skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I do not agree. Take the example in football, Maradona was one of the greatest players, but he was unable to teach and to be conscious about how he did what he did.

Having a talent to solve problems does not mean you can teach them. Many times the opposite is true, people that do not have great talent but a good self reflecting and observing and analysis capacity can extract the insights and general rules of a give discipline.

The former plus a good experience on the field is best source o advice, and to my knowledge Uncle bob have both.
The problem is not the joke, the problem is persistence of hate towards Bitcoin from people in the tech community. I guess tech-bros are non-likeable to most people as well.
We can state with certainty that the number of comments is monotonically increasing.
Exactly my point. Trying to whitewash this with "need to do business" isn't helping your arguments. Some tried to use same ones for doing business with Nazis during WWII. They very much don't like when anyone reminds about it today.

Same will be for anyone who is doing business with Putin's fascists today.
> This is bad for consumers and Uber, but good for taxi operators.

Uber's biggest lie is that these are the only stakeholders in the equation.
> puts non-human life above human life

Well my pet has EU passport unlike my friend from Macedonia.
Unless they've tampered with their submissions history[1], I only see at most two submissions for the same blog post, one day apart. Would I be OK with someone posting the same link over and over half a dozen time, no, but a single retry sounds fair to me.

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=rkwz
It can amount to financial fraud (or at least incompetence), shoddy engineering, adverse and inefficient selection for graduate and post-graduate studies, and so forth.
There are people who have snuck chess computers into over the board tournaments as well, or used signaling from someone who had one.
> What, exactly, were Sri Lanka’s leaders thinking? Why did they engage in such a radical experiment?

It's that the end of the article or is this behind a paywall? I'm not saying anything else after that on the page
Agreed, such withdrawal would be a bit weird. Also note this warning on the top of the page:

> Be careful, this realtime graph is not always correct (especially the last hour)!
How cargo-quickinstall works – pre-compiled binary packages for `cargo install`
If it's anything like the in-person discussions I've seen on the matter it's not productive. I'm firmly polarised on one side and was happy to sit in the sidelines and not say anything on the matter in case I also got punched :(
This article [1] is a bit more informative on the history and soap-opera dynastic schism.

I don't have firsthand knowledge of it all, but I do know some ex-Moonies who've spoken of their efforts to safely detach their still-adherent relatives.

1. https://washingtoncitypaper.com/article/530522/lengthy-lawsu...
Yes, it is not really predictable. There are certain food that is worse like pop-corn but we can not say that a certain group of foods trigger it.
what does this have to do with OP's post?

Also, your question is far more complex and not comparable to the russo-ukraine war.

For one, the geo-political situation prior to WW2 and especially compared to today might aswell be from a completely different planet. Prior to world war 2, a intranational political union like the EU did not exist, not to mention most countries in europe weren't democracies at the time.
I don't think that's a radio, just an antenna amplifier. I'm not seeing where demodulation would happen. Some values seem kinda weird to me, like R4 on top of the cascode seems sorta high for something that oughta have a lot of bandwidth (and the way L2+C6 are drawn is odd). Likewise 390k on the emitter of Tr3, seems like very little room for bias for something that's supposed to drive 50 ohms. Bandwidth at the input looks to be <2 MHz, so maybe it's meant for AM broadcast or 160m.
I read that in Cletus' accent.
Re-read the oversight. It's based on transparency and governance. There aren't people doing the oversight, beyond handling complaints and shutting down non-compliant schools.

The oversight is:

- Non-profit, with proper board governance

- Comply with all relevant transparency laws (public records, FERPA, PPRA, etc.)

- Fair lottery; schools cannot pick-and-choose students who go there

- Some amount of standard data reporting

- Charters can't charge beyond the voucher amount

There is no proposed oversight of what's taught or how it's taught.

