skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I do not. I used to list my methods on a website but I prefer to have people research this topic themselves and fully understand it as their physiology and pre-existing conditions will differ from mine. What works for me may have negative side effects on others and I would prefer they take responsibility for the trial-and-error process they will have to go through. I've even stopped using the scientific method as it is just too slow given the complexity of all the systems in a mammal and how they interact with one another and I could not in good conscience promote that for others.
The built in gesture/hot corner thingy doesn’t work the same way. The built in method “shows your desktop” but doesn’t minimize all the open windows like Windows does.
Godaddy is the worst possible place to buy a domain. Use Cloud DNS or Route 53. You only have yourself to blame for using them. Their UI oozes scammy. People who shop there are simply naive. If they had the experience of buying a domain from a service that respects their users time and patience, they would never ever ever go back.
I take 250mg / day of NMN from NOVOS Labs (https://novoslabs.com/product/novos-boost/). I can't definitively say I feel the effects.

The site offers a nice write up on NMN: https://novoslabs.com/nicotinamide-mononucleotide-nmn-and-lo....
Looking at a touchscreen isn’t a big deal, people look down and around their cabin all the time while driving. People here sound like you have to be staring at the road without blinking to drive. In reality people are always looking around the cabin while driving for all sorts of reasons.
> I imagine many steakhouses don't strictly follow this
..
> I expect that even a rare steak ordered most places comes out medium rare at best

Your speculation does not even remotely match reality in the US, nor are you factually correct. The FDA recommends 145* for beef, it does not mandate it. And I've never been to a restaurant anywhere in the US that refused to serve a steak at 125 if so ordered.
Don't know too much about AI image generation, but wouldn't there be gatekeepers still needed to see if these images work for the desired purpose and are up to a certain quality? The final sign-off can only be given by a human, and this human necessarily has to be aesthetically intelligent and theoretically sound, very viable and desired skills.

From what I've seen so far, AI "art" sucks. And I'm not talking about fake/real. It's just crap, as far as my opinion is concerned.
My 2012 Prius has the most commonly used controls (sound system, temperature, answer a call) right on the steering wheel meaning they can be accessed without taking my eyes off the road. That's much safer than a touchscreen (it also has a small touchscreen but that doesn't have to be used nearly as much).
That already exists. In fact the Crunchy Data PostgreSQL playground loads a full Linux VM as part of how it works.

Take a look at this project: https://webvm.io/ - explained here: https://leaningtech.com/webvm-server-less-x86-virtual-machin...
> > “No touch screens” isn’t the optimal configuration

> [citation needed]

Yeah, citation isn't going to convince me. Touchscreens are still shit. Data can be tortured into submission depending on how and what metrics we look at. To be fully thorough is hard.
My understanding of this, and this is also something that is enforced at certain us state borders as well, is this is primarily about insect and other parasites that may be on/in the fruit (or their eggs). I remember having to toss a bunch of fruit at the california border a few years back.
Yes, I even added --purge to gain an extra notch in the process, but it all fell 37MB short in space. The next alternative is to shrink /home and expand /boot, but (2) I would have to do it via an USB booted Ubuntu, but (3) my SSD has LUKS, so I don't know how gparted would deal with it. I feel the risk of losing some data... I do have backups, but (4) not the time nor the patience to go through all this.
OP said nothing of the sort. All they did was list some (substantial) differences between the comparisons. They certainly might feel that way, but there's not enough in their post to conclude that.
Really the only problem here is the step-up cost-basis at death that you mention. This is indeed a big problem, and the fix is simple: Your heirs inherit your cost-basis as well (likely $0), so that when/if they sell it they have to pay taxes on the whole capital gain. We could also force the payments over some years, by increasing the cost basis and taxing on that amount. e.g. I inherit a property worth $1M and zero cost basis. After one year, I have to pay capital gains taxes on $100k, but my cost basis also goes up by $100k. Repeat each year up to $1M.

The other stuff (depreciation, 1031 exchange) are very sensible accounting. Depreciation applies only to the improvements (buildings) on the land, not the value of the land itself. This reflects genuine loss of value over time (buildings wear out). And in the event that you sell the property at a profit down the road, you have to pay back all that tax savings at higher regular income rates (not lower capital gains rates). This is called "depreciation recapture." So depreciation can defer taxes, but not eliminate them.

Likewise, when you do a 1031 exchange, your new property ends up with a lower cost basis based on the previous property, so that when you later sell it you still have to pay all that capital gains tax and depreciation recapture. It defers but does not reduce or eliminate taxes.

Of course - if you die while holding these properties, then your heirs get the cost basis reset ("stepped up"), which does indeed eliminate all these taxes. This is what we need to fix.
While I like the Mazda I own with physical buttons, it can get confusing for newer users to traverse the screen in Android auto. There's the spin knob, the click action and the up right down left rocking motion.

