skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> every single bit of memory (including registers) would have extra bits for this, and checks would occur everywhere it's moved or used (even over buses inside IC's, regardless of whether they shift data, addresses, control logic, etc).

That's one of the two approaches used for automotive silicon. The other, which is a bit more expensive but usually considered safer, is to run the same circuit twice in parallel (usually with a few cycles of offset) and compare the outputs. If those outputs don't match, the system is reset into a fail-safe mode.
I have no interest in the metaverse, or socializing at all in VR. I just want to play games and use fitness apps, which I find value in.

That said, there is nothing wrong with trying to expand into the consumer/enterprises.
It's contradictory to claim they're monopolies but also complain that you would have to subscribe to multiple services to get what you want.
All this research appears to be from the 80s and 90s. When women were still largely confined to being homemakers and soft jobs.

Since then research has shown that people tend to have far more negative views of women in power than equivalent men.

I suspect this derives more from the fact that women were simply not allowed positions of power and so if you guessed a woman was a homemaker and/or in a caretaking job like a nurse or teacher you would almost certainly be right.
There's a difference between civil disobedience and just getting away with something because you can.
FWIW, the computer in TFA had 256k each of RAM and ROM, a 256K floppy disk and was running a 5MHz 68k. Fairly beefy for a single-task computer.
> a lot of people including me do not have time to do this every month

This is ridiculous. If you don't have ten minutes of time every month, you certainly don't have time to be watching any television.
Should offering both service and its client app be regulated?
meh, literally. exponentially is just an intensifier applied to a comparative.

its never really unclear which is which. two objects is comparison, one object is process, as in, lily pads filled the pond exponentially. Which modifies filled not a comparative.
I really hate this conspiracy. Before iMessage all messages on iPhones where green. And when they needed to differentiate they chose to make the new ones blue.
I was hopeful, but after playing with it, I'm not impressed!
I have done nothing to bring down price of subscription drugs. But unlike billionaires I have also not lobbied for socially harmful things like shareholder value over everything else, tax cuts for wealthy people, privatized for maximum profit health care, abandonment of pensions, different tax treatment for income from investment vs labor and many other things.
Yes, less o2 reaches the brain. We experience cognitive decline and/or have worse sleep.
iMessage already has interoperability through support for the universal SMS standard.
A lot of people will just delete an app and think there were no side-effects. There was an article here a few weeks ago about people not cancelling in-app subscriptions after deleting an app. Apple will remind you after it deletes it, Google does not.

Logging out might not even be enough, depending on the logic on Signal’s side. Do they use active devices, or just that an account exists?
Using Lysenko as evidence that Marx was anti-science is kinda weird.

Stalin had thousands of Lysenko's critics imprisoned, I dunno how Marx would feel about that, but I have a feeling it wouldn't be particularly positive.

What does Hegel have to do with anything here? Adam Smith was also "routed in Hegel"...
I worked at Intel and it kicked off my career. I believe putting a Cfo in charge of a company will lead to this. I wonder if apple will ever end up in the same situation
Probability exist as a concept in our heads just like god and math does.

Probability can be used to say something about closed systems like a game of poker using a deck of cards.

If 4 aces have been used I know that there will be no more aces dealt. I can explain why there won't be another ace. And even if magically there was one, we can explain that someone cheated or an extra card was accidentally in the deck.

If 3 aces have been dealt and there are 10 cards left there is statistically a 10% chance of me getting an ace, however I have no way of knowing. The card has already been dealt and I will either get it or I wont.

If I play 10 games will I be getting it 1 time? if I play 100 will i be getting i 10 times? I have no way of knowing.

Now if I learn how to read you and know that you blink more often if you get an ace then I have found an explanation for why I might fold. Not based on statistics but because I can read you. I might still be wrong but I have an explanatory model not based on statistics to play against you, one which I might have to adjust if it turned out to be wrong (ex. you know I know so you change behavior) but at least it's providing me with something more tangible (you give clues I might be able to learn how to interpret)

With the probability it's purely based on blind belief, not substantiated by reality.

Now a deck of card is isolated and not really consequential to society.

But now apply this to open systems economics, weather, climate, elections etc. and you will start to see the problems with assuming there is casual connection when you end up turning that into policy.
So what's the overlap of "people who care enough about e2ee for it to matter whether a message they're sending is encrypted or not" and "people who think the lock icon next to the send button in the encrypted messenging app they downloaded is a handbag"

I'm willing to wager it's not as big as you're trying to imply.
The feature is the reason why it is easy to convert older people to use signal: You can keep your SMS workflow and have only one messaging app...
From TFA: "Apple also said that the Always On VPN feature of MDM offers a fix. Mobile Device Management is over my head. […] According to Apple, MDM lets the corporate IT techies force all data leaving an iOS device to go to the company. But, MDM is is not available to consumers."

