skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sure.

The funding was secured to protect $military comms. Allegedly the $military actively uses it, so it better be actually secure, especially when malicious foreign enemy actors have had two decades to study it. Academics have studied it to death, and some of their discovered attacks have actually resulted in transitioned improvements. I myself have the benefit of (1) being extremely familiar with how it works on the lowest level and what its weaknesses are, and (2) not considering myself a target worth my $govt's close monitoring.
Those were very good points and def. introduced a new way of thinking about it! I will check out the links, thanks!
I read this and _instantly_ wonder if it's viable for certificate extraction to bypass the god-awful NAT system in AT&T's equipment, a-la pfatt: https://github.com/MonkWho/pfatt

Edit: Ah yes, this is covered in the section "Obtaining the certificate via reboot & exploitation"

Sadly my hardware appears to be patched.
Agreed. The fact is, even with solar, generating way more than I consume during peak hours, I STILL want to conserve, because that means I get more credits for charging the car overnight. It's not really "free energy" during the day if using it means I end up paying more for what I use overnight.
Is that really a problem now that the overwhelming majority of C++ programs run on 64bits platforms?
Hanford had nuclear reactors.

But that is despite the point. Their safety record with nuclear is horrendous. Full of examples of neglect and pollution. I’m not an expert in the nuclear history of the US military, but I wouldn’t be surprised that many of their smaller reactors have similar stories as Hanford. It is just not as spectacular—and therefor not as much in the public consciousness—as Chernobyl.
> You just don't factor in race.

You may not want to factor in race, but society already has. People aren't spherical cows in a vacuum.
An Astronomer's Introduction to NumPyro
But isn't the price of cow milk held artificially high?
Pretty much every brokerage I use shows what the historical asset allocations are. It sounds like you haven't done this much before? Also, you're super-duper angry which is getting in the way of you resolving whatever issue you think there is. I would have started this by contacting my asset manager and introducing myself and thanking them for caring for my money, then having a discussion about what possible asset allocations could have a higher rate of return.

Don't forget, 529s are tax-free- you pull from them without paying taxes.
Absolutely! It just wasn't worth the cost to me at say $9k+. For a couple thousand, sure.
The amount of times it refused to give my password for a repair and they in returned refused warranty is more too often. Luckily it was mostly their bluf.
Similarly, elite racing drivers typically start karting around 6-8.
My wife stopped teaching remote CS classes mostly because the cheating was so completely out-of-hand that grading was pointless and miserable.

Doesn't matter how creative or new or engaging the homework assignments were. Over half the class pays someone, shares work, or finds someone to do it for them.
The binary compatibility is the big deal. The other safe languages have explicitly taken the view the interop with C++ is bad, and so we should instead do interop with the significantly less safe C instead.

The real killer is that the lack of any interaction with C++ means that you can’t do any real incremental adoption of one of those safe languages in any big security critical projects. Saying that the solution to C++ is to just not use it ignores the reality that C++ exists, and large projects in C++ exist. It doesn’t matter if you don’t like C++.

The final problem with the safe languages - with the exception of swift - is that they are all hell bent on not providing even just basic ABI stability. It doesn’t matter how “safe” your language is if the first thing you have to do is make a pure C (even losing potential for automatic lifetime management the C++ would allow) interface.

So I can have two libraries both written in rust, and the entire safety of it is contingent on each library talking to the other through a C API.
With all of those issues, maybe it would be better to return them?
Yes. That is correct.

NYC has alternate side of the street parking on most streets which means that for a two hour period, typically midday, on Mon/Thu or Tue/Fri. This has the effect of making you move your car every 72 hours, and it is trivially enforceable. Additionally there are 1 & 2 hour spots which are typically metered.
tbh i think there's a special element on baldness but i dont know why. but we haven't elected a bald president since TV (when we rly started seeing them lots) even tho we've elected ppl who aren't otherwise as handsome so that says smth.
If we had all that then all the things besides energy that are used in production would be depleted faster. We would have bigger populations, etc.
Hmm, the reason for me would be the cars seem sort of crappy. Who cares about the CEO’s “antics”, just seems really immature
Wow: all my years using MacOS, and I did not know this:

> macOS has a wonderful input mechanism where you press and hold a key on your keyboard to display the accent menu.

