skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Hey, its my first comment on Hacker News.

This won't help in terms of clarity of how good the transistor is. As others mentioned, there are different kinds of transistors and different manufactures would still use their smallest (read not necessarily the fastest/strongest/mostly used) to market their process.

A major reason I think this won't work is that transistor size no-longer limits the density of the chip. Nodes below 20nm have transistor contacts (what connects the silicon to metal), and metal tracks that are much larger than the transistor. The contacts typically limit the pitch between transistors and hence the density. A lot of innovation is now done to shrink those elements rather than work on the transistor physics/materials/size directly.
Uhm maybe to generate narratives procedurally, for a video game for example? Like what is done for level design in roguelikes
Good for New Zealand, seriously. This guy wants to influence U.S. politics and society in a highly negative way, and yet, tries to build his little getaway bunker in New Zealand after force buying citizenship there. Although, they should have denied his and Larry Page's citizenships.
Two reasons:

1. In general, new programs, and updates to extending programs, tend not to get committed without the requisite manual pages or related manual page updates.

2. "Bugs" in OpenBSD's manual pages are treated no differently than bugs in other areas of the source tree. Find a problem in a manual page? Submit a diff file for it and it'll get reviewed and committed.
Me too but let’s play devils advocate here.

1) you likely aren’t going to get the job without some absurd degree of unit testing

2) most of your code should be pure functions making them trivial to unit test

3) writing pure functions and making your code testable makes your system less coupled which is a good thing

4) designing the tests is designing the software which is often helpful

That’s it I don’t have a fifth point. Actually I do, writing software is a form of art and it cannot be summed up as simply as unit testing everything always bad or always good. There might be somethings like converting an engine performance simulation to Golang from Excel that might be fantastic to unit test the shit out of, testing if onPress works on your button component is basically pointless.
Stop Buying Stuff – TEDx Talk by Niko Stoifberg
I think simulation is, as the name implies, to simulate the behavior of something. For example, games like Gran Turismo and Assetto Corza are simulators because they implement the logic so the cars behave as close as real life as they can.

On the other hand, emulation is about implementing the behavior of a hardware or device via software. For example a console emulator implements the logic so the API calls made by the game are interpreted by the emulator and tries to execute as if the game was communicating with the real hardware (CPU, Memory, etc).
The philosophical movement you're looking for is called MetaModernism, or PostPostModernism.

Its specifically about creating a philosophical framework for how to decide what has meaning in our lives. Its about giving people the tools to decide what should fill that gap.

Stoicism is one option, that already suggests answers to that question.
I would guess they diverted out of:

- respect for the dead: a person has just passed on. Many people want at least the illusion of deceased people being at rest, and would think it's undignified to bring the body all the way to the destination when it could be allowed to be taken off and "rest".

and

- the comfort of surrounding passengers: there's not a lot of free space on a passenger plane. I don't know if there are any procedures for moving a body to someplace more convenient to the other passengers, but doing so would kind of fly in the face of the previous point.
The FSF is selling them[1], but it's just a printout of the same content as you get with the Texinfo pages.

[1] https://shop.fsf.org/collection/books-docs
> If you don't know what you want to accomplish, what are you writing code for?

Often times you write to find what you want to accomplish. It sounds backwards, perhaps it is backwards, but it's also very human. Without something to show the user, they often have no idea what they want. In fact, people are far better at telling you what's wrong with what's presented to them then enumerating everything they want ahead of time.

TDD is great but also completely useless for sussing requirements out of users.
A Third-Party SMS Service Was Used to Take over Signal Accounts
Female dolphins have a working clitoris, so they probably enjoy sex
Newsom's office criticizes response to Oakland encampment
No need to go to the 3rd world - there are plenty of places where eating raw lettuce is a bad idea. I went to a lecture once that went into detail on the lengths that the USA goes to to ensure our lettuce is safe to eat. The conclusion was that stuck with me was that the first time your lettuce leaves refrigeration is on the drive home, the speaker suggested that you bring a cooler in the trunk of your car to ensure proper cold chain management for leafy green purchases.

