skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Thanks, I am already down to 4W after Eco mode, disabling remote start and a restart -I sometimes use the Chromecast so going to leave it on.
I don’t want to be rude to Adobe employees here — I’m sure they have lots of excellent people — but Figma is quite a technical tour-de-force for a web-based app with very good execution and a tailor-made, unique stack. Cloning it might be harder than it may appear.
Thank you for inspiring me to dig around.

However, the only thing I found for Android was:

ViPER4Android FX For Android 12 & 13 (rooted only?)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOeNGy-xhxs

https://www.xda-developers.com/viper4android-v2-7-new-ui-pro...
So because the computer doesn't understand English, or because the terminology is often new and constantly changing?
I use the terms merely to distinguish between 2 classes of people. Do you think that this is an unrealistic distinction?

Here's an example. Meditation discussion in a context free of conventional models. It's nigh impossible to find such conversation without getting knocked over the head with citations of Buddhist/etc dogma. On the internet anyway.

(Also, I said "ignored or shouted down". Not just "shouted down". See, you have chosen to focus on the extreme, easier to refute, case. In fact, twice striving immediately for the refutation.)
Boxed software Microsoft: if it breaks, then Microsoft is wrong.

FOSS and new Microsoft: if it breaks, have you tried pulling the latest? Yes? Then it's a bug in your expectations.
Sure, but this is what Joe Average already does with Latin.
You are right. /s/ Here is a good example: <<Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons>>. If you choose to reply to this post, please carefully consider how Black and Brown Americans would feel knowing this was deeply embedded in this history of their country's founding document. (It is horrible!)

This segment is widely called the "Three-fifths Compromise" in American English. It refers to the fact that enslaved people would be counted as 3/5 of a person for the purpose of determining gov't representation.

From a modern perspective, this section is wholly demented and supports the institution of slavery. This support for the institution of slavery in the founding document of the United States is a terrible stain upon its reputation.

The biggest issue I have with the US Constitution in a modern society: It is too hard to change. (When is the last time the US had a serious effort to pass a new amendment? 1970s / 1980s-ish: Women's equality, but still it failed!) Many successful, younger democracies have found ways to allow non-extremist changes to their constitution, to support "futurism" (my own term) -- the progression of society. Personally, I am a big supporter of regular (frequent), small changes to a country's constitution to support, and facilitate, social change.
Indeed it is not a rigours experiment by any stretch of the imagination. But the difference in scale in response (and the fact his profile looks earnest) we have an interesting data point on bias in academia.
If you don't use live TV, consider using an external HDMI switch (or a receiver) so that the TV can stay on a single input?
Yes, which is why they generally have no power over the production beyond eliminating their own demand. So how exactly are you suggesting that a consumer should zero out production?
Anyone who’s been on the Internet long enough will have wisened up to the fabled YouTube link ending in in XcQ.
Graphics are definitely upgraded even if it's an older build. The volumetric fog is the same one as in RDR2 https://imgur.com/a/BKGj0vH
“Whatever you now find weird, ugly, uncomfortable and nasty about a new medium will surely become its signature. CD distortion, the jitteriness of digital video, the crap sound of 8-bit - all of these will be cherished and emulated as soon as they can be avoided. It’s the sound of failure: so much modern art is the sound of things going out of control, of a medium pushing to its limits and breaking apart. The distorted guitar sound is the sound of something too loud for the medium supposed to carry it. The blues singer with the cracked voice is the sound of an emotional cry too powerful for the throat that releases it. The excitement of grainy film, of bleached-out black and white, is the excitement of witnessing events too momentous for the medium assigned to record them.”
― Brian Eno, A Year With Swollen Appendices
Majority of my tech learning relies on Text and Video Tutorials on Youtube and off-course documentation. Last book I bought was DID(Data Intensive applications) 3 years ago. Prior to that I did not buy tech books for 10+ years.
Sentence 1: ok, valid take.

Sentences 2,3: really funny (assuming it was deliberately ironic), considering "loose" -> "lose", and using an adverb to end a sentence, while critiquing grammar... ;b
I was lucky enough to get in on this when the boards were ~$130. It’s one of my favorite pieces of tech. It “just works” and the UI is very good. Updating is super easy and it even goes and grabs the MAME Roms for you. CPS2 games feel much different than my MAME box running Arch. I can 100% pick up the controller and I’m a few seconds know which one I’m playing. The video processing presets have some that make the games look amazing. Psx I mainly play rpgs so latency isn’t a huge deal there.
If anyone has any specific questions let me know. I think they are twice the price now but even at that I would probably rebuy. I use it probably 8-10 hours a week so worth a good investment.
I read many technical books as ebooks (epub or pdf), but these are primarily about "current tech" that will most probably become obsolete in 2-3 years. But I buy real books for more fundamental technical areas, where the information will be relevant for a long time. Another factor is if the book is math heavy - around deep learning & related topics, although in many cases PDFs are ok.
I didn’t need to, there’s only one video that makes sense, and the “…XcG” seemed familiar
> Respect

is a two way street. Teachers routinely blame the parents for any failures in the classroom.

