skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This sounds fun. Let's pick a state that is not known for onerous regulations...how about South Dakota?

>Food employees must clean their hands in a handwashing lavatory and may not clean their hands in a sink used for food preparation or in a service sink or a curbed cleaning facility used for the disposal of mop water and similar liquid waste.

>Food must be stored in a clean, dry location where it is not exposed to splash, dust, or other contamination and is at least 15 centimeters (6 inches) above the floor

>Sufficient refrigeration facilities or other effectively insulated facilities that are conveniently located must be provided to assure the maintenance of potentially hazardous food at required temperatures during storage. Each mechanically refrigerated facility storing potentially hazardous food must be provided with a numerically scaled indicating thermometer, accurate to ±1°C (2°F), located to measure air temperature in the warmest part of the facility.

>Fruits and vegetables may be washed by using chemicals as specified in 21 C.F.R. 173.315, April 1, 1996. Any sink used to wash, prepare, store, or soak food must be indirectly connected to the sewer through an airbreak.

>A ventilation hood system must be provided over all cooking equipment which produces steam, excessive smoke, grease vapors, or odors.

>Perimeter walls and roof of a food establishment must effectively protect the establishment from the weather and the entry of insects, rodents, and other animals.

It would be hard to meet those requirements with a grill and two tables, but the list goes on:

https://sdlegislature.gov/Rules/Administrative/17361
I keep sending the New York Times my article "Ted Kaczynski was Right" and they refuse to publish it. Censorship is outta control I tell you.
I really wish there were room for a "your margin is my opportunity" player in spaces like this, but the existing cast already executes the "dumb pipe" role too well.
Nitpick: Less than 50% chance, but with a chance of finding more than 1.
sounds to me like the parent is right, the NYtimes is obviously trying to hide the story and avoid using the word real although it s surely implied
It's hardly comparable.

Scams happened over the internet, but didn't exploit critical problems with the technology itself.

Crypto scams exploit problems with crypto itself. Where else can a tiny mistake allow people to irreversibly drain your account in an instant and vanish?
What dialect is that wilihybrid? "seiskafemma"?
Not sure if there’s any objective measurement for what most people daily driving the PinePhone use - in my personal count postmarketOS (I do hope they stick to stable ;-)) with Sxmo was quite vocal and not rare, followed by Mobian with Phosh and postmarketOS with Phosh.
It seems like a rare bout of sanity for strlcpy to have fallen out of favor, in the kernel.

It never got into glibc, which was I guess another. But of course it is all over the BSDs, and not going anywhere AFaIK, more's the pity.
The ZOO hypothesis is uncannily attractive, because it a) sort-of humbles our egos and b) would actually be plausible even within humanity itself.

If we discovered another human civilization with a living and technological standard of Europe of 1022 AD, we would be able to keep an eye on them without revealing ourselves much. An occassional slip-up would be possible (a crashed drone), but most of the time, we would be able to let them live as they wish without interfering with them much. Probably to the point that the targeted civilization might consider any hypothesis of our surveillance a hoax or heresy.

And that is mere 1000 years of technological development on Earth. If the gap between us and hypothetical aliens is, say, 100 million years, I can't even begin to imagine the difference.
What about buying something?
Sudo has had its own debacles.
not really censorship, just a regression to the old norms. mainstream media are biased to the politics of their owners. Same with facebook, it s a mainstream medium now

Zuck claims that he was duped , but lets take everything with a grain of salt
Wait, so it really is possible to acquire (at least temporarily) nearsightedness from looking at close stuff too much?
And the giant "Nitro!" banners with blob melting faces and the rest. I don't know I uninstalled it after I made the mistake of installing it at work.
What is the problem of elections being somewhat random? The important function of elections is, that you can get rid off a government. They are not in office for life and they have to convince enough people with their doing - maybe some people are not for them for the facts, but a solid base has to be.

