skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Might have been blocked due to Anti-Russia ISP in which chess website was hosted at.
>You could bridge it via C

*Objective-C++
Was just going to say this. Although, it's not specific to Intel assembly. Many assembly languages use the syntax: move destination,origin
When your validator is chosen to produce a block the client software asks flashbots for a list of transactions to include at the front of the block and you get paid for that. The validators produce blocks in a similar manner as miners do.
I just found out the US DoE fronted $1.4B of taxpayers' money to some utility to turn around and hand over to NuScale.

China will mothball its nukes as their power gets undercut by renewables. We have great difficulty mothballing expensive stuff, so instead continue operating them at a net loss for years, making ratepayers or taxpayers pony up the difference.
Not sure if I understand the question, but yeah it's all about single thread performance. Around 2017 or so, old server processors had decent single core performance and very good multithreaded performance for workstation workloads compared to the desktop hardware of the day.

Nowadays, old server processors have very poor single threaded performance compared to recent desktop grade hardware, and the much larger amount of cores fails to compensate for that in pretty much all workstation loads. Especially considering that you can get a lot of cores in desktop hardware nowadays too. The relative value of desktop hardware vs server hardware has gone up substantially in the past 5 years or so, since Intel started making server chips focused exclusively on the demands of large scale data centers and AMD started normalizing high core counts in desktop chips.

Because cheap second hand server chips are sourced from data centers, that inherently favor high core counts and only baseline single thread performance, I don't see a future where we have cheap server processors ever being a great choice for a workstation again. Quick-ish single thread server chips do exist (e.g. Epyc 72F3), but I think those are too niche to ever see them for a good deal on eBay.
the way it generates specific art styles and textures is amazing. it's interesting to try and spot out subtle details that it misses/ignores entirely (who is drinking diet coke out of a mug? why are the mummies interpreted as skeletons in sock-raincoats?)
New $6 Raspberry Pi Pico Adds WiFi, and Possibly Bluetooth
Men are not picky. It’s weird to lump people into categories like ‘marriageable’ and choose someone because they’re educated. People have much more important properties in a relationship. Someone with a trusting and caring nature will be a million times better partner than one who only has some cool PhD.
if a larger number of people purchased the product only after the campaign started, even if GP didn't purchase, the campaign has worked.
And how exactly do you plan to avoid the flash of white without SSar?
No thanks, my life is even more amazing.
I’m very relieved that we have finally seen the sense in about 75% of the stuff Kent Beck wrote down in ‘99. Not that he invented most of those things, because a lot of them were done somewhere in isolation in the 80’s but more seeing the complimentary nature. That doing 6 things could be 8 times as good as doing none of them. When the refactoring book came out some of us said, “oh yeah, so that’s what you call that” and half the people said “that’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever seen, why would I ever waste my time doing that?” I still meet people like this, but many try to keep it to themselves.

Kanban seemed so intuitive that I accidentally made a kanban board in 1995, when the only thing I knew about Japan was tiny trees.

But really the biggest thing for me was that I was poorly served by the education system and spent my first few years thinking there was something wrong with me instead of something wrong with them, so you ten I was having introspective conversations with myself and by twelve overhearing other frustrated learners and interjecting things like, “yeah that didn’t make sense to me at all until I thought of it this way”.

The teachers who say they learn as much as their students aren’t lying (or at least not all of them). Watching - actually watching- people struggle with things teaches you a lot about that thing, that person, and people in general (problem solving and task management). Being able to take a proposed solution and extrapolate on whether this will help or hurt a lot of people. Most only get as far as whether it’ll be awesome for them or horrible, and sometimes they’re wrong.

What’s difficult though is that you see is that what people think they know and how they know it is usually wrong, for better and for worse. Most people aren’t open to hearing that until they are well and truly stuck. There are people who make their whole life about helping people with this. One of the advantages they have is that they are not personally invested in your experience, because they aren’t sharing in it. Whereas your coworkers are either stuck in it with you, or seen as distant and uncaring because they aren’t getting upset too.
> I don’t understand why Bitcoin mining is incompatible with emissions reduction. It sounds like an additional source of demand may make economical plants that otherwise could not be built.

Some years ago, there was a book published where the author systematically looked at the energy consumption (not just the of the UK and compared it to the total possible renewable energy sources therein. He found that even if you covered every hectare of the UK with solar panels, sent every raindrop through hydro power plants to extract energy as it runs to the sea, etc., it still would not provide enough renewable energy to satisfy UK consumption.

