skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't see how it will work in anyones' favor except Republicans to run a candidate known for their abuses just because Trump got away with it so far.
The fact that front-end developers and UI designers use different tools leads to them working separately, which is the actual problem.

Unfortunately, this is ultimately a talent/hiring issue, as it's easier to hire developers who have zero design experience and vice versa. When you treat people like interchangeable cogs, you don't get good collaboration.
> It's totally reasonable to be disgusted at how convinced people can be that the conservative project won't come at us with a dangerous national abortion ban with no exceptions and then come for contraception, who you can marry, what your kids learn, how you pray and whose property rights are worth as little as their right to marry and have sex.

I don't think it's reasonable at all, because I think you're dealing in a particularly exaggerated caricature of Republicans (you're parroting all of the talking points from the most detached left-wing "media outlets"). Notably, 55% of Republicans support gay marriage in 2022 per Gallup--the idea that they're "coming for gay marriage" is ridiculous. Moreover, "what your kids learn" is something everyone is concerned about and have been concerned about for the last 50 years (recall it used to be the left that pushed back against indoctrination of children in schools). This is just baseless moral panic / hyperventilation, and its only function is to spread hate and division.
Are you talking about banning Teslas for government use or on government ground? That's not a scandal at all, that's just taking security precautions. These precautions may or may not be right, but nothing about these precautions were about kicking Tesla out of the country, nor banning Tesla use under the general public. In complete contrast to how Huawei was handled in the west.
Because they are not actually links (as in `<a>` elements) but they are `<i>` elements (italics) that are formatted differently and also opens a new tab when you click on it.

But they are not common links, which is stupid. Hovering the "link" doesn't display the URL in the browser, right-clicking doesn't understand it's a link (because it's not), you can't open it in a new window as the creator of these "links" didn't consider that behavior (shift+click) and they are not accessible in the least.

TLDR: author re-implemented their own links, with more drawbacks than they could imagine
Chevy Blazer EV
Honestly, this is a weird thing to see. My parents just... did it, while so many people wait for the perfect time, have kids into their 40s, and then have to deal with teenagers in their 60s. Perhaps not for everyone, but there are perks.
> The countries pointing fingers at Brazil all did the same to become more developed and to make their population richer, they just want to stop Brazil from doing the same so they can keep the prices of commodities they sell higher.

My point is that what made US/EU rich isn't what Brazil is doing. And even if it were, what makes a country rich pre-1900 won't exactly work in 2022. Brazilians could buy machinery from other countries. They don't have to go trough some mini industrial revolution again.
https://archive.ph/vNeEr
Did you wait until after you got covid to take the vaccine?

There is a known danger of bear attacks[1] and we have a safe & effective countermeasure. Why not be prepared?

[1] https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/bears-eat-wealthy-coupl...
You can recreate it, it's just the original VM you setup gets disabled, so it's about any services you had running on that particular VM. Sorry, I wasn't clear in my explanation.
The point isn't that this is "immoral".

The advice is simply that it's self-sabotaging to choose the design language of low-value infomercial type websites.
Hahaha, I really like the "painter" terminology. A+
The roads on the other hand…
Cave Generator by Watabou
On the other hand, what is not "evil" when misused?
Maybe, but its effects and after effects were also blown out of proportion by nuclear power opponents.
AIUI, you don't need to use D with a garbage collector. It can be disabled.
High‐dose Vitamin B6 supplementation reduces anxiety
What about sharing a link with an unauthenticated user? Last I checked, Drive lets you create a public download link for your files.
Hmm... sort of like gentrification on a national scale.
I think the outcome was anticipated (we talk basically about it since the sanctions started). Nonetheless the result is a crisis. No one is surprised.
> a senile man who can barely talk straight

"Look, having nuclear — my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart..."
May as well just cut out the middle man.
I always love the nuclear arguments of "It's SAFE!" immediately followed by, "We just need to remove those pesky safety regulations to make it economical."
> if we wanted to have a more sane system, we'd remove second order incentives in favor of direct first order regulations. but, that would require constitutional amendments which are unlikely to pass.

I detest both arguments. The drinking age didn't stop under-21's from drinking. They just don't do it publicly. You're correct in that governments shouldn't use legislative carrots and sticks to influence state policies. But I disagree that direct federal control is a replacement for philosophical reasons as well as the fact that the government already tried the more honest approach of passing a constitutional amendment to regulate the consumption of alcohol only to have it blowback on them. And due to the resulting backlash and unenforcability, the government passed another amendment to deregulate it. As the old saying goes, prohibition doesn't work.
But does this include pedestrians and bikers who are killed by vehicles?
It's just another way people say "me too" online.
This is why I said not for Germany.

