skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Imagine that we decarbonize most of our economy and mostly stop accelerating climate change, with a combination of renewables and nuclear. But somewhere in the world, a nuclear reactor will melts down every 5 years. Sometimes it's like TMI and sometimes it's like Chernobyl.

Probably it would be better to de-carbonize the economy. But the global economy is literally a tragedy of the commons. There's really no hope of massive collective action, even has humanity faces greater calamity. My point is that building a bunch of nuclear power will make it more likely that a Chernobyl happens every 5 years, but it won't have a large impact on climate change.
Love this minimalist approach!
There should be an option to appeal after this step. Did you ever do that?
What's enforcement for bike theft look like in your mind?
? This sounds like fiction, have any actual numbers?

Even nuke prices outside of the US and Europe are barely more expensive these days than the cost of wind and a gas plant, making them actually less expensive when the gas plant fuel costs are factored in over its lifespan.

Spend some time with: https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffsb&q=nuclear+construction+prices...

For starters lets look at:
https://www.vox.com/2016/2/29/11132930/nuclear-power-costs-u...

which has such wonderful nuggets as:
"A breakthrough came in 1963 with GE's contract to build a low-cost light-water reactor at Oyster Creek, New Jersey. By the late 1960s, overnight construction costs for new reactors had dropped to $600 to $900/kW in today's dollars — cheaper than modern gas plants. Atomic energy was on a roll."

The cost is basically bullcrap, even now, if you look at the prices for American and French companies to build plants in China sure its more than a wind farm, but actually about the same per KW when you factor in the gas plant needed to backup that wind farm, nevermind solar...

https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-pr...

And those are basically one off, if you think the Chinese are going to be paying those premiums for their own home grown designs I think your probably missing the past 25 years or so of Chinese economic theory, which is summarized as learn how to build it utilizing foreign companies, frequently at great cost, build a few experimental copies/etc and then start stamping out home grown designs for a fraction of the cost. That is after all why your solar panels are so inexpensive. At least where I'm at though, the price of solar hasn't really declined much over the past 15 years or so, because the labor costs now account for probably 2/3th+ of the installed system costs. Going from a $1.50 a W panels to $.60 panels while the install cost climbs at a faster rate hasn't been a winning combination.
How Hate5six Captures The Hardcore Universe
As I recall, pipx does this; it installs a separate env, but then provides entrypoints (commands) to the global environment.

For example, it would install ansible and the ansible dependencies to a separate environment somewhere, but still put commands for `ansible`, `ansible-playbook`, etc. into /usr/local/bin for example. When you run the ansible command, it loads ansible from the separate environment.

I haven't actually tried this myself since our environments are pretty uniform, but it could be worth looking into. It would be nice if pip itself provided this as an option (or if it became the default), but that could also become extremely complicated in terms of upgrades. I already hate having to download and build scipy, but it would be incredibly irritating to have to do it once for every tool I have that uses it. I'm sure some kind of cache could be made to work, but it's not trivial.
> The fact that the suggested solution in Python is to give every Python script a full copy of an entire specific Python runtime (via venv) is a mild annoyance as a design pattern...to me.

That bothers me too, a bit. But sidethread to you people are comparing python unfavorably to ruby, which as far as I know uses exactly the same strategy (except that it's called "rvm" instead of "virtualenv"). Node.js appears to do the same thing.

To my eyes, the solution to this would be static linking, but I don't know how much sense that makes in the python / ruby / js context. Other than that, what's the alternative? There's certainly a lot of convergence on this solution.
> Also, what about windmills on the ship itself?

You mean, like sails?
So...why do SSRI users self-report efficacy?
Not sure 50 Republicans is "large" but I guess it's enormous when compared to recent norms.
Beej's Guide to Network Programming Using Internet Sockets

https://beej.us/guide/bgnet/
This is all a bit besides my point, which is that youtube's system is not just the system required by law, but much friendlier to the accuser.

