skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If you had pure copper conductors could you even get enough into a 1 meter space to conduct that much power?

If we're going to need high temperature superconductors and fusion power, this isn't the first thing I'd use it for.

(I can't deny the fun factor of this, though.)
> because they don't want users to discover that some things they profit from are in fact extremely easy to do

I have to laugh at these conspiracy theories.

The real reason is the operating systems no longer come with a BASIC prompt. This is true for Windows, OSX, and that corporate Linux product.

If every operating system, including phones, came with an icon that opened to a BASIC prompt, I bet you'd see an explosion of programming competence especially among young people.
>Make sure you're on the latest firmware

If I may interject, overriding Kobo's firmware with KOReader (simple drag-n-drop of a file) gave a second life to my Aura 2. It's made it responsive and snappy while providing more features. It may not be necessary for newer ones (or for cover art on sleep), but I was on the fence to upgrade my 5 year old e-reader before trying it, feels like a new device now.
It seems like your view is informed from a cursory reading of the docs, rather than any first-hand experience.

Docker produces OCI images, there's no need to "export them" in that format.

So since Kubernetes can run any OCI image, and Docker images are OCI, Kubernetes supports running Docker images out of the box.

The documentation you linked to is if you wanted to swap out the container runtime Kubernetes is using, not if you just want to run a Docker image.
Agreed. It also reminded me of the book Illness as Metaphor by Susan Sontag. In the essay she talks about the social perception and behaviors around illness and how those create real barriers to overcoming and curing disease. Specifically, the she writes about how consumption was at one time fashionable due to the gaunt physique and blasé attitude TB would often cause.
Apologies for the late reply.

Most of the day to day and big library build stuff is a semi closed personal network of farmers, consultants (IT, agronomy, etc) .. but here in Western Australia it culminates in a year by year guide for farmers:

https://www.agric.wa.gov.au/grains-research-development/2022...

with most public faces and material found under the "Grains research & development" umbrella (levelling up from the sowing guide link).
You're being downvoted, and I have no idea if that's what is happening here, but I will say I've seen people become shift manager and lose their shit power-tripping.

The consolidation of wealth/power (which are synonymous anyways) is super dangerous and getting worse.

Aside- Yongyea used a word in a video today I hadn't heard in so long it legitimately worried me- 'profiteering'. It perfectly describes our entire society now, but it was frowned upon when I was younger (80s-90s).

Like calling the rich 'elite'. Our language has even been weaponized against us.

I'd say our entire society is corrupt.
I'm a bit disappointed that this doesn't work in Apple Photos. The app does a fairly good job at recognizing photos and doing OCR, but you can't search the text.
I built the first online payment system for my university' frosh week in the early 2000's (before that they only accepted cash). This is pre-shopify/etc, and if you were doing any moderate volume it was worthwhile to use a gateway that went direct to your own merchant account.

They started accepting signups a couple weeks before school started, and on the second day it was running, after several hundred signups (of ~$200 each iirc), apparently some security people from the bank showed up at the orientation office at the school basically just to confirm it was legit. (I don't remember if they suspended the account first or not)

I had built a few online store sites using merchant accounts by then, but nothing that went from zero to that volume so quickly; it was fascinating to see that check in action.

I wonder what volume it would take to trigger such scrutiny today, and what it would look like..
> why even pay attention?

Tesla's Autopilot feature compels you to pay attention. If it doesn't detect your hands on the wheels applying slight pressure, the car will nag at you, first by flashing blue on the screen, then by sounding alarms, until it does feel slight pressure on the wheel, and if you ignore that, it'll slow the car to a stop.

> The whole reason to use autopilot is to interact less with the vehicle.

According to who? Tesla? I've yet to see any documentation saying what the point of Autopilot says. The official user manual for the feature doesn't even try to explain why the feature exists.

