skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Further the guidelines on composers that are likely to apply to him are listed below. It is not at all clear that he meets the bar here.

From the info I have, the only criteria he may meet is #1 for in the first group, and it is not actually clear that "soundtrack for DBZ" is a notable composition. for a TV show soundtrack to qualify as notable, it would need to be something often written about. For example, if a show is discussed for its music almost as often as for its plot, then sure the soundtrack is probably notable. I don't think that actually applies here.

And even if so, if he is only really known for one work (which pretty much is the case), that would generally be merged with the article for that work. So he could be mentioned in the "Sound Track of DBZ" article if one existed, or the "soundtrack" section of the main DBZ article.

------

Composers, songwriters, librettists or lyricists, may be notable if they meet at least one of the following criteria:

1. Has credit for writing or co-writing either lyrics or music for a notable composition.
2. Has written musical theatre of some sort (includes musicals, operas, etc.) that was performed in a notable theatre that had a reasonable run, as such things are judged in their particular situation, context, and time.
3. Has had a work used as the basis for a later composition by a songwriter, composer or lyricist who meets the above criteria.
4. Has written a composition that has won (or in some cases been given a second or other place) in a major music competition not established expressly for newcomers.
5. Has been listed as a major influence or teacher of a composer, songwriter or lyricist that meets the above criteria.
6. Appears at reasonable length in standard reference books on their genre of music.

Where possible, composers or lyricists with insufficient verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article should be merged into the article about their work. When a composer or lyricist is known for multiple works, such a merger may not be possible.

---

Composers and performers outside mass media traditions may be notable if they meet at least one of the following criteria:

1. Is frequently covered in publications devoted to a notable music sub-culture.

2. Has composed a number of notable melodies, tunes or standards used in a notable music genre.

3. Is cited in reliable sources as being influential in style, technique, repertory or teaching for a particular music genre.

4. Is cited by reliable sources as having established a tradition or school in a particular music genre.

5. Has been listed as a significant musical influence on musicians or composers who meet the above criteria.
Readers interested in these arguments can find more at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Inclusionism and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Deletionism.
This is a common argentinian conception, and it is a big misconception. Gov corruption is a lot worse in the united states. It's just that corruption is not a 1-1 correlation with the success of an economy.

Argentina has a poor economy because it is a half-capitalist half-socialist country.
I wouldn't put much stock in MSR languages until they get usage in other orgs. There's at least a dozen research languages in flight at a given point in time.

They used to have this great site were you could interact with them all: https://web.archive.org/web/20180130101736/https://www.rise4...

Source: I'm a former member of RiSE
Not exactly. A musician who is very popular but for whom there is not significant coverage in reliable independent sources would likely not meet the notability requirements.
Sounds like they should separate fiscal policy and monetary policy like the US, Congress/President and the Federal Reserve.
Don't forget the historic laundromats!
Lot's of folks care, what are you talking about? Accountants and lawyers the world over EXTREMELY care about keeping the computers idea of wall-clock time and your idea of time in sync, and if you're a customer faced with the side-effects of changing the standard after-the-fact, you probably care as well.

Let's paint a picture based on actual code I've actually seen in the real world. If you ignore the leap second but keep using UTC, then in about 5 years, UTC will differ from wall clock by about 5 seconds. So if, in some software used for, I don't know maybe billing customers, someone was calculating day boundaries by doing modulo division of UTC by the number of seconds in a day (I've seen it), then in 5 years we've got a 5 second discrepancy in the number of API calls made by customer X when comparing what the software says to what the customer measured. Customers don't like this, accountants and lawyers REALLY don't like this, and us engineers will have the wonderful experience of telling them all

> "this code used to be valid until some boneheaded engineers at Facebook convinced a ton of other engineers to break the agreed upon standard about what it means to measure time in this way, and now things that used to work fine need to be patched because we've got a Y2K EVERY DAY!"

Oops, I guess ignoring wall clock time might be something other human people care about after all.
All of social media is broken right now.

Instagram actively hides pics from my step kids, nephew and niece to show me "reels" from people I don't follow. Last night a photo from my step daughter flickered briefly and then was lost. I couldn't find it again until this morning. I literally can't find their content anymore without scrolling and dodging videos that keep popping up.

Youtube broke entirely a few months ago. The content creators I've subscribed to are now rarely in my feed which is full of "recommended for you" videos and movies for rent. Several content creators I follow have their business dying from sudden drop in ad revenue due to the changes.

Facebook does this weird thing were after someone I know recommends a video, my feed switches to recommended videos entirely until I click back to home. Stuff appears from friends or family days after posting, now at the top of my feed.

