skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/broad#Etymology_2

I'm not surprised that you didn't know right away --- and I agree with "sometimes dated" in the definition there, since it's been a long time since I've heard that usage.
> Buy Tinder Platinum

Maybe not if you're unattractive.
Maybe I should be able to guess but mind providing your employer, curious who makes reactors and space craft?
If your threat model is a modern phone running out of battery, I suggest an external battery pack. Portable, powerful, and allows you not to carry a slow chip and pin.
thanks for your advice
I suppose it depends on how you define wealth, but I can't think of many people who became really fabulously wealthy without creating value for other people, except when government was involved in a monopolistic or rent-seeking way.

It's trivial to steal somebody's lunch money. It's much harder to become a multi-billionaire without making something that a lot of other people wanted to spend money on. (If those other people were forced to spend money on it by the power of the government, it's a different matter.)
I haven't learned from any photographers.

https://people.com/music/pharell-williams-robin-thicke-blurr...
Sorry he meant “say something that’s aligned with a different political tribe”
They're building and A/B testing the new features that blocks you from using the site when you're not logged in, and force you to hand over your phone number if you want to create or use an account.
Ha, that'd be sad.
The Commoditization of Social Interaction and Other Progress
They are paying 350k for a ceo, who is a manager of a manager of an ops manager.

Which is way way below industry average.
Interesting but not surprising that "without Electron" is becoming a selling point of differentiation.
This exposes a major vulnerability in our military tech that can be (has been ?) exploited by our adversaries - likely the ones actually building the chips!
Yes -- We have to remember that Googlers are people and do what people tend to do :)
Enterpreneurs of Hacker News, take note.
This is all big name and massively influential stuff though. I think op is asking how to find stuff before it is a household name.
Why were they offset side-to-side about half a car width? Was this on purpose, or just poor aiming?
You mean the prosecution, and in theory you're right. Yet in practice many jury members believe their job is to find their best guess of the truth, not hold the state to their burden. So if you can't present evidence in your own defense you can still loose. Plus, the process is sufficient punishment. Before you're acquitted you may lose your job and have to spend large amounts of money.
I fitted the lap belts to my 'vert, which was already very much not-stock when I bought it, so I didn't feel bad making even more modifications (hydraulic clutch, modern T5Z trans, electronic ignition). There isn't a good, above-the-shoulder mounting point for the shoulder belt, unless you weld in a cage or mount one to an aftermarket seat.

The coupe is a close to correct C-code, which I've driven under 1000 miles in the last decade, so I've decided to leave it with period-correct 1965 belts that a prior owner installed rather than modify the B-pillar as my exposure isn't very high on that car due to very low annual miles.
As a longtime Patagonia consumer, I’m happy to hear the founder doing this. One difficult but positive thing Patagonia could do would be to make fleece that sheds much less. I have fleece sweaters of theirs that are a few decades old and they are substantially lighter than when they were new. All those tiny little fibers dropped on trails, city sidewalks or flushed into waterways via the laundry drain and they won’t break down for many decades.
why not just have larger photodiode to increase dynamic range? can't see how using more photodiode would equal more dynamic range or better noise levels? never seen a sony,canon etc get less noisy and better dynamic range as they add more mega pixels..
They’re asserting copyright over their work.

The part they’re concerned about is where somebody uses their work as a reference for derivative works.

We can acknowledge that this is an unsettled legal question without pretending like there’s no such question for a creator to raise. This community works better when we give each other fair understanding.
Most common type of collision IIRC
currently being the key word there. can you guarantee you will feel this way for the life of your data? if suddenly you become concerned with those collecting the data what do you do with the historical profile they’ve built for you?
I've wondered if this is supposed to convince you their algorithm is very accurate. Look, it perfectly predicts the training data!
> Python is call by reference. Change my mind.

No need to change your entire mind; just an incorrect definition of call-by-reference.

Passing a value which has reference semantics isn't call-by-reference.

