skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Digital lending has no legal basis in either the controlled or uncontrolled format. In fact, the argumentation is suspiciously similar to the ReDigi case. Courts generally have upheld that first sale ends when copying begins, even if the end result is the moral equivalent of a sale rather than a copy[0]. And, indeed, the publishers were grumbling about controlled digital lending (CDL) before IA pulled the National Emergency Library (NEL) stunt.

The lack of legal foundation for CDL is not entirely an accident, however. First sale and similar copyright exhaustion doctrines are hard-fought and won rights of the reader. But these rights rely on the fact that no actual copying is taken place. When you interact with any copyrighted work using a computer, there is an almost gratuitous amount of copying going on. If you so much as cough on the work, you are breaching copyright. Publishers know this, and they have been very successful ramming "licensed and not sold" language through the court system.

The funny thing is, while pirates have been stereotyped as waving their hands in the air and shouting "technology" to opt out of the law, publishers have been way more successful at doing the same, even though they fought tooth and nail against digital distribution.

[0] In the ReDigi case the "digital resale" software was even specifically engineered to erase parts of the file as they were sent to the new owner so that the number of duplicate bits floating around would be negligible at any particular time.
> personal info is one way to keep child predators aware of the fact that their actions can be traced back to a real person.

And in case of a data leak, all the (anonymous) predators know which players are children and where they live.
Although the entire socket can be rotated 90* for even better traces, which is what the EVGA Kingpin motherboards do ( https://www.evga.com/articles/01543/EVGA-Z690-DARK-KINGPIN/ )
New recrods detail DHS' purchase and use of vast quantities of cellphone data
one more that supports the latest standards: https://pdm.fming.dev/
Why don't they make an issue assistant AI bot? A GPT-3 chatbot for navigating the offer and finding stuff.
Good luck and thanks for all your work on Go!
usually you find a market by scratching your own itch.

helps if you have breadth of knowledge and experience in a variety of fields also. interdisciplinary solutions still have plenty of untapped market potential

other than that there is no magic formula that i know of. its kind of one of those "if you have to ask..." type things.
I don't think he does however I think I'll post a quick analysis by me here:

1. India: Pretty much on-demand

All women can terminate pregnancy (for a valid* reason) on advice of one doctor upto 20 weeks.
Note: Valid reason can be as simple as failure of contraceptive, economic difficulty, or risk of death

In special cases (rape, incest, women being a minor*, change in marital status, mental illness, or fetal anomalies) it can be done upto 24 weeks.

Moreover a pregnancy can be terminated anytime in case fetal anomalies are found later in pregnancy, however it requires approval from a board (which consists of a gynecologist, radiologist/sonologist, pediatrician, and other members decided by the state)

India (and China) had a rampant problem with sex selective termination, this has been combated by making it illegal to reveal the child's sex before birth. In practice, till 2021 failure of contraceptive was not recognized as a valid reason for termination of pregnancy in unmarried women. Furthermore high abortion costs, lack of awareness, and societal stigma, make unsafe (and illegal) abortions rampant (accounting for 56% of abortions)

* Consent of minor's guardian is needed to perform a termination

2. China: on-demand

China's one child policy made abortions a "remedial" measure to fight overpopulation. So in some way it was encouraged.

Abortions seem to have little oversight, however some regions do ban non-medically necessary abortions after 14 weeks of pregnancy. Sex selective abortions (and pre-natal sex determination) are illegal.

3. South Korea: on-demand

It used to be be legal only for reason like genetic disorders, rape, incest or threatens the life of the women. However in 2019, the Constitutional court declared the law unconstitutional, now it's legal for upto 14 weeks. (Upto 24 weeks in case of previously specified reasons)

4. Singapore: on-demand

Upto 16 weeks: Must be done by a authorized medical practitioner.

16-24 weeks: Must be done by a authorized medical practitioner with surgical or obstetric qualifications.

After 24 weeks: Can be done if life of women is in danger

Only consent of pregnant women is needed for termination, even in case of minors.

Side note: You need to be a citizen of Singapore or hold a work visa and have been in Singapore for > 4 months to get a abortion, this means you can't travel to Singapore for a abortion.

5. Thailand: on-demand

Can be terminated on demand (upto 12th week!), can be done anything in case of rape, risk to women's life or fetal impairment.

Minors need permission from guardian.

In practice: Majority of population follows Buddhism, and often regard abortion as a taboo, this puts Adolescents at risk whose parents might not support a abortion. Not to mention a large number of physicians are unwilling to perform abortions because of their beliefs.

6. Japan: Legal only in case of rape, endangerment to health or economic difficulty. (upto 22 weeks)

In Practice: Exceptions are broad enough that it is widely accepted and practiced, effectively being quasi on-demand.
I've encountered input libraries in go tha for some reason just grab all the signals and whatnot, so you can't ctrl+c, sighup, sigterm, use ctrl+z to return to the shell… the only option is to do a kill -9 from a different shell.

