skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Not sure if you had any setup issues, but Jetbrains IDEs have been just as great on Mac OS as on Windows or Linux. In some ways, they were even better vs Windows/Linux because of the better font rendering as a result of Retina + the high resolution displays.
The only change I had to make was the set the keymap to classic(was used the classic layout on Windows).
Everything else worked just great.

On the contrary, XCode seemed to be incredibly feature crippled and going backwards (in terms of how they have a counter-intuitive design for the average developer). If It wasn't for the iOS work I had to do, I would have never even opened that IDE for a second time. I hated how Apple forced us to stick to Xcode and change our orientations and get used to their IDE, without leaving a second option...... until AppCode finally arrived.
This is the best thing that happened to iOS development. Similar to Android finally partnering with Jetbrains to get out the Android Studio.

Long live Jetbrains.
Just putting stuff in landfills results in methane production, which would gradually leak out and cause even more global warming than CO2. You‘d need to invest in making things air tight, ideally over hundreds of years.
Why no stationary base on the moon?
I think this is happening. Except, instead of two separate meters they are instead installing "smart meters" which can do this and much more.
This is often true for SPEC, but not true for real world code.

Or at least, we extensively tested this at Google, before, during, and after the move to LLVM.

On many thousands of libraries, binaries, etc, made up of hundreds of millions of lines of C++.

While there were wins and losses, on average, LLVM was a consistent net positive.

That was true despite having spent 5+ years of having a large team dedicated to doing nothing but finding places to improve performance of GCC compiled code (and contributing back patches), and doing so very successfully.

That said, as time approaches infinity, the compilers are going to generate the best code for the things that someone took the time to analyze and make the compiler better at.

There is, in the end, no magic that makes GCC better than LLVM or vice versa. The vast majority of it is tuning and improving things little by little for whatever targets someone is trying to improve.
Did Schopenhauer go on to give any reasons to believe that the things he was claiming there are true?
For a moment I read this as WordPerfect WASM and thought it a great way to preserve old but gold software in usable state.
That you're talking about 4 and 6 years as a long time demonstrates just how normalized the horribly wasteful consumer electronics market has become. The receiver I'm listening to music with is three decades old. Car is over a decade, and I don't consider it old. Washer and dryer 10-20? Yes there is progress in technology that makes new things more efficient (a class D amp would be more efficient than AB, heat pumps better than resistive, etc), but the mobile phone market is certainly not the PC market we experienced from 8088->x86_64 either. Most of the "innovation" driving incompatibilities and obsolescence has been basic software churn.
Someday aliens will land and all will be fine until we explain our calendar
From the 2022-07-25 minutes, they discussed that the store is losing money. They decided to transfer money from sewer & equipment funds to it. They also decided to lower prices.

https://erieks.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/JULY25MINUTES....

I'm wondering why the city council is making such decisions. Do they have experience running grocery stores? Perhaps they cannot hire a capable manager to set prices and make the store break-even? They should consult someone with experience on the matter. The previous owners would probably be willing to give advice.

From the 2022-06-27 minutes, the council approved a request to use the store's freezer for a city event. The store's manager said they needed council approval. I think the council is micro-managing the store without competence in retail management. The store manager doesn't have authority to run the store. This is probably the root cause of the store's financial troubles.

https://erieks.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/JUNE27MINUTES....
I find it unlikely that people who pay for technical books were ever going to be your customers. There could be other explanations - maybe once people could flip through your book without paying for it they realized there wasn't any value there for them? Maybe you had sales for a while and then they dropped off like sales do.

I don't think people have the right to spread work that isn't theirs, but i also don't think you can assume the book will always make the same amount of money, or that book pirates were ever your customers.
Copying a file doesn't hurt anyone.
Definitely - some of the Arab countries - Qatar, Kuwait, the UAE.
Who ? Poettering?
Your model exists, it's called royalroad.com coupled with patreon and kindle unlimited. But it's fairly genre specific to Fantasy.

