skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In what way is this not "Due process" ?

The presumption of innocence does not mean you're entitled to obstruct investigators. "But you haven't proved that I'm guilty" also doesn't work to stop detectives entering your home with a search warrant.
that tracks with our experience as well
When you pay people very little you get

1. The selfless (or the insane or crazy activists)
2. The rich
3. The corrupt

When you pay people a lot you also get

4. Competent hard working people who aren't necessarily selfless. (this is most people)

This group of people makes up the vast majority of people in the US, so why not have some of those people represent us.
I still keep it blocked for his reason:
https://socfortress.medium.com/data-exfiltration-using-icmp-...
Contracts require monthly phone service, and all the other fees they tack on along with those charges.
Where’s the name from?
Their allocation is no more than. Not a minimum.

He stated here that he wouldn't put in more money than he's comfortable in losing 80% in: https://www.bridgewater.com/research-and-insights/our-though...
You really got me there!

But clipping isn't the same as acronyms, mainly because a clipped word is (generally) easily searchable whereas acronyms are shared across several domains and will sometimes overlap inside a single domain, which is the source of the frustration for me.
Ah gotcha yeah i wasn’t sure if it was Carlin or Burr!
"Mother sauces" is not gatekeeping lol, its an industry term. It's no more gatekeeping than "data structure."

I don't understand at all, honestly - I see a term I don't know, I grab the googs and figure it out. My first reaction isn't to accuse the person who knows something I don't of gatekeeping.
> You will never be able to do so

Could the constitution not be amended, at least in theory? Or the supreme court create a new interpretation?
They got pissed about a multi-million dollar investment because a founder spent (financed?) $100k on a car?
Glad to see someone else recognizing this issue as someone from a lower middle class background.

In a previous life I worked in the Policy world - Democratic state level politics in California and the Midwest and a small stint on the Hill. The wages provided were ATROCIOUS. On the Hill, as a staffer you were lucky to earn $50-60k a year working a job that almost always required some amount of graduate education AND a number of unpaid or near unpaid internships - that too in a city where rents and cost of living are roughly comparable to Seattle, Austin, or the Bay. Unsurprisingly, most people who stuck it out were inevitably from upper middle class or upper class backgrounds (the kinds who went to Harker type high schools), and the rest of us filtered out into higher paying roles in the business or tech world. This is a problem in BOTH parties btw - a number of my GOP staffer friends saw similar patterns in their own offices.

This failure to recognize class issues across both aisles is tragic. At least it looks like there is some hope now that the offices of a number of freshman House Reps on both sides of the aisle have been agitating for and starting to receive both union benefits and wage increases, but this is still a piecemeal solution to the larger economic disparities that continue to exist in American discourse.
>I swear the acronym BOGO appeared ex nihilo three years ago.

No, that just happened a moment ago. :)

I am familiar with the concept; just not familiar with it as an acronym.
I wish more were! That's what I was hoping parsnip.ai was. I was really excited actually.
It does exist. Unfortunately it's not open source.

https://mace.software/
Yes, COPPA and the implementing regs require parental notice and affirmative consent: see 16 CFR Part 312, particularly §§ 312.4, 312.5

https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-16/chapter-I/subchapter-C...
If all this effort is expended only to look at a single object, the whole idea seems kind of pointless.

However, we are using the mental model of a camera lens to reach that conclusion, and I'm not certain it applies:

1) even if we use the mental model of a camera lens, given the distances involved, you can probably consider most of the interesting the targets to be "at infinity"

2) I'm not certain that a gravitational lens works like a camera lens.
That's also the impetus that led to flow/relay "architecture" that led to redux in the first place. Possibly a reason such tools will continue to be reinvented every so often in React. React is a flat circle.
This has been known for a long while.

I'm not sure the purpose - probably just for fun, but as an attack vector without 0day in pdf for example, to me at least it wouldn't be too effective.

I've always been fascinated thought and been playing around with images with executable inside that could be triggered through the browser that you're on, I have played with a personal chromium build that it 'kind of' happens, but i digress.

Interesting article - I just don't see a patch coming for it anytime soon.
Your "now what?" question is legitimate and reminiscent of reactions after the completion of the Human Genome Project.

Just like having a human genome sequence, this is not a magic key that solves all problems of biology but a building block for use by researchers. An investigator may look up the folded structure of a protein and use that information to glean certain context-specific insights from it such as how exactly two interacting proteins interact mechanically.

The other significant benefit is that this frees up resources that were spent having to figure out the structure in other ways. It's an efficiency improvement.
I’ll clarify - there is no mass consumer field for VR that will enable adoption or a market in the size of home consoles, laptops or televisions.