Great library indeed :D
I don't think it is very difficult to understand the difference.

In the Netflix scenario, you know that you are purchasing a subscription service that lets you access content owned/distributed/licensed by Netflix. They aren't advertising that you can own Stranger Things, for example. They advertise that you can watch Stranger Things on-demand. I don't know of anyone who has purchased a Netflix subscription and thought that they own copies of everything on Netflix.

In the game scenario, you believe that you are purchasing the game. That's how they market it. The expectation is that once you've made that transaction, you now own that copy of that game to do with as you more or less please. Play it offline, run a local server, put it away and pick it up 10 years from now and still be able to play it, etc.

It's increasingly apparent that in many cases, even when you buy something from a game store (MS, Sony, etc.) that you aren't actually purchasing the game, you're purchasing the rights to access it through a particular service. But that's not how the advertise it. And no, I don't think burying this fact behind a few thousand words of legalese is really addressing the issue at all.

If you don't understand why that distinction might upset people, I don't know what to say.
Docker is linux specific. It can only run in a VM on non-linux platforms.
Sounds like nothing a little liquid nitrogen can't fix.

> (as a standard metric, about once every 64 milliseconds)

64 milliseconds? wow.. I thought they'd need refreshing way more often
You cannot be serious. Here in Maine, we have a partially deregulated system, and our wind turbines do not shut down in the Winter.
If people voluntarily give up their rights in order to feel a sense of belonging with a religion that is their prerogative. It is not fine for those people to attempt to enforce those restrictions on people outside of their religion.

If those people are causing actual harm to the community then it should be brought up through the secular legal process where lawmakers will weigh the harm to the community vs. the harm to personal liberty before deciding if the law is worth it.
Awkward last sentence. I needed to reread it multiple times to parse correctly.
RSS was, to make a slightly cliche paraphrase, a more elegant web for a more civilized age. It was user controlled content consumption. It declined because it conflicts with the "addict them and stuff their eyeballs with intrusive personalized ads" monetization model of the post 2010 internet.
One of my friends does 3D printed and resin casted cosplay armor/props out of his garage. Low volume, high margins.
Right, my point is that this is a class of attacks which are only relevant to a specific, small class of users. It's irrelevant to users who have intentionally enabled any kind of network communications on their computer, and it's also irrelevant to users who have robust controls on what code is executing on their system, or who run untrusted code in an environment which isolates it from hardware (like a virtual machine).

So, in short, it only affects ineptly managed secure environments.
A single data center is not reliable. We all know in 2022 that having a backup offsite is important. No data center can offer 100% uptime in perpetuity.
I see http://csszengarden.com is missing.

I've always marveled at the different realizations produced by only(?) changing the CSS.

I've never understood the great lengths people go to make designs seemingly impossible to grok or manage, so I'd love to hear from those with more experience than I.
It’s worthwhile to me and that’s what matters.

“Does my idea hold up?” Is better answered by floating an actual boat down an actual river than by private conjecture.
> It would be a race to the bottom cloning people, consuming all available compute resources, just to maintain status quo of political power.

At least natural humans are rate-limited by gestation periods, but this isn't that far off from how some religious groups view their role in the world.
i can only speak for myself. i reserve raising my voice for where it's APPROPRIATE. as with the python/go debate, aesthetics are subjective.
This work has been coordinated with the Rust Foundation.
To make the organ donation scenario analogous to most abortion scenarios you need to make it so the person being asked or required to donate directly caused the donee to need the organ for survival, and it is an organ donation that the owner recovers well from most of the time such as a liver donation (liver donations from living donors just take part of the liver, and the remaining liver will regrow the taken part).

We probably still would not force an organ donation in such a case, still leaving it entirely up to the person, but their choice could affect the consequences for them depending on how and why they caused the person to need the organ. If they choose to donate and save the person then they might only be looking at some kind of endangerment charge for causing the person to need an organ. If they choose to let the person die they might be looking at murder charges.
But C++ had generics ages ago already… You never used those?
Different layers: the call to the api was successful on the transport Layer, thus 200. You messed up something in the business logic or you asked for a resource that's not there. While often you will get a 404, this is wrong: the http call is successful. The endpoint did not vanish. You just asked for something the business end could not deliver. The Protocol is fine with your call.
> Similarly, the argument goes, you should have the legal right to have an abortion (or at least induce labor, if viability is possible) at any point during a pregnancy.

This is an example of taking some oversimple principle, and applying it too consistently without consideration of complicating factors.

