skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There are all sorts of different ideas about why Europe developed before the rest of the world- maybe it was because of the scientific method, maybe it was finance capitalism, maybe it was wealth looted from other countries. But I’ve never heard it attributed to a “growth mindset”, whatever that means. That sounds like magical thinking, honestly.
Because this is an issue with 99% of the companies.

Don't forget you are here on HN with HN developers. 99% of companies will never seek support contract with vendors. That's the reality, developers have to deal with it and get over the struggle. Maintainer have to deal with it too because companies will never change (or at least not in the few months) and get over developers asking for help which have issues with their library.
Expensive perhaps, but not that expensive. Difficult? It’s in every Kroger which is the largest grocer in the USA (afaicr), and it’s also in every Walmart. There’s a lot of beef and a lot of grass fed beef in the USA. If America simply stopped wasting so much food it would likely lower prices enough to make higher quality foods more affordable.
I do know what concepts map to it, I understand all common monads (including IO) as well as monad transformers. I think ZIO style monads (combined reader, error and effect monad) are pretty awesome for building backend apps, especially the reader bit which solves the common "contextual data" problem typically solved by threadlocalstorage or CLS or OOP in other languages

I still find "monad" as a concept underwhelming and meaningless. I can put `flatMap` and `wrap` on a lot of things but that won't make them interesting or useful. The individual use cases are interesting, the concept isn't - seems like an unnecessary overgeneralization.
It is a strange choice, all right. I had some fun with Wombo, and this looks much more interesting - but I'm not going to go figure out Discord, and potentially have to deal with a bunch of crazy gamer kids, just to try it.

Presumably they will make a better interface available as they shift from early testing to productization.
Early game companies such as Atari had policies:

https://www.ranker.com/list/first-video-game-easter-egg-atar...

The industry grew out of that.

Furthermore, Hollywood is all about having your name in lights. Code isn't and it attracts people that do not expect to have their name in big letters.

It's culture.
I didn’t know one could still refer to the value before aggregation after it is aliased.

Is there an implicit group by in this query?
Losing a bomb is pretty easy. It just requires a convergence of mistakes. Laundering it requires you make those mistakes happen and avoid anyone finding out you did it.

I’d go with lost.
I work as an infra architect at an MSP, so mostly Teams calls and Visio (sometimes even MS Whiteboard).
and heavy web browsing.
Just make a perfect api without any drawbacks.
Let's cherish the time until building operators realize that elevators are a good place to play ads.
Would assume stolen by Russia or China… espionage to reverse engineer our tech to see if they could find flaws or exploits to reduce its effectiveness, or ideas to improve their own designs.

Makes me feel safer anyway since the bomb would be out of commission.

So these bombs, if found, they aren’t just pull the pin and chuck it to detonate, right? would they even pose a risk of found by a civilian?
I really doubt whether this will live up to the lofty promises.

Open software is really something very different from open chip architecture. We're still not able to actually verify that what we get does not contain any backdoors. Unless we have an electron microscope in our basement. Either way we will need a trusted manufacturing party that doesn't incorporate any backdoors like intel's ME. AMD and ARM CPUs have the same thing. I"m sure RISC-V will get the same due to pressure from governments, content providers that want DRM etc.

The main target community seems to be the Chinese manufacturers as they want to have more independence from sanctions.

I'd love to be wrong and for RISC-V sprout an entire ecosystem of really 'free as in speech' hardware under the user's control but I don't see it happening.
The Rauscher maximum force is new to me, and all I find in a quick Google is the same author here. Other things about this paper don't seem right to me. Is he over interpreting something, or am I missing it?
Sometimes they are. Activision was created, at least in part, because Atari refused to give creators credit. EA originally featured the creators prominently https://www.gamedeveloper.com/business/we-see-farther---a-hi...

In the 90s there was, famously Daikatana's "John Romero is going to make you his bitch" ad. American McGee's Alice is another.

