skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Just above, you wrote:

>Ok, given the number of people that take Calculus, how many will ever read an ML paper? For that matter, how many even know or care what ML is?

..and now you, apparently without joking, assert that the physics info is different because it's necessary in rocket science, the one thing that is colloquially used to describe knowledge that normal people will never have to worry about?
> Just take it from Naomi. She wants to be a fitness influencer:

> That’s according to Olivia, who dropped out of college to make fitness videos on TikTok

> To quote the lovely Amelia, pictured below: You get what you pay for.

I think some people in here have busted irony/sarcasm meters, those are clearly ironic sentiments.

And another connection point the rest of the text is this:

> The current trend is pointing toward something darker, a large mass of under-educated, undertrained youth chasing easy money, not because they’re immature, but because other paths have shut down.

We're more and more turning into a culture of chasing easy money and the rise of everything from the "influencer" to meme stocks to phone scams.
I don’t know how common it is for hams to collect these but my father has thousands, so I’ll try to get him to send what he has your way
Also these players will think twice now about crossing chess-com's star players and stake-holders.
Here are a few things about i-bonds that the average joe may not know.

Series I bonds with issue dates prior to February 2003 became eligible for redemption six months from the issue date. Bonds with issue dates of February 2003 and later are eligible for redemption one year from the issue date.

However, if a bond is cashed within the first five years after its issue date, interest earned during the three months prior to cashing will be forfeited. Once a Series I bond is five years old, there is no interest penalty for redemption.

Another problem, you will owe federal tax on the I bond interest when you cash it in.

In general interest on treasury bonds is not taxable at the state level.
I am not sure about local taxes, which have all sorts of one off rules. But the thing most miss about the I bonds is you receive no interest until maturity/cashing it in. So no compound interest.

Hope that helps!
I have a USB to vga device that harmonics into the GPS spectrum, allowing me to broadcast false GPS chords.

It amazes me that most people overlook the ease at which their frontline defense can be thwarted.
Hans didn't make anything public until two stars made public allegations against him.
I feel more awake when fasting. I feel sluggish and hungry if I eat breakfast. It's not ridiculous to skip breakfast. How is that idiotic ? I have top health markers for my age and do a variety of different types of physical sports. I think the old adage (still popular among powerlifters and bodybuilders) to eat every 3-4 hours to be completely stupid. We never evolved like that, it's a luxury modernity that this is even an option.
However people are still people and I'd bet most people would still hire the degree holder to protect themselves. If the degree-holder was a dud, they can at least say they did "due diligence". It's like the old saying "nobody gets fired for buying IBM".
Open source development is not sustainable
It seems that donation based model is not sustainable for OSS. Even the latest report of Open Collective (https://blog.opencollective.com/12m-for-open-source/) suggests that an OSS projects are receiving just ~4k USD per project in a year on an average. This is below the min-wage of many countires if you look at it at a contributor level.

Isn't there any alternative possible? This seems like a huge opportunity if solved correctly.
Another thing I missed the memo for, 360 degree birds eye view cameras. Game changer for parking.
Location: USA, California, Foster City
Remote: Yes
Willing to relocate: Within region
Languages: Java, Javascript, Go, C, C++, SQL
Knowledge Areas: AWS, Messaging, Ad Exchanges, Network Management, Test Automation

Email: scott.conger at gmail dot com

Can provide resume/cv on request
https://www.linkedin.com/in/scott-conger-0934881ba/

"Full stack" software engineer with experience across a number of industries.

As far as I can tell, none of the people I've worked for have regretted hiring me in the decade and a half I've worked in software.
> You can claim "Well, we are/I am honest!" all you want, but the reality is nobody is a saint. Nobody. Full stop. If someone says they're a saint, they are lying out their ass. We have all cheated at something at some point in our lives, whether we got caught or not.

That's a total non-sequitur. Perhaps no-one is perfect (though frankly I doubt it), but that doesn't mean that cheating more means more success than cheating less.

Cheats definitely exist. But many of them end up doing worse than people who live more honestly, as we see here.
The breaker box is a last line of defence if things have gone wrong. Plugs designed for use in a bathroom will not short out if they get a bit damp, etc.
It’s something akin to a layer violation to have a database server running openssl and encrypting its own communication. It isn’t it’s business at all.
I feel like calculus in high school can be so easily motivated but isn't. For what a high schooler is concerned, you can use it to model the depreciation of mobile devices, cost per day of upgrading devices or how much you save each day by waiting to buy (assuming used market), estimated lifetime revenue for each piece of social media content, the same parametrized on subscribers at time of upload, estimated lifetime additional subscribers per piece of content, etc.
Don't support Epic and other stores that are hostile to Linux.
Some apps will alert you if a camera goes offline for a certain amount of time.
Right, because climate change didn't happen before capitalism in past. There is no climate changing on planets uninhabited by people...

