skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You have to have equity for it to matter.

At 7096 startups per batch with 2 founders per startup, that’s 28,384 founders per year with equity. Under current model of 240 startups per batch with 2 founders per startup, that’s 960 founders per year with equity.

960 vs 28,384... or 29.5x difference.

Even if they did each model every other batch, there’s literally no way using current method both batches would out preform the mixed model. Better real world data equals better performance.
The more predominant issue is keeping anything with a lithium-ion battery in checked luggage. They'll crack down on anything from laptops to hearing aids.
Why Saudi Arabia defied the US over OPEC oil supply cut
How Far Can You Ride a Bike in an Hour?
I could evoke Brandolini's Law on this one, but for the sake of other posters, I won't.

>No, it unironically IS useless.

There's an example of why Linguistics isn't useless in _the very comment that you're replying to_: pragmatics. That is, modelling the _purpose_ of an utterance is essential to process it.

Without that pragmatic modelling, I believe that NLP will keep failing to deliver what it should, and it'll continue being just a cute toy to keep codemonkeys busy with their blackboxes. Granted, I may be wrong (I'm not stupid to claim certainty over the future), but I do not think that I am.

>You're welcome to bark up the symbolic tree along with Chomsky, Gary Marcus, and others who are about to fade into obscurity.

Damn, could you lend me that crystal ball that allows you to claim certainty over the future?*

It's perfectly possible that they fade into obscurity. It's also perfectly possible that they get hailed as heroes of language processing. Or anything in between. We, in 2022, are in no position to know it. The same applies to any other linguist that is interested on natural language processing.

Specifically on Chomsky. He often spouts some stupid reductionist shit and, paradoxically, unnecessary complexity to keep that reductionism intact. Even then, his approach looks saner than "NEEDZ MOAR NODES X-D".

>Or you can embrace the bitter lesson

"If I say so then you should accept it" is not a valid argument, sorry.

>which is that symbolic techniques are considered harmful, like the future winners of the AI race have

Another instance of "I KNOW THE FUTURE! CHRUST MEEEE" through your comment...

Checking the link,

>The ultimate reason for this is Moore's law

It's already common knowledge that Moore's Law is dead, and brute force only goes so far.

*That specific sentence is a great example highlighting the role of pragmatics. Humans can easily get what I did there; NLP should too, but it doesn't.
This sounds like a level-headed analysis. Granted, I don't totally understand the history nor the practical nuances of all of the FSF's work, I do have a basic grasp of their overall influence and imprint on FOSS and am a happy Emacs user.

It seems to me that all of this talk questioning the need for the foundation in the modern age is good. The ought to be a bevy of splinter groups advocating and developing for the rights of certain users.
Endurance will ‘decay out of existence’ unless ship is raised from sea
Leaving aside your other points, it's beyond ludicrous to claim that Steven Pruitt controls anything on Wikipedia. Please take more care that you yourself don't repeat random misinformation about Wikipedia.
May I ask you what industry you are in ?
side question from the tweet: is "unhoused" the politically correct version of "homeless"? How is it any better?
You're not working for a big company in Atlanta are you?
Saying it as the person in charge of developing Mastodon, probably the most likely reason more servers don't charge for access is that it's not built into the software, so it would require either customizing the code or manually sending out invites based on external payments (e.g. Patreon, some servers actually do that). I would imagine the other likely reason is that complexity of signing up as a business with your local tax office, charging the right taxes based on where the customers are located, and accounting. I do absolutely agree that paying for your account would make running the servers so much more sustainable.
I actually used to have a 2009 Mac Mini (long since sold); I promise you, it didn't run Dolphin well even at 1080p. It barely kept up to 20FPS on some games.
Line of sight and curvature of the earth.

