skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
MS Power Automate and Power platform..Top low-code vendors include Appian, Retool, Salesforce Platform, Creatio, Oracle Application Express, and ServiceNow App Engine.

What is low-code?

Low-code is a visual approach to software development. Rather than manually developing an application with high-code languages, like HTML, Javascript, or Python, low-code lets you use visual drag and drop tools to build applications.

https://appian.com/why-appian/low-code-4-all.html

What is low-code?
Low-code is an application development method that elevates coding from textual to visual.

Rather than a technical coding environment, low-code operates in a model-driven, drag-and-drop interface. All development skill levels — professional developers, novice developers, subject matter experts, business stakeholders, and decision makers — can use low-code to build value-driven enterprise business applications.

https://www.mendix.com/platform/

Take all of these claims with an ocean of salt
The person Carlsen accused of cheating has a documented and admitted history of it. Officials literally found weights inside the fish. Both of those are in this story.
I sub to a lot of web3 and crypto ones, but my favorites are:

For DeFi + general crypto knowledge that's up to date: https://newsletter.banklesshq.com/

For learning about blockchain tech and trends in web3: https://toolsforcrypto.substack.com/
Software can be verified to be correct, stupidity of others is unavoidable.
This is true for other devs as well. I started playing around with networking code as a teenager (back when port 80 (before 443) was prominent but not the clear majority of traffic on the net.) Watching the evolution of TCP, HTTP, the C10K problem, retry storms, and event loops has made a lot of sense: clear responses to clear issues. But I've noticed a lot of junior devs grow up with the solutions (nginx, haproxy, exponential backoff, etc) but don't know the problems that necessitated the solutions. A lot of junior training is teaching juniors which solutions to apply to which problems, because unlike us they didn't watch the field evolve to where it is now.
Who stops you from deploying with FTP? :)
I wonder why the joint world’s largest ICE maker would argue against a technology they haven’t developed to the same standard as nearly every one of their competitors. Weird.

Surely he’s only thinking of the environmental consequences and shared material constraints of manufacturing so many vehicles.

Couldn’t be that they planned for a slower adoption and the pandemic accelerated the curve and now they’ve fallen behind. Couldn’t be that they failed to secure critical contracts thinking that this attempt at scaling would fall short and then they could pick up those same contracts later for cheap.
The outcomes have been underwhelming because we (at least, the US) haven't actually been doing this, and we've just found new and arguably worse ways to maintain deeply racist policies.
But again it’s not uncommon to believe your opponent is chasing a card especially in this case - straight and flush draw and the straight is below your top card. If it’s a straight draw they have, you know you have them beat. And going all in pre-river on your draws is the main tactic you’d expect to see.
ByteByteGo https://blog.bytebytego.com/

A ton of explanations of various software design patterns, architectures, deep explanations of things a lot of developers will only understand at a higher level like HTTPS, proxies, SQL, how live streaming works, how credit card payments work. It's a fountain of knowledge.
This is a really good point, and I appreciate you bringing it up. What I am saying directly conflicts with affirmative action itself, so in effect I am arguing against it. I don't really have a good answer to that. Thanks for pointing it out, I guess I'll ponder that for awhile.
Reducing racial bias to solely and precisely "skin color", and not the cultural biases that come with it is itself missing the point.

Begin biased against Black skin is a problem (and is the important bit in some instances). Being biased against "Black" names is also a problem, even if you can devise situations where the name is attached to a person who doesn't have Black skin. And both are racism, because they are directed at people based on the assumption that they are in a particular ethnic group, even if that assumption is wrong.
Knowing about a cheater and not telling other poker players about it is a really good way to destroy your reputation in the poker world.

Poker players, in the almost 20 years I've been playing, have a pretty standard policy of outing guys who cheat, steal, angle, and owe. Particularly in the high stakes world.

The cheating accusations did not originate with the players in the game, anyway. Garrett maybe told a story with his eyeballs--he's maybe uniquely qualified to do that. But his first mention of "cheating" was after it had already blown up, trust me.

