skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Not nearly as bad in my book as the despicable people who haphazardly give access to their contacts. I don't care if you dox yourself.
I subscribe to “computers are bad” newsletter, but didn’t get this one in the mail for some reason. Like always, fascinating, obscure, and dryly humorous. Thanks for posting it.
That's why it's selling for so cheap. Probably overpriced.
what's the complaint with msg? have never heard anyone complain about that, although as a kid with all the "no msg" signs at Chinese restaurants and no other context I thought of it as something similar to MDMA or LSD.
Nah… this stuff happens, unfortunately.

There’s no need to blast off into conspiracy space.
It's time for WASM and Rust. DOM tools can render to their own optimized GPU-accelerated canvas and ditch DOM outright.
If I search for "walmart 24 hours", I get a list of closed bakeries.
Robot clearly doesn't understand en passant.
Exactly. My brother was recently shopping for two devices, and he considered Mac laptops, iPads, Windows laptops, Windows tablets, and Chromebooks. For him, it was just a question of what would allow his family to (1) watch TV, (2), surf the web, (3) do email, and (4) back up other devices. In the end he got one iPad and one MBA, though he seriously considered Windows alternatives.
James Bond villains were often seen petting a cat. I'm sure they'd be great on a date.
I actually think everyone should track what they eat, at least for a while. It's a really interesting experience. I started because I wanted to lose weight but was exercising a lot, so I was restricting my calories while trying to keep protein high. It didn't take long to realise that I had previously had little to no idea of what I was putting in my mouth, and tracking for a while (probably ~3 months minimum) gives you a much better intuition.

After doing this for a while I started developing stomach problems (unrelated to my change in diet), and I needed to ensure that I was meeting my minimum requirements for fibre too. All of a sudden you end up with quite a tricky multi-dimensional optimisation problem, and it was actually quite a fun intellectual exercise trying to meet all the constraints, obviously without hating what I ate.

There are all sorts of reasons that you might want to minimise or maximise some micro- or macro-nutrient. Any athlete will want some sort of control of what they eat. Perhaps you want more magnesium for better sleep, and you'd like to get it from actual food rather than supplements. Calorie restriction while keeping protein high is a common one for losing weight. Almost no-one eating a western diet gets anywhere near enough fibre, and any one of various health scares might make you aware of that. Tracking what you eat permanently is a serious commitment that is probably unnecessary for most people, but I think it's a good thing to try, at least for a while. I tend to go back to tracking periodically when I want to get some aspect of my diet under control, but I don't do it all the time.
Understanding Insomnia
That channel iluomo is the 40th channel ever to be created on youtube if you believe the about page.
However the channel was created on Apr 30, 2005 which could track for the 40th channel.
I suspect this 666 and 69 channel redirect, and yop/iluomo, are legacy site exploits/easter eggs from the actual original developers of Youtube.
yop/iluomo also had various other easter eggs through the years, like this one.
https://www.reddit.com/r/TimeworksSubmissions/comments/oidgv...

Anyone else got anything interesting to add about this?
edit:exploit is a better word for this, as easter egg implies something else entirely
If you think people only care about the next 3-5 years, unequivocally, then your knowledge on how people invest is questionable. Long term investing (10+ years) is an absolutely massive industry.

The market works in approximately 10 year cycles. Invest long term, ignore short term sideshows. It's simple, even a layperson can do it.
Renting cars for the weekend is a PITA. Most people I know in cities would rather just own them.

And make living in cities sufficiently unpleasant or incinvenientand people who can will just leave as they did in the 70s and 80s.
Wow this is familiar, good to have them collected in one place, and I wonder if it's a coherent system?

Like, I wonder if one anti practice leads to the next?
> But that safety comes in large parts from strict regulations which have made nuclear power very expensive.

Nonsense. The strict regulations are why there have been two nuclear starts in the USA since 1978.
Unless I am misunderstanding your point and you're saying there's evidence supporting the negative effects of non-sugar sweeteners for obese people, isn't this a classic case of correlation vs. causation, where observation X is seen as "ample evidence" of causation while it's merely correlated?

