skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I've been down in the hole too; I dig this metacognitive framework. Anecdotally, I've noticed one other interesting dimension that could fit nicely into your framing.

As I understand your comment, it proposes a feedback-loop model a bit like this, where the brain observes reality and makes decisions about it. Those decisions affect reality -- which in turn affects the brain's state, it's ability to make decisions, and the very decisions it makes:

|----------->-----------|
| |
reality brain
| |
|-----------<-----------|

I agree with your idea of the "exploration" mode. (Alas, if only I could switch my brain's modes as easily as I can in vim.) Having been down low myself (and still being there in some ways), the question then comes down to: how do you get the brain to actually get up and start exploring? How can you bring a common-sense project-management approach to your own life, brainstorming ideas and prioritizing new frontiers to explore, when the brain keeps wanting to wander into a black hole of regret and rumination?

One notion I'm toying with is to decouple the right side of the diagram further. In this sense, I think "psychological resilience" means essentially the brain's ability to maintain its own internal state independent of reality -- in more practical terms, the brain can remain confident of its own ability to operate in reality, even as reality throws curveballs and does all kinds of wacky stuff (like, say, a job that becomes unfulfilling while the world is going through global pandemics and a volatile stock market).

|----------->----------->-----------|
| | |
reality internal decision-making
| emotional state brain
| | |
|-----------<-----------<-----------|

I think the mindfulness crowd would call this "equanimity" or "serenity." The Stoics are in a similar metacognitive neighborhood; Seneca wrote about it [1] more eloquently than I can:

> External goods are of trivial importance and without much influence in either direction: prosperity does not elevate the sage and adversity does not depress him. For he has always made the effort to rely as much as possible on himself and to derive all delight from himself.

It's all still way easier said than done. I have no illusions that I'm even close to being a "sage," in Seneca's definition. But remembering that there are more pieces to the puzzle -- more variables to toy with, more factors to optimize, smaller steps I can take -- helps, sometimes, at least for me.

[1]: https://www.themarginalian.org/2017/05/02/seneca-consolation...
If my construction doesn't work for all arbitrary primes then it won't be guaranteed to work for "a largest prime", which means it doesn't provide an example of one way "infinite" is treated in modern mathematics.

(Remember, the original essay described a constructive requirement for "infinite" - “If you think there are infinitely many, write them all down.” I wanted to demonstrate how to think about infinity without that requirement.)

If someone in New Zealand sends me a letter and it's delivered to neighbor, it's still delivered to the wrong house - even if it gets to me eventually.
Show HN: A high-speed (60sec) options platform on crypto
You make a bet if the price goes up or down in the next minute.
If you're right, you win >60%. If you're wrong, you lose your position.
Could you use a different coolant instead? Presumably primary coolant is reused not dumped (water flowing around the actual nuclear fuel). So the question is, what do you cool that with. What about CO2?
how does it compare to oscar that's open source? https://www.sleepfiles.com/OSCAR/
i like oscar because all the data analytics happen on your computer locally, so nothing gets sent out and you know its private
I think their rephrase was the charitable version. Now at least if that person did not realize how they were coming across they do now.
Past environmental threats didn’t just disappear
Any toll expensive enough to effect usage are an affront to the entire point of publicly funded infrastructure. The janitor has just as much right to waste his time in gridlock as the tech bro does.
It does do CI/CD, for what it’s worth[1,2]

[1] https://builds.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/builds.sr.ht

[2] https://man.sr.ht/builds.sr.ht/
Yep, that's what I used it for! Intersections. Hard to make concurrent though. Ended up with concurrent map backed geohash.
It’s perfectly reasonable to call them a terrorist state if they’re actively encouraging war crimes against civilians.
"mobile first" is less painful.
God didn't tell anyone that. A few old people wrote some stuff down in a book and now a whole lot of people believe they should follow some but not all of the rules in that book. Do you follow all the rules in your holy book?
This is true, but it fails to take into account back catalog the legacy media companies such as Paramount, Disney, NBC Comcast, and to some extent even HBO have to fall back on. They gain subscribers simply to watch the content they made 20+ years ago, and then on top of that, have in many cases just been running sequel and spinoff series on things they already know work. Sure, not every spinoff series works, but it's sort of like they're throwing darts at a known dartboard in a well lit room; Netflix is throwing darts in the general vicinity of where it believes a dartboard to be based on the sounds its heard from getting lucky in the past in a pitch black room. The consequence is that Netflix pays a lot more money finding its hits than its competitors do.

