skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I am not really qualified to make this evaluation myself, but I will note that the video is produced by a nutrition-focused doctor in 2015, featuring research from the 2000's. It seems that "endothelial function" a concern, though I don't know what that means.

One of the studies and highlighted paragraphs from the video:

"There was a significant and constant decrease in FMD 3 h after each
meal intake ... independently of the type of oil used for the preparation of
the meal ... or the deep-fry level..."

(I don't know what that means but it was cited in the video as bad, and the research is from 2007)

https://www.culinarymd.org/uploads/2/0/4/0/2040875/olive_soy...
The only Blub language is Python, in that it's sort of the arithmetic mean of everything that came before it, and some that came after it. It doesn't have strong opinions on anything, and it's hard to find agreement on what "Pythonic" code is.
Do you have any further reading or crate recommendations? I have slowly been getting into rust but haven’t really used it for data engineering.
I just read the book (the Rust programming language, free online) cover to cover and started porting all of our Python (command line) apps. It was much, much easier than the internet led me to believe going into it. Just take the time to really internalize them ownership stuff… the rest is syntax and patterns.
if you started replying there, you might have untreated ADHD
I'd argue that many people don't need credit at all outside of a mortgage, which really should have a real investigation into your financial situation anyway.
Negotiate different working hours if you can, I now work 4AM to 12 Noon which gives me all afternoon every day to exercise and work on my own projects.

Bed at 6PM/7PM, up at 3AM
At the time it was the "tailwindcss" package IIRC. I also just tried it again on the latest iteration of that codebase and ran into some import problems, seemingly related to "markdown-it" (version 13.0.1). First I got "SyntaxError: Cannot use import statement outside a module", when I changed the package.json file to add "type: module", as requested in the error message, I got a panic. If you want, I can open an issue for that.

Additionally, I'm currently using at least one function in "fs/promises" that doesn't seem to be supported yet ("opendir") and the "vm" module to evaluate some (trusted) JS.

Most of those issues can be worked around, I just decided to go with Node instead for the time being.
That's not even a little bit true.

Trains only go where there are tracks. Tracks are much more expensive to build and maintain than roads. Trains to do not run on demand.

Bicycles do not protect riders from the elements. Bicycles are not suitable for hauling large or heavy objects, or many objects.

This whole anti-car thing is getting tiresome. Yes, the US needs to dial back its car culture. But cars do have a place, and fill a niche that other transportation methods cannot fill.
Employers cover a majority of the cost of insurance. In Boston, I pay maybe $70 every 2 weeks for health insurance, but on the private market I'd be paying 5-10x as much for worse coverage.
«As it was anticipated that "anything could go wrong", the final part of the flight mission was calibration, where amongst other activities, data was gathered with the spacecraft axis deliberately misaligned for 24 hours, to exacerbate any potential problems. This data proved invaluable for identifying the effects.»

One should always be open to the possibility of a failure, and do everything to meet it well-prepared!
A curated list of resources on Behringer 2600 synthesizers
I wasn't sure if redirecting standard error would affect the exit code
Should be noted that employment in Sweden is as far from “at will” as you can get. There is basically no legal difference between a union worker at a paper mill and a software developer at a startup (once it reaches a certain size). The law basically says that the last one in must be first out, and sidestepping this order requires negotiating severance with unions (yes also for white collar tech workers). So if you need to reduce headcount by 10% it’s going to be cheap if you fire the 10% most recent hires. If you want yo choose the 10% to cull it’s going to be expensive. The compensations in the article don’t look very generous at all.
Yes, I agree. Remote working appears to be more prominent within software. In part, driven by preference of the work force, and strong negotiating power given demand for engineers.

Rest of the work force appears to be back in office 3+ days a week.
I think Klarna can charge slightly higher fees to merchants (it looks like they charge up to 6%) as sales increase with buy now pay later. Also they probably think they can make money off of servicing the debt (late fees, interest on balances).
I work in Deep Learning. Whatever I do on my work or remotely related to my work can be done with Python.

