skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Of course. I'm just saying, it's a banal point to make, and certainly not one that will produce a useful, interesting, or curious conversation.

15 seconds later

(I'll admit: I didn't even notice until just now that it was you who'd made the parent comment, and I feel maybe a little bad about the tone I took. But I'm still right!)
Why does this application send these requests over HTTP?

For example:

def getPasswords(self):
"""Func which get all password from server"""
# Create requests for getting passwords
self.header.loadingIndicator.setHidden(False)
self.header.spinner.start()
request = QNetworkRequest(QUrl("http://217.28.228.66:8000/api/get_passwords"))
data, signature = generate_verification()
self.getNetworkManager.sendCustomRequest(
request,
QByteArray("GET".encode("utf-8")),
QByteArray(json.dumps({
"public_key": pub_key_string,
"verification_string": data,
"signature": signature
}).encode("utf-8"))
)

I'm all for student projects but this is security basics 101. A simple replay attack would let someone wipe out any sniffed passwords because of how the deletion logic appears to work.
I want to read one of his books. What is your recommendation for a book lover (although a casual sci-fi reader at best)
Apple was originally an arts-based company, and much more concerned with design over engineering.

As for what Jony Ive came up with, his Wikipedia page has a lot of detail: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jony_Ive
It definitely asks for permission, and only prompts mutual contacts to begin with, as far as I know.
When I was on the Excel team the kernel devs I talked to knew their stuff and were of the highest quality. More importantly they cared and stuck around to see the consequences of their actions.

The windows org has a reputation of being dysfunctional although I never personally observed this, and personally think even if it were true it would be in the higher level parts of the stack.

Kernel dev was my original dream but I fell in love with Excel during my internship. I definitely think you should go for it.
HugoConf 2022 – all presentations and workshop videos
I like the idea in the comments, set the WiFi password an NFC tag.
Isn't this a completely normal sign-up flow? Seen it many times.
Actually, this has been false or at least highly questionable for quite some time.

"Command-line tools can be faster than your Hadoop cluster"

http://aadrake.com/command-line-tools-can-be-235x-faster-tha...

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8908462
> It's just a fucking table, focus on what matters.

Lol, it's the nerd equivalent of penny wise, pond foolish.
is this the same video? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJO3_UADLGk

I don't have an instagram account...
Multi planetary? No. I do not think so. Musk will run out of money before he comes anywhere close to landing a few thousands tons of cargo on mars.

Self sustaining moon base? Possible.

Huge autonomous telescope on the moon? Really cool, possible but not a priority.
Fair enough. But, something has cough my attention.

> we are almost certainly speaking from completely different ontological perspectives

Do you consider me ontologically evil? Am I, as some people on the internet often refer to those with my sense of mortality, “a demon wearing human flash”?
For some comparison, I recently did an OCR comparison for some work for a professor. To set some context, all documents were 1960s era typed or handwritten documents in English, specifically from this archive - http://allenarchive.iac.gatech.edu/. I hand transcribed 50 documents to use as a base comparison and ran them through the various OCR engines getting the results below.

Overall Typed Handwritten
OCR Engine Leven Cosine Leven Cosine Leven Cosine
Amazon Textract 91.63% 98.14% 92.07% 98.76% 87.99% 92.10%
Google Vision 93.05% 97.97% 93.84% 98.99% 85.86% 88.11%
Microsoft Azure 80.32% 95.61% 80.65% 96.20% 79.14% 90.21%
TrOCR 78.66% 93.97% 80.64% 96.65% 59.96% 67.89%
PaddleOCR 84.82% 90.73% 88.60% 96.28% 49.64% 37.58%
Tesseract 86.67% 89.53% 91.14% 95.63% 44.54% 31.39%
Easy OCR 81.79% 85.07% 85.50% 91.89% 46.87% 19.23%
Keras OCR 58.03% 83.57% 59.32% 89.98% 46.08% 21.20%

Leven is Levenshtein Distance. Overall is a weighted average of typed vs handwritten, 90/10 if I recall correctly. All results were run on my personal machine with a 5950X, 128 GB RAM, and a RTX 3080.

