skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Amazing good job. Will be testing everything out in the next few days.
I see it as capturing and refocusing of attention.

Our attention used to be on each other, now it predominantly rests on pieces of plastic, glass and metal.
If the regulations lead to a complete disappearance of the fishery then they are definitionally unsustainable.
Then it'd be good to mention what this storage mechanism is, and examples of existing commercial deployments said storage mechanism and their cost history. It's odd to see someone insist that the solution is so obvious that anyone who doesn't recognize it is trolling, yet they neglect to mention what that solution is.
You have it misconfigured; check the NSFW option in reddit web's preferences.
I'm unsure as to the thesis of this comment: what's your point?

Perhaps I just don't buy your premise. We understand ML models very-well, but we don't like the explanation. Models are on a spectrum from parametric where a data distribution is assumed, to non-parametric, where it isnt. In the non-param case, models largely remember compressed "averages" of historical data.

The sense in which we dont "understand" how, eg., a NN comes to a prediction is only in the sense that we cannot, a priori, locate the specific subset of historical data that it has taken a weighted average-of... but we know well that this is what its doing. ie., something incredibly dumb and boring.
Do you two know about ZomboDB (https://github.com/zombodb/zombodb)?

Quite deep Postgres/Elasticsearch integration
What do you mean by this? Are they actually building the intergalactical highway? If not, there will eb a planet. And there will be people. And they will enjoy life.
If only they'd listened to someone who warned them four years ago while possessed by a rare display of competence:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaBUNqVTkCs
WebRTC data channels would be ideal, so that clients can connect directly to servers (or at least regional proxies) in a UDP-like way. Vanilla minetest would need to include an WebRTC endpoint for this to become universally available. There are lots of details that would need to be worked out.
It's people being lied to by their sources, through a conflation of nameplate capacity and delivered power. You have to knock 90% off every claim you hear about a renewable, that puts the number in the ballpark of what users of electricity will actually get out of it.

It's of course the fossil fuel industry which profits from this relentless mendacity. Renewables are great, but they aren't coal's competition and coal knows it. Nuclear is.
What you call “experience” for me is just sensing of internal information processing, of internal representations. This may need some dedicated introspection to fully realize. You’re making a distinction which I believe is a mirage. It’s just a special attributation we make in our minds to those inner perceptions. If you look closely, it vanishes.

Think about it: How do you know that you have what you call an “experience”? It’s because you perceive the having of the experience. So, at some point, the perception of having an “experience” is something that enters as an input into your cognitive process, and you match it to some mental models you have about such inputs.

I adjusted my mental model to think of those “qualia” perceptions as being the sensing of parts of the internal workings of my brain. It’s a side-effect of all the processing that is going on, if you will, and of the likely fact that the sensing of some subset of the processing steps is being feed back as inputs into the cognitive processing.
I can’t be the only one that doesn’t understand what any of this means.

Can someone ELI5? Or, ELI am a software engineer with no web3 knowledge, at least?
Quite literally wild. There is nothing quite like watching David Attenborough walking us through the absolute ruthlessness of the animal kingdom in his plummy staccato voicing. There is no doubt that had cows evolved differently they would be as torturous to their prey as any other animal.

I think we can definitely do better, but I think it's equally clear that mother nature is not very opinionated on the topic.
Care to namedrop your favorites?
Storage is a common answer, but it has problems of its own. Presumably the OP considers these problems fatal; if you disagree, say so and explain why.
I’m getting a lot of mileage out of this simple bookmarklet found here: https://maya.land/bookmarklets/readable/

Centered max-width without going all out reader mode.
Meat from carnivores tends to not be very good/tasty for a variety of reasons. iirc most of it is mainly due to the fact that other carnivores process meat similarly to how humans do so it's not as nutritious/tasty. Also many carnivores tend to also kind of be scavengers whose meat is generally quite quite bad.
Commit | https://commit.dev/ | REMOTE (CANADA) | Full-Time | Senior Full-Stack Developers

We hire you directly into Commit AND

- Pay you to find the right startup from a pool of vetted opportunities

- Let you skip technical interviews

- Let you explore startups three months at a time until you find the perfect fit

Our Preferred Tech Stack

- FE: One/some of: Vue.js, React, Redux, Next

- BE: One/some of: Node.js, Go/Golang, Python/Django/Flask, Ruby/Rails, Java/Scala, Rust

Nice to Haves

- Understanding of DevOps: MongoDB, AWS, GCP, Docker, Kubernetes/Terraform, CI/CD

- Understanding of RESTful APIs and/or GraphQL

- Understanding of cloud-native distributed systems and micro services

- Experience with relational databases, NoSQL databases, cloud infrastructure, product design

So, if you’ve got tons of entrepreneurial spirit, and 5+ years of experience in software engineering, apply to Commit’s Engineering Partner Program here:

https://bit.ly/EP_Program
Why bring up another country as a defense?
> You can look at Frances ~70% average Capacity factor in 2 ways either it’s a ~30% cost premium over most of the rest of the world on every power plant.

