skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think things like this are great because they will finally start to create pressure to commodify >1gbps networking in the home. The industry has some work to do here.

I've been on Sonic 10G for almost a year now and LOVE it, but it's definitely been a sore spot to get things set up to expect those kinds of speeds - prosumer 10G switches are vastly more expensive per-port, wired consumer devices don't typically support 10GbaseT/SFP+, 2.5G/5G switches aren't broadly available and commodified (e.g. UniFi has limited offerings here) and WiFi6E is still mid-rollout (almost no client devices currently in market yet) meaning that clients can't reasonably expect >1gbps of goodput, even with a good link from a modern device to a modern AP. Then there's flakiness: when things get hot in my garage, my 10G switch just stops working. My Thunderbolt-to-10GbaseT adapter for my MacBook runs very hot. Lots of sharp edges here.

The more consumers are buying 10G equipment for their 10G home links, the faster prices will come down and reliability will come up - not just for 10G but also for 2.5G/5G equipment. Hats off to EPB for paving the way for 25G and keeping vendors diligent in mapping out the next generation of their equipment.
> Whether someone "feels stiffed" or not is irrelevant. Thinking that other people shouldn't get help just because you didn't is petty.

I'm not against other people getting things, but to me, that evokes images of the government helping people struggling with food, or child care, or housing.

Giving a middle class college grad who makes $100,000/yr $10,000 isn't "helping" the people who need it most. People who live in the marginalized, working class communities that progressives want to represent don't have college degrees. The whole thing seems tone deaf without even getting into why it's bad for the economy, perpetuates problems with the education system, etc.
If they would consider helping with the things I mention here we'd do our best to support them!

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32585950
It's a great thing for the environment, and a bad thing for the economy.
IMO that "culty feeling" you're getting is the end result of a lot of very experienced engineers encountering Rust, going "holy shit", and trying to preach about it from the rooftops because it feels so much better than the things that have come before it.

I find this particularly compelling because Rust generally does not market itself towards novice developers. At least until very recently, I've seen Rust communities actively discourage novices from trying to learn Rust. Not that it's inherently a bad language to learn as one's first, but there just haven't been great resources for people to learn it if they don't already have some previous software experience. The net effect of this is that the enthusiasm you're seeing is coming from a much higher proportion than usual of people who've been in the industry awhile, and not from as many fresh college or bootcamp grads.
A language with 10 years history is simpler than one with 40 year of legacy....

While Rust is definitely an improvement over C++, it remains to be seen how those 40 years of legacy will look like.
An ordered collection of things starts no things from the beginning.

A journey starts 0 metres from the origin.

If you count the number of _ you are along your journey and start with 1, then at the second metre you are at the 101st centimetre.

When someone says how many dragons have you slain? Just as you leave and haven't heard of any dragons yet, you don't say "I'm slaying my first dragon now"

Every construction of the natural numbers I have seen starts with 0.

The first hour of the day has passed when the clock strikes one. The hour preceding that is the same day. English calls it 12 because it was invented before we had a firm grasp of zero and english is inconsistent. 24 hour clocks call it 00.

1 based indexing can be correct, but 1 based ordered discrete sets map incredibly poorly to any ordered set with a different number of elements (such as the reals). Additionally dealing with ranges is less easy to make consistent.

0 based indexing is always correct.
Haha, this thing is messed up. Your "first birthday" is technically second, because the first was at your, well, day of birth. But we people love to complicate things and count 1st birthday as a number of annual celebration events after the first mm-dd of birth. Off by one as it is.
Use pdf2dejvu to convert all your PDF's to DjVU.
Convert all your images to farbleld, too.

Problem solved.
If it's helpful, the government* considers it both of your money. If one of you racks up debts that money will go to pay for it. If you divorce, you'll split it. You two are a package deal, so all this pettiness isn't helping anything.

Use some of the money to go to therapy, both individual and couples. If you go soon enough you might save your marriage. Either way, it's probably the best investment in yourselves that's available.

*Depends where you are but certainly true in California
Treasury.gov also offers a free public API
Corporate spammers love rich formatting and dynamic elements. Nobody else wants that crap.
But it isn't an ad. You are not required or incentivized to buy anything.
The only stablecoin people should use through Tornado Cash is DAI.
Well, e-mail has different uses, I do use mutt and I send plain text email, but I understand sending newsletter with "nice" format in HTML. I am happy that many includes a "view link" I can just open in my browser if I want to read it.

I use lynx for html formatting, which works, except with long confirmation link, for this I use urlscan[1] which let me browse and open links.

I don't think email must be loved or hated, it's not black and white, it is an old protocol with lots of problems, but it's also the only working federated protocol (and I do operate my own email server with 0 issues, google/ms never rejected me) which is an important freedom.

