skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Not arguing with you that it takes a considerable amount of time to prepare and clean-up a home cooked meal. But as someone who is not living alone (have a wife and kids), I'd say you probably have a lot more free time than you think you do, and I'm not sure that cooking just for yourself takes up any more time than it would cooking more food, for more people with varying tastes, allergies, etc. Add to the fact that most of the people being cooked for (kids) are basically freeloaders, I think that people living alone really have less excuse to eat healthy.
Cooking is literally as simple as following a recipe.
One of the issues they mention is that that a person needed paystubs to send in to the government as documentation for their subsidized housing. Even if the government has nice paper options as a backup (around here they usually do, at least) the person will still need to get into their email. Google didn't create the problem, but unfortunately an eMail address has become a centralized point of communication for lots of things.

We probably need some sort of state-sponsored digital inbox for these kinds of documents. The thing that makes Google useful -- that it is a "reasonably" secure location to stash documents -- also makes it really easy to get locked out. There are recovery options, but it isn't obvious how a system could be secure while still allowing recovery for a user who elects to not set any recovery options up.

Perhaps the government could do a better job (at least they have things like social security cards and birth certificates, and have been dealing with the last resort case where these aren't available for longer than any of us have been alive). They also aren't constrained by things like a need to make a profit, and they don't even really need us to be able to communicate out from this inbox, it could be just a one-way channel for the reception of documents, which would avoid some annoying issues ala people using their gmails to harass others.
I've long been an advocate for a 4 year program that coincides with the entire high school experience.

Students should grow, harvest and cook their own food. While doing so, every subject should be involved.

Chemistry and Biology are the more obvious ones for sake of soil testing, plant biology, cross pollination, and composting. Chemistry also should be involved in cooking.

Math and science classes for sake of grids, spacing, growth charting, control groups, etc as well as conservation.

Economics for understanding all of the costs involved from planting, to harvesting, to buying equipment and hiring labor, shipping to grocery stores, disposal of food that isn't purchased. Additionally, budgeting for ingredients to prepare meals.

History can bring a lot of this to life by studying agricultural history and the accompanying economics, including the world events surrounding them. I'm sure there's plenty of literature go to along with it as well.

And you can even get into computer science, engineering and robotics by setting up FarmBot's in schools, which are open source. Students can learn to use them as designed as well as program new functionality.

Help students learn by making it both beneficial, relatable and connected.
I always wondered about the logic here. They purport to be reputable but use phone number randomizers and shifting domains. If they don't want to be treated as spam then they should act professionally which leaves the decisions to the users directly.
Should cost of production be substracted from AMD revenue for apple to apples comparison? Intel has in house production, why AMD pays premium to TSMC.
> Dinner takes about 15 mins to prepare, on average.

This doesn't include time to meal plan, grocery shop, and clean dishes. Also, 15 minutes isn't a ton of time, but it isn't nothing.
Thanks for the kind words, and awesome that you were on a DGC team!

Absolutely, there is a ton of really interesting controls, ML and general software quality work for us to do.
What makes you think anyone can have access to objective reality? What makes you think a first assertion holds more weight than a second? What makes you think bubbles are not a thing? What makes you think certain phrases don't immediately betray how little someone knows about people outside of their bubble?

I know enough people outside of the heteronormative experience to know that nothing about playing with Barbies pushes people toward being trans. It's reminiscent of the classic "violent games make kids violent" line. That's not the case at all -- rather violent kids are attracted more to violent games. The causality is completely incorrect and displays an obvious naivete paired with a pre-existing ideological bias.
I am glad that you are building this. Often websites are built for a US market and then try to shoehorn EU usage into it. Sometimes that works, but aside from things like currency issues you also often end up with a user base/community that is just primarily interested in the US, with very little activity around other locations. I think it would be great to have this kind of thing specifically tailored to an EU community.
Your "run-time" code with iterators vs with a hand made for loop tends to result in the same set of instructions. Often the iterator usage will also enable optimizations that make the loop faster.

* https://github.com/mike-barber/rust-zero-cost-abstractions

* https://carette.xyz/posts/zero_cost_abstraction/

* https://ruudvanasseldonk.com/2016/11/30/zero-cost-abstractio...
Flamboyantly colored uniforms of the time also helped prevent friendly fire. Each volley of musket fire filled the air with a white smoke cloud. [1][2]

[1] https://d1w82usnq70pt2.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/202...

[2] https://www.goonhammer.com/goonhammer-historicals-firing-in-...
Outlook crashing? No way!
For the Supreme Court to make rulings, there needs to be a lawsuit. Regardless, there was a ruling last year[0] that said the CDC didn't have the authority for a nationwide moratorium.

