skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think 18 days ago you might have said something to the the tune of you’d never do business with Apple again. You changed your mind fast. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32188366
Does that include the Apple M1 / M2 lines?
> Trump said peacefully go to the capitol.

If that were the _only_ thing he did, he'd be in no trouble. You need to look at the whole picture, not crop out everything incriminating if you want to actually be able to see.

He knew they were armed, knew they were violent, ramped up their anger and pointed them at the Capitol.

He also very likely worked with radical paramilitary outfits like the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers and a few others that planned and executed violent attacks on the Capitol.

Additionally, he refused to call off his supporters or to send in effective police or military until hours too late (or never really, last I heard only Pence did, and Trump never did).

> Is our country so fragile that occupying 1 building brings the whole system down?

Pretty much, yes. Our democracy is in many ways set up on the honor system.

Trump and his conspirators planned to delay certification of the vote past the deadline and get the outcome of the election voted on by the House (in a special one-vote-per-state vote). This goes in tandem with their recruiting false electors, pressuring state legislatures, falsely asking the DOJ to announge phony investigations, etc.
This is why .unwrap() should have been named .or_panic(). The current wording makes it sound innocuous, even if you know what it does.
I so badly wish these things had TrackPoints :( the patents have expired...
Funny fanboy
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reversible_computing
Not really since a court can overturn a verdict without a second trial by jury. A jury nullification can't be overturned by a court.

You'd have to abolish double jeopardy if you wanted equivalence.
Amazing! Props to the creators, incredible idea.
I'mremindedofthehistoricalobservationthattheRomanswroteandreadlatinwithnospaces,makingCaesaralinguisticgeniusforthefeatofeasilyreadingletterswithoutspeakingoutloud,whenIreadabsolutistcommentsonwhitespacelikethis.

Editor fonts which replace spaces and tabs with what are essentially the appropriate periods or similar make this not a merely hypothetical or anachronistic point.
The cost of storing energy in batteries is truly enormous when talking about large amounts (for example two weeks of U.S. total energy usage); this would probably costs trillions of dollars. But instead if you stored this in caverns or convert it to ammonia or another fuel... the storage cost will be a small fraction of this.
Is 7.62x39 a problem here too?
You keep enumerating words that I will never put in my CV lest employers know that I have been paid to suffer at their contact.
Cool foe these folks who turned their luck around, but it's mentally exhausting having hope at this point - I'm at peace with my mediocrity.
Currency is propped up - easy to fall.

They have shown themselves to be blackmailers with energy - no one will trust them again. The war will make Europe less dependent on Russian energy.

Steady gains - I wouldn't say so as they had to retreat from the whole northern Ukraine. In my opinion, Russia lost the war after first week or two. They bet everything on quick collapse of Ukrainian army and now that it did not happen, they are in a war they want to fight with peacetime army against an 40 million country that is fully mobilizing. It's a losing fight for Russia.

How much aid did China send to Russia? Answer is very little to none.

Reason why I feel Russia will collapse is that usually after major defeats, empires fall. We have various factions already jockeying for position and I bet that people like Kadyrov wouldn't mind carving their own part of Russia (independent Chechnya). After Russia depletes their army and manpower in a futile war against Ukraine we can see various other national movements come up. Especially if/when Putin dies.
Java does this with checked exceptions and it’s a huge hassle to work with.
∞ * .1 = ∞

But the 25TB you showed above is a better prospect.
Etymology by itself is not going to be useful. As one more flashcard, another pillar, additional context, they will to deepen your understanding. It is creating more inter-connections between your neurons.
DDG censors too much.
I'm sorry for what you went through. When one person is giving more that the other relationships can be a real struggle. I've been there I gave 110% and it scared someone off. The entire thing felt awful.

Some years later I found my wife and she responds very differently. She would love a note every day. Any attention I give her is welcomed.

