skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I really don't think Redis is a large software system. Things like Firefox, Chrome, AAA games, etc. are what I'd call large C++ systems.
I just googled it and found that "With so many “small towns,” the average local jurisdiction population in the United States is 6,200." why not use that as the limit?
'Lord of the Rings' Used AI to Change Big-Screen Battles Forever
"In 2018, a Nielsen Scarborough survey found that over 37.8 million Americans visited a Starbucks (Statista, 2021) within the last 30 days."

So Starbucks is now a public place?

I don't think so.
Was great in the PNW
Of course they will. What they are less likely to do is to rewrite it in a completely different language (e.g. Rust.) C++ became popular in the first place because it could easily go along with C. No need to rewrite in bulk.
They start with the observation "Smart educated people overwhelmingly vote liberal." and end up at the position "Wow, there's so much discrimination against people who vote conservative"

Perhaps the more obvious conclusion is warranted?

That it just says something very clear about supporters of hateful anticlimate, antivax, and antiabortion politicians?
That's not a "form" of bona fide, however. It's a separate word that means something else.
Yeah and all Hollywood actors are short. And all racing car/f22 pilots have fast reflexes. All labourers are physically strong. Roles are prepared for people who fit.

Height in management is not one of the fitting requirements.
Quite an apt metaphor :)

Now where are the hevc and av1 of versionning system ?
It's an issue because "bonified" means something else. Look it up.
> a corporation’s unenumerated right to muzzle speech ..

That is clearly not based on facts. Corporations simply have a right to choose which speech they will AMPLIFY. That is not the same as muzzling anybody.

They don't knock on your door and say you better stop expressing these views or we will harm you. They don't even harass people online. They just simply choose which speech they will pass on and which not.

If you tell me something and I don't tell anybody what you told me, does that mean I "muzzle your speech". Of course not. Rather it is the case that you don't have the right to demand that I pass on your emails to all my contacts.

This is bad jurisprudence. I wonder, was this judge perhaps nominated by D. Trump?
One of the shops near me can only do tap reading on their reader as the chip isn't working. My debit card only has chip, no tap. But I can pay with Google Pay via my phone. The CVS near me the tap readers in the pharmacy don't work. But the chip readers do.
And at any rate, #1 on HN is not the product of any simple rule like "most upvotes per unit time with some decay function applied." There is significant judgment in expressed in the way that stories are ranked. The source code as of 2012 was enough to demonstrate this, but in my understanding yet more judgment has been applied since then.

https://github.com/wting/hackernews/blob/master/news.arc
“served bills” is not the same thing as “costs” when it comes to processing uninsured claims. The headline is clickbait.
Tangential: I’ve found subtitles to be a very useful tool for learning a language. In order of challenge, I’ll at least watch everything in English with Spanish subtitles, then Spanish SAP with English subtitles, then Spanish SAP with Spanish subtitles, then just in Spanish.
> A Prius looks the way it does because it's designed to be aerodynamic

Nobody cares, people want conventionally attractive such as the Lyriq or the Ferrari 458 or the Mercedes Gullwing or the Ferrari GTO or the new Corvette C8.

The Prius might be aerodynamic and save you 30% energy but still you have the huge inconvenience that once you are done driving you have to hop off and look at it. Same for Teslas. That deplates your mental energy way more than 30%, leaving aside the small detail that mental energy is much more precious than chemical energy.

We have not come this far to depress ourselves with ugliness in the name of functionality, that line of thinking should be applied at the oil well or the battery design process, that is as far removed as possible from the consumer experience.
This is pretty much all financial media, especially Jim Cramer from MSNBC.
Hugely expensive. Zuck mentioned in the rogan episode they spend roughly $5b annual on "Defense" aka moderation and safety. To put it in perspective, that's roughly in line with what the defense budgets of Switzerland and Mexico.
Really thought your link was going to be "draw the rest of the owl"

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/572/078/d6d...
I have migraines triggered by changes in the weather. The last two winters have been the most miserable of my life.

This most recent winter I had a migraine that lasted an unbelievable 63 days starting the day after Christmas.
How is this a social network - the name is literally Wallet /Watch/? It’s just another “copy other people’s trades” solution.
> denied properties

Yes. The host is not required to approve your request to rent. At the end of a booking, guest and host leave reviews for each other. If I'm a guest regularly reviewed for trashing the place, the next host isn't going to want to rent to me.
From their FAQ [1]

I use Akka for an OSS project. What does this mean for my project?

The license offers a customizable “Additional Use Grant” that grants production usage for other OSS projects including Play Framework.

If you are running an OSS project using Akka, please contact us at akka-license@lightbend.com and we will do our best to continue to support your project

1. https://www.lightbend.com/akka/license-faq

Also after 3 years the BSL changes into apache
> Companies saving vast amounts of it in war chests is, IMO (depending on how they save it), as it's effectively removing it from the economy.

