skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think it should be more like: "Every day you get faster/stronger/better. But every day will be just as hard as your first day, and you gotta do it every day."
None yet. There is RISC-V vector extension, which is certainly different, but whether it is better is unclear for now.
In the context of the ad, I'm thinking they want people who don't make excuses. People who power through and take responsibility for their results. I think there's an extreme where that is abusive, but the opposite end of that are those who are quick to assign blame ("It's not my fault we are late! I didn't know the dependencies would conflict!") Somewhere in the middle are those who are dependable and find solutions.
> you're safe in voting against it (which, obnoxiously enough, can sometimes mean voting yes)

Sure but if you literally cannot understand it, it may be difficult to determine whether voting against it means voting yes or no.
If somebody is commanding high profit margins in a locale it seems obvious that raising minimum wages could have benefits for most people. Given the examples in the US of wage increases largely happening in high CoL, high earning cities though, is it likely to be the case that applying the same playbook to less advantaged communities will have the same effects? In particular, would you not expect that a typical rural community has businesses with low margins and thus couldn't afford wage increases without major changes somewhere?
We had bounds checking GCC twenty five years ago.

https://stuff.mit.edu/afs/sipb/project/bounds/src/gcc-2.7.2/...

I played with that; it worked.

In the 90's I reached for Bruce Perens' Electric Fence; that did a good job for me.

We've Valgrind for some two decades now?

Call me unexcited ...
I've never seen it before either, but there's a hiring post right now:

> Flexport is hiring smart, gritty People who get stuff done

I'm more concerned about the capitalization of "People".
Step #1 - Strong arm the business and hardware team into putting a ton of ram on said embedded device together with a relatively up to date SoC ARM core

Step #2 - Run Linux on it (preferably with in-tree drivers)

Step #3 - Application development is now Somebody Else's Problem

On a serious note, unless your power envelope is tiny or you have hard real-time constraints, you really shouldn't be pushing small microcontrollers to the limit and running custom networking stacks on those. That's a security disaster. Don't connect things to the internet if you don't have a reliable way of updating the firmware.
So what did you do to get the most performance out of the system? pin the threads to specific CPUs?
NanoFORTH
By that logic anyone who reads religious texts should be reading them in their original languages, such as Aramaic for the Bible.
>you see a bunch of elf children acting like stereotypical human bullies.

I have the exact same complaint with star trek discovery which showed Spock being bullied by Vulcan children. They even had the elf ears
Interesting, I never knew that was common.
When I read this I think they are looking for (beyond those desperate in need of a job) greater fools - the clueless under the Gervais principle, the shleppers who will take on the risk disproportionate to the reward, the Kool aid drinkers. There is an analogy in every culture for this I am sure.

Edit: OK I know that sounded cynical. In all seriousness if you are not a coaster and are professional about putting in your fair amount of effort and having a delineation between work and life, what "more" is gritty supposed to signal and what is the price one is paying for it?
https://www.legis.iowa.gov/docs/code/910.3B.pdf

Perhaps there is a concern that the croudfunds could be considered a third party payment under subsection 4.

The only explanation that I can think of for the subsection was to prevent a defendant from claiming that a source like the decedent's own life insurance should be counted against the restitution, but that seems a bit far fetched.
It was actually a 6.9 https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us7000i90q...
They killed too many people earlier in the episode, the ratings board wouldn't allow for that much dramatic tension at TV-14 :p
Does anyone know what is up with the 8275CL? It looks... almost periodic or something.
Do you remember that 7.2 a couple years ago? Much closer to Taipei then these Hualien quakes. That felt really sickening to me. The ones yesterday I felt pretty sick for a while too
Was that Discovery? I thought that was the 2009 reboot movie.
Yes, that's the only reason I can't use Wayland as well. The touchpad becomes unusable and as I'm only using that for my work, it's extremely frustrating. Can't seem to be able to aim at anything, tried any configuration possible. Wheel momentum is gone also and doesn't pick up micro motions as synaptics + X11 do. The screen looks great though, graphics and motions feel much better, it's amazing to look at, but it's unusable.
I think we can find some middle ground between understandable-by-dumbest-person and "impossible to comprehend".
From the PDF [1]:

