skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Thanks. I’ve wanted something similar to rank HN comments - I really want to read some users and I really don’t care to read the same tripe repeated by some other users.

I presume it is a hobby project but calling it PeeryView and then using braid.news was confusing to me. I didn’t even realise the “home” link would take me to the site (or maybe I didn’t see the home link, because I look to top left for that? e.g. Y logo on HN)
I worry that stories like the above article will be used to justify outlawing ride share in favor of the cartels. This is actually the case in many jurisdictions where ride-share apps are still not allowed and the taxi industry still operates in a cartel fashion. I don't care about Uber or Lyft fwiw. No stake in either in any way shape or form.

My post is a very relevant warning (in my view) about allowing politicians to use the above stories as an excuse to close down an industry. They are looking for such an excuse. Be warned and call it out.
If it gets replaced by a strictly less murderous alternative, this alternative is preferable.
I feel like the 15% that do not use TikTok are more likely to be from lower class or impoverished families. Likely because they have limited access to smartphones or electronics of their own.

I’m sure there are “elite” families who strictly forbid their children from using social media, but I suspect this population is very low. In my own anecdotal experience, the most affluent teens had the most access to drugs and things our parents forbade us from having.
Is there a list of tags? I'm not sure I'm seeing it properly: the graph is just a galaxy of tiny dots, to see the text I have to hover the mouse over them.
You can politely ask me not to do that. Legally preventing me from doing that is unconstitutional.
Mapy.cz (and their Android App) is fantastic!

Due to the fact that it is based on (relatively frequently updated) OpenStreetMap data, its data density and depth is really really good and allows for quite obscure POI searches like ping pong tables, barbecue/fire pits, geographical features like valleys, etc.
How many advertisers advertising in a VPN destination where a particular language is dominant would advertise in another language? YouTube doesn't care whether you can understand it. Those advertisers may not be looking to advertise to people who can't understand their language either.

How many advertisers outside of that country are going to ask YouTube to play their ads in that country in a language different from the dominant language? Probably not many.
Maybe, but from stories I've heard from some locals, Vegas is pretty close. It's very much a mob run city, and I've heard stories (completely unsubstantiated) of assassinations related to taxi turf battles etc, and the tourism board directing police officers to not record any murders unless there were a lot of public witnesses so they can still be a top travel destination for tourists.

These are like, ramblings from random drunk dude on the street kind of stories, so maybe it's all BS, but it sounds like there is a lot of violent crime happening there in collaboration with the local police.
The ones that call people "contractors" to get around employment laws pretty universally are in that business, yes. Is that controversial?
Less biomedical research on monkeys means putting more humans at danger. An animal shouldn’t be put over a human!
Deep dive into Caddy web server
It's free, you can print it out and tape it to your workstation, etc

The biggest problem with password managers is that you become completely dependent on them (and therefore completely helpless without them) once you start using them. This scenario still allows you to remain decoupled from that dependency.
Not in trades. These students will graduate with years of experience, taking the website explanation at face value. There isn't something akin to ABET, or even FE/PE exams for these skills, but if they can count their work experience while in school here, they can become licensed tradesmen in states with work and apprenticeship requirements.
there is spotify which I think is winning in the us
In the West, the abortion thing is a (ideally immutable) moral line in the sand.

In China, it's just an instrument the state turns on and off as needed for population control.

The difference in approaches is so interesting.
Dead?
The comment clearly doesn't make any sense, fertilizer or not. It's a tautological explanation of the sort "they're poor because they don't have enough money", just rephrased a bit to look less ridiculous.

I honestly regretted even having read another foreign policy thread on HN after seeing something like that upvoted to the top once again. Must remember to stay out of anything non-tech related.
I think a smart watch is a more impressive piece of engineering!
Also learn the "London System", and try play correspondence style games.
Why aren't the researchers already using those? If those work better than monkeys I would think researchers would already be using them.
You are asking whether sporadic US police abuses and a literal police state stack up comparably in terms of human rights?
The structure of the experiment seems to have been just a correlation between collaborative hours and some measure of happiness. I wonder if the causation doesn't run the other way to what they propose though. When I'm happy in work, I don't really feel the need to have to work to grow my network outside my team. I have worked a job though where things just weren't clicking, so I did put more effort into trying to make them click by meeting people. That would have included getting involved in more projects, and doing a bit more collaborative work.
No, but if a taxi industry is murdering people, and also helped create laws that prevent competitors from entering the market, I think it is OK to get around the laws that prevent competitors from competing with the taxi murder mafia.
Is this the same situation that came up with Elasticsearch?
Communication, as the atomic element of networking, requires both transmission and receipt to be said to have happened.

Speech is transmission.

Reach is landing at a receiver.