I focus primarily on three things before learning a new language and/or stack:

1. How easy it is to get started and start using it, and how quickly can I get value out of it? This is how I learned flask, and used it many times in production.

2. Intermediate to long term alignments with interests- even vague ones. I never did Edge AI professionally. But I tinker on my own. There are many cookie cutter solutions where you can just plug in your trained model with some constraints. But I learned proper C to handle the low level stuff if I need. I also plan to learn flutter because, I think using tflite with flutter is going to look good. Dangled with Unity for making custom environments for training Deep RL models.

3. Horizon expanding and sheer interest: I like the feeling of being a beginner, and learning new things. I like when I am learning something that is very new to me and expands my mind. I read The Little Schemer for this. Now I am learning the J language for fun. I learned some Clojure for this. I also plan to read Nature of Code. I also did the EPFL Coursera course on Scala by Martin Odersky for this.

This is pretty much how I decide.
I focus on areas I'm curious about, it doesn't matter whether or not it's super applicable at the time. The most important thing about hobby work is that it's about fun and edification.

Keeping four languages in my back pocket is my safety net: one to pay the bills (C++), one for automation (Python), one for intellectual curiosity (Ada), and one for a possible job at a future date (Rust). I've also done deep dives into Ruby and Haskell just to see what's there.

> mostly systems work

Ada is a weird choice that really teaches you to think about the intent of what you're doing and has a tool called Alire that makes getting a toolchain up and running easy. There's a lot you can do on the low level (easily bind to C, make custom memory allocators, bit manipulation, etc.) but the syntax is straightforward enough I can walk away for months and then jump back into it with no problem. Since you're coming from C, it should feel like a strongly-typed C.

As a software engineer, doing hobby work in Ada significantly improved my ability to think through the intent and design of what I'm doing.
I think the point is that they want a link to each comment in its original context.
Cars are already like this. My Skoda Octavia had a headlight levelling issue. Pretty clearly just needed recalibration. Can you do that through the dash interface? Of course not. God forbid they actually use that huge touchscreen for useful diagnostic information.

Took it to my normal garage who are very good, but they clearly couldn't fix it because they didn't have VW's proprietary software tools.

Ended up taking it to an official Skoda garage and they easily fixed it and didn't even charge me. I presume even they felt bad charging someone £80 to press a button in some software that only they have access to.
Good but needs more work. you need to contextualize using the original response and original post. I can see the value of this though. On similar lines, you could probably organize all software / product / business ideas people mention in comments also. Good luck.
Building a basic rest api with rocket is no more difficult than doing the same with Sinatra or flask once you have the hang of it. Arguably much easier if you count time chasing down bugs from unexpected runtime behavior.
Can confirm. Feels slight electric shock while on AC
sorry, i slightly edited my text to clarify that i was talking from the user perspective and didn't mean to imply that i just drop/reject suggestions as a project owner. for that, your list of responses is very good.
It also apparently copies the artist’s logo.

In a way, the “it just does what humans do but faster” argument is starting to follow the “a number can’t be illegal” trajectory.
Private insurance can be thousands of dollars a month, so before Obamacare it was a pretty niche thing. It still kind of is, because for professional jobs the expectation is a massively subsidized health plan. Voluntarily paying an extra $1500/month for the independence of not relying on your employer is not a choice most people would make.
Growing up, #2 was called 'the sermon game', but only letters that started words counted. The goal was not to reach the end of the alphabet but to get further through than your peers.
Status Traps: Learning from Web2 Social Networks
My Spotify playlist for focus: https://open.spotify.com/playlist/0Rh920TsQIOwpfpXg83XIh?si=...
Yeah, simply finding "I predict" leads to a lot of non-predictions, as it's often used as a colloquial substitute for "I believe" or "I anticipate."
Seconded on the prancing pony. It's a nice break from reality.
While Cloud.gov had great fanfare years ago when introduced. Underneath it’s just Pivotal/CloudFoundry buildpacks and standardized security assurances. It’s exorbitantly costly for lower scale projects. Most three-letter agencies have their own security review processes on top of these assurances anyway. So the time-savings expected are quickly diminished.

