skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I assume that turning the taps back on would be seen as a short-term thing in order to fill storages and avoid short-term economic/humanitarian domestic issues. There's surely no country left left in the EU that considers Russia to be a tolerable long-term trading partner, except maybe for Hungary.
Scala isn't fun anymore
Sed and awk kind of sound like high-level troll names.
Other variables come into play as well. A mild and windy (lots of wind power) would help keep energy cost lower. From what I have seen, currently energy cost are expected to triple however worst case scenario could be 10-15 times increase. The effects on society and economic would be enormous.
The drive is fueled by more than a century of hard science. Imagine being convinced by countless, well proven and reproducible facts, that e. g. our CO2 emissions create a greenhouse effect but seeing little effort to mitigate that. Of course the voices get more loud and panicked. Especially when you see clear patterns of drastic, fatal and irreversible changes like permafrost melting or species after species vanishing.

I don't understand how people can put up blinders and pretend there is no actual and horrific danger.
Excellent critic, thanks!
Is it like the Dropbox redesign from back in the day where one can pretty much can expect they will roll back some of the new design changes to make it less different from what the front page was in the past?
Question: The author of the 9P server module "created an executor that can run async code in a kernel workqueue"; is this made a lot easier by the fact that Rust doesn't include an async executor as part of the core/stdlib?
> Cannibis can be in your system for weeks or months

No.

You are confusing the tests for cannabis metabolites (that can tell if you smoked weeks ago) to tests for THC, the substance that gets you stoned and leaves the bloodstream as you sober up.

A driving impairment test will test for THC, not metabolites. Nobody cares if you smoked last week, only if you are under the influence when driving.

In the UK, having 2ug / litre of THC in the blood is a drug-driving offence. At a minimum you will loose your licence for 1 year.

https://www.majlaw.co.uk/offences/drug-driving/cannabis/
Your last 3 comments are you plugging your own startup. At least try to make it look like you want to contribute to a discussion.
When I wrote the code that published that for Storengy UK around 4 years ago I never expected AGSI would get featured on HN. Strange world we live in.
The weather across the globe will get more chaotic. All across the globe we will start seeing weird weather, including both unusually cold seasons and unusually hot and wetter and drier years. This might seem counter intuitive but if you imagine a pot very slowly heating up, you'd get different regions of cold and hot until the pot reaches equalibrium.
Yeah I'm not sure either but that's the usual comparison point.
I don't even use Serverless Framework that often yet get irrationality annoyed at how generic a name it has.
+1 haha, indeed.
I always wonder about this, I wonder how many lines of code from the 70s are running in my iPhone.
And yet again it's crypto miners abusing public resources and leading to stricter rules for everyone :(
If my granny had wheels she would be a bike.
What is descriptive about "RHEL" or "AWS"?
I have a suspicion that generative art is going to hit a data wall, also. All of these models are constrained in what patterns they can learn because image captions are not very precise. They can rehash common motifs associated with keywords, but they’re not good at following specific instructions. (“The chair is at the corner of the rug, turned 15 degrees to the left, with the leg nearest the camera aligned with the edge of the fireplace.”) For them to meaningfully improve in this regard, I have to imagine someone will need to locate a trove of a few billion images with exceptionally high quality captions, and well distributed throughout the space of possible image types, subjects, themes, and styles.
So many epic scenes in that movie.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BySdtZWDCwI
On top of that cats are actually not local to most places in the world. So they are an introduced predator which the local wildlife didn't develop defenses for.

I also wonder if you would accept the same argument if the neighbors dog would maul your cat (or even your child)
Cryptic names will only have one outcome. The 'ingroup' whom understand the network of names will run the show and anyone who asks what AlphaBetaCharlie actually does, is at an eternal disadvantage.

