skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Including ≠ selecting by default. Whatever default selection you want to choose, you still need to ship them.
Seventh photo shows tubes that have a 180-degree bend on the end — much like trombone slides. I can't see how this could be from a "fire tube" design.

I wonder if the post-mortem photos that show a more or less colinear bunch of tubes indicate that the front blew off the boiler.
I mean you can do both and we'll probably have to solve general intelligence to have "fully" autonomous driving anyway. If you just want good adaptive cruise control (what most people actually want) then a lot of manufacturers have that. (GM Cruise, Autopilot, OpenPilot, Kia's ACC)
Google didn’t solve really search, it solved an at the time fairly new and related problem of low quality websites. Arguing about the inadequacy of early search engine in that context is like arguing that email clients in 1985 should have included spam filters.
Congrats to the team on this milestone!!
It is miserable. Does it answer the OP's question of how to stop caring?

“not caring” is miserable.
I hate having to pull the 'appeal to authority' card, but after over 20 years in design and architecture, where writing contracts dealing with copyright is very much part of the job, I feel somewhat qualified to pass comment.

The linked definition is exactly what I'm talking about. The framing alone is copied. A lack of foreground/background doesn't mean there is no framing. Also the composition and lighting are copied.

> "The only similarity is that the subject is copied very closely, but that element of the photo doesn't belong to the photographer anyway."

The way the subject is framed, composed and lit belongs to the photographer. It is long established in copyright law, which covers fair use, that the photographer has first copyright on any image they make. If you were to design a new widget and paid a photographer to take promotional images, the image rights belong to the photographer. In much the same way, if you have your portrait taken, whether it was commissioned directly, or by a third party, the image rights belong to the photographer.

Claiming that that the only similarity is "Prince" is not looking at the image. The details, such as the specific curls in the hair to the way the shadow falls on the neck are copied directly from the image. So much so that claiming 'fair use' is a stretch, which could have been so easily avoided had the artist, in this case Andrew Warhola Jr., asked Lynn Goldsmith for permission.

It is clear to anyone that actually looks at the painting that it is entirely derivative of the original photo. If you'll excuse the pun, it's black and white.
> Nice to meet you. Call me Ma'am, I dont care. Call me asshole I dont care, call me anything you want except late for dinner

I don't believe you. What if I called you Pedo?
Yeah, sure. And the consumption tax the article proposes will never be repealed, even when inflation is controlled.
And if Warhol and his fans value the experience, they can pay for the use of the image.
Sure, but my point is this is not a new concept in JS, which is what the parent implied
Are they more destructive than woke activists? I very much doubt that.

Your employer has no business judging you for how you (non-criminally) behave outside your working time. Firing over any such non-criminal behavior should be punishable severely.
I am equally sure you probably support lock-downs, mandatory vaccination, mandatory masking, and all manner of other Draconian actions

Where me and others did not, I did not find these things to be "normal" either.

It all depends on where you place the freedom vs safety metric, I place on the far extreme end of freedom. Which is also why I oppose governments like China in general
> If anyone is free to copy and fully use my work I will not do some
of the work.

Why?

Please read me carefully: I am not accusing you of resentment.

But I already excluded issues of finance and recognition in my
conditions above.

So, other than spitefulness and resentment, what else might possess us
to declare that if "anyone is free to copy and fully use" some work,
then it's not worth doing?

Do you not feel the incredible plenitude and abundance of creativity
that urges you toward generosity?

Is capitalism responsible for somehow poisoning us with the idea that
scarcity is necessary for valuable endeavour?
Is flutter going ok?

It’s a product I’ve shied away from because Google.

Angular (and angularjs before it) are typical Google engineering. (Too much rxjs solutioning in search of a problem to solve. Compare it to svelte using an observable interface to get 80% of the benefit with the rest of the absolute insanity that junior devs bounce off and make angular a dreaded framework compared to react, vue, svelte)

Google is an anti-brand at this point.
Agreed, it was a dumb idea from the get
Alzheimer's-slowing drug labelled historic
It’s worth noting that algorithms can be designed correct under nondeterministic execution. For example, quicksort is correct with a randomly selected pivot. And for associative and commutative functions it doesn’t matter what order they’re executed in the final result is always the same.

Dijkstra’s guarded commands don’t specify an order for the conditional. The semantics is that the process is free to execute any one of the cases that has a true guard. Nevertheless he found them useful for developing and describing many algorithms.
Sounds like the old fallback of swapping in a penny to substitute for a burned out household electrical fuse.
It is missing the Lem editor, that works for CL out of the box but also for more languages (Python, Rust, Go, Java, Dart, Nim, HTML… and a directory, markdown, SQL, shell… mode). https://github.com/lem-project/lem/ It works on the terminal and in an experimental Electron front-end. More are in the works. It lacks docstrings and documentation, but its gitter chat is somewhat active and different people showed interest in helping. It has a Vim layer.