I hope things work out for you.
Probably the real value is even worse than the expected value, because money has diminishing returns to happiness.
I'm uncertain where I stand on this but I'm going to give a shot at a less dismissive answer than most of the replies so far.

There's a very abstract argument that goes like this:
* "Orthogonality thesis": an arbitrarily smart agent could in theory value ~anything, e.g. maximize Facebook's valuation (say as measured by some specific dataset published by S&P).
* "Instrumental convergence thesis": most things that you might conceivably value are easier to optimize if you have a lot of power and resources (e.g. if you just run S&P, and hey maybe also control the worlds militaries so you can ensure nobody challenges that).
* Belief in the power of intelligence: it's theoretically possible to be much more capable at ~anything than the most capable human just by thinking better and faster, including building even better AIs. Eventually some human will build an agent that does that, and plausibly this will happen in the current century.
* Alignment problem: just because we make something doesn't automatically mean it wants exactly what we want, and in fact getting it to share our values is hard. Children disagree with parents, human values aren't those of natural selection, and ML language models repeat white supremacist ideas about Black people from their Internet training data.

Extrapolate out these points - which FWIW I find individually plausible - and you get doom: sooner or later humanity loses control of its destiny to whatever superintelligence we stumble on first, which in the worst case re-uses our atoms for something else (digits in some high-density storage representation that meets the loss function's technical criterion for Facebook's S&P valuation) about even in the best case seems fairly dystopian (whatever human Zuckerberg would actually want).

Now this is all pretty scifi and that's about all there was to it a few decades ago, but more recently we've started hitting ~parity milestones (chess, Go, protein folding, translation, arguably even fiction and visual art) that many experts once thought would require fully general human-level intelligence. It's clear to me that we haven't built that yet, but (as I said in another comment upthread) it also seems to me that our models are advancing in capability much more rapidly than we are gaining the ability to understand their internals or make guarantees of any kind about their worst-case or out-of-training-distribution behavior. Seems entirely sane to be worried by that trajectory and to start thinking seriously about how it might connect to the scary abstract speculations.

(edited for typos)
> If you're going to be a vegan, then presumably you care about non-human consciousness. So what's wrong with a future with flourishing AI and without humanity?

Not necessarily anything, but a pretty mainstream view now is that dangerous AIs need not be conscious (and indeed, that AIs can still be dangerous even if it's somehow impossible for an AI to be conscious). So you could imagine futures in which an AI conquers the world but has no experiences and can't either flourish or fail to flourish.

A computer virus is a familiar existing example of software that can be dangerous but that could probably not be said to flourish, even if it spreads widely, accomplishes everything it's programmed to do, and persists indefinitely. So we could envision dangerous AIs that are like today's computer viruses but that are also programmed to cause some kind of effect in the outside world, and that have some ability to learn and adapt so that it's difficult to prevent the effect and difficult to remove or deactivate the virus. That could be pretty dangerous to have active anywhere on the Internet, but still probably couldn't be said to flourish.
Life Didn't Start with the 'Primordial Soup'
If our leaders can break the law without consequence, it undermines everything. The rich and powerful in the US need to be under _more_ scrutiny, not less.
Does the door open to the other side, which is an all-white jury finding Ruben Carter guilty?
Modern generations have been influenced by the Romantics, who, amongst other things, put forward the idea that self-sacrificing marriage is actually less noble than purely passionate love. This evolved into the notion that a marriage requires consistent passion, and that if you don't have it, something is wrong.

But it turns out that marriage is really just a partnership and relationship, and all different kinds of people have different styles and interpretations of what that is and how it works for them. Some people need a lot of passion, some people need a lot of stability, some may need both, or neither.

