skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Retrofits have not generally occurred. The person most personally responsible was given control of another one.
Not if you want to transfer value to the other side of the world..? (which admittedly is quite a niche use case)
API Gateway for Microservices
API Gateway written in Go that is not using any NGINX as a proxy (like Kong) with protect mode for unauthenticated APIs.

Kubernetes support is in the works.
blockchain? different solution.
Carbon has no intention of working on those systems, it’s designed for 64-bit first and foremost.
> I assume that expiry dates on US plates is related to either road tax or vehicle inspection

Usually yearly registration, though some US states do gate the registration completion on some forms of inspection.

California, for example, requires emissions testing every other year for cars older than a certain age, and won't send the new registration until that's been completed. But most states don't require any kind of regular safety or general road-worthiness inspections. I think that's kinda bonkers, but I haven't really looked at stats around how many car crashes are caused by a failure to maintain a car or its safety features. It's possible that the cost of doing such testing is often deemed too high, when considering the benefit.
Not exactly Clojure-related, but I wonder how acceptable is it for a programmer to suggest a technical decision by one’s own passion over company’s interest.

> The business case for Go is very strong now. Sh*t.

It sounded like a negative news for Suzi as she wanted to promote Clojure, but it’s positive for the company, as Go is a more suitable choice in this case. If a programmer is asked to make a technical decision, comes up if a solution based mostly on passion, isn’t it misleading?
I’ve seen a Haskeller claiming “this thing can be better expressed in a custom DSL” and started to write a parser, which in retrospect absolutely unnecessary, the passion was so strong that decisions got irrational. Shouldn’t a programmer be honest and say “this is not the best tool, but it’s my favorite, using it makes me happy”?
The C library we need has a few requirements that most people agree are difficult for Rust.

Working with any of the following is a nightmare:

- Memory arenas

- Intrusive data structures

- Buffer lifetimes with interesting lifetimes (typically because it maps to hardware)
Assuming he's right, what's the rational response?
If not, at what point will people actually start changing their behaviour? Because I see no real evidence of it so far.
The free-rider problem isn't necessarily the dead-knell for biological infrastructure.

Ants and bees build hives after all. Trees build, well, trees.

It's just that for biological systems, it's relatively easier to build legs than wheels. And as you suggest, wheels need more infrastructure to be really useful. So even if you could solve the free-rider problem completely (which you can't), it would still cost biological systems more.
Relevant comment:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31805570
I was surprised recently when upgrading from Catalina to Monterey and all the nix stuff just kept working. It was the first time a major macOS hasn’t broken nix.

Does anyone know if this update was a fluke?
Over the years I've heard people swear that microneedling helps regrow hair. If scalp tension really is a cause (doubt it is the only cause), perhaps the punctures created by microneedling alleviate the tension. For those who are losing hair due to other causes, microneedling wouldn't help and would lead those researching microneedling to get inconclusive results on effectiveness as the root cause wasn't accounted for.
This exploit would only work when CSM is enabled? Nowadays with SecureBoot I think it would have to be much more complex? (patching all functions in UEFI, bootloader and OS to bypass the verification).
Let There Be Light – Optics in Neural Recording, Part I
What's a universally discovered mechanism?
Most of the gas is used for industry, not heating. And even the industry seems to be able to lower the usage quite drastically. It’ll be tough for economy of course.

Also, everyone has just realized Russian army was all bluff. Every single country bordering with them will take advantage of this. Which means there will be multiple parties we can buy the formerly Russian gas from.
Come play biotech with us and let's figure out EVERYTHING and not just protein folding, yay! https://epicquest.bio
That fits in perfectly with what I was saying, I just wasn't precise enough.

The issue is that Node.js source code is not compiled to a target language like native code or bytecode. As such, there's no package repository from which you can retrieve compiled packages - you're forced to deal with the same build process as the developer of the package. If that weren't the case, the compiler pipeline that the post is complaining about would be eliminated for package users.

In fact, the author of this package could have avoided some of his pain by publishing a library with the compiled JS code, which would eliminate all the config of higher layers. But the JS ecosystem doesn't support making that distinction, there's no source package repo vs. compiled package repo (afaik - I don't use it more than I have to, because it all sucks.)
To expound, the binary utility fzf has a bash shell extension offering similar accelerations. It’s worth installing for the Ctrl-r and Ctrl-t macros.
I've had a foot in the "geo-engineering is just about our only hope" camp for a while. And there are absolutely no guarantees anything we try will actually a) work b) not cause even more harm than what we're trying to prevent.
Frankly, it's not even worth replying to this disingenuous goalpost-moving and "firehose of falsehoods" tactic. I've linked an informative resource above for anyone interested in factual debate on this topic.
I don’t really get the concern here. [[no_unique_address]] seems to be designed for use with empty types. As such, what does it mean to write to such a field? These are really meant to be tags, no?
The takeaway I got was that the M2 performance was better, but that it took disproportionately more power, so the efficiency was lower. It depends on what your criteria are.

