skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Develop sufficient in-house subject matter expertise so that you're not depending on sales consultants to do your cyber program for you.

Develop an empirical understanding of risk management. While we can't predict the future, through well established techniques and adequate resourcing, professionals can achieve consistent results that are far better than random guessing. Risk management principles drive not just corporate stragegy writ large, but entire industries like banking and insurance.
Considering the stories you can read in the security engineer handbook[1] written by FAANG security engineers I’m willing to believe that.

[1]: https://securityhandbook.io/
The problem with end-to-end encryption, is that you just have to have the vendor’s word for it, and its next client version can be compromised anytime.
MoviePass will return on September 5th with plans starting at $10 per month
Rumors of the Apple car have died down (I think ...) but they may come back to the transportation market, maybe out of left field. Repurposing the iPod trademark?

(E.g. this for the XXI century: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isetta )
But this is an EU proposal; the EU doesn't have a constitution.

The European Convention on Human Rights applies in all EU member states.
Austria is considered a part of german speaking world
Last week I was stopped next to a bunch of ladies in a black and pink Wrangler with cancer ribbons on it. First time I’ve ever felt the need to comment on a car. It was meaningful and very tastefully done. They were delighted for the compliment so I must have managed not to sound creepy.
There's a lot of limitations within those protocols that just make things unnecessarily difficult and limit functionality. Port numbers and the lack of logical service names, lack of routing across disparate unroutable routes, lack of carrying forward/back diagnosis of network segments, etc. HTTP as an additional transport protocol is a shitty hack that people use to work around some of those issues but more remain.
Java solutions for JS and WebAssembly as targets are older than Blazor actually, see TeaVM and CheerpJ, and then there was GWT alongside Vaadin.
> I think what's making me not like this idea is that it wouldn't do much for wealth disparity. If you're Wealthy with a capital W, you don't really spend that much, compared to your income.

These problems can be solved via extremely high estate taxes or property taxes.
Being too common now is interesting when it didn't used to be.
I agree, it only make sense if you have so much excess solar that you don’t know what to do with it in peak production.
Even then, you need to factor in the depreciation of the hydrogen facilities.
I'm all for extremely strict border enforcement. Much more strict than we have now.

ONLY if there is a low/no-cost, simple to navigate, fast, ethical and humane immigration system for individuals to apply to.

Because without that, all we have is a system that forces individuals into a life of "crime" for just wanting better for themselves and their families. Look at those pictures (obviously the items were chosen for their emotional impact) but what kind of a terrorist is carrying Chip and Dale action figures or a Patrick Star purse?
The blog post about the EU proposal is insanely scary. It "boasts" about 88% accuracy in "grooming" and 90% accuracy in new CSAM. And it also has this line, which is just so obviously horrendous:

>the proposed obligations on service providers as regards the detection of CSAM are technologically neutral, meaning they do not prescribe which technology should be used for detection as long as the chosen technology meets the high standard of conditions and safeguards to protect all users. It is an obligation of result, not of means.

Literally saying "The ends justify the means" when it comes to detecting CSAM. Remember, it NEVER has to do with protecting anyone. Governments do what gives them more power or they are already incentivized to do, and nothing else. And with no voter pressure against these types of laws, it's obvious what will happen.

https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2019-2024/joha... Here is the link to the blog post.
There are several lessons to draw from this:

1. Yes, Kyrsten Sinema is the current villain but in truth, she was probably doing it as a favor to Chuck Schumer. Schumer is the Senator from Wall Street. Money coming from Wall Street is why he is majority leader;

2. It's surprising how cheaply politicians can be bought;

3. While Sinema is the villain here, you should know there is always a rotating villain in the Democratic Party. Today it's Sinema. A month ago it was Manchin. In Obama's first term it was Joe Lieberman. This isn't an individual problem. It's a systemic problem. That's because the Demoratic Party operates as a controlled opposition party, not a governing party. The job of the Democratic Party is simply to fundraise off of how awful the Republicans are without actually having to do anything. I mean how many fundraising texts and emails were sent when the Dobbs decision was handed down?

4. Legislative bodies have a position called the whip. The job of the whip is to whip votes, meaning getting votes and getting an accurate count of votes. The Republican Party is very good at whipping votes. You see this with those who voted to impeach Trump getting primaried. A great example was Madison Cawthorn. This is a long and fascinating story but he came out of Kevin McCarthy's office looking like he'd been physically beaten. The Democrats need to emulate this particular aspect of the Republican Party but, as stated above, the reason they don't is the Democratic Party is happy being the controlled opposition party.

In the same situation, the GOP would absolutely primary both Manchin and Sinema when they were up for reelection.
Interesting, maybe it would fit in https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Main_Page
Nobody seems to know how you can build a successful security org
Some of the time.