But there is definitely something to the notion that good relationships don't come easy. People are all flawed in different ways, and sometimes people need help to work through those flaws in order to have successful relationships. Plus, a marriage may involve some long term expensive investments, like a mortgage, pets, children. So "saving your marriage" might actually be quite a rational and emotionally intelligent act, if all partners are amenable to it. Best-case scenario: you end up with a long-term loving partnership and a wonderful life; worst-case, you don't. Seems like it's worth saving?
Apples M1 only worked because everything is in one chip. Very different from the goals of framework. There aren't any vendors offering M1 competitors either.
> How am I supposed to work?

Whatever happened to the man pages, y'know.
I have the same question. Looking at the original post, the impetus seems to be "save hundreds on Sonos". I'm not that impressed with Sonos so this is like saying save hundreds on Bose.

"This laid all the technical groundwork to prove that the Symfonisk speaker should work as a general purpose mono speaker amp." Then he goes on a crazy mod and solder run that almost no one could or should ever do.

He wanted to power some ceiling speakers. I'd rather just buy a TPA 3116 amp with bluetooth and go from there or use echo dots like you say.

I've got the DAMGOO in my greenhouse and it sounds damn fine. $25.

https://www.amazon.com/Bluetooth-Amplifier-DAMGOO-Technique-...
I was working at an ISP on 9/11. We were still online but none of our customers were getting anything (dialup modems) ... so people started calling our tech support number to read them the news. Or to get info about loved ones. That was a long day. I left a different person than I showed up as. Didn't we all though.
Imagine how expressing daily gratitude might change who you are.

If you say things enough, you come to believe in them and act to make them true. Even if you wrote such notes every day, and never gave them to your partner, the act of writing them changes you. Perhaps, even, into a better partner.
There was definitely consequences. Trump was voted out of office as a result of the various crimes the people witnessed. Also there was an impeachment that failed to convict.

Also I'm not sure the prosecution of any particular individual necessarily outweighs the need to keep our justice system politically unbiased. Again I'd much prefer people go free rather than FBI and other agencies being used in a politically biased manner to undermine democracy. I'm not saying that is what is happening here, although it could be the case.
Also on Linux most distros have thermald installed and you can change the config to limit the max temperature to defacto throttle power usage. Alternatively, you can modify the RAPL limits to cap power usage directly to taste: https://community.frame.work/t/thermal-management-on-linux-w...
Saw to many scifi movies where AI becomes sentient and takes over like Skynet in the Terminator movies.
Did so in my comment to which you originally replied.

To be clear, I have no idea what argument you believe Bostrom is most famous for and hold no particular brief for him as a thinker. But, repeating myself, the AI risk argument that he makes in Superintelligence and that Yudkowsky etc make is one that assigns a high probability to disaster. It's not a secularized Pascal's Wager based on multiplying a low probability by dubious infinities.
> Yeah I agree. Anki has a failure mode for me that I eventually accumulate >5000 flash cards and a review session can take an hour or more.

You don't really need to keep up with Anki's review sessions, even a partial session is very effective when you have lots and lots of cards. The tradeoff is that you might not actually maintain 100% recall of all items, but you'll recall most of them, and the scheduling algorithm will space out the items that you do recall even further.
I've served as a juror before and most people are just trying to find excuses get kicked out.
I used to think like this. But after using an M1 Macbook Pro, I've changed my opinion. This is true all-day battery. You never have to think about battery anymore. It makes a big difference to my workflow, even though I'm literally 24 hours at home, never more than a few feet away from a wall socket.

I'm willing to put up with all the downsides of this laptop and the OS, just because of the battery life.
I think your concept of what is possible with languages is limited and you are suffering from either narrow tunnel vision or some sort of emotional overinvestment in what you've put effort into. I don't know what the right answer is. It could be as complicated as something like SEL4 does, it could be like typescript is for JavaScript, it could be annotation based like dialyzer is for Erlang. Not all of these are perfect, of course, but the point is is a wide open space of tradeoffs in safety, performance, and ergonomics (including ability to reason about scary vulnerabilities that rust can't auto fix like race conditions or business logic errord) between "what rust looks like" and "c level wild west".
Yes, but how would jury nullification come into play there?

