skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Because publishing supplementary material mostly hurts researchers. As a researcher, you care about getting papers published and accumulating citations, and not much more. Saying that you will publish the material makes the paper look a bit better and legitimate to readers and reviewers, even if you never get around to it. Though to be fair, a lot of venues these days require to submit/publish at least the source code.

Some drawbacks of publishing materials such as code:

- You get random people asking questions about it, taking time away from your research. Not a problem if questions are from fellow other researchers or experts and lead to interesting conversations, but most questions are low quality aka "how do I run this on Windows!??"

- You risk people finding a bug in your research code, making your results invalid. Great for science. Bad for your citations, publication chances, and personal resume.

- You need to clean up / maintain code. Often, there is a bunch of private/company infrastructure stuff mixed with research code. Again time that could be better spent on the next paper.

There is basically no benefit to publishing materials other than Twitter clout and PR. If you think your paper/code can go viral due to the extra materials it's worth it because it leads to more citations.

Also, from my experience a lot of the time it's simply due to loss of motivation. The same reason why people abandon side projects. Researchers typically work on multiple projects, and when a paper is published they are likely already working on their next paper. That makes it very easy to procrastinate on extra materials for the "old project"
> what if the architectural style one wants is type-level metaprogramming?

That's not an architectural style. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Wikipedia doesn't bring in adsense dollars, I'm surprised it is usually still on the first page (frequently it isn't for disease searches, which have some of the highest ad spends).
Once again, Another garbage Verge article screeching about 'crypto's climate problem' or 'carbon offsets' in 'crypto' which has already been addressed and the emissions issues have been already solved by alternative cryptocurrencies using consensus methods such as proof-of-stake, byzantine fault tolerance, and other variants.

In this article, Not even a single mention of one of the largest cryptocurrencies in the world and the biggest smart contract platform, Ethereum moving to a greener consensus method with proof-of-stake after subsequent successful deploys and tests and will abandon proof-of-work which for Ethereum's use was a waste of resources with no benefit and is burning the planet for very slow transactions. There is some action there at least, but obviously the Verge needs clicks to get the anti-crypto extremists in.

So when are we exactly going to talk about the tech bros repeatedly training / retraining wasteful and broken deep learning models on tons of our user data every day which that there is absolutely NO efficient alternatives after 10+ years, and constantly requires hundreds of thousands of data centers which additionally burns tons of CO2 that not only literally caught fire but the models are primarily used for surveillance, spyware purposes which makes society worse?

They won't talk about it because the Verge knows it doesn't get enough clicks for their ads. But any disaster in crypto they won't hesitate to race to publish it with corrections obviously. No matter what you think about crypto in general, an event like the Merge, from a software architecture perspective, it is fascinating and from a climate efficiency perspective, it is a win.

Unlike the Deep Learning going on in the data centers, which there is NO efficient alternative for that purpose other than burn up the planet more by retraining and creating more broken models on our user data for surveillance and spyware efforts.

A total waste that is.
The CHIPS Act won't end US reliance on foreign foundries
Agreed. We need to assume negative rather than positive with new stuff that is going to be produced at such a large scale.
It's worse than a Turing test: it's trying to distinguish between a honest human (writing content they are knowledgeable about or that is original) vs a dishonest human (who writes filler content just to get a higher ranking). It would almost need to be able to read the author's mind to figure out their intention. Or, given a text, figure out if what it is saying is original and/or true.
I'd be curious to hear from two types of experts:

1) Chemists: if someone cleans water with this process, does it clean enough classes of chemicals? Will it be genuinely helpful or is it a drop in the bucket?

2) Civil engineers / water treatment: Given the temperatures and reagents needed, can this be done on utility scale? Is it feasible now or does it require significant breakthroughs? If not on a utility scale, can it reasonably be commercialized to be done at home? If not that too - are there any other ways we can use it to clean potable water?
This method is not simple and does not produce potable water, as it involves lye and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO).

These headlines seem like PR damage control.
But it's very easy to exclude most popular words and use TF-IDF and Google probably uses that to devalue rambling.
People did actually start calling WW1 "The first world war" long before WW2 started. There is even few instances of that terminology going back to 1914.

They were pessimistic there would be more.
Tl;dr: This headline seems very clickbaity, suggesting that the vulnerable code was written in Rust, which is not actually the case.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1966033
As an HN guideline, you should drop the first sentence.

The second sentence stands on its own.

No need for name-calling.
I skimmed his paper and then reread other papers I have on intersex .. the frequency estimates vary but we're ballpaking.

The key thing is that is lower bound as 0.18% comes from a fairly well accepted restrive definition of intersex, there's a larger pool of "commonly accepted as intersex".

So, we can at least agree that these people exist.

> I believe arguments made using this group and trying to apply it to society as a whole is likely not made in good faith.