It does sort of somewhat explain complaints about throttling with the M2 systems.

This article does have me reevaluating whether or not to get an M2 13-inch. There's other things to consider as well but it's an important one.
He's probably talking about Nest, Eero, AirPort (RIP), etc.
Ahh, you’re right—I missed the point they were making.
That's your problem.

If you have difficulty making friends then go to concerts or something.

I can't imagine any office culture worth the time I waste commuting.

For the record, I'm still friends with multiple co workers from previous jobs. But that's just not the point of work.
Or my homepage do I could get spammed by robots :)
There you go.

Not only crypto-skeptics can't be bothered to do basic research and even finish reading the entire PYMNTS article and click the 'Download report' link at the end of the article to see and verify the citations and methodology for themselves, instead they continue to pull out anecdotes, assumptions and at worse fallacies to deny reports like this one because 'all crypto bad', or 'all blockchain bad' nonsense. The decades of denial and ignorance from them is beyond pathetic.

What I am seeing here overall in this thread is a very extreme anti-crypto reaction, because the most vocal of all critics have lots books to sell them and they are certainly on a mission to totally stop all of crypto, blockchain and NFTs.

Good luck with that.
My sampling is diverse and big, in my bad opinion.

I'm in the US, born in New England, and have lived in five states throughout the Northeast, Texas, and the Northwest. I've spent a collective three years living in Germany, Switzerland, France (wife is from France). I have slept at least one night in every state in the continental US. I once hitchhiked across the US and back again, gabbing with every person I could find along the way. I lived in cities for about a collective decade, and in very, very rural settings (log cabin even) for a collective decade and a half. Lots of other stuff in between and on the sides. I communicate with diverse groups, in person and online, from right to left, nix to ms, fantasy to sci-fi, young to old. I'm a 'perspectivist', and am fascinated with the perspectives of others, especially those outside of my frame of comfort and reference. I try to push beyond 'convictions', to uncover 'opinions'; convictions are usually firmly rooted, while opinions often change. A person's background and influences are usually baked into their convictions, while opinions generally reflect where a person is in life, like the kind of music 'you're into right now'.

I was a line cook and an artist, working horrible minimum wage jobs for a decade, was homeless for a year (under a bridge homeless), started at community college, transferred to Harvard, graduated at the top, got prestigious fellowships, and now work in software development and live in a rural area that is within an hour of a big city. I still talk to everyone like they are my partner in life, I don't care what they look like or with which demographic they 'identify', or how long I have known them. I'm gabby - I talk to everyone - I make friends with everyone I meet, from the guy on the street to the gal at the grocery store, to the company leader.

Confession: I'm a thinker and writer in my free time. But I have tried to cast as wide a net in life, and have tried to engage people as people, for what I think is a long time.

My conclusion: we're being gamed. The people underneath are intact. Amazingly, when the game is lifted, the people emerge, largely unscathed, as testament to the endurance capability of our ancestral rodentia.

My sample and data have led me to hold this opinion rather strongly, for what it is worth, which is nothing.
Android/iOS, IPV4 shortage issues, technical hurdles, yeah the list abounds. Don't even need a phone, 10 dollar computers exist, it's mostly an accessibility issue, both of tech and IP.

The big reason to ditch the modern web entirely, though, is DNS - you pay a centralized thousands of dollars for rights to a name - if That's not centralization I don't know what is.

Truly decentralized means anyone hosts google.com, only difference is you pick which certs to trust. Probably by consulting your regional office/town hall, or similar.
Didn't some hacker boot camp try this a few years back? Customers paid by committing some fraction of their earnings for a decade or two.
But is it modern?
Live in the pod, eat the bugs, and use the bugs.
There's nothing wrong with it, but also I think it would be worth making it explicit that things are done the hard way. It's a bit like writing a programming on macos post with "so first we need to craft a xnu message by hand". For people arriving from search that's not a great impression.
"Just get your foot in the door and things will go from there."
I've heard such argument and it is optimistic and hopeful, but immigration status needs some basis to acquire. I wonder about perspectives of legally staying and working beyond 2 years of temporary protection (I believe tech firms don't employ undocumented engineers).
1000 square miles is a square 32 miles long or a circle 36 miles in diameter. The size of an average county in the US Midwest.

So if you’re that worried about it, find the least populated place in western Kansas or Nevada or Maine and build the biggest plant you can. Worst case scenario it turns into Chernobyl and you fence it off and call it a day.

Alternatively, we can keep using slave labor in China to build solar panels fabricated with toxic compounds obtained via strip mining that require natural gas and coal power plants to actually function on hot days.

