skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
How hard is it to use multiple cameras to gauge depth perception, as per human binocular vision?

(Serious question, I know nil about machine vision)
Sorry. Each 10 second clip is a derivative work of the whole. So you can't sub-license portions of the work without permission.

Just like you can't lend out individual chapters of a book....
You can side load YouTube tweaked apps. You’ll have to refresh the app every 7 days without a workaround or dev account but altserver makes it painless after the first time.
I mean, it's comedy, it's obviously not hateful.

The whole point was that all the main characters were stereotypical nerds and each displayed a different type social difficulty. I mean Sheldon was obviously supposed to be somewhere on the autistic spectrum, how is that not ableist or whatever?

It was also apart of his character arc! If you watch the show, Raj eventually overcomes his fear of talking to women and ends up dating multiple women (sometimes at the same time) later in the show.

There are a ton of jewish stereotypes present in the show as well, but they are hilarious, and > 50% of the cast is jewish (as well as almost all of the producers AND the director), and obviously they were not offended and CHOSE to write and direct the show that way. My point being, it's just comedy and if you actually watch the whole thing, it has a good message.
I think it's pretty safe to say that people will act less on something if they feel it's bad (due to being educated like it is), even behind closed doors. Especially since this makes it harder to find a partner.
That's why you test-drive a car and/or have it inspected. If it is a clunker and the price of the inspection approaches the price of the car you can just take the risk. In any other case an hours worth of time of a competent mechanic will tell you all you need to know. After that the risk is yours if you decide to go through with the purchase. If something does turn up that wasn't disclosed the seller will usually be happy to adjust the price. And if not you are only out the inspection fee. Typically $50 to $150 so well worth it on any vehicle purchase that is in the price range where 'engine fell out' feels like it isn't on the menu of expected events.
You don't create an ability to have redemption, forgiveness, rehabilitation, or regret. The first step to get someone to change their mind is to remove the dependency of them having an income on said philosophy, and one of the best ways to do that is to give them a chance to not work there anymore and move past it. By forcing them into an association ghetto, you create stronger supporters for the group you dislike, because they have no other options left.

Also everyone's personal set of shit companies doesn't overlap, so it's very easy for no one to get hired fairly quickly, and sometimes people chose the unpopular place out of necessity vs. choice at the time.

A large amount of employees people want to hire have probably worked at a company that people didn't like at one time or another. It's pretty easy to think of a set of nerds who don't like that you've worked at any one of google, microsoft, apple, amazon, facebook, netflix, robinhood, stripe, hospital system, any bank/finance/fintech, government, etc. Pretty much the only companies left are the ones that are not relevant enough to do anything to the world that would lead to someone being a hater in the first place.
I would say your best bet is to restore your SP6. It's not so bad, I replaced the battery and screen on a SP5 a few years back. The screen is hard to remove but the rest is extremely straightforward.
Weren’t the small to medium businesses already mostly using stock images anyway?

If anyone was to be worried I’d think it would be Getty Images.
> When the Netflix-produced Korean show Squid Game went viral and won awards worldwide, many Chinese netizens were asking on social media — when can a Chinese TV show be recognized in that way?

Fascinating. I mean, the answer is obvious to everyone else in the world, but it'll be interesting to watch them figure it out over the next few decades.

Is Squid Games even allowed in China?
> P.S. I find I need to write more

You're doing just fine :)
Overall health and life quality declines with the introduction of agriculture. Disease run rampant. Teeth rot. Social inequality and group violence increases.

... But population growth explodes because of the reliable supply of food and the ability to be settled in one place and also the ability to wean babies sooner for the above reasons.

It turns out people will trade many valuable things -- including freedom and their own health -- in exchange for food security and stability and the knowledge that they don't die this winter because the neighbouring tribe overhunted all the deer and the fish didn't spawn this year.
My father died last June and apart from the initial shock (which was mostly me not thinking about the fact that he died), the biggest thing was that he's no longer with me. I used to visit occasionally, and we'd talk for hours about stuff, but that will no longer be possible. The past will always be memories, but the sadness comes because we won't have any interaction in the future. The whole idea of him won't evolve, and you will no longer discover anything new about him (people talking about him don't really matter). What makes me sad is all the little stuff that will no longer take place because he is just not here.

But I'm used to the idea of everyone having an unknown, finite time on earth. So while the loss can be huge, I try to make every moment I spend with my family, positive and meaningful.
I am quite excited about digital sovereignty, but not excited enough to run a script from a website whose only visible content is the text "sh <(curl hahsbang.sh | gpg)". And the 4+ pages of script in the page source are not enticing me to proceed...
Agreed, sometimes you can literally replace the phrase with "it's not important to me" and shock yourself
At this point I don't even care what it looks like. Flat can work just as well as not flat as long as it's consistent.

