skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I haven't read his papers but isn't a fundamental mechanism of uncertainty basic to the very real and measured phenomena like the Casimir effect? Objects and "space" themselves appear to have a limit on their certainty of themselves, so yes, the butterfly is uncertain about its wings, as well as the existence or levels of energy concerning them. That's why we have "particles" appearing out of "nothing".
It's probably posted without permission, but I don't think there's a strong incentive for rights holders to pursue copyright enforcement.

Screenplays are often meant for circulation, albeit in smaller circles within Hollywood and film industry personnel (producer and director mainly). The money is recouped when the finished film screens.

Of course, you can always buy the screenplay for personal reading to support their creators. It's often on Amazon. I used to read some at my library.
I assure you, the parties that tech dad workaholics are throwing in the peninsula are far more gauche than "legendary" compared to the Project X like shenanigans across the city, town, and east bay. There's a reason the intro to the Silicon Valley series is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyYI957ge4c

For literally legendary Bay Area parties, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid_Tests
> I will be developing a blog for SEO purposes

Your blog will suck and it won't sell. People are getting really tired of this.

I'll stray from the usual advice and recommend what worked for me: brutal, disinterested honesty. People are weary of hucksters, and will sign blank cheques to the guy who offers straightforward, unbiased advice.

I've had enough of sales early on, and chose to be a honest broker. This guy wrote a great piece about it: https://tedgioia.substack.com/p/how-i-became-the-honest-brok...
It doesn't matter if it's "luxury" or not - they need to build and they just don't.
The sheer scale is what makes it worse.

Because you are right: a few, and a small time artist can fight. Hundreds and thousands of copies, or millions, and even Disney struggles. That's why Disney would go after the model itself; it scales better.
The article well explains this downside of user reports, so I don't see what this comment adds. It does not answer my question. The article also describes problems of not acting on them, so the conclusion requires more than just finding a negative.
This doesn’t at all address the primary issue, which is one of licensing.

Is it a valid defense against copyright infringement to say “we don’t know where we got it, maybe someone else copied it from you first?”

If someone violated the copyright of a song by sampling too much of it and released it in the public domain (or failed to claim it at all), and you take the entire sample from them, would that hold up in a legal setting? I doubt it.
Hypothetically, do you think you should be able to work for, say, Facebook and Snap at the same time? Because that's a good example of what this convention (rule?) is for. There's a lot of company 'property' that you'd be able to transfer between the two, and I think it is their right to ask you not to do that, because it could be damaging to one or both in a variety of ways.
It is relevant to the objective existence of a problem though, as well as the magnitude of the importance of the problem (importance may vary substantially per instance of censorship).
Stable Diffusion, Whisper and GPT-3 combine for a futuristic AI design assistant
I think it is expected that when commenting on your own article, you add a note to each comment to indicate you are the author. Enjoyed the article. I love it when “obsolete” technologies are used to build great software.
How's that ironic or relevant? Most scientists do not receive awards.
And my advice is to read and live!

One of the reasons Roald Dahl was such a great writer is his life experiences. Read his books Boy and Solo.
People put unenforceable clauses in contracts all the time. And I think you're confusing "unethical" with "unlawful".
Can you clarify what you mean when you describe Github as an LLM maintainer? What LLM does github maintain?
I think you’re missing the key part which is that this is delivered over a single GraphQL subscription.

So as new data is added to the table, hasura automatically pushes it to the client via the Websocket subscription.

No refetch needed.
For me, it’s rather probable that advanced civilizations will collapse or/and kill themselves. It happened with civilizations on earth, it certainly can happen with other civilizations in the universe. Destroying other makes no sense because the risk is much higher than the reward. There is more than plenty of resources out there for any possible civilization.
Coders use monosoace fonts so things align.
> I want there to be trust so we can both grow the company together.

Who are you talking to here? Surely not a wage labourer?
Copyright only covers the expressive parts and not the utilitarian parts.

Here is some reading material for those of you who disagree with reality:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstraction-Filtration-Compari...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idea–expression_distinction

https://h2o.law.harvard.edu/cases/5004

https://www.loeb.com/en/insights/publications/2020/04/johann...
Somebody else could build a centralized trading platform, and if you use that, it will be cheaper for all parties.

Whether web3 becomes a thing is not anybody's guess. Anybody who thinks about it clearly can easily conclude that it will never be a thing except among scammers and their marks.
Your stance, as described, doesn't make any sense. You're being willfully obtuse here. Equal treatment would mean that users are treated the same by the company. They are not, in the same situation.
Don't ever judge a pilot screenplay -- those circulate sometimes for many years before a show gets produced, and modified heavily before a show is picked up.