This article assumes that there is a "right" or correct government. Political questions never have a right and a wrong answer. They have different answers. Some are better argued, founded in facts, others aren't. But you can always only try one solutions and never know how the other would have worked out.
>This data is also being based on comparing conventional produce raising vice feedlot style farming

Given that 96%[5] of beef sold in the US is grain fed, it seems as if it would make sense to base the data on that.

Not only is it the norm, but it's apparently the best case scenario in terms of emissions. If you're trying to make an argument for beef being less emission intensive, you want to use CAFO numbers as grass fed numbers are worse.

According to these studies, grain fed cattle are slaughtered at 14 - 22 months of age, while grass fed cows are kept alive longer because they gain weight more slowly, leading them to be slaughtered at 20 - 26 months of age.[4]

Their extended lifespans lead to greater emissions even if they were to emit the same amount of CO2 + methane per day, but a diet of grass itself leads to higher methane emissions than grain, resulting in overall methane emissions being about 43% higher for grass-fed beef.[1]

Methane traps about 80 times more heat than CO2 over the first 20 years, before it degrades into CO2 and then overall ends up trapping about 25 times more over the first 100 years.[2]

Now, some of that may be offset by by soil carbon sequestration in the grass fed beef, but according to the Oxford study below -

“This report finds that better management of grass-fed livestock, while worthwhile in and of itself, does not offer a significant solution to climate change as only under very specific conditions can they help sequester carbon. This sequestering of carbon is even then small, time-limited, reversible and substantially outweighed by the greenhouse gas emissions these grazing animals generate.”[3]

Finally, grass fed beef not only grow more slowly but they end up at a lower final weight when they’re slaughtered, ~1100 lbs vs ~1300 lbs. After they’re butchered, this leaves 638 lbs vs 832 lbs of beef per animal. This means that to meet the same amount of demand, we’d require increasing the total number of cattle raised by about 30%, further increasing emissions and overall environmental impacts.[4]

Further - “The required 30% increase in the overall cattle population must be accompanied by large increases in the productivity of existing pastures, on the order of 40%–370%, to avoid clearing additional native vegetation or competition with the human food supply.”[1]

[1] https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aad401

[2] https://climate.mit.edu/ask-mit/why-do-we-compare-methane-ca...

[3] https://tabledebates.org/sites/default/files/2022-04/fcrn_gn... [4] https://extension.okstate.edu/fact-sheets/carbon-footprint-c...

[4] https://extension.okstate.edu/fact-sheets/carbon-footprint-c...

[5]https://extension.sdstate.edu/grass-fed-beef-market-share-gr....
How to Make a Square Hole for a Carriage Bolt
I'd argue calling the water a machine and hedonism, you never left Catholicism.
I know this is not actually the question you ask, but.. not the range?
Have you looked at the NeoNate 6500D? It has a range of 800m (thats 2650ft in freedom units). I know you have big houses in the US but..

Edit: Didnt see the video part, sorry. I wont have any of the online models in my house

Edit2: Seems like Neonate has a video model with 300m range (approx 950ft). Dont known if thats enough. Anyway I can vouch for the brand, super babymonitors. Think its the most commonly used in Denmark
If you are a non native English speaker you will notice shifts in how things are pronounced when put together, some of whiicht are just not written down, like pronouncing "a" as "ei" or "a" or "an" (this one written down )
Buy prepared food online, and get delivered crap. What a surprise!
Wow. I never thought of it from that light. Honestly, that is a problem. You're smuggling in pre-formed language into the thought experiment with its own rich meaning.
Not to mention unexpected pronounciations like colonel, squirrel, buoy...
Towards Helpful Robots: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances
Look at any of the pictures of Hunter from it?

Or how some people found a backup of his phone and got videos of Hunter?

You probably never saw those because most of those are suppressed, too, but it's out there. Hunter misreads the scale with the 20g or so of white powder on it.
I think that structure will be helpful, and you can also easily pass substrings. (With null-terminated strings, you can easy cut off some characters from the beginning of the string, but not from the end. Passing both the length and the pointer together allows to easily do both, as well as allowing passing strings containing null characters.) I think that this is better than Pascal strings, due to being able to make substrings like this.

