skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Is there any video of gameplay?

The description in Google Play page doesn't say anything to me (I find it confusing), I don't understand how is it played, so I am not sure if I even want to download it to try :(
Parents can want only appropriate books. But parents getting to decide what is and what is not appropriate for all children isn't something we should strive for. Some parents think books on sexual health are not appropriate, others think books on race relations are not appropriate, some think books speaking badly about Trump's presidency are not appropriate while books that speak positively on his presidency are. Why should one parent's opinions affect another parent's children?

It is rather concerning to many people that some people want to decide what children can and can not be taught or allowed to find out about.
It's true that someone rich won't be especially bothered by fee-and-dividend, even though they're paying out more than they're getting back. It won't be an effective tool for reducing the emissions of rich people.

It's also true that a person with lower-than-average emissions will pay out less than they get back. They'll have a strong incentive to reduce emissions, but even if they don't reduce emissions they'll be better off than before. These people will be the majority.

The people who might feel worse off are those who emit a bit more than average without being rich. They'll need to modify their behaviors if they want to come out ahead. Of course that's part of the whole point.

A lot of people might actually be ok with changing their behaviors, if they know everybody's doing it so it will actually make a difference. Right now we have this public goods situation where the outcome is going to be the same regardless of what you personally do. Dealing with public goods situations is the main reason for taxes in general; it's hard to fund roads with voluntary donations, so most people are ok with paying taxes for roads.

The other benefit of fee-and-dividend is that it makes low-carbon energy sources more competitive. It's not just about getting people to carpool or whatever, it's about getting fossil fuels off the grid and the roads, because they just can't compete.

Of course if that works, the end result might be higher prices that don't get reflected in the dividend. But we don't end up in a apocalyptic nightmare, so there's that.
Not really trying to cancel the author here, it's just an interesting comparison to make.

It feels like either the author is trying to invoke the murder of villages during the Vietnam War as a way of lending weight to their argument about licensing changes, or they view the example of village destruction during the Vietnam War as something trivial enough to be in this post about licensing changes. Both of which feel odd.

Whatever it is, it's the second sentence of the post and is literally written as a comparison to the license change statement from Lightbend, so it feels like the author intended it to be important.
Questions about the hard limits of human intelligence
It's weird how phones went to 100M with their tiny sensors, but APS-C cameras stayed at 20M.

Anyway with used FF cameras now well under $1000, I have no idea why anybody would buy an APS-C camera. Even if you love some APS-C lens, you can just mount it on a FF camera and crop. Usually the camera will show you the cropped view in the viewfinder, but raw photos are taken at full resolution for you to manually crop later.
Show HN: 1paragraph – a browser-based, offline-first ePub reader
> It looks impossible to me to deliver a quality (or even just working correctly) code for rather complex puzzle in 40 minutes.

FAANG interviews have been gamified to death at this point. Trying to solve the question at the spot is a losing battle. Your best bet for FAANG coding interviews is to just practice leetcode and after a point you'll be able to find patterns and reproduce solutions in reasonable time.

To get a perspective on this: think from the perspective of a FAANG interviewer. Say, they are 3 years out of college and have been asked to take an interview. Do you really think they'll be cooking up fresh new interview questions or just going on leetcode and picking their fav question so that they can get done with the interview and get back to their sprint deadline?

> So how do I get to faang or other company with comparable benefits if their all interviews seem to be heavily biased towards quick

Their interviews are biased towards prep and not much thinking imo.
I love Dutch understatement.
The rich person will also receive a much smaller portion of their income in the rebate (and then pay 1000x the poor person for their flights and to fuel their yacht, and 100x to cool their house with glass walls and run their pool, etc etc).

The tax is mildly regressive and the rebate is extremely progressive. The poor person who makes all those lifestyle changes in response to the tax is much better off than they were as the upper bound on their contribution sans rebate is less than what they were paying to begin with.

So stop your fake concern for the poor who would have more options, and more spare cash.
Google checks browser user agents, and does not show these on non-Chrome browsers, which is more likely to be the reason why you aren't seeing it.
People that think UML is dead are people that work in companies with terrible engineering practices.

I haven't been in a single decent team that didn't use UML to some extent for designing components.

I just don't see how you could do a design review with your team without using UML.
Rule of law and breaking the law are two very different things.

