skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
iOS still doesn't let you place icons anywhere you want on the home screen, though. It's been fifteen years.

Desktops, and Android, have allowed you to do this for decades.
The silent majority in software
Since this is HN, let me note a wonderful talk based on the "introduce words carefully" concept: growing a language, buy Guy Steele

https://youtu.be/_ahvzDzKdB0
among hundreds of thousand others (~1/3 M+), including US citizens.
> but only in Lisp do people actually do it

That is false. Do yourself a favor and run "git grep -F ')))))' in, oh, the root of the Linux kernel tree.
It's really impressive how makes a difference. I had a portable AC running very near of where my computer are, and with RRNoise (and now EasyEffects), the noise can't be noticed. Also, I use a mechanical keyboard and barely it's noticed when I talk and I type at same time.
Suppose we have access to Twitter's metrics and we can see the profit made via Pakistani accounts and the associated cost (moderation is a cost).

I suspect that the balance is negative for most countries and that is why we cannot expect better moderation.
If two independent teams recreate this song based on our best knowledge about how the song sounded, can you tell these renditions are two versions of the same song?

Not a perfect test (experts can recognize more similarities) but generally makes it possible to discern "we know jack shit" from "we know the melody, just maybe not exactly how the instrument sounded".
it would require some time to properly describe the various issues but they are mostly related to 2 thematic areas: window management/snapping in place when in multiple screens and using specific features (e.g. dock, full screen apps) in a multi screen environment. And more in general it's just the presence of little bugs here and there that makes the experience not particularly smooth, for example there are some gestures that you can do when your screens are positioned side by side, but not when your screens are positioned on top of another
Here's one for you: whenever I have my second monitor plugged in, I'm muted on any video platform (Google Meet, Zoom, etc)
In England you discover that English has actually two different existences… The ordinary one and then the “dirty” one. Almost any word has or can be made to have a “harmful” meaning…

Useless effort.
There is a limit to supply: the number of hardware unit able to run it.

Cost isn’t irrelevant. Either you burn software on floppy, cd or make it available over internet and download, all those have a cost. Also between cost or RD and development, documentation writing, there cost after sales with customer support and product patching.

Open source is like blogging. You bear the cost (hidden or not) to publish you work for which you are very rarely paid (directly or indirectly).
Once published, you lost control of potential benefit over your work,

I clearly remember the gpg développer calling for financial help after more Than 20years developing almost alone this crucial piece of software with almost 20k euros yearly income from standard job. I was working in paiement industry where this piece of software is the key element of the business protecting file transfert containing millions of euros. The company benefit was around 6billions euros a year and all this would not have been possible without a pci-dad certification based on gpg. Is it normal ? When I inform them that the author of their key piece of code so important to their business was struggling with just basic living, they didn’t move a finger. While myself as a self employed was. One of the first to send several hundred euros to this poor guy.
Once the new hit major info website, then Google or Facebook transférés some money, in an public relation initiative.

So this case is typical of why OSS is a financial failure.

When I patched ansible, I worked, I spent time and done intellectual work for this project, adding value , easing and solving problem users faced and extended the possibility of the software. When it was bought by redhat, I didn’t get a penny for my work. My family didn’t benefited from my work, as a father I failed to feed them from my work. So who can rejoice of such situation where work isn’t rewarded ? (Beside getting a little Github medal for having a PR accepted)
Every time that I Try Wayland, I always get really annoying bugs. Including one that puts black both of my screens and I only can do it's a REISUB.
I would keep yet on X11, that on my case works better.
They should just acquihire the Big Mountain Studio guy. It’s crazy that you have to pay $300 for proper docs.
12.5 BILLION doses have been administered. The datasets are deep and wide, the analysis tools are powerful, and tens of thousands of well-trained epidemiologists have been analyzing the data for many, many months. The opportunity to make one’s mark has never been better.

But it’s these two brainiacs, who are not trained in the science, who have revealed the Shocking Truth that blows the lid off, using weird math and alternative facts.

Pull the other one, it has bells on!
> (or you’re intentionally moving the goal posts here and abandoned good-faith)

That's the end of our conversation, we're discussing grammar and its colloquial use, not anything that requires "good faith argumentation". Inane.
previous convos:

* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32371513
* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32454623
* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32350099
* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32589429
* etc
DDD is not hightly coupled to OOP, the problem is that most popular books (red and blue one linked in Fowler's blog for example) were written in time when OOP was very popular and authors also used languages that propagates OOP. If the authors would used purely functional languages then people wouldn't assume it is about OOP.
But why would anyone running Linux even desire a Windows-like Linux environment? Is not "rebellion", to me it sounds rather fanatic.
Diverse life forms would also be grateful. Win-win for everything.
NO2 interferes with the bodies ability to absorb vitamin b12. Sustained abuse of No2 even if only several times a week can cause enough of a disruption to b12 absorption that paralysis and other issues affecting motor coordination and locomotion can occurr. It is not the side effect free drug people make it out to be.