(Also the structure can be passed by value (without a pointer to the structure), which also allow to easily use in other function, e.g. to convert a null-terminated string or Pascal string into this structure, without allocating additional memory.)
With positive pressure and small holes, it would be hard for bio to get in and foul it.

Generally you are more worried about biofouling on water intakes, with good reason.
I agree! Hangul is the most interesting writing system I’ve studied so far (I’m also fluent in Japanese and can read/write kanji, Hiragana, and Katakana) and it only took me 2 hours to learn. Being fluent in Japanese already made learning Korean a lot easier too, since the phonetics and grammar structures are so similar.
I don't know about Mandarin, but Korean counting words are very different from English collective nouns.

English: one animal, one person, one book

Korean: han mari, han myeong, han gweon.

Where 'han' is one, and the other three words are the counting words specific for counting animals, people, and books respectively.
I think the big difference is that the means of production to potentially be an influencer is in the hands of everyone. It doesn't mean it's likely to happen, of course, just that it appears to be more possible. In the past, you couldn't just get on TV if you wanted to.

We live in a very different world from the one of, say, 50 years ago. In today's world, there is a belief that all it takes to become successful is your mindset (i.e. ideas like "The Secret"), that coupled with everyone having the technology to actually reach people, I think gives the impression that anybody can win the lottery of fame.
Arguably, highly successful influencers tend to be very talented in some way. Hacksmith, Zachs King, Mark Rober have skills few can imitate. Mr Beast is a video producer whose creativity easily rivals those with much larger budgets.

Some less obvious talents like connecting with a large number of people over one-way videos propelled PewDiePie's and Markiplier's channels to great heights.
It appears easy to do what they do, but given such intense competition and few such successes, it's likely they provide something pretty rare that people want. (Some channels admittedly have early mover advantages).

It is possible that algorithms and crowdsourced data in Youtube and Tik Tok are more meritocratic than the more traditional ways of selecting talents.
You can give it a search in github or remoteok, remoteleaf, Angellist or even during HN : who wants to be hired post.
So he probably knows all about how to mitigate problems with brine outflows.
Nitro banners, blobs, public servers with bowling balls etc.
If you're just in a discussion it's fine but click the wrong place and it's like a teenage dream exploded.
my take is that the threshold is "amount work the mods need to do to remove comments" . Doesnt really have to do with subject if the convo is not derailed.
Yea, pretty much, well put.
My wife does a lot of garden work. When she set up TouchID in the winter, it worked fine – until the gardening season started. Then it gradually became more unreliable, until it stopped working altogether. Then early last fall, when she went to the police station for a new ID card, their fingerprint reader was unable to read a fingerprint from any finger. She was told that this is not uncommon for people who do garden work, rock climbing, or some other kinds of manual labour. Their fingerprints just wear down enough for the reader not to be able to read them. – But not completely. Burglars beware. ;-)
So the FBI has Hunter Biden's laptop and emails? And what? What is the crime exactly? I also have a laptop with emails on it. What is the proposed crime of Hunter Biden and if the FBI has evidence of a crime, why wasn't he charged?
Will age just like the famous quotes about 640K of memory is enough.
Korean uses Kanji, or Hanja, too.
Just look at what stuff we were using in the 1990s and early 2000s and still use now, then extrapolate:

Command line tools and libraries: these are the building blocks which everyone uses (maybe indirectly) but nobody appreciates.

