skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Rust's Editions specifically only change the concrete syntax, although there have been hacks to make some stuff that would otherwise be impossible become possible by retrospectively making how things used to work a special case, and of course if some feature needs syntax then you can't use it from an Edition which doesn't have that syntax (e.g. async doesn't exist in Rust 2015 edition)

Here's the guide explaining the most significant hack:

https://doc.rust-lang.org/edition-guide/rust-2021/IntoIterat...

There was a proposal to do Editions for C++, Epochs, https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p18... but it was not accepted.
I've thought about this a little bit. My pet theory is that taller kids tend to be taller adults, and taller kids tend to be treated more maturely and given more responsibility than smaller kids.
I don't get it. Restaurants can choose their customers based on how they behave or even how they are dressed. Why shouldn't online businesses be able to reject some of their customers?
You can look up the Wikipedia article on almost any comparable ship and see how much it cost to build. I have done that for several examples, and I would guess that a passenger ship compliant with all current regs and standards and carrying ca. 3500 guests would cost ca. USD$1 billion. So that’s roughly the adjustment for inflation. Also adjustment for the new regs and updated regs since Titanic.
Yeah, I agree. Maybe we can salvage the discussion though.

Nathan Fielder graduated from one of Canada's top business schools with really good grades. And famously, his American green card mistakenly identifies him as a woman. There must be something there.
We get there by a (very likely) short-term increase in current energy production and use as we ramp up manufacturing and deployment of the systems needed for clean energy production, and then see a tapering off of the current production methods as the new ones come online.

How did we get the first railroads built? By a combination of horses dragging materials so humans could lay the rail lines and then trains dragging materials as the initial lines were built. There was almost certainly an initial increase in horse power consumption, and then a decline as the new system came online. This isn't a new thing, this is how many replacement transitions that depend on the previous system play out.
Interesting article with incel HN description
real admins use mapnik

https://github.com/mapnik
ouch is it just me that feels

int i = 0; // pretty

i : int = 0; // ugly

i will stick to c++03 thank u very much.
The mission was to create connections between shipmates and comrades-in-arms who couldn’t get together physically due to the COVID crisis. We hosted over 80 weekly Zoom calls that brought together thousands of people who learned together how to activate a powerful network they ALREADY had, but hadn’t learned how to leverage.

Running RINGKNOCKER was an incredible experience, all the more so because I was able to do it from my home on the island of Bali!

Like all good things, RINGKNOCKER eventually ran its course: attendance dropped as the COVID lockdowns came to an end, and we decided to finish on a high note rather than run it into the ground. While the RINGKNOCKER operation is firmly in the rear-view mirror, the community and I continue to benefit from the connections we made during that time.

I’m a software engineer by trade, and I won’t pretend to possess some arcane secret about running great events. But if RINGKNOCKER taught me ANY important lesson about hosting events, it’s this one:

Brilliance is a nice-to-have. NOT SUCKING IS ESSENTIAL!
Jeez, save some exclamation marks for the rest of us.

If what other people want is bad, inequitable, wrong, or unjust, then wanting the good, the equitable, the right and the just is politics itself.
It's perhaps naive and over-simplistic, but the s-curve is so well-established you can probably fit the production cost curve over time to the s-curve and get a useful prediction.

There's lots of hard work that goes into making it happen, of course.
https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/11583528?hl=en

Universal Analytics will be going away

Last updated: March 16, 2022. Visit this page in the coming months for the latest information.

Google Analytics 4 is our next-generation measurement solution, and it's replacing Universal Analytics. On July 1, 2023, standard Universal Analytics properties will stop processing new hits. If you still rely on Universal Analytics, we recommend that you prepare to use Google Analytics 4 going forward.
I like posteo.
It's almost as if we've become socially accustomed to editorialized social media shared headlines that are intentionally crafted as rage bait to drive clicks and engagement for advertising revenue. Gee, I sure do wonder how and where that might have happened...
Right, instead of shaming it’s healthier to promote being your best self (carrot vs stick). I wasn’t able to be shamed out of addiction to cheap snack food, but I was able to change after I changed my mindset and the habit just didn’t fit my new tenets, my self-perception.

Society is so sensitive though that any message of improving yourself is interpreted as “shaming”, which hurts the individual.
Almost no one is going to give up the benefits of consumer protections because of the possibility that their government is out to get them. Thus I don't see how any of this is relevant.
As the ancient saying goes, "Mens sana in corpore sano".
I see what you're saying-- Bootstrapping a green economy does, almost by definition, require the use of fossil fuels.

I think the easier way to look at it, though, isn't the upfront cost of the transition, but the outcomes that are 10-20 years down the line. A big "spend" right now should result in less overall carbon emitted (according to most of the lifecycle analyses that I'm familiar with, anyway).

