skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The answer is, "A lot more than you think."

One of the attacks that fraudsters have developed is to buy businesses to use their accounts for fraud. That going out with a fraudulent bang is better than trying to run a marginal business.
Unless the prion is a quine, and then you have successfully ended the world.
Current Anti Money Laundering regulations actually require the exact opposite! If a financial company's customer is under review for fraud or money laundering, it is illegal for that company to let their user know.
Yes you're right there are differences. What I'm seeing is Markdoc custom tags and Liquid custom tags can both do any programmatic effects, ASTs, etc.

Perhaps an example may be useful? Or do you have an example where Markdoc custom tags are especially different/better than Liquid custom tags?

Markdoc custom tag syntax:

{% bold %}
Lorem ipsum
{% /bold %}

Liquid custom tag syntax:

{% bold %}
Lorem ipsum
{% endbold %}

Markdoc custom tag code is like this in JavaScript:

export const bold = {
render: 'Bold'
…
};

import \* as React from 'react';

function Foo({ children }) {
return (
<b>{children}</b>
);
}

return Markdoc.renderers.react(
content, React, {
components: {
Bold: Bold
}
}
);

Liquid custom tag code is like this in Ruby:

class Bold < Liquid::Block

def initialize(_tag_name, _content, parse_context)
super
# Do whatever you want here,
# such as parsing to your favorite AST,
# or calling a DB, or RPC, or API, etc.
end

def render(context)
# Do whatever you want here,
# such as processing your favorite AST,
# or using the rend context vars, etc.
"<b>" + super.strip + "</b>"
end

end

Liquid::Template.register_tag("bold", Bold)
print Liquid::Template.parse(File.read("my.txt")).render
Oh bravo. Bingo. If only this was more understood.
Check Compact GUI if you are Windows users.
Most new TVs are smart TVs so even if you do this you are still running on like Samsung have been caught screen capturing your TV and phoning home for advertising.
>The catch is that people will notice 51% attacks.

The thing about crypto is that the majority hashrate/stake gets to decide what is an "attack" and what isn't. This behavior isn't a bug, it's a feature and it's what separates crypto from fiat.

With PoW, sooner or later the attacker will run out of money. When they stop paying for the hashrate, their votes all goes away, they don't get extra points for being the top miner at one point in time. With PoS, getting a majority means that your majority will actually increase over time unless someone actively decides to burn the cash necessary to stop you. The longer the community waits/debate over it, the harder it will be to remove the "attacker".
Given [1], this is no surprise

[1] https://www.apa.org/monitor/julaug04/standing
Fog is a common reason for delayed flights into SFO, as reduced visibility prevents planes from being able to land side by side, halving the rate at which planes are able to land [1]. I don't know if this leads to many flights being canceled outright, but I have certainly experienced massive delays flying into SFO due to fog - typicially on shorter regional flights where ATC will prevent your plane from even taking off at the point of departure due to congestion at SFO.

[1] https://www.kqed.org/news/11772407/why-is-sfo-so-delayed
It's not the tall windows themselves that are dangerous, it's the accompanying low door sills. Higher door sills mean more of your body is protected by metal instead of glass.
It's your lucky day https://web3isgoinggreat.com/
Yes. GNU C codebases are not written defensively or with strong test suites (if any) and tend to have piles of serious bugs that take years to spot. I use such tools heavily on a personal basis but I avoid running such things in production I high risk environments at almost all costs.

I also thought the same and argued the same about UX until I had to train several large teams to use it, and found myself making piles of shell script wrappers to pacify the majority of modern devs who are intimidated by any CLI commands that do not start with npm or git.

PGP is the right spec, IMO. It is just time to shift to more mature implementations that are easier to trust the defaults of and program against.

