skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yeah; but people get cranky when you point out that one side is propped up by foreign propagandists that have explicitly said they're trying to destabilize the US.
Animals eat farmed plants, and the amount of death/suffering required to produce the caloric equivalent is several orders of magnitude higher.
I've never used Caddy, and I'm not sure how dynamic it is. I use Traefik for reverse proxy so that each docker-compose configures the proxy for the application in that folder using labels. docker-compose up/down adds and removes the proxy config for that application.

There's an externally defined Docker network for the reverse proxy and web applications.

Each app should run it's own self-contained everything. App, DB, Redis, you name it.

I use the term "application" fairly vaguely. The number of containers each directory contains really depends on the application.

Real world example. These are each a single docker-compose file:

Nextcloud, has containers for application, PostgreSQL DB, Redis, Draw.io, and Collabora CODE. I use all of this exclusively from Nextcloud so it made sense to bunch them together. Nextcloud, Draw.io, and Collabora are all added to the reverse_proxy network in addition to the one docker-compose automatically creates.

Gitea has the application container and it's own PostgreSQL container. Again, the Gitea application is added to the reverse_proxy network.

This simplifies it when I want to back up or move between machines. It also makes it possible to run different DB versions should you run into incompatibilities. It kind of sounds like you're trying to run a single DB server for everything?
What can they offer that 5G doesn't in an urban environment? You can get 100 mbps on a 5 w energy budget in a city.
> He is one of the only characters able to just casually put on the one ring with seemingly no effect and then give it back immediately afterwards.

OK, that's fair enough. But to my mind, this is just a setup that cries out for an explanation that never comes. It's a major flaw in the dramatic structure of the narrative, a bug not a feature.

But I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree about that.
I will never understand these valuations when there are no network effects involved.
`> biological dictates` Note that the point of my response was not the present the decision as a binary but a spectrum.

Should we have meat as part of the daily diet, probably not. Should we never eat meat for moral reasons? I don't think that is true. In the most extreme case, I'd argue things like auto-cannibalism are always ethical (You can know that you consent, especially when meat is produced via hypothetical vegan cloning methods)
Why are your kind so desperate to spin this situation into anything remotely positive? Is it buyer's remorse? Tribalism? Desperation?

We're in deep shit. A lot of people saw it coming, a lot of people ignored the warnings. A lot of people tried to spin this like it was no big deal "nothing to see here, all is well." It doesn't matter if this is a damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-dont - we're in the shit now, and that's all that matters.
I was mostly bummed the barrow-wights were utterly missing from the movies.
It’s not uncommon in the UK to have a house in the countryside and an apartment in the city where they work.

I can see such people using the sleeper train to London, work for a few days there, sleeping in their apartment, and returning using another sleeper train.
Does Godot's implenetation of C#/.net include the .net temeletry?

https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/issues/14556
Define "like it". Many people also drink themselves to death or OD on heroin because they "like it".

I don't think it's that hard to differentiate between things people do for enjoyment that they think of as a positive influence, and addictive substances that can fleetingly make people "feel better" but are extremely harmful.

Most addicts may say they enjoy getting high, while even simultaneously talking about how drugs have ruined their lives. The fact that social media companies have hacked the same brain pathways doesn't mean the answer should be "it's fine, they all like it!"
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS12026620

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/U6RATE

That doesn’t appear to be the cae
I've been collecting and sharing (@QuiverCongress on Twitter) data on stock trading by U.S. congressmen for the past couple years.

While there is currently legislation that requires congressmen to disclose their financial dealings, enforcement around it is incredibly weak.

Congressmen are supposed to disclose stock transactions within 45 days of when they are made, but in practice there are dozens of violations of this rule which result in hardly a slap on the wrist. I've seen a couple cases of politicians conveniently waiting till after election cycles to disclose controversial trades.

While I'm generally pessimistic about the odds of congress voting to regulate itself, I'm still hopeful that something comes from this push. There's certainly a lot of room for improvement.
https://help.gumroad.com/article/260-your-payout-settings-pa...

Gumroad itself uses Stripe, it seems so if Stripe decides to hold funds it's likely Gumroad will just forward that experience to you.
I've seen the word recession thrown around plenty in the press; who's avoiding saying it?

As pointed out by another commenter the NBER has never failed to declare a recession after two consecutive quarters of GDP reduction. This is a preliminary report, I would expect them to wait for the full report to actually declare it.