- bash, zsh

- rsync, tar

- openssh, putty

- opengpg

- git / svn / cvs (obsolete, but still in use)

- libreadline

- objdump and similar low-level tools

System software whose internals rarely change significantly and will probably still be around in 20 years:

- Filesystems like ext4 and zfs

- Package management tools and formats like: pacman, apt, rpm/yum

- Runtime environments like JVM, CLR, Blink/V8, LuaJIT, Beam, Haskell, and presumably WASM in the future

- Bootloaders like GRUB2

Larger software projects (the internals of these might change more quickly over time though):

- Linux kernel, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, OpenWRT, Haiku

- gtk3

- ffmpeg, mplayer, vlc, blender

- Wayland

- Sqlite, PostgreSQL

- LLVM

- Inkscape, Gimp, ImageMagick

- Wireshark, GNURadio

Other options to consider (less popular, but might need more help):

- Thunderbird (not everyone wants to use a webmail client)

- input methods like fcitx (these might change over time though)

- Fontforge

- CUPS and other printing and scanning utilities

- flashrom
What's the implicit problem though with people becoming famous from their house in their pajamas vs becoming famous for being in a highly marketed movie?

Can you be certain people worship actors because the actor cultivated a skill? Or rock stars? Maybe influencers are just laying bare the shallow intoxication of fame without a "skill" to mask what a lot of nonsense it is.

After all, you can worship Odsy Osbourne and have a para social relationship with him. But if you really respect music, you can go down to your local bar and actually meet people who play nearly just as well but without the glitz and glow.
Archaeological mystery: Ancient Elamite script from Iran deciphered?
Joe Biden had been in the public eye for 50 years, releasing tax returns, etc. Hunter Biden was not running for office.

Perhaps it is possible that this laptop, at the time completely unverified, had some magic smoking gun to bring down a 50 year career, magically showing up in a random place 10 days before the election. But obviously the much, much more likely situation is that it was either fake or insignificant.

If it were my social network and I cared about my responsibility to society, I don’t see why not promoting this story is at all controversial. It isn’t like Facebook is the entire internet, people still were reading about it.
Hugeness maybe not, but highly developed internal market always helps.

One of the overlooked factors that the author mentions briefly is metallurgy. Better metals translate to better machines. Even today, quite a lot of our technological effort is stymied by metallurgy. For example, China still struggles to develop a reliable jet engine for its fighters, and it took a lot of time for SpaceX to stop Raptor2 combustion chambers from melting in the heat. (IDK if this has been fully solved actually. But they are conducting static fires.)

A steam engine needs to tolerate a lot of pressure. Ancient metals couldn't do that.
Reason to be skeptical:

For the last 10 years (?) or so most everybody has a mobile phone with high-quality camera in it and most people carry their phone with them all the time.

Shouldn't that mean that the quality and quantity of UFO evidence should have exploded since about 10-15 years ago? But I haven't seen any articles about how much more and how much better quality UFO evidence we have now that anybody whose sees a UFO can take a snapshot or video of it. Further when a group of people see a UFO, they could each take their own video of it taken with their different cameras.

If I saw a UFO I would certainly try to take a video of it.
Everyone should have fun all the time is not really a realistic goal, period. I don't think playing games is universally fun either. Games can be quite boring.

Games do often promote the concept of winning and losing, however.
This service requires Starlink v2 satellites, which require Starship to fly to orbit (regularly). An orbital test of Starship should take place this year, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s pushed for next year. And there’s a long way from an orbital test to frequently launching Starships with Starlink v2 satellites.
This is a common scheme with certain predatory "locksmiths" in Germany that charge extortionate fees for lockout calls, and aggressively demand it be paid cash on the spot (legally, you are entitled to pay by invoice for this service).

They extremely aggressively game Maps and AdWords to ensure that their numbers are on top of results.

Most of the guys they send out also I don't think are qualified locksmiths, based on the level of damage they tend to do when gaining access!

When I lived there I simply told my friends to call me instead, I'd get their doors open for a few beers.
I'm telling you that, unless you manage to _reliably_ automate _everything_, you need something like 6 personal to generate a permanent watch (probably more due to vacation/sickness/etc). This is kind of the minimal requirement for having any redundancy for unforeseen situations _at all_. And it is only a factor of 3 below the current crewing levels. Which gives you a factor of 3 more ships.

