skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Why do you need to spin up VMs? You could use a service like fly.io and have these running instantly.

This is an interesting project.

Is your project so technologically advanced that cypress could never get there? If so maybe you can join forces with them or sponsor them.
In general there's no way to distinguish between: I'm mad (crazy), I'm constipated, I'm angry, babbling (playing random notes), [a sequence of notes played for the disharmony itself], ... there's not sufficient agreement in meaning to be a language.
Windows users are fairly conservative and won't be looking at the latest tech that isn't established yet
we’ve done virtual dom (and better than virtual dom) UI frameworks to death so I guess this is next!
I think the actual process of learning doesn't become that much harder. But what happens to many of us is that when external pressure to learn stops (when we graduate), there just isn't enough internal motivation to keep the fire burning, at least as brightly.
I'm really surprised that Apple let this through. Clearly the Apple emojis are copyright by Apple, and shouldn't be modified by third party apps.

I get annoyed when web apps mess with emojis instead of leaving them as the OS default (e.g. Facebook Messenger).
Hoverboard Go-Kart Build Is a Delight to Watch
If you have to ask this, you're way too used to Linux (and probably Javascript).
Why a linked list?

The linked list is a peculiar data structure which makes a lot of sense in the 1970s because all memory reads cost the same and addresses are small, but is terrible in most cases in 2022 because we have huge addresses and very fast local cache. There still are good uses for the linked list, but they're now pretty esoteric.

Using the list concept with recursion is great, but fast implementations of languages in 2022 do not lean on the linked list. Java's ArrayList, and the terribly named C++ std::vector, are more appropriate structures for a lot of cases where a 1970s algorithms book says "list".
The two explanations or interpretations I’ve come across that recover determinism are many worlds interpretation and superdeterminism. I don’t think either are testable with current technology so it’s not a very satisfying or experimentally useful explanation. At least not yet.
It's also a practical difficulty. Small batteries in PHEV mean they charge slowly (makes public chargers less useful, EV road trips impossible).

Their tiny EV range requires them to be charged daily, which makes at-home charging a necessity in practice. But having such a good access to charging is also a thing that makes BEVs convenient. From this perspective PHEV a poorly-performing BEV with a baggage that reduces its performance, range, and efficiency, and occasionally is a less-efficient ICE to potentially save 20 minutes of time after 2-3 hours of driving at highway speeds.
vim + slimv

check out susam's guide
At the bottom of the article (it was a long one) they mentioned this.

basically you use a game engine (unreal typically) to act if front of circular led tv wall and act inside. It helps with ambient lighting.

Details about the madelorian from Disney use of this:.

https://www.starwars.com/news/the-mandalorian-stagecraft-fea...

Industrial light and magic (vfx house of old) has a bunch of these setups to rent now. Stagecraft is what they call it.

https://www.ilm.com/ilm-stagecraft/
From wikipedia:

> Consequently, the only way that hidden variables could explain the predictions of quantum physics is if they are "nonlocal", which is to say that somehow the two particles were able to interact instantaneously no matter how widely the two particles are separated.

It's true that with our current theories, instantaneous action at a distance does not seem possible. Yet quantum experiments (wave function collapse over large distances) consistently suggest this might be possible at macro (non-quantum) scales. I think our knowledge is incomplete on this topic.

Gravity is another area where I don't think non-local effects have been fully ruled out. Gravitational waves (energy emitted/thrown off by certain mass/momentum configurations) have been proven to travel at or near the speed of light, but the propagation speed of the first order gravitational effects an open question. This is an area I would love to see more experimentation done. To simultaneously measure the gravitational and optical positions of the Moon or Sun for example.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_gravity
This is the argument being made again and again, but if we look at the realities the average number of occupants was 1.6 in England [1] and is likely similar for other countries. Also have a look at cycling commutes in Finland on YouTube, lots of people. The argument that we can't change how we move is just an argument about not wanting change. I bet if we actually make cars cover all the direct and indirect costs (for both ICE and EV) instead of massively subsidising car travel, people would quickly change. Why do we need to subsidise the choice of a part of society to not want to change?

[1] https://www.statista.com/statistics/314719/average-car-and-v...
What's circular economy? A nice term for "autarky"?
I've always found the copyright status of specific emoji designs to be really confusing.

Under what basis can an individual or company use emoji images outside of text-based messsges?

I frequently see ads that include large scaled up copies of Apple's emoji. Is that allowed?

On TikTok I see people illustrate their videos with huge emoji stickers. What's the copyright situation there?

People seem to treat Apple emoji like clip art. Can you do that? Does Apple offer any clarity anywhere on licensing terms?
Many commenters haven't read the blog post. A retailer app or Amazon One account is not necessarily required. From my understanding, you can simply enter with a credit or debit card.

