skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Your first link ( https://www.akc.org/expert-advice/nutrition/can-dogs-eat-gar... ) basically states exactly what the GP said about dosage:

Studies have found it takes approximately 15 to 30 grams of garlic per kilograms of body weight to produce harmful changes in a dog’s blood. To put that into perspective, the average clove of supermarket garlic weighs between 3 and 7 grams, so your dog would have to eat a lot to get really sick. However, some dogs are more sensitive to garlic toxicity than others, and consumption of a toxic dose spread out over a few days could also cause problems.

This means that if your dog accidentally eats something containing a little garlic, they will probably be okay, but intentionally feeding it to your dog is a bad idea.
Garry pushed a political agenda specifically for a tough on crime via punishment approach (in terms of policing streets, not so much tough on wage theft or other more leading crimes). You make it sound like it was some specific tactics that were the issue, rather than that the issue he's taking is with an ideologically diametrically opposed approach to addressing crime
WhatsApp’s shopping integration is the latest in its super app rollout plan
Fashion trends are currently rebelling against the understated 2010s by bringing the late 90s/early 2000s aesthetic back in the form of wider fits and louder colors. Makes me wonder if/when we might see a similar change in web design, or even furniture. I might be biased as a younger person without many memories from that era, but I'm all for some change (barring impacts to accessibility) if it breaks up the monotony of the corporate-lite graphic design trends of the mid 2010s.
Google would have fared better if only it waited a slight bit.
Back then the general attitude was “why would you want to film everything you see!?!” Now the attitude is going to be “Awesome this make my tiktok/reals/instagramming much easier!!”
And just like the early adopters of blackberries where seen as geeks and corporate stiffs while iPhone adopters where “on the edge influencers”, we’ll see the same playlist with AR and Google va Apple, because Apple cares more about user perception than tech, and Google cares more about tech than user perception.
> The Fed simply devalued the dollar to keep the cost of post '73 OPEC crisis oil down.

How does devaluing your currency lower the price of an imported commodity? Being the currency in which that commodity is priced doesn't help.
I'm seeing many people say you've blocked them without ever having interacted with you. Many have jumped to the conclusion that you simply block people who disagree with your politics. I don't tweet about SF politics, but after I tweeted this, you replied tell me it's funny but wrong, and then blocked me: https://twitter.com/sandofsky/status/1491167231467999236

Which is fine. I block plenty of people. I also mute people, because a block carries a message. And if I found myself in role that gets considerable scrutiny, I'd probably reevaluate my entire approach to social media.
Anything you can think of you will be able to find that content. We simply don't have the kind of censorship that China has. Comparing the two is ridiculous.
The writer's point is that AI will help artists, not replace them.
To

>> Are the AI generated images copyrighted?

you wrote

> No, this is already established in the US.

What cases are you then using to conclude this?

>It is not copyrighted by default anymore than any other trivial non de minimis effort

I doubt de minimus applies, since the images coming out of this AI are no where near any originals that I've seen - they may similar style, but they're so completely different that they are almost all certainly copyrighted by the author.

For example, the simplest, littlest effort to snap a picture gives it full copyright. This AI takes more work to use than snapping a picture.

And de minimis would be on the infringer to prove - the owner still has a copyright until proven otherwise. So the images are most likely copyrighted.

Anything copyrightable in the US is automatically copyrighted by default upon creation. It's why any photo taken is immediately copyrighted by the photographer. Any painting is automatically copyrighted by the painter. Any computer art is automatically copyrighted by the computer operator.

I'd expect most of these works are copyrighted just as much as if someone painted them, or used blender to make them, or used a collage tool to merge self owned photos.
are the post and your comment not mathematically equivalent statements?
This is tangential, but your opening statement threw me for a loop. As a Libertarian, I've spent a lot of time arguing with people on the left and right who are on the pro-censorship side when it comes to corporations. While it wouldn't surprise me to see a Libertarian take a position against individual liberty on this issue, I have not seen that happen. Your ire may be better directed at the ones in the driver's seat who have the power to address this and refuse to do so rather than the powerless minority who consistently get this right.
If you're done, emad already discussed this
How many people would you need, in order to build robots? Not many, and most of it'll be automated anyways. And remember the birth rate is not 0.0 it's 0.8. So I think fewer people will be there because we don't need more people. Society will change to accommodate to low birth rates.
The system of the Turkish Classical Music is a bit different:

* https://www.sufi.gen.tr/nota-sistemi/en

* http://www.turkishmusicportal.org/en/types-of-turkish-music
Installing Gentoo Linux on the M1 MacBook Pro
It will probably depend on if the AI has the original image in its training set..
As opposed to trying to determine if a person had seen the original.
> This added up to over one hour of deleted scenes, or nearly three full episodes of purely censored content

I would like to watch the edit of only deleted scenes strung together.
There's a lot going on behind the scenes that we don't see.

