skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
None of them. The old ones, .com, .org, .de (I'm from Germany) and maybe .info are good enough. Many people out there are irritated if you tell them a Webadressen with one one the new TLD. Some of them don't recognise it as a Webadress. Thats all people who are not so much techies as you and I. Worst case: On some web-sites you can't enter mailadress with a TLD longer than 4 chars. 8-)
The new TLD are just exist to make more money. There is no need. They created a new market to sell more. more than 98% of the traffic for my websites comes with this classic TLDs. The new TLDs are just expensive & useless.
Audio stories & meditations from industry leaders in tech, business, sports, and more.
Applovin..The company you build after watching Superbad while high too many times I guess
> then how do you reason about classes of people?

In my experience: By using a "defensive approach" when formulating such statements. Like "The majority of boomers are very chiefly to blame.", even if you think 99% are responsible.

Yes, this has the "risk" that people who should feel called out are telling themselves "oh, but they don't mean me!". In the end, you probably will never win the hearts and minds of those people anyway with such statements, so it doesn't matter. But you prevent offending and driving away people who are not "guilty", boomers who don't show the behavior you described, who tried to prevent this whole desaster in the 70s and 80s, those that no one listened to, the (at that time) poor. Ostracization is one of our primal fears, our brains are very boolean in that regard and emotions are often not processed with the highest precision.

IMO that's an okay tradeoff and more effective than to only weaken a generalisation with additional statements afterwards. What do you think?

I agree with your text, btw, and am in almost the exact same situation you described except that I live one country to the north-east, have a used laptop instead of a PC and only have to walk 1.5km to get food :)
That can be built trivially using this API. The app stores an identifier, which it knows has not been tampered with because of attestation. Giving apps access to a unique device identifier shared across apps is a privacy leak but can be obtained with the proper scary permission.
Even when fully functional Slack's threading is completely broken for me! Ugh.
This is tragic. Women should have access to abortion, and 23 weeks is plenty, but miscarrying and burying it in the backyard needs an investigation. Just to make sure we have all the facts.
I don't know why your painting Intel as some new entry GPU beginner here, but FYI, Intel had been making and selling integrated GPUs for over 20 years now, to the point they pretty much dominate the GPU market share in sheer numbers (most desktops and laptops, even older Macs, sold in the last 10-15 years are most likely gonna have an Intel chip with integrated graphics, regardless if it's used or not in favor of a discrete GPU).

Sure, their iGPU offerings were never competitive for gaming or complex tasks, but given it came for "free" with your CPU, it was good enough for most businesses and consumers and was a also a major boon during the GPU shortage where gamers who build systems with AMD chips were left unable to use their PC while those who went Intel could at least use their PC for some productivity and entertainment until they could buy a dGPU.

So it's not like they had to start absolutely from scratch here. In fact, Intel's latest integrated GPU architecture, Xe, was so good, it was beating the integrated Vega graphics AMD was shipping till the 6xxx series with RDNA2 in 2022, while also killing the demand for Nvidia's low end dGPUs for desktops (GT 1050) and mobile (MX350). Xe was also the first GPU on the market with AV1 decode support.

So given this, Intel is definitely not a failure in the GPU space, they're definitely doing some things right but they just can't box in the ring with "Ali" yet. Anyone thinking they can leapfrog Radeon and Nvidia at their first attempt would be foolish. Intel should take on the losses on the GPU division for a few more years and push through.
You can have a null pointer handler in C as well.

But this is generally not a good idea. I find software that does not crash early and visibly but instead tries continuing despite an obvious bug very brittle and often causing trouble because it can take a long time before operators notice the problem. If you accumulate enough bugs of this type, you get a mess that "kinda works" but is full of surprises.
Well, Mozilla itself was the result of a failed attempt at a rewrite. Jamie Zawinski decided that being a bar owner was a better career option shortly after that experience.

It’s hard to tell with autodidacts if they really got pissed off about something or just needed an excuse to deep dive into something completely unrelated, and I would definitely peg him as one.
I was going to comment on how less people is the easiest unacceptable single solution to climate change but then I considered the possibility that even if half of the world population disappeared, there's a good chance people will end up using twice as much resources.
"we have no way of knowing" is a much more informative statement than "we have no evidence", but it belies fallibility on the part of the speaker.
I guess it depends on what kind of job at a biotech firm? SRE isnt the same as a data science/ML job...