Insufficient detail.

You'd need to compare levelised costs, and work out whether government subsidies for this-or-that technology resulted in gains and loses that were better or worse than whatever else governments might have spent money on.

There's a good argument to be made that cheap-to-the-end-user electricity is a net good for society, because they can then spend that money elsewhere rather than on boring old electricity.

Besides all that, nuclear needs a lot of cooling capacity, and that's typically come from rivers / oceans, which, if I recall correctly, some rivers in France where recently too warm / insufficient flow to meet nuclear cooling demands.

So nuclear isn't always a good fit for many reasons, but may be a good fit for many other reasons.
Always was. The most reliable product of the nuke industry has always been dishonesty. "Too cheap to meter..." No nuke has ever been operated anywhere in the world without massive subsidy.
Isn't the parent and related answers pointing towards the idea that there's a level of complexity above which you need to be to see those qualia? A single little circuit might not be the one that is conscious, but a bunch of them connected together might exhibit patterns that we could call experience?

Maybe the analogy is that a single DNA molecule is not a living thing but that molecule along with a bunch of others is?

Seems like the problem arises in pinning down what level of complexity is required.
C is necessary because PHP is written in C. So CGO is used to interface with PHP directly from Go, from a Caddy plugin.

Docker is definitely not necessary, but it is the easiest way to ship something that just works. Since you need a bunch of build dependencies to compile PHP, the installation steps are different for every distro to pull those in with whatever's your package manager.
I would place antidepressants under a different umbrella - closer to insulin or other chronically required "maintenance" medicine required to sustain life.

Anti-depressants don't take pain away. In some cases, they make it possible to even feel pain.

I'm ~6 years into my therapy journey at this point and I'm not on antidepressants at the moment, but I have been in the past when I needed them.

I'm fortunate that I was able to stop, and that was partly because I put my work life on hold to go on sabbatical and use all of my capacity on myself for awhile. But that doesn't mean everyone can or should.

I think it's also worth noting that especially now, mental health issues are increasingly caused by advancements in technology we don't yet know how to cope with, and from which there's very little escape.

Meds allow one to do the hard internal work that would be significantly harder to achieve if they don't have the capacity to keep a well functioning life up and running.

I think only embracing one or the other exclusively is where things start to go wrong, and what I took from the article.
Cathie Wood's Main ETF Closes at Five-Year Low in 78% Drop from Record
I don't think so. They're saying, just mandate diversity, rather than trying to develop complex processes that are judged on how diverse their outcomes are. Which is a fair point.

But, the piece I think OC is missing is that another worthy objective is to reduce bias, which may or may not lead to diverse outcomes. So, that's why it would still be worth doing something like a double-blind coding test if your objective is solely to reduce bias.

If your objective is to boost diversity, then OC is right that a double-blind coding test is a complex route to get to that outcomes and that a different, more direct and explicit route might be better.
One thing that surprised me about ‘A Thousand Brains: A New Theory of Intelligence’ by Jeff Hawkins was how many different types of computer simulations currently exist for approximations and parts to your experiment’s steps.
a billion seems like such a huge number when you consider its referring to giant crabs. Had no idea there were that many; but never really thought about it. Seems insane for there to be that many let alone for that many to be missing.
> The Spotify algorithm, Amazon’s recommendations, they’ll never, ever show you Rod McKuen. Those are designed to direct you towards things that other people like right now. But thrift stores, used bookshops, and Goodwills are, accidentally, perfectly designed to show you things that people liked decades ago, then stopped liking.

