skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think the difference is that you did the inversion symbolically, not numerically. This is about numeric computation not applying algebraic manipulations.
I think the key here is the passthrough, making it an XR/AR experience, thus not disconnecting from reality in the same way as full VR is doing.

This has already been deployed in industrial complexes like Volvo/SAAB for teaching engineers in car manufacturing.
If there’s money in forking a project that just added advertisement solely to remove the ads and take donations away then there’s an avenue of counterbalance.

And of course there’s an inappropriate audience to my original comment. That’s life.

Edit: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33175839
https://megous.com/dl/tmp/3add845b7e814de9.png

There are bunch of interrupt statuses around frame capture: RIS_FRAME_IN, RIS_FRAME, RIS_V_START.

Not sure why you'd decide to use V_START for deciding when the frame is in memory. VSYNC start is sent at the start of a frame and it's documented as just a interrupt that is directly triggered from the MIPI CSI sync signal in the datasheet.

quote: "The incoming hsync and vsync control signals from the camera are connected to interrupt
logic. It is possible to trigger on these signals for an event triggered configuration during
processing."
Vuln in Vm2 Sandbox Module Enables Remote Code Execution (CVE-2022-36067)
Managing complex business logic in SQL using Common Table Expressions (CTEs)
> The point in contention appears to be whether or not Wikipedia funnels donations to left-wing causes.

Did you actually read the article? This point is not made anywhere in the article.

No point in discussing this further.
Both forth and lisp seem similar to me. They have a "three sentences to explain how everything works" vibe. Forth uses a stack and so "reverses" the order of things. Lisp uses trees and so "indents" everything. I wonder if there is some kind of underlying rule. If you want "one syntax to rule them all" then it has to be recursive and so there's only a few options: stack, tree, etc. Hmm well recursive isn't the right term here. Maybe somebody who actually has thought about this can correct me.
Posting in the monthly Hacker News "Who wants to be hired?" is the best interviewing/hiring experience that I've had, and you can say pretty up front that you want a remote job.
On the internet, it's really hard to know if the person knows that those parts are wrong and just wants to ask a question, or if they don't know what they're wrong and they're going to get tripped up by them.

I've also seen quite a few instances where the person needed fundamental corrections for their problems before their main problem could even be addressed, and they absolutely refused to accept those basic corrections first. It makes it impossible to help them with their real problem.

The tech support example of this is when the phone tech requires someone to reboot the device before they'll continue diagnosing the problem. I only worked phone tech support for a year, but in that time I had quite a few people who thought they knew better and refused to reboot the device when asked, but when I forced them to do it, the problem fixed itself. When it didn't fix it, I was able to get on with the rest of the diagnosis.

When I first took that job, I even let them refuse to reboot. After a handful of times that I couldn't figure out what was wrong because it made no sense, and finally rebooting fixed it, I followed the company line of requiring the reboot up front after all. OTOH, I did believe them when they said they rebooted it already. If they lied about that, it generally caused it to be a very long, frustrating call for them, and my call times were already too short, so I didn't worry about it. (Yes, too short. My call times were low enough that it looked like I might be just getting people off the phone without fixing things, though of course none of my recorded calls showed that happening. My boss literally told me to chat with the customers more.)
Project Cybersyn: Cybernetics in Allende's Chile
The root user is not an IAM user and probably is not counted among those statistics. Enumerating IAM users won't include the root user, so it depends on how exactly they got that 40% metric

(Root user ARN is arn:aws:iam::555555555555:root versus IAM users which have ARNs like arn:aws:iam::555555555555:user/USERNAME)
Probably not that much if you are not looking forward to a remote development:

- new UI (they couldn't change it in any meaningful way without breaking workflows, but with a new IDE there are no existing workflows)

- single IDE for all languages (it was possible for most of them with IJ ultimate, but for e.g. Python the experience was slightly worse than with PyCharm)
Agreed...somewhat. Sometimes there is a hard XY problem, and sometimes not. People who care about interacting with other people like actual people would, and have the time for it, would say "I think you may have this XY problem for these reasons. But I may not fully understand your situation. Thoughts?" And then be open to the possibility that the asker is allowed to discuss X even if Y would be an OK solution.