Judging descriptive names by their worst examples is not exactly a charitable interpretation.
For me personally, there's a few reasons:

1. It's a kind of code golf - or rather, it's about seeing how much one can squeeze out of a highly limited and fixed platform. Writing this, I think of things like Mahoney's Cubase64 ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTGkf21UpJ8 ), which uses a combination of skilled coding and creative (mis)use of hardware functionality to perform real-time effects on sampled audio data on the Commodore 64. As the demonstration itself states: "You need 32-bit, 2000MHz, 1GB at least; what if... 8-bit, 1MHz, 64KB is enough?".

2. Creating a game which can stand its own to the platform's contemporaries on an 8-bit ecosystem can be reasonably achieved by a bedroom coder in their spare time. To do so for modern consoles or machines, one typically needs a higher budget and multiple people.

For this point alone, though, there are arguably easier ways to accomplish this. PICO-8, the herald of the "fantasy computer" phenomenon, created a system inspired by 8-bit limitations in graphics and sound, but offering a modified Lua interpreter in place of coding assembly by hand, in an attempt to balance the stack more towards creativity and away from complexity. (And, of course, nobody is stopping anyone from simply making a retro-styled game with modern tools. Many indie games do exacly that. There's two separate "notable" Game Boy jams on Itch.io - one enforces games actually targetting the real platform, the other cares more about matching the look/feel.)

3. The ability to reason about every component of the system down to bare metal is a welcome retreat from writing complex, object-oriented code running on top of stacks on top of libraries on top of runtimes...

In the end, it's a novelty which tickles a particular part of my brain, I suppose. So long as I enjoy it...
Will there be a particular region where the higher average warming is concentrated? Or will all regions tend to be, on average, warmer (ignoring the higher variation)?
New study finds: The climate getting warmer may be fuelling online hate speech
It's possible to disagree with something and yet tolerate it, especially when you've got bigger problems like affording food and warmth this winter. While they may not have your respect, I suspect those who tolerate the monarch have plenty of self-respect.
No system of government or society is pure, adhering to an unblemished ideal system. No communist government has been purely communist, no democratic system is perfectly democratic, no meritocratic system excludes all possible factors contrary to meritocracy. I don’t believe anyone has ever said our system is perfectly and ideally meritocratic in every way. That’s not what any reasonable person would take the statement “our system is meritocratic” as meaning.

It’s mostly meritocratic. Compared to many other systems, along with other comparable liberal democracies I’d argue it’s one of the most meritocratic systems developed so far. It’s also one of the most free, and the fact is free human beings don’t always make every decision based on merit. I think it’s clear if we chose to get rid of the monarchy we could do so through democratic mechanisms. So far we have chosen not to do so.
This not actually substantively different from throwing an exception.
> As in, orders of magnitudes below the next higher causes, which are mostly wild cats and pesticides

I'm not sure if you're aware, wild cats are a direct result of domestic cats.
Still, there's some rate at which these things ignite, the main choice seems to be lots of small fires vs few large ones. Firefightability matters for sure but I'd guess is second order?

What's the total expected number of LiPo fires per GW of base load, assuming intermittent renewables and grid storage?
Well which is it? Politics, or the Royal Family? If they're separate please ask a more specific question. If they're not separate, shouldn't they be?

As for your specific points, are you being facetious? They seem deliberately outrageous, but... oh dear...

The UK military routinely recruits minors: https://www.refworld.org/docid/498805c2c.html

The Opium Wars: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Opium_War

Prince beat dogs (sorry, couldn't find anything about kicking them): https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/british-press-sco...
"Contempt" is much more accessible and enjoyable.
It might not be great with USSD, you'd be stuck to one country.
Thanks, you're most welcome. Same to tomcam (below). :-)
Ah! that's a really good question. No whitespace before the colon in type annotations is my own personal pet peeve – the hill I'd die on – so it seems like my duty to answer.

I think of it this way: there are two symbols that by coincidence are written the same way (two dots aligned vertically). I mean that genuinely (I think of them as separate things), but it also helps as an explanative device.

