skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The article shows startup time from enter to output being very, very fast.

Having rust, go, c, c++, being able to be transpiled to wasm byte code is already more flexible than jvm. Why isn’t there a popular C front end to jvm? -> there’s the flex. Also wasm runs in browser w/o loading applets.

Worry about bloat when the project is more mature; there’s no bloat right now and worth exploring.
Ok. Haven’t traveled outside of the US in a while, but I agree some of this sounds paranoid.

That said, I believe whole heartedly in this:

“Walk out of the front door with the confidence that you know where you are going.”

If you’re overseas and don’t speak the language, the experience can be disorienting. I had my travel wallet picked out of my pocket in a tourist office.

Places like banks, ATMs and hotels are places where pickpockets and robbers congregate. Take 5-10 minutes and watch these areas in large foreign cities and you may notice suspicious patterns.

I live outside NYC and do the same when I’m in an unfamiliar neighborhood. I avoid being out in these places after 9 pm as well. Just look at the police blotter, and you see most robberies occur late night and early morning.

I don’t take precautions because I’m fearful of going out. I do it because I know better.
Long press?
This is really cool!

Measuring something as that nobody even thinks about or realizes is there, and finding an actual big difference in performance is always a delightful discovery to me.
How do you define property rights for air and water? If I own a section of a stream and I dump my garbage into it, am I polluting my property or another's property? What if the consequences were unforeseen (as is often the case with groundwater contamination)?

Edit: moreover how is "the free market" going to defend the property rights of others in these cases? I assume via civil litigation. But what if my victims can't afford prolonged litigation or I decide that the potential cost of a settlement is less than the cost of disposing of pollutants properly?
Unfortunately every major provider has this happen. Google and Microsoft especially since they have their productivity platforms that send mail through the same infrastructure as their free email services. They also have to deal with more problems through compromised education accounts - students aren't that great at protecting their school credentials, and some businesses aren't much better.
I think what makes it horizontal for me is that you can't "go home and stop being a Thunderbird member". A "Thunderbird member" is something you are, rather than something you do. So this effectively asserts project ownership over the person.

This is why I don't care what they do on project media like ML. That's a social space that's reserved for the project itself, so fair's fair. It's part of their slice, but "Twitter, Facebook and Telegram" is not. It's like a school deciding that a child is a bad influence and isn't allowed to have a sleepover with another child in the same class. You have authority over them as long as they're in your care, and not one second longer.
If you scroll up in the queue you get your history and a Clear button. Not sure if it affects recommendations
props on them. I can't think of a worthier project. Would love to make redox my daily driver someday
Bandcamp has Bandcamp radio. It's very good.
You should really start to learn about more than the last 100 years of history. Localized and fights between smaller adversaries have always been more destabilizing than bigger standoffs.
> nested functions

With executable stack and all that jazz?
It's absolutely great - sounds like they'll even categorize the emails for you with an unsubscribe button.
Apparently not, lives have been shattered because old mens ambitions since ever.

Europeans and British can no longer live and work in their respective countries because of old mens ambitions.

Because of old mens ambitions large number of Americans no longer believe in democratic elections.

Because of old mens ambitions countless people have died in the middle east and other places.

What Russia is ahead of is that they are first in the game of attacking neighboring countries with regular armies for old mens ambitions.
If expressed in OCaml, it's just

let compose f5 f4 f3 f2 f1 f0 x0 x1 x2 = f5 (f4 (f3 (f2 (f1 (f0 x0 x1 x2)))))

whose signature is,

val compose :
('a -> 'b) ->
('c -> 'a) ->
('d -> 'c) ->
('e -> 'd) -> ('f -> 'e) -> ('g -> 'h -> 'i -> 'f) -> 'g -> 'h -> 'i -> 'b =
<fun>
The sun has lower power density than a compost pile. But the energy density of the sun is pretty high. In the Sun's core, the thermal energy of a cubic meter is about the same as the yield of a 5 megaton bomb. The energy that could be liberated by complete fusion of the hydrogen in that cubic meter is even larger.
I am happy to introduce OpenZiti Python SDK.

