skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
What is done is done. Even if some piece of legislation were to come out tomorrow all the older devices would still be completely closed off. Would we have to collectively just push to move to the new open-by-default devices or should we persist in reverse engineering the older stuff?
Using APIs to help drive innovation in the global consumer travel industry
How come? It gives modern context to the amount lost, in the currency that country now uses. Surely as long as you follow the conversion rates between currencies when they changed, then it's possible to provide an approximate current value in a relatable currency. The confusing bit for me is "equivalent to £5.45 million in 2019" as it is not clear why it would be a value in £, being in Euro using Ireland (and pedantically if it means Irish or British pounds).
Terraform Labs was based in Seoul. The name of the company was not "Terraluna".

I'm uncertain what Silicon Valley has to do with Terraform Labs, WeWork, nor Gravity Payments given that neither of these companies were based in the valley.

If you are attempting to make a jab at Silicon Valley, it doesn't seem to be landing.
Unless we are talking about any kind of GUI.
probably due to clicking or chirping noise caused by old/rusty/faulty wires
It didnt quit because of his salary, this is clickbait
Be careful with such a small keyboard. Taking notes in multi hour lectures with an Apple Newton keyboard gave me permanent RSI 20 years ago that I still have today.
not for long. Once the dependency on oil is gone, the entire gulf is obsolete
While I do vehemently disagree with the authors position on guns, he raises some exceptional points I think most people don't get and are fundamental to breaking down the divisions we're seeing today.

"This kind of oversimplification of things encourages an “us vs. them” mindset"

"or is this actually an insane amount of posturing, it’s impossible for me to tell"

"I’m a walking bias. We all are"
> The web needs to be able to try things, and discard them when they are not used.

Chrome using their browser-adoption super majority to force standards change. This is monopolistic behavior I'd say, and I'd be glad to see it stop.
I've also thought about that. At first N seemed daunting, but then I added in a bit of the drake equation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drake_equation) style thinking.

Humanity has 33 bits of entropy. So with 33 pieces of information about a person that don't depend on each other can very likely uniquely identify any person. Individually a person is likely to meet 10000 different people in their life, that's 14 bits of entropy if you start there.

Male/Female, College educated/not, looks, substance use, desire for children, compatible hobbies, compatible diets, compatible cultures, compatible monetary beliefs, compatible sexual preferences, my own level of attractiveness. Each hard preference has a corresponding reduction in dating pool size.

Clearly I am also single.
It seems like webhooks have enough corner cases for the sender to require a specialized tool to protect itself from malicious users and to stay performant.

Does anyone have suggestion for such tools/services that they might have used in production?
You’ve got to have insane amounts of self confidence to do what he’s done if that’s ego inject into my veins please.
Can we therefore make the same assumption about female humans?
I also drink a lot of alcohol with my meals, but I find that often Japanese people who eat with me refrain from ordering alcohol because the next day is a work day - so Fridays will be a day that everyone orders alcohol for example. I have also been in the accompany of plenty of Japanese who get "Asian flush" and a worried about any effect on their health.

In comparison Koreans will nearly always drink alcohol on a daily basis and to a stronger concentration than what Japanese drink - even the Koreans in Japan.
You're probably right, besides aesthetic value, writing on paper has little utility left
Hire a Node JS Developer from one of the top Node JS development company. We offer cost-effective solutions for custom Node JS development services on-time.
> "traditional", "organic"

Traditional is a bit weird with agriculture, techniques like crop rotation have been around since 6000 BC. There are so many ancient improvements third world countries may not even use.
I'm just curious, there are plenty of 3rd party full-featured browsers based on WKWebView that are injecting tons of JavaScript into all pages and basically doing the same as in-app browsers. So what's the difference?
I read the parent comment as citing the claim that quantum entanglement would explicitly manifest.
> I’m pretty sure someone on the British show Come Dine With Me had one of these and called themselves a Lady, and everyone thought she was legit. Madness.

Or everyone pretended to, for the sake of the episode. Possibly sa a bit of a gag.
> Is there a good book for people without a compsci background to better understand terms?

This isn't going to solve your immediate problem, but the trick is to build your own compsci background. Data Structures, Algo, Operating Systems, Discrete Math, etc. courses are all available online various platforms (youtube has a lot of the lectures). I went through lectures and problems from Cornell, Stanford, CMU and MIT online for free. It is gonna take some time, but I suggest starting to chip away at the lectures. It's a nice break from actively hacking on something.
Probably bulshit
I like to think so, but I sure detest the fake humble people, who deny that they know anything. This whole "I know nothing, like, not even that 1+1=2" kind of attitude or this borderline "the universe is holy and I must be in awe of it because it makes me sound deep and that I am humble, when really this is all a show to make others think that I'm intellectually humbler than they are."

