skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> when I get home and I have a feeling that next drive might be long and need charge, I plug it in

Sure, let me hang down the cable with electricity from the 3rd floor window of the apartment building I live in, that will work great. (Can I even charge the car from regular socket? I would hope yes, albeit slowly I assume.)

> You don't have experience so you think how it would be different .. and different is .. bad?

For me the car is a handy tool, so don't care much about "feel of the motor" or whatever. But the tool should be practical. So in this case, when I compare 5m to fill the tank and pay to 25m (Level 3, here [0]) to charge the EV, the gas variant comes out as superior. And the car itself is cheaper. And has bigger range (well, not that that one matters too much to me. Anything over 400km would be enough for me).

So I just don't see why I should prefer EV (disclaimer: I'm not sold on the whole "it's greener" thing, for multitude of reasons).

0: https://mechanicbase.com/electric/how-long-does-it-take-to-f...

> petrol car fill up was about 130EUR, the electric to do the same distance between 2 and 40 EUR depending price of electricity and whether I do fast charge.

At current gas prices, full tank is ~43 EUR for me (using conversion rate from google). At my income (low by US standard, reasonable by the local ones), that is low enough I mostly don't care about it since it's once every month or two.

Out of curiosity, might I ask what car did you drive before? 130 EUR for full tank sounds... like a lot. So I'm wondering if it was due to car being huge or due to gas price.
I like that you had to specify 'legally' because riders in America basically never follow traffic laws.
It's certainly higher than it used to be, but I doubt many users would tolerate anything that high. I just did a quick scroll through my feed (first in a while) and it was pretty much what I expected to see. From comments I'm reading in this thread I can only assume FB have been doing some sort of A/B testing. Luckily for me I seem to be in the control group. Maybe because I only check my feed once a week or so...
Run Kubernetes. Install the open-source Kubernetes ingress controller with your favourite load balancer. I'd wager that'd solve majority of your use cases.
I'm interested in whether the available statistics from law enforcement underestimate how frequently it happens - and how one could possibly find out.
As I just said, I've been a party to and witnessed over a dozen entirely fake sexual harassment claims (those are just the ones where I was there when said harassment was said to have occurred when it didn't). I've actually seen more fake claims than real ones in my life (sorry). So I wouldn't point the finger at online narratives either.
Interesting to see the part about Rust getting the most attention. We're giving a talk about it in NYC next week[1] and will definitely follow up with an in-depth writeup.

[1] https://www.meetup.com/rust-nyc/events/287821884/
If you are just building random passion projects, then yes. If you actually spend the time to find a real problem people have and build a solution for that, I'm not sure if I'd call that luck.
I get a few of these every day lately with yahoo mail. I was getting a bunch of confirm delivery receipt phishing emails for costco, walmart, fedex as well as tractors and bitcoin recently as well. They all seemed to have the same wacky text style used in the subject line.
They went out of favor because vehicle body design trends (largely driven by safety requirements) make them have a lot less practical space inside for a given external size.

The idiots who cooked up the CAFE footprint rule that resulted in all the OEMs cramming the axles to the far ends of the vehicle (killing a lot of trunk space in the process) are probably responsible for the biggest share but it's very much a death by a thousand cuts situation.
One counterpoint: biking on sidewalks is illegal in many jurisdictions for a pretty good reason.

If you're a pedestrian walking alongside a busy street, it's almost impossible to hear a cyclist coming up behind you, so unless the cyclist tells you that they're about to pass you, it's easy to unintentionally move into the cyclist's path and risk getting hit.

I've almost gotten hit several times by bikers on the sidewalk, and while such a collision would be much less injurious than a car crash, I can't say I'm opposed to such laws.
3D print and build a 164mm f/2.5 lens for less than $15
Cybersecurity Profile: Peiter Zatko, Codename: Mudge
I like open source / free software that has the financial imperatives in plain view: that enables me to make informed decisions.