At 20 miles out, a device on the ground starts losing line of sight, at 20 miles out, a device on an airplane starts receiving horizontal line of sight.
This wouldn't be a good fit for my projects because this still uses Babel and has too many dependencies: https://github.com/JetBrains/ring-ui/blob/master/package.jso...
Is this always the case for photographers? If they are employed by a business and the pictures are taken for pay, wouldntthe company own them? Can you specify the same in a contract with a freelance photographer?
A technical solution is the last thing you want: if you implement a "perfect" technical solution then it removes your feeling of responsibility to try. What you need is the skills to be able to resist the behavior you want to not do. Things like therapy, meditation, CBT may help.

Not all technical solutions are bad. If you're an alcoholic don't get a job in a liquor store. But there's always going to be times you need strategies to make the right decisions.
Age of retirement should be 50. If more people don’t retire, how will the young people find jobs? We are educating everyone these days. The youth need jobs to support their families and buy homes and plan for their own retirement.
The 9400M is still an integrated card. It was better than what Intel had at the time but it still lacked it's own memory and is still terrible by today's standards. Only the G4 Mac Minis and some models of the 2011 Mac Mini have a dedicated GPu.
I read the thread and I still don't get it. They had a bug in some Go code that a lot of people were running?

Does anybody have a GitHub commit to the fix Binance is working on rolling on out?

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bnb/

How did it not drop more?...
That’s going to be frustrating for the twelve owners of Rivian vehicles!
DICOMWeb over FHIR sounds miserable.
Rekieta Law is back on YouTube
Since the ban was posted a couple of days ago I'm submitting the unbanning.

Quick explanation for anyone who's out of the loop.

Rekieta is a Minnesota lawyer who gained notoriety during the Rittenhouse trial for organizing a panel of lawyers and streaming the trial on YouTube with real time explanations and commentary of the proceedings. Support it or not, agree with his political views or not, this is valuable content that provides insight for anyone not in the legal community.

Recently got into internet drama with some people who:
- Tried to mass report him to the Minnesota bar for ethics violations. The board disregarded the claims.
- Mass reported him on Twitter and got him banned from the platform.
- Mass reported him on YouTube and got him banned from the platform.

You can read more in the ban thread [0]

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33102697
Hell yeah someone who gets it. Maybe you can help me: Greenspan wrote a pretty pro-gold standard paper when he was young. When did he turn into an interest rate interventionist? Did he write about it?

Seems like the prevailing theory is that increasing the maximum money supply increases jobs, ala Keynes's buried money jars. But I can never seem to find anyone who addresses the quality of those jobs i.e. impact on the (real wealth)/(money supply) ratio.
I learned a lot from this comment, thank you. If you could add - what would be a good architecture for large RT systems?
i fly exclusively delta, and i always get asked to turn airplane mode on and any services that transmit audio are explicitly banned while on board (Discord, teams, etc.)
If they're relying on government social services, they may well have a whole plethora of accounts to manage that.
Chomsky has been saying that the way to do what we call AI is with statistics since about approximately before you were born. People wanted him to use his grammar ideas to research AI in the 50’s but he declined because he was interested in linguistics, not stats.

Not sure why you criticize a man for having different research interests than you in a completely different field.
The part about the new LED loks legit, but the claim that it's safe for humans is very hard to believe. I never heard something like that, and the claim is not present in the abstract of the research paper. (Can someone read the full paper?) So I guess it's a misunderstanding/exaggeration/fabrication in the press release of the university or the press article.
Uh, no, it was always usability.

Insert any modern chat app and random user can drop a screenshot there trivally, do some basic text formatting, and paste code in nicely colored blob of text, all from comfort of single login in a browser. And now even jump to voice chat or video conference directly from it.

They can also look at what they missed in channel by just scrolling up. Sending files just worked. You just got notifications without extra fuckery. Hell, you get digest with conversations you miss.

That's why modern closed down chat ecosystems won. Coz it's easy for "normies" to use.

Let's take other example, XMPP. It had all that but in network of XEPs that some clients/servers implemented, some not, some just not very well, and some being fucky to config. It wasn't just "login here and get every feature" like it is in modern chat clients.

