skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Seems impractical to expect end users to monitor the history of where money sent to them comes from. Would expect enforcement to be at the currency exchange point.
make something up.

send messages extolling the utility of brrlftz
discuss how every body not taking advantage of brrlftz will miss out.
let your SO know that you need as much brrlftz as can be produced and delivered.

keep your eye out for cheap imitations offered to you.
Unrelated: What's the current state of FreeBSD on a laptop? What's the recommended hardware setup? Is it something I'd feel confident travelling with as my primary computing machine?
I fucking love LXC! It allowed me to “virtualize” several physical servers on a single newer server, keeping all of the original setup (except some networking changes). Combined with ipvlan, I could even work around the MAC address restriction of my server provider, with both IPv4 and IPv6.

I also use it to host a Jitsi instance. Jitsi is rather picky about the underlying distribution.

All this without the overhead of an actual virtual machine of course.

The only pain I have with LXC is its behavior when errors occur. It’s not easy to tell what’s wrong, the error messages are worthless. Sometimes the debug log can help, sometimes not so much.
> JSON is the worst form of encoding — except for all the others that have been tried.

Edgy pessimism is tiring, we get it everything sucks but this is the best we got, even though you still hate it.

> It’s not easily read by humans, but it can be read by humans.

What does this even mean, why, how? It’s so easy to complain about something without admitting you don’t have a better solution.

Maybe I’m bitter from my ERP dev ops role where I’m constantly enduring little thorns throughout the pipeline and overall codebase. But this way of thinking isn’t practical, you won’t get far if they’re what you deal with day to day.
nasa also doesn't have the luxury of picking their own direction, or tech stack, or doing whatever they want. nasa is burdened by Congress dictation what rocket to build, even if it isn't the rocket nasa wants. look at the river program though, nasa still does cutting edge stuff with cutting edge hardware, at really high quality. just don't look at sls or iss
Some people are running wifi via a Linux in bhyve (wifibox).

Making it easier to port Linux drivers to run in native FreeBSD (via linuxkpi) is definitely a better route though.
It needs charts and shit. Then you could dump Prometheus too!
Maybe: Redshirts https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redshirts_(novel)
I have not read it but maybe I will.
I would add Bitwarden, and its self-hosted rust version - Vaultwarden.

Also Caddy - a web engine which is actually useable (and great)
My guess is that the personal code of ethics that people run with who work there or work for other companies that produce goods that are bad for people (e.g., tobacco) is that their belief in individual choice is the primary factor.

In this way, the poor choices people make is not the responsibility of the person offering the choice, it's the responsibility of the chooser. You can sell heroine this way and sleep like a baby.

It's not totally crazy if you think what you're offering is not coercive and that people can and should look out for their best interests. This doesn't work for my ethics because I think, basically, that some people aren't so great at looking out for their own best interests and can be tricked or seduced into hurting themselves. If someone is weak in whatever way that they can be tricked into hurting themselves, this is a soft form of coercion.

Ethically though it's not totally cut and dried. Pretty much everyone engaged in behavior where they might come out ahead relative to another (e.g., buying/selling a car, aiming for a promotion or raise, etc). I work for a company that sells shiny baubles and people buy stuff they can't really afford partly because of our slick marketing. I feel this is better than working for Meta, but is it? I don't know. Being ethical while living under an unethical system is almost impossible and requires significant sacrifice. If I'm being honest, I'm not willing to make that sacrifice, so I'm already compromising my ethics to _some_ level too. I guess we all just pick our levels.
The platform variance for x86/x64 CPUs is... way bigger. The actual instructions per-clock could be wildly different and has massive impact on performance than just the clockspeed.
$400,000 worth of eth isn't "nominal" though.
Counterpoint: plenty of studies showing that for many jobs WFH works well, and yet everyone is forcing RTO. Assuming that science/efficiency/logic has anything to do with the decisions being made is a bit naive.
Issues with the Internet date to its origins ... and inventors. Paul Baran in the 1960s, amongst others, whom I've compiled here:

