skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The issue generally isn't with the bill but how the police enforce it. There are videos all over the internet of police officers telling people standing near to stop filming them and threatening to arrest them for interferring with police business. Hell, there is one video of a police office crossing the road to do so.
After learning programming, practicing with leetcode is a good way to learn Computer Science. It will cover Algorithms, System Design and Databases.
Our certified pre-owned GMC Acadia spent two months in the dealership. They needed a special tool to fix an emissions issue. GM said it would take 6 months to get the tool, so the dealership ordered one on eBay. They gave us a rental car the whole time, and even swapped it out for a premium trimmed GMC Terrain when we went on a family road trip.

The dealership had previously repaired the moon roof, and inadvertently damaged the headliner. So, while working on the emissions issue they replaced the whole headliner. The replacement is a little cheesier than from the factory, but good enough.

There's still an exterior rattle that they claimed they fixed 3 times now. At least they're trying. Last time I took it in, they removed several trim pieces and drove it around. I'm just going to have to track it down myself I guess.

I bought a new Mustang in 2010, and paid for the 5 year extended service plan. The hood paint corroded and the dealership repainted it, and gave me a rental car for the week. The hood has since corroded again and it's out of warranty now. I am mulling over splurging on a new paint job, with a classic Mustang racing stripe.

Buying the Mustang, I went to three dealerships. The first one, I got a test drive, and then the salesmen just walked away. I think he assumed I wasn't serious when I said I was buying a car that day. The second dealership, the salesman was super sleazy and pushy, and so I walked away. The third dealership, the salesman was really relaxed and professional. He asked if I was financing, and when I said no, he said he didn't like to waste time haggling and was happy just to move inventory. He offered me a price just $200 above the friends-and-family x-code price.
Didn't realize Johny Ive found his way to Ferrari ;-)
you need to reexamine your values.

To even suggest that Noise pollution suffered by police is more important than even 1 person. getting shot is incredible.

To suggest that when 2500 people are shot annyally is simply breathtaking.

UK police kills 0 - 2 people a year, you have more people in prison than Russia and China combined, and you think you *Don't* have a problem?
This is not for people who work for a living.

It’s also probably not for people who gained their fortune via their own intelligence.
What about RDS Proxy? I believe it's still only supports 13 which means if you use both the Proxy and Aurora you will have to wait? RDS Proxy does still mention only support for v13[1].

[1] https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/AuroraUserGuide...
Thought the same! Scale includes everything from a minor AC fault through to entire building burning to the ground.
Yes, "in cryptocurrency" in general it can exist. But in a particular project, such as Ethereum or Bitcoin, it doesn't because the initial people can only sell their tokens once. They don't also exert additional disproportionate influence after they've sold all their tokens, unless they also have shares. And the whole point is to move to 100% tokens and 0% shares.
Be careful ... its hard to become the embodiment of the thing you hate. Running an ISP can be rough on your reputation :)
This is strange take. Yes, there were several reasons why the country got into financial difficulties, however the decision to switch from nitrogen fertilizer to organic one was clearly predictable to cause even more problems.

More than a century ago people feared Malthusian catastrophe, that food crops won't be able to feed growing global population. What saved us was the invention of Haber-Bosch process, chemical synthesis of nitrogen fertilizer from air nitrogen.

If globally there was enough organic fertilizer available, we would have never need for synthesized nitrogen fertilizer. That's not the case however. Fertilizer costs money but if you wanted to switch 100% to organic fertilizer, due to global shortage it would cost even more. The problem with toxic deliveries of Chinese organic fertilizer were fully predictable – if they offered to sell it for prices that were too good to be true, then most surely they were.

The economics with inorganic fertilizer is simple: you buy it for X dollars and then you get crops that you can sell for Y dollars where Y > X. Save X dollars by not buying the fertilizer and lose Y dollars.

