skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I agree that the screen is fantastic, but you are wrong about the webcam. The webcam on the new 14"/16" Macbook Pros is complete crap.
Reply to your Edit:

'Instead we should focus on daily fun movements that we like to do. So it doesn't feel like a chore and easy to maintain within your lifestyle.' Yep, I watched the beginning of the video and totally agree with the guy. I feel like my next sentence :

'Have you ever considered that some people enjoy going to the gym? On the other hand I personally couldn't imagine anything more boring than body weight exercises. In the end it is up to the individual to chose the lifestyle that they enjoy, so please stop selling your personal favorite as if any other choices 'are large time investments that can be better spent elsewhere'. I very much enjoy my time spend at the gym, thank you very much.'

basically sums up the guys take in the video. The guy who posted the video on the other hand seemed to think (Or at least seemed to imply) that going to the gym was a waste of time and that everybody should do these 'Micro workouts'. Which is the opposite of the video guy, who expressly said that some people love power-lifting, some other stuff. And that everybody should try to find their flavor and enjoy doing that kind of exercise because doing sport is great and it helps your health in many ways.

If you still think that I wrote something that videoguy would disagree with please write again and I'll check the part of the video you mean. Because he seems like a pretty cool dude, and I certainly don't feel like I disagree with him.
Very cool - how do these solutions affect performance?
Elizabeth Holmes was not convicted of defrauding patients, only of defrauding investors. Adam Neumann has done much the same to his investors.

I would work at a WeWork too. WeWork spaces are great, especially when you compare them to competitors, who didn't burn massive piles of VC cash to make their spaces nice and rent them to me at a loss. That has nothing to do with Adam Neumann, only the money he extracted from investors under false pretenses.
Yes.

Robots killing people are much scarier than humans killing people.

Unfeeling monsters taking lives are much more frightening because we have zero mental models for what motivates them and therefore no way to predict or protect ourselves from them when we encounter them. Statistics don’t matter.

Psychopaths are scarier than normal people even when they have the same outcomes.
I'm sorry, I should have used different language. I thought you were saying the Wikipedia page held no criticisms of him at all.
If experts from reputable sources won't change your mind, I don't think any post on HN will either.
The points in the article are pretty clear.
The gut biome, your metabolism, sleep, exercise , and stress all play role.
I had to do this in order to get an apartment in the US, when I first moved here. Needed either proof of income or a large static amount of money in the bank. Static at time of snapshot, they didn't really care if it went away afterwards.
I'd recommend https://openuserjs.org/?q=linkedin
And all your examples are trained professionals. In case of everyday self driving we are talking about the average joe, I know for sure I wouldn't be avle to jump in in a split second.
That shows you where they are doing peering for example Equinix SG1 - Singapore and Equinix SG2 - Singapore. But DigitalOcean only have one DC in singapore
Between Win95 and Mac System 7 you could see a difference. Between all these "Material" interfaces i see no difference.
It's not ok to plateau at that level. You will get old, your strength and bone density will go down and it is a lot harder (but still possible) to improve those when you are old.

Much better to start with a lot more than the minimum so you have a decent safety margin (and lifelong habits that will keep you healthy for as long as possible).
A lot of gym rats really slag on calisthenics, but there are several one-legged squat type movements that are quite difficult and provide more than enough challenge for most people with typical fitness goals.

For people who want to become especially strong, specialized weights and machines become more important, but as a percentage of the population this group must be vanishingly small. The "do a little each day" thing certainly lends itself better to calisthenics, which can be performed almost anywhere, than to a gym.

I expect a typical person would have better luck doing body weight squats 5 days a week at home than trying to stick to a gym schedule to do barbell squats regularly.
Literally yes. However the soreness you get after working out for the first time in a while (or a new muscle from a while) is DOMS and not the same as the soreness from a good workout of a muscle group you regularly exercise
I am a meat-based robot, and see exercise as a natural form of maintenance. The gym is my favorite physical activity, and I see it as performing physical upkeep on myself, to offset my hilariously sedentary lifestyle.

> I'm here for no reason. Now that I'm here, I'll optimize happiness while creating as little harm as possible to others.

Same, but I enjoy having my bodily maintenance, and the semi-sculpted look I've achieved. Different people will have different fitness goals.
It’s a bad design but historically I saw that to reduce cardinality - with different clients there were dozens of different header values around which would cause your hit rates to be dismal. Typically I avoided that by having Varnish squash to “gzip yes/no” before my CDN got smart enough to store compressed & encode however the client requested.
The theoretical concept of CICO is thermodynamics and indisputable, but the point that the data demonstrates and that these Harvard scientists are discussing is that all of the parts of the equation are so error-ridden and faulty that to combine them together in practice is not effective. Everything from the faulty results of burning food in a calorimeter, to users guesstimating the ingredients in food they cook, to the wide amount of false data inputted to calorie tracking apps, to the extremely complex and still not well understood G.I. tract, to measuring how much each individual can absorb, to how much cooking effects it, to how much the personal biomes between gut and colon play an effect, etc all add up to the reality that there is too much error to pretend the system is useful.

