skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Not sure about the specific differences in glucose utilization between the soleus and the gasctroc (the other main calf muscle) but in general, yes. Calf raises should have a similar effect. The key factor seems to be the soleus doesn't fatigue as quickly, allowing this to be sustained to a point where the muscle energy source shifts to a more long term type of fuel.

As for people who bounce their calves? Absolutely - this is called NEAT (Non Exercise Activity Thermogenesis) in scientific research. Its lumped in with general movement - walking, climbing stairs, etc. This can account for a few hundred calories per day. Here's an overview study that claims up to 350 calories per day: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6058072/
Except the article is wrong. "Tackle" is doing a lot of work...it doesn't actually mean anything in this case, as AlphaFold has not been shown to help in antibiotic resistance (compounds found using it haven't even been tested in the real world), and has not increased crop resilience in any independent peer reviewed studies or in the real world. It's all still hype at this point.
People here recommend like to recommend mCoding. Our alternative YouTube recommendation algorithm can suggest dozens of similar channels to mCoding which also focus on python programming:

https://channelgalaxy.com/id%3DUCaiL2GDNpLYH6Wokkk1VNcg/
What a nice thing to say on TV -- not! I actually think it's true, some companies won't make it... but a statement like this one can be off-putting to people, so they will dismiss it as a crackpot crying wolf, to their misfortune.
CICO is not false, and that is at most a +-10% variance. Food absorption is definitely is a part of Calories In. If you're worried that you're absorbing more or less calories versus other people, adjust your Calories In.

More likely, you are miscounting calories - a common mistake that people trying to lose weight make. For example, you'd be surprised how many calories are in that packet of creamy sauce that came with your fast food!

CICO is hard to stick to, because we are biologically wired to enjoy high calorie diets. As a result, lots of people have come up with justifications as to why it wasn't their fault that they failed to adhere to it.

The reality is that weight loss is simple. It's very difficult, especially if you're not willing to completely overhaul your diet and relationship with food as an American.
Your conclusion ("this is a terrible precedent") is correct, but the way you get there makes no sense.

The government makes laws about how private companies and citizens can act all the time without funding them. You think the government has to fund every auto maker in order to impose emissions standards on them? Or that every company making communications equipment/chips is funded by the government, so that they can impose regulations on what spectrum they can use?

This is a terrible precedent because there is no sane, logical way to define social networks as common carriers, and because Section 230 was specifically written to allow and encourage content moderation.
How very heliocentric of you. Some of us worry about the moon!
Baremetal LED Blinking in Raspberry Pi in Rust [YouTube]
“How to lose weight with this one weird trick.”
Perl lost popularity when people were using windows, learnt programming with java, were scared by unix idioms, implicity, regexps, contexts and concepts like anonymous blocks you can map/filter with. nowadays everyone finally think those features
are cool (maybe even C23 will have lambdas) so perl wouldn't have lost popularity. I'm still waiting for 1 other interpreted language
to have something as convenient as the CPAN ecosystem.

However I see one similarity between C++ and Perl: for decades, they evolved a lot from there ecosystems and nowadays, both C++ and Perl could be difficult to learn just because you can't figure out what module to use to get the job done. Also Perl suffers the lisp curse http://winestockwebdesign.com/Essays/Lisp_Curse.html (I don't know about C++).
NB: I work at Timescale.

TimescaleDB is a PostgreSQL extension, just to be clear.
Road trip across Japan is quickly moving to the top of my bucket list? Has anyone done it? How was it? Must see stops?
My biggest bull case is interoperability of game assets. Look at Fortnite for example, all your paid for skins, weapons, load outs, etc are locked to that game. If one day they decide to shut down the servers to Fortnite, you lose it all. You don't actually own anything in that game despite paying for it all. Being able to take those in-game assets and use them as items in other games, is a huge step forward from the very siloed approach currently. That allows for secondary markets to pop up as well.

NFT gated services, HUGE use case.