<https://toot.cat/@dredmorbius/105074933053020193>

Sources / instances date to the 1980s or earlier, addressing specifically the false assertion by many that "nobody saw this coming".
Most sourdough is gross. It's very rare that I prefer it over a nice loaf of simple white or whole wheat bread. One advantage it has, is its unique taste. It reminds me of Clam Chowder and nice seafood restaurants. However, if they offered a simple baguette instead I would be perfectly happy.
At an even more meta level, whether interests are even competing is itself something subject to differing definitions.

Take the word “regulation”. According to wiktionary, it comes from “regō”, which means “to keep straight, direct, govern, rule”.

Direction requires a desired destination. We would like to steer the environment away from highly adulterated/dangerous drugs, away from harmful drug use generally, away from territorial violence, and away from drugs being sold to children.

Those that advocate for “deregulation” as well as decriminalization are really advocating for emergent peer to peer regulation instead of regulation by fiat. They generally think the best way to keep systems accountable and moving in the desired societal direction is for individuals to have as much freedom and direct feedback as possible about the consequences of their actions, which they argue leads to better individual decision making due to that better feedback.

Those that advocate for government regulation generally think it’s easier to keep systems accountable if you concentrate the most competent and responsible people into an explicit, transparent enforcement organization, which they argue leads to better decision making due to that better guidance and enforcement.

The former worry most about ineffective or bad actors in government enforcement systems distant from feedback/information. The latter worry most about ineffective or bad actors in the populace that are allowed to grow without coordinated enforcement/ability to organize.

I don’t think a lot of the arguing over different solutions to drug problems are really arguing about incompatible approaches, they’re just focused on different parts of the problem.

In my personal view, I think the BIGGEST problem from all camps is a lack of desire to really confront the core issues/invest the time and effort needed to actually solve these problems, which is a lot more about sitting down with people in very unpleasant situations/doing a lot of very difficult therapeutic communication, dealing with personal anger at irresponsible people, dealing with our disgust, not liking what we see reflected about ourselves, not liking to admit how much we actually DON’T control, not liking to acknowledge our own hypocrisies/how we contribute to the problem, not liking to acknowledge vast experiential differences and how important close connections are, not liking to admit how many people don’t prioritize themselves or others and are ungrateful/resentful, etc. We’d like to simply “get someone else to deal with it”, whether that be the government, the immediate family/individuals themselves, an app, a magic pill, some kind of secret drug problem destroying machine, etc.
MIT License?

For me that drastically increases the "potentially shady" factor.
I'm not sure this is a good parallel, both because the blockchain itself isn't an entity which can be made responsible, only users of it, and also because a discussion over the phone isn't copyright material being hosted. I suspect nodes serving the blockchain could be made liable similar to torrent peers.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2018:3&...

That doesn't appear to check out biblicaly, or from any logical perspective I can think of.
The Switch CPU isn't actually that terrible. You can run into issues with the number of cores. The main thing you will find is that generally most codebases are full of potential optimizions but they aren't acted on until you find yourself constrained.
Outside of OS & text editor (vim), there is one tool that I use countless times every, single, day:

fzf (https://github.com/junegunn/fzf)

I can only wonder how much time fzf has saved me in the long term.

In terms of "software that I don't use for writing software", iA Writer is probably what I am most grateful for.
For things that UBsan checks for, yes, but there's a ridiculous amount of things that are surprisingly UB in C(++).
I used to think that. I was watching a video from a guy (Rick Beato) claiming to not monetize the particular video I was watching (he's never claimed not to monetize any of his videos). He no more than said I'm not monetizing this video when it stopped for an ad. I watch a lot of music instruction videos and it's obvious the content creators are not in control of ad placements. Ads appear whenever Google damn well decides they'll appear, even if it's the most inopportune time for the video. In that way YouTube is actually worse than TV.
Auto loans are not normally thought of as revolving lines of credit, but many consumers treat them as such. As soon as one car is paid off (or even before), they trade it in for a new one with a new loan (sometimes rolling over negative equity).

