skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The fears are pretty plainly invented for the purpose of whipping up political fury. It's simple posturing for the purpose of whipping up enthusiasm for upcoming midterms.

Thomas, writing in the Dobbs decision, explicitly took Griswold, Eisenstadt, Lawrence, and Obergefell off the table.

> Unable to show concrete reliance on Roe and Casey themselves, the Solicitor General suggests that overruling those decisions would “threaten the Court’s precedents holding that the Due Process Clause protects other rights.” Brief for United States 26 (citing Obergefell, 576 U. S. 644; Lawrence, 539 U. S. 558; Griswold, 381 U. S. 479). That is not correct for reasons we have already discussed. As even the Casey plurality recognized, “[a]bortion is a unique act” because it terminates “life or potential life.” 505 U. S., at 852; see also Roe, 410 U. S., at 159 (abortion is “inherently different from marital intimacy,” “marriage,” or “procreation”). And to ensure that our decision is not misunderstood or mischaracterized, we emphasize that our decision concerns the constitutional right to abortion and no other right. Nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.

> Finally, the dissent suggests that our decision calls into question Griswold, Eisenstadt, Lawrence, and Obergefell. Post, at 4–5, 26–27, n. 8. But we have stated unequivocally that “[n]othing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.” Supra, at 66. We have also explained why that is so: rights regarding contraception and same-sex relationships are inherently different from the right to abortion because the latter (as we have stressed) uniquely involves what Roe and Casey termed “potential life.” Roe, 410 U. S., at 150 (emphasis deleted); Casey, 505 U. S., at 852. Therefore, a right to abortion cannot be justified by a purported analogy to the rights recognized in those other cases or by “appeals to a broader right to autonomy.” Supra, at 32. It is hard to see how we could be clearer. Moreover, even putting aside that these cases are distinguishable, there is a further point that the dissent ignores: Each precedent is subject to its own stare decisis analysis, and the factors that our doctrine instructs us to consider like reliance and workability are different for these cases than for our abortion jurisprudence.
I'm unfamiliar with it, but that would still be initiated from the host itself, not an attacker on another machine.
> VanMoof currently lets you unlock your phone with your bike

Unlock your bike with your phone?
I wish we had whistleblower rewards programs in Canada
Just a lot of small things stand out:

- function and variable types are harder to visually parse for me. The keyword to declare a variable and the type put the varible name in the middle for instance.

- the "fn" keyword is terrible, just to save on characters. Honestly, any keyword should have vowels and is pronounceable. Python has "def", I would have been fine with "func" as well

- type annotation for templatization make is hard to read where the real arguments begin (for me). I puts info on the type in another place than the variable itself.

- "Mutable" feels like it should be all lowercase, to stand out.

In general, I know there are areas to improve on C++ syntax, especially on modules, but some choices seem different just for the sake of difference.
I was getting ready to disagree with you - but then I tried to think of any time I've actually pushed code to production with the "DELETE" keyword in it. The problems that I've had to solve in my career very rarely call for deleting something.

"Soft deletion" and "audit trail" are technical terms we developers come up for solutions the business wants but maybe hasn't asked for yet. It's not really a soft deletion it's a "deactivate" or "hide". Likewise, it's not an audit trail it's a "history" or "undo". Most of the time your stakeholders and users actually want these features, but don't ask because they perceive this as more expensive to build then just a "delete" button.
Synchromesh: Reliable Code Generation from Pre-Trained Language Models
> we can't judge the level of crime based on the number we know coming out at stage 5.

We'll never know the exact details, but we can still piece together a statistical model of the world from the evidence we do have:

We can compare it to similar systems, for example. Murderers have to go through similar steps, so one might reasonably conclude that high-value financial crimes are less common than murder. If there are other countries with similar programs, we could also compare our number to theirs.
Nutty macroeconomic theories will ruin your country's economy
Interesting, this page has been around for a while and did not used to belong to codecrafters.io. I guess they bought the original repo so it would redirect here? Or maybe the original author started codecrafters.io? Indication of change here: https://github.com/codecrafters-io/build-your-own-x/commit/6... when the (non)copyright changed a week ago.

Here's what I remember seeing (someone's archive of it anyway): https://github.com/Sevistuo/https-github.com-danistefanovic-....
As is the case with most things, there is some truth and lots of examples to both sides.

One example regarding the little fishes is the San Joaquin River, which was dammed in the 1940s for human use to the point that it ran dry before meeting the ocean. After 20 years of environmental lawsuit, it was determined in the 2000s that the river must be restored for salmon run that hasn't existed in 70 years.

