skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> That is not my experience at all.

I think we have different experiences then. Or, maybe, your interpretation of 'seeing the awful' is different.

I see 'dumb' people fall for pyramid schemes/MLM which seem obvious to me. They will only see the awful after they've lost money. We both see it, but there's a period where they don't, while I do.

I see people fall for sales tactics and which are transparent to me. Getting a €400 discount on an €800 delivery package for a second hand car that has €150 in actual value, does not seem like a deal to me. Others are very happy and are happy the sales person gave them the fake discount.

When other people are happy that the government reduces taxes on gas due to rising prices, I see rising corporate profits that were paid for with public funding.

When some people get angry about the conspiracy they read on Facebook, I get angry about the manipulation going on that caused that conspiracy to spread.

In the end, in my experience, the 'dumb' people see awful more on the micro level, while I see it more on the macro level. That probably probably makes us just about as unhappy about the stuff that happens around us, just from completely different perspectives.

The only real difference I see, is that I seem to have a harder time finding people to discuss things with than the average person seems to. Where 'dumb people' just seem to be able to repeat talking points and opinions they've heard somewhere, I often prefer more in depth discussions and conversations on the why and how, causing me to be an outsider (sometimes).
JSX is much easier to maintain than pretty much every other templating language.

If you are building a growing design system with any degree of complexity, React is one of the best tools available.
60+ minute jobs are already complex.
You make it sound like there's a large roster of public intellectuals worth listening to. Why lump him in with the Tucker Carlsons of the world?
Thanks for reading. I agree, this article is about the times when things escalated, and I didn’t think I was wrong, or more precisely, didn’t even get to the point where I could be wrong.

When I’m wrong I just say “oh you’re right, good point” and move on. It’s very easy to do.
I think it’s for X400 mapping https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2156. Anyway I have never seen it used in an email. A by seen I mean I just grepped a whole bunch of messages looking for it ;)
Repost of an earlier comment I made, on a different thread:

I think the difference is that an autistic person will see reality like this:

| O O |
| ----- ( inner landscape (fact) ) ----- |
| | | |
| / \ / \ |

While the non-autistic person will see it like this:

| O O |
| ----- ( inner landscape (fact) ) ( inner landscape (fact) ) ----- |
| | | |
| / \ / \ |

The non-autistic person will always assume that there are two inner landscapes at play, in any given social situation, two versions of reality, if you will, and two sets of facts. And they will assume that the other person sees it in the same way: They will assume that the other person also allows for two versions of reality, and two sets of facts.

The autistic person will, instead, view it as if there is one big unified shared reality between him and the other person, and one true fact, in any given situation. He will also assume that the other person sees it in the same way as himself.

The "double empathy problem" is that neither of them can see how the other person views the world. The non-autistic person cannot comprehend that the autistic person sees a single shared reality, and a single fact. Likewise, the autistic person cannot comprehend that the non-autistic person sees two different realities and two sets of facts.
Are you no longer accepting new users?
> Artifex maximus programmanorum? You do you buddy.

At least it points our the absurd arbitrariness of titles in software development.

15 years working on business/safety-critical infrastructure? -> senior engineer

3 months javascript bootcamp, no degree, 2 years of work? -> senior engineer
I recognized his name from providing hosting for the outages.org list[0] – if you haven't subscribed, and you do anything operations at all, go hit the button now.

[0]: https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages
Most will keep failing, the trick is to fail sooner with less money burned.
This is a victory for free speech: lgbt expression does not come at the expense of straight people's expression, and banning homophobia is merely banning violent censorship of lgbt people.

There is a difference between hate speech and calls for violence. "X is awful and you should be ashamed" is not equivalent to "X should be lynched", whether X is members of the queer community or anarcho-capitalists or left-handed people.
I find that trying to write a persuasive essay is a good exercise for clarifying thought. If you share what you write with people who are bound to find flaws in it (e.g. by posting it to HN :)), you start to develop a “voice of the reader” and predict in advance what their objections will be to strengthen your argument.
It seems you're implying that no knowledge is required to be a professor, only a particular methodology. I guess we have different expectations of what a professor is.
Oh awesome, I've always wanted to talk to someone with experience in the global meat industry. Can you answer a few questions?
For me (I also use gas for heating), this would mean an increase of monthly expenses around 5-8% during winter months. (assuming 6x increase in the last winters bills). Though I don't live in an 6 bedroom glass house, so other people mileage may vary.

Though average food/fuel prices have also gone up quite a lot, so the total monthly expenses have gone up more around 20%, which is a lot more closer to actual inflation in my region.
Yup, I got a quote for $30K for heat pump vs. $14K to convert oil to gas.

