skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The point was that very few companies can pull off a clean sheet chip design from nothing. Google has done it, but Google is an elite company. So saying Tesla isn't the only company that has done it because Google has done it only shows that Tesla is doing very well.

But it seems clear to me that the point isn't to compete with these other companies, but to vertically integrate a critical component of their systems. They can discard a lot of legacy concerns and focus on raw power.

The thing is that if Tesla just uses Nvidia, like everyone else, then Tesla's stuff is only differentiated by software. Everyone uses Nvidia and it becomes hard to set themselves apart. But if Nvidia is chasing a broad customer base and has all this extra stuff to think about, then Tesla could potentially be more nimble, and produce a holistic system design that solves exactly the problems they have with no chuff. This could result in a more advanced hardware platform so their robotics products differentiate themselves with both hardware and software.

I am also happy because I am a robotics engineer, and in my opinion we need hardware that is 1000x more powerful than today to do what we really need. Nvidia wants to move at a certain pace, but if Tesla is trying to beat them on raw power, then Nvidia will play catch up and accelerate development of more powerful systems. This is great for everyone.
The advent of termites put paid to traditional New Orleans house designs that would passively cool. It looks like we are all in the same boat.
True, but blockchains only help if you have multiple copies of the chain. With one copy, there’s nothing stoping the owner from rewriting history. It’s why companies saying they’re “investing in blockchains” means nothing; DB replication/redundancy doesn’t stop a malicious owner.

So unless we’re all gonna start storing copies of HN’s database(s) on our home computers and phones, a blockchain won’t help stop abuse. Speaking of which, how big would said copies be?
The problem is that these estimates and projections often get converted into hard commitments by management.
Send 1000 copies of the same letter to the arbitration firm. When BigCo tries to get you to agree to combine the claims, agree to do so if and only if they pay out $1M to cover the legal expenses they are avoiding.
Hans seems like a cool guy, I watched his interview afterwards.

PowerPlayChess covered the game, it was a magnificent performance but also not perfect: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n27zd_dVtFw

Those saying it he got banned on chess.com, it was total bullshit, here it is of how it happened live on Han's stream when he was an IM: https://livestreamfails.com/post/84343

More info here, if he was really cheating he would have been banned for life. It was a suspension for 60 mins: https://twitter.com/boomer_chess/status/1566872068922265606

Alireza was also banned on Chess.com for cheating but there was none. I don't think HN crowd realizes how easy it is to falsely get banned on Chess.com, don't assassinate someone's character based on that: https://www.chessdom.com/alireza-firouzja-was-banned-for-che...
> Don't these both benefit mass arbitration?

Well, I think it's safe to assume they don't, given companies started adding these terms after mass arbitration became popular.

As to how/why they don't, I'm not sure. But if I had to take a guess, I imagine motivations could include: (a) clogging the arbitration system to slow claims down to a crawl (since they can't be handled en masse), (b) making it difficult for every individual to demonstrate damages (since many people will not be able to prove actual harm), (c) forcing every individual to contribute significant time and effort into the process (which will not be worth it for many people, and practically impossible for many others).
It relies on internet connection for alarming, recording etc. There is a local station selling for near $300, might offload for offline but not sure.
This is addressed by batching into same-sized chunks - the engineers discuss the work plan as a group and if you give yourself ten tickets that everyone knows are tiny and should probably be done in an afternoon, the group will ask you to group it into a parent ticket to make it a "half-day" chunk of work.
[ raises eyebrow at #1 and the rising crime within it ]
Do they have termites in the Middle East?
Because you (and others like you) are probably not a substantial source of revenue to Cloudflare. Big companies who are the bulk of Cloudflare's sales (and whom they spend >1.5x on courting than they do on engineering) would rather not be hosted on the same infrastructure that powers hate groups. Not really as a moral thing, but in the same way that e.g. Volkswagen or Samsung or Allianz would rather not advertise on a child pornography website, they'd also rather not host on an infrastructure provider who provide services to a forum whose members try to drive people to commit suicide, make bomb threats, fake calls to counterterrorism hotlines and generally espouse _extreme_ right ideology.
Another perspective:

Kanban doesn't forbid regular retrospectives. You can still pause frequently, reflect, and update your process accordingly.

The purpose of sprints is to try to estimate the completion of a release -- and as progress is made the drift from that original prediction. Sprints in theory let a manager estimate a team velocity. Together with estimates for the task in a release, that, in theory, gives one the ability to predict when a set of features (a release) will be complete. I have yet to see this actually work, but it could just be reflective of where I have worked.
I wonder why everyone focuses on electronic communication and wearable devices.