The kind of person that'll happily drink a bucket of soda (diet or otherwise) is likely the kind of person that has an unhealthy relationship with food in the first place, with a stomach (appetite?) capable of ingesting a lot of food and liquid. Which is a category morbidly obese people fall under.
Good to see that Godwin [1] holds.

The answer is yes, absolutely.

And I'd happily engage you to try to convince and educate you, in a respectful way, why I believe that's incorrect.

Because that's how we raise ourselves up.

Censoring, reviling, shutting down and abandoning people who hold these sorts of beliefs only serves to reinforce them and drive them into echo chambers of radicalization.

So yes, by all means. Express any thoughts, ideas, opinions or dreams you have.

By actively participating in the marketplace of ideas, we can let the best ones rise, and the worst ones defeat themselves.

Through discussion and debate, not force or cooersion, of which censorship is an insidious form.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
You might be right. One thing is for sure though, if they actually like cats I assume this would be a big attractor. To flip the script, i'd 10x prefer a profile photo if it had a cat, given I like cats. Of course the two cats would also need to get along. Double date I guess.
It’s America and it’s about race because if you look like the people this country historically extracted free labor from, then you are much more likely to be treated poorly for profit. Being poor is different than being poor and black or latino in America. Our livelihoods ride on the manufactured failure of specific groups of people for political reasons. Then here you come calling it all poor people, erasing the specific struggles that enable the system. If you are going to argue on behalf of white people, which ones? What are the lineages of people who were affected most? Who cause the harm? Was redress made?

American Descendents of Slavery haven’t gotten their reparations yet, and LatAm is still an American-managed cluster fuck.
I don't think that's a balanced summary of the study.

"Results from prospective cohort studies suggest the possibility of
long-term harm in the form of increased risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes,
cardiovascular diseases and mortality."

And regarding the short-term weight loss, the confounding factor of
reduction in sugar and overall energy intake seems to be the explanation.

The "Concluding Remarks" section of the paper is a good, and very brief, encapsulation of the results.
The intended beneficiary of public transportation is, well, the public. That includes people whose presence might make you uncomfortable. Those people exist, and they have the same right to use the system that you do. This is fundamentally an issue that law enforcement cannot solve.

Also, for what it's worth: as someone who uses the NYC subway extensively, it does not feel unsafe.
I'm not buying an ARM laptop or an x86 laptop, I'm buying a laptop that lets me get work done. Both types do the work I need, the Apple one currently does it nicer at a good price point. If the x86 laptops start doing it better than I'd pick one of those.
The reasoning and examples here are so badly cherry-picked that I am thinking of paying $3 per box. Yes, some people do succeed but that does not make it true for everyone.
A can of soft drink every two days seems highly unhealthy to me.
"Day cares should be safe for children"

"OMG did you just use the 'think of the children' fallacy??? Invalid!"
Please correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t it impossible for fusion to generate a nuclear meltdown scenario that fission has the potential for?
I'm using Clojure at my day job as well. Though, my employer is not on the list there.
Genuine question: is Tesla’s autopilot crashing more often or more severely than human drivers?
It breaks fingers with 10 thou of repeatability
>“There’s a huge opportunity in electric vehicles (EVs) and particularly electric buses because integration of our dehumidifiers in their air conditioning systems can extend their driving ranges by up to 75 percent,”

