skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That's a standard no human driver could possibly achieve, for the simple fact that no human drove a billion miles. I think setting such standards, which will be close to impossible to achieve (and/or take centuries) is helpful.
Doom is the hello world of arbitrary code execution. It's not that it can run Doom, it's that it can run almost anything.
"When I play, the game runs at a smooth 60fps, three times the original’s choppy frame rate. Link’s tunic is light blue to match his updated palette from Breath of the Wild. The climbing and block-pushing speed are increased to soften the game’s more tedious puzzle mechanics, and I can use the extra buttons on my gamepad to equip more items, reducing time spent pausing and unpausing for equipment swaps. There are dozens of other small changes and updates that make the aging game feel positively spry again, and there are even more to look forward to with future releases."

There are many wonderful games from the past that deserve a similar treatment.

It's great when these games get a remake (either by the owner or by a community of devoted fans) and are released again for a new generation to discover them.

Star Control 2 / The Ur-Quan Masters (http://sc2.sourceforge.net) is an old favorite that falls into this category.

Many of the classic Sierra On-Line games (Kings's Quest 1, 2, 3 and Quest for Glory 2) were remade by AGD Interactive: https://www.agdinteractive.com/

What are your favorites?
Because she's about to spend 20 years in jail?
How many human injuries are there per few billion km when humans are driving? Why isn't that the baseline we compare against?
It's a bit like in the 1960s and '70s when musicians regularly ended up in serious tax debt because they genuinely didn't realize that they should file proper returns.

"I'm just a guy who shows up, they hand me some cash, and then I go up on stage and play my guitar. Why do I need to read up on accounting?"

Some software developers are in that state of naïveté about the data they collect about their users.

Even if it's just a blog, it may be collecting and storing data about readers in many different ways: ads, tracking pixels, comment logins, etc.
There is the SAFE stack https://safe-stack.github.io/docs/overview/ where
the E means Elmish
Is the MS in DOMS not muscle soreness?
My understanding is that training every day is good for hypertrophy and perhaps endurance, but that it is not the best way to gain strength. The underlying notion is that the more work you do, the more capacity for work you can do. And that recovery time is nonlinear to the amount of work done, so that more but less intense excercise leads to ablarger capacity for work. However, if you are double fast-twitch and you want to play to your strengths (pun intended), you are going for peak power, not average capacity for work over time. In that case you get stronger by doing things that require more strength. That is going to still require recovery time that will not typically allow work every day. In fact, for strength training, best practice is still to avoid getting out of breath on recovery days.

Hypertrophy is a different goal entirely, and always had more volume than strength or power workouts, this data simply takes that to the logical conclusion. Whether its bro-splits or lots of compound work. You want to maximize average volume over any interval you could pick.
A test is not a specification unless it covers every possible input and output. That’s only possible in a very small set of cases.
Not sure why you're getting downvoted. WeWork is a real business with a real business model that's been making real money, especially now that many companies are downsizing their office space because of COVID. Yes, Neumann is a clown who blew a lot of VC cash on weird shit and made out like a bandit before the party ended, but unlike Theranos, the customers of WeWork did receive exactly what they paid for: flexible office space.
Actually, they are existing in prototype stage.

EDIT: They exists since the 1970s on closed tracks. I remember during my work in 1990s at DASA (Daimler Chrysler Areo Space) they had them on the airfield in Friedrichshafen.
Processors with vector support are ubiquitous. There's no point in trying to escape them, even if you don't want them or use them. There's simply not enough demand for non-vector processors.
Another funny thing is that good ole vacuum tube computers could automate computation before transistors became widespread.
It would depend on the details.

If black kids are dying because the car accelerates in school zones and swerves directly into black kids at high speeds, you can imagine that would obviously be not okay no matter what the statistics are.

My point is that a single metric like “deaths overall” is insufficient. The failure modes need to be reasonable and sympathetic to a human.
Political theory starts with the understanding of groups and how they make decisions.

