skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> My evidence is that the vast majority of Supreme Court decisions are either unanimous (when they don't represent an ideological issue) or along party lines (when they do).

I don't think that's a valid argument -- there are obviously differences in judicial philosophy that incline judges toward better apparent with one political faction or another, and non-unanimous rulings usually reflect different judicial philosophies.

> If they were really "applying their own idiosyncratic interpretations of the constitution", we would see a wider variety of votes.

No, you misunderstood. I was accusing those arguing that jurisprudence is politically motivated of looking at things through the lens of their own idiosyncratic interpretations of the constitution. We don't want the justices on the court doing this.

> I do not doubt that the vast majority of Citizens United discussions are of no merit -- that applies to practically every discussion. But you can find a scholarly disagreement in the decision of four Supreme Court members -- all of whom were nominated by the opposite political party.

No, I'm not claiming that discussions themselves have no merit, but rather that critiques of the ruling in public discourse are often based on factually incorrect assumptions about what the ruling involved.
A french court banning it will probably be a (short) precursor to an EU-wide ban which is effectively a worldwide ban. EU courts will be fining companies heavily if they don't comply which effectively means big tech no longer invests a penny in models.
I use 'French court' here mostly because I believe it most likely to be firstly litigated there.
The article seems to agree with your comment:

> "It [Enedis] said it was able to isolate sections of the network to supply priority customers, such as hospitals, key industrial installations and the military and that it was up to local authorities to add telecoms operators infrastructure to the list of priority customers."

This is also a good argument for mesh-networks between cell phones independent of cell towers, although those don't scale for large numbers connected phones and large numbers of users. Texting could be supported via such mesh-nets easily I imagine, but not video.
Aside from the fact that this is a rebrand effort and probably not TE's manufacturing, their mainline products have particularly high quality design.

I've been watching a lot of AvE[1] lately, and his BOLTR series features him breaking down hardware and talking about the manufacturing.

While Teenage Engineering wank is definitely not his category of analysis, it's probably not far off, considering he highlighted how spotty the Dyson product line is. I'd love to see him disassemble something like the OP-1.

Edit: Missing link reference.

[1]: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UChWv6Pn_zP0rI6lgGt3MyfA

Apparently, OP-1s use CNC'd solid block aluminum machining![2]

[2]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mqO7pVBxRQ
Uh, maybe include the text being reviewed in the results? It's weird to see all the comments and not necessarily have the text in front of you to see what it's talking about. Even better would be for each comment to somehow link to a spot in the text. There could be more than one "years" in line 1, and then how would you know which instance the comment is referring to?
> the GPU series seems to be April Fools joke taken too far.

I see; interesting.
I can see one massive advantage is that you could disable the db access/verification for service-to-service communication, since revoking an internal service token is exceptionally rare (and if it occurs, you have much bigger problems to worry about).
> In order to not have to care about rotating keys, a typical Resource Server would fetch the public key from the [authorization] server.

Another option would to be prepackage N public keys with the resource server during deployment. This means there is absolutely no network access required, just filesystem access to the public keys.

You want more than 1 so that you can rotate the signing keys if you need to, without redeploying said service.

What is the correct value for N? I dunno, depends, but it's not hard to generate 100 public/private keypairs and then bundle up the 100 public keys into a deployment artifact.

Is this as common as using JWKS? No, not in my experience. Is it possible? Absolutely.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.01540
Are all of you against blockchain tech (nfts, tokens)? really cool you can make a decentralized open world but closed minded about uses cases of tokens inside an open world is limiting.
Keep in mind that this article was written by Cornami, so i would take any assertions about cornami solving all the problems with a huge heaping of salt.
> It’s not as endemic as you make it out to be or there would be a public outcry.

It's a matter of time. Even if it's not endemic in the US (which I severely doubt) it's endemic elsewhere. Don't underestimate the public's ability to put up with things, especially if they are mostly kept in the dark about the most sinister effects.

> Banking and social media are also two very different industries. One is essential while the other is mainly bread and circus with a myriad of alternatives

Both are essential. Social media is what you make of it. It can be bread and circus, yes, but it is also an invaluable tool for communication. Losing access to them can stifle your communication efforts by a lot. Why, you may ask? Because network effect is in full swing: "Phone call? Who still does that? Just use messenger like a normal person". No one's gonna bother to call you or SMS you cause 1) you're not on messenger or whatever app they use and 2) can't be bothered to contact you at your preferred non-app way, when the whole friend group has a group chat from which every single interaction and update is broadcasted to everyone. In the end, keeping you in the loop is too much work, and then you start missing out on outings etc. And even if you somehow persuaded all of your friends to use alternative methods of communication, 99.999% of the planet just can't be bothered, especially when they have friends that are reachable over 5-6 different apps, one on each friend.

