skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Van Gogh, well known for reusing canvases, you'd probably want to X-ray any of his paintings to see if there was anything underneath, or in this case on the reverse.
In my mind it is the same problem everywhere. Supply is too low and is kept low for many reasons. There is insane demand from around the world to live in Manhattan.
Panels are recycled now. Wind and solar don't destroy habitats and don't take up "huge amounts of land". Wind turbines take up negligible land that can be used for other purposes. Agrivoltaics is showing you can even do this with solar and it boosts some crop outputs. I really don't get the renewable hate. It has its place in the energy mix.
Do you know what genocide means?
That's assuming Blizzard would've gone with Unity if there was a 5% royalty. Unreal isn't necessarily getting 5% out of bigger titles either, that's just the standard license.
The instagrammers and tiktokers have poisoned the well. If there is a human subject in the picture who is posing, it's now pretty safe to assume it's a social media narcissist, and I see no reason to step around or enable their behavior.
I won't touch Unity or their stock with a ten-foot pole now. If they did this to please investors, then they're wrong.
Come on. No one wants to live in Kansas. And it's extremely difficult to build in a rural setting. You try prototyping an experimental cutting-edge technology in the middle of a corn field 2 hours from the nearest Home Depot or metal fabricator.
Moved all my domains to cloudflare. Never been happier.
> "I voted! You should get out and vote too" feels like an example of
positive virtual signalling.

Good point. This is a clear example of where "virtue signalling"
(leading by example in this case) can be considered a good. rather
than an ostentatious, pretentious, or pridefull showing-off of empty
virtue.
MIT Project Athena was also hugely influential: X Windows wasn't the only thing to spin out, but MATLAB and other pre-cursors of today's Jupyter style notebooks. The VAX super-mini grid could be used at night as a renderfarm ;)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Athena
> (...) there should be heavy state intervention (...)

This has been tried so many times throughout different cultures and time periods, and by different means. It will not benefit whoever is actually living on the properties, but will detract from their situation.

Economics in One Lesson by Henry Hazlitt has several concrete examples of attempted interventions, and is written to give a basic intuition on why this happens (Spoiler: Opportunity costs).

The only permanent solution is just to build more buildings, or at a political level simply making it easier to build new buildings, which directly increases supply and thus causes the lowering of prices. This makes perfect sense when you think about it: There are not enough buildings, so we need to have more buildings.
I wish behaviour like this was weeded out in the interview process. It is really damaging to teams and productivity and I would estimate most people won't try to fix it like OP has tried.
Wouldn’t the reverse question then be, why hasn’t someone in the Midwest done this already?
Yeah it's definitely questionable... but banning someone using your images commercially feels right to me, especially in the context of this kind of exploitation. It isn't as blatant as creepshots, but it feels abusive.

We can't hold so tightly to free speech that it erodes reasonable individual rights, but what's "reasonable" is often a grey area. Worth debating.
I really appreciate the efforts for gitimmersion.com.

https://gitimmersion.com/lab_31.html is likely where you would want to explore.
hths!
Unfortunately I think I have the exact opposite problem (don't talk enough) but awesome work! And thank you for making and clarifying that it is private and 100% on device. More tools need to be like this!
>The current setup creates guettos by default, by siloing people with different monetary and social capital into different building and areas, hurting social mobility,

Maybe some groups of people don't want to live together with other groups of people? Different people living in different parts of the city is just natural evolution.

Why should the state force them to live together?

And why should the state tell you where to live? Why should the state be involved in your private life at all?
to me, self awareness seems like a matter of what language you use, whether your verbs and adjectives confer agency to the machine doing something "itself"

it reminds me of the debate around language use in science education, I always like to frame interactions as "wants", a positively charged magnet "wants" to move towards negative and so on, but a coworker would always correct me, the inanimate objects want for nothing, they simply act according to laws of physics

but I guess i'm just rehashing an old debate on a cool new project, I like what they've done here, I just noticed the language in the article is obtusely skewed towards what the robot does itself, and not what the robot was programmed to do
“Last year, the Guardian reported on how the Queen’s consent process had been used to allow the royal family to vet more than 1,000 laws during the reign of Elizabeth II before parliament was permitted to debate them.

Buckingham Palace has repeatedly claimed that Queen’s consent is a purely formal process that does not result in substantive changes to policy. However, that claim has been undermined by documents relating to various laws passed throughout the Queen’s reign suggesting that she or her representatives took advantage of the process to secure personal carve-outs.” [1]

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/jul/14/what-does-qu...
These platforms still have an install process for the applications which involves the ability to run third party software with elevated permissions.