Also the rebate depends on also insulating your house.. which is a good idea in all cases, but not cheap either.
So you have to build railway lines everywhere. What's the ecological impact of all that? Where's all the concrete for all the bridges going to come from?
Yes, this is precisely why I included it. I wanted to highlight for people who have experience with speech recognition in general that this is a magnitude easier to read than Mozilla's DeepSpeech.
It's not strange when prices are higher in places with high demand and fewer options.
It's easier to imagine a nefarious plan, and to lump everything negative together into one big ball of conspiracy, but it's not reality. Realty is far more complicated than anyone's mental model, and each of the things you describe--the replication crisis, your misunderstanding of 2016 polling, the increased concentration of wealth and power--are separately explained in reality, but each is complicated.

Humans are messy and seek simplicity, which ironically is one of the biggest factors in the replication crisis. One might even think that seeking simple answers to complex question is what has led us to this point right now, in which some of choose to reject even the idea of complex answers, insisting that only simple answers can be trusted.
Do CEOs etc not have to notify in advance when they are planning to sell stock? Or is it just common to avoid allegations of insider trading.
yeah...acephalous organisation. Theoretically possible but perhaps maybe in future practically possible through technology
Did you read the article?

> In 2017, the company confirmed it did slow down some models as they aged, but not to encourage people to upgrade.
It said the lithium-ion batteries in the devices became less capable of supplying peak current demands, as they aged over time.
That could result in an iPhone unexpectedly shutting down to protect its electronic components.
Why do you believe you met a representative cross section of their community?
That's a tricky question... like, if you think Germany (for example) is a really well-run country, is it because of their parliamentary system? Or is it because of German culture, and they would do equally well under a presidential system?

I do think it's revealing that when the US helps a country set up a new government (for example, in Iraq), they set them up with a parliamentary system, and not an American-style presidential one. I once asked a politically-minded friend why that was, and he said it was because parliamentary systems are friendlier to small factions in countries with lots of different ethnic groups.
Great advice, thank you! We have 1 (founder team) and 2 (data scientist), actually looking for 3 to chose the right tools and lead the team to implement them across the stack from front to back to database to operations.
I guess that putting the explorative work of 2 into operations is, again, another position 4? Probably a problem for 2023 ;-)
There's no way to do "the main inflation number" and make everyone happy - because they have to try to find some way to include housing, and that either drags it way up or way down relative to how you "feel".

If all other prices double, but you own or have fixed rent, you're going to feel it but the numbers will be muted; if all prices stay the same but your rent doubles, you're still going to feel it but the numbers will now seem off again.
Even if each person threw only one plastic bag in the Virgin River per year, Zion would suck very soon.

Participating in finance is itself a force multiplier for others to do the same, and with such an energy-hungry practice as finance, that is going to cause worse outcomes. We can't just buy our way out of the problem, because on the whole, the economic activity you generate enables others to help cause worse outcomes (even per-capita, it's a lot of people).
I'm proudly not using Apple products, but I have no sympathy for Google here. Google's first messenger, Google Talk was a robust, cross-platform product which always made sure messages arrived (many others like Skype or MS messenger couldn't get that simple tenet right), didn't require a phone number and could be used from multiple devices. But then there was hangout, now chat, and each new product has been a step back from the previous one. The protracted demise of Hangouts didn't boost confidence in the product strategy either.
> But then again, it's the place that solves everything with "banning"(see knives).

The approach has it's pros and cons. Knife restrictions may have gone too far, but nobody in the UK worries about gun crime, interactions with the police are much less scary, and it's very rare that anybody is killed by the police.

Yes, the most serious criminals can still get hold of guns, but not the low-level thieves, drug dealers, or angry homicidal school kids.
Glasgow is drier than Rome, and on average about 5° cooler at any given time of year.
I bought the cheap black friday rigid from home depot for $49 and have been pleased with it. I have a koi pond and purchased an expensive pond vacuum however. If you live in an area prone to flooding, it's pretty incredible. Instead of shutting off when full, it has a discharge hose. It can run continuously while vacuuming. Meaning it fills up and then empties itself while running. Would be a godsend if you ever experience flooding inside your home. I hope I never have to use it that way.
Mental health diagnoses pretty much only happen when the patient's life is impacted enough to convince the people involved in their life that there's a problem and figuring it out is necessary. If you get good enough grades, have a non-zero amount of friends, have a family and career that accommodates your random foibles, and generally manage your life well, then you can be as textbook mentally ill as you want without ever getting mental health professionals involved in your life.

As a relatively famous example, take Bill Gross, aka the "Bond King". He only realized he had Asperger's in his seventies when it was randomly the topic of a psychiatrist he was having dinner with. And why would he seek out some kind of diagnosis? He's happily married and running fantastically successful bond funds.
While there might be some benefits of an office just as a separate physical space for doing work, I think the vast majority of benefit people are referring to when talking about “the office” is being physically with the people they’re working with.

