skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> I don't think any of that can be captured by whatever neuro-binding effect is being mimicked by these designed molecules

Agreed, it sound like they do not cause any hallucinations, so you would likely not "see the face of evil".

> it was diet and exercise and commitment to changing my life and talking to a therapist that was what helped;

Speaking from my armchair, from what I understand about clinical depression, these are the things that someone who is not depressed can do because they "crave" them. For people who are depressed, there is a (possibly intermittent) neurological imbalance that is preventing them from craving these things which would otherwise keep them functioning normally. While it may be possible to power through the depression, and do these things until the imbalance is resolved, I would argue that this is only due to a temporary break or recession of their depressive symptoms, something that an effective antidepressant should aim to do.

I'm not claiming my view is true, I'm looking for feedback on how correct/incorrect my view is.
UI should allow you to choose from the images and get the artist name.
It comes down to first principles. Are we basing our values & worth on merit (being productivity or social impact & what defines productivity or social impact), equality, equity, classifications? What we base our values & worth will determine how the downstream systems are designed & what they optimize for.
He wrote:

> In the kernel, "panic and stop" is not an option (it's actively worse
than even the wrong answer, since it's really not debugable), so the
kernel version of "panic" is "WARN_ON_ONCE()" and continue with the
wrong answer.

(edit, and):

> Yes, the kernel will continue (unless you have panic-on-warn set), because the kernel
MUST continue in order for that "report to upstream" to have a chance of happening.

Did I read that right? The kernel must continue? Yes, sure, absolutely...but maybe it doesn't need to continue with the next instruction, but maybe in an error handler? Is his thinking so narrow? I hope not.
So honest question. I presume you spent months on those LC questions.

Do you feel that they were beneficial in terms of making you a better developer, or did you simply learn a bunch of solutions to puzzles that have no bearing on real world development?
I’m running a subscription-based service, but I’ve stalled at 57% market penetration. Can you give me some advice on how I can double my market penetration from this point?

Remember, what I’m looking for is 114% market penetration. Any help you can provide will be gratefully appreciated.
> Haskell/FP community

As someone who worked on a lot of OCaml projects, I would like to assure you that the issue really is the Haskell community which I too find completely unbearable. The rest of the FP community is far nicer/less smug.

For a long time, they just thought it was a shame some innovative constructs seemed to be stuck in their favourite languages (first class functions, variant types, inference) and not percolating to the mainstream. This fight has mostly be won which is great.
When I clicked the first link in the article, I though it was an image map too.
I concur, and it's a shame they have chosen to make a bunch of noise and pass the blame rather than see if they have an issue.

Even Gmail's own interface ("show original " I think) will display a failure of the DMARC check and is a useful testing tool.

Sadly noise like this adds a misleading boost to the "it's impossible to run your own email server" sentiment, but I don't believe this is as true as people make out (yet).

I started this post to say thanks for sharing the mail-tester.com website. I just tested my own setup and found it thoroughly useful.
No, panic is not halting, you just need some static check to check that you never call some functions that can panic in your code. Essentially it is just checking if some code (panic) might be reachable, if it is not, it will never panic (but it can still do other crazy things).

Note that we can only check for maybe, because in general we don't know if some code in the middle will somehow execute forever and never reach the panic call after it.
Would it make it more ok if people were?

How many people are joining? How many people are joining because or in lieu of Linus? How many people are joining just because it’s Linux/Git/whatever (although granted that is in part due to Linus making them such big things)? How many people would have joined/wouldn’t have left if he wasn’t there?
I think, if the wording was exactly "Rust is safe" it is indeed too vague as there are many notions of safety, and annoyingly enough people do say this. But "Rust provides memory safety" is clear enough and doesn't need further quantification.
Nobody is maintaining file hierachies, but everyone manages files, folders, whether they are explicitly exposed via file manager or not.

These are organizational concepts, not software concepts. People, even mobile uni students, have and must master them. As a result they get reinvented constantly in/as apps.

What people are mad about is people are told 'this is how you will organize' rather than just learning to organize. It is absolutely fucking stupid.
Many people make a distinction when the firmware is stored on the hardware and loaded by the hardware itself vs stored in the filesystem and loaded in cooperation between system software and the hardware.

Personally, this distinction doesn't make that much sense, if the firmware is opaque in both instances, eliminating (or vastly reducing) onboard storage seems like a cost reduction step that benefits the manufacturer and the user. [1] A more important distinction to me is if the interface documentation and drivers are open or closed.

