skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Does an unworthy email in your inbox harm anybody? Scale this up to see the issue. Wikipedia notability guidelines exist for this reason https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(academic...
My garden - https://notado.app
RAM errors are the last thing you'll test before your computer is fixed.
IIUC it doesn't directly advertise this (and in many cases tries to hide this) but it can be fingerprinted.
The term political economy far predates Marx. I've not heard of Marx famously using it, but I don't doubt he did use it since it was an established field of inquiry at the time--the predecessor to the modern field of economics.
No substitute to getting out and actually doing the sell but this book will get you tons of ammunition to make your offer bullet proof. Don't go by the title. It has very actionable advise:

$100M Offers: How To Make Offers So Good People Feel Stupid Saying No

https://www.amazon.com/100M-Offers-People-Stupid-Saying-eboo...
Agreed. More details are necessary to understand the potential benefit of such rewrites.

And to be honest 21K LOC is not a big project. I can imagine that as project grows even larger, there will be problems that htmx cannot or is difficult to handle, and I'll be curious about how that would work out.
Id highly encourage anyone who is baffled by this to explore the field of science known as Metrology.
Hot take: If every layer of your stack focused on similarly useless performance improvements, the web would be a much better place.
Vladimir Lenin Became a Mushroom
The "h" in the name of the mice stands for "humanized" so the fact that they did this experiment in mice is close to irrelevant, the cells being infected are genetically engineered to be the same as ours.
Yeah right.

Looks like The Wire got fooled by their source OR is lying.

https://twitter.com/alexstamos/status/1581407731159748608
Why do you claim that poor people have no education?

The OP said "I assure you, poor people care about the environment", but whether you believe that or not, the point was this: "Poor people generally don't even have enough time and energy to advocate for themselves for things like affordable housing and the end of food deserts."

Poor people clearly care about affordable housing. They have to care. You don't need a fancy education for that. But the ability to express that caring in a way that affects politicians and the political system takes a lot more time, effort, and especially money.

Who finances political campaigns, the tenants or the landlords? That pretty much explains the end results. How much money do environmental groups have available to spend vs. industry groups? Our politics is pay-to-play.
>This is a positive effort, and that’s it.

Why is creating hundreds of articles of zero substance a positive effort?
I'm sorry but I just can't take your comment seriously.

You think... "dead French women" don't belong on Wikipedia?

Do you have any idea how many dead French men are on Wikipedia?

I cannot fathom what leads you to describe someone as a "dead French woman"... or even as a "random Canadian", as if any Canadian that nnopepe has never heard of sure doesn't belong in Wikipedia...!

I have no idea if these two meet the standards for notability or not. But I do know that being obnoxious never stopped deletionist editors before. I'm not sure there's anyone in the world more stubborn than Wikipedia deletionist editors.
humanity can't crush a bunch of cubic km of rock and spread over vast areas of land in a non-polluting way. It won't be carbon negative after drilling, blasting, digging, crushing, transporting, and spreading it around. If you can do it on your garden as a side-effect of hobby gardening, that is a nice benefit.

BTW, I worked as mechanic on heavy equip, crushers, drills, and haulage at many mines.
Like I mention, all of the evidence The Wire has used here is likely fabricated. Not by the Wire themselves, but by the source they’re relying on.
medium has been on my uBlacklist for a while now, since when im searching for ML references to read theres often some halfassed medium article above the actual paper.
What Is Onion Links?
Please I need 'actual' answers.
I get what you're saying, but nobody is going to run three trials of memtest86 on their machine and chalk the data corruption up to cosmic radiation. When memory dies are broken, they're broken. It's pretty simple to ascertain that, if you suspect your memory has gone bad.
Yes this is an excellent example of different cultures and ecosystems.

In Python a library like requests is a thin abstraction over http calls it is very easy to understand what is going on and get started.

In Java, there is a tendency to wrap everything so it fits with a framework and is super generic and configurable. For example look at the Feign library.

Each approach has its pro's and cons, but knowing both of them good as it allows you to pick the right solution for different use cases.

About getting into java: i'd recommend using Spring Boot. I provides a low abstraction http client (RestTemplate) that allows for straightforward calls to REST services.
Not a full and completely separate implementation though. Just wrappers to mask differences in compositor extensions that haven't been stabilized yet. If there are none the implementation is simply impossible.
To be the most useful you have to go a bit beyond the edges of what a reader will want, to avoid holes. That means you should have stubs up already about barely-notable people who are in the news. That provides a meeting spot with a talk page for people to discuss or build the actual article. If in a year the article didn't get any traction and the person is out of the news cycle, delete it.