This isn't insurmountable, and Netflix has shown itself to be full of innovative means of handling this reality. But while the bulk of the last 10 years was just gathering subscribers to pay for other peoples' content (remember, until recently, The Office, Friends, Star Trek, and Disney movies were ALL on Netflix), the next 10 will require them to do more in the way of finding original content that works, and acquiring things from smaller/foreign studios (a la Squid Game). They've got practice, but they've lost their money printer.
I was with you until this sentence:

> I don’t believe free market exists in the USA and I think it’s economy and media is almost as heavily controlled as China.

It depends on sector and scale. At the small- and medium-size business level, yes there are free markets. As you get into large businesses and highly political structures (media, healthcare, education, etc.) you're right, we are nearly devoid of a free market.
The base model is $829 at Microcenter and $849 at Costco.
I can't predict the future, but I also will point out if it gets to the SC it won't be now, it will be the SC 10 years from now.

That being said I would hope this is an open and shut enoght case under the 1st Amendment and the Interstate Commerce clause to justify this. Which I would hope overrules personal agendas in the court.

I know a lot of people are upset with the overturn of Roe v Wade, but even the initial judges in that case said the constitutional ground that case was ruled on was shaky, which my understanding is the basic job of the SC is to rule on the constitutionality of laws. Now decades of an activist judiciary have distorted that concept as the legislative branch has chosen to abdicate their responsibility for their own gain, but the fact still stands, congress should be making the laws and the courts deciding if they are constitutional.
>The world today is wildly different from the world of the 1970s, and yet we've made no changes to the constitution.

No, it isn't. I'm pretty sure the Bill of Rights is still a pretty good set of basic rights. Would you be willing to roll the dice on throwing a random out to get a new one? That is what can easily happen when you make changing it easy enough to be done quickly.

Also, why would you want to change the root of all laws at any crazy rate? There is a reason Congress makes new laws, and states make new laws, every single year. You should not need to make drastic changes to the base legal framework just because someone invented an internet - you should be able to apply current legal frameworks, and if that is not enough, make small changes to address such changes. Even small legal changes at the Federal and local levels have significant cost to make needed changes throughout society. Now allow tinkerers to make constitutional changes willy nilly, and guess what the cost will be.

Or do you think it would be better for short-lived political trends to simply rewrite major sections of the Constitution every few years? That seems like an absolutely terrible way to plan a stable society.

>We used to update it every decade (at least). Something has changed, culturally,

Conversely, maybe the overall framework is pretty good, despite each subgroup not getting their way, so it doesn't need changed to add amendments for every tiny whim.
Pathways that were established when those chemical imbalances were active.
It's basically the Republican version of states that ban websites from hosting blueprints that tell how to make firearms.

It's more about scoring brownie points with your base and tying up your opponents in litigation for years... Even if they know the law is blatantly unconstitutional, there's no real downside to the legislatures (assuming their constituents support the unconstitutional law)
That doesn’t count people who don’t get in a car wreck, simply because they walked to buy groceries
Assange pointed out a long time ago that Google was functioning as a state actor. Perhaps the most public expression of this is “Google Jigsaw” and Jared Cohen’s prior role there (prior to joining Goldman Sach’s management committee as a partner).
The issue with most construction (and something complex like reactor maintenance) is that by its nature it is close-quarters, team-based work. A situation that you would want to minimize during an epidemic.
This also touches on a really important point -- all this takes place in a context. What is the context? One context -- sometimes there are exciting new features! Another context -- this issue is mostly about users who want to build your software from source (this isn't a problem for you, as such), but who don't want to download a new copy of the compiler to do that. Is this a large group of users, if you're not a library? I don't think so.
As Dilbert says: "Our boss can't judge the quality of our work, but he knows when it's late."
It is hardly absurd to point out that the rules used in a formal system are leading to absurd, bad, broken results.

And people do fetishize the 200 year old document. (At least, the parts they like.) You see it all the time, and saying otherwise is also form of fetish or worship.
How to collect more emails from your web traffic
I don’t even know how to process this.

It is clear that hard drug use does not happen in some isolated vacuum that doesn’t impact society around it. The despair, poverty, mental health, disease, violence and more that accompanies drug use is obvious and in many places out of control.

We can pretend there is some nobility to allowing this but people do not want to live in an open air drug den are moving away, voting against it, or shutting down their business (see: Starbucks recent closures)

The plight of drug addicts has become a convenient hammer with which to beat political opponents and gain retweets. “Look how empathetic I am, offering these victims a safe space to use. I am not throwing them in prison, for I am benevolent.”

The reality of this is now coming back to bite these people because as it turns out, the rest of society doesn’t want to live among the chaos that comes with hard drugs. We can continue to play pretend but civilians in these cities and open air drug neighborhoods aren’t interested anymore.
Should every movement be painted with the same brush as the worst people in the movement?
Right, but there is no transactional view with or without symlinks.
Paramount has done just fine for the last century. If you mean as a streaming platform, they only recently started even trying...and thanks to Star Trek, they've had a pretty decent start.
Ugh, ancap bullshit. Get out of your bubble.

