skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Safari already gates password autofill on the secure element (or enclave, I can never remember the difference) when such is available, which is what you're suggesting :D

That said you're absolutely correct, making autofill harder to use would mean people wouldn't use it, and would revert to predictable and reused passwords, and if you're a business you should be using token based authentication be they dongles or phone and PC's secure elements.
It can either be a human directing it once a foothold is established, or an automated attack. Initial compromise may be automated but lateral movement is harder to automate.

If you work on highly sensitive systems then you should expect a human in the loop at some point.
"Praise in public, criticize in private"

So no transparency then.

How about keeping it all public but providing a critique, so everyone can learn and nobody is inappropriately targeted.
One of the main sites many (most?) "digital nomads" go for such information is Nomadlist[1], though this might be a little less US / small town-centric than what you're looking for.

[1] https://nomadlist.com/
High property taxes keeps people out and home prices down in Illinois more than the weather.
thanks for oasis!
It should not be either a map or a phone (with GSP). One can use map when everything OK to develop/maintain the skill and look at phone when feels lost. Relying on a phone alone is especially problematic in rainy weather - capacitive touch screen doesn't really work when there are rain drops on it.
That’s true for most symptom lists of any disease.
This just in from the eggheads: actions have consequences.

I think it’s more likely that what Smart People actually have isn’t some supernatural common sense that allows them to iterate over cause and effect to a greater degree than Joe Stupid, but rather a set of specific domain experience and knowledge that allows them to infer that particular effects follow particular events about which they are reasoning.
Thanks for the TL/DR
The context package didn't exist when Gin was created, so they invented their own solution. There was a proliferation of these context types until the standard library created a common solution. chi uses it, but Echo doesn't. The biggest advantage is that the stdlib context key type is interface{}, so you can use unexported types to create private key namespaces. It's also immutable and thread-safe. Gin and Echo use plain strings that are easy to clobber. This blog post discusses how the stdlib context works: https://go.dev/blog/context (see userip bit about the unexported types).

In many ways, Echo is a "better Gin".
At first your competing with manufacturers who save the pennies and invest in marketing/branding over reliability. And those will do anything to outcompete you (including metagaming like legal actions and smear campaigns). Because if your claims hold, you might reduced the market cap by a few percent, maybe even more.
This means losing out on a lot of sales now and the "recurring" sales (because crap breaks after 2 or 3 years) for another decade.

Later, when you mostly saturated your target market, you're mostly earning on the sales of spare parts (which you produce in bulk every few years and sell from your inventory).
Also, you now have to enter the next market or let go of most of your people. That cycle then repeats, and maybe you re-enter a market to make the next version of a product.

Did you think about a kickstarter to bootstrap with a mechanically relatively simple product, and on which you could compete with a relatively small mark up? E.g. a coffee grinder over a fully automatic coffee maker; or probably something even more simple.
I live in Europe and most Makita gear I have is Made in Europe (e.g. Czech Republic). I do have an impact driver that is Made in Japan, but I had to order that from Japan.
> my impression of email is that it's very hard to use for communication because it's too formal, so it's hard for average people to communicate with

Once it goes external sure, but email is ubiquitous in most companies on Earth and ranges from highly formal to casual shitposting internally.

Many have tried to replace it unsuccessfully despite all it's setup, usability and security flaws, there's a reason for that.

For me: I love the balance between meaningful and impermanence, that I can delete the cruft and organise the important stuff to keep for later, you can filter everything into folders that hits your inbox with a few a clicks, that you can have multiple and shared inboxes for appropriate workgroups. When I worked at _bigcorp_ it was common for a new hire to ask a question and someone would respond in a minute forwarding an email from 7 years ago explaining how to fix the problem.
I bought the warehouse before I really had the money to do it. I was scraping by on ramen for a while.

Buying the others was honestly WAY, WAY, WAY cheaper than you'd expect. I almost didn't feel like I had a choice it was so cheap. Spent about $130k at a tax auction to get them all.

It almost feels like land is the only thing they can't steal around here.
How many humans browse internet with IPv6 only devices?
For the author's stated use-cases, it would be easier to do this via. a chrome extension. Relevant documentation: https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/reference/histo...

Interesting note: the visits.visit_duration column is not exposed through this API (or at least - not listed in the documentation). This may be because it's apparently misleading. (It apparently captures the time the tab was open not the time the tab was active)

Hope this helps
Ashland has dramatically beautiful surroundings and an active arts scene, but it's a long drive from major urban areas and the "university" is a very, very minor outpost of higher education.
That's bad article too. It talks about 1 bad "feature" of specific password manager extension and then dismisses every other password manager extension without verifying if they have this bad "feature" too. And this is from security expert ? Bruh
Encrypting your mass storage devices doesn't protect against malicious code as by definition the filesystem is unlocked once you're logged in. Mass storage encryption is primarily protection against physical access.
Is there a dedicated website for this somewhere?
> Are you sure that the oil slurpped up through a straw is really more environmentaly damaging than hundreds-of-tons of mining activity per bit of Lithium?