Dynamic NFTs, I use conferences and fan experiences. With dynamic metadata you can do partial art reveals by attending specific panels or shows. That's a whole new layer to audience participation.

Story telling, with consequences to characters i.e NFTs.

There is a lot that can be discussed without the nature of the quick flip, pump and dump.
Who gets the $4B? How will it be determined where it's spent?
The time between event and apology suggests they were trying to see if they could get away with it.
In 2019, it was 14-18 minutes of explicit advertising per hour depending on the network and the genre (https://www.statista.com/statistics/1025656/ad-time-primetim...), up from about 13-16 minutes per hour in 2009 (https://time.com/96303/tv-commercials-increasing/). "Bumpers", network identifiers, and other content inserted by the airing network that is not ad space sold to a third party are not included in all of the counts. Local (as opposed to national) advertising time is also missing from some of these datasets. Overall, the duration of scripted US television shows is now approximately 40 minutes per hour: http://www.waynesthisandthat.com/commerciallength.htm

Other ways television advertising has increased over time:

Number of ad breaks. In the 1950s and early 1960s ads were aired before and after shows, often with the host of the show doing the ad reads for one or two products that were billed as the show's "sponsors". A break for ads in the middle of the content was added in the mid-1960s, and the number of breaks per hour increased at least into the 1990s. https://ibuzzle.com/television-advertising-history

Number of ads per break. Television ads have gotten generally shorter over time. 30 seconds became the norm during the 1970s. From 2009 to 2019, the percentage of ads that were 15 seconds long increased from 35% to 42% (https://time.com/96303/tv-commercials-increasing/).

Amount of paid product placement inside the shows. In 2009, product placement occupied between 5.5 minutes and 19.25 minutes per hour, with unscripted shows the highest (https://www.marketingcharts.com/television-9434). Spending on television product placement has increased since then (https://www.marketingcharts.com/cross-media-and-traditional/...).

Addition of advertising to previously ad-free platforms. I recall that most cable networks originally did not air ads but cannot find the data to back that up. In 2021-2022, streaming services have increasingly added ads: https://www.marketingcharts.com/television/tv-advertising-22... In a 2022 survey, 41% of American TV-watching adults felt there were too many ads on television vs. 18-25% for various streaming platforms (https://hubresearchllc.com/reports/?category=2022&title=2022...).
What we need are digital identify verification strategies for content, such as associating cryptographic signatures with videos.
Sadly this decision will lead to more fragmentation, not less, won't it? Would have be nice if there was a path forward for Android standards.
if wikipedia says it, it might be true then. thank you mickey .
My nearly 3yo can hardly handle it in a longer drive. There’s always a scene were emotions are too much. Peppa Pig it is for now…
> States move faster... so fast that a technology company would be constantly chasing 50 different state laws.

As a person who's data is being sold I would one up it and wish that each county would produce their own regulations. That business is a cancer.
> So basically, this is a mostly toothless law, that requires small companies to follow to the extreme detriment of the large companies

The bill outlines exemptions for business making less than 40 million annually. I haven't read the whole thing so it's possible I missed something, could you point out which sections you're referring to to draw that conclusion?
Might have something to do with the "need for speed". Running further than your glycogen alone can take you - increases your survival odds.
I suppose one man's regulatory capture is balanced by another man's monopolistic behemoth pushing out a competitor that doesn't have an alternate revenue stream.
Nothing beats free. Stallman wrote a great essay on this called "Who does that server really serve?", decrying the redundancy and ultimate futility of building software-as-a-service. You will always be at-risk of being undercut by a free alternative. Selling software is an anti-pattern of computing, you have every right to be afraid of cheaper/better products wrecking your shop.

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-s...
Ukraine war: Russians flee to border after military call-up
I wonder how this will work with slack orgs with short data retention policies. It wouldn't make sense to delete parts of a Canvas, as "Canvas docs are collaborative, and all their comments are just Slack threads." (from https://www.theverge.com/2022/9/20/23361717/slack-canvas-doc...)
> Lots of other factors affect metabolism, hunger and energy levels, all of which have huge effect on weight loss\gain.