I've used the feature in my Tesla, and frankly, it's lane aware cruise control. That's it. It in no way allows you to do other stuff. If anything, I have to interact more with my car when I'm using Autopilot.

I also think there's more to this story than just an inattentive Tesla driver ignoring their Autopilot's warnings. Especially when it happened at 1:10AM on a stretch of highway that's straight and smooth, and likely had very few other vehicles.
They really do though.
I meant they could pull a Comcast and give billions for them to do nothing. Let's not forget that after that, the government gave even more money to Comcast.
Your penis gets numb when you have a poorly fitted bike and saddle. Anyone dumb enough to continue to ride like that is welcome to take themselves out of the gene pool as far as I'm concerned.
You sit on your ischial tuberosities, not your perineum.
To be fair, the more profound a result the less math you need to convince anyone it is the case.
Right, but it doesn’t seem like it’s not a free market, there doesn’t sound like there’s legislation protecting these companies. Unlike what EVs have has to go up against with dealerships.

Extremely poor customer experience across the board sounds ripe for disruption. Companies just don’t understand how vulnerable this makes them. There’s absolutely no loyalty or connection built with a bad customer experience.

A few years from now there will be a startup that shows us a better way and we’ll have a hard time understanding why we put up with crappy customer experience and mediocrity for so long.
https://www.theblackvault.com

Here's a good one https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/broken-arrow-i...
No. They do proper espresso style coffees with decent beans.
So all in all quite like the sprawling mansion of the same name from the Citizen Kaine film then?
The link goes to the site's homepage, not the article. The correct link should be https://lukesmith.xyz/articles/why-i-use-the-gpl-and-not-cuc...
Yep, and a lot of them lived back when being accused of heresy by the church was literally a death sentence. So again, not exactly an environment that fostered critical thinking, certainly one that punished speaking out against the church in any sort of way.

Galileo, for example, was condemned on his death bed by the pope and buried in an unceremoniously small room next to the novice's chapel for almost 100 years before he was reburied in the main basilica[0] .

0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei#Death
Think of Kubernetes like a single application. The config files are the source for that application, the running cluster is the compiled application running on the users computer. By default Helm injects more "compiled" code unrelated to your applications source into the running application. Allowing any tool to alter active cluster state diffuses your single source of truth, your source code, to multiple sources of truth which will not remain in sync with your source unless great care is taken. Moving in sync matters, because that is how you roll back to a known good state when things break.

If you are using Helm to generate source code for your application you still have the added complexity of additional build step, but at least you can choose to add the generated code to your app in a way that tracks with the rest of your code.

Also most Helm chart authors are of varying skill level, and even skilled ones necessarily make incorrect assumptions about your deployment environment. It takes a lot of addition code in helm charts to support more flexibility, so it often get ignored, and you are left with a black box that doesn't quite do what you'd want it to do.
Well if we fucked the environment up to get into this problem I guess we can fuck up the environment to get out of it
I've revised my comment a little. Yes, it's definitely possible. The example that comes to my mind now is the guy who runs Krita, which is a project with huge scope, but I think that to do this effectively requires a high level of discipline and patience that many people don't have and that is difficult to test for when hiring, which is why companies are forced to turn to bureaucracy instead.
> This will fundamentally be up to the author's git skill whether or not they are presenting the PRs to reviewers / mergers as stacked. If they're skilled git users there's little to no cost presenting them one at a time and keeping the not-yet-PRd branches fresh.

On multiple teams I've worked on, this has been explicitly discouraged because reviewers often want to see the changeset in as much context as is available, including future changesets.
Reconfigurable Asynchronous Logic Automata [pdf]
Big data is now big tata.
Plus, if you drive it into thermal throttling then it will do less, like good old prof said.
> cannot possibly be that detrimental to battery life

Know anything about batteries? There are other ways of determining remaining battery capacity, but most popularly it is determined by testing voltage, which itself can be split into two methods: testing voltage under load and testing voltage not under load. Testing voltage under load takes energy. Testing voltage not under load will also take energy (if the tester is built in to the device, which it is) but not as much, though testing not under load is not nearly as reliably accurate as testing voltage under load.

