unsafe after the fact because that lockout is with a lock no one else can unlock except the person who did it.

It obviously requires humans actually DO the procedures, but I think that's part of the point with the question.
They can if they fit the criteria for EB1A or EB2 NIW. I don't think most of H1B recipient fit the criteria for those visas.
Git has a lot of options for managing credentials ( https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Tools-Credential-Storage https://git-scm.com/docs/gitcredentials https://docs.github.com/en/authentication/keeping-your-accou... ). For MFA: https://github.com/GitCredentialManager/git-credential-manag...

The simplest thing is to create a ~/.netrc file:

machine foobar.atlassian.net login myuser1@mycompany.com password isudfiusldifuslkjhdflksjhdf
machine bitbucket.org login myotheruser password kjsdoihohuaoivhdifhuvoiadhf
machine github.com login companyuser1 password ghp_oisjdofhowuefoiusiofus
machine github.com login personaluser2 password ghp_jf9huiehuwfsouyewuhifuh
machine circleci.com login myotheruser password lkjdhiufwhu8ef7yw8yoefhozheofuhouha4lhlWiur

Clone a repository like git clone https://companyuser1@github.com/foo/bar.git and Git will load the right login automatically.
Yeah, that's the main one I had in mind. API key lets you select what characters to include, which features are visible for that API key, etc. I want to say I wrote code that interacted with these back in 2012 or so and this wasn't new.

Meanwhile GitHub just got scoped API keys in 2022. Cloudflare got scoped API keys maybe last year or two years ago? Like to me this has felt like a baseline of API token design for a long time.
Just in case you need another data point.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/hong-kong-protesters-turn...

Having lived through this, it's a bit funny to me that most people aren't aware the Chinese crackdown on Hong Kong protests was led by British officers on the field. Inconvenient truths I guess.
Sort of correct, it only covers the front or the back (exclusive or), not both simultaneously. So when it's being used as a hand-held tablet the back will be covered, but when it's used as a stand the back is mostly uncovered, and when the front is covered the back is uncovered.
Reading this article does, in fact, increase my trust that my Facebook account won't be randomly, irrevocably banned one day a la google.

The trouble is, that's not my primarily distrusted thing about facebook; I don't trust that the power they have to shape people's opinions by deciding what to show them, won't be abused to make people think things that are good for facebook but bad for society at large.

So while that article does increase my trust in facebook in general, the magnitude of that increase is miniscule, because what it addresses is not the reason for lack of trust.

But you're right that transparency wouldn't solve that. Because it's only the first step. If facebook were to transparently say "we are promoting far right conspiracy theories because it makes us more money", and provide a database of exactly which things they were boosting, while perhaps I would "trust" them, I certainly wouldn't "like" them.
Meta owning Giphy is anticompetitive, but Microsoft bundling Teams for (basically) free is fine?
None of this tech nerdery means a whole lot without "skin in the game." First, ensure that we have real liability and/or regulation in place, similar to the FDA and such, and THEN begin to work on solutions. I'm certain answers will reveal themselves much quicker.
CDC request for comment on vote to add Covid mRNA to child immunization schedule
>snubbed their noses

The PCA "rulings" aren't international law because UN (which PRC accept as international system) has no formal position on them / has not adopted any parts of the decision. Ergo, PRC's SCS position is consistent with international law - like the actual one at UN, not make believe US "rules based order" which was behind PCA lawfare campaign and the ongoing propaganda.

PRC is more firmly within bounds of the "world system", versus US who tries to enforce FONAPs despite not ratifying UNCLOS, and doesn't respect the kind of international law that it accused PRC of violating, see ITLOS ruling (an actual UN ruling) regarding UK/US military base on Chagos/Mauritius/Diego Garcia.
Tags end up being an excellent finding aid due to the strength of the community's tag linking, you see. So they serve both purposes.
Yep. You can actually use WebKit to render PDFs in Linux and it works perfectly fine as well. Performance problems seem to be most prevalent when you browse them in a web browser.
> Chances of this "escaping" the lab and producing another coronavirus wave are zero because that already happened.

Are you aware of any situation where the omicron spike and Wuhan backbone could have recombined naturally? As far as I know, the latter was extinct in the wild by the time the former emerged.

It's good that the omicron/delta variant didn't blow up in humans. The omicron/Wuhan variant seems like another throw of the dice, though, and even a very small probability times millions of potential deaths is significant.
That was 95% when I first heard this years back
I didn't notice anything worse during 2019 than during previous years. There were fewer calls to sanitation, if anything, or perhaps the calls didn't stand out to me anymore. Either way, while you're probably right that the earliest cases of covid were probably already there, it's not as though "the congress flu" (never heard anyone call it 'plague', either) was because of covid, or because of covid even just that year.
Probably ~/.netrc can handle per repository tokens
> They're not taken seriously as an enterprise productivity solution by anyone.

