skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sharing the current state of things is good. It will be stressful (for everyone) at times but at 7 people, they're invested personally and professionally.

Sharing things that are in-progress is harder. I'd recommend attaching timelines and probabilities. Basically saying "this should happen in the next X days" and "we're trying this idea, it may not work but we'll know in roughly Y days."

There are two huge upsides to a small, tight team:

a) there are LOTS of decisions made every day in every area. If people know what else is going on, they should be able to make better decisions. aka "This doesn't make sense to do for one customer.. but if there are 4 others in the pipeline, it's way more compelling."

b) people with varying strengths and areas of focus will not have your blindspots and perspectives and will see/understand things that you don't. Lean into that and you'll get a better solution.

Background: I was employee ~25 at Twilio, launched Okta's API security product, and am currently employee ~20 at ngrok.
"Be so good they can't ignore you."
Never in my wildest dreams would I have imagined people would be upset about not having access to what wal-mart stocks in-store vs. its web site. The shelves are largely stocked with cheaply made chinesium junk as it is!

Try buy a can opener that doesn't bend on first use or a wooden spoon in your local wal-mart, I dare you. It's just one step above DOLLAR GENERAL from where I'm sitting.
How so? GDocs’ diff presentation looks great to me: https://images.ctfassets.net/lzny33ho1g45/2t3YHSACJY4iGfxWYL...

In fact, it does one better than GitHub by showing edits by different users in different colors.
PostScript Control Structures (2003)
Northern China grows plenty of rice. Heilongjiang is currently China’s top rice producer (the southern provinces grow more in aggregate of course).

https://www.statista.com/statistics/242360/production-of-ric...

However the seats of power are more centered around Beijing in the south, where not much rice grows (though today you can find some rice farming in the area).
You should share enough context that your employees have a good grasp of business goals and can shape and prioritize their own work to build value. You won't think of everything and you don't want to spend your time tracking all their work - they need to be able to make independent decisions that further your business.
game streaming has more problems:

- you need to fund expensive hardware

- you need to fund the games

- you need to fund the future games

- you need to fund new hardware

It require more investment than video streaming, not sustainable
Technology needs more buttons – and that’s why we love the Stream Deck
Exactly. The only fixed-pitch instruments in an orchestra are the piano and the percussion section.

It was routine even in my high school brass section to pitch down the major 3rds.
> This is almost impossible to control. The amount of staffing and expertise needed to do this at scale across all product styles and segments is just impossible to maintain.

I’ll try this excuse next time I break a law, and see how far it gets me. “Your honor, keeping track of so many laws is just impossible to maintain!”
I'd say the number of people willing to take a 5x paycut (it is literally 5x) for feeling better about themselves is pretty small. The number of those people who are qualified to work on matching algorithms and pricing algorithms is even smaller. And you need matching and pricing algorithms to compete against Uber and Lyft, because they can price discriminate (e.g. airport rides) against consumers and get better utilization out of drivers, so if they have to compete, they can pay drivers more than you.
would connecting the ventilation shafts exclusively on the lower levels create some kind of draft ?
To be fair: if you have hundreds (or even tens) of developers that extra infra expenditure is relatively meaningless.
I see that this contains code that sends and fetch data to a lot of services for ads, tracking...
Prioritize. Pick one thing and start there.

I'd also ask yourself "Why do I want to be an expert specifcially?" Is this really just a manifestation of narcissism? Are you really after admiration and respect? Work on yourself. That's the best advice I can give you.
I don't understand this. For twitter to be what it is today a lot of centralized decisions needed to be made. I don't know how birthing it as a protocol and evolving it turns it into anything like current Twitter. And if he means Twitter should be a protocol _and different_ from it's current incarnation. Just go make that different thing?
It's pretty straightforward once you know what to look for, but I don't think I'd call it straightforward overall. It's halfway down the page, sandwiched between shipping and return policy, and doesn't show up at all on the search results.
Code density is a good one.

L1$ is always starved, thus it is always good to fit more code in it.
Got it, so it’ll be very different. Monetization will likely be affiliate links and ads, though I wonder if they’ll give float plane subscribers an ad free experience.

Also curious if they’ll be able to keep the firewall between marketing and review that it appears wirecutter has failed to do.
Aren’t clown cars usually driven off road? (Stages, circus tents)
The project of your soul is more immense and more important than expertise.
I was about to post the same link from Susan!
I found myself a lot in the post and made me felt like I was not alone feeling that way.
If you want to have a different policy, you can set up a domain with a different policy. If you have a few million dollars you can do this for a TLD, maybe .charcircuit.

But, you will need to figure out where your million dollars a year comes from. Maybe you could require a renewal fee... oh, right.

And you'll need some mechanism to clear out useless garbage. For today's domains the renewal fee does that, but you don't want that fee, so... maybe you'll pay interns to look at each domain, weigh up whether it seems "active" enough and if not delete it ?

