skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> CI is often triggered by creating a pull request to merge a branch into main.

> Today, a developer would be crazy to suggest anything other than git and trunk-based development for a project.

My understanding is that trunk-based development is about shipping a feature via multiple merges of incremental changes that are often single commits; the main opposing model is feature-branch-based development, and it's with the latter model that the terms "pull request" and even "branch" are associated. Is my description of the terminology accurate and is the author of this article using the terminology confusingly?
I am describing human damage mitigation in the event of a side impact crash. No AEB system operates in that situation.

https://youtu.be/C15IYntlmvo
Just a heads up, you can search Github here too:

https://github.com/search

https://github.com/search/advanced
It's not as simple as that. There's no just "extending" the IPv4 stack unless you're going to "extend" every device that supports IPv4 with it. By that point you'd might as well just have IPv6.
Apple has signaled that SwiftUI is where they are going and will continue iterating on it for many years to come. They are like old-school Microsoft in that way. Version one is certain to be incomplete, but they will stick with it over the long haul.

Apple certainly has done a much better job of picking a development strategy and iterating on it than Microsoft has over the past couple of decades.
I get where you were coming from but corrupt lawyers landed my handicapped brother in an unlicensed group home where he was mistreated and soon died. Lawyers can absolutely kill you.
This is like complaining about driving on the highway because there are billboards everywhere. Focus on bigger things.
[dupe] https://hn.algolia.com/?q=Ruja+Ignatova
Dear Board of Directors and any executives....just stop. Stop being cheap, lazy, unprofessional, and taking the most tired solutions to task....you are greedy, Ill-advised, and lacking any foresight into the technicals except from yes men who surround you.....just stop it

you cannot built technology...stop ruining it with your greed!
Flag the post…
Most of the current collection is from manure.

Methane is lighter than oxygen and azote, so you should be able to collect some at the highest point of an air-tight roof of a cow shed. Not sure how much that would represent compared to manure.
For text to speech, there are a locally processed options from providers such as RH Voice and Mycroft AI. For voice recognition, I am not aware of any local processing options. Of course Apple, MS, and Amazon have ones that process on their computers. I personally don't have a need for voice recognition and have not researched.
The Sinking of Voyager
> It’s amazing what governments can do when they really want to…

When the get PAID TO, you mean.
Here's the thing: we have hundreds of thousands of teams and organizations who currently each need to select and define those processes.

Perhaps some of those teams and individuals are experts at determining the correct, minimal continuous integration suite to run on a per-commit basis to minimize time and energy expenditure without compromising correctness.

But I can guarantee that not all (in fact, not many) are, and that they pay maintenance and mental overheads to adhere to those practices.

It feels to me like there is a potentially massive opportunity to design an integrated language-and-infrastructure environment that only re-runs necessary checks based on each code diff.

- "Altered a single-line docstring in a Python file? OK, the data-flow from that infers a rebuild of one of our documentation pages is required, let's do that... done in 2ms"

- "Refactored the variable names and formatting within a C++ class without affecting any of the logic or ABI? OK, binary compatibility and test compatibility verified as unchanged, that's a no-op... done in 0ms"

- "Renamed the API spec so that the 'Referer' header is renamed 'Referrer'? OK, that's going to invalidate approximately a million downstream server and client implementations, would you like to proceed?"

(examples are arbitrary and should imply no specific limitations or characteristics of languages or protocols)

Doing this effectively would require fairly tight coupling between the syntax of the language, ability to analyze dataflows relating to variables and function calls, cross-package dependency management, and perhaps other factors.

Those properties can be achieved during design of a programming language, or they can iteratively be retrofitted into existing languages (with varying levels of difficulty).

Bazel[1] attempts to achieve much of this, although to my understanding it offloads a lot of the work of determining (re)build requirements onto the developer - perhaps a necessary migration phase until more languages and environments provide formats that have self-evident out-of-date status and dependency graphs.

We'll get there and the (sometimes uneasy) jokes will be about how often the software industry used to re-run huge continuous integration pipelines.

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bazel_(software)
Hazy Blue Worlds:Holistic Aerosol Model for Uranus&Neptune, Including Dark Spots
At waipu.tv (Video streaming) we have 64% of users connected via IPv6. Compared to 2021 adoption has stalled. 2020 was 56%. waipu.tv is germany-only traffic.
Thanks for your reply. I had no idea this was a thing. I still don't have any idea why would yahoo would put us on a grey listing while Gmail and Hotmail don't.