That said, there are also civil penalties for false takedown notices under 512(f), which I believe have been successfully litigated. Still, the effort vs reward in litigating them is almost never worth it.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/512
Based on some of these videos it looks like they also have some radio direction finding or proximity tracker in addition to the GPS. GPS gets them into a circular area then they have to run around to pinpoint it.
Well, it says remove yourself from the environment.

I did hit a point when dating where I asked my gf to leave me alone for a bit. She didn't take it well, but sometimes you have to do it. Often one person needs it more than the other.

In marriage, both of you need a little me time. Every now and then, my wife goes to the movies alone, while I play with the kids at the playground. This is especially likely when someone takes the share of work, especially homemakers. If you're doing the same work 7 days/week, you're bound to get burnt out.
You need to sue them. It's not about YouTube, the way it's working is how the law is written.
Yes, this was my recollection as well. I'm thinking of the dispute with the Beatles[0], but there may be another.

[0]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Corps_v_Apple_Computer
For a Consultant, What Is a Point of View?
I don’t find the schema argument compelling at all. Postgres JSON columns are highly performant and queryable.
CBT is the neatest thing since sliced bread. It's easy to learn, easy to apply in daily life and works to create a more balanced mood almost effortlessly. It's stops making sense to get so emotional about things. It's also free from material on YouTube and elsewhere. I think it a very handy tool for dealing with the constant stimulation of the modern world
I didn't get Python until it was pointed out to me that Python is procedural. The objects in Python is more like how I wrote "object-oriented programming" in Pascal with records and procedures. All the intuitions one would expect in Ruby with respect to encapsulation is inverted in Python.

I have noticed that this extends to Ruby's approach to bundler, and Python's approach to virtualenv/et al.

Knowing this made me less irritated at Python.
It's how Marvel funded their early films - a 200m revolving line of credit.
As a life-long speed/skim reader, 100+

It's been increasingly pointed out to me that my fiction reading habits, which permit enjoyful re-re-re-reading (the constant surprise of things missed each prior reading) are anti-patterns for legal or technical writing: in these cases reading deep, slow, is far better.

There's nothing wrong with re-reading per se. It's about context.
Several different manufacturers make chromebooks.
For small apps, which are most apps, a distributed, managed, partitioned postgresql cluster is sufficient.

Heck, even a single one on a good machine is sufficient.

It has a colorful mix of SQL and NoSQL constructs, interacted on SQL queries.
Neither 20ppm nor 0.17ppm are mineable reserves. The fundamental problem is that we run out of viable lithium ore, a realistic prospect if we’re planning to power ships with them.
Of course, there are many other people in exactly the same situation who end up with nothing at all because they guessed on the wrong startup to work for.
> OP probably takes in 3-5M a year.

I would be surprised if they're bringing in more than $250k pre-tax.
Google Begins Publicly Testing Its AR Glasses
Post it on rumble. Not so you get money. Simply so one more good peice of content goes to the competition.
Hmm.. I think I just realized that I had fallen for the "lights out" hoax for the longest time. I heard about it first in an email around 1998. I believed it to be true until I read this Faxlore wikipedia link today. Wow!

To clarify, just a month after I heard about this, I had a confirming event. I was in Detroit at that time and my wife and I were staying in a motel. It was just after sundown. We pulled out of the motel parking lot into the road. It was less than a minute later that I realized I did not have my car headlights turned on and I switched them on. Seconds later, a cop who was following us stopped us and questioned us if we just pulled out of a parking lot. He didn't give me a ticket, just an enquiry and let us off. That incident worked as a confirming event for me.

Bunch, Michael: "Technology Aided Spread of Terrifying Hoax", San Diego Union-Tribune, Oct. 4, 1993 – "Lights Out" gang initiation legend spreads by fax and copier.
Equivalency has many forms. I also don't think they are actually equivalent, and I don't think vesting corporate entities with "personhood" was a good thing. But, I see a pattern, a linkage, between persistent denial of legal boundary, by individuals and by corporate entities. I believe the one informs the other.

