skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
So a non-comedic version of this Mitchell and Webb skit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqYyxvM85zU
But, Seth, what do you advise?
Sounds like it is less technical correct?
I find that there are a lot of auditing firms out there willing to do compliance work for cheap therefor bringing down the prices (still not super low).

Technical auditing and training in cyber security was always a kind of niche that allows you to charge more.
For a once in a generation shift in technology? There are probably individual pieces of equipment in the service department that cost more than that.
>European fantasy stories

European history should be portrayed accurately, be it fantasy or reality. It seems that those that shout loudest about cultural appropriation are the first to glorify cultural appropriation when it suites their world view.
Dev Diary: What It Took to Bring Wi-Fi Support to Original Prusa MINI+
$150/hr for small (<= 10 hour) projects but I did lower my upwork to $90 before the pandemic to try and see if it got me any inbound leads (it did not).

$4000/week with no Fridays for bigger contracts.

It usually gets negotiated down for startups and non-profits.
I sort of simultaneously agree and disagree with you here.

Are managers at fault for all problems? Intuitively I would very much doubt that’s true of any project anywhere.

Are managers responsible for all problems? It depends on the environment and level of autonomy but.. kinda, yeah. The first rule of leadership is that everything is your fault.

You kind of have to pick which one you want to define “to blame” as here, but I’m tempted to stick with the latter, if only because I don’t know of a lot of managers that had guns put to their head to take the job, and my own experience tells me that the pay disparity usually covers it.
That's quite a statement to make. Though, my previous employer definitely has been intelligent about surviving recessions, and they seem to be following along your words. Got any more evidence?
I was very surprised by the Wheel of Time reviews (they were almost entirely racist) because I thought the casting was great in that show. It was an eye opener when I finally looked up “what other people are saying” after I watched a few episodes.

Obviously for RoP, Amazon is hoping to avoid the WoT review mess.
I got an ssl error and then a "FortiGuard Intrusion Prevention - Access Blocked
Web Page Blocked" on a free wifi, my 5g provider lets it through.
I have a CS degree, and the main thing I developed that stuck with me is the ability to pick up most any programming language and separate the syntax from the fundamental concepts such as objects, functions, loops and flow of control, lists, arrays, other data structures, etc.

Pretty much every class in my degree program used a different programming language. You had to develop the ability to learn a language and be productive with it in a semester (~4 months) or at most an academic year. Sometimes you'd be learning two new languages along with the course material.

The CS theory I use far less. I think if you are in a job that boils down to implementing CRUD functionality (even if dressed up a bit on the UX side) you don't really find yourself thinking about CS theory very often.
So a future movie about the Ukraine war is perfectly fine if Zelenski is portrayed by a very talented black woman and Putin by a Japanese drag queen?
It's just a bad title. Choosing a guaranteed 1M instead of a 50% chance at 25M isn't particularly dumb.

"Dumb" decisions might be playing the lottery, or spending a windfall instead of saving it. But even those dumb decisions have reasonable psychological underpinnings for the person doing them.
Hydrogen is difficult to work with.
Mostly. Binaries of that era took everything on the command line. The config system would generate that from files and keep the running binaries up to date via ssh.
It's a matter of taste.

Some like deep mythology.

Some like having their politics stroked.
I am aware of this historical reality, but note that I specifically mentioned a Jewish camp inmate. Now, you might say that it's entirely possible that an Ethiopian Jew, somewhere somehow, was caught in the Holocaust's net and shot by Amon Göth, but let's be honest, we would be verging on bad faith argumentation at this point.

Taking the example even further, what about a specific Jewish inmate whose appearance is solidly documented an in the popular imagination, such as Anne Frank?

