skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think the mailing list approach would work for giant projects that have many bullshit PRs and issues, and you want to deter the “hello please fix it on my pc” stuff. Not really for small projects where each PR is usually helpful.

I have no idea what is kyoto and if it fits there.
Although validator earnings will be single digit percentages in ether per year, isn't that just the block reward, and all of the transaction fees are also split?

With higher throughput, more strategies that once again saturate the block space, that could be more lucrative than it seems?
"It was as if a light had been Nookd…" (https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=3994)
It’s mostly low-level IT people with no domain expertise.
Citing Digiconomist numbers is really undermining the credibility of this article. de Vries’s work has been debunked and shown to be garbage literally every time he publishes something (he is a low-level EU central banker, so not really a great authority).

If you want to use something, this is much more credible from Cambridge University (showing radically different numbers): https://ccaf.io/cbeci/index

For an example on what digiconmist gets wrong (there are many!): https://bitcoinmagazine.com/business/not-science-digiconomis...
It's not fair to just say [financial institutions power consumption] vs bitcoin as financial institutions do not protect their assets. Governments with militaries protect the fiat assets and the power consumption of a military strength necessary to stabilize a fiat currency might be substantial.
Maastricht University recovers ransom from hackers with large profit
What is the point of saying this? My interpretation is this accuses OP of being delusional about their attractiveness or lying to us.

How is your "observation" supposed to help?

Regardless, I posit that marrying someone you're not attracted to is not a good idea if you want a happy and fulfilling life. You're going to be spending a lot, lot, lot of time with them. It's a recipe for resentment, which is fatal to relationships.
Which should be her first keyboard? Piano or computer?
How did this get through?
I don’t know Drew DeVault personally, but I feel from his blog that he’s fairly transparent and not interested in attempting to squeeze out every possible cent of profit from sourcehut. I may be proven wrong in the future, but for now I’m happy with the service and hopeful that it will remain affordable, friendly, and fast.
Aws batch is a terrible product
Do you have any close male friends? What is their advice? Do they have single male friends to introduce you to?

What has gone wrong in previous dating relationships? Nothing stuck? Ghosted?

Marriage is a game of 'good enough' not soulmates, and I think a lot of chagrin over the whole thing comes from this.

You've come to the right forum for being given advice by a bunch of men. Good luck
> I've heard the argument that if you take into account all the human-associated energy costs Bitcoin's energy use compared to a company like Visa would be comparable. Now I'm not so sure.

The amount of misinformation around crypto energy usage has been out of control in the past few years. It's still weird to dip into an HN comment section and see people spreading the false claim that mining is powered by renewable energy sources that would otherwise go to waste (an absurd claim on every level) or that Bitcoin is somehow a "store of energy". The extreme energy inefficiency of cryptocurrencies is well-documented and doesn't even come close to any other financial system.

> Perhaps the goal shouldn't be to minimize energy use but to maximize energy output.

The real goal is to minimize harmful emissions. If we had some hypothetical infinite clean energy source then mining wouldn't be a big deal. However, even when mining is colocated with renewable energy sources, that renewable energy is prevented from going into the grid and offsetting fossil-fuel power plants.
So GitHub should immediately take down (and remove from their Copilot learning model!) all *GPL code uploaded by anyone but the ("primary"?) copyright holder.
You mean consulting?
Keep in mind this is all hypothetical and these numbers are not based in any reality. The foundation cites a random wordpress blog on these numbers. (really?)

Even if this merge is done, a greener pyramid scheme doesn’t change anything about the speculators and scams that Ethereum harbours as Ethereum becomes even more centralised and plutocratic.

Gas fee surges will always still be a problem after the merge which only favours the rich that can afford them making Ethereum useless at scale for on chain usecases.
I've just measured it with wattmeter. Xeon E5-2697v2, 64GB ram, SSD + 2x HDD, GTX1080. Excluding monitor, that might add another 15W according to its "energy usage bar" which sits at about 25%.