Your f receives x by value. That value is a reference into a boxed object. The x[0] = 1 does not change x; it changes the boxed object.

>>> def f(x):
... x[0] = 1
...
>>> a = [ 0, 2, 3 ]
>>> b = a
>>> f(a)
>>> a is b
True

The f function can do nothing to make "a is b" false.

Under pass-by-reference, assigning to x would do that.

Under pass-by-reference, we can pass a reference to a, such that a can be replaced, without affecting b.

"pass-by {whatever}" refers to the semantics of the parameter and what it receives from the argument expression, and how, not the semantics of the argument object/value.
What’s a multi-billion dollar company who’s only created a web page?
The big push from the top to make chips in the US makes a lot more sense now.
I mean, I have actually used a data lake and it worked pretty well for its intended purpose. Fuck having to email 5 different people (and have a 50 minute meeting) and wait 3 days (or 3 weeks) for them all to send me fucked up CSVs and Zip files full of XML and whatever the hell else, with no clear provenance and absolutely no documentation.
Let's say I have dependencies A, B, C, D, and E.

I absolutely love A, B, C; they're critical to my project, the maintainers put pour their own time and effort in, and I want to make sure they get my support. Dep D is pretty good and I wouldn't mind throwing a bit their way too. E is some wrapper lib (or maybe a company-backed package) that I don't care to support monetarily.

Since I want to support 60-80% of my deps, something like StackAid sounds attractive; I don't have to set up and maintain individual (potentially recurring) donations to each. I set up $100/mo to be distributed, feel good about doing my part, and go back to work.

Turns out, only E is collecting their StackAid, for whatever reason. My $100/mo is all going to them. Nothing is going to any of the others, let alone the packages I definitely wanted to support in the first place. I think I've donated, so I don't think to seek projects' alternative donation channels to get the money into their pockets, so they don't see a dime.

The only solution is to go through all of my dependencies to see which ones are actively using StackAid and decide if it's a sufficient set before donating through them.
The concern I'd have with structures like this is capture of the trust/management that result in most of the company resources going towards enriching the employees and management, rather than whatever end goal was originally conceived for the profit.

It's not uncommon for these kinds of structures (with no central holder or pure profit motive to maintain accountability) to simply pay out the vast majority of profits in excessive pay for management and the like. It ends up being a company for the benefit of the few who happen to control it.

Hopefully I'm wrong, and they can continue to achieve there goals for the long term anyway :)
Pest is a rigorously hardened P2P protocol with fit-in-head simplicity
Dream on. Intel fought its $1B fine for directly screwing AMD for 13 years. Money on lawyers and bribes best spend, penalty cancelled.

https://www.theregister.com/2022/01/27/intel_eu_antitrust_fi...
The nice thing about the title is you can see how many commentors don't even attempt to read the article.
Maybe there's "real info" there, a few quotes without context, but this reads like nypost decided to make an edition for silicon valley.
This is potentially a serious federal crime but it wouldn't meet the legal definition of treason. Treason is a very specific crime; it's not just anything that harms national security or defrauds the government.
Target?

Not exactly a grocery story, but it wasn't a single skimmer either.
I noticed extreme DNR as far back as the iPhone5. There isn’t really anything they can do about it, the camera sensor is tiny
get a mirrorless... DSLR are old, can't even compare these 48mp images to say a Sony at 48mp well i guess if your not that into printing large and only viewing your images on facebook i guess its fine.
> whereas furnaces have to take over entirely for dual fuel systems

Why is that? I see no reason you can't run both, other than a more complex thermostat setup - probably something with an outdoor reset, that kicks in when outside temperatures are too low.
Yeah even in my lay experience, this stuff sounds exactly like the stuff that I can expect to get fake components for on eBay/Amazon

> Suppliers Atmel, Analog Devices and Siliconix provided the potentially counterfeit transistors, memory chips and accelerometer chip
It is, but I've wondered about whether there are even better materials?