Substituting /dev/null in place of a human being does not satisfy speech having occurred. A concordance must be reached between the speaker and at least one other individual.
Another page up the same street: http://www.rosettacode.org/wiki/Rosetta_Code
They have an insane amount of examples
pfdietz said, long term storage is necessary if you want a 100% renewable grid, replying to me saying it's not necessary (though there's some potential confusion around whether responsive demand to make green hydrogen counts as long term storage or not).

Someone else said, that's a big if, since 99% renewable is probably much cheaper.

When they said you can try it yourself, I thought they were disagreeing with that point, which I, and the people who made the model, agree with.

(As another example, the current US strategy is to get to 95% low carbon electricity and then shift focus to electrifying more things, as that has a bigger impact on carbon at that point, and helps to absorb variability.)

Now, I'm not sure what point they were making.
The biggest problem with password managers is that you become completely dependent on them (and therefore completely helpless without them) once you start using them. This scenario still allows you to remain decoupled from that dependency. You could print out a copy of your metadata to take with you on your trip to Europe without worrying that you'll be completely hosed if someone steals your phone/password manager.
>if your competitor flaunts the law

The law in question being simply that they cannot compete at all.

>does not pay local taxes

They pay all sorts of taxes in my jurisdiction from day one, and still kicked the taxi industry's ass.
You seem to be the only one making that comparison.
Wage growth by itself means nothing if not compared with something else like inflation.
I imagine there will be a lot of live-streams that begin with a cop walking to the camera going "hey hey hey put that away" and end around there.
I wanted to upvote this comment but that just feels wrong.
> You don’t understand Uber’s business model. They want prices so low because that’s how they make money

this sounds like you don't understand the concept of a business model.
Someone describe to me why politicians even bother to meet with Uber.

Why would Biden, Macron bother with this company, and not others?

Where is the 'money flow' happening here? Is someone being bribed? Was Uber funnelling money to a related cause?

I can understand ministers wanting to please a big up and coming company, sure, that's their job in some way, but not like this.

How does Uber have the ability to get the VP to 'change their speech'.

What's going on? That's not in the article.
I don't disagree with this... but is there anything wrong with recommending `thiserror` by default, especially for less experienced Rustaceans? It's fairly sane, encourages "good" error design. I wish there'd been something like it when I started.

And moving forwards, you could a) still write out the error type and associated code to replace `thiserror` fairly easily, or b) possibly benefit from any work being done to speed up proc macros in the future. So I feel like recommending it as a default is still the best option?
Flagging is not simply for "this is fake information". It's also meant to signal "this is going to end in a flame, let's stop it before it does".
Police violence is not a subset of violence and gun violence?
Ironically, the way the phrase is applied depends on the time period. Historically, federalism meant what you're saying. That is to say Jay and Hamilton were Federalists, and advocated a strong federal government.

In modern parlance Federalism generally means the opposite: being strongly in favor of states rights. You'll also see this called "new federalism". The explanation for this is that Federalism is about balance of power, and the phrase is generally used to indicate policy that would return a stronger balance. Currently (since the Civil War in particular) the federal government is extremely strong, whereas historically, in the time of the Federalist Papers, it was extremely weak.
That sounds pretty great. I can't imagine my utility, PG&E, doing the same. Their TOU rates start at about the same as their tiered rates and go up from there. Even under maximal load shifting that plan costs me more than the simpler (yet still complicated) plan.

Instead it's more economical for me to drive my grid dependence to zero. I'm one of the "no thanks" folks in the article.
If you use a vaultless password manager like GoKey you're also going to be "completely dependent on it" (and a printed copy of your list and a copy of your key if you're using a key rather than a master password) to log into anything. Why is that better than being "completely dependent" on another free password manager like Pass that's just a wrapper around gnupg and git?

In either case you're going to need a copy of the software itself and some sort of shared file with either a list of password changes/rules, the actual encrypted passwords, and a master password or key to log in to anything.

Once you've given up on being able to log into sites without having a specific program handy and synchronizing some sort of data, why not simply store the encrypted passwords in the data you're synchronizing?
I confess I know nothing of Uber's running costs but in my layman's understanding I think GP point is still valid. Driver buys the fuel and services the car. How does having more rides cost Uber more?
>Perhaps '8 feet' is meant to keep a filmer out of potential harm, and from interfering with a police officer and suspect potentially struggling.

If that were the intent, there'd be no reason to focus on the act of filming. It would just say "8 feet for anyone besides police officers and those the police officers are dealing with."
I think this question is sort of another way to phrase, "What are the crystal systems [or possibly lattice systems] other than primitive cubic?" And the answer is in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_system; there are 6 or 31 answers depending on how you look at it. Or maybe the question is "What are the 3-honeycombs other than the cubic honeycomb?" which is discussed in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honeycomb_%28geometry%29 and to which there are an infinite number of answers.

