skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> By progressing development just one day further, they have proved development of the whole brain.

If you progress development to 20 days (gestation period for mice), do you get a live mouse? I assume not, but the article doesn’t tell us what happens to the embryo if you continue the experiment.

> UK law permits human embryos to be studied in the laboratory only up to the fourteenth day of development.

The restriction on human embryos seems to imply that non-human embryos are not restricted the same way. So I presume they didn’t terminate the mouse experiment for legal reasons.
People are still feeling the pain, and are still complaining.

I suppose when GCC and MSVC will both support modules in an interoperable way, these same people will enjoy and praise this development.
> "Hey Twitter, please block this crap" is users trying to block what they don't want to see.

No, it's users trying to censor what they don't want other people to be permitted to say or see.

Twitter users have a "block" button; they're free to use it, and thus limit what they themselves will see.
IIRC there was a case in NZ that seemed likely to have come from a contaminated package of imported food.

The difference between zero and near-zero is essentially irrelevant anywhere with community transmission, but it does matter anywhere with a working zero-Covid policy.
Stable Diffusion in TensorFlow / Keras
Its not a dog whistle, its just a whistle. Judges have the politics of the politicians who appoint them; why else would the politicians appoint them?

Frankly, it’s extremely naive to assume that judges are apolitical.
It's not complex, it's a great example of poor resource allocation. For how much we collectively spend on healthcare, there should be no perform finding it. The resources are going to the wrong place (profit, insurance, admin).
No, I'm thinking of indentured servitude. Which requires them to be indentured, via said contracts. You are agreeing with me.

Uber is the antithesis of being tied to a job. You have complete freedom to engage whenever you wish. In fact it is precisely this freedom that "they should be employees" proponents are attacking.
I ought to check it out this year. Where’s your favorite place to go?

I’m thinking of how last year wasn’t hardly any snow and quite a few meltoffs in the east (where I did most of my skiing because of all the madness at the resorts all over). And the year before that worst avalanche year in memory for Colorado, if you do any backcountry
On M1 Max Mac Studio I'm getting about 45s. On my 3080 Ti about 5-7s.
Reserve currency status isn't decided by what countries use to purchase oil.
Binary Lambda Calculus is indeed beautifully simple [1].
LISP is rather complex by comparison, but then it's full-fledged non-esoteric programming language.

[1] https://www.ioccc.org/2012/tromp/hint.html
Sometimes it is best to let your employer shoot themselves in the foot. It is often less stressful than arguing with them. I've certainly heard "I don't pay you to think" and "we'll do it my way because I say so" more than a few times. By the time I reached 25 or so, I just decided to roll with it because I was there to get paid and not to win any battles.
There is a famous quote from Kenneth Boulding
“Anyone who believes in indefinite growth in anything physical, on a physically finite planet, is either mad or an economist."
Honestly though, a proper prediction with various inputs is more accurate than eyeballing a barometer, and aside from this particular type of migraine, why would anyone need to know the pressure during the normal course of one's day? (Assuming your work doesn't happen to use environmental pressure.)
Is there a UDP equivalent to passively monitor and fingerprint? I'm guessing not, but would be interested to hear if there is.
Partly true, you don't want totally free radicals either :)
Will the residents just not have cars? Or are the streets going to be lined with cars? How does this play out?
Let me explain it in a way that you might understand:

1) there are kids in the schoolyard.

2) all the kids are free to move around; they can talk to anybody else and do things to have fun.

3) a kid can decide to punch another kid; but the unwritten laws of the schoolyard prevent that, because the other kid might throw a punch back.

But now ...

4) a group of 5 kids decide to bully a kid that is standing alone.

How is this possible? Why don't the unwritten laws of the free schoolyard protect the kid?

Good thing there are teachers around to regulate the schoolyard!
I stand corrected. However, in the US, gluttony is certainly the most deadly sin.
Seeing copyrighted/trademarked icons in the examples (Darth Vader, for example) really makes me wonder how these models are going to play out in the future.

