skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Also, public transport is awful. Buses don't have air conditioning and the metro comes within 2km of the airport and turns away

That's an administration issue, not related to Niemeyer's design.
Movie soundtracks. I search for the best on Google/YouTube.

"Pretty in Pink, by the way, also has the best soundtrack of any movie I’ve ever seen, with many of the songs specifically written or re-recorded for the film. It is one of the most acclaimed musical compilations in modern cinema, and in 2013 was ranked #11 in Rolling Stone’s list of greatest soundtracks."

From:
https://moviewise.substack.com/p/a-love-letter-to-pretty-in-...
To be honest I was expecting to read an article about the popularity of Lisp, and how it compares to Rust.
That's funny, I'm in the US and my daughter puts on a British accent when she's playing.
I guess for either one it's something that sounds exotic and fun.
What is that supposed to prove?

Btw, Amazon has done stock buybacks. Which are economically equivalent to dividends, but get different tax treatment.
Any time this comes up I wonder: isn’t the ideal setup aimed at giving you a flat frequency response curve? Why reviews? Why experts and subjective opinions of online reviewers? Sure other factors can be a part of it like longevity of the product, price for performance, power, but at the end of the day sound quality can be objectively measured, no?
youtube music radios, I've long given up spotify for their shitty app and turns out youtube gives better recommendations for my music tastes
Just one question about that - what you are describing here - is that:

.) an unsolvable problem inherent to all peer reviews?

.) a problem that comes from specific practices, and could be solved by doing peer reviews differently?

I'm just a layman - but if reviews are not done by peers (= experts working in the same field)... who else could properly review a paper?
In hopes of regaining a more pure, attentive listening experience, I've steered clear of using the well-known streaming services. As such, despite obvious discovery limitations, erring towards contemporary music: Bandcamp Daily and Bandcamp's New and Notable sections. Also, I find music by way of a respective album's footer suggestions, e.g., recently, I was listening to Floating Points's Promises album[1] and the footer pointed me to Nala Sinephro's Space 1.8 album[2] - a rather neat find.

1. https://floatingpoints.bandcamp.com/album/promises
2. https://nalasinephro.bandcamp.com/album/space-18
It's a mind-blowing and efficient IDE. A pity it doesn't support android development though otherwise Intellij would be out of business by now!
Novell... Now that is a name I haven't heard in a long time
This assumes that market/demographic alone dictates the thumbnail. But context matters too.
To give a recent citation, from April of this year:

> The energy transition continues to gain steam, with oil demand projected to peak in this decade, perhaps as soon as 2025, according to new research by McKinsey & Company.

https://www.hydrocarbonengineering.com/the-environment/27042...
Typically I will use Spotify's radio feature to get recommendations.
I just remembered, I think I heard Brave Browser also blocks youtube ads. Will update my original comment.
You are ignoring the will of the people in a buffer state. In the EU they see prospering liberal democracies and on the other side it's permanent authoritarian kleptocracy, which by the way still sees them as part of a lost empire. Of course they are going to want a path to the EU.
This might have added to the already reported issues around licenses etc. As the new licensing model will be subscription based, having 100,000 VMs might come in at quite a larger price point as well as switching it from OPEX to CAPEX expenses?
Interesting how, in attempt to make the article on this topic more SFW, they decided to replace thumbs of actual porn with hand-painted representations..
My first kid had a real problem with wanting Robux, it’s all he cared about, I dreaded even hearing the name Roblox and never played with him. 10,000 arguments later and he was over it. He introduced our younger kid and stressed to him that “Robux are a scam” on the first day, and it’s now one of my favorite games to play with him and he started on Roblox Studio a few weeks ago. The older one doesn’t play much anymore but he’ll join us occasionally. it’s sad I missed out on all the fun with him because of the obsession with Robux and my inability to distract him from it. I think if I had just played with him, he might have not have cared so much, but my hate for it from all the fights stopped me from even installing it.
I listen to DJ sets on Soundcloud, then I'll try to Shazam any tracks I like (50% chance in my type of music, underground electronic) or ask in the comments for "ID Please?". Then I usually add it to my YouTube playlist [0] (Premium, of course), which gives recommendations, and I try to buy the record on Discogs if available on vinyl, which also has a recommendation engine.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLS9h1UWf2LH5VIR-lqJoM...
That's the entire point though.