It allows you to:

* embed zero trust secure networking right into your Python application

* run your Python services without any open network ports.

Powered by: https://github.com/openziti/ziti
Thank you for sharing the post! I’m nic, ceo of questdb, your feedback about our implementation is greatly appreciated
Does this risk loosening up some of those chips' neighbors?
caution: Haven't studied particle accelerator design

My understanding of most particle accelerators is that they accelerate their subjects directly with fields, either oscillating or steady. Wakefield accelerators use a combination of fields (the laser pulse) and other particles (the "stationary" ions). My suspicion is that the ion background introduces enough noise/chaos into the process that it would be a great effort to make the output more monoenergetic and retain total brightness. But I dunno, I always found particle physics a little tedious and didn't pay as much attention as I could have.
The pacsafe itself has a wire that you loop through something immovable before fitting the padlock, thief either has to cut the wire, cut through the bag part (which is wire reinforced) or break the padlock.

Most wheeled luggage has a set of hollow metal bars inside where the retractable towing handle on the top retracts into. They're pretty sturdy, so you loop the pacsafe wire around one or both before locking it and then lock the bag.

Only way to get it out is probably to destroy the luggage or break into the pacsafe itself.

The idea behind it is that the pacsafe itself might be worth preparing for if it's just out in the open tied to something secure. If a thief has no clue it's there and thinks they just have to break the padlock on the luggage itself then it's another layer of defence they're not expecting.

But importantly, it's not really a lot of work from my pov. Again it won't deter a premeditated determined thief with the right tools, but very little will.
You’re clearly an extremely talented dev, but this is an immature attitude to have. It has nothing to do with being “anti-competitive”. It’s about how a particular system is designed. Linux decided for many reasons, including organizational and political reasons, to have the stable surface be the kernel ABI. Other systems have different considerations and design philosophies and chose differently. These are all valid choices (and even if you disagree, you’re not going to convince them to change). It’s the job of a developer targeting a platform to deal with that reality.
“I Was Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse” by Bobby Fischer (1982)
Didn’t think it would make such a big difference. I am also surprised the mesh was so quiet, I would have assumed it would have been the loudest.
> An ad popped up promoting some show, featuring foul language and sexual intercourse.

Youtube Premium has no ads.
If I remember what I did correctly, you can block most of the named sections using something like uBlock.
> Our policy is to stick with stable supported interfaces whenever possible

Except you're not doing that consistently though.

On OpenBSD, mincore(2) was removed 3 years ago, and it's UNIMPL syscall 78 was eventually recycled by a different system call: mquery(2), which your library calls expecting mincore and passes bogus arguments to.

I would be very surprised if there aren't more serious mistakes lurking in your library, in fact I know there are.

https://github.com/openbsd/src/commit/54e4f6b9a1dc183e1dc7c4...

https://github.com/openbsd/src/commit/1d60349d0b961891264d42...
Seems a slightly better business model than the one from the OP.

But it still comes somewhat close to a China-social-credit system for the internet.
How exactly is it spyware? When you say that, i'm expecting to hear about keystroke loggers, or hoovering up session cookies or something.
So, these decisions ought to be entrusted to an entity whose responsibilities are to its shareholders rather than elected representatives of the general population?
? Government does have this power, because they have courts, police, and the army.
I’m an academic quantum computing guy, and the consensus in my quasilocal community is that D-wave is, appropriately for TFA, borderline fraudulent.
At least PayPal is making a show of deciding. YouTube will demonetise your vid and pretend keeping running ads for free is not a problem.
Was just discussing this with a collage today. I’m getting random emails that are basically PDFs claiming to be crypto invoices from PayPal form random gmail addressees sent to me and CC’d to paypal@noreply.billing
> the ABI boundary chosen was well above the kernel as that is an easier place to define and maintain it.

