skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> And one reason is because there is so much surface level learning available, which is so easy and interesting to consume, that anything that takes work and time is postponed, and eventually conditioned to be ignored.

I also work with youth. I don't agree. I see youth go broad and go deep. There's terrific variation in aptitudes to go deep, but it's certainly out there. Most of us didn't live at the library and look for deep resources (you and I did). I think a bigger fraction of youth accomplish high levels of aptitude and find areas to go deep in than ever before.

I do think there's fundamental change-- not all of it negative. We had to plan our next move at the library, right? We had to think a long time for what a good next move was in our area of interest. Youth now can afford to be infinitely more speculative than we ever were able to get away with.

And, yes, smartphones and their social pressures add completely new problems and distractions, and many educational environments do not manage them well.
Ok, I'll add that above. Thanks!
This is important preservation work. Thank you!
Yeah it was just an experimental UI design thing. I remember back in the day I don’t give a crap about UI/UX. As long as the ListView functions smoothly.
Maybe when contracting with the devil?
> It seems like your view is informed from a cursory reading of the docs, rather than any first-hand experience.

Fun though personal attacks are, you would be wrong; I have done all of this, including using docker to build images and k8s to run them.

> Docker produces OCI images, there's no need to "export them" in that format.

Sure.

> So since Kubernetes can run any OCI image, and Docker images are OCI, Kubernetes supports running Docker images out of the box.

...Kubernetes supports running OCI images out of the box. That they were built by docker does not make them docker images, any more than building a Windows program with MinGW creates a "Linux program" just because it was compiled on Linux. If you use docker to build an OCI image and then create a container from that image in a stock k8s cluster, you are not creating a docker container, you are creating a (most likely) containerd container from an OCI image.

> The documentation you linked to is if you wanted to swap out the container runtime Kubernetes is using, not if you just want to run a Docker image.

Yes, I was attempting to charitably include the case where your claim could still be correct. (Since by adding the docker runtime you can create a k8s cluster that creates docker containers.)
This is great but want to clarify - Kindles do support Epub now. Which is great. Because I love the Kindle ecosystem and I really like a project like this.

How do you handle translated works? Like The Communist Manifesto was written in German. Would something like Death in Venice be in the works too?
I had the same issue around 2018. Google Maps would show my address on a street a couple of blocks away. Mine was the only address on the street with this issue. This is in a suburban development where the houses are right next to each other. I reported it to Google and about an hour later it was corrected.
I think most (? certainly many) readers like the links to past discussions. If it were just a list of past submissions, most of which didn't get comments, I'd agree with you.

I also try to drop the ones that got comments but the comments were off topic or otherwise useless.
You can get fake Arduinos for less than the price of cheap coffee.
Saudi Planning Skyscraper That's 75 Miles Wide
On the website, like a Google captcha. I clicked through to see what the macro story was like and was hit with a captcha. USA, no VPN.
I've been working in .NET for the last year using intel Mac for the first 6 months exclusively and recently switching between Windows desktop and Mac (performance of desktop machine mostly, not willing to be early adopter with M1/2)

I also use Rider exclusively and going to Visual Studio on Windows now and then I'm not missing much (visual studio did have some nice plugin for debugging compiler plugins, had to hack around than in Rider)

I can't comment on Unity part.

F# for me overpromises and underdelivers - it all sounds amazing in theory but it's been 3 times over the last decade where I've tried to use it (last time just a few months ago) and it never just works - I've spent diagnosing "why isn't this F# feature working as advertised" than solving my problem (from tooling like F# projects breaking autocomplete in VS solution - even for C# projects, to language features like type providers just being a nightmare to work with and integrate into CI/CD)
> This degrades the developer experience regardless of how cheap compute and storage are.

I would argue that if you only have one good tool to do something, you have an opportunity to make much better tools for that something.

It's not docker's job to be better than Makefile with every use-case. You do realize what you're asking for here right? It's impossible. No tool is perfect for every use-case.
How does this compare to WoF compression in NTFS (which uses LZX)?
Ok that answers my question, so they solve it in 3 seconds after the first few move mainly based on instinct and experience?
2 is a lot smaller of a number than I remembered but I looked at the regulations in the way back machine and it looks like it's been that way for a while. I kind of wonder why they'd have it at such a low number.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32210234

As for the Chernobyl comment, if they had not dug under the elephant’s foot before it started to cut into the subsoil, that’s exactly what would have happened when it hit the water table. People risked a lot to keep that from happening.
What part of the .NET SDK isn't supported on Linux?
Isn't it funny to see how folks have a hard time putting down the tools they're used to for the latest and greatest?

As if something being fast is all that matters.
Most of the time you see Rust lose on that kind of benchmark due to it not using buffered algorithm in the standard library (buffers are available and easy to use but they are an option you have to think about and search for).
Science is about discovering models that account for observed nature.