That's basically how charters work in Massachusetts, where they blow away one of the best public education systems in th world.
I think we're saying the same thing. I wasn't suggesting any of these approaches offered some loophole that replicated FM, but that these manufacturers decided there's enough synthesis techniques that come close in sound that they opted to do so rather than pay Yamaha, as some other manufacturers did at the time.

Even if the underlying algorithms are nothing like FM if you get similar sounds (the gritty, busy waveforms) it made a lot of sense to market it and dilute the appeal of "FM" as THE digital synthesis method of the 1980s, as the DX7 nearly did.

I also wouldn't loop in wavetables with these approaches.
> if they were dodging taxes with their "no credit cards" policies.

Bingo.
You forgot the metabolic cycles of the signalling molecules and their receptor proteins, as well as the ion pumps important for those reactions. I think that is really what the professor was going for. Also, perhaps, some [partial] description of the learning process as it impacts a single neuron.
Of course, given qualified immunity, there's nothing to actually prevent cops from acting like they don't know that clause exists.
It’s not bad at all. Companies forced this by not rewarding people who stay.
It's true, there are district heating systems using subterranean seasonal sensible heat storage accessed through heat pumps, like Drake Landing. I wonder if the tighter temperature precision requirements of efficient adiabatic CAES would make it difficult — such a reservoir necessarily has enormous thermal mass, and if its temperature has to remain essentially constant during operation you must store vastly more energy in it than the "tidal volume" of heat during a yearly cycle. But maybe you can avoid such a requirement by clever enough engineering using several such reservoirs or a continuum of them (like packed-bed heat exchange media).
I think it’s an “I am miserable so let’s make other people miserable” thing.
So... the UK?
That’s a neutral treatment then. (I’m a biochemist, and I see no reason why a similar system couldn’t apply to my field.)
> this is dangerously close to saying you don't need privacy if you have nothing to hide.

We empower police to harass, detain, and use deadly force against the public.

This power has to be counterbalanced by accountability. If the way they use that power cannot stand up against public scrutiny, then they shouldn't have it.

> but we need to let them do their jobs without villainizing everything they do.

We wouldn't do that if they didn't so consistently fail at doing their jobs, or at being held accountable for those failures.
Have you been paying attention to what SpaceX is doing with Starship?

Things are developing far faster than you think.
Why does asphalt look brighter on American highways?
Two days ago the German government voted to to shut off the three remaining nuclear power plants. https://www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/klima-nachhaltigkeit/...
Heck, there is an entire spectrum of politics which state that pocketing excess value from the productions of others is wage-theft and thus exploitative.
> claims that the assassination of JFK in the United States in 1963 changed official US government policy are nonsense

Seriously? The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 was passed entirely on JFK's death. I'd say that's…pretty major.
> Is that controversial?

No, of course not. These people aren't arguing in good faith.
And yet time and time again, chess streamers and content producers run across people with newly formed accounts and perfect win records playing the best engine move at regular measured intervals.

If you are cunning enough to hold off on the best move for a few extra seconds to appear unaided by an engine, or if you blunder X% moves in your game (or simply play the 3rd or 4th rated move which still probably wins against most humans), chances are you'd do fine learning some chess strategy and playing the game unaided.

People keep asking why one would cheat at chess. I'm sure there are some bad actors who aim to disrupt the game, in a manner consistent with cheater motivations in other games. I'd imagine many cheaters are simply looking for some quick dopamine after being frustrated by a plateau in their skill.
> I dumped an ex-gf because she was going to be a doctor and that's not the life I wanted for my family.

Lol, out of curiosity, what does this mean?
The default seems to be to store the sanitized dump on S3.

It’s not always available in a professional context. Or might be considered extraction.