Currently, it seems like Japanese creators are the most known and in the West it seems more like studios are known. And in announcements they will use the creators and companies to get buzz.

However, that isn't really marketing. In film, for example, Nope was advertised as a Jordan Peele film. Most games aren't advertised that way. Games advertising seems to focus more on the new: new graphics, new play mechanics. This might be because film doesn't have the same visible advances year after year that games have. The visible differences between a 1980 and a 2020 game are much more obvious than a 1980 and 2020 film.

When it comes to smaller, more indie games, there are people like Johnathan Blow whose games get advertised as being "from the maker of..."
Supporting audio kinda implies having a DAC...
Lost, by a mile (or potentially being a product of faulty inventory to begin with). The logistics involving nuclear weaponry are so extreme and involve so many people that something getting lost is more likely than some kind of crime.

Do you think presidents can smuggle a nuclear warhead across borders with a donkey or something? Reagan couldn't even manage to sell weapons to fund a bunch of terrorists under the table.
Oh I understand the usefulness of individual monads and infact am very happy that the NodeJS community finally switched to promises from callbacks (even though they violate some of the monad laws, you still get a lot of the same benefits).

I just don't think the generalization of those concepts is very interesting. Monoids seem a lot more interesting to me, especially when it comes to splitting up computations (mapreduce) or partial computation caching, you can really come up with quite a few useful ones

Monads in comparision seem boring.
Wow this is a really, really cool project!
Anecdotally in the past I have felt major differences in my mood right after and over the next few months since after taking mushrooms containing psilocybin (liberty caps locally picked growing in nature).

The quantity was anything but microdoses though. Each time I had them the amount ranged from 6x to 10x individual dried caps (over a period of 4-5 hours each time).

I'm not sure about its impact on my creativity though, but it sure did not impact negatively.
> Cloud software then generates a 3-D representation from the X-rays.

Paying possibly hundreds of thousands of dollars for a machine and still not being able to operate it independently of the producer because a significant part of the software is “on the cloud” is not a good thing.
The "know it when you see it" kind of argument is cognitively vacuous. You are simply creating word salad using such an argument.

A dolphin you enabled to talk is in no meaningfull way a post-dolphin, it is still a dolphin.

The post- prefix presuposes a chronological posteriori point of view, and you can not confirm the veracity of that point of view until you reach it.

In other words you can not call something posthuman until reaching posthumanity and drawing a line, or transhuman until you transcend humanity and can draw the line. The post-adolescent and post-feudalism examples work because they are chronologically in the past and we are arbitrarily drawing a line. Someone in the future might draw the line elsewhere.
The First Small Modular Nuclear Reactor Was Just Approved by US Regulators
Comparing one small homogenous group of people to a very large heterogeneous group of people would require controlling for a rather large set of variables. I don’t see that working well. Additionally, when looking at individuals within a single family we find variances where a diet will work for one and not for another, this applies to workout regimens and the like as well.

I would say more study is needed across the board.
Redox OS: improving drivers and kernel – part 6
i mean, in fairness, VS Code doesn't make for a particularly good day planner :p
I think it may be worth looking into some film history: how did the director come to be the face of the movie in the first place, and the person whose creative vision is considered to be paramount, rather than an unremarkable administrator who simply got a bunch of people pointed in mostly the same direction for a while?

This is not at all my field so I can’t deliver an impromptu lecture on it; the back of my head is saying it largely changed in the US in the seventies, with a lot of influence from French New Wave films, which were very much seen to be strongly shaped by the director, rather than simply managed. I might be wrong here!
Already started; saw one with advertisement screens in a condo building recently in Bangkok. I would find that deeply annoying if I were a resident and paying the building maintenance fees and still had to watch ads every day.
Oh, good point, I should probably update it or remove it. That guide was last updated 5+ years ago, I didn’t even rember that it exists and haven’t been following it for years.
Microbes are actually around 1 micrometer!

Whilst I'd generally hate for a 1 meter bee to exist, it might be worth it just for the nerd joke.