If you induced labor at many points after the "point of viability," the baby still has a large change of dying or suffering harm even with long, intensive, and expensive care in a NICU:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late_termination_of_pregnancy#...:

> Long-term survival is possible after 22 weeks.[59] However, odds of long-term survival between 22 and 23 weeks are 2–3 percent and odds of survival between 23 and 24 weeks are 20 percent.[60] "Intact survival", which means survival of a neonate without subsequent damage to organs such as the brain or bowel is 1% at 22 weeks and 13% at 23 weeks.[60]
> Also, I was responding to a blanket assertion that you have no constitutional rights in a private forum. A company town is a private forum.

But your own stuff explicitly stated that the courts did not deem it a private forum but was a public form.

Websites are not the same thing, so yes a website is still a private forum and therefore not in violation of 1A.
I read the wikipedia article, it seems there were multiple failings at various levels of government that allowed that clinic to remain open.
And where did I comment on the gruesome nature of what was done? It's the fact he was responsible for the deaths of mothers and infants post- delivery (earning him the title of convicted serial killer) that provoked my reaction.
I can only hope that every effort is made to ensure women in states where well-regulated clinics are no longer operating are able to travel as needed to access them.
Why "infamous"? In any case, Levy did win his bet when there had been no computer chess engine that could beat him in ten years after betting against McCarthy and Michie [1]. Despite that he acknowledge that chess engines had improved further than he had thought:

>> Levy wrote, "I had proved that my 1968 assessment had been correct, but on the other hand my opponent in this match was very, very much stronger than I had thought possible when I started the bet."[37] He observed that, "Now nothing would surprise me (very much)."[38]

(Edit: the quote is from your WP link.)

So that at least really does not match the pattern you mention. Levy's evaluation of chess engines was pretty much in the water, all the way up to Kasparov's loss to Deep Blue. As far as I can tell he never said anything like "the machines can't really play chess" as the OP suggested. He just made a prediction about how much they could advance in ten years. And he was right.

I would therefore like more justification for your assertion that "that's the way it is in AI". I would also like a clarification: who are the "people" who say all those things? How representative are they of experts and researchers?

Who makes all those naive predictions about the impossibility of AI that are later proven wrong? For the time being, it seems that naive predictions can be traced more directly to luminaries of the field, like Alan Turing or Marvin Minsky [2], who predict that AI is "just around the corner", rather than skeptics and naysayers who say it wont' happen, as is usually suggested.

And then of course, there's Rodney Brooks' dated predictions, so far standing the test of time (although that's a short time!) [3].

_______________

[1] Totally coincidentally, Donald Michie was my thesis advisor's thesis advisor, so I'm, like, his academic grandchild.

[2] See: https://web.eecs.umich.edu/~kuipers/opinions/AI-progress.htm...

"In 1958, Herbert Simon and Allen Newell wrote, “within ten years a digital computer will be the world’s chess champion”; note that this is 10 years before Levy and McCarthy's bet.

[3] https://rodneybrooks.com/predictions-scorecard-2022-january-...
Go has always been a Java, C#, Python, and Ruby killer. It has not and never will be a C or C++ killer. C is the language of libraries and embedded, neither of which Go is good for. C++ is the language of large systems that need extreme control over resource allocation. Go is not good for this either.
"Hit F10 to Save Changes"

I worked in an office at the advent of the Windows era, in those last years of DOS WP 5.1 dominance. Friends of mine were making steady money, writing printer drivers for the crazy range of laser printers coming to market.

I was the Macintosh Guy, and never developed a muscle memory for the WordPerfect key bindings.

Thank you, WordPerfect, for giving me bizarre keyboard commands for my BIOS settings.
Languages generally aren't stuck in time. If we actually want languages to evolve and in ways that are actually valuable to real people (not a small subset of those developers writing it), then these pieces should be an invaluable resource to help steer the language in the direction that will most reward adoption, longevity, etc.
What frameworks are everyone using to achieve small and fast page size?
It's funny to see this on the front page of HN. I knew Chinmay (one of the authors of the paper) back when he was an undergrad at Caltech. Super cool dude - I knew he'd go on to do great stuff! Very happy for the team that obtained this result.
The nice thing about such basic hand tools is that you usually get to learn from mistakes without permanent consequences. Will a child hurt themselves at least once with a saw and a hammer? Probably. Will they seriously hurt themselves? Probably not. Will they learn to not hurt themselves? Almost certainly.

I also don't remember how exactly supervision works, but it definitely isn't just dumping a bunch of kids at some unattended construction site. Parents and/or the team managing the place are at the very least nearby.
Because you made an error but you shouldn’t worry everything will be OK.
Insulation only works till the building is heat soaked then it makes it slower for the building to cool down and our houses are typically brick which holds heat well, uk houses have low airflow because it’s cold and wet much of the time so in summer the issue is that heat gets trapped in the day and we can’t get it out at night.