Again, a gallon of gas is 2.7 kg, and car consumes thousands of gallons over its lifetime. Batteries are also recycleable, or get a second life as stationary energy storage, unlike gas which just ends up polluting our air. I just can't comprehend how you can even argue for fossil fuels at this stage, it's pure stupidity or nefariousness, I can't tell which.
More Americans are trying to take their weapons on planes
https://www.economist.com/united-states/2022/08/11/more-amer...
> they probably do list all the ingredients on the label

I mean look at the label and you can see this isn’t the case.
> If I'm using binaries from a vendor (whether that's a Linux distribution or a proprietary software company), the vendor needs to be responsible for (..)

I'm not even going to bother pointing how unfeasible all your other points are. I'm just going to point this Fack: you do understand this does not work and never worked at any point in time, don't you?

Do you understand the explicit reference to perpetually vulnerable systems? Do you realize where it cames from?

You only have the power to rebuild the packages you own personally, and even so static libs offer zero ways to keep track of which version went into which build.

Once your fantastic panacea starts to rely on your idea to force third parties to follow your personal orders to make new releases under your own personal terms, you should be very aware that you will not get your wish. You'll instead just keep on using the same vulnerability-riddled release.

Do you understand the importance and value of static libs? You do not need four-point authoritarian and deeply impractical and unfeasible plans to keep your system safe. With shared libraries you just patch the one lib, and all your system is safe.

And again what tradeoff do you want to achieve for this? Nothing?
Dynamic typing makes it too easy to be clever. Which is usually bad all things considered. It makes code harder to understand, and when you want to extend it, or integrate it somewhere else, there might be tons of footguns. In short, unless extraordinary discipline is maintained, dynamic code can quickly turn into legacy code.
How to publish at a top-tier (A*) AI conference?
This year I published at IJCAI-2022 (acceptance rate 15%). My article was selected for a long oral presentation (170/4535). I am the sole author of my article. (https://www.ijcai.org/proceedings/2022/0387.pdf)

The information in the blog could be used by anyone, but I have written this piece particularly for the current and the prospective Ph.D. students who are aiming for their first breakthrough.
https://codedgar.github.io/Puppertino/examples/segmented_con...

shouldn't the markup be a radio box (<input type="radio">) instead of <div> and <a>? I mean it is replicating the radio functionality
Yeah, that's me.
Well, it probably didn't memorize any single of them. One thing that has changed dramatically from back when I studied AI (a whole 5ish years ago, sigh...), to my shock, is that the number of training epochs has dropped dramatically. Sometimes down to just one. If it's only ever looked at your image and updated its weights once, could that really be enough to copy it? Only if virtually everything in your image is also present in thousands of other images, which would suggest there was very little originality in your photo to plagiarize. (This is certainly the case with Obama's press photographers - political press photographers aren't hired for originality!)
This is in the US? I live in Finland and here Makita seems to be _the_ brand used by professionals. At least those that I've seen. Milwaukee exists but doesn't seem to be very popular.
What are you talking about? Saudi were not exploited by western companies. After independence from British, they contracted out to western companies but took the healthy profits for basically doing nothing. Later, they bought out everything and now they have been exploiting the whole world for more than half century. All the oil and assets are basically a personal property of Saudi royal family. The MBS walks into marina in Europe and purchases mega yacht on the spot for $500M in all-cash same day transaction with no pre-planning just because he happen to like it when he saw it. All the while, general public not connected to royal family lives miserably. Saudi then hires managers who goes out like bull dogs to get every last cent from every possible move they can make. This results in supporting Putin to manipulating OPEC so MBS can purchase another $500M painting to hang in his bathroom.
Not sure whether it's AI generated. But for sure it's ad.
What's the point of this apparent straw man? The reason the US can't / doesn't / shouldn't (not sure which, but presume you're suggesting at least one of those otherwise your comment's irrelevant) provide free college is because too many people who support they policy also support continued collaboration with China?

I don't see how that's relavent even if we set aside nuances and just agree for the sake of this topic to say that whatever your view on how relations with China should or shouldn't be is the right one.

edit: oh my bad it's not a straw man, you did create a link in your first comment it was just so tenuous I'd forgotten it.

> Because the folks who would ordinarily be advocating for free community college don’t want kids to go to school to learn those things.