H20 can also be lethal if ingested in large enough quantities. So I understand your position on the inherent silliness of the policy response. But it is harmful and statements like these minimize the risks posed by NO2.
Goodness. The key accused was granted bail after two years in prison. Such brazen complicity from the entire justice system in India. The police watched. The judges only convicted three people in an act that seems to have in various degrees involved tens of people. And who knows how many of those convicted were released.

Disgusting.
Are these really considered for professional use only in US? Here we use them at home since the result is infinitely better than the instant whipped cream variants.
People are too pessimistic.

If we had time travel, they’d say now someone can kill our granddads and rewrite history. If we had flying cars, they’d say now our flats are worthless because everyone can fly by and gaze. If we had universal basic income, they’d say something about it too.

It’s really nice that we only got AIs that draws pictures and bitcoin that helps with stolen money.
> That's not a direct result of OOP.

It's actually the core definition of objects. Objects are entities supporting open recursion, self-polymorphism and late binding.

There is a difference between "having type-classes" and "having object as a core formalism of computation"

> Languages can have

Languages can have objects, or actors, or other entities alike. This doesn't mean it's prudent to design your code around the idea of message-exchanging FSMs. Sometimes at some scale objects or actors are useful.

> And it's not like the problem magically goes away for procedural code.

This is empirically not true, and the frameworks example is the best proof of it. In languages like (functional) Scala, Go, OCaml, libraries do compose well enough, and gluing them is cheap.

Any hardcore OOP language eventually brings frameworks like Spring, Rails, etc, because gluing objects is expensive, and for no reason, if functional/procedural alternative is so much cheaper. Even natural transformations between monads are very cheap compared to objects' composition.
This is a really interesting article.

Perhaps the low hanging fruit is now gone. Perhaps it's going to be harder in future to establish really large companies.

Of course there are many valuable companies yet to be created, but perhaps an era is starting to come to a close.
This is an interesting article, because SwiftUI has a lot of constraints and quirks (which I definitely will not go into here) but it identifies performance specifically as something they ran into problems with. SwiftUI, like all "reactive" frameworks, specifically tries to make your UI a function of state, trying to "logically" redraw everything so that it's always up-to-date. Obviously, this kind of UI is untenable so it will try to form a dependency graph of what needs updating and change only that.

The issue is that Apple sort of claims that this is all you really need to do, and that the framework will kind of handle it for you. In reality you need to be really careful about what's being updated to avoid spurious updates. Actual SwiftUI code for anything non-trivial necessarily requires some manual debouncing and equatable checks. I hear React Native often has the same issue, but there people have experience with applying memo when necessary. With SwiftUI it's considered "advanced" and bites people before they really know how to deal with it. And, of course, that's assuming that the dependency graph is working correctly: if it's not, you're often stuck and there's often not much you can do.
I read IAEA inspectors are on the way to inspect the Ukraine power plant taken hostage by Russia.

I presume nobody ever thought it would be useful or necessary, but why is it not part of nuclear power plant protocols to have installed a (perhaps solar powered) MCA (multi channel analyzer) with a relatively passive uplink?

Passive uplink could be anything creative like a simple single pixel LCD shutter over a corner cube / retroreflector, so transmission doesn't take much power...

EDIT for clarity: this MCA ground station can refuse to modulate until it recognizes a signed optical transmission through downlink (from satellite or spy plane), and thus only modulate LCD when it is queried by IAEA / allied nations. The modulation of course allows subtracting the background (i.e. sunlight, but also satellite modulated light reflections that did not pass the LCD modulation). This way adversary has a hard time locating the device from above as the allies can refuse to query the MCA-groundstation when adversary planes or satellites are overhead. Instead of a retroreflector covered by a single pixel LCD an alternative could be a mirror covered by an LCD placed at the focal distance of a lens, such that it can only be queried from a certain direction...
As a bootstrapped founder, my execution has been markedly different after I had a small exit. I started with enough cash in the bank to pay for 3 months of operations. Now, I have enough for 30 months of ops. It's a massive change in the way I run things now.

Money is the single most important factor in anything, from creating art to creating companies.
Artemis rocket to launch to moon 8:33am EST 8/29
$5k/mo with social network for solo devs building startups
Ok, but how do you get the data broadcasting code onto the airgapped computer?

