skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
So when are we going to demand a closure of open plan university libraries? Why should workers get an office when paying students don’t?
To be fair, I wish HN had a substantially bigger font, for phone reading.

That's about my only complaint.

Oh, and way bigger links for my big thumbs
Eagle Mode zoomable user interface
Looks to be a pretty normal Pleroma instance.
Wow, I saw the blank page and just closed the tab. These days I rarely even bother to view the source to look for readable content. Too often there's no content at all, just ads, tracking, and JS. I went back to read what they had. It's not often I'm amused and disappointed at the same time!

One of these days I'm either going to find or end up writing a CSS blocker.
Another vote for lexica.art, extraordinary execution.
It's so people can decide for themselves how much ketchup to add.
Yes, I'm in a position to hire. Your prejudices are extreme.
> Duplicate vnodes doesnt work, so you HAVE to use some function to generate it instead?

Yes. Mutable vnodes is a huge mistake that I've done long time ago when I've tried to figure out how to write efficient diffing algorithm (2014-2015), and a lot of libraries copied that terrible idea without deep understanding why I've done it in the first place.
I understand the instinctive reaction against JSX. I did a lot of Perl and PHP way back when, when it was super common to have bits of template sprinkled hither and thither with logic woven in here and there, and it made maintainability a nightmare. When the world moved on to dumb templates and embrace of MVC, it was a huge relief. JSX felt like a regression in that regard, but in practice, I think it ends up being pretty straightforward, in part due to the lack of any real flow control inside of it, and in part because of the convention of having small functional components which return a JSX tree, rather than bits of JSX just popping up everywhere here and there.
This page makes an important point about keeping your data safe but it misrepresents what the Mandela Effect is. It gives a good definition in the first paragraph "the phenomenon of large groups of people misremembering the same fact or event in a similar way".

But further down they say "It’s a common misconception that data stored in the cloud is automatically backed up". That's not the same thing at all.
I guess the general consensus is that the coolest part of Minecraft is you play it how you want to. This time there is a global restriction on what you and cannot do, reducing this sense of freedom from the sandbox. It's hyperbolic, although I have to admit centralized _anything_ for a sandbox such as Minecraft is pretty lame.
If that's the case, it's only because you say things like "I'll never hire an Oberlin grad" anonymously, rather than signing your name to it.
Fujifilm’s new X-H2 finally pushes its APS-C camera system to higher resolution
To put it in perspective, Queen Elizabeth II reigned since before UNIX epoch.
I agree only on the point that she doesn't inherit the wrong deeds, nothing on her personally.

But the place she sits, is from the blood of millions who were enslaved, robbed and were dealt with a rather inhuman treatment to say the least. In the process empire also justified what they did was in the past and cautiously moved away from that without an inch of guilt. It is sad to see people in India/Pakistan/SriLanka mourn for her death, a pity case of Stockholm syndrome.

If as you say, she has done good in her life, she should have relinquished the power, disowned the wealth which was directly a result of the horrific colonialism and imperialism. Or at least have some decency and apologise, give back the stolen wealth as a good gesture. Now I wonder, if she would have given up imperialism out of her own volition if she was in power during that period. I am inclining towards No.. it was convenient she didn't have to oversee those horrors.

It has been more than 70 years and even now, they hold their crown so precious adorned with the Diamonds taken away forcefully from our lands. What an absolute shame!

There are unheard horrors from the colonial countries, which will ache even the stone hearted. Bringing all this in perspective, we don't think she's Kim, but we have the same respect or the lack of it for anyone in their legacy.
Err, what's wrong with a lump of Galena? The old cat's whisker?
Look at the methods. The most accurate title would be: "Americans taking online surveys for pennies consistently overestimate how much culture has changed." I went into more detail here [1], but the sample is based on Amazon Mechanical Turk/Prolific. This survey is not just only Americans (or at least those that can pass for such; they had to be able to answer: "students in their second year of high school are called sophomores, that granola would be an unusual dish to serve at a Fourth of July barbecue, and that dialing 911 connects the caller to emergency services"), but an extremely biased subset of such.

