skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If it truly is a compromised site then the site owner needs to clean it up; but starting the sentence with "If.." doesn't make it so.

Alex Pinto's classic research into the (lack of) overlap among threat indicator feeds should be a shot across the bow; I worked with threat indicators for a decade. To fend off muppet thinking I would like to remind everybody that they're selling threat indicator feeds; nobody that I know of sells not-a-threat feeds. A false positive means a site was falsely reported as a threat [sp]; a false negative does not mean that it is good, it simply means it is omitted from the list of threats.

In my experience vendors are a lot more worred about false positives than dropping something which is a threat on the floor (false negatives in context). However, moral hazard pushes them to publish things which turn out to be false positives anyway, because at the end of the day they're selling FUD.

My network, my rules. Something doesn't have to be a threat for it to be blocked from a private network in my opinion; there are lots of reasons for that, including minimizing potential threats. Something could be hosted on stinky infrastructure, but it's unknown or hasn't been demonstrated to be a threat. Profiles for operational security vary, and so does the appetite for proactively blocking (and whitelisting necessary resources): just because it's legal doesn't mean it doesn't put me at a competitive disadvantage if people know what I'm doing. I have no problem with people sharing and discussing such indicators, but there has to be attribution to the sharer: they have a reputation to be considered with equal concern as that of the indicators they publish.

If you're going to do something public with such information, you can't point fingers at "AI" and indicators you found in a paper bag on the bus: you do that, then you own it. Saying the victim deserves it is something you'd better be prepared to defend in court.
Another honest question: is App Store SEO easier than Google SEO?
Automation does not remove jobs. It simplifies them, and makes them lower skill and thus lower wage jobs. A bank teller today is a terrible job making terrible wages. It has basically no career trajectory. There may be more of them, but they’re not the same job at all.

The number of tellers is expected to drop by 12% over the next decade while general jobs are expected to grow by 5% according to government forecasts btw.

Being a cashier used to be a tougher job because you needed to know all the inventory. Now it’s ok for a grocery store cashier to not know what parsley is.

If automation makes it practical to do an embarrassingly small task in order to provide a value to someone richer, yeah, you can be hired into it. Maybe a lot of people will. But that’s not prosperity that’s capitalism holding you by the balls.
From the full result links it looks like it's ubuntu 22.04 with just one kernel parameter added.

https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2209265-NE-ZEN4MITIG74

https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2209265-NE-ZEN4MITIG74&e...
Corporations have shown worse proclivities than the US government these days.
City Data Commons Against City Greenwashing
Yeah I don't see why one would try to reproduce the VSCode experience inside vim or whatever.

Vim or neovim inside tmux are really nice, though. You can just use the normal general-purpose linux ecosystem rather than learning an IDE.
I've tested the same video search from a twitter account in Portugal and confirm the same (zero) results.
My country lived through a dictatorship not long ago where someone in power decided what citizens could read or not, for "our own good" of course.

To whoever supports this censoring: please remember to remain consistent when these platforms start to shadowban you.
Vanilla JavaScript State Management and Rendering Framework
I just want to express why I sometimes prefer things that don't "just work". I love VSCode. I use (neo)vim just because I am used to them (started using them before VSCode was around).

Firstly, not "just work" means there will be no features to suddenly appear and "help" me. When I start to use a new IDE I never know what inserting "{" does: Will a "}" also appear? Will it start a new line? Will it cause indentation to change? Will it insert a whole snippet? How do I just insert a "{"? An IDE usually comes with lots of "helper" features like this, and questions like these add up. The result is that I never know what happens when I press a key and get agitated when the result isn't what I expect. If I set up everything myself this doesn't happen. (neo)vim is pretty bad in this sense actually. The default formatoptions and filetype indent plugins are pretty annoying, and the "J" normal mode command has behaviors that surprise users and cannot be turned off (you can remap it for sure), but by the time I met VSCode I got familiar enough with them already... I recall VSCode's default was pretty clean. IDEs are absolutely the worst.

Not "just work" also means that I know how to change something if it steps into my way, since I set up everything myself. If I have to edit a file with special formatting rules that I need to follow, I know where to change auto formatting rules. If I have to read some generated code or code from dependency libraries, I know where to turn off warnings from linting. Since rust-analyzer is set up by myself, if one day I find that its version or config is not compatible with this new project I am starting to work on, I know immediately how to change it. If my whole setting up effort is "clicking a button", it becomes harder for me to find where the change needs to be made. Such things are not just "if"s actually, but happen pretty often from my experience, often enough to make me think it's better to set up everything myself than to figure things out each time.
Though I agree with your judgment of what would be more fair, for me it doesn’t extend to compelling a private entity to enter into a contract with another private entity.
Burry is a hedge fund manager. The most important part of his job is to scare people away from the S&P and entice them to put money into his fund.

