skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sorry I missed this. You are absolutely right. I personally am a child of abuse, and I have a lot of mixed reflections on it too. Things like, would I really be who I was if I wasn't in that family, etc. And I think all of us learn to deal with the situation were are given (well, or if we don't, it seems like a pretty fast decline into maybe suicide, depression, drug abuse, etc).

Now, all that being said, just because you may have a complex relationship with your abuser or your memories of the place or what happened, that doesn't make it any less wrong or more right.

What really amazes me is that there are so many "poor" people in the world that really honestly live a great happy life, even though by American standards it might be not only considered poverty but injustice. Things that really seem to add to happiness are things like strong community, strong family ties, etc. But again, just because you are one part of the survivor bias doesn't change the moral problem with the original situation in my opinion.

But to cycle back to the mixed reflections - people are stupidly complex and beautifully wonderfully diverse and brilliant in their own way. Some people (mostly in debates) try to argue "who would decide to knowingly believe a lie?", "who would do something so illogical?" but not only does it happen, it's probably the norm. My family is all still together, driving each other crazy into a cycle of codependence, which makes no sense, but doesn't make the abuse that goes on right. If anything, that complexity only make sit more dangerous.
Yes, I'd be fine with that too. As long as there's zero functionality lost by the central servers being turned off, I don't care how it's done.
Not sure who you are but I'm absolutely sure that very few who made contributions to the transhumanist community did so through "pushing the boundaries of science and engineering". https://web.archive.org/web/20050510004128/http://www.singin...

> Singularity activists can engage in a variety of productive roles related to advancing the Singularity Institute, roles that are just as necessary and critical as the researchers' roles. These include becoming donors, publicists, organizers, speakers, writers, graphic artists, grant writers, networkers and fundraisers.

Thiel became a major donor and co-hosted a summit not long after this call to action. The participation was extraordinary for having been during the "AI Winter", and it became a yearly event for some time. Major investments eventually started pouring into AI/ML tech.

https://news.stanford.edu/news/2006/april26/sin-042606.html
Interesting that YouTube isn’t listed, unless I just missed them.
thank you very much. I'm always reluctant to read/watch any git tutorial, I think that will help me a lot!
Data Driven Development for Stream Processing
Great job. If my car had that instrument panel - and I'd love to have it - then it'd look like a cockpit :-). Amazing stuff.
Congratulations, you have independently discovered what is called unschooling, a form of homeschooling, which is itself a form of self-directed learning. The closest you can get in a formal school is Montessori. See Ivan Illich’s book Deschooling Society, anything by John Holt, John Taylor Gatto, Grace Llewellyn.

Wikipedia is a decent resource but I wouldn’t base an entire education on it.
The petulant comment probably he was afraid of burning Karma on, is my guess.
This is the "exception that disproves the rule" fallacy. It's like going back to 16th century America and finding the one black guy who isn't a slave, or the one white guy who is, and claiming that black slavery wasn't really a thing, just slavery itself as a general thing.
>> a journey to the water in New York will take much much longer, involve more walking, and involve dirtier water

It's not hard, not far to reach.
This is what I know; wish I knew more.

AES won due to software performance.

https://www.moserware.com/2009/09/stick-figure-guide-to-adva...
They make mention of Overwatch towards the end - that's sort of happening later this year. Blizzard has stated that when Overwatch 2 is released, Overwatch 1 will no longer be accessible.

The do say that "player unlocked content will transfer over" but you'll lose the game dynamics of the first game forever...

Edit - grammar
That (obvious) strategy would have never occurred to me. I's make a terrible criminal (or pentester).
Where would you digitally sure a JPEG that's not a database? A file system is a database. I guess arguably it's a record if its in a non file-specific database?
Do you mean a TA? I've done some TA'ing work, yes, but mostly marking and invigilating.
Turns out the website is offering prerecorded sounds instead, not really cancelling anything.

Kind of. Not full prerecorded like you'd get in a long audio track, but generators instead with multiple tracks each based on samples. This offers a huge range of customization ability, but also allows the amazing 'animate' feature that allows a constantly changing background.

In the app if you tap where it says 'Default' on a sound you can also choose other preset 'scenes' using the same generators which can be very different - for example the Folk Trad sound set, which has scenes for Breathing Pipe, Calm Blow, Circular Breath, Harmony, Haunting Flutes, Highlander, The Drone and Throat Pipes.
RTW8852 based wifi, sure. You can get Linux preinstalled, and with full support from some places. I highly recommend doing that if you're going to run Linux. They'll not have that chip though. They'll have one that works.
Vertical space is at a premium, no sense in having lines with nothing but a single close paren. You don't want to drag down the formula bar and start hearing the Star Wars title crawl music in your head.

