skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> The sqlite library is tiny. Often smaller than some JSON parsers!

Stripped of all comments, the current "amalgamation" build of sqlite (which is the one most projects use) has 178k lines and 4.7MB of code. If your JSON parsers are anywhere near 1/10th of that size then they're seriously overengineered ;).
*loved
> I'm not a video professional

I am a video professional, and you always keep your originals. However, the part being left out of the conversation is that as a storage pool for editing goes, this isn't deep storage. Content is typically only left on the edit storage while the project is active. Even the TFA mentions he goes all the way to cloud cold storage.

Edit storage has always been expensive, and maintaining capacity was always a juggling act. Just because terms like NAS are being used, one should not think of this type of storage as a dump it and forget it type of storage.

There are many levels of professional. On the high end, the footage from the camera is copied to multiple hard drives on set. These are the backups, and us old timers still use the terms camera originals. These are as sacrosanct as film negatives, only there's magically multiple copies. This data gets transferred to the editor's storage. Once the edit is completed, the edit session and other content used in the edit may be transferred to the camera original drives for archival. On the other end of professional, you take the SD card out of the camera and transfer directly to the edit storage. In these situations, woe be unto thee that doesn't make proper backups. At that point, it's really more pro-sumer than professional, but hey, if they're getting paid, they're professional enough.
Excellent analysis! Thank you.
Looks like you've been filter bubbled.
Story background from 2018:

[https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-14/somerton-man-cold-cas...]

Taman Shud timeline, 1905-2010:

[https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-14/somerton-man-cold-cas...]

'An Empty Glass' wiki:

[https://anemptyglass.fandom.com/wiki/Anemptyglass_Wikia]
It isn't different, but it's also not a clear comparison. Some differences are based on binning and calibration for example. Take sensors, silicon, power systems etc. which are all imperfect. Some product variation exists on purpose, while others are mostly just as a side-effect from the production yields.

Some segmentation is a bit extreme (Windows Pro etc. can use gpedit but Windows non-Pro can't...), while others are a matter of paying for a service rather than a thing. (i.e. Terraform FOSS locally vs. Terraform Enterprise in the cloud - you actually get a different product with different capabilities, not the same product with different things 'cut off')

Perhaps Intel is a good example in the hardware realm; some chipset and ECC variations are choices that are purely made so that server usage is highly discouraged. I would guess that some of that is simply a side-effect of R&D cost: you can't really have consumers foot the bill for extreme R&D, but you also can't make better chips without a very costly R&D process. So they might have selected a segment they know they can squeeze and put the specific features only in products for that segment. (One could argue that another perspective might be 'server' CPUs subsidising 'consumer' CPUs)

It's not always as simple as 'fake barriers for no reason', but because sometimes it really is, it gets hard to distinguish with is really annoying.
Nobody had any use for number theory for some two and a half millenia or so, until we figured out that it can be used to secure communications and data.

How would you assess things like that?
I foresee a strange future in which a Blockchain ties itself to la share of Listerine royalties and ultimately becomes the king of Crypto currencies with the backing of a century+ old underlying asset.
It will be interesting to see how this goes. This is the first serious attempt to build a 3rd party in the social media age that I can think of, which will go a long way towards driving engagement and retention that didn't exist in the 90s. We're already getting non-stop campaigning nowadays so I could see that working out in Forward's favor.
Now do BP
>in the kernel that gets executed due to some syscall from grep

That won't be considered 'inner loop'
Basically once Zuck had kids it was over.
you can use any editor you like. could be vi, vim, nvim, emacs. the point is that your editor receives text from stdin, and writes changes to stdout, in the middle of a pipeline.

hopefully the examples in the readme make sense but maybe not?
I cannot imagine such a json parser. You can parse json in only hundreds of lines of code.
As many problems as Wikipedia has, and it surely has them, it's amazing how useful it remains despite those problems, and it's the only thing we have like it.

Stack Overflow is similar: you can make it look pretty bad case by case, yet it's an unchallenged best of breed despite its warts.