110W "idle" with firefox running + few opengl programs.

160W at steam startup, then it jumps between 120W and 160W. It stabilizes at 110W in about 2 minutes.

130-230W when compiling emacs (takes about 30 seconds).

150W when loading Facebook in Firefox. Then stable at 110W again.

175W-180W running Prison Architect. Very safe to add another 220W when running GPU heavy game (thats not very relevant here, new GPUs consumes ~same or more power).

I'd say my "randomly guessed" 130W amortized is pretty OK.
And remember, this guess was for reference only, scale it to your needs.

Of course it can get higher when having a lot of things up and running, with a lot of active tabs in firefox.
It’s not regular person negotiating 50,000 employee health plans that cost $500,000,000 per year.

I’m pretty sure a lower premium with higher deductible isn’t going to fool them.
Google blackholes many sites and they don't get indexed.
Miniflux – Minimalist and opinionated feed reader writen in Go
I like “from A to B” because B happens after A temporally and in the text. It also serves to emphasize A as opposed to B, which is nice because we usually wouldn’t leave A unless there was really a problem with it even if B is better in some way.
Well, let me start by reflecting a few things back at you that I've noticed you said.

- it sounds like you have no problem doing self work (therapy, meditation, working out, etc)

- it sounds like you have no problem trying new strategies around relationships

- it sounds like you have no problem getting first dates

So, it seems like the main problem is taking a potential partner, forming a serious relationship with them, and getting to the marriage point. The good news is you only need to do this successfully once. So it sounds like the deep question you need to solve is, why aren't any of these attempts working out?

I'd say the best advice I could offer for this is to follow up with people you've gone out with, and ask them why it didnt work out, and genuinely listen to what they say. You could say something like "Hey, I know it didnt work out between us, and that's okay. I'm seriously looking for a partner, and I've been struggling. Could you tell me more about what our interaction/relationship/date experience (pick the best term for the person here) looked like from your perspective? I think feedback you could give me would be help, and I'd be really appreciative"

For more misc advice I'd also say

- It sounds like youre spending a lot of time trying a lot of things and going on a lot of dates. Maybe try scaling things back so youre putting more effort into fewer things that have a higher potential. So it sounds like you have very clear relationship goals (marriage, kids, etc). I'd be very upfront about that (maybe mention it on apps, but at least on the first date 100% for sure). Cause like if they dont have the same goals, or are unsure, probably both people's time is getting wasted

- Check out the youtube channel healthgamergg. Its done by a guy who was a former yogi, and now is a physiatrist. The content is very therapy related, but he talks a lot about people who have a hard time with relationships. I think the quality of the stuff he makes is extremely high, and I've gotten a lot of value from it personally, so maybe you might as well.
Edit: Never mind, my calculations were definitely wrong.
I get the point, but maybe that looking desperate puts people off, so being more relaxed could help. I recall being dismay that when single no one showed interest, while in a relationship women seems to ask me out (still rarely, but not 0)... Long story short I think the message is don't be too intense, but be honest you're looking for a relationship and not a hookup.
TL;DR Relying on performant swap doesn’t work any longer because they crippled storage bandwidth in the newer/cheaper model.

Deliberate? Hard to know but probably supports a higher average selling price.
Could you elaborate why Glibc isn't any better?

I remember some funny problems with Glibc, like, 20 years ago, but it's been invisible to me (as a user) since then. You get a new Glibc, old binaries still work, it's fine.
The title of this article is ridiculous and inaccurate.
Also, is it slow because it’s badly implemented, or is it better than other mallocs in some other respect? Maybe, dating from decades ago, it’s better in the memory usage front?
I wish you the best luck. My advice for the children part is: this is deeply personal and everyone is different, for me personally biological children would be out of the question at that age (esp given no current long-term partner). However there’s other options.

My sister had a 2 yo and was pregnant of 7 months when her husband had a sudden heart failure and passed away. It was as dramatic as you imagine.

