skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Clinton never said “black” super predators.

> "But we also have to have an organized effort against gangs," Hillary Clinton said in a C-SPAN video clip. "Just as in a previous generation we had an organized effort against the mob. We need to take these people on. They are often connected to big drug cartels, they are not just gangs of kids anymore. They are often the kinds of kids that are called superpredators — no conscience, no empathy.
Banning media is a thing repressive dicatators do.
Ford is: https://www.businessinsider.com/ford-exec-gps-2014-1 (Ford Exec: 'We Know Everyone Who Breaks The Law' Thanks To Our GPS In Your Car)
Ah yes, it’s a sinister plot by the evil “environmental lobby”…

No, it’s just that the roots of the green movement are mixed with the nuclear disarmament movement, and the rejection of nuclear unfortunately got carried on to civilian power plants :(
Feel free to answer any of my questions, none of them were rhetorical.

Many people are eager to make their opinions the de facto law of the land. In reality they have rarely done any searching outside of their emotions.

They same people then cling to statutory protection when their ignorance is displayed
A solid quality test for good articles: are authors honest about the limitations?
When I had my iPhone battery changed, they explicitly said it should be unlocked and / or I should give them the code. So I went through the trouble of backing everything up, wiping the phone clean, and then reinstalling everything when I got it back.

If there was some kind of "status debug port" or whatever, the technicians could've done the various checks the sibling talks about without needing full control of my phone.
Those roots could also be called reasonable.

Do we cure reasonable?
Not even close to even 5 years of fossil fuel usage in a car.
re: productivity, you may appreciate this quote from John Muir:

> I am losing precious days. I am degenerating into a machine for making money. I am learning nothing in this trivial world of men. I must break away and get out into the mountains to learn the news
D and I think Fortran can also do this
> Outside of very few, select circumstances, violence isn't the answer inside of a household.

Sure, but we're teaching kids lessons for when they're adults, right? Is it really a good idea to raise a generation who will not act out of self-defense?

> Even if two boys are fighting it out, I'm not sure if the right answer is to kick their ass and spank them / humiliate them over it.

I don't think violence is an answer for that.

> People used to beat their kids up over bad grades or missing homework assignments. That's too much violence for sure.

That's way overboard, and not what I had in mind. Rewards and punishments with kids is complex, and I don't want to come off like I am trivialising it all.

Humans (and chimps, and dogs) have all been studied in-depth, and at this point we know for certain that the idea of fairness is not a uniquely human one.

Take for example this very common scenario: an older/stronger child slapping a younger/weaker sibling.

The victim in this case is likely not going to believe that any non-physical punishment is fair(In fact, it isn't fair), and all it would do is breed some resentment.

If it happens just once or twice, sure, the victim can move on. If it happens all the time and the only result is that the parents take away TV for the aggressor for a few days, then that's going to result in plenty of long-term resentment.

Even worse, sometimes if the victim responds, they're going to get punished as well because some parents don't usually care to adjudicate.

Schools are even worse - the victim is more of a legal liability to the school than the aggressor, hence schools are more likely to pretend it never happened, or to punish both parties equally.

Taking all this into account, I tell my boys that they should never hit first, and that if anyone ever hits them the only appropriate response to to hit back.

They've[1] never hit anyone thus far, but they are also not afraid to hit anyone who hits them, because that's only fair.

[1] The younger one is only 3, so not yet a proper data point.
mega droughts, record heat waves, wildfires, more numerous and violent storms of all kind but sure there is no problem with the climate. shaping the climate doesn’t happen overnight and if no action is taken now the world will be very different in 50-100 years. just because dinosaurs lived on a hotter earth doesn’t mean than 10 billion people can comfort at do so too ...
You are seeing hate, as a reflection of your own emotional response to the act. You are also insisting that those responsible, must believe just as you do, and therefore presuming they think their act wrong.