Ultimately, some expectations are seen as socially acceptable, others are not. But there are always expectations.
> It feels like the modern world superimposed in a fantasy setting

I know exactly what you mean and I think bridgerton does a great job of it feeling just natural and normal. Acting seems normal in an alternate universe, this feels like what history could have looked like. So it definitely can be done well, but I think it's so much easier to have shows just ignore details and just take you out of it.
Efficiency is publicly discussed in my experience. Generally in the form of people suggesting it can solve all our problems (be they energy efficiency or bureaucratic efficiency) without giving much consideration to the ever-present pressure to be as efficient as possible even in the absence of serious shortages, because "scarcity" is why energy isn't already zero cost.
Site has no way to reject tracking cookies.
Oh... That was not my intention.

I meant it to be "direct" since i felt the other responders were not being quite truthful and tiptoeing around in their answers. IME, That is never a good way to help somebody when it comes to STEM subjects.
Crossing your eyes to look at something is normal. What's weird is that it's all at one focus depth, so your individual eyes don't need to refocus on things that should be at different distances, even though you're still getting the depth signal from crossing your eyes.
This kind of be-all-end-all solution always fails. Some years ago journalists in the US loved to tell coal miners that they should "learn to code" when the mines shut down due to Washington politics. How hard could it be?

Did this even happen? I cannot find any articles in which miners were told to learn to code. I think instead those miners were offered vocational training, which included coding. This was in 2017.

maybe this is what they were talking about

https://venturebeat.com/entrepreneur/dev-bootcamp-shuttering...
100% I’ve never seen Gitops implemented in an organization that has been successful. Most devs just do get it and shoot themselves in the foot with it.

This gets into gatekeeping in software. “I’ve built this perfect system and if you don’t get it you’re dumb” or “we just need to create a culture where people do this stuff”

These are unhelpful ideas in an organization. We should be meeting devs where they are and empowering them. Most devs don’t have time to fully understand infra and for 90% of use cases that should be totally fine.

Learn from Golang and Python. You don’t need a perfect system, what’s most helpful is to have a system people understand and can use to produce value.
And that’s exactly how dystopias are created. People give away their privacy feeling like they have nothing to hide, up until the point that they really need it back when it becomes a tool of oppression and espionage, but by then it’s already too late. Corporations love to downplay these risks and make it seem like avoiding their road map to vendor lock in and proprietary, subscription based software is for people wearing tin foil hats.
There are certain areas where using proprietary software is too difficult and improvements are needed. I don’t advocate for a Stallman like approach. All I am saying is there are enough great open source tools out there that you don’t need to pay for a proprietary editor at the very least.

There’s also a bit of hypocrisy at play when you care about making your own projects free and open source, but you don’t want to support the developers building free and open source tools by using their projects.
I don't completely disregard the user reviews. It helps me get a feel of the type of movie or series when comparing it to critics review. The Gray Man has low critics review but high user reviews on rotten tomatoes. So i expected it to be something i can enjoy without too much of an investment. And it did. Helped me get through my 14 hr flight
Or change the language. Instead of 'generalist', sell yourself as a senior developer, architect, lead developer, etc. Nobody asks "what programming language are you an architect in", because the job is supposed to be much broader than that.
It's like cleaning old painted metal with a scouring pad; You want to clean thoroughly enough to take off the grime, but if you scour too long or too hard you'll end up taking off the paint itself. You'll always either leave a littke dirt behind, or take off some paint, never perfection. You could strip all the paint and repaint it, but that's so much more costly in terms of time and materials that it's a whole different task.

And the argument that more stringent anti-fraud protections increase the burdon on legitimate claimants is absolutely spot on, and has parallels in all sorts of other legal, financial, and market situations c:
Show HN: Hurricane Path Prediction Using LSTM
College project I picked back up and improved.
Implementation in PyTorch, better results than NHC models as reported at : https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/verification/verify8.shtml
Seems like a completely trivial sum of money for a key professional tool?
> Russian actions are arguably very localized to military targets

I don’t think anyone believes this.

