skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Is this something akin to that checkbox on your tax return indicating you want to donate $3 to the Presidential Election Campaign fund? I think the main difference is that it would be an extra amount you'd pay, rather than having the government allocate that $3 from the total amount that was going to the treasury.

https://www.fec.gov/introduction-campaign-finance/understand...
The Atlantic:

> Students need more exposure

Also The Atlantic:

> Paywall
I watched a documentary about Rachel Dolezal and obviously documentaries have an perspective of their own, but her story didn't seem to be a simple one of narcissism. She seemed genuine in her beliefs.
You're right. Maybe there is a conspiracy to plant child actors at his house to sexualize his children.
“The fact that some people are visual thinkers while others are auditory”

I thought the “visual learner” classification was a myth.
Ah I had forgotten about the update to that. Last I remembered they were suing him. I only have Ubiq equipment.
Nope. California, but yes it was Haggen. Thanks for reminding me of the name, I had forgotten it! I remember going there once and being gobsmacked at how expensive the place was. Like they were trying to charge Whole Foods prices for a regular grocery store.

> Trying to take over 5X times as many stores as you were running before is a huge operational challenge.

It reminded me of Frontier (tiny little telco) buying up a huge chunk of Verizon's wireline business in 2009. They still run it, but it's been rough.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frontier_Communications#Purcha...
I think that more than the reconstruction there probably isn't any will to pay for operations or maintenance anymore (after all, this probably wouldn't have happened in the first place if maintenance was better). So even if any billionaires decided to foot the bill, the issue would remain that a long term commitment to supporting the facility is also needed, and while short term large expenditures are tolerable to most rich companies and individuals, the long term commitment with no clear end or outcome is probably the limiter.
Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF) [pdf]
Okay I'm going to try and engage in a good faith reply here:

"Free speech absolutist" does not mean "absolute free speech", you're misunderstanding the premise here. The term does not mean that anyone should be allowed to say anything they want at any time.

The phrase means that we should permit any LEGAL speech. Where "legal" has tons of historical precedent and can be decided by the country.

We've seen time and again, that if the ability to speak freely isn't a priority, then censorship grows quickly. If you don't believe that there is a ton of censorship happening on these platforms with a specific set of biases (the biases that the employees of these companies carry) then I would say that you might not be viewing the situation with an open mind.

This is becoming a problem because the Internet has become the new town square where people learn what's going on in the world and talk with each other. If the people running these platforms are allowed to suppress speech that they don't like and promote speech that they do like, then they wield an incredible amount of power. This power is rife for abuse, both by people inside the corporation and within government.

You are correct though that 4chan is a gross cesspool, though its one I believe should be allowed to exist simply because I believe freedom of speech is important. The problem with that site is obviously that it's anonymous. Coupling anonymity with free speech is a recipe for bringing out the worst in people, but a system where peoples' identities are out in the open and where they can speak freely is good in my opinion. We need more free speech and we need to engage with our fellow countrymen and find common cause, otherwise this insanely polarized partisan situation will continue to get worse.
Then it's not free speech. The whole point is that there are not restrictions. If it's restricted, it is by definition not free.

"Free speech" is a cool buzzword people think they can qualify for (or wish to), without the ramifications of true free speech (hurt feelings, bad ideologies being discussed in a positive light).
As someone who lived there for a long time, Canada is the most mediocre and overrated developed country of the lot.
True... up to a point. I'm not a fan of the parent so this isn't a defense of the idea but saying "income taxes" is a bit of a cheat. Taxes are taxes. So, what percent of of households pay taxes? If you look at not just income but sales taxes, sin taxes,payroll taxes and pass-through taxes I'd bet the answer is 100% or close to it. And it's probably more then $1 a week.

That said, the idea of adding an optional poll tax lottery seems dopey.
> the complexity of Glib and GObject makes OP’s API quite a bit nicer to use

Yeah, Glib and GObject are a massive PITA, thankfully both have C++ bindings and can be used from Vala, so it's not that bad in practice. The C API is a nightmare though.
The Hottest App? One Where Teens Have to Say Nice Things About Each Other
It was so much better than I imagined it would be!
For good reason. Invoking power of attorney solves no fundamental problems and just creates a ton of other problems.

It should only be done in the most extreme of cases (ie: someone turns into a literal vegetable on life support). If someone still has a degree of agency and capabilities... even if they're delusional and/or mentally ill, they still deserve to live their life. IE: Control their own bank accounts and whatnot.
To those who espouse the idea that comments should be filtered for the greater good, I say 'You first.'

There was a time period when the left was for free speech and the right was wanting to constrain it. Maybe its just a giant pendulum - there is no right/left difference when it comes to free speech - everyone wants to censor / filter the speech of the opposite side.