By switching to organic fertilizer you would have to spend Z dollars where Z > X. How can it be a reasonable advice? It is the same as saying: if you right now cannot afford high gas prices, buy an electric car. Obviously, a person who cannot even afford to pay for gas clearly cannot afford to buy more costly electric car.
Show HN: A USB-Rubber-Ducky Blocker (Clarified)
Any historians able to provide color on the social context behind "The Emperor's New Clothes" and their contemporary relevance?
A commercial license, yes.

Source: https://www.travelweekly.com/Robert-Silk/How-1500-hour-rule-...
I suppose that only completely newbie cheaters would think of taking the same amount of time to make each move. It’s like the first rule of pretending to be a human: add a random delay to all of your actions.
I never read the new yorker before so I don't know if it was better before, but the few articles I've read seem almost like satire. It's like they're not real people, or at least they've never had the problems real people have had.

I like the economist though. Finance and economics are unpredictable. The things that caused recessions in past might not even register in the future. They at least have a coherent and workable worldview.
> The second is that there hasn't historically been a reward for doing dumb things someone sees on TV

Jackass.

Sorry, i don’t mean that as an insult. I’m just pointing out a counter example to your claim.
> Not lichess, but Alireza Firouzja (World Rank #3) was banned from chess.com when he was younger.

This has turned into a bit of an urban legend. The automated system flagged him based on both his rapid rise in rating and reports from several verified titled players.

On inspection by a human, he was cleared.

Danny exaggerates when he tells the story cause it's a funny anecdote.

This was also a very old version of the anti-cheat like you mentioned. Personally, part of the reason I prefer chess.com is their much better cheat detection than Lichess.
We already have laws for that. You can arrest them.
From an individual cell, there are three movements available. But there are two kinds of cell - north pointing and south pointing - and the set of three directions you can move in from each is different.

From a north-pointing triangle, you can move south, northwest or northeast. From a south-pointing triangle, you can move north, southwest or southeast.

So across the grid as a whole, six movement directions exist.
I know there's a slippery slope or potentential for abuse here.

But in its present form, it seems downright reasonable. Doesn't activate my outrage.
Sometimes, people will be suitable candidates, and sometimes they won’t. In the cases they aren’t, we’d just have to accept that this will slow down the development of the medication.
1888 is the year that, when written in Roman numerals, has the most digits (so far). But it’s probably just to make it seem more of a bargain than $1,999,000.
So don't collide with a train?

https://youtu.be/OA8dNFiVaF0
So effectively they couldn't be made just anywhere, if they can't be made in the US?
I would suspect the cost would go up if accredited. So, maybe an early adopter discount in some cases if not this one.
GPT-3 wrote a paper on itself, researcher hopes she didn't open 'Pandora's box'
"As long as healthcare systems are not being overwhelmed, there is no rationale for any further restrictions." - I'd express that as "as long as healthcare systems aren't at risk of becoming overwhelmed, there's no rationale for high- cost restrictions".
I wouldn't consider mask wearing mandates and vaccination requirements as "high cost".
I'd love it if we could just rely on folks to "do the right thing" but when it requires a significant percentage of the population to maintain particular preventative behaviours for them to be effective, mandates really are the only option. OTOH, testing/isolation is better off left as a strong recommendation, as mandating isolation does come with high costs, where the pros often don't outweigh the cons.
>> the "idea" they can break the law too.

There may be a disconnect here for those who are not Swiss. That very "idea" is arguably detrimental to the social health of a country like Switzerland (whose citizens appear to practice a sort of honor system when it comes to social norms and laws), while it may well be a non-issue in most other countries.

I think a global company like Uber will have a social impact, whether positive or negative, that very much reflects specific regions or nations, so white knighting Uber as a general proposition is not very sound.
There is the chance the computational model is wrong.
So Uber much like Tesla forced incumbent companies to innovate and you as a consumer have benefited, yes?
If we use the analogy of physical stationery and forms, each one serves a specific, tailor made purpose. A tax form, daily journal form, double entry accounting form, an invoice, etc. are specifically designed for that purpose. You could technically use a blank page as a starting point to make any kind of form you need, but straight up blank pages are not very efficient outside of personal home use.