Engineering is about making things that work. GPS is very firmly on the side of a thing that works. Likewise, rockets. People sometimes use those when doing science.

So your trotting GPS out as an example of correct science did not in any way illustrate what you imagined.
It's fairly common for people to get away with bad things for the sake of some kind of political reason. The first example that comes to mind is Hirohito who was kept in power after a terribly destructive rule for reasons of political expedience.

Ideally everyone does get brought to justice, of course, but pragmatics will usually overrule that.
Closely read the second half again.
Well, maybe? For every hard problem which requires smart people to actually innovate, there's 100 which involve writing boilerplate to get information from a form to a database and back again.
Slightly OT.

What resources would people here suggest for learning about file systems? I see a lot of new file systems like zfs, btrfs, etc. I looked up for resources but couldn't find anything substantial.

I want to learn how they work so that I can appreciate projects like this and compare them.

I looked into the Build Your Own X repo but didn't find anything. I found a book called Practical File System Design: The BeOS file system but it's apparently dated, and I'm not sure I want too much of a deep dive.
I thought that myself doing business: play by „the rules“, pricing is fixed, „this does not work with this configuration and that hardware“ on a phone call - I would take this as final, and so on.

As I‘m now in my thirties I realized, there are no rules (well or very few). 90% of success is just showing up.

„Well, you are here, let’s just have a quick talk“. It‘s not guaranteed that you get a job, a contract or something, but if your Risk is Zero, you can only win.
People learn to make music, even though it takes years to make music at a level comparable to the music you hear.
You work with math?

---

A company I worked for had its own in-house tool for leave management of employees.

The leaves are supposed to get reset on January 1st but that year it didn't happen automatically for whatever reason.

Somebody asked on an internal chat group when the "leaves would be reset".

It had been a long day. I casually replied "mid March".

Everybody panicked, and I panicked because I didn't know why they where panicking.

Later we discovered I thought he was asking about when leaves on trees would reappear after the winter (after they fell down during fall/autumn) :D

This was weird because I was in a torrid region where it's rather hot and humid all year round, there's no such thing as winter, it never snows, and the trees are evergreen — there's never an all-leaves-are-down situation.

(The year prior to that I was in another part of the Earth where the leaves are gone winter. I told you it had been a long day.)
> remember those?

Not really tbh. I haven't used a CD in my adult life. I remember "burning a CD" was a thing and that's about it.
We’ve watched Defending Jacob, See, Home Before Dark (kids show), Servant and they were very good, quality shows
On the contrary, the DevOps team is a dev team, supported by an ops team that manages ops and exposes tools to the DevOps team to manage the lifecycle of their own deployments.
I'll expand on this since I found it interesting. Essentially it's a reference to a French epic called "In Search of Lost Time" by Marcel Proust. It was his life's work and is around 4.2k pages or 1.3 million words! That's much larger than "War and Peace", "Les Miserables", "Crime and Punishment", "The Iliad", and "The Odyssey" combined; which is super impressive.
It was Mao foisting it onto Korea. Stalin was a careful opportunist and thought Korea would be too risky and reckless, so he was hesitant but was eventually persuaded by Mao that it was a good idea.

> local Korean communists ... were much more enthused about revolution in their countries than Stalin was.

Even if we substitute "Stalin" for "Mao", this statement has low epistemic legibility and low relevance. It could have been 100, 10k, or 1 million Korean communists who were genuinely more "enthused" than Mao was, given that there's likely to be N > 0 people who are more enthused about any kind of political project inside of a large population when their enthusiasm is contrasted to that of a single person. That's a given. It doesn't detract from the fact that an ideology and system was forced onto a sizeable unwilling population with Mao's direct backing.
Earthly doesn't run containers, it builds them. You can use the resulting images with whatever runtime/orchestrator you want.
Show HN: Preact Binary Server Apps
Their support for VSCode is pretty considerable and reached the point where I'm comfortable working on non-GUI applications in C# in it a while ago, and from a UI perspective prefer it to Visual Studio.
> Does that analogy really hold when you're making software and not a physical product?

I think it does. Of course the minimal skill required is higher than hiring some person off the street to bolt on a few parts as the product proceeds down the assembly line.

I worked at Microsoft many years ago and it was a lot like a software factory
Anything from the vlog Brothers, crash course, etc.

The secret life of components

The connections series is on YouTube.