Crystal systems are usually described in terms of point lattices, while you're talking about polyhedra, but the Voronoi polyhedra of the points in the lattice are the polyhedra you're looking for. (This is mentioned at the end of the Wolfram™Ⓡ MathWorld™Ⓡ article you linked.) One of my favorites is the cuboctahedral honeycomb corresponding to hexagonal close-packed crystals.

Even within cubic crystals, you could reasonably argue that face-centered cubic crystals "fill[] 3-D space with ‘triangles’".

Honeycombs do not, as I understand it, have to be periodic. In particular, any 3-D rep-tile can be used to tile space in a manner similar to the Penrose tiling, and usually the result is aperiodic. I wrote a 2-D demonstration of this process is at http://canonical.org/~kragen/sw/dev3/skitch#!ffffrrrfffffrrr...].
Understandable, but if you read the book I think it’s comforting to that avenue of thought. Basically, you can be assured that American Foreign policy will be the same no matter what democratically elected government is in place, and the book explains why in 260 pages. I’m not the author and I don’t have a PhD or even think I’m smart enough to sum that up, with end notes, in a paragraph. But I thought it was smart and adds new light to what the original commenter said about learning how the world actually works.
First prototype was a haptic / audio interface on top of GPS.

Want to start testing it out and polishing it and iterating on other ways to solve challenges one challenge at a time

Looking for people to collaborate with on this project
Upon a closer look, it indeed seems that the certificate count limitations apply to the manually requisitioned certificates, not the ACME ones:

> By using ZeroSSL's ACME feature, you will be able to generate an unlimited amount of 90-day SSL certificates at no charge, also supporting multi-domain certificates and wildcards. Each certificate you create will be stored in your ZeroSSL account.

So I guess that's a viable option.
What?

#2 and #5 exist only to support #7.

#4 usefulness is completely dependent on the context.

#9 is a joke, right? It's an anti-pattern for most of the web based SaaS applications, and poisonous to anything that isn't SaaS.

And #12... Try that in a large regulated company and people may quite as well end up in jail.
> It's of course a problem when regulators disallow them to leverage this large class of drivers. When they are forced to operate like a taxi operator, a big part of their value proposition is gone. This is bad for consumers and Uber, but good for taxi operators.

It's only good for customers when they need to get a ride for certain times and only for some time. One of the reasons why taxis get regulated is because taxi companies need to guarantee service throughout the day. Drivers who only drive on the side will not provide that service, moreover if the regular taxi drivers are driven into bankruptcy because of uber drivers taking all the profitable times prices on average actually go up and especially for off peak times.
I've skimmed through the source code, so I'll save y'all some time.

It's all based on a PRNG, which is based on an AES-256 in CTR mode (making it a stream cipher) seeded with a key generated by 4096 iterations of PBKDF2-SHA256. PRNG just decrypts a stream of zeroes with a KDF-generated key. All standard library algorithms, nothing custom.

To generate a password, it builds an alphabet, picks a random character from it by reading a byte from the PRNG. It is looping until it reads a byte is less than `255 - (255 % max)` where `max` is length of the alphabet, then returns `b / (255 / max)` where `b` is the byte from the RNG. Basically, dividing [0-254] range (255 is never accepted) into equal-length `max` pieces and figuring out where it falls. The generated password is checked for compliance (i.e. that randomness had produced a special character, etc.) and returned if it's good, otherwise it loops and tries to generate a password again. Given that RNG is fully deterministic, this produces consistent results.

I haven't bothered looking into keypair generation - I just woke up, sipping on my "morning" coffee as I'm typing this, so I'm kinda lazy.
that storage looks like it's going to be gone in weeks

at which point... the EU economy shuts down?
There's nothing special or enlightened about choosing the life you want to live. Plenty of people do it, for better or worse outcomes. Give it a try, start with a low consequence decision, take it, and see what momentum you build.
Are you trolling? No it isn't?

If nothing else, the time issue is a huge one. Cheaters have very consistent seconds-per-move while actual masters make obvious moves instantly and pause on tougher moves.
I thought it was a reasonably good answer considering that the question doesn't explicitly spell out why it might flag someone like Magnus Carlsen (who I learned is a grandmaster and World Chess Champion). To rephrase it, Irwin doesn't flag people for playing well — it alerts moderators when it finds suspicious signals across several dimensions.
I do not know how to describe this post as anything other than anti-religious bigotry not tolerated on Hacker News.
People who buy Richard Mille pieces likely don’t care about practicality.
Ask HN: Would you prefer an algorithm to human for evaluating your promotion?
High level humans and chess engines play differently. You can see commentary on chess YouTube videos when they run across cheaters.

Also the chess engines people use are accessible, you can compare what a suspected cheater does with what the cheater does and if they’re exactly the same consistently, you have a pretty strong signal.