[1] unless the device class is one that could be a boot time device, except that firmware loading would be required --- it's hard to pxe boot from a network card if it doesn't function without a firmware upload, and that's not good for users who may want to pxe boot at some point
Using python it's quite straightforward to convert between numpy arrays and sparse arrays, which are basically the graph represtation of the same data.
I think "acrimony" among languages (not language communities) is fine, like "you don't have an Option type?" or "you don't guarantee I won't have a use after free?". I think saying the "The Go/Rust/Zig community is uniquely toxic" crosses a line. And, to be very clear, if Rust people do it, I think it's awful as well.
There are a lot of plusses to Radpower bikes. Overall I think they're in a real sweet spot for features + affordability for a lot of people.
SekaiCTF 2022 – Matryoshka
And RedPanda uses WebAssembly as an execution engine to keep with the WASM theme here. https://redpanda.com/blog/wasm-architecture
> Not completing the operation... well, it is not good, but that's it.

Depends on what the operation is. If the operation is flying an airplane or controlling a nuclear reaction, you are sure that not completing the operation and just aborting the program is the worst outcome possible. Beside the error can crash the plane or melt down the nuclear reactor, but may also not have any effect at all, e.g. a buffer overflow overwrites a memory area that is not used for anything important.

Of course these are extreme example (for which Linux is of course out of discussion since it doesn't offer the level of safety guaranteed required), but we can make other examples.

One example could be your own PC. If you use Linux, take a look at the dmesg output and count the number of errors: there are probably a lot of them, for multiple reason. You surely want your system to continue running, and not panic on each of them!
See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33057059.
Seems like a stupid thing to make an article about if it's really as narrow as "we don't know what Andy Warhol would've done if the roles were reversed,". And if we're saying there's no room for discussing the questions surrounding the topic.

Also seems like a pretty poor piece if that's the point and they don't investigate or mention any history, like the Elaine Sturtevant stuff.
I find the screen reader experience of

- image: handwritten.blog

- image: handwritten post

- link (image): comment on this post

- link (image): read the transcript of this post

- link (image): back to main page

not bad at all. Sure, it would be better if the transcript was just part of the page, but I understand the tradeoff and it's quick enough to get to the transcript.
About 20 years ago, I was at a pharmaceutical company and, to put together a web application,
- we had to buy a prod and a dev database server
- we had to buy a prod and a dev application server
- we needed Oracle as a database
- we needed a DBA, a sysadmin, and a hardware team
- we needed Tomcat / Java and Oracle development expertise

The idea of developing and running this application with a single person would have been laughable.

Today, because tools are soooo accessible, I can, and do, routinely spin up my own VM, apply Puppet, drop my MySQL and Django containers onto that VM, and pull https certificates in addition to doing the front and back end software development.

Life would be waaay simpler if I could just write server side web application code and wait around for database developers, sys admins, and front-end folks to do their thing. Imagine not having to learn a testing harness because there are actually people testing the software!
In an average checkered square North American city, every second street or avenue reserved to any and all personal transportation not larger than a cargo trike, not longer than a tandem bike. From there you can have one ways, two ways, fast lanes, non-powered lanes, longer green lights than cross car streets, overpass, underpass, etc. The Works.

You keep boulevards and any street with speed limitations over 30mph to cars and trucks. You arrange for permanent secured and weatherized personal parking and storage areas on street sides, back alleys, and/or other public places

It's that simple. No change to zoning, no fancy street rebuilding, nothing else different from what already is.

Your street doesn't have cars in it? You park next street. You're disabled and can't walk a hundred feet? Get a trike. Or a folding anything you shove in the trunk of your car. Delivery companies can do cargo trikes.

But hey, let's be real for a moment and acknowledge you'd instantly get giant pickup truck twats ramming into bike lanes for not liking where evolution goes. As always.
I pretty much had to do the same in high school because apparently it was unreadable to them (not to me though...)
Guy makes mistake and even after that continues discussion though he already heard the agreed argument?

I'm not understanding that if Linuxrusters want to do more their own thing and get rid of those rules and discussions they just fork off a real Linuxrustkernel and go off?

The "political correct" toxicity comes from that group which continously wants to undermine long beforehand agreeds frontiers... (e.g. again this panic-is-more-safe discussion).
> Linus goes nuclear. And while his reasoning is sound, his argumentation cycles between threats, bad-faith arguments, and just plain old yelling.

In my opinion, in the software world, there is a large number of people who are very convinced of their own correctness. When they do something wrong or are simply mistaken, a gentle correction doesn't work. Linus is probably used to dealing with these people. I'm not saying the person he was replying to was necessarily doing that, but after a while you have an automatic response.

The beauty and horror of OSS is that anyone can contribute. Having someone scream "WTF are you doing???" every once in a while isn't a bad thing. It's not nice to hear that being directed at you, but sometimes in life it is necessary.
There's a link to the transcript at the bottom.
> I think learning should generally be as pleasant as possible.

If you want pleasant learning on the Internet, don't "learn by teaching" through blogs that mislead other learners, even if only in terminology use.

