skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Nearly all of them? Except for the credits specifically for producing oil or the trade definition of crude oil.

LIFO is illegal in some countries but is acceptable under GAAP. The Oil industry is not special here.

Percentage depletion is the IRS standard for non-renewable resources. Again, oil is given the same percentage as copper: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/613

Passive loss exception is also standard: https://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc425

The IRS maintains a nicely detailed guide on how tax deductions work: https://www.irs.gov/publications/p535 Almost no one would say a business deducting COGS would be a "subsidy".
None of that is relevant. The article about a mechanism to trigger fat cravings regardless of taste.

Your namesake avoids the problem entirely.

https://blackbeltmag.com/chuck-norris-anti-aging/dinner

> [Chuck Norris] stopped eating red meat, processed oils, and fat some time ago.
Back in my day we could search for child elements with specific attributes without needing the intermediate elements to know anything about it.

What REALLY happened is the shadow DOM. People decided it was too slow and created an intermediate representation. That then created all kinds of OTHER problems that started resulting in solutions that wouldn't have been necessary without the shadow DOM.

A shadow DOM is basically a cache, with all the problems that entails.
I have the opposite feeling. It's so much more convenient and efficient for me to communicate in text, largely because I can gather my thoughts and present them in a structured fashion. Which then becomes a reference as needed.
Logically, there must have existed some time when money was generally agreed upon, and nobody started manipulating its supply yet. It was probably a very local setup, changing in time from one place to another. I imagine it was also all if it in ancient history.
> Less oil being pumped globally would be beneficial to American oil companies.
In the short term, yes. There is a point when you ruin the whole industry. Right now $4/gallon gas has no good alternatives, but at $15/gallon things like e-fuels and biofuels start competing quite nicely.
I find this interesting because the string you just provided you feel is something so ubiquitous that everyone knows what you're talking about.

It may as well be a foreign language to me, but webpack? Webpack is easy... To me.
Unused variables don't make a program incorrect. When you comment out unused variables to prevent Zig's compiler error you don't remove the dead code, you in fact make it more likely to stay in the codebase because now it's only visible to humans. While almost every other language will print out a clearly visible warning without disrupting the workflow.

I can only see downsides and no upside in this design. Why would you slow down the development workflow for something any decent compiler will discard as basic optimization step? It's an error about something that has absolutely no impact on the resulting program and its execution, you can probably find a dozen better reasons for Zig to throw errors where it doesn't.
But if you’re going to use a framework like HTMX and the others you mentioned, why not just use React? Vanilla JS is great because it’s universally available, if you’re choosing to drop that advantage I would just go with React.
Put your state's AG's email address in the form :-)
Oh, I quite agree, there's nothing peaceful about it. But the formal state being what it is, it won't end a permanent formal state of war such as between the Koreas, or between Russia and Japan.
I think Verizon changed policy sometime in mid 2010s. And it might not have applied to iPhones because Apple is Apple, but it applied to all other phones that worked on Verizon prior to iPhone coming to Verizon.
Pregnant women often crave pickles that are not fatty. Human gut sensors are unlike mouse gut sensors.
> absolutely do decimate local bird populations

Which is why it's best to keep them indoors or perhaps have a catio so they can experience the outdoors without impacting the local wildlife. It's also better for the cats as indoor cats tend to live longer.
It's perfectly reasonable to take the position that it's deeply problematic for a language aiming for wide use in 2022 to not be memory safe. There's no requirement that you "focus on tradeoffs", especially since real people get hurt by memory safety problems.
Avian influenza detected in American dolphin
if you lump all the parts of a large domain together and then paint the entire thing with the aspects of a part, you also get garbage.

so author is doing the the same thing with reasoning that they complain about in engineering.
> however a nation can and will prohibit exports when local demand exceeds available reserves.

