skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I actually think this link helps: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1575233618170982400.html

All of the statements are small and almost have to be encapsulated to make sense. This robs a lot of nuance and background information that is assumed you would know, or you have to dig up (with little help from the Tweet), to appreciate most of the context. Without it, all I get from the tweet is "Intel Bad".

To take a couple of examples fromm the Tweet:

> Yes, Intel is shipping to Argonne now. Great. How much of it? All of it at once?

I have no context for this. Presumably Intel Argonna is an HPC, and I suppose it is late. Is it late by a year, 5 years, 10 years? Is it worse than something else? What am I supposed to make of it? I have to dig up a bunch of background info to understand what this means.

> But I do know the worst thing Intel could do—did do—this week: host a glittering event that heralded an era of sparkling, Moores Law defying technical progress that for people in the HPC camp found *painfully tone deaf.*

Ok...what event? Could you please name it?

3 tweets later...

> This year at the annual Supercomputing Conference

Ok....maybe looking "annual Supercomputing Conference" will find something, (which it does). But There is nothing on "host a glittering event".

https://sc22.supercomputing.org/attend/schedule/

Nope.

I could go on...but you see my point (hopefully). So now I have a bunch of stuff (that I cannot easily verify) from someone I don't know, and presumably I am supposed to take it all at face value.

This person seems like they know what they are talking about, but considering the terrible Signal-to-Noise Ratio of Twitter, I am not going to accept anything on there at face value.
> Few people have (or want) a dedicated PC to use with their TV.

They have one though, so technical people shouldn't entertain the direct-to-consumer lie that smart TVs aren't crippled and locked-down general purpose computers.
I'll try to rephrase the question this article poses more briefly:

If the performance diversity between genders is big, but there is a similarly big performance diversity among individuals of the same gender, why not create divisions for people of different sizes rather than different genders? Weight classes in boxing and MMA are a positive example of this (besides those being divided by gender before weight).

As the article says,

> Why not create height divisions in basketball? Weight divisions in football? Why not segregate athletes based on bone density, testosterone levels, or lung capacity? Gender is too reductive a framework to reasonably classify physiology. Ask transgender and Paralympic athletes. Or look at Kenyan runners [...] if it was up to me I'd go ahead and create a division for people on steroids

Actually, sports fans just care about who is best at a given discipline that they can also identify with. There's more money in male brackets because there are more males sports fans and males prefer to watch other males compete. And yes, males perform better at many sports, this just contributes to the incentives.

Sports fans historically don't care that physiological categories are fair. It is reasonable to think that male/female categories in sports is a historical relic. It is also reasonable to think that the best competitors (often males) form the first category, and the largest group who are excluded form the second category (often females).

There are categories for people on steroids. In bodybuilding the steroid class is called "bodybuilding", where the non-steroid class is called "natural bodybuilding". In bicycling the steroid class is called "Tour de France". Performance enhancements will be controversial as long as transhumanism is a fringe philosophy.

Side note: I misread the title as "Women's sportswear has a crotch problem".

Women's sports don't have a crotch problem.

The western world has a gender problem.

Sports fans continue to watch sports.
You should look into swapping out the default google launcher. Which will remove the ads, remove all suggested content and declutter the main screen. Tons of videos out there showing how to do that on android tv.
Doesn't yet have a table or tree control - would only work for very basic UIs in this limited state. Also, GPL and all that entails (with rare exception that you can petition for a free license if a very small entity or open source).
I thought about your scenario, and there's a couple of things to consider. One, is the shipping capacity has still been reduced. The total amount of NG Russia can ship has been reduced. The other is it would be much more difficult to camouflage the sabotage of the Yamal pipeline, unlike the NS1 and NS2 pipelines which has the cover of the sea.
Have you tried MUBI? It takes a lot of the hassle out of finding quality arthouse films, there is a lot of good stuff on there.

