skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Presumably AT&T was attempting to sell their stock before the new model released. It was only applicable if buying a 13.
I’m fairly certain that only refers to the Suggestions category and the order into which app icons are displayed. Categories are fixed and depend of how the app is tagged. I was specifically mentioning the list view however. I don’t use the grouping.
For entirely different reasons though.
Interestingly, the authenticity and legitimacy of UFO disclosures has been ramping up recently, right as we come closer to the cusp of fusion, AI and quantum computing breakthroughs. We’ve gone from stories in pulp magazines to reports in NYT and the Congress.

Interesting times ahead
I have different reading lists on hacker news, twitter, reddit and medium and because of this I never read anything that I don’t read directly… If you need to share between them you need some convenient app for your phone and computer.
There’s something to be said for convenience that worries me a bit with this. The amount of people that may be “misusing” this feature and the strain that it’s going to put on,say, mountain rescue. If people start feeling more confident than their capabilities, or they ignore weather reports just because they can be rescued with an iPhone, I don’t know what effect that’ll have on these resources.
How big of a problem is this in the states? In Europe, nobody I know, and I really mean I don’t know one single person that uses SMS or SMS-like apps like iMessage. If I open my messages app, I only have there my 2FA messages.

It’s either WhatsApp or Signal
I interpret 1lint's comment as saying the parents brought the kids out of the hellhole, so the kids should be thankful.
I kind of think of it as "free" in the way a ball falling from a height doesn't require any fuel to locomote.

Yes, you put energy into the throw. But if you count the guy hauling a hang-glider up a hill (or in other words it's potential energy at the top), I wouldn't think of hang-gliders as energy efficient at all. So either way I'm having trouble reconciling the comparison. Either they're infinitely efficient (zero input energy) or not comparably efficient.

Maybe they're counting the twitches / muscle movements and such of steering the apparatus while in flight?
I am concerned with having a place to live, as distinct from preserving my current home.

If I ever have to leave my doomed home with only what I can carry, I'd rather owe as much as possible at that point in time. I think that debt owed to human beings is strictly better than the same amount of equity just vaporized with no possible recourse.
To be fair, they said "simple", not "easy".
Dynamic Island on iPhone 14 Pro – Apple
How is your relationship with your father?
Gwynne absolutely is the unsung hero. (Though in truth I think more spacex fans know about her importance than it would seem. Not sure about the outside world.)
What if the alien civilization is so advanced that a jump across the cosmos takes about as much effort as driving a couple of miles down to the mall for us?
Except, it cannot.

No new nuke design begun today could produce any power before 2035. The money spent building it, spent on renewables instead, would produce immediately, displace CO2 immediately, and produce more.
Cheers for the feedback, deploying fixes now!

Regarding the pricing, it uses Stable Diffusion API which costs $0.02 per image. So I have to charge something to not go bankrupt hehe.
Yeah but that's basically what a peleton is but without the bikes being physically connected.
Why the obsession with the joker in every example page?
Considering tor is run by the feds, I would think everything is going according to plan.
Yeah it’s useful to have gravity on your side if your steam is liquid.
Not really. A common spiel of the time was that having to mount / and /usr due to packager laziness started requiring it b handled in initramfs making it more complex. Previously / was supposed to be able to boot into minimal standalone system that could mount the rest of itself.

So the common argument was that one should accept that readonly separate /usr and snapshots and whatsoever you wanted weren't going to be a thing because fedora didn't want to maintain support for mounting /usr in initramfs.
Earliest evidence of a surgical amputation in 31,000-year-old grave in Borneo
These are all great opinions that are countered soundly by the article I linked. Do you have articles you suggest I read?

> And RISC is the way to go, because we've known for some 40+ years that CISC is bad.

Quantify 'bad'. Again these are all opinions.

Nobody will argue with you x86 is terrible. What I'm saying, backed by the article I linked, is that the fact the x86 ISA is terrible really doesn't hold it back. And once you start optimizing a RISC architecture, over time, for performance, it quickly approaches the same thing.

