skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Is this something researchers using Google Drive should be aware of?

This is something EVERYONE using Google Drive should be aware of. Your data on Google Drive is scanned by Google (and not only for policy violations), meaning it is not secured FROM Google, and false positives can and will cause your data to be lost and cause your account to be flagged. Using Google Sheets means that is your only copy of the data, so you also have no backup.

Google does not provide support for this service.
This is exactly the content I want to see here. I love it. It's so over the top and min-maxed. This is optimized beyond efficiency and I whole-heartedly approve.
This would probably be terrible for application code. But when you are doing quick math/science exploration with mostly linear program flow and want to change a few things upstream, it could be useful. Everything has its place
>existence is logically presupposed in any description of state

Then please explain how you can write and I can understand the phrase "A thing which does not exist".
I've been reading quite a few more of these lately.

It appears that LinkedIn has a problem not only with the tsunami of everyday recruiter spam flooding out their primary value proposition (real biz connections), but now criminal scams exploiting their platform.

Seems like one of those tipping point phenomena, that doesn't seem critical, until it is, and by then, it's too late and mostly all of the customers have decided they're done with it.
> The 1.5-3.5% credit card processing fee for starters.

Compared to... 1 dollar, no, 15 dollars, no, 5 dollars, no, 65 dollars, no, ... transaction fees for Bitcoin.
> When your product is so worthless and uncompelling on nearly half customers don't use it and your business model relies on them forgetting they're paying for it, then your industry is DONE.

I think this is the model most commercial gyms operate on.
Hence why most companies don't accept placements by recruiters unless it's the one they specifically hired for the job
It's always been apparent to some of us. Unless I have an explicit need to actively collaborate with another person on some document I've continued to use locally saved LibreOffice documents for everything, and even then I still download a copy from Google Drive when finished/periodically.
From other replies to your question I understand that you use "chaotic" in the mathematical sense while other commenters use it in the colloquial ("random") sense.
What would you advise, instead?

If a nuke goes off, the FEMA steps of get inside, stay inside, and stay tuned is your best bet.

Yes, some people will need to evacuate, but it's a pretty small slice of the overall affected population-- better for everyone to wait for specific instructions on what to do than to have everyone in a massive jam trying to flee and exposing themselves to high levels of radiation and other hazards.
as a mod of some niche medium engagement/high quality subs, I still link to the self-promo guidelines because while they're no longer updated, they give the clearest example towards how not to use Reddit.

Mods have full discretion though, that's the gist of this entire thread. As someone with a 16 year old reddit account I've seen a lot of bad moderators though.
That idle time seriously needs an option to change it. It's stupid how it works now.
Probably not, but can be a source. Which is why it is regulated and steps are taken to a) reduce E. coli in the sludge and b) apply it at certain times, etc. per the EPA link.

https://extension.psu.edu/use-of-biosolids-in-crop-productio...

Treatment methods eliminate more than 95% of the pathogens in sewage sludge; the risk of disease from those that remain in biosolids is short-term because most of them do not survive beyond 30 days in the soil environment. In addition to requiring pathogen reduction treatment, Pennsylvania's biosolids regulations contain several risk reduction and management requirements that reduce the likelihood of disease to very low levels. These requirements include:

treatment and management practices to reduce the attraction of disease vectors and thus the probability that pathogens would be transferred from biosolids to humans or animals
application setback requirements from occupied dwellings and from water sources
minimum time requirements from biosolids application to harvest, ranging from 30 days for forage and feed crops to 38 months for some food crops
no grazing allowed within 30 days of biosolids application to pastures
If carefully followed, these requirements make the risk of disease from land-applied biosolids similar to or lower than that of land-applied manures. In fact, there are no documented cases of human or animal diseases being contracted from land-applied biosolids.

https://extension.colostate.edu/topic-areas/nutrition-food-s...

Changes in microorganisms have undoubtedly contributed to this increase, as have changes in growing, harvesting, distribution, processing and consumption practices. Listeria monocytogenes, Clostridium botulinum and Bacillus cereus are naturally present in some soils. Their presence on fresh produce is not uncommon. Salmonella, E. coli O157:H7, Campylobacter jejuni, Vibrio cholerae, parasites and viruses can contaminate produce through raw or improperly composted manure, irrigation water containing untreated sewage or manure, and contaminated wash water. Contact with mammals, reptiles, fowl, insects and unpasteurized animal products are other sources of contamination.

Animal manure is a far more common source.
If you assume malice, Apple could have been purposely limiting performance and setting up the M1 to look better by comparison.
This is great especially because there is still no M1 version of teams and running the Intel version of teams on M1 makes the whole computer slow to a crawl.

