skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No. In the Hebrew Bible, Exodus 21, a man who inadvertently causes either a miscarriage or premature birth (the wording is uncertain) is liable for punishment by fine.

How much more so someone who deliberately kills an unborn child?

The early Christian communities also forbade abortion based on the Biblical idea of preservation of life. The Didache, an early Christian writing circa 70-100 AD, forbids abortion[0]:

> "Do no murder children through abortion nor kill them after they have been born."

And this should not be surprising, as Christianity was birthed from Judaism, and Judaism forbids abortion in all but extreme cases.[1]

[0]: https://blog.judahgabriel.com/2022/07/what-did-early-christi...

[1]: https://judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/39015/is-a-jew-p...
> If you want to export your feed list, this can be tedious

Does Google Takeout support Google Podcasts? That'd be the usual method of exporting everything from a Google product.
Dry air makes static electricity buildup more.
> with a terrible political system made 300 years ago by slavers

... a political system that was widely considered revolutionary and incredibly enlightened at the time, including (or especially) by Europeans, who lived under much less democratic forms of government.

I'm on your side on the abortion issue, but bashing the American Revolution and blaming the founders isn't going to help your cause, and it's just bad history.
Also, its very possible, and quite easy to just include the code for the library in your package

This only works if installing on exactly the same os and architecture. It can also make the installer for your quick little command line tool hundreds of megabytes.

That being said packing up the python interpreter and all dependencies is the approach I ended up using when shipping non-trivial python applications in the past.
Maybe not "this law I broke shouldn't exist" on its own, but "this law I broke shouldn't exist according to the constitution of our country" or "this law I broke shouldn't exist because it conflicts with this other guaranteed legal protection" is a perfectly ordinary defense. It's one of the core functions of a functioning judicial system.
The supreme court should throw out bad precedent. Court precedent that's bad is the worst because no one can overturn it.
Automated/generated content is against their policies.
This is unfortunately every issue in American discourse now though - the media obfuscates and confuses, instead of illuminating and hopefully educating. The media is the biggest cause of conflict in the US system now, because it's just become hyper-partisans shouting at each other and otherizing the other 50%.
Playing the devil advocate here but if we extend that logic to other things does it still work?

If a sovereign democratic country passes a law to murder 5% of its population, don't we have a moral obligation to intervene and prevent them to do so despite them being free, sovereign and democratic.

My point is: Moral obligations can compel you to ignore any other concept you value if you consider the problem serious enough.
Just posting here too, but yup this is exactly what I was trying to convey.

Hstore might have been the fastest but the way I am using it or the scales the use case could scale to might not work out.

Bigger benchmarks could have been done! Maybe a multi part post would have been better so I could split apart methodology and results/blabbering about approach!
Tape paper around it in a little cone shape. people will speak into the cone.
What is the proper format of the excel file?
No matter what I try the pdf fails to load.
Thanks! I followed through to the home page and the "SATAN updates" link:

>http://www.porcupine.org/satan/release-2-plan.html

>Release 2 is currently in the works - the original plan was to update SATAN on its first birthday, but that schedule has slipped.

sensiblechuckle.jpg
It certainly was a risk in 2013, when the open source libraries were slow and riddled with bugs. Today, there are two stable, well maintained and fast open source libraries available:

https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg
and
https://github.com/GrokImageCompression/grok

JPEG 2000 is a niche codec, but in the niches that it occupies it is the gold standard, even after 20 years:

1. digital cinema (part of the digital cinema standard) and broadcast
2. medical imaging
3. satellite imagery

For memory institutions, it still vies with Tiff as the top preservation codec.
Because the United States' founding documents explicitly set things up this way. The United States is not a European country, nor is it Canada. There is really no other country on earth like it from a legal perspective, especially of its population. You can decry the founding of the country all you want, but short of Constitutional amendments, it's not changing. States and the People retain any powers not explicitly granted to the federal government.
VSCode demolishes Vim and Emacs. Want something easier to extend? Write your own editor.
WordPerfect 6 did have an optional graphical mode that wrote directly to the framebuffer, I've never used it though!

Is it possible you're thinking of that?

There is a screenshot of it on this page: https://thewanderingnerd.wordpress.com/2015/04/19/corel-word...
You don't need a mail server to send mail. One can send mails through a VPN as client.
The notcurses project, notcurses.com has some pretty wild demos of what can be done with sixel etc.
I don't really care about ideologies or hypotheticals. I understand the libertarian worldview but I'm more concerned about the real-world effects of policy than their theoretical underpinnings. The outcome of criminalizing abortion is higher mortality rates in childbirth, higher mortality rates of abortion (back-alley abortions), and higher rates of infanticide. Not to mention the destabilizing social effects of millions of unwanted young men entering adulthood:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolae_Ceau%C8%99escu#1966_de...