You can see some of the considerations in "Commodity Specific Food Safety
Guidelines for the Lettuce and
Leafy Greens Supply Chain" [1]

[1] https://www.fda.gov/files/food/published/Commodity-Specific-...
This is extremely tangential and speculative, but I've always thought ancient practices of sacrifice served as slop, or a safety margin.

When times are lean, you can leave a little less food for the gods and do a little more praying.
I don’t. Never once seen TDD help more than it was a time sink. On the other hand writing lots of tests is great, but no need for TDD.
I don't really care about his allegations. Innocent until proven guilty.

I care more about the way he runs his company:

- Minimum salary is $80k

- Unlimited time off

- Doesn't lay off people

My skeptical game theory hat tells me this is not sustainable, not scalable and not applicable to every company out there.

Even if it is, it won't be long before market forces and human stupidity, laziness and greed (both the employee and employer) force it back to equilibrium.
A Tool That Monitors How Long Kids Are in the Bathroom Is Now in 1K US Schools
My gut feeling (pun intended) is that the manure theory makes sense and lower ranked monks were just more likely to rotate across all tasks needed in the friary, as opposed to peasants who specialised in a single activity (farmer, carpenter, quest NPCs, etc)
May be dignity is inside and not outside. Does it matter what others feel about us.
Huh! Fair enough.
Desiderata by Max Ehrmann
Following on from the recent link for "Sunscreen"

In my experience surprisingly few people are familiar with it.
Note if you want a very similar sized machine which has significant processing power then the One Mix Yoga 2S is the only non-Atom, non-eMMC 7" laptop. It's essentially a same-year Macbook Air folded in half on both axis.
You might be embroiled in all the hype, but it's possible to just download an app and invest in some crypto. Lots of people will have just done that.
Neurological and psychiatric risk trajectories after SARS-CoV-2 infection
You’re probably stopping the seasoning from building up, and making it more sticky. Hot water and a soft nylon brush should be enough for 90% of your cooking, the occasional sticky burger just needs a 5m hot water bath to let go.
Gravity Payments CEO Dan Price resigns
> A major reason I think this won't work is that transistor size no-longer limits the density of the chip. Nodes below 20nm have transistor contacts (what connects the silicon to metal), and metal tracks that are much larger than the transistor. The contacts typically limit the pitch between transistors and hence the density. A lot of innovation is now done to shrink those elements rather than work on the transistor physics/materials/size directly.

Layman question from not GP, but wouldn't reducing the "overhead" around transistors increase the transistors-per-area metric and thus be at least somewhat useful?
Amazon Complains FTC Is Harassing Top Executives, Bezos During Investigation
Kudos for the "quest NPCs" joke.
Well I would call that greed. I do think a short list of factors is possible, and greed often preys on ignorance.
I think I’d prefer my M1 iPad Pro with keyboard cover and an ssh client (it’s also super portable and comes in my bag everywhere with me), even though it is missing an escape key and costs a small fortune, because I’m a slut for dpi and fps.

I have to do my programming remotely, but blink is f/oss and supports mosh.

It also has a secure enclave for keys which is not that common on laptops (and why all of mine have to have Yubikey nanos living permanently in one of their ports).
I mean it’s true that wilderness is under attack more in poorer countries (they didn’t so thoroughly deforest themselves in the first place after all). But they’re not using traditional, let alone organic, methods.
This exact theory has been put forward by scientists a few times - that variation in sleep-wake times helps guard a tribe or camp at night.

A 2017 study of an indigenous hunter-gatherer group found that there was virtually always at least one person awake in the group, around the clock. The longest contiguous time the whole group was asleep simultaneously was just 1 minute! Here's one article about it: https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/chronotypes-ev...
Which would allow me to install my own custom firmware? Is that the "security" issue?
> And to continue to place stones even when you no longer know why the reason why.

