skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm not sure, just read this and thought interesting...
> or the pay being that unfair.

Isn't that the equivalent of other jobs in other industries where no qualification is required?
Yep, never taken SNRIs - for me it was straight prozac. Side effects while on it weren't pretty though.
The iPhone forces Apple Music to self-start if nothing else is using the speaker when you auto-connect with a car Bluetooth system.

Kind of like how Windows 10 forces you to use Microsoft Edge as a pdf viewer no matter how many times you switch to Adobe or how many settings you change.

Apple doesn't want you to forget about Apple Music.

> auto-magically restores itself somehow
iCloud. Apple Music needs something to play.
However mobile devices have a dual role (in many people's lives these days) as being the custodian of all their MFA setup. weakening mobile security (which this arguably may do) could have an impact there.

Also "large format computing devices" are moving more to the lockdown model, at least partially due to the security problems inherent in allowing end users to install/run whatever they want :)
Minimum competence to earn a living as a basketball player is much higher than minimum competence required to earn a living as a software engineer.
Yes, exactly. And how many of these projects go to any effort to pin their transitive dependencies?

In my experience, this is basically no one; in fact I've seen many (most?) projects not even pin the versions on their top-level dependencies. (Ask yourself how many times you've seen just "numpy" as a dependency without any version bound. Far too often in my experience.)

And this is exactly why stuff breaks: even when the root dependencies are pinned (and are they?), a transitive dependency could get upgraded and break something (or fail to build entirely).
I would allow the same approaches taken today. I don’t want any of these things, and would buy an android phone if I did.
> Someone else's opinion isn't crap.

Correct, but what has that to do with anything? They did not give an opinion but claimed several points as fact. These claims were crap.
In an absolute sound quality sense, yes.

But they also pick up peoples' gross mouth noises. You hear them chewing food, wheezing when they have a cold, or even eating food in waaaaay too much detail.

Obviously mute buttons exist but... I've had multiple remote coworkers with boom mics and even if they rememeber to mute 90% of the time over the course of a year that other 10% really adds up lol
Then why were the streetcar lines being bought by what effectively was a shell company owned by the corporations that would profit the most from the sale of those buses?
“why was 2007 such a good year for teenagers?”

Because smart phones were about to ruin their lives.
Long live to SaaS products, no longer our problems hahaha... Going to cry in a corner.
It's the norm, rather than the exception, here in Europe. My employment contract is set through collective bargaining and I work at one of the largest tech employers in Switzerland. Being represented by a union is just standard fare. I don't understand the hostility to it across the pond.
You're throwing a lot of numbers around in an attempt to look like you know what you're talking about. Ballistics and wound cavities are much, much more complicated than just "more momentum == more deadly".

Example: The US military just replaced the .223 with .277 Fury for exactly the reason that the .223 is _too fast_ and doesn't shed enough energy when hitting a target.

Furthermore, you're mixing grains (gr) and grams (g). A 55gr (grain) bullet is 3.56 grams. A 0.9oz musket ball is 25.5 grams. So your momentum calculations are (11'067-13'209) grams * m/s for a musket and 3'581 grams * m/s. So the musket actually has 3+ times more momentum than the .223 round.

Musket balls are absolutely huge, there are effectively zero modern rifles which shoot a .640 caliber round. The .223 is a very small rifle round.

https://www.quora.com/Would-it-be-worse-to-be-shot-with-a-mu...
Yes, but people are still being told by their psychiatrists that depression is caused by low serotonin levels as if it were an objective fact. Seeing this happen made me lose a lot of trust in the medical profession. Is it like this for all illnesses or just mental ones?
The obvious way to do that is via the fuel tax, where the more you pay the more you use.

The reality is probably that it's not that well coupled to any cause, and really it's just a way to farm money from the majority of the country, who need to use motor transport to live their lives. The advertised political reason will change depending on the concerns of the populace at the time.
> The issue is what if you have to use a specific app to access some service or community.