The bank is not wiring your money instantly. As I understand it, it takes 2-3 days for your bank to do the actual security confirmation. What Apple is probably doing is effectively floating you a line of credit assuming that the ACH goes through. And your bank is probably passing you along the transaction in a "pending" state.

There are a lot of security checks just to be in the ACH system. Ask someone who does payroll what it takes to set up direct deposit. Just having the numbers ain't enough even to put money into an account.

It's a bit analogous of how TLS/SSL work. Yes, you can just issue your own self-signed certificate. But that doesn't mean anyone will trust it.
>> The problem is people aren’t building great things, period.

Oh, I think they are. You just haven't seen them (yet?) and you probably never will, because their creators are slaving over perfection, somehow expecting the randomverse to spot it.

The winners are the ones who accepted imperfection, who were brave enough to show the incomplete, who were prepared to make the effort to do more than just write code.

VHS over betamax, Windows 95 over OS/2, Apple 2/mac over amiga. Our history is littered with marketing over product.

For every success there are 10 guys with a story about how their effort was better, how the winner was rubbish. But the winner always won the marketing game.

Too many coders are playing the perfect game of checkers, in a world where everyone else is playing an average game of chess.
Show HN: SaaS for analyzing Bitcoin price movements
Hello everyone!

Our software offers a SaaS for analyzing Bitcoin price movements. We built an MVP model which recognizes levels in which BTC is at the top or bottom of the cycle. It is primarily intended for investors who are not financially sophisticated as a possible help to protect their investment.

A short story about the creation of the product:
A few of us, friends and ourselves, have always been maddened by the regular loss of the largest part of unrealized profit during bear markets which tend to be very hard on retail investors.On the other hand, a lot of friends blindly invested into bitcoin at ridiculous price levels based on hypes, bad instagram and YouTube influencers and mouth of word.

We think that a large part of BTC and crypto investors live in a similar situation.

With this goal, we teamed up with experts in the field of data science and finance, and created an algorithm that gives the BTC price score based on crucial market parameters. This score shows excellent results in real time and on backtesting. Our ultimate goal is to create a platform with various features, which will help retail investors to better navigate through the market, and to protect them from large losses.

Therefore, we assumed that our USP has its audience among people who invest in BTC, and who had similar experiences in the bear market as we did. With the help of a landing page and paid Ads we want to test if a product market fit is possible with such a service.

Unfortunately this turned out harder than we though.
The problem lies in the fact the most popular social networks, among them Twitter as well, have problems with crypto advertisements. Although by definition we do not provide any financial product or services, not even financial advice, it may be that our service is interpreted that way and that we belong to a group where the space for marketing on social platforms is limited, rightly or wrongly. And we don’t know if we can change or adjust it at all, which drastically slows down our strategy of defining the product market fit.

With that, we ask for feedback or advises to the following questions:
-What do you think of our product? And do you think it is an idea that could be useful for BTC investors? If you don’t think so, how would you change/improve the product?
-Is our product, like it is now, considered as financial advice? And is there anyway we can differentiate this kind of product from such a label?
-How would you implement the product market fit strategy of our product in the fastest and most favorable way, if you could not publish advertisements on social networks?

We are very grateful for any constructive advice or idea! You can find out more on our landing page (link above). Thank you!

Best regards,
Mladen Pavlovic
The Toothpaste Argument for Universal Basic Income
The pseudoscience around grounding or “earthing” is always funny because it would be trivial to measure any current flowing into or out of the patient, yet that is conveniently omitted in favor of vague statements about the Earth being an “abundant source of mobile electrons”

Grounding is one of those pseudoscience topics that never seems to die because someone, somewhere will produce another study claiming dramatic positive results and the true believers will conveniently ignore any studies that don’t confirm their beliefs. Real researchers won’t touch these topics because they don’t want to be associated with such pseudoscience, so much of the published research comes from quack medicine practitioners.
The Artemis 3 will launch on SLS and land humans on the moon?
Really? I see plenty of automated exploit attempts against my vhosts.
Starlink could be an ecological disaster
(article author here) There's definitely nothing wrong with Mermaid. In fact, the current syntax at https://flowchart.fun can be converted to Mermaid (in export window) and I'll continue to support that when I migrate the app to the new syntax I'm proposing in this article.

The biggest differentiator is indenting to create edges, which I think is useful for some graphs and in some contexts (especially for quick brainstorming). Mermaid is great and super expressive.
Funny enough I had a report that I had to put a ton of effort into breaking this habit. They'd message me with something like "Good morning!" And nothing else until I replied even if that meant waiting hours to ask whatever they wanted to ask.
"Flying Microtonal Banana" - because why not fret a whole bunch of guitars for 24-Tet and record an album?

https://guitar.com/news/music-news/king-gizzard-stu-mackenzi...
You could hack someone's business bank account and ACH debit other people, yes.