As for examples, look at the Dutch childcare benefits scandal. That alone should tell you enough about why GP claims the rule of law not only being eroded, but also why the majority is doing this to itself. It was a massive scandal with huge consequences for many victims. Yet, many individuals still haven't been fully compensated, the news has largely stopped reporting it, the majority has stopped caring, and the authorities in question have barely changed their modus operandi.
I’m sure that you understood the important differences, but there are likely many readers who didn’t (many more programmers are familiar with Python than with mypy). When you write “even if we don’t have P, we’d have Q anyway”, the reader is left with the impression that P and Q are somehow interchangeable or equivalent or comparable—that P is unimportant in the presence of Q. I think it’s instructive to point out that this impression would be mistaken, and the paper’s result of P is interesting and consequential.
Doing stuff in secret removes it from democratic control and democratic decision processes. So it has something to do with democracy, not just the rule of law.
title should be renamed to: "How to make logo design sound more important than it is."

There are blogs and blogs about logos from successful well known brands, on how well they are designed, their process, their history, their typography etc but no one gives a rats ass about logos from mom and pop shops or your average small business even if they were designed really well. designers really need to stop this hypocrisy.

The only difference between a Fiverr designed branding and something that's designed by an agency is that the agency is able to make up a justification on why a logo costs a $100k.

a senior well accomplished designer had once told me, the logo does not make the business or a brand, the business is what makes a logo.

Nike will still sell the same number of shoes without the swoosh and Apple will probably sell the same number with a different logo.

We as Brand/Logo designers really need to humble ourselves and really listen to our customers, help their business, try to summarize their vision with appropriate branding/logo but stop defining the business for them.
Makes me think of “To Rome With Love” where one of the characters can only sing opera if they are having a shower. So they put a
shower on stage.

Showers do nothing for my thinking but walking alone in a park or countryside (no people and not even a dog) does.
> The applicable cliche here is "the perfect is the enemy of the good." I may be misreading your point, but the way this reads to me, it's kinda a reductio ad absurdum of the concept of law in general, no?

I'm asking questions about how it is and how it could be, not arguing that short of perfection we should ban it all.
Freedom of assembly and movement, for one. My country had seventy days of armed soldiers out to enforce a lockdown. That was done by completely violating the constitution and the rule of law. It was done with an administrative act, bypassing all checks and balances.

Afterwards, a year later unvaccinated people were denied access to public transport and even work (note that a mandate would've been lawful instead, just not the vaccine pass scheme implemented).

All of this with an overwhelmingly high support for these measures. It was a de facto tiranny of the majority.
Specific to the Netherlands, there was a scandal where the government was discriminating against minorities with regards to child benefits - unlawfully demanding the return of benefits and putting thousands in debt as a result. The government resigned - only to be re-voted in with the coalition being comprised of the exact same parties as before.
Ask HN: What are your top open source repo management practices/tools?
I realized that there is no good consensus on this topic. Genuinely, interested in understanding if there are playbooks/"lessons learned"/great tools for automation to maintain and manage repos. For context, I am considering maintaining a lean python repo for the first time and weirdly not that many helpful guides around.
This seems like a good thread to mention the YouTube channel 'Reducible', it's like 3Blue1Brown for algorithms:

https://www.youtube.com/c/Reducible
> I did mention it, that's what the Haber process produce ..

Yes, and I did read it.

I was trying to put emphasis on the huge cost in the form of near endless energy.

Just mentioning the process as if it somehow miraculously solved the problems for all time is misleading, since the world is now facing the challenge to basically stop using this method.
Because it wasn't sustainable.

It only worked because it relied on stored energy, which is A, going to be used up some time and B, should be left in the ground because CO2 emissions must be reduced/stopped.
Good luck if you ever get security audited.
I can't decide what's harder, whether it is writing a non-mainframe GDS from scratch, or replacing 100% of a mainframe GDS by common Red Hat / Suse servers while staying 100% in business.

Also, most IATA standards I've read are littered by the statement "or a different convention by bilateral agreement between the parties" multiple times per page, so documentation only gets you halfway there. Having actual customers and defining how each customer deviates from the standard is the harder half.
"The network is down, why are we paying the sys admins?"

"The network is running perfectly, why are we paying the sys admins?"
Oh and even afterwards protests were forbidden for a while to "avoid hurting the economic recovery". Again, most were favorable.
FYI: https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/fasting...

But as to the mechanism... not a scooby.
It always was that way. The only thing that's changed is that information that was tightly controlled by governments via a small but powerful set of mainstream media channels to advance the notion of an open society that played by a tight set of rules and respect for civil rights has started to unravel by the democratization of news disbursal.
I said "all our current power" and I mentioned my source.
It's credited to Jason Lyon
One shortcoming (though it's nice that Python has this) of this is that this isn't checked for exhaustiveness by the compiler (because there isn't a Python one) which makes it easy to forget cases and introduce bugs.

Not sure if there are any runtime checks for this?
Haven't really read TFA because I can't be arsed to deal with NYT and ther asinine style of writing, so I'm assuming we're talking about a public school district and its associated public libraries.