Notion and its brethen, AirTable, etc. are just pain in the ass to set up. They're infinitely customizeable and that's a bug, not a feature IMO.

I'll take a proper CRM or a Wiki tool over a blank slate.
That might be a perspective, but it feels weird to say it the way Kissinger does if it doesn’t elude to something deeper.

For example: There could be war between Finland and Sweden, but it’s fair to call them allies, in this day and age, they are friends… friends can still fall out. I know he says permanent friends, but permanence in friendship is simply the act of not sabotaging it.

In the same way it might be fair to call the US and Canada allies, but given that the US has been considerably more hostile to the EU, even spying on politicians, I think the quote is more telling than you believe.
Playing people who take 10 seconds every move— whether an obvious “only move” or the most complicated situations… and that pick the move that stockfish makes almost all of the time… are cheating.
Can you be more specific?
The storage graph look relatively flat to me. Interactive graph: https://agsi.gie.eu/graphs/eu
Smooth folding phones, foxy ultraflat watches, I honestly don't know what radiant beauty is next.

The future isn't limping along in the fog, is it?

My blind eyes already paid the price for that video, nobody else has to.

So, anyways, what's the topic today? Italian design?
Arduino and Wiring? Arduino is an inspiring beginner electronics kit, and one of the first. Innovative design.

Maybe open the user immediately into a tutorial project when they open the IDE? It's that Apple unboxing experience, right? You want to reduce the friction, reduce the time between when they open it, and their eyes light up at the blinking lights.

Arduino online stores with code-signed projects? The newer Arduinos have WiFi, but I don't know how the browsing experience is in the IDE lately.

I'm stuck in the CLI, trying to enjoy it again, hoping I don't cause too much pain to users. Which is a messed up mindset in some ways.
I’m hiring for a Flutter and BLE job right now. Couldn’t possibly care less about accreditation and far from an HN-typical.

We’re out there. Really doesn’t matter on the specific job, all I care is, can you do it, and will you be a distraction?
Ahh you’re right - it’s hazards that flash, it’s not the brake lights.

OT: I was wondering if you were gordonjcp of scotlug fame (i don’t expect you’d remember me, i used to attend / was briefly active circa 2002-2004) but the mention of Citroen sealed it :-) hope you’re well!
You don't, until you meet up and compare notes.
Huh, a single guy having all the power and changing the fundamental rules of the game (aka constitution or however it's called in China)? Not a red flag?
Saving the life of an animal over a human is murder.
I think this is a good anecdote that reiterates the kind of “collaboration” the article is talking about, but is not the “real” collaboration people strive for.

The reason group projects in school felt so terrible was because the end goal was collaboration, not some higher outcome. Collaboration can unlock outcomes that can’t be achieved as an individual, but collaboration can’t be the desired end state.
Collaboration has its place for when you need it. Sure, you can get great results despite paying the mental cost of collaborating (which is even higher if it's happening through a computer screen).

The problem is that we see the great results of occasional collaboration and we want more of that. Creating more artificial collaboration when you're capable of doing the task by yourself will just be expensive (both in terms of salary and mental health): it's not the answer.
I think the description in the man entry is better than the one in the README. Other than that, cool tool!
We have a database with a few TB of data. We can create an aurora clone in around 10 mins give or take, but what we’ve found is that this the clone loads data in lazily as needed. Meaning the first time you hit a given table in a query it can be very slow. Afterwards it works well though
The animal and human trials don't always go well either.

You only hear about the human trials that go wrong.
The shorts browser UI is a clone of the tiktok UI. I don't really like either, they could have innovated at least a little by introducing more powerful video controls like the seeking shortkeys that work on youtube for example.

But it wasn't built to appeal me (or you), but other parts of the population, people who prefer tiktok like experiences.