The used auto market has been hot the last couple years, so it’s hard to predict what happens. But since most consumers buy based on the monthly payment, higher rates mean smaller, less luxurious car, which has implications for the profitability of auto manufacturers.

Also, some consumers have been using their homes as piggy banks, refinancing each time the value increases. When happens to consumer spending when they can’t do that?
You can get anything you want at Alice's Restaurant!
An Interdisciplinary View on Prototypes
Huh, didn't realize that. I was on the older side for my grade — turned 18 at the end of junior year – so I guess it didn't come up.
I mean falcon 9 is the tech debt. they are no longer working on it, only maintenance mode. their goal is to get a new stack of tech working, before falcon 9 becomes too out dated. falcon 9 had such. ahead start, that it is still better than everything else in it's class. but it won't be long now until it because just another rocket in the market. I give 5 -10 years and it isn't special anymore. SpaceX is betting that starship will be larger and cheaper and working by then.
I recently found out that you can just click "log in" and then click the "X" in the top left to close the modal, without actually logging in.

Previously I was using this bookmarklet:

javascript:(function()%7Bdocument.querySelector("html").style%5B'overflow'%5D %3D 'visible'%7D)()%3B
Neal Stephenson is making his own virtual world called THEE Metaverse
Aluminum is cheaper per mass than copper, and has higher conductivity/density. Aluminum is orders of magnitude more adundant in the Earth's crust than copper.
I wouldn't recommend the O'Reilly book for a beginner, use the official book in the docs, and do Rustlings alongside that. That's how I learned. Rustlings especially smooths you into the concepts while the O'Reilly book starts off writing a Mandelbrot generator as the first project, which put me off of that.
This is very old knowledge, I known even before 2014, that Russians tried to switch to opensource, to avoid sanctions, inherited from USSR.

But this switch is a looooong way, they spent more than 15 years, and HUGE money, and still most important banks (not speak about tech companies) are vulnerable to just ordinary software license revoke.

I don't say this impossible, I even know few people who choose evil side.

But from what I see at the moment, they still have not switched most important infrastructure to open source.

I even could say, I don't see really good financing of important local projects, mostly money feed ineffective monsters, like Glonass and elbrus cpu, or just plundered.
users should just get used to recreating their own transaction obfuscation, mostly to avoid getting flagged at exchanges

what someone on twitter wrote is pretty apt:

deposit the Ether in AAVE to borrow USDC, move the USDC to another address and send that to Coinbase to cash out

pretty much just walk away from the deposited Ether, let that get collateral called eventually. The protocol can enjoy its sanctioned money.
Thanks for that URL tip, that'll come in handy.

Having more speed dial buttons would have made the desk phone a bit nicer to have. Some people in the office which used the phone a 10 speed dial buttons but a lot of the phones just had four buttons which one showed your cureent status.

Forward to cell is fine but it's only half the full feature of having your extension actually on your phone. You can receive calls, but placing them and having it show up as your office number is trickier. Our VoIP system eventually came out with halfway decent phone apps but it was a bit clunky how it actually worked internally migrating the presence from the desk phone or soft phone to the phone app.
Maybe in a relative sense, but OpenBSD's Wi-Fi situation is poor. Period.
Even confusianism is said to put the emphasis on the group rather than the individual. So contrasting with many occidental cultures.
woah this is a cool thing that I didn't know I could do
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/dec/22/joe-biden/...

> "This is a pandemic of the unvaccinated," Biden said in the full interview. "The unvaccinated. Not the vaccinated, the unvaccinated. That’s the problem. Everybody talks about freedom and not to have a shot or have a test. Well guess what? How about patriotism? How about making sure that you’re vaccinated, *so you do not spread the disease to anyone else."* (*emphasis mine*)

https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2...