Switching existing energy sources to renewable isn't sufficient to avoid climate change; we need to reduce aggregate energy consumption. And that means that Bitcoin mining, adding a massive energy sink where one did not previously exist, is doing the exact opposite of what needs to be done.
Please elaborate. What makes you think it does not?
I go every year.
Unfortunately this suffers from compounded niche-ness. Even with huge interest and constant public f-ups from social media companies, the Fediverse has failed to gain any real traction (likely due to the unintuitiveness of cross-server identity).

GitHub is already niche for the general populace, most people haven’t heard of it. Among programmers, alternative SCM platforms outside of GitLab and Perforce are niche. When we multiply the two together we get an incredibly small set of potential users (and the UX challenges of ActivityPub are still there).
Are they substantially cheaper? That’s what I need right now.
No. Knowing whether programs end in finite time (dependent on input) doesn't mean all programs end or that all programs end in constant time.

The halting problem is also not considered unsolved (though P=NP is unsolved).
The whole Node “works on my laptop” thing can be mostly resolved by ensuring that unit / intg tests run as a prerequisite for merging on a separate CI system with a clean (as in no existing node_modules) build workspace each time. It’s almost always down to bad package.json / package-lock.json practices // mixing in global packages.
100% most facetious post evah!
I just ran Speedometer 2.0 on Chrome on macOS:

Single core: 61.1
4 cores: 73.7

Speedometer tests a bunch of ToDO MVC apps in many popular frameworks.
It's very heavy on DOM manipulation, parsing, painting, etc.
It's the hard to parallelize stuff and stuff that's supposed to represent real world usage.

JetStream 2 is easier to multithread since it plays with Web Workers and other tricks, but still, results are depressing:

Single core: 54.4
4 cores: 82
That's true of course to some extent, but I don't think the trend will continue on quite as drastically.

Like sure, you have games nowadays like RDR2, CoD, that have inflated to absurd file sizes of up to like 200 GB, compared to only a few gigs for AAA games maybe 10 years ago, but you also for examplehave more powerful hardware and more advanced compression like x265 which can store vastly more video in a lot less space than it was ever possible before since it can be decoded and unpacked in real time.

It used to take 4.7 GB of a DVD to hold a single movie at an abysmal 480p resolution, whereas nowadays you can pack a full HD one in easily a quarter of that size. I'm sure this will get even more extreme as processing power increases.
Fun fact: Txdot, who spends 97% of their entire massive budget on expanding freeways, is responsible for .5% of all global carbon emissions.
The good news is a lot of this is easily fixed, by learning what's important and what isn't in your pursuit of romance!

>By most cultural standards, according to my male friends, I’m smart,

This is pretty irrelevant, even if true, which is always suspect coming from guys. It's also a very common BS compliment.

> beautiful,

If guys are using the B word, it probably means you are not attractive/hot/sexy, which is what the vast majority of guys care about. So, that should probably be your first priority to rectify. To quickly go through the rest of what you seemingly find relevant to matchmaking:

"Fit"—this only matters if it makes you hot, or if you are so un-fit you are debilitated or extremely not-hot. "Kind"—this is nice; a lot of guys enjoy spending time around actually kind/selfless women, but it's also given as a very common BS compliment. "Emotionally mature"—irrelevant; you only have to be not-insane. "Doing meaningful work"—200% irrelevant; guys do not need you to do meaningful work, and it does not make you more attractive to them if you're doing it.

>Over the last two years I’ve been on over 120 dates with men I’ve met online - a few I met in person - in 3 different cities .

This right here means your problem is your expectations, or a wildly effective set of red flags scaring everybody off. Men are easy, so it's probably the former.

>I’ve deeply invested myself in therapy, support groups, meditation, dating coaching, ... and hypnotism.

You obviously need to stop all that, because it isn't working. Also, it probably makes you look nuts.

>yoga

This, is actually productive. It's healthy, and very tangential to Hot for a lot of guys.

>I’ve read and done the exercises in Calling In the One, Love Addiction, Datonomics, Make Your Move and If the Buddha dated. I’ve listened to every episode of Girls Gotta Eat.

You should definitely stop this, as well. The wisdom you're gleaning from them is obviously terrible, if you went on dates with 120 guys and got nowhere.

>I’ve gone to CrossFit and hung out at steakhouses. I’ve dated every profession you can think of from doctors to electricians and unemployed guys.

Good experience, but useless in the long run if you don't also fix your broken expectations, and reorient your objectives towards what guys are actually attracted to.

If you want to know what would actually make a guy consider a long term relationship with you, ask a basic guy's-guy what he would say if another guy asked the question; or better yet, have a guy ask the question to begin with. There will always be a filter between guys and you, telling them to answer questions like that in a false, socially acceptable manner.

TL;DR —

1) Reevaluate yourself, through the lens of what guys care about(attractiveness, youth, comfort at home, humor and wit, sensuality, mutual interests), to understand what league you probably need to be looking in.

