skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Believe it or not, people in the Deaf community have senses of humor, and like sex. I'm sure those two things can go together at times.

See joke 7, page 22, for an example similar to gp's: https://works.swarthmore.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=109...
The headline of a story about moral indignation is full of moral indignation.
I wonder how decentralized this could be. As described, it seems like there may be a decentralized version of this and that was unexpected (for me at least)
I'd say other countries should take note. But privatization of infrastructure assets is a lie that has been sold to millions across the world
A reality where the alternatives are far worse.

No, the others can't "continue as they have been" if things change.

Most of those countries "not causing a problem" accept a great deal of food and fuel imports from the "over-contributors", never mind goods, services and financing. They literally cannot support their populations without these imports. If the global economy comes screeching to a halt as major players scale down and just see to their own needs, many of the minor players literally starve in the dark. Just look at the impact of the Ukraine/Russia wheat supply disruption on North Africa/The middle east for a tiny example of what a global disruption would look like.

The current model can be made sustainable with time, proper policy and technological advancement. If for whatever reason we can't manage that, we're screwed.

People say "growth can't continue to infinity", and technically they're right. Problem is we know what no economic growth looks like. It's some form of feudalism, where powerful entities hoard all the wealth and we all rent the rest. The only attempt at something other than that was 20th century communism, and that... didn't work to say the least. So either we make history by creating the first ever successful re-distributive economic system, on a global scale, or we keep doing what we've been doing for centuries and hope technology and enlightened democracy can save the day.

My vote's on the latter, at least it has an overall positive track record.
350MW / 91000 homes = 3.8kW / home (24/7), which seems very very high.
Yes, a youtuber who goes by ‘I’m a mac’ made a great (at least I thought) series of videos breaking down how this generations of die sizes compare to previous generations:
(The first where he starts comparing generations with graphs) https://youtu.be/9_bqwEy5AQ4

Though I have to wonder, do we want bigger 40 gen dies? The 4090 already guzzles at 400w at full tilt, and gets ar least 200+ fps at pretty much all games except maybe cyberpunk, and can complete video editing workloads at twice the speed of the 3090.

Do we need an even bigger lovelace chip?
> You really believe that it’s because of a single rep? Then you also might also believe that most management disasters are “programming errors” like that sometimes say?

It's uncanny how all of the world's problems are either caused by lower-end employees or acts of god.

The higher the position, the more infallible they are.

That must be why higher-uos are paid the most: they are physically unable to do no wrong.
US DoJ claimed jurisdiction over all of Ethereum due to significant concentration of nodes within the US. So, according to them.
I suspect the difference between you and those being sanctimonious to you are that they lie about their indiscretions. They probably have cars or pets or don't live in dense residential areas.
Dexedrine
Hahaha “free h4x0r servers with no logs” hahaha

That’s exactly a thing the FBI would say.

They should name the service “honeypot.com”.
30+ millennia is a long time to be stuck in a rut*. What changed that turned us from stone knives and bear skins into modern technologists, and when? Was it writing? Metals? Food?

*If they answer is “the wheel” then I will appreciate the irony of the phrase “stuck in a [wheel] rut”!
There is no question being asked here, this is an absolute shitpost
There is no such thing as a stable country on the time scale required for nuclear energy safety. That requires decades. Humanity cannot provide that.

Enerhodar is not the only example. World war two ended roughly 77 year ago. The US civil war was less than 160 years ago.
We all know that the number of AR-15 your credit card company lets you buy is the only proper way to count ‘freedom points’ (TM).

Crippling debt from education so that you have some shot at a career, or a health insurance system that has successfully abolished any market mechanisms and effectively ties you to your employers certainly don’t contribute to any ‘mass control’ whatsoever.
Seems pretty obvious at least since Dot Com legal problems started, no?
Do you have any idea of the quantity of radionuclides released from Fukushima and their half lives? Just a couple of kilometres off the coast of Japan their activity is well below (multiple orders of magnitude) the natural background level. The sea is naturally full of radioactive potassium and uranium, amongst a lot of others.
I just emailed Gusto to find out if they are sharing data with Equifax. I did not see a way to opt out in the employer or employee interface.
I think if Chinese people were to throw off their slave shackles and liberalize, then Chinese hegemony would be permissible/possible. I don't see any reason that's not possible, Taiwan is exactly an example of an ethnically Chinese society doing just that.

America was ceding power to China through making it's supply chain vulnerable. If it were not for Xi's disastrous reign, that likely would have continued. America was losing, China snatched defeat from the jaws of victory.

