skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There are lots of tandem like addons that work great for medium sized children - I remember using one extensively with my mother when I was around that age. People with cardiovascular issues could probably still ride a low speed ebike or electric scooter.
And function prefixes for external libraries so you know where they've come from.
Scientists are now utilizing AI to diagnose mental health disorders
I think it's fear of a power negative media reaction-- that the murder would lead to success for the political position that the murderer attempted to strike at.
considering good teacher is rarity it's pretty bad idea, without looping everyone can experience him at least for short time, with looping some may never met such teacher

in kindergarten I couldn't wait until my kid gets through a year to get better teacher next year, now in primary school we are first four years stuck with oldest teacher in school, we won a "lottery", at least I teach my kids not to take teachers very seriously because with these salaries nobody competent will keep teaching (and don't get me started 95% teachers in school are females, very healthy ratio to have diverse views presented), same goes for telling kids if they won't study good at worst they can always join police force where bottom of the barrel ends
Again, I said I don't know what's actually happening. I'm just providing my interpretation of what I thought the grandparent comment was trying to say.
Maybe? Technically we don’t know anything about a free software world without Linus in charge other than TMI about Stallman right?
This actually makes a lot of sense, especially when you consider that WASM is now a thing.
Knockoff meters are like $10 on Amazon. Not a bad investment.
Hardware wise, going back to the '90s, there was the Suga Genesis with a 68k padred with a z80. Since then every PC with a 3d accelerator.

Software wise: something Java? Now we have Spir-V, WASM, and UEFI adding bytecodes for ISA interop.
I didn't go through and click all the links in the article, I was mainly interested in the problem-solving section. However, that one links to a Harvard Business Review study that drops this quote:

> Received wisdom is that the more diverse the teams in terms of age, ethnicity, and gender, the more creative and productive they are likely to be. But having run the execution exercise around the world more than 100 times over the last 12 years, we have found no correlation between this type of diversity and performance.

They go on to say that when they say "diverse teams solve problems faster", they mean cognitive diversity:

> Cognitive diversity has been defined as differences in perspective or information processing styles. It is not predicted by factors such as gender, ethnicity, or age.

Intuitively this makes much more sense than the race-based stuff I've been hearing about. You want people who can look at a problem from a different angle from you. It's sort of like having a team of specialists (one guy is good at UI, one at performance, one at tooling, etc.) except on the level of cognitive processes and not specific skills.

I believe that maybe these studies arose saying "diverse teams are better" and people misunderstood it to mean "racial diversity" and ran with it (kind of like the Hungarian notation fiasco).
I consume nothing but sourdough, because of the simplicity of ingredients and no sugar is necessary in its recipe. Lately I've found that "take-and-bake" loaves can be purchased, frozen, and freshly baked on demand. It works out great, and I love the simple, honest flavor of San Francisco style sourdough for sandwiches or just a buttered slice to go with my supper.
By this definition it doesn't matter at all. I could support myself for a decade without work and yet by the credit-card based definition I'm apparently living paycheck to paycheck. Scary!
I keep a simple text editor open to accomplish that with. You keep line breaks that way.
It's funny how the mind is mathematical to mathematicians, a compartmentalized system to psychologists, an engineering system to neuroscientists, a small representation of God to religious people, an emotional system to artists, etc... like the parable of the blind men and the elephant.

I sometimes wonder if our minds can create the reality we wish to some extent so we all live in our own universes.
That's fine. Just understand that I consider you a law-abiding terrorist.
1Password announced support for Passkeys back in June, as did Google and Microsoft [1].

[1]: https://blog.1password.com/1password-is-joining-the-fido-all...
'Fake' in the sense of having been designed to be a sort of downtown-ish space, as compared to real downtown areas that evolved more organically. I've seen what your parent commenter is referring to; it looks a lot like like living at a mall.
Tactical nuclear weapons for example.

https://www.19fortyfive.com/2022/02/russia-has-a-massive-sto...
Hyperledger FireFly: A complete stack for enterprise Web3 applications
Intel Hyperscan is a high-performance multiple regex matching library
There is truth to the matter, but it's also because class conscious groups fail to recognize that they perpetuate the same racism, sexism, etc... that the elites do.

Coincidentally, ignoring race as an issue is the one issue many people on both sides of the political spectrum can get down with even though economic equality does not guarantee racial equality.
I was initially very much against the idea, but this comment kinda put me in a 'maybe not a bad idea' camp. Naturally, the stuff will soon be hacked to project all sorts of other things, but that is, for better or worse, standard human behavior.
1) I have a suspicion that girls are getting birth control pills at much earlier ages than they used to. Putting a girl on bith control pills in the middle of puberty is going to have an effect somewhere and weight gain is one of the documented effects of birth control.

