skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I bet PL/I, Ada, and even Python 3 aren't far off.

Same applies to the Java and .NET ecosystem, because either you swim on the surface, or you really get to know how the implementations, down to bytecode, JIT, GC and standard libraries work, and now they are full speed ahead with 6 month release schedules.
From another HN post shortly before yours: https://twitter.com/msavener/status/1556704891682189313
The usual terminology for this is first-party, retained, and commission recruiting. If a recruiter contacts you, you can always ask if they've been retained exclusively for the search.
I kinda agree with you, but also not. I think a lot of people here are over assuming what the robots can sense and yes, this is that Sci-Fi like reality. But this doesn't mean we should throw the baby out with the bath water. Anyone that has seriously worked with data will tell you how subtle things can reveal a lot of information. Let's look at these robots. Knowing that there are pets and/or children in a house is useful data to sell kids/pet toys and other items. You might think "Amazon already has that info from purchasing history" but a second source builds higher confidence and can differentiate if something was bought for yourself or for a friend. There's also information like how much the roomba fills up. Are you a messy person or very organized? Do you take off your shoes at the door? When you sit down at the couch? At all? Do you make frequent spills or messes in certain rooms? This obviously has selling potential.

You don't need microphones or super sensors. Basic information can do a lot. There's also a lot to be said about redundancy and verification. I think you're over-correcting in your rebuttal. This is the reason data is scary, because it is simple and things you wouldn't think are useful. But they are useful when you have thousands or millions of data points.
PSA for anyone who doesnt know this,

A .300 blackout, will 'fit' into a .223; or 5.56 NATO chamber, AND allow the bolt to go into battery position.

cataclysm results:

https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2018/06/19/lfd-research-...

https://rifleshooter.com/2019/06/kaboom-300-blk-in-5-56-223-...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbfIkaNlECo
Has anyone found a cheaper way to get stereo digital output (than the Port) to replace an old Sonos Connect? I have a nice DAC in my pre-amp, so I’d like to use that with streamed digital audio. My original Connect was very expensive and is now incompatible with newer S2 functionality. I have never understood why Sonos devices costs more without an amplifier or speaker! Presumably because they can?
You can, sort of. With electrochemical machining you can make a barrel at home for under $200 in tooling (plus the 3D printer). Basically you 3d print a mandrel for the rifling, and run copper wiring through the grooves of the mandrel. You then run electrified saltwater through the tubing and it will cut the rifling.

It's stupid simple to do, and the people who have tried it have gotten results comparable to factory barrels. So probably won't win a shooting competition, but definitely good enough.
Do all drugs need to be legalized ?

Maybe there’s a Paretto distribution at play here
Nope. But you can build the crap. you need to ECM a barrel with your 3d printer. Look at what they're doing with JStark (pbuh)'s FGC-9 design over there in myanmar.
Tom Cruise is going to hate zoom calls
> Gas and food prices would likely drop like a stone if we are facing another 2008-like crisis.

Not necessarily. For deflation to occur, especially in staple goods (for which demand is sticky) in addition to stable or contracting money supply (M2) you need significant supply side growth. Neither is certain. I personally doubt that politicians will hold the purse closed at a time when lower and middle income voters are stretched thin. Deflation-causing policies also tend to lower tax revenues.

My bet instead is that crisis or not we will likely see debt deflation via below inflation interest rates. Just a personal position, I do not have a crystal ball.
The paper states it is "incapable of solving ... questions with solutions that require proofs."
Don't reply, response rate is one of their KPIs.
The benefit here, I guess, that you get the advantages of sequential IDs internally? I can't see how this could possibly outweigh the costs of user-visible IDs being different than internal IDs, and transformable only thru a {de,en}cryption process -- requiring all the standard maintenance, key rotation, etc.
No. This would take a very long post to explain why, but in short, it depends heavily on which NVIDIA Cards / CUDA drivers / versions of Linux you're using. Or you're running on AWS GPUs or TPUs and paying a lot more either in the form of straight up dollars or optionality.
I agree that containers suck, but that doesn't make Docker any less of an essential tool to have working well on your OS. I still do Docker work at the end of the day, and on MacOS it's one of the worst experiences around. My 2018 Macbook Pro can't run Docker at under 60c, which is frankly insane when I just need to debug something small. MacOS technically has the underpinnings to allow Docker to work natively, but I'm guessing that Apple doesn't want to re-write a bunch of GPL software just to appease a handful of non-creative prosumers.

