skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If you made such a comment on a date, I'd get up and walk out without saying another word to you. To be quite honest, you do come across as somewhat naive / self-centered to the extent where I need to ask if you've ever been in a serious long-term relationship. That, combined with the sense that you're approaching this from an achievement point-of-view, makes me think that you're in for a rough time. Relationships are complicated and kids even more so. Being a good parent is not something that can be taken for granted, it takes a lot of time and a lot of energy.

By the way, you can't tick the "working on yourself" box by doing "therapy, support groups, meditation, dating coaching, yoga and hypnotism". These are just activities, and I'd say at least equally prone to make you a worse person as to improve you. The best way to work on yourself is to be in a healthy, dynamic relationship with someone that doesn't think you're insufferable. The compromises and attitude adjustments you'll have to make to keep the relationship going are invaluable learning (and humbling) experiences that no book or yoga teacher will ever teach you. And this is my advice to you, someone who's in his early 50s, divorced, happily remarried with kids from both marriages.

It seems to me you're trying to dive before learning to swim. I would forget kids for the next 1-3 years, and focus on finding someone to be in a deep relationship with. Even if that doesn't work out, you'll be a lot better off afterwards regarding working on yourself. That will also make you a better parent.
what if you don't have any social media accounts?
Right, in the U.K. today there’s a pretty massive difference between 99th %ile wealth and 55th %ile wealth. I don’t know what it looks like for landowners (similar I expect) but maybe in the 1860s most people were not landowners so the e.g. 20th %ile landowner owned more land than say 90% of landowners (people or e.g. farm LLCs/partnerships) do today.
The meaning of the words has become frustratingly loose in the West, but there's no point breaking my face on that wall.

You have to separate the pragmatic aspects of mindfulness meditation, which are more commonly stressed in the West, and the "less pragmatic" aspects (call that "spiritual" or "transformational" if you like) which are part of the actual practices/systems from which it originates. I'm focusing on the first as that seems to be your interest.

The core pragmatic purpose of mindfulness meditation is to notice when your mind has become distracted. Returning your attention to your breath (or whatever) after your thoughts have drifted is the practice. That's it, but if you think "that's all?" then you haven't practiced this and have no idea juuuuuuuuuuust how distracted you are.

As with "doing nothing", if you think that's easy or something "we do all the time", then you haven't really experienced or understood it. You're dealing with an intellectual preconception rather than the lived experience of recognizing your turbulence.

It can go beyond that, into disidentification from thoughts and sensations, experiencing "awareness", and so forth, but that isn't the pragmatic aspect, which comes first.
Disney has planned for this day, they have a defensive moat of trademarks around Mickey Mouse. The stylistic logos, the name, the outfit, etc.

The big publishers won’t because they all have licensing agreements with some part of Disney that is too lucrative to risk for some generic knock off mouse story.

But we will see smaller entities trying new things with anthropomorphized mice.
Jordan Peterson Suspended from Twitter
> The Congress shall have Power [...] to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.

Copyright isn't about profit, it's about promoting the progress of science and useful arts.

If you making profit induces progress on science and useful arts that's cool, but if it doesn't, society does not care.

You aren't owed a profit from the ideas you have.

Get that silly idea out of your head.
Here’s another:

https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/708173/could-the...
Shanghai police database for sale in what could be China’s biggest data breach
DocSpot | San Mateo, CA | Entry-level / junior developers, back-end and full-stack

Help people find doctors (back-end role involving text extraction and processing): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IvcTtE7yE7m5u0NfrVmvtR_i... (SF Bay Area strongly preferred, but working remotely while being able to meet up for occasional lunches in person would be fine)

Infrastructure team that provides a suite of tools (full-stack, React/Typescript): https://docs.google.com/document/d/11BhKNjnF6KmUPw2fvhqIG7y1... (onsite required)
Consciousness plausibly plays a substantial role in causality though, something that was being discussed higher in the thread.
Meanwhile, Github is completely unreachable via IPv6 to this day.

Found that out the hard way the other week when I went to order a build server without an IPv4.
Generally, all art is derivative one way or another. Many artists don't want to admit it but their work is often the product of the times and they drew inspiration from existing work. This is what underlies "Great artists steal".

People can use great art from the past to create even better art. For example, much of modern media borrows heavily from mythology to help them build intriguing fictional worlds. If creators had a stranglehold on every single idea they produced, art would have advanced at a much slower pace. Allowing derivative works would lower the barrier of creating great work, much like open source helps software solve people's problems.