It had it's one shining moment where both facebook and google offered XMPP way into their garden so you could have connectivity across federation and just have a single contact list but that didn't matter to non-nerds that just used facebook/google talk so once they decided to close their gardens any benefit of xmpp faded away.
Perspective from a computational biologist: Campus hosted HPC means the direct cost pressure is seen as IT staff and hardware related costs. Researchers are encouraged to use the available capacity. This is good.

Externally-hosted HPC means every single compute job is seen as something that directly costs money. This negatively affects the quality of scientific output (research playfulness / creativity / focus on the research / etc).
Curvature of the earth means that an airplane may be horizontal at 20+ miles out, while a surface vehicle is blocked by ground.
This makes sense since only apps (re)built from the ground up would use the SwiftUI lifecycle instead of the UIKit compatibility layer
you can also use a security key or a onetime password from an authenticator app (plenty of options for each) or a separate device logged into Google as your second factor. You have plenty of options
> world where software is always compiled from source code to an executable binary file which exists on the user's own computer

That is ultimately what you need to do if you want the highest level of autonomy (modulo "compilation" being optional). The FSF and the framing of Free Software is an uncompromising judgement, but you're still free to accept compromises.

Do you have a concrete framework that you think would be more worthwhile? Even for any one of the examples you've listed?

My own thinking is augmented with a tower of diminishing Freedom/Trust. My main desktop and laptop run only Free software, period. Their peripherals run proprietary firmware, but they're either isolated from the network (keyboard, mouse, etc) or not fully trusted (encrypted network traffic and disk drives).

I run my biggest use of proprietary code, web applications, in browsers in many different VMs (actually on separate machines). This also isolates their networking to defeat IP-based tracking, since I have to treat them as quasi-hostile black boxes. Similarly when I have to run MSWin apps, virtual machines.

In a third direction, I have infrastructure running Free software on less secure systems (eg VPSs).

In another direction, I have separate machines when I have to fully engage with the surveillance economy, like an Android tablet for banking apps.

Having basic Freedom in my base environment is what gives me the perspective to see each compromise clearly. I understand why I am forced to compromise, what I am giving up, and how I can best protect myself from the fallout of what I've given up.

It's true that I optimized around something other than Freedom, like say ease of use or productivity for a specific task, that I would end up with more Freedom compromises and more of what I optimized for. But I can't see how that's anything other than a Faustian bargain, especially as proprietary software has now combined with ubiquitous network connectivity to undermine Freedom 0.
Rivian needs to fix their truck bed cover system, it's slow and breaks far too easily.
Emacs is a GNU tool, right? Why should they be forced to merge patches that don't relate to the GNU software ecosystem? Adding Applescript compatibility means that contributors who maintain that code require proprietary hardware to fix these issues. The GNU project forbids members from spending donation money on proprietary hardware, even for debugging purposes. You're better off asking why MacOS doesn't have support for EXT4, just because "all the work is already done for them"

If color emojis and Applescript compatibility is such a huge deal, the license explicitly allows you to fork Emacs with these changes merged. Knowing MacOS developers, they'll probably even charge you for it too (which the license graciously permits as well).
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6073096/

> At a broad glance, prostate tumors have, on average, fewer mutations (0.7 per Mb) than other common cancers, such as breast (1.2 per Mb), bladder (7.1 per Mb), colorectal (3.1 per Mb), and melanoma (12.1 per Mb)

I can't find the original article in which I saw it stated that PC has a lower mutational burden but the above might be sufficient.
That only applies to government / government sponsored research. That is different from someone doing their own research
Similar concept : https://md.altilunium.my.id
I don’t think this is about transmission. Rather, it is probably to reduce the risk of thermal runaway of lithium batteries, which can cause fire and explosion.

