skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think your definition here is Off. Both Apache 2.0 and GPL qualify both as "Open Source" and "Free Software"

Yes of course many large companies do not contribute. If your goal is to FORCE to contribute customers to your liking this is what Proprietary license is for. Go proprietary and you can discriminate customers based on their ability to pay. Open Source though requires same access - rich and poor, good and evil and especially relinquishing control for you to decide which is which
It's not limited and it's not merely "technically correct". The only thing that has been exposed here is your lack of understanding of how all this works.
California’s Water-Saving Policies Could Start a Mini Dust Bowl
I think it's better to have more people, or at least keep the current level.
Vox is literally the definition of neolib trash. I don't understand how you can call it far left. People on the left don't actually mind the label, but don't call shitlib stuff far left. The left is explicitly opposed to neoliberalism. If you wanna read something actually on the left: https://jacobin.com/
If you use Apple relay service is this still relevant?
Nothing, really. You misunderstood me.
Americans are paid a higher wage.

Dollar goes further with exchanges
Plenty of good films have been made with very small budgets. If you are shooting on a consumer DSLR or even phones then Blender is a godsend.

If you have RRR's budget you can easily waste more money explaining to the lawyers and accountants that something is free. The decisions is purly on which software is better.
Do you want to buy a Rolex if Swift wears one? Or Celine Dione or whatever your idol is.
To me, this is where direct air capture and geoengineering come into play: there's a saddle point where we (as a planet) can afford to pay to increase consumption and offset emissions above that.

Which is why globalizing a carbon market is so key. It organically (ha) funds what we want people to be researching and doing anyway!
There is nothing inhuman about my descriptions; it is in fact all too human.
Doesn't all of this notion of "winning" just dissolve when earth ceases to be habitable?

What you’re describing essentially sounds like mutually assured destruction.
For topics like this, TV tropes is great: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Flanderization
I wonder when it will include the L3 band GPS receiver ;)
There are few to no engineers who are technically competent at every technology at Meta or any other company.
I've been concerned about climate change for decades and I think it is important to point out how certain fundamentals have changed in the past 30 years. Until recently, all that individual people could do was make sacrifices.

the main things you could do to make a difference:
- give up certain foods
- not drive a car
- limit heating/air conditioning
- limit consumerism / waste

But recently, things have changed dramatically.

- giving up meat in 2022 leaves you with many delicious options. From plant-based milks in every supermarket, to vegan options at every restaurant, to lab-grown (or otherwise convincing) meat if you want it
- Solar panels on your roof and an electric car solve a lot
- Limiting consumerism and air travel remain problems

My point is this: The way we need to talk to people about personal actions related to climate has changed a LOT. Now, you CAN make a real difference by making some easy (and often even economical) choices.
Sorry, I missed that you were proposing this for a separate search page and not the main search.
You make an excellent point, but there is something about flights that's often overlooked. Night flights are actually significantly worse than day flights, because the emissions don't reflect heat from the sun but trap heat from the Earth.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2006/jun/15/theairlinein...

That said, this isn't a large enough effect to discredit your point.
It's interesting to me that implicit in your argument is that the corporation has some sort of "prime" speech right that users do not, but I understand how you could think that with regard to telling these companies they can't arbitrarily apply a speech to a user's speech (which is what adding a "misinformation" "warning" is doing) based on viewpoint.

We already have tons of laws that restrict what businesses can do, that would obviously restrict speech - like banning discrimination. The law does not, in fact, dictate what private businesses can say. It gives them a list of things they cannot say (e.g. certain races are morally superior). I don't see how that's different.

edit: bad grammar
Sure, but the impact is negligible because I’m just some guy on the internet, not a platform with billions of users and almost monopolistic control on information sharing colluding with all the other similar platforms to censor certain kinds of speech and amplify others.
I don’t know what the best solution is for dealing with these platforms, and I understand it is a complicated issue, but saying “it’s not censorship because they’re not the government” is simply disingenuous.
> Anything other than "Date" after "new" throws an exception

It's even very sensitive to white space.
Why are you even in this industry if you hate it so much?
I think it is fantastic if people create proprietary software and make it available for free to everyone with net worth of $5M or less (or any criteria) just do not call it Open Source software.
Including it on a spec sheet qualifies as making a big deal about it?
i will leave you with this https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1567290905039708160
Bollywood movies aren't really musicals. The way I would put it is that musicals are a genre, and Bollywood movies are all sorts of genres with songs interspersed. So you could literally edit out (or more practically, forward through) all the songs and fully watch the movie which is not really possible with musicals
If you make that in Manhattan, you are probably young, or live in Queens/South Brooklyn/Jersey City and you’re doing fine. You get pinched if you make just enough to live in Manhattan or trendy nearby neighborhoods, and your career requires it, but not enough to save and prepare for retirement.
Clearly it's a worse car WRT to that feature.

