skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is the way.

People need to get over their mental view of "refueling" being a thing you do when your tank is almost empty and then you fill it to the brim.

It's perfectly workable to charge 50km of range while you're at the grocery store, maybe 100km while you're at work and another 100-150km overnight at home.

I've got a 230V/12A capable plug on my parking spot and I don't bother to plug in every night. A full charge would take around ~18 hours (10% to 100%), but my daily drives rarely take me under 50% and I don't charge to a 100% because the manufacturer recommendation is to keep the car at 80% unless you're going for a longer trip.

The only time I visit a fast charger is when I go see my family, who live a bit beyond my car's comfortable max range. I stop half way for 20 minutes to top up a bit from a 50kW charger (old car, slow charging =) ) and grab some food from the local shop while I'm at it. I don't need to charge to a 100% during the stop, 15-20% of charge is perfectly enough to get me to my destination - where I have a 230V/10A plug to charge overnight.
Your understanding may fit, actually. If the one-off hack is easy to add, it doesn't need refactoring to add it. Maybe ten or twenty one-off hacks can be added before anything gets difficult. It's only later that things become difficult and the code requires refactoring.

Or put another way. You are taking something that's difficult to add, and making it easier to add by giving up clean integration with the existing design (ie making it a hack). Maybe this means future cross cutting updates don't automatically work, or you don't get some functionality out of the box. But if you've decided that's acceptable, it lets you put off the extra effort to make something easy via extending the design. Until the cross cutting updates or extra functionality becomes needed too often :)
"destroy a good portion of the Earth."

For a value of "destroy" equal to "detectable increase in cancer risk" maybe.
That’s why these interviews are mostly useless imho. I do 15-30 minutes interviews in person myself when hiring to see if they understand anything and are creative and then just hire them for a trial month. Works a lot better, great results with that so far (30 years). But we are not Google (nor do we want to be), so we are not going through 1000s of applications.
No I am saying that even if RISC-V was strictly better than ARM Apple would have likely still chosen ARM for the M1 generation as it would be the simplest way to unify their ISAs across their devices.
The “medium” is the message
Other extensions would possibly list some benefits but also possible more problems?
I never did it and was mostly speaking but I was afraid a N months would make the amount of changes to clean too large. It would be nice to ask people in various companies how they pace it.
Are you claiming that we finally found a perfect and complete description of reality in modern physics?

This is such a glaring and huge blindspot in western scientific thought process - a blindness to the human element of the scientific process. As if "physics" is something that has been around forever and we just found it in perfect form like some ancient artifact in a cave, rather than the truth of the matter, which is that it is a human creation that is modified with time and is a complex communal phenomenon with many different facets and pieces that not everyone agrees upon. In fact many of the most fundamental elements of physics are under revision and without consensus.
Show HN: A Haskell Poker Site
> What’s wrong with a species of sentient house cats that just want to nap all day?

Nothing wrong with that, but if life is common, you’d need all life to be like that to explain the Fermi paradox, which seems unlikely.
> this is so not news

I originally read about this in the Potemkin Village Gazette :)
I care and wasn't already there. I went from Firefox to Brave after the mobile extensions fiasco but, now, I'm coming back to Firefox because of v3 (Brave said they will not block v2, but due to the fact that they don't have their own store, you are forced to do installs from zip files, without auto update, which sucks).
I wonder why they didn't travel further to dump it. The ocean in particular was a popular dumping ground in Europe after world war 2 for anything toxic related to the war. Old warships was loaded to max and intentionally moved and then sunk in an undocumented regions in order to make sure that no one could recover it.
In California, a good chunk of that $300k is taxed at nearly 50%. Anyone who did not sell vested RSUs between 2020 and today likely has a negative delta, and paid taxes at peak prices.

It's still a lot of money, but it's not as much as you think it is, since it's not just pure salary. Even if it was, odds are it would still be taxed significantly, because most high-paying SWE jobs are in California or New York. California has 7x SWEs as Washington, which I would consider a better state in terms of how much overall compensation you can keep after taxes. It's better, but there's just less jobs in comparison.
>the long list of academic references originally posted may be of little practical value for most software developers.

Oh No! That is quite the wrong way of looking at it.

One of my favourite quotes (attributed to Mark Twain) goes: I have never let my schooling interfere with my education.

It is with that sentiment in mind that one should "read" the above list of papers. They contain the distilled essence of somebody's lifework. One does not have to read and understand completely every bit of what has been written in the paper. Indeed without the proper background, that might be quite difficult. But one should be able to browse and pick out the main ideas from the paper (this is what i try to do with all the papers/books that i read). Keywords/Jargons/Things-that-one-might-not-understand are filed away at the back of the mind so that later on when one comes across the same/related concept we can go "aha" and gain a deeper understanding of the subject matter. This is the essence of gathering and assimilating knowledge.
North Korea launders most of its money through US banks (billions) compared to tens of millions going through cryptocurrencies.

