skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
if you read a bit of the jsx mail documentation you will see that it not only allows you to use jsx in emails, it does that and gives you a complete development environment with even an email client simulator for you to be your email in time real
Regarding how to derive Maxwell’s equations from QED, I’d recommend this lecture: https://theoreticalminimum.com/courses/special-relativity-an...

This derivation is in the context of classical field theory, but QED is only a short hop away through path integrals.

It’s quite remarkable how the complexity of Maxwell’s equations can be reduced to a single term in the Lagrangian - (F_uv)(F^uv), assuming no charges. That’s really it!
I don't, even when it's other person. Actually it's a very annoying sensation, even infuriating. I don't recommend tickling me unless you want to be punched in the face.
To be fair, the problem was predictable already in 2010, so switching to Chrome was a bad idea in the first place. I understood it for webdevs, Googles tools were a bit better very quickly, even if that was a domain for FF previously.

Chrome still fails to render a lot of scaled images though:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37906602/blurry-downscal...

I doubt most users will go back though.
Probability does not exist in reality as it's open ended.
It does however exist in ex a deck of cards and a game that's defined.

Probability is often being misused to say things about reality though. You see that especially in computer simulation whether used in economics, weather etc.

Different initial conditions are put into the models and simulated. And the probability is calculated based on what the majority of those models say.

But those initial conditions are guesses not actual objective explanations. If they were you only needed to run one simulation rather than a range.

A lot of statistics is pure placebo. Purely retrospective.

In reality it either is or it isn't. If you have good explanations like we do in physics you don't need probability.

David Deutsch IMO has the most sane rebuttal of the probability.

http://www.daviddeutsch.org.uk/2014/08/simple-refutation-of-...
Could be a psychological thing: Fear of success or fear of rejection/failure.

When you finish something you will probably show it to the world. So now that world will judge your talent/abilities and maybe you don't feel ready for it.

Apparently it's a common thing. I think Pressfield wrote about it in the War of Art. And it was in another book about childhood trauma I read recently, though I can't remember the title.

I could be way off. Just saying it's a possibility.
Man, I don't know what has happened but the spur for new editors has.been delightful. I have been using Zed for a bit since I made it into the closed beta, but it has been very nice to use. VSCode does the job pretty well, but it just feels more clunky to me, and I have hitches quite often. It is not bad, but I want something more performant while giving me the style of vim and emacs. Zed definitely has some rough edges and some sorely missing features (that are being worked on), but it just feels better to use.

I know so many people probably discount these projects because of the RIIR meme, but it really has spurred more inovations that we should all be grateful for.
i choose a life of a pirate
Bra-Ket Notation
> They should have been raising interest rates well before the pandemic.

Should have, but could not. They did not let the recession of 2008/2009 play out, and the whole system has since only been propped up by the fed. They knew that a recession would commence the second they took their foot off the gas.
Better link (from the actual author of the text, and without referrer tricks for links from HN): https://dreamsongs.com/RiseOfWorseIsBetter.html
Mbuto – Host-agnostic initramfs image builder for lightweight virtual machines
I don't call it useless, I know the power he has, so I think he must have more competitors and we're here for that.
Its a real thing in a very few cases when a train system is really, really, really badly designed. A train system designed to move massive cargo around from mines to big cities.

I live in the country that most people agree has the best trains in the world. Illegal crossing of trains is basically a non issue. It barley ever happens, its almost never discussed, its not in the media much at all.

The amount of issue the country has because of trains is almost 0, with freak accidents where some teenagers swim in the river and then climb onto a railway bridge.

Cars that are being replaced are about 1000x more of a problem for safety. Trains are universally safer and every traveler that moves from a car to a train is a waste improvement in safety.
> You need to be explicit when doing "dangerous" things like injecting scripts. There's nothing accidental about this. This clearly improves security.

What do you mean here? How do scripts get included explicitly?
Mirantis Container Runtime Now Available in Microsoft Azure Marketplace
Creating Authentic Human Motion Synthesis via Diffusion
Pdf is meant for document reproducability. The fact it's glyph soup impedes tampering, which could be considered a feature by those who don't want their documents tampered with. i.e. to be presented to others exactly how they were when created.

If you want an editable document, use a word document instead.