> The vaccines that we have against COVID are incredibly effective vaccines. And people have seen the results from the clinical trials of, you know, anywhere in the 80 percent range, 90 percent range of efficacy. But that doesn't mean that 100 percent of people, 100 percent of the time are going to be protected against disease. There is no vaccine that provides that level of protection for any disease. So we do expect in any vaccine program that there will be rare, but there will be cases of disease among people who were fully vaccinated and certainly among some people who were partially vaccinated. This doesn't mean that the vaccines aren't working. It doesn't mean that there's something wrong with the vaccines. What it does mean is that not everybody who receives vaccines has 100 percent protection

To me, that means that chances of not getting covid are 80-90%, so out of 100 vaccinated people, only 10-20 will get covid... which was a "good enough" risk reduction for me.

also

https://www.msnbc.com/transcripts/transcript-rachel-maddow-s... (interview with CDC Director, Dr. Rochelle Walensky )

> And we have -- we can kind of almost see the end. We`re vaccinating so very fast, our data from the CDC today suggests, you know, that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don`t get sick, and that it`s not just in the clinical trials but it`s also in real world data.
More than you think? =;-{)} Wo remembers the "Anonymous FTP Sites List"?
Followup to be precise: Undefined behavior in C++, of course, can have a definition set by the implementation. With the right switches, GCC will guarantee certain overflow behaviors. But a priori, the compiler is not bound by any guarantees.
At least this page says 486 stores and loads are 1 cycle: https://zsmith.co/intel_m.php#mov

But it's been over 25 years since I last wrote asm for a 486 CPU.
Shellcheck https://github.com/koalaman/shellcheck : Shell scripts are unavoidable, you have to write one every now and then but shell is a terrible language with massive footguns around every corner. I don't write shell scripts extensively enough to remember all those footguns and even if I did, not sure I'd want to waste brainpower remembering all that archaic trivia.

Shellcheck makes writing shell scripts bearable and dare I say somewhat enjoyable. They have managed to collate all the shell scripting potholes and tribal knowledge into one static analysis tool. No shell script now gets checked in at work or on my personal machine without being pumped through shellcheck.
I believe the right term here is WebView, which will use the OS's native browser framework to display the app. For Windows this would be Microsoft Edge WebView2 and for Linux webkit2gtk. I do believe Qt WebEngine (or Qt WebView) might be the better option for Linux though, although I'm guessing webkit2gtk is being used because of more readily available Go bindings.
lxc/lxd was the reason I went with ubuntu, but snap is why I migrated my containers to docker (and will soon move to debian)
The reason you aren't reporting being the victim of a crime is because, given only what you've told me so far, you weren't. You came close sure, but altering the statistics to reflect the emotions of you and your friends would actually make them less accurate than keeping them strictly objective. As such, I stand by my previous comment.
> The information on the blockchain is not illegal.

Validators aren't just storing the information. They're actively processing transactions and getting paid to do it.

> Copyrighted material on blockchain has been discussed many times, it is just not viable attack because blockchain space is crazy expensive.

That's not a very satisfying conclusion to the topic
The seeming after the fact politicization of the battle hundreds of years later interesting. On the "French" side it turns from a fair fight between good men to honarable nobles defending the peasants from foreign mercenaries, and on the "English" side it's remembered as a loss inflicted partially due to dirty tricks by the "French".
I use LXD these days and I love it. It's easy enough to deploy without knowing too much internal details. Its CLI is also intuitive and well designed. It's true that LXD doesn't support installation outside snap. However, many distros like Alpine, Arch and Gentoo support its installation on bare metal from their software repos.
Make a Website
it's funny, because I believe the author has contributed to at least 4 of these directly in his day job, and has published code for a few more.
But I guess you can't buy bread with substantial contributions, if ability to buy bread is our metric. But it's not a good metric.
User Onboarding Mistakes and How to Avoid Them
They are unclear about the definition of "misinformation", making it completely subjective by designating sites as "untrustworthy" because it allows them to fit the "study" to the outcome they want.
The Case for Coed Sports
Goodlist, I would add Stable Diffusion
For those unfamiliar, not as wet as you might think: <http://www.paulgraham.com/submarine.html> <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13993>
The main reason we chose Go was compilation speed since our product would need to quickly compile and generate something that is fast to startup, and Graal was just too slow when we prototyped things.