Sure. There is no doubt a tipping point. Seeing 100% exports wouldn't work. But the nation of the US is made up of its citizens, so only when the citizens start to feel that tipping point has nearing or has occurred will they take measures to prohibit such exports.

Clearly we're not there. There is still more upside than downside.
I Went from Feeling Like a Fraud to Making $300 in Sales in a Day
I felt like a fraud because I thought, “I’m not a good developer. I am just a designer.” It took some time to change my mindset.

I’m sure many of you can relate to feelings of self-doubt and impostor syndrome — I know I can.
But I’m proof that you don’t need to be a “proper” developer. All you need is an idea that people find useful, and the determination to see it through.
>cats would definitely survive due to their excellent hunting skills in a world without humans.

I don't know about yours, but my cats would not adjust well.
And particularly if you were on the receiving end of a bit of excessive snark you sort of ended up having to talk people down that it's just The Reg being The Reg. And, of course, if you follow that style, you will overdo it not infrequently. I could name a few people on Twitter like that.

It can be funny but it can also get in the way of serious points you want to make.
I remember an HN article about the efficiency of EVs. The numbers showed that discounting the battery efficiency, the EV had 100% efficiency. This, of course, is absurd and any engineer should "gut check" that as wrong.

I was pretty disappointed by the credulous acceptance of that nonsense on HN, and the arguments used to rationalize it.

I looked up the author, who turned out to be a ski instructor.
> ArXiv won't let authors remove their paper from the website

This is an essential feature of arXiv to maintain academic integrity and encourage serious academic submissions.

If you realize that your paper contains an error, then you can mark the paper was "withdrawn". People have limited time so if you do this no one read the paper (everyone makes mistakes sometimes).

As long as you do not make a habit of uploading and withdrawing papers, then it will not matter.
OMG not another water analogy.

I‘ve never been able to understand what the hell electricity actually is and how it works.
Could the number be valid from indexing standpoint but irrelevant search results are deemed unworthy of display to user? Unworthy + maybe costly on back-end side e.g. because infrequently accessed data is in cold storage?
There are a ton of taxes and fees that could be reduced because they're replaced by the revenue. Sales taxes and payroll taxes, for starters.
Newsletter for Understanding Healthcare
Whether you're a patient, a care provider, health administrator, social worker, or even an industry innovator, the complexities of the American healthcare system can't be understated. Each week, we go into a different part of the healthcare system to explain it for the average person.
Same here. I used type annotations before static analyzers became popular, and was quite happy with them (though I would not enforce them). They were a great source of documentation. And yes, like any documentation, occasionally they can deviate from reality.

With static analysis they won't deviate anymore. But the price you're paying for this is verbosity, complexity, and constant support of types.

I find Python static analysis incredibly unpythonic.
Help! I mo-opened movim by accident and now I can't figure out how to mo-close it!

I've tried everything! mo-Ctrl-Q, mo-Ctrl-X, mo-Alt-F4,, mo-F10 ...
Hypothetically if this has broken Russia's military's morale and this recapture of territory continues Putin will be deposed or resign. Already the propaganda seems to be breaking down since yesterday and people are angry at the failures and starting to feel it's a lost cause. He hasn't left himself a way out with his rhetoric and actions, so this will fully blow up on him. After Putin the thorny thing is Crimea, I am afraid even whoever takes over and blames all the invasion and failure on Putin may not feel free to give up Crimea without a lot more fighting.
> This is trivial from the fact that the government is not a for profit entity.

This is not so. Government could use the surplus revenues to pay off debt early, or to reduce taxes. It almost never does these things.
Quick somebody write a program to automatically rebut these types of accusations
Well, I don't consider it a _bad_ experience; I understand that my usage has contributed significantly to the problem. If Apple were to give me the runaround here, my story would likely be very different. I may have abundant patience but it is finite.

I wouldn't dare prescribe my regimen for how I deal with things beyond my control, but for interested parties I would say daily meditation and exercise have helped me turn down the volume on such things.

