skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Depends on context, in music, economics, etc velocity doesn’t include a vector.

But to help clarify the point, if the project knew what was useless then people wouldn’t be working on it. Essentially, the team is defining useful work by what’s being worked on which robs the direction of any meaning.
https://archive.ph/Qo2wu
Thanks for the tips. We’ve implemented some of these measures already and it has helped. We’ve had phone verification from day one for example. we try to balance the opportunity cost when possible.

For example, we lose a lot of potential clients due to them being turned off by the phone verification, though we rationalize that by saying that the support and operational costs are a lot lower this way as the driver can get in touch with the clients should there be any issues.

I think the next steps as you outlined are to build additional flows for fraudulent users and regularly verifying some heuristics on our data. We’ve haven’t gotten there yet due to it not being that pressing, but it’s clear we’ll need to do so as we keep gaining traction.

I’ll definitely keep your contact in hand when we visit this issue further!
It's all containerized. The only reason for it to go down is if DO or CF have an outage. Which is rare enough that it's not an issue for me.
Some of the images on there would have given me nightmares as a child…
What are you going to believe, the instructions in the binary itself or what someone may or may not remember when it was written? The latter is good if you want to have some historical context around certain decisions, but the former is far more concrete when trying to understand how it works and how to modify it.
Is Sauron against unions?
Excellent work. We need more of these build-it-once peer to peer serverless webpages.
There isn't, in the big picture, a huge level of such vitriol.

It's mostly that it's a very easy angle to write click-friendly articles about.

You can easily go "nut-picking" on Twitter, and find people saying whatever crazy thing you need for an article like that.
Any link to architecture of it?
> a terrible way to invest. No party has a concrete plan or vision for how to use it, they just throw money because there is a consensus of good feeling around it.

Almost if I were reading about cryptocoins.
> The trilogy was great because of the writings of Tolkien. Peter Jackson did his best respecting that and telling Tolkien's story, not his own. I think that's why they were successful.

Laughable statement.
Where did Gandalf hit Pippin when they talked to Denethor in the books? That was in complete contradiction with the Gandalf from the books so please dont tell me this was faithful in any way.
No that’s ridiculous. I don’t want to do that job and I wouldn’t choose it but I absolutely can do it. I cleaned my own house just fine for 20 years before I hired someone else to do it for me.
Interactive tool to generate basic design systems
Crypto researcher’s fake Ponzi raises $100K in hours
I think it's more complicated than that.

Humans are a pretty apex species. Any ecosystem we move into, we have the tools and ability to dominate it with little effort.

Humans also, somewhat recently in our timeline, began to really understand and appreciate the effects we have on ecosystems. Additionally, there is some collective desire to try to preserve the state of these areas, so future generations can also admire + study them.

When we inadvertently (or deliberately) manipulate an ecosystem, and observe the damage it causes, we try to fix it. Maybe it's hubris to think that we can do so w/o damaging it another way, but we like to try. Especially when it could damage something else that directly impacts something we value, like a local economy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3oLeSPINOk
> the idea that new species "destroy" ecosystems is really flawed.

it's not. If a species were to naturally migrate, it takes decades, or even centuries, to cross continents. This gives the destination ecosystem time to adjust.

But because humans travel so fast, and so far, migration of species piggybacking reach previously unreachable ecosystems without letting the natural balance to actually happen - therefore, destroying an ecosystem in the process (or, in your words, the ecosystem is changed so much as to be unrecognizable, since existing species cannot compete at all).

> preserving the purity of a local ecosystem is not the same thing as preserving the purity of your local human race, but it's not entirely different either.

it's definitely different. Purity of human race is social - the genetic differences are barely noticeable. "purity" of an ecosystem is not about race, nor purity, but about biodiversity, and keeping balance. An invasive species that naturally reach a destination would not be considered an invasive species.
GDP?
The conflict is between one-person/one-vote and a cartel that has hijacked a nation.
Life is nicer when you spend it being nice.
Yes, everyone wants them built somewhere else, preferably out in flyover country where all those racist fascists live.
I talk to the janitor daily. He used to be a schoolteacher and mainly took the job for health insurance benefits. Folks often look down on this type of workers. I quite often find genuine human beings in them, they don’t have to pretend at all…
But often does because the host, external lib or cloudfaire has an issue.
And even Apple ships a power only USB C cable that doesn’t support data with their non MagSafe equipped MacBooks.
This is talking about tensors in AI.