The majority of Sequoia devs are former GnuPG devs btw. They realized the shortest path to a broadly library-first testable codebase, a memory safety, secure default ciphers, etc was starting over.
You can use APISIX API Gateway as a traffic entrance to process all business data, including dynamic routing, dynamic upstream, dynamic certificates, A/B testing, canary release, blue-green deployment, limit rate, defense against malicious attacks, metrics, monitoring alarms, service observability, service governance, etc.
Davinci Resolve has a much better UI than Premiere, and the thought out workflow that’s built in is great.
The fact that it actually comes with a Raspberry Pi is incredibly cool to me.

Oh, and of course there's a review of it from Jeff Geerling: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-epPf7D8oMk

Actually, this thing has some pretty decent specs... my initial reaction was that it was overpriced, but now I'm thinking this is a decent deal for what you get.
Sometimes the last bad thing means that good things are coming. Other times, it means that nothing more is coming.
Why not? Almost everyone that had it before won it through conquest, but only Britain is being held to a standard where that is forbidden.
The obligation seems entirely arbitrary.

First, the employee (not the company) is the willing participant with the state benefits and obligations.

If the employee was hired in AZ, and never changed his tax residency to say CA with employer, why would employee be able to claim protections given by CA? If employees are going to play the game, they should be OK with the consequences.

Second, company level agreements don't work this way. Why should tax nexus ?
For examples a company is based in CA, so it states its legal venue is in CA for contract disputes. Company then moves to FL....The tax residency change does not give the company the right to to update its legal venue to FL for convenience with its contractual counterparties.

So then, why can states break basic contract rules, which we hold sacrosant at the company-person level ? And what regulation exists to entitle states to pursue companies that do this unwillingly ?

There are laws that state you must pay taxes, not discriminate, etc.

What are the laws that mandate companies to know where your remote employee is working at all times ?

Should a company need to know the rules of 50 different states at all times, to know if they must check employees working offsite ? And how is a company subject to a jurisdiction's rules that it does not know it is party to ?
> seeds of AI that will terraform society and rapidly displace human labor over the coming decades

Replace AI with any other labor saving technology and your statement becomes just a truism without substance.

AI is already displacing human labor, just try to talk to a non-robot when you call a customer service line these days. It’s a selling point to have real humans answering phones anymore.

Being fungible with human labor is what people are really talking about not some answering machine with “AI” brains that replaced the old-school answering services.
Deep-State Anti-Iran Government website:

"Radio Free Europe was created and grew in its early years through the efforts of the National Committee for a Free Europe (NCFE), an anti-communist CIA front organization that was formed by Allen Dulles in New York City in 1949."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_Free_Europe/Radio_Libert...

Take anything RFE/RL says with a HUGE pinch of salt.
YouTube won't do this. They're only trying it.
Agreed. We did get a few days of the real thing this past winter, which was a nice surprise, but it used to happen a lot.

Ah, the days of driving home from a date in that fog. Had to drive with your head out the window because of the fog outside and inside. :-)
Rust doesn't have stable ABI, so distributions don't provide "standard library", they provide the toolchain you use to build your rust packages. Emphasis on packages because that's the use-case for toolchain provided by distro and not local development.

In the end, you end up with a binary that is statically linked, except for `glibc` (unless you use libc like musl) and whatever C library you choose to dynamically link against.

Since this is an in-house project, they can build their packages with whatever toolchain they choose and distribute packages for deployment. So whatever toolchain provided by distro is irrelevant unless this packages is part of the distro's official package repository (which it isn't in this case).
Verizon has a good CDN but I don't know about managing multiple clients
Well if that is the point then Youtube can just make a public, legally binding, unrevokable declaration that they will never insert ads into Youtube Premium. Since they are not going to do it, they lose nothing and their customers get a legally binding assurance. Problem solved.
doesn't gpg do a pretty decent job of that? i guess it's not transferable but... why do you need that?
How Far Can a Cat Fall and Survive? The Limit May Not Exist
> I am quite confident that OP’s problems with Stripe are AML related

I'm curious as to why you think that? Is this a way way more common thing than I expect? Or is "My startup uses Stripe Connect to accept payments on behalf of our clients" a raging red AML flag I don't recognise (I've never done that, so it could easily be)?
Another main tool that I know she uses is called Practical Law. It's another website, but I don't know if it's from Westlaw or Thomson Reuters. I know that she led the effort to get her entire firm on the system, and she was able to get them a substantial discount as well. But that contract does have to be renewed every year.
So what? The world would be a sad place if bare minimum utilitarianism was required for all aspects of our life.

