skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Why don't we just burn all these plastics in waste2energy plants?

Even with perfect recycling, the limitation seems to be on collection and separation.
And as another commenter noted, the underlying relational algebra is also not in agreement, so it is definitely not logical. I believe they wanted to mimic human language statements, but that goal hurt more than it helped.
In this specific example, I can't imagine how all of this exposed plumbing and error handling adds much value for the person reading or writing the code. In fairness, however, the Go code could easily be moved into function that does all of the dirty work and presents a minimal interface...which is what the Python example is doing:

https://github.com/docker/docker-py/blob/923e067dddc3d4b86e4...
Any chance you could point me to (preferably English) sources for this? "Major DRM company caught pirating software" should make for hilarious evidence in piracy/DRM/copyright debates.
Could I ask what kind of work you do day to day? Does it feel sluggish in comparison to Linux for that use case?
And I returned mine after learning that all the press about it not requiring a Facebook account wasn't actually accurate until today. Kind of a coincidence that the price went up $100 right before this went through.
If the product arrived defective (including security flaws), then the liability is on the manufacturer and they should fix it free of charge, because they sold you a product with a defect.

This is categorically different than software updates and feature releases - in that case, you can justify a recurring subscription, because extra value is being provided to the customer. In the bug-fixing case, the customer literally did not receive the value was promised to them (false advertising) - the bug represents an unfulfilled obligation, and the fix is not new functionality, but the fulfillment of what was already promised and paid for.
It renders in WebGL with SDFs, but rendering is a small part of the problem — placing labels along paths including curved ones, avoiding collisions etc. gets very complex very fast.
Why does it make any difference for me (a hypothetical BTC holder) how BTC is minted?

> Meaning even if the value drops at exchanges, no miner will sell below this value due to not breaking even on electricity.

It does not work like that. If you need to pay your bills you will sell BTC for whatever price it is right now. Unless you want to long BTC, but that's a different story.
To be fair, you'll find the same problem with PoW, except people are more confident in their misunderstandings.
> There are clearly some downsides to the savings of pulling ARM architecture off-the-shelf.

To be fair, its competitors are basically x86-64 boxes…
Re "dns.providers.azure", that's a third-party module, we don't maintain that. The documentation you see in the JSON docs is auto-generated from code comments (godoc) so it's the maintainer's responsibility to write good comments that can act as documentation.

Re "http.handlers.push", fair point, that one's lacking/misleading. But this is a feature that was just added to satisfy a specific need, then fell by the wayside. Mostly because now Chrome is removing support for Server Push, so we'll need to deprecate this feature, in favor of HTTP 103 Early Hints which is the effective replacement for it.

Also, in general, we tend to spend more effort on maintaining the Caddyfile docs than the JSON docs, because the large majority of users use the Caddyfile. See https://caddyserver.com/docs/caddyfile/directives/push for the push handler, complete with examples.

Re "http.authentication.providers.jwt", well again, I think that's an issue with the module's maintainer not sufficiently using godoc comments. The maintainer registered the module under two different module paths (renamed repo) so it caused a duplicate. We'll need to manually remove the duplicate from the database, I think. It might be because there's conflicting ones that no docs are shown (cause the backend which serves the API docs is confused, I dunno, it's a bug clearly, will need to dig deeper).
Step aside, Dutch people. Montenegro is the tallest nation on Earth
Because it hurts the second hand market. Now when you buy a used car you're paying new car prices for a given feature. Meanwhile, the seller can't charge a premium over a less-equipped car.
Free will is limited. For instance did you choose your parents? Did you get to choose where you would be born? So right from birth you don't have much free will. But make the best of what you got
Pretty soon they'll be against right-to-repair legislation. Just watch.
Biden is canceling up to $10K in student loans, $20K for Pell Grant recipients
'This money is literally going to be piped straight back into the economy at a much needed time.'

