skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Maybe start with https://lispcookbook.github.io/cl-cookbook/emacs-ide.html The 'magic' though isn't really that emacs dependent; if you like vim (like I do) you can use vim and still get that amazing experience. https://lispcookbook.github.io/cl-cookbook/editor-support.ht... has some details on alternatives. Anyway, the magic or synergy is really a combination of: CL itself being designed to support interactive development, a little server you embed (typically automatically if starting from an editor) in a running CL program called Swank, and a standard set of commands to talk to that server (and the underlying Lisp) and interface with your editor called SLIME (https://slime.common-lisp.dev/doc/html/).

The basics of the commands do things like send code over for compilation and redefining things, running things, responding to errors, debugging things, jumping to definition locations.. things you'd normally expect an IDE to do, except because of CL itself so much of that is part of the language and not a separate IDE. Some more editor-specific things come into play that some people really love, and while they may be best done in emacs they're not unique to emacs either. (Example: suppose you messed up the order of your arguments to a function, so it's written like (my-func (list something) some-other-arg) -- editors have support to swap those two arguments in one go, rather than having to backspace and retype or whatever. I personally don't find such features that magical, and are table-stakes even for things like Eclipse editing Java. Meanwhile even emacs is still weak for some things like large-scale automated semantics-aware refactoring...)

I'm fond of this short 5-part blog series https://malisper.me/debugging-lisp-part-1-recompilation/ (has some emacs gifs) that shows some of these features. But notably again, the experience isn't limited to emacs.
These implementations survived the AI Winter, despite their high prices.

A lot of the cheaper commercial implementations did not survive or did not thrive: Corman Lisp (now open source, but not used much), Golden Common Lisp, Exper Common Lisp, Procycon Common Lisp (got bought by Franz), MuLisp, Macintosh Common Lisp, ...
Vespa seemed like a total mess compared to Milvus when I picked them up
I think Goodhart's Law will kick in pretty quickly
4chan's experienced this kind of attack back in 2003, the year it was found. Users from another website contacted its host over it's hosting of lolicon. moot diplomatically resolved the issue and 4chan has more-or-less been up since. The lindy effect dictates that, having experienced these kinds of shocks along the way, 4chan will be up for another 15 years.
> Celsius is better for cooking

As far as I'm aware, there's no winner for cooking. I've never seen a recipe that required temperature more than as a value that could be provided in any units as long as you have equipment in those units (i.e. I'm not doing math with them). Putting "400°F" or "200°C" or "475 K" or some arbitrary "oven level 5" into my oven shouldn't really change how it comes out.

On the stovetop, I've never had an instruction with a temperature attached besides "interior temperature must reach X" or keeping something at a near-boiling temperature, which I've never needed a thermometer for, and 90% of the time I'm improvising without caring what the temperature is outside of "hot enough to cook the way I want but not too hot".

Sous-vide? It needs the temperature within a tight range, but the scale attached to the numbers doesn't matter as long as it's the one my thermometer uses. Double boiler? Doesn't even need you to use a thermometer to keep the temperature right. Give me a kitchen with everything in unpronouncible alien temperature units and I'd do just fine.
> when it directly incites imminent criminal activity or consists of specific threats of violence targeted against a person or group

Aren't these already crimes? Isn't the "hate crime" charge just a way to enhance the sentencing for someone thus convicted? And isn't the original charge required for this enhancement? Thus, mere "hate speech" in and of itself cannot be a crime?

> Kiwi Farms absolutely incited imminent criminal activity

According to you and some twitter threads. I'm not comfortable accepting this prima facie, though.

> This is a false equivalence.

Does Section 230 not apply to Kiwi Farms? Is Kiwi Farms actually guilty of crimes here, or is it specific forum users? If so, why are there no efforts to go after the users but just go directly to banning the entire site?
That satisfying tearing of the perforated tractor feed edges. And the not so satisyfing tear when you tried to do too many at once because you were in a hurry.

Wide format tractor fed music paper in green.

I had tractor fed graph paper for a while. If you want to know frustration, try lining up your DnD game maps to that...

And I had forgotten about the perforation skip/misalignment. Thanks for bringing that back. Triggered.
Yes, but a lot of that heat comes "for free" from cooking, your fridge/computer/apliances, hot water usage, body heat, etc.

I have a heat pump for heating and cooling, and my electric bills are only slightly higher in winter (5-10%).
Yep, dug into this the other day and POC'd it to prove that (even without prctl, just direct writing) you can overwrite those values and that will be shown in proc.
Chia is missing from this list.
if you think the fault lies with the website and the posters won't just use some other website (plenty of death threats on twitter are still up)... you are sorely uninformed.
proximity in a 2D image has neighbors in north-south-east-west (NSEW) on a 2D grid, not just pixel neighbors per-scanline (row of bytes); proximity in a sound file has harmonics and transitions of some plural set of signal, but the sound file neighbors are roughly at a point in time. corrections welcome
That’s extreme and I think most of your point comes from a belief in being vegan as an ethical way of life rather than from a genuine willingness to limit people environmental impact.