Either you care about climate change or you just hate nuclear power. Discussions like these are great at revealing where folks stand on the issue when push comes to shove.
This hasn't been true in my experience. I've been running Nix on macOS for nearly a year without problems.
I guess it depend on the area, but (for me, in my area) published results are just a stating point.

When reading a paper the first question are: Does it even makes sense? (mostly yes, it depends on the journal) Is it overhyped? (definitively yes) Is it interesting after removing the overhype? (sometimes yes) Can we reproduce the result with our tools? (I hope so) Can we combine the result with our previous results? (I hope so) Is the combination interesting? (I hope so) Interesting enough to assign it to a graduate student, to drop whatever we are doing or something in between? (mostly something in between)

If we try to reproduce the result and fail miserably or if the methods are too unclear, we will jut forget about the paper and work in another topic. Perhaps contact the authors if we know them or the result very promising.

I think we never take a result at face value, except perhaps for the list of citations that appear in the introduction about recent related work.
I feel this frustration. I also live in the south and sometimes even the salads all have meat at restaurants.

What's funny is that there's also a fad of vegan restaurants that serve extremely fatty, highly processed "vegan junk food" for lack of a better description. They are greasy and lacking in protein.

This should be really simple. Minimally processed vegetables with tofu, tempeh, seitan, or lentils. But no restaurant here does it.
This fairly thorough analysis comes up with a higher estimate of around 300-500 [1]. Of course, deaths per unit of energy is not the only meaningful metric, and it ignores the environmental impact that you mention. But have you considered the environmental impact of using fossil fuels for energy?

1: https://ourworldindata.org/what-was-the-death-toll-from-cher...
To expand a little on this, here's Rich Hickey on the subject [0]:

> I dislike writing Java/C# as much as anyone, and Clojure is my ticket
to writing much less of it, while leveraging the efforts of
multitudes. As I've said in my talks, most Clojure users go from "eww,
Java libs" to "ooh, Java libs", leveraging the fact there there is
already a lib for almost anything they need to do. And using the lib
is completely transparent, idiomatic and wrapper free. OTOH, if they
want to customize their interface to a lib, it is trivial to do so in
Clojure.

> If, however, the stigma of Java extends to libraries written in it,
even when consumed from languages like JRuby and Clojure, and people
think it's cooler to reinvent than reuse, they need a new definition
of cool.

[0] https://groups.google.com/g/clojure/c/W_FTvyX6swY/m/UDhgIbkh...
U for a nuke mounted on a missile needs to be heavily enriched. On a semi trailer, not so much.
But on the plus side, North Korea already has them.
I have recently been working through last year's Advent of Code puzzles in Elixir. I finished the puzzles in 2020 and picked my old repo back up.

I recently had the pleasure of reusing some old code I wrote for a previous puzzle. I pulled the code out into its own module, added some docs, rethought some decisions, and got it working better. I learned how implementing protocols works and made it work with all the built in Enumerable functions. This is one of the first times in my life I looked at year-old code and thought "hey, this is actually useful!"

The project has been an awesome learning experience and entirely self directed. I pulled in a cool graph library for one puzzle in 2020. I wrote custom mix task for generating puzzle skeletons. It even downloads the puzzle input automatically now! I learned to use a benchmarking tool to satisfy some curiosity about differences between two different implementations. I've gotten way better at using recursion to solve problems. Today, I cloned the Elixir source code to get a better understanding of a particular language feature.

None of this stuff was necessary, and indeed it's not even technically useful - these puzzles are toy code, and I'm sure my implementations could be better. But I've just been enjoying the hell out of Elixir and going the extra mile doesn't feel like work, just more fun to be had.
Ok? Russia didn't sanction Ukraine; they invaded and have killed tens of thousands of people (so far). There's no equivalence here.
They are leaving sqlite.

In the upcoming FoundationDB 7.0 release, the B-tree storage engine will be replaced with a brand new Redwood engine.

https://apple.github.io/foundationdb/architecture.html#stora...
She did, but it takes at minimum an hour to write up and defend an academic integrity violation. And that's with no back-and-forth .

If more than a handful of people in the class cheat, you're spending most of your time on this than grading.

And it's extremely stressful. You can be absolutely sure that 90% of the class is cheating, and there's still a margin of error for each individual case. And there are subtleties. What if this student was helping someone, and the other student copied their work without permission?
Same for me on mobile chrome
hardwalled? you mean paywalled?
https://github.com/serverless-dns/serverless-dns/issues/79
This is my approach: running NixOS on macOS using UTM.
https://youtu.be/8gytY4ITSDA
How is this not indentured servitude 2.0?
I think this is true.

