skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
this happened to my friend, someone took out a loan in his name, there were databreaches at over 4 companies with his data. good luck provi g which one is to blame
They only keep them for a relatively short time last time I looked so one has to manually save data after scraping it for longer term trends, vaguely remember it being forever then they cut it to six month and I think it's three now, plus if there is a lot in the category you are searching there's no way to sort it to see the oldest anymore.
Texas court upholds law banning tech companies from censoring viewpoints
Turns out that actin Joe is barely on Google:

https://www.google.com/search?q=%22actin+joe%22
There are 21" racks in use at some hyperscale clouds with OCP

https://www.opencompute.org/blog/introducing-the-open-rack
Thanks. I'll try that.
I’m working on interoperability between blockchains. The number and variety of blockchains are exploding and approaches so far have been sharply lacking - failing to tackle key problems in decentralizing, generalizing, data translation and the economics of providing a robust, secure interchain operability.

Moving from largely centralized and specific message passing and token bridging into general interoperability that is decentralized and modular for any new blockchain or multi-chain protocol to extend and build on top of is a huge challenge.
Russian official says civilian satellites may be “legitimate” military target
I’m not saying it should be proportional, often times it is impossible to do so. What you can do is check which of functionally equivalent metrics has better non-functional characteristics (eg diversity).
Musk filing claims “conspiracy among Twitter executives” to deceive public
I was told by a Hawaiian native 40 years that "da kine" meant something is awesome but it appears not to be the case.
Fire ant rafts form because of the Cheerios effect, study concludes
If I wanted to vacuum data to analyze at a grand scale, I would start a VPN company. Being able to tie user to website with accuracy to the minute for ad analytic decisioning would be extremely powerful. No TLS interception required. All dns.
Snap! You da kine.
One idea:

Try starting with an alt on twitter, which gives you some freedom to experiment and make mistakes.

You might also enjoy this article:

https://www.ribbonfarm.com/2020/01/23/being-your-selves-iden...
My Nan boxing eggs from egg boxes on an Eastern European Easter as I box NaNs.
When you say to commercialise AU university tech, what do you mean? In particular the university part, as opposed to the startups?
> You are generally free to convert a pointer to an integer and then back

(I'm going to ignore your use of the term "generally" to acknowledge that there are exceptions, because I want to elaborate on a particular exception that highlights an error in reasoning that I believe most programmers make when they manipulate memory addresses and then cast them straight to pointers.)

On CHERI, pure integer addressing can be turned off. In that case, pointers cannot necessarily be derived from integers alone. This is because CHERI implements pointer capabilities in hardware. You have to use special capability-preserving instructions to handle them, or else they permanently become invalid.

You can still manipulate memory addresses, but you generally cannot use them directly without them being part of a valid pointer. So it's valid to take a memory address, but invalid to try to use it directly.

I personally consider it unsound to try to transmute an integer into a pointer. It doesn't make sense, because [pointers are not necessarily memory addresses](https://www.ralfj.de/blog/2018/07/24/pointers-and-bytes.html). The Rust programming language is also considering taking this stance -- they already have a lint against treating pointers as integers, and with it an option to forbid it, though I'm unsure what the status on that is (it will probably remain optional forever).

This doesn't necessarily make it wrong or incorrect if the language allows for it, but I would advise not doing so, unless it's a domain-specific optimization (i.e. there is a fallback for architectures where it does not apply).
Imo that's a bit of a failed analogy. More appropriate would be, imagine coffee is something very precious and Starbucks suddenly stopped selling to women. In this case, women need to go to other cafes, increasing their competition over coffee there. But in that case it doesn't seem to be so absurd any more - perhaps it's not the case that the coffee resources are so scarce (just as it's the case with crypto - does 3x miners of some currency mean that each of them makes 3x less? I don't think so).
Also, is it true that 80% of revenue was from Ethereum, or it's dummy data?
Because we live in a society and ethnicity has massive effect on culture. At the same time, blind testing only tests what is on a test. If the test makers aren’t diverse then the test won’t test diversity. Ethnicity is an incredibly easy proxy to use.
Digital Therapist: a person who helps you with your internet addiction