> We cannot prohibit speech that some experience as offensive or injurious. (...) A commitment to free expression includes hearing and hosting speakers, including those whose views or opinions may not be shared by many members of the MIT community and may be harmful to some. This commitment includes the freedom to criticize and peacefully protest speakers to whom one may object, but it does not extend to suppressing or restricting such speakers from expressing their views.

Reasonable stance IMO. As far as I can tell, MIT did not adopt the Chicago Statement [2], so it's nice to see a proposal like this, which seems substantially similar.

[1] https://facultygovernance.mit.edu/sites/default/files/report...

[2] https://provost.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/documents/r...
‘When Eero Met His Match’ Review: Making Saarinen Soar
Before even opening your social media app, ask yourself, “Am I a better person by knowing the news right now, rather than next week?”
I have one definitive inbox. Each morning, I go through the other inboxes (email, Slack, texts, etc.). I do the tasks I can do immediately, like replying to an email asking a question I know the answer to. The ones I can’t, I copy into my main inbox.

oncretely, I use Things for my to-do lists, and can easily drag an email into it (or use its Mac hotkeys) to make a Things inbox item like “Reply to Joe about the Foo project”. Once everything’s in Things, I schedule them where appropriate, or move them into projects like “Work > Icebox” to come back to later.

The core principle is that I have one place to look to know what I need to do. This works for me. The other option of having multiple active inboxes fills me with dread and I can’t operate efficiently like that.
The point here is that risc
V will do the same to arm that arm is doing to x86, therefore arm shouldn't underestimate the competition.
Good fun, but not intuitive for people who drive on the left-hand side of the road (the somebody at bone/somebody at flower path assumes right-hand drive). Occupying the same space also feels wrong - I didn't even try this until both bunnies had to go onto the carrot.
> As more people buy bitcoin, it's cash value goes up, and vice versa.

Ignoring mining, every purchase is a sale, and vice versa. Lots of new people could buy bitcoin and its price could drop in the process. What you maybe mean is something else about supply and demand?
> Microsoft announced a labor neutrality agreement with the Communications Workers of America – which has undoubtedly become the most successful tech organizing union. According to the announcement, “The foundation of the agreement is a commitment to mutual respect and open communication.”

> Due to the neutrality agreement, Microsoft was now “a friend of the labor movement”. (A later phone call elaborated that CWA is an affiliate of UNI and helps pay UNI salaries. And that any critique of Microsoft could lead to one or more UNI employees being fired.)

> UNI’s demands were clear: either remove all material except the critique of Amazon or hide UNI’s funding. (It was suggested that Tech Inquiry wait six months before publishing its analysis of Microsoft and Google.)

This makes CWA and UNI seem like farces; tools used by Microsoft, Google and Amazon to neutralize the threat of real unionization.
He sold rabbits to restaurants located in California, which excludes the local rural-only argument.
Launch Apps from the Lock Scren
I updated my app to work with the iOS16 Lock Screen. Launch a selection of apps straight from the lock screen. Check it out, feedback is appreciated!
If it was a chicken and rabbit I think I would have tried to overlap them
I've seen similar arguments like this before, which of course have their own set of counter-points from the other side of the debate. Both sides are unverifiable because they're trying to predict the behaviour of complex interacting systems. We're in the middle of a big experiment and the only way to know for sure who is right is to wait and observe.

I won't bother to respond to his core argument because it has been countered plenty of times before and as I said above it's ultimately a pointless endeavour to debate, but I did want to pick out what I found to be the most egregious part.