I know how to use this but most people I know prefer to start with the touch screen.
Food production takes a bit of time to ramp up. Epidemic diseases among livestock and plants can destroy months worth of production capability in a very short period of time.

Over-producing (and maintaining the capability to over-produce) is one means of protecting against such calamity. I'm not sure if there are better ways to go about it. True rural voters make up a relatively small percentage of the country's population- 20% or so, depending on where you draw the line. It's not hard to out-vote them, but it is very hard to live without them.
Condo model ownership is very common in dense urban areas. You "own" your apartment, and pay an association to manage the repairs and upkeep of the common building and amenities.

That said, renting in the short term is still something people will want to do. Some people will even want to do it longer term, if they want no responsibilities at all for repair and upkeep or freedom to leave with no strings attached at the end of the lease.
Me: Who exactly has to borrow and how much? Well, that's complicated and depends on many different factors.

You: You are making it out as if its only either poor or rich get a free ride.

Me: No.

You can willfully misinterpret me, despite my own clarifications, but this goes against the HN guidelines. It should be needless to say, but kids don't have to borrow for college if their parents pay for it, right? So it's very dependent on a kid's family. This seems indisputable. I'm not trying to say anything surprising here, just the obvious.

I'm done replying to you now. This conversation is not interesting and is going nowhere fast.
My understanding is that Bologna is a bit like hotdogs, pretty much made out of whatever left over scraps they can find.
Type checking gets wonky in the REPL world, since things are changing a lot. During JIT usage (i.e. REPL usage or running a program right from source), type checking happens for each new form, taking into account what it knows of the types so far. In this context, some things, such as redefining vars, don't retroactively type check all previous usages of the var. So that sort of analysis is disabled.

During AOT compilation, though, jank does whole program analysis and uses the type information to box/unbox, monomorphize, compute at compile-time, etc. I'll be publishing documentation on each of these designs (the type system, the JIT, the interop support) on the website as things move forward. Stay tuned. :)
You know whom to thank for the camera stack actually existing.

Unpaid FOSS developers owe you absolutely nothing. This kind of self-entitled behavior and snarky comments are some of the major reasons why unpaid devs burn out and stop contributing.

Don't be one of the people to blame for developer exodus away from FOSS.
To quote the late Norm MacDonald from a Saturday Night Live "Weekend Update" segment:

> A new study says that people who quit smoking have healthier lungs. Yet another groundbreaking story from the pages of the medical journal "DUH".
Here's my similar project, which uses Python and SQLite compiled to WebAssembly in the browser so that it can run my Datasette server-side application entirely client-side:

https://lite.datasette.io/

More about that project here: https://simonwillison.net/series/datasette-lite/

I just added support for installing additional plugins written in Python this morning: https://simonwillison.net/2022/Aug/17/datasette-lite-plugins...
> This exactly. Start with parking lots that hold say >100 cars. A business with that much need for customer parking can likely bare this cost,

Say goodbye to all rural farmers markets.
SSD can get to really low power levels, depending on state. Does not mean they were all in power sipping 10mW mode during measurement.

> just get basically any Intel system with an IGP since 4th gen (Haswell). Avoid Ryzen CPU with dGPU

Was your advice to me. So I took it at face value and compared them, like you suggested, to the relevant models.
How is President cheese available in every major US supermarket then? Pasteurized?
Please elaborate on why that is
For price discovery? Maybe.

But it's certainly not for the other participants who are getting rolled over by insiders. Why play a rigged game?

And it's definitely not beneficial when the insider has the active ability to influence the price of the asset. If an executive could make money by shorting his firm's stock, the optimal strategy for every executive would be to sabotage their firm, while shorting its stock.

The latter two reasons are why it's illegal, by the way. It undermines confidence in markets, and it creates perverse, value-destroying incentives.
Indeed that's been a huge problem to date. Here's hoping they've made actual progress: "The robust process is tolerant to contaminants in the feed. This means easier pretreatment of the feed before the Olefy processing." (from the bullet points about halfway through the article)
Plugin Support for Datasette Lite (Datasette in the Browser with WebAssembly)
Not uncommon for parents to buy a house for their kid to live in, rent it to a few roommates to cover the mortgage, then keep it as an investment or sell for a profit when the kid graduates.
That's a good point. I'll probably do that and add it to the site!
For me the word cryptocurrency and scam are synonyms. And in my mind people defending it on the internet are inside the pyramid scheme and trying to justify their investment.

Just one of the many cancers affecting our current society.
I do. Along with Apigenin, and a few other new molecules.

