skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No, this is cope.

If the evidence shows that Magnus played badly, we do not have to jump to the conclusion that actually he was playing badly on purpose, for the intent of trying to detect a cheater. He himself wasn't even stupid enough to claim this.

No, instead, I am going to trust other grandmasters opinions that he was merely playing badly.
Horrible Redirection Insanity (Wireguard.com)
view-source:https://www.wireguard.com/horrible-redirection-insanity/

Used for links on the donors page: https://www.wireguard.com/donations/
>During startup, the console would display the modules after it loaded them. People attributed failure to load the next module as a failure of the last one visible.

Then why didn't they print a message before loading a module? This is really simple stuff, and would immediately show the problem. This is pretty normal in printing to logfiles in software: print messages both before and after an action is taken, so if it gets stuck in the action, you see that it never succeeded though it was started.
0 A.D. team amazes me. They keep churning release after release with such quality. There is even M1 support for this one. Keep up the great work team. Very grateful for your gifts :)
It’s cool, and I hadn’t heard of it before!

But unfortunately, like many such Twitter threads, it’s just plagiarized from the Wikipedia article[1]. Some of the phrases are paraphrased, others are copied and pasted.

1. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tripitaka_Koreana
Possibly a dumb question, but why does that article state a photon's wavelength increases with time? I am paraphrasing the line where they explain how expanding universes suggest black holes cause photons in the thought experiment.

Also, if we do chuck out unitarity, does that mean we can "break" experiments like stern Gerlach by just making them take a really long time?
India really is a different dimension. This high tier thinking was happening 3000 years ago which is mind blowing to me.
Processing low frequency business signals out of high frequency noise
Bow down to your supreme leader fellow HN’ers. If HN karma points were guilt points, you’d all elect me in an instant.
I recently found some screenshots of SimCity on the Commodore 64, which I believe is one of the earliest versions - or at least the most primitive.

https://www.mobygames.com/game/c64/simcity/screenshots
Maybe.

https://julianmacfarlane.substack.com/p/how-the-west-was-won...
Reminiscent of LBJ dictating to aides while on the toilet. A power play.
> Unfortunately the inline demos seem to now be broken

They work for me. I'm using Chrome 105 on a Pixel 4a.
I completely agree with you. We need to be more conscious of our environment and how we are using it up.

We need to stop building our economies on the need for growth, which is unsustainable.

Focusing on a more sustainable approach would be great for everyone, especially the planet.
The Troublesome Legacy of the Early Romantics
There is a good reason. In countries with genuine gender equality women naturally gravitate to certain fields and tech isn’t one of them. It’s probably biology but we can’t be certain.
The Expansion oft the universe would cause a slow increase in wavelengh over time
https://www.alumni.hbs.edu/careers/job-search/Pages/resumes-...

HBS templates and examples for comparison (the sections that say login required apparently do not actually require a login; fyi)
From the site footer:

> Gentoo Studio is not an official project of the Gentoo Foundation, of which I am a member. This site is maintained by me, Damien Moody, a.k.a. Audiodef. The Gentoo Foundation bears no responsibility for the content of this site. The Gentoo logo and Gentoo name are used according to the licensing guidelines set forth by the Gentoo Foundation.
Why would I need something else than RSS?
This misunderstands the role of CTO which is to be a single point of responsibility and leadership for all the deliverables in engineering. And a lot of times CTOs are actually CPOs as well meaning they are also the final desk and driving force behind the strategic direction of new development as well.

Middle management overhead is real but this isn’t really an example of it — there is always a CTO and a CPO but not always in name. Sometimes they’re technical and in the trenches, other times at small companies it’s the CEO who’s wearing multiple hats.
The interesting thing is that what they did wouldn’t even be a crime if the doctors they paid didn’t work with Medicare patients. The anti kickback statute only applies to government funded health insurance programs. These same laws are also why manufacturers can’t offer copay assistance programs to people on Medicare. Applying these laws everywhere could probably reduce waste dramatically.