Twitter is, surprisingly, the least broken, at least I mostly still see the people I follow. I still miss stuff because of the algorithm, but it's not, yet, forcing a ton of stuff I'm not actually following down my throat. And the ads are still clearly ads.
"Sensible measures" like that don't get picked because ultimately all cryptocurrency is a zero-sum game, and getting rid of all of them would save us a lot of time, manhours and wasted Internet conversations. But ideas like that are too sensible, so we give people the freedom to build whatever blockchain-garbage they want, because that's their sovereign choice.
> Instead companies like Amazon and Apple are obsessed with generating real world value for the customers and let financial value follow.

While I would argue that even Apple is mostly about execution not innovation (many of Apple innovations had been around for a while, but apple took execution to a different level), but Amazon?! What are the big Amazon innovations? The one click checkout? Having pushed selling books online (arguably failing to become profitable for a long time)? I would say amazon is of all these companies the example which shows that you don't need to innovate anything as long as you have enough finances to push massively into any market you want.
When will senate pass a technological test.

Lets make these blokes take a MINIMAL entry level exam;

* What is a data base

* What is personal identifiable identification and why does it mattter

* What does a walled garden mean

So many functionally identifiable comms

These fucking morons cant even state the above.

De-Seat them all.
You didn't have that experience though. Or if you did you don't remember anything from it. The whole point of general anesthesia is you don't experience anything while under it.
There are absolutely free markets, usually small, niche, some under ground. Just because you don't see it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. The world, and its economies, are more complex then you, I or anyone on this board can comprehend
https://archive.ph/V9ALy
I disagree. Creativity != art.
What's worse: that person, or the company that that person runs, that has 10x the units that he might have otherwise, with a protective layer between the owner and the tenant?
>Interesting that the people who hate it so much are the same ones that are using it.

You're jumping the gun there. The people who hate it and use it are the people who were using it before the change and want it to go back. They were strongarmed into it and they're not about to abandon their userbase/followers overnight - they'll try and advocate for change and then migrate elsewhere.

But these changes are so relatively new that there hasn't even been time for any of that to play out yet.
The illegal dollar market is not where major operations are done, and so, it doesn't affect anything to a great degree. It's small in the sense a few big whales can manipulate it.

> It's not that the dollar goes higher: the peso goes down.

Well, yes. If you are from Argentina, you know what I meant. If the agricultural sector only "thinks in dollars", then why do they regularly push for a peso devaluation, talk about "competitivity" of the peso vs the dollar, and must be forced to liquidate their dollars in a reasonable time? They obviously care about the relative value of the peso vs the dollar.
From that link (which is a blog post by the researcher):

> there's a cleverness and tightness of expression in Dennett's actual answer that's missing in the blander answers created by our fine-tuned GPT-3.

I found this a very interesting observation. Dennet's answers contain a lot of information in few words. They're also quite witty. The GPT-3 responses (when they even address the question) sound like talking-point answers from someone who has read quite a bit in the area.
In that region, mostly AK-47s and RPG-7s, plus whatever other random weapons they managed to scrounge. Same as every irregular paramilitary force throughout the Middle East and Africa.
Was lead really so fun? It seems everyone was playing with it before it started being regulated.
Yeah man, back before covid scared the living shit out of people like you I'm sure there was 'sureness'. So much 'sureness' that major investors in Fidelity were cutting huge chunks of one of the only MRNA companies valuations:

https://www.statnews.com/2017/01/10/moderna-trouble-mrna/
https://www.statnews.com/2017/06/28/moderna-writedown/

The only thing you were sure of is that you were terrified, and wanted anything and anyone to save you.

But hey I'm sure all those auto-immune diseases cropping up from the vaccines fall into the category of "sureness" :D
Most people would expect there to be a table on the "Clio Awards" Wikipedia page that lists award winners. I don't think anyone would object if such a table was added to the page; just nobody has done it yet.

But there is a difference between having someone's name listed in a table on a page in Wikipedia, and that person needing an entire Wikipedia article about them.

If there's only one notable fact about someone, then that fact is data, and is best recorded together with other data of the same shape, to put it in the context of its meaning.

It's only when there are many distinct notable facts about someone, all of different shapes, where the best way to connect all those facts together is in carefully-formatted prose, that the right way to record that data becomes "a distinct Wikipedia page for that topic."
Lol the whole point of the US design was to allow the free market internally. Externally it was designed to be protectionist.

I agree “free market” today is insane. Initially the federal governments only source of revenue was tariffs, so it would protect domestic production. This makes the US independent and wealthy.