You remind me of this guy who was explaining to me how he would charge a battery bank with a battery charger that he plugged to a DC/AC converter, and then wire the DC/AC converter back from the battery bank, which would give him free electric power forever.
Hmm. Wouldn't sticking to any Intel CPU with an IGP be enough ? Haven't had frustrating problems since I stick to that for Linux. But I haven't been really playing on Linux for years now, I don't have the time to experiment much. If it doesn't work at first try then it's windows or console.
I think there's a significant audience that simply wouldn't play games at all if they couldn't pirate them, because they can't realistically afford to buy them. In that case, I don't think piracy costs sales, it just allows involvement in a cultural phenomenon and art that would otherwise be inaccessible. I leave it up to the reader to decide if that's a positive outcome or not.
Australia is currently reducing their transmission length (and risk of bushfires) by creating microgrids with solar and batteries for remote communities.

The battery rollout modelled, would also be able to reduce transmission bottlenecks by distributing them geographically, something the Australian grid has been encouraging for a few years now.
In California that is the law. Cars cannot pass a bike if they will be less than 3 feet from the bike.
In C, "a[x]" is effectively syntactic sugar for just "*(a+x)" (conversion rules for "+" means you don't need the sizeof). It also means you can reverse it and write e.g. "5[somearray]" if you really want to make developers want to throw rocks at you.
Micromanagement by a VP who has a fantasy that "everyone abandoning WFH to be in the office 40 hours a week will become super-collaborative and super-productive", despite the majority of our team being spread around the entire world and such super-collaboration never happening in the 4 years I've been here even when everyone's in the office. And this on top of multiple people from our team quitting, leaving us with only 3 people who know front-end development during a full project rewrite.

...so, my entire job is my most recent work-related frustration >_>
> I would suggest to stop spamming the HN comment section and read the introductory articles people helpfully linked you to.
The proposed regulations are pretty complex, but it appears to also have a transitional strategy where PHEVs (plug-in hybrids) can count as ZEVs for this quota. During the transition years, the rules shift in terms of requiring more battery-only range from the PHEV to count as one ZEV, with a way to have lesser range PHEVs count as a fractional ZEV in the fleet. E.g. they require 70 miles of range for full credits, and partial credits for 43 miles of range.

I can't speak to economic feasibility, but with the Toyota RAV4 being one of the most popular cars in the US and already being available as a PHEV, it doesn't seem that far-fetched to have these kinds of vehicles becoming a large portion of those sold.
In case you haven't realized it, that interview was a spoof. It never happened.
What you seem to be suggesting is that, there's some collective with an immutable interest in maintaining ETH-stability, ETH-usefulness?
Fast food for the metaverse (possibly satire, guerrilla marketing, or both)
Comparing developed nations to America is kinda unfair, but ok :) My point was that just because somebody is a landlord it's not the root of all evil. (I'm not one).

Governments can and do create programs to support families (too bad for singles in my country) but at the end getting all this for free is probably a utopia.

Affordable home ownership exists everywhere, but nobody wants to move to most of those places, people need more than a roof above their heads, but that comes at a cost.
Misidentification of Alphanumeric Symbols (2014)
Agreed, but I think people make too big a deal about iterators. The simple for loops that they’re fit to replace aren’t that hard to read or write, so they aren’t causing real problems, and on the more complex end you’re writing imperative stuff anyway. Iterators certainly aren’t a bad thing, but they’re not the game changer that Go-critics made them out to be in all of the Rust-vs-Go debates.
This was an example of the dubious kind of parapsychology experiment conducted during the period. I'm sure there were true believers, but I think healthy skepticism probably prevented people from pursuing it too seriously, even when positive results were reported.
Models show this same result for most (all?) regions they have been applied to. Here is a survey paper going over the current state of research globally and what mixes different models arrive at for different regions:

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9837910
That’s exactly what Jetbrain’s Datagrip does.
Doing that as well. And let's be clear, unripped DVDs contain ads (if I have to skip through previews and crap before I can watch the content, that's advertising.)