so its a scam then, ok
I have also noticed a kind of implosion happening - an emptying-out of real human-generated thoughts and content. I have hypotheses but they would be considered highly "ideological" in this forum.
It's also impossible to do this on almost every other substance we use. I'll focus my energy on avoiding things we know for sure are problematic like refined sugar and get to artificial sweeteners when everything else more important is solved.
twitter is a great example of phone number verification doing fuck all against bots
There are in fact times when we need to think about children. If we don't, humanity won't have much of a future.
Also posted a couple days ago (with only a handful of comments) as https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32187369 (in case anyone wants to read those).
“Burning Ship” fractal
I know and I agree but as an interviewer who is on the front lines (I’m the first interviewer after the HR screening) I have to conduct live coding challenges (but I go out of my way to put the candidate at ease; I mention we are colleagues and that I’m not trying to trip them up but they I think of it more as a pair programming thing and that they can use Google and ask questions or ask for hints etc etc) to weed out those that embellish or exaggerate their skills. I’ve found it has worked: someone that sounded amazing and said all the right things in the screener wasn’t able to do the equivalent of a fizzbuzz for data engineers and we avoided hiring someone who is junior for a senior role. (We do then consider these folks — depending if we think they were lying or just over eager — to come in as junior engineers if they want, though, so that’s something.)
It certainly has been pumping some iron.
Like gift horses?
> Claiming that laws specifically targeting women's bodies are not about sexism at all is what looks like grasping at straws to me.

Nope. You need to understand the difference between "law affecting women because the matter in question is women" and "law affecting women because somebody wants to hurt women specifically". The abortion regulation can not be not about women (weird exceptions excluded) - it doesn't mean it is based only on the desire to subjugate and oppress women, this is just a stupid take that reduces everything to a bumper sticker.

> and they will in fact die because of these laws.

Nope, they won't. Idaho GOP position is not the law and I don't think it's likely it will become the law. The actual law is different and does not preclude pregnancy termination if it is necessary for saving woman's life. Women may die because they would make a decision due to these laws - e.g. to seek an illegal and unsafe abortion instead of, e.g., carrying to term and giving the child for adoption - but there would be always conscious choice and action involved. Again, you are confusing regulation that concerns women - because, obviously, any abortion regulation would - and one that is designed to hurt women, which it is not.

> I highly doubt the majority of women agree with that, even in Idaho.

I do not know about the majority, but I am sure some do. In any case, again, the reason why they take this position is not because they hate women, and until you realize that, you won't understand anything about their positions. Maybe you don't want to, but I am here to tell you your position is wrong. Maybe you don't care to know the truth - that's also your choice.
I have no idea why, but it seems like software engineering salaries in the UK (from what I've seen in job listings for remote work as an American) are near the lowest in the first world (yes, even when adjusting for GBP/USD exchange rate).
I love visual math like this so much. I had a professor at my alma mater, UC Santa Cruz, who made a textbook called “Illustrated Theory of Numbers”, and it’s just beautiful. Marty Weissman, check it out sometime
Well the byte stream includes everything you throw in (TCP/UDP/L2), so while the tunnel will not suffer from any signaling issues in the payload flow, the opposite is not true - the internal traffic is affected by any TCP problems on the SSH tunnel so a short blip on the tunnel can cause a cascade of blips depending on whats in there.
Update: upon submitting an appeal to YouTube I got a response within 24 hours saying "We have re-reviewed your account and have concluded that it is not in violation of our Terms of Service. Therefore, we have unsuspended your account."

So now you can watch the video :)
https://youtu.be/HBk-0wRGqHY

Thank you all for the tips
> Rayiner, I have the conventional, non-Twitter non-message-board definition of racism, the same definition I'd get from a random person I stopped on the street.

I'm not using a novel definition of racism here. Promoting racialization (categorizing people into different races), and treating people differently based on their race--both under the law, through racial preferences, and socially, through DEI--is racism. And Democrats do it much more than Republicans.

> So, no, I'd ask you to try again to square the Republican party of Paul Gosar and Steve King against a Democratic party that has none of those figures.

The Republican Party has some racists. In the case of Steve King, the party stripped him of his committee assignments and he lost his seat.

The Democratic Party is engaged in a fundamentally racist project of co-opting minority identities to advance the ideology of white liberals. It starts with promoting racial identity in schools, focused on an oppression narratives. "Asian studies" curricula, for example, focus on discrimination against Chinese Americans in the 1800s (people few Asian Americans trace their ancestry to), instead of for example the rapid upward mobility of Vietnamese, Koreans, and Indians in the 1960s and 1970s (which many Asian Americans today do trace their ancestry to). It continues to Democrat-dominated educational and professional institutions that center people's race and expressly treat them differently based on it.

