skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> I'll do one better, just don't marry. Pre-nups are routinely thrown out by divorce courts.

That's not a good idea in many jurisdictions - after a predetermined number of years of living together as a couple (man and wife), you are considered to be married in community of property anyway[1].

It's safer to simply get married with a prenup; at least that requires either party to spend money and effort nullifying it.

If you don't want to take the risk, just don't move in together at all.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common-law_marriage
Well, compared with the other neocon hawks, Powell was at least not a neocon. And not terribly hawkish.

We live in times when people want to turn the war criminal Jimmy Carter into a moral hero. Don't even talk to me about more recent shit being too far gone. Carter ended the age of the New Deal President. He introduced neoliberal economics, which most people finally realize we're suffering from now. Our bleak future is Carter's "Crisis of Confidence." It's our fault, according to Carter.
So how does that work? How does the laser help extraction? Is it like they’re just heating small bits of grounds over at a time for short durations only, as opposed to heating the whole heat and all the water at once? So still heat extraction?
My family used towels, at least for water bath canning.
The real issue with hypertapping isn't that "not everyone can do it," really. It's the question of if it crosses the line into being inherently injurious to the player in the medium or even short term, in which case the advantage doesn't come from either natural or learned skill but a willingness to ruin your hands for silly game points.

Generally speaking regulated sports tend to draw lines here too, though obviously some draw them fairly far into the injury territory. Most of those are explicitly fighting sports though.
Ask HN: How did you increase your conference speaking skills?
So fix the laws so that economics aligns with ecology, no?

The solution is to stop wasting strategic reserves of water and fertilizer to make non-arable land into arable land. Grow grass on this land instead and turn it into pasture. (Okay, so meat will be 15% more expensive.)

Making use of non-arable land in a sustainable way is why humans invented livestock in the first place.

Humans aren't herbivores, and growing crops suitable for human consumption requires enormous amounts of resources and engineering. (Essentially, terraforming on a planetary scale.) The planet's ecology can't sustain a herbivore human race.
It helps a little.

Having a cold beer within minutes of waking up works a lot better IMO, followed by a greasy breakfast and the painkillers.
So did the need for computers before the revolution started.
It’s just a matter of time
What does Cloudflare normally do with spam sites, is it a hands off approach or do they do some policing?
You can usually improve insulation by popping down to the local DIY store and buying some rolls for your loft making a big difference.

Of course you can only do that once. And if you’re a landlord why would you pay your money to insulate when you wont save any money as your tenants are the ones paying the bills.
What the hell are you talking about? When has weak encryption ever risked something for a proletariat consumer on their iPad?
You make some good points in the middle of the edgy writing, but how do you think people get to the point of proving out new technology?

You'd be shouting at the magic black gold people too back in the day. How would it light people's houses and require a full grid installation, and fires and blackouts, when candles already fix the real world problem.
The countries that suffered the worst from Nazi Germany (the countries that become post-war USSR, France) also had some of the lightest touches when it came to persecuting war criminals after WW2.

Why? Because the war didn’t happen in a vacuum. The decision became a practical one and there were more important things to do.
I'm very thankful to KDE - everything works, haven't seen regressions in ages. One DE aspect that hasn't kept up with the current trends is config backup/restore. I've got ansible scripts that bring a fresh F35 vm to maybe 90% of my existing golden-config setup, including data, but there are some corners which can't be blunted - mostly around multi-monitor setup. Still the best DE for me by far.

That said, I always remove `kf5-akonadi`, `calligra` and disable baloond (wish it could be removed but it's too deeply integrate).
> Additionally, girls tend to be not be recognized as autist as early as boys. They are much better at masking.

My son and daughter are both autistic and I could go on a complete rant about the patriarchal experiences I've had with regards to the medical profession and women. My son got an autism diagnosis at eight just for being "a little bit odd". After may daughter barely left the house for two years from age fifteen she was first declared "borderline". Women are naturally more anxious than men, you see. Took another 1.5 years and a neuropsychologist to say that yes, she is autistic.

I was fortunate enough to be able to switch my work to part-time fully work from home so I could take her to various medical appointments (she has a lot of issues that are often co-morbid). Too many times this was necessary, not only for emotional support, but to be someone in the room who has a penis to advocate on her behalf.
Unfortunately, even though a quantum computer "manipulates wavefunctions", you can still only measure the outcome once. The magic has to happen somewhere in between state preparation and measurement. It's more like a computer with an inbuilt RNG - but if you can reach the same result via multiple execution paths, the probabilities don't just add, but they can interfere like in-phase/out-of-phase oscillatins.
In China at least, the GFW can detect tunneled SSH traffic and cut it off.
Or storage. Like this article is essentially about replacing fossil fuels with synthetic fuel. There are many alternatives to that of course. But the mind boggling economics of synthetic fuels becoming cheaper than fossil fuels at some point are what is interesting here.