Nobody saves money in Scrooge McDuck cash vaults. All the money is invested, all of it. Even money in a checking account is invested. (The banks invest it, that's why they offer free checking accounts. They're not a charity.)

The majority of people do invest in the stock market.

> the lower class

is not the majority. Even so, brokers like Robinhood have made it easy for anyone with a phone to invest.
I think the constant discussion and investor focus around stuff like "when will we get a super app in the US" is ignoring a lot of these factors that I think are pretty path-dependent. Once you build up the app/services ecosystem one way or another, there's a ton of inertia to overcome vs building this up from scratch in a new market.
The standard recommendations to come to up speed up to ~C++14 are Scott Meyers books, Effective C++ and Effective Modern C++, but I'm not sure if they work well alone when you've not used C++ in a long time. And don't have a good recommendation for something covering the stuff newer than that.
I mean, there are at least two different companies (Enthought and Continuum) that were founded on making the major scientific python packages easier to install.
>this is in all likelihood true for every political party everywhere

Of course it is. And of course consistency is not the point. Hypocrisy is just good politics. "It's bad when you do but good when we do it" is optimal strategy.

Check out Schmitt for the "friend/enemy distinction" in politics [0]. All political factions plays this game, this is fundamental to democracy [1]. Holding your opponents to standards and principles you yourself don't follow is how you win. And of course speech rules within social media platforms is fundamentally a political issue.

[0] https://youtu.be/0d3aRYlSHDU "The friend-enemy distinction"

[1] https://youtu.be/HqgLlYO4JSo "Carl Schmitt On the Contradiction Between Parliamentarism and Democracy"
C++ needs a new frontend. Something close to C# / Kotlin
It usually means below-average snowfall in Colorado. Other states might fare better than us.
It does use RocksDB which is c++. But the result would probably be less stable if that had to be Rust as well.
I downvoted because the first paragraph is dead wrong and needs correcting.

Carbon accounting for fossil fuels absolutely includes extraction, refinement, and transportation costs. Saying that it doesn't undermines everything else you say, because this is easily checked.
The language in the law says that email providers cannot do something "impeding the transmission of email messages based on content." So, they can probably give you tools to allow/deny emails from addresses you can enter, at least. Given that spam filters blocking fundraising emails from conservative groups is already something discussed among conservatives, it seems at least plausible that making spam filters illegal was actually intended here. I guess we'll find out as soon as someone sues (or the supreme court throws it out).
At some point it's going to be too hard and too negative to be an online 'speech' company. If anything big enough to have to deal with this were to disappear (bankrupt, pivot to other business, shrink to a smaller niche, or just disband), that would be nice and quiet for everyone. At least there is no law requiring a business to continue to exist just so a screaming cesspool that depends on it can also exist.
I feel that with very little effort I could get on one of those shows. Recently I have been holding off the entropy a little- even throwing a few things away, but hey, someday I might be able to use those 1970 transistors from the old equipment in the back room.....
USE FogShop
DELETE
FROM tblCreditCard
WHERE ixCreditCard IN (
SELECT ixCreditCard
FROM tblSubscriber
WHERE fStudentAndStartup = 1
)

ok you won’t be charged now
Why does it need both the keywords "auto" and "int" when declaring main()? Just seems extra confusing..
> it's a matter of creating a sound plan that offers coverage to everyone using what we already spend on Healthcare

"It's a matter of creating a sound plan" is not the trivial thing you make it out to be without having a broad mandate about healthcare. You sound like the typical person who has never run for political office, but somehow thinks that they would totally fix the system if they were in charge.

Governments are an efficient market of sorts. Affecting the market needs either broad changes in society's point of view, or catastrophic events. It's indicative of the magnitude of conservative thought in American society that even the worst pandemic in US history did not result in a bipartisan push towards socialized healthcare.

For what it's worth – I agree with you about healthcare being a human right, but I'm not the person you need to convince. It's the people in your nearest conservative-leaning district who tend to treat healthcare more like going to the car dealership.
It will create echo chambers of similar views.
As I recall, when I made a metafilter account many years ago (2007!?!?) it costs 5 dollars to join. Which is a low enough amount that people can do it casually, but it's enough to deter people making random sockpuppets for the purposes of baiting and trolling and spamming. Introducing a barrier like that is an interesting and I think very valid method to maintaining the quality of an online discussion forum.
Or Vim and Python users. They type ":" a lot.
You would just end up with a massively underwater position.
Does Starbucks let random people come in and shout about some things, but not other things? Do they let anyone write on their blackboard at all? No. These are not things you can do in a Starbucks, because there are rules and they apply to everyone the same regardless of the content of their message or the thought they are wanting to express: sometimes you don't get to talk to other people in the way you want, and that's fine.