> What's the point for investor to make money and then die of pollution or die in a fire.

Because then they have the money and you don't. That's all there is to it. Look at the world aroudn you and tell me how corporate greed isn't ruining it.

Actually don't tell me, your philosophy is bankrupt.
Indeed.Then they will go for other rights that are clearly in the Constitution.
What I mean is that it's pretty SOP to have a package that installs a new command to work by installing to /opt/my-package and then symlinking /usr/bin/my-cmd to /opt/my-package/my-cmd.

In the absence of symlinks, that link would be hard and dpkg et. al would have to do package management by deleting the /usr/bin/my-cmd link and re-creating it instead of letting it ride, trusting that it will point to the correct thing when the update completes because the target bin will have changed.
Oracle and Microsoft announce cloud tie-up launch
10-15% of car accidents are cause by mechanical failure. Some of those could certainly be blamed on large corporations cutting corners, so my question still stands.
> If you oppose abortion, you're the enemy.

I don't know about that; I think it is possible to oppose abortion, but not seek to do so via legal remedies. Like opposing drinking or smoking, or game microtransactions, or IoT devices.
I believe that Sir Terry was probably one of the greatest humans to walk the Earth. Not only was his work wonderful, but he was a really decent chap, as well.

Humble, well-educated, polite, honest, and, from everything I've heard, a joy to work with.
Therefore it must be false? I don't follow your logic.
Thanks for correcting me, seems I am mistaken. I was under the impression bills that have been passed were also referred to as bills.
didn't that only apply to open circuit cooling, rather than the closed circuit cooling that you would expect in most reactors ?

> The precise situation depends on the reactor. But in general terms, water is either returned directly, which is known as an open circuit, which can lead to general downstream river temperatures increasing several degrees, or the water is returned after cooling in air-cooling towers, known as a closed circuit, which typically leads to lower rises of downstream river temperatures, of a few tenths of a degree.
Does ibuprofen actually help with alcohol induced headaches? I've found the only things that can cure a hangover are time or more alcohol.
> My personal perspective is that God told us not to have sex before marriage...

Then why are so many characters in the Bible having sex outside marriage, or engaging in polygamy?
You can find lots of good exercises and drills on YouTube, but are you sure you are asking the right question? Are you 100% sure that ankle mobility is your problem?

In my case, I thought that ankle mobility is my problem but after working on my ankles for several months I didn't see the huge improvement I expected, and only then I realized that I have other mobility deficiencies such as hip flexion and rotation and my spine.

If you are not sure what your problem is, you should hire and expert for an assessment. A lot of the stuff you find online is great, but only if you exactly know what you're looking for.
> RFC 6979 is followed by compliant bitcoin wallets.

RFC 6979 uses HMAC, which would make the proofs pretty painful. You would probably want to swap this for some more efficient primitive. It wouldn't matter for compliance with the network.

> Statically proving an unknown and black box wallet requires a trusted computational (as would verifying any proof) device

Yes, but this trusted computing device does not need to be connected to any network. It can be an airgapped computer (or even several airgapped computers sourced from different vendors and retailers), each running different software. There is still "trust" here but the degree of trust can be arbitrarily reduced, provided that you're willing to spend money and effort.

Verifying proofs using only human computation is pretty challenging.

> A zkSNARK wouldn't improve random exfiltration, so both of these proofs are statistical unless inputs are tested exhaustivally to result in the pigeonhole principle for some bounded internal state.

I'm not sure what you're saying. As I said up above in the thread, the zkSNARK is typically randomized and thus could be itself used as a covert channel, even if the signature is now (verifiably) deterministic.

But that's ok: the model I'm working with assumes that the wallet owner is trustworthy, and that any local computers they use to verify the proof are properly (physically) airgapped. The zkSNARK would be verified by the user first -- using (multiple pieces) of airgapped, trusted hardware -- then discarded. Only the final signature would ever reach a computer connected to the Internet.

If your concern is that the wallet owner and the network are both malicious,* then you're dead. (ETA: removed a note about deterministic ZK proofs, all that would let you do is detect that you're dead after the fact and only if you sent them to the network: it doesn't matter in this extreme threat model.)

* By the time your attacker has stolen the Bitcoin wallet and can force it to make signatures, you're basically toast anyway. So this does not seem like a good threat model to waste time on.
It is if you're living in central Mississippi earning 600k/yr
This is performative stupidity. Those websites are legal on first amendment grounds, interstate commerce grounds, etc.
In Eve, doxxing individual players and using the information in propaganda campaigns is a big part of politicking. Mittens himself has certainly carried out his fair share of it. Twitch streamers might be where 'swatting' became popular, but eve corps have been using it to gain competitive advantages in the game for far longer. Getting someone to permanently quit the game is seen as a win condition.

