skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Neither of which help me on my android phone or my Linux machine...
>1Password’s desktop app is much worse than it use to be all while each platforms built in capabilities are getting better.

I keep reading this but as a user of 1Password over the past decade or so, the functionality hasn't changed much. I'm confused as to what they're spending all the VC money on because these re-writes haven't done much but in terms of functionality, I think it's best in class.

What am I missing?
> because of massive defects or barely producing due to a lack of cooling water

This is false, and not the reason for the (currently) low load factor of nuclear.

Most reactors are off for maintenance, like they are each year in autumn, in order to be ready for the peak demand that winter is. This year might be slightly worse, but it's not unusual at all.

There is also no lack of cooling water. There is only a law that was set many years ago that can be changed without any impact on the safety of the reactors, and this law is limiting only for a few reactors a few days each year. Very anecdotal.
The point was that growing meat is an extra multiple steps on top of everything you just mentioned
most scientists

But scientists aren't in a single domain, they're cut up into biology and physics and etc... And they're further divided into specializations, and then specialties...

And if we don't discount that they're human, they have families, careers, friends, and nations. And at this point we're talking about a pretty narrow cross section of the population, even narrower when you take into account the few that publish, and minute when you finally arrive at who among them can be counted as prime drivers.

And what would the geopolitical consequences be if an objective finger driven by unanimous assent pointed itself at some culprits? All the deaths implicated in the disease, all the destruction, the damage wrought economically - they're culpable for it all. Would it be war or sanctions? Could it be handwaved away?

There's a lot of reasons, at scale, that such data is better kept quiet, and long lists of lots of individuals in many high places which immediately evince one of conflicts of interest if we do take it for granted that it was a fuckup.
prohibit using JOIN statements is really cargo cult :-)

Join is simply an index scan. And is guaranteed to be cheaper then the ORM having to send many request to the server.
For those curious according to this source https://what-if.xkcd.com/130/ an Aircraft carrier produces about 191 Megawatts an hour

Unfortunately there's really only one county on earth with a substantial aircraft carrier force.
from the founder of 1Password: would love to learn where you think it is worse.

1Password 8 has a ton of new features and it is faster than the previous version. Some of the new features like Universal Autofill and SSH Agent do not exist in any other product. It also fixes many problems that accumulated in the app over the years.

More on features here: https://1password.com/products/features/

a more visual description of what's new is here:
https://1password.com/mac/
this ^

https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Dollar_cost_averaging
Strong disagree.

There's a shit-ton of money riding on that being an answer as companies like Nestle are looking to create vertically integrated markets for nutrition. These huge conglomerates created the sickness of feedlots, etc to kill the labor unions, and are now peddling the cure for the problems they created to you - eat shittier fake products with most of the downsides of the original process.

It would make more sense for heath, economic development, national resiliency and other reasons to invest in small scale agriculture. You'd also see the market address the health issues, as higher prices would reduce consumption.
Elo gives expected outcome in points, not wins. If the formula says ~1/4, it means you should get ~1/4 of the points, not ~1/4 of the wins.

If Hans were to score 1 point off Magnus in a 4 game match it would be far more likely to be be by drawing twice than by winning once.
Burnernote code is FOSS if you want to investigate how it works. As for IP addresses, you are probably aware of TOR and VPN's if you want that additional layer of obscurity.
Ah yes, the classic attacking of the author instead of engaging in a debate on substance
Any domestic transaction requires OTP. Any international transaction by default requires OTP.
Oh the days of buying PCIe expansion chassis to get the cards required to fit into your system. When 3 slots were not enough, boom, now you have 7 in just twice the square footage and twice the power needs.
> need to come with gigantic storage projects.

Was what I responded to.

Do you think Texas has anywhere we could store some hydrocarbons?

I don't even think that report is optimistic enough, Green Hydrogen production and EVs as demand response and some grid connections will solve the issue cheaper, but I don't want to blow anyones mind, so you've got to meet them halfway with an in-depth accounting of how the vast majority of Texas energy use could be renewable with ease at a low cost.
I think on desktops most users have enough io, and on laptops the Ultrabook type trend is not particular to and or Intel.
>Seems like the opposite has happened

Only for outsiders.

In the industry you realize it's cutting corners and the end customer has a worse product.

There was a short lived perception that Tesla was doing innovation, but as the quality issues came up, it appears as cutting corners.

