skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
A computer that expands your vision by looking at the whole problem at once
What Netflix Will Look Like in 2023
This seems to my non-lawyer eyes like it doesn't have a strong fair-use defense, but I'm not that confident at all.

For anyone curious, these are the factors considered for that: https://support.google.com/legal/answer/4558992?hl=en
Yes, that's really true.
Lol I did consider that and the stockfish github repo
> If you would try to answer some of the questions I asked

And you need to answer one question to me because its all that matters.

Which law did Nancy Pelosi break in your example?

That's all that matters for rule of law. Whether or not people follow the law. If people are following the law, then we have rule of law. Your hypotheticals are distractions that should be ignored.

-----

Maybe your set of crappy laws are bad and awful. But they don't describe the US Code. If you want to criticize US Code, you need to do a better job at understanding it.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text

As it turns out, it is written far better than you seem to think. Yes, there's always contradictions and edge cases that get funny. But for the most part, the USA's laws are clear (if a bit arcane and verbose).
This is a very efficient moderation force. I'd be happy to get away with 10s of thousands per billion. That's still under 100 per million. Under 1 per 10,000.
You can use numbers to extend the range a bit (0=O, 1=L, 6=G, 5=S).

I used "0xdebac1e" as a magic number for a (terrible) file format once, no one noticed. Probably helped that my constant was declared byte-reversed...
Slow down there with the snarky comments. I never said GPL'd code doesn't have a copyright owner.
So, for your webpage to start it has first to download a 1.74Mb component?

Just because "it is cool"?
Nima Arkani-Hamed: The End of Space-Time [video]
This comment made me actually read the OPIndia article and wow it's pretty bad. To quote:

> The TrueIndology account is very popular and has thousands of followers. The person behind the account is a meticulous fact-checker who corrects wrong and distorted claims often pushed as history mostly by left-liberals, and cites actual sources to debunk myths and leftist propaganda on Indian history. Though the reasons for the accoun[sic] suspension are not clear, it comes just a day after he had ‘fact-checked’ and had idulged[sic] in an online arguement[sic] with senior IPS officer D Roopa.

Spelling errors are reproduced as is.

It's surprising how closely the "left-liberals"/"leftist propaganda" rhetoric matches "Leftist Media cabal"/"Western media propaganda outlets" language of the OP.
> Well probably no, they didn't pick and choose at all, they just "chose" everyone who put code online with a license. Which is a legal statement of ownership by each of those people, and implies legal liability as well.

What you're describing is a choice. They chose which people to believe, with zero vetting.

> The point is that with ML training data, such a vast quantity is required that it's unreasonable to expect humans to be able to research and guarantee the legal provenance of it all.

I'm not sure what you're presenting here is actually true. A key part of ML training is the training part. Other domains require a pass/fail classification of the model's output (see image identification, speech recognition, etc.) so why is source code any different? The idea that "it's too much data" is absolutely a cop-out and absurd, especially for a company sitting on ~$100B in cash reserves.

Your argument kind of demonstrates the underlying point here: They took the cheapest/easiest option and it's harmed the product.

> A crawler simply believes that licenses, which are legally binding statements, are made by actual owners, rather than being fraud. It does seem reasonable to address the issue with takedowns, however.

Yes, and to reiterate, they chose this method. They were not obligated to do this, they were not forced to pick this way of doing things, and given the complete lack of transparency it's a large leap of faith to assume that their training data simply looked at LICENSE files to determine which licenses were present.

For what it's worth, it doesn't seem that that's what OpenAI did when they trained the model initially in their paper[1]:

Our training dataset was collected in May 2020 from 54 mil-
lion public software repositories hosted on GitHub, contain-
ing 179 GB of unique Python files under 1 MB. We filtered
out files which were likely auto-generated, had average line
length greater than 100, had maximum line length greater
than 1000, or contained a small percentage of alphanumeric
characters. After filtering, our final dataset totaled 159 GB.

I have not seen anything concrete about any further training after that, largely because it isn't transparent.

[1]: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2107.03374.pdf
The zero-base just highlights the affectation.
That's not what Web 3.0 is:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_Web
Their metaverse is exactly a video game.
You are probably using something that builds on it. It's the IETF standard for IM, scales very well and it still seems to be the industry standard for large messaging systems (WhatsApp, Zoom, Jitsi, Nintendo Switch presence... are known to be using XMPP).

Cool community projects which also care about the federation aspects are jmp.chat, snikket.org or movim.eu (a federated social network built on XMPP PubSub nodes that broadcast ATOM items). There are communities that are on XMPP, but I currently use it mostly for friends and family.
Lol. I had a US Congressman write a personal reference for me because I went to the right schools with the right kids. It’s so much more hackable.