I don't see the rest as major issues. Again, power lines through a tiny tiny tiny fraction of nature are not a biggie.

I just always have to compare... coal? Weird plans to pump CO2 underground, as if it'll never escape?

I prefer dams over nuclear. Beavers cause more change on rivers than our dams.

But I am not against nuclear!
Great, sounds like you engineered things for your expected temperature ranges.

Story here is a major piece of infrastructure is experiencing temperatures outside of its designed-for temperature range.
Disallow: /ld200304/minutes/041011/ldminute.htm
At this point the same goes for nuclear, if a reactor is offline you need some coal and or gas backup. Unless you have hydro.
Bonhoeffer argues stupidity is a moral failing, not an intellectual one [1].

So if you believe Bonhoeffer, then it can be argued armchair intellectuals have an obligation to not be stupid. And perhaps Germany and France should fine the stupid, or possibly put them in prison.

[1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ww47bR86wSc
Software is one of the key aspects of the history of copyright maximalism, too. If you strictly applied the utility rule, software would only be patentable, not copyrightable. However, CONTU made a big mistake and convinced Congress to grant software copyright, which created a whole bunch of unanswered legal questions that are only now getting resolution through judicial legislation[0].

A decade and change later when Intel started asking for hardware copyright[1], Congress actually realized their mistake and created a sui generis right for integrated circuit designs ("maskwork rights"). We never complain about maskwork cases because they are incredibly limited, have a 10 year lifespan, and basically only cover direct copying. Software would have been no different had Congress not made the mistake of handing the full enchilada of copyright monopoly protection - including all those pesky questions about derivative works - to software companies.

[0] e.g. is linking infringement? can you copyright interfaces?

[1] Fun fact: before this, it was entirely legal to X-ray chips and reproduce them. In fact, the NES famously shipped with a bootleg 6502 that only had decimal mode missing because that was the only thing MOS could patent.
Yeah I love baseball but I gave up on MLB games. I used to travel to do that, now I just watch the home minor league games and even travel to other cities to those those teams. I realized that I had just as much fun at high school games as I ever did at the big guy games so MLB and other minor league stuff is quite fun. Similar, I find smaller parks and venues to go to. They all coast 1/10 - 1/2 as much as "the big guys" and my family has probably more fun as things are less crowded and hectic. We still go to some "major" stuff occasionally but not like when I was growing up. Things were way less refined and cushy and more affordable and less hectic.
Reliance on products, power, etc from less free nations is an inherent security / economic risk. It's hard to get around that.
Orioles are dirt cheap if you want to take the MARC up for some baseball, though. And the MARC itself is 7 bucks
I guess I should amend that to mention that market size matters...the Reds, Mets, and Tigers are kind of AAA-ish.
"GET" should not be used for anything that changes state (beyond simple logging of requests).

I'm an AppSec engineer and if I were doing a penetration test and found that an endpoint was using GET requests for state changes, I'd consider it a serious enough bug to put it on the report, even if it wasn't a security issue.
I actually used it to hire voice actors for a few games/apps I made. Very much enjoyed the community. One guy would submit auditions for parts and intentionally read for the characters in a strange way.
Why is this (and the previous functionality) being rolled out seemingly exclusively in Latin American countries?
The article mentioned a section "buckled" - this is the more likely outcome. When designing roads/runways, engineers design for the most likely thermal range. This is then used to determine how much expansion to account for. You'll see this most commonly on bridges, with sections of "teeth" that allow for large expansion/contraction ranges, since the bridge can't expand in the same way a ground road can.

In this case, its likely more a matter of runways needing more precision, and therefore the design allowance on the range of extreme temps being much lower. I'm sure a civil engineer could explain better.
We of course need to overbuild. You can do x4 for off shore wind and still come out ahead of nuclear. That map also corresponds to the time of year solar works 16 hours per day in Europe. It also shows that France Italy and the eastern part of the Baltics had more wind than usual.
Two of those articles are pre-war; bit weird to cite given the difference in Russian performance between the theoretical and the in-practice thus far.

Russia having lots of artillery tubes and shells has never been in doubt; it's other logistical aspects they seem to have struggled with. The gains in the Donbas are small, incremental, and balanced fairly well by losses near Kherson and Kharkiv. For the main axis of an invasion by one of the world's largest militaries, it's not much to brag about thus far.
Why Jane Fonda? I know she protested arctic drilling during the Obama years, but other than starring in The China Syndrome, a work of fiction she neither wrote nor directed and was not the only actor to star in, what did she ever have to do with nuclear protesting?
Swing and a miss, but thanks for trying
The question didn't start with trying to take reasonable stock of both sides.
Block universe, as a theory, is based on classical (non-quantum) relativity, and its model of 4-dimensional spacetime. It is not based on QM. Non-relativistic QM does not even use spacetime. Relativistic QM, aka quantum field theory, does use it, but is not a deterministic model and does not treat spacetime as fixed in the sense of all events within it being determined in advance.