From my analysis the Amazon Textract was excellent, the best of all the paid ones, and while TrOCR and PaddleOCR were the best FOSS ones, the issue with them is that they require a GPU while Tesseract I could use on CPU alone. For instance to OCR all 50 documents.

Tessearct 1:19
TrOCR (GPU) 27:33
TrOCR (CPU) 3:04:22

TrOCR is great if you need to do a few or have GPUs to burn, but Tesseract is by far better if you need good enough for a large volume of documents, and for my project the intent was to make a software plugin that could be sent to libraries/universities, CPU is king.
Isn't MS Pluton already standard in all new processors?
LOL abortion has been done since before homo sapiens branched off into their own species. Christians believe that their god performs millions of abortions every day (they call them miscarriages).

Abortions are in every culture on every continent.

Claiming it stems from the 20th century is insane.

You have it wrong, future humans will look back and wonder why we didn't abort more when we clearly couldn't even meet the needs of the babies we already had.
Thanks for the full translation. I don't know much Latin but even I could tell that the 'translation' in the article was most likely complete bunk.
I think you're right.

K8's (and other similar tools) allow you to push complexity into places that are harder to troubleshoot. Its another layer of abstraction, and too much abstraction is dangerous in complex systems.
I work on Windows (not the kernel) and the best part is that you can work on critical infrastructure without having to be on call. Work life balance is great.
You're correct, no one wants to be dependent on luck. That's not what this article is saying. It's merely saying that putting yourself "out there", potentially gives you many more opportunities, which consequently can turn into producing even more great stuff. I'm sure Einstein was happy his ideas got exposure, and I'm sure that exposure led to collaborations and leverage that he wouldn't have had otherwise.
I know you're joking, but ideally forms like that should put the current country based on GeoIP at the top; these long selects really are kind of annoying: sometimes I accidentally use the keyboard to do weird shit because I accidentally didn't select the browser, some JS dropdowns don't allow typing at all, naming is somewhat inconsistent for some countries ("Netherlands" or "The Netherlands"?)
I did a brief stint fixing some DB issues in the Museum of London (pdp11 v7) and I completely agree. To work in the minutia of the minute books of the guild of glovers in London, over a 400 year period and simultaneously be able to handle asinine requests from the public knowing that ONE in a thousand may serve a purpose, even if only to keep somebody's child alive to history in 20 years time... on a pittance.

Same with staff at the V&A. The new management destroyed all the goodwill behind the scenes.
But you have to watch a video right? IMO that's a terrible way to consume content for entertainment purposes. Great for advertisers though.
I don't think this is accurate at all.

Debugging in a strict FP language is pretty much exactly like debugging in an imperative language. Debugging in a lazy FP language requires somewhat different approaches, but still does not have the problems you are implying here.

> In the end, the result is wrong, good luck finding where.

This is not true. If this was true, nobody would be able to build significant things in FP languages.

> Optimization aside, what you code is what the
computer runs.

> But then you end up with something that doesn't
look at all like what your wrote.

No, you can trace code down through the compiler
transformations and generally understand what
is going on at each level of abstraction.

Compilers for imperative languages are just as
"magical".
in 3 years he'll probably be hired by MS as a reward

like Pottering
In the second image it is clear that more of the nebula is visible, isn't this because more wavelengths of light are being detected? In this case an amateur absolutely can appreciate the technical improvements, the IR is mapped to a visible RGB spectrum...
Why is this being moaned about because of one bad machine _again_.

As much as i love to lay into Microsoft I see little reason to yet, other than speculation and corporate bad practice brought on by massive corporate incompetence, no grand conspiracy…
If this only true if you publish with a particular niche, one that can get you hired somewhere. It effectively becomes more work.
Definitely. I’m also considering in buying more blurey boxes.

Subscription models are good in general and better as seeing Ads all day. But I had prime, Disney, Netflix, Crunchyroll etc. It was to much and I’m just watching old series again. It’s not worthy.
> without going through unsafe code

None of this matters in Rust without unsafe. Pointers technically exist outside unsafe, but you can't do very much with them (you cannot, for example, dereference a pointer). And yes, Rust says that the attempted type pun you describe, which you would need unsafe to create, is Undefined Behaviour.

