skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The WHO and any local health org worth its salt cares. Parents that want the best for their baby do. The more appropriate question is who wants to ignore the medical consensus and why.

Of course some women can’t breastfeed and they deserve support. But downplaying the benefits of breastfeeding because it may hurt the feelings of some mothers is not the way to go.

It’s disappointing but not surprising that you’re saying that mothers need to go to work in the US. AFAIK in many parts of Europe they take many months off (often 6-12) to spend time with the baby. For some of them, it’s the only time in their life that they’ll get the chance to do that. Work can wait.

Why do mothers need to work in the US in the first 6 months of their baby’s life? Why can’t one of the richest countries in the world pay them to stay at home?
What's at 0x050f? Looks like they set the rip register to that value.
Wouldn't this technically be a suicide? The process calls exit itself, after all.
You mean exploitation, right?
Democracy pretty reliably leads to persecution of religious minorities. I’m not aware of any exceptions in the Muslim world but the pattern held in early modern Europe too. Greater popular involvement in government meant the ruling class couldn’t protect useful but unpopular minorities. Thus everyone who isn’t Sunni supporting Assad in Syria. They know that the good outcome of the US winning is getting out alive. Or see the treatment of the Rohingya in Burma or Tamils in Sri Lanka. Absent a commitment to liberalism that requires generations of propaganda work national self-determination is bad news for religious or ethnic minorities.
True, and thermal mass is amazing if you have a lot of giant rocks and use them to soak up sun and keep fruit trees warm at night, allowing you to grow fruits normally suited to much warmer climates.

My experience was mostly old brick buildings in Dublin (old enough to not be cavity wall) and having all the heat they soaked up during the day radiated back at you at night.

I plan to add retractable awnings over the windows that get a lot of sun at some point too; they can make a big difference.

And, of course, trees! Deciduous trees give you shade in the summer and kindly drop their leaves so you have light in the winter. They're amazing!
Get a USB audio interface, increase sample rate, and decrease buffer size in the device settings. This has completely eliminated VoIP latency on my system as long as I’m calling people that use Ethernet instead of Wi-Fi.

On Linux you’ll also have to mess with pulseaudio settings, but that’s all you need on Windows.

In theory a motherboard mic input could offer the same settings, but they (correctly) assume most users have a shitty CPU that can’t handle real time tasks without lag spikes that lead to buffer underruns.
ARM Windows builds run fine on Apple Silicon via Parallels. Windows also has a built-in x86 translation layer, so it is able to run most programs.
Definitely not what happened in Australia! But lockdowns and travel restrictions here were much stricter.
We're dealing with earthly matters, here, not heavenly ones. God may be in charge in the metaphysical sense, but particular individuals are in charge in the physical sense.

Heads of churches, pastors, the pope, directors of Christian schools, all sound to me like Christian leaders. They all have an incredible amount of influence over the laymen.

Many of them have been, and continue to be actively involved in bringing us to the current state of affairs. Many others are deafeningly silent on the matter. Some of that silence is principled (in the apolitical sense), but much of it is also opportunistic.
True, I think I'm just a little grumpy from years of boiling hot apartments in very old buildings.
I think we focus a lot on procrastination and less on a severe and widely experienced social illness, of being controlled by others. How often are we ordered to do something by another person in our communities that we can't readily disobey, how easy is it for any of us to choose to relocate to another community, how much of the value you can generate is taken from you. Living this way strips our agency and limits/devalues our individual capability for vision.

Adapting to this and considering it normal is bound to lead to other issues that we end up blaming ourselves for, because it is possible to cope and do better within the framework so it feels that any lack of progress there is an individualized failure
Asking Google to collect less data is like asking a hog to eat less. Not gonna happen.
You seriously need to read the wikipedia article about this mass-murder.

How the Ukrainian government conducted the investigation is quite telling.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Odessa_clashes#Investigat...
> Google provides useful products, and in exchange we might be targeted with annoying ads. Big whoop. Until now.

Enter a cage willingly, with barely any complaint, for minor convenience, then cry when you're taken to the slaughterhouse. It's sad that despite all the warnings, people are so myopic and apathetic that it takes something this big and obvious to make them react.

And despite this, they remain willfully blind to other threats, that are smart enough to stay below the threshold: https://caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/censorship-by-algori...

> Four ways to build civil rights into Google products

A laughable chapter of the article, void of any actually effective suggestions, such as compelling Google properties to stop blocking the Tor network (duckduckgo and yandex allow Tor), or using free software that is actually under the user's control.

