skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It is an interesting decision point, and I get your reasoning. But, I have noticed there are a good number of websites that could be better for their users (especially mobile users), because someone just took the defaults.

Not high priority, but if Caddy would offer a report of things that aren't configured but perhaps should be...that could help. Things like Cache-control/Expires/Etag headers, Gzip/Deflate, Caching, and so on.
Is the OpenAPI json/yaml spec not available? Seems clear from the UI that this is likely using the API, but I can't find an endpoint that returns the spec.

edit: oh, it's just inline within the html source, strange
You can't send everyone an RCS message either. Juniper Research predicts the number of mobile phone users who can access RCS will reach 40% by 2026.¹

¹ https://www.techradar.com/news/nearly-half-of-phones-will-us...
Unless they tipped $0.01, I'm going to say it was too much, and even then. 5 stars and no tip is maybe unaware/forgetful. 0 or 1 star and no tip is a clear message.

And who cares if an asshole thinks you're an asshole? If someone is a complete asshole to you for no good reason, don't reward them. This is giving them way too much space to live inside your head. It smacks of a guilty conscience on the part of the victim when it should be the other way around. But in the absence of that, the least you can do is spend your money on people who will do better with it.

There are many shades between someone who is grumpy, having a bad day, in the weeds, maybe doesn't smile but still brings your food and gets the job done well (I've been this person), vs someone that directly insults you while bringing it cold after clearly ignoring you for a prolonged period (I've had this happen to me–guess what? No tip for you!).

I look at the converse situation the same way. I get pissed when places bend over backwards to accommodate customers who clearly are assholes and exploit the fact that corporates will hand out gift cards, regardless of the absurdity of the complaint or the inappropriateness of their behavior. Why would you invite someone like that back?

Signed, waiter in America for 7 years. I was stiffed twice in that time, once by an entire family that skipped the entire bill, the other by a rowdy table I had to cut off from alcohol who then threatened to shoot me after my shift. Once or twice I had some foreign tourists tip me like 4%. Even then, I averaged maybe 19% tips over the entire tenure. Everywhere from dives to white linen tables with 4 different glasses and forks; chains and indie. Never more than $2.13/hr salary.

I've never heard what parent poster said. But now that I have, I must say that I didn't think the foreign tourists thought I was an asshole or incompetent, as everything went swimmingly between us, and I also didn't think they were assholes. I worked with a ton of people who complained plenty about that kind of thing, profiled people, etc. I still wonder to this day whether the family that skipped had some sort of emergency to tend to. It sucked at the time, I wound up having to pay it out of pocket, but in the end I made bank overall. C'est la vie.

That's all to say, the world isn't so black and white, learn how to spot outliers on either side of the average, and reward the good and disincentivize the bad as best as you can. And don't get too caught up in what you think assholes' opinions of you might be.
Not at all, that was the decade personal/home computers first become available. It's also when Steve Jobs founded Apple.
Is there a better source for this? It would be a very big deal for historians and archaeologists but I just don’t trust this site.
Congratualtions on your temerity!

I looked at relate.so, and I already use a CRM that does everything listed on your website. What are the new features that relate provides compared to other CRMs?
> The idea that substance abuse is a character flaw is outdated and harmful.

Sure, once you're already physically addicted, taking the next hit isn't a character flaw. But being willing to take the first hit before you're addicted is absolutely a gigantic character flaw.
As an aside Madoff Industries did employ people who earnestly worked outside the Ponzi scheme. I know because I met a few of them when I worked on a database architecture audit for them around 2008.
This article glosses over the biggest (anti consumer) change to iPhone. The loss of the physical SIM card slot. The SIM card balanced the power between phone company and consumer. Allowing the consumer to switch carriers at will. eSIM will be like the CDMA carriers of the 90s to 2000s (Sprint/Verizon) where your phone is locked in. Carriers will undoubtedly add road blocks to make it as difficult as possible to link your eSIM from one network to the next.
Ah she is legally above the law. Not that I am criticizing the monarchy. Just curiously pointing it out.
Historical Edits of the USA Constitution
It’s really important not to make the false dichotomy of English Monarch vs French Republic. Not saying that’s happening here, but in these debates generally speaking it’s important to realise that France is exceptional and not representative when considering alternatives to England’s monarchy. A US or French style president is not the only or even the obvious alternative to an unelected head of state.
Psychedelics are not a street drug. The majority of people struggling with addiction use crack cocaine, crystal meth, and opioids. Those are not decriminalized (technically).
Isn’t this what opensecrets.org does?
The fonts do not look so strange as the odd capitalisation like "The bodies BURIED at the site lukely DIED.." - really odd.
This sounds eerily like college football in the US. “It brings in money that funds other sports and university facilities so we can’t get rid of it.”
This site just caused me to drop $750 on a new gravel bike. Thanks?
What would be the ratio between the the line (or instructions ?) you write yourself and the one you rely on (OS, environment, compiler, firmware ...) ? one in a million ?
FWIW, my position is today (and has been for many years now) that recommendation systems are inherently problematic, so you aren't exactly trapping me in some kind of contradiction or paradox here by asking me "but how else could it be done?!"... I'd argue that some things simply shouldn't be done.

