skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's not just evident to a lot of people; he has claimed it himself, and it's basically confirmed. Here's the relevant part of his Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanye_West#Mental_health

There's a lot of stuff there, among other things:

> West said that he often has suicidal ideation. In a 2019 interview with David Letterman, West stated that he has bipolar disorder.
But at this point, why not build a new one instead? It's old tech at any rate.

Also, why not try an iterative approach? What would be the cost to build an extra copy?

In fact, doesn't the Hubble share parts with spy satellites?
The problem of the implication of pop memetics is that it discounts agency.

Consider a community of mathematicians, all trying to discover some high-hanging proof (e.g. Goldbach). It's true that the mathematicians come up with strategies that then spread to the rest of the community if they're useful. But the mathematicians aren't mere vessels for these ideas. They decide which strategies to pursue, and whether the strategies they receive from others seem (to their mind) useful in pursuing the ultimate goal.

From a strictly formal perspective, memetics is true in that the mathematical community may behave like a peer-to-peer system using a gossip protocol. But I don't think anyone would say that the individuals aren't "in charge" but are "just hosts for proof strategies".

Granted, media personalities may not be that contemplative: a scientific community is kind of one extreme. But the example shows that it's not possible to determine whether the tail is wagging the dog or vice versa, just by appealing to the concept of memetics.
What about a restaurant?
Other people have pointed out that there's no federal mandate to accept cash. However, several states do require this: New Jersey, Rhode Island, Connecticut, and Massachusetts. This also appears to be true in New York (city), San Francisco, and Philadelphia.
I'm not the person you're responding to, but I myself prefer giving the users the moderation tools that affect only their view of the content. Users trying to save other users from posts they personally disagree with, in my opinion, can lead to echo chambers just by itself. Let me configure my account so that I can block or mute specific users or highlight keywords I can add to a list or allow users to tag posts. That way others can express their opinions in more ways than just commenting and I can use that data to determine if I want to read the existing comments or not.

I do think HN is one of the better moderation systems since this is one of the saner places on the internet and you can still configure things so you can at least see all the content, though you can't interact with it all. I would just prefer it if I was in charge of saving myself from bad opinions or whatever motivates people to down vote posts into oblivion.
I’m don’t own any crypto but this is overly dismissive. Encoding game theoretic concepts into a “token” such that various parties can be incentivized in the correct way such that the value of the overall ecosystem is maximized is a valuable concept.

There are many great cons, the current monetary system could easily be considered one of them. Fractional reserve banking is a fraudulent concept at its core. Yet, we keep it because it kind of works to create the right incentives (we accept some level of corruption for this reason). It isn’t (at all) clear to me that we have landed on an optimal system.
Nope. You don't need permission to scrape publicly accessible data, and that's only on the legal side of things. Data behind any kind of login is not fair game. Apple also has rules against use of any scraped data you aren't explicitly authorized to access.
4 bucks a week is unrealistically low. From the article, the average lottery player with an income below $30k spends 13% of their income on the lottery; it's not uncommon for individual scratchers to cost $10 or $20. If the only lottery game offered were a single big draw, I might be tempted by this line of reasoning, but in practice state lottery systems set up all kinds of micro-rewards and side games which make no sense from the "selling a dream" angle.
I think one of the strengths of Kustomize is precisely that it's basic - although it may not be as basic as you think if you haven't used it in anger.

I don't want complexity in my manifests. I want them to be to the point.

Renaming in multiple places is very easy with find-replace.
I have never had an uneventful flight on American. I avoid them even if it costs me more time and money.
It's not that "no response" defaults to 0, it's that in Factorio's circuit network, "no signal" and "signal with a value of 0" are exactly synonymous.
I think you don’t quite understand why people participate in lotteries and gamble. Lottery scratch off tickets are especially popular because of the possibility of many plays in a short period with intermittent rewards.

Also, in your scheme participating in the nation lottery is compulsory? That doesn’t sit well with me
This reminds me of the book Psychology of Money where this is specifically talked about:

"""

No One's Crazy

...

But every financial decision a person makes, makes sense to them in that moment and checks the boxes they need to check. They tell themselves a story about what they’re doing and why they’re doing it, and that story has been shaped by their own unique experiences.

Take a simple example: lottery tickets. Americans spend more on them than movies, video games, music, sporting events, and books combined.

And who buys them? Mostly poor people. The lowest-income households in the U.S. on average spend $412 a year on lotto tickets, four times the amount of those in the highest income groups. Forty percent of Americans cannot come up with $400 in an emergency. Which is to say: Those buying $400 in lottery tickets are by and large the same people who say they couldn’t come up with $400 in an emergency. They are blowing their safety nets on something with a one-in-millions chance of hitting it big.

