skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Because end users use multiple operating systems these days.

Do end users commonly want to copy programs between OSes, or will they usually just revisit the project's website and download it again? My feeling is it would be the latter.

And if we're talking about running multiple OSes on the same computer, is it common to share filesystems between those OSes? It's been a while since I ran more than one OS, but trying to do that wasn't remotely pleasant.

I think this is a huge technical achievement, and I do think there are some use cases for it here and there, but I personally don't see a big benefit over just using a CI system to automatically create a build for each OS/arch combination at release time.

I also wonder about the trade offs involved in using a different libc. As an example, when I was looking into musl, I realized that it didn't use NSS (unsurprising, since that would defeat the whole zero-dependency static linking thing), and therefore had no support for multicast DNS (well, not that NSS is required, but they also didn't, and had no plans to, integrate mDNS support of their own). I've pretty much abandoned using musl (and Alpine for containers) due to random quirks and gotchas like this that end up biting me somewhere down the line.
Gorbachev secured his place in history by what he didn't do. While never endorsing the end of the eastern bloc, he made it clear beginning in the late 1980's that unlike his predecessors, he would not oppose democratic reforms in Eastern Europe by force. To general astonishment, he kept this promise, and with the regrettable exception of Lithuania this commitment to not repeating the crimes of his predecessors is Gorbachev's greatest legacy. In 1988 you would have been hard pressed to find anyone who could imagine the mostly peaceful collapse of the Eastern Bloc, but Gorbachev had the moral courage to accept this once unimaginable consequence of his policy and to see it through.
I wish people would stop saying this. Hooks aren’t functional or stateless.

Literally, calling ‘useMemo’ twice returns two different objects, because the function keeps track in internal state of how many times it has been called.

Hooks are very deeply imperative.

They are a way of obtaining some benefits that are easily obtained in functional programming via higher-order functions, but expressed in a way that makes them easily consumed in an imperative code body.
How weird that your experience is so incongruent with everyone else’s reports. Do you think you got a dud machine, or do you think you’re running software that others aren’t, or otherwise using your machine differently than everyone else? There’s got to be a reason for your experience to be so different!
People are complicated beings. He was a part decent man, part criminal and part coward.
AMD allows the user to set the TDP for their CPU. The branding they use for this is "Configurable TDP" or "cTDP". You can set it in your bios, or possibly using some AMD-specific cpu tuning program directly from windows.
Gorba, the Chief.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNoBstt8uYM
I guess it feels so good when you get all the benefits and somebody else foots the failures.

Well, 2022 is a year of boomerang.
In python since 2.5 (and im sure other languages implemntations) the compiler/implementation recognize this += use case and implement it as a fast one.
Back when I used Windows and played MMOs during the Vista or 7 days, I used AHK to do all sorts of grind-y tasks in-game. For example, grinding professions in SW:G to try to unlock Jedi (game might have survived if you could just pick Jedi classes from the start, just saying ...) and similar painful mechanics in most MMO(RPGs at least).

I did use PyUserInput/PyMouse to "play" Universal Paperclips one time on Linux. Similar, though not nearly as featured, to AHK.
I was not talking about good results, but about people's reaction. The artistic vibes that the v3 model offers are nothing but clever pre- and post-processing, when the SD-based model comes out it will give you similar vibes.
You're right about that. At the end of the day it is a tool in the craft domain of art. Artist take a long-ass time to perfect their craft end of the business, but ultimately what sets great artists from mediocre ones is not craft, it's their taste. Own (good or bad) taste pushes artist to not stop working on their image/painting until their own taste is satisfied. Same will happen no matter the tool. I am actually terribly excited by these tools to expedite sketching, not in a sense of speed as much as volume while hunting for those directions that satisfy that inner taste.
Not to mention pretty much every health condition you look up will list that you have cancer or some mental illness.
I don't think so either. However, I have seen the argument made many times that opinions originating from particular political ideologies should be suppressed (which is a solution I recognize you have stated some qualms with), because of "bad faith actors" spreading misinformation virally that is too labour-intensive to debunk.