For economic growth to continue, the economy must completely decouple from all necessary resources.

At that point all real commodities are not part of the economy which is growing so the thing with the commodities in it is the real economy which is static.

The inevitability of the conclusion is ironclad. The only matter is which limiting resources necessitate moving to a steady state economy.
I read music magazines for album reviews, and most feature a “new artist” section.
Presumably it goes like this:

1. Apply for loan under Bob Smith's name using stolen/forged identity

2. Company providing loan will only send to a bank account in Bob Smith's name

3. Provide the company with Bob Smith's real bank account details

4. Message Bob Smith, "oops, we accidentally sent you $x in error! please send it back"

5. Bob Smith now on the hook for proving they didn't apply for a loan
Don’t be indispensable at work – it’s a terrible trap
Nice, what bike?
Secure Your Node.js App with JSON Web Tokens
... most of the time =)

https://www.itnews.com.au/news/newman-still-considering-lega...
> it seems like the people who were meant to make money have since cashed out, that everything's peaked and turned a corner and the general public have turned against it

Every 4 years it looks like that. And yet the next greed fueled ascension comes around like a clock. Each next one smaller than the last one.

Next one will come around 2025 but this time it's going to be just few hundred percent.
I've used it a bunch and think it's really great. eg. https://camo.githubusercontent.com/ae63c1d0f7400487244599120...

I thought it looked good and it's very simple to use.
there's a book written in the 60s called the Effective Executive which I enjoyed reading.
> A communist back then would point to the capitalist countries committing horrible atrocities

Unlike now, where whenever we point to capitalism, we point to shining beacons of freedom and humanity. ;-)

> I doubt anyone condoned violent mass murder

The fact the Soviet Union and China didn't succeed at implementing an ideal utopian society doesn't prevent others from trying something slightly different (let's say, socdem) in hopes it'll suck less than unregulated capitalism
> , and lots of people even link to musl.
Yes, she can complain.
Some of those paintings sell for 5 figures each, hardly worthless
The author participates in bug bounties and Google have a $250k reward for certain vulnerability types so perhaps it’s more “sent me $250k without notifying me about my bounty submission” than “randomly”

https://bughunters.google.com/about/rules/6171833274204160/a...

Alternatively, they have his bank details from participation in bug bounties and he was mistakenly sent someone’s Ad revenue.

https://support.google.com/admanager/answer/2731686?hl=en
They didn't. I guess it's easier to apply for a loan for someone else if the money goes to their account (otherwise you'll have to fake a bank account, too. and with KYC rules and such it is probably not so easy). But I don't know how they could fake the sender, so this is probably something else?
A very naive thought, but isn't it a bit different for porn sites because of the existence of orgasms? If I'm watching TikTok and a really good video comes on I am encouraged to watch more but if there is a really good porn video I'm ... Done? At least for that session. So it's like they want to keep dopamine levels not cranked up, but at sustained medium levels.

Again, I don't know anything about UX, please tell me if I'm wrong.
> Because if you show that the converse of Goldbach's conjecture is not provable, you have actually proven Goldbach's conjecture (since you have shown that there is no counterexample!).

Lets hypothetize that Goldbach's conjecture is true and unprovable (let's call it S1). In that case, the following statments are both true:
C1) It is impossible to prove S1.
C2) It is impossible to prove the converse of S1. (since in this case S1 is true, the converse is actually false, so cannot be proven).