2) Cultivate those things guys care about. Cultivate interests guys-you-like tend to have.

3) Identify guys you would like a future with — they should be at least ~2%+ of men your age — and actually, actively pursue that future with them.
Much of what you've said is actually quite true.

Does the "wow" factor wear off and leave too little benefit to overcome the downsides? Yes, for a lot of people that is the case. I've witnessed it in many of my friends who I convinced to get a VR headset, absolutely sure that it would become their main source of gaming, only to see them barely use it outside of a couple games for a couple hours a week. Some of that is due to the lack of good content, but some of it is inherent to the discomfort and difficulty "getting into" VR.

I'm an outlier I guess. Much of what VR offers syncs with my life now. I don't play competitive multiplayer games as much as I used to. I'm starting to prefer longer form and immersive content. Single player games are actually enjoyable and not completely boring, when in VR. Gaming sessions are naturally time boxed, due to issues of eye strain and general discomfort in VR. I don't want to game for hours on end anymore and VR provides a natural mechanism for that. 1-2 hours a day, and I'm good.

But those are fairly unique attributes and qualities to be looking for in a gaming platform and definitely do not represent what traditional gamers are attracted to. There remains an enormous swath of young men (and increasingly women) who want ultra competitive and comfortable gaming which provides boundless opportunity to sit and consume. VR likely struggles for another simple reason which is most people's tolerance to simply stand for more than an hour is quite small.

All of that said ... I still think this its early and there's enough benefit in VR that I have a very hard time seeing it going away completely. It might never catch on as a gaming platform, but for seated content like work, I could see it being a great solution if / when the technology improves.
I have 14 ft ceilings in most of my house. It’s great other than the heating and cooling bill.
to me its obvious amazon managers intentionally avoid giving us such a delete all resources button simply to maximize profits
Been promising this for years with no results
Not sure about the "men are hypo-selective" aspect you claim, but the rest of what you wrote really resonates with me- I learned profession really doesn't matter, in fact people in highly competitive fields tend to be the worst in relationships. They already made their choice when they made the crazy high commitment.

Doctors and VPs at Tesla or other major companies were almost universally less fun dates and overall emotionally unavailable, with only one exception out of dozens for me. I was a little disappointed to reality this but once I accepted and incorporated it into my selections, things improved vastly.
Read his comment as Bitcoin specifically not crypto generically.
Eh, as maintainer, I'd say the complaints about "boilerplate" were generally pretty accurate :)

As I've talked about in a couple posts and presentations [0] [1], there's a distinction between "inherent" and "incidental" complexity. Dispatching actions and using reducers is "inherent" - it's part of Redux, and you can't remove that because then it's not Redux. But things like writing `const ADD_TODO = "ADD_TODO"`, object spreads, etc, aren't _necessary_ for using Redux - they're inherent complexity.

Which is why we wrote Redux Toolkit to fix all that incidental complexity :)

Redux still won't ever be as few lines of code as various other libs, but writing Redux code today is much simpler than it was previously... and yes, the _benefits_ of Redux (predictable code, debugging, separation of state updates, middleware) are still entirely valuable.

[0] https://blog.isquaredsoftware.com/2022/06/presentations-mode...

[1] https://blog.isquaredsoftware.com/2019/10/redux-toolkit-1.0/
The loss of attribution, for example, is going to become an issue. Especially since copilot barfs out code chunks verbatim at times.

And either way, it's time to yet again to step around Microsoft's interference in the beautiful world of open source.
A.I. should not be used for law enforcement because it just creates an infinite pretext for whatever they want to do that would otherwise require probable cause, reasonable suspicion, presenting a case to a prosecutor or a judge, and all the other inconvieniences your inalieable rights create for them.

Law enforcement use cases for machine learning are nothing more than a laundering of accountability for individual decisions. The whole notion of algorithms being somehow autonomous is the most pernicious and magically anthropomorphic falsehood supposedly smart people believe, imo. I did a privacy impact assessment many years ago for a government agency who planned to outsource their benefits fraud detection to an "AI" as a service, and the service just happen to be run by a credit bureau company, effectively giving complete benefits and other personal information "for analysis" to a literal scumbag consumer credit reporting company. The project managers were trying to convince me and everyone else that somehow this data would not get re-used and integrated into the credit agencies other data sets and resold among the others - because "they're using AI, nobody there is going to see this data."

I think similar law enforcement use cases for "AI" are just as magically stupid.
Second, shorter reply:

> I don't understand the choice to use GPL for any reason

No, you just don't understand the GPL.

Or, for some reason, pretend not to.
I'm glad this conversation played out productively and respectfully - another reason why I enjoy this site.

