skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You probably know that you can get the first half of that at

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...

(that is, you can see the most-upvoted comments, but you do see the count of upvotes)
The investors didn't put money toward it because it had no economic foundation. Uranium is too cheap, enrichment became cheaper, and separated plutonium has negative value. The French have admitted their reprocessing was net more expensive than not doing it.
1) you need an archive node to get historical events which is the only way to do lots of things. E.g. scrape all NFTs

2) Erigon has horrible bugs and is missing data. I filled a ticket against one such issue and they "fixed" it by making the exception go away and returning null. Their lack of attention to detail made me abandon the project.

If you know someone in the project I can produce MANY examples and would be willing to do so because running an archive geth node sucks.
Docker? Just use SELinux or Apparmor, seccomp, Xephyr, or something.
I guess that was my problem too. I’ve been writing a lot lately though.

Added to the profile now. Maybe they get me next time.
The author does a great job sharing his joy for programming. Programming's pretty great!
Can someone explain to me how they got a list of all the users?

> Downloaded all HN users from BigQuery

??
Are you stuck in 1999? :-P

I don't think the Internet is overwhelmingly male
It's not just greed like other commenters might be implying. Like you say many reformulations happen because IFRA (the International Fragrance Association) updates their list of restricted or prohibited substances. Their work is necessary and important to ensure everyone's health. Just recently (March this year) the IFRA-imposed ban on Lilial (butylphenyl methylpropional) went into effect, which was suspected to lead to infertility. So it's important someone has an eye on this. Almost always fragrances end up significantly weaker after such reformulations.

Also after the 80s, where fragrances were much stronger, it's just a "trend" nowadays to have weaker fragrances.

Of course it's also greed, because very often fragrances get reformulated without an obvious external reason and they often end up a shadow of their former selves. If a fragrance has a critical popularity, you can simply cut it's potency in half and people will still buy it.

I also want to add that the performance of a fragrance depends a lot on the moisture of your skin. Fragrances disappear on dry skin much quicker. So if you moisturize your skin before applying a fragrance, you will have longer of it. My skin got much drier with age (and it's getting worse), so maybe this is also part of what you are observing.
As kindly as possible - if your anecdote about your teenager misbehaving is scratching the countertop, you may just have an unusually well behaved teenager. What would your response be if he drove drunk and crashed your car? Or if he you got in an argument and he took a swing at you?

If those are outside the realm of possibility for you guys, that’s awesome, you probably have an awesome kid. But for most parents I know, their teenagers have seriously test their limits at least a few times and it seemed like a punitive approach worked well. Depending on the “crime”, grounding them at home or taking away their phone/car/screens for x amount of time is a perfectly reasonable punishment IMO. It certainly worked well enough on my four siblings and I when we did dumb crap as teenagers.
when two companies try to use the same name for something they get into a trademark dispute.

when two teams in the same company want to use the same name, do they battle it out using swords and office chairs?
Can greasemonkey/clones suppress the display of upvotes?

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...
In Soviet Russia, driver protects car.
I’m not going to argue that it’s impossible that she was using the term as a dog whistle.

But people have been referring to criminals of every race as predators well before 1988 and they have continued doing to this day.

If you look at usage of the word predator, my bet is it is associated with generic criminals (particularly sexual criminals) far more frequently than it’s deliberately used as a dog whistle.

When Clinton made this speech, it aired on C-Span and would have been forgotten but for opposition research. I think it’s very unlikely, she deliberately chose the word to send out a dog whistle to racists who happen to be watching the ostensibly liberal President’s wife on C-Span.

I think the more likely explanation is that a speech writer thought it sounded punchy because they’d heard it being used, and she didn’t think twice about using the term to refer to gang members.

That doesn’t mean that many uses of the word don’t have racist meanings. Or that it’s impossible that Clinton used it with racists invent. It does mean that it’s a big logical leap to say:

Some racists refer to young Black criminals as predators, and Hilary Clinton uses the word to refer the superset of young gang members, therefore Hilary Clinton deliberately and with racist intent used the word specifically to refer to young Black gang members.