> safety

absolutely.

> adequate resources

I never learned more than at Caltech where the material was taught with blackboard and chalk, and the students used pen and paper.
It's a good thing that at 10 or 17 you're not able to enter a legally binding contract where signatures would be a thing.
Do you know why the other post was flagged?
No.

You’d find more information on the real person.

But the news might be bad.
I might be wrong about this but I think cursive is a very specific style in America, whereas in the UK "joined up writing" is less restrictive. Maybe that's why they make such a big deal about it. Probably why it has such a clumsy childish name here too - nobody talks about it as an adult because it's just "handwriting".
I was just about to make this same exact comment! I was half way down the page and thought, "Wait... What language is this again?" I had to scroll back up to confirm.
Ask HN: How to Learn Basic Botany?
I enjoy looking after plants, but I'd like to learn the principles of things like pH, Nutrients, Soil Biome, etc. What is a good source to get started learning?
This is the same in any advanced academic field. Ever tried talking to a sociologist or a philosopher?
> Ethereum isn't democratic.

That is because it is a business, not a government elected by people. And I'm fine with that. It's not too different from credit card companies. Problem of course is if it becomes a monopoly.
Fair point, but if all accounts were given a standard default policy modeled around current moderation rules, and users were permitted to edit the policy from that initial point, this would be an effective solution.
Once a message is deleted there is no way to recover it, to my knowledge. But message retention in Slack is infinite. Further, sessions are infinite, at least last I set it up.

I think we set something like 1 year of retention for "public" channels, 9 months for private, and then certain channels can lower it beyond that. Same for files. And we have our tokens expire once a month.

The defaults for Slack are pretty insane.
Good for them. No one is trying to stop anyone from using cash. But the 19th century doesn't work for everyone.
> Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing else to take away.

> Antoine St. Exupery (author of the little prince)

"(author of the little prince)" could have been taken away.
I'm 30-ish and not from the USA, but all of my generation has been taught cursive and used it all the way through college - even though I went to a computer engineering college. Some people's handwriting was using some more print letters (for example, I mostly use print capitals, but cursive for the small letters, with some exceptions such as y or x).
I felt a bit of irritation regarding the price at first, but after giving it a second thought and understanding it was based on OS lib, got okay with it.
It sounds like a bold statement: "Learn to program or pay."
Like it!
I've read the decision at length. If you had done so as well, you would see that this line in the syllabus comes verbatim from the majority opinion. 547 U.S. at 60. I cited the syllabus because it occurs first and has less pagination markup, making it more accessible to the average HN reader.
Nice basic introduction. For anyone wanting a comprehensive overview of each command, with examples (and generally more readable than man pages), the computerhope site is good. For example here's wc:

https://www.computerhope.com/unix/uwc.htm
Show HN: An ORM for PHP that understands your table relationships
Looks nice. Can you explain what exactly "full stack" means in this case? I see "Auto live reloading using virtual DOM in development mode". But not production? So it's not doing any SPA-style client side DOM updates?
Eh wow thanks for then tip (aerc) beeing a user of neomutt i definetly will try that one out.
No, I don’t buy tech books. They helped earlier in my career to build my intuition but now I find tech books too high level and repetitive to be useful. At this point my intuition is strong enough that I’ve seen and understood most concepts at some point and the nuances and syntactic changes are the most important. All this said I find ebooks very difficult for reference material. Indexing into them is clumsy for me - I assume it’s mostly inexperience - but indexing into a physical book is a pattern I’m well familiar with and do it effectively. I’ve raised my now 8 year old daughter with an ereader her whole life with the goal that she become so facile with the tool that when she goes to mars and they’re conserving delta-v she won’t be at a disadvantage.
Any chance you can find the link to the dead post? I am curious to see it.
Seaborn – Python library to draw beautiful statistical graphics
I dunno, Phabricator is mainly popular in companies (since it's an easy self hosting option) so they're basically selling support.

My company paid, and I'm sure they wouldn't have donated anything if they didn't have too.

Quite frustrating to not be able to even comment on issues though.
Those were definitely not a big deal (compared to now) and were a very different game back in ‘05
I am confused by this post.

From here: http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/education/all_amendments_usconst.ht...

