skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I wouldn't suggest investing in short ETF or buy puts or anything like that if you don't know what you're doing and don't have to ask me about it.

In past tightening cycles the Fed has had to hold interest rates elevated for around a year before a recession set in. If that happens again then we may see a dead cat bounce over the 6-12 month time period and everything may recover. You could wind up shorting the market right at a medium term low. The fact that we're talking about doing that on HN could be a contrarian indicator that near term sentiment is way too pessimistic.

I do strongly believe that we're not anywhere near the bottom yet since inflation is being driven by wage growth and the Fed has announced that they're going to increase unemployment. With unemployment still so historically low this is not the time to buy yet either. The roller coaster ride is going to get a lot lower, I just don't know what the exact path it is going to take to get there or exactly when the ETA is, so I can't see there's any useful way to trade it.

You might be able to guess the correct path and just get lucky and have it work out, but you will be straight up gambling. You should know your exit strategy if you do that and understand what information coming in will make you abort your strategy if you recognize that reality isn't agreeing with your model in order to limit your losses.
You don't want mercenaries running your company.
Deploying multiple times a day doesn’t necessarily mean “slow to ship”. That’s just how fast your commits make it out. Actually shipping software is almost always not CI bottlenecked but slowed because of social problems.
None of those back up your assertions about the linked website, which has very clear information hierarchy. Category nav links at the top. Key topic links in a list and sublists (how's that for hierarchy?). The information hierarchy is easy to see and navigate, much unlike modern websites which mislead the reader with a lot of irrelevant images and layouts.
I mean the odds of somebody coming up with a nuke that can be operated purely on non-compulsory commercial power rates are slim to none. No one has ever even tried. Everyone promoting SMR relies heavily on continued massive subsidy to make it seem viable.
You want Tilt5 then.
Thanks, I didn't know that. I wonder what my options are then :(
> Death provides a natural mechanism to reset wealth and power.

Have you heard of inheritance?
Based on my experiences trying to get Windows stuff working through WINE/Lutris/Proton on my Arch Linux laptop/desktop, I'm guessing that a huge part of why they're able to make the SteamDeck a good experience is being able to guarantee that all the software they've written to help with compatibility is tested on their exact hardware. It took me a full weekend of tinkering to get ray tracing to work on both my desktop (which uses an AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT) and my laptop (with a mobile 3070); even after getting Lutris to use Proton Experimental that I downloaded through Steam, I still needed a smattering of different environmental variables (only some of which were the same for both AMD and nvidia) along with a newer version of mesa (for DXR 1.1) that's available even in the Arch, which have a reputation for bleeding edge stuff (although since then it's been put into their testing repos, so hopefully it will get pushed out soon). Even after finally getting the configuration so that the GPUs successfully reported the ability to do ray tracing, it took some specific configuration of the WINE prefix itself to be able to get certain games to allow the setting to even be enabled; apparently the Windows 10 prefix that WINE created had its registry initialized with inconsistent values for the OS patch build number it would report to software and the human-readable version of the string, both of which were old enough that the games didn't believe that ray tracing was actually supported, so I had to update them both to the corresponding values for a new enough Windows 10 patch before I could even enable the ray tracing settings.

Long story short, I have to imagine that even if someone managed to make custom hardware that was powerful enough to run the games they wanted, trying to just install the custom Linux distro that SteamOS uses would not just magically run arbitrary Windows games well. This really seems like something where the hardware and software have to be designed and tested in tandem to be able to have any level of confidence in a good user experience.
Cloning a Rare ISA Card to Use a Rare CD Drive [video]
I’m not convinced that taking VC money is even a winner if you’re actually trying to build a business because everything becomes so much about either short term or growth at all costs.
I've been passively on the hunt for a task manager for a couple weeks now. It seems everything points to Todoist for me. I love the idea of org mode but it's too much for my use case and I think a mobile app would be pretty helpful for me, given how often I'm away from a computer. I don't use Apple products so Things 3 is out. Obsidian is an interesting knowledge management tool that I'm looking into separately but it would replace a different tool I currently use for a different purpose so it doesn't make sense to mix those right now. Bullet journalling kind of defeats the point because I want repeating tasks to be automated (e.g. remember to do laundry once a week,be ready to go grocery shopping every 2 weeks, etc).