You can’t have an international “free market” system unless you don’t want to protect domestic production. Which imo is what the US did starting in the 70s until today.
I think this experiment shows that humans overestimate their innate creativity. Most of thoughts build upon earlier thoughts and experiences. A sophisticated language model can emulate most of our routine thoughts. The philosopher Gurdjieff and Zen philosophers say we drift though life in low awareness and in mental ruts. They propose mental exercises to improve this.
This is the 23rd year in a row that people have been saying this, at the rate we're going, globalization will be undone any minute now.

This is just a taxpayer gift to multinationals. If you want to undo globalization, handouts aren't the solution, tariffs are.
What happens when you send 1 DAI
How does a virus that's pretty good at spreading through humans but not yet amazing at spreading through humans stay in an isolated region for months or even years?
Have the DOD force its suppliers to make their things in the US? Only allow them to import raw materials or low value manufactured elements. Just throwing ideas, might not be practical...

Are there controls on what suppliers charge? If not, what prevents them from charging as much or more than would be spent on subsidies? If so, what prevents suppliers from just choosing to opt out of the transaction entirely?
Security was a blatant and transparent excuse for their protectionism. The same information has been and is available for practically anyone in the world, thanks to many different map service providers, satellite image providers, and even Korean map service companies making their service available outside Korea.
Steve Jobs famously said that he saw the computer as a "bicycle of the mind." He saw technology as a tool to amplify humanity's abilities.

Mark Zuckerberg has chosen to build a "casino of the mind." Facebook and Instagram have been purpose-built to amplify and prey on humanity's weaknesses.

The fact that "Meta" is now trying to make their casino _even more_ addictive to compete with TikTok does not bode well for the world.
And the "wave" was a handful of unrelated fires that happened near churches (not even in churches for most of them) over a few years and were mounted as a "wave of arson" by extreme-right websites during the height of Syrian refugees influx.

The original website that had a map of these events (that you had to look up yourself to see they amounted to nothing) isn't even online anymore as far as I can see, now this false fact is just a urban legend with a life of its own.
This partially answers the previous post, but it doesn't answer all of the concerns he mentioned.

Even if you have an On-Prem deployment, if Warrant goes belly up, you're still hosed. Unsupported code is a recipe for disaster. What if it has a critical security vulnerability and it can't be patched? Is it legal to keep the code deployed once the contract expires and can't be renewed?

As a former Security Engineer that worked alongside the SRE team, we would never be able to justify this dependency for a production system. We'd rather build it ourselves or live with the crappier version than deal with a black box that can take down the business.

The flip side of this is an Open Source project. We regularly built around Open Source projects instead of starting from scratch when we could.

Have y'all considered moving to a license like BSL or AGPL for what you're building?
One that I've run into several times is suicide. Most of the time, the person isn't in immediate danger. I've been around when people were.

I'm not going to go into any detail for people's privacy, but it took over an hour to figure out who a regular member of a community was in real life and then get emergency services in another country to them. Got independent confirmation they got dragged to a hospital in time. They weren't exactly grateful afterwards, but they stayed in the community and didn't repeat the attempt.
"I wish these services were a monolith so there was any amount of discoverability at all, and I don't have to beg for time from busy people on other teams to help me use their undocumented APIs"
Those photos are really beautiful.
The dictatorship is 'some businessmen' to you? That's an strange interpretation.
And Macri's business become big thanks to its links to government (you can check the story of 'grupo macri' in wikipedia).
I can't get on there myself with over 20 years of making and publishing music and being on radio etc... And for that same reason can't get verified on Twitter and many other sites I promote my music work on.

First of all, Wikipedia has banned all T-Mobile IPs from being able to even log in to my account... 10 years ago when I tried to post my biography there, they rejected it for lack of notability... Twitter also requires an entry to be published on Wikipedia for artists, now I could probably wait forever until someone still never writes one about me, or I could choose to pay a renowned publication to run a fluff piece on me like many other musicians do.

I am so tired of the manufactured gatekeeping nonsense that is required of me just to make music and be heard, no wonder why so many quit the business... ugh.
You have an infinite amount of restrictions around how much, when and what you need to do to get them. Basically rationing.
What are Chinese companies doing metaverse wise?
The problem of panpsychism is that it doesn’t explain anything. It postulates some sort of mechanism that builds up our consciousness based on what amounts to a dual realm of psychic mechanics, but it doesn’t explain at all how this nonphysical mechanism is supposed to be able to account for consciousness in a way that the known laws of physics allegedly can’t.
It's very very very common. Look at "Who's hiring?" threads - most roles are "Remote/US".

Companies do it mostly due to timezone and beurocratic reasons (they can't pay salary/tax abroad).
You can't wave the magic wand of national security and justify any inefficient or ineffective attempt at stealing from the future to goose the present.