It was on a livestream, it wasn't a subtle event, and people love controversy.
> His response to the call feels a bit like Michael Scott in the episode Casino Night. "I went all in, you should fold, I have good cards".

You're misunderstanding. His response (and the response from the rest of the poker community) isn't based on any call, it's based on a call with her specific hand. That's the suspicious part (and her behaviour after the hand). Garett has bluffed and been called and lost many times and not accused the other player of cheating.
What is better for a desktop user:

1) needing to reload a wifi driver to reinitialize hardware (with a tiny probability of memory corruption) OR choosing to reboot as soon as convenient (with a tiny probability of corrupting the latest saved files)

2) to lose unsaved files for sure and not even know what caused the crash
There's that, but also people are now turning down free, potentially lifesaving vaccines as an expression of their political identity. Dying on a ventilator to spite your perceived political enemies is not sending a very strong message of disapproval to the elite.
No alcohol consumption means you're at zero risk of you driving drunk and injuring yourself while on the road.
Moorland such as you get in Scotland, where people want to "rewild" it by planting massive amounts of non-native trees to claim giant tax breaks, do just fine getting set on fire every so often.

Left wild you end up with heather growing over a metre deep in some places, and then a thunderstorm at just the right wrong time will set it all off, and then you've got thousands of acres of burning oily woody stuff that you simply cannot extinguish.

But hey let's just bang on about "greedy farmers burning away all the wildlife for grouse moors". Pretty sure I'd have seen at least one grouse shoot in 40-odd years of living in the area.
It all seems like predictable outcomes of capitalism run amuck.

At least it's not illegal yet to live without credit cards and/or lead a frugal life.

But it is arguably part of the problem IMO that credit scores have become so necessary it's difficult if not impossible to find an apartment without one. That alone is a forcing function pushing young Americans to rely on credit, greasing those consumer wheels by decoupling their spending from their earning at a young age.
You used to be able to use a Chrome Mobile bookmarklet to trigger view source, which was kind of handy, but it got broken several years back unfortunately.
Get a Model Y instead of a Model 3 if you can swing it and don't mind the crossover platform vs. sedan. The number of parts in a Model Y is even less than a 3 due to the gigacastings. Plus: hatchback! Who doesn't love a hatchback?
Off topic: I've downvoted you about five times today, and I really ought to explain why. You have good content, and it pains me to have to downvote.

I'm downvoting you because of the absurd thing you do with your dates.

What's absurd about it?

1. It's not the standard way of writing dates. (Communication is about finding things understood the same way between speaker and listener; non-standard usage messes with that.)

2. Because of #1, it's harder to read. It looks wrong. We have to take a half-second to think about it every single time. Multiply that by several posts a day, and also by hundreds of people reading each post, and it starts to add up to enough time to matter. This particular post is worse, because of all the CPU numbers that are five digits, and your year numbers start matching the pattern in our heads for CPU numbers.

3. It's trying to grind a Long Now axe, in a post that has nothing to do with anything related (other than having a year number in it). It's like, would you find it annoying if there was a zealous Christian on here, who had to work a reference to Jesus into every single post that mentioned philosophy or sociology? You might even find it annoying enough to start downvoting every time they did it.

So, please. Stop. If you're talking only to Long Now people, use the Long Now date format. If you're trying to explain the Long Now to everyone else, explain the dates as part of that. But if you're talking to everyone else about the history of RISC, just use everyone else's date format.
Finding evidence is very difficult. A year or two ago there was an infamous case with a man named Mike Postle. There was 0 hard evidence of him cheating but his decision making was so statistically improbable that the entire poker community is certain that he cheated.

These players, especially in poker absolutely need to be paranoid or they will be robbed.

At a certain point we are going to need to subject suspicious players to cavity searches.
> Whereas I don't believe I've seen a project fail because too much time was spent ensuring code was well written and well tested.