I might add that I dislike IPR, and Patent law intensely.
It boggles my mind how anyone in 2022 can want to vote "no" on this bill.

I guess pandering to the lowest common denominator gets you votes.

My representative voted "no", and I guarantee my friends and family won't forget it.
And template error messages should become much better with concepts in c++20.
Correlation isn't causation. The serotonin effect may be a symptom of the depression. Treating symptoms is sufficient intervention for many.
Ask HN: What metric does your company use to measure deveveloper performance?
I read a thread on Blind that some companies use diff count, number of PRs, comments on PRs etc to measure developer performance. This got me curious to ask the question
All 157 no votes were Republican.

Although they always talk about "less government interference" and freedom and rights, they consistently vote to strip already established rights and freedoms away from people.
Sorry you must be thinking of classical AWS
Copyright strikes are such a blatant example of the legal system being bought and paid for by the wealthy, it's not even funny.

From personal experience I can't say the system works any better if you're a creator whose content is getting ripped from other sources and put onto YouTube either. I've had people ripping numerous videos and it apparently takes longer to complete YouTube's takedown form than it takes for the ripper to upload the exact same video to their channel again. I thought there was supposed to be some provision in the safe harbor laws that YouTube hides behind to deal with repeat offenders but apparently it doesn't carry any practical weight if there is.

I'd be the first to agree that copyright protection has been expanded too far and the mechanisms for enforcing it are often used unfairly and in a heavy-handed way. Reform is well overdue. I'd have slightly more understanding if those methods did at least work in cases of flagrant infringement that are exactly what copyright law was always supposed to prohibit but it seems they don't. Not for the little creator at least.
Yeah, specialized computing leading to FPGAs and ASICs is quite an interesting path, I've always wanted to compile my code as a processor instruction/co-processor/fpga thingmajingle to cut down on all the bloat at once, mister is so much on my to-buy list.

Imagine writing haskel and having it become literal hardware, like https://github.com/clash-lang/clash-compiler
could you expand a bit more on this? I'm a bit confused. First you're saying the conscious brain is killing your body and burnout is the body's attempt at trying to save itself. Then you seem to imply that it's an external toxin being consumed and you have to consciously identify it and stop consuming it?
Serious question: I love FF because of many reasons, but "additional voice at the web standard group" is quite far down the list for me. The top reasons I'm using FF right now are the features, namely high customizability on everything, TreeStyleTab, Picture in Picture mode with subtitle support, container tabs, all the privacy stuffs, and so on. How hard is it to have all these features with another engine like Webkit or Blink? Would there be a chance of FF keeping these features but switch out the engine it uses so that it takes less engineering effort to maintain?
Interesting. Does this mean that anyone can claim any content from any YouTube content creator?

I'm curious why this isn't being done more frequently, but if it is, what recourse do YouTube content creators have to still make it profitable for themselves.
In some cases the landowner doesn't pay anything for the water due to water rights, hence the egregious use.
This is exactly my point. The issue I was pointing out is that the comments only spoke to a single side of this, with none of the nuance you provided.
The Republican party trails the Democratic party by 5 to 10 years in their stance towards social issues. In 2008 Obama campaigned for president against gay marriage. 14 years later such a stance would be political suicide for a Democrat. Now Republicans support gay marriage. At least enough for this to pass. So really things are just playing out the way they always have for quite a long time.
Thanks. It has the original image, it may even be the source of it. It made it clear that yes, these cavernous spaces are designed to be the container: they are making these voids to be "full" of oil. Which invites all the gas purging and safety concerns I raised. I am totally sure the SG petro industry knows these risks and deals with them btw.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Placebo
Agreed. The key to soft deletes is to actually move the record out of the original table to ensure they don’t accidentally end up in a query join.