[1] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32775623
I've noticed this too. It definately is by product.

Since I buy lots of weird stuff, my delivery times are all over the place. Some items can be obtained same day (if I buy enough $$), or overnight. Some "Prime" sales can take a week to ship.

I also see different geo areas get targetted for certain days. Like my home address tends to get things Wednesday and weekends. My office building gets things on Fridays, and Amazon knows enough that weekend delivery doesn't work.

So to me, it seems like they are aiming for an "average", keep certain things close, make people happy with real short delivery, but if you get weird stuff, you are probably going to be less happy overall with longer shipping delays.
Maybe it's ok to have a Queen, but I'm not so sure about Kings. Men in un-elected positions of power have very rarely done any good.
I've never been homeless though I have spent plenty of time in a tent or in other unconventional accommodations that were suited for the occasion.

I grew up spending most of my time outside and as a result I can appreciate the difference between a night spent under the stars and a night spent in your own comfortable home. I tend to linger outside and to gravitate outside if I visit someone else. There's a lot going on and it keeps me connected to things that are important to me.

Modernity does make you blind to many things simply because there is no opportunity for exposure to them and there are too many distractions, many of which you can carry in a pocket or wear on a wrist. Stepping away from can keep you grounded though.
If Microsoft wanted to extinguish self-hosted servers, all they would have to do is stop releasing the server jars and/or turn off authentication for non-Microsoft servers. They wouldn't spend so much time and energy pushing a controversial chat monitoring feature.
Unfortunately a certain segment of people reject the agency of individuals, and see things only in terms of "identity". If someone who is considered part of a "marginalized" group commits a crime, this segment of the population doesn't put the responsibility for the crime on the individual, but on social and historical grievances suffered by whatever "marginalized" demographic the criminal has been arbitrarily assigned. Ironically (but unsurprisingly) it is is lost on this segment that it is incredibly demeaning to treat people like they have no agency or autonomy, and are simply agents of their environment.
It's in any case unlikely for a French speaker to mispronounce "happiness" as "a penis".
Possibly, could also just be they were expensive to keep around and an MSSP wormed their way in with the promises of lower costs for the same compliance.

The thing about slowly firing your security people is that they're high risk; fire them one at a time with long notice periods and you could have a situation on your hands. Fire them all at once (hopefully with generous severance packages) and you avoid that problem altogether.
The thing is back in the day 35,000 modules on CPAN was a big deal but if you look at https://modulecounts.com that's since been dwarfed by Python/PyPI (398,000), Ruby/Rubygems (173,000), PHP/Packagist (351,000) and JS/npm (2,116,000).
That's a good idea, I will add that to our free hugo themes site @ https://hugo-templates.netlify.app
I, too, would love to live in this magical world of bad math.

Let's check your numbers one at a time. Here's your premise:

> If every US citizen was required to pay a one-time tax of $200 towards the fund, that'd be close to $70B, which is a good start. At a conservative 5% annual return, the fund would begin growing by $3.5B/yr. After 3 generations, or 60 years, the fund would probably be over half a trillion dollars and increasing faster than ever. In another 3 generations, just part of the return could pay everyones' taxes and still have plenty left to keep growing the fund.

260 million US adults * $200 = $52,000,000,000 invested in 2022

(already off by 25% in step 1... let's see where this goes)

$52 billion at 5% annually = $2,600,000,000 / year

Per your instructions ("3 generations, or 60 years"), we wait for 60 years, at which point the $52 billion will have grown to $971 billion.

Wait another 60 years ("another 3 generations"), at which point the fund has grown to $18 trillion.

So, it's now the year 2142. Your fund has $18 trillion to work with. The US population is only projected to grow to about 450 million, with about 350 million adults. At 5%, this would generate $900,000,000,000 / 350,000,000 = $2,571 each year per citizen.