Besides the high price of iPhones, this metaphor doesn't go very far.
Ok, but the point still stands that it is still a good thing to have more housing supply.

No, it does not solve all the worlds problems immediately. But it helps with some of them.
Clideo.com – online video editing tools
This idealism doesn't always work in practice. The more public and popular a forum is, the more we need to weed out spam, scams, vandalism, and other kinds of malware/DoS.
I can read scientific and maths web pages with a noscript/basic (x)html browsers... sorry cannot hate them.
Cherry MX switches were indeed smoother in the older days. Not just Black, but Brown and Blue as well. Switches could get smoother as the plastic wears down, but that is not the whole story as evidenced by New-Old-Stock vintage keyboards also having smoother switches.

I think Cherry wasn't really ready for the demand when the mechanical keyboard craze began, and therefore their quality suffered for several years.
They have supposedly improved their manufacturing in more recent years, but the risk is that when you buy a new keyboard you'll still get switches from an old batch and not the new improved ones.
Mechanical switches are by no definition impossible to make bounceless.

SPDT pushbuttons with both outputs wired through a D-latch are perfectly bounceless.
Looks like median income in Silicon Valley is $126k [1] and median household income in Manhattan is $93k. I wouldn’t call $109k “pretty poor” in either local.

[1] https://siliconvalleyindicators.org/data/economy/income/pers...
[2] https://www.city-data.com/income/income-Manhattan-New-York.h...
Eh. Some solid points in there, but I feel the overall conclusion may be a little too..diffusionist.

We should absolutely keep a critical eye on pop science, check for bias and straight lies. We should absolutely be aware of the concept of Moral Panics and see our own opinions in light of that, yes.

But does that mean technology addiction is actually confined to the small realm of literal digital gambling?

Since this discussion is already chock-full of metaphors, let me make one as well: I am currently in Italy, where a good dinner is usually accompanied by a good wine. Say I am an alcoholic - would this kind of drinking I just described be the core of my addiction? No. Would it, in itself, be even negative? No. Would it be a good idea for me, the alcoholic, to refrain from all drinking, including this? Absolutely fucking yes.

Just because technology can't be called "universally bad", just because this kind of addiction is new and hard to measure (no pendant to measuring tobacco residue in the lung etc.), does not mean it does not exist.

If I may paraphrase the Wikipedia definition here, addiction is strong behavioral urge despite negative consequences.

So, maybe smartphones do not alter the literal (biological) attention span. But what about your ability to do deep, concentrated work? Mine definitely got fucked, and I can point at root causes.

So, maybe we haven't established causality between screentime and depression. But I will tell you what you can't do when your first and last interaction of the day is checking notifications: Quiet and serene self-reflection, or any other kind of self-therapy approach.

Maybe my anecdata is an outlier, but I can certainly correlate less screentime with happiness, monetary success, romantic satisfaction, sleep quality and psychological health quite clearly, down do an amount of screentime way below what's considered average.

/rant

This was longer than expected, maybe my point is just: Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
To balance different rights itself requires freedom of speech.
When UX design is about how to decrease usability least with the new design instead of increasing usability, something has seriously gone wrong.
Ethereum Mainnet Merge Viewing Party
Correct.

So what’s your answer?
That's true. I think people should put the idea in the back of their mind and consider it, that's all I'm saying. There are times when negation is occurring with someone that does not care at all what you are saying. And it will be seen by a pattern of behavior and action over time, after plenty of opportunity to show they don't want to be convinced.
>If Putin starts sending unprepared and unwilling citizens to die for him, it won't be the tides returning, it will be a mutinous army returning to carry out a military coup.

Might happen or might not. Never underestimate the subservient mindset of Russians towards their despots and their crab-bucket mentality regarding Ukrainians.

Hypothetical scenario: Putin generously offering peace and immediate withdrawal under the condition of Ukraine ceding the territories of DNR, LPR and Crimea effectively forever. Ukraine, currently being on a roll with the offensive, rejects the "offer" and tries to re-capture the territory in the East. Russia then starts constant long-range attacks from Russian territory. Will Ukraine take the bait and go on the offense and incurse into Russia, giving Russia an actual casus belli for general mobilization?

I'm not saying that it's certain that Russia would win the war, even under general mobilization, looking at the current conduct and material state of the RuAF (Russian Armed Forces). But they could still generate a massive nationalistic sentiment of retaliation and create a gigantic slaughter and scorched earth, making an Ukrainian victory very costly and pyrrhic.
I don't know exactly but it seems to interpret GMS being part of the ROM but not installed as it being mid-upgrade IIRC.
Yeah because it's so technically easy to build a reliable global scale information architecture allowing thousands of people to reliably iterate on, test and deploy software simultaneously while it's continuously being accessed by billions of people and which is running on devices, operating systems, and programming languages you also created to make all of this possible.
It's not free though, you have to either raise taxes or increase debt, both of those options have some unpleasant consequences.
Just because they have the right to do it doesn't make it right.
Chrome and Safari both have open source JS engines…
It is more than a timestamp.

