skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I-5 craps the bed on a fairly regular basis, particularly on game day at the SODO or UW stadiums (and all bets are off if there are multiple games scheduled for one day). It may be 45 minutes to SeaTac on light rail, but it is always 45 minutes on light rail, whereas travel times on I-5 can vary widely depending on congestion, accidents, etc.

Some trips are much faster. The Capitol Hill extension was wildly popular, because pre-opening the surface traffic could easily take 20-40 minutes from Capitol Hill to either downtown or UW. Now, it's five minutes to either, and the surface traffic has also adjusted accordingly somewhat since less people are congesting the roads with cars and rideshares.

In general the highway network in the area is super fragile because there are only 4 major highways in the area (I-5, 520, I-405, I-90) and few parallel arterials. I suspect that East Link will also become wildly popular, as will the northern and southern extensions, because of predictable travel times. Already many people take the buses that get stuck in traffic that these light rail lines will replace. And it will also help alleviate the issues with the commuter buses, such as there not being enough bus drivers to operate the scheduled services.

The light rail isn't perfect, but few things are. Modern metro construction in the US has mostly gone sideways worse than light rail systems.
You make that claim with a high level of confidence, but have you actually read the contract in place between Meta and the advertiser?
New file and storage options for Windows Server announced at Ignite
Reproducible man-db Databases
Self publishing on your own server is probably simpler than understanding the terms of service of a third party host.

Since you are clearly already self-censoring for fear of algoritmic retaliation, you should consider the time impact of that as well as the impacts to the quality of your writing.

One approach is to self-publish, then "syndicate" to ephemeral places like medium, blogger, livejournal, GeoCities, or whatever the kids are using these days.
Its clear where the knowhow was lifted from it doesnt matter that if the final image is somewhat unique (almost every image is).
Canadian culture IS mediocre. Everyone's ambition here is to do what everyone else does. Restaurants are mostly the same. Businesses don't innovate, they merely do what someone else who was already successful did.

The parent may not have elaborated the reasons perfectly but everyone here knows it.
That's actually a different use case than ours. We only use it to run the builder and app services (which can use a bunch of resources), while keeping the editor/IDE tooling local.

That said, we have developers using VS Code, JetBrains, as well as Vim. The Mutagen-based workflow works well with all of them.
I’ve learned a handful of languages over the years, it was fairly straightforward to reason about all the c-likes (java, php, js, c#, etc), and others (python, tcl). They all have quirks and unique pros/cons, but it was mostly a matter of applying familiar ideas to a new environment/syntax.

But by a large margin nothing melted my brain more than learning a pure functional language (xquery, in my case). To have to think about programming in a completely different way was extremely beneficial. I highly recommend it, given the chance.
> OpenAI Codex was trained on publicly available source code and natural language, so it works for both programming and human languages. The GitHub Copilot extension sends your comments and code to the GitHub Copilot service, and it relies on context, as described in Privacy below - i.e., file content both in the file you are editing, as well as neighboring or related files within a project. It may also collect the URLs of repositories or file paths to identify relevant context. The comments and code along with context are then used by OpenAI Codex to synthesize and suggest individual lines and whole functions.

"How Does Copilot Work"
Web 3.0 – The Great Con
If they're that trivial and valueless, Microsoft should have no problem coming up with their own training sets instead of stealing them en masse from the public.

If I create something, I get to define the terms of its use, reproduction, distribution, etc. "Value" plays no part in whether someone can appropriate and distribute that creation without permission from the creator.
Not safe for work, but one example I saw going around:

https://twitter.com/ebkim00/status/1579485164442648577

Not sure if this was fed the original image as an input or not.

Also seen a couple cases where people explicitly trained a network to imitate an artist's work, like the deceased Kim Jung Gi.
You can check some good looking free Wordpress themes from Anders Noren
https://andersnoren.se/teman/
Not yet. We do support file sync though (https://motif.land/blog/syncing-text-files-using-yjs-and-the...) so you can use your mobile Markdown editor of choice.
The point is that React has become the IBM of web app frameworks, in the "nobody got fired for using IBM" sense.

Your CTO, PM, frontend dev and DevOps people likely all have React experience under their belt. So it isn't surprising if React ends up becoming the framework of choice, simply because it will likely be faster to start with.
> It seems utilitarian in nature

That has no bearing on copyright.
The highest leverage is not which books, but who to meet. Find people you can discuss these topics with and that will push you're thinking the most.

For this forum, I'm assuming you are looking for math / science books (otherwise I'd recommend the Talmud, Bible or Quran), I'd recommend Real Analysis by Charles Chapman Pugh or Surely you're joking Mr Feynman (+ Feynman Lectures on Physics)
> So obviously the source of the error is one or more third parties, not Microsoft, and it's obviously impossible for Microsoft to be responsible in advance for what other people claim to license.