For me personally, the reason to use shorts every now and then is because tiktok is authwalled while shorts is not. But I don't know what other users of shorts would say why they prefer it.
Many are using these alternatives. For example, a computer model for cardiotoxicity has higher accuracy than animal models.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28955244/

It's an educational process. A lot of folk just go along with the status quo and feel there's no alternative to animal research.
Stacked on top of each other, that’s less than a foot.
You're looking at the flow and not the storage quantity on that chart.
I find a lot of beginners have this mentality and skip over analyzing games they win to their detriment.

In general, the way to get better at chess, or anything really, is all about intentionality.

I'd recommend reviewing every game, win or loss, and looking for things you missed, what your opponent missed, thinking about what your opponent was thinking, why did they play the moves they did, etc.
Copyright shouldn't be a consideration for the press. Not when dealing with newsworthy items, anyway. When it comes to public resources and government, I see no reason to not just link the real thing. Instead I see outlets like Vox post articles titled, "Biden's executive order on abortion, briefly explained" and so on, where we'll just have to trust that what they say is indeed true. It most likely is, of course, or they'd make fools of themselves. But when it comes from Vox, or Fox, it almost always comes with a slant.
My previous post sent directly to Microsoft's page for redeeming the promo-codes in the link, but that meant people were prompted to log in with Microsoft.

So here is a link to a page explaining what the link does, and offering a link to the app's page on the Windows Store so a visitor can decide whether they're interested at all in pursuing this further.
Why isn't `Result<T, E>` just `Result<T, E> where E: std::Error`?

I love rust, but I hate 'no from<lib::Error> implementation for my::Error' et al. 99.99% of the time I just want to bubble up a string to print from anything I'm using that might error.

I've used anyhow and friends, it just still requires more from me than I think should necessary.

But this is an honest question, several people put more thought into it than I have and decided it should be so, why?
How fast did the rest of Europe cut ties with Nazi Germany after World War II started? Current level of feeding Russia's war machine looks bizarre.
> Users’ ... viewing could be moulded by Chinese propagandists.

Not a problem during the decades of Voice of America broadcasts, of course.
No; I don't mean the underlying error. I mean the wrapped error.

Let's say I'm writing an API client that uses net/http underneath -

func CreateUser(username string, password string) error {
_, err := client.Get("https://myapi.com");
return fmt.Errorf("Failed to create: %w", err)
}

Then I create another method like so:

func SSOLogin(provider interface{}, token string) error {
user, pass, err = provider.login();
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("Failed to login: %w", err)
}
if err := CreateUser(user, pass); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("Failed to create: %w", err)
}
}

There is no way for the API consumer to discover if the error happened at provider.login() or CreateUser (except for calling String, and Finding "Failed to create". The wrapping is one layer deep, and to go any further you must create your own types. This commonly happens in larger codebases; and what happens is you must define your own error types if you expect your code to be consumed by others.

To be clear, there are way to solve this (creating your own types), but I don't think go handles that better than Rust, and the tools that Go does give you push developers in wrapping/concatenating errors into rather opaque types (which is mostly fine for webservers, you can just throw an error 500 and expect the user to try again). But that, plus `if err == nil` makes error handling in Go rather sore IMO. It's easy for developers to write, but not for library users to use, or for later users to maintain.
Yes, and there is the chance the animal model doesn’t represent human responses well, too.

We still use both to weed out treatments, for both ethical and cost reasons. Better to errantly eliminate a working drug occasionally than to let a lot of unhelpful stuff through.
More like $1M per mm.
If you want to look forward to a new editor. Jetbrains has started its preview of fleet: https://www.jetbrains.com/fleet/
I'd really like to understand how live reloading works a bit better, especially when editing variables that some running thread depends upon. Is there an overall strategy here? Do I implement locking around variables that I intend to play with at runtime?
I think, in the situation I gave, there isn't legitimate reason to believe either way. All you know is you're holding down a suspect who has a knife, and their brother is walking up awfully close up to you. You don't know if they're:

1. About to smack you in the head to save their brother

2. Trying to make a nice video recording

Adrenaline is flowing, and you have 1.5 seconds to decide. Which way do you guess?