Also there’s a very high ROI and not very often discussed career path: Work in sales at big pharma company or home health care company or really any compare that bills Medicare, find False Claim Act violations and a lawyer to represent you, and collect 15-30% of settlement (should be 8 to 9 figures if you played your cards right).
tl==tech lead, not team lead right? Yeah tech lead is a great role, assuming you have the space and freedom to actually execute a tech roadmap.
Is there no way to reliably manipulate data without direct leads like precise magnetism or something? Couldn’t you manipulate the serial numbers on what I assume is an isolated ROM in these components that way?
This document's typography and layout are all over the place. Normally I wouldn't particularly care, but the goal here is to give advice on the resume/CV.
Gen Z still qualifies for their Gen X parents healthcare … until they turn 26. My 1998 born grad student daughter for instance still will be on my Gen X healthcare I pay for until her 2024 birthday of 26yo. Probably why Gen X pays the most for healthcare.
I agree with this. I believe computer scientists and programmers especially just solve problems because they can, not really giving much thought to how those technologies actually affect society. They do it because it's cool and because they get paid a lot. And while a lot of computing has made life better, a lot of other computing (tracking, social media, making consumerism more efficient, AI to replace people) generally makes society worse.
The psychological trigger words the new iPhone marketing
You've seen the film The Man with the Golden Gun ? A cufflink here, a pen there, that pack of chewing gum... assembled together could be a cheating device.
Yeah, which is baffling. It's not possible to invest in decreasing your foreign currency price. Price is an exogenous variable in a competitive market. You can invest in the production process so that production becomes more cost-effective and this allows you to lower prices, but that has nothing to do with devaluations, and certainly is not the mechanism through which exports prices fall when a currency depreciates.
Most of the industry people I worked with while supporting research in CS were in research labs in industry. A few collaborations were with companies who wanted something specific developed and assigned one of their group to work with us, but for more open ended research industry research labs are the way to go I think. DARPA projects often worked with us on research by pairing us with industry engineers.
When you interview for your next role, you should request an additional conversation with your new manager and get their thoughts on:

1. What is their philosophy on team development? (Ask for examples)

2. What is the career ladder look like? When was the last person promoted to a Sr role?

In addition, you should lay out growth areas you'd like to focus on. A good manager should be able to work with you and chart a path forward.

On a side note: There are other online communities to help you level up while you are in your current role. DM me for recs.
The article lists average sales price and income. Since you mentioned Cleveland it was #48

#48 Cleveland $192,700 $45,448
I feel you are arguing for real harm now, versus potential harm in the future.

There's no sign that being very-backward-compatible is holding Windows back that I can see.

In the other hand I have collected a set of utilities into my work-flow that are easily 20+ years old, and they all work fine.

The last major cull from Microsoft was that 16bit programs ceased to work on 64 bit platforms. Other than that I've never had an app fail.

Most of those utility supplies have long since disappeared, retired, or died. But I can still keep transferring those apps to the next machine and they keep running.

None of this impacts the quality of my current offerings. Ultimately all this costs me is some cheap disk space.
Ahh, CSS. The only thing to come along in my career with computer science and make me feel less guilty about how I abuse the C Preprocessor.
Well, even endgames with as few as 5 pieces on the board are beyond what a human can solve with memorization. I don't disagree that blitz is mostly pattern recognition and rapid tactical thinking, but that applies all the way down to the end.
It depends on what you're trying to do. If you're just storing user data, then SQL is fine. But if you need to store a lot of information about each user, like their posts or comments and the corresponding metadata (like who they're replying to), then NoSQL databases are better because they're optimized for that kind of structure.
He was a busy guy
That's outdated, now that we have deep learning the machines are great at high level strategy too.
As someone who has gotten deep into genealogy, this is why I am of two minds of facial recognition in photos. I'd love a place to find photos of my ancestors that others upload or hell even photos of myself I just happen to be in. On the other hand that is super creepy.

