skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Personally I’ve never really had an issue with Google - I think my mental model with how it works is to the point it makes sense.

It would be amazing if this could be used for internal documentation however. Like we have so much documentation on our wiki which is just disorganised.
I particularly like the title, given they were the first to use that awful hcaptcha nonsense and then subject a large amount of visitors to it, so much that cloudflare is actually a detriment to the user experience now
DiCaprio managed to make the jump despite always looking young for his age; Holland could get there. He won't look young forever.

Making the jump from "teen hearthrob" is hard; Depp made it but Richard Grieco and the whole cast of 90210 did not.
Yeah, a few years ago I remember a news story about Cosco accepting a returned real Christmas tree sometime after Christmas, by which time most of the needles had fallen off and the thoroughly used tree had no value other than mulch.

Maybe good publicity, I suppose.
Godot is a great engine that will continue to grow and improve. Unity too is excellent, with many useful professional and tutorial assets. Unity's 3D offerings and tooling are more mature, even as an indie. Some of my favorite professional games made in Unity are: Dyson Sphere Program, Cities Skylines, Pillars of Eternity and Disco Elysium. These are all elite tier for their genres.

Regarding tooling, there's a lot of cruft sure, but that's just Sturgeon's law at play with Unity's size and age. Another aspect of Unity's reputation is it faces a fate similar to web development: it's a lot of people's first experience with programming.

The Godot experience is cleaner, more streamlined and constantly adding more great features. Godot is newer compare to Unreal and Unity so hasn't had time to accumulate cruft. But as long as developers aim for some amount of backwards compatibility, it will happen. That's not necessarily a bad thing.
this is actually our recurring joke for our team meeting offsites!
Tell this to the stock market? Or any other form of finance that isn’t strictly focused on buying an apple from your local grocer?

You can move money across the world, take loans or lend assets, place investments, manage funds, deposit into escrow, do peer to peer exchange of assets across a range of stability and fungibility, donate immediately and anonymously to nonprofits, setup auctions and crowdfunds. These are useful financial tools, and still working fine in DeFi even after prices crash. You can also do many of these things in tradfi and CeFi in some countries, but without the “De” part, decentralization.

I am curious - have you tried DeFi?
Does pipewire still do software rendering at the app server (because no GPU) and then run a video codec to ship whole frames to the desktop?
I remember going to several questionable bookshops that sold coverless books quite cheaply (frequently $1/$2 for a lb of books). As a kid it was an excellent way to stock up on books.
> But marking wallets as sanctioned, and threatening any wallets that transact with it to be either similarly sanctioned or subject to heightened scrutiny, would diminish the value of those coins relative to coins which can be freely traded with anyone

Doesn't this already happen? Basically any bitcoin that comes out of a tumbler or any wallet address that has transacted with tumbled coins is banned on KYC exchanges: https://sethforprivacy.com/posts/fungibility-graveyard/
Nix, Blender and GHC all have IRC channels on Libera, with a few hundred members each. I didn't join them but I assume they're bridged to Matrix via EMS.
> Do you think there is anyone here who didn't understand exactly what they meant?

"Aoccrdrinig to rscheearch at Cmabridge Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be ttaol mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe."
> Who would build any sort of factory if they did not know that many people would be available to take the jobs at low-pay rates?

> Much of the hunger literature talks about how it is important to assure that people are well fed so that they can be more productive. That is nonsense. No one works harder than hungry people. Yes, people who are well nourished have greater capacity for productive physical activity, but well-nourished people are far less willing to do that work.

This is literally how capitalism started and maintains itself: remove all other options for subsistence besides wage-work (e.g. taking away previous rights via enclosure), and then hunger becomes your overseer that compels people to labor for you.
Building the communication fabric it takes to make those oodles of identical processors to exchange and share data quickly so they don't get bogged down in their own communication overhead is a profoundly interesting problem, and by "profoundly interesting" I mean "call Richard Feynman in to help you solve it":

https://longnow.org/essays/richard-feynman-connection-machin...

Besides which, at that level the goal is not to go "look at this cool thing we built", it's more like "how do we cheaply and effectively build something that can solve these massive weather/nuclear explosion/human brain/etc. simulation problems we have?" and if ganging together lots of off-the-shelf CPUs/GPUs achieves that goal with less time, effort, and cost than building super-custom, boutique-schmoutique hardware, so be it.
Don't be an ass, don't imply my breath smells. Be better than that.
Returning products does use energy though, often in the form of gas or diesel. It may be more ecological to simply ask consumers to destroy some items such as plastic totes (bulky) or masonry (heavy).
Arabic is the 5th or 6th most spoken language. I think the concern for low resource languages is that nuances like that won't get picked up.
I would first check if I am required/optional in these meeting invites. If optional, skip it and if any of these meeting subject/agenda piques your interest; watch a recording (assuming it's recorded). Make questions and ask your manager in your 1:1.
Yes, but if an attacker has physical access and unlimited time, you've probably lost anyway.