Metabolism/energy levels/etc are Calories Out. If your metabolism is low, your Calories Out is lower.

Look at BMR, such as https://www.active.com/fitness/calculators/bmr

Very simple. CICO.

e: there are relatively rare medical conditions, such as water retention, that can affect weight loss. A better term might be "body fat percentage". But the end result is that if you want to lose body fat, consistently intake less calories than your body uses for energy.
I'm an immigrant in Sweden but according to you I'm just coming here making evil comments because I have nothing better to do. While the reality of the situation is that I've given this much thought and have personal relationships to many SD voters in the country side. Not the best relationships sometimes. Also these are not the most self-aware people in the world in 99% of cases.
But they didn't solve the protein folding problem. They solved a simpler problem, protein structure prediction.

What is important about their discovery is that we now know for certain that a judicious combination of expensive-to-obtain structure information, and easy-to-obtain protein sequence relationships can be used to build a generalized protein structure predictor (it can predict structures with no prior example of a fold, although there are limits)... and you don't have solve the general folding problem to do it. You do not need to know the path, to get to the destination!

Many of us in the field expected this to be true but there wasn't any really good example to point to that was widely accepted by the community. And in the ~year or so since this was demonstrated, the community has already found a wide range of uses for this that have validated the structure predictions and demonstrated their utility- using open codes and models.
But in a muscle? That seems to be the argument here, unless it's just bad journalism.
Well, one way to lose an antitrust case is putting obviously anticompetitive clauses into contracts, like here. This is much easier to prove than the whole "customer harm through abuse of dominant market position" thing!

Much like when Jobs called up all the book publishers and told them straight up "we gotta agree on one price among us, and remember we are doing this to harm Amazon who we both hate". Now this was a slam dunk prosecution!
> Nitrogen is only one ingredient, what about the others phosporus and potassium?

I did cover that, above.

> If it was so readily available why did the war in the Ukraine affect the fertilizers market?

Primarily because the most popular chemical processes for creating ammonium is to use natural gas to bind the nitrogen. (It carries the hydrogen needed as well as the energy, and is cheap when natural gas is cheap.)

But if you don't have natural gas, you can take the hydrogen from somewhere else (like water) as long as you have the energy needed.
I love that by reading this article, I've been introduced to itch.io.
Cyrus IMAP has been using skiplists for its storage for around 20 years IIRC.

https://www.cyrusimap.org/imap/concepts/deployment/databases...

I was very excited to come across this when I was working at fastmail. We used Cyrus from the start, and I loved seeing such a cool data structure getting utilised in practice.

https://fastmail.blog/open-technologies/why-we-contribute/
Firefox OS was built from a lot of Android internals.
Lexica's search API is now for anybody to use for free
Tim Ferriss was one of the first to avoid a traditional book tour when marketing his first book (4 hr work week). Instead, he reached out to bloggers, which was a new strategy at the time. He's written that he would tailor each interaction for the culture of each blog. So he'd use a portion about fitness for a fitness blog, and a portion about finance for a finance blog, etc. At least that mixed it up a bit.
So is crypto. I'll ask again - how is this avoiding the "mistakes" PGP made?
That assumes that that minuscule time being spent on writing 3 more characters+ is actually a productivity hit (it is not).

+ I am actually not sure whether even that is true. With how great intellij is, I would honestly wouldn’t be surprised if writing a java program would come out as less keystrokes than the equivalent program in a less verbose language.
"but why would anyone pay for a URL shortener?"

If you are sending automated sms, to around phone carrier blocking people use bit.ly etc. A new domain would take a lot of testing.
The issue is that people seem to equate "good documentation" with complete.

It's just not possible to do this. I think it would be better to talk about "effective documentation".