It's a really good point that we need to optimize this, of course. It would be ideal to manufacture solar panels in places with a favorable energy mix versus somewhere that's still 100% coal. But in a lot of cases, it's better just to get the things out the door as fast as possible using the technology we have.
"A" beauty premium persists not "the" premium. I've only read the highlights but that reads like there's a dropoff for men, but not as steep a one as for women.

Edit: This'll teach me to read the whole study. The conclusion has this to say:

>This finding implies that the female beauty premium observed when education is in-person is likely to be chiefly a consequence of discrimination. On the contrary, for male students, there was still a significant beauty premium even after the introduction of online teaching. The latter finding suggests that for males in particular, beauty can be a productivity-enhancing attribute.
> Yeah, there are a lot of us.

I wouldn't say a lot, I've never met a fellow philosopher/developer in person. I would expect there would be more!
You can’t be serious. Are you serious? Spam is not censored. You have access to it. You click on the spam folder and you can read the spam email in all it’s glory!

And before you even mention auto deletion, you can disable that. I think that should be opt in not opt out but, yeah, spam in not being censored.
I'm a guy in his 40's and you didn't actually supply me with any advice apart from "do as I say"... I see a lot of that these days. I've no idea who this Elliot is and don't really care - if you want to provide advice at least provide some substance.
I don't understand your point or what you are responding to :(. The issue at hand is whether the concept of a spam filter violates the position of these laws, and I do not think it does as long as the spam filter is not a universal configuration that is forced on everyone. As long as you can either deactivate the spam filter entirely or whitelist specific senders (though I can make more elaborate arguments where this isn't quite sufficient due to bias) / specific content (which should be sufficient), then I believe that Google's spam filter is not the same thing as "moderation" which deletes or blocks the content for everyone, whether they wanted to see it or not.
I think because they are simple enough to understand, to design and build without pro-level skills, and there's quite a bit of software, documentation, and even peripherals out there.

E.g. the Tynemouth Software kits:

https://www.thefuturewas8bit.com/shop/tynemouth-products.htm...
Okay, still working on design.
Now it's possible only filter by gender, age, and location. For this moment chat doesn't have database to store appropriate data to filter "bad chats" and users.
Who is "they", though? Aside from the spam filters, posts largely make it to the front page (or not) due to community moderation. YC isn't the one making those endorsements, the moderating population of HN users as a whole are doing so.
I mean, I agree with you (I just said sometimes people call it that, not that it is that) but I don't think anything you said really contradicts it being a kind of capitalism. After all Lenin and Stalin and Trotsky disagreed literally violently with each other but Soviet Communism is still a label that contains all their efforts and systems.
Even writing: https://newlearningonline.com/literacies/chapter-1/socrates-...

But there are still plenty of book clubs, I was in one for years, and I read a lot of books and talked about them. Books I wouldn’t have picked in a thousand years but were none the less fascinating, and easier to finish what with the group effort.
Back then, as in the early years ot the PC, software was mainly self-contained, single-executable extract-and-run.

Somewhere along the way, they became so complex as to require special installation programs and the like.

I'm not very familiar with AI and SD in particular, but from what I understand, this stuff is mostly-pure maths, so it shouldn't be a difficult thing to package and make portable. I know the models are rather large, but that's not really any additional complexity.
I think there's a reasonable argument to be made that the problems surrounding platforms regarding their control of censorship & free speech would be largely resolved if that aspect were decoupled. You may also think that the tying that bell and the railroads did with their respective infrastructure is 'natural', but that was made illegal and those platforms were forced to break up, so I don't think its appropriate to dismiss this issue offhand.

I'm not interested in hashing out a complete argument and coming to a vacuous conclusion with some other random on an internet forum, I'm just saying that there seems to be a reasonable argument to be had in this direction.
Never used ABnB but why do users care about their guest rating dipping? Do you get charged more or denied properties if you have a lower rating?
People never behave how we are supposed to behave. AI will be way better at behaving properly. The minute AI lovers exist a huge percentage of the population is going to give up on human lovers entirely. No cheating, no fighting, emotionally stable. Proper conflict resolution. Although AI does get weird sometimes.
Does it though? As someone who used MD raid for absolutely everything for over 10 years, were now switching to HW raid. EFI / GPT disks just don't work that well with OS level raid, because the motherboard is well within it's right to modify the EFI partition, which if you have raided at the OS level will cause massive issues.
You are absolutely correct.

Supply Chains are primarily fossil based and can NOT be substituted with low density sources like Green Energy or even electricity at all.

For example, you can't efficiently make steel or most other metals with electricity alone. Even primarily electrically refined metals like copper or aluminum REQUIRE inputs that can not be made or refined or extracted with electricity. Often this is about chemical reductions that required carbon or other reductants that can't be effectively or efficiently made with electricity. The most obvious one is silicon - carbon reduction of SiO2 is the only and best efficient refining method (1st stage only - you need further far more energy intensive refining to make semiconductor-grade silicon).