OT, but I always enjoy that kind of typos that offer us a glimpse into the editorial process.

Usually editing is cutting, so it's likely that the first version was "even when you no longer know the reason why", that was then changed to "even when you no longer know why" (which I think is better).

But if the editor (or the author) had simply deleted "the reason" then there would be no typo (either the deletion would have worked or it wouldn't, but in both cases there would be only one instance of 'why').

So I gather the editor added the 'why' before 'the', and then intended to delete the rest of the sentence, but for some reason that didn't happen.
Scan for cybersecurity risks on every commit with CodeSec and Git Hooks for free
> Please point to the "boon".

Sure. I said:

> It's a boon to anyone whose job was created by it as well

You then say:

> If you mean people got to keep their jobs = boon

No, I said the job in the first place is funded by investment. I couldn't have made it clearer.

If investors don't invest in your startup/scaleup then there is no job in the first place. Nothing about being grateful for keeping your job.

> The problem is, wealth was transferred upstream, en masse, and not taxed anywhere near labor.

You're thinking in terms of groups instead of individuals, and that the groups are static. You shouldn't (as it will lead to so many broken ways of thinking) and they aren't.

> Here is some data that solidly debunks your disguised claim of "trickle down"

It's not trickle down - I only go for nonpolitical theories, and the US left wing's labels to oversimplify and demonise some fairly standard economics doesn't hold up by that measure.

I'd rather you replied to what I said than straw man it. You will mislead casual readers by doing so.
Awesome - thank you for the comprehensive response. Best of luck to you and the project.
There are quantitative studies showing that TDD has little to no impact development time or code quality[0]. What has been found, however, is that writing code in short increments helps a lot (something that can be caused by using TDD).

For more information on studies covering the topic (and much more), I highly recommend watching Greg Wilson's Software Engineering's Greatest Hits[1].

[0]: https://neverworkintheory.org/2016/10/05/test-driven-develop...
[1]: https://youtu.be/HrVtA-ue-x0?t=448
Oh boy, you're in for a wild ride.

I had my kid at my forties.

TL;DR: you're always exhausted, since getting up in the morning, which you shouldn't, until early in the night - something I lack the grasp to understand, despite being more or less fit and not sedentary.

I guess it's the body starting to giving up on you somehow.
Even organic agriculture isn’t like it used to be - organic farmers use machines and technology just like all others.
Cool! I’d love to hear more about the node design process, it seems as though presumably the blocks of transistors are already combined into chip Lego and each of these uses interference patterns to etch things that are smaller than would be possible otherwise? We must be hitting the theoretical limit in a few generations right?
Hey, you are right. I thought about that right after I posted my comment but the devil is in the details.

As you shrink the contacts and the metals their resistance and capacitance exponentially increase. This means that both your power will go up and your speeds will go down. Also the process becomes more prone to manufacturing errors. So shrinking those elements blindly without innovation just to increase the density numbers is not really a good metric of the quality of the process.
I suspect you meant "the PF" not the PIC (where PF equals 'pilot flying').
For a tech company in Seattle, $80k is not exactly great pay.
FWIW the community doesn't take itself particularly seriously, at least not the "metal" part.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkdkZN1rduo
It all sounds great in terms of a format. But if it is so superior, how come even on the GNU “home turf” we are still mainly using man pages in 2022? Is it not a classic example of “worse is better”? Where man may have major obvious flaws, but it is simply just good and standardised enough so that texinfo simply can not displace it despite its advantages.
The difference this time is that there are quite a number of blockchains who are very non-transparently attempting to become rent seekers.

There's a chance for someone to earn $x per ID card or verifiable credential issued; you're essentially becoming a TLD operator only with something 95% of the population of developed countries will use.
Closing a portable PC with a pen inside was the leading cause of accident. I don’t know if it is anymore, since there is generally no deep trench at the top of flat-keys keyboards, like there were on deep-keys keyboards.
The demo map crashed my iPhone in the weirdest way. After zooming in and out a bit, the screen went dark, then fully pink, then it restarted.
REST is not a strict specification and it's not a single implementation, you can just start doing it.

