skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes? I wouldn’t even think that’s in any way controversial.
It seems these are job cuts, so it's not just replacing the bottom 15% with others, it's shrinking the size of every team down.
and you can easily just drive your car into somebody to kill them.

DDoS services are almost always purely malicious (you can _may be_ argue that you can use them for pen-testing or load-testing). But cars are not just purely malicious; there's a lot of useful things cars can do, and that's why the dangers of car ownership is outweighed by the benefits, as judged by society - we just have some road rules, and licenses, so that people know to use them responsibly.

Why not the same with an AI model?
The early web promised this too. "Everyone can be their own publisher.". We turned from notepad.exe to geocities then blogs. Now we have tiktok which is almost literally built around the premise of copying eachother. "Please like and subscribe and hit that notification bell" in each and every video about gardening, ancient history, movies or any passion. we have tweetstorms, cut-and-paste formatting on all social networks - linkedin being the most cringy IMO.

The tools in the hands of ordinary people has proven to result in an infinite firehose of ordinary expression. Those ordinary people are reduced to copy-machines that reproduce what algorithms amplify.
But are the drawings any good? Feels weird to have to watch a video instead of seeing the finished art.
And given the inertia, it will take them a decade to realize how stupid this strategy is.
From an algorithmic information theory, i wouldn't choose any easily reproducible sequence.

If you were presented with two array of integers:

- 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

- 95, 10, 39, 45, 6, 47

...which one would you say it's random?

Still, from a frequentist point of view both are.

Where's my mistake?
Repository Definition, Internals, Usage, In a 3-Layer Architecture
> Russia formally annexed ~15% of Ukraine today. How is that winning?

That was a particularly unconvincing propaganda move.
Bytedance recruits extensively in Singapore.
This is three separate arguments:

Is it ok to scan copyrighted works. I think Google Books' win at the Supreme Court shows that yes it is.

Is it ok to process them down to the rawest information?

Is it ok for people to generate content from the raw information (and ok for them to charge for it)?

The last two I don't have an answer for, but I understand the fear of artists and the anger that their hard work is being shovelled into the monster that is going affect their work. But also more broadly the make-up industry, the lighting industry, studio spaces, lens makers, paint manufacturers, etc etc etc.
I need this for my Android phone to compensate for a burnt-in image.
Zitadel – What's New September
You get a new crop 2x a year as opposed to waiting 180 million years for new fossil fuels, so yeah, it's really renewable. As far as net carbon, I'd like to see the math but since plants take carbon out of the air it's far closer to carbon neutral than burning fossil fuels.

Cutting down the Amazon to power cars would indeed be foolish but the same folks protecting the Amazon are the same folks pushing renewables. Likewise, the current president turned a blind eye to deforestation while pushing for more fossil fuels. For the time being if you want to protect the Amazon it's the renewables folks you need to get behind.
hate crime is already a crime. If someone were to want to incite hate, they could do it today just as easily as a hypothetical future where an AI generated image is readily available.

So the problem isn't the AI, it's the forum of haters. Restricting AI usage, in the hope of not having someone use it to incite hate is too roundabout a way to achieve any significant result, while everybody pays a high cost (of not being free to use such an AI as they see fit).
Apple revenue is $400B.

US GDP is $21,000B.

Losing 2% would hurt but it wouldn’t cripple the US.
Location: Australia

Remote: Must be remote

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: Many, but most recently: TS, React, Golang, Terraform

Résumé/CV: https://www.linkedin.com/in/hazelpgarcia/

Full resume available on request

Email: spectralfreelance@gmail.com

Open to freelance/contract work, 4 days per week. Happy to work internationally, but I'll need to work in AEST hours with async comms.
I was being as flippant as i interpreted OP to be. I dont think there is a significant disparity in medical care between R and D. Vaccines were available to all, after that its personal responsibility, you cant cry that your group is dying from something that you refuse to get a vaccine for.
Build Powerful Billing Engines with Lago's Open-Source API
The biggest surprise to me is that he died of a heart attack in an airport, where presumably AEDs are in ready supply and people are everywhere so it'd be immediately noticed. I really thought the survival rate in such a circumstance, even for catastrophic heart attacks, was pretty good!
It could very well be that they didn't pay enough. My hypothesis for why tech pays so well is because success depends very heavily on the quality of the talent, and a few people can be the difference between billions of dollars in lost money vs. a machine that makes billions of dollars in annual recurring income.

It's hard to claim that a project failed because its budget was too big.
That is because the way he draws is part of fascination with his art. The speed of it, that he does not need guidelines for perspective, that he just goes from top of head.

