skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Odysee is better anyway. I tried using Bitchute because I wanted an alternative to YouTube, but the formatting is trash, and politics is the only form of entertainment there. It is also very much a free speech platform, but I find that the community is much better. At least with Odysee you can get documentaries and other forms of entertainment besides politics
Imagine being able to operate toggles in the program to not include news sources you disagree with. The horror of freedom!
The firstOf, the other 2 are ["no", "yes"];

In the short term businesses can optimize and at times modernize. When this is done the customers/citizen will pay until the end of time.
If you read TFA there is a perfectly reasonable suggestion that the gun should be only accessible from outside the capsule, thus reserving it for its intended use after landing. That suggestion was rebuffed.
See:

* DBC file is a proprietary format that describes the data over a CAN bus.: http://socialledge.com/sjsu/index.php/DBC_Format

* OpenDBC: democratize access to car decoder rings: https://github.com/commaai/opendbc
> The bare bones godoc is generally fine because the language is so easy.

No, it's not.

> Python needs the examples because most of the libraries have no types so you would have no idea whats happening without examples

That’s not the main reason examples and narrative explanations in documentation are useful, but if the false belief that it is has helpe to fuel the Python documentation culture, I’m not going to complain too much.
I'm actually not making any value judgement. It's an observation. One of the effects of fewer children is that companies that previously marketed towards children, now market mostly towards adults that are still able to live out their childhood fantasies.

onestly, when it comes to families, I actually think this is a good thing, because Disney, MLB, etc, are terrible organizations that don't deserve much support. Disney happily kowtows to China's every whim, and its new content is ultimately not that great (save for a select few films). Professional sports has ruined our education system in this country (school-to-pro-sports pipeline), that disproportionately affects minority males, who are encouraged to spend more time attempting to achieve a dream that they are unlikely to (making a sports team) and little time doing those things that will almost certainly help them in life.
Yeah, The Sun isn't a great source. Reuters' title on this is "Flights briefly disrupted at UK's Luton airport as heat damages runway"
Learning in this sense means it’s able to extrapolate to unseen data (I.e., it’s learned correlations that are inherent to the problem, not just inherent in the training data). Memorizing, on the other hand, implies that it will do very well on any examples in the domain of the training data, and will break (sometimes pretty hilariously) on unseen data.

The fact that refitting once a day improves real world performance actually makes me think that the problem/data they work on is highly non-stationary, not that the model is memorizing. If it was purely memorizing then the model would perform poorly on all non-training data, and would not work for even one day.

To your point about large datasets - the large datasets are what allow learning to take place. With the most common forms of models we have now, they will memorize when they only have a few examples, and only “learn” when the training data is large enough. There is work to improve learning from a handful of examples, but in many of these cases they require a model that was already trained on the domain in question, and then are specialized to a specific use-case.
Or shoot the bears from the helicopter, full "Apocalypse now" style!
LGBT housing is safe for LGBT folks, particularly because it is either shared by or run by queer folks who are much less likely to discriminate or do violence against you because you are queer.

Regular housing offers no such guarantees. Maybe it's fine, maybe it's dangerous.
That's very true. I just wish there was a middle ground. I'd pay for a service that just runs a managed version of Gitea. Something similar to installing WordPress or a PHP bulletin board system to an old-fashioned web host. Hell, I could probably do just that if there was a super low end version of these types of services that will run with just PHP and Apache.

EDIT: Oh my god. I think I understand Sqlite and Fossil a little better now.
Media propaganda promoting that view of "science" isn't helping much.
I think ghaff gave a pretty good answer as well, but here's some more nuance:

> Does that mean, the owners of the platform to have to pay the other platforms?

No.

Tons of "value-add platforms" exist like this: wrap a bunch of open source up, add a UX layer on top and offer support. As long as you comply with the terms of the license, you can do just that. And many licenses (MIT/BSD/friends) are often complied with by merely redisplaying that software's license in the documentation or on a LICENSES file somewhere.

But there are licenses that are less permissive. The GPL is the one most people think of. If you modify and distribute GPL licensed software to others, you have to share your source. How do you dodge this? SaaS: change the GPL licensed software as much as you want, never distribute it, but instead allow users to interact with it over the network. Totally compliant.

Hence, we got AGPLv3, with this big provision:

> Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, if you modify the Program, your modified version must prominently offer all users interacting with it remotely through a computer network (if your version supports such interaction) an opportunity to receive the Corresponding Source of your version by providing access to the Corresponding Source from a network server at no charge, through some standard or customary means of facilitating copying of software.

Now, if your bundled SaaS solution includes AGPLv3 software, you have to make its code available.

There are interesting questions here ... if you take an AGPLv3 software and slap a nice GUI under it, is that "linking" under AGPLv3? Possibly. There's at least an argument to be made.