Such compulsions are the real problem. In a free society, nobody should be compelled to have a phone at all, let alone install software on one. Government services in particular should never be gated in this way. If no compulsion exists, then there is no problem with people having the choice to use any appstore they wish.

If by 'have to' you mean something along the lines of "My brother keeps badgering me to install WhatsApp" then the answer is to simply say "No." Real example. He texts me instead.
Heatwave led to London firefighters’ busiest day since second world war
"Affected" is the correct term here. People do use those wrong all the time. Honestly it's not always that they don't know which one (well ok it probably is, but doesn't have to be), but I find typing comments online my brain interchanges some things like that even though I know which one is correct.
Twitter Worker Accused of Spying for Saudi Arabia Heads to Trial
I don't follow. The theories made prediction that came empty handed again and again.

Sure, absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence, but you can search for star spangled swan only so much, before looking into alternatives.
I honestly can understand that mindset “Whatever dude X does, however weird, obnoxious, or morally questionable, I am going to vote for him.”

I just can’t if you believe in democracy, however it’s still 50% that doesn’t, although 30% that just want to “win” is still weird.
The crisis flow state as you call it is great every once in a while but it's not sustainable long term.
TeXmacs: Math operators as objs, subscript rendering, and mild copy-pasting bug
Even weirder... I've come to think code coverage may be related more to security / safety than correctness. People often think they're buying safety when they go from 80% coverage to 100% coverage, and I don't think that's always true. And while it's a laudable goal, there are probably better ways to confirm safety than assuring you have 100% code coverage.

We've noticed that you can still have all sorts of problems in code that has 100% coverage. We started using a TLA+ like "environment" to automagically prove assertions about our code (mostly things like "there's only one path that gets you to this counter := counter + 1 line and there's a mutex around it.") It's a pain in the rear, but probably less of a pain in the rear than trying to prove that sort of thing with traditional tests and an exhortation that you have to have 100% coverage.
Dr. Becky has a good video on new evidence against dark matter [1] that I find super interesting, especially new evidence for the External Field Effect, where the anomaly in the rotation of galaxies (which is what dark matter is needed to explain) can be explained by the gravitational pull of other nearby galaxies.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvmwqx5vjps
If that is the case, I have a hard time believing it's still true on any model past iPhone X. There's plenty of space to fit a 3.5mm jack in there, I would happily trade any/all of the FaceID hardware or Lidar components for a headphone connector.
I'm sure a malicious programmer could do a great deal of harm with GPT3 or DALL-E, but I'm still not seeing how these programs suggest that computers are going to take over the world. At some point it simply becomes an act of faith to assume technology is going to progress to the point where robots can self replicate, achieve sentience, and achieve autonomy from humanity. Phillip K Dick wrote a science fiction short story with such a premise entitled "second variety" in 1953.

It's not a new idea. It doesn't seem to be subject to evidence, because you can't really prove a negative, can you? If a breakthrough will never happen to allow machines to take over the world, there's no way to prove it.
Except they literally are emissions free. Nothing is emitted from the vehicle over its operable lifetime.

Carbon footprint and emissions are not the same. Even if fueling via electricity had as large a carbon footprint as gasoline (it doesn't), it would still be better because it moves all that pollution out of urban environments.
There are significant negative externalities to driving.
"Which was great to get the initial people to convert, and get the infrastructure in place. But now it's time to tax them. "

Maybe in Norway, and only Norway. Every other nation should be quadrupling-down on EV incentives. Or 10 fold. Or 20.
The DPF framework is moving towards WASM build targets;

https://cardinal.kx.studio - web version of the VCV Rack wrapper Cardinal

https://github.com/DISTRHO/Cardinal/issues/287
Really, Google doesn't have an entire org called "dcops"?
It's important to realize where doomer culture came from. It largely began as a response to feel good messages which were decorating the truth of things at the benefit of no one.