Your comment is whataboutism at a grand level. It is possible to oppose slaughtering people wherever they live.
"Western" was probably used with its economic meaning in mind, as a synonym for "Developed".
Excluding design this is me and what I enjoy doing.

I named my operation "engine ignite" because I like helping startups start.

I LOVE getting folks leveled up on team process and procedure to support SOC2 and such.
I agree, even with FP and (some) Haskell experience, customising Nix and debugging what's going on is made hard by Nixpkgs being a complex codebase more than anything. However, it is different than the usual large web app. The problem of packaging software is fundamentally easy to break down into tiny pieces, the package definitions themselves. Arch's PKGBUILDs were very easy to understand for me as a novice, much better than RPM SPECs or whatever Debian has, so I think it's not impossible for Nix-equivalent packages to be similarly simple.

The biggest barrier, as I see it, is not actually Nix or Nixpkgs code, but the way NixOS differs from every other Linux distro. Most of my delving into Nixpkgs has been motivated by getting something working that would be trivial in a traditional distro. I agree the Nix language is a red herring, what's really needed is to make work other than "adding a package to Nixpkgs" easier. Actually usable introspection tools that the GP mentioned would be great.
I have the Avegant Glyph, which is fixed, and I it is uncomfortable. It's natural to move your head to change your view, but that doesn't work with these devices. In practice I use a Quest instead, but even Daydream was more comfortable for media consumption.
I have fond memories of the thriving shareware/freeware game scene in mid 90s Finland. It was a legitimate cultural phenomenon, like demoscene to which it was closely related. Titles such as Auts, Wings, Turboraketti, Triplane Turmoil gave rise to a genre of their own, luolalentely or "cavern flying". Split-screen (and shared-keyboard) multiplayer was, of course, the way to play all of these. Other legendary titles of various genres include MineBombers, Tapan Kaikki, Liero…
"In physics terms, the world economy is a dissipative structure, just as all plants, animals and ecosystems are. "

This reminds me of (spoiler alert)

"Origins" book of Dan Brown.
You can witness people buying lotery scratch cards every day in the UK and wonder why people are so dumb given the odds of actually winning a big prize.

But then bear in mind that this person maybe has a big bill to pay and only £5 to their name, do they keep the £5 knowing that it isn't going make any difference or take a wild chance that will?
Didn't we already have peak oil in the 80s? Anyway, if an analysis of the worlds respurces starts with "citizens can feel" I have a hard time taking it serious, this is about numbers, prices, distribution, transportation and the like. It is about how energy markets work to come up with prices. It is not about how people feel.

That being said, gloval energy markets are screwed up right now, Russia is doing everything they can make it worse. And it is among the asiest way to generate clicks and traffic, after all we are still somewhat in the summer whole of news cycles.
Gaza and West Bank are almost entirely autonomous. They are self-governing with their own civil administration, police force, school system, etc...

Israel controls, to only a limited extent, their international borders until a final peace deal is signed because there is a constant missile smuggling operations going on, with those missile being fired across the "border" into Israeli cities.

People need to start advocating for a peace deal, and stop taking "sides".
If that was true, as I told you, then there would be no reason to pay for the "IP". You can have an old wizard in grey clothing for free.
This article is primarily a lot of empty handwaving. It doesn't back up the headline.
The rational behaviour is to make everyone press the green button and then give away a million dollars to anyone who didn't get a prize but the obvious problem is that no such thing happens. Instead of cooperating some people insist on getting the full 50 million dollars as if they deserve it and were destined to get the money while the plebs who didn't get anything also deserve to stay poor.

In other words, the problem is that humans are cruel to each other and peace of mind vs other cruel people is worth more than a higher reward.
Chase is limited in that they can only lend to well-qualified borrowers who wish to borrow from Chase on terms Chase deems sufficiently profitable.

In other words they are limited by the demand for loans by well-qualified borrowers. Well qualified is defined as borrowers with sufficient collatoral, income/debt, and credit history.
Glib, Gtk+ and various Gnome components were still running in Maemo and MeeGo.