Wiki is for its users, and that means as casual editors, not just the dedicated editors who think they own it. That means that the rules for casuals have to be quite relaxed in enforcement.
>that the next ad mascot will be written in JavaScript

The horror....
and what are your qualifications?
One thing you may not have considered is the shape of the orbit of the debris. While the orbit of the aggregated debris pre-disassembly was likely mostly circular, debris that heads upward (or downward) post-disassembly will end up in an eliptic orbit, which will mean it spends some time above the previous orbit and some time below.

While the time above raises risk of impacting objects in higher orbit, the time below has increased atmospheric drag and reduces the time in orbit. The higher the apogee, the lower the perogee, but I haven't looked at detailed analysis.
Own your presence on the web, don't be a sharecropper on Medium (or Blogger.com, or Wordpress.com, or any other plantation).

I used to run my own Wordpress blog (don't recommend it any more because of the security issues), now it's a Hugo blog hosted on AWS Cloudfront. Costs me about $4 to $5 a month to run.
My team ran a desktop fleet for a few years. Power supplies were a top 3 failure component, and tended to go in waves when an OEM got screwed by counterfeit capacitors or other components.

My guess was that bad power was a contributor to many other issues, but the nature of the SLO was such that more complex issues resulted in a device swap.
Also, any kind of dirty environment drives higher AFRs.
pg_upgrade is the way to do in-place upgrade between major versions:

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/pgupgrade.html
I am Dennis Stephens from Canada. This is my website: https://dennis-stephens.vercel.app.
You can check my resume here.
I am full stack & Blockchain developer having 6 years of experience.
Now I am looking for a new job opportunity or team or task!
Regards!
Congratulations to the Crystal devs on another release! It's been great to see the compiler and standard library continue to mature.
Data breaches can happen to anyone, but what the original comment implies is that Google would compromise your security, or at least your privacy, for profit. Its main profit venue is tracking people and selling ads.
I get it, Russians really believe as you do about western societies, that somehow Biden controls FoxNews from behind the shadows, or that somehow Trump banned himself on Twitter. But if you think about the cases where government, social media, and traditional media have come into conflict, centralized government control really doesn’t add up.
> who hates India, the current government and probably himself as well ... As someone who dislikes both Meta and The Wire, this is a source of great entertainment.

As an American it's fascinating how the tone of HN completely changes whenever the merits of cancel culture, the Internet Archive, or the current government of India comes up. It's an odd list.
There's a CPPCon talk - which I'm sure somebody else can remember and link - where Matt explains how this started. IIRC He was initially wondering whether C++ iterators are actually the same price as the C-style for loops you'd once have used instead with an index counting up or a pointer increasing. If it was slower then in Matt's industry that's useless, but if it's the same speed then the improved clarity of what you mean is valuable.

Obviously the results will be identical but because the iterators look fancy (and are easier to think about) maybe there's some object getting constructed, it might be a lot heavier - right? Nope, same machine code. Matt initially did this much more manually, the Godbolt web site is just that same idea getting further enriched over time.

This is even more striking for something like Rust's iterators that don't look at all like it's just the C-style for loop, there's a call to make the iterator IntoIterator::into_iter() and then repeated calls to its next() method, sounds expensive - but nope, once again the optimiser can see what's going on here and emit the same machine code. Having a tool like Godbolt to confirm (or sometimes refute) the belief that these things are actually the same is really useful, as even after confirming that optimisation is needed if the proposed "optimisation" doesn't change the machine code it wasn't an optimisation, just making the program needlessly harder to understand.
Transient cell-in-cell formation underlies tumor resistance to immunotherapy
Thanks for the email. But I think it should be fine.

I haven’t said anything that could be exploited by bad actors. As for competitors, there are no competitors in integrity. The entire industry goes to great lengths to share knowledge on what works and what doesn’t. We all win when we combat abuse well.
I'm not saying that this isn't a great way for people to familiarize themselves with basic Unix shell commands. That said, why would you want to teach this to kids?
Most protocols atop IP have the concept of ports- i.e. TCP or UDP.
Ask HN: Has GitHub stars become a gamed metric?
It seems that FOSS and “open core” has become a hard requirement to gain street cred, especially for dev tools.

Businesses and VC-backed projects are doing it, but they need to monetize, somehow. For established businesses, they have lots of resources and sharing a wide range of tools that are orthogonal to their core business, and low risk. For startups, they go with the open core model for their flagship product.

I’ve noticed some VC backed startups having thousands of GitHub stars but very little online presence, sometimes with zero references on HackerNews. Also, merge requests go abandoned or closed when you dig deeper. Has fraud detection proof bots for GitHub become more prevalent and accessible?
Then perhaps that’s a failing of the linked article to adequately convey her contribution, not an indication of anything else.

Same for the other authors without a Wikipedia entry. Their absences don’t indicate that Phelps too shouldn’t have an entry. Instead, for a significant discovery, it perhaps means that other people are similarly lacking in recognition.

