skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Are there any keyboard shortcuts to this I'm not finding? Really needs keyboard shortcuts.
Unless I'm misunderstanding, this seems to be writing python extensions in Julia not C. So quite a misleading title.

Also why should I pick this over cython, pythran or numba? with those I don't need to learn how to optimise another language (and no just writing Julia code does not necessarily get you large speed ups and certainly not the speed of C in many cases).

I really wish the Julia community would stop overselling the language.
That's so much worse than actually YouTube though. If I've been watching programming, physics, or history YouTube it absolutely surfaces excellent creators I'd have no other means of discovering.

YouTube isn't Wikipedia. I don't go into it wanting a specific narrow thing. Like how do you even find content you'd like otherwise?
There’s Nothing More Real Than Your Potential
What are the alternatives? Back every store up to a rail line?
https://www.macworld.com/article/673831/how-to-use-an-iphone...
Some time ago I managed to crash the browser with recursive async operations. Didn't save the bug, but it could be useful to kill spam bots. Also read in HN that Cloudflare uses or used deeply nested HTML tables to measure browser processing and detect bots. Some PDF's recursive or expensive operations might have this effect. For example PostScript has decompression functions that could be used to inflate huge streams.

I'm making a next-gen search engine and will work on these anti-bot measures.
You may want to use https://github.com/orijtech/httperroryzer for your CI.
The demo gods have done it again. Wow. I wish they would explain more about how they're managing to blend colors using shade blocks. Because doing that on this scale either requires an extremely advanced knowledge of physics, or the fanatical dedication of a lonely artist.
Silicon Valley's Push into Transportation Has Been a Miserable Failure
A classic: Something called Nothing; Physical Vacuum, What is it? - https://archive.org/details/PodolnySomethingCalledNothing
--- this guy has a video of him pulling the parking break while driving his Ferrari (because they told him to...!) - looks like it's a lever on the dash area --

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzRpo8EjG8Q
YouTube Shorts have the same problem where no matter what, all videos regardless of topic arc towards Jordan Peterson and Joe Rogan. It's deeply frustrating.
Go to private school on financial aid
Jailbreaking iOS doesn’t affect the OS on the Secure Encoave chip. Crypto attestations of device identity can be protected from alteration by jsilbreakers.
FEMA, FCC warn emergency alert system vulnerable to hacking
Depends... sometimes its built specifically to kernels.

One common instance is, blender's Cycles renderer. Every time there is a new NVIDIA GPU. It needs to be recompiled to support it. Sometimes that also requires a new CUDA version to be able to do it. CUDA versions over the years have deprecated different operations and what not.
Thanks for the precision. 1989 was the year the FATF was created.
Strava and Ridewithgps are great for routing bike rides, and derive much of their routing priority from how popular roads and paths are from recorded gps tracks of their users.

Still not perfect, since cycling route quality is ultimately a bit subjective, but far better than Google Maps that makes objectively bad bike route decisions.
A good enough and low hanging fruit solution to spam is an allowed list. Generally allow contacts (initially at least). Track spam feedback by age against contacts.

If someone does end up in a spam list (and they don't rack up a high score across multiple targets), let them know they're in such a list and where to start looking to resolve that issue. A good enough solution for this is to have number carriers attest to have verified the government issued ID of the individual in question; and if spam happens shortly after that to yield the government ID number of that individual.

An alternate form I've considered, for email, is to pay a postage (transfer + storage) micro-transaction fee, and possibly an attention fee for prompt review. The custom might be to refund these in cases of legitimate messages.
Stunning. I don't really have a great pulse on what a 5150 is capable of; when I was born, the world already had 386s. That said, I do have a Tandy luggable that I believe is meant to be compatible, and while it doesn't pass the flight simulator test, it's definitely a good introduction to just how limited these machines really are. You can't expect decent mod playback, unless you're reenigne.