I'm trying to get their support to help me. I'll update here if I have any useful answer from them.
Every project already migrated from GitHub when Microsoft bought them.
I mean, if it's a custom memory handler, pool allocator, etc. it's not what people generally mean by malloc, which is the call to the libc function
My he.net ipv6 tunnel adds about 2ms of latency on average, which I can totally live with.
What I've read here, in your original post and the many answers you provided, made me think that you are a very intelligent, kind and interesting woman.

Many have given you a lot of good advice, I'll try to add my thoughts.

You talk about your age and the fact that you are "running out of time" as a problem in finding the right person. I don't think it's actually a problem. You can use that to your advantage.

You are in a position in which you can - and in my opinion you should - make super clear what you are looking for. A man to have a family, very quickly.

By saying this upfront, it's absolutely true that you will scare off most men. But you do not need to find many men. You only need one. You need to find the one man out there that is willing to start a family with you. With all the pros and cons you, as a person, bring.

Having this in mind, I agree with you that you, as a woman, can be in control of the process. Just as a man would do, I would suggest you to be the "predator". Go and find the person you want and then lead the relationship toward your goal, in a trustworthy and transparent manner, of course.

The last thing I'd like to add is about expectations. You sound like an alpha woman (I say it as a very good thing). For that, I suspect you won't be able to find an alpha man though. That's not because you have something wrong. On the contrary, it's because most men are scared by women smarter or more achieving than them. And that's on them. A true alpha man will probably be looking for a much younger woman, so the chances of finding one are extremely slim.

The good news is that there are plenty of men that would love to partner with an alpha woman. The only problem is that they'll never admit it. So it is on you to take the lead. As long as they can feel as the man of the couple (in bed, or in day to day decisions, or in whatever they think makes them The men), you being more achieving won't be a problem. If you have a good salary, I bet most men would love that.

As actionable advice I'd say this: on any online platform you can think of, go and describe yourself as you did here (maybe leave out numbers, few men like women with more experience than them...). Most men are attracted to women who appear vulnerable (not a native English speaker, I hope the word is correct). The amount of replies you got here is pretty good evidence of that.

So go out and show every man you can that you are vulnerable because you want a family and you struggle to find the right one. Someone will want to be that one.

When that happens, you take the lead, and at that point accept him for whatever he is. He will probably be less smart and less attractive than you. Go past that, because it's very likely that he will be the best person for you to build a family with.

If you manage to read this, and decide to go forward with any of my suggestions, I'd love to know how things turn out for you. Good luck!
That's why they are using 15 decimal places, which in reality, is complete overkill. No instrument I am aware of is capable of measure with such accuracy, top of the line is usually at around 9 decimal places. This is a scale at which relativistic and quantum effects have to be considered.

That pi is 6 orders of magnitude more precise. The nice thing about having 6 and not just 1 or 2 (that would be sufficient) is that you don't have to worry too much about the exponential effect of compound error.

So really 15 decimal places is enough not to worry about pi not adding significant imprecision to your calculation, but not so ridiculous as to waste most of your time processing what is essentially random digits.

That it roughly corresponds to the precision of IEEE754 double precision floating-point numbers is probably no coincidence. This is maths that standard hardware can do really well. More than that requires software emulation (slow) or specialized hardware (expensive).
At AI day and in shareholder meetings they go over this regularly. Last year they described having 16 AI models for handling various situations, with the goal of eliminating all code logic and moving to a single-stack AI model capable of all situations.
In brief, it is because internet connectivity on most cellular networks goes through single gateways and devices are effectively "tunnelling" to those gateways. As long as the tunnel stays up and the mobile device is still identifiable on the RAN then the IP address assigned from the internet gateway doesn't need to change.
I'm able to search chats on my phone and PC and go to that message when I search, and get all the context around it. Even messages that are several years old. I just tested it. Maybe it's just your Teams settings?
If you search something that is also used in a popular opensource project, github codesearch will then show the same exact hit in a zillion forks, completely drowning out the interesting hits.

Is this somehow fixed in the new codesearch?
Ubiquity has several gateway products that have no hardware acceleration for IPv6.

It's not a _good_ reason, Ubiquity should've included IPv6 support from the start with the price they're asking, but it's a reason.
What happens if we work out how to make 'C' bigger?