The fact that it's a paternalistic sort of racism--Democrats think they're helping--doesn't change the fact that it's racism. At the end of the day, all of this is to advance the agenda of white Democrats. That's quite apparent when any non-white Democratic group diverges from white Democrats either out of cultural differences or divergent interests (e.g. Asian Americans when it comes to color-blind metrics or Black Americans when it comes to religion).
Quite the contrary, I think. Society has become "soft", for lack of better words. If we had been so risk-averse centuries ago, the industrial revolution would have never happened.
I have so many questions.

1.) What organizer/parent in their right mind thought that this was a good idea. Never place humans within the reach of industrial robots. He's lucky to have only broken a finger.

2.) Why make a robot pick up the pieces? Handling movement of chess pieces by a computer has been done safely since the early 1980's by Milton Bradley.

3.) Was the boy actually playing against a computer player? If so, why? Computers are already much better than humans and have nothing left to prove in the chess arena. If he's playing a human why is a human not moving the pieces?
I live in south-eastern Canada today it was 35C which is something I've never seen here. And the humidity at one point was 90% which is typical since I am on an island. Thankfully it went to about 70%.

I felt tired it wears you out even 35C is OK but any humidity over 60% is terrible. My entire childhood up until ten years ago a 30C day here was a very hot day that came maybe once per summer but most years never.
If your website is commercial in nature then it can help to get rid of the buzzwords such as 'SEO' and 'accessibility' to just think of putting the customer first.

In a real retail business, what would you do for customers that needed some type of assistance, whether reading labels or navigating the store? Hopefully you would help them out as needed with a customer first ethos and not treat them as 'disabled'. If anything, their money is going to be yours quicker than with those 'able bodied' customers because you have gone out of your way to help them.

Chipping away at the 'accessibility' of a website, there is a long way to go before getting the 'aria' properties right on every link. Text might be below the size Google deems 'accessible'. Making that text big and chunky might upset designers who want the customer to be browsing by pictures not words. If you argue the case from an accessibility viewpoint they are imagining wheelchairs and they don't see their customers that way. However, if you can argue 'putting customers first' floats their boat. "Won't have text too small for Google" and "so the typical customer can read the text" is still about accessibility but you are not using the 'a' word.

For me the fun in accessibility is this word play, to persuade a wider team that has its own inertia and SEO religion to 'put the customer first'.
"Alcubierre": to track progress on warp drives
I don't know about other people, but being treated differently based on your race doesn't actually make me feel better just because the other person thinks they're helping.
"up to" means it can be as little as 0%. Not sure where the scam is.
"Lisp"
didnt you read the scamvertis^^^article?

“There’s a huge opportunity in electric vehicles (EVs) and particularly electric buses because integration of our dehumidifiers in their air conditioning systems can extend their driving ranges by up to 75 percent,” said Matt Jore, CEO of Montana Technologies.

__extend their driving ranges by up to 75 percent__
Probably a high percentage of diabetics, type 1 and 2.
I think that I don't agree with this, entirely.

Most, if not all, meaningful speech risks offending someone.

Framing uncomfortable beliefs as attacks grants a form of "victim power" by which anyone can claim to be a victim of your "attack" as a means of shutting down speech.

This isn't a hypothetical, I see the technique used frequently.
I'm sorry, I don't follow. But I am interested in understanding if you could expand.
Can you show us such evidence?
“JavaScript malware” using Google Scholar and Google Alert.
Which all caused an amazingly high suicide rate that definitely did not "save the man". Never mind the number of children killed at the boarding schools[0,1].

Now, we are dealing with elders dying (even when fully vaccinated[2]) that has created holes in our language, history, and cultural teachings. We have been trying for years to document everything, but living examples are so much better.