Particularly to the level of confidence that you’re quoting her as saying “black super predators”.

Notably Bill Clinton is never on record as having used the word, and he is the one who met with the guy who coined it.

If he inteneded to co-opt the word to use as a racist dog whistle, why did he never use it himself? And why did his wife only use it the one time?
Which was then circumvented by a third party. The legal maneuvering wasn't that novel: despite what Apple advertised, Apple could obtain the data off the device, and the FBI simply asked Apple to do it for them.
Competition doesn't motivate me, and if I want to feel like I'm "achieving something" I can go lift weights.
"without regressing to the juvenile act of moralizing."

? It's not 'juvenile' to call a murderer, a murderer.

It's juvenile to contemplate otherwise with whataboutery.

Putin is a mass killer, absolutely, within the historical realities of "Budapest, Maidan, Orange Revolution, Donbass - and even 'Washington's Involvement'"

It's juvenile (or maybe 'in bad faith', or 'dumb', or 'evil')to hide under their propaganda and hold it at face value.

Putin has been interfering in Ukraine since it gained independence, he poisoned Yuschenko (and of course poisoned and killed so many of his other opponents), he has his GRU thugs all over Ukraine corrupting, bribing etc. trying to gain control, trying to turn Ukraine into a vassal, exactly along the lines of Belarus, where has that living fart Lukashenko do whatever he wants.

He bribed and played 'both sides' of the 2014 Donbas conflict and lies blatantly all the time about supposed NATO concerns etc..

Putin is a Russian Imperialist Fascist who is 100% responsible for the war, mass murder, suppression within his domain (Russia, Belarus etc.) in the same vein as innumerable leaders before him.

That's 'immoral'.
I searched on several sites to find out what their memory management strategy is but couldn’t figure it out. GC? ARC? Whatever Rust does? Would love to see where this fits. Exciting to see a neat new language though! Also my second favourite feature of rust and swift is Enums with associated values, I can’t see any info on this but I saw a blog mention they have it.
Your link talks about age discrimination in hiring.

I was interested in a reputation for firing based on age.

(The link about IBM explicitly talked about firing based on age.)
> while the last one I can't place

Munj, apparently
Average American drives 14,263 miles per year.
Tesla Model 3 consumes 0.27 kWh/mi.
Average American driving a Tesla uses 3851.01 kWh / year.

60MW reactor produces 525,600,000 kWh / year.

So a single NuScale reactor could power a garage with 136,483 electric cars.
But the "Battleship" game has five different kinds of ships, only one of which it calls a battleship, and it does include cruisers and destroyers.
To my mind React is a couple different things:

- A VDOM (a library that lets you construct a virtual-dom, and then reconciles it with the previous one, and patches the real DOM accordingly)

- A state management/reactivity system (state hooks, effects, etc, and really also class components and their state/lifecycle)

- A framework which ties the above two together into a cohesive package for building web UIs

For me, the term "VDOM" only refers to that first point; i.e. you could combine a VDOM library with some other stuff to make a React-like framework

That could just be me, though
No, but that's also not relevant as C++ is ABI stable. I can take any C++ compiler, and I can compile any C++ library, and then I can take some other compiler and compile some other piece of C++ that calls my library, and it will Just Work.

I can then go back to my library, and make a bunch of ABI safe changes, just as I would have to do in C, and compile my library again, with yet another compiler. At that point the program that was using the older version of my library, would continue to work with the new build of my library without needing to be recompiled.

This is because C++ is ABI stable.

If I am in C++, and I make an ABI breaking change to something that is used as a base class elsewhere, then I have broken the ABI.