I do appreciate your ire, as I share it.
Thing is, if your freze something, that does not stop its internal decay due to radiation, e.g. carbon 14, kalcium etc, its just that the errors which occur arent multipled and the relatively short time is insufficient. But freeze a corpse for a millenia and it will turn into swiss cheese from self radiation, even if it was healthy when you froze it.
Ok, as I understand, because there is an annual cap on amortization, this would mean you can effectively write off more of the investment.
Plus, these plugins to achieve similar functionality: https://meta.discourse.org/t/thoughts-on-a-plugin-which-turn...
An article is as good as the data that supports the research.

We have to keep in mind that this is an article based in google search and bibliography and is just a very raw estimate. Bibliography studies mostly the worse and special cases. There is a risk into taking the worse cases as a sample of the global situation.

Is a guess, much better than having none, but still a guess. Don't overthink it
True. This can be tricky but generally:

- the copy-replace trick is harder to do if you use native copy (keyboard or mouse menu) & avoid "Copy" icons pages provide

- if it's such a long snippet that's too long to re-verify at a glance, maybe it's too long...
Agreed, but I think that author's gripe is that in the absence of a conversation the rule is that the slowest sets the pace. That the "implicit/default/unspoken" rule in today's society dictates that we stoop to the lowest common denominator otherwise we are being insensitive.

I think this is why we break into groups like marathon runners, 7-minute milers, car-to-car mountain climbers, etc. In the forming of this group is also an "implicit" social contract about what it takes to belong. The existence of these groups ensures that the lowest common denominator meets a certain criteria in order to join.

Edit: Additionally, the recent moral philosophy is that excluding people from a group is unfair. College, the C-level suites, Everest, marathon running should be accessible to everyone. I think the backlash now is that previously closed groups feel like they are forced to let people in below their standards and thus forced to sink to the lowest common denominator in society.
I am anti-boondoggle. $Billions in for nothing out is a losing proposition.

Kinetic neutrons are almost the worst energy delivery vehicle conceivable, even worse than gamma rays. (Only neutrinos would be worse.) Visible photons are good.
What if we didn't use plain old finance to solve the problem, but used smart contracts that can be traced down to the originator of the problem, then fine the entire responsible chain if there is a violation?
No. FAANG is basically an eponym at this point. The companies that make up the acronym are irrelevant and they'll change overtime but the idea doesn't.

"FAANG is an acronym for the five best-performing American tech stocks in the market"
Among the general MTV-watching audience of the 90’s, Usenet was very obscure.
Just like Canada did. By redistributing the tax revenue. Look up Carbon fee with dividends.
We know for a fact that social media causes these issues, thanks to the leaking of internal Facebook documents to the WSJ[1]. Whether or not it's the only source of the rise of mental illness isn't clear, but it's a huge factor for sure.

[1] https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-facebook-files-11631713039
yeah I did not watch that, I am wrong. Seems pretty lame for a supposedly emergency service.
I usually just use terraform to deploy to AWS with some additional scripts to rsync files from the CI/CD pipeline.

At this point I just have a template to do it and reuse it in my various projects.

If I don't need a server, I usually just use the Serverless framework.
Not sure which lens you are using for coming to this conclusion. In my experience, most people writing Rust code have no "moral superiority" and treat Rust as a "better tool", not as a religion per se.

However, what I've seen in the discourse of several programmers that claim to prefer Zig is the assumption that Rust is "not really that big of a deal". There's a constant minimization of the advancements both the ownership system and the safety approach provide, and a lack of recognition for the fact that the language is a "game changer" in the industry.

Overall, this looks a lot like rationalization of an emotional choice, which for me is much more close to religious zealotry.
My educated guess would be that the gato presents them with these offerings.
Try RMSbolt.