The proper way to frame it provided someone has no desire to be vegetarian would be limit your consumption of meat - only eat red meat as an exceptional treat and favour poultry a few times a week - and switch to plant based milk.

Eggs and honey are very much fine as is cheese given the average per individual amount eaten per year.
Nobody has this kind of power, you can easily switch to another provider. If literally nobody wants to work with you, then ...

>Whereas if you cede the right to do a thing

Perhaps we shouldn't be hurrying to get rid of freedom of association.
Depends on where you live. No landlord is going to fall over themselves for anything in SF (or other desirable areas) for a long time.
Lately I've been using ImHex a lot [1], it's a modular hex editor that has schema files for different file formats which comes in handy when you work a lot on reverse engineering memdumps from firmware flash files.

It also has fuzzy finding features of known file format headers, so it can also be used to recover things from dd images, though it can be laggy sometimes when walking through a couple GBs of data.

[1] https://github.com/WerWolv/ImHex
These kind of articles usually have a summary buried in them, this might be it:

> "Lab-grown meat, dense cities, and nuclear energy need a rebrand. These need to be some of the new emblems of a sustainable path forward."

1) Lab-grown meat is nowhere near commercialization. At best we have plant-based meat substitutes that have similar nutritional profiles (high protein) to meat that can be produced at scale.

2) Dense cities don't really matter that much, as each human requires a similar amount of arable land to grow the food they need each year. That per-human land area might be a bit less for vegetarians, but I doubt it's that big of a factor.

3) Nuclear energy is still quite expensive relative to wind/solar/storage, and that won't change because nuclear's catastrophic failure potential requires over-engineering and high-security, plus the uranium ore and cooling water requirements can be problematic.
>How is 4chan worse?

/pol/ is far worse from a "hate speech" perspective, but not as nearly as bad when it comes to serial harassment.

From a "people are in imminent danger" perspective I don't see how 4chan isn't worse. Remember "Some of you guys are alright, don't come to school tomorrow" from a few years back? Is there an equivalent to that on KF that I'm not aware of? The people there have given up on life in a completely different way than edgy board 4chan users.
I mean, this is a site with a body count. How many people do you think hid themselves from the public, or guarded what they said online or had to be suspicious of mundane interactions for fear of being targeted? Why is their freedom of speech less important than Kiwi Farms’?

As for looking at the evidence: all I can say is that I’ve glanced through Kiwi Farms a couple of times over the years when people spoke up about being targeted by them, and it is abundantly clear to even a casual observer that this was a community built with the intention of stalking and intimidating people.
> I jumped to the conclusion that the yum update was just too slow and I needed to speed it up.

That is not premature optimisation. That's called plain old jumping to conclusions. Next.
The cheesecake factory has no meaningful ideological motivations, unless you include the advancement of poor dieting amongst Americans, which I suppose could be considered to be anti-american in a sense.

Additionally, it's a retail store. I can't imagine they would lose a lot of business if their website was down. Still, they could just as easily fall victim to a DDoS racketeering scheme I suppose.

If somehow someone objected to cheesecake factory's practices (let's say they're a vegan or they disapproved of cheesecake factory's health practices or something), then it would be disproportionately easy for the cheesecake factory to conduct a DDoS attack on the protester's website than vice-versa. So the idea that we should support DDoS as some form of free speech is obviously pro-corporatist in my perspective, because it empowers those with more financial and bureaucratic control over the internet.
I’m continually surprised that Facebook, Twitter, and the rest dont simply create a web interface for law enforcement that allows them to delete (or more likely make invisible) content they want to censor. Noting in place of the post or tweet or whatever “law enforcement in your jurisdiction has deemed this post illegal and have hidden it for your safety”.

There’s a culture war afoot, the government wants to insert itself between the warring parties, there’s no need for executives to place their (their shareholders) company in the way. “Let the dog see the rabbit” as they say. Just harvest the energy in the system and monetise it, if that’s your mission.
I've only ever used .WAV and .MP3 formats. What would a .FLAC file format be used for?
This argument can't persuade those who never have any views of their own and always adopt the currently acceptable ones.
Wrong, Reddit explicitly allows hate speech against white people because it follows the nouveau definition of "racism" not including whites. There's a Reddit admin response to repeated requests to ban /r/FragileWhiteRedditor somewhere that outlines this.