> Scientific method

Undoubtedly: and such teaching
suffices on a subject like mathematics, where there is nothing at all to
be said on the wrong side of the question. The peculiarity of the
evidence of mathematical truths is, that all the argument is on one
side. There are no objections, and no answers to objections. But on
every subject on which difference of opinion is possible, the truth
depends on a balance to be struck between two sets of conflicting
reasons. Even in natural philosophy, there is always some other
explanation possible of the same facts; some geocentric theory instead
of heliocentric, some phlogiston instead of oxygen; [...]

- On Liberty (1859)
Curated technology leadership and management articles from around the web
The same thing that attracts so many to his podcast is what drives so many away: his lack of a political agenda. Many people find it refreshing that Rogan can talk (mostly listen) to nearly anyone without pushing his (or anyone else's) agenda on them or acting as some sort of policeman to attack those with views that various groups of people don't like.

Unfortunately in today's environment, many people (most of the ones who don't like Rogan) think it is incumbent on everyone to be a wokescold. They think that having a conversation with someone somehow grants them legitimacy or "normalizes" their views, while intelligent people with coherent, well-thought out principles understand that legitimacy is not something that is granted through proxy.
I suggest you look at the external debt of China vs other nations, you may be surprised with what you find.
> It's trivial to stop and start in an automatic car as there's little difficulty involved and no actual driver energy expended

There is car energy expended. A running car needs a lot more energy than a bycicle to brake. That's why the impact between a car and a bycicle puts the bycicle in disadvantage.
Reagan didn't end the cold war. He applied economic pressure, which created the conditions that allowed the cold war to end.

Gorbachev played the critical part. He let the East European satellite states go rather than sending troops to restore status quo. Within the USSR, his reforms gave the democratic opposition some room to breathe. Once Gorbachev's power started to fail, that allowed the opposition to win, rather than the hardliners who attempted a coup.

With another kind of leader on the opposite side, Reagan's policies could have won but not ended the cold war. The USSR could have become something like North Korea, but much bigger. It would have been stable but no longer a global superpower. (That may also be where Russia is headed today, as there are no viable alternatives to Putin's regime.)
Consider management or software sales.
Mikhail Gorbachev, last leader of the Soviet Union, dies at 91
He really changed the world. Ended the cold war, an incredibly important figure in 20th Century history. One of the few decent people in Russian politics.
Are you responding to the right comment? That's sort of unrelated to the GP's remark (that Ronald Reagan can be credited with ending the Cold War).

(It's also hard to assert that generally: Russia is by many metrics worse off than it was under the USSR, while most of the rest of Central and Eastern Europe is better off.)
The governor has to request it.
Even if that’s true, Ken White’s Rule or Goats applies: “[s]lightly paraphrased — for this family newspaper — the rule states: If you kiss a goat, even if you say you’re doing it ironically, you’re still a goat-kisser.”
Pretty wild how a site that bans people for hate speech sponsors so much covert hate. It's even encoded into many of the popular memes on the site's front pages.
As the Russian, I'm of the opinion that Gorbachev is traitor.

I hate communism, so it's good that he helped us to get rid of that.

But why getting rid of communism had to include letting Americans to take reign in many government agencies of Russia?

What would be your opinion of US president, if he goes to to retire in Russia?

I'm reading some Russian news site, and almost universally Gorbachev is hated by Russians.
Most of this discussion is a "cars are bad and drivers are evil" circle jerk, so I'm compelled to point out that when the tables are turned, cyclists are the bigger assholes.