These things work a certain way. Whether that way is good or bad isn't relevant to this particular point, by expecting that way to change on a whim you're just being impatient.
Google CA can now be used with Cloudflare Certificate Manager
We also dramatically increase the amount of plants we need to grow by feeding so much grass and grain to live stock. We can reduce the footprint of eating plants and hurting animals by not farming livestock for meat at all. It would be a net win, even with the incidental damage done by farming vegetables/grains/etc.
It's always odd when someone picks apart a work of fiction with the tools of realism. It tells me they either have too much time on their hands, or they have missed the entire point of stories.
I have nothing todo with Retool, but I'm curious about the problem you are trying to solve. What do you want to consume the mock api?

a) Is this for rapid prototypes? (web? mobile?)
b) Do you have a microservice architecture and you want to mock out one of the services? (dev? ci?)
c) something else?

Lets say the generator looks at your schema and generates an api, how much would you want to tweak/customize that api?

Is the mock api returning data based on what's in the database? If so, can the mock api mutate data in the database?
> The American shale revolution did bring the country “energy independence,” whatever that has been worth, and more abundant oil and gas.

In the face of this, calling fracking an extraordinary boondoggle is a privileged, luxury opinion. For people less well economically situated the lower energy and oil prices enabled by fracking have made a large difference in their quality of life, directly for transporation and for the overall cost of goods. My congratulations to the author if those things aren't that important to him, but we're not all that fortunate.
Seems like a stretch to justify meat eating with species preservation.

Maybe in 100 years you can bring up this argument when plant- and lab-based substitutes are widely available and the cows are at the brink of extinction. But at this point of human history, the vegetarian can credibly argue that they want to reduce animal suffering while meat eater can not similarly counter that they eat meat to preserve the species.

I know the argument is supposed to be on a philosophical level, but I just can't suspend my disbelief to an extent required to seriously engage with the argumentation.

Will be interesting to revisit this in 50-100 years perhaps. But one would hope that humanity then has created nature reserves for wild cattle and so on.
Just to say that we're actively switching away from retool because you insist on charging £10 a month users who are a simply view form thats already built. I can understand charging for building and launching a form, I can understand charging something for a view only, but the same as builder? na I think not. Good luck with your pricing
If it's any consolation I used your site at the beginning of the pandemic to get a photo from our office to use as a virtual background.
You know, back when virtual backgrounds were new and it was still funny to fool people into thinking you're in the office (which was closed).
Very, very little of the swift surface language is not part of the standard library. "Basic" types like `Int` and operations like `==` are defined in the standard library, rather than built-in.
I was surprised that one of the definitions of Female is exactly as quoted so I looked up male and one of the definitions is:

> having a gender identity that is the opposite of female

we have achieved word definition stack overflow!
We squandered it all, and in exchange we got strip malls, plastic baubles, and disposable food containers. If I weren't a human myself, I'd be watching its extinction from the sidelines while saying, "Good riddance."
To clarify, I don't mean to say the US is looking like a direct democracy. I mean to say that maybe we can think of social media as a microcosm that shows what direct democracy might look like.

Topics going viral are sort of like issues coming up for a vote, and the result is that you see different consensuses emerge and different real world consequences (companies changing policies and making phony apologies for things, for example).
What ramraj is talking about: if you go into a competitive grad program to get a PhD in structural biology, your advisor will probably expect that in 3-4 years you will: crystallize a protein of interest, collect enough data to make a model, and publish that model in a major journal. Many people in my program could not graduate until they had a Nature or Science paper (my advisor was not an asshole, I graduated with just a paper in Biochemistry).

In a sense both of you are right- DeepMind is massively overplaying the value of what they did, trying to expand its impact far beyond what they actually achieved (this is common in competitive biology), but what they did was such an improvement over the state of the art that it's considered a major accomplishment. It also achieved the target of CASP- which was to make predictions whose scores are indistinguishable from experimentally determined structures.

I don't think academics thought CASP was unwinnable but most groups were very surprised that an industrial player using 5 year old tech did so well.
Thanks! I will correct this.
Generating PDF invoices using Lago
This applies to basically the entire spectrum of humanity, not just readers of “fake news”.

For example NYT published all kinds of hyperbolic garbage the last 2.5 years that scared the living daylights out of their readers. It took them better part of an entire year before they stopped saying that the IFR for Covid was 4%, despite there being ample real world data to suggest it was several orders of magnitude lower. Will they ever publish a correction for that? Is what they published “fake news”? I mean the figure they published was based on some sketchy model made by a person with a long history of publishing sketchy models… some “expert” said it was true, so it has to be right?

“Fake news” is just a way to dismiss anything that isn’t aligned with the current dogma. Plenty of “fake news” turned out to be quite real over the course of the last two years.

And yes there is actual fake news out there. But too many people think that whatever they are reading isn’t also “fake news”. Everybody needs to think critically about what they read. Just because NYT or The Atlantic said it doesn’t mean it is true either.
... there are millions of other professional developers in the world. There are almost 0 new products you could develop right now that many many other developers can't.
This somewhat assumes that the purpose of democracy is to create stability and institutional trust at the possible expense of freedom.

