skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There was no attempt to engage with the material of the original post, because the original post contains no material, just various claims pulled out of thin air:

> Kanye is a garden variety manic-depressive

> It is likely West has one of the more benign flavors of NPD

> I think his biggest problem is BPD and drug abuse

The rest of the post is either true-sounding-at-first, but completely meaningless claims, or completely obvious things that provide no insight whatsoever.

> NPD patients usually don't suffer

Completely false. Narcissistic injury is extremely painful, and one of the reasons narcissists lash out in the first place.

> [NPD treatment can] correct if not cure the disorder in under 2 years

Also not true. Narcissism is a personality disorder, and "curing" narcissism in 2 years is not common. Everything "can" be done, theoretically, but the implications of the sentence is that Narcissism is somehow special in that regard. It's not.

> but due to the combination with NPD and vast wealth, and probably being surrounded by those that will never deny him his insane impulses, he's probably not going to get help until he bottoms out in clinical major depression for months, if he survives it

So assuming he's NPD, his wealth and sycophants will lead him to destruction? Yeah, quite profound. He also has clinical major depression? Where did that come from?

"Psycho-babble" is a perfectly appropriate description of the original comment.
> It isn't unreasonable to believe that there are other, more specialized tools, that have similar difficulties in manufacturing without the proper equipment and expertise. Some of them are just not common enough to dedicate significant resources to try to build inhouse

In the middle of fighting a war no less, time is a factor.
Yeah that is quite scary. I'd feel much better if I could put a limit on the billing. Just shut everything down if I go beyond X amount of money.
I'm sure others with more experience could chime in, but when my wife gave birth there absolutely was a lactation consultant who did much the same as yours, but was affiliated with the hospital and could be asked to come to the postpartum room or NICU and provide assistance.
It's become pretty clear to me that then solution is to just not have an account.

If you aren't already on a service that's eager about automated bans, don't start now. If you are, keep your head low. Just lurk. Maybe as more and more people lurk, Twitter et al will be incentivized to do something.
"And yet there is no solutions besides yolo-live-with-it."

There is a solution: Stop accounting for dependencies as zero cost. Start accounting for their costs, in their need to be updated, understood, and possibly significant overcompelexity for your needs, plus all these costs are transitive into the dependencies they pull in.

This is not a magic solution. It doesn't mean you just think these magic thoughts and all your problems go away. But if you actually do this, it will solve your problems. It will turn the wide wonderful world of existing libraries back into a benefit instead of so often a net loss.

I still use a lot of libraries, but I've been noticing lately I use more "fundamental" libraries. I use a YAML/JSON parser for my config, but I don't worry so much about all the fancy wrappers around config that try to make it super nice to have environment variables or maybe a config file or maybe map it to the command line or maybe get it from the network... I just use a config file parser and commit to having that. My dependency trees are not completely pristine exactly, but they end up with a lot of these sorts of things in them but not so much all-singing, all-dancing "frameworks" or text templating libraries that are so amazingly helpful that they have entire embedded scripting languages or other such things.
US parties _can_ do that, too (and notably did with Nixon). The refusal to do it with Trump was a moral failing of the Republican leadership, not an inherent systemic limitation.
A cursory glance at the various Wikipedia lists of politicians assassinated in either country rebuts your last point.

US political discourse is vastly more hostile than you give it credit for, as well. Veiled death threats (shooting pictures of opponents, burning in effigy, etc.) are increasingly common, particularly on the conservative side.
> Is that correct?

Basically, yes. But I would add a few points:

> GR is a formula that perfectly matches a dataset of local observations.

More precisely, our best current model of the solar system, which uses GR as its law of gravity, matches our best current dataset of solar system observations.

But similarly, our best current model of the universe, which also uses GR as its law of gravity but is a different model, matches our best current dataset of universe observations--which includes galaxy rotation curves but also includes many other observations.

> they clump randomly like some non-interacting blobs/streams and do not form a general rule. This new dataset is either still too small or has no clear formula describing it at all

I'm not sure what you mean here. Our dataset of universe observations is described by a "clear formula"--our best current model of the universe, which I described above. That model includes "dark matter", i.e., matter that we cannot see, but whose presence is necessary to account for the motion of things that we can see if we use GR as our law of gravity.

MOND proponents criticize the above model because it includes matter that we can't see. But that's not the same as saying the above model doesn't account for observations. It does.
You won't really know how to make wheels without building your own and putting it to actual use nor know when making your own wheels or using existing wheels makes more sense without the experience of both using your own homemade wheels and off the shelf wheels.