Similarly, % of water from the Sacramento river delta exported have significantly decreased since the 90s over concern for the delta smelt.
Great! They should have done the same with abortion when they had a majority in all branches.
Python's package management is to package managers as C++ is to programming languages: everyone who uses it understands about 10% of it, and no two people understand the same 10%.
I don't think we're talking about the same thing.

I understood that the conversation was about attesting that, for instance, googleusercontent.com was owned by the same entity as google.com so could share cookies.

A) I don't see any way that the list included in browsers of public suffixes makes it possible to decide that google.com really owns googleusercontent.com. If it did, we would already be there and woudln't be discussing this.

B) Who do you think makes the public suffix list in the first place, where do you think it comes from exactly?
If an attacker already has sunk costs in successfully compromising both in a different market, then both isn't a new cost, it's two new markets. As for "why both", see recent attempts to audit electronic voting systems.
You might also like William Vollmann's "Imperial".
New documents reveal scale of US Government’s cell phone location data tracking - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32143256 - July 2022 (272 comments)
Yeah, for sure, if deletion is going to be the exception rather than the rule.... keeping deleted stuff in the main tables is not ideal.

Of course, you can have your cake and eat it too. You can e.g. keep your deleted crap in the main table (which makes certain things easier) and then hard-delete or archive it to another table after N days.
The GDPR gives limits on answering, I'm not sure it gives a limit on actually deleting the data everywhere.

Various types of data have various retention times for various reasons, some being legal reasons.
I think it is snark. The implication is that if he just said “use css classes” in 2022 it wouldn’t be understood by “cool kids” so tailwind is mentioned to clarify what a css class is.
> but that is less of a cost than having to add "deleted=False" predicates in all of your queries.

It's like people have forgotten what views are.
i don't see the irony here, sorry

Typosaur can do things LanguageTool cannot, this is why it exists
> You assert that "it's not consuming generic REST APIs" but that's exactly what it is doing as far as I can tell, unless you define "generic" to mean "HTML".

It's not consuming a weather API or a storage API or a query API. It's consuming an API designed exactly for the singular application that is being designed. It's not distributed except in the sense that it is a client/server application but it's tightly coupled to a singular implementation. A completely different environment to what the entire paper is about.

You've responded to literally the least interesting part of my comment as even accepting hyperview as a hypermedia technology doesn't negate any of the criticism of "by the book" REST. I may be guilty of caring more about whether REST as described is practical and possible then appealing to the authority of Fielding's definitions.
Yep, but the total dependency area there is relatively small and focused. Compare with something like a general spreadsheet, with any number of cells that need updating based on formulas entered in them. That's just not an application that is going to be amenable to a hypermedia approach.
Python as a language is a joy to use (for small projects), however pip has soured my experience of Python so drastically that I actively avoid taking up Python projects out of knowledge - not fear, knowledge - that the setup/install process is going to be a humongous pain. In most cases I can get started more easily with Node.js/TypeScript.

in b4 "use some other package manager / pipenv / virtualenv etc" - no. How about pip actually installs things as expected rather than making me jump through 1000 hoops. /rant
> Because nobody was there to make laws against having fun. And people want to have fun so more people went there.

What a libertarian and HN explanation. Quelle surprende.
They used to have at least pretend they weren't doing it, because there was popular demand to avoid it. I miss those days. When we believed this was possible, and there was demand for it, hope for it, and it was a real topic for international treaties, and governments had to figure out how to do it anyway. I'm not talking about 2007, but earlier. The evidence of that period is in the OP, that's the era he's talking about. Now nobody hopes for anything but forever war everywhere.
I think tox was designed to solve that problem.

https://pypi.org/project/tox/
I don't think this scheme provides the "monotonic reads" property discussed in the blog post. Specifically, it would be possible for a reader to observe a new value from r2 (who received a timely heartbeat), then to later observe an older value from r3 (who received a delayed heartbeat). This would be a violation of linearizability, which mandates that operations appear to take place atomically, regardless of which replica is consulted behind the scenes. This is important because linearizability is compositional, so users of CockroachDB and internal systems within CockroachDB can both use global tables as a building block without needing to design around subtle race conditions.

However, for the sake of discussion, this is an interesting point on the design spectrum! A scheme that provides read-your-writes but not monotonic reads is essentially what you would get if you took global tables as described in this blog post, but then never had read-only transactions commit-wait. It's a trade-off we considered early in the design of this work and one that we may consider exposing in the future for select use cases. Here's the relevant section of the original design proposal, if you're interested: https://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach/blob/master/docs/RF....
I disagree. Any system that doesn't transition an entity to "deleting" is almost certainly going to be a pain point for me when I go to delete something.

