skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It absolutely does.

Here’s like the first link after a DuckDuckGo search for “copyright utilitarian”:

However, copyright law does not extend to useful items. Therefore, complications may arise when sculptural works are also “useful” items. In these instances, copyright law will protect purely artistic elements of a useful article as long as the useful item can be identified and exists independently of the utilitarian aspects of the article (this concept is sometimes called the “separability test”). 17 U.S.C. §. A “useful article” is an article that has a purpose beyond pure aesthetic value.

https://www.rtlawoffices.com/articles/can-i-copyright-my-des...

Is it safe to assume the rest of the downvotes were from people who were also incorrect?
There's an ancient history here which is both amusing and worth noting. For most of a century, starting way back, the US patent office would receive constant applications describing simple automatic dimmers from inventors who had never considered what would happen if two cars equipped with such dimmers approached each other at night. A whole lotta flickering is what would have happened. This literally became the paradigm for the patent office of what a trash invention that shouldn't be given a patent looked like.
How to Save the Planet in Less Than Two Hours
TIL about Colima - thanks! Grabbing it now on my M1 Mac.
that is not what proprietary means and you know it.
I am strongly against intellectual property, but I don’t like this idea that any one of us will get in big trouble for openly violating IP restrictions, but if one of these big companies scoops up copyrighted works for their AI it’s fine? The double standard is unfair. This all seems like a great opportunity for big companies to encourage the growth of Creative Commons, which would benefit everyone, but instead they’re making large private datasets only they control.
There are SSGs with nice WYSIWYG UIs coming, including one for Hugo.

https://open.quiqr.org

That still leaves the question of how to handle site search and comments.
Again we are discussing it right now. You don't see the use, I do.

Whether I will be right time will tell, I am pretty sure I will, and the idea that this is a useless technology is simply a question of vision.

There are plenty of use cases which are theoretically possible with Web2 but not feasible without Blockchain.
zuck has thrown some lengendary parties in the bay area
some of it is lgpl and some of it is gpl. code contributed by others is licensed differently.
Same here.

Looks like someone at Google is having a very intense Sunday evening (or Monday morning)
http://issuetracker.google.com/253920702
If they’re both “full time” work, I don’t see how can pull that off (“perform”).

If both jobs require availability during the same hours (“business hours”), how would you juggle meetings? If I was your manager at the one company and hear from you that can’t attend a meeting because of your other job, I would probably look to replace you.

More generally: put yourself in your managers shoes and try to imagine under what circumstances they’d be less than thrilled.
Street view is not working in India: a pop-up says "Cannot reach server."

Google Maps on IOS.
In my opinion Copilot helps with the easy, boring stuff by typing what I likely would have typed anyway. The harder the code to write, the less likely I'd be to lean on Copilot.
As described in the book, the ease with which advanced civs can destroy other civs would likely cancel out any % of visibility in this model.
There are also lights that adjust to slopes, such as when cresting a hill. And lights that greatly widen at T and cross intersections so you can see where you are going to turn too.
You are born with the ability to sell. Or you aren't

The people on hn will downvote me for this, but it's true. And practically none of them are sellers
I'm curious how you could possibly know that for sure.
CloudFlare Pages is also free, although I've had no luck getting the SSL certificate part of it working. Plus I am not sure I want to support CloudFlare with its expanding grip on the web, like forcing users with cookie-blockers or VPNs to go through intrusive CAPTCHAs to access sites.
Features outside the face is lost/changed from original on the right, so can’t be face inpainting. Unlikely to be style transfers, because some body parts are moved. Most plausibly this was generated.

So much for “generation” - it seems as if these models are just overfitting on extremely small subset of input data that it did not utterly failed to train on, almost that there could be geniuses who would be able to directly generate weight data from said images without all the gradient descent thing.
Did I miss something? If you have something that -should- have a non-reversable hash indicating that it is signed should that not work in all cases? I mean I don't see how anyone could argue that is "ok" even as an admin. At the very least it should throw up a warning and say "this driver is signed but it's not jiving with what is supposed to be there and likely malware so you shouldn't install it or know exactly what you are installing"
Have you tried looking at adjacent roles in your bigco? e.g. sales engineer, tech evangelist, heck even technical writer team. Maybe talk to your manager to do if you could some shadowing or secondment just to see if you'll like it.
> With stable diffusion it's much closer to someone remixing and aping the images than it is reproducing originals.

So very similar to how the music industry treats sampling then?

Everybody using CoPilot needs to get "code sample clearance" from the original copyright holder before publishing their remix or new program that uses snippets of somebody else's code...

Try explaining _that_ to your boss and legal department.