But, it's not a model that really supports high standards, you get typo's, grammar errors, bad prose and quite a lot of filler pages due to the pressure of maintaining the 5 x 1500+ words per week many of the most popular authors work too.
Would that actually work as a safeguard against this? What you're reverting and unsetting to is the very defaults we're talking about changing.
Here are some counterpoints:

https://www.chemistryworld.com/opinion/why-alphafold-wont-re...
Can you elaborate? E.g.,

> - Writers and editors should be paid according to the popularity of their work.

By whom?
According to the Google Inactive Account support page, they aren't actually assuming the account, they're just getting access to the data. So, presumably, they'd just download the data and that would be it.

https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/3036546?hl=en

(That's not to say there aren't other concerning reasons why that data may not be accessible.)
I agree that this is a huge problem to be solved, but I don’t think it excuses piracy in any way.

On another note, one emerging new framework is patreon. Instead of paying for printing/distribution, you’re paying the author directly to continue writing.
> Once upon a time I was homeless, and everything I owned needed to fit into a normal-size collegiate backpack, or I couldn't keep it.

> Fast-forward 20 years; retaining my packrat qualities,

Sorry, you're the opposite of a packrat. A packrat carries all the stuff it finds home.

Things currently deposited under our deck by a packrat: a flip flop, 4 fluffy dog toys, 2 treat bones, tennis ball, plastic bottle, foil wrapper, twigs, dog poop, pine needles, ...
I don’t know about “vertical”, but the pitch-up theory is the NTSB’s own, not the sole assumption of the person you’re responding to.
You could design a pricing scheme that takes this into account:

- Make it for all energy use, not just electricity

- Give an extra allowance for electric car owners
Iranian government has a history of bloody crackdown. Enough is enough. There has been no free and fair election in the past decades so this government doesn't represent the people. I am worried this tyrannical government succeeds in putting down this movement and then the western governments sign another nuclear treaty which means sanction relief and more money for the regime that doesn't represent the people. The west should recognize that this government is a dictatorship and is not afraid of using any means including live bullets to put down protests.
But there is no wage inflation overall. In real terms, wages are declining except for maybe the lowest earners [0]. For some reason that's unacceptable.

[0] https://www.americanprogress.org/article/wages-and-employmen...
LOL, I just deleted my sibling reply... you put it so much better than I could.
Well, let's go back to worshipping the sun, then. Who knows, if we don't, it might not rise tomorrow...

Or, just maybe, progress itself is a tradition that deserves its own reverence. Sometimes, Chesterson's fence was erected by a shepherd who no longer uses the field that you'd rather play soccer on. It was useful in its day, but no longer.
Because not all entertainment is equally interesting to you.

The next book never written could have been your favorite book. Or game or movie or show or entertainer or content creator. With zero substitutes.

“I don’t care about future things because someone already was paid for making content that I can enjoy today” seems like a basic logical error.
I don't often say this, but you're wrong and what you're saying shows a massive misunderstanding of fitness, metabolic process and goes in the face of everything we know about our physical makeup:

"Run. Run hard. Run fast. Run until you can't run any longer, and discover and accept physical limitations and push against them if your drive is unsatisfied"

This is just daft. Eliud Kipchoge, and most other runners very rarely hit their absolute physical limit (during training) and usually only hit it during a race if they did something wrong.

Your VO2 limit is not something you want to slam up against very often and doesn't represent anything other than how fast you can process oxygen directly (at the max point). Much more important to fitness is glycogen use efficiency and cell respiration. You don't improve these elements of your fitness (and they're the ones that count) by "Running fast until you can't run any longer". The opposite infact, you train them by doing long-duration low HR/VO2 activities.