I agree that many client have bad UX, but many have nice UX, and you are free to use what you want, even if you have a gmail account.

[1]: https://github.com/firecat53/urlscan
Why would a story about building high speed rail be relevant to installing fiber adjacent to existing utilities?
Currently on the front page is:

>Smarking (YC W15) Is Hiring a Product Lead to digitize the parking industry (lever.co)

You could disclose it as such

>AD: Smarking (YC W15) Is Hiring a Product Lead to digitize the parking industry (lever.co)
It's gotta be the wifi, you're probably dropping packets here and there.
I came to the same conclusion really, it's a neat service but even using something like Parsec locally induces enough latency that I just can't use it.

I still run windows in a VFIO setup but Linux is really good for gaming these days. Was even playing Cyberpunk on the release day!
Nope. That's the fast lane to getting ground down by content owners; they'll determine how much profit you're allowed to make. See also: Pandora, Spotify.
Thanks!! We'll do our best to keep improving things for everyone. Hopefully security by compartmentalization folks benefit from our work as well. I'll be going to QubesOS Summit so hopefully there will be more good conversations there. :)
People sometimes absentmindedly misspeak. Either that happened and you can politely s/Firefox/browser/ so that the comment reads as a reasonable, even insightful contribution to the discussion, or the comment is utter nonsense and you can feel smug that you’re not as stupid as they must be. Granting the former interpretation is the more charitable option.

You should also understand that “Surely…” doesn’t mean the same thing as “I am sure”. “Surely…” is a plea for sanity.
When my fiance and I moved in together we set up a joint bank account. All of our money goes to the joint and we give ourselves an "allowance" each month. We get the same allowance, which is plenty, and discuss large purchases from the shared pool. The main reason for the allowance is because we budget the pooled money weekly meaning that purchases aren't private. We don't need to be entirely in each others business so the allowance lets us make purchases without informing the other.

The way we think about this is that _any_ increase in either of our paychecks is a benefit for both of us. I'd love if my fiance made 10x what I did because that all comes back to benefit me too. I'm pretty easy to please though. My fiance is really into some expensive beauty products for example and we buy those out of the shared pool but I don't really care for much except having a good PC. Even if I suddenly got serious $$$ I think I'd pretty much continue doing the same stuff. I wouldn't even buy a new car.
this news was enough to pump Tornado Cash 50% and dumped 40% afterwards
In general, we each contribute an equal fraction of our income to a joint account. That money is "team money", from which money then flows to "team savings" and investment accounts.

If we make an expenditure out of the team accounts, it gets authorized by both of us, either explicitly (for big stuff) or through an enduring understanding (like groceries).

Non-team money lives in individual accounts, for the individual to do whatever they'd like. If one partner wants to go big on something, it is their prerogative. If one partner wants to go big on something that ultimately becomes a team item or improvement to a team asset, they can do that, too.

Works for us. We check in about it informally a couple of times a year, and definitely with an annual review.

As the lower-earner, I've definitely felt as though I'm not necessarily pulling my weight, but my partner seems happy with the arrangement. There are always asymmetries in relationships; a key may be to keep them in some sort of dynamic balance, whereby in aggregate, something good happens for everyone concerned.
I've read so many articles like this that point to similar things, the zoning issues, the over-regulation, the fact we need to build more housing as the fundamental fix. Yet all I continue to see from government is the same old heel-dragging intransigence.

So what I'm left wondering isn't how to fix this, or what the government's response will be, but rather what is going to happen to finally force a change in direction? Mass homelessness? Depopulation of major cities? I don't think major economic downturns have the potential to do it. They'll slap a bunch of quick fix band-aids over those issues and declare the problem solved. There has to be something that is too big to declare fixed by printing more money or bailing out a few companies.
I always hear this brought up but how essential to emailing is calendaring? Is exchange support built in to mutt or pine?
I think that they will need to fork the web browsers and maintain the forks instead of the originals, in order to make improvements. This is one of them but is not only one. To actually make the web browsers good, will require further changes (sometimes involving adding stuff back in that was removed in older versions, or removing some of the newly added stuff while keeping some of it).

However, I would prefer the default to be "no search", and to only search if the user explicitly specifies which search engine to use. (This does not necessarily mean that Debian has to do this; it only means that it is what would be my own preference. Some other people will agree with me, although some people will disagree.)

Regardless of the default settings though (sometimes different default settings might be suitable due to the distribution; in this case it doesn't matter, but for some settings of some programs, it will matter), the end user should have the opportunity to change all of the settings.
If you're talking about lockdown mode, that's a totally different feature from shipping browser updates independent of the OS.