> Is there any kind of license that protects the interest of opensource developers.

If your interest is building software and releasing it openly while keeping it away from people who want to monetize it, traditionally the use of AGPL does just that. Google, Facebook, Amazon – I have first or second-hand knowledge that any attempt to bring AGPL into those ecosystems is a hard no without exception.

But, what "interest" are you trying to protect? I have released software under the BSD license that has been adopted in commercial applications. I'm fine with that; it was in my interest to release it under the BSD license, that's all.

Licenses matter. Pick the one that encodes what you'd like to achieve.
It eliminates the Most Vexing Parse.

Consider this C++ code:

Foo bar();

A programmer could make simple mistake thinking that is declaring a variable of type Foo. Carbon eliminates this by having explicit keywords for variable and function declaration. (This style is much more Rust based than C++)

fn bar() -> Foo;
var bar : Foo;

It makes parsing easier for both the users and maintainers of the language.
> And let's not forget to tax the damage they cause in terms of pollution. Keeping things in the air requires way more energy than moving them over land.

What are you comparing this to? Does this include the energy and pollution needed to move a human, and a vehicle to safely accommodate that human?

> And there are other negative externalities (noise and visual pollution), and also physical danger (these things might crash or collide).

Are these not also the case for human-driven vehicles, which endanger more people (if a motorbike crashes then the rider has low odds), and create noise and visual pollution? I assume the latter means "I don't like how it looks"; if so then does a road look nicer than a drone your eye can't resolve unless you're fairly close to it?
This is such a stretch.

> Families were bigger in the 60s so things had to be cheaper for families to afford it.

Consider that perhaps your causality is reversed. Families are smaller now because existing is more expensive relative to wages.
That Google DC video doesn't actually show how the data center is setup or operates. It shows all the security layers to make people feel like their data is safe (from physical attacks, not cyberattacks of course). You see more about Google Data center hard disk shredders than you do how they manage and cool their servers. The differences are more about preventing humans from getting in and access to the machines. The actual racks, cooling, etc are pretty similar in many respects. There's more redundancy in Google data centers, theoretically. But the reality is not what it might seem in terms of actual data center resilience.
Do we know for sure there are no weapons on the ISS?
Please also note that some products from "Indie Hackers" are actually from a small team (e.g., 5+ people) that raised a"tiny" family & friends round (e.g., $500k) :)

In the purest form of "indie hacker" (i.e., a single person team + use your own saving + maybe part-time outside day job), % of $100k+/yr revenue is way lower than 5%.
See https://github.com/jbranchaud/til

I think this guy pioneered it many moons ago, I've been doing something similar ever since I saw that.

Previously...

- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11068902

- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22908044
It would be interesting to ask people after the test:

Have you been diagnosed with, or do you believe you have, dyslexia, ADHD, visual impairment, or other reading challenges?

It would also be interesting to ask people if they felt it was easier to read with the new tech or the old way. Speed is one metric, but subjective impressions of reading ease are also relevant.
i think the change is too little, too late.

Historically, nuclearprojects take in avg 7.5 years to come online. [1]

Thats a long time, almost 2 full terms of a presidency (US). Plenty of time for political winds to change.

Instead of relabeling a rotten apple as 'edible' to investors, the EU should put something fresh that can be quickly consumed.

[1]https://euanmearns.com/how-long-does-it-take-to-build-a-nucl...
If you're _living_ with someone they're likely to figure it out. This is for helping people find flatmates.

Even for non-flatmate scenarios, some landlords are remarkably nosy. Also, in many jurisdictions trans people may have legal docs in a name they don't use anymore... the list goes on.

It's also reasonably common for people to be discriminated against because people _incorrectly think that they are LGBT_, incidentally.
There's peerpub and retractionwatch, but that's about it I believe. Science is inherently decentralised
This doesn't seem like a serious suggestion when the conclusion is little more than "austerity for thee, not for me". To shut people out of enjoying things because of perceived "luxuries" that add very little to the experience seems misguided at best. Once the parking lot is renovated, it is not suddenly justified. That is an expense that causes prices to rise, thus affecting the set of people who can access the service. It has real material consequences.
> see 10g in that document, no?

“Acceleration up to 10 g's,” with tolerance for “experiencing g forces more than an order of magnitude higher.”

The tough bit is guidance system survival. For Russia, reliant on Chinese solid state tech, 50g is an accomplishment. For China or the U.S., the task is more trivial. (There is a broader point of blinded sensors.)