So it's the fault of the left wing for not being left wing enough?
> This just in from the eggheads: actions have consequences.

Everyone can understand that actions have (first-order) consequences. The problem is that most people stop there. But consequences also have consequences, those are second-order consequences. And you can follow the reasoning to nth-order consequences.

The better game players (chess for example but can applied to anything) simply go deeper in the search tree and try to average out all outcomes... that's what higher-order thinking is. You go deeper in the tree and you backtrack.
It’s a more formal record. Chat channels move along and each have their own limitations around pinned messages that complicate using them for important communication that needs to be referred back to.

Even for collaborating on documents it’s pretty common to mail out a specific “version” of the document as something of a checkpoint and to help when referring to things that may be removed in future versions.

It’s for stuff people want to be able to find later. Between multiple people multiple channels a scrolling wall of system notices, it’s basically ephemeral and can’t be relied upon to find important things later in that mess. Did I tag you on that attachment here in this channel, that channel or did I send it to you directly as a DM a week ago, or was it not an attachment but a link to a file in a shared drive so I can’t filter it out of the attachments but have to search everything that is a link…

Organisations also develop their own email etiquette and culture… which can substantially affect how they will balance communication between email and chat.

Also … my personal experience from lots of ideation cycles at everything from improv, to weekend product development hackathons, and so many hours in business meetings. As valuable as an outside perspective can be for development of a new innovative take on something, not having any experience can lead to a lot of problems, from failing to understand the importance of certain technical features your potential customers won’t even mention because they take it for granted no one would even consider offering a service without it, to difficulty gathering feedback from potential and early beta customers because you’re playing catch up trying to learn enough to fully understand what they are telling you. I say this not to discourage you, just to highlight a possible large pothole in the road ahead of you.
> Yet in software you have these weekly "I'm 40, is my life over" posts.

I'm not sure, I feel like on average there's a decrease of openness/neuroplasticity or call it whatever you want with age: people sometimes get set in their ways, choose approaches that worked for them in the past and will be less likely to jump into new technologies as often - having families and other life responsibilities (and having a better ability to balance life and work) will lead to a bit less exploration.

This doesn't apply to everyone, of course, and even then the premise isn't set in stone, but I'd say that you sometimes exchange the desire to jump into bleeding edge technology and innovative solutions for picking approaches that have minimized risks and are more likely to work out long term, a bit like: https://boringtechnology.club/

Not to say that either is better than the other, there is definitely a lot of merit in having experience and having worked on lots of systems in the past. I just wish that the industry itself didn't move ahead so fast and we focused more on the quality of what we have: e.g. more like PostgreSQL, rather than the new seasonal NoSQL database, or looking at React after a few months and finding it pretty different already.

Biases in hiring, of course, are likely to just make the conditions worse for everyone. Ideally, you'd have a mix of engineers of different seniority, that could successfully collaborate and learn from each other. Disclaimer: the biases in my own post might be construed as ageism in of itself, though I'm also kind of speaking of my own experience - as I gradually age, my focus shifts towards building rather than exploring.
I definitely considered that. Then I realized that I would also need to not let the numbers get too large and/or reset them at some point, so I just shipped it.

I may still do this, as it's definitely more accurate that way in terms of representing how it actually works!
Literally no one with any expertise says that energy storage is an unsolved problem.

All do acknowledge that building out storage will be a project of a scale similar to that of building out renewables. Only the most dishonest would insist that the relatively small amount of storage already built demonstrates anything other than that capital is overwhelmingly better used, today, to build out new generating capacity. It would be obviously stupid to spend on building storage you have not generating capacity to charge up.
Sorry... this is above my pay grade, but I still think of processes as running on a single thread, reserving memory and being mostly inviolable other than maybe sampling what they're holding at the moment. How does giving
a tool the ability to analyze a thread allow it to inject code into the process as it's running? Forgive me if I'm just way behind but isn't the kernel of any modern OS supposed to prevent exactly that thing from happening?
A lot of people in Hawaii work 7-3 for exactly the reasons you mention. It is generally not cheap, though, and it is very car dependent.
Honestly looking into his issues, seems like he's getting dealt some bad cards after investing into a city that is letting him down.
These articles make me think that we need EU regulations (I live in EU) which force automakers to implement standards which allow the owner to replace the entertainment unit in the car. This means cars and entertainment units should be decoupled and standardised. There should be a standardized electrical interface between the car and entertainment unit together with protocol used for communication. Also the physical specs should be standard together with automatic tests used to test that car and multimedia unit works as expected.
If you’re learning a language only for money, your studying efforts are probably going to burn out fast.

