skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I personally do live in the way described, and it's fantastic. Why does a person need a ton of private space? There's plenty of space outside, and life's more rewarding out there too. A space to sleep, shit, shower, shave and cook is everything a person needs. And the ability to go wherever is best for you with minimal difficulty is wonderful. My life got immeasurably better the day I started living like this, and I did it with low 4 figure capital investment. Imagine reducing housing costs by 2 orders of magnitude. Most people dont need what they think they need. The only thing I wish I had is ownership over the land I'm parked on, which is coming soon enough.
If you had shit to do, Clippy was the digital equivalent of some annoying pest of a person throwing out random numbers when you're trying to count cash.

If that's not enough, he specifically creeped women out according to that article:

Generally, Atteberry’s character tested well in focus groups—the best of any assistant in some cases. Yet its massive eyes could be buggy. Some women in the cohorts deemed Clippy a man, and the constant male gaze creepy. “There were comments about how Clippy was leering,” says Roz Ho, who worked in product planning for the PowerPoint team then. When Ho raised that concern, she says the men in the room—everyone else, basically—couldn’t process it. “It really wasn’t about, like, these guys were bad guys, or anything. It was just they had a hard time picturing that feedback.”
Relational databases are perfect for data analysis scenarios, especially when it fits in a single server. Why are you pumping data over the network, and serializing/deserializing it from a table structure usually back into a table structure, when you could just process it , often using only the data in the datastore, and pipe the final computed results over?

Hell they even have a name for databases specialized for this usecase — OLAP

The problem is that databases, and SQL, are such a pain to extend and define sufficiently general operations that you don’t just have scipy in the database, and thus your complicated analytics have to be fully specified with the few rudimentary analytic functions that are actually provided to you.
It's good to know that boomers are out there in the comments handing out mediocre advice, just like they did with jobs.

"59 year old white male, 30 years of marriage with kids commenting...
Get out there, and meet people. Some people stink, some are great!!"

Oh, right, that was the problem.
China would just step in
I always thought that RAM extending software was just a joke. wow this was real
> Can you explain to me how purchasing housing with the intention of renting it out at 0.5% per month makes sense without either relying on high amounts of leverage or hoping it appreciates in value?

I do not disagree, the crux of real estate as an investment relies on being able to invest on margin without the lender being able to call back the loan, and of course, 1031 exchanges serving as a tax deferment vehicle.

If not for those two benefits, people would be better off buying VOO on margin.
Check out https://diataxis.fr/

I think this "documentation framework" has helped me a lot to write precise docs and how to structure everything regardless of the platform
A dot is required at the end. http://ai.
> Before the existence of our universe, there was no time

We don't know that.

> Time was created along with the space, matter, and energy when the thing "sprang into existence."

These are just speculations. Some theories indeed mention that, but they are not part of our standard models.

For now, we just don't know.

> it's difficult for most people to grasp.

Oh come on…
Serious counter-counter-point for anybody interested: HTTPS protects people from ISP-based MITM attacks. This by itself is more than enough reason to always use HTTPS if your website can be accessed by other people, even if it is just a small little innocent static blob of HTML.
There absolutely are such vandal groups. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31939177
That is because it is literally the same car as the Impreza, only lifted and with some body cladding.
multi level parking, 2-3 story housing built over existing mall, build high rise housing in unnecessary parking areas, put some grass/parks in. not sure why this is complicated.

starts with rezoning
yes. I wanted to avoid doing what another thread pointed out was needless argumentative oppositional voice on HN. Maybe I should have said "I agree"

fundamentally, I think this is a false dichotomy. I don't think the author proposed a strawman to knock down, but I do think its an instance of a faulty model: the implicit either/or in "two kinds of.." don't apply.
Turns out HN doesn't consider the final dot to be a part of the URL.
Ideally cities and townships would build physically-segregated dedicated bike paths and related infrastructure. This would keep cyclists safer and motorists faster.
And me, sadly.
“On an infinite timeline, everything should occur, forever.”