Maybe there's no perfect way to run these massive operations just like there is no clean, pretty answer to "should this article exist?" no matter where you set the bar.
Edge's default handling of third party cookies is the same as Chrome's.
SUSE doesn't even use KDE, they use GNOME... Sounds unlikely.
Linked elsewhere, the Wikipedia page is pretty good: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth,_fifth,_and_sixth_deriv...

The Wikipedia page on Jerk also has a good explanation for the how people feel that: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerk_(physics)

I'm unsure if we can really feel Snap and beyond.
Until Apple shows its cards it is the best available.

I think it is comparable to mobile phones in the 00's hardware/software wise.
The beginning of the end for R
I didn't make it up, but I did get the terms slightly wrong. It's "inclusionists" vs "deletionists" (not exclusionists).

There's literally a Wikipedia page about it (how notable is THAT): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deletionism_and_inclusionism_i...

It's a stupid debate to even be having. IMO only. Clearly I fall into the former camp.
Does this exempt Amazon as well? I heard from an ex Amazon employee saying that 50-60 hour work-weeks is the norm there, and they work you to the bone, but he also didn't specify if that was for his particular team/department only.

I'm guessing this is one of the exaggerated downsides, possibly coming from a skewed perspective of what is "normal" for a SWE if you spent your entire career in FAANG.

In any case, I'm still sure that working as a Amazon SWE would be light years farther ahead than working in a bottom of the barrel chop shop that pays less than half of market salary.

In other words, worst of the FAANG should still beat the best of the bottom-tier companies, especially if you're taking home much more money in the end.
Good pay good learning. Plenty of downsides I won’t bother listing, but only for elite eng in those companies, or creative people.
I thought that was called "jerk".
A friend of mine is working on a 20 years old Microservices application. It is literally the worst piece of garbage system I have ever heard about. I am sure my friend would have loved for it to be a monolith instead of 50+ services with massively complicated distributed dependencies and timing issues.
Your position is incredibly simplistic - and your response has nothing to do with my comment. That the environment underlies civilisation is a simple fact. Degraded environment, no food. No food, no people. No people, no military.

But the invasion of Ukraine most likely has a lot to do with Russia gaining control over the supply of fossil fuels to Europe and the world. So even at a very high level, the things you say are far from cut and dried. Had Europe moved more resolutely towards energy independence then things might have been different.

Military security is only one kind of security. Military spending is only one way to create security. Most of the wars of the last 100 years have been about energy. And I suspect that most militaries exist primarily to perpetuate themselves.
"How do you create a Python package? How do you set up automated testing and code coverage? How do you publish the package? That's what this article teaches you." — delivered as promised!
Lots of good ideas here but writing your own date picker — both suggested and pictured — is just a silly idea. As a front end dev you are in the business of making products, not managing leap years.
I've met people who loved Windows 8. Different strokes.
There are quite a few uses for cookies besides tracking users across sites. Sometimes there are other ways to do it, but those ways are often significantly more complicated.
I sourced an article from 5-6 major news sources and it was nominated for deletion within hours. It ultimately survived appeals but why the hell did I have to waste my time on that.
Whew boy this doesn’t sound like human rights violations in the making, no siree
Yeah but if they weren’t in poverty they probably wouldn’t join up. But definitely related issues.
For shared hosting (IDK what wikienigma uses), pretty much yes? People offering them are such cheapskates (and fans of dodgy "security" solutions). I remember that one of the hosting providers that I used simply cut out many countries that have good reputation (think Western Europe). I would advise anybody to steer out of shared hosting, any VPS would do much better for not much more money.
Another ADE 651? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADE_651
"But the simple fact that it runs locally makes it a poor technical fit in many scenarios"

MySQL and PostgreSQL can run locally too. I assume you mean that SQLite doesn't provide a network server interface out of the box?
interesting, original url was:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/secret-briefing-zeroes-in-...

does HN auto convert that to thedailybeast.com somehow?
This isn't just partisan "sides." It's also sides of specific legal questions.