> I'd wager that Apple doesn't want to go along with the rest of the world in trying to make people feel better by addressing symptoms of bad practices.

Apple runs their own software in containers, it's completely unfounded to assume that they're taking the high road when they also succumb to these bad practices. In any case, it shouldn't matter how bad the practice is, what matters is how well a Mac can perform regular dev activities. If Apple pushes an update to MacOS that breaks GCC, they have a responsibility to fix it instead of telling everyone to switch to Clang instead. That's just what stable operating systems do.
Ah, let me reframe what I'm saying. This is meant to apply to any task, including getting out of bed and going to the bathroom.

The advice is to break the goal down into the smallest possible pieces and start there. For getting out of bed, I'd probably start with rolling onto my side.

It's not a cure. It's not guaranteed to work. It's a strategy for expending as little energy as possible to get started. If you can focus on one small, actionable item, it can help reduce how overwhelming the entire task feels.

If you don't have the capacity to do something, there is no advice that will make that thing possible and no one should be expecting you to do it.
In terms of this particular tech previous obvious limitation, namely no blinking, worked for something like a quarter from discovery.

Venn diagram of people who someone wants to trick by this particular tech, those who read any security guidelines and those worthy of applying this kind of approach to in the first place is however pretty narrow for the foreseeable future. It's more of a narrative framing device to talk about 'what to do to uncover deepfake video call' as a way to present interesting current tech limitations - not that I particularly mind it.
Agreed regarding the fact that this is, at the moment, not the biggest privacy concern.
Of course, I also believe it should be packaged along with the other concerns, because I would argue that each of these capabilities can be called in security terms:

violations of the principle of least privilege
Strong disagree. If you build a bridge with a safety factor of 0.00001 and people die, it is your fault. The deaths as a result of those actions are predictable.
This is really great. I study a lot by using the answers and the steps taken to reach there.
And how do you manage maintenance like key rotation, etc?
use this https://www.prefabrikbiev.com/
Yeah that's if you want stuff like spotify to work and all the streaming sites.

You can block those from your router and keep it all local and play MP3s if you like (or air play)
"CDKTF uses Typescript types to generate an assembly file that jsii uses to generate the code bindings for the other supported languages."

Yep, sounds like Terraform-level awfulness. Although they actually took the design from AWS CDK, so I guess we can blame AWS for it.
> When invariant violations or mistakes by programmers (aka bugs) are detected, the program should halt as it is in an inconsistent state and continuing could be very dangerous (think privacy/security/data corruption). Otherwise, don't halt (handle it or have the caller handle it).

Well it's not always the case. There are situations in which if you detect errors you want the program to continue running, and have only that particular functionality to fail.

I tend to write resilient code, since I work in embedded systems and what you never want is the system to crash. Halting a CPU on an invariant violation (i.e. and assert failing) is something useful for debugging (you trigger the debugger and you then analyze why it happened), but something you generally don't want in production.

Bette to have a ton of checks more and in case of an invariant violation (that maybe is resulting from a programmer mistake, but there is always the possibility of hardware memory corruption errors) to return an error and handle it in some ways (for example restart the task that returned the error, trying to go back to the last working state).
Some see secops as futile until the tools are here. So we're making those tools instead.
The main difference, in Common Lisp at least, is that push modifies the list to add the new cell. Cons returns a new list with the cell added so the old list remains untouched.