> Not really. Fusion is mostly academic, rather than an industry standard. E.g. no RISC-V processor in the market does fusion[0].

It doesn't depend on fusion but since 2016 it's pretty clear it'll be an optimization. A big one! Which means that complexity is coming whether or not any market cores implement it today or not, which is part of the argument I'm making haha. Once you take the path of these optimizations, the cores start to look pretty familiar. Read the reply to the comment you linked.

Nobody is going to leave performance on the table to satisfy some niche opinions on complexity being bad.

> But, for anyone actually designing systems, it does matter.

What is "actually designing systems" today? There's complexity in everything (especially anything performant) and frankly, that complexity is abstracted effectively by compilers and operating systems.

> In the present hyper-networked world, this is unacceptable. In IoT, using x86 should be criminal negligence, and we will no doubt see it actually recognized as such in the courts at some point in the not-so-distant future.

Citation needed?

> x86 had a good run. It's already well past the time to move on, leave it in the past where it belongs.

Fine, but not relevant to CISC vs RISC.
Does it have to be new? Buy a used 7-8 gen+ intel laptop from your own country, i.e. used office stock from US and Europe is regularly available around the world. For around 300$ bucks you can get something very usable.
Did you just divide the cost of a storage system by the amount it stores and then compared that to the cost of a kWh of electricity off the grid?
Is saying “no comment” really a better standard?

Also, a few hundred billion in the bank might alter ones response.
> This is because you have full control over your computer. You can decide what to do with it

"A little knowledge does much harm" as the saying goes.

You can decide what to do with it including screw up your security. End users, especially power users make the most risky decisions because of over confidence. How do you know I am not accidentally exposing NFS unsecured to the internet or exposing my pc to the internet but forgetting I have elastic search listening in all IPs, install random packages without checking and haven't updated my browser this year? Maybe I do everything right but don't have off-device backups, availability is also a security property.

I am not saying the cloud is better, I am saying the cloud is better depending on the threats you reasonably anticipate. Let's take emails as a common example, everyone and their mother use the cloud (that's where webmail lives), you trust your email provider be it gmail, proton or aol.com to not only access your private information but more or less take over most accounts and do a lot of serious damage to your life. Now if you trust google with gmail, why would you not trust them with gcp? Again, I am not pro-cloud, I am just laying out the concept of having a threat model.

Can you reasonably expect some threat actor to target or opportunistically compromise a security property you value with respect to spcific information? Is it more cost prohibitive for that threat actor to acheive their goals in a cloud VM or on your laptop?

Let's say your threat actor is someone you live with or someone that could harm you physically, that is different than someone doing a perimeter attack which is also different than someone targeting you with exploits and social engineering lures without even bringing up their specific capabilities.

In general, if you are hiding from the government of the cloud provider or you have reason to distrust the employees of the cloud provider (be it intent or competence) your PC might indeed be more secure. But realistically and objectively, a cloud provider will have better security both from defaults and monitoring perspective.

I use to share OPs sentiment but I repeated the terms "reasonably" and "reason" because the more I learned the more I realized how suspicion,intuition and hypotheticals are not enough to measure risk. You need a a vulnerabilty and exposure and you need motives and incentives for humans that will gain from exploiting them.

Yes, the NSA can hack my ec2 using a bunch of 0days but what they have to gain as a result if that is not worth burning a 0day or even the time and effort of a paid human. Even for bored kids showing off it isn't valuable (interesting) enough.
look for second hand thinkpads, models from x220 to x270 should fill all your needs. Screen size is 12". best you can get for 100-300$. Should come with 8gb of ram and decent CPU.
Robocalls seem to be way less of a problem in Europe than in the US, not sure how many other countries suffer from the same.
Well, I'm in my 40s, so I guess eventually you'll come around...
After working with Java for over a year professionally, I really appreciate its dependency management system(Maven or Gradle). Whereas with Python it is always a mess(Poetry looks promising though).
Take a look at Airalo if you haven't already. They have an India option which doesn't require KYC. $13 for a 30 day 3GB eSIM.
Reviewing some new Rust text editors
IBM were a mainframe company back then. Both Apple and Microsoft were already household names in the personal micro computer world before IBM entered the market.