2) Girls getting fatter likely triggers other changes as well. Given that the female body works very hard to shut down reproduction when fat is scarce, it may very well supercharge reproductive changes when fat is plentiful.

3) I think you heavily underestimate the number of girls who get breast implants. For a while, it seemed like every 16-year-old girl was getting them. You could notice a significant contrast when shifting between areas with different socioeconomics--blue-collar areas mysteriously had lots of girls with much smaller breasts than white-collar ones.
How do you explain the following data given your premise?

https://i.redd.it/9n4lf8f5hrc91.png

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_groups_in_the_U...
They claimed that data is encrypted on device and Apple never sees it.
Oh wow. You know U.S. labor is in a terrible place when AFT is described as a powerful union with an outsized influence on elections. (It’s exactly the opposite, actually, the only power teachers have left is the power to strike.)
This comment is just totally disconnected from reality. Sure, a minority of women are willing to date fat slobs. But all else being equal most women prefer a man who's in good shape, clean, and well groomed. Of course, that won't entirely compensate for being boring or having terrible social skills.
So my last response here, with all due respect, is:

>You want to frame mockery of and complaints about men as hate speech. It may be many things, but it's not hate speech.

The United Nations defines it as: "In common language, “hate speech” loosely refer to offensive discourse targeting a group or an individual based on inherent characteristics - such as race, religion or gender - and that may threaten social peace."

So...hate speech is offensive discourse targeting based on inherent characteristics, such as gender/sex.

Speech is violence, and this type of speech is violence against men, who are a class of people. And for sure the speech against men is offensive at the least.

If I were to say similar things to any group, except for men, I would be universally condemned.

Donald Trump was all about mockery and complaints and he has whipped up a whirlwind of scary stuff. It was all based on mockery and complaints. From that, he did bring it to the next level, but it started at the beginning as mockery - like when he mocked the man in a wheelchair, or mocked John McCain for being captured in Vietnam, and a hundred other examples.

>Pointing out the foibles, follies, and fuckups of men is not fostering violence.

That is your opinion. And furthermore, I compare that against why the same thing does not happen against women. Why not "woman-nagging" and "toxic femininity" and "women's-purse-and-other-junk-they-carry-spreading"? If the media and men started labeling women like this with diparaging terms, the world would screech to a halt and there would be weeks of articles and the entire media would have to go into a self-flagellating penance for years.

>This is has been a man's world, after all.

This has nothing to do with anything. You are changing the subject. If you want to argue that point, I will do that, but let's finish up with the point at hand first.

>Dressing up hostility itself as "just a joke" doesn't count, but I'm not seeing that in the modern culture you deplore.

Yes, the people who are the perpetrators often don't see things that the victims see.

Men are dropping out of society because of social disparagement of men. Men are dropping out. 60% of university graduates are women and I've read that is supposed to to to 70-75% in 15 years or so. Women have earned 10,000,000 more degrees than men.

Anyways, I just wanted to point out all these things. I'm sure you understand what I'm saying. No disrespect or being argumentative intended, it is just my viewpoint, and I'm going to stop here. If you don't agree, we'll just have to agree to disagree. And maybe some time in the future what I say might "click in" and you will gain some understanding for the other side.

Good luck you you and best wishes.
Hiring for social diversity (e.g race, ethnicity, gender, age) when the benefits of diversity come from cognitive diversity (micro vs macro pov, engineer working with computer scientist) is a very inefficient way of doing things. Yes it may be that someone of a different gender/race/ethnicity may have a different way of thinking, but it may also not be the case
> sous vide

That's the ticket. A properly cooked sous vide carrot tastes completely different from any other cooking method. All of the nutrients and flavor stays in the carrot. Add in herbs and spices and it will completely transform how you experience vegetables.
Why don't you try to rattle some of them off?
Ah, so it's not racist because it only discriminates against the non-majority portion of the proletariat. How very bougie of you. The fact that you don't see that as a problem tells me all I need to know.
I find this to be the crux of the issue. To be exempt from the rules that material things must follow, you simply need to designate it as space.

If space is what fills an area between object A and object B and that space grows or expands. This is no different than object A moving away from object B. What's the difference? There seems to be none.
> Even within that notion, he hasn't actually made a valid argument; by the logic he's using, you could evaluate a diversity program based on how many flat-earthers it admits.