The first I'll call the prefatory colon. Its usage matches usage in English [1], where the text preceding the colon introduces the text after the colon. For example, it is used to start a block (as in Python), or to create a key-value pair (as in Python), or define a member of a struct with a name-value pair (as in C or Rust).

The second is the type annotation. This syntax is borrowed from mathematics (notably, type theory). It is a binary relation, and binary relations are always written with equal space on the left and right. Just as you'd never write `x= 1` (another relation), `x> y` (relation), or `x+ z` (operator), you'd never write `x: X`.

Whenever I see "a: b", I immediately think prefatory colon. Despite having seen it hundreds or thousands of times in other people's code, it always trips me up when it turns out to be a type annotation, which has to be deduced from context or the right-hand side.

Truthfully, I'm somewhat baffled how it would ever even cross anyone's mind when designing a language to write type annotations like `x: X` given the long-established, pre-existing precedent in mathematics and the way its semantics seem backwards (if you had to use a prefatory colon, `X: x` would make much more sense to me).

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colon_(punctuation)#Usage_in_E...
always ask what can i learn from my fellow entrepreneurs

even if it’s just what not to do

no one’s path is easy even if it appears so
Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Amazon Web Services?
There was hydrofoil service in Hawaii in the 1970s. Here's a British Pathe video - https://www.britishpathe.com/video/VLVA1SE53IIQRQ0OX28UCAGCB... .

https://www.civilbeat.org/2018/01/more-on-why-the-hawaii-sup... says "This fast-ferry operation closed in 1979 due to the rough interisland sea conditions and related high maintenance costs. The three vessels were sold to Far East Hydrofoil to operate in the Hong Kong-Macao service on the inland waters of the Pearl River estuary."
The Execution of All Things
Part of the discussion on the drag sails was that while they are decreasing the time in orbit, they are increasing the collision area and therefore the general risk of collision remains the same.

Tethers are somewhat better but hard to work with. Propulsion is the best bet at the moment.

One consequence of this ruling could also be in the orbit insertion strategy. Currently agencies are not too worried about your satellite being in working condition in orbit as long as you demonstrate the risk of collision is low enough through natural means. Now that we are likely required to use active deorbiting system (and possibly active collision avoidance), the rules may be more tightened regarding testing and analysis.
I was responding to claim that bot uploads of autogenerated work is not a problem, as humans can generate work at the same rate.
Ask HN: How Safe Are Password Managers on Compromised Devices
I‘ve been thinking about password managers a lot lately. More specifically about what malware could do (and not do) on a compromised machine using a password managers (e.g., 1Password).
I’m no operating systems expert and would love to know how far an program with or without root access could go reading the password managers data. This might differ on different host OS (Linux vs macOS vs Windows).

Let us assume a standard master-key plus master-password setup. We also assume a hosted data service by the provider (i.e, they encryptedly store everything, except master-key and master-password).

Obviously a malware could access the clipboard and thus get each password copied to the clipboard. But how far does it go? Can we access password in-memory when the vault is unlocked? etc.

Can malware access the master-key? Can malware access the master-password? How? Only via keyloggers? Can malware access all passwords when vault is unlocked? Can malware access anything in RAM? What could malware do when sniffing network connections?

Thanks for indulging me! Would be great to get some understanding from experts in OS or password managers.
> `async` to make fake generators.

Genawaiter[0] is one of them.

[0]: https://github.com/whatisaphone/genawaiter
Who benefits from this? I do not believe it is anything other than deliberate.

For decades the US money has been substandard compared to what other developed countries use.

By comparison US dollars are like cheapskate Monopoly money, given the colours of the notes are the same.

Cheques and hand written signatures for credit card purchases have survived far too long in the US, the French had PIN in shops in the 1980's with nobody complaining about the lack of bounced cheques with forged signatures.

Please fill me on the cultural differences I am missing. Why does the US have a currency that seems practically designed for forgery and smuggling?
Sequestering carbon using current methods requires too much energy. In order for CCS to work out we need a surplus of green energy, and we have a deficit.