Interpreter for AI: helps people understand what AI is trying to say

Data Detective: someone who makes sure data is accurate and not tampered with
I think no one has mentioned bioengineers. We're going to be programming life in the future and will need engineers to design and create new biological things.
Domains resolve to the same IP disregarding port number.
I believe the beta came out in 2010 so it's a bit older than that. It's the greatest modern roguelike of this millennium.
Wow… did JavaScript hurt your children? Have you tried typescript? It’s not so bad.
They would be breaking us law and ftc regulations if selling price and not advertised price were used that way.
Thank God, there are adults in WH now.

Enjoy guys, you deserve this!
I'm a dev. It won't make us more productive. Our limitations are not how much code can we write, it's how many requirements can we gather.
Again, unknown. If we look at history, technology that increases productivity is initially disruptive, then just frees up people to tackle bigger problems.
You're replying to a comment about the 3090. I'm not aware of any single-fan 3090s.
This is one of the most well laid out, pedagogical, and extremely informative electronics resources I've ever seen. Can they please document all the circuits I need for my work instrumentation next?
There is no difference between holding them for a year compared to selling when they vest and then buying another stock and holding that for a year.
>> Quoting Pew: "Drudge Report: Small Operation, Large Influence" [1], and Wikipedia[2]: "The Drudge Report originally attained prominence when it was the first to report what came to be known as the Lewinsky scandal. It published the story on January 17, 1998, showing that Newsweek had turned down the story."

> Indeed. I just quoted Pew making that claim: "you haven't even claimed Drudge Report is influential"

But Pew does not make that claim. "Prominence" does not mean "influential." Influential means, the capacity to have an effect on the character, development, or behavior of someone or something. Prominence means, the state of being important or famous. Your prevarication of these two words is fallacious.

> And nearly 100% of journalists from other news sources are on Twitter.

Pew reports 69%[1], so there's only about 12,000 journalists in the US that do not use Twitter.

> Oh, I see. You are under the misapprehension that "influence" means "pushing the result decisively one way or the other"

Without effect, it is not influence, as influence requires effect. Ahd if any effect is negated, there is, in fact, no effect. That is how arithmetic works.

> "Influence" can also mean changing the way it plays out, which is clearly the case as seen by the transmission and amplification of various conspiracy theories on Twitter and other social media.

Sure, Twitter is influencing elections to have the exact same results as if it had no effect. It is a very subtle, self-negating sort of influence.

[1] https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/06/27/twitter-is-...
No, not ok. That’s why you see login for price and call for price on some products.
I had the opposite experience with their warranty. I had an EVGA PSU die after less than a year, called them for warranty replacement, and they point blank refused to provide service unless I signed up for an account on their website, the sole purpose of which as far as I could tell was to harvest data for marketing purposes. I had the original proof of purchase, receipt, retail box, etc, but they didn't care. So I just don't buy EVGA products now, which isn't hard since I also don't buy Nvidia products. And it's certainly possible that this is standard (bad) practice now, but I haven't had any other PC parts fail under warranty.

That being said, I think this is a good, principled move. Nvidia is infamous for being unpleasant to work with, but their overwhelming dominance of such a large market forces people to do it anyways, so it's nice to see someone stand up to that.
Is there an equivalent feature for Android? This may be the first time I've ever felt compelled to think about getting an iPhone.
Exactly: methane breaks down naturally into two H2O and one CO2. Unfortunately nature can't keep up with the increased emissions (which are mostly impossible to prevent -- the heating earth is increasing the rate of natural methane emissions as well) so we are giving nature a hand.
Holy shit...I went goggling and the dude who wrote SRE was the same guy from google who coined the term "Don't Be Evil."