> we’re just exploring one probabilistic trace through it

There is no such thing as a "probabilistic trace" through a deterministic 4-dimensional spacetime in which all events are fixed in advance.
I used Logo when I was in middle school, in the early 90s and not in the US. Looking back, it was an extraordinary and before-normal-times introduction to the world of computer programming.
But at the time I did not know the importance of programming for my future personal and professional life, and certainly my classmates, almost all of whom came from blue-collar backgrounds, did not appreciate it either.
I basically do this with Dropbox, Emacs, and git, but just for shared 'personal' note taking/journaling amongst multiple devices.
Yes.

I thought so too!

I just had the impression, that this was too much and I'm simply missing something obvious.
You're welcome to buy Disney shares and subsidize disneyland-gooers at your own expense.
Because there's also a known danger of mental health challenges with astronauts and that risk must be weight against potential bear attacks.
> at some temperature it is no longer under tension and above that it becomes in compression and then you have risk of the rails buckling. If I recall correctly, in England the track is tensioned for 27C (a typical hot summers day temperatures)

While the basic gist is correct, a certain amount of compression is fine, too, because the trackbed can resist a certain amount of sideways buckling force, especially once the track has settled in a bit. It's only when the buckling forces caused by the temperature expansion and resultant compression exceed the sideways resistance of the trackbed that you get buckling.

Besides, rail temperatures on a hot summer day in the sun will definitively be higher than 27 °C – that value just happens to be the neutral temperature between maximum allowable compression and maximum allowable tension, whatever those temperatures exactly are.
I think that part of the effect is headline cost inflation. All sorts of businesses are incentivized to price discriminate (since people now have vastly different purchasing power), and they usually do it by setting a high default price and then giving all sorts of discounts to groups that they want to incentivize.

This happens in medicine (headline rate vs insurance negotiated rate), it happens in education (sticker price vs average price paid), it happens on Amazon (see the preponderance of coupon clipping / sales to get around price tracker sites like camelcamelcamel).

For a few more examples: tinder discriminates directly (older people charged more), onlyfans runs promotions for new members (just like cable companies). Traveling escorts will change their rates depending on the cities that they're touring, based on what the market will bear... etc. In the 1940s and 50s you could get big problems for trying to generate big profits - and there was a 90% excess profits tax in the 40s to drain all of the excess fiscal stimulus back out of the economy. As the after-effects of those policies wore off, price discrimination came back.

Price discrimination is the name of the game in today's world.
> Prudently and reasonably

Except they were jailing people for going on hikes and to the beach, which as science showed was actually counterintuitive. Not all Democrats acted on the science, but instead hypocritically and authoritarianly tried jumping ahead of science rather than taking a rational thought-out approach.
I've had somewhere around 30-35 jobs in my life. Part time, full time, not including contracting (I'm in my 50s and my first 1040 job was at age 13 over the summer... you could do that back then. I was paid $1.10 an hour, raised to $1.25 the next summer and I saved up $150 to buy a TRS-80).

Many of them I enjoyed, some I stayed for years, some I left very shortly, but I've never ever once regretted leaving a job and moving on and every time it has worked out better for me (I think). But maybe I just had really bad jobs.
Eat the Rich popsicles depict one-percenters – Boing Boing
I think that's a productive analogy that can be read in many different ways!

For example, you could argue that Haskell makes tradeoffs to provide benefits that most developers don't care about most of the time, such as code terse enough to include in papers with a page count limit; and that this is a valid reason for people to prefer languages that prioritize other things, which is why Haskell hasn't caught on (thus the Haskell motto "avoid success at all costs").

Or you could read it as a clueless argument ascribing disadvantages to Haskell that it in fact does not have. This would be more difficult if the person making the argument were Simon Peyton Jones, since he presumably isn't mistaken about Haskell as such, but he might still have erroneous beliefs about the world that affect Haskell's use in practice.

To take the discussion up a level, Rogers's factors in the diffusion of innovations are (perceived) "relative advantage", "compatibility", "complexity", "trialability, "reinvention potential", and "observed effects". If we accept this model, the failed diffusion of an innovation such as REST or Haskell doesn't necessarily imply that it has little relative advantage, or even little perceived relative advantage; it might be that they're incompatible with other established practices, are difficult to learn ("complex"), require heavy up-front commitment ("trialability"), hard to repurpose for unintended uses ("reinvention"), or hard to observe the use of.

In fact, the diffusion literature consists almost entirely of research on diffusing innovations that had great difficulty diffusing despite having dramatic relative advantages, at least according to the authors.

