skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
True. That is part of the reason why only 3 of maybe 30-60 layers are that small.

Analog gets some signal integrity benefits from larger transistors, and often we have fairly large fets for low rdson and high voltage tolerance.
Manchin objected to reversing the cancellation of state and local tax deductions was my understanding. The piece is not clear on this.
Maps and Translate have paid APIs available.
> So does that mean that private is a way to tell the class user that there are functions that touch this variable, to increase the chances that the class user finds and uses them?

I would say private is a way to tell the user to not touch the variable, or to use an accessor function that has validation to prevent entering invalid state.

At this point I feel like I'm just repeating myself, as I can't imagine a concrete example of what you're asking. Could you give a hypothetical, or better yet real, example of what you're thinking of here? I can't think of any at all. I felt that the example by Jtsummers was a great illustration.
Not mentioned here is simply using it in the browser. Way cleaner.
Well, there is Slint in that case, from former Qt devs, but it is still pretty much early days.

https://slint-ui.com/

Check their online demos.
> And when you actually look at the costs of wind/solar (although maybe solar thermal might be useful, but for various reasons its been abandoned) they aren't as cheap as the cost to install them because they have external costs which never get accounted for.

They do get accounted for. One can explicitly account for them by running simulations, using actual weather data, to see how much of those external things would be needed.

If you do that, you discover nuclear isn't going to be cheaper in most places now. That natural gas is currently being used to fill in around renewables does not challenge this point.
Tommy Marcus, the content creator from Brooklyn profits from his instagram fame. Of course he wants the company do to well even if it's at the cost of the users.

He does have a say in the way that facebook acts because he has leverage through his popularity. Not to mention that he is going on the news giving apologia to the corporation. And you're saying we should we should just twiddle our thumbs and not contest his ridiculous ideas because he's not a shareholder or something?
I think OP, and others like myself, are questioning something else. It's not that being creative is different from being "bookish," it's that the two are not mutually exclusive.
Perhaps, if you completely write off the breathtaking economic impact of the manufacturing and operation of Boeing products since its inception.
> here we have Amazon, Microsoft, and Apple all creating new products that people like

And you think that those companies don't test proficiency of working with algorithms when hiring? What?

Two of them (arguably all three) make operating systems. That's just one of many parts of what they do where proficiency in algorithms and data structures is a strong prerequisite.
> It becomes necessary at some (low) value of concurrent write usage basically.

Much less so since the introduction of WAL mode 12 years ago, tho.
Can they? I've seen people make this claim, but I've not seen it actually substantiated. Who has successfully recycled one, what was their yield, what was the cost?
You simply acquire 100+ companies:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mergers_and_acquisitio...
I'm curious: how does this compare to https://www.aserto.com ?
Dang, those jurors must be really upset about Spectrum's monopolistic practices...
Profit isn't a sin, and if you want shareholders to do something for you, why do you think they will want to do it if there is nothing in it for them?
Completely disagree. I love the contrast of this platform vs other social medias. The focus is on the moment, the current discussion. There is no infinite scrolling and timesuck. Also, not recording historical comments makes contributions more authentic. Nobody's trying to get a comment that will go down in platform history. It's like a real conversation. It exists in your memory. I think this minimalism and focus the main reason I really like this site.
Which brings us to, should wikipedia have more domain specific wikis? Why does everyone end up on fandom or some other random wiki site when wikipedia is already ad free, hosted worldwide and ain't going anywhere.

Wikipedia doesn't _have_ to be just a encyclopedic overview of topics, it should have dive ins as deep as you want if there are people willing to write it.
Likely waiting on stolen metaverse R&D from American companies given to them from the Chinese government. That's the entire Chinese nation-state backed hackers MO. Steal R&D from Fortune 500 companies to then give it to private Chinese businesses to further the Chinese economy. Why waste your own time/money/resources on R&D when you can just steal it. Same with IP and IP laws.

- https://www.cbsnews.com/news/chinese-hackers-took-trillions-...