Then the constraints still hold true, but possibility space expands.
Here the link from our Prometheus showing the data for 2020, 2021 and 2022: https://twitter.com/waipuTech/status/1543593614411964416?t=-...
Does the app work? I don’t mean the gamification: I mean, are you becoming fluent (or even just literate) in the language outside of the app?
There's a general process going on in Western culture where male-associated words are losing their gendered nature and are being used for everyone. For example, many of the male counterparts of the -tress words for women are now acceptable to use to describe women, like actor.
You mean just to say false
I had this problem with the Books app on my iPad. I had a nearly 300 day streak going of reading at least 5 minutes every day (and I have not been an avid reader throughout most of my life.) The books app would keep track of the streak at the bottom of the screen in your library view.

Then one night I started reading at 11:57 PM, and by the time I was reading for 5 minutes, it was 12:02AM and I technically missed a day. I didn’t even realize how important the streak must have been to me, because I stopped reading after that and haven’t picked up the iPad to read a book in almost 2 years since then.

Edit: to one of the flagged replies that assumed I wasn’t reading much anyway (which I can’t reply to)… to be clear I didn’t just read five minutes a night, that was the minimum amount to keep the streak going. I read (iirc) 8 books in that time frame, including the lord of the rings trilogy in there. I wasn’t reading for hours a day, but probably averaging more like 20 minutes. Not a ton, but it’s not like I was barely reading.
Tip: streak freezes cost less jewels or whatever on the web client than the mobile one.
This should be resolved, if you'd like to give it another go.
Yes, it seems that Duolingo will encourage and reward you for using the app, even though your rate of learning is not increased more by this.

It seems that the better language learning app would rather ask you to use the app less, if you make more progress when you do use the app.

The collection of recently failed flashcards that you can iterate is a great feature. It is somehow an automatic feature of spaced-repetition apps, since recently flashcards are shuffled into the stack at a higher frequency.
Oddly the hardest part of this right now is getting your hands on a raspberry pi!
I realize there are a million ways to leak addresses, but in theory is a private ipv6 space brute forceable? ie: I have every service listen on a port on some IP, they all discover each other through some specific channel (like dns). Assuming the attacker doesn't have access to that channel, they would have to start scanning every ip to try to discover services, yeah?
I have shopped for new and used cars lately and found the same thing. Used cars at or more than MSRP. A used car is almost us much as a new car so I got a new car.
Beautiful title and framing.

1) It allows room for people to jump conclusions, get emotional and generates views.

2) The scheme is never explained in the news.

These long mortgages exist in Japan and Sweden at least. Both have 100-year mortgages. It's like renting in that you pay monthly, never fully own. It's like owning that you have owners rights. Your children have a choice when inheriting to continue the deal or give it up.
> Does the app work?

Not in my experience.

Anki + language-partner sessions + evening classes did it for me.
I've seen with Wordle players recently. No one wants to break the streak but once it's broken once or twice it's almost the end of it
IPv6 has had privacy built in for years now, on every OS available. Your inbound address will remain static and possible MAC address derived, but unless you're hosting anything on it (or disabled your firewall) your network traffic will be perfectly private.

I've noticed several websites where IPv6 has lower latency than IPv4. The ease of accessing different VMs on cloud providers that will hand out a single IPv4 address, though alternatives like Betternet/Tailscale/Tor will also work around that problem.
Let me know when the beta has a casualty rate over 0. Until then, enjoy the "human privilege" of driving 10mph+ over the speed limit, cutting off traffic, weaving out of the lane, brake checking highway traffic because work was rough, and the other myriad human privileges killing 42,915 Americans in 2021 and your smarmy misquotes to justify it to yourself.
The courts of today don't follow libertarian principles which changes the outcome of my little what if.

A decent amount of libertarian ideas run into issues like this where the assumption is that current non-libertarian systems will keep them in check but this sort of mixed system isn't what a large segment of libertarians appear to want.
Meditation is being fully aware of what's happening now.

Washing dishes can be a meditation. Talking a walk. Focusing on the breath. Repeating a mantra. Lifting weights. It doesn't matter what the technique is, the important part is that you are aware of what happening now and being present in that moment, from moment to moment.

For many people, focusing on the breath is an easy way to notice when the mind wanders, so they can bring it back to the now. It's an effective technique that helps your practice meditation through trial and error (bring the mind back when it wanders and repeat), but it's not a definition of meditation. It's a practice, just like you practice for a sport, with the goal of applying it to real life.

A good example of a meditation is what professional athletes do. Almost every athlete has some kind of "routine" that allows them to clear the mind before performing their act, be it lifting a heavy weight or hitting a ball. That's a type of meditation.