Geo-engineering could be done by changing the planet’s albedo, for example by seeding the upper atmosphere with certain chemicals, but on the one hand we don’t understand the earth’s climate system well enough to do this safely, and on the other hand it’s like having a foot on the gas and a foot on the brake at the same time, intuitively you can tell this isn’t a good solution.
Last time I checked the UK didn’t have to face widespread homophobic attacks conducted by groups advocating discrimination and violence, widespread gender-based violence, ineffective investigation of violence against journalists, impunity of police and issues relating to bringing torturers to justice. Because that was the reality in Ukraine before the war.
because of the first amendment and stuff.

also I didn't say don't ban. I said don't shadowban. that's worse than banning.
Just a gif? Where's the presentation? I'm spoiled by the awesome notcurses one[1].

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcjkezf1ARY
You can also use .get(idx), which gives you either Some(data) or None in case of out-of-bounds access.
QuickBooks

I'm assuming this is a tool for quickly laying out and publishing books. Or perhaps a tool for quickly searching for and downloading books to my iPad or ebook reader.
An indicator of the dangers of C.
IMO the best part of Tailwind (and much like yourself I wasn't sold initially) is working with a bigger team or passing projects around. There's no picking through classes figuring out what's going on; we can literally pass any page to a developer, and assuming they're familiar with Tailwind, they know what's going in the CSS.
Paste | Senior Frontend Engineer (React) | Copenhagen | Remote | Contract

Paste is an award-winning productivity app for Mac and iOS devices that saves millions of minutes for thousands of users every day.

We are currently rebuilding our website https://pasteapp.io from scratch to get it up to date with the latest product features, give it a fresh new look, add smooth interactive animations and a couple of new pages.

Our goal is to create a pixel-perfect, high-performing and easy-to-maintain statically generated website that looks great on both desktop and mobile devices. We expect this project to last about 2-3 months.

Learn more and apply: https://pasteapp.notion.site/The-Paste-Website-6462543a6db64...
I don’t have any references handy, but I suppose it’s a combination of the U.S. being a top destination for investment (because of the currency, risk-level, innovation and productivity), plus high demand for labor.
I abbreviated on the phone, but the respective full names are “X Enterprise Linux” and “X Web Services” which are literal description of what their thing is. “RedHat” and “Amazon” are generic, but the product names are highly specific.

I mean it could’ve been “RedHat Cthulu” and “Amazon RainBox”.
It's not virtue signaling to want to run as fast as possible from the supply of a known aggressor that won't stop trying to invade its neighbors. Germany got itself into this mess it was warned for decades not to. It's going to hurt to decouple, that's a fact.
To make it even better it would be useful to have the stored amount per capita and also number of days the country can rely on stored amount. Although I understand the usage will heavily depend on the weather and how far the country will go in restricting the usage of gas reserves (for example, shutting down various production sectors).
Eh, as the sibling comment says, it's about the ROI of the new word. If you're defining something with it that would otherwise take many words to explain, or if you want to introduce a new idea, or otherwise use it as shorthand, great. If you're using a new word only once, then why even use it?
Why? OK, sure, Shakespeare is better when it's been rewritten into modern hip hop rhymes and reinterpreted through lyrical dance but what's the advantage of rewriting something that's working and workable in some other form just because that form is not old?
I would think that having a battery based train engine, that can use electricity where available and use batteries where tract electrification is not done is better than fuel based ones, no matter the source or type of fuel.
Are css variables intended to be used like that?

"--radius-2": unprefixed, in global scope/namespace? I'd rather use scss variables and modules tbh.
oh yes that Almodóvar movie was really weird. I remember feeling a bit nauseous in the end.
From what I understand a rust panic will just call BUG(). There is no support for unwinding as such.