A jury can’t decide to make something a crime, they can only choose to not punish a crime.
> similarly weaponizes the FBI

This is a big, fairly bad assumption, seemingly based on nothing.

Biden has been, if anything, too unwilling to push for any investigation into Trump's misdeeds. The DOJ did essentially nothing to look at J6 until the House committee shamed them into it, for instance.
Eh, it doesn’t feel like work for me. I really enjoy my partner, she enjoys me, and I don’t think we have to do very much “work” to maintain that.

If I started writing literal daily notes to my wife, she’d be very concerned something was wrong. Then she’d ask why I’m wasting my time writing a note when I could have done… literally annoying else more productive lol
Is it Windows-only? README only mentions building with Visual Studio
The U.S. uses 40% of its corn crop to make ethanol. If the famine situation actually happens this will shift to food for people.
I used to think this as well, but the all day battery life on M1 really made me realize how much of a mental tether outlets used to be. It seems pretty minor, but not worrying about getting a seat at the {coffee shop/airport/lounge} next to an outlet makes working on the go a much more attractive option now.
Allowing for complementary sign up options besides google would most likely encourage more people that use no google services evaluating the platform, myself included.

Something to keep in mind in case you notice more people bouncing off your register page more than you'd normally expect.
My guess is, storing the whole index is expensive.

So they just look at popular (or profitable) queries.
> The reward in my experience is totally worth it.

What is the reward?
Imagine how it feels to _receive_ daily gratitude for your part in the hamster wheel
Since we're being party poopers, it's worth noting that if your relationship fails it is, by definition, because you are unattractive to your partner. If that's the case, then yes attention from an unattractive person is a major turn-off. That's hardly a great revelation, but even so that kind of common sense appears to be sorely lacking amongst many persons.
I think it's odd we don't think of other limitations of products the same way. Put another way, why don't we just say it can't do it.

Example, we don't say a jet ski has a current speed limitation of 80 mph, we say it can go 80, but not 81. It's a simple fact. No promise that it will be faster tomorrow, because that's not what it is, it's not its future self.

It's like they're combining startup it will always be better after you invest more money with the reality of what "is" means.
Nobody knows whether or not training a NN is fair use. If it were ruled to be not fair use then it would basically shut down a large chunk
of ML research in the US, as it's not just Copilot that is training on copyrighted data. All the large language models require copyrighted data such as web crawls as there is just not enough public domain material around.

So even if you are right, and courts rule that training is not fair use, it seems likely that all the big tech companies would lobby Congress to restore the prior state of affairs, as not having an ML industry is somewhat of a national security issue if the rest of the world is going full steam ahead on making Skynet.
Revolut still doesn’t have a UK banking license, so you’re not protected up to £85k like you are with a normal bank.
Eric Schmidt, the former Google chairman, told Reuters in a recent interview that high-end processors should have kill-switches.

“Knowing where the chips go is probably a very good thing. You could for example, on every chip put in essentially a public private key pair, which authenticates it and allows it to work”.

https://www.reuters.com/technology/chip-challenge-keeping-we...

What he won’t tell is that this is already a reality, as I learned after having my air-gapped system and Pixel phone wiped remotely for doing academic research on wireless “silent speech interfaces”.

Anyone doing research on this area be cautious of sabotage when using US designed CPUs (AMD/INTEL/QUALCOMM/APPLE/ARM), as the microcode, SMM and firmware of your system may be manipulated to mess up your computations. Ask your own Nation to stop trusting Silicon Valley and make your own silicon supply chain and tech services.
I used to think of this as an utter failure of the system, but lingering on this for a while: if the vast majority of citizens (= people who can meaningfully participate in the society) thinks lynching is a good thing, the jury nullification is only a step behind making lynching OK in the books for that group.

Of course there could be upper laws blocking them from making it an official stance, but it really feels like fighting a reality with theorical boundaries.