A high SAT score is like a ripped body: you can spend money on coaches, and they can help, but ultimately you need to lift the weight yourself.
Yup! It's annoying. Dolts should have called it Web 4.0.
The goal is fast streamlined rejection. You want an enormous list of well defined rejections. Doing one more isn't a challenge. Getting rejected faster, more efficiently, more accurately and for better reasons.

Pretend you run their business, would the product be as useful as it was designed to be? To answer that question you need some information.

If your software is going to be super useful for an event that happens only 1 time per year and doesn't take much time to do manually you don't have to wait for them to explain this to you in their complex polite way.

If it is useful to them, can they afford locking themselves into the service? What happens if the product is discontinued? What will it cost to clean up behind you?

If there is a way out and they cant afford it you can still gain a free user but it might be better not to.

Every second you spend is a second not spend on the next prospect who might badly need your product. You want to waste as little of their time as necessary, when the task is completed it is completed for both parties. The goal was to figure out if it fits. When done you thank them for successfully completing the task.

You have to dial down your clock cycle to their working speed. It is your moment of relaxation. The real work is moving between such interactions as fast as humanly possible.
Films are often edited to be quite different from the shooting script, so it's not necessarily about the end product, it's more about intentions.

The minute-per-page rule is really for two purposes: first to judge the general intended length of the movie (90 min? 160 min?) and therefore budget when shopping it around, and second in order to plan out a shooting schedule -- e.g. if you plan on being able to shoot 3 pages per day to produce 3 minutes of final footage per day.

Screenwriters often actually adjust the length of their descriptions in order to make it one minute per page, since you can't change dialog, but you can add or tighten descriptive language. They'll literally sit with a stopwatch and visualize the shots and say the lines out loud, and then adjust if it's wrong.

But once it goes into editing, then everything flies out the window -- the director and editor figure out what works best with what they shot regardless of what was on the page. Whole scenes frequently get dropped, especially in TV.
The activity feed still shows you made PRs into the upstream right?
> Actually, they do by not using E2EE by default and providing bad encryption possiblities.

These are again baseless claims. If you think MTProto 2.0, an encryption algorithm that has been audited multiple times by independent researchers is 'bad encryption', I'd like for you to prove it. Obviously, if you can prove it's bad, you could let Telegram know and win a bounty.

> How about you prove your claims? I hardly can bring them to justice when even the police doesn't have immediate access to them.

The burden of proof is not me as I did not make any claims, I simply restated what's on the Telegram website.

Even the FBI, Iran or Russian government couldn't bribe them so I do trust Telegram to not backdown on their statement and philosophy about not selling or using userdata for profit. https://twitter.com/durov/status/912812889236475904

> Second, regardless of your claims, Telegram can easily write a service which has access to plain text messages.

You do know even Signal could add a keylogger service to read message content right? I don't suppose their Google Play Store version has reproducible builds. See how easily arguments like these break down? You can almost assume anything and claim almost anything. As I said, these are baseless claims and assumptions. I'm only interested in the objective truth at the moment, not assumptions or guesses.

> Since when is "bad for privacy" a reason for suing?

You're suggesting Telegram's privacy policy is in direct violation of their privacy practices which is illegal. This is a huge claim, if you can prove it you should sue them, I'd honestly do that if I were you.

> I didn't, did I? please explain

Privacy is about choosing what to share, not about sharing nothing. You seem to lie more on the anonymity side of the argument than privacy rights. You're fighting for anonymity, not privacy if you claim malicious intent on Telegram's part because as I showed earlier, their privacy practices and security are totally A OK.
> Subtitles can be auto-generated.

Is that legally any different from OCRing a copyrighted book? Or maybe running an audiobook through speech-to-text..
> You don't know about Nupur Sharma, but seems to know about BJP.

I'm Australian. I know what the ruling party of India is, but I certainly don't claim any deep knowledge of Indian politics.

I just Googled Nupur Sharma and she seems to have come to prominence in July 2022[1]. I guess my knowledge of Indian politics is 3 or 4 months behind? Not sure what the relevance is.

[1] https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-61716241
That is inherently paternalistic and sounds reminiscent of colonial attitudes. The claim is that we're protecting the listener from the impact of their own decisions on their own life.

If you believe you can change an adult's mind in a normal situation (for example, we are not including someone isolated through prison, cults, etc. or of diminished mental capacity) then you're claiming the ability to change their mind to their detriment and their inability to see the impact of that change.