"To: <all software dev> Effective immediately, any use of Github is forbidden without prior written approval from both the CTO and General Councel."
Sony releases its first over-the-counter hearing aids
Can't drag the little guy onto a street -- just bounces back.
Here's a bit of a comparison that I wrote the last time Mutagen was posted:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30966448
https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/series/C84/foxfire-series
no way, are you part of 100 rabbits?, I've been following your sailboat posts for a while and I've cooked a bunch of the recipes from your site. So cool to see you here.
I’ve used Karabiner to remap presentation remotes for years, it’s come in handy when remotes were being weird or I needed to repeatedly practice (remapped a key to reset my keynote presentation to the start so I could practice timing)
For Go, I want a better type system, better syntax, better exception handling.

For rust, I want simpler syntax and simpler memory safety.

For python, I want something much faster, an actually existing typesystem (not fancy linter comments pretending to be a typesystem), otherwise I'd be using Ruby.
Sure but checking a driver signature isn't, in this case it simply didn't work.
I think it's multiple problems that compound when combined.

1. You have to find someone who is as passionate as you about whatever it is you're going to work on.
2. You have to find someone who wants to (and is in a life place where they can) take the risk of starting a company.
3. You have to find someone who is responsible enough to help run a company.

You're weeding out most people once you hit all 3 criteria...
This sounds excessively paranoid to me. If you’re worried about backdoors and the threat model includes the ability to compromise the CPU, you probably need to back up a few steps and figure out how the CPU got compromised? What am I missing?
There will never be enough "adversarial hardening". It will never be possible for people to verify that their Lego blocks of finance are actually robust. The only thing that will create trust is time elapsed without an exploit, but that means that the only thing trustworthy will be the oldest, most ossified pieces. But as soon as you start composing those pieces with anything custom, you're back in danger. Welcome to the dark forest.
I think these types of complex people problems are fundamentally unsolvable, especially if you're looking at it from the perspective of a software engineer. It's like trying to solve hiring, or solve matchmaking, or anything where people and relationships are at the root of the issue and the solution. The best solutions to these problems are still really bad because every person is unique and deeply complex in their own right.
This looks like advanced technology on the order of the Minority Report UIs.

Count me in to try it!

https://youtube.com/watch?v=PJqbivkm0Ms
Why must it be justified? This is a financial system, not a battle of rhetoric. If you don’t want to participate, don’t. Evidently, enough people want to participate.
I guess that would be nice, but no, I’ve never heard of anything like that.

“error” is simply bottom. Bottom is an inhabitant of every Haskell type. There’s no straightforward way to just turn it off.
You can buy almost any air ticket from the airline website.

The only reason to get to a middleman is so that you have a bigger variety of options to chose from, as they can sell from multiple airlines (and also bear some costs and buy in bulk in advance from the airline and sell cheaper).
Well, here's a question. Is GitHub violating the LGPL by including the code in their copilot data? Or is it Copilot users who end up using the regurgitated code?

I guess GitHub is violating it the instant their servers send verbatim snippets like this to developers without the copyright notice. And then the Copilot users are also violating it when (if) they release their code that contains verbatim snippets and no notice.

This is a pretty good live experiment on how useful these open source licenses really are. This guy find his license is being violated, so what does he do? If complaining on Twitter seems like the best course of action then maybe we need to rethink the system.
The other popular hobbyist board lineup with Zigbee is based on the nRF52840. Most of those boards are $20+, so it will be interesting to see what DIY low power IOT options this opens up at the $6 price point (if not perpetually out of stock).

Personally, I'm excited to build a Zigbee local-only garage door opener (my current one is a WiFi based Ratgdo), neophillia might finally motivate me to do it.
Surely at the very least it'd be a TOS violation? I doubt any stock photo service grants you enough rights to redistribute their watermarked free image samples? Especially not in the context of a project like Stable Diffusion?
> Because each channel had an effective base bandwidth of 10 MHz and a TV program used 4 MHz, it was possible to house a TV program and a small number of telephone lines on the same channel simultaneously

Only a few telephone lines on 6MHz!!! How large guard bands do you need on a 3Khz telephone line?

Edit: layout
It was definitely a CYA move at first, no argument there. 17 years later, though, it's held up surprisingly well.
>Focus on features

NO

EDIT: If you are a programmer, please do not give this guy your advice on selling. Seriously, you are sabotaging him and it's not cool
Althought I don't know if you are half joking, that is my situation. I didn't drank a lot, only a couple of beers or glasses of wine on the weekend, but I stopped drinking in preparation for my first child born, several months ago. I realized that I do not wish her to smell alcohol on my breath.
It also gave birth to the recording artist. It certainly didn’t get rid of musicians.
> There are no real uses of blockchain technology today that aren’t a variation on financial speculation (aka gambling) and illicit activity.