I don't know if that makes sense to anyone else, but I just think there's a lot of overweening fake humbleness going on. "Oh, the universe is so big, how can we be so arrogant that we think we know everything, the universe is a wonderous place and we are so small and limited, and blah, blah, blah." Yeah, I get it already. Heard it the first million times how wonderous you think the universe is and how loudly and strenuously you proclaim to know nothing because you heard it is cool to say that you don't know nothing about nothing.

It's like humble bragging, but humble humbling.

I mean, we know that the entire universe's matter is made up of the periodic table through spectroscopy (not counting dark matter, just "regular" matter). It's not like there's going to be whisky atoms or pizza atoms so that there's just a lake of whisky somewhere. You are not going to be able to have animals made of Xenon or Argon or Neon or any of the other noble inert gases.

I think there is a lot of shit to learn and it is fun and interesting and I love it. But there's no reason to act with such fake reverence and like it is a holy universe. It's just flucking stuff that we need to learn about. It's not a god to pray to.

Do you all hate me now that I'm ruining all your universe reverence?

I don't know, man, it just bugs me to no end the whole "we know nothing" bow your head in fake humility thing so you can fit into the "I don't know crowd" and be a popular cool kid, too.
> Monopoly: the exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service.

Except that Apple don’t supply or trade in chips. If they were buying up chips and hoarding them it might be considered a monopoly.
It's difficult to estimate the exact wealth of the WEF and their delegates/companies, but it's going to be a very large share, and likely the wide majority, of all wealth on this planet. The group that owns everything, stating you will own nothing and instead just rent [from them] is something few will regard in a positive way.

When the exact people actively working to change the world in pursuit of these predictions make them, they are no longer predictions but goals.
I think the price difference led a lot of people toward the Amiga and probably some toward the ST or PC. I might pick one up for my collection one of these days, but there's no way I'd have had one new.
Not only that, they've released firmware that invalidates even their own older-generation cartridges after they changed the ink formulation. You may have success by downgrading the firmware (they will happily downgrade). Might have to speak nicely to your HP dealer to obtain it though.
many such cases
Check the profile, I'm not claiming that OP is a bot - the OP describes the profile as a bot.

That's a really low quality discussion, so I will leave it here. Can we please not turn HN into reddit? If you have an argument write an argument instead of trying to insult people(or don't write anything, we don't have deficiency of this type of attitude).
List all comments of a blog: GET /blog_comments/:blogId

Creating a new comment: POST /comments (blog_id, author_id, category_id all in the post body)

Single comment: GET /comments/1234

You can pretty much follow all the same normalization rules you would for a SQL database. /blog_comments is a kind of query in a virtual N-to-N resource that maps blogs to comments, get it?

Consider for example, "all posts that this particular author commented on". That would be insane to put into a hierarchy URL. For a flat one, you can just:

GET /commented_by/:authorId

Boom, done. Sometimes, you'll need more than one id, of course, but that does not imply "nesting". Consider "all posts where these two authors interact on comments":

GET /discussions_involving/:authorId1/:authorId2

There is a cap in what you can do with a hierachy, and the web is not a filesystem with folders, it's a graph with unlimited possibilities.
> completely untraceable large-scale money-laundering facilities that can't even be examined under appropriate warrants

It's just private digital currency. If they suspect someone is laundering money, they should have to seek real warrants and then knock on actual doors. They shouldn't be able to just put the burden on corporations and citizens to do the mass surveillance for them so they can prove to the government that they're not criminals up to no good with their hard earned money.

Privacy is a reasonable expectation and these currencies are the tool to achieve it. They aren't to blame when some criminal uses them to do whatever. Are you against citizens having access to cryptography the state can't break as well? Because that's the standard by which these technologies are judged.

> You're making the case for democratic reform here, which I am all for. Democratic reform and democratic oversight. Sounds good.

Sounds great but until such a thing happens there is no reason to trust these governments.

The corrupt buying democracy out from under us? It's already happening, it's not even hidden and money laundering laws don't stop anything. We have these billion dollar corporations lobbying the US government, essentially buying laws that favor them. Copyright industry robbed the people of their public domain rights and these traditional laws didn't do a thing to stop it.
The article actually mentions those:

> [...] they use JavaScript to offer some of their functionality, like a password manager.

Basically a 3rd-party browser needs to use JS to offer any features or real benefit over simply using Safari. But as a TikTok user you have no benefit when all links open inside the app with tons of custom JS injected that seems to be mainly for tracking you.
I'm thinking that he wouldn't have been allowed to become successful unless there was dirt on him.