(at this point, you somehow came to the conclusion that the fund could generate $5 million annually per citizen, which is off by over 19,000%! Any time you have inputs like $200/person and outputs like $5 million/person, that's a sign that you might want to step back and reflect on your logic.)

So already we're in a pretty disappointing place. All that work, over a century of saving, and we're only getting returns of $2.5k per person?

But wait, it gets worse - $2.5k sounds like a modest amount of money in 2022. What kind of purchasing power will it have in 2142? Well, one way to guess is to see what $2.5k today would have equated to in 1902:

About $75.

That's how much extra purchasing power you'll be passing on to your great-great-great grandkids with this scheme. The equivalent of someone giving you a "free" $75/year, today.

Congratulations, you've reinvented a savings account!

If it were possible to park one-time investments of low amounts ($200) into low-risk vehicles (5%), wait a century or two, and get to "won't need to work or ever worry about housing and feeding themselves again" money, then our whole monetary system would have imploded long ago.
It's common. Look at an old person's hands, especially one with arthritis.
Microsoft lost my copy of the game during the account transfer.

Despite me having an account, that had both re-downloaded the game and played it just a few weeks earlier, had a custom character skin stored in it, and other stuff - they claimed I didn't actually ever own Minecraft, and demanded I provide proof of purchase.

I provided as much as I could - including security questions+answers (which I had stored in my KeePass database, together with the password) - but I could not provide the original purchase email, since I lost access to that email years earlier.

Their support was quite hostile with just the thinnest veneer of superficial politeness on top. They refused to tell me why they believed I don't own the game. They refused to tell me what I could do to get my copy back (other than providing that email, that I no longer had).

Basically I was considered guilty unless I could proof my innocence - and they wouldn't accept any other proof than the original confirmation email.

And that's how - after nearly 10 years - I stopped being a Minecraft player. There's no way I'm going to repurchase the game and play again - not after being treated like that.
I don’t think it’s dual use for ML, I think it’s more about edge compute. Someone correct me if I’m wrong but I think radar resolution is compute bound so an order of magnitude or two could defeat stealth.
I don't want to make the whole line a comment. I just wanna add a comment where the language don't want me to.
A couple thoughts.

I've had an ErgoDox for almost 9 years.

I wrote my thoughts after a year here [0].

I use the Norman layout which I'm generally pleased with but don't know if the finger travel buys you that much. More important to me had been leveraging both thumbs to hit commonly used keys and modifiers.

In the last week, I was made aware of the miryoku layout and made a Norman version. (Prior to COVID-19, I traveled quite a bit and thought about getting a gergoplex for travel which would require a smaller layout like miryoku). It was like learning to use the ErgoDox all over (so I pulled out my extra ErgoDox with my normal layout). Time will tell if I commit to learning it.

I like the ErgoDox but admit that it is an acquired taste and you should get a keyboard that works for you.

That said, were I buying a keyboard today, I would get the Kinesis 360.

0 - https://hairysun.com/revisiting-the-ergodox.html
The biggest hypocrisy is that in realm of modern era, do the monarchs have role to play? UK must move on from monarchy and become republic.

The commonwealth nation should also do that. It time for the UK to move into a new era.
This is too real. It happens very frequently even with relatively structured data.
I still have the success email in gmail.

From <bingo@patreon.com>
To <my@email>

According to gmail both SPF and DKIM pass, so I know my payment went to Patreon.

Mitm attacks possibly, but I highly doubt it.
I'm a huge advocate of free software, but I've never actually seen a _true_ solution to the incentive problem when it comes to developing free software. Sure, there are ways to monetize free software projects, but honestly, if you want to make a lot of money, grow a company, hire developers and grow a huge user base, then closed source only benefits you (unfortunately).

I'm not really sure how we can change that, specially because of the already widespread perception that free software must also be free as in beer (which I guess will always be true, and it's exactly the reason so many companies choose closed source).
Millions already! Where do all the prompts and images come from? How are they collected?
You can organize a boycott for any conceivable reason, the reason doesn't have to make logical sense, be politically correct, or moral.