It's worth checking out the big alphabetical list of formulae, there's a lot of things that many people don't know are there. Look at the ones with the "Office 365" or "2019" labels for recently added ones (although annoyingly those are icons rather than text so you can't ctrl-f):

https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/excel-functions-a...

Also check out my other comment in this thread about tables if you don't already know what those are all about. And Powerquery too.
You can disagree all you want, Twitter made it clear its bot number could be wildly off. It never lied and the SEC understands that (unlike you).

Buying into Elon Musk’s bullshit is a gigantic waste of time.
New Flow Language Rule: Constrained Writes
That appears to be a "noise canceling" microphone adapter. It doesn't even claim to offer headphone noise canceling, it's just for microphones. There are two dots that might possibly be microphones for active noise cancellation, but I suspect that they would be too far away from your face to be effective. Most likely there is just a DSP inside that tries to filter out background noise heuristically.
There is not that much ambiguity in practice when realistically consumers never fully purchase any (digital) media. So its always licensing. Only exceptions that come to mind are commissioned work, but then the ownership status should be pretty clear.
It's not a floppy, it's a Zip100!
Accounting records are going to be subpoenaed eventually if this keeps up.
_Context: I do front-end and back-end, so I'm usually the one who ends up maintaining the GraphQL server_.

The vast majority of people who've used GraphQL haven't used it with something like Relay; and in my mind that means they haven't used GraphQL in a way that really shows off its strengths. This isn't to say that GraphQL doesn't have any benefits without Relay, but rather that the cost/benefit scale only really tip heavily towards benefits if you're using it to solve the problems it was intended to solve -- that of reliably getting a component's data dependencies into the component.

Every time I use GraphQL without Relay I find myself questioning whether it's adding anything except complexity, every time I use Relay (other than the initial architecture build, on-ramp is steep) it feels great. Relay's learning curve and poor documentation is really unfortunate, because the difference is quite pronounced.
I'm not that poster but their post is valid
All that matters, against musk, is that however twitter claimed to count it's users was infact, how they counted.

Musk wanted to invent some means to count users in an effort to demonstrate fraud. But that's not fraud. Just because musk provides an alternate means to count users, doesn't demonstrate fraud.

Full stop. Unless he proves that they didn't count the way they claim, he has not claim. Waiving he due diligence clause is what makes his claims a non issue.
It's common hacker news trope for someone to do acronym diarrhea, even with rarely or never used abbreviations. It's quite annoying.
Not sure what do you want to prove with that anecdotal point. I've seen coworkers spend a month or 2 with both their new and old mac or windows laptops because they weren't seeing the end of migrating their stuff from one computer to another and setting up their dev environment.

Some people are just bad at this.
Can we not flog this dead horse?
Thanks, it's nice not to have to link somewhere deep into the thread to support the point I just made.
Having spent several years working with GraphQL (using it in multiple projects and teaching it to others), I've found that in the majority of cases just doing a plain JSON-RPC API is preferable and far easier to reason about for all skill levels.

When I built Joystick [1], this is why I implemented the API system [2] as a JSON-RPC model, but stole the idea of validating inputs (optionally) and then on the client, optionally specifying tailored output (also optional—like how you can request specific fields back in GraphQL but instead of a custom query language, just pass an array of paths like ['customers.creditCard.expirationMonth', 'customers.creditCard.expirationYear'] for the specific data you want returned).

What I learned implementing that is that the typing/querying for specific fields ideas is brilliant, but much better when it's flexible (i.e., I want it sometimes but not all the time).

[1] https://github.com/cheatcode/joystick

[2] https://github.com/cheatcode/joystick#api-1
Madison has a great small business community in general. I am always really impressed by the number of small, independent establishments of good quality when I go.
Somehow I thought OPAQUE had some important change that made it practical compared to previous variants, but now I can't find what that would be or why I thought that, so yeah, the reference to the date is indeed irrelevant I think.
SELinux is way more complex than security levels sounds here.
How are they "still" files? The never have been files. They are some value that is part of the HTTP header. No one would call the HSTS value a text file, even though it's a string of printable bytes in the HTTP header that is stored somewhere on the hard drive by the browser, just like a cookie.
Assumption based on the username "EmilyHughes". Otherwise I would have used they/them or maybe a he/him would've slipped through, though I try to avoid that.
> I think David Sinclair's track record of actually producing meaningful improvements in human longevity is zero.