This can be seen as related to soft deletes. But I consider it more marking intent in the system. Lets you make "delete" a simple field update that will be carried out by the backend.
Why "Carbon?" I just want to known if I a missing something subtle... or if it is just C, the symbol for carbon.

Developers need better and unique names for their products. I realize no one will care because no one is using it anymore, but Carbon was already taken by Apple for their Objective C API.[1] That both are pretty much in the same space with the same name is sure not to cause any confusion.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_(API)
Even if the political issue is literally life or death, chances are the actual person you're talking to has very little to do with the actual political outcomes. It still doesn't make sense to ostracize some for simply have different beliefs. For example, plenty of Muslims and Jews get along just fine in Jerusalem, even when they may have sympathies towards Hamas or Zionists respectively. It's these relationships that prevent future misunderstandings that lead to more suffering.
In the beginning of the 90s I'd say there was a minitel in maybe 30% of homes in France (maybe a computer in <5%).

That was the preferred to look up a phone number / address, and checking exam results.
Reminds me of Ender's game. Could you do this with enough redundancy to make it worthwhile? And also have a computer doing the easy stuff, with humans at the ready to help at intersections and such.
Sorry, i mean it's not broken. The only problem with the css is that you cannot see the publish date of a video, but everything else is fine
Once you hit a certain scale it is probably inevitable that users will want to assign, receive, and manage actions (or events, or triggers) inside the product. "Workflow" or "work management" orchestrates all of the backend activity that ensures actions can be recorded, zip around to assignees, have statuses updated, comments entered, and so on.

There are a few tools out there like Elsa and Microsoft Rules Engine that stay in the backend, but are still fairly rudimentary in nature. So far as I know there's no "plotly" or similar A-tier framework that solves this problem for workflow. Most groups that have done it instantly monetize it with their own front end (Asana, Monday.com, etc.) which makes it difficult to justify the effort to integrate if you are going for a lighter weight application. Hope that helps clarify!
Of course it shouldn’t be an assassination :) it should be via democratic means similar to Trump in 2020…
Not blind, but I often watch youtube videos from 2x - 4x speed, only going below 2x to review complicated information (pausing a tutorial to read the text/code/image on the screen) or if the timing of information is part of the information (music, comedic timing, etc...)
> Unfortunately humanity as a whole isn't immediately threatened until smaller pockets have already lost habitat.

Your wish has already been granted. Check out Salt Lake City in the next two years as well.
What would you suggest using instead? How will it's availability compare? Will someone in 100 years have a chance of finding it?
Not an expert in python, but there is pyenv. I personally use asdf, which is great because it manages versions for multiple language runtimes.
To stay alive? Easily.

Also, the cost to transport gasoline is not $4.50 a gallon. The actual commodity is almost all of that.
You can already find water in retail stores transported thousands of miles for $1 a gallon at retail.
"It makes no sense to appeal to 4% of the population" seems like a bizarre claim, especially since that 4% is likely to be programmers in the top 25% of income.

I'm also not sure what error you're expecting? If browser bugs are a serious risk like this, you should surely be able to cite a few example lawsuits from the last year or two?
Except that, in today's America, everything is basically a NIMBY problem...

Sorry, friend, but I just wanted to fix that for you.
DHS is the cabinet level department containing:

- FEMA

- CISA

- TSA

- Coast Guard

- Customs and Border Protection (CBP, the actual agency directly involved here, though it's not identified in the source article, it is 8n the earlier article on the same issue it references)

- Citizenship and Immigration Services

- Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)

- Secret Service

CBP—more specifically, the Border Patrol, which is within CBP—and ICE (and it's partial predecessor, INS) have been problems even prior to the reorg that brought them their current organizational names and position in DHS, have been problems generations longer than DHS has existed.

But that's more about the politics attached to their function than boxes on an org chart; destroying DHS and portioning out their function different places in the executive branch won't solve anything.
I'm firmly in the "home computer generation" and it's becoming more frustrating than ever. It's frustrating that everything is going/has gone mobile, because mobile sucks. It doesn't matter what form factor or how fast the phone is, it's just easier to get up and walk over to a computer and do it 100x faster and easier. (obviously if you aren't near a computer or use specific apps, this isn't always the case).

The problem with how accessible "computing" is these days, which really means tablet and mobile, is that now everything has to be mobile first, which makes everything crappier and less configurable. It gives less power to the power user and we're the only ones who can see that loss. The market is so big now that few billion extra people actually regularly "compute" that of course every company will just keep digging down the rabbit hole to crappier and crappier experiences tailored for mobile only folks and no one will notice but us.

