skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm in the anti-nuclear camp. Mainly because I think the inertia around current consumption patterns is too strong to overcome, so adding a lot of nuclear to the mix would make things a lot more dangerous without making things much better.

This is how I think about the danger of nuclear power. Imagine a really safe nuclear power plant. How often will it fail? Let's say, once every 100,000 years. Assuming this probability is uniformly distributed over the 100,000 year time period, it has a 1/100,000 chance of failing in any given year. A failure seems pretty unlikely. But, there are something like 450 operating nuclear power plants in the world. The chance of a single power plant failing in a year is then 1 - (99,999/100,000)^450 which is around 0.5%. That's starting to look a lot more likely now. After 30 years, there is a 78% chance of a nuclear power plant failing somewhere on Earth.

Now what's even more interesting is if you look back on historic nuclear power accidents at INES level 6 or higher. 1957 - Kyshtym disaster, 1986 - Chernobyl, 2011 - Fukushima. And of course there have been other close calls (e.g. Three Mile Island). The cadence of these accidents seems to match the data from the thought experiment above.
Odysee and Peertube are both decentralized. Still relatively small, but are the biggest I know of
Its still useful for its original purpose - especially if your phone has the UWB stuff so you can play the "warmer, warmer" game. Just one less trick up its sleeve.
Having other people seizing the fruits of your work is upsetting. Syncing to other platforms is just more work and doesn't prevent the primary problem.

Calling her a whiner is unnecessary abuse.
Yes ! If it's about trust issue, then no way to recover. If it's not about trust, then just go travelling and sharing. Sharing is the key here.
> Yet claims like she owns the copyright if anybody since she owns an original reel is poorly articulated.

I interpreted this as having a laugh at how ridiculous it is for someone else to claim it's their footage, "I have the original right here!"
Imagine you're the copyright adjudicator for this claim at YouTube. You don't know if the claim is accurate. If it is and you leave the content up, your employer might be fined, and you get a write-up from your boss. If you take the content down, no fine, no write-up.

What would you do? Even if you try to side with creators, you might eventually be let go for making too many mistakes.

I understand that YouTube doesn't adjudicate claims themselves, but I think this may explain why they don't. Their adjudicators are heavily incentivized to take everything down. As a result, YouTube is hands off.

If this is an accurate framing of the situation, then incentives may not be properly aligned. Alternatively, YouTube (and others) simply have a monopoly position that needs to be out-competed.
It's insane to me that we do so much farming and development in a massive desert.
She said multiple times that she does not own the copyright. And she explains that’s because the video is a government product in the public domain.

What she says that if it was possible to have a copyright claim it should be her because she owns the reel. But not that she has copyright.
Disappointed. There's supposed to be a frazzled cartoon cat with a cup of black coffee and the words "I've got one nerve left and you just stepped on it."

(Come to think of it maybe I'm mixing memes.)
I didn't fully read the article, so maybe something I there talks about this or the ineffectiveness of this, however, what I find the most helpful is simple: tell the truth about how you are actually feeling.

I think so much of burnout and resentment/cynicism in general but especially in romantic situations is paying more attention to what the other person is feeling than how we are feeling. And that in many micro conflicts, we don't say how we're feeling, such as saying yes to someone when we want to say no, agreeing when we want to disagree, and more.

If you give more specifics on the situation, I'd love to give more suggestions on what has worked for me. If not, I understand and I'll stick with being more honest with myself and others about how I'm feeling has helped me a lot.
Went homeless. Done Guerrilla Grazing by choice ever since
Thank you.

What if I reframed the question to: What amount of lithium is currently extractable at an effective cost and how long does it last if we replace every vehicle on the planet with an EV overnight.

My searches seem to come to a number of ~14million tonnes which seems to be enough for ~1.4b Tesla's(at ~10kg of lithium each)

Is my math here wildly incorrect or maybe I am not understanding the potential for increased extraction at a reasonable cost?
Tell me you have Stockholm syndrome in as many words as you can…

Being proud of your work because of what you deliver with it is great. Being proud of canceling holidays because your manager says so is slavery with extra steps.
The DMCA does not require YouTube to be involved in any part of the judgement. By just being the messenger YT is granted legal immunity for their part in spreading the alleged infringing work. The complaintent is the judge _by design_!

The law is broken and needs to change.
Sure, this is true for every abstraction: some are more air-tight or leaky than others, but IME Poetry and go mod are fairly solid.

I haven’t had to use pip in a long time. Just like I haven’t had to use `go get` in a while.

I mean it’s not the most rock solid abstraction, but introducing sane package management in an OSS environment with a decade plus of history is very hard. Against that background, they are doing pretty well, IMO.
> And, 100k won't be enough to pay for one developer,

I mostly agree with you. But $100k/month will definitely pay for a developer.
I once faxed “oh god how did this get here i am not good with computer”[1] to Cheezburger, Inc.