Don't underestimate the network effect.
Also technically they stole it from the French
This is a good overview, but I have yet to hear a compelling reason to use JWT.

String session tokens generated by a CSPRNG and stored in a cookie work fine for every use-case I can think of. What specifically is the argument for JWTs?
Both brown noise and shoegaze remind me a lot of the Safe and Sound Protocol by Porges. It's a therapeutic intervention designed to increase cues of safety by filtering common music into the range of human speech. The creator of the protocol has done some research demonstrating efficacy and come up with a plausible theory for why his protocol works[1]. Maybe his work could add color as to why shoegaze and brown noise is so impactful for some people? Not really sure, but seems related.

[1] https://www.emdrwestonsupermare.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/201...
Bad VIB(E)s P.1: Investigating Novel Malware Persistence Within ESXi Hypervisors
I thought I understood what you do but with your itemized example, I'm somewhat confused.

1. OK

2. Dev uses the `airplane` CLI as opposed to running `npm`, `python` etc locally?

3. Dev runs `airplane deploy` as opposed to deploying to Heroku?

I think it would be nicer for us if you explained your value proposition in terms of what tools/steps I'd be replacing if I choose to adopt Airplane.
Technically free and actually free are not the same thing.
Probably 0-based? I'd assume they'd come to the same reasoning as we did, that indexing into an offset starting at zero works better for addressing memory.
https://archive.ph/7ugqn
The site linked in the post list these as natural disasters
This would depend massively on the equally long evolutionary, cultural, and political history that they would have… just like that context is necessary to understand our own decisions. Folks assume “aliens” would be some kind of clean room, purely logical beings, but no such thing is possible and the assumption falls apart immediately.
You can't just take a random ZMA. With combinations, you're more likely to get a poorly bioavailable form, like L-threonate, oxide, or hydroxide.

You should be looking for citrate or glycinate.

PSA: 48% of people have magnesium deficiencies, the highest of any vitamin/mineral, I'm pretty sure.

https://examine.com/supplements/magnesium/#dosage-informatio...
Why a whole new ORM and not an SQLite adapter for an existing ORM?
Seeing `&amp;` on a page like Reuters is quite a throwback to the 1990s. There's actually something soothing about the imperfect exposing the "stroke" of the underlying media. :-)
The tech is very cool but this website fires all 10 cores at 100% in safari
I don’t know if it would have made a real difference in the end but in spite of some dissenting voices the news industry of the dot com era opened everything up and collectively decided they’d deal with the economics later.
Because cookies can be set to HttpOnly, making them inaccessible to JavaScript. They're also automatically included in all requests, so if you want to download a file that requires authentication, you don't have to do some convoluted JavaScript trickery to accomplish it. It can just be a regular link.

I feel like the people who bash JWTs have never actually built a real-life application using them. Yes, there are footguns. But they are dead-simple to mitigate, and they are far from the only footguns in the world of web applications.

Yes, you can't fully "log out" without a centralized database. But who cares? A JWT in an HttpOnly and Secure (requires HTTPS) cookie is very well locked-down. I'm not worried about an attacker being able to retrieve it, because if they can then the client is pretty well owned at that point and the attacker can do whatever they want.
Google is shutting down Stadia
I know where you're coming from. It was incredibly frustrating trying to learn how to code when the only options were "super zoomed in view of how to use this one tool in this one specific use case" or "Here's how to build an ungodly complex system that assumes you already have industry knowledge".

The thing that really made the info from the tutorials stick was having a goal in mind. For me, I saw Sentdex's self driving car in GTA:V (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ks4MPfMq8aQ) and knew that I just HAD to do something similar. In it he mentioned that I should have some OpenCV experience. Well I didn't have that, so I went to go learn how to program in python (the language he was using). It took me like a year and a half of casually learning how to program on the side, but I eventually got there because I had that single, easily definable, clear goal in mind the whole time.

I ran into similar problems as you from many teachers both online and off. The crux of the issue seems to be that many good programmers have forgotten just how much a beginner doesn't know, and just how much context needs to be given as to why certain design decisions are made.
Yes because banning alcohol, drugs, porn, prostitution and profanity in music sure got rid of them!
bluray encryption was never "cracked". even the above link is clear that it wasn't a crack. just that the encryption mechanism was well understood, but it requires a device key to generate the volume unique key (VUK) that is necessary to decode each individual disc. VUKs can't be revoked, but they are unique to each disc (pressing). device keys can, and when they are, they can't be used to generate a VUK any longer.

so one has 2 options, a database of VUKs that others generate (don't need a device key then) or getting a device to give up its key so that one can generate VUKs onesself. The problem with this is, that that key (if made public) will then be revoked itself.

i.e. I don't consider this being cracked, this is the encryption working exactly as designed.
Requiring fewer lines for Hello World doesn't really change that though.
If it's not clear that the compiler will infer the correct type, you can be specific. From the context, there's only one possible type though so that's redundant. Unlike C, older C++, or older Java, Rust expressions aren't necessarily fully typed in isolation. It's quite normal for a function to have an independently-generic return type and for the final type to be provided solely by context. Type inference only happens within named functions though: you need to specify your function signature.

