skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
ADHD isn't necessarily a pathology. I.e. arguably there is nothing "wrong" with most people with that diagnoses, it is simply an adaptation where there was an evolutionarily stable balance of temperaments where some nontrivial ratio of people are more like seekers and wanderers and not satisfied with buckling down and doing the same stuff repeatedly.

ADHD is also at least in some people, a developmental problem sort of like a muscle imbalance where people learn to do an action with a set of muscles and neglect whole muscle groups and end up kind of able to do everything but with drawbacks because they weren't trained properly.

After a concussion and extensive testing, I discovered the latter about myself. There are a lot of things I'm quite good at with neurological tests and one working memory test that I'm just terrible at. So much started making sense when I discovered this about my whole life. And maybe my brain is just weird but what I actually think is it's something that just never got trained because I got good at other things early which compensated.

Now the struggle is finding professionals interested in helping instead of telling me everything will be better with an SSRI and talk about my feelings.

I'm sure that I'm still a certain kind of person, but a lot of my "symptoms" could actually be trained away if properly measured and exercised.
For me, this is the deal breaker, but this is still exciting to me:

> Note: At the moment ignite and ignited need root privileges on the host to operate due to certain operations (e.g. mount). This will change in the future.

I’d love it if this ends up getting changed. It’s a hard line to walk, but this would make Docker containers feasible on multi-user systems. (Without using Singularity, which has its own downsides).
Yeah for sure completely agree. Tbh I didn't think too deeply about the scenarios, they were more to put context around what I meant by "fires", and how not mentioning them (which some might consider lying) is necessary sometimes to steady the ship (though if a team member asked I'd let them know what's happening).

I do think scenario #1 is interesting to talk about though.

I.e. If I was that manager receiving that news, I wouldn't outright tell the devs and say "it could be crunch time for the next 6 months", which might cause a panic and devs will start looking for other jobs.

Instead I'd call a meeting with leadership / sales, see what was sold and if there's any flexibility on deliverables with the client. If we need more resource, is it worth finding funding to hire more staff, or maybe postpone another project to get this higher priority one done.

Once that's resolved then I can think about delivering the news. Maybe it's a non issue (e.g. a new team is spun up to handle the project and someone gets a promotion to head the team), maybe it's crunch time (in that case it's time to have a difficult conversation with the team), or maybe the client is flexible on delivery (so it's business as usual).

Again, I could see how some managers would be uncomfortable not telling their team everything (and potentially cause unnecessary panic) - but I think that's part of management, knowing what level of detail your team are happy with, knowing what you can / cannot handle, and knowing how to delivery good / bad news and sometimes having to be the bad guy.
KISS but unironically
> This was a deliberate choice with the support of Europeans. This is the price *we're* willing to pay

You really shouldn't speak on behalf of other people. I don't remember anyone being asked for their opinion or given a choice on this matter.

I'm sure people who work minimum wage jobs and are just trying to get by don't have the luxury to wage a questionable ideological and economic war, something you seem to take for granted.

For many people such a drastic increase in energy prices is the difference between barely getting by and choosing which days to go hungry.
> CTO is not a powerful position at most companies.

This I do agree with. Many CTOs don't actually have the entire engineering organization under them in the reporting chain (at a reasonably-mature company; not talking about a startup where the CTO is often one of the co-founders and runs engineering), so they have no real power to get other people to do what they think should be done.

At best they have an "Office of the CTO", or perhaps run the company's software architecture group (if the company even has one), and then they just have a tiny army of people who try their hardest to convince other teams to do things that aren't in their roadmap and would mean pissing off their bosses if they took them on. Not fun!
I don't think you can casually dismiss the ability of one of the greatest chess players to ever live to identify when his opponents are engaged, concentrating and thinking hard, and when they are not, without twisting common sense past its breaking point either.
Already switched to fly.io. It is also great, and its VM will not "sleeping while inactive"
Perfect when compared to the moves the top chess engines would make? Hikaru says he only scored 100% one time, and 70% is more typical for a GM, yet everyone does it?
> crypto decline caused by the russian invasion

What? One of the biggest recent decline in crypto happened when LUNA foundation dumped multiple billions as BTC in order to keep terra stable (didn’t work out). The other dump is caused because borrowing money for leverage won’t be as cheap as it was for at least the next 4 years (taking bloomberg projections of Fed rates here).

How is the invasion related to the dump at all?
Nice! Sadly, I play the 5 string banjo. I wish I had one of those for that instrument!
Here's one way how to think about this missile.

You start from the report to Congress [1]. On page 8:

In FY2022, the Air Force launched the Hypersonic Attack Cruise Missile (HACM) program to develop a hypersonic cruise missile that integrates Air Force and DARPA technologies. Some reports indicate that HACM is intended to be launched from both bombers and fighter aircraft, with a senior Air Force official noting that a B-52 could potentially carry 20 HACMs or more.