[1] https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/oh-god-how-did-this-get-here-...
These kind of useful services were almost all provided by state owned entities (train tickets fit the bill). Other that train, you could also apply for national exams and get the results.

That's also why you ended up keeping a box in your home that only help in very specific occasions (except if you're taking the train two times a week), and most people would just go to the local post office to use the freely available Minitel when really needed.

I think the worst part was that many of these services were late to embrace internet partly because of the Minitel being a stopgap.
When I read the first example, my initial thought was that the author wasn’t considering the friend who WAS invited. There was only one extra ticket; if the friend had invited the author instead of the other friend, then THEY would have been in the same situation wondering why they weren’t invited. In other words, the author was not thinking of the invited friend as having the same feelings and desires as the author.

I think this happens a lot. People get upset that their feelings aren’t considered, but fail to realize that everyone else is in the same boat. Only one friend gets to go, why is your not being invited a bigger sleight than the alternative?

I think about this sort of thing a lot in various zero sum situations. For example, people get upset in video games where they don’t win a majority of their matches, but fail to realize that for every winner, there is a loser. If they won a majority of their matches, someone else has to lose a majority of theirs.
LiveView is such a great feature. I see Rails’ Hotwire trying todo the same thing, but it doesn’t seem as simple nor as practical.
Yes the free internet is dead and the implications are bad. You can win a battle but not the war so we have to deal with this shit.

I don't know why we keep re-hashing how the internet is dead to knowledgable people who 'are not supposed to be there' or are not being financially supported from someplace. It is just true.

These days it is VERY hard for a "consumer" wait sorry a "human product" to curate and share their own interests. Most popular internet platforms and forums are toxic to independents or people without money. While I'm sad that we're enabling content demolishing trolls but everyone around this topic is exhausted.

I'm probably going to delete this but damn can we not. This conversation isnt productive and people who can make this outrage productive are too expensive. Every time I see something like this I do a spit take and water my plants with Brawndo cause Brawndo's got electrolytes because thats what plants crave.

As an aside, I used to really love how cable tv attracted all of the advertising idiots while the internet wasn't pummeled to death with money and influencers. Cable and the internet had their own place. Now we see web destruction on a scale we cant replace or re-create a space for what the internet used to mean. There is no 'side stream' to filter out non consumer traffic.
The key is that, what kind of ACID properties you need in your business.

RDBMS puts a lot of effort to support a wide range of ACID properties. However which also make it very difficult to be used as cluster.

So if your bussiness data is too large to be hold by a single instance of database, you will need a database cluster. And maybe someday, you want to get better performance, then you change your schema to remove some data constraints. Like removing FK, use application logic instead of storage procedure, etc.

That's the reason why we need NoSql database.

If OLTP is not the key part of your business, and it is expected to store a large amount of data in future. Then it would be better to carefully design your data schema so you can use NoSql database instead of a traditional RDBMS.
If you look at some basic tests you can see it quickly heats up to about 105 degrees Celsius. And leading to degraded performance. And that is without even touching the GPU. I honestly was really excited about the M series. But it seems Apple is going down the exact some route they did with Intel. Massively underperforming in the thermal department. I pray this is an outlier. Or at the very least the pro series will not have this problem again.
At the same time, I mostly understand their levels. The higher levels are mostly intuitively as a developer, things that cost more money to provide in terms of infrastructure and access to paid APIs.

Also, I'm not sure what you're looking at, but looking in the app, Premium Ultra, which seems to only give you notifications for lightning and storm cells, as well as tidal data and the ability to hook up to your own weather data source, is $29.99/year.

I'm literally not seeing anything that costs $30/month on either of your links, or in the app.

They even do a decent job on your link of explaining why they charge money:

"The subscription is necessary because weather data is very expensive. Without charging extra for the subscription, in just one year it would cost CARROT more to supply weather data than a $4.99 upfront payment for the app. So CARROT's Maker either had to offer a subscription or not add these awesome features at all."

What's anti-consumer is how the app store obfuscates things in their UI. If you open the app itself and look at their options for purchasing a subscription, it gives you plenty of information that's clear and explains the levels. If you think this is your height of anti-consumer behavior, you're blessed in who you're shopping with.
Much of it falls under NHTSA in the United States, and largely can be self-certified (the same is not true in other parts of the world, which are more stringently regulating it). Search "ISO-26434" if you're curious for more info.

In this particular case, it seems like insecure charger/car authentication, which would be more understandable if there were third parties involved, but since it's Tesla chargers/cars both it's pretty bad.
Google - ok with being evil since 2015
The Hunted: Did American conservationists in Africa go too far? (2010)
Money. Sex services cost a lot, and French people hate costly services with a passion.
Couldn't soft deletion be happening behinds the scenes by the database engine?