CL-USER> (let ((list (list 1 2 3 4)))
(cons 5 list)
list)
(1 2 3 4)

CL-USER> (let ((list (list 1 2 3 4)))
(push 5 list )
list)
(5 1 2 3 4)
GitLab CI default clone configuration already AFAIK only includes the last 20 commits, so its already slimmed down.
"Today, we do subsidize the cost of overhead of running Web3.Storage..."

So it's free until it's not, like most things.
Haha I read “sanctioned” as in “endorses” and was very, very confused.
Meeting once a week is status for your boss. Standups are supposed to be for the team.

If everyone's communicating and collaborating and effective, suggest trying an iteration without standups. Then compare effectiveness of the two.
Maybe I’m misunderstanding but what you’re describing sounds a lot like a “credit line” to address cash flow issues.

But what Fred is describing is financing to bridge to either a liquidation event or another around of funding.
Cuba still does not have puppet regime installed by USA... So in that sense they did not lose.
Show HN: Footsteps – alternative to torch.save(params, “weightsTues12noaug.tch”)
Agreed. Somewhat mirroring the "Nothing to hide" argument [0] -- just because I'm currently not doing anything illegal, I'm ok with invasion of privacy.

Amazon et al, need data. Even though I can't think off the top of my head, how this data can be monetized, does not mean that someone with a correct incentive has not come up with a way to take advantage and abuse access to that data.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nothing_to_hide_argument
The actual problem with "longevity" research and its funding is that the topic is so broad and vague as to be meaningless. If you want people to live longer then find ways to prevent them from dying prematurely from chronic diseases. The leading causes of death in the USA are heart disease and cancer. So maybe start there.

https://www.heart.org/en/get-involved/ways-to-give

https://www.cancer.org/involved/donate.html
Would this same approach work for you? I haven't looked, but presumably you could pull the signal before it hits the amplifier, and make it work that way...
Asking users to avoid creating fakes of actual people “removes anything remotely fun”? Okay…
Then they shouldn't apply it to questions that require proofs, and then claim that the system solves them when it doesn't.
I don't know why, but I always thought it was cool that the Lambda the Ultimate Papers were sponsored by ARPA. I suppose to some extent because they're basic research not specifically applicable to any defense project, and yet like a fair amount of CS/PL research, they're very practical as well.
It requires a different barrel. As mentioned, lower receiver, bolt carrier, magazines can be reused.
What is currently the best open source toolkit to do TTS with your own voice?
>Too many parties interested in exploiting the lack of privacy are making the lack of privacy laws painfully apparent.

What incentive do they have to change? If anything, this seems to suggest the exact opposite, that privacy will never be codified as a right.
Well the AK doesn't do so well - despite legendary lore saying very much otherwise - once the debris isn't dry sand that can just fall out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DX73uXs3xGU
...and tailgating

Is that a AP/FSD thing? I ask only because just this weekend there was a Tesla on my rear bumper in a 30mph zone, and I had the cruise set to 34mph. I did wonder whether it was the computer, or if the driver was just an ass. Regardless, after a number of miles I grew tired of it, let's give 'em a healthy brake tap. Just enough to get the hint, I don't want anyone spilling coffee on themselves. So I give the brakes a good jab, and immediately back off.

Next thing I know, I hear the tire chirp of ABS kicking in, and I look in the rearview to see the Tesla stopped in the middle of the road. Oops, sorry (not sorry?), not exactly what I was going for. OTOH, maybe you or the car will quit riding people's asses now. And I'll admit I got a good chuckle out of it.
This, and the original article are likely a riff on the Solow paradox from 1987:

> "You can see the computer age everywhere but in the productivity statistics".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Productivity_paradox

It always seemed crazy to me, but as far as I'm aware the invention of computers didn't seem to have a noticeable effect on their economic measures of productivity.
What are your requirements for ethical use?

In what case are you expecting the purchasers to be harmed? It seems reasonable to screen for the other factors as well if a correlation exists.
> I feel like by selling to a company like Amazon that the rug is being pulled out from beneath me. I am truly disappointed in this move and all the people involved.