I can imagine scenarios where that isn’t true- maybe the universe cycles through a long loop of states and just repeats that infinitely for example.
Not exactly: most of these frameworks essentially JIT compile the entire operation graph so that it can be executed, and the Python code only touches the data at the endpoints of the full computation. I don't know why the JIT compiler doesn't optimize a = b + a to a += b, but I guess they assumed that the JIT-ed code path would only be used once, so the compiler has to be fast.
Time, as component of the universe, itself "sprang into existence?"

Despite "sprang" being a fantastical word to use in this context, it at least carries with it one thing for sure: a temporal component. "Springing" on its own indicates some sort of motion, which can only take place in time. Furthermore, "sprang" indicates a past tense, so that this "springing" took place at some (primordial) moment in time. According to your account, time presupposes itself.

You're applying the terms of experience to non-experience. The error is in a sophism of figure of speech.

Unfortunately you haven't explained anything at all. All you've demonstrated is that Kant was justified in writing the Antinomy.
To add irony, part of the added weight of cars is the ton of safety equipment that legislators mandate more and more of every year.

Maybe the last stage will be airbags on the OUTSIDE of the car.
So?
as was pointed out in another post they take a wide range of cases.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32805520
Can it be built from source? (Am thinking if yes, then the seed feature should be easy to add).
You still use the uuid storage type, so all existing indexes that work should be fine.

This is about the generation portion.
1) Conservatism isn't a political party as such, 2) conservatives in particular seem to be very big on emphasizing their strong principles and adherence thereto... as long as it doesn't inconvenience them or expose them to icky things like new ideas or social progress.
This requires macOS 12.5 but it doesn't seem like it's released? At least for my region?

System preferences "Software updates" tab says I'm on the latest (12.4) and there are no updates for me to install.

How am I supposed to try this?
Good reasoning. But take it one step further…who pays when shipping costs go up?
> What countries have those laws, and how have they worked out?

Here in Norway the driver is assumed to be at fault, mainly due to the following paragraph:

§ 3. Basic rules for traffic.

Everyone must travel with consideration and be alert and careful so that no danger can arise or damage be caused and so that other traffic is not unnecessarily obstructed or disturbed.

In case there's a major accident, the driver at presumed fault will have their license temporarily revoked right away. However if the investigation showed the driver drove with reasonable care and caution, the driver will usually be exonerated (and thus get their license back).

There's been a few notable cases regarding this, for example one case where a pedestrian crossed the road at night during winter in a poorly lit area, got hit by a a car and died. The driver was found not guilty as the pedestrian had not worn a retroreflectors or similar, thus the driver had no chance to see the pedestrian until it was too late.

However, due to the above, the driver will often get some blame. There's been cases where the driver does not get an involuntary manslaughter charge, but does get punished due to paragraph 3 above. A recent one I recall is this one[2].

[1]: https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/1965-06-18-4/KAPITTEL_2#%...

[2]: https://www.nrk.no/osloogviken/broytesjafor-frikjent-for-uak...
> It's not valid to extrapolate backward to a time before our universe existed.

And yet, you've managed to do just that!

> This is a concept that I've tried to explain to others for years, but it's difficult for most people to grasp.

Not surprising since not all people experience the same reality.
Whenever I see things like this in highly visible code that people exclaim about across the internet it makes me really take a moment to absorb how much time I spend agonizing over minutae in my daily work and how people who really are just lucky can get away with much worse. Just a reminder about how the idea that "tech" is a meritocracy was never really true.
People having trouble with this on a Linux-based OS might check out the systemd-resolved discussion in the current thread about the ai domain.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32804743
Right but you assume the person would be stupid enough to plant their feet and get slowly dragged under the train. Reaction time drops sharply as MPH increases.
This is bad faith nonsense. You can do better. Be better.
Framing it as "support" is extremely disingenuous.

