skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Respecting privacy.

Firefox these days includes a number of features which threaten user's privacy that must be disabled. Their biggest sins I think were forcing Pocket onto people by default, their new tab page, searching from the address bar, and prefetch.
I think a better way to go about it is to state your own goals. If you want it to bridge it to ZeroMQ, you can evaluate the program and see if the way it is coded fits you. If you want another service, you evaluate how much work to retrofit it. As longs as you expect decades out of your software, you should prepare to own all your dependencies. The intention of the original developer does not matter that much.
This is like the 15th post on the topic today. Please, if you're wondering why some hot bit of news isn't on HN, use the search box at the bottom of the page and you'll often find it came and went much earlier.
Can be, in principle, but uniformly are not.
I have nothing like that on hand, sadly. I was there to see it, so I haven't had a need for a chronicle of sorts.
Evaluating New Tools
He must have changed his password ;)
I don't know much about Italian government, but unless there's some fundamental difference between them and the US, I don't see any chance of a government showing restraint and staying in power, when the other guys could deliver prosperity without the bill coming due for 10+ years.

What am I missing?
Freq/Power will be linear to a point, it's possible the point differs on different processors but maybe not.
You're going to need calculus if you want to work with PID control systems or audio/signal processing
That's what version pinning and semver is for. If I install 1.2.3 in 2018, and the software is now 4.5.6, I don't expect it to work without updates.

In regards to the second case, bet that's Python with the wheels situation, where it doesn't fallback to building from source by default for some reason (instead throwing a super obtuse error), at least with Poetry.
Arxiv link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.13268
I use Pug for markup in my Svelte + TS projects and I adore it: https://github.com/pugjs/pug
This is such a good point. And doing this right can result in the technical leader feeling like they aren't providing value, especially if they are used to being great at solving technical problems themselves in the past. The manager dopamine loop is much longer and can at times not exist at all and you are still doing it right. I can see that it might be very tempting to try to get the feeling of accomplishment my stealing it from folks by disempowering them.
Please post your home address so that I can respond to your comment by writing on a brick and throwing it through your window. Since that is speech, it must enjoy the same protection.
You don't need to close <p> tag, it closes automatically.

Also supporting something as simple as </> (close current tag) would significantly reduce HTML boilerplate without inventing new language. I agree that shortcuts for id and class are nice too.

My proposal:

<div.content>
<form#login>
<input name=username>
<input name=password>
</>
</>
I agree with you, but I'll point out that there are a lot of voices today arguing to tax stocks, crypto, and other property the way stock options are today (eg. wealth tax; tax on crypto->crypto exchanges; proposed tax on unrealized capital gains). The idea that your wealth can increase without you being taxed on it seems to be very unpopular with the general population. Come to think of it, I wonder if the reason for taxing stock options the way they are is because otherwise there'd be a strong incentive to pay in stock rather than cash, and then everyone would be paying capital gains taxes instead of income, and then there'd be a strong call to tax capital gains at the same rates as income and the wealthy & powerful would not enjoy that.
> I take it you would take offence if I ate your kids, though?

Uhhh what? like... Is that a threat? Are you a cow? did I eat your kids? Are you planning to? Do you mean like sperm? are you coming on to me? Do you mean in a plane crash where you had to eat each other to survive... in which case, yeah, I'd probably feel bad about the whole thing clearly. Or maybe I'd have to call the cops... or for a reservation IDK.

> This is mostly a myth, by the way. Reading up on nutrients and where to get them can get you a long way. You don’t need „animals“, you need a mix of different nutrients and you can absolutely get those from a variety of sources. Meat contains plenty easy energy, but just because it’s easy doesn’t mean that’s the only way.

Mostly is key here, if its an unavoidable eventuality, then you can't treat it as a spectrum. This is a binary thing, its either a myth or it isn't. You will have to take supplements.