Mickey Mouse's copyright expiry allows people to create characters that look like Mickey Mouse without getting sued. I'm not sure how important that itself is (given I'm no fan), but I see no reason why it should be granted an exception.
oh perfect for device tracking!!

hope you dont have any tweets that offend your goverment lol
It gave me a pause to think about how it came that I can never really tell what am I looking at anymore. Forget the HN title, which is stupid — what does this landing page tell me? Well, that it's… next gen, and it apparently can catch up with me, which is not much, since I'm not really catching up with what's going on anyway. Also, that it's "tooling". Like IDE, or framework, or maybe a chainsaw. Can't tell.

"Getting started" page tells me that "Vite" (pronounced as "veet") is "quick" in French, then it proceeds with quite wordy installation guide. It also quickly mentions that it's a "build tool". Finally. So, like gulp or grunt, I guess? But it doesn't even mention those, or any other build tools it supposedly replaces. And it seems unlikely, since everybody uses some script that comes with angular or vue or any other framework of your choice nowadays…
To be completely fair, changes occur way too often even when the name doesn't change. I tried to find a nice component library for starting out with Vue after not doing any frontend or JavaScript in years (I kind of quit when JSPM, the package manager, was hot).

It took me about an hour to figure out nothing I tried to set up worked because I had installed Vue 3 and mostly everything else was still on Vue 2.

Reminds me of Angular 2 rewriting their router every 6 weeks - to the point that they just moved on to calling it Angular 3 at release to rid themselves of the information on StackOverflow that was in a constant state of deprecation.
Just because you say it's violating copyright and licensing doesn't make it so.

If the courts don't agree then there is no penalty. It would legally be fair use. It does not matter what you or I think.

You are arguing that it is wrong, but very clearly many lawyers disagree with you.
What I'm hearing is that you're interested in a copyright term that expires at the death of the author?

While I don't think that goes far enough, I think it's an improvement over the current state. Let's do it.
Dive into Power Mac INITs and NVRAM scripts, teaching Mac OS 9 new dev tricks
Your mistake is imputing reasonableness to yourself and extremity to your interlocutor.
Truly Humbled to Be the Author of This Article
Still got a while until Song of the South is freed. We should at least carve out exemptions for works of great cultural importance that are deliberately being kept under lock and key.

I know there are some sensitive race issues, but seriously, the film won an Oscar. It's easier to see the unabashedly hateful Birth of a Nation than it is to see Song of the South!
The article seems a bit unbelievable to me but on the other hand the First World War had an absolutely massive effect on the British aristocracy so maybe it shouldn’t be totally implausible. I don’t know how you blame the lack of the season rather than other changes at the time though.
Yea... covers... sure...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVKTx9YlKls

Edit: Interview in the first 50 seconds. The song comes after that.
I will break steaks in apps on purpose, to fight the gamification. At a certain point it is not really helping and just manipulating you for the application's benefit as the article explains.

Do it because you want to, you are getting something from it, not because you have to.
I guess it got its name from the contrast to older practices. Software projects used to divide parts up considerably as part of system design and give them to individuals. Separate compilation, like in Ada, was supposed to allow compiling to interfaces without having the implementation available. After the detailed design and implementation was finished, the parts could theoretically be integrated during a period called "integration hell".

I remember the MCSD docs were promoting a "Daily build and smoke test". This was a huge difference in that they promoted at least making sure that thev whole system could be built in some state every day.

CI really appeared in the late 90s when someone had the idea that integration tests could be run for small gains in functionality. Then the software could be automatically tested on every incremental change. I credit C3/XP for popularizing the practice but I'm not a historian. Possibly someone was already at it before.
> Of course you can do it like you said but that means longer feedback loops in general. If the team wants to integrate more often and reduce feedback loops then that model evolves.

Longer feedback loops =/= long feedback loops. You can definitely wait 5 to 10 minutes if it means doing it right.

> With the important mention that for small changes/fixes that needed to get deployed quickly nobody would bother with a branch they would just push to master.

From my experience, the 1-2 lines fixes are the ones that benefit the most from automated CI because you’re doing it in a rush. In my team just last week a junior dev asked us to review their PR quickly because it was just 2 lines, and it didn’t even compile. We told them to be more careful in the future, but in the end it didn’t impact anything. It couldn’t possibly have impacted anything thanks to CI, it just makes it impossible to fuck up too recklessly.
They actually do right in the hero section of the landing page. For me:

- fast (very important)
- Fully Typed APIs (very important)

Just those two points would convince me to try it and I can see it right away on the landing page.

At my company, I looked at Vite 6+ months ago and decided it doesn't make sense for us, yet, because of some specific tooling gaps, but it's a tool that I consider "cutting edge" in the frontend tooling world. I think they're doing just fine and their page doesn't have any major issues with their copy. Do you actually do frontend dev?
Curious how Parcel stacks up to Vite.