I see the final amendment:
<<
AMENDMENT XXVII - Originally proposed Sept. 25, 1789. Ratified May 7, 1992.

No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of representatives shall have intervened.
>>

First: Holy Sh-t: This is a long time between propsal and passage / acceptance!

Second: Do I misunderstand? Do you consider this amendment academic? It sounds like reps cannot increase compenstation during their term.
> Socialism is the government providing goods and services, which requires coercion.

No, this is flat out wrong, on so many levels.

First, this is not what socialism is. Go read a few books on the matter, a ton have been written. The short of it is that the focus of socialism is workers and them owning the means of production. Historically socialism has been about fighting against the (existing) government for that, and replacing the traditional power structures (e.g. the soviets/workers councils that popped up in Russia).

Second, a government providing services is called common sense and is a component of everything outside of (very specific types of) anarchy. Goods is another matter.

> Free market means voluntary exchanges

Depends on one's interpretation. E.g. there's a drastic power imbalance in the vast majority of labour relations. That's why there have been so many regulations to restrict the abuses resulting from that imbalance. So an absolutely free market does have a significant involuntary component to it (child/dangerous/very long labour).
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana. Or more generally: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garden-path_sentence

English is so incredibly context sensitive at every level from word construction to paragraphs that words/sentences/paragraphs are meaningless on their own.

You'd need a meta language to describe what the contracts mean. Which is what legal language is trying to be. If software engineers were building it today they'd probably add type judgments to each word/sentence/paragraph to enforce the right interpretation, e.g.

(: ((: (time flies) noun)
(: like proposition)
(: (an arrow) noun))
sentence)

I don't think most people would find that a large improvement in legibility.
I’m unsure what you mean about hardware emulation not being reliable.
Save states is a good point. SNES for example does not have them. Adding that stuff as an after thought is extremely tricky. Most newer cores are creating with save states in mind for two reasons. Makes debugging much easier as you can share states with testers on top of the QOL you get with that feature for end users. PSX for example has really good save state support with rotating save states.
By your explanation, the language is broken by design. It cannot simultaneously not change while also develop shibboleths.
Well, there's a difference between supporting something, and trying to actively shut down any discussion revealing arguments against it.

The best solutions are always compromises born in debates between disagreeing sides. With one side endlessly silencing anything that doesn't go with their narrative, we won't see that happening anymore.
Your premise is wrong. You have not inherited the worst case and tech team you have ever seen.

Two reasons for this: (1) You haven't inherited anything, the business owns the code, not you as an individual. You and the tech team need to work together to to make sure the code keeps generating revenue, and possibly more. No one is owning other people or teams. (2) The code is generating $20m annual revenue. That's pretty cool and not bad at all!

I'd follow the following steps:

1. Start by defining responsibility areas: input, code, output (business value). Any codebase can be modelled in this way. Once you have explicitly defined input and output of your code base, you know what your degrees of freedom are as long as you don't mess with input or output of your application. Also a good way to get to know the stakeholder landscape.

2. Introduce version control, move everything to Git. Git enables a nice way-of-working that is recognized industry-wide. Team work is everything.

3. Start writing tests. Preferably E2E tests that will be stable for a long time to come. In all cases, don't disturb the revenue flow with your changes. This will help you to make changes without having angry coworkers in your mailbox when your change caused existing functionality to break.

4. Fix the low-hanging fruit first. Define a list of maximum 5 issues that can easily be fixed in isolation and will improve the code base. Be sure everyone understands why and how things are done. This will boost team ownership.

5. Improve the codebase step-by-step. Be sure for every improvement to explain why it is important in terms of business value. If you can't explain it to yourself, maybe you are just fixing this for esthetics and it's not really important at all.

And finally, don't go for a full rewrite. Rewrites always seem easy, until you remember that you forgot to take into account all the edge cases the original code base did take into account and it's not as simple as you've thought after all. Instead move parts of the code to a new codebase and migrate slowly from v1 to v2.
I fell in love with roguelikes (or roguelites, never sure how it’s really spelled).

Hades is one of the best, especially with a controller. Gameplay is amazing.

Risk of Rain 2 scratched the same itch for me. A run takes about 30/40 minutes and it has a great learning curve.
I think that it’s pretty relevant that this is from this year’s Ig Nobel prize winner in literature: https://news.mit.edu/2022/mit-cognitive-scientists-win-ig-no...
You mean, like watch for an install of SimCity, and modify the game's files? I don't have enough experience in hardware and PCs to know if that was at all possible or practical.
Yes, you are right, my point is more straight forward in that without the usa stepping in to win ww2, all of Europe would be part of the Reich.
I’ve had the same experience. Watching shows like that with the captions on makes me realize how much I miss with them off.

