skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
PoE is definitely the way to go if you can.

Aside from immunity to radio signal jamming, there's no worrying about batteries/charging or ugly wall warts. You can also power your PoE switch from a UPS to survive power outages.

It's also vendor agnostic and fairly future proof. What I mean is while you might have lock-in with cameras/NVR today, you aren't locked in forever; worst case is you may be forced to replace everything but the wiring, but that's by far the hardest part to do in a finished house. The Cat5/6/7 will be useful for the foreseeable future.
Awesome! Let us know if you have nay feedback when you get a chance to dive deeper. Here's our slack community- https://signoz.io/slack
Rarely good amazon review:

https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-reviews/RPOEASRTW9330/ref...
They didn’t find any instances of cheating after August 2020. At that point his OTB ELO was only around 2450. It’s only after his last known instance of cheating that he improved into the truly great level.
For anyone not following this I'll save you some time with the TL;DR:

Hustler Casino livestreams a regular game with High Stakes Poker. A new player who is also a wealthy model wife type made a call against a pro that sucked out where her decision making was baffling. Off camera but on mic the pro demanded his money back. Then it blew up into a giant drama of accused cheating.

Here's my read on what happened: this woman is basically buying her way into being a poker celebrity, something many people have done before, some of them successfully in the long run. She's new the game, and pretty clearly not as sophisticated a player as the rest of that table, to put it mildly. This hand would be a very bizarre one to cheat in, as there were others with much more upside and that would trigger less suspicion. On the other hand, new players often combine both overconfidence with nervous panic, especially when say this is the biggest stream you've gotten onto yet with your plan.

So basically I think she just made a huge emotionally driven donkey call like you'd see at a drunken house game, then just said whatever she thought would sound smarter than "I did a donkey call." Then when this big figure in the poker world is giving her the death stare and then asking for his money back, she probably just wanted to put out the fire as quickly as possible.

This is by far the most parsimonious explanation.
I wonder if there are generalities about the products that "require" advertising and those that don't. Perhaps we would find that, on the balance, those products are not worth their externalized costs.
Whoever downvoted you didn’t get the joke.
In my opinion it definitely is zero. Word of mouth is more than enough to learn of good new things.
Wikipedia article links to the key websites, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_(standard)

I had less luck finding Matter with DuckDuckGo. Evidently a competitive search term (which is to be expected).
Yes. To defer to the prosecution’s arguments, however, it seems that Gary was charged with the following crimes:

- removal of property to prevent seizure (18 USC 2232)

- money laundering (18 USC 1956)

- obstruction of a criminal proceeding (18 USC 1512)

- lying to federal law enforcement agents

Also, the BTC were subject to forfeiture pending the resolution of the indictment against his brother.
Columnar DBs have been around since 1969, predate relational DBs. Seriously, if you're not into large scale data, it really isn't for you.
Consider GP's company may (at least in his opinion) make some kind of positive contribution to society, but wouldn't have the opportunity without using some advertising to get off the ground.
Given that most of the software I use consists very clearly of one-man passion projects where the author struggles to support themselves: nobody. (Remember OpenSSL?)
Admittedly I do not, I'm very much a homebody and tend to go to bed shortly after the sun sets. I bet those would be much more noticeable.
It took much longer than that for the AMD driver's to get to where they are today. Newer drivers get to piggyback off the work done for others (yay open source) but I think it will likely take longer than 5 years before NVK and friends are competitive with the proprietary driver.

I would love to be proven wrong though.
> Originally, Matter was supposed to handle enough elements of provisioning and functionality so users wouldn’t have to download an app. In most cases, users will still need to do so

I see that the surveillance capitalists got their way.
> The premise is you only need about 20-25 years of expenses saved up

What happens in 20-25 years, if you’re 35 now? Your net worth hits zero right when you turn 55-60, and have years left until you get social security? All so that you can live with zero luxuries for the best years of your life, and have no family to pass anything onto?