People will tear that apart.
This article shatters the myth The Atlantic publishes anything worth reading.
Don't be an ass.

Affordability and access is a major issue here in the US, even with employer provided insurance. Most aren't making tech level salaries nor benefits, nevermind those who are unemployed and don't meet stringent requirements in states that haven't adopted medicaid expansion.
If resources are limited (and they're always limited) you invest into the highest ROI options.

Exceptional people have a chance of pushing society forward (i.e. creating more resources for the future... exponentially).

(But yeah in general I oppose age-segregated schooling, I think education should have "tracks" (math, physics, sports, music, etc.) and people should attend whatever "level" they're at in each track, in mixed-age groups. And make mostly free (but guided) choices regarding which tracks to put most effort in.)
The Hunting of the (ZK-) Snark
Setting up a Nomad cluster on Linux
The new conscripts won't make a difference, Russia has already lost the war in Ukraine even if they don't know it yet.

The next step for the West is figure out how to get rid of Putin and then de-zombify the Russian population so that they can keep their own leaders in check next time.
...this is not at all Linus going nuclear. I don't see any threats or 'yelling'. He could have been more diplomatic, and I think Linus was actually trying to be. Diplomacy isn't his strongest suit. I don't think the first comment in his reply was necessarily appropriate, because it was directed at the person rather than the problem. I can also understand not wanting to mince words and establish a very firm boundary so it doesn't become a perennial conversation.
There’s always a twist. Now you get to do the old things with an expensive gadget.
I thought a company like Snap didn’t make a profit, so I dont think the employees are netting 7 figures for the company? That probably only applies to Google, FB, Apple, Amazon?
I'm also involved in recruiting, and the biggest change I see is that folks who were laid off or pushed out of prestigious tech companies are now in the market. These are not your "top talent", these folks are still happily employed at their BigN job.

I hear similar stories about 2001. The folks who get laid off are mostly the lower performing engineers, who clear the lower hiring bars typical of frothy economic times.
Think of it as elaborating, rather than disclaiming. There is a real problem in the realm of Rust advocacy where people make a blanket claim, either wrongfully assuming it is true or assuming that others are aware of the limitations of the claim. This is a problem when the reader is not aware of the limits of what is being said, while creating conflict when the reader calls out the limitations.

Reading a book on Rust programming is an entirely different matter since authors tend to elaborate upon what they are claiming. The reader has to understand how things work and what the limits are. As such, there is less opportunity for misinformation to spread and less room for conflict.
Linear-Feedback Shift Register
What? Wasn't ANSI CL standardized in 1994? Besides incremental performance and security improvements, what needs to change?

Compare this to other popular languages from C++ to Python, which surely generate tons of additional work by continually changing the languages themselves.
Degrowth
> of course it's always been the unix way to be strong-silent without have a lot of "informative" message clutter

Unix is for silent success. I don't think there is any overall culture about what to do on errors.

But anyway, when you lose your home dir, your computer becomes obviously broken. Your a bit more than mine, but it's the obviousness that is important. (Anyway, I don't gain anything from the extra functionality my system holds when compared to yours. It's always a hardware problem, a X session is useless.)
Every <a> is empty! No text at all! This site is barely usable let alone accessible.
The trade off is that the hundreds of games that I previously bought can be played, there’s no censorship or artificial restrictions in the game stores, and any games I buy in the future won’t be lost to the collapse of a single service, since I can just reinstall them on any other PC (cloud or not). Personally, that’s worth the minor inconvenience of an update screen. And, this is an implementation detail. Shadow could easily provide scheduled updates for Windows,
and Steam/whatever popular store games.

> manually logging in

You should try shadow. You just open the Shadow app in whatever device, it boots, and you’re in. No login.

You do have to boot with a different device, first for VR with their Quest app (implementation detail of the Beta) or Virtual Desktop (required).
idk. Could it be that the whole premise is simply wrong here? That in fact openness to experience is just not useful as a description of personality?

When I talk about openness to experience it means exactly what the author is complaining about, openness to try out new food, to try to take the train instead of flying, and yes, try some drugs, etc. For me—and a bet to most people—it has no further implications or generalizations about people’s personalities.

And the fact that psychometrisians have—after decades—still failed to demonstrate convincingly any such implications or generalizations, might indicated that the general public is right, and the scientists are wrong.

This isn’t nuanced they way that the author thinks it is. Say this is how I understand the term, but I bet that when a boss talks about it, they think of the willingness to take on new tasks and responsibilities within a company (hopefully without asking for a pay raise in return), and to an upper class art elite it can mean visiting an Escher gallery or a Mozart concert (though for me, seeing a no-name punk band is a sign of more openness then established brands).

