skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Which compiler would be required for this (https://github.com/corsix/amx/blob/main/aarch64.h)?

I understand the limitation is not at the OS side, as nothing can be done there, but at the compiler-side (I mean that the Apple-supplied compiler doesn't compile against the AMX instruction set, so you'd need a compatible one that, I understand, doesn't exist).

Or is it just undocumented and you can actually get it to work with a Standard xcode and macOS installation given the headers provided?
No, it was COVID - I took a quick home test and, by the time the liquid reached the control line, the "you have COVID" line was already bright red. A PCR test later that day confirmed it.

And second, I have never had these types of symptoms before - fever yes, dry cough no. Sure, I also have never been this old before, but if I get COVID and suffer the symptoms that health authorities say are typical of COVID, Ocam's razor would force me to discard the "it must have been something else" theory.
On income? How would this work?

As a CF customer, I am far more concerned with a policy or precedent of capriciously cutting off customers than a policy of defending "bad" customers.
Around $56/mo in Colombia with access to top doctors, hospitals and clinics. Copay is $6 for any appointment. But surgery/ER/hospitalization incidents are free
This equating of what-you-put-in to what-you-get-out is a moral choice you can make, but it's easy not to make it. It's widely recognized as hateful.

- people's particular successes depend onthw rest of society, they didn't create everything themselves. This should factor into the deservingness calculation.

- we have an instinctual desire to take care of the needy (children and elderly in particular); not to honor this would be inhuman.

- and: why? Why be so selfish, when you have the option to love others and be kind to them? What are you really getting out of it? Rewarding yourself, your whims and appetites... It's stupid. It's hollow, and contemptible, and childish. You can be so much better than that.
Also from crazy high taxation, inflation, and soon to come energy rationing
I only have to use a third party app to change the settings on the headset (like equalizer and noise canceling level). For my devices I have no need to change these more than a couple of times per year, at most. For my Bose QC35 I think I've never touched the app after first configuration. Those settings are stored in the headset, so once I've set them they stay the same regardless what device the audio streams from.

The vendor lock-in is by definition there if there are any special Apple features. If there is no vendor lock-in, there is neither any special Apple-exclusive magic features that justify the price premium?

I know my FIIL buds don't have active noise canceling. They are IEMs and give about 20 dB passive noise reduction which is more than enough. The microphone quality is decent, but for any longer calls I use my Jabra which has a proper mic.
You can run pretty much any native app from 1995 for any platform in emulation. Network requirements were uncommon outside of networking-specific apps.

You can render a web page from 1995 but you can’t run any server-side logic if you don’t have a copy of the server.
Fun fact though, on Linux you can force high-bitrate SBC on almost any headphone to get almost the same result as AptX.
Hey, your site is down.
> The post is showing that the rate of side effects is lower than placebo.

That's completely false:

> The Pfizer trial exhibited a 36 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group

> The Moderna trial exhibited a 6 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group
It doesn't matter how much it costs anyone because your circumstances and needs will be wildly different than others, and you may qualify for subsidies.

I would figure out how much your current health insurance is (both the employee and employer contribution). This is the amount you would pay if you quit your job and went on COBRA. You can be on COBRA for 18 months and it's typically cheaper than finding an equivalent plan on the marketplace. That gives you time to grow your business and figure out a long term health insurance solution.
Any relation to Spanish ñ ?
Someone posted an archive.ph link up-thread.

[Edit] That was a bit unhelpful.

If you hit a paywall, do this:

- Copy the url you're visiting to the clipboard.

- Visit archive.ph

- Paste the URL from your clipboard, and submit the search.
I feel like this approach can run into some problems:

1. Some people physically or mentally can't contribute to to disability or some other disorder.

2. Some people can't contribute because they were not provided with/are not provided with the opportunity to gain those skills.

3. It's very, very hard to quantify how much one contributes to society, especially when a task requires lots of people doing small things, or few people doing big things. Pay offers some signal for this in some cases, but at best it's talking about the economy - itself a proxy of society which layers on its own incentives.