Do you know a story about boy who cried wolf all the time? Good job activists, you done it.
I agree with much of what you said. I probably didn't convey my points clearly.

The victim clearly wasn't in a good position to shoot the cop even if he grabbed a gun. The cop would likely have had time to shoot, if necessary, if Daniel had pulled a gun. (Assuming the camera is the same perspective as his head).

There obviously wasn't an actual threat in this case but there was a perceived threat. The cop was there because Daniel was being reckless with a gun. I think that is the key reason why I am not sure there should be a conviction. Being reckless with a gun then reaching for your waist band / back when being told not to is clearly not a good thing to do.

I do think the cop is at fault for not giving clear directions, for contradicting his directions, etc. I'm not trying to victim blame or anything like that. I am saying I am not sure what the average person would do. You know he has a gun and he reached for the waist band. I think the average person would quite possibly shoot. I don't think the average person should be a cop just like I don't think this guy should be a cop.
Who are you to decide that though?

If you don't try to reach them - your inferior competitors will. Then you and your potential users are both worse off
He seems like a troll but it is curious that such a deal would go through this late in the election cycle, too late to affect races the way it could have in July.
I was about to ask "what does Kasparov say?" but decided to research it first. Very disappointing, but coming from him I'm not surprised. See below.

[1] https://www.chessdom.com/garry-kasparov-carlsens-behavior-wa...

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LaEipwGi0o

His Twitter feed is all Ukraine stuff, AFAICT. Maybe he's said something more than the above (?)

Personal story: I was the host at his Google talk in Mt. View in July 2017. I had to find a room for it, which was super-hard and getting worse all the time. I got a room that held 100 people, and I really didn't know how big a deal Kasparov was. I underestimated that, I guess, but remember that by 2017, Googlers could watch from their computers, so they didn't have to attend in person. I don't think he could have filled up Charlie's Cafe, which holds 450 (if it was even available).

Anyhow, he complained that the room was too small. Jerk.

(If you look this up on YouTube, you won't see me; they used his London talk instead.)
Were they always this expensive? I just looked at the prices and a simple digital watch is $180 and up
I'm not sure it's very good parallel construction. They say they only got the picture after subpoenaing data from his cloud account. So the police talking about this picture doesn't eliminate any public discussion of how the police got enough suspicion and evidence in order to get a subpoena in the first place.
> more data comes to light which suggests that earlier is better.

I have not seen studies like that. All the ones I’ve seen have participants stop eating 3 hours (minimum) before sleep. For example, With an 8 hour eating window and 10:00 sleep, that means eating between 11:00-7:00 giving you a 16 hour fast.
What you're saying is just not true. It's also not what capex means.

Most companies do not and cannot "go viral"

that is a fantasy for most offers. Unfortunately it's just not that easy

There's a reason that millions of Americans work in some form of sales. At big, medium, and small companies of all types. It's not an accident or a mistake actually. Any offer worth enough profit to be worth a human pitching it will get pitched - and so too will many offers that aren't worth pitching for that matter
Billionaire or not, what someone believes is entirely up to him.

After further research, there is no scientific proof nor studies that would demonstrate the effectiveness of this method.

I would not underestimate the placebo effect, but a method where the name is a trademark, and can only be taught by people part of the organization seems too fishy.

If it is so effective, why is it not part of psychology curriculums?
I was more thinking that cheaters would create a new account and play at a level that’s good but not uncommon like 1700 or 1800 and work their way up to GM status over a few years, careful to coincide their ascension with the historical pace, win rate, etc. of fellow GMs. That way there’s no anomalies in the data.
Yea definitely, 90% of the time it meant to be positive; just totally shocked by how badly engineered Juicero was.
Tesla's marketing budget is actually very small and even decreased last year.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000156459021...
Grammophone: A tool for analyzing and transforming context-free grammars
>It's simple, like all crypto newbies this prosecutor has just learned: Not your keys, not your coins.

The US government can throw your ass in prison for the rest of your life so yes, it is their coins. This is the basis of all government power and in a lot of cases, like this, it's good
At the time Shakespeare wrote there were maybe half a million literate people who spoke English. Today there are more literate people who speak English in Fort Worth, Texas. The only reason to think Shakespeare is anything but a middling writer of the winning English dialect is cultural snobbery.
Except, introducing the 15 minute broadcast delay just happens to coincide with Magnus scandalous withdrawal, Hans being especially carefully searched and being stared at by everyone (that is, if we trust how it was evaluated over a couple of games in the first place).

So, again, even though some statement from chess.com was expected, this one probably does more harm than good. Heavy implications, winking and chuckling, but nothing that would allow one to close the case (quite naturally). All of this historical progress evaluation was done by people a month ago already, and did achieve as much as this one. This one is "official" though, so pours another barrel of fuel into the fire.