I don't know much about tensors used in AI or in physics. But I do know quite a bit about mathematical constructs being used across different domains and very often the definition is subtly different, so you cannot make a statement about the definition of tensors in physics and assume it'll hold for tensors in AI.
That is likely true for the transmission of the audio signal.
Regarding the music itself I have heard complaints to the contrary. Loudness war/race and reduced dynamics are keywords I recall here. To blame was the way the audio was mixed before release. I'm not an audiophile though
How is this legal? If someone commissions a painting from you, you're not allowed to just say "I'm not giving you the painting, but I'm keeping your money." Why does doing it with a computer make it okay?
I watched the first episode of House of Dragons passively in the background while doing work, but it kept catching my attention. I watched it again in the background, and other parts of it kept catching my attention.

By episode three, it had my devoted attention. This is definitely a great show.
My reading of this is "yes my (credit card) address is 123 fake st, but please deliver to the park across the street".
Well, I prefer that people ignore me when I work in service roles. There's no better way to observe people in their natural habitat. I once drove Uber and Lyft for a couple of years and was fascinated by what I learned by people who thought they were confessing to an uneducated driver. Why do this? Well maybe you're writing a book or working on a PhD thesis.

https://learn.trakstar.com/blog/janitors-with-phds
I feel like you are a bit understating your role here... jgarzik was one of the early Bitcoin core developers.
Tolkien created one of the most fleshed out fantasy universes to date. As a result, there's a not inconsiderable number of die hard fans who don't react well to disregarding canon as there is a rather insane amount of detail spelled out in the books.

As long as one can get in the mindset of 'this is some disposable Tolkien-ish fantasy content', it's an OK bit of filler (IMO, having watched the first couple of episodes)
> I don't understand how it would improve privacy in the first place?

Same reason why you'd probably pay less attention to no-parking signs if you knew you'd likely face a $50 fine for violating them, vs. if you had to show up to court and testify in front of a judge. Milder consequences hold you less accountable and incentivize you to be more careless with everything, including people's privacy.
I do get being nice to janitors--and I am happy to help them with something if asked, and I don't "ignore" them as noted in this article as I definitely agree that's rude to treat them as second-class humans unworthy of being regarded with eye contact or banter--but I am being paid to do my job and they are being paid to their job and if I am spending my time or mental energy doing part of their job then I feel like something in the division of labor has failed. No one wants me spending my time working on the website or managing the social media account, and while every department certainly has something I could add to my task list to make their job easier--such as going out of my way to maintain a high-level changelog of the product or maintain a list of new translation syringe--it is their job to let me do my job, and we hired the people to do the extra work of going back through the work I did and finding those things I didn't write down at the time so I could maximize the time I spend on new development or architecture or debugging or cutting server costs or whatever it is that I was hired to do. I also think there is something to the people who argue that if you go out of your way to put away carts or use self-checkout "to help the people who work there" without realizing that you are REPLACING the people who work there--as, due to your efforts, the company can hire fewer people to do whatever that job is--then you are not actually their friend. While I avoid getting crumbs on the carpet because it is likely to attract ants or cause other forms of permanent damage to the room in the form of ground-in debris or stains, it just isn't clear to me that the most "janitor friendly" action--in the long run--wouldn't be to actively create as large of a mess as I can without people deciding I am myself such a liability that I lose my own job (and one could imagine actually conspiring with the janitorial staff over creating such elaborate "but understandable" messes ;P). Certainly, if we merely move all the trash cans to where they are most quickly gathered, the company would be almost negligent to not assign the janitor some new task to fill the time that was saved (or reduce their hours, or scale down the department, etc.).
Everywhere else four ring binders?

I think not.

The most common standard outside North America is two ring.
The question is: do all these sport "hunters" make any difference at all in the lionfish population? My guess is No.

We could pay a bounty for killing mosquitos, but it wouldn't be nearly as effective as draining all the standing water, or introducing birth control of some sort.

If I'm right that they're having no effect, then either a CRISPR solution, or introducing a natural predator is the answer (assuming that the predator doesn't introduce its own problems).
Performance is not a primary objective for most software. For the subset where it is, most performance is architectural; if you don't design for performance from the outset then you'll never be able to add it later.

People that have been in the performance business a long time, the kind of people you want if performance matters, can estimate the performance of code without running it to a degree of accuracy that is surprising to people with no performance engineering experience. Not understanding the relationship between code and performance is not the same as no one being able to understand the relationship between code and performance. It is a specialized discipline but people in it don't need to measure code for macro-optimization purposes. You still need to measure some things for micro-optimization purposes, but even there you'll find savants that really don't need to.

Naturally, there is an element of many developers overestimating their ability to estimate code performance. That is not universal though. I've worked with developers that could consistently and precisely describe the performance characteristics of code on real hardware without running it. A lot of computer science is premised on this being possible. Acting like this is unknowable is doing a disservice to computer science as a discipline.

