skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think during education yes, during execution of the skills learned in education - not really but also depends.

A lot of people hate how tech interviews are done, right? Cause they have nothing to do with the job the majority of the time. Those are places where I can see improvements.

However, some jobs do genuinely need you to interact with a diverse set of people all the time, for those you need to make sure for the sake of your company & the candidate that they match the criteria. Other jobs, you need only maintain strong relations with small groups, and the requirements for those are a lot easier to hit - even the most introverted people can do well in smaller groups that don't change a lot.

I do really think a lot of evaluations that happen during education though makes a confrontational relationship with learning. You're constantly judged about your _ability to learn_and that has far reaching impacts beyond your first twoish decades of your life. You get scared of making mistakes, you get scared of taking risks, etc.

So, evaluate when it's important for the function & safety of the job, and the candidate. Skip evaluation when its evaluation for the sake of evaluation.
We never send anything unencrypted to S3. I have no clue why someone would not want to encrypt their data before putting it in the cloud…
Are there any tools that actually take that metaphor more seriously, and really do present the existence of your co-workers as though they were each at their virtual desks etc.? Such that those sitting near you (your "team") can be instantly and easily communicated with while those further away require more effort? Being able to have "overheard" messages vs private "whisper" messages maybe? No idea if it would work but I'm genuinely curious.
There is absolutely a different dynamic in the way communications happen when sharing the same physical space, but most of us seem to assume that dynamic couldn't be introduced for remote work with the right technology...
> you had to swap your code with another team. So you had to pick up somebody else's code, figure it out, and then build up on it

Genius idea! Though if my professors did this, I may have been scared away from a career in programming
>but I think there is this naive belief that complex problems can be distilled into terms that laymen can understand

Naive people like Richard Feynman, who said if you can't explain an idea to an 8 year old, you don't understand it? Can you tell us why you think Nobel Prize winner Richard Feynman is naive?
You underestimate the human ability to get away with incompetence. Unfortunately many of those cheaters manage to get in roles where they can hide their inadequacies, either by slacking of their colleagues that do actual work or by sucking up to the right managers.
Clickable version of links:

Python, CSV, NDJSON, R, Markdown, and HTML examples: https://twitter.com/goodside/status/1559801520773898240?s=21...

More creative, non-program output in HTML and Markdown: https://twitter.com/goodside/status/1560953991722418177?s=21...
> They're, for the most part, things we tried to put in libraries.

We need some people who can do things like making those libraries. It also seems plausible that the people who have at least some of the knowledge and judgement to do that effectively will, on average, be more effective on more mundane tasks as well.

Larry Wall is one who wrote (somewhat drolly) about the virtues of laziness, but there was nothing lazy about what he did.
Macros totally fail at keeping varargs out of core because of generics. Try writing emplace_back in Rust, or anything else that would need to generically do placement new.
> often because the artist was the first person to really look at the world in that way.

Rarely was that person "the first". Discovery issues are huge. So huge, I would bet that more artists who are revered had better PR and knocked off a peer than were the originator.

Case in point, you go to Wordle. As you point out, it wasn't the first to think of any of the features it had or the basic gameplay. It was a combination of excellent execution, luck, etc. It's an excellent finished product! But it's not novel.

You went hard between "art is important because its novel" and "execution of the nonnovel Wordle is what matters" without recognizing those are the exact opposite point.
I have an eMac with a CRT screen, and it seems to be missing nearly all of the artifacts people associate with a CRT screen. I'm guessing vintage TVs were worse than the eMac.
Doesn't TFA demonstrate that they are, in fact, the same concept?
No idea if this is you but the number of times I've seen an over eager employee (usually more junior but not always) think they've stumbled upon a great solution to a problem but really they were just missing some details is very high ... we are a very overconfident bunch.

> As I understand it, significant time is spent on the manual part of it all.

Get more details about the problem space before doing anything else.
An important counterexample that comes to mind is the Glass-Steagall banking act, the repeal of which arguably led to the greatest financial crisis in a century https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass%E2%80%93Steagall_legisla...

shows that a) laws do indeed get repealed in the US and b) reducing regulation may even increase the risk of chaos, not reduce it
It's possible to bootstrap GCC starting from only a 357-byte binary seed:
https://github.com/fosslinux/live-bootstrap
Yeah this is some old baby boomer trope about how bad the Mercator projection is, but it's been decades since I saw this hung up in classroom. Globes are a thing and the internet makes much of this discussion moot.
Unless their job requirement is tied to their gender, I don't think being a trans person is listed as "legal fire-able offences" unless you can also be fired for being one gender or another.
Doesn't work for me, probably because my system language is Russian. The button is "Удалить" but neither Cmd+D nor Cmd+У work, regardless of the current keyboard layout.
Clickbait much? It's a realistic portrayal of scales in geography, not psilocybin mushrooms
Trying to understand how this differs in practice. Anyone delegating to a staking pool is forced into their values. Ethermine recently started blocking OFAC transactions, so does the majority of miners in that pool agree with this? If so, what is the defence against censorship in this scenario except for some to exit the pool and use another that aligns with their values?
What if that’s just an analogy though and it doesn’t actually apply to the real situation?