How does an intern guess whether some.example gets a lot of email? Sends a lot of email but with its return address listed? Is mentioned in Java package names for important software? Has a fun text adventure hidden in its DNS answers?

Oh they can't do all those things (and dozens of others I didn't think of) ? Then your service isn't fit for purpose or you must commit to keeping absolutely everything, forever, no matter what, which has unlimited cost.
I usually don't do this.

As a counterexample (and they are science fiction works, not necessarily literature) I give you Anathem and Ridley Walker (similarly A Clockwork Orange).

They both make use of the same stylistic device of an invented language that you need to untangle and internalize, before you can seamlessly scan the phrases.

50 pages weren't enough for me to understand what the stories were about. I pushed through it and I found both highly satisfying and I enjoyed the language puzzle that they put in front of me.

It can be argued that it's clear that the stories did grab me before 50 pages, and that's why I pushed through, and maybe this is right, but I just wanted to clarify that 50 pages might not be enough every time. :)
Author here, I didn't conveniently skip over England. In terms of the Industrial revolution I have written about why England industrialized first: https://medium.com/lessons-from-history/why-england-industri...

But this story is not about the industrial revolution but about the fascination for machinery that spread around Europe in the 1500 and 1600s and which laid the foundation for the later industrial revolution in Britain. This story never gets to the industrial revolution as that isn't the topic I am covering.
It's fraud, of course it's a crime
There's a ton of good information here, but it seems to assume a guitar or piano, where there's only one key or fretted space for each note.

For a fretless stringed instrument, they are indeed different notes, and the same note within a single piece can sound different depending on whether the line is moving up or down.

If that sounds heretical: I got this from the Alexander String Quartet, in the Q&A session after their performance. They have a measurement of microtones (I think they're called "clicks" but I forget), and all four of them have to agree on how many clicks up or down from the center of the note they're using.
I think you misread previous comment.
Ask HN: What's your strategy to handle your phone being stolen?
I use an Android phone.
I keep location and mobile data ON when I go outside.(So that I can locate it / remotely wipe it). I use phone's default encryption. Both my sim cards are locked using PIN. What else can I do to prevent misuses/data leak if my phone gets stolen? Whats your approach?
But you have met two organizations that do kubernetes. Kubernetes may be overly flexible, but having everyone on k8s is a heck of a lot more standardized than having everyone writing their own bash files.
I use Thunderbird. Does gmail take notice of me moving messages to the spam folder?

(Question not directed at you specifically.)
> Assuming you're thinking of the same thing

Yes.

> are you suggesting that the compiler (or other static analysis) could catch all of the issues you listed?

Yes, the compiler for the first two and the standard library's heap implementation for the third.

> This path leads you to something like Rust

There are stops along this path before you get to Rust. If you just add the 3 things I mention above to a C like language, it would still be perfectly possible to leak memory. But that isn't a safety problem.

The 3 things don't include a borrow checker. You could still make doubly linked list and graph data-structures.
Every damn time. But until the issue is resolved, I will assume that button is just a NOP designed to make people feel good.
If you like the PinePhone concept and want to help the cause but also would rather wait for a more powerful model and/or for the software to be more mature, you can still help them by purchasing one of their other products. I bought a Pinecil solder iron a couple years ago and couldn't be happier: it totally deserves to sit just in between my other two Wellers.
I just contacted them on that email.

I sent them this submission so they reply here
Ars longa, vita brevis

"skilfulness takes time and life is short"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ars_longa,_vita_brevis
this doesnt just scam you for capacity, it will overwrite files to maintain the illusion of large capacity so you will lose data until you catch on that they are going into a bit bucket.
What was really cool was how efficiently stores those wings could be when not being used. The wings are so thing and delicate looking that you can see through them, yet they are strong enough to get the insect airborn

Really cool!
Fascism is alive and well in the big corporate America.
I've never understood this argument that to be a billionaire, it's required to destroy man peoples lives. There are plenty of people who got rich just selling their company. Hell, Notch (who is a piece of shit, but didn't have to be) became a billionaire by selling a video game. No murdering slaves required.
Twitter is a publicly traded company, which means it can be sued by shareholders if it makes business decisions which will harm its value. Giving up complete control of its protocol would harm its value. Giving up its algorithm which traps its users in a whirlwind of vitriol would harm its value, because its advertising dollars would go down. Dorsey might have been at the helm, he might have a lot of clout, but when it comes to making the internet or the world better in return for lower profits, most of the time the company leadership does not actually have the control we think they do.

The problem isn't that Twitter is a company, the problem is that they went public. Any promise or good will intention a corporation has ever had is null and void the day they sell the company or go public. I'm sure Dorsey will cry into piles of money over it.
I think Odin just doesn't do enough. The improvements over C are there, but imho too small to justify/motivate a large-scale change.