In addition, because this is LA doing this, not the federal government, the Supreme Court is less likely to take up an appeal should there be an actual lawsuit. They tend to prefer country/city lawsuits to stay in the state.

---

[0]: Alabama Association of Realtors v. Department of Health and Human Services

https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/26/politics/supreme-court-ruling...

https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/alabama-associat...
Which direction are you betting on lab-grown meats?
Just to clarify, Zen 3 has been out since November 2020. (Zen 3+ earlier this year.)

Zen 4 is not yet formally announced (at least not the full technical details), so presumably that's what you mean.

Intel's biggest remaining advantage is if you want a laptop with Thunderbolt. It should theoretically be available on AMD laptops, but I don't know if any have become available yet.

EDIT: See below, Zen 4 is announced but not yet available, so performance and final details are pending (including models, performance, etc.)
I don't think we can conclude it's an intelligence failure. Perhaps the intelligence community already knew?
Users could still add political senders to a personal block list, right? It seems very sensible to say that emails that are from the prevailing legal authority should not be filtered as spam (i.e. digital junk mail) by default.
Smartcar | Remote with CA or NY | Full-Time | https://smartcar.com
The connected car API for developers.

Here are our open roles:

- Senior Software Engineer - Back-End for the Platform Team: https://jobs.lever.co/smartcar/ca3e8f27-e47d-4d6b-83e5-d7680...

- Senior Software Engineer - Back-End for the Platform Team: https://jobs.lever.co/smartcar/ca3e8f27-e47d-4d6b-83e5-d7680...

- Software Engineer - Infrastructure (All Levels): https://jobs.lever.co/smartcar/f0b58189-f119-482c-a52a-2d983...

- Software Engineer II - Back-End for the Experience Team: https://jobs.lever.co/smartcar/decbba58-18c1-44c6-8ff1-3ec4a...

- Senior Product Manager: https://jobs.lever.co/smartcar/f4c691ba-f038-4ab2-9f21-a7967...

- VP of Sales: https://jobs.lever.co/smartcar/98230f27-1936-441e-8b02-52acb...

Feel free to reach out to our internal recruiting team directly!

danny@smartcar.com
Vetted | Backend Engineer, Data Engineer | Remote | Full Time
Vetted is a product search engine that helps people be savvy shoppers. Our technology automates the intensive research process required to make smart purchasing decisions in today’s overwhelming shopping experience. We recently raised our series A and have an ambitious vision to rewire commerce to empower consumers and direct the world’s purchasing intent.

The Senior Software Engineer/Tech Lead on the Search Infrastructure team is responsible for maintaining and developing Python and Typescript code that Vetted's search infrastructure runs on. Accordingly, you will ideally be very strong in Python and either be strong in Typescript or willing to learn. No front-end development experience is required, though full-stack experience is a slight plus

More details here: https://jobs.lever.co/vetted/b176bb67-1e6d-4e66-aa6d-b34c836...

Email me at stuart@vetted.ai if interested.
The Mental Health Treatment Obstacle Course
What you describe is still an observational study, just a very expensive one now. It's still quite possible you'd fail to measure something important you hadn't thought of.

Better to spend some of that budget instead on a randomised controlled trial but there are likely issues with getting people to follow their prescribed diets to the letter
I clearly stated that "most people I know are careful to not throw around the word "depression". The rest of what I wrote syncs with this perspective. Not sure what you read.
I see. It's really unclear why you're engaging in such a hostile way throughout this thread, but it's really not in the intended spirit of discussion here.

Apparently you did continue reading, but in case it wasn't clear, it was an abusive environment, and sharing my personal decision not to be a parent again is just my attempt to share one perspective on what it means to have or not have kids when working through one's career.

Based on what you've written elsewhere in this thread, I hope you find some peace.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
I've had cataracts since birth. It's a relatively dense area in the middle of my field of view. My brain interpolates information there as well as possible. Because of this I never see a stain. It's funny to spot the bugs in this process though. For example, objects may become visible because of eye movement that were previously invisible because they were completely obscured by cataracts.
Very interesting!

I did not know about Pairing Functions prior to your post (again, very interesting!) -- it makes me wonder if there are pairing functions for pairing functions -- in other words,

recursive pairing functions

For lack of a better term...

In other words, does there exist a pairing function (or recursive pairing function, again, for lack of a better term!) -- which can collapse not just N dimensions to N-1 dimensions -- but some high dimensional number N -- down to 1 -- or even 0 (like how simultaneously weird, yet interesting, yet, let's not kid ourselves, "weird" <g>, would something like that be?)

>"But there's no implication that the simplification from N dimensions to N-1 dimensions is any easier..."

