skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
18 (the car wasn't actually in FSD), 19 (that screen just means the car has FSD available, not that it's currently in use), and the parts of 21-24 that claim they FSD was active.
You go underground as many have had to in the past.
So solar farms don't sell to the grid at midnight. You really don't know how any of this works, do you?
Those bits of macOS don’t need pointing out, they’re usually pretty obvious by way of small inconsistencies and taking an extra 0.3-0.5s to load compared to their surroundings.
The difference between your two takes appears to be a Motte and Bailey.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motte-and-bailey_fallacy

The question isn't whether abeppu's stance is valid, the question is: does their stance fully encompass the argument.

elefanten appears to be suggesting abeppu's stance is a Motte - that they're arguing a more defensible position (you shouldn't be able to publish research claiming one race is superior to another) rather than the real Bailey (anything deemed "harmful" can be filtered from scientific literature). The difference between these two arguments is pretty significant.
The whole point of science is to find the truth, not to only find the truths that we feel comfortable with.

Of course many scientists throughout history have sucked at that at various times, but that doesn't make it a bad ideal.
For heliocentrism the article "The Great Ptolemaic Smackdown and Down-and-Dirty Mud-Wrassle" by Michael F. Flynn from the Jan/Feb 2013 issue of Analog is pretty good. Here's a scan online [1].

The Church's position at the time was that God made the universe, and if empirical evidence from observing that universe clearly showed that it did not work the way the Church thought the Bible said it worked, then the Church must have misinterpreted the Bible.

Galileo's problems came from a combination of several factors, none of which stem from proposing a non-geocentric universe.

1. Galileo's heliocentric theory wasn't actually better at explaining observations than geocentric theories were. Galileo, like the Church believed in an intelligently designed universe created by an all-powerful God. He believed that such a God would choose laws of physics that were beautiful and elegant.

Where his heliocentric approach would require something non-beautiful or inelegant to fit observation he dismissed the observations as optical illusions or observational error.

It's commonly believed that the moons of Jupiter and the phases of Venus rule out geocentric theories, but that is not quite correct. They rule out the Ptolemaic system which was the leading geocentric theory, but they do not rule out the Tychonic geocentric system.

2. He had a very big ego.

3. He was an asshole. He was very intolerant and rude to his rivals and to those he considered to be his inferiors. And thanks to that big ego "inferiors" included pretty much everyone else.

4. He was a celebrity who was regularly invited to hang out with the rich and powerful.

5. He had an atrocious sense of politics. He either failed to realize or ignored that some of the people he was an asshole towards had the wealth and power to make his life miserable if he didn't stop being an asshole toward them.

[1] https://faculty.fiu.edu/~blissl/Flynngs.pdf
I'm saying I'm personally happy to pay for the subscription if I don't use it, and don't care if they move to a "refill" model. So my take is that not all the prime customers are scammed.

That being said it's been a while since I did the signup flow, maybe it's gotten way worse, do you have an example?
I would think cloud storage of some kind is default in the current devices. I use dropbox as storage for DB file and it autosync with other PC and phones. Also you can get access to file in browser if needed. Google drive might be even better for it.
How to Write a Strategy Statement Your Team Will Remember – NOBL Academy
Using the "Even Over" approach when defining your strategy is powerful. It clearly puts tradeoffs, making it easier for the team to make decisions: "I'm willing to lose this to optimize that."
BitWarden user here.

Everything in 1Password minus the toxic optimism, standards compliant migration (1Password can't import from BitWarden, but other way round works) and one fourth of the subscription costs. BitWarden is easy to manage - I got my mother to install it on her Android device, and she can easily manage passwords. Their shift to an expensive subscription genuinely disappointed me with subpar applications. When alternatives work, why consider 1Password? Best option is to stay away from them.
The last link above shows the view from inside the car, showing the accelerator was not pressed though

https://mobile.twitter.com/RealDanODowd/status/1559245760054...
However, Haiku is gaining a ton of GNU/Linux software. It becomes less interesting to me when people are just porting the same junk to it.

Serenity is far more interesting.
You were an amazing user, customer, and still to this day friend. It still blew my mind when you first shared you were writing a book on Heroku.
I wish I could upvote this harder.
That's a totally valid concern, but Amazon gives you a bunch of opportunity to avoid surprises. They send an email a few days before finalizing your upcoming deliveries, and you can review the price to see if it changed, and either skip a delivery, skip a single product in a delivery, or cancel a subscription entirely.

As a real example: my subscriptions are on a 2 month cycle, and get delivered roughly on the 3rd, which gives me until the 26th of the preceding month to make changes. On the 24th they send an email with all the prices that will be charged if I don't change anything. With almost no friction, I can change or cancel anything up until the 26th.
I do a few interviews a month for our group. I get cheaters every once in a while.