The regulation also states that such devices “should be carried as carry-on baggage”, that is, in preference to checked baggage, presumably so that the devices are less prone to damage, and cases of malfunction and fire will be more quickly detected.
Yes: https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/8252/are-cargo-...

GP is just making up hypothetical dangers of Li-ion batteries, a popular pastime on the internet.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pizza_Tapes
Thanks, your comment helped me see several things I can work on that would help. I record all kinds of data about usage patterns but don't have a good dashboard for analyzing it yet. And onboarding / email communication are weak areas. Some of the app's best features get minimal usage, and I have a lot of users who sign up, use the app for a day and never return.
More the latter. This could definitely be an issue, looking at my metrics, some of the app's key features have very low usage rates.
Definitely some truth in this, and the way research funding is managed, especially with Federal grants, makes it incredibly difficult to sort out and identify the right solution.
There's a public copy of the (super sketchy) draft toolchain that some of the folks in the lab were working with on github: https://github.com/aggregate/MOG

It's a horrifying toolchain that uses MIPSEL assembly as an IR so we didn't have to screw around with language front-ends, but it pretty much worked.
To Squash or Not to Squash – Musings on Invasive Species
Better to know what old people have to offer and then discard it, rather than pay no heed to them at all..
You could show up at the apartment.
Good thoughts. Discord is a good fit, I'll look into adding that.
Same. I pulled aside peers to show them. I was gobsmacked.

Honestly I'm still impressed. It was astonishing at the time.
I can tell you that NASA is in the midst of a multi-year effort to move their computing to AWS and that yes.. downloading 324 terabytes of data is very expensive but very soon all this data will just remain in the cloud and be accessed virtually.
I don't really know all the legal ins and outs, but you are the artist of the pictures you take and you own the copyright. I'm sure you can work as an employee and you can always sell the copyright along with the work. It used to be back in the day that photos were taken on film, so photographers could retain the film and sell you prints or just give you the film so you could make whatever you wanted. I've mostly been out of the loop since those days, so I'm not sure what the conventions are like these days.

The most interesting legal questions around this recently are regarding monkeys or other animals who take selfies, and whether they can own those works.
> it's beyond ludicrous to claim that Steven Pruitt

Someone with millions of edits does not de-facto have the systems in place, the time, and the power to influence any article he puts his mind to? What I posted is inference, not misinformation, and worth considering despite the downvote parade happening on it right now by pro-wiki shills.

To call what I posted misinformation is a sign of times. Inference is not misinformation and while I have no "fact checked" articles proving he manipulates wiki articles he is a defacto central power of Wikipedia whose contributions are vast. So vast, in fact, they shadow every other contributor by orders of magnitude. If this doesn't concern you I guess by all means, cite wikipedia in all your scholarly works. Isn't my problem, anyway. I don't use it and I don't donate to it. I have no dog in this race.

Ignoring Pruitt my point stands in general. Wikipedia edits spike during times of political strife, elections, major news, etc. They are edited so frequently that it's impossible to tell what is real and fake. This is the principle failing of any truly open system that does no KYC. It inevitably collapses under the weight of idiots (which have more density than smart people). If Wikipedia expects to be trusted authors should be credential-locked to fields and vetted by the community. Except that can't happen because then you'd have to pay for it, and then it's not wikipedia.

I'd rather have vetted experts writing articles on their fields (e.g. an actual encyclopedia) than any random shmuck off the street being able to contribute to an alleged body of "knowledge". Right now I can go contribute to the article on theoretical physics. Something I know nothing about. That should not be possible on any system alleging to be a source of truth.
I've had the same frustration. I want to go from intent to a UI as quickly as possible.

My intuition about solving this is to create components where instead of a select and a radio button being separate components, they're the same component with basically the same API.

And instead of deciding on a spacing between components, you just get spacing more or less automatically so everything looks good by default.
It scrolls on desktop Safari, but it's super "jumpy" as you scroll. Looks like it's jumping back and forth between an old and new positions.