The depth of my ignorance may be unbounded....

Anyhow, thanks! I'll use it!
https://archive.ph/HYjJl
Based on what you shared so far, I highly doubt, there is anything you can do to change what already happened. 99.99% they have clauses that they are not responsible for the market performance.
And as someone else here already said, they probably invested this very conservatively hence the low return.

IMO: Find out what they invested this money into ASAP

based on that, transfer this account somewhere else, change the allocation based on risk you are willing to take
This is false dichotomy. The US government also had the option of investing in renewables as early as the 1970s. They simply didn’t. The success of Germany’s recent investment suggests that was a wrong choice.
Because most people who claim to be against the principle of censorship are really only against viewpoints they agree with being censored. In particular, they're usually not just indifferent but happy when viewpoints they oppose are censored.
The Universities in Australia make so much money from international students that they're also disincentived to prevent cheating. Theirs been many anecdotes posted to the Australian subreddit of professors discovering cheating students and being strongly discouraged by the faculty to punish them.

Ultimately the universities are exchanging reputation for near term profits. When I hire in Melbourne for graduate software engineers the university they trained at is not a signal to me at all (despite all the advertising for say Melbourne University promoting how employees regard their distinguished degrees) and I rely purely on technical ability.
There was a time where there was a huge advantage to individualistic societies over collectivist. Rule-breakers built the companies, invented the technologies that super-charged their economies.

Now in a modern, globalized world any new technologies are immediately imported(stolen?) and produced more cheaply and exported back undercutting/crippling the benefits that would otherwise have been had.
… is unrelated to software as far as I am aware
People aren't attacking the delusional and temporarily embarassed billionaires and telling them to focus on a more realistic FIRE.

They are pouring gas on their delusions, big difference compared to the reaction to people who play the lottery.
By the quoted numbers the lottery is literally 45% tax.

You seem to be arguing that it's a fun fantasy, so what's the harm in playing? That misses the point completely. My comment is not that the lottery is bad or should not be played but that it is a regressive tax. We could eliminate or greatly reduce the tax and double the number of winners.

I don't think the government should be funded by taking money from the poor. What's the tax on golf resorts or yacht rentals or things that rich people do for fun? Is it 45% of revenue?

Maybe it's a very HN/reddit take to be suspicious of regressive taxes, but I think it's basically status quo bias to reason that the 45% revenue tax on poor people's recreation is fine because that's the way it is - or whatever reason you think this is fine.
Because can you honestly say that you paid $80K to learn? That was your primary goal of spending all that money?

It certainly was not mine. Learning wasn't in my top 5 reasons to attend university.
> And why you're still on a 32-bit system

There is a lot of 32 bit microcontrollers, most notable stm32
> It's also interesting how people say "never forget" w.r.t. WW2 atrocities, but when it comes to atrocities done against China it quickly becomes "get over it".

I don't say that personally, but you're completely misinterpreting the meaning of that. It's about making sure that any one (any country) doesn't repeat the atrocities done by specific countries in WW2. China's version of never forget is about a twisted sense of revenge about what was done to it, not about messaging to its own people to never repeat the things that were done to it. (In fact many in China seems to take the opinion that if something was done to China then it's okay for China to do it to others, which is completely opposite of the messaging you're comparing it to.)

> But please tell me why Starlink has uncontrolled reentry, and why there's not a similar amount of outrage against that.