My condolences to emulator authors who emulate CGA. :)
Maui ransomware operation linked to 'Andariel' hackers
Freight is far easier to transport using rail. However, the massive subsidies that road freight receives over other means of transport (i.e. the use of the road infrastructure basically for free, as they don't pay for maintance according to the damage they cause) makes rail financially unattractive in many cases.
It's not clear what 'ultra simple' means. Could have just said that it doesn't handle collisions.

And I think for most cases, you do want to handle collisions.
Localize manufacturing for one.
Getting ready for Twitter?
Tesla dropped radars completely a while ago, their plan is to "solve" everything with cameras ...
I'd say the two big ones are:

- Mature support for async/await since 2012. Yes, Project Loom is coming, a decade later..

- Support for generic-aware value types (struct vs. class) and low-level features like stackalloc: very valuable for high-performance scenarios and native FFI. See for instance https://github.com/ixy-languages/ixy-languages. In comparison, Java doesn't even have unsigned integers. Yes, Project Valhalla is coming someday.

As well, debatable to some folks, but: properties (get/set); operator overloading; LINQ > Java streams; extension methods; default parameters; collection initializers; tuples; nullable reference types; a dozen smaller features
Google’s pricing model didn’t even make sense. Pay for a subscription and then buy the games that will forever be locked on the Stadia service? Why would anyone want to do that. Microsoft was just rolling out Gamepass, why would you not do that in the cloud?
Empty perspective.

That a bicycle is a bicycle only when the parts are assembled in the proper way is an example of emergent phenomena.

Or why you just can’t make a human by blending our ingredients together (they must be painstakingly arranged in just the right order for their effect.)

Whole is greater than the sum of parts.

> there’s no evidence for anything novel.

I feel sad for this perspective. There is so much novelty. Every advancement in thought and form brings prior unfathomed yet useful variations (novelty.) maybe the quest to kill mystery makes the author overlook its subtlety?

The whole point of invention, to enable through novel form and application that which without would be IMPOSSIBLE!

This nihilistic banter of electrons and atoms doesn’t reduce why strawberries or bananas taste good, or the magic of folding paper into a perfect airplane, or any application of intellectual technology upon otherwise ordinary materials.

These don’t defy physics, they are the miracle of complexity bringing us infinite variation of novelty.

Is this all supposed to explain away “god” and “magic”?

I think this article is philosophically attempting to fill a hole in someone’s anticipation of what emergent phenomena is doing for us.

“We” “we” “we”, an amusing thing to see an authors unconvincing inclusivity. These topics meander without coherent purpose.

Universe? Emergent behavior is found in every tiny thing. The Universe isn’t a bunch of stuff, it is the potential of all being manifest into state/form in the moment of now. This in itself is ephemeral and indefinitely restructures itself in ways no systemic computation will ever reveal in a useful way.

Explainability and comprehension are not the same thing. It is the difference between reason and reasons. One is just a story you tell yourself.
> Are there regions of the US which have cell phone signals but no Internet access?

Yes, there are huge swaths of the U.S. that are lightly covered and don’t support Internet applications. I was in Marin County, CA (just north of San Francisco) last year and regularly saw 0 bars of 4g. At those times only SMS got through to friends and family (Messages app falls back to SMS if there is insufficient bandwidth for iMessage).
Soy-Based Asphalt Soon to Be Commercially Available
I'm kind of unclear how the device part is supposed to work. Let's assume the work laptop is fully locked down, and employees' personal laptops are completely compromised with each keystroke sent directly to ransomware rings. Are you supposed to block your employees from logging into your SaaS apps and internal web apps from their personal devices? What's the mechanism for that?
> There are many reasons many IT folks actually prefer an iPhone over Android. The two biggest ones are privacy and security.

I've been downvoted to hell for it before, but I'll add mine to this list because I don't _think_ it's all that uncommon either: I don't want another PC to administer and support.