- https://fortune.com/2021/04/21/suspected-chinese-hackers-tar...

- https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/06/china-technolo...
Compared to Articles of Confederation?
> Literally nobody depends on any relationship between UTC and overhead sun angle.

That's just... completely incorrect and totally false? Have you ever even worked for a business? Have you ever read how time libraries are actually written?

Please, go read the Python `datetime` library: https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/0fe645d6fd22a6f57e777... which is used to calculate a UTC timestamp: https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/0fe645d6fd22a6f57e777...

It is literally built on the exact assumption that 0 means January 1, 1970 and that right now is (number of seconds in a day) x (number of days since Jan 1 1970). If we stop adjusting UTC, then by this time next year UTC will be one second out of date with our wall-clock times, and calling `datetime.now().isoformat()` will give us a timestamp that's 1 second off from the wall-time of a user. At one-second past midnight on the 20th of the month, your computer will incorrectly be spitting out timestamps saying it's exactly midnight of the 19th. That's what you might call a major breaking change.
That feels out of scope for OP. I've learned that there is such a thing as apologizing too early, when I don't actually feel sorry yet. I need to take some time to make sense of what happened and apportion responsibility in my own head for precisely what I caused.

Once I arrive at that moment, though, OP feels like it might be priceless.
By this data, everyone is racist?
Show HN: Share your screen to a projector/TV with only a web-browser
I love the family dragon army! But why bother using taming scrolls when you can polymorph control yourself into a dragon (taking off your armor first!) and then sitting to make eggs where they are actual family! Blood may be thicker than water, but dragon scales even thicker than blood!
One potential reason is, SCSS only needs one implementation, and whatever that implementation does is SCSS. If you write `color:hover { ... }` it doesn't really matter whether SCSS happens to parse that as a `color: hover` followed by an illegal `{` token or if it happens to parse it as a nested selector; whichever the parser chooses is fine. But in a standard, with multiple implementations, you need to strictly resolve all ambiguities in the spec so that all implementations parse CSS the same way; just avoiding ambiguities in the grammar is by far the easiest way to achieve that.

Plus, different ways of implementing a parser could have different ways of resolving ambiguities. Maybe parsing `color:hover {}` as a selector happens to be super easy in Firefox's existing parser, but would require a rewrite of Chromium's parser, for example.
> in this article

> those complaints pale in comparison

> Signals contributions which are above your trivial reproach

There's the problem. I never said that or indeed anything like it. Quotes are really out of line there. Eg Never mentioned TFA. Never said complaints were invalid, never described all reproach as trivial in comparison.

> your complaints are entirely valid and I was saying this all along.

Nope not that either. Actually read it again maybe, just what it actually says?

When considering criticism of decisions that led to a billion people using e2e encryption and not mentioning that those decisions directly led to a billion people using e2e encryption then yeah, maybe think about whether that criticisim has been well thought out. At the time of writing there were about 50-100 comments all critical of signal policy and app functioning with nobody mentioning even once that maybe some aspects of that policy, yeah, they actually worked a little bit in a way that was pretty useful.

>It's also possible I just missed the entire point of GGP entirely, for which I apologize if so.

Fair. I'm sure that's general it should be and not directed to me.
What does "isolated region" mean to you?
TSLA also has a lot of labor related discussions open about workplace safety and racism.

(I'm not weighing in on their validity, but it's absolutely truthful the allegations and lawsuits are there.)
That's a mischaracterization.

The passionate grumps don't lack collaboration, patience and tolerance. Instead they have more commitment to the product and company then to power relationships and hierarchies

They may also be impossible to work with but that's independent (alright, it's likely correlated).

Anyway, the hard-nosed ones are closer in spirit to scientists who get mischaracterized as uncooperative inflexible foot-draggers because their advocacies and endorsements aren't a functional of social relationships and ideally can't be changed by them.
Great to see the beginning of the end of Meta / Facebook with their first revenue miss.