That said, I wouldn't recommend going the allow everything flexible resolver way like GraphQL: it's terrible for performance (eg. most APIs use N+1 queries unless you have something like https://github.com/join-monster/join-monster), the complexity of the codebase skyrockets and having to specify all the fields you want is not exactly ergonomic in most situations.
Wait for MacRumors to pick this up as a leak.
Here's a picture from my house right now with a view of where Thiel is proposing development vs. where development is actually happening

https://imgur.com/a/pwxIOEn
It's still CS50 - great teaching, super accessible, starts from scratch, doesn't dumb things down - highly recommend for complete beginners.
> Now your code is easier to refactor

Unless you need to change the design of the interface in any way -- then it's harder. Tests lock a particular interface in place -- which is great if you have a well defined interface. But if you're trying to figure out that interface then you've prematurely locked yourself in.
A shame that it spies on you. It had so much potential.
Assuming the point is mostly nitrates and minerals, I don’t think they would be would be much affected, though the aggregation properties of the manure may be?

On the other hand, combustion could also help with destroying the antibiotics found in the manure, which spread to the soil and accumulate in produce.
Remember back in the 70s when there was panic over overpopulation? I feel like we'll actually be running out of water before then (thanks climate change) but if that hadn't happened, it would have been running out of food. Once we reach "peak optimal food production", our population will eventually outstrip food reserves. We would have to start culling people or we'd starve.

On an unrelated note, the Overpopulation wikipedia page is interesting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overpopulation
Thank you for this! Just a question, have you been using the same model as the OP - GPD Micro PC?
Yep, my phone too. I'm on a pixel 6.
The 4004 only has 2300 transistors, not 134k.
It's odd how much time software engineers will spend on discussing the same old boring stuff like TDD. There are a thousand flowers blooming in cryptography, ML/AI, cryptocurrencies etc. Yet here we are with yet another rehash of the same discussion
They didn't say, so my assumption is that is indeed something like that.
Explained: Noopener, noreferrer, and nofollow Values (2019)
Friend of mine says when he has code he doesn't want over eager jr dev's 'refactoring' he writes a couple of Byzantine unit tests to guard it.
Emulator: make a CPU architecture run (exactly) on a different one. Example: x86 on M1. See also QEMU https://www.qemu.org/

Simulator: run (approximately) a physical system on a computer. Example: weather forecasts.

As always in practice close words are used interchangeably.
You're writing as if this is just analytics tracking a user's actions in their own UI. It's not! This is tracking actions users take, and data users enter, on 3rd-party websites.

That is not "what happens in Tiktok's app," as you put it in your reply. It may be hosted "in" the app in a technical sense, but the typical user who is fullscreen viewing a totally different website may not feel like they are "in" the app at all. I wouldn't bet that most users even get that there's a distinction between an in-app browser vs. opening a tab in the main OS browser (on Android at least, the back gesture takes you back to the app either way). Users almost certainly doesn't expect the original app to be able to read passwords and other text that they type on those 3rd-party sites.
http://aip.dev describes Google's approach to this.
What about /blogs/:id?organization=:id, doesn’t it solve the issue?
a change in the scheduled stops (intentionally) would be a reroute or flagstop; a diversion is when you aren't planning to stop somewhere else but have to, because reasons.

analogies:

flagstop : on the way to Walmart you decide to stop at CVS on the way for something you remembered.

diversion: on the way to Walmart you start to loose bowel control and pull into the nearest Burger King to use their w/c.

HTH
This would be my recommendation, especially if you use UUIDs or some other long string as identifiers
Kristin is a person too, with her own achievements. This reduction based on identity is really not productive.
yes, good point, USB tethering would probably save power.