If you are curious whether drawing is to your liking, you can just skip to the end of the video. Or, google his name and filter for images - the filter is in top bar.
If you navigate within algebraic structures with well known properties (which are also verified for example), formal verification is all you need, you can be certain of being bug free.
> The KC-46 program has not gone swimmingly

That's what happens when protectionism gets involved. The Boeing design (based on an existing plane, but with some new systems and a combination of components from different generations of 767s) was chosen over the proven, already in production A330 MRTT. Delays and cost overruns are to be expected.

Same thing with ships, in the end US Navy had to accept it's not that special and it ended up ordering an RFP based on existing off the shelf designs (with the Franco-Italian FREMM winning).
in fact it is exactly UB that allows that. If, say, the standard specified wrap behaviour, a conforming compiler wouldn't be allowed to trap.
The full resolution is here: https://www.debian.org/vote/2022/vote_003#outcome
Lol yes I know I know. I lost my cool as I was writing that damn comment. So frustrating.
Macros in Lisp during compilation often extend the compile-time environment and another purpose is to register information in the Lisp IDE (record source code, record source locations, ...).

> but with a much simpler feature (which is just running code at compile time)

Common Lisp does that with the EVAL-WHEN construct, which allows to run arbitrary code at compile time.
what does "managing out" mean?
So there are various commercial systems that fall under CSPM (or KSPM sometimes) that are designed to assess compliance with different standards.

My purely personal opinion on this is that it's difficult to do well as even with compliance standards automating assessment isn't always possible

For example the CIS benchmark for k8s can't say "Never use cluster-admin" as there are some legitimate use cases, so instead it says "minimize the use of cluster-admin" which can't be fully automated as a check.

To do it well, a company should come up with their own spin on applicable standards, automate where possible (either with 3rd party or internal tooling) and then manually review the things that can't be automated on a periodic bassis (either with internal resource, or consultants)
> If building a $1trn company would be this easy everyone would be doing it.

He didn't build 1 trillion dollar company -his team did. He was just there at the right time and did the right thing when he developed the initial version of Facebook, something any somewhat competent full stack developer can do -and I am explicitly talking about the initial version, not the planet scale real time super systems his team later came up with.

I'd argue if any of us were sent back in time just one year before he started working on Facebook, we could easily be the Facebook founder of that timeline.
This ends, or escalates further, with the use of nuclear weapons by Russia.

People can debate all day on whether Putin is a genuinely and popularly elected President, a totalitarian dictator, or a mafia boss.

But what’s not up for debate is Putin’s absolute consistency.

Putin does what he says, and says what he does.

If Putin threatens to use nuclear weapons, he likely will, the only debate is when.

The real threat of Putin using nuclear weapons shouldn’t stop efforts to shape the desired end-state.

A realistic hope may be HOW nuclear weapons are deployed.

An atmospheric test display over remote Russsian territory that disrupts the test ban treaty and global markets suffer some temporary disruption.

A high altitude atmospheric detonation over Ukraine that disrupts Ukrainian communications, western military support for Ukraine, and global markets suffer longer lasting disruption.

A tactical nuclear weapon detonation over Ukrainian combat units that disrupts Ukrainian offensive, western military support for Ukraine, and global markets suffer lasting disruption.

Western coalitions have disrupted the Russian economy with sanctions, but China/India provide two major energy export customers.

The west is most prone to economic disruption in Q4 Oct-Dec.

In consumer-led discretionary income dependent sectors, Q4 can be 50% of annual revenue with 25% of annual revenue coming from just mid-Nov to mid-Dec.

If I was Putin I would create and amplify tension targeting western markets and consume sentiment from now until Mid-Dec.

Personally, I don’t worry about a Cold War era Cuban Missile Crisis or 80’s Threads/Day After threat of total nuclear annihilation.

But I do strongly believe we are at greater risk of a limited nuclear display or tactical detonation than at any time since August 1945.

Ukrainian forces have a lot of offensive momentum and high morale, which leaves them vulnerable to hubris.

I am sympathetic and in 100% agreement with Ukraine to defend its sovereignty.

But Ukraine attempting to recover 100% of its pre-2014 territory will likely result in nuclear weapons being used.

My hope it that such a nuclear exchange is limited and that the global economic impact is only 1-3x the ‘20-‘22 COVID disruption.
That depends on the team leader and how well they can take suggestions. It's a team, not everyone will have the same background and, probably, nor would it be best that they did.
w jq
Perhaps they're aware how many scientific studies are unreplicable. Or maybe that medical error is a leading cause of death. Maybe they know about thalidomide babies.

Or perhaps they simply didn't want to take drugs pushed by people who actively hate them and demean them at every opportunity.

Or possibly they're aware of the tendency of governments the world over to use emergencies to seize power, as has undeniably been done here.

Or maybe they believe in their own version of "my body, my choice".

