skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Unless you’re just don’t need to concern yourself with the elemental aspects of survival, this is a dangerous mindset for you to be in.

When you’re billing regularly and you do a little extra above and beyond the billing that’s on you. However, it degrades the relationship from business to “some helpful pal” to not respect the dynamic of value.

Here’s a cross post I wrote from a prior response on “how do you bill?” Maybe seeing things as more methodical and commoditized will help you…

Learn the art of invoice.

I create an invoice immediately.

Start invoicing after the first conversation where you agree you will be doing the work.

Invoice immediately.

Micro invoice if you have to.

Invoice in minimum four hour blocks just for talking.

Invoice in ten+ hour blocks like a retainer for mom and pop shops so you can inch forward.

Invoice requesting portions up front (just to begin!) on invoices worth over 10k.

Bill reguglarly.

Invoice up front for the TOTAL amount, and then send the same (modified) invoice periodically (once a week, once every two weeks, every 30 days, or on incremental delivery. What ever works best!) for regular payments on completion of milestones.

And did I mention KEEP INVOICING! Don’t have feelings. The contract part is you will DO THE WORK and they PAY YOU.

You may think I’m being silly. Too many fine technical folks are ignorant and afraid of MONEY.

Bill for everything productive (talking, email, meetings). In fact, a good rule of thumb is to add 25% to your estimated project costs for TALKING and other administrative tasks (as low as 15 minute increments if necessary.)

Good luck! And remember, INVOICE!
> I remember being always like that. But it seems the ambition of making it big has infected my passion. For anything I want to build, I am obsessed with the possibility of monetizing it. The story of SaaS millionaires only reinforces the thought process. I remember this never being a question when I first started programming. Maybe that's just curse of seniority. I do wonder if it's possible to get back to doing things just for "the love of craftsmanship."

This is me as well.

I am currently learning Common Lisp and it has brought a whole new joy to learning a language. As I am learning it and trying to write the tightest code possible I think about the craftsmanship aspect.

Once I get to a point where I can write "real" applications using CL I hope to start "scratching my own itch" with it. But first I gotta find an itch!
In my opinion almost every statement of yours is wrong. Maybe it could become true if you treat everyone like a potential terrorist and some adopt this insanity.

It should not be a secret that if you suspect people of being potential terrorists, that they might not like you or anyone you are associated with. And maybe they will then just support those you dislike.

I think you are a victim of war propaganda that you perceive this as a significant threat. You are the extremist you try to call out. Without any evidence aside from maybe some rude internet chat from computer gamers. This is a complete insane assessment.
Andy Warhol and Debbie Harry at the 1985 Commodore Amiga Launch
Please, deleting a tweet is hardly being 'physically restrained'

> Than it's up to the community to decide how t interact with those people.

Twitter is a private company, and it chooses to run it's service how it wants. The government avoids actually physically restraining racist bigots, and lets the community decide how to deal and interact with those people. Some may chose to harbor them (Parlor, 4chan, etc), and others (like twitter) may opt to not host them.

It's not a huge social injustice if you're not allowed to tweet. Feel free to go to one of the millions of other websites, or your start your own (it's easier to do this than ever!) and see who's interested in what you have to say.

> Maybe everyone exposed to something should be re-exposed to the theme once there's a new development.

You're just reinventing content moderation!
In case anyone interprets this literally: if copilot regurgitates literal code it was trained on that doesn't actually give you an unencumbered version.
Can We All Just Admit React Hooks Were a Bad Idea?
The NHTSA is regulating all the wrong things. How many people have been killed by wrong headlight shape? How would you even test that regulation? Meanwhile, people are free to go 100mph in cities, with the trivially demonstrable deaths that causes for no upside.
Can’t wait to watch the Kanye West dead stick nose dive
Just like a twitchy video game! I feel your pain.
Same way Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J did it!
on the other hand, if this mostly applies to childhood behaviors, I doubt we'll see much of an effect. My kid was still chewing grass and tasting dirt clods in the middle of covid.
The problem with good applications of NFTs is that we still do not know what an NFT is.