Unless you are willing to risk loosing the ship due to a 1-in-1000 event which your automation did not take into account, then this is your limit. And ships are expensive, even compared to officer salaries. And those generate most of the crewing costs anyways. So if you have to pay 6 officers, adding 2-3 for the engine to require less dock-time and 12 ratings really doesn't push up your costs that much (especially not compared to the capital cost). But you get a lot of redundancy.

So yeah, I would say most of the economically viable automation has been done

But this has been a surprisingly interesting rabbit hole, thanks for that.

There are different numbers for ships around starting with 50k [0] on the low end and the high end is 100k [1] being operated by between 1.5m [2] and 1.9m [3] personell. At the outer edge this would give 40 people per ship. Whereas reports put the number more at 20-25 [4]. The last one also mentions that there are requirements, by law, which typically require something like 6 people (often with nationality requirements) to be on board.

All sources e.g.
[0] https://www.statista.com/statistics/264024/number-of-merchan...
[1] https://hbs.unctad.org/merchant-fleet/
[2] https://www.ics-shipping.org/shipping-fact/shipping-and-worl...
[3] https://www.ics-shipping.org/press-release/russian-and-ukrai...
[4] https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Docume...
There isn't a price tag on my light switch. Also light is of course a must have, news articles or chatrooms aren't.

If I could use micropayments this way and be sure that the final price is

a) somewhat predicable

b) usually not ruinous

It would work better.

Cloud Services for companies like AWS are using this mode and it's working well for them.

But I have a feeling it's not easy/legal to do away with the immediate price tag for consumers. At the very least it would require the a constant price per "thing" and a hard spending limit.
I always love when it's clear that nobody has ever actually tried an option.

I once paid for internet via public wifi for a time. When my CC expired and it was time to renew... that was literally impossible because of how they redirected you to their paywall when you tried to visit anything else. Even if you were trying to go to the billing page to renew. So you literally couldn't pay them. Oh, and even if you had other internet access, that wouldn't work either, because the billing site was nowhere on the open internet, only via the municipal wifi.

Or there are similar loops in Amazon's help system, where they make it hard to get a human and it just loops you around the same sets of options when you tell it that it's not working right. So you have to swear at it to see if you can trigger the algorithms to detect frustration and get you out.

And those aren't even deliberate, like the dark patterns some places engage when you try to cancel a service.
prööt prällällää
The answer is simple: don't copy/paste commands, or at the very least review what you're about to execute after pasting. Reasonable terminals give you a warning that you're about to paste multiple lines and let you read the text before okaying.

Besides this is irrelevant. Websites have always been able to do what you're describing, because copying is a gesture. This bug doesn't change that.
The thing is nobody cares whatsoever what they communicate because you just can't legally do that most places. You can write depending on mood box may contain poo, dead rabbits, or live bobcat instead of phone and when you deliver anything but what the user paid for intact and functional their bank is going to take their money back and whomever is taking payments for you may opt to stop doing so if it happens too much.

Ultimately "YOU CAN'T DO THAT" just doesn't mean you CAN do that as long as the letters are big enough bold enough or red enough. It means YOU CAN'T DO THAT.

You cannot offer goods that don't work on a website where you anticipate people paying with their paycal mastercard visa or amex and expect them not to exercise terms that must exist by law because the alternative to someone doing the easy thing and yoinking their money relatively cheaply back over the wire isn't the incompetent OEM keeping the money its waiting for a very expensive lawsuit wherein the customer takes back not only their $99 but the $5000 it cost them to collect their $99. If enough people do that ultimately they ruin you and people come to take all your tinker toys and auction them to pay your debts.

The actual alternative is to have an actual signed contract with prospective "developers" for access to equipment. There isn't a blurb you can put on a website that will serve.
Check out Norse, basically the same flights as Norwegian had.
It's very expensive to charge someone $1. It wouldn't make much sense to charge $1 / month for a service like that; you'd want to charge $12 / year.
But in French, we skip 1900 in most 19xx years. I wonder when we'll start doing it for the 20xx years.