In short, you don't know what you're banging on about, so are hardly in a position to be critical of how other people use digital devices when you don't know the first thing about human physiology in exercise.
Huh, spam bots are getting better every day. That's a good book suggestion.
I think even if he fails to implement a better, more balanced political system, it's still really good that they promote all these as good things. It contrasts with Russian official's rhetoric who give people bs about Russia's own special way with no democracy.
The software may misclassify them as voting ring, or sockpuppets or shills or whaterver and still ban them. I'm not sure if there is an internal classification, because the details have never been published because they are part of the secret sauce.

Users may notice and then flag and/or email the mods.

Also, if the new users make a lot of silly comments like

> This is great! Is the best post/app I've ever seen!!!

it will increase the chance of making people angry and flagging the post.
The price of a phone is paid when you buy the phone. That's when and where the transaction happens.

If that transaction doesn't happen, then none of the other things you mentioned get funded.

You can't get the phone without a transaction happening. It's a physical object, so moving it has a distribution cost.

You can get the contents of a book without doing a transaction. You can share the contents of a book just as freely as I'm sharing this comment.

Because there isn't a transaction happening, there is no source of income. There is no time or place to ask readers for money. Money isn't even involved in the first place; neither are goods or services - apart from a trivial amount of bandwidth.

Treating arts like they are singular objects to be made only once (or services to be performed once) doesn't work anymore. Now they are instances. They can be recreated or performed for free. By anyone. Anywhere. At any time. Without anyone else watching.

You simply can't hijack every instantiation to involve a transaction. You can never stop the signal.
Say there are two people with same understanding of a nuanced argument. One fails to articulate that argument in a written form such that the reader is able to understand it. The other is successful in doing that. I'll say the second person is a better writer. No marketing involved.
It would be pointless for Russia to rest their hopes on Italy to break NATO and EU unity - Meloni got fiercely pro-USA recently, and unless a miracle happens, Salvini is heading towards a total defeat tonight and is all but finished, same goes for Berlusconi.

Also, it would be pointless for Italy to go against Europe just to get more Russian gas - because in all likelihood it would never happen in the first place. Russia can tempt Germany to leave Ukraine in the dust and open North Stream 2, but Italy gets its Russian gas through a pipeline that goes through Ukraine, Austria and Slovenia - anyone but a fool would think that the Ukranians would let the Italians get away with that. Ukraine can cut Italy's supply in an instant if they want.

Italy needs LNG regasification capacity, and it needs it now. The only way to get it if FSRUs don't go online in the next few months is through the existing pipeline from the Netherlands.
The whole point of Apollo 10 was to be the dry run for Apollo 11.

Doing all of that with no actual plans to land seems silly.
Read anything about mysticism and see why that’s a lazy person definition. In any case, the term is not appropriate as a description of “appeal to authority.”

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mysticism/
Making fake tapes creates additional risk of cover up discovery.

The best cover up involves the least lies.
But the claim in the suit isn't that the missile was fired from any ship, but from a land base in New Jersey.

Navy ships compatible with these systems were still 5 years out...

If you're referring to the naval radar scans, only the people present on the bridge (and really only a handful of those...) would need to participate in any coverup, and that's only if the official account differs significantly from what was recorded. If the official explanation is plausible enough based on the data, which it seems to be, then you don't need any participation from the ship at all.
> Animals are not exploited for food, animals are food, you are also food.

I take it you would take offence if I ate your kids, though?

> You do need to eat animals to live. You can live without, but you have to take supplements. because again, you need to eat animals to live.

This is mostly a myth, by the way. Reading up on nutrients and where to get them can get you a long way. You don’t need „animals“, you need a mix of different nutrients and you can absolutely get those from a variety of sources. Meat contains plenty easy energy, but just because it’s easy doesn’t mean that’s the only way.

> for vegetarians/vegans you are either in, or you are morally bankrupt. It reminds me a lot of religions/cults shaming.

Have you ever seen the movie Soylent Green? The protagonist learns the cheap food their whole society is nurtured with is actually made from deceased people. They are horrified by it, and obviously wouldn’t consider eating it again. Please don’t immediately dismiss this: It really feels similar to really understand what it means that your food had dreams, hopes, and feelings. This isn’t just some fancy lifestyle change, but a shift in moral values.