Social media creates terrible disorder compared to what you can get by ABC, CBS, and NBC giving you roughly the same nightly news and fostering agreement among the masses. At that time, getting into the mass media business was costly. There wasn't too much competition if you wanted that kind of reach.

But now, reach is very different. Gone are the days when reach was restricted to the upper crust. Now, some YouTuber can gain a following that rivals one of these esteemed institutions.

So I'll ask the big question. Does society need gatekeepers to control who has reach in order to remain stable? You can easily argue that it still does, but they're people who tweak algorithms or work at trust & safety departments. And if society needs these gatekeepers, what should their qualifications be?
I have tried lots of AI-generated video tools recently and this is one of the top 3 on my list. As a programmer, I tried to run the algorithm following the papers for several times. However, I found that the outcome was not as good as I imagined, because there are a lot of edge cases that need to be solved.
Besides, I can use my own videos to train now. If I want to have more characters, I need to have videos of multiple models to train, which takes time (and money, of course). I would rather stick with services/products provided by other companies.
The language main purpose was always to be a replacement for C, C++ and Objective-C.

It has been on Swift documentation from day one.
>The physical volume of gold has very little to do with how expensive it is to keep safe.

I'm having my doubts about that. If I can fit all my life's savings in my pocket, I would very much prefer to do that with savings in one pocket and gat in the other (yes I know gold doesn't fit that for everyone, but lets imagine the physical volume is smaller since you said it doesn't matter). Fight to the death against violent intrusion upon your person. That doesn't incur me any material cost. If I die I won't be needing it anyway. would 100000% prefer that to sitting in the bank where some bonehead at a three letter agency can freeze or seize it at will, maybe the help of a rubber stamping judge. Or worse yet some unelected governors at the fed just choose to inflate it away.

I guess there is some argument to be made it's cheaper to keep something safe if it is either very small or very large. Small enough and you can more effectively hide it or keep it on your person. Large enough and someone will need a semi, a few men, and a big forklift or crane to steal it. Houses come to mind as something worth a lot but unpractical to steal in the conventional sense of just taking off with it.

I can't imagine the amount of costs lost in places like Argentina by people trying to find a way to keep their fiat held in a safe way.
Raises that are a percentage will compound over multiple iterations, that's what he meant.
Actually they refer to suffering as one alternative a few times:

"Even if, on net, the humans in the alien world suffer, is oblivion really the preferable alternative to net suffering? Especially if you could alleviate that suffering through action?"
https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/ar...
The important point is that that is a hypothetical. In the US for example, that hypothetical is incredibly far from present reality.
Presumably many of the travelers would have had no where else to spend the night, at least without incurring substantial expense.
"overlooked"

Unfortunately I'm too cynical to think that something that obvious would be merely overlooked (rather than intentionally left out). If it's an incremental step forward, I'll take it anyway.
If I was a customer and Stripe (or any other company) started releasing private correspondence and financial details publicly because someone on the internet claiming to be me complained about the company, and the company took that as implicitly waiving any privacy obligations, I'd be pretty upset. If they said that the prurient interest of their other customers in the details was part of their decision I'd be even more upset!
Five security principles for billions of messages across Meta’s apps
It was the DG Eclipse MV/8000. There's a pretty good overview/references at https://people.cs.clemson.edu/~mark/330/eagle.html. There is little new under the sun, and I get a migraine from the reflexive eye-roll when I read about some 'totally new and original innovation' in computers that's actually been around for decades, usually touted by people who weren't even alive when it was first created.
Why academics have been begging for the return of JSTOR mech for years
Haha thought about doing that for offices/companies that are hiring!

Haven't fully thought out how that would look but it's definitely interesting...
The Pfizer vaccine for one.
Reading it again as an adult (read outloud in full to my daughter when she was 11 or 12 or so, before watching the movies) I really liked Bombadil. But I didn't dig that section at all when I read the books as a 14 year old. It seemed whimsical and childish. More fairy tale than the overall dark and serious epic tone in the rest of the book.

I see the Bombadil portion and the sections after it as Tolkien making the transition from "I'm writing a sequel to The Hobbit with a similar feel" to "I'm writing a sequel to my Silmarillion, with much more mature and darker themes". I think Bombadil fits more in the style of The Hobbit (fundamentally a children's book) than the larger Quenta Silmarillion.
And yet, use any Google property with Tor (or any website using their captcha service), and half the time you are presented with a slow captcha, and the other half with an endless captcha, while numerous common firewalls outright block all Tor exit nodes. And this is for read only access to websites.

Can we understand this war on privacy as cooperation with Russian censorship?
Anyone remember usesthis.com?
/sarcasm/ Why would game devs write tests?