XY Problem in an Ideal world: Consider that Y, not X, may be the best route. But feel free to respond and discuss how your problem relates to X and Y.

XY Problem in actual forums: You're wrong. X is bad, you should do Y. X is forbidden knowledge. You're not even allowed to ask how X compares to Y. Y is axiomatic.
More than just that, to really have a sense of your own avatar in VRChat you need a model which you either make yourself or you pay someone else to make.

Meta is going for a frictionless Memoji like avatar that let's you get going with something that can represent you.
1. Learn to deal with criticism.
2. Ask yourself if your architectural pattern is, in fact, the right one; once confirmed, ignore the haters. Or embrace them.
3. See 2 above.
4. See if Y does solve your problem while meeting your overall criteria. If it does, ask yourself if you are bound to X.
In the 1990s Virgin released a 2 CD sampler followed by a whole series: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Brief_History_of_Ambient https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_Ambient_series

The first pair of CDs is basically a "who's who" of ambient artists up to that point.
> Guess we should define what Winning means

For a for profit company, profit is winning. “Market share” never paid a bill. There is a reason that Apple has been one of the three most valuable companies in the US since 2011.

They almost went bankrupt once because:

- supply chain issues: they thought that users wanted low end Macs and they manufactured too many of them and not enough high end Macs. Everyone agrees that Apple now is the best in the world when it comes to managing their supply chain

- the processors they were using were behind performance wise. It was hard to compete when Apple was only selling a few million Macs and Intel could throw money at performance thanks to having the entire PC market. Now Apple sells about as many ARM based devices as the entire personal computer market (not including servers) and has higher margins to invest. Again no one is saying that Apple doesn’t have the best processors.

- the operating system was far behind the competition. That’s definitely not the case now. Apple has shown to be far more nimble than its competitors.

- there was a dearth of software for its platform. Now that’s definitely not the case except for computer games . The PC gaming market is small and declining.

- They didn’t have any cash on hand. Apple has $200 billion in cash now and it’s doing all it can to throw off cash via stock buybacks and dividends. It could easily have more if it saw that it needed it down the road

https://www.investors.com/etfs-and-funds/sectors/sp500-compa...
Not necessarily. If you're expecting house prices to fall in the short term and interest rates to rise, it's better to wait.

I for example wouldn't be jumping in just yet into the UK housing market. Plus renting can be cheaper than buying, in that case it isn't worth jumping into the market either.
Only if there are more than 2 groups.

If there are two groups (and in addition they are roughly equal size) those are entirely interchangeable as there is no logical "standard" to compare to except eachother
I imagine they just log in to the console and activate/deactivate them. But that seems like more steps than necessary. Ideally you'd just use aws sts. In short you request a temporary set of access keys, and authenticate the request with both your access keys and mfa as part of the request. This returns a set of short-lived credentials that you then use. By using a policy attached to the user/role you make sure that the only thing they can request is a set of temporary access keys, with all kinds of conditionals, like ttl, source ip and mfa.

You can quite easily monitor cloudtrail for malicious activity and use cloudwatch to notify you when someone uses your credentials from, say, an unknown IP, outside of working hours, etc.
I've been there. It's very f*** cool. It's sort of like the old underground metro subway stations in Sydney australia. You know the old circular key line with Martin place museum Hyde Park these type of stations on them? I can't remember all the names now but they have that old tiling and the long pedestrian tunnels and I mean just a fantastic kind of vibe to go into them and this tunnel is like that but it goes under the water.

I think there might be a similar tunnel in Antwerp, Belgium (great city, awesome Jewish bakeries) I seem to recall having transited such a place in that region too.
White House working on cybersecurity labels for IoT products
I had heard about the XY problem[0], but never of XY problem solvers. I don't remember encountering one, do you really find them that frequently?