Keeping everything local and detailing exactly what goes where and how would be helpful.
Well, what was the alternative during WWII? Defeating Nazi Germany for instance. Which is what happened. But surely not doing business with it during the war, that's self explanatory.
Yeah most of the time I do that but it's not always practical. For one thing what about if there are police on both sides? Yes that happens.
how can you cheat on chess?
Redshift also occurs to light emitted from within a gravity well. Obviously that isn't what's happening at a cosmic scale (our light isn't blueshifted to other observers) but it's at least conceivable that some third phenomenon could be the cause.
... or record from 10 feet away.
Trolling, it appears; see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32046022
> This fantasy of forcing musk to buy the company doesn’t exist in any contract.

That is precisely what the merger agreement is: a contract forcing Musk to buy Twitter.
I am honestly shocked at the number of comments strongly asserting the impossibility of FTL based on simultaneity arguments from special relativity. Yes, faster than light travel through space is prohibited in both special and general relativity by simultaneity. But not so for sub light speed travel (or even being stationary) on a space which itself has the property where distances between the passenger and destination are decreasing faster than the speed of light, which is precisely the class of metric solutions that the paper is investigating.

The fact that certain galaxies are receding from us faster than the speed of light due to the expansion of the universe (again just changes in the metric) provides a clear example of this kind of 'FTL' travel that is permitted in general relativity.
This is probably made worse when the religious folks talk the talk but don’t walk the walk. The next generation sees the hypocrisy and moves on.
I'm disappointed to see this merger of art and engineering received so poorly here.

This pushes the envelope of the possible, something I consider beautiful. It's roughly as impractical, expensive, and awkward looking, as a human-propelled airplane.

I don't think any of the many commenters here who panned this watch would have anything bad to say about a human-propelled airplane. It's a pity that they can't appreciate this object in that spirit.
> That's 85% of the future generation of US senators [...]

That is false. Many young people who are material for such position, don't care about tiktok.
I’m not talking about communism, I’m talking mostly about diversity and inclusion stuff.

But yes, you could apply the same to communism: just because a lot of people are saying stupid things about communism doesn’t mean that communism is bad. Communism could be bad or good, but it should be judged on the merits of its strongest conception.

And I really don’t think steelmanning arguments is a slippery slope: if anything it’s an uphill battle that requires constant effort.

My comment shouldn’t be intrepreted as serving as a shield against criticism, it should be interpreted as motivating a larger degree of good faith effort at the personal level.
I think I'd prefer a code review discussion where the file being modified is a CSV file listing everyone in the organization's roles, seniority levels, and compensation, and where anyone in the company (and perhaps at a later date, outsiders) can comment on and view the discussion and file history -- both while the promotion review is in progress and after the fact.

(perhaps the inputs to the promotion suggestion could be from a documented and equally-open algorithm; I still think it'd be nice to have the results reviewed and discussed (openly, by humans) before they take effect so that potential unfairness -- either in the levelling, or in the algorithm -- could be addressed)
There are cartridges for the VIC-20 and C64, made by Commodore, called, "Super Expander", which adds graphics and sound commands to BASIC. The VIC-20 model also adds 3KB of RAM.

Another option is Simons' BASIC which adds graphics, sound and lots of other commands to BASIC on the C64.
One feature I’d love to see is a transformer that instead of providing a random value provides a cryptographic one way hash of the data (ie sha2) - that way key uniqueness stays the same (to avoid unique constraints on columns) and also the same value used in one place will match another value in another table after transformation which more accurately reflects the “shape” of the data.
Oh believe me, it got panned in the industry for its absurdity.
Strawpoll literally any sample of people in the world if they've heard of VoA, indeed, have ever listened to the radio. Now do the same for TikTok…

You could maybe make a better case for something like Western cultural exports like music and movies. e.g. Like The Beatles with impressive centralised data gathering. Marvel movies, but more addictive.
This is the case for many other european countries aswell.

In the netherlands for instance, uber and many others got slapped down hard for circumventing the law according to the literal implementation of the law, instead of taking into account the spirit of the law aswell.
> Postgres 14 is supposed to have built-in connection pooling.