I routinely take walks on a "multi use" path. It's intended for walkers, joggers, roller bladers, skate boarders, and yeah cyclists. The cyclists are the only ones who yell at people they pass. It's a park, no cars in sight. And these Lance Armstrong wannabes wearing their logo covered shirts (as though they're sponsored) can't stand to be inconvenienced so they bark at everyone else. God forbid they should have to slow down and re-accelerate to avoid hitting someone who is walking, so they pretend that it's the walkers who are dangerous. Entitled fuckers.

I've been yelled at and threatened by cyclist more times than I can count. I'm tempted to carry bear spray with me because these aggressive jerks frighten me. So yeah, fear breeds hatred, and I hate them.

I have zero sympathy for cyclists on the roads, because I know how they act on the sidewalks in the parks. This isn't new, and I've seen this in multiple cities in different parts of the country where I've lived.
The main thing is that actual free speech isn't possible on Twitter, otherwise it'd be free speech to create a million bot accounts to spam the platform.
I'm saying that you can't know the reality, nor can you know the reality from what is presented by the media. You seem to think you can discern something useful from what the media says. I'm saying that all you can notice is when the media is pushing a particular narrative, you don't know the underlying truth. Unless you have personally verified it. And no one does.
You could probably do it pretty easily for some dialogs, i.e. those drawn by some framework or other. But good luck doing it for all the other frameworks too. Your thought is probably the most effective...
I meet your skepticism with a video of him telling the joke: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQh6q9gNCIQ
Podcasting was around long before the iPhone. There's a reason it's called Pod casting.
It is somewhat ironic that I can actually write this on an iPad using Scribble nearly 30 years later and after Apple killed the Newton, reinvented its mobile devices, and declined to add a stylus to them...

Incidentally, it recognizes "egg freckles" just fine.
It's like I said: Rogan has had guests that I consider to be cranks. But Rogan is completely transparent about the guest list being people he finds interesting. That's not a high bar. Therefore, I don't outsource my critical thinking or judgment of character to Joe Rogan.

I do feel for Rogan here...he's doing more-or-less the same thing he's been doing since the start, but now it's "wrong", because other people are expecting him to behave in a particular way. He builds an audience by being a good conversationalist with a huge variety of different, sometimes nutty, people, and suddenly uptight folks expect him to be Walter Cronkite.
Like Bill clinton, he helped define 90s geopolitics. It's remarkable how he faded away like he did. Nelson Mandela, Yassir Arafat , Ariel Sharon..that whole era.
> The United States didn't do enough to help Russia transition to democracy in the 1990s.

Some how people manage to blame everything on the United States.
Headway maintainer here. You don't need 10T of nvme storage unless you want to try and build tiles, a routing graph and a search index for the full planet without using a deduplicated filesystem. Eventually I hope to eliminate the need for deduplication but that's not currently a huge priority, since most Headway users don't run full-planet instances anyway. To my knowledge I'm the only one who does. Most people just run a smaller instance for their city.

It's not the same as OsmAnd obviously because it runs in the browser but it does try to fill the same niche. Also 64G of RAM for building the planet is a tiny machine! We don't know how good we have it these days. This used to be completely intractable for mere mortals. :)
> but Gorbachev seemed like a fundamentally decent man

I caught this movie at the Tribeca Film festival: https://tribecafilm.com/festival/archive/meeting-gorbachev-2...

It was very sympathetic toward him. And I don't think it is a "great" film in any sense. But I did feel like I got a taste for who he was. And I also felt he was a fundamentally decent person.
React will rerender the child component anyway in this case even with useCallback. Of course you can prevent this by using React.Memo on the child component, and in this case using useCallback makes it possible to optimize rerendering by providing stable values for functions you pass to that component.

Adding useCallback for functions only does something useful if you also React.Memo those children. So while this is a very important optimization, it's not one you need to apply to everything.
Not even remotely close to the competitor's pricing. HughesNet would go out every-other-week, by comparison Starlink has been startlingly stable.
Federal what? The Russian federation? Also, why are people constantly attempting to compare a website to a square in a town?