So purely factually, a microbe is only 1/10000th of a bee
I don't see how this may be relevant to the usefulness of microdosing.

- Assume that a microdose either improves an outcome, or does nothing. Then, averaged over a large group, such random improvements would lift the group's outcome a little. It's a microdose worth taking.

- Assume that a microdose can both improve and worsen the outcome, or have no effect. If the experimental group's averaged results are indistinguishable from the control group's averaged results, it means that the microdose worsens the outcome about as often and / or as much as it improves it. This, to me. means that a microdose is a gamble not worth taking.

There is, of course, a difference between a microdose having no effect at all, or having an effect which can be either positive or negative. This difference is important for further research. For usage here and now, it's sadly irrelevant.

If a microdose only works when the person taking it knows it works, then it's basically the placebo effect. A good placebo can be useful, at least for commercial purposes.
I miss not having ads while pumping gas :(.
This whole question in the first place is about people that showed that they don't know such things and so need to be told such things, by the nature of their demands.
Cyberpunk as a genre generally depicts as a technologically advanced dystopia. One can find the setting interesting but not desirable, just as people find post-apocalyptic zombie plagues fascinating but wouldn’t actually want to experience it.
> Tesla then resold the cars without FSD unless the new buyers paid for the scam again.

Are there any historical or modern-day equivalents of this form of transaction?
Ironic that this review of a memoir about bookstores starts off by linking to it on Amazon.
The Song of the Summer: A Heian-era epistolary romance
I found the book “Command and Control: Nuclear Weapons, the Damascus Accident, and the Illusion of Safety” much more terrifying.
All is not well at OpenSea
Do you stream your "background" audio every single time or do you save it locally?
> A regular api poorly implemented will have all the same cons and none of the pros.

Okay, so don't make a poorly implemented one?

Also, no, it kind of won't. Let's look at what they are again

.

"It is actually a pain to use"

Not an API characteristic

.

"you'll have to manage two or more type systems if there are no code first generates in your language"

Not an API characteristic

.

"It doesn't support map/tables/dictionaries."

Not an API characteristic

.

"No clear path for Api versioning"

Not an API characteristic

.

Looks like it's actually zero for four
Explore online communities focused on Personal Knowledge Management. They're full of lifelong learners who love exploring new ideas.

Shameless plug: https://dsebastien.net/blog/2021-11-12-personal-knowledge-ma...
Even more pedantic: The right amount is 0. I did include that case in my answer.
Isn't there a way to legally move against people who dupe companies like this?

Maybe don't chase everyone, but go after just a handful of fraudsters, and once you've won get your PR department to ensure everybody on Earth realizes this is one company not to be messed with.
I see your article mentions this, but I love to highlight this one story:

Strategic air command opposed the installation of these locks. Their stated concern was they would interfere with a launch order, but some think they just resented civilian control.

So they allegedly worked around them. For years, the passcode keeping nuclear war at bay was 00000000

https://web.archive.org/web/20120511191600/http://www.cdi.or...
While "micro" means indeed small, many people have the wrong impression that the similarly sounding "macro" must have an opposite meaning to "micro" so many incorrect terms have been coined, e.g. "macroscopic" vs. "microscopic".

In reality, in Ancient Greek the opposite of "micro" was "mega", i.e. "big" (so megameter vs. micrometer was a correct addition to the metric system in 1873, like also the name Micromegas, which was coined by Voltaire in one of his novellas), while "macro" meant "long", not "big".

("macro" is cognate with words from other European languages which mean slim/slender/thin/lean, only in Ancient Greek its meaning has shifted from "slim" to "long", replacing the older word for "long", "dolicho").
You realize pilots need to practice, right? Skills need maintenance. Not just on the individual scale, but in a societal sense as well.