The law seems reasonable in concept. Lots of flaws in the language, as is being pointed out in this discussion (although sometimes incorrectly). What bugs me most is: "C. this section does not establish a right or authorize any person to make a video recording of law enforcement activity."
Superhuman is Really useful. And almost completely devoid of friction.
That last graph[0] is... disturbing.

[0] "Energy content of gas storage sites in the EU". At the time of posting, it is mostly smooth but has a very steep drop at the end. from about 77 to 58 GW*year.
So hypothetically, if one is being illegally beaten by a person who happens to be an on-duty police officer, all the victim has to do to achieve justice is turn on their camera to record the incident to gather evidence. Bystanders can feel good that they’re ignoring the incident and carrying on with their days, as they know that it’s the victim’s responsibility to record their own beating.
Looks nice. A few notes: The 'Draft' and 'Files' folders should be inside the blot folder. An optional blot.exe in the folder could have help, check on rules (like underscore), open the website's editor for templates, upload/sync local files, etc...
TLDR; Comparing code reviews to logo redesign is comparing apples to oranges.

Both are about change – as is caring for your newborn when it shat it's diapers.

Or another one: it's like me saying what you said is like saying 'Penne Arrabiata' is a dish "that needs revisiting" because it hasn't been changed since yonx.

Millions of Italians would beg to differ. ;)
Yes it is. And it's still baseless.
Yeah

As long as the algorithm is open source and the design can be agreed upon by both parties.

You may still need a human to make some decisions that feed into the algo. If not you’re probably not doing anything new in which case an algo is anyway better.

This won’t work in positions where you’re expected to work with ambiguity and bring order out of chaos though I’d be interested to think about how that can be quantified.

It really comes down to being transparent and clear. Humans can do it too, machines can do it better.
A much too thick one, unfortunately.
+1 Aurora was the secret sauce for us to scale a db-heavy SaaS very quickly with no dedicated ops team. Got us an extra 9 in uptime, too. The cost difference from vanilla RDS was negligible for our revenue model. YMMV, of course on that.
US has the same stance on the Democratic world like the EU.

As it appears, China actually supported war in Europe. As long as it didn't happen during the games.

So yes, China should be under suspicion a lot more than the US from an European viewpoint.

Ps. I'm from Belgium
Short answer: we are.

Clinical trials are expensive. NHP (Non-human primate) studies are also expensive, but orders of magnitude less expensive than human studies. We pharma researchers don't want to put stuff into humans if there's risk of failure, especially if that failure is a tox finding and not just low efficacy.

So we de-risk as much as possible. We go so far as to prove everything on human cells, then buy mice with humanized portions of their genome to test the target in mice that are more like humans in the way we need them to be. Then we test in NHPs, because it's very unsafe to assume that a drug that works and is safe in cells is safe in primates.

In a current project, I'm dealing with the fallout of this exact problem. We did a ton of testing, modeling, in vitro work, rodent work, then we dosed in monkeys and it caused a massive tox signal. We have to go back to the drawing board and explain what happened to the monkeys, how we're going to address it, maybe kill the whole program, and find a new path forward. It passed all of the rigorous pre-monkey testing. And I'm at a major pharma company, where we have pretty specialized teams doing most of this work.

edited to correct an error
Your interpretation of the constitution is quite expansive. In what provision do you find it unconstitutional that laws are passed regulating the distance of someone to be kept away from interfering with police duties? Police put up tape to cordon off a crime scene. That's unconstitutional too? Examine your own sense of reasonableness.
Today there's a really interesting tournament going on between NFL players on the chess.com twitch channel: https://www.twitch.tv/chess

People like Larry Fitzgerald, Will Davis, and Amari Cooper.