Today, these models are far ahead of the trademark attorneys, but there are powerful interests that are going to want to litigate the inclusion of these entities in the trained models themselves.
Comments are ranked based on the number of upvotes they receive and when they were posted. This unfortunately means that the first comments posted have a tendency to receive upvotes and down out all others even if they are completely wrong. HN could alleviate that effect by rewarding more recently posted comments more. After all, if an article takes 30 minutes to read, the comments posted in the first 30 minutes are probably not very useful.
Some dams have additional capacity for flood mitigation, like Wivenhoe Dam in Queensland. Unfortunately that’s not fool proof either: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010%E2%80%932011_Queensland...
Imagination Technologies sold off MIPS in 2017 [1] - while RISC-V might have been a thing back then, it was certainly nowhere as known as it is today, and well before any decision to focus on RISC-V.

Interesting in that Imagination have since announced RISC-V cores [2], but that's unrelated to any of the MIPS tech, and none of the MIPS engineers worked on it as the project started well after the sale.

[1] https://www.imaginationtech.com/news/completion-of-sale-of-m...

[2] https://www.imaginationtech.com/news/imagination-launches-ri...
I've actually updated my response with two more arguments just before you posted. I think it addresses some of your other questions here.
Gitui's README mentions that Lazygit freezes and sometimes crashes parsing large repos, taking the example of the linux repo, and reports that Gitui is more than twice as fast: https://github.com/extrawurst/gitui#3--benchmarks-top-

At least for the stability issues, does this match your experience?

I see others have mentioned tig here as well, I'd be curious to hear if they also find it somewhat slow and unstable. Gitui's linux benchmark lists it as being almost 11 times faster than tig.
Who among us doesn't face that choice?

I work or I starve. If I don't work, and I don't starve - someone else must be working.

If someones sole and only option was to work for Uber: Is Uber the one at fault here?

If Uber didn't exist and person had zero options, would this be neutral, worse, or better compared to the former scenario?

It's not a fallacy because people have different moral standards about whether you should be employed at $7.25 or unemployed at $15.

Personally I consider it my absolute right to mow lawns at $5/day if I choose to do it. If you think I'm not making enough money, you can give me more! Don't force the people alreaday paying me to pay more.

The EITC gives more benefits than any minimum wage will and more than any 1099 law reform.
I don't know the answers to all of your questions, but

>Can you write assembly embedded in Rust code?

Yes, I've done this several times. It looks like this: https://doc.rust-lang.org/rust-by-example/unsafe/asm.html
"that is not the same as muzzling"

They are actively blocking stories about Biden. Actively filtering stories about negative aspects of COVID vaccines. They are actively filtering stories about inconsistencies in the 2020 election - "The most secure ever".

They are amplifying stuff - absolutely... but they are also censoring free speech because "corporations are allowed too".

"If you tell me something and I don't tell anybody what you told me, does that mean I "muzzle your speech"."

No... but if you post a story and your account gets banned for stuff that's later found out to be true (IE: hunters laptop and the New York Post RIGHT BEFORE AN ELECTION)? that's absolutely muzzling speech and suppressing facts.
The syntax:

void hello(auto msg){
...
}

Is legal today (since C++20 IIRC) and it is equivalent to your first example.
Most people think overweight means “obese or morbidly obese”.

Overweight is a very easy target to hit.
Yes, it turns out that professional vetting institutions have biases.

If those biases appear partisan, it may be the case and that they are partisan for a reason having to do with the nature of the professional expertise that and the lack of said expertise on the other side of a partisan divide.
How will this affect winter temperatures in Europe, wrt limited gas supply?
> do you have SSE/AVX intrinsics (others?)?

Yes. https://docs.rs/simd/latest/simd/

> Can you write assembly embedded in Rust code?

Also yes. https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/inline-assembly.html
> It's like speed-limits. You can only drive so fast. Similarly we should limit how many dollars any single person can spend on manipulating public opinion.

