skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
My Model 3 is over four years old, still running great, zero maintenance. (I have a lift and rotate the tires myself, so actually zero maintenance money out of pocket cost other than replacing the tires.) Tesla replaced the backup camera for free - they came to me to perform the warranty repair.

My Model Y is two years old, no problems.

Combined mileage between the two vehicles is just shy of 150K.

The fit and finish of my older Model 3 has always just felt a bit better than the Y. I had to fix a weird creaking emanating from the rear hatch of the Y - a loose panel.

My Model 3 is the vehicle I have owned for the longest time and used continually. I haven't even had a desire to look for a new vehicle, which is way outside of my usual car purchasing behavior. (I have owned - and spent way, way too many hours myself on maintenance and repairing ICE vehicles.)
They issued one recall already, so I assumed at least some are in customers' hands?
No offense taken. My comment wasn't meant to complain about it, just that it never clicked for me. I admit that I haven't tried hard or long enough but I've made peace with the fact that I have only so many hours/brain cells/etc and it's ok to not master all the things I think I should.
Extrapolating further, staying in the sauna indefinitely will age you down.
> But they should be faulted so they can correct the fault and do better next time.

I don't understand the point you're trying to make. They're clearly trying to do better as this is a fairly novel approach. Is it perfect? No. But I'm puzzled by the weirdly negative and aggressive reaction this is getting.

Deaf people are often neglected and forgotten about. My partner's father is deaf and when he visits government services, had medical appointments, etc., they almost never provide an interpreter — despite it being a legal requirement he requests in advance which is fully subsidized — because they assume that writing stuff down on paper or making vague gestures is adequate. If awareness and accessibility for deaf people is this bad in a major Canadian metropolitan area, imagine how bad it is in smaller areas and countries.
America is a declining empire, and it appears to be a law of history that declining empires establish increasingly cumbersome regimes of copyright regulation.

So I must assume that the side wanting to restrict fair use further will win.
Depends 100% on what you're going to get out of it/them.
Interesting the IBMK ROMP https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_ROMP
Was a spin-off from the 801 project and was the CPU used in the IBM RT range and saw the birth of AIX.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENa98h7M7qY

https://la.disneyresearch.com/stuntronics/

Okay, lets compare this bot to Disney's bot. From 4 years ago, which is used to make movies and/or Disney Theme Park attractions.
have you ever tried typed racket?
Have you ever told them this in response to being told it’s ok to cry? Have you interrogated your assumption or are you operating on inferences without sufficient evidence?

“Women” aren’t some sort of psychosexual Kobayashi Maru where every choice is just a different wait to fail. They might surprise you if you’re willing to engage with them on the topic of how society is engineered to oppress those with feelings and compassion, like women, in places like the workplace, etc…
> One theatrical company doing a production of Macbeth does not stop another.

Human leisure, desire and opportunity to consume artistic works is a fair of the population size, and is not unlimited.

That's why you don't see a unique and profitable theatre company present on YouTube for every individual of the population.
Yeah, should probably give up on copyrighting sequences of notes. Copyright the arrangements instead. An awful lot of what makes a song good is the arrangement.
>Well, yes, anything where Russia perceives that using a nuke would be a viable option is a failure of regional–at least–security, which is why there has been substantial effort to make it very clear that that option is not viable for them, both through messaging, deployment of forces, etc.

Yes, that is the intent. The problem is one of ensuring the message results in our desired belief-state in Putin. In reality, all we can do is be clear regarding our responses to various scenarios, and Putin will decide how he evaluates the cost of the west's responses. Putin may not evaluate the cost landscape in the manner we hope. Thus our actions may only precipitate further escalations from both sides.

>is why there must in that case be a substantial (though not necessarily nuclear, in response to a tactical nuke) response from NATO.

Why think this action itself does not start us on the road that inevitably leads to a nuclear exchange?

>Beyond that, Russia reaching the point that there only viable option is to retreat and abandon their aggression is not only a success scenario, it is the only success scenario. Everything else is some degree of failure.

This just goes to the point I made upthread, whether the U.S. can come to accept a world order not entirely driven by U.S. interests without fighting a world war over it. The era of universal success for the U.S. on the world stage is over.
Layoffs at big corps are not 100% based on performance. Clearly there are exceptions, some of which you mentioned, and many talented people will be caught in the net.

However, the typical way layoffs happen is that managers are ordered to submit the names of their most dispensable reports, and typically these are the lower performers.

Of course, some of these will be high performers that the manager personally dislikes, and some of those spared will be low performers who just happen to be indispensable due to various irrelevant factors, such as specialized knowledge, or great politicians.

