skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Can't you just add "2", "3", etc. to the start or end of the URL?
There are MUJI locations in Boston, NY, and Portland. https://www.muji.us/pages/store-information
Yeah, when one is rich enough to own them.

Why spend money on basic infrastructure for human living conditions, lets give everyone air conditioning and an electric car.
Two packages: styled-components and es5-ext. Both print out console messages on .ru systems, neither one messes with the system’s files.
Here is an NPR article which shows that media coverage for Trump was less positive and more negative than for the 3 preceding presidents: https://www.npr.org/2017/10/02/555092743/study-news-coverage...

And you can trust them because they rightly recognize Biden as a historical president: https://www.npr.org/sections/president-biden-takes-office/20...

No matter how much you try and disparage the US press, for the most part the mainstream press are warriors for democracy and one of the reasons why US has such a healthy and vibrant democracy.
It's worse. Most academics don't even make their citations links, even though this is probably the most obvious use case ever for links. Instead, we get PDFs that really want to pretend they're paper journals, and citation formats that try to just infodump enough for you to go find the paper yourself.
Free school lunches have been available even during the pandemic. Schools were even given funds to deliver the meals to rural homes.
If I understand it correctly, two entangled qbits can can have their spin measured in the same order of planes (XY, YZ, XZ) to get the same result? So you can send a binary bit {0:no british, 1:british} or a qbit{XY:british probability, some other strategy dependent on XY spin and order of spin planes?}
The Curse of Konzo (2018)
We won't ever get anywhere close to a surplus as long as we don't have storage that would be buying up energy when supply exceeds demand.
This article is so strange - it's literally self contradiction.

It defines preening as the activity that is highly visible and appreciated by management - yet somehow it concludes that it isn't the thing that gets you promoted.

In my experience what gets you promoted is doing highly visible work, soft skills, sucking up to management and being at the right place at the right time, as well as aggressively asking for promotion - in short, presenting the best possible image in the eyes of people who decide who gets promoted.

If you quietly check in breakthrough features, fix up critical infrastructure, you might make/save the company a ton of money, but most middle management won't care, notice or understand your contributions.

And the final contradiction is at the end of the article - doing good technical work most likely won't earn you any externally convertible recognition, and thus is useless for furthering your career. Your new employer might not even ask about what exactly you did at your previous job, and if they do, nobody can distinguish genuine work from the tall tales everyone tells about themselves.
Nuclear is safer than wind, on par with solar[1]. Got a source that says otherwise?

https://ourworldindata.org/safest-sources-of-energy
Good question, had not thought about it. Yes it is. Although not more expensive than my total personal computing as I have multiple (too many) laptops.

-[Surface laptop 3 - 13" Intel -Windows]
-[Surface laptop 3 - AMD 15" - Ubuntu, daily driver]
-[Surface Pro X - ARM - 13"? ARM Dev]
-[Apple Macbook - Intel - 13" Mac OS]
-[ASUS ROG - Intel - 15" Gaming]
My previous team used to have ticket IDs on every commit but just decided to drop that requirement for commits that are truly self-contained and documented properly in the commit message.

That approach makes a lot of sense to me. Link the commit to the ticket when it enhances future reading, but not out of blind application of principle.
Just once. Drink bottled water when you go to these places. They are tropical islands covered in jungle trees where pumas swim between these islands, it's not that hard to realize why when you think about how water flows in a place where everything is trying to kill. It's terrifying until you realize all nature isn't disney.
IPhone 13 mini btw.
If I understood the article correctly, you could also change the property of one card and see the effect instantaneously in the other.
And if maintaining the diversity of human culture were actually the goal, that might matter. But it's not and it never has been. DEI has always been about creating a cultural, well, monoculture.
Quickly googling, 100M ladybugs seems like it would weigh almost 1000lbs. That's just the weight of the bugs: you'd need to package all that safely, and the sheer size would be equivalent to a public works project. The cost would be enormous and the time and resources needed to actually put them somewhere would be incredible.

It's not just improbable, it's impossible given the logistics and cost. I'd be surprised if you could even source 100M live ladybugs if you had the resources to buy and handle them.
You can also then find all the other bots that are attempting to poison the well with the same junk and shadow ban them all.
"And those categories can't be expanded just because some politicians and judges think it's a good idea."

Why not? Isn't that how the current ones came to be?

"But all we have to do is stop clicking and start to develop a cultural idea that it's wrong to report is a way that makes killers (in)famous."

That would be great, but what would that look like? I don't see a mechanism for incentizing them via culture. The only thing I can see is if people start sueing the media like they have gun makers for improper marketing.

"A lot of what we consider "gun control" is under active constitutional debate."