I did something similar to what you describe ten years ago, finishing a chem phd and pivoting to data science (back when data science was still the coolest job around)

My first job was at a big consulting outfit, they hired me no questions asked. I did do ~ 2 years of high-volume DFT calculations on a computing cluster during the phd. Ensure you have some edge that makes it believable that you can operate a linux box/do scripting, and you'll be fine.

Maybe the market is different now, but if I'm hiring people right now, having completed a STEM-ish PhD seems to signal intelligence and perseverance. Just don't come off as an academic know-it-all. Noone cares if you're right in industry, your shit just has to be delivered on time.
I checked. I have a few alt accounts and all my tweets and interactions are visible when I visit my profile.
Why is it http.Error(w, ...) and not w.Write(http.Error(...))? The latter would be way more clear in showing that nothing magical happens and a return (if wanted) is still necessary (I don't write Go, so I don't know the conventions)
I'm not sure how you can give up the GPU market when Intel aspires to be a performance leader and must have some plan to get back into mobile. They have a GPU with bad drivers right now, but instead of axing the division, it would seem more appropriate to get some folks who know software. The duopoly of NVIDIA and AMD are a lot more vulnerable than other players in other markets Intel could expand into.
I mean in practice what it tends to mean is the logs only had a 3 month ttl so really could be either way. "no evidence" implies there is at least a place there could have been evidence, they looked, and didn't find any, which is a weak but nonzero update towards it having not happened. It would be nice if they clarified exactly what they checked.
This is DMs, most people don't think of those as private, and it's unreasonable to tell people to treat DMs as public. By the same logic email, SMS, voicemail and all "essentially public".
Strong linting helps a lot.

It is much easier for people to accept criticism from an automated linter than a bunch of nit-pick comments from a real person. It also avoids wasting the reviewer's time.

If people disagree on a linting rule, the team can decide together to change it, but it keeps that one person from introducing their personal unique style everywhere.

I'm not saying it is the only thing (unit tests should almost always be included), but linting, as annoying as it can be at first, has been a huge time saver when it comes to code reviews.
Is there a static site generator out there that doesn't require a ridiculous build process every time I do an update?

Inevitably, when a new "hot" SSG comes on the scene, I try it, and then go back to compare it to the old "hot" SSG from 2 years ago. Yet, I can never get the old test site I set up running again without massive annoyances. This has happened multiple times.

As far as I'm concerned, there's zero reason your landing pages and blog should require 3,000 dependencies to run.

And like all SSGs, I see no mention of sane SEO defaults on the homepage. Let me guess--with Astro I'm going to have to set all of this up myself?
> Toyota was one Iirc

The irony runs deep with that tidbit.
The guy is trying to promote lidar tech in every post. He has financial interests. Why this scam is here?
Imagine if the case was against a rapist, child abuser, or insurrectionist.

Because there isn’t a huge difference when it comes to complying with subpoenas.

FB learned a long time ago that defending unpopular criminals’ communications isn’t worth the political cost.
I have not seen any desktop GPU that is competitive with Nvidia or AMD yet. What surprises me is how naive Intel seems to be. It is extremely hard to enter the GPU market right now, so it should expect a lot of years of losses. Hopefully they will continue and fix their drivers and hardware problems so we can have more competition. For Alchemist, if they do not price it extremely aggressively ( like 200$ for a A770 ) they will not get much marketshare, I am afraid.
Is this going to be the thing that gets Elon Musk off the hook for his billion dollar fine for backing out of the deal?

They had a breach and actively actively hid it for an extended period of time. Obviously both sides have good lawyers, but it's hard to see how this doesn't hurt Twitter in regards to the legal battle over the Musk deal unwinding
This is the exact reason why that bit was going around. These corporations are not your friends, they have no obligation to preserve your privacy, and any data you've passed along their servers now belongs to them.

People were told to delete tracking apps to stop giving those companies data. So that data can't be used against you. This girl gave Facebook data. Facebook then turned that data over to the police. That data was used against her. Exactly how people said it would be.
Maybe Musk is right, they are all bots.
Gotta make something out of nothing.
If you're sending data via advertisements, yeah. Otherwise, you want Data Length Extension.
Wasting whose time? Each juror is supposed to decide based on a reasonable doubt, if someone comes in there and says look I think the crime is wrong, and I think this person should Have this verdict, and I’m going to vote that way, if no one goes along with you fine. If they do great, if they don’t, then you have a hung jury. Either way that single person has nullified the verdict. Thus a mistrial.