My point was more that if you're smugly waiting for the best and brightest to lose their jobs at BigN and come to work for you for the same bad pay and terms they rejected last year, you're going to be disappointed. The layoffs are going to be limited, and mostly affect lower performers, while any high-performer laid off is going to get multiple competitive offers and remain quite picky.
> “Safety” isn’t a well-defined term for PL in general. “Soundness” is.

This is false. "Safety" and "Liveness" are terms used by the PL field to describe precise properties of programs and they have been used this way for like 50 years (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safety_and_liveness_properties). A "safety" property describes a guarantee that a program will never reach some form of unwanted state. A "liveness" property describes a guarantee that a program will eventually reach some form of wanted state. These terms would be described very early in a PL course.
> That shit needs to go.

120% agreed. Much like you I want distros to be a bit more ergonomic and easy to start with, and that's why I chose an Arch derivative because I wanted Arch plus some convenience on top.

RE: short / shallow testing, that's likely true but I interpreted it as: "we will monitor if a breaking bug is posted somewhere and if that doesn't happen in 2-4 weeks then we deem the package good enough".

While many might find that not professional, I don't care as much. I need a fast-moving distro for my dev machines. I can't afford to be several versions behind on a number of packages.

For my servers it's still 50/50 because kernel updates have legitimately improved the performance of one of them and I really wouldn't want to wait for that update for some 2-3 years like Debian does. But then again I'm not protected against sudden breakage either so maybe there's a distro out there that sits in between the two extremes.

Perhaps Fefora?
Related:

Norvig's Law - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7491767 - March 2014 (13 comments)

Norvig's Law - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=317170 - Sept 2008 (14 comments)

Norvig's Law: Any technology that surpasses 50% penetration will never double again - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36047 - July 2007 (4 comments)
After his embarrassing failures in the SPAC space over the past few years, Chamath should be a pariah.
I think eye tracking and facial cameras inside the goggles are key, but not as input. We will never be able to render a realistic avatar if it’s not picking up facial movements and eye focus. With a photo of the face and the ability to track muscle movements in the face around the eyes you can reproduce a realistic personal face with expressed expressions reflected in VR. As an input it feels like a limited utility thing - perhaps bring up information on the object focused on, but mental intent and eye focus are often not in line with each other - I might intend to do something with X but am monitoring Y and Z in the environment with my eyes while keeping X in partial focus.
>CCS won in Europe because the EU mandated it. Tesla won in the US because they have majority of marketshare and built out a nationwide fast DC charging network on their own [1].

Does it really matter? Tesla offers both standards on their superchargers in Europe, and I'm sure (in their newer car designs) the digital and electronic components are ready to support both standards. I agree it's annoying to have two different plugs, but at this point isn't it basically a cheap retrofit? (At least for new-model Teslas and superchargers... I do worry that older Teslas might get left behind.)
We have Henry Kissinger to thank for that. Disgusting what we (America) did there.
Ok, we'll put 2002 above. Thanks!
Do images of soup cans or thoughts of fifteen minutes of fame come to mind when you’re viewing the Goldsmith photo?

Both Warhol’s works and Vanity Fair can be seen as celebrations of, well, celebrity vanity.

What I’m getting at is that it seems Vanity Fair chose the Warhol for the cover because it means something very different than the original photograph and that Warhol’s baggage could easily be what the editors needed for the intended effect.
That 63ms packet was one packet. It's way out of the standard deviation. You don't point to the max and state that's the typical experience of the network.

If we only looked at max values then Amazon isn't 2 day shipping it's like 1 month because some delivery sometime took that long, even though like 95% of deliveries are within two days (just an example, don't know what their actual rates are)

And on top of that, that's with an extremely cheap chip with a compromised antenna inside a network closet with a TCXO literally right on top of the antenna running on 2.4FHz. My 5GHz example with a nice AX chip and decent laptop lid edge antenna never experienced any pings higher than 1ms.
Sure it's a disadvantage, but the way you say it makes it sound like it results in a terribly slow development experience where you're constantly waiting for it to start.

The truth is, the development experience actually gives you much faster feedback with almost no waiting time as compared to the majority of other languages.

That means the impact of the slow startup isn't really felt.

I think where slow startup is a bigger issue is actually for certain production use cases, like CLIs, or serverless settings. There it would be awesome if Clojure JVM also started in sub-millisecond, and we didn't have to change to Clojure interpreted like babashka, or Clojure GraalVM native compilation.
Ask HN: Why does HN not use any CDN?
I see periodic slow-downs and hung page loads on HN. This got me curious. I see HN is served from a M5 hosting IP address without any CDN in front of it. Is it a conscious choice to not use CDN even to this day?

p.s: I also saw an old post by pg about /unban?ip=. I tried that and got an unbanned/sorry response. But that didn't make any difference to the slowness I see. If my IP was indeed banned, I'm even more curious. I don't believe there's any abuse traffic coming my IP.
While we lack spatial resolution in the periphery, we can be very sensitive to movement or changes there. So I think you would need a pretty accurate and stable low resolution rendering method to avoid inducing unintended perceptions of movement.