I think Apple fell down the design flaw that Microsoft went down of bundling the browser so tightly into the OS.
It's a "job ad". Someone paid money to have it put in front of your face.
it's taking away potential revenue from Google.

Wow. Yes, that's how competition works. Are people at the tech monopolists really that entitled that they consider the entire world's purse strings theirs to control?
Right - the legal term of art is strict liability. Perkins Coie has a little explainer:

https://www.perkinscoie.com/en/news-insights/ofac-releases-n...
Not much. But there is a very large difference between "will" and "might".
I've found it to be a pretty good product, at least for my use case. I only have an hour or two/wk to play games these days, so it doesn't make a ton of sense to spend the time and $ to buy and install a new video card. So I got whatever the bottom paid tier is for GeForce Now and, while there are occasional lag-spikes and jitters, they're generally rare enough to only rise to the level of minor annoyance.

If I wanted to spend a lot of time playing games, especially multi-player ones, I don't think it would be a good substitute for using my own machine, but for being able to occasionally dip a toe into a game when I get the itch, its a pretty good deal.
I see a lot of teslas with crazy flat bright paintjobs, i assume aftermarket?
Because those are the default browser settings. As explained, there is another more appropriate way to change default settings for distributions. The way Debian did it is more for enterprise management.
I have a non-AI code generator if that would be of interest to your info gathering. It's definitely meant for developer efficiency over the entire software lifecycle. Happy to tell you all about it if you are doing interviews, calls, or the similar.

https://github.com/hofstadter-io/hof | https://docs.hofstadter.io
More anacedata: GeForce now over Ethernet is significantly better than Wi-Fi 6 in my apartment building.
> My body, my choice. Do you agree?

Broadly speaking, yes. The narrow point here is on how to deal with choices that hurt others.

On the prescriptive side, we could foreclose that choice. That's mandatory vaccination. On the reactive side, we can assign liability. That's the point of my analogy.
Those aren't proper audits. And again, bringing up the fact that it's open source is a meaningless piece of information since there is no way to verify it's the same software code on production. It only serves to trick the average user who doesn't understand how web servers work into trusting your service more.

The best thing you could do, if you actually care about privacy and not just $$$, is to open-source the entire search index db and accompanying webserver software, making it easy for users to setup their own local instance of DDG which is actually auditable. Additionally, posting a notice on-site which notifies your users that their searches may be recorded and tracked in spite of what the privacy policy says(due to the USA jurisdiction of the company making it susceptible to National Security Letters and secret gag orders) would be the right thing to do.
I find that effective dosage is the most surprising aspect of this study

>Interventions Study medications were psilocybin, 25 mg/70 kg, vs diphenhydramine, 50 mg (first session), and psilocybin, 25-40 mg/70 kg, vs diphenhydramine, 50-100 mg (second session). Psychotherapy included motivational enhancement therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy.

25mg is an extremely small dose! Much smaller than most micro-dose regiments at 0.5g
What's worked well for us is to adopt the framing that both of our time is equally morally valuable, if not equally financially valuable. One hour of my life spend doing work for pay is worth one our of her life spent doing work for pay.

We've operationalized this as:
1. Determine how much we want/need to spend on joint things (groceries, mortgage, vacation fund, etc)., call this B for budget.
2. Look at how much we're each making, M for me and H for her.
3. Find the fraction of our money X (which is roughly speaking equivalent to fraction of hours worked in our case) Such that XM + XH = B
4. We each contribute our respective portion to a joint account, and pay for all joint things out of the joint account.
5. We each keep the rest of our money in our own accounts, to do with whatever we like.

You might need to add a couple of terms to account for different work schedules.

Knowing that we're both contributing equal _effort_ to everything makes the inequalities (I contribute more to shared stuff, but also have a bigger personal discretionary budget) not seem like such an issue.
Damn, this is some peak hackernews vibes. Bringing up eating poison as a way to deflect from thinking too hard about the contradiction of America's cultural meme of intense individual freedom against extremely restrictive governments policies against psychedelic consumption
I wouldn’t say it is because it is a miracle, but because it still focuses on being an e-mail client. In Ubuntu kmail requires a database server and groupware.
My wife and I each have our own personal bank accounts and one shared joint account. All shared expenses (mortgage, utilities, internet, Netflix, groceries etc.) come from the joint account. We each manage our own retirement and personal expenses. We both send a portion of our paychecks to the joint account every month that covers the shared expenses. We each can do whatever we want with the money in our personal accounts.

Since I am making significantly more than my wife these days I always pay for meals out, movies, etc. It's worked for us for about 12 years now.
Things would get awkward for the more exploitative or otherwise "bad" companies. Having the top comment be "Your entire business model is a dystopian nightmare" would probably hurt some feelings.
“real estate is expensive and NIMBYs don’t want it”… the end.

