> by your standards.

Which I try to form by querying as many people as possible from as many countries as possible, which my job requires on a daily basis.

> I could be one that think that your insistence on writing that your messages are "kind and neutral" it's a sign of arrogance.

Of course you can, by your standards. By my colleagues from many different nationalities and age groups does not share your sentiment.

> You are not neutral, you think everyone is like you and what you find neutral and kind, is actually neutral and kind.

No. I have no assumptions, no expectations. I just converse like me, and they converse like them. When I no longer want to deal with the other person/party. I just tell the reason and leave. Who am I to expect something from someone? God?

> What you wrote is the equivalent of saying to a depressed person "just don't be sad".

No. That was not my intention, if it sounded like that, I'm sorry about it.

> And some people don't.

And, that's OK.

> That doesn't mean they are evil or what they say it's wrong.

Did I ever told anything like that? I don't think so. I also don't think that way. So, this is a wrong assumption to start with.

> And anyway, anyone will die eventually, so it's not really a threat if someone's has a death wish and the medicine was prescribed to alleviate that death wish.

Just don't move the goalposts there, OK?

> Welcome to planet Earth, among humans, that are in majority different from you and come in majority from a culture different from yours.

I cherish this difference for a very long time, both in work and personal life.

> You sound very young to me, from what you write and what you think.

You're making a mistake here, but I'll leave the details out.

> You lack empathy, which is problematic to me.

Oh. Normally I'm not like that, but today's very stressful. I might have lost some of it today. Honestly, sorry.

BTW, your tone is not very emphatic and kind either. You mentioned that you're a soulless robot. You sound like you're very far from it.

> You actually believe that guilt trips are a good solution, when in fact they are much worse for mental health, especially for young people

Actually no. I pay special attention to not guilt-trip people. This is very cruel. If I did it, again, honestly sorry about it. I need to look into it. I've mirrored some of your tone and reused your words intentionally in my conversation to mirror yourself to you, and if that hurt, you need to look into it. I'd rather hurt myself rather than other people tho.

> You don't realize, probably, that manipulating people in doing something it's wrong.

Again, I never, ever manipulate people. You're starting to put a lot of assumptions on top of me. This is disconcerting. I'm not telling you're doing the same, but you need to do some soul searching, seriously.

> It is called argument from false premise.

Actually, it's a question, where its answer might be completely different from what I guess, and this is OK. I'm not trying to be right, I'm trying to query.

Honestly, I live read and answered your comment Q&A style, and arrived somewhere I never guessed. Some of the assumptions you put on me are borderline disturbing. I have taken some notes for myself, but you really need to reflect, too.

I'm closing this conversation here, for now, because I'm out of free time and need to handle these stressful things I've mentioned. If you want to continue further, you can reach me via my info page.

Take care.