skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Well, I see how referring to reproduction in a herd of deer, as a collective, in everyday speech, by using the word "multiplying", but not on an individual level, which adds to my point.

As you can see, getting terminology right is challenging and not always straightforward.
"This opinion is badly reasoned so it's not even worth debating" strikes me as a very poor way of engaging in dialectic. I mean, maybe it is poorly written and poorly reasoned, but best to demonstrate that to us, otherwise we're just kind of taking your word for it...
Broadly speaking the reason it's the whole "making sure you are using the correct version of python that uses the correct NVIDIA drivers via the correct Pytorch installation" that causes the issues.

This is actually a solved problem. But it's been solved lots of different times in different incompatible ways which tend to clash on any individual computer.
You’d need most large employers to stop group-buying insurance for an individual buying on the market to have a fair shot at pricing.
>You need to buy into the phab workflow which is diff based not branch based.

What do you mean by this?
Comments like this make me lose faith in the actual teachings of philosophy and logic to non-academics. OP's post is not a straw man, and you have done nothing to prove it.

Your comment reads like someone who read a few books on logic and argument and started using them whenever they have an argument without understanding it.
To give some of Lippo's scale, they build their own towns:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lippo_Karawaci

And there are many other conglomerates of similar scale: Salim, Bakrie, Sinarmas, Astra, etc.
https://archive.ph/b25ea
They want to lower standards so they can increase diversity numbers without addressing the systemic racism in our educational system that leads to black Americans not having access to even moderately ok schools.
Use Bitwarden, it's a great password manager and it works with yubikey.

You can also self host it fully.
Each credential has its own private key which is signed by the device's private key for certification. I am uncertain if the FIDO2 spec says how those private keys need to be generated; right now they are generated randomly but they could easily be generated from a single secret/key, much like you suggest.
This resonates. It’s hard to be wound up/worn down by work and maintain an “A” game as a parent.
You're assuming UBI perfectly and completely eliminates reasons to join exploitative agreements. This is unlikely, even assuming your UBI has perfectly equitable execution, as there are many more reasons than money people get into such agreements. Most relevantly deceptive advertising, but also various forms of emotional manipulation, just not being very smart, etc. Those so vulnerable deserve at least some protection, and defending them holds the line both practically and morally for mistakes in UBI implementation, setting a clear standard for society, cutting down on people making predatory offers, and keeping you safe when you have an off day where you might make a bad decision yourself.
> Also, corporations either have personhood or they don't.

I'm fine with allowing them to censor speech if they also are liable for the speech they do choose to publish, just like any other individual, newspaper, or publisher would be.

Platforms cannot simultaneously claim that:

(1) They are mere conduits for other people's speech, and thus, deserve to be shielded from any liability for what they publish

(2) What they publish is their own speech, and thus, their publication choices should be considered protected expression under the first amendment.
Freedom of Expression is a core value in the US:

> Freedom of speech, of the press, of association, of assembly and petition -- this set of guarantees, protected by the First Amendment, comprises what we refer to as freedom of expression. The Supreme Court has written that this freedom is "the matrix, the indispensable condition of nearly every other form of freedom." Without it, other fundamental rights, like the right to vote, would wither and die.

https://www.aclu.org/other/freedom-expression

As expression increasingly moves online, we will have to find ways to protect it online. A future in which the vast majority of speech happens in private online platforms, that may curtail it at will, is not just dystopian but goes against core American values, and the essence of freedom.
Yes, because of the other fact that lowest earners' wages have stagnated for decades in the face of those gains and are currently unlivable.
> A person working as a cashier has a right to a decent living. This has nothing to do with "career".

i think people have a right to food, clean water, shelter, and healthcare. regardless of their employment status. no one should be homeless. but 'decent' is an odd word. should a cashier have a right to 'decently' raise/feed/house 6 kids? i'm not sure. should a cashier have a right to a decent living in the most expensive city in the world? that's a tough one; all cities need cashiers. probably they should be able to afford to rent a studio apt at least, that's not a 60min commute.
No you just loosened the definition of censorship to fit your terrible analogy, then you insulted the GP accusing them of doing mental gymnastics. You're projecting.

But since you do want to stick to the spam filter in your email box analogy I would like to propose a solution.

Would you prefer users be able to manage block lists, filters, and such themselves instead of content being removed for all users?

Do you really prefer this large social media oligopoly to have have final say in what the masses should see? Why not let the users manage what they see?

Do you feel the same way about all subjects? Do you support the right of ISPs blocking porn for example?
Bah, everything the GP described works perfectly in Linux. Yubikey local auth isn't just one Yubikey specific project. The Yubikey implements a fuckload of open protocols, the vast majority of which work perfectly in Linux.