What this seems to be focused on are the "remote zero-click/one-click" vulnerabilities we've seen, in which either a message is delivered that never shows up but installs a backdoor hook, or a website can deliver a malware package to a particular user and install the backdoor hook without notifications.

It sounds like it does improve some of the physical security features, which should help reduce attack surface, but I wouldn't trust any bit of consumer electronics against a sustained physical attack by a sufficiently motivated adversary.
Meanwhile, I come from the perspective that a shared database that everyone talks to is a shared infrastructure point. And... I have seen those cause more problems than makes sense.

My bet is I'm also just an old man in this discussion. Such that I really think we can't underline enough how particular the discussion will be to every organization.
I installed a recirculating pump and had it on the timer. But then for some reason, I switched it to always on and it's so much nicer. Hot water is always hot.
> I think Zig, D are examples of this niche but syntax wise they don't completely look like C.

That is because C's type declaration format is provably, as in actually provably, terrible.

There is a reason the majority of modern languages have switched away from how C declares types.

Honestly it'd be nice if the C committee could find a way to tack on a new variable declaration syntax to C, so everyone didn't have to keep looking up, or using tools, to declare non-trivial function pointers.
The NSO group used links and attachments in iMessage. These protections would mitigate those attacks.
Of course this comes out just four months after I buy an M1 Air.
Ikea furniture is very easy to repair with little more than wood glue. Ikea is also very gracious with giving you replacement or spare hardware for cheap or free.
I dunno. I'm a FE dev and have been for 20 years. I'm finding more and more that FE jobs are webpack and dependency management jobs. Far from building bespoke user interfaces or developing new patterns. The design side of web development has grown boring thanks to bootstrap and bootstrap influenced design libraries. All the fun challenges of the early aughts are gone and all that's left is figuring out why library A doesn't work with library B. If I were just starting out, I would go to backend development. It seems more creative development is happening there than the graphical part of the web. Sadly, I'm only in it for the money these days.
Could a security expert enlighten me: is Windows more secure today than macOS, if we purely take OS-level and hardware-level security measures and ignore subjective factors? (like marketshare, attractiveness of targets, etc.)

Windows has all sorts of buzzwordy-sounding security features: Microsoft Defender Application Guard (Hyper-V for untrusted websites & Office files), kernel virtualization-based security (VBS), Code Integrity Guard, Arbitrary Code Guard, Control Flow Guard, and Hardware-enforced Stack Protection.

It's extremely hard to compare the two on a deep technical level (beyond "modern OS's are safe, install updates, you'll be fine") without having deep security experience. Any professional insights?
When I first signed up for LI I honestly couldn't tell the difference between the actual feed and a what I imagined a parody site would look like. The posts that proclaim themselves to hold controversial ideas, followed by the most banal cliches possible, crack me up.

Once in a while I check the feed for kicks and it's always 100% spam, cliches, humble brags, and not-so-humble brags.
When I spy on folks that buy the truly insanely expensive but useless gadgets/fashion, I really start to agree with sentiments like yours.

There's few things quite as profitable as an endless black pit of despair within yourself. Well that, and war.
TikTok used to suggest all sorts of long-form articles. Tiktok is all short-form video; a bunch of vapid trash.
As one of them, I agree. It's easy to jump to the first thing you notice (something superficially wrong to point out), I often do this. And it's hard to think beyond that and engage with the ideas instead.

But then again, that's why we try to write elegantly so readers don't stumble on the words and instead think about the meaning behind them.
> gun culture

Culture? Come on now.
> If you're a company releasing changes daily / hourly, monoliths make progressively less sense and become progressively harder to work with.

Counter argument: Your overall CI/CD infrastructure landscape will be much simpler and muss less error-prone.

As will be your release and test pipelines. For instance, if you have a few dozen microservices, each being released every other hour, how do you run E2E tests (across all services) before you release anything? Let's say you take your microservice A in version v1.2.3 (soon to be released) and test it against microservice B's current prod version v2.0.1. Meanwhile, team B is also working on releasing the new version v2.1.0 of microservice B and testing it against A's current prod version v1.2.2. Both test runs work fine. But no one ever bothered to test A v1.2.3 and B v2.1.0 against each other…
evil-mode

In other applications I mostly avoid the ctrl-v/ctrl-c and use X's highlighting and middleclicking system instead. When those aren't available, I actually prefer context menu copy/paste entries to the CUA shortcuts.
Short it and gain free money if you’re that confident.
Stack overflow offers a version for companies. I've never used it, but it sounds like what you might want
I used to say there are two kinds of UI designers: the ones who care about the interface, and the ones who care about the user.

