skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Of course science and religion are mutually exclusive. You are just playing words games trying to invent another category of truth but there isn't one.
"Annoying"—smart to ask. Infringement doesn't have any effects if the copyright holder takes no action. Holders sometimes even prefer their content to spread via "infringers", such as transcripts of commercials which are often re-performed in recordings by voice talent as samples of their work (demos). The client who paid the agency to write the script usually prefers more people hear about them. This is so common even SAG-Aftra, the union representing some voice talent, suggests (in writing) that it is fine to transcribe and re-record commercial scripts.
Anything that is "native" is going to require FFI integration into whatever dynamic language it is being used with.

Also, C++ really isn't that hard for a JS developer to learn for the purpose of creating a native UI system.

> QtQuick is better than QtWidgets but it's also waaaaay less mature.

No one should be using Quick, IMO.
It's still a magazine. Source: I work at a library and put the September 2022 issue on the shelf last week.
Remember that at launch it was $100 cheaper and more powerful. Multi-plats on PS4 outperformed Xbox One almost always. Usually the PS4 version was 1080p native, Xbox One 900p. Plus storage could be easily upgraded with a screwdriver. And you got the exclusives too.

All of the Xbox One's benefits mainly came later when they added backwards compatibility, 4K Blu-ray support, Game Pass etc.
I wouldn't be worried about overheating - most hardware will shut down for safety way before you reach temperatures capable of igniting a fire. Instead I'm worried about catastrophic failure (especially of power-related components such as PSUs or that UPS) where the thing explodes out of the blue and spits out sparks and flames.

In this case, you'll very quickly get a self-sustaining fire (thanks to all that firewood around it) and will need to actively extinguish it - turning the power off or starting the AC will not save you.

The best solution, short of an active fire suppression system such as sprinklers (which obviously come with their own problems) is to put the hardware in a place where you can have a device catch fire and be confident that the fire won't spread or get out of hand.
You didn't read the article, this is exactly what they are talking about
Why don't you read it and make the judgement yourself?
I use a short bash/perl script to find/replace globally in large files. I have to change the search function each time, although I pass in the file name. Its not sophisticated, but its been very useful.

The reason I like it is also backs up the original in case I mess up the regex (happens sometimes...)

#!/usr/bin/env bash
perl -i.bak -p -e 's/oldtext/newtext/g;' $1
If a new comedian changed the existing 'why did the chicken cross the road?' joke to 'why did the duck cross the road?' and claimed it as a new joke they invented, then that would not be ok, in my opinion.

However, that's not really my primary issue with this article, as I've said in a couple other comments here, my issue is that 'the epsilon method' itself is not a new idea or concept. Both 'copying' and 'copying with slight differences' are already well known by everyone everywhere. So much so that there are whole bodies of law that attempt to define when its ok and when it isn't. The article is presenting this as a novel and insightful idea when it is not.
We used these at Fog Creek for Kiln. One of my onboarding tasks (c. 2013) was to add @2x versions so they would look better on my Retina MacBook Pro. Not all of the icons had @2x though, so I did my best with GIMP and the ones that did exist.
This January 2021 article provided some useful context:
https://captimes.com/news/local/neighborhoods/john-fenley-sh...

I mean, is it unreasonable for the city to expect new drawings/specs for a new use of a building that has been unmaintained for at least 15 years? The fact that the property was sold for such a cheap price basically implies that the new owner should expect to invest a substantial amount of money to get everything up to code.

> Fenley said he selected the site because it was “the largest cheapest building in the country.” When he searched the commercial real estate website LoopNet for properties over 65,000 square feet and sorted by price, he thought the price tag of roughly $300,000 was a typo. The 17-acre industrial property was once home to steel manufacturer Varco Pruden but has stood vacant for at least 15 years and “fallen into disrepair,” according to the city’s Planning Commision.