Tech ingredients

Technology connections
Even in the author's example most of them are ad-hominem. The author's enlightened view is that in order for the argument to be ad-hominem it needs to be explicit. If you make an argument and my response is "you are an asshole" it is implied that I am replying to your argument and I am attacking your character. Those are the only required criteria. My response does not have to directly relate to the argument being made, it just has to be an attack of character instead of the substance of the argument. My calling the person an asshole maybe a bad argument made because I lack anything better or it could have been made to imply that the person making the argument did so with an ulterior motive of expressinf their asshole character.
"HTTPS won't work directly, but has anybody ever written a rudimentary, less/more-like front-end to actualy browse the web while relying on netcat?"

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bonzini/netcat/master/scri...

http://raw.githubusercontent.com/blmayer/astro/main/astro

http://raw.githubusercontent.com/radare/ired/master/vired

The second two are included only as examples of how some people write "interactive" shell scripts. I prefer non-interactive scripts myself. I write programs to help me use the web _non-interactively_. "Tech" companies and graphical browser authors are always advocating for "interactive" web use (eyeballs) because that is what is most suitable for selling advertising services. As _Hobbit wrote in 1995, "The web sucks." Graphical browsers are to aid those seeking to make money from the "dismal kludge".

From one text-only web user to another, what do you think about Links' single key shortcuts, e.g., backslash to view source or asterisk to show image links. While I think Links' menus are somewhat cumbersome and slow, not to mention they can change from version to version, these single key shortcuts are very fast.

By staying on the command line, the web (and computer use in general) IMO can indeed be a more focused experience and it is easy to avoid aimless browsing. However I think that this can involve slowing down in a sense. If I were to share a tyepscript of me using the web _interactvely_ through the command line, without a mouse, without using a graphics layer (no X11, etc.), or even a framebuffer, without a terminal emulator (e.g., no cut/paste), let alone a graphical web browser, IMO it could not compare in speed to someone using all those conveniences. Like you, I am using underpowered computers with limited resources. People doing "screencasts" always seem to have very fast computers, for lack of a better term. Graphical browsers and the web look very snappy in those videos. Alas, this has not been my experience with graphical browsers over the last 25 years, at least not the popular ones we are forced to use.

Thankfully I am not trying to the same things as one does with a graphical web browser. I do not have to compete with those videos. I am not working on a different way to "browse", I am working on an alternative to "web browsing". I am using the web in ways that do not require a web browser, e.g., using a sitemap to HTTP/1.1 pipeline all of a website's pages over a single TCP connection to a single text file that can be split into chunks and read/searched with less/more (or Links). AFAIK, this cannot be done with a graphical web browser, no matter how "modern". And it is unlikely a "modern" web browser will ever facilitate it. Because it allows the www user to read www content offline, safely out of reach from "programmatic advertising".
True but there are some recent developments in the area of making them rechargeable.
They only fake support epub - when you use "send to Kindle" to send an epub, it gets quietly converted by Amazon to either mobi or azw3 (I don't know exactly which of those two but it seems like azw3 is more likely). I assume they use kindlegen to do the conversion, even though Calibre does better azw3 conversion. If you're using SE ebooks on a Kindle, you should simply download our premade azw3 files as I guarantee they'll be better than whatever Amazon does to an epub sent over email.

We accept translations into English, but the translations need to have been published before 1927 for them to be in the US public domain. See our collections policy: https://standardebooks.org/contribute/collections-policy

The Communist Manifest is already in our catalog: https://standardebooks.org/ebooks/karl-marx_friedrich-engels...
You mean to tell me you didn’t have to read “Secret Babies for my Best Friend's Dad: An Age Gap Romance” in English class?!
> No bug, bochs just stops at the first instruction. You should type c to let it run.

So is it a major bug, or not?
IIRC it seems impractical because it was intended for nuclear weapons research or something like that. It's a military boondoggle.
I agree with you entirely, nearly all of the companies I've encountered that are trying to get kubernetes working have:

1. Made poor language choices that require them to over complicate their architecture to scale things up. Places where a single golang binary would work and instead you have queues and callbacks and 5 container images because at each road block they just added some new "thing" to make it work.

2. do not even have the base infrastructure automated for any of this to run on, so instead they throw kubernetes on top of it and cross their fingers that the underlying hosts will just magically stay up. And every email about degraded hardware from AWS nearly gives you a heart attack.

I guess overall I'm sad that instead of trying to make smaller and tighter machine images that boot quickly in order to automate availability, we (the industry) added another layer (containers) to just complicate things more.
There are so many different genres and styles of music it's impossible, and often harmful, to generalize upon how every genre and part of music works... But there are a few common recurring themes within the industry.

I think there are many people i the industry that wax poetic about how things work and success principles, but we never acknowledge how much the music industry is based on subversion of everyone else to promote and victimize major (manufactured) pop stars and to subvert independent (unsigned) artists unless they are willing to submit to the larger industry's bidding.