> you could use unions and get implementation-defined behavior

Type punning with unions is also Undefined Behaviour in C++. The sanctioned way to perform type punning is to memcpy() the data from type A to type B. C++ 20 provides a built-in way to ask for this to be done std::bit_cast
This is amazingly fast.

If I needed to download an app file, 100mb would take minutes.

(not defending a 100mb homepage, but still)
Data analysis is the lowest common denominator of business thinking: the simplest, easiest thing that feels meaningful and objective. Anybody can sum up two lists of numbers in Excel and see which one is bigger.
Part of me thinks you're being facetious, and part of me realizes this exactly the kind of thing car manufacturers would offer. Can you confirm either way?
I can't speak to what that error is but Chrome 96 appears to be from Nov '21 at the earliest which would include a large number of these mitigations.

w.r.t. js vs web asm: I could be wrong but I think V8 is the engine involved with webassembly as well so I'm not sure the wa vs js distinction matters here, but even so my main point is that there were significant software mitigations put into place in the browser. I'd expect reproducing this attack today would be difficult.
Zillow is totally fine financially. Yeah they lost $10b which is bad news but they didn't bet the farm, and as they continue to invest r&d in renter/landlord oriented services they should be fine. It's the Expedia of houses, and people have to live somewhere. Can you put forward any proof at all that they are even struggling, let alone "about to go out of business"?
I'm not writing serialized fiction at the moment, so probably not for me. I'm sure others will be interested, though, especially if you can collect a community of readers around the site.
My business has a GitHub Actions workflow that collects statistics from the GitHub Users and Repositories APIs. 1% of the platform is doing anything at all. In essence, yes, publishing your work does increase your luck.[1]

It puts you in the other half of the distribution pool, those that do--versus the 99%+ who do not.

[1]: https://github.com/andrewmcwattersandco/github-statistics
Is there anything stronger than blowfish? seems like I would just do that 50,000 rounds of blowfish mixed with SHA512 rounds in between randomly. Good luck trying to brute force an excerpt from the Bible written in Japanese backwords using esoteric usage of special characters to top it off.

I expect this to take at least a few millenias to crack
The alleged hack is reported by all major US news outlets

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/joe-biden/secret-service-sa...

It's just that a 4chan post isn't much to go on.

Kind of like when they all reported on his hacked laptop, but all they had was a hard drive Giuliani refused to share.
Webb isn’t optimized to produce maximally pretty pictures, because most of Webb’s groundbreaking science is not necessarily going to involve pretty pictures. For example, Webb will tell us otherwise-unknowable things about the atmospheric composition of exoplanets—but it will not produce stunning photos of them (too small and far away to look like more than a pinpoint). Webb will tell us discipline-defining things about the cosmological conditions in the very earliest years of the universe—but that doesn’t mean it can show us pictures of the earliest galaxies in the same close-up detail as it could of a nearby galaxy. The latter image, while more breathtaking for us laypeople, would not tell us much of anything new.

With that said, NASA is not unaware of the PR value of pretty pictures (they weren’t the point of Hubble either!) and I have no doubt that we will be getting plenty of them.
Apple devices are the opposite of utilitarian. Utility is routinely sacrificed for the purpose of shaving off 1mm to tout in marketing material.
Back in 2013 I published my first book. It's a collection of "funny" texts that I wrote during my blog years. It was hard as you can imagine to publish it. Even harder to make money out of it. My publisher is from Portugal and I'm from Brazil, they sold the books in both countries. I know for a fact that some of my friends bought the book, but they never showed on the publisher spreadsheet of how many books they sold and how much I've earned. It was a proud moment of my life nevertheless, but it would be more fun if I have made some money out of it.
It doesn’t add much other than a lack of open public docs of a new feature that’s not been widely adopted yet. I’m not panicking.
Except the hit to your credit score.
Custody solutions: which option is right for me?
The answers you will get here at HN will mostly be misplaced hatred against Microsoft, from people who hate MS, because someone else here at HN hates MS.