But there’s always something that needs to be undeleted. You can either have an easy way to do it or restore an entire DB backup and cross query the missing records. Soft deletes are a lot easier.
The YouTube copyright claim process isn't DMCA.
It's called rumble.
You can bring your own, but technically you can only drink it in a private room. That said, I've seen people sipping in coach or in the observation car on every trip I've taken. Be discreet and don't overdo it. I've also seen a guy left in a tiny desert town in the middle of the night for being a belligerent drunk.
>a 300 MW charging station

Assume 90% efficiency - that means dropping 30 Megawatts of heat into the water in port. That could be a problem.

Also - 300 Megawatt single point loads? What's that going to do to grid stability?
Do the math - container ships carry literally million of gallons of fuel to propel themselves through the ocean with enough spare to deal with inclement conditions, storms etc. A truck carries a rolling load, meaning once they are up and rolling the engine doesn't have to work as hard on a flat surface, boat propellors are continuous load.

What battery technology exists today that could even begin to store and deliver the amount of energy needed reliably, how long would they take to charge up? I suspect the size of the batteries would look like a fully loaded container ship.

This isn't 'anti scientific' it's a common sense practical rebuttal of a pseudo scientific/academic fantasy world
Strictly speaking, advocating for small governments (more easily controlled, gerrymandered, etc) to decide whether or not certain humans have basic fucking rights is definitely a talking point with a rich history in the United States. (I’m aware not just republicans made such talking points in the past… only that that specific football has been in play a long while in many forms.)
I saw a project a while back where someone hacked up a fake AirTag (or perhaps flashed hacked firmware onto a real one?) that switched it's private key out in a deterministic pseudo-random way, so the stalker tracking sees it as a different AirTag every 6 or so hours and never triggers the alerts, but the owner still could query the FindMy service to see the locations for all the pseudo-random keys...
No. If the author were truly trying to present this as fact there’s be far more remarks against anticipated disputes “pythonistas will say… blah blah blah… but here’s why they’re wrong” or more extreme statements, “it’s an objective truth that… only fools would deny…”

The author doesn’t do any of this, in fact the author is barely even arguing a point. It’s pretty clearly an opinion piece. Human beings have been writing like this and differentiating between fact and opinion for centuries. Demanding that all writing be watered down to hedge-laden statements and statistics would land us in a very boring world indeed. People can read, judge, and think for themselves. We don’t all approach literature like computers reading instructions.
The Creative vs. the Marketing Team: Yin and Yang, Oil and Water
imagine working in a field where nothing is probably true
Here's a toy implementation:

https://www.db-fiddle.com/f/n3ux4s7mcZ2554738T14QR/2
It’s a bit more complicated than that:

glider wing area ~10m2, F16 ~30m2, F22 ~80m2
> Being proud of canceling holidays because your manager says so is slavery with extra steps.

Stripe pays a little more than slave wages...
My guess, without digging into the study itself since I'm on mobile, is that there is no singular cause for depression. Rather, depression is simply a symptom of a wide range of causes, with one possible cause being low serotonin (or a reduced sensitivity to it). Or even, low serotonin is a symptom of the depression.

Not all patients with depression find relief from SSRIs, or medications in general, but some certainly do.
If you have obligations that prevent you from doing whatever the fuck you want with your time, you're not rich. Rich equals does not have to work.
The big reason for the complexity is contractual arrangements/agreements with large copyright holders.

Else, we could skip straight to 3A (which is still them not being involved, and it is their legal obligation to maintain safe harbor under DMCA).
Ideally you have some heat sink/oscillation analogy instead of just replacing damaged parts every time. A lot of families were strained during lockdown as they were all forced to sit together 24/7.
Lithium isn’t easy to mine, and basically impossible to extract in meaningful quantities from seawater. The word itself derives from lithos, meaning rock, because it is usually found in certain rocks. This hints at the challenges it takes to mine it.