> don't think there is anything anywhere else that's closely comparable in capabilities to the Iskander

Because there are better tactical tools for almost every mission. Russia can’t maintain that diversity of materiel, so they monobody onto the Iskander.
Is a pistol an effective countermeasure for an attacking bear?
AsciiDoc or reStructuredText. Maybe Org Mode, but I don’t know as much about it.
The problem with C++ is it keeps getting better. There was a time when Rust was interesting to me but then C++11 came out. Then they kept improving it
More like runnyway. This is bad engineering
Same occurance on the M25 in 2003.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_European_heat_wave#Unit...
No, there have been all kinds cases of enforcement action in EU where the user was informed but the employer could not justify the violation of privacy; in general EU law and especially in privacy law it's quite frequent that some explicit "consent" clause in employment contracts (essentially, if it's a standard clause in all agreements and "take it or leave it") is treated as not representing true consent and void.

The largest example probably is the 2020 GDPR fine of 35 million euro for clothing retailer H&M for violating the privacy of their employees, despite the employees being informed of that.
I've used tools like this, but built into products that want selectors as implementation detail for non-technical ppl. (Think AppCues flows or Intercom product tours.)

They've all generally picked horrible selectors which then leads to getting a dev involved to provide a better one. So the angle you have on selector intelligence is the most compelling aspect to me.

How readily can new rules be added? And do you have lots of rules specific to different frameworks? For example if I'm using FrameworkA and it loves to splash ids like Component-12345 where 12345 counts up from zero, the id will be very alluring to basic selector generator tools. One stop identifier. However the example I give is an unstable id because every execution loads components differently and the ids will be assigned differently next time
Are people really rejecting a whole project because one of 6 options is Gab?

Do you people not use yt-dlp (or youtube-dl) because some of the sources they support can have more "extreme" content as well?

I'd understand it if the project was built by the same people who work at Gab, or meant for Gab, or something like that, so there really is an associated. But there is not, so why blame the project for it?

For all we know, the author could be reading Gab because sometimes you're curious to see what all the extremists are up to.
Is there a tool that automatically forwards every URL + HTML of the page you visit to a webhook so you could write an endpoint that would index everything?

If not, I would love to see this add a "forward to webhook" option. I would be happy to write up a real backend that parsed the content and indexed it.

Actually, there are lots of OS projects for this: https://github.com/quickwit-oss/tantivy, https://github.com/valeriansaliou/sonic, https://github.com/mosuka/phalanx, https://github.com/meilisearch/MeiliSearch, etc...

I would think that with the thousands (tens of thousands?) of pages I would index just browsing each year it would be relativity easy to find ways to automatically expand the index to include links that appear multiple times in those pages or some other heuristic
Sadly to this day there are people who have been politicized into disbelieving the science, which has been very clear for a long time.

I fear for our ability to deal with the problems of humanity when so much of our politics is easily fooled people fighting ideological wars for the benefit of others.
My adblocker is blocking the link got some reason.
Go read up on the Almaz.

The Soviets mounted a 23mm cannon on one of their early stations.

Long before the Space Force.
Show HN: Play Wordle using the 5-letter words on any webpage
I fully agree. In addition charge back all dividends paid as global warming was long a scientific fact. Profits always must come with responsibilities. Time that people who profited are paying their bills.
I didn't provide logic; I only asked a question. The legal system tends not to be that cut-and-dry. I don't know the answer as I am not a lawyer.
"Anti-choice" is purely descriptive. They are opposed to you having that choice.

It's less pejorative than the implication that "pro-life" connotes that the opposition is "anti-life". Few pro-lifers seem to put any effort into guaranteeing life for anybody -- often in favor of capital punishment, and practically never advocating policies that preserve life such as health care.

"Anti-choice" is about the most dispassionate, accurate label I can apply. There is a choice that the wish to deny. Any other term is a euphemism.
Pizza HTTP Status Codes
Interesting. Having worked at Uber I've been curious why there aren't more of these types of services available to the public.
That username...
How straightforward is interop between C++ and rust?
Maybe the e-mail is not-so-legitimate.

Two cases:

1) you logged into your Paypal account and the payment is registered there

2) you logged into your Paypal account and the payment is NOT registered there

If #1 you actually made the payment or someone accessed your Paypal account and made it (your account has been hacked), you need to contact Paypal through their site or official telephone number to ask for chargeback.

If #2 you have been targeted by a phishing attempt, there was no payment of $789.97, so you have nothing to be refunded of.

From what you posted, it seems much more likely to be #2, but I cannot understand your reference to "injecting" the fake contact number, in this case the whole invoice (and e-mail message) is fake.
I predict that we get to have actual, fast, non-partisan progress when it comes to the energy and emission problems in the near future. I'm hopeful.

Progressives have been pushing to phase out harmful energy sources (among many other things) since more than half a century across the developed world. There was always push-back from conservative voices, NIMBYs and just generally ignorant people, but that is starting to weaken and we see more and more convergence.