This single sentence is a far better rebuttal of the post than your initial one which generated a lot of heat :)
I'm not sure if Cambodia et al would agree with the sentiment of "peaceful cooperation".
The sports-parent and coach lobby in high schools is often one of the stronger interest groups. I've known teachers to advocate for later starts in meetings (again: it really, really isn't due to some powerful cabal of ordinary teachers who just looooove starting school incredibly early) and be told sports are the reason it's not gonna happen (plus having to re-do bus schedules—admin hates working). Also, I can report that the old trope of high school athletes getting grades adjusted or being given way more leeway on disciplinary issues, which one might hope was now only observable on retro 80s movie nights, is still very much a real thing. Most teachers hate that crap, too, but administrators, coaches, and sports-parents all like the preferential treatment for athletes.
None? Talking to bare X11 is actually pretty simple.
maybe the bmi is also wrong. if your index is labelng half or more of ppl as diseased, maybe the index is broken. except for jockeys, meth addicts, and runners, most men are going to be aleast borerline overweight by 30. i dont know any thin people. maybe we need to make drugs legal..that will fix it. perhaps there is a good biological reason people weigh more, why fight nature.
Original source: https://pdrs4all.org/pdrs4all-first-images-release/

If some of the fine structure looks different between the two photos, your eyes may not be playing tricks with you: the Hubble photos were taken in 2004/2005 and nebulae can visibly change in that time: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KCCKl9SB90
Did you mix up desert (sand) and dessert (cake)?
Chromebooks can be considerably cheaper than a MBA.
Anecdotally I dated an artist for a short time who upon entering my home proceeded to ask me how much I paid for my art and why I would pay for something as awful as what I have.

My art was made by a friend of mine who works in a union factory in Texas. Art is his real joy and I was able to snag some pieces from when we were in college together. It's easy to write off that the pieces are just sentimental and therefore subject to sentimental value, but really, his work is very abstract and each piece (if you can snag them in order) describes a time in his life.

I tried to explain to this person how art to me is the story not told or the story as I see it. More recently I had the opportunity to really appreciate his work when I was on an LSD trip, but that's a story for another time.
500W 24/7 consumption? What do you do? Train ML non-stop?

Your example is in now representative of reality.
> Touchscreens were intended to reduce the level of distraction but have proven controversial...

Had to laugh at this. I've never heard of the concept that touch screens were intended to reduce distractions. If that was the intent, I think it has failed catastrophically.
> This feels like a statement that needs some serious backing up, since the implication is that most teachers are racist.
Assuming it true, then it’s pretty surprising how we can simultaneously call teachers heroes and racists without much debate.

The point is that this is an ingrained bias that is fundamental throughout our culture. No teacher says to themself “This kid is black, so therefore I will punish him more harshly because I am a racist”. It is far more sinister, subtle, and unconscious than that.
> If ensuring that people from marginalized backgrounds get good treatment is important in third level education, would the same arguments not apply in a much stronger fashion to first and second level?

They do, which is why [primary] school desegregation was (and remains) an important policy goal for various progressive and racial justice movements during the previous century.

edit: It may not be clear to folks who don't live in the US, but the focus on affirmative action is generally driven by the people who oppose such initiatives. The people in favor of them, as far as I can tell, largely view them as a single piece of a larger project for justice.
Looping for at least 3-4 years seems the standard in most countries. Strange to see it discussed as something "strange" or "novel" without recognizing this basic fact.
No, it doesn't! It famously doesn't! There's a whole discipline of creating arguments that are deliberately difficult to engage with or respond to: it's called "college debate".
>Given that it also has legitimate uses,

You're not addressing the point about "(a)(1)(B)(ii), which concerns reporting requirements".

If they cannot meet US law for reporting requirements, then they are breaking the law, right?
Just curious, is there a strong need out there for alternative web browsers? It’s seems like there are a lot of choices already to Chrome and Firefox: eg Opera, Brave. What’s the goal of yet another web browser?
> Too many people has apocalyptic views of the world.

Is our children learning?

I’ll start with your grammar and end with a look out my window, where smoke from forest fires currently fills the sky.
Thanks for making me chuckle. Good one :)
It's because companies got liberal with titles. Probably in part due to how fast pay has increased. It's seen as commonplace now, so people expect this fast progression.
I did exactly that a while ago combining Twine with Twison [0]. A non technical friend would write the story with Twine, compile to a JSON file, and I'd parse it with a quick script on build time so I could display it on a React web app (that I'd then make apps with, with Cordova). There were a few things that could be improved in the process but it all worked incredibly well after I hooked everything up!

[0] https://github.com/lazerwalker/twison
This paper reads like a long-form-shitpost of the highest quality. Both made me laugh and taught me something interesting. Of course, which language another uses to explain that something sounds like gibberish does not tell you anything about which is harder. And, judging by their flimsy yet insistent and very eloquent justification of their methodology, the authors were well aware of that.