Possibly also they don't want to take scientific advice on people who suddenly insist that boys can be girls, and that anyone who disagrees should be banished from society.

It's foolish to think one party "owns" science, and natural that people would bristle when dictated to by perhaps the smarmiest smuggies that have ever existed on the planet.
> In practice I dare you to find compiler documentation for each implementation defined behavior.

For gcc there is this:

https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C-Implementation.html

No idea how complete it is. Also a lot of stuff is architecture/platform specific, not compiler specific, so you won't find it in the general compiler docs but you have to look at the psABI.
But there is a clear distinction between the build system and the programming language. There is also usually much less code in the build system and it will be reviewed with the idea in mind that it could do something dangerous at build time. Reviewing every line of source code with compile time effects in mind could be very hard and sometimes the reviewer might easily miss the fact that something will happen at compile time, especially if it is hidden behind some api.
30% more efficient according to the article.
You are right, but OP asserted that IB (implementation defined behavior) would be needed for this. IB would also allow this, but it is not necessary.

All of undefined/unspecified/implementation-defined allows this.

edit:

Whether unspecified or implementation-defined would allow trap depends on the exact wording. If the wording is along the lines of "[on overflow] the value of the expression is unspecified/implementation-defined" then trap is not allowed. But it can be also "[on overflow] the behavior of the program is implementation-defined", which would also allow trap. Point being, unspecified/implementation-defined also have a defined scope, while undefined behavior always just spoils the whole program.

I'm fine with the UB overflow though.
Double of zero is still zero.
What's worrying, even if Putin is removed from power, who's there to replace him that is fit for the job?

Most if not all opposition has been either imprisoned or killed.
Btw: it’s even worse than that. The perceived dependency allowed Russia to think that they can get away… they thought they could blackmail the West.
not until you click on the right "does this picture contain a high-speed train" image
>Get all the insights of your podcasts and episodes following the market standard with IABv2 guidelines. All of the gathered data is anonymized, with respect for your listeners' rights and in conformity with GDPR, CCPA and LGPD laws.

The first half of this would imply that the second half is a lie...
All you have to do to beat an HR bot is request a JD, the company and a salary. 95% of recruiters refuse to answer this. (At least based on my experience)
Bad comparison. Brain surgeries are a method of last resort. They are unsafe because there are significant knowledge gaps in our understanding of the brain that might take centuries more to fill. Every time a neurosurgeon cuts, they are potentially doing irreversible damage to an important part of a person's consciousness, abilities and memories.

Edit: and there is no way to prevent that damage except by detailed planning and by stopping to cut when the patient (under local anestesia) ceases talking or performing their craft. Other damage can only be detected later though.
Well done team!
Correct. coreboot support for MSI PRO Z690-A WiFi DDR4 (mentioned ADL dream), as well as PC Engines and Proteclti was provided by https://3mdeb.com. Full disclosure: I'm Founder and CEO of 3mdeb.

There are some other boards you may be interested in, which you can find at https://docs.dasharo.com/ Supported Hardware section.

I believe NovaCustom laptops are worth to mention especially that 12th Gen coming soon: https://configurelaptop.eu/coreboot-laptop/
What are NFTs 2.0, and which problems do they solve?
Presumably his finished work is for sale and display so naturally it's a bit less likely to see it up online in an easy viewing format. Check some of it out here though:

https://www.kimjunggi.net/

To answer the question though, yes wildly and objectively talented. Part of why you would want to watch a video is to see how he works, his competence is on full display more so than in the finished product perhaps.
There's one thing that's usually true about every well used copy of K&R, and that's that it always opens up easily and by default to the page with the huge operator precedence order and associativity table, because that's the page everyone needs to refer to the most often, which is usually bookmarked, but in an old copy doesn't even need to be.

That says something about the C programming language design, that I as a deeply stack based FORTH programmer and explicitly parenthetical LISP programmer find horrible.
> We have already escalated.

No we have not!

NATO did nothing to expand. It was those countries that wanted to join! Which brings us to the second point:

> Our foreign policies are one of the main causal factors in the current war

Typical victim-aggressor reversal. It is Russia and its behavior, since forever, that made the neighbors fearful and desire NATO membership for protection against a vicious and aggressive neighbor.

By the way, I speak a bit of Russian, have been to both Russia and Ukraine - East and West of the country - multiple times and have connections to people doing business there since the 1990s and we regularly converse. I'm not as knowledgeable as a real insider, but I'm also far form an armchair commenter. Also, I was a mix of sympathetic and willfully ignorant towards Russia all the way until 24 February. And it was Russian behavior during and accompanying the war, not that I (initially) cared much about the fate of Ukraine I have to admit. I realized I had suppressed and filtered a lot over the years, like most others.

> I think it's time to reevaluate that strategy.