[0]: https://xyproblem.info/
Gnome is getting ready for next-generation Linux smartphones
So: you need to learn how to be a chef. Off you go to VR chef school for... a few weeks.
Congrats, you qre a chef now. Was it worth the hardware yout wont use qgain?
Yep, this works just fine:

int compare(const void *a, const void *b) {
return *(double*)a - *(double*)b;
}
If you want someone to answer questions in an answering style of your choice, consider hiring a consultant. I'm not sure you'll find what you're looking for for free, in volume.
I don't believe this is true about Stack Overflow. This is why it works, that's its entire model.

The insufferable pedants don't stop correct answers.

Except if you are asking questions that have no answers.

Which is most of Stack Exchange but not Stack Overflow unless the question is badly worded.

Do you have an example on Stack Overflow where this has happened?
Voice interpretation using AI is very nearly there, it's the only input that isn't finicky.
The Purple Beggar - http://thecodelesscode.com/case/170
Possible? Yes.

A good idea? No. If you need to ask, you will have regrets.

A fresh install would be faster, easier, safer, and more secure.
> In one much-discussed incident, a 2008 Air Qantas flight over Western Australia fell hundreds of feet twice within 10 minutes, injuring dozens of passengers on board

This was Qantas Flight 72 [1] and should be of interest to all critical system engineers.

There was a fault, an unidentified cause that corrupted data in ONE of three redundant Air Data Inertial Reference Unit (ADIRU)s.

The fault might have been a cosmic ray incident, it may have been EM interference, the usual array of software bugs, software corruption, hardware faults, etc.

The serious design issue was the spike in one unit was badly and incorrectly handled by the "failsafe" logic that was there to ride out bad juju coming from one of three redundant units.

Shit happens, its nice to have toilet paper thats effective when things are about to hit a fan.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qantas_Flight_72

Full Air Safety Report (313 pages)

https://www.atsb.gov.au/media/3532398/ao2008070.pdf
Pushed up a LICENSE document (MIT).
> Safety is not a binary value

Exactly. Encoding logic in types doesn't have to fix all problems all the time. It's sufficient if advantages outweight the costs.
Lack of necessity of a meeting is the real killer of productivity.
Slack created the category and had a 2 year head start, the fact that they are being rapidly replaced by teams in many office environments has little to do with specific features in teams vs slack. It’s entirely because you get teams “free” with the e5 office license that you need to buy anyways for outlook, excel, etc.
> I find better help going into very specific communities for the technologies I'm having issues with.

Probably true for some sites and not others. I would definitely say the more niche you go in subreddits, the more helpful people are, but that's not really true of Stack Overflow communities.
It's more than $120/year for an employee. https://www.jetbrains.com/idea/buy/#commercial?billing=yearl...

Reduced pricing in year 2 and 3, but up front it's $600/year.

And... while someone's base pay may be a lot, these sorts of 'extras' might come from a different budget. And when there are a dozen services you're paying $20-$50/month/seat for, I know some managers start to scrutinize things a bit more. "Can't you just use the free version like other people do?"
My Note 10 has corrected "you" to "U" - I'd seen the word switch before my eyes. Nevermind that it corrects "i" to "U" sometimes as well. And I've never written a text ever with that lazy contraction of "you". It's like the stupid is being forced upon us.
Wikipedia/Wikimedia is worth hundreds of dollars per year to me. I occasionally throw $20 at them. It is a steal. I never asked myself if they have too much money or if they are using it "correctly".

The main donation page doesn't seem bad to me. Nowhere do they claim they are struggling or may go under. In fact, they say "thriving" and that a small donation will keep it thriving for years to come.

To those upset with them, what would you do? All of their other projects are about free information. Are people upset about wikidata or wikiversity exist? Should they have only done Wikipedia and stopped? Should they not ask for money until they are desperate and in a dire situation? Should they not use any marketing speak and say, "we have hundreds of millions of dollars but would like more please."