The first tasks we’re going to solve are relatively easier ones, it doesn’t mean they’re the only tasks that will be solved with a technique.
So what's the number of logical qubits we have achieved working practically then? Is this scalable, or is it just going to exponentially require physical qubits for each additional logical qubit?

Genuine question. I've no idea.
>... easily charge royalties in perpetuity for resale of their art...

Hi. Artist here. I have yet to actually see any example of this occurring with a piece of NFT art. Do you have an example of an NFT that is actively collecting royalties for the artist via resale?
The presence of chlorine does not necessarily imply toxicity. Widely used medications like sertraline and loratadine have chlorine atoms.
While it does not address the root question, one benefit of sugar substitutes is that they are many times sweeter than sugar: stevia is 200-300x sweeter, resulting in less total mass consumed. My hopelessly-naive-because-biology thought is that each molecule would be metabolized a single time (by your own liver or your microbiome), resulting in less total impact on your body.
About time! Sailboats are an elitist relic of the past!
That rises another question, imho: who cares?

I don't mean that in a dismissive way, I actually mean why is authenticity important or even desirable when using a medium that allows for infinite copies at near-zero marginal cost?

It's just not the right medium for it. It would be like expecting to be able to digitally transfer a statue.
For people also using other AWS services (in particular compute ones like EC2) this doesn't do anything meaningful.
"I want other people's skin in the game instead of mine" is not necessarily virtuous.
This. It sold to businesses and made it easier to deploy (simple wizard and voila - in the cloud!) and manage chat.

And also to monitor all communication on it. No more of those pesky P2P-encrypted XMPP messages.
Seems like this also works with C++. This was my first time using GPT3, and first attempt at this, no fine-tuning, no cherry picking at all:

Replace the $$dollar-quoted expressions$$ with the content described therein, or follow the directions they contain.

main.cpp
```
$$c++ includes for output$$

$$Vec3 struct with three float members x, y, z. constructor. dot product implementation. $$

$$main method which allocates two vectors, then prints the dot product of them to standard output$$
```

Answer:

main.cpp
```
#include <iostream>

struct Vec3 {
float x, y, z;
Vec3(float x, float y, float z) : x(x), y(y), z(z) {}
float dot(const Vec3& v) const {
return x * v.x + y * v.y + z * v.z;
}
};

int main() {
Vec3 a(1, 2, 3);
Vec3 b(4, 5, 6);
std::cout << a.dot(b) << std::endl;
}
```
I am aware about the libs you mention. Torch is using generators which is a major nono for me, so... Kaffy I always wanted to try but the fact that it's an add on (so I'll get problems when updating) along with the fact that it seems to need a lot of configuration to enable it (as opposed to admin.site.register(Foo,FooAdmin)
in Django) made it difficult for me to decide to try it!

I agree about the n+1. Its a long debate about how useful it is. I understand it is problematic some times but I'd prefer it any time compared to having to declare all joins on my query. Yes, it had bitten me a couple of times when I was new to Django but nowadays select_related and prefetch_related are like a second nature...
Nobody qualified did. But the parent that started this thread did.

> If you leave a child alone with no human contact, it becomes autistic very quickly. So there's definitely types of autism that come from parenting.
I've used Copilot for a little while. I'm away from my computer at the moment but I'm very confident it would generate Fibonacci methods.
> Mostly everything can be done in the traditional way - and much faster indeed. The point of blockchain is a superior social solution, not technical.

That's highly arguable. It's a superior social solution if you buy into a very, very specific kind of "social", and are happy with systems that operate within a very limited realm.

Eg, if you like the existence of things like chargebacks, then the blockchain isn't the kind of solution you want.

And you also need for the entire problem to reside inside the blockchain ideally. Blockchains lose any power if they have to interact with the outside world. You can make guarantees around how ETH moves from A to B, but if say, a physical product is involved then the blockchain can't do anything about it.
Artemis I Moon Rocket Arrives at Launch Pad Ahead of Historic Mission
you’re still repeating outdated histories
there's also a nice subset of maps that have south at the top.

http://gisweb.massey.ac.nz/topic/webreferencesites/TheUpside...
Can you point to any sources? I would like to read about how this will be accepted even if the majority is against inclusion.
There are a few issues with this kind of assignment.

The first issue is that it's really hell on the TAs with all of the administrative work needed to do the swapping between phases. Software engineering is already one of the more annoying classes to TA, and this makes it even less palatable.