Another fallacy is that there is a strategy to out-compete via producing more. Russian and Chinese strategy is to corrupt and destroy institutions such that the west produces less and becomes another low trust society. Given recent political happenings, I would say this is an effective strategy that is showing both success and results.

It's not hard to imagine an America where every single American is paying rent to a Chinese landlord. That is winning a war without firing a single gun.

Military might is only one form of power. Economic and social power are not null.
Thank you for sharing those, esp. the one about Lyngbya majuscula blooms.
But now they have this bin of chips designated as the low tier 4080 that they previously said was worth, what 1000 dollars? Do they call it a 4070 and just instantly sell it for 600 dollars? Really showsbus that the value behind their cards are whatever Jensen and friends want it to be, actual costs be damned.
We should add a 400 level error for Paywalls
why use coc when native lsp is supported. lspconfig plugin is pretty straightforward to setup.
This is actually why I'm buying an ICE truck rather than an EV. We need fossil fuels for so much, including fertilizer. It feels irresponsible to buy an electric.
The original copy referencing 230 filmmakers appears in the NY Times in September.
echo "Fuck vim" > /etc/motd
Ways to make aviation fuel green
Those are figures I've heard second hand on a real project from some people I trust. My understanding is that a lot of optimizations become more complicated that way. I could be wrong though.
There's a huge difference between fitting a probabilistic model to a data distribution then sampling from it (what GPT-3 is) and agents that invent language and use it to communicate.
Agreed, I am not sure I understand the "how can you expect this to be secure" argument. I paid nothing, and it's sometimes fun to have a thing to play with that someone created. I am not using this to proxy a hack into Bank of America, nor am I storing my 20 page manifesto.

If you do such a thing through here, you deserve whatever happens to you.
A new design process for buildings
Explain to me how this is a bigger risk than just physical burglary and stealing a computer with encrypted drives? The effort required to MITM and take advantage of this exploit is considerably more costly and time-consuming than just breaking into a building.

AS OP mentioned, this is not about assumptions but laws and their interpretation during consideration in a court of law.
> That being said ‘the more words you know, the more things you can say’ as my old English teacher used to say.

Sure, you can say more things. That's great, if your goal is to talk a lot without caring if anyone else around you is listening to what you're saying.
Makes me wonder how many states there are in a neuron.

Like, they are similar to transistors but have more states than off (0) and on (1).
By definition it can't be, but neither can the general theory of relativity.
Anti money laundering is a global system with widespread coordination and cooperation between countries, spearheaded and supported by the UN and most UN member states.[1]

The OFAC action against tornadocash and users of tornadocash was a direct response to the use of Tornadocash to launder funds to do with North Korea.[2] You can agree or disagree with this, but the US and OFAC have consistently claimed the right (as most countries do) to intervene to enforce sanctions. They do this in conventional financial transactions, so it doesn't seem out of the ordinary at all that they should do so in crypto transactions especially given that North Korea has been active in using crypto to facilitate sanctions busting (eg [3]).

The fact that the flashbots crowd have decided to use the ofac list as part of compiling blocks in their relay and their relay has become the most popular shows that for the most part validators don't really care that much about enforcing the ability of people who use tornadocash to transact conveniently on the ethereum network. I expect this will reach an equilibrium where tornado users will have to pay to use certain relays that then have to pay more MEV (essentially bribing the validator) to get their blocks confirmed.

[1] https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/money-laundering/global-progr...
[2] https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0916
[3] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-61090064
It doesn't seem obvious to me that we should happily censor a film because the subjects of the film don't like it.

Suppose we did a film about the Sackler family https://www.hulu.com/series/the-crime-of-the-century-63a06ef... and the Sackler family says they don't like it -- they feel they were misrepresented, and claim they didn't consent to participation, despite having signed consent documents. Is that legitimate grounds to censor the film?

Some may feel that the Sackler situation is different. You might see the Sackler family as known "oppressors" and "bad guys". And you might see Guantánamo detainees as "victims of oppression" -- perhaps you even think they're "good guys".

I don't think this argument works -- it is exactly through documentaries such as this that we can form accurate opinions about who is a "good guy" or "bad guy"; who is the "oppressor" vs "victim of oppression". If we allow anyone claiming to be a "victim of oppression" to censor stuff that makes them look bad, that just serves to lock in our current views regarding who is a "victim of oppression" -- which means we won't be able to update those views as more evidence comes in, or as circumstances on the ground change.