No. Look at the insane YouTube copystrike situation. Why shouldn't Microsoft be held to the same standards?
> If you asked every developer on earth to implement FizzBuzz, how many actually different implementations would you get?

Thousands at least. Some of which would actually work.
In order to state anything which they know to be true, they must first prove it to themselves. But if it is something which cannot be proven, then of course they cannot know it to be true, and consequently they cannot then honestly state it.
What do you love about the kernel design? I’m a Linux dude so it’s foreign to me.
> Nevertheless, the output of the hardware RNGs provided by the Intel or AMD CPUs can be used in a reasonably secure way if the supposedly random values are never used directly, but they are passed through a cryptographic hash, e.g. SHA-256. Even SHA-1 is completely adequate for this special purpose

Why would you go to any of this trouble and not just XOR the output of RDRAND into the starting seed (based on hardware entropy) for your PRNG (/dev/urandom)? Even if it turns out that Intel is providing a single static value (like all zeros) to every device ever, that's not going to help them figure out the starting seed if the rest of the entropy is from a sufficiently secure source.
That’s just an aesthetic choice, and C doesn’t give you many options. Structs for the pointer and limit might be nice, but that wouldn’t be a huge improvement.

The truth is that this isn’t really a “common” function; most programs will call it (or one of its siblings) just a few times for input and output. You’re write that code once and then never worry about it again.

Leaving all that aside, if you think you can do better, feel free to write a wrapper library and prove it.
I suspect a video of you playing literally anything on the cello--even an improvised song or a random motif--is likely to get reported as a copyright violation when uploaded to YouTube.
You're going to chip in, right? And help fundraise? Because it would take millions of dollars to mount a successful legal attack over this.
On one hand, you're absolutely right that we hate to reject people in person. I mean, heck, I avoid entering small gift shops in tourist towns if I don't have cash on me, as I hate letting them down in their expectation of sale!

At the same time, I've learned to never ever ever engage salespeople in person; I've been conditioned to assume they're 100% scam. The friendliest most honest face offering to clean my ducts or redo my driveway, the smiley nerdy guy offering discounts on internet from local Bell, the supremely trust worthy kids asking for your support of charity... or to your point the guy who's "in the neighbourhood, and can give me a discount on the roof since machinery is already here" -- literally every one of them I would read in the news few weeks later as the latest local fraud scheme.

With heavy heart, I reject all cold calls & cold visits. I may ask for their website and details to check if they're legit, and possibly maybe reach back at a stable phone or email address. But, I'm said to say, I've been thoroughly conditioned by the environment to reject cold-calls :<
I know you were intending for the opposite, but you make her work sound interesting and unique. I’d love to read a work by someone who can find shopping in supermarkets extraordinary and can convey that feeling to the reader.
Do you really think scrolling through TikTok has the same effect on someone's brain as listening to the radio?
> Employers can and do fire for a broad range of reasons, including suspicion without evidence.'

Employers can, but those that are at the size of the WSJ probably don't. The bad PR, reputational damage and legal damages of an unfounded firing, isn't worth it.
Nvm, this whole post is just whipping up attention before he posts. It is factually untrue that the usage of slurs results in an automatic and incontestable ban, and I would be surprised if OP did not bother to do any basic searching before inventing this boogeyman.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33227936
Medium, Forbes, Nautilus, etc. It's rare that I read anything off of those sites that isn't a waste of time. The only exception might be posts from companies that use medium as their official blog.
It's the difference between a revenue stream and a sum of assets under management. The $50B isn't liquid and can't be used to distribute bonuses. The yearly $75,000 however can be distributed among admissions office admin with impunity, for the labor of accepting file uploads.
CE itself has support for llvm-mca.
Sounds like an issue - I've filed something to take a look: https://github.com/compiler-explorer/compiler-explorer/issue...
New Pacific island rises after underwater volcanic blast
There is always a current pain in every business, or they would not need employees and could replace all operations with AI and robots. It's the promise given by the comfort of removing the pain and the increased power and acceleration of their business is what business people want.

Marketing is explaining the problem and educating about the solution.

Advertising is raising awareness.

Sales is convincing individual customers to spend money. This is difficult to scale but is sometimes necessary.