I don't think "just stop picking a side regarding abortion, gun ownership, or gay marriage" is a reasonable solution. These are political wedge issues, but they are also legal questions with answers that can affect your daily life. Of course you want it to go a certain way!
Uh, the carbon content of fuels winds up as CO2 emissions, which are blamed for climate change. Taxing the carbon content of fuels is a very targeted, direct tax. It's simple, too, orders of magnitude simpler than any other proposed method.
I agree that finding the origin of a virus that's less deadly and faster-spreading (like SARS-CoV-2) is a harder problem. Nevertheless:

1. We quickly found pretty good evidence (infected civet cats and raccoon dogs, and infected human traders of those animals) that SARS-1 arose from natural zoonosis, within about a year of its emergence in humans. The later discovery of WIV-1 didn't add to this evidence.

2. We've found no such evidence for SARS-CoV-2.

That doesn't mean SARS-CoV-2 definitely arose unnaturally--we've expended a lot more effort looking, but it really is a harder problem. It just means we don't know, and we need to keep looking. Do you disagree?
Google Analytics isn't a street-legal car.
To add to this, jerk is super relevant to self driving cars. While the car itself can handle sudden changes in acceleration, the humans inside often cannot. Self driving systems must account for jerk in their algorithms.

It's also super relevant to roller coaster design.
> Google don't know how those users interact with firefox search settings though, and without that they don't know how much it is worth to pay for being the default search.

Why not pay roughly in proportion to the revenue you get from Firefox users searching?
Original url was:

https://www.hastingstribune.com/ap/personal_finance/debris-f...

why did this get changed to just https://tribunecontentagency.com/ ?
If you don’t have the skills to implement a well structured and easy to maintain monolith then you most definitely don’t have the skills to implement a distributed more complex implementation of the same system.
Or run untargeted ads. Those are still a thing.
If the goal is to reduce CO2, then the source of the fuel is irrelevant. The only relevant thing is the carbon content, which gets turned into CO2 via combustion.
I’m guessing the parent was referencing Aaron Swartz: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz
None of the other browsers have implemented anything like ITP's 7-day window, though.
Source article made assertions that saber-rattling drove divergence between Linux desktops, as opposed to the popular narrative of divergence we've heard-- and offers no evidence, but only nebulous assertions.

Someone key that was there says "uh, no."

Yes, adding infinite context would make it a little easier to read, but it stands on its own.
The party, which is centrist, has no specific policies yet. It will say at its Thursday launch: "How will we solve the big issues facing America? Not Left. Not Right. Forward."

Well... they have a catchy but ultimately meaningless slogan. It's no "Make America Great Again" but it'll fit on a bumper sticker.

Unfortunately for them, "centrism" is an often morally bankrupt and intellectually lazy philosophy based on the premise that a correct solution always lies between two opposing, equally invalid ideologies. But the center-point between ideologies (assuming such a thing always exists) more often than not simply serves the interests of the status quo and its injustice.

The centrist view of racial equality gets us Jim Crow laws. The centrist view of LGBTQ rights stops at "civil unions" but not actual marriage. The centrist view of science "teaches the controversy" of creationism. The centrist view of Hitler seeks peace in our time. Sometimes there is no valid middle ground and compromise is giving in to evil. You're not going to get anywhere with the black community, or womens' rights, or climate change or immigration or any issue Americans actually care about with centrism. Sometimes, you have to pick a side and make a choice.

The US doesn't need another party committed to never actually taking a strong stance on any issue, it already has the Democratic Party. But I guess it'll be fun watching these folks siphon votes away from the left and win Trump a second term.

Damn I hate US politics sometimes.
This rant sounds like an informercial full of fake problems nobody has.

I have used Linux for decades and have never experienced any of this.