Let's say you have a battery immersed in a tank of water (aside from the contacts), and you wanted to match the amount of water to the stored energy of the cell, such that, in the event that the stored energy is accidentally released, the last of the water boils away when the battery is empty.

Apparently it takes about 2.37 kwh to boil a gallon of water. That's a lot of energy, but if you have a car with an 80kwh battery pack, you'd need about 33 gallons of water, which is probably too heavy to be a realistic option.

(Granted this is oversimplistic because the energy that comes from a burning battery might be more than the electrical energy you could get out of it just by discharging it the normal way.)

I found a wikipedia article that lists joules per gram required to vaporize various substances:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enthalpy_of_vaporization

Water is way up there. Iron and aluminum are even higher, but it's hard to imagine even an EV fire being enough to vaporize large amounts of those. I don't think I'd want to be breathing that either, though given the "battery fire" scenario I guess that's already a given.
I've seen impersonation bots that add random noise to the profile picture of the user they're impersonating, so it's possible that Twitter is already doing something like that (just with a similarity threshold too low).
I'm impressed, never looked at another photo, just emerged from a blank room taking pictures having never seen another photo before. Just knew photography from the womb and came out with camera in hand knowing exactly how to work it. You are the one man who never had to learn a thing or rely on someone else or their prior works for training and/or inspiration.
It also distributes stress between the "safety cage" around the passengers and the structures on the side of the car. Modern cars respond pretty well to a perfect head-on collision but things get messy with an offset crash.
Such that the drivers crash into each other, and not into the empty passenger seat of the other car.
OK, you said, "...which is good for real world performance bad for scoring that perfect five stars in a low speed lab test that actually helps sell cars." This strongly implies that you believe the lab tests are not valid for their purported purpose of making cars safe, but are rather more of a marketing gimmick.

You also said that designers should, "Revise bumper and front/rear cosmetic design to allow for effective bumpers (see also: the 1980s) and tune crumple zones to need higher forces to deform them so you don't have to potentially replace a whole car over a 10-15mph collision." This strongly implies that the bumpers as they are currently designed are crumpling needlessly at low speeds, and that they could be made to not do so, like the bumpers of the 1980s, without compromising safety, hence that the engineers designing them are not competent. Although admittedly in retrospect it could also be that the engineers are designing to the aforementioned tests. Regardless it's an extraordinary claim, requiring evidence.

Your first paragraph also makes a number of claims, many of which I'm sure are true. Certainly curtain air bags and seat belt pre-tensioners have been shown to save lives. I recall reading a study on the positive impacts of adding pre-tensioners to the back-seats of vehicles a while back. But again I don't see anything supporting the claim that crumple zones are ineffective, or specifically, that, "The speed window at which they will appreciably reduce the deceleration in the cabin is well below the speeds at which a seat-belted occupant of an airbag equipped vehicle has to worry about serious injury." That could be true, but it's not supported here.
if you want image quality you will not find it in phones... this is a limitation of psychics
Q&A with my high school self
good read, but given its C++ I'd put the unlock in the destructor otherwise I don't think it's exception-safe.
I'm not calling the author an expert on sugar babies. I was providing an example to show that it is illogical to dismiss everything a person says, even if they have said something outrageous in the past.

Absurd: wildly unreasonable, illogical, or inappropriate.

It's not detrimental to discussion to point out an absurd statement. I'm not saying absurd in order to be rude, but pointing out that it's a logical error. It's not a poor starting place if my goal is to inform others that the addressed statement is in fact absurd. Since that is exactly what I was attempting to do I'd call it a very reasonable starting place.
My thought as well. Might be time to trade my shit in.
The data is their business model so I don’t see how it’s a double standard
Fossil fuel based clothing is one of the primary sources of microplastics in the environment, which harms our health, and the health of the environment. This is true whether or not the fossil fuel based clothing is from recycled materials. Unfortunately, 60% of human clothing is now fossil fuel based. This is a growth area for the fossil fuel industry; actively participating in it only perpetuates the cycle of harm caused by these materials.
That’s what the tone is for.