If this was handed to me by our internal info sec team, I’d have to downgrade it to “non-urgent”.
Artichokes are only nominally food. Functionally, they're recreation.
The moon is haunted.
Your second monitor has a microphone jack (without anything connected) which it autoselects for audio input? I think the usual logic is to use the most recently added microphone
That is a very narrow-minded viewpoint I think. There is currently no comparable rocket system comparable to SLS even with all its warts. If it flies today, it's the only operational Human rated heavy lift system. Starship is promising, but still a lot more speculative.

Using the shuttle systems reduces the engineering risks. This means that SLS may be more expensive than something scratch-designed, but there is also a lot less insecurity in the schedule (though there was enough ...).

I don't think there was a way for NASA to start the Artemis program sooner than with SLS. I don't think it's a good idea to entirely depend on SpaceX for heavy lift rockets or human rated space flight.

I also don't understand your point about Orion not being able to go to the moon. Of course it "could" get as close to the moon as it wants. But it is basically a command and reentry module, not a lander. There are more potential missions for the Orion than for a combined lander and reentry module. So you'd have some kind of rendezvous in any case which also saves fuel.
Is that with or without ads?
You deserve credit for this tool. I used it on a 35mm slide taken in 1982 that was scanned using a Nikon SUPER COOLSCAN 9000 ED. The original image was around 4000x3000 pixels. I ran it through and resized it back down and it's impressively better.

The binary at 160MB ran flawlessly on a HP Dev One laptop with Debian sid and processed the image in about 10 minutes. The difference is remarkable.

You have done a brilliant job of getting a simple front end on top of a huge pile of complicated under the hood by doing the smart thing: using your time efficiently so you can focus on the hard parts of the puzzle.
“ Quality always rises to the top. That's a law of nature.”

That is definitely not a law of nature.
Any tl;dw to that 43 minute video?
On the other hand, systems where the bar for guilt is too high err too much towards not punishing criminals. Eventually such systems are rejected by their subjects and collapse, either totally or into anarcho-tyranny. This is especially true of states with great power over the middle classes, but little power or willingness to exercise it over the worst criminal element. There's a balance to be found in the middle between standards of guilt that are too high or too low.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_T._Francis#Thought_and_...

>Francis's term "anarcho-tyranny" refers to armed dictatorship without rule of law, or a Hegelian synthesis when the state tyrannically or oppressively regulates citizens' lives yet is unable or unwilling to enforce fundamental protective law.
This makes we want to profile postgres if they have this kind of thing in version 14.
One of the easiest research papers I did in uni was for my Psychology 101 about using St Johns Wort for depression. It was describable in Germany ATT with decent success rate for mild-moderate depression.

I wonder why it doesn't get prescribed / officially recommended here in USA?
Data structure + algorithm is a valid way of building large programs. That is basically how Clojure is designed, and it works pretty well for big applications.

Functional programming in aviation:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0x3EIqBrZxw

Functional programming in banking:
https://www.finextra.com/newsarticle/36297/nubank-buys-firm-...
Literally was just looking at doing this an hour ago. After deciding it’d be too much work I come to hn for my pre-sleep reading and find this, lol.
I think the simple words for those who learn as children are not the same for those who learn as grown ups.

For example in English, "English" and "example" are not simple words, but "word-set" is.

But you learn "English" on day one, and "set" much later, and "example" is simpler than "word" for many.
My point was more about the tuning slides on a trumpet, and that it doesn’t have a “fixed tuning.” It’s almost like a trombone in a way: you can play any tone you want within a certain range by adjusting the slides.

(I do apologize if I came across poorly—I couldn’t think of another way to ask the question.)
Cue aubergine and peach emoji.
Rise of the parking app makes the rich richer as motorists struggle
Advantages of CRT over LCD
But that's only if someone knows that your email is bob@duck.com, right? (And the same would happen if someone knew your true email address was bob@example.com - they could just send emails there.) I think the intended use case is that you use a different and unique alias, e.g. randchars83@duck.com, for every service. At least, that's how we intend Firefox Relay to be used. Then you can just throw away that alias if it starts getting used for unwanted messages.
Not really, because the amount of workarounds, and extension loading, tends to increase to the point that the multiple code paths are hardly any different from having a plugin architecture, and slowly one gets a middleware engine that only uses "one" API.
The word we use to describe them derives from the ancient greek "sea monster"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cetus_(mythology)
So I just had a convo with a buddy at netflix,

>>"_There are often PIP bugs that block video in the secure video pipeline_"

-

So, is this exploitable, as opposed to just being "cool"
This mission will probably prove that SLS and Orion can bring Humans into lunar orbit. Starship hasn't gotten into orbit yet and is very far from being Human rated, both in terms of life support and launch reliability. By 2024, Starship MAY be doing return trips to LEO and they will be testing the lunar lander.