Then have a statement like RESTORE * FROM ...
> The workflow Youtube has is pretty bizarre.

Is it? If it's more expensive for them to get it right, then maybe not getting involved in the adjudication makes sense.

It does seem like a great reason for creators to not publish on YouTube, however.

Once there is sufficient competition I would expect them to start adjudicating.

And before someone jumps in and blames the money train, capitalism, etc. Please let me know how you would run a business that is not profitable. The money to pay salaries has to come from somewhere.
All of your YouTube creators are begging you to go to Nebula... probably time to listen
I've seen in my experience that it's possible to rebuild trust, maybe not easy but possible. When I find that I start to distrust someone or we both distrust each other, sometimes I will try to open up even more about how I'm feeling, especially about sadness or shame or some more vulnerable things. And then I try to think about how they might be feeling on a much deeper level. While I can't control whether the other person starts to trust me more, these two steps often help me trust them a lot more.

But maybe this is what you meant by sharing. Also yes I love traveling for giving space to reflect.
> Agri-food systems' pervasive externalities imply a divergence between the market price of foods and their social cost.

We produce more food on less land than ever. Nutrient dense food is available year round at an affordable cost to almost everyone for the first time in history. Increasingly big ag is switching to drip irrigation and no till where that is appropriate. There's are also a growing body of research into how to manage large farms with lower fertilizer inputs. Things are changing and improving, just unevenly and incrementally.

The ability for the world to produce a huge surplus of calories and to trade them as commodities across borders IS resilience.
Kodak's early cameras functioned like disposable cameras. You took your pictures, then you sent or brought your camera to Kodak to be developed. They would refill the camera with new film and send it back to you.
I see the short date info (3 years ago) on thumbnails and the full date under the video page's title and right after the number of views.

Maybe something on YouTube got updated, and you were seeing some cached bit of code that didn't jibe right.
Probably because they would have to navigate the same lawsuits and agree to the same kind of automated take-down system to the satisfaction of the largest rights-holders (Sony, Warner Bros, Disney etc)

See this comment [0] in this thread, the current incarnation of youtube is the result of millions spent in legal fees. What's the incentive to do it all over again with little hope of success? IIRC YouTube wasn't profitable until very recently.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32160488
ML inference in the browser seems like the most immediate use case.
This might be the best book on the topic. It covers in detail the hard math of water rights, and how more rights were apportioned than there is water in the river most years.
I feel like I've been hearing this same story every few months for a decade. Despicable.
"... to have the privilege of being allowed to walk home with Gödel" is closer, but still not quite the correct tone.
Japan is 100v. North America is 120v, not 110v.
> There are other third parties, and you could make your own (the most popular one, you might be surprised to hear, didn't exist a few years ago).

Am I reading this right? Are you suggesting that because LetsEncrypt exists noe, the user should roll their own CA, and have it entrusted by all major browsers?

That's obvious absurd and unachievable. Especially compared to the _existing and functional_ solution of HTTP.
> Syncing to other platforms is just more work and doesn't prevent the primary problem.

Maybe, but my objection isn't to the fact that she doesn't want to use alternative platforms. That's understandable. It's to how she looks down on people who dare to make that suggestion.
Does nuclear (or could it) make financial sense for cargo transport though?

For the military, where victory is far more important than margins, sure. But can it compete with fossil fuel when there is a profit motive?
This is true on average, but of the available nuclear technologies, reactors used on ships and subs have the highest enriched uranium (making them inherently more dangerous just as a target of non nuclear nations). I believe they are also responsible for a large number of accidents, although when those occur, the affected personnel are usually limited to the crew.
Reverse engineering the GPU and implementing a clusterforth running on the GPU itself.
It’s not selective memory.

Formats such as 101, 102, etc. we’re discontinued long before I was born.

On the other hand, my grandparents had a Kodak instant camera instead of a Polaroid, I am in some of those pictures, and it was a proprietary format.

Technicolor is another Kodak only film format, and Kodak was in the business of leasing the cameras to movie studios.

Not that I have hate for Kodak or love for Sony or vice versa. I don’t have many strong emotions around brands.

Ring, Nest, Alexa, Siri, Windows, NEF, CR3 etc etc the world is full of proprietary systems.

Even John Deere combines.

BTW, the Kodak business model for APS was selling new equipment to photo labs. Existing machines could not process it in a way that did what consumers were told APS would do.
>The fact that the suggested solution in Python is to give every Python script a full copy of an entire specific Python runtime (via venv) is a mild annoyance as a design pattern...to me.

It's not just a mild annoyance, it's a sad statement about python as a community of developers that this is not only accepted but recommended.