Hopefully their metaverse play is a costly fatal distraction that will ultimately lead them to lose more money while lots of people run away from using their platform.

The fact they are ruining their own product [0] to compete with TikTok shows that they have completely run out of ideas.

There is no saving Facebook / Meta this time.

[0] https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/07/27/instagr...
exactly, its very doable for a certain type of brain/personality
Great article! A lot of times articles like this fail to include realistic examples, which this one had a lot of.

I've beaten this drum here before[1], but Dialectical Behavior Therapy, an evidence-based therapy program, has a framework for making requests of people with the acronym DEAR that can also be used for apologies. I think a good DEAR-apology would hit most of the techniques in this article:

* Describe the situation: "Accept responsibility".

"I didn't do X that you asked me to do, even though I knew I should have."

* Express feelings: "Express regret"

"I feel bad about it because I promised I would, and I had time to do it, I just didn't, and I don't have an excuse."

* Ask: "Ask for forgiveness"

"I'm sorry. Will you forgive me?"

* Reinforce: This could be restitution or repentance. I'd argue it's situational depending on whether it's a recurring thing (I'll do it in the future!) or in the past (I didn't defrost the chicken and ruined your dinner party, so I'll cook for the next one!)

Anyways, DBT has a few gems[2], and DEAR is one of them. I use it all the time for both asking people for things and apologies.

--

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31859266

[2] Another one: panic attack or extremely anxious? Get a bowl of cold water and stick your head in it for around 30 seconds. Make sure your whole face, especially your cheeks, are submerged. You can use ice water or just cool water. Take a breath, and repeat until calm. It's based on the dive reflex and is a biological function, it will always work.
i.e. they can't be recycled now.

We judge companies on their actions now, not on what they might do, or might be possible in the future.
Yet in the end you will be more effective and get more done then ever before :).
I got upvoted too, so that doesn't work for me
In most of the United States, that is no longer true. The law previously required a "duty to retreat" if the home owner encountered a potentially violent assailant. However, most states now have "Castle Doctrine" laws which shift the burden of proof from the defense to the prosecutor. [0]

Most prosecutors will not charge a home owner due to this change in laws. Civil liability is separate factor, but criminal charges are rare.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_doctrine
Fahrenheit 451 has a part where they get the entire city to go to their doors to try and spot a fugitive, this action is coordinated by the radios that everyone wears.

With these cameras and recognition algorithms, you don't even need people to go to the doors. Just pull the feeds.
I think the distinction is -> if I threaten you by planting drugs on you, which I am not legally meant to do, then I am extrorting you as I took the initiative.

If you are the one that was doing something illegal to begin with, and bribe an official to keep it under wraps, then it's on you.
I'd love to know what that injection molding toy was if you ever figure it out. There's still a Crayola crayon maker toy which forms molds from heated crayon wax. Not as intense as actual injection molding though

https://www.amazon.com/Crayola-03-9000-Crayon-Maker/dp/B0029...
This was exactly my experience in a dev productivity team that had fulfilled its purpose well enough.

It’s not a lack of creativity, but a lack of mission/vision/true north.

Basically they’re flailing about trying to find something that sticks. If they can’t they’ll go the way of yahoo.
New studies offer theory on cause of unusual hepatitis cases in kids
Admittedly I'm over a decade out of university so things might have changed, but when I was getting my masters in mathematics several of the math professors had various 'side hustles' doing cool and advanced stuff at startups and in industry or finance.

universities are dominated by anti-capitalist sentiment

I know this is trendy to say and I'm sure there are individual universities where it is true, but I see little evidence for it at large. If nothing else every hedge fund and investment bank in the world basically only hire university graduates, and they can hardly be accused of being anti-capitalist. Every economics course I ever took was based, almost axiomatically, on the premise that capitalism is awesome.
Nice. I couldn’t find a scientific sounding name for the kind of alliterative writing, but I did find a book written with similar constraints: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alphabetical_Africa
>The US is in a much different place than Argentina or Greece.