In particular there are a lot of variables around reselling restrictions, profit sharing, meaningful ownership, copyright, etc.
She's super funny! Thanks.
But that statement is true for some development and business models. No automated testing is like mastrubation - no one wants to admit, but many do it.

https://insights.stackoverflow.com/survey/2019 (search for Unit Tests, #-linking doesn’t work correctly on this site, perhaps because they don’t test it)

Also tap on a Job Satisfaction button to see how it correlates.
Durability, quality and reparability. Most fabrics build today are so fragile and needs to be replaced soon, despite the advance in material and weaving.

Most highly qualified workers loves what they do and would stand for keeping they’re output quality up. On the contrary interchangeable cheap workers have no real incentive to that. The factory’s manager is left alone in charge to balance quality versus cheapness, and the last comes with obsolescence (planned or not), which is good for business.
I think wiping the disk using factory reset isn’t going to wipe or overwrite the data though, especially on SSDs. If you try to overwrite files or sectors, that may not actually overwrite those specific sectors either. All unencrypted data may be available to read.

My guess is you’re out of luck if you don’t trust full disk encryption when it’s done right from the beginning of using the machine. Physical destruction isn’t cost effective when the machine is sent for repair.
Hey, including copyrighted code, especially from other repositories without a correct license, is an honest mistake. You should be able to file a DMCA request with a list of all the repos containing your code, and then they should just retrain copilot with those repos excluded. Clearly that's what is needed for them to stop distributing your code. /s

Sarcasm aside I think there are several possible legal viewpoints here (IANAL):

1. copilot is distributing copies of code and it's not a safe harbor: Microsoft is directly liable to copyright infringement by copilot producing code without appropriate license/attribution.

2. copilot is distributing copies of code and it's a safe harbor: Microsoft is not directly liable, but it should comply with DMCA requests. Practically that would mean retraining with mentioned code snippets/repositories excluded in a timely manner, otherwise I don't see a way how they could disentangle the affected IP from the already trained models.

3. copilot produces novel work by itself not subject to copyright of the training data: I think this is really a stretch. IANAL, but I think producing novel creative work is a right exclusive to living human beings, so machines can't produce them almost by definition. (There is the monkey selfie copyright case, but at least the "living" there was ticked off).

4. the user of copilot is producing novel work by prompting copilot: it's like triggering a camera. The copyright of the resulting picture is fully owned by the operator, even though much of the heavy lifting is done by the camera itself. Even then, this very much depends on the subject.

IMO option 3 doesn't have a legal standing. Microsoft and users of copilot would very much like if it was option 4 that applied always, but this particular case clearly falls under option 1 or option 2, in which case Microsoft should hold some legal liability, even if they can't always track the correct license ahead of time.
It is only safe for the SQL server. An injection attack could still be targeting a cache (to poison it with e.g. a malicious script), the browser (to steal data via XSS/CSRF) or the user (show an error message telling them to contact malicious number).
IMO that doesn’t absolve Microsoft at all. If someone uploads ripped MP3s to the internet somewhere, it doesn’t mean you could aggregate them, burn CDs and sell them.
Intersting. How did you work around the issue that HTMX takes snapshots of the altered DOM (by Alpinejs) for history navigation [0]? This is the biggest issue holding me back from using the two together.

[0] https://github.com/bigskysoftware/htmx/issues/1015
Have you ever done drugs?
Yeah sure, or more like, wait in huge queue in front of train station to get to security check, then wait in queue to waiting room, then wait in queue on exit from waiting room to platform, then get checked at train door and finally get checked ticket while seated. Meanwhile at Schengen airport - I get checked my ticket by automated machine, then just go to security check at my boarding gate and then get checked boarding pass and get into plane. All of this without hundreds of people trying to get to same plane since usual capacity is around <200-300 compared to much more in Chinese trains.