The main issue being, doomer culture can be embraced as a way to accept things that are beyond your power and double efforts on what you can change, or as a way to toss away all efforts and be in a perpetual state of not caring. It also serves as a counter to society continuing to polish turds.
Coming from Bootstrap, is there a good learning resource for Tailwind layouts? Bootstrap's grid is very obvious/explicit (rows and col) whereas Tailwind has more magic. Thanks!
> No quick and easy access to mood-altering drugs

LSD was synthetized in 1938, its psychedelic potential discovered in 1943 and it was used both by psychiatry and for spiritual/recreational purposes through the 50s and 60s until Nixon started "war on drugs".
Nah, we all know that there are dozens of entities out there who would _love_ to publish the "Sunk US sub causing elevated radiation levels!" article. The incentive is high. So the absence of the report does mean something.
> That the government don't ring-fence it to use on road maintenance is irrelevant.

It's not irrelevant to the quoted section, which is the only thing the previous poster was replying to.
Ask any elder boomer who is an LA native about this, and be prepared for a looong discussion.

I think that as with so many things the red cars in LA both better and worse than cars. I think they were especially better for younger people. But I think they were inseparable from a pre-car culture, ultimately.
That is a detail and they could easily change that if they didn't already.
No, I use Jitsi for the call its P2P
This continues to happen in our 2012 Toyota Prius. U2 song “California” from the Sounds of Innocence soundtrack. Don’t remember ever downloading it.
would be so funny if they... just removed all the JS!
Coin market cap is also a made up term for alt coins. They equate it to how MV of a company is share price * outstanding shares. For a coin you can mint a million coins, and sell 5 of them for 10$ (to yourself most likely), and boom crypto exchanges list it as having a 100M Mkt cap, despite liquidity being zero. If it was truly liquid market all of these are worthless.
“affected” should have been used. It is a common mistake to confuse the two.
It was real, but it's not sufficient to explain the mass movement away from streetcars in general. They didn't even purchase a majority of streetcars in the US, and this movement away from streetcars happened in most of the Western world.

US streetcars had real systemic disadvantages mostly stemming from when they showed up in our society; at the turn of the century in uncongested roads when the dollar was strongly tied to gold. This had a couple effects:

* they showed up at the turn of the century, so just in the '40s and '50s as investment started in highways they needed expensive lifecycle replacement. Buses were seen as more flexible and could use this new infrastructure being built with no additional work, so many municipalities willingly switched to buses to take advantage.

* they showed up at the turn of the century, when having a paved road in a city was not a norm, and so contracts allowing for the construction of streetcar lines also expected the streetcar companies to pay maintenance on the paving. Gas taxes usually only pay for major interstate and state roads, but streetcars paid for local streets. Undoing this was not popular since it would require cities to raise new taxes, and would relieve evil streetcar monopolies of a burden.

* they showed up when roads were not terribly congested, so they weren't built with the expectation of needing to be separated from heavy traffic. Cars changed this equation, but dedicating road space to streetcars was just either not on the radar or seen as a giveaway to evil companies.

* they showed up when the dollar was very strong and tied to gold. Laws authorizing streetcar operation also usually involved explicitly tying their operation to a specified flat fare (usually a nickel). This fare was not tied to inflation, and raising the fare or eliminating limits on fares was politically DOA, a tax on the working man and a giveaway to the evil streetcar monopolies.
Sounding Out the Acoustic Integrated Circuit
Thanks, I appreciate this.