Though I must admit that if I didn't have friends holding my hand through the minefield of modern cinema, I would also just stick to books.
Same, also flapping tarp in the wind. I go to great efforts to stop this happening.
What I want to see is a model that can generate 3D models for use in applications such as Blender. It would provide a good starting point for someone with talent to make beautiful. Or just save people like me time for making games.
This appears to be a rebranding (at nearly three times the price) of the Gakken Record Maker (which is still available online for its MSRP of ¥7,980 ($55) [1]). It even comes with a copy of the Gakken magazine! Here's a review of the Gakken record maker (which looks identical to the Teenage Engineering one) [2], the Japanese description from Gakken [3], and an English description from a reseller [4].

Gakken is a Japanese educational company. One of their products is a magazine called "Otona no Kagaku" (Adult Science) which comes with a kit to build a toy version of a mechanical or electronic device. Because they're part of a magazine, the kits are only available for a limited time. Here's some examples of the other issues' kits [5]. Some of the more notable ones are a wax cylinder recorder [6] and a gramophone kit [7].

[1] https://www.cdjapan.co.jp/product/NEOBK-2453544 https://www.amazon.co.jp/exec/obidos/ASIN/4057507221/gkp_shu... https://hon.gakken.jp/book/1575072200

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EB8qtW19nf4

[3] https://otonanokagaku.net/magazine/vol46/index.html

[4] https://www.turntablelab.com/products/gakken-easy-record-mak...

[5] https://otonanokagaku.net/ https://www.cdjapan.co.jp/series/2993 https://www.adafruit.com/category/269

[6] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9X2CS4cs8o

[7] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDdZFFLnsUo
> They really had no choice about that part.

Hello from Texas, where electricity providers are free to pass on absurdly-high energy prices to customers, regardless of whether those people can afford to eat or not.
They also got many black judges appointed at the state level in California.
Probably partially because you (like me) know SQL pretty well. I'm dealing now with an application at $currentjob whose employees are really, really good at Ruby on Rails' ActiveRecord, and the Rails/AR code they come up with seems to me INCREDIBLY complex, taking (I think) more lines than the equivalent SQL would. And not really any more readable. But they're very much into do it the Rails way because Rails says you should.

I think it's one reason that I'm leaving at the end of next week.
So appeasement then? Please show one example when cowering to the bully actually solved the issue.
Imagine using easily expendable and non-renewable resources, subjecting the very processes our civilization is sustained by to a great risk of failure while having an almost inexhaustible source of energy that was invented more than 50 years ago.

Surely that would be a madness and no reasonable organization would do this, right?
Seems to me that people are much more upset about this particular video (guy in circle for 100 days) because he's a husband and father. If it had been a young 20-something person, nobody would bat an eye.
yes, hiccup. small stuff is fine but when working with real apps and 100s of lines of html that make up pages... no thanks.
You will never have both, however, the "consumer can flash hardware" one guarantees a remedy to any malfeasant software. The other incents learned helplessness.
If the user's password isn't involved then what's the mechanism for invalidating existing tokens?
And this kind of thing already happens right now at my company. I can't do surveys at my company that want to collect demographic information because white woman 20s in engineering is enough to narrow down the responses to exactly two people. If I don't respond my voice won't be heard, if I do I risk retribution. Yayy...
One of the major benefits of ORMs was that you’d write a query once and it would work on any relational database or nosql data store. Imo it’s kind of pointless when an ORM only targets one specific database.

Your example is a bit disingenuous. A SQL query isn’t native in most programming languages, so you’re missing a lot more boilerplate code
Neural nets as an abstract concept don’t necessarily need to be built with atoms, just the substance of the external universe which may be far simpler.
Maybe this is part of the reason Goldman Sachs wants people back in the office…
China Targets the Global Fish Supply
It depends on your scale, but even at small scale, your central auth database is something that needs to be highly available because your whole system is down otherwise.

Obviously the situation is the same when managing a token blacklist if you truly have a hard requirement that sessions be instantly invalidated at a specific point, but there's a good chance you don't. Maybe it's OK to presume signed tokens are still good for some amount of time if your blacklist server is unreachable, or maybe waiting until the JWT expires after 60 minutes is too long, but a one or two minute delay is acceptable. Or maybe you only check the blacklist for high-risk API requests.

