skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There are laws about exactly that, you will have to read them as they apply to you, avoiding them is quite literally illegal.

In Europe, we have freedom of movement for goods and services, special tax status still has to exist between (for example) Denmark and Sweden, for Swedes who travel the bridge to Denmark to work. -- I believe this is called the Oresund agreement.

You must have a primary residence and you must spend 51% of your time there. Other countries in Europe do not permit working from them unless it's temporary, I believe you have 3 months to register with the local tax office.
Agree, far too many of them here at HN.
This is about commit comments, not commit messages.
Left turns off 19th should be banned throughout. If you want to cross that flow of traffic you need to pull out of it to the right, into any working street and then come back at it perpendicular and wait for a traffic light to create a gap for you.

Camping out in the left lane clogging up half the capacity of the street while you wait for a gap in the oncoming direction is psychopathic behavior.
> Professional athletes pay taxes to every state where they play a game.

The same is not true of businesspeople.

Programmers do not pay taxes to every state in which a hotel is situated in which they write a line of code.

Corporate salespeople do not pay taxes to every state that hosts a conference in which they close a deal.

CEOs do not pay taxes to every state that hosts an event at which they speak to the public and recruit a new staff member.

Perhaps the tax authorities expect them to, but in general this is simply not done, any more than your bartender is claiming their cash tips.
We're decades away from having a Mars colony, and decades more from it being self sufficient. In that time period, the prospects of such a colony exercising political independence is doubtful. While it's dependent on Earth (and e.g. SpaceX is dependent on US government support for its launch site and many of its more hazardous materials), then it can't meaningfully ignore the host country of facilities on Earth.

So in Musk's lifetime, the most he can hope for is a corporate funded US controlled research base of some sort.

I think legally the treaties on outer space are that it's common hold and therefore not subject to countries exercising exclusive sovreignty, though obviously such a claim, as with Antartica, is easier for everyone to agree on when there's severe technical difficulties with no equivalent benefit to be had in investing in this.

Should that change, and some technical advance renders a Mars colony much easier than expected these days or much more valuable than expected, then that official neutrality that will be renegotiated, and it would probably look like the scramble for africa with more of a veneer of trying to be respectful. But we're well into sci-fi territory at that point.
Rights don't come from the government. The government can only infringe upon rights. The fact that tyrants will try to stop you does not mean it isn't a right.

>They're unlicensed because they either didn't take the required training, or lost their license, or perhaps lost significant vision.

Or they're unlicensed because they meet the standards and more, perhaps even trained as professional drivers. They may be far more safe than others but merely believe driving is a right, and thus do not submit to infringements. If you've been on the road, you can see having a license has little bearing on whether you are a safe driver.

>In some states (maybe all?) you agree to this FACT when you get your license

Those who haven't gotten a license haven't agreed with that "fact."

>https://driversed.com/driving-information/the-driving-privil...

I thought you would enjoy one quote from the website you cited: "No one has more right to the road than anyone else." That is, their statement necessarily agrees those with a license have no more right to use the road than anyone else such as those who don't.
Quite good quick start tutorial can be found here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=704brywiyfw
If you like close calls, here's another last second ejection [1]. This one is an F-16 from the US Air Force's "Thunderbirds" demonstration squadron. Ejection was initiated 0.8 seconds before impact.

The cause of this was an error by the pilot when setting up for the show. He got the altitude of the airport wrong, thinking it was about 800 ft (~240 m) lower than it really was.

Here's a video, showing both inside and outside views [2].

[1] http://www.ejectionsite.com/thunderbird6.htm

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alo_XWCqNUQ
If a large company (let's say Walmart) offered free recharging for EVs in their parking lots, that might bring more customers in. Your car needs an hour for recharging, might as well be right in front of the store.
Hi friend, Consider checking out one of these network states: https://thenetworkstate.com/dashboard
Speech recognition done locally on browsers is lame anyway, almost every site needing it use a custom solution.
Sounds like guaranteed “organic”, “vegan”, “fair-trade”—take your pick—failure to disclose.

Whatever you believe about digital or analog, lying to the faithful has its consequences.
The End of the Warehouse Bubble
haha if you know me from twitter you would know i am steadfastly noncrypto (though not anticrypto)
Well, you make a fair point, expecting to get rich quick is obviously unrealistic. I think people like me got caught because with Helium at least the basic economic premise of "you are being paid to offer your internet uplink/bandwidth for use by others" makes sense.
This is in contrast to some of the various crypto ponzi schemes where the only way for a token to gain value is for more people to buy into it.