As I said 130USD is crazy expensive when I can fly in Europe similar routers for 20-50 USD and it will take me 2 hours instead 7.5 hours. There is no difference between getting to Chinese HSR station or European airport, but it's PITA getting to actual Chinese train vs European airplane.

And let's rather not compare slow European trains where can I board the train with zero checks anywhere, heck sometimes even without checked ticket.
> My biggest take-away: LLM maintainers (like GitHub) must transparently discuss the way models are built and implemented

The best way to be transparent about a software implementation is to open source the thing. If that's your take away, this is the only logical thing to do. Blogs posts would be appreciated but are not enough. We can only trust what you say, we cannot verify anything.
Thinking Fast and Slow by Kahneman
I mean they were literally persecuted by the United States itself, which the right has never been. McArthyism, blacklisting, banning, COINTELPRO and the most enormous propaganda campaigns in history since WWII. The US went to war with leftists and eradicated them, which is why European (and generally global) politics looks so different as many of those places didn't have such direct oppression.
Most newer vehicles have automatically dimmed rear view mirrors to prevent this issue from vehicles behind you.
does being part of a project because of lack of resources count as being critical?
Noted.

One thing to keep in mind here is that anything that allows anonymous publishing/uploading/etc will be used for malware delivery. This is what killed Firefox Send: https://blog.mozilla.org/en/products/firefox/firefox-news/up...

Even with forced sign-in, we see multiple phishing attempts per month. People sign up and create pages saying something like "You have a new IMPORTANT PDF FILE, click here to open". The links always lead to fake OneDrive pages. This hurts our users because then the whole domain is marked as suspicious.

My gut feeling is that without forced sign-in this could be done at scale. I don't know how Telegraph solves it.

This said, I think "maybe require the login to publish to the public in the end" could be a good workflow. No idea how many people feel the same way you do, though. Off the top of my head I can't remember any other mainstream SaaS things that do it.
> still didn't kill anybody due to radiation leaks.

So what? Solar isn't killing anyone due to radiation leaks either. The subject is death rate, not death due to radiation leaks.

This is yet another example of you trying to get away with cherry picking data. And failing at it.

Besides the fact that the radiation deaths from Fukushima will come.

At least six workers have exceeded lifetime legal limits for radiation and more than 175 (0.7%) have received significant radiation doses

That will never happen with a solar power plant. Never.

And you avoided the question. Does Japan have crap technology? Is that your explanation for the Fukushima disaster? That was your excuse for Russia. What's your excuse for the Fukushima disaster?

There have been nuclear power disasters requiring evacuation at the minimum in Russia, the US, and Japan. Can you name a solar power disaster?

Several comments ago you said "I think we're done here". And in another comment "Again, I think we're done here". You called that wrong, didn't you? Twice.
I enjoyed the Josephine Tay book mentioned.

Sometimes rated as the best detective fiction novel ever.

Available as out of copyright in Canada at least.
Agree. The big one you missed is identity. Most hate is anonymous. Being able to filter by tags like “known racist” or whatever, and seeing someone’s history of sharing misinformation is useful but most people would self-censor if their identity was known or other users would filter out those that won’t identify.

What I wonder is what Musk will do if he finds out the scales are artificially weighted towards conservative content. Like if conservative content is artificially boosted by bots and algorithms. Facebook was much more liberal before thumbs were put on the scale. I don’t remember when but I think it was Mother Jones that saw huge traffic movement changes after algo changes like a decade ago?

https://www.theverge.com/2020/10/17/21520634/facebook-report...

Like what if the natural state of humanity is much more liberal than the American media and social media allow for? Will Musk allow that or will he see anything that doesn’t align with his views as error or manipulation?

What if a truly free and transparent self-moderating platform naturally promotes leftism more than a moderated but manipulated feed does?
I live in London which has all-but banned cars in the city centre (they're not banned, but there is an expensive congestion charge which means that in practice most traffic in the centre is buses, taxis, or very wealthy people).