Is it really a lot? It seems the majority of gun control regulations still stand under the new one prong standard.
Beginner's guide to error handling in Rust
I think this Stanford course is aiming at a different goal than Harvard’s CS50. Harvard’s course seems to be aimed at people who are coders or want to be better at coding, so you learn about different languages, algorithms/data structures, SQL and such.

The Stanford course, especially the second half, appears to be more in the spirit of liberal arts. It covers high-level concepts in CS (server vs client, how does the internet work, what is encryption) that even someone who never writes code professionally will be able to use. They’ll be better able to read newspaper articles on tech topics, or perhaps more to the point, better equipped to be a PM/lawyer/BD in the tech space.
It's what LexisNexis / WestLaw have built their foundational businesses on - lots of $$$$. The new tech-infused player in this area is Casetext (YC13) which moved from a centralized employer-based sentiment model to a more social/open model.

edit: feel free to take a look at my oldest submissions.
then you need to remember for each domain which "version" are you at. imagine for 200 domains...
you need to remember all of them
Rajiv Gandhi’s wife Sonia and son Rahul are also major political figures in India.
This is astounding; I had no idea. Thank you for explaining the details. Do you have publicly citable sources for the information on the owning vs. leasing?
Two out of four (the first two) I started and stopped. Maybe I should persevere.

Sometimes (e.g. Kuhn) you feel like you've already read the thesis after 50 pages or so, and the rest is just repetition of it.
Where I was during a pandemic? Could have been many places.
Case in point, the death of Epstein.
IMVHO we need to stop pretending give numbers, especially in very short range to nature. Talking about a certain amount of temperature is like saying that today here there are 7h of sunlight so my p.v. should have produced a certain amount of energy and self-consumption should be better than the 5h of yesterday. Such numbers even if real they are meaningless because for instance in the above example yesterday there was less Sunny hours but those was continuous and fully sunny so far better for self-consumption than yesterday. Similarly at another scale it's meaningless talking about how many millimeters of rain hit a certain area per year, if they hit all in few weeks this area is not that nice respect of a dryer one but with regular alternation of sun and rain. Long story short instead of play with meaningless math let's try a more realistic path.

Today we have ONE energy production tech witch constant and not much pollutant in normal conditions, witch is nuclear fission. We can't improve it in less than 10 years IF and only IF is the public who do that at 100%, no private business involved (otherwise 20+ year if we ever arrive to something usable). In the meantime the less pollutant is methane. p.v. can do much in certain area and to use it for sure we need to erase the idea of tall buildings and apartments pushing people toward single-family modern homes (insulation, p.v. etc) with investments on energy saving (for instance big water heaters with classic resistance BUT also a heat-pump for non-sunny days, big enough to withstand a day or two without Sun and without energy need keeping water hot enough) and LOCAL smart MICRO-grid like wishing machines, dishwashers, ovens etc who can talk a simple modbus-alike protocol to talk to an inverter and decide how to run to maximize self-consumption for instance. Such kind of evolution is possible and far quicker than new nation-wide electricity grids and mega-projects.

In ten years we can have remote workers and retirees in such setup, witch might be not so much, but it's a thing. In others ten years others people have migrated, nuclear is fully on-line, renewable have replaced methane enough. Society is changed sufficiently to reduce the need of methane-made fertilizers, and agrobusiness was annihilated for the sake of humanity so we start to have less pollutant and more sustainable agriculture, a new western society is seeded. Others will adapt in another ten years. In 50 years we have done enough to survive the change without a world war and a mass genocide.
Citations take a lot of time already as it is. Any extra metadata would take a ton of time and for what? Just so some data nerds that wouldn’t read the paper anyway can play with it?
It comes down to practice, when I started to travel (after years of sitting on ass in office and just walking around city) and came to Great wall at Mutianyu, it took me like 40-60 minutes to get all the way uphill with many breaks. Then roughly two years later after travelling across Asia walking every day kilometres, when I went there with my father I could almost run all the way up in like 10-20 minutes.

I walked recently with my kids (4+6y) ~11km on some tourist trail (very small elevation), didn't really have problem during hike, but could feel it in my legs later for few days since I am not used to walk that much anymore, nowadays I walk like 5-6km per day only.

Btw. my father will be soon 70, he is hiking regularly, can do 20+ km through mountains in one day.

Oh and like maybe year ago I started simple exercise routine (like <10 minutes but all kinds of moves) at home, no equipment necessary besides floor and wall, at beginning I could barely do 1-2 push ups, now I moved to 15 at one session (+20 sit ups, +15 squats and various other moves with neck, hands), but long time didn't icnrease the number, I'm sure I could push it to 18-20, you just need to start slowly, at beginning even 2 are OK, after few weeks you move to 5, after few more weeks to 8-10, then you move to 15, etc.
Yes. You can trade options like this using pretty much any brokerage including E-Trade and Robinhood. TD Ameritrade, Fidelity, Charles Schwab, etc.