But, at this point, I have to wonder if teams is just abandonware. Stuff like this thread and the lack of M1 support 2.5 years after the M1 transition was announced and over a year after you could walk into an apple store and buy an M1 computer? I don't understand what could prevent them from releasing an M1 version besides a complete lack of will to do so.
Webpack really messed up IMO -- v5 took a really, really long time to drop because they were making huge changes ostensibly for performance... and then when it came out it actually made performance worse for many projects. I think they've fixed that now, but the damage is done.

I think building js in js is just not fast enough anymore, everyone is moving towards compiled languages for building their apps. The next winner in the space will be something like vite that uses a compiled language under the hood (vite uses esbuild, which is written in Go).
If you hold shift while you paste it will remove all formatting.
Unfortunately this is a reason for single family homes on large lots. Privacy. I have large hedges between me and my neighbors which block visuals and all but the loudest noises.
> Also, nice title, "Cant Back Out", claiming its fact?

According to Twitter is literally in the headline.
Correct. It happens in my windows 10 too. It messes all yaml content.
With the proviso that I am woefully behind on reading up on the retrieval market developments, I understand that there's a few projects being built in parallel with different emphasis. One model is essentially a P2P CDN, where the verification would be distributed across, essentially, IPFS nodes: https://pl-strflt.notion.site/Filecoin-Saturn-efc122f123f344...

Another, which I will try and dig up a link to (if I haven't imagined it entirely) is more of a sentinel system, whereby clients and storage providers have a protocol to pick a neutral third party that escrows and streams FIL payments from clients to SPs, conditional on retrievability. But as I say, I'm not an expert here.
It's not a "marketing thing". The whole version requirement syntax in package.json (i.e. "^1.2.3") and other non-JS package managers really only works if a package follows semver, so that's the reason 99% of JS packages do.

This is why when you npm add a dependency it defaults to the "^1.2.3" syntax, which means the dependency is upgradeable to the next minor version, which, as SemVer states, should be guaranteed to be backwards compatible.

Of course you can just disregard that, make breaking changes whenever you want and annoy your users enormously.

https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/v8/configuring-npm/package-json#v...

https://docs.npmjs.com/about-semantic-versioning

AFAIK Go doesn't follow any kind of versioning scheme (since they don't use a versioned module manager), but the project itself is semver-compliant. No breaking changes are introduced since Go 1.0 was released. The proposals for breaking language changes will be planned for Go 2.0. Generics aren't breaking old code.

There is no reason, unless your name is Linus Torvalds or you're marketing driven such as your browser, not to follow Semver. It's a good and simple idea.
To me, the subject of "the monied class is making off with their spoils and cashing the stock market in" seems intentionally generically-bad, so as to be outrage-driven agreeable to everyone.

Are we talking about the hyper-wealthy? Business owners? Business managers? Investors in general? It's unclear.

There are a lot of complicated things going on and being generically angry at people with "more" money is uninformative and unproductive.

As near as I can tell, the parent's policy prescriptions amount to (1) we should allow asset bubbles to pop harder, (2) we should have created less(?) or more strictly controlled(method undefined?) COVID emergency debt, and (3) we should implement price controls for consumer goods(?).
Disclaimer (if it isn't obvious already): Sam Altman is an investor in Helion Energy. (Lead investor for Helion's E round raise).
> Do you care if it's a society that doesn't value you or has completely different values?

I learned at a young age that society doesn't value me, and I've shaped my life accordingly. I have this quote from Dumas in my profile for a reason.

> "Perhaps what I am about to say will appear strange to you gentlemen, socialists, progressives, humanitarians as you are, but I never worry about my neighbor, I never try to protect society which does not protect me -- indeed, I might add, which generally takes no heed of me except to do me harm -- and, since I hold them low in my esteem and remain neutral towards them, I believe that society and my neighbor are in my debt."
Pin on IPFS with vendors using totally different networks. There is also Sia and Storj.
Par, a Text Formatting Program
I'm happy to admit mistakes (and correct them!) but this is inaccurate. We don't edit titles to put our own personal spin on a topic, which is what the word editorializing means. We look closely at the article itself to find what it is actually saying. If we do replace a title, we replace it with representative language from the article itself wherever possible. This has been the case for a long time: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que....

That does involve some interpretive judgment—because why pick one phrase rather than another—but less than you might think, because nearly every article has a point where the author says what they're actually writing about.

We never do this to convey an opinion of our own. We don't much care what people think or what an article says. We care whether the title accurately represents what the article is saying, and does so in a way that isn't baity, because that is the biggest influence on discussion quality.

The submission you guys are bringing up (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31396861) illustrates the point. "Why I no longer recommend Julia" is a baity title, because it doesn't say anything specific about why. It's just a pointer that says "I boo Julia". "Boo $language" is for sure flamebait on this site.