Being public libraries, I assume there are official channels with which to convey opinions to the powers that be, and proper procedures that must be followed to permit or not permit books from being included in a library's collection.

What's more, being public, it's reasonable to assume the libraries are funded in majority from taxpayer money.

So personally: If the taxpayers who provide the money for the library are unsatisfied with the library's book selection, file formal complaints, and the books are subsequently removed as applicable, I see no problem.

And ultimately: Taxpayers (aka voters) have the ultimate and absolute authority to just rescind funding for public libraries and/or school districts with objectional collections if they refuse to comply with complaints and other such requests and demands.
Third-Polarizing-Filter Experiment Demystified – How It Works
I take it this is a joke. Care to explain?
> Who will they sell their homes to?

As with many such large scale problems, the state will probably take care of that by bearing these costs and distributing them among the citizens.

It's not a good way, but it should work.
> hence the nightmare in Europe right now.

Ah yes. Everything that is not solar or wind had massive failures due to market and climate.

The small contribution from the solar and wind is operating about as per normal.

Must have been because we built too much solar and wind, not too little.

What a hilariously bad argument.

> That doesn't even factor in the fossil fuels and emissions that need to be expended to create those renewables (which are greater than the individual renewable will ever offset in its lifetime).

This is a strict multiple of energy payback time, which is somewhere between 6 months and 5 years with current generation panels, and 1 month to 3 years with wind. Depending on how far down the fossil fuel pipeline that goes up a bit, but you have to multiply your fossil fuels by the same factor. It's so far from equal that it's not worth considering, and it gets further from equal as the renewable portion of silicon refining and composite manufacture increase.
It's the same as someone trying to mimic a style. Nothing wrong with that. Certainly not something you could get copyrights from.
My philosophy that one should make note taking system as effortless as possibly, once you over-engineer it becomes a chore
Edit a merge commit with Git rebase
The fact that you are so nonchalantly dismissing the statement of someone like Walter should make you take a long hard look at yourself, your beliefs and your though processes.

Water usage is just as elastic as any other consumption behavior. Heck, I halved mine this year by simply selectively letting parts of my yard dry up in this hot summer. And enterprises can pass increased prices on to the final product.
How I extracted some Apple private keys from the macOS Server app
Okay, if you want to remove books about farts in the kids section (and books about how to get dressed, those are super offensive), why not.

But what is appropriate for teens? Because 1984 is way more traumatizing than a Modern romance or Heavy. The last part, with the psychological torture and mind control? Inappropriate, we should remove it from school libraries and stop the book just before the arrestation. Re-edit the book without the last part, which isn't the part we use to attack our political opponents anyway, we will still be able to misuse the word novlang. Name it "appropriate 1984" and put it back on the shelf. I remember I couldn't eat for a day after i read about the arrestation and the subsequent torture in the book, at 14. Remove that part for teenagers please, its safer. And appropriate.
I found this really useful just now as I had to rebase to edit a merge commit that was signed so I could sign it in order to meet my branch protection rules on GitHub
So I am a (former) quantum physicist (though the wrong kind, an experimental–elementary-particles type rather than a theoretical–condensed-matter type) and am now an electrical engineer, and I can say with confidence, bipolar junction transistors are hard to really understand. I don't think I've ever seen a single explanation that goes through it all in an understandable way.

In particular, factors that have to be considered are the built-in potentials of the space charge layers (aka depletion zones), and the different doping profile of the collector versus emitter. The doping is very important, and is often neglected. But without it, transistors would basically operate equally well in forward mode as in reverse, and they definitely don't do that. These two things have a big effect on the Fermi/band-bend diagram and probably help clear up your last point.

I barely feel like I actually understand these things on a good day, and I pay the bills with them....
At least some of those aspects are only temporary, if they are an issue at all: Already in the 90s we had 10MB games that were shipped on a CD with the rest of the CD being filled with the game soundtrack as CD Audio. Pirating the whole game including the soundtrack was unrealistic for most people back then, but these days you'd laugh at the size. The same will be true for this generation's "huge" games in just a few years. The real obstacle to preservation are the DRM schemes you mentioned.
A16 in iPhone 14 Pro is 17% Faster Than A15 in iPhone 13 Pro
If floats are used than there is no absolute deterministic behaviour accross different machines. It can never be guaranteed.
Guessing from the number (168), probably second year? So not too basic if that's what you're implying
Live in the pod, eat the 3-headed radioactive bugs ...
> first they came...

If they "came for" all the books in a particular library, you (as a parent) could check the book you wanted out from another library, or buy it from a bookstore, or download it from a sketchy drive link you find on google, or recover it from an airdrop of literary material dropped into your occupied zone.