When possible, automate sales and marketing in pleasant, self-service SaaS apps and work legitimate influencers to advertise. Specialized B2B Fortune 500 solutions usually need sales. SMB B2B apps usually shouldn't try to scale using salespeople because the ROI isn't there.
This is silly but typing "poop" in the search bar and hitting enter gives a "Page not found" -- maybe the search auto complete drop-down can let you know that a word isn't in the thesaurus and not try to redirect on enter.
2M “subscribed” users to a subreddit is about 10% or 200,000 daily viewers with about 1% of those commenting and 0.1% posting so 2,000 comments and 200 posts per day. Some subs will be more
or less but that’s the magnitudes we’re talking about.

The equivalent situation assuming mods review every comment would be a subreddit with 1 billion users. If mods are only reviewing reports which is some small percentage of comments then adjust accordingly.
May I suggest the inverse - an icon with a link? That way the original "double-click and copy word" use case gets preserved
Fwiw Devesh Kumar has to be in on the fabrication given that he provided an impossible story as to why the email screenshots they initially posted showed 2021 (impossible because the day of the week didn’t match the displayed date, indicating the screenshot was fabricated).

It also takes a special level of suspension of disbelief to think that Andy Stone somehow writes emails in Indian English and that XCheck gives privileges to take down content from other users.
Yeah right like he was saying to sneak up behind the chef quietly lol
Fair use does not make a work public domain; it merely helps the creator of the derivative work defend their case in court. But neither the original nor the derivative becomes public domain after a successful fair use defense.

Not a lawyer, of course, but I think slapping the Getty logo on a work claiming "fair use" and then releasing the work under public domain would be a case of misrepresentation, because Getty still has a copyright claim on your work. Regardless of the copyright status, it's still a clear trademark violation to me.
Everyone’s favourite psychology theory isn’t all it’s cracked up to be
And at 200 in 84k, the percent of affected individuals are unlikely to affect aggregate data in any practical way (if those numbers even apply to peds, which I'm skeptical of). Nor would there be any actionable solution.
> If you asked every developer on earth to implement FizzBuzz, how many actually different implementations would you get?

Does it matter? If you examined every copyright lawsuit on earth over code, how many of them would actually be over FizzBuzz?
Thank you very much for putting all the effort into this project. It is a great step towards more secure computing in general, and you earned respect for that.
If you click "show binary" that's pretty much what we do. Here's a link doing so, and also running `elfdump -a` on the linked output: https://godbolt.org/z/9EcxhedK4
The version they (and their partner agencies) use internally is even better. Some of these additional plugins will likely never see the light of day publicly as they're either too tied into internal systems or otherwise deemed too sensitive, but they're very impressive.
> Is it really a shock that an institution designed largely by Stalin (although FDR's idea) isn't fit for purpose?

It was an evolution of the league of nations actually.

Considering that during the last 77 years none of the 30 biggest economies in the world fought each other (I think there are minor exceptions like Argentina-Britain over Falklands/Malvinas), I think UN isn't that bad.

> Time to hit restart, and perhaps not to include the autocracies and miscreants.

And who gets to decide who those are? Also, what is the purpose of a club that doesn't include all the nations? It's just an alliance.
It's going to vary based on whether you have a BMC or not. If you do, it's better to disable all the OS EDAC stuff and let the BMC handle it.

Otherwise, a good starting point would be to boot linux with `mce=0` so it panics ASAP upon uncorrectable errors.

In Ubuntu, there are the rasdaemon, mcelog, and edac-utils packages.
Most kids did not suffer significantly if they got Covid. The vast majority of the kids who got Covid had just mild symptoms. I'm not saying there were no kids who had it bad, but they formed a very small minority, and could not have dragged down the average ACT score.
The "Joe Rando" example is of playing a song that predates the copyright system.
Oh that's a good idea. Since I'm already loading all possible words in the JS, I don't even need to point to a 404 or "term not found" page, it can be right there that I display something.

I'll add that soon.
There’s a finite number of ways to implement a working FizzBuzz (or anything else) in any given language, that aren’t substantially similar, is my point. At least without introducing pointless code for the explicit purpose of making it look different.
"But we certainly want to do analyses on why grades are dropping."

Yes, and there's tons of that research out there if you care to look for it.
I don’t know of any examples of images being wholly recreated, but it’s certainly possible to use the name of some living artists to get work in their style. In those cases, it seems like not such a leap to say that the AI has obviously seen that artist’s work and that the output is a derivative work. (The obvious counterargument is that this is the same as a human looking at an artist’s work and aping the style.)
The same rationale applies to any other simple code block, as I elaborated on.
I was sympathetic that they were getting played when the first story came out but after they doubled down on it not once but twice, and seeing the “evidence” they’re putting out, it appears that at least one of their employees is in on the fabrication and regardless the whole outlet is willing to ignore basic journalistic standards in reporting this story.
And user netch on stack overflow wrote this which explains more:

notice also there is a 128-byte space ("red zone") before %rsp that keeps its contents between function calls but preserved by OS during interrupts. So, very temporary values (between function calls) can be used with negative offsets to %rsp. Not all compilers utilize this.