I'm raising these three points because I know that if I were to respond with "That seems unfair and it's not the sort of society I'd like to live in" the counter response to that would likely be "we should aim for equality of opportunity, not equality of outcome". The point of my comment is to effectively say that it's very hard to measure opportunity and outcome when one takes into account individual circumstances, and it's even harder to get to the root of what we mean by 'equality' (mathematical equality? qualitatitve equality? quantitative equality? equality before the law?).
i appreciate it.

I would never touch a .0 release of a new version of SQLite. No shame against them or their fantastic quality--it's just that I have lived through literal decades of watching minor database bugs shatter data value and undermine all efficiency.

When I see a .3 or better, I start thinking a version is usable. The fact the SQLite moves their quality needle this quickly is encouraging.

But maybe .4 can go more quietly.
> Without internet he was unable to figure out whether he should continue, turn around, or wait out the accident.

I think that this is an interesting corner case, but I don’t think the solution decision tree is that complicated:

1. Every Tesla has comes with an adapter that plugs into a regular outlet. It’s very slow (maybe 3-5 miles an hour charge), but it’s enough to recharge anywhere that has electricity in an emergency. This is slow and may require an extended stay at a hotel (or sleeping in your car), but we are talking about a super rare emergency situation.

2. I would default to not taking a long detour in general in an ev unless I knew where I was going to charge. That would be like taking a detour on a back road in an isolated area on a fraction of a tank of gas without knowing how far the next gas station is or whether it would be open — just not wise.

3. If he was near a charging station in the direction he was going on the main road, I would lean towards just waiting it out. Tesla’s use very little charge when not moving. 12-24 hours would be fine (if boring).

4. If he was not near a charging station in the direction he was going, then I would recommend turning around and finding the nearest charger or find a place you can charge on a regular outlet — drastic situations call for drastic solutions.

I guess I can say that I feel sorry for EV owners who lack the ability to think logically and/or analytically, but these problems, while different than ICE problems, are not terribly difficult to figure out.

I think that I have heard of one challenging charging scenario in the US that is specific to EVs…

There is a wind corridor on some highway that spans from Texas to Colorado. Cars of any kind get reduced mileage by a lot if they are driving into heavy winds that are common on this road. Not a problem with ubiquitous gas stations, but I don’t think the charger network accommodated this wind factor as of last year, so people had to drive at unusually slow speeds in order to extend their range.

That said, I heard that Tesla was building an extra charging station or two on this route to address this issue, and it wouldn’t surprise me if other charging station operators did so as well. It’s just a super weird and rare driving and charging situation that is/was easily solved.
We can't even get a stable grid, decent infrastructure, or stocked supermarkets... let alone fancy technology. I would't hold my breat about that going forward.
Basically like GCC with VI, or using Clion or Visual Studio kind of difference.
Our high deductible insurance with Kaiser is about 12k/yr for a family of 3: two parents in their 50s and a teen. Then I max out an HSA (untaxed health savings account to actually pay for things) with about 7k, which generally gets drawn down to zero at some point over any 3 yr period. So I call it about 20k/yr all up.
240V are what run electric stoves. I guess no cooking either. Why don't we just have a functioning grid like civilized society?
Please continue supporting iOS/Android streaming SDKs
As of September 1st, Spotify concluded its half-decade-long effort to stop developers from building experiences that allowed streaming outside of their own first-party apps.

Starting with libspotify and then switching off their streaming SDKs earlier this month. An alternative to both was promised but none ever materialised.