How do we actually know that placing the boundary above the kernel makes it easier to define and maintain?
True. There is a real argument to be made here that this site is actively causing harm. Payment providers, especially credit card companies, have banned sites and services for far less, for example because they decided porn was incompatible with their public image.

But this illustrates the dilemma quite well: ideally we would like payment providers to be a public utility that is not allowed to make whimsical judgement calls, on the other hand we would like them to employ good judgement about facilitating things that are clearly detrimental.

While I share your schadenfreude in this case, I don't see how this is solvable in the general case.
Yeah, all the counterfactual bad faith bullshit actors of chaos suddenly cry for rules when it hurts them. Conveniently forget any rules and decency when they stir up shit.

Not saying paypal isn't shit but there is some schadenfreude to be had for sure.
coming to the banks you use pretty soon
I'm pretty sure Windows just automatically generates syscall numbers in their build process. Since the kernel and the dynamic libraries that are the only blessed way to interact with the kernel are shipped together, that's not a problem from Microsoft's point of view.

For example, look at [1] and search for e.g. 0x01aa, to see how the meaning of that syscall number changes in a pretty systematic way over releases.

1: https://github.com/j00ru/windows-syscalls/blob/master/x86/cs...
Just wait 'til you see all the nested tables!
You specialized in web development. You're a specialist.

You also mostly specialized in software.
> "Trust Score" is generated by a model.

Does a consumer have any insight into what the model does/doesn't like about an IP, or is it a black box?

I'm wondering how they could contextualize a score for their use case, or how I as the IP owner know what to fix to raise the score.
I think everything starting with the below paragraph of Smith’s article tries to give a decent answer to your question.

As I said, I have surely provided more than enough introductory reading! Still, let’s ask: what has been published since around the time of the Handbook which is both of note and is also reasonably accessible? There was a short collection edited by Otávio Bueno and Øystein Linnebo called New Waves in the Philosophy of Mathematics (Palgrave, 2009), which has moderate interest. Some of the papers collected in Paolo Mancosu (ed.) The Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (OUP, 2008) are worth reading. And of course, the journal Philosophia Mathematica continues to publish many good articles. But what of books?

I’m not really up on the latest stuff myself, but like other fields, typically current research is published in journal articles and it takes time for developments to be synthesized into survey books. Then again, Smith seems to believe there’s been a lull in activity lately.

My sense, though, is that after a period in which the philosophy of mathematics really flourished, there has perhaps been something of a lull more recently. However let me finish by mentioning a stand-out recent achievement, a little more wide-ranging than just philosophy of mathematics (though a considerably bumpier ride than perhaps the authors intended, so only just squeezing into what started out as an introductory list!) — namely Tim Button & Sean Walsh, Philosophy and Model Theory (OUP, 2018).

The final version of Avigad’s article was published in The Edinburgh Companion to Twentieth-Century Philosophies in 2007. Based on the content I would place the version in your link to sometime in 2006.
> See apartment bombings that led to second Chechen war.

The Second Chechen war had started in August 1999 when Chechen militants invaded neighboring Dagestan (Russian territory), with random skirmishes starting as early as May 1999

The bombings you are referring to had happened in September 1999, like a month after the conflict had already escalated into a war.

It's not hard to check the facts and timelines. Parroting every random legend or a conspiracy theory without critical thinking won't do you any good.
I swear as soon as we unlock the educational power of theorem proving software it's going to be amazing. We're close. I've been following conferences like ThEdu and ITP religiously.

https://www.uc.pt/en/congressos/thedu/ThEdu22

https://itpconference.github.io/ITP22/
For anyone wondering: Homebrew sends data to Google Analytics (https://docs.brew.sh/Analytics) on installs, build breaks, and other events. It's an opt-out setting.