If you cannot see how they view they world, how their thinking is wrong, cannot see how they think, you have zero chance of correcting it.
Looks maybe like the opposite, there's way too much smoothing. I don't mind pixel perfect fonts or even aliased text but these just look like an aggressive blur was applied to everything
What got shown was that ignoring bad behavior does not make it go away. I do not see any effort towards rehabilitation or education in SFO, just no prosecution.
It’s also bs. The promise is only as good as the maker and the technology. Has it been vetted? Are there independent evaluations? Is Samsung willing accept any liabilities in the event of failure?

All hype, no substance. Delete your data (with no way of verifying) and restore it on return.
Eero is set up so that Amazon can snoop your local network, and/or use it to create a shadow network to defeat IoT air gaps. I assume they do, or at least will eventually.

Look at how they've been behaving over time with Nest.
Completely false, if this were the case we wouldn't be in such trouble. Long duration electricity storage at a large scale and affordable price point is an unsolved problem, it's the holy grail of the renewable energy puzzle.

Transportation of electricity over thousands of kilometers and through oceans is very hard as well. Routine with natural gas.

Maybe best if you get the basics straight before jumping into the discussion.
Thanks for an interesting read!

Now, time for a thought experiment. Imagine Tor was instead developed by Russian researchers working for Russian ministry of defense at the time. Would you use it to visit rt.com blocked in your country?
Most of the time when I see a headline of the form "X is shutting down", X is something I've never even heard of.
That was a fun rabbit hole! Thank you!
It was Bush - if it hadn’t been spent on Iraq it would have gone straight to tax cuts for the upper brackets.

We’re talking about the guy who managed to tank the worlds healthiest budget
The only reason you're not hearing about the acid rain or the ozone hole anymore are because decisive international action was taken to stop both, and wouldn't you know it, it worked.
And, are you really "old enough to remember" a single politician mis-stating a climate forecast during a speech, or are you just "old enough to remember" seeing it repackaged into a meme on social media a decade or so after the fact? Either way, it is an asinine basis for your leading claim.
This is wishful thinking. France for example never had a Three mile island type of disaster which tilted the public opinion of nuclear power, like the USA did. They continued building up their nuclear power plants well into the 1990s but failed to bring construction costs and delays down like your comment suggests.

In fact if we take Germany as a counter-example, when they stopped building nuclear power plants due to popular demand, they significantly increased renewable energy to a point where they are currently replacing coal power at a greater rate then France, despite Germany actively shutting down nuclear plants that still had years of life left.

This shows that Nuclear power might actually be a hindrance towards an electrified future, as governments have historically put to much faith in it, which was ultimately unwarranted, instead of investing in renewables.

EDIT: I feel like people are focusing on the wrong point here. I was apparently—and unintentionally—disingenuous by touting Germany’s success in replacing coal power with renewables, as compared to France. However, my main point still stands, that investing in nuclear well into the 1990s did not bring costs and delays of new plants down.
I can't help but think of this other article -- only loosely related

How Inuit Parents Teach Kids To Control Their Anger

https://www.kqed.org/mindshift/53283/how-inuit-parents-teach...

however I don't know how this translates to the whole of society vs a small community
> With nuclear, the hidden cost is both long-term storage of waste and the cost of nuclear accidents.

Long term storage is actually trivial, just requires actually storing it.

Counterintuitively, best way is glassing it and dumping it on the abyssal plane in the sea.