There is one place I have found that does it for civil war photos. https://www.civilwarphotosleuth.com/

I guess with enough of a time gap, it is less creepy? Maybe WWI photos next?
No worries, currently PLA rocket force deliberately entangles nuclear with conventional capabilities for deterrence - hard for PRC adversaries to math the cost of striking rocket force because can't know if launchers mated with nukes or not. That'll probably change once PRC builds up sufficient nuclear deterrence.

Sidenote: Entire PRC PGS talk is where PLA literature and strategic posture is trending towards - they're short/medium term future capabilties with little open source info other than PRC is doing 100s of missile tests and year and pouring massive resources into hypersonics. IMO there's a reason US reaction to PRC GFOBs demonstration was much louder than those of carrier killer missiles. The former is designed to hit fixed targets CONUS that are hard to disrupt/defend, the latter on carrier groups with difficult kill chain and many counter measures.
MAD game theory are recalibrated when new capabilities are introduced. Just like when survivable nuclear triad introduced second strike options from hair trigger LOW.

Consider every major US power projection platform have nuclear capable options, but US adversaries can't afford to default assume that cruise missiles from carriers air wings or subs or long range bombers are nuclear tipped. They know US wouldn't escalate to nuclear right away when there are conventional options. MAD around ICBM is based on presumption that up until recently, terminal guidance for intercontinental strikes aren't accurate or cost effective enough warrant anything but nuclear delivery. But that changes when conventional global strikes becomes technnologically and economically viable. US can claim they'll maintain launch on warning to any inbound ICBMs, but in a shooting war, when US is using forward assets to conventionally strike targets of adversaries on their homeland, but said adversaries has the capability to hit back to disrupt strategic targets on CONUS, they're absolutely going to.

IMO CONUS being vunerable to conventional strikes will open up another layer of MAD / deterrance strategies for conventional attacks. Which is to say US will lose unilateral ability to deter with conventional attacks it historically had because geographic isolation of CONUS was more or less immune to conventional rocket fires. There's already assumed MAD on cyberwarfare - Biden/US position on attack of critical infra is equivalent to conventional attack - result of network technology making US homeland vunerable. Hypersonics will be no different, but this time it will be US adversaries who can also dictate conventional attacks on their soil will be met with convetional attacks on US soil. Say US attacks mainland PRC in TW scenario or if blockade of PRC energy imports turn into shooting war to deprive PRC of 80% oil imports, why would PRC not also use cyber/hypersonics to take out 80% of US refinery capacity? Should create stability-instability paradox for conventional warfare unless huge progress in ABM/missile defense.
> Can most of these predictions in the article even be wrong?

There's no specific timeline given for falsifiability, but the title implies that we could generously bound it by 2100 or 2122. Assuming we had such a timeframe, and looking only at the first 20:

3, 4, 8, and 12 contain specific predictions that can be easily determined to be true or false.

1 and 5 contain predictions that lack numerical specificity, but if they had it, they would be easily determined to be true or false.

2, 7, 9, 10, 14, and 16 contain predictions that are somewhat vague, but I think most people could reasonably agree on a specific, easily determinable prediction that captures the intent of the prediction.

11 and 13, to the extent that I can draw a prediction out of them, seem to reflect things that already exist today. (I might also stick 2 in here as well).

15 and 18 describe things that contain somewhat vague predictions where I think reasonable agreement on specific, easily determinable predictions is challenging.

6, 17, 19, and 20 are hot garbage.

So if you're being pretty strict, 20% of the predictions contain something falsifiable; if you're being charitable, you can't push it past 70%. Although I would personally credit only the first two categories (so, 30%).

(FWIW, I agree with... almost none of these predictions.)
> He was not intimidating or manipulating his opponents outside of the board

They absolutely were blundering much more than they did vs other opponents, showing a far lower quality off play than usual. Also I believe you didn't read much about his championship match. Remember how the games were moved to a different room, and why?
Yeah, that was my first thought. The author thinks they are extending CSS, but actually reinvented HAML with CSS syntax.

