skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
What is your argument for the last point because that isn't clear at all.
useIntersectionObserver – A React hook for detecting intersection changes
> I found it to have same features as chrome but better privacy.

Oh boy. Edge is actually worse than Chrome in privacy and data-collection, that's a feat in itself.

Source: Trinity College, Dublin Research Paper -https://www.scss.tcd.ie/Doug.Leith/pubs/browser_privacy.pdf
Believing that money can change geology, and physics and chemistry laws, is idiotic at best.
> Benefits of the Manifest V3: none

V3 not allowing remote code execution is actually a serious benefit. Of course, this does not negate the fact that V3 is mainly there to boost the ad ecosystem of Google, but I'd never want my screen casting extension to be mining bitcoin on the background. That said, I'm not sure how this is going to scale long term, given that it sometimes takes 2+ weeks for the web store review team to approve a genuine one-line change. Lack of RCE is only going to make this review backlog bigger.
> Average internet (hence chrome user) don't even know what mod means.

Which is even more problematic. Because they will literally click random exe people send to them. And also the reason Edge decides to default to reject random unpopular unsigned exe downloaded from internet.
I use recognisable usernames in places (like here) where I'm fine with my comments being linked to my real name, and less obvious ones without explicitly hiding it places where I'd prefer my comments don't show up in Google searches for my name (e.g. Reddit - if you trawl through my reddit profile, linking it to my name is easy, and it wouldn't be a problem if you found it, but I don't get a bunch of reddit comments when I Google my name), and then totally separate user names for anything I actually want to be anonymous for.

My situation is a bit unusual in that I almost certainly have a globally unique name (my last name is a corruption of an uncommon name in Norway; said corruption occurred two places independently, and there are less than 500 people with that last name in Norway, and probably about the same in the US, and to date I've seen no indication of anyone combining it with my first name), my first name plus last initial is also unusual enough that I only rarely can't get it as a username.
Testosterone replacement therapy - your testosterone starts to decline when you hit 30 by about 1% a year. TRT replaces it to where it would be if you were a healthy twenty year old. This will allow you to train harder and recover quicker.

Stretch every day to maintain mobility. Look at something like GOWOD for a personalised program. Down Dog yoga app is brilliant as well.

Exercise:

Don’t do the same exercise two days in a row. Choose several low impact cardio exercises you enjoy and cycle between them such as:

- Rowing

- Swimming

- Cycling

- Rucking

- Aqua Jogging

- SkiErg

Do some form of resistance training. Do little and often rather than long sessions. Look at swapping traditional exercises out for more ergonomic alternatives. The aim of the game is to get volume on the muscles whilst avoiding stress on the nervous system. For example:

- Belt squats instead of back squats

- Trap bar deadlifts instead of conventional

- Swapping barbell movements for dumbbell movements

- Using sand bags and kettlebells instead of metal and rubber counterparts.

Train your explosivity. This is the first thing to go as you get older. Old men can still be insanely strong but they’re rarely as explosive as in their youth. TRT will help with this.

If your job is computer based, invest in some ergonomic office equipment. I recommend the Hag Capisco as a chair. If you get one, make sure you get the foot ring as well, it’s madness that it doesn’t come as standard. Get a split keyboard such as a ZSA Moonlander. If you get one, get a “ZSA Platform” to mount it on as well, makes it a million times better. Be prepared for a frustrating learning curve with it. I’ll post my layout for it here at some point or check my comment history where I already posted it somewhere else.

I also recommend purchasing a standing desk, such as a YoYo or Jarvis desk. Another cheaper alternative if you only need an area for a mouse and keyboard is something like the “Lifeline Cycling Table”.