If using the system got you to eat differently, and eating different made you lose weight, then congratulations, but that doesn't prove that the food you ate was actually X calories or that you actually burned Y calories, and that that deficit is why you lost weight, nor does it mean that someone else who ate as much as you did would have their body change in that way.
This is not necessarily true when you are young, but after about age 35, it gets harder and harder to outrun the kitchen.
My dad once told me of how at his work (in the 1980s or early 1990s, I think), they had a team of two Indians assigned to a project. One turned out to be of a much "higher" caste than the other, and refused to work with the other, making him utterly useless to the project.

It's good that Apple, IBM and other tech companies are taking steps to prevent this sort of discrimination. It's a shame that Google seems be going in the opposite direction.
They're testing against actual RUM data collected from the site and linked in the article.
If you read carefully, they are talking about the difference in responsiblity between level 2 and level 3 autonomous driving, with the explicit remark that the driver is fully responsible in a level 2 vehicle and that the vehicle in question is level 2, not level 3. They fully avoid saying whether the autonomous driving was active at the time of the accident or had anything to do with it. It really reads like something has gone wrong and they want to avoid bad publicity and shift the blame on the driver by tiptoeing around the real issue of whether their autonomous driving software caused the accident. Instead they are trying to redefine the general notion of "autonomous" to mean "level 3" which their vehicle isn't.

Translation of the part of the article I'm talking about:
BMW said on tuesday: "The car has a driver assistance system of level 2, which are even today shipped in normal consumer vehicles and which support the driver if they so desire. With level 2 vehicles, the driver is generally always responsible." Only with highly automated vehicles of level 3, the driver may, under certain circumstances, delegate driving fully to the vehicle.

BMW said: "At the moment we are researching the exact circumstances. Of course we are in a close exchange with the authorities. But it is already certain: The BMW involved was not an autonomously driving vehicle".
Yes, it does.

For myself, the screenshots I made for HTML pages work perfectly on Twitter.

And we are releasing a new version this Friday, which includes the ratio dimensions of popular social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, Linkedin, Instagram, etc.

If that is what you are looking for, you may subscribe to our newsletter and get an update when it's ready.
I can't downvote you, and being as dismissive of you as you are of these efforts would simply create more rudeness.

Instead, consider why a governmental agency might want to be as inclusive of as many users of its services as possible, and how your miniscule slice of the world, advantaged as it is, might blind you to that motivation.
Sounds like you've got solid advice on how to not get fit then ;)
The reason why I'm against self driving cars is simply the fact that they're cars at all. I sincerely have no idea why we are collectively spending so much time and resources to avoid the solution we've had for years: public transportation. I would much rather live in a world where I have to deal with the minor inconvenience that is waiting 20 minutes for a train to arrive but get to my destination cheaply and easily than all the insane beaurocracy and overhead that comes with cars existing at all.
If you need another example, read up on La Hague, where Germany also disposed of some of its waste.
Yeah, meaningful benchmarks take a lot of work.

- Does the reported ninja time include the cmake step that generates the ninja files? (which typically doesn't need to be done for incremental builds).

- "make -j" doesn't limit the number of jobs, so you can run into resource contention if building too many things at once. Ninja (by default) limits the parallel jobs to the number of CPUs.

- Disabling make's built-in rules (with `-r -R`) can make a big difference to performance.

- Make spends a lot of time processing the ".d" files with header dependency information -- 98% of the time in my (artificial) benchmarks!
The Passing of PredictIt
In the movie "Dr Strangelove", it's never mentioned, but General Buck Turgidson is seen carrying around a binder with the title "World Targets in Megadeaths". I assume that's a reference to those kinds of studies. It's a really great movie and a good distillation of how absurd the whole Cold War was.
Cloudflare Support Portal gets an overhaul
On highways, the number of human injuries is a lot lower than you think. Most accidents are on surface streets, which is not where most "self-driving" features are purported to be usable.
My impression (based on their Readne) is that the author did this not necessarily for readability, but to remove the abstraction that the database engine provides in the form of the query planner.

The developer is then responsible for selecting the index and storing their data appropriately, which gives more predictable performance and makes reasoning about the behavior of the query simpler(for beginners, not necessarily easier).