If you understand how code interacts with hardware then performance is deterministic and obvious. There are degrees, of course, but some developers have a deeply intuitive understanding of these relationships.
Search with Bing in the Microsoft Edge browser – earn up to 600 points a month
I'm frequently guilty of reading the comments first, getting sucked into links, and never reading the original article.

Thanks for the FYI.
More generally:

PoS will be on AWS or similar.

PoW and PoST will not be on AWS or similar.
How would you make sure the gene edits don't also wipe out the problem in their original habitat too?
How much deleting do you do? About 50% of my postings here at HN are deleted (by me) once I think about what I want to say, and decide it doesn't really add value. By then, I've gotten the snark or "yeah, but what about X" energy out of my body, it's better for me, and for everyone else when I just back out of it.

How much editing do you do? I write up all of my thoughts. Then move the words around in the compose box until it looks good. Then, after I hit "add comment" I find at least one spelling error each and every time.

You've got up to 2 hours here to edit comments if someone points out issues, I try to make good use of that time.
HI, yes, the plan was to build or integrate with a FHIR API to retrieve EMR/claims data from healthcare providers, so we can mine those data as well.
I mean I have already conceded that you are Galileo, einstein and newton rolled in to one. Just like Galileo and flat earthers you are going against the "current dogma" . I have already acknowledged the superiority of your views. What more do you want?
Yes, this 100%. Though, as other comments have printed out: you need to take application and scale into account.

Fundamentally it's a question of how one should go about handling multi-tenant situations.
"The effect of vaccination was not systematically assessed."
> If someone neglects to clear their home area of burn material, and their house catches fire then burns their neighbors house - there certainly is a liability.

This is actually incorrect. Liability only exists if you start the fire (and often times requires the element of negligence or intent).

> We live in a society where individual actions and rights have boundaries when they cause social effects

And that's why it's illegal to siphon your neighbors groundwater. We have hundreds of years of court cases on groundwater rights and they are generally clear - the owner of the land has rights to the groundwater before appropriation.

You can't build your home in a desert and then complain that it's a desert. That's a you problem. Go live somewhere with water.
Tolkien actually fought in the World War and was trying to make a anti-war and anti-industrialization message.

For example he portrays Melkor (the ultimate evil in his lore) as the Maia (think Catholic saint) responsible for Industrialization, where one of his greatest achievements was building a fortress that was a factory that had chimneys that spewed coal smoke...

Even artisan characters were often portrayed negatively (Sauron, that made the Rings of Power, or the guy that made the Silmarils and then people commited genocide and other atrocities because of them).

One of the most famous obviously war-inspired scene Tolkien wrote, were the dead marches, that are absolutely creepy and repulsive, and they were basically a description of the terrain during the Battle of the Somme, where he was physically present in the trenches fighting.
My question is about how to realize an invisible menu of scripts so that I can invisibly select individual scripts to run (present) from that menu. I don't see how clipboard functions would help with that.
You would actually like the show, the main moral is exactly the tolkien one you mention. The interview person is not saying it's good to do evil to do good, just that it is a theme in the show as it is in lord of the rings.
Diskuv OCaml – The Windows-friendly distribution of OCaml
Amazon/Netflix/Disney all provide 30+ subtitle tracks for every show, by the way. I don't think you should make any conclusions from the amount of subtitles. And besides, for all we know, they could be very bad.
If poisoning pigs were known to be more effective than shooting, would that change the calculus?
Not software emulated, but software defined.

For example, you can get a pair of enormous 100 Tbps core switch/routers for your data centre from Cisco. Upgrading these is terrifying, they cost an incredible amount of money, and if one fails you lose 50% capacity. Conversely, if you run them active-passive, you waste 50% of your capital investment.

Alternatively, you could use a cluster of 1000 VMs on commodity hardware to run your traffic management, with the rules defined purely in software. This can be an order of magnitude cheaper, scale to infinity, and allow smooth upgrades and change rollouts.

The former is what every large enterprise does, the latter is what the public cloud hosting providers do. You can't argue that it's some sort of "fake substitute" when the clouds operate production networks at a scale that far outstrips anything you'd find in any private data centre!

Similarly, many large enterprises use and prefer monolithic mainframes, but in the cloud the preferred option is something like Kubernetes.

For example, with K8s on a typical cloud, it's possible to use "spot" instances to temporarily scale out workloads at night for batch processing to use tens of thousands of CPU cores. No on-prem mainframe can compete with that on any metric. Not absolute throughput, not price, not price/performance.
The goal is to support all libraries, but because there are some out there that dynamically compile/load code at runtime, despite it being a bad idea, there will necessarily be some libraries that are not supported, at least in the near term. Likewise, you might also want to compile a library for say, Wasm, that uses a NIF which lacks support for that target, which wouldn't work; but this is already a restriction with the BEAM today with NIFs (i.e. if they don't support a particular target, then the library won't work).