Then we renamed it UX, trying to make both words about the user, and while I have spent less time navigating the post-rename world than I did the pre-rename world, my understanding of both human nature and the tech news cycle tells me that basically nothing changed.

Just like calling it Software Engineering didn't stop people from YOLOing spaghetti code and gambling on musical chairs or an air of obliviousness to get them out of the blast radius.
Perhaps that's what it eventually evolves into. Probably easier to get this off the ground by developing it as a separate mode.
> Which is why many C developers typedef the struct so that they don't have to prefix struct types with the keyword.

Oh, hello. Yes, guilty.
To point 1, it was trivial for me to open the PDF in Preview on macOS, save it out as a multi-page PNG, open that PNG in Preview and macOS itself just let me copy out the text without error (in my limited test).
Nahhhhh, I gotta browse the internet to be effective. That requires me logging into random sites with personal logins.

I don't install anything personal on my work computer, but I wouldn't hesitate to open an email or pdf from a seemingly trusted source. I don't really blame the dev here.

What you propose is a reasonable solution, but I feel like it slams in the face of actual human behavior. Most people act the way I describe, even most tech professionals.
It is a strange problem indeed. I'm in a similar job seeking position as OP having difficulty convincing some companies that my lack of certain concrete knowledge should be a non-issue, when you consider the true spirit of what a software engineer is not what you know, but how you come to know things and your ability to adapt to them.

As a SWE, I've been told many times that the ability to pick up new techs and languages should be your bread and butter, and I believe this strongly. If you understand the basics of network requests and REST patterns then most web frameworks are the same. Frameworks are just abstractions on top of the basics. In the real world of job searching, nobody seems to care. They prefer specific names for keywords.

I've also been playing the numbers name for far too long that seems like I'm falling into a sunk cost fallacy. Unemployed since late 2019 and sent out nearly 2000 cold applications. Given a set of inputs defining job experience, what is someone's probability of getting an offer within the next week after 20 applications? After 100? Or after 500?

I tend to hate solving problems that give no visible signs of progress towards seeing the end, but at least when I do these kinds of problems at work, I'm getting paid for it. Right now I am trying to solve such a problem but without compensation, without much motivation.

Getting a job offer right now is biggest challenge that I've encountered in my life. I have not been as confused or clueless, nothing I've done for my career ever came close to stumping me. And it also should NOT have to be the biggest challenge in my life. Better candidates should be things like, how to organize and manage a team for a very large work project, or how to plan your savings strategy for an early retirement. Finding a job should be among the most basic challenges, not super complicated.
Extreme situation that could be a counterexample to your claim:

Dr. Evil is 90 years old, his consciousness is slowly fading away, and he is going to die in a week. He is almost ready to release a bomb that will torture kill half of the world population. If you pull the lever Dr. Evil will die today and you will save all those people. You are the only one who can pull the lever. Do you pull the lever, or do you stick to your principle of not sacrificing other people who don't want to be sacrificed?
Well ok, but if you listen carefully you can hear which elevator is coming/closest and always be standing directly in front of the one that is arriving.
The problem with C is that its... kind of minimal, but it also needs tons of extensions to get things done.

Want multiple heaps? That'll be a compiler extension. Want to specify exactly where a variable is laid out in memory? Compile extension.

Have a memory layout that isn't just a flat map of address space? Better reach for a compiler extension.

Hardware registers? Eh, overlay it with a union or a struct or something, it'll be fine. Unless you want some sort of non-trivial typing on those registers.

People forget that C is written against an abstract C machine. C is not written against the underlying hardware platform. And the abstract C machine may differ from your target hardware by a fair bit.
Let’s not let better be the enemy of good either. Better than terrible is still bad and is nowhere near good.

It is frankly ridiculous that anybody should believe Apple when they claim to provide even minimal resistance to well-funded determined attackers. Protecting against well-funded determined attackers has been the holy grail of software security since forever and everybody in software security at least claims to be working toward that. Despite that, the prevailing state of “best-in-class” “best-practices” commercial software security is objectively terrible including Apple circa 1 year ago.

Are we supposed to believe that Apple, despite abject failure over the last few decades until as recently as the last time they announced security updates to the iPhone, has finally this time, for sure, pinky swear its true, jumped from terrible to the holy grail, or even good, because they said so?

No, this is absolute, utter, unequivocal garbage. Their claims are completely unsupported and they should be excoriated for spewing unsubstantiated bullshit that muddies the waters of the actual state of software security and misleads people into believing they are getting a meaningful degree of protection or software security.