The problem is that would give users actual power and autonomy. But what the authors really want is for Google and other corporations to keep acting as internet police, but only enforcing rules they agree with, and not any others. That's why they want to build "civil rights" into products, and not "user freedom". That's why they get comments from an establishment Harvard professor, and not the FSF.
Woodpeckers don't have built-in shock absorbers to protect their brain
First time I heard FFT was involved in multiplication I was as shocked as excited.
The kind of suicide where you fall on a knife, several times...
It seems more reasonable solutions already exist, like not logging in to Google when doing searches you want to keep anonymous. Google probably still logs stuff (IP, user agent, and search term) but it gives you plausible deniability and you have the option of using a public WiFi or VPN if you don't want your IP address logged. Or more simply, just use DuckDuckGo instead.
Well, it's "just expensive" because most developed countries happen to develop the same stupid incentives for making housing difficult. Even if you exclude everything that's health, safety and environment.
Don't hesitate to involve a lawyer in these cases as soon as possible. Collect all the evidence you can. If needed, chat with them more to collect evenmore evidence.
I generally agree (love my class D amp).

Low power is another niche where analog can be best. Did you know that even current smartphone designs include electromechanical (really) filters for radio signals? SAW filters convert electrical oscillations to mechanical ones and back.

AFAIK hearing aids also rely on analog stages in some pretty clever ways to save energy.
> when seconds count, the police are an hour away

I can potentially see this in rural areas. Not so much in urban areas, where the police are much nearer and it seems that the guns are the main conveyer of harm.

I don't think you can ignore that they are also used in offence, not just defence. I live in the UK and I don't need a gun to defend myself, because any attacker is extremely unlikely to have one either (because the penalty for even being found carrying one is so severe that it's not worth the risk for them). One of the best ways in which a government can protect its' citizens from each other is removing dangerous weapons from their possession!

I guess my question is: what are you scared of? To my mind the most likely thing to be a victim of is burglary, in which case isn't it much better to just let the robbery take place (and then claim on insurance) while being safe and unharmed than to risk being shot in an armed conflict? Seems to me you make yourself less safe not safer by bringing guns into the equation.
> The westener who defends such rule are racists unable to grant the oriental people the right to live and organize in a manner of their choosing.

Now, now, some hold democracy in contempt generally, not just for foreigners. Others believe that people have a right to live and organise in a manner of their choosing, not that they must be governed in a manner pleasing to Westerners.
This. People blame it on social media. But it’s the people not the media they use.

I grew up way before the internet. Children on my Highschool were really mean. Many, many bullies were around. Pretty girls talking bad about less pretty girls. And much more.

The big difference: we now see it on a different scale and start talking more about it. But the people haven’t changed.
That's the syscall instruction (0f 05).

It's not jumping to that address, it's injecting the exit syscall right under the instruction pointer.
If you wanted to modify the register, you'd do `set $rip = 0x050f` without the `{short}`
If-let chains have been stabilized in Rust 1.64
epstein.sh
I've been working my way through MIT 6.824 Distributed Systems on YouTube (https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrw6a1wE39_tb2fErI4-WkMbs...)

It's a great survey of the basic principles and I've already found it useful in some projects I've been working on.
There are cots which attach to the parent’s bed and special blouses which allow for easy breastfeeding without undressing.

The whole process is as simple as dragging the baby over, taking one breast out and bringing them near to it. The baby will take care of the rest.

Mothers do get sleep, including during the day together with the baby. There are solutions out there for many frequent or rare problems. A good midwife and experienced mothers in the family / circle of friends are priceless.
> Your trust is misplaced.

This way of approaching the topic feels unhealthy to me. I’d put less focus on “don’t trust your kids”, and more on “make sure your kids have a responsible adult they trust”.
I can understand your view on it. My hope is to broaden your understanding of what Christian means so that you might ultimately say "so-called Christians".

The difficulty in your argument is you are suggesting that those who are NOT like these so-called Christians who are extreme and incendiary, be LIKE those and oppose/crush their efforts.

As we say in America, it's a free country. There is freedom of speech and it is the responsibility of the listener to work to make sure they are not being duped. Assuming you are a thinking person, allow me to share my view more.

I am a Christ-follower. I follow Christ. I don't follow Christians, organizations or politicians. A life of following Christ is a life of submission to Christ. I therefore will not be expected to do something contrary to what he has said to do. He has said to love my enemies and do good to those who persecute me or give him a bad name. I have been told to expect that there will be those who pretend to be real Christians but are not and are only doing things for their selfish gain. I have been told to expect that there will be times when I am criticized or ridiculed for simply identifying as a Christian.

So, as a Christian, I understand your point of view of them, but you might be misunderstanding me.
Every child is different. As parent only you can make the right decision in context. We select and watch film together unless its clearly kids content. Personally I do not encourage spending. Money is a vile thing.
For 40 years I've been thinking of this question as technical, in
terms of signals and noise, error correction, theoretical limits of
precision and so on.