Oh I definitely have. In fact I'd wager that it's the leading cause of failure for programmer lead startups. It's far too easy to spend time worrying about code and ignoring the business when your skillset lies in code and not in business.
The video is damming
I had the following - and luckily they worked great under Linux (Ubuntu LTS or Lubuntu):

Lenovo ThinkPad x61s
Lenovo ThinkPad x220
Lenovo ThinkPad x230
Lenovo ThinkPad
Lenovo ThinkPad x1
DELL Latitude E7450 and similar

Problematic:

Lenovo ThinkPad x240 - hypersensitive touchpad makes mouse pointer jumpt while writing text
War itself is terrible.

The machinery, ingenuity, and eventual incorporation of some of that technology into civilian life is important and possibly the only way to get funding for new technologies by the (US) government.

The NRO offered two spy satellites (I believe rumored to be Keyhole family satellites) to NASA back in 2011/2012 -- neither have launched yet, but they have the same sized mirror as the Hubble, but with a better focal length giving the satellites a 100 times wider field of view. The now-named Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope is scheduled to launch by Nov 2026 on a Falcon Heavy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_National_Reconnaissance_O...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Grace_Roman_Space_Telesc...

The NRO also donated Keyhole satellite mirrors to create the Multiple Mirror Telescope.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MMT_Observatory#Multiple_Mirro...

NASA was the last to fly the SR-71 as a research platform.

Unfortunately, the military is often what pushes technology forward.
And leaves satisfied after dropping his own grain of corporate propaganda. A most fruitful day.
She could start now trying to find a remote role - technical writing, software engineering, project management. There is lots of opportunity in tech for a biologist with background in academia

that being said, y'all should probably get married and split income (and decisions) equally
I'm just saying it looks like a guilty move that would beg for more investigating, so that someone would be convicted on the looks of guilt.

People are jumping to conclusions here.
It's strange to me that importing a module puts the exported items into the scope without the module's name as namespace. Or put differently, that a module declaration doesn't automatically create a namespace with the same name. I imagine that will become a common practice anyway.
There is a lot of money involved. So I presume there is cheating involved, similar to doping.

Also the cheating schemes are hard to understand sometimes. Here is an example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edge_sorting
We waste all our time getting flamed by assholes on this website instead of programming.
K&R - The C Programming Language

CLRS - Introduction to Algorithms

Douglas E. Comer - Computer Networks and Internets

Andrew S. Tanenbaum - Computer Networks

Commodore 64 User Manual

Commodore 64: Programmer's Reference Guide

Manuals, info files from UNIX labyrinths

Old TXT books from archives…
Side note: YouTube has a policy about not questioning the results of previous elections. In Brazil, this also includes questions about the security of electronic voting machines.
The fish one went viral on its own. It’s been on the front page of Reddit in one sub or another for a couple days.
This is basically the point of Martin Fowler's seminal book Refactoring.

The book struck me as a book on unit tests much more than a book about refactoring itself, for exactly the same reason as described in the article.
Performance and stability are still godawful on Firefox Android though.
> Why? I have no clue, and VS Code is a giant of a thing

That experience is why I relentlessly bang on the drum of "do not swallow errors" because it makes troubleshooting indescribably hard

I would guess the more links in the call/dependency chain, the more opportunities for misplaced assumptions or laziness to sneak in, leading to your cited outcome
The flip side of this is all the small, 3.5-dev shops that are fast and flexible—just so they can slam hard into a wall and tie themselves into permanent knots.

While many of the inefficiencies of larger companies are, indeed, highly wasteful, it is also true that some of those inefficiencies are to increase resilience. Looking around and seeing lots of fast, flexible small companies is, at least in part, survivorship bias.
> I guess it only applies to groups they like?