This gets repeated a lot, and it's simply not true. It's a telltale sign that there's simply too much emotion in the arguments around blockchain - any post about tor and bittorrent doesn't receive nearly as many (if any) "but it's only for criminals" comments.

Being able to own and trade a digital asset in much the same way a physical asset is traded is potentially a huge use for blockchains. Large players aren't about to model ownership of the digital goods they sell as items on a blockchain, but it's a big opportunity for smaller players.
have you seen the Facebook metaverse? it does not have legendary parties
because they look for reflected signals, which changes how the waveform is shaped, and there is circuitry which ignores unreflected inputs.

additionally, the radars sweep through their bands rather than broadcast on all of it at once, so the chance of them looking for the frequency that the other radar is sending at the exact moment it is being sent is very small, and when it does happen it is easily ignored.

the sweeping is what provides the ability to easily detect movement and change in distance from radar to target.

this is all based on a book I read years ago, so I apologize if any of it is not exactly on the dot accurate.
Another project by a friend of mine. Shameless promotion: https://akaricons.com/
95% is a ridiculous exaggeration. How well can these cars do in the winter? You know, that season we have that can easily keep the ground covered with snow and/or ice for 30% of the year in many cities. I lived in Chicago and it was genuinely difficult to drive for 3-4 months of the year. How well can these cars do during the very rainy hurricane season in Florida?

Do people who work in this industry actually think they've solved 95% of driving scenarios because their software can manage driving in sunny California, Nevada, and Arizona?
It also gave birth to the photographic portrait artist. It certainly did not get rid of portrait artists in general.

This was of course a leading question. The point was to get you to think about what artists did in response to the photograph. They changed the way they paint.

I'm positive that machine learning will also change the way that people create are and I am positive that it will only add to the rich tapestry of creative possibilities. There are still realistic portrait painters, after all, they're just not as numerous.
Not sure if it shows because he have this other code on his computer (only)
There’s nothing “dumb” with building wealth (to finance retirement or otherwise) with stocks/funds. It’s the primary mechanism the rich use to build and retain wealth.

Pensions have major issues. The government has not made a very good case for “we should manage more retirement funds” with the state of the SSI trust. 401ks are a next move to address downfalls and failures with how other options have played out. But yeah anyone can do dumb shit with money to their detriment; that’s very difficult to overcome.
It doesn't seem that far off to me. Copyright makes more sense in a larger context, such as making a Windows clone by copy pasting code from some Windows leak.

Without that context, fizzbuzz is not that different from a matrix transpose function to me.
Put simply: by selling.

How is it you learn anything? Not by asking questions, but by doing it.

By fumbling your way around until things start to make sense.
If there isn’t anything wrong, why would you not want to tell your employer? If both you and your employer are on board then you are good.

The real reasons are that few people can actually deliver two jobs effectively and most jobs expect you to be accessible and available for some set of working hours.
Wireless Charging Electric Taxi Trial Goes Live
1. Most people I come across see businesses as a way to do minimum work for maximum profit. It really is a lot of work of to get them to work.

2. Then you have other personality/cultural fit. Things that you can't change. Risk tolerance. Attitude towards employees. Negotiation styles. Attitude towards growth hacking.

3. Out of the remaining, most are not interested in the domain.

4. And once you get past all that, most just can't quit their jobs and jump into something with a 90% failure rate.
I'm a trained musician, and what I'm referring to is often called mental play[0]. Einstein referred to it as visual thinking. Many successful experts across many domains will tell you that visualization skills are a key factor in their success.

Any practice routine worth its salt includes visualization exercises. For example, players are encouraged to use mirrors while they learn in order to strengthen their visual memory, and eventually players are taught to imagine the instrument in their head, to imagine practicing. This has shown to be a viable method for making real improvements while not even holding your instrument, including boosting your muscle memory as your body learns to make stronger associations.

[0] https://fundamentals-of-piano-practice.readthedocs.io/chapte...
Yeah but it's not going to be a part of a library. It'll be a few lines of code from a library.
Don't you agree it is easier to set up a business through blockchain, and get paid for running some service?

I am building a side-project that runs on Google Cloud. I think most tricky part for me, will be setting up the payment system without breaking any tax laws...Should I just put a Paypal pay button?

I could easily get paid through a smart-contract, verify transaction and run the given CloudRun job all without any 3rd-party involvement, or any worries about tax/business account setup.
Quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi[0]

[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quod_licet_Iovi,_non_licet_b...
This. If your jobs are in tech, you can’t do this without violating your employment contracts with both companies. You can just do it anyway, and that’s all well and good until your manager discovers that you have a second job and has to fire you (there are things good managers can and will look past, but that’s not one of them).
NNs can and do encode information from their training sets in the models themselves, sometimes verbatim.