Nice things should be allowed to exist for the people who are responsible enough to enjoy them. If people break the law, then they should be punished. If they don’t, they shouldn’t.
> full of historical inequity.

Granted the academic profession has historical inequality but what about the math itself displays that?
I got a slightly shorter path through William Astbury

Chromosome,DNA,William Astbury,London,United Kingdom,BBC,BBC One
It may be related to a general policy of burning grey market businesses that has been going on for a decade or so: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Choke_Point

While I don't know what the incentives are for payment processors, they act as though they are under a quota, similar to SARs in banks, where it's mainly about showing they are getting petty crime as a means to protect their interest in partnership level crime.
That's because they're far more convenient and user friendly, and the fraud detection makes up for that compromise in security. As far as user experience goes, it's a win-win and a superior experience to paying with cryptocurrency.
sucks to lose but winners do what they want
The obvious answer is that it's been tested to result in fewer cancellations.

The optimization is for short term profit, not for customer experience.

If you care about customer experience, talk to the government, not businesses
Ha! Clearnet exit scams. Kinda an obvious thing in retrospect. Of _course_ somebody was going to try it.
There is also a big difference between Russia having to shut down a gas pipe for maintenance and politically motivated energy blackmail.

...Or is there?
This was a really quite insidious action taken. No longer innocent until proven guilty or not being judged because of worst case use or misuse. Now we are getting into police state type of mentalities when it comes to money. It's bad and dangerous enough that we treat (force) banks, CC and PPs as pseudo unofficial law enforcement and hold them accountable legally, but now this!

Great read.
Why? It's closed door development in nginx from their perspective. This doesn't apply for their in-house project. They not telling you why you would want to switch off Nginx, they are telling you why they've switched.
Why is a platform responsible for the behavior of its users? If a person throws a knife and kills someone, we don't go after the knife maker. Yeah, I know: it's hard to go after an individual. Guess what? It's hard for a platform to go after an individual too.

I don't do any social media crap and think its a huge waste of time. But the government saying social media is responsible for people's shitty behavior doesn't really make sense to me.
mate I know who India and Pakistan are, there's a difference between zero sum conflict between both countries and getting colonial artifacts back from Britain. You'd be surprised how easy agreement on the latter would be.
the same benefit you get from most reverse proxies. If you dont need it, then nothing. If you do need it, it's critical.

If you:
- have more than 1 upstream service to hide behind your api.bigcorp.com name?
- want to enforce standard authn/authz patterns across lots of teams/backend services?
- want a standard approach to all the Quality of Service management?
- want to have a well defined lifecycle for your APIs?
- want to have a portal that describes the APIs, how they work and facilitate users getting access to them?

API Gateways are a thing because web servers that started out being used as reverse proxies were not that easy to configure and just did way too much web server stuff. API gateways made this easier, and added a host of security measures to make it somewhat safer when presenting APIs to the internet.

Then API management came along as a first class concern for orgs who want others to use their APIs.

It's good to see some FOSS innovation in this domain, most of the real open source API gateways are a huge mess. Kong is great, but the really useful stuff is part of the paid enterprise platform.
Its really about the industrial interest in it. Swift made it hard to adopt and gain skills because pretty much every day something big would change with it that did not make it easier, it made it harder to use. You couldn't manage a code base with it because with every new thing they changed it blew up everything. So you might make a driver in Swift, but only for apple because the only alternative is Objective-C, which is also just slightly more sane than C++ which should be put in an asylum.