Large sets of groups of groups don't really emulate the power structure of small groups (say less than 100 people but more than 10).

It seems hard enough to run a small group where everyone feels like they contributed their two cents to the decisions that affect them. And CIV isn't the kind of game where the individuals have perspectives that are hidden and require these structures.

-------

Small group meetings and such probably are best understood by MMORPGs, maybe games like EVE online.

The individuals job needs to be too complicated for one person to understand. So a network of trust needs to be built up.

CIV is ultimately designed for one player to understand everything. It's too simple for a group structure to unfold.
Sounds a lot like high volume training like 8x8s or 10x10s where you use much lighter weight and leave a lot of reps on the table but do twice as many or more sets.

For anyone interested, the simplest form of that is to use 60% of your one rep max and do 10 sets of 10 repetitions with adequate rest periods in between, 4 minutes minimum. Focus on form and don’t rush the reps.
Probably. I used to think this is a terrible thing, but now I'm kind of curious as to where it takes us (humanity) rather than having any opinion on where things should go.

I'm not quite 40 yet, but close.

I remember the wonder and amazement and boundless optimism from the early days of home-computers and early Internet.. We didn't deserve such an amazing future anyway.
It was corrected later. That is maybe the reason for the confusion.
It's not entirely surprising. Germany is a federal republic, somewhat similar to the US, with some degree of autonomy for its member states. Switzerland is a confederacy.
Interesting. Why would the german media censor the car brand? Arent consumers meant to know which one flopped this badly?
In case you, or others here, have not encountered it yet: https://openai.com/blog/jukebox/
Bush-Obama-Trump-Biden systems has almost 0 impact on what my city/county/state decide to do about housing. I don’t what the feds controlling my housing and they do not.
There is a lot of static content on https://sqlite.org/ but also a lot of SQLite-backed dynamic content. I just checked the logs. Over the past 5 days, 12.03% of non-robot HTTP requests were against dynamically generated pages.

Most of the dynamic content is generated by the version control system, Fossil (https://fossil-scm.org/). For example: https://sqlite.org/src/timeline or https://sqlite.org/forum/forum

Fossil is hosted on the same machine as SQLite. Fossil is self-hosting and the Fossil website is 100% dynamically generated. Every HTTP request against https://fossil-scm.org/ does about 200 SQLite queries (give or take - depending on the page).
Id love to know what the potential reasons are for it being infeasible. Intuit doesn't want us to?
In socialists systems all incentives are aligned to gamble the system. You do gamble the system by fullfilling the bare minimum demanded from you and squeezing the most out of the rest of whats handed to you, because your material requirements are huge.

Most likely, most of the resources for computer sciences were traded away for others amenities before they ever reached a computation lab. The mentality ist still there in the old citizens of the eastern block. All that remained was the bare minima to do the chop required by quota: "Copy that chip"
Cryptocurrencies are the symptom

The key word is "symptom" --- not to be confused with "cure".
Internet Explorer and older browsers support is important too. You must support browsers released within last 10 years and fetch is too new and experimental for this. I don't want to use something just because it is new and has no clear advantages over older technology.
Don't worry, I know it's not that easy, and good for you for sticking to the design system rules! My sarcasm was mostly directed to the chaos introduced in state services by giant consulting firms doing there own thing quick and dirty...
I'll be adding this to Inflex (https://inflex.io/), I have the design worked out on paper. (But I'll be open sourcing it first and releasing as a desktop app, and then get back to dev.)

It's also helpful to think of FRP in terms of "push" and "pull" (for which there's a related paper by the same chap). This refers to control flow. Behaviours are "pull" i.e. your program has to pull from them. Events are "push" i.e. your program gets pushed to, by some other active agent.

The trick is how one "makes things happen". If you want to pull the latest tweets every 5 seconds, in reverse order, you might have code that looks like:

timer(5).joinWith(latestTweets).map(reverse)

Similar to promises you're always building up more declarative values. It's just that FRP has a clean semantic description. There are laws, and no assumptions about time/imperative escape hatches. It can be quite hard to use it practically for some types of apps; space leaks and cycles are a challenge, and some code can be messy. Research continues.

