skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Homeopathy is based on the belief that the body is able to restore itself to health when given the right natural tools. This practice believes that any disease is not a sign that you are unhealthy but rather that your body is fighting to get itself to a balanced position.

In order for this to be achieved, homeopaths prepare homeopathic remedies which are designed to challenge the body’s defense mechanisms in order to stimulate the body’s ability to self heal.
That's the personalization angle. A lot of effort's being expended on transfer learning + training at the edge, where you start with a general model trained on humanity and then it gradually learns about the specific human(s) it's interacting with.
Are you joking? Poor people are the exploitative ones? That's just entirely false

The entire basis of capitalism in the US is that the work of the poor is exploited by those with the capital to build factories and businesses which extract labor and resources from the poor people

That's why they can't invest. You have it entirely backwards
Did you ever risk taking the same airline again?
I have used MMBasic on a Colour Maximite, and it is amazing and fun. Thank you Geoff!
This is not strict aliasing as far as I understand. Strict aliasing is about inference of distinctness of pointers. The case here is that an invalidly typed pointer is created (a bool pointer pointing to where there is no bool). Not sure what this situation is called in standardese.
Bullshit.

Vienna hasn't seized those properties, they just invested and built them themselves. NYC could to the same.
Yes they did paid. Yes some passed, but it was very small percent .
It does sound truly odd. He seems confused about the concept of giving flowers. The actual flowers are not the point.
> One of the original goals of Unicode was to be able to computerize every document. I still have some old linguistics books in which characters have been handwritten into typed or even typeset text.

That's a weird goal for Unicode to have. We've already accomplished that; a PDF file does the job better (note: PDF documents already support every character existing in the past, present, or future!) while being less complex.
> It’s no secret that Unity is painful to use: it’s slow to open, and it often pauses to re-scan the entire project while you’re trying to work

Is this actually true? I always figured Unity's selling point was being lighter and easier to use than unreal.

Godot looks like Unity from 2008, it's easy to boast efficiency when you have a limited product.
> A British YouTuber named Jay Swingler performed a dangerous stunt about a year ago. He placed a plastic bag with a breathing tube over his head, then “glued” his head to the inside of a microwave oven with expanding plaster. The plaster set, and Swingler couldn’t get his head out of the microwave. It took a team of paramedics to set him free.

Wow.
I don't personally think it was malice. More a part of the stream of form over function decisions that lead to losing the ports, the years-long keyboard debacle, stagelight display failures, etc.
I generally avoid slipping in overt promotion of my book [1], but this cries out for it. Find out how it really went down, what the debates were like, and what it was like to be there.

This is a quickie, copy-and-paste job from publicly available sources. Mostly accurate, except for calling the Alto keyset "the Alto keyboard." As some of the comments point out, it's quite incomplete.

[1] https://www.albertcory.io/inventing-the-future
> and not when the console was still in production?

The "Atari 8-bit" refers to a line of 6502 based personal computers manufactured from 1979 until 1992! There was a commercially unsuccessful video game console, the 5200, derived from this general architecture - it's wild that for their illustrious place in video game history, Atari was a one hit wonder - they never really succeeded in a console release after the 2600.

Atari also had a line of 68k based 32/16 bit computers that sadly also discontinued in 1992 so that Atari could focus on their pathetic attempts to break back into the console market.
> QoS is all about discriminating based on traffic source/dest/port

"Source" as in "Netflix", not "part of network with saturated bandwidth". Though discrimination based on port is content-based discrimination, isn't it? Packets headed to port X don't burden the network any more than those to port Y, and this is an easy way to discriminate against applications that use certain ports.
Sure that’s the capitalist narrative explanation. The actual, human, explanation is that landlords see that they can get away with charging absurd rates because consumers are willing to make dumb decisions to get what they want, so they do it.

I’m sick of these economic abstractions that constantly try to explain away our problems, and take away the responsibility from the human actors that cause these effects. It’s not some abstract “supply and demand” that we should focus on—it is the landlords and renters and their decisions that are to blame. We need to introduce some agency and accountability back into our discussions of economics otherwise capitalism will continue to be an abstract machine in which horribly unethical actions are justified by removing human actors and human culpability from the equation. Belief in “the market” is not dissimilar to religious belief. Furthermore, analyses in capitalist terms often lead us to more problems. If the problem is “supply”, people will say “ok build more homes”, but that first of all never seems to actually work and secondly has a large number of additional negative effects such as increasing overcrowding and climate problems.This ridiculous tendency to not actually blame the people responsible for these negative conditions is ridiculous. It’s a large part of the reason we’re in this mess.
This will make Volkswagen completely dependent on China given they control most of the Lithium battery supply chain. [1]

So in essence whether US/EU thinks of Green Energy or Fossil fuel sustainable way for the companies to thrive is to include Russia or China.