The biggest issue is how I want to organize tasks. The way I see it, there are several categories of tasks that exist in my life sperated by frequency, due dates or lack thereof, and priority. It'd be nice to have them all in one place but still treated as somewhat separate. It's like the difference between "stop at the drug store some time this week", "look into this new web framework at some point when I get some down time", "take out the trash on Sundays", "journal every day", "file this report by the the of the month", "it'd be nice to pick up some new jeans at some point", etc. They should all be treated fundamentally differently but they all take up my time so I want them aggregated. Arguably it's even more important to aggregate the ones without deadlines because they're the most likely to be put off. I've been thinking about making my own solution but I haven't decided on the best way (or even a good way) to model it yet.

I'm not sure what I'm looking for by making this comment. I guess in part I'm curious if others have had similar experiences and what solution works well for them.
The field of bioethics would never pass an IRB.
On every terms of service document there is a clause that says "we can terminate our service to you unilaterally with no warning for any reason including no reason". It's basically the catch all exception handler of the legal world these corporations live in.
yes. current medical science is having issues treating simple thing with humans (paralysis or any thing related to it ). solving aging, may be in next 500 years.
Natbot – Drive a browser with GPT-3
You cannot buy one outright currently, but you can still reserve one on Steam and from the looks of it you'll most likely get it by December. The steam deck is pretty incredible and I have greatly enjoyed tinkering with it.

https://www.gamespot.com/articles/steam-deck-is-speeding-up-...
Maybe I'm out of the loop but is there any additional use case or function compared with such devices in say 1995?

More lightweight, sure, higher pixel density, sure, but that's not a context that changes the offer.

In actual human computer relationship and function, it just feels like Myron Krueger's Videoplace from the 1980s is being perennially reinvented.

Please tell me how stupid and out of touch I am. I probably just don't get it
Is this even a question?
ask people how many things they will pay for life of their families.
> Google needs to get fucked, hopefully by competitors that eat their lunch

It's a cute thought, but how? If say, Amazon decided they wanted to use their AWS infrastructure to immediately start funding a more cost-effective, better version of YouTube, they still wouldn't have the monetization inroads or content catalog of YouTube. Twitch puts up a hell of a fight, but YouTube operates on another echelon.

IMO, the solution will be P2P on-demand streaming services, something akin to IPFS or BitTorrent. No other competitor should eat YouTube's lunch, because that just puts us back under the same wheel of censorship. Or (hint hint - this is most likely) nobody will care, and the status quo will continue to exploit millions of people for billions of dollars because Money Good!
> That's not random.

It's kind of random. There were plenty of competing languages in use until the 90s. Even our beloved Postgres used QUEL for its first decade of life. But Oracle took the dominant lead and its competition either disappeared or started adding SQL support to be compatible with it.

Had a different butterfly flapped its wings all those years ago, things could have turned out very different.

> SQL is basically math.

All programming languages are basically math.

> but the principles behind it are set theory

Thing is, one of the challenges with SQL is that it doesn't adhere to set theory. This leads to some unintuitive traps that could have been avoided had it carefully stuck to the relational algebra.

Such deviation may have been a reasonable tradeoff to help implementations, perhaps, but from a pure language perspective it does make it more terrible than it should have been.
It probably comes from 90% of discussion on SQL revolves around de-conflating the two. It’s pretty much impossible to complain about SQL without clarifying the difference, and even then. Really I think we should just permanently assume the other party has never conceived of such a difference, no matter how much they insist otherwise.