A stop sign is the definition of flat: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f9/ST... but it has a border which separates it from the rest of the world. If it were a button when you've clicked it once you will know where it is and how big it is.

Random text with no differentiation from the rest of the page is a big reason why I've lost the habit of clicking hyperlinks. If it doesn't look like it will do something I will assume it does nothing.
From the textual inversion guy's own comment on Twitter

>The objective is similar, but it's: (1) A different approach - they also fine tune the model itself, and they get much much better identity preservation!
It’s mostly all on discord. These are the two most active ones with devs on board
https://discord.gg/QNxzjUfu
https://discord.gg/nZ3hkXRV
Hubris. Queue up the videos of Trump pointing that out to laughter.
Well, I have no idea. But I attended a taping of a sitcom once, and the way it worked is they had mics hanging above all the parts of the audience. Before they show they had a warm up comic, which both put us in the laughing mood and gave them a chance to record our particular audience laughing really hard.

Then when the show was recorded, we actually did laugh pretty hard. You know how you laugh louder when you're at a comedy show or at a movie theater than when you're home alone watching the same thing? Because of peer pressure? It was like that. You laugh harder in the audience.

And then they would "enhance" the laughing by taking the recording of us from earlier and playing it over the spots where we laughed live, especially if they end up using a second or third take, since were didn't laugh as hard.

Also I remember in our episode there was a joke where as the live audience we could see the payoff right away, but on the TV the camera did a slow pull back to reveal the joke. They added in our recorded laughter for that. I remember because I laughed at home but not in the studio.

So it's sort of a combination. But except in those rare cases they don't really add in laughter where there was none. They just enhance the live audience.
> the author has never tried breakfast tea which has almost as much caffeine

Tea time is a better cultural marker than the drink itself.

And probably why you jumped to breakfast tea, because you're thinking of something occupying the same role as a morning cup of coffee.

Most people wouldn't have a coffee break at 4:30 in the evening, but a tea break at 4:30 is perfectly okay.

But the whole point of a "tea time of the soul" is to contemplate over tea before drinking it. Coffee offers no such moment to wait for it to cool, because a big cup would be too much coffee, but just enough tea.

I thought that's the actual point of the article too.

And then you start back at what you were doing, but a little more deliberate about it.
One or more of the cast mates of these youtube sailing channels must look good in a bikini--otherwise the algo doesn't show it to me.
They failed because they were heresies--elevating the material above the spiritual & dragging the Gospel down into the muck of economics & policy.

> Remember this: Whoever sows sparingly will also reap sparingly, and whoever sows generously will also reap generously. Each man should give what he has decided in his heart to give, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver.

- 2 Corinthians 9:6-7
That's why I said "90% of operations" :)
Even in cases like that (SQL is sometimes supposed to be all caps), it's pretty trivial to either make it all caps, or to throw caps on another layer and quickly access it.

It might actually justify it's positional priority in your case if you're literally switching between CAD and normal communication a ton, but even then i suspect you wouldn't mind it somewhere else.
Among the other detractors, you miss a fairly important distinction.

Not being an epidemiologist stands in their favor.

Most other scientists are taking the data they receive at face value instead of taking the time to evaluate if the underlying assumptions are valid.

You respond emotionally and preemptively assume they are wrong.

It wasn't "anti-vaxxers" that employed hundreds of thousands of social media posters to disseminate the official message.

I feel genuinely sorry for people so deep in the wool.

Edit:
At the present moment, it is impossible to determine if such vehement opposition is not also paid
Indeed, it always seems that it's not the prejudiced party being offended but rather others on their belief. It is similar to the comments about, for example, wearing a kimono and it being deemed cultural appropriation by everyone except Japanese people who gladly welcome sharing their culture. Can they show me even a few Indians who were offended by Raj?
Please stop with the existing sockpuppets as well.
If you believe that there are such things as universal human rights, and that they remain rights regardless of whoever says they aren't, and you think free speech is one of those rights, then yes, it's a bad thing. Not everybody does, and those who do cannot always agree on the details. But, some people do.
There are also bisexual people who might end up with a same sex partner when free choose, but go with a heterosexual relationship due to societal pressure.
That's not really a "logical extreme", that's a straw man and an obvious ploy to do something you're not supposed to be able to do.

I think a reasonable person would see that what you describe is an attempt to make an end run around both the spirit and letter of the law. But what VidAngel was doing was "one copy = one view", which is IMO entirely reasonable. There is zero moral difference between mailing someone a Bluray disc (with instructions -- either automated or manual -- of what parts to skip) vs. keeping that disc in a warehouse and streaming the (censored) contents to exactly one person at a time.
A 10 second clip of a movie that is designed to be stitched with 710 other 10 second clips isn't fair use, it's just copyright infringement.