The way I have found standing desks to actually work and not just get abandoned is to have the desk permanently set to standing height, and to have your chair set up at standing height too. That way you can easily switch between standing and sitting without any messing about. I used to recommend standing desk mats but don’t anymore as they often interfere with whatever chair you’re using. You end up having to faff and move them out of the way if you want to sit down and then get them back again if you want to stand. Same with the treadmill desks. Just invest in some carpet or a nice soft rug that way you get the cushioning benefits for your feet but can also move the chair around on it freely.

Eat healthy as other people have said. Invest in meal prep containers and make it as easy as possible for yourself.

Buy a Garmin or smart watch to monitor health metrics.

Journal to keep your mind healthy.

Spend time in nature.
you don't always have decades though to predict an Asteroid impact event
The supermarket is 5 miles away. You can charge that in a few minutes even on a 7kw charger.
Charging an EV with a generator is actually a more efficient way of using liquid fuel than exploding it in an engine.

The generator runs at its peak efficiency RPM at all times, car engines do not. Combine that with the 90%+ efficiency of an electric motor and you're good.
I was expecting a "light intensity vs GDP" graph to see if they really correlate.
Any more details? I definitely get impression killing old addons wasn't just change for change's sake, but I don't know the details behind it?
Those corporations work together to contribute to the same open source code base and at the same time they are trying to (commercially) kill each other. Quite a wonder.
> about 6000 people over the years.

Note that this is heavy disputed, with estimates going from under 100 to the hundreds of thousands.
Assuming you mean express' cookie parser signed cookies? Or maybe rails?

Solves some of the session problems..

Benefits:

Cookies - when set to http only + secure only are safer?

Drawbacks:

They're not cross-compatible
No expiration baked in
No not-before baked in
Limited to hmac validation (no public key crypto options that I know of)

Unless you mean using a JWT as a cookie value. I guess that could work?
Agree 100%. I would also pay for a browser that doesn't implement manifest v3 at all. If FF won't offer a paid version for some reason, why don't other people fork it and do it?
no, you need to store the jwt in a cookie(or local store) because the jwt is signed. if you would have only cookie with user id then anyone would be able to pretend to be anyone by manually setting the cookie with some user's uid.
the "several individual cells" are welded together and also a structural component of the vehicle. You are not allowed to work on them yourself to not electrocute yourself to a crisp.
I've heard people referring to code as "codes" which seems silly to me for some reason..

I kind of dislike both terms, "codes" seems to refer to each individual statement in isolation, which makes zero sense at all.
"The code" I think, refers to the entirety of a program/function/system, and makes a bit more sense.

However, code suggests something that is difficult to understand, which is the opposite of what's actually going on..

You're not "coding", you're writing a program or even programming.. If anyone is coding it's the compiler or assembler translating your easliy understood programming text into the binary machineCODE, which is actually annoying and hard to understand.
Beautiful answer. Beyond programming, our society is incredibly overstimulated. TikTok - and now YouTube reels, instagram, etc - are moving towards short form, algorithmically delivered content that gives you a quick dopamine hit for just swiping, and I think it’s killing our collective attention spans. I wonder if there will every be a movement to move away from such platforms, but for now everyone seems always wired in.
People are building their own #vanlife vans nowadays with full electric systems using panels on the roof and maybe a few they can spread around on longer stays.
R-73 and AGM-88 can also launch 'over the shoulder'
Certainly the Alcubiere warp drive requires exotic matter which may not exist.

There's now a scheme that doesn't require negative energy.

https://newatlas.com/physics/ftl-warp-drive-no-negative-ener...

It may be almost impossible to build due to the energy required, but it isn't prohibited by the physics we currently know.
Absolutely true. My grandma used to make nougat filled 'bread' and also marzipan 'potatoes' from the raw Niederegger base. The 'potatoes' are little marzipan balls dusted with cacao powder. They can also be found on Amazon.com as "Marzipan Kartoffeln".

The difference between good marzipan and the cheap stuff is the almond to sugar ratio. The cheapo marzipan is awfully sweet, no comparison to Niederegger.

