skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
And, when they are mothballed early, unable to compete even on OPEx alone, even neglecting CAPEX, the cost of every kWh ever delivered will skyrocket as the CAPEX then has to be amortized over the total finally produced.
The literal raids to prevent the media from reporting on Ozzie Special Forces committing gruesome murders in Afghanistan come to mind.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-51526607
Librarian's Letter to Google Security
Same question? Anybody know advertising RPM that newsletters could generate?
There aren't breaking changes.
Don't understand what's so great about it. Pretty much every amd64 laptop works great with Linux. I've had Lenovos, Dells, Huaweis, HPs, etc.

Not to mention laptops designed specifically to target Linux like the Framework laptop.
Been using Docusaurus for quite a while to spin up little documentation sites to share with people. Had somewhat given up hope on version 2 as so many features had piled up and it looked like it had become unmanageable. Good effort for getting through it all.

I would say though that part of what appealed to me does seem to be getting lost - the simplicity. I know you don't have to use all the features and v1 is still around, but it is becoming a bit of a buzzword beast.
The cost of diabetes
https://www.npmjs.com/package/docusaurus-pdf looks useful. Unclear which version this supports, however. (Not a user of docusaurous, YMMV).
Storage is trivial.

It will be built after there is enough renewable generating capacity to charge it from.
> 1) How do lockdowns to minimise deaths violate natural justice?

To minimise _one form_ of death. If you locked everybody in their houses forever, nobody would die of car accidents, but more people would die of other things. All the studies now show that lockdowns achieved no reduction in overall mortality, they just delayed things a bit, and led to a bunch of other issues like increase in alcoholism/depression and significantly impaired childhood development.
Also running OneDev. Looks pretty, is fast, not having to setup Drone is a big plus. Loving it.
Almost $1 billion per day in the United States.
I'm actually using it for both docs and marketing pages. It's so nice to be able to easily link between pages as it's all the one site. And I'm not even a JavaScript developer. Thanks for your hard work!

Also, I'd love to see a theme marketplace. I'm also not a designer and would pay for pro designs (especially landing pages). Check out mui, that's what they do (open source but with marketplace).
They're truly tricorders. They can 3d scan the world, they can broadcast live to the entire world, they can connect you with a doctor and help diagnose your illness, on and on.
If you don't give it a go you're always wonder "What if?".

But keep your day job for now.

I always recommend @DHH's startup school talk:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CDXJ6bMkMY

You need to balance family, day job and your SaaS/Hustle then you won't have any regrets.

I would recommend keeping your day job as long as possible while still making progress on your SaaS/Hustle.

Having income should make building your SaaS/Hustle easier up till the point where it replaces your day job income.

SaaS/Hustles can be slow to grow revenue.
https://businessofsoftware.org/talk/how-to-negotiate-the-lon...

It's hard balancing both but the nice thing is if you love your hustle it won't feel like work.

Checkout Microconf videos and StartupsForTheRestOfUs podcast.

Rob Walling has lots of advice on how to transition to full time on your side project this.

Oh, one more thing. If you want it to replace your day job, don't think of it as your hustle. Aim high. Don't think you're going to get funded but don't aim for $100k AAR think about how it could be $1M or $10M or even $100M AAR. It probably has a higher ceiling than you expect.

Good luck my friend. Follow your dreams (responsibly).
Nvidia is actively hostile. Apple is slightly willing to get Linux to work. It's not comperable.
The market is free to make their decisions. With a global ban on fossil fuels in the European grid countries should choose for themselves if they want to build multiple cheaper renewables or build more expensive nuclear. Voters will then say theirs. Countries can always trade with each other so that which ever strategy end up as a winner will spread to the others.

Everything is a win-win scenario as long fossil fuels stays in the ground.
Well, I have 7 subscribers of my newsletter. I don’t really push it I just have a signup form at the bottom of posts and occasionally in the middle of longer/popular posts.