Given the current geo-political turmoil, may be its a good thing less chances of conflict and willingness to resolve through dialogue.

[1] https://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/renewable/china-d...
With 4.0 getting more and more advanced features [0] and Unity merging with an Ad company [1], Godot is looking like it could be an attractive proposition for a lot of Unity shops.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32003065

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32081051
Ah yes let’s go to each other’s massive meta verse homes (we all really live in those cell room apartments) to view NFT galleries.
I was also reminded of Matthew 6, but I thought of the first 4 verses

“Be careful not to practice your righteousness in front of others to be seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven. So when you give to the needy, do not announce it with trumpets, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be honored by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you."
Yea, and they're disagreeing. What are you trying to say?
EU Proposes to Screen Your Personal Messages
It's probably a pretty safe assumption that she would be comfortable with it being removed, considering her feedback.

Particularly considering his current caption for the video remains "A beautiful gesture - little big moments".
> The solution is always, always, having (building) more supply than the demand, yet nobody seems to get it.

It is easy to hand wave "more building supply", but that's a medium to long term solution. What do we do in the short term?

Are we supposed to just allow landlords to hike people's rent anywhere between 10-40% year-over-year forcing them to be displaced?

There needs to be some middle ground.
Kind of fun, but my attempt to save the planet failed.
Except the distinction is you were describing intent and not the event. The event can be framed as a factual description, but the intent cannot unless you somehow have unique insight into the person's mind. You can infer intent in this situation, but you can't really claim it as an objective fact.

That's not to mention that the two (action to create a viral video and the intent to truly act out of kindness) don't have to be mutually exclusive. For example, if I did the same to create a viral video with the intent to shape social norms, that would probably be a more moral decision than to create a viral video for monetary gain.
From my understanding, yes.
My two cents : I believe that if you increase supply and allow more affordable housing in a city, it will only marginally decrease prices but will mainly attract more people to this city.

I think the solution to housing cost is to make smaller cities, towns and the countryside more attractive by having higher local tax rates in cities. This source of income could be used to build better infrastructure in the rest of the country.
Magic links improve security on a couple of fronts. For one, they prevent users from making weak passwords, which let's face it, most people likely fall into this category. One could argue that strong password requirements do the same, but in reality they compel many users to reuse the same "strong" password, weakening security overall. Magic links prevent this entirely. Secondly, they protect users from weak auth implementations, leaked password hashes, passwords stolen through brute force attacks, etc. Because there are no passwords.

I don't have much of a security argument against magic links. I suppose an attacker that gets access to your email now automatically has access to the application. But frankly that is true for passworded apps as well, given the "forgot my password" workflows out there.
The Scoop #18: Big Tech Joins the Tech Cooldown
Also thought about posting that this morning, but wasn't sure anyone else would get the reference. (As context for everyone else, some kook blew up some of the guidestones last week in the middle of the night)
I always have interesting discussions during job interviews when I answer the old "where do you see yourself in five years" or when discussing my non-linear/standard career path. I'm a bit of a fan of Mintzberg's view on strategy when it comes to career "planning" and technology companies (I'd recommend his book "Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning"). He uses a garden metaphor and basically says let everything grow and trim the weeds and his reasoning for this "dabble in different things" approach is that in a turbulent world, precise planning is not really feasible. It's basically more of a core competencies approach.

Different situations require different approaches. There's also value in planning and tight operational execution in different domains. For tech...I feel like some overall "vision" and rough "roadmap" are good and then try different things and be quick to market with new ideas and willing to adapt.
> It also turns the subject into an object of utility, a means and not and end in themself.

False dichotomy. It can be both.
Property owners providing almost no value is just factually wrong. Their function is similar to insurance. You pay rent to live somewhere because you don't want to take the risk or can't get the loans to buy a property yourself. And it costs real money and time (i.e. real resources) to build those homes and maintain them.

In return property owners (or insurance runners) can get rich off your monthly payments as well as the inherent value of the property (/insurance company), but because of risk of ruin, opportunity cost for other investments and other related phenomena, it can mathematically be a total win-win for both sides.

What everyone complaining about property prices also always seems to forgoe are two things: First, people are clearly able to afford them or the prices wouldn't go higher. The myth that property investors buy homes on mass and don't rent them out which supposedly creates this pricing hike is idiotic. All of these big cities with insane rents have very low vacancy rates compared to the national average.

In almost all of these places where people complain about rent, we are talking about big popular places where everyone wants to go even though there are tons of realistic alternatives all around the country. The situations where it's economically totally necessary for you to move to an expensive place but at the same time you can't afford the rent is so rare as to be virtually non-existent.