I'd steer you away from Robinhood, not just for the sake of the meme culture that's developed around it, but because other platforms generally have better research tools and support.

With all of that said, jumping straight into options trading is a big leap to take and with active investing in general I'd encourage you to look at it not as 'investing' but as gambling.

If you're doing it for fun that's all good just don't bet more than you can afford to lose.
I suppose I'll need to check it out, I am not on Twitter so don't frequent it.

At the same time... If twitter existed back then, how would the famed scientists and communicators come out? Einstein, Feynman, Asimov, Clarke have all had pretty damming (defined at minimum as "unacceptable by modern cultural standards") behaviour come to light. Respected scientists and philosophers of 70s who are still alive have similarly gotten themselves into serious hot water on social media more recently.

Never meet your heroes and all that...
Moreover, tadpoles don't just grow magically into full sized frogs. What are they eating? There's simply not enough biomass available in any location to support that many frogs growing to maturity and then keeping them alive.

Unless you've got 100M ladybugs, I guess.
This was a great read. I kept expecting it to reference the "Curse of Dimensionality" [1] as an explanation for why we see no close-to-average samples in high-dimensional spaces. I'm guessing the book this is an excerpt from might. In any case, I enjoyed this as a relatable instance of the concept!

[1]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curse_of_dimensionality
When you see this, this is almost always a management vs IT issue, and you're just suffering the fallout of it.

With this said, if the management demands IT has tickets, this is something that must be reiterated to every employee. "If you go to IT without a ticket, they cannot and will not help you"

While you as an employee may not have been adversarial, it is extremely common for angry users demand help right now for their life ending issue that's more important than anything else in the world! You know, they need that PDF printed right now... While you happen to be working on the server that's keeping 100 other people from working.
It is much more programming specific focused, but I still think my favorite intro to programming course ever is the original 1986 Structure & Interpretation [1].

[1] https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLE18841CABEA24090
The article lists four citations, not sure why you claim there are none?
If you're electing them, that's not a King. What you've got there is, maybe a Dictator of some sort depending on what happens when you try electing somebody else, but it's not a King (unless this is Star Wars for some reason).

The whole point of Monarchy is that you get random monarchs because of how sexual reproduction works. Short, stupid, clumsy, more or less everything is possible. England even had rules trying to pick boys to be the next monarch (these rules are no longer in effect for future generations) and because Mother Nature doesn't give a shit we got several Queens anyway. So elections have nothing to do with how somebody gets to be King.

Anyway, I think the role you're thinking about is Head of the Executive. You need a single human in this role for effective government, because the executive is responsible for immediate tactical responses and of necessity a democratic legislature cannot react fast enough or cohesively enough to serve this purpose.

It does you no good to give, say, Nancy Pelosi the status of "Commander in Chief" of your military forces, and then oblige her to hold a vote, subject to the whims of dozens or hundreds of people, on any directives for those forces. The Executive needs to make rapid tactical decisions and not be paralysed by conflicting political ambitions. This is also true for civil emergencies, nobody whose town was just destroyed by a volcano wants to hear about how due to procedural rules the emergency supplies won't arrive until Wednesday because a senator from another state wanted to make a broader point about gay marriage.
Links make the paper harder to read, and often you will not be able to use the links to directly access the source anyway.
I think people feel more confident making generalizations about novel religious groups, even relatively large ones. And maybe especially novel religious groups with centralized control. Unification Church is basically the same age as Scientology.
If you use money you're going to get scammed
pref64 is the generic term for a "NAT64 prefix".

The pull request helps advertise the NAT64 prefix via router advertisements (while DNS64 uses, well, DNS to advertise it).

The DNSSEC problem is known and has a solution: any stub resolver performing DNSSEC validation should also perform the DNS64 synthesis, should the network be running DNS64/NAT64. The support of DNS64 in stub resolvers is almost nonexistent though (as is the existence of DNSSEC-validating stub resolvers).
Dangling modifier here: I meant, "Also, when you are a small startup, they don't benefit from confiscating your profits through price discrimination."
I am now fairly sure we agree and I just didn't like your example.
Honestly right now it feels like the Liberal Party is completely asleep at the wheel and there's a total absence of leadership at the moment and lots of ministerial files seem completely unmanaged or poorly managed.

They were able to ride out the pandemic with some overall reasonable policies, and most of the stuff that annoyed people fell on the provinces.

But they're clearly having a hard time transitioning now, and the Singh giving them a blank check has made them extra complacent. The stuff at the airports on its own is inexcusable. ArriveCAN needs to go. They need to respond boldly to this Rogers fiasco from Friday. They feel entirely flat footed to me.

The expiration date is all over Trudeau and he needs to do the right thing and GTFO. And he needs to do it in a way that doesn't stiff Freeland and leave her in a Kim Campbell or Kathleen Wynne or Paul Martin type position.