Most likely you would have to use .get() which returns an Option rather than [] array index which panics.
I larelt agree. I wrote a while back about how to make good names[1]

Choosing whimsical names is a pretty good way to satisfy my two most important requirements. They are often unique and don't mislead people.

Of course my ideal name would also give some hint about what it does (I think Google's BigTable may be one of the best named products) but I think this is far less important than the other two requirements.

[1] https://kevincox.ca/2021/03/23/good-names/
I don't fully understand how this is supposed to be an alternative to Tailwind while not providing utility classes out of the box? Did I miss something in the docs?

To me the biggest benefit of Tailwind, apart from the great base design system, is not needing to come up with class names for 99% of the things in the app. This is of course only possible when you have some way to abstract components out of the reused parts of your markup – e.g. you're using React.

Edit: The title was "Open Props: Tailwind Alternative from Chrome Dev Team" when I posted this comment.
Except science says look at the stress levels of such prison-like conditions. Lab animals usually have insufficient physical activity and insufficient "play" to keep the animals at sufficiently natural cortisol levels for that animal, and a lot of the science being generated from these animals is marred by lack of care when handling the animals.

The vast majority of papers, no matter if they support a position I hold or not, are simply garbage. It is a continued waste of public and private resources to not consider maintaining the natural state of the animals and expect the science resulting from it to have any meaningful impact.
China says NSA used cybersecurity tools in attacks against Chinese university
I’m still not sure if I have one. I prefer to read texts with voice (not mine usually, I simulate some recent narrator), probably because my memory works much better with speech.

When I think about routine, the voice is either too dim or it’s just shadows of words mixed with images and concepts. E.g. going to gym or a clinic doesn’t involve “I must take a shower, grab my belongings, plan a route, …”. It is a sequence of snapshots or highlights, which helps to quickly check if all goes well. Me in a shower, me looking at a bag, me riding a taxi, etc. Words only play as directives like “need to take ids/contract with me”, which I explicitly emphasize to remember better.

But when I think about my job (programming), words are the least effective instrument. I use them, but they are mostly syntactically equivalent to a program, it’s hard to say that it’s a coherent speech, instruction or description of some sort. As with routine, words help to anchor key points and write down todos. But there is no clear monologue in my head like “I install a new package and an import it in that source file, then I will use a function from it to convert my data into X”.

If you have an internal monologue, maybe we can share ~verbatim examples to compare?
A nice journey back to starting programming for me. On my PCW Amstrad computer, I wanted something a bit faster than the Mallard BASIC and Logo that came with it. I tried some Pascal compiler that only compiled to slow interpreted P-code. FTL Modula 2 was much faster and had quite a nice programming environment. I also did some Z80 assembly programming, but that was time consuming for a full program. Later I ported my Modula 2 code a MSDOS compiler when I moved to a 386SX PC.
The ipcc reports cover solar-radiation-modification/management and geoengineering generally along with mitigation and adaptation.

Currently they say if we don't move to renewables, carbon fees etc. faster then we'll need to do some of this. But it would be cheaper to avoid it as much as we can:

https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/chapter-4/

Their summary on solar-radiation-modification is:

> Uncertainties surrounding solar radiation modification (SRM) measures constrain their potential deployment. These uncertainties include: technological immaturity; limited physical understanding about their effectiveness to limit global warming; and a weak capacity to govern, legitimize, and scale such measures. Some recent model-based analysis suggests SRM would be effective but that it is too early to evaluate its feasibility. Even in the uncertain case that the most adverse side-effects of SRM can be avoided, public resistance, ethical concerns and potential impacts on sustainable development could render SRM economically, socially and institutionally undesirable (low agreement, medium evidence)
In that domain (accounting), the name refers to “doing the books” which probably predates the abacus.
As a current parent, I can not envision a situation where it is not possible to put down a child in order to open a rubbish bin with two hands.

I mean there are lots of other situations that occur regularly which require you to put a child you're carrying somewhere else. I mean how do you think parents of more than one child manage?