I’m sorry but it just seems like a huge misplacement of priorities to me, to forego so much potential to retire that early.

To me, the priority is the ability to simply say “fuck off” to my boss if I’ve had enough one day, and have enough saved up to absorb the mistake, if it turned out to be one. Having that fallback in the back of my mind means I’ve basically already won, I’m just racking up the score until that day comes. But until that day, there’s zero reason not to continue banking everything I have. Deciding “that’s probably enough, I should walk away now” at age 35 seems like one of the biggest mistakes you can make. 50? Maybe. 45? Maybe not. But 35? Huge mistake IMO.
They could have chosen to ban him for life when they caught him cheating. I would have no sympathy for him in that case.

But the document paints a different picture. He cheated, and they agreed to re-enable his account if he promised to not cheat again.

According to chess.com he kept his promise. So why the sudden new ban?

I would agree with you that the initial cheating was enough for lifetime ban. But chess.com decided against it at the time.

Reconsidering their decision 2 years later without new evidence, is kind of shitty.
Just how Putin is losing the war exactly? I'm curious to know since that's the only thing I hear since may. It seems that rather than making Russia back down, they are doubling down. This move is basically saying that we're entering a new phase: nuclear war.
Interesting differences in philosophy - the tea as the real gold vs Japanese emphasis on the ceremony vs British emphasis on the company vs Americans who drink coffee at Starbucks.
You are begging the question, in the logical fallacy sense. You have to advertise and promote because advertising has been allowed to grow unbounded like a cancer and drown out everything else. It's a tragedy of the commons.

If advertising were toned down a couple orders of magnitude, word of mouth might actually get more traction.
We did it in São Paulo, Brazil a long time (15 years?) ago. It was a relief and I'm always a bit bothered when I'm on cities that allow it. It might be the case that some places in some cities should still keep it, but otherwise I'm still all for it
No, no you don't.
At a gut level, I would love for outdoor advertising to be banned in my city. I resent the constant intrusion into my mind when I encounter them on the street.

That said, I do recognize that from the perspective of advertisers and consenting property owners having the (assumed) right to do trade however they wish, this may not be a fair or reasonable policy to enact. Truth be told, I haven't thought about this very much.

But the thing that I'm MOST interested in is what will be the secondary consequences of banning outdoor advertising? If advertisers cannot use billboards or posters, how will the space change and where will their behavior be compensated for elsewhere? Are there any unwanted secondary side-effects that might occur do to this prohibition? Like online advertising intensifying, or paid sponsorships for online content creators, or perhaps something completely different?
It's basically China's version of "free speech is dangerous". Whenever someone starts saying things the CCP doesn't like, they are "fomenting dissent".

What people don't get is if you want to start censoring "dangerous speech" then you'd better have a perfect definition of what dangerous speech is. But there isn't one.

So what ends up happening is you ban speech with good reason, set a precedent, then your political opponent takes power and starts banning speech as well.
https://wiki.lesswrong.com/wiki/Chesterton%27s_Fence

Edit to say - he was making a joke, this will help you understand
It's not nothing. In the affluent areas where passengers would potentially be willing to pay for air taxi service there aren't many large vacant lots left. So not impossible, but it's hard to see how the economics would work.

Medical transport helicopters have somewhat greater freedom to land in random places like roads and fields when necessary to pick up emergency patients. But that only works because police are on the ground to secure the area. And local residents don't complain about the noise from a single emergency flight. Those situations don't apply to air taxis.
PostgreSQL by itself is hard to put on the internet.

The pg_hba file goes out or it’s way to make it difficult to even connect locally easily.

Nevertheless you would do it so that your db server can be reached by the other machines.

Sigh.

I suppose not fire-walling everything would be someone’s own fault.

And not setting proper passwords.