That said, I wonder why 15 minute (or even more) delay isn't standard in events like that. Seems like the least you could do, given how questionable chess in 2022 is in the first place.
How is this not the kill-switch for bitcoin? Every bitcoin comes with the risk of having been in a wallet of a criminal. Since all transactions are kept forever, shouldn't every bitcoin be at risk of being seized?
Maybe not, but it is good enough. "Perfect is the enemy of good" is a phrase I like to keep in mind while programming or making something and can also apply here. Should we wait around for a perfect connector? Or is USB-C as close as we can get as of now?
A 1962 Ford truck would only have a single row. Without the Maverick's second row, you'd probably get a full-sized bed.
I'm not sure for what reason you are being down-voted, but I disagree with your comment on China.

Tarrifs on imported goods are specifically designed to make the cost of goods locally higher.

If a foreign product costs $100 landed, and a locally produced one $120,then adding 20% to the foreign one makes them both the higher price.

This is good news for those in local manufacturing, less-good news for the consumer.

Ultimately a tariff is paid by the consumer[1], and received by the local govt, it is thus really just a consumption tax of sorts, although one that is self imposed by the consumer. The alternative is to "not pay the tax" but instead spend the same money supporting local industry.

The US has had a policy over the last 6 years of adding new tariffs. (if they've been revoked in the last 2, I'm not aware.) This drives up local prices, which is a factor in (not the sole cause of) inflation.

[1] politically this was spun as "China pays the tariff" but this is obviously untrue. There is no incentive for them to do so, and even if they did, it would negate the point of the tariff in the first place, which is to raise local prices to make local businesses more compeditive.
Protein thermic effect is 30% so amount of calories equal to ~30% of that coming from protein is burned to digest protein. You're burning calories, not protein, to digest protein. Those calories are already stored and don't necessarily have to come from protein digestion.
Respectful disagree. Upstate and downstate are relative terms meaning "further from / closer to NYC than wherever I live", everywhere but Long Island (which is a separate category entirely.)
If you're at the point where these are options worth considering, then chances are the corporate culture has already gone to shit. The ideal solution in such a scenario would be to find a new job, but not all of us are spherical cows in frictionless regions of spacetime.
Shout out to Toyota making 200k miles the new 100k. The Toyotas I have owned have been over 150k with very little issue.
> "Khrushchev’s mistake". This is a Russian / Kremlin talking point.

> It'd be as if some Western official started defending Hitler's Lebensraum

If you were proposing a compromise Hitler would accept then saying the phrase "and this provides them the 'Lebensraum' he needs to save face..." would be reasonable. Proposing a compromise that would be an out for Putin does require offering him something that Russia wants. Fwiw many libs were talking off-ramps and such early in the war.

For the record, I think they should fight, but I can understand that other people disagree and think a brokered-peace is necessary.

> the minute you start spreading their propaganda, yeah... people are going to get pissed, ya know?

Well, "using their talking points". But that's fair.
This sense of ethics is literally going to ruin this country.
That's a solid plan: Dallas-Fort-Worth and/or Austin are notorious conservative bellwethers.
He can’t go a single day without drawing attention. It’s a real pattern of the ego driven.
I drink enough water yes.
Thank you! this looks solid--whereas I found Polya's "How to solve it" a pedantic and useless.

Best wishes.
Thinking more about this, my answer to "why learn calculus" is that so many ideas and tools of modern life are explained, and even relate to one another, through calculus. Without calculus, many simple things become unapproachable, or have to be approached by rote learning of formulas and rules.

When in grad school, a friend of mine taught a freshman course on modern history, and in the first week he introduced a general outline of calculus. The students were surprised, but he explained that calculus is a thread woven through modern history thanks to the importance of science and technology.
I would like to know too, I have been enjoying working with the OS and really like it for what it is, and also as a potential alternative to the Docker Devops hegemony

BSD in general seems like a potential pivot into embedded space too, there's a lot of interesting electronics out there that run it
Thank you! I feel like I'm going crazy here. IMO it's much more fun to watch humans teaming up with machines to compete in games of strategy, and given where we're headed in this world, these are exactly the kinds of games we should be encouraging. Building the tools to play games like this will give kids some serious skills required to tackle some of the hardest problems coming down the pipe in the next 10-20 years.
Having slightly more than average (researched the industry as an outsider) knowledge of industrial robotics. It turns out million dollar industrial robots are kind of like enterprise software. You "buy" an ERP/CRM/etc but it doesn't just work out of the box, theres weeks and months of work-hours needed to try and get it actually integrated into a company, and it still might not work since software has bugs, humans are fallible, and huge software with endless features sometimes forgets which ones still work properly in combination with others.