http://breakintochat.com/blog/2013/02/18/amit-patel-creator-...
> they want citizen’s united to hold so right wing candidates can be funded with unlimited corporate funds but don’t want the woke tech world to police speech

The situation is not nearly so clear-cut. Both parties seem to get about equal amounts of corporate donations, while individual contributions vary. Currently, Democrats get slightly more than Republicans from billionaire donors. From <$200 donors, Republicans got more for the 2016 elections, but now Democrats seem to be taking the lead there too. Sources:

If you sum the donations from https://www.opensecrets.org/elections-overview/biggest-donor..., Democrats get 20% more donations from ultra-rich individuals (not corporations) than Republicans, in absolute terms.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2014/07/16/th... shows that the Republican Governor's Association raised $11 million from corporate and $13 million from individuals (mostly the ultra-rich), while the Democrat counterpart raised $12.8 million from corporate and only $1 million from individuals.

On the other hand, the 2012 Trump campaign got more funds from small (<$200) contributions than Hillary's - $239 million, which amounted to 69% of his individual contributions, compared to Hillary's $137 million, which amounted to 22% of her individual contributions: https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2017/nov/13/kayleigh-m...

And many corporations have cut ties with election objector Republicans: https://fortune.com/2022/02/15/political-donations-corporate...

For actual corporate donations, those go through PACs. https://www.opensecrets.org/political-action-committees-pacs... shows the split by party and year.
there should be ways to achieve this.

examples would be:
Multiple PoWers independently producing solutions and then verifying each other (although this is wasteful as work is being duplicated)

PoWers achieving increasing status levels when not cheating over time, incentivising long-term honest behaviour
Apparently the way this kind of research is pursued today, one starts with one or more respectable worldwide databases of oral traditions, and identifies a collection of apparently similar myths by noting various sometimes-shared features, or motifs. These are entered into a phylogenetic tree analysis.

This is the same thing biologists use in teasing out genetic lineages of more or less related animal, plant, or fungus species. The output is a proposed "this one came first, and spawned this or these others", all down the line. Biologists cross-check this against a timeline and geography. It is easy for such an analysis to go wrong: garbage in, garbage out. Its results are always, "assuming (the input), (the output) is the best fit for paths of descent."

Different people invariably produce different input and get more or less different output. But often certain aspects of the analyses are robust across unrelated analyses: birds always show up in Dinosauria, mammals never.

For oral traditions, you generally expect to see a geographical progression from a central point of origin, with progressively different versions in oral traditions taken farther away. For something like the Pleiades, where once seven stars were discernable and later six, you may see details appear to account for the change. Such observationally shared details need not trace to a single parent myth, and so may introduce noise to the analysis. But where similar accountings appear, they might each be traced to an origin.

All this is very difficult to make rigorous, but often curious relationships emerge that no one had noticed before. These may then be checked against other data. One such is connections between stories told in Oceania and in South America, which need to be accounted for. Waves of migration may appear, as later arrivals may displace earlier versions except in less favored environments.

The same process is used in tracing language evolution, where instead of oral-tradition motifs, cognate words and pronunciation shifts are tracked. And, it is used to trace genetic relationships among groups of people who have migrated and settled the globe. Comparing genetic, language, and oral tradition analyses helps to strengthen all three.

Genetic similarities between people in Tierra del Fuego, at the southern tip of South America, and Australian aboriginals may be accounted for by these migration waves. Peculiarities in languages in western Europe and central Asia, likewise. In each case the details are presumed to have once matched throughout the range, but have been displaced by later forms except at the ends.

Anyway that is how I understand it. I have not performed any phylogenetic analyses, myself.
I don't understand this, aren't the AMX instructions[1] an example of an Apple-proprietary ARM instruction set extension?