With wfh, it's normal that I leave walking distance twice every week. Taxis, uber, or a rental car for a trip would definitely be cheaper.
>He was saying the USA should leave NATO.

Ah yes, the other line that people pull when questioned on this topic.

First, Trump did not say that the US should leave NATO. He publicly insisted/cajoled/prodded with that signature Trump charm and style that Germany and other NATO members who don't meet the 2% of GDP spending requirement—and showed zero inclination of actually meeting the 2026 deadline (itself pushed back repeatedly after first being set in 2006)—needed to do so.

>In our day and age you should be arrested as traitor for saying that.

Beyond the strange notion that an American should be "arrested as a traitor" for his words, a "traitor" to whom?

Who benefits more from NATO membership, the US or Germany? Who benefits more, the US or Belgium? The US or Norway? The US or Italy?

Would a Russian conquest of all of Ukraine endanger US security? Not really. It is Poland that would have Russian troops on hundreds more miles of its borders. It is Poland and the Baltic states that now face the risk being cut off from the rest of NATO at the Suwalki Gap.

The funny thing is that Poland and the Baltics do meet the 2% spending requirement, and have so for years. It is the likes of the far wealthier Germany, Belgium, Norway, Italy that do not. When you say that a US president should have been "arrested as a traitor" for questioning the value ("obsolete", I believe he said) of a military alliance in which the US funded 69% of total military spending while the wealthiest other members (with the notable exception of the UK) do not, have not, and (until February 2022) would not ever meet the bare minimum expectations set for them, I ask again: A traitor to whom?

>The man is an idiot.

An idiot who was, as I yet again point out, 100% right on the biggest crisis to face Germany in 75 years.

Trump and NATO secretary-general and former Norwegian PM Jens Stoltenberg argue on camera (video <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpwkdmwui3k>, article <https://pbs.org/newshour/politics/at-nato-trump-says-germany...>) about dependence on Russia four years ago. Who turned out to be right? Who turned out to completely, totally, 100% wrong?

Trump at the UN warns that Germany is endangering itself by increasing dependence on Russia. German envoys laugh <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfJv9QYrlwgepe>, including foreign minister Heiko Maas. Who was right, Trump or Maas?

Either answer my question, or shut up about the "idiot"/"traitor"/"Orange Man Bad".
I did a quick Twitter search, and unfortunately your story isn't supported by any tweets I can find. Good news: you get to write a story about conspiracy theories about Gates and mosquitoes instead though! https://twitter.com/lorijean333/status/1561224522166067201?s...
Some things it impacts includes:

1) Your safety net. If you lose, will they help you out so you at least aren't totally destitute?

2) Your social/professional network, and (correlationally) your access/ability to develop one, or funders and other technical assistance.
I suspect the system works as intented. American economy and people profit off of illegal immigrants' cheap labor, but at the same time the legal system does not recognize them, so that they can be squeezed even more with no recourse. That's how the country was built in the past and that is what it is still doing - and it's working extremely well. I don't believe it will ever be changed.

Oh, and H1-B is the same principle, but for coders and such. It has to be made nicer, because coders have better options worldwide - but it's only made as nice as absolutely necessary to keep the cheap people coming in.
I've recently gotten a lot of good guidance on security best practice from a new boss. A great place to start is the CIS 18 critical security controls. They cover most things for protecting an organization.

Walk through the controls list, see where you compare to the controls and sub-controls and then start to establish a path forward.
I was referring to his Only Fans "agency" but I actually somehow forgot the far more blatant and very much not legal thing he stands accused of: https://thesportsgrail.com/andrew-tate-house-raided-in-roman...
Modern bicycles on modern roads have better range and are far faster than horses. The problem in 1800s London was that bicycles weren't invented yet and the roads weren't asphalt. Vulcanization was only invented in 1839. The Pony Express for example averaged to 10 miles per hour and had stations every couple of miles.
Also lets not forget that the NYC metro moves more people daily than the entire air travel network in the US does. It moves an incredible amount of humans at a scale that cars and airplanes just can't even begin to approach in a million years.
Something definitely needs to be done about these big tech companies not having any appeals processes when they flag/suspend somebody. I know somebody whose business basically got shut down by Paypal and he never got an explanation or a way to rectify things.

Makes me wonder more and more whether the tech companies are so profitable because of their tech or whether they are so profitable mainly because they cut corners by not hiring people who can deal with customer support. They are the perfect embodiment of faceless bureaucracy and Kafka-esque processes.
haha my job makes me rewrite sql that Data analysts come up with into spark jobs in scala. Their main argument is that sql isn't unit testable like scala.

This grunt work of sql =>spark translation is easily the most boring part of my job.