CSS as a language is supposed to apply to an existing DOM tree, not synthesize an entirely new one. The selector syntax alone is too ambiguous to actually do that, because it is a search lookup, not a tree structure (even though SASS/LESS can make it look like one). If you specify, say, three `svg path` selectors with rules in them, you aren't asking for three separate paths in an SVG node. You're asking for all paths in all SVG elements, including grandchildren and great-grandchildren, to be handed all of the rules in all matching selectors.

If we wanted to make this idea work while not redefining CSS selectors, we'd have to ban the descendent combinator (because it would create infinite node hierarchies), and use the child combinator and nth-child everywhere exclusively. So instead of `svg path` you'd have `svg > path:nth-child(1)`. And probably a `::synthesize()` selector for saying, "yes I want this CSS rule to create a DOM node".
Phantom Bouquets: Two Books on the Art of Skeleton Leaves (1864)
No, actually grandparent is correct here - Skylake-X/Skylake-SP have never clocked down the first time they see an AVX-512 instruction. It actually is when the AVX instructions start to get dense enough to justify a voltage swing upwards. This actually exists in Haswell as well - certain AVX2 instructions are designated "heavy" and if you get enough of them you'll enter a voltage or frequency transition.

On Skylake-X there are more states... AVX-512 light and heavy as well.

https://travisdowns.github.io/blog/2020/01/17/avxfreq1.html#...

https://travisdowns.github.io/blog/2020/08/19/icl-avx512-fre...
I mean one way to so it would be to just write: I consider this project complete and have it running ever since
All virtuous people / groups are swiftly overrun by those who would act in their own interest.

This has been going on for at least some time, and likely confers at least some evolutionary advantage.
I've been on both sides of this argument. Return files as originally named vs return files based on a filenaming rule. I think both have merit, but there's an asterisk next to each with a list of caveats. GIGO is always fun.
With modern digital signals, which can be encrypted, and be pretty low power. And with there being lots of radio signals from unknown sources in any populated area. I doubt you'd be able to distinguish the signal from the noise. Unless the entire thing takes place in a fariday cage.
A new automation workflow engine based on low code programming language
Eh casual play has so many factors. I wouldn't put much weight on how badly a gm loses on the beach. For example, drugs could have been involved.

I do think Hans is cheating, but I think the proof will lie in statistical analysis of his games and demonstrating that he has an unusual (>3200 rated) propensity to clutch out specific moves. I think everyone suspects at this point that if Hans is cheating, its only a handful of moves per game.
Why not just do it yourself? I'll humor you, just this time.

https://archive.ph/zQdix
1) So why force it upon people? Moreso, best privacy policies means you should minimize the amount that the user needs to do. People make mistakes. You're supposed to make mistakes harder to make, not easier. The more methodical you have to be, the less privacy preserving your product is. I'm apologize, but this sounds like gymnastics to justify the outcome. Maybe you don't care about privacy? Maybe you think us privacy concerned people are nuts? But welcome to HN and welcome to the world where data privacy advocates are starting to make wins. But your argument comes off as "well sucks for you, you should have done better." A victim's actions may contribute to the danger they are in, but at the end of the day that's not the issue. The issue is that they are a victim and why this kind of discourse comes off as victim blaming.

2) Again, security practices should simplify not complexify. More complexity less security. Why force this on people? Why victim blame? Try to make fewer victims, not more.

3) Because Google (and others) are using this login method as a means of centralization and standardization. As you are breaking away from Google you're probably seeing that it isn't trivial and that there are a lot of things you lose because of it (despite HN users often saying roll your own email or saying that email is very decentralized). I would argue that Google has some blame for the difficulties to wean yourself off of them. They created a platform with the explicit intent to make it burdensome to leave. That's not ensuring competition is abundant within our communities. (3 is all big picture stuff but this does matter. I have examples if you care)

4) I get your point, but I think there's a middle ground. The bigger problem is that it is difficult to use other services. There are also websites that don't allow me to log in through any other means. (I only use the Google sign-on for a singular website which does this).