Any references on this? I see a note somewhere about better connection handling, but nothing that would remove the need for connection pooling.
A short video from Dubai Airshow 2021

Inside the UAC Irkut MC-21 and Luxury Sukhoi Business Jet SSJ100

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=miOaqcvbT30

At the Dubai Airshow 2021, I visited the Irkut MC-21. This is the MC-21’s International debut. Check out the airframe, cabin, cockpit and testing station. I interviewed an engineer onboard the MC-21, who revealed that the MC-21 will be entering service in 2022 with Rossiya Airlines. The modern MC-21 cabin resembles that of an Airbus 320 or a Boeing 737. Can the new MC-21 be a serious challenge to the narrow body market dominated by Airbus/Boeing?
A random delay is also a tell, though. An obvious move shouldn't take 15 seconds, but if that's what the random delay for that move is, that looks suspicious. A more difficult move shouldn't take only 3 seconds, but if that's what the random delay for that move is, that also looks suspicious.
>This won’t work in positions where you’re expected to work with ambiguity

Does that leave any positions for which it would work?
> Sure, you can get great results despite paying the mental cost of collaborating

When I refer to the beneficial kind of collaboration, I’m referring to the kind where the cost of not collaborating is to not achieve the outcome at all.

Paul McCartney is an excellent musician on his own. The Beatles achieved something as a group that no individual can achieve on their own.

I agree that adding collaboration in a setting that doesn’t require it just adds mental cost. But in other settings, that mental cost is minimal compared to the enhanced output.

> Creating more artificial collaboration when you're capable of doing the task by yourself will just be expensive

We’re on the same page here. That’s what I mean by “Collaboration” in quotes. The kind that is not necessary.

My main point/issue is that the article doesn’t seem to really acknowledge or explore that there is a good/bad kind. Just focusing on “employees need more time to do their actual work” is not useful if that employee’s actual work actually does require some form of collaboration.

The ability to distinguish between the two seems to be the core issue that requires exploration.
My experience: Collaborating closely with smart people makes you happy. It can be so exhilarating - in a sustained way for a long time, if you're lucky and the universe aligns correctly.

And yes, frequent interruptions are okay in this context. You get into a rhythm.
>most AI people acknowledge that the timeline for AGI is unknown and that it will most likely involve yet to be discovered algorithms, not just throwing more data/processing power at it.

Try telling that to Sutskever or Karpathy (or indeed a bunch of "rationalists" on twitter, at least a subset of which works in AI) because both of them have made the claim you assert you haven't seen.
> remind me of the folks who said that Texas power blackouts last year were because we had too much wind and solar. It's a slice of truth

Is it really a slice of truth, or a convenient lie? Quoting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Texas_power_crisis :

"State officials including Republican governor Greg Abbott[13] initially blamed[14] the outages on frozen wind turbines and solar panels. However, data showed that failure to winterize power sources, primarily those of natural gas, had caused the grid failure"

citing, among others, "Republicans use Texas power outages to spread false claims about green energy" at https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/republicans-texas-power-outa...
Most likely, things don't go that far. Prosecutors don't want to take losing cases. There are no high-stakes consequences, as there ought to be, but it also doesn't look good for anyone involved.

Your bigger picture, though, is smack-on. By the time you hit the legal system -- criminal or civil -- you've already lost. A typical case will bankrupt most people in the US. Thing is, one can always come up with an excuse to sue / prosecute someone. There's a deeper problem there which this law doesn't change.

I'd rather address root causes.
You can do the math and find an approximation of the price–demand relation ship ( assuming you adapt prices to keep your business profitable, and users react by adapting demand).