B-52 can carry 32 tons of munitions. So 20 of these missiles "or more" may mean that each missile is about 1500 kg. That's in line with the current AGM-86 long range air launched cruise missile [2], [3]. Of course, AGM-86 is subsonic, while HACM will be supersonic. AGM-86 has a range, depending on configuration, between 950 km and 2500 km (maybe even more, this is the non-classified range). I guess HACM will have a similar range. Being hypersonic means it's easier to carry out a saturation attack (you send more missiles than the enemy can defend against simultaneously).

That means, the US Air Force will be able to carry deterrence patrols with their B-52s in order to prevent China from sending a naval landing force to Taiwan. Without this weapon, the main deterrence was supposed to be provided by the US Navy and their carrier strike groups. With this weapon, the US Air Force may be able to provide a cost effective alternative.

[1] https://news.usni.org/2022/07/22/report-to-congress-on-hyper...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-86_ALCM

[3] https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/1046...
Was it a snakeboard?
That was a joke reddit post.
At least in Microsoft it’s very bad for your career to be involved in a “complete” project. Most Windows code just hums along doing it’s thing generating value and not breaking. But that value will never counted in a performance review of any engineer/manager.
Google “NASA dart” for some UI fun
While I mostly agree with you, let me play the devil a bit (just for fun!)

Let's agree with the base that (probably) most of the bugs will happen within the host defined imports (aka bugs in the systemcalls/kernel) vs bugs on the Wasm runtime per se.
In that front, Wasm host system call implementations will offer not that much advantage compared to other virtualization approaches such as Firecracker.

However, those advantages are only perceived when you run software that's already fully containerized (in a OCI-like container).
But here's the nit: there's many more software that is not containerized (for example: 3rd party libraries).

Running this libraries in Wasm can actually be more secure than running the native ones (since we are bringing Firecracker-like security to the systemcalls the library may use). Specially, when running this software locally.

So, in my view, Wasm forces most of the software to be secure, regardless of its kind (library or application/OCI-container).

It's a small thing that might make a big difference!
Here is another of Google's UI Easter eggs
Yeah I'm really confused about this guy. I get that the world is not black and white, and conditions aren't always ideal... but I absolutely do not put up with the kind of dishonesty he's seemingly advocating. Perhaps not everyone has the luxury to be so picky, but... damn, I really have not gotten the impression (in my experience, and in the experience of friends and acquaintances) that this sort of bullshit is that common. At least not at successful, healthy companies.
This needs to be on a plaque somewhere. Reproducible doesn't just mean build systems!
Ideally people would use the hotspots to back-haul IoT data. Its a business that is real, and could work (eg. TheThingNetwork, Amazon Sidewalk) but doesn't make a lot of sense to use as a customer until you see strong coverage in areas you need... which open-access incentives like crypto (or just paying hotspot owners) could theoretically help solve. The crypto-washing of an otherwise valid business model (even if not profitable business) probably ruined a lot of the potential for this business to be successful.

For example, instead of Lime scooters using 5g cell towers to track their scooters, they could use LoRa, which would be lower power, but it only works if the service area is already fully covered.
He does not have to write it...
I don't know much about chess, but it seems like Niemann now has to either maintain his performance in Chess without cheating, or cheat to maintain it if he can't without - in which case he could still be caught.
What rule is there against resigning?
> the opinion of the famous player

This is a hilariously inaccurate description of magnus. He is widely regarded as the greatest chess player to have ever lived. His opinion on what it takes to play high level chess is worth taking extremely seriously. It's not like he has a history of temper tantrums or petulant behavior; he's an upstanding custodian of the mantle of world champion.
Hans isn't at the 2800 level, but Magnus is almost 2900, and probably has good reason to be suspicious of someone playing way above their rating in tough matches.
What is GAIA ID?
They would ask the Beatles copyright owners to update their format if they posted an old 8 track or vinyl in to the music store though, right? Audio formats change, just at a more glacial pace than software dependencies. There is remastering and all that too.
The Gemini protocol is not a commercially-controlled HTTPS. Some folks like it better than HTTPS.

4.2 Server certificate validation

Clients can validate TLS connections however they like (including not at all) but the strongly RECOMMENDED approach is to implement a lightweight "TOFU" certificate-pinning system which treats self-signed certificates as first- class citizens. This greatly reduces TLS overhead on the network (only one cert needs to be sent, not a whole chain) and lowers the barrier to entry for setting up a Gemini site (no need to pay a CA or setup a Let's Encrypt cron job, just make a cert and go).

