skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Most of the points have been covered in other comments, but not much talk of fewest moves solving [0].

There are 3 obvious choices on how to deal with inspection time: none, some, and lots. The current and most popular event is in the some category. It's enough time that competitors can plan out a not insignificant portion of the solve, but by no means all of it. Competitors can gain an advantage by training to maximise the use of inspection time which in some ways adds to the event, but can also be seen as unrepresentative of the true solve time.

No inspection time would make for an interesting event but I don't think it would replace the event with some inspection time. They are different events with different but overlapping skill sets that the video doesn't really discuss. Instead it attempts to reach a conclusion by timing a phase that the competitors are using with the knowledge that the time doesn't matter.

Lots of inspection time, represented by the fewest moves event is an interesting but underappreciated event in my opinion. It takes out the physical aspect of how fast a competitor can turn faces, instead competitors have 1 hour to find the shortest sequence of moves to solve the same scramble. Drawbacks are the long amount of time per attempt compared to the usual speed events, and the lower resolution to differentiate competitors.

0: https://www.worldcubeassociation.org/regulations/#article-E-...
That looks pretty horrible (text on top of placeholder/label?!), but seeing the OS again is indeed nostalgic.

Plus just the feeling of WIP app I guess. That could have been me.
Probably not -- people aren't as obscenely overextended with debt this time. Most of the debt out there is conventional mortgage debt. There shouldn't be a tidal wave of bad debt in the same way.

Plus, the ultra-low mortgage rates led to lots of refinance volume, which makes most of the debt into recourse debt, so a much smaller share of homeowners would be able to just "jingle-mail" their way out of depreciated housing.

Prices will probably fall, and some markets may experience collapse due to the combination of excessive ebullience and unfavorable demographic trends, but I don't anticipate the same massive wipeout, as much as I would personally benefit from it.

It could happen -- some markets only really just ended their COVID foreclosure moratoria, and in those markets there almost certainly will be a big wave of foreclosures that will now be timed right with the end of the house-buying enthusiasm, and that always could spread contagion-like to places that have more sustainable markets, but I don't think so. I think this will be a slower decline, rather than a tidal wave of demand destruction, but only time will tell for sure.
I get the point that psychiatrists wanted to avoid over-diagnosing/over-prescribing, but what if they ended up over-prescribing societal shame itself, which is after all a very blunt instrument?

This is particularly likely to occur if the incentives are aligned to make the problem seem to go away rather than doing the hard work of actually fixing things. In other words, they may not have been preventing or curing anything (at least for the patients who needed the most help).
This sounds like you’re just externalising the costs of integration of your changes on to other people.

Generally we want to reduce any accidentally complexity and the way to achieve that is to reduce the latency of code reaching production. So for example you want to minimise PR/branches in flight ideally to 0. So you should be asking how you can reduce them - eg trunk based development, omitting asynchronous code reviews etc.
These do look a little like "an alternative use for a screwdriver is to use the handle to bang in nails". Yes, but it looks a little hacky and I suspect there might be another tool designed for that niche. I'm not convinced that the screwdriver development team will be prioritising its nail-banging feature long-term.
I've heard people argue that that effect isn't a nudge, it's deceit.

That is, all you're doing is tricking people who didn't read carefully. People don't know they've opted in and would opt out if you called and told them that they checked the box.

I find it generally plausible that defaults don't matter much for what people consider very important decisions. I have minimal experience in this area, though.
I mean, in terms of riskiness, this is as least risky as you can get in the field of crawling/scraping. You're not scraping product prices, social media profiles, real estate data, or anything that is majorly commercial - just recipes.

Disclaimer: not legal advice.
Well, if you want to build a commercial product using dwarfs, you could always (shock, horror) contact the dev and *pay* him to license it to you under a bsd-like license (or whatever).

(the dwarfs dev would have to work it out amongst all who contributed to his repo)
Community property laws differ by state in the US, but I would doubt that an affair would have any impact on the division of marital assets.
If a session is required to service a user's explicit request (eg. "add item to basket" but not "track user for ads") then explicit consent isn't required. The user's explicit request is enough. So there's no conflict.
My Apple branded silicone case is already falling apart after 3 months of normal use, so I guess I’d have to agree with them.
Yes, I'm not sure of the year we got it, but it was definitely when I was between 7 and 17.

It was a 2-stroke Stihl, probably the smallest they made, with an automatic brake in case of kickback. And a manual explaining how to avoid it - I never had any issue because I followed the directions. Including goggles and over the ear hearing protection.
Then I guess Google is not a moral business.
It’s a combination of both sides. It’s something like this:

For EMV the terminal and the card generate a request, and send it to the payment processor/bank.