> Consumers can enter a Just Walk Out technology-equipped store using one of three methods—method types available can vary by store: (1) Amazon One, a contactless identity service that uses your palm to pay; (2) credit or debit card; or (3) app-based entry, using retailer-branded apps.
banks are a Ponzi scheme. a legalised and watered down Ponzi scheme, but a Ponzi scheme nonetheless
I really wish for a functional language which prioritzes readability. I am fluent in like 10 languages but most functional languages are just noise for me. I really like the concepts but the amount of one symbol functions, useless abbreviations (seq instead of sequence) and weird syntax just turns me off.
I would like for some language which kicks the mathematicians love for noise out and embraces readability first principle.
Shops Ordered Lots of Bikes in 2020. Peddling Them Is an Uphill Climb
So are you suggesting?:

Hang on tight

Buy more coin

It will stabilize some day
Dogs don't eat algae, and there are killed beavers also.

Either you have mercury or you haven't. Blue algae are ephemeral and don't store mercury, If I'm not wrong (I could be wrong)

Wildfires can release mercury, stirring the bottom could (in theory) release mercury and environmental terrorists (from Poland, Germany or other countries) can trow poison in the water, of course. We can see a sudden global pattern of environmental crimes all around Europe since the last months (and don't tell me that is climate change, most wildfires were deliberate and systematic).

A start would be identifying the organisms killed, the level of poisons found in the last years and the type of poison(s) found in their corpses.
Note: when running untrusted user code don't underestimate how much of a liability this is.

It's so hard to be truly sure that there's no compromise path. Particularly when optimized for speed like you're saying.

Security vs performance is often an explicit trade off in these scenarios when it's tempting to reuse processes or volumes or VMs.
Ask HN: Best Open Source CMS?
Which CMS would you recommend nowadays for an experienced developer to start a new website/app with and which is flexible for customization?
In the multiverse, this is already happening to several nations called the United States of America.
Are the containers actually full? Or just the empty containers ready to refill?
> But Vim or Emacs with LSP are extremely capable IDEs and have unmatched speed compared to any GUI IDE you can name.

I do not doubt that they are. I use Emacs with a simple config as the default editor to open files with, but I do not know elisp to set up something more feature-rich, and have not felt the need to yet, but I would like to try some day. It is a truly unique piece of software with lots of love put into it, and it is also GPL which I like. The problem is just that the defaults are painful and I want to know exactly what my elisp is doing, and this would take some work. Yes I know that Spacemacs and Doom Emacs exist.

But my comment (the phrasing could be clearer) was about the choice of TUI vs GUI if one was to start creating a new IDE today, in response to the parent comment:

> With enough effort and care, a frictionless experience can be made with a TUI should some "Jetbrains" come along and try to make a commercial product out of it.

In such a case my preference would be to have a decoupled architecture which would allow for both. You can make such nice things with today's computing power and graphics cards, that it would be a shame to not take advantage of it. And the performance can be stellar. We are talking TFLOPS nowadays.
Imperfection of humanity? A lack of resource extraction taxes doesn't have anything to do with humanity at large. Any hypothetical society could implement them today and the topic would be over. There is not much more you could do, frankly.
I think it is majority muslim, but since there are many secular muslims and muslims who consume alcohol etc, then I guess practically speaking you could consider it that way.
>The powerful decide what they need, and their media marionettes manufacture the appropriate narrative(s). Rinse and repeat.

Especially since, in the US for example, 90% of the media reach is owned by 6 companies, and more or less similarly elsewhere...
WordPress? Really depends on what website or app you have in mind.
Ask HN: How does ownership of innovations work in companies?
I have heard about web consultant firms converting to saas businesses. There is also companies that claim that they got their idea when working at FAANG for instance and then started their own thing. How does this work? How can a company encourage innovations and at the same time let the employees own a part of the innovations. I would imagine that if an innovation pops up at a company, the company owns it. But that is not very attractive for the employees I assume. How does companies usually handle this?
IMHO Deno's has been approaching it "wrong", so it'd never take over Node.js. Deno has 3-4 big differences over Node: url-imports/no npm, explicit permissions, web compat, typescript.

As both a dev and as a package publisher, those are either not an advantage, or a straight disadvantage. npm, for all the downsides it has (and it does have them), IMHO has been a huge net positive for the JS/web community. Explicit permissions on the land of 100-dependencies is just a non-starter. Web compat is def the biggest advantage as a dev myself, but Node.js has finally woken up and catching up. I don't use TS so won't comment.

IMHO the main advantage of Deno, like IO.js back then actually, has been to make Node.js stop being sluggish and actually accept PRs/new challenging features.
Spaceballs…

“Hey, I told you not to call me on this wall. This is an unlisted wall!”
I think it's because documentation (and design) requires different skills than writing code. A great programmer is not necessarily a good writer or designer. There are rare gems, people who have a balance of such skills, but most of us struggle to write useful documentation, even the bare minimum necessary for others to get started - or any at all. The code, or the lead dev's brain, is the documentation.

