skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sounds rough... I work and deal with a lot of 20 years olds and I find them quite dry, restrained and conservative to what I was doing at their age. Could be a regional thing?
What about the back BEING the port? With something like the 1-wire protocol it should be possible, only activate it with say a special button combination to save on battery.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1-Wire
The book comparable to the mathematical level of CLRS, in my opinion. Which is either an intro book or very dense depending on a person’s math background.
From an infrequent visitor, EUR49 a month for all public transportation is reasonable. Also I can just buy a digital ticket before coming to Germany and then use it in any cities sound fantastic.
> > no reasonable person

> The standard is would a reasonable person and the answer is absolutely not. Among non techies people assume that Incognito/Private Browsing provides less protection than is actually offered. You go into private browsing when you don’t what sites you visit to show up in your browser history, that’s it.

You quote my referring to what a reasonable person would do, and then seem to be offering a rebuttal by saying that it's about what a reasonable person would do …? Anyway, I think we must just disagree on a reasonable person's expectations.
> Your activity isn’t hidden from websites you visit, your employer or school, or your internet service provider.

I see this disclaimer every time I launch incognito mode. Does it not count?
So in order to survive the colonies would need to be entirely self sustaining, and would only save humanity from an event that wiped out earth but left the colonies unharmed.

Given the huge efforts that would be needed to create such colonies I think the work on spotting potentially dangerous asteroids and working out how to affect their orbits is probably a much better option.
Rolling Stone's 500 Greatest Albums of All Time: Album-by-Album Thread
Any full box in the terminal takes up two full rows top and bottom, and two full columns left and right, this is no different.

It's a clever trick actually, though it doesn't compose the way the traditional box-drawing characters do. Good for one (1) box, where you want to be able to set the background without bleed.
It's mostly India where these hackers operate like real companies with websites, offices, bank accounts, etc...

BellTroX is well known and the Indian government seems to approve of their activities.
I would theoretically posit "maybe".

However in real world, it has been my positively overwhelming experience that "vax skeptic" is anti-vax but clever enough to try to hide it, and take the spiteful stance of "I'm not saying anything, I'm just asking (extremely leading questions with clear strong agenda)".

If true legit "vaccination skeptics" exist who somehow, have not found over abundance of data to make up their mind but still feel they have interesting opinion to share, they are low enough of a percentage to be safe to assume against.

I would put it similarly to "round-earth agnostic". If in 2022 you have not made up your mind yet on whether Earth is round - what are you waiting for? What criteria or info do you feel is outstanding? How are you meaningfully differentiating yourself from flat-earther-in-disguise?

This is not to say that questions should not be asked or that debate is not healthy and necessary and that we should take things on faith. But it's hard to convincingly be vaccination-undecided in 2022 - it feels like it would take large amount of effort and possibly some internal naivette.

Put it in a different way - the default scientific consensus is "vaccines save lives". It's what you're taught in schools and repeatedly told by all reliable medical personnel across governments and countries and continents and religions. It feels like it takes some substantial amount of effort to get yourself into "vaccination skeptic / agnostic" realm, which I would not consider the neutral stance on this topic.

My 100 Croatian lipa :)
‘Zoom picketing’: students protest staff cuts by disrupting online tutorials
> Do you feel the same abuse when you download a desktop application, and it runs code?

Not if the source code is available.
Other reasons for no are that it's not automatic and invisible.

> You are free to revoke your permission for any site to run javascript, but website owners are not obligated to go out of their way to provide their services to you if you choose to do so.

People don't do that enough for it to have much of an effect.
To clarify, by "those" I meant whole nations, not individuals - the latter is a whole other kettle of fish.
Ardour revenue is about US$180k/yr at present. I make a reasonable middle-class income from it, help support another full time developer, and put aside any surplus to help pay other people associated with the project (e.g. website, documentation).
You're comparing entire solutions. That's not what they were talking about. They were talking about individual features.

Also, some sources are more flexible by their very nature and get the flexibility for free.

But more generally, lacking flexibility is a negative by itself. It's an acceptable negative if adding flexibility would cost more than the benefit, but it's still a negative.
Thanks for writing this comment, I had the same initial reaction
It is an extension of Emacs outline mode. Outliners are hierarchical text formats. Org added many useful things to outline mode: keywords, tags, timestamps, footnotes, links, tables...

What makes Org unique is the presence of interpreters, including user-defined ones, that take Org files as input and do things on them.

A famous interpreter is org-agenda which harvests TODO keywords, timestamp deadlines, etc. from different Org files to generate a weekly agenda. Another one is Babel which runs embedded code in Org files, i.e. a literate programming system.