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32722510
Developer work is expensive and beyond most users abilities. File..save is not. It is very different.
The "boy genius" cliche in Silicon Valley journalism is flawed and sometimes unhelpful, but it's not because it's strictly limited to "the rich and affluent"? Not sure where you're (or the author) is getting that.

Vitalik wasn't some rich kid who went to Harvard and was groomed by VCs. He was gambled on because he had some interesting ideas.

The fact the media loves Mozart types also doesn't mean that their cliches are true or representative of the culture either. It just shows what the readers of Wired and pop-science want to hear.
Eh, code also takes a whole lot of time to get right, and AI will reduce that significantly.
I had no idea that PC Magazine is still alive.
BTW we are looking for MEs, EEs, and a physicist
https://pocketbase.io/ may be of interest to you
Hey I was there, too. For those in the area this is an event you cannot miss and this year it was packed. I went there with my 15 year-old, he spends a ton of time on Xbox so it was great to see him enjoy playing with a PET, Sinclair Spectrum and the C64.

So it’s not all old timers who love these old machines, the new generation can enjoy them, too. Given that it’s a mystery why some company just build and sell a C64 / Amiga/ Sinclair clone for a reasonable price. Next batch of YC anyone?
Wow EVGA was my favorite company
Need more opinions on this. His quote is from a pdf which you have to download from [1] which is on the page the tweet links. His conclusion is not obvious - at least to me.

[1] https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/cyber-resil...
The government follows the processes of the government. That's how it works. Keep in mind, there is literally 1 mention of the Supreme court in the constitution. It says Congress can "ordain and establish it". It doesn't say anything about Congress authorizing the Supreme Court to decide the outcome of elections, which is what happened. So if we strictly stick to this idea that somehow one election is this critical, then the US government ended back in 2000. The electoral college results were basically just discarded by SCOTUS and Bush was appointed president.

Your argument is that "Republican governors" could follow the processes of the government to somehow influence an election. I don't even think what you're describing is possible. But if it is, well that is the government just following it's own processes. If that makes you upset, you apparently feel that our government is not legitimate. The Republican vs Democrat vs whatever is irrelevant. If the government decides it doesn't like the outcome of an election & throws it out, that's the governments choice.

You're in the same boat that somehow champion's the idea the Roe v. wade is the "correct" decision of the Supreme court on abortion. Guess what: the supreme court basically just goes with whatever is popular at present. You love the idea of the fairy tale high school civics course where the US is some bastion of righteousness & freedom. How many times did the Supreme Court rule that slavery was all fine & dandy? Apparently enough we fought a war over it and had to get Congress to authorize amendments explaining that slavery was in fact not OK.
This is how BOINC and similar distributed computing projects work: a unit of work is distributed to multiple workers to confirm the work and discourage malicious actors.
Pocketbase: Open-Source Back End
I was also on lamotrogine for a period of time and the cognitive decline was real. Not only was memory affect I also suffered from severe brain fog. Years later I still feel as if I haven't recovered completely from it.

Lithium works great but it's not a good long term solution as years of use is terrible for the kidneys.
Making solar available to apartment dwellers/multi-tenancy housing. We switch a shared solar system to different circuits based on who's currently using power, to optimise on-site solar usage and reduce feeding back into the grid. As well as having some interesting electrical issues, there's an amazing world of regulatory bureaucracy to wade through. https://allumeenergy.com/
I don't understand why you're still pursuing this argument when Kremlin has dropped the NATO pretext quite a long time ago. According to Putin[1], now it's a special operation to liberate Donbas from their Ukro-Nazi overlords. The Russian PR machine has recently been struggling to find better justifications to this pointless carbon copy of a 19th century colonial war.

As a result of this war, Finland and Sweden joined NATO, turning the Baltic Sea into NATO's internal waters, which isolates Kaliningrad and St Petersburg. Ukraine will sooner or later join it too. The whole western border from Sochi to Murmansk (except puppet state Belarus) will soon be in a mutual defence pact against further Russian aggression. So in this dimension, it's been a spectacular failure for Russia.