I worked very hard for many years and payed taxes legally and bought Bitcoin 100% legally through regulated exchanges so it's quite boring to me that money laundering comes up all the time. Most of the money that governments steal are made by tax abiding hard working citizens, not dictatorships that destroyed all their wealth.
Thanks for your comment. I learn a lot of lessons from Ray Dalio, an American billionaire investor and hedge fund manager, who has served as co-chief investment officer of the world's largest hedge fund, Bridgewater Associates. He said that an idea could reach saturation point in 5 years generally. Therefore, we have been preparing new ideas from a year ago. To be honest, we failed multiple times. We developed some apps and most of them failed but we always try new ideas. That's why we still keep current job so we are safe during upcoming severe recession. Also, i am moving to be a stock investor to be diversifying my portfolios. I am currently investing in real estate, software, stock and may be crypto currencies. I believe that diversification is a free lunch during crisis.
Yep, lots of words in these articles like: “could”, “eventually”, “if”, “possibly”. It’s honestly tiring to see these posted on social media. Show me the money or get lost.
A browser run by a rich homophobe who donates to homophobic political campaigns is not an alternative.
I really need to see videos of people doing these mythical 90 second gasoline fills on long road trips.

Do you practice it like you're at NASCAR or F1? How do you manage bathroom breaks? Bottles or catheters for everyone?
> Donald Duck got elected.

Hes a president with conservative backing. Thats always good for business.
Public investors may not be getting any benefit, because the private investors have already IPOd at a ridiculous stock price. Private investors usually have non-trading shares. The way the scheme works is that if they find the stock price to be right, they convert their non-trading shares into trading shares and profit more. This way the stock price doesn't increase much. They basically dilute the amount of public shares for profit.

They don't give any thought to public investors such as you and me.
File Server. HTML, FTP.

Website server.

SSH server for remote logins.

I refuse to use a third-party service for these items.
Thanks for your comment. Have a nice day
When I was watching the show I was wondering why they did not put a second probe right behind the first to observe the impact.

And when I went looking for more information about DART it turns out they did. the LICIACube. very cool.

So now the question is why was this not mentioned in the nasa show(perhaps I missed it) and why have I not heard anything about LICIACube from anywhere else(perhaps I missed this as well).

did LICIACube fail and every one is being quiet about it?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_Asteroid_Redirection_Te...
Impact of Different Coastal Defences on Flood Risk
Thomas Sowell explains how insurgent movements generally have a more just vision for the world in their early stages, and become tyrannical after they seize power.

He gives the example of the vision laid out by MLK in the 1960s ("judged by the content of their character, not the color of their skin"), and contrasts it with that of modern social justice types, and also compares Christianity when it was persecuted in the Roman Empire, to when it became the official religion of the Roman Empire.
There is a maneuver called 'notching' which is turning perpendicular to an incoming radar guided missile to try to make a doppler radar lose lock. Often used in conjunction with diving to the deck in order to force the missile to spend energy moving through higher density air.

But that doesn't require any vectored thrust, 'supermanouverability' or such. In fact, you should make the turn smooth to conserve energy.
I’m seeing that too. Results don’t match the artist at all. Also, the names at the top are alpha by firstname, and all the Japanese artists are bunched up at the bottom.
Is the title a reference to:
"Now witness the power of this fully armed and operational battle station" from Emperor Palpatine?
Nice foreshadowing, the battle station did not "go poof" in that scene, though, like singlefile-lite does, thanks to manifest v3.
Where exactly are you bringing these factually wrong facts of yours from?
> do people really just not care about their lives?

Nuclear in general is very over regulated and over safety conscious. This leads to many pointless or overly cautious rules, which slow things down and lead to people ignoring ALL the rules, including th important ones.
Over here it's a 2 hour timer you set up, most cars heat up from 0600-0800 or 0700 to 0900, depending on when people start off to work.
Alexa Guard???
What about all the languages that can simply use libsodium directly? I don't think having it in the std lib is really such a distinguished feat.
>> “ A mission critical user check needs to run (eg: does this user have enough money in their account to complete the transaction?)”

That info wouldn’t be in the session db row either.

>> “ A database write needs to occur to persist information (if this information is related to the user, it’s likely that the full user object must also be retrieved from the database”

This type of info doesn’t get updated frequently. Email, phone, name, etc, are pretty static. If they are just talking about a join using a userId, well that’s not gonna be any different whether you know the ID from a JWT or normal cookie.

>> “ The full user object must be pulled out of the cache / database so that the website can properly generate its dynamic page content”

But that’s an upside of keeping more than a cookie with an ID. You can just stash the stuff that doesn’t change much client side (keeping in mind the XSS risks). We certainly don’t pull the user’s email and name every page load even though it’s displayed on every page.