E.g. for Steam see the Install Script section here:
https://partner.steamgames.com/doc/sdk/goldmaster
Our customers are technology companies based in the Bay Area, check out the home page: https://charmindustrial.com

We delivered 90% of permanent carbon removals globally last year:
https://twitter.com/charmindustrial/status/14511691760646430...
There is some gain in that you need to explicitly say that something is evaluatable, like:

(+ 1 2)

as opposed to:

1+2

Whether the gain is worth it is, I agree, debatable.
Or put another way: you can execute, with the highest levels of excellence, a bad idea and fail the same.
We are a very long established bricks and mortar Irish retailer that chose to go online with Shopify and use Shopify Payments for online transactions only at the beginning of the pandemic. Today, we were given essentially given a couple of days to provide invoices from all our suppliers and letters of authorisation from each of them.

We have a lot of suppliers all over Europe and this is the 14th July. To say that we are angry would be a gross understatement.
> To within a fraction of a percent? Probably not, but to within a reasonable fraction of total performance over 13 years... yes.

You didn't answer my question. Could you tell which one had larger returns from the beginning of the period until March of 2009? I couldn't easily tell, and yet VMBFX has a total return of 127% and VFINX 89%
The median individual income in NYC is $34k. In Manhattan, it's $52k. Making 200k puts you in the top 5% of earners in New York City.
In my setup, a minimal SSH agent daemon would run in an enclave, only the necessary parts for key operations. The rest of the agent (protocol parsing etc.) would run in normal userspace and communicate over a channel (through the kernel or some other API, I don't know enough about low level system's programming to come up with the right abstraction).

Even if the user mode side of the agent would be hijacked, all it could do is ask the secure part to sign requests; the key itself would never leave the enclave. The same would be true for other authentication protocols, such as FIDO2/U2F daemons. In effect, once you've found out about a malicious program, you wouldn't need to worry about someone else reusing your key afterwards. Just analyse, then kill all the open sessions for that user and you don't even need to roll over your keys if you trust the enclave well enough.

For password managers the main key store would he handles by the enclave and only the necessary passwords would leave the enclave and cross over to system space. This way you can't just keylog the passphrase and upload the key store to a server, you could at most extract a few passwords per minute by having a malicious daemon run in the background. Granted, this is a lot less practical or secure than the other methods.

The biggest challenge for this all is to get some kind of secret into the system that the normal CPU can't see, but the secure enclave can. I theorise that the TPM would be an excellent place to do this in, but an enclave can contain its own secret store for all I care. If the enclave can do encrypted I/O with its super secret key, the files on the file system would be difficult to tamper with and configuration and state could even be stored safely on a non-encrypted disk! Reusing old, valid credentials would work, of course, but for that a secure counter or whatever may be implemented to mitigate that. The enclave would also need to run each program in complete isolation of each other (basically no multi threading or caches to prevent side channel attacks) but your average computer wouldn't be running more than two or three daemons anyway. Another challenge is to prevent modification of the loaded agent code itself but that again could be secured by a hash stored on the TPM after the program first loads. Associate the secret key with the hash of the program and allow a hash-secured program to upgrade the hash and you've got a pretty difficult to break system, I reckon, without necessitating the use of manufacturer provided certificates and keys like Intel likes to require. You would need a code execution bug in isolated program on the enclave.

I don't really see how you could lock down a secure input path unless you use PS/2. USB input devices are complex and need some level of drivers to work right, especially ones that do more than your cheap plastic office keyboard. I believe Intel does have such a system when their iGPU is used, I believe it has to do with its enterprise remote access tools, but I think this would be too much of an attack surface for general purpose use.
This may not work since I don't know anything about you, but: imagine you discovered this was your own mother (or grandmother or...) in the video.
Stephenson 2-18 is the largest star in the known universe
I was at Case when the Peter B Lewis building opened. I don't recall people getting hit by falling ice but they'd put up warning signs and maybe close the main entrance after snow (which in Cleveland was often).
There was a shooting in the building too. It took 7 hours for the SWAT team to find the gunman and get the hostages out. Apparently the curvy walls and large atrium design are a complete tactical nightmare.
The earth having limited resources is just the inverse of the market can stay irrational longer than you can remain solvent.

Eventually we'll hit that limit [1] but the idea that its going to happen soon is undefended. The issue right now for growth is that we can't mine the earth's resources fast enough right not that we've used it up.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_death_of_the_universe
Drill hole, insert waste: https://vimeo.com/458322589

It's really not that hard, except from a political standpoint.
Surprisingly nheko seems to basically work, including spaces and encryption. I also heard Thunderbird 102 added fairly complete Matrix support, but it takes a little while to roll out to Linux distributions so I haven't tried it yet.
Eh I’d say you’re looking at the wrong culprit. More likely than not, the average person who mindlessly spends time on their phone. Next time you take public transportation, look around you to see what people do when bored - nearly everyone these days is on either TikTok, Reels, YouTube Shorts, or whatever nonsense Facebook calls their short algorithmic video.