> Bitcoin was a phenomenal first attempt, just like Blockbuster was amazing while it lasted. But to think that we nailed it on the first try is crazy. I cannot think of a single piece of technology that hasn’t been improved for the better over time. Would you prefer to use a computer from 1988? A tablet from 2014? A car from 1932? Would you attempt to fly across the Atlantic ocean in the first airplane ever made? Of course not. Technology gets better with time. Period.

This is an outstandingly poor take from someone who clearly doesn't know the history of "e-money" or understand the core promise of Bitcoin, and is a common argument by "crypto defi bros".

The first, but lesser problem is that... no, Bitcoin isn't the first attempt at "digital money". The whitepaper specifically references previous attempts, why they failed, and how Bitcoin addresses those shortcomings. Bitcoin was just the first, arguably, successful attempt.

The second, but more significant problem is that the author thinks "crypto" is the new technology that's just starting out and being evolved here. Perhaps it is in a way, but that's missing the point. The technology been evolved here is almost as old as civilization itself.

Money.

Money has an incredibly long history of evolution through various technologies from stones on the island of Yap, shells, cloth, glass beads, ledgers, and yes, gold and other metals. In the modern age we saw paper certificates appear as IOUs for gold, then this link was severed in 1971 by Nixon, we saw the emergence of credit cards and e-commerce which all come with their various advantages and disadvantages.

So framing Bitcoin as the "first" of a new technology is recently and historically... wrong.

There's also the argument that the design space of money is limited. Bitcoin arguably fills in the final properties of money that needed to be improved on from gold (salability across space and divisibility) and fiat (scarcity i.e. salability across time). Vijay covers the properties of good money in his well-known article [1] (now book) better than I could. If you buy this argument the logic goes that there's not much more room for improvement when it comes to money.

But who knows what someone might think up next...

[1] https://vijayboyapati.medium.com/the-bullish-case-for-bitcoi...
ARM not worried about RISCV in a market that ARM only just joined
Hate that people or losing their jobs. However, the frankness of this message was refreshing. Hopefully everyone lands in equal or better situation.

I was spared in the last recession/downturn and all I can do is hope for the same and keep myself prepared in the event that I need to look for something new.
Part of the problem (as I understand it) is that this series is being directed by first-time showrunners. Amazon took a big gamble, and I would not be surprised if some of these cinematic/writing failures are the result of that.
No way this isn't a dumb aquisition. They could have cloned it for a very small fraction of the cost.

Would they get adoption? Yes, they are the biggest player in the space. 20 billion for Figma is insane
Not everyone has the skillset required to do that, and in a small team you may not have anyone with that skillset.
I'm reminded of https://www.foonathan.net/2022/08/malloc-interface/#problem-.... While initially I was skeptical of the author's criticism of C's allocation APIs, this bug seems to be one that could've been avoided by using the proposed try_expand() instead of realloc().

Of course ideally we'd move away from provenance-based UB and Rust's third-class aliased mutability, to simpler conservative aliasing semantics by default, and allow programmers to opt into non-general optimizations by manually saving unchanging values like vector::size() into locals, or have the optimizer and programmer interactively explore code invariants and optimizations, making the optimizer a performance-focused pair programmer rather than a black box.
The situation is not the same at all.

The few people alive today who actively still use cursive to write are just as equally capable of handwriting in a block or printed format, it's not a language or even a dialect.

And nothing of import today is written in cursive. (Not books, or literature, or legal texts, or contracts, nothing)
Better have some science and civics too.

I think the challenge is less about the mechanics (reading, writing) and more about the content expressed via these, as there has to be some element of common content as well.
I always heard it was an attempt to keep anyone using the rail for carrying cargo or other comercial traffic. They had concerns folks would sabotage their growth in order to resell the lines later.
Every email ever sent from anyone working at rsync.net is sent with (al)pine.
If he were wrong, you'd have been able to formulate a better response than tone policing.
Lots of examples of open source replacing closed-source in recent history, hardly any for the other way around. Plenty of examples of proprietary becoming open-source as well. The only trend that runs counter to this is the emergence of SaaS, most of which rely heavily on open source themselves.