They say yes/no and send back some stuff needed to complete the transaction. At this point there would be a hold on your card.

The terminal and card verify that and finish things, preparing proof of the final transaction.

That’s sent to the processor again who confirms the transaction took place. This is when the money is taken and the hold disappears.

Final proof from the processor is sent back to the terminal so the system knows everything went through. Now you get your receipt.
Apple wants people to break their expensive devices more often? Color me shocked
AI Used to Create Shockingly Realistic Portraits of People Who Don’t Exist
The problem is that few people seem to understand the infrastructure as code concept, and essentially break the core k8s declarative architecture with imperative workflows that look just like the bash script install insanity we left behind. Workflows that are encouraged by tools like Helm and examples that create k8s objects on the fly without even creating much less retaining the "code" part of IaC.

It turns a tool that escaped the tyranny of endlessly mutating blessed servers with immutable, contained services and unified declarative life cycles, back into an imperative mess of magical incantations that must be spoken in just the right way.

Kubernetes is simple when used as designed, but staggeringly complicated when forced into the mutable imperative workflows it was expressly designed to prevent.
It's worth to note that an increase has been in real life as well as result of plastic surgery. And it's not only boob size. Same goes for men though I belive they make use of the gym& supplements. Everyone wants to look "better"/more attractive for obvious reasons(i.e better pay, better life etc)
That doesn't make the GP question any less relevant or meaningful.
ERCOT didn't declare any capacity emergencies on that day, or any recent day. Is it possible you just suffered from a stochastic outage, and not a capacity-related intentional disconnection?

https://www.ercot.com/services/comm/mkt_notices/opsmessages
Would that not imply that all energy is renewable, given that you can make endless hydrogen by electrolyzing water with endless electricity? Then convert the hydrogen into your hydrocarbon of choice using the Sabatier process, and again endless electricity? Maybe I am projecting my own bias onto this, but there's something about endless electricity that does not imply renewable.
1. 4th amendment, never let police in your home voluntarily.

2. If the woman contacts your child again, file for restraining order. Tell your neighbors to do the same.

People have rights, better stand up for them or they'll get trampled by blue policies like CPS, which have a long history of abuse and lack of care.

Big adopters are also generally abusive parents. Sounds to me the woman is projecting.
There's a full wall of phone cases at the official Apple Stores... If they were serious, they wouldn't have them.
Is that "Accept all cookies" or "Accept all our terms, not just about cookies but also our rights to your first born"? Did you check?

My point is that an "accept all" reflex isn't necessarily safe even if you don't retain cookies.
The nitty gritty of everyday things like this can be so interesting sometimes
You'll still have to write all the yamls to deploy your app to k8s. Your ops team wont be analysing those requirements for your app.
Rent competes with mortgage payments not housing prices. Interest rates are up so payments will go up unless prices come down.
There’s a process to it.

Every card, as part of the mag-stripe, has a little bit of data on it called the Service Code. It’s three characters. Part of that tells the terminal if the card has an EMV chip.

The terminal is required (I believe, by the brands) to force you to use the chip. The chip has to fail a set number of times (I believe usually 3) before it will process a mag-stripe transaction.

Even then, the payment processor is informed this transaction was a failed chip transaction that fell back to msg-stripe. So the processor can determine if they want to take the risk.

(Of course this doesn’t apply to mag-stripe only devices like older gas pumps)
It'd be very cool to have something like virtualenv or Anaconda that uses DwarFS. Python environments take up so much of my harddrive.
I caught one of the self checkouts rebooting at my local grocery store and it was still running Windows XP.
> Wait for the weekends takings to clear into your merchant account, and then take off with the money.

That's the difficult part - since the acquiring bank is fully financially responsible if you do so (they'll compensate everyone else involved for the fraud chargebacks, no matter if they can recover it from you), they generally take quite stringent steps to fight merchant-initiated scams, and the simplest step is simply freezing the money for some time; 30 days is not uncommon but I have even seen 90 days if the merchant's profile is risky or if the incoming payment volume suddenly increases significantly - the bank is effectively treating any payments to the merchant as a line of credit or letter of guarantee until it's clear that those payments won't be fraudulent or charged back. So a merchant can quite realistically do some shenanigans with a reprogrammed terminal, but they won't be permitted to take off with a large amount of money from the merchant account until a sufficient amount of time will have passed for the first chargebacks or complaints of fraud to show up.
So, these were educational projects, the purpose being to instill in children a sense of responsibility. I'd be interested in hearing about how well it worked. I've lived in rural America and I see a huge difference in maturity between suburban and farm kids. The daily responsibilities of farm life seem to instill a focus and determination that carries into the workplace. The trains project would be a much less immersive experience, so I wonder how pronounced any benefit would be.
> whereas I go to the self-checkout at the grocer's