"In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:[8]

the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
the nature of the copyrighted work;
the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. "
There's not a law that forces them to scan.

Amazon isn't scanning anything, where are the damages paid out to those using AWS for CSAM?
To be fair, the world only just got their hands on this (and by world I mean people with decent hardware), so too soon to say what the ramifications will be.
You really have no idea what the point of comedy is, do you? Just in case, it's not to provide you with statistically accurate portrayal of the population of India (or any other place, for that matter). It's creating ridiculously exaggerated portrayals of common problems and depicting them in comedically outlandish way. It's not a documentary about the virility or Indian males, most of whom I am confident are utter studs. It's supposed to be grossly a-typical, that's the whole point. That's like complaining clowns are offensive because nobody in real life has a red nose like that. That's the whole point of the thing!
I think the gp may have been referring to the LHC, a scientific mega-project completed in 2010, ie not long ago. ITER is still progressing. These projects are “optional” and history suggests that Europe can do fantastical and terrible things when sufficiently motivated. We’ll see how truly motivated Europe is!
This is an interesting question.

I would say at the very least it offers an extra layer of authentication over ssh, so it would require a wireguard bug and ssh bug to cause damage. That alone provides extra security!

Another helpful thing, is that wireguard doesn't respond to invalid connection attempts at all. An invalid connection attempt appears as if you are accessing a port that nothing is listening on! Because of this, you can't detect what port wireguard is listening on, or even if it's running at all, so mass scanning the internet for wireguard listening ports and attempting connections is extremely ineffective.

There are probably other aspects that make it safer. You can read a lot about wireguard here https://www.wireguard.com/papers/wireguard.pdf
Actually, Reagan is misquoting there.[1] Something like that is often attributed to either Huey Long or Sinclair Lewis, but neither actually wrote that. Or even close. The closest match is from Sinclair Lewis' book "It Can't Happen Here": "He was afraid that the world struggle today was not of Communism against Fascism, but of tolerance against the bigotry that was preached equally by Communism and Fascism. But he saw too that in America the struggle was befogged by the fact that the worst Fascists were they who disowned the word “Fascism” and preached enslavement to Capitalism under the style of Constitutional and Traditional Native American Liberty."

That book is very relevant today.

[1] https://quoteinvestigator.com/2017/07/28/flag/
Ryzen 9 has always been >$500 HEDT without the HEDT socket. I assume Genoa will cost even more.
"Writing is thinking. To write well is to think clearly. That's why it's so hard." -- David McCullough, in an interview in 2002.

RIP David.
Unverified clickbait gets more engagement. Almost by definition you get engagement from the people who identify with the unverified clickbait because it reinforces their world-view, and engagement from the people who recognize it as unverified clickbait because it challenges their world-view.
Yeah, I just didn't know if that control was part of this project or a standard part of the website.
Trustworthy DNS seems so critical to security, I erred on the side of PiHole on a pi at home, self cloud hosting my DNS scarred me a bit.
writing is one of the only ways I can think these days, along with talking to others and sounding out ideas.
Clever and carefully researched, yes, but by coincidence, no.
Not exactly. Both are overnight, but ACH has 60 days period to reverse. I've had money held for the entire 60 days period in the past.
The basic reason for octave equivalence is not from human subjectivity. It's from the fact that something that repeats "x" times is also something that repeats "x/2" times, eg a sequence such as:

ABCABCABCABCABCABC

Can be thought of as "ABC" repeated 6 times or "ABCABC" repeated 3 times. If you replace the letters with numbers, you can treat the numbers as samples of a sound wave.

Just to be clear: the magical number here is 2 (not 12 or 8 or 7) since "octave equivalence" refers to the fact that you can multiply a frequency by 2 and get the same note.

Unless the sound is a perfect sine wave, there isn't a particular frequency associated with it due to these alternative interpretations.
Resignation Tips and Templates from Levels.fyi
Because that's "illegal" so cloud providers can't do it.
I mean, yes lack of censorship, but there are plenty of countries with little censorship that haven't had the same level of success as Korea in TV shows either.

Look at Germany, for example. Big country, economic powerhouse, but German TV shows and movies have little broad international appeal.
The Mystery Inside Smallpox / Monkeypox Vaccines
Sure, so first place at the science fair?

There's not a hell of a lot of value in a constant barrage of hyperbolic articles telling us that the world has changed.

It's about as useful as parents telling their kids that they're the best and smartest that the world has ever seen, only to have reality tear the carpet from under their feet.