It's hard to compete with established FOSS, which is why companies tend to embrace and build upon it, strengthening its position even further.

The web stack is full of examples: Web servers*, OBS killing everything else, ActiveX, Flash, Mosaic, and also lots of smaller examples related to how we interact with various file formats/codecs.

If you wanted to start developing a new closed-source web server, streaming software, alternative to ffmpeg, programming language, compiler, browser engine, or even mobile operating system, people would probably call you insane. Trying to beat the open-source incumbents with something closed-source and possibly paid looks impossible.

* I am amazed Microsoft IIS is still barely hanging on.
If you watched Star Trek Picard you might have an aneurysm.
I once had an office job where HR encouraged employees to watch a TED talk about "grit." It's a word recruiters seem to like these days.

I don't think it reveals anything really about the company. Just expect that the first round of interviews will be pretty generic I guess.
Anything that involves motor control creates more neural pathways, they could just as easily spend that time drawing or learning to paint, and the children will probably have much more fun which is an important aspect of learning.
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck...
Exactly and a play for corporate strategy.
Core architecture is the easiest part actually, there's plenty of high-level core designs available in the open. Turning that broad architecture into real products is a lot more challenging, and is where shops like e.g. SiFive can thrive. But that's just how fabbing chips works, it applies to RISC-V as much as anything else. And we'll probably see even more openness than that at the trailing edge of chip fabrication - the relevant segment for e.g. commodity embedded parts, where there's a far better understanding of processes and design rules.
This engineering idea/concept/design is WAY older than "westworld"

Look at japanese engineering that implemented the same concept for their castles... WAY THE HECK earlier...
Philosophy; mostly ethics and logic.
I think one thing that sort of disappeared was the vision of thin clients everywhere. X11 is an obvious thin-client solution.

Thin client for home use seems like a winning proposition. Rather than giving the kids a Raspberry Pi 400 or garage-sale P4 when they want their own computer, you could hook up another X terminal to a large shared Ryzen box. The hardware gets more efficiently used, files can easily be shared and centrally backed up, and nobody ends up being the guy with the cast-off or otherwise inferior PC.
I bailed on Noteplan when the author doubled the annual subscription price to $120. I switched from Obsidian to Noteplan because I greatly preferred the native app to Electron, but it’s not that much better to justify costing $70 per year more.

I do love how Noteplan handles daily notes, and used Shortcuts to script up my replacement app of choice to emulate my favorite bits of it.
Actually yes! I've helped children with almost any challenge short of, say, Down Syndrome.

In short, children who don't learn to read or write well in school almost certainly would not learn to read or write well when unschooled, but most unschooled children who don't learn to read or write well do learn perfectly fine in a traditional schooling environment.

Schooled children who don't learn to read for different and harder to deal with reasons, a quick top 3:

1. English as a second language (ESL)

2. Learning disability that was never addressed

3. Severe behavior problems that interfere with schooling (this is often caused by problems at home)

These problems are exacerbated by parents who are poorer or themselves ESL.

Unschooled kids, conversely, tend to have relatively affluent parents who speak fluent English. Overwhelmingly, the reason they can't read or write is that either no attempt at teaching was made, or it was made with no reference to educational theory. This failure mode is much rarer in schools.

P.S.
I don't want to give the impression here that I think the US education system isn't a tire fire or that there aren't different pedagogical approaches that might be radically better for most children. I'm just saying I have nearly a decade of experience showing overwhelmingly that "unschooling", even when performed by some of the most educated and affluent people in society, fails overwhelmingly compared to even the sub-par experience of standard schooling in the US.
X2GO is the way to go!
You might want to measure yourself, because the table of results there doesn't make a lot of sense to me. 4-5 of those methods should be dominated by context switch latency and thus clustered together tightly.