I have an app that plays this ripped content on a schedule very much like a TV channel (no pausing, rewinding, no way to choose what is on when — the schedule dictates). I love it. Even though I am creating the schedule with my own (local) content, there is still the serendipitous nature of walking by the TV and seeing a particular old Twilight Zone on.
Or, alternatively, a handful of gas plants working at this load like peaking power plants work now. So, for 72 hours or so, where the full need isn't met, we have some very expensive alternatives. According to wikipedia, some peaker plants may work as little as a few hours a year.

Or, we have a set of solar thermal energy power plants that can function as peakers down the road.
Especially depending on the season - clouds in the summer also typically correspond with a big drop in AC demand, reducing the amount of electricity required. That's why OPs modeling is so interesting, "real" daily data for an entire year is great for this type of planning.
That's just convention though. There's no reason "[x]" couldn't have been defined to be "+ (x - 1) * sizeof". There would be no runtime cost to this, and the compile time penalty would be tiny even on ancient systems.
there's a gradient between 'nothing' and 'human', and things toward the 'nothing' end can't invoke bodily autonomy, especially against actual humans with real, functional bodies.
This is a slightly better headline than the one they changed it to which makes no sense.
In SoCal I pay, at most, 28¢/kWh, but usually ~20¢/kWh with Time of Use [1]. You configure the car and/or EVSE to only charge at night when electricity is cheapest.

[1] https://www.ladwp.com/ladwp/faces/wcnav_externalId/a-fr-elec...

They should also couple a "nationalization" of PG&E with this too. Municipal run power is typically cheaper than investor owned power.
Amsterdam is a pretty shitty place to bike if you compare it to the rest of the Netherlands.

The point these posts are making is that you need dedicated infrastructure to get people to cycle. Roads need to be walkable as well. So NA's car centric infra is the cause. Not the cyclists.
>Honestly, as much as AMD's processors are often great value for money, I have never had a completely stable glitch-free AMD system.

If they are glitchy how can they be great value?

I've had the same experience over the past decades - I will never be buying AMD again.
Yes, the imperative version looks like the sane choice to me. Rust's iterator documentation does suggest that this is not a language which favours iterator chains everywhere.

However one reason to prefer an iterator chain in some cases is that the chain might imply an optimisation you'd otherwise have to write manually and might not think of.

For example if I have N things, and I map them, perhaps more than once, but I'm definitely getting N of whatever the output of the last map was, the iterator chain might very well see that I don't actually have any way to change N and so when I collect() that into a Vec the Vec it gives me is constructed with capacity N, saving the (amortized but non-zero) cost of growing it during insertions.

Imperatively I can remember to write Vec::with_capacity(N), and that's safe of course but it's an extra step to remember.

The imperative approach does particularly shine on the opposite edge of this, if I know that I'm getting no more than 100 items out of this pipeline, despite putting N in, Rust almost certainly won't see that and won't make Vec::with_capacity(100) for a collect() call whereas my imperative code can just explicitly write Vec::with_capacity(100) or whatever.
I’m pretty content with the iphone 12 pro

but I wonder if I’m becoming like you or others, where there was some other arbitrary technological progress and lack of interest in trends and suddenly 10 years went by and people are like “what is that device why are you using that”
It's also fundamentally limits the growth potential of BTC. In a PoW system, the amount of work done must be proportional to the total value of all BTC (if not, it would make 51% attacks feasible).

So if BTC uses an Argentina's worth of energy now, if the value of BTC grew 10X it would have to use on the order of 10 Argentina's worth of electricity. Obviously, that is not sustainable, and it ensures BTC can never grow in value too much if it sticks with PoW.
Client diversity has improved in recent months, particularly consensus clients:

https://clientdiversity.org/
The website is so fast I did not notice it redrawed when I clicked Part I. I'm impressed.
There is some legitimate concern here. On the other hand, PoS looks to be more accessible to hobby miners/stakers because they don't have to convert their coin into ASICs or GPUs.
No, birthdays are 1 indexed. Your Nth birthday is the day you turn N years old. When you're 1 year old, you've been alive for 1 year, not 2 years.
This is completely in line with reasonable priors:

https://www.wartsila.com/energy/towards-100-renewable-energy...