Do you believe business are entitled to your money? And if they no longer earn your business they should be able to sue you?

This perversity happened during the Civil Rights movement, white business owners sued blacks who caused them financial losses for refusing to patronize their racist establishments.
A terrific companion piece I found trying to locate an explanation of "brain wrap":

http://www.hypocritereader.com/11/brain-wrap

The whole piece is worth your time to read, but here's the essence of brain wrap:

> Matt also shows me how to work the platter system. Forget everything about film being stored in upright reels, the classic two-humped silhouette of the old-school projector. In the modern multiplex, film is stored off to the side of the projector on horizontal platters. This saves theaters time by eliminating the hassle of rewinding. A basic reel-to-reel system can only move film from the outside of one reel to the inside of another, reversing its order in the process. In a platter system, film is pulled up from the inside of one platter, run through the projector, and collected on the inside of another platter, ready to be shown again. Of course, every solution carries along its own problems, and the problem with spooling film from the inside can be best illustrated by wrapping a string around your finger, then yanking on it. Instead of unwrapping neatly, the coils of string just get pulled tighter around the center. Similarly, a projector’s endless hunger for film can pull the reel into thousands of tight, black ringlets. If these twists ever enter the projector, you have a gigantic mess on your hands.

> The machine responsible for preventing this disaster is called the brain, a squat cylinder that sits at the center of the sending platter. Film moves from the inside of the reel, through the brain, and out to the projector. When the brain’s arm is up, the projector pulls film as normal, but now the film coils around the brain instead of around itself. When the tension from this wrap builds up, it pulls the brain-arm down, telling the platter to rotate in reverse and unwrap the excess film. The brain can malfunction in many ways, but the most common is called a “brain wrap.” This happens when the brain fails to sense the tension building up around it and allows the film to wrap forever. Friction builds up and the rate of film going to the projector slows, or tries to slow. Projectors must take in film at a rate of 24 frames per second, and they will bring the entire booth crashing down around them before accepting anything slower. The film may slow down, but the sprockets keep their own time, and their teeth will shred any film that resists. Usually, the film just breaks, but sometimes, Matt tells me, the friction can build up so high that it burns instead.
These tests are performed routinely. I can't find the reference but i believe it's every two weeks or so.
When doing this for scientific protocols I found that you basically have to give up any hope of specializing types of things. The domain ontology for documenting processes, be they making cupcakes or electron micrographs, has to be matched to the domain in question.

Some might say that for processes this means everything must be extremely abstract in order to avoid edge cases like those encountered by the author. However, I would argue that from the perspective of someone executing a recipe they do not care at all about whether something is edible or food or not, they only care how much they need of something (count is a unit(less) of measure). Thus, the ontology proposed by the author is not matched to the domain.

The first mistake was trying to make a distinction between food and non-food. What if I used paper cupcake cups? They may not technically be food, but I have certainly eaten parts of them before by accident. Other parts of the system might care about food/non-food, but these parts are constrained by a separate and likely orthogonal set of use cases.

I don't usually need to know the chemical formula for sodium bicarbonate to order it from a vendor, but if I need to automatically calculate stoichiometry for reactions so that I can automatically order the correct amount then I might. Those two parts of the system can and should be completely orthogonal to each other and thus fully decoupled.

Therefore, I would suggest that encountering something that looks like "edge case poisoning" is a sign that you have not properly factored the system.
I was more on the "what has Oberlin learned" part of it.
Digital cinema projectors also used Xenon, but the industry changed to laser a few years ago.
With seaweed at least there is also many possibilities for usage as building materials linke roofing, insulation and bricks

https://youtu.be/g8SQNRXDklk
Do you also hold that against Liz Truss? She and Queen Elizabeth played equal parts in those atrocities; ie none, even though they are part of the same institutions that did have a part in that history.
Ideally, the OP should have clarified it as "QEMU-KVM", since QEMU has a plethora of other use cases than a VMM (e.g. qemu-user, qemu atop Hyper-V/Xen/Hypervisor.Framework, cross-architecture emulation) that are more-or-less used just as often.