>> “ Almost every web framework loads the user on every incoming request. This includes frameworks like Django, Rails, Express.js”

That’s a framework issue and should be customizable. Not really a JWT vs cookie w/ ID topic

There’s plenty of reasons to choose an ID cookie vs a JWT but the many that the author gives are not among them.
Edge is also implementing MV3. Or did I read your comment wrong and you meant something else?
I do, I use an old (note to self: probably need to upgrade to a new) Raspberry pi 2B with headless Ubuntu server. For storage I use also an old 2.5 HDD. This system was one of the first I built for playing around with RPi. When updated & upgraded, it is a cheap and very easy solution. Even after so many years I still store stuff on it and use it on daily basis.
This was not what I expected when I started reading, but an interesting article nonetheless!

My first reaction is that the article is focusing on a rather specific (while generic) way of conceptualizing knowledge and skills, which are at best fuzzy attributes to start with. However, I don't feel that the specific framework and examples (including IAM roles) can be adopted well as-is; there's a lot of assumptions to the team and org structure surrounding this, along with processes leading up to defining the roles, which I fear can easily lead to cargo-culting.

My takeaway from the article is that it could act as input for teams to better understand their needs and roles, but to not act as a direct blueprint to be implemented :)
With just the money I save a gas+maintenance yearly our family can _fly_ to our yearly vacation spot (~1200km away) and rent the biggest fanciest Mercedes for the week. And we'll still have money left over.

And if you need to do a second trip that year? Or a third? Or 10 extra trips? The marginal utility of a cheaper EV starts looking really expensive. This is how people think. Owning a car that can cope with the outliers is a hedge against a period where you have to make lots of unexpected long trips.

People enjoy the freedom of ICE cars and their ability to go on essentially unplanned long journeys. Giving that up to use a cheaper EV will be a very hard sell.
PayPal are basically a law unto themselves.
Honest question: what are the service intervals like for the ICE part of plug-in hybrids?

Considering they are unused most of the time, I'd expect very infrequent maintenance, and even some parts switching from X years to lifetime.

Edit: a short Google search [1] shows that for actual cost, plug-in hybrids have the same cost per mile than EVs, which is half the cost of ICE cars. It makes sense to me because batteries are a lot smaller/cheaper, the ICE doesn't get used all that much, and there is regenerative braking.

[1] https://www.greencarreports.com/news/1129728_plug-in-hybrids...
Russian "Куб-бла" drones are silent, yes, but also inaccurate and have a significantly smaller payload compared to Iranian Shahed's. Also, both can't be mass produced due to a multitude of reasons.
I'll give them another try. I was just frustrated when I used them last.
> - People who play games are fiercely fanatic towards specific games/platforms (that the console wars still continue is very strange to me; preference sure, but the outright militant approach towards different platforms is just silly).

Well people who just care which console has MOAR FPS deserve what they get.

But as long as console exclusives still exist, there is an argument for a platform preference.
I'm from Sri Lanka and Nissan Leafs are everywhere. Even I used to drive one a while back. My brother still drives one.
Yes, a companies DNA can be quite an obstacle to survival in changing markets, but that sounds like a cheap excuse for bad management. The reality is rather: nothing stays forever. All technology markets are in a consistant change and you always have to adapt your company constantly, if you want to survive or even prosper.

One good exampel is Apple. They were a computer company which was doing well again after the return of Jobs. Then came the iPod. And revenue exploded. But when the rumors of a phone appeared, a lot of people would comment: no, they won't do that as that would eat into their cash cow iPod. But we know how this ended. They released the iPhone, grew multiple times the size the company was and eventually even stopped making iPods.

Back to Kodak: they did invent the digital camera, but at a time it was way too early for being a product. But more importantly, they did bring some important digital cameras to the market in the late 90ies, the first usuable DSLR were Nikon/Canon cameras equipped with Kodak guts. They started the professional digital camera market. Without Kodak, it might have happened years later.

And at that moment, when the writing for film was clearly on the wall and they actually had managed to kick start its killer, they dropped the ball. Good management would have seen that they could "protect" film sales only on a per-quarter basis, but it was a dying business. They should have used the billions of cash they still had, to gain a solid foothold in the digital camera business, perhaps even outright bought Nikon, which was limping for a while.

Or invest strongly in all the adjacencies of digital imaging, which they did far too late.
But even these current laws allow for non-euclidian space configurations and wormholes that leave the possiblity of quick trips around the galaxy.
Over 80% of apartment parking spots in Finland have had a power plug since the 80s. It's not that hard.

People just keep thinking that every car needs a 350kW fast charger on their parking spot, when a normal three phase plug would do just fine.