Point taken, and it's a very valid point(!), and I don't mean to offend you by saying what I'm going to say next (you're a nice guy and all!) -- but:

I don't care about easy!

I care about possible!

Nothing that is significantly interesting at a given point in time in Physics -- is ever easy(!)

But if something is possible -- or even just on the verge of moving from "previously thought impossible" to moving to "highly improbable and extremely super difficult to do, if it could be done at all" but not outright "impossible" -- then sign me up! I want to learn more!

So, in conclusion, you are right, you are completely correct(!) -- There is no implication that the simplification from N dimensions to N-1 dimensions is any easier than recovering the information that went into a black hole from its Hawking radiation!

But... wouldn't it be interesting to do some research around that idea?

?

I mean, the absolute worst (the absolute worst!) that could happen in undertaking such research -- is that other questions, other entirely different areas of future research -- might be discovered in that undertaking!

It would be sort of like if someone wanted to win the Nobel Prize in Physics for research in some complex subject matter, couldn't win the Nobel Prize in Physics for that research because the problems were so complex that they couldn't be solved -- but as a result of that research, new research questions in all sorts of other diverse areas of science became apparent, as a result of those questions, new research into those areas was performed, new breakthroughs were had, and the guy who originally wanted to win the Nobel Prize in Physics -- wound up winning the Nobel Prize in Biology(!) -- or got some other great reward in life (invented something interesting and became a Billionaire?) -- as a result!

In other words, the scientific research equivalent -- of a startup "pivot"...

Anyway, some interesting links, and you are right about it being extremely difficult to recover information that went into a black hole via its Hawking radiation...

But if someone had already accomplished that... then it would be no fun -- to try to figure out how to do it...

In other words, if someone already did it... then it wouldn't be a challenge anymore, would it?

I mean, proving Fermat's Last Theorem -- is no longer challenging anymore, now that it has been proven, is it? (Thanks a lot, Andrew Wiles! <g>)
Systemiq | Analytics Director, Fullstack Developers, Data Scientists (Python Modeller), https://www.systemiq.earth/careers/job-opportunities/ | HYBRID, EU, Amsterdam, London, Munich, Paris

Systemiq, the system-change company, was founded in 2016 to drive the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement, by transforming markets and business models in five key systems: nature and food, materials and circularity, energy, urban areas, and sustainable finance. A certified B Corp, Systemiq combines strategic advisory with high-impact, on-the-ground work, and partners with business, finance, policy-makers and civil society to deliver system change. Systemiq has offices in Brazil, France, Germany, Indonesia, the Netherlands and the UK. Find out more at https://www.systemiq.earth/

Systemiq is hiring an analytics director to lead current and future efforts in quantitative analysis and data science. We're also hiring fullstack developers (Python and web, data visualization) and data scientists to build data and decision tools that leverage our domain expertise in system change for sustainability.

Full job descriptions at https://www.systemiq.earth/careers/job-opportunities/
Good point. I'll bring it up on my next visit, though it's been .. boy, 8 years since i had one last? Nevertheless, doesn't hurt to ask on routine visits.
What I hated about that book is that it's full of exercises (good!) but no answers are provided (bad!). I really don't understand the mentality behind providing such good exercises with no way to check your answers - and they're not the kind of problems that you can verify your answer to, either.
It has one chapter that sumarizes refactorings.
Enterprise patterns or design patterns in general are about software design. IMHO design patters are the worst way to learn about design in software.
It appears that nothing at all is going on. The old (“removed”) data seems to be forecasts, by date of forecast, of Q2 GDP. The new graph is forecasts of Q3 GDP. This is very cleverly hidden in the title of the graph, where no reader could possibly be expected to look. I imagine the forecasters didn’t start forecasting Q3 GDP in time for, say, an April 7 data point to ever have existed in the first place. So I would rank the surface appearance of sinisterness at approximately zero.

But maybe it is indeed even less sinister. The Atlanta Fed GDPNow site seems to have fairly extensive historical data linked near the bottom of the page.

So really the only thing to see here is that the Atlanta Fed has been reusing the same file name for updated versions of their PDF deck instead of making a new filename every week.
That's unfortunate. I'm lucky enough to have studied my target language on & off for over a decade and one of my main issues at this point is vocabulary. But you're not wrong - it's not useful for everyone.
I'd argue that it's the holy grail of business, not the bible. I realize you weren't claiming it is.

Disruption is overrated. It's a lot harder to do than it is to think about or wish for. Neither Nvidia or AMD have "disrupted" Intel. Only Apple came close to that and even then only in theory, and only in their own walled garden market. If they were selling M-chips to everyone, you MIGHT have disruption, but that's easier said than done because there's an enormous list of tasks that need executed to a T that has to be completed. Everyone wants to be the disruptor, usually without the vision, talent, or execution, when "just making a lot of money" is also a fine goal that seems to be overlooked. Nvidia was always more likely to disrupt Intel with their ARM chips, but again, easier to dream about than execute. Hasn't happened. It's not that easy nor is it truly done often.