It is an easy to install CL editor and REPL, so it's worth checking out for newcomers, it can help.

https://lispcookbook.github.io/cl-cookbook/editor-support.ht...
One thing I don't understand about the whole codec licensing drama
Ah yes, the always correct "society" should be heavy handed, to counter unnecessary heavy-handed university administration. That is just shifting the tyranny of the majority from an internal to a less qualified external source. Universities' end should be pursuit of the truth, not society's "goals". If society must intervene, it should be to uphold the pursuit of truth, not its own goals. That is a tall task, but lets at least aim in the right direction.

This comment is also a bit odd given the context of the last 5 years of society being ever more overrun by anti-intellectualism, that is diametrically opposed to higher learning.
Huh? The US is not a "special case" in this way.
I think I love you mickael-kerjean.
Sometimes I wonder if that's intentional. You won't suggest the WF-1000XM3, so you recommend "the Sony ones", and your friend goes to their preferred store where the XM3 is unavailable/out of stock and just orders some lower quality/older generation Sony ones rather than a competitor
> I don't find it particularly convincing

Can you elaborate on what you find unconvincing about appeals to open discourse? Are you saying you think censorship is more effective?
qtcreator seems to be ok for me - if your project has a CMakeLists file, just do “sudo apt install qtcreator”, “qtrceater .” Then “F5” and you’re off.

Am I missing out on important functionality?
Only certain supernovas are usable as standard candles, like type 1A.
Well, refusing to go to Escher exhibition or give Mozart a shot is sort of being close-minded…
I don't regret never creating them.
I dont consider it a right, I only recognize negative rights as valid natural rights.

They may have the legal authority to control it, and may have the legal authority to use government guns to prevent unauthorized copying, but they do not have the moral or ethical right.

You must reject natural rights in favor of "who ever have the most guns has the right" method to definition of rights
This makes zero sense because HTML is streamed from Server to Client and interpreted as a byte stream. You want to include blocking content in the first 14KB. The rest doesn‘t matter all that much.
But still, what's more impressive in this performance is her attitude and complete confidence in her body.

There are many people that look good, but tbh I don't see many people that have that full on acceptance of every angle and every curve and so on.
It would probably take all day to heat to steam a boiler that was just a big vessel full of water. So little surface area relative to the volume.
Well, there's the fact that 95% of the hijackers were Saudis.
Useless Meetings Waste Time Money for Big Companies
I have used Clojure on and off for probably 7 years. But when I tried to distribute my program which was a CLI tool, it proved incredibly painful. Clojure startup time is really bad over a second in the best case and it gets worse the more libraries you include. This is not a problem if you are writing a web application, but it's terrible for command line applications. The community seems thoroughly disinterested in solving this problem except with graalvm's native-image. I've done that route and believe me it's so painful.

Common Lisp has everything Clojure has. It feels like Rich Hickie took everything that he liked about Common Lisp and put it into Clojure. Many of the functions in Clojure were basically copied from Common Lisp: if-let, conj(oin), disj(oin) are some examples of core Clojure functions and macros that were totally stolen from Alexandria.

Even better, most CL implementations can save directly to an executable file. Embeddable Common Lisp is my favorite because its executable files are measured in kilobytes, something I could never do with native-image. And the startup time is amazing.

I did look at other lisp languages when deciding to move away from Clojure. However, Racket's standalone executables (raco exe) include the interpreter, and so are huge; Chez Scheme's ecosystem doesn't have a YAML library as far as I can tell, ditto for Chicken. Also scheme's library ecosystem in general (sans racket) is a bit lacking to me.

Common Lisp it is. It has its warts, but they're not too bad. It's long history also speaks of stability though. SBCL is crazy good optimized.
In other words, "I'm a pusher but I won't let my children use narcotics."
Pizarro (one z, two r's) AFAIK:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francisco_Pizarro

or is it an alternate spelling used in English?

Pizzaro sounds (to an Italian) like an invented word about someone that deals with pizza's.
Treatments like exercise also have high variance - depending on the circumstance and how diligently you implement it, it may have no effect, a big effect, or even cause injury in the worst case.

Insurance likes low variance outcomes because they’re easier to model accurately
No one hires for devops security. In the largest of FAANG orgs there will be 50-100 regular devops, app sec, and security engineering roles for every devsecops role. There is an expectation that security be integrated into these other roles, so someone looking to get hired would be better served to find the roles that companies are actually trying to fill and then spin their security chops so that they look like a unicorn in a field of horses and even a few zebras.
This is me every time I have to work with react, and that's with toy projects in my web development course. Can't imagine how hellish it is to work with a mature, half a decade old big React code base.
Interesting, it's almost like one could call this a "randomized algorithm" (which we know can be faster than deterministic algorithms) but the non-determinism comes from the input data and code execution rather than a RNG.
> and things like the server-assisted initial key exchange are both bolted-on and often omitted from security analysis in a way that I find very dubious.

