skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
_these rights may only be interfered with on the basis of a law_. There is a law that covers it, just as there is a law that covers all the restrictions to freedom when you commit a crime. Killing in self defense is not a violation of the constitution. That's outlandish.

Killing in a war is not in violation of the constitution. The GG itself establishes an army used for territorial defense. Article 24(2) covers the case of integrating that army into a defense and security pact (NATO, EU army, UN) and from that derives the right to deploy german soldiers in NATO and UN missions. And if they have to kill on those missions, they are _not in violation of the GG Article 2_

Edit: When reading the GG, you also need to take into account that there are many fundamental rights that are in contradiction to each other. These need to be balanced out, there's no single right that always trumps the others. Take the case of an armed robbery: My right to my property (which is codified in Art 14) is opposed to the right of the robbers physical integrity (or even life). It would be outlandish to resolve this as "the robbers right to not be hurt trumps my constitutional right" and indeed, there is the Notwehrparagraph (StGB § 32 Notwehr https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stgb/__32.html) which codifies your right to self defense with whatever means necessary to stop the attack. (The boundaries of what's necessary are murky and difficult to generalize, but let's leave that aside here)
How long before people start conflating this story with Musk in an attempt to discredit both, you mean?
El Sueño Americano / The American Dream
I thought high costs for international SMS and MMS is what caused WhatsApp to explode. I remember it being the first app with great UX for sending and receiving pics/video/contacts, and then they added group messaging which worked great as well.

No spam because you needed SMS text verification, no ads, no login to remember, just all around amazing app at the right place at the right time.
When I last looked into fully homomorphic encryption in 2017, the algorithms were still not at an applicable place. Sure, we may have polynomial time algorithms for FHE, but it doesn't help anything in practice if those polynomials are not reasonable themselves.
> forcing these apps to be able to federate

I predict it'll 'work' so that the companies aren't fined by the EU, but the service will be atrocious.

You'll probably have to jump through a lot of hoops to make it work, and even then you'll probably have to wait 5 minutes for messages to be delivered, have to deal with bugs galore, and have most of the features not work.

"Warning: Sending an animated emoji will eject all non-iMessage users out of this group conversation".
> The fragmentation of these third party apps gets frustrating very fast though.

Agreed, although where I live, most people have consolidated on Telegram. WhatsApp was popular about 5 years ago, but its popularity has quickly waned because of how difficult inter-device use is.
> > Does someone have recommendations for US based E-Mail providers which are reliable and "not free"?

> Buy a refurbished server rack and mount it anywhere in US

Not anywhere. You won't get very far trying to host an email server on a residential Internet connection.
I did not enjoy the attitude displayed in this article.

Yes, notes, often containing the most sensitive material of our lives should be encrypted at every stage of the lifecycle.
Taiwan has a completely different demographic and a negative birth rate and no real immigration "problem" and to me it is clear that the negative birth rate is indeed more related to the cost of living crisis than it is to other factors that people like to attribute it to. Their salaries have stagnated for 30 years, while cost of living has skyrotted for anyone but expats. In relation to the income Taipei is one of the most expensive cities in the world. Who wants children if you have to live in a room in your parents flat(at 35) because you can't afford to live on your own.

And yes, while Germany and other European countries have great benefits for child rearing, regardless of that a lot of Germans are actually struggling being able to afford living in the cities. Everyone here, myself included probably makes a lot more than an average worker in Germany.
> Technology independent regulatory framework is one of the main reasons Canada has so many reactor startup

Canada's vast tracts of land wouldn't hurt either. If a meltdown or containment breach happens, and no population centers are within 400km, that's a much better bad scenario.
The Expanding CXL Memory Hierarchy Is Inevitable – and Good Enough
> The reason is that SMS is dying and being replaced by better encrypted clients.

Each of which is a wall gardened onto itself. So instead of having one app where I can chat, I have App A to talk with Group-of-Friends 1, App B to talk with Group-of-Family/Friends 2, App C…

Thanks, but I'll happily give up E2EE to not have to deal with the above hassle.