This system has two fix points, one at the normal taxi price and much much lower. Point is , the second fix point needs the majority of the population to stop using a privat car…
Maybe I am wrong, but I understand this as if you're the person being questioned, arrested, etc then you can't legally record what's happening. If you record something illegally, is it admissible?
Chinese checkers is an existing game that uses a triangle grid. Surprised the article didn’t mention that.
That's a strange question, as several big chunks of Europe were allied with Germany at various points after WWII started (and others remained neutral).
Using a chess engine to pick your moves.
Site's a bit of a turn off in several ways:
https://superhuman.com/
Still, guess I might give it shot...
One good reason to not do this is it's std::error::Error, but there is no corresponding core::error::Error. no_std needs to be able to use Result too.
This is a very cynical and opportunistic way to do science. It may be the winning strategy to play the academic game and advance your career, though.
I genuinely don't know any drug addict who thinks taking drugs is a good thing, beneficial to them or in anyway a positive aspect of their life.

Please don't make up phony exaggerations just to win an Internet argument.
Run a chess solver, feed it enemy moves, use it's moves to play.
Can you connect the dots for me here? How is race/gender/sexuality related here?
> There's also the fact that a CC is accredited

One wonders if the accreditation agencies are neutral, or if they're going to say "well, you're not a real school, so we're not going to accredit you."
> What do you call it when you assign a value of one type to a variable of another type and the language creates a new value, different from the one you were assigning, and stores that new value in the variable? In C++ this is called "implicit conversion."

Right, I addressed this when I said:

> unless you consider "assigning a concrete value to an interface" to be an "implicit conversion", but Java does this too

So let's just skip to your reply to that bit:

> I guess, but this is much less of a conversion than Go is performing because the runtime value does not change at all. It's the same pointer, not a tuple containing the pointer. Unlike in Go, this assignment may very often be correctly implemented by a sequence of 0 instructions!

Yes, Java and Go have different implementations/conceptions of "interface". I don't see what bearing this has. From the programmer's perspective, Java's interface assignment isn't more explicit than Go's even though the underlying mechanisms differ. In particular, Go needs to create a new "header" value because its interfaces are polymorphic across any type (including primitives and value types!) whereas Java's are polymorphic only across objects and Java attaches a header to every object.

> Importantly, the meaning of "foo == null" is unchanged.

Go's `foo == nil` isn't changed either. It behaves like it does for all reference types. The difference between Java and Go is conceptual, but the `==` operator is coherent within each of them.

> This is not because Java performs implicit conversions of interface types to specific pointer types at the null check.

Agreed, and to be clear, I didn't claim it did. Nor does Go, so I'm not quite sure what you're responding to here.

> It's because in Java interfaces are unable to express having a concrete value of a specific class which is null, because they are just pointers.

> One might say "Java interfaces do not have inner and outer nil values" as a shorthand for this.

Right, but we were debating whether or not Go interfaces have inner or outer nils. Consider `var x interface{} = 0`. What's the outer value? And what's the inner value? The whole point of my comment is that you're conceiving of Go interfaces as having inner and outer values, but Go interfaces are just a fat pointer. As such, you can have pointers to pointers with Go interfaces. And while you can't have pointers to pointers with Java interfaces, you can elsewhere in Java so a Java programmer should be able to reason about Go interfaces because they can understand the concept of a nullable pointer to a nullable pointer.

Ultimately, it seems that you're criticizing Go for having a different interface mechanism than Java, and you get bugs when you treat Go interfaces like Java interfaces. And Go made the right choice here, because it can express polymorphism over a wider range of types than just objects (contra Java interfaces) and indeed it doesn't have any sort of object/primitive bifurcation--from the perspective of Go interfaces, all concrete types are just data.
At least in the US, contemporary design culture (or at least cherry picked, extreme examples of it) is weaponized by the far right as a way of leveraging traditionalism as ideal and progressivism, secularism as nihilistic and degenerative.

It's also a convenient way to say "cities = bad, country = good" which is convenient because minority groups historically congregate in cities and the countryside is predominately white.

Really the problem is rooted in late neoliberal capitalism not our bipartisan politics
This seems manifestly unconstitutional. How long will this survive a 1A challenge?