Recently brought up in Congress was questions of how petrochemicals are to be produced if the Green goal of eliminating oil is accomplished. Stuff like plastics. All sorts of things depend upon plastics and plastics require petrochemicals. The most obvious one is plastic sterilization aids and sterile materials like syringes, packaging for needles, etc. ALL 20th century medicine is largely destroyed without petrochemicals. Also all pharmaceuticals deeply depend upon petrochemicals.

The respondent had no answer and she simply tried to resort to high-intensity angry BS. Clearly she'd never thought ANY of this through and didn't care because she was living off the anger of hating oil but knew nothing about how oil is used or how dependent all supply chains are on oil.

You are underestimating the good faith of the political class. In fact, they are borderline psychopathic with high levels Dunning-Kruger delusion about the correctness of their decisions/beliefs.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHk7S6prF6M

The additional issue: PVs have finite lifespan. Lithium batteries have extremely finite lifespans. So you have to replace them and have ALL the supply chains to do that forever. Which are fossil fuel dependent at fundamental chemical/physical levels. So most of those supply chains can NEVER be made green.

Green Energy is primarily a Cargo-Cult Religion not based on facts. That is a major problem because if you shutdown fossil fuels, we will end up with nothing - we will not even manage to have the levels of civilization and technology seen in the last 300-500 years. Basically a dark age.
And when I diet I do feel more will power and am not in auto-pilot, and am more likely to say no to other things I don’t want to do
Not wanting to add to the title, but if HN had a subtitle, this would be it:

"The effect is only present in courses with significant teacher–student interaction."

I mention this because I initially wondered if looks drove general confidence, and that somehow made them better students. But the subtitle implies that instructors have a bias in favor of looks.

That said, now I wonder how the gender and/or gender-preference of the teacher influences the bias.
I’m a PhD in one of the highest CoL cities in the US, so I wouldn’t say I’m speaking from a position of particular financial privilege
> That's capitalism.

Don’t worry too much about capitalist ideals, we should be willing to bend the rules as needed to promote a system where there is healthy competition and innovation.

If we can do un-capitalistic things like bail outs and PPP schemes to help businesses when their chips are down, we should be able to handicap them when things are in their favour, to help new businesses challenge them.
> delves almost immediately into elliptic curve cryptography and one-way functions.

It reminds me of Kun’s primer on probability. The primer jumps to the definition of probability space and measure in the first few paragraphs: https://jeremykun.com/2013/01/04/probability-theory-a-primer...

A good primer, nonetheless. Just not necessarily accessible to majority of programmers.
A moral system that doesn't allow one to break the law for any reason, no matter how good the reason is, can hardly be called a moral system at all. Obedience to the state is not a functional moral code.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03595-0

you can live in your own wishful thinking fairy tale where models make "conclusions" but over here in reality we have to live knowing that extinction is a possibility because veering away from equilibrium means you cannot predict in the first place.
it looks like most cities in the world -- excessive, 24-hour, advertising and safety with electricity.. the external costs of everything fossil-fuel are not at all inline with the reality of what is happening with Climate now
Fintech is about automation, not revolution says Brett Scott
Possibly, but in isolation it’s impossible to tell. Weather is a series of events; climate is a statistical phenomenon.

But basically yes, all bad and exceptional weather is caused by climate change, at least in terms of moral equivalence. Many people somewhere is suffering from climate change, and you should pretend that it’s you, because you want to have the mindset that it has hurt people most everywhere.
Ah, so CVS is like GIF, git is like MPEG without keyframes, and Mercurial is like MPEG with keyframes.
AI will handle this one.
That's not the argument of peak oil. It's not about price or quantity of oil available in the planet. It's an argument about thermodynamics.

The argument is that in order to extract oil, you need to spend energy, and, logically, the most easier oil to extract is extracted first.

That means that oil extraction is every year more expensive (energetically not financially). Because technology can make extraction more efficient but not indefinitely, at some point, in order to extract oil, it will be necessary to spend the same energy than burning it creates.

I suppose we could say that it's kind of an inversion of what's going on with fusion research.

Some commenters say that we already pass that point and that's the reason oil companies CaPex have fall in the last years.

I don't know if that's the case, but I can't avoid to ask myself about solar.

Is the energy that a solar panel generate in its life enough for its normal use, plus extracting the minerals that it's made of, plus push the panel, through the ocean all the way from China? or are we fooling ourselves using oil for all that?

I would like to see some numbers and expert discussion about that.
Not in that age group but I can't imagine not having cc on. I was hooked when watching anime and foreign movies but even with english movies they only have an upside. You don't have to guess what word they said or how someone's name is spelled. Loud scenes where you can barely hear them is one but also when you have characters that have accents or switch to a different language it helps (you don't get distracted by the sudden need to read cc).