Other than that, I do kind of agree that sql isn't really good at large scale programming.
There is no ide support while you are working, hard to extract common logic , hard to reuse , hard to compose, hard to unit test. All these things have been mainstays of conventional programming.
With the example of the doctor you run into the nocebo effect - you can spend a lot of time tracking down things that turn out to be of very low value which ends up causing more harm than good. To painfully extend the metaphor you could have an overly aggressive password policy and end up having users reusing passwords or writing them down.
I’m a security engineer and nobody knows what’s best practice. Everyone is making it up at this point, and security is still a nascent field. Most companies don’t even have a security team.

I think it’s still not clear how you should build a security org, and if you should at all (should security be part of normal workstreams of your devs?)

Btw I wrote about my experience in https://securityhandbook.io/
The full lineup for Git Merge 2022 revealed
12 Bar of peer pressure
I saw this happen live and I couldn't believe it. There was this Netflix movie last year called "Kate" that has a white female assassin killing a lot of asian people (it takes place in Tokyo). There were a handful of articles (first in places like Yahoo news and then sites like Slate.com) written about how this is racist and they all quoted people on twitter. Since I was following this movie heavily, I saw the tweets come in real time and the subsequent articles written a day later. In the end it all started from one tweet from a random user which then spread into a small handful other people making a similar comment and then leaving it at that. These tweets then got turned into multiple articles. I could not believe how crazy the whole thing was.

The original tweet author did not give permission for her thoughts to be published in so many articles and apparently endured a lot of harassment(She indicated this on subsequent tweets). She eventually deleted the tweet.

This was the original tweet: "Shame on Netflix for this. After this past year especially, to then release a film that is literally white people murdering Asian people based on stereotypes and fetishization??? Hard pass.”

If you google that quote you'll see how many articles quote that tweet.

There were no winners in this whole saga. The movie takes place in Tokyo so of course asian men are going to be the bad guys. So Netflix endured negative press for nothing. The press didn't actually change anything about the film, it obviously pissed off enough people that it caused them to start looking for the tweet author to harass her and finally she deleted her tweet. Who were the winners? The site owners making the money I guess. The whole thing really shows how much of a joke online media is. When regular establishment press is not that good either, what are people to do?
I thought we tried this already...
> Democracy turned out to be easily manipulatable with large sums of money and media control.

Is it, though? Establishment interests spend huge sums of money and often lose. The Republican party was an elite country club party, but when evangelicals emerged as a political force, the party had to jump on that wave, no matter how distasteful the old party elites found it. Then Trump came along, giving blatantly shallow lip service to religion, and now the party is beholden to him. That wasn't in anybody's plan except Trump's, and his personal wealth was paltry next to the Republican Party's resources.

But maybe the elites who do the manipulation are happy to pander on a few issues if they get what they want on the issues that are really important to them. Let's think about that. If there was one core tenet of the GHWB-era Republican Party that its elites would have wanted to protect above all else, what would it be? If there was one core tenet that united all American economic elites, one thing above all others that they would want to instill in voters' heads, wouldn't it be economical liberalism? More specifically, free trade? Well, they've failed at that. NAFTA was a banner achievement for the Republicans. Now Trump calls NAFTA a Clinton disaster and promotes trade war with China, and he runs the Republican Party, because it does matter what the voters want, and you can't outright buy their belief in anything.

We blame voters for being bought and manipulated when someone speaks to them in a way they find compelling but "shouldn't" according to our worldview. We assume that the superiority of our worldview gives us a natural advantage, and we look for special reasons why our views don't prevail. "What's the matter with Kansas?" in other words. What's the matter is that Trump's voters really do care more about Trump licking their wounded egos more than they care about anything else.
Enterprises that aren't going to rewrite from scratch and rather look forward to solutions to keep existing code running.

The same reason IBM and Unisys keep their mainframes and microcomputers running with updated hardware.
Typo 'hydraulic brakes' was intended.
Compared to the set of all countries that’s very good company
>>> I guess they just ate the cost?

We did, through our taxes and insurance premiums and opportunity costs. We paid for average care plus the greatest medical rentier system in the galaxy.
> Why do you think this?

Because it's happened before. Systems put in place nominally to fight child abuse end up being used for copyright enforcement.
Do any of your cassettes from that era still load?
No he's not. He's literally on the CIA payroll along with the rest of CDC.

He has a track record of making up ridiculous stories that serve his task masters. Remember the "Hong Kong Blondes"? Oh right it turned out to be completely fake.
Spotify's recommendation system is so bad, that when I find a song I like, I put it into Pandora's free tier to find more songs. I hate how Spotify likes to prioritize every other song from that artist, and every other song from that genre, over songs from other artists and genres that sound similar to the song I want recommendations for. Pandora seems to prioritize the sound of the song, and actually finds similar songs.
the global username by ethereum name service (ENS)

see fallon.eth
rude response.

i said 'usually' .
They'd have to resell them abroad though, the local market would be pretty much saturated, no?
The replacement candidates are also both sure that the main issues facing the UK public are "woke" politics and trans people[0], and seem entirely unphased about the pending crisis around energy bills and the price of food. And the opposition seem pretty uninterested in taking advantage of this massive open goal. Incredible.

