skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I wasn't there, but IIRC it was a 5th gen fighter against Maverick and Rooster in an F-14 that pulled this off. Unfortunately for the 5th gen pilot it later came down to the pilot, not the plane, and he became splash 2.
That’s a trademark and not a copyright issue.

You should instead be selling Grateful Dead t-shirts as they have never enforced their trademark!
You’re probably right now that I’ve read up on it, I wasn’t previously aware of catch_unwind.
If this is legit (and I don't really doubt that it is other than it's so rare to hear someone complain about Tesla while simultaneously owning a Tesla), then I'd love to hear more about this.

You say the car has minor fit and finish issues, but that's clearly not what would motivate you to get rid of it. CarPlay / AA is fixable I imagine.

Is there anything else that's gone wrong with your experience?

I say this as someone who has eyeballed the Model 3 but never committed, and I'd be interested to hear about any negatives (as the internet hype mafia makes it difficult to see these stories).
I use Joplin and pay for the basic plan ~$2 a month.

Pros

— You don't have to pay anything. You can sync to your system and still have encrypted notes.

— Can switch between Markdown and rich text

— Web Clipper is fantastic for storing full website copies as reference material

— Can sync between mobile, desktop, etc

— Works with various OS's

Cons

— Printing crashes the desktop app on PopOS!. I have not reported this as it does not affect me that often.

—— The print crash does not affect OSX

— The mobile app can be a bit slow to start on older iPhones (several years old)

Overall, I view Joplin as similar to Apple notes, with a bit more control, ease of export, and benefits of Markdown.

My use case is journaling, work, and the first cut of writing that I publish.
How long do you think platforms are going to allow users to change their DNS settings for?
They're debuggable, with effort. Here's the finance neuron in CLIP:
https://microscope.openai.com/models/contrastive_4x/image_bl...
A nit:
If we're saying memory size is 64GB, that's in HEDT and workstation territory, so let's look at memory bandwidth of, e.g., M1 Max or Ultra at 400-800GB/s (so factor of 400,000-800,000).

"Whereas M1 Max had 16 LPDDR5-6400 channels for a total of 408GB/second of memory bandwidth, M1 Ultra doubles that to 32 LPDDR5 channels and 800GB/second of memory bandwidth." [1]

Realistically, there were plenty of higher end systems in the early 80s with more than 64K of RAM as well, so maybe more fair to compare to the specs of, an Apple IIe to a M1 Ultra Mac Studio as a sort of common denominator (similarly priced, given inflation). Problem then is that systems in the early 80s didn't include a hard drive, so you're looking at a $3,500 add-on (in 2022 dollars) just to get to parity in terms of computer features we now consider basic requirements. With that extra $3,500 we're in territory looking something more like this:

Memory size: 64K 128GB factor of 2,000,000
Memory bandwidth: 1MB/sec 800GB/sec factor of 800,000
Instructions/sec: 500,000 10 billion/core 20,000 per core
Disk size: 5M 8TB factor of 1,600,000
Magnetic disk speed: 150K/sec 500MB/sec factor of just 3,300 [2]
Actual drives compared: 150K/sec 7.5GB/sec factor of 50,000

1: https://www.anandtech.com/show/17306/apple-announces-m1-ultra-combining-two-m1-maxes-for-even-more-performance
2: https://www.storagereview.com/news/seagate-exos-2x14-hdd-delivers-524mb-s
Not sure, but if we just cede at every point there will never be one

That is why an open source popular Linux distro like Debian was important, to put pressure on manufacturers

Big company need not worry, Debian will now test, maintain and support your closed firmware, making it easy for everyone to use, but working for them for free

And especially because recycling is hard for all hardware should be as open and interoperable as possible for us to avoid keep throwing working computer parts in the trash
Interesting. Is it limited to Twitter? I can see the company fearing a backlash in social medias where you're operating under your own name (and thus can be traced back to Google) but what about anonymous and semi-anonymous forums like HN?
In Germany we just stopped incentiving them because people just didn't charge them.

