skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In regions with colder winters, it's typically a function of freeze/thaw cycles. Water gets inside cracks, freezes, and the expansion breaks up the pavement. Then it thaws and softens, and traffic knocks bits loose. Then more water gets in the now bigger cracks, it freezes again and the cycle repeats, but a little worse this time. Then again and again.
Close to double digit interest rates might not help either
To reach carbon neutrality you essentially have to decarbonize transportation, heating and cooling, industry, agriculture, and electricity. Electric vehicles don't lower quality of live, heat pumps don't lower quality of life either. Changes in how we power industry and agriculture also don't change quality of life. Electricity is the same no matter how it's produced. Once we reached this state we can start worrying about capturing excess carbon.

So the only argument for "this will lower quality of life" is that things might become more expensive. But renewable energy in fairly cheap, so I'm not convinced that on average quality of life will suffer. Some things will get more expensive, others will get cheaper.
I tried getting an interview for one of those LinkedIn posts and even though I had a really good starting point (successful internship within the last few months plus an internal referral from someone working in the group I applied for plus being a good fit based on my skills and education) I wasn't even invited for a first interview, only got a generic rejection by email.
So I don't think these postings are all real.
I meant stolen/lost. Ofc physical and digital keys are not the same but Satoshi's wallet is probably multisig wallet meaning in order to move bitcoins multiple keys need to be signed and my assumption is Satoshi does not have access to all the keys required for moving his coins.

But honestly I think there will never be direct evidence of somebody being Satoshi or in another words circumstantial evidence needs to be presented. Craig said he will share his bank statement of him buying bitcoin.org domain but I'm still waiting for it.

After all Craig seems like a perfect candidate for Satoshi; Craig uses British English like Satoshi used because Craig is an Australian, he is fluent in C and C++(Bitcoin was written in C++ and math code inside Bitcoin whitepaper was written in C), he used to teach C++ programming in an Australian university(all C++ programmers said to me that Bitcoin's codebase is amateur like it was written by some academic who never wrote code for practical use) this fits Craig and his professor like demeanour . And last but not least Craig spent his professional career researching computer security and computer networks again skills which were required in order for someone to design and derive Bitcoin.
So many if, else, case, while, whatever nested control flow, all in one procedure, that one can almost be sure, that one of those branches of execution will have a bug somewhere. Very short variable names, sometimes 1 character or 2 and pointer magic.

Looks like a prime example of badly readable code.
The top tools I would recommend for UI/UX design are Axure, Sketch and Adobe XD.

Pros:

-I like how easy it is to create prototypes with these tools. You can design without having to worry about coding or technical issues.

-These tools make it easier to create wireframes and interactive prototypes. You no longer need to worry about creating mockups using Photoshop or Illustrator because these tools allow you to create clickable prototypes that look like the real thing.

Cons:

-You may not be able to use these tools if your company has a license that doesn't allow you to use them (especially Adobe XD). Also, they can be expensive so if you're just starting out as a designer then it might not be worth it for now.

They help us a lot for our projects at ENOU Labs.
Sort of... I didn't get the impression he stayed at the Capitol because he thought it was the right thing for the country, but instead because he felt staying was the better option for his own power and legacy. I mean, I'll take it, but I'd prefer our leaders were slightly more principled than that.
> Here[1] is the entry for "House of Representatives".

Thank you for taking the time. Much appreciated.

> Instead, it sounds like you had the ability to continue Googling, but decided to let others do your research for you.

No. I did not decide to let others do the research.

I simply stopped doing the research. Didn't want to find out more, because deep knowlege of the House of Representatives does not add much value to my life. And neither is it a topic I'm interested in (like, I have spent hours reading and learning about comets because that's something I'm interested in, even though it too doesn't provide much tangible value to my life).

> That's like saying your time is more valuable than other people's time.

Wrong. It's like saying I don't want to spend too much time on this.

I never asked anybody else to do anything on my behalf. Frankly I never expected this to upset people.
It blows my mind people are spending $2000+ per month for a server they can get used for $4000-5000 one time only cost.

VMWare + Synology Business Backup + Synology C2 backup is our way of doing business and never failed us for over 7 years. Why do people spend so much money for cloud while they can host it themselves less than 5% of the cost? (2 year usage assumed).
These are both true - but neither requires service-oriented-architecture.

You can split up your applicaiton into chunks that are deployed on seperate hardware, and use different languages, without composing your whole architecture into microservices.

A monolith can still have a seperate database server and a web server, or even many different functions split across different servers which are horizontally scalable, and be written in both java and python.