The short term goal should be to diversify critical US supply chains away from a country that is currently considered by the US to be an competitor. I'm sure you remember that US official policy since the 70s is the "One China Policy" which admits that Taiwan is a part of China and that only attempts to reunify by force will be responded to(*). So the US needs to move supply chains out of PRC/ROC, but moving them to S. Korea, Japan, or dozens of other friendly nations is an acceptable goal from a national security standpoint.

* - I'm not a fan of this, but it is what it is. I didn't realize it until recently.
I used to have some ignored, but nowadays i live with the files showing up as untracked.
There are many draconian measures in effect making practically any attempt at arbitraging illegal.
Nope. Not at all. Not sure where you got that info, but I would question that source.

It's because the CMOS sensors are much more sensitive to IR than our eyes, so they expose in that frequency range which causes the images to not develop the way we expect them. For astrophotography, lots of very interesting data comes from the IR bands, so removing the filter gets a lot more details.
I don't take two lineages to be conclusive evidence of multiple zoonotic events. However, the multiple polytomies for each are not easy to explain away.

Have you read Pekar's most recent paper in Science? I raise this in earnest, I'm reading it now. A lot of it follows the preprint, but the update more directly addresses many of the points we're discussing.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abp8337

My problem with the "just a couple mutations" deniers is that that viewpoint doesn't speak to any of the real phylogenic questions here.
It's really hard to explain to folks that "RStudio" makes software for languages besides R! The old brand will stick around for the RStudio IDE itself.
The commit was (supposedly) made on March 32nd.
Or people simply disagree with it. Economics is a Social Science and largely based on opinion, not fundamental properties of the universe.

Racism is defined in many academic circles as "prejudice plus power". Are people 'wrong' if they disagree and think it ought to be defined differently?
They're going to have a hard time evenly enforcing this conduct when Apple and Google enter the field. Both of those companies have basically relied on aqui-hires to build their VR/AR stacks, hopefully they also have to answer for their peculiar "innovation" tactics.
The church institution is not the artist, they were the artists' sponsor and commissioned the work.
Anecdotal, but I've seen a few people say "I don't really use Instagram anymore" since these changes. For me it's pretty bad, and I'll probably only look at people's reels from now on. They really did just completely butcher the app, and I would bet money on their usership among young people going down over the next year or 2. Of course, older people are still signing up for instagram, so it's possible it just sort of replaces Facebook.
ok. So you are on your boat. Small craft with three people is rapidly approaching on a direct course. You are nervous so you grab the gun (probably more than 5 seconds because you are out on deck and the biometric safe is fixed in the cabin, but I'll give you a pass on that).

Where do you aim the gun? At them? At the deck?

They see you are holding a gun, get a different look on their face, and one starts to reach under the seat.

What do you do?

Remember you are in a foreign country and don't speak the language, don't know the customs, cannot read the body language, ...
While having to respond to TikTok is understandable, what's their point of differentiation? It's hard to tell the difference between the two now. Maybe that's a good thing for insta?
The issue isn't the delivery, we've always had local food delivery and it's a subsidised bundled service to sell the main product. The issue is whether they can run a tech company off the margins of delivery, where they take the risk setting the physical infrastructure to do delivery, but have little to no control over the actual restaurants providing the products.
That’s what I don’t understand about passing on costs to customers: The idea that a company can just pass additional costs on to the customer implies that the market is willing to bear that passed-on cost. But if the market is already willing to bear it, why wouldn’t the company just charge more today, regardless of whether they have additional costs?
Not having a horse in the the race, android is like orderS of magnitude more secure than your average linux distro.
German uses à for this purpose, there is probably a shared history behind that.
Another example to my sibling comment's one of debt is the stock market. While most of the world that has advanced technology and industry etc. has seen huge gains over the past decades, Japan is still not quite back at the highs they saw in the late 80s - for various demographic and economic reasons that I'm not remotely knowledgable enough to explain.

But see for example the charts (click on "max" to see as far back as possible) on Yahoo Finance for famous indexes of top X companies in each country:

Japan (Nikkei 225): Up 118% today since 1985, but down 29% from 1989's peak
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/%5EN225/

USA (S&P500): Up ~2000% since 1985, technically down ~12% since December but anyone who invested 15+ months ago is still up it's not like a crazy crash
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/%5EGSPC/

UK (FTSE250): Up ~1000% since 1986
https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/quote/%5EFTMC/

Obviously these are limited to the few hundred biggest companies but offer a good snapshot, and it's a similar story if you look at other European countries etc., and a significant problem for Japan (as well as being a metric/indicator caused by significant problems) that their growth has been so far behind.