TOFU stands for "Trust On First Use" and is public-key security model similar to that used by OpenSSH. The first time a Gemini client connects to a server, it accepts whatever certificate it is presented. That certificate's fingerprint and expiry date are saved in a persistent database (like the .known_hosts file for SSH), associated with the server's hostname. On all subsequent connections to that hostname, the received certificate's fingerprint is computed and compared to the one in the database. If the certificate is not the one previously received, but the previous certificate's expiry date has not passed, the user is shown a warning, analogous to the one web browser users are shown when receiving a certificate without a signature chain leading to a trusted CA.

This model is by no means perfect, but it is not awful and is vastly superior to just accepting self-signed certificates unconditionally.
This title is the clickest of bait. In an exception to the "use the title from the article rule," I suggest retitling to something like "TechCrunch podcast interview with Michael Siebel" or something similar.
I’m surprised Gentoo hasn’t said this isn’t okay and cannot be called this for trademark infringement reasons.
Reference? Also if it’s end to end encrypted between two PM accounts, Anyone could have encrypted data.
From what I've read on this exact topic w.r.t. robotics, there are a few select places you could probably replace humans with a robot using current technology, and achieve almost perfect results. Kickers in American football, free throws in basketball are two such examples.
My company has opted not to have a CTO and instead have a CPO (Chief Product Officer) and the VP of Software is one of their reports. Honestly, I think it kinda makes sense. You're products are your products, not your tech stack.
Take a look at Jadelet. It also supports SVG.

https://github.com/STRd6/jadelet
With flags to recover the previous behavior, and the changes of which only broke code using non-public API surface, i.e.: code that should never have been using those APIs but which previously had no way to prevent usages.
This is more secure overall.

The problem with short sessions is that users who do not think about them sign in more often. This makes typing your credentials more normal and makes phishing attacks more common. Reducing the rate at which users enter credentials is generally a good thing.

Users who are thinking about having a short session know how to clear site history when they are done, or click "sign out".
Show HN: Nobara Project aims to make Fedora user friendly
> Isn't it mostly all a give and take?

Water. A slight increase in global temperature means more water sloshing around in the atmosphere. Of course "the weather" is partially a result of how that water is distributed around the world... but in conjunction with a more "dynamic" atmosphere, this can lead to things like: weather events occurring in places they usually don't or more severe weather events or stranger timing than usual.
I wonder if it’s a way for him to claim victory before ending the operation. Maybe it’s a way out.
No, it’s more like someone come to see you after a four hours exam while you are tired and want to go home and ask you how you did the very tricky and somewhat open question 4 while suggesting different approaches and asking for your opinion.

The quality of players post-game interview varies widely. Some clearly don’t put much thoughts into them because they would rather go home. Niemann is in good company here. That was nothing particularly exceptional.
I understand your frustration, also thank you for your work.

> The expectation that software libraries or frameworks should break every few months is disturbing.

As a library user, it's hard to find a good balance between fully trusting a system to stay alive for a while without maintenance, while being super paranoid about every aspect I rely on. Mentally it's easier to expect it to break every now and then, than to keep thinking "it's probably fine, but I still need to be defensive about stuff that never happen".

I think the issue on a library being "alive" or not is best mitigated by the users being comfortable to fix it if it broke under their use case. There's libraries I thought were completely dead but were a good shortcut to where we wanted to go, and we expected to extend it here and there anyway. That can't work for everything (thinking of security libs in particular, I wouldn't want to touch them) but it's to me the ideal situation, with no undue stress on the lib maintainer as well.
Chess has a rating system, and we know what the best humans rate out at compared to the best chess engines, and we know the likelihood of lower ranked players beating higher ranked ones, just depending on how much difference there is, and where in the ratings the two players are. Chess is not some video game one person perfected playing.
Scientists traced a new coronavirus lineage to one office – through sewage
> If libfoo 2.0 was released under an open source license, it remains so into the future.

I would trust that only if the copyright holder makes it clear that they are not revoking the license for libfoo 2.0, but that libfoo 2.0.1 will be under a different license.

If they indicate that they wish to revoke the license for previously released libfoo 2.0, it seems they have the right to do that; I don't want to be the one testing it in court.

I don't know about the details of the Solaris/Oracle situation, but I doubt it hinged around it simply not being possible to revert a license, as such.
Well, my interest is exactly to enter the password more often, so that I do not forget it.

Your reasoning is questionable. Fishing attacks more likely? Maybe yes, maybe no. I personally am very cautios of any login initiated from email and other messages.

I do not know how to clear site history (how?), and do not want whole history cleared; it is useful to have login names saved, for example. I only want an option to not keep the browser signed-in persistently.