You can defend someone's right to say something offensive without actually being in support or agreement with said statement.
Yeah, I feel like learning the conventions is 90% of the battle especially with Rust. Otherwise you're playing a puzzle trying to figure out which combination of traits and objects will solve all the constraints.
There's whole _fields_ of inquiry that either take or leave the axiom of choice; so yes, absolutely.
The Galleri Test: A New Blood Test for Cancer Screening
Yes, that's obvious.
Since we’re already splitting hairs here and there, I can’t help but point out that a double-blind study would likely be a wrong kind of study for this purpose (gods could use it to find out if virgin sacrifices are a must, or non-virgins could be just as good), and you probably meant to say, “randomized controlled trial”.
Thanks, I'm gonna try this one at some point.
Unfortunately, no, haven't had time to try it yet, bookmarked it few days ago. Just wanted to comment that there are others and probably will be many more coming shortly.

I'm used to troubleshoot all kinds of stuff but I'm not a Python guy and wrangling with dependencies and virtual environments is not fun in my book. I've got lstein repo working but can't wait to have cleaner way of doing things.
This is great good job. I found the score being cut off vertically on my mobile device and also found the “guess duration” to get impossibly fast after a certain point
That's the answer I was hoping for. Thanks!
I don't think this is an operator overloading thing? It's just that `x = y + x` is equivalent to

z = y + x
x = z

Basically, creating an object `z` just to throw it away.

`x += y` just adds y to x directly without any intermediary.

You could write this in any language pretty easily. For example, in Rust:

let x = "abc".to_string();
let y = "123".to_string();
let x = x + &y;

as opposed to the more efficient:

let mut x = "abc".to_string();
let y = "123".to_string();
x.push_str(&y);

It's just using an operation to mutate in place vs an immutable operation.
The difference is that in the case of UB in C the compiler will say "aha! I will just assume this can never happen", where as with platform-dependent behavior, the compiler can never make such assumption, so has to be conservative about its assumptions.
Happiness is silly and blithe. Better to have a deep well to draw from and good health.
> this nation has changed dramatically in the last few decades...the elites have clamped down on the little people in so many ways

Wait until you learn about slavery.

> but the amazing thing was that the other characters did not think the relationship was unusual at all...nowadays, in a movie or in the media, such a relationship would be portrayed as scandalous...

Wow, it’s almost like standards for what’s acceptable evolve.
This is exactly like if you were to ask: what can exascale do for larger scale quantum simulation.

Not much! These devices are vanity projects and prey upon people's intellectual blindness in the face of giant numbers.
Where does vehicle mass come into play when cars have ABS and thus it's always the brake pads stopping the car, not the tires?
I think Python package management is pretty good now. The absolute toughest bit is learning how to work with virtual environments, but once you have a string understanding of that I think the system works very well.
Just about any car can brake hard enough to lock up all 4 tires and enter a skid (or activate ABS to avoid this)- the limiting factor to braking distance is friction between the tires and the ground.

Scaling for static friction between rubber and asphalt does not follow the friction equation you are taught in high school physics class. Generally, for a given weight of vehicle, a larger tire surface area is able to produce more maximum braking friction. In other terms, minimizing the surface pressure and maximizing the surface area at the contact patch increases maximum braking friction.
Yes. It's definitely not a blue/red team issue. More generally, I think the problem is low information humans. Humans who react with emotions first reflexively and then selectively scrape available data to build up some sandcastle to support their actions.

With Brexit, there was some vague notion of exploitation by the EU and by immigrants, and of lost sovereignty, and with Twitter mobs, it's of some great unpunished injustice. With the former, it leads to people voting against their own interests, and with the latter, a rejection of law and order and a return to half hearted vigilante justice.
Michigan's unlimited PIP is lifetime (so no out of pocket maximum to cover in year 2 of your catastrophe). There's rules about what is covered of course, but the financial side of it is a bit simpler.