A perfect example of this is documentation generated from docblock comments. Some projects only have such docs, and expect users to go from there. It's as if programmers envision their audience as another machine to program.

I feel similarly about business/marketing aspects of software projects. Many programmers seem to assume, "If you write it (the program), they will come."

Successful software is so much more than just the code, it usually involves a communal effort of various skills, especially human communication, including writing good documentation.
> radical projects tend to founder, or at least become endlessly difficult, the moment they enter into the world of large, heavy objects: buildings, cars, tractors, boats, industrial machinery. This is in turn is not because these objects are somehow intrinsically difficult to administer democratically; it’s because, like the DAN car, they are surrounded by endless government regulation, and effectively impossible to hide from the government’s armed representatives.

Concretely, for a collective to possess a car, they have to (by law) elect a president or whatever, to conform to undemocratic standards of corporate governance. It's literally impossible to do what you suggest in our current system.
Programmers don’t unionize because they are well paid, and there is no structural barrier stopping people who gain skills and experience from getting better paid in the future.

To contrast that look at medicine. Doctors have no union. They have a huge barrier to entry but once you are already a doctor then how much you get paid is determined by your skills and where you work. Doctors can get paid millions with enough prestige on them.

Nurses on the other hand have a terminal limit. Every pay increase is gated by another nursing exam giving an additional certificate. Then in the end, the only upgrade is to doctor. However that means losing all benefits, retraining, and starting in a new track despite both professions being medical. Nurses therefore need a union.

Another thing that stops unionization is the ability to work on your own. Nurses with high enough qualifications can work on their own, but in most cases they still need a supervising doctor even if that doctor is only a warm body. VFX pros are much the same. They need a team with them to work on a big budget movie.

Programmers and doctors though can break away and start their own practice, serving the public directly and no one can stop them. With a little business savvy they can even rival the agencies that would have hired them as employees. If your profession can double as a stand-alone business then you rarely get a proper union.

Even in cases (e.g. electricians) where a union is formed, it will still conduct training and certification which positions it somewhat like a guild.
I don't have advice, but once the interview is over come back here to tell us how it went so that it'll be useful to the next person.

Good luck!
And nowadays we got Eurasia and North America lined around the North Pole.
Just for the data point. Around here (southern Sweden) energy prices for the coming winter may very well be close eight times higher than normal.

The demand for new heat pumps is very high at the moment
The roadway is also required for bikes.
We just use Slack DMs to propose a huddle when appropriate. If I cant talk immediately, I can propose a time frame ("give me 5 or so"). This article seems super over-engineered to me.
It's ironic that you ask where to park cargo bike while at the same time proposing EVs. Where do they park? Where do they drive? We are occupying massive amounts of land for car infrastructure completely covering it in concrete and thus contributing to urban heating. At the same time we have study upon study that shows that people are happier in places where they can walk/bike instead of driving.

Small EVs are the type of cars that are needed the least. They are a car for those cases where you essentially did not need a car.
Author of the article here. I am serious about it. It all depends on the way you see the universe. If you look at the universe one way, shuffling a deck of cards is putting that deck into its hands.
Photos of trains on comically unelectrified tracks
Many engineers do not value good docs, even if they say they do.

Many people won’t read them at all, no matter the quality, and so it can feel like work wasted.

Plus writing docs is a different skill set than writing code that many simply don’t like to do.
That's a long list. Wish it was possible to filter it by niche, opensource etc
Most popular Linux distributions include Common lisp packages. For example, "sbcl". if you have Debian/Ubuntu you should be able to install it like this: "sudo apt-get install sbcl"
it sounds like they’re performing the age-old excremental journalistic ritual of barely rewriting a press release
Author here. As a companion to this, we had informal optional daily water cooler esque meetings that we used to fill the “I’ll ask them next time I see them” use case.
So the best way would be to just use electric bicyclea and scooters for daily commutes, trains for long range transport of people and delivery service backed by trains and electric cars and other vehicles, possibly state sponsored to some degree for all deliveries long range and short range.
Hello! Thank you for mentioning my Vim + Slimv guide. I have, in fact, two guides to set up a Common Lisp programming environment from scratch:

For Vim: https://susam.net/blog/lisp-in-vim.html

For Emacs: https://github.com/susam/emacs4cl
HN bubble alert!

I think most programmers are actually using Windows as their development environment.

https://insights.stackoverflow.com/survey/2020#technology-de...
For runtime patching: I needed that twice:
First there was a bug in the stdlib event log logging for windows which crashed when the user was not an admin (2.7 days). We could monkey patch that problem on the fly which was much better than any alternative.