Manual sign-out from every site I have in many browser tabs is not practically reliable.
"Is this you?" mode is (now) called Risk-based Authentication [1] [2] [3], although it's been around in various forms for over 15 years. It's an important part of defense-in-depth for user-facing application security. Without it, it would be much easier to attack the vast majority of user accounts, because most people are not as secure as you might be, and authentication methods and strengths/weaknesses vary.

[1] https://riskbasedauthentication.org/ [2] https://www.okta.com/identity-101/risk-based-authentication/ [3] https://www.beyondidentity.com/blog/what-risk-based-authenti...
What i did a couple of years algo is to approach a research lab of your interest, get in touch and try to get involved in a line of work of the lab, that usually means to work with some phd candidates, a postdoc or some junior researchers. If You stick around You should be on subject in a couple of months and ou can even get your name in some papel. You shouldn't be expecting the same involvment of a phd student, so you should keep showing up and trying to add value to the labs projects
As long as the new syntax generates an XML DOM, you should still be able apply any existing schemas to it.
Part of what makes iPhones great is that you aren’t running apps sitting on a pile of compatibility hacks. It was all designed to work correct on the exact device you use.
You can tell that 'gradians' (and 'decimal time') were created by the base-ten-obsessed French revolutionaries who brought us the metric system.
So don't allocate more land for housing. Require new housing to use land already used for homes. I.e. build more high-density homes
Granted, my post is a reference to history (the iron rule of oligarchy is well-documented... polemic tone aside hehehe). OP's post is speculative.
Use a password manager and you'll never have to remember it!
Hell Is a World in Which Everybody Writes Like Axios
I bet that humans at some point will discover thats actually false in the sense that the base 10 system is not completely arbitrary, and brains had an easier time evolving using the base 10 number systems (than say, base 7), and just like electricity flows through the path of least resistence even in other galaxies the same happens with how some areas of the brain evolve, that regardless of their origin they tend to use the base 10 system as well, with some minor differences.
And now we are all supposed to pretend like it never even happened.
Here's a better, more researched take that shows that the perceived advantage is more misunderstandings and misplaced media hype than an advantage.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ckrpVT5jS5Q
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KND8JCBtkbY
Light grey: Tupolev Tu-95 (bomber - Russia)

Red: Sukhoi Su-57 (fighter aircraft - Russia)

Dark grey: Bayraktar TB2 (Drone - Turkey)

Blue: Avangard (hypersonic glide vehicle - Russia)
As the agency that administers copywrite in the US, they can in fact do pretty much what they want to on the subject.
(Ditto developer here) Yes most definitely! We are rolling out a feature called Ditto Bus which lets you open reliable or lossy streams for arbitrary data flows between between your device and another in the mesh. Each stream flows over any transport available and will multihop via the most efficient path if needed. An early version of this is already available in the iOS SDK.

It's a powerful building block that can be used for proxying any kind of other traffic, either yourself as an app developer or if we end up providing proxy/VPN/other functionality as part of the Ditto SDK.
Six Shot technically had a "hidden 7th mode" in Japan, although you would be forgiven for not being impressed.

https://tfwiki.net/wiki/Ultra_Magnus_Dies!!
Since it is Chromium, and completely open-source, and also respects privacy more than Chrome or Edge or any other proprietary browser?
Because the LoC can't just commandeer the book you just wrote or the film you just made and release it for anyone to see for free.
Link to the app’s website: https://www.overdrive.com/apps/libby
Isn’t this just changing units to suit your purpose?

Same way we might use electron volts rather than volts to make the equations nice.
Given how the internet was reacting to Magnus allegations at the time, I marvel that the kid managed to actually finish the tournament without entirely crumbling. The amount of abuse being thrown at Niemann is nothing short of frightening.
Thanks for the info. Can you suggest something I can read that summarizes Mozilla’s mistakes?
This is a great idea and something I would love to use, but it's a lot less docker compatible and user friendly than it may seem.

For instance there is no way to automatically run the image's specified command, effectively leaving you with a dead VM: https://github.com/weaveworks/ignite/issues/874. You also simply can not share directories with the host (out of scope for Firecracker).

microVMs for running containers are definitely a great idea; another project aiming to do it (a little differently) is Kata Containers. It has a lot more industry support, can also run on Firecracker (though QEMU microVMs are just as good) and can (theoretically, I haven't gotten it to work) interact with many container runtimes that are not Docker (the focus appears to be on Kubernetes).

While more powerful, Kata Containers are also much, much more complicated (and honestly under- and misleadingly documented). Ignite could fill the role of something simpler and more easy to get started with. But please, if you aim to attract Docker users, actually make it compatible with Docker principles.

There's still a lot of unused potential in containers as VMs; Kata+Kubernetes probably currently realizes the most of it.