> I think the federal government does maximal harm anytime it passes any laws.

This is why I don't take libertarians seriously. Do you honestly think that the Civil Rights Act was maximal harm? Or the 1934 Firearms Act? Or the 14th Amendment? What a ridiculous hill to die on.
That isn't the issue. Lobbying the government to strip people of their liberty is.
> I find Word becomes much more manageable if you religiously use styles instead of ad-hoc formatting.

I agree with this tip but it requires very rigorous discipline and is basically impossible to maintain if you're working with any collaborators.
> whether this is sinful or not completely irrelevant to whether it should be illegal

Unless your country has an official religion. Making the sins of that specific religion illegal would not not make sense there.
Because roe made the compromises impossible.
What about gliders? Glider hours are much cheaper. Not sure how their availability looks like in India - but if there are, I imagine there are AMAZING mountain ridges your could use for soaring :)
The reason people in power don't care about design is because good design is hard to quantify and thus hard to justify effort and/or expense.

The results of bad design (i.e. takeoff power from grandparent) are much easier to quantify and therefore easier to use to catalyze improvement.

This is why Apple, under Jobs, was so unique. He helped rebuild the company around design despite the fact that their obsession with design cost them loads of money (in the short term). In the longer term, their products' success has spoken for itself but you can bet that past shareholders/board members were constantly asking "do we need this?"
"The easiest way to support tropical rainforest is to eat less beef. The amazon is cleared for cattle grazing, much of which is imported into America."
I wrote my dissertation in cuneiform in only 9 months, which included time for each clay tablet to dry!
Really? Did you miss the part where both of them are editors?
Computer monitors are not all 60hz, and I cited anime as one example; TV and movies also have jerky playback.

VLC does the behavior described (jerky playback) on both a Mac with 60hz display that is several years old, and on a cutting edge PC that has a refresh rate more than five times the framerate of anime and supports variable refresh rate.

mpv plays anime butter-smooth on both systems.

I love it when I get a supremely condescending explanation that is also wrong.
cutting gemstones has a pretty low capital cost to get started, a couple of workbenches worth of grinding and polishing equipment plus a diamond-saw

there's lots of tutorials on youtube, seems like a gratifying hobby with a potential for profit if you take it seriously as a day job
Except, strangely enough, according to my anecdata, not COVID-19. For nearly 2 years there were, AFAICT, almost no cases of COVID transmission through our nursery. I'd love this to be followed up properly. I have a theory that not only are the kids more resistant, but the parents are too due to the circulation of the other coronaviruses in pre-school children, along with all the other various infections.

It's all changed somewhat with Omicron, but then it has everywhere.
I will write up the 30 years of using MSFT stacks and OS up at some point. That’ll be 100% substance. But the salt will have to remain.

If you want to see the real MSFT check out the dotnet team handling of the customer demands to remove telemetry. This is on GitHub issues. Or was if they haven’t reorganised all the repos again thus backing up the other schizophrenic donkey comment.
There isn't any, but if we take pro-life to its logical conclusion, there should be, at the very least from parents to children, and at least in cases where it doesn't lead to your death.

Also, mandatory organ donation after death should be obvious table stakes for a pro-life person, if they were logically consistent.
There are two ways to change the laws in America, through legislatures and with the courts.

The courts are the most efficient way to repeal something you don’t like. There are hundreds of legislators, you need teams of lobbyists to influence them, and there’s no guarantee that they will take up your issue in their agenda. Furthermore, if you want to change one thing, everything gets thrown on the table as being liable to change. You may win in one area but lose in a lot of others, and sometimes you will lose in non-obvious ways.

The judges don’t want to rock the boat as much as politicians do. If they make a decision that makes precedent, it will be very focused and very specific. But, if you want to take an issue up in the courts, you need to sue, or be sued. Courts are not hypothetical in the way that legislatures are.

I think fair use is a perfectly valid legal defense. Grey area is one way to put it, another way to put it is a legal area lacking precedent. If it were not for fair use, copyright law would violate your right to free speech. Fair use let’s you use copyrighted material for criticism, parody, and education. Covid created a situation where people’s access to works was restricted, with the only reason being legal limitations (copyright law). IA sought to educate people irrespective of the limitation. I don’t know how IAs legal team is planning to defend their client, but fair use would provide a defense. This case could end up with a precedent that says that under exceptional circumstances, the scope of what activities are covered under fair is expanded.
Shipping issues undoubtedly were an issue with Australia.
You could write longform content in Print Shop?
> This way, Israel can plausibly claim to take every position on this issue, all at once, and thereby appease a coalition of about a zillion different views.