I've had a lot of Android phones over the years (started with the ADP1!). Taking my last one as an example--it stopped receiving updates way too soon. Once apps started breaking, I ended up updating it by putting LineageOS on it. But then my camera never worked right again because apparently there's a driver issue. One time I updated and my microphone stopped working in phone calls so I had to wipe the thing and install an older OS on it...

You know what that sounds like to me these days? _Work_. That's literally the same sort of stuff I'm doing all friggin' day. Between work and my kid I'm lucky if I've got a couple hours a day to portion out to chores around the acreage and maybe whatever I could do ostensibly for fun. The last thing I want is to be obligated to work more because my damn phone is being a PC and doing PC things.

The fact that it's not customizable, not open, and just generally an appliance _is a feature to me_. My five year old phone is still receiving regular updates. I install them, it keeps working. I can't mess with it (and and up breaking things) even if I want to. I don't have to think about how I want the phone to work because it just works the Apple way and if I don't like it I can just get a different phone. If anything ever does go wrong, I don't need to fix it because I _can't_, reimage the phone if that doesn't work then well you're screwed.

Basically, I treat it the same way I do a toaster. It does what it does, there's a single big knob that makes my options clear. If that knob can't make it do what I want then I either learn to live with it or find another toaster. It's never gonna cook a steak for me, and that's fine. I'd rather not have steak or use another device to cook my steak than shun the toaster and try and pan-fry myself toast every morning.

I pay a premium to get an appliance instead of a PC because I _want_ an appliance. I'm happy I can outsource all the decisions and work and keep the brain space free. Sorry if I'm contributing to the downfall of society and freedom or whatever, but I just don't have the time to do anything else anymore.
The "Garbage Collection" chapter in the OP's recent book Crafting Interpreters goes into this in a bunch more detail (in the context of a language VM): https://craftinginterpreters.com/garbage-collection.html -- so well written, both this and the 2013 blog post.
2022 Small Business Forum Report [pdf]
For the last miles, delivering parcels to people and pallets to commerce, they are for sure. Rail just won't work well at that level of granularity. Between cities is probably another story where rail makes more sense but I'd guess it's much easier to schedule a truck at the last minute and you're not beholden to whoever operates the rail network(s).
Trial and Error, Part 1 – Jerry Neumann
Quite frankly, the only difference between a developer who can understand React and a developer who cannot: one read the doc and the other didn't.
All? It's not a single person picking an enviornmental issue to work on, it's all of us.

What kind of deflection are trying to pass off?
> "it actually does not imply adding a phone number"

It actually does.

The sentence you quoted contains the link "enable 2-factor authentication", which goes to a page where adding a phone number is the FIRST method described.

"There are three methods to choose from: Text message, Authentication app, or Security key..... If you don’t already have a phone number associated with your account, we’ll prompt you to enter it."
I have received a single iMessage spam message in ten years, total. You would have, statistically, received at least 240 false positives in that time assuming current heuristics technology. I don’t think heuristics are the answer if your goal is Project Zero Spam.
Snapchat has this issue too with their discover page
> Is that a result of world power using force? Probably to a significant extent.

Perhaps it’s because 1) what ideologies are widespread in a society is the key factor in determining that society’s prosperity and 2) historically (and to a large extent now) the only way to change ideologies on a large scale in a relatively short time span is refine change (and the often accompanying death, subjugation, and/or displacement of large populations).

There are, of course, many ideas of ways to organize a society such that new ideologies can be proposed, criticized, and implemented (and old ideologies disposed of) without such regime change. Some have even been implemented and are believed by many to be very promising.
On the other extreme there are environments like Rust/Cargo and JS/Node, where you pull the hash table and you get 20 additional packages of untested who-knows-what that nobody asked for and that are recently vectors for malware. Shall we call it 'non-required pseudo-innovative non-effort penalty'?
I think they meant that software is 'what the identity should gain access to', and you 'should not grant that identity access to networks'; it is worded a bit confusingly.
A Tesla Model 3 is about 4200lbs.