> Pine Bluff City Attorney Althea Scott told the Cap Times by email that the Planning Commission had approved Fenley’s plans for the site in June, contingent on compliance with building and fire codes. But, she wrote, “the applicable codes can only be determined once Mr. Fenley has submitted the requisite engineer/architectural drawing(s) which identifies the anticipated use and occupancy of the structure. To date, required drawings have not been received.”

> Fenley told the Cap Times that such drawings would cost “tens of thousands of dollars,” and his communications with the city have led him to believe that he would need to bring the entire structure into compliance with current building codes before he could use any of it.

Additional context about Murfie; seems like it was sold for a huge discount: nearly a million CDs sold for less than $10,000. No wonder u/pontifier saw an entrepreneurial opportunity:

https://www.theverge.com/2020/2/5/21121594/crossies-murfie-m...

> Finally, after about a month, Murfie’s investors agreed to sell. Fenley purchased Murfie for only $6,000 plus $2,000 for Murfie’s attorney’s fees, according to the agreement obtained by The Verge. In total, he says the endeavor has cost him about $25,000 so far.

> Murfie’s 930,000 discs are still sitting in its Wisconsin warehouse. No one’s been inside since the landlord changed the locks some time ago, but Fenley says he’ll have access “shortly.”
As someone who has a MA of fine arts and teaches programming to (among other arts) painters I think this criticism is spot on.

If I'd mention Graham's point to our esteemed art history profs they would probably laugh at the man. Especially given how much the approaches and mindsets of actual painters differ. The only thing I'd say is: "Some painters share similar traits with some hackers". But this could be A) literally said about every two subsets of humanity and B) not all of those traits are positive.
I can - easy enough to get a cable there.
This seems kind of...silly. Something that is taught to us all through our lives, since we were toddlers.

Are there any studies for this conjecture?
Another issue I've experienced with these smart TVs is, that the software becomes extremly slow and almost unusable after a couple of years.
Long term being further down the line, i.e. net result in 5 years is still the same regardless of how quickly things evolve.

I'd argue that because happens in 5min that's an immediate effect regardless of if it happens after something or not. How is there any higher order evolution to that?

Are you trying to argue that people can't cope with time in a plan therefore it must be a higher order thinking to understand the rapid evolution of something?
Oh okay, then FTTB is more appropriate. Anyway the 30ms it’s only on this service/server, my setup adds about 1-1,5ms: https://www.speedtest.net/result/i/5236800213

Ping time from router to AP

root@R4S:~# ping 192.168.1.3

PING 192.168.1.3 (192.168.1.3): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.1.3: seq=0 ttl=64 time=1.150 ms64 bytes from 192.168.1.3: seq=1 ttl=64 time=1.252 ms64 bytes from 192.168.1.3: seq=2 ttl=64 time=1.117 ms64 bytes from 192.168.1.3: seq=3 ttl=64 time=1.170 ms64 bytes from 192.168.1.3: seq=4 ttl=64 time=1.210 ms64 bytes from 192.168.1.3: seq=5 ttl=64 time=1.204 ms64 bytes from 192.168.1.3: seq=6 ttl=64 time=1.232 ms64 bytes from 192.168.1.3: seq=7 ttl=64 time=1.190 ms64 bytes from 192.168.1.3: seq=8 ttl=64 time=1.207 ms^C
--- 192.168.1.3 ping statistics ---
9 packets transmitted, 9 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 1.117/1.192/1.252 ms
Lancaster would be a different place without F&M. I've always thought college town meant the college supported most if not all of the local population, something like West Chester, the town would still exist without WCU but it would be just like Downingtown then, nothing super special. I think lancaster would be in a very similar spot.
Ask HN: Bluetooth kinda sucks. Why don't we have something better?
There was a recent, highly upvoted article about the pains of Bluetooth: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32162131

Summarizing only a tiny fraction of the complaints:

- Connecting can make devices do weird stuff (play default songs, etc.)