I’ve had a few instances where I didn’t “get” what had happened; I thought maybe it was just over my head. Turns out, I just missed some key dialogue is all.
What was the western name? I assume the last name was also changed?
How do you get rid of unconscious bias? I am assuming this wasn't malicious and they don't have a 'no foreign sounding names' qualification that they are filtering by, but our brain is a pattern matching machine and if an industry has an overwhelming number of one race/gender/orientation/whatever won't the brain just naturally bias towards that? Even though individuals say they would never be biased, the subconscious element of it seems inevitable.
India is growing and developing quite fast, with that comes opportunity to grow business etc with it which is happening a lot in India as seen by the increasing number of successful startups going up year over year.

So it would be false to think the current or past India will the the same, in next 5 - 10 years Tier 1 and Tier II cities will be quite developed, parts of which would be just as modern as anywhere in the west and in the future decades difference will be almost zero.
> (b) suggest such processing difficulties result largely from working-memory limitations imposed by long-distance syntactic dependencies (i.e., poor writing) as opposed to a mere lack of specialized legal knowledge;

It seems like a misrepresentation to call “long-distance syntactic dependencies” in a legal document the same thing as poor writing when comparing to other genres of written English including those that are written for pleasure. When exploring law the question an individual usually has is “If I do X, does Y happen?”. But legal frameworks don’t cover individual situations, they paint broad strokes over the human experience.
Why not post this to Op instead, after they posted a comment full of irrelevant information? The actual amount of Li found in the crust is irrelevant.
> I assumed multiple conditions were or instead of and

Same, so I tried, and it was very obvious that it didn't work, so, and. Discovering that was, to me, part of the whole experience that makes it rewarding.
Work that's mind numbingly easy to do... Anything that I know exactly how to solve but need to just spend the time implementing.
'"IHG employs a defence-in-depth strategy to information security that leverages many modern security solutions," she added.'

Apparently not.
Cynical question: are there 200+ post doc positions for someone to apply to at one point where their experience and publications are actually relevant?

How many positions is "on the differentiation of the leaf morpho-physiological traits between native and non-native plants on a Mediterranean island (Mallorca)" actually relevant to?
Tales of localhost’s demise have been greatly exaggerated.

Putting aside how much this rings of “owning nothing and being happy”, I’m going to go out on a limb here and say no, cloud-based development will not replace localhost, although with the pace of innovation in that space and tangible benefits that follow, developers will naturally begin to lean on cloud-based workflows more and more. That is, up to a point. It being up to a point is key.

The cloud, as an OS, is not peer to an actual OS. Latency, introspection, isolation, and ownership matter, and as long as there are developers - no, humans - there will be a drive to own, with all the layers of virtualization, mocks, faraday cages, and locally configured quirks and quarks that entails.
The graph drawn here is different from the graph of states: the latter has the cube of the number of these graph nodes, and several edges per node, and would be difficult to draw clearly on a flat paper.
You will find it if you're looking for it, but you're kidding yourself if you think a majority of people in the vast majority of places willingly eat insects
Apple emailed us that we’re 10 times slower than the competition
„There‘s a lot of wrappers, but don‘t worry, everything is generic.” #nsspainx

Love this talk from Matias Villaverde and Rens Breur on SoundCloud’s SwiftUI rewrite

“And then Apple emailed us that we’re 10 times slower than the competition - with a link to a guide how to implement UITableView - this was the highlight of my career.” #nsspainX
Same with academic papers. Most of my efforts go into dealing with constant loss of attention that happens when I have to look up unnecessarily complex words or improperly defined symbols and variable names. I feel stupid until I realize that the paper is actually about a very simple concept. It doesn't have to be this hard to read.
While you’re right…

Create an oxygen-rich atmosphere and you can engineer big-enough land insects.

See the carboniferous for more details.

Also note that if you’re allergic to shrimp or lobster, chances are pretty high that you’ll get a reaction from eating insects.

It was an advisory from last year’s cicadae boom in the US.
In a way, both - along with a third reason. English (like any natural language) is ambiguous and often depends on context. The attempt to "reinforce" ideas in English so that there is no way to have different interpretations is what lands you with legalese. Imagine having to program with that.
I am a lawyer who works with but doesn't do a MASSIVE amount of contract writing like some.

I don't think "poor writing" is the right phrasing here, which implies ignorance or ineptitude.

I think the reason contracts aren't readable to laypeople is because laypeople aren't the intended audience. We all know no one reads these, so we write them to future lawyers and courts who might want to get our clients in trouble. We try to create loopholes for our future selves.