Industrial robots are kinda like this too. You can buy an arm based on physical specs like how large it is, how precise it is with certain weights of objects (because it may be less precise with larger objects), how quickly it can move around, how quickly it can get from precision point A to precision point B (because precision and speed are a tradeoff once weight is involved due to momentum), how much power it uses, is it hydraulically powered or electrically powered, available off the shelf end effectors provided by the manufacturer... etc.

Then you have to install it, as in mechanically bolt it to the ground (which might have issues with load cantilevering), mark safety areas humans cant be in when its operating (that could require redesigning the entire floor plan of a building depending on how much spare room there is around everything because people still have to get around to other important things when the robot is doing its job), then you have to program the robot (which can in some ways be simple xyz coordinate motion, but also you need to tie it into some form of process control software so it knows when to do its job, and other things around it know when to do theirs, and process control systems are software, and may not be compatible, or have bugs, etc), then you have to maintain it (spare parts, breakdown rates, warranty turnaround times, industrial equipment built to be used, is sometimes used to do things that will wear them out, but its at a known rate that was planned for, but is not lived up to, requiring replanning or additional costs)

Its a web of complexity that can lead to what seems simple "just buy a robot to lift this thing from here to there and then buy another robot to weld it to the car" ... into a project that takes piles of money, months of work-hours by multiple different disciplines from construction to programming, and anything going wrong dominos down the line making it take even longer and cost more...

I wouldn't hold failing to get industrial robots working against them. Feel free to continue holding all the other opinions though :) everyone is entitled to our opinions after all... i just had something relevant to say about the robots.
If you are relying on the cameras for deterrence though then even wiring them wouldn't help. The burglars or thieves would activate their jammer and then attack the house without realizing the jamming was ineffective.
Never said it was. History was (and continues to be) littered with terrible law.

If you want to argue that government shouldn't regulate billboards, fine, that's a valid argument. But the general principle of governments setting rules over private property is pretty well established, I would have thought.
> People have been noting for awhile how often law enforcement just leaves the "seized" coins in the original wallet

Do you have any source on that?
On top of being reliable, an array of electric motors in a control loop will be able to compensate for a loss of one or more motors. I imagine this thing could probably fly with a number of it's motors offline.
To reason with agility in a domain, one must have succinct language (verbal and symbolic) to express and manipulate ideas in that domain. Such domain-specific language facilitates both communication and understanding.

Symbolic mathematical notation was the breakthrough that most greatly increased the rate of mathematical breakthroughs thereafter.
This already happened. Tesla is one of the most liquid stocks in the world (check their volume and option chain), it didn't effect their stock price much
I mean Mark Twain said “History never repeats itself, but it does often rhyme".
Hopefully this will scare the market into centering more towards PoE video doorbells that support ONVIF. One can only wish... There are only just a few options now, and all are expensive.
Id love to listen to Knuth perform his instruments. Can this be found on youtube?
IIRC Ada Lovelace said about the difference engine that "the remnant may be construed as arithmetical or logical, depending as the supply is construed" which always struck me as a pretty succinct statement of the fundamental theorem of computer science
Elon Musk's Twitter deal back on
Uh, those are the reporter's words, not the prosecutor's.

If you read the indictment [1], the word "remotely" never appears, and it's pretty clear the prosecutors understand how Bitcoin works.

If anyone's clueless here, it's Gary Harmon, who showed up at his brother's court hearing, learned that the government had not yet secured the Bitcoin that it legally had a right to, then almost immediately moved that Bitcoin to other wallets, and... just figured nobody would notice?

[1] https://www.scribd.com/document/521749057/USA-v-Gary-Harmon-...
Money supply increases don’t necessarily lead to inflation. They only do when there’s more consumer spending on products.

In the recent low interest rate period, that didn’t really happen. Money instead went into an asset price bubble.

What we need to do to curb inflation is to lower consumption. The best point where to do that is the rich with their excessive consumption.
lit-html is great. I use it for a lot of projects whenever I need some simple tempted HTML. That being said, it seems like the v1 documentation for lit-html [1] has been removed in favor of a single page in the v2 documentation [2]. Is using lit-html standalone not recommended anymore? I really liked using it standalone.

[1] https://lit.dev/docs/v1/lit-html/introduction/
[2] https://lit.dev/docs/libraries/standalone-templates/
Where does this report state that the "removal of Hans' ban was controversial among chess.com's Fairplay staff?"
> It was overwhelmingly obvious that merely being well above average was completely irrelevant

I find this true for any semi-competitive endeavor that doesn't also have intrinsic extra benefits. You're going to hit the people who want it more than you and are willing to put in the practice time, and they're going to beat you.

Consequently, any competitive thing I do has to also have an extra dimension to it. A competitive sport is generally fine since I'm getting in better shape. I'm happy to do stuff like darts or bowling if it has a high social aspect to it. As long as I can be slightly above average and that's good enough and there is some extra benefit, I'm down with it.

Chess, sadly, generally fulfills none of those criteria.