The argument of protecting Russians in Ukraine has become morbid at best, after Russia razed to the ground several major cities with large Russian populations, many of whom now lie in nameless mass graves. Daily missile attacks on civilians in eastern Ukraine, where disproportional number of Russians live, doesn't help the case either. After the spectacular counteroffensive, which expelled Russians from Kharkiv region, they have nothing left but threats of widening the war against civilians in pursuit of scorched-earth policy.

So what justifications of this war remain? What halftones are there to discuss? That maybe there still remain some undiscovered arguments in support of blowing up hospitals and power stations?

[1] https://twitter.com/DAlperovitch/status/1570808500053475331
Is it tweak or a hack?
For the past year I've been paying the bills (this is hardly my first startup) but we're just starting to talk to investors to bring some more staff on and start scaling up. We only need a few million for this stage.

There are people who pay for GHG removal and we have plans on how to expand that. We think it can be self-sustaining.
My sister does a fair amount of Craigslist-like transactions, but she abandoned Craigslist years ago, in favor of Facebook Marketplace, for this exact reason. She had a few scary situations from sketchy people via Craigslist, says that never happens with Facebook Marketplace.

(My sister flips baby strollers as a side-hustle. Seriously. She makes money with it, too. Not enough to retire, but enough to keep her home, raising her kids. She's been doing it since her first child was born 12 years ago, when she realized how expensive decent strollers are. She buys broken strollers for near-nothing, keeps an inventory of her own replacement parts, fixes them herself, then sells them. New mothers love it, because, once again, baby strollers are friggin' expensive.)
Tron Legacy
Agreed, people are sheep, and will pay through the nose for crap they are taught carries some sort of cultural cachet. See also Apple products, and various handbags.
EVGA needs Nvidia, Nvidia does not need EVGA.

So this is either business suicide (Doubtful), a publicity stunt or an attempt to get the community to take side in a pricing beef between Nvidia and EVGA.
Rexpaint: ASCII Art Editor
Personal social credit manager. Every business you interact with will run an automatic background check on you based on all the data you've leaked on the Internet. Without a long history in the tracking databases, you'll be flagged as a bot or a suspicious person. So to live in such system and still have some privacy, you will hire a manager for your fake online persona who will specialize in generating plausible and inoffensive engagement metadata for your identities.
Thanks @tdeck, that was my naive guess, too. It seems so imprecise, I assumed it was a bad guess :) cheers bud.
And/or a really long spring:

https://www.nshos.com/HAMMOND17.htm

I have a couple of these lying around, but they're useless in a portable application.
I think the reality is though that is is extremely difficult to find a job that would pay a comparable total comp in all cash. You choice isn't 200k cash, 200k rsu vs 400k cash since the 400k cash offer doesn't really exist. What is more, at least in Europe and Australia and ignoring tiny seed stage startups, the places that give out substantial equity actually pay MORE in cash than more traditional, regional companies.
Yeah, in previous discussions I've seen about HTTP/2 Server Push, it seems like a lot of people are confused about what it was and thought it could be used to let a server spontaneously message a client (like you can do with websockets or server-side events). The only thing Server Push does is let a server respond to one request with multiple responses together ("I see you're requesting X, but I know clients who ask for X end up asking for Y shortly after, so here's Y with your X so you can cache it for later").
I think that extra cash gets taxed at regular income rates.
I've lived in a number of European countries and have had dealings with banks as both a private and business customer. The whole article sounds very different from what I would consider a bank branch in Europe.

Here a bank branch is basically a physical way of dealing with customer service. The people you talk to in the branch are no different than the people you talk to on the phone, they don't have any real power in decisions, they are just navigating the paperwork and submitting applications that someone/something in HQ (which may even be another country) makes a decision on. Some branches don't even deal with cash, you can only use an ATM to withdraw and deposit.