I think what you should do is, if possible, arrange for a short call with some of the team mates that you are going to work with. Just a casual one about how the kernel team day to day work looks like there. If not with the team, then maybe with your manager.

Unless someone from that team or some ex-kernel team member replies here, all the rest of these posts are just speculative and not worth basing your decision on.
Similarly, if your political ideology gets their way, it's a "success of democracy", while if anyone else's ideas get traction, it's the "end of democracy". When, ironically, that very thought pattern is itself the end of democracy.
QR code is not particularly dense (like compared to something like a hard drive) - why waste space that could not be put towards more redundancy (error correction)?
That, too, but I wouldn't be surprised if they had a non-ML path for simple sensor or CV checks.
Your example involves two-way communication. These cheap key fobs are one-way. It’s more like:

(Press button) “hey, I’m the fob!”

(Press button) “hey, I’m the fob!”

There’s no communication back from the car because these systems are physically incapable of it.

Also, without some elaboration, your example is vulnerable to a replay attack too, but it’s not conceptually hard to fix. A simple arrangement that probably works (but would want a proof!) is:

“Hey, I’m fob #123”
“Hey fob #123, I’m the car. The challenge is abc. Answer after 5ms.”
“Hey car, HMAC(‘abc’, our secret) = ‘xyz’)”

And the car answers and also checks that the answer was received no more than 5.0000001 ms later. There are more clever variants of this sort of thing in the literature, and I don’t think cars use them because the manufacturers don’t seem to care. (The main problem with the scheme above that I’m immediately aware of is that it requires very good timing. If the microcontroller in the fob takes nearly 5ms to calculate the MAC and the goal is 100ns of allowable latency (100 ms is about 100 light-feet), then the timing precision needed is 20 ppm. Getting precision that good on a cheap key fob may be challenging. For that matter, getting that level of precision in the car, which may be rather hot, may cost more than the manufacturer wants to pay. More clever schemes don’t need this kind of precision. Also, my silly scheme has the fob broadcasting its identity every time a button is pressed, which isn’t great.)
That's not what I'm saying.

I said that saying K8s is like X requires that you show how it is like X first, before you can draw any conclusions from that analogy. Otherwise, it is not an argument and should have zero value in a conversation, other than someone stating their (unsupported) opinion.
"Türkiye" isn't Turkish. It originates from Latin "Turchia" (land of Turks) and later French "Turquie." Actually, "Turkey" is anglicized form of "Turquie." So, there's no difference between two words apart from that both got adapted to the phonetic repository of their respective languages. So, even if all English-speakers start using "Türkiye" today, it'll probably degrade to "Turkey" anyway. This was such a waste of resources.

"Türkiye" has no meaning in Turkish. Proper "land of Turks" in Turkish would be "Türkyurdu" ("yurt" meaning home/homeland, yes, the same word for those large tents as they were the homes of nomadic Turks in Central Asia).
hmm...I was expecting a different context, but isn't it a bit tough to flag speaking English in a US university as appropriation ? Worse case scenario, her ancestry didn't chose to come to the US...

Was also expecting something way more Scottish from your description, when it's basically a uni-color classic cut orange sweater.

PS: also yes, what a jerky way to come at people.
> And you mentioned democracy? Tell me where that place exists? I don’t see any country where majority of its population can decide laws, restrictions and other decisions?

At least in English, this kind of performative misunderstanding of the term "democracy" as if it's pedantically incorrect in the situation is itself incorrect. It does not make you look smarter. It makes it look like you've had zero exposure whatsoever to the fields of political science or political philosophy, where "democracy" is universally used as an umbrella term unless greater precision is required.
> But I think most people can easily tell the difference between the widespread colonization that occurred for hundreds of years and whatever historical anomalies you have in mind with that leading question.

I was referring to Ireland, whose colonisation[1][2] during the 16th and 17th centuries served almost as a prototype for future British expansion. Gaelic culture was nearly wiped out due to British policies, and even to this day, Irish is a severely endangered language. It remains the one of the few regions in Europe with a lower population in the present than it had in 1800.