She rebuilt her life, eventually meeting her current partner, a great guy who loves has her and her two children. They are a happy family, he is their dad.

Life throws hard balls sometimes, but it also surprises you. I guess my hack is “keep your eyes open, you might not get the limousine you wanted but you could get a tank instead, and tank are quite cool”.

I also think it would help if you mentioned something about why you think none of the previous 120 candidates didn’t work out.

Again, best of luck.
Better safe than sorry. Likewise user “mtklein” should exercise caution. She may be after his carma. You’d be surprised to what lengths people go just to be able to downvote or flag others on here. o_O

/jk
> Ethereum's energy consumption will be reduced by ~99.95% following The Merge from proof-of-work (PoW) to proof-of-stake (PoS). After The Merge, Ethereum will use dramatically less carbon to be more secure.

How many years has it been, at this point? I distinctly recall "imminent" plans to switch over to PoS as early as 2019.
I've read that a lot of former ETH miners have sold or are planning to sell their rigs (I think this is related to the submission yesterday about the GPU shortage being over[1], as Ethereum is usually mined on GPUs)

We'll see if it plays out, but cryptocurrency prices falling have certainly reduced the energy consumption as well (it becomes less profitable to mine at a given difficulty when your mining reward is worth less).

If Ethereum does eventually manage to overtake Bitcoin, that'll bode well for crypto's energy footprint in the long term (fingers crossed for this happening, or at least for there to not be another Bitcoin/PoW bubble)

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31953662
The issue here, along with all 'modern' construction methods (eg sips) is that without 50 or so years of data it's nearly impossible to get home insurance at a reasonable rate, and no insurance means no mortgage.
I worked with Symbian and it’s now dead. It lost the mobile OS race for a reason.
Back when I was the Testbed Manager for the Defense Systems Information Agency DISANet LAN, one of the things we were going to be doing was deploying over 50 servers in different data centers around the world, some of which would be in classified environments. We needed some reliable UPSes for some of those environments, because not all of the data centers had reliable power.

We looked at several brands, and one of them was APC. We bought them from the various vendors, instead of having them sent to us by their sales people, so that we would have a more representative idea of what it would be like to actually own a fleet of these things. One thing that impressed me about APC was that they seemed to be smaller but more ruggedly built than any of the others we were looking at. Unfortunately, when I plugged that unit in, it sounded like a chainsaw.

So, I called up the company, and explained who I was and what we were doing. Not much reaction from the tech support person I was talking to. Then I told them what the problem was. They told me to ship it back to them (on our dime), and they'd look at it. I tried to explain again who I was and what we were doing, but they stayed on script.

Then I got a bright idea and told them to wait while I held out the phone to let them hear what it sounded like. As I was bringing the phone back to my ear, what I heard was "... pping out by Federal Express, next day air". Lo and behold, the replacement did actually arrive at the office next day, with instructions to mail back the failed unit at our leisure and all expenses paid by APC. And the replacement was quiet. We bought 50 of them -- one for each server. So far as I know, they never failed.

I've continued to be a loyal APC customer ever since 1993, and the one and only problem I've ever had with any of them over the decades has been that the batteries sometimes need to be replaced. But spares of those types are kept in stock by every Batteries Plus or Microcenter store that I've seen here in the US. Less than five minutes to replace them.

I do go for the SmartUPS line, over the BackUPS. And I buy units that I can guarantee will give me extended run times on 15amp circuits.

Worth every penny.
Google already doesn't index the entire Internet. The internet even having a size becomes more questionable the more you think about it.

Let's say we set up a wildcard domain *.example.com all pointing to a server set up so that

0.example.com/ has a link to 0.example.com/0 and 1.example.com/
0.example.com/0 has a link to 0.example.com/1 and 0.example.com/0/0
0.example.com/0/0 has a link to 0.example.com/0/1 and 0.example.com/0/0/0
1.example.com/ has a link to 1.example.com/1 and 2.example.com/
1.example.com/0 has a link to 1.example.com/1 and 1.example.com/0/0

and so forth.