Source: I lived through that era writing software for micro computers.
Where I live in the US, the power company is National Grid, headquartered in London. I believe that customers can select a different energy supplier, while paying National Grid for connection and delivery. So it sounds like you are talking about a similar system.

I'm not sure of the state of the market, and I've never tried changing my supplier, but I do notice the electricity supply rate has more than doubled year-over-year.

My understanding is that most of the power here comes from Canadian hydro, so that seems to tell you something about the usual explanations for price changes.
The audio quality thing is a Bluetooth limitation AFAIK. There is no standard which lets you stream high quality audio bidirectionally, their high fidelity mode has only one audio stream going to the headphones.
You think it's harder fighting one gorilla or a thousand chimpanzees?
In case of catastrophic failure, thousands of tons of radioactivated lithium hydroxide burn uncontrollably, the smoke producing drain opener in contact with mucus membranes and lungs.
Nice, but insincere in that it doesn't recognize that Steve Jobs was an abusive jerk who wouldn't recognize his own daughter. Maybe a very necessary jerk who benefited humanity tremendously by pushing people into doing wonderful things that otherwise would not have been done any time soon. And maybe he became a better human being later on in his life. Still, fiction is not the best tribute to someone about whom many great things can already be said.
I’d say an older gen Thinkpad. They’re usually the best value for your money if you’re looking for a bargain.

You can find sellers who might be willing to ship internationally on eBay. You also have to factor in taxes or levies your country may charge on electronic imports.
Those are extreme exceptions. Steve Jobs and the others you mentioned are not even in close leagues. That was my point, we try to judge everyone with the same yardstick and divide them in strict binary buckets. By that logic, Steve Jobs would either belong to same category as either Hitler or Gandhi.
If it will take off among carriers, then yes. As things stand now it's a technology that "sometimes work".
For reference, the core of the Sun is around 15M°C (cooling to ~5500°C at its surface).

Oh, and about 160M times bigger in diameter.
Some old SEO testing with the previous DALL-E AI. Removing those now.
Since they’re long dead, little is lost by labeling them evil. But the closer they are to our present time, the more we must sacrifice by declaring someone an anathema. Worst of all is living people, of course.
Within the standard library, `clojure.core/pmap` is good for simple problems[0], whereas the various functions in the clojure.core.reducers[1] namespace are a bit more sophisticated and would probably solve the sort of problem you're describing pretty well. There are also a number of good clojure parallelism libraries floating around if you don't mind incurring dependencies: I've used claypoole[2] and tesser[3] in the past and been pretty happy with them.

All of these options are, IME, relatively easy to drop in to some extant data processing pipeline to parallelize it, and probably require a similar level of finagling to what you're used to in Haskell.

[0] (->> some-lazy-seq (pmap ...) (reduce ...)) goes pretty far, but nesting/composing pmaps or doing i/o doesn't always work particularly well since the JVM [currently] uses OS threads rather than something like the lightweight threads GHC provides.

[1] https://clojure.org/reference/reducers

[2] https://github.com/clj-commons/claypoole

[3] https://github.com/aphyr/tesser
Dams are being taken down at an increasing rate as it is recognized that the fisheries they destroyed are far more valuable than anything they produce.
Central Banking 101 by Joseph Wang is the obvious choice and it's not even mentioned here...
Enabling the wider adoption of Ultra's networks
> How is your relationship with your father?

Great. And yes, I'd resent him had he traded the weekends we spent making balsa-wood gliders, filming Star Trek home videos (paper maché + sugar against a black t-shirt + handycam) and taking desert hikes for face time in the office.