As a result, hundreds of apps still using this SDK out of necessity, have gone dark.
You should go on healthcare.gov and look at plans. Insurance plans are variable from person to person and situation.
In snowy conditions you don't actually want all the torque available: then you'd want to control the torque applied instead of the power delivered when starting to move (similar to placing a restriction on the top torque by shifting into second gear on manual shift cars).
I'm not necessarily taking a position here but this feels you are saying only rich people make things like Starlink and Tesla which I feel is true but also wrong. If there were no billionaires people would still be making companies but you currently only see things like Tesla and Starlink from people like Elon because only he has the money to fight the uphill battle that legally entrenches conglomerates in their position.
> with the help of standards bodies and browser vendors

Who are made out of people (developers) building for the web, and users of the web as well.

Lets not pretend that these web applications were forced upon us by outside forces.
NYC, $2,500/mo, two adults + one child. We're expecting our second child, and it'll increase to ~$3,200/mo.

We're in our mid-30s, healthy (run marathons), non-smokers, with no prescriptions. Not having insurance means carrying the risk of going bankrupt after one unlucky event.
Malthus was right. He was just ahead of his time. There are too many people in the world and it's the cause of climate change and almost every problem.
kodak's influence i guess
> Better would be to have a consistent measurement system in base 12.

Or a system in base 60, where 12 and 5 are alternating:

- 12 hairs = 1 graph square
- 5 graph squares = 1 inch
- 12 inches = 1 foot
- 5 feet = 1 manlet
- 12 manlets = 1 stone's throw
- 5 stone's throws = 1 dash

And so on
oh absolutely.

but they're already there, looks like.
Compilers wouldn’t target it. You’d get to it via https://developer.apple.com/documentation/accelerate
Assume you may end up paying $500/mo for yourself in the US, or more. It gets worse as you age, and if you need a better plan (to control deductibles, etc) it'll cost you more. Last time I freelanced (at age ~28) it cost me about that much for a mediocre Kaiser plan in California.
$370 / month for Kaiser gold. 32, don't smoke, and no pre-existing conditions. Seeing the doctor costs me $50-$100 per visit.

It's a bit depressing (but not surprising) to see any comment using dollars paying tons for limited service, and comments using euros pay a cut for everything
>What do you mean? Fahrenheit is not logarithmic.

It's not like I didn't explicitly cover that:

"I'm not claiming we do perceive temperature logarithmically - just making an analogy with another case (sound) in which we don't use a straight linear relationship because it doesn't match our intuitive perception (e.g. of volume "doubling")."

So, no, I'm not saying temperature perception is logarithmic and Fahrenheit is logarithmic to match it.

I'm just saying that similarly to how dB suits sound perception better (because it's logarithmic and more appropriate to our logarithmic perception of volume), fahrenheit might fit intuitive temperature perception better (because it's more appropriate to our perception of temperature).

Actually, I'm not even saying this is the case. Just that I've read and heard people claim that, so it could be (I'm not from a fahrenheit using country, so can't speal for how it intuitively feels), for one example:

https://thevane.gawker.com/fahrenheit-is-a-better-temperatur...
It’s a physical good. The reason is that it’s easy to fold in half and it offers a good enough granularity of size.

Also having a measuring system in base 10 when you use base 10 for notation will always be more handy to calculate even it has less divisors. Your comment is the kind of comment which can only be made by someone who has never used metric.
I love how the article focuses on blaming the victim.
Ok, thanks for the opinion, TradingView is a charting library that is used in the app.
I think the point is explained further below - the author is making a reference to the amount of energy required if the world had a developed standard of living, not saying that we would ever use natural gas down there.

> It can be done. In the near term, it is conceivable that already-common sources of renewable energy like wind and solar power can meet most of the need. Things would be easier if existing nuclear power technologies were expanded, or at least if we avoided shutting such plants down prematurely.

> But the more fanciful world described above—the one in which, thanks to plentiful energy, the world has eliminated want—is possible only with continued innovation. In the long term, the renewables we currently have will hit a ceiling.
Energy is not sufficient to do stuff. You still need a thing to convert that energy into something useful, and those things cost money as well. Taking refrigeration as an example; using my local home improvement store as an example (which isn't the most representative for the costs applicable to national development, but should be good enough for napkin math):

A refrigerator/freezer running at 1.17 KwH/day goes for about $800 USD. [0]

For $100 USD, I can get a solar panel that claims about 300 Wh/day[1]

This puts the cost of energy at about the same as the cost of making the energy useful. Obviously Rwanda isn't going to buy retail from Home Depot. Further, I suspect that when done at scale, you will find that the discount you see over retail for energy is more significant than the discount you see for refrigerators.