HTML does have page-break-before and page-break-after css properties, but css could do with a "scale element to fit page", "only this element on a page" and "center on page" css properties. Even the print specific css properties that do exist currently are not well supported by chrome. Google really needs to fix that situation IMHO.
Who would have thought that suddenly and arbitrarily adding barriers to trade and migration, key components of many businesses, after decades of having minimal barriers… would somehow have negative consequences …

/sarcasm
Does that actually come from all the instructions of "build your own github profile" with projects in there. And npm package is the lowest hurdle outside cloned first tutorials...
The code amounts to a definition of the unit in a way that’s usable with the C++ standard library, there are no exchange formats or anything. That the repo got archived might mean that they are not planning to promote it, but neither the code nor the unit itself really need any further development—if you have a place where you want to use them, you can just do that.
"Death rate" != "Cancer Rate."

Cancer is much more treatable, these days.

I had a friend that just underwent seven months of chemo for colorectal cancer. Looks like he'll be fine, but it was Stage IV, when it was discovered. Had a couple of surgeries, and radiation. The chemo was the worst, though. He channeled Uncle Fester, and this was a fairly robust, somewhat overweight chap.

So he would not go in the "death" column, but I guarantee that he would not be one to dismiss the seriousness of the disease (or its treatment).
As well as Greece, Italy, South Korea, Mexico, and a couple others: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Countries-with-a-Fix...
>do they use the scientific method? yes. it's science.

"The scientific method is the process of objectively establishing facts through testing and experimentation" [1]

But economics does not objectively establish facts, it establishes subjective facts.

Since every "experiment" is conducted in theory or in a simulation at best, and not in the real market - it pretends to investigate reality when in fact all it experiments with is pick-and-choose model of that reality. That picking and choosing is a very subjective process, hence why we can have chicago and marxists economists both claiming each their "scientific" correctness.

Take a look at the papers that just won the nobel prize. Not a single one of them is a repeatable experiment, because such a thing is impossible in real-market economics. The market changes at all times, and is unique at all times. Economics can only be a science if we accept that science does not have to able to produce repeteable experiments, merely the attempt of doing so is enough to qualify as science.

[1] https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/definition/scientific-meth....
You might not die if you leave that cancer alone, but you might get part of your colon removed, or get a colostomy bag, or get your anus surgically sewn shut til death -all of which not necessarily changes your life expectancy.

Looking for death vs no-death alone as an outcome for medical diagnosis/treatment is short sighted.
Which wasi runtime targets avr? Wasm micro still seems to need an os and only targets x86 arm, and riscv.
Former Fed chair Bernanke shares Nobel for research on banks
There are multiple interpretations (corresponding to your first part). One of them is indeed about “propensities” but the most common ones are about “frequencies” and about “uncertainty”.
Many multimedia formats, frameworks and libraries actually store them that way.

In Mpeg 4, each track header has a “time scale” integer field. For a video track of 23.976 FPS the value can be 23976, or half of that, 11988. Audio tracks typically have different time scale field, often 48000 for 48kHz audio.

In Media Foundation, MF_MT_FRAME_RATE media type attribute is a rational number with uint32_t numerator and denominator. In DXGI, the RefreshRate field of DXGI_MODE_DESC structure which contains a refresh rate of a monitor is a rational number, for instance my display actually uses 59997/1000 Hz frame rate, not exactly 60 Hz.
Makes sense, thanks! I'm not sure what not using the DHT entails, does that mean you can't discover content? That can't be it, so how does that happen? Is it just gossip?
The printed money is funnelled to assets “not inflation”, the war affects bread and butter (literally) “inflation”.
the convenience of a brick and mortar store. currated quality
This is an excellent suggestion! I was going to say that the only place I have seen arrows used are either struct membership in C or the fat arrow function in JS, and neither of those go from right to left. So playing around with F# might help.
Maybe your self is protesting for some reason. What does finishing this particular project means to you? Maybe you should take a small break and create a mental distance. Try to forget your ideas about software and business and listen to your personal specific needs
So close to completion, the only thing that could make it fail now is you. So you go with a comfortable form of failure: not finishing, instead of finishing and not being satisfied.
Thanks, I am aware of the general uses, I was just wondering what you in particular have used it for :-)
>They should have been raising interest rates well before the pandemic.

The Fed in fact tried to tighten during the 2015 - 2018 period but in 2018, politics interferred.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Federal_Open_Mark...
I like that this is basically a customisation of Bootstrap. As much as it's nice for designers and engineers to build a design system from scratch, Bootstrap is a mature, well designed codebase, and you can do a lot worse than using a customised version as the basis for a company specific design system.
I have a question. How do you get the catalogue of books? Have you had to scrape a whole bunch of book stores, or do you make a ton of api calls? Do you store all the catalogues on your server, or are you calling a search on each of these sites live?
So, you want to be motivated to finish the project, aka you're meta-motivated.

But you need cheering on, because you don't think you're motivated enough.

Think about why you are meta-motivated. Why do you want to have the project finished? If there's a really good reason, and you think deeply about that, maybe that helps your motivation.