If someone doesn't like a documentary that was made about them, they can do a point-by-point refutation. Censorship doesn't seem like a good solution.
To get an overview of these (toxic IMHO) companies, I strongly recommend this episode of Last Week Tonight:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wqn3gR1WTcA
People's actions do not need to be violent in order for the governments to respond with violence. Disobedience is enough. You know it very well. This is just how it works.
I'm diagnosed with ADHD, I self-describe it as a mental retardation. Mentally ill seems accurate, too. I don't have a learning disability, per se, whereas most forms of mental retardation involve a learning disability. Perhaps that's why people aren't so fast to call ADHD a mental illness or mental retardation.
Lessons learned working decades with Graphical DSLs
Ignoring the metaverse stuff, meta’s foray into augmented reality for professionals is something I’m really looking forward to. 1500 USD is pretty steep for a vr headset aimed at gamers, but it’s pretty much the equivalent of two good 4k monitors. Battery life of the head set could be a bit better but not that much of an issue as you can use a cable. Not sure about the battery life of the controllers as they are supposed to last about the same, so you’ll have to keep them on the dock whenever not using them.
Edit:

I should have said they will not insure fully for the consequences of the disaster, in particular not long term effects. Nuclear has limited liability and does not need to cover the full cost of a disaster.

https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/safety-and-sec...
Is there any metal album that you can play backward and it says "Praise Jesus, my lord and savior!" I wonder what the Christian groups would do with that?
It's wasn't that I thought I was misdiagnosed, I agreed with the diagnosis, it's that I felt mistreated. I remember coming into that office that day and thinking "I'll make sure I won't get diagnosed with something else" because a fair amount of my past abuse was a result of institutional discrimination caused by school policies that mandated certain treatment of certain children with labels to the point of stupidity regardless of the child's consent or protests. The issue was, I had the same label as what had previously typically been a more severe disability, and thus was treated as mentally incompetent by policy.

I didn't want to be diagnosed, I didn't want the treatment (And it never did end up helping), and none of this actually got to the root of my problems. I ran an experiment soon after diagnosis. I gummed my medication one week, and told the teacher I took it, and asked them how I thought I was doing. They thought I was doing great! I then took it, and said I stopped taking it due to side effects. They said I was really struggling. I stopped taking the drug after that, and got an angry response in return, as now that I was diagnosed, I had a moral obligation to treat myself. Do recall I was a recent victim of severe abuse when I say all this.

I got another label later, I took one psychiatric medication, I reacted to it badly right away and called the doctor to report this in 2 days, something I virtually never do. He just told me to tough it out for a month to see if it worked. It was a month of hell I felt I was morally obliged to go through to "Get better" because as my doctor says, the evidence says I have to give it time.

My issue isn't being misdiagnosed, it's being correctly diagnosed and the prescribed approaches not working. I've grown to see these labels as just packages of prejudices and I've had quite a bit of distaste for. I wish I could just be misdiagnosed, but it was only two years ago a coworker approached me and confided in how they had ADHD and thought I did too, so I don't have any ability to truly convince people I don't have these labels anyways. So long as this system is useful for other peoples purposes, my opinion and my experiences don't matter.

You know what my username is a reference too? It's a reference to folklore about stolen children. At first children would appear normal, but when the faeries "stole" the child in early childhood, they would start exhibiting bizarre traits like obsessively counting seeds, jumping and dancing about, and unusual intelligence for their age. The people of the time figured these children must not really be human, but changelings, replaced by faeries. Martin Luther of protestant fame figured they were children replaced by satan who could only be cured through murder. So that's what my username is, a reference to a label for children who acted differently which justified their murder.
US likely didn't have the leverage. US couldn't convince other CHIP4 partners (TW/SKR/JP) to seppuku their semi industry by losing ~1/3 of revenue from cutting off PRC, especially with coming semi crash. Ergo US had to do these unilateral export controls trying to coerce everyone to cooperate, but as long as East Asia makes 90%+ of chips that US high tech depends on, other actors have some leverage to push back, because they don't want to cripple their own semi industry.