N9 was released in 2011, by that time Nokia was already dead.

Trolltech was acquired in 2008. Nokia could have have a modern alternative to iOS and Android from day 1 but they made the terrible mistake of reinventing the wheel and trusting Gnome.
The same as VR, which is to say... none at all?

Obviously the lenses make it seem like the virtual image is several feet away, so in terms of focusing it's no different from an actual object several feet away. If anything, it's probably healthier than a computer monitor that sits up closer. Plus, these glasses would actually be better than a VR headset in that the lenses can be designed so that the focal distance matches the virtual screen distance perfectly. (In VR, there's a mismatch for most distances.)

The only thing you might have to worry about is interpupillary distance (IPD) -- the space between the OLED displays needs to be adjustable to the space between your eyes. E.g. the Oculus Quest 2 has 3 settings for this, while the Quest 1 had a smooth adjustment. Adjustable IPD is essential, so I'd assume this either has it or they'll sell different versions for different IPD's?
Looks really cool but I think they are being overly ambitious with how much they are trying to do.
What kind of insecure loser you must be to have these kinds of opinions about other people's tastes in art.
Submitted this a couple of days ago, but it’s relevant reading: https://www.gmb.org.uk/news/amazon-workers-ready-strike

“Amazon workers at a Coventry warehouse have voted they are ready to take strike action over pay. More than 300 workers voted in the consultative ballot at the fulfilment centre in the West Midlands, with 97 per cent saying they were ready to walk out.”
They are not alienating their "core" audience - they were never the major target audience.

The reason why most of the Marvel TV shows, Star Wars, Wheel of Time, Rings of Power, Halo etc. all appear to be "dumbed" down is because the target audience are teens and young adults. It's the "catch them young" tactic - all these streaming services are competing to get teens hooked to their streaming services. The next gen spend more time hooked to their screens than our generation. And we "oldies", having seen tons of shows now can't be so easily thrilled with a new show. But even if a show is a damp squib, teens can still be excited by certain elements of it as it will be a new experience for them. Generate the right emotions, and you have them hooked ...
I thought you said 10-30 hours but maybe I misunderstood what you meant. You definitely said you're not required to work 40.
The same Dan Brown who wrote books about the Illuminati and black holes being thrown out of helicopters above the vatican?
Makes sense. I was just making sure I was not missing something or that it was not quietly added to a recent addendum/revision of the PCI spec.
You are not going to like what I’m going to say but I think the reason they rewrote so much of it is simply that the books are not particularly good in the first place. The ideas are very interesting but that was mostly kept. The prose and characters are rather poor and the stories mostly serviceable. I do wish there was less violence and more focus on trades and exchanges however. That would have been a better show.
most people have a tough time getting goods jobs. it's not uncommon for many people to apply some a single mid-salary opening.
Aren't there laws in the US that prohibit car companies from owning dealerships?
I think NASA missions are ideated, planned, and executed on the scale of 10-20 years. The first re-launch of a booster by SpaceX happened just over 5 years ago, in March of 2017.
For once I did read it before heading directly for the comments. Empty handwaving sums it up pretty well. Eitubsome click baiting for good measure.
Launch has been officially scrubbed for the day :(
12,500 / week for general work (design, prototyping, sometimes building). Startups won't pay this, but large firms will.
For sure. This is why I think there is a definite ethical element to the kind of automation we are inventing. Not to say that automation isn't inevitable, but I don't think I would feel good about myself pushing the process along.

And yeah, non "AI" tech is still automation, but at least the option to be a programmer without having to be a genius with Tensorflow is still there.
You're making the mistake of thinking money means anything.

Economics is a thin veneer we put over thermodynamics to make accounting easier.

Whenever the thermodynamics doesn't work economics stops working either. The 1970s were a short period were thermodynamics were sub-optimal. The dark ages were a longer period.