It’s everyone - people fall for whatever the path of least resistance to the next dopamine hit is.

And even if not true, you’re discounted bored housewives, the elderly, etc.
How does that look in a microservice/distributed environment in terms of network traffic? Do you have some thoughts about it, minimizing number of queries, minimizing payload, such things?
Why do you feel compelled to do so?

Is it that you feel that a quote from a fantastic book measures the goodness or evilness of the act or are you just saying that someone else already found himself in this dilema in the past and wrote a parable about it with its personal judgement?
Thanks Justine, you're doing the Lord's work here.

One of the best introductions I've seen to pledge() is Kristaps Dzonson's writeup on it that you can find here [1]. The whole website in general is furthermore a guide on how to write webapps in C, which may sound like a crazy idea to some people who have written it off as everything from an elaborate joke to a security nightmare that nobody should ever consider doing [2], but for people like me who end up having to write that kind of code in constrained execution environments it's been extremely enlightening and I really appreciate knowing how to do it more securely. If pledge is something I can access in Linux it really helps me out for things in the future going forward, I hope to create some cool things with it!

[1] https://learnbchs.org/pledge.html

[2] https://learnbchs.org/
Easily mined uranium will deplete in less than 100 years unless we start using breeder or thorium reactors that are more efficient in using up fuel.
Wouldn't it be easier to list the ones that aren't leaky?
I mean, you're wrong... it clearly worked out for them so far and it only took seven weeks to fix this issue. It's taken longer to ship completed commits at Google than that.
IIRC Sometimes some of these units are tied to a mortgage. Renting it at a reasonable price could make the price of the unit to drop making the money lender wanting to renegotiate the mortgage contract.
Check out the Todd Snider song about this called "The Ballad of The Kingsmen."
Vienna was only able to pull that off after a devasting war left nearly everyone poor. It's not clear that the US could seize 40% of rentals in Manhattan without starting a revolution.

To your other points yes. Land Value Tax now! There's simply no good reason for why we're all taxed so heavily on our labor while land speculators get away for pennies.
> He wholeheartedly apologises to Maree if she was offended by what he did and urges her to contact him privately so he can personally apologise. If she requests him to take down the video he will do that.

Is this really how one apologizes these days.
My understanding:

1. Unity only grabs the Indie especially the mobile market.

2. Unity cannot compete with UE without a huge investment.

So the only solution is to go down the ads road. Sorry I really don't see a second option. Only with ads can Unity makes more money to afford more editor development. Editor development needs very expensive people (those senior and staff engineers with large TC) and has no way to prove that it can be profitable so far.
The strict aliasing violation is incidental. You can change int8_t to char in the code and get the same result with no strict aliasing violation.
Just read the Git Book¹ end-to-end.

And refrain from using GUI tools for git; stick with the command line.

¹https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2
You can't fire the people with the money. ;)
My gut feeling is this doesn't entirely explain it, but any tenant is also more work than no tenant, so they may not want to do the work of signing a new lease and dealing with the work it will trigger for less than you're making per-head on your current tenants.

There's probably also a fear that if you let a new tenant in for lower rent, this might lower the rent other people expect and the problem starts snowballing.
It's not clear how much boost.org magic they used. Failing that, a GCC extension could be needful.

From the ref:

---

Conclusion

We attempted to represent ownership and borrowing through the C++ type system, however the language does not lend itself to this. Thus memory safety in C++ would need to be achieved through runtime checks.

Example code

#include <type_traits>

#include <utility>

#include <assert.h>

#include <stddef.h>
I disagree with this:

> First of all, the recessions tend to last longer than most people expect/plan for. Statistically, it will turn out their 'secure' jobs will be less 'secure' than expected. Meanwhile their emergency funds will start shrinking (slowly at first, then all at once) due to loss of purchasing power & eventual job loss.

Those predictions are not supported by the data, and are distinct from your description of them. I disagree with your implied statistics and sloppy use of words. I am skeptical that you can forecast the length of the recession, job loss, or changes in consumer behavior.
Smart Contract Auditing Tools That Every Solidity Developer Should Know
>Just charge customers by the gigabyte like a mobile network or a satellite network.

That's silly on multiple levels (and I'll note Starlink doesn't do any such thing either). The marginal cost of transmitting a gigabyte or terabyte for that matter is effectively zero. Some minuscule fraction of a fraction of a watt. What costs money is bandwidth, priority bandwidth when there is contention, lowest latency bandwidth, 9s of uptime, and support. What's actually needed is for ISPs to be required by law to spell out the SLA for everyone, same as an SLA you'd get with any normal commercial service, and for all shaping to be perfectly neutral to what data is being carried, and that customers themselves may do so themselves as they wish with standard tools (like using PCP fields per 802.1p in the tag control information) within the raw limits of their service agreement.