This controls the temperature and acts as a radiation shield and there's more a hundred times more life on the surface than in the abyss. Also, no humans who get prissy about 1 in 100 chances of cancer than animals don't fare about. The ocean's also big enough that a your case corroding and some material being dissolved and spreading in the water is irrelevant (unless all your nuclear waste you ever dump manages to escape and spread throughout the ocean rather than just sit in a sullen pile you'll be under EPA limits).
I'm a native English speaker, and it's confusing for me sometimes, too. I've had to ask multiple times whether someone was expecting an answer from me when they used this construct.
Same reason people are afraid of getting robbed at night when they're more common during the day when everyone is at work, or why we're scared of heights and planes, but cars and horseback riding don't phase us. Fear is an emotional reaction, not a rational one.
I get the impression this guy just wanted something to blog about.
In my free country media has to obey rules. There are rules for porn, ads, defamation, bad language. Not sure where youa re from that media can has no rules and they can publish anything without any consequences.
That's both odd and interesting, my only experience with official repair services was that they always were starting ANY job by wiping the entire device. That was always written in bold letters that's what I have to agree for. Their answer on why it is required was always that's the only way to test the phone is fully functional as from factory with default config. Thus... I started fixing them on my own.
C++ also pays a price for insisting not only that objects have addresses, but those addresses are distinct.

If you've got a 1.6 billion empty tuples in variable A, 1.4 billion in variable B and 1.8 billion in variable C, C++ can't see a way to do that on a 32-bit operating system. It needs to give each empty tuple an address, so it must think of 4.8 billion integers between 0 and 2^32 and it can't do that, so your program won't work.

Carbon is still far from finished, but if objects needn't have addresses it can do the same as Rust here, and cheerfully handle A, B and C as merely counters, counting 1.6 billion, 1.4 billion and 1.8 billion respectively is fine. Empty tuples are indistinguishable, so I needn't worry about giving you back the "wrong" empty tuple when you remove one, I can just give you a fresh one each time and decrement the counter.
So you're implying that Telegram is essentially Kremlin's project. Any other reasons you believe this is the case?
Comdb2: distributed sqlite: http://comdb2.org/
Because to them, what they want "normal psychology" to be is a docile, obedient, bootlicking sheep.
Sorry, not in the ecosystem (clearly).

Why not? Just curious.
It’s very unfortunate! I don’t really know of a good solution other than stronger and more collaborative leadership preventing these “us vs them” silos. In effect the developers should be considered the customers of the devops team therefore they should be doing everything they can to aid the developers. Or, just have them in the sane team.

Yes definitely you can use it, credit would be nice though if the expression becomes well known ha ;)
This makes me think the navy now has something better, so they're loosening the reigns on last-gen nuclear technology.
Show HN: Clang_format_all – Configure clang-format with YAML
I use clang-format for a lot of my projects, but there were certain things that I wished clang-format did. Like ignore certain directories and a more explicit way of just checking the files without modifying them. This script is basically a wrapper for clang-format that adds those options via YAML configuration file. I find it quite useful for some projects of mine(especially when I want to ignore some directories). Hopefully some people find it useful as well.
ask this in bogleheads.org instead.
Yes, that’s why I said attributed to, rather than “Voltaire said”. A quick search seems to point to various economists and commentators in the 18th century.
It seems unlikely to me that efforts to build web frameworks are causing a decrease in time spent building wrapper libraries. Developer time (particularly, open-source developer time) isn't a homogeneous commodity; people tend to work on things that they personally need. Anecdotally I can say that if I were to cease development of my own Clojure web framework, I would not immediately start writing a Syslog library instead :).
Another option would be to create the virtual table used for the table-valued function using a schema to define the columns:

CREATE VIRTUAL TABLE students_json_read USING lines_json_read(schema="students-schema.json);

Then, that one table could be used for multiple files:

SELECT * FROM students_json_read('school1-students.json');
SELECT * FROM students_json_read('school2-students.json');
All of the used fuel ever produced by the commercial nuclear industry since the late 1950s would cover a whole football field to a height of approximately 10 yards

Solar and Wind require a backup for when there's no wind or it's cloudy. Their current default backup is burning fossil fuels.

Of those, coal plans are particularly salient because they do generate radioactive waste. Continuously. And pour it over the atmosphere. They contribute far more radiation to the environment than nuclear power stations.

> let future generations worry about it.