The GC benchmarks we did showed that Go would work as well, so we begrudgingly moved to it.
> " [..] which are just shell scripts for bootstrapping and configuring your container and pretty common between distros. "

I find it a big advantage that this builds the containers basically from scratch and you only have to trust the distro and not any other parties. I'm always feeling uneasy with images which are hard to inspect and whose provenance is opaque and potentially involved multiple parties.

That, combined with running them unprivileged, should make a fairly secure system. Unfortunately I had great difficulty to create an unprivileged Debian LXC container with this method. If I remember correctly you have to create the privileged container first and then use a tool to fix-up uid and gid. If anyone knows an easier way to do it, I would be grateful to know.

EDIT:
I think I used the following to create the container:

lxc-create -n <name> -t debian -- -r stretch

It uses deboostrap for the build.
And the Linux kernel is introducing Rust code [0] due to the fact that even Linus Torvalds acknowledges that Rust solves issues that would be prevalent in C code.

[0] https://www.zdnet.com/article/linus-torvalds-rust-will-go-in...
Maybe something like a 'WikiInfo' (or another better name :) ), that contains a hierarchy of (potentially all) known pages and topics? I think the only way to tackle this problem is collaboratively and distributedly.

You could add for example a 'Newspapers' topic, and then say 'The Springfield Times' and then have 'Articles by date', 'Articles by topic', etc. like a huge database (browsed hierarchically like "WHERE dates BETWEEN '20121211' and '20121213'", etc.). The primary datastructure could be a database, and users can add hierarchies as queries to the underlying database -- a collaborative index (in the literal sense, like a Homepage of the internet) is shown. Any unique 'object' (like a specific newspaper) gets an UUID and a row in the db. I don't know how modern dbs handle sparse data, but that'd definitely be a requirement (i.e. each object can have a handful of millions of possible properties, like publication date, location, author, colour, etc.).
Yeah this is a Last Team Standing.
Power companies can offer more than one pricing formula.

People who want to minimize their power bill can choose to pick the time of use pricing and shift some of their consumption off peak. Others can choose to pay more for the convenience of not having to worry about all that stuff. How much more, that can be determined by market forces.
CPU wise - although you can optimize specially for the ARM - and it's great to make sure your math is using NEON and that you don't have some pathological slow down because your code assumes more cores you'll still find the lions share of your optimization on CPU benefiting both architectures.

For fun, I'll mention that there is a hardware hash function that you can use. The public A57 documentation has a performance guide available that is applicable to the Switch.

https://developer.arm.com/documentation/uan0015/b/
Distributed Memory Access is just another kind of Non-Uniform Memory Access, which is Yet Another Leaky Abstraction. Specifically, if you care about performance at all you now have to worry about where in RAM your data lives.

Caring about where in memory your data lives is different from dealing with cache or paging. Programmers have to plan ahead to keep frequently accessed data in fast RAM, and infrequently accessed data in "slow" RAM. You'll probably need special APIs to allocate and manage memory in the different pools, not unlike the Address Windowing Extensions API in Microsoft Windows.

And once you extend "memory" outside the chassis, you'll have to design your application with the expectation that any memory access could fail because a network failure means the memory is no longer accessible.

If you only plan to deploy in a data center then maybe you can ignore pointer faults, but that is still a risk, especially if you decide to deploy something like Chaos Monkey to test your fault tolerance.
Ah, I hadn't realized that (though I should have, I have passed devices through to bhyve as well).

I actually think running RHEL binary drivers (where there is a defined KBI), might be the best route.