I don’t really know if newsletters work.
Your example click rate is about an order of magnitude higher than the average.
This is a specious argument. Supporting undocumented hardware is fine and always has been - what’s not is supporting gross non-free kernel blobs.
> Horseshit. A few nurses were stood down because they wouldn't get a vaccination in a pandemic. Good.

A pandemic in which they were at the frontlines, observing both the effects of covid on patients and the effects of the vaccines, yet they were more afraid of the vaccines than covid. That should tell you something about how safe the vaccines are.
I've been driving a Prius in one model or another since 2004. It's just a car and has no discernible opinions other than the mileage readout telling me that I'm hitting the gas pedal too much.
More trustworthy thank Adobe...

Not hard
Yeah I'm going to use a completely custom SoC + enthusiast driven driver support - with no support from manufacturer - to be my daily driver as a developer.

Because I've got nothing better to do with my time than diagnose issues due to running a setup only 50 other people in the world use.
You only build storage after you have renewable generating capacity to charge it from. By the time it is needed, its cost will have fallen to a trivial amount.
This post is pretty well written but having so many words and phrases in bold text made it annoying for me to read.
200 years at today's consumption rate.

To power the world with nuclear would require many more reactors. Current world average primary energy consumption is 18 TW, which is 6000 3 GWth reactors. That's an order of magnitude more than currently are in operation. Add in demand growth from industrializing countries and the uranium would last maybe a decade.

Uranium availability is not an immediate problem if you assume nuclear remains a sideshow on the global energy stage. That's to assume nuclear is neither needed nor particularly useful for addressing global warming. Is that what you're assuming?
”Uh-oh”
> When someone buys a car because it's miserable trying to get 2+ kids to school on public transit

That is dumb, in the US, school buses exist even in the suburbs. You most likely already fun them with taxpayer money for public school. I have even taken school buses for private school.
Also just like the UK, one could say.
Being ISO doesn't mean it's not "US-like". The UK layout, for example, does differ considerably between Macs and IBM, with the UK Mac layout being closer to a US layout than a UK IBM layout (examples posted here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32304113). I couldn't give a crap if the UK Mac layout is an ISO standard or not because that doesn't magically change the way I use a keyboard.

Furthermore I made the exact same point about redefining the layout. You claim to debunk my post yet go on to make literally the same points I did. In literally the same bullet point you're trying to debunk too!

(I'd forgotten why I usually avoid commenting on Apple-based threads. Ever word is analysed and if it can be interpreted in even a remotely disparaging way by either your Apple or Linux fanboys, then they'll stop reading the entirety of your comment and pull that one phrase out with some terse rebuttal phrased as if the original poster was an idiot. Completely irrelevant of whether that rebuttal is actually just reiterating the OPs comment or even if the original comment, when read in full, was actually negative at all.
I'm so happy with Material Mkdocs[1]. I use Obsidian to write a bunch of notes and then combine that with a bunch of mkdocs plugins to generate a static site out of it [2].

What does Docusaurus offer more, if anyone who's used both can compare?

[1]: https://squidfunk.github.io/mkdocs-material/

[2]: https://github.com/mr-karan/notes
>I am sure they work because Substack's whole business model relies on it.

Is Substack profitable? Because it's easy to meddle hype/popularity with having a business model that makes sense. So I'm questioning how sure one can be about it just yet.
> For the dystopian cyberpunk future where a few companies rule the world, yup.

oauth with google isn't the only option. There are oodles of oauth providers out there, and you can even set up your own.

> Biometric traits are a big nono for me.

Nobody is talking about biometrics but you.

> And another device just shifts the password problem to said device

Passwordless doesn't mean 2fa, and even if you _are_ talking about another device, the other device doesn't have to require a password.

> (same for email account instead of device).