Tesla has a marketing effect that companies dream of. That was likely what confused industry insiders of innovation. That has been gone since ~2018.
> People infected with SARS-COV-2 had more than three times the risk of dying over the following year compared with those who remained uninfected

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7...
We’re also running gas plants more than normal for this time of year and exporting the electricity generated to mainland Europe as our gas interconnecters can’t keep up with demand
And "consent" to shutdowns were manufactured by policy makers inside governments paying media companies to promote their policies. It was a concerted effort.
Have heard of Clasp a few times, looks like they hit 1.0.0 back in spring which is cool. May be time to finally give it a try
A text-based 'Oregon Trail'-style game could be built out of this concept, where the player starts with a fixed sum of money and has to buy enough donkeys and food, plus perhaps plan a route with optimal water and grazing potential, to reach their destination.
My thoughts exactly. I mean.... I wouldn't be surprised if it turned out to actually be magnetic fields, but at this juncture that seems speculative at best.

"Correlation doesn't imply causation, but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing 'look over there'." https://xkcd.com/552/
abadger9, nice username, do you have any cool portfolios ref the same kinda work?
Agreed. I have been watching this as well a bit, esp as the startup I'm now working at is working in the "hosted WASM" area. But it still seems early days. And not clear if their goals correspond to mine (WASI doesn't fit their/our use case generally, but a lightweight component model for WASM does).

Probably I should watch this more closely, or see if there's a reasonable way I could get involved.

I still think there's a long rough road to "get there from here" in the context of the browser though, which has already defined its own (non-capability based) security and component model. Luckily what I work on right now doesn't involve the browser.
I've been out of the loop for a while but...

> OpenTelemetry Protocol (OTLP)

> OTLP

> OLTP

I'm going back to bed.
Haskell Horizon Platform: Nix-first build plans for ghc-9.4.2 and beyond
They could try and replicate most of the keybase features. Use FOSS to market it and sell a hosted version.

That is the only direction which I think could charitably use this $100m productively.
I'd been under the assumption that the CVC is on the other side on purpose so that it doesn't allow seeing all card details at once. But I just got sent a new credit card, and all of the details - card number, expiration, name, CVC - are on the magnetic stripe side.
Thread unrolled: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1567047646929379330.html
https://github.com/pipebird/pipebird
Hi, content aside, tweet chains posts are terrible to read on any device. And twitter bugs me to log in to track me through the browser.

To all the people who think this is the best way to deliver information to their audience please stop.
1/1
Wonder if they could have raised the yearly sub or added a tier to make that instead?
What do people without smartphones or cell phones do?
Funny, because all the data and research shows the opposite.

Read this:

https://ofdollarsanddata.com/even-god-couldnt-beat-dollar-co...
The differentce is that Bitwarden is 100% open source (clients and server).

If they do something stupid, I'll run one of 2 OSS servers available and it's done (or have someone else host it for me).
I think you are doing it correctly, you just need to break that iceberg into smaller chunks. You’re getting caught up in the ideological nonsense that surrounds TDD and Scrum. “It can categorize a single transaction correctly” should be translated to a problem statement, “I want to be able to categorize a transaction.” You must then brainstorm feasible solutions for this or different aspects of the problem, develop the spec for implementing that, in the form of tests, “able to do this, able to do that,” and build the solution. Then afterwards you can test it against some examples and ask yourself, does this solve the problem? How to improve? Come up with a change or completely different solution, rinse, repeat. I would say a general statement like categorize a transaction is difficult because you don’t have any specific examples. Come up with a list of a dozen transactions that need categorizing and your TDD experience will become much less frustrating.
Ethereum Merge: ‘Most important moment in crypto history’ begins
There are tools for live migrations for most popular databases. Also a lot of Postgres DDL is very fast and/or capable of happening live.
For signal, telegram and mattermost, I am not too worried since their protocols are documented. Matrix support is planned and should not be too much of a problem either.

About the full-proprietary platforms like messenger and discord that are actively against alternative client implementations, it's probably going to be hard to keep this working by myself. I chose to rely on 3rd party libs for this very reason. But even if these slidge plugins break, I'm still happy to use my XMPP clients for the more or less opened networks.
Certainly for some nationalities getting visas is harder than others. Though I'm not sure what would even constitute proof beyond passport immigration stamps and you don't necessarily always have those. Most boarding passes these days are either just printed out on a printer or displayed on an app. I'd actually have a pretty good record going back maybe 20 years with TripIt but that doesn't seem as if it would be considered authoritative.
That’s the spirit, but it doesn’t work like that. You can’t time the market without information.