I assume saving power means skipping a lot of processing, which sounds to me like undersampling i.e. the opposite of the supersampling used to get good renderings today. But, it is hard for me to imagine how a generic 3D modeled scene can be undersampled for the periphery without introducing horribly unnatural aliasing artifacts. In other words, you still need to determine proportional occlusion and lighting of all the elements in the scene to understand which blurry colors to show. You can't just cast a few rays and stretch them to fill the periphery. Otherwise, slight camera or object movements might lead to chaotic flashing of peripheral colors as the reduced samples stochastically observe different scene elements while ignoring the rest.

I know of things like multi-resolution texture pyramids which can precompute a blurred version to allow undersampled texture rendering. And I know many games switch between different low/high polygonal representations of objects (or even cull objects) based on distance to the camera, which often produces obvious "popping" artifacts as the user moves through the 3D world. Are there general scene modeling techniques that can work as smoothly as multi-resolution textures to allow rapid or simultaneous use of different levels of geometric detail in one rendering?

I think those popping artifacts would be much more distracting if tied to every eye movement rather than only with navigation across a 3D world. Crude, culling methods would be inadequate if they just drop peripheral objects that might otherwise produce the kind of peripheral image that would cause the user to change their gaze...
Required reading for discussing any of this is "Is there anything good about men"?

According to this, there's a preference (genetic and societal) to condition men to take risks, and that risk skews the distribution outward, with more failures and successes.

One of the main punchlines is that comparing means is useless. Men just have way more outliers in both directions, and grades (maximum-capped) will tend to be lower on average, while income (no maximum cap) will tend to be higher on average.
Amazon Prime does that as well.
It's not a subtlety you're missing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(human_categorization)
Same thing happened to us. I wouldn't trust GCP anymore.
The further I get into python, the more inclined I am to work with the REPL.
Please cite it. Every time someone claims this, they come back citing something laughably easy to disprove like The Bell Curve, which claims this, and is just an absolute mess of obvious nonsense:

Using deeply culturally and/or language biased IQ tests.

Using IQ tests that essentially just test the quality of education they received.

Sampling unrepresentative populations.

Using studies from an Apartheid state as an example of "a state without systemic racism".

Using tests that aren't IQ tests and the author explicitly say isn't equivalent and "converting" them with arbitrary systems.
Literally just making up data.

Cherry picking the worst data from studies which the original study explicitly calls out as less likely to be accurate.

Every correlation vs causation mistake you can possibly make.

Just discounting every environmental factor except parental socioeconomic status.

Assuming environmental factors are a result of genetic factors (which is literally just assuming their conclusion).

Regularly citing a literally white-supremacist funded source as unbiased.
Well in that case it isn't strictly 'profit' but rather just benefit. In the same way that antisocial urban development isn't necessarily profitable per se, it just allows the people doing it to reap all the benefits while pushing the burden onto society as a whole.
well->people[2].are(likely, to, like, this, better);

compared to this

((Person->are ((array-at (Prefix->people well) 2)) ....

Please fix it for me, I can't be bothered.

(Yes, this is an exaggerated example but this really is the point. Also, static types. If there's anything of overarching regularity in what you type, it better be syntax or it will be hard to check and take advantage of. This is what Algol-style languages do for systems programming.)
If Telefunc is bug-free (which I intend to be the case), then you won't need to debug Telefunc itself.

For error tracking, Telefunc has hooks for that.

For debugging user-land, you can `console.log()` just like you would with normal functions.

Do you see a concrete use case where this wouldn't suffice?
Good. They were massively over leveraged.

I hope they don’t get bailed out by tax payers.

Any customers with accounts should be free to withdraw, but please don’t let the company operate if they were acting recklessly
It's an Italian company that was very recently bought by a Chinese company.

My understanding is that they saw the usefulness of these machines quite early and were developing them in this direction and that they had already produced 4000 tonne presses of this general type. Now it's at 6000 and 8000 tonnes.

Customers are needed to make use of good ideas-- you can't take them otherwise, but the innovation is the work the Italians did.
Ask HN: How to get started with real-time Linux?
I would like to learn and work on both software and hardware of real-time Linux. Any books or projects do you recommand for getting started?
Not sure what it has to do with "age discrimination". If you're implying that big corporations lay off older people disproportionally, then that's illegal and should be handled through the courts.

I agree that many talented folks will be laid off, but not nearly in the numbers that will make a dent in the overall talent crunch. See my response to klabb3 above.
Toyota is probably only company who understands that poor people can't afford BEVs and will be left behind. And introducing another EV Hummer or Cybertruck for 100k USD won't really help them to get affordable EV.

I am convinced that BEV are not the future, because there is not enough of material, especially there is not enough copper.