It's generally a mistake to trust the financial advice of any hedge fund manager, and they usually provide advice that makes the S&P seem like a bad bet.
You're right. An environment that's all text and generally uses fixed width fonts is not at all the proper place to run an editor for dealing text that is best understood by displaying it with fixed width fonts.
Nothing to do with the origin of their law then, interesting.
I’ve used a few of the Neovim GUIs; they each have a different take on UI/UX for a Neovim GUI.

I’ve been using VimR the longest, which is a Mac-native GUI for Neovim: https://github.com/qvacua/vimr
YouTube's Age Restriction Is Broken [Video]
If you are liquid, a good time to pick up some real estate will probably be in about a year's time.

Around 2008, a typical property dropped to half its value, then doubled and tripled in the next five-six years. Just buy it and rent it out on a time limited contract while you wait for the property rebound.
semaglutide has FDA approval as a weight loss drug and is quite effective
False, with heavy subsides ~70% of Frances electricity production for the power grid was nuclear but they exported a great deal of that nuclear power in non peak times such as nights and weekends to maintain even a 68% capacity factor. Further they imported a great deal of non nuclear power to cover their own peak demand. By comparison US reactors generally have over a 90% capacity factor which means generating ~30% more electricity from the same investment or in Frances case posting a ~30% premium on nuclear power.

It’s hard to work out exact figures but around 60% of the grid’s electricity used in France came from nuclear reactors. To illiterate the difficulty, recently most of France’s nuclear power plant where undergoing maintenance however due to low seasonal demand other power plants where able to make up the difference.

PS: To be really pedantic, total electricity production would include car alternators, home PV panels, diesel electric locomotive etc, but that’s yet another calculation.
No as in… you think “IoT” means gadgets with cloud connections?
Some of these are a bit nightmarish!

https://replicate.com/api/models/stability-ai/stable-diffusi...

https://replicate.com/api/models/stability-ai/stable-diffusi...

https://replicate.com/api/models/stability-ai/stable-diffusi...

https://replicate.com/api/models/stability-ai/stable-diffusi...

https://replicate.com/api/models/stability-ai/stable-diffusi...

I love it. But whoever entered "spider salad" and "cockroach salad" previously so it would show up when I searched for "salad" -- I'm mad at you.
Earnings and P/E in isolation are not good indicators. They should be at least discounted against the “risk-free” rate of return, which if you haven’t noticed is high relative to the past two decades with further increases to come.

What a needlessly condescending reply
Likewise, left leaning and i find it shocking. And as much as i want to not criticise the eu and its politics i simply can’t. Always sanctions and threats what happened to cooperation and mutual understanding?
A fully deployed 5G network will be able to support a much higher device density. Up to a million devices per sq km. Basically an antenna on every block and they will be able to connect every IoS device and scatter around a bunch of sensor, and still have some bandwidth left.
That “someone” includes 538 themselves. They’re very transparent about their track record and methodology.
I don't think debris 'going higher' isn't much of a problem. Whenever this happens the orbit is going to be more eccentric - meaning a lower periapsis, and consequentially lots of drag that will cause a rapid deorbit.

On the second point about parabolic orbits I also find that probably relatively low risk because we are only talking about a fraction of an orbit for a collision to occur so unless the debris field was massive the chance of another collision is probably still low. Remember when we are modelling orbit collisions normally we are often talking over 25+ years - 100,000 + orbits.

I think the main problem is busy orbits (e.g. sun-synchronous polar orbits at popular altitudes) where most of the debris remains roughly in the same orbit following an acute collision but has a lot of other potential collision targets. Also as satellites are disabled by a collision they lose the ability to avoid other objects already in the same crowded orbit - i.e. the fraction of objects able to take avoidance decreases increasing the chance that future collisions are from 2 incapacitated satellites, removing the possibility of avoidance.
Everyone (including non-solar customers) is getting moved to time-of-use billing with some sort of phase in schedule and I believe it's already required for new solar hookups. Part of CPUC's proposed replacement for NEM 2.0 combined fairly agressive TOU billing with moving credits for grid exports to an "avoided cost" model so that you get very little for exporting in mid-day when there's currently an excess of solar generation and much more in the late afternoon when there's a big mismatch between demand and renewable generation.

I think you can definitely argue about the specific values they chose, but the broad strokes make sense.
They probably find that they save money by making the process so onerous that more people don’t bother to file expense reports.
> It's like someone messed with your car tank and tires and the police stop you from driving it because it is unsafe to other drivers, they are not punishing you but protecting other people from being hurt by your property.

The police says why they stopped you though! Which implies what you have to change in order to be able to drive again. They will not say "you have to figure it out on your own or the guys who messed with your car would have it more easy."
Environmentalists have pretty much zero impact on the ability of nuclear plants to be started and demonstrate feasibility.