We've made marzipan at home using almond flour, powdered sugar, bitter almond extract and rose water. Never managed to get anywhere close to Niederegger. Nobody knows what their secret ingredient is, like Coca Cola I suppose.

Edit: Cost Plus World Market carries Niederegger before christmas, really the most affordable we've found in the US. Can also recommend their "Schwarzbrot", which is covered with dark chocolate ("Kuvertüre").
I haven't personally done it, but from what I've heard, porting things to z/OS UNIX can be rather painful, due to its use of EBCDIC, and being based on an older UNIX standard (UNIX 95) which means it is missing many newer APIs (for example openat and friends).

IBM has now added to z/OS the ability to run z/Linux Docker containers (a feature they call "zCX"), which run in a hypervisor built in to the OS. It is a lot easier to just run the software under Linux, which is all ASCII/UTF-8 and has pretty up-to-date APIs (even though few Linux distributions have formal UNIX certification, Linux generally implements all the standard UNIX APIs, except for obscure things with dubious value and little use). When it is just VMs on the same machine, network communication between two operating systems can be very fast.
I use Feather blades from Japan. I can get up to six shaves from a single two-sided blade.
Devils advicate: I know hating on manifest V3 is popular. I know especially content-blockers (which I myself enjoy!) face issues with the new permissions model.

That said, I've ported an above moderately complex extension from manifest V2 to V3 and found the experience quite OK.

* The permission model is more clearly defined.

* Background-workers instead of background-pages makes for a more consistent API. IMO background-pages were always weird.

* Usage of obsolete APIs which may have "suddenly" failed in V2, now actually immediately causes runtime-failures in V3, making sure you've get all of them upgraded.

* You need to be explicit when doing "dangerous" things like injecting scripts. There's nothing accidental about this. This clearly improves security.

* Time taken? Roughly one work-day.

* No functionality lost.

Right now, as a developer, my only complain about V3 for this extension... That I no longer can have a single, consistent codebase for the Chrome and Firefox-versions, because Firefox doesn't yet support V3 in their regular end-user builds. But once they do, that problem will be solved too.

And as an end-user, I really feel this security-model makes extensions which can operate within the V3-constraints more trustworthy than similar extensions implemented using V2.
> I'm sure people working at plants that make conventional explosives aren't exposed to such risks, not even close.

I'd expect the opposite tbh. More dangerous dust inhalation in the explosives plant.
It could also be that the technology to achieve FTL is just over a threshold where the civilization would be unrecognizable to us as humans.

We aren't far from such technology already. For instance imagine just a few generations of biotech and computational technology - it may already be enough for us to transform and evolve into some biomechanical hive that bears little resemblance to our current selves.

It could also be that once you are advanced enough, you transcend this physical universe. For example, the entire universe to a deep sea squid is cold dark water without much other life. They have no way to comprehend that there is so much more to reality. They just aren't capable of it. We are not special and also likely not able to detect or comprehend other levels of reality that would be more vast and interesting to advanced beings than simple FTL leaps around the galaxy. Perhaps they just aren't interested in our little ant hill the milky way.

The lack of imagination around what is possible and the supposed paradox posited by Fermi is disheartening.
More Simpsons prescience: I believe it is Lenny who observes, when Homer is running for the office of town garbage collection supremo, "Eh, Homer's a great nuclear safety technician, but I don't know if I trust him with my garbage".
I'm not much of a fan of livewire, although I've just played with it.

I prefer Unpoly, which I already know. Or inertia if I have to go full Js.
Software is what makes hardware useful. I see this with a lot of IOT companies I deal with. Great hardware but the software is often a mess and an afterthought. So, you end up with users of that hardware either having to write a lot of software themselves or being severely limited and restricted by the software that comes with the hardware.

Quantum computing is not going to be very useful until normal programmers can work with it. If you need a Ph. D. in theoretical physics to even understand what is happening, there are not going to be a lot of people that qualify. I don't see this happening very soon.