Most of the time, in the long term, investing a lump sum beats DCA even if you buy at a previous peak.
I've been using FreshTomato, which I got pre-installed from a seller on ebay, but IIRC DD-WRT has better support for some Broadcom chips because they allow binary blobs which have better hardware support.
It's part of the mandatory security requirements coming with the EU directive regarding PSD 2.
Imo: Effortslessly different passwords everywhere. So if one of your passwords is leaked, you don't have to change passwords for all accounts.
The secondary school I went to in Germany made students clean and rake the outside areas. Though with a class of around twenty it never took longer than an hour.

I never inquired why we did it, not expecting a straight answer anyways. I suspect it had more to do with discouraging littering than any deeper character lesson.
What do you want to do? the errors were made in the past. The only way forward is to normalise the relationship instead of further escalating this very dangerous situation.
Sorry, you have trouble reading. Death is not the issue.
Occam's razor is not a dousing rod for the actual truth in complex situations. It's a tool for dismissing wild claims in the face of the very obvious.
Right, it's fine, and is a pretty basic macro. Doubly linked lists are pretty basic data structures too, even the Rust versions once you figure it out. I like your sibling comment making it look like the CL version. I still want to know in more detail though why you think that doing things this way instead of the CL way is less likely to be "fragile and break down" for the complicated stuff, it would help to have a specific complicated example to showcase. Perhaps the linked https://github.com/disconcision/fructure in another comment would be a good study? The author there claimed they might not have been able to manage with defmacro, maybe someone familiar with both could articulate the challenges in detail. Is it just an issue of some things benefit a lot from pattern matching, and if so, does using CL's Trivia system mitigate that at all (in the same way that using gensym+packages+Lisp-2ness can mitigate hygiene issues)? Or is it more when there's a point of complexity where you need to do code walking, and this is more straightforward in something like Racket?
> If you read the papers that claim natural origin, these turn out to be extremely weakly argued.

What didn't you like about Pekar 2022?
New EvilProxy service lets all hackers use advanced phishing tactics
Accusations is all it takes now and companies will drop you left and right. Should inform users that it is not only important to backup your data, you also need a backup infrastructure.
Pay the monthly fee for 2 months, then if you like it go annual. Assume you like it, you are going to be using it for a year anyway.
Personally I am for bathing babies in pie, so :thumbsup:
The problem is that human lives are likely to be lost over this precedent being set.

This isn't about 1 website here. This is about the precedent.

Every time cloudflare gets bullied into taking a website offline, it is ammunition that an authoritarian government can use against it.

What happens when one of these countries starts to threaten cloudflare employees lives, to force them to take down some human rights organizations' websites?

Maybe it won't happen tomorrow. But every time a mob forces cloudflare to take these sorts of actions, it weakens cloudflare's ability to fight against the real threats.

If you want to stand by your opinion in this, then fine. But I get to hold you responsible for the deaths that happen, if cloudflare is no longer able to stand up against these greater threats.
Frustrating, no. Half the people in the US couldn't afford food if the costs weren't low. Paying subsidies is a way to keep labor costs low while keeping people fed.
That towers remind me Fresco's hydroponic farms.
... all of which you have to do when growing plants you then feed to animals, too, so it's still an apples-to-apples comparison.
>It's about a separate personal desire to regulate supposedly risky research.

Referring to: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2015.18787

So a paper on a lab-made coronavirus related to SARS that can infect human cells from Wuhan on topic about the origins of a coronavirus related to SARS that can infect human cells that caused the pandemic from Wuhan, is a separate personal desire?

>It's about a completely different study that didn't result in any pandemic.

Because after the article was published, Wuhan stopped working on this, right? Or is expected China (or any other country) publishes everything related to something delicate as this?

Seriously this "rebuttal" is anything but excellent. The ironic answers to good remarks makes it even worse. Sounds more like trying to evade the ~~points made~~ info given rather answering them.

As for the papers, origins of pandemic and origins of virus are distinct things. So, yes, we can all agree that evidence shows that pandemic started in the market, and as virus can infect animals sold there, this points towards that virus came from animals. But genetically is there anything that can distinguish a natural from a lab-made virus?
Well, there is the problem, isn't it? If people aren't willing to pay what amounts to a cup of coffee a month for a service they rely on daily, how are companies supposed to build a sustainable business without raising money?
Dollar cost averaging works when you have a steady stream of income that you're contributing to your investments and you have a heavily diversified portfolio.

The reason being that, over a 5+ year investment horizon, a total US market portfolio will average about 6% after inflation.

However, going off of empirics, dollar cost averaging is less preferable when you have a single lump sum. While it's possible that you 'time' the market wrong with your investment, the odds that you'll happen to invest immediately before a sharp down turn are lower than the odds that you'll miss out of rather significant gains by not being invested.