For what it's worth, I initially misunderstood your statement that "being focused and having lots of random interests are mutually exclusive" in the same way that the other commenter did, as implying that someone with a life outside of work cannot be a good employee. I see now that you were stressing the "_lots of random_" part of the statement (that is - if you have 20 different "passions" in a month, you cannot truly be said to be focused on any of them) - in this case, I agree!

> a very senior guy [...] famously once rejected the team's top choice because the guy had claimed to be fluent in a particular (natural) language on his CV, and then turned out to be anything but...

Wow - an extreme, but defensible, position! Integrity is important.

> if you do MMA, they may be more mixed

Pun intentional? ;)
Association of intake of non-sugar sweeteners&health outcomes: systematic review
(Sorry, I edited my comment and removed the game reference and optimization question before I saw your comment.)

I mean, sure but the DOM is not even a factor compared to the actual WebGL rendering going on. The DOM is only used for UI, menus and things like that. So the bottleneck would still not be React or how I handle state.
I am responding from bottom to top.

1. Hacks won't do it. You don't hack through life, and if that's your attitude, changing it might help you achieve what you are trying to achieve.

2. If you are willing to do almost everything, I suggest Church-hunting—try to find a suitable religious man. No, I am not joking. If you want my reasoning , you may contact me.

3. I suggest you have a kid either way—it is difficult, but worth it. If you “run out of time”, adopt.

4. Do not make rush decisions based on obscure possibilities.

5. You are probably looking in the wrong crowd. Or are being picky.

6. Take a moment back, and decide how you want to move forward. If you take advice from anyone, take it from a married couple.

My contacts for "internet people": vhjjgf.mob93@simplelogin.co
I wonder if he was running with the debugger attached; we also saw atrocious performance with MSVCRT malloc until we set _NO_DEBUG_HEAP=1 in our environment.
The conclusion I take away from their charts is that we should use PayPal?
A company booth for the enjoyment of a select few.
I'm aware, i had my bright idea years ago, around the time of this tweet:

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1064741356080222209?t=It...
We do not need a "fantastic" storage system. Ordinary dirt-cheap storage will do fine. Batteries are the most expensive alternative.

Of course it would be stupid to build out storage until after there is enough renewable generating capacity to charge it from. In the meantime, money is overwhelmingly better spent pushing toward that goal.

When the time is right to build out storage, it will be very cheap, as storage cost is falling faster than solar ever did.
Those improvements have been done, decades ago and now. They’re called Generation III / III+ and Generation IV reactors. How are such improvements not enough?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_III_reactor
Does Kyoto license explicitly forbid the code from being cloned to GitHub? If not, seems like at best buying time until someone else does.
That's an interesting take but there's not really any protection in current open source licenses to stop someone else from agreeing to GitHub or any other hosting's terms for their clone of your repo.
Yes, I do find it interesting that it's only finally happening now that the price of ETH is tanking. I wonder if the miners were paying bribes to keep their monopoly this long.
> The Supreme Court is comprised of lifelong appointees, mostly in the dwindling twilight of their cognitive ability. This made sense when we didn't understand cognitive decline. Now with the rapid pace of technological progress, it's a joke.

The Supreme Court is not that old. Only two are in their (early) 70s, and three are in their 50s. John Roberts, the median aged judge, and is about the same age as Bill Gates.

And you're wrong about the science. Crystallized intelligence grows with age and is stable into one's 70s. Vocabulary, for example, peaks in one's late 60's and early 70's. https://news.mit.edu/2015/brain-peaks-at-different-ages-0306

Fluid intelligence peaks at age 20, but judges aren't being tested on their ability to solve timed logic puzzles.

> The whole legal rationalist ideal that you can start from the base principles of the constitution and reason up indefinitely is ridiculous.

I agree it's ridiculous. The Constitution is a rulebook, not a set of principles to use as a starting point. "What would these words have meant to the people who wrote them?" That's how we interpret any other document. It's not hard.
That’s legalese boilerplate. It might be useful for actually legal disputes, but I don’t think it has much use for public relations. It could be prudent to have similar sentiments included in more familiar ways in the regular project description.

But perhaps more importantly, if you really feel that your software “has no implied fitness for a particular purpose”. Don't do keynotes and conference talks claiming the opposite.
> I've seen other examples of creators doing great work who are seemingly impossible to dislike, and STILL receive harassment to a point of not wanting to continue (e.g. Handmade Hero)

Are you saying that Casey Muratori is "seemingly impossible to dislike"? Isn't he still doing HH?
Thats very cool! This videotapednterview from keysight is an interesting dive in his lab!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0Bb53Vd2aA