Does this apply to all advertising, or just "political" advertising? Is "Enjoy Coca Cola" the acceptable kind of "manipulating public opinion", or the bad kind that is limited? Who draws the distinction?

Is Shell or Exxon allowed to advertise their products? Are they allowed to advertise their products in a positive light? Are there spending limits on their just, like, normal product advertising?

Can I air anti-oil and pro-clean-air advertisements? Are these "political" even if Shell's aren't?
It's still fun even if you aren't hyper optimizing and playing perfectly with every mechanic
Reading some of the other top comments should give you some idea.
That's the founder and CEO at the time, he created the reddit culture and he did the worst thing you can do in that situation: silently editing the posts of people you disagree with. Nobody said that post was proof that lots of admins do this, but it is proof that Reddits leadership is rotten to the core. If the CEO is fine with editing others speech to make it look like they said things they didn't, then obviously he is also fine with unfairly banning people or communities he disagrees with since that is a much lesser evil.
> Even if that's the case, I'd like to see the argument that those people who chose and choose to work at uber have worse outcomes than they otherwise would.

It only takes one common situation, right?

They go into debt on the vehicles they lease from the company or from an agent. They were given deliberately incomplete information about how much money they would make, so taking into account all the circumstances, they wind off worse than they would be at a standard, legal job. In other words, "by some process" of deception, they wind up below minimum wage.
Being purely functional makes this quite easy, still a beauty to see
SIMD intrinsics exist, although currently require nightly compiler on non-x86 targets: https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.29.0/core/arch/x86/index.html

Inline assembly: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2873-inline-asm.html

Performance is almost identical, even the linked benchmark is quite even.
Plastic Might Be Making You Obese
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-09-11/plasti...
This does not sound to me like an issue of free speech more of one of you abusing an online service. Use of a bot maybe is against the services tos. So it’s not the content of your message rather the method you abused to spread it?
Dropbox is only useful if you are using it for just one computer.

I tried using it for syncing the files on several computers at one time. Instead of adding files to the computer that was lacking them so that both computers matched, it deleted files from the computer that had them so that both computers matched.

These days I just use 'rsync' instead.
Thanks for the pointer. gpg is the better option then, I've switched to it.
Everything is a statement, intentionally or not. The characterization of what is mundane is itself a political statement.
I think Paradox games tend to scare people away by leading them to think that all of the minutiae of their mechanics matter far more than they actually do.

It seems incredibly complicated at a glance, but as you say a lot of the details might as well be inconsequential unless you're somebody obsessed with min-maxing your game experience.
the green new deal packaged up with a deceptive name? It won't do anything.
mpv can do that too: mpv --vo=tct {file}
(3) doesn’t come from (2), but (2) doesn’t negate (3) either. There are people in (1) who are desperate, when (2) occurs those desperate people freely choose this opportunity. Whether this opportunity is exploitative needs to be argued outside of (2) or (3).

Here are two example of how society doesn’t allow certain freely chosen compensations schemes. (A) suppose one could offer money for organ donation, we would see increase in donations. As a society we do not allow it because it is exploitative. (B) More extreme, suppose someone could offer money for the right to kill a volunteer, with enough money I’m sure there would be volunteers, but we don’t allow that because it is also exploitative.

The OPs (2) is less extreme than my (A) or (B), but I hope my examples show that (2) and (3) can be both true.
Zfs. lots of snapshots.

cd .zfs/whatever the nearest one was, copy it, done
“Obesogens" In Plastic Might Be Making You Obese
You’d monitor Twitter and try to build predictive models for whatever it is you want to learn (stocks?).

Part of the key would be able to detect the “dogs that don’t bark” - Twitter accounts you previously identified as being tied to a company suddenly not saying things for example.
One of the functions of computers is to provide entertainment or evoke positive emotions. Many people use computers to explore and consume art. The reality is that people value how things make them feel. Even outside of entertainment, design and form can improve function when done right.