This is very much in the pattern of DynamoDB (which they cite), which gives highly predictable performance at all scales by removing the query planner layer and leaving the developer to work out what indexes they need, how to mold their data to them, and how too query them.
.NET 6 is now in Ubuntu 22.04
This is the best advice and perspective I've seen in this thread.
Earlier discussion here:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32479652
Those people will have to work out how to adjust before the web developers, accountants, paralegals, etc. -- but not much before.
That's what "equality of outcome" is; it's not about better it's about equality. When equality of outcome is implemented by raising everyone to a better outcome then it's a fine thing but that's not inherent to the underlying concept.
My experience building with the Notion API and what's missing from it
Africa’s Cold Rush and the Promise of Refrigeration
Ask HN: WordPress plugin development for side income?
I'm currently pursuing my PhD due to which I can't take up a full time job. However, I do have 5+ years of experience working as a developer prior to this. I was wondering if I can generate some side income by developing Wordpress plugins but I am not sure if there is still market for it.

Do share if you have other ideas through which I can earn.
Tokyo is routinely ranked among the ~5-10 most expensive cities in the world to live in:

https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/world-most-expensive-citi...

https://www.forbes.com/sites/anthonytellez/2022/06/29/these-...
Central waterfall-like planning for software at the company level is harmful.

Imagine this at the national level.
IRL meetings are important - but you don't need them 3 days per week. My team has found meeting once per month, or even once per quarter is highly effective. We get together all day, have plenty of whiteboards, and even some team games. We make it fun and productive. It has been working extremely well.

We even fly in the folks who are truly remote - they don't live in the same metro area or even the same state. It's still a lot cheaper and more energy efficient than commercial real estate.
They can't easily filter Apples or Fastmails addresses, since they have @icloud.com / @fastmail.com domains.
Android is a child who never grows up. Is like those children rose by volves.
Is Apple about to become an advertising giant?
They need to be significantly safer. Not because humans are a particularly great, but as a human I understand the psychology of other drivers. Faced with another driver I know I can usually predict better what their failure modes are and compensate accordingly. This goes completely out of the window with self driving cars, whether I'm driving and must deal with them or in situations where all the cars are autonomous. And, particularly this is all bad when being a pedestrian.

Truthfully I despise the way this is going. Why can't we just massively reduce car use?
innnnteresting
> "a black ball: a technology that invariably or by default destroys the civilization that invents it"

I think I see the issue, and I think that summary leaves an important facet out that the paper talks about. It would probably be better as "a black ball: a civilization-destroying technology that cannot be regulated, so invariably or by default destroys the civilization that invents it"
> Browsers have started to add experimental support for the AbortController and AbortSignal interfaces (aka The Abort API), which allow operations like Fetch and XHR to be aborted if they have not already completed. See the interface pages for more details.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Fetch_API#a...
I'm not sure why this needed to be studied...

If you work out only one day you can work out for maybe two hours. You can easily workout an hour a day or even 30m which is still 5 hours a week...

Like, this study is kind of coming to the conclusion that working out more is more progress and we'll...yea duh
OCaml fits the bill for me. It is an amazing language, very practical, fast, and easy to code with. It is a shame that I didn't discover OCaml sooner.

FWIW, I tried Elm, Haskell, PureScript, Elixir.
I was once worried because there is layer between my code and I/O in increasing number of technologies, so others may control what I can do with computer and its communication with the world. Solution is simple. Just stand up and walk away from locked technologies (it is not like real prison or anything like that). Some people try to jailbreak or find holes in sandbox , these are the same people that help to improve jails , sandboxes, locks, etc...
Why Nike Is Closing Offices Around the World Next Week
> I would much rather live in a world where I have to deal with the minor inconvenience that is waiting 20 minutes for a train to arrive but get to my destination cheaply and easily

You can already live in such a world
True, the problem can be confined to many overtouristed districts, not the entire city, but small places seem to suffer much more
I think salted is not enough but peppered per domain and salted sounds good. That way you can not learn what IP visited different websites you track. So hash(IP+domain_bucket_specified_by_user+SALT)
Why is jQuery "render-blocking"? Wouldn't loading it at the end of the HTML or with the `async` attribute fix that?
This is different and circular. If you suspect that your brain might be malfunctioning why would you rely on your brain to diagnose yourself?
Ok, let's try again.

Hospitals are businesses optimizing for their bottom line, not for patient benefit. Law-enforcement has a lot of funding. Sharing data (obtained from humans without a fully developed consciousness) with law enforcement (for whatever purposes they want) is a massive overreach and has nothing to do with providing care for the patient. So, their best interest is not your best interest, but we should trust them implicitly?
A legit but marginal worry is that Neumann is convincing enough that he will, at some point, succeed in a government bailout.
Please do not use Python for tooling
While I don't like TRX, it was originally designed by a Navy Seal to provide a full-body workout. So long as it helps you achieve your goals, it may be all you need.
A Programmer’s Utopia
Cheap lesson as corporate lessons go.
That explains my muscle development after having kids. Basically just doing squats and lifts throughout the day. Lots of tag based cardio to round it out and those multiple peanut butter and jelly sandwiches every day probably helps as well.
OK, how about this take:

Cartels, monopoly, and regulatory capture are inherent to the human condition.
A slap in the face?