If things come in cycles, then I expect the right to take over more and more (see the european shift) and then for them to slowly become in favor of censorship. Maybe then - if we are lucky - the left will remember that censorship is always the enemy even if it helps them currently.
I have a bachelors degree in electrical engineering and work experience in hardware design and in the back of my mind I've always known this to be true, but this is the first time in my life I've ever heard anyone say this explicitly. EE pedagogy is badly broken in places.
It is typical. Here is a recent illustration of one from a blue check that attracted a lot of attention but was not removed.

https://twitter.com/TalbertSwan/status/1581103527585120257
On the web site it says that they are a non profit association (e.V.)
Consider that some of the C23 changes have in fact cleared up ambiguities and removed support for ancient hardware. So I find that the renewed pushes behind the standard are not all promises of eventual disintegration. There are a few accomplished and considerate people in WG14. If you visit the page I linked above you'll get a sense of that.

I never particularly cared about ISAs - when I think about the "simplicity" and "closeness to hardware" I mean the control over data layout and control flow. Data layout and architecture of the global data flow is often the key to 90-100% of the performance gains you can expect; and more or less stable binary interfaces mean interopability and modularity, minimizing ecosystems lock-in. Where you need to use a certain instruction is the rare case, and you are recommended to code it in assembly or using compiler extensions.
Is Elon Musk being scammed by Twitter?

Same situation.

Can't a rich dude buy a company without goofy rumors being spread (scammed into buying Parler)?

Having a celebrity owner increases the value.
That has certainly been a recent trend here! I wonder why that is. As an educator, I can offer my own hunches:

- The COVID pandemic forced students' and teachers' experiences into the open; schools still haven't returned to "normal" since 2020

- Folks here are trying to grapple with the roles technology can play in learning and in our education system

- Software engineering and related fields require a decent education; perhaps folks are worried about who may be prepared or under-prepared for the field in the future
It's considered a robot by its manufacturer (https://news.northropgrumman.com/news/releases/northrop-grum...), the police who own it, and California state law, so I am confident in my choice of terms here.
Public Git Hosting Sites
> Chinese truffles (Tuber indicum), that is, a close relative of the French black truffle (Tuber melanosporum) [...] even ripe Chinese truffles are not wonderful [...] Although it doesn’t have the same powerful aroma or strong flavor, it’s a close approximation.

AKA, a cheap Chinese knock-off.
One difference between the "construction trades" and a "victim group" is that the first is setup around something else (working construction, working on a job) and the second is setup around a particular aspect (victim of X).

In the first group, you're often better assuming "default open" (that everyone in the group is a non-narcissist) - in the second group you may need defenders to protect the members (or somehow combine the two types).
It was a lot harder to make those public remarks when Brittney was at her lowest publicly than it is for Kanye right now.

I'm not saying Brittney would have, just saying that it's easier to have a very public manic episode where your every thought is aired than it was 15 years ago.
It’s very easy to be minimalistic when you’re doing very little.
Every UTXO is also randomized as far as input selection and distribution and also the way they're labeled as they travel through the system. For the simplest example, reference early monero code (at the time BMR, and MRO) where Borromean Ring Signatures were used, where the same operation is performed multiple times per-input effectively mixing inputs at the atomic level, rather than in later iterations (RingCT, Arcturus, etc) that extended this further to obscure also the amounts of these inputs and to trim some of the inefficiencies of Borosigs.
Is it just me, or does every single AI innovation lately seem to be.. pointless?

Like, if I had the time and resources to work in AI, stuff like substituting faces and even stable diffusion would be about the last things I would ever work on.

What would I start with? Something more like the MS Office software of the 1980s, only automated. I would have real-world applications that, wait for it, perform work so I don't have to. AKA automation.

TBH this stuff exhausts me to such a degree that I almost can't even follow it anymore. It's like living in a bizarro reality where nothing works anymore. A waking nightmare. A hellscape. Am I the only one who feels this way?
More Proof That This Is the End of History
They have these tests and education in US too. Dust and snow can make those sensors faulty so you should still do the 'look over your shoulder'.
That's why I said "except if your SLA requires it." If you've agreed--with other teams, with outside clients, or just as a project goal--that your service should work on 99.9% of calls, and you find in practice that you need to retry S3 calls to meet that target, then adding retries is reasonable.

If the problem is just that the 99 calls could overload downstream services on retries, the ideal solution is to add rate-limiting, though admittedly that is an imprecise science.
> "Rising against adversity" is not the story I'd be be using here so much as just a typical strongman bravado leading to an absolute disconnect from reality.

It's not really a story of rising against adversity though. It's that people who have a lot of success doing something have trouble turning around and doing the opposite. There seems to be a human tendency to double down on what people think got them their success.
Same here. The notion of "free speech" was one of the most successful and liberating memes (in the original sense of the word) in human history. But with the advent of technology, overflow attacks on free speech make unrestricted speech as useless as no speech.