However, if I come to a Starbucks and I start having a conversation about something in a quiet voice similar to what is allowed of any other person at Starbucks--maybe because I am on a date with another guy--I certainly do not believe that the people who run the Starbucks should decide they will refuse to serve me or allow me to talk about our date with each other because they disagree with us being homosexual.

You are correct that the right to freedom of speech is not the same thing as a right to be heard by the people you want to talk at, regardless of whether they want to hear you or not... but that isn't what is in question here: people are being entirely banned from platforms such that even their explicit followers can't access their content, and messages with certain forms of content that are merely being sent between small groups of people are being "moderated" out of existence.
Right it means that every dollar counts in our political decision making
I can only imagine what it's like to be a journalist in higher education these days.
>Hard for immigrants to get those jobs. They might not in the locations where those jobs are, or can't pass a background check, or might have been arrested for dui 10 years ago, or maybe once wrote a hot check (which must happen way more for poor people).

Are you sure you're not talking about gig workers as well? For instance, uber says[1] that they need a valid drivers license and conducts background checks (which apparent check for previous driving infractions as well as criminal history).

[1] https://www.uber.com/us/en/drive/requirements/
How do you make cement and steel?
Wouldn't it be better to stop acquiring possessions rather than generating an endless stream of garbage?
Of course it is absurd.

The most logical, green and efficient solution is to burn Russian natural gas. But when you have politicians irrationally ignoring the needs of the people they are supposed to represent, this is what will necessarily happen!

"The five stages of grief: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, buying Russian gas in rubles."
Technical Feasibility – By Tim Reynolds – Biodigital Jazz
That is interesting. It makes me wonder if this difference is due to something innate, or due to the apparent leg up that attractive people have— teachers being more prone to spend time with them, etc.
I enjoyed Tim Reynolds's framing for how he leads as a Tech Lead for the team (focus on Time, Skills & Technology): "At the beginning of the project, I will direct my activities towards drafting a feasibility analysis report. This gives me a document where I can record answers to questions like the ones in the previous sections, and share the outcome of my research with the team and any stakeholders."
If I play Civ V and it crashes, I want my money back, just like I won't stand a broken appliance.

Thankfully App stores are already making this point clear to the industry.
Crackdowns and Censorship in the UK
It was to your comment.

Google blocks some spam messages before they reach your inbox and you can't disable this
Snapchat doesn't even have a Bay Area office. Also, since when is bracing for economic realities a sign that the entire organism is dying? It doesn't, this article is simply capitalizing on FUD.

As long as Sandhill road remains fully occupied by VCs, the gravy train will continue.
Can one also enable system bin for terminal (zsh)?
https://organicmaps.app/ Can search for „groceries“ around you and shows the opening hours of any shops (that have added the data to OpenStreetMap)
One of the deleted scenes from the movies shows Al Pacino’s character advising his henchman to ensure that the “dowry is large” at one his niece’s wedding. His niece and her boyfriend come to Pacino to seek his blessing on their marriage/relationship.

That scene instantly made me realize how much of the “culture” presented in the movie is accurately reflective of so many patriarchal cultures all over the world.

I mean, that is _literally_ how many Indian families treat power structures, marriage, relationships even to this day.

As a liberal, feminist, yadda yadda, of course I don’t subscribe to those beliefs. Nor do the conservatives in India or otherwise endorse the crime. But, peel back the thin layer of dramatized fiction and you’ll find that a lot of the movie is based on obviously authentic history/culture.

It’s simultaneously scary and fascinating.
Anecdotally the risktakers have mostly left for NYC or moved overseas. The region’s best days may be behind it.
These are things that National Geographic readers of a certain age were all very familiar with.
You mean things happening on the same frequency that they always happened?
Immediately chases you away with the truly ridiculous ask to change your browser width. Hard pass, believe it or not some people still use actual computers.
Not Australia, but a recent study[0] confirmed the Pakistan flooding (in which 10% of this country that's larger than Texas is underwater) links to climate change. Historically, tying events like this to climate change in a way that lives up to scientific rigor has been quite difficult, but techniques and available data have been improving. Allowing us to tie many extreme weather events to climate change, including: the seemingly never-ending droughts in the Horn of Africa, Mexico, and China, flash floods in West and Central Africa, Iran and the inland United States and searing heat waves in India, Japan, California, Britain and Europe. They refrained for making estimates for the Pakistan flooding, but earlier this year scientists found that the heat that scorched India and Pakistan this spring had been 30 times as likely to occur because of greenhouse emissions. July’s extreme heat in Britain had been at least 10 times as likely

If you're looking for a mechanism of action for how climate change can make monsoons more deadly, it's likely to do with increased evaporation of water due to increased temperatures and the fact that hotter air holds more moisture

[0] https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/15/climate/pakistan-floods-g...
> No one is forcing you to learn anything even if Rust is successful in the future

Agreed, which is why I explicitly stated that I don't feel like I'm being forced to learn it. You might be making the wrong assumption given the other person's blatantly deceitful replies.