- Pairing multiple devices leads to unpredictable behavior (random switching, switching when you don't mean to)

- Can't connect multiple headsets to one device (why do my wife and I need to share earbuds watching a movie on a plane?)

- Can't connect multiple devices to one headset (why can't I listen to music on my computer but still get calls from my phone?)

- ...

Why don't we have something better already?

I'm sure the answer spans a number of different fields/challenges. Standardization, security, adoption, regulation. Are there ongoing efforts to create a new protocol that solves for the problems so apparent with Bluetooth? Are there specific (seemingly) insurmountable roadblocks to improving the status quo?

Asking from pure curiosity. And because I spent 5 minutes getting something to correctly pair this morning.
Won’t happen until the government controls the telecoms instead of the other way around.
Hello, I'm the creator of Blitz.js

[Feb 2020]: First announced.
[Apr 2020]: First alpha release.
[Feb 2021]: First beta release.
[Dec 2021]: Decided to do major pivot.

Today the Blitz.js 2.0 pivot to a modular Next.js toolkit reached Beta status [1]

Previously Blitz abstracted Next.js, but Blitz 2.0 is now a modular toolkit that plugs into any new or existing Next.js app. Blitz picks up where Next.js leaves off, providing libraries and conventions for shipping and scaling small to large apps.

When I first created Blitz, my aim was to have an all-in-one fullstack framework for Javascript like Ruby on Rails. But that proved to be too difficult. I've decided that achieving an all-in-one framework for JS like Rails is too difficult unless you have a ton of funding and don't have to make meaningful money.

The difference with JS is that client-side frameworks like React have an incredible amount of complexity. Trying to manage all of that and all the other fullstack framework stuff like API layers, auth, file uploads, etc is too large of scope.

So now Blitz is no longer trying to do it all and is focusing on all the non-frontend functionality you need to ship web apps.

Going forward, we want to be the most trusted technical resource for rapidly building and scaling full-stack TypeScript apps.

[1] https://github.com/blitz-js/blitz/releases/tag/v2.0.0-beta.1
Nick Zentner of Central Washington University did a really good talk about this article and some of it seems overblown, specifically the "west of I5 will be toast."

They've placed GPS sensors throuout the PNW and one of the more interesting things is that Oregon and Washingtons land is working in a spiral, and the land is moving in a circular pattern. Also that the hot spot that creates Yellowstone used to be off the Oregon coast and traveled through Oregon, and Idaho before it reached where it currently is. It's left a trail of calderas that they're only now discovering. The hotspot stays in the same spot, but the earths crust moves over it changing it's position over time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tW4D6OE7Qkc
Email is generally a better async tool than slack/messaging because it has a generally longer response time expectation.

Further when composing an email you have a big open canvas, and an implied workflow of writing, editing, and then finishing before you hit send.

The workflow in slack tends to be ad-hoc, stream-of-thought, off the top of head burst-of-questions. As a recipient this can be incredibly disruptive. As an introvert it often strikes me that even the sender doesn't quite know what they are getting at until midway through.

Obviously email can be used just as poorly, but the built-in workflow bias of the two makes this anti-pattern the default on messaging platforms.

Further on the recipient end, it his harder to setup rules to triage important senders/content away from the noise in slack than it is in email.

Lastly, slack especially gives the sender too many tools to disrupt & cause mayhem. You really only need 1 malicious user in your slack org to make it extremely noisy.

On the email side, someone who is trying to get attention generally sends 1 email with "everyone & their mother" cc'd. On slack, they instead tend to drop into multiple different channels & DMs to try and get attention. Each of these messages to different channels/DMs may set off different threads of noise on the recipient side as people are unaware of other channels/DM recipients trying to address the question. Plus the ability to force more attention with @user/@here/@channel, and force notifications through even if recipient has them paused.
I don't know much about that Email and legal stuff, but here in Germany I pay a couple of Euros every month to a well-known and respected company whose server is set up in such a way that my emails can be used in court without any issue (like claims that I altered the emails after receiving them). At least they claim that and I do believe them. I do not (yet) have a business, but I use it nevertheless. Just in case.
To be fair, they typically ignore all the comments. Claim they are bots or that they lost them or what have you...
That would be infringement—but there is no effect if the copyright holder takes no action.