SQL is here to stay, if only because few can be convinced that another language could query the RDBMS directly (without first compiling down to SQL). Peolle also keep persisting in this belief it’s standardized, for god knows what reason
Even if this is the ninety's NIKKEI you just cut your losses and keep buying. The NIKKIE is up 200%+ since it's drop. There's always money to be made
Everybody interested in the topic should watch this video (it's just an animated graph, no music). You will get a better intuition for the lifetime of orbital debris, and the impact of various incidents, in a few minutes than in hours of reading.
I'll concede that the square footage seems an extravagance, and it ought not to be a thing, but once again, this is probably table stakes to rub shoulders with people who have power to change things. You don't invite investors to dinner at your down-town hovel
One of the first results on google scholar that came up when I checked into your claims is a recent study that contradicts everything you wrote here. (Since you never cited anything I won't either.)

At a minimum, this topic is more complicated than you think, and you aren't using the correct statistical terminology when you discuss it.
That URL reminds me of https://www.google.com/webhp?hl=xx-hacker
I don't think any of us do. Modern capitalism hasn't seen the US government abstain from promoting billionaire monopolies since before Rockefeller Steel.

On a more pragmatic note, the reason people use YouTube is because everything is there. Competitors like DailyMotion and Vimeo exist and do compete, their content libraries are pretty pathetic though, and the advertising situation is no better than YouTube.
Just because I might turn chicken in my old age doesn't mean that my death wouldn't be a benefit for most people.

There's one other way to "solve" overpopulation, and it's galactic conquest. Everything else we might do eventually devolves into nothing but shades of austerity and deprivation as we divide our planet up between more people.

That's not to say that technical progress won't mitigate that problem. And yet, as it mitigates it, we tend to just make more people...so it's not like we're manufacturing much more runway for ourselves as a species.
> It's because we've nationalized gambling[1], and so all gambling/contests need to be approved by the government.

What you're describing (the state has a monopoly on gambling) is applicable to many other jurisdictions in US/Canada that aren't excluded from the website.
They also have a list of restricted words for email addresses. For example, you can’t create a gmail address with Support in the name.
There's some data here that can help give a clue: https://survey.stackoverflow.co/2022/#most-popular-technolog.... It does look like vscode is the most used by a very large margin.
Identity and Access Management Workforce Planning
Thank you.

To add to that, I said nothing about storage. There is not much clarity about storage as yet. Pumped hydro, compressed air, thermal (hot rocks), hydrogen or ammonia: they could all be viable alongside batteries (for grid stabilization and short term storage). And more besides them, probably.

It's also not clear to me which battery chemistries will win for grid storage. Possibly several of them.

Storage is where the R&D action is.
No it isn’t. The DoH server is the final destination. It isn’t relaying your traffic to somewhere else.
I would guess the goal is to beat a world champion while playing black and get accused of cheating.
As the father of a 7 and 3 year old, I never understand the desire to shelter kids from swearing. Instead, I teach my kids that some words are swear words and are only to be used in certain circumstances. It has worked well for me so far.
Good luck with executing on your plan. May it reap all the benefits we need to shift us away from climate catastrophe.
Leadership usually doesn't care too much about those folks either.
It's also easy to say in hindsight too.

Were there plenty of times/chances to see the writing on the wall? Sure... but I really do think when you're in that deep, the money isn't really a factor, its the "life." Twitter ran Jack more than Jack ran Twitter.
Wow wish it could integrate with this:

https://filmot.com/

I'm constantly finding myself remembering a part of a video I saw a long time ago (e.g. Robert Sapolsky's hour-long lectures on human behavioral biology) and I've wasted more than a few days just trying to figure out which of his two dozen lectures it was. Filmot solved this for me, but I still have this problem with badly captioned videos or non-yt videos. This tool seems perfect for building a personal, searchable collection
"If I had more time, I would have written a shorter letter"
No wonder they call it ghostly.
There’s a lot of multitasking with kids which I don’t think is healthy for the mind. Also I never have quiet moments to reflect which is when I make connections, mentally piece things together etc.
I'm saying that if clinical immortality is possible and you're asking "ethical questions" about doing it, what you're actually providing cover for is "we shouldn't give it to the poor" - which is as morally bankrupt a position as it ever was.
You can still do reverse domain lookups using the IP address as well as see the domain in the SNI details.