Most pickup trucks and midsized SUVs weigh more than this.
“I am concerned that the iMessage on Android would simply serve to remove and obstacle to iPhone families giving their kids Android phones,” Craig Federighi, Apple software senior vice president, wrote in 2013."

They'll find another reason not to implement it on other platforms.
This post is about Google pushing RCS to other platforms. I’m pointing out why their competitor, Apple, has not done the same with RCS’s competitor, iMessage. It’s an apples-to-apples comparison, and I consider it relevant to be mindful of this particular difference when considering RCS.

Google could have implemented crypto-signed device identifier attestation as a mandatory requirement for RCS, which would have given them considerable leverage against iMessage. Why wouldn’t they? What was more important to them than stopping texting spam?
https://www.marines.mil/News/News-Display/Article/1769073/3d...
Looks like the start to some great content.

Some suggestions on the formatting:

- Don't target="_blank" links. Maybe do it for external links, but ideally not even those. You might like everything to open in a new tab, but you can just set your own browser that way if so. For your users/readers, you're often breaking their expected and preferred workflow, and they'll notice that.

- Don't center align text in table cells. You break visual scanning by doing this, one of the key benefits of using tables in the first place.
A makefile
> in my mind you have created a single point of failure for _yourself_

You are offloading decisions to the consumer, decisions that the consumer shouldn't have to take. They should be solved by systems design already.
$2 billion isn't completely out of line. Nvidia annual R&D budget from 2019 onwards averages to like ~$3.5 billion per year (https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/NVDA/nvidia/resear...).

Intel needs to buy talent, make shit loads of mistakes, try as hard as they can to squeeze as much driver optimization as they can in reduce the driver gap as much as possible.
Monero and Zcash are legal.
Content-focused websites -- so it's like Hugo, Jekyll and other static site generators? (the HTMLs are precompiled so we can host just the files)
I don't think he means well. He probably doesn't care about the environment because of selfish reasons but knows you can't use that as an argument, hence the whataboutism
This is not really how smart contracts work. Cardano uses UTXOs for example and is having big problems due to the fundamental limited scalability of UTXO systems as only one account can interact with a certain contract per block as the UTXO can only be modified once. https://builtoncardano.com/blog/concurrency-and-cardano-a-pr...

>The concurrency issue on Cardano is created because each UTxO, and therefore smart contract associated with it, can only be used once. So each smart contract can only produce one transaction per block. Meaning that only one person can interact with a Cardano smart contract each block, meaning that interactions with many DeFi protocols that want to allow multiple users to interact with a smart contract at the same time (concurrently) will not be possible if implemented in their current format.

There are reasons Ethereum and other more programmable systems were implemented as accounts instead of UTXOs.
Use DALL·E 2 with Node.js
> We are currently building a Database-as-a-service platform (tidbcloud.com) using Kubernetes.

I worked for a company that did exactly that (database-as-a-service on k8s); no one in the entire company knew how to run a cluster from scratch. This is a real problem if your developers want to do crazy bizarre advanced stuff like run tests because no one knows how anything fits with anything. At least, I thought it was a real problem as it wrecked any semblance of productivity, but no one else seemed to mind much and thought "it kind-of works on the CI on a good day if the planetary alignments are good" was fine. But hey, VC money so free to piss it all away on a small army of devs being wildly unproductive shrug

Also, the reliability of it all was nothing short of embarrassing, and debugging issues was hard because it was all pretty darn complex. Any technology is fantastic if it works, but I think that's the wrong metric. You need to look at how well things will go for you when it doesn't work – for any reason – because you only set your infrastructure up once, but you will "read" (debug) them countless times.

I hope it works out better for you, but I always felt that the advantages that k8s gave us could have been implemented from scratch significantly better by a few devs working on it for a few months. The other day I spent about an hour writing a shell script (and then spent a bit of time fixing a bug a few days later) to automate a ~15 minute task. k8s kinda felt like that.
> The rail idea is good.

> It's too bad rail is so expensive to make compared to roads.