But this problem also exists in C, for exactly the same reason, for example lets make some silly example C

If I am a C library, and my header declares a struct

struct AwesomeThing {
intptr_t foo;
};

void doSomething(struct AwesomeThing* thing) {
thing->foo = 0;
}

And then someone uses my library in their code:

struct ImAwesomeToo {
struct AwesomeThing theAwesomest;
int* thisFieldIsGreat;
};

int doSomethingElse() {
struct ImAwesomeToo thing;
thing.thisFieldIsGreat = malloc(sizeof(int));
doSomething(&thing.theAwesomest);
free(thing.thisFieldIsGreat);
}

Obviously this is a somewhat silly example, but now say I make a change to my library:

struct AwesomeThing {
intptr_t foo;
double bar;
}

void doSomething(struct AwesomeThing* thing) {
thing->bar = 42;
}

By the standard rules I haven't "broken" ABI, but now that call to free() is going to cause problems.

That's the fragile base class problem.

If you are making an API that will have ABI stability requirements you have to expend quite a bit of effort designing the API so it's not only pleasant to use, but also can be evolved without breaking the ABI. As with C APIs, the people who make C++ APIs, know how to make them robust as well.

That said you could have a C or C++ ABI that is ABI stable, it just hurts performance, and obviously adopting that would break ABI :D

Anyway, the problem with what rust and co are saying, is that the same source can result in different ABIs from one compiler version to the next, or for one API to compile to a different ABI depending on what the rest of the code in the project is doing.

That means the OS can't use the safe language as an actual OS API, which I just think is wasting an opportunity.

Swift manages, and ostensibly performs the same kind of optimizations within a module, which is most of what you want. That said because it's the system API all objects are refcounted, and the recount is atomic - I was writing a raytracer in it (this is how I learn programming languages) and the refcount overhead was annoying to deal with.

Obviously there are trade offs in all the choices, but I still feel like rust, etc could do more. Rust has rich support for annotations, so an "abi_stable" annotation seems like it would be perfectly reasonable - it would be in keeping with rust's general theme of the default behaviour not having any implicit performance costs, but would be easy and very clear when you were making something into an API.
2022 Amish Population Profile
vim or emacs?
@inferiorhuman I suspect your position is on the progressive side of the spectrum. I don't think Jenkins is 'just a mouthpiece for Breed'. She was the former lead hate crimes prosecutor under the permissive Boudin in the DA office before resigning due to lack of progress. She is very focused on destroying the cartel drug dealers in SF, and doesn't spend much time on prosecuting substance abuse victims.
Surely that's insider trading...
I don't think that's what makes carless existence unrealistic for most people - the fact is our cities have evolved on the assumption we all have cars, hence we think nothing of making decisions that force us to travel significant distances for shopping, work, dining out, visiting family/friends. That's not going to change by removing laws requiring parking minimums (though I certainly agree doing so is low hanging fruit).
The Clear-Site-Data HTTP Header
That would be disastrous for anyone who has a debt to repay.
I imagine GP is talking about every macOS update forcibly overwriting /etc/zshrc.

They bothered writing a system capable of dropping the conflicted file in Relocated Items for us to optionally use--but they appear to be only using it for /etc/bashrc, and not /etc/zshrc. So, people who use zsh by choice or default get dumped on a bit :/

Some background in https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/3616
The fixed point in time that send is hurtling into this doomed timeline.
Haven’t used Libredirect, but there’s also https://farside.link (on GitHub: https://github.com/benbusby/farside). Not an extension, but it redirects to an active instance for most privacy friendly front ends just by adding farside.link to the beginning (i.e. https://farside.link/https://twitter.com/elonmusk would redirect to a random active nitter instance). Also works for medium.com, YouTube, etc.
The Country That Wants to ‘Be Average’ vs. Jeff Bezos and His $500M Yacht
If both sides are just repeating the same points, then there's no diff, and if there's no diff then it's off topic for this site. Diffs are what's interesting.

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so...
See https://console.cloud.google.com/marketplace/details/y-combi...
> Clojure libraries target microservices with a precision that ..