To sum up, Org is a plain text format analogous to Markdown, but with many more features and also interpreters that define certain operations on them.
I keep saying that it's on you if you are getting that paycheck and still lonely in the 21st century, as most IT professionals apparently are. You can literally rent a friend on the internet and bake a bread with them, visit a museum or whatever. The world is your oyster, and you probably don't end up being murdered if you are a straight cis man either. The situation is dicier if you are a woman, and don't even try if you are transgender.
Don't conflate or equivocate the two. I recall reading of an incident were Pinkertons sat in the comfort of sniper nests and shot down picketing miners as fast as they could shoot. The sort of thing you hear about in the most oppressive regimes or during periods of colonial rule.

The Bonus Army. Douglas MacArthur and George S. Patton attacked veterans, their wives, and children with tanks and live ammunition. Similar violence occurred against Occupy Wall Street.

Most people don't remember, or were never taught, that Oklahoma was a bastion of socialist thought and movements until it was obliterated.

Bernie Sanders is a modern day Henry A. Wallace and suffered a similar fate.
It was, why it was I do not know
> Politicians are trying to spin the obvious as a breakthrough that fits their agenda, that's all.

Because it IS a breakthrough. Breaking the barrier between local public transport organizations has been unthinkable for literally decades and may be one of the single greatest achievements of the governing coalition. Painting this as "everyone likes free stuff" is just the same "oh that's socialism" dribble from conservatives all around the world that prevents any progress being made at all.
I didn't want to dig into details like these. Turning it off was the lowest possible effort for me.
If it's what I think it is, it was extremely useful in the mid-1990s, when nothing was encrypted. Today, it's just one of 100 different ways to deliver a browser clientside exploit, and it's far from the most common or effective. But NSA gave it a stupid name, so people think it's important. It is not.
Nice work. I'm working on something similar. Here is an example of Apple analysis on my product: https://decodeinvesting.com/ticker/AAPL. We have a leaderboard of the highest-ranked companies here: https://decodeinvesting.com/leaderboard. This is only the MVP (still in beta).

As others said, a free tier makes sense for your product so that users can test it before they buy. But depends on your operating costs. How do you source the data for the terminal?
Arguably, the phone itself as an object of instant gratification seems more the issue here than the porn being accessed on it. Sure, easily available porn may short circuit some normal sexual interaction, but the phone as an alternative to actual social interaction seems surely the more pervasive problem.

Humans can do just fine without much in the way of sexual interaction, as evidenced by centuries of communities across a variety of cultures that take oaths of celibacy. I'm not so sure the same can be said of large groups of people sharing resources in common without having social skills.
So much of your comment makes me sad. I do hope that in the future you can bear to be in the same carriage as me without feeling fearful.
I’m curious to know why the author chose C++, and what other options if any they might have considered. Is there something here that requires low level high performance, or is it just that’s the language the author knows?

I can see on the website “Our software can simultaneously record and playback thousands of 1080p and 4k cameras per server.” which is part of the answer.
Yeah I don't think PaaS should ever be proprietary in terms of API surface. It's just perverse incentives, you get subsidized until market saturation, and then they jack up the prices. The cloud providers should, imo, compete on uptime, resilience, performance, etc. Kinda like the VPS or VPN providers of today.
As of today, it is still blocked.
> Most people don't know what those words mean, and they shouldn't have to as a prerequisite for using a browser.

How is "not understanding plain English" a valid counter argument? Here are the specific words to which I believe you are referring-

> Your activity isn’t hidden from websites you visit, your employer or school, or your internet service provider.
Show Me the Way
120Hz is definitely more fun, for anything reaction based.
Their data is so good that organizations will definitely pay them just for that, just like they pay for other data vendors without social features too. It's a staple for research quants, but they often won't use it on a daily basis, there might even be just one terminal available for a whole team. How important those clients are for Bloomberg I don't know, but it shows that they have a lot more going for them than just network effects.
Bearick, that guy fron LOTR

Wherick, the inverse of Waldo.

Nareick, always says nope.

Tearick, always rips up newspapers.

Hairick, ironic, guy's bald.

Lairick, dude is a shut in.

Stareick, stop looking at me!

Pairick, it's a chick.

Mareick, this chick is a centaur.

Fairick, redhead.
Nice try. You nearly convinced me to click the link and perhaps read the article.
Hah! I just googled it because I'd seen "avocado toast" referenced enough times I finally got curious where it came from. I didn't realise there was another level to it.