(for those not reading between the lines: most of the world doesn't live in the US, and most of the world also doesn't assign special privilege to town squares, digital or otherwise)
I always wonder how a Newton would perform on modern hardware. Considering how well the handwriting recognition worked on 90s hardware it should be pretty great by now. I definitely miss it. The iPhone feels like a step backwards in terms of user and developer friendliness.
Hi! I have been working on this project for a few years now, and decided a few months ago to start over again.

Since the project was re-launched almost two months ago, many things have changed: The contents were revised, the examples updated, and new sections were added. The website was also completely redesigned with support for offline navigation, a dark mode, instant search, and a few other improvements.

I wanted to hear back from the community and find people who would be willing to help contribute.
Er. Windows has Portable Apps (especially of https://portableapps.com/ fame, but also in general), Mac happily lets you run most things directly from the DMG without "installing", GNU/Linux tends to favor going through the package manager but lots of people just build and run from source and there's absolutely nothing preventing you running a static binary in place. Everything most certainly does not need an installer, though I grant there are sometimes benefits to having one.
That's a very serious claim, could you please provide some citations?
Sadly, any start-up tool firm can't have any other business model other than subscription.
This time tho its because the euro is going up. Was 0.99$ the other day.
tbh your suggestion would confuse me as well, i think the scope or better said usp of ahk is more specific, and the proposed description could very well mean bash or other comparable tools
> I don't know the specific numbers, and I've only just seen one or two studies

You might as well cut you comment at this point.
I was wondering about trademark issues with a model that can draw new pictures of Mickey Mouse/Homer Simpson/Hatsune Miku if prompted with their names.
I think there's a lot of historical support for this view. Here's a summary from 1998:

https://www.thenation.com/article/world/harvard-boys-do-russ...
In DE there were some ciclists who lost their driving licence for speeding while riding a bycicle so i wouldn't hold my breath.
I am not critisizing you, I am giving my own review of what the AI you are using has or hasn't accomplished in this case!

I agree that you manually editing to be better written wouldn't have much purpose. I think the point of this exersize is probably "See what an AI can accomplish?" I was reviewing that.
A dictionary probably won't give you a useful definition for most of those terms. They're jargon.

But then again I would add (3) they're just buzzwords that don't actually tell you anything...
Yeah no, it’s definitely the price and the hassle of getting a ticket. I probably live in the best developed area in Germany, public transit wise. I could be in the next big city center in 10 minutes by train, but without the €9 ticket I frequently took the car (which I have to have for rural reasons), because apparently rather than paying €12.40 I preferred driving 30 minutes, finding and paying for parking, and not drinking. Because it’s not just paying 12.40, it’s figuring out what ticket to get, being shocked by the price, calculating a thousand and one fare options to try and penny-pinch myself to a clean conscience, dealing with their fucking ticket machines or their fucking app, begrudgingly committing to a time and a train… Hating every part of it and feeling hated back by Deutsche Bahn at every step of the way, knowing they’ll readily fuck me over if they find the tiniest excuse.

The €9 ticket got you around without playing stupid games. The same freedom is either unavailable otherwise, or comes at absolutely unjustifiable prices.
that video is 12 years old. As far as I can tell every episode back then was a bunch of wasted/high comedians talking sht to an audience of basically themselves
It was a compromise back when we had 28-year copyright terms. It has been chipped away almost entirely from one side.
Unreal this amount of hate toward a man who does not claim to be an authority on anything and happens to have a popular podcast.

Don't like Rogan? Don't listen to him and leave it at that.
So you really believe that denying any and all hierarchy to knowledge is rhetorically useful? Newton's laws of motion and Phrenology equally voratious? You can have this opinion but it doesn't seem compatible with building a society. Why should a people trying to support a functioning society take such anarchic philosophy seriously?

> the truth depends on a balance to be struck between two sets of conflicting reasons.