That's your belief of what others are trying to do and I believe you may be misrepresenting and casting as homogeneous these "others".

Your in good comapny here, the author of the paper does the same in his initial paragraphs when casts "feminists" as a near monolith with a predominant belief. Clearly he hasn't gotten out much.

Fo my part I'm a pragmatic data science, mainly geophyics with a dash of consulting.

I take issue with livestock tracking software that cannot accept by design in breeding patterns - this is something that happens in reality.

I also take issue with older versions of religuos genealogy programs that cannot deal with cycles in a graph representation of a family "tree" - as abhorent as fathers having offsring with daughters may be it's a reality that must be dealt with in order to correctly document Pharohs, Royalty, and various families from the backwoods.

In the same manner it's just poor software practice to restrict fields for Sex: to a simplistic two value entry when clearly the real world is different to that imained or desired.
Though the cost is symmetric, right? The attacker would have to incur some computational cost for the handshake.
This story isn’t about ‘trial by Twitter’.

An online mob isn’t what put this guy’s behavior in the spotlight - it was the reporting done by a journalist who saw through his program and the actions of women who were willing to go to the police, to speak to each other, and to talk to reporters.

The power of social media that this story reveals is the degree to which presence and popularity can drown out important information. He just kept rooting his horn and everyone forgot what his wife said.
I have found that private charter, first class, or business class, at least partially solve the misery side of the experience. You will be jet-lagged at the end of the flight, but you won't have a terrible night of sleep on top of the jet lag (something I find harder to recover from).

OTOH, the idea of minimizing the flight distance is smart - and it also makes it easier to electrify - there is no viable alternative to 10,000 nm routes (yet), but for shorter ones it's easier to imagine.
It's seemingly solvable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stable_marriage_problem
I felt this way about my Eee PC 1000HA a decade ago. Still miss hacking away on it.
I really like quantum flytrap. Happy to see you added a bunch of tools to do basic classical processing of the events, so I don't have to hack around that anymore by like making the bombs conditionally transparent.

One feature request: the setups are small enough that you could fit a description of them into the URL. This would allow people to much more easily share setups on forums and twitter and etc. This is what I did in Quirk and it's been one of the more useful features https://algassert.com/quirk#circuit=%7B%22cols%22%3A%5B%5B%2...
Ah well...
Hacker News, shut up and take my money
Recently I made a couple of attempts to offer early-stage startups on HN both money (small to medium check sizes) and advice... All attempts yielded pretty much zero responses so far.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32515303
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32487830

I've successfully raised capital for my startups in the past (https://medium.com/questmate/how-we-raised-a-us-1-5m-seed-round-at-us-13-5m-using-nothing-but-our-product-ca5215d40a98) and also have a good portfolio of investments into startups either directly or via other people's funds (read: VC) as an LP.

My hypothesis is that, despite economic turndown, investment money is still available in abundance.

So what's yours? Does it sound too good to be true, maybe?
Yeah my 6 year old i7 laptop just shuts down completely when told to sleep, both in Windows and Ubuntu (always has since I bought it). It's definitely some kind of firmware thing that Intel is royally messing up on a grand scale.
The (mis) perception of plastic recycling and its effect on production + consumption is point I'm trying to make.

I'm not speaking to the dangers of plastic itself. Only the the problem takes a back seat if most believe we recycle most plastic. We do not recycle much at all.

From Big Plastic's POV it's a case of "problem solved".

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/plastics-industry...
Duplicate, previously posted here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32515511
Better discription (roughly) of the purely physical case.

ie. Not binary - and can't be accurately represented as such on medical forms and other places with things matter.

You might also say these cases are much more frequent than gold in the crust.
Sounds like they are making salsa easier to adopt

https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/blog/2022/08/18/com...
>Some concrete examples or resources would be much appreciated.

Ok. I am not sure of your current front-end experience level, so I will give pointers as if you are not experienced with CSS grid, forgive me if this is incorrect.

The key CSS items in this case would be:

display: grid;

... which will allow for CSS grid layout, and then for the particular item you discussed, the following two CSS values would do the trick.

grid-template-areas .... for the layout container itself in a pseudo-visual way, and grid-area for the items to be laid out.

Here[1] is a simple example, but if you are a visual-type person would get the idea across.

[1]https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/grid-templa...

The demo at the top of the page is interactive and you can see how easy it is to move around items. Of course these items would already be styled themselves to maintain label positioning and alignment so simply moving the letters in the grid-template-areas value would be sufficient to completely change the layout.

This does not let you drag and drop as in your demo, but it is equally fast and gives instant visual feedback in the browser.