Since I hate apple and their languages I'm never going to bother with them again. Either the language or the company.
I second this as a recent learner.

I have been learning Rust by writing some toy code over the weekends, and 9 out of 10 times when I hit a roadblock and went to my local Rust Users Group, the answer was "just wait for GAT". Turns out these patterns occur organically out of fairly mundane needs of abstraction (e.g. the now-infamous `LendingIterator`), and especially for me as a C++17/20 daily driver, _arbitrary_ limitations on expressivity.

Don't get me wrong --- Rust feels a lot more expressive than C++17/20 in the vast majority of areas, but for the rest maybe 10%, it's pothole land for stable Rust. Eliminating some of these potholes is a big win for Rust's adoption story.
I must be a crypto maximalist right?!

No! I want to talk about this with people who are actually making things for it, in a detailed way. Including...hold your breath...inviting people to criticize it!
In my opinion, the two most important points;

1. Apache APISIX is a project of the Apache Software Foundation, while Kong is a project controlled by a commercial company (it is possible to change the license).

2. The Apache APISIX community is more active and vibrant
Lightbulb magnetism shown to penetrate solid walls -- may disrupt bloodflow if used outside a bedroom.
They're easing us into discovery of extraterrestrial life, aren't they?
This is a taste of what mathematics looks like in practice. We make much of it up as we go.

Sorry, but I strongly disagree. This is not true at all. Math, when done well, is based on a logical foundation that makes it understood by its intended audience. NO, they are not just making it up or blowing smoke. The apparent hand-waiving is still based on something which has a logical foundation or to save space.
>It would be bet cool if you could use the controller and buttons "natively".

This is what LibCEC is for.
i think you missed the part about having to run that service yourself and all the headaches that entails
Oouf. This game is fun for trivia

"Voiceless bilabial plosive" to "Rotten Tomatoes"

Time: 98.637 Seconds
Voiceless bilabial plosive,English language,African-American Vernacular English,Tupac Shakur,Nothing but Trouble (1991 film),Rotten Tomatoes
Sure; as an example, the attack on the USS Cole. Clear military target, widely described as a terrorist attack, including by the FBI (https://www.fbi.gov/history/famous-cases/uss-cole-bombing).
Ask HN: Unix process providing userfs to child processes
Posix (Unix/Linux) OS uses pipes as abstraction to let processes communicate with children.

Instead, if a process can create a user-level filesystem abstraction (of whatever data it inherited or can create) and pass it on to child, essentially limiting a FS view of child process, would it lead to a better security and communication model?
I hate it so much that you've outlined a very viable use of a blockchain.
You talk like cryptocurrencies are a valid alternative, even though they have a terrible UX that makes their adoption in the real world near non-existent. Hell, losing or getting your private keys stolen could also nuke your business. Yes, every option comes with its issues, and so far cryptocurrency's issues far exceed other options for businesses.
How on earth did they get into veterinarian offices business? Branding reasons?
This couldn’t be more wrong or dishonest. The merge has been part of the plan since 2016. The users were onboard with this from the beginning.
Revolut did this to me when I needed the balance to pay my rent. Locked account, no reason given.

7 days(!) of interactions with their support (chat via the app, the only option), sending numerous photos of cards and other things at their request, yet my account remained locked.

Eventually what worked was posting to their Facebook social media, then it was resolved within 20 minutes.

I still use Revolut because it has convenient features, but I won't keep a significant balance in the account any more, in case it is randomly locked again.

Occasionally their marketing suggests I make it my main account and salary destination. Maybe open a business account. Ha!
>It's basically like that except there is no underlying game to play,

Do you think anyone paying >1k for a Pokémon or Magic card is actually using them to play?! That shit is in a sealed case and only sees daylight to impress people or to resell it. I've met collectors who use home printed cards because they are too scared to damage even 10$ cards.
Ideally, I'd rotate it between the countries that have a historical tie. I think that is India, Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, and the U.K.. That would allow all the communities with a connection to share in the benefit.
This is a fairly common procedure for children with different length legs to fix a limping gait. My sister had it done back in 5th grade. She has additional health issues, but once the lengthening process was over, I don't recall her complaining about pain from it.
Up until about the 80s, lowercase capability was a very expensive optional-extra in I/O computer equipment.