I write python because some of what I do occurs in the domains where python makes the most sense, but the idea that the python community accepts venv rather than considering the fact that venv even exists at all to be a source of profound embarassment is mystifying to me.
Current consumption patterns didn't exist a century ago. Some alternatives to petroleum-powered consumption are already cheaper and more convenient than their petroleum-powered equivalents. Today landscaping tools and heat pumps, tomorrow cars and trucks, later ships and construction equipment, and maybe someday airliners. That combined with regulatory carrots and sticks will change consumption patterns. A century ago, people in cities burned a LOT of coal for heating. Air pollution in urban areas was pretty awful. We've changed consumption patterns before and we can do it again.

Imagine that we decarbonize most of our economy and mostly stop accelerating climate change, with a combination of renewables and nuclear. But somewhere in the world, a nuclear reactor melts down every 5 years. Sometimes it's like TMI and sometimes it's like Chernobyl.

Is that better overall than destabilizing Earth's climate?
>"If you build a simple, lower-end chip, you do so by giving it fewer hardware resources - fewer things where the implementation is via gates."

I'm not following this doesn't the microcode control the gates?
Nuclear would be much, much more expensive than battery for this application.

In these energy-related threads, it seems like there's always a top comment extolling the virtues of nuclear power, whether the link mentioned nuclear or not. And I would just encourage you to do the research about what nuclear costs. Safety is a red herring. We're not building out nuclear because it costs 2-4x more per kilowatt than wind or solar. [1]

[https://www.reuters.com/article/us-energy-nuclearpower/nucle...]
What a bizarrely dismissive comment. You could just as easily say that some developers miss a lot of the legal technicalities, which explains why they believe Schrems II is an unreasonable ruling.
Yeah, Ruby is like poetry.

Most poetry is like https://hitchhikers.fandom.com/wiki/Vogon_poetry.

And the worst is that I'm unable to do poetry.

---

I'm enthusiast about learning about languages, and enjoy everything I see about APL, Ruby, Scheme, Forth, Haskell, etc. I actually LIKE the concepts.

Is kind of relaxing take a look around the basic tutorial or read what the "good" poets say about that.

But my instinct tell me it will be torture to live like a poet.

So, for actual work, is much better (for me) all languages that have restriction and strict ideas about stuff.

- Python FORCE indentation? SOLD!

- Pascal DEMAND declare all before use? GIVE ME MORE!

- Rust SMASH YOUR HEAD at every keystroke? SHUT UP, TAKE MY MONEY!
I wonder what busybox_x86-64 does.

https://busybox.net/downloads/binaries/1.35.0-i686-linux-mus...
Yes, up until the mention of multiple inheritance, I thought the post was mediocre satire.
The trouble is that YouTube is more of a social phenomenon than a technical platform. There's been countless technical recreations of YouTube, but people don't want to be there, they want to be part of the YouTube movement so to speak. They want to be YouTubers, they want to talk to YouTubers, watch YouTubers and so on. No one wants to be a Vimeoer.

Videographers want to upload their videos to Vimeo, and it's just as good of a video platform as YouTube (better in some ways). But there's no social movement around it, or many other video platforms, and that's what people actually congregate to.
It’s an absolute right, and one of the main points of GDPR, unless there are another law[0] stating that you can keep it, for a specific reason. Like financial transactions. When that law expires then GDPR kicks in. The company doesn’t own your data, you do.

[0] https://gdpr-info.eu/art-17-gdpr/
The problem being, there must be at least one, unique competitor of critical mass. Otherwise, YT will be always the dominant platform.
SpaceX Defector Is Aiming to Land on Mars Before Elon Musk
Generic PHP command line flags parse library
So, you miss burnout? lol
Is it? I thought that once the situation was contested by both sides, youtube had the option to default either way, and it was simply their deci$ion to side with claimants because the traditional claimants held a ton of media licenses while individual creators held few.
But in the scheme of things, that’s fine. There are several nuclear subs and munitions at the bottom and there aren’t reports of terrible radiological effects.
> Mueller, a former lumberjack, ran the Elon Musk-led company's propulsion department for more than a decade. He made substantial contributions to the engines that now power SpaceX's workhorse rockets, including the Falcon 9 and Dragon spacecraft.
Different people are going to interpret what she said in different was. In my case it was Fran venting her frustration. In my case, I realize she wasn't making a copyright claim, but it doesn't take much of a stretch of the imagination to imagine somebody out there would interpret Fran's words in that manner.
The second thing. Python includes the current working directory first in the module search path. It leads to the above issue and occasionally some a tricky debugging problem.
Every time I speak out against taxes... I'm ridiculed. Well, this is what you bought!
I couldn't make it through. I felt deeply uncomfortable hearing her working 15 hour days to make the executives millionaires. I'm sure she was well compensated too, but it made me feel physically uneasy. Something feels quite wrong with our society at large.