> I feel like it's becoming a death march that will crush me unless I put in the final spurt needed to get over the line. I'm tired. I feel like every feature I need to implement is dragging me through molasses.

Or... maybe you need a break?

You wrote that this is a personal project. Ask yourself if the remaining effort is worth it. Don't fall pray to the sunk cost fallacy. If the answer is a resounding "yes", maybe it helps with motivation. If the answer is a "no", well, then you have your answer. Then ask why you feel so strongly about wanting to finish.
That's horrible move from Feynman about credit.
> Let's say I use the exact recipe for Coca Cola

Coca Cola recipe isn’t copyrighted or trademarked. They went the third route “trade secret” and interestingly enough, the exact recipe they use is still secret, despite all the years it’s existed.

(Yes, some have approximated it though if memory serves)
I cannot put into words the confused state of your mind that let you produce this risible word salad, so I'll just link this reply here:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33139927
That's a blow, it's such a good conference.
This post led me to check and the 2022 videos have started being uploaded to youtube:

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLcGKfGEEONaDO2dvGEdod...
You can't change the world alone unless you are Steve Jobs. But you can do your share.

What I do is I develop small parts of the software for our (Ukrainian) drones that are used to combat the russian army.
> In reality it either is or it isn't. If you have good explanations like we do *in physics you don't need probability*.

So... are you saying Statistical Mechanics (to give an example) is not part of Physics?

In real life, the amount of information you have (and can have) about a physical process is limited. You can either throw your hands up and say "we can't know for sure", or you can use probabilities to try to get somewhere.

How do you define the position of an electron without using probabilities?
Over 70 cruise missiles in multiple waves. Kh-101 at $13mil a pop makes it $1B just to target civilian population and infrastructure.
> In reality it either is or it isn't. If you have good explanations like we do in physics you don't need probability.

You mean good explanations and observations? You're absolutely right in that if you are able to observe all the relevant information with no noise, you don't need probability. But there are a lot of systems where you can't noiselessly observe what you want – this is where probability is important.
Seems to prove how imprecise and random the russian strikes are. They clearly have run out of precision missiles.
> I'm just starting to feel like no matter what I do to hack through the last items in the list they keep expanding

I feel your pain but in a different area of my life most recently - I moved house and had to clear and pack a couple of rooms before a cleaner was scheduled to visit the next morning. Every time I looked at what was left I thought, an hour or two and this will be done, then after picking and processing a chunk, the remaining workload appeared to be unchanged. As the night wore on I started to feel like the house was cursed by some kind of vengeful clutter spirit, it just went on and on and on... Anyway the shred of motivation I wanted to offer you is that, despite the apparently ever-expanding workload, it did in fact finally finish, and the cleaner was presented with an empty house. I was able to accelerate the process slightly by 'cutting scope' (packing or throwing things I was going to sort) which in your case might be worth considering. Maybe some things can go into version 2?

You've evidently come so far and achieved so much, and you're so close now. Head down, one foot in front of the other, you'll be done before you know it. Good luck!
Good to see a discussion on compiler error messages.

I would like to see the message boilerplate removed from most of those compilers.

#1 We're almost all using some IDE and don't need copies of multiple text lines and irrelevant context.

#2 It's a waste of attention to have to extract the message form lines & lines of text ... I know something went wrong, just tell me (clearly & simply) what and where.
North Korea confirms simulated use of nukes to ‘wipe out’ enemies
Probability, seems to me, cannot be fundamental, because, a machine built to flip a coin with always the same pressure, can be adjusted to always give heads, or tails. In such a setup there won't be probability.

From George Boole's The Laws of Thought, p.244: "Probability is expectation founded upon partial knowledge. A perfect acquaintance with _all_ the circumstances affecting the occurence of an event would change expectation into certainty, and leave neither room nor demand for a theory of probabilities."

Can we deduce from this that nature is not probabilistic?
Sure, but the case with the hospital, the malls and today bombing was just random acts of terror but Russia would claim that 3 different official lies by 3 different officials before they converge one something ridiculous like "in fact we were targeting some military stuff 1 km away but Igor was drunk entered coordinates wrong"
https://hypertextbook.com/facts/2003/ShaniChristopher.shtml

Spontaneous ignition temperature for gasoline vapour listed as 280C, well below "red hot".
> I find it generally more useful link to the (abstract) of the original article, rather than second hand news reports. The abstracts are usually pretty accessible for a somewhat technical audience, they're not written for domain experts only.

If the second-hand news report is well done, it should give you more context on the matter, and so be more useful than the "raw" abstract.