What you have proposed is technically infeasible to implement if you want to preserve properties of blockchain. It would be no different than a bank because KYC will add inherent centralization and fragmentation in the entire system.

So we need a compromise here because either way you cannot retroactively enforce KYC approved wallet to participate on-chain. If you do, it will be optional in that case the solution implemented by tornado is decent and does not require giving data to brokers who often sell it without permission.

Government can directly subpoena data from individuals when investigating them.

Any crypto to fiat ramp is already KYCed and businesses dealing with payments require KYC beyond a certain value transaction so in practice, the impact of KYC at on-boarding will be negligible. Not to mention, KYC can be easily faked by actors with significant stake in a globalised system.

Furthermore, the data does not support that money laundering is a bigger problem as percentage of transactions in crypto than traditional finance. The AML laws have been largely ineffective in practice in traditional finance with huge cost of compliance and degradation in experience for consumers & businesses.

So we need to think of a better solution to discourage money laundering than mass surveillance.
Ask HN: Will Russia start nuclear war?
Russia is suffering a humiliating defeats in Ukraine not seen since WW2. Will their leadership resort to use of nuclear weapons?

We're moving to Berlin (from CA) next spring (my wife got an internal transfer there), but the way things are, I am a bit antsy.

Sorry about the throwaway account. My wives teammates nor our friends or neighbours here aren't aware of our plans yet.
> Your entire comment is a “so what?”

Yes. Because it's a fantasy movie. Reading complex political messaging into it is rather silly.

> Your entire comment is a “so what?”

I don't think excluding Gandhi and Nehru from a cheesy dance number is the end of the world.

> never denouncing their views

Again, read what the man had to say about the Nazis after he left Germany. Also read about what Gandhi had to say about Bose and what Bose had to say about Gandhi. We've had an international airport named after him for decades. Bose is not even remotely controversial in India.

> the movie had a clear political agenda to it.

But somehow that wasn't clear to overwhelming majority of the audience who actually saw it.
I am (author of the article) "shaming" (your words) not for trying to build sustainable but trying to have a cake and eat it too.

If maintainer believes the hard choice of Open Source is not for them it is fine. Go ahead write proprietary software instead

Being Buddhist Monk is hard too but you perhaps would find it silly someone wanting to call himself one but not wanting to follow the rules which come with definition ?
There are lots of such people on social media, if you know where to look. The trick is that none of them are directly calling for arrest for what people say. Instead they masquerade that under an accusation that attacks your person, e.g. they accuse you of harassment, of spreading propaganda, or of some crime. With the goal of silencing your views — all without ever engaging with the arguments that you provide. This is especially noticeable if you look at topics that are non-mainstream-acceptable.
The point is that you were saying you’re not getting a share of the profits, my point is that the profits are being shared in the form of additional employees.

If profits increased and employees stayed the same then you’d have a point.
Great point, Android's swipe-able keyboard was VERY good before Apple copied it. Brag about that because it was good, not "just because."
I'm likely going to get flamed for this but its just an opinion...

These types of articles always imply there is a smokey back room of fat cats that are plotting to screw over their employees.

Aren't we driving this behavior by flocking to stocks that are unreasonably profitable? A lot of us here probably have at least some market investment that we want to see go through the roof and the most likely way for these companies to pull that off is to keep their expenses in check.
I believe this would be compelled speech.

Now, depending on the project and code change in question - the US govt could 1) fork and make the change themselves and 2) potentially make certain uses of the unchanged code illegal (again, in a situation where there is actual illegality. Like piracy).
“Deep Learning for Coders with Fastai and PyTorch: AI Applications Without a PhD” will allow you to design and implement deep learning models with only good programming skill. Basic maths, no algorithms, no proofs. Howard’s paper on ULMFiT was state of the art 5 years ago, and it was originally just a part of this book. My claim is that this will be considered a classic in due time. It turns deep learning from an academic discipline into programming problems.
Well, eye opening was the C++ source code I was able to work with at a previous company, they were an automotive HMI developer company. They had really strict and well planned code structure that just hit a chord with me.