At that point I might as well give up on SMS/RCS and go back to only sending e-mails which is an open, federated standard.

> […] and makes the current situation worse since Google has their own proprietary version of RCS.

AFAICT, the only thing "proprietary" about Google's implementation is E2EE: otherwise it's a fairly standard RCS client that can talk to any other RCS client. I'd be happy if Apple did the same thing with iMessage (app): standard SMS/RCS client when sending to non-iMessage people, and 'fancy' client (blue bubbles) between iMesssage users.
Accessing WebAssembly reference-typed arrays from C++
Since RCS is a chat standard backed by Google, I wonder which company would spend money and time to support it. I guarantee, regardless of adoption, in two years, Google will have killed RCS or gotten out of it, maybe leaving it to carriers.

Google is not in it for the long haul. Companies whose entire modus operandi is providing value to paying customers (e.g. Apple) will do well to steer clear.
Mudge is a very credible source. Interesting to see where this goes. Twitter has gone through more security heads than any high tech company should. Not surprised it’s a chaotic environment.
They won’t adopt RCS
Not going to happen in 50 years, probably more. I still see a lot of >20 yo cars, lots of people simply can't afford a new or even used car.
Let alone trucks: my father was a concrete mixer truck owner (sorry I don't know exact word for that), when fully loaded the truck run 300 meters with one liters of diesel, it's more than 30 liters per 100kms.
No it is not. RCS provides valuable features for users which are not present in SMS.
The EU commission members are appointed by each member state.
Not in austria
The time to mine a block is "constant", in that it takes an average of 10 minutes whatever the network size.

When the mining rewards peter out, big ASIC farm miners leave the network, the mining difficulty goes down, and so does the energy and hardware investment required to mine a single block. But at the same time, smaller time miner can enter the network and mine with less powerful hardware.

If all miners were to quit tomorrow, the difficulty would go down so much that you could mine a block, in 10 minutes, with a Raspberry Pi Zero.
I'm not sure why this is being framed as an XOR situation? Why would RCS support imply removal of iMessage?

Surely RCS raises the lowest common denominator up a bit from SMS, and people are still free to use whatever 3rd party data-based messaging service they want to, be it iMessage, WhatsApp, Signal, Facebook Messenger, or whatever else, even ICQ if that still exists.

I don't think I've ever intentionally/deliberately chosen to use RCS, but (on my (Android) phone at least) it does seem to transparently turn itself on the very rare occasion when I send SMS messages (usually in reply to a received SMS), if supported by both phones.
Bob Dylan’s legal team sues lawyers behind sexual abuse lawsuit
You claim was that the GG imposes immigration on the unwilling german citizenship. That's just plain wrong. Are there applicants for asylum that try to apply despite not being covered? Probably. Is that in the GG? No.
I remember learning `<P>` this way in 1994. (And it was awhile before I saw `</LI>` end tags.)

Coincidentally, in April of this year, I got an urgent request from someone parsing 1994-era HTML, to change the ancient Racket permissive HTML parser, to support the even more ancient 1994 `p` elements better: https://www.neilvandyke.org/racket/html-parsing/#%28part._.H...
> I run an agency and we maintain dozens of large, mature production projects (up to ~100k lines of code each).

100k is not small, but also not particular large; even for one single app with highly interweaved code. My companies main codebase is around 800k lines and I consider it as middle sized.

But lines of code are not the problem. The length of your code paths is it. Understanding the flow of one or two functions, ok, not that hard of a problem. Having your data flowing through some dozen functions, big problem. Complexity kills any understanding at some point. Or you need to invest unnecessary much time for it.
Freedom is pretty meaningless when you're without basic necessities for survival. Better socioeconomic safety nets would increase freedom for the vast majority of Americans - homeless ones included.
this was interesting, war poems in times of war. It must be dreadful.