It's like living in darkness, and then someone invents light, and everyone cries "more light", and it's great, and then after a while the light gets so bright that it's blinding, making the light useless for its original purpose of letting you see things, and yet we still cry "more light" because we're afraid of going back to the darkness.

I don't know what new thing to replace the rallying cry if "free speech" with. Something about signal-to-noise ratio, but all the alternatives involve trusting people to moderate, which is obviously an undesirable property compared to the original concept, but I think it might be simply unavoidable. At a high enough level, free speech itself can be used to eliminate free speech.
i would have serious concerns about hosting in europe due to hate speech laws that are muddy and ripe for abuse. the site doesn't have a hate speech policy i can find, is anyone here informed on exactly what the ramifications of such laws might be?
Or to put it in other terms, you want to consume memory at a rate lower than propellant.
he is a victim of his own choices... I don't want to sound callous, but to be honest, we all face a much more harsh and unforgiving future than him if we made the same mistakes. He has squandered the good faith he built over many years by making bad decisions. Somehow he generated wealth out of it all, but continued to make bad decisions in hopes of hanging on to his dramatic public personality/popularity. It's not for me to judge of course, but it's a vital lesson to us all in the age of Internet fame, integrity and reputation matter... The more we forgive and cast a blind eye to people that "sell out" based those principles, the more we end up forgetting exactly why morality, good conduct, and positive reputations matter in life.
Isn't this where you put a stop to existing requests and implement free API keys?
I immediately scroll down to a picture/video. If you don't show me something I am gone. The Linear home page is incredible in my eyes. Just as a visually impaired user might not like pictures, a dyslexic person might not like text. Just another perspective for ya.
I encourage you to look up the word "exigency"
Why does it have to be one or the other?

The point of the article is that it should not be one or the other, different students need different things.

It is the removal of tracking, the removal of vocational education, the denial of differences in students and the insistence in homogenized education that is wrecking schools.

If only 37 percent of 12th graders can do the math needed to start college, maybe only 37 percent of 12 graders should be going into debt for a college education.
Is it this poll? [1]

[1] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33223222
It is.

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/04/the-myth...
It's really the "more advanced" way to do it. There are a lot of people, myself included, that are actually much better at thinking in abstractions - I suspect the author might be the same, despite her thinking of over-abstraction as a barrier.
This is a weird take. Most folks are old enough to remember the pre trump-era internet and society where alternating views were allowed and engaged with as opposed to leading to bans and social cancellation. Conflating that with allowing people to shove views in your face is odd, your ability to tune out is distinctly different from one’s ability to broadcast.
> Killing mozzies to rid us of their pathogens is worse than attacking the pathogens themselves, because: 1) let's not kill these little lives unnecessarily and 2) we risk upsetting the ecosystem that we can neither understand nor repair if we damage it.

1) Mosquitoes carry more than just malaria, and trying to cure them of every pathogen is a crazy game of whack-a-mole. Even disease-free they are a major pest.

2) Research has been performed to determine if mosquitoes are a keystone species and has found that they are not.

We have the tools at our disposal to eliminate the species that has killed more people than all the wars in human history combined. It's mind-boggling to me that anyone would hem and haw about the consequences of this non-keystone species when plenty of other species are driven to extinction every year without any fanfare.
For the US, any relocation expenses are not tax deductible for the employee, period. I think there's some tax deductions you get as a business, but for the employee any money spent on the employee for relocation is considered taxable without exception.
I doubt states would be concerned about taxing relocation benefits specifically because it might dissuade people from moving to the state. It would be a tiny tax liability relative to other tax liabilities that already vary such as income tax, property tax, and sales taxes. If those differences do not dissuade people from moving, then a one time ~5% income tax on $5k to $20k of moving expenses is not going to move the needle.
Right, no one actually wants free speech, they're just mad when the moderator disagrees with them.
Fully concur here, and it's really confusing

"Good Intentions" Pavers now for sale
Doesn't touch on performance, and I believe the difference between the two is non-negligible.

Nvm, it absolutely does:

> And, ultimately, there’s that nagging feeling that you’re going against the grain by repurposing data attributes for styling — after all, selecting elements is what classes are for, and what browsers optimise for in selector performance.
Every week there's a $100 dollar lottery that everyone wins! Everyone is forced to play. Tickets are $100 each. Buy as many tickets as you like.
But they also deserve to have access to their work schedules, and I bet a good lawyer could argue that "access" should be interpreted broadly here.
Does clairvoyant means she had supernatural powers, or that she claimed she had?
> I think that a platform where people expect the ugly ideas to be debated (in good faith) will have the users that are willing to do that[1].