It shouldn't be a problem for already knowledgeable readers, but it _might_ give false impression that QEMU only works as a KVM-only VMM monitor to others.
Notes as Closure
Canada had no equivalent of the Glass-Steagall Act, but its banks didn't suffer like the US banks did. Why would the seperation of commercial and investment banks only be important in the United States and not in other countries?
Most of the UK also burns effigies of a person (a Catholic domestic terrorist in this case) on bon fires every year.
> I've found in the US they give you a dry burger and then more sachets than you need of sauce. Which you then take and add yourself.

Could you name a major fast food or fast casual chain that does this? Because it’s not typical. If not ketchup, a burger will have its standard option of a “special” usually Russian dressing style sauce option (the Big Mac special sauce, Shake Shack shack sauce, INOB spread, etc) - you can ask for ketchup, mustard and mayo to be added at any major fast food or fast casual chain - if it’s not standard. You can hold any condiment as well. The sachets are usually for fries.
May be I'm just wrong, but the plots do show some changes, but I don't know how much we can fault people for not knowing exact percentages. A lay person estimating 40% is close enough to 50% for me.
What do you mean disappointing? I have consistently been getting the best results with pythran. That said it is strongly focused on numerical code, so your milage might vary for other code. You also should add compiler optimisation flags to get the best performance.

Regarding Nutika AFAIK its goal is not a speed up and performance gains are pretty modest in most cases.
Yeah, except... the technicalities make it seem like no, but in reality use context CAN replace redux a lot of times. The power of redux is often unnecessary (or just gets in the way, really), and context is enough.

Your post makes it seem like they are wildly different when in fact they often meet the same need. Use context is helpful precisely because it can replace redux in many situations.

It doesn't really matter how different they are under the hood. Redux is often used only as a global store of state, and context makes that much easier... even globally.

Maybe redux is good for some edge cases, but otherwise it's just overengineered bloat. Context is much more elegant and intuitive. There's no reason to force yourself to use the Flux pattern if you don't have to. I'd certainly never add redux to a project unless I absolutely needed to, it's such a pain...
Who speaks for Oberlin, how can a college slander?

"local speech codes" = whatever offends the sensibilities of small town Ohioans.
I haven't read anything by Bukowski, out of fear that his outlook might be infectious.
Flying direct vs hub and spoke. To Ibiza. Plus a 100 less potential Covid carriers.

Bigger planes can be more comfortable but a large factor is wing loading. Many smaller jets have higher ratios. IMO, the most comfortable airliner in turbulence was the MD-80, which had a tiny wing.

https://turbli.com/blog/the-best-planes-to-fly-through-turbu...
>However, they don't mention any of the emails/texts that came out between administrators for some reason, which is what put the nail in the coffin for Oberlin.

Yes, I was "amused" to see Oberlin's FAQ on the case (<https://www.oberlin.edu/news-and-events/bakery-litigation/fa...>) describe Raimondo's texts as

>Yes. Some senior administrators and faculty did use unprofessional language in a few text messages and emails well after the protest. Appropriate disciplinary action was taken in response to this behavior.

I doubt that.
That old story that marijuana impairs maths capability until you stop smoking, while alcohol impairs judgement coordination etc.
I wonder if all those science articles were accurate, and whether it applies in this case.
Charles Bukowski is shit. There, I wrote it.
> Every couple of months one of his friends will get banned for no reason

Are they seeing the exact same screen as the one in the original post? There are two separate systems at play, each individual server has moderation by those who host the server (wherein they can ban anyone for any reason) and there is now a global moderation system introduced very recently, which is run by paid moderators hired by Microsoft.

You said "every couple of months" but this system did not exist before last month, at least on the Java edition of the game.