Granted, making the refrigerator requires energy. However, it also requires a factory and components. Making those requires energy, but also other factories and components.

Looking at how this plays out in a developed country. In the US 2021, the electricity industry had a revenue of about $430 Billion [2], for an economy with a GDP of about 23 Trillion [3]. In total, energy accounts for about 5% of GDP. [4]

Running that $800 USD refrigerator I mentions above would cost me about $0.08 USD/day

Sure, doing stuff requires energy, and we need to prepare for the energy demands of developing nations to increase. However, the cost of energy is a small fraction of the cost of most of the stuff you want to do with the energy. Sure, if energy was orders of magnitude cheaper, then that may enable more usages of energy, but even those things would require investment beyond energy generation to do.

[0] https://www.homedepot.com/p/Frigidaire-20-5-cu-ft-Top-Freeze...

[1] https://www.homedepot.com/p/Grape-Solar-100-Watt-Monocrystal...

[2] https://www.statista.com/statistics/190548/revenue-of-the-us...

[3] https://www.bea.gov/news/2022/gross-domestic-product-fourth-...

[4] https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=53620
Your action is part of a Reply-All Apocalypse.

Everyone chimes in with something either saying "STOP", "drop me off the list" or "hey everyone stop replying to everyone"
Musk is a bad example, he didn't actually invent or develop those things you mentioned, he just acts as the figurehead. If he disappeared today, the only thing we would miss would be his hot Twitter takes.
I was about to write a comment about energetic Marxism and the Energy Theory of Value
Try your definition of “slow” on a iPhone 12 Pro Max using a cord that only delivers power over 5W. Better yet, try charging an iPad 12” Pro (that does have a USB C port) with a USB C cable that can only do 5W. Now try to use that same “standard USB C” cable to charge a 16 inch MacBook Pro.

Of course that standard cable is not guaranteed to support data at all.

So much for a “standard”.
Not even just hundreds of thousands, but millions. At least 2.6 million, and possibly as far back as 4.5 million.

But yes, with the data being in favor of humans being meat eaters, absent any potential health consequences from such a diet (not that I personally believe there are), the science should be far more rigorous. Actually, much of it isn't science, because epidemiology is not a science any more than "computer science."

In case, if anyone here this wants some reading material, or to consider that the case against meat is anything but clear:

Behavioral Characteristics and Self-Reported Health Status among 2029 Adults Consuming a “Carnivore Diet”

https://academic.oup.com/cdn/article/5/12/nzab133/6415894

^^ To be clear, I consider this kind of research as dubious as similar studies both refuting carnivory or supporting plant-based diets. What it does do is counter the idea that humans aren't supposed to eat meat on the same level as the evidence used to support that claim.

Why Humans Eat Meat

https://www.history.com/news/why-humans-eat-meat

For 2 Million Years, Humans Ate Meat And Little Else

https://www.timesofisrael.com/for-2-million-years-humans-ate...

Exceptionally high δ15N values in collagen single amino acids confirm Neandertals as high-trophic level carnivores

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421459/

Stable isotope dietary analysis of the Tianyuan 1 early modern human

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2706269/

Evolutionary basis for the human diet: consequences for human health

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31733113/

Comparative Digestive Physiology

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4458075/
Still sounds preferable compared to the US to be honest (as a US citizen with a residency visa app pending with a Western European country). Note the respondent paying $1800/month for two 63 year olds, or folks spending $2k-$3k/month for a family. These costs are simply unsustainable. Europe will eventually get their energy situation resolved, sooner than the US will fix their healthcare situation.
> Because if we banned sites for causing suicides then Instagram, Facebook, and TikTok would be off the internet.