“Force” doesn’t seem like the right model here, any more than any other aspect of requiring to work for a living counts as force. (Which you might think it does, but singling out just office/remote as the part that’s by force doesn’t seem like it makes sense.)
The Life and Determination of War Correspondent Virginia Cowles
My theory is that overall life happiness is a measure of your reality vs your potential.

If you're smart then you're probably in a field that has infinite opportunities and paths available. If you're not, you've probably landed in the niche that works nicely for you.

The former's potential is near infinite, the latter is pretty damn close to their endgame and happy to repeat till retirement.

Sidebar I dislike the term smart, I make no intentional judgements in this comment in regards to intelligence or lack of in comparison to career choice. I know plenty of people who have been called smart (including myself under protest) who are absolute doofuses outside of their field haha. Smart might as well just mean specialised in something that took more than 4 years to learn.

Even despite trying to be super delicate there.. actual smarts vs not smarts (normal definition) is probably similar. Smart folks have more potential to live up to.
The bigger concern is that some European decisions here are bordering on saying that American companies cannot handle European's data at all, since even if they silo the data to remain only in Europe, if the US Government insists on access the data, the American company pretty much has to give it to them.
I don't understand this sentiment. Taxes are levied to then pay for things such as infrastructure which this qualifies as. How else should this work?
Would you even want to know if other people thought you read these situations incorrectly?
"Can they prosecute you for leaving the state to do something that would be illegal in the home state"

The answer is overwhelmingly "no". It is not legal to gamble in most jurisdictions, but noone is persecuted for going to casino in an area where those are allowed.
I can’t say for certain, but most likely you do personally feel that there should be some limitations on freedom of speech. You might think it should be unlawful to incite violence against someone, or to shout racist slurs at your bus driver, or for your manager to book a daily meeting to talk about how the gays are going to hell. Whatever; it doesn’t matter. There are some likely some scenarios in which you’re going to think “hey, you shouldn’t be able to do that”, where that thing involves expressing some idea.

It would obviously be silly to say this means you “don’t believe in [freedom of speech] at all”. That’s why this sort of “absolutism” argument is a bit weak. The most interesting questions are about balancing the rights of different people - how to we ensure people are free to speak their minds, while trying to protect the rights of others. Simplification to the point of parody doesn’t really help advance that.

There is enough stupid stuff to pick apart in this stupid legislation already and we don’t need to muddy the waters further; it makes me a bit worried to see so many people get tied up the abstraction of freedom of speech while ignoring the practical challenges - like the increasing privatisation of the public sphere.
Let's say that CPI drops even quicker than it went up due to a combo of rate hikes working, demand destruction, and supply chains clearing up. What would the Fed do in that case?
i like it. simple and useful. will be better if have some description or document.
What kind of distance are you talking about in real terms for "the last mile"?

A few hundred miles or so?
> Democracy is the owrst political system, except for all the others

not only objectively impossible to measure but there is no evidence for this. It's Churchillian cliche which has now become a thought-destroying mantra.
Lua’s language server can be nice for detecting unwanted globals. It gives you a warning whenever you declare a global that starts in lowercase, which works nicely if you’re okay with using uppercase globals as a convention
> someone who has a hard time who has a hard time seeing from other people's perspective

You're blaming someone for their disability - this is basically the equivalent of blaming a paraplegic for not being able to walk. Social skills are almost entirely an intellectual process (as opposed to an instinctual process) for many autistic people. It's not like learning to ride a bike (as it is for neurotypical people), it's like learning algebra.

Here are some resources on accepting neurological differences, as opposed to trying to fix them: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/autism/neurodivers...
> I bet you smarter people are better at answering all of the questions you listed.

The article has this paragraph that seems to contradict your position:

> This is exactly the situation we’re in with tests that claim to measure people’s “reasoning” and “problem-solving ability.” Christopher Langan, a guy who can score eye-popping numbers on IQ tests, believes that 9/11 was an inside job meant specifically to distract the public from his theories, and he claims that banks won’t give him a loan because he’s white. John Sununu supposedly has IQ of 176, but he still had to resign from being George H.W. Bush’s chief of staff because he flew to his dentist appointments using military jets. Bobby Fischer is one of the greatest chess players of all time, but he also claimed that Hitler was a good dude, the Holocaust didn’t happen, and "Jews murder Christian children for their blood and they’re doing it even today." Then there's the ever-lengthening list of professors at elite universities who have been disciplined or dismissed for doing things like sexually harassing colleagues and students or completely making up data or hanging out with a known pedophile. These are supposed to be some of the smartest people in the world, endowed with exceptional problem-solving abilities. And yet they’re still unable to solve basic but poorly defined problems like “maintain a basic grip on reality” and “be a good person” and “don't make any life-altering blunders.”