Now, if we go into meta-proofs, we may be able to prove C1 (whether or not S1 is true). But we will never be able to prove C2 (if S1 is true and unprovable, C2 will also be true and unprovable).

Now, if S1 is actually false, We may actually at some point find a proof of that. But that's not really so interesting.

The interesting part is that there DOES exist statements like this that ARE true AND unprovable (even if we don't know which statments), we just don't know WHAT statments those are.
> HN is uniquely interested in Lisp through PG

Not any more. I'm certain there's posters in here that do not even know who Paul Graham is, especially since he doesn't post regularly any more.

The legend of Lisp is being spread mostly by the older of us and the lucky few that got bit by the Emacs bug.

https://xkcd.com/297/
The main reasons against this are:

* Regulation. Plenty of countries are very specific about the exact mechanicals of brakes, in laws that are 100+ years old from when runaway cars killed people.

* Unsprung mass. Cars handle better if the wheels are very light and all heavy bits are in the body of the car.

* Large diameter motors are harder to design - there is no opportunity for a gearbox, so you lose one design parameter, and need the motor magnetics to be right around the rim of the wheel to make up for it.

* Difficulty of making the air gap within the motor very thin at such large diameters - you end up needing super large diameter roller bearings.

However, I think despite those downsides, the benefits outweigh them.
I would Betteridge the answer is no.
> within the ZFC formalism, then `CH ∨ ¬CH` is a true statement

It's also a provable statement (via excluded middle)
I think it's because nothing has any meaning anymore. Brands used to pride themselves on quality, but then they realized that the listener perceives quality based mostly on price and aesthetics. Even people who know better.

I remember about 30 years ago, my father was shopping for a stereo receiver. The salesman happily let him listen to them all, and he said, "You know, there's two people in this industry. There's the guys with the lab coats and measurement devices, who say that there's no difference in the line output quality between these amplifiers, and there's the guys who smoke a lot of weed and they say they can tell the difference." My dad, a CS professor, didn't really like that description of reality and still wanted to hear each one, of course. Past a certain level of amplifier fidelity, the speakers, their placement, and their wires are responsible for all of the sound quality.

My dad even used to tell a story about how an acoustics professor at his school used to take a car stereo speaker (cheap, think 1962) and he would put it into his own enclosure, and it would sound better than the expensive store-bought speaker. So he was well aware of this.

But, still, he listened to each receiver and considered its sound quality. But I bet he bought mainly on functional features and his perception of the brand.

Unfortunately, in these days, where the brand can be sold randomly, and old quality brands are recycled by formerly generic suppliers, our perception of the brand is way off. So many people choose based on price.

And, yes, they do think we are idiots. Remember when Sennheiser was selling identical headphones for two different prices, and the $300 ones actually had something added to make them sound worse than the $500 ones, which when removed gave you the same sound? Not only did this happen, but people who presumably were happy with their Sennheiser gear were on here defending the practice like any fanboy.
... or the brutal capitalist South-American dictatorships sponsored by the US so that South America could be saved from "brutal communist dictatorships" (or agrarian reform, or anything that could harm the profits of American companies).
Peter Thiel: The Tech Curse [video]
A lot of time it's from what my friends are talking/linking on social media. But I also use Bandcamp now and then as well as Wikipedia (seriously). The latter might not sound like a music discovery engine but if you look up a band/artist you like there are often references to their influences, bands members were in prior, and similar bands or bands in the same genre.
Yes! Saint clet, exactly.

I've researched, and you're right about Brittany, it was MI9 led.

But according to this: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_des_r%C3%A9seaux_et_mouv...

Most movements were on the left, and it seems that the saboteurs and maquisards were communists led. I'm pretty sure my grandmother told me about the Brest communists though, maybe it was just her impression.
Again, not a clown.

Wasn't an advice, just stating the known fact that people got rich overnight on various things, e.g. NFT.

Most of the US was "partnered" with Trump for four years and it flourished, the economy was booming, the US did not get involved into a single new war during that time.