0) https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/indian-boarding-school-... - 'The report notes the investigation will likely "reveal the approximate number of Indian children who died at Federal Indian boarding schools to be in the thousands or tens of thousands.”'

1) https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-57325653

2) Tribe paid everyone $500 to get vaccinated - that did an amazing job
> In the minds of potential investors, fusion is no longer a "lol maybe in 50 years" technology.

No. Potential investors are used to extremely skewed investments results for startups. Most startups fail, but some of those that succeed, succeed spectacularly.

A successful fusion startup is almost guaranteed to have a spectacular success, something that would make Facebook or Uber or Tesla look like small potatoes. Given that, a VC is ok with investing in it even if they think the likelihood of success is only 1%. They would not if they think that likelihood is only 0.01%, because at that level estimates are not reliable (who's to say it's 0.01% and not 0.00001% ?). But if there's a reasonable argument that P(success) ~ 1%, then it's a no-brainer to invest, because even a mistake of 2 orders of magnitude would still result in a positive return.

For the rest of us though, the "fusion is 50 years in the future" can simply be replaced with "there's a 99% chance fusion will not be done in the next 50 years". Or, what the heck, just leave it at "fusion is 50 years in the future" and you'll be much more right than wrong.
I believe pixz adds a file index when compressing tar files. It’s definitely much, much faster at extracting a single file from a large archive compared to a tar file compressed with gzip or zstd.
It’s not the Sri Lanka “ban all fertilizer” approach, and North American farmers use far too much fertilizer anyway, but any mandated reduction in fertilizer use (directly or indirectly as in this case - the farmers aren’t the ones designing or creating fertilizer) needs to include mandatory production tracking to verify it hasn’t caused any significant reduction - although who knows how you fix that retroactively
> Having an affair with his best friend's wife.

Was that also part of his profound wisdom? kek

Thank you for the summary. The quotes certainly resonate.
You can also bank some reproductive tissue. It's roughly $1300 for collection, shipment, and 5 years of storage.

I'm familiar with and can recommend Reprotech [1], but any reputable firm will do. You can even establish a trust to manage your tissue beyond death.

(all of this is moot if non-reproductive specific cells can be coaxed into healthy reproductive tissue in the future [2])

[1] https://www.reprotech.com/

[2] https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/oct/14/scientists-c...
Yeah, that battery life and fan noise.

The PR around apple products is hilarious.
AGI alignment is a vastly bigger problem. Of course poorly built and deployed ML systems will kill and injure people - but these are tragedies of the kind humanity can endure and overcome and has overcome. Poorly aligned AGI is nothing less than the entire species at stake.
You might be interested in Linen (https://www.linen.dev/) which aims to make Slack and Discord communities Google-Searchable. I cannot attest its effectiveness, but I figure it seems relevant.
> unsweetened

Unsweetened generally still means it. The weasel words I usually see are "no added sugar". The ingredients will then list juice concentrates, stevia, or monkfruit.
Damn, this is terrible.

> Until now, these network operators did not interfere in the transmission and merely forwarded the data.

As it should be!
I believe pixz was created to solve the exact problem you have just described. For xz/lzma compression at least.
The biggest question that I have with people that I talked about is if the noun is masculine or feminine ("O pendrive" or "A pendrive"?)
Sure there is, like if you move a piece, hit the clock, then realise your piece wasn't quite centered on the square. Maybe not technically correct, but reasonable.
What does OP mean forecasting as an alternative to estimation?
> Do similar social concepts exists?

Any youtube content makes me feel I'm a 5 y.o. but with ability to buy.

> Could we use NLP to analyze ELI5 answers and deduct patterns?

No, computers can not do any semantic analisys currently.
Why is it children injured by robots who need to toughen up rather than the people nostalgic for a past they never experienced?
Please post your tale of SSHFP in a new thread, sounds interesting.
Now it broke a finger, which sucks, but’ll heal. But what if it had taken out an eye?
Or Orbot: https://guardianproject.info/apps/org.torproject.android/