If we took crypto out of the equation entirely and Helium was a startup offering payments in $ while not being transparent about their usage/adoption rates, would we feel the same way about those who "fell for it" and invested in miners? I'm honestly not sure.
Heck, if you don't even know that modern editors come with a "why would I look at an amplitude when the information we care about is in the spectrogram?" view, you're going to learn something pretty special.

The audio is a landscape, and anything that isn't a "global" operation (like normalizing, noise reduction, cross-fades) ranging from from just touching it up a but literal sound-from-nothing is about sculpting that landscape.

Rather than Photoshop, it's more like 3D Modeling for your audio. (while using a top-down view in RX, although some tools will let you toggle between 2d and 3d because seeing the landscape is quite valuable)
Thanks! An RSS feed isn't supported by my mobile browser (Brave) neither by my mobile email client (proton). I guess my use case is slightly different.
Philosophy means 'The love of wisdom'. So if you like wisdom, you should gather as much of it as possible. There are different extremes to this. Some just love reading the odd inspirational quote or kernel of wisdom. Others seek out esoteric literature and esoteric or less-well-known books that aren't as popular as the mainline schools of thought like stoicism or epistemology or religious dogma, or even...The Bible.
I don’t get it. From a UX perspective the common expectation would be to be able to see all discussion related to the commits in the PR. If the sources vary give visual clues. It lies close to arrive at “If the user can interact with one comment from a PR view they should be able to interact with all comments, doing otherwise would inhibit discourse”
Yes, if the goal was to make money, Wardle struck at exactly the right time, right at the peak.
Ah, thanks for the clarification.

This was definitely not obvious to me from their announcement and I wouldn't be surprised if others similarly misinterpret it.
well, maybe we should change that. i have some experience in event organizing (https://www.swyx.io/manifest-meetups)

how do you get "events in your inbox" - is that meetup.com? where else do you hear about stuff? i mostly do 1:1's but i'd actually love to make a regular noncrypto tech meetup open to all
They don't start fresh every three months.

Usually they have multiple leagues cooking up in the oven at any given time, so that if the league they want to release isn't ready in time, another, simpler idea will likely be within reach of completion.

The timeline is as such because their business model requires engagement spikes every three months. Remember that Path of Exile is free-to-play.

I also want to add that PoE has grown into one of, if not THE most complex games ever made; there are so many overlapping systems and mechanics that there were memes about what would happen if they added any more special destination buttons to the worldmap. And I'm not even talking about the initial release; it was a complicated game then, but now it has the mechanics of at least a dozen leagues baked into the core game play; many of those leagues are an entire game unto themselves (like Delve)

I love it for this, but it makes me sad that most gamers don't try and reason about this complex thing, and instead follow build guides and copy streamers, instead of experiment. Also, because of the nature of the game's deisgn, you need to play for a stupendous amount of hours to reach the end- endgame, and for most folks you also need to trade items with people IRL as the designers intentionally do not add a decent trade system. There are a lot of other quirks that reflect the designers' intent to not make life easy, either, and players both love and hate that.
I always said chorizo was heavenly.

(I'll see myself out)
Nope, he is in the 50%.

https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/...
There is almost nothing that bothers me more than the control of information.

At least with this issue, however, the reasoning as to why data is being manipulated is so abundantly clear that there is actually virtually no loss of information for the time being. The reality is that Asians largely constitute a problem for the prevailing narrative around racial and ethnic power dynamics. Indians, for example, despite being "brown," and despite being from a "developing" country, are overwhelmingly overrepresented in upper economic echelons. This holds true not just when compared to natively born Americans, but also when controlling for immigration and starting economic conditions. They're also extremely underrepresented in violent crime statistics. Many of these figures remain consistent across the board for Asians living in the US, despite living in a system "designed to explicitly benefit white men." The"model minority myth" is a pathetic manipulation of information in an attempt to account for the narrative-breaking statistics regarding Asian immigrants.

When it comes to violence against Asians, there are multiple reasons to muddy the waters, because there are multiple reasons why statistics cause problems. For one, it has been well established that the "racial" group that is overrepresented in violence against Asians is not "white" people. This is clearly a large problem on its own, but it isn't the only problem. The other problem is seeing how disproportionately low violent crime is within the Asian community, even when controlling for economic factors.

TL;DR this is unacceptable, but at least for now, completely predictable. In a decade or so, however, the information we had a year ago could be considered out of date, and narratives can be shielded from data.
Yes! What if we could have a post-scarcity energy society? If we generate so much energy it might as well be infinite, there is no need to economize at all. No need to worry about consumption. Direct carbon capture? Sure. Water desalinization? Absolutely. The efficiency of these processes stops mattering.