It's better for the battery to charge slowly anyway.
Learn how to send emails with PHP framework CodeIgniter including defining routes, creating the controller and view as well as testing the emails.
Something I think hasn’t been discussed much in these comments is what the alternative would look like, and why that is undesirable.

If you only perform the refactoring after making a change (eg. adding a ticket for cleanup later), then (a) you made it hard to do the change, but also (b) it’s now far less vital to perform the refactoring - as the desired outcome has already been reached.

Refactoring for refactorings sake can be hard to figure out what the goal or end-state is. Making a refactoring in order to facilitate a particular desired change acts as a great forcing function for helping you decide what to change and why.
Super. Thanks for posting! Nice stack. I shall be using some of you're picks I think. I really want to go back to Vietnam some day.
App script? Nice!

Let's say you weren't disabled, what job would you have/is best for a founder?

Myself, I personally think coders should code for work and for their startup, this way you develop higher quality code in both sides, which creates better outcomes, you're always in the software soup so to speak, or in the phó in this case.
Thanks jakobdabo, I asked the same question a couple months back but it didn't get any traction. :)

* nettime <https://nettime.org/info.html> -- discussing the intersections of art, technology, and politics

* SIMSOC <https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=simsoc> -- an academic list focused on social simulation, agent-based models, etc. There are loads more great academic lists on JISCmail as well :)

* ukdemocracyforum <https://lists.riseup.net/www/info/ukdemocracyforum> -- run by the UK Centre for Democracy, where the weekly UK Democracy Bulletin is also posted
I highly doubt that. WWII fighters didn't have the thrust/weight ratio or vectored thrust etc. to pull something like this off. Also due to the much lower thrust/weight ratio energy management was more important in WWII than in modern jets.
What surprises me is how they managed to make them artificially degrade anyway through terrible cooling. We could have truly eternal LEDs for only minor increase in material cost but no, they have to overheat and burn out to secure profits for Philips.
This is totally BS. Armed to the teeth security forces are slaughtering empty handed students and you say this is students vs students? I don't know what to say. Just wow
PV on car roofs is as useful as those powerbanks with solar cells on them. Unless you keep them in optimal sunlight 100% of the time, the amount of electricity generated is next to useless.

The only smart use I've seen of that was my old Prius that ran a fan using the panel on the roof if it noticed the indoor temp was higher than outdoor. Kept the car cool-ish when parking during the summer.
Congratulations, Michael, thank you for sharing your story!

A cautionary note on using Paypal as your sole payment system. If this is a considerable source of your income, I would caution against only using Paypal or keeping a large amount of money in that account. There are too many Paypal horror stories out there to mention of people getting their accounts limited or shut down without recourse because their automated checks flagged accounts for suspected fraud or violating their ToS. Best of luck!
Why is that "not a lot"? What would be "a lot"?
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/09/chromes-new-ad-block...

"Google says Manifest V3 is "one of the most significant shifts in the extensions platform since it launched a decade ago." The company claims that the more limited platform is meant to bring "enhancements in security, privacy, and performance.""

Big Tech is not exactly known for its honesty. If it does not also increase profits and/or decrease losses then there is no sense in pursuing it. There is literally nothing Google does that is not sold as being for the benefit of its data sources and ad targets, i.e., "users". Doing things that help lure in or retain the data sources and ad targets is not not the same as doing thing that actually benefit them. At best, what Google does is make compromises, but the announcements never acknowledge any compromise. Everything is a win for the data sources and ad targets. If we are to believe their rhetoric Google's interests and "users'" interests are always exactly the same. Impossible.

"Privacy groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) dispute this description and say that if Google really cared about the security of the extension store, it could just police the store more actively using actual humans instead of limiting the capabilities of all extensions."

As if anyone else, besides people obligated to support Google, would not "dispute this description". We do not know because those other people are never asked. None of them asked for an update. They have no choice in the matter. Ambivalence does equate to agreement.

It makes one wonder why does Google even bother to purportedly disclose the motivation or justification for an "update". No one has a choice to reject it. We never see any evaluations fo the source code changes. So-called "users" are not the stakeholders in this project.

"The EFF poked holes in most of Google's justifications for Manifest V3 changes, saying that malicious extensions are mostly interested in stealing data and that Manifest V3 only stops extensions from blocking data, not inspecting it, so Google isn't doing much to stop bad actors. The report says performance also isn't a valid excuse, citing a study showing that ad downloading and rendering degrades browser performance."

Tell us something we do not already know. Google's customers are not "users", they are advertisers. As such, statements about the advantages of an "update" really should relate to the advantanges for advertisers. Any other statements are just meant to lure in or retain the data sources and ad targets.
> I'm sick that you can't buy ("license") something on one platform and then immediately use it on another.

Except on Steam. Never buy your games on the app store. Get them on Steam and you get all platforms* (at least most of the time).

* PC platforms of course. Hell will freeze over before you also get the console version.