It's the sad reality nowadays that the only people who can speak for the average person and for what's right are compromised in some way... They have to be compromised in order to be allowed to get that kind of reach.

Still, the accusations against him sound kind of hand-wavy... The 'waterboarding' thing sounds bad but if consent was given and it was done out of curiosity or thrill-seeking then there is no crime there.
Yes. It’s easy to say “Malthus was wrong” because food production has so far kept up with population growth. What that doesn’t account for is that food production has been subsidized by natural resources like aquifers, topsoil, pollinating insects, cheap oil to make fertilizer and mechanized farm machinery - all of which we need to stop abusing either to save the climate or because they will run out anyway.

We need renewable farming as well as renewable energy, and I don’t see any guarantee that such a thing can support a world of 8+ billion people.
https://archive.ph/ndp3N for those without a subscription.
Oh, you can experience both immense moments of joy in times of tragedy, and vice versa. Your child gets born during intense warfighting. You find your dog (which you thought had perished) again after a hurricane that devastated your home. Your partner dies during a phase of extraordinary success.
I haven't heard a lot of those forever chemicals in the news lately, I wonder why.
Years ago someone had an idea to put electron microscope in a basement of a uni building next to a busy, city-center street in Cracow, Poland, only to be able to use it during nights due to unstable images. Fun times.
Security expert love to discuss ciphers but how commonly old ciphers are exploited by threat actors in real world?

I heard cryptographic weakness are sometimes used to break tivoization/DRM but I don't consider people who do this threat actors - an owner should be free to run any software on own hardware. And an attack on device you hold in hands is completely different than say an attack on remote FreeBSD server.
Explained: Noopener, Noreferrer, and Nofollow Values (2019)
Yup. Actually though about that possibility while writing this.

Quite like I would not use a function argument if I don't need it. So I would avoid putting these parameters in the function signature in the first place. It just leads to confusion at best, and there's a good reason why many compilers emit warnings for this.

I believe a function should only take the minimum it needs, and I believe APIs should not be different in this matter.

Redundancy is good when you actually need it, and not quite when you don't.
Lebensraum
DMSO was purportedly involved in the case of the “Toxic Lady”[1], who apparently used it as a pain relief agent and ended up intoxicating the hospital workers assisting her.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Gloria_Ramirez
I posted the wrong link. :(

The correct one is https://pointjupiter.com/what-noopener-noreferrer-nofollow-e...
Back to what tho? That could change the meaning a lot :)
> They don’t need to know or care about your URL patterns, they just need to follow the hyperlinks you provide.

This is REST. As a backend dev I've attempted this several times, and the consumers of my API never cared about the hyperlinks.

I've tried explaining that the 'delete' hyperlink is only going to be present when the user is authorized to delete the resource, and isn't that wonderful and making your life easier? It turns out, (my) API consumers want to hardcode URLs on their side and have the payload include a can-delete flag. Same across several companies.

I've since mostly given up on making interfaces restful. Anyone has experience with this going the same or differently?
This particular problem I would guess not, but the more general family of problems that is optimal stopping I would expect so.
Lockdown mode is a security measure and not a privacy one.

It disables JavaScript JIT compilation, which makes it slower but more secure.

It should not disable any JavaScript execution itself.
> with proximity to Waitrose

I guess this was a "sufficient affluence" indicator to filter out undesireable neighbourhoods?

(for readers who don't know: Waitrose is a British high-price-segment supermarket)
> Choosing a DB is not premature optimization

That's your opinion.

> it eliminates a whole host of data related problems and smoothens development

I don't find this to be true, but maybe you have different problems than I do.
If your argument for doing something starts with this:

> The teachers felt like curriculum robots—and pushed back. “This seems dehumanizing, this is colonizing, this is the man telling us what to do,” says Weaver, describing their response to the approach. “So we fought tooth and nail as a teacher group to throw that out.” It was replaced in 2015 by a curriculum that emphasized rich literary experiences. “Those who wanted to fight for social justice, they figured that this new progressive way of teaching reading was the way,” he says.

Then it's a bad sign. I'm glad they don't let us get past the second paragraph before turning it into a culture war.

The Minority View in the 2000 report seems a bit less 'culture war' and more thoughtful:

> In the end, the work of the NRP is not of poor quality; it
is just unbalanced and, to some extent, irrelevant. But
because of these deficiencies, bad things will happen.
Summaries of, and sound bites about, the Panel’s
findings will be used to make policy decisions at the
national, state, and local levels. Topics that were never
investigated will be misconstrued as failed practices.
Unanswered questions will be assumed to have been
answered negatively. Unfortunately, most policymakers
and ordinary citizens will not read the full reviews. They
will not see the Panel’s explanations about why so few
topics were investigated or its judgments that the results
of research on some of the topics are inconclusive.
They will not hear the Panel’s calls for more and more
fine-tuned research. Ironically, the report that Congress
intended to be a boon to the teaching of reading will
turn out to be a further detriment.

