skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
But if you own your home you don’t have to worry about paying for a place to live (taxes aside.)

I do see how knowing what your liquid net worth is has some value, but knowing your expenses has value, too.
Agreed!

What follows is in addition, not in contradiction.

The complexity of human musculoskeletal coordination is astonishing. Particularly in sport, but also in daily life. Consider: how many ways are there to raise a cup to your mouth? Basically: infinite. And yet you do it without a care, almost reflexively, barely paying attention. In sub-second sporting tasks, the role of the conscious brain is likely to be zero, but the role of anything above the brain stem is also often unclear.

The spine - home to reflex action - doesn't have the processing power to determine how to return a tennis serve, yet this sort of action is far quicker than any deliberate, calculated, conscious action.

When I last spent any time reading around the subject, the literature was full of stuff like how the central nervous system updates its expectations based on feedback when trying to achieve a goal; and hints about how musculoskeletal movement might involve "orchestration" of composable units of coordination.

It's a fascinating area of research.

Overlaps with robotics and ML are obvious, although I suspect those approaches are "inventing" rather than "discovering". Nothing inherently wrong with that, of course.
Without knowing the context, I would tentatively agree that your example seems more like a mistranslation. Nevertheless, in my experience those tend to be the exception rather than the rule. I've seen a lot more cases of subtitles (both professional and fansubs) erring by being overly stiff and literal than the opposite.

> You really think "sus" will stand the test of time, be intelligible to viewers years and decades from now? It's at least a debatable point although you're comparing it to Japanese that by your own admission has survived a quarter century.

Well, "sus" has been on Urban Dictionary for about 20 years, and Wiktionary has a citation from 1972, so it's not like it's some radically new term that is likely to come and go in a short period of time. Besides, plenty of creative works use language that becomes dated over time, and that doesn't make them bad.
At work, we just deprecated Firefox last week too, after encountering some HTML Canvas performance bugs that have been around for years.

Firefox was less than 3% of our user base, even less than Edge, and we just didn't have the resources to keep debugging for one browser. Everything else is Blink and Webkit.

RIP...
Marc Andreessen says he’s for new housing, but records tell a different story
oh man, that reminds me of typing .com programs from magazine listings into DEBUG.EXE
Again, the culture hasn't changed. I remember paid Photoshop tutorial two decades ago, just as there is free prompt databases nowadays as I mentioned in the previous post. There always was and will always be some people trying to profit, and others doing it for free. It's still the case now.

I still maintain that Dall-E is just a tool just like Photoshop, it just happens to be a layer above. IT takes time and effort to find the right prompt to get the result you want, just like it takes time and effort to find the right effects and filters in Photoshop to get what you want.

Anything that takes time and effort to do will always have demand, which will always have people trying to monetize, while others trying to do for free.
Well. All I know is this.

I was a weird kid, and my mom protected me. I grew up on a farm in a pretty rural area.
When I was between my sophomore and junior year in high school, my dad wanted me to work on the farm, to make me a man, or whatever. I wanted to go to science camp for the summer. Ma, put her foot down, and I got to go to science camp.

I dunno about the god stuff. I am not holding my breath on the message. But, I am lighting her candle.

That's all I got to say on it.
> Does Google really want to achieve their stated mission?

Consider what happened to "Don't be evil".

> I would like to see Search Engine Optimization ended with extreme prejudice.

> destroying the "information" that they want to make "universally accessible and useful".

> Google Reader dying was a sad day indeed. So was usenet dying was a sad day. So was the town square post board, and before that the town crier.

See also what happened to Rap Genius.

> Talk is cheap.