There appear to be several easy-to-use MDM solutions that cater to small businesses that would also work fine for families. Apple even has one, Apple Business Essentials.
I am more concerned with the people participating in the other side of this exchange. If somebody wants to get a gun out of their house so they can stop worrying about it and want it destroyed, then the money is unnecessary. If the money is their motive for selling their gun to the police, then they should be given fair market value. These programs are calculated to exploit people desperately in need of cash.

How would you like it if you and your whole family were poor, and you learned that your grandmother sold a $1000 rifle for $100 of walmart gift cards because she was desperate, didn't know what the gun was worth, and trusted the police to not scam her?

BTW, many of these "buyback" programs are funded by people like Doris Buffett. Run by the police but paid for by wealthy donors. They can afford to pay fair market value, they just prefer to scam people.
Good points. It seems that arguing or challenging free loaders is considered morally reprehensible here!
How to Compare Browser Extension Web Store Rankings
I was on the laptop doing stuff in plenty of in person meetings as well.
Democracy exists at all because people did not follow a blind adherence to law.

At any rate, "the law" is a body of rules so large and complex that likely almost no one actually manages to get through a month without breaking it a couple times.
Last commit was a year ago. Do you know if it is still being developed?
Plastic, at the time, was simply better. It is lighter, not brittle, and cheap to mass-produce. Shipping costs are greatly reduced.

Consumers benefit from cheaper pricing, companies get better margins, everyone wins.

Now we see the externalities, or are forced to accept them. But it's not just the consumer's fault. Lots of cheaper items went directly to profit and not to consumers.
6 months for me also for work. Just naturally started using my personal 2012 macbook for everything non work.
Hence why I harp in on two specific points "You don't want to piss off blind people" and "You don't want cross browser compatibility to suffer" - most technical background managers will hear the second point and have a flashback to IE6 or IE4 and immediately start backpedaling, while non-technical background managers will hear the first point and wonder if AADP will end up suing them.

The statement I made is not a genuine expression of the most important reasons - it is a tool to persuade management using cherry picked boogiemen to scare foklks into the right decision... aka a bad faith argument made for the best of reasons.
Thanks I learned something!
Sure, but as far as I know, they haven't stopped loading up the home editions with trash.
A function-based typology for Earth’s ecosystems
Variability in energy expenditure is much greater in males than females
I wasn't very clear. She had a mac laptop around 1998 or so.
why do you think that growing up in a full family is an advantage?

by the same logic we should cut limbs off healthy people in the name of equity, just because disabled people have it worse.
Meetings that need to be done are more effective face to face.

But something like 80-90% of meetings don't qualify, and in those cases zoom is a godsend.
None will do RCS so you basically have to use Googles
> how is it stupid when all offers are below cost?

That was his point - in this age of 3d printed and CAM'd gun parts, the cost of production is extremely low. He was getting $450 for a sear - a very small part. Even their rule changes don't fix this - for that kind of $$ I could have hundreds of those CAM'd or even 3d printed in metal, and use the $$ to pay for a decent chunk of a production shop.
had a C-suite exactly like this come in who had a problem with everything i did on day one and squeezed me out with mediocre buddies of his. at a different job, VP shat on an idea I proposed, then implemented it after i left.

extremely common and made me resolve to check out of the rat race because the clear message is that companies are not meritocracies and power speaks a lot more than logic.
Economists assume a utility curve in the same way that physicists assume spherical cows. They are a useful abstraction which help explain many things, but don't reflect reality completely.

https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/BehavioralEconomics.html
You can though? At least I've had the experience of making eye contact.

As for vibe, the tech is getting better for recognizing facial expressions, so that's just a matter of time. Spatial sound makes "local conversations" possible, where people sitting near each other can talk while other people in the room talk, and you get the effect of a buzz of conversation, which can't happen on Zoom. And ofc avatars face wherever their users would like, so you can tell when everyone is focused on the speaker vs doing their own thing.
Yeah. In workrooms non-VR people can still join in. They appear as a video feed in the environment, and they see a rendering of the meeting from that perspective. It's still quite rich for everyone, eg you can tell when VR people are listening to you because they instinctively all turn their heads to look at your video.
TLA+ definitely. The lowest rung on the ladder is actually reachable.
regarding, an FBI attorney falsified information to get warrants:

> In spring 2017, Mr. Page, denying he was a Russian agent, told reporters that he had provided information to the C.I.A. about Russia. An F.B.I. agent who was preparing to sign a factual affidavit to accompany the fourth wiretap application asked Mr. Clinesmith to obtain clarity about whether the C.I.A. considered Mr. Page a “source.”
That led to Mr. Clinesmith’s interactions with a C.I.A. counterpart, who sent back an email referring to Mr. Page’s status as an American citizen and citing the memorandum from August as a place to find more information.
Based on that exchange, Mr. Clinesmith told the agent that the C.I.A. had explicitly said Mr. Page was “never a source,” something his C.I.A. contact later denied saying. When the agent wanted to see it in writing, Mr. Clinesmith inserted the words “and not a ‘source’” into the email before showing it to his colleague. The agent was satisfied and signed the wiretap affidavit without adding any disclosure about Mr. Page’s relationship with the C.I.A.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/19/us/politics/kevin-clinesm...
Then don't enable the default-off setting to allow the app to send SMS?
Id rather not exclude people who dont have an iPhone, either because they cant afford it or believe Samsung marketing.
Comes up quite a bit in the AI space as well.
The integration is Abysmal with a capital A.

If I get a SMS in Signal and I reply with Signal, it sends a Signal message - not a SMS.
I don't understand how men operate among themselves to be honest but I do know that my ability to share my feelings and struggles with my friends and family has helped me grow and survive a lot of hardships in my life. My husband has me for that now, but he only has me for that and didn't have that with anyone in the past and I think it hurt him and he is still recovering. I go out of my way to talk to his family when he is hurting about something for instance because he is too proud to do it himself, and we all don't tell him that we've been worried about him and instead just try to lift him up. It works, but only because he has a woman in his life. When he was single he says he would just sink into depression and engross himself in work and hobbies alone all day. That's so unhealthy to be that lonely and disconnected from others. I think my husband is a pretty typical guy and I wonder what he would be like now 7 years since we met if he had remained single. What kind of dark place would he have found himself in? It makes me worried for a lot of young guys. It's like they live in a self enforced solitary confinement.... Solitary confinement drives people nuts.

Should male culture become a copy of female culture? That wouldn't work I don't think because I think men have different personality types and tastes on average but it doesn't mean that they can't learn to express their emotions and build friendships with people where they feel comfortable confiding their hurts and fears to each other. Just a basic support network really....

And speaking of friendship, that's another area where me and my girlfriends have noticed that pretty much every man in our lives struggles. It seems like once a guy leaves college his ability to make close friends drops to almost zero. Meanwhile I've made some of my best friendships in my 30s at women's meetups.
> Poorer folks are probably not looking at average car ownership costs

That’s part of a vicious cycle down. Rent or mortgage checks are visible so people minimize that and then accept a long commute. People who buy cars based on the monthly payment often pay high interest. A farther commute means hundred of hours a year sitting in bumper to bumper traffic. A drive that’s half an hour on the weekend can inflate to an hour during rush hour. Way too many people consider housing+transportation as separate budget categories.
Oh believe me, I know. I don't know about you, but I've been having to deal with these people for over 2 decades now, with only a few moments of respite.

I can't begin to tell you how much I have to say on this subject. I've already written and deleted multiple paragraphs due to the potential of my words being against this sites rules.
> >This analysis is so shallow it's practically Libertarian.

> Said the guy who has done no actual analysis, and instead just asked questions. I think we've reached a second peak of HN here.

Ah, you've misunderstood the point of my post. It wasn't to argue against them. It was to point out that what they presented isn't an argument.

For what it's worth, I don't even disagree with "capitalism isn't the issue". I think a big issue is, as my questions would lead you find if you kept exploring, that people mistake economic and political systems for moral ones. Capitalism isn't moral. Or immoral. It's amoral. As such, it's not a valid answer when raising moral questions. Capitalism isn't the problem. The problem is that people accept "capitalism" as an excuse for immoral behavior.

My rhetorical goal is to get the person I replied to to expand their thinking. Spend less time quoting the Libertarian party and their conflation of profit and morality. Think about how systems interact with each other when applied broadly. Think about whether the systems in use are even appropriate for your goals. And above all, to remember that nothing ever has only one "the problem".
Basically I kept trying; IMO several “failures” were necessary. What really got me over the hump was taking up new hobbies that I couldn’t do hungover, and resetting my social life (meet friends for lunch, not drinks, etc). After a year or so of not drinking I now do have drinks every so often, maybe once a month, but my relationship to drinking is totally different now. I’ve become one of those people who feels sleepy and kind of gross after two drinks.

Psychotherapy helped with the hating myself when I failed (which was almost worse than the drinking itself). That was a major issue.
I can't believe they're making a site for individuals with ADHD that uses that many carousels.
Terrible, made my stomach sink. I got non-technical people to use Signal. They were happy for years but now they are going to be very upset by this and the problems will flow down to me.
Why is Newton’s Method not used more often in ML? I know Newton’s method requires the 2nd derivative while Gradient Descent family of algorithms only requires the first, but shouldn’t Newton’s Method be just as straightforward when using autodifferentiation since the process is just a computational graph graph transform using a lookup table?
Parent post said the desal is cheaper than importation, which counted for 90%, so it doesn't seem insane on the surface.
>Adam Smith was also "routed in Hegel"...