Furthermore, nullsec entities in Eve are HUGELY egocentric, as people collect around leaders that bring them fun. This means that pretty much everyone who is doing well at the game is going to end up with a TMZ paparazzi situation. Mittens handles his pretty well, but anyone would get ground down by it eventually.

What I'm trying to say is that the community has a very high tolerance for BS and it will take more than posting some chat logs to get him to quit.

Anyways the reason this one was a bridge to far is because it seemed he was covering for a pedophile for like a decade. https://groomswarm.wtf/
Fun app, feels like gambling though. Try updating the post to indicate there is a "FUN MODE".
"Far-right" - Opinions that differ from leftist flavoured corporate agendas.
Aren't we comparing drivers vs drivers here?

If we aren't then you're just measuring the fraction of the population that drives (which is largely a reflection of wealth and demographics) which isn't really a measurement of the safeness of the roads and driving.
Has any study ever been able to induce depression reliably by reducing neurotransmitters?

As someone who once had depression that did not respond to any medication, which was completely resolved within 1-2 weeks of making a big but well planned life change, in retrospect I consider what was done to me borderline malpractice, considering some of the sude effects.
If you’ve studied the subject, the obvious reason is that Americans allow anyone to drive with minimal training. Regardless of past behavior. We even subsidize insurance rates for people who are so bad at driving they are uninsurable.

It’s a recipe for people getting killed.
I don't like your photographer vs government surveillance comparison. The scope is important. You as a single photographer cannot collect, analyse, and enact upon anywhere close to the amount the government (a single entity) can.
Hate Russia all you want but this energy crisis was entirely "free world" created and didn't start in February this year. Half of these idiots have resigned or are close to resignation due to an energy and food crisis that they have single-handedly created by the "free world" the last decade. They will just resign and live of their pensions while the rest of Europe is slipping into poverty[1].

Let's for a moment consider that Ukraine still makes transit money off of Russian gas. Has threatened Europe with gas cuts for the last two decades on multiple occasions. And even though Russia has been put through unprecedented sanctions, which actually sent prices soaring still supplies Europe with energy even though the west tried to effectively embargo them from the rest of the world.

They are in fact slowly lifting restrictions especially on food supplies[2]. But due to the uncertainty Von der Moron brought into the markets the prices are not due to go back down anytime soon.

[1] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-07-12/what-if-m...

[2] https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/eu-soften-sanctions-r...
“Oh it was decided with bad reasoning. We can fix it now.” — bureaucratic apologists

“We could have acknowledged it was bad reasoning in a legal context but not a human rights and that a fix would just create the same status quo and left it.” — sane people

Agreed; this was a political flex to remind the proles grandpa is still sitting in the corner rambling nonsense.
ok So maybe I read right past it, but who exactly is this targeting?

Is this targeting private citizens (or companies) that put up websites regardless of where the servers are located?

And/or is this targeting servers running these website within South Carolina.

Obviously both are bad, But I have to wonder if it is the second what this could mean for states like VA where AWS has a datacenter. If they were to enact similar laws.
In some regions it is harder to ensure that nobody steals radioactive material or blows the plant up than in others.
At least in this case, there's no "trick" to Wordle's virality. It was just a good game.

Have you played wordle? Did you share your results? In my case, I shared my results in Wordle when I had particularly rewarding solves: perhaps I puzzled over a particular combination of greens and yellows for 5 minutes or so before finally, triumphantly going AHA!, and typing in the answer instantly. (It's also amplified by it being very do-or-die sometimes - you very obviously only have 6 guesses, so if you don't get it right, you very well might lose.) This moment is exhilarating. It's a large piece of why people share Wordle results: they're still coasting on that feeling. These moments are hallmarks of good games (or, at least, sharable ones).

Another, less important reason people shared Wordle results is because they had a moment that they thought other people could relate to. A classic is having 4 letters right, but being stuck on the last letter for multiple guesses. I'd share that out, because my friends would get it (even though they wouldn't know my exact sequence of guesses).

With your game, I don't see any of these two cases. While it's fun to click the colors in fast flood, I don't have any exhilarating AHA! moment. Perhaps I could sit down for 5 minutes and puzzle out which sequence of colors I could press, but it feels neither do-or-die nor particularly rewarding to do so. It's more of a rational "oh, I see, if I click red-blue, I expand to this area faster", etc.

Second of all, there's nothing worth sharing, in the same way that it's sometimes rewarding to share the second case I wrote about Wordle - there's nothing other people could resonate with or be interested about. In fast flood, I just share my times and color counts. There's no story or interest there, not in the same way as the second case that I illustrated in Wordle.