This way even a raspberry pi is able to trivially host an infinite number of infinite websites.
But Ethereum mining rewards are orders of magnitude greater than the mining rewards for all of the altcoins (combined). The attack cost on this page [0] is a good reference for the relative mining incentive.

Given this, a LOT of mining capacity is going to go offline when this occurs.

[0] https://www.crypto51.app/
I think this web is still there somewhere, it's just that in the meantime FAANG et consortes started expanding at an exponential rate, so on one hand there's a lot more web out there, on the other the fraction of it that looks like the old web fell drastically.
A) Austin is not really a great city for somone single in their 40s--especially female. There's just too many young people you're competing against because of both the University and the "Live Music Scene". In addition, becasue you're in Texas, you've got a bunch of religious-affiliated men who will likely screen you out for various reasons (education, mostly). Some place like Pittsburgh would probably be better.

B) One question you need to ask yourself is: Do you really have your list of wants adjusted to a realistic level.

I can't find the video now (we'll see if HN can pull it up :) ), but there was a woman (from University of Pennsylvania? Statistics department?) who decided that she would apply her statistics knowledge to dating.

When she listed her desired characteristics, she calculated that there were a total of 3 men in all of Philadelphia who would match--of which 2 of them were likely married already.

That was pretty eye opening to her. It doesn't take many characteristics before you've screened out practically everyone.

After fixing that, she applied her statistics to adjusting her dating profile to start matching her with the people she wanted and was quite a bit more successful in her endeavors.

Good luck.
Highlights from the results:

1. Git Is the King: The Use of Git Is Increasing Year by Year

2. Version Control Universe: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps

3. Docker Usage Is Increasing Year by Year

4. Docker and Kubernetes Are in Every Developer’s Toolbox

5. Communication Matters: Developers Love Slack

6. You Probably Have Knowledge Silos As Productivity Killers

7. Smaller Organizations Often Tend to Be in the Office

8. Developer Experience: Processes, Tools, and Programs Within an Organization

Read More: https://betterprogramming.pub/stack-overflow-2022-developer-...
What do you mean by "Unix"? Are you talking about some specific Unix version, or is there something in the POSIX spec that says that libc isn't a library?
Could the post title be edited to reflect the reality a bit more?
Wrong laptop photo.

Article is about M2 MacBook Pro yet they use a MacBook Air photo.
These things are like "Why I left Google" from 2010s.
Because without the need to be profitable, you get gross incompetence, corruption, and waste. See: California HSR, BART expansion, NYC subway expansion.

The power of the market forces private businesses to offer quality service. A privately run subway would never allow drug addicts and thieves run rampant on the train like they're allowed to in NYC and the Bay.

Pro tip: if I feel scared for my life or property at any point during a transit, you've already lost against a car.
I do find redux super helpful for undo/redo (as mentioned in the article) and have not found a similar library for another state management solution that can do quite what I need there.
People working on crypto also drive around and do things? Which would make the crypto numbers equally larger. It would presumably take as many humans to run a kind of crypto-Visa as it would take to run regular Visa. Crypto isn't somehow automating some human-intensive activity. The big numbers on crypto is just the algo costs. So your whole argument is kind of terrible?
You're right, it's either Amsterdam or remote.
Let’s start with the unpleasant. You are old and female. The best catches, as relationship minded males, are off the game board. Secondly, as an old female your expectations are likely unrealistic compared to what’s available yet simultaneously the more you date the more exhausted and desperate you will get.

The pleasant: Since you are an older single professional you have money, which means you have options. You also have your educational and career history which should provide you an awareness of the world and people that younger people don’t have, but then this assumption is only 50/50 as there are plenty of older people who are single because they are borderline autistic.