Monoliths have had seperate database servers since the 80s (and probably before that!). In fact, part of these applications defining characteristics at the enterprise level is that they often shared one big central database, as often they were composed of lots of small applications that would all make changes to the central database, which would often end up in a right mess of software that was incredibly hard to de-pick! (And all the software writing to that database would, as you described, be written in lots of different languages). People would then come along and cake these central databases full of stored procedures to make magic changes to implement functionality that wasn't available in the legacy applications that they can't change because of the risk and then you have even more of a mess!
I'm not the previous poster, but just wanted to chime in that my husband and I just share a login and yeah, it works. Good enough for us! But Paprika definitely doesn't lend itself to sharing multiple recipes with others in any efficient manner.
WhatsApp boss says no to AI filters policing encrypted chat
The idea behind airflow is great. What sucks is people using it to do heavy processing. Maybe with serverless/k8s airflow could fan out the processing to a cluster to allow for flexibility. But then, I guess you end up re-writing spark et-al.
> all large corpse

Freudian slip? :)
One thing worth remembering, and that even a lot of socialists forget, is that Marx predicted this not out of some deep hate for capitalism.

The first half of the first chapter of the Communist Manifesto is Marx being a total fanboy for capitalism and it's capacity for transforming the world.

Marx predicted that capitalist competition, which he expressed admiration for, would be too successful, and that people would just fail to reign it in and deal with the result.

There's a conceptually very simple fix to the crises Marx predicted if he's otherwise right:

Share more of the value, and spread labour around if automation comes to reduce the need for labour to the extent he predicted, where, to paraphrase, both overproduction and lack of work becomes common.

It doesn't take equality to prevent it, just enough adjustment to smooth out the crises enough to prevent escalation.

Marx took capitalists own predictions about the efficiency of capitalist competition at face value, and simply asked what will happen if capitalism eventually runs out of new markets to expand into (temporarily or permanently) and responds by driving down margins, and his prediction of eventual revolution is predicated on the assumption that society will fail to apply those very simple fixes.

Ironically, then, if capitalism survives, it might be because the competitive pressures are not as strong as Marx believed.
Why is lying in public a good idea?

The memo was "leaked" by cnbc, so Pichai wasn't even doing what you say he did anyway.
11 hours wait to see a doctor for son’s broken foot in Canadian capital
Surely the only thing that matters is the BOM cost of the new screen?
Does anyone track stats for the hiring / want to be hired threads?
Same with tons of security incidents in general. It's the "swiss cheese model" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss_cheese_model).
I can't get anything good from DALLE-2. It seems so fcking stupid. Whatever I try, it gives me total BS, sometimes it just refuses to generate anything complaining about ToS violation.
Where SMBs Are with the Cloud
Historically, those cradles of civilization were exceedingly productive because some years the flood plains flooded, not in spite of it.
You can still do a ton of joining.

I’d start with a monolith, that’s a single app, single database, single point of ownership of the data model, and a ton of joins.

Then as services are added after the monolith they can still use the main database for ease of infra development, simpler backups and replication, etc. but those wouldn’t be able to be joined because they’re cross-service.
The real question is how soon will GPT-3(4?) replace commenters on websites like this one, and whether you will even be able to tell.
mdma is generally even more powerful for healing trauma.

Or rather MDMA can accelerate healing by released "stored unprocessed memories"

LSD can help you by showing you a possibility of whats possible by dissolving the prision of identity and seeing the world from a non-local perspective.
Immutability can be fast or slow depending on the implementation. There are tons of copy-on-write implementations that blaze past mutable implementations. When the compiler knows that a particular variable/piece of data will never be changed, it opens up a ton of optimizations that can be used to make it fast. With mutable memory it's on the developer to optimize, rather than the compiler. Most of the time, the latter is better at it.
All the headlines are based on news bulletin and data from International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems (IERS) service [0] on 2nd August 2022 [1]

[0] https://www.iers.org/IERS/EN/NewsMeetings/News/news.html

[1] https://datacenter.iers.org/data/latestVersion/207_BULLETIN_...
Regenerative breaking can already exist for trains without adding in the carbon capture [1].

Instead of adding batteries, and thus weight, the train supplies power back to the grid when it breaks. Thus, the cheaper source of energy described here can be achieved without the carbon capture, and consequently, we can use that power to power other things, reducing energy generation overall and reduce CO2 emissions.