That seems crazy to me. It probably seems crazy to you, too. But I’m not in the lowest income group. You’re likely not, either. So it’s hard for many of us to intuitively grasp the subconscious reasoning of low-income lottery ticket buyers.

But strain a little, and you can imagine it going something like this:

> We live paycheck-to-paycheck and saving seems out of reach. Our prospects for much higher wages seem out of reach. We can’t afford nice vacations, new cars, health insurance, or homes in safe neighborhoods. We can’t put our kids through college without crippling debt. Much of the stuff you people who read finance books either have now, or have a good chance of getting, we don’t. Buying a lottery ticket is the only time in our lives we can hold a tangible dream of getting the good stuff that you already have and take for granted. We are paying for a dream, and you may not understand that because you are already living a dream. That’s why we buy more tickets than you do.

You don’t have to agree with this reasoning. Buying lotto tickets when you’re broke is still a bad idea. But I can kind of understand why lotto ticket sales persist.

And that idea—“What you’re doing seems crazy but I kind of understand why you’re doing it.”—uncovers the root of many of our financial decisions.

Few people make financial decisions purely with a spreadsheet. They make them at the dinner table, or in a company meeting. Places where personal history, your own unique view of the world, ego, pride, marketing, and odd incentives are scrambled together into a narrative that works for you.

"""
> Why are employers increasingly being so hostile with their workforces?

They aren't. This is one unexpected headline. Most companies are being very nice to their employees because they know the job market is tight.
> They used 6months of code camp training while being paid, and as soon as they could they left.

I would ask what you're doing as an employer that creates an environment where the people you're paying literally can't wait to get away from you.
most people are happy to pay $1 for a remote chance of winning $300,000

The wealthy class is of course happy to pay a small amount in lotto lobbying to ward off larger proportional tax increases to fund infrastructure. Hence we are stuck with lotto 4 times a week.
Because you can fit a lot of terminals on a modern display.

Aha! you say, just use tmux.

tmux is great, but I like the feel of a tileing window manager more than tmux.
> The employer would like employees to have the minimum information

This kind of old, hierarchical thinking from the 1950s needs to go away.
I'm not sure if I understand your comment. What do you mean with "productivity information"? And why access should be so important?
I would argue that "the whims of the public" is the most significant political issue there is. You're basically saying this selects for people who have good theory of mind at scale; I fail to see how having more of those is a bad thing.
Please renounce your moderatorship since you are obviously unable to correctly deduce what is a real argument and what is designed to cause flame wars.

I have no idea why people here fawn over your moderating. Please spare this website of anymore of it.
What is your evidence, beyond an apriori argument, that this would lead to something helpful?

Why should I be compelled by the state to give my money to something that isn't clearly helpful to society?
They could grow the website just fine - it was growing the advertising (read: profits) that is the problem.

And you'll know the death-knell for reddit is here when they crack down on the porn.
So, they should build something state-of-the-art there instead of what will effectively be a museum.

(This would probably be a lot easier to get funded if Puerto Rico were a state...)
The key caveat of their cash flow positivity though is stock-based compensation.
It's a very complicated debate about how much one should actually care, but as an investor in equity the company being cash positive (on the basis of operating activities) due to dilution(because that is what stock-based comps entails) isn't cool.

Pulling the numbers from Bloomberg for Q2 2022: Cash from ops 439, stock-based comp 470.
On the developer's Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/tschaff) there's a few more details. He's a former AA flight attendant, seems like there was a somewhat similar project underway internally in the airline union which he was on but got kicked off of and built this separately.
>Once it gets too big for that, you're doomed to destruction eventually.

>My preferred solution would be to break up the communities once they're too big, instead of trying to make a massive world-wide community like Twitter does.

I agree with this. In real life situations you can see it too, the larger the crowd the stupider their total behaviour becomes. Large crowds are good for certain things though, but mostly primal stuff like singing and chanting.
To be clear, I mean if your employer incurs $20k in costs for relocation for you. Not if you get a '$20k' relocation allocation and you only spend, say, $5k.

The tax rules changed in 2018, any relocation-related expenses are considered taxable as income with no exceptions (unless you're in the military).
Why isn't it "rational" to purchase entertainment products you enjoy? Do you think economists actually rely on the axiom that humans are born with a perfect ability to play logic and probability games?
Then perhaps AA corporate should have responded more promptly to the writer’s request for information had they been interested in being more fairly represented.
Yet another reason to build a website instead of an "App".
It seems to me that all this could be delivered via website or PWA... Then no one could block it.
Careful client side caching would help for times of no connectivity.
Yes, “rota” would be the commonest word for this idea. Although I did immediately understand “roster” in the article, so maybe that’s also in use. “Rota” is definitely what I would say though
You can always still publish when they don't react within a reasonable time, and add a comment to that effect, as you can often see in newspaper articles.
> However, you won’t be getting the advanced features like automation or other integration and collaboration features provided by GitHub.