But we are inarguably better off for Jobs--and countless others--having prioritised their professions over conventional needs. It simply seems a bit ruddy to footnote that sacrifice with scoffing.
> My guess is just wax and gunk getting to the external microphone mesh over time, but there is no way to deal with it

I haven't tried this myself but someone on reddit mentioned you can use blu tack (sp?) - press it on the external mics, then pull off to clean it. I imagine it works but as I said, haven't tried it personally.
There are often way more than 4 million people within 150 miles of populated cities in the States (which consequently is also a large portion of the population). For many people 2-4mbps per cell is less than 1 bps which I think is unreal.

My guess is their estimates are off and that satellite net speeds don’t correlate directly to regular network speeds because of all the other factors. If it’s actually 2-4Mbps… yikes, this would only be useful when you’re far away from populated areas (which in all reality could be their intended use case)
The rich are no different to the poor. They can't take their wealth with them.
I choose "distance to Voyager 1" as my frame of reference: according to NASA's status website I've traveled about one thousand miles since I started writing this sentence. After such an effort it's clearly time for a coffee break!
> it was bad technology

Was it really?
Fusion cannot produce cheap energy, in any case.

Fuel cost is a substantial fraction of exactly none of the generation methods in use.
And if you don't, it presumably says "you're holding it wrong!"
Flash was a kind of devious problem in the same way as IE was and Chrome is:

Those who depended on it got benefits while messing up the lives for everyone else.

To be fair to IE and its modern replacement Chrome, if you develop and test mostly on IE and Chrome you can make things cross browser if you put effort into it, something you couldn't with Flash.

Getting rid of Flash - whatever the reasons was - was a huge gift to the web and by extension people like me who develop on and for an open web.
This comment is perhaps the most accurate take on the fall of IE.

Firefox dethroned IE not because it was "MuH fReE oPeN sOuRcE sOfTwArE" or "MuH nEtScApE", it was because Firefox was superior to IE in performance and feature set. It was better than IE at being practical and enabling users to do things they needed or wanted to do.

Shortly after, Chrome rolled around and it was superior in performance (RAM hogginess aside) and feature set (for Joe Average, not necessarily power users) to Firefox and dethroned the dethroner.

Firefox will not be a dethroner again, because Firefox is not superior to Chrome. In fact, it's inferior to Chrome: It's been a third-rate Chrome ripoff for at least the last 10 years. None of the Chromium forks will dethrone Chrome either, because they are also third-rate Chrome ripoffs by their very nature.

It is conceivable that some browser superior to Chrome will eventually come out and dethrone it, but that's probably still a long ways away and I would argue the challenge of dethroning Chrome is several orders of magnitudes harder than dethroning IE ever was.
The body of the missing person had been found after 4 days of search. She still held her Phone in her hand displaying the Message: "Please update your credit card information to purchase this subscription. The free usage ended 6 days ago".
Except they do stuck - at least as the other person having to listen to their awful microphone quality.
XPG4 still exists and haunts my days as sysadmin. Gonna pop a whiskey on the day we get rid of the last Solaris machine in favor of Linux.
One Head, Two Brains
That is not true at all. Even close, why does someone always spew this stuff here? There's billions of SMS messages delivered every day in Europe - from businesses to people who don't have Facebooks WhatsApp/Messenger preinstalled.

Why is it so hard to understand that your little life bubble isn't the whole world?
No. That isn't the same.

CRLs and OCSP are about individual certificates.

The beauty of Merkle Hash Trees for validation is it permits Statements e.g.

CAx = CA2 and 156 ≤ X < 343 (5)

The statement cj indicates that the certificate with
serial number X = 156 issued by CA2 has been
revoked, while the certificates with serial numbers
from X = 157 to X = 343 (both included) issued by
CA2 have not been revoked.

From https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220066804_Certifica...
Sure it is. It's a concern that's addressed by using efficient libraries written in Rust or C.

Mostly.

One time I implemented RSA in Python. I needed it to read some legacy data with the wrong padding, something which the libraries couldn't (wouldn't) do. It performed just fine. The ternary pow() that does the heavy lifting is not quite as fast as the dedicated crypto libraries, but it was close enough.
You can enable translation on Firefox Nightly - I blogged about this (and other) extensions: https://www.quippd.com/writing/2022/01/26/most-wanted-add-on...
Yes, that is what he’s saying.