Such titles generate threads that are just generic boo-vs.-yay ventings between people who like $thing and people who don't. The substantive points of the article are lost under such a title. This is not true on the original blog, because there the title is just the first sentence, and any comments show up only at the end. But it's definitely true on an internet forum where the title is the entire representation of the article for most readers and commenters.

For that reason, we chose to change the title, and for that we looked at the article (https://yuri.is/not-julia/) to find where it says what it is actually about—the "representative language" I mentioned above. This was not hard to find—it's in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th paragraphs of the OP. Particularly the 4th, which reads:

My conclusion after using Julia for many years is that there are too many correctness and composability bugs throughout the ecosystem to justify using it in just about any context where correctness matters.

That's the article's own summary of what it says, so we made it the title. Basically we followed the pointer and replaced it with what it points to.
>This also underlines the importance of self sufficiency in necessities.

Embarrassingly for your argument, trying to be self-sufficient is exactly what brought on this crisis. Reckless attempts at protectionism and nativism can be just as damaging as reliance on unreliable trade partners.

Economic security is very important of course, but for most countries self-sufficiency is either flat out unattainable or an incredibly expensive luxury. Fortunately there are other ways to achieve economic security, the most important of which is figuring out who you can trust, and hedging the risks of any exposure you have to those you can't.
Show HN: Sweetfont – Search for Fonts by ‘Vibe’
The key point, to me, is that Google monitors all content. I don't think it's much of a surprise, but in context of Google Drive, it's pretty terrible. Drive is a anti-product like this. It's like if Western Digital decided to update the disk firmware to just ship your data to them for scrutiny.
this is it. also needs emphasis on getting a clean tea towel or equivalent out of the drawer, do not be tempted to use anything else.
Hard agree. It's very easy to find people who agree with whatever your particular brand of crazy is. And it does not help that online people can say things they would never say face to face.
> you may find that it is less risky or costly. Many people chose e2e encrypted messengers because they don't trust a third party with their private messages

Private messages are not money. Example: you ordered some goods and those arrived in bad shape. What's your recourse in the trustless world?
Koka has that [0].

a.f(b) == f(a, b)

[0]: https://koka-lang.github.io/koka/doc/book.html#sec-dot
I think collabora might me the most active version of it:
https://hub.docker.com/r/collabora/code

I haven't tried it myself.
As with all of these threads, someone needs to tell me why I shouldn't be optimistic about this. I'm not a physicist, and only partially grok all the technical challenges with making something like this work. I'm skeptical, but that's because so many others with so much money have been working on Fusion, so why is Helion different?
Rather than "understand" I'll talk about complex "accomplishments".

I once built a computer. I had Alan Clements "Microprocessor Systems
Design" for an undergraduate text and built a 68000 based machine with
64M of RAM and ROM. Using discrete ICs on two big Eurorack wirewrap
cards was hard work and needed good eyesight and dexterity. Then I
wrote a bootloader and kermit-like like RS232 program loader, and
finally hashed together a really basic OS from Tannenbaum (with a
synchronous scheduler and fixed job table). A long summer of late
nights. Can I say "I understand computers". No way! But I feel
confident I know more about them than most people I'll ever meet.

Another heroic adventure was "Linux from Scratch", compiling
everything along the way with tinycc.

These things are rites of passage. They don't mean I understand
those things, and even if I did, that knowledge is obsolete today, but
I'm glad I did them.
Amazon doesn't even give their drivers time to piss, they're not going to wait for signatures.
I wonder if this Ultrasound Directional Jammer would be the right mix of legal and proportionate.

https://www.tinytxs.com/products/ultrasonic-jammer
Thought the exact same when I first started using it, then realised the benefits of the syntax:

1. It allows for the "async transparency" feature to work!

2. It enables first class event handling in a much less verbose way than Javascript. Unlocks the power of the native event system.

3. Less verbose ways to do Locality of Behavior.

You get a number of escape hatches, and hyperscript is capable of being mixed with javascript:

Call javascript directly

_='on click call alert("Javascript called directly")'

Embed javascript directly

_='on click js alert("Javascript mixed in hyperscript") end'

Next release will bring javascript comments to make learning and migrating blocks of code easier.

// and /* ... */

Also I must say you do get used to the syntax relatively quickly.
What I meant by "work" is, that inside your methods you have to return an object, which has the method, which is the next thing in your a().b().c()... chain. Often in OOP you would not return the object itself, unless you do the builder pattern. Of course you can return other objects, if it is intended, that the chain has a call to a method of another object next. However, you may only call methods of the returned objects and you must return objects.

In the function and data scenario, all that needs to be made sure is, that your functions have the return type, which the next function expects, otherwise it is a type error, regardless of whether the language complains or not. A function call chain implicitly assumes the types to be correct, otherwise you will likely run into an error.