But sure, let's call it a historical anomaly.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plantations_of_Ireland

[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cromwellian_conquest_of_Irelan...
Wow, people like to shit on Apple, but this is yet another example of something that just works.
Diffraction spikes are caused before the lens gets involved; improving the lenses cannot remove the spikes (though there may be structures causing diffraction spikes in-between lenses).

The spikes from JWST are primarily caused by the edges of the mirrors and the three support struts.

There likely is some amount of lens flare (though I don't know if it is significant, the optics are Very Good), but the dominant artefact is the diffraction spikes.
Yes, looks like it. You can watch the video without having an account, although the Instagram site is super annoying to navigate when you're not logged in, same as Twitter.
At what age do people first experience depression?
These are all important questions. There is one way to answer them. Hunter Biden could dispute the contents of some content – any content – on this laptop. Has he done that?
I have created Hypermedia APIs using HTTP/JSON for service-to-service interactions, and it is definitely a lot of work for questionable benefit.

The biggest problem with the bad style of RPC-style programming was the assumption that remote calls could be treated like local calls. Modern HTTP-based RPC APIs don't make that assumption and thr problems of distributed computing are handled explicitly.

The semantics of HTTP verbs, semantically meaningful namespace trees for resources in the URL, standard authentication and encoding, etc are all nice benefits of HTTP APIs even without hypermedia.

That said, I haven't given up on hypermedia APIs! I liken them to "fluent" APIs of OOP. It's a powerful design approach, but I just wonder how to capture the benefits of that approach over what most people are doing today.
Seems like there's certainly a split there. Lots of popular musicians, for instance, from very humble economic backgrounds. Athletes as well - trust fund kids don't seem, as a rule, to be single-mindedly enough focused on sports throughout their entire childhood and adolescence to hit the top tiers.

Maybe the common link between those two, and unlike some other fields, is that the work has to be put in in childhood and adolescense, when "being paid" isn't much of a thing anyway for anyone.
Before Guernica Won over the World, It Flopped
People have many different reasons for writing. I've actually had this discussion with authors and you seem to be suggesting that people shouldn't be allowed to accept token payments for work if they aren't dependent on it directly as a full-time occupation. Are you going to ban bloggers etc. in general because they dilute the market for writing at sustainable professional rates?

Amateurs (or pros using an activity like writing in support of some other professional activity) make it more difficult for would-be pros--see also photography, people who do open source development on their own time, etc. Too bad.
An open-source implementation of the Rethinking Spatial Dimensions of Vision Transformers research paper in Google's #JAX and #Flax.

JAX/Flax Repository: https://github.com/conceptofmind/PiT-flax

PiT Research Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.16302

Official Github Repository: https://github.com/naver-ai/pit

In collaboration with Dr. Phil 'Lucid' Wang: https://github.com/lucidrains.
> think that if you want to make the big bucks but still work with c/c++

Judging by the presenters at CPPCon, a significant fraction of highly-skilled and highly-paid C++ devs are employed in the High Frequency Trading (HFT) industry.

They meet OP's criteria in many ways as well, as HFT trading tends to be "very close to the metal", optimised to death, and often involves solving deep technical problems. It's diametrically opposed to modern web development practices.
We are at the end of one cycle of "social" apps.

If we now stop and look back over the last 15 years we see

1. Art has degraded as Artists are optimizing their work for share-ability and a quick consuming audience.[1]

2. Social networks are pulling us further apart than bringing us together.[2]

3. Don't get me started on influencer culture[3]

[1]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPWkHtFPHH8&t=645s

[2] https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-00805-0

[3] https://techcrunch.com/2022/01/10/hype-house-creator-economy...
Am I being too harsh if I point out that this product exists solely to profit on the misfortune of others? It just doesn't seem like that would help - "Hey, you got laid off, but they paid some of the money they don't have to hire a consultant to 'craft the right message' for ya."
Sold 7/31/2020: $872,019
Listed 7/8/2022: $1,200,000

House flippers like you are a major contributing factor to the housing affordability crisis, which has ripple effects further down the market, that contribute to the homelessness crisis.

With all due respect, get the **** out of here.