Do you want them to put out free content that took a lot of money to co-ordinate and produce or do you want them to spend a lot of money setting up a paywall for access that very few people will buy?
I did hit a weird edge case in Make's job scheduling. Ninja will try to build things in the order that they are listed in the "build.ninja" file; make kind-of does too, but if any dependencies need to be built first, the later targets get pushed to the very end of the job queue. This means that you can end up running many resource-intensive linking jobs all at the same time at the very end of the build: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-make/2016-11/msg0000...

It's hard to say how much impact this would have in real-world scenarios.
> If the US falls in the next 20 years, it won't be due to Covid or Trump or nation-level adversaries; it'll be due to the obscene power given to employers, who can literally ruin an employee's life--not just fire him, but anally ravage him in perpetuity with bad references--for any reason or none.

How do you define "US falls"?

>Eventually, unless national governments start dropping serious lead pipe on employers' heads, people are going to tire of paying 30+ percent of their incomes to a government that lets bosses get away with this shit.

People endured much worse in medieval times, and endure much worse right now in China.
In my mind, I would be happy with 75% of the risk of human driving.

That is enough to be clearly better and clearly safer. It is a big enough margin to prevent lying with statistics ('oh, we only count highway miles', or 'yeah we were including with that statistic the young drink drivers').

It also isn't too unrealistic. If (to simplify things) you imagine that every accident has two cars involved and is the fault of just one of them, then a perfect self driving car that makes no mistakes will still be involved in half as many crashes (ie. 50% of the risk). I therefore don't believe it to be possible to exceed that while most cars are still driven by humans.

I would be completely happy with my government telling car companies they can do whatever they like as long as their accident rate per passenger mile remains under 75% of the nationwide average. I'd be happy with that instead of car standards too - if your manufacturer has a safety record exceeding that, they no longer need to do crash tests, brake performance tests, meet headlight regulations, whatever.
It says in the article that Google (and Microsoft, Dell, Amazon + FB/Meta) aren't (yet?) implementing this, but I didn't see anything about them doing the opposite. Additionally I don't imagine they'd gain much from doing so, as a business. Is there any more info on this?
Huh, my experience with Rx-Java is (partially) the opposite to yours. Partially because I've seen it used poorly in one project, and it was quite horrible, but that time it was more due to misusage of RX than it was the fault of RX itself.

The second time I've used it in a big commercial project it was used well, and that remains the best codebase I've ever worked with. Super easy to reason about, extremely performant, easily the cleanest asynchronous codebase I've ever seen.

I do believe surrounding tooling is important though. Part of why that codebase was so clean was because it used a framework that integrates very well with RX-Java (micronaut).

That said, I've never worked with await/async in any larger project, so I can't really compare the two fairly.
Maybe they just wanted to avoid having an actual layoff in Sep, hoping that some percentage of people will leave.
Pathview does not fingerprint. Full stop.

The salted hash (of the IP address) is used for one purpose: to count unique visits.
There is a draft document on networking.

Since only a single process may write to a database, it would be best if that process were local.

NFSv4 has built-in file locking, which is likely the most preferable protocol. SMBv2 is a massive rewrite of that protocol, and I expect any file locking problems would be addressed (especially as Microsoft sponsored SQLite changes specifically for Windows 10).

Remote readers in explicit read-only mode likely won't hurt, but there is a deeper discussion below.

https://www.sqlite.org/draft/useovernet.html
I think the idea behind most cloud providers is that they abstract details like that away.
Prediction markets are awesome, and I really wish there wasn't an insane amount of unnecessary regulation artificially pushing it down. Sports betting is legal pretty much everywhere now - who cares if it takes the form of a prediction market?
This is the difference between “council tax” a tax on property and “poll tax” a tax on individual people, and that went quite badly when it was tried... So it makes sense for the primary accounts to be per property. However you are quite right they should have a better understanding of a second layer of accounts being individual people.

The IT infrastructure around tax/HMRC is ridiculously complex. The “making tax digital” initiative is trying to fix that. The aim for business taxes, for example, is that each individual business will have a single tax account eventually, rather than separate once for each tax type as they currently do.
I'm 30% tempted to give Linux a full time try again, this time on a Framework laptop. I previously used a Dell XPS 15 (high spec), but it was loud and hot and not a pleasant experience.