As a side note, I morn daily the continuing loss of desktop applications, which is where I cut my teeth in development. But the explosion of platforms and continued aggression from OS manufactures in the name of "safety" is basically forcing the hands of people to move to web apps. I agree that, in general, they are not as snappy or as light-weight as a well-designed desktop application (a "real" one, not an electron app), but if you know what you are doing you can get close and get all the benefits that do come with web apps.

And, from someone that has done both desktop and web app development, web apps can be laid out very quickly if you have experience. I almost can not think of a single-page (non-animated) application that I can't layout in a single day. This is especially true if you are using an existing UI framework or you have built-up one of your own over time. The time-consuming parts tend to be testing on multiple platforms/screen-sizes for compatibility (iOS being the worst) and the business logic.

Let me know if that is not the type of info you were looking for, and I will be happy to point you in a direction to get the info you are looking for.
Worst part: they got rid of the insert key to accommodate dedicated call and hangup keys for MS Teams.
Fine, the discussion is only what we do about the exceptions? Sweeping them under carpet is not okay - exceptions are still citizens of the country and entitled to the same rights. What if there's a one born with two heads, should the country force them to chop one off because the passport has only room for one picture? Even if it's only one person, that person has the same right to travel freely as anybody else, so it needs a solution.
Data Navigators
We Only Think We Flush It Away
Right, but it's not "air quotes". Those have an element of sarcasm.
I'm out of the loop, can you tell me why evolutionary psychology isn't a consistent concept?
> This makes sense as long as you don't think about it for longer than 30 seconds. Is every country, every person, striving towards the abstract principles of equality and liberty then "French"?

According to a famous quote attributed to Jefferson, yes. It's up to you to adhere to that poetic licence.

That being said, the quote you're commenting doesn't claim that these values are exclusively french, merely that it would be unlike France's identity to deviate from these values.

> Did being French hold no meaning when they were still a monarchy? Was everyone on the wrong side of the French revolution then not French, but some other nationality?

You're building a straw man out of the claim. If someone says that the US society is profoundly democratic, that doesn't mean that the whole population was replaced somewhere between 1775 and 1783. Simply that some events alter and shape the identity of a society. And I believe that there is no discussion that the French revolution was a defining moment for the French society.

> do they, unlike the French

That point is pretty weird. Are you claiming that jews can't also be french? That's a pretty extreme point, usually linked to regressive nationalist ideologies.
> 5. Recruitment loops usually takes several weeks, rarely less than a month. So being asked to be online at a specific time for updates is unheard of (to me), because recruiters know that they may take anywhere from 1 to 4 weeks to get any sort of feedback.

I'd agree to most of your points, but here is some anecdata:

I went from recruiting message to initial call, CTO interview, team interview, HR call and offer in less than two weeks at a very legit company earlier this year.

Some companies can be quite fast at hiring.
Naming things is hard. Often when names are very long, they could be shortened, because they are in a function, which already narrows down the context and makes a shorter name still understandable. Very long names can also sometimes be a code smell, if they are relating to a lot of global state, which is not narrowed down in context by where it is defined.

Sometimes however, it is really difficult to come up with a shorter name. I think it is definitely a skill, that takes practice and never is really perfected.
And again a good example of American Puritanism where someone pass from the status of Hero to Paria as soon as someone discover he has flaws.

Everybody is flawed, damned everybody, including yourself.

And the most extraordinary people are, Often the less acceptable in term of social norms they are too.

- The Most brillant CEOs are often terrible family Dad and with psychological/narcissist problems.... Still they are giving people jobs and making the world a better place.

- Many Brillant scientists have asperger syndromes and are asociable nightmare for the people that work with.... Still brillant scientists that make the world a better place.

- Many authors have self-destructive syndromes and chronic depression affecting their close relative. Still they wrote amazing piece of art.

Same for actors, authors, philosophers, producers, political figures.. your neighbor, everybody.

Nobody is ever perfect even close to this fake perfect public image hero they try to create.

That apply to Dan Price too, whatever he did.

Maybe it is time to grow up America and accept the world as it is.
I wonder why velocipede users end up on the sidewalks. Could it be because they do not feel safe on the road, where they should be? Or that bike lanes have no separation from the road and often have larger vehicles parked there?

In general, I suspect someone is purposely ignoring the gas-powered, 3-ton metal elephant in the room (road?).
You're suggesting that the EM field doesn't need to be quantized if everything it interacts with is quantized, so that the non-quantized parts can never be brought to bear and observed?
"We'll have you know that Soviet microchips are the biggest microchips in the whole world!"
I do this. But what I lack is a tool that lets me choose the caller ID for each contact. I’m too lazy to get two phones.
How would you test it? There's lots of factors influencing someone's psychology; how would you pick them apart to prove causes? The field's dumb.
Google will downrank click-farm garbage and aggregator to improve search results
It's a big shame too, some of the pasture land is desertifying because of the lack of livestock.
Unfortunately, then it comes to these industrial chemicals it's "innocent until proven guilty", at least in the USA.