And not turning on SSL.
So you're sitting on the fence ...
I commented elsewhere here on the video of a test flight. In that video they achieved that the aircraft flew like a normal plane with lift provided by its wings.

This mode of flight is said to be ten times more efficient than the helicopter mode during VTOL. That is: for each minute that they can cut from flying like a helicopter during starts and landing, they gain ten minutes of normal flight time.

I think the energy argument does not apply that much more than for other small electric aircraft.
were you root?
How representative is Aronian as an example of skill trajectories in chess?
Trying to think of an example in 'physical' sports (give me some rope here)... in baseball you start by using light aluminum bats, then in college they impose weight rules on non-wood bats, then in the MLB they impose weight rules on wood bats. However, pro players sometimes train with non-regulation bats to work on bat speed or for pregame warm up. Rarely, a training bat will accidentally get used during a game. If such a bat breaks during the game, it will reveal itself as a hollowed or corked bat. The consequences, esp with regard to public perception, for such mistakes are severe.

https://fanbuzz.com/mlb/sammy-sosa-corked-bat/
MAD is there for a reason, anyone who thinks that a nuclear attack within territory of a NATO country or forces within the areas that fall under Article 5 won’t trigger a nuclear response is kidding themselves.

And not only that eroding the threat of MAD makes the world a far dangerous place because it makes a first strike more likely.

That said even if the conflict goes nuclear there are different levels of escalation a targeted nuclear attack on say a military target would likely trigger a proportional response even if it’s a nuclear one.

And outside of NATO the US would very likely respond with a retaliatory nuclear strike against a nuclear strike on its forces where ever they might be.
Perhaps it should pick a better name :P
There could be per-unit CapEx costs that mean that you actually can't scale up to serve traffic very much faster than organic viral growth allows.

Imagine a small cake shop running a Superbowl ad. That'd be dumb, right? Even if they had the money to run the ad, they can't fulfill the number of orders that ad would generate.
Only in Ohio.
Donald Knuth cheque for sale for a constant on opeansea
Took a split sec to figure out
1415.926535 eth is pi constant!
> ... So while Matter makes it possible for Eve, a sensor and device company that historically only worked with Apple’s HomeKit ecosystem, to finally work on Android devices, it also means that Eve’s competitors can work with the same ecosystems ...

I'm struggling why this is a problem that we don't already mostly have, today. My smart speakers are Alexa devices[0]. I used to have a ridiculously complicated HomeAssistant setup that died when the server that the virtual was running on cratered. And yes, I'm missing some functionality that I had setup, but really -- I can program my thermostat, I can setup complicated routines for lights that are all different brands. When a person is detected on my front porch using my Wyze, my phone alerts me (wyze app), My echo dot notifies me that someone is on my porch, and I'm supposed to be able to make the Show display the feed (haven't bothered). I get that Matter brings to the table "they can talk to one another offline" -- that is a big deal -- my only issue is the idea that Matter introduces new market risks that don't already exist, today.

I buy the smart home product based on the specific need I'm trying to fill and whether or not it works with Alexa, which nearly everything does, so the only part of the ecosystem that I'm locked into is the Alexa side. I can, however, control my devices (a subset of features depending on what the vendor decided to expose) from my Echo Show, Alexa app and "talking to the lady". I say "Ziggy, Goodnight", my Belkin smart plug fires up, my two LIFX lights shut off, my Cree bulb shuts off. At 1:00 AM, my LG and Roku TVs shut off. I set this all up through Alexa routines, not the apps (which were needed to join the device to WiFi and pair with Alexa).

This post seemed more negative than it should be -- I'm not unhappy with Matter -- yes, it's got problems, but it's a good starting point toward "let me use the device from the manufacturer that makes the best one, not the one I'm stuck with because I use Amazon's ecosystem." Only time will tell if we see a myriad of devices that are Matter licensed which "interoperate with one another offline" but I'm hopeful.