Money is ink on paper or bits in a computer.

Neither of those things runs a tractor or lets water flow.
Forgetting fundamentals is not normal, at least that is what I thought.

Responses in this post is changing my perception. No wonder, recruiting is hard.

I have found a knowlge of OS, computer organizaton, digital logic, networking, compiler design are crucial. If you are into datascience or ML, math is absolutely essential. I don't know why so many people think forgetting fundamental is normal.
It depends on what is meant by "scrutinized".

FTZ and DAZ and any other methods that are certain to introduce errors can be accepted only inside a computation for which there is an independent way to verify the results and that way is always used, without exceptions.

For example, it is indeed OK to use FTZ and DAZ when solving a system of equations, if, and only if, after obtaining a solution it is inserted in the original equations and a residual error is computed, this time without using FTZ and DAZ, and an excessive residual error triggers an appropriate means of notifying the user about the failure.
I would be surprised if it’s fixed - gyro based head tracking is very well established tech now. It’s probably 3dof tracking. (So no translation, just rotation.) the Oculus GearVR and Oculus Go took this approach which works fine for most people for sit and watch theater use cases.

Edit: oh, yeah so I think you’re referring to 3dof. I could imagine these being fully tracked but thought you were suggesting entirely untracked.
Fuse.js is a powerful, lightweight fuzzy-search library, with zero dependencies
Aside from reading, most of what children are observing are 3D objects in 3D space. Reading comes right after the developmental stage when children have mostly full object permanence and consistency. They finally understand that the same object can be viewed from many different sides, flipped around, turned upside down, and still they are the same thing. Except in reading!
> The universities don't have it backwards, you do. Computer Science fundamentally isn't Software Engineering. If you have a degree in computer science and a job in (some particular subfield of) software engineering, it makes quite a lot of sense that the degree and the day to day aren't perfectly aligned.

The university that I went to (Riga Technical University) didn't quite have computer science and software engineering as two completely separate degrees. Instead, we had separate IT (basically sysadmin oriented stuff) and computer science degrees, the latter of which includes software engineering.

Currently the title of my Master's degree is: "Professional Master Degree in Computer Systems and Qualification of Programming Engineer"

Similarly, the title of my Bachelor's degree is: "Bachelor Degree Of Engineering Science in Computer Control and Computer Science"

I know that many believe that the theoretic aspects should be somewhat separate from the practical ones, but to me it felt like most people could probably benefit from a bit of both - so that the research you do isn't completely detached from ways it could be applied, and so that the day to day programming you do doesn't end up disregarding things like O(n) complexity or even the theory behind how software costs increase due to mistakes made in the earlier development stages.

Then again, we do have specialization in the form of "Academical" and "Professional" degrees, the latter of which involves more course work around practical development and working in a company, whereas I think the former involved more research (though of course anyone could submit articles for peer review in the "Applied Computer Systems" journal).
It seems they are deprecating their standalone code review tool Upsource in favor of the code review tool that's integrated into Space.

Upsource is nice because it allows opening a review for a set of commits which aren't necessarily continuous. This way, multiple people can work on the same branch at the same time, and open a review for their respective commits afterwards. You don't need to wait for your coworker to have their review approved and their branch merged before you can start building on their work.

As far as I know, the other popular review tools (e.g. Github pull requests) only support reviews for entire branches.

Does anybody know another review tool which allows commit-based reviews as Upsource and Space do?
Ugh. This not only makes Boeing & NASA look bad, it makes the whole country look bad. The global general public is not going to be understanding, especially with all the PR bluster. Engineers may be sympathetic to the immense challenges here, but maybe we shouldn't have hyped this particular launch so much. The launch system is not yet proven.
What search engines want (2011)
I almost always build it from source. There are useful build options that you can use.

I do most of my work with LispWorks Pro, but SBCL is also a valuable part of my tool set. Much gratitude to the developers!