Second I needed to redirect scikitlearn logging to a file. Which did not work because scikit does not use logging but something homegrown. We just overwrite the internal log function and all was good.

Yes it's seldom needed and it's a very sharp sword but it's much better that it's there when you need it. I encountered bugs in .net stdlib which where there was no alternative than to wait for the next release. Very ugly when you need to ship.
It is kind of odd how we ship grains and soybeans farmed in the rain forest to a factory farm in the US and then end up with huge poo lagoons that in theory would have to be shipped back to the farms in the rain forest to act as fertilizer. Instead people just abandon the land and continue with their slash and burn agriculture on a different plot of land.
"Sorghum, a grain that grows faster than wheat and has stronger drought tolerance than corn" in case you're curious, too, what this is about.
I think most not-employed people fall into categories like these:

- People too young to be in employment.

- People too old to be in employment.

- People with illnesses or disabilities that make employment difficult or impossible.

- People who don't have skills that anyone wants to pay them for.

These people are not aristocrats, for sure, but most of them will not be highly effective working for love as opposed to working for money.

Also, being poor can be exhausting. Someone who isn't employed and isn't an aristocrat is likely to have a lot of their mental energy taken up with surviving, which again is likely to make them less able to do wonderful things working for love.

Important note: of course all the above is "most", "likely", etc.; there will be exceptions. Some school-age people are geniuses. Some retired people still have plenty of energy and focus. Some people have illnesses or disabilities that make ordinary jobs impossible but can still do great things if they can do the work on their own time and on their own terms. Some people have skills that others would pay them for if the others had any sense but for whatever reason don't sell themselves well. Etc., etc., etc. But, proportionally, there are going to be fewer people suited to create great things while not employed among that 42% than among the aristocrats of an earlier age. (Or of this age.)

Another important note: Of course the starving artist or writer is something of a cliche, so it was never all aristocrats who were creating great things outside the constraints of paid employment.
I've learned over time that it's much easier to incrementally update existing docs than it is to add them to a large project from scratch - so every single one of my projects, no matter how small, now has documentation from day one.

As I add new features I update the docs to reflect the changes, trying to keep those documentation updates in the same commit as the tests and implementation.

Since I started doing this the quality of documentation I produce has gone up a ton, because I'm constantly exercising those muscles.

It's been a huge win for my coding quality and productivity too - I don't have to remember as much stuff because I can refer back to the docs, and documenting as I go along causes me to make much better design decisions.

Worth noting: I'm a native English speaker writing documentation in English, and I've been blogging frequently and writing online for over twenty years so I've accumulated a LOT of writing experience. So what's easy for me may not be easy for other people!
The boring (and probably mostly correct) answer is that engineers don't like writing documentation so it is the last thing to get done, if it gets done at all. This is especially true of FOSS projects. You may be motivated to spend your free time hacking on something cool and interesting, but spending your free time writing documentation is another matter.
Thanks for your comment. I have mild hEDS and have always been scared by cipro. Now I know it is likely awful.

If only I could mark myself with “never administer cipro and friends” in some way that would be respected even if unconscious…
Cost efficiency is where the money is. Quite literally. Miles per $ is the metric you need to apply to transport. You can fold the life time cost of the vehicle into that metric as well. All the interest, maintenance, inspections, etc.

In short, that's why a lot of commercial fleets are transitioning to electric. Dollar per mile is the only relevant metric there. ICE vehicle technology is basically going obsolete rapidly. Commercially, that game is over.

And the gap is widening every year. We've had a period where the tax incentives were important, helpful and necessary. But that is increasingly just a nice to have thing.

Fundamentally, it's not technically hard to build much lighter and efficient electrical vehicles. So, if the current ones are cost effective now, imagine how much more cost effective they could be.
I would say Emacs with SBCL is a good start. I haven't started PAIP yet, I'm working through the Touretzky Lisp book, "Common Lisp: A Gentle Introduction to Symbolic Computation" as a warmup before starting PAIP. I've found that Inferior Lisp mode in Emacs is sufficient for working through those examples. It seems like a lot of working programmers are using SLIME with Emacs though.
"It is a sobering thought, for example, that by the time Mozart was my age ... he had been dead for six years." -- Tom Lehrer.
The partial decoding is also interesting for another case, I think: polymorphism.
The OneOf implementation in go protobuf is ugly, but this trick could make it bareable.
I'll have to explore further :)
As long as the same background isn’t in both cameras I think it’s doable (facing different directions for dialog) or one with a cropped closeup. Though not sure the software currently support 2 cameras.. kind of an interesting problem.

My understanding it the rendering is done at higher quality when the background is the cameras field of view to save resources.. the rest is there just for ambient light.

Of course this takes a lot of pre planning, but those virtual set ups kinda always do.