Can't provide source though on that one, as it's a propietary engine.
Recently I've enjoyed reading the source code to Sokol, lot's of really good decisions there and I love the minimal C -style structure:

https://github.com/floooh/sokol
Agreed, except I'd like to see iron batteries small enough and efficient enough to replace lithium ion in vehicles but until then, I would like to see Hydrogen/Stirling Engine hybrid vehicles and iron batteries for power plants to reduce their on cycle time.
They actually mentioned it during the presentation.
You are my new best friend. Cannot wait to see these!
Are you responding to the article or just the title? The article makes these same points toward the beginning.
It interesting how Apple has been able to stay ahead while often being a step or two behind from a technological standpoint (in some areas at least). I think it goes to show how important it is to have things work in a very seamless way.
For others who are not into that lingo, RTK/PPK are Real-Time and Post-Processed Kinematics. I had an idea of what the word kinematics means (Wikipedia says "describes the motion of [(groups of)] points") so this sounds like you use the accelerometer and gyroscope in addition to GNSS to get better accuracy, but actually no this has nothing to do with measuring your motion. Instead, RTK is something about signals' phase and requires an additional ground station (sounds similar to differential GPS, but by looking at phase data rather than position offset?), and PPK is never mentioned on Wikipedia and I don't understand descriptions from other sources. Post-processing is mentioned in differential GPS, however, to make the difference between the two topics (DGPS, RTK/PPK) even more confusing.

If you could elaborate, I'd be interested. It seems very specialistic (though you drop it as if it should be obvious) so I doubt most people here know the terms.
Apple has supported GNSS since the iPhone 8/X generation in 2017. This is about L5 GPS which I'm not sure how well this is supported in general ATM as its pretty new
Gun, ammunition purchases by credit card will be coded
Flyover Country Revolution. Flyover no more. Charge toll for overflying it. Why shouldn't private jets pay you up directly?
> We believe privacy is a right. We won't sell your data, ever.

There’s no reason to believe this. This is the same company that publicly stated their principled position relating to the culture of free speech and then flip-flopped not even 3 days later.

It’s not about that issue but rather that this company has lost credibility and should not be trusted with any promises. Keep at arms length.
TCP/IP Illustrated was my bible when I worked at ICSA Labs.
1. Try a Leopold FC660C keyboard before getting too far down this rabbit hole, and confirmation bias gets in the way of seeing that Topre switches are nicer than any mechanical switch.

2. Then install a Hasu FC660C Controller, and start customizing the firmware. Typing, like sex, is far more about software than hardware.

3. Now prepare yourself for the split/ergo keyboard advocates. They have a point if your hands move. If you rearrange your layout so pretty much anything is nearly home row, but a tap-hold one-finger-each-hand chord, your hands don't move.

Typing is bimodal. Sometimes you're in the saddle, hard at work. Sometimes you're reaching in to find "pause" with a glass of wine in the other hand. A conventional keyboard is handy for reaching in, even if it's secretly a chording keyboard along home row.
Just consider that anyone who cares deeply about this problem must organize with like minded people and wield power against the holdouts. Even if what you stated above sounds like "insanity", the only question is...will it exist?

Will there be those that pursue power and self interest in opposition to long term policy of "less" and "weakness", even if we all were to agree that long term it's mutually assured destruction (I'm not saying I agree with that though..). Then what?
While at Grad school, before taking a course on Systems programming, I spent a few days reading through Redis source code. It felt almost like poetry.. I haven’t had that level of motivation or time to read open source code like that again.. so there may be better examples.. but this was my best…
Because you posted a link to an article that claimed otherwise and commended a comment that got it wrong.
Yep, it's been days since 0days were exploited by malware in OSX. I still keep using it for some reason. Wish it would work with Android the way my linux boxes do! Even Win11 has some crapware that links it to my phone, sigh.
If you want to control which companies can use your project free of charge and which do not there is already choice for that - this choice just is not called Open Source.
I don't know if it is the most elegant, or concise, or l33t, but I am in love with Polly https://github.com/App-vNext/Polly
That was a sort of passive aggressive way of dismissing the parent comment as the enemy.
NASA Planetary Defense Coordination Office
Discovery and Imagination in Data Visualization and 3D Cartography
I think so too. IIRC, you'd have to add a new feed for each thread.
Yes that's the paragraph I was referring to, and seems to be the only one that's relevant to what you're saying.

No one knows what the state standards are? They're all listed right here on their website[1]. Do you think your hypothetical conversation qualifies as "classroom instruction"? I don't think so.

[1] http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Displ...
This, and Ask A Foolish Question by Robert Sheckley [1] are my all-time favourite Sci-Fi works

[1] https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/33854
This is why algorithm control must be handed over to the users by providing them ways to set and customize the algorithm.
Nix source code is also a pleasure to read through. I was surprised that c++ could be so beautiful and well written.
Many shows seem to fall into this. Silicon Valley is another example where it happened to almost all characters except erlich and jian yang who were already extreme caricatures
"led to believe.."

By whom? And, all of them? How about on the level of nation-states where the true power lies. As national policy, entire nations/empires will be "convinced" as status symbol? No one will see the power on the table that everyone else has left?
Burger King Whopper Index