Someone could do very well for our governments’ efficiency to STOP the redundant overhead in security controls currently. Preventing security teams becoming a gatekeeping police department and staffing/hiring with those more inclined to automate (SecOps) rather than to interpret policy inconsistently would be excellent.
It's still uncompromisingly brutal in the minds of most people.

The 'Swede' I know best (Doctor) left for that reason.

The argument most often used is 'But I Get Good Services' - which I'm suspicious of because 1) well, you could just keep the money and spend on the services you want, instead of the services the state chooses for you and 2) there's incredible efficiency in private institutions. I don't see any government in the world ever making a good 'Spotify'. Despite it's flaws, it's nice to have 'music when I want it'.

In short, probably thinks like 'Healthcare for Everyone' (though maybe not socialized entirely) and better retirement comp. are really good ideas and should be universally applied (much as we now know that 'central economic planning soviet style' is a bad idea).

But 2/3's to the State is just a gigantic amount.

Even a small adjustment such as '15% must go towards your Healthcare Insurance' and then let people pick plans, or, 10% must go to a 'Retirement Savings Plan' (of which some of it cannot be withdrawn until 65 and some of it pooled) might even be beneficial.

I think that would start to create some social nudging functions (i.e. payment for Healthcare) while being a bit more fair (i.e. service quality sometimes proportional to money put in).

And maybe the 66% kicks in, but at some much, much higher rate, like over 1M in income.

Finally, we don't seem to account for just 'organizational intelligence' which I think is the biggest difference.

When I see the lunches Swedish kids get I don't think 'they are rich' I think 'they are smart'.

Lunches, esp. mostly vegetables do not have to be expensive, I think the whole 'burgers and tater tots' you see in USA is just stupid, lazy thinking.

Just being a bit creative with the menu, a bit conscientious with the process, and esp. having children help quite a bit would help. Any school kid can do 'something' and past age 8 they can wash veggies, help clean up, sweep. They do this in Japan for a lot of things, why can't we? I suggest children can even learn to prepare certain kids of veggies responsibly.

Since a lot of education is kind of just 'daycare' why not give them some responsibilities as well? I mean, it's like a 'win win'.

The remaining meal functions can be done by a staff.

We can't avoid inherent costs in things but I suggest there is enormous upside in being intelligent about things in 'whatever' systems: Drugs, Incarceration etc..

My minimal exposure to Swedish startups is that they have way better communications - they present their concepts using language, visuals, way ahead of others. This despite Swedish formal education system flailing a little bit behind others (that's a complicated thing).
p
All of that said I 100% agree that 'safety net' will improve the likelihood of participation 'early stage' startups, not sure what it means beyond that stage.
That's fairly close to my use case for which Discord fails miserably.

But let's not get stuck on this point. There's a dozen other reasons why Discord shouldn't be used for technical forums
I'm not suggesting anything. I'm just saying it's early to say how volatile it is in the long term. In the short term, it's a roller coaster for sure.

But economically and mathematically speaking, a deflationary currency tends to be less volatile than an inflationary one.

Do whatever you want with your money.
For me, a language or tech stack is not more than a tool box to achieve a higher goal, namely solving specific problems. While I do enjoy building software, "writing code" or mastering a particular tech stack is only one component of several things that make software engineering enjoyable.

One of these other things is understanding the kind of problem I want to solve and its environment, by collaborating with stakeholders and domain experts. As soon as I understand their expectations, I decide on the tech stack.

That being said, if I want to make an estimation which tech stacks are likely to be relevant in the long run, I would start with understanding which business requirements will be relevant. Based on that (and maybe more), I can assess which stacks could be a promising fit.