After all many wheels on wheelhub nowadays exist because someone got frustrated from their experience with using existing wheels.
Back when I was a youngster, I was at a private school (council was paying for me) which was making a big deal about getting admitted to the Headmasters' Conference because that meant they could now refer to themselves as a public school.

(Although that school isn't currently in the HC, presumably because it was run by Christian Brothers and one of the teachers has since been imprisoned for inappropriate behaviour with children.)
They could if they wanted to. They’re fighting a war and have an immediate need.
https://web.archive.org/web/20221020121743/https://www.reute...
Ya right. This is called hysterical realism.
I agree with you. Furthermore, I think, the interrupt stance doesn't prevent you from attentively listen to what others say. You can absolutely listen a person talking for a long time. The opposite not being true.

However in an educational context like described in the article, if think that waiting for the other to finish is better as it allow a better analysis and criticism of the whole argument development.
You must do this Blender Donut tutorial series. It is a rite of passage and source of bonding with other people, but it is also quite excellent. You may do other things too, but this is where you need to start.
I think that just "suspended" would be more appropriate than "permanently suspended".

Although, it seems that the reality of the situation is closer to "your account is permanently banned unless you manage to raise enough fuss that an actual human looks at it."
Cloud costs are in a bubble
Here's a modern example of a Jig Grinder. https://mooretool.com/jig_grinders.html
So all the names of PMs you mentioned bar one went to Oxford...
'nuclear winter', and the 'end of the world' will not happen with current arsenals. It might have, with the crazy number and size of nukes in the 70s, although even that is highly debatable. But not now.

Even with an all-out exchange, expect Mt. Pinatubo levels of effect. A couple of bad, or even 'missing' summers, perhaps, but nothing like months of darkness, or a decade of winter that older models proclaim.

Not to say we should be any less averse to any kind of nuclear exchange; obviously many millions would die either directly, or from the impact on systems and infrastructure.
Not sure to be honest from a content perspective. I never did any certification and only used parts of AWS and Azure until now. Both have quite good and extensive documentation, but I still needed to invest some time to get everything running. I guess it wouldn't hurt to get some official training, best if you have an employer to pay for it. Some employers like certificates, other don't care. May also depend on your country.

I like the DIY approach too and believe that some things are easier to host yourself. Depends on your use case. These cloud services offer reverse proxies, automatic TLS cert renewals, load balancer, mail servers and of course a lot of bandwidth among other things. If you need to maintain that manually you can end up with quite some work while you can use the cloud provider to basically manage everything aside from updates of your software.

But to really learn it, you also have to do it and also might need to invest a few $ here and there. I did that with the credit card of my employer, which of course helps. Cost transparency is quite low for many services I am afraid.

Requirements in job offers shouldn't discourage you though. Worst case is that you lack the experience and they don't hire you. But I wouldn't chase proficiency here because you read that a lot in job offers. Use the time to perhaps apply to another offer to really determine what they are asking of you.

I think what really helped me to gain insight was to rent my own server and play around with it. The knowledge you gain here will certainly help you to understand any other cloud landscape from any provider. They also come with fixed costs, which is a plus if you want to dabble by yourself.
Right or wrong, it is fair to assume many will cast their vote without doing the reading in such a system. Speaking from a German perspective, I sometimes think how inefficient it is to count 60M votes - just counting 1M votes will give you the exact same result, iff you get the sampling right. What if we could choose a subset of 1% of citizens at random for every election (still far too many to directly bribe), giving them some pride in their responsibility, make sure they have some/better access to the candidates etc.. Again, if the sampling is sound, this won't change the outcome (other than the average voter being more motivated/informed). Of course, I see the problem that people will not feel represented if they, by chance, never get to vote in their whole life ...
did you perhaps mean 1914? i’m not a historian but i DID watch Hamilton a few times and it really seemed like King George had quite a lot of power and authority…
Also, if you look at Scotland, we've had Nicola Sturgeon as First Minister for six years or so now (in which time she's seen four Tory PMs come and go), and she is so popular in the last-but-one Scottish Parliament elections her party got an overall majority, in a voting system designed to prevent any one party getting an overall majority.
My memory could be wrong I think the issues we had were related to KB callback based apis becoming flaky with our in-house service mesh and proxied dynamic ips. Again, that was such a long time ago, k8 was fresh and exotic back then
Why not both? Or even better, why not a more noble third reason, like "people like their children to eat well and see this as an opportunity to make it happen"? Humans are complex and can have more than one motivation for any given action.
Who knows what it was. I feel like that's calling a Ferrari a "grocery getter". I mean it's probably not wrong - people do probably take their Ferraris to pick up milk - but it feels like the author isn't familiar with the subject.
Don't forget "kills the Queen a couple days in".
Wider aisles, more sensible/safe luggage handling, slower and better behaved boarding where backpack could be carried rather than worn. Pretty much everything that's NOT part of the current air travel "system" would help out here. Bigger planes would give more room but smaller profits. Can't have that.
Pretty sure it's already been shown that no structures in the brain are small enough to have quantum effects and the brain is far too hot and noisy for anything useful to happen before decoherence.
If you follow @kamilkazani, he talks about how the fall of the USSR crippled Russia's manufacturing ability; without Western help, it's toast.
Russia today is ironically poised for a communist revolution more so than at any other point in the last 30 years. A centrally planned economy is the only way for a third world nation to industrialize and they need that badly.
Like I said, the analogy is stretched at best. Our universe isn't a black hole.
Ok, so the Moore #3 Grinder was only guaranteed to 2.3 microns, and 0.75 uM in any given inch, after 10 years.

