skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I wouldn’t use it. Not interested in outsourcing my identity to another entity - at least not with social login features.

But I’m a minority in that regard.
What are the chances?
Looks like your friend is traveling to beautiful Vanuatu ;) https://nomadcapitalist.com/expat/the-best-non-extradition-c...
“Secretaries” that might be more related to shrinking women’s pay gap and empowerment of women
Thank you for tao of tea. They introduced me to Puer, which became my go-to for a long time.
20 years in SF, and I can promise you that the extreme left is not the establishment here. As an example, we had a relatively progressive prosecutor who tried occasionally to hold cops to account. After an acrimonious campaign, he was just recalled with extensive support from a chunk of the establishment. His replacement, selected by the mayor, volunteered as an active proponent in the recall. Except that it came out later that she received $100k in "consulting" fees from a billionaire via a sister organization to the recall campaign: https://www.kron4.com/news/bay-area/reports-sf-da-brooke-jen...

San Francisco gets a lot of press as being radical, but the government strikes me as pretty middle-of-the-road and wealth-focused. i can't think of a policy here that would be out of place in any other sensibly run city in the US. And we're definitely to the right of places like Copenhagen and Amsterdam. And that goes back a long way; CA's current governor was a centrist mayor here back in the day.
https://ludii.games/lud/games/Lielow.lud deciphered with https://ludii.games/downloads/LudiiGameLogicGuide.pdf

(equipment {
(board (square 10))
(piece "Disc" Each)
})

The board is 10x10

(start {
(place "Disc1"
(difference
(difference
(expand (sites Bottom) steps:2)
(expand (sites Bottom) steps:1)
)
(sites Outer)
)
)
(place "Disc2"
(difference
(difference
(expand (sites Top) steps:2)
(expand (sites Top) steps:1)
)
(sites Outer)
)
)
})

One row of pieces on the top, and one row of pieces on the bottom (?). I wonder if parametric definition (like a list comprehension) would be clearer... Interesting approach nevertheless.
I mean are most commercials or corporate brochures or startup websites “art” in some meaningful way? Not really..

What people are worried about is the death of the professional artist job market, not art as a concept
All 30 members of The Party supported the party line?
I've always had a sensitivity.
>I didn't realize Garry was so crypto-y. Now as the President and CEO of YC where everyone constantly says "Make something people want", "Solve a real problem", I'm curious for him to chime in to the 'What's a real use-case for crypto?' debate.

That's why I think YC under Garry will pivot to something like: "Catch the next big thing" even if the next big thing is a scam and an environmental disaster.

I look forward to YC becoming full-time crypto shills and pump and dump scams.
They are! Very!

Thank you. Fixed both :)
In most countries you do not get to keep accidentally transferred funds and attempting to do so can constitute theft. If you receive money you know you shouldn't have, call the bank, don't spend it.
Why is crypto.com able to retrieve their funds in this case, but crypto hacks around the world result in customers being told there's no recourse? Doesn't appear crypto.com paid back the $34M that was stolen from customers in the hack a few months back.

The crypto crowd sure like regulations at the most unexpected times.
Hmm? Details?
"Excuses"? Seriously?
yep, exactly. if IRC was on the web, back in the day, I feel it would have been a lot like discord.
Convert the value into high-value commodities (e.g. gold, diamonds); get those insured; and then have a friend steal them from you. Collect the insurance money. (You’ll use this to repay the transfer.)

Have the friend fence the goods. (In the case of diamonds, intentionally write down the serial numbers incorrectly so that your friend can launder them without being caught.)

Put the cleaned money into an offshore account owned by a shell company with identity protection. Contract your services to said shell company with a very high rate.
The article matches my own experience porting some media processing code from SSE to NEON for the Apple Silicon transition. I had a library with C and SSE implementations and I wanted to write a NEON implementation with the goal of outperforming the C version (on any arch), as well as the SSE versions running native (on an Intel CPU), ported (via a intrinsic compatibility library), and runtime translated (via Rosetta 2).