Not really compatible with Windows though.
"Responsibility" is semantically a bit nebulous, but seems to me much more related to "liability" than "continuous improvement". The question "Who is responsible?" reads a lot more like "Who is liable?" than "How did this bad thing happen?". If you release a new product, you may be accountable to your org for how it performs, but (IMO) you're not morally responsible for the actions of others using it. If your new product is a choking hazard you're not guilty of manslaughter.

"morally responsible" ~= "guilty"
> (you can leave those underscores in and clear them out before release)

You can leave those "unused variable" warnings and fix them before release

The difference is that warnings are visible, the underscores however suppressed the compiler's ability to help you.
My first contact with C was RatC, via "A book on C", with its implementation as appendix.

https://books.google.com/books/about/A_Book_on_C.html?id=e5p...

So it is kind of ironic this revisionism how great was C "portability", when in reality it was full of dialects outside UNIX just like the competition.
Sure you can. The ability to establish a noncompetitive monopoly via paying billions of dollars to maintain a market position that allows them to make those payments and still make billions of dollars of profit is perfectly compatible with and even evidence for a monopoly. DDG isn't going to be able to write those checks.

Though perhaps simply banning these types of exclusivity deals would be sufficient to return to a competitive market. It seems lighter touch than breaking up Google.
I have seen cats catch rabbits as big as themselves.
Yes, had this happen with Microsoft for 30+ days, Facebook for 2 months, Google, and my PlayStation Network account.

Too many digital eggs in one digital basket. Losing access to stuff because some algorithm flags you for using a VPN is fucking stupidity.
One other aspect is also soap. Many people say it damages the microbiome in your skin
A guy was interviewing with an autonomous mobility team about a year ago and he said something to the effect of "just train it with machine learning." That decades of research into planning algorithms based on mathematics and theory from top universities might have been done for a reason escaped him. The team joked about this for months afterward.
This should help: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wlw9U2k70o&ab_channel=Redst...
Everyone uses transport. Theoretically if you owned your own land and lived like a stone age person, making everything from scratch, using nothing in a modern economy then I guess yes the argument could be made you shouldn’t pay as much, but it’s such an unlikely situation it’s not worth legislating for. Actually even then, you need to be defended by your State from people who would take your land by force. So everyone uses transport whether they realize it or not.
Who should be the 'Artist of Record' when producing Generative AI artwork?
Dabbsy's gone, unfortunately. Not sure what went on there, but I suspect he wasn't "serious" enough. He's still at Autosave is for Wimps though:

https://autosaveisforwimps.substack.com
Is there a plan to allow Vue (and other frameworks) on Fresh? I'm also looking at Prisma+Deno issue for my dream stack.
Go to accessibility settings and enable increased contrast.
To be fair I think modern versions of your favorite shell warn you when trying to run it, asking for confirmation even with the -f.

(For that one guy: it deletes every file on your computer)
Which exposes you to greater complexity in combating abuse, and greater difficulty in discovery.

I agree entirely, and I really like the fine-grained "part P2P part federated" stuff that's growing more and more popular, but it's not a zero-cost thing to do. And it's not just a "oh, well, the code's a bit more complex" cost, the user experience will be unavoidably more complex as number of hosts increases, as they now need to select one in order to enter the ecosystem... but they're outsiders, how do they make an informed choice?
> Its all still horse shit, but if you want to tear down the American CEO institution you have to understand their first and primary argument is that they can still do things others can't, because they're (reportedly) in those smoke filled room where "big deals get done".

Sure—and I'm serious that I'm open to the possibility that something actually did change about the business landscape for non-shitty (i.e. not corruption or principal-agent-problem) reasons such that it's in fact true that there's a big advantage to hiring from the small pool of acceptable CEO candidates that justifies giving them entire train cars full of cash, but it does seem to me like we didn't used to operate that way and things were... basically fine. Not that there weren't huge advantages to being in the "right" set, or whatever, as there has been in any time and place, but that it seems like for the specific case of CEOs it used to be more acceptable to train up existing employees, who didn't start their employment with the company somewhere in the top-exec echelon, into those kinds of roles, which behavior seems like it would act as a pretty effective relief valve on CEO comp getting out of control.