(Also the story of why Hyperloop is pointless. technology isn’t the problem that needs solving! Fast rapid transit tech has existed since the 1980’s and it’s not the cost issue.)
> They hate on accents because of previous bad experiences talking to agents with accents

I think nowadays we have established it doesn't matter why e.g. IQ tests are racist if they impact different races differently.
>It's a pattern, but definitely not dark or undisclosed.

Isn't it a dark pattern something that you're not upfront about? Because...

>The system and rationale are explained in the HN FAQ and repeatedly reiterated by the mods.

... I have to go to the FAQ (and how do you easily get to the FAQ when you're on https://news.ycombinator.com, anyway? it's not exactly easy to find, I had to Google it) to learn about it, or a mod has to show up in a thread like this to mention it. There's nothing at face value when the post is on the front page that alludes to what it is, and I'd hardly say that removing the ability to comment on that post does much to clarify what it is.

A pattern can be dark even if unintentionally.
I went down this rabbit hole 2 months ago and stumbled upon the Curry-Howard correspondence [1].

I don't understand why I find this stuff fascinating.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curry%E2%80%93Howard_correspon...
The FAQ literally calls it a “job ad”. Ads don’t necessarily need to drive sales for them to be ads.
When we started ten years ago we agreed all future money would be shared, and require discussion before spending on something big (but with an assumption of fair dealing).

We originally had a weekly allowance - booze money - when we weren’t making much for meals out/seeing friends but in the last couple years just use the joint credit card for that stuff since relative to our other expenditures it’s nothing.

Now we reinvest all my RSUs in trackers, and have a monthly spending goal that’s 20% less than our combined salaries that lets us save money for vacations and house stuff without hitting investments. Bonuses and stuff like we treat as “fuck it” money.

My hobbies are way more expensive than hers, so we do have discussions about stuff quite often, but it’s never been a problem - usually I just have to wait until a big enough bonus comes along if it’s something dumb like my project car.

Maybe it helps that when we started I was making 4x less than her and am now making 4x more.
> America's Anti-Vax movement is religiously sure of itself. They aren't on the fence. They're not weighing the pros and cons.

This is the activist wing of the movement. Many more Americans are genuinely, in many cases reasonably, hesitant.
10/40Gb hasn't been the standard in data centers in a number of years. My house is entirely 10Gb (save for wireless), in part because older enterprise gear at those speeds is so cheap.

25/50 and 100/400 have supplanted 10/40 in the data center, and 800Gb is here now.
In case of divorce that “rainy fund” will be split 50:50 so it is not really her money - at least not from the point of view of law.

I guess this is tricky situation and marriage counseling might help here. They say that finances are the main reason for divorce but it is the least important one.
This is a real tough one.

I have lived this and my best advice is that you should be equal partners. From personal experience, each partner contributes different strengths and abilities. Money is easy to divide and represents life energy but there is more to a partnership.

Equal partners does not mean exactly the same effort. Do you split the household chores exactly 50%? Probably not. I look at this in the same light.

Also, circumstances change. Right now your wife is making more money. If she suddenly got laid off, would you support her with "your" money? (Yes.) If one of you got an inheritance, would that be carved off and only spendable by the inheritor? (No.) If you got a sizable gift from your parents, would it be yours singular or yours plural (plural). If she had a kiddo and wanted to stay home, would you support her with "your" money? (Yes.)

As far as nuts and bolts, talk about goals, talk about frustrations, talk about the challenges. There are financial counselors out there: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/13/business/financial-therap... they might be helpful. Or a straight up marriage counselor.

Compromise. Maybe there are things that your wife wants to buy that she feels like she should be able to. That should be a compromise and discussion because she wants to be in partnership with you.

Things to avoid:

* hidden bank accounts
* ignoring this issue
Yeah, a company that routinely posts gives a “referral” link but it just leads to their normal career page and there’s nothing I can tell that actually makes your application a referral. It’s disappointing because this is a company I’ve been trying to interview at for nearly 4 years now.
They are not 'deliberately made to look like every other submission', they simply look like every other submission because that's what HN submissions look like. If they were made to stand out you'd likely be complaining that they get even more preferential treatment because they stand out.

If you don't like them just ignore them.

There is nothing misleading about them and they don't trick users because the vast bulk of the visitors to HN knows what these are and if you didn't it's explained in the docs.

They don't trick you into buying anything and they don't serve to market the product of the start-up that is posting the position. The only difference is that they don't have to wait until the 1st of the month and that they get to post an item all by themselves, which seems like a pretty small price to pay compared to say having a site full of advertising or some massive commercial drive.

HN is rather more than less restricted whenever the companies that YC invests in come up, this is the one exception.