> Have you ever seen the movie Soylent Green? The protagonist learns the cheap food their whole society is nurtured with is actually made from deceased people. They are horrified by it, and obviously wouldn’t consider eating it again.

I have not seen the movie soylent green, and yes, morality is key here, morality can be made and unmade as society wishes. Would I eat a dog or a live octopus? no. But if I was born in a society where that was acceptable I would. the fact that the people were horrified was a failure of that society itself, they should have been educated from the start about it.

> Please don’t immediately dismiss this: It really feels similar to really understand what it means that your food had dreams, hopes, and feelings. This isn’t just some fancy lifestyle change, but a shift in moral values.

What dreams does a fish dream of? swimming? what has value here? anything thinking? should we try creating braindead animals? would you eat nonthinking meat? if we're talking movies and hypothethicals, would you be okay via removing the animals brain and it being kept alive in some sort of matrix?

> You know, I’m well aware I need carbon from somewhere, something has to die so I can live. But that doesn’t mean I can’t try to reduce suffering of others just for my pleasure.

Speaking of buddhism, life is suffering, and it seems to me that if you want to remove suffering, then death is by far the only solution.

With all that said, most counterarguments here were mostly trollish, and thanks, I'll probably read up on hindu recipes... though I doubt I have any of the spices.
Love go as a platform.. self contained binaries have been a miracle for ops..but have a few big hangups about using the language full time because of the sucky ergonomics.

* No optional/named parameters. Writing a whole function per parameter for function chaining is excessive. This would not be difficult to add to the compiler (i've done it and have seriously considered using the fork) but it seems like the team is just stubborn about adding stuff like this.

* No default struct values. 0 isn't good enough in real world scenarios.. have fun writing BlahInit(...) for everything.

* Would be nice to get the question mark syntax for error handling. Error handling shorthand for if err != nil would also be very welcome.
The first paragraph was mostly facetious.

The second merely suggests an unusually clever, yet plausible methodology.
We had a serendipitous confluence of Lisp/Scheme fans at the company.

My boss had worked at Symbolics Japan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DTjrY1LXrk

I was a Lisp fan from my days of hacking on Symbolics at the Media Lab: https://kaveh808.medium.com/late-night-lisp-machine-hacking-...

And one of our developers was a Lisp programmer who had implemented his own version of Scheme: http://practical-scheme.net/gauche/
You shouldn't use a website builder
That man deserves a medal for keeping that 1993 Geo Metro going.
I was just thinking.

Somebody born in the 1870s and who went on to live for a 100 years would have seen:

- people going around on horses and donkeys with carriages and everything getting replaced by motor cars

- invention of aircraft, jetplanes, and even supersonic aircrafts that obsoleted ocean-liners

- moon landing

- two world wars

- decline of the British Empire

- telephones

- computers

- germ theory

It's too much.

I wonder what the world would be like if I survive till the later parts of this century.
> This has been found across every single study of the industry.

Would be highly interested in a link to one of these. Specifically one that directly tackles the “less pay for the same job with the same hours” issue.
Thanks for the reply.

> It's often cheaper and faster to increase the instance storage than move to EBS, prioritized or not.

You're saying it may well be cheaper to increase storage in order to get more IOPS than moving to an EBS-optimized instance type?

Regarding HA, not relevant for at this point (assuming I understood you correctly). We've only got a single primary and one replica, the latter being used primarily for analytics.
"Chief"(C) of any company deals with people and planning not the direct expertise for that area of the company. A Chief Marketing Officer does not have to be a master in advertisement but the person needs to be a master at dealing with people, get the information needed to make a decision and make a decision. The person also needs to develop a strategy to execute on the CEO's vision. You can say the same thing about the CTO. The last thing you want is an expert Techie in that role. The Chief needs to put the right people in place and trust them to do their job. If the team is not working then the Chief needs to figure out why. The Chief needs to have a director and senior managers that will have expertise to do the work.

A small company needs an expert tech but that role is really a director or senior manager that gets the title as CTO as an ego boost when in reality it is the role of a senior manager or a director.