If they want to make such claims, they should put their money where there mouth is and, instead of certifying iOS to EAL1+ and AVA_VAN.1 as they currently do, they should certify it in “Lockdown Mode” to EAL6-7 and AVA_VAN.5 which actually does certify protection against “high attack potential” attackers such as large organized crime and state-sponsored attackers. At the very least they could certify it to EAL5 and AVA_VAN.4 which certifies protection against “moderate attack potential” attackers. Until they do that, their claims to protect against state-sponsored attackers are complete unverifiable bullshit.
> The FBI's Wray warned that if China was to forcibly take Taiwan it would "represent one of the most horrific business disruptions the world has ever seen".

Even intelligence agencies thinks in terms of “business disruption”. I feel like the word “horrific” should be reserved.
I'm glad they improved the placement of the side buttons to be more "normal", i.e. more like other mice. I think that was the thing that annoyed me most about the 2S.
yeah but that's solved by disabling notifications before presenting.
Australian Federal Police did it as well: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/sep/11/insid...
There's no notch on the M1 Air. Are you expecting one? Notches are terrible and are enough all alone to make me change what I'll buy.
This has always been the law. Common law courts have been issuing court orders that require you to take actions in foreign countries, even in violation of foreign law, for as long as it's been a legal question. The CLOUD Act actually introduced some additional safeguards and allows judges to consider the seriousness of the foreign law violation and weigh it against the importance of the court getting access to the foreign-stored data.

You unfortunately need something like this because otherwise people will just hide documents, money, stolen property, etc. in foreign countries out of reach of US courts, even if they are US persons and corporations.

It isn't just pro-government. Imagine you are a criminal defendant and there is evidence proving your innocence in a foreign server controlled by an American person or company. This rule makes sure you can legally compel that entity to go get the data, the laws of that other country be damned, so you can present your defense.
> interest rates, printing money

Many nation states don't have control over interest rates (because their central banks are run independently of the government) or even the ability to print money, if they have adopted another currency.[0]

> Mandatory taxes

States typically tax transactions which happen on their territory (e.g. wages and sales), and in the case of Apple, their devices are their territory, like feudally controlled tracts of land in cyberspace. Taking a cut of all app sales and in-app purchases seems very much like a tax under this analogy.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Currency_substitution
Saw a bit of the first video. I really have no clue about the literature of the impact of childhood experiences in adult relationships, and for his complaint about the lack of references, he provides none either.

Then he moves to the friendship video. His complaint seems to be that the videos simplify and overstate their claims. Which is true. But he doesn't really refute the main point to the video, which is that friendships, by having lower expectations, suffer less (though definitely not always, we all know about toxic friendships) from the more complicated dynamics of romantic relationships. It sounds more like nitpicking. Then he changes from the descriptive presentation of relationships to a normative one (romantic relationships should be "nice"), which misses the point entirely. (Plus the ideia that relationships should be "fun" and "nice" and not also a space for emotional growth where shit comes to top tells me he probably didn't have really intimate relationships).
What's the company? (if you don't mind sharing)

I have been working with ruby for 10 years, kind of / sort of thinking of jumping ship to a new company / job soon.
> At least, Squeak is cohesive and hasn't broken with Alan Kay's vision.

what are the big differences between squeak and pharo?
Russia also defaulted because it can't pay (in any currency) parties that are barred by sanctions from transacting with the Russian government. It wouldn't matter if Russia were able to ship paper USD to their creditors; the creditors cannot accept that payment.
He could be talking about boobie trapped chips
Different ares of engineering and science use intersecting sets of terminology. This page is a very clear definition of how these terms are defined and what they mean in a particular context around energy production and utilization.
> So the publisher prints the warning inside the book to remind customers not to buy them like that.

But the publisher's warning also verifies that it's a bona fide copy.

Just imagining...

Dear downloader: please make sure the file with the sha1 hash fingerprint "34973274" is accompanied with a physical copy of our famous hologram logo sticker. If you don't have the sticker then STOP-- do not open the program to view the contents.
independent deployability, independent scalability, ease of refactoring, reduced blast radius, code ownership and maintenance, rapid iteration, language diversity (ie an ml service in python and a rest api in nodejs), clear domain (payments, user management, data repository and search) just to name a few. if two or more services need none of the above or must communicate with the same database or is too complex to communicate with each other if a db is not used (ie queue nightmare, shared cache or files) are usually signs that the two should be merged as they probably belong to the same domain. at least thats some of the logic i follow when architecting them.
Any C/C++ extensions that wants to enable more efficient Python has to learn GIL and how to manipulate that as well. Including not limited to: how to give up GIL (so that other Python code can progress); how to prepare your newly initiated threads to be Python GIL friendly etc.

Personally, GIL is more surprising to me when interop with Python.
I've implemented ECS many times but I still have a hard time to see what you're referring to. What are the similarities?