But for my simpler use-case, it's a very good fit. Spreadsheets use "volatile" cells to side-step the whole issue of interacting with time and the outside world, but it leaves a bad taste in the mouth because it's a hack that makes state implicit. FRP brings a strong mental framework to address this properly, rather than as an afterthought.
Where did I say they were lying? Work on your reading comprehension.
I don't think anyone thought it did.
They are using a ScyllaDB, which is based on lsm trees, so all writes should already be sequential.
I'm happy to answer any question about what data is acquired and how it is acquired. I cannot answer every question about how my system processes the data. I built a novel algorithm that represents economic leverage.

Each hit is stored without personal data but including a salted hash representing the IP. Users are not tracked and are not assigned any type of individual identifier.
Austria: https://design.austria.info/en/design-system/
“Insurance is never a good idea in general” is a bit too extreme. Not all hedges have to be about protecting you from a wipeout. It’s about opportunity cost for the premium vs the risk (magnitude x probability).
Ah, right, I always did overhead dumbbell press so I first thought of that. Yeah 50lbs barbell press is trivial, and using pins or even Smith machine it’s completely safe.
Are you not scared about skipping warmups? This sounds like you aren't doing any. I was sick for a few days and decided to do some TRX rowing (20) and my elbow started to hurt the next day :)
I think it is a great mindset to try to be as inclusive as possible. It might actually improves everyone’s experience.
For roosters, we shall use the cock-chain.
> "This idea of 'a calorie in and a calorie out' when it comes to weight loss is not only antiquated, it's just wrong," says Dr. Fatima Cody Stanford, an obesity specialist and assistant professor of medicine and pediatrics at Harvard Medical School. The truth is that even careful calorie calculations don't always yield uniform results. How your body burns calories depends on a number of factors, including the type of food you eat, your body's metabolism, and even the type of organisms living in your gut. You can eat the exact same number of calories as someone else, yet have very different outcomes when it comes to your weight.

This is just plain dishonest writing. Just because there are other variables, or that different people burn different amount of calories, does not make 'calorie in and calorie out' wrong. If John burns 2000 calories a day and has different organisms in his gut from Sarah who burns 1500 calories a day, in no way disproves calories in / calorie out. All it proves is that people are different, a premise that the modern science community seems to find a challenging notion.
It seems that you are right, the 300Kb number is about an uncompressed version. Still it is very large and includes lot of code I don't need.
Time is still more expensive than fuel in this business. I can believe the 2kwh/m figure at 55-60mph but this is not how trucks are used. As soon as you leave the city limits they are typically ripping along at 75-80mph which uses 1.5-2x the energy. Why would these drivers take the extra risk and effort and burn through so much extra fuel if it didn't pay to do so? A 1 hour charge time is probably nowhere near good enough for these people. That's a reduction of ~75 miles per day (assuming the second charge happens after the shift)
Some AWS, Azure and GCP availability zones run out of third party (at least Equinix) datacenters. It's easier and cheaper for the more "niche" regions - nobody will use the Paris region outside of customers in and around France, does it make sense to build and operate 3 DCs for such a market? Apparently AWS decided that it doesn't and they use Equinix PA2 and PA3, among others, for that.
… and even as employee your are not allowed to share unofficial things with relatives nor to take them on a ride with you.

I used to be hitchhiked in such cars to meetings, because those "colleagues" hat the same route to the same meeting. But officially, I wasn't allowed in.
There is a massive difference between using a library like jQuery and using vanilla JS for similar purposes. I would not be surprised if a lot of frontend devs aren't fully aware that a lot of functionality is now available in modern, vanilla JS vs. using a library.

The website is a bit of a parody, but the numbers are real: http://vanilla-js.com/

For similar functionality, modern, native JS is orders of magnitude faster than almost all JS libraries. The libraries obviously do more, but they also account for older browsers and just by their nature have a lot more overhead.