Google Analytics violates the European privacy laws (GDPR). Although Homebrew sends a random Homebrew-only analytics user ID, Google gets access to the user's IP and behavioral data. Although Google claims to anonymize the user's IP address, laws like the GDPR intend to protect our private data even in the face of accidental leaking, hacking, and state-actors who could force Google's hand at storing and disclosing it.
They're working on double dipping by providing both the problem and the solution. Somehow this is not a recurrent issue for every other CDN / ddos shield. They're not even mentioning any other hosting company collaborating on this open solution that requires hardware from a specific company they totally don't have a deal with...
It's not just Huawei that left Russian market. The entire Belt and Road infrastructure project is being redirected south to Kazakhstan. And Putin had to publicly admit China has "expressed concerns".

To China, Russia is just a mafia-owned gas station. Nobody's going to fight for that.
It's not only recommendations that is broken. YT has a very sluggish frontend (I have to suffer it particularly in my x260 laptop), and for us multi-lingual people they translate stuff and you can't know in the search results which video is in which language.

I don't like YT quite honestly, and it's been a while. I understand it's a business but you don't have to provide such bad experience to make money.

For searching videos I'm more and more relying external search because with YT I just get suggested crap, like with google. I'm beyond tired with this.
Why do you have to write an important article like a 6th grade schoolpaper… demonetized is also a rather manipulative wording.

They might be right in principle but how they go about conducting it… I am no fan it made me rather the opposite.
> because the definition of OSS was clearly and strictly written to keep them in,

What? No definition of OSS I know of forces you to engage with anyone at all, unless you want to.

You can slap MIT on random code you write, host it on a HTML page with no further information available or interaction allowed, and that's perfectly fine OSS.
I don’t know anything about The Daily Sceptic. what makes it such a piece?
pedant, pseudonymous
Yes, it is a question of big principles and that's what matters.

"principle: a fundamental truth or proposition that serves as the foundation for a system of belief or behaviour or for a chain of reasoning."
Facebook, YouTube and many others are user hostile. They make money by controlling the information you see. Your attention is a commodity they sell. Both of these services... give you what you want from time to time just to keep you on the service.. then they maximize trying to divert your attention to what they want (or are paid to show you).

From one angle its quite dystopian to watch people endlessly scroll or just go from video to video on youtube.... essentially an algorithm is influencing your behavior.. perhaps programming you to an extent. Super creepy to see people everywhere just sit and stare at the device while this happens. Its like there is an illusion of user control.
Am I the only one that never thought the like/dislike buttons were tied to recommendations? That it has any effect at all surprises me. They used to be star ratings and were always meant to indicate to the video creator and other users the quality of the video.
Speaking as an quantum computing academic, I would suggest that money should be redirected from quantum computing into all kinds of biotech, except quantum computing based biotech. There’s never too little money invested in biotech research (as clinical as you can manage), only too much money off siphoned by lab reagent and equipment manufacturers. Unfortunately, non-biotech VCs have even less understanding of this tech than even quantum. That is, assuming most physicists “don’t even understand quantum” — hey, that is why I am a physicist, not a VC. But might considering becoming one after I sell my billion dollar bootstrapped QC company. Yep! The first QC giant will not take —or need—outside funding, for bloody obvious reasons. Just as the first hegemonic semitech company (Intel) birthed Venture Capital (and just like CAS hegemon Wolfram birthed a new kind of science /s) the first hegemonic qtech company will birth a new funding model (/s?)
the archive https://archive.ph/Vn1fC
> on the French trains the connection platform numbers are only announced in French, so good luck if you're not a native speaker

Funny, when I went from DC to NYC with Armtrack, the platform numbers were only announced in American, so good luck if you are not a native speaker.
> Spyware is software with malicious behavior that aims to gather information about a person or organization and send it to another entity in a way that harms the user—for example, by violating their privacy or endangering their device's security

Definitions vary, of course. But generally I think GA could be seen as spyware unless you tweak it by removing information.
That has not been my experience of dating at all fwiw
It's finally clear - You don't actually think that people are advocating for you to be fired[1]. You are just taking an absurd extreme position because after a career of not having to think too much about other languages something comes along that can actually threaten the C++ crown. Now you are worried that you'll be relegated to the niches along with your language, like assembler and cobol. Don't worry - there'll be room for you there even as C++ fades away: you can stay in the niches, or you can maintain the mountains of existing C++ code, or you can evolve and move forward with the rest of us.