And personally I think (!) there is no reason to introduce a new programming language without RAII these days. If you don't solve memory management any more than C did (not), then you are ignoring the biggest problem that needs solving and every replacement that does address this problem looks more attractive.
This software is provided 'as-is', without any express or implied warranty

You're creating a distinction where there is none. Commercial software has the exact same disclaimer.
reading requires 100% focus. you can't listen to anything else. you can't use your hands unless you read off a computer screen, and then you still need to switch pages somehow, you can't move around either. people watch tv on a treadmill, but reading won't work because you need to keep the focus on the current line. reading while commuting with public transport works at least.

on the other hand listening opens up a number of other activities at the same time. i started listening on my commute. when that went away i discovered going for a walk as a replacement exercise and as a great way to get some listening time in. in fact because i want to get more time to listen, i end up going for longer walks.

besides audiobooks i also listen to audio drama and podcasts. i started with the latter. audio books came later, when i decided that i wanted to read more, and it allowed me to start picking up some books without changing my habits.

i love reading. i was a bookworm when i was a kid. i stopped because i got to busy and just would not find the time. i was also traveling a lot and didn't want to carry books around. if i pick up something to read now i loose track of time.
That's been his stance, a lot of the information and planning for the "Lab" have been exposed via their live Friday shows (WAN Show). They just got their power supply testing stuff, too. Linus seems to be really hedging on doing this right, and I'm cautiously optimistic.
Those laws are still put in place by elected members of Parliament, she just helps writing them down. The matter that is becomes law is not up to her exclusively, this isn't a dictatorship.
SDN in the stratosphere: Loon's aerospace mesh network
As far as I know it applies to both brass and woodwinds, though the degree of difficulty involved probably varies between types of instruments and also (at least on the woodwinds I'm familiar with) note to note.
i think it needs to talk to FTC ?
Wait 10-40 years for more progress with AI and brain-computer-interfaces.

The good news is that it will likely be completely possible to effectively be an expert in all of those things. The bad news is that everyone else will be an expert also.

It will probably be kind of like what has happened now with Google and arguments over trivia. Just 10 or 100 times more integrated and in-depth.
Pick one field and start practicing everyday, you'll be amazed what you can achieve on one thing in one year with even only 2hr daily practice.
I can't edit my comment above but I want to clarify: I don't mean to say that string players always play in 12-TET.

If you're playing a C in C major and I'm playing a G, it may sound best if my G is close to a perfect fifth from your C in just intonation. This is why string sections often sound so sickly sweet, like A Capella.

On the other hand, if you are playing a C and a G on the piano, and I'm also playing a G, then it will sound best if I play the same G as you in 12-TET. If I were to play the "correct" G against your "wrong" G, it would sound out of tune.

Context is everything.

As you may notice, G doesn't have a sharp or a flat in C major! If string players relied upon accidentals to tell them how to tune a particular note, they would be out of luck seven twelfths of the time.

That process of adjustment: called intonation, happens after resolving which pitch class I want to play. It's not something that an arranger can control through the use of enharmonic spelling, but it doesn't stop them from trying!
I think the OP knows this and thats why he has asked the community. So brushing off by a casual "duh, grow up" isn't the way to go

A few people I talked to in life, have this love for learning everything to the point they feel "afraid to die" before mastering something. They aren't Einsteins - they know that. But having that insatiable curiosity to learn something through & through. It is sad to be empathetic but also a revelation how passionate some folks are. And although its a terrible plan by design, it personally keeps them going on & on. I think what they need to understand is "how much expertise" is good enough. Finding inner balance is as important as finding expertise.
I apologize for offtopic-ness, but I have no idea what Mr. Jon Udell did to piss our censors off; apparently his website is banned in my country:

https://i.imgur.com/1m9LX0C.png

I swear it's so crazy the absolute random shit that gets banned here. Thank god for Tor, I guess, I was able to access the forbidden knowledge of...github?? brb about to create some social unrest.

----

Having read the article, I was curious how it could be utilized for everyday writing, tracking collaborations and stuff.

Maybe if you are doing editorial work, this could lead to controlling your workflow in a more cohesive way than docs? You have your text, I have my text, I don't lose my workflow behind your red tags.
Dinosaur Train doesn't get everything right. An untestable hypothesis is still a hypothesis. Even an unfalsifiable hypothesis is a hypothesis. But testable hypotheses are better then untestable (and unfalsifiable) ones because, well, you can test them to see if they are false.
Wow this is awesome data!