You'd have to ban mainstream news outlets for the exact same reason.
AirTags have a lot of privacy protections. The stalkers were only caught because they were dumb enough to use their own identifiable Apple IDs.

Just creating one with a fake protonmail email will make it quite difficult, though you will also have to purchase an iOS device just for that. Still not unthinkable.

You can even build your own tracker for some apple's network: https://github.com/seemoo-lab/openhaystack
If I'm buying into your line of reasoning, then you should concede that 5G is a terrible name for this suite of services as anyone who has home 5G wifi or understandably conflates 5G with mmWave would say that 5G is junk because it cannot penetrate walls (or glass).
Show HN: Number of layers for efficient fine-tuning. Experiments
Model fine-tuning allows you to improve the quality of the pre-trained models with just a fraction of the resources spent on training the original model. Qdrant team has run several experiments to test the number of layers to fine-tune.
Waves Could Power a Clean Energy Future
StarLink? Teslas? ... Impressive technology but I think you're really overstating their contribution to society ...

Which, if you accept that, rather undermines your entire point.
If you’re in the US, you can get some detailed quotes (and information on what tax benefits, if any, you may be eligible for) at healthcare.gov
> I wouldn't be able to use Starlink or buy a Tesla. So I'm actually better off with inequality

That's great for you (and me). But the overwhelming majority of people on this planet are lower down the stack and can neither afford a Starlink nor a Tesla nor anything even close. That's the problem.

> As long as there's a rough connection between contribution and wealth, I'm happy with the system and any inequality that it generates

I'd love to know how you define "contribution".
The feudal lords will call on their bannermen to take up arms via Twitter.
The UK authorities agree with you: if you pass the exam with a manual car you can use both, but if you pass it with an automatic one, you can only drive automatic ones.
I am building a little open source toolkit on top of Next that hopefully alleviates alot of repetition.

https://github.com/aniftyco/next-saas

I open source as much as I can tbh: https://github.com/aniftyco
Yep just looked and it's just a bad css rule. Nothing to see here.

And looks like a fix is already going out https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.dev/issues/2721
Clearly Apple doesn't think the USB-C standard is so horrible since they are using it everywhere else in their ecosystem.
He goes into it in an older comment in his history:
https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=Orthanc
Reduce, not eliminate.

Put pressure though taxes, regulations, etc that benefit people owning things to do stuff with them and penalize people owning things to make money from somebody else doing things with them.

Investment will always be an important mechanism, it just needs to be a bit more disadvantaged than it is at the moment.

One of the mechanisms is as simple as taxing vacancy. If you own commercial or residential property that isn’t occupied, your taxes go way up to encourage you to drop prices until it gets used or you decide to sell.
>own risk

FYI the english term for that is “excess”
You're over generalizing. Not all enthusiasts value the same point. For some including myself, it's not about acceleration or speed. Automatic (DCT and the new ZF8) has long surpassed manual transmission in almost all aspects of performance. It's similar to how some people like manual espresso machines, film cameras, etc. It's a hobby and you enjoy the process. See how the newest Koenigsegg goes great length to make this weird automatic manual.
Red giant Betelgeuse was yellow-orange some 2k years ago
I love a page that is completely blank after failing to load 70 third–party scripts.
One thing I’ve learned over time is that it’s just really, really difficult for most people (including me!) to reason about things that they haven’t directly experienced. Even harder to have empathy. So it’s very hard to engage with an argument or discussion that’s about the world as a whole, because all of us have such difficulty properly weighting and evaluating the things we have no experience with (which by definition, for everyone, is most of the world).
$550/month for myself, $1100/month for my family (Switzerland, which has world's second most expensive healthcare, and insurance is obligatory for all, and only could be paid in after-tax money).
Yeah I can find animal fossils way older than dinosaurs in my limestone driveway, by picking up pretty much any rock.
Yea, but power is Kraft.