It's not ideal. Invalidation is definitely a weakness of JWTs, but there's still a lot of value in baseline statelessness.
Case in point, just compare the results of Stable Diffusion / Dall-E / midjourney to papers from 5-10 years ago (here's a random one I found http://proceedings.mlr.press/v48/reed16.pdf). Remarkable progress in that time, and as I understand it, a good amount (but certainly not all) of the improvement comes “free” from being able to scale up to more weights.
Yes. This is quite obviously the point.

Electrolysers are dirt cheap (and prospects of technologies with battery-like efficiency commercialising are pretty good). You still only get back 50% of your energy by burning, but if the energy from the lower capacity times is enough to fully fund your panels, then electrolysing the energy from 10-3 during spring till autumn allows the use of a resource you'd otherwise dump as heat.

Storage is hard, energy to power electrolysers is only cheap with solar or surplus wind, and the second stage of a ccgt is big and expensive.

This would solve one of those problems.

The other two are already cheaper than drilling a bunch of 20km deep holes or building a nuclear reactor.
lookup $NET
That's kind of the point - shift the burden back to the vendor and make the cost of pulling the rug from under their customers more expensive.

Or re-engineer their product delivery mechanisms such that the customer can retain the product. Which is the desired outcome.
Qualys [1][2] For testing SSL of publicly accessible sites. TestSSL.sh [3] for testing SSL of any site including private endpoints you can reach from your machine Only requires openssl and bash. SecurityHeaders [4] for testing what headers are missing from a website. URLScan [5] for diagnosing a websites behavior. bgp.he.net [6] for looking up information about an IP/AS Number/domain. Robtex [7] also for looking up information about IP/AS/domain as well as org mapping. WhatIsMyDNS [8] for checking DNS propagation re-run this 3 times as their probe timeouts are way too low. Old-school VirusTotal [9] for old browsers for scanning malware. WhoisDS [10] targeting newly registered domains. Mozilla TLS configuration tool [11] for setting up proper TLS/HTTPS configuration on Nginx, Apache, HAproxy, etc... Certificate Search [12] for cert transparency logs, certificate fingerprints and more. Thousand Eyes [13] free dashboard on a commercial site. DownDetector [14] for uptime of popular sites and services. EDNS Validator [15] for verification of your DNS EDNS support. Shodan [16] for looking up detected vulnerabilities of an IP. W3C Validator [17] for testing HTML/CSS.

[1] - https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/

[2] - https://dev.ssllabs.com/ssltest/

[3] - https://github.com/drwetter/testssl.sh

[4] - https://securityheaders.com/

[5] - https://urlscan.io/

[6] - https://bgp.he.net/

[7] - https://www.robtex.com/

[8] - https://www.whatsmydns.net/

[9] - https://www.virustotal.com/old-browsers/

[10] - https://www.whoisds.com/

[11] - https://ssl-config.mozilla.org/

[12] - https://crt.sh/

[13] - https://www.thousandeyes.com/outages/ [commercial site but priceless in my opinion]

[14] - https://downdetector.com/

[15] - https://ednscomp.isc.org/ednscomp?zone=ycombinator.com

[16] - https://www.shodan.io/

[17] - https://validator.w3.org/
They basically lost every PC except Tandy. I got to think someone was noticing the way things were moving.
The leap from "generating a frame" to "generating a video" is not as big as the leap from where we are now to a 'perfect' image synthesis engine(which would be required to get rid of artifacts).

The much more likely scenario IMO is that people get used to the artifacts and notice them less.
You can surely argue that it's not worth the cost in good faith, but there's no way you can describe an invasion and demands of territorial annexation as "reasonable" and still be taken seriously.
Hallelujah! I've been saying this for years and people looked at me like I was insane. JWTs are one of the biggest cult/hipster scams of the last few years.