This does not actually...happen. At least not over the medium and long term. What actually happens, and you can see this in practice, is that decent people are not particularly interested, over long periods of time, in arguing that no, there is no globalist (read: Jewish) conspiracy to take over the world. They lose interest almost immediately, while the frothers intellectually crossbreed and turn from one particular flavor of bigot into all the flavors of bigot.

The problem isn't, as you are characterizing, that a platform must have "all the users". The problem is that this strategy hyperconcentrates relatively anodyne conservatives into literal-not-figurative fascists, and has been doing so for quite a while. The active creation of intellectual cul-de-sacs, of epistemic closures for hateful beliefs, is a major factor in why we're where we are right now.
Yet, it's not nearly as tiring as as people accusing other people of "force[ing] gender and identity based virtue signalling."

Especially since accusing others of virtue signalling is, itself, a form of [virtue] signalling - https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=42280
If asking for money feels odd to you, then approach it logically. First of all;
So why don't you simply not charge, if you don't care?
This comment reminds me of an LA Times Op-Ed from 2018 titled Why do poor Americans eat so unhealthfully? Because junk food is the only indulgence they can afford[1] and the more recent study that has been making the rounds on the same topic[2].

[1]https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-singh-food-deser...

[2]https://www.diabetes.co.uk/news/2022/sep/wider-socioeconomic...
The fastest command-line tools for querying large JSON datasets
Any service known for not proactively removing content will be overburdened as users from other services who submit 'complaint-generating' content will flock to your service.

When people who submit these complaints don't feel like you acquiesced in their favor they will assemble and call you out. Your service will be known as a safe harbor for groups of ill repute and eventually you may be forced to shutter the service because you're now known as the person enabling groups of ill repute.

I'm not saying it's right, I'm saying that's the cycle that history shows takes place. It seems effective at chilling the content in question and the service providers who serve it.

Examples: voat, rumble, Nchan, Nch, parler, the list goes on.
Related: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_source-code-host...
The article mentions that it scrapes data from the flight attendants' accounts. The data shown is broken up between "for the public" and "for flight attendants".
Yes, I'm referring to US federal income. No idea how state income tax rules work, as there's so many different rules and I'm sure they vary (e.g., one state may allow relo deductions, one state may not).
The push for equity says that no students should be able to do the math needed to start college
I don't know why I remembered it as win32 from when he wrote about it. Anyway. I remember downloading a save editor from AOL's software center, so the stuff on that page brings back memories. I had a broken 10+ MB save from trying to get every item and explore every block in every dungeon. I'd pile stuff up by category in the middle of town.
Its also very compliant with modern security rules.
I'm not so sure. If they're buying multiple back to back, they're still getting another little "I might win" dopamine hit with each one - decreasing perhaps, but still not zero. Same thing you see with casino gamblers. Buying multiple at the same instant is harder to explain. Maybe they're getting a slightly bigger hit because their odds are (almost infinitesimally better), but that's inefficient use of funds even compared to the quick-succession method.
You could probably open a PR to accept filepaths on stdin, or maybe use xargs.
> Public keys are constantly rotated

Not to my knowledge? I believe Coinbase lets you manage any number of public keys but there's nothing enforcing a "burn on use". Also, obviously, there's a central authority that has your name, government id, and keys.
This is it; they're still the hero in their narrative, it's just that this hero overcomes massive victimization.

That they use the victimization as power over others may not even be consciously acknowledged by them, or others.
That is not the case, and hasn't been for years.
Why would we need a study to tell us this?
algebra is taught comparably badly in many other places...
I personally would dismiss you as a lunatic and racist in both cases and move on with my day. However I see no reason why you shouldn't be able to make a fool of yourself if you so choose.

Making you feel like a martyr because you are being "censored" is worse in my opinion than allowing you to express your points of view and hopefully be receptive to counter arguments.
Yes, because punching on an even smaller minority is a good way to make a point about how black people are treated /s instead of punching up to the majority. In fact, he cares so much about his community, that he is against affordable housing because of course he is a NIMBY [1].

The transgender people (not transgenders), do not claim they have suffered more than his community, that's a strawman. Let's ask black trans people how their community has treated them.

This is a disgusting degree of mental gymnastics to excuse outright reprehensible behaviour.

[1] https://reason.com/2022/02/10/dave-chappelle-is-a-nimby/
https://archive.ph/4mUNX
Think of it like this, as long as you are actually providing the value they expected then they wouldn’t be paying for it at all if it wasn’t helping them make a profit (or reach whatever goal they have). So by them continuing to pay and use the system you’re helping them out, and they know it can’t exist if you don’t get paid.

I think it’s really that simple. In fact the money being paid for the service is proving that you’re doing the right thing, not the opposite.