They just didn't care.
I thought they be doing something interesting to match video background with background color of element it is displayed on, but alas, each video has appropriate background baked in.
The ideas within a comment that is stated in a sarcastic form on the other hand, still possess the same value as they would have if stated in a different form. A sarcastic form may render the value invisible from certain frames of reference, but it is still there.
After 20+ years in the field: main reason is unclear requirements. Software malleability is taken for granted so much that the under specification and fluidity of requirements became a norm and canonicalized in “agile”. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, it does allow for quick advancement of what is possible but high failure rate is the price we pay. Second: unlike traditional engineering, there are not too many university or college programs that take rigorous approach to building software at scale. Till today, software is a free-for-all industry. That allowed us to grow very fast, but - again - high failure rate is the price we pay. Third - lack of formal standards and by that I mean not just APIs or protocol specs but formal requirements on things like performance, fault-tolerance, lifespan etc.
Why would you use MD5 in anything written in the last 5 years? The SHA family is faster on modern hardware and there aren't trivial collisions floating around out there.
There's this narrative going around that antidepressants bad because medication bad, psychiatric industry evil, modern medicine bad, yadda yadda yadda.

The problem is, everybody's brain chemistry is unique and different, because our genetics are different. Some antidepressants work for some people and not others. I've personally tried 5 of them. Only one of them worked on me, and it had some unfortunate side-effects (messed with my sleep). My ex-girlfriend used a different antidepressant (Zoloft). Personally, I've tried Zoloft and all it did was make me sleepy all the time, but I've found Lexapro was quite effective and useful for getting my life back on track.

The way efficacy studies are done right now is, we measure the average effect on a group of people. That's doesn't really make sense when you think that everyone's genetics are unique and the antidepressant could be making some people better and some people worse, right? Maybe half the group feels better, but a quarter of the group becomes suicidal. Then on average, you see scores going up, you see the drug is beneficial on average... It would be kind of like giving everyone in a group a prescription for eyeglasses, all with the same prescription, and measuring that on average, participants can read better with the eyeglasses than not.

In some ways, modern medicine is still very primitive. Flooding the whole brain with a chemical and hoping that it interacts with the right receptors and has a beneficial effect without too many side effects if you have the right genetics is very primitive. It's the best we have right now though, and antidepressants in general are probably more helpful than not, but yes, people SHOULD be aware that they might very well not work on them.
The article elaborates some of the reasons which made them "terrible places to live" - which I'll summarize as "bad rule by distant landlords"

I find it odd that you excluded Hawaii and Alaska.
> Aggression is not criminal

The crime of aggression (aka crime against peace) is, like war crimes and crimes against humanity, a widely recognized crime, prosecuted in the various peri-/post-WWII tribunals, though it took a while for the ICC to settle on its operationalization.

> There are times when the US has had soldiers commit war crimes, and it’s debatable how effective the US has been at prosecuting such things historically, but it does make a realistic attempt to do so.

The standard for ICC jurisdiction isn’t general adequacy, it is specific good faith action in the particular case.
Okay, thank you for the info.
Very true. After all it was Upton Sinclair who said: "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it."
It'd be nice to see historical trends too, in Canada banks will often raise their rates for ~3 months as a "promotion" before lowering them back down, which requires a lot of micromanagement
I am a religious person who happens to have enjoyed LSD in my time. I have had the most profound experiences during my many trips, and not a single one that was at all like the sense of awe I get from worship.

I love the headspace that you get into during the trip. It is great for finally addressing issues that you have set aside. After the trip however, you think that all your ideas are good, then it wears off, so either way it is not useful just by itself.
How is this different from Kata containers or the other microvm-based Docker frameworks?
I'm curious, what's the problem with git-annex?

I've considered using it before as an alternative to Git LFS.
Tesla delivered a record 343,830 vehicles during the third quarter of 2022
South Korea Censorship Landing Page
To be fair, suburb streets aren’t that car unfriendly. Many of the subdevelopments I’ve been to are extremely chill, low traffic, low speed.