And if I'm wrong, don't neglect the experience I make mastering or learning a tech steck.
I can second Effective Modern C++: https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/effective-modern-c/9781...

The most amazing thing about it is how it manages to be so entertaining to read (the last thing I expected from a C++ textbook and a thing that made getting through it way easier)!

>I'm not sure if there's an even more recent edition that covers C++17 and C++20

Sadly, there is not. Scott for-the-most-part retired in 2015: https://scottmeyers.blogspot.com/2015/12/good-to-go.html
I'd say not all media is "bad". Much of the podcast suggestions in these comments are wholesome, or at least teach the listener something. That'd on a whole good, better than mindlessly listening to ads or news on the radio?
No. Don't be part of dumbing down of the web.

Look how dumbing down UI ended up: baby talk that means different things for different people and cultures, inappropriate, illogical skeuomorphisms, magic touch navigation that not everyone discovers.

Don't be part of any such effort.
my bookmarking site. Not abandoned, i use it for myself regularly, but i dont think anyone else is

https://pinplz.com
But English is not simply a language used for international communication. It's also spoken natively by millions of people. People should be entitled to develop and express a literary culture or eloquence in their own native language without censorship. You can criticize a person for using complex language if their intended audience is international. But can you really make that criticism in general regardless of context? Doing so seems to ignore some basic rights.

It's easy to forget, but things can be beautifully spoken in English. And, as with any other language, it can take some skill to perceive the beauty. Wouldn't it be wrong to modify browsers to effectively restrict the potential for that beauty? Given that the web is arguably the most popular communications platform, wouldn't restricting the use of English on the web place an unfair burden on native English speakers and on English literary culture?
> There's no need in the deno world to even use a package manager

That doesn't sound like I thing I would want.
I do not agree that it can not be described. Maybe said group lacks the means to describe it, but I believe objectively there should be a way to describe it and maybe even isolate it.

Is it specific only to Mozart's music? What if we use an AI to generate Mozart like music? Music AI was a thing before AI was a modern mainstream term (1 , note the date:1997). With a large enough sample set, eventually, if there is a signal we should be able to detect it.

(1) https://www.nytimes.com/1997/11/11/science/undiscovered-bach...
I used the word blessed somewhat tongue-in-cheek. I'm not sure I would call it an advantage, rather just a different set of experiences than a large majority of the tech world.
Sounds like the old old SNL skit about banking.

Wikipedia-
"First CityWide Change Bank – Two ads promote a financial institution whose only service is providing change (e.g. "you come to us with 16 quarters, 8 dimes, and 4 nickels, we can give you a 5 dollar bill"). How does First CityWide make money doing this? As one service rep says it, "The answer is simple: Volume"."
The Cupper Hugo Theme: An accessibility-friendly Hugo theme
>Also, doesn’t entanglement already punch that hole?

How so?
You can still get gifts but that comes from love, not as reward for something mundane.
I was talking about hardware, but thanks.
Yeah, I don't quite get it. The problem with mailing lists is their fundamental design, not the clients for them.
I have an interest in relaxing zoning so I can build. You can't even listen to someone deeply involved in a system telling you how it is broken, or what the incentives you are suggesting will lead to.

* Rent control privatizes the cost of a social problem (poor housing policy)

* Restrictive zoning and other barriers to building are why housing is expensive, this includes historic preservation and permitting too

* Parking minimums are a scourge

If your entire policy is some nimby reach around for single family home owners, I'm not sure anything I say will help you. I literally want to use my money to build more housing. I would also love to unwind all the distortions that currently exist (rent control).

If TiC collectives were a good solution we would see them more in the market. Your solution is just to ruin a market to make it work the way you want, but honestly, people are broke and cannot afford to buy. That also creates so many weird externalities that you seem to be unwilling to discuss.