But on another page - the text is embedded in what seems to be a seo op, the war of index position, clicks and which of the best 15 Sonoma Wineries you should visit in 2022 - I wonder what the poetry is on that.

I guess the original text is at https://spotterup.com/war-poetry-randall-jarrell/
https://youtu.be/Dhwcc-iiNJQ
For MySQL, the price of popularity comes with a flood of questions from users on how to solve specific data-related issues. That's where this cookbook comes in. When you need quick solutions or techniques, this handy resource provides scores of short, focused pieces of code, hundreds of worked-out examples, and clear, concise explanations for programmers who don't have the time (or expertise) to resolve MySQL problems from scratch.
Need more of these!
RCS is inferior to iMessage simply because it doesn't work on tablets and desktop computers. Since RCS is tied to mobile carriers, who don't want to give up control over those juicy messages, the problem will persist forever.
People with outsized influence over politics, for example.
unlike fixed records, dictionaries access is impossible to optimise via JIT like PyPy
The ideal approach would depend on your architecture. It's really easy and cheap to create new queues on the Apify platform (we create ~500k every day) so we usually run a crawler per domain. It performs the best and it's the easiest to set up.

On Crawlee level, you can open new queues with one line of code and name them with the hostname, so the most straightforward solution would be to run multiple Crawler instances with multiple queues and then rate limit using the options explained here https://crawlee.dev/docs/guides/scaling-crawlers and push the new URLs to the respective queues using the URLs' hostname.

If you'd like to discuss this a bit more in depth, you can join our Discord or ask in GitHub discussions. Both are linked from Crawlee homepage.
Do you have something that allows you to publish that as well?

Use case - I want to keep some notes for myself e2e on my laptop & phone but every now and then I'd like to publish a few of them under a pseudonym anonymously on the internet.
For shades of grey you just need titanium dioxide. It is white and not something people worry about if it is in food.

For reasons I don't understand, many colours need fairly toxic chemicals. Just think of the names. Cadmium Yellow, Cobalt Blue - would you like a bit of strontium nitrate with that?

Because we eat food and have children, we can't have all the colours that we used to have. We can't even have lead in paint these days.

This is just one factor, and it supports my general belief that progress in fashion/art/design is technology driven.

Regarding bland houses, what do you expect when the only people buying homes are doing so in order to rent seek/flip the property? Particularly when IKEA is just a short drive out of town.

Cars is the same deal, paint technology has changed to be less toxic and people buying cars aren't buying them with their own money to own forever. They got to get that resale at the end.
>One other major downside of end-to-end encryption: everything has to be done client-side, and the server becomes very close to a dumb pipe and block storage.

That sounds like a feature...
RHEL5 more likely based on when twitter was founded
Allen McHose perhaps? :)
Depends on the country. In Czechia, unlimited SMS plans used to be expensive.

That changed, but e.g. with my pre-paid plan I still pay 12 cents per SMS.

Historically there was also a problem that unlimited SMS plans worked only within a country. Now it's a bit better being EU-wide, but still not worry free.
It is also an issue for Android users in general. In large group chat instantiated by an iPhone user, Android users may be unable to respond. My mother has encountered that on numerous occasions.
Yep. I don't want mobile carriers to be anything but dumb pipes.
Fujitsu to Start Selling Quantum Computers in 2023
>> Our team will never read or access your note content, unless we have received your express permission during a customer support interaction

What a relief!

I'd take it at their word then, trusting random employees at a random corporation, in a world where even police officers routinely get caught snooping at private data unrelated to their work (e.g. girlfriends and such).

/s
> because... what else?

Perhaps SQL is so good that it couldn't be replaced all these years. But yes, debugging could have been better.
If you take a random directed graph and separate the nodes in two sets A and B you would expect* the arrow from A to B to be about the same as those from B to A regardless of the relative size.

* on average on all partitions with |A| \le |B|
Libraries written in SQL. I'm sure one can search for let's say a snippet that will create a date dimension table for a data warehouse and copy it but it's pretty clunky compared to even Python modules.