One of the bigger tells are strange moves that set up a many move series resulting in a victory, things that humans just can’t find quickly.
You may like to read this: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/2s9u0s/comment/c...
And I "composed" a (terrible) anthem for the crew (I used to use the nickname 'throttle' back then). So there's that :P
The majority of the time something successful comes out of the EU, the US buys it wholesale.

Skype, Shazam, iZettle, Mojang etc

I’m not sure it would be different for social networks. (similar to how the match group owns practically all the dating sites and apps; interestingly I just found out that the match group refused to pull out of Russia.)
Because of how ELO works, your win-loss ratio will pretty quickly normalize to 50-50, regardless of how good you are.

Over time your increased rating will reflect increased skill, but even if your skill was doubled tomorrow, you would still hit a 50-50 W/L because you would be playing people at the same skill level.

However…if you want to feel better, play for a couple weeks and then challenge an occasional player. Once you obliterate them, you’ll feel better about the losses it took to get there. :)
I think there is a major framing issue here.

Speaking for myself, and the many colleagues I’ve spoken to about this, collaboration isn’t the issue.

“Collaboration” is the issue.

I’ve had some of my most meaningful (and happiness-inducing) experiences at work when collaborating deeply with colleagues.

I’ve had some of the most frustrating experiences at work when “collaborating”.

The distinction simply being: “Collaboration” in the form of “interacting in realtime” or “existing in the same space” can also be 99% distraction.

“Real” collaboration - the kind where the collective consciousness of the group results in outcomes that could not have been achieved solo - is where the magic lies.

I’m absolutely happier with more autonomy and less distraction. But that is not the antithesis of collaboration.

A pendulum that swings too far in the other direction will leave folks feeling isolated, and will reduce the potential of a group. Finding the right balance and distinguishing between real collaborative interaction vs. “acting out” something that looks like collaboration on the surface is critical.
It's plausible. But understand that one can imagine putting heat into underground masses with extremely long time constants, artificial geothermal in essence. It's possible that this wouldn't be practical but I'd want to see details. Geothermal heat pumps already do this.
Directly linked the article text is unreadably light.

Archive.Today fares better: https://archive.ph/ueoTl
This page shows a relationship with the university at the bottom, so you may be right
If you can't see why AZ is a shithole you might be the problem.
I dumped my last job exactly because collaboration became the mantra.

I tried to effect change but leadership didn't listen and my team wanted to apply the collaboration koolaid and be good team members.

Glad there's research I can point to.
My thinking is that we are in fact constantly compelled to take some lives(thankfully not of our own kinds) by very our own existence. We only exist by consuming energy and energy only comes as some form of exploitation of other lives, even if one had been exclusively consuming fruit on trees that exist to be eaten, unless such hypothetical man is a thinking solar panel in vacuum of space that can convert light into its own energy.

That dark part is not serious - at least not in this context. That's just an extreme example, but the point is we do not exist without the karma of our body.
Do people want things like this? Not just developers, I mean people just like them? Genuine question. Maybe I'm burned out, but the last thing I want to talk about outside of work is computers/programming.

In my life dating, people like me just made for a rather boring relationship. My wife and I couldn't be more different of people, with wildly different interests, but it makes for always interesting conversation and learning from one another.
In China 8 is considered to be a really lucky number, signifying wealth. https://www.mansionglobal.com/articles/it-s-in-the-numbers-l...
It is a comprehensive answer.

Top human players tend to not make the moves engines make. They also stay relatively strong when under time pressure, where lots of humans reentering moves from a computer fail.

Playing someone taking 10 seconds for each move— whether there is only one valid move to capture back or the situation is complicated— you get suspicious. And then when they forget how to play when they have 3 seconds per move stands out.
Both platforms are worth supporting. Com does a lot of great events and creates great content, and I like supporting it. I also prefer their UX.

Lichess has Maia bot, some good course material as well, and I like to use my lichess account sometimes as an “alt” where I can experiment with less stress about losing rating. Rating doesn’t matter, but it still makes me queasy if I tilt 100 points while trying out a new opening.
it's way better than vanilla RDS even without any clustering. it is far more stable under load / near capacity. the storage layer is amazing. people here who are underselling it relative to vanilla RDS simply lack operational experience under load and have a checklist-level understanding
I'm assuming there is irony and you mean 2 is not enough. But it's still day and night compared to single party, irony is not an argument in itself.
One would hope if you're being arrested for being closer than 8 feet, when you're not, you'll have video evidence to the contrary (kinda by definition). It might not be precise enough to tell 7'11" from 8'1", but otherwise, you have actual forensic evidence to tell who was wrong and who was right.
Reverse Engineering How WAFs Like Cloudflare Identify Bots