[From another comment]: Holders sometimes even prefer their content to spread via "infringers", such as transcripts of commercials which are often re-performed in recordings by voice talent as samples of their work (demos). The client who paid the agency to write the script usually prefers more people hear about them. This is so common even SAG-Aftra, the union representing some voice talent, suggests (in writing) that it is fine to transcribe and re-record commercial scripts.
The payload on the missile doesn't need to be a nuclear weapon of any sort. The important thing about the ICBM is that being further away doesn't stop it. Nuclear weapons are the obvious choice because it's hard to imagine why you want to strike something so very far away, at such great expense, with conventional explosives.

The German V2 rocket from World War II has a maximum range of about 320km. So you literally can't fire one from say Berlin to London. They were actually launched from coastal sites in the Netherlands and other occupied countries, and as the Allies took territory after Overlord, the targets changed to cities nearer Germany because the launchers were pulled back.
>there is a very real sense in which programming languages haven’t really progressed since the early 80s.

Can this be made any more precise to somebody who doesn't share the feeling?

As a programming language aficionado, my attitude is the exact opposite of this. 1980 is the debut of Smalltalk. Standardisation of CommonLisp happened sometimes in the mid 1980s. The 1990s is the "Interpreters Renaissance", when Python and Ruby (and other less elegant siblings) came out, as well as the JVM and the proto-beginnings of the CLR. The 1980s and 1990s was an era of massive interest in Partial Evaluation, the revolutionary idea with consequences such as deriving a compiler out of an interpreter automatically. Those ideas were later revived\paid off in projects like PyPy and GraalVM+Truffle, late 2000s and early 2010s stuff. Haskell? 1990, and only popular beginning in the late 2000s\early 2010s. LLVM? early 2000s. SML? OCaml? F#? Scala? Erlang? Rust? Clojure? Perl and its legacy in Raku? Julia? Mathematica? I can go on and on.

Highly skeptical of that "very real sense" that views all of this cambrian explosion of ideas and explorations as not really progress.
Wouldn't it be cool if we could buy kits from Milwaukee and assemble them ourselves?
<I've read the New Testament and I think actually it's the modern Christians who don't understand him.>

Exactly! I'm a former evangelical who could no longer stomach the way they have changed the interpretation of the New Testament to achieve their own means. I'm still a believer and consider ethics as the most important thing any human can achieve. When ethics and the rule of law go out the window humans always turn on each other.
I looked up the stats of SC and noticed that more than one person lives there.
Well that's my point really, this sort of behaviour of the ecosystem leads to exponential 'stuff' to be (not) aware of.

Tauri's the Electron-like bit doing the bulk of the work here. It's framework & JS runtime agnostic, just packages up your compiled frontend with your Rust backend, and provides an API between the two.
My comment was a joke (random intervals don't work that way).
Asbury Park NJ is on the beach, pretty small, and a train ride away from nyc
How to Interrogate Unfamiliar Code
Those committee's just lost contact to the real world. Ridiculous
This was handy before oh-my-zsh but omz has functionality for this now that it's no longer necessary.

pman()
{
man -t "${1}" | open -f -a /System/Applications/Preview.app
}

I like using this in conjunction with pbcopy to quickly generate a random password at given length

pwgen()
{
length=${1:-64}
charlist='0-9a-zA-Z~!@#$%^&*()_+-=:";<>?,./'
echo `cat /dev/random | tr -dc $charlist | head -c$length`
}
Does that mean I get to link you to Bun?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMhScnY0dME

https://bun.sh/

https://xkcd.com/1053/
Already exists all over the world, just Google “co-living”!
shellcheck is so good it's even worth installing the 100+ required haskell libraries
It is also true that people who rob businesses are harmful to society. That is completely independent of the terrible outcomes caused by private vigilanteism.
I had this problem as well. Author later in the comments replied with youtube links:

* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-eZsclPq64
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sV_CbRsnxF4
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlvvlTfSNj8
It is. Great saw, though, if you can make your peace with orange and can't get the Delta flavor (which goes on sale more often, I think).
>You probably replied before I added the bit that suggests in America it's still legal to use unleaded fuel in racing cars, marine and farming equipment (as well as aviation, as you mention).

Somebody call Congress! Think of the children!

Pretty much nobody does this because on the high end race fuels as well as various alcohol fuels are more available and better supported by industry and on the low end ethanol free premium is substantially cheaper. If lots of people did it it wouldn't still be legal. Dumping 100LL into your boat or race car just isn't a good value way to solve a problem anyone has.

> I found several posts from people saying that they buy aviation fuel because they don't like ethanol for their lawn equipment, and presumably people informed enough about the issue to intentionally buy leaded avation fuel would know about other options available).

I hope I'm not the only one appreciating the schadenfreude here. It reminds me of when people unscrew the spout from their crappy compliant cans. Regardless, the overwhelming majority of these people just drag their butt to whatever local station has ethanol free premium rather than go to the airport because it's a faster/easier/cheaper way of accomplishing the same goal.

The current status quo is stupid but the rules are written by a bunch of jerks who either a) DGAF about what happens beyond the next election cycle or b) DGAF so long as they're not responsible and can collect their pension so it's no surprise that the things people do to compensate are non-optimal.
> The reason the delete key is broken in like half of all UNIX / Linux systems is because TTY is short for “teletypewriter” — literally a remote type writer banging out text on dead trees. The carriage can go back one character at a time and overwrite an error but it can’t shift printed text on paper.

Which Linux system/terminal/editor are you using where insert mode is not the default?
i would imagine higher bounty would be for extracting device keys. from my reading this exploit would not allow you to extract the key needed to unlock a powered off device. im no security expert so please correct me if im wrong
What is the bad news?
Duo: Multiple Deployments: Single Sign-On Connectivity Errors
Sure if you didn't have a car, you'd get less groceries at a time, I don't disagree.

That was one example where it would be less practical than a car, cat litter or anything heavy is not practical for a bike either. Rain or other bad weather, etc.

Either way none of this has anything to do with the small town / city comparison, either can be navigated by bikes.

Towns may even be easier to navigate by bike because there's generally one main road, a bunch of residential, and many less cars.
A 2 bed flat for 400K is definitely what I would call expensive housing! It may not be central-London prices but it's certainly high, and unaffordable for many people.
> there’s a fridge, a boiler, the A/Cs, burners with gas, etc… everything could get on fire.

Most of these appliances don't actually have flammable materials right next to the active components that can catch fire. A circuit board can catch fire but it'll likely self-extinguish because it's in a metal enclosure away from anything flammable.
It might be old stock they're clearing, but you can still find V20 at Sears locations around me.
> There are few industries as cynical as venture capital. They won't ever invest in projects explicitly designed for public welfare because "the economics don't work"

As oposed to which industries exactly?
It would be amazing to have a ranking of companies whose products actually work and don't break down after some years. Might be controversial, but I'd place Apple pretty high up there since (excluding the battery thing they did), they built really sturdy hardware that lasts and offer long software support.
0. Email is a method for putting work onto others, or for receiving work from others. Limit the amount of work you consume from email to the minimum amount necessitated by your manager.

Corollary: If your manager necessitates that you consume unbounded work from email, or that you consume work from unbounded sources outside of your manager, you have an ineffective manager.
> Gen 11 PWSE

What does this mean?
Fortunately we've been geoengineering heavily since 2015. If we work hard enough, we can change the planet so much that "the big one" never arrives!