[0] It's by accident ... I had a job that involved developing Alexa skills so it was helpful to work with one regularly; the kids liked them, so we bought more.
Weakening the army and making sure everyone below you is incompetent is actually a great way of preventing coups. Convincing your international competition to be incompetent is much more difficult!
You weren't doing the same thing, though it may have had the same effect. Template elements aren't part of the "main" DOM.
I need to see some real source on GDP bit. You realise this is the 5th largest economy in the world right now? If scamming Americans was that lucrative and easy then some country in South America or Mexico would be one of the larger economies in the world rather than India, because of cultural and geographic proximity. If scamming Americans was that easy, the largest source of the scams would be local. Also I don’t think economists account for the proceeds from criminal activities into GDP calculations. Even if it is in some way, crime GDP would definitely be underaccounted.

Also state support to criminal organisations would have been highlighted in intelligence reports by now and would be a major topic of diplomatic interactions. As the government is pretty incompetent it would be impossible to keep it a secret.

Your and the other dude’s assertions seem paranoid and irrational. You’re probably just a racist.
Sounds like parallel construction.
Canberra, Australia's capital, also does not allow (most) outdoor billboard advertising.

It's incredibly calming. And then it just becomes normal until you go to, say, Melbourne. And then it hits you in the face and good lord it's ugly.
Right, yes, I believe we're saying the same thing. If Coca Cola doesn't remind people to buy their product, they might buy some other product.
>It sounds like they don't really know where to make the cuts they want.

Metaverse. Nuke the entire thing from orbit. It's clearly the wrong thing for them to be focused on.
If he uses them then the other powers will need to severely hurt Russia directly otherwise they’d be encouraging Pakistan or India to exchange nukes, North Korea on the south or on Japan, or China on Taiwan or anyone. This would cause WWIII sooner or later so best to risk it sooner by punishing Russia to discourage the guarantee of it later. Basically, the use of nukes at all no matter what kind is a violation of MAD. If Putin wants to do that then we’d need to be back to thinking he’s suicidal, which we don’t. He wants us to give in so he can salami tactic his way into Poland, Moldova, and the Baltic states which would also lead to WWIII so we might as well keep helping the Ukrainians and steer down Putin back to the pre-2014 Russian border because if that doesn’t work then it’s WWIII anyway.
One of the nice things about traveling on the Autobahn is the dearth of billboards. Basically only PSAs about drink driving or wearing a seatbelt, which I think we could do without too (the signs, not the seatbelts).
EDC is critical
I swear Casio has a tighter tech geek brand than Apple. I discovered their pocket dictionary line a couple years ago and it practically made me drool.

https://www.casio.com/jp/exword/
I bet even in the HN population the number is still less than 10% for work. Including hobbyists, maybe 15%.
The life boats on the titanic were for kids and elderly first too. They said the same thing about COVID with masks and vaccines for the first 6-12 months.

It’s coming from an agency with messaging that significantly factors in priorities given limited supply.

Of course kids and old people
will be heavily preferenced in these guidelines. They always are. That doesn’t mean they should be valued the same way by individual citizens.

Anyone who cares enough, evaluated their own risks, and can afford to prep is obviously not starting from the same perspective of some generic recommendation going to hundreds of agencies across the country. You can argue risk levels but I doubt you could honestly dismiss the utility of personally supply for people in non-high risk groups.
Well there is now a massive group of people that never sees online advertising anymore. Due to adblockers and piholes. Thanks Raymond Hill <3

For me the only advertising I see is on billboards because I never watch live TV either (and haven't for years). And many products are way too niche to advertise that way.