Even if you find yourself wanting to know what the type actually is, the compiler (in its guise as a language server) can tell you that and let your IDE show you, rather than requiring you to type it out yourself.
>as population growth slows

This is only happening because more women are working. Guess what happens when all men and women are free all day long? It comes from the very essence of evolution that when the carrying capacity increases the population rises until it reaches the new one. Any "utopia" would revolve around sex as it is the principal object of human existence and reality.
A message about Stadia and our long term streaming strategy
Where the Rosetta stone would be if the British hadn't stolen it after the battle of Trafalgar.
Sigh. Let's address this persistent misinformation.

There are many ways to contribute to Clojure and its ecosystem: https://clojure.org/community/contributing -- and a PR or patch is often the smallest, simplest part of the process because there is a lot of other work involved in making any change while maintaining stability and performance.

Clojure core and Contrib libraries use Jira for collaboration (and GitHub for hosting source code). Anyone can post to https://ask.clojure.org (maintained by the Clojure core team) with suggestions about changes, enhancements, bugs, or even just general questions. The core team and the various Contrib library maintainers are quick to create Jira issues from posts there.

Once all the groundwork has been done on an issue and it is ready for a potential patch, you can get a Jira account approved (if you're a first-time contributor) and you can attach a patch to a ticket there. See https://clojure.org/dev/dev for information about the development process which emphasizes the groundwork necessary for a change to be considered. Many hundreds of people have gone through this process: https://clojure.org/dev/contributors

Anyone can sign up for the Clojurians Slack at http://clojurians.net -- Slack itself forces the "invite" machinery on us but that self-signup link is well-publicized and, like many OSS community Slacks, is maintained by a team of volunteer moderators. Clojurians is on a Pro plan so it has full history/searching available, sponsored by Slack itself (much appreciated by the thousands of Clojurians!).

Disclaimer: I've been a contributor for about a decade. I've contributed to Clojure itself (a small patch for one release) and I maintain five of the Contrib libraries, which all use Jira and patches as their workflow.
Are there any static analyzers that help with that or is it too dynamic?
One of the best ways to get people coding is to not tell them they're coding. Look at all the people who excel at Excel. I've seen some amazingly clever things done in Excel by people who claim to not be 'computer people'.
Sorry, maybe I reacted inappropriately. But I think we don't realize what a privilege reliable access to internet is, until it is taken away.
The United states government disagrees with you.
This trope needs to die. If you cannot understand ++x vs x++ then you fundamentally do not understand the language - or programming in the more general sense.

Let's stop stupifying our languages for beginners. Beginners are only beginners for a short while, and increasing verbosity with zero gain is annoying at best for everyone else.
And you don't need all this tech for a police state anyway. Police states have been around for a long long time. Doomsday worries about hypothetical uses of tech seem yeah very hypothetical. I agree we should fight govt encroachment on our rights, but if you do that with too paranoid of a lens, then we won't have nice things (USA 2022 in a nutshell). How about, let's fight govt oppression when/where they are actually oppressing us.
That's a logistical issue. The point of concern is that the person I was responding to said that merely wanting to live in a world where you are handed everything is childish. Why would wanting to be able to have access to everything you need for a happy life at 0 cost ever be childish?

We are all born worthy of a life free of struggle. If we can ever obtain that, we deserve it, regardless of how hard we worked for it. I don't understand this mindset of "you gotta _earn_ happiness/safety/security, etc."
Japan's Mitsubishi Heavy to develop safer nuclear reactor
Mithril (startup founded by HS students) Acquired by Commsor
Platforms not providing OAuth and the ability to delegate access to an appropriate sub-set of data and utility permission is nothing new.

Almost every major platform I can think of was slow to provide what it's innovation community wanted - I remember giving countless apps my Twitter or LinkedIn passwords in order to access 3rd party functionality and value. Blackberry/RIM held a frightening number of email address and passwords in order for the service to work.

But there's something very uncomfortable about surrendering my EV's credentials to the point that I just won't do it.

I bristle not only at giving away access to my current location but also where I'm going. I don't especially like the idea of Tesla having all this data but I'm certainly not comfortable with small startups having it.

In the event that security is compromised there's also too much opportunity for mass-griefing and inconveniencing - locking me out of my car, heating my car at the highest temperature (I won't go on, but you get the point).