The difference is, that in the functions and data scenario, you already have functions, which take data of some type and return data of some type. You do not change them in any way, while on the other hand with objects and methods you need to change the methods, so that they do return some fitting objects.
Seconding this. PML is high quality, active, and well documented.
Tesla Superchargers Are Opening Up to Any Electric Car in the US
Well, yeah. Generally I've learned to just not care what happens on reddit. Moderators do whatever they want and jerk you around if you ask sincere questions. It's not worth pretending or expecting anything else. And it's not like mods are paid either, so you can't really fault anyone because nobody really knows the reality of everything going on in the subreddit. It's just how it works.
was at a big corp, you could be contacted over teams, skype, slack, or email, with meetings in teams or zoom.
> Satoshi, 2009-02-11

Yes. Because society is built in trust. Something crypto world is busy rediscovering.
Google wasresponding to groups that complain that the spam filter was heavy. Now some spam is getting through, people start to complain about that which will make the spam filter heavy again. Not sure what the right answer is.. fastmail has seemingly figured it out.

Removing files in google drive will kill drive. How can you trust them?
Have you tried using anything non-Google recently? Everything else is much, much worse IMO. Remember we all mostly moved to Google because they were the only ones who could actually deal with spam, gaming, and the more sophisticated attacks at scale. Now that they're the only game in town, adversaries are focusing hard on getting past their filters etc, and some are getting through.

When you have literally millions of people whose livelihood depends on gaming algorithms, or getting past content filters, then some highly intelligent and motivated individuals are going to get through, that's a fact of life.

When someone figures out how to train their robots better than Google, then Google will have some competition, but they seem to be about a decade ahead of everyone else, and only accelerating relative to the rest of the field, so I'm doubtful that anyone is going to catch up any time soon.
Also possible with Chrome.
Those are 4 microbenchmarks. There are much larger and more realistic workloads benchmarked in other places (see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32084768 for links), with very different results.
I'd argue the asset store was the beginning of the (very slow) end.

Before the asset store Unity's community was a hotbed of openly shared innovation.

The moment Unity gave people an easy way to slap together what would have been a quick post to the forums with a webplayer link, some code samples and a few paragraphs explaining it... into a paid package that sells for $5... that ended quickly.

And the worst part is, the skillset to manage a paid library is not the same one needed to develop some cool tech! There are so so many packages on the asset store that are practically abandoned, or poorly suited for integration into someone else's codebase (some people have no issue with warnings everywhere in their code for example...), or are poorly documented, or will break on any platform that wasn't the original dev's personal machine. The list goes on.

-

I don't have anything against indie game devs making money, I know the struggle of slaving away at something and ending up broke for your trouble... but I really wish the asset store had been restricted to game assets like 3D models, sounds, etc.

It's not like people wouldn't be able to sell their code then either. It's just before the asset store if you wanted to create a paid distributed library, the inertia you'd have to overcome was a pretty good filter against low-effort attempts. There were still successful libraries that were worked on full time and sold as products
"Arizona seeks out new sources of water that will provide sustainable water moving forward."

We need breathing room!

Arizona is a desert, and there are ... googles ... 7 million people living there that should not be. There are 300 golf courses! There should be ZERO open air heavily-manicured grass golf courses in a landlocked desert.

When people joke that if you want to settle mars, let's settle Antarctica, it's closer and easier to do... well, the REAL settling-mars project is Arizona.

I've also heard that Las Vegas, another middle of the desert atrocity, is also 100% water efficient.

I've also been told about things like "clean coal", "fracking doesn't turn farmers water on fire", "pesticides are safe", "global warming isn't real", and a host of other big fat lies that you'll only discover are wrong in the future when it is too late.

So either you are being mendacious, or you are happily eating the big lie served up to you on a platter.

Humanity is so screwed.
I love this because I use markdown heavily in vim. I can't get vim markdown plugin to support auto bullet point insertion and nice `gq` bulleted list paragraph formatting at the same time[1]. However, vim lets you set a program that will do the paragraph formatting for you. I think I could use this to get `gq` to work while still having auto bullet point insertion!

1: https://github.com/preservim/vim-markdown/issues/232
Something something gatekeeping by old people
Bet most of those rely on heavy regulations of the government to prevent competition.
Why? Can you explain why the two should be treated the same?

That‘s not at all the case in many other legal contexts.
> I thought linked lists were one of the easier data structures to implement?

Unless you are a Rustacean…
Those extra steps are important because they create legal deniability. For example, local jurisdictions (or judicial outcomes) tell police they can't do X, Y, or Z because it's government overreach. So police just look for corporations that engage in those activities and purchase the data from them, with your tax money. So instead of the Stasi you end up with Corpsec.com, but it's OK because there's a middleman making a dollar, good old capitalism.
why assume that the review would be done by a human?

I'd wager the "reviewer" it's merely a more computationally expensive process