I’m not sure what that means exactly, but no one is using Rails only for building out micro services. They’re using Rails to go from nothing to a production ready web application, with all the incidental complexity taken care of, in a very short time.

It’s been a few years since I was involved with Clojure ecosystem - what is the Clojure experience equivalent to say, the original Rails demo from back in 2005? The last I tried, all the parts seemed to be there, but much painful assembly/“composing” was required and not all the parts fitted which ended up producing a lot of awkward complexity needing desperate decomplecting.
And you do this to install MySQL?
From this? https://console.cloud.google.com/marketplace/details/y-combi...
The QuickDraw GX Fan Club (1996)
I recently had tried to use Nix again after a hiatus. I wished to use Nix to replace Homebrew, but also for managing versions, of like Ruby or dotnet.

Sadly, it's not quite there for my needs, but it's getting better. Flakes are more fleshed out, the CLI is improving in it's user experience. I still don't feel like I understand the language works and build my flakes off of copying/pasting the one that works.
Ok, you can think that, but there's still no explanation here as to why they can't do it. You should read some other comments further down in the thread, like this one:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32292222

If the hope is that they just won't shut down the internet, or the government will be too weak to stop it... what's the point of cryptocurrency? You could again just get them to use USD or Euro or something else.
Learning everyone else has intrusive thoughts, and it's not just me, blew my mind.

I'm glad we can all be crazy together I guess? :)
I think it would be reasonable to tax one of non-resident citizens or non-citizen residents, but not full taxation of both. And residence is far more of a choice than citizenship is.
I just mean a paywall without workarounds (as the sibling comments have pointed out).

Paywalls with workarounds are ok on HN, paywalls with no workaround are not.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so...

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10178989
I am a libertarian and I fundamentally believe the current central banking model is not only hopelessly corrupt but morally evil. Politicians have been able to steal from common people via inflation for a century while the rich are easily protected.

This is a long topic but to summarize I am quite hopeful that the ability for governments to extract wealth is limited greatly by the rise of crypto. If the government wants taxes they can do it by selling services to people who can pay for them if they agree it has value.

Of course I’m a minority but like all movements crypto is selling something to average people but the grand plan is only understood by a minority. Countries like Argentina have been basket cases for decades despite endless bailouts and IMF shenanigans. It’s time for something new that I believe is a valuable experiment with clear theoretic and ideological underpinnings that couldn’t possibly be worse than the socialist nightmare destroying billions of common people.
Goodness gracious you have assumed a lot about me. Fret not, I’m not an office lover.

Going to provide a bit of advice. Take it or leave it.

If you don’t want to work in an office, those office lovers are going to need to appreciate your side too. If you’re hoping for a compromise, at least. You may want to alienate them a bit less, or it will be you versus them. And if they win, back you go!
...only if it means moving to poorer place (this needs rent/buying property regulation).

The other way you would end up with rich countries (read EU for instance) collapsing under flood of economic migrants unless they would completely scratch any welfare. We see where it goes with "refugees". There is reason why economic migration should be regulated, I have no problem welcoming economic migrants who upon arrival declares he won't use and won't be eligible to any welfare in next five years, but it would still cause problems anyway with people living in ghettoes willing to lube worth much lower living standard undercutting locals from low paid jobs.
Oh I see, it's in the bio. I thought they were looking at submission history. I don't understand why having Twitter in your bio makes you uninteresting
It is a problem indeed. We do not want the same: 'crypto is scam', 'ban all of crypto', 'no use case', or 'it's early days', 'adoption is round the corner' and 'it will take over the current system' etc sort of responses that have been recycled from other critics and maximalists and parroted here.

Given this keeps happening, the fact is, there are no new arguments from both those totally for and those totally against it and they keep having to repeat themselves or at worst their arguments are not in good faith and they are not attacking the best representation of it in each crypto-related thread.