"Please place item in bagging area. Please place item in bagging area. Please place item in bagging area. Thank y... Please place item in bagging area. Please wait for assistance." Yeah, no thanks. I only use those crappy fail machines when I have no choice because there are no open checkout lanes with people manning them.
Make that $500 with hydrogen lift, rented oxygen bottle and parachute, and no seat, and that'd be tempting.
What are you talking about? A scratch doesn’t make an aluminum case fragile, it’s extremely solid.
Just to be provocative (in reality I agree with you that light cones are more fundamental objects than any spacelike hypersurface, and that light cone surfaces are physically meaningful at least in the local neighbourhood of p) I'll drop in some Bob Geroch: "[Special Relativity] emerges as just one more physical system. It consists, just like the others, of certain fields subject to a certain system of first-order, quasilinear partial differential equations. The causal cones of special relativity (which reflect the speed of light) have no special significant over the causal cones of any of the many other such systems in physics." <https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.1614>

(That democracy of causal cones paper is surprisingly relevant to some of the conversations you are running here tonight, particularly §2. I think you might especially enjoy the last paragraph on p. 6, notably its last two sentences starting "We note that, quite generally, C is a nonempty, open convex cone of tangent vectors...". In the context of our discussion, you might not enjoy the part starting at the bottom of p. 7 to the start of §3 :-).)
How is reviewing individual commits a good thing? Maybe I’m misunderstanding something, but my branches have tons of micro commits that ultimately lead to a larger change. Reviewing each individual commit in that type of branch seems like it would be very tedious, and not useful. The reviewer would be forced to follow my entire process, with all the dead ends and refactors along the way. Seems like it would take a lot longer. Or is there another workflow that I’m not seeing?
>What is wrong with this picture?

America's desire for cheap beef. It is what is for dinner after all.

Corn subsidies are specifically used to keep feed prices down, and thus beef prices down.

Food prices due to inflation are going to play a HUGE role in the midterms, agree or disagree you are not going to get any elected official to vote to increase the price of the hamburger.
Honest question: why do we need wholly separate devops/infra teams as opposed to just one expert to teach the other devs if K8s was supposed to make IaC so efficient?
https://twitter.com/JordanSchachtel/status/15510476142246666...
Camera lenses on most high end phones have been synthetic sapphire for some time now. Until synthetic diamonds are cheap enough to use as lenses (and even then idk the technical challenges of that) we likely won't see any improvement to the scratch resistance of lenses.
So would it be possible to install software or hardware which always returns a "success" from the card reader hardware without it actually doing the transaction and give everyone who uses that machine free food until someone figures it out? Hmm…
In this scenario I'm putting myself in the position of a support staff member. So in that scenario I would impose my personal beliefs on the riders that are harming themselves. Legally they should be able to do what they want. But I wouldn't want to get involved in supporting their behavior. There's a difference between withdrawing active support and providing active impedance.

If you mean I'm imposing my beliefs on the support staff from the perspective of a keyboard warrior - you're also right. But I'm not actually stopping anyone from doing anything. Just stating my opinions.

Basically if your actions cause me empathetic harm I will not involve myself in them.
Unfortunately I cannot install the rust compiler tool chain or other third party binaries on my work laptop :(
> When we race for 100m stride, everyone has the same initial conditions. Same starting line.

Altitude can affect world records for running (less air resistance, but also less air to breathe)
I don’t think almond trees will grow in Iowa. I’m not an arborist though.
China seems to be doing pretty well with education
Feel the need to observe that we don't need to use PRs at all. Furthermore I see the PR workflow is mostly a cult (which by the way I don't remember anyone asking for -- it seemed to come out of the woodwork either from gitHUB, or from Google). I think it makes some sense in the context of maintenance fixes to a mature release. Perhaps also makes sense in the context of "over the transom" contributions to an OSS project. But for the typical development scenario where most code is green field, and all the developers work in the same organization, it's often just a bad choice of process.

So that's why you get to: stacked PRs and whether or not they're good.

Rewind to the place where you decided to use PR process in the first place and consider if that was a wise choice.
I assumed boobs were getting bigger because more and more people are becoming obese.
Bashing? The goals of each project are different and compliment each other. I am almost positive the folks at PG encourage projects like Standard Ebooks.
In the US skimming of mag-stripe is still surprisingly/sadly common.

Most(?) store gift cards don’t have chips. I think some smaller banks may not have chips on debit cards. I don’t know about “food stamp” cards or gas station branded cards.

So as a thief you can collect what you can get. Plus you can screw up the EMV slot so people must swipe, making them vulnerable (if they don’t use contactless).
This web stack sounds hopelessly anachronistic.