In the case of social networks, I think they served a positive function to both society and the people who used them back when they didn't have the recommendation algorithms, and your feeds were curated by you choosing to follow people explicitly; this, however, was not profitable, so we are now here.

If you are to do it, then yes: I think you probably need to do what TikTok is doing, and have humans heavily involved in the recommendation system in a way that attempts to put a hand on the wheel rather than the Google way to approach problems with algorithms on top of algorithms and no humans anywhere.
Seriously caught off guard by this as well. It's not the fonts, it's the characters used:

- The ʀᴇмᴀιɴs of a tall male and sixteen female skeletons were identified among hundreds of gold and silver artefacts and thousands of coins.

- The women are presumed to have been wives and concubines of the leader, who were κιʟʟᴇᴅ to accompany the warlord in the afterlife. The amount of treasure and the number of sᴀcʀιғιcᴇᴅ animals and people immediately led the archaeologists to consider that the site was certainly the ʙuʀιᴇᴅ site of a really powerful Mongol warlord.

Not sure why certain "grim" words are in special characters.
I just meant that if people post things like "RIP" or "That's sad", it's void of information and therefore unsubstantive, but doesn't contribute to destroying the site. I just meant to repeat the point pg was making 15 years ago about "empty comments", and I'm sure the queen was the last thing he had in mind (https://news.ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html).

I was not making a case for royalism! just a case against tedious internet battles, and boy is monarchism one of those. (I mean, "Good riddance. The world is rid of a horrible person who has done horrible things" - ? Good grief. At least give us something amusing.) (that was a random example I just ran across)

More at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32771818 if anyone cares.
We were monitoring 18.5 million torrents, over 292 million IP addresses, it took a Cassandra cluster of 18 nodes just to store this information. It was writing 18,000 writes a second, 24/7.

This information was not pulled off pirate sites, it was sucked out of the distributed hash table directly. I singlehandedly wrote the code that did all of this, I have first hand knowledge of the entire system.

Part of my job was also to analyse this data, I spent a year writing reports, clustering this info, generating realtime demand graphs and segmenting different media types.

Just because you cherry pick some data about games distributed with bittorrent doesn't mean you can extrapolate entire network conclusions from that - that's first grade BS statistics right there

Piracy was probably higher than 99.99999%. It's the vast, vast, vast majority
This would have had to raise some regulatory scrutiny if it happened. Not that Apple couldn't find a way influence their way past it. Regardless, it wouldn't surprise me if Apple does announce their long-awaited Apple car in the next 12-18 months.
"Grossly extreme cost" refers to what any actual fusion plant would cost to build and operate.

ITER, even at tens of $Bs, is small potatoes compared to what a real plant would have to cost.
i’d be happy with voting information for each bill that was voted on by either house or senate.
Ironically this for teachers to help them with class activities like creating assignments as they say

> GitHub Copilot can generate coding assignments

but earlier they said

> One study found that solutions generated by GitHub Copilot placed it amongst the top 25% of students in a cohort.

So considering the both sides, students and teachers have now free access. how would this not lead to problems with evaluation metrics down the way?
According to a thread in Reddit, some guy complain in an anonymous servery of hotel he frequent, the next time he got there, the manager told him about the bad review he posted on the survey and that they can see his email, so not really anonymous, they also bothered him during his stay.
I've been hosting small and mid-sized web sites and applications for years without a hitch using my own script, written from reading it up online. It might not work exactly as is for you but perhaps can offer some reference: https://github.com/corenzan/provision
I am a former Mason. I left the lodge due to no longer complying with their requirement to believe in a higher power (God). To be explicit: Masonry used to be segregated into "Prince Hall" masonic halls (for non-white folks) and "normal" masonic halls. This split was ended, and now Prince Hall masonic halls are full masonic lodges, and membership is recognized in both directions. In practice; every lodge I ever attended was integrated even if it was a significant white majority.

When we were voting on new members, it was a silent vote with unanimous consent required. Any vote could be retaken at the order of the master. This means that if someone is eligible and should be a mason, and the vote comes up with a negative vote, the master can say a few words suggesting people reconsider and take the vote up again.

There was only once that I saw someone not pass the first ballot to become a mason. The master said that we should reconsider, and most of the brothers in the room chose not to vote the second time (as a symbol they were not the negative vote), and many of those who did showed their ballot before casting it. The second vote passed.

