skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm so excited to share with you that Curatora.io is now LIVE on @ProductHunt.

It helps you easily find and share content on social media. With Curatora, you can add tags and annotations quickly, and share content with just one click. Keep your social media feeds flowing with content that's relevant to your audience!

And I would really appreciate your support, let us know your valuable feedback and suggestions in the comments.
> All apps are able to hook into the native video/voice call, Contacts and instant-notification reply interfaces.

From a privacy perspective, I hate this - Apple did this only to access more of our data. E.g. if anyone voice or video calls me on one of these apps, Apple has access to that metadata because it will now be listed in the recent call list that is under Apple's control. If I am using (for e.g.) WhatsApp or Signal, it's partly because I want to avoid iMessage and ensure Apple doesn't have access to more of my personal data.
Well that is the failure. If you don't give data to Google ( or Apple, or MS etc) you are considered by them as "a security and privacy risk.".
Their privacy and security is at risk.
My idea to reduce theft is that the city should provide not just the bike racks, but also the bike locks with those racks. Which means thieves have the option of either cutting the bike frame, or destroying city property which the police would probably have to actually pursue more seriously and which might be treated as a felony.
Not OP but check out this book [1]. Apress currently has back to school discount until the end of this week.

[1]Practical Cryptography in Python: Learning Correct Cryptography by Example:

https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4842-4900-0
More than 70% of pubs do not expect to survive winter as energy costs soar
You have a very legit point, in fact I mentioned that I don't agree or disagree with PP yet. With open source intelligence sourcing being as active as they are, was wondering if this phenomenon has been studied and or reported. I will not be surprised if the allegations are true, perhaps with a less sweeping scope, not that it makes it anymore palatable. The world seems to be being eaten piecemeal by populist authoritarianism.
The first thing that I try after generating an image from DALL-E is using reverse image search. I do it on every image that I intend to use, more often than not, I find a very similar image, in this case I discard it and vary my prompts.
> "if you don't use these digital systems you have to do things like they were before digital systems"

There's also the expectation from society. Even getting that covid shot was hard without an app, to the point of an extra long queue where nothing worked and in the end a lady told me sternly that I shouldn't be there and to get with the times and that I am young enough to be able to use a smartphone. As if that was the problem ...

That was just covid. Doing (non-trivial) taxes on paper involves some calculation, and I am liable if I get it wrong, whereas I know the web page does all calculations the right way.

Then there's school reports, public transportation, public libraries, calling in sick to work, taking out pension, the list is long and every single step of it is an inconvenience constantly reminding me to just stick with the non-free, mainstream, controlled by a private company, way.
> That doesn't make sense legally and regulators have given their blessing to the approach for Bitcoin I mentioned.

They have? Regulators have made an explicit statement on this? Can you link to it?
I would agree with all of those points, except for one. I do not think it is less dangerous to pedestrians. I remember when I used to live in the Netherlands, it was uncomfortable being a pedestrian because there were so many cyclists. They are still going fast enough that if they crash into you, you can expect a concussion or even worse. And they do not respect the traffic laws in the same way that cars do. And because of the numbers of them it is hard to keep track of them.
> people make a lot of excuses when confronted with something that they do not want to do

I am a cyclist who would want to do it a LOT more. And the main reason is two-fold.

One: cycling in London is scary, dangerous and extremely stressful. The cycling lanes, where they exist, are poorly maintained, tend to hop between the sides of the road at a rapid pace, and far too often cross with bus stops. On a bike you are forced to mix with car traffic more than if you simply _walked_ on the side of the road!

Two: I live at the bottom of a valley. Going anywhere starts by cycling a minimum of 2.5km uphill. Going anywhere interesting requires to take on a 5-7km uphill drive. Combined with the dangerous environment, being exhausted all the time adds to the risk. (FYI: on flat terrain I can do 25km on one go with little effort.)

Back in Finland I used to cycle ~170km a week during summers. In London, not a chance.
It definitely requires some very detailed descriptions and sifting through to find a good one. One time I've regenerated a prompt as well because the existing 4 were just not that good. But I did get some great ones at a pretty good usable:unusable ratio.
The configuration format is easily the worst aspect of nginx. There was a stretch where I got heavily into using it because it really is capable of quite a lot, but I could never totally grasp the config, despite how I've managed to learn pretty much any programming language given to me. Depending on what you're doing, a certain other thing may be totally moot or out of place, but it's certainly not obvious, and good luck actually debugging your nginx config without resorting to The Google. Once the config is set, nginx can do its job quite well, but it's bad if you're frequently making architectural changes.
Written laws are vague, practical verdicts are based on case law, cases are won by better-funded lawyers, rich industries prevail.

