skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Whether or not they get the smaller units in stock, I don't have to let them into my house to install it, nor will a new owner of the home be expected to pay the difference between the 40 and 45. It's a permanent fixture. As is a battery in an electric car.
Home Office just means something very different these days. Stop watching, we work good, ok?
I agree completely. I think it works much better if you've played the original, then took some time to go back and play the new content. Otherwise some of its commentary about sequels (reviews, rose-tinted glasses, etc) kind of loses its "punch".
It didn't need to be fixed, though. It's as if they consider it a moral error -- can't be giving free stuff out, ya know! The money was spent long ago, so the fix didn't save Tesla any money, no recurring costs, etc. It was purely a "fuck you" move, and any halfway competent employee should have seen this shitstorm coming a mile away.
Demeo and Echo Arena are great if you have friends that also have a Quest 2 you can play with. I'm past the age where I want want to risk the enjoyment of my limited gaming time to the random match maker gods.
I'll second this; while I haven't played them myself, I've watched playthroughs of all three of them, and they really do an amazing job of blurring the line between the player's character and the real-life person playing the game. Combined with having some hidden secrets being only unlockable by doing real-world things outside the game, it's hard for to decide whether he's basically created a new art form that transcends the game genre or just has gotten everyone who's played the game essentially to join a sort of AR/roleplaying game of which his video games are just some of the pieces.
If you're writing your own compiler, I don't think the Ferrocene specification will help you.

It's basically an old version of the Rust Reference written out in a more bureaucratic manner.

(I see a little new material, such as the Name Resolution subsection, but even that is incomplete and I think wrong.)

Neither of these things is anywhere near close enough to being complete and correct to implement a compiler against.
I run an email marketing database. You might be pleased to know we keep a little "wall of honor" of the best fake emails we've been given.
Google Workspace makes money from Gmail by charging business users for it. Gmail is the freemium version to make employees demand their employers buy Workspace over Office 365.

It's a similar model to GitHub.
People don't understand that google is first and foremost an identification service.
I honestly want to see this taken to court, it would be an interesting case.

I mean I'm not convinced at all what Tesla did is even lawful. To me, it seems like Tesla and the owner came to a mutual agreement repairing warranty service years earlier, and Tesla's only real arguments is that that either the customer agreed to the downgrade happening eventually (probably not true) or that they didn't understand they were giving the customer all this capacity (maybe?), but I don't think that in turn gives them the right to sabotage a car arbitrarily without notice to remediate this. I think they have an obligation to restore the status quo before the sabotage.
I meant access to your bank account -- in the context of the thread above --, not to computer account on your private or corporate computer.

At least in Europe, it is not even bank's initiative, it is from above them. They've got PSD2 directive to implement. And when they all have to implement it, is kind of difficult to vote with your wallet.
I would also like to know :D
> Working on margin is the exact opposite of overcollateralization

Not really. Margin purchasing requires less than 100% collateral to assets. Crypto overcollateralisation is more akin to borrowing against securities. I can do this around 3 to 4% for up to 30% of my account value. If I had more capital, the rates would be less.
Only got $150 for mine last week after dodging scammers on fb marketplace. Wished I woulda waited!
I like many things Gitlab does: open-sources most of their product, publishes their documentation openly, promotes remote work.

I strongly dislike some of the things that Github does: suck up open-source code and re-sell it through Copilot, stifle competition by offering free services that their non-MS-owned competitors can't afford to offer.

I don't think either one is purely good or purely evil. Overall, I like both companies better than average, but I'd rather support Gitlab.
Eh, I still use a Rift I bought off a friend, which requires a USB3 and HDMI for itself plus 3x USB3 for the base stations. While this is a tragically more complicated setup than I'd like, and getting all three base stations to behave was painful, I can't say that the cables themselves have really given me any trouble.
With all the built-in support for CI, I'm not sure how CircleCI is even operating anymore.
Interesting comparision given didn't Nvidia sell people some 30xx series graphics cards and then limit their has rate with a driver update! Giving a situation were some people brought a card for X ability of the card for an update to artificially limit it?
All upgrades stay with the car unless the used car dealer is Tesla themselves.
What does the CLOUD ACT do?
That isn't universal. There are places which have no stamping machines anymore. Because any ticket, be it bought at a ticket machine, or the driver, already is "stamped". There may be some leftover installs in older vehicles, on lend from somewhere, or occassional use out of the "Verkehrsverbund", to be lended elsewhere, but they are getting rare. I actually can't remember when I've last seen them.
> when is the last time a call to a lawyer fixed anything within any kind of quick turn time?