What's going on now sure looks like what would happen if the people in charge of hiring for these roles had a strong interest in keeping the compensation extremely high. But it's still possible there's something else going on, and there are good, non-corrupt motivations at work.
dont forget excess deaths.
Give all of the proceeds from the tax back to the people. Effectively, instead of all carbon-emitters paying the government, make it so that high-carbon-emitting people have to pay the low-carbon-emitting people.
All things have to evolve and move with the times.

This makes sense. Somewhere I have an old hacker t-shirt that says Evolve or die that supports the mantra.

If I could make one feature request of ElReg it would be that the system used by your editors puts a hard cap on article descriptions to 80 characters so I do not have to do creative editorializing of the links when I submit them here. At times I find it very difficult to submit a link and have it still make sense.
Agreed. We just need to tax carbon or the externality of emissions more. It doesn't make sense for companies to figure out climate/energy science out on their own anyways. Its completely silly to expect that every mid-size company figure this out on their own and voluntary pay more than their competitors and lose any pricing edge.
I'd like to start out with a "well duh". Specialised hardware is going to be better than lesser-specialised hardware. A transation-ASIC will probably shred the Power10.

POWER is specialised for record-based operations, and is specialised for traditional mainframe workloads. Granted, most of those specialisms are best used in a mainframe context, but even all stand-alone cores in a workstation they still retain most of that benefit, purely based on instructions it supports.
The vast majority of that is just personal perception, and has nothing intrinsic to do with an analog technology.

For example; maybe for me the perfection of digital reproduction is actually MORE haunting than an "alive" 35mm version.
I've created strawberry graphql, it uses type hints to generate GraphQL schemas
VMware: ESXi VM Performance Tanks Up to 70% Due to Intel Retbleed Mitigation
It would be great if someone could turn this into an online simulation.
hush now, that's supposed to be a secret they only learn once they start working outside of node.
Yep, the blogspam only adds to the complexity because you can not be certain of an author's level of knowledge until you become an old sailor yourself.

This command is a Makefile rule for building .o out of .c source files. It is var-heavy, but results in something like:

gcc -c -std=c99 -Wall -I/path/to/headers -o file.o file.c

I have no idea what my usual webpack config results into and how to debug that mess.
> No plan to come back != a promise to never force employees back to the office

That doesn't apply solely to Amazon, or even the rest of FAANG. _Any_ company, even those currently remote-first or remote-only, are just one CEO change away from an open-plan office.
Indeed, basically the entire built environment is one giant fossil fuel subsidy. Almost all construction in the past ~200 years, certainly since WW2, has been malinvestment based on artificially cheap fossil energy.

Really, you can say that the industrial revolution is defined by energy getting exponentially and artificially cheaper as we got better at digging up burnable stuff, burning it, and using the resulting energy to do stuff, including digging up more burnable stuff even faster.
Carbon is definitely a problem.
If you know assembly, Pascal took away a lot and gave little in return, and it was verbose. I worked on a 80x25 monitor so the verbosity was annoying. Only functions could return values, but they were not guaranteed to be pure. No early returns.

I also remember there were library functions with variable # of elements, but you could not write them (variable arg functions) yourself. Really hated that.

Not all of these were fair criticisms, but they were enough to switch for me.
It's a mistake to ignore the word 'probably' in that sentence. It's a rule but not a 100% rule. There are occasional exceptions.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4922426
>you're basically expected to go through the backlog to hunt for things to do

No, you're expected to feel a sense of ownership over and identification with the system, and to have a fairly deep personal sense of itches that need scratching and ideas worth exploring. Some of those ideas may originate from other people, but if you need other people or an issue tracker to tell you what the backlog is, you're not really right for that kind of role.