My premium for the year is less than 1 month of health insurance, it's pretty cheap.
I assume that you don't have thousands of people looking over your code, how can you know that it doesn't have similar or greater room for optimization?
How to extract bred tritium at parts-per-billion concentration from hundreds or thousands of tons of "blanket" material quickly enough to cycle back into the plasma has not been studied, and might not be possible.

Furthermore, nobody knows how to get enough tritium bred in it in the first place. You need for each neutron captured to breed more than one tritium nucleus, to make up for the fraction that fails to breed any. A fusion reactor with no fuel is a remarkably expensive doorstop.
i think the point isn't that somebody other than the government should have that power, but that the government should have less of that power.

it's perfectly reasonable for goverments to self-limit themselves - for example, pass a law that daylight savings time can't be changed with less than 6 months notice.
Is it really an inconvenience at all? Learn some patience.
For getting around the paywall...

https://archive.ph/jJLuz
Imagine making a sumptuous dinner and then sharing it with friends. There would be the eudaimonic happiness associated with preparing a great meal and then the hedonic pleasure of enjoying it with others. You get both types of happiness—but you get them at different times.

Different times? I don't really agree. Sharing an event of any kind has always been much more fun (and rewarding) for me; there's just no comparison.

In fact, from my experience, you can always have both "type of happiness," and I wouldn't have it any other way.
I was trying to return `Response` directly, which reading the above one would assume is the end-all be-all of `IntoResponse`. But `Response` is generic and you need to harmonize Body types across branches, etc...

Anyways implementing a custom `IntoResponse` shouldn't be necessary in the first 30m of using a framework (not saying I didn't just miss something, but I've read the docs multiple times).
[May 2022]
If python did not have operator overloading it would not be used for numeric programming to the extent it is. Overloading is key to its success in that field.

The problem is thinking `+' and `+=' are the same, they are not and `+' should not be used when `+=' can be used.
"13.7 billion years in the past, both density and temperature become infinite."

This seems like an article of faith. In mathematics, I guess. At any rate, I see a lack of anything resembling evidence that such a state is even possible. Let alone that everything we do observe is the inevitable result of it. Infinite "density and temperature"? We've not seen or measured anything like this. Nor will we, ever. Why have we 'bet the farm' on it?

The BB solved some problems when it was proposed, IIRC. Worth following up on. But if it's getting in the way of a better hypothesis, then I'd like to hear about that.
It seems difficult to say, one idea is you could proceed with this approach but then write tests for any failing conditions when they arise.
It seems inefficient to check every line of code works after writing it as well - especially for larger systems with complex state setup.

Probably somewhere in the middle is right but will be different for everyone/is variable
> For the purpose of this example, let's say that the expensive computation is register-intensive but doesn't write any memory (so we don't need to get into alias analysis issues). Because it is register-intensive, our optimizer would like to free up the register occupied by i, replacing the second use of i by another load from mystruct.i. In C or unsafe Rust, this would be a perfectly fine optimization.

WAT?

This is obviously not "fine".

This kind of bullshit is why I said Odin's stance on UB is what swayed me to prefer it.
This is amazing! Exactly what I was looking for when I was building my MVP, just a responsive, standard looking stylesheet I could plug-in.

All the supposedly JS-free CSS frameworks use JS for their most basic components.

I bought a template on one of those template sites but it needed like 20 JS scripts just to display the landing page.

I thought of trying the Zengarden stylesheets but they didn't cover the components I needed for a saas website, and they were also way too characterful.

I'm past the MVP stage but I would have paid for this if I had seen it 6 months ago, at least the price of a template: 20-50$.
On the one hand, I've often understood that it would be nice if we could assemble a list of "all the axioms" and prove it's consistent - at least that's how it was presented to me and roughly my interpretation of what eg. Russell and Whitehead were trying to do before being derailed by Godel proving it's impossible. On more recent reflection, it seems a little silly to want a proof in system X of the consistency of system X, even before we get to Godel, because if system X is inconsistent then it can definitely provide a proof that it is consistent by the principle of explosion.
Browse wikis and docs with nested tooltips
there was https://www.personal-media.co.jp/retail/utronkb/index.html
In PyTorch `x = y + x` is actually semantically different from `x += y`, so you can't easily make the switch with a compiler.