There are many countries with stable economies and currencies despite not using the US dollar natively.
> The fact that Exxon (edit: oops I mean shell) has a higher ESG score than Tesla should be all you need to know.

If you weren't so deeply into Musk intimate parts and repeat word for word his tweet you'd realize that it makes perfect sense.

Exxon only extracts the thing, it doesn't burn it. Tesla burns a lot of energy to build cars.

That's not to say ESG is a perfect system, perfection would be assigning an ESG score at the atomic level, meaning for every single human. At that point it wouldn't matter if you are the CEO of an oil company or the CEO of a coal car company which sells itself as a solar car company...when you board the G650ER you'd get the automatic Z-rating which puts you at the very bottom enabling peers to shame and attack you.

Of course it will never happen because the elites love to protect their CO2 intensive lifestyle while pontificating the rest of us to drive electric and eat bugs.
There is the official rate, the black dollar rate, and also the Western Union rate, which is much higher than the official, but usually not as good as the black rate
I see where you're coming from but I disagree. your posts assumes that people who are good at leetcode (or more accurately, get good at leetcode by spending time on it) are not creative. but I'd like to point out that creativity isn't an intrinsic ability, but largely a skill. you get more creative the more you practice. innovation is not just about thinking differently for the sake of it, but more about the cross-pollination of ideas from different domains. that's what mathematicians do a lot of the time- see what unsolved puzzle can be re-shaped to be like a solved puzzle, and that's what a good computer scientist should be able to do with tech. i belive, at the same time, that leetcode is pretty fucking useless as a measure of ability and a way of learning new algos because. my opinion on the matter is that big tech like Google and fb suck because each manager has to justify their bullshit job by doing some bullshit change. there's no coherent vision anymore and the company has fragmented into a thousand teams, each run like a bad startup with infinite funding just until the boss gets a promotion or smth. and then the team does some other bullshit changes. apple has always had a very coherent product vision, and so this doesn't happen. i belive my conjecture is simpler and more plausible than saying that people who work hard aren't creative.
> Losing that ability to China/Taiwan was just a terrible strategic mistake.

More like losing that ability to Taiwan's TSMC and South Korea's Samsung. China's SMIC is very far behind and has insignificant market share. Additionally, it's rather insulting to non-communists when you mishmash together China and Taiwan.
Searching Bun's documentation (currently the long README on GitHub) for "macro", I only see a brief usage example as part of the build configuration, like:

[macros]
# Remap any import like this:
# import {graphql} from 'react-relay';
# To:
# import {graphql} from 'macro:bun-macro-relay';
react-relay = { "graphql" = "bun-macro-relay" }

..Or as a transpiler option:

const transpiler = new Bun.Transpiler({
loader: "tsx",
define: {
"process.env.NODE_ENV": JSON.stringify("development"),
user_undefined: "undefined",
},
platform: "bun",
macro: {
inline: {
whatDidIPass: `${import.meta.dir}/inline.macro.js`,
},
react: {
bacon: `${import.meta.dir}/macro-check.js`,
},
},
});

..But not within the transpiled code itself.

Ooh, hold on - there's more in /test/macro. Here's hello-fetch-macro.tsx.

import { fetchSync } from "macro:./fetchSync.tsx";

const synchronousFetch = fetchSync(`https://example.com`);

console.log(synchronousFetch);

Looks like the special import syntax converts the function to run at build time.

https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/blob/c3bf97002d6f0b117060dabf...
We inflate away our national debt anyway so in future dollars that is a few hundred billion at most.
You can't compare the Japanese as a people to, say, the typical American, who as a customer thinks the whole world is owed to him.

The Japanese are far less demanding, and understanding and forgiving of accidents like these.
From your profile "A web design, promotions, branding, and PR group based in Washington DC http://www.winternett.com"

I don't want crap on wikipedia, thanks.
> their employees are bookish, not innovative people

This is false. However, there is probably a misalignment between what the employees want to innovate on, and what Instagram users want.