So, in fact, not only possibly, but definitely, checking battery life is always detrimental to battery life because it takes power to check voltage under load to produce battery life data, and that power comes from the battery's remaining capacity.
> it was a raging conspiracy theory

Sure, but is it false?

> From what I've heard, the theory is largely discredited now.

If you say so.
I tried it, requires no buy in, pretty much everything still properly shows up in GitHub.
This document was declassified in 2011; it was published in 1949.
It might be a silly question since I know little about this tool but I didn't see a mention of docker-compose in the FAQ: do you have personal experience with use-cases where multiple volumes might need to be mounted, ports forwarded, and multiple containers talking to each others or depending on each others?
I've checked with ClickHouse and the result is better than I expect... it runs in 0.043 sec. on my machine, which is faster than any other result.

The code:

SELECT arrayJoin(splitByChar(' ', lower(line))) AS word, count() AS c FROM file('kjvbible.txt', LineAsString) WHERE notEmpty(word) GROUP BY word ORDER BY c DESC FORMAT Null

or:

clickhouse-local --query "SELECT arrayJoin(splitByChar(' ', lower(line))) AS word, count() AS c FROM file('kjvbible.txt', LineAsString) WHERE notEmpty(word) GROUP BY word ORDER BY c DESC" > /dev/null

It is using only a single thread.
It's interesting, because this was reported out in 1993, and includes things like:

Similarly, the telephone grid is scanned at a rate exceeding one million calls per minute for conversation suspected of being useful to the IRA. The moment a trigger word or phrase is uttered, the line is tapped and a detective put on the case. My Belfast friends keep correcting my perception of this snooping. [...]

How plausible was that in 1993? Scanning dialed numbers, sure, but voice recognition?
IMHO idiomatic defensive coding is very hard.
> which I think is wrong for the standard cosmology.

I have no idea why you would think that, since the very paper you link to explicitly shows diagrams in which the Big Bang is obviously not a single point but a spacelike line.

> Why would (cosmological) t=0 be a line rather than a point, a 3-volume, or some even weirder non-Lorentzian structure?

Because that's what you get when you take the appropriate limit.

> Obviously I've seen Penrose diagrams with the BB drawn out to look like a horizontal line, but have never taken that to be anything other than for legibility or print-reproducibility reasons, similar to the dimensional reduction of the diagram itself.

You are mistaken. The point of a Penrose diagram is to show causal structure; that is how it is constructed, so that light cones on the diagram exactly match light cones in the spacetime it's a diagram of. That means that if it were really true that the entire universe was in the future light cone of the Big Bang, the Big Bang would have to be a point, and the diagram as a whole would be an inverted triangle that was the future light cone of that point. Which obviously is not the case for Penrose diagrams of the universe as a whole.

As for "published authority", as I noted above, you gave one yourself: the Davis & Lineweaver paper. It agrees with what I have been saying, not with what you have been saying.

> I agree that in the standard cosmology there are an infinite number of causally disconnected points one "instant" after the Big Bang

Then you are contradicting yourself, since this is impossible if the Big Bang is a point. It is only possible if the Big Bang is a spacelike line.

> but don't see how that can't follow from the standard BB singularity.

It does. The issue is not "the standard BB singularity", but your mistaken belief that that singularity is a point. It's not. It's a spacelike line.
> From what I've heard, the theory is largely discredited now.