I have OP’s problem too. When there’s an icon it’s easy, but some terminals (older ones?) don’t have the icon anywhere but support the functionality so you just have to sort of try to figure out where it is.

It can also be a problem on small terminals. The bigger ones have plenty of room, but sometimes the small ones put it awkwardly on the back where you would never look for it.
Setting them all to the same is probably not unreasonable.

You could also do something like set the PIN for a given card to the security code backwards or to the last two digits of the account number concatenated with the first two digits of the security code.

Either of those should be fine under the threat models applicable to most HN readers.
Unifont is missing tons of glyphs. I dont think any singlular font covers all the characters.
?? umm SpaceX was going bankrupt ... this is a fact... without the contract that NASA gave them there would be no SpaceX, are you a Musk fanboy i am not sure why your saying.
Both, because the promotion system is intricately intertwined with the Graveyard lifecycle. An engineer can rise more easily to the next rank by starting a project and delegating it once the promotion is achieved, leaving it to die. Due to the time difference between action and evaluation, there are no consequences for the initiator.
Blacklist Lockheed, Collins, and Teledyne? What are we going to take to war, Cessnas with water balloons on board?
Maybe you only go to stores that happen to use a specific brand of reader? About a third of the machines I tap on place the sensor somewhere different from the icon, and the staff just continually tell people to tap some other hidden location like a specific corner or the bottom middle of the screen. (Colorodo and California)
Venus, a new “standard library” for Perl 5
Yeah that was my initial thinking as well. My only concern was discoverability, meaning if we put a huge "Businesses here >" it might be a bit annoying to normal users, but I guess we could design it in a better way.
I suppose if you're making more than your electricity spend, it's financially worthwhile to mine (you can always sell the card later too if the price calculus changes to not favour you later)

Though it remains to be seen if the Eth Classic price will hold up with a lot of new, constant, sell pressure from miners. If the influx of miners greatly outnumbers other users, the price will likely go into a dive, until miners no longer can mine ETH classic profitably.

Then, it's likely many (the ones who don't care to speculate on future price appreciation) will either try to find a different chain to mine for, sell their cards, or store them for a point where the tide price/hashrate shifts to make mining worthwhile again
You may think that, but get an Apple Watch or other smart watch that can do it. 10x better than the phone was. Don’t need to get anything out of your pocket or even carry the phone in the first place.
Like Yoyodyne?
#1 sounds great. I hate how I can't open a link from iMessage directly in Firefox Focus, which is my normal practice. In the process of copying the link, I have to long press, which causes Messages to pre-load a preview of the page in a standard webview. I don't know what this does for privacy, but I wish there was a way to disable just this behavior.
I've been playing with DSLRs for twenty years. I just fuck around until I have some rudimentary understanding of it. Just like how I approach anything else, including playing instruments.
Can confirm.

Source: am a Shopify engineer
Yeah, this is fair, it was a continuation of the ETH chain, just a lineage that the vast majority of people consider non-canonical.

I meant it in the sense that ETH Classic (the "brand" if you will) was created at that point
That's why I used the word "obsolescent" rather than "obsolete".
Related question: is there a website that tracks and rates major websites based on pages size, number of requests, accessibility, etc. (Is there an easy way to count CPU cycles used by a page?)

Maybe pages will improve if we ‘name and shame’ the worst culprits.
> Also, any section of the network that's at full throughput all the time, and just evenly divides that throughput amongst users as it gets more load is not going to consume /any/ more power per GB no matter how many requests you throw at it.