It is very cool to see Chinese coming out on top. As for the Norwegian that they left blank, I'll be happy to add that we use Greek to express that something is unintelligible:

Det er helt Gresk for meg.
> You were incentivized to cram information to pass tests

I thought there was a solution: teachers give good questions for homework and exams. When I was in school, I rarely got repeated questions. Most questions challenged my understanding of fundamentals. It's hard to believe that people who only cram can ever get decent grades in tests like IIT's JEE, China's National Entrance Exam, or Japan's university entrance exams, or Korea's national entrance exams. As for the US, it's hard to imagine that anyone can solve decently hard problems in textbooks like Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics or Cormen et el's Introduction to Algorithms (The US does not mandate challenging problems in high schools, so I use examples from college).
> What makes a senior engineer?

Nothing in that article. It only means the person (probably) fits the 8 or so bullet point skills that management has said a senior engineer needs to have. And it's company specific.

If you want to be promoted, then either, ask your manager, or apply for a senior job somewhere else.

I don't get how these articles get so much traction. They are like fortune telling, just spout off some non-specific high-level items and let the audience fill in the blanks.
No, because the lower speed limits posted on flashing signs for construction are an important local case.

In my experience, Google just thinks those are traffic jams. I've seen Maps 'know' about road construction speed limits, but it isn't usual.
> It's that creating pictures adhering to a prompt with some degree of creativity is very little of what art is.

I mean, it's the majority of commercial art - you get a prompt from the client, you maybe flesh it out in a few different directions with sketches, then you refine a final piece. And AI is incredibly good at this process - instant results, infinite patience, and it's free. A very hard combination to meet.

Calendars, book covers, video game assets, green screen backgrounds....

Even in a case like video game animations, where the AI can't build every frame, it can still give you a good reference photo. From there you just need a cheap artist to fill out the frames - a huge cost savings, and a big blow to the artistic community.

Where do you get started as an artist, without any of those? Obviously, Fine Arts isn't nearly as effected, but how do you get your start when you can't build a name from your cool book covers, or get famous off Magic: The Gathering card illustrations?
> So many smartphones are thrown away in the trash each year. How many chips can be scavenged from them?

Zero!? As far as I know, chips are inherently disposable products, recyling chips is almost an impossibility in modern electronics due to reliability problems. Nearly all chip datasheets contain the warning: DO NOT solder more than twice, which is the number of passes it takes to reflow-solder the front and back side of the PCB. And even this is only possible under carefully controlled reflow oven temperature profile, the max time interval during peak temperature should be less than 10 seconds. Any extra soldering steps or heat voids all warranty, since it exposes the chip under additional thermal stresses, and may damage the chip or degrade its long-term reliability. To recycle a chip, it takes two additional passes, first to remove it from the motherboard, next to re-tin or re-ball the chips, finally to install it on new boards, by now the chip would've experienced 6 thermal-stress events.

Consider the fact that modern surface-mount technology has progressed to a point when even reliably assembling circuit boards using brand-new chips can be technically challenging for high yield - in mass production, it takes lots of tweakings, such as solder stencil opening, solder alloy selections, solderability test of the tinning on components, reflow oven temperature profile, inert gas protection, X-ray inspection, and even Scanning Electron Microscopes to perform metallurgical analysis for troubleshooting - I fail to see how recycling is ever going to work. It adds a huge number of additional uncertainties.

Sure, repair shops and R&D labs do it all the time, and it works at a small scale. But reliably doing it at an industrial scale will be extremely problematic. This is why even a functional "counterfeit" chip (salvaged and remarked) is a great cause of concern, these components have been heavily abused, and nobody should ever trust it in a piece of critical equipment. Are you going to trust your life on a car when the microcontroller chip in the ECU is a salvaged part? Or pay $700 for a smartphone if a chip has a time-to-failure of who-knows-how-long hours?

Even back in the 80s when all the chips were through-hole components, the reliability of reused components was already a problem. In the days of QFN, BGA, LGA, CSP and WLP chips, I don't see any solution at all. This is the dark side of the semiconductor industry - nearly all chips are disposable.

Nevertheless, this is a one-sided perspective from circuit board assemblers, which is what I'm familiar with. I don't know anything about electronics recycling. Thus, if there's any progress and innovation in the field of recycling, I'd love to know. Perhaps the manufacturers are overcautious on reliability and it's not really that bad?
> This feels like a statement that needs some serious backing up, since the implication is that most teachers are racist.

Actually the implication is that some teachers and/or administrators are racist. If even one teacher is racist, then that would skew the numbers a tiny bit.

"Some members of X profession are racist" is almost certainly true for any X.
In other news: Watching a video at 3x can make you learn very little but it is three times fast!
You actually have a better understanding of "what it is" than most Salesforce admins.

It's everything for everyone that they can sell licenses to.
Agreed.

And it’s not like everyone is obese.

There’s a large proportion of people who eat healthily, avoid processed food, keep their portion sizes regular and refrain from too much alcohol.

Unsurprisingly these people are in good shape despite probably being in close proximity to the plastics/chemicals described in the article.