It's funny what gets people riled up sometimes.
Reporters don’t always get to pick and enforce the medium of communication with sources.
I too am in that stage of life. Why, even the other day I wondered "Do those 'bypass all authorization" buttons on the ICBM launch console (@ our hole in North Dakota) actually work?"

To my surprise they do! Fortunately the "Shutdown engines" button also works! But it got me out of my funk.

Well, got to do some cleaning: seems Minuteman-III silo vibrations cause bowel evacuations in most people.
I've road tripped hundreds of thousands of kilometers all around Europe.

The huge difference is that we don't have all the vast empty spaces the Americans do, so it never really ends up feeling the same.
I'd be perfectly satisfied with my corpse getting dissected. I've met the med students who've done that, seen how much it affected them, and heard how they treated the bodies.

I have also seen firsthand the other things that happen to donated corpses -- the pile of skeletonized legs in the corner connecting dust, for example -- and I can safely say I will never ever ever donate my body in this state.
That’s news to me, too. Makes sense though. I assume it’s because you can drag tabs from one window to another. So if you open two incognito windows and drag one windows’ tabs into the other, the browser needs to decide what can be shared. You could keep their states separate, but what if you then you open a new tab in that shared window? What state/profile object is the new tab associated with? Just sharing between all windows is easier to handle.
Jerseys will be the ideal breed.
>Maybe people prefer informality to the Mad Men pretense of charm and authority.

It's crazy that you can take the cultural conventions of respect and formality that have existed around the world and distill it down to "man men pretense". Some might say those cultural conventions have some value, and that's why they existed in the first place. I think people just have so little experience with these things that they totally forgot the purpose. I don't believe civility is out of fashion.
The radio feature is super nice. Thank you for juggling all these API's for us OP. :)
How much is it really costing them? When the satellites fly overhead they either transmits data or not. The cost of operating the satellite is the same. There are data ingress and egress fees with peers. Maybe Elon is feeling a little tight on cash given given the recent spending spree on Twitter. Maybe that cash would have been better deployed to SpaceX give his claims that the company is facing bankruptcy.

https://fortune.com/2021/11/30/elon-musk-spacex-bankruptcy-w...
The editor is client-server using Drb (I'm considering changing the use of Drb; Drb is very easy to get running but you get little control over the interface; it's a bit too good at being transparent)

Originally I did it as a quick way of ensuring I didn't lose data when I started using it, as Drb will forward exceptions as well, so the backend just won't crash, so as long as you don't do anything which corrupts the buffers you're good. Instead the frontend may crash (and throw me into a Pry repl, where I can query the backend and make sure I can recover the buffers), and I can just restart the frontend on the same buffer and keep working. (In practice it mostly crashes when I am using it to edit itself)

As an extra precaution I made it serialise all the open buffers to disk regularly. So I can just shut down my machine and next time I open all the buffers are still there (like Emacs etc. it'll warn me if the file has been edited since the buffer was opened).

Eventually this also gave me multi-frame support "for free" in that splitting the buffer vertically or horizontally just spawns a new instance of the editor and attaches to the same buffer (and then you can open whatever you want in it)
VS Code is an acceptable emacs
Thanks James, I remember Firebase coming to Citrix in Santa Barbara to discuss being aquired. Wonder if you participated in those meetings? So glad they did not buy and ruin you! Ha
A reasonable person would think the word incognito was being used as it's defined in every dictionary. But it's not, hence the lawsuit.
Article title:

"Company Documents Show Meta’s Flagship Metaverse Falling Short"

HN guidelines[0]: "please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
I'd humbly suggest that those two categories being treated the same on HN isn't right given how the latter may or may not be an originating story.

There are a lot of other mechanisms that deal with this stuff though. One is that press releases tend to be disfavoured in general - that takes care of press releases being boring.

The 'you can write your own blog post with your own spin and title' thing - you totally can, and the level playing field then is competing with all other submissions. If the commentary is interesting enough, it will end up on the front page. If it's just content recycling, someone will notice and the URL and title will be replaced with the original by the 'use original sources' rule.

If you follow dang's comments (essentially the public moderation log) you'll see most of these in action pretty quickly, at the price of having to trudge through a bunch of generic dang scoldings about other, more boring things.
> Monocle now has more than 300 dependencies.

That's a lot for C++. I can imagine the giant amount of time consumed by managing those. Glad to hear vcpkg is worthwhile with that many packages.
You just need to look back at Arsenal's (and others') last year's proposal for an European Super League and the massive backlash resulting, which made them not only drop it (for now) but also, hilariously, also agree to pay fines to UEFA for conspiracy to treason or something.