Now I think those are the wrong questions.

Digital versus analogue, if we approach it as a "conflict" is
political, connected to human rights and values around experience,
ownership, reproducibility and uniqueness, time, space and reality, and
the ephemeral versus the eternal.

What would the world be like if we could re-run history and develop
analogue technologies on a capability par with our digital ones? Is it
unimaginable that picometer scale manufacture, DNA bio-computing and
quantum technologies might evolve out of a totally different
trajectory than Boolean logic gates, von Neumann/Harvard architectures
and packet networks?

In such a world, would we still have conceits like Digital Rights
Management or massive centralisation into single points of power and
potential failure?

Would we feel as alienated by/from our technology and need an expert
guardian class to manage the masses? Or would powerful analogue
computers somehow fee more natural to our analogue brains? More
understandable and maintainable by the average person? Would they be
mass-producible or remain powerful tools for the few?

Would we still rush around like headless chickens, worrying about
nanoseconds of efficiency and trying to connect everything to
everything else just because we can?

Perhaps we would have entirely different problems such as virus-like
nanobots that reprogram people or computers that forget important
things. Maybe we would have already achieved "artificial intelligence".
The bypass is so significant that I kind of wouldn't bother. To me I think that it's probably best to just assume that this tpe of sandboxing is not capable of resisting an attacker with code execution, which is fine. It could instead be for things like path traversal attacks in web servers, or other design flaws that would allow "tricking" the application into performing actions you don't want.

I mean it's probably a good idea to close the trivial version of the bypass by disallowing setting exec on files (although you need to check the path because you may want to set it on a directory), but if you can execute `chmod`, write to the i-node directly, write to any other executable, write to your own executable, etc, that's just a full bypass.
> the risk of them transferring them to an Islamic fundamentalist trying to rid the middle east of Jews is nonzero

You’re describing an undeterrable actor.
Has anyone come across a decent summary service? Asking for a friend.
PMC is pretty much exclusively bourgeoisie and petit bourgeoisie.

The exercise of control over capital/means of production (what defines PMC) isnt exactly the same thing as ownership but it's closer to that than only being able to offer labor.

It's not uncommon for it to be better. PMCs (e.g. C level execs) of major corporations a often make out better than shareholders.
"impossible", "always"

These predictions do not tend to age well. I am not an aerospace engineer, but Starship seems to be fairly hopeful.

Already Falcon 9 shows that you do not need to fully disassemble engines etc. to be sure that they are OK. A static fire with enough sensors will do, and nowadays they don't even do that.

If you look at the table of booster reuses of Falcon 9, failures happen, but they are infrequent.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Falcon_9_first-stage_b...
I worked with a company that used the New Micros 68HC11s with embedded Forth. Used it to control CD players using IR codes, to play canned messages for museum exhibits. Lots of fun.
Nono, it calls `exit(0)` only once. :)

(I love the cell block tango)
First base is hooking up, second base is talking, third base is going on a date
I wouldn't call sshd a broker, at least, it's not exclusively one.
Wouldn't just "p exit(0)" do the same, just with gdb doing the heavy lifting?
A DAC is a sampler that sends digital audio to your computer. ASIO bypasses the operating system audio driver. The signal chain is that simple. I'm not sure what you mean.
It depends on the bee species, e.g. Bumblebee queens only live for one season.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy-lift_ship

Though they tend to be quite wide, a custom barge is another option.
Brew won't update it to 2.0, any suggestions?
No significant number of people have died or suffered permanent harm from taking any covid vaccine that I'm aware of. Yes certain countries have at various times suspended distribution - the best explanation was concern that if any of these vaccines did end up killing people, it would destroy public trust to the point vaccination uptake would be massively reduced. But those very same vaccines are still being administered to 100s of millions of people. I think we'd know by now if they really were harmful.
Do the big state-owned banks not have any exposure to high-risk banks or real estate developers?
And order of magnitude or two better, probably.
not if the program is statically linked and stripped.
I don't understand how "the leader of all progressive countries" could fall back into the dark ages by taking away rights that make sense.
A country where consuming cannabis is not outlawed but abortion is.
What is wrong and how can that country be put back on track?
EU Commission: Joint Statement Supporting Ukraine at the International Court
that terraria clone is fantastic
I happen to disagree with this. The only real Christian leaders are those who are following Christ. In all authority, authority is granted. Leadership is essential, and Christians are warned to be on the lookout for wolves among the sheep.

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Acts%2020%3A28%...
Grab the rope. Took me a while too.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_theft
End minority rule. Abolish the Senate and the Electoral College.
> Unless they can fire before the nukes hit they're not useful

Surely hitting every ICBM silo, B-2 airfield and nuclear submarine virtually simultaneously is nontrivial.
As a variation on that theme, sometimes the reason I don't want to do it is because I don't actually know how to do it, or even what to do. While telling myself it should be easy.