This May when my landlord was taking a piss with his obligations.

A single letter set him staight real fast.
Tesla buying experience is way better but the ETAs are famously off. Mine has been pushed back 4-5 times and always about 3-4 weeks before it's due to get delivered, so it's impossible to plan around.
Well said as usual, PragP.

My experience working in big tech is that the bar for actually getting an interview for the junior positions is actually relatively low, and your standardized interview performance matters 10x more than the content of your resume. Some people apply for L3 out of college, some people after many years of experience. I’ve never seen someone turned down for “too much of the wrong experience”, what more often happens is that the ruts they got into from their previous job start to show and it affects their interview performance.
Well, I think the issue is, no reasonable person would consider "Tesla upgraded something under warranty" as a defect.

Here's another example: many car brands sell larger tires as a feature of upper trim models. Hypothetically, I take my car to the dealer to get new 17" wheels, but they're out; so they do the insane thing of saying "but we've got 19" wheels here, we'll throw those on free of charge". Four years later the next owner gets a knock on their door: "we got a crew out in the driveway swapping your wheels, you didn't pay for those".

This sounds insane, but I think it only sounds insane because we're talking about software vs hardware. Since its invention, humanity has had a weird stance with software; we tolerate a lot more shit, and that toleration has allowed companies to basically get away with highway robbery. Whether that's Amazon selling eBooks then revoking them years later, game companies releasing unfinished games then promising patches months later, or Tesla issuing OTA updates, it all factors down to a really similar issue in that: software has enabled companies project greed in previously impossible ways.

Maybe the previous owner misrepresented the car; or maybe they didn't, because what reasonable person would have guessed that Tesla would do this? The statement "you didn't pay for those wheels" isn't even accurate; the new buyer probably did pay for them; maybe not in this case, but hypothetically: if it looks like a P90 and quacks like a P90, its a P90, and that's the resale value. If it looks like its got 19" wheels, and it quacks like its got 19" wheels, its priced like its got 19" wheels. The buyer just didn't pay the right person.
> The problem is that every single replication implementation I've seen expects the replicas to phone home to the master copy, not for the master copy to know of the replicas and stream updates to them. This means that your bastion machine needs to be able to reach into your LAN, which defeats half the point.

You can set up a PostgreSQL replica to be driven purely off of archive logs. It does not need direct access to the source database as it can pull the archive files via read only to a third location (e.g. file server or S3) that gets pushed by the source database server. The catch is that it will only be updated when an WAL file is pushed which can be driven either by size (automatically on an "active" database) or time (every N seconds or minutes). If you're fine with potentially being a minute behind the source, you can easily set this up.
Most F# devs know some C# anyway, I don't think this is a big problem. It might be a problem if you mix C# and, IDK, Lua, but C# and F# are just good friends
The same thing occurs with Web standards.

If some old IE version did things a certain way, even the most modern browser will want to do things in a similar way to remain compatible. Therefore, the standards bodies will try to reverse-engineer the existing behaviors and then create standards based on those. That way, modern code can simply follow the spec and remain compatible.

The HTML5 parsing algorithm is an example of this. Old browsers tried to "fix" broken HTML by guessing where things like missing closing tags were supposed to go. The HTML 4 specification never described this logic, yet it was there in the wild. The new HTML 5 specification made a point of reverse-engineering the repair algorithms and actually documenting them, so now everyone can be compatible going forward, both with each other and with legacy. Just follow the spec.
The original is quite short, there's not a lot of time wasted. The decision tree is the joke, not the gags that are put in. The whole game is parodying the way that decisions are done in games. What you get at the ends of each tree are just fluff/gags. (Mostly good ones, imo)
They didn't even trade the bad PR for $4,500, they traded it for a chance at $4,500 since they don't know if the customer will pay it. This decision-making boggles my mind.