I agree - we need to be much more forceful and less forgiving to Russian threats and atrocities!
What a weird thing to say.
Being psychologically stressed out at work is not in and of itself hostile work environment. Read the US law section in the link you posted. The employee actions have to violate preestablished rights or part of thr employee's contract. Not merely ramping up work expectations and duties to keep your job.
As a software dev, I like using whatever as a local env but SSH'ing into something more powerful to perform any heavy lifting. There's also tools like VSCode Remote that make it almost like developing locally. That said, the most taxing tools that I use regularly are things like video conferencing and "collaboration" tools like Miro. These things are hell.
> Yes they pollute but just hope they aren’t dropping ordinance. That stuff really pollutes.

How so? Usually it’s just nitrate fertilizer. You can actually measure the greening effect that certain large 20th century ears (WW2, Korea, Vietnam) have had on global bio mass.
Some hardware firmware is a binary blob because THERE IS NO KNOWN WAY TO COMPILE IT.

Certain chips are manufactured with an initialization code sequence that is generated very similarly to how an FPGA floor planning works.

It should be made clear this Debian Vote is to include Proprietary Firmware in the installer so it is possible for new users to install and try Linux. If it's not in the installer, new users just perceive that free software / Linux just doesn't work at all. That doesn't help anyone.
> It's all he could really do.

Is it really? At the very least he can refuse to lock/resolve the question and quit. Perhaps not something to reasonably expect for a single customer. Perhaps he really needs that job to survive. But the notion that you are not responsible for your companies bad behavior that you are part of just because you don't make the decisions is absurd.
If the functions are separate overloads there is no need of versioning in the first place.

On the other hand if you change the layout of structures (like it would be the case for bound checked pointers), it is much much harder. GCC has ABI tags, but they only help a bit.

In any case nobody is going to bound check iterators by default, these already exists when using whatever debug standard library your compiler provides and they are orders of magnitude slower than unchecked iterators.
How OTA Insight scrapes HQ hospitality data from more than 100M requests/day
They have been trying to get rid of Stallman last year.

https://www.theregister.com/2021/04/19/debian_stallman_vote/
Building Recursive Descent Parsers: The Definitive Guide
The FAANG paradox : these companies all have this performance-intensive culture with the gruelling interview, "perf cycles", promotion processes, OKRs, etc... to ensure all engineers function at the top of their capacity.

At the same time, their new public facing products have been mostly underwhelming over the last decade. It seems most of the innovation occurred back when FAANGs were 10-100x smaller.

(The AI work is one exception)
Put in a /s if that's how you mean it, nobody can actually hear the sarcasm unless they are next to you and you say what you type out loud.
Dripping with sarcasm.
The new 4x4 matrix multiplication over F_2 has practical applications as many matrix operations over F_2 can be reduced to matrix multiplication.

For anyone looking for the algorithm itself, it is actually given in in one of the extended data sections at the very end of the paper.
You don't "trust" science, it is even the entire point of science to be distrustful: To be ever skeptical of and verify any claims, and always be on the lookout for better theories and findings.

If you "trust" science, you're just being religious. The people who don't just immediately take the words of the CDC or WHO at face value are more scientific than the people who do.
Of course, it is a compiler feature, you will have to recompile and manually (or automatically) apply all suggested changes to the source code.

If you just link against an hardened library, only the implementation of the (non inlined) library calls will be hardened, the user code itself won't see much benefits.

Of course these days we have binary level optimizers, so who knows what it is possible in principle?
Man loses life savings from installing Ledger wallet from Microsoft app store
Sounds like they shot up to better match global market salaries?
As a reference point: the protective bags around monitors and other easily scratched products tend to be "non woven fabric". If you look closely you can see the fibers are going every which way, instead of being in a regular pattern like woven or knitted fabrics.
> I was in Afghanistan, and yes we were.

Your definition of "utterly defeated" is very different and moving of goal posts from what the OP that I replied to used. OP used it in an absolute term, the country itself had to be defeated, like Germany in 1945. And I argued that that was not necessary. Now you don't attack anything at all of my argument, you just move the goal somewhere else. Your scenario is exactly the same that I used. Unless you want to argue that the US capitulated - and not just withdrew from Afghanistan - and Taliban now rule in Washington?

Could we please argue in good faith and not try to play with words and definitions to "win" some Internet discussion and show some anon commenter how wrong they are, using all kinds of dark methods?
This was written by Yusuke Endoh, who also wrote this submission to the IOCCC that I remember being arguably more astonished when I saw it for the first time: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMYfkOtYYlg (ASCII fluid dynamics).
There is no such thing as unstructured data. If it were unstructured it would be noise.
What people call unstructured data is, when they had little to no foresight when designing the original data structures. Any new data fields are just pilled on later and called unstructured