http://vintagemachinery.org/pubs/9432/20263.pdf

To be fair... I did try to find the specific grinder, but it doesn't appear to be listen in any article. Also, I agree that having CNC, and all the other upgrades is nice.

Dan Gelbart says his is accurate to a micron

https://youtu.be/HWPYoE1SNnA?t=61
This is standard in parliamentary democracies; when the PM knows that they're about to be removed, they'll leave. If she hadn't resigned, she'd be going anyway.

Even in non-parliamentary democracies, see Richard Nixon; he made a lot more fuss, of course, but he did, in the end, resign.
Same. I clicked the link and bounced because I wasn't sure which repo to open to get the basics, and wasn't willing to iterate through.
See the response by DiogenesKynikos. The "fitting" is not being done the way you appear to think it is.
"However, open-source companies need to accept that the majority of their big deals and logos come from support contracts, not cloud spending"
"The Thick of It" should be a mandatory watch to understand UK politics.
Apple Fitness+ available to iPhone users in 21 countries starting October 24
I agree, and I didn't mean to imply that it's easy to automate programming, just that it's even harder to automate the creation of test criteria.

Then again, these things don't need to be all-or-nothing. If you consider GitHub Copilot, and where it can be 10 years from now, I would not be surprised if it can double the productivity of most programmers by something closer to pair programming than a code review process.
You seem to assume there is a universal set of manners all people are taught and should adhere to, is that correct?
>NATO is not a threat to the survival of Russia

NATO has become a threat to survival of NATO. And Russia. And everyone.

Think very carefully and tell me how is expanding NATO to the Russian borders in the interests of original NATO members?
https://github.com/DrTimothyAldenDavis/SuiteSparse/blob/mast... it's lgpl or gpl, which is the point of the complaint.

GitHub does a ton of work to formalize license management, it's odd that copilot ignored all of that.
Let's be clear here: there was a left-winger killed for trying to make the country a better place, and a right-winger killed by an ISIS sympathiser (literally no reason to think this MP was targeted for his party)
Never had such issues, you can still do decent coordination in such hand-overs. Honestly the only issue was the inflexibility of the hardware.
"The Queen has more power over British law than we ever thought" [1][2]

[1] - https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/feb/08/queen-...

[2] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26081208
> A cursory glance at the various Wikipedia lists of politicians assassinated in either country rebuts your last point.

Huh?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_Congress...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_British_MPs_killed_in_...

UK 3 in last 30 years, US 2. For a US population of 40x larger, and easier access to guns.
OpenBSD 7.2 Released
Borrowing money to pay for tax cuts for the rich.

Oh sorry, you said good conservatism...
The history of science over the last two hundred years—especially that of eugenics—makes your assertion dubious, at best.
The BBC, at least in the last few years, has definitely been, if not taken over, strongly guided by the Tories (because they hold the purse strings, control over appointments, etc. and are vocal about this whenever the BBC annoy them.)
This is a amazing dose of humility.
@ciechanow.ski

Please please nail that proton
My impression is that British politics are more resentful, but that you don't see it the way you do in the US because the structure of the system is different.

In Britain the PM is chosen by the party in power so you don't get the divided government situations you see in the US where usually the Democrats control some of (1) the Presidency, (2) the Senate, (3) the House of Representatives and the Republicans control others. Considering the veto power of the President and the filibuster rule in the Senate that can be a formula for gridlock.

Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan both represented a move to the right but when Thatcher was in power she had no effective opposition while any legislation that passed in the 1980s was a compromise between Reagan in the US and Tip O'Neill and I think between having a good conservative and a good liberal, we got a lot of good legislation in the 1980s (we got a new Clean Air Act in that time frame, for instance.)