Swear to God, there are days I see posts like this and just wonder what in the name of all that is holy people expect to keep modernity running. Long term knowledge retention within a population requires taking into account population scale education/onboarding and actually coming to terms with the fact knowledge is extinguished/lost over time as people die.
Psilocybin has truly saved my life. I micro 200-250mg of homegrown every few days.
Where did you read that kratom binds to gaba? I haven't heard that.
sure, it sounds like you understand why the support is bad for most of their devices (which aren't laptops), so here are things Dell support has helped me out with, with one of my laptops they made:

- issues with the OS (yep, Microsoft definitely isn't going to pick up the phone and provide support)

- processor speed issues

- processor virtualization issues

- overnighted me a processor replacement for me to replace under warranty

- overnighted me a technician to fix my poor processor installation, still under warranty

- overnighted me a replacement keyboard to install

as far as I know, Asus has neither negotiated nor paid retailers to provide the type of support manufacturers are supposed to provide, so they can't wash their hands of it

you seem to be pessimistic about things a support team of engineers can or should or will do, possibly based on experience with Asus support :), but tech support for a computer or a device exceeds "have you tried turning it off and back on" and "ok return it", or it's bad support
It makes me feel better to see lots of people using this. I thought there was something wrong with me for liking noises like this and using them to concentrate sometimes or just feel better.
Everyone was happy until I stepped on the elevator and Trout Mask Replica came on.

I always think of Johnny Rotten’s story of playing it at parties to piss people off for these examples. And I do actually like it. But I will admit I listen to Safe As Milk far more often.
> As far as the versioning goes, the prevailing wisdom seems to be that it just isn't needed on graphql apis

In reality, of course API versioning is needed.

The "prevailing wisdom" is people who like the tool, don't like its limitations, and want to pretend it isn't a problem.

.

> That said, versioning of a graphql api has been done at scale before. Shopify has done it

Perl people will happily point out that object systems exist for Perl.

Having it not be a standard, uniform part of the core tool is a severe limitation. Shopify needed this rudimentary feature, and tried to give it away because others need it to, and the tool vendors aren't willing (or able) to deliver.
On Windows I was quite happy with DiffPDF[1]. As far as I remember there used to be an older open source version as well. But I could not found it on first glance.

[1] https://www.qtrac.eu/diffpdf.html
I don't really think that's what the article was getting at.
(although I'm not quite sure what it was trying to do)
I don’t have experience working with Senior Staff’s at Google but in regards to Amazon L7, they’re often very high impact influencing several ‘two pizza teams’ as Amazon calls it. Almost all L7s are expected to be hands on to some degree. This is a stark difference than most companies in which at this level people rarely touch code anymore. Amazon had a very defined track. Moving to L8 is very difficult as it should be. There are probably leas than 50 L8s in all of Amazon if I had to guess. For comparisons check out www.levels.fyi I’m one of the cofounders so happy to answer any other questions as well.
Not really a “they used to be” when you almost named all of them.
Atomic bombs are useful for blowing stuff up (which requires detonating them) or threatening to blow stuff up (which requires other people knowing you possess them). "Laundering" a bomb that remains unknown for 50 years doesn't seem that useful.
Don't waste my time by forcing me into a conversation though. If I want to talk to someone, I have plenty of friends and family for that. If I'm interacting with a service, I know it and want it to be as efficient as possible. Don't force me to write messages and to guess what to write to achieve my goal.

If it's more efficient for me to have a link in the first text, I'd prefer it to be there. The advice to use the correct domain is good, I don't like it when I don't know where a link leads. And make it easy to copy it manually, I'm using a dumb phone currently and may prefer to do stuff from my laptop anyway. Easier to copy does not mean shorter, words are easier to read than random strings of character, but it helps.
Not really sure what the authorial intent is here tbh.
Has anyone tried creating deliberative infrastructure in support of crafting better OER? For instance, each field's science education research has lists of misconceptions commonly reinforced in textbooks. It could be nice to collect such lists and... not do that.