This group will get ever larger because it's just a great thing to live in an advertising-free world. If your business can't cope with it I would suggest making that a priority to adjust to :)
You have to understand that most Americans are indoctrinated to believe that America is “the best” from the moment they are born. I have lived and worked in the US, Europe, and Australia and can truthfully say that you have won the lottery if you are born in any of the rich western democratic country. And I personally don’t put the US as #1 on that list.
I see what you did there.

https://fs.blog/chestertons-fence/
Chess.com explicitly states in the report that that sort of methodology does “not meet our standard” for cheating detection. If they don’t feel comfortable using it, I certainly don’t.
Always good to have a post with someone explaining to engage in illegal money laundering and thus indirectly explain the NFT, ICO, and 1/4 of the altcoin ecosystem.
> remotely swiping Bitcoin

In other words, he used his own private key to send a transaction. How is that "hacking"?
An Empirical Analysis of Racial Differences in Police Use of Force by Roland G. Fryer might support that. He concludes that oversight of gun use (by police officers) effectively removes the statistically significant racial bias that non-gun use of force has.
Because of the public uproar?

Happens all the time in all kinds of fields.
Zero, given that anyone can sniff the traffic.
When the retelling of the history of virtualisation ignored everything before Xen, I questioned the value of the essay.

When it got to asserting that Fossil isn't modern, I discarded it. Fossil's a DVCS, but unlike git it chooses to integrated project tooling for things like bug management with the code repo. You can argue about whether you like the approach. But 'not modern' is an absurd statement.
Only partly. In DOTA for example one of the more common cheats is scripting that provides the player with reaction time more like a pro in triggering items and abilities.
> “breaking away”

is a fictional movie. Please use factual references.

I'm thinking of my friends who didn't go to university, or got their GED at 16, and have struggled as their factory jobs went away.
I don't see how that makes it flag-worthy.
This would be really cool for a shirt or hat.
You have basically described part of the mandate of an independent review board/commission. Any civilised police force should have one.
The incentive to do what exactly? Break up a good marriage to get half of the common assets (minus many many expenses)? How is that better in any way?
Oh sweet, sweet memories of the rejoinder: “If plan A is to take multiple .308 rounds to the back, you need a plan B.”
It really depends on how far you are from the nearest blasts, and how big they were, and which way the winds are blowing. Even in a massive nuclear exchange, there will still be places in the United States hundreds of miles from the nearest blast. Those people could be fine if they take adequate protection from fallout, and if they can survive supply chain collapse and who knows how long of nuclear winter and poor agricultural output.
I was curious how this worked so I did some reading which I found interesting. In short, this uses ptrace, which is the same Linux kernel mechanism used by debuggers, to attach to a running process and manipulate the open file descriptors (amongst other things) while it runs. So basically it attaches to the process, and changes stdin (fd 0) and stdout (fd 1) to point to your tmux session stdout and stdin.

Pretty cool use of ptrace.
IMHO it's misleading and unhelpful to talk strictly about advertising. Instead we should be talking about marketing, for which advertising is one (hugely significant) part.

Marketing is a key component of building, growing and maintaining a business. There is no "build it and they will come". Many an interesting product has died on the vine because of poor or lacking marketing.

Marketing is a two-way street. It's about understanding who your potential customers are, how large your market is, who your competitors are, what is important to your potentiaal customers, who buys your products, why they buy them and so on. The other side, which includes advertising, is making people aware of your product or brand. It may include a direct call to action (eg "buy this widget now") or it may just be creating a perception for your brand. A lot of Coca-Cola and even Apple advertising falls into this category.

It's really disappointing to see some of the comments on this thread. Comments like "I built a business with no advertising so you don't need it either". The only way this is likely true is if you sell to a small number of businesses and your initial customers were former colleagues or otherwise known to you via networking. This is not representative of how business growth and marketing works and shouldn't be taken as such.

There can and should be limits on advertising. When, where, what, that sort of thing. I personally think that advertising in children's shows for example should be banned. So should pharmaceuticals (a uniquely US problem). Some things are understandably heavily restricted (eg gambling, alcohol, tobacco, cannabis).

But a ban on billboards? What does this achieve? The objections seem to be largely aesthetic. That seems highly performative.