Especially the concept of sustainably making money is dismissed outright by nearly everyone. Here in the US it's all about the "bottom line" and quarterly executive bonuses. They love their reorgs. It's a broken model. While the Japanese, such as at Toyota, do a good job out of national honor. We can't compete with that sense of national pride. Western employees are broken culturally, and largely due to decades of watching the rich take it all as their prospects dwindle. Most of it lay at the feet of management though, as we made quality stuff in decades past.

I'd prefer to execute in a disciplined manner with quality output, something I could be proud of and fairly compensated for. Sustainably "just getting rich", Toyota style. That's not good enough in the US, we prefer booms and bust, then ending up broke. Best case for an American company is ending up a zombie corporation reliant on endless bailouts while claiming they're too big to fail. Even financial organizations that do nothing but sign documents as "product", reissuing Federal Reserve loans at usury rates, and would leave no gap upon disappearing overnight. To be replaced with a more rational actor that will be more responsible with such an easy way to make money.

At some point the Americans are going to have to realize that disruption can also be simply be delivering quality, reliably for decades. Toyota vs GM/Ford is a perfect example, as they were definitely disrupted. Being the market leader, dominating while getting rich is too longterm for us though.

Apologies for this excessive screed. This topic always bugs me. If I'm wrong, I'd appreciate it someone correct me so I can be a bit less pessimistic.
if you do cross platform(win,mac,linux), cmake is a good choice

if you do linux 98% of the time then make is good enough.

ninja does parallel build as good as 'make -j N' to me.

meson, bazel are also good, but I don't have huge projects to leverage.

all in all, make is what I use these days, solid, easy to read, get the job done.
They'll tolerate reading it on twitter?
Let this be a lesson: if you don't control your devices or apps, the smallest convenience can be sold back to you. It would be impossible to be this user-hostile if Spotify just sold mp3's.
Can somebody who has given this significant thought clearly walk me through the ramifications of eliminating intellectual property. Seems like an easy way to replace some lawyers with engineers.
I don’t know anything how to cook anything from fresh ingredients that takes just 15 minutes from entering the kitchen to going to the table to eat. It takes 7 minutes for my kettle to bring 1.5 L of water to boil. (Yay 120v…)

Instant oatmeal I guess? Anything requiring dairy or eggs won’t work.
The teacher from school or preschool will call from basically random phone. Possibly own phone. Or whatever office she is in phone. Camp counselor always calls from own phone which is fairly often different one then where you are supposed to call.

Neither of these calls often. Maybe once a year you get call like that. But when they call, you really want to pick up.
> "People who consumed more than 20% of daily calories from processed foods had a 28% faster decline in global cognition and a 25% faster decline in executive functioning compared to people who ate less than 20%,"

I wish they just showed a graph of "decline in cognition" vs "percentage of calories from processed foods" instead of making me try to parse the relevant information out of sentences like that. What 10% of my calories come from processed foods? I'm I completely safe or is the effect linear in percentage of calories or what?
There is an aspect of mimetic contagion to this phenomenon. For a primer on what this means, see: https://www.amazon.com/Wanting-Power-Mimetic-Desire-Everyday...
So does 1Password. However, the generator can be run standalone (not connected with an entry). In that case, the password is not saved, because there's no entry to save it to.

It does not offer to automatically create an entry, until after the login, so it's still quite possible to "fall through the cracks," which is what happened here.

Yeah, my bad. :P
Finally, I can make my own steamed hams.
How to build a digital wallet in less than a day
Ah thanks! "Lazy pulling" is what I was looking for. I was trying to find estargz (didn't remember the name) and I couldn't find a proper keyword to do it :P :D
Take a look at FreeBSD. Here’s what a typical Makefile looks like:

# $FreeBSD$

PACKAGE=runtime
PROG= setfacl
SRCS= file.c mask.c merge.c remove.c setfacl.c util.c

.include <bsd.prog.mk>

So, yeah, at least for code in C you can have something maintainable in make(1), it’s just you need to structure your project in a sensible way.
There is a strong aspect of mimetic contagion to this phenomenon. For a primer, see this book: https://www.amazon.com/Wanting-Power-Mimetic-Desire-Everyday...
I buy that argument. I am a 44 year old atheist and even in my life I've seen the difference in society from when being a Christian in the US was just something most people did, to now where we're all much more secular.

Religion's negatives get a lot more press than it's positives.
The Fallows of Medium Data