That still doesn't mean we should comfortably dismiss assertions that one or another innovation doesn't actually confer a relative advantage.
So you think fair elections are less important than your own security? You may have a problem after your country turns authoritarian, even if your computer is secure.
"has" is not correct it should be "as".

A later sentence in the article is formed similarly and correctly uses "as" - "The runway also 'melted' at the RAF Brize Norton, military air base in Oxfordshire, west of London, on Monday as the UK struggled to cope with the weather."
500 Mile Email Bug
If anything, I would speculate that it was the effectiveness of Russian gas lobbyists after Fukushima, convincing Germany to decommission all their nuclear power plants.
Oh, Russia are and have been for decades now, VERY GOOD at throwing heckloads of people and mid-late Soviet-artillery at A Situation to 'win' it. They tend to be somewhat Pyrrhic victories, but what does that matter when you utterly control the domestic narrative? The basic strategy of total annihilaton is the same one beloved of Stalin, who called artillery "the God of war". He wasn't wrong, but I'm not sure the people underneath it much appreciate its effectivity.

I don't think anyone beyond the ever-optimistic has at any point disputed that Russia has huge stocks of weaponry to draw from - it just doesn't have a lot of particularly technological or, dare I say it, 'graceful' weaponry to deploy.

Anyway, point here being that Russia doesn't have hypersonic weaponry in the vein tested by America here.

They do appear to want to invest in Satan-class mega ICBMs and even a nuclear-powered [highly-polluting] cruise missile, or the submarine-based nuke which 'could wipe out the British Isles' which is Putin's wet dream. Subtle. Think of the outcry if anyone in the west even considered such ridiculousness in this day and age... .

ed - anti-speed edits
ESG is a tool that certain political parties can use to "give to their friends" and "take from their enemies". Anyone who doesn't toe the line will find their ESG rating dropping (see Tesla: https://theconversation.com/how-a-sustainability-index-can-k...)
For me it's more about just how boring state fairs are. Maybe if you have young kids that want to pet a goat or are really into fried oreos on a stick.

You said "state park" which is a very different thing than what GP was talking about. I like Disney alright but spending time in nature at a state park can be just as fun IMO. State fair though? Count me out.
And you still have no dispatchable solution.
That's funny because Merkel herself was a Kremlin's project :)
Both. Twitter used Musk's own momentum against him.
There's a cliff between America spying on their citizens (to see trends and to catch criminals that make themselves statistically relevant) and China spying on Americans (to commit ideological subterfuge).

Not that either are good, but given that some of the Chinese powers that be consider America to be an enemy the potential consequences are terrifying.
Yes. It's not only virtue signaling, but a deceitful way to control policies and investments. It's not for the environment, but for power and profit.
This is still a venture capital/investment forum, just handwaving away these economic dynamics, without even trying to explain how to replace them, does not really add much to the debate.

It's the equivalent of somebody pointing out; "This is too expensive, we can't finance building or running it" and somebody replying with "Money is just invented, it's not real!".

As true as that might be philosophically, practically it still doesn't change anything because the practical reality we live in is dominated by economic interests manifested trough money.

So if your solution does need massive amounts of money, then you need to explain where they money is supposed to come from, as you can't just "wish" nuclear reactors into existence.
Trunk Merge
Trunk Merge is an intelligent service that orchestrates merging pull requests to maintain a repository of code that always passes tests. Airbnb, Uber, Twitter, Robinhood, and many other big tech companies internally have their own sophisticated merge queues. Now, you can get the same thing without having to build it.
I don’t know, Windscale for example did not seem to have much of an effect, and it was much worse. The way it’s spun in the media has much more weight than the actual risks in most people’s mind.
I am in fact American. Just being real-- everyone has our data already.
Certainly. I'm not saying there is no way to do something like this. This post just doesn't offer anything.

It complains about environmental matters, and then it goes on to complain about weight. Make one wonder if the author has ever weighed a car-sized battery.
Show HN: Launching Sustainable License, an Alternative to Open Source
Modularity for International Internet Governance
If SUVs were genuinely solving a widespread problem that would otherwise involve people owning multiple cars, I suspect that we would all hear a lot from environmentalists about them.

Anecdotally, when I've met "real" people who live in remote areas, they tend to drive old, unglamourous, and often semi broken cars. Wealthy second home owners, city folk practising an outdoor activity on the odd weekend, suburbanites keeping up with the neighbours, etc. are the ones who feel the need to buy new vehicles suitable for conditions they experience once in a blue moon, if ever.
> how to do it without exceeding an already enormous budget by a factor of four as with Olkiluoto

How about imprisoning the responsible for the exceeded budget?

How does Microsoft/Walmart deal with someone promising a thing will cost X but then costs 4X?