You can be encouraging and realistic at the same time.
I love this idea and hope it comes to market. Apple could easily turn it into a subscription and have the user provide their own storage (aka upsell internal storage). I was curious how users without a stationary Mac (aka a MacBook that doesn’t have ~100% uptime) but I’m sure they could create a network sharing between devices when they are on the move.

Unfortunately, iCloud works well for probably 99% of their user and, like someone in this thread said, the only people interested in this service are in this thread.
The Ryzen 9 5950x launched just under two years ago at $800. This is an improvement on those prices.

The improvements in IPC over the original Zen core of the EPYC 7281 are quite substantial, and AMD is in a much better position than it was those five long years ago.
What's Better – Model Fs or Model Ms?
They did hire TSMC staff and got sued on that pretext. They settled.
> A similar thing happened when photography was invented

Good analogy, I'd be curious how many people argue that photography being invented was a bad thing, and if at the time it was invented there were essays about how dangerous it was going to be

I'd speculate that when photography was invented, there was some gatekeeper group with a monopoly on it (to some extent true right up until digital photography became common) and so there was less vocal concern because portraiture (or whatever it's called) while evolving, still had some value capture for a small group, while recent image generation has been almost completely opened up, so there are no entrenched special interests that get to profit (and therefore more entrenched special interests whining)
It's well understood to be impossible / not there yet, the argument then shifts to "but ML is awesome so it could happen?" to which the correct response is "anything is possible but we're nowhere close"
That's not an example of what you claimed.

As far as I know the 'monarchy' dude is Yarvin. I'd be surprised if Thiel had publicly committed himself to anything so sophomoric, and it would be interesting to see an actual example.
These AI art tools model distributions based on sample data. They don’t create the underlying distributions; they need to be given (many) samples from the source distributions.

You need people even just to say if something is good or not. Standards will rise considerably as AI tools mature, and peoples’ skills with the new tools grow. Things get old real fast and people get bored quickly.

Here’s a new role: creating trademarked artistic styles. People will become tired of what eventually becomes seen as a limited set of “AI styles,” which are actually distilled from the techniques of a relative handful of human artists. So they will seek out “Natural” artists who are able to create new artistic styles. Also, the Disneys and the mega-studios will need and want to create distinctive and commercially protectable visual styles.

The legal framework and case law will have to be worked out. Think of it as “Look and Feel” on steroids. One thing’s for sure, it will create significant roles for creative IP lawyers.
No one is claiming that The Big Bang Theory is the peak of high class humor but I wouldn't say its offensive. The first example might seem offensive if you don't have any social skills but the joke is not about the eyes of Asian people, the joke is that old people, particularly in rural areas often make off hand racist comments and the awkward moments that result. The viewer is meant to relate to things they have heard their parents say rather than relating with the person reading the line.
Someone should educate you in basic manners. You made a claim, you were asked a simple and obvious question to get you to back up the claim. There is absolutely no need for the response you gave.

As to your examples, they need work.

> It is affirming the stereotype Indian males lack confidence with women.

That's a behaviour that is not linked to race.

> Raj can’t speak with women without the use of alcohol

That's an exaggeration of a character flaw, standard fare for a sitcom.

> the show constantly mocks his accent

The actor provides the accent, what does he think about it?

> worshipping of cows

Americans are - in theory at least - allowed to mock religion. That is not racist, that's rational.
Agreed. The number of IT projects I've seen delivered on time, yet sloppy and with very little re-usability. Immediate cost savings are celebrated, while long term damage and expense is hidden while senior execs quietly move on.
Yandex is the go to image search at this point. It several ducks on motorbikes (although not in the rain). You've raised technical Ai questions, but I think it's a simple as "yandex doesn't cater to pinterest and stock image spam", and therefore works.
I don't think this is really relevant. This isn't about logic or about programming, it's about trying to conform to the spirit of what the law says, and the intent behind it. The idea of copyright is "when you reproduce something, the creator should get a cut". Sure, we can argue all day what counts as a "copy" when it comes to computers, but... c'mon. One Bluray disc is bought, and one person gets to watch it. When they're done with it, someone else gets to watch it. This is how a library works. This is how Netflix's DVD-by-mail service works. But just because a computer and a network are involved, it's somehow different? No, sorry, I don't buy it.

If the law really does say what VidAngel did is wrong, then the law is wrong and should be changed. I think it should be obvious to anyone who can read that the big media companies have (successfully) fought for decades to unfairly protect their bottom line, at the expense of everyone else. That's not ok; governments should not exist to protect crappy business models. Hell, there'd still be plenty of money to be made with much more lax copyright law.