I looked at the sources. The pipe and fifo benchmarks also send a signal on every message, so they're not measuring what you'd expect.
Are you sure there is a cap? There were a huge number of Stanford and Cal accepts my year and literally nobody talked of caps.
I do agree that talent could be drowned out at a school like Gunn, whereas you might stand out more at a less prestigious school.
>For everyone commenting "laypeople aren't the intended audience"

Why not though? Do laypeople not have to follow these laws/contracts? Or do we expect everyone in the modern age to have a pocket lawyer available to them?

If the average person can't understand the rules that they must follow then there's really no such thing as "law and order", there's only selective enforcement.
It means they want people who have the traits of a startup founder. Whether the compensation packages they are offering are also reflecting this is a different story.
Saying "Bitcoin is not a Store of Value" is not the same as saying "Bitcoin has no value," because of course it does as long as people think it does.

I translate the original title to "Bitcoin is a terrible store of value", which I already knew, especially since the 75% drop in value. Yes I know, it's gone up a bazillion percent since 2012, but trees don't grow to the sky and saying otherwise is the kind of thing they tell suckers at casinos along with "There's only 21 million that can ever be mined so they are guaranteed to go up due to scarcity that can't fulfill demand." The demand part of the equation is unknowable and could go to zero.
I came here to say "only Philadelphia hockey fans need apply" ... haha!
I mean there's STEM, and there's the reality that Computer Science is the tent pole discipline that people mean when they say STEM. And Computer Science doesn't actually need much more than English in terms of infrastructure
These are the scores for the ballot measure that Texas voters were supposed to vote yes or no on.

So absolutely yes. When you're asking people to vote on something, and you actually want informed voters, I unquestionably want ballot measures to be understandable by everyone that reads them.
Nomachine used to be open source. X2Go is the open source continuation of that.
I think that's one of the Intel chips where the cores are connected on a 2D grid rather than the more hierarchical or single ring interconnects you see in the other systems.
Only one quote comes to mind:
War is an extremely easy profession, waging war is extremely difficult.
Not to detract from the overall point, I got a pretty decent wikihow as the first result when I searched. It was amp-hosted and wouldn't be suitable on a low-bandwidth connection, but it wasn't anywhere near as bad as I've been conditioned to expect.
Are they're existing employees not doing that, so that's why they need to hire such a person?
What "stupid decisions" are you identifying with the last 50 years? I can't think of a unifying theme in that timespan.

Whether or not the thing we call "universities" continues to exist into the indefinite future is not of particular concern to me.

The primary thing I'm concerning myself with in this conversation is the recurrent and myopic belief among the HN commentariat that everything, especially anything that isn't STEM, needs to fit into the bottom line of some profit structure to be worth any of society's time and effort.
The thing I dislike about Wayland is: Sometimes the server will crash. Video drivers or something. Hasn't happened much with 22.04, but used to happen more frequently before. Both with Intel and AMD.

When this happens in X11, the server restarts, I see the screen go black for an instant, that's it.

When this happens in Wayland, all my open programs are killed. No save prompts or anything, just insta-killed. This makes Wayland unusable unless they can guarantee no crashes, ever.
So those are facts, but what is the point that you’re getting at? Are you making the case that their successes were inherent in them, or that their motivations were shaped by some experience unique to them, or were they just destined to be such by history?
Not looking forward to the Millennium Tower in SF footage when the next big one hits there.
> Good fun, but not intuitive for people who drive on the left-hand side of the road (the somebody at bone/somebody at flower path assumes right-hand drive).

Both have to be occupied at the same time; it’s not directional.
I'm into tech as a hobby, not as a career, so take this with a grain of salt:

Android ate every other mobile OS excluding iOS, in part because it was OS and close-enough to free for OEMs. I can't even think of a closed-source webserver off-hand. Even the fine people at Redmond had to offer Linux support on Azure. The vast majority of the web runs of FLOSS.

FLOSS wins when working with OEMs. Only with consumers does the new-shiny-proprietary win.