I'd like to point out that this hasn't started with Israel per se; the roots are in Jewish tradition, Judaism, and Jewish philosophy. There's rarely a "this is right and that is wrong" situation. The whole Talmud is basically "here's the problem; here's one view; here's an opposing view; now learn both by heart" stuff. Allowing for opposing views to co-exist is rooted deeply in the society, and maybe something worth if not adopting, then at least admiring.
You start with a macro assembler - MASM being an example - which lets you handle many things in a surprisingly high-level manner.
Or we could accept that huge enterprises have a lot of institutional inertia, and real change plays out over a decade+.

Or as the quip goes: culture doesn't change until the previous generation retires or dies.
Of all the detached, disgusting hn libertariantard comments on these topics, this may win for being the most detached.
But the copyright holders own the politicians here, not the non profit.
C# isn't ideal either, but it's a way better java than java. The even better java is Kotlin or Groovy.

My point in the GP comment is just that there fundamental design things that IDEs can't fix. Java is badly designed, IDEs can do damage control, but it can't undo what the mistakes of language designers.
> they have to operate under the same BS everyone else does

As a nonprofit and public archive/library they do have some special rights, which is why this isn't as clear cut as many think. These range from codified in law https://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#108 to US Copyright Office decisions like https://www.copyright.gov/1201/2021/ and precedent.

If you did this you'd be sued into the ground and 100% lose. Now, I'm not saying the Archive will get away with what they did or that it was a good idea, just that there might be some non-obvious avenues.
How many of them are on the Supreme Court?
Musk wants Twitter trial pushed to 2023 so he has time to analyze spam data
Well, there is draft, which (in case of a war) forces people to risk their life and health with much higher risk and for longer time than a pregnancy.

And also there are bans on euthanasia, which just make people suffer for nothing.
I just mean there’s tons of shit books published in every field. Computers probably have 10x more, but it’s not a new phenomenon.

Look at medical books that make it into libraries. Same for psychology or any social science. Tons of history books fall into editorializing so similar can be said of them.

And for technical books, (woodworking, drawing, knitting, sewing, etc) they tend to fall into cycles of fads with books that are basically clones of each other.
I hear this a lot, but even as an atheist I think you're making a bad argument.

Murder is a sin in most (all?) religions. It's also against the law. It's not against the law because it's a sin. It's against the law because it violates another person's rights.

Some people view abortion in the same light. They think you're killing a person and they think that should be illegal.

And, yes, even lots of atheists like me get increasingly uncomfortable with abortions after the first trimester. And it's not because of any religious doctrine.

I think your argument was much better suited for an issue like gay marriage where -- no matter how you look at it -- nobody's rights were being violated, and it was entirely based on religious doctrine and tradition.
And that's really the point. The idea of forced organ donation is abhorrent. The same visceral reaction to the idea of forced organ donation extends to forced birth by way of bodily autonomy. No one, not even the government, should have more authority over your body than you.
I'm 44 years old; and found a article recently that completely transformed my perspective:

FORGET when life begins. It's a red herring. A distraction causing us to diverge rather than agree.

Right now, today, there are countless people needing blood transfusions; but I'm not legally forced to donate my blood to them (I should; it would be great; it would be the right thing to do; but I'm not legally forced to do so).

Right now, today, there are people needing bone marrow or organs; or would like eggs or sperm so they can have a child; or long hair for wigs for cancer-struck; but I'm not legally forced to donate them to these clearly worthy causes.

Lest somebody tries to muddle the issue, I'm also not required to donate blood or organs to my two children, or my sibling, or my spouse; I should, and I likely would, but I'm not legally forced.

.... So even IF we grant that a gamete or zygote or 4 cells or 6 weeks old fetus or whatever are live beings based on whatever definition we agree or fail to agree on; what rational differentiator would cause us to force a woman to donate blood and organs, sacrifice and risk their health for them?

I may have come to this point late, this may be an old perspective to others, but it helped me shortcut a tremendous number of complex and relative arguments, and go back to - "it's a woman's body; where do we get off forcing her to donate it to anybody else?"

At the same time, I must admit I now find it harder to understand and condone the opposing perspective; I see it as forced organ donation for a select subgroup of humanity, and while I'm a moral relativist, that doesn't mean that I don't find some things morally wrong :-/
They very clearly stated that after viability, induced delivery is the course. Just like Casey V. Planned Parenthood originally made viability the cutoff. At any point a woman should be allowed to rescind the right to their body from anyone or anything, a fetus included. Whether that means abortion or delivery depends on viability.

So your straw-man of a 32 week abortion isn't applicable at all.
Yes but why should Apple do that? How would Apple benefit from doing that?
Parents were African immigrants
That is an argument from tradition - which you yourself have brought up, calling Bazel a "standard way".

>The value of bazel is never having to run make clean because artifacts aren't correctly being built from cache.

You can get that with make(1) too, check out FreeBSD's META_MODE for one example. And it didn't require reinventing the wheel.
I'm pretty sure the only real issue with the license is that the license is not clear about what the limits of "this software" are.