It's more of a science/engineering communication effort, because there's a lot of unreasonable priors out there.

edit: also the 6.6GW of 'other' the current model uses, is the current actual gas plant size, not an amount that they predict as optimal or desirable. Similar with the Hydro, they used the current capacity, even though some are being built right now.
Markdown would better serve 95% of the email I see.
> Transmission losses would eat any benefit, unfortunately.

Big “citation needed” on that assertion.

HVDC is a widely proposed option and it’s an oversimplification to dismiss it with a single sentence.

For example the old DeserTec made a feasibility analysis for HVDC interconnects across EU and into Africa; the problem with that one seemed to be more about geopolitical issues and upfront investment costs, rather than long-term feasibility of transmission losses.

A newer analysis at the top of Google does not say “this doesn’t work because of transmission losses”. https://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/electricity/hvdctransmi....
Honestly the closure + `transpose` is really ugly as sin. I had to do a double take and reason through the steps which you took to get that particular snippet (while not reading the imperative one).
I initially misinterpreted the phrase "Using Mushrooms" in the title and my next thought was "Oh, this must be how tie-dye was invented."
Would you mind reviewing the site guidelines at https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html? You broke quite a few of them here—especially this one:

"Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith."
If you think of the index as an offset you would start with 0.

BTW on which level is the 1st floor?
I see a lot of cynicism around renewable energy and electric cars and I frankly don't get it. The typical cynical approach is to point out one potential problem, and dismiss the entire solution as if it was worthless, which is obviously false.

As others have pointed out, there are now HVDC lines that can go over thousands of kilometers (transcontinental scale!) with reasonable losses. There's no reason to believe that we've hit the peak of HVDC technology either. The need for this technology to exist will drive further innovation.

Even if the OP's estimate is off. Even if we "only" get to 90% renewables by 2045, that's still pretty damn great compared to what we have now, isn't it? Is your cynical opinion that we should just keep going with the status quo because we can't get 100% ?

Even if we need 15% more wind and 15% more storage to than the OP's estimate reach 99%, that's not impossible either. It will create a lot of jobs. Why not just roll up our sleeves and do the best that we can? Thankfully, the world is not only made up of cynics, and a lot of people already are.

We aren't done innovating on the renewable front either. There's LOTS of research into cheaper, safer, more scaleable grid-scale batteries. The current state of the art is cobalt-free and nickel-free lithium iron phosphate, but people sodium-ion batteries look like they're going to be viable soon.

I also feel pretty confident that we'll eventually manage relatively efficient ways to store energy over the long term. If we could turn electricity into methane or ethanol with even 25% efficiency, that would allow us to store energy from the summer to use in the winter, or to power transatlantic airplanes with renewables. That seems pretty exciting to me.
Edsger Dijkstra wrote an interesting article titled 'why numbering should start at 0'.
Perhaps not answering the question directly but an interesting read nonetheless.

https://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/transcriptions/EWD08xx/E...
Start typing “SEL”, ide suggests “SELECT _ FROM”, you press enter and the above text is entered, while the cursor is placed after from. You write that part of the query and after pressing enter it will jump back to the select part.

This is done already by Jetbrain’s datagrip for example.
I ride bikes a lot. The only way to not have your bike stolen is to bring it in the shops with you, and store it in areas the public cannot see or access it (basically, in your house). It will get stolen if locked up outside, even if there are many people around. It will get stolen from your private parking garage with security guards, and it will get stolen from your second floor balcony.
Yeah age is confusing even for non-computer-folks :)

If you have 4 classes in school today, you would never talk about the 1st class as number 0, the last one is the 4th, not the 3rd.
The moment you are born you are 0 years old (or perhaps 0.75 years old, but we don't usually recognize that). We count from zero in this case, at least implicitly.