VR in its currently incarnation will not make a system that will sell 100 million units, which is the regular size market of the leading home console in a generation (both switch and PS4 sold this much).

I’m surprised they sold as much as they did tbh.
I'm not sure I'd say those documents suggest "a pretty complete understanding" by any means, and on their own would hardly constitute convincing proof of the need to start reducing emissions. But we definitely did have that by the 80s, and 40 years later we're still not taking it seriously.
Because the free VC money party is over and Uber was never really a business.
TL;DR ive been consolidating my cooking knowledge in an open source recipe site https://github.com/cookwherever/cookwherever

Hey! I am excited to see people developing in this space since this is where my head is also at. Up until two years ago I was eating canned chili and soylent before I was shown the light with The Food Lab and Salt, Fat, Acid and Heat. Ever since I have been trying to share my knowledge on cooking with others with varying levels of success.

What has become clear to me is that there is no one size fits all approach to teaching cooking since it is usually a very cultural experience for most people (as many in the comments have pointed out). That said, SFAH makes the argument that most cuisines are much closer than people think when you consider the functional properties of the ingredients that you are cooking. Pizza is just pasta with yeast *Italian grandmothers slowly turn their heads towards this atrocity*

All of this to say, I believe recipes are critical to jump start the creative process of cooking. When any type of possible failure on the path to completion is experienced (ex. missing ingredient, burnt cookies, etc.) there MUST be some way of recovering or at the very least understanding how that happened.

I have been slowing taking notes on all the cooking knowledge I have come across and have been putting it along side the recipes that inspire me. Forcing learning on someone in the kitchen, who is already probably pretty hungry if cooking is seen as a chore, is not productive. Sharing the joy you get from the art that is cooking is IMPERATIVE for any type of educational resource.

If you are interested in my progress, or want to contribute go check it out! https://github.com/cookwherever/cookwherever
CDOs were not fraud. They were legal. They were just extremely stupid and unethical, like some (but not all) crypto.
That `sys::TransactionIsolation` doc is outdated, EdgeDB only supports the `Serializable` transaction isolation. See related discussion [1]

At this point EdgeDB supports Postgres HA passively, i.e. it will react to a failover event in your cluster via one of the documented mechanisms. Support for "active" cluster management is a planned feature too.

Finally, EdgeDB server itself is fully stateless and you can run multiple instances of it in front of the same Postgres cluster. Admittedly, we need to document this better.

[1] https://github.com/edgedb/edgedb/discussions/3466
> Firefox has added support for some webdriver APIs[1] that this proprietary "WebContainers" product depends on

Hi, WebContainers does not depend on WebDriver BiDi. We did mention our interest in this new standard getting more momentum in other blog post (which might be the source of your statement?).
They’re probably wrong.
Voter ID laws are a hard sell in the US because of the extent to which they have been used for voter suppression. There is a recent North Carolina (??) example where the court striking down the law were about 1 inch from using the word "racist" in the ruling.
What's BOPIS?
Web apps run in the browser sandbox. They don't generally have access to the filesystem.
Sorry, I'm not sure where you're picking up "outrage" from my comment. You were asserting "It would be really expensive and low-yield to pull over everyone in the vicinity of a gunshot" and I was asking 'for whom?' I don't see how incentives are aligned for that to be expensive at all for the person doing the pulling over, and I tend to evaluate people's behavior on the assumption that, all other things being equal, they'll do what they're most incentivized to in a given situation most of the time.

It's expensive for the community, to be sure, but the cop's not incentivized immediately to care about that.
Do you think it's unlikely that people share the same opinions as their family/friends/colleagues?

Or do you think it's very likely that most federal politicians are extremely corrupt and not getting caught?
Amazon jumps on revenue beat and rosy guidance for third quarter
I guess like all libertarians you will be surprised to learn that there is a separate body of jurisprudence around public property, separate from private property law.
I am an Apple fan because I have been a fan for 20 years. However, Apple has been objectively a "boring" company the last 10 years. They are famous for design but they don't push design forward anymore because they don't have a crazy, arrogant person at the top to rally the troops in a unique direction.

The only area they're not conservative in is chip design, but that's not a cool and trendy thing. You don't hear regular people talk about the chips in their iPhones. How is Apple able to stay relevant among younger people and convince them to buy iPhones when Android phones are just as capable and look just as good?
Doesn't AWS IoT run only in us-east-1?

And I think Alexa skills, if anybody cares about those.
Hold up. This is explanation is completely wrong.

> set up a shell "company" with no assets,

CDO's were assets. They were collections of mortgages. When you bought CDOs, you were buying real slices of mortgages (at various levels of abstraction).

The fraud existed because there were quantifiable differences between the value of the underlying asset and the value of the securities being offered.