It's a bit of an exaggeration but maybe not too much.
A good rule of thumb is, if you are in dense complex traffic, to move your head around a bit when looking out and in the mirrors. Better coverage of dead angle in side mirrors, adding a bit more 3D into perspective.

Its sort of defensive driving - expect troubles, idiotic clueless drivers, people having heart attack or just turning head to yelling kid on backseat / nice lady walking nearby. Can't save it all but definitely helps.

Driving in country where people, when averaged, drive like crap is a good learning experience (albeit stressful). For me, whenever I enter France from Switzerland (on average 1x per week), its night and day and training (with cursing) resumes.
> Now that Zig has a significant VC backed flagship project

What did I miss this time? Would you please elaborate?!
Nobody wants you to do anything. People are just interested in data that can help them make better decisions.

By all means gorge on whatever. I don't care in the slightest. I care about my health.
No. Tablets and Phones do not have window managers. Also, a well defined side margin is not a "bad web trick" but an idea that's as old as print media, perhaps even as old as just written documents.
While Apple is in general better at privacy than Google (better can be far away from good), I think an Android user can theoretically be better protected. It just needs a lot of attention. But he would at least be able to do something against the "exceptions for the manufacturer". A locked down environment will always be comparably insecure. Not that Android phones aren't locked down...
Ask HN: Who use LDAP in 2022 and how?
Python is anything but a C-like language, I really don't know what you're talking about.
I'm quite confused. I understand why pushing directly to a main branch leads to faster development/deployment iterations, but doing a "reverse pull request" seems to me to be ineffective.

What happens in a situation when someone has some critical feedback in a reverse pull request? It's not like they can suggest changes and block the deployment after the fact. This seems super important for more tenured team members who may have a better understanding of the wider affects a change could bring to a different microservice.

Secondly, why review reverse pull requests? The change is already deployed, and there's likely to be too many to keep on top of for general informational purposes.
Well, it’s either echo chamber or garbage. Some nuance would be nice.
And again, Alphabet doesn't care =)

"This credit card messed with our money machine, it and everyone connected to it are now permanently blacklisted everywhere on our ecosystem."

They genuinely do not care who did what and whose number it was and who got hurt and whether it was used with or without permission. That CC tried to exploit the mighty money machine and that's it.
But is it straight-forward to set up on any PC, or just those locked down with proprietary single vendor controlled software?

In the latter case, it is not in any way better than a proprietary phone. In practice probably worse, since it is easier and cheaper to keep an extra phone around.
Did anyone at Meta consider that medium has a part to play in the success of TikTok's algorithm? Something which optimizes engagement for video content isn't necessarily going to work for text and images.
Porn addiction is already a serious problem for many people. Combine an enhanced version of this model with TikTok style delivery and I’m very fearful of the end result. It’ll be the equivalent of crack in terms of the dopamine rush
Pedestrians use much less space than cyclists and move slower, they typically also move away when they hear a car and most of them on such roads go in direction opposite to traffic flow so they see when a car approaches. Bicycles go in the same direction as traffic, sometimes swerve and go in small zigzag pattern, they don't have mirrors, don't look back and bicyclists are many times already tired from bicycling, they are also in more hurry than pedestrians (hurrying pedestrians also more often have accidents). In places where there are no sidewalks typically there are almost no pedestrians.
> clearing up the way as fast as possible is safer for both.

No. Speed kills, especially in the form of massive objects like a car. The car should slow and stay behind the cyclist until it is safe to overtake with adequate margin.
The risk of severe injury to a third party by my choosing to cycle drunk is much lower though. Maybe I hit a pedestrian and they are knocked over - it's possible but very unlikely that they receive life changing injuries. If you hit a pedestrian while driving a car they probably die.

Sure it's risky for me to ride drunk - but the risk is mostly on me. I've also had far more near misses sober in peak hour than drunk at 2am. The biggest risk at 2am is a drunk driver wilfully or accidentally runs a red light and t-bones me.
Here is the issue. As you can see from my previous comment I agree with you, that cyclists are a danger from a pedestrians perspective.
The problem from a cyclist's point of view is that having to stop every block to let pedestrians cross, would really really really suck on a bicycle; just losing all momentum and having to start from a stop. It would also probably be bad for the knees after a while.
The largest model airport and railway
Do the traffic lights actually detect bikes? Sometimes the sensors can only detect heavy objects like cars, so on a bike you can just be stuck waiting there an arbitrary amount of time if you want to obey the law.
They did offer this for a long time -- you could make friends lists, and then use them to focus on updates that belonged to those friends.