Right now quantum computing has three problems:

- few people even understand what it does and fewer are capable of explaining that in a sane way. Articles on this topics are using a lot of quantum computing cliches and bad analogies (cats in boxes, etc.) to make it seem like it's some kind of dark magic that will solve any problem trivially. It does not help that professional snake oil sellers like IBM are all over it either.

- Current hardware is not very practical, useful, or cheap. Not enough qubits to do much useful things, lots of issues related to error detection and mitigation, not scalable.

- The only quantum computer software that exists is essentially proofs of concept and research prototypes. Basically it shows that if we had a working quantum computer, we might be able to make it do some useful things. But nobody has gotten there just yet.
Yes VScode but fuck me it's still painful.
Well, works, but wifi (ac) has unpredictable latency, so it works for few minutes and then suddenly you get s 1s freeze - switched to ethernet.
give examples, I'm really not convinced.

If anything public sector industries are far far larger in terms of scale, so it's likely that 1 single public disaster trumps many private ones. However, private sector has shown time and time again that it can create huge issues, for example take the forever chemicals inside you right now that you didn't consent to having inside you.

I want to believe private and corporate is better. It's hard for me.
The origin of both words is Latin, but they only sound similar in English. The a/e has a clear phonic difference in Latin which clears the confusion
> For 1-4, we will mostly set that aside for now.

Hmm...

> most people find it obviously true

Reminds me of the rental manager at my London flat justifying a raise in my rent with "well, rents are rising". When I confronted him with his own organisation's web site, which unambiguously said that rents were flat or falling, he countered with "Statistics aside, rents are rising".

But I see the problem. Previously you claimed that these things actually were true. That people may believe they are "obviously" true is an entirely different matter, and probably the crux of the problem.

Because people believe in false things as "obviously true" all the time. For example, people used to believe that the sun obviously revolves around the earth, and many still do (and our language certainly still does: sunrise, sunset etc.)

And these things are just as false.

> that now acting like there are no identities is just another form of identity politics.

No it's not, and that's also a false dichotomy. Repudiating identity politics does not require claiming that (or acting like) there are no identities. But group identities don't define us, and certainly not to the exclusion of everything else. I am an individual first, and a member of various groups second. This isn't hard.

> anti-racism is racist

Glad we agree.

> It is because white people tend to double down when confronted with anti-racist data.

That's both untrue and also even if it were true it would not mean that "anti-racism" is racist. "Anti-racism" is racist all by itself without any external help required.

> when whites are told that the legal system is unjust to blacks, they tend to support it more.

This is not true.

However, speaking of doubling down on the false (and inconsistent) things people believe: the same people who believe that blacks are discriminated against, and use the legal system bias to justify their belief, also fervently believe that males are privileged. Yet the bias against males in the criminal justice system has been shown to be 6x larger than the bias against blacks. When confronted with these facts, do they ever double down!

But thanks for clarifying that what you are talking about is the not actual facts, but all the various false beliefs that people in fact do have.

My experience has been that it is better to base policy based on actual facts, not on things that feel truthy, though of course policy based on the latter is easier to sell.
Strapi is definitely a great choice: open-source, fully customizable, large community. Disclaimer: I'm one of its creators.

As for the front-end, Hugo is a good choice if you want to build a simple website. However, my recommendation would be to use a front-end framework like Next.js or Nuxt.js so you can benefit from the capabilities of React or Vue.js while having the advantages of both static and dynamic (through Server-Side Rendering).

You can find plenty of tutorials here: https://strapi.io/blog/categories/tutorials?type=v4
"Best practices" is cargo culting. You wanna talk about people that just 'do' no matter the risk, informed or not - well, blindly adhering to what someone else calls 'best practices' is just exactly that. And they're often bad practices.