Most businesses fail, all businesses fail to some degree, it's not an indicator of how "useless" somebody's mind is, even if they make one out of 100 that succeeds, it's a success.

You're likely in your late teens / early 20s, convinced that you've figured out how the world works and everything looks crystal clear to you. That is not confidence, rather lack of data points, life experience, research. You dismiss things and try to discredit people without really understanding the topic and resort to personal attacks, that makes you look unstable and childish, I can't really take seriously things you say, the arguments you make, there's not much that can be done here from my side, as you seem to have already made up your mind about things, driven by fear, anger, and other basic emotions, rather than logic and reason. This topic was about understanding central banking, and continuing this discussion would be a waste of my time as to understand something, one must be able to accept and analyze different points of view, instead of calling people names.
Via my children.
To preserve Earth's treasures, digital silence is golden
Not sure how much clearer I could have been about that I'm responding to the "pretty much the default" part
Outlaw looks nice. And great name. But pricey.
I find it very difficult to understand how "modern server monitoring" requires 6 or 7 components, when you can just deploy netdata on all your nodes with a 1-line installer and get way higher fidelity monitoring.
> quite capable of making it's own sound

But so isolated from the world around it that you can't hear it.
NPR Music and Pitchfork for mainstream stuff, Reddit and Facebook groups for metal and The Wire magazine for weirder things.

It's honestly amazing to read a review about an album of viola and cello free jazz and to be able to listen to it on Spotify and Bandcamp in 30 seconds.
Anecdotal, but I visited a second-hand SF bookstore in Stockholm a few months ago and I asked whether he had any CYOA books lying around. The store owner said that whenever he gets a new batch of books in, the CYOA books in that lot are all sold in less than a day.
Motorcycle physics are very interesting to say the least. My favorite is this:

What happens to the suspensions when you brake? Front one compresses while the back one extends. That one was easy. Now this:

What happens to the suspensions when you accelerate? Front one extends while the back one... also extends.

Motorcycles are specially designed to have this last behavior.
I use Wikipedia to check out all albums that are being released.

I listen to metal, so I'm frequently visiting this page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_in_heavy_metal_music
"Given you talked about "facilities" I would assume that you were talking about a professional environment, so assuming an adult seems fine to me."

Using "man" as general term to refer to a person of any sex is wrong, but assuming a colonialist Western cultural norm regarding child labor is ok?
No, plenty of places around the world where not every street is zoned, where there is space between industrial and residential zones for example.
I would blame the loaner for giving malicious loan that can't be legal. If someone here is not careful with money, it's the bank.
2 main reasons I can think of (tl;dr: cost):

1. Braking generates a LOT of energy which needs to be sent somewhere very quickly. Each wheel might need to dissipate hundreds of kW of power, simultaneously, on-demand, at any time in normal situations where mechanical brakes function fine today. This is not inexpensive.

2. Today, most EVs do not have 1 motor per wheel, which would be almost surely required to implement this type of system effectively. That's also not inexpensive and unless you can actually put the motor in the wheel-area you still need an axle to connect the motor to the wheel due to the suspension and steering movement, and then that axle would need to be able to sustain these braking forces.

It surely could be done from an engineering point of view today, it's just going to add tremendous cost over using conventional mechanical brakes regardless of if those brakes are a traditional hydraulic type or if they're a brake by wire system.
Everything everywhere is securities fraud.

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-06-26/everyt...
FeatureBase: Open-Source, Real-Time Database Built on Roaring Bitmaps
If?

There's Tether and USDC, plus a handful of others.

The critical thing at the moment is to be "sophisticated" enough to make the right choice.

In US law, an investor has to prove they have means (money to spare) to do risky things. They are "sophisticated" investors and can afford losses. (This word is used in the law)

The rest don't get to play. So the rest don't know the rules and don't understand contract law.