This as a process indicates there's plenty of room for abuse: any single master mason can anonymously vote to exclude someone for any reason they want. It's up to the folks around them to set them square if they are out of line. I can easily see an lodge existing where there wouldn't be any members willing to speak up in someone's defense.

It's my belief that none of what I've posted here is exposing any of the secrets of a master mason; but if any fraternal members disagree I'll happily edit and delete this post, and I don't intend to expose anything; but instead demonstrate that masonry (as well as, I'd assume, most other 'secret' societies), is as good as the members in the lodge.
> There is no doubt in my mind that lesser privileged kids get bullied when they get invited to an iPhone texting group and they instantly break all functionality with cheaper Android phones.

Sample size of one, but I asked my 13 y.o. daughter.

Me:

This guy believes kids get bullied for having Android phones

Daughter:

What guy

Me:

Random guy

As a kid, do people care about the blue vs green bubble thing?

Daughter:

No

Before I knew it happened when you texted an android i thought the green was special

lol
Yea but the original comment wasn’t nuanced like that. It was just a declaration of opinion which seems like flamebait to me. I was more bringing it up because only blocking one side of a flamebait war ends up looking like tacit approval of the other side, which then incenses people into even further flamewars
For me, I dislike that it is not in dark mode without some userscript
I didn't realize this was an automatic ascension to the throne, I thought he had to be coronated first.
> Doing something that has religious roots doesn't automatically make it religious

That's our point right
AFAIK the static content is cached somehow with Fresh/Deno. It's not compiled on every request.
That's very interesting. Makes you wonder how many criminals escaped justice because they had a willpower to resist temptation of fame.
Oh noes :( you should get a christmas tree next time!
Did you just compare LSD intoxication with "public drunkenness"?

Not so much "chalk and cheese" but "feather and revolver"
The idea that the UK monarchy is largely ceremonial and just a boon for tourism is an incredibly prevalent idea but apparently just good PR. We've learned the monarchy has extensively interfered with the UK's parliament legislative process and done so covertly:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/feb/08/royals-vette...
I am surprised noone mentioend the Arch Security (https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/security) page yet.

It applies to basically every distribution and has useful links at the bottom for even more tips.
Sounds like both should be illegal then?
She's iconic, unbelievably so due to the duration of her reign and all the changes she's overseen. But...Charles III and then William and Louis will become as iconic. Although she's filled the job magnificently, Elizabeth was Elizabeth at the end of the day, but the British King/Queen is immortal.
This is a very good start! What would close the loop is an endpoint to serve legally binding notices.

Consider someone with a legally recognized special need necessary for some bodily function.

For example, someone in a wheelchair wants to use a bathroom. Or two people who can't speak want to get a condom by communicating it non-verbally, by pointing at it or writing their request down on a piece of paper, but whose requests are ignored whereas speaking customers have their needs met.

In code you can just try:

try usebathroom()

catch
cant

or

try buycondomnonverbally()

catch
cant

The exact function call that makes it fail becomes obvious.

With an endpoint, you could apply the legal API to it and demand that the proprietor provide legally mandated accommodations until the failing function succeeds for the special case.

It's hard to deny you exist if there is a parking lot full of employees and you can serve them a notice by GPS lookup.

If someone made that service it would be an "oh shit, they actually mean it" moment for every unaccountable black box Establishment that skirts its accessibility obligations.

It would instantly improve the world for everyone.
don’t see it.

i would like to see a vote summary, similar to what you see on C-SPAN after a vote.
Yeah I took a class that talked about this - most people agree that what you'd end up with is companies or individuals forcing you to disclose a hash to prove you voted the way they wanted. Votes kinda need to be unrecoverable at an individual level for this. There's some cool research on "homomorphic encryption" if you want to learn more - it basically opens up the data in aggregate for analysis without being able to disclose information about any individual record in the data, but it's hard to pull off in practice
Secret societies have an air of mystique around them, but often they're just social clubs with extra steps. People are social creatures, and having something to belong to is healthy for most!
> connected UDP sockets per connection

I think I'm stumbling over terminology here, but UDP is connectionless, right? I think the QUIC protocol re-implements connections on top of it, but I've never heard of "connected UDP".

A socket pool does seem to make sense from a performance standpoint!
Is this algorithmic content?
> But what's not obvious is what happens if it did not work? What happens then? Where does the error object go? Is there something that represents the error? Hidden magic isn't good magic, in my opinion. Just be explicit.

the question mark operator simply checks if there was an error, and if there was one, it returns it. Practically, it does the same as the GO Code - and the only reason you don't know is, because you don't know Rust.

> I don't know Rust, but the example you've given implies I can not include "?" in the call and just ignore any errors entirely?

no, omitting the ? will give you a compiler error. You can ignore the error case by writing:

res1 = canFail().expect("xz didn't work");

or

res1 = canFail().unwrap();

If there's an error, the program will crash. There are other alternatives, which e.g. allow you to set 'res1' to a default value in the error case.