Most of them use a second window to look up answers. This is pretty obvious, from watching them in the webcam, and where they pause. This is also easy to detect, since they'll fail with more abstract questions that don't have an answer you can just look up. For example, tell them to go deep into a project that they have on their resume. Nearly every time, they eventually say, directly or not, that their part was minimal. I don't think anyone has to worry about these people.

But, recently, one person almost made it all the way through, before getting to me. From what I can guess, they had someone in a separate video call, watching the screen and listening to the interview, giving them the answers. I think a language barrier, for the person giving the answers, was the only reason they eventually fell flat. This is a problem that worries me. How do you filter these people, if firing is extremely frowned upon in your org? The only real initial hint that I had was the abysmal typing speed vs claimed experience, which is not a reason that you can write down, for why you failed someone, without looking like some sort of elitist.

I think this will eventually become a real problem, with remote interviews. I think in person, or monitoring, is the only way to catch something like this. But, how do you do an in person interview with a remote team? You either make your requirements even more impossible, or you change the culture of your org to accept that new people may have to be let go, without it being the hiring managers fault (not going to happen).
Young people use google for YouTube more than anything else. When they search, it’s on YouTube.
Hobbyists hosting on AWS is a fast track to personal bankruptcy. All it takes is one hug of death.
What a weird comment. People are being negative because they don't like their actions. It's not that complicated. You aren't even making a counter argument. "Just use something else." is just dismissing criticisms. That is willful ignorance.
I believe the executive and middle management culture is exorbitantly over paid for their actual "work" throughput and an office space justified their link in the chain.

If work gets completed in islands of production, it will become clear what executives and managers contribute.

So, whether or not the executives and middle management are fluff or not, the existential fear of being "found out" drives them back.

It's almost an after thought to their business reasoning that office leases are an execuse
Well, historically speaking, the Law.
my greater fear is that perhaps the net's not dying to bots but, simply because humans have created a ml environment for ourselves and integrated a kernel of some collective intelligence into every connected member
If you're wanting pricing simplicity, cannot go much simpler than Digital Ocean: you pay monthly for a server. The end.
> Subscriptions aren't a big deal for the first 5-10 services, but once you're juggling 20+ recurring charges for things that don't really need to be recurring charges, it's tiresome.

The world is going in this direction, however: everything is turning into Cloud+SaaS to charge for use instead of bill once and forget. The next big thing will very likely be a service that makes extremely easy to aggregate and manage the 465 or maybe 3044 micropayments per year one will need to use his compu... er... stupid terminal a few years from now.
> Malloc has the exact same structure: it's hella fast until you run out of RAM and it returns an allocation failure.

Doesn't that depend on the allocator though? Some malloc()s will perform some cleanup depending on their internal structure, which is not deterministic
Strange then that this company based in Germany is full of these dark patterns

https://www.internations.org/about-internations/

see the reviews complaining about them

https://www.reviews.io/company-reviews/store/internations-or...

https://www.reviewopedia.com/internations-org-reviews

https://www.trustpilot.com/review/internations.org
Publishing is the trivial part of academic publishing. Preprints already solved the problem of disseminating research results cost-effectively to everyone interested decades ago. The hard part is assigning merit.

Academics need merits to get jobs, promotions, grants, and prizes. The people assigned to evaluate the merits almost never have enough time and/or expertise to actually evaluate the quality of research. If they already know the person they are evaluating by reputation, they evaluate the reputation. Otherwise they use things like publication venues, citation counts, academic pedigrees, and earlier grants and prizes as proxies. Anything that tries to replace prestigious for-profit journals needs to provide non-expert evaluators a way of determining which published papers are likely to be of higher quality than the average.
While Elon lies a lot about his cars' future capabilities, I don't think he's ever lied about their current capabilities.
You can still read and export your data if your payments lapse to the point that your account freezes. They just don’t let you modify the data.
Not getting the covid vaccine and not getting the polio vaccine are 2 entirely different things. Most of the population is not at risk from covid
It's not like 1password is gonna delete your data or block you from accessing your data if payment fails and your account is frozen. It just gets into read-only mode.

They have a fairly generous policy is case you'd account is frozen: https://support.1password.com/frozen-account/
I'm not sure this is correct. I am seeing all of the posts just fine as a normal logged in user?
Quora is plagued with these "helpful" answers
I think they're more worried that employees will demonstrate no need for oversight, cutting the management class drastically
Slack, VS Code both are electron apps - both are great, nothing feels lazy about them
> If you had the option to delay humanity's discovery of atomic bombs to late 20th century or after, and therefore delay any substantial deep understanding of the atomic physics beneath, you would probably do it.

The alternative was 20-30 million more dead people via conventional means. There were many teams around the world working to build the bomb. One always wonders about the German team and why they were not first - and I"m glad they were not.