This has been the rule throughout human history, and it’s unfortunate that people (some in this thread even) are discovering the first principles for the first time for why we strive to apply the same standards to everyone, and not do carve outs. Unfortunately, politics is downstream from culture, and culture is downstream from power. When elite opinion makers decide that certain things are okay, those things are okay … like mass protests and rioting during a pandemic.
> that ubiquitous functions like unwrap() panic if the programmer has made an error.

You're not wrong but you chose a hilarious example. Unwrap's entire purpose is to turn unhandled errors into panics!

Array indexing, arithmetic (with overflow-checks enabled), and slicing are examples where it's not so obvious there be panic dragons. Library code does sometimes panic in cases of truly unrecoverable errors also.
> I actually see a need to shift more people to not using cars as much or at all, and having those people walk/bike/transit.

This is the solution but I guess we’ll see how consuming our way to ‘sustainability’ works.
no, subcounty level breakdowns actually support the thesis that higher pollution is at least correlated with lower educational attainment. Don't post misinformation. "historical LA smog" isn't a statement that refutes anything. The international consensus is that pollution is bad for educational attainment as well as other iq-like metrics, this is true in India, China, Brazil, and the UK, as well as impacts of prenatal exposure being bad in NYC and internationally.
>The idea that the only cure for discrimination is discrimination is akin to saying the only cure for violence is violence. It’s abject insanity that such a notion is being advanced in society.

Absolutely not. The idea that any of this is fixable with 'forgiveness' is far more insane. You can't undo hundreds of years of systematic disenfranchisement and subjugation with forgiveness - you have to discriminate in the opposite direction.

To quote LBJ, "You do not take a person who, for years, has been hobbled by chains and liberate him, bring him up to the starting line of a race and then say, ‘You are free to compete with all the others,’ and still justly believe that you have been completely fair." That's what Kendi is saying, and he's completely right.
To get metaphysical, realize that time is a construct of the mind. "You" in your 50s in an entirely different person. The only connection you have with that person is the story in your head.

Then the question become "what should you be doing to be healthy now".

Make the most of today, everyday.
People get mad when you say this, but it doesn't necessarily contradict the fact that American's are in a rigged game and get raw deals. On top of that they have been conditioned to have extremely low self discipline and at the end of the day, screw themselves over as much as the system screws them over.

It's not about assigning fault. But if you wanted to fix the problem, understanding the role people's own decision making factors into it would be a big part of it.

The system leads them to water but at the end of the day, they choose to drink.
Jack Bogle Was a Punk – new book shows just how radical Vanguard’s founder was
Proton is just pre-built Wine with Valve patches. Wine existed for years and DXVK wasn't Valves' own project. They just sponsored some open source project and driver improvements and integrated it into Steam.

I seriously doubt that if you count every single developer that Valve hired to work on it as well as sponsored 3rd-party developers there likely gonna be 25-30 people or less.

I pretty sure that more people worked on Stadia within Google than all people working in Valve on all of their projects.
Opinion: Attention economy – in defense of adult coloring books
Sounds easy to evade. Once a machine has recorded 10+ votes since the last time it outputted a count, it could start giving a small probabilistic advantage to a preferred candidate, at the expense of other candidates. There would be no bumps, and the results would never differ by more than, say, relative 20% from the real count. E.g. if preferred candidate got 10% on one voting machine, it would give him 12%, taking the other 2% from all other candidates.

No bumps or disproportionate popularity in traditionally unpopular regions to raise suspicion.
All gyms and pools in Europe have saunas, is that not the case in the US?
Answer design questions when it's cheapest to do so. This. So much this.

But then you have to answer the question: When is it cheapest to do so?
> flares

Which do nothing for radar-guided SAMs... but pumping out chaff wouldn't be very visually impressive (if you could see it at all).

And of course, the strike package would have been accompanied by the EA-18G Growler to jam SAM radar.
I see what you are saying and understand the point.

But there should be a balance somewhere.

Lance Armstrong cheated in cycling and won 7 championships. The fact that he came out as a cheater later absolutely demolished the integrity of the whole sport. And I feel really bad for anyone who competed honestly all that time with zero chance of getting anything done given that the field is rife is cheaters.