I've often thought of and lamented the former idea. That the serendipity of the algorithms is less serendipitous than browsing a local record store. But what I've not considered much is that we, digital age folk, leave nothing behind. When I was young my mom had a pile of 45 rpm records. It was great browsing through those as a kid, knowing what my mom was into as a teenager. What do we leave our children? Our Spotify account? It's just not the same. Records have character. Worn dust jackets, scratches. A physical human held and cared for these. It's a snapshot of a point in time. Newspaper clippings, ticket stubs, it's all going away. They can look at a long-dead iPhone 3G and wonder what music or videos I played on it.
Musk Tweets Complicate US Diplomacy from Ukraine to Taiwan
The big win of Docker for me is parity between dev and prod. I absolutely run on Docker in prod. It is not just a dev tool.
> Overfishing is a classic problem of "Tragedy of the Commons". The oceans are the commons.

> For example, nobody is predicting a catastrophic decline in the population of pigs, chickens, and cattle.

That's a great point.

So true...

It's hard to get people to care enough to do anything about it until enough people are affected.

Which is no fun for the sea life and poorer humans waiting for things to get bad enough that sufficient action is taken.
No problem with that. The reporting happens when you deposit the money. At that point the question is one of, "from whom did you get all this cash and how did they get it?"
Who said we need to put the solar cells in Sweden? We could put them anywhere. Sweden is already producing enough low cost energy to meet its needs, only prices are high because we are exporting it to other countries willing to pay. If Sweden wants to invest in power for export, we could make that investment anywhere.
I agree, the second reason is that India is also buying French equipment.
> Step 3. Customize it from our user friendly nocode UI and deploy

What is a real world example where someone with no experience deploying smart contracts would use something like this to deploy a smart contract?

I just don’t see it. If you don’t even know how to deploy something, how could you possibly have any place deploying something, let alone modifying or vetting the source?
discussing: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33192152
I mean... compared to other animals, of which some don't even kill you, before they start eating you... we're still better than a lot of "nature".
Heard back from Jared on their Discord.. indeed, it's not bundling yet.

https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/issues/1169
How are you able to implicate the regulations here directly? The fishery collapsed 90% in 2 years, something else is at play.
The version of that graph in the readme links to `bun/bench/react-hello-world` [0] which makes use of `react-dom/server` so it is a slightly more involved test than sending plain `hello world`

On a local 4 core VM, generating the load locally:

Deno.serve() appears to be particularly bad for me at this test until you crank up the concurrent connections (>500) it gets up to 2k rps but it also falls over after that load.

The `react-hello-world.node.js` server in node peaks at about 1.5k rps @ 32 connection

Bun running react-hello-world.jsx gets 8k rps with 32 connections. This uses a customised local copy of `react-dom/server` where [1] at least the `escapeHTML` function is switched for bun's native implementation, and this appears to be packaged (or will be?) with bun [2]. I'm not sure if anything else is different here as the bun packaged code is still minified. The `bench/snippets/react-dom-render.bun.js` [3] test comparing these only show the bun version of `react-dom/server` to be 1.5 - 2x faster on this VM so it appears there is something more to it. Maybe everything `react-dom/server` normally stresses is optimised in bun? or `escapeHTML` is very large on the flamegraph.

Running the react-hello-world.node.js server in bun results in about 1.9k rps @ 32 connection

Running react-hello-world.deno.jsx in bun doesn't work.

Futzing with react-hello-world.deno.jsx to load the cjs react builds will run in bun at about 1.9k rps

0: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/tree/bun-v0.2.0/bench/react-h...

1: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/blob/bun-v0.2.0/test/bun.js/r...

2: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/blob/bun-v0.2.0/bench/react-h...

3: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/blob/bun-v0.2.0/bench/snippet...
I don't think those will really ever make a noticeable dent in the market. Most people don't want plant based burgers, especially with the negative reputation of soy and masculinity. I think lab grown meat will be the future. If you are able to present it in packages that look exactly like the cuts that one can currently buy in the store I see no reason they wont catch on.
A county can’t subsidize it’s own power, it’s got to pay what it costs. Producers, distributors, and consumers of electricity within a county can receive subsides, but that runs into all the usual issues with planned economies.

Arguing about how efficient subsides are vs other spending ignores the option to not spend the money and have consumers directly pay the bill. This normally results in greater efficiency because consumers can chose to say lower the thermostat and spend money on something else etc. People will argue for subsidies to deal with externalities, but markets can equally respond to simply taxing those externalities.
A key issue is also that even within mental health services there is animosity towards psychiatry.

Whatever one thinks of antidepressants or antipsychotics (maybe less mood stabilizers I think), psychologists hate them. And I think while psychiatrists see psychology as helpful for their patients, psychologists can see the use of medications as a failure.