This is terrible reasoning, for the opposite reason you seem to be arguing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma
Republicans have long said that the federal government is structurally incompetent and unable to effectively administer a large country. They made a convincing argument with their performance in Iraq and Afghanistan, and I doubt Russia would have been much different.
Sikuli works on Linux - http://sikulix.com/
Let me tell you why I think this is an inappropriate comment: The point of it seems not to be collaboratively extending the line of thought proposed by the original post or the parent comment, but to make the parent commenter feel some kind of personal shame or stupidity. Good commenting is more like a team sport than a martial art.
Thanks for a link to a site labeled "free propaganda". It really rang true here, it is propaganda, and it is free?

Do read the comments on youtube.
My late grandfather was a really good and kind man. He never argued or blamed people.

The only person that I remember that my grandfather had really negative feelings for was Gorbachev.

I never learned why.
[Remove the two spaces before the link to make it clicky.]
The blades are made of composite materials that involve some sort of epoxy binder. So heat would be important to avoid. Composite aircraft are white for that reason.
The adventures of Spacecow and Starpig
OP is saying top podcasts are not MSM.

But to address the point I think you're making, just because two shows have different viewpoints doesn't mean they're not the same- 'Fox and Friends' and 'The View' might have opposing ideologies, but they're the same show.
The situation seems to be: inept local govt refused to pay for services they are responsible for providing because they didn’t want to raise taxes.

So, they begged for outside money (again, for something that is their responsibility) and when that didn’t work stuck by their “do nothing and blame the state” strategy which ultimately created a humanitarian crisis that leaves federal taxpayers on the hook.

Did I miss anything?
One of the complications of this is that it's very hard to hold the switch on certain types of terrain. Objectively, well over 80% of that terrain is situations where you have no business running a lawnmower in the first place, and so 'good!' is mostly the correct response to such complaints. But it's still a pain in the ass in other situations, like cornering past bushes.

Me, I just don't have grass anymore. Fuck grass. It's a bunch of bougie bullshit from a line of the French Aristocracy who ultimately wound up with their heads in baskets. Maybe we shouldn't be copying them.
well that is transistor count, not transitor per square centimeter which can't be measured because it is variable. the top chips are simply bigger
That’s not the fundamental question.

The fundamental question is: Why have owners?
*That* is exactly how I discovered Coast to Coast AM in the 1990s. It was late at night, I'd listened to all I could stand from my collection of cassette tapes, and I just hit "scan" with my radio set to AM.

These days my unlistened podcast collection is large enough that I rarely get to that point. And my unlistened podcast collection is that large in part because the radio dial is a little bare lately when I hit "scan" in most of the places I'm apt to do so.
Nightmare fuel? Yeah, just got a shipment. You're gonna be ripped bro.
Neither a lawyer nor American, my total knowledge in this area is recently listening to the podcast The Bayesian Conspiracy (168 – Unions Are Governments) which states that American unions are only allowed to act with regards to the relations between the workers and their employers and cannot engage more broadly in other political issues.

I don’t know American life, but I kinda assumed BLM was about the police and not workplace health and safety, and therefore it would be “other political issues”.
> He might be able to salvage the Soviet Union into something else, but instead most of it turned into multiple heaps of dumpster fire...

Wasn't he essentially removed from power by Yeltsin -- who did so by breaking up the Soviet Union?

My history isn't that great. But my understanding is that Yeltsin was the president of Russia, while Gorbachev was leader of the Soviet Union. By breaking up the union, Yeltsin put Gorby out of a job and essentially became the leader.

(Please correct me if I'm wrong.)
> these Lance Armstrong wannabes wearing their logo covered shirts (as though they're sponsored) can't stand to be inconvenienced so they bark at everyone else. God forbid they should have to slow down and re-accelerate to avoid hitting someone who is walking

The best part about this is that when these jerks are on the roads, they have no problem inconveniencing drivers in the exact same way that they complain about happening to them on the sidewalks.