Because Starlink is explicitly designed to be 100% demisable (burn up) in the atmosphere so it cannot harm anyone on the ground. Indeed despite there has been about 100 re-entries of Starlink satellites, and no debris have been found. That's why people don't complain about it to the same level. (Plenty of people still complain or invent reasons to complain, like that it's creating too much aluminum in the atmosphere, so it's not without it's complaints.) SpaceX has indeed had debris de-orbit and hit the ground, other than Starlink, and people have complained about that. They were also MUCH smaller than the Chinese stages however. You have to remember that these are some of the biggest single objects re-entering in human history. There have been only 3 objects that have been heavier to re-enter in an uncontrolled fashion. The bigger and heavier they are, the more debris are likely to survive to hit people or objects on the ground.

> You mean Japanese aren't known to do things that they don't like at an individual level, but still do because they feel compelled to for the benefit of the group? What do you think the phenomenon of not being able to turn down a boss invitation to group drinking exactly is? Why do you think Japanese has fewer problems with masks?

I explicitly was talking about the value that Japan places on an individual's life versus other countries. For example, to what extant a culture is willing to sacrifice an individual's life for the benefit of the greater good.

> Woah, now where does this accusation come from? Do you have any sources backing up your claim that this is what they're doing?

You were just doing it. You were extrapolating CCP values to all of Asia. That's why I mentioned it in ( ) as a side comment.
1-sphere
Regardless of what she meant, my issue was with putting it in quotes.

I also doubt she was targeting black kids consciously. Even if many people (including herself) tended to think of gang members as young and Black.
One of the reasons why punishments used to be so harsh in the past was that enforcement was very inconsistent. In premodern times, it might take a lot of individual crimes before a repeat offender was caught. Given that most crime tends to be committed - even today - by a small, but prodigiously active subset of the general population, once someone was caught stealing, robbing or murdering, there was a tacit assumption that it was a career criminal. Who, in case of a light punishment, would go on stealing, robbing and murdering his peers for the next ten years or so.

Which is why permanent incapacitation - mostly by the sword or the gallows, but sometimes by being sent on the galleys, into the mines etc., which was scarcely more survivable than an actual execution, only that it took much longer to die - was the usual judicial punishment. At the very least, the criminal was branded so that he would be instantly recognizable forever.

Nowadays, the police has a lot more tech at its disposal. If it is willing to do so and financed to do so, it can catch basically any criminal it wants to. That is why our laws no longer resemble the Bloody Code of early modern Britain.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloody_Code
Retries, JSON coercions and so on do have Clojure libraries for them, so I am not sure why you want to solve these problems yourself, let alone a dozen times. Really not sure what your exact point is.
Why too late? First thing is to ditch multiple choice exams, prefer essay type questions. That instantly makes it much harder to cheat.
Ditch also homework unless they are essays, and finally makes exams physically, old school style, without computer.
That is my plan. Their support is Mon-Fri working hours. I want to call their support and ask them if indeed z-wave is only usable if I register the lock, hook it up with their app and give up functionality of using it in standalone/offline mode. If they confirm there's no other way, I will return and buy something from a competitor instead.
> How, exactly?

Consider two students with equal intelligence and equal skill at studying.

One lives in a rich suburban neighborhood where schools are well-funded and the parents have the time and money to supply constant extracurricular attention to their children.

The other lives in a single-parent household in a historically redlined urban neighborhood where the school budgets are peanuts and he has to work a part-time job on the side to help support his family.

Which one is going to have the more impressive transcript in college applications?
You're going to have to appeal, and cross your fingers your lawyer can demonstrate that
A) the judge was unfairly biased
B) violated precedent aggriegiously by disregarding the jury in the manner they did.

Short of that... Them's the breaks.
So... bring back the "old school" exams, pens, papers, large classroom, one professor, 2, 3 TAs walking around, no phones or computers, only paper and pen, and since it's university level, memorizing stuff is stupid, so either let them have books/notes or atleast a piece of paper (or more) with formulas or whatever is needed (because let's be fair, "cheat sheets" will always be a posibility, and even the best doctors and engineers google stuff all the time).