Either there are a ton of Tesla fanatics out there who will put up with a lot of dubious behavior, or Tesla is severely limiting its upside with all of their anti-customer service antics.
Just the fact that they can do this makes me not want to own a tesla.
I think this is an interesting way to look at it, and probably a good one. But it focuses only on the crypto side of web3, which to me is the least interesting part.

To be clear, I personally feel that the next generation of the Internet needs a full reboot. Web3 is the web in name only, and the ideals that crypto bros extol have been hijacked to further these currencies.

But until some separation between web3 and “the future of the open web” is clearly created, the current problems with the web3 space will continue to proliferate.
or due to the Digital Markets Act
Could you share the relevant part of the TOS here? Others may appreciate the education as well.
I think some companies just distribute cars between dealerships and let them sort it out, others allow people to actually order a car they like. I tried with Toyota, and they weren't able to get me the car I wanted or even tell me where one could be around, for months - and looks like different dealership don't talk to each other so unless I make deposit with every dealership around, I won't be able to get what I want. Subaru, OTOH, allowed me to place order for exactly the vehicle I liked and get ETA (though not a definite date, just approximate) - even though lead times are still pretty long.
This is wrong in so many levels.

What does eating Thai food have to do with anything? I sense you tried to make an analogy, but it's so obtuse I honestly can't imagine what you were thinking.

Are you honestly saying that empathy is dependent on culture or nationality? That is some pre-enlightenment thinking right there. I thought we civilized westerners had evolved towards universal empathy, all humankind is equal and all that.

You conspicuously left out one thing. It's a biggie. Proximity and culture and RACE.

I recommend you read the article I linked. If you're okay with the statements such as "they are not like the [savage middle easterners], they are blue-eyed like us", then it is an honor to be antagonized by you. I would be disgusted to have someone who thinks that agree with me.
While you don't need to study history, you should definitely read the Wikipedia article on Napoleon's invasion of Russia before starting War and Peace. Not even from an intellectual standpoint, but to just so you're not taken out of the book every other sentence by another reference to a figure or event.
The quest 3 might have eye tracking and face tracking.

"One of the things I’m really excited about for future versions is getting eye tracking and face tracking in" - Mark Zuckerberg https://uploadvr.com/zuckerberg-quest-3-4-eye-face-tracking/

Here is their tech demo for full eye and face tracking for virtual avatars:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86-tHA8F-zU
Sure, with some hackery. I'd rather pay for something that doesn't require me to work around it like that. Why pay for this in-headset computer if I'm not using it?
Just a side note: FAANG recruiters/startups spam pretty much any developer with buzzwords on their socials (LinkedIn/GH/etc). That’s not necessarily a signal you’re hirable at those companies.
Get the site onto the frontpage of HN and hug the spammers to death? I like it.
Just spent 5 minutes making a script to find all the links in this thread and then 'score' them on the number of votes. Here's all the channels with 2 or more:

6 Votes:
https://youtube.com/c/StuffMadeHere
https://youtube.com/c/PracticalEngineeringChannel
5 Votes:
https://youtube.com/c/AppliedScience
https://youtube.com/c/smartereveryday
https://youtube.com/c/3blue1brown
https://youtube.com/c/numberphile
4 Votes:
https://youtube.com/user/standupmaths
3 Votes:
https://youtube.com/c/Nighthawkinlight
https://youtube.com/c/pbsspacetime
https://youtube.com/c/inanutshell
https://youtube.com/c/AlphaPhoenixChannel
https://youtube.com/user/Computerphile
https://youtube.com/c/FoldingIdeas
https://youtube.com/user/Nerdwriter1
https://youtube.com/c/Mathologer
https://youtube.com/c/K%C3%A1rolyZsolnai
https://youtube.com/c/UndecidedMF
https://youtube.com/c/lockpickinglawyer
https://youtube.com/c/RealEngineering
https://youtube.com/c/academyofideas
https://youtube.com/user/sixtysymbols
2 Votes:
https://youtube.com/c/CNLohr
https://youtube.com/c/PhilS94
https://youtube.com/c/Wendoverproductions
https://youtube.com/c/SteveMould
https://youtube.com/c/styropyro
https://youtube.com/c/EevblogDave
https://youtube.com/c/GreatArtExplained
https://youtube.com/c/thephilosophytube
https://youtube.com/c/ContraPoints
https://youtube.com/c/patrickhwillems
https://youtube.com/c/everyframeapainting
https://youtube.com/c/LessonsfromtheScreenplay
https://youtube.com/c/ArvinAsh
https://youtube.com/watch?v=YuIIjLr6vUA
https://youtube.com/channel/UCFaYLR_1aryjfB7hLrKGRaQ
https://youtube.com/c/lexfridman
https://youtube.com/c/keenancrane
https://youtube.com/c/ScienceClicEN
https://youtube.com/c/QuantaScienceChannel
https://youtube.com/c/MentourPilotaviation
https://youtube.com/c/Aleph0
https://youtube.com/c/AndreasSpiess
https://youtube.com/c/Bigclive
https://youtube.com/c/EconomicsExplained
https://youtube.com/c/ZackFreedman
https://youtube.com/c/whatdamath
https://youtube.com/c/TimeGhost
https://youtube.com/c/HuygensOptics
https://youtube.com/c/MarcoReps
https://youtube.com/c/AdamNeely
https://youtube.com/c/TechIngredients
https://youtube.com/c/CoolWorldsLab
https://youtube.com/c/BPSspace
https://youtube.com/c/CrackingTheCryptic
https://youtube.com/c/mitocw
https://youtube.com/c/EverydayAstronaut
https://youtube.com/c/CaspianReport
https://youtube.com/c/theschooloflifetv
https://youtube.com/c/fermilab
https://youtube.com/c/Eigensteve
https://youtube.com/c/LOOKMUMNOCOMPUTER
https://youtube.com/c/loopop
https://youtube.com/c/MrCarlsonsLab
https://youtube.com/greymatter
https://youtube.com/c/CaptainDisillusion
https://youtube.com/user/aragusea
https://youtube.com/c/scishowspace
https://youtube.com/c/engineerguyvideo
https://youtube.com/c/DomainofScience
https://youtube.com/user/DeepSkyVideos
I fought through boneworks, which is stick based movement and heavy physics climbing and falling and, worst of all, jumping. I got sick a bunch. I did get over it. But by the time I did it was just more and more apparent that it was a screen in front of my face. You can't both feel like you're there and have no nausea while jumping on a button press.
Indeed. This is recapitulation of the old fight Intel got themselves into trying to implement market discrimination via selling chips that could be overclocked but setting them to underclock because it was cheaper to sell all the same chip and then underclock the ones that didn't pass their performance tests in the warehouse (or even that did, but they didn't have enough low-end chips in the pipeline) then it was to physically make multiple different dies of high and low clock chips.

Tesla installed a 90 battery because it was easier and faster to do that than wait around for a 60 battery to show up in the distribution pipeline. They then let the customer take advantage of the fact that they had given them an "overclocked" battery. Trying to force price discrimination at this point is at the very least a bad look and may actually be a violation of the law regarding principle of second sale.
Well, my comment that linked to RtR was highly voted... But now it's near the bottom and what's at the top is, for lack of better phrasing, a corporate mouthpiece.