The quality of science textbooks has been decried by researchers for decades. Even with SER focused on narrowly incremental improvements, on the easily deployable, textbooks often don't reflect it. Incentives are poorly aligned, authorial resources too limited, and scope constraints too severe. Further, attempts at less incremental, more foundational improvements, are very rare (eg, integrated life-sciences curriculums). What support might allow OER to achieve better?

OpenStax "View online"'s nice text search allowed quickly finding such common misconceptions. And OpenStax supports open errata databases. The database of a past version of a textbook could be reached by URL editing. One misconception was pointed out twice, and WONTFIXed "Our reviewers determined the textbook meets scope, sequence, and accuracy requirements as is. No change will be made." Perhaps if the errata database had a discussion mechanism, like github issues, the problem might have been clarified and the new version of the textbook fixed? (Disclaimer: It's a misconception I commonly check for, and one of the two comments might be mine.)

Problems this pervasive are structural. How might OER creation be restructured to work better? Ideally much much better? For instance, support for easily combining patch-sets might allow an ecology of "ok, I fixed/improved this bit", avoiding multi-year gatekeeping delays.

A decade or two back, NSF almost funded a national science education wikipedia... but didn't. Each common misconception might have had pages of literature overview, discussion, remedies. Is there an alternate timeline where science education content has dramatically improved?
No, you can replicate the effect easily in a high school classroom.

https://youtu.be/kwtt51gvaJQ

It’s literally that easy to demonstrate.
Microsoft 3D Space Cadet Pinball ported to redox_OS
The Humbling of Coinbase
I was trying to be flippant, which is fun for me but obviously not very helpful, so let me rephrase my answer.

I agree there is a non-zero amount of grains that is healthy to consume, but your answer doesn't say anything about what that amount should be, and as such just states something that is pretty obvious. It would improve your answer a lot if you stated which quantities you are thinking of, and even more if you include sources.

From your original comment I honestly was not able to tell that your recommendation was to eat cereal daily in the amounts recommended by the back of the box.
Isn't it about runtime macros vs compile time macros aka templates, Haskell has no runtime macros, LISP has them, I'd guess you can manipulate and redefine mostly everything in runtime in LISP, not so in Haskell?
I wish people better understood that their advocacy of and for drugs is and was pushed by the CIA to essentially deconstruct and damage a society that would otherwise organize and oppose the will of the ruling class. There is an interesting book that was recently released, The Poisoner in Chief that is a good introduction, even though it seems it is meant to also be a bit of a rehabilitation of a horrible human, Sidney Gottlieb.
My Grandmother’s Lingo
Fact. He never intended for his name to prefix the game titles he made. Sid’s pretty humble.
100% grass fed or "grass fed and grass finished" is a bit harder to find I think?
My decision tree:

1. Do I think this is a good feature? No -> I'm sorry, I don't think this is a good fit for the project.

2. Am I excited about implementing it? No -> This is a good idea, but I'm not up for adding it right now. If you or someone else wanted to send a PR I'd be happy to review!

3. Am I going to get to this soon? No -> This is a good idea, and something I'd like to add, but I might not get to it for a while. If you or someone else wanted to send a PR I'd be happy to review!

4. If it passes all these filters it's generally something I do right away. Fewer and fewer of these as the simple excellent features have generally all been added.

So far I've found that as long as I'm clear with people no one gets obnoxious. If they did I'd say something about how this is a project I maintain for fun in my spare time.
901 LC Hard, 25/8/366
SIM Lock. My iPhone has a physical AT&T SIM that i lock. I don't want it to be an esim yet so I can swap it to a different phone which will prompt me for a PIN to unlock it.
"Thank you for the proposal but unfortunately it does not fit in the scope and vision I have for the application, and I rather spend time on areas that I believe in.

However if this is very important to you, I can consider implementing it for a fair compensation for my time."

Something like that. And ensure that contract doesn't include lifetime support/maintenance... :)
> after the app stopped working to unlock my car

Wait... what? You had to use an app to unlock your car!?

What manufacturer was this? Did it come that way from the factory?