My opinion on the matter:

Three levels of documentation

1. high level documentation that describes the problems and the goals from the business perspective

2. mid-level documentation that describes the architecture that gets us there

3. low-level documentation, aka code.

high level gives you direction (where), mid-level gives you context (what), low-level gives you implementation (how)

You need the what to understand the how, and you need the where to understand the what.

The other piece is an acceptance that you can't document away the need for tacit knowledge.

To draw an analogy.

No amount of documentation is ever going to allow a kid to hop on a bike and ride it perfectly the first time. That is not what it means to teach a child to ride a bike.
Instead the goal is to have enough documentation to minimize the amount of time it takes that child to gain the tacit knowledge necessary to ride a bike acceptably.

Once you accept the above and lower your bar, "effective documentation" becomes much more achievable.
> but it is ridiculous to call it a proof.

Proofs are for mathematics, not for science. (I share your distaste for science journalism that throws big words like "prove" around without much care, but that's probably not something you can fault the study authors for.)

This is evidence in favour of a theory. It is to be understood within a larger body of evidence. Eventually, hopefully, there is enough evidence in one direction or another that we may draw more or less definitive conclusions.

> I made it a point to not read it, because virtually all social science papers are like these. It's really not worth my time

Nobody is forcing you to read this study, but somehow you seem to assume that your shallow dismissals (to which you are of course entitled privately) are worth anyone's time.
506Sports – Live sports regional broadcast maps
Can we get this for legal documents? Maybe with the ability to spot things that might be loopholes?
I'm curious, what would be the right amount in your opinion? How would you value it?
I think it depends on whether your phone is on silent.
CICO is absolutely true, that's a fact. All you have to do is look at the basic physics. If you reduce the mass of the Earth by 50% (without decreasing your distance from Earths center, a common trap people fall into when they're trying to lose weight), you will lose 50% of your weight.

Fad diets and "body mass" are, excuse my harsh language, B.S. Yes they can contribute to weight loss but they are going to let you lose 10 or 15 pounds tops. Reducing the weight of the Earth, on the other hand, can get you to lose essentially any amount of weight.
In the U.S. the main answer to this question is Health Insurance. The U.S. Health Insurance market is designed around the idea that your company pays (in part) for your health insurance. Most plans available to individuals are complete garbage and horrendously expensive.
There's a huge time savings that comes from being an FTE. Managing benefits, taxes, and hours takes up a non-insignificant amount of time. When I was a contractor, I had to keep track of my time pretty much down to the minute, then I'd submit an invoice and wait 60 days for a check. So I'd also need to keep track of what hours I have been paid for. Not having to keep on top of getting paid is alone worth being a FTE. Though, I'm not sure if there are places that pay FTE-like contractors on a more regular cadence or not.

I don't see where the tax savings comes in, especially now that the standard deduction is ~13k per person. I'm not going to pretend to be an expert here, but I don't see how I could accumulate that much in tax deductions each year, even deducting part of my house and buying new computer equipment all the time. This is especially true now that I get a tax-free stipend that covers my internet and mobile phone as part of my paycheck.

I might be able to squeeze a few more dollars out each year because I work for a place that has "unlimited" PTO and I don't really take PTO. But I feel like those hours would be lost dealing with getting paid.
If those guys are going to replace Java with anything it ain't going to be go or rust it'll be C#
Yeah, and I have it set for Zoom and it still turns on a Teams meeting every single time. I'm using the Outlook web UI.
Metador, an Unattributed Threat Hiding in Telcos/ISPs/Universities
Don't eat breakfast and don't gorge on snacks before bedtime. That will be a huge benefit to most people that struggle. Now...getting the willpower to stick with it is another battle...
> You didn’t actually need to remove mass from the Earth, you just needed to go under it. You could’ve avoided all that work with a comparatively simple tunnel.