Adam Smith published The Wealth of Nations when Hegel was 5 years old, and died when Hegel was 19, and hadn't published anything yet.
Because neoliberalism was born as the "allopathic medicine" of economics basically. A snarl word.
Ah, nice, thanks. I didn't see it in my initial F-Droid search.
> Jordan Peterson spews a bunch of nonsense about fighting dragons and embracing suffering

Fighting dragons - Buy into the hero's journey / have big aspirations / reject inertia.

Embrace suffering - delayed gratification / you're entitled to nothing / hedonism doesn't work.

Really, at its very core it drives home ideas of male expendability. You will be loved if you can provide, so 'clean up your room', start providing and if still no women want to be with you, then we can talk about it.

I don't see why you'd call it a "bunch of nonsense" when his messages are merely digestible morsels of the most prevalent traditional thought. The metaphors are obvious enough really.
It is adult versions of Aesop's fables & Panchatantra. It is the exact opposite of 'a bunch of nonsense'. They are the most well understood civilizational cliches of humanity.
My understanding of passkeys is that they are using WebAuthn under the hood (hence the nod to the w3c/FIDO at the end, and the fact that the passkey in the screenshot was associated with tribank.us).

They are solving a very real problem. WebAuthn uses private keys, but those private keys are tied to the device where they were created. This is a blessing and a curse.

It's a blessing because it eliminates a whole trove of phishing attacks. After all, if no one can get the private key, they can't steal or share it. Well, of course they could steal the actual device, but that's orders of magnitude harder than stealing online credentials (points to https://haveibeenpwned.com/ ). That's a good thing.

It's a curse because the same person logging in from their ipad, android phone, and desktop PC needs to set up WebAuthn three times. For each domain/website (broadly speaking). If they only set it up once and lose the device, well, they are either locked out or need to have another means of account recovery (username/password, calling a customer service rep).

This curse is what passkeys managed by Apple/Google are attempting to solve.

I believe the WebAuthn 3 draft is going to try to address some of this: https://www.w3.org/TR/webauthn-3/ but that's based on what a co-worker said. A quick scan didn't turn up anything.

If you want to know more about WebAuthn, I wrote a lot more here (my company is going to release an implementation Real Soon Now): https://fusionauth.io/learn/expert-advice/authentication/web...
The 21-22 annual plan [1] just shows "Technical Infrastructure" as 23.8% of "Programmatic", which is 76% of the budget, so 23.8% * 76% = 18%, or $27m.

"Technical Infrastructure" includes "all the engineering and technology" though. I'm not sure if a breakdown which includes server costs is available? I remember it being a pretty small piece of previous budgets.

[1] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2b/Wikimedi...
Oh, okay. Thanks.
This is the only correct approach.

It takes barely any time to rotate services (ten minutes per month max, and you could probably even automate it - I'd pay for that automation, ironically), and it provides an extremely strong feedback signal to studios/services that you're not putting up with the fragmentation.

Piracy is a tragedy of the commons situation that provides the wrong feedback signal (industry will just assume it's because people don't want to pay for things), so it actively makes the situation worse.
Strange, these same people loved when the fbi in 2016...
The problem lies in the ambiguity between prescriptive and descriptive statements.

If you describe the average woman whom you have interacted with as being more kind and nurturing, that's totally reasonable. You're just being descriptive.

If you prophesy that the average woman that exists will be more kind and nurturing, then you are making an assertion without enough data. There are plenty of women who don't fit that generalization.

If you proport that women in general are inherently better equipped to be in a nurturing role, then you are being prescriptive. That implies that women should be more nurturing, and that those who are more nurturing should be more feminine. That's sexism framed as benevolence.
Iranian official admits student protesters are taken to psychiatric institutions
Yes, if only there were companies that aggregated all of the content that anyone wanted and charged more for it. I’m sure since everyone is getting the same content they could send it through a cable…

A money losing low margin business (Spotify) isn’t “innovative”
Peter principle people ascend and keep in place for two reasons:

1) they are loyal and take orders from above

2) they are not a threat to those that are above, or those that are going up the ladder (assuming they can be promoted somewhere else)

Also, people tend to go into management when they have kids/get married. These people are conservative/seek stability. They are liked by management because their family ensures compliance and loyalty.

But kids and life situations and advancing age can sap people of the energy to be good at the job they once did. Plus, people do hard work to get where they want to be, and then lay off when they get there, another way that people may appear incompetent: they stopped trying hard when they reached a level of satisfaction.