Sublingual.
"so credits to each do indeed have the opposite effect with respect to a balance sheet"

I think what you mean here is that a debit balance in an asset account is presented as a positive amount, whereas a debit balance in a liability account would show as a negative amount.

This is true, but that doesn't mean a credit has the opposite effect depending on whether it's applied to an asset or liability account. Consider that you have two different accounts with your bank:

- a current account (usually the bank owes you money, i.e. usually a credit balance from the bank's POV)

- a loan account (you bought a car on credit, and owe the bank money, i.e. a debit balance from bank's POV)

For the bank, the current account is a liability ($1,000) and the loan account is an asset ($25,000).

When you deliver a bag containing $5,000 to the bank, the bank will credit one of these two accounts. They'll either increase the current account to $6,000, or decrease the loan account to $19,000.

In either case, the credit has the same effect: your net debt to the bank is decreased by $5k.
I thought it was that new cars had long lead times attached to them. Was that not the case?
Exactly. AWS never promises every product in every DC. If you build on it before it's available in a region you need it in, it's a choice and risk you are making
We do not need to hand over ownership to the government to build more houses. Just simplify zoning laws. Private landlords want to build. People want to maximize the value of their properties. They can't because of zoning laws that favor single family home hellscapes.
But this only works as long as the property's price is depreciating. Don't property prices generally trend up over time?
no ideas who this fella is and too lazy to look up his huge achievements. but I dislike the way he is thinking. I mean - it's already there. go and research Smalltalk stuff or something.
If 123 and "123" were the same thing, then 123 + 123 must be equivalent to "123" + "123", and 123 + "123" cannot be made a runtime error. And I do think PHP (the poster child for weak typing, second to Bash) uses a separate . operator for string concatenation (rather than +), and relies on I think -> for object field access.
> Yes, but at least greenbacks are backed by real stuff.

Fiat currencies are not “backed”, you have nothing they are even theoretically guaranteed to be exchangeable for, at a fixed rate of currency to commodity, setting a value floor, at least relative to the commodity.

They are, instead, actively managed.

The theory is that this is better, at least for large, geopolitically and economically powerful, countries as issuers, because backing commodities themselves are only at best a limited fit for the (even as a value basis) desirable features of currency, and have somewhat random performance at any given time compared to that “at best”, and active management (which is also not perfect!) seems to be able to do better, if the manager governs a big and powerful enough market to start with.
People gave me so much grief before the pandemic for working from home all the time. Not a soul has said anything to the extent "Oh that must be nice" since.

Working from home has downsides that people refused to understand before they experienced it for themselves.

Still better than a freaking "Open" office. I don't get deafened by HVAC noise at home, or have to pretend to be able to focus while two managers with nothing better to do blabber on about non-work things right next to my desk. And then those self same managers will have the gall to critique my work ethic.
I've been using Macs since 1984 and I almost never minimize a window. I find that I generally don't need to since I can maximize a window properly. In macOS the Maximize function (which you need to use option to get from the green button) makes the window the largest size that makes sense for the content and fits on the screen. On Windows, the maximize button in MDI windows makes the window essentially full-screen which I personally never want. I can have multiple maximized windows on macOS and access them all by either just clicking between them or using Cmd-`. I have no need to minimize unless a window's maximized size is essentially full-screen.
Vacancy rates are low, investors don't just sit on the units.
On the contrary, leaving so many apps open can make my machine feel like it's "dragging" when I really push it, mostly because I have software open that I'm not using. Especially on Macs, where memory comes at an extreme premium, I find myself frequently frustrated by the number of applications I have open. This also happens on Windows with tray-minimized apps, but to a much lesser extent.

In either case, I find both implementations sloppy. Apple's solution is complete but redundant, and Windows' solution is simple but lacking. I have to give it to KDE and GNOME, both desktops manage to 'fix' this problem by encouraging people to minimize apps they aren't using. Your (X) icon still has the magic power to kill processes, and you get to keep your precious applications when you're done using them. Boom, no need for ultra-complex Application/Window/Form/Dialog hierarchy for the user to wrap their mind around. Simple solution to a simple problem.
[I retract this comment entirely, apart from the pleasantries and the preference of being wrong—see downthread where rewq4321 corrects me.]

Heh, didn’t notice the username match there!

I don’t think “rough edges” is the right characterisation. What OPFS provides is just nothing in the direction required. The kind of file system you need to build a database on is a fundamentally completely different beast, with only unimportant surface-level similarities. It would generally require a complete replacement of the backend, with quite possibly literally no code in common.

I’d like something like this, because it’s certainly genuinely useful for cases like this, but I’d honestly be surprised if it ever happens, because it’s just… not webby. To be useful, it just about requires that the whole thing be backed by an actual file system and exposing that, which is something that has been assiduously avoided so far in the design, probably in significant part because it discloses quite a lot about the host system (fingerprinting; disk performance characteristics, quite possibly even file system identification by various nuances in behaviour; and surprisingly large side-channel attack possibilities, mildly similar to the fuss over high-resolution timers), but also because it tends to be a security hazard, just another moving part where things can go wrong more easily than you imagine.