Was it voted so high it triggered some bot detection? That would only explain the former, not the latter. Either way, there's something funny going on.
Some items on amazon.de state "cannot be shipped to your country"; might be that it's simply that?
Obviously, since inflation right now is hovering around 10%.
Well considering that a large chunk of the layoffs were in recruiting and that you basically have a hiring freeze I am sure plenty of rockstar recruiters were nonetheless laid off.
Physical volumes are still easier to secure than computer systems. They might trust the physical copies more.
There's not much of note on steam either. It's pretty much the same games in the top 10 every month.
The specification is versioned. So your compiler would need to be updated to work with the new specification, both with new features and with new bugfixes.
The design of this blog is delightfully readable: no popups, no banners, no FOUC as I wait for a beautiful webfont to load.
they can now Id you based off your retina scan

There's enough wrong with FB/Meta to not need to go into conspiracies
It's not about dominating your mindset. It's about recognizing that your employment is a negotiation and treating it as such. Applying to 2 or 3 other companies every other year to test the market is not the all-encompassing chore, dollar signs for pupils caricature, that it is being made out to be in this thread.

Your company is not your family. The company is loyal to you to the extent that it is contractually obligated to be. The coworker friendships that are worth maintaining longterm will survive past your time with the company.

> I bet most people don't think about their job as "giving discount on their labor"

All salaried workers would be better off if they did just that. As a reminder, Google and Apple engaged in a literal criminal conspiracy to suppress wages.
Unrelated. Spikes in new unique onion addresses are tied to ransomware groups, who have their victims use Tor to negotiate payments.
Yeah, there's no logical distinction, only a moral one.

Imagine 3 scenarios:

Company A rolls out a new mandatory update to a phone that addresses a CPU vulnerability, and to compensate for the reduced performance, overclocks the CPU so now your battery life is 20% shorter.

Company B rolls out a new mandatory update to a phone that improves the battery management so phones do not shut down unexpectedly. However, due to lack of hardware battery reporting when the device was built, they could only estimate the capacity based on the phone's age and natural battery degradation. This causes older phones to have 20% shorter battery life, even though some batteries that were not used as hard could have supported longer.

Company C rolls out a new mandatory update to a phone that detects the phones age and reserves 20% battery capacity on older phones, forcing them to have 20% shorter battery life so users are incentivized to upgrade.

The end result is the same, a phone with worse battery life, but we don't see all of them to be morally the same. The only real difference is the human intent behind it, which is why we probably eventually need regulations that make sure companies should justify that they have a reasonably good intent if challenged. Getting this right is very hard -- you don't want to overburden companies from frivolous cases, but you also want regulations to be effective so they can't just handwave them away.
Same - I get an absolutely comedic amount of abuse from M247.
Also second this, we even split our AWS org into an AWS account per tentant. Although, this will maybe be a problem if we have +100s of clients. But it makes onboarding and off-loading simple.
I don't fully understand the performance implications here.

Say I was using this for a blog engine, and I wanted to run this SQL query:

select * from entries;

But I actually only want to get back entries that my current user is allowed to view - where author_id = 57 for example.

Would PostgreSQL automatically turn the above query into the equivalent of this:

select * from entries where author_id = 57;

And hence run quickly (assuming there's an index on that author_id column)?

Or would it need to run an additional SQL query check for every single row returned by my query to check row permissions, adding up to a lot of extra overhead?
no hackery required. it works wireless as well.
Couldn't agree more. Two or so years ago I was thinking about getting into VR, but once I saw the Quest required Facebook login, I said no thanks.
Not every P60 is a P90 with software cap. Only a few, when a P60 battery is not available. They swapped the battery for a better one in order to keep waiting times low and costumers happy. That's a good thing. Ideally, if it's an one off thing, they should just give the upgrade for free to the customer. However, if it's more of a systematic issue that extended for a while, it's reasonable that they cap it to avoid abuse.

Anyway, now that they already let it out without capping, it's pretty shitty to suddenly cap it. Specially if the car now has a different owner.
I wonder if most sites maintain any of the following addresses or not for externally incoming mail:

hostmaster@<domain>
postmaster@<domain>
webmaster@<domain>
dns-admin@<domain>
info@<domain>
contact@<domain>
root@<domain>

(And if they do, if anyone is actually reading the mail coming to those addresses.)

I used to but I got so much spam and 0 actually legit mails to these addresses on my own domains so I stopped accepting externally incoming mails for those names/aliases.
However in some cases people have known to have their duck talk back to them. People don't talk about this much because of social stigmas but it has been known to happen more than a few times.