On the other hand, episodes after the pilot would usually be shooting scripts.

Obviously final episodes don't always match shooting scripts, but the difference is usually in making cuts or slight reorderings, not adding new material.
It works on Firefox (Mac) for me
> Are all crimes, right? Banks will take your consumer money (provider management does get more complicated) for gambling and porn these days

Not necessarily. For example, PayPal has recently introduced "acceptable use policy" where they can freeze your account without you violating the law. Banks also have done the same for being "racist", "sexist", "anti-vaxx" etc. All of those things are perfectly legal in the US. So your assertion that only illegal activities require use of crypto is false.

And that's before we get to the fact that just because something is "illegal" doesn't mean it's good to have this banned. Pretty sure the ongoing Iranian protests are illegal.
I notice it has openai integration. What is it about?
This is a good example of sealioning.

(I kid)
"And thinking about how to do it."

Essentially you can't. Multiple other factors have changed that would affect grades.

If you strictly want intelligence and not just grades, then you'll have to identify kids that had recent intelligence tests before the pandemic and compare them to others. This is problematic because types of intelligence can vary, so some areas might not be covered by the tests. In general, few kids recieve IQ tests and so there's likely to be observation bias with a higher number of kids being tested for some reason. Finally, it's unlikely you could track pre-/post-infection since kids haven't typically been testing every week and mild to asymptomatic cases are fairly common I'm children.

Best case, you can do very small studies on an individual level without control groups, essentially individual case studies. Even if you can, it's not going to answer the questions related to this article/thread.
> Modern machine learning systems are not based on biological ... rules ... where you could uphold a principle of noncontradiction
What if we could expand our universe of potential candidates globally? Perhaps that could increase the number of viable cofounders by a factor of 10 or more.

Rather than starting from the obvious reasons why finding a good cofounder is hard, I’d love to hear how it could be easier.

Let’s explore the hard part of this problem. Ideas?
(This reply is written with the assumption that you're not putting in 80 hour weeks, but rather juggling multiple companies during a normal workday).

Because in a lot of software engineering jobs we are given a lot of trust in managing our own workload and this is a breach of that trust.

If you have too much on your plate you can (in well functioning teams) tell your manager "hey, we can't do X" or "we need to push the deadline on Y" and that will be taken at face value. You won't be expected to put in 80 hour weeks just to get it done outside of extraordinary circumstances.

The flip side of that is that if you have so little work that you have time to work a whole other job you're meant to tell your manager "hey, I have spare cycles, what do we need to get done?".
If you're reporting hours, then it's fraud. Let's say you work 60 hours per week/splitting 30 hours between companies, but reporting 40 for both. You're technically shorting both companies for 10 hours of work each.

Even if you're reporting hours accurately and either of the companies finds out about it, then you'll probably be asked to leave regardless. This is true also if you're salaried.

If it's a government subcontract, you could end up going to jail for this.

Realistically the way to do this without problems would be to start your own consulting firm, and bid on work. Then you can work on two projects at once (as long as it's not hourly, something like a firm fixed price contract). You're basically on the hook for delivering it. The customer is not paying for your time, just the product you're delivering.

Edited to add:

In the salaried world you have a conflict of interest. You may choose a worse technique or technology for company A if it means you won't be able to give company B enough time. Or you might put in shittier code than needed to be created because you had to save time for company B.

Company A would say those extra hours could have been put to use for more testing, more robust coding, more robust unit testing.

Worse would be if you stole code that solved a problem for Company A and gave it to Company B and then took credit for it.

So it would be in the best interest for Company A and Company B to let you go if either found out about it.
This is amazing. To imagine a world where we could actually start to eradicate cancer...
Sure, but they didn't hire a plumber to fix their bathroom. They hired a plumber to spend 40 hours a week maintaining all the plumbing in a building. If you discover this plumber is only spending 20 hours fixing the most pressing issues, then instead of resolving lower priority issues or backlogged maintenance they instead went across the street to handle their most pressing issues, your naturally going to be upset.

If you want to work on a per-project basis there are plenty such consulting gigs out there, but with salaried work the general understanding is you are buying a chunk of someone's time rather than specific projects.
The take on Simenon is hardly outrageous. You would know if you had read the very long article the author wrote about Simenon two weeks ago for the publication of a new Simenon translation. Gopnik has a very interesting take on Simenon in which he mentions Ernaux.

But judging from your comments here, I don’t fancy you a New Yorker reader.