Even the idea that people are displaced from their homes is an issue on a smaller scale than people make it out to be. That's because income in those expensive places is much higher than in cheaper places. There are people displaced from their homes, but that's because of poverty and other aspects of gentrification that are not necessarily tied to rent.
Kinda hard to look up when someone misspells the word.
Rent control only helps people who already have a home and want to stay there forever. Everyone else loses because there are few vacancies. This means less job mobility, more difficulty recovering after being evicted, and less development, which further exacerbates the rent problem.

> 100% of this price hike is going into landlord's pockets

This is true, and the solution to this is a land-value-tax and to use that to offset the city's sales tax, which disproportionately impacts the poor. Hell, it would probably be enough if the city just assessed property taxes more accurately. My TL was bragging about his home being assessed at $800k, when it's easily worth $2M.
Lol just tax land
> Do you extend the same reasoning to fiat?

I was asking about fiat because many of your criticisms equally apply to fiat.

> No. The question is: what does the trustless blockchain offer when you still have to rely on a centralised trusted entity.

I answered that multiple times already.

> Which immediately means that whoever got in early and got the first initial supply is at great advantage compared to anyone who got in later. For example compared to any people born 20 years from now.

That's, unfortunately, the case for almost anything of value.

> Could. Maybe. Should. Perhaps. That's all you can ever hear from crypto proponents.

I'm not sure I would consider myself a crypto proponent, I was trying my best to answer your questions as objectively as possible.

But it seems you are very emotionally invested in this for some reason... Did you have a bad experience with crypto?
This comment is not quite accurate. He was known by some collectors but did not make any money from his art and generally considered a failure.
They had made previous ‘commitments’ to Wall St that they had a way to circumvent Apple Tracking Transparency by using ML to do the tracking without all the device information. It didn’t work, and their stock tanked when they announced it in quarterly results.

This _seems_ like an attempt to shore up that part of the business.

Speculation:
They know the returns from the game engine/vr-ar future will take a long time to arrive. So they need — given they’re a publicly traded company - to ‘show them the money’, and they fell down the ‘ads!’ hole, and I’m not sure they’ll get out of it.
Even then it's not true altruism because you're doing it because you know it to be right and you (selfishly?) want to be the kind of person who does the right thing.

I don't think it's possible for apes who evolved and outcompeted other apes in the endeavor to become the dominant species on a planet to be truly altruistic. At least not without a lot more cultural, social, and possibly biological evolution, if ever.

Doesn't matter though. What difference does it make how "true" one's altruism is?
And the person I'm replying to, in the order of their statements and questions, first assumes that it is a bold claim and after that decides they don't understand the statement they're replying to. It's backwards
Jony would design cabinets so slim that one can put only single knife lengthwise in a drawer.
AI image generation: more creative control
Blog post: https://ai.facebook.com/blog/greater-creative-control-for-ai...

Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.13131

Meta AI's tweet: https://twitter.com/MetaAI/status/1547598454922153985?s=20&t...
> order food online

Just one of the reasons I only order in place. More on topic: it takes a certain profile to build baroque systems. Even more: process solidity is a value, and simplicity is both a value and something that also derives from the former.

> between technology and process you can't trust it

If I could tell you the relevant shock I received only a handful of hours ago, dealing with a service provider... I'll respectfully "fix" yours: "between technology, and process, and human processors you can't trust it". The situation is worsening because the attempt which some called "anglosaxon school of management", of depreciating the human participation in enterprises as a mere "biological workflow executor", "define it as if a fool should follow it", is - as one could guess and as some can see - a blow to the awareness and presence of common sense.

Which does not promise quality for forthcoming service provision. Concern which should be part of the planning (minimization of damage potential, especially if outside the windows the clouds are heavy).
Something like the letters V and U.
So far.

No death tallies from the accident will be complete until the products have decayed to background levels.

I think this study will take sometime to complete.
The Journey Behind TweepsBook – A Twitter Bookmarking Tool
How do you get so far into a project before you even realize that you have such a show-stopper problem? Move fast / fail fast works with software because iteration times are quick and penalty per iteration is low. But just building stuff and hoping it works and then realizing major problems doesn't work so well with real-world stuff. Couldn't they have "workshopped" this with non-functional item to see what the real world roadblocks would have been before a deep investment?

This is especially the case in high-risk unproven areas such as cleantech where the solution space is vast and potential problem areas significant. Any problem area can kill a project, so why are we progressing so fast to build first?
The type aliasing rule is also known as the strict aliasing rule, see for example: https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/language/object
Nitpicking, but he lies right off-the-bat:

"Yeah. And the presumption is that I wouldn’t be able to stay on budget, which is the opposite of the truth. Every one of our buildings hits the budget."