But so persuasive and effective, something that is best controlled if one is in certain lines of work.
I spent some time working on something called DataProfiler python library

https://github.com/capitalone/DataProfiler

The gist is that you can point to any common dataset and load it directly into pandas.

from dataprofiler import Data

data = Data("your_file.csv") # Auto-Detect & Load: CSV, AVRO, Parquet, JSON, Text, URL

I simply hate dealing with loading data, so it's my go-to.
YouTube has one. There are also timestamps.
One difference is that Pokémon cards are physical objects
Love your story. I too ran into Qbasic as a teenager in the early 90s and ended up studying CS and then programming for a living. Actually the programming is for hire at the moment as I want to spend any amount of time I can get away from computers, but it comes in waves and before you know it I find myself tinkering with programming languages in my spare time. Do you ever think what would it be like for you if you decided to go to med school instead of CS?
Crunchyroll Acquires Anime Superstore Right Stuf
It was miraculous. The trade off was that there was a small upper bound on the message size, and it was all transmitted in the open. You couldn’t write a long love letter, for example. But for short, urgent messages, or even a simple “I love you and miss you a lot”, it was astoundingly useful. The morale boost from knowing you could get word home in under a day was tremendous.
Woke propaganda? I haven’t seen an absolute ton of anime, but I’ve got nearly 200 items on my list, and I don’t think I’ve watched anything that could qualify. What are you coming across that I’m not?
This is probably the most naive comment in this thread. At that bar is set pretty high.

Where there's a will there's a way...
LinkedIn Organic Reach: How to Nail It?
Over 810 million people use LinkedIn worldwide. There are approximately 185 million active users in the US. The US is its largest market. 4 out of 5 people on LinkedIn “drive business decisions”. Thus, LinkedIn is the best platform for targeting businesses.

Read this post to up your content's organic reach.
The solution of "let's just have smart and benevolent rulers" to the old "Who will guard the guards?" question doesn't have the greatest track record.
If you belonged to a group of people who believe that such companies shouldn't exist, then you should lobby for it to be outlawed, not try to rule by (small!) minority.
Some off the beaten path places stay off the beaten path because they're genuinely hard to get to.

https://en.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Previously_Off_the_beaten_pat...
That's quite a sensational scenario you've presented there.
> In this ruling, which has impacted so many, the court did not take away a right. The court stated that it had taken away the power of the people and created a law where none existed.

This ignores the fact that the previous status quo was that not that the court had taken away the power, but that the court had recognized that a inalienable right existed based on the 14th amendment, and as such was not something that the states had power to legislate. This is not the creation of a law, but an interpretation of it. See Roe at p33 [1]

Given that we as a society have for 50 years believed that we had such an INALIENABLE right, that a court of any regard can take such a right away is pure nonsense.

I guess the easiest question to ask of you is do you "OrangeMonkey" believe in an inalienable right to privacy, whether it's enumerated explicitly or not in the constitution. Because this all falls on that singular point regardless of the outcome on Roe / Dobbs. As a male, Dobbs doesn't directly affect me in its impact of whether I can have an abortion. But it affects my understanding of what the state can or cannot do with respect to my private actions. See Roe at para 77 [2] and especially para 117 [3].:

In the words of Mr. Justice Frankfurter, Great concepts like . . . 'liberty' . . . were purposely left to gather meaning from experience. For they relate to the whole domain of social and economic fact, and the statesmen who founded this Nation knew too well that only a stagnant society remains unchanged.

One of Dobbs effects is that the 14th amendment is narrowly constructed to only mean as much as "liberty" could possibly mean when it was passed. There is much ado about the concept of "ordered liberty", which although it explores did not exist in the framer's construction. Dobbs claims that the court does not have the ability to interpret the idea of liberty with respect to the context of society (that is overwhelmingly pro-choice). When interpretation is the entire rationale for the courts existence, this point is particularly ridiculous.

[1]: Roe v Wade. para 33. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/410/113#p33

[2]: Roe v Wade. para 77. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/410/113#p77

[3]: Roe v Wade. para 114. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/410/113#p117
maybe they can fix the years-old 'sort by date' reddit bug. I am tired of 5-10 year old reddit posts showing up when searching by past year or month.
I know several scientists with PhDs whose workflow involved Windows 7 sticky notes to an extent that would make the average HN reader pull out their hair in shock.