Then when I rephrase it as "I have to make this clearer first", or "what's a first step to learn how to do this" or so, I stop procrastinating.
> We

We who?
Most of the people enjoy them and spend on them a large part of their time. They don’t want to give up.
Logo and Learning (2015)
If you read the article I linked to, you'd find an explanation that perfectly matches your preconcieved biases.

It calls it out in bullet points right at the top:

> [We] detail how an outdated regulatory framework is one of the only reasons why uncompetitive coal power continues to operate in the US

What you appear to be assuming is that there is perfect competition in energy markets and that some upstart with solar could outcompete the incumbents if it was really cheaper and so force them to adjust to market prices.

This is not the case.

On top of that, there's also externalities. But even without counting those, there's money being wasted.
Ok everyone that’s enough I think it’s already dead!
I built this simple app to convert kindle notes into markdown https://github.com/Woile/kindle-notes-parser and split per book.

Then I move those files to my second brain and then I create flashcards from some of these books notes.
I feel like the Kindle notes become more useful this way, before those notes were just forgotten in a txt inside the Kindle haha
> Humanoids went millions of years without airplanes.

for clarity: I'm not opposing to the idea that we could survive without planes or any other post industrial comfort.

But perhaps embedding thermometers in the asphalt of an airport track it's not the smartest of the moves if you want to reliably measure changes in temperature over time.

I believe people give themselves too much credit: politics, planes, cars, it doesn't matter, it's not the people that will solve the climate crisis, but how well the system as a whole is going to adapt.

I can do whatever I want, but it's factually (not cynically, it is what it is) completely useless when all the population of my country put together represent 2% of India+China population.

It's like trying to fix high blood pressure when only the thumb is following doctor's orders.
This sounds a little like the incremental addiction to fossil fuels the world has developed. It's "the market" and "blame consumers" when we know damn well that consumers don't choose fuel sources and consumers didn't grease the palms of legislators and regulators for more than a century.
I don't think that this analysis is correct. There is a misunderstanding as the author confuse his situation of 'very tiny' stockholder holder with the global situation of the stock market.

As in real life, if you own one millionth of something, your voice will mean nothing.

But big shareholders have power. At any time they can summon an extraordinary meeting to revoke the directors or even force the company to go in a certain direction. They also decide if they will give/let income/capital funds in the company for investment or to take it all. Reducing the company capacity to expand.

As a small shareholder, you can group with other small shareholders to form a group with a critical mass of voting power.

Also, if small shareholders don't believe in the company and sell, the price of the share will go down, that will impact the valuation for big one also, that could use their power for change is the situation goes too bad
Forth is great fun to play around with. I love the way you can extend the language to create new constructs. They're like Lisp macros with the safety catch off. I found it difficult to reason about how immediate words will be executed and embed code the way I want it to.

In the hands of an expert, Forth can look like a Haiku. For anyone else: not so much (to put it politely). In the end, I just want a solid programming language like C.

Forth advocates can also sound a bit mystical in their utterances, and how they need only 1% of the code of everyone else. They're like Zen riddles: universal truths that no-one really understands. Um, OK, they're undoubtedly right from their point of view, but I doubt that the developers of the Linux kernel wrote 99% of the code for no real reason.

I played with colorforth a couple of times, but could never figure out what the living fark was going on. Sure, it works for Charles Moore, but I'm not Charles Moore. I did see a guy on YT that actually used colorforth. He seemed really happy and productive with it, although I couldn't help but walk away with the sense that it was a bit of a mystery to him too.

I don't think that Forth is that great for microcontrollers either. C's model of edit-compile-upload gets the job done.

I think that the difference between Forth and conventional languages is this: you can write specific solutions to specific problems in Forth, whereas conventional languages are better at generality and scale. Each has their place, but the reason you'll see more of the general-purpose language artefacts is because, well, they're more general-purpose.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220716093810/https://www.indep...
Gonna agree with the other replies. That’s definitely not the case for music production. We even use special drivers on some OSs, bypassing the slow paths, and we’re very particular about gain structuring, signal path and everything around our ADCs/DACs, so there’s not much mystery for us there. We’re in control and it’s as perfect as it gets.
I've kind of always known about Forth, having had a Jupiter Ace when I was about 9, and many many years later I ported a version for the 6809 across to the Ensoniq Mirage sampler to let me poke at the hardware as an aid to disassembling the software.

http://gordonjcp.github.io/miragetools/index.html
What would the motive be to make a fake research paper? We should compare that of the motive partisan government leaders have to force lockdowns.