However, the kids did not ask to be brought into this life - which OP seems to describe as a hellhole overall. Why should the kids be grateful for anything after being forced into this world?
Nope, Android userspace has zero traces of UNIX, and its use of the Linux kernel is an implementation detail.
As a data point: Probably 90% of my messages are on iMessage. I have one friend group that has a telegram chat.

Almost nothing in WhatsApp or Signal.
Does require you to limit your goals: what if you want to see the far side of the moon? (Substitute goal: listen to "Dark Side of the Moon")
Right, I meant storage, not RAM. 12 is 64/128/256 GB, while 13 is 128/256/512 GB.
It also ships clients across several OSes and arches. Writing it natively and maintaining it's portability would be a snipe chase, and even then it wouldn't run on locked-down devices like the iPad. Targeting the web/Electron worked out for Microsoft, it's not like Intellij is leading the way with memory-efficient text editors or anything.
I'm honestly not sure why this was never more complained about. He ignored medical advice, that's fine I guess, his right. But he effectively stole a liver from someone and essentially wasted it. Must be nice to have FU money.
Still negligible.

Fusion and fission are bad ideas on their own merits, regardless of heat they might produce.
Correct, and nothing stops Apple from reversing that connection and sending messages to users
Conda ships Intel MKL for linear algebra, too, meaning numpy.dot (matrix multiply), scipy, fft, solvers, … run 2-10x faster. Well, used to, I think the open source alternatives have improved since.
Only using it in very remote areas that literally have no other communications available is exactly the point of the T-Mobile/Starlink service. Obviously they're not trying to outperform terrestrial cellular networks with satellite comms. So mostly the same use-case as the Apple/Globalstar service.

Except from the sounds of it the Apple service actually is something like 1bps, since they stated in the video it can take "only" 15 seconds to send one message. (assuming an emergency SOS message size of 15 bytes when compressed)
Ironically, the parent HP is the brand licensing I remember...

On this day of looking forward to new Apple products, and looking back (Steve Jobs archive on the HN front page at the moment) let us not forget one more thing:

iPod•HP
- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPod%2BHP
Yeah, seems it's back to Android phones for me. My iPhone Mini was my first and seemingly only iPhone. Don't understand why everyone needs so large phones...
The best thing about Kaiser, IMHO, is there is never a surprise out-of-network astronomical charge on the bill as I've seen with regular insurance.
1. Emailing the participants the summary without a permission to control it can be pretty damaging.
2. Were the meetings it joined set up before you disabled that feature? It is likely that they were already in the system and your off flag only kicks in for future meetings?
3. For auto-joining there is a tradeoff in the ease of use versus compliance.
4. I am the founder of Wingman - the way we handle this is
a) You have the option of not syncing your calendar and only adding meetings you want recorded manually
b) The meeting participants can request the recording - it isn't automatically emailed to anyone
c) You can choose to only record external meetings or internal + external meetings
d) For an org-wide usecase, you have the option of making all your meeting recordings private by default
I have been wanting this for years. Thank you for sharing what you found.
It was closer to 50% for me since there were two (overlaid) exchanges in my neighborhood. I still remember about a dozen phone numbers of friends from when I was growing up.
That's $44 for 15 days and 6 GB! If I recall correctly, I was paying like a dollar a gigabyte or something on a local sim. You would go to any market and there would be these guys walking around with rolls of activation codes which you could buy for like $0.10 each and they were good for 100MB or a certain number of minutes when you typed it in the phone.

This is exactly what I'm talking about: if you have this phone you will be paying exorbitant prices for connectivity all over the world.

edit: it looks like the average in Uganda is $1.56/GB and you can get data as low as $0.45/GB USD

https://techjaja.com/the-cost-of-1gb-of-data-in-uganda-vs-th...
I'm sure I have a lower opinion of him than most but come on this is just slander