Some minimal cheating is still possible, but otherwise, it's a lot better than the current online situation.
> So Darwin doesn’t explain the human condition and why the just might fall due to sickness or the wicked become rich and prolific

You're changing the measure. Just-ness is not a measure of Fit-ness. Nor is Wicked-ness a measure of Unfit-ness.
It looks like imgui, a declarative UI library optimized to be rendered by the GPU : https://github.com/ocornut/imgui
The app specifically creates swap iff it detects it is running on Fly.io: https://github.com/serverless-dns/serverless-dns/blob/9cb3f4...
> Sure, but we're teaching kids lessons for when they're adults, right? Is it really a good idea to raise a generation who will not act out of self-defense?

Perhaps this is my response to office gossip. But I'm talking about my coworker who regularly brags about corporal punishment and how he's a good father for hitting his kid on the regular.

There's a lot of people out there. I don't think you and I are in much disagreement, although perhaps I didn't write my words in a way that suited your perspective.

There's still a generation of parents who think that hitting their kids is the right response, be it from occasional spanking, or even wholesale beating them up to teach them a lesson.

Beating up kids / corporal punishment isn't about "self defense", but instead about "learned helplessness". Its a different strategy to parenting, and some people still believe in it.
Yeah, the premise that the concept of societal consequences for acting out or against the status quo is so alien to Western culture that Americans literally can't comprehend it is absurd.

Also see "don't stick your neck out," "the squeaky wheel gets replaced," "don't rock the boat," "speech is silver, silence is golden", "shit rolls downhill", several Biblical proverbs and some Shakespeare.
well, Jeff Bezos didn't seem to need one
In fairness this is as opposed to Go? Swift? Rust? Java? C#?

Then C and C++ are defacto controlled by private companies: Google+Apple do pretty much all the clang development, MS does MSVC - if they choose not to implement a feature that’s approved, or implement one that isn’t, that is the de facto standard.

You can argue it would require all three to agree on something, but that’s still essentially making WG21 somewhat irrelevant.
A better link https://github.com/bloomberg/comdb2
Is it chegg or is it the institutions?

I'd posit it's the latter; huge sums of money are at-risk for a fail grade not to mention time invested. People want to get on with their lives. Meanwhile institutions act as gatekeepers while jointly setting arbitrary standards and acting with the pretense that they're institutions of higher learning which simply isn't the case: they produce licensure for occupations. All of that pretense, the arbitrary expectations set makes it far more worthwhile to cheat. Why type up a paper on Shakespeare in a class deemed mandatory that a student has zero interest in or application for? And that can be stated about so many facets of college, the textbooks I've been expected to buy are formatted like a dumpster fire. The tuition I'm paying for what is essentially proctoring burns my ass. The fact I can get superior products across the board and actually have a gamut of options in instruction, methods, curriculum and resources - at significantly lower cost makes it a whole lot more justifiable both at the ethical and at the rational level to "cheat", I find it strange that someone might be upset that someone is swindling the swindler.

Having said that, I'd propose a bifurcation: actual higher learning institutions and vocational institutions. This weird amalgam that has developed, by my reckoning at least, results in the worst of both worlds.
>It’s only the 36.7% that from coal where the numbers come close

The problem is, when you add that demand to your power grid, is that increasing the supply of hydro, nuclear, wind, or solar? In practice, the extra demand from EVs only increases the correlated amount of coal used as that is where the excess of potential electricity generation is, for now.
The link you provide seems to say that the cost of wholesale PV + storage is $85-$158 (bottom figure, line 3). Am I misreading that?

I’ve noticed that many solar+storage installations these days are 4-hour storage, so not sufficient for baseload. I think the number would be higher if we were shooting for baseload from our storage.
So... something reminiscent of Pickle Rick, from Rick and Morty? (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pickle_Rick)

Spoiler: Rick lands himself in a pickle, and "lacking any means of mobility, he bites the head of a cockroach and walks upon its back by stimulating its brain with his tongue. After assembling more cockroaches into a crude exoskeleton, he sets up a lab and upgrades to a powered exoskeleton made of rat corpses."