In the US, Georgia and South Carolina started building with nary a peep. France started building again without any environmental objections.

Yet these builds are all catastrophic failures, to the point that any other financial backer is scared away from even touching nuclear. The decision makers are those with the dollars to invest, not the environmentalists.
Perhaps both types of images ought be prohibited. Perhaps neither.

But, it’s worth realizing the two categories are different, and they are regulated differently (either legally or socially) for good reasons.

Sexual images have a propensity to make you horny.

Violent images do not have propensity to make you violent. At least not as acutely.
Depends on where you are, but 3G's being deprecated.
Or Putin calculated the near zero percent chance of restarting the pipeline and found it a worthwhile sacrifice in pursuit of a false flag to rally domestic support (of which he is sorely lacking).

False flags are Putin’s MO.
https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2012/11/22/finally-we-know-...

https://www.businessinsider.com/how-the-1999-russian-apartme...
Cross this with dalleee And should be super freaky
It costs a lot of hours to watch cctv footage. Tracking everyone who ever is on cctv footage without face/gait/whatever recognition is impossible.

We do want the police to do their jobs. We don't want them to be an intelligence apparatus.
> Combine this with the fact that the pay is shitty compared to other jobs in industry available and the incentives just aren’t there.

> Where do we find these highly motivated, fit, young, intelligent people to work like dogs?

We increase the pay. It's that simple.
The US government makes a steady stream of trillions of dollars appear in order to, among other things, build single use missiles for millions of dollars each and jets that have never seen real combat for billions each. The idea that any durable public work is somehow "too expensive" in the face of that is comically absurd.
Based on the quality of most of the recent programs and apps I have seen the cleaners could probably do a better job.
The ITU and IETF are very different. Although these are often lumped together as "Standards organisations" we should squint even at the word "Organisation" when it comes to the IETF.

The IETF isn't an organisation - like the ITU or a Boy Scouts troop - it's an Activity, like dancing. Humans can participate in the IETF if they want, corporations cannot (corporations also can't dance) and since it isn't an organisation the IETF has no members and writes documents reflecting the consensus of participants.

In this particular case an even more important difference is their approach to standardisation itself, the ITU produces "de jure" standards. The organisation produces documents which say how something shall be and that has the force of law. ITU members are sovereign entities, so they have police forces and armies, in principle they can choose to "enforce" the standards they've agreed, and only in practice do we end up relying on the fact that you might as well implement say I.762 as make up some other way to do it.

The IETF produces documents how participants agreed things ought to work, but sometimes that's how they really work ("de facto" standards) and sometimes it isn't. For example the IETF published a document about how early browsers wanted Cookies to work, which briefly mentions how Netscape Navigator's first implementation did it, assuming this will quickly be superseded. It wasn't, the IETF RFC about cookies is only really useful today as either an aspiration or because it obliquely documents what you actually need to do, mimic Netscape (and guess which shortcuts work and which do not).

The ISO and ITU approach works great where the main objective is to agree something and what it is exactly is secondary. For example the A-series paper standards from ISO are very nice, but if ISO had standardised what is now "US Letter" instead that would still be pretty useful even though it's an ugly shape without the nice properties of the A-series. However as you get into technical details this approach works much less and less well.

In contrast the IETF approach works better for these details, because of the objective of consensus rather than an insistence on democracy, it will usually identify when there actually just isn't any agreement and standardise only what's actually agreed - the cookies example I mentioned is an example where this didn't work, but it's not that common.

This has led to some conflict with "traditional" standards organisations which feel like they ought to just be able to write a document saying "No, it works like this" and have that take effect. Whether its ECMA, or the ITU, or even ISO this doesn't tend to go well for them but you can imagine it's frustrating even as they operate a liaison mechanism, to find that somehow the IETF is good at this while they can't comprehend how it even works.
The HomeAssistant project has pretty good docs on which devices use what class of communication e.g “local polling” should be the minimum for any device I get (regardless of whether I want to use it with HomeAssistant)
This Russian guy on RT doesn't seem very manipulated, more:

>on RT's show "Beautiful Russia," propagandist argues that Russia shouldn't worry about the way events like Bucha are being perceived or covered in the West. Instead, he says, Russia should lay into that: "Yes, that's how we are... We'll show you even more. Fear us!"

https://mobile.twitter.com/JuliaDavisNews/status/15712662228...

I think Patton may have had the right idea.
They provide much the same function as our muscles and tendons.

And in this case, I think it would be parallel to the shin and foot. The "thigh" would be the thing that has the name of the school, the knee would be where that meets up with the long orange bit, the ankle is the joint where the two bars meet, then foot, and toe.