I listened to a podcast a while ago with a person involved with a company that is going to be importing 8GW of power to the UK from Morocco with high voltage dc cables. One of the interesting challenges is that the cable factories he needs to produce the cables currently only output around 1500 miles of cable per year. The distance he needs to cover is closer to 3000 miles. And the current plan calls for at least four such cables, so 12000 miles. More factories are needed. Those cables impact the cost proposition of course. Producing and laying cables is a capital intensive business. It's still worth doing but local production is just a lot cheaper. The actual plan is for this stuff to compete with nuclear power. Moroccan solar power is so reliable that it does not really drop much in the winter. And it's about half the price of nuclear. Local solar generation is a lot cheaper than that of course but in the UK that needs to be supplemented with other energy at least part of the year.

Casablanca is actually at the same latitude as San Francisco. Most of the US is further south than places like the UK, Germany, etc. where solar power is pretty effective despite being so far north. That means the US has longer winter days and less severe seasonal drops in solar generation. In short, people are overly pessimistic about solar in the US. Most of it is pretty well situated for decent solar generation around the year. It's just going to require a lot of solar panels to compensate for seasonal drops. Unthinkable if you think in terms of current prices and shortages. But the nature of exponential growth is that that is not going to stay that way for very long.
>One person has decidedly more capability to start a new life than the other.

I mean possibly, possibly not. For instance, my wife makes bundles more than me and is the bread-winner yet she works a licensed career, with her license restricted to a limited geographic area with not so many jobs. For her to start a new life would be much harder than me even though she is the bread winner. Also worth noting 'home-maker' is an extremely common niche in life so it's unreasonable to believe someone occupying that niche can't find another marriage with another divorced bread-winner seeking to return to the interlocking bread-winner home-maker scenario.

As a second, point, I totally object to the idea someone has an obligation to provide someone a 'new' life just because that person lost opportunities by voluntarily entering a relationship. For instance, people often give up career opportunities to take care of an ailing family member and no judge is going to order the ailing family member pay alimony pay them back to start a new career. In particular, if the vows include 'until death do us part' then that is a pretty explicit agreement not to provide provisions for post-divorce alimony arrangement. Even worse, no one should be in the position to pay for somebody else to get a new life if a partner say cheated on you and then divorced you to chase another partner.

And a third note, you've totally looked at it from a one-way lense here. The home-maker bread-winner interlocking really is a team equal effort. When the bread-winner loses the home-maker, they may have a lot to 're-learn' -- how to efficiently manage shopping, cooking, cleaning, balancing the budget (possibly). That takes a lot of time and their health may suffer because they no longer know how to say cook nutritiously anymore, so if the bread-winner needs to pay the home-maker to re-tool for a career then the home-maker should be ordered to help the bread-winner re-learn how to cook and other essential tasks (no joke, efficiently performing all the home-maker tasks can take a long time to master!). It really is a bilateral severance, if we want to create a severance fairly.

>If they're continuing to perform home making duties, they don't have the time to build that new life

If they're continuing to perform labor to pay alimony, they don't have the time to build that new life.

>And you're essentially keeping them trapped in the relationship even after a divorce.

But that's what alimony is! I'd support some provision that alimony could be cancelled if they don't want to perform the maid service, so they could avoid being trapped into receiving an alimony payment.

>You're of course welcome to negotiate anything with a potential spouse before marriage and encode it in a prenup.

The counterpoint is here any severance should be arranged in the pre-nup. In the old days in some cultures this was a dowry, which relied on up-front mutual agreement rather than unilateral violence of the state by judge after the fact. The default should be asset transfers and splitting happens during and at the termination of marriage and not after.
> As someone with a PhD in this domain

you dont need to use phd credentials to have an opinion on this matter
Preloading on NAC does seem to work somewhat, will have to try Emoxypine sometime.
The nice thing about this is that passive mode should be undetectable.

Active mode on the other hand will probably not be useful for long because it is basically based in negligent implementation on the the DPI side and trivial to fix.
I would be careful of running this against online games, it might get you banned.
You are right, I am wrong, weakening encryption abuses people the same way horrible people abuse children.
> It’s just a matter of time

Why? Not every new tech solves a problem people actually have..
Using the computer under ANY type of load would cause that...
Quantum computers are a part of quantum mechanics that s more of a curiosity than something to be engineered at scale. There's so much more to explore in quantum mechanics outside computation that is not receiving commensurate funding. I guess it's because "computing" is what BigTech (who has the money to fund it) understands
Let me put it this way: is me having solar panels making things worse for "the majority"? If so, how?