Comparing them to FAANG/MAMAA, it is no comparison at all. The value is great and pure: nice, fast, simple, useful interface. They don't have malware, ads, tracking scripts, popups, spam, or dark patterns. Unlike social media there is no envy/depression side effects. They don't try to get you addicted and gamify it. They don't push controversial news just to boost engagement. They respect your privacy, ublock origin has nothing to block on their site.

It seems like Wikimedia is getting hell on here for having very high standards and maybe not quite living up to people's expectations. Whereas the FAANGs have zero standards, don't respect users at all, are 100% profit driven (and already have vastly more money), but they are ok because... some reason.
That's like going in to a store and calling their product displays ads.
There are a number of cooperatives that are very successful. Not in a capitalist way but providing the workers a honest and good life with much more freedom them usual companies. There is a good example in Brazil https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344119511_Flasko_A_...
I mean, no zone is really pedant-free. More of a low-pedancy zone.
Thankfully, there are browser add-one to restore right-click functionality.
Answer: "the meeting is mandatory, so you can't leave"
I don’t get the sense that horizon workrooms targets any of that. It appears to have a goal of recreating normal conference rooms with virtual tables, whiteboards, TVs.

I can imagine that VR in general has some applications that are valuable, but this particular article is about the potential of replacing normal voice and video calls with avatars in a virtual conference room.
Batteries are getting cheaper quite rapidly, so don't get stuck in the dead past there.
Worth noting that the author, Daniel Lemire, wrote the great and incredible fast libraries simdjson and simdutf.
Training STE fields could use this.
Am I the only one who finds that a tiny minority of SO answers are like that, and the vast majority are highly informative, reasonable, and respectful?

I searched my browser history for “stackoverflow” and randomly picked out a few SO answers I recently searched for:

"in C++, why do I need to use `this->` when a template derived class accesses members of its template base class?" [0] All of the answers to this question are extremely informative and to-the-point.

"in bash, how do I sleep infinitely?" [1] Again, super informative answers that both answer the question concisely, and then delve into the intricacies of why it's a more complex task than meets the eye.

"why are Python hashes different between sessions?" [2] Highly informative answer that highlights something not easily found in the docs

"apparmor is hanging mysql service on Ubuntu" [3] top answer gives a one-line solution to fix this problem, and explains why it arose in the first place.

Even fairly high-level questons ("what is a Python metaclass?") have great SO answers. In fact, I have that one bookmarked to share with people who ask me, since it's the best description I've ever seen. [4]

I wonder if my experience is due to the sort of question I usually search for: very specific and technical, leaving little room for pedantry, dogmatism, or evangelism. For instance, "how do I flush the Linux disk cache," has exactly one right answer: `echo 3 | sudo tee /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches` [5]. One cannot be pedantic about this ("there are many definitions of disk cache, and it is meaningless to answer your question without clarifying further"), dogmatic ("the disk cache exists for a reason, and there is no reason to flush it"), or evangelistic ("why are you not running BSD?")

[0] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1120833/derived-template...

[1] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2935183/bash-infinite-sl...

[2] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27522626/hash-function-i...

[3] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40997257/mysql-service-f...

[4] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/100003/what-are-metaclas...

[5] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9551838/how-to-purge-dis...
There are many poorly-researched questions on Stack Overflow, though this tends to be generational (and not exclusive to StOflow).
My perception may be skewed by my infrequent use, but strangely math and physics stackoverflows have much less empty posturizing and generally have high quality answers that are thoughtful and helpful. Most matters of "opinon" are limited to the topics that really are matter of personal style - i.e. which textbook is better ("x is better people who prefer y but foo is better if you like bar" instead of the dogmatic "xxx is the only correct book on this topic).
The question is not whether WMF is good, the questions is whether more money will make them better or worse. I think it's clear that the wealthier WMF gets the worse it will be.
Wow I was JUST thinking about this today:

Can there be a hardware random number generator that solely relies on such cosmic particles etc. hitting it?