Sometimes the original information is there in the model, encoded/compressed/however you want to look at it, and can be reproduced.
Howdy, folks. Ryan here from the GitHub Copilot product team. I don’t know how the original poster’s machine was set-up, but I’m gonna throw out a few theories about what could be happening.

If similar code is open in your VS Code project, Copilot can draw context from those adjacent files. This can make it appear that the public model was trained on your private code, when in fact the context is drawn from local files. For example, this is how Copilot includes variable and method names relevant to your project in suggestions.

It’s also possible that your code – or very similar code – appears many times over in public repositories. While Copilot doesn’t suggest code from specific repositories, it does repeat patterns. The OpenAI codex model (from which Copilot is derived) works a lot like a translation tool. When you use Google to translate from English to Spanish, it’s not like the service has ever seen that particular sentence before. Instead, the translation service understands language patterns (i.e. syntax, semantics, common phrases). In the same way, Copilot translates from English to Python, Rust, JavaScript, etc. The model learns language patterns based on vast amounts of public data. Especially when a code fragment appears hundreds or thousands of times, the model can interpret it as a pattern. We’ve found this happens in <1% of suggestions. To ensure every suggestion is unique, Copilot offers a filter to block suggestions >150 characters that match public data. If you’re not already using the filter, I recommend turning it on by visiting the Copilot tab in user settings.

This is a new area of development, and we’re all learning. I’m personally spending a lot of time chatting with developers, copyright experts, and community stakeholders to understand the most responsible way to leverage LLMs. My biggest take-away: LLM maintainers (like GitHub) must transparently discuss the way models are built and implemented. There’s a lot of reverse-engineering happening in the community which leads to skepticism and the occasional misunderstanding. We’ll be working to improve on that front with more blog posts from our engineers and data scientists over the coming months.
As an employer I don't want to be constantly micromanaging work for you to get done. I want to make a list of tasks and have you work through them as fast as you can. If you're working for someone else, that means you're either taking longer than you need to take or you're not being honest about how quickly things can get done.

I don't want to manage people at that level. I want there to be trust so we can both grow the company together. How can I do that if I am competing with you for your own time?
Yeah you can just throw some "AI" into the code and suddenly people are okay with it stealing licensed code. I really thought technically inclined people would be resistant to this type of manipulation from advertisers but it seems like most people are totally going for it!
Most carefully claim that the laws they write apply equally to everyone, not that they equally apply them to everyone

Which (and I hate to ever sound likey I'm defending Facebook) is quite common in legal systems.
As Matt Levine says, “everything is securities fraud,” and this is probably the area of greatest exposure for a company with a substantial degree of departure between their stated practices and their actual practices.

It’s not likely to be more than a nuisance to defend and not terribly expensive to settle, but an enterprising plaintiff’s lawyer could probably find a cause of action that passes summary judgment.
Visualization is a skill you must develop, a muscle in its own right you have to mentally flex. You don't visualize because you were not taught to, didn't think of it on your own, and thus don't practice it. It's not required for success, but it's a great tool for learning and improving.
> Then it won't be a crime for any of us to copy Windows and Office either. You bet we're gonna go for it too.

Don't worry. At that time all of the available hardware will refuse to run any software unless it comes with a signed license from one of the big three.
Because you haven’t enabled that extension in incognito mode?
Kotlin also wasn’t invented at Google.
The Muslims who colonized Iberia were referred to as Moors because of their Maghreb origin (cf old Mauritania)...

That's not the whole truth. Invaders came from far away Arabia, but they were few. From the top of my head, a few thousands.

Roman era Hispania was said to reach a million population. Not sure if that number declined during the Goths' kingdom (that were also a minority themselves) so the Arabians had to recruit 100k warriors of Maghribi origin to help them subjugate the peninsula.

When I hear "Moorish" (I'm Spanish, not an English native speaker, so not sure how they've come with that word) I suspect they're translating "un invento del tiempo de los moros" that would be more precisely translated as "an invention from the time of muslim Spain".

If it was invented here, it was a Spanish invention, no matter what the religion or ethnic group of the author was. If it was brought from outside, it would be interesting to know if it came from Arabia or the Maghreb.

I disagree that "moro" is a bad word in Spanish. It's just descriptive of NW Africa. Those countries are Morocco and Mauritania in English and I don't see their inhabitants protesting the names.

There's a weird projection phenomenom around denomyns: some people attribute ill intentions to perfectly natural names that the addressed people find fine. In Spain, I've heard someone upset about calling "Chinese" to... Chinese people and suggested calling them "Asian" or something like that because "Chinese" is derogatory. WTF?
Should I just put a Paypal pay button?

Probably, yes. A lot of businesses big and small do this, and they're not in violation of any tax or other laws. Plus you get paid in actual money.