The difference is that `x += y` modifies `x` inplace, where `x = x + y` creates a new object. In other words, if anybody had a reference to `x` before the update, the "optimized" code would break things.
Somewhat off topic, I was curious to read the lyrics, and Google confidently pointed me to the lyrics to Presto instead. I was so confused until I realized those weren’t lyrics to Red Barchetta.

https://www.google.com/search?q=rush+red+barchetta
Automated Testing for League of Legends (2016)
What is your point? Please, tell me what conclusion you're driving at. Or are you just mentioning it?
That’s what he means by it’s coupled to the underlying data structure; you can’t simply define a general purpose utility function to accomplish this (without smashing strings), that could be applied to arbitrary tables — eg on an arbitrary schema, or even on unnamed tables (eg resultset of a select query)

Which doesn’t matter in many of these simple examples, but this is the thing that really stops you from getting to have your import gravity ecosystem of utilities that modern application programming enjoys. And the continuing buildup of libraries on top of libraries for further complexity.

Instead you’re limited to extensions/packages, which are coupled tightly to the RDBMS internals (which is why you don’t see much of SQL extensions shared across DBs, despite at the end of the day operating all on the same shared framework [relations]) and whatever functionality the database provider has deemed fit to provide (perhaps at cost)
This isn't a Python issue, this is a "I'm copying when I don't need to" issue. As I mention elsewhere, you can write this sort of "bug" in almost any language pretty easily (as I demonstrate with Rust).

This isn't a case of "The Python interpreter is bad" it's just that the code is doing what the user asked it to do - create a completely new copy of the data, then overwrite the old copy with it. Immutable operations like this are slow, mutating the value (what += does) is fast.

Granted, a compiled language could recognize that you're doing this, but it also might not - is `+` and `+=` semantically identical such that the compiler can replace one with the other? Maybe? Probably not, if I had to guess. The correct answer is to just use the faster operation, as it is with all language.

I don't know the type of `x`, but I'd suggest another optimization here would be to:

a) Preallocate the buffer rather before mutating it 3x (which is still likely forcing some allocations)

b) Reuse that buffer if it's so important, store it in `self` and clear it before use.
Plot twist: it breaks the code...?

> Changing this back to the original implementation fixed an error I was getting when doing textual inversion on Windows

https://github.com/lstein/stable-diffusion/commit/62863ac586...
Nuitka is a Python compiler fully compatible with most Python versions
Fun fact: Photoshop does exactly that if you open images of currency. See: https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/cds.html
Both of my M1 Macs only have 8G of RAM. Is it a waste of time trying to run this with 8G?
Yeah my girlfriend works construction and drives a Honda Civic. It fits all her tools just fine. On the job she drives a company truck. Still 75% of her coworkers drive their own personal trucks to work. It is more of a cultural thing.
On separate note, I recently started avoiding Firefox packaged from distro (just extract official download in ~/bin or sth ).I think everyone should do it, my rational goes like this

- distro are usually slow to ship new updates

- when u update running Firefox under its feet using distro package manager, it won't like ... everything crashes.

- not distro ff applies update patch when it starts or shows yellow notification on right side to say update is ready ... much better UX.

- most distro do not ship with LTO/PGO optimizations (I think have not checked)

- snap packages have uses, but I do not like sth Firefox as snap, unnecessary bloat.
For reference, here is the corresponding table of all 16 functions, from Knuth: https://imgur.com/a/Xb2HysB

(TAOCP Vol 4A, earlier draft of this part online at https://cs.stanford.edu/~knuth/fasc0b.ps.gz.)
LOL and then later on a professional driving a tractor-trailer unit who is able to hold the line perfectly. The skill gap is enormous.