I think they will appreciate having to worry about that in exchange of not having to deal with not existing because of climate change.
My libertarian knee jerk reaction was “fuck that”. But then again, it can’t possibly be worse than PG&E so... sure why not.
Well, Apple was a little clever with Carbon for this reason, because it was a C based API. I'm not sure how you get Carbon from C++.
The reason I am bringing this question to HN, is that this community has had to deal with hard financial shifts more than most industries and might have experienced such....

I am livid, but about to puke on the malfeasance from their handling of this account.

THERE IS NO FUCKING way you can invest into a college fund, $40K and it hasint even doubled in size in 17 years.
No offence, and with all due respect, but... although I've never said this or heard it said in a meeting, I've sure as hell felt it. Don't you get just bored surrounded by the same type of human?
yes, but it's easier to intercept them if they're launched from further away
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9pCUIAheux4

4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42
Measuring the Universe with Star-Shattering Explosions
At least on my phone (Samsung), the "self-test" app is on the /system partition, which is where the user OS is, and you need to boot normally to use it. You can run it by entering *#0*# in the dialer, no need to flash anything.

Having a dedicated test image (like /recovery) is a possibility, but it wouldn't be the same environment as the user. The kernel may be different, maybe some runtime calibration data would be missing, and most customers want to see their phone working after a repair.
I submit this because I see no substantive difference between this, and book or teaching bans (such as the widely publicized CRT bans and don't say gay bills). Both seek to censor a topic. Yet this provokes hardly any outrage, or even attention. Why?
Military reactors run on very highly enriched fuel, nearly weapons grade. That dramatically increases proliferation concerns when you're talking about large fleets of civilian reactors.

I'm rooting for NuScale, but so far every attempt at realizing the SMR dream has failed, so I'd caution people about thinking this is a pure slam dunk and it's just some sort of mass stupidity keeping the technology back.
exactly, especially when you read wikipedia's article on energy density:

material specific energy w*h/kg
----------- ----------------------
uranium 22,394,000,000
...
diesel fuel 12,666
You're saying that nuclear testing produces a lot of radioactive fallout? Yeah, it does. This is absolutely not the same thing as operating a nuclear reactor.
You do know that you can exchange money for “actual real stuff”, including natural resources and land? So that why we cite costs in “money”.
I can’t read the article without signing up.
Don't tell anyone ever, until you set everything up. Also move as soon as possible.
It's a bit early in its lifecycle to get too excited for features which already exist in other languages. Carbon is exciting because of C++ interoperability, but I already get this behavior today in Ada.

type Point is record
x, y, z : Interfaces.Integer_64;
end record;

procedure Print(p : Point);

Is `p` passed by reference or value? The compiler chooses what it thinks is best--all parameters are considered `const` unless they're `out` parameters. There's some rules for classes (tagged types), uncopyable (limited) objects, and `aliased` parameters which are always passed by reference.

I can't get a pointer type (access) out of the parameter to the function, since the accessibility rules prevent it:

-- "constant" since we don't know if it is writable
type Point_Access is access constant Point;

Last_Printed : Point_Access := null;

procedure Print(P : Point) is
begin
-- P'Access is sort of like C++ std::addressof(P) to get a "pointer"
-- There's also P'Address to get the actual address, but then requires conversion to a pointer-like "access" type to be used.
--
-- Compiler Error: "non-local pointer cannot point to local object" since Point_Access type is declared at a higher level
Last_Printed := P'Access;

-- If we really, really, want to do it, "I'm smarter than the compiler", you can force it...
-- Think of "Unrestricted" and "Unchecked" as grep-able warnings signs of "this is potentially very dangerous"
Last_Access := P'Unrestricted_Access;

-- ...
end Last_Printed;

What about making and then trying to use a local pointer-like type? This doesn't work because you can only create pointer-like accesses to types which have been marked as `aliased`, since you don't know if there's a location you can point to which has the value.

procedure Print (P : Point) is
type Local_Access is access constant Point;

-- Compiler Error: prefix of "Access" attribute must be aliased
Ptr_Like : Local_Access := P'Access;