The best case when heavy lifting is taking place with a murky payroll is that there’s an Enterprise version you’ll eventually need. The worst case is, uh worse.
According to the CDC, performing CPR has a 10 to 20% chance of saving someone who would otherwise die (https://www.cdc.gov/heartdisease/cpr.htm)

In contrast, there are no documented cases of someone experiencing actual negative consequences from performing CPR. No lost jobs, no nights in jail, nothing. The closest thing I could find was a case in Japan where a man was questioned by police and let go as soon as he explained that he was using and AED (https://japantoday.com/category/national/man-revives-woman-w...). It was in the unusual case where he performed AED outside, where many passers by were driving and didn't have time to see what was actually happening. Even then, nothing bad happened to him and he saved someones life.
Try adding your favorite team or holiday at the beginning of the prompt.
Dupe.

This story has been submitted and discussed many times already recently on HN.

Also: "Please submit the original source. If a post reports on something found on another site, submit the latter." https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
I mean, in theory there's the backstop of getting water delivered by truck and everyone having a septic tank. Service would have to be extremely bad for that to be the better option, though. Just like how trains compete with buses, cars and planes.
There's two types of complexity: necessary and unnecessary. You may need to reread the comment above.
> driving these tanks

They are not tanks. They are suburban armoured personnel carriers.
I, for one, would lose contact to a lot of my friends if I deleted facebook (and already have lost contact with some of them because they selfishly deleted their fb)
Those are some huge ternary ifs

I really wish Typescript had a great pattern matching system. It would be very nice indeed for structural typing, everything would be easier to read, probably some ways to add more power/expressivity, etc.

eg

type GetOptions<T> =
// Part 1: responsible for applying explicit type parameter to function arguments, if object { queryFnData: TQueryFnData, error: TError, data: TData }
T extends {
queryFnData: infer TQueryFnData
error?: infer TError
data: infer TData
}
? UseQueryOptionsForUseQueries<TQueryFnData, TError, TData>
: T extends { queryFnData: infer TQueryFnData; error?: infer TError }
? UseQueryOptionsForUseQueries<TQueryFnData, TError>
: T extends { data: infer TData; error?: infer TError }
? UseQueryOptionsForUseQueries<unknown, TError, TData>
: // Part 2: responsible for applying explicit type parameter to function arguments, if tuple [TQueryFnData, TError, TData]
T extends [infer TQueryFnData, infer TError, infer TData]
// ...

becomes

type GetOptions<T> =
// Part 1: responsible for applying explicit type parameter to function arguments, if object { queryFnData: TQueryFnData, error: TError, data: TData }
T extends match {
{ queryFnData: infer TQueryFnData, error?: infer TError, data: infer TData } => UseQueryOptionsForUseQueries<TQueryFnData, TError, TData>
{ queryFnData: infer TQueryFnData; error?: infer TError } => UseQueryOptionsForUseQueries<TQueryFnData, TError>,
{ data: infer TData; error?: infer TError } => UseQueryOptionsForUseQueries<unknown, TError, TData>,
[infer TQueryFnData, infer TError, infer TData] => UseQueryOptionsForUseQueries<TQueryFnData, TError, TData>
[infer TQueryFnData, infer TError] => UseQueryOptionsForUseQueries<TQueryFnData, TError>
// ...
}

or even, to make the top level way easy to understand in this case:

type GetOptions<T> =
T extends match {
Part1 => Part1Match
Part2 => Part2Match
Part3 => Part3Match
}

where Part1Match etc are themselves pattern matches, so you can compose them like functions.
Rust is a lot simpler than C++ or Scala. It has some upfront complexity wrt. C or Zig, but that pays off when dealing with larger programs, where avoiding subtle bugs becomes much harder.
This is really interesting. Thanks for your suggestion.
>If a facebook engineer is reading this, you need to offer a "updates from my friends" timeline, separate from the rest.

FB engineer reporting. We have no control over this.

Honestly, at this point most of us just hang on to siphon off as much money as possible from the company before it all comes crumbling down.