I think strangely the best way to understand what Ernaux is doing (which you obviously haven’t if that wasn’t clear enough) is to read Leiris introduction to L’age d’homme. She is mostly aiming for the same goal he is. She actually used a quote from him at the beginning of L’Evenement and I guess she didn’t restate what Leiris did because well he has already done so.
Pine64 Ox64: RISC-V SBC
I've heard of famous writers re-writing their favorite authors works by hand and I've fantasized about having more time to do that with my favorite tv shows/movies. For me I'd probably start with "Community" and see if I can absorb/train my neural net to be an iota as clever.
He walks past shelf upon which we see Chekhov's GUN . .
Was sugar in short supply during Prohibition, or do you mean 'sugar'?
This looks great! Thanks for the share!
Yes because I have generated files too that I can edit further, and need to send log files, screenshots etc to other people.
The book "Hands-on Rust" might be perfect. It sounds like it's about Rust, but it's moreso about how to build a Roguelike using the ECS pattern. https://pragprog.com/titles/hwrust/hands-on-rust/
I think you're the one confusing the two. Violating a unenforceable contract clause isn't unlawful, but is pretty much breaking a promise, which is definitely unethical.
The reason why it's easy to match Copilot results back to the original source is that the users are starting with prompts that match their public code, deliberately to cause prompt regurgitation.

Stable Diffusion actually has a similar problem. Certain terms that directly call up a particular famous painting by name - say, the Mona Lisa[0] - will just produce that painting, possibly tiled on top of itself, and it won't bother with any of the other keywords or phrases you throw at it.

The underlying problem is that the AI just outright forgets that it's supposed to create novel works when you give it anything resembling the training set data. If it was just that the AI could spit out training set data when you ask for it, I wouldn't be concerned[1], but this could also happen inadvertently. This would mean that anyone using Copilot to write production code would be risking copyright liability. Through the AI they have access to the entire training set, and the AI has a habit of accidentally producing output that's substantially similar to it. Those are the two prongs of a copyright infringement claim right there.

[0] For the record I was trying to get it to draw a picture of the Mona Lisa slapping Yoshikage Kira across the cheek

[1] Anyone using an AI system to "launder" creative works is still infringing copyright. AI does not carve a shiny new loophole in the GPL.
I'd go the Wikipedia way...50 data points doesn't look too many, so just a list would do it, maybe a spreadsheet...a few sums, voila...i wouldn't call it a data processing problem though
When machines were not online at the same time or with unreliable connectivity. I've managed to never loose data because I have staggered backups so I could always revert to the in-between version.
I’ve never had complaints from employers when my second job benefits them.

I used to moonlight as a programming instructor. It let me meet developing talent, promote my day job, and do some headhunting.

Day job loved it.

I think the reason they usually object is because it alters team dynamics. Imagine if you get promoted to Senior at one job, but are still Junior at another.

Also concerns about intellectual property.
I remember that used to be the case, but for the past few months it's been wrapping for me (as it is here, for me.) I wonder if you have a cached version of an old stylesheet or something?
Good call. Done. https://twitter.com/docsparse/status/1581461734665367554?s=4...
Thank you for the response ( especially since it does not read like a corporate damage control response ).

I will admit that I am conflicted, because I can see some really cool potential applications of Copilot, but I can't say I am not concerned if what Tim maintains is accurate for several different reasons.

Lets say Copilot becomes the way of the future. Does it mean we will be able to trust the code more or less? We already have people, who copy paste stack overflow without trying to understand what the code does. This is a different level, where machine learning seems to suggest a snippet. If it works 70% of time, we will have a new generation of programmers management always wanted.
Because the line spacing and margins and font pitch are specifically chosen so that 1 page = 1 minute. This is critical. It's also why dialog is written in a much narrower column than description.

But also, the typewriter font is "without personality". It gives a neutral almost engineering feel so you can focus on the content without being swayed by the style of a typeface.

I think it also conveys a sense of technical precision. Every comma, every dash matters. Screenwriting is incredibly precise. In comedy, the exact punctuation is as critical as the words.

(BTW, multicam comedies like Friends are double-spaced and follow a different formatting and speed-per-page. The double-spacing is to allow for handwritten changes and notes.)
I much prefer to have my remains buried as god has intended.
How in-use is XMPP these days? Are there communities built around it like IRC/matrix? Are there common services that play nice with open source XMPP clients?
no worries - I see I typed "pase space" so <shrug> :-)
your employer will typically have you sign an employment agreement within which you agree they are your lord. if they didn't, go get em tiger
Google still has indexed her site. Is that odd? If I search for Jihad rehab, it's the top hit on bing and duckduckgo... but its nowhere to be found on google.

https://www.google.com/search?q=Jihad+rehab

https://www.bing.com/search?q=jihad+rehab

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=jihad+rehab

https://jihadrehab.com/robots.txt
Well, any nation at any point might choose to halt debt payments.
>What If LaTeX Had Instant Preview?