So that extreme is also pretty devastating and chess lovers done want chess to fall into that state either
I think one of the best arguments that she didn't cheat is that it requires a lot more.

Option 1: She didn't cheat and made an incredibly bad play because she's very stupid.

Option 2: She did cheat and she made an incredibly bad play because she's basically showing off that she's cheating, which makes her very stupid.

So option 1 requires that she's really stupid, and option 2 requires that she's really stupid AND she cheated, making option 1 more likely.

That being said, it ignores a lot of the poker nuance. That's going to be lost on the discussion here, unfortunately, in spite of your comment.

I've long found you can't have any serious poker discussion here.
I think catching fire here refers to the general "this is UB and all bets are off" situation. For example, if you're data racing against an int on x86-64 Linux, you might reason that the `mov` instruction on that platform can't possibly product torn reads. And you'd be right as far as that goes. But the C/C++/Rust compiler still considers those data races UB and may still do horrible things like just deleting big chunks of your code if it manages to prove that that's what you've done.
Did someone solve the halting problem while I wasn't looking?
You're asking for more than just evidence though, you're asking for concrete proof which is very different. You can have evidence that changes your belief - people acting suspiciously their behaviour being consistent with cheating, lying, changing their story, having history of doing this in the past - all of this is perfectly valid evidence that can change your own belief about what's happening, and you should be able to speak to speak about it.

Imagine that we're flipping a coin and it keeps coming up heads every time, and I make a statement that I don't think the coin is fair. By your standards I shouldn't be able to speak until we examine the coin directly and no number of further flipping will convince you that the coin is biased (because it's technically possible that a fair coin does this too). Well, sometimes in real life we can't weigh/measure/scan the coin directly, we can only make judgments based on the flips that come out and we should be able to say that they look fishy.
I guess they conveniently left that part out of the marketing.
> Therefore, whenever you talk about safety, you first have to define which properties you mean by that.

Like “memory safety”?
New tech could provide cheaper, less-polluting way to refine crude oil
When people with the wrong opinions (on who knows what, frankly, the list keeps changing) get banned from banking systems the very same people will be in the thread defending the sanctions and censorship action.

“Just build your own bank.”
“Just build your own currency.”
I clicked the link. I regret it. Don’t watch this if you want your Sunday to stay nice.
Did you even read the comment above? Sauna usage in Finland has basically no correlation with socioeconomic status. Pretty much everyone has access to a sauna and the time to use one. Not only is it a tradition, but Finland goes to great lengths to prioritize the health and welfare of all its citizens, regardless of ones wealth.
I don't doubt there are projects that struggle or even fail due to over-engineering, but I wouldn't consider code written on the assumption it won't be needed in 6 or even 12 months' time (therefore not needing, say, code review, automated testing or even the ability to build on anything other than an individual developer's machine, which I've seen happen more times than I care to remember) to be any sort of sensible "middle ground".
Unfortunately for this theory, about 70% of C and C++ CVEs are memory safety issues, not 5%.
> Most of the pros think [she didn't cheat]

I don't have that impression. I follow about 100 pros on SM.
You are mostly correct, but a bit misinformed in two topics. One, the favourite in all the credible polls is Lula. Second, the impeachment of Dilma was due to irregular monetary policy, while Lula was investigated for unrelated corruption charges. And please do not forget to mention that Lula's guilty verdict was invalidated on the basis that the judge was himself corrupt- so now Lula is presumed innocent.
Agreed. Show up at the polls in person with government issued ID that has your picture and indicates if you are a Citizen and your address. That ID is then matched to an online database. No more of this mail in vote. Not one Citizen should have to worry about the accuracy of the vote.
Indeed, because tolerance has been a long held liberal value, and usurping it was a great way to push a more aggressive agenda.
> voting is mandatory in Brazil

What happens if you don't vote?