Most people I know who learned a second language on their own volition did it because they were interested in the country or some cultural element. Or, frankly, had a fetish for the people in that area—that’s an absolutely massive motivator that most people won’t openly state.

One language I learned was motivated simply because I liked the food there. I like traveling in that country, eating new stuff, and looking up recipes in that language to make those dishes authentically at home. Money would be nice. But I have zero plans to get a job speaking that language.
> In 2019 officials at Baltimore-Washington airport found a rocket launcher in the luggage of a Texan man flying home from Kuwait
I don't know about how common it is, but my understanding is that tests for Lyme are fairly unreliable, leading to many people self-diagnosing themselves with Lyme, kind of like we're seeing now with 'long covid'.
> In contrast, I now have a Volvo XC60 which was built in China, and it's the best car I have ever owned - nearly 3 years of ownership, not a single issue, no squeaks, no rattles, interior and panels fit perfectly......

I've got a 2011 V60 (s/wagon, not CUV). It's a bit of an odd duck and I have mixed feelings.

Repairs are exceptionally expensive[1] (I do all my own repairs, so only talking about parts, not labour) but things hardly ever break.

It might be that, the V60 being a luxury car at time of release in 2011, more care was taken with sourcing, assembly and testing.

[1] Compared to other cars that I have owned.
The dark underbelly of Puerto Rico reveals itself much more frequently than the dark underbelly of mainland cities.
Missed opportunity that it isn't serving a React.js page.
Just use gp3, shouldn't be needed to request higher IO with it (except for DBs, probably cheaper to use DynamoDB etc then).
I once had a project manager that didn't do second order thinking at all.

He saw our current state and the finish line. To him there was just one simple step between now and completing the project called "just do all the stuff".

I tried explaining the Coastline Paradox[0] to him but it just didn't stick.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coastline_paradox
It was just a search on loopnet.com. You can do a map search and "remove the boundary" then zoom out.
They do CSV exports and imports so are quite friendly to moving to another option
The GitHub only contains a csv with links to the blog, so it seems to respect Paul's request.
Solo developer startups to $5k MRR
One person is a small audience.

In other words, yes. The original post was about social media. You can chat on social media platforms, but that's not what most people think of.
My partner and I always argue about the map orientation. I prefer to have north on top while driving, to know more or less 'where I am in the world'. For her it is impossible to use like this, map needs to be oriented in the driving direction.
I’ve been able to discover new routes in my area using navigation after a decade.

Case in point: 9 times out of 10 Google Maps will navigate me out of my neighbourhood via a backstreet that crosses a main road.

The suggestion saves a minute or two because you are able to avoid two sets of lights. This route doesn’t seem obvious, because intuition dictates waiting to cross a main road at an uncontrolled intersection will take longer. Miraculously, it doesn’t.
what the bartender can do?

Sell it with a smile! (And enjoy to not bother with lawsuits)
Software fossilizes once it reaches a certain popularity. And while the companies will often add new features they will usually not touch the core functionality, as that is extremely risky. From the perspective of a company with a working software product it's always better to add incremental improvements than to refactor large core features, as most large changes will increase customer churn.

And that's how new incumbents get a chance to disrupt existing solutions: Their risk-reward calculation is vastly different so they can be much bolder when experimenting with core functionality, which sometimes leads to a product experience that is noticeably different (not always better) than existing products. Also, incumbents can use cutting edge technologies to build their products whereas existing solutions are burdened with their "legacy" tech. Newer is not always better but in certain areas (e.g. frontend development) technologies have progressed quite a bit and that gives incumbents an advantage.

Also, the market for software products is still growing very fast as more and more companies start using cloud-based software to organize work, so there's a large influx of customers that have never used any task management software before.
Your comment is flamebait, but I'll respond anyway.

We can get a sense of where people like to live based on where they are leaving and where they are going. Of the five fastest-growing cities in America by absolute numbers, one is governed by a Democrat, one by an Independent, and three by Republicans:

https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2022/fastest-...

Of the top 10 fastest-growing states, 7 out of 10 are governed by Republicans:

https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/slideshows/these-are...
That’s interesting. I always use the GPS for going to destinations I’m unfamiliar with, but I don’t notice this effect at all personally. Perhaps it’s because I tend to intentionally try to navigate without GPS once I have done a route two to four times with the GPS. I guess knowing I want to do that probably puts me in a completely different mindset of actually needing to try to learn the route while the GPS is on (more subconsciously, I don’t tend to make much particular effort), whereas you probably aren’t bothering to do that if you’re expecting to just always use GPS navigation.
Who does better than the “West” at non-elite education then? Surely non-elite must include a lot of people who never go to university. The PISA or TIMMS rankings are about as good a ranking of those as you’re going to get.