I do not feel it is okay to just dismiss these issues outright. I have the right to criticize the framework. You have the right to disagree. Google has the right to ignore my complaints/critiques. But you're not really disagreeing with my comments so much as dismissing them. Effective communication does require us to discuss in good faith with one another.
Curiosity got to me and I finally tried the GitHub Copilot free trial. My conclusion is that it's good for that stuff I would have googled, like "I can't remember, how do I get the date again?" or "Is it array.count() or count(array)?" Instead of typing it in Google I just type it in a comment. It's like having google in the IDE.
I got a lot of mileage out of copying Apple's marketing tone and word choice. It got me to stop thinking about the features I'd built and think instead about how and why people would use them.
Ask HN: How do you test micro services?
My team currently uses Pact/Pact Flow for contract testing. I want to take some time to understand this problem better.
What makes you think that animals and plants are less affected by unusual weather than humans? Most species have a lot less technology to help them cope with the change.
Then why do I have a copy?
It's ridiculously difficult to obtain a properly-balanced, nutritious diet when you've chosen to reject major components such as flesh meat, gluten, anything that's cooked, etc.

Beef alone, as a source of iron and other vitamins that are needed especially by men, is critical.

People are now trying to raise children and animals on vegan or keto or gluten-free diets, and I call that cruelty. The effects of malnutrition are subtle and long-term, and so people who go on a fad diet for a while will not notice, and people who routinely eat any sort of junk food and processed food do not notice that they are malnourished yet obese.

My mental health improves by leaps and bounds when I eat a healthy diet: I feel better simply because I'm not abusing my body, I feel satisfaction in preparing wholesome meals with known ingredients in my own kitchen, I enjoy saving money. Moreover, my sleep hygiene improves and my daily schedule approaches something of a productive citizen instead of a listless, lethargic couch potato.

Since I do suffer from chronic mental illness centralized around mood disorders, having a good healthy diet is absolutely essential to my healing and recovery, more than any drug, alongside therapy and regular meditation and practice of my faith in Christ.
Does this mean that the notion of conservation of energy is actually preserved? Everywhere says its not except on local scales but this almost sounds like dark energy/the creation of more space is fuelled by light.
Yes, I agree. All users should be forced to re-evaluate all the apps they are using everytime they get a new device.

It doesn't matter if that tool you currently use is perfect, or the game you play is just fun as-it-is, it is clearly harmful to you (and makes the app store "less vibrant".

Everything older than 2 years must go. Crumbs, everything older than 1 year should go... Nay make that 1 month...

Who cares if users like an old app, "vibrancy" matters most.

/s
Some years ago I was asked to record interviews with older family members for a class in collage. The result was something similar to this interview, those college interviews have become family memories.
Something about the person in the foreground made me think of Gene Simmons of the band Kiss. After looking through pictures of him, some of which also showed Paul Stanley (also of Kiss), I felt the latter was a possible match. Four people replying to the article linked from below this picture shared this opinion.

Tat I would have the original thought seems rather odd to me, as I know almost nothing about Kiss and I'm not sure I have ever heard of Stanley before. Almost everything I know about Simmons comes from his rather infamous interview by Terry Gross of WHYY.
>I have a problem when we do it to ourselves.

Why?
US people kill more US people than any other nation.
Seems more logical to keep yourselves under constant surveillance. Tight GPS tracking surely will help solving homicides.
Yup, but they have a lot of different awesome projects on the fire, it can be hard to know which one to use:

- https://github.com/deislabs/runwasi

- https://github.com/deislabs/hippo

- https://github.com/deislabs/wagi

- https://github.com/deislabs/krustlet

The description at the end of the article sounds like CGI, on WASM, which is what WAGI is.