> As an educator with more than 40 years of experience
and as the only member of the NRP who has lived a
career in elementary schools, I call upon Congress to
recognize that the Panel’s majority report does not
respond to its charge nor meet the needs of America’s
schools. In spite of the Panel’s diligent efforts and its
valuable findings on a select number of instructional
practices, we still cannot answer the first and most
central question of the charge: “What is known about
the basic processes by which children learn to read.”
We still do not know what types of instruction are
suitable for different ages and populations of children.
We still do not know the relative effectiveness of the
three models of reading as bases for instruction. We do
not even know whether the existing body of research
can answer those questions. Therefore, I ask Congress
not to take actions that will promote one philosophical
view of reading or constrain future research in the field
on the basis of the Panel’s limited and narrow set of
findings
Reading that link, those estimates are based upon us keeping temperature increases below 3 deg. In which case most human habitation will be fine.

It also means that analysis is not a good one to quote without qualifiers about 'controlled climate change'
OP has 100k potential customers. If they fail to monetize that, there’s no point in continuing. Beyond that, driving costs down before marketing anything and achieving sustainability should be priority number one. That’s the opportunity, and the only one that matters unless they get some other injection of cash.

Trying to market on a short runway is suicide.
A cool way of reaping benefits of both approaches is to separate client side and server side URLs.

The thing after the '#', which has been called many things in the past (hash fragment, I guess), never goes into the server, so you can play with it using JavaScript to make it meaningful to users, while keeping it simple and flat on the real HTTP requests.
And money. Don’t forget about money injection.

As they say: money buys confidence.
The logbook entry only makes sense if "bug" is a pre-existing term for a glitch, otherwise the humor with the real bug would fall flat. So I never understood how anybody could claim that it was the origin of the term.
One could equivalently say that the thing that really exists is the photon, that is, light is a particle and not a wave, and the weird stuff comes from how photons move through space. That was the view of Feynman at least, espoused in his pop science book "QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter"

Actually I just checked, on page 15:

> I want to emphasize that light comes in this form - particles. It is very important to know that light behaves like particles, especially for those of you who have gone to school, where you were probably told something about light behaving like waves.

Anyway I say "equivalently" because this is just another way to conceptualize the same theory (and make the same predictions), it's not new physics
I'm actually surprised that parasitic infection rate with native parasites (where humans aren't an accidental host) was so low at 30% or less. That would mean the existing treatments were rather effective. Just for comparison, https://www.africaontheblog.org/one-billion-1000000000-negle... claims that half the world's population hosts at least one species of worms.
Thanks - this was my calculation but with, I think, one generation older node density - hence the approx 2x factor difference.
I wouldn't use this at all!

Yeah it looks nice and may feel nice for the first 30 minutes and may fetch some nice compliments from the co-workers.

but i would want a wide comfortable and ergonomic split keyboard instead, which won't push me to slouch and force my wide shoulders in an uncomfortable position for the next 8 hours. split keyboard and a trackball mouse are must these days with all kinds of wrist, shoulder and back pain problems.
Who's "allowing" success, I'd like to make an appointment?
> I think many still underestimate the effect on climate change of livestock agriculture.

We might as well do, but what's the alternative? The less-off people, the plebs, eating less meat? How would that be fair?
No clue how much experience you have with normal webuis but they do not match mine at all.

You can use tab and hotkeys, add hints for auto fill (or just straight disabling them for a page).

Normal UIs are fast enough.

I'm not necessarily advocating for only web but I don't think your arguments holding up with reality
That analysis specifically states it only applies if we keep changes within 3 deg.
I heard a talk by Esther Perel (recommend her TED talks, numerous interviews and podcast appearances) where she spoke about the differences in mindset when choosing a partner between 30-40 years ago and now.

“Before”, one would choose (or even be strongly recommended) a partner, commit, and make it work.

Now (culturally), one expects to find the absolutely perfect person/flavor and have everything worked out at the time of selection.

You can see how such an attitude would drastically limit the choices.

Another difference is that nowadays partnership is expected to include that person being the perfect lover, perfect co-parent, best friend, partner in crime, sometimes therapist etc. while in the past the expectation that the romantic partner would also be someone to entertain us or always understand us or share hobbies etc. was much much lower.

obviously not absolutes but more of a cultural slider which limits choices and puts more stress on relationships.
Wow. There's something absurd about selling dung branded and in bubble wrap.
It would only be good news if the cheap labour owned the expensive machines.