1. Use the software packaged for your distro. Want to update? then update. It just works.

2. Use the packaged nvidia drivers for your distro. Want to update? then update. It just works.

3. Prefer a laptop that is compatible with Linux, if that's not possible, use a laptop-friendly distro.

4. 99.99999% of people will never ever try to do that probably that's why.

5. Most of them are key/value based despite the syntax.

6. Yet most distros inherit from a major base distro like Redhat, Debian or others. If you want to use Slackware or Gentoo then that's your own choice.

7. There are many distros but, many of them are Debian or Redhat based, the ones that aren't are used by a tiny percentage of users.

8. And Pipewire solves this, and is the default sound server on recent distros.
I've felt the pain of everything you're experiencing. I've managed storage pools with 48 individual drives of spinning rust. Originally, for the lulz, we striped all 48 as RAID0 just to see the speeds essentially saturating the bus. We then reconfigured to 4 arrays with 16 drives each into RAID6, then striped those into RAID60. We started playing with removing a few drives from each array as hot spares.

At one point when I was younger, that was all fun. Now, I just want it to work so I can go back to having a life and let others do all the experimental stuff. But now I get to live vicariously through people like you posting their results. Good stuff!
> the point is that spending on social programs is much cheaper than national security programs and makes a more meaningful difference in more peoples lives

That's not the point presented by the OP. If he was to advance such a point, he'll have to cite a research that shows that investing in poorer families will lead to semi-conductor advancement in the country.

Unless you think the US (or any reasonably advanced big economy) doesn't need a competitive semi-conductor industry.
Could you explain what you are doing?

JavaScript is single threaded so I cannot see how you can implement actual concurrency control.

I implemented multiversion concurrency control in Java but I am yet to include the algorithm from the whitepaper Serializable Snapshot Isolation.

https://github.com/samsquire/multiversion-concurrency-contro...
I agree here, and I think a good way to think of it is not as government handouts but government incentives. $x for chips in USA incentivizes industry to move to USA which creates jobs and reduces a dependency on external companies. $y for feeding poor school children incentivizes what exactly?
I don’t know if you will need microservices or not. I can tell you that many developers and teams will do microservices poorly and will not get an advantage out of it and will have an even more complex ball of mud to maintain.
There is a reason TikTok got popular and RSS died. People really like their endless semirandom entertainment
I like to use yadm too! it's basically just git a few niceties like encryption
no, I mean the core KDE developer community acted like they were flush with money, users, etc.
Well, the reason KDE 4.0 was to buggy was exactly "because" KDE had contributors. Porting from Qt3 to Qt4 was a lot of work. Some volunteers completed that much much earlier than others but had to wait for others parts of the project to ship. More complex parts weren't ready yet, and as such, some contributors were losing interest. So KDE had to ship it at some point to make sure the train keeps moving.

It was a combination of the massive, massive hype train that was generated by KDE + distro's not listening to KDE's ask for 4.0 and earlier versions not being shipped that caused a massive backlash. KDE learned from the mistakes and the 4 to 5 transition and 5 to 6 transition which is in the works now are both avoiding those mistakes. But KDE did fix those bugs. Within a few releases, KDE 4 was quite usable and stable, but the damage was done.

In my opinion KDE hasn't really recovered the bad image caused by that despite the fact that its in a much better position now.
This is a very very annoying thing in new cars.
Its almost impossible to shut this down, and I've heard that if you manually remove the Sim card from the car, the media system will go crazy.

I personally say cars should be designed as a dock for your phone, their hardware gets old fast, and you don't replace your cars because the software is slow, but you do replace your phone for that reason.
And its much cheaper to replace a phone than a car.

I think this is where the industry is going, especially after the announcement of Apple carplay full screen.

The thing is, do we really to give bigtech even more control over our gadgets?, But the other choice is what What we have now, and its not better, its a lose lose situation, where in both you won't own your car or have full privacy.

Also I doubt even if bigtech took over the media counsle that manufacturers will stop tracking.

Its an issue caused by everything being an uncontrollable blackbox.
Why do all these no-code platforms seem like scams?
Almost 100% of this post is completely wrong.