However, there is an exception for anyone with a "blue badge" holder (for those with disabilities which prevent easy mobility - wheelchair users and others). These people not only get free car access to the city centre (which now has a lot less traffic because nobody else is driving there), but also get to park in places that most people are not allowed to, etc.
Question stands for ECS too, does it actually have full feature parity by now? Last time I used it it was still more limited.
Branding matters more than reality.
I'm pretty sure this is a misconception. He never called Seinfeld a show about nothing. That was the show that his character and George pitched to the TV execs in Seinfeld.
Man, you have a lot going on!

Regarding e-waste. Not sure where you live, but we have Freecycle and a Facebook "Buy nothing" group that my wife uses. They let us find a home for tons of stuff we otherwise would have had to throw out.
I don't accept that content deletion is a way to go. When an offensive content is deleted we lose the ability to jude it for urselves. The content must remain but be strictly attached to a persona so the persona can be "judged" rightfully. In real life, when we deal with these people we want to know what they did. It gives fidelity, unlike "the person said something that violates rule 4 section 3". We should stop pretending that we are not humans and embrace the human ways of dealing with human problems. There's nothing human in undoing speech.

And no, attaching follow up to organic content is not moderation.
Related: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1lZ9n2bxWA
Came across this article and it blew my mind, I am curious there are more content like this where qualities like leadership is defined using some sort of historic event
I'll name a counterexample: Google (used to work there) is very careful with the provence of external code, to the point that for simpler things it's often easier to write something internally than use the standard external thing.
The Nuggets from MS Ignite and Google Cloud Next
Just because an instrument can do equal temperament doesn't mean that is necessarily the best choice. Although absolute pitch can't be heard by most, relative pitch can, and so when playing any interval, such as a fourth, it will sound off in equal temperament, yet sound perfect when you put it "out of tune". There's some pretty interesting music theory that comes out of the traditional 12 tones not being able to be equally subdivided to then be arranged into those perfect intervals
https://archive.ph/m850O
I’m very interested in isometric Rust apps. The widespread support for serialization makes it really nice for writing distributed systems that send arbitrarily complex data structures over the wire, which is where JS becomes a pain.
I think they have their own model. I've made chart and was checking forecast and comparing with real result for few weeks comparing many data sources for Prague and that was my result.

I don't consider Windy weather forecast app at all, I wanna see simple hourly forecast or simple day forecast without watching some animations and wasting my time plus it's horrible touch UI in general trying to see what will be temperature 24 hours from now through animation on phone.
Interesting how often "free speech" seems to equate with "free to be offensive jerk". If your best argument is presented in s way that makes it sound like "You're ruining my life! I hate you forever!" then maybe you should go for a timeout and come back when you can discuss things calmly and rationally. I listen to arguments, not tantrums and swearing

Edit: typo
I quite like Ars Technica. I wish I could edit the word "finally" out of their headlines whenever they use it.
I could install Windows2000 on that machine, it was delivered with Windows7 and Windows10 works too (lenovo T61p)...the Ethernet drivers are really not a problem and wireless works without problems even on Windows2000, same with the Nvidia drivers...works on all 3 Windows's.

Challenge Accepted and won.
1. power off (if needed)

2. unscrew all screws

3. replace everything non-functional

4. screw all screws, use blue fixator

5. power on

6. notice that one of bus ribbons was forgotten or misplaced

7. redo steps 1-5

8. get a final result, power on
Makes this tweet all the more relevant -
https://nitter.net/JudiciaryGOP/status/1578174670854975491
Ok so GPT-3 can model biases well. This still doesn't solve problems such as the optimal aggregation of citizens' preferences, which is the actual optimization problem of policy making. Just to give an idea of how complex a field this is, there is a subdomain of economic theory and information theory called social choice https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_choice_theory that works with these issues and itself does not have many theories about policy formation, mostly choice between already formed policies.
If a neural net finds the way to write policies that are Nash equilibrium collective decisions in all possible democracy systems then we will be close to solving the problem.
We don't have the resources deployed for this. They are too busy wasting thousands and thousands of rounds of ammunition each week, practicing for thier next shout-out.
RHEL9 is based on Fedora 34, and btw like i wrote the kernel is to -->NEW<-- for nvidia driver 340. But hey in typical Linux fashion, just use distro x i "never had that problem"...oh btw i use arch...
Seems like a pretty safe application of Betteridge's law of headlines.