We're talking about well-published in Nature experts.

Sure, eventually they publish results with LaTeX, but a lot of intermediate steps will involve Excel/Word or even something more primitive.

It is what it is.
You are confusing the C standard and actual platforms/C implementations. A lot of things are UB in the standard but perfectly well defined on your platform. Standards don’t compile code, real compilers do. The standard doesn’t provide standard library implementations, the actual platform does.

Targeting the standard is nice, but if all of your target platforms guarantee certain behaviors, you might consider using those. A lot of UB in the C standard is perfectly defined and consistent across MSVC, GCC, Clang, and ICC.
In India, regulations stated that ads on cable TV pay-to-view were supposed to be limited / less than Free-to-Air channels. But it wasn't much different ...
Women who dress that way are doing it to compete with other women, not because men told them to.
"Without knowing the context, I would tentatively agree that your example seems more like a mistranslation."

What does the context matter when the person who made the change, not mistranslation, freely admits to it!

How can you claim to be an authority about these issues when you're not aware of what may be the single worst example of it, and have no interest in investigating this when it's brought to your attention?
Webkit/Safari is the closest thing to competition that Chrome has. Firefox is so rarely used it that it doesn't really factor into any decision making anymore.

If Safari (especially iPhone) doesn't support something, that's a big deal. If Firefox doesn't support something, people shrug and move on.
Outside the US by more than 100 miles, then.
Does the need for constant vigilance suck? Yes. Is it necessary because humans will be humans? Also yes. If change is inevitable, as is turnover in governance and those who participate in it, than naturally systems and underlying mechanisms must be maintained to ensure stability.

People problems demand people solutions. I know, it’s a bummer. No tech saved Kansas abortion rights earlier this week. Overwhelming constituent turnout to vote did (voter registration is up 1000% in Kansas). (Used only as an example for my thesis)
Can I ask Ebay to provide me 10x leverage on my pokemon card, to buy other pokemon cards? You can on many exchanges.

Can I go to Ebay with my newly created "Fokemon" cards. Sell them to myself for pennies on the dollar in bulk. Generating demand from those thinking "Fokemon" is the new craze, and dump my supply making millions. While EBay lists my "Fokemon" cards to it's userbase while also taking a cut of a large "Fokemon" stash ("ICO"). This happened on MANY exchanges.

Can I go to Ebay and sell 100s of thousands of dollars of merch which was bought with North Korean money? Well you can on many exchanges. Heck some exchanges don't require KYC for the first 1 BTC!!! per 'account'. Ebay does not let the same human seller open tons of seller accounts. In fact there's a black market of Ebay sellers asking 3rd parties to open accounts on behalf of them.

So while there's some similarities, the difference is in respect to money laundering and fraud. Ebay actually tries to enforce both, where-as many exchanges often encourage both.
Yeah, those sited go out the window entirely. It's a search engine for documents, not applications.
What web infrastructure does it not play well with? It's using standard HTTP/1.1 and 2.0 POST requests. Nothing that's in the way of your browser and server, like a proxy or load balancer, should notice, care or fail in any way.
This is such a fantastic write up. Also, a missed opportunity for a smashing submission to ioccc
> You get used to it.

I tried. I wanted to see if I could get used to it and save some money on AC and be more environmentally friendly in my permanent WFH situation. I tried for a month but never got used to it. I was just uncomfortable and sleepy all the time.
Ads always makes me think a service is shit. If it needs ads, how can it be good software? It makes them look so unprofessional.
About 3-5%
Indeed. Also note post I was responding to.

Note that macOS' Xnu kernel supports BSD system calls (e.g. chroot(2)), and macOS includes a BSD userland which I think is largely derived from FreeBSD.