Songs like Party in the USA are what gets millions of views, while the local guy playing guitar in a coffee shop pays money to publish his music on spotify, and only gets 4 streams and quits after 4 years of losing money. There has really not been innovation within music anywhere but the indie market, but big industry (The guys with huge houses and record labels downtown) are the ones collecting a lot more money than the artists, and they keep innovating ways to keep that the norm.

I'm a realist, not a cynic... I've been making music and working within the industry for many years now and it's what keeps me alive. I've seen known musicians dealing drugs just to raise money to promote their albums, I've seen singers doing "very un-desirable" things just to get an album completed because they don't have the money to getting things done, seen nightclubs that solely thrive to sell drugs because the music does not make money. I've avoided all of the negative aspects of working in music.

There is no trend to revive the past in music, it's large companies and rich old investors that own the catalog rights to music that are promoting old songs on platforms by paying for promotion and then getting their other rich film industry buddies to throw those vintage songs into their reboot movies to try to generate buzz for songs that were already hits from the past. Very little innovation involved in that.
this has to be a joke, it makes no sense...
It's the same lack of diversity as mining towns. Where are the people who are not working in the tech industry? Where are the people building cool arts projects?

The lack of diversity refers to the fact that way too much of the people in this area are just worker drones that go to the corporate campus to work, eat at the corporate cafeteria, commute back home, and don't interact much with the community.
Yes - that's one of the main points of the project!
Global shortage of fibre optic cable threatens digital growth
I write my own powershell script for taking screenshots periodically

https://gist.github.com/soruly/889d926fcd4b2b8e8dc113a100b9d...
so the solution to racism... is being racist against different people?? what even
The robot didn't do anything. Some humans rented a machine and inexpertly operated it, no different than if I rented a back hoe and dug up a power line.

There is nothing to contest when people observe this fact.
By "can't be used" do you mean by unjustified whiners, or is there a real problem?

If you're including this existing filesystem you shouldn't have any relevant patents to worry about, and the clause about letting the user write their own firmware shouldn't be an issue for 99% of products.

Is there anything else I missed in the differences between v2 and v3?
I am Baymax. On a scale of one to ten, how would you rate your pain?
Maybe all that hot rock could be used to produce steam which would run turbines which would produce electricity, which would be again used to power these machines, or perhaps more simply just fed into the grid?
In theory, blazor is really neat. But last I checked you have to either go fully thin-client (server side blazor) or have an annoyingly large initial download (client side blazor). Which is probably fine if everyone's wired to the company network, but maybe less so if there's mobile involved or the general public needs access from the local coffee shop.
If you're following the article's suggestion of using docker to replace makefiles and/or run build processes in docker and just spit out the final product using --output, the you will build the image on every single compile. And I'd try to give docker credit for caching all the layers it can, but make caches results too so it's not necessarily even winning there.
You're equivocating between intent and purpose. It doesn't matter here why someone makes a personal attack; it matters what role the personal attack plays in their statement. That doesn't require reading their mind, merely reading their statement.
That is very far from all there is to it. You leveled accusations at me, in direct violation of HN guidelines, that misrepresented what I said and did.

Mouse models are of course used throughout medical research. There is a sizeable literature on correct use of mouse models. Alzheimer's researchers have, very clearly, wholly ignored them. Probably the most central requirement of use of mouse models is demonstrating that they have something concrete to do with the illness modeled, something that in decades they have not bothered with.

Your noisy defense of people who have manifestly wasted tens of $billions of taxpayers' money over decades is based on nothing.
It's really not that bad of an idea for anyone, I can only speak for VSCode but what you're talking about isn't a huge gap from WSL2.

Except rather than using WSL2 for your local remote (confused yet? I am) sessions.

Hardware _is_ cheap, if MacOS can't support a decent enough environment for Docker, provide your Engineers with some cheap hardware like a NUC or even a remote AWS Linux EC2 instance or similar and get a native *nix environment that way.
My fault, fair enough, I should not have used any analogy here. You could also go to the limit and say that each runner did not have same initial starting conditions from birth. At some point, we have to distinguish between event conditions (which you rightly pointed out) and the inherit inequality between each runner (otherwise sports would cease to exist). It becomes pedantic and tiring to discuss these kinds of extremes.

Regardless, it is interesting to inquire what is the distribution of probabilities and how far wide is the spread between the worst scramble and the best scramble (perfect cube which would be not very likely). It can be easily accounted for by providing each player the same random scramble of cubes. Far easier than controlling altitude of each sporting venue for running.
Introverts are ‘routinely passed up’ for promotions
2000 cycles for 200 - 250 000 km.

Unless you fast charge to 100% regularly.
http://archive.today/2022.07.25-041854/https://www.ft.com/co...
If you're willing to go down the f# rabbit hole there's also Fable which I need to try but I've heard very good things about.