There are tons of acoustic side channels if an accomplice watches the live stream outside of the playing venue. Set up construction site and use a hammer just loud enough to be just barely heard from the inside. Bird sounds, music, the possibilities are endless.

Very few bits of information need to be transmitted for the best three moves.
It's about $50 for a Macbook Pro. And I have my music on 4 devices. Sure, I could throw $100-200 at music storage that I can't hear any difference in, but why the fuck would I? Again, this is golden-speaker-cables stuff.
It is a common issue. ETC was 51'd 3 times in a month not too long ago... that said, with the upcoming merge, it'll soon be the largest hash GPU/ASIC coin.

https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2020/08/29/ethereum-classic...
At this point it looks like anything and everything proves your point.

Being scientific like Galileo makes me the Catholic church, and being anti-science like the Church makes you Galileo. Why stop at Galileo, you are also Newton and Einstein too as you keep on opposing more and more science. Donald Trump is the greatest scientist that ever lived, if only dogmatic doctors had just injected bleach and destroyed covid19.
Politics 101: Claim that your enemy is a genocidal aggressor madman and is devoid of all humanity.

Real war 101: All sides commit horrible atrocities. Just stop it.
Chia Network explains the reason for the prefarm and how it’s going to be used in their whitepaper https://www.chia.net/assets/Chia-Business-Whitepaper-2022-02...

Also worth checking about Chia Network projects with WorldBank and InternationalFinanceCorporation for carbon credits market https://www.chia.net/2022/08/17/bringing-transparency-and-ef... about some real use that is launching very soon.
The point is making arbitration expensive. In order to set up the process by which Venmo will have to pay an arbitrator to manage 1000 claims, it costs the lawyer 1000 sheets of paper and 1000 stamps.
Memory Tagging: A Memory Efficient Design
Interesting on stripe's response to this matter. 'Debug environment spew leads to unauthorised api usage' - unfortunate and well worn. Like a good pair of slacks, it was simply your turn to wear them this time
I believe so! but try not to get too deep into it on HN tbh. Happy to discuss elsewhere though, my contact info is in my profile
All LGBT people are descended from straight people, so there is no reparation factor.
Alligator Alley is not an evacuation route?
Not sure I get this joke. What would you rather them do? Commute 50 miles in a gas-guzzling SUV?
A person might get the impression based on your comments that classes are somehow "for" CSS (they're not) and that using them for some non-CSS use is somehow "wrong" (it's not). Meanwhile almost everything you're saying here is opposite what the HTML spec says.

As I said in my (earlier) response to you: using the "class" attribute for semantic, non-styling purpose is not "overloading" or misusing it. It is simply using it. (Just like the folks who developed CSS were able to get use out of element classes by baking tier-one support for them into their selector language. CSS has no claim to the right and proper use of an attribute that predates CSS.) To argue against this is revisionism.

The HTML5 data attributes also aren't a replacement for proper use of the class attribute, either. What the class attribute encodes (surprise) the class that the content belongs to. The data attribute payload encodes a particular value associated with a given key for a particular instance (e.g. the testid payload from your own example). And aside from the use cases being incomparable, the HTML spec says they shouldn't be used the way you're saying.
This looks really cool! awesome work. Definitely think some of the pain points of python can be solved by this.
The mean of not platforming violent forums?
Kanye Quest 3030
For the first link at least, they seem to be talking specifically about parts of Palestine occupied in defiance of international law and agreements being returned to them, not Israel broadly being eliminated. Israel/Palestine border disputes are massively controversial, so I don’t dispute people do say things like your summary of the comment, I just don’t believe the comment you posted is that. In fact I think your summary is a bad faith reading of the comment.

Some of those other links are vile though.
I dunno about ambivalent. Tell a US person it's 30° outside in the summer and at best they'll give you a blank stare, at worst they'll say "well no it's gotta be warmer than that out." They don't learn it, so no one uses it. If schools taught it then it might catch on. The food labeling stuff is for regulatory reasons, the only metric units US people actually use are liters for beverages.
Doing an image search for "handwritten algebra" I find quite a few examples of ")(".

"I was taught the ")(" way at primary school" is a perfectly reasonable response to your question, which wondered whether it was just one person's preference. That answer tells you it isn't.

Nowhere did the reply suggest it wasn't regional, nor, for that matter, that "/ \" isn't regional. Both are presumably regional, but whether one is more common requires a fair bit of work to answer.
For god's sake, there is opus. I just don't understand, why people stick with their 90s codecs.
> In turn, the playing field was very tilted: you could see the person's current comp

No, you'll be able to see that now by looking up their current employers pay bands for their role. Previously this wouldn't have been available, except anecdotally on Glassdoor.
Ah ok, if nobody is being persecuted here, then I don’t understand why you insinuated it.
Make sure to read the part about Ascensionism.
Unfortunately arguments like these are meant to deflect and then nothing gets done. It's almost always a tactic to undercut, not advance meaningful measures.
Guess what would happen if Amazon would just block certain type of traffic.