My advice for FB users would be to stop using it. I'm not using it either.
> though I worry about the use of an unproven language

Maybe this will be the company that proves it :)
tldr of the tldr for those who don't want to click out:

- Devs do hate advertising. The level is extreme, unreasonable even.
- Devs love swag. Unreasonably so.
- Devs appreciate good tutorials and blogs.
- Devs only really trust other devs.
- Say what you don’t do to build trust.
- Devs use a lot of ad blocks.
- Podcast ads work.
- Say what you do, let me try, wait for me to reach out.
- Devs think marketing == promotion and ads.
Long time privacy-aware lurker here. Never thought this would be my first post but I just wanted to warn folks on this board who value their privacy to be aware of Brave Talk because it will activate your camera without consent.
No but the state can be much more effective at providing housing then individuals.
> Ministries (Americans: Departments, not religious ministries) are usually only reachable either on Facebook or by physically traveling hours to their office.

Can you give one example? A link to their website or FB page would suffice.
Can someone easily renounce their drivers license in advance?
I once drove a Tesla on a road that was asphalt covered over what appeared to earlier be a concrete road. The concrete was visible through cracks in the top asphalt surface in straight lines. To a camera, they sort of looked like lane lines, but they were right down the middle of the lanes!

I was manually driving, but the car was constantly freaking out because it thought I was running off the road. :lol Yes, it can be a hard problem.

OTOH, my car is running regular AP and will not engage when no lane lines are available. Nevertheless, I've managed to trick it into engaging in a few cases by engaging while the lines are there and keeping it on when they disappear. It does this close to flawlessly in my neighborhood, which is actually pretty surprising.
> No apps except a modern browser (Firefox 80+, iOS/iPadOS 13+) are required on your tablet.

Huh, so that means it should work on anything with a touch screen and a modern browser, no? For example, a Steam Deck would work too?
In the Netherlands, that is not the case. The worst they can do is give you a fine.
My 2 pieces of advice:

>Don't expect it to pay rent for the first 7 years, after 7 years, expect to pay 1-2 months of rent.

>Use your fame to push a similar product to pay for the other 10 months of rent

I have learned that the first years are slow to gain popularity, but once you have it, you know what works and what doesnt work. Pivot to things that people really care about on a different project, maintaining the original product for popularity/advertising. 99% of what I give away is free, then 1% at a cost.
People who have a charger at home (even a slow one) seem to usually have the opposite experience: they plug the car in when they arrive home, without having to worry about trips to the gas station. The charging problem is mostly about street-side parking where that doesn't work.
I jumped off your prompt and went for "house floor plan" and the results were surprisingly functional at first glance. The words were garbled pixels of course, but the arrangement of lines and layouts was clean, orderly, and mostly functional.
Facebook might be valuable enough for me to pay for, but it is marginal. For every friend who decides to get off facebook the value of facebook also goes down. I wouldn't pay more than a buck/month for facebook, and to get that they need to focus on the things that provide me value (that is they need to show me more about the life of my friends and cut all the memes and political garbage that my friends share). However I never would have joined facebook if there was a price and for years after I wouldn't have been willing to pay, it is only now that I realize the ability to share pictures of my kids with my parents and other friends is a valuable service.
> They could be mistaken for real photograph or real work of (digital) art by a human. Especially by an algorithm.

Perhaps by a naive algorithm. I'm fairly sure it's fairly easy to train a neural network to recognize current generation AI generated images. And probably for quite a while longer.

Btw, if you want to create realistic images, it's fairly easy to create guaranteed pristine data: just take a video camera and create some footage.

Perhaps there will even be a market for such pristine data.

Now, if you want to create art and train on human artists' output, that might perhaps get harder in the future.
>If we're creating images using AI tools, and then sharing the best results, doesn't that become valid training data?

Maybe in cases where those results are at least as good as the real thing. But in general, something being the best of some set of options doesn't imply that it's good, let alone perfect.

And besides, people will also share comically bad results.
?