GraphQL everywhere is another one (like JWTs, it has its uses but people went way overboard) and Tailwind is the next one.
Why not let the API Gateway check it?
A hacker statement (part of which matches one of the forum posts you quoted) was posted on the fastcompany.com site (https://web.archive.org/web/20220928010445/https://www.fastc...).

The post on the site itself, at least, must indeed have come from the hacker.

(Edited my comment with corrections)
small web as it does not require big software to interact.

Not small in traffic.
The way I see it is that session ids are handed out by the server as you login and revoked when you log out, so while it would be advisable for this session ids to be truly random there is no guarantee that this is the case. In truth I have seen sessions stored with an autoincrement id meaning that if you were to get a session id you could, in theory, just use the number before yours and highjack someone else's session.

A bearer token, in my experience, is a cryptographically generated random key (presumably unguessable) which the user can create, use and revoke at will.
Picsart launches Developer Fund valued at $1M
Creative platform Picsart is launching a developer fund valued at $1M to empower more developers to utilize the company's AI-powered creative APIs.

Up to 1000 developers will receive $1000 in API credits to integrate our tools into their platforms. Anyone can apply here - https://bit.ly/DeveloperFund
My first thought was actually that this was concerning EMP or radiological issues if Putin goes nuclear.
By becoming more opinionated.
Well all the newer HPC machines they built and we used are from AMD. They are incredible. Haven't been hearing about Intel for a while.
Yes, September 13, 2019.
> I look at these and see nothing but uncanny valley artifacts

Ok? It's a nascent technology. Look at the original DALL-E blog post from last year [1]. Now compare it to DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion.

[1]: https://openai.com/blog/dall-e/
AFAIK, QML is now their full strategy for desktop and mobile. QtWidgets is still supported but is considered somewhat legacy I believe. New projects are typically encouraged to use QML I think.
What's the Author's stake in the matter? Why does she seem angry at Intel, a private company? Why doesn't she apply there and do a better job herself?

Genuinely confused what this drama is about.
You'd turn off the second switch right before entering, so that the bulb associated with it would be hotter.
I don't know if FHE and ZKP are related, but it seems to me that privacy is a huge topic in web3 right now.
Glad I finally made my mark on civilization :D
So sad. Almost a million people in the UK living off less than £7k per year is surprising.
You know they already get probably 70% of your cities budget, right?
Need to look at that. Any other options on the “secret” menu?
>At a concert, I'm forced to close my phone, sit up, and pay attention

I'd love to know what concerts you're attending! I see phones everywhere, to the point where I am moving my head / shifting spots on floor (for example) to make sure I can watch the concert with my eyes instead of recording a video I'll soon forget.
How would you handle user authentication on a serverless platform? JWT are imo perfect for that since they are stateless.
Oh great, we can finally start fuzzing the human brain
I'm actually quite amassed that some developers are completely oblivious to the underpinnings of how their software works. Some of them really do feel source code runs on water vapour!

If you are genuinely having a break down because Heroku will stop being free and you haven't figured out that there are absolutely hundreds of other ways to achieve the "serverless feel"--which is basically near free as well, then there is no more hope left for humanity!
It's more about the Mapping than the querying. Luckily good ORMs let you fetch your objects using... SQL, which is a fine language for querying (doh):

for p in Person.objects.raw('SELECT * FROM myapp_person'):
print(p)
Why doesn't the same argument apply when looking at other services? Can't they still do a lot of damage in that 5-10 minutes against those services?
Check out the original simulation argument paper[0]. The issue is, if we think we are heading to a world in which we can do simulations, it becomes increasingly likely that we are in one of those (presumably very many) worlds, rather than in the one world that existed before the advent of such simulations.