Because anyone who can create a great presentation would never think of things as "enterprise productivity solutions". They'd just make an awesome presentation.
Because openness about failure is indicative of willingness to accept criticism. Doesn't mean they need to accept fault.

Being completely silent on the matter gives the appearance that they are pretending it didn't happen, that they want no one asking questions about it.
> What happens if I get hit by a bus or leave the company?

What happens now if you get hit by a bus and the token you issued is leaked, and someone has to rotate it? I would assume you have that documented, tested, preferably automated?
> Try to build a plane that way I dare you.

This may be why modern Boeing is so fucked.

source: worked on the 787 program, the hardware for our team was selected before there was a team. Our part was only successful and on time in large part because I'm a stubborn asshole.
I can't really speak to this because I no longer own or can afford a Mac, I just know it did the trick for me in the past.

The reality of our tangled mess that is data privacy issues is really almost grotesque at this point.
In my experience, it's way too easy for engineers to geek out on the how without addressing the "why". I'm guilty of this myself, from time to time.

When product is leading the charge, it often means they've validated a need from a customer and are ready to address it. When engineering leads, they're often pushing a capability without having evaluated it against customer needs.
What else should you know about email size rules? Find the list of the best tips to craft perfect emails to be received by any email client without going to spam. Check how you can test them with Mailtrap.
Relevant quote from the article:

> In the accident involving Cabada, OSHA’s accident investigation summary noted that “the final step in the pressure check operation, venting, was done for the first time using an automated program as opposed to the normal manual method that had been used in previous operations.”
"Virtually unreal"? It's how humans evolved for hundred thousands years.
The UK doesn't want companies with excessive monopoly power operating in their country. What's difficult to understand about that?
Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience
Work becomes enjoyable when the experience that arises out of work itself is likeable
Generals who oversaw Abu Ghraib are no different.

Pax Americana is definitely crumbling before our eyes.
Ashby (YC W19) Is Hiring Engineers to Build Powerful, Intelligent Software
This is why it's important for folks to understand exactly what they are contributing to a company's bottom line. This is easier for sales roles where they can point to closed deals, but more difficult for IT roles who's job is to keep the lights on.
Right, I meant necessary from the companies perspective. The author was certainly bringing to question the necessity of the industry from the broader perspective, his reference to Gil Scott Heron's song couldn't have made that clearer.
Not a universal path. It depends on their employer benevolence, or them matching a specific criteria of excellence, which I'm assuming many won't.

Compare with other countries, where the eligibility for residency is automatic for all foreign workers for have worked in that country for a given amount of time.
I know a lot of immigrants who can get an offer for concurrent employment for 5-10 hours a week at smaller companies that don't make as many headlines as a company like Coinbase.

It's a lot cheaper to get qualified for an O-1A or EB-1A than an EB-5 if you're just comparing financial investment.
What does our dedication have to do with if not that?

Why are you so quick to dismiss being protective of such an important resource as a motivation to protect Taiwan?
"already-proven-unreliable"

How so?
> For all it's faults. C++ (along with other languages) already has an international standards body.

Not everybody in the C++ community is convinced this is a benefit.
Do you just like reading your own words, because that's a lot of words for yourself to keep saying "no that's not what I'm talking about" yet everyone who has come in has been on the same page, except you.
Taiwan is also the center of a lot of specialist equipment (not the big swiss-watch ASML machines, but stuff like wafer transports, cleanroom gear, etc.) and consumables (chemicals, bunny suits, etc.). I don't know how extensive and fragile that ecosystem is but I live in eastern Michigan and it seems like every small to midsize town has some tiny automotive supplier that is somehow still in business even while the big plants have moved on. I suspect this is largely because they have no competitors and it is specialist work that doesn't really scale (meaning there is only so much of this work to go around, even if global auto sales 10x) so no one is really motivated to compete either. The result is that the GM and Ford plants leave the country, but still rely on a relatively small set of expertise and tooling that only exist in the rust belt. Presumably, a thorough nuking of the Midwest would (in addition to lots of other unpleasant effects, like the death and famine millions, perhaps billions) at least require the pause of the majority of auto manufacturing around the globe. Assuming people still wanted cars after such an event, it could be recovered, but it would take time.

I got a little carried away with the Michigan analogy, but IMO it doesn't go far enough: Taiwan is far more integral to the global semiconductor industry than Detroit is to the global auto industry.
So, wait. It's not gain-of-function research unless they successfully make a more dangerous virus? These "scientists" are getting so much better at politics. Playing with the definitions of words is a class political tactic!