Thus, it seems like the primary benefit here is using the train's motion to replace the fans required for carbon capture and thus piggybacking on the energy already expended by the train to move. That seems logical, though it could be deployed irrespective of regenerative breaking. Basically we should do regenerative breaking regardless as it is just more energy efficient. Regenerative breaking can primarily be deployed in electric trains anyway as you use the existing motors to break the train, and in so doing, generate electricity from those motors. Adding electric motors and a battery to diesel trains JUST for carbon capture seems foolish.

One question I had: how does this carbon capture change the aerodynamics of the train and thus its efficiency?

[1] https://www.ctc-n.org/technologies/regenerative-braking-trai....
What about your college degree on your resume? Don't you have to list the year you graduated? Even job portals that make everyone fill the damn web forms manually, it generally always asks when one graduated.

From that they can deduce your age?
Sweet! I've wanted a Singapore source.
There's an in-app web browser, and you can click "download" on most recipes from most websites and it will automatically parse the recipe (you can edit where needed) and save it to your recipes. It works perfectly without intervention from my part virtually all the time.

They also offer a bookmarklet (anyone remember those?), which I remember working well in Safari.
Showing some Teensy love, crazy the 4.0 has 600MHz base speed.
The purpose of affirmative action policies is to help under-represented groups. Asians aren't under-represented at Yale, they are 19 percent of the student population, while only 6 percent of the American population.
Self-oriented&socially prescribed perfectionism in severe alcohol use disorder
> OOP is a mess for control flow.

I used to think this until my new project where everything is functional, everything is reactive, everything is a lambda. Each function is very simple but the whole thing is impossible to trace.
I think there has been a lot of value in FE as a technological driver and from a PR perspective. VW/Audi/Porsche committed to it pretty early on, even after repeating forever that they weren't interested in Formula 1 (which of course changed this year...).

Motorsport is a great way to attract talent and drive innovation, but has always been super risky in terms of straight money in/money out. That's why they say, "You know how to make a small fortune in motorsport? Start out with a large one".
We read different history books.

In the 40s, the 6 people hired to program the ENIAC were all female. google "ENIAC girls". _Cosmopolitan_ ran articles about how programming was one of the few professional fields open to women. Managers thought that programming was basically just typing, so they hired women.

But then people started to realize it was more than just typing. So as the field started to get prestige in the mid 60s, companies started to look for things like college degrees and "personality tests", both of which were biased towards men.
How many layers can we do!!
I’m guessing elixir to JavaScript to v8 or whatever the js vm was called in chrome. Then jit then binary.

Communicating over a network or one of those chrome sockets to an elixir or erlang vm so someone else can manage your data.

Life is good
Capitalists = altruists

Corporatists = greedy

But why though?

Can you really ascribe character traits to these groups with a single brush?
Saying "Half the world doesn't have pavement" is like saying "Eat your broccoli, because some children halfway around the world are starving." It doesn't change the fact that we used to be able to do routine maintenance that covered this, and now we don't.
An HN user's unforgettable description of Google:

"At least when I was there, google seemed like an island with melancholic, but smart and kind pandas who never had to compete for food, for the food was brought to them by a ferry, and never had to do any work, unless they had a spark of curiosity that made them explore an interesting rock or mess with sand on the beach. All pandas were consistently exceeding expectations, even if they slept on a tree most of the day."

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25609594

Now, whenever I read "Google", my mind instantly sub "Island of melancholy pandas."
Can’t you just use the wood for something instead? I’ve seen a lot of innovative use for wood in large construction projects. For example, there was a recent proposal to replace the West Seattle bridge with a timber through arch bridge, and timber skyscrapers are apparently now a thing. This is especially true since concrete is a really polluting industry, and finding ways to use less cement is a pretty solid climate action.
This is a prime example of "marketing" - the title should inform the reader what they'll expect when they read it (even clickbait titles do this!) The "fun with" title doesn't inform anything except parts of the ingredients, which means unless you know what those things are, you're unlikely to read it.
Inertia is a thing, especially around mental models and ways of working. Its hard to change an early decision, because many other parts and people have subsequently made decisions ontop of that. Like the ship of theseus, replacing parts is possible, but the replacement needs to fit in the gap, and the inertia means even if you replace everything, its always a ship.
I was going to comment that both look very much like what you'd find in an advanced beginner's deviantart portfolio...like, late high school-ish age, I woudl guess.