One thing plea bargaining does is make it cheap for muni's and counties to throw people in prison. But the money for prisons comes from State and Federal dollars.
Per your link they are leaving sqlite.

In the upcoming FoundationDB 7.0 release, the B-tree storage engine will be replaced with a brand new Redwood engine.
> it's more modern and flexible governance structure

You mean where Google has majority control over what does and does not go into the repo?
If you include depreciation? My 2019 Model 3 has barely lost any value.
Forgot to edit the Nextra meta tags.
I was in downtown Chicago today, taking my kids to the museum and zoo. The Lollapalooza music festival is happening, so the downtown streets were overflowing with young adults having a wonderful time.

If we can hold out a little longer, and the corporate landlords go bust, and some office buildings are auctioned off, and we can cheaply convert them to residential… It would be like a huge shot of adrenaline to America, making the cities affordable enough for young adults again. It would be good for America
I don't really get these flavor of article, the web is kind of the poster child of a decentralized application. saying the challenge of a decentralized web is kind of like saying the challenge of water not being wet enough.
Using any kind of centralized VPN service is dangerous, they're first to be put on ban lists. Best kind of VPN is tiny personal VPS. You can run simple unobfuscated wireguard and it'll work, nobody cares as long as it stays tiny.
Exploring the Granduc Road to the Salmon Glacier and Beyond (2018)
I suppose I would be the minority in saying "so what?"

A 5% year over year increase in dividends that are a Very Big Deal to institutional investors that likely make up a large majority of their shareholders and hold the stock BECAUSE of those dividends.

Meanwhile, capex is still ongoing and the reduce in spending could just as easily be seen as a bearish response to potentially poor new development plans. What if project costs were exceeding mid-term profit projections? Or potentially never going to be profitable? What if... ad infinitum.

Responsible stewardship of a company like Intel requires accounting for a great many variables that do not get conveyed directly to shareholders. That dynamic is why representatives are a thing. That is why there are boards of directors.

The fact that the government is handing them a subsidy, the fact that they cut some new development projects, and the fact that shareholder dividends saw a 5% increase can, and from my layman's perspective, probably are completely and totally unrelated, and questioning the validity of any one of those things due to the presence of the others goes into the territory of "need more info".
It's easier to publish a result that contradicts a previous result but is different, like we measures X=20 but the previous paper said that X=10.

Publishing a negative result is very difficult. I guess you need a long history of good publications to convince the journal you are not making a silly mistake.
Author of Million here -- Don't trust my benchmarks at face value! Always run your own benchmarks
htop is written in C: https://github.com/htop-dev/htop
I don't know if it should. Like this is neat and all but it's incredibly overcomplicated and for any readers unfamiliar with the tooling (which is most) it's off-putting.

If the audience was Nix users, then it would be different.

It's kinda like if you bought a fancy new camera and demonstrated your process but all your photos were out of focus, framed badly and lit poorly because you're into that for some reason. Would fellow fancy new camera enthusiasts cheer? Would folks who don't know about your fancy new camera think it's a good camera?
Today I used VPN to access cilium.io. I'm from Kazakhstan, though, and it seems to be blocked on US side, but who cares. Plenty of useful websites are victims of collateral damage where they're banned for sharing IP with other websites or they ban me for some weird reason.
It is easier to acquire such status once you are inside. Governments have a hard time getting people out than refusing their entry before they board from their destination. Doesn't mean it can't happen, but the odds are less likely.

This is really a comparison of what you have now in Russia vs. how it could be in the US. If the Russia government was about to make life bad for every Ukrainian inside the country, would you really ask this question.

The only thing that could make a US transition hard is your parents. Usually, what people do is they go first and then bring their parents/wife/etc... because nobody knows how it will turn out. I don't know if this is possible in your case, though.
> The final problem with the safe languages - with the exception of swift - is that they are all hell bent on not providing even just basic ABI stability. It doesn’t matter how “safe” your language is if the first thing you have to do is make a pure C (even losing potential for automatic lifetime management the C++ would allow) interface.

Carbon isn’t looking to do this either. The “solution” they’ve come up with is that you just recompile everything and get things on the same ABI, which is not surprising considering how Google operates internally.
What happens if the "shareholders" wish to wind you up?
> Safety and emissions inspections are improving our safety & air, and there’s data over time to show it.

I'm curious about this. Most US states do not require regular safety inspections, and some of those that do, only require them for a subset of vehicles (only commercial vehicles, only vehicles over a certain age, etc.). Around half of states require emissions testing, though often it's not yearly, and there are often exceptions for newer cars.

Certainly there are political and cost-related drivers to not requiring this sort of testing. But I do wonder what studies have been done, specifically for safety inspections: do they significantly reduce incidence of vehicle crashes, or at least of fatalities or serious injuries when crashes do happen?