I don't think this practice is widespread, which is exactly why I made a point about human engineering in my original post. But I do appreciate that solutions like this exist, and I should look into driving more of this sort of thing in my projects.
So what if you posted content to Youtube, and then soon afterwards, issued a DMCA complaint against your own content, using another account / identity that you own? What effect would that have on other subsequent DMCA complaints?
Which I guess is completely fine in, let's say, the hands of Somali pirates :shrug:
Agree that a "play" command is being sent from vehicle. This autostarts Apple Music if nothing else is using the speaker.
Guns _are_ designed to kill, and yet they (rifles) still kill around the same number people as pools. I take this as further evidence that the "assault weapon problem" is blown completely out of proportion in the media.
Funeral's don't have to be about suffering - Death isn't the end of the story for many people of faith. Leaving a legacy to the next generation is quite possibly the most meaningful thing we are capable of doing, no?

In terms of the lens of the Regret Minimization Framework (for me) I would regret not having the family I'm leaving my legacy to at my funeral.
It's not the high level aspects, but the low level ones.

Audio DSP is doing a lot of math. CPUs are good at it, sure, but modern synths and effects are legitimately pushing up against how much math a CPU core can evaluate in the few milliseconds you have to render (in the worst case, low latency realtime rendering time is actually dominated not by how much DSP you can do, but how long it takes to move audio from userland to kernel and out to the hardware and back).

Some of the DSP algorithms are really hard to optimize with SIMD, in fact most of the common audio DSP operations can't be trivially converted to SIMD forms (and when they are, they aren't N times faster for N more lanes). Filters are especially tricky because converting the math from one form to another changes the topology of the signal flow, which is only equivalent in the steady-state of non-linear and time-invariant filters. DAWs are using non-linear time variant filters that are being modulated in realtime, so your super fast SIMD optimized biquads might not sound as good as the converted SVF that can't be trivially optimized (there are tricks, but it's a game of tradeoffs).

And there's the other aspect of the scene that there's just a lot of bad or naive code out there. There is a lot of know-how floating around, but a lot of tools are designed by folks without it to begin with. That's a good thing because it makes a lot of interesting and cool tools, but it also means that institutional knowledge is kind of locked away. It doesn't help that some of the largest examples for newcomers (JUCE's DSP module, RAFX/Aspik with the accompanying text), as well as classic (and new!) textbooks teach people to do things in the least performant way possible, and those algorithms make it into production.
Not really. They exist because cars are required. If we all became able to live our lives purely with cycling then cycling would be taxed.
Hm, unable to reproduce. Perhaps you have some weird browser extension installed or something intercepting DNS requests?
Suicide is usually due to distress than clinical depression. This is why suicide hotlines work at all.
Why is Firefox another story?
> One would think that if there is truly a Europe wide market for such an unlocked device a competitor should be able to challenge Apple and Google dominance.

The problem is that such a device doesn't really have a chance because it's not compatible with existing infrastructure such as WhatsApp, Instagram, your banking app, what-have-you. It could be the best device in the world, but there's always a catch-22 problem with software that's fundamentally closed and can't be implemented by a third party.
I once performed services for a wedding where there were 28 bridesmaids and groomsmen combined (a roughly even mix of each). Everything seemed very status driven and the wedding was at least a $500K affair.
I'm actually surprised people still look at celebrities as some type of moral authority.

For example, I like Adam Sandler, if Adam Sandler started selling his own Adam Sandler coin, I still wouldn't buy it.
Honestly, like with most skills, practice. Build lots of interfaces and complex interactions and you will get better at it over time.
It's true, and I alluded to this more in depth in a comment in this chain.

Growing up in the semi-rural South East, USA, where kids didn't get diagnosed with ADHD. (Fun fact -- I had 5 boys who were my childhood friends that grew up with. We all lived within 3 miles of each other, and all of us have ADHD -- something in the water maybe?)

I didn't know I had ADHD until I was in a dark dark place in my early 20s after 4 years of college (only took me 6 years lol).

I swear I have some kind of CPTSD from growing up with it. I developed all kinds of healthy and unhealthy coping mechanisms and a lot of anger and negative self-talk that I struggle with still to this day.