In this situation, you have done something to them like the Pied Piper, leading them away from community...except that the pied piper was only able to lead children.
Radio? What's that? /s
If you think that if everyone followed the "no one except the emperor can trade with privileged information" law then there is rule of law, then we have irreconcilable axioms in our belief systems and will never be able to see eye to eye.
Fix-PAL: Slow down an MKV movie to correct for PAL speedup
So for Rick and Morty they might be referring to a similarly changing story board document.
Given that the spec requires Service Workers to be optional, future Web specs & implementations may build upon that requirement, so writing your software to assume they always load is both brittle today and subject to unexpected breakage in future.
Abortions too
The license for other code, even when in the same repo, doesn't apply to the license on the code that is under discussion here.
Don't try to sell something useless.
past thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27081084
[Edit: some kind stranger explained to me how to bypass the depth limit so I’ve posted it below. Leaving this here anyways as I don’t like editing the past]

I can’t reply to your response down thread as HN limits the depth of nested comments, so I’ll post here to your previous response.

I can do this all night if you want. I have a law degree (never practiced as I found other ways to make significantly more money) and my focus in law school was securities law. I am 100% certain of the law on this, regardless of how many times you cherry-pick sections out of context to try to make a point. But here’s my response to your latest:

This regulation refines the fair disclosure regulation when issuers (and people acting on their behalf, the definition of which you quoted), are required to make fair disclosure to the broad market of certain material, non-public information.

This regulation does not imply that insider trading can only be perpetrated by insiders of an issuer. This is simply incorrect.
GPAs, letters of rec, honors only prove that a student has a safe and secure environment and they are able to excel over a long term. That is a reflection of privilege.

For those of us who grew up in poor and broken households, standardized testing is the only chance for us to get a better life.

The suggestion that somehow there is a single path out of this sort of hell is overselling the point and over generalizing.

I grew up in a house where my parents were two warring alcoholics, one of which didn't want to have kids at all and the other didn't want the responsibility of raising them. And true enough, I didn't do well in the grades department... but I graduated, had some collected honors at graduation time, had the letters of recommendation I needed, and I absolutely participated in extra-curricular activities if anything to escape being home. Standardized tests? I took the ACT on a whim when my friend said he was going to go in the morning and asked if I wanted to join. I scored well (much better than I expected), not spectacular, just did well. Didn't really move the needle for me nearly so much as my ability to "work the room" with those that could help me get through school and onward as a sub-standard student. In the end I did fine.

My wife hits your points even closer. She was the child of poor immigrants whose mother was very severely schizophrenic. Between having no money and dealing with constant delusional and violent outbursts at home she managed to graduate high school as the school valedictorian (in a large metropolitan school), graduated with full honors, and received a full ride scholarship to her first choice school. She did the work because she knew if she didn't she wouldn't escape the hell of home she was in. Know what she didn't do well with? Her standardized tests. By the time she had reached high school she was prone to anxiety attacks and formal, timed tests were just too much. In fact later in life she wanted to take the GRE and go to graduate school and she couldn't get through the test without a full break down. Even so, she's done well in life despite it all.

But the point is that your expression of your experience is only that: your experience. For both my wife and myself, the standardized tests were simply not factors despite the hardships we faced. This is why anecdote isn't a good way to come to real knowledge... it might have been true for you but other's mileage will vary.
I think that the speed of light limitation is insurmountable. Advanced civilizations become insular and stay close in space to themselves to minimize communication latency. They all become addicted to Internets and never go exploring very far, if at all.
Yes, but I was pointing that out to my parent poster, who erronesouly said the code was GPL licensed.
Reproducing a copyrighted work in full as a part of publicly available collection is pretty clearly not, though, otherwise Pirate Bay would be 100% legit.
That's not how the law was written.

The law, as written, is that "Insiders" (aka: Officers, Board Members, etc. etc.), and those who those insiders talk to (ie: employees, family members, etc. etc.), are not allowed to trade on the information they know about.

The law never considered Congressmen, who might know something because of their position.

------

The law, as written, is "X people, and people who talk to those X people, are not allowed to trade securities based on information they know about".

Your characterization of "X people except the emperor" is blatantly wrong and fundamentally misunderstands how the law is written.
It is foolish to build storage before there is renewable generating capacity to charge it from. So, everybody builds generating capacity first.

Storage cost is falling even faster than renewable generation did.
If ghosts could speak, their speech would approximate this key (1778)
I don't think it's morally wrong if you set and meet expectations. I do think it's morally wrong if there's deception involved. The question is posed in a similar manner to "is sexting cheating on your spouse?" Well, yeah, if you're not willing to inform them about it.

I've done it a few times and we usually cover the expectations for freelancing on the job. Usually this means a lower salary for this "show up in office and do whatever you want" block of time. Remote can be the exact opposite - "don't show up in office, but get more work done"
An Interview with Jerry Seinfeld (2017)
How much real power do empires possess if they all die young? I’d argue the institutions that stick around and shape the centuries largely through influence have the real power.
That’s a terrible test.