Is your point that she shouldn’t have a Wikipedia entry, or that it’s absence was not necessarily related to her being a woman, or something else entirely?
Im currently thinking of purchasing a Synology NAS that comes with BTRFS. Just wondering, do you happen to know if BTRFS also requires ECC RAM to function correctly?
There's a bit of a difference between having a process enacted by the government which requires registration and assessment of candidate draftees and a process (the US used a lottery) to select draftees, and just randomly grabbing people off the street as Russia appears to be doing.

Not defending the draft, just pointing out that Russia's process today is not remotely close to what the US did or other countries currently do today.
I think GP is talking about DDR5 "on-die ECC".
When insurers get on this you know there's a problem. Our insurers void our building insurance if anyone parks an EV in the underground car park...
Yeah it was pretty good. For a while there the top search results of Medium articles were generally worth reading for a topic. Good UX.
I'm not sure it's so clear. "Using private data" to set prices is hardly nefarious on its own, even if the result is higher prices. After all, "price stickiness" is a well known phenomena in the economics literature (and it can lead to sub-optimal allocation of resources). Maybe this is just a way to make prices less sticky.

On the other hand, if the system recommends keeping units vacant, that does start to suggest that it is enabling landowners to take advantage of monopolistic pricing power. Yet higher vacancy rates could actually be socially optimal as well. A similar phenomena occurs in the movie theater business. Theater owners often price tickets such that the "vacancy" rates (empty seats) are quite high. However, a law that required pricing tickets low enough to fill all seats would reduce the return on equity in the industry so much that investment in the theater industry would plummet, vastly reducing the number of theater seats available available to fill consumer demand in the medium to long term.
this is one school of thought, for sure.
React has a self perpetuating marketing machine. From boot camp courses to YouTube how-tos and frequency plof appearance in job description requirements, people end up hiring React developers who want to build the sites in React.
And of course, here's her Wikipedia entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jess_Wade
I think I’ll be fine.

My reasoning is two fold - I haven’t shared anything that could be exploited by anyone. And second, Meta and others in the industry try to share information about how their integrity efforts work so we can learn from each other.
> I often find myself frustrated by the "billionaires are bad" argument because I interpret it as an argument against rewarding performance and productivity. It is objectively true that different individuals have differing ability and desire to contribute to society. Incentivizing and rewarding productivity over idleness will maximise productivity.

When individuals hold massive amounts of wealth, they are de-facto no longer bound by the laws that bind the ordinary people, since they can influence the very politicians that are supposed to incentivize and reward productivity over idleness. When a human has some kind of power, they will do anything not to lose it - that's a fundamental property of humans.

"Person has money, therefore person brought value" makes sense in theory, but in practice it seems that the most effective ways to obtain massive amounts of wealth contain fair amounts of corruption, fraud and swindle. There isn't a single billionaire in history that hasn't been eventually revealed to have done terrible things to gain, keep or increase their wealth, most of which could be argued to bring more harm to the society than the value that was brought in the first place. John D. Rockefeller and the destruction of the public transportation system comes to mind as an example.

> However, I don't think that wealth re-distribution (taxes, etc) is the right answer. That seems to be penalising the player, not the game.

The point of the video is not that we should re-distribute the wealth of the billionaires more - it's that we should stop them from not paying taxes that are already in place, by closing off the various loopholes that allow them to have their cake and eat it too.
With all respect for Terry and being fully aware that the outrageous parts of behavior were almost definitely a result of his mental illness - no one in their right mind would intentionally try to associate their product with him in marketing.

It isn't about "how dare he participate in society" (which is irrelevant, as he is, sadly, not alive anymore). You just simply dont associate your product in public with someone who talks about "cia glowies in a van outside of my house, trying to bait me with a handgun and an underage child" or records a video of themselves calling a black person outside an N-word with hard "r" (and then gets hit by that person).

Again, sad story for Terry, and I genuinely feel compassion for the man. He clearly had a brilliant mind trapped in his head, but his mental illness took over it entirely. To the point where he became literally about as marketable as the Unabomber, and probably even less. It isn't insensitive to say that his behavior (regardless of the mental illness) makes it impossible to attach his likeness to your product in a positive way.
Remember that you want to sell your product, but your clients just want to resolve the problems they have.

So don't look at it as selling - reframe it internally as wanting to find businesses where you can genuinely help them and resolve some of their issues, and then work with the business to solve the problem they have.
To prevent misuse, as with Designer and Image Creator, Microsoft says it’s implemented filters to reject DALL-E 2 prompts from Azure OpenAI Service customers that violate content policy. The company also claims it’s integrated techniques to prevent DALL-E 2 from creating images of religious objects and celebrities, plus objects commonly used to try to trick the system into generating sexual or violent content. And Microsoft says it’s added models that remove AI-generated images appearing to contain adult, gore and other types of “inappropriate” content.