Don't use 3rd party libraries: NIH syndrome is plaguing our industry like a disease already. Can't wait until companies realize they need half the devs they do now. Our industry needs a wake up call, especially for immature developers who waste company money

Forms don’t have to suck: Just use hook form, or use uncontrolled forms. Or better yet if you have a simple form don't use a frontend library at all.

Any component that expects a state has a hook: Please God no. Write code. When you write it 3 times abstract it.

CSS: Use styled components: No

Components: No, use flat file structure. Don't use the whole Folder/index mess. It's a nightmare. Just do Button.tsx, UserFeed.txt / etc. Put components next to feature unless they're generic. Just use tailwind.

Split the routes using loadable components or the equivalent in Next: Ok.

Folder Structures: No

Decoupling logic from components: 100% never do this. Ever.

Native like Page Transition: No. Don't use animations for page transitions on web or PWA's. Those are reserved for actual native apps.

Context’s: Don't use Context, unless it's literally for if the user is logged in. Everything else should use some kind of 3rd party library (Mobx, Redux, Recoil, Zustand) that uses subscriptions to circumvent React's extremely slow and outdated way of rendering. Alternative: Use react-query for most date fetching / global state.
Numerical sludge. Got it.

Enjoy your criticism.
If you spend enough time in the hacking/privacy sphere you’ll hear about gag orders that have been (allegedly) been placed on major tech companies that prevent them from disclosing major backdoors or taps that 3 letter agencies have put in place.

Plus all of the fiber backbones are tapped anyways.
Genesis Revisited: A Scientific Creation Story
To make things clear: Getting rid of 3rd party cookies will benefit Google.

Google is building alternative mechanisms that they can use to do similar advertising (the Privacy Sandbox[1]). This may or may not be better than 3rd party cookies (it's nuanced). It's undoubtedly better for Google - they are the ones who are doing most of the work on this, and so their tech will work the best when the transition occurs. Many (most?) AdTech networks will fall even further behind Google's network, giving Google a competitive advantage.

We saw the same thing with GDPR - Facebook and Google were the most involved in the design process and had the biggest budget and were the best prepared when it rolled out. They already had transitioned to GDPR-compliant storage etc, so didn't lose any targeting ability, whereas other companies did, and newcomers had bigger barriers to entry.

[1] https://privacysandbox.com/intl/en_us/open-web/#proposals-fo...
when the title says "former republicans and democrats" they mean a democrat whose only experience is a failed run for the primaries and a former republican governor.

I wish them well, but I highly doubt this will be any different than the other 3rd parties.
Fonts, vector graphics, interpolation for animation and video games
Don’t “study” it. Build something.
Why so little love for the patent grant in the MIT License? (2018)
You’re comments regularly attack other users, it’s not okay, please stop.
Makes sense they’d think he was a foreigner, since nobody in Australia declared him missing.
That's cool man apologize for what is for you to apologize, and nothing else. Nothing else. And do your thing in the semblance of your vision of your ideas, all the way and show the world. And the world won't like it.

You gotta be sure of what you know. Be sure and be wrong, better than always being unsure.
I have a happy feeling and it passes. Would be good to know how to hold on to it.
> I'm as confused as you are.

Don't be, for the last decade or so money has been extremely cheap.

For anyone focused on fundamentals many of these companies don't make sense and it all seems eerily similar to the dotcom logic (anyone old enough will remember claims of "new economy" and "things are different"), but for anyone interested in growing their money, spending more than you make while money is essentially free makes a lot of sense.

The thing many people still don't understand is that the era of cheap/free money is coming to an end and there is going to be a lot of reality coming to surprise companies that aren't actually able to become profitable in an era without free money.

This doesn't just impact companies that currently don't make a profit, but those that make their profits from other companies that don't make a profit. How much AWS is paid for by startups that don't make a profit? How much of meta's ad revenue is ad-spend from companies that don't make a profit?

We'll soon be finding out.
It's a meme https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/instructions-unclear