The "feature phones" I have in mind, don't run Android. For example these ones https://www.nokia.com/phones/en_int/feature-phones

some of those may have USB tethering nonetheless
Selling rune long 32k - k man 20
I‘m not sure if the benefit of exclusive licensing in music streaming is as big as it is in video streaming.

The portfolio available on Spotify (and any other streaming service) is so huge, even if one major artist is missing, you’re still pretty much guaranteed to find something you enjoy.

This is purely anecdotal, but looking at me and many of my peers: many people don’t even have a favorite artist anymore. At least no artist they care enough about to switch streaming platforms for.
I've also been following Kysely and am a big fan, having used Objection.js and Knex a lot in the past. I consider Kysely to be the TypeScript-native spiritual successor to Knex.

For a theoretical new Node + TypeScript + SQL project, the three options I would consider are, from most-ORMy to least:

- Prisma

- Kysely + kysely-codegen (query builder)

- slonik + @slonik/typegen (raw postgres driver with good types; not sure if there's a good MySQL equivalent)
> Why would I ask them? They would never admit to it being a 'shoot first ask question later' play. They would never admit to it being FOMO. They would never admit to it being something they were afraid they'd get left behind on and once they realized it wasn't relevant to their business, sunk cost fallacy took over. They'd never admit to anything that made them look bad.

Is this what you say when someone brings up a refutation towards an absolutist statement about "AML chains" and standards compliance with the current system? Why not confirm your suspicions by asking them directly [0] rather than making more excuses, unless as I always expect from many absolutist critics of crypto especially on this site, that they are all talk and no action; which that is so easy, anyone can do that.

> Again, ISO 20022 is completely irrelevant to this conversation. I've genuinely no idea how this became a talking point.

The reality is and with the many years of these cryptocurrency technologies and projects existing is that only a few of them will survive and as I have mentioned already a few will stand the test of time to be serious enough for companies like Stripe and Moneygram to choose and use projects like Stellar, and those that are compliant with the current system; be it the ISO 20020 messaging standard and have AML compliance, etc will be around for a very long time. So in fact, it is totally relevant to this discussion.

> Again, this has nothing to do with AML compliance which I'm confident each of those companies do - and we know full well that Tornado did not.

Non-compliant projects that enable complete or total obfuscation like Tornado Cash, Monero, etc or any other projects that angers the regulators won't survive and will be targeted and made difficult to use. That also explains why MoneyGram ruled out the privacy coins and chose Stellar for their product. No need to ask them about that.

> Again, there's no reason to think that there won't be any future regulatory action simply because there has not yet been any and I personally doubt any amount of appealing to authority will help.

Now who exactly said that there won't be any 'future regulatory action'?

Given that the SEC is continuously cracking down and enforcing their regulations on many crypto projects this year and with other places like the UK, EU countries following up with their own rules, its clear that the privacy coins, tools, etc are the first to be clamped down since they are already incompatible with KYC, AML checks; hence the importance of waiting for regulatory clarity by the authorities which is exactly what I said in the first place had you read my comment.

Sounds like you are ranting in denial. It's not too late to stop them and get them to admit your suspicions of them in 'FOMO', or 'being something they were afraid they'd get left behind on' or 'being attached to sunk cost fallacy' yourself then: [0] plenty of time.

[0] https://www.crowdcast.io/e/techstars-payments-3/register
Well, if one really wants to taste the subtle tastes of an egg, cooking sans oil does that.

By subtle, I mean similar to the difference between veggie oil and olive or canola oil. These all have a distinct taste to me, and I dislike canola enough to notice when it's been used.

The egg by itself has flavors that get dominated by the oil flavors.

To some people it matters. Simple as that.
A lot of the farmland in and around where my grandfather grew up has been unused for decades now - 100 years ago a family could farm it and made enough money to live off. Now it's either not economical to work it like they did 100 years ago or it's not economical to buy the right equipment etc to do it the modern way.