I started studying the SSE code. This ended up not being useful and even counter productive. I only began to make good progress when I let myself forget what I knew about the SSE implementation and instead used the C code as a starting point. By letting myself back up and think about what the code was actually doing at a high level, and then thinking about how best to write that in NEON, I was able to come up with quite different approaches compared to the SSE code, and in the end the NEON version was much faster.
They might have done the rational thing and tried to make money using the funds mistakenly transfered to them. It's unlikely the courts will demand they turn over gains due to the increase in the value of real estate.
>Wisdom is the opposite of efficiency. It is the opposite of a solution. Wisdom will not make your life more comfortable.

Wisdom is a distillation of knowledge from the past and present. Wise choices about where to put your efforts, will greatly increase your chances of reaching your goals, and finding satisfaction.
reinvest and then use the winnings to buy the entire company in a hostile takeover. and then dissolve it.

company gone, no entity to pursue the lawsuit.
Front-facing FaceID is periodically beaming IR light at the user, even when not doing an authentication.

Lidar is only on the iPhone Pro rear cameras.

clutches mmWave-less FaceID-less LIDAR-less iPhone SE3
I love my framework laptop. Runs linux perfectly, and has upgradable components.

The arch guide is also excellent. https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Framework_Laptop
They were asked because the government has no legal grounds to force them. In this situation, Facebook and Twitter are not legally obligated to take action. If they took action, it is because they chose to. In China, companies are legally obligated to take action whether they want to or not. It’s not the same thing.
While some Mormons may have "weird puritan" values, simply wanting censorship options for some movies is something that many families would like to have, not just Mormons. And I don't think it's necessarily puritan to want to cut out that one or two scenes of a head exploding in an otherwise family friendly flick.
I think you'd probably always want to go with T4's since they are the same price unless there's just no availability for them.
Too bad AMD doesn't seem to be doing well with USB4 so far. And with a "basic" motherboard now priced at $125 I'd rather skip it anyway.
As a computer vision researcher who has worked with these T2I generators, this is more spot on. I think a lot of people are making a lot of assumptions without having actually worked with these networks. There's also a highly fundamental problem that is not only unsolved, but we don't even have great directions to solve: alignment. Alignment is even a difficult task when you're communicating to another person. Everyone has had an experience of working with someone and they are asking you to do something (or vise versa) and there is a gross misinterpretation. That's alignment. Now try properly aligning with an "entity" that thinks nothing like you, has a vastly different set of experiences, doesn't know how to count, and has no real concept of physical mechanisms (and more).

The technology will definitely help us see a lot more unique art and a lot more amateur artists (a good thing). But it would be naive to think that artists are going away anytime soon. I'd even argue that there will be new jobs from this (prompt engineer comes to mind). It is really difficult to speculate how this technology (even as it progresses rapidly) will change the future. But considering that no one is creating machines that think like humans we will always have alignment issues. This isn't a fact that can be ignored.

It is also worth noting that if you haven't worked with these systems, that what you are seeing is extremely biased. People aren't showing their failures. But there are some twitter accounts that do: WeirdStableAI and weirddalle are probably the most famous. Of course, you can also follow Gary Marcus who is going to retweet every example of failure that he can get his hands on.

Other side note: some of these conversations remind me about how people used to talk about 3D printers
Millions and millions of dollars, years and years, and a good SEO agency.