Solar power with batteries for everything, nuclear energy as backup.
The article discusses it generally but uses bribery as the example. Perhaps that’s the confusion. Someone said the idea that we’re gonna find bribes is silly. Someone else said that’s insane, how could you not imagine the govt doing something coercive. Reply was that’s not what I said. Another challenge follows asserting that the gov’t is generally shady and coercive. I tried to clarify what I see as the confusion (bribery vs coercion as an example used in the article). Sorry if my statement was overly broad, my intention was to say we’re probably mostly on the same side and arguing over semantics. Maybe not all of the world is (e.g. Twitter), but it seemed like the case here. Maybe not and tptacek believes the gov’t is infallible. IDK. I like DJB and appreciate what he’s doing.
There are speed traps on some neighborhood streets in Chicago that are so hair trigger sensitive (or maybe just miscalibrated?) that locals just don't drive down that street. They go a block out of their way to not pass that camera. Even some people who live on that block do this.
> Your coworkers/customers have no need to know with regards to your physical location.

From the outside, I think the original author might be implying that it isn't anyone else's business and I will comply with proper tax filings.

I live in Canada, not the USA. My understanding with the IRS is that as long as you properly file with your primary residence and pay owed taxes everything is fine. This assumes you're legal to work for the entity there.

If you work at a company that says, you must live in New York, but you move to Austin, why should the employer be able to say no to that if you're hired under a remote contract? I hear the arguments of security, customer contracts, but then you have executives who travel for work outside of even the country and continue to do work. Double standards.

Even living in another state, why is the employer a part of this conversation? I don't think employers should be apart of the conversation of knowing if an employee is eligible to work for them or not. It should be the government who provides an employee number and as long as you have a valid one the employer shouldn't be involved.

For withholding taxes, the same thing, the employer should pay to the government in reference to the employee number, government withhold and deposit with the individuals configuration.

I know the argument is on the company's liability side regarding state laws, but those should be governed where the entity and employer contract is, not the individual's location.
Your language feels Haskellish, with some Rust-like syntax and mutation thrown in. Were those languages inspiration?
This may become possible using the new Untrusted Device feature, allowing you to have a SyncThing client somewhere that hosts but cannot access your files. (https://docs.syncthing.net/users/untrusted.html)

I use this feature with a friend of mine. We both have NAS', and we both have each other's NAS as an untrusted SyncThing device. (It's also pretty trivial to run a Linode/DigitalOcean low end VPS as an untrusted client. In fact if neither has a one-click install I'd be surprised.)
Thanks for this feedback - it's very helpful!

1) Yep. This I know. The tech is the easy part, by far. Any suggestions on which fields might be most open to this approach, and where to approach them?

2) Good point. At the moment, there is a lot of technical work to do, so that's where my head is. But if we get big enough to where we can afford it, community moderators who can help guide the community towards a collaborative approach and gently nudge back some of the egos I've already been told (many times over) are a problem were already on the list. Social scientists are a great suggestion that I had not thought of.

3) This may be an area where we disagree - at least partially. I understand the need to talk to peers in a mutual language, and I'm not arguing against that. My thought is that this platform could help provide space for translators. Papers and responses would be in the technical language of the field, but I've thought about including a (heavily moderated) peanut gallery below for translators to help the lay public understand the work.

One of the issues that has been front and center in the pandemic is that a lot of bad vaccine science was easily accessible to the public, and when it was done intentionally by snake oil salesmen, intentionally made easily understandable. But the good stuff was locked up behind paywalls or hard to understand. There were translators on social media who did their best to answer the concerns but there weren't enough of them. There are a lot of people not currently in academia who have enough of a foundation to tell snake oil from the real deal and who could help translate, with access. Right now, they don't have access. So you wind up with PDFs of "1000 papers showing why vaccines are harmful" getting shared around and no easy way for people adjacent to the communities where they are being shared to counter them.

Additionally, science is supposed to be an open process - we're supposed to trust it not because of appeals to authority, but because, in theory, we can replicate the reasoning and experiments that got us to our current understanding. Now, of course, replicating the experiments is mostly impossible for the lay person at this point, but someone who's interested and has the time should be able to follow along. We can't say, in the same breath, "You should trust science, because it's open and you can replicate it" and "Oh, you can't understand this." We need to create space for scientists to talk to each other, and for translators to help the public understand and follow the conversation in real time.

We would all benefit from a greater understanding of all aspects of science, and from the increased trust that come with understanding.
> Classical 6 figures tech job in AI for bigtech. Fully remote chill work hours you know the deal.

I wish I knew this deal. My big tech job doesn't let me chill out from Bali :)

I'm not sure you'll meet a high concentration of highly qualified tech people in exotic places. On the other hand, If you have the luxury to work from a developing country, it's hard to justify living in the most expensive places in the world (San Francisco, Hong Kong).