My take is that the engineers at Tesla know how to build OAuth - they intentionally are not doing this because the company is not ready for this world or prepared to accept it - yet. By requiring you to give away the farm with your username and password it maintains a high stakes 'all or nothing' which I'm sure they hope will put off most of their customers.

Give it time, but once these companies do have petitioned permissioning I'm not sure what the value add will be for these startups like Telematica.
https://archive.ph/aIyLu
I think you missed that this whole discussion is in the context of deep learning, therefore your comment does not apply. It is 30x slower that 3090Ti for that purpose.
Ah, super cool — I did not know that!
Wow svix looks great and pretty awesome that it's open source thanks for sharing!
Real Artifacts – real phenomena that resemble computer graphics artifacts
Just for some perspective: In my entire life in Germany, I experienced two power outages, both more than 20 years ago. The grid is rock-solid here; this might not warrant for huge battery capacity in general (even though 30 minutes does seem quite small).
I wouldn't say he ruined the joke. The original saying quite obviously only covered the first two issues. The off-by-one error was only added later. Though it definitely did enhance the joke factor.

https://www.karlton.org/2017/12/naming-things-hard/
except there's no need for blockchain to do that, if it was desired, it could be done entirely by the IP owner (think owning ultraviolet / movies anywhere rights and being able to transfer them to another account).
Oh Dear 2.0 Launched
You're coming at it from a slightly wrong angle. You are completely right that for queries, there's really no gain, you just end up having to learn both SQL and whatever your ORMs DSL is.

Where ORMs are useful is once you have your objects. The usefulness of an ORM is being able to say:

user.email = 'new@example.com'
user.groups.append('admin')
user.save()

Also being able to work on your data in objects or structure native to your programming language means that you can leverage both the strengths of the language and the database server. Some operations are much simpler to do in Python or C#, compared to SQL. In other scenarios you really need to let the database do its thing. Again, you do have a point, because believing that you can skip learning SQL and just rely on the ORM will get you into trouble.

One other feature of ORMs is that they allow you to write code that will run on multiple databases, but at the cost of not being able to use the more advanced database features. For many CRUD applications that is a price worth paying though.
I'll bookmark this post, so handy with the post itself + links from comments,

my own grain of sand:

- https://funpay.com/en/ - Marketplace for gamers

- https://en.y2mate.is/58/ - Video downloader for youtube

- https://www.hagglezon.com/ - Compare amazon prices in Europe
Nobody has a monopoly on power generation, $30k can get you a self sufficient solar setup so obviously power companies should be allowed to create whatever conditions they want...... /s
I think you are mixing it up with order-preserving encryption and other stuff related to encrypted databases.

In the FHE model, the assumption usually is - you have some data, someone else does some encrypted calculations, you get the encrypted answer back, you decrypt the answer and read it. The adversary cannot play 20 questions because they only calculate the encrypted answers, they are not allowed to see what the answers are.
With no prior knowledge of these aliens, neither. Why is 0 more special than 1 in your head?
I think the opposite is true. I think we're closer to the beginning of a kind of arms race.
Yep, that's because GPT-3 was trained on real existing data, and it's quite a challenge to make sure the story plot is 100% fake. When it's too close from an existing film, it just sometimes gives it the same film title. I have in-between GPT-3 prompts to avoid that as much as possible, but sometimes real movie titles slips through the cracks. Something I hope to improve shortly.
Those are the most popular outspoken right wing identity politic beliefs that the government absolutely does not care about. They're plastered on 'news' networks and 'news' radio every single day and the FCC does not care.
They also apparently will stand up their own MV2 store after Google's deprecation is complete.

> During the deprecation period, we can keep this functionality via patch (since it's there for Enterprise). After V2 is pulled from store, we'll need to stand up our own extension store for manifest v2
> If you want to show someone "responsive content", that is a different use case.

No it's not! You create your content with text and images, you send it to two friends: one opens it in a 27" inch monitor, the other one on his mobile phone.
How big should the images be? How big the text? What happens if there is a text on the left and an images on the right, and you watch it on a mobile phone? should it go down, should the image resize to occupy at maximum half the viewport? what happens when the text overflows?

The reason you can do it on a Oowerpoint or Publisher is that the viewport is the same, you position it and you are done. The user on the desktop will see it very small, the user on the phone will need to keep scrolling and dragging.

If you are ok with these limitations, there are plenty of tools available to share content! You named them.

If you want better control, there are no easy way of doing it, there are no example of this problem being solved, and I don't think it's a web problem.
Thanks Larry for proving that US execs are just as amoral and dishonest as any --- as if there was any doubt.
Elon Musk’s robot is going to have to work hard to impress at Tesla’s AI Day