But then you have to get the money out of that account, and into cash in your hands without leaving a trail that leads to you. It's possible, but complicated. And if you could do it, there was probably already significant money in the account you hacked into in the first place. No need to pad it with ACH debits that might set off alarm bells.
Like every systems programming language with GC support.

Modula-2+, Modula-3, Nim, Mesa/Cedar, .NET Native, Sing#, Oberon, Oberon-2, Oberon-07, Active Oberon, Nim, Swift (RC is a GC algorithm per CS definition), and even if debatable what its role might be, Go.

The point I am making is having a GC managed heap doesn't preclude features for manual memory management, only GC haters think otherwise.
I'm sure it depends on the person. A lot of people spend a lot of time staring at their own faces in the mirror and carefully examining hundreds or thousands of photographs of themselves. Whereas I'm pretty sure that my doppelganger would vaguely remind me of someone, and a day or two later I'd realize the person they reminded me of was me.
Jacobin is well known for being incredibly low quality journalism. So why would calling that out affect his credibility?
Profanity and nudity are the categories here, at least for broadcast tv.
welcome to the monkey house, dan.

combining HN and kindle is intriguing. my most serious work
occurs laying in bed reading, before falling asleep. i will surely follow your work.
I love how my previous comment was even flagged :-)

They're artificial smiles, I guess you're programmed to use them from an early age.

I've literally seen an American coworker, from a distance, with a normal resting face, put it on once they were at a range where they'd realize it's me, then immediately drop it after passing by (I turned around precisely to see the follow up).

My impression is that they're supposed to be a sign of success. A sort of Instagram reality before its time. People smiling are usually happy and probably successful.

Plus, of course, it relaxes the interlocutor and makes them feel appreciated, up to a point.

All in all, a gimmick.
> by bringing the late 90s/early 2000s aesthetic back in the form of wider fits and louder colors.

I'm just glad my college clothes will be back in style again, right as my daughter gets old enough to care what her dad is wearing.
> that e.g. the Senate building was bombed in 1983 by a bunch of leftists upset over the US’s involvement in Lebanon.

This has to be fascist propaganda because we know for a fact that Jan 6 was the first time the Capitol was ever attacked.
I think good places in the past to look are "warning labels" and/or "common carrier"-like ideas.

Warning labels today, I think means "fixing voluminous EULA crap," which we've done in other fields reasonably well, e.g. the FDA I think is pretty solid here. Simply requiring "readable" terms of services I think would go a long way (though you have to wait a bit for things to shake out.)

The general principles behind "common carrier" type services would also be a good idea to start thinking about; they essentially just say "When your product or service becomes a day-to-day thing for a lot of people, we're going to hold you to certain accessibility rules."
I've been interested in showing others this type of data related to SSH honeypots. I'm currently running a cowrie honeypot and I put together this Flask web app wrapped over cowrie's SQLite db to display the data it collects.

So far, ~1/4 of the 85,000 or so SSH attempts have been from the same address in Brazil.

If anyone's interested -- https://live-honeypot.com
I wouldn't say the story is inflated. She won a few awards at the "Regeneron International Science and Engineering Fair, the world’s largest international pre-college STEM competition". I assume the judges and the people running that are not just some nobodies.
It's a deeper level of censorship. Not only will you refrain from thinking about these things in a tolerant light, you will refrain from thinking about these things at all.

It chops pieces off reality when you do that.

Censorship is amazing. So popular (downvotes anyone?), so casually employed, yet so incredibly destructive.
> most importantly, the release must be controllable by the user.

This is pining for a world which no longer exists, because security patches must be applied to anything that matters immediately.
Looking like someone posted this article in exactly the wrong place.
In a previous job, I joined a team that was supposed to be introducing DevOps to the organisation.

It started out well -- we spent a few months hacking with Terraform, Docker, Vagrant, Kubernetes, and related technologies to implement an infrastructure-as-code approach -- automating the process of provisioning and decommissioning servers, and building a setup where development teams could deploy updates with a simple git push.

Unfortunately it all went downhill fairly rapidly. We ended up spending the majority of our time manually applying security patches to a bunch of snowflake servers that we'd lifted-and-shifted from another hosting provider to AWS, and fielding support requests from the development teams. Within a year, we were being told in no uncertain terms by our project manager that we were an operations team, not a development team.

It felt like a complete bait-and-switch. Within two years, I had left the organisation in question and moved on to a new job elsewhere doing actual development again. Last I heard, the entire team had been disbanded.