>It is misleading in the first place to advertise certain speeds on an underutilized network.

The phrase you're looking for is probably "over provisioned" not "under utilitized", and there isn't anything misleading about it per se. Most users have extremely bursty workloads, and they can indeed get what they're paying for when they want it in general. It makes lots of sense for them to split the cost with a bunch of neighbors, everyone gets what they need for less. The lack of transparency is the big issue, markets don't work without information symmetry between sellers and buyers. With real leased lines everything is spelled out, and that's what should happen for consumers too albeit naturally at a much lower level of service. So say you sign up for "1 gig service" and it'll spell out you have 1 Gbps maximum bandwidth which is promised on average 67% of the time (16 hours a day), 125 Mbps guaranteed floor bandwidth (ie., 8:1 overprovision), 1 Mbps low latency bandwidth (which you could assign to a VoIP vlan say), maybe in some cases a burst capability (can go to 2.5 Gbps for 2 seconds per minute), and response for broken connections within 72 hours. Or whatever the numbers are for any service, but all spelled out, measurable by the customer, neutral to customer content, and directly comparable between services. Customers don't need to necessarily use all that or care, but if they do they can make sure the ISP is doing as promised, and the ISP can match its costs to what it charges in a clear way.

>This is like running an all-you-can-eat buffet and complaining when a fat guy shows up and eats you out of business. It's a flaw in the business model they CHOSE to implement.

Physical analogies are often bad when applied to tech.
I guess I don't know what's out there, but it feels like there must be a bunch of industrial-type loads that could be pretty flexible, and would absolutely benefit from a model where they get electricity for a fraction of the price with the promise that the utility can throttle them back by 80-90% at a second's notice.

Think stuff that's naturally storage-oriented, like charging forklift/AGV batteries, pumping something into a tank, boiling a large kettle, etc. These are all potentially loads where the convenience cost might be well worth a discount from the utility, where the discount is maybe proportional to how long the throttling can be— some loads you'd only want to lose a few minutes (so, basically buying the utility time to spin up another turbine), whereas others you could lose for hours at a time (actual load shifting).
It explicitly says in the second paragraph that a "virtual machine check" (presumably to stop examinees running the exam on VMs) is the cause of the issue. I think that makes the likelihood of them testing on cloud servers pretty low.

"Examplify, writes that 12th Gen Intel processors aren’t compatible with its software. “New Windows devices containing the Intel 12th generation chipset are triggering Examplify’s automatic virtual machine check,”"
Of course but if a game has malware the publisher would get insta ban from these platform.
Bitcoin is an authoritarian’s wet dream as evidenced by the libertarian philosophies of crypto bros and how Bitcoin and crypto have played out.

Showing authoritarian governments don’t like Bitcoin doesn’t help. Western conservatives and CCP’s social views are very similar. Yet they despise one another. Of course. Authoritarians want to be the ones in control. Why would they like other authoritarians?
Anime: Picture for Proof
Yeah it's definitely a bit peculiar. You'd think they could have done some more research into the makeup of the material they'd be processing, get a good understanding of the needs of the machinery...
The logical extrapolation from what you are saying is command economy / forced mass redistribution to wealth.

It's a great exercise to research the effects of this type thing historically.
No, I just understand how to make valid criticisms. First step before you can criticize is to understand what you're criticizing
"Housing is for living, not speculation"

-- good quote from a good leader
What I've heard is that you can't necessarily trust claims that "Star X is a lot bigger than Eta Carina"
power consumption
=================
Idle: 1.3 W
Normal: 4.8 W
Max: 20.0 W

Well this looks interesting for a NAS. Not cheap though at $ 459.00 for the most basic package.
From cpp reference: "Strict Aliasing: Given an object with effective type T1, using an lvalue expression (typically, dereferencing a pointer) of a different type T2 is undefined behavior, unless [non relevant exceptions omitted]".

In this case the expression has type bool and the underlying object has type int, so it is a straightforward strict aliasing violation.

With GCC you can compile with -fno-strict-aliasing to ignore this rule. But now you fall afoul of the rule that prevents accessing an invalid representation (i.e. a trap-representation) of an object. This rule is also described in the link I posted before, under the object representation paragraph.
DOS/65 – a operating system for 6502 CPU based systems
> solar takes up so much land that would be better used as farmland.

Agrivoltaics:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agrivoltaics
Okay, focus on just the first one then. How can you justify charging your kids more to share your Internet connection than your ISP charges for the whole thing? It seems immoral for parents to make a profit off of their kids, especially if the kids aren't financially able to move out yet.
That is a very cool website that I'd never seen before today. Thank you!
This is an oddly specific rumor. Also oddly entertaining.