In principle it should be possible (though non-trivial) to add support for the relevant BSD system calls such as jail(2) and jail_attach(2), as well as the appropriate sysctls to enable BSD jails to actually run natively on macOS.

(For comparison, Linux implements containers primarily via the unshare(2) and setns(2) system calls, as well as /proc and cgroups. It's more of an a la carte approach since there are a number of independent namespaces supported by unshare(2). And bind mounts, overlayfs and the older unionfs, and the venerable chroot(2). Etc.)

To me it seems that supporting the BSD system calls and infrastructure would be a reasonable evolution of macOS' BSD subsystem.

Moreover, as you note, macOS could add an Apple-specific native container feature or framework. Consider that macOS already has a lower-level Hypervisor framework as well as a higher-level Virtualization framework which provided an easy to use API for creating VMs. They could implement their own Container framework or perhaps adapt or extend the existing Virtualization framework.
I think this covers most of it https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32349581

I wish I had asked more though.
Have you read the guidelines recently?

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity.

Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. Videos of pratfalls or disasters, or cute animal pictures. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic.
Does google have ads? I've not seen one for so long.
If this standard was applied perfectly, large competitors would actually follow the laws... just like large businesses do today with laws that are actually enforced (MUCH more so than small businesses especially)... and why do you think they wouldn't be the ones trying to sabotage the upstart competitors? That's historically much more likely (although I'm sure it would in fact happen in both directions).

Moreover, is that bad? Is punishing people when they do something illegal bad?
Not naive, trolling.
10/10 != 9/10
> For instance, in Chrome, you can search from within Developer Tools to match against all rendered text, which would include the text in drop-down menus and other areas of the site.

I've never thought of doing this. This would have been helpful in so many past searches.
I find pd.read_sql and SQLAlchemy very handy sometimes.
Deep-pocket jurisprudence
If that's true then there's no way in hell Duo has 10x more installs?
(Not the OP, but) A headless CMS is pretty great. Or Airtable.
Not really sorry. Climate policy in Australia is going through Parliament right now (and while much more progressive than the previous government, the result still have the Greens stating the targets are not aggressive enough and will doom the reef).
Oh sure, it wasn't a social network, but it was, like the GP said, the apex of what Google once was: innovation in the field with completely new, potentially useless, but ultimately eyes-opening tech
If important data for a business is in Excel, that company has a data problem.

There's no playback to previous states, there's no control over the flow (because there isn't any flow), versioning has to be bolted on and security is managed by the user.

Excel is a liability.
I was kind of surprised that the hosting of such stuff was a significant enough cost that removing it was seen as worth it - but I have no idea what their annual revenue is, and a million dollars is a million dollars.

That said, they were talking about deleting dead projects from unpaid accounts, and it does seem kind of shitty that as a community we seem to have decided that once a company has hosted some content that they should be required to host it forever at their own expense.
See also some context for Google search operators including ones that have been removed: https://ahrefs.com/blog/google-advanced-search-operators/ and changed: https://www.googleguide.com/quote_operator.html (IIRC this was due to Google+ and was an internally unpopular change, but my memory may be faulty).
Something the kindle can't emulate
The SEC, and really every related regulatory agency, has been completely missing in action while shadow banks like Tether and USDC act as gasoline for spreading cryptocurrency fraud to the general public. The amount of fraudulent behavior occuring unchecked in plain view is staggering, and as someone who has been following cryptocurrency since the 2017 bubble it's completely erased what little confidence I had left in the federal governmnent. This is far too little too late.
It's not a complete illusion. Cash transactions can't just be shut down with a push of a button- although it might not seem like much, it's a significant hurdle for authoritarianism.

Yeah, all systems are fallible. But systems that fail on the side of the individual are preferable to those that fail on the side of the institution. So let's strive for individual liberty instead of wishing for benevolent rulers.
grpcurl is handy for testing your API with JSON.
I'm not even mad anymore about the search quality.