I'm criticizing SQL as a language which is lacking in composability (as opposed to criticizing relational algebra or relational data model).

Libraries for working with SQL (full-fledged ORMs or simpler query builders) are themselves written in a different language so they don't necessarily prove anything about SQL itself, though one could argue that if people want to use them then they might not be satisfied with raw SQL.
> Kato has 4000 followers on twitter https://twitter.com/TrofimovaKato
> Jose has 2300 on twitter https://twitter.com/josegasparian

Still very, very small potatoes

> It's a art market, even if you don't want to see it. I just took two random artists out of a hat that I like.

No, it's not. It's an art market used as a proxy for something else. I like art. I get reselling it. But when you buy a bunch of stuff and immediately put it back for sale for a few bucks more, that's not art appreciation. In the best case it's arbitrage, in the worst case it's something more sinister.

> You're also of course conveniently ignoring DeeKay because he doesn't fit your pattern - he just had a piece recently sell for 1$ million.

It's very much an outlier yes, so probably something very different.

I don't really buy that this piece makes somebody feel anything worth paying $1M for. Come on, we've been doing this theme for ages. Here's an ad based on that concept: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brsI6z13Su8 -- it's from 2002.

If somebody has $1M to spend on a single picture, why would they? They could hire a dozen artists for a year. Have them safely work on some sort of masterpieces, or have them at the patron's beck and call to make any random ideas the patron has.

There are reasons to spend $1M on a single art piece, but pretty much none of them have anything to do with the art.
A world-wide, decentralized, communications platform sounds lovely. Oh wait...
I think there are some important questions that need to be answered before such a dangerous decision should be made.

How big is the risk of a child being groomed through these electronic means? Is it comparable to being struck by lightning? What is worse weighted by probability: being sexually assaulted as a child or being suspected and having your life turned upside down for years by these algorithms. We already see these things happen with relatively minor things like having your google account closed by an algorithmic mishap.

How was this 10% number of false positives determined? Is this only an expectation of false positives or an actual statistic.
What does 10% mean in the context of mass surveillance?

It might well be that millions of children are groomed and assaulted every year through chats. I don't have the data so i cannot say. I was under the impression that most sexual assault cases happen in the family and not by strangers.

What's worrying though is that these decisions are taken behind closed doors without any oversight, on the hope that they might save a child and possibly putting our lives in the hands of algorithmic justice.
The people who those people watch on TV (or read in newspapers) use twitter, though.
Except for Lord Howe Island in New South Wales, Australia, where local time changes by 30 minutes.
I think YouTube has the same problem all other content providers have. Good content that's genuinely worth watching is rare and there's no factory method that will produce it. Hence, all the full-time content creators have to settle for reliable and steady production of mediocre content, or go out of business. In my opinion, the recommender algorithm doesn't show me good (according to my taste) recomendation not because it sucks, but because there just isn't anything left on youtube it could recommend me that I would like.
You can use GPT-3 for relationship advice, but should you?

Could you elaborate a little more on what you're asking? Perhaps an example?

I feel as if any use case like this, — particularly if it crosses into interpersonal relationships and disagreement — risks being incredibly dangerous as far as reinforcing your own biases.

It should go without saying that to even consider this, you should have a solid grasp of the fundamentals of these LLMs, their limitations and inherent biases, and their tendency to unconditionally agree with you regardless of your position – particularly in a dialog-style format.

One clearly problematic use case would be asking about an interpersonal conflict where there exists an established societal and cultural power imbalance.

E.g., describing a disagreement between a man and a woman and asking for insight into that conversation would be incredibly flawed, no matter how objectively it were depicted.

This isn't an attack on you nor am I claiming you're doing anything at this level, but taken to the extreme it’s something I can easily imagine someone doing after reading your post.