They're not the same actually, not at all. Firstly passwordless doesn't imply access to another _device_, (and even in the case of WebAuthn it doesn't even imply access to another service). The most common case of Oauth allows for the service provider to trust any number of providers, who may or may not require a password. It can be a hardware key, it can be a private key in software that a restricted process has access to, or yes it can be a password.

> Once someone has access to the device (secured via one password) they have access to everything.

If someone has access to your device and password, it doesn't matter if you use unique passwords for everything, pretty much every service in existence will happily let you reset your password with access to the original email account.

> So a normal trade in convenience for security.

Hard disagree here. My biggest risk vector is third party websites insecurely handling credentials and leaking them. If they require passwords, my password gets leaked, which means I need unique passwords per site, which in turn means I'm going to rely on software to manage those credentials for me. If I'm relying on software to manage those credentials for me, isn't it _more secure_ to reduce the possibility of human error, clipboard scraping, incorrect file permissions on my local uncencrypted file of passwords (because if it's encrypted I need a password for this too, right?)
Me too! We had RPG lessons in school.
i really think the blockchain part should be part of the title on HN, it's kind of the USP
Not workable.

Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe and is found in great abundance in all galaxies. It is particularly present in the Sun, which is problematic because it is not very accessible to us :) On Earth, there is also a lot of hydrogen in water and in hydrocarbons. However, it does not exist in free form, i.e. just hydrogen. It is always associated with something else, for example with oxygen in water, or with carbon in hydrocarbons.

There are, however, small sources of native hydrogen in the earth underground, but the quantities are nowhere near what we would need to use if we wanted to do anything significant with it. At least not beyond what we are already doing, because hydrogen is already used a lot these days. Nearly 100 million metric tonnes of this element are produced in the world every year.

To be transported, hydrogen must be kept under high pressure or extremely low temperature. This should already raises some question about the feasibility :)

Half of this production is used to de-sulphurize fuels and the other half to make fertilizers (Haber-Bosch process). Thus, hydrogen is already used extensively in the world, but there is a small problem: it is made from hydrocarbons, fossil natural gas, oil or coal, which represents 10 to 30 (metric) tonnes of CO2 per metric ton of hydrogen.

With the way it is made, should we go even further towards this fuel despite global warming? We could then imagine making hydrogen for other applications that do not exist today. For example, like you imagine, to power vehicles with hydrogen fuel cells or to make steel without emitting CO2.

There is a process for making iron with blast furnaces that do not emit CO2. There are also plans by steelmakers to make steel without emitting CO2 by converting iron ore into iron with hydrogen. The hydrogen then removes the oxygen from the iron ore, which is released into the atmosphere as water vapor. To do this, large quantities of hydrogen are needed and, for example, to replace a blast furnace, a nuclear plant is needed to generate the electricity that will enable the water to be electrolyzed, which is the only way to make "clean" hydrogen without emitting CO2. Something like a thousand wind turbines would be needed to replace a nuclear plant (and remember: wind turbines does not work all the time)

When you see the amount of electricity it would take to be able to produce carbon-free hydrogen in large quantities, you realize that there will never be much of it in transport. Not all the world's aircraft will be replaced by hydrogen-powered aircraft, for example. The applications that could then be made with carbon-free hydrogen would be to keep the production of fertilizers and carbon-free steel. Achieving this would already be a big step.
Yeah, it happens in Japan. Even more dangerous are new religious groups - like the Unification Church you'd probably heard about due to Abe's asassination.
looks exactly like U+29A2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miscellaneous_Mathematical_Sym... Turned angle to me
Awesome. Always good to have more open source products.
Will you make it easier to make forms look like Typeform?
Nukes have never been competitive. Every last nuke ever built depended utterly on subsidy coerced from taxpayers or ratepayers.
Not all overbuilding is the same.

This link [1] shows that solar energy generation is 6 times higher in the summer than in the winter in Germany.

The total electricity consumption varies is about 1.5 times higher in the winter than in the summer [2].