SLS isn't more absurd than putting Humans on the Moon in the first place. It's an insane task in the best circumstances.
I live in Midwest now (KS). Yea, that was true 10 years ago, but even 4G is decent in rural areas now. & there are 2-3 dish providers in some areas.

+ my point is, most population don't have that limited choices.
Yes, because children in the inner city are subsisting on ALMONDS.
Minor nitpick: According to your Wikipedia link SocialCam (launch March 2011, sold July 2012) predated Twitch (launch June 2011, sold August 2014), so that was an upward progression.
Good point, I should have clarified that I meant fantasies of one's own country's medieval period, which of course the USA did not have.
Some don't realize the fix is often worse than the problem.
Is the book suitable for beginners?
The state of Flow-based Programming
Does anyone know how companies like Twitter do moderation in countries like Pakistan. Hiring locals could be dangerous when coup happens. Hiring Pakistani expats (there’s plenty) tricky too as their families are still in danger (I assume their military is sophisticated enough to track whose relative works where). What is the ration of moderators to active user count. Do they specifically hire oppressed groups (i.e. Kurds in Turkey, Tibetans and Uighurs in China, etc) to shed a different opinion?
I'll finish up on the objections here as I don't wish to continue the conversation they come from but do wish to clear them up.

> Native speakers say “the store” even when there’s no expectation that a) I know which store they mean,

The other person doesn't need to know, it's acting like a specific place has been introduced without it being introduced because to specifically introduce it is wasteful.

> or b) I go there myself or will in the future. ie, the standard you use for deciding whether “the” would work in the conservatory example.

Everyone except the terminal and imminent misfortune will go shopping to the kind of shop "the" will be put in front of. If you were a musician and said "when I went to the conservatory" I wouldn't blink either.

> Even under your new standard, you should say that “the conservatory” is fine as long as the listener “goes/has gone to conservatories”.

It may well be, and it still fits with what I described, and expected shared experience that is assumed to need no further introduction for the rest of what is about to be told.

> Finally, in case it matters: yes, I have had native speakers (my parents) say “the store” even when I (also a native speaker) didn’t go shopping at all, being too young to do it.

You have been or will go shopping in your life, and you know or will come to know what they are referring to. Older people will often use language to youngsters that youngsters do not fully understand yet. It helps the youngsters come to understand it.

> (This is why oh-so-clever rhetorical questions should be used with caution.)

Because they point out the stupidity of a response and may invite further stupidity in response? Yes, that is a downside.
Space exploration is always "pork barreling". It's just a quest of where to send the insane amount of money. Putting it all with Elon Musk isn't exactly the free enterprise way either.
Reminds me of a joke: three guys get locked up for a long time. Out if boredom they start telling jokes to each other, but as the supply is finite, they are retelling them all the time. Eventually they number them, then just shout out eg "27", and they are all laughing.

Then a new inmate joins, doesn't know what's going on but figures that if you say a number, people laugh. So he goes "14!". But nothing happens. The others tell him "you didn't tell the joke right".

How is the poor AI meant to know that jokes 6, 13 and 38 are sexist?
Why were you disappointed? I haven't tried that with img2img, but as just a regular text prompt without any fancy prompt engineering I get results in line with what I'd expect (kind of a Hugo Boss/Cowboy crossover, e.g. this: https://imgur.com/a/gcKi3WG)
Not only Americans. It seems here in Europe is the same.
Music from 1400BC is cool, but the real throwback is the 2009 YouTube video in the article that starts with Weird Al's "eBay" and default animated text.
I'd also state that space flight is damn hard and damn expensive in the first place.
This original silent majority was a victim of Soviet propaganda. Nothing is better in war when the enemy no longer wants to fight because he has self-doubt.
Why are you trying to shame me for wanting what I want?
> I think there is no IP block and no reports from Austria about collateral damage

There is definitely a good amount of collateral damage, not all ISPs rolled out the block already, but some did.

I myself noticed a lot of sites stopped working or fail to load scripts/external resources. On reddit r/austria there are also multiple complaints.

Most normal users probably just suspect their router/pc acting up. It took me a day too to get to the gist of this issue with sites not loading without tor.
FWIW I was an EE/Math undergrad 45 years ago and ours were

- FORTRAN (heavy on the numerical methods)

- MIX (only in a side project)

- PL/C (a really nifty "training wheels" version of PL/1)

- BASIC (on a PDP-series computer with a room full of ASR-33's)
I listen to a lot of old music where there are many different renditions of the same song, especially Armenian folk music that was either unwritten or transcribed later, and I agree with this metric.