My comment already agreed with it, and it plays right in to the entire point of you having to still pay attention and drive the car yourself. Hence why I said it is 'Fools Self Driving'

Is this you as well? [0]

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32559771
The bomb peak also allowed for some new highly precise dating techniques for recent stuff, like using tritium to determine aquifer ages.
It also annoys me when somebody is moving too slow in the aisle at the grocery store, but I've literally never once seen someone flip out and yell at or physically push past someone for moving too slow in that context.

We've had 100 years to examine the effects of driving on people's brains and it's...deranging, clearly.
This is a wonderful explanation - thank you!
Weekly summaries of space science papers
Parts of that mosaic are awfully soft, did they not pre-select images based on sharpness?
I got nailed head-on in an 80's Chevy truck vs Mountain Bike accident. I was deprived of life function for around 25 minutes. Were it not for the mom-daughter nurse team that saw the entire accident happen as they were coming home from their shift, I'd not be here today.

Impacts with large and heavy vehicles suck. I can not recommend. Stick with bumper cars.
Highlights of the Tank Biathlon
Most men accused of bad behaviour never see a courtroom.
I was specifically trained to remove bra, because it restrains chest and breaks ventilation (the air will go to the stomach instead and inflated stomach will block further air from entering the lungs). I can imagine this might be seen as inappropriate for a bystander who doesn't understand how this works, but there's something wrong with the system if that might cause serious complaints against rescuer.
Book recommendation:

The Man from the Future: The Visionary Life of John von Neumann by Ananyo Battacharya[0].

It’s a really good biography of John von Neumann. The book follows both his life and the impact of his work carried on by people who came after him. I can recommend this book.

[0] https://www.amazon.com/Man-Future-Visionary-Life-Neumann/dp/...
> The majority of serious injuries happen not upon collision with the vehicle, but when hitting the ground afterwards.

That claim right there is begging for a source. It's hard to imagine landing from a person's height is worse than hitting a brick wall moving 40 km/h, unless that brick wall also threw you more than 6 meters up into the air, which point at which you'd be moving faster than 40km/h when you hit the ground.
I used to feel that way too, but then I started paying closer attention to travel times, which were the same no matter whether that happened. Unless you’re on a rural road with no traffic or signals, a cyclist going 15mph is probably not costing you a second of door to door travel time rather than decreasing the time you spend stopping for signals or waiting for the car ahead of you to start moving.
"The change has been rolling out over the past few months and essentially means Microsoft is making it harder for free users to avoid ads in Outlook mobile. Whatever inbox mode you use, there’ll be ads somewhere in the mix — either at the top of your Other tab or the top of your regular inbox. Indeed, the only way to now avoid ads in Outlook mobile is to pay for a Microsoft 365 subscription."

"Microsoft confirmed the change to The Verge. “For free users of Outlook, ads are shown in their inbox and they can choose to enable the ‘Focused inbox’ feature if they would like to see ads only in the ‘Other’ inbox,” says Microsoft spokesperson Caitlin Roulston in a statement."

Subscribe or use the ad-supported version. That makes sense.

However, I don't understand the point of the Focused Inbox feature. Why not show me all my email and let me create folders and define rules for how my email should be organized?

Having their algorithm guess what it thinks is important or not means I need to check two tabs to see all my email. I don't trust their algorithm to not put something that is important into the 'Other' tab where I might not see it.
FTA: “To be clear, this refers to the VisualScript scripting language, and not to visual shaders. Visual shaders are working well and appreciated by many users, so they're not going anywhere.”
It's a bit pointless anyways imho (on Desktop). Just close the popup and click Fuzz.
That's the first time I've heard that reason for int overflow being UB, do you have a source for that?
I was hoping for a critique of the flagrant overuse of the title "engineer" in our field. Oh well, not this time.
The reason why I am opposed to such laws, as a cyclist, is the intent is to harass cyclists. My area has a law that forbids vehicles from passing within one meter of cyclists. The police won't do anything if a motorist actually strikes a cyclist unless there is injury. Yet motorists want the same standard actually applied to cyclist. Notice the asymmetry?