You are a great case study in why the rest of us shouldn't comingle our identities with the identities of our tools.

[1] I did note that you changed it from "no new projects" to "no programs" a dirty trick that I'm only going to address by pointing it out.
> How can a nuclear armed country with a 100 million population advantage possibly lose this war? Do these people assume Russia would never mobilise its population? Or would never use its nuclear weapons?

Their military is terribly corrupt, how else can you explain Russia rolling out the T62 already?, they are meant to have plenty of T72's but that clearly wasn't the truth.

> Up until now Russia has been waging this war with its arms tied behind its back and now that the West has artificially prolonged this war with its endless shipment of weapons and intelligence, Russia has been forced to escalate.

Ah yes, Russias famous hypersonic missiles, spetsnaz, VDV and T90 hand tied behind their back. Russias be throwing everything and the kitchen sink at Ukraine, but it just doesn't seem to work, they aren't holding back _this is all they have_.

> The United States was responsible for instigating this war in the first place, by giving false confidence to Ukraine and encouraging them to play hard ball with Russia with regards to NATO membership etc. Now they are drip feeding Ukraine with weapons, just enough to keep the conflict going, ostensibly to make Russia lick its wounds and retreat in humiliation?.

The only person responsible for the current ongoing Ukrainian genocide is Russia, Russia alone made the decision to invade and Russia alone made the decision to commit war crimes.

> Not sure if its a deliberate policy but the US is in effect destroying Ukraine & giving it a slow, painful death.

Military aid to Ukraine is the only thing that stands between Ukraine and the end of its people and country. Ironically it seems like it was really good that Russia only kinda invaded in 2014 cause since then Ukraine has been strengthening their military and training for this day.

I suspect is Russia kept on rolling forward in 2014 then Ukraine would be a Russian puppet state like Belarus.

> Zelensky has huge responsibility for this war as well. His refusal to take serious Putin's threat of war, despite months of warning with solid intelligence, right up until the cruise missiles started landing, should be evidence enough of his incompetence & that he is well above his head. Now he is trying to make up for his incompetence by needlessly sacrificing tens of thousand of his own citizens lives.

Zelensky believed the Russians where better people then to invade, he was Cleary wrong.

> I genuinely find it quite repulsing how he is constantly on TV, be it Oscars, sporting events, begging for arms & aid 24/7. He has been begging for tanks, fighter jets, helicopters & even submarines. He basically wants to command the US military minus the personnel. How delusional can one get? Many find him courageous but I really think he is a narcissist who really thinks his playing a role in a movie. The US has found just the right person who is willing to fight Russia to the last Ukrainian.

He is on TV asking for weapons to help his country stop a active genocide he's doing exactly what he should be doing.
This is just silly wishful thinking. It will never happen with nuclear weapons on the table.
I hadn't heard about it before either, but you can get a good overview by following the link and having a look at the sidebar where their typical content seems to be featured.
I went through 10 articles and 100 headings and can't find an example of this.

What day was the harm posted?
You're right we don't really know the real reasons why Document Foundation charged the price they did, after all they could also put the app on the Apple Store without charging as well, and some developers do put apps on the Apple Store without any costs to the end-user.

There's a bunch of other related costs associated with commerce on apps. This is why some developers don't "charge" for apps or don't setup their own storefronts. Take credit card charge-backs or fraud disputes. By going through the Apple Storefront, Document Foundation is outsourcing that headache to Apple.
Next steps for Rust in the kernel