The issue is not the abuse of a system hack, and probably more around changing people's mind (which can take centuries and get reversed in a few years...)
i actually googled that, and it c'est was not returned and i got a bunch of se. whatchagonnado?
To me this sounds similar to the old saying "Choose a job you love, and you will never have to work a day in your life"

I've found this to simply mean that you enjoy the work you put in. Gamers can spend hours getting good at a game. Few would call it practice, they'd call it play. However, whatever you call it you need it to get good.

Whatever that thing is that you put into a relationship, it's needed.
Why didn't you just move the 16GB of RAM from the 11th Gen model to the 12th Gen model? Both use DDR4 after all, don't they?
Reprehensible...really? There's lots of that in the world, pretty sure this isn't it. They put the memory difference right there in the stats, it's not like they are hiding it.

Lighten up a bit. :)
Title should reflect this is about some OEM and not Intel's offering per se.
> Trump was voted out of office as a result of the various crimes the people witnessed.

That's not enough. If it's all just politics, then it's part of the game. We need law enforcement to stand up and do their job. "Some people are pretty sure I'm a criminal" isn't the same thing as a court of law saying it.

> Also there was an impeachment that failed to convict.

That's barely a consequence. It did essentially nothing.

> Also I'm not sure the prosecution of any particular individual necessarily outweighs the need to keep our justice system politically unbiased.

The justice system isn't seen as politically unbiased by the people who will yell about Trump getting prosecuted anyway. If they're going to cry bias regardless, let's drag the evidence into a court of law and shine some sunlight on it.
Who of us on Napster got paid for sharing our music collections with other people? Oh that's right: nobody.

Most people who look at the internet as a place for profit feel they own the videos they upload. So if you reupload a video they deleted, they copyright strike you. Do you know how much of a violation that is? Once you upload something to the internet you no longer own it. That's been the way it's been for years. Now these people come along and try to stop you from mirroring things or having it be lost to time, and I bet you support that, DON'T YOU?

Oh BOY I want to interview you in voice. WOW.
I am still skeptical. One thing is to recognize common roots, for example "to live" is "vivere" in Italian and "vivir" in Spanish, another it is to know that they are both coming from the latin verb vīvĕre.
It is sufficient to recognize the commonality, without getting to the etymology of the word, which, in practical term, does not help.
> crimes that are in principle clearly wrong, despite what a local community believes.

Who has the magical power to know which crimes these are that are "in principle clearly wrong" with such certainty that they can override the community's beliefs? We're all fallible humans and nobody has a special private line to The Truth.
Yes but a judge can overrule it. A judge cannot however overrule a not-guilty verdict and find the defendant guilty.
Given that so much of modern education happens in large-group settings, it seems hard to apply SRS principles to it. A group of students will be a lot farther from 100% recall of all items than any individual student might be, and the items that require review will correspondingly differ.
Why is air-conditioning in hot places evil, but nobody bats an eye about the need to run heat to make cold places livable?

People keep saying that it's "irresponsible" for people to live in places like Phoenix where you need A/C to survive the summer, but it's totally fine, for example, for Canada to exist, despite the fact that virtually every Canadian would die if they had to go without winter heat.

Nobody says that it's irresponsible for people to live in Canada (or Minnesota, or Maine, or Norway, or any other cold place).

Why is it only cooling that draws such moral outrage?
I think it's more likely it was astroturf/COINTELPRO related.
I haven't used Sonos and I am also wondering what is so great about it that one would go to all this trouble to get it on the cheap.
> unfortunately I'm not at liberty to be more specific.

Gun to the head change your mind?
Good time to switch to a search engine that
has code snippets, coding tutorials, AI code completion, AI blog writing, a useful yelp app, great privacy, gives control over the sources and apps I want to see and summarizes pros/cons for products.

you.com

(founder here :)
Pelosi’s Taiwan visit should prompt Beijing to start reunification process