The point about edge case devices also should not be missed – the assumption that "we have 5G" should be a target is really quite surprising. There are always cases for a more optimum website. When traveling and there is low signal, or people on pay-per-MB plans, and more – there are all kinds of people that can benefit from a slimmer and lighter (compute-wise) website. The stupid fast chips are not used by everyone, in fact, not even the majority.
Apple becomes first tech giant to explicitly ban caste discrimination
Elm started with FRP and moved on to Model-View-Update, which I agree is way simpler to understand and work with.

https://elm-lang.org/news/farewell-to-frp
So add a Redis node or two as cache - exactly the same kind of things they did basically.
A professional datacenter provider, Equinix, provided one year notice for a datacenter closing (PA1). AWS would never do anything like that to their customers.
It's not absurd, quite the opposite. "Calores-in, calories-out" on the other hand is laughably reductive.

If the body was an actual furnace, calories in calories out would be an excellent mantra.

But it is not. It's a complex chemical machine with complex feedback loops. You do not ingest pure energy, you ingest matter that might be processed into food and stored using a ton of different chemical pathways, some more efficient than others.

If I ingest 2000 kcal of cellulose, I indeed get 2000 kcal of cellulose out, not as energy but as undigested faeces. If I ingest 2000 kcal of fat, my body behaves completely differently than if I ingest 2000 kcal of pure carbohydrates, than if I ingest 2000 kcal of pasta.

So, please let's stop with his reductive CICO meme. We all know thermodynamics, but it's a very bad model for explaining how the body handles food, hunger and long term energy storage. Focusing on calories is like comparing vehicle speeds by solely focusing on their horse power. There's a relation, but it conveniently ignores hundred of other variables that might show an opposite outcome.
NASA's Artemis I mission will study deep space radiation like no other
> They irresponsibly stopped the entire economy,

The ... banks?

... irresponsibly?
I think the situation had vastly improved by the mid-late 80s. Contrary to the prediction in the paper in the original post, by the 90s there was a burgeoning software scene in Russia (and I'm sure other Soviet states). My dad worked at a manufacturer where, in the late 80s, he developed FEA software that he still sells to this day (https://quickfield.com).
If you take the national out of nationalisation that is an improvement. Then shove a "personal" in and we're at a good spot.

We want more people to have control over their own home, not less. I'm accepting of the fact that I live in someone else's house and it isn't my choice if I'm here in 12 months - but it is hardly an ideal state of being.

And pretending national politics isn't a big driver of what happens locally is a bit naive. Sticking to the US, the federal government is 20% of the economy. Most other first world countries are probably similar ballpark. That has a huge influence on everyone.
I always thought it was the case that the UG was riskier from a liability perspective but quickly reading over it, it's not entirely clear that's the case.
You could suggest a middle ground, like a design page where you request for feedback instead before implementation. Communication will be async, no meeting is required unless there is no consensus or details need to be clarified and rationale for final decision will be persistent somewhere for the future team to maintain this.

In any case your reasoning is 100% right, perhaps you can sell it to the team with examples of past implementations which were:

- buggy, and the team had to alter them in later iterations

- slow, because there was no design beforehand and devs were stuck for some time trying to figure out what to do

- inconsistent hence you create some mess and potentially tech debt (one dev is using A to solve an issue while another uses B).

It’s the tech lead’s/architect’s/em’s job anyway to identify those and improve the team’s output, keep raising this to them and use specific examples and experiences. If there aren’t any, perhaps there isn’t much value to push for this.
rqlite author here, thanks for the mention, happy to answer any questions.
It's kinda funny how strategy and tactics can cross over between totally unrelated businesses.

We've taken a pretty similar approach to keeping companies honest. What we realized was that in niche markets, trust drives transactions and people are often aware that burning relationships for short-term gain has a drastic impact on lifetime value, especially if there are strong network effects.