Codeberg is working on CI and you can request early access. I've found it to work well and fast.

https://codeberg.org/Codeberg-CI
Believe it or not, some people honestly have moral scruples against gambling.

Sine those scruples don't really hurt anyone else, forcing them to violate those scruples is just mean.
Compulsory enrolment in a lottery? This isn't remotely legal. Also I view lotteries as taxes on those that don't understand probability and money investing.
A way to survive business: Grow your tribe, make fans and sell subscriptions
Some people spend $10-20 on them. And that adds up quickly if you do it multiple times a week.
Statistics show that the subscription business model has grown by 435% in the last nine years.
By 2022, the global subscription e-commerce market is projected to increase from $72.91 billion to $120.04 billion. Moreover, it is estimated to reach $904.2 billion by 2026. Compared to this year, that means a $784 billion increase.
Before the internet, people paid for subscriptions to services like newspapers, oil, and milk delivery. But it has historically been difficult for companies to adopt and implement new subscription business models. Subscription models have faced many challenges for decades, including simply collecting payments. Due to a lack of infrastructure, it was difficult for businesses to collect recurring payments from thousands or even millions of clients.

In the modern world, digital payment platforms such as PayPal and Stripe have enabled recurring payments to be set up and processed without investing massive amounts of the workforce.
So now implementing the subscription business model is so easy, but why should business owners do that?
There are so many reasons why the subscription model works. Higher sales conversion rate, stable, steady, and predictable revenue stream, more CLTV, less spending on retention marketing, better inventory management, etc. But there is one main reason:
Subscription is a powerful business model because it creates an environment where the default customer behavior is retention, as opposed to one where the default behavior is churn.
Imagine. You pay a lot to attract a customer, from the costs related to design and tech and support to the cost of marketing and CAC. Finally, you draw a customer and sell the desired product to him. But he uses another website for the next purchase for variety. Ouch. All expenses are wasted.
Black Friday and Cyber Monday are coming in about a month. A market of about 10 billion dollars. You experience more traffic daily On average, something like a 90% increase in traffic compared to regular days. At the same time, you are not facing normal users. Users are 130% more willing to buy than usual.
So it is better not to lose this number of users and this number of buyers, and they do not buy from you just once. Setting up a subscription for products with this potential can be the leading solution to this issue and turn your Black Friday customers into permanent fans.
As a solution for those who have a Shopify store, we at Hengam have created a subscription app with 3 main features. 1. The simplicity of working with the app 2. The presence of experienced customer success managers 3. 24-hour and compelling support
Let us know what you think of our app and how we can make it a better resource by looking at it.
What are its prime directives?
How Fly.io and Tailscale Saved Notado
> When I mean science I mean the scientific method, which is pretty universal

The scientific method does not have volition, it must be implemented by humans.

> ...and you won't find a better tool to get to the bottom of things.

It's an extremely popular meme, but how did you go about determining that it is comprehensively true?

> You don't need a comprehensive understanding to find objective truth either.

You do of variables that have causal influence on the problem space you're making claims of fact about.

> Newton's theory of gravitation is a really crude approximation to general relativity, and yet it's all true.

It is true that it exists, but the results that it produces are not necessarily true.

> Unfortunately for us the world doesn't exactly work like our intuitions suggests, so relying on them is not enough to understand it.

But is that not what you are doing here today? Your ability to provide proof of your claims may shed some light, let's wait and see.

> I don't think religious people are mocked for speculating...

They are. Perhaps you've never witnessed it, or perhaps your biases do not allow you to see it.

> ...they are mocked for being dogmatic, but at the same time completely changing the interpretation of their dogma to serve their purposes, for power no less.

Indeed - a lot like Scientific Materialists! My interest is in why there is such a substantial double standard when it comes to people discussing the flaws of the different people. Does it not seem weird that people will criticize their outgroup members for flaws that they themselves suffer from, while representing that they have superior intellectual capabilities?
> American Airlines has been contacted for comment.

They have been asked for one.
I don't think it's super productive discourse to call an entire country, especially one as large, diverse, and developed as Canada, "mediocre" in its entirety.
I'd guess is that comes from how genuine it all is? The "continuity" doesnt come from "I care about continuity" but just from "This is how these people would act."
Any fixed timespan chosen to analyze risk is arbitrary, and you can convert between timespans using probability math. I'd say it's typical to choose the average "mission" length, because that's the most relevant to the purpose. For a self driving car, an hour would make sense. For the first stage of a rocket, 5 minutes. You don't ride in a car appreciating every 5 seconds that you haven't crashed yet, do you? Maybe if it's a taxi ride in Los Angeles!