I’ve tried reading up in competing in competitive markets and it’s nearly impossible. I’d give up unless you have the budget and/or go for something more niche. Instead of VPNs maybe go for “The First Eco-Conscious VPN” and compete with marketing and a novel idea rather than SEO. Else you’re going to have a bad time.
Here it is as a pdf: https://rifters.com/real/shorts/VampireDomestication.pdf
>Surely there is ground for "the mistake is yours, the money is gone" approach

not really. Pretty much every jurisdiction has laws regarding transaction errors, you can't just go blow a couple of millions just because someone made faulty transaction. If you notice random amounts of money in your account, don't go out and spend it.
Australians are obsessed with the property market in a way few from outside the country can understand. It is very uncommon to invest in securities here, compared to pumping more money into housing.
Completely agreed. For some of these large language models, it would take a long time before inference spend dominates training spend.
bingo.

you aren't meant to read it all, I think people miss that as well.
> As a great example of a chat service that works well for me, take a look at Zulip... but the way how all conversations are grouped into "topics" makes it so much easier to filter.

So, you're looking for a forum. :)
Lack of controls and auditing is the real news. How do you not notice $10m dollars missing? Is there anyone reviewing refunds?
The plastic lid forming machine (cup bowl lid making machine） uses blow molding or blister molding to make plastic sheets into plastic cup lids of various shapes and sizes.
I wouldn't be surprised if they're announced at CES and released next summer.
Yes, of course. Non-profits use tools just like everyone else. But they typically have small budgets, so it can be a difficult market. Good luck.
Host your own OpenStreetMap Map Tiles
It's just a chat app. You've probably used IRC, or Slack, or Teams. It's really not different from Slack in most ways in the context of your complaints. The main difference, IMO, is that slack servers are generally pretty small, with well defined groups of people, especially if you only use it within a company. Join servers that your friends or interests are in, mute channels you don't care about, join conversations that seem interesting.

> I have no idea who is talking, what is being talked about, are you and how are you suppose to follow anything, how to find information that took place 1 min ago and let alone few weeks ago

You tell what is being talked about by reading the conversation. And information that is old is not relevant. Chats are basically ephemeral. You can search for info if you know relevant keywords.

> how each message somehow takes so much vertical space.

User Settings -> Appearance:
* Message display: Compact
* Adjust chat font scaling
* Adjust space between message groups
Good lord. If the government was so committed to “suppressing” those stories as you claim, they were awfully bad at it, as anyone who ever wanted to learn about them certainly won’t shut up about it. And I don’t see black helicopters anywhere picking you up to some secret prison.

Unlike the ccp example here, where I would say they do have a great handle on what can and cannot be discussed on any public platform and dissenters are most definitely threatened with if not actually subjected to physical force.
people generally value kinda cool and useful much more than cool and mostly useless.
It may just be me, but I find Python nearly unreadable at times. Everything is just so ... slippery? Is this well written?

w for w in words if w in WORDS

There's just two concepts there, w and words, doing a whole lot. I mean, that's literally a filter, but Python refuses to embrace these things because they're supposedly confusing or hard. In F#, that would be:

List.filter (fun word -> List.contains word WORDS) words

I would of course rename WORDS and words to be something distinct rather than just differ by capitalization. The Python is confusing because the way to trace this comprehension is by starting with the w in the middle, then the w at the end, and then the w at the beginning (i.e., 2-3-1 sequence).

Also, I highly dislike using lines of code as some sort of ultimate measurement. The program is what it is, and then requires a page 5 times the length of the program to explain the program. The program should be clearer or more comments added to it or both.

The program also uses Python's "feature" of evaluating default arguments once when the function is defined as a sort of global variable, because the P function is never used by passing in a value for N. Seems clever, which is the problem with it. Lastly, function names should be more clear. "known", "P", and honestly the others are not good function names.
In the sense that the government did not suppress it. The NY Post ran the story with zero legal consequences and people in the U.S. have published and spoken continuously about it from then until now.
I think they only committed to 3 years of support, so not as good as AM4's 6(?) years
They've been doing this thing with aerial photographs for decades.

You print the latest photo on a transparency and lay it over the last one. Human eyes are really good at finding the differences.
If $10M showed up in my account unexpectedly I'd be calling both the bank and the police. You'd have to be a complete idiot to think you can play finders keepers on $10M, especially buying a house with it.