He needs to announce his resignation ASAP and call a leadership convention even if it's a coronation for Freeland.

Singh I think has cost the NDP pretty much almost all their seats in the next election by propping Trudeau up right now. I have always voted NDP but I don't know what I'll do next time around.

I say this as a left wing voter who doesn't want to see the Conservatives in charge. But every day they hold on they're just giving the Conservatives more momentum, even without a leader.

I think when strategists look back they'll see Trudeau as a mistake. It got them power, but he was no Chretien or Trudeau Sr. He has been weak on policy and on leadership. And it will cost them in the long run. They blew their 3 gov'ts by basically getting almost nothing actually done on all their files they were so boldly proclaiming. It reminds me a lot of McGuinty's term: at the end most of the problems created by Mike Harris still hadn't been reversed. I feel the same way about this gov't and the Harper years.

CO2 Emissions? Up. A lot. Indigenous reconciliation? Nope. Clean water to all reserves? Nope. And what they have accomplished (small carbon taxes, subsidized daycare) seems very vulnerable to immediate reversal on day one of a conservative gov't.
Really? I challenge you to find any items other than 7 and perhaps 8 that don't apply to the types of development you mention.

Essentially the only thing that's different with the types of development you mention is that "final deployment to production" looks different, as it usually involves more or less physically transporting artifacts to your customer.

But the rest is just the same. You should be doing trunk-based development, practise something like code review, gate on integration tests, feature flag, spin up virtual production clones, etc.

In other words, the fact that getting software to your end users is a clumsy process does not preclude you from doing every other step of the process with short feedback loops.
Sounds dangerous, but whatever keeps you moving.
New Arizona law makes it illegal to film within 8 feet of police
>Tesla could make an open API at just let whoever capture the profits.

Presumably this is supposed to be different from what I said (sharing profits), so are you suggesting the service provider should take 0%?

>Then owners could group together on their own terms to get market power.

Thats precisely the part consumers don't want to do (and where Tesla can add value): aggregation and Autobidder.
As someone currently growing more cucumbers than I can handle (gardener problems), I've been eating at least 2 a day of a few different varieties, including a somewhat bitter pickling variety.

That said, I've never experienced the burping side effect many report. Makes me very curious what's going on metabolically to cause some to burp but not others. Can gas produced by the microbiome of the upper tracts of the intensities make it back up into ones stomach?? All very fascinating regardless.
First an foremost it says that "the search engine economy" is f...ed up.
Populations will not accept limitations on energy availability, no matter what goal is lauded. Look at Sri Lanka: the president fled and the people took over his opulent home. This will happen everywhere given enough pressure.

All artificial energy restriction scams are doomed to fail for this very reason. They will all usher in even lower-trust societies than exist now.
You're right that there are still thousands of examples of objects with identity and personality in all forms of modern art and design.

You're also right that modern design and architecture are shaped by changing missions, goals and standards (as well as changing fashions, material science, economic concerns, and maintenance and energy considerations since the 16th Century).

I don't think that was the twitter author's point, though. (I was quoting the author in the parent — it wasn't “my argument”.) They didn't say, “we should over-engineer structures even though material science has improved to the point that we no longer need to” or, “we should embellish things excessively even if the budget might be better allocated elsewhere”. They simply claimed that detail is linked to identity and personality; when there is less diverse detail in modern design there will be less diverse identity and personality.

This seems fair to me and it's easy to corroborate. Popular logos have converged around inoffensive icon + sans-serif font. New buildings are typically homogeneous unadorned concrete/steel boxes or glass towers or some mix of both. Popular hardware has converged toward a minimal glass slab. Sales websites feel like cookie-cutter versions of each other. These objects can all still be beautiful, but they can also lack personality.

The subtext in the author's thread was that it doesn't need to be this way. It is possible to meet modern goals and standards and also design to a budget, but be braver (the active, big-M Minimalism rather than the more cowardly small-m version). You can build “minimal” things that have details, identities and personalities. For example, Teenage Engineering[1] and Zaha Hadid's architectural firm[2] both inject their designs with detail and personality while following a minimalist/modernist style. This elevates them from the glass slab/box world of some of their peers, and it makes the products and environments more interesting to use and live in.

[1]: https://teenage.engineering/

[2]: https://www.re-thinkingthefuture.com/top-architects/a295-30-...
Heat can be separated and stored alongside (or used separately, if you happen to have an application for the heat). Modern compressed gas storage installations that don't just dump the heat to the environment are approaching the round trip efficiency of pumped storage (water), and unlike pumped storage they can basically be built wherever you want.
>This is an absurd assertion

Wow thanks for the thorough refutation! I have now realized my error and totally changed my mind!

>Also you’re literally quoting “Thank you for smoking” with your follow up defense.

So your idea of a refutation is to reference a fictional novel? I'm at a loss for words.