Fortunately, we've only had to threaten to use the contractual stick a handful of times, and in each case, the mere appearance of the stick in the conversation served to recalibrate things, bringing the dialogue back to the fair center.

The cold start problem is real and one that really took us a lot of time and effort. The time spent to understand the mechanics of our marketplace manually paid itself back later on, when we realized that it helped us understand churn, and specifically how to mitigate it.

Enjoy the read!
OP is Italian, so that's not an option.

And even if you don't reside in the EU, you can reasonably believe in privacy and abide by the GDPR.
When I say move across systems, I mean from vm to vm not from lin to win.

While a .class file will technically run on any jvm. A java application is usually more complicated and Uber jars don't work if you have stuff in meta-inf e.g. Spring.

I am primarily a java dev and I have no tools or own code that run with java -jar some.jar.
I’d love to have a poster with a monad tutorial in Japanese.
> in all your anecdotal examples, you are misinterpreting what "correlates" means. In particular, all intelligences correlating does NOT mean that "some will have all"

No, i'm saying exceptional intelligence in a field didn't lead to a discernable increase of intelligence in other aspect of life in general, which would actually be the definition of "correlate", in a large sample of people and fields I have seen.

Now you may disagree, or make another generic authority argument which invoke 'scientific studies' that I have yet to see the existence, but respectfully, I'm not here to debate and I'm also quite sure my point of view will not change by reading such 'study'. I was just here sharing my point of view of someone who have seem various exceptional people in various fields and expressing my doubts the whole "intelligence correlate" thing..
Pipewire seems to be the solution for audio... probably. I still have issues with different users that run at the same time not being able to use the same output (i.e. having two Xorg instances in different virtual terminals output to my USB headset at the same time) which is a stupid problem to have, but TBH i'm not sure if it is a PulseAudio issue or a Pipewire issue.

It is most likely fixable, but it hasn't bothered me enough to try and figure it out.
I think volition is the difference. Me wanting to get up and get some water and stretch my legs is something I plan on doing and carry it at a time that I chose. Me being interrupted by someone to ask me something while I'm deep in thought or/and trying to make a feature click is not the same.
It's the salted hash of the IP used to connect.

I did build my approach around the Internet's backbone to future proof. Banning my approach would fundamentally break the Internet. I've made a note and will read into the precedent. Thank you for the research topic.
The title of this article is clickbait.

Every single piece of advice listed can and should be done in addition to counting calories.

The single best heuristic we have for weight loss continues to be “calories in - calories out” simply because you cannot escape thermodynamics.

Yes, your base metabolic rate may be different than others and may change over time. Yes different foods are processed differently by your body. This changes the variables, but again, does not change the calorie arithmetic.
This is akin to me, at least to walking into a bar and being upset there are requirements for shoes in shirt. Nobody is forcing you on my website
Requiring MFA on popular gem maintainers
AWS would probably just silently migrate you to wherever the new datacenter is located.
You are not alone in believing creative work and collaboration are much more difficult in a remote environment.
But yesterday I watched the movie "A dangerous method" about Jung, Freud, and Sabina Spielrein. Well, at the time, collaboration was via paper mail. And my feeling is that they were more creative than we are.
I'm not suggesting to go paper mail, but I couldn't help but observe this fact.
To add to the article's ideas, I would also test by brute force all sequences made from a finite set of values for small lengths. For example:

Length 0: [].

Length 1: [0].

Length 2: [0,0], [0,1], [1,0], [1,1].

Length 3: [0,0,0], [0,0,1], [0,0,2], [0,1,0], [0,1,1], [0,1,2], ... [2,2,2]. (3^3 = 27 arrays in total)

Length 4: (4^4 = 256 arrays in total)

Length 5: (5^5 = 3125 arrays in total)

Length 6: (6^6 = 46656 arrays in total)

Length 7: (7^7 = 823543 arrays in total)

Length 8: (8^8 = 16777216 arrays in total)