> prove to me in 500 years that humans don't need to eat meat and I'll believe you, we'll both be dead. but I'll believe you then.

I mean, it’s not like a vegetarian diet is new or something? There are many cultures that did, and continue to, eat pretty much exclusively vegetarian. Just ask a Hindu or a Buddhist…

> It's not like plants are not completely unsentient either, they have defenses (an aspect of organisms that don't want to die), they do chase water (thirst).

They don’t have a central nervous system however, or pain receptors, or even a brain, for what it’s worth. So, by all practical means, they don’t feel pain, or experience being alive as we do.

You know, I’m well aware I need carbon from somewhere, something has to die so I can live. But that doesn’t mean I can’t try to reduce suffering of others just for my pleasure.

Maybe enjoying cooking really helps, though. I can conjure up a lot of tasty stuff that just works well without meat, so it’s not like I’d miss anything.
You could have tarrif rules that the essential meter charges at the regular rate if the regular meter is energized, or near the regular rate. That would have the benefit of letting the power utility accurately forecast the essential load, and would disincentivize the transfer switches.
I’d guess the biggest risk increase is from having a heart that needs a pacemaker in the first place.

The pacemaker itself probably isn’t designed for lightning strikes, but it probably is designed to survive hits from a defibrillator. I’d put money on a pacemaker/ICD surviving a lightning strike.
> It seems you agree that 'essential' loads have much more value to you and others, but you're not willing to pay the value?

In a similar sense that I'm not willing to pay more for "essential" food than for luxury food; or in the same sense that it seems unfair to have to pay for life-saving medical treatments.

It is both unethical and pointless to exploit inelastic demand — the whole meaning of the word "inelastic" being that changing the price of it won't incentivize people to use any more/less of it.

Inelastic demand should, at the very least, be subsidized. This is why public healthcare exists; why food stamps exist; etc. But better yet, inelastic demand — because it is so predictable — should be optimized heavily for by suppliers (for power plants, this is "building out base-load capacity") such that economies of scale enable the supply for inelastic demand to be satisfied with lower cost than the supply for elastic demand.
> It seems you agree that 'essential' loads have much more value to you and others, but you're not willing to pay the value?

what does taking what i wrote, then reworking the sentence to suit your purpose serve?

I did not agree that essential loads have more "value"... you did.

If you think that heating your home is not essential, come by in the winter and i can put a tent in the back yard for you. It reaches as low as -24C, but i'm sure you will be fine.

If you think that people should be forced to pay more to heat their homes.. you are mistaken. No one should have to choose between food and heat and any program structured such that "essential costs more" will NEVER work.

I said that it is UNFAIR to charge more for essential loads, and that if a program depends on "rebates" it is flawed.

There are many other alternative solutions, such as what we have here via "time of use" billing that is also seasonally adjusted.

this "pay more for essential services" logic is severely flawed, much as you twisting my words to suit your purpose was.

the persons below really made the point when they wrote "It is both unethical and pointless to exploit inelastic demand "

what you are proposing is unethical...
Then please explain how CarPlay will display live vehicle metrics and basically act like Tesla‘s center display (control climate etc) https://www.macrumors.com/2022/06/06/apple-announces-multi-d...
We're not doing this for money, but we would love to quit our jobs in finance and tech, and work on this full time.

Are they actually being paid for work in finance and tech? Can that be open sourced? In the name of ethical purity, will they only be accepting funds from work that is arranging physical objects like laying bricks, plumbing, carpentry, etc.?
If you are legally intending to fire a missile, but not intending to hit a plane, what else would it be?
Yes, but very few people can afford to write full-time without getting paid for it. The money isn't the deciding factor between writing vs not writing. It's the deciding factor between writing 40 hours a week vs 5 hours a week after doing their day job.
I was planning to make a snarky comment here as follows: Ah yes, thisxdoesnotexist.com, let's repeat the fad from a few years ago when StyleGAN 1/2 was all the rage but has been widely outdated since. Still, it can come in useful when giving an AI talk to completely unsuspecting managers.