If you read a contract it defines the rules. Most people don't want to or don't know to do this and, right now, the government isn't stopping them from making these decisions about investment in crypto.

Many people talk about crypto without acknowledging the fundamental nature of investments, because the don't invest (i.e. not "sophisticated"). They want something like their bank. Somebody to make sure they don't mess up and take care of them if things go sour.

If that person is you, leave your opinions aside and keep your money in bonds and mutual funds
I understand exactly why fans hated it and the mediocrity of the corporate choices the Mouse made. What I'm saying is that there were elements (such as the green milk scenes) that made it appear like the director was speaking to us like an old man coming to terms with his childhood dreams and understanding the futility of escapism. I found it remarkable to find this in a mass-market, focus-group devised children's movie.
So bank fell for a con and now Bob has to pay?
It's where he keeps Nie Wieners.
"There's more common UX guidelines..."

I can recommend the table guidelines from this 2018 conference talk. The advice has not dated and the presenter shows before-and-after examples of making tables easier to read.

The section on tables starts at the 11.47 minute mark in the talk:

Web Typography (2018) | Set tables to be read: https://youtu.be/hbIZX6tE9JY?t=707
There are A LOT of words on that page and you have to read all of it to piece together even an elevator pitch. This makes me feel there’s a lack of focus.

So this thing allows easier integration of UI-driven external services into a web app (auth, payment, ecomm).
Please try to give the people you talk to the benefit of the doubt, and read carefully what you are responding to.

My training is as an applied physicist. We physicists have an interesting relationship with math. Obviously math is essential to the work that we do, but the physical world decides whether the math is right, not the other way around. Our mathematical models technically permit things like negative mass, time flowing backwards, or magnetic monopoles. But that doesn't mean tachyons, time machines, or fundamental magnetic particles exist--they don't, so far as we know. So I'm trained to actively disregard non-physical, not relevant mathematical implications. I'm sorry if this offends a pure mathematicians sensibilities, but pragmatically it is very useful.

Or take a different field: in computational semantics, a branch of formal linguistics, there are many models for inferring a formal logical statement from an example written sentence or spoken utterance, and then determining the validity (truth) of the statement. These models get caught up on stuff like "This sentence is false." What's the truth value for that sentence? If it is true then it must be false, and if it is false then it must be true. Error, validity of this statement can't be determined! But hey, it turns out that in practice this basically never happens unless the speaker is really confused, misspeaks, or deliberately evasive. Real sentences don't have this self-referential, circular logic structure because that's not how people think or communicate.

Now "this sentence is false" goes back to the greeks, IIRC, and Gödel's theorem is slightly different. Gödel's main work is in the formalization of proofs and proof systems, and I don't want to take away from that in any way. But the incompleteness theorem always seems to be explained through these sorts of self-referential examples and I have yet to ever see it reduced to a practical problem with real-world implications. Hence my question. Does Gödel's incompleteness theorem actually constrain a real world application of proof systems, where we tend to be interested in non-cyclical logical arguments?
I don't think Google is particularly evil in the grand scheme of things. If that's the bar then there are very few companies that I can buy goods and services from.
Updates to Emoji: New Characters, New Animation, New Color Customization
Bullshit. The whole and only point of Premium is that it has no ads. If they add them for paid users too they'll lose pretty much all of them.
US presidential narcissism linked to longer wars
I mean, you are more than welcome to share a subjective opinion. "In-depth" in this context means actual relevant content and not a few lines of text. Yeah, sure, one-liners are great and I myself have to Google them all the time because I forget the different variables that shorthand's can take, but W3Schools is on another level when it comes to this.

They inherited their authority from a time when content on the web was sparse and thin as a rail. The argument here is not that they don't provide _any_ useful information, the argument is that the inherited authority is making them first results for queries were they obviously should not be first.
Probably, but you still want to maximize the amount of time users are on the site, or the amount of pages they visit. Orgasms are just an additional complication, I'd imagine.
A man needs a name