Because it sounded like the usual trope that if a solution does not fix all problems for all humans everywhere, than it it sucks and the person doing what they can is a naive fool, if not a straight up villain.
"baddies on all sides" gets a downvote from me.

At the very most favorable view of that sentiment, it's true. Completely true.

In the least favorable light, this post is trying to play down something else without evidence. Thus it's some trolling lie.
> everything works

hyperbole much? how does everything work and at the same time every weekly update corrects tons of bugs?
> loss of salmon breeding grounds.

There are technology available to alleviate this problem. Not easy, but solvable
> There's an old joke that you can watch your dog run away for three days which is not that much of an exaggeration.

We have a joke here about people who live in the flat northern coastal regions of Germany: They can see at breakfast who is visiting at lunch. -- But that is nothing compared to the people who live in the mountains in the south: They can see at breakfast who is visiting at supper.
Multiple separate locations,

coordinated at the same time partly at night,

using power tools to cut fiber in ways that are hard to repair,

That does scream professional job.

Now I agree that many countries manage their physical network security in a weak/ lousy way.

Interestingly, poorer countries tend to do a better job because they know people will mess with infrastructure.
I've tried to use KDE/Plasma for a very long time, but everything just feels... wrong.
I really dislike the layout of all their apps and menus, the sizes of icons and buttons are weird, I dislike the fonts they use, and generally just everything seems "out of place".
Having said that, I know you can customize the desktop and that's exactly what I've tried to do, but that has always resulted in such an unstable desktop that it's been nearly unusable, even after spending weeks on trying to fix things.
An easier solution - for me - has been to just use GNOME and install 2 or 3 extensions and use the GNOME Tweaks tool to set things up the way I like them. Recently though, I've switched to Debian and decided to try out the Cinnamon desktop and it's been almost perfect from the start.
Canning food is pretty simple for those that can follow instructions.

It isn't too difficult (i've done it), but seriously: Follow the instructions, use tested recipes, and use the proper equipment. If it says to use a pressure canner, it is so you do not get botulism or another food-borne illness. Your chances of getting sick from canned goods is higher with home canning than commercial canning - following the instructions greatly reduces this.

If you don't have a pressure canner, you'll be limited in the things you can safely can - luckily, these will include jellies and tomatoes.
You’ll be pleased to find out that PeerTube already has a Docker deployment then!

I’ve been running it in Kubernetes with very few issues.

The documentation is available here: https://docs.joinpeertube.org/install-docker
This talks about time estimation, I think this might be an unusual opinion, but I actually wish we did that. It'd make more sense to me than estimating 'complexity', and then pretending it's time anyway.
My first idea would be a government bug bounty.

If you catch any of your own device doing that, you report it to a government agency and they'll check in their database if your finding is new, and if it is, they will immediately pay you $10k and announce it publicly.

And then afterwards, the government can fine the manufacturer $100k to recoup their costs.

Also, most of the updates that people hate have been pretty blatant. Like when your TV starts showing ads when it was ad-free before, it is pretty obvious that something changed.
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/9791247-what-a-shocking-bad...

>> "What a shocking bad hat!' was the phrase that was next in vogue"

-- Extraordinary Popular Delusions and The Madness of Crowds, 1841

Memetic culture is older than you think. That book covers a lot of different types of group behavior that could be called "memes".
Reminds me of the Metcalc power infrastructure attacks [0]. Can't help but feel these are some sort of state level trial runs of some sort.

We're seeing this with Ukraine & starlink to some extent - infra is now a key component of warfare & frankly dry runs make sense in that context. Same with testing your ability to cut undersea cables

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metcalf_sniper_attack
While it's good of course that the courage and sound judgement of Hugh Thompson be recognized, remembered, and celebrated, My Lai isn't a story about a hero.

It's the story of abominable war crimes committed by abominable US soldiers who were never held accountable for their abominable crimes.
As a case study we evaluated the performance of this along with other languages that use immutable data structures (perf testing) for a recent production app we were building. After some evaluation we had the opinion that the penalty of using immutable HAMT's on the Node/JS platform is just too high, at least in its current lib form. Immutable structures are often somewhat slower, but the relative penalty of using a HAMT on the Node/JS platform vs a straight mutable structure was much higher than other languages. Floats for numbers, conversions back and forth implicitly, pop count intrinsic missing, conversions in and out, and other such overheads make the relative penalty of an immutable HAMT vs a mutable JS map much higher compared to other languages such as .NET or Java let alone C/Rust.

Given Node is mostly single threaded as well some of the advantages (not all!) of immutability diminish on that platform making the performance penalty harder to swallow, at least for my use case.