You mean the Extended Triple Diffie-Hellman? What do you mean by "bolted-on"? Would you consider it "bolted-on" too, if it was just a normal Diffie-Hellman (hence not asynchronous)?
Exactly this. I've been through what OP described. I eventually resigned this January after a 8 year long abusive career, and decided to freelance with my friend who had already been doing this for years.

Changing your perspective and worrying about yourself as a business is the best thing to do.
Surprisingly more normal than people realize. Most don’t ever air their dirty laundry like this.

You go through this as a man and it reinforces your suppression of feelings and desires to never open up to anyone because of the humiliation.

No wonder men kill themselves 4x as often as women.
> At this point 99.99% of people are not leaving their network unsecured…

99.99% of people are doing what? Sorry, the double negative above is confusing me.
See also https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33052307
So using LSD in a title makes it clickbaity? Come on, that’s ridiculous. Don’t squeeze the life from that term by applying it to anything you don’t like.
What a naive article.

Can't believe it made to hn top.
This doesn’t pass the smell test for an in vivo result. If they spiked insulin in a physiological meaningful way without actual glucose you’d expect hypoglycemia. It’s not like insulin resistance is an acute process.
If web developers had freedom, there would be minimal amount of tracking, fingerprinting or anti-patterns. If you want to assign blame, you have to look higher in the food chain
> I'm not seeing the immediate value here.

The parent comment might have been coming at it from the angle of having a firewall in front of your web app is helpful because it blocks a whole bunch of bad actor traffic from ever touching your app's servers.

Of which I would agree with too. A decently popular site could end up having at least 10% of its traffic being malicious. Let your app servers worry about the legit traffic and filter the rest beforehand.
This is just an opinionated rant masquerading as news.

particularly revealing is this line

>resistance to its privatisation and the importation of America's grisly omnishambolic health care "system."

I think anyone who knows about the current state of the NHS is under no illusions that it's in any way fit for use. I think a lot of people wouldn't mid an American-style system if it gives them access to healthcare. (edit: i'm overstating slightly. My point is that the NHS is crying out for some services to be outsourced to private companies, even if they happen to be American)
> Another benefit of this approach is that it would be very easy to turn it off, and generate static code (like Java would) for production.

Note that there's already zero peak overhead to a switch point for an invoke dynamic call site, so 'turning it off' wouldn't make any difference to the machine code or speed of the program.
Norvig's Law (2002)
That would be slightly different than mis-gerndering me, or calling me by the wrong name, or using a premarital name wouldnt it?

That would be accusing me of crime, and accusing me of victimization of others. These are actions that one would have to take.

That is a far different statement than simply calling someone the wrong name, pronoun, etc.

One could be arrested, jailed, fired, etc for being a "pedo", Referring to a "they" as "she" or "he" would not result in that person being arrested, jailed or fired. if anything today the person using the incorrect pronoun would have higher legal jeopardy than the person being "mis-gendered"

Calling someone Ma'am if they wanted Sir or vice versa is not going to result in the person the incorrect salutation was directed at being fired or jailed

Your "gotcha" is both insane and idiotic, raising to the level is disbelief anyone would even make that as a analog comparison
I think they are suggesting that years of abuse hurled at the average user, coupled with legislation, have caused all new home networks to be secure, one way or the other.
i like this sort of informed critical response. good to see!
Scientists are excited about a new hotdog-like food that prevents depression without the meat: cake!
I think it's definitely a bit of both, which is why he's a fantastic marketer for his products. At this point it's basically defined who he is.
> I think anyone who knows about the current state of the NHS is under no illusions that it's in any way fit for use. I think a lot of people wouldn't mid an American-style system if it gives them access to healthcare.

Anecdata: nah. At least of my friends in the UK, they're fine with the waits if it means they don't have to pay our ludicrous health insurance premiums, deductibles, and other costs.

A case comes to mind where a friend flew back to London for an appointment 2 months in the future in order to avoid paying tens of thousands in costs in the US. Those who know both systems (from my experience at least) overwhelmingly pick the NHS.
How exactly do you think that suggests the first iPhone wasn’t innovative?
This seems to be about a specific type of games, mobile games with microtransactions. Banning all video games outright is strange as it means they are unable to differentiate or are simply unaware that different types exist. It's like banning all movie watching in a household because porn movies exist.

The solutions suggested are decent but only a stopgap; they kind of miss a root solution, which is to get the duopoly to crack down on harmful/addictive games. But the duopoly will not do so, and will instead point at their half-arsed solutions, once again putting the onus of control on a section of the population without control.