Especially with no mention of cut in, rated speed, effective swept area, or cost
Prism Lighting
See also:

https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/Thesaurus:solitude
C3 is RiSC-V
A study showed that people are more aggressive online when using their real name

> Results show that in the context of online firestorms, non-anonymous individuals are more aggressive compared to anonymous individuals. This effect is reinforced if selective incentives are present and if aggressors are intrinsically motivated.

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal...
GPL doesn't prevent the copyright holder from also distributing the software under another license if they so choose.

Of course, that would have to be a decision by the copyright holders, which is possibly difficult to provide on GitHub given how easy it makes it to upload other people's work, and you would need the agreement of every contributor unless you do copyright assignment.

And you wouldn't be able to license a project using this service (i.e. with Copilot-generated code) under the GPL. But it's already unclear if you can legally do that today.
I took this as “if you need more than one, plan for storing ANYTHING greater 1 or greater”

Meaning that if I need to store specifically 2 addresses per user, don’t force it at the data layer… just make it an easy to swap validation and no literal limits elsewhere
Global Convergence of Hessenberg Shifted QR I: Dynamics
Very interest, never had thought about the possibility to skip CI on trivial changes, which makes total sense! Clever.
My Silicon Valley bubble is located in eastern Poland. :-) It's pretty much standard here. Feel free to move, life is cheaper and health care is free (albeit has other issues).

I mostly agree with you, simply yet to meet someone able to pull two jobs, without visible issues. Most of our team works hybrid - some remote, some on-site. Kinda hard to go dark in second full time job for 2-4 days each week. I assume from the fully remote ones, we've some which tries this, but it is maybe 1%-3%.
The guard can choose where they will work in solitary not. That’s totally different from the prisoners who are forced in solitary confinement. Basically, as long as you still can enjoy a choice, you have your freedom. Solitary is only bad if it’s forced onto you and it’s prolonged.
What's your favorite take-away?
The Army of Robots Coming
No,that's not true. It's an entirely separate product line called ESP32-C3. It doesn't seem to be that popular in fact.
See https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beleidigung_(Deutschland)#Miss...

> Das Behaupten wahrer Tatsachen ist demgegenüber grundsätzlich straflos.[76] Ausnahmsweise kann dies allerdings nach § 192 StGB eine Beleidigung darstellen. Voraussetzung hierfür ist, dass die Behauptung in einer Weise erfolgt, die ehrverletzend wirkt. Eine solche Formalbeleidigung kann beispielsweise dadurch begangen werden, dass eine Tatsache in einem herabwürdigenden Ton behauptet wird.[77] Dies trifft beispielsweise auf den Publikationsexzess zu. Hierbei wird eine Tatsache, etwa das Ausstehen von Schulden, öffentlich mit anprangernder und ehrverletzender Wirkung zur Schau gestellt.[78]

(Google Translate can probably help, if you don't read German.)
If someone created an AI for making movies, and it started spitting out star wars and marvel stuff, you can bet them saying "we trained it on other materials that violate copywriter" wouldn't be enough. They are banking on most devs not knowing, caring or having the ability to follow through on this.
Material Toys: A Material Design 3 components library for React
Socialism is apparently a dirty word in the US, but a perfectly normal political ideology in large parts of the rest of the world.
The first item in that list is "a person".
Ugh.

Try writing destroyKiev instead and see what happens.