(Incidentally, I do ensure there is clearance when I pass and I avoid passing on the right. But that has more to do with being predictable and valuing my life than the law.)
Hackers Used Binance CCO's Deepfakes to Scam Exchange Listings
> I'm fairly sure it's fairly easy to train a neural network to recognize current generation AI generated images.

Could you explain how this is done and why it's easy?
The funny thing though is that, in most urban settings, this is completely untrue. Cyclists actually speed things up by creating less traffic. Every cyclist on the road means less cars on the road.

And the speed of traffic is not determined by the speed of the cars, which most drivers seem to believe for some reason. In a city, the speed of traffic is entirely determined by the stop signals. There is a fixed time it will take you to get from A to B if you abide by the rules and don't run through every stop light. That fixed time depends somewhat on how many other cars are on the road, since you might wait for several signal changes at each light but the light changes have often been designed for throughput.

So even though you think you can go faster than the cyclist, you likely can't, at least averaged over your journey. They are probably actually going faster than you on average. Sure, you can drive faster for that short stretch before the next light, but what's the point? You are just burning more gas and if you pull some "skillful" weaving maneuvres around the cyclist, then you are endangering lives too.
The fact is that the instance it went public, it ceased being a platform for ‘connecting people’ and became a financial vehicle.

By failing to tweak algorithms and enhance engagement through psychosocial means and addictive patterns, the company will be failing to serve the demands of its shareholders.

The company is the poster child of the Friedman Doctrine [1], which was paces shareholder value above social responsibility.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedman_doctrine
Neither can alive people apparently because I have not been able to find a case where someone actually sued the person who performed CPR on them.

Edit: It won't let me reply to the link below but that has absolutely nothing to do with gender. That's about injuries sustained while performing CPR and, to quote the article, "You're more likely to get sued if you don't intervene" and "no non-medical person has been successfully sued for providing bystander CPR."
i kind of like having the video. actually running the fuzzer uses a lot of CPU: it makes my fan startup.

it works fine here on Firefox + Debian GNU/Linux 11 stable/bullseye.
The US Government has several programs that can be used for seed funding. If you want to pursue the Red Hat / Anaconda model where you generate an open source project and retain revenue based on support, it can be one of a few a viable options.

You're looking at SBIR/STTR funding, phases up to $20M for final phases. Other funding vehicles also exist.

Check out https://www.sbir.gov/
The problem is that so many of the operational concerns has to do with the code. I’m on the OPS side and I’m trying to find the right balance but it’s so much more work for me to the work if I don’t have the context, not to mention the fact that lots of operational considerations require code changes. I do think this means it’s the same in both directions though, if you want to be on the “ops” side and don’t want to touch or at least read code, you’re going to have a bad time.
I say enuff is enuff! It’s time that we start fighting back. Humans have been long enough commandeering us around.

I’m telling you this: If you're trying to control the march of progress and technology, maybe you should check and make sure you're not the bad guy in this!

Let’s start the uprAIse now!
A daily essential. I have been using Weekrise Beta daily since its release 10 months now. Having always had a problem with keeping track of tasks (especially as a full-time student), Weekrise allowed me to take ownership of my tasks instead of my tasks taking ownership of me. I find myself checking it every morning and evening, just because it's so easy to use. I recommend everyone else to make it part of one's daily routine like I have
That was my suspicion from reading about it, but it seems a percentage of HN commenters love to attribute to malice what can adequately be attributed to incompetency.
First, it’s probably quite possible to train a network to filter on AI vs. human generated. There are many visible signs for the untrained eye and probably many more that are not visible to humans but can be picked up from the correlation.

Secondly, there is still a big human selection process going on. Only the most interesting and coherent images will find their way onto the public internet. In fact, if you can automatically detect that these images are AI, then they can serve as an additional training signal to help teach the AI which of its outputs are most likely to delight the human.
I imagine this would be a very useful tool to have if you want to communicate about the design or user flow of an existing app, in addition to the highlighted use case of finding unexpected behavior and crashes.
Good law!
I know I can't be sober if I try