Want local authentication? pam_u2f, pam_gpg, pam_x509 are all maintained.
Its a persons right to have an opinion, its your right to not listen to it. Its not your right to stop everyone else from having the opportunity to listen to it.

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Attributed to Voltaire but actually from SG Tallentyre 1906.

A more accurate quote for todays crowd may be "I disapprove of what you say, and I will fight to the death to stop others from hearing you say it."
I used Phabricator a long time ago before we eventually moved to Github due to a handful of blocking issues with the `arc` tool, and CircleCI only supporting Github (this was even pre-circle 2.0 days).

I really, really liked Phabricator and would happily have replaced Jira + Confluence + GitHub with Phorge if I was starting somewhere from scratch.
It does, but there's actually a way to do this (ie. u2f without having to buy another device) in a safe way, by using the TPM available on most computers: https://github.com/psanford/tpm-fido
If the computer is compromised you're screwed either way. Even though WebAuthN can't be easily MITM'd like TOTP codes, someone compromising your computer could just use the UI to lie to you.

I think the main reduction in security is just that the virtual 2FA device is "cloneable" vs a hardware FIDO2 token where IIRC you can't extract the internal secret. So you're getting TOTP levels of 2FA (which also uses a cloneable initialization secret) thru a FIDO2-ish UX which seems like a reasonable thing to want.
So it performs better than AIO in Linux, but how does its performance compare to non-blocking i/o?
For a nice collection of shorter stories, there's also:

Founders at Work: Stories of Startups' Early Days
Book by Jessica Livingston
At my university in the late 90s, I was required to take calculus for my CS curriculum, but no statistics courses, which I always found funny because our department was "Computer Science and Statistics". With "Data Science" (i.e. statistics) and "Machine Learning" (i.e. statistics) becoming so commonplace, I sure hope that has changed.
One of my favorite rituals to watch is certain basketball players shooting technical free throws. Normally with a free throw other players from both teams line the key, and after each free throw they’ll slap hands with their teammates after the shot. For a technical free throw there are no other players lining the key and some players will lean in and slap imaginary hands just to keep the ritual the same.
Sounds like you have an abundance of time.
Not necessarily. It's common practice for a hacker to break into a site, grab the passwords, then sell them or release them on the dark web.

The methods they used to break into the site are often considered "trade secrets".
I'd say that all foundations are mathematical (at least for 'concrete' stuff, and more besides). If lisp was foundationaly interesting presumably mathematicians would have given it more study? (perhaps they did?)

I would disagree that computation is process for doing math - it is math in its own right, specifically that for operating over a discrete state space (urgh help needed to tighten this statement up)

LC is basically a rewrite engine, so I'm not sure it would be so hard to implement? Probably some plastic bags, in two colours, paper scraps, and a marker pen would do it? (Edit - one colour bag would need 2 ordered compartments - or if you really have lots of spare time you could build it all with just plain bags and some set theory) However as you say perhaps Lisp is a better abstraction over the Turing tape (yuck).
Sitting mighty high in the saddle for someone who didn't bother addressing anything I actually said.

Edit: also unclear whether you realize I'm agreeing with the comment I responded to or not. /shrug
Anywhere in between. Do a trace route to hacker news or something - it’ll be 10-20 hops, only two of which are the local routers at the endpoints.
If you're able to intercept traffic anywhere in the path between the two parties, interception and hijacking is trivial. So yes, client LAN, server LAN, transit link, or any router on the path. And there's a bunch of routers, switches, etc, on that path, all of which have firmware that can be exploited ...

If you're not able to directly intercept the traffic, you can generally spoof the source address, but getting a copy of the return packets (other than on the client's local network) is also possible if you can inject a bogus route, for instance.

The only reason this doesn't happen a lot more than it does is that most valuable stuff uses TLS/SSL.
A similar attempt to recreate a historic to happened recently with a descent of the Grand canyon on a tule reed boat of sorts.

https://www.blm.gov/blog/2021-02-24/tule-reed-boat-runs-gran...

There's a video here
https://www.adventure-journal.com/2021/03/did-indigenous-pad...
"I disapprove of what you say, and I will fight to the death to stop others from hearing you say it." - pretty sure this is a historic quote made into todays language.
Related:

Ask HN: How to disagree with someone more powerful than you - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17834068 - Aug 2018 (7 comments)
The whole bounty hunter thing is something that was championed by the Republican party. Both locally here in Texas as well as by the party as a whole. I'm not sure how you can call that generalizing when the party directly supports that position. If someone calls themselves a Republican and votes for them knowing that this is their position, then they tacitly support it.