How so? What promises were made by iRoomba when you bought it about their intent (or not) to sell the company? How is this sale tangibly affecting you?

This feels like a gross overreaction that's typical of online statements to garner as much of a reaction from other readers as possible.
Self-driving cars are a million times harder than this, this is a terrible comparison.

Getting a model to work with images turned sideways is a few lines of code (just turn image sideways at training time).
I want to pay someone to mow my lawn in crypto.

I don’t want to pay them from my primary account with (potentially) millions in crypto visible thus subjecting me to a $5 wrench attack

So instead I have a “payments” hot wallet and use Tornado cash to disburse funds from my cold wallet for paying things while obscuring my total net worth/lifetime transaction history.

This is perfectly legal and moral.

Edit: incase this wasn’t clear the above is purely hypothetical.
The Tesla Model 3/y infotainment system that's often updated by over the air updates isn't "safety critical" code. You can drive the car without the infotainment system and screen even on. There is a completely separate system that goes through a much more rigorous process.

And Tesla has incredible reliability for how complex the software is (in my opinion). They actually fix bugs. I had weird issues with Bluetooth and the radio on my Honda that were never fixed the entire time I've owned the car.

I've seen newer Mustang Mach-Es and Volkswagen iD cars that have really severe issues in their UI.
Believe it or not, I have been paid in the past to write Monkey code. The cross platform aspect of it is clean, the platform/language/sdk is hackable and the syntax without brackets kind of make it special in terms of readability. Got a lot of fun.

Now whenever I see a new language nowdays, I look for Goroutines. No goroutines, no interest. Correct me if im wrong, the fibers arent exactly it are they? Are they yielding on io/sleeps for a starter?
PLEASE look here regarding safety issues:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32389075

it doesnt fit the bore of the barrel, it 'fits' the chamber.

if you are using .300 blackout and .223/5.56 nato be very carefull or do something like colour your rounds with a sharpie

[edit] by the way there are very few dumb questions,
asking a question is far more intelligent than acting like you know it and blundering through it by luck.
The mistake here is believing that whoever has the loudest voice on the Internet best represents the party. The opposite is true, and, of course, the logic doesn't work anyways: it's always easier to be louder than it is to be persuasive. It's a strange thing to admit that you're willing to concede your personal understanding of some issue to whoever says the loudest, dumbest things about it.

It cuts both ways! We have a two-party system in the US for almost mathematical reasons, and both sides have tons of incentive to play at a politics of disqualification. There are sane, fundamental differences of policy opinion between Democrats and Republicans that have nothing do with eldritch hierarchies of grievance or unhinged conspiracy theories; the R's and D's have different preferred solutions to important problems everyone agrees exist, and neither party can claim always to have the best answers. Democrats who don't want to confront the difficult issues of, say, out-of-control public sector unions and unsustainable pension liability would much rather cast Republicans as the party of attempted coups. We need level-headed, persuasive, rational Republicans and Democrats so we can work out the real policy issues, and get the approaches of both parties on the table.

But in this thread, I'm not attempting to DQ Republicans; I'm saying that there's no win to have from DQ'ing either party.

Rayiner can't say the same thing; he's --- for reasons I don't totally understand --- abandoned that principle, because he believes the Democratic party is dedicated to a mission of creating a new American caste system. In that, he shares the faults of Democrats who, for instance, believe that if we can just raise enough money we can pull Clarence Thomas off the court. Those people are unserious. But it's fun to pretend they're not, so, here we are.

There's a trivially easy way out of this mess for him. He could just confine his critique to the far-left wing of the Democratic party. I'd even give it to him if he chose the term "progressive" as a shorthand for it. But to do so would be to surrender the disqualification card he's time and again trying to play on the entire Democratic party. Someday soon I'll probably slip up and do the same thing with the Republicans, and when that happens, I hope he calls me out too (maybe less indulgently and with fewer words than I'm burning on this).
I'm just worried that we are losing another browser engine.
Because it is based on linear types, not affine types.

With affine types, like Rust, you can use a type zero or one times, with linear types you must use it exactly once.