The problem is really twofold:

- suburbs are far away from anything worth biking to. Strip malls and chain stores aren’t great destinations. The nice stuff (or bike friendly stuff) is closer to the city and many miles away from the subdevelopments.

- Those connection stroads are dangerous to walk and bike on. On the flip side, the public right of way used to built them is so large, it’d be “easy” to add bike lanes and sidewalks. By easy, I mean it won’t make people’s lives worse. You could remove a lane or a handful of parking spots and it wouldn’t make a huge impact to human life.

But at the end of the day… if there’s nowhere to go, no one would use those modified roads.

So it’s a catch 22, and I doubt it will get better with small local initiatives because the suburb lifestyle is so ingrained in many people’s lives.
I personally went to Fedora. I'm not a fan of Manjaros very fast package testing, there's apparently issues there. I'd stay with mainline arch.

That said. My point wasn't that Arch is hard or something. But that Arch could do some small things to make it much easier to have wider adoption... Its an example. There's things that other distros could do to solve this too.

The amount of "you use Ubuntu? That's a babys distro, I use Gentoo because I'm smarter!"

That shit needs to go.
Bought Amelie a few years ago and it’s still playable in my Vudu library. Wonder if that was just a Canada thing.
It also lines up with people getting similar benefits from serious meditation practice or dramatic life experiences.

The common theme is that all these things change perspective, and none of them are entirely safe.
And the actual accessibility is not that great https://accessibilitytest.org/results/HEU-NOIXMBVk
Since I love art, I want dedicated professionals devoting their lives to making it.

They produce so much better art than even equally talented people doing it in their spare time.
People said this about cameras. About digital cameras. About digital photo editing software. The next generation will normalize these tools and find incredible ways to be creative within their new cutting edge medium.

The post-art world is here! Just think about how history books will remember this period! The styles that will be borne of necessity, of the need to break down art and find what makes it tick.
I feel like you didn't read my comment. It contained:

> Favoring research of understudied populations makes a lot of sense and is necessary.

Which is in direct agreement with what you wrote in response.

> Favoring researchers based on their own personal diversity metrics is controversial.

But it also acknowledges there are aspects others may find controversial. The policy extends beyond sample selection and populations addressed in research, and e.g. favors researchers from diverse backgrounds. Personally, I think this is useful (more perspectives good; more inclusion in science good)-- within reason.

> Favoring research whose findings support specific diversity-related desired outcomes is dangerous (and the policy may do this in practice).

And it points out that if interpretation of the policy extends too far, that by only allowing certain types of outcome to publish, it could create distortions. The worry is that the latter criteria in the policy could reach here.
>health insurance doesn't cover gym memberships or exercise equipment

Because neither of those things are necessary to exercise.

I bet if you asked your GP for some body weight exercises you could do at home he'd happily provide some for you and insurance would cover the visit.
By that same premise SpaceX should never show off any imagery about where they're planning to go (Mars), or what rockets they're planning to build. You've no doubt seen the past renderings of what they plotted Starship to look like, and that projection changed repeatedly across many years.

It's quite obvious why Tesla put that image at the top: the building and deployment of the truck is aspirational for the company. There is nothing wrong with that. All other automakers, without exception, do the same thing in regards to aspirational future products, and they do not get mocked for it nearly as much as Tesla does.

A truck they don't yet make is not the same notion as a truck they will never make.
You wouldn't report someone for accepting bribes, falsifying paperwork or sexually harassing someone just because they are your friend?
Those thriving are stealing from those struggling to survive? Or has the pie grown larger?
That’s an odd thing to claim. I have worked on certified medical devices that run custom Linux distribution.