I'm lead to believe that in all these threads, it isn't 100% going to get destroyed no matter how upset and angry the anti-crypto folks are or how much they want it to, but it is neither going to take over the world as well; a narrative made by the delusional and aggressive pro-crypto folks. Both of them will be very disappointed in their utopian goals.

Posts like this one only confirm this, and both maximalists and the critics are giving very narrow extreme responses which sounds like both of them are trying to boost replies and clickbait.

Either way, it is inevitably going to get regulated and crypto will continue to survive with 90% of the meme coins and useless projects dead and with the rest of the useful ones being here to stay.
why is the karma of the top 10 not listed on that page along with the others? Seems like an odd omission since you can easily find out the karma for each person if you wish
I still use vim for light editing tasks (mostly when I'm already in a command line), but VS Code is my main, largely because of its excellent rust-analyzer integration. At other times I have used emacs and Sublime.
> The issue is if enough people are willing to go back in the office for stuff like free brownie Wednesdays, we all have to go back.

This sounds like being against democracy because you won't always be in the majority.

> Many people have commutes of anywhere from 3 to 4 hours per day

The word "many" is doing a lot of work there. Most people's commutes are way shorter than that.
The site guidelines answer that question.

You're changing the subject a bit, though, because most of the abusive comments you've posted here have nothing to do with that scenario.
That's exactly the behavior that makes NodeJS unsuitable as a package manager. Some resources are, in fact, globals. You should have a consistent enough API to use those through code that is imported and singular, rather than through importing a dozen versions of the API for each dependency you have.
Interesting… doesn’t seem to have a lot of docs on this. Surprised they didn’t just go along with RocksDB
I understand the meaning of this saying, but it's always sounded weird to me because it makes it sound like there's been a ban on planting new trees since 19 years ago.
> benefits are immense

Such as?
It's like a system-wide home-manager alternative for Darwin systems. Or the other way - a NixOS-like whole system management that works on top of Darwin.

For some examples: you can manage your homebrew packages, set keyboard preferences, trackpad settings, updates, finder defaults, etc through the nix config.
I saw the author was using vite, they have a mode to help you build a library that would mitigate their woes. Check it out!

https://vitejs.dev/guide/build.html#library-mode
It’s pretty solved. There is very little of the dangerous stuff, and it is far less dangerous after a few decades. It can safely sit in casks for more than a thousand years. At which point there’s a negligible amount of anything really nasty left. At any point we can basically just stick it all in a salt mine and call it a day.

Future people will be fine. Shit we discovered uranium because some guys wandered into a cave and it burned their skin. Locals avoided it afterwards and eventually it was studied by people who knew what radiation was. Any actual storage though would be deep underground, in casks, and behind concrete with lots of warning signs.
Worries me that in a lot of hospitals, esp in developing countries, the heart rate is still taken as the default indicator for life.
Forever young and scandal-free: Rise of South Korea's virtual influencers
This sort of reasoning makes sense at population scale, but not particularly for individual decision making if someone is spending their own money.
No nuclear power competes with base load power like coal, natural gas, and eventually battery storage.
Because in major cities, it's more likely that you'll need to dig that area up again for something else.
It's the same as the most expensive residential rooftop solar. Nuclear is about 8-10x the total cost vs utility scale solar projects.
What happened to the xi-editor?
>Thought experiment: who can buy the most shares of others? And if they buy "well", how does the distribution of wealth shift?

It shifts to the sellers, not the buyers. That's because buyers are competing with each other which drives the expected return close to the general market rate.

Assume there's a magical oracle that tells you: this kid will generate $100M of wealth over their lifetime - to not get bogged down into discounted future value, lets say the risk free rate is 0% - but needs $500k for education and resources early.
Without any investment the kid will become stuck in a local maximum in a shitty environment and generate $100k instead.

Market competition will bring the total sale amount close to 0.5%. Lets say it's 1%, although that's very high. Funds bought shares that are 'fairly' worth $1M for $500k, for a profit of $500k - not bad. The person gained $99M. Total distribution of wealth becomes more fair, not less.