It sounds like the author of this article must have had a very similar experience. I wonder just how common it is. It seems that in many places, "DevOps" is all Ops and no Dev.
Micro-Tonal bands such as King Gizzard play around/bend the rules on the whole 12 notes in music thing.
Kinda weird that author categorized the incest joke "Howard: I lost my virginity to my cousin Jeanie" under LGBTQ censorship. When she mentioned the justification: "China has encouraged straight couples to marry and raise two to three children." it makes some sense, but incestuous relationships are not considered by themselves "LGBTQIA2S+"
If you are already using DataDog or planning to use DataDog as observability tool for microservices, check out my latest blog on how to configure DataDog as OpenTelemetry tracer backend for distributed tracing.
Really? We've loaded that much cryogenic fuel before on a manned mission?

Pretty sure it's untried. Theoretically easy, just like launching starship is theoretically easy.
I am saying this as a lone wolf that prefers solitude: the vast majority of people do not do well in isolation, and humans evolved as social creatures. It is far more likely that he desired companionship to solitude. Living that long by oneself tends to cause psychological problems. I think it would have been much better for him had some local anthropologist decided to earn his trust to study his culture, learned enough to communicate with him to discover his needs, hopes, dreams and desires.

Sounds like he was a remarkable and quite industrious individual.
Well, if we don't solve the poacher problem, eventually it will solve itself: no more rare animals to poach.
A Buddha is someone who reached enlightenment.

The Buddha is Buddha the guy.
The red line (2022 data) stops at July, and while it's hard to tell exactly it looks to me like the diamond line (not sure what to call that color) for 2012 is the lowest line between August and October.
As someone with prosopagnosia, I'd be relying on him to recognise me. Although, he might have it too!
Nice. I like vintage tools, but if you need an oiler now, it's hard to beat a Goldenrod. Still made in USA, excellent quality and available in various styles. I paid about $24 from McMaster-Carr.
At some point all excess water flows to the sea or evaporates into the atmosphere, where it turns to rain and then to the sea. So sea (ocean, really) levels do not change.
They are extremely good, however they are even better if we don't throw waste at them.

The most performance code is the one you don't have to execute.
We have the technology today to have the vast, vast majority of our transportation miles powered by electricity, and the ability to generate electricity from numerous sources. Like you said, out of control energy prices ripple to everything else. Electrifying everything provides a counterbalance to the volatility of oil on the global market.
Someone asked him directly this question and he addressed it in quite a lot of detail, something along the lines of two morally good ideas of extreme transparency and extreme privacy. I don't agree with him though, I personally stand strictly on the conservative/classical-liberal side that there is no compromise that's acceptable with regards to 4th amendment.
It is abused, it's called check fraud. However the same as automobile accidents, it's old news, and just apart of every day life.

People have been doing all forms of check fraud. One popular one is where they'll send a check, you cash it, money shows up, and it reverses later because it's fraudulent.
I very cursory read seems to say yes. The biggest difference I see is that Jevons paradox is paradoxical because of the intent to increase efficiency (eg. make pages load faster, reduce the amount of coal needed, etc).
I can see how this might backfire. You notice a censored jump and start to feel the itch of curiosity as to what it concealed. I had to watch several of the censored scenes whereas I would have never just randomly watched clips of the show.

Also, love the presentation on this page.
I mean at a fundamental level if you can take out the same amount of water(or more) as is melting, yes. But I think from the shear size of the problem, most people have a hard time reasoning about just how much water we are talking about.
You can't just take money with the numbers.

You have to be a bank or otherwise registered with the clearing house.

So you can ask your bank to pull money from my account, and if I object my bank will claw back the money from your bank and they will know who you are.

And if it wasn't all a misunderstanding or a typo, then they know where to find you.
> The animosity comes from being tricked into vendor lock-in with "free" samples.

Care to name one of these lock-in licenses specifically rather than generally?

It's not the licenses, it's the tactics they allow. Microsoft giving away Office to schools for so long is why so many companies use it today. They are afraid of teaching their employees something new, so they don't even consider it. Because everyone realizes this, there is little competition.

As someone who earns money from opensource software used by both companies and individuals I really have no idea what this actually means. Care to elucidate for the rest of us what a "paid free" or " zero cost non-free" license is? Literally just an example link to one of those types of licenses is all I'm asking here.

I thought I was pretty clear, but I guess not. When I said "zero cost non-free" I meant any software that doesn't cost money, but does not give users freedom. An example would be Microsoft Edge. When I said "paid free" I meant software that costs money, but does give users freedom. An example would be RHEL, it was still free/opensource code but they only let paying customers download it from their servers. I'm not sure if redhat still works this way after the changes they've gone through since IBM, but that was their thing for a long time.
There is significant ACH fraud.

https://www.cfo.com/corporate-finance/2019/04/scammers-targe...
I'm arguing that we have the SLS today and we don't have another compatible option. Is SLS the best outcome? Of course not, if we had a time machine would we go do it differently, of course.

But it's sitting on the pad today and nothing else is.