Lithium is a lot like the rare earth element, which means while it is technically not a rare substance, good ores of it however are rare.
So just like in Fran story you decided to lie down and take it? 8 digit views equals ~$30-60K payout, plenty to pay for a lawyer and keep fighting.
> I'm in the anti-nuclear camp. Mainly because I think the inertia around current consumption patterns is too strong to overcome, so adding a lot of nuclear to the mix would make things a lot more dangerous without making things much better.

Adding lots of nuclear would vastly reduce greenhouse gas emissions, which are the single biggest threat to humanity and life on earth.

> This is how I think about the danger of nuclear power. Imagine a really safe nuclear power plant. How often will it fail? Let's say, once every 100,000 years. Assuming this probability is uniformly distributed over the 100,000 year time period, it has a 1/100,000 chance of failing in any given year. A failure seems pretty unlikely. But, there are something like 450 operating nuclear power plants in the world. The chance of a single power plant failing in a year is then 1 - (99,999/100,000)^450 which is around 0.5%. That's starting to look a lot more likely now. After 30 years, there is a 78% chance of a nuclear power plant failing somewhere on Earth.

> Now what's even more interesting is if you look back on historic nuclear power accidents at INES level 6 or higher. 1957 - Kyshtym disaster, 1986 - Chernobyl, 2011 - Fukushima. And of course there have been other close calls (e.g. Three Mile Island). The cadence of these accidents seems to match the data from the thought experiment above.

Yes nuclear power plants fail at some rate. Contrary to the pro-fossil-fuel / green propaganda, even quite serious failures are just not very serious in the scheme of things. A single coal mine collapse will easily kill many more people than all the direct deaths attributed to nuclear accidents combined. As for indirect, coal mines (EDIT: that should be coal power stations) will pump out chemicals and radiation that kill vast numbers of people _when they are operating normally without any failure_. Other fossil fuel plants less bad than coal, but still very damaging.

EDIT: references - https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/c-change/news/fossil-fuel-air-p..., https://cen.acs.org/articles/91/web/2013/04/Nuclear-Power-Pr...
If we don't understand the mechanism of action it can still cause an effect. After all SSRIs certainly cause plenty of other side effects.
Your issue is with the readability of the diff? That is so trivial. You're trying to find anything to complain about at this point. How about just look at the code? You should be doing that anyway.
This is completely unsurprising and indicative of how limited our understanding of the brain is.

It reminds me of Pfizer's work on gabapentin. A professor from Northwestern was working on GABA antagonists (by modifying GABA itself) and eventually came up with the drug. It was hailed as a great example of "structure-based drug design".

The drug was approved by the FDA and efficacious for a number of issues like neuropathic pain. The submission documents from Pfizer had all this data on the binding efficiency of the drug to GABA receptors.

Except it didn't work through the GABA receptor at all.

After approval, more research was done and they said it worked through glutamate channels. Then more work was done and it seems most of its effect is through calcium channels.
You are responding to an entire article all about the math. That you did not read. And dismiss because you apparently know better without even bothering to know what they are proposing.

There is nothing more anti-scientific than that. You are not even making a basic effort to understand what you are criticizing.
It’s not really a efficient heat sink since it’s just a big slab with no fins to actually cool itself down. Now it’ll heat up the whole chassis and then stay hot. It also doesn’t look like the metal piece on top of the CPU is seriously connected to the chassis (like with direct contact and thermal paste)
It’s nuts. You can’t take the study seriously. Charging a few of these ships will easily overwhelm the local grid.
When they test drugs, they test them against a placebo.
It was crushed and not a clean cut so they couldn't reattach it.
Whoops, yeah, that was an example of anti science as a position (the pro-science person would hold the opposite beliefs across the board).
Class action lawsuit anyone?

It seems like this would be a perfect target for class action lawyers who go after very large targets (ie Google) for causing distress en-mass.
I think Clarence specifically omitted inter-racial marriage from his list of future targets for obvious reasons: his wife Ginni is white.

"It's okay for me, but not for thee"