Personally, I've met the most interesting people in my company. I don't have any need to go to various meet ups. So maybe it's a solution. Spend some part of your time working in office and build a network there, and travel a few months a year.
The interception rate of the Iron Dome basically doesn't matter anyways. If ever, for example, Hezbollah or even Hamas actually decide to seriously strike Israel, they will completely saturate the Iron Dome.

This is also probably why it's interception rate is higher - these attacks haven't been even from Hamas and have been in very small concentration.

It's a tough pill to swallow, but if the Palestinians or Iranians ever decide to drown Israel in rocket artillery, there is no real possible defense.

At around ~500$ for a bog standard MLRS rocket, it costs about as much to buy a literal million rockets than it costs for a single F-35 over its lifetime. These are, by the way, far more accurate, far faster, and pack a lot more of a punch than the rockets that are being launched lately.

The only bottleneck Hezbollah has is really that it's pretty difficult to actually supply the rockets.
Should subjects have “points” before we study them? Is it good enough that the point may be in the eye of the beholder? Should your life goal be to fulfill a desire for importance you didn’t choose yourself? Can “why” questions ever have satisfying answers?

Wouldn’t it be helpful if people wrote down their models of life, living, what constitutes knowledge, theories of mind and aesthetics, so you could get to the bottom of why people should study philosophy?
The narrative that it's untraceable was pushed far and wide within popular culture around it's inception. I would expect lay people, and even HN users who aren't heavily involved in that space, to retain that perception.
That looks quite useful. I noticed it wants a specific version of mcrypt. On Alpine Linux most of my nodes I see libmcrypt-2.5.8-r9. On VoidLinux it is 2.5.8_3. Are there by any chance plans to allow using openssl as an alternative?
Übermensch: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%9Cbermensch
You may be surprised both by

1. how many people don’t “hang out” in social media culture, and only circulate on there with family and peers using everyday idioms and emoji/abbreviation; if they use social media at all,

2. how many different, disjoint online cultures there are. Many things widely circulated on reddit and adjacent communities may never surface on some FB mom’s group

People maintain much more different lives from each other than you seem to assume, even among those that who are “terminally online” or that “hang out on social media”
Yeah, it's a summary and “Asian, Native American, Native Alaskan, 2 or more races, Pacific islander, etc." didn't have very many samples so they grouped them.

There's more detail in the reports I linked, both offender and victim.

Notably one of the items has this warning note:

"! Interpret with caution. Estimate is based on 10 or fewer sample cases, or coefficient of variation is greater than 50%."

As this is survey data so like polling they have to multiply responses to get the final answer and once you start subdividing by victim demographic and crime type and offender demographic, you're hitting the limits of what useful info you can extract without it just being random noise.
"Don't you know who I am? Google me!"

Works equally well in job interviews, dates, and getting in to clubs.
Not to mention that it excludes the b5, and saying that's not a substantial part of the RS top 500 is laughable. So really what they're saying is b2 can go to hell.
"6 figures" starts from 100000. In almost any US metro area this is not a lot of money. For example in Boston $100k means a frugal lifestyle. Not poverty, but very far from luxury either. Bay area on $100k? Ouch! I am not dismissing low six figures as a low salary, but given a choice that the author has I would settle at a much cheaper COL area.

If the comp is >$250k it would be another story. Personally I would still choose a very comfortable setup in a low COL area and spend the rest on investments and travel, but at least comfortable life in an expensive location is an option in this case. My 2c.
Why is this better? Is conciseness always preferred? Is it better or preferable to have a shared syntax that works across languages and tools?

Most importantly, what are the consequences of creating a custom language that only works in a narrow situation?
Found a wired version
https://www.instructables.com/DIY-3D-Printed-Headphones/
While I agree that Medium is mostly clickbait and SEO optimised content with no added value I think paying SO would make more sense. There are black sheeps within the answers, but SO definitely helped me a lot when looking for solutions.

But would it make sense? It's a cooperartive platform. How would a payment system look like? It should benefit the community, the people writing answers, but also the question authors. But what would be the impact on the writing quality? People would spam the platform in order to get rewarded? I don't see how a payed answer-question community would work and I guess Quora is a good example how it went into the wrong direction.
If you have the right to free movement but the government requires someone licensed to operate for the vast majority of ways of efficient free movement, that's just infringing on the right to free movement in a clever and devious way while saying "well you could walk!"

It kind of reminds me of the states where you need a license/permit to acquire a gun, "but you could acquire an antique muzzleloader without one" so the mental gymnastics justify it as not an infringement.
Ruby 3.1 provides a built-in middle ground for this use case: https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/master/IO/Buffer.html