If your company is small a CTO title is a misnomer. It's important to point out that a CTO's role will change depending on the company's size.
He has been caught of cheating online. Where you just open a new window and follow engine moves. Or you have a friend sitting beside you giving engine moves.

In his over-the-board match, he didn't have a laptop. He didn't have a friend giving him moves. He didn't have any communication device. He was mostly looking at the board or into the distance while he was playing. He was scanned with a metal detector. So we know he definitely didn't use any of his earlier methods of cheating if he even did cheat. Carlsen's statement confirms that his preparation wasn't leaked or hacked. I count these as evidence of him not cheating with his usual MO.

But in your analogy, it's completely possible for the guy to have used his usual MO to steal the new shiny car.

Now of course I'm not saying he didn't cheat. It's possible he used some other sophisticated method of cheating. But it would not be natural for a reasonable person to assume that theft using his usual MO is the most likely explanation.
Not exactly. Chess GMs have a somewhat "over-fitted gut." On studies done on their memory, they could routinely recall a chess board after seeing that board for only a few moments provided that the layout the pieces could be reached in a regular game. When the board was laid out in an unlikely manner, they performed no better than the control group.[1]

Let's say you arrive home with your 2y/o child and are greeted with dog shit on the floor. If I asked the 2y/o who shat on the floor they wouldn't be able to answer, but you could easily deduce that the dog did it. Why? Because you have an immense bank of experience concerning everyday causality that the 2y/o doesn't have.

Magnus has a bank of human chess moves in his mind, that we don't. He knows that the dog shat on the floor.

And keep in mind that Magnus has not thrown this accusation around in the past, even in the face of defeat.

[1]: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/brain-study-shows...
Elo assumes that performance across n^2 players fits the logistic curve model of n players. There is no reason to believe that assumption is remotely accurate and that Elo would ever stabilize. Players often avoid playing lower rated players, for this reason.
If he's that smart, he should be more than capable of developing a number of other livelihoods - not the least of which could be coaching.
Just stop. We don't even have to consider the unlimited public liability, submitting to geopolitical domination, giving monopoly power over the economy to a handful of fuel prpviders and existential threats anymore because nuclear reactors are so bad that subsidized ones cannot even compete against renewables at high latitudes.

For the build price of 1 watt of nuclear plant which will be at best 90% available (but more likely 60-80) you can get a solar/wind mix at retail micro generation prices further from the equator than 90% of the population with zero hours of producing less than 1 watt (much of which is dispatchable too) and 1 additional net watt of variable energy. Allow for the same availability as a nuclear reactor and the price is a fraction. Then for just the running costs of an already built nuclear you can pay the whole thing off before the reactor even opens. Give it five years and the LCOE of solar will be less than the fuel costs.

The solution was to stop wasting billions on nuclear and subsidizing fossil fuels and actually invest in renewable tech half a century ago.

Solar energy density is such that just covering structures and open paved areas in any region with less than 10k people per km^2 can cover average primary energy (not just electricity). It's far less than cattle grazing land or land used for fuel ethanol to greenwash the auto industry. The land use is a complete non-issue.
There is a fair argument to be made that most of the "problem" concerning the environment is a problem specifically /for humanity/. The planet, and likely most of our peers on the planet, don't care.

So yes, an El Nino is "supposed" to be <here> /for us/, but an El Nino is only "expected" or "just so happened to always be" <here> for the planet at large.

It's a question of what perspective is used.
Elo is not an acronym.
From https://firecracker-microvm.github.io/:

Firecracker is an alternative to QEMU that is purpose-built for running serverless
functions and containers safely and efficiently, and nothing more. Firecracker is
written in Rust, provides a minimal required device model to the guest operating
system while excluding non-essential functionality (only 5 emulated devices are
available: virtio-net, virtio-block, virtio-vsock, serial console, and a minimal
keyboard controller used only to stop the microVM). This, along with a streamlined
kernel loading process enables a < 125 ms startup time and a < 5 MiB memory
footprint.