It’s currently about 6 degrees warmer in my bedroom than outside but with no wind I struggle to get the heat from inside to outside.
ActivityStreams is pretty much RSS on steroids. The whole Fediverse is built on that standard.
I was surprised to learn that mpv doesn't support the Raspberry Pi, and the maintainers don't seem interested in supporting it[0] even though VLC works fine.

[0] https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/issues/7492#issuecomment-9...
> From there, logic optimistically assumes a 'flawed' ontology.

Logic doesn't assume any ontology. You're free to treat it as a purely formal string-manipulation game if you really want to.

Approaching math or physics as if it were part of the humanities - close readings of primary sources, "genealogical" work, literary exegesis - is worse than useless. If you can't do math, you don't understand it. And if you don't understand math, productive engagement with the philosophy of mathematics is impossible.
dang, just because you disagree with someone doesn't make it unsubstantiated. You yourself have a very long history of doing what you accuse me of. Try to keep this on topic and not get into personal attacks.
Is it a mess? Yes. But, is the problem to be solved perhaps much simpler "in other languages"? Do you interface with C++ libraries, system-managed dependencies, and perhaps your GPU in these other languages? Or are all your dependencies purely coded in these other languages, making everything simpler?

Of course the answer to these questions could be anything but to me it feels like attacks on Python's package management are usually cheap shots on a much much more complicated problem domain than the "complainers" are typically aware of.
No, it's true in relation to the politics of ordinary Americans. Look at any polls on abortion, and you'll see that this type of ban is well on the fringes.

Even more so if you were to present this explicit situation - I'd bet even some of the most religious people you find would be hard pressed to say that a ten year old girl should be forced to carry that pregnancy to term.
I revived three ancient computers with ChromeOS Flex
The night I met Einstein (1955)
Because Apple cares about form as much as function and will not sacrifice form. It was almost a religious pursuit for Steve Jobs.
> The Supreme Court is expected to rule soon on election related issues.

The Supreme Court rules all the time on election related issues.

> I wouldn’t be surprised if they rule (correctly, based on the constitution) that every state can manage its own voting laws.

That's the status quo, except for certain element of various federal elections for which there is an explicit Congressional role.

What the pending case is about the independent state legislature theory, which is a legal theory that the State legislature, in deciding various election-related matters assigned to it by federal law and/or the US Constitution, is not bound by the State Constitution as interpreted by the State Supreme Court but instead has sole and unreviewable (so long as exercised within federal constraints) authority. This extends to things like redistricting; assignment of Presidential electors, including by retrospective nullification of a vote of the people for that purpose; setting process for Congressional elections; etc.

> What is also often overlooked is that each state is self-governing.

The ISL theory contradicts that idea, and essentially holds that the State Legislature, in conduct of federal elections, is an arm of the Federal government, outside of the mechanisms by which the people of the State have circumscribed the powers and exercises thereof by the State government.
If an API is truly RESTful does that automatically mean it's a high quality API? Does that mean it is functional, performant, reliable, secure, and generally well designed? No. An API can be RESTful and also trash. An API can also be non-REST and be amazing.

Is the author correct in that APIs are inaccurately calling themselves RESTful? Yes, yes they are very correct. Congratulations. Here's a trophy for being correct. Now let's focus on what matters, and that is building software that works and works well, REST or not.

Please dump the pedantry and focus on practicality.
The term is used wrong most of the time now, if you try to be more precise you're likely to confuse people not aware of the original meaning of REST. And there's not a really nice term for JSON-based web API that is as short as REST.

Many web APIs are not REST, but still take at least a tiny bit of inspiration from it. Mostly the resource-based structure, not so much any of the other stuff like HATOAS. In practice the self-describing nature simply isn't useful enough, so most people don't bother.
Or alive and kicking.
>There are plenty of good/trustworthy VPN services. They just don't advertise as much as the bad ones.

This is also why I always immediately unsubscribe from and stop watching any YouTuber who starts pushing these services. They are 100% shady. Which leaves only two possibilities; that the content creator is either naive or willfully complicit.
For folks who have announced funding rounds, how common have you found these kind of attacks?
Protecting business processes is a key point, and more security orgs need to focus on this for awareness. Good post here
The tools for EEs are old, creaky, text-based stuff from the DOS days.

Time to finally turn EE into a software discipline. Then some decent tools will be developed and normal folk will be willing to design stuff.
I used to see this happen with our old TV's at an old house with really bad grounding. I always wondered why it did that.

We could be playing a video game or movie, and set all the other tv's to channel 2 or something like that, while we played on channel 1. You could see the action on each of them. Almost 1:1 on the reaction times, albeit a little fuzzy.
very true! to be a WriteCloser[1], you have to be able to Write[2] and to Close[3]. quacking confirmed.

1. https://pkg.go.dev/io#WriteCloser

2. https://pkg.go.dev/io#Writer

3. https://pkg.go.dev/io#Closer