I strongly recommend not being too reliant on dating apps to meet people. All old single people do this out of desperation/convenience, which pools the desperate people together. It takes more work, especially if you are low in extroversion, to meet real people in the real world but your odds are so much better. Set your expectations low, relax, and try to have fun with it. The best benefit of being single is the freedom to do things married people with kids can’t, so keep trying to meet real people and not rush it.
I don’t trust proof of stake, mostly because loads of people who I consider irrational want it to work so desperately.

Proof-of-work actually does work - it is no longer a debate, and these people (many of the same people who were saying “b-b-but tulips” a couple years ago) can’t stand it. I wouldn’t trust them to engineer their way out of a paper bag - definitely not after some muppet on the TV reminds them to get back in line.

Capitalism is still winning again, folks. Deal with it.
+1 Yes, safety first.

We can be safe, but the world isn't safe.
Time management. Work, rising youngest and teach elders is really challenge.

What is more reasonable for me is educate children in smaller group of parents, that want do homeschooling and than have ie one day per week just for teaching a small group of children among our friends. Also this could be more connected to professions of parents.
Something here it not computing. They said Ethereum energy consumption is similar to the Netherlands. This would mean a single coal planet can power the Netherlands 35 times over. Some numbers are definitely wrong here.
This is probably true. The first part of the GP's post (about unnecessary pollution) does apply however.
Proof-of-Stake doesn't solve the Byzantine General's Problem. Therefore, the system no longer has the property of being able to get decentralized consensus
Absolutely. I submit a lot of FOIA requests and one of the biggest limiting factors in access to the records I need comes from people new to the job who haven't been given full training on how to get records. It very much feels like as a FOIA requester, we're training them ourselves.
The dictionary’s job is to describe you how words are used, not prescribe definitions.
JavaScipt on the browser is cursed[1].

1. There is no standard GUI library, as per article. A GUI can be as arbitrarily complex as you wish, and every different frontend system is a unique GUI system deployed in JavaScript, usually using HTML for the view drawing primitives* and events for input. The complexities of GUI library design bubble up to developers who are implementing their own tweaks or combinations of a GUI library, usually with a huge amount of “needless” variation. Application developers should ideally never have to be making choices about internals of a GUI system, yet the core of most articles comparing frontend frameworks is discussing GUI internals.

2. There is no golden standard for tooling. Everyone has their pet variations on how to deploy to JavaScript, CSS, and HTML.

3. Back end choice. Huge variation.

As a developer we get APIs on the edges, but we make our own spaghetti to join everything how we wish because there is not one or two standard library/framework choices, and we have the power to do what we will. I developed my own 100% custom component framework because I could write one that suited us far better than what was available at the time (OSS or commercial). Browser variation used to be a huge driver for complexity, but is far less so now.

* drawing primitives can also be Canvas or SVG or WebGL e.g. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27131659 is a good comment.

[1] https://www.google.co.nz/search?q=lisp+curse
As I write this comment, the Digiconomist estimates for the Bitcoin network is 129.74 TWh

The Cambridge University estimate for the Bitcoin network is 92.93 TWh with a lower bound of 51.01 TWh and an upper bound of 153.61 TWh. (I don't see an Ethereum comparison on the Cambridge site, so I can't check those numbers)

Given that the Digiconomist estimate is within the bounds of the Cambridge estimate, I don't see how this is really a debunking. I'm not really inclined to put too much faith into an article from "Bitcoin Magazine" on the topic when a quick look at the numbers shows that the two primary sources don't really disagree and have similar estimates.
Why is this being downvoted?!
Hard to say, they are both owned by the same company though [1], so there is for sure a conflict of interest. Still a good place to look for red flags, as even the most determined company can't bury all bad reviews.

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recruit_(company)
It's the title of the original source and written by the Managing Editor of the website.

Flag the article and maybe everyone should be more careful about giving them traffic in the future.
BMC64 is a bare metal fork of VICE's C64 emulator optimized for the Raspberry Pi