So the content is safe but the sites you visit are still exposed unlike with a vpn.
Science is a methodology of exploration and problem solving. It doesn't say anything.

"Problem solving says we could cure ageing."
Any alternatives?
Genuinely asking: What's the value prop of having the merge-commit in the history for you? Have you ever capitalized on it? And if so, could you share the command-line-fu that's helped you take advantage of having such a commit in your repo history?

I'm asking because I used to do exactly this and feel much the same way as you — I felt it was nice to preserve the historical context.

At some point, it dawned on me that, amidst all the anecdata I'd acquired, I'd never once benefited from having those commits cluttering up the history.

These days, I usually advocate "squash & merge" for the 80%+ of teams that lack the discipline to write good commit messages for every one of their branch commits. And, for those rare teams where every engineer writes thoughtful commit messages on their branches (a true delight!), I savor being able to do "git rebase && git merge --ff".

Either way, we end up with a lovely linear history of (hopefully) atomic commits.
s/textually/sexually

i giggled :)
Are you maybe getting the Steam Deck confused with the now-discontinued Steam Link?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steam_Link

https://help.steampowered.com/en/faqs/view/6424-467a-31d9-c6...

If you do want a Steam Deck, you can get one in Canada: https://www.steamdeck.com/en/
Move along citizen.
Windows: Kerberos RC4 MD4 Encryption Downgrade EoP
A long time ago, I worked at a place which was an IBM partner (for other reasons), and I went to an iSeries training session. The user interface on these things is really ugly, didn't seem like it would be 'fun' to play around with. The interesting part was probably more the programming model.

They also said there were more iSeries in Salt Lake City than the SF Bay Area, which was HP & Sun's backyard.
Of course, there now is a business opportunity to make style obfuscating AI transformers ...
At our company, we rely a lot on https://github.com/boost-ext/sml
I'm betting that a perfectly linear git history is probably easier/nicer to have for people who think of git as a sequence of deltas.

That is not how git works, but I can understand the appeal. For all my personal projects I squash and merge everything.
Right. I physically broke into my high school to make a copy of the Commodore diskette station manual. We students had only access to PET casette tape readers. Cybercrime was not a thing yet.
> Do you understand the concept of competition under capitalism where the govt isn't forcing a single entity to the top?

The point is that advertisers essentially decide what's permissible and what isn't. An alternative to youtube backed by advertisement from major brands would have to abide by the exact same model.
You're a braver man than me. I never ever touch children I don't know (as a man), doesn't matter how compelling the reason. I assume no matter how good my intentions I will be sued / police called / crucified. Doubly so if it is a child of the opposite sex.
I figure life extension is more feasible than Faster-Than-Light space ships. If you could live for, say, 10,000 years you could travel.
i do like the idea that it would, at least in theory, allow humans to become as powerful as corporations in the US (because humans, too, would be able to live forever, accumulate wealth and power, etc.).
Rats. No "sudo make me a sandwich"?
Totally, if you've tried both and vastly preferred one, it's a no brainer. :)
Haha you know I used to move from company to company looking for the one that would make my 60 hours a week pay off. Ultimately I cared about things that these companies did not.

My employers and I were much happier when I switched to 30 hour work weeks and went to grad school part time :P
Thank you for the succinct analysis. It makes me wonder if the PE firms that think of these deals are borderline sociopaths - caring a lot more about money then people. It ALMOST reads as a sophisticated scam.
Can i register my own .google domain name?
How is "retaliating against criticism" contradictory to free speech?