> philosophy of science

Not sure what that is, but do not want.
I like the idea of a Text UI markup language. It's envisage some kind of nested table describing the layout? More declarative?
Adequate seasoning is an enormous schwanzstucker in every home cook's toolkit.
The proof burden isn’t on you. The proof burden is on someone trying to ship a hard real time system with a GC. That person has to convince themselves that their system meets its deadlines. In a system that uses GC, the GC is either:

- stop the world. Then you have to prove that the GC pause will never be so long that it causes you to miss deadlines and that the pause can’t happen so frequently (even if small) that you miss deadlines. That’s impractical to do unless your heap is tiny. But some success stories of GC in hard RT did take the “lots of tiny heaps” approach, though I don’t know if they went as far as meeting the kind of proof burden that is demanded by the hardest of real time. With malloc, you could do tiny heaps if you wanted to, but you’d never be forced to do it just to appease malloc.

- the GC is a task. Then you have to prove that the task will meet its deadline. You have to do that for any task in a real time system. Unfortunately, the GC task’s deadline depends on allocation rate, which depends on the schedule of the entire rest of your system, plus a worst case allocation rate (bytes allocated per second) analysis. You don’t have to think about allocation rates if you’re using malloc. You just have to know how fast malloc is. With GC, you also have to know how fast it can allocate, and you need all that other stuff. It’s more work to get right.

- Work based incremental GC. These can avoid the schedulability analysis, sort of, but come with a lot of other baggage. The worst misfeature of these collectors is that the execution time of allocation is hella jittery. Sometimes very fast, other times very slow, though always O(1). That’s the kind of thing you could almost use in a hard RT system so long as the worst case isn’t too bad, but in practice it’s a nightmare because if you really assume that every allocation will perform as badly as the worst allocation case in one of these GCs then you’ll have to overprovision to the point of absurdity.

Most folks use a concurrent GC with some element of work based. So, the GC is a task, and its schedule is somehow tightly coupled to the current allocation rate. That’s good enough for soft RT and it can be good enough for some things on the softer side of hard RT. But even that’s hard to pull off and involves a beast of a collector, tight integration between RTOS and GC, and tight integration of the GC and test plan. No matter how you do it, way harder than malloc. You have all the problems of malloc plus other problems that malloc doesn’t have.
I don’t care about the subscription - if anything it’s on the cheap side for the value it gives. I too migrated several companies into teams over the years.

But, electron: no. I use a Mac primarily, and I want Mac apps that take the platform seriously, and integrate well with it. Regressing from that means you lose my business.
The interesting part is the relative absence of long and contentious threads about other commercial software, as I read the comment.
I feel the same way, and I'm firmly in the camp of "roll up my sleeves" if there is work to be done, but I have heartburn about doing that for Bitwarden for a few reasons:

* their problem doesn't seem to be "we don't have developer bandwidth to add this nice feature," but rather (from my perspective) they're so lacking in discipline and execution. In other words, the PR to fix any such bugs would be so massive as it might as well be a fork

* and that's just on the bugfix side -- anyone who thinks manually created folders are superior to tags ... well, there's no PR to fix that

* them being open core(?) makes contributing feel like free labor for a commercial company. I have less heartburn contributing fixes to GitLab because they do have a for-real open source offering (the CE edition) that one can run without drama
I never tried 1password, but I am using Bitwarden right now. What features are important to you that Bitwarden is missing? Just wondering if I should give 1password a try as well.
Just looking at the 90s to today is ignoring an awful lot of context about what political tensions in the US actually used to look like.

Just over 100 years ago, political disagreements in West Virginia over unionization led to a full-scale paramilitary battle at Blair Mountain [1], with upwards of 13,000 people involved and complete with the anti-unionization side bringing in private planes as improved bombers.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Blair_Mountain
One great feature of Privacy.com is that you can use pseudonyms rather than your legal name for making purchases. One "failure" mode I've encountered (twice!) is that if you accidentally reuse an old credit card account with a second service (eg. if you accidentally created a card for "donations" and use it at two different websites, or you create one for Ko-Fi or similar and it gets charged by multiple different "merchants" under the same service), the second transaction will fail. You'll get an email telling you the transaction was declined, but if you don't have email notifications enabled, it can get quite confusing why the payment isn't going through.
I think it should just be a federal law enforced by the CFPB. The level of obviousness, in terms of consumer protection, is very high here.
Yes, but the incongruousness of telling me what language something is written in in its sales one-liner makes me think it must be pitching itself as "especially for apps written in Go", because who thinks I am going to pick a tool because it is written in Go? "Try ElasticSearch, written in Java!"
Idealism is great, as an ideal. It starts to become a little delusional when you think your idealism lines up with reality.
Add to that browning, deglazing!
I was really into it until I hit some bug/corruption where it just stopped accepting my password to unlock it, and then I had literally 0 recourse and had to spend hours recovering it, since they wouldn't even let me just delete the account and start over.
I work for a company who pays $100k+ /month to Linode and we’ve regularly had uptime issues (for years) due to urgent maintenance or other outages in their data centers. Speaking of which, they currently have connectivity issues now in their London DC. I’d look to some other VPS provider like GCP/AWS/DO.
> "Blind isn't an actual biological condition, it's a social category"