I know it’s not a great counterpoint but how does he look so young for being in his 50s? He must be doing something that works.
Because not everyone gets it.
The concept of non-negotiable or required skills seems wrong. I unschooled my three children, which meant letting them choose what to study and when. They all learned to read early on and managed to get enough education to function in the world, including going to college if they chose to do that. Children naturally exhibit lots of curiosity, you probably don’t need to force subjects on them.

Homeschooling with a rigid curriculum, something I associate with religious homeschoolers and parents trying to protect their children from the “real world” while simulating the classroom at home, seems like the wrong approach to me.
Nix is an abstraction around `tar -xf && make && make install`. In fact, those commands are even executed by nix, just in a sterile reproducible environment.

What sets nix apart from other package managers is that you are never running `make install` on your root filesystem, but `make` can still dynamically link to libraries (that also aren't installed on the root filesystem) without editing the Makefile directly to find them.

This way, you can't break existing packages, you can trivially roll back changes (because updates are new instances), and you can always start over fresh.

The only problem is that you have to wrap every package in a derivation, then publish that derivation somewhere. Right now, all derivations are tracked in a single git repo (with dozens of branches), all coordinated over GitHub Issues, and referenced by nix itself by an arbitrary (versionless) name in a global namespace in this file: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/top-level/...

That last bit can be avoided by using pinning and flakes, but it's still the default way to use nixpkgs, and documentation doesn't clarify much or offer a better consistent UX paradigm.
But cost about forty bazillion man-hours from people inserting the cables the wrong way.
This is one of the strengths of gRPC, it forces and centralizes the (mostly type safe) API design from the get-go.

Also tends to use a lot less bandwidth.
First, you should not conflate the locale of the user or program with the locale of the (span in the) file.

Second, how would you handle international addresses? For many businesses, a program that can't do that would be useless.
> We're 7 billion different people!

Consider that it might in fact be harder to get 7 billion different people to do one thing than having them do 7 billion different things.

If we can't manage to exist in balance with this perfectly fine planet we evolved on, what makes you think we are even prepared in the slightest to do so with a new planet which would very likely be the equivalent of playing earth in hardcore mode?

I also think we should fix earth and explore the rest of the universe at the same time. But as of now we are doing a really, really shit job of doing the former, so maybe we should focus there first. Why, you might ask? Cause the negative impact of fucking that one up has a headcount of 7 billion + future generations.
Also I believe there should be some minimum time from last sale that these services are available. Let's be reasonable and say 3 years.
> They might tell me that "it's legal isn't a counterargument," but actually, it is.

The difference here is that this is a category argument, that is to say it's an argument about what is, whereas the argument about legality is about what should be. Arguments about what is vs arguments about what ought to be are very different things.

Additionally, murder generally has a component of crime associated with it, this is why other forms of killing that are government sanctioned also generally don't fall into this category (e.g. killing during war and government sanctioned executions are generally not murder). The legal status is a fairly decent argument that it belongs in a different category, unless you want to invoke natural law.

But, we should note, that the harvesting of meat is currently legal is a terrible counter argument to an argument that it should be illegal. The current legal status of something is immaterial to an argument about what it should be. If it were a good counter argument, we'd never be able to criminalize anything and we'd never be able to legalize anything that was currently illegal. This is, I suppose, fine if you consider every law to be timelessly perfect, and the system of laws to be complete and never need changing. However, I've never met anyone who believes such a thing.

> Should that suddenly be legal, due to their motivation? I don't think so, personally.

You find the argument, personally, unconvincing. That's fine, and a perfectly legitimate position to take. I also assume it's the majority position within society. But, it doesn't make current conditions relevant to a conversations about how they ought to be.
The issue isn't just that the publishers don't preserve the games themselves. The issue is that they go out of their way to do things to make it harder/impossible for anyone else to do so either.
He should try putting OSX on the hardware. Wouldn't even start to work.

Clearly OSX is not ready for the desktop yet.
The biggest thing is exercise. At least an hour a day. Mostly low impact.

Being social is also huge.
"Significant reduction of energy consumption" is only a possible answer if you're able and prepared to suppress the lifestyles of billions of people through any means necessary.
Do you not think that historical writing is a tool of the state or, as I prefer to call it, the governance system? (I think the state is also a part of the governance system, a red v blue puppet show.)

I hesitate to mention this, but here is an overt example of state management. You know it is a criminal offence to discuss certain events in World War 2 in many countries, including Germany and Canada? I use this as an example to illustrate that honest analysis of history is not possible if there is no freedom of speech. If potentially important information is unavailable, we are being 'guardrailed' - only certain authorised lines of thought can occur. History is not a naturally unfolding cronicle of reality.