I’d really just like people to be cautious. After all, this is the same language model that told me a social media post contains hate speech due to “negative sentiment towards a protected class (racists)”.
"It's because you have to be dreaming to believe it."
> Other similarities might be market share, i.e. EIC controlled 50% of world trade at its height [1] vs Google's Search being used by 52% of the world in 2019 [2].

Do you realize how ridiculous putting “number of people using for search” and all of “world trade” in the same comparison is? Google’s 200-300 billion annual revenue is barely 1% of the US GDP.

For a size comparison, you would need to throw all of the FAANGs together, some energy companies, and some banks to reach the inflation adjusted market cap of the Dutch East India trading company: https://dutchreview.com/culture/history/how-rich-was-the-dut...
I don’t buy that explanation. Democracy turned out to be easily manipulatable with large sums of money and media control.

At this point, an average person can’t have much of an affect on how government is acting. Very few people can take a day off to protest, and even if they do, protests tend to be meaningless too.

I’m not saying that average person is blameless but most of the fault lies with the ruling classes.
I think that Twitter is very much the tail that wags the dog. Sure, 1 out of 50 normal people may use it, but nearly 1 out of 1 reporters use it. Those reporters often quote opinions on it as if they are representative of the larger public, even if the tweet they quote is by someone with 10 followers and no stars.
It's a very restrictive subsidy. The details (in French): https://www.service-public.fr/particuliers/actualites/A15906
So the solution is paying double so I can log out of my own account and into an account I created for my 2 year old so we can listen to a disney song? And when I want to listen to my own songs again then I have to log out of my kids account and back into my own?
The opengauss active and standby architecture is used with keeplive
Is there any risk in using opengauss active and standby architecture with keeplive?

Explanation: The use of the opengauss active/standby architecture with keeplive is mainly to consider that the application connection string does not need to be modified when the application uses the domain name (the domain name of the keeplive virtual IP) to connect and switch.

Is there a better architecture than this one for opengauss usage scenarios?
A step in the right direction. But why’s the subsidy only for electronic bikes and not also regular bicycles?
> At least SMS is a standard where as Google has their own proprietary [RCS] version.

AFAICT, the only thing "proprietary" about Google's RCS client implementation is E2EE: otherwise it's a fairly standard RCS client that can talk to any other RCS client.

I'd be happy if Apple did the same thing with iMessage (app): standard SMS/RCS client when sending to non-iMessage people, and 'fancy' client (blue bubbles) between iMesssage users.
Lossy compression isn’t linear.

If you play with JPEG quality you’ll see that the difference is barely perceptible for a while and then if you keep going down it becomes very noticeable.

So what does this look like with a general model?
Do you mean to StumbleUpon™ useful websites?
We need more such subsidies rather than subsidizing expensive luxury cars like Tesla.

Also why is this thread getting flagged?
Tell them to clarify what "during his work" means

Either during work hours or during work contract, enveloping all hours including weekends (unlikely).

If it's the latter, walk away.
It's tinfoil hat territory, but the connection could run the other way in principle: the ex-exec could have been shopping for someone to injure Twitter and cooked up a plot in which Twitter was an innocent victim and Musk a double-crossed coconspirator.

Why, it explains Musk's confidence that Twitter was up to something with its fake-account stats... It must be true!
>Without going into whatever context the original quote has: doch — encryption does both. There is no technology so pure it only helps the "good guys", from fire to firearms[0] there are things we can't possibly survive without, and yet criminals can use them for crimes.

So? Cars also help the bad guys escape from robberies faster, but we don't seem to ban those...

Not to mention knives... those can be deadly if somebody stubs you with one.

And what about clothes? Naked criminals would be much less effective...

The thing is anything can assist criminals. Why single out encryption (besides the government wanting to snoop at will)?
That might be a temporary technical issue, but I presume adults would just call each other and switch to Whatsapp so as to not make it a social issue like teens might by continuing to exclude someone.
Im starting to think social media might not be the best system to store my personal data, maintain our democracy and protect national security...
probably because regular bicycles are cheap already