On a more serious note, I do expect test-ability isn't a high customer priority for Godot. Godot is self-hosted, maybe check how they run their tests?
You are talking past parent. They are saying the cancellation is a signaling mechanism that gives them no confidence to build out new refineries and other infra that is required to lower prices.
Argo CD goes mainstream with hosted version
"Harmful to democracy" = "Harmful to people who are currently in control"
Your issue with the analogy is that it doesn't include an indefinite timeline for the eventual return of the property? You might be missing the forest here.
Controversial content is the one getting promoted more. More often not because of the content itself, but because of the amount of comments (read, fights) attached to it.
Why does everything you personally don't agree with have to be a "conspiracy theory"? Seems like a trend these days!
Things sysadmins should know about software development
I skipped Tom Bombadil—even on my rereading of the cycle. Completely irrelevant to the story and entirely Tolkien the Old English professor marking time. Absolutely nothing is lost from the quality of story by dropping him, and ignoring him makes the whole series more accessible.

Then again, I’m not one of those folks who considers Tolkien sacrosanct. I generally think that he’s a bit like George Lucas: a pretty good idea guy, some interesting ideas, but not the best person to write the stories.
If things returned to normal, then you can't really blame the pandemic. When this thread started the war in Ukraine was the issue.
Yeah, I can't get past that sentence either, and it's the 2nd sentence. I just don't get the impression they know what they're talking about and have serious doubts about spending time reading the rest of it.
While this project might focus on the “easy” definition of portable, I’ve never seen this done before. This post was both interesting and informative.

I don’t think you comparing your (unlinked and unnamed) kernel to this is very constructive. It feels like you’re gate-keeping.
If it becomes a big enough liability that prominent representatives are concerned about their reelection due to it then it will happen.

Yes, Congress is reluctant to specifically legislate against itself, so to make it happens a stink must be raised.
> We should eat less meat and probably far less beef

Why beef specifically?
Attorneys handle this in most jurisdictions.

Are there no DAO attorneys springing up yet?
Former professional game dev getting into Godot recently for fun and maybe for hire.

What are the limitations of gdscript you allude to? Let's say I want to render an infinite scrolling hex grid. Why would c# excel or gdscript struggle?
Apple stated at WWDC that is now being used on system level on Ventura.

They also dedicated some time on the state of the frameworks session, to put it clearly out there that Objective-C is done and it is time to move on.

It took about 20 years for C++ to take over some key areas to C, and even there it wasn't a success in POSIX and embedded, where C still rules.

8 years isn't nothing.
Its a bit different for someone "thinking of doing this" and seeking it out.
> Agreed, it's hard to imagine voluntarily embarrassing yourself in public as badly as the author has done here.

That's a common problem on Substack, it seems. Lots of people writing long "essays" on topics they don't quite understand, but think they do.
Sure, but there might be a lot of products that people who are not developers yet won;t be able to develop. Todo lists are easy to develop even for beginners, PaaS cloud platforms not so much, for example.
It’s something that’s pretty nice once you’ve implemented these lifecycles a bunch.

The tree turns out to be a great place to keep things, and you get several levels of control. Here’s how I think about it now.

`_init`: constructor. I usually use this to create dynamic child nodes

`_enter_tree`: now we have a parent; subscribe to signals, copy initial config, etc

`_ready`: I can be sure that all child nodes have called _ready, so anything I depend on there is… er, ready

`_exit_tree`: cleanup, especially anything we did with the parent and other ancestors. usually symmetric to `_enter_tree` if I’m using them

I just did a find all in my biggest recent project, and I never actually use `queue_free` or `free` for explicit memory management. Most of the times when I’ve thought I needed to, I actually was creating a bug
It's funny how the robot argument can apply to anything and the contrary: are all filming crews overworked robots unable to willingly decide to engaging in casual conversation with a stranger who happened to be in a public area before it was cordoned off?
Why? because then you end up surprised of not having traveled anywhere a few hours later because you missed an important announcement
?? I see him as having had a different picture as of this [0] edit (several years ago). The filename (MarkRonchettiNM.png) is a different filename than the current one, leading me to believe that the file was simply taken off the Wikipedia servers and redlinked.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mark_Ronchetti&ol...
Was that actually the headline before?

The title I get is the same minus the "white". I wonder if it's A/B testing.
Each of those 5 are PHd topics individually.
This is a wonderful spin; the author says that they don't believe Tolkien intended this. But it's a fun thing to think about.
Yep, and folks could even have a credit of 500 phone calls a month, or whatever a reasonable number would be, so no cost to consumers at all. Instead of a tax, it should be a minimum charge that goes to the carriers. So that they would be incentivized to collect it.
Let's get real...

*** TERM LIMITS ***

.