My understanding is that the following are your main concerns:
1. Content, including blog posts, talks, and images. You don't really want those reposted, especially if misattributed or altered.
2. I know you really don't want people to come to rely on the software have put out there on the net, especially in any way where you would feel obligated to provide support, notifications about vulnerabilities, etc.

For #1, clarifying that the contents of the `blog`, `gallery`, `talks` and `static` folders (and perhaps `template` too) are not part are not covered by the license, would effectively take care of this. (I also agree that it probably won't stop people from hosting such modified copies, especially if they are using scraping techniques, as opposed to running the code, but at least then it is completely unambiguous that they are violating the license.)

For #2 the existing nonstandard license, and warnings in the readme are probably mostly sufficient to make this clear. Plus honestly overall the code is pretty tailored to you. If I were to try to create a blog based on your code, I'd want to rip out the galley and talk sections, would need to redesign or remove the webmention support (or run a stripped version of the `mi` api), remove the patreon support, remove or modify xe-conv, change the cloud flare ping code, remove signalboost (I'd be too small to meaningfully boost anybody) etc. And all of that on top of creating the content, creating a stylesheet I like, creating new templates, etc.
No, the opposite. I want all the content to enter my brain faster and fully focused.
On the other hand tools on par with SciPy are not common in other languages.
"I felt I was constantly fighting the compiler/borrow checker/whatever. I just want to write some code, dammit"

Well here's your problem. Type safety helps you avoid avoidable bugs. Try Haskell or Scala next.
Handling Pushback on Automation
In the post he mentions that he could use a simple $3/mo Lite VPS (or vms is what he says) for what he needs.... so why go all the way to AWS if you can use something lite? Why are things like DigitalOcean / Linode / Hetzner / OVS etc so discounted? (edit: discounted in terms of opinion, dismissed so easily, not discounted in price. Obviously they are cheaper)
It's interesting to consider that there are books, still in copyright, that were published before any digital computers, let alone software companies, existed.

It puts the extreme absurdity of modern copyright law in context. 20 years is extreme. The modern "standard" is the entire life of the author + 70 years on top. This is indefensible.
Show HN: Puke Planner, organize tasks based on how much they make u want to puke
The key to protecting Yosemite’s sequoias from wildfires? More fire
bicycle tube for making bikes out of chromoly can be bought from many makers. The good stuff doesn't have uniform wall thickness but has thinner sides and thicker top/bottom for lower weight/stiffness. It should also have butted ends, meaning that it has thicker walls at the ends.
Parthenogenesis is uncommon but not impossible in eggs.

We might have record of it happening once for humans in some holy writ, though the baby was considered male, which if genetically male would be impossible for parthenogenesis but not necessarily if the case were simply phenotypically male (like a female hyena). Certainly that story is more common in the US than other similarly derived folklore and myths, like Athena (female, so parthenogenesis is a potential).
>I don't think so. Imagine someone wrote an AI that is able to act exactly like you. To the point that no one you know can differentiate between you and the AI. Would it be OK at that point if they just killed you? No one can tell the difference, right?

Everyone can tell the difference, because there's a dead body. Killing is killing. Doesn't matter that there's another instance living. Also making a clone of me would be a gross violation of my privacy rights. The situation in the previous post - the "transporter" - is different, because I'm agreeing to one of my instances to be killed.

I wonder what would be the legal status of one's own instances ("clones"). I mean, they are all persons, but at the same time they are inherently connected, from DNA to memories.
Well that's part of the quotes from Wikipedia. This comment basically describes a part of the overall results.

My conclusion still stands, China achieved its political goal: Vietnam got contained into its limited sphere of influence.
You know, it's kind of the job of those making the claim to attempt the prototype (and then to demonstrate, publicly, that it works).

It's not the skeptics' job to make the prototype. (And if they did, the true believers could just say "you didn't do it right".) The burden of proof is on you (and, even more, on the authors of the website, if there's any difference). Don't ask your critics to do your job.
There are special rules for archives that might help: https://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#108

Not sure if that's the specific part that lets them do what they do, or if that's from some other rule, just pointing out that this kind of rule exists.
When you become a citizen we give you the right to bear arms because you may have to commit crime to survive here.
That doesn't solve the problem at all, Because you still have to decide if the the fetus get's the right to that same absolute bodily autonomy.

Take that all the way to the extreme though and you would need to wait for the zygote to get to the point that it can give it's opinion on what should be done with it's body. After all letting the mother decide would be going outside the bounds of her own body and would be violating another human beings right to autonomy.

Absolute bodily autonomy doesn't even manage to sidestep the issue.
The history that some, including the justices, are reading is a merge of sinful and illegal. One interpretation of the English common law is that it left abortion to the ecclesiastical courts. To use your words, the equation changes at the quickening (first kick), but I don’t think that was noted in the SC opinion.