These books are "banned" in the same way that Starbucks red cups are "banned" in July.
Four years ago I worked at a company in the Fortune 500 that still used DOS for their main system.

As you say, the switching cost is way too high and dangerous. They moved billions and billions of dollars daily through a highly complex structures and complex laws in different jurisdictions across the USA. The business logic was built over the 40 years when the world was DOS. It's not like they are dumb and don't know linux or Windows exist and all that.

They brought in huge consulting companies all the time to see if they could get it upgraded, but no programming house, no consulting company would touch it. These consulotants turned down hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars, because 1) it was just too f-ing complex, and 2) if they messed up, the liability would be immense because of the dollars daily transactions, and what the dollars were used for. It would be an absolute shit-show of the first order if things were to go sideways. I'm positive that these consulting companies E & O (errors and ommissions) insurance company would refuse to insure them. Doing it wrong would be catastrophic on a corporate, but also national level. It would not be a matter of some stick-it notes from 3M not getting to the stores on time, or shoes getting to the shoe stores.

So, DOS in 2020.
In 80s there was a man (forgot his name) who claimed that one day you could store an entire high res movie on a floppy disc. One day he might be right when AI can regenerate sequences of seeds to images/video. You just need a petabyte of models stored somewhere.
Blog posts are one thing, this wasn't even a blog post though!
> It was a de facto tiranny of the majority.

Isnt that democracy anyway?
>Why should one parent's opinions affect another parent's children?

When you start dealing with public institutions, aka Other Peoples' Monies(tm), you don't get to say your way or the highway, one way or another.

Anyone is welcome to make their own private school and library as they see fit with their own private money and time. But if you are going to peruse public schools and libraries, opinions from various people (namely the taxpayers, aka voters) have to be gathered and reconciled into a final consensus which may or may not be to your liking.
> I was thinking that the vast majority of those topics should be pretty much standard knowledge for a mathematically trained computer scientist

Well yes, this is literally that mathematical training.
I got that idea from the fact that an ethanol conversion kit costs about 300 bucks and installs in 15 minutes.
Wow, this makes me wonder if our understanding of capitalism is all wrong.

Capitalism is about amassing resources ahead of time and then trying to buy time, create a stalemate and wait it out until the other party has run out of resources and must give up.

Fighting a war accellerates the rate of capital exhaustion and destroys existing capital. Because everyone starts from a blank slate people do not have enough capital to waste on outwaiting their opponent and they instead focus on cooperation resulting in a few wonderful economic decades until everything goes bad again as people use their amassed capital to fight each other.
The opposite is also true, in a sense. The secret court was created by an elected government, technically held accountable by people that can loudly say, “that is not okay and is why we are electing someone else.”

In practice it really doesn’t work that way, though.
For that, you can look at France for example:

Some times ago, there use to be constant demonstrations against the government in Paris. The police governor of the region requested police to do a lot of harmful and possibly unlawful actions and tactics. Resulting in a lot of casualties (broken eyes, concussions, ...) And more trouble as the strategies were forcing people in more aggressive and violent positions that they would have been.

All of these methods were previously forbidden especially because it was known to be harmful and against civil rights.

Still they continued without conséquence as they said that "they are the police, they can decide what is the understanding of the law".

Same things for the police using "drones" to monitor civilian without authorization. But still, no consequence...
Seems like it fails if you have an AMD GPU instead of an Nvidia one (at least that's my guess, based on the error contents):

ERROR: for stable-diffusion Cannot start service stable-diffusion: failed to create shim: OCI runtime create failed: container_linux.go:380: starting container process caused: process_linux.go:545: container init caused: Running hook #0:: error running hook: exit status 1, stdout: , stderr: nvidia-container-cli: initialization error: load library failed: libnvidia-ml.so.1: cannot open shared object file: no such file or directory: unknown
How does Safari's blocking compare with what uBlock Origin can do in full-blooded Firefox? For example, does it support CNAME uncloaking?[1]

[1] https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-b...
Battlefield 1942 turns 20 today
Policy-makers have in the main one primary concern which is that they remain policy-makers. Everything else is secondary to that.
Aerospace Engineers, Aviation Professionals- let me know what you think
Hi All! Our startup is pivoting into a space (what a pun) that we have struggled with ourselves.. Aerospace. I dropped out of my Space Eng PhD after struggling to find opportunities in my area, and we're hoping to change that. If you love space, are studying something to do with space/aviation, want to pursue a career in it one day, or are already working in the industry - please comment some of the challenges you have found within the industry! Anything from finding jobs, meeting requirements, seeking out opportunities.