You can still make friends lists, but sometime in the last 2 years or so, they removed the feature to focus on updates from friends, and the friends lists don't do anything at all other than interact with privacy scope for your posts, which I guess is still nice.

IMO FB long ago decided it was going to be guided by metrics rather than theories about utility. Maybe they know better what users want than users do themselves, or maybe they care about other things, either way, the days of power users are done here.
We moved our app to Porter after the credentials incident this spring and have been very pleased.
I believe rustc and all its dependencies are only around 500M on my machine. Not tiny, but not the 2GB that GHC requires.
But the cars have expensive components that can be taken in seconds - fuel door broken and fuel siphoned, hood latch broken and battery or alternator stolen, valuables in cabin and boot. No need to move the vehicle to profit off it.
This is actually a mobile Currywurst / French Fries shack. Also its a woman. They need to clean their stuff after 4pm.

For some reason, that photo got replaced, the old one can still be seen here:

https://web.archive.org/web/20220822061137/https://innovatio...
I, for one, would love to see this come to fruition one day. Tools like esbuild have proven that front-end tooling does not need to be written in JavaScript, and seeing a Svelte compiler in Rust of all languages means that there could be some real innovation coming to this space.

Definitely starring.
Well, let me rephrase. NHS has for a long time been unable to spend money it considered necessary for a sufficient level of ongoing and preventative care.

At the tail end it certainly seems plausible, stories about lack of funds for hiring doctors, and visible queues at A&E have long been a staple of healthcare. What caused that tail-end lack of funds, I'm not sure.
Are you and your wife just really really tall? I mean, I haven't driven any one of these particular cars, but I drive a 90 HP, 50 MPG sedan that four average adults can fit in comfortably.

Some things that American aspiring tank drivers say can't be done, are an everyday occurrence in Europe.
The payment need not be decentralized for such a scheme to work (if it would work at all).
Let's be honest: given the opportunity (multiple lanes, etc.), the car would likely overtake a slow car as well, and stop at a red light right after that. I see that all the time (albeit I'm in Japan, not in the US)

Edit: point being, for some reason, some drivers really like to reach red light as quickly as they can, and that's not necessarily related to bikes.
Immediately thought about the movie "Corpse Bride" from Tim Burton, where the world of the living is grey and the world of the dead is very colourful.
https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0121164/
Have you ever tried riding a bicycle in the city?

Bicycle lanes in many cities are close to unusable.

For example:

- they are right next to parked cars and you can't ride on them without constant fear of getting doored

- they abruptly stop and there is no obvious place where to continue riding

- cars park on the bicycle lanes

- bicycle lanes go right next to crowded bus stops and there are so many people that it's impossible to ride

- crossings are designed in such a way that you need to wait for three (!) traffic lights to cross a single road, leading to a waiting time of at least 3 minutes

There are only a handful of roads with usable bicycle lanes in my city. And guess what: In places where bicycle lanes are usable, people use them. Nobody rides a bicycle on the road if there is a usable alternative.
I was not using the comment above.

Click on the link. See the section labeled "Book Description". The first paragraph following that label ends "It offers two specific reasons for this claim:"

And true enough there are two numbered point which follows. But they are not "two specific reasons". They are together one reason.

Let me illustrate what I mean by that:

Let's say I'm accused of being an axe murderer. In my defence I can offer the following argument:

1; i have proof that I was far away a few hours before the murder
2; the distance between where I was and where the murder happened is such that I couldn't possibly be there in time.

This is not two reason. This is a two sentence argument, and one reason. Let's see an example with two reasons:

1; I was far away from the crime scene, see proof...
2; I don't have arms, thus even if I were there I couldn't possibly wield an axe.

These are two separate reasons.

Why is this thing important? For two reasons:

Before I part with my money, and a substantial chunk of my free time, to read their argument I have to ascertain that they are worth this investment. To do this they have to signal in various ways that they are serious people and not bozos. Having impeccable book description would be in their favour in that department.

The second reason is even more important: If they truly would have two independent reasons to support their argument that would make it stronger. Even if they make some mistake in one, the other might still stand.

As it is now (based on the description and their first chapter exceprt) this is how their argument stands:

their thesis: artificial intelligence that could equal or exceed human intelligence is impossible.

1; The only way to engineer such technology is to create a software emulation
of the human neurocognitive system.

2; To create a software emulation of the behaviour of a system we would need
to create a mathematical model of this system that enables prediction of the
system’s behaviour.

3; It is impossible to build mathematical models of this sort for complex
systems.

These points form a chain. If any of these points is false, their argument fails. Thus they don't have two reasons, they only have one reason.