The bigger issue is that, on the basis of fairness, you grade in later phases is very heavily dependent on factors that are outside of your control. If you get someone's code who just didn't complete the assignment--that is probably going to happen once a semester--you are going to be at a disadvantage. Even if there is an option to appeal to the TAs and get the unacceptable code base replaced with an acceptable one, that's still likely to be a few days' worth of work lost learning the codebase, discovering its incompleteness, and now you have to start over again.

I'll also point out that it's not exactly real-world experience. It is extremely rare that someone will be dumped on a codebase without a prior author remaining on to help them ramp up on the code.
Teams is terrible for sharing code snippets though, something very broken with its backtick markdown. No proper threading for regular chat rooms either though it does have another type of messaging ("posts" within "teams") where it works better.
Did you try with Safari instead?
Slack combines addressed to you, important, and time sensitive. Limiting Slack to certain things mitigates this. But they push it as all purpose. And they shut down tools that gave more control.
Skyscraper
> What's changed in that regard?

The CSS WG spent quite a lot of time and effort deliberating on a standard which wouldn’t have a significant performance impact. They only support a subset of selectors as arguments, to minimize their complexity.
Because there is already server side encryption. Which I guess means data on disk is always encrypted not sure about in-memory.
Hey Jose, here's how it's working: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.1/ref/templates/language...
> I certainly can't do long division anymore, and I struggle to navigate my own neighborhood without GPS

These are not the same thing at all. Yes calculators and such have largely made long division pointless, but it's still quite useful being able to get around without GPS. especially around construction, GPS is awful.

You need to know the limits of the tools you're using. If you just say "I'm always going to use GPS, because it's always better" you are really doing yourself a disservice.
How to Enable God Mode in Windows 11 or 10
Two of my favorite sources for thinking about map projections come from (where else?) the USGS:

Map Projections: https://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/70047422/report.pdf

and the more comprehensive Map Projections: A Working Manual: https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp1395
Perhaps you should be more upfront when using a personal, not medically accepted definition of a condition when discussing its root causes
It would be very hard to make sure the NSA doesn't have your info if thousands of other unscrupulous players have it and trade it.

One danger of this cancer having infected everything is that back in the day, if the NSA wanted to track people, they'd need to either exploit an existing feature that collected data (which there weren't many, and no guarantee people used them) or convince developers to include backdoors which had its own risks. Any large-scale spying required them to build & maintain infrastructure.

Nowadays, the cancer that is advertising provides a business reason as to why everything should be collecting data, so now the NSA effectively got to outsource their spying (without even any coercion!) and can just ask for the results.
Maybe you missed the cancel-LHOTP movement, e.g. someone else on the thread posted this:

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/little-house...

a heading is "To Live the Impossible Dream." Do we find any sympathetic treatment of Laura in this article? Or is it purely debunking?
Is there a paper on how it "perceives" the I/O conditions?
looking at a globe, the size of the "Pacific Ocean" is what changes my brain
Nice! In general these are better if you run them at the lowest possible temperature. I.e., try temp=0 first for deterministic output and then raise slowly if you need to cherry-pick a better generation.
>Are they allowed to cook meth in the place they are given? What about renting it out so they can get some money to buy drugs? Do they have to ever clean it to avoid bug and rat infestations? What happens when their dealer comes to collect? And will neighbors tolerate a dramatic uptick in porch piracy and prowling needed to get money to buy those drugs?

Most of the comments here makes me incredibly upset and disgusted just by their nature of inhumane scape-goating and denigrating from a privileged position. But its not just that, I lost some hope that people here would be curious enough not to bring up these shitty panels. But these questions are especially wrong, not just by the attitude but also because it is totally irrelevant to homeless of Houston.

All these questions you ask apply to sheltered people with addiction, or sheltered people dealing to people with addiction, and mind you old people (elders, grandparents, who you might think much of and respect [rightly so!]) who can not take care of themselves anymore, as well.* Why would you need to differentiate let alone lump all of homeless people under the label of "addict." Some are addicts yes, however have you thought that this might be not the cause but the effect of their state? They are easy targets for blame, wouldn't you agree that it is intellectually quite an easy way out of interacting with part of our society? Why would you point fingers at those who lose for the whole slew of issues with how modern societies are priced and functioning? For me your comment comes off as an example of ignorant and narrow-minded attitude: assuming the worst and pointing out all the why-nots. I encourage you to study this issue and read upon it, just here for example on HN if you search for homelessness there is a nice study on how Finland provides for them. I hope you can develop some empathy towards these people who are behind the veneer of urban filth just the same as you or me or ancestors from 500 years ago.

Disclaimer: I have been homeless while sober and have been an addict while sheltered and working.