If you’d just use a modern stack you could serve 10x less requests with more hardware.
That’s absolutely appalling, whether or not it shaves a full ten years off people. Reminds me of the one time I visited Ghengzao in China. The pollution was so bad it was cloying.
But the US government can do something. They could pass a bill that allows a progressive tax write-off for builders who build X units. More write offs for redeveloping houses older than a hundred years.

Instead of all the tax cuts, borrowing and money printing done since trump era, we could have incentivized builders to build more.
What kind of therapy do they attempt? Anything that attempts to integrate the physical body w/ the brain's schematic representation? I'm struck by similarities between BID and phantom limb, and wonder if tx incorporates any of the same strategies.

Also, FWIW, I'm sorry for your condition. It sounds hellish.
Why Aren’t Long Jumpers Jumping Longer? Why Olympic Champions Getting Worse (2012)
I think the differentiator is that SE puts a lot more care into the creation of the end product than PG.
Having started my technical career long ago as an angsty teen looking to develop cheats, I'm aware of the architectural issues. This is probably a hot take, but for FPS and the like, I view wallhack-type cheats as fully inevitable, and more of a game design challenge than a technical one.

Compared to old school FPS like COD and CSGO, I'll throw out Overwatch as a good example of a game that de-emphasizes the relative importance of knowing an enemy's position by dramatically raising TTK and placing importance on team coordination, mechanics, and character selection. A cheating sniper in OW can easily get shut down by the coordinated actions of two enemy tank players. Designing the game in a way that limits the ability of a single wall-hacking sniper to ruin the experience is IMO much more effective than getting into a kernel-level AC arms race. Valorant still has cheats available for it, after all.
> Based on the nudge findings, after much debate and effort, they were updated to dictate that the max options forms was pre selected in the brief it would cause more individuals would opt for that as opposed to contributing zero.

I would be shocked if that wasn't true though. Is there any evidence it's not true in that specific case, that pre-selecting the max options causes more individuals to opt for that? Have individuals opting for that indeed gone up since this was done?
I had a 1 minute look at the "optimized" C code - it's calling malloc for every word.
If the big landlords were not in there it would just be more smaller landlords doing the same thing.

The only thing to be done if you dislike the power of landlords is to flood the market with supply, which should be policy in every jurisdiction in America, but isn't because the owners/landlords are in control of the policies.
Converting more properties to rentals is bad for rents?

Increasing the supply...of rental housing...makes the rental market worse for renters?

It doesn't provide value to NIMBYs who don't want those people in their neighborhoods.

I know whereof I speak because I live in a neighborhood, where most properties are not rented out, but they resemble apartments, and there was an ongoing soap opera about a vacant lot which was developed to be a rental property.

And there probably were unscrupulous things that went on, in terms of permits and zoning and stuff. There were allegations about a retaining wall not being properly constructed to prevent erosion.

But people are basically against it because it "looks different" and will bring lower class people in.

Personally, I don't care about property values because I'm not in the business of flipping houses, whereas I would rather not pay a lot of property taxes.

Do you rent or own your home?
Don’t payment gateway request an initialization procedure that registers the POS with the remote gateway ?

During that procedure the terminal unique ID is sent, and depending on your environment, if you have a stable outgoing IP the connection might be filtered on that as well (assuming you do that on site, not at a POS provider). Jumping through a bunch of hoops you might still be able to hook a POS on another merchant account, but once the issue is detected there would be enough info to reverse the transactions (doing that after capture could cost fees, but it’s still better than nothing).

Looking at the delays between the transactions being cleared and the money appearing in your bank account, even with the best timing you might not see a penny of all of that.
Does your 2-3 hours per day average include rest days and HIIT workouts? I think when you factor those in, 30+ hours a week really is a lot of cycling. And absolutely not something that somebody will jump right into after one to two weeks, which the parent claimed.

To be clear I am not saying that the average person couldn’t build up to 30+ hours a week of cycling. Much the opposite - the point of my initial post was that it’s relatively easy to rack up long hours on a bike, especially if you go at a slow pace. But rather that most people do not have the time or the motivation to spend that many hours on a bike, unless they race professionally.

Looking through Strava, there is nobody in my area who has averaged more than 15 hours a week over the last 4 weeks. My weekly average is well below that. Do you log your workouts in Strava or some other app? What is your actual weekly average time spent?

I think the TdF comparison is useful because it gives a rough idea of the sort of distance you can cover in 30 hours/week. Something on the order of 3000 km per month, which again I just don’t ever see any amateur riders doing in my area.

If you’re really riding that much, or even half of that, then kudos to you. I would love to be able to put in those kinds of numbers. But I still think it’s really rare for amateurs, and requires an obsessive dedication to the hobby.