Another example of the result of practicing meditation is that it helps you to create a gap between trigger and response allowing you to make a decision. For example, when someone says something that hurts you, you may be tempted to respond back with something angry and hurtful. Often this happens by default or impulse due to strong emotions. It's not a conscious rational decision made by you. Practicing meditation can allow you to be fully present in that moment. Because you've practiced, you realize what you are feeling and thinking, what your choices are, and catch yourself before you respond back with something angry. You're in a mental state where you can make a rational decision about how to respond because you are aware of your own feelings and thoughts.
That doesn't sound very selective to me, considering that the CH bonds on methane are all theoretically equivalent. Could you expand on this idea?
Headline is ridiculous. Even if the earliest embodiments start to go off copyright, Disney doesn’t have to stop using them. It just means other people can, if they can do it without treading on the later works.
During some kind of exercise, or anything that gets you into the "flow zone", is not really that different indeed.
What is typically needed is an easily reproducible reference CI environment. That is often approximated with a centralized reference CI environment, that is not necessarily easy to reproduce, in which case it is only instantiated very few times.

Left or right of VCS should not be a big question given the VCS is supposed to be decentralized, but for that to happen the whole dev process (or at least a very substantial portion of it) should be day to day decentralized at well, or at least with a (well tested) ability to decentralize when needed, without friction.

If we go back to the more general "configuration management" concept (than merely source code version control), it is obvious the ideal situation is when the whole pipelines can be freely reproduced, in which case you can usefully do it before the integration on a reference branch/repo (and redo it after just to be sure because who knows if the whole configuration has been correctly captured: you better detect discrepensies early too
- also because in some workflow you won't test exactly the same branch before merging to a reference as what is the result of the merge)
I hope the first public-domain animation we see is of Mickey Mouse swimming in a lair of gold coins like Scrooge McDuck
You're not a tester at all. You're a user who an irresponsible company has given access to incomplete software intended to control a powerful machine in close proximity to the general public.

There are no test protocols. There's no repetition to isolate the cause of a malfunction. There's no communication with the actual engineers. There's no meaningful feedback loop at all. Most importantly there's no corporate insurance, so when it goes wrong any unwitting members of the public that are impacted (sometimes literally) are stuck trying to recover their costs from some random person.

The claim that there's any kind of actual learning going on from public "testing" has yet to be supported as well. Low quality testing as noted above results in low quality data, and while enough low quality data can sometimes be useful for trends over a large group autonomous driving is something where specifics matter.

Tesla is using the "FSD beta" process primarily for marketing hype, but also to create a group of people who will be angry about having their toys taken away when regulators finally catch up.
Yeah, it's a very strong result.

On the other hand, for a say fourth degree equation, it just says that some solution expressible in terms of higher roots exists, but not how to find it. To find the expression, one needs to study the "generic" equation.
I disagree with the entire premise of the library then, because I consider a shared, global cache to introduce nothing but problems.

I like its query and request primitives, but I don't like that they are coupled to the cache.
I think you should read 10% Happier by Dan Harris. He's a news anchor that tried meditation after having a panic attack on air. He's doesn't oversell the benefits (he says he feels about 10% happier) and he covers his journey from skeptic to practicing every day
I am with you. I am well aware of being gameified yet it worked for a while for me as well. But after having been sick for a few days I lost my streak. Apple tolerates no sick days (don't take this out of context).

Also, not getting in enough stand hours because I have to put the watch on the charger during the day (the non-replaceable battery of the watch is on its way out) was another reason to stop chasing rings.

I still use the watch to track my activity and my sleep but I gave up chasing badges.
I wouldn't mind if my neighbors loudness was policed, though I'm not sure an alarm preventing talking would be any better
I personally liked the library for its query and mutation APIs, but would have preferred caching be left out or opt-in.

I ended up having to do this myself by wrapping it all up and providing an option for the caller to opt-in to the underlying global key. If the option was not passed, it would append a unique ID to the base key by default so it would become scoped to the particular mount.

IMO that should be the default behaviour.
It is good news that people can afford to pay off their cars within two years. I don't see the affordability crisis. There are plenty of cheap cars on the market and you should drive a car that is as small as possible to begin with.
Every ISP I know has their routers set to block incoming traffic by default. With most consumer router SIP ALG being defeated easily (NAT slipstreaming attacks etc) I'd argue that NAT is actually worse for security than just a simple firewall.
Either the user creates a bookmark on their home screen or the app asks with a popup if it should be added to the home screen.

How much simpler can we make this process?
such much worth is how a copyright!