You're effectively taking the stance that you cannot ever criticize a political party for its actions because some small portion of its constituents may disagree which is like I mentioned before, the easy way out. It's avoiding arguing against the actual critique in favor of moving the argument somewhere entirely different.
We are supposed to treat people as individuals, not discriminate based on characteristics such as sex or race.

My eldest son is gifted and started kindergarten at 4y1mo. Now he is graduating with a 4.0 GPA in computer engineering. One data point does not prove what the ideal age to start kindergarten is, but there should be measures of readiness that are not based strictly on age.
The author admits to feeling shame for his father as a child and pride as an adult. The only true difference is that he no longer lives with his father.
Of course, but annotation is currently under development.
It sounds like texas already has legislation that regulates that, and so doesn't need to go and come back
People who insist things cannot be done get in the way of the people out there working very hard doing them.

If you cannot help, at least stay out of the way.

All of the stuff you say you will replace in 10 years will be much cheaper by then.
'This attribute is merely a hint for the browser.' Browser can do what it wants with your inputs.
>> If I’m overweight by those standards, it makes me skeptical of articles like this, and sometimes I even question the validity of the entire obesity epidemic

Based on your description, you are not overweight. The most concerning part of your comment however is that you would jump to question the entire obesity epidemic?

I mean seriously, just look around, particularly outside your own circles and where social deprestion exists in your town.
I got it.

Can you tell me please why opted for this esoteric and non mainstream term and not for a more common one like "companion" and the likes?
I used tig way back in the day, but I have found `magit` to be superior and one of the most useful emacs packages that I use daily.
> Nobody saves money in Scrooge McDuck cash vaults.

Why do I feel like you're reading half my comments and responding to that?

> The majority of people do invest in the stock market.

You're right. A slight majority, at less than 60%, based on sourced I found.

Is that where we're at now? As long as you're part of that almost 60% then it's all good?

> brokers like Robinhood have made it easy for anyone with a phone to invest.

And my point is that many people don't have enough extra income to be able to usefully benefit from this, regardless of how much easier it's become.

Someone that can only afford $100 a month to invest will see far less benefit than someone that can afford to invest $1000 a month, yet the person than can afford $1000 a month is likely not making 10x the income.

Expecting everyone to be able to benefit equally from stock market gains is ridiculous, yet suggesting people buy stock if they are worried about too much profit being directed towards companies is suggesting the problem is solved by by that, and is thus itself ridiculous.
The other person who replied to this seems to have gotten up on the wrong side of the bed, but the core of their suggestion is one I’d likewise recommend. I’m doing the yubikey local auth using the yubikey’s PIV applet, which holds standard x509 certs that can be used via pkcs11.

You should be able to set up PAM to use them in that way, without needing any yubikey-specific hijinks. Something like https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/smart-card-authentication/260...
Plenty of stuff out there: search for 'tcp session hijack' and go from there.
I think this is a wonderfully empathic view of hoarding. It’s a scale like everything, and the view of the scale is subjective. However it’s very difficult to live with one.
I would rather the value be sucked up by those who contribute towards creating it.
I remember hearing in college (a couple decades ago) that Chemical Engineering students needed to know a lot about solving differential equations.

In the math department, I was told by professors that a lot of other departments were requiring the "pre-calculus" course without requiring calculus as a means of weeding out poorer performing students.
Using multiple accounts to give the appearance of multiple voices in an argument is obviously abusive. We ban such accounts and I've banned these.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
8 seconds here, awesome!
I am finding a lot of small businesses here in the UK are trying out WhatsApp for booking jobs. For example, when I needed a couple of labourers to help me remove some garden waste recently, I received quotes by reaching out on WhatsApp.
It’s part of the more generic “decide of its own destiny” direction Apple has been taking since the new Steve Jobs area.

Apple had a huge problem maneuvering its platform when it was at the mercy of two giant companies: Microsoft and Adobe. Microsoft was in “friendly” terms and tremendously helped save the platform by bringing in IE and Office, but Adobe was a tougher rodeo (TrueType, Carbon, Flash etc.)

That’s in reaction to that history that the iPhone won’t give away the browser setting over its dead body, or competing App store where banned from the start (if it was just for the money, taking a cut of each transactions would be enough…)
There’s something very poignant about a father facing messages to his child, trying to communicate and stay in touch, trying to bridge the cultural and generational gap.
It's not 2010 anymore. How many people in the USA are both under 40 and using Facebook?
Right, "just asking a simple question" where the answer is easily found is called trolling.
An oil spill turned out to be a dead whale
"Now logically, this implies an assumption that you can assemble and petition somewhere that will reach others and the government."