Basically they removed anything that wasn't needed to run a Lambda. All your I/O, CPU, memory, etc are all going to be limited to one very simplistic implementation, in addition to whatever KVM exports. So rather than saying "what does it limit", it's more like "imagine anything that might take advantage of/depend on hardware, or even host<->guest or guest<->guest, and just forget about it".
I've actually quit jobs because of this, so your employees actually don't have to put with toxic management.
Gnome Builder 4
Three men charged with fraud in $100M New Jersey deli scheme
That's not a good reason to start a war. The Iraq War (2003, not the Gulf War of the 90s) had widespread public support because the CIA fabricated evidence of WMDs to create that support.
In general, does anyone know what protocol they're using to transfer large amounts of data back to earth? I'm wondering especially about error detection and correction.
A DVD player was a major selling point for some people when they bought the PS2. For others, myself included, it was the blue LED.
Have been watching this for a bit. I feel like this is a few tweaks away from a breakthrough. Excited to follow the progress
https://youtu.be/TG15s3Brbrw
I can identify with this article. It also reminded me of this post from last month which did a deep dive into shame (and how it’s different than guilt). It’s a long read but worth it:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32497194

I am in healthcare and never wanted to be in administration. For complicated reasons, I keep getting more leadership responsibilities even though I typically think of myself as conflict avoidant. I do pride myself as being a role model for helping people and “taking the extra step” to help people when it may be something others would delegate. I think in my case it more has to due with lack of competition and such but I definitely fit the bill for someone who feels guilt. I can see also how guilt that is felt with respect to the entire group can lead to decisions that are better for the group (but may cost an individual more).
HTTP manages this pretty well. It's pretty common practice to turn off old http and TLS versions and things move along fine because the vast majority of users are on the latest version.
AMD compatibility (via ROCM) for Tensorflow and PyTorch are perfectly workable (albeit a little finicky on old AMD cards). Stories of AMD's ML demise are greatly exaggerated.
BTW I'm French and I'm used to this kind of rhetoric. Every time there's a demonstration (and we do a lot of them) the newspaper and "the other side" will use the minority of distractor to discredit the movement. It's so common I wish there was a name for this strategy. Perhaps we should call that a "misrepresenting minority fallacy".
Putt's law:

Technology is dominated by two types of people, those who understand what they do not manage and those who manage what they do not understand.

https://github.com/dwmkerr/hacker-laws#putts-law

The underlying reason for Putt's law is the finite space of the human cranium and finite hours in the day.
> This is approximately the same situation as with v8 isolates, except that we have reasons to believe that WASM has a more trustworthy and coherent design than v8 isolates, so we're not worried about things like memory corruption breaking boundaries between cotenant WASM programs running in the same process

My understanding is that WASM's spec isn't just more coherent than JavaScript's, but also orders of magnitude smaller, which means less surface-area to check for vulnerabilities
Theres a reason why Oracle is still a dominant “legacy” database.
Indeed. It stands for Extra-acronymic Language Object.
lol can't believe I fell for that one. Thanks!
Even on my tiny island of Puerto Rico there’s plenty of undeveloped land. Call me skeptical. Perhaps it’s just there isn’t land where people want to live badly
Direct link to .PNG:

https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/pe...
Why do post mortems happen for production issues, when you could just open up "git blame?"

Are you lying to the team when you say, "we're not sure how this happened" rather than just quoting the git blame?

Well, no. The problem is much more complicated than a buggy commit. It's a wider problem with the system. So you say "we don't know, we have to look more into it" and do a post mortem because that is the honest truth.