Posts that are editorialized, shilling, ad/spam, or any of the other class of HN doesn't want you to do that type of posts, regardless of if it's about Rust should have the community call it out in comments.

To be clear, I don't hate the Rust language. It has a few features that I find appealing and there are posts about Rust that I feel worth worth the read. The cult like evangelizing and editorializing is what I dislike and makes some, including me, not want to engage with Rust's community.
Distributing uranium pellets for domestic heating might prove problematic, likewise trying to burn uranium pellets in existing coal power plants to facilitate the transition to other sources would be problematic.
> but if you think you can be speed up production and get the product done several orders of magnitude faster without ownership rules

If you genuinely believe that Rusts rules slow developers down by “several ordrers of magnitude” (which litterally means: “makes you 100 times slower or more”) then you've probably listened/read way to much anti-rust discourse for your own good…

Rust has a learning curve and in the beginning you're obviously going to be slowed down by the learning process, but for 99% of the tasks[1] once you've gone past the initial learning period, the rules aren't slowing you down since you've internalized them, and compiler errors end up being mostly about things that would have caused a memory bug in other low-level languages.

[1]: that is, everything but custom graph data structures, which are really hard to get right without a GC anyway.
If working for DoorDash is their best available option, I'm inclined to point the finger at every other company first. Why is it that DoorDash and the other Gig economy companies are offering the best available work option for so many? Where are the rest of the companies and the government? I've never really understood blaming the best available option for the lack of alternatives. There are also enough gig economy companies that if one of them was especially bad then workers could easily switch to the competitor.
simpler:

UPDATE tblSubscriber
SET ixCreditCard = -1
WHERE fStudentAndStartup = 1
There has also been a lot of censorship of tv shows (last week tonight got censored) and of signs held at football matches etc which have been removed from television broadcasts.
Perhaps they've read a summary of the decision that they trust?

Also, the decision is based on a single-paragraph long part of the constitution. I tentatively disagree with the decision*, consider this hypothetical: a one-thousand page long decision that ruled the government was allowed to censor all anti-war speech, based on the 1st Amendment.

It would be bizarre to expect only people that read through the whole thousand pages to comment on such an on-it's-face misguided decision.

*But I don't consider it entirely unreasonable, and I think the law behind it addresses a very real problem that we shouldn't ignore by sticking our heads in the sand and yelling "1st amendment".
I thought it was Bill of Materials
That you can find discussion with a focused search doesn't really address the opinion that "the people who usually talk about [privilege]" haven't "properly acknowledged" things like beauty privilege.

Certainly, sophisticated academics and other deep thinkers consider – or at least mention when being comprehensive – the many possible dimensions of privilege. They're not secrets, nor unstudied.

But the people most often flagging things like "white privilege" or "male privilege" often don't mention things like "height privilege" or "beauty privilege" or "personality privilege". They don't want the distraction.

Google result counts:

9,760,000 [white privilege]
1,590,000 [male privilege]
432,000 [beauty privilege]
3,130 [height privilege]

Some even get prickly if it's mentioned that those other privileges can have a larger influence on relevant measurable outcomes, like say income, than headline-grabbing race/gender privileges.
I was just thinking that I'd write a command for this if it didn't exist already. But it does: https://apple.stackexchange.com/a/50852
> Sure, but it’s still natural persons who are actually making those decisions, no?

It is a small handful of natural persons (or corporate board or executive team) deciding for the entire corporation full of people who have zero say that the fruits of their economic output (under the auspices of the corporation) are being used to support a particular political party or candidate.

If we look at individual political campaign contributions, then it's one person deciding that some of their hard-earned cash should go to support a particular candidate or cause. But with a corporate structure, it's five people deciding that the collectively-earned cash of thousands of people should go to support a particular candidate or cause.

To put it another way, an individual campaign contribution is "one person, one vote". A corporate contribution is "one person, many votes".

And no, most people do not have the realistic option to quit their job because they don't agree with the political contributions the executives have decided the company will make.

> Should government also have a right to restrict speech of individuals if they are rich and powerful enough?

Governments already do this: individuals are subject to political campaign contribution limits[0]. This unfortunately gets muddied by PACs and the like, which was the issue at hand in Citizens United.

[0] https://www.fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/candidate...
> This is unlikely to matter much for carbon (modern ocean shipping is ridiculousy efficient, assuming the goods have a long shelf life).

Strong doubt on this one. "Modern" ocean shipping is really bad when it comes to emissions.
Then it is unlikely that either your current or your next computer will be able to run M1-only software. What problem are you trying to solve?