[0] no, not in a nice "let's all remember to treat LGBTQ+ compassionately and with respect" way
This will never fly in Germany. Those people still have internet cafes without surveillance cameras so they can do their computing anonymously. Paranoia is a way of life there, for good reason.
Ahh they typical brigade is definitely in effect even above this post... A bunch of comments to suppress the real ones made, just like what happens on Twitter regularly.

I had to scroll down past the posts dismissing the issues to get to this one. The news at this point is also conveniently not trending on Twitter even though I am pretty sure a lot more people are Tweeting about it than about Doja Cat right now (who is trending).

I also didn't even see the article, tweeted by CNN, even though I follow them on Twitter.

We're officially chest deep in the era where nothing popular on the Internet is trustworthy nor credible, and where nothing works as expected.

My solution is the same as it always has been... Never respect them enough to enter your real (government) name, and never post anything that you can't afford to have compromised. There is no end to what modern data greed will use your data for.
So prices will likely go up. The cheapest new cotton t-shirt for sale in a brick and mortar store in my city is $4, which is a ridiculous price given a human physically assembled it. It seems to me that, as a proportion of total cost, the price of cotton can stand to increase if that's the retail price floor right now.
Germany has many anti-privacy laws like the Impressum system which forces website owners to essentially dox themselves on a public webpage. I’m not sure where the misconception that Germany had strong privacy laws came from.
Wranglers seem to be a popular form of self-expression, I suppose because they're very customizable and obviously include a lot of flat surfaces (and still mostly steel, so magnets work).
The girls were having significantly less number of wheels.
None of us are entitled to anything.

Human laws reinforce power and social dynamics, stable equilibrium solutions the result of thousands of years of human conflict.

There are no "rules" beyond physics, and the rule breakers often wind up ahead.

The rule makers don't want to pay for those that cannot contribute more than they consume. To put it another way, they don't want their taxes to go up. One lever to control this is through immigration policy.

The voting class is told unskilled immigrant labor is a net negative. Skilled labor, a positive. One side tells them skilled labor threatens their jobs and total compensation, another side tells them it's alright and that we're at a shortage for labor. There are abstract reasons you can point to for each of these ideologies, but ultimately each side is fundamentally concerned with money.

Every one of us is ultimately about consuming energy. For those of us fortunate enough, we can care about Starbucks, how many homes we own, and what kind of luxury goods we have. But at the end of the day, if it were all taken away and we had to fight for food and energy, nearly every one of us would.

Step out into the Serengeti alone and you'll be eaten. There are no rules.
Except that a lot of those 50 people instead consume all kinds of other "news media" who by now regularly use Twitter as a source, so they are still indirectly affected by Twitter even if they don't actively use it.
> There’s also this weird delusion that if you put some dirty money in a box with clean money and shake it, then it all comes out as clean — and not that it all comes out as dirty.

That's the exact take that brought to closure of tornado.cash. If you start with two distinct piles and at the end you only get one some-of-these-might-be-dirty pile, the solution to this is to destroy the mixer, not to sift through bank notes. The reason why we don't consider everything that has touched dirty money to be tainted is explicitly to protect people who may have been inadvertently brought into it.
I personally appreciate the loss of color. Color is amazing when its in harmony, like we see in nature. 99% of what people and corps wear/make clashes and is garish. Its the same as sugar in all our food, you loose subtlety.
And should RCS die we're stuck with SMS/MMS. Awesome.
Building a successful security organization is very easy, it just starts higher up the food chain than whatever experts you hire to do it. Security is a cultural practice, it's not a feature, it's not a bolt-on. To the extent that your security organization influences and receives buy-in from your corporate culture, becoming a part of your organization's identity, it will be successful.
I do not find it useful to describe a single voter as being THE vote that causes something to pass or fail. Presumably, the other 50 or so senators that voted against had similar motivations as Sinema, so why would I assume she was “bought and paid for” any more than the others were?
I used to work in the music industry and gaming the charts was common.
So host it in a different country?
This is a complete misunderstanding of the corporate and human motivation. Corporations are run by people, specifically by rich people who spend their time in elite circles with a set of acceptable cultural and political beliefs. Everyone in the US knows what those are, and what happens to people who are seen as supportive of "deplorables".

CEOs also, like all humans, don't want angry hoards of very online people (blue checkmarks) screaming at them, and have shown time and time again they are willing to bend to the mob to make the screaming stop.
The sky hasn’t fallen?? Have you read https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/21/technology/google-surveil... ?
Sorry, sarcastic remarks with no discussion don't get upvotes. That is standard here, unlike on Reddit.