* As far as I know, the contract between old people and society is to move them to homes for the elderly. Which makes me think that while there is more love and money involved, the motives and solutions are the same to both problems
From the Coinbase User Agreement (https://www.coinbase.com/legal/user_agreement/united_states#...):

> 1.4. Governance and Voting. For certain Digital Assets, the underlying protocols offer stakers the ability to vote on matters related to the governance of protocol-level issues. Coinbase may or may not support voting for such assets, and may cease supporting voting at any time in its discretion. Coinbase will comply with your instruction to vote your Supported Digital Assets to the extent Coinbase or its affiliate supports voting for such Supported Digital Assets. In certain cases, Coinbase may vote on your behalf where Coinbase or the applicable protocol does not support delegated voting; in those instances, Coinbase will vote with the protocol’s recommendation.

But what about jurisdictions that compel them to vote in certain ways?

From the Coinbase page on Eth2 staking (https://help.coinbase.com/en/coinbase/trading-and-funding/co...):

> To be eligible to stake ETH, you must: [...] Live in a jurisdiction eligible for ETH staking.

> Which regions are eligible for ETH staking? [...] United States (excluding Hawaii & New York)

In other words: they're just not going to offer the service in any place that compels them to vote a certain way.

I presume most delegatable validators have chosen a similar option: avoiding the problem entirely by not taking anyone's money if they're from those jurisdictions. Just as most ICOs in 2017, when the US didn't have regulatory clarity on crypto being a security or not, just avoided the problem entirely by preventing (direct) sales to US-market investors.
should i cancel my sub to copilot?

alright how do i access gpt3 so i can write it like this?
https://archive.ph/6coOT
I'm sad the Green Goddess's didn't feature as one of the UK trucks. They're still in service in the UK for when the fire service goes on strike for better pay, despite getting double the amount of the armed service personnel covering said strike; about which I am definitely not bitter or cynical about in the slightest.
> You wanting these to be, in English, very closely tied to specific characteristics of expressed gender similar to traditional usage doesn't make it have to be so.

Right back at you - it's your side that's trying to impose changes to the meaning of these pronouns by fiat. You can start using then differently if you want, but it's incredibly entitled to demand others conform to your novel definitions.

> Plenty of humans live in a language where you can't figure out what's in people's pants or whether they're likely to wear a skirt without someone explicitly telling you.

I don't object to neutral statements. I object to deliberately misleading ones.

> What's with showing up every day or two to poke at this with a two sentence reply, when you're active elsewhere on hacker news much more often? Just trollin'?

Quite the opposite; this is such a fraught topic that I'm being very careful about what I write, because I know I won't be given the benefit of the doubt over any slight misspeaking.
I couldn't care less about SF or its residents. So I didn't really invest into this story. If it's a legal state law and has the backing of the state, courts, and a federal court then go ahead.

Until it is, it's just words on paper from people who feel entitled to an area they have never owned land in.

I'm not going to be empathetic with people who want to displace others who have owned homes in an area for decades just so they can be closer to the most desired location on the west coast.
Back then the future was difficult to discern. I entered grad school in 1974 and at that time having a 300 baud modem (30 characters/second) at home was a luxury that only one of my friends could afford. I didn't have a personal computer.

I was creative back then, and I remember envisioning VR very similar to today's VR. After studying visual displays and how they were projected on screens for pilots in flight simulators I presented an idea to my computer graphics class that we could put small displays on a helmet one for each eye and have motion and orientation sensors on the helmet to simulate what a pilot would see in 3D as he looked around the virtual cockpit. I said we could even develop multiuser experiences in a big gymnasium with a virtual landscape displayed in each participant's helmet displays. My professor dismissed the ideas as fanciful, and I moved on to other ideas.

It was easy to imagine a future where lots of people owned personal computers and had modems that could be used to log into servers over dial-up lines; I remembered thinking that player verses player games would become a thing because the number of pairs of users online would grow much faster than the number of users [N(N-1) vs N]. But here, I was imagining a single multiuser server, not an internet.

I was aware of the ARPA NET and had even tried out the PLATO timesharing system. I had a copy of Ted Nelson's interesting book of rambling ideas titled Dream Machines where he talked about hypertext, Xanadu, etc. I was also a teaching assistant for a telecommunications course where we talked about the possibility of fiber to the home replacing analog phone lines and providing bandwidth that could replace video rentals for entertainment.

All of these hints foreshadowed the development of the internet, but I didn't see it and neither did any of my colleagues. The scale and importance of the internet just eluded me.

As late as 1989 when I started a software company, it wasn't clear that the company should have it's own domain name!
It reflects well on Zuck that he can receive sharp criticism, then reflect on his flaws and try to improve.
Try Street-Fighting Mathematics by Sanjoy Mahajan: https://direct.mit.edu/books/oa-monograph/5339/Street-Fighti...
The first thing you want to hear as an investor is that the person you're investing into has as much skin in the game as possible so opening up with "I'm putting other people's money in this instead of mine" is not great.