For the masses, it is even more simple - just manage what is on the school syllabus and they will never know. But, they will believe what they are taught is true as it is presented unambiguously, rather than a provided narrative - we agree on this. This is intentional - the main value of history is that it is accepted as truth. History is what is expedient for the masses to believe in the present. Only sanctioned historians can alter it.

Also, do you realise that professional historians typically live their entire lives beholden to the state for their livelihoods? Could you risk biting the hand that feeds you?

So, I think it is quite possible that the historians believe they are being honest and well-intentioned AND also be supportive of the governance structure. Their education will provide them with a clear but narrow sense of what is acceptable. They will know when they are flying close to the wire or over-stepping the line.

I don't think this is a history specific issue btw. I think all education serves a role, though most people are unaware of how they are guided through their lives. So science, history, economics, technology, etc, etc have all been bent to serve a purpose that is not in our interests. We can pretend it isn't so if we like... but the evidence is there when we look.
> It runs circles around the docker in everything except how much it was adapted by community.

...except?

Meh. People who want to engage in this argument are generally trying to argue about jails vs. the collection of linux container technologies. That's not Docker. Docker won because of Dockerfiles. Docker isn't, at its core, an interesting container technology. Docker is a simple metaphor and programming environment to leverage container technology to solve practical[1] problems.

And as it happened, it was done on Linux and not jails, owing in large part to the more configurable/toolkit-style/policy-free tools available there. Jails were indeed more mature, but they were solving the wrong problem.

[1] Also thorny, boring problems like configuration management of large apps developed piecewise from components and by large teams. The kind of thing that is historically not well served by the operating system, BSD included.
Hey I always have clear facts and reasoning backing up my policy claims. Lies are too hard to maintain, and they're fragile.
Show HN: The Philhartronia Orchestra
Because they either fork their processes so the running task is it’s own process (which is how classic shells, like Bash, work) or they capture ^c and interpret it to behave like the classic shells do because that’s the behaviour people expect from shells.

You have to remember that Bash isn’t a language like Python in the sense that it’s core libraries are built into the Python runtime. in classic shells like bash literally every command is an executable. Granted they’ll ship some “builtins” but they’re still invoked via fork() to behave like external commands. So literally every ‘if’, ‘echo’ and ‘for’ (etc) has its own process ID in Linux/UNIX. Thus you can ‘kill’ an ‘echo’.
Interactive Sierpinski Triangles (2017)
I don't necessarily agree with this comment, but I do agree that it's sad this is getting downvotes. The comment is thoughtful and I learned something from it.
I support building more reactors but I don't support reflexively shouting down commenters which take the opposite stance.
Being vegan is holy? Which religion?
I have made well over 10k betting against them in absurd bets where the odds of trump becoming president months after the election were estimated by them to be much higher than any rational person would think them to be.

I also spend a decent amount of time looking at qanon websites/forums/reading their insane chatter on twitter.

What do you think the odds of Biden being a body double clone are? Many of them think the odds of this are well over 50%.
No problem. At the time, Visual C++ lacked several important OCX controls that were included with VB, so they had to be hand-coded.

If you were building an application that does little more than populate forms with data from a database and then update the database, VB was totally adequate. The most important part of the job was the DB and query design.
It's very common for aftermarket exhaust headers to be a spaghetti of equal length curved tubes into a collector for better flow. Lots of videos on this discussing specific engine types and goals. I'm assuming Acura are taking this approach further down the exhaust system as well?
I’m guessing the OP meant “where glibc is really horrible”, since bsd libc is rather more abi stable, largely because that’s where FreeBSD provides compatibility instead of the syscall layer. This is not to say you can’t use an old libc and fix up the loader paths or use a container and make it work, but it’s a different set of challenges.
You haven't actually described any of the unique parts of GraphQL though. Generating a typesafe API whose schema is defined in a single place is trivial with an OpenApi spec and a client generator

What I've noticed is people get their first taste of a type safe api and automatic client creation via GraphQL and don't understand that exists without it.
Don't say no. But don't say yes. Feature requests can live in the issue tracker indefinitely, they aren't an obligation on your part.

If someone is insistent, ask if they're interested in submitting a PR. Or if they're interested in paying for that feature to be developed. If it's small, this is a good way to get some of your amazon wishlist items filled.

If they're being inappropriate, just block them like any other troll on the internet.

If the feature is genuinely something that doesn't make sense for the project, mark it as wontfix and briefly explain why you think it's out of scope. If you're feeling generous, mention some other solution that might solve their problem.

Don't take it personally. It's just some rando on the internet.
Oh, good point. OP was looking for original source, papers referring to, etc. Too late to edit, but minus points for me for not comprehending the original question.
Louis Rossmann did a great video on this.

https://youtu.be/Rufif247scI