The same principle applies here. So-and-so highly respected person committed a real-life communication bug that got merged into this IC's production career. But the problem is much more complicated than that. You don't know what the actual problem is until you address it with the leadership team.
If you produce a static binary and can copy it to the server, sure, Docker might be overkill. But how do you reproduce an ensemble of services and their exact version in prod environment? Even just having a stable dev environment by using Docker images with fixed version for database and other auxiliary services is very valuable.
There is a ton of federal land west of Colorado. This seems like an artificial problem more than anything.
Thanks. If I'm reading this https://ibb.co/bNGmrCB correctly, it seems like we have plenty burst balance. Does this seem to indicate that provisioned IOPS is unlikely to help us here?
NASA’s Mission Hits Asteroid in First-Ever Planetary Defense Test
Why is it atrocious? From a user’s perspective it’s simple and friendly: you click log out and you’re logged out of everything.
What a program does at the moment is exactly what it should do, unless there's a bug report filed, or the current developers want it to do something else.

Whatever it was originally meant to do is probably either obsolete, or well known to all users, if it's been so long the original devs left.

If it's got ZeroMQ, and has for 5 years, one can probably assume someone will be upset if it suddenly does not have ZeroMQ.

Regardless of intent, for practical purposes, if people are using it, they probably want that to stay around until you do an orderly transition to some other thing.
Yes, TypeScript can get very complex too. But there is little overlap in the complexity of TypeScript, which mostly comes from learning how to program within the structural type system; and Rust which is about memory management without a GC.

Rust and C++ are like Hebrew and Arabic. Difficult languages for an outsider, but if you speak one you have a significant head start towards learning the other. TypeScript is Japanese: knowing Japanese doesn’t help you speak Arabic, despite both being difficult.
Great reason not to choose nuclear then.

Renewables are more reliable. $10 will get you one watt of nuclear which will be off 10-40% of the time. $10 of solar + wind + storage will get you at least 1 watt every hour of the year in and at least 1W of variable power even in Germany or Canada at any scale from micro generation to 100s of MW.
Damn, this is going to eat the world. Docker but with full host isolation making it suitable for untrusted workloads, hot damn. This could for real make fully managed multi-tenant completely serverless k8s possible once it gets to the point where it can be used as a containerd and CRI implementation.
Nicer than .net core?
This is a last-ditch attempt to keep the original MuleSoft product relevant. DataWeave is XSLT with shittier tooling. Take a look at Stylus Studio's XSLT mapper and compare it with the mapping functions of Studio. Oracle did this 20 years ago.

https://www.stylusstudio.com/images/screenshots/xslt_functio...

It's 1-1.

Anyone who's used this knows there's much better options for this tooling native to actual programming languages, or datatype specific tooling (eg XPath visualizers). Let's face it, 99% of the work isn't the actual mapping of data, it's building out the definitions and understanding which definition from source to target needs to be mapped.

This tooling doesn't address that problem.

I'd pick VS Code, Visual Studio or JetBrains "code previews" (where it auto-compiles and gives you expected outputs of variables as you write it) over some bespoke data mapping language any day. You can't hire developers to understand and build these mappings, you're better off hiring developers who understand literally ANY programming language.

And don't get me started on performance. Tuning this is impossible outside of throwing more CPU at the problem.

Also.. If it's open, where is it?
This site is very unusual for climate or weather communication, and albeit interesting, it does not manage to bring a clear message to their audience.
ABAP is used in the ERP systems domain. Once you try to do things outside of those abstractions it becomes difficult or even impossible. This is what basically suffocated the 4GLs of the 1990s. They were too constrained and at the edges problems tend to require unanticipated functionality.

It is the non-functional requirements that cause the most implementation problems.
If you can remember it then it’s probably not a very secure password.
Depending on how you feel about it you could update the readme every so often with:
[date] Checked project, still is ok in current form.
Well it sure has generated a lot of attention...
Good whiteboard interviewers will happily stipulate that something like the thing you can't remember the name of definitely exists and you can call it whatever you want in your solution.
Little snitch is top notch software. Can’t recommend enough.
You have the choice of which tournaments to play in though.