> Go, in comparison, does the opposite: it forces you to handle the error or literally ignore it. You cannot forget to deal with an error in Go.

As you see, there is no difference to Go... in this regard.
It's a common misconception that increasing transparency reduces the power of lobbyists, when it actually does the opposite. [0] In short, the average voter doesn't care enough to find out who added a specific line to a bill, but lobbyists care a lot and they use the additional access to monitor and influence legislators. Legislator accountability is increased with more transparency, but they become more accountable to lobbyists than to their constituents.

There needs to be a balance. A democracy that operates completely in the dark isn't much of a democracy, but Congress currently has the problem off too much rather than too little transparency.

[0] https://congressionalresearch.org/TransparencyProblem.html
Most people are fairly aware that context matters. What's illegal in one context is perfectly legal in another. These are two very different contexts.
We've banned this account for posting flamewar comments. That's not allowed here, and you've been doing it repeatedly (e.g. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32574659).

If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com and give us reason to believe that you'll follow the rules in the future. They're here: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.
No it's not a bayer arrangement. There are 4 times as many pixels, they are just being over-sampled. The sensor is not the same as the previous generation.

Each pixel is grouped together with three others for most applications (taking photos etc) but they can also be used individually (It said it could do 48MP videos)
Facebook Parent Meta Platforms Cuts Responsible Innovation Team
I think there's a strong correlation. For example, there was an Oddfellows chapter near me I checked out a few times. They turned out to be some weird sect of Wiccans. I mean, it's nice that they do good works, and I guess alls as well if they keep them separate, but I didn't intend spending time with people who pray to antlers and host nude religious gatherings. And it felt to me, perhaps in a way, they were using a known organization to 'recruit', even if they didn't see it that way.
Remember when you compare the health effects, public health or private health, of LSD and alcohol, you are making a strong recommendation for LSD.
Ketamine, is foremost a NDMA antagonist (Ki=0.25uM ), sure it act on some type of opioid receptor also as an antagonist (a blocker) (Ki=12uM at KOR2), but this effect is 50x less important. Other NMDA antagonist like PCP that don't act on the opiate receptors are as strong if not stronger at pain suppression.

Ketamine is also a direct dopamine agonist (Ki=0.5uM at D2).
The image they're using is from a 2013 excavation of a Sarmatian kurgan in the Urals: https://www.archaeology.wiki/blog/2013/09/12/the-life-of-the...
my daughter is 14, her friend makes $17 hour working at a juice store. She makes about 300/week.

In 1987 I was making about 25/hour doing programming as a senior in high school.

There are always opportunities and those opportunities are not the same in every era.

Kids today are making 100K being influencers opening toys on youtube

Kids today are making 100K playing online poker

Kids today are making $$ writing apps

Kids today are making $$ selling pot

The point is not paper delivery, the point is there is a mindset. I will never be a billionaire because I will stop trying to make money once I have "enough"
While I’m sure that used to the case, that is no longer really the case with the Masons. You can find out and read through all the different ceremonies and rites online.
As a fan of Alice Coltrane, it's kind of frustrating that NYT would bother to put this together and interview all these people and then put these tiny 30 second, completely-out-of-context audio snippets. I encourage anyone who checks the article out to listen to the complete tracks. What can you possibly get out of a 30 second clip?!
It's definitely affected me a bit today. She has a visual and historical presence in so many Canadian institutions, from her portraits hanging in my elementary school growing up, to our currency, the courts, and government itself. It's a bit hard to think of her as a real person sometimes, yet seeing Prime Minister Trudeau speak about her with glistening eyes tells me that she did more than purely her constitutional duty, but genuinely touched many, especially world leaders, with loving humility.
Support for the monarchy among all Canadians[0] isn't very different than support for the monarchy among the youngest Brits[1].

Which makes sense, to me. The Canadian experience of the world wars and subsequent decades was decidedly different than the British experience, and the role that Elizabeth played, though meaningful, wasn't as important to our cultural identity. But now that those wars are generations past, and both nations have enjoyed relative peace and comfort for some decades, the sentiments toward the monarchy are beginning to align.

0: https://bc.ctvnews.ca/canadian-support-for-monarchy-hits-low...

1: https://www.statista.com/statistics/863893/support-for-the-m...
Are your children going to be buying you a phone any time soon and do they complain about your unwillingness to learn to use a messaging app other than SMS? If no, then I don’t think you are in the group of people I was talking about when I said an iPhone is objectively better.

The context of my comment was important in that it was a response to Cook’s response about buying the questioner’s elderly mother an iPhone. It is an objectively better UX for that person. It is a product obsessively made for that person.

The context in language is important. It is impossible for me to have been giving a universal axiom because Android developers exist and an iPhone would not be objectively better for that.