I'm going to quote one of the scientists the article actually quoted themselves:

"Now, the outcome of the experiment was not clear. You could have assumed that the virus, compared to the ancestral virus is less pathogenic (which was the case). But it could also have been more pathogenic. Therefore, these experiments need to be done in appropriate biosafety laboratories. And, if the virus can become more pathogenic and falls into certain categories, you also need permission from the US government to perform the experiment - especially if they fund your research. And that is what was not done here."

Later on, on the same subject, he literally says: "Having said all that, I absolutely think GOF research should be tightly regulated and controlled."

Our scientific institutions surely have become wholly corrupted by politics. This is gain-of-function research. Whether you think that type of research should be conducted or not is moot. The scientist quoted said he thinks this was not dangerous GOF research, but still needed to be tightly regulated.
No use case, got it
Because you can't get any accurate information out of them?
Paperlike is pretty pricey. I bought a similar screen cover on Amazon Canada by Bellmond for CAD$20. Works great!
In other words, Barilla are afraid their customer base are becoming so economically challenged (global recession, European energy crisis, etc.) that they can't readily afford the energy to boil pasta and this will negatively affect pasta sales volumes.
Yes, but these things exist because our brains reason this way, not because they are constants of nature. Other intelligent beings could have different non-symbolic ways of gathering and processing information about nature, such as evolving cellular automata adequate to represent and solve problems.
Because of what, then?
Meta-comment here, but it’s somewhat notable that this is the very first link submitted to HN from Semafor, which is a new media company started by Justin Smith, formerly of Bloomberg and The Atlantic, and Ben Smith, formerly of The NY Times and founding editor of Buzzfeed News.

And it hit the top of the front page—not bad for a first impression.
We love Mattermost for our organization; it feels nicer to use it over Slack/Discord because we're also FOSS. Our next iteration is to be moving to a more protocol oriented method - which means Matrix or ActivityPub even.

We don't care if our chat is search-indexed; it's mostly internal; there are client channels, specific topic channels. At least for our case being OUT OF SEARCH is better. However, we do use the conversation as seeds for our help-docs, blog post, etc, etc.

Perhaps Linen could be the winner by putting Slack+Discord+Mattermost+Matrix+ActivityPub in to a better search-index.

Anyone remember MARC? -- https://marc.info/
The key to this is to only hire "product" people who grew out of either Design or Engineering, Anyone who started as "product" is a wanna be general who provides minimal value.

My usual first question to any product candidate is do you find yourself coming from a Design, UX, or Engineering background?
Satori does run in node runtime.

vercel/og (a wrapper around Satori) does not support node
I have a personal rule.

If I can't walk there within an hour, or the bus itself takes more than an hour to get there; I won't even apply to the job. My method of thinking on this is that people with their own vehicle won't go much further than an hour away anyways, so why would I with a bike, my own two feet; or transit for that matter.

It's not like the people they are hiring with vehicles are going to get there much faster if they own a vehicle taking the same amount of time. The only time this won't be true is if they live so close they really should be walking instead to save money.
Samsung is concerned Google is losing customers to Apple.
You can loose your green card if there is a suspicion you do not plan to continue to reside in the US (in theory, every time you cross the border, the customs agent can decide to revoke your green card on the spot. Luckily, this usually doesn't happen).
The fact that you can do all your work on an iPad as well as you could do it on a Laptop may say more about your work than the devices. I do not mean this in an insulting way, but perhaps your work is so disconnected from technology or the creative process that you could do it, no matter the device you're using?
> lockout/tagout may seem unnecessary, but it's specifically to avoid exactly these types of situations. Not is it not possible for someone to be in an unsafe place, it's not possible for miscommunications such that it BECOMES unsafe after the fact because that lockout is with a lock no one else can unlock except the person who did it.

And despite many comments in this discussion thread asserting that safety reduces progress and speed, lockout/tagout and similar procedures reduce the number of accidents and mishaps. That leads to less downtime spent picking up the body parts or cleaning a corpse out of the equipment. This is one of those "slow is smooth, smooth is fast" things. Get into a good routine with good safety measures and you can get shit done instead of cleaning up shit.
Single employee is 11$/hour in Chicago unless they are a domestic worker.

$15.40 for employers with 21 or more employees (including all domestic workers, regardless of the number employed) $14.50 for employers with 4-20 employees

https://www.chicago.gov/city/en/depts/bacp/supp_info/minimum...

But, you can subtract reasonable room and board fees, so actual cost could be lower if you had a spare room and someone was willing to take the job.
We’re not moving to the web totally unless the web recreates there UI features we already get on desktop. I have to juggle a half dozen apps at a time no matter how much I automate.