Sure, bad designs that inhibit functionality are bad. But good design that enhances it are better than no design, so removing good designers from a pipeline is a bad thing.

In my opinion, products driven entirely by developers with no design sense are just as bad as those driven by designers with no development sense. The solution involves good teamwork between both parties.
Yep tig is my world.
Do you believe it? Solar+wind has had several notable failures so far when overcast skies combined with windless conditions. Hydro probably helps to a great degree though.
How many transportation deaths are associated with ~1,000 works showing up every week to a nuclear power plant for 50+ years?

Ballpark say 1,000 people * 30 total mile daily commute * 365 days a year * 50 years round to ~1 billion miles driven over the lifetime of a power plant in the US should represent around 13 traffic fatalities. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_vehicle_fatality_rate_in...

Let’s call it somewhere between 5 a 25 transportation deaths per nuclear power plant, meanwhile large solar farms are often completely empty of people 90+% of the time.
How is anything the poster stated not measurable? We can measure the rise of ocean levels, the rise of global temperature, the number of people on said coasts etc...

Take off your tinfoil hat for a quick second.
> It seems like in terms of subjective productivity, memory-unsafe languages have going for them a lot. Otherwise how do you explain so many programmers still willingly choosing them?

Honestly? And this might be a hot take - exactly the same way as I'd explain people rejecting structured programming way back in the day. It was the new thing on the block and people were not used to it, and preferred to just sprinkle GOTOs in their program just like they always used to do rather than learning a new paradigm.

As someone who used to professionally program in C++ on an expert level in the past and now has completely switched to Rust I can tell you that (at least subjectively for me) Rust is way more productive than C++ ever was. Once you internalize how the language works the limitations of Rust just disappear. You learn how to instinctively write code that's idiomatic, and it just stops slowing you down. But it also gives you a ton of new features that end up speeding you up compared to C++, e.g. sum types, pattern matching, cargo, great standard library, destructive moves, proper modules, #[derive], good error messages, etc. Memory safety can also be significant productivity boost because you can (or at least I do) just churn out code without thinking about it too much and just rely on the compiler to make sure that it's memory safe. Can this code trigger use-after-free? Is this iterator valid? What's the lifetime of this pointer? Instead of thinking about all of these you can use those brain cells for something else.
I agree with you but in a situation like this it’s a lot better to overreact than to underreact. If we do more than we need to, we get cheap solar panels, long lasting batteries, and maybe a lot of time and money wasted on ideas that didn’t work out. If we do less than we have to, we get a possibly irreversible feedback loop of global warming that leads to the collapse of most habitats (including ours) on this planet.
No more baubles
It makes for great agitprop: play as cardboard characters of perfect virtue or absolute evil.
I’ve been using dropbox across three computers since a few months after they were founded and have never once encountered this problem - and if I someday do, it’s a matter of seconds to undo deletions in Dropbox.
From a quick look, roughly 20% of the models on sale do have that.
Curious: I don't see the `^` op defined, or is it translated inti `exp` im guessing?
Built in TV audio has always been bad. That said some TVs are starting to use the screen as a diaphragm now, which is interesting.

It's not "by design" so much as bad audio setups are going to sound bad, and a lot of people don't know how to shop for or care about it.
Do you get a headache on an airplane when it’s ascending or descending?
As I understand it modules support goes beyond just compilers - yes you need support there, but also in libraries (std library still is still not available as a module yet but apparently in progress) as well as build tools (CMake, Bazel, etc.).

People are complaining because it’s 2022 and support for modules is seemingly not there or incomplete in all these places, and modules are talked about in some C++ communities as if they’re a thing that is actually usable (for example Bjarne’s talk at Cppcon a few days ago).
Similar quote in a more recent video:

Removing type checking from your running programs is like wearing a life jacket for your practice emergency drills and then taking it off as soon as your ship was really sinking

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYkOWzrO3xg

Maybe that was right in the 70-80s, but I feel like he's not giving enough credit to modern static verification / type-checking.
Good stuff! I miss Phab’s task trees and stacked diffs
Kinda. It supports consistent snapshots but they are not easy to access or copy or ... except through TM. It ends up closer to VSS or LVM in usability, though it doesn't have to be since the architecture is better.