In other words, you need to overbuild nuclear by a factor of 1.5, and solar by a factor of 9.

[1] https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/monthly-gener...

[2] https://app.electricitymaps.com/zone/DE
Love Muse and can't wait for the album. I appreciate that they have always been trying new things with their music. The anti-establishment ideals of early bitcoin users were pretty inline with the kind of things Matt sings about. Really a shame where crypto landed though.
Upper Colorado River leaders push back against federal ask for conservation
This is one of the main benefits of meditation IMO. It's more about giving yourself the time and space to think through things to your own minds satisfaction. Giving your mind the space it needs to process things.
They'll just block the free users on their own service for violating the terms.
Phone yes. iPad that you are not holding in-hand the entire time so it directly faces you, not so much.
This has been the definition everywhere for a while, UK and elsewhere. The fact that you are changing it now IS the most political you could ever make it. I am baffled that you could make this argument, YOU are us centric political saying this.
I feel like I've heard the same thing in quite a lot of places now, talking in general terms but never having the balls to name names. Off the top of my head I've heard references to it from the guys at All-In, I've definitely heard the people at Odd-lots make reference to it as well, and I'm sure I've heard it elsewhere.

Obviously people are very wary about making public accusations about other investors/VCs, especially ones that have the resources to sue them, but I've got to think: They're all saying Chris Dixon at a16z is running this scam right? I feel like that's got to be what they're hinting at unless there's some other big VCs in the crypto space? No one wants to say the name, for obvious reasons, but there's really not many people they can be talking about.

I wonder if anyone has seen a more direct description of what's going on over there.
If some of those 50 are kernel devs Linux is likely to run just fine.
>Please provide a link to a pumped storage that buy green wind power when the price is low and sell it when the price is high.

Not sure what you mean here. Like, a link to fengning? Kaprun? Snowy 2?

Also you dont buy "green power" on the grid. You just buy power.

We dont have much pumped storage right now coz (at least until feb) basically nothing could compete with gas as a peaker. Some is under construction though in anticipation of it being economic in a few years. With the subsidies nuclear eats for breakfast we could accelerate and bring online even more stable power than nuclear possibly could at lower cost.

>Wind doesn't have day and night cycles like that, but rather have periods lasting weeks or months of either good wind or poor wind.

It tends to anticorrelate with solar production which has a smoothing effect. Also the idea that whole months go by with little to no wind is a myth. Offshore in particular is a lot more stable than its reputation, topping out at 67% capacity factor, which is only slightly below France's 71% for its nuclear plants in 2020 (frances plants are getting decrepit).

Pro nuclear articles almost invariably avoid delving into this and comparing the economics and focus almost exclusively on safety because this isnt an argument it can really win.

>Since nuclear is presented as being the most expensive method to create energy, if you then store it in pumped hydro and add this additional storage cost, how in the world would that be economical viable?

Coz France subsidized the shit out of its nuclear industry in the 70s in reaction to the oil crisis. You can make anything economic if you throw subsidies at it. Whether those subsidies were well spent is another matter.

If you assume construction is a sunk cost, existing nuclear plants are economically competitive which is partly why new US nuclear legislation is focused on extending plant life. However, running decrepit old nuclear plants until the bitter end isnt particularly safe.

Hence why it's important to prime the public to think that it is with all those "nuclear power is the future!" articles. Consent must be manufactured.
I downvoted you because this is HN, not reddit. It's absolutely not true, and doubly so in the situation where you're dealing with b2b agreements. Most service agreements for enterprise agreements are negotiable, and certainly don't contain the above clauses.
Yes, we started diverging at “fork” - the other me is different than current me, but we are both the old me. And the legal stuff is indeed down to law, although I believe even from that point of view both “yous” are still you, because there is no way to tell you apart. That’s also why there is no “original” and the copy - of there was a way to tell which is which, you wouldn’t be identical. And there is no delusion - the other me is the “old me” same way I am.