- First, the concerns, typically based on scientific evidence, was simply ignored.

- When voices got louder, there was a push-back based on economic concerns, still ignoring the threat of pollution.

- Meanwhile a wave of propaganda started to saw doubt about the effects of pollution, climate change and so on.

- At first it was said that climate change will not happen.

- Then it was said that climate change is not man made.

- Denying climate change was becoming unpopular, so they started talking about feasibility, nitpicking, ad-hominem/ridicule and distraction.

All of this time everyone could have invested time, money and brain power into shifting to renewable energy, energy storage, energy efficiency, insulation etc.

And now since more and more weather changes and catastrophes are actually happening, there are suddenly people from the same camp talking about bringing back nuclear. Why? Because of an political issue that nobody predicted and is completely unrelated to the global threat of climate change.

But this is a good thing. It is the first step to realization that everyone should put much more effort into sustainable energy and peripheral issues. It might happen for the 'wrong' reasons, but it will happen.
Why not, though?
After all, I'm sure a large university like MIT has a lot to gain from a site like this that promotes them to the top of the list as someone who publishes genuine papers.
Go read up on the Soviet Almaz station from the 1970s, and reconcile that with the Space Force from the 2020s.
THIS.

To me the the most important thing about note taking is clicking a button and immediately being able to write something, either pc or phone. I use google keep because it's the most straight forward way for me and it is synced. I would love a replacement (because it's so limited, and don't like the desktop client...), but it needs to be as convenient.
I am shocked that nobody has mentioned that aside from the privacy and national security concern related to data collection, another major issue is that the chinese can literally program our Youth. They can run psychological programs, influence campaigns.

TikTok is an ominous name. It's literally creating tics in teenagers. TikTok also seems like a psychological weapon, which is a ticking time bomb until the Chinese take over the world (their stated goal)

Tic defined as "an idiosyncratic and habitual feature of a person's behavior." Yesterday, Tucker Carlson (bad man) did a segment on the difference between American TikTok and Chinese Douyin. It's clear that the Chinese are curating the algorithms differently. Douyin content is made to be good for society, whereas TikTok content is degenerate. The algorithm is everything.

China has every incentive to push our young people to be mental cases and TikTok has the potential to do this.

For example, TikTok is likely speeding up the rate at which teen girls experience rapid onset gender dysphoria. A teen may be confused about who they are, they watch one or two videos related to the topic, then they are sent down a rabbit hole of this content.

I am happy to see the FCC of this administration speaking out. TikTok was going to be banned by the last administration but this administration put a stop to that in their effort to roll back all of Trump (bad man) policy.
I didn't get back to this in a timely manner but I wanted to thank you.
As I replied to someone else, I am simply asking a question. I am not a lawyer and I don't know what constitutes "housing" for the purposes of HUD regulation.
The limit is 80, not 100.

I run into the limit occasionally, but it's possible to take out some phrases from titles and still have them be accurate. If I do, I'll comment on my own submission making a note of it.

Titles are for a summary of a question. The question itself is supposed to be expanded and elaborated on in the text of the submission.
It's the affordances, in my opinion. Whoever designed the physical hardware was an unsung genius.
Tell me about the last time you believe the political climate got less toxic.
In the anecdotes provided by my peers, LGBTQ friendly or LGBTQ only type of housing is rife for violence and bullying. You'd think that naturally people who are pushed to the fringes would be kind to each other, and it just isn't the case. There's just magnified amount of animosity that can quickly grow especially.

So while I applaud the good intention, the actual reality is pretty grim, the ideal solution would be to let LGBTQ people live like any other people. However, we decided to label and group and trying to get them to create their own bubbles and I feel like this is not diversity but systematic exclusion.

Pretty soon we will see LGBTQ ghettos and the same level of exploitation that comes when you concentrate people with all sorts of personal boundaries/expectations that are not aligned. The idea that LGBTQ are somehow all united and see themselves on a flat hierarchy is misplaced and its a recipe for disaster.

It should be like in Japan, where the mainstream isn't really forced to adopt any particular views or forced to hire people from said groups but still get along respectably and more importantly, people simply do not put so much emphasis on sexuality like in Judeo-Christian societies.

Lastly, LGBTQ in Japan does not wonder about getting killed by some flag bearing closeted and insecure, violent and poor groups. Kindergartens in Japan aren't having mass shooter drills or building bulletproof panic lockers.

Neither country is better than the other, each has its own ups and downs but

In Japan you can have gay/trans walk around and they aren't worried for their safety or facing violence from strangers.

In West you can have gay/trans marriages and rights but they are walking around fearing for violence from strangers even in "liberal progressive" hoods.

Japan is also in process of introducing gay marriages, trans rights, albeit slow.
>No language lives forever
Except C. C will always be with us.