Mind you, that experience also severely soured me on the quality of medical software systems, due to poor quality of the software that ran in that distribution. Linux itself was a golden god in comparison to the crap that was layered on top of it.
The Prius Prime (PHEV) maxes out at 25 miles of electric range. And that is under optimal conditions. The average daily commute is longer than that.
Common POP I implementations let me leave things on the server indefinitely, for a chosen period, or to delete immediately on retrieval, leaving the local copy intact. Can you think of any IMAP implementations that allow that?
Try it once, then evaluate ;-)
>innate qualities measured by IQ

is contested/wrong
Yup, we've had a Prius C for nearly 10 years, it's been faultless and has consistently used less than half the gas of the other family car. That's a real world difference, not a hypothetical future one.
Credit Suisse CEO Seeks to Calm as Default Swaps Near 2009 Level
No, but I'm sure you're aware that publishers/developers can make versions that run on each platform and license them in more consumer-friendly ways. I've bought non-SaaS desktop apps that come with license codes for each platform. If not included, there's often a discount for buying licenses for multiple platforms. And this doesn't require me to create an account for phone-home license validation. That type of license bundling is not so easy* and definitely less common with walled gardens.

* - I am taking developers at their word on this. I haven't sold anything on the Mac App Store.
Don't quote me on the specific hash algorithm, maybe it's SHA. Point is that it's just comparing modification times and hashes.
The frontend is in Vue. Both the FE and BE are in TypeScript.

Parallelism is provided by https://github.com/photostructure/batch-cluster.js/

Metadata reads and writes are via https://github.com/photostructure/exiftool-vendored.js/

Persistence is via SQLite: https://github.com/WiseLibs/better-sqlite3

Image transforms are via Sharp: https://sharp.pixelplumbing.com/

My more nerdier blog posts are tagged here: https://photostructure.com/tags/coding/
Lisp is cute
I love the syntax, the REPL-driven development to which not many languages can come close (Smalltalk I think has something similar?)
Yep, I see this as a start, and very curious to see the ways in which it’ll get used with a human in the loop, and also the ways human artists will be pushed to creat art that’s out of distribution for these models.
Hey, yes, we've decided to keep it opt-out for now and it collects fully anonymized basic statistics. Here is the full policy: https://dvc.org/doc/user-guide/analytics .

It should be easy to opt-out though `dvc config core.analytics false` or an env variable `DVC_ANALYTICS=False`.

Could you please clarify about the `several lines of code`? We were trying to make it very open and visible what we collect (it prints a large message when it starts) + make it easy to disable it.
>It appears your plan is to sacrifice Ukraine to Russia in hopes he doesn't do it again

This does not represent engaging intelligently with my argument.

Let's cut the crap. Is it your opinion that we should ensure Russia loses in Ukraine, up to and including a direct nuclear exchange?
Glad to be of service. Note that the idiomatic error handling in rust is still Result based rather than panic/catch_unwind based.

Nevertheless a long living application like, e.g., a webserver will catch panics coming from its subtasks (e.g., its request handlers) via catch_unwind
Lisp was my favorite prototype language… I could write programs 10x faster in Lisp. Lisp also made me a better programmer and taught me the superiority of functional programming.
Making the codegen language model drop a column in a dataframe
That is a 2023 vehicle AIUI.
Why is this so upvoted? There's nothing interesting here, it's just some guy saying he likes using Lisp.
Yeah, people talk about sauna in a health context (vaguely) but I almost never hear from them what the health benefits are supposed to be. I might be motivated to do it if there are benefits to it, but right now it feels like a bit of a chore.
If I was in charge I’d be tempted to only make model Y. It would pick up all the demand and it’s probably the cheapest to make. And you’d save money not running four different production lines.
They're a lot better than when the model 3 first came out.

There are still some fit and finish issues in body panels though, the standard is not up to any other manufacturer there.
Tesla specifically came to them and asked them to developed a machine to their specifications, financed and developed the product and they are getting virtually all the machines the company can produce.

Also its a part of company from China operating in Italy.