About this code (note opposite order of register movement - there are two main styles of displaying x86 assembly code):

pushq %rbp
movq %rsp, %rbp
subq $16, %rsp

the comment was:

Compiler allocates some space for local values on function enter. That's why it subtracts value from %rsp on enter. This doesn't depend on whether %rbp is used as frame pointer. After that, this place is used with positive offsets upon %rsp. Also, if this function calls another one, %rsp shall be aligned on 16-byte boundary for each call, so, in that case compiler shall subtract 8 from %rsp on each enter.
I think this is mostly about Twitter's refusal to censor on behalf of the Indian government; see eg https://www.vice.com/en/article/5d3bmn/twitter-censorship-in...

The OP is a very strong BJP supporter (see comment history), but even so it's a weird take.
Well copyright and intellectual property are made-up concepts anyway.

It’s only logical that people twist and bend the rules.

Anyway, this kind of bs will go on until people start bringing companies to court over this.

I still don’t get why don’t lawyers start offering their services for a cut of the damages… there probably is good money to be made by suing companies that put copyright-infringing ai in production.
Makes sense. If no student discloses their SAT then the university would have to assume that any given student achieved the average SAT score. If you're a student who got an above average SAT it's therefore in your interests to disclose your score.

Although these incentives should theoretically cause everyone to voluntarily disclose their SAT scores.
> We built a filter to help detect and suppress the rare instances where a GitHub Copilot suggestion contains code that matches public code on GitHub. You have the choice to turn that filter on or off during setup. With the filter on, GitHub Copilot checks code suggestions with its surrounding code for matches or near matches (ignoring whitespace) against public code on GitHub of about 150 characters. If there is a match, the suggestion will not be shown to you. We plan on continuing to evolve this approach and welcome feedback and comment.

From the FAQ https://github.com/features/copilot/
I tend to agree but also acknowledge that TV and radio did have engagement feedback loops. Viewer numbers and focus groups were/are used to “optimize” the content. Those are obviously not as extremely personalized as what’s available in modern forms of media but I struggle to identify a specific tipping point at where such feedback loops become problematic.
As a high volume podcast consumer, I find it interesting that US casts are pretty much all following a completely ad based model, while German ones are much more subscription/donation based.

And yes, paying for good journalism is inevitable if you want quality. Just, if the crowd picks up the tab, nobody needs to listen to ads.
The Russian Space Program Is Falling Back to Earth
Censoring the N word is racist?
I am curious why you called this out. Is there a social reason I should not use such specific examples in the future? In my mind, giving a concrete example that the reader has some familiarity with help them to develop the story in their mind.

For example, one could misinterpret the neighbor as having the same socio-economic status, making it far less clear how losing the house but gaining an equitable amount of money causes hardship. And blacks specifically have been targeted by such policies in the past, so it's a lot easier to imagine how other social policies align to make becoming un-housed even more problematic for that neighbor.
Python code formatters comparison: Black, autopep8 and YAPF
When it comes to solving a problem, I want it to emit whatever solves the problem.

When it comes to being an AI that understands coding concepts, I don't want it to regurgitate code verbatim.

When it comes to being a product, I don't want it to plagiarize.
I'm now picturing moving into an apartment and surreptitiously installing an extra layer of drywall. Will the landlord notice the rooms are all 2" smaller?
And my point is you don't have lawsuits over one simple code block.
is the actual list anywhere?
People think React or similar SPA libraries are the way to do frontend development, so all frontend development seems to be React at this point.

"When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail" is the problem. Another new library / framework will not solve this.

Frontend dev should go for the bare minimum when designing web sites, only introduce libraries as they're needed -- and really think about whether they're really needed or not. They need to ask some questions like:

- Maybe you can roll your own specialized solution that'll be smaller and faster than a general solution?
- Does the thing you're working on need to be an SPA or does a good old multi-page web site be enough for your use case?
- If you need parts of your website to be interactive, can you only update that part (the "islands" approach) by hand instead of introducing a dependency to do that?

There is a lot of complexity going on in our field right now and not enough people seem to care about that. The complexity is needlessly inflating our application / web page sizes and reducing performance.
Are you required to pay for the plate of sausages if you don't eat any?
I’m curious how to tell if an icon pack passed any kind of i18n testing.

If I remember correctly, Material Design team did lots of i18n research for their icon pack. I assume Bootstrap icons also score well, owing to the diversity of contributors (although, I’m surprised RTL landed only recently).