But as long as a library only uses code loading APIs at compile-time, and not runtime, it should be supported just fine. To be clear, we only plan to raise runtime errors in those cases, as if the call failed normally, and not prevent compilation just because a call to one of those APIs exists in the code, though we may choose to emit diagnostic warnings for it, that remains to be seen.
It depends on the job. A large part of my job is collaboration. The times that I have to put my head down and focus are the exception and in those cases I will put myself on DND anyway.

I think as a developer it would be very different.
Twice in the past century the US changed paper sizes.

During WWII, to save paper, the government mandated that letter size would be one inch shorter, so it was 7 1/2 x 10. This innovation did not survive the war.

Legal documents submitted to court had to be on legal size paper. In Florida, this was prohibited by the end of the 1980's. Land deeds followed thereafter.

Not sure when federal courts jumped to letter paper.

Letter paper is the default for LaTeX. Thank the gods for the KOMA classes.
I agree with your arguments when it comes to "preserving the purity of your local human race" or culture - it's essentially impossible to stop those shifts. However I don't think it applies the same way to invasive species - people and their ideas are very hard to filter for in terms of immigration but stopping people from bringing in animals or plants is much easier and we have systems for that already in place.
Bullshit. I find that user reviews and critic reviews often diverge in the same way that an Adam Sandler movie is never going to win an Oscar even if it is popular with theatergoers, but that's fine. In fact, I find it really useful to categorize movie reviews as:

* High critic score, high audience score - OK, why did everybody love this movie?

* High critic score, low audience score - usually a more "niche" or academic topic, definitely something that will make me think, even if I don't like the movie.

* Low critic score, high audience score - A "turn my brain off and enjoy it" kind of movie.
Not when the entire team is in on the charade. Or enough are in on it such that they bloat sizes unreasonably.

Also what you describe sounds... Like something I wouldn't want to be a part of. Breaking down smaller stories only to fold them into a bigger one?
Metaverse: when you have to fight internet trolls instead of real trolls.
I'm not saying it will or won't be popular. I'm saying the quality of the writing according to "proc0" is not going to have any impact on the situation.
What’s the fatality rate of those monitors vs. the rest of the crew?
This is one of the things I'm personally excited about using Firefly for, since I first started working professionally with Erlang/Elixir, I wanted the ability to use it for CLIs. You can be sure it will be a use case well supported :)
> Then i guess don't give them pointy ears.

Not giving them some distinguishing physical characteristic sounds like a great way to make the work more difficult to understand. Personally I don’t mind the change.

> I remember reading they had long hair, regardless they are called something different and have completely different lives.

Some of them had long hair, but presumably others don’t. I’m not aware of any part of the Legendarium which suggests all elves had long hair. That would seem like an uncharacteristic thing for Tolkien to write about them.

> While true, in fantasy all kinds of mixes are possible that result in creatures like minotaurs, half-orcs, half-demons, half-dragons, etc., and those are obviously not human.

This is not D&D. As far as I know, there’s nothing in the Legendarium suggesting there can be unions of anything other than Men and Elves, Men and Orcs, and Elves and Maiar.

A union of an Elf and Maia happened exactly once, and is a bit of an odd becuse Maiar choose the physical form they take. Melian presumably clothed herself in the body of an Elf, at least as far as mattered.

The Men and Orcs thing is unusual in two ways. One is that it’s not explicit how they were combined. Saruman did it… somehow, but the implication is that it was through his art (magic). yhe other is that, depending on the day, Tolkien considered Orcs to be anywhere between corrupted Elves/Men, fallen Maiar, or something like animals. He wasn’t ever comfortable with the ramifications of any of these different origins had, but I think that at the time of writing Lord of the Rings, the idea was that they were corrupted Elves. I’m not super sure on that though. Either way though, I can see a lot more philosophical justification for Men and Orcs being crossed than Men and dragons, balrogs, or anything else that isn’t an Elvish/Mannish being.

Anyway, this is a long way to say that just because it happens in other fantasy settings doesn’t mean it applies here. Tolkien thought about this kind of stuff a lot, and wrote extensively on it. If you’re interested in reading more about this kinda thing, I highly recommend the History of Middle Earth series of books, especially Morgoth’s Ring, which deals a lot with the nature of existence (both physical matter and things like souls) in the Legendarium.
They've had something similar off-core with GNA since 2019 10th gen Ice Lake for low-power always-on inference use-cases.
Plant-based meat substitutes are getting pretty good days, but it will be interesting to see how soon we can sustainably produce lab-grown meat at scale. I've been a vegetarian for about two years now for both environmental and ethical reasons, but I would be perfectly alright with eating meat again if that tech matures enough to enter the market at a reasonable price.