So I guess in that regard, the same sort of fraud is theoretically impossible for crypto because a) none of the assets have a quantifiable value anyway and b) it's okay to throw away investor's money if you properly disclose it as a risk?
Hello, some developers may have received an email yesterday noting that their banking information in iTunes Connect is invalid and needs to be corrected. This email was sent in error and we apologize. No action needs to be taken at this time.

source: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/711039
It might be that you are reading this thing as a way to GAIN influence. This is a measurement of how much influence you HAVE.
Yes seriously, it’s usually the wood that will split/break before the glue
Yes, they will tell you what the number is if you ask them. They will send you copies of all the reported income they know about which is all you have to pay on.
a lot of people use Apple Card to finance (because of cash back) and apple card is underwritten by Barclays or GS bank if I remember correctly
Leader or ruler denotes hierarchy and rules (laws) that must be enforced, my understanding of the word anarchy refers to no hierarchy and no coercion and no government.

How do you enforce a code of conduct without threat of violence? What is the difference between a ruler and a leader who gives the orders to forcefully enact a law?

You may stick to a code of conduct because you believe it to be right, others may not, what stops others from doing whatever they like to you? You can defend yourself (through violence) but you cannot do that against a larger better equipped group, instead you must be in your own group that is organized by a set rules that you must follow, and if you don't then there must be consequences.

There is no such thing as a stable anarchy, it's simply law of the jungle.
I've been hearing that since the first Xbox came out (which used an x86 architecture before the Xbox 360 moved to powerpc) and it still hasn't happened.
Green bubbles vs blue bubbles
Because I’ve already walked the path you laid out 20 years ago. I’ve read the letters of the Founders too. That you insist it be used as a basis is a bias I can build things without.

Paraphrasing Jefferson, we should bin the Constitution every 19 years. But Madison felt the future owed the past, so we teach our kids to abide a dead man’s idea of a proper political framework. Paraphrasing Jefferson again; the dead do not rule the living. Paraphrasing Hume then; commit the Constitution to the flames.

From my reference frame you need me to import a specific philosophy when understanding of physical laws are all that’s needed to build.

I’m not being qualitative; there is no theory of science, no quantity of evidence the Constitution is responsible for engineering anything. Plenty of evidence people built together before it existed. From my reference frame you’re demanding more work than necessary to solve human problems.

You’re qualifying my behavior as negative because you’re not getting what you want, but the Constitution does not include a provision to provide you that. shrug
you could put a cron entry by dumping a file into /etc/cron.d/

run any command as any user once a minute
Postgres does have a very elaborate extension system, but it's unsuitable for something like EdgeDB, because we are fundamentally altering the database interface: EdgeQL vs SQL and a different client/server protocol.
A more misleading title could not have been devised. Edit: typo.
But they cant use automated means. That’s what allows them to blast out texts.

Generally, there are two subcategories of TCPA claims: DNC (227(c)) and ATDS/prerecorded voice (227(b)). The latter claims are still available against politicians, last I checked. The latter claims regulate the technology that allows blast calls and messaging with pre-recorded messages.

not legal advice
When you've reached all the people that are going to buy iPhones, "services" is where you still have growth. Cloud storage, music, video streaming...

To be sure it is not the hardware company of the 20th Century any longer.
In my (admittedly biased) view, microsoft sacrificed security in the name of "usability". The problem is with what they considered "usability". It looks like in their view, "easy of use" simply meant "keep it working the way users are used to do". This created many bad habits in windows users: always clicking next, installing software from untrusted sources, hiding extensions of files, need for the user to install drivers after pluging a device, use of administrator rights even for simple tasks, rebooting the computer to make something work, periodic reinstalling the OS to make it faster.... and many other behaviors that are very very strange for people who don't use windows.

The other problem it created is that windows users expect things to be like that. Even if something is better they will have difficulty using it if it is different from how windows users are used to. Certainly this helps to keep windows market while making everybody pay a hefty price.

I'd bet if it wasn't because of android, ios and smart tv's; because they are different enough from what users think a "computer" is; windows users would expect a port to connect some form of media for software installation on these devices.

These habits afflict even power users, developers and administrators. Just consider how long windows lived without a reasonable powerful command line. I was more than once looked down from "windows experts" because for them, using a command line like is commonly done on linux is a "thing of the past".

People should learn some windows behaviors are not normal. Your computer shouldn't get slower over time, installing software from untrusted sources is not normal, an extension is part of the name of a file and it should not be hidden, using the computer as administrator should be reserved for administrator tasks only, your desktop area is not /tmp/, drivers belong to the kernel and devices should work as soon as they are plugged in, the command line is not a thing of the past...