For a system that isn't "mission" oriented, you would probably think more in terms of mean time between failure.
How is the app getting the information for flight attendants, some of which looks like it might be security- and privacy-sensitive?

If it turns out that the app was getting confidential information using flight attendants' access credentials, potential problems:
(1) potentially leaking confidential information to other parties, such as app developer, partners, and other users; and
(2) potential additional weakness in handling access credentials.

If it turns out that special credentials weren't required for security- and privacy-sensitive data, then maybe that's a problem.

If it turns out that flight attendants were entering information considered security- and privacy-sensitive, then maybe that's a problem. (Though it looks like the article might've been prompted by the app developer, to pressure scraping access, so presumably there's something from scraping that the app wasn't getting or getting as well from user-entered info.)
Forgive my ignorance: I thought you could basically say/post anything on Twitter as long as:

* it was not actively illegal (CP, terrorism etc)

* hacked info

* deadnaming trans people

Is that not the case anymore?
https://www.thecut.com/2022/02/kanye-west-bipolar-disorder.h... : "He has famously referred to bipolar disorder as his “superpower,”"

This is key to understanding bipolar: it has an "upswing" phase in which someone has more energy and less inhibition. Increased self-belief as well. It can, if you're lucky, be just the right thing to catapult someone into incredible creative works.

The risk is that risk-taking may not pay off, and the inhibitions may have been there for good reason. Not to mention that there's also a downswing phase which looks like depression and comes with elevated suicide risk.
The last time this happened (Albertsons/Safeway), many of my local Albertsons locations were spun out to another company to appease regulators. That company failed almost immediately and Albertsons bought those locations back.

In my area the chain grocers are now Albertsons and Kroger. That’s it.

The regional chain is Stater Bros.

I don’t know if Southern California is an anomaly or not though.
Banning other lotteries should make it much harder for those people to get hooked in the first place, shouldn't it?
And how would that solve anything?

It’s the backend that is getting blocked.
Ah, I think I see what you mean now.

The ability to liquidate collateral is the the stand-in for both creditworthiness and the mechanism for recouping their principal. They would have no recourse to recover their funds if a crash were so drastic that they could not meaningfully liquidate collateral.
When the jackpot would get really high for the Powerball I'd set a meeting for me and a few coworkers. We'd go across the street to a bodega to get a ticket or two and sit in the park for a bit to talk/argue about what we'd do with the money. We'd all return to the office happier despite knowing we obviously wouldn't win.
After you log in to iCloud, of course. And then you have to download the Xcode tools, which is fine because it only takes ~8 hours. You'll probably want to reboot after the latest version of Monterey downloads, but make sure you do this after the Xcode tools are done downloading. While you're at it, you should also disable SIP so you can use the filesystems on your external drive, and you'll also want to double-check that your docks/Ethernet components are all MacOS-compatible. You'll also need a copy of GNU's coreutils, so grab those after installing Homebrew/Nix or else you'll get dozens of bash errors. Can't forget Docker, either! That's okay, just go to the Docker website and download their Commercial Client, and only run it when you need a container. We can't just run Docker in the background of a modern OS, can we?

Depending on your workflow, MacOS is fully capable of wasting your time. Especially if you're a developer, MacOS will frequently go out of it's way to deliver you a worse UNIX environment than Linux. If MacOS makes you happy, use it - but nobody is deploying their web infrastructure to MacOS. You're beholden to Linux usage whether you like it or not.
The statement "capitalism is the problem" can be saying that capitalism is the problem with respect to a more regulated for of capitalism, Nordic socialism, or even a platonic ideal/imaginary version of communism.

Saying that Ukraine is the aggressor in the current war is a much more specific factual claim (that is absolutely a lie).
Most big lotto wins are in the seven to low eight digit range. You can absolutely blow away that amount of money in just a few years, and there are dozens of examples.
The obvious, clear, indisputable answers are:

- yes

- yes

- yes (>99%, at least if we allow that the outcomes may be more serious than the predictions)

- yes

- no (they can't be: the impact will be civilization-ending)

It's really very simple, you have to willfully ignore or misrepresent the data to come to any other conclusion.
So there is a Sword Of Damocles that could fall any time within the next year or so if the recession deepens?
I don't know, for-profit prisons are definitely in the running.
But EV isn't everything, skew and volatility also determine price or value. No +EV is worth $1,000 ticket for a single 0.0000000000001% chance of a bajillion dollars.
Maybe allow for a preview of the editing process and before publishing you prompt for a sign-up with the explaining you gave above?