US gov or the CIA/fbi just forces AWS to do so.

Since Snowden not unreasonable.
Real answer, by preventing effective regulation like:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_producer_responsibili...

> an environmental protection strategy to reach an environmental objective of a decreased total environmental impact of a product, by making the manufacturer of the product responsible for the entire life-cycle of the product and especially for the take-back, recycling and final disposa
Well they seem to be offline now, so I think it worked.
Froissart’s Chronicles, the lay of roland or any other chanson de geste, piers plowman, the canterbury tales, de rea metallica, on divers arts, gawain and the green knight, …

possibly too early, late, or religious: beowulf, the anglo-saxon chronicle, the chronicles of matthew paris, shakespeare…
Isn't that SSSD? I don't know myself... just asking because sssd is a... daemon... or at least nominally one?
Yes but that's anecdata against statistics, studies and theories of mind.

I am also 44 years into an uninterrupted career in CS and networks. I still believe it's a strong indicator of skill and ability to have the maths chops I don't
Java is an outlier here. For most languages the process of dockerizing a codebase involves learning a separate tool (Docker). As someone who knows Docker, I get the temptation to say "who cares, just write a few lines of Dockerfile", but after talking to a bunch of developers about our container-based tool, having to leave their toolchain to build an image is a bigger sticking point than you might think.
Time to hire 100 interns for a couple weeks. Presumably the proceedings are all more or less the same, so you only need a good lawyer to work it out once and an army of low-paid helpers to repeat the recipe book 990 times.
We can, but we prefer to use way cheaper and faster methods because before the "ancestral" building is finished, with our modern methods, we have built, used, torn down and rebuilt several times.
For most music, it's already very difficult to notice any degradation at 128 kbps with modern codecs/encoders.

You have to know what to listen for, and even if you do, why should you care? It's a small price to pay for being able to store several times as much music on your phone, or for saving on bandwidth while streaming.
But they can't arbitrarily mistreat customers. Which is what the ToS is about.

And I'm merely reminding OP that companies, as just a group of people with a common goal, have rights too, because OP seemed to have forgotten that. I'm not out here shouting it in the drive thru line at a Wendy's.
Assuming that someone has saved the source, you'd have to track them down. If it was work for hire, like say at a fruit company, that person probably doesn't have the rights to it. So you have to go to the lawyers. The fruit company lawyers might not actually be able to verify that the fruit company owns it, but if they want to try, it will require some effort to find the documentation, which will be somewhere in dead tree-based archives from the 1980's if it exists at all.

Which is to say that if you can identify the rights holder and it's not an individual, you have to convince them to spend time and money to release the rights. That they may not be able to easily confirm they have.

Or you could grab the binary and disassemble it and figure out what it's doing yourself.
> Through Brooks’ accidental-vs-essential lens, a lot of discussion around when to use Kubernetes boils down to the idea that essential complexity can become accidental complexity when you use the wrong tool for the job. The number of states my microwave can enter is essential complexity if I want to heat food, but accidental complexity if I just want a timer. With that in mind ...

I'm twisting my mind trying to grasp this interpretation in Brooks' complexity paradigm. I'm sure Brooks would be interested to learn there exists so called wrong-tools that can reduce essential complexity to accidental :). I think Brooks would put it that the essential complexity is the same and irreducible, but the accidental complexity is increased when the wrong tool is used.
"A Pattern Language" was published in 1977. It has only been in existence for slightly less than 50 years. When it was published it was simultaneously a revolutionary and also completely niche book. It did not build on any kind of existing sub-discipline of architecture, and most architects ignored it entirely (an awful lot of them still do).

It took several decades for anyone to notice that there might perhaps be some interesting way to take what Alexander had done in the context of architecture and urban planning and apply it to software development. That did not happen "over 50 years" ago.

The reason why "the discipline always seems to be architecture" is because there are no other disciplines that are (a) synthetic (in the sense of being about creating something that did not exist before, rather than analytic) and (b) have an existing magnum opus that describes the patterns that humans have used for centuries to practice that discipline.