You have to get used to it but it only takes a few tries.
Man, I wish I could get into 4X games. Stellaris and CKII are games I've tried to put "tutorial time" into, but they don't catch as much as Factorio or Rimworld.
> We should be allocating Li carefully until those issues are resolved in 5-10 years.

Well intentioned policy like this can have the reverse effect.

If you limit lithium usage you will limit demand, which can reduce the effort expended to build new mines.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-scientific-funda...

There is no hard and fast rule, but on average the pretty ones tend to be more intelligent.
No. Fossil fuels may be more energy dense But they need to be extracted, refined, transported and warehoused.
The costs of greenhouse gas emissions through their environmental side effects are not even part of that calculation.

In the meantime, a wind turbine keeps generating energy as long a there is wind. We can't deplete wind or ocean waves as a resource.

The more we invest in renewable energy, the more efficient per follar speny it becomes.
Looks like it does now
...Comet? Is that a joke, lol? Because of the Ajax and Comet cleaners? I've never heard that term before
> I can't run a spam filter on the Twitter app on my phone

That's nothing fundamentally preventing this. It's Twitter themselves who've decided not to allow you to do this. Were their app more open to extension you would be able to download and configure a spam filter of your choosing.
Excluding the "Doesn't" from your quote to negate my words is very deceitful. Do better.
Wouldn't remote vs in-person differences control that?
C++ was one of the first languages I learnt as an undergrad, maybe 20 years ago. I used it for a few hobby projects but not much else (professionally these days I mainly use Typescript & Go). I'd love to pick up C++ again but I've found it really challenging to discover what I should read up on to know what modern C++ should look like. What's a great resource for someone who's been out of C++ for a couple of decades to pick up and learn today's idiomatic C++? I don't want Rust btw - it's a great language but I want to revitalise my C++ knowledge, not jump ship entirely.
Pydantic uses metaprogramming to generate runtime validations according to the field type annotation.
I can also confirm this, the elixir community is by far one of the most welcoming communities that I have ever seen!
Could also be survival bias in the sense that bias against the height challenged eventually leave only the taller to lead.
I used to work for a company whose product was a fairly large satellite control center software system (and we could supply hardware if needed), written in C++. It's used for a lot of commercial fleets. For example, back in the 2000s, when I worked on it, it was used for CDRADIO/Sirius's fleet. (I don't know if it's still used for SiriusXM's Sirius satellites, if any.)

I liked C++ in some ways, but as a whole, I think, C++ didn't reduce -- and may have increased -- the complexity of our software compared to the complexity of an equivalent C implementation. (I'm talking about the complexity of the software itself, not the complexities of the tasks it was doing.) The distribution of the complexity in the code would just have been different between the two implementations. IMHO.

So I mostly stick with C or other non-C++ languages now. Of course, C++ has expanded and changed greatly since then.
I've been saying for the past year, sensationalist submissions like the OP to the front-page are the norm on "H"N. Quite disappointing, considering I believed this website was once a source for high-quality information, but now it's almost as if I'm logging in on my LinkedIn home page.
Messing with anything RSS should be considered terrorism against the Internet itself.
I'd certainly prefer to keep each microservice in its own repo.

That way in a reorg, the services can be redistributed in a way that makes sense without having to make code changes.

Having two monorepos where you only own half of each seems like the worst of both worlds
This is a game I like to play: whenever I see an actor in a big/expensive production that I feel is a bad actor, I try to figure out how they got the role.

90% of the time, you can just go to their Wikipedia page and see that their parents or aunt/uncle is a well connected Hollywood type. The other times, you'll see paparazzi shots of them partying with 65 year old dudes, who end up being big Hollywood players. Because there's nothing attractive 20-somethings like to do more than party with people who are their grandfather's age.
You'll be able to go to a different platform that does allow decentralized spam filtering then
> We might not be producing enough right now, but there's far more than enough that can be mined or recycled inexpensively.

That's not reality but a dream. So far we still have to find a sustainable lithium recycling on scale, there are various startups with various solutions, who actually prove to be just like most startup: PR scam for money or childish dream of someone who sold the cat before capturing it.

It's not better in mining estimation: we have estimations of different kind but they are nothing than dream, we do not really know how much lithium is accessible on earth.
We all should move to https://www.hcaptcha.com/ or any other provider who is not Google.

They are spying on all.
I don't think that's accurate. I don't think anyone believed that joining a company would -- for example -- mean that they were no longer allowed to make financial contributions, individually, to political campaigns.

Citizens United affirmed that it was ok for corporations to use corporate funds to make political speech via financial contributions. Not allowing that would not imply that people who work for a corporation have lost their individual first amendment rights.
What is this obesession with the funcname() -> type syntax? I just hate it