My guess is that deep down it’s hard for a talented adult to truly give a fuck about Instagram.

So they do what they have to to keep themselves feeling like their work is meaningful. And that diverges from what consumers of tween influencer / fake-moment-creators think they want.
Looks purple to me, tested on:

- iPhone 13 Pro

- iPad Pro 2018 11"

- iPhone 8

- Both monitors on my Mac: MSI PS341WU and Dell P2715Q (both calibrated using DisplayCal and an Xrite ColorMunki)
A electric cars are mostly a luxury item for rich people to feel better. Not sure why you think Tesla should have a good rating.

They are harmful in that they are actively distracting from the proper solution: that people shouldn't have private cars.

The environmental cost to produce car, the space they take up in the cities, in the end private car ownership can not be made sustainable even if they run on electric. Tech wont solve the climate crisis, only societal change will.
[anonymous account]

No matter how many "users" Instagram has, TikTok is absolutely destroying Instagram in terms of minutes of user engagement. People are spending way, way more time on TikTok than Instagram and the trend is accelerating.

Meta is in full panic mode. They see the sand slipping through their fingers. They are trying to turn Instagram into TikTok because they think that is the only move. After all, it worked for them last time when they copied Stories and beat Snap.

But this time, not only is that strategy failing, but it is making their still enormous user base revolt.

Stories was a relatively useful extension to Instagram that didn't break the core app, so adding it worked. TikTok is a different thing and doesn't slot into Instagram as cleanly. Meta already tried making their TikTok clone a new "tab" in the app, but that didn't get the kind of results they needed. So now they are trying to make the whole app into TikTok because they don't know what else to do .

I'm not really sure where they go from here. Instagram isn't satisfied being Instagram - they need to lead the world in order to attract ad revenue. But they are losing ground quickly.

In the social media game, momentum is everything. TikTok has way more watch time so creators get more user engagement and can build their profiles much more quickly. Instagram is behind in engagement, so there is no incentive for creators to jump ship and get worse results. Instagram gets less fresh content which leads to less engagement and less ad sales. It's a vicious cycle that puts TikTok further ahead.
A solution to this is for courts to limit what is applicable in a ToS to a certain number of words, and have overly broad statements always favor the entity who has to agree.

This, in effect, nullifies all but the most important components of a Tos.
Im not saying they dont test, but not anywhere near to the same degree. You absolutely need to be able to solve some of these problems, but FB takes it to another level. Its almost not even comparable in terms of the rigor.
Could be faster still if it didn't calloc/free a "Fingerprint" buffer each time you add or query an entry. Since its individual BloomFilters are not thread-safe anyway, it could allocate the buffer once at BloomFilter creation time and be done with it.
From the Gizmodo article, some statements from TikTok:

> “There’s a lot of misinformation about TikTok right now. The reality is that the TikTok app isn’t even available in China."

Yes it is, it's just called Douyin there. It's got different content but due to the language barrier none of that would be interesting in western markets anyway.

> "We have not and will not share user data with the Chinese government, and would not do so if asked.” TikTok used this one in response to BuzzFeed News."

Right, A Chinese company standing up to the CCP. Good luck with that. Remember Jack Ma? I wonder if he does.

I agree this doc doesn't really prove they do associate with the CCP either. This is just spin doctor stuff, the stuff they want us to beieve. But it doesn't prove whether that's true or not.

But this is the thing, in China every company follows CCP rules. It's just how things work over there. Especially with social media companies because the CCP is really worried about citizens organising themselves. They take a lot of control over those.

I'm sure in the western world with "National Security Letters" things work the same way. But at least there is some kind of oversight and people speaking out. No I don't trust Facebook or Google any more than I trust TikTok and I minimise the use of services from either. But at least Facebook and Google are from a country I'm more morally aligned with.

PS: I don't even use TikTok because I know I will hate the service. I hate the whole 'funny videos' category and videos in general. I don't even use YouTube much. But I was considering buying a Pico 3 headset before.