Samsung also got 1-year waiver. I'd expect more companies to get waivers going forward once lawyers/lobbyist look at the spreadsheet. Also expect non US companies to de-americanize US origin tech from equipment to get piece of 400B PRC semi pie. And good chance those TSMC/Samsung fabs in Arizona will likely be delayed / dragged out to negotiate future waivers. And a bunch of layoffs in western semi from companies that's going to lose ~1/3 revenue which will impact R&D (which may make it easier for PRC to close parity). Ontop of the US / green card / residents working in PRC semi that just became unemployed. Maybe it's worth it, but plenty ways this could backfire. One thing is for sure, going forward, every node PRC closes in, they're going to absolutely crank up industrial policy to cut into US margins and try to cripple US semi in retaliation.
If you merely want to internalize the vi movement keys, play a round of hunt (part of the bsdgames package on Linux systems) with some friends or colleagues on your local network.

Vscode also has vim keybindings available.
Next employer I will just tell them I only own a nokia 6810 or something haha
The National Review is one of the publications I respect most. It's rare to see someone criticize their own side.
Close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.
Genshin still works and AIUI they haven't updated the driver, meaning Microsoft isn't taking this seriously enough.
> As a hypothetical, you’re arguing that society should have more sympathy for your wife’s family than GP’s partner’s family?

No, I'm arguing that taking away from the general public to provide for a subset of people requires that the subset boundaries be well justified. Good examples are "people who are poor", and "people who are sick". A bad example would be "people who owe money on their house in 2022". Do those people benefit from debt forgiveness? Of course! And I'm sure they'd be very grateful for it. Meanwhile, people who decided to rent in 2022 or pay their house off in 2021 are footing the bill, for no discernible reason.

> How exactly are we supposed to litigate a “wife’s family vs other wife/husband’s family” debate in these terms? Did the people working low-wage jobs spend time on food stamps? Section 8? Subsidized phone service?

Those are just benefits for poor people. Those are good, and though some of them could stand to be "ramped" better, they're generally the right idea. Again, the problem is selecting a highly arbitrary subset of people while excluding their peers who differ only in the decisions they made (to take out a loan or not, to pay off a loan quickly or not). The boundaries don't even bother selecting for people in real need. 125k/250k household income? Contemplate those numbers for a minute. So you went to college and you have a world-class job in the 90th percentile of the USA and you're getting money from the government to give you that boost you need so you can, what, remodel your home theater a year sooner than you planned?

> If the answer is no, do you think that people working low-income jobs do not, on average, take advantage of public money in any way?

People with no degrees driving our food to us and our garbage away can take public money, yes. Being against any form of wealth redistribution is light-years away from being against this one particular redistribution.
Yes, sadly this is more true than ever. America is all about due process and socialism for the rich and powerful, and plea bargains and rugged capitalism for the poor and unfortunate.

We have no right to preach rule of law (which more than anything means consequences for billionaires and politicians), when we don't practice it at home.

I suppose the best the argument can get is that many governments would be much worse police at least for the time being.

I think Europe does have the capacity (but maybe not the will) to check America's power.
It doesn't in any way solve the increasing electricity need in the future though, even assuming it would be fast and cheap to fix (it's not).

That said, the coalition also wants to improve the transmission lines.
Wouldn’t a decentralized and uncontrolled endorsement layer eventually just get gamed the same way the news layer does? At some point you AJ e to decide who to trust, wether they’re endorsers, reporters, or trolls.

I have seen zero evidence that people will change their beleifs when presented with evidence.
incredible as it may seem to say, data security is a secondary concern vs the very concept of these businesses, which exercise enormous and often malign influence over the lives of citizens. Take together, the are in effect a privatised 'social credit' system which can stop you from getting a home, a car, a job, any kind of insurance, effectively cutting you off from healthcare and the rest. They are instruments of oppression, their private status providing US Gov moral cover and the permission to still claim 'land of the free'
No idea if it still exists, but there used to be a plugin/extension called WOT (web of trust) that crowdsourced ratings on sites from its users for display to future visitors. This is less a layer and more AR, but I guess this is a similar idea. Any decentralized effort is still going to have federation keys.
>"The proposal imagines the endorsement layer would not rely on a single sensor or information source, but instead offer users the chance to add data to the endorsement layer. The result would theoretically be "an endorsement graph with a data structure expressing the connection between additional information linked to the data."

This is essentially the semantic web, no? I've always liked the idea but the problem is still trust at the end of the day. You can look to metadata to see whether your actual data is trustworthy or not, but then you'll have to trust that your metadata is correct, and if you do it as the article hints at crowdsourced, that's a tough sell in particular for real-time events.
they can't even deliver truck announced 3 years ago and semi announced 5 years ago, this company is a joke, can't believe people buying into the hype, pretty much everything they made is failure besides SpaceX, which ain't really Tesla anyway

even their regular EVs sell no volume at all and are already being destroyed by traditional brands