And I have serious doubts about every single of those statements alone. Which makes their arguments super shaky.
if a driver has to 'squeeze past', they are a bad driver.

if a driver is driving so close that they couldn't react to a cyclist falling, they are a bad driver.

You should drive within safe limits. If you cannot brake in the distance between you and the car in front, you are _too close_. If you squeeze to overtake, you are too close. Potholes exist. Wind exists. In the UK, the (edit) guidance is that you should pass a cyclist with as much a gap as you would pass a car (1m). The suggestion is 1.5m at 30mph (~50kmh). In other words, you should basically be in the other lane, as you would be if overtaking a car.

YES, driving slowly can cause accidents as drivers are impatient, but in most roads, waiting 10s for a clear passing spot isnt going to drastically change your journey time

...and if more people cycle, that means less people are in vehicles, so you have _more_ space on the road and less congestion. cars are very space-inefficient

(edit: formatting)
Yeah, it is as if they opened some sort of a sewer floodgate. My feed is a diarrhea of alt-right and communist propaganda right now, and everything in between.

It was pretty bad before but now it's completely unusable.
Probably, https://oven.sh/ ? (They have raised $7m from KP for https://bun.sh/)
That was one of the issues yes. The execve() thing.

But a bigger problem is that an app is not allowed to modify its own files anymore, and is not allowed to run executables from 'data' storage. This is much harder to work around:

https://wiki.termux.com/wiki/FAQ

Even if they work around the execve thing, Google will probably refuse them in the store when they run executables not included in the APK. And the question is what will be locked down in future Android versions. Android 12 is already iffy according to the above FAQ. That's why I'm worried about it

Fwiw: I don't think Google is actively trying to kill it, no. But it's just not something needed for most apps so they don't want to facilitate it.
And now the sender sending the "reset password" email is blacklisted by spamcop, I presume because they are sending so many emails from a server that normally doesn't much. They are not having a good day.

http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkblock&ip=192.254.122....
Ridiculous to continue peddling bikes as replacement for cars. Im Dutch and I grew up in a family with all of the environmentalist nonsense surrounding bikes. So I never wanted one. They stink after all and I had some trauma from biking through a cloud of exhaust in Rotterdam. I started following car lessons three years ago because of work reasons. It wasn't easy because I was so extremely late to the party at 32. Turns out cars are the bikes I always wanted. They are fast, you can take someone along. They carry a bunch. I can't believe the amount of times I walked through the city with say a bunch of wood making a fool of myself. I totally put myself at a social disadvantage to the point where I think I would have been held in much higher regard if I had had one before. An extreme waste of time.

That's not to say I hate bikes now. They are great for getting around the city when the weather is nice. They are also great for sport. But really get a license and a car the day you turn 18 if you can afford it.

There are better hopes for the environment too (ie electric scooters + public transport and electric cars/motorcycles, synthetic diesel fuel).
Kodi's pretty good too, and doesn't insist on showing unrelated online content you don't care about like Plex seems to.
How to play continuous blackjack
IANAL, but what you should be able to do is have a set of quotes of one or two sentences each from various sources (books, TV, movies, etc.) that have the modern word or idiom you are specifying. That should then be small enough to fall under fair use (like IMDB, wikiquote, etc. have quotes from films, and good reads, dictionaries, etc. have quotes from books/text), and be plenty enough to capture the meaning of the words/idioms.

You could create your own sentences that you control the copyright of containing the word or idiom, as those words and idioms themselves are not copyrightable. For example: "I fracking hate ice cream!"

For the rest, there is a lot of text upto 1926 (depending on when the author died) that is available for use, so you only need to capture words and idioms changed since then, including any pop culture terms.
Fighting the tides is one thing when sea levels have been stable for millennia. Now we're heading towards meters of difference in average levels by the end of the century. I fully expect most of the Netherlands and most coastal metropolises to be underwater by late 21st century.
Weylus – Use your tablet as graphic tablet/touch screen on Linux
That would be the amd64 driver port: https://wiki.freebsd.org/NvidiaFeatureRequests. For comparison, the first x86_64 driver version for Linux seems to be 1.0-4499 (https://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86-64/1.0-4499/) from 2003-09-02.
That is truly amazing
Would Agrawal get cash bonuses? If ... Under what conditions? (Anywhere to read about that?)

Aha, eg:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10258453/Twitters-n...

So his performance bonuses is more than 10x his salary - incentives to fake good numbers and hide the bad stuff, indeed!
PHP used to have amazing documentation back in the days.

Everything spelled out. No "you must read the whole thing or have worked with it for years to understand page 5".

Plenty of inline examples and even more user submitted ones (although as with all user generated content, some caution should be used when reading those).