EA dumping FIFA is a good thing to kickstart the mere idea of competition against FIFA's monopoly (and by extension continental bodies), but any actionable outcome is still decades away.
One of the informal definitions of "middle class" that I've heard is "people who have enough wealth and power that they don't have to constantly think about survival, but not enough to have to worry about being a target in the political game of thrones".
I don't know that video, but yes please, hold all companies equally accountable.
I appreciate that they point out the weaknesses of LibrePCB

> So, if you are looking for an intuitive EDA tool to quickly design a simple PCB, you should give LibrePCB a try. But if you want to design complex PCBs, LibrePCB is probably not (yet) the tool you are looking for.
A reasonable person without substantial technical knowledge could have mistaken beliefs about lots of Internet concepts, and I don’t think it’s reasonable to expect that a browser UI needs teach all of them. Should the cache settings have a big banner warning you to disable caching entirely or accept that a clever website operator can extract certain information about your browsing history?
Great submission. I love evolutionary hacks that solve problems with physical structure rather than chemicals. While trees do have a complex immune system, this probably does more for contagion.

Social distancing for trees!
Why do you need an emoji for the letter ‘B’?
Build your AI Product MVP in less than 24 hours
https://archive.ph/SCdzV
> "users of the Internet enable ‘private browsing mode’ for the purpose of preventing others ... from finding out what the users are viewing on the Internet."

OK but Chrome explicitly states that it only protects against other users on the device seeing your history. It also clearly states that other entities may be able to see the history. So if you thought the purpose was "preventing others" in a general sense, that's on you.

They state that Google attempts to collect information on you even when in Private Browsing. Yes, no shit, all websites will work exactly the same way via Private Browsing. All tracking techniques will work exactly the same way. To not do this would mean that a browser would have to tell websites "I'm in private browsing mode", which would be a terrible idea and is just a shittier version of Do Not Track.

OK, so then they talk about "Duplicate GET Requests".

> Plaintiffs allege that Google collects duplicate GET requests.

> ccordingly, when Google obtains a duplicate GET request, the duplicate GET request "enables Google to learn exactly what content the user's browsing software was asking the website to display."

I have no idea what they're referring to. The closest thing I can think of is Safe Browsing, maybe that new off-by-default advanced safebrowsing thing?

Oh, ok, reading on they're... just talking about tracking that websites do. So if Google's JS is loaded into a webpage it apparently will send dupes of GET requests. I'd like a source but they only talk about how Facebook does this...

> Second, Plaintiffs allege that Google collects the IP address of the user's connection to the Internet, which is unique to the user's device.

Yes, websites can see your IP address... also websites have been explicitly called out in the private browsing page as still being able to track you.

>
In addition, Plaintiffs allege that, for users using Chrome without Incognito Mode, Chrome constantly transmits "a unique digital string of characters called Google's ‘X-Client-Data Header,’ such that Google uniquely identifies the device and user thereafter." Id. ¶ 95. However, Plaintiffs allege that the X-Client Data Header is not present when a Chrome user has enabled Incognito Mode. Id. ¶ 96. Accordingly, Plaintiffs allege that Google is able to tell when a Chrome user has enabled Incognito Mode. Id.

Yes, this is an example of Google not sending data to Google during private browsing.

I dislike this header, personally. I believe that Google should remove `doubleclick` from one of the sites that it will be sent to, but I don't think it's relevant to this case. It is so far the most relevant thing though.

I also believe Google should not send the tracker to "youtubekids.com" and that may actually be illegal in the EU, possibly even the US.

And that's it. So, most of this is absolute nonsense, and there is one issue that I think Google should address but it's not related to the misrepresentation of Private Browsing at all.
I mean, I certainly wouldn't expect/want Microsoft to have a copy of everything I've ever typed into a Word document or Excel spreadsheet.
The title is 'adults' though, not 'old people'. Those in their 30s are definitely adults.

To me it's clear that even 'young people' as used throughout the article is intended as euphemism for 'children' (i.e. non-adults) that's perceived to be less condescending. (Perhaps the author cares too much what children think!)
I find it strange that this article presumes that you have all the right answers and that there isn't the possibility that you are the one who needs their mind changed. It points out that listening is valuable, but not because there's a possibility that the person you're talking to is in the right, no, you should listen to other people because studies show that listening to other people will manipulate them into seeing things your way.
I feel like if you really wanted to live in a world of open-minded people, you should probably start by being open-minded yourself.

Here's a good trick I picked up for discussing contentious things - if you're ever tempted to dish out a sick burn, try to rephrase the point into a genuine question. Then the other person will have to walk through the logic of it, and if it turns out there is a real logic to their side of things, you don't get your ego bruised, cause you just asked a genuine question.