Though I was pleasantly surprised https://www.derekau.net/this-vessel-does-not-exist at least had been updating their approach, up to DALL-E 2 even. Not yet Stable Diffusion but I do applaud the effort.

(In all seriousness: just goes to show how quick things evolve in this space.)
Your math was still off, 200 amps at 220v three-phase is ~76.2 kW.

200*220*sqrt(3)=76210 watts
> If you give me a lump of coal you give me power.

Did you mean energy here?
That guy who is really organised, isn't degrading his organisational skills by using a calendar.

Get a grip jeez.
I really like tutanota been a great service, I turned off sending encrypted emails. But like the fact my email is encrypted in there servers. Also like they give you 1GB but since they compress emails its like 10GB. I also believe in giving back so i upgraded.
Just you’re sitting there reading, on your phone, TV, whatever and baby is on top of you napping.
Why would a society that is almost completely white reflect a new group of immigrants. And you obviously know that Muslim men aren’t Limiting their children’s educations and integration until the bus driver is brown. What is your motivation for lying?
> No, it doesn't. They'd love to be able to say that. The reason they don't say it loudly and clearly is because it's not true.

You sound like a conspiracy theorist. The people writing these documents are engineers working at a public company, not members of a secret group trying to wash your brain.

All the data they quote can be cross-examined. It doesn't require belief to make one's mind up.

> France is going to struggle to keep 50% of their power nuclear even with a will to try.

I don't really see how that's related to the load-following ability of nuclear plants.
The StrongARM was a DEC-designed offshoot of ARM which (amongst other things) traded off some of the low power consumption of ARM for greater performance. The last-generation Acorn computer (the RiscPC) had swappable processor cards and Acorn more-or-less force-fit the SA110 into the last generation of RiscPCs because it was so much faster than the ARM8 that was in the roadmap. There were a bunch of software incompatibilities, partly because it used a different ISA (ARM v4 instead of the v3 used by the CPUs on the existing cards) and partly because it had separate instruction and data caches that broke a lot of existing self-modifying code. An Acorn application note with differences is online[0].

Honestly, those of us with StrongARMs were prone to showing off about it because it was such a speed upgrade over the existing machine. I didn't acquire mine until 1999, well after the whole Acorn ecosystem was obsolescent, but I might well have put it in my sig anyway...

[0]: http://chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/docs/Acorn/AN/295...
You are right! They have not passed us yet, but our life expectancy is going down, while theirs is going up; so this may happen down the road
If you look at the studies about cosleeping and death, it’s almost always a non-parent.
Hopefully we'll get modular implicits some day, which should help with the typeclass envy ;)
KMP (Knuth-Morris-Pratt) – Algos in Plain English
Bah come solve it then, datalisp.is.
Typical nuclear fanboy.

Nobody is running on renewables. Well, there are some exceptions. Countries like Norway and Sweden have enough hydro that they do run on renewables. But ignoring those, nobody does.

Wind and solar pairs well with natural gas. Coming from a fossil fuel situation, wind and solar paired with gas have the big advantage that you get a reliable system, easy reduction of CO2 by adding more wind and solar. And it is cheap.

New nuclear is not cheap (compared to Russian gas).

Of course where this failed was in the gas part. Obviously, wind and solar need to be blamed for the lack of Russian gas. Same with Texas, when something goes wrong, blame renewables.

The obvious problem, for both renewables and for nuclear is cheap fossil fuel.

Expensive fossil fuel might make nuclear attractive.

Expensive fossil fuel will result in a focus on storage. But before that, most EU countries need a lot more wind and solar before they can focus on storage. There is no point in focusing on storage if output of renewables can't keep up with demand.