TiddlyWiki[1] with KaTeX plugin[2] does that. Or any project that uses KaTeX for that matter.

Next?

[1]https://tiddlywiki.com/

[2]https://katex.org/
There are an infinite number of things that could be included in an employment contract that would be unenforceable. Should conditions on other sources of income be enforceable?
CDC’s raw v-safe data obtained by ICAN
This is already a problem with anyone who ever copypastes from Stack Overflow. You're all violating CC-BY-SA[0] and nobody really cares about this.

[0] https://stackoverflow.com/help/licensing
Because it’s about partnership on an adventure, and that requires trust. Compare with the other partnership scenario that people are more familiar with: finding a romantic partner, and accomplishing something together like raising a family. Founding a company and taking it to success is in many ways more challenging, risks as much emotional damage if things don’t go right, has a much much higher failure rate, a much less refined cultural playbook, and almost no help from biology. I conjecture that the business playbook typically being transactional makes healthy founding relationships further hard. Doing things together is a fundamentally human thing, but conventional “startup advice” can often get in the way. There’s also probably something to the fact that people are raised to obey institutional rules & roles as individuals rather forming fruitful collaborations and partnerships.
Can you please name top 3 things for which you think Indians are satisfied with the current Government in India? What are few things that have changed from the last 70 years?
The first thing I though when I saw this was "is it legal". The way rights holders protect their assets these days I can imagine it won't be too long before it's taken off line. A shame really its fun to read scripts.
I'm not aware of any salary arrangement where they are paying X to get Y amount of work done. Your describing per-project contracting work, and this is plenty common in the software industry. Instead they are paying X dollars to get Y hours of your time (usually in the US 40).
Probably more accurate to say, "LLM service provider." Ultimately, GitHub distributes a derivative of OpenAI's Codex – though, the version in production has been tuned considerably.
> The OpenAI codex model (from which Copilot is derived) works a lot like a translation tool. When you use Google to translate from English to Spanish, it’s not like the service has ever seen that particular sentence before. Instead, the translation service understands language patterns (i.e. syntax, semantics, common phrases). In the same way, Copilot translates from English to Python, Rust, JavaScript, etc. The model learns language patterns based on vast amounts of public data

As I understand, this isn't proven is it?

We don't know that the model isn't simply stitching and approximating back to the closest combination of all the data it saw, versus actually understanding the concepts and logic.

Or is my understanding already behind times?
I can't disable Labels on the satellite layer either.
> But if the US has provided the hardware and software, they obviously will have the encryption keys.

What Starlink provides is Internet access. For what you say to be the case, Ukraine would have to be using unencrypted protocols, which is nonsensical.

> Anyway, my whole point is that thanks to Starlink in Ukraine, the US intelligence and military have a bird's eye view of how the Ukranians are fighting the Russians.

And my whole point is that the US gets basically no more data than they already have by doing what you are claiming. That's why Musk said he would cut Ukraine off and asked the US to pay for it.
Thanks. You say about the OSS release, so, what parts (if any) aren't OSS yet? Is there a timeline for releasing more parts of this project as OSS?
> I want there to be trust so we can both grow the company together.

You're expecting partner-level commitment from employees, are you offering them partner-level compensation, ownership and decision making?
I'm still missing why this product exists.

The RPlate – Reviver’s consumer digital license plate product – offers two device options: a battery-powered, self-installed model with a replaceable 5-year battery available at $19.95/month; and a hard-wired, professionally installed model with integrated telematics features and a backlit display, at $24.95/month. Both devices offer users a new platform to connect their vehicle with a set of services including registration renewal, vehicle location services, and security features such as easily reporting it stolen.

https://reviver.com/press-release/reviver-announces-official...
> just because something is "illegal" doesn't mean it's good to have this banned

No, but it means that the question has nothing to do with money. Using BTC to launder or evade tracking for a transaction that is illegal is simply committing another crime. If you want to be free of prosecution, talk to your government, don't just cheat and figure it's OK because it's crypto. That's how you end up in jail.
Is it conceivable for a civilization to invent cheap space travel, but not nuclear weapons?
Can You Salvage Your Rug?
Is it ethical to include an unenforceable clause in a contract?
> Physics is not only sufficient to create minds, it's why they work this way, otherwise I would imagine God could have done better.

Is this proposition subject to all the unreliability you note?

Is this proposition 100% unanimous scientific consensus?
You may hire a good plumbers to do what you're describing, but he is going to bill you for each repair separately, and will be incentivized to find as many issues as possible. That's going to be very expensive. Greedy owners would try to reduce the cost by writing a fixed monthly rate into the contract, and would cry later when the contract attracts a cheap slacker who pretends to be competent.