I wrote about this trend at some point last year btw:
https://rajko-rad.medium.com/the-rise-of-open-source-challen...
Yeah, my first thought what that it would be better to focus on what you want to do, rather than what you want to know.
Ok, I understand. Yeah, that's scummy.
The Walmart stores will sell items that make cost-quality trade-offs you wouldn't, but they don't sell outright frauds like this HD.
Ironically, I found it more fascinating at double speed. A bit more relatable, somehow.
Which is a dying breed, and furthermore running an orchestrator on top of another one (Nomad or Kubernetes on top of vSphere) is a terrible anti-pattern that wastes CPU and makes performance issues hard to debug due to the two layers.
Arguments are seldom "won" outside of something like a formal debate with point scoring.

Arguing with most people is like mud-wrestling with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig enjoys it.
From the horses mouth:

> I read through the discussion area for that story and found that the problem had been tracked down to an outstanding invoice for passport.com at Network Solutions, the domain name registrar.

> I own a number of domains myself, including doublewide.net, so I'm no stranger to the payment system at Network Solutions. I went to the payment page at https://payments.networksolutions.com and typed in "passport.com", after which I was greeted with a page showing the outstanding invoice for $35. One of the buttons near the bottom of the page was "Make payment", so I pressed it.

https://web.archive.org/web/20031002153020/http://www.double...
I did say "based entirely on just intervals". But as a composer I most certainly wouldn't want string players choosing their temperament based on whether there happened to be other instruments in the ensemble capable of the same. And it sounds off for music that doesn't largely sit in a single key signature anyway, which is arguably most music composed since Beethoven.
Though I did just read a classic example of where just intervals are often used is the opening of Das Rheingold, that sits on an E flat (not D#!) major chord for several minutes.
This seems to be a wrapper for the great content produced by Ant Lab: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWxiO_Br1awgEjy79VItspQ.

I really loved their most recent video with butterflies and moths taking flight: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCQoRpStF4M
I am curious, who needs to visualise these datas? What I am interested in is validation. it's the same as with XML, or any transitional data formats, if I need to fix something I work on a specific set of the data and make sure that it is valid. If it is not I fix it. If I want to visualize data I use it at the endpoints, ie. in Excel or in PowerBI.
One thing to realize is that the most relevant skills and knowledge are changing rapidly. So maybe it's better to be an expert in adapting to and adopting new approaches.

Because being an expert in less practical subjects that are slightly dated can still be useful and interesting but may tend a little more towards vanity.
Currently, this article is flagged.

Regardless of whether you agree or not, there is no reason to flag this article, unless you are doing so in order to suppress opinions.
Nobody understands C use fgets when he/she wants speed.

The whole point of C is the programmer decides the performance himself, not trying to the fastest. None of the popular languages consistently deliver this.
>What was broken?

<thing>
This same thing happened to me. I was trying to register an obscure domain name (never before registered), left it for several hours, then came back to find it snapped up. The chances this was done without inside information on my lookups are surely slim. And with all the personal stories flying round like yours, I'm also inclined to believe a GoDaddy employee (or GoDaddy themselves!) sniped it.
I used to be one of the aggressive weavers, and I think I was engaging in a very stupid attempt at activism - "I'll teach these slow sleepy drivers to wake up so we can all get to our destinations more efficiently."

Of course, that is completely futile and I was just being a jerk. Life is much better if you regard the other drivers as your fellow humans, and remember that we're all in this together. Being default-courteous has helped me be much more relaxed and happy.
Perhaps. My experience has been that people didn’t want to hear the ups and downs. Bad sales month? People start fearing for their job. It will depend on your team, but remember not all employees are entrepreneurs. Sharing downs and struggles will cause personal stress for many of them. I think most companies are closed info by default, and after running a company in both modes, I understand why.
The demo starts [here](https://youtu.be/AGHbxXXmnms?t=1208).
Paving Golden Paths on Multi-Cluster Kubernetes: Part 1 (The Theory)
It might be funny to outsiders, but it's a well discussed topic in the web 3 community so it's no surprise to them -- it is something that they are constantly warning about and trying to find ways around.

The funny part to me is that they used godaddy as their domain registry... like were they not around for all the godaddy bullshit over the past two decades?
I seem to remember there was a 3D editor, Moonlight Atelier, allegedly killed by lawyers for similarity to... SoftImage?
> system’s web2 bridge heavily depends on a centralized trust point

Yes, this is how it works. If you use DNS to access blockchain data you are routing through a centralized point that might fail like in the OP.

But the blockchain and ENS is unaffected, still as decentralized as ever, and anybody can query it’s data or build new providers on top of it. That’s how eth.limo, Infura, and others are able to provide infrastructure even when eth.link is down.
Only modified pages go into a version data file [1]

[1] https://github.com/sudeep9/mojo/blob/main/design.md
> "you would need to duplicate yourself each time there is a new thing you want to pursue"

Much easier than inventing a duplicator is to imagine you have done this already, and the duplicates are all the other people in the world, busy being concert violinists and working on cold vaccines. What a relief to find that you no longer have to bother with such things.