Are there any reliable modern historians that have written about this? Especially the bit that says he was a serial killer in his early years.
> I get the point that psychiatrists wanted to avoid over-diagnosing/over-prescribing

But that isn't the point. The point was to prevent people from engaging in pathological behavior by pointing out that that's not something you should do. It's an obvious-but-shouldn't-be-necessary correction to the earlier state where people were admired for being dysfunctional.
Thank you for the coherent defense of a pan-African-American broad affirmative action. I haven't seen that argument made clearly before.
> a BC universe

What is a BC universe?
A profile on Xi while he was Vice President of the PRC https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09BEIJING3128_a.html
How to Temporarily Disable Face ID and Require a Passcode to Unlock Your iPhone
Maybe tens of hundreds of officers listening to multiple calls?
I forgot to multiply the file 10 times.
When I do, the result is 0.209 sec. which is still better than every other result.
Thank you for the article. That was up my alley.
> For example, why would I want to spend time learning deeply how to write my own compiler, vs just spending that time to do tutorials for a couple different new frameworks?

I feel I can answer that easily:

Writing a compiler is vastly more interesting and satisfying!

Learning new frameworks, how boring. I'll do it for pay or prospects.

Writing compilers, now that I'll do for free on the evenings and weekends. You cannot pry my fingers from the keyboard when I'm on a compiler roll! Important household tasks will go neglected! Someone should remind me to eat!

I feel I speak for many here on HN with this sentiment. (See also database engines and distributed systems.)

To put it back on topic: Some things are intrinsically rewarding. It feels good to go deep with them, especially to advance them in some way. That's the payoff. I think this is a significant driving factor in the expansion of human knowledge; it's not just driven by economic incentives to learn things, although economic limitations do prevent people from having capacity to go deep into things they'd like to
Stacked PRs are an indicator of an incompletely thought out approach to the implementation. Prefer sequential PRs that layer in the implementation: test code, interfaces/API stubs, and then concrete implementations of the stubs (for example). This tends to make PRs less complex and more inviting for colleagues to review, which in my experience tends to make them go much faster. It also leads to generally better code quality.
I use ripgrep all the time but I sometimes don't trust the results and I have been bitten too many times by heuristics it automatically uses to detect binary files and skip searching into those. These days I run ripgrep with alias `rg --color always --no-mmap -a` but still I think its binary file detection is wonky. I might be missing some relevant option but out of box - IMO grep is slower but always does what is told (and hence more reliable).
Break-even according to one study is 22.5 books over the lifetime of an ereader.[1]

I found a separate source estimating that a paper book (typical) has a CO2 offset of about 2.6 kg CO2. I think that's just production costs, but just considering those, it takes only on the order of 50 books over the lifetime of a device to break even. Once you factor in CO2 output from the supply chain and more dwelling space to accommodate more bookshelves, break-even is probably in the neighborhood of the study's figure.

There are other reasons that's probably not a fair comparison. Ereaders seem to increase people's book consumption. Reading means not doing things like driving around for entertainment, so buying an ereader even to read books you already have might be a net positive on CO2 output.

[1] https://www.cnet.com/culture/study-paints-kindle-e-reader-a-...
Shaming people for making a light joke and applying critical thinking. Lovely. This is why we can't have nice things, asshole.

Also, why are you worried about objectification? It's a comic book. Everything about it is a cartoon. It's ALL objectification. Have some perspective.

Nevertheless, my point stands, another way you could deal with this issue is to just think about something other than breasts for once in your life.
At GRIT, we believe people look for opportunities instead of jobs in this new era of work. We focus on in-demand Digital and Technology roles, where we intelligently match outstanding talents to some of the most groundbreaking companies in the industry. Our clients will spend less time and funds filling crucial positions with our pre-screened talents and high response rates from candidates. Our team works as an extension of your own.
That article doesn’t mention fit

For example, a lot of my shirts are from surf/skate brands because they tend to fit me better

I generally hate Gildan shirts because I find them super boxy and short
They won't plan to build 11. There's years between approval and earth being turned on the couple they do decide to build.
You can - trackers are absolutely a thing, and historically tended to be used a lot. Back when solar was $10/W. Adding even $5/W for tracker structure and equipment was far cheaper than additional solar panels.