-- Similar, "I am smarter than compiler" trick works here too...
Ptr_Like : Local_Access := P'Unrestricted_Access;

You can allow passing any arbitrary pointer into a function by providing `access`, but you're not allowed to store it, since you don't know which flavor of the pointer type it could be, e.g. if it points to something on the stack, or on the heap:

type Point_Access is access constant Point;
Last_Printed : Point_Access := null;

-- Allow printing any pointer-like (access) to a point.
procedure Print (P : access constant Point) is
begin
-- Compile Error: implicit conversion of anonymous access parameter not allowed
Last_Printed := P;

-- If we really, really want to do this, we can force it with a cast...
Last_Printed := Point_Access (P);
-- ...
end Print;
I saw some videos of this on TikTok, and I still can’t decide if it is awesome or horrifying.
So, for example, if russia became more friendly and cooparetive with eg. Cuba, that wouldn't be problematic to USA, because proximity doesn't matter that much?
> How do we discipline without punishing? How can we discipline our kids but avoid making them feel bad?

It's not clear what those questions mean.

discipline verb
disciplined; disciplining
transitive verb
1 : to punish or penalize for the sake of enforcing obedience and perfecting moral character
Rogers practiced effective communication for children, which I believe is worthwhile studying as an adult. Helps with clarity.

Starts with:

1. State the idea you wish to express as clearly as possible, and in terms preschoolers can understand. Example: "It is dangerous to play in the street."

2. Rephrase in a positive manner, as in "It is good to play where it is safe."

3. Rephrase the idea, bearing in mind that preschoolers cannot yet make subtle distinctions and need to be redirected to authorities they trust. As in, “Ask your parents where it is safe to play.”

Ends with:

... 9. => "Your favorite grown-ups can tell you where it is safe to play. It is important to try to listen to them, and listening is an important part of growing."

Remainder of rules available at https://www.openculture.com/2019/05/mr-rogers-nine-rules-for...
Everything you do in this world "enroaches on others" to some extent. One of the core tenets of freedom, at least in the West, is that we need to allow a certain amount of that and consider the fact that people will not always do what you want as a necessary condition for freedom to exist.
I'm happy I returned my on-order Pixel 6 when the 6a came out... the 6a is the smallest in their lineup and it's still a little bigger than my preference.

I've been rocking an iPhone 7 since it came out - I want a true one-handed, pocketable phone - but nobody tests software on them anymore and things are glitching hard. Plus, battery life is half a day now.
I believe it! But I was talking about my philosophy research, in value theory and art history. I don't see the irony.
do you know what they invested this in?

maybe they did 10% stocks and 90% bonds or something. (And charged you a 1-2% fee eating major part of the gains)

We'll need some more info to know what they did wrong.
Maybe the right question to ask is, why you have 4.8 billion empty tuples? And why you're still on a 32-bit system?
Yes, and it was a colossal waste of money keeping them running even that long. Realistically they should have been scrapped in the period after the Korean war.
Not sure if this is a pro-tip that could be repeated or not, but I've had a plot for five years. When I signed up they contacted me and told me about the extensive waiting list, and offered to tear up my check if I didn't want to wait. "But it's a cashier's check," I replied. I think they bumped me up in the queue just to avoid the hassle of returning it, because I was immediately approved.

(Edit: Just to be clear I think the wait time was a year or two, not 40.)
> Unless you're only using built-in laptop keyboard/trackpad

Well, I am. I find it too cumbersome otherwise. If I wanted to have a desktop workstation, I would have a desktop PC - with a laptop, I'm working on its keyboard and touchpad, so I can move with it anywhere I want and still be as comfortable using it as usual.
The default ImGui rasterizer (imstb_truetype) is rubbish. The new rasterizer (imgui_freetype) should be used instead.

https://github.com/ocornut/imgui/tree/master/misc/freetype
But that media is not in your free country, it's hosted outside. You're banning people connecting to servers in other countries, hosted under their laws.
I Now Support Comments