Assoc Prof Simon Michaux on shortage of copper https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBVmnKuBocc

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/14/copper-is-key-to-electric-ve...
I think things are at the point where having more clarity would be more helpful than having a bunch of settled cases with no clear precedent, because they were too expensive to litigate.
NPM typosquatting attack targeted popular packages with 1.5B weekly downloads
Indeed, but panic is easier because in some ways checking if a program can panic is akin to checking if the program links the panic function.

And that's pretty easy to statically analyze.
Similar for cocktails.
And I also propose no alternative that would allow this, other than the support of people who have a desire to support artists.
That's not what "trivial property" means w.r.t. Rice's Thm.

The point is that you can produce a perfectly working analysis method that is either sound or complete but not both. "Nowhere in the entire program does the call 'panic()' appear is a perfectly workable analysis - it just has false positives.
tbh never heard of ketamine psychosis
There are several gems - my family easily spent 1000+ hours on Wittcher 3, Zelda, Hades or Animal Crossing - but most of the games are just too bland.

I'm a fan of cloud gaming and have used both Stadia and Xbox Cloud Gaming. It appeals to me, as I don't have to invest in a gaming rig and can play on almost everything.
imapsync for example or drag'n'drop/filter in Thunderbird. Not that difficult.
To be fair, the 801 wasn't a microprocessor, and it's L1 wasn't on die (because it's CPU wasn't a single die to begin with). It was implemented in MECL-10K which is at the sameish level of die integration as TTL, just a decent amount faster.
Karl Marx predicted this. See: Estranged Labor (1844)

https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/manuscripts...
A few years ago I dedicated a couple of days to finding any evidence of documentation for the 801 beyond a small number of well known academic papers, but found none. It really bothers me, probably to an unreasonable degree, how common it is for corporations to neglect such an easy win. IBM is really bad about it, especially considering how long of a history they have - just look at how anemic their public facing corporate archives page is. Yes, they had a long running tradition of publishing very low level papers in publicly accessible journals, a huge number of very important papers... but when they killed off their internal journals that served as the fountain head for the effort - their chosen steward quickly locked it all behind a paywall. Young engineers WANT to revere their elders while bringing forward the state of the art, and there have been some good efforts made in the collection of narratives, but engineers need work product (not English lit) in order to do the ancients justice. There aren't enough articles like this, so my thanks to the author - well done... but his job could easily be made so much less difficult by corporations taking advantage of something with such a long tail of public good will: preserving and then releasing obsolete work product.
Soldering Crash Course
It would seem to be exponential after the first collision, at least.
Would you call someone who's primary goal is to due good deeds a "good person"? Would you call someone who's primary goal is to due reprehensible deeds a "reprehensible person"?

People certainly can change over time, but someone's state at a given time is what that person actually is at the time.
Checking from the UK, it’s available on Netflix, Disney+ and Amazon Prime.

What region are you in?
That seems pretty slow, I've never had it take more than 5 seconds, even on large enterprise backend services.

Maybe your service was also initializing a lot of state/components on startup?
I feel like there is an underlying problem here that Rust tries to be
a "safe" language while "safety" isn't well defined. Rust said that
crashing a process is always safe so that when something unexpected
happens we can always resort to crashing so that we don't risk doing
anything unsafe.

The problem is that this definition of safety is very arbitrary.
Sometimes crashing a process can be safe (as in not causing serious
problems) but sometimes not. Accessing an array out of bounds can be
safe sometimes and sometimes not, and so on.

Rust says that here is a list of things that are always safe and here
is a list of things that are always unsafe and then people want safety
everywhere so they take that definition of safety to other contexts
where it doesn't make sense, like the kernel.
Additionally Pine64 is putting out a board with the same JH7110 chip too.
Turing machines have a set of states and a transition function that governs how it moves between states. The transition function is a bunch of mappings like this:

(input state, input symbol) --> (output state, output symbol, move left/right)

This is all static, so you can look at the transition table to see all the possible output symbols. If no transition has output symbol 1, then it never outputs 1. It doesn't matter how big the Turing machine is or what input it gets, it won't do it. This is basically trivial, but it's still a type of very simple static analysis that you can do. Similarly, if you don't have any states that halt, the machine will never halt.

This is like just not linking panic() into the program: it isn't going to be able to call it, no matter what else is in there.
How would it compare to other REPL languages? EG: Python, Scala or Julia?
If copyright laws were removed, would we still have movies that cost $200 million to make? Probably not. Do we really need them? Not really. Cheaper movies would still be made, though.

I've seen a lot of low budget movies that were better than the $200m ones. I don't need special effects to enjoy a movie, I need a plot. Check out "Dark Star", made for $50,000. It's far, far better than 95% of the scifi movies out there. Because it had an interesting plot. "Primer" is another example.