If "smarter people are better at answering" those sorts of questions, why do the allegedly smartest people in the world make such blatantly stupid decisions or hold such obviously wrong, easily proven wrong, beliefs?

> Cursory search on IQ vs marital status confirms that.

What does this mean? What was the result of your search? Did you find higher IQ people are more or often less married? Or more or less often divorced? Is it good to be married? Is it smart to get married? I don't understand.
It seems possible that government attempts to censor that which they think may radicalise the listener, may radicalise some of the constituency.
It's a great platform to build your profile and represents yourself to the world.
I heard about LaunchBar, never suspected it was originator of “launcher” apps. Probably because it has quite modern design.

If you are looking for a new alternative, try Raycast. It’s supposedely better than Alfred, though for my taste it had too many features (same could be said about Alfred).
Ha ha, no. That's where the money is. They have like 90 percent margins on those syrup/water mixes.

...

I like discussions about inflation though because everyone brings up a particular item from their own budget. For instance, have you priced Little Debbie Zebra Cake Rolls lately? Did you even know they exist? It's like a mixture of a Swiss Roll and a Zebra Cake and they are completely awesome and I'm pretty sure the government is ignoring the 50 percent inflation I've been seeing on them lately. I don't know if this is incompetence or reactionary arrogance ("We'll stick with the hexagonal cakes they serve at Quadrangle Club thank you.") but I know the whole program is broken.
1. Can you give some examples for both?

2. Is this different from previous years?

3. Isn't there any criticism from reputable sources of these practices? I'd love to read some articles.
He was the same on Rogan. He has Asperger's and finds it difficult to hold a conversation
Maybe "cheating" isn't a good way to put it. It just seems like you're narrowing the scope of what k8s is often used for, and then calling it simple and easy. It'd be like someone saying: "<language> can be as simple or complex as you want it do be: it's actually really easy to write hello world. You should steer clear for anything more complex than that". Well sure, but that's not a great way to convey it's overall complexity.

But I actually agree with your underlying point. I don't see the benefit or running a db on k8s either. Seems like a lot of extra complexity for little to no benefit.
As others mentioned, heat pump is pricy, especially if you are in an area where you have to go real deep (geothermal) or need gas backup anyway.

Whereas replacing the furnace and AC was a $9k job and there were some rebates for that, too. Electric bill is already down, and gas should be down a bit.
This is the story of all time on my experience. I always see someone working on something just like this.

It always creates a new framework with idiosyncratic development practices that require you to lean the underlying systems to utilize it.

Call me a pessimist, but I doubt the utility of a project like this. Don't get me wrong, it's admirable for trying, but when the rubber meets the road, you're going to need someone who has deep knowledge of each of these platforms to run in production.

Why bother with multy? I'll just write my code so it's easily migrateable between cloud providers, and not use multy.

Sorry for the harsh feedback, but I'm not drinking the Kool aid.
Yes, Apple falls back to an outdated system (on purpose) which nerfs videos. That is not contradictory at all.
I was responding to the parent comment and tried to make clear that I too am against government mandated censorship. I’m talking about platform level censorship because I thought it would be interesting to the discussion to clarify these two different levels. At least in American discourse about tech platforms I often feel these two levels are conflated.
very good point. Perhaps representative democracy was always a perversion of it, a temporary step whilst we developed the communication technology to move past it
Tokarev vs. Simonov: The Struggle to Be Stalin's Darling Designer
Having kids is insanely stressful in the beginning. Your entire life shifts to revolve around them and its utterly exhausting. I could not manage having kids and maintaining friendships at the same time and lost most of my friends due to inaction on my part. As kids get older though for me ~10 years old, they begin to have a lot of autonomy. You see the results of all of your efforts and you realize that everything you have done has contributed to create these small awesome little people with their own thoughts and goals. I have not cried since I was a small child, even when close family died I just shrugged and trudged on. I am for the most part relatively unemotional. My kid came into my room the other day, just smiling and telling me about something and it was suddenly the proudest I have ever been, I almost cried in happiness. It was one of the most surreal things I have ever experienced. I am really looking forward to see what he does next in life and am actually happy about getting to find out.
I'd prefer such a decentralized world, but heck, if Amazon provided such an accurate, detailed, garbage-free view into product categories I might start shopping with Amazon again.
> Which famous philosophers incorporated magical thinking, thought-crime, misogyny and slavery into their philosophy?

Plato, father of most modern philosophy. You have a lot of reading to do my friend.