I mean, I was chewed up and spit out by the public education system, little league sports, other children's parents, my peers, and even my own parents from time to time. Constantly, day in and day out, being punished, ridiculed, and humiliated for something I could not control. I didn't want to be that way, and I still don't want to be that way, but I am what I am.

I would not consider myself to be anything but average intelligence, maybe even below average, but if it weren't for sheer luck and a determination to prove everyone wrong, then I do not think I would have survived.
That's not my take at all. I have a /60 from my ISP, and have 5 ports on my router, each getting it's own /64.

Hosts get a stateless IPv6 address, no running out of leases, no DHCP service that's painful to make redundant, no expired leases when the DHCP server is down, etc. I consider that a win.

Also with so many IPs, each client can grab a few, and rotate them, so facebook doesn't see the same IP as twitter, etc. Nor can you assume that connecting to facebook today will be from the same IP as facebook tomorrow.

So your MAC related IP never need to be shared with the internet, but can be used to accept incoming connections, for those that know the IP, or know the DNS to look up the IP. For those that really want DHCP you can have that as well with DHCPv6.

IPv6 also removes the need for a NAT, all my /60 of IP addresses are visible to the internet, nothing gross like the various ugly hacks for connection forwarding, tunneling, and various weird unreliable technologies trying to get past consumer NATs.

IPv6 seems so much saner than IPv4. You can autoconfigure IPs and setup a firewall for any restrictions you want to make. I can share files gasp without dropbox, share photos without a photo hosting site, remotely open/close/check my garage door without depending on some few $ a month cloud service, remotely view my home security cams, etc.

Generally I think of the normal IPv4 provided single IP+NAT as a crippled consumer only connection that forces the use of someone else's service/cloud for even the most simple of things.
To each their own, but I'd rather altogether avoid a place where shootings are a common thing: https://www.cbsnews.com/baltimore/news/howard-county-teen-ar...
Many orgs buy AWS for the unified billing and control plane. That part is fused shut and precisely addressed by the text (not quoted above). I can't as a third party build a service that competes with AWS and give it the usability that is possible buying direct from AWS
so you're saying that a 3.5mm port cannot be waterproof, yet the stupid Apple proprietary power/data port can?
I still think that betteer ABI/API stability & control _is_ the ideally better solution, but even if I'm a fan of plain old C / sonames dependency management, I'll readily admit that very few people actually do any type of API promises these days, much less API.
It absolutely was sold as “you’ll be immune”. Maybe not in scientific papers, but certainly on the news.
> The problem isn't that audits are inherently worthless, it's that most of these tools are very low-quality implementations of the concept.

I think the problem is that the current audits are inherently worthless. I've never seen another industry that would accept a 95% false positive rate from a tool. But that's on the low end from my experiences (I've done 4 major codebase audits, and worked in the security industry for 5 years)

Tools that routinely spit out 1000 plus vulnerabilities, and 6 months later you've checked off all of them without a single valid vulnerability in the list (but 3 you found yourself during that time that were missed entirely by the shitty regex that is really the entire tool in question).
“I oppose this legislation that will bring massive good because I can imagine a few edge cases that have almost certainly been addressed but weren’t explicitly stated in the summary I glanced at.”

This type of comment is everywhere on the Internet and completely predictable.
The contention, from the User standpoint, however, is the network stack, potential to phone home, and the unrestricted access to the global machine state, combined with the fact, it is not documented or disclosed.

It's one thing to have that and be up front and open on it. Get secretive, and you're creating a massive source of unknown unknowns for everyone involved.

And like it or not, if you won't/can't be transparent about it, either

A) It'd take too long to document, which suggests there may be room for simplification
B) you're doing something that if it saw the light of day, would cause outrage, likely because you shouldn't be doing it
C) You're holding back the state-of-the-art for the sake of securing a revenue stream.

None of these inspires a excess of confidence/trust.
White's threatening to win a piece. There's a pretty nasty discovery in the position. Once you find the first move the rest should follow pretty quickly.