Otherwise, the design is really nice. Date pickers are generally pretty "meh".
> a bevy of splinter groups advocating and developing for the rights of certain users.

I'm curious what you mean by this. Free Software has always been about licensing software indiscriminately to all users. I much prefer that than a bunch of ideologically-driven splinter groups fighting for the rights of "certain users".
> The first was Reagan’s famous speech on March 8, 1983 in which he denounced “the aggressive impulses of an evil empire,” declaring the Soviet Union to be “the focus of evil in the modern world.” There was no mincing words; Reagan was calling the Soviet Union the enemy of the United States.

was this just for domestic consumption or messaging to the soviet union?
CR2032 batteries that are in airtags are NOT lithium-ion, they're non-rechargeable and are usually Lithium/Manganese Dioxide [1] (lithium metal). I believe they're fine to have in checked luggage if contained inside some equipment (like the airtag). [2] Look for PI 970
If transported by themselves, they're cargo aircraft only.

Source:
[1] https://data.energizer.com/pdfs/cr2032.pdf
[2] https://www.iata.org/contentassets/05e6d8742b0047259bf3a700b...
Interview I recently with Michael Seibel tried to spin it as if they were looking out for founders, which to me is the opposite of what this does. True founders accept risks and value community.
_________

Interview with YC’s Michael Seibel

- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32988644

Michael Seibel

- https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Seibel
I tried to boot up on my iBook 2003 Mac OS 9 unsuccesfully. It seems once I installed OS X this computer went for this OS forever.
Probably being extra polite at the expense of using the road effectively
Brought them to life first.
Would that do much for multi path bounces etc?
You also have an option to see your website click heatmaps or recordings of user behaviour (Hotjar does a reasonably privacy-respecting effort there), which simply tracks what your users are doing with no extra effort for them.
Yes, adding several hundred drivers all entering/exiting at the same spot in rush hour at specific spots the 405 can do that. Thinking the one on Mulholland Drive right near the 101/405 interchange.
Negative. What would be the point of a draft?
> So we're going to burn all the lithium, instead of building batteries with it?

There are lots of reasons DT fusion is stupid, but this isn't one of them.

If you made a 1kg lithium battery and filled it with DT fusion from one kg of fuel then you'd have to wear the battery out after filling it thousands of times and recycle it 10s of thousands of times.

If you lost 100mg each time you recycled your 1kg battery, you'd run out of battery long before the fuel ran out.

The massive resource consumption of fusion comes from burying the 10000t reactor with 100s of tonnes of materials much more exotic than lithium for 100 years after running 100kg of fuel through it
How about an option for in person account recovery provided by a government official?
I'm sure you won't blame it on the "big bad tech" once you drop your phone in the pool and lose access to your accounts because they never asked you to create an SMS backup
> Just wait until AirTags have accelerometers in them too (capturing all the abuse to bags)!

You can usually film the baggage handlers abusing the luggage going on or off of your plane. It's not a revelation. If you can get a video to go viral, something extremely superficial might be done by the airline, but it's not going to change anything. This has happened many times in the past.
Burnham, Elon, and the Revenge of Entrepreneurial Capitalism
Chromebooks offer some of the best consumer grade security around for PC hardware. Coreboot, firmware tamper detections, Disk encryption, tightened RBAC, kvm virtualization, lxc containerization, seamless a/b partition updating, optionally enable mandatory hardware 2fa keys... All on a simple touchscreen interface even Grandma can use and buy for as low as $100. Meanwhile, a huge number of Linux distributions still promote the use of x11 in their default experience. I'm not saying Google is without recourse, but they work harder than most with their security and it shows pretty clearly to me. Who are you trying to compare them to? Do they not send the formidable Project Zero on their internal projects regularly?
There is no Sanhedrin, the only body that could correct this without a schism. As for making the correction a slight mucking about with the molead rules could do it.
Where to Find Water on Mars