VR/AR makes people feel sick and are fundamentally uncomfortable in a way a screen not strapped to your face isn’t.
>I only support the concept of negative rights, so you in that context you should have the right to seek healthcare from the provider of your choice free from government regulations, but I do not believe the government or anyone has the duty to provide you with care.

That makes sense with your positions, and I don't view long debates on fundamental positions to be productive on the Internet, ask not what your country can do for you and all that. I do hope life is always good to you and you'll never be in a position where you'd be left without access to care for an extended period; that gnawing fear of going bankrupt from your own body does terrible things to people.
I don't think the spreading would be reduced with fewer people if the venue is at capacity, presuming a similar people per m² regardless of the venue.
These cost levels are either employing a lot of service (valet, doorman, etc) or are under-accrued for the big CapEx bills they have coming due (careful!)
> As a side note, I’m using metric units here, but you can *switch* to the imperial system if you prefer.

Clicking on the word 'switch' does exactly that. That's a delightful and clever touch that of course comes from Bartosz Ciechanowski.
/me sees FVWM referred to in the past tense from his FVWM desktop, and scowls
"i'm no ecologist or scientist, but i've read that grasslands can hold water too. just google "do grasslands store water""

Well, I am also not a formal educated ecologist, but I am friends with some (including regular heated discussions) and have had a strong interest in the subject since years.

So yes, grasslands do hold water. But afaik it is a really tiny amount compared to trees. Also just compare how deep the roots of trees reach, compared with grass.
(even though the savannah grass is of course a special breed and way better equipped against droughts than the common gras on a lawn)

"the ecological history of a place tells us where plants thrive and don't thrive. site selection is a fact of plant success."

I agree that it is stupid to ignore that.

But we humans changed so much on the earth already, that the conditions in many places also changed. Winds, rain, temperature, .. including the soil but usually for the worse (acid rain and co, but also fertilizers). This is what I meant with history is gone.

So my point is, I would not not plant a forest, just because 100 years ago, there also wasn't a forest there.

(Also humans have had cattle for a long time and overgrazing is likely the number one reason for desertification or plain grasslands.)

I rather would just look at the current data. How is the soil. PH. Salt level. How much rainfall. What is the temperature, etc.

And then start with the right shrubs and bushes. And then trees.

A forest will grow on its own with the right conditions. We can help with those conditions.
It extends to the edges of the display!
I think the arguments is non-developers don't really need access to it.

You aren't configuring anything or doing anything that needs access to the file system.

You are simply interacting with documents and online systems/applications that you can do the same as on a laptop. Add the greater mobility and the iPad pro really is a better device for most people.

However, as another commenter mentioned, these individuals who SHOULD really benefit from using an iPad primarily also are the group that struggle greatly with the changes to their overall workflow (see Who Moved My Cheese).
It doesn't have much in the way of graphics capability, though, so you need to hang a bloody great external GPU off it.

Without that, they're no better than my elderly Thinkpad that runs off a 25-watt power brick.
> trees will just naturally appear on unused land, there's no need to plant them. If this isn't happening on it's own, it's probably because the conditions there aren't right for them.

That is only true if the seeds can travel to get there! Moving many miles or uphill via seed dispersal is a slow process. The climate gradients and habitat pressures are moving much faster. While I agree that land suitable for forests will eventually reforest itself, if we want to do it on human timescales, we may need to kick-start the process with a seed transfer program.
The United States has indicated that they would intervene, which means the only way to have a chance at a successful amphibious landing would be to conduct preemptive strikes against US bases in the region. To do so would be a direct declaration of war against the US and NATO, which, at current, China cannot hope to win.

I think China is out of there mind here. They either are A. willing to smash Taiwan to rubble and call it a victory or B. completely overestimate their chance of success.

I think China's real hope is that they can threaten their way to an advantageous position and take Taiwan without firing a bullet, but so far no one is blinking and the west is fed up with autocrats threatening warfare to get their way.
The confusion is the point. The trivial number of people involved (19, according to TFA) makes clear that this is not actually a real problem.

The goal is to make people uncertain whether they can vote, and worried about consequences. Even when these cases are dismissed by the court, they will still send the message that you can be arrested, spend time in jail, and forced to spend money on a lawyer if you want to retain your freedom. They will receive no compensation for these arrests, even if found not guilty.

But for the cost of 19 arrests, Desantis has just scared thousands of people out of voting. And that's the real goal.
Show HN: The OS for your physical activity
Steddy is the operating system for your exercise!

Today: A mindblowingly slick to-do list.

5 years from now: The Apple Fitness killer.

Just kidding (but not really). The roadmap goes something like... (1) social layer, follower by (2) video layer.

We'd love to hear what you all think!