Bonus: Use it as signs from God (reminiscing of Terry Davis of TempleOS)
I'm keen to give this a go! I'm glad to see Jetbrain has a 'remotes' IDE that'll hopefully work with WSL like VS Code does. I'm really impressed with Rider and the neat IDE features it has for C#, and have been wanting something smarter than VC Code for web development.
I’m pretty sure the verification is going to just be the normal jetbrains license verification service stuff. Since if anything I use has been shut down or offline for about that long I notice it phoning home to check my account license.
It helps to provide all the things you've already tried to fix the problem. It helps the answerers not waste their time, and tells them more about the actual problem based on what you tried and how the problem responded.
I, too, got bothered by fan noise at night, and my server was being hacked.

Well. Hacked as in someone banging their password list against an SSH server that only accepts public key logins, at maximum speed with tens of simultaneous connections, pegging the CPU (and I was running junk hardware, I found that 800MHz Intel Coppermine CPU literally from a mixed waste trash bin). Usually the scripts doing this had the decency to keep the attempts to something like 1 per second which would be unnoticeable.
There are many good resources! A few, depending on your inclination:

- For intuition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNk_zzaMoSs

- For rigor: https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/18-06-linear-algebra-spring-2010...

- For code: https://codingthematrix.com/

- For numerical/algorithmic details: https://people.maths.ox.ac.uk/trefethen/text.html
The study does show the bias is linked to actually having sex.
This is just how tech works unfortunately. You'll find that the more clever individuals simply don't engage with it. You don't see James Dean, or John Carmack yelling about dogmatism, or nitpicking (although their jobs demand some evangelism).
Invest billions. Get traction. Establish a moat.

Obviously Meta may not succeed. Probably won't succeed. This Microsoft thing will be one of many "throw it on the wall and see what sticks". I do applaud their gumption. And I believe that AR and VR will have a very important role for humanity in the near future.
I guess they missed microk8s, snap, or literally anything else canonical has done

I'm no fan of Ubuntu or advertising in general, but advertising their own things is perfectly fine

Especially considering it's a tiny text file responsible for this - don't like it, change it.
You don't think that there is room in the market for more players? Even as the player base review bombs VRC for invasive anti cheat/tampering?
I have read books that after the end of the story had a page or two listing similar books. I would classify that as an ad, but I also consider it the kind of respectful and tasteful advertisement that benefits both the publisher and reader.

Here's what I like about it: * it doesn't interrupt me when I'm in the middle of something, rather it comes at just the moment when I'm the most interested in purchasing a new book * it's just black normal font-size on white background, nothing screaming or annoying. * it's curated and decent quality recommendations rather than whoever-pays-the-most.
The physics doesn't stack up for me. The spacecraft must be lightweight so it can be accelerated to high speeds but it must also have a very large area such that a large proportion of the laser photons hit it. This means a very thin disc shaped spacecraft (a few grams but with a few m2 of area). Whilst this may be able to be constructed it would be incredibly delicate for launch and I can't see how it would have the required strength to avoid it tearing apart under the force applied by the laser photons.

A paper produced looking at the feasibility of such a system https://arxiv.org/pdf/1604.01356.pdf says

>A critical issue will be the stability of the sail. There are a number of perturbative effects. These include laser instabilities and laser mode issues, differential forces on the sail and mechanical modes in the sail, heating of the sail and laser pointing instability.
>This is a complex sets of issues that requires a significant amount of research and development. This will not be trivial.

I believe these issues are show stopping rather than "not trivial" You can never fabricate a probe of small enough mass which has enough area for laser propulsion to work effectively whilst not tearing itself to pieces or overheating (at least not to anywhere near relativistic speeds).
No, but wages do tend to rise with inflation, which is admittedly a double edged sword.

We saw this in the 70s. Where inflation eroded the costs of buying a house quickly, even though the interest rates were also high.