If it's at full throughput, you can't throw more load at it (well, smaller packets is more load than larger packets for the same throughput).
You should take some detailed photos soon just in case.
Let's please just agree to ignore each other from now on. We'll both have a better life this way. Cheers.
It didn't make sense already? I don't know if you need this as a separate justification—the global chip shortage and Chinese saber-rattling over Taiwan should be justification enough.
i can definitely think of a few things that can come from purchase history that could end careers, relationships or families:

1) Having homophobic parents and buying anything supporting a “non-traditional lifestyle” (like books from a particular vendor)

2) Having liberal parents and buying say a firearm

3) An unfaithful spouse supporting another relationship (remember Ashley Madison?)

4) Being a well known promoter of a particular brand when buying from another for personal use
This sounds like what it was like to work at a Fortine 500 company that’s in a declining business and hadn’t had profits in a while. I know that’s not the position Google is in but if the work environment is like that and the interview process is ridiculous then stock options has to be the only alluring thing.

Huge companies like that make it really hard to feel like anything you do matters.
What happens when everyone installs antivirus? Is the virus market just going to collapse?

What happens when every e-mail provider has good spam filtering? Is the spam market going to collapse?

Etc.
If only. Big companies won't be blocked, small ones change names and nominal CEO/owners and carry on like nothing happened.
Amazingly enough nobody made choices about how public they wanted their work to be that anticipated "someone scraping the entire internet and putting it into a giant neural network". This whole AI training thing may technically fall under fair use but it is right on the edge and begging for this very hazy edge to be made a lot sharper.
Yeah, I'm having second thoughts about my 91 sedan with no airbag...
Flameless Ration Heater
Electrolytics have a limited lifespan, that's not due to poor quality like the PCs with caps blowing out. Almost any old electronics will need caps replaced if they haven't already been.
"Microsoft Defender SmartScreen prevented an unrecognized app from starting. Running this app might put your PC at risk."
At least you'll go out in style. Seriously though, it would be great see the older car styles brought back with modern safety standards or older cars in some way upgraded to modern safety standards.
The article suggests using the contactless sensor, but how is that not another potential "skimmer" device?
https://archive.ph/8QcCQ
To be fair, some of us (me included) are about to be parents for the first time. I'll take all the good pointers I can get, obvious or not.
At 48MP these things are starting to tread on the territory of the "super resolution" mode of my Olympus camera body. Of course, the top-of-the-lone iPhone is also larger than that camera body in 2 out of 4 relevant dimensions, and costs more. The new iPhones are so big and so expensive that the idea that I would rather carry one than a big expensive camera is starting to seem questionable. In fact, if I had a choice, I am quite sure I'd rather my camera with a cheap lens were stolen, rather than my iPhone.
For those who want to understand the full details of this mishap, former Air Force F-16 pilot C. W. Lemoine did a detailed analysis of the public report.

https://youtu.be/z363_Yjup0U
Poor mans mind mapping tool with just the terminal
I bet the Malibu driver would have a sore neck for a while.

Wonder how whiplash cases have trended over time. Wouldn't be surprised if they've gone up -- more survivable crashes, haha.
I found that a SNOO was very effective in the first 6 months. It is expensive, but it was way better than being even more sleep deprived. It plays white noise and rocks the baby if it senses them stirring. https://www.happiestbaby.com/
>> Chouinard’s wealth was his ownership of Patagonia, which was valued >$1B. Not a liquid billion in a bank

In other words, this specific billionaire's money was invested the same way as most of the other billionaires on the list that he was really, really pissed off about being included on.
Too subjective. Objectively climate has always been changing and will always be changing. Earth has seen much warmer climate and much colder climate and everything in between since formation. Your definition of issues don’t really make sense unless it’s subjective because objectively climate change is just is, not good not bad, just fact and consequence of complicated system. Even in the past many centuries, if you look at history, plenty of empires fell because of climate change(floods, droughts, etc). We are accelerating the change but it would still be changing even if we didn’t exist.
Sometimes X for Y just literally means X for Y, like "Milk for lactose intolerant people". I think this is such a case.