The sciences are not a useful parallel, precisely because they are analytical. Various artistic practices could be useful analogies because of their synthetic nature, but the practice of art is widely held to be a matter of personal self-expression, and hardly a place you'd go looking to find "best practices".
Depends on the custodial setup!
It is quite a different paradigm from regular web programming - I can remember the mental shift I had to make when I rebuilt my homepage as a clone of the classic lander game (I was actually going to build a clone of an old Amiga game called "Gravity Power", https://www.richardson.co.nz/ was as far as I got!)

Did you use a game engine? These will often encourage you to follow a particular pattern when writing code. If you didn't, then I'd encourage you to look into entity component systems (which I also used for my homepage). It's quite a light weight pattern and it really lent itself to programming in a game loop (as opposed to say, MVC which fits the request/response cycle of web programming better)
It's not on sci-hub yet?
The executable piece is nice, but not the whole picture. Configuration and, more importantly, isolation of the runtime, are also huge benefits that come with containers.
So what. None of that is relevant to the current situation. No one is under any illusions that the Ukrainians are all angels. But as long as they're willing to do the hard work of killing Russian soldiers, it's best to continue supporting them as that protects the rest of us in the long run.
A website is a street corner
The difference is that murder is not prone to sybil attacks. You could literally mass-automate doxxing and swatting if you wanted to. Like imagine that you just had a bot that just scraped PII from a website, purchased phone numbers off the DN, and then used text-to-speech to call in a bomb threat. You can conduct this attack anonymously from the other side of the globe.

In order to murder someone you would physically have to visit them and try not to get killed yourself. Anyone can defend against murder, but literally no one can defend against swatting. There is literally nothing you can do to legally prevent yourself from being swatted.
Since burning forests to heat homes is not sustainable nor renewable (at a timescale that makes sense), it's not a rational solution. What will they do 5 years from now (or however many years that all forests are gone)?
> Book A Demo

Oof
As to your second question:

> Some ROM drives are capable of reporting C2 error information along with the audio data and some ripping software can use this information to determine whether the retrieved audio data is valid or not. A standardised mechanism for ROM drives to report C2 error information is documented in the Multi-Media Command (MMC) standard

https://docs.linn.co.uk/wiki/index.php/CD_Ripping_Terminolog...
I know this is tongue-in-cheek, but one of the reasons why the Taliban was tolerated in many areas is because they had very comprehensive courts that took cases quickly and gave justice swiftly (but probably not very fairly).

There is a story of a taliban fighter who had stolen from a local. The local opened a case at the local taliban court. Judge agreed with the local and whacked off the fighters hand right there.

Anyways, Samsung v Owner in a taliban court would be entertaining for sure.
What would "access to due process" look like to you?
This uses the same control surfaces as a v-tail RC airplane ;-) . I built one like this, fairly simple controls using an aileron mix (as elevons) to combine the traditional aileron, elevator, and rudder controls. Note that you can find a lot of RC projects like this online under keywords like "RC flying wing plans".
What would the point be of storing a checksum of the original data if the compression technique is known to be lossy?
This is quite similar in concept to a spreadsheet product from 2008, called Resolver One, which ran on IronPython.

https://media.prleap.com/image/221/640/share_trade_screensho...

It was excellent, and a bit of a shame that it didn't get more traction at the time.
I've never personally seen that on a dedicated player (appliance nor software), I assume because they are more interested in keeping the music playing.

Exact Audio Copy shows it but will spend minutes re-reading the same frames: https://i.imgur.com/ZGozdhz.png (screenshot mine, unfortunately)
No, containers give you things that static binaries just don't. How do you specify the maximum allowed memory for a static binary? The ports it opens? The amount of CPU usage? The locations it will access from the host file system?

Also, how will you distribute this static binary? How do you check that the result of a download is the specified version, and the same that others are downloading? How will you specify its name and version?

By the time you have addressed all of these, you will have re-implemented the vast majority of what standard container definitions and registries do.
> That seems if anything to reinforce the idea that this is unrelated to welfare?

I don't recall claiming that it was because of welfare. I'm merely providing context to one of the earlier posts — a number of people on government assistance are constantly trying to take the site down, the admin notices a pattern with the DDoS attacks, and speculates it's because that aligns with when government assistance is paid out.

I am not saying that his speculation was true, but it makes significantly more sense if you understand why he may have come to the conclusion.
My experience backing up up audio cds with Exact Audio Copy tells me that CD players have limited error correction facilities and using EAC is the only way to know! (read retail CD brand new get same as reference checksum, read same CD ten years later, mismatch errors popup on a few tracks), the FAQ on EAC gives some details on CD player capabilities - standalone audio CD players use oversampling and more but most don't tell you when it kicks in - there's typically only one small LCD/LED line of display.
https://www.exactaudiocopy.de/en/index.php/support/faq/