In some cultures you are considered 1 the moment you are born, so the zero indexing isn't universal here, but typical in North America as noted earlier.
How much do you pay for those tools/services?
> Now this feels like arguing semantics. Because multiple people are wrong, this makes them right? Sorry, no.

I did not say they were right. Effectively I said a lot of people use the term "open source" differently than you do, and that I didn't think the wording you chose to argue your case was going to be effective.

I understand the frustration.

> This is a solved problem, it was solved 15 years ago

I guess that depends on what problem you are referring to. In my experience, the use of the term "open source" to refer strictly to "source available" software is about as common as it ever has been.

> I’m going to complain about this, net positive effect be damned.

Well that's your choice, but in my opinion by doing so in the way you have in this thread, you are working against the goal of persuading people to use the term in the way you want it to be used.
There was always OTA (over the air). To hell with ESPN.
If you were wondering:

"The Merge is a change of consensus mechanism, not an expansion of network capacity, and will not result in lower gas fees. "

https://ethereum.org/en/upgrades/merge/
The Ontario grid has been there for years. 92% zero-carbon. [1]

[1] https://www.cer-rec.gc.ca/en/data-analysis/energy-markets/pr...
The problem is that the people most affected by this sort of software (the gamers) are not the customers of the company that makes it; the game publishers are. So Denuvo just needs to pitch the idea that their product will increase sales, which is certainly something publishers already want to hear.
My prediction is that there'll be a growing business of vulchers putting in pay-per-use chargers in large apartment buildings that the landlord gets a kickback on, much like overpriced washer/dryers.
And after all that, you show up to work with bicycle face, coworkers muttering “wheelman” to themselves as you walk by.
I presume anybody who is already using a dedicated GPU would not be happy with the performance of Intel's integrated GPUs.
Trump White House exerted pressure on FDA Covid-19 emergency use authorizations
There's a tradeoff. We need to acknowledge the tradeoff, and be prepared for the folks who just want to watch the world burn, and have the money to do so.
>This time, along with the manuals, Apple is presenting DIY repairers with a excruciating gauntlet of hurdles: read 162 pages of documentation without getting intimidated

I read the PDF.

https://manuals.info.apple.com/MANUALS/2000/MA2083/en_US/mac...

It seems highly likely to me that anyone claiming this document is intimidating either has not read it or is lying for some reason.

In many respects, the Apple document is vastly superior to the iFixit guides.

An example of that is that the Apple guide has more descriptive language to ensure that the user feels the correct sensations when performing a step.

Here's the iFixit guide for replacing the antenna module: https://www.ifixit.com/Guide/MacBook+Air+13-Inch+Late+2020+A...

iFixit: Pivot the spudger against the hinge to pry up the end of the antenna bar.

Apple: Gently slide the flat end of the black stick below one of the four screw holes (1) to loosen the antenna module from the tape on the top case. Then rotate the black stick until you feel a click (2).

Apple's instructions also include steps to perform if an action isn't "easy":

iFixit: The antenna bar is secured with some adhesive and may require some force to dislodge.

Apple: If the antenna module doesn’t release from the tape, slowly and gently slide the black stick under the module to loosen it.
If you read the article you'd see that Apple will not sell you a battery. They will ONLY sell you a "Top case with battery and keyboard" which requires removing every single part of the laptop in order to replace. This is more invasive, more expensive, and less approachable from a repair standpoint if you go with their process.
> You can't. At least in infosec the managers at the place you are applying to will call up your current manager and as many of your coworkers as they can about you. The last place I interviewed at, even before the interview random coworkers were asking me about it.

That seems extremely unprofessional. I wouldn't work at such a place. It seems like a tactic to force you to move.
This survey paper shows the same holds true pretty much everywhere, with lots of different labs using different models arriving at the same finding:

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9837910