9 months is well within the regular window too. Would be different if it showed up 10 years later.
Holy shit that list is insane. A lot of those words being banned would limit you enormously if you're trying to create art.
Why would you fear 'failure' putting up code for people to look at (and maybe run) for free in case it helps them? (Put a good MIT/BSD/Apache/etc licence on your code and you are not legally liable for anything idiotic they do with it.)

Are you worried about being laughed at? Being embarrassed at some future interview/meeting? If you do stuff for the right reasons (and follow the law, etc) then anyone laughing at you is someone you don't want to work with.
The world without Softbank is not infested by monopolies, bot at all. There never were taxi medallions worth hundreds of thousand of dollars, there is no monopolistic ponzi game in real estate, the world is a perfect competition as the economics 101 predicted. If only not for Softbank ruining it for everyone right
California's legislature is gripping. What will they think of next?!
Does anyone find the same is true of conversations?

Don't get me wrong, writing is a really important part of the thinking process, but equally I find it's useful to sit down and talk things over with someone else, the act of framing my thoughts to be said, let alone responding to questions or comments, are yet more lenses to peer into the mess in my head and pull out the odd nugget I consider further.

Additionally each of these highlights different thoughts and ideas, so I don't find I can just substitute one for the other.

That's not even touching on the value of more spirited debate =)...
That's exactly what companies like RedBox do/did. They would send buyers out to Walmarts and Best buys all over the country to buy up copies.

I think they eventually stopped doing it just to appease the production companies and avoid their frivolous lawsuits.
> Which seems completely fine.

Google probably doesn't share the same rosy outlook. Long-running investigations that do not result in charges will be bad PR. The headline "Google shared private data on 100s of innocent users with law enforcement" will not be received well.
Because companies go bankrupt by not having the money, while the woman bought a house approximately equal in value to the cash.

If she had gambled it all at the casino, they'd have no recourse either: She might go to jail, but they wouldn't get their money back.
It's very nice, especially the dot and smiles; it looks like you're playing with a mouse. You did an amazing job; it's very entertaining and funny.
Why don’t we trust the experts? (2016)
Armchair moment: I have a _really_ hard time believing there could ever be a cost-effective way to make space Solar worthwhile. For the price of one football-sized field of solar panels in space (which I’m guessing on the low end might be $5-10 billion? Probably more though) how many terrestrial solar plants 10x that size could you build? And how much battery capacity could you build to store it over night, eliminating the major advantage of space solar anyways
You jest, but if I hired a spate of “senior” contractors who all had no idea how to hang sheetrock, I might start testing them for basic skills too.
That might be how you want it to work. But isn't how the laws of Australia work.
Large off-ramp stop signs are clearly an edge case nobody should expect to be handled well. /s
stop NAMING everything "Nix".
The US population won’t be shrinking in any of our lifetimes. Migrant labor trafficking will simply adjust accordingly.
> I tend to really avoid external (not written by me) dependencies, because I have had many problems with other people's code.

Exactly, I'd rather write 1500 lines of brand new C code to parse Wavefront OBJ files than import 300000 lines of Assimp [1].

OTOH, I'd rather import 2000 lines of mikktspace[2] code than attempt to reinvent (or even understand) that black magic.

[1] https://github.com/assimp/assimp
[2] http://www.mikktspace.com/
As a developer, very often I'm locked into a problem (algorithms, trigonometry, "stuff you'd think you'd know by now, dumbass", etc.)

The only way for me to get out of it is doodling it down: write the keywords, link them, circle them around, draw the thing, depict it in 3D, flow chart it, boxes, structures, swimlanes, whatever.

It's like mansplaining it to my brain.

Works 11/10 times.

Always have a clean pad with a pen handy.
LOL. This guy doesn’t realize what DALL-E is going to be like in 18 months.
Yeah. The well designed whimsy was fun, but the grey text on a black background with rainbows flying all around was not.
Are you training new models from scratch or just fine tuning LLMs? I'm from the CV side and we tend to train stuff from scratch because we're still highly focused on finding new architectures and how to scale. The NLP people I know tend to use LLMs and existing checkpoints so their experiments tend to be a lot cheaper.