The second is more 'advanced' to me than the first, possessing an actual style, but neither is anything I would consider high quality enough to serve as a project/company/site/personal logo.
Someone call Brahm
Yes, this https://www.zdnet.com/article/hacker-ransoms-23k-mongodb-dat... has nothing to do with jepsen report pointing out durability issues within db engine itself which mongo was known for
> 'What's being proposed is that we ... read everyone's messages. I don't think people want that'

Just as people need a frequent reminder that "in the Cloud" really means "on someone else's computers", I think we also need to be reminded that "by AI" can just mean "by people, with extra steps".
Having been forced to work with an obsolete version of Airflow at work, I can attest to how narrow-minded the project's focus was when it was originally created. The scheduling quirks and UTC defaults are enough to paint the picture here.

Not completely sure if most of the issues I've faced were resolved in the future releases, but I don't fully agree with the take of the article. Like go with the scheduler that works for your current and potential future needs. The reason why we continue to use Airflow despite the issues is because it works so well with our workflows. This does mean that I would recommend it to another team.
ISO-8601 for thew win. Accept no substitutes.

But yes, "act with empathy and gentle guidance" is The Way.

Also, never name you previous versions foo.new and foo.old or you will end up with foo.old.old.no-really-old, and foo.new2
"The Big Short" did it pretty well.
Yesterday was my last day of working at Google
Considering Texas is usually one of the culprits leading the charge on repressive laws that steer the country further in that direction, and reliably elects far-right conservatives to statewide positions, I think it's fair to label Texas a very conservative state on the whole.
"What is Celody? Celody is a network state powered by a new form of music. By listening to infinite music streams, you generate tokens that are used inside a musical universe of digital people. In short, Celody is a world born from music."

These words don't mean anything. There may be an interesting project in here, but it's impossible to say for sure. If the creators are reading, you really need to figure out what's interesting about this to your target audience.
That doesn't ever have to be done.

Generics are a language level feature, so it must be done at the
language/compiler level, otherwise people are forced to implement it using "go
generate" or other metaprogramming. The standard library doesn't ever have to
change in that regard. If people want a generic version of some function, they
can just write it themself. Its possible/likely that more generic functions
will be added to standard library, but its not a foregone conclusion that it
needs to happen, or even should happen.
It's not quite the same as a while loop, because when you return from the loop() function, how long it takes before it gets called again isn't defined. Using arduino-pico, for example, it does some USB I/O handling (when using TinyUSB). If you write an actual while loop and don't return from the loop function often enough, you might starve the USB port implementation.

This adds enough of a delay that I moved some code to the other core on the Pico to get precise timing.
They will become more expensive. I have no idea how much, but my initial guess is too much. At least for those already struggling. The rich might manage it, but for poor it might be too much to ask for.
I see an opening for a very good set of tutorials on how to avoid all the pitfalls.

[edit] - Actually... they have some good points, I just worry about someone thinking they can just "sprinkle threading" into their code, and failing to understand that in doing so they change the laws of physics of the code.
You need a good foundation in quantum field theory to be able to read Elvang and Huang effectively. 'Peskin and Schroeder' and Srednicki are good standard introductions to QFT. If you understood around half of either of those text books then I think you would be in a good position.

QFT itself has many prerequisites; you need to be well versed in special relativity, electromagnetism, classical field theory and quantum mechanics to get a hold on it. Each of these areas have their own mathematical prerequisites, which include algebra and calculus, multivariable calculus, pdes, complex analysis and fourier analysis.

General relativity and string theory are also comparative to QFT in scope, prerequisite knowledge and utility in other areas of mathematical physics. You would need to learn these if you wanted to start reading a bit more broadly in scattering amplitudes or in another part of math phys, but you can go quite a long way in scattering amplitudes without too much of them.
I have had good trips and bad trips on a variety of highly psychedelic substances, and I've had a lot of those trips. Trying to engineer the trip out of the drug to get a desired psychoactive result free from pesky side effects like not being as grounded to reality for a while is absolutely missing the forest for the trees. Not to say that it can't produce some benefit but it's leaving a lot of unexplored potential on the table, largely in deference to failed puritanical ideals about recreational drug use.
My belief is that the “trip” is us being able to observe more about our brains than we typically access. My personal experience indicates to me that the “trip” is removing filtering processes the brain uses to remove noise and irrelevant information to the task at hand. When in a “trip” then, it’s more like we are seeing what our brain sees—the things that appear auditorilly and visually are due to neural circuits overfitting and subsequently not being able to filter the misreads and “extra data”.

I’ve always thought of it like a self-diagnostic mode/tool where we get exposed to debug data that our brain normally would filter out.