Uh, this is actually true. Blindness is a legal definition not a medical condition. There are numerous medical conditions that can lead to a person being legally blind.
I’m already grateful to Apple for consolidating so many of my subscriptions into one interface. So much easier to manage.
Scientific language is terse and unambiguous for a reason. Efficient and precise transfer of ideas. "Go the shops and get a loaf of bread. If there are eggs, get a dozen".

I can't tell if this was tongue-in-cheek, but I've only ever heard that as an example of unclear communication: https://old.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/2z83kl/a_wife_sends_...
Sure, and it could then be challenged in court. And depending on the alignment of the courts, they might find in favor of the policy, setting a precedent for future law.

Do you really not understand how things work in this country?
Cliff wanted to use my knot diagrams in a math exhibit, so I got to meet him in his home, he is indeed the kindest and most dynamic gentleman I've ever met.

I'm also a fan of Cuckoo's Nest, and I recall seeing him on the PBS News Hour when I was a kid, they'd interview him for computer-related topics.
What does 1Password have that Bitwarden is missing? I mentioned elsewhere in the thread that I just switched from 1Password to Bitwarden about a month ago, and apart from the lack of touch ID support on the desktop and the Large Type feature, which are only minor annoyances, Bitwarden has been just fine for me.
Don’t forget the 1990 Nova special “The KGB, the Computer, and Me”

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PGv5BqNL164
Once you realize that censorship is a defensive action, not an offensive one, it becomes clear.

You don’t censor to get more people on your side. You censor to defend the people you’ve already collected (ie prevent losing them to the other side).
And it is better to opensource the code and never help anyone with any aspect of it at all, than to not release the code.
The only reference to Twitter on the page is in the footer "Follow us on Twitter" which links to https://twitter.com/NatureHumBehav. Where are you getting this Twitter stuff from?
What do you mean by "Touch ID support"? Bitwarden has Touch ID support.
The example code uses a `transact` function. But it really depends on what you mean by “transaction”. We don’t use a triple store at Notion, but we do use an abstraction that ensures a collection of operations either all succeed or all fail. We don’t support “interactive” transaction, where you can read, modify, write as an atomic group. This just isn’t desirable in a multiplayer or offline system - in cases we need that kind of consistency we use a normal HTTP API which is online-only.
Spoken like someone who did not use the "drag this window on top of the QR code on your screen" feature, nor its ability to detect native application's bundle-id and fill in passwords based on the application currently in focus

To include Windows users in this fun, previously one could invoke a hotkey and 1P would offer to auto-type into almost any Windows dialog on the screen. Poof, gone

I bet I could come up with 15 other things if I thought about it. Engineering is filled with tradeoffs, and so they made the "we don't enjoy writing cross platform code" versus "we really made our user's lives better by having native code integration capabilities"
I'm honestly dumbfounded. My grandma and grandpa, whom I was close with and enjoyed spending significant time with, were in a few assisted living type facilities for the last 10 years or so. I felt bad for them (they never liked the food, and loneliness is always a problem) but I felt equally bad for the staff (RNs, CNA, 'med-aides'). My grandparents just simply grew up in a different time and had different expectations so they would always be complaining about something or wanting this or wanting that. I felt terrible for the staff to have to deal with them.

The experience has solidified my mindset. I _will not_ live in a 'home' when I'm old, and will not let my mom enter on of those facilities.
It's on 1Password that they can export in a reasonable way that Bitwarden understands, but Bitwarden can't export that way?

Or to put it another way, you claim 1Password is not standards compliant. What standard should they be?

My experience is that Bitwarden has a clunky user interface, and I just don't trust them (yet) security-wise. I have no problem paying for an interface that my family can use.

1Password and Bitwarden are both really good options. If you are more in the Apple ecosystem, and prefer a great UX, then go 1Password. If you trust bitwarden, and are in other ecosystems, I think that's great too.

Throwing around phrases like "toxic optimism" and "standards compliant migration" is a bit low.

https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/best-password-man...
I'm a 1Password user, and the main thing that stopped me from using Bitwarden was them not having Account Switching.

They've managed to implement it in their clients in March this year [1], and I've been moving some of my shared credentials over to a self-hosted Vaultwarden server.

What other features do you think are missing from Bitwarden?

[1] https://bitwarden.com/blog/account-switching-phased-rollout-...
Jack Dorsey reveals his biggest regret about Twitter