Goodluck creating a single family home parking lot filled hellscape. I'll be adding units to the market (reducing rents) while you are complaining in la la land.
Yeah! Browsers should encourage the use of rebuses on web pages!
My 2021 M1 Air has it now, as I type. It's a standard UK 3 prong plug going into one of the Thunderbolt ports.

My remaining older laptop, a 2012 Air with MagSafe, also has it. Unless I add in the power adaptor extension cable.

For clarity no non-Apple device does this, including several (now retired) Chromebooks and ThinkPads over recent years.
I used this theme for my blog and really like it. The snippets are good and it has some nice included features. Also it's very fast.
> So I'm thinking of investing in learning a more contemporary tech stack to stay relevant and employable. Doing mostly systems work (performance matters which is why we write in C) I was thinking maybe rust is a natural step for me but then again I worry that it won't get much traction in companies (lots of pushback from devs and management invested in older stacks, learning curve, not time tested etc).

Rust, companies are already investing heavily into it.
No idea. As someone learning Zig currently and finding it quite pleasant, it disappoints me to see that happening.

But I guess it depends on what your goals are. If you want this language to be used by as many people as possible, you want to remove any obstacles to that, and a sign-up wall is a big one. You also have to consider the competition. I can go to my package manager and download compilers and runtimes for probably over 200 languages right now without having to submit any information about myself - I did it for Zig the other day. If your language and compiler are so mind-blowing that I should be glad to subject myself to the friction I have to go through to use yours instead, you really need to sell that to me with more than, as mentioned in another subthread, a promise of ambiguous features not found in other languages.

So free your code. Sell it to me as much as possible on the web site with all of its amazing capabilities and features and libraries. And if some company rips it off and passes it off as their own thing, make hay from it - write up a blog post about how the nasty big evil company stole the work of a plucky li'l FOSS team, but you're just going to keep plugging away and improving your code regardless. Then post it to HN. You'll get updoots through the roof and plenty of sympathetic new eyes on the project.
OK, but I just want readers to be aware that the whole idea that it could take five minutes to parse a million protobufs is completely preposterous. I reimplemented their benchmark just now and it runs at roughly 8 million protos per second, orders of magnitude faster than they state, and I didn't even do anything to optimize it.

https://github.com/jwbee/protobuf-flatbuffer-benchmark
Thanks a lot!

I vaguely recall reading a long time back that managing the emanating free neutrons was also a challenge. Has that been solved?
Ruby also has it and it is easily readable.
It's not a "transaction", it's a relationship: they are never perfectly balanced.

It's also hard to measure one's contribution in a relationship (hey, maybe they were a really good listener; or maybe they can't find time to help you move, but when your kids get sick, they'll move the world to get the best possible care for them?), so let's not go and introduce quick-and-simple rules for what definitely are relations on a case-by-case basis.
Maybe because it brings to mind Hillary's pay-to-play global initiative scam?

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/news/ny-times-hillary-cl...
i think it's manual

Scraping is not really easy nowadays, with cloudflare stopping you
I believe that General Fusion has been in business for over 10 years and that they have yet to actually demonstrate fusion. Definitely not fusion with net energy gain. It's all smoke and mirrors. Their press releases read like they were written by business majors, not scientists. What is the "test reactor" going to test?
That's fair. And to be honest, I have a very similar mindset - so I'm super not judging.

Just making an observation that scaling this up to a population level is tricky. Easy to mangle up the nuances when trying to impart this to children. I suspect you need a relatively stable environment for this to really take hold as well. And finally, you do actually need to be able to feed the child some degree of external success to get them to actually buy into this.
Found another one:

> I predict we will still be using SMS in 10 years.

-malandrew (2012)

Yep. But mostly in the US when cross-OS or automated.
The linked reaction is probably slightly too alarmist but I am also still surprised that this was the field that some manager decided to devote millions of dollars of research and development funds to automate.

I've read in advice for technical founders that programmers tend to want to jump and automate the wrong problems, and this feels a bit like one of those cases in retrospect.