“It is better for ten guilty people to found innocent than for one innocent person to be found guilty” - is one of the our bedrock principles.

The wealthy and powerful are regularly charged with crimes in America - Epstein, Bannon, etc.

The poor face the brunt of legal prosecution more often, but he wealthy and powerful are far from immune.
While I don’t support privacy invasions, I think, as a teen who was exploited online by adults, that there needs to be more protection for young people online. A client side scanning solution sounds ideal in this regard.
> Essentially godlike aliens go around killing other aliens for hell of it. It'S fOr SeLf ProTeCtIoN! Please.

Isn't the point the point that they aren't godlike? They're glass cannons, capable of creating weapons with incredible power, but incapable of defending themselves against that same class of weapon.
I had a funny where I apparently sold a lot of stuff years after I left.
In Catholic terminology, a complete detachment from sin doesn't mean a lack of temptation, or even that we won't sin in the future. Here are some explanations of what complete detachment from sin means:

>The recipient must be free from all attachment to sin, even venial sin. Although a person might still sin, as we all do, or even be inclined to habitual sin, such as using God's name in vain, yet so long as the attachment to the sin or the desire to commit it is absent from the person's soul, he or she would be considered "free from attachment to sin." (If this disposition is in any way less than perfect or if any of the prescribed three conditions are not fulfilled, the indulgence will be only partial.)[1]

>To be attached to a sin is to be comfortable in that sin; to return to it again and again without much resistance to the temptation to commit it. It is an addiction, where the desire to commit the sin is stronger than the desire to serve God. In essences, it is serving God with reservation and not with total abandonment.[1]

>The requirement for someone to be totally detached from sin needs some explanation. No doubt it is the most difficult condition for obtaining the indulgence. Notably, however, the requirement is not freedom from all sin. Rather, it is freedom from attachment to sin; that is, that there is no sin which the soul is unwilling to renounce. A person should be able to tell if he is fulfilling this condition. An attachment involves a refusal to amend a situation, and a person should be able to tell if he has such an attachment. Sometimes, deep down, we really don’t want to let go of certain sins, be it gossiping or overeating or loafing on the job. This differs from the case of normal human weakness or where a person falls into the same sin many times before overcoming it.[2]

[1] https://acatholiclife.blogspot.com/2013/05/free-from-all-att...

[2] https://spiritualdirection.com/2010/11/18/what-is-total-deta...
Have you seen Krebs on Security most recent update. He pretty much disavowed his reporting on the Ubiquity breach.

Everybody has security breaches. I'm not out there counting CVEs, but anecdotally, it seems that Netgear, TP-Link, microtik have seem to have much worse reputations.

I don't pay attention to the market for high end networking (Cisco, Juniper).
Have you seen how much you need to download to make Figma work? Not saying that every page should be like that but...
The attacks are designed to only require downlink information, so they‘re triggered by the base station.

In fact, this is in practice the only range limitation of the system - wherever the downlink could be decoded, the attack worked.

In the paper you can see that the attack over 3.8km worked with an omnidirectional antenna and required only very little output power.
Dashboard of crypto hack values by date
The chip itself isn't verifiable, like the document says. It's possible that there's a backdoor. It's not likely, but it's not verifiable and you'll have to trust it.
For anybody else who wants to know about the whiteboard incident: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28064941
Bjork is so hot!
I think theres a pretty good niche to be carved out here, the Raspberry Pi Pico
is just too minimal to run Linux or another "full" operating system like it, which can give you several quality of life features for free especially networking related ones like DHCP/mDNS/etc... meanwhile the Raspberry Pi Zero family are all but impossible to get in stock to experiment with let alone rely on getting a hold of, its more powerful than you need for a lot of smaller applications. I've got one use where it was the only good choice but it always rubbed me the wrong way I was seeing such a big premium in getting a Zero W + shipping (locals never in stock) + time spent hunting, just to get USB-OTG to pretend to be a keyboard and have linux networking for 3-way network based auto-discovery service between the 3 devices I was building. The Ox64 can definitely be a very competitive new product in the "low end but not arduino" area, I wont be surprised if this quickly becomes one of the best supported devices Pine ever make once a lot of people have gotten their hands on it and started tinkering.
Analogies are more suited to understanding the point of view of the person making them.
I mean, I've hired plumbers to fix a problem, they had a 2 hour minimum charge, but it only took 30 minutes to fix the problem. So I had them do 90 minutes of other plumbing stuff that wasn't urgent (mostly hey, where does this pipe go), no additional charge.
Don’t Bother Learning ReactJS