As a result there was a lot of resentment towards Thatcher from Labor advocates who felt completely shut out, so some sang "Ding Dong the Wicked Witch is Dead" when Thatcher died

https://theconversation.com/burying-thatcher-why-celebrating...
> you better have the stamina and political will and skill to push them through and keep at it.

not bankrupting your country also helps.
> Why would you not expect nominal profits to be at all time highs if the purchasing power of the currency goes down?

Purchasing power doesn't magically decrease, it's a function of increasing prices.

Think about for a little. If a companies input costs have increased by 10% their profit will decrease right, maybe not by 10% but it will decrease. So if they increase their prices they can get back to their previous profit level. Instead they have increased prices even more such that their profit is HIGHER than it was before inflation.

QED
The UK is not the continent where the monarch decides who will be sent to shepard the negotiations over the government.
How many times are you going to post the same provably false comment?
Considering the LAST FOUR PMs came from the Conservative party, that's not the epic own you think it is.
> Let's be clear here

No, let's not try to dog-whistle one as acceptable and the other as not. That's exactly the thing I'm talking about.
I do not believe this type of public theft is due to incompetence, I believe it is corruption and grift
The repercussions of the occasional community shitstorm don't seem to warrant any investment into the scalability of support and remediation mechanisms. If this type of stuff would either drive traffic, interaction or another means of revenue generation, we'd probably see more creativity and better results.
You’re right. Ironically my “dumbed down” description was a little too dumbed down itself. I agree though, there are cases where a tablet is actually a better tool too.

I suppose the problem is that they rarely present us with opportunities or necessity to dig deeper, learn more, and become adept at working with and within the operating system.

I could be wrong, too. The truth is I only use an iPad once every couple of weeks for 30 to 90 minutes. My point of view here could be too limited to be accurate, and I’m totally glossing over non-Apple devices.
If you lack the source data you might get them from official feeds. A few years ago I started to collect them: https://github.com/graphhopper/open-traffic-collection
I wonder if this relates to DeepCTRL that came out recently.
I've always wondered if we could force web apps into some sort of "default" offline mode with like some offline://url.here . Very cool of overflow.
> I think the relevant question is, why did a Thatcherite monetary policy collapse overnight in 2022 when it didn't in the early 1980s?

40 years of seeing how they work out?
Totally crazy.
They lie out of their arses. She also tried claiming that revoking a law limiting the bonuses that bankers could get (which was instated after the '08 crash...) would help poor people.
Twitter sees 829,094,400 tweets/day. Wikipedia has 166,666 edits/day. So we're already talking about a factor of nearly 5000x. The number of contributors is also spectacularly different: according to [1] Wikipedia had edits from only 122,821 distinct users in the last 30 days. Twitter claims 237.8 million mDAU (which could be a low or high count, since the "m" stands for monetizable and users may not post.)

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Who_writes_Wikipedia...
I think they do? The UK's electoral system is far from ideal, but it's at least very straightforward. No-one outside of Boris Johnson's constituency saw the name 'Boris Johnson' on their ballot paper, so you'd hope it would be clear to averagely intelligent people that they weren't voting directly for him.
The Arts Commission’s Civic Design Review committee will be responsible for conducting a “multi-phase review” of the project, like it does for all projects on public lands.

Before the project is put out for bid, it will be subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act, according to the Chronicle.

The public toilet will be built by union workers who will “earn a living wage and benefits,” according to a joint statement from Rec and Parks Department and the Department of Public Works, which added that, “While this isn’t the cheapest way to build, it reflects San Francisco’s values.”

Lots of palms greased all the way around.
No, the parent post makes a quite reasonable point that it can't exist, not because of any resource constraint but because there can't be a globally, universally acceptable appropriate moderation standard - different subcommunities have mutually incompatible requirements which can not be satisfied by any common standard; what's clearly acceptable in one place may even be illegal to say in another.

Well, perhaps you can, if you limit the discussion so that you can't discuss borders of countries, existence of certain countries, rights of certain groups, existence of certain groups, self-identity of many of your users, politicians, politics, religion and a bunch of other topics. If you ban all of these and permit just posting what you had for lunch, then perhaps you can make an universal moderation standard - but I would not call it "appropriate moderation" anymore.
> there's no issue

There's no issue as long as you think that "adding in scalar (and possibly vector) terms" is somehow a "simpler" change than "adding a new kind of matter".

But when you look at what "adding in scalar (and possibly vector) terms" actually means in GR, it's the same thing as "adding a new kind of matter". You're just calling the new kind of matter a "scalar field" (and possibly also a "vector field", i.e., two new kinds of matter).

In other words, when you take relativity into account, "MOND" is not an alternative to "dark matter"; it's just one particular way of adding "dark matter".