I have a business that sells custom items with a live preview. It fits and works wonderfully on a computer. You can see the preview, the inputs, the helpboxes, dropdowns and everything. But now the entire world just surfs where the experience can't help but be gimped by the size of a phone and how it operates via touch and in embedded browsers half the time. It sucks because people struggle through a process that would be 100x easier & faster if they just opened it on a goddamn computer, but they'll spend 45 minutes fighting through it on a phone. Maybe they don't know any better, but I don't ever see a future where they will and that's sad and depressing. Technology is just getting worse. I can't even get an SD card slot in a phone any more and people don't care or understand why that's insane.
But if nature itself is not producing water year after year and we are in prolonged drought, even paying higher prices will not ensure safe clean drinking water anymore for everyone in the cities. Maybe the future will be to start buying water like gas for $6 a gallon and I dread that day.
> Probably the keys are on well-guarded offline HSMs

I wouldn't be so sure...

After hearing that American nuclear launch codes were all zeroes for decades, nothing surprises me.
Plus the guarantee that if your name is published, you’ll have a hell of a hard time getting another job in your industry (not that this should be true, but I suspect that it is anyway).
use pyenv (https://github.com/pyenv/pyenv) to manage multiple python versions (e.g. install 3.6, 3.7, etc) and then use virtual environments

or use containers and a docker-compose file to run your test suite across versions
The question makes me think someone is teaching new developers wrong in a complex-thing-first way.

Instead of HTML, CSS, JS in that order maybe they got chucked right into a NextJS / Tailwind twitter clone course as their intro to web dev.
What's Your 'X' Rating?
asdf is good, and supports more than Python

https://asdf-vm.com/
Disagree. The impression I've got when talking to friends in traditional engineering is that the scope of a software role is larger (More vertically integrated, more expectations) and we have better processes (E.g. code review, deployment pipeline, monitoring, etc).

Cannot speak for EE, but I'm friends with people who do ChemE, MechE, Civil and mechatronics.
Who knows? Let's say they wanted to do some shady shit, is writing an email(with the possibility of discovery) on that, is the only way to go about it?
Who are the large Mongo customers? It “seems” like it died 10-15 years ago, but clearly they’re still going.
220m subscribers, loses 1m so 0.5% attrition under sustained market penetration by others.

OK, so this isn't nothing, but I would think the story is actually "Netflix loses ONLY 1 million subscribers"

They definitely should be boiling-the-frog-slowly with the $ for sharing thing. They really should. even 50c per month per household would help them stabilise revenue and return some normalcy to what's going on.

Lets all be clear: sharing your Netflix account is probably a breach of contract. Is it "good" that we normalise contract breach? "it depends" is the strongest I've got right now. The same scofflaw view that normalises contract breach in Netflix is normalising contract breach to us, as consumers by Uber, by the food chain, by airlines.

As we give, we get. This is not good, in the law-space.
Nice work. You should check out electrical engineering and embedded tech. I hear that's a good field to get into around here.
I mean, barely holding on to free and fair elections might be more prudent
Well, most likely they're queries that have "deleted=False" in them. ;-)
It reminds me of the time when my Director asked me what the main strengths of my colleagues were. The Director was not, I write this euphemistically, a genius.

When asked about one of my peers, I said, "They are extraordinary at [this]"?
The Director followed up with, "So you wanna say they are not good at [that]"?

When bad intentions are assumed, there is always a firm grip on the climb to total idiocy. And that Director was in clear view of the summit.
how about Slough-on-Thames?
I have a feeling that a system with no corruption would be far less efficient and productive than one with some corruption
Chart: Tesla is still trouncing competitors on EV sales in the US
pyenv is my tool of choice here. It allows one to easily install multiple versions of Python from source and switch among them.

It has mostly avoided feature creep, which is a big plus among all the competing solutions.
The level of ground water is going down continuously and sea water is not a great source of drinking water yet. Yes I wish there was a great technology to desalinate sea water efficiently and cheaply.
Has anyone got battle stories from using HTMX it similar? I there a time you regretted it a little and wished you had chosen React? Or is it pretty rosy?
Grapefruit and Salt: The Science Behind This Unlikely Power Couple
For an early access game, it is more polished than many games post release. Even with the incredibly scant tutorial. You can get at least 10 hrs out of the game before you even get to needing to be concerned about districts. And there are YouTube tutorials explaining how to set all that up once you do get there.
I didn't need to parse any XML file, but rather a specific XML file. It was inside an ITAR restricted codebase, and lawyers are conservative about open source in that context. In terms of security, it wasn't internet facing, and was written to the same standard as safety critical embedded software.