I think the essential problem with this point of view is similar to many words theory - to most people the idea of “cheap fork” sounds quite alien; I’m not sure if there’s anything similar in our usual reality. It is however common in the internets, from Unix to Git.
Honestly. That’s what I’ve been doing my entire professional career.

Modern laptops are not materially different from SoCs, everything is soldered to the board and the CPU does basically everything memory related.

I guess you think that Intel designs are an open standard?

At the very least they’re extremely patent incumbered; with AMD and Intel having a sort of patent truce between them.
You get similar workflows via interfaces, delegation and now generics to help reduce the boilerplate.

COM has done just great during the last 30 years without class inheritance.
Upfront Ventures Raises Millions for Startups and Returns Millions to LPs
The Disastrous Record of Celebrity Crypto Endorsements
You need hydrogen to synthesize ammonia.
But it's still discouraging to the companies that actually support Linux.
This is a quite interesting discussion actually! Some thoughts:

First of all: Theoretical results are actually quite important for real-life performance. It’s possible to write an implementation of bubble sort, have a bunch of benchmarks which shows great performance and 100% test coverage. Yet there are cases where you’ll hit the n^2. The theoretical proof (especially the worst case) are quite important to not get bitten by this. You can search for “accidental quadratic” for plenty of cases where this happens in practice: people have implemented algorithms which works well in practice for small n, but fails (unnecessary) for larger n. A theoretical analysis would have caught this (although probably not worth the engineering effort).

Secondly: “proving” isn’t exclusive to theoretical analysis. I’d argue you can “prove” that a method call in Ruby is slower than a function call in C. You can look at the machine code which gets executed and see that there’s no way for a CPU (regardless of cache, pipelining etc) to execute the Ruby variant faster. There will of course be plenty of assumptions (as there is in theoretical proofs as well!), but in my option it’s a proof nonetheless.

However, to claim that “Kermem is provably 10x faster than FlatBuffers”, I’d say that you need more than a few benchmarks. You’d have to argue that every operational is (at worst) 10x faster.
Intel and AMD have developers working on Linux support and drivers and support running Linux on their hardware.
I read newsletters fairly regularly and I go search for them too sometimes.

While I appreciate using RSS to get a taste of the spectrum of current events, newsletters tend to be more curated, sometimes carrying a theme, and have the feeling of quality.

I used to flip through the weekly ads in newspapers but oh boy there was nothing quite like getting a company’s sales catalog. The feeling is similar for me.
> Godot is MIT-licensed so no, they can't arbitrarily revoke your license and force you to stop developing your game.

Sure they can, but it's meaningless unless they try to enforce it via court, in exactly the same way Our Machinery's license will be enforced.
Never put AWS temporary credentials in the credentials file (or env vars) (2021)
If it was under Trump it would be a wonderful recession. Beautiful. The best recession America has ever had, in fact it would recede in ways nobody has ever even imagined.
Most laptops don't use a completely custom SoC, but most of them have enthusiast driven driver support -- or worse, formerly-enthusiast driven driver support where nobody currently cares -- with no support from the manufacturer. And on less popular hardware; the most popular laptop models in the world are macs.

If you want manufacturer support, you need to use macOS or Windows or one of the very limited selection of laptops which feature Linux as an option. Most people who use Linux probably already use Linux on a computer without manufacturer support. If that's not for you though, that's totally fine.
It's not the law that prevents the people in a Prisoners Dilemma situation from freely choosing the best outcome for themselves. It's the lack of enforcement of rules which incentives defection.

In this case:

good guy installs insulation

bad guy doesn't

good guy publishes info on future savings

bad guy publishes fake info

good guy publishes trusted reviews

bad guy publishes fake reviews.

and so on.

The good guys want the legislation, not to force then to do the thing they wanted to do anyway, they want it to stop bad guys putting them out of business via scamming customers.