Now, with panels sub-$0.50/W, you can accomplish the same thing (more power) for far less money by just putting more panels on. You get less production per nameplate panel watt, but the total system costs are usually lower. And you can push your DC:AC ratios pretty high if you want - cap your inverter out on sunny days, but still get more power on cloudy days. It just depends on what you're trying to optimize for.

I still see trackers on occasion - they're cool. But the only place they're useful is if you have some stiff limit on nameplate capacity. Out here, you're limited to a 25kW system for residential, and you can't exceed your local transformer capacity in panel area - not inverter output (why, I have no idea, I've gotten a range of BS reasons that mostly center around somehow changing the system, blowing up the transformer, and then the power company being on the hook for a new transformer). So if you want to run a large "residential" site (think a ranch or something like that with a bunch of outbuildings), you can hit the 25kW limit quickly, and then need to go to a tracker to increase kWh generated on your 25kW system.

But outside edge cases like that, just put more panels on. The systems I'm helping people with are mostly A-frames, with east-west facing panels for long solar days, and a fairly high DC/AC ratio. I've got 7kW of panel on 6kW of inverter, though I rarely see the inverter past 4500W, which is by design - I don't like pegging out power electronics for long periods of time, and prefer to run things at 80% of design load or lower for longevity reasons.
Different merchant underwriters have different processes. Visiting merchant locations was pretty common, usually just to check if it looks like a real operating business though.
It means the power plants are over capacity is all.
Google Chrome security update fixes 'high risk' flaws
> Relativity allows some physical distributions of stress-energy to pick out a meaningful set of coordinates.

More precisely, with certain distributions of stress-energy, computations become much simpler in particular coordinates. But that does not mean the coordinates have any physical meaning. If there are any actual invariant properties of the spacetime that particular coordinates make more evident, those properties can always be expressed in coordinate-independent terms, for example in terms of Killing vector fields.

> (as has been known in cosmology for many years. cf. <https://arxiv.org/abs/1211.6338> §2 notably p 4)

I don't see anything in that paper that supports any claim stronger than the one I agreed to above. If you think you do, please give a specific quote.
Thanks, I wanted to compare it to another electric car but didn't get to it yet
Consider that authors so beloved that they have a fan base, and their associated works, are in fact because the works are beloved as-is. Adaptation will always require some adjustment based on the resultant medium, but that's where the adaptor needs to be very sure-footed in what makes a beloved work beloved. Sure, you can never please everyone. If an author of a book does not describe in precise detail what a character looks like, the reader will fill in something, and that something will be different for every reader.

However! When adapting a beloved novel (and here is where I get blasted for isms), if the author did in fact choose to describe physical attributes of characters, environmental and scenic settings, etc. and the adaptation is intentionally different, it will (regardless of intent) not be true to the original. Purists and fans don't often like this. Sometimes it works, but it's a big gamble.

Plenty of excuses for why this happens. Modernizing dialogue, forced or expected ethnic/sexual diversity, "they embody the character regardless of appearance", or as often comes up with fantasy/sci-fi/fiction-in-general, "it's not real so it doesn't matter if it changes" (though BBC productions seem intent on treating well documented real history as fiction for some reason).

Look, it's OK to have diversity on camera and stories. It's fine and welcomed. But... if the original was specific about a character's depiction, be respectful of that regardless of whether you agree with why. Sure, Jane Austen might have been a terrible racist who wouldn't have ever considered an Asian character, and maybe an Asian actor embodies the character better than anyone else. That still isn't honest to the material, and people know it, it takes them out of it.

"Why is there a Japanese woman in this historical context? Why does Anne Boleyn have dark skin and clear African origins when all contemporary accounts and depictions of her describe her as pale and from Northern climes?"

In sum and at great risk of sounding like a racist bigot blah blah incel 4channer etc.: if you want ethnic and sexual and [other] diversity and modern concepts, make your own stories.