I strongly suspect it will end up a bit like Web SQL: a nice idea that pretty much everyone agrees is a nice idea, but which is also a non-starter for other reasons.

But I wouldn’t mind being wrong. I do want to be able to deploy a robust, high-performing SQLite in the browser.
This is part of a comment I made on The State of State Machines (2021) [1] which is a Google Project Zero post about how complex state machines were exploited.

> I feel like we will continue to run into these kinds of issues to the end of time unless can figure out: 1. How to precisely describe the properties we want the final system to have, 2. How to 'compile' from a higher-level language/layer into a lower-level language while maintaining all those properties. At the least this will require us to: 3. Define the precise semantics of each layer and enforce that every construction in and implementation of that layer adheres to it strictly.

> Layers/languages should verifiably maintain these properties through every translation via paths like: eula/privacy policy, requirements, UX, UI, state machine, source code, AST, IR, ASM, machine code. Every one of these layers should have a well-defined execution model that is isomorphic with other layers, modulo metadata. For example: source code === AST [+ comment/whitespace/filesystem metadata], AST === IR [+ name/desugaring/applied-optimizations metadata]. All undefined behavior at every layer must be exterminated by definition or avoided by construction.

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25836398#25838252
If this is how it works, then I don't think they'd burn a tag. People will inevitably do a partial fill or maybe even just open it up to see how it works. And if there are multiple tags, which one does it burn?

The bottles also do not appear to be one time use.
It's all about protecting big business. Hence why all kinds of dubious ingredients are allowed in fast food, but farmers get busted for selling raw milk.
What you're asking for doesn't currently exist. At least not any proven ones. There's a dozen new philosophical interpretations of quantum mechanics every year but they usually make no new predictions, so there is no way to test if the interpretation is correct.

Most (all?*) interpretations only differ in defining the "wavefunction collapse" and what happens before it. But since measuring anything involves collapsing the wavefunction, it's impossible to measure what happens before that.

We do know, from real-world experiments, that particles cannot actually be moving point-like objects. The most famous example is the double slit experiment where a single particle can cause wavelike interference with itself.

But also we know it isn't exactly a classical wave. We can only measure it as a single point, and it arrives in discrete events, not a continuous transfer of energy like a wave.

So "wavefunction" and the rest of QM lingo is what we have. We don't fully know what those are, but we also know that being just a point or wave in the style of classical physics cannot be correct.

* If an interpretation does make a new prediction that is measurable, I'm not sure if it's considered just an interpretation anymore.
IMVHO (and personal experience) a certain level of density is needed, just because even if traveling is cheap it's not as cheap as such and we are social animals needing each others BUT more than a certain level of density issues surpass much the proximity needs.

Honestly my take is that we need Rivieras witch means a bit dense BUT not more than a bit suburbs that are NOT only residential but mixed. As a result we can have "near enough" services/people without failing in the density trap.

The big issue is that human settlements never worked well when centrally planned and when they are not if they work more people want to be there, so the initial low density became right and than too much dense. After that density issue start to bite, people to flee and the cycle restart. No recipe to fix it, it's more a social issue than a mere architectural one.

Some, like McKinsey think we can solve some complexity issue with flying vehicles and I agree, but I do not think we are as near as they state https://www.easa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/dfu/uam-full-... and we still have an enormous isse: making VTOLs/STOLs it's relatively easy (behind the BEV part) but they can just move people and little volume/weigh goods so we can't build a home moving raw materials without roads and if we need them we need to build and maintain them...

Keep following the "in medio stat virtus" principle about the density and diversity described above I think we also need to came back to a moderately distributed economy: some activities need big factories, so far we can't do anything different, BUT only some. Many others can be done in smaller settlements witch for instance that instead of build mega-factories for anything we should try to achieve economy of scale with standards and standard tools in many smaller factories. Easy to say, hard to built but... In the end internet was a free scale network of networks and prove to scale well enough. I think the same principle can be generally valid. The VERY COMPLEX and very expensive game is try it in the real word because social experiments can't be done and destroy as software projects. They demand very long time just to build them. Enormous resources etc and simulations can't really help more than a bit. Since in the past we have build many-centuries longs projects I think we can achieve such result anyway, but not in the modern mind settlement of something quick and done. Convincing people to embrace such revolution and remain engaged for few decades is however... Well... In the past we used religion to push people to such efforts...
You would be surprised how much Haskell is practical for boring stuff, try it out http://learnyouahaskell.com/