And this is why I would never sign up for something like this. I've been using stable diffusion a bit, for a completely benign commercial / research application that has nothing to do with anything related to people or remotely NSFW. When I first started using it I was regularly triggering the NSFW filter, with false positives, that after removing the filter I confirmed were sfw and looked like the rest or what I was generating. Adults don't want or need to have their hands held because of some SV activists opinion about what "harms" we might encounter. That kind of filtering has no place in a tool like this
What does it have to do with anything tho?
I mean you could fork Android but its Upstream can still be killed, it wont be maintained by google anymore. You seem to be mixing things.
yes but there's real value in exploration. I haven't touched c or assembly for a long time. here's a cold read.

push rbp

this is going to take the contents of rbp and push it onto the top of the stack - this will probably also change the stack pointer

mov rbp, rsp

move goes left <-, like a = 5, not 5 = a.
so, copy the updated stack pointer into rbp

mov DWORD PTR [rbp-4], edi

now, I'm not 100% sure, but I believe this guy puts edi just under the value we pushed to the top of the stack

mov eax, DWORD PTR [rbp-4]

Take that value, and put it into eax, I'm not 100% sure why it's not just mov eax edi.

imul eax, eax

integer multiply, this is the part that does the double.

pop rbp

restore rbp (which we messed with)

ret

and we're done.

there are at least three holes in my understanding - but those three are not _that_ hard to track down.

1, does the stack pointer actually auto increment? (I think it does)
2, imul overflow and setting sign flags and such. - that shouldn't be hard to run down.

3, what is the c calling convention? it looks like the argument is top of stack, but also in edi - is that shuffling really needed? I think there's a bucket of implicit behavior there that's kinda scary.

I would _hope_ unless linking to a library, whatever called this, just did the imul eax eax.

My understanding may be deeply flawed, but explaining my assumptions and my understanding does two things.

1, it helps me learn.

2, it helps others re-evaluate their assumptions and possibly see from a different viewpoint.

I'm not saying spam compiler lists. But a clear and well thought out question can certainly advance discussion. It forces people to formalize their assumptions.
rdpintqogeogsaa hit the nail on the head.

Linus uses a Threadripper machine which supports ECC, and non-ecc.

Most Mobos support non-ecc and maybe ECC if it's AMD and the supplier wired it up. (ASUS and someone else I can't recall seem to do so, Gigabyte does not appear to)
https://nitter.it/jordanschnyc/status/1580889341265469440
Apple's "cooperation" with authoritarian governments tends to only go so far as it needs to in order for the next iPhone to come out on time and in sufficient supply. Otherwise Apple bends heaven and earth to engineer their devices to be as secure as they can make them, even against state authorities.

That said, if you live in China, you probably don't want to sync your stuff to iCloud. Not because Apple doesn't want to protect your data, but more because you can't trust anything in any data centers that are physically on Chinese soil.

But let's get real. If you're in mainland China and the authorities decide they need to confiscate your phone, you're already fscked.
I would put Listen on top of the list before anything in sales. The colder the sales get, the harder it gets and the better you need to listen. Give your product away, for free to each and every SME you know. Demo it, let them use it, and get many, many feedback rounds.

Also, look at other angles to approaching market segments. Door to door sales in non primary products just isn’t feasible at scale. The conversion rate is too small. Remember that many SME pretty much shit on their software, but they got it via their IT-support, or bookkeeper/ accountant or professional association. Those are angles to sell that could get you a better effort to conversion ratio.
This reminds me of management consulting.

The consultants come in, recommend you fire 10% of your workforce, and when you pull the trigger you say, sorry McKinsey made me do it! Likewise, the recommendations made by the software are non-binding, but if pushed you say “well the algorithm said so…”

In either case, it’s the c-suite/property manager making the call. But it seems that we like a measure of distance between ourselves and unpleasant decisions. The algorithm/well-groomed 20-somethings provide a kind of plausible deniability.

The answer is, of course, a ton more housing.
Yes. People add themselves for self promotion which is at worst useless bandwidth but sometimes in cases of fraud/deception. I have seen cranks add pages about themselves as if they are experts on a subject which they are definitely not. That is harmful because you can mislead people since part of the appeal is the effect this has on google search results and the authoritative appearance of Wikipedia can mislead people.
> The server returns HTML

So back to ASP.NET WebForms update panels?
also - use nvm or n to switch versions quickly on your machine
I thought moving the size slider would switch to icon versions designed with less/more detail to accommodate extreme sizes, but this is cool and since it's OSS someone might make a PR for that at some point!
Has any Blue Origin launch achieved orbit yet?
Makes me remember Donna Strickland, a Nobel prize winning physicist, whose Wikipedia article was rejected multiple times, saying she was not notable enough to have one.
Here’s mine (just finished a landscaping project!): https://obviy.us