> KiwiFarms does encourage everything that happens on it

Wrong. The admin, Null, has explicitly said they don't allow doxxing or swatting and complies with law enforcement

> If you're going to take a strawman this far, blame the cellphone and camera manufacturers involved in those live streams. As well as the landlord who owned the building it happened in. And any restaurants that serve them, can't murder if you don't eat.

That's cute but what you're describing as absurd is basically what Keffals et al are doing with this website by hounding every service they tangentially use to get them banned. If they could make the site operator unbankable or unable to receive postal mail it's pretty obvious they gladly would
Could this matrix be compressed to binary form for storage in a binary index?
Horrified gave me a NSFW error
Awesome, to me it seems terrible, and something that can break anytime. You have two layers of translation, the actual FUSE filesystem implementation that uses the FUSE API to communicate with something that emulates a FUSE API in userspace to then talk via NFS to the kernel. NFS is broken in a lot of ways, especially with file locking, that could result in deadlocks.

Really FUSE should be implemented in the kernel itself, it was meant to do so, a kernel-side layer to allow implementing a filesystem userspace efficiently. When they created fuse NFS already existed, and if they decided to create a new protocol and add it to the kernel, rather that something on top of NFS or directly exposing a NFS server in applications, a reason maybe existed right?

Not having a stable FUSE implementation is one of the many reasons that made me abandon macOS and return to the combination of Windows and Linux. Even Windows has a mostly decent open-source FUSE implementation!
Does the KKK use water cannons to hose people down? No. Any benefit KKK members derive from having running water is incidental to their KKK activities. Likewise if some terrorist is watching Netflix to unwind it's not furthering their terrorist activities specifically.

On the other hand, multiple groups of people have targeted Netflix for producing or promoting content that those people find offensive, which is a different situation from providing content.
There is more to the environment than carbon footprint. Meat production is the leading cause of deforestation, it’s the biggest user of water in the south west, the cause of antibiotic resistant bacteria, and that’s ignoring the horrific conditions in factory farms.
>Can you tell me how you did this? It'll be a bit help!

Sorry. It was a few months ago, so I can't remember the intricate details. And my config [as I said previously] was slightly out of the norm. But I did use this site which checks the state of your MTA-STS config and gives you a few clues as to what you need to twiddle:

https://www.mailhardener.com/tools/mta-sts-validator

EDIT: have you tried the MIAB forums? They're quite a helpful bunch:

https://discourse.mailinabox.email
And it's one more thing for buildings to maintain, especially if not gated. In cities like SF it's safe to expect someone to try to dismantle that charger within days to try to sell it for parts.
wav but smaller
Further, try to abide by their requests. If they want the trash can by the door to your office or cubicle on Thursday evening, move the damn trashcan to the door. They have 100 to empty; it's a trivial task for you.

We can get wound up in ourselves and forget to hold a door, or avoid spilling crumbs on our carpet, or log out of our workstation, or use a different hallway when the floor is being waxed, or to move the trash can. It's not really a reflection on our self-importance. It's just a character flaw.
Where’s the consideration for CFs speech? If management doesn’t want to help serve filth, they shouldn’t be compelled to. They’re a private company. It doesn’t even have to be consistent.
Lossless compression of PCM audio
You can rank it however you want. The problem with nodes is that anyone can them up cheaply without having any impact on the security of the network.
Here is an excellent writeup on the forum and the recent drama, that is not actively trying to push an agenda on the situation.

https://defaultfriend.substack.com/p/suicide-by-kiwi-farms
That’s plenty for most applications, no? /var/run/*.sock isn’t that many characters.
I think what you might not be seeing is the entirety of the life cycle and consequences of each action. I am not making the argument that plastic bags are better/worse/neutral. I don't know enough to make that argument at the moment, even if I wanted to. What I am saying is that very few actions come without consequences. And, more often than not, those consequences are not immediately obvious.

Consumers, as a generalization, are pretty dumb. They'll get behind causes because they are told to do so by politicians, news organizations and celebrities. They --the generalized masses-- never use a process that involves critical thinking and informed analysis to make decisions. Perhaps more important than that, they never stop months or years later to evaluate the real outcome of the decisions they made. That's just how things work.

Banning plastic bags did not eliminate the need to carry things. That means a range of solutions surfaced. That ranged from thicker bags to paper bags, both of which were sold as better solutions. And yet, we don't really know. For example: How much more plastic is used to make the thicker bags? How does their entire life cycle rate in terms of energy, resources, pollutants, CO2 and, yes, disposal? Same question about paper. In fact, with paper we can even add questions about deforestation. We need trees to capture CO2. Are we cutting down more vegetation because we banned plastic bags and straws? Are we generating more waste and CO2 because of this and, at the same time, capturing less CO2 because we need more trees?