This all assumes that you have a diversified portfolio. If you're trying to invest in single stocks, good luck.
If we take them at their word that they're committed to keeping a fully-featured free version, what options do they have to make back a multiple of that $100 million for their investors? What many other companies have done in the past is to add a lot of new features. There are many examples of a simple, no-frills application turning into a bloated, complicated one, with a tiered subscription system. Ultimately a less streamlined, more expensive version of what it was before the funding.
It is considered a more genuine take, yes. When posed as a series of questions as such, it is meant in a sense to lead while initially posing as genuine curiosity. To level set, genuine and very general curiosity is maybe the most typical feature that holds this community together.

IMHO A more genuine approach would be to list the key points and why they are compelling to one of that persuasion. Or alternatively, to more directly take a position: "I find the lab leak hypothesis compelling, and TFA/primary objection's don't explain <fact 1> or <observation 2>" etc.
> The the first part of the Merge, known as the Bellatrix hard fork, was scheduled to take place at 12.34pm BST (7.34am ET) on Tuesday, 6 September, with the second and final part of the Merge taking place at some point between 13-15 September.

Ignoring the typo at the beginning, the penultimate step has now completed:

https://cryptoslate.com/bellatrix-upgrade-goes-live-before-t...
Obviously the cancellation mob only has reach to a limited number of targets, like KiwiFarms. If Keffels or someone like them did in fact highlight someone and contact their employer I expect that this would have results.
Unfortunately it's an obscure topic because people have been so dependent on laptops and phones that few people know about the regression of desktop PCs.

Here's a simple example.

I found an old i3 PC from Intel in my house that was left by one of my son's friends. The CPU is artificially limited to 16 PCI lanes.

You might think you could plug a discrete GPU in, it only uses 16 lanes, but no, some of those lanes are consumed by storage, USB ports, super I/O, etc.

So this computer is e-waste now because it can't be upgraded to keep up. This kind of delinquency is only possible because Intel has pushed barely-functional integrated "GPU"s.

Back in the 1980s and 1990s you had to know some rules about how interrupts were assigned to slots to build a working PC. Since the early 2000's, PC builders face a number of barely documented rules about how PCI lanes are assigned which boil down to "i3 and i5 are e-waste, buying a budget or mid-range motherboard is a waste of money because upgrading your machine will be a matter of 'you can't get here from there'"
While no irking took place, it's also the case that even "commenters" would be more information than what we have. It could be the study authors who realised it, or publishers, or reviewers, or commenters. That would be some information.

But we can get lost in technical subclassification, when saying something is written in the passive voice is not the most precise term, even when it's obvious what is meant. Strunk and White, and the countless people who've used their rules of thumb, have helped popularise common ways of identifying why communication is unsatisfying or vague, and how to fix them.

But you saying pot calling the kettle black is also shallow. In no way was the comment written in the (right and true, or Strunk and White) passive voice, which would be the correct way to deploy that phrase. If you want to disagree, then do so, but don't hide behind a (wrong) idiom. That just makes a hot potato look like a piece of cake.
Pokémon Game Emulation via Neural Network
KeePass is the free, open source, light-weight and easy-to-use password manager
Interesting. Can you explain how that’s different than the normal internet/ hosting solutions currently available?
> both your worldviews regarding work coincide neatly, and do so specifically in favor of only one person in the equation

I disagree with this. I believe I have a mutual agreement that benefits myself and my employer. If I felt like I could complete my job in 30 hours a week instead of 40, I could have a conversation with my employer and negotiation for a shorter work week. If that didn't work, I could find a part time or flex job.

> a hypothetical worker of the future could very well look at us now rejecting the 4 day workweek the same way we look at our predecessors justifying child labor and black lung

I agree that people will look back and think it absurd that we stuck to a 40 hour work week for so long. Progress should be making our lives easier and demanding less of us but that's not what's happing for most.

The way we make this better, in my opinion, is by being honest about it.
If someone fakes it with a mouse jiggler to make it seem like they're working 40 hours when they're not, they're actually helping keep the 40 hour work week alive.

But still, we're talking about people lucky enough to have a fakable job, not people doing real work. None of this applies to the person working the drive thru that can barely make rent on a 40 hour work week and would be underwater if reduced to 30.
This doesn’t convince me because we have a recent covid-related example of scientists making a significant mistake and admitting it: namely, the primary means of transmission. At the beginning of the pandemic, the scientific community argued that transmission was surface-based. As more data came in, it became evident that transmission was aerosol-related. This was a huge mistake with significant implications, but nobody tried to cover it up.

I conclude that scientists are more truth-motivated than you assert.