If anything, the government waste the time of people by bringing cases that should never have been brought to begin with.
I have lived in places where I've had to deal with both and it's the long notice involved with hurricanes that make them worse to me. Tornados are over and done with. There's no prep and the area they cover is small so you're unlikely to be directly effected by them. But with hurricanes there's so much prep to do, shortages to deal with, etc. and even if you don't take a direct hit there's often a ton of clean up and dealing with long power outages, etc.

Tornados are in and out of your life in a blink. Hurricanes you have to live with for weeks or months it feels like.
Reminds me of how certain spam emails will proudly proclaim: This is not spam!
I'm old, I think I got to use VMS in 1984 or 85, VMS 3.x. I had previously used a Honeywell 1640, a Burroughs via punch cards, VM/CMS (I think, some IBM mainframe thing), and a CDC operating systems, NOS or NOS/BE or KRONOS, can't remember.

VMS struck me as laughable even coming from all that nonsensical ugliness. I found it instantly dislikeable.
> Omicron doesn't seem to confer much immunity to re-infection.

Claims without evidence are as solid as intentional misinformation.
To the police they are. Just because everyone is wrong at the same time doesn't make them less wrong.
Who wouldn't leave for more money? What did you expect? Did you give him a counter-offer? Now that you've invested time into him, he should be worth more to you as an employee. Now you get to suck it up and train someone else, and spend hours interviewing replacements. Probably would have been cheaper to match the other offer.
> Intel should double down on its core business which is selling x86 chips for Windows PCs. If it loses to AMD+TSMC here, there's nowhere left to hide. IFS is very long term and a new business opportunity in a market where Intel is not the leader.

The very second someone else but Apple brings a competitive ARM desktop CPU to the market, it's game over for Intel. x86_64 literally cannot compete with modern ARM designs simply because of how much utter garbage from about thirty years worth of history it has accumulated and absolutely needs to support in the future because even the boot process still requires all that crap, whereas ARM was never shy about cutting out stuff and breaking backwards compatibility to stay performant.

The only luck that Intel has at the moment is that Samsung and Qualcomm are dumpster fires - Samsung has enough problems getting a phone to run at a halfway decent performance with their Exynos line and Qualcomm managed to completely botch their exclusive deal with Microsoft [1] (hardly surprising to anyone who has ever had the misfortune to have to work with their crap). A small startup that is not bound by ages of legacy and corporate red tape should be able to complete such a project - Annapurna Labs have proven it's possible to break into the server ARM CPU market well enough to get acquired by Amazon.

[1] https://www.xda-developers.com/qualcomm-exclusivity-deal-mic...
Ethereum is pseudonymous. Society should be used to pseudonymity by now, it's only been decades since everyone had accounts on everything. It's honestly astonishing how badly people are confused about online identity.

(Side remark: Some crypto are in fact actually anonymous. The canonical example is Monero, where sending/receiving addresses, transaction amounts, and address balances are all obfuscated.)
yes, I haven't found an app that doesn't work, but I use less than a hundred of them.
Short term is may seem like a smart move to cut AXG but long term if it’s a must have.

All three AMD, nvidia and Apple are unifying general purpose compute with graphics. That is the direction the world is going. Unless intel had a new arch trick up their sleeves they will be soon made redundant
Sure, they prevent you losing those things if the company loses more money than it has and the creditors want to come after you personally.

They don't prevent you losing those things if you invested your life savings in the company, and you mortgaged your home to invest more. Which are both things that people trying to get companies off the ground do, especially if they don't otherwise have the means to do so.

If you're considering the primary purpose of a UBI as being encouraging entrepreneurship, then sure, they're not that efficient. I do not consider that to be its primary purpose, nor have I yet spoken to anyone who does. It is one of many, many benefits to a UBI that should be considered.
> I’m sure they would happily layer money for non-criminals but nobody does that.

This thread is full of these blind assertions that nobody except criminals wants financial privacy. They are patently false.

> If they did that without checking anyone’s identity and then, after learning—from law enforcement no less—that criminals were using them to launder money, kept going, business as usual, hell yes they’d be shut down and arrested.

You're basically saying that once a service gets used by a criminal, then operating that service becomes illegal because it is furthering criminal acts. This seems like yet another Godelesque everything-is-criminalized result, and your appeal that one can avoid persecution by electing to perform blanket investigation on all one's customers isn't particularly redeeming.