So any language/program/data-entry used in the 30 years before about that era will be (almost) exclusively UPPER-CASE.
Desperate to get those tinder matches.
I plan to spend $300K so I can get an even foot taller
Your grandparent comment said:

> If a display manufacturer produced a quality display and supported something like this, I wouldn't mind paying a good deal extra for it.
> But if you're consuming something through a medium where you don't have full control -- such as the YouTube mobile app -- then you get what you get.

Hint: it's possible to watch YouTube in the browser on mobile. It's possible to do it with the screen off as well, using some browsers. Do with this information what you will.
Your mind will be blown when you learn what exercising stock options is.
My mind goes to various, unfortunate notational conventions.
The stuff we're learning about mycelium networks and plants these days is incredible.

It's really great getting to meet your farmer and butcher. Buying a whole animal and learning how to use the cuts and what goes into raising the animal is fascinating.
What magic wand do banks possess that enables them to declare-into-existence a merchant account, anyway? I mean in a technical sense, not a legal sense. What are payment gateways and other banks seeing, that allows them to know that a particular merchant account X is a "real" account, that can be targeted with credit card payments, rather than a made-up one?

Is there an X.509-based hierarchical bank registrar system for charge-origination signing certificates, for putting charges onto the card networks? Is there a DNS registry of merchant accounts for pre-checking charges before attempting them? Do banks underwrite other banks into existence by signing their certs?
I think it's possible they might see some benefit. It would basically hinge on people's faith in WotC vs a blockchain to administer that data. If the blockchain was more trusted - say because of concerns WotC might go out of business one day, etc - then using it might entice people to put more money in.
It has been so long since I've seen a YouTube ad I forget it has them. I pay my $7.99 a month and never see an ad.
Cute, but not a quine. A quine copies itself, not its input. That's a huge difference.
I really regret updating.
Now my photos are locked in Adobe’s cloud and I have to pay monthly to not lose them.

I mostly did photography while travelling and Covid killed that the last two years, but I still had to pay Adobe.
>not to mention the harsh centered shadow, is an immediate turn-off. Unfortunately it’s 2022 and linux design standards are still nowhere to be found.

I honestly can't fathom how people can complain about a free software that protects your privacy and gives you full control of your purchased hardware. If some overflowing text, harsh shadow, or whatever is a show-stopper, preserving your privacy wasn't that high of a priority for you anyway.

It's a free and opensource project. Feel free to open a PR or bug report.
Yep, though courts will eventually be emulated by a consensus network as well - judged by random oracles (paid jury duty essentially), and any contract can be automatically verified to comply with many others. In the end it won't be anything more special than "we digitized Law", but hey - that's gonna open a lot of doors economically for what is otherwise a very pricey process mostly reserved for richer members of society. When you can automatically iterate through thousands of contracts to check they all comply with each other "legally" - that's value. We can also do digital voting with guarantees of one-person-one-vote now, so it's not much of a leap to see where that might go.
What Columbus discovered was that there was land to the West of Europe, along the route he took, which was not known at the time.
You can always just use JQ.

Additionally, as JSON is text, you can use awk/sed/grep and so on.
Ban the user? But how would that person ever find a match with a dating site banning them? It's completely socially ostracizing for that user to not be able to use the app. How would they ever be able to function in society without access to the Catholic dating app?
If society collapses, crypto can thrive. An appropriate tradeoff, says the misanthropic, overpaid software "engineer".
I'm a grocer now. Tell me more!
Why do anti-crypto people always seem to go into all every conversation with completely bad faith?

It's fun to take something someone else built, and do something new and not planned by the origional devs with it. That's it, it's just not necessary to assume bad faith.