The nuance isn’t in the personality of the person believed to hold this trait, it is in the user of that term. And I think the confusion stems from believing this is some scientifically useful term, used to describe a trait of personality that might not even exist.
I get where you are coming from but this seems like gatekeeping to me? Who here determines whether or not the author is depressed? Do they need to delve into their past traumas to satisfy the critics?
That doesn't matter.

It is his project and people are free ton join or start their own.
I suspect that one is a super heater.
Where in the paper is the distribution of answers over the four possible choices discussed ? The fact that the number of correct answers is close to what you would expect if the students were guessing randomly does not imply that the actual distribution of responses was uniform.

EDIT: In addition the conditions under which this test were given could matter a lot. How much time did the students have to answer ? Did they have access to scratch paper or did they have to do everything in their heads ? If they only had 5 seconds to answer I wouldn't find a random distribution of responses all that surprising.
How come the faces features and body parts are almost always at the same place on the image ?
The truth is that it's highly subjective to each individual and simply because it has gotten better for some, doesnt make it a solved issue (and still makes it a non-starter for people effected).
Ok, im going to sound very ignorant here and im sorry for that. Do deaf people have trouble reading words as well?
I think it might be a bit more complicated than that, considering you can have static data and unwinding the stack will not reset those states. I guess you still need some sort of task level abstraction and reset all the data for that task when unwinding from it. Btw, do we need stack unwinding or can we just do a sjlj?
> Their apparent addiction to hiring full time diversity officers on six figure salaries is a neuralgic one, not so much because of the scale of the waste (small) but because it's so obviously waste, so easy to fix and so obviously designed purge the NHS of anyone who isn't ideologically pliant, regardless of the political cost of provoking large numbers of taxpayers and voters.

How would you propose managing programs to equalize quality of care across populations when conscious, unconscious, human, and automated biases exist?
Relative to OpenCL, you mean?
I noticed that too! I'm guessing they used the same seeds, which does a great job of providing a comparison in style.
A staff that is both dependent on and united by having the same, consistent politics throughout the company (and all companies).

More eloquently put by this comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33053801
I got your game in a Humble Bundle some seasons ago and it’s been great! Love designing gardens and elaborate buildings in it, great work!
Sure but with emacs you’d have to do it in MacTerm or another chunk of telnet software, set up a LocalTalk network, etc. whereas this only requires a serial cable and also gives you a native Mac UI to do your editing in
Some of these come from companies that do this "as a service", even if you didn't ask for it. They can remove your IP address. I do not know what motive they have to scan third party websites, but it can't be kosher.
Another way of putting it: once it's obviously a huge success you're too late.
Training-Free Diffusion Guidance for Text-to-Image Synthesis
Michelin star level mashed potatoes are like a third butter, not even exaggerating.
DVC is great for use cases that don't get to this scale or have these needs. And the issues here are non-trivial to solve. I've spent a lot of time figuring out how to solve them in Pachyderm which is good for use cases where you do need higher levels of scale or might run into merge conflicts with DVC. There's trade-offs though. DVC is definitely easier for a single developer / data scientist to get up and running with.
Unless I'm mistaken that means it won't be included out of the box but will instead be available to download and install from ELPA, right?
SpaceX too inconvenient?
Right, the fact that you can toggle those sysctls is sort of the point. There are plenty of environments where running at all is better than not, hardware watchdogs can solve for unresponsiveness.

TFA is about making it possible for the kernel to decide what to do, rather than exploding on the spot, which is terrible.
Goes against the idea that all users should have "full and equal enjoyment" of a site instead of a "separate but equal" version just for "them."
> I'm still getting recruiter emails from many of the recent companies that have publicly said they are freezing/slowing down hiring

I wonder what a recruiter at a company with a hiring freeze in place is expected to do? I'd be inclined to say, "well then I'll be on vacation until you need me, thanks for keeping the paychecks coming", but I suspect that wouldn't work so well. I think they would want to "keep the pipeline flowing" or however you'd want to say it for a mix of practical as well as BS reasons.
Radioactive Substances in Watches
Just in case, since your statement is ambiguous.[1]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Standard_candles
Mitigating the Noisy Neighbour Multitenancy Problem
Alabama tried and failed to kill Alan Eugene Miller
Yes, but what I am talking about is the professional side. Sibling comments are talking about the Nov 1st launch games who were in the dark. Obviously Google can make it right - but that doesn't seem like what they are going to do.
Well, you've edited your reply a couple times, so it's a moving target, but:

> * Panic and shut it all down. This prevents any reporting mechanism like a core dump. You cannot attach a normal debugger to the kernel.

No one is really advocating that. Clearly you need to be able to write code that fails at a smaller granularity than the whole kernel. See my comment upthread about what I mean by that: dynamic errors fail smaller granularity tasks and handlers deal with tasks failing due to safety checks going bad.