We are all paying the price for not killing these myths.
if all you are running are a few ec2 servers then you have quite a lot of competitors to choose from and price out/balance with reliability.

we use aws at work, but been running side projects on digital ocean for years for way less than hundreds a month
> How are they able to convert newer people to buy iPhones when Android phones are just as capable and look just as good?

There's an embedded statement in this that might be incorrect and would give you the answer to your question.
"Corporate censorship" is "fine" because preventing corporations from moderating content is inconsistent with the 1st amendment.

I do not agree that those 2 articles support your point.

"“We’re flagging problematic posts for Facebook that spread disinformation,” she [Psaki] said." It's still up to Facebook to determine wether or not to take down a post. There is a BIG difference between a government official reporting a post to Facebook and the government passing a law preventing a citizen from posting in the first place (which would obviously violate the 1st amendment).

The second article describes people who used to work in government now working for Social Media companies. It is, in my opinion, a stretch to call that government censorship. "The problem is that having so many former CIA employees running the world’s most important information and news platform is only one small step removed from the agency itself deciding what you see and what we do not see online –" Disagree. It is a BIG step to leap from "former government employees, including members of the CIA, work in trust, security and moderation" to "the CIA is controlling what is on social media."
> Those blog posts are a good start. I was referencing the full pricing page for s3 that breaks down by region and class.

This is not a good look.

From your blog post:

> It's hard to come to a firm conclusion since pricing data is held very secretly (AWS quickly deletes announcements of historical price decreases).

There’s nothing wrong with “I missed that. Thanks, let me update the blog”.
x86matthew
This has nothing to do with compounding interest.

It happens because the less wealthy player has a lot more to loose then gain in an unequal economy. That is even if a trade outcome is favorable to the less wealthy player, it is unlikely that the outcome is significant enough to change the balance. However it is much more likely if an outcome is unfavorable that it will significantly hinder any future opportunities for the poorer player.

On the other hand, a loss for the wealthier player is unlikely to significantly effect future outcomes for them. The only likely way for a wealthy player to have a significant loss if they land a devastatingly bad deal with another equally or more wealthy player. The chances of that happening at random is pretty low overall, and gets lower the wealthier you are.
If storage lifetime is increasing it might not be so bad.

Or compression/deduplication.

As long as they have consistent ad revenue, they’ll be ok.
Whether or not you buy an iPhone full retail, or at 0% interest, that monthly service fee is the same.

Carriers haven't subsidized phones for years now. I think the GP is mistaken. There is no "free phone tax" is you pay monthly for your phone.
bc it's because of covid / covid related measurements, people would start to get angry and scared
Thank you for your comment. I had no idea, and appreciate the correction and lesson.

My old neighborhood in Brooklyn always had filming, and my current town is on its third movie shot on main st so far this year - I wonder if those are usually subsidized too.
Agreed. I've always felt such a randomized selection is the only way to have a representative set of people.

The people in legislative positions have a lot of power and there is no way to prevent that since the whole point is for them to have power to run the country.

Thus, it inherently attracts the sort of people who crave power and influence, which is exactly the sort of people who should not be allowed to have it.

So the only solution I can think of is to make it impossible to actively seek those positions of power, by assigning them randomly.
Tech support, a long time ago, in which the quick calls were extremely rare. Diagnosing a problem on the customers end or on our end, each took a lot of time.

I've also wasted hours of my life on hold with customer service "people" who, in the best case, take 5 minutes to hear my situation, 15 minutes to check into it, 5 more minutes to apparently not do the thing they said they were going to do, and 0 seconds to forget about all these details after hanging up, meaning I had to go through the same pattern all again the next call. Even in the cases where I've directed reps to look at previous tickets for history, half the time they still can't find it.

I'm sure that there are many people that use support instead of clicking around to the right option on the website, even though that seems abhorrent waste of time to anyone with half a clue. But companies optimizing for this are doing a disservice to everyone that is only using higher touch methods because they're trying to solve uncommon situations.

I can believe that "modern" support only takes a few minutes per the request, because each individual request is itself just a cog in the larger machine. When I spend an hour on the phone, bounced back and forth between 3-4 departments, how long was each of those conversations? Like so many things these days, the problem is with the overall constructive behavior rather than the myopic metrics that have been over optimized.

And don't get me started on those useless freeform voice prompts. Don't make the customer distill their problem down into a curt description, because once again, they're likely calling with a weird problem. Just give me the numeric options that mirror your business structure and I'll pick the most appropriate one, thank you.
unfortunately one of the largest regions:

https://github.com/patmyron/cloud/#ip-addresses-per-region
State of PostgreSQL 2022–13 Tools That Aren't psql
Doubt. iPhone 13 is $30/month. All too easy to get on the iPhone upgrade program and perpetually give Apple $30/month.
Show HN: Django REST Framework and Open API 3 Tutorial