So the only way becomes through legislation. What the author along with the parents should be doing is pushing for legislation that forces tech companies to put controls in place and punish game companies if they transgress certain boundaries.
The color coded rings on resistors is a mightily bad idea, at least as implemented on resistors.

I'm not that colorblind, I see traffic lights, fruits between leaves and other things others have problems with, basically everything except resistor rings and distant lighthouse colors (yes, the colors on a map make sense, but trying to decode them IRL is as hard as resistor codes.)
What to read to understand “effective altruism”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head-twitch_response
There is no obligation to collaborate either. I can write a software, publish it and insult people who wrongly report bugs.

Of course I wouldn't expect people to love me for that, and it's not how I personally act; but if someone felt like acting in this way, it would be fully within his/her rights to do so.
Among the Europeans I know, the NHS is considered a laughing stock, and they find it absurd how much national pride there is for it. A move towards a European system like Germany’s would likely have significant positive outcomes. In the UK, you can barely see a GP in a week; in Germany you can see a specialist in days. There’s a spending disparity but it’s not big enough to explain the difference in outcomes IMO.

Unfortunately this country is completely unwilling to have any kind of discussion about NHS reform.
Modern feminism has definitely been taken over by PMCs to disenfranchise workers from uniting. You’d have to be blind to not notice the “if you critique anything we say/make/do then you are the enemy!” type of division being spread throughout modern feminism and most identity politics. It’s also used as a nice defense against any critiques in general. “Our movie doesn’t suck - it’s because you’re racist and sexist that you didn’t like it!” Why do you think the government back in the 60s started really narrowing in on MLK when he started talking about class? You think that was a coincidence…?

Also the quotas thing is def real. Idk where you work (I work in SV) but I’ve seen them and I’ve seen how they affect men directly.
Every generation keeps trying rpc and learns its lesson…eventually.

On windows it was DCom, then COM+ then remoting the WCF then who knows I lost track.

Rest APIs are simple and easily debuggable, magic remote api layers are not.

That’s why REST is still prevalent even in websockets had better better performance parameters (and in my testing it did have performance advantages) yet 7 years after my testing hire many sites are running websockets?
Nice to see more flipCode people around :) So much great information back in those days!
"I feel like some of these perspectives are very tech industry focused rather than gamer focused."

They are - Google is still the most trusted brand in any studies you can find (and if you find one where it's not, it's probably #2)

It is going down rather than climbing right now, but that's also not that uncommon - Apple/etc is also seeing the same thing.

Now, among tech, and maybe even gamers, i would bet this is less true, and that is highly problematic to the degree it needs to sell to tech/people who listen to tech.

But the latter also often consistently overestimates how much influence it has (IE tech people often believe that the whisper effect they have makes a difference, and that is only true in certain cases over a long period of time).

In most cases, social influencers in completely unrelated fields can generate more tech product sales than happy/angry tech people :)

Put another way - the simplistic notion that Stadia, or anything from Google, failed simply due to lack of tech trust is silly. While it's a fun headline that plays to their audience, things are rarely that simple
Okay, thanks for your answer!
So you're using pagerduty and defined your own incident process with priorities and roles. Interesting.
When a crisis arises during the day, the whole team is meeting in a war room and focus on fixing it or only the on-duty people work on it?
The argument in this piece is a classic example of slippery slope-ism. The question of fair use, or of balancing between copyright maximalism and copyright minimalism, is a so-called line-drawing problem (given a spectrum of cases, deciding where the line of “ok” vs “not ok” should be). The article says that ANY decision in favor of the photographer/against Warhol would basically ruin fair use doctrine.

This proposition has barely a hint of truth in it. Especially considering how clever lawyers, SCOTUS justices included, can be in distinguishing one case from the next.

I’d hardly be worried.
With RPC/Telefunc, this is what you do instead:

get_tasks({completed:false})
add_task({id, …})
update_task({id, completed})
upsert_task({id, …})
delete_task(id)

Or a meaningful subset of it, also set in stone when appropriate.

There is no reason to start being unreasonable with your APIs once you switch underlying protocols. And no protocol will stop you from doing

POST /sqls <some sql>

Also, pedantically, your POSTs are wrong. You have to PUT (or likely PATCH in this case) into /task/:id, or POST into /tasks.

https://restfulapi.net/rest-put-vs-post/
Tip: overcuring (too salty or too dry) can be reversed just by soaking in fresh water! Often just five minutes is enough.

It's saved my butt more than once.
I'm a big fan of alternative voting methods. But I'm always a bit frustrated that ranked choice (or really it's IRV) is always the go-to. I'd much prefer a score based method like STAR voting. It's more expressive, scores carry more information than a ranking. It does a much better job at eliminating strategic voting. And it's still dead simple at the voting booth
This is unfair.

USB mostly has predictably "just worked" as in "there is a port for it and it works when I plug it in".
Quantum Random Bit Generator Service
Optimus Prime Auto-Converting Robot