Is that actually true? I mean, by what measure is rail more expensive? In comparison to rail road travel is massively subsidised. If we break down cost it would be interesting to see how they actually stack up against each other.
> Reusable options like sippy cups

Sippy cup lids like they've got at Starbucks now aren't too bad. Enough height that you get most of the spill control from a flat lid plus a straw. Sometimes I miss drinking from the bottom up, but it's ok enough for me. Certainly better than a paper straw, yuck.
Did you respond to the wrong post?
This is a valid solution - open everything up to the public internet, but gate everything on the domain behind authn (with the application performing authz only if authn is successful). Proxies can also handle the authn part and ensure the app isn't touched without authn, see: https://teams.cloudflare.com/
"the place that you and your children sleep unguarded at night"

Speak for yourself... Maybe I don't have children. Or maybe they are guarded.
Google is very engineering led. From my experience working with software developers, and as a software developer myself, they're really bad at the business aspect of things. They're too idealistic and not practical.

That and their culture of "move fast, fail fast" means they pull the rug just as fast as they lay it out.
The AMD PSP is already an ARM chip in your amd64 CPU.
Good, now buy my Twitter shares at 54.20 so I can move on with my life.
Webflow A/B Testing Pricing page
Im currently a webflow customer and have had to transition to their new workspace concept.

Overall I understand the concept.

What baffles me is how they are executing the transition.

In the middle of it all, with very poor communication, they are conducting A/B tests on the pricing page at checkout BUT explain that they charge would still be the same as the public pricing.

I dont understand how this is a good A/B test if youre just going to charge the same amount?

From Webflow (quoting the link):
Sefket here from the Webflow Support Team. I hope you’re having a great week so far! :blush:

Thank you so much for your message about different pricing being presented on your project’s Billing tab and Check-out modal compared to what is shown on Webflow’s pricing page.

We are aware of these pricing differences as we are currently conducting an A/B test on the check-out page, meaning that some customers may see alternate prices during check-out compared to what is shown on Webflow’s pricing page.

We sometimes conduct these sorts of tests to help us make informed decisions on how to best serve our community as we plan for the future.

I can assure you that these alternate prices are merely part of the test, and your credit card will be charged according to our current pricing as listed on Webflow’s pricing page :arrow_upper_right: 3.

When check-out is completed, a success screen with the actual amount paid will be shown, and you can also navigate to the Billing tab in your project’s settings to further confirm that you have paid the current price.
For any and all pricing changes, Webflow will always communicate directly to our customers.

We apologize for any confusion caused, and I hope you find this information reassuring.

Please let me know if you have any further questions, and I will be happy to continue the conversation.
I don't have the skills for that, but I can't be without some of the Firefox addons, so I have been happy to support by using Firefox and other alternatives.
So a fun thought experiment, we can store information in DNA now.

What if information was stored in our DNA thousands or hundreds of thousands of years ago? Anatomically modern humans have been around a while now.

How would we go about finding it? If you don't even know something is there or what it would look like if it was there, would be able to find it or even understand it?

The information might even present as behavioral instincts, urges or compulsions. The voices people hear in schizophrenia might be a primitive AI asserting itself.

As usual Star Trek explored this concept too:

https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/The_Chase_(episode)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Favorite_Son_(Star_Trek:_Voyag...
There are plans for a 5150 Lego set, but it’s a bit small. You might be able to scale it up with some 3D Lego software and order the pieces you need.

https://www.bricklink.com/v3/studio/design.page?idModel=4450
For someone more curious, I tried to learn more about this tech, and this [1] is the best resource I found about someone explaining how it works.

Essentially VoWifi connects to your ISP via a IPSec VPN using secrets derived using your sim card as a smart card, then connects to a internal SIP server and voila.

I spent a lot of time trying to connect to the IPSec server from a computer, but couldn't figure out how to get the challenge solved by my sim. Gosh I wish I could make normal calls from my computer.

1. https://worthdoingbadly.com/vowifi/
Check out https://liveviewjs.com