Like sure I get the traditional banking industry has been practically inundated with these type of invasive heavyhanded regulations to make things easier for law enforcement, but that's not a particularly compelling argument.
i'll add to the other comments that usually in theoretical physics we often build lagrangians directly from the symmetries: if you only have terms that are dot products then the lagrangian is invariant under rotations and angular momentum is automatically conserved via noether.

it's an incredibly powerful tool to build theories!
Since apparently Twitter doesn't have the logs, they should be purchasing the hacked dataset and notifying affected accounts.
Doesn't matter much?! Just in the US there were hundreds of thousands of avoidable deaths from not taking the vaccine.
The US Gov could go after you if someone sends tainted coins to a bitcoin address you control, too, and no one knows how the legal arguments for either bitcoin or ethereum are going to shake out until legislation passes or the issues go to the courts.
Apple could easily charge $1/mo or $10/year for iMessage on secured devices, with automatic refund and prorated cancellation if no secured device is signed in within a given billing period; and then discount $1/mo if one or more Apple devices are signed in and active during a given billing period. They'd make a billion dollars a month off of secured Android users, without exposing themselves to any new spam whatsoever, and showing Android users that Apple users have a better experience. Win-win for platform marketing and cloud services revenue.

iMessage spam isn't non-existent because sometimes someone tries to spam, gets a few messages out, and then their device gets console-banned. The iMessage "unsend" feature doesn't yet exist in any released iOS or macOS, so it can't be used to hide the spam after the fact.
Would it? There's always been an open question in the US around whether or not you charge mothers who seek illegal abortions vs the doctors. How have European courts typically sentenced women who sought to terminate pregnancies passed the gestational term limits?
Seems unlikely to me too but that's what I've read. If you ask a lawyer "what are the risks of doing X" they'll give you a list, and some will be more likely than others. It's up to the client to decide what level of risk they're happy with.

I managed to dig up the mailing list thread where I read about this risk: https://groups.google.com/g/linux.debian.vote/c/Nl-J8h2pO9A/... for context, Sam Hartman is a former Debian Project Leader and I assume his opinion is formed by advice from SPI's lawyers.
How would you go about making Kicad more "user friendly"?
that's an obvious lie. FSD beta that he tried detect people very good. It even detect a motion. When a human move a bit towards a car, even there is no direct intersection the car stops. I know that since I drive tesla through manhattan. It stops in every possible case, even the one I will never treat as a problem.
Not sure what kind of tricks this guy made.
They shouldn't have had access to the users private communications to begin with. It's an intentional product choice that they do, and if they chose otherwise they wouldn't have had any private messages to turn over.
Nightshade
There's also no law restricting guides on how to turn any rifle into an automatic machine gun... but Facebook chooses to remove those too.
They Told Their Therapists Everything. Hackers Leaked It All (2021)
Tbh, if there was demand for it we'd probably have them already. I'm afraid the most demand would come from those engineers who create the apps that glue everyone to their glowy screens, and from the sort of parents who have a zero-screens policy (those would be for themselves). Hardly a market that will get any VC excited.
Why do you or Europe get to define late? This was legal until a month ago.
Astro is that tool. It can output a server that can react immediately every time you do an update.
Archive link in case anyone is still having issues: https://archive.ph/HujUg
I lived in a pretty old neighborhood for a while. The type of neighborhood where the trees on the treebanks are over 100 years old, and have grown to be a full canopy over the road. The branches of these trees are big enough to be trunks themselves.

One day I was sitting out on the porch enjoying a nice evening and I heard what I thought was a bunch of kids "squealing" and then jumping into the pool. The only similar sound I'd ever heard was at the end of "adult swim" breaks at the public pools growing up. Turns out it was one of the giant trees dropping a limb onto the road several blocks away - fortunately no one was hurt but some parked cars were totaled.

It's very much one of those sounds you have to experience to really grasp.
This isn't really a good case to build sympathy on. She didn't abort with a doctor's assistance, it was fairly late, and she hid the remains. This would have been illegal across most of the US.
DMCA and similar nonsense got forced to the rest of the world :-(
I can think of 0 reasons why the “police should investigate that”

Why?
And this is even when you visit the post (from someone else) which you reply to while being signed out of your account and your IP address?

Most shadow banning show the posts if visited via the profile but are invisible if viewed as replies to someone else's post or while signed out and using different IP address. Might be worth checking. Not asserting that this is the case with Twitter though.
How is inventing yet another complicated machinery to churn out some HTML and JavaScript innovation?
That's called "misinformation" now. If you disagree, join the club.
The EO is the authority which Treasury is invoking, stated explicitly in the Treasury release.

To rephrase, since Ethereum network, which is an person in the context of the EO, facilitates Tornado Cash's contract, it is "complicit" with the activities as well.
How does the sense of the ridiculous or sarcasm fit into the theory of the brain as a conscious prediction machine? Is a sense of humor necessary with AI?