It of course may not matter to your case, but I find the benefits of these structures come from their quicker clone/copy time in many applications, snapshot like characteristics, easy large diff's, etc. For this to matter the collection has to be of a decent size where a linear copy/equals/etc is too slow to work for the use case. At that point speed starts to matter as the costs of random lookup start to grow/drift further away from a standard mutable map and for JS we deemed the penalty too high and decided on another backend platform amenable to writing generic data structures.
I find it odd that the law considers the contributions during marriage symmetrically, but losses of each party asymmetriclly. That is to say, the contributions of a homemaker are equal to that of an income earner during marriage, but there is no harm from losing the expected support of the homemaker.

The homemaker can continue to be a homemaker for themselves exclusively, while receiving half an income. The income earner needs to work while homemaking, or work while supporting a 2nd homemaker.

The legal situation is complicated because the courts try to balance conflicting objectives. One is to help the homemaker reestablish themselves, the other is to maintain a lifestyle they are accustomed to. If it was only the former, some sunset duration would be appropriate, I think.

The reality is that it is often a distinctive. If the partner receiving alimony starts a career or remarries, they will lose the revenue stream.
Parent means to say that its ability to add numbers is an illusion brought about by seeing enough numbers. The same way it gives the illusion of deep thinking by parroting deep thoughts it was trained on.
> Everyone is fixing bugs all the time

That's not how it works. Every program that evolves also creates bugs all the time because of bad implementations, bad formulation, bad problem scoping, bad integration. If your project creates more bugs every week than it can possibly fix you can have these weekly bug fixing newsletter forever and at the same time accumulate more bugs than you ever had.
Yes, absolutely. But then I risk getting sounded vainly opinionated, especially on HN without basis if I don't give a disclaimer that I have spent half a decade working on these specific things. Too often, people get called out for no reason. And that sometimes hurt.

(If I was credentials hopping I would rather put a longer list of illustrious institutions, co-authors and awards, just saying. I am not - its just justifying that I know reasonably enough to share a sane opinion, which you may or may not agree with)
I bought the Lenovo 10e tablet for $100 ($90+case) and it has 1920x1200 display. Trade offs: 10.1 inch display, mediatek cpu, tablet (no stand/keyboard).

Not the normal price (seeing $334 now), but that was direct from Lenovo.
Don’t google “request smuggling vuln”; this is the state of all proxies and load balancers. Everyone tests the happy path and calls it a day.
Scientific American was first published in 1845. A different type of periodical, though.
And much more than trade. It had effect on road infrastructure, various temporary constructs including school rooms for emergency situations and housing as well.
No, the John von Neumann report ("First Draft of a Report on the EDVAC") is dated 30 June 1945 and it was widely circulated during the following months in typewritten copies.

Freely-downloadable copies can be easily found now by searching the Internet.

This 1945 report is the one which initiated all the many research projects for building digital electronic computers during the following years, at various universities from USA and UK, and at various research institutions from USA and UK, e.g. NIST, NPL, IAS, followed then by projects at various commercial companies.

Regarding credits, this draft of a report was the result of discussions over several months with the members of the ENIAC team about how the successor of ENIAC should be made.

There were no British results that could have been credited in it (except very old results obtained many years before WWII; most digital electronic circuits, like flip-flops and digital counters, had been invented in UK, either by British or by people of other nationalities working in UK), so the credits could have shown only which ideas came from von Neumann himself, which ideas came from members of the ENIAC team, and which were older ideas, already popularized by people like Howard Aiken and others who had designed electro-mechanical computers.

Since the draft document that went "viral" through the research community was not a final paper ready for publishing, it can hardly be criticized for lacking a bibliography and credits section.

Moreover, the ENIAC team members cannot really complain about not receiving appropriate credits in the draft document, because now we know that they had actually learned useful information from John Atanasoff at the Iowa State College, but they have never credited him in any way.

From both John Atanasoff (1940) and John von Neumann (1945) we have very valuable reports describing how to make a digital electronic computer, where many important ideas appear for the first time in public documents. From the members of the ENIAC team, we do not have any document of comparable quality, so their greatest merit is that they have taught John von Neumann a part of what they have learned during the ENIAC project, enabling the latter to write a synthesis good enough to enable any competent electronics engineer to start designing a digital electronic computer.

Besides explaining whatever he had learned from the ENIAC team, John von Neumann discussed in his report various possible improvements, like having a random-access memory instead of a sequential-access memory.
There is also https://github.com/kevinlawler/kerf

> Kerf2 is designed for full concurrency. It also adds transparent type promotion, a C++ instead of C basis, and more.

Which goes unlicensed right now and was created just a bit before the license change in Kerf1. I wonder if Kerf1 will get any more attention or the focus is now at Kerf2.