I could certainly argue with someone on HN but also say their banning is unjust (if I felt that it was).

This has been a "solved" issue for centuries.

https://quoteinvestigator.com/2015/06/01/defend-say/
Making people like forever would automatically incentivise people to solve a whole host of problems.

The young care more about the future because they worry how emerging problems may affect them, and death is distant and abstract. Whereas older people feel their mortality more concretely, and wonder how they extract as much in the time they have left.
Yes, because they could never migrate off of it to a more modern product :)))

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27692965

it is actually worse, they probably use a frankenstein mix of Notes, Exchange, Office365, and something else
> Public Wi-Fi in the world of HTTPS

Story time. Someone I know once got laid thanks to Facebook not encrypting their sessions

My university was still using basic ass unencrypted WiFi with some kind of terrible dns-hijack sign in to “auth”. This of course meant that everyone put their shiny MacBooks on essentially public wifi and logged in to social media in the clear in class.

Some enterprising chaps made a browser extension that made it trivial to snoop any open sessions and impersonate that session in a new tab.

Someone I know would do this during lecture and post to people’s social media as them saying they should pay attention in lecture. Possibly some other scandalous things were said. The hilarity that led from that stranger doing so led to the beautiful nerdy girl sitting behind this person noticing and daring them to post more. That became hanging out, parties, and as far as I know they got married and have kids now.

Literal people exist that wouldn’t otherwise because Facebook didn’t have HTTPS
Good tutorials are not free....example Cantril for AWS seems good
If he hadn't died they would have had to kill him. He and Stalin trusted each other enough to make a lasting, nuclear-free peace. The wheels were already in motion when they replaced Wallace with the haberdasher.
Warner Bros. Is Deleting Purchases of Their Digital Content Off Your Library
Obligatory link: https://nickbostrom.com/fable/dragon
My 2 cents. They would have demographic data from these videos which probably more younger audience. Maybe a threshold for what profanity can been heard. Potentially results in complaints from parents > less viewing time from kids > less revenue.
I was maybe being a little facetious.

The moral question isn't important as much as how it will play out in practice. i.e., it will be available to the highest bidders, at first, and from then on, the best life extension will be available to those with the most money. It's only a matter of time before that sways the majority against the wealthy minority, and then pragmatism may dictate some concession to not as wealthy people, lest heads roll. The option B is governance at a global level that mandates equal access, which is hardly realistic in today's political climate.
What I find interesting is the duality of YouTube criticism. On the one hand, YouTube should respect people's like and dislikes to a letter, but also at the same time YouTube pushes people into dark echo chamber rabbit holes by only giving them what they want.

On the the one hand they need to stop accidentally taking down innocent videos, but also need to take down bad videos faster.

People don't realize that all these issues are two sides of the same coin. They complain on each side separately and don't understand why optimizing for one messes up the other.
Been in review for a few days, hopefully approved by Apple soon. Already available on www.iboostup.com
Find the documentation on YouTube for that boundary and compare it to the video.
As a sesquipedalian, my writing is sesquipedalian.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/sesquipedalian
The terrifying thing is this is what we look like to the AI. It sees us as melty faced monsters.
Obviously not.

Anyway that efficiency will not be important.
Realtors Act as a Housing Cartel
Wine Scandal (1985)
Oh, the hours we could all save if we didn't spend so many hours reading about, trying, designing, and writing better todo apps. I'm sure somebody has an idea for a better kind of todo app that would help with this.
Oh my god. Alright that's enough internet for today I think
Schwab still uses citrix for their streetsmart edge trading app
Essays like this are dubious at best. As if anyone, any agency or government, could stop one or more billionaires if they chose to pursue immortality despite public opinion saying it's a bad idea. They will, they are, and if asked any elite wealth or world class power will say whatever is expected, despite what they are really doing.