Birds are weird. Or we're weird and birds are normal.
No worries, it's my job :-) I'm just so intrigued to see (well, guess, in this case) how the path of word of mouth works because most of the time it's a complete mystery!
Email jobs!
What a crazy idea. I have .com too :)
Very cheap for small amounts of data (~$2 per month for 5Mb), which is heaps for our purposes. For larger amounts of data, I have my doubts that helium is in any way viable, since you're piggy-backing someone's home internet, and the speeds are probably too low to transfer much anyway
Useful Forks
Before recently most GLP-1 agonists only gave a small amount of weight loss, and they've typically only been approved for type 2 management.

Mounjaro from Eli Lilly though shows great promise with an average weight loss of 50 pounds per participant. It's been approved for type 2 management, but they've also submitted it to the FDA as a weight loss drug.

On the first month on the lowest dose (no exercise), I lost 15 pounds.

The good side is the injection is mostly pain-free, and easy to administer. You will feel a little prick, but it feels mostly like getting a burr stuck to your skin.

The downside is it's $1000/month. Most insurance won't cover it yet. It also makes maybe more sense when insulin costs $5000/year or more. Right now there's a coupon which makes the co-pay $25 but that lasts for only 3 months.

Side effects for me were decreased appetite (which is a good thing), low level nausea, and constipation. All of which were not deal breakers for me.
I read the "warranty" part, thought "no way", but sure enough Enphase says in section 5 of their warranty: https://enphase.com/download/2022-04-30-enphaseenergy-microi...

>The Covered Products should be continuously connected to the internet during the warranty period, except where interrupted by causes outside of the Covered Owner’s reasonable control. This will help ensure that potential defects in the Product can be diagnosed remotely and that the Product can receive over-the-air firmware updates.

Interesting use of "should".
Oh yes. Some are very creepy / hilarious. Awesome just the same.
As central european I don’t see the problem to solve here. Getting to work (which is let’s day 100km away), typically there is a fast train to get there. If it doesn’t at least a regional train will get you to a hub. For the last mile you either have one more bus or companies offer shuttle bus. You can fill up TGVs or other high speed train efficiently, no TSA.

I would rather invest in short distance highspeed solution to simplify commuters living in suburbs and stop congesting cities.
Nate and team do modeling well. Fat tails, correlated populations, and they deal with the crap datasets they get from pollsters. I always tune into his podcast when an election rolls around.
More readable, non-diet link:

https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/30/europe/russia-ukraine-annexat...
Green-screen and DOS-era terminals don't work by having a custom shader running on a GPU, it's true, but they do have hardware that does the same thing Muratori's custom shader does: generate screen pixels by looking up texture data in a texture atlas indexed by a glyph index taken from a display buffer, which is updated by software. Consequently their display latency averages about 9 milliseconds.

Those character generators don't do rescaling and linear interpolation of the texels, and often they're only one-bit color, but that's extra work refterm is doing that DOS-era terminals weren't doing. It wasn't that Muratori invented a new, more efficient way to do things; he just reproduced the bitmap character-generator approach that was standard from 01975 to 01985, but runs it on faster hardware. So he got about 160 megabytes per second before optimizing, ten times faster than Windows Terminal, and 1600 megabytes per second after he "put in the most basic optimization [he] could think of".

It isn't necessary to do character generation on the GPU to be responsive, either. The Alto running Smalltalk took maybe a second for its ≈0.5 MIPS CPU to redraw a screenful of proportional text, say about 2kB. The original Macintosh took maybe 100 ms using a 1-MIPS CPU and hand-optimized assembly. But the laptop I'm typing this on is about 34000 MIPS so it ought to be able to do the job in ≈3 μs. My word-wrapped proportional-font experiment in http://canonical.org/~kragen/sw/dev3/propfont.c gets 72 MB/s, which works out to ≈30 μs per 2-kB "screenful". Valgrind says it's running about 113 instructions per byte rendered, suggesting my C is closer to Smalltalk performance than QuickDraw. It's still 20× as slow as refterm but it's not using the GPU, but 5× as fast as Windows Terminal. (On the other hand, it doesn't draw to the actual display, just a memory buffer which it outputs to a PNM file at the end.)

My own unoptimized monospace terminal emulator running on the CPU with a full-color font https://gitlab.com/kragen/bubbleos/-/blob/master/yeso/admu-s... takes 6.9 wallclock seconds and 3.1 CPU seconds to display the output of yes {1..90} | head -c 1000000. This is enormously slower, only 145 kilobytes per second or 323 kilobytes per CPU second, a whole 14 milliseconds per 2-kB screenful. (And its screen really is 2 kB.) This is 1000 times slower than refterm and 100 times slower than Windows Terminal, and it still doesn't handle the difficult cases like combining characters, double-width CJK characters, and RTL text. Probably I should optimize it!
I wasn't talking about regulation. EDF's relationship with the French government goes well beyond that.
Here’s a story about the FBI stealing $80 million after lying to a judge:

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-09-23/fbi-beve...