These machines are also continuously improved in prosecution at Tesla and that knowlage is flowing back to the company. The machines deployed in Texas are already an improvement over those in California. There is a lot around the core machine that needs to be improved as well.
Yeah yeah, Cat 5 with 8P8C connectors. The shift in terminology is not the point, the shift in terminology is the evidence of wifi's ubiquity.
I built a super cheap "traditional" dry sauna. It's basically an electric burner, a pot to increase surface area and humidity, a 25 foot roll of thermal foil, and a sleeping bag as the ceiling. I disassembled the burner, removed all the plastic pieces, and short circuited the safety cutoff. It's jank AF, but in the end less than 100$. AFAIK there aren't any dry saunas under $1000 - the heater alone is ~$200. Mine is also portable, so it's in the garage in summer and in the laundry room in winter. There are portable infrared saunas for ~$100, but most studies are on the "dry" type. I rubber band a block of ice to my phone and do my reading/social media in there, so the time cost is reduced. It's pitch black in there, so I have a very bright night light. No problems with air circulation - it doesn't get stuffy, even when I throw a dash of water in the pot.

https://i.imgur.com/Lml7Vms.jpg

2 years in and I haven't burned down the house... yet. I've since added more ceramic around the pot so burning myself would be very difficult.

(Reference to my post from the last time this article was posted on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28495062 )
Cold shower is great, immersing yourself fully in cold water is like one notch more intense as body has no parts that are still hot anywhere. I basically see all my veins when I get out of the cold water, like after an intense 2h bike ride.
It makes more sense to see the OCEAN traits as a general strategy mix for a human being. Each trait will express differently depending on the context, and the traits will intermix with each other. Which is why it makes more sense to consider the individual as a whole instead of a trait in isolation and with regards to specific situations.

Openness to experience means that the person in question will engage more often in idea-related activities. They'll be more likely to consider unusual ideas and courses of action as a result, and the unusuality of it will be relative to their environment. It's a strategy of higher activity and higher risk.
For memory, check out:

1) Retro, which is essentially attention over large databases, and fast as hell.

2) S4 Layers, explicitly designed for handling long dependencies.

These are orthogonal approaches to memory, and both very effective at what they do.
ideally they would include them and account for them in the analysis, as exclusion presents a confounding variable.
Purelymail: Cheap, No-Nonsense Email
IQ is a deeply questionable metric to start with (I have yet to see good evidence IQ tests measure anything more than "how good at IQ tests you are", and as a child I obsessed over them and got very good at them by learning how to approach them, which means it very much isn't measuring something innate), tests are often (and in the case of the historic ones actually cited in the "evidence", all) culturally biased, and the supposed evidence for IQ differences is deeply flawed. (The famous example of "The Bell Curve" citing absurd things like tests in English referencing British culture being given to people who didn't even speak English properly and had never been to Britain as accurate IQ tests).

> It's clearly because of some more innate qualities measured by IQ.

This is an absurd statement, because even if the IQ differences exist, you are jumping to a conclusion here: that difference in IQ is innate, and not a result of racism or other external factors, with your only justification being:

> And the differences appear before school age, so it's hardly any opportunity for racism to cause it.

One of the biggest factors for childhood success is how much time your parents spend with you when you are young. If historic racism means your family is poorer, it likely means your parents can spend less time with you. Just one example of many of how this argument just doesn't hold water.
With Linux you can unload and reload modules (rmmod, insmod) so it’s a little un-monolithic in that sense.
>Google invented something unique and innovative and they were rewarded tremendously for it. There were literally hundreds of other companies trying to do the same thing but Google was better. If it was low hanging fruit then Hotbot or any of the other major players could’ve done it.

I actually think that their entrepreneur spirit and business attitude made them successful. Other guys thought of their search engines as of technical experiments and hobbies, they weren't serious about it. In another words Google cared more for innovating their search engine, making money and then reinvesting it back in R&D and staying ahead of everybody. The same story was with Microsoft and Digital Research; Bill Gates simply cared more business wise and was more fanatical in making money than Gary Kildall.
Tangentially related to article, what happened to the riscv beagle board, is that still going to be available for purchase?