So not calling free() as per all possible dataflow analysis, would be a compilation error.

By the way, this is the approach adopted by Haskell with Linear Haskell extensions.
fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.
Is the reason for the value based the good usability, the user base or the content that is existing?
I wonder as I am leading a content platform and was asked to think if we should sell it, but totally inexperienced in this.
> I suspect it's the same reason why Microsoft just doesn't sell a version of Windows without telemetry for a flat rate: there is just too much money on the table for tracking and selling your private data over the lifetime of the vehicle (or computer).

Do Windows Enterprise and Windows Server machines include telemetry? I would assume "no", in which case there you go.
I wish everyone was on Bandcamp. It's such a great service. It's so flexible. And unlike Qobuz, it's website is actually decent.
Smart Knee Replacement
I loved the Avantime, never had one, but wanted to one day. Top gear or grand tour (don't remember which one) really destroyed it in one of their show, so maybe it's for the best that I never wasted the money.
They aren’t trying, they can’t afford to keep it alive. No one wants to work somewhere like that.
Ask HN: What unexpectedly good book have you read?
An example would be you have the right of keeping your bank account activity shielded (private) from the government by default. But, if you are participating in human trafficking you lose that right (it's not absolute) and the government can go in to track your activity to prevent further human abuse.

Of course, this is an easy example with an obvious right/wrong. In the real world situations are all over the place, so our goal should be to constantly strive to
find a more perfect balance.
But Tesla didn't see the consequences, yet.
If we ignore the fossil record: Def something with mining and colonialism, like those strange holes in the desert: https://youtu.be/twAP3buj9Og
Covid Sewage Surveillance Labs Join the Hunt for Monkeypox
We can't talk about a point being valid or otherwise if it is not clear. Saying vague statements such as 'but they predicted X and it didn't happen ...' is nearly useless when it comes to understanding and predicting X.
> Google was in negotiations to buy Tesla

Did that happen? I thought that was just a private thing between Musk and Brin.

> Tesla's still have problems. They made up 273 accidents involving driver-assistance systems in 2021. 70% of all such accidents.

Is that broken down anywhere in terms of actual miles, and even more importantly high way miles compared to non high way miles.
Great question. We don't support audio (including TalkBack) at the moment. But it's very high on our roadmap.

For iOS, we plan to support similar features and we will explore if we can use the Accessibility Inspector tool to support VoiceOver.
How did it start in your case?
This looks like someone decompiling Apple's code and basically putting output of that into their project.

This method can have some legal risk attached to it (INAL).
> But vegan meat is tech. 3-5 years down the road it might be the more affordable option.

Just like margarine.

> Imagine burger chains offering you the same two burgers. You can't taste the difference but one is 50c cheaper and healthier.

Key word: imagine, as in fantasy.

Honestly, I don't really see that happening, except at the very low end (e.g. swapping out a crap-quality McDonald's beef patty with some plant thing to save a nickle, but I'm not sure if even that would make any sense. IIRC, most of McDonald's beef comes from used-up diary cows (e.g. waste from other processes).
> But no, Tesla isn't storing our driving history. At least not deliberately, and certainly with no intent to use it or provide it.

Strong James Clapper vibes.

Wyden: "Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions, or hundreds of millions of Americans?"

Clapper: "No, sir."

Wyden: "It does not?"

Clapper: "Not wittingly. There are cases where they could inadvertently, perhaps, collect, but not wittingly."
That's similar to factoring, where you're borrowing against your inventory. Common in apparel.
As long as Google is the hand that feeds Mozilla, don't expect Mozilla to try anything too rebellious.
The solution you propose sounds vastly overengineered. Why would we need remote attestation, tampering resistance and enclaves when this is simply a problem of your peers being unauthenticated?

If you care about the identity of who you are speaking to remotely, the only solution is to cryptographically verify the other end, which just requires plain old key distribution and verification. It's just not widespread enough today for videocalls because up to now, there wasn't much need for this.