[0] https://www.simulation-argument.com/simulation.pdf
It's my understanding that user's password + a server secret = the encryption key. Changing either one of those will invalidate the token.
Lance does have some wonderful videos with great insight, I just wish he'd edit them down. There's so so so much filler and tangents and fuss. They're like 20 minutes when they could be 10-15. Then again I respect that he's doing his own way instead of copying James' immaculate production with clean aesthetic, which it seems like quite a few people are doing in the coffee YouTube world.
It's because there is no reason to pay for something you can get for free. The YouTube premium value proposition is different.
"Explain" was the only possibility I came up with and was wondering how on earth OP got an autocomplete error to the word "steelman".

What a grossly unnecessary word.
The value add is you don't need a cryptographically secure session id generation mechanism when you work with JWTs.

A simple session ID can be (and often was) forged to grant access to things end users shouldn't have. Put the session id in the JWT and now an attacker can't easily change the session they are associated with.
The human hands on the animals are in the uncanny valley for sure. Pretty creepy stuff!
> Since when were session tokens ever a bottleneck?

JWT allows for a user to authnz with a third party trusted by the second party. An example of this is HL7 FHIR SMART app launch, where an outside web application (2nd party) is opened from within an electronic medical records system (3rd party).

http://hl7.org/fhir/smart-app-launch/index.html
There's no pricing indication other than "contact our sales", which is a common wording for "just as expensive (or even more) as the competition". Also their licence and subscription (yuck) model seems awful. Pay a monthly fee per device as long as I sell my product? No thanks. I got laughed at for presenting QT as a possible solution. This will just make me look like a tryhard clown.
It's enough memory for most applications that are not Electron.

Not to say that it should not have more, far from it. But the Electron framework is so wasteful, compared with basically all the alternatives.

I wish the framework developed for Sublime Text were not secret.
> Its text praising the divine virtues of the pharaoh Ptolemy V

Unfortunately, this article repeats this common half-truth. It neglects to mention the news that the text of the Rosetta Stone actually announces: general debt forgiveness.

If one reads past the Rosetta Stone's long-winded introduction about how royal and divine and legitimate Ptolemy V is, the text eventually gets to the point, which is an announcement of official acts:

>under his reign [and as regards the sums which were due to the royal house] from the people of Egypt, and likewise those [which were due] from every one who was in his august service, His Majesty remitted them altogether, howsoever great they were...

It goes on in detail. Of course, this act is intended to consolidate political power, but why tell any history if that's all we can say about it? It's not common knowledge that general debt amnesties were a common feature of ancient economic life, and this kind of writing is perhaps why. Reducing an official act to "propaganda" is often just a way to dismiss governance that one disagrees with.
My understanding is that many have supplemental power options, or at least the ability to be hooked up to a mobile one.
Recurring events will be supported in the future for full CRON like functionality, we wanted to start off with the simple one off events first :)
>I'm not sure I like it.

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that that is basically what it boils down to - the small web, and similar movements, just aren't for you. Because...

>This Small Web stuff (and other similar movements) is close enough to plausibility to capture people's time and attention, but far enough from reality to inevitably fail without making a dent in the awful state of the Web today.

... in spite of that point, the small web has always been around in one form or another. While the rest of contemporary culture glommed onto Web 2.0 and social media, there were just enough people keeping alive some of the ideals from the older web that have made their way into the more contemporary "small web" movements that you see today. There's always been an audience.

>Which indicates a kind of lack of high-level, systemic thinking that is absolutely essential if you want to change anything at scale.

But I don't see it (and this is just my view of the small web) as an attempt to completely wipe out the current, contemporary, "popular" web. "Scale" isn't the goal, and I'd argue that scaling is antithetical to the general ideal of a small web. It's about focusing on smaller, community-run spaces without all of the noise and bullshit. You have to resist scaling in order to keep that spirit.

To that end, the small web will always be there, for those who want it.
Mobile networks should of course be classified as critical infrastructure, and thus be exempt from any rolling blackouts.
Alzheimer's drug shows promise in early results of study
I don’t mind my TV being another computer, and the other computers I want to use with it are probably only my iPhone and Chromecast (incidentally also locked down general purpose ARM computers).

The last thing I would want even as a tech savvy person is to use a desktop or laptop with a TV in any way.