Untested compounds are constantly being introduced with no awareness of their safety, with no awareness of how they might react with other compounds in the wild (and in the body).
You are right, yet the society is struggling exactly with what to add to the passport. And if you think about, why exactly do they need the gender/sex in the passport at all, in the age of biometrics? Isn't this a moot discussion? People fighting about a useless point, that's all what I see.
"Whoa, backwards training actually made your reaction time faster by 0 seconds!"

Amazing results!
I think the "offending people" is the key here. Why do some people have deep emotional investments over whether some fact is true or false?
Agree. For one, even actually commonly used technology in its self-propelled manifestation like bikes attracts riders that are on the low end of driving ability when electrified, making sharing so-far self-propelled pathways with these participants more difficult than before.

For another, there aren't any good niches for, e.g., (pedal) scooters to move in cities so far. This hasn't been a problem, because the ~5 non-children per city using them so far (to use a number verified by a hard statistical method I call "pulling out of thin air") are easily worked around. Electrified "pedal" scooters OTOH are becoming more pervasive, and thus don't fit into the cracks of mobility, as it were. In addition, shared E-scooters are a plague simply by blocking bike and pedestrian routes because the companies externalize their storage to the public - and their users seem to be unable to not be assholes about it, on average. And the mode of transportation they replace isn't driving cars, but walking, public transport and perhaps short bike rides - all without any increase in carrying capacity for the riders. So they actually increase the environmental footprint of mobility, one of the major drivers of electrification, for all the drawbacks they offer...
Misogyny, Transphobia, Intersex Erasure and Evolutionary Psychology to name a few.
> hookworm larva can penetrate intact skin

typically confined to the dermis though and don't penetrate to the gut to complete the lifecycle. Luckily
Reminds me of the hyper capitalist predecessor to corporate memphis:

http://clipart-library.com/data_images/177477.png

Guys in baggy suits and ties running through fields. You probably remember it from things like manual covers of scanners and stuff.
Keep Your Startup Ideas to Yourself
I'd rather look at socialist realism. Soviet propaganda feels a lot more genuine than these weird corporate caricatures.
Why all those Trump documents exist in the form of physical paper
No, I think the author made his real point deep in the paper and you are supporting it. Read his conclusion.

Hostility, contempt, and derision is used to attack those that have "the wrong" research or even attempts to broach the topic. We are in the middle of a movement where even teaching about sex differences is becoming difficult or impossible.

> This absolute moron

> they're often projecting

> Gee, I wonder how gametes can make a career choice? Maybe they can calculate pi too?

> This paper is kinda funny

QED
I like how you said "possibility", as if 3/8th of a cup wasn't a good enough measurement.
I think this is why Spotify will still have a market, even if their upcoming hi-def offering isn't free, such as with Apple or Amazon. The latter two (and all other alternatives, Qobuz and Tidal) don't have an API and so can't be ported to arbitrary platforms; they are only hi-def on Windows, Apple*, and Android.

Strawberry player is supposed to support Tidal, but I can't seem to pull the ClientID/ClientSecret key from the official client (I guess they closed that loophole).
Wild animals do die of cancer and there are evolutionary pressures in regards to carcinogenesis.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/eva.12025
I'm sure these image processor manufacturers wouldn't mind if they could take their old hardware, implement a better autofocus algorithm, and sell you the same hardware but with the new algorithm as a new product which you have to buy.
It's all about macrodata refinement.
Looking at Amazon.de prices with Keepa it seems that the price has gradually been upped from 450€ in March to 600€ now in August. So they're just price gouging it for whatever reason, probably more demand than they can produce with China still presumably on lockdown.

Checking aliexpress pricing history it seems to have gone for as low as 320€ before covid hit. So assuming he got one of those checkout coupons he could've saved another 20€ easily, making it a flat 300€ as stated. This thing has been on the market for quite a while.
BSDs tend to have pretty good docs in general. Take a look at NetBSD's internals for instance: https://www.netbsd.org/docs/internals/en/index.html
Krita 5.1 Released with JPEG-XL Support, Xsimd for Better Paint Performance
I understood what you were saying; I was trying to answer your question. What I was saying was that the answer to your question of "why might the situation turn out any different with PFAS than plastics" is that one of them appears far more dangerous than the other.

i.e. With PFAS the question for consumers is no longer "how do I (re?)use it efficiently" (as with plastics and recycling), but rather "how do I not use it at all".
Not really, Decathlon is much more focused on sports gear, for just about any sport you can think of. You could go to decathlon and pick up a tent, hiking clothes, a climbing rope, a kayak, protein powder and running shoes all in the same store.

As mentioned in the other comment, the closest thing I can think of is REI, but with significantly cheaper options.