MIT Stata Center was budgeted at $100M. It was well over 4x that cost before it was even finished (http://archive.boston.com/news/globe/living/articles/2003/09...). The costs went up from there, as when it rained outside, it also rained inside, and there were all sorts of other unforeseen problems. There were litigation, which Gehry shrugged off.

The inside of the building was a train wreck. You had walls at odd angle, where you couldn't fit a standard bookcase or file cabinet. The acoustics meant that you could hear conversations as far as a different floor. All the issues to make it a practical place to work still haven't been addressed.

But as much as it sucks as a place to work, it's a great monument to faculty and administrator egos.
> Nowadays Snapchat is not only available on mobile; there is a web client.

This isn't true.
yeah it’s hard! I finally won after a couple tries, you have to move fast at the beginning or it gets way harder to keep everyone happy.
An open-source implementation of the CvT: Introducing Convolutions to Vision Transformers research paper in Google's JAX and Flax.

JAX/Flax Repository: https://github.com/conceptofmind/CvT-flax

CvT Research Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.15808

Official Github Repository: https://github.com/microsoft/CvT

In collaboration with Dr. Phil 'Lucid' Wang: https://github.com/lucidrains.
Thanks, I've been making way too many typos lately! :)
I'm no NIMBY but places like NYC will never be able to build enough to outpace demand.
Google is currently doing a proactive system called "Nest Renew"[1]. This system is more focused on using clean energy vs. dirty energy - at least for me (where there is no rate difference based on time)

[1]: https://nestrenew.google.com/
Yep, and with pictographic writing systems it's a lot more common than latin... but even here we have X Æ A-12 Musk, and Prince's name symbol.

Heck, my initials are totally non-standard.
You might be interested in following the Forge Federation project
https://forgefriends.org/blog/2022/06/30/2022-06-state-forge...
I wouldn't, though, because they don't have the impact on the population at large and don't cost nearly as much. Yes, maybe they impact other industries or recreation in an area for awhile.
There’s plenty of land in nyc. There are areas of Manhattan that are entirely sub-5 story buildings. There are areas of queens that are mostly low density warehouses. Long Island City, which is more or less 2 stops on the train out of Manhattan, is extremely sparse.
You act like hotels, inns, and short term stay apartment hotels will suddenly disappear if Airbnb is cracked down on but to answer your question yes, people who live in the city should be prioritized over people who want to come over for a quick stay.
Wright had the same kinds of problems, right?
I believe its predecessor, the 8, did. I can't say for certain that the 9 will but it seems like a (relatively) safe bet.
Check out ACMI in Fed Square.
They have a section of the "story of the moving image" exhibition on the evolution of video games (https://www.acmi.net.au/story-of-the-moving-image/videogames...).

AFAIR it's not exactly "consoles in display cases" like at powerhouse, but they probably don't have the kit
Depending on your ide (e.g. Rider) you can get it directly in the IDE with no setup other than installing the plug-in.

You can always execute via the binary.

https://docs.godotengine.org/en/stable/tutorials/editor/comm...
[1]> NYCHA has approximately 13,000 employees serving about 173,946 families and approximately 392,259 authorized residents. Based on the 2010 census, NYCHA's Public Housing represents 8.2% of the city's rental apartments and is home to 4.9% of the city's population. NYCHA residents and Section 8 voucher holders combined occupy 12.4% of the city's rental apartments.

1 out of 20 of the city's residents, 1 in 8 if you count voucher programs. That's far from nothing, but you're right, there's definitely room for improvement if you can cut through the red tape of nimbyism and corruption.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City_Housing_Authorit...
Housing is part of CPI. If rents rise then the CPI will rise too, all else being equal.

https://www.bls.gov/cpi/factsheets/owners-equivalent-rent-an...
Must be fun spending the whole day looking for technicalities to address.
I don’t understand. If there is no computerized way to represent the script, all you can do would be to include photographs in your pdf. The point of computerization is not simply storage and retrieval (and retrieval is hard if you can’t represent the script) but automated processing, which is meaningless if you can’t represent any semantics).

Separately, PDF felt like a step backwards on the day it was announced and sadly nothing since then has changed that.
Not to Le Corbusier?
<fieldset> with radio buttons.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/fi...
Thundering herd, but for thermostats. A little randomization of the default setting would go a long way to smoothing out the spike.
Yes, but all accidents (not just nuclear) seem to have simple, stupid, easily-avoided factors in retrospect.

I know it's tempting to say "oh, if we just don't do these 4-5 dumb things-- the risk is gone".

It's s small risk, but boy the end of the tail in what it costs is pretty dang high.
Not at the current price point.