Not that anyone should think any aspect (training nor inference) is cheap.
That would be a non-Euclidian (ie. curved) universe?

Maybe it is possible to construct a non-Euclidean universe for sound, by modifying properties of the propagation medium as a function of space or time?
no kidding. thanks, the mention of the court case and the ruling in favor of crypto.com in the article didn't make that clear.

it doesn't matter what the law says in comparison to what actually should happen, and what really matters.

in this case the law sides the rich, instead of siding against the incompetent people who made the mistake.

that doesn't make the law right, or moral, or even justifiable, it just means that the rich likely control legislation in Australia.

it's still crypto.com's fault, and their own money wasn't important enough to them for any validation in the form which the operator entered the wrong data into the "amount" field. they fucked up, no matter what the law says.

the money wasn't stolen, and should not need to be returned. the company that lost the money (literally) gifted it to the customer by mistake, and didn't catch it's own mistake for SEVEN months.
Surely there should be a statute of limitations on that. The idea that someone could demand money from me for a mistake they made seven months ago sounds ridiculous, no matter how big the mistake.
Fantastic word salad you have there, managing to avoid the entire question posed to you. Shows that you have no cogent argument, just a bunch of grievances. I’m sorry to hear of your problems.
Australian law has the concept of "unjust enrichment". If you receive a payment that is mistaken you have a prima facie obligation to make restitution.
On my Intel i5-4590T (8G RAM) it takes around 5-6 minutes to generate with 32 steps, swapping to disk as it does consume around 13G memory total. You don't get real-time feedback but it's very usable and fun to play with. I wish there was an option to force a manual seed though.
Crypto.com fully reimbursed all 483 accounts that were hacked [1].

[1] https://www.coindesk.com/business/2022/01/20/cryptocom-says-...
MIT OpenCourseWare’s top lectures of all time
No.

I mean, you need some kind of trust, somewhere. Maybe you don't have to trust the service provider, if it provides some type of TPM attestation traced to the key of someone you do trust.

On the other hand, they have physical access. Even with efforts at remote attestation, etc, the game is lost.
Most models actually being used are linear regressions and decision trees
Honestly confused why the concept of some arbitrary "order of operations" was ever entertained at all. You'd think ye olde algebraists would have recognized the ambiguity as a glaring problem right away. After a bit of light searching I'm still struggling to find any historical reasoning behind it.
Wasn't this just the plot of Heat (1995) ?

Or something to that extent.
I think Scalia is right in this descent, but applying the same textualist logic to many other decisions he made doesn't make nearly as much sense. In other words, his textualism leads to a lot of "there's no rule that says a dog can't play basketball" type decisions.
Interesting, yeah I had one or two good moments after spending a few hours wrangling my interfaces.

But the frustration left a worse impression than did the benefits. Perhaps if I was being paid to do it and had mentors around to ask for help. But I couldn't find any good advice online.
The real reason seems to be that getting onto the ACH system is actually work.

Once you're in it's an open field, but getting there requires a lot of vetting.

There have been exploits that I've read about, but they tend to be hushed up because people don't particularly want people to know how insecure the system actually is. The exploit I read about had someone pulling a couple of dollars from a few million accounts. In aggregate they made a lot, and most people aren't going to necessarily notice a few missing dollars.

Of course, everything is traceable. But I never did hear of a resolution of this particular issue.

As an aside, eChecks have a different issues, mainly because they're sort of a hacked-in solution. For example, you can't stop payment on an eCheck, since there's no check number; banks just can't do it.
the highest EV outcome for her was to hit the Wynn
For how long will making a private website be viable? Like it seems you will need army of lawyers soon. Hobbyists can't and won't keep on top of all of these rules.