Fun episode!
Yes, our previous efforts worked so well after all...
Completely agree on all the points, we burn oil in ICE engines simply because it's ready for direct use, but what if we switched to natural gas fueled cars?

ICE engines can easily be adapted to use it, the infrastructure for gas pumps is already in place, I do not own a car but when I need one I use my mother's car that runs on methane gas.

Of course EV fueled by 100% green energy is the future we all hope for, but I wouldn't discard the economic advantage, especially in less developed countries, of cheap cars that run on greener fuel.

There are also many countries like China or Germany that are heavily reliant on coal for energy production right now, because it makes it easier to adapt the output to the demand, maybe a more mixed approach instead of "EV or die" could lead to a faster transition curve toward less CO2 intensive vehicles and one that is economically more feasible on a global scale.

I also doubt Brazil will be full of Tesla anytime soon.
Yeah, I was confused by the name carbon, but am able to recognize that what I think of by default is not relevant anymore.
Comdb2: Distributed SQLite by Bloomberg
Is it? Neither memorizing information, doing good work (beyond what will make the boss happy), nor integrity have been important at any of my workplaces.
read: https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Bogleheads®_investment_philo...

for future investment decisions.
It's fine to have exams on computers, as long as they're university-owned computers in a lab and not, say, the students' personal laptops at home.
You have a point indeed. You don't pay that much money to fail. That puts countries with free university in another perspective
There is a standard android feature for years that works the same: Guest Account.
Anyway I would wipe my device before sending it to repairs.
> Despite that, the public opinion soured so bad, that it is the detractors that had to bring disaster to nuclear reactors. Protestors fired rocket-propelled grenades at a plant[0]. It did not cause any nuclear danger.

The wiki article you linked says the plant was unfinished. This would indicate the attack was a protest against the construction of the plant, not an attempt to induce a nuclear meltdown. You are perhaps unintentionally twisting the facts.
Someone didn’t read the article :)
I got as far as “surely they can’t be talking about OS 9, someone must have recycled the name”
Russia can’t intercept ICBMs. Distance doesn’t matter.
The difference is that one is distributed to people in order of requests and the other is distributed strictly to those who can afford the highest bid.

Naturally, people with the most affluence would prefer the free market approach. Everyone else would prefer a non-zero chance of getting a plot eventually rather than a zero chance of being able to afford one at all.
It's easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of Facebook
Turning off Unifi Band steering was key to fixing my moonlight home streaming setup. That and disabling 2.4Ghz entirely for the network I use to stream on. Also manually picking the fastest channel by checking each one individually and testing it. Now I can stream 4k VR @ 72 hz no problem. Haven’t had to touch my router settings since doing this.

My situation is so many nearby unique Wi-Fi networks, >160 detectable by my router alone. Lends itself to interference issues if not done perfectly.
Man, the drive-by downvotes are weird. I can't remember if the site settled on (officially or otherwise) a "Downvotes indicate disagreement" or a "Downvotes indicate violation of site rules and regulations" policy, but if they settled on the former, that's quite a shame.

Some of the most interesting and informative conversations I've ever had have been with people who held opinions that were as opposed to mine as they could possibly get.

And -in truth- the core of your comment (Folks just want to get on with their lives.) is broadly applicable to _most_ big boogeymen... child snatchers, street thugs, terrorists (domestic or otherwise), etc, etc, etc. In the overwhelming majority of cases, folks simply don't want to start shit, and -when made by Officials- claims to the contrary are nearly always attempts to increase the power and/or wealth of that official and/or their cronies.
>They get all their training from google, youtube, fb

Not sure if you are sarcastic or not. I totally blame them. I mean would you ask your drug dealer how to quit drugs?