Or a really tall ladder.
The fake sex chats fuelled by an elaborate scam
I'm in the same boat as you, I don't think that he's doing it intentionally but I just don't believe he possesses a smooth enough modulation to enjoy listening for long periods of time as you would with an audiobook.
I’m surprised how many people stopped reading at CICO. It’s like a meta example of clickbait in 3 sentences.
The follow-up comment is not low-effort and shallow, the original one was.

Not sure why OP considers themselves to have been "baited" when the conversation IMHO has been greatly improved by them substantiating their criticism (which may have its merit).
I would say that overhauling your diet/relationship with food is really not what it's about. It's about gathering the necessary energy, resources, etc. to start putting significant amounts of Earth's mass on an escape trajectory.
Good point. I (think I) remember seeing guidelines being used to enforce a mod action though, so then they would stop being guideliness and become rules.
The last thing I want to do is upgrade all my TVs and audio equipment for new standards
Even before Figma sold to Adobe a major problem with their product is the proprietary "file format". Basically they import .sketch files but you can't export your work and you're locked in. When they want more money they can just raise prices and you'll pay if you're a business for example, because your process is littered with links to figma files and etc...
Sketch is not perfect, but at least their file format is open source and is "imported" in other tools and you own your files.
Argentina Government Intervenes After Country Runs Out of World Cup Stickers
There are people who train their entire bodies to function on different biochemical processes, generally long distance endurance athletes training to perform in a fat adapted state for ultramarathons and the like.

The research here just seems to suggest that the soleus muscle itself has a lower "barrier to entry" before utilizing different energy sources (blood glucose and fat oxidation) which allows it to sustain activity for a longer time duration. This makes sense, as the soleus is highly involved in walking, and humans basically evolved to walk more than we've evolved to do anything else.
Logic compels us to conclude that we will see some results of this on our daily lives and it will become the solution to some "problems".

Problem is, our major problems are mostly social. Biologists will sell you the story that this is a breakthrough that will empower us to improve crop yield and solve world hunger. But we all know we could already have solved it. Turns out the US rather spend billions to build another aircraft carrier instead of develop Africa's farm machinery industry. It is sad. But it is the world.
"It's not as simple as simply doing a heel lift or raising your legs when you're sitting or shaking your leg or fidgeting. It's a very specific movement that's designed where we use some technologies that aren't necessarily available to the public unless you're a scientist and you know how to use it."

This has a bit of a 'smell' that I can't quite put my finger on.
raises many questions:

- what movements was this evolved to support? (sprinting? walking a different way than was studied? running?)

- Are our shoes causing us to underuse this muscle?

Just from the video and the cadence shown I suspect if you did a slightly quick jog running on your forefoot you might hit that muscle on the rebound.
I thought for a minute it was new Ryanair product.
That may be their expectation stylistically, but the first Debian release shipped[1] with bash as the default shell. I’m not aware of them ever having shipped the original Bourne shell. Your claim — that I was responding to - was that on early Linux systems you might only find the Bourne shell but not bash. That simply was not the case.

1 - http://archive.debian.org/debian-archive/debian/dists/buzz/m...
That's different, NCCL manages traffic between GPUs, but each GPU (with its memory) is still treated as a separate entity by Pytorch or TF. Basically if your model does not fit in a single GPU memory, Pytorch will not automatically distribute it across two GPUs even if the GPUs are connected with NVLink. You can use model/tensor parallel methods to do this, but it's not going to be automatic (will require writing extra code).
Fun Newsletter Growth Hack
See? Don't skip leg day.
apart from the download that happens once, it is just a case of pointing your camera to the code and the browser open by the touching the screen once. Quicker than typing a shortened url.
Banned Books: The 'dangerous' books too powerful to read
Unless we can find a technology that seriously reduces or eliminates the need for lithium, recycling it will be mandatory or we'll simply run out.

How long it will be before we've used up the earth's lithium supply is very much in debate. It depends on how large the demand will be, which is a thing we can only speculate about.

But current estimates range from 20 to 200 years.