Again, I am not taking either side. I have written this comment merely to point out that the real effects of any decision are never --ever-- as simple as what we might each see individually. The fact that you don't see plastic waste washing-up on beaches might have no correlation whatsoever to a measurable improvement in waste generation at all.
> The name of the wind

Seriously?
Previous GDPR infringements have a huge impact on severity of future punishments. If they continue to violate GDPR they risk getting fined 4% of the Meta’s worldwide annual revenue (not profit!) or getting outright banned from processing data of EU citizens which would be absolutely devastating for them.
I don't believe in "freedom of association" for monopolies and oligopolies, it's an end-run around our rights by another means. And "freedom of association" was also the excuse given by businesses to not serve black people in the South in the first place.
Organizing through market pressure only works if you're already rich, it's just another concentration of power at the top in what's already a very unequal country. No one is going to pressure or boycott facebook off the internet.
Plus the use of Rice codes for encoding the residuals in as few bits as possible.
> Though, I cannot tell you how many homes in my area have "Climate Action" signs in front of their unnecessarily large homes. One home in particular has one right next to a gas guzzling jeep.

Better than one next to a Prius that commutes 50 miles every day.
1. Yes.

2. Yes.

3. It is not in good faith.
PHP isn't really used as a template language any more. Most people use a different template language for the views. I've implemented two myself[0][1] but an early one was Smarty[2] and there are many others. I hear Twig is pretty good[3].

[0]: https://github.com/jbboehr/php-handlebars
[1]: https://github.com/jbboehr/php-mustache
[2]: https://www.smarty.net/
[3]: https://twig.symfony.com/
Thanks. It's indeed very hard.
Enough of these drones, who else here remember "model planes"?
In public, sure, but a website is explicitly private property, so the megaphone-DDoS move would in this case be trespassing and harassment.

And the slippery slope is a real problem, no matter how much people call it a fallacy. As we’ve seen countless times in history, the distance from viewing some group as less deserving of freedom than you, and actively persecuting them is short.
Imagination (in the sense of "mind images" not creativity) is not universal, and even those with the capacity, the image is usually less distinct than a real image would be.

Plus, people in general find images convincing: In some cases you can even get people to believe impossible things, like meeting Bugs Bunny at Disney World as a kid if you give them a photoshopped picture of it.
> I don't understand why you think banning the content is somehow the cautious course of action.

I didn't intend to say that I think banning is the cautious course of action. My point was that the decision to ban or not ban should be approached carefully.
Cloudflare or any other privately owned company doesn't have an obligation to service everyone. They are not violating their free speech, no matter how long you turn it on every side. Kiwi Farms can host their website on any other platform and get any other service they want. No one is forced to service them.

Let's not forget that they have been known to publicise private information of people that ended up with them being swatted. They are a big enable of this behaviour. Not only that, but they have been also involved in three suicides at this point. I don't think any private company wants to associate themselves with such a client.
How many documents do you have??? Surely one smallish box would do for most people?
The options are not as pure as you make it sound. There is a considerable amount of planning in the free market economies. This ranges from developing transportation networks to deciding upon funding for scientific research. Businesses that control a disproportionate amount of the market also make planning decisions to shape the market. When they make the wrong decisions, there are negative consequences. Arguably, that is what we are seeing at the moment with the supply chain problems. The question is how do you ensure that no single actor gains too much control over a segment of the economy? In many cases, the fallback is central planning. For example: one of the greatest reasons for public highway networks was to diminish the role of railway barons. In other words, centrally planned infrastructure supported a less centralized economy.
See Scribe from the end 70s: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scribe_(markup_language)
I am surprised to hear that multiple namespaces with identical symbols is not a source of confusion for learners. IMO, in high school I would've been lost.
Of course not - it’s Russia who invaded the West. It would be merely a defense and peacekeeping.
How else would the website be removed? Should Cloudflare have hosted a vote or something? I think they took it down because millions of people wanted them to, not on a whim.
> Free speech is more than just an amendment to the constitution. It is also a doctrine that knowledge and discussion should generally be free, and that people shouldn't be persecuted for their beliefs.

"Generally" is an important word here. So is "should". That speech "should generally" be free does not mean all speech is always acceptable.

As the saying goes, your freedom to act ends where my nose begins. When a site is used to organize and synchronise harassment for months, to the at least tacit allowance and at most open encouragement of the site's management, it is way beyond where noses begin.

> It used to be that all forums had pervasive doxxing and swatting.

That is a level of nonsense and whataboutism I've rarely seen.
Interestingly, that thread gives no indication (other than the date it was written) whether the user is mad at CloudFlare for enacting censorship or for the lack of censorship.
The whole problem is exactly selfish short-term gain that eclipses longer-term common gain. Lack of understanding it, and lack of the ability to create a social system that works better towards it, to my mind, is directly related to our (limited) intelligence as a species.

Lack of kindness does play a serious role, can't disagree.