Google search is such a shitfest right now, you have to scroll a full page in a 100% 4k screen to get to actual results, it's absolutely disgusting.

I don't care if they search is unoptimal or downright bad. The ad situation is so much worse IMO.
Excel is what you hope your competition is using.
Yes, I bought Excel to use it on my Mac.
Note here - they aren't changing what results are returned when you search with quotes, they are just highlighting what you searched with quotes in bold in the snippet displays in the search results page.
Ultimately they just want to show you ads for you to accidentally click on
Yes, these are forever spreading disinformation on various topics in my social group. I am forever telling people to actually click and read the article rather than trust the automatic tl;dr by Google.
With Google+ gone, will + make a return as well?
Big-G only shows about 10 or fewer actual (non-advertisement) results on the first page, too. Regardless of screen size.

What's up with that? Seems a little stingy.. why go to the effort of HTTP2 to deliver so few hits?
dffr-bleed, but you forgot that we need a really good logo.
But that's the entire point of the guard page, it causes a page fault. That's not corruption.

Denial of service by trying to allocate something too big for the stack is obvious. I'm asking about how corruption is supposed to happen on a reasonable platform.
Lol, can't tell if Google is parodying itself right now.
The reality is sometimes that regulators kick the door in for banks financially including legal stuff:
Operation Choke Point [1]

The consequence of abolishing cash seems to be total financial control and that is a bit like arming the police: of course you might need military equipment for fighting a cartel.

But applying it to daily operation is very cruel to parts of society.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Choke_Point
I get sent GPT-3 blogspam as "guest posts" from wannabe "contributors" every day, and I can say that the moment you expect GPT-3 to write anything remotely technical, it turns to shit. Simultaneously, anything people have written by GPT-3 is frequently full of algorithmically detectable plagiarism.

Needless to say, all of these people get told to fuck off and get a job.
Read well-written books and articles. Learn proper grammar. Apply what you learn to everyday writing, whether it's an email to a colleague or a text message to your wife. You'll improve over time.
Looks to be about 250M/year

[source](https://about.gitlab.com/press/releases/2022-03-14-gitlab-re...)
The Tesla Model 3's computer's range calculator gives a max efficiency at 22mph.
Sorry if this is off-topic, but I read the article, it was interesting but geez that's a lot of effort, then I went to the root domain and click click click you know how it goes, I'm on the author's mastodon. There I found a link that lead me to the most interesting melodrama PR I have ever read, the ever ridiculous Daniel Micay having some sort of an "episode" in public. It was a thoroughly entertaining read and I recommend it highly:

https://github.com/bromite/bromite/pull/2102
Not a good idea, because it's much easier to figure out "google is treating my query too loosely" than "google is treating my query too strictly and there is such a thing as 'looser'". People would just think the results suck.

Instead, it should be possible to set that as a preference so that it persists across your searches.
In a cashless society there is a lot of information about people in few hands and you never know how this information will be used now or in the future. It can be a democracy or a dictatorship. The corruption is everywhere, the threshold is different.
Because ranking is very difficult
It is made more difficult to enjoy a cigarette every year. Taxes go up and up, smoking permissible places become fewer ans fewer, fines get higher and higher...
You misunderstood the context. I didn’t request a citation, I pointed out that the provided citation didn’t support the provided claims. I mentioned that I would be interested in learning more, but that’s not the same thing as insisting on a citation.
have a paper-scissors-rock style guard - the separation of powers and checks and balances.

Institution1 holds regulatory powers, and institution2 is the guard/police for institution1. Then another institution3 guards institution2, and institution1 also has a responsibility to oversea institution3.
Any sort of violence that the people in power don't like
> Do you upvote/downvote comments you reply to?

Neither because this isn't Reddit.
> Truly, faith is a choice

I know this is something people say, but I've never found it to be true. I could pretend to believe but deep down that wouldn't make me a believer. If I could simply choose to believe there was something after death I would, it would be a great comfort, but I simply cannot.