Of course, that's situationally-dependent. If you've got the constructive and critical thinking bit, hopefully you're questioning those practices. If cowboys are thriving, there's a reason why. They may be wrong sometimes, but sometimes they might be right.
Learn from My Mistakes
You might have heard that you should not do any IT maintenance while drunk, but what they never tell you is – do not try to fix your computer while having a fever!
Institutions only need to protect the freedoms that their users care about.

For example, (many) Germans expect to be free to drink alcohol in public or eat Kinder Surprise. (Many) Americans expect to be free to shoot guns, but can live with bans on public drinking.
If there's two of you then you are even better off just always picking 1.

You either win, or tie, depending on your opponent's strategy. Your opponent can never win.

That seems extremely optimal.
Not sure about the other payment apps, but few financial services consider it a violation to use them to receive payments for services that "depict or appear to depict nudity", "depict [...] illegal drug use", "depict [...] hatred or discrimination of protected groups or individuals".

If PayPal is actually going to enforce this, it will obviously have to remove Netflix, Steam, any book store from their platform, since they run terribly afoul of most of the above.
Sure, but if any one of those corporate contributors could merge any change they wanted into the kernel they could likely get way more "metrics" gain, but they can't, because that's not the goal of the kernel team. The gains of one corporation are secondary to the gains of everyone.
Then don't leave
Assuming 0.1c travel, the galaxy can be covered in a million years already, which is way less than the lifetime of many species here on earth. But if you extend your argument to intergalactic travel, then you definitely have to start talking about billions of years. I generally think that this argument is the best one that FTL travel is impossible, because it would have increased the likelihood of non-human intelligent life close but outside of earth dramatically. Outside of course physics of the last 160 years being built on the fact that C is the fastest speed there is.
These two are very good beginner resources:

https://pythontutor.com/cpp.html

https://www.learn-cpp.org

The other resources are:

https://godbolt.org

https://root.cern/cling

More info about Cling is here: https://blog.llvm.org/posts/2020-11-30-interactive-cpp-with-...
maigret: command not found
Well, that is very easy. You just need to buy the latest Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 16GB (not to be confused with 12GB) with TSMC's 4N process, Micron G6X Memory, Base clock speed @ 2610 MHz for a consumption of 285W.
> So they just graphed the assumption as if it was data, rather than an assumption.

Many studies make an assumption and then explore the implications of that assumption. They are not claiming that democratic countries have accurate official GDP figures. They are simply saying: if democratic countries' GDP figures are accurate then the correlation factor between GDP and light output is X. If the correlation factor between GDP and light output is X for all countries (another assumption) then the discrepancy between expected GDP and official GDP is Y. That's all they are saying, they are not presenting made up data as facts.
> There were a couple of hundreds webpages in 1993.

The internet existed before there were websites. For example, there were thousands of newsgroups[1] in 1993, and my ISP provided access to them. There were also mailing list servers, public FTP servers, etc. Even if you were only trying to keep up with technical topics, there was too much content available for any person to keep up with, even then.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_newsgroup
Holy shit. I never made the connection with Otto Normalverbraucher. Thanks for making me click with this little piece of German trivia on the day German history was made! :)
Here you go:

https://cppbyexample.com/

https://hackingcpp.com/

https://www.learncpp.com/

https://github.com/AnthonyCalandra/modern-cpp-features

https://cppinsights.io/ it's a must so you can investigate what gets generated by templates behind the scenes.

http://eel.is/c++draft/ bookmark this, you will need it!

Enjoy!
That's insane. What happened in the 2000s? It's like people are just waking up from a bad hangover
Mandatory reminder that hydrogen as fuel for cars is an incredible waste of primary energy and will be for a long time.

A petrol car engine is inefficient due to constraints (small + no cooling source other than air).

An electric engine + battery is extremely efficient (the "downside" is you can't use the wasted energy to heat up the car in winter like an ICE).

An electric engine + hydrogen fuel tank brings back inefficiency, and you can't even reuse that wasted energy because most of this waste is electrolysis.