ZFS is likely the canonical example of a system that makes constant snapshots easy to use and access and deal with.

BTRFS is also not bad
This is an interesting approach. Haskell is not a symbolic language, but you take advantage of the abstractness of type parameters in function definitions to thread your implementation of "D x" through, and pattern match on that.

It's a neat design pattern. I bet it'd work in Julia too.
It’s doubly sad because Supreme Court decisions are exceptionally easy to read. You may not be able to get all the legal references but you’ll be able to at least describe the arguments, if not steelman them.

But the reality is nobody really cares (and perhaps never really cared) as the outcome matters most and justifies anything.
I've always found rocket mass heaters to be quite interesting. One day I'll get around to making one. I'm in an area where I might be able to use it a couple weeks out of the year so it's not much of a priority.
There's lots of Library of Things projects around the country, but they're usually informal mutual aid type events. I think something much better organized and funded (maybe even some nice software to go along with it) could make a huge difference in our waste crisis

Also, we should be charging people for their trash. Both companies and consumers imo. It's kinda ridiculous to offload so much waste as an economic externality. I live near a university and every year I get to watch a new set of students move into the student housing. Towards the start of the school year the dumpsters are filled with Ikea and Amazon boxes form all the new furniture. At move out time they have to bring these absolutely massive metal containers (like 3x the size of a shipping container) for the students to through out all their furniture (most of which has been used for less than a year). It's particularly bad with this university since a fifth are international students.

80% of the furniture in my house was "rescued". We used to hoard it and sell it on Craiglist and the like. We once sold a $200 marble table we got for free. Also have two pairs of working air pods and a bunch of $100+ shoes (including some Jordans and a pair of Yeezys) that we just haven't gotten around to selling yet. We also have a bench press and weights, 2 working grills, and too many office chairs. All this and we still save every glass jar and use them as our cups.

Unfortunately, my housemates are not big fans of the mismatched furniture look, but I find it quite charming :(

It's wild how much waste could be averted if all that furniture was simply stored on a plot of land over the summer until the next wave of students came in and then we let them pick through it. We used to pick up everything we could sell, but it just became too much of an effort because of the sheer volume of furniture
Wait, so you mean a bunch of wild assertions posted on the internet were in fact false? But I did research!

Thanks for making my point.
Rust editions can technically change some aspects of the language semantics, but this ability is used sparingly. An example is how the `iter` method on fixed-size arrays changed in the most recent edition. As long as code from all editions can still be used together, a semantic change is possible.
tig rules.

gitui does not support vim keybinding for me, or I did not find out how.

rust's size always surprise me:

tig -- 600KB, gitui: 11MB

similar size pattern for other utilties, in general, rust executable is about 200x larger than its c/c++ peers, and, they all linked to similar c/c++ libraries, looks like rust stdlib is pretty big in size to me.
Ask HN: What are your favorite personal sites?
Share personal sites from other people that you like a lot.
Fair Chance Act
Ok, maybe bringing everything into the global namespace is a bit of a stretch, but you could at least do the most common ones. Who's going to alias cout or string?

As for std::get, while it's a separate issue I think the problem that solves should be solved in a more elegant way if you're trying to reform the language anyway. This is not elegant:

std::get<0>(arr) = 1;
People in cities need rarely cars. In the us it may be news, but in europe you can buy grocerys and use the bus for going shopping and coming back.
This ruling appears to apply to the content of speech. There's nothing that says you couldn't rate limit replies to prevent spam. Limiting posts to 1 per 30 seconds, or linking the number of replies you are allowed per day to your rate of organic interactions with other people would be a way to effectively eliminate these sort of bots without censoring based on content.