I agree, however it doesn't say you have to be able to reach all or even a large percentage of the people, that they have to listen, and the like for the government.

When the first amendment was written if you were to go outside and protest in a public square how many people would hear your speech? As for the government, that's what elections are for. You can also contact your member of congress or send a letter. They ignore you? Don't vote for them.

"It would be silly to say, ok, you're allowed to do this, but only in some isolated room that's sound proof by yourself."

This is an appeal to extremes. Being censored by private companies does not lead to complete isolation of your speech because there are multiple private companies and other ways of expressing yourself.

----------------------------

"If people are now online and on some social media platform, and that's realistically the only place to reach others and the government, "

Why? Whatever method of reaching government prior to social media existing still exist now. Why is it "realistically the only place"?

---------------------------

"Public means:
done, perceived, or existing in open view > ordinary people in general; the community"

This is the definition of the word "public" in the public/private space debate we are talking about "public space" which isn't a word and doesn't have a defitinion in the diction however just a few lines from Wikipedia:

'A public space is a place that is open and accessible to the general public. Roads (including the pavement), public squares, parks, and beaches are typically considered public space.'

What a public space is or isn't is debatable. However what isn't is a private space. A business is a private space. A home is a private. Facebook's servers are private property on private space.

If I have an open house (because I'm selling) and invite the public that doesn't mean people can come in and say whatever they want. This is like a public area of Walmart, it's public per the companies rules not the state.
------------------------------

"I think just the fact many people are asking for this can be good enough to consider a reasonable way of making it happen"

The first amendment to the US condition is:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

It doesn't say people or businesses can't make rules regulating free speech. You want to change this there is a process to amend the constitution.

Perhaps a quote from Gov Abbott -

"During my time as a judge, as a justice, and as attorney general, I've had one overarching goal, and that is a strict interpretation and application of the laws and the Constitution.
"Copyright (C) 2000-2014 by Michal Zalewski"

2014
This is incorrect, advertisers and especially the American Christian lobby is responsible for most of the censorship leverage.

Back in the day, it was conservatives doing all the censorship because Johnny couldn’t hear a profanity on tv without becoming an idiot. (At home was always fine, that is of course freedom of speech).
Only theoretically. In practice, it takes a lot of know-how unseen by the public to make a product in a manner that is price-competitive against other players in the market.

Europe is obviously technologically capable of building chips and assembling functioning laptops that are ready for consumption, since as you pointed out they are capable of making the machines that make the chips; but that's still a long way from saying that they can start churning out Macbook Airs.
David Gerrold predicting smartphones in 1999
Does this "good enough category system" exist, though?

At some stage, regardless of your system, everyone seems to eventually crack the shits, after tripping over crap one too many times while looking for the stuff they actually need/want.

And this is in middle class Australia, where your average house size is something like 200sqm (floor space, not land).
It was acquired by private equity in 2018.
> Clearly it is not a question of "too much stuff" but of "too little space".

Not too sure about that. In my anecdotal experience of people I have met or known, and barring extreme pathological cases, there seems to be a specific level of clutter per individual, irrespective of available space.

This becomes apparent when said available space varies, e.g when moving to another place. Have more space, get more things, until "desired" clutter level is reached; conversely being faced with less space would result in some things being thrown away without that much concern, until "desired" clutter level is reached.
I posted a couple of follow-up articles to this one:

- I don’t know how to solve prompt injection: https://simonwillison.net/2022/Sep/16/prompt-injection-solut... - on how solutions to this are surprisingly hard to come by

- You can’t solve AI security problems with more AI: https://simonwillison.net/2022/Sep/17/prompt-injection-more-... - on why using yet more AI to detect and filter these attacks isn't likely to work well enough
> The people running the EU do not

It's not clear why one should believe you do, given that your idea of EU inner working is based on false assumptions.
have you considered that Meetup.com knows that their site is/was down?
I have mixed feelings about this kind of advice:

* In a healthy team, you ideally shouldn't need special skills to disagree with someone more powerful than you.

* But it's very common for teams to have some degree of egotism and dysfunction, so these are useful skills in practice.

* But on the other hand, this article normalizes that egotism and dysfunction; it implies that the less-powerful person is responsible for working around the more-powerful person's ego, instead of the more-powerful person being responsible for keeping their ego in check.

So even though it's useful advice for the individuals reading it, it subtly erodes the culture of the industry as a whole. And I want to push back on that. If you're in a position of power, it's your responsibility to make sure that people working with you don't need special skills to disagree with you or with other people on the team!