I could say more but I think I'll just leave it at that.
Sure it's possible to live in a terminal, assuming you're willing to impose shit like this not just on yourself but upon everyone you interact with: https://stallman.org/stallman-computing.html#internetuse
they flopped because they're expensive. I've tried both. They're both more or less edible. But impossible burgers are more money than just buying beef, and not as good. Why is this pea protein more money than beef?
In order to inform the conversations in these comments here are some predictions on Nuclear vs Renewable usage in the UK grid from the National Grid's (UK energy grid transmission network owner + operator) Future Energy Scenarios report - https://www.nationalgrideso.com/document/263951/download

Short Version is here - https://www.nationalgrideso.com/document/263861/download
In principle it could be okay if everyone agrees. There may or may not be something wrong with it, depending on what they agreed to and if they’re lying to anyone about what they’re doing.
The big difference is that HN has a competent, paid moderator that moderates almost entirely according to a set straightforward, transparent rules. Reddit is "moderated" by a collection of volunteers who moderate according to vague, arbitrary "standards" that largely hinge on the cultural and political beliefs of the moderator and on astroturfers trying to control narratives.
Just a note:
The money-laundering system this criminal is part of is called a 地下钱庄 in Chinese or "underground banks" (https://fintrac-canafe.canada.ca/intel/advisories-avis/bank-...), originally started in the 1980s in Mainland China when free-market reforms brought non-regulated "banks" (more just a group of people calling themselves a bank) and informal "loan" companies/loan sharks, they were soon co-opted by corrupt officials to bring money out of the country and since about 2018 any Chinese citizen who wishes to bring money for big purchases like real estate investment outside of China uses a form of underground banking since China puts an annual limit of $50,000 USD on money that can be taken out of the country (https://nhglobalpartners.com/moving-money-in-and-out-china-r...).

Technically speaking, if you want to exceed the limit, you can send in an application form to explain and hopefully get approved to take out more money than that $50,000 limit but the original intent of this law was to restrict money flowing out of China and it is very hard to get approved beyond the limit.
Geothermal doesn't really work for most places, since you'd have to drill down for tens of kilometres to get the required temperature. If you can use it then great, but it's a rarity.

> Now why is it so great compared to, say, solar

Works at night, works in winter, doesn't take up half the country in surface area, has a constant output throughout the day, costs slightly less per kWh (may vary), provides waste heat that can be used for central heating, etc.

Now sure if you live on the equator where it's always sunny and happen to have a large reservoir nearby you can use for pumped hydro storage, then yes it's probably the better choice.
Creator died 2 years ago https://www.eevblog.com/forum/chat/marcel-van-kervinck-(giga...
Hello, I'm Quentin, Meilisearch's CEO. Meilisearch Cloud is encrypted at rest. We're using, at this time, a k8s with replicated and encrypted persistent volumes. We just didn't talk about it yet.
Terminal code review seems to be a niche looking for an occupier. I live in my terminal for editing text and code, running code to generate more text (test output), deciding how to break that code into meaningful chunks and writing about what each chunk does to make the codebase better (git).

This is realistically a huge part of my job.

The next part of the cycle though is always web based. Where are the code review tools that integrate with my editor? Why am I not reviewing someone’s changes presented as a branch in my working copy? Can I do this without having to make the cognitive break of leaving my development environment and moving to a web page facsimile — albeit a very good one — of the place I do my own thinking? Being able to make suggestions by editing the actual code (and testing it) would be huge.

A solution to this would be amazing.
China certainly sees the USA as an enemy. You just need to follow the Chinese sponsored media (Global Times etc) to see it.
That's a good question. I don't think we do. What we know is that we contribute to climate change by burning fossil fuels, at a rate that is orders of magnitude higher than natural effects. We know a lot less about long term effects of burning fossil fuels than not. Given that the global effect (on something so uniquitous as temperature) is so large, it's clear to me that we're currently running an experiment that can drastically change the environment much faster than biological evolution adapts.
Have you tried to look at the objects not placed by humans?
FrankenPHP will perform better than php-fpm though, in worker mode, because it doesn't need to bootstrap fully on every request. In the conference slides, Kevin showed php-fpm had a 12ms request latency, whereas FrankenPHP had 3ms.

But yes, the supervisor plugin is definitely nice to be able to wrap up Caddy + php-fpm in a single container. Makes shipping it easier, especially with the PHP code (because both Caddy and php-fpm need access to the code; Caddy so it can serve static files and check for the existence of PHP files, and php-fpm to actually run your code).