Vite seems to have the Vue community behind it which is pretty larger.

Both have much better performance than webpack, so between the two probably doesn't matter too much.
So a dog configured your CI then.
> Duktape is a little smaller, but that's the only advantage I found.

It's not actually smaller; Duktape is about 4MB source files while QuickJS is about 2.7 MB. But Duktape has a nice C API similar to Lua. And QuickJS requires a recent C compiler whereas Duktape is happy with C89.
> What we needed was an internet protocol with the benefits of IPv6 that runs as an extension to the IPv4 stack.

My understanding is that the reason it's a new version is so existing IPv4 infrastructure would not need to be changed. This "ships in the night" approach has pros and cons, of course, but I'm personally happy to give folks who thought about this problem for many years the benefit of the doubt.

> The current approach to duplicate everything into IPv6 is wasteful and time consuming, proven by the extremely slow adoption rate.

The beauty of the IPv6 approach is that it doesn’t matter how long it takes.

I don't understand how it's "wasteful". Is it wasteful to support 3 versions of HTTP?
> I'll come in and use it.

Now you are creating too! See how this works?
Now that I think about it I have always had great trouble with reading text in my lucid dreams. Dalle is also bad at making comprehensible passages.
Yup.

Holding a copyright should be affordable for about 20 years. No person or company should still be holding the copyright for something that was made more than a world war ago.
I think the argument is about the address origin being overwritten vs forwarded to the destination.

Is about device tracking and privacy
Great guide but please please please, stop using "git checkout", which is confusing and has awful syntax that bugs out if you happen to have a file and branch with the same name. Use "git switch" and "git restore".
>will also be automatically loaded into production and other developers machines.

I’m assuming you are only submitting this as theoretical, because in the real world (where I’ve directly experienced this workflow) it’s a nightmare:

* Someone merges main which deletes working files in your feature branch. Automatic pushing/rebasing of main onto your feature branch creates needless work the moment you try to push upstream when git tries to ascertain state of local main.

* countless times I’ve hit bugs where if I try to merge “patch-a” from a common “feat-1” branch (meaning patch was cut from feat, not from main), but then main is updated by the auto-updater, I then have a messy working directory in which main’s new files are treated as unknown orphans and I have to spend time deleting these by hand.

I’m all for having my feat branch be up to date at merge time. But making it a rolling target is something git (from my perspective) hits the boundary of what git can reasonably do, and creates more pain than any type of positive DX
- Would it contribute positively to our world if competent self driving existed?

Yes, making things that people want (e.g. pay for) cheaper and better is good.

- What are the various approaches to get from here to there, and what are their relative merits and risks?

Offline deep learning. Merits: likely to work. Risks: crashes will occasionally happen.

- Assuming some approach showed promise, how should we expose it to real world conditions to allow for validation and ongoing improvement?

Gradual roll-out in initially in cities with simple conditions, then at higher volume, then in more complex conditions.

- Do the technically-savvy folks on this list think that a heuristic approach (i.e. a bunch of rules written by humans) could ever succeed at effective self driving in diverse conditions? Or is the machine learning + massive data approach more likely to solve it? Or do you consider it fundamentally unsolveable?

rules-based is not workable, ML will work.

- What interesting moral and legal questions arise if effective self-driving becomes available?

moral: none, legal: corporate liability for crashes seems pretty complex.
In general it blows my mind that people don’t understand that:

1) losing a critical mass of developers is the beginning of a death spiral

2) the critical mass is smaller than you think

3) you lose the developer months before you know you’ve lost the developer
What did he say then. He basically said and I’ll say another way so others understand

1) You spend time creating a great idea for a character or story

2) You get a limited amount of time to capitalize on it

3) I have a multimillion dollar corp where I can take the idea and spend loads of money making it popular through new works I can capitalize on

4) Sorry original creator, it’s now in the public domain very shortly after so womp womp

5) Oh and by the way I am a multibillion dollar company and did the math and I can afford those taxes in the “saner world” that the individual cannot for a longer period, so….

Also works the other way where a small corp spends tons of capital to come up with an idea or story and now they just have to give it for free before they can recoup? Talk about stifling innovation
It adds a barrier and discourages abuse. You can no longer own millions of copyrights "just in case", like many companies do right now, because maintaining every single one of them costs money each year. Obscene amounts of money if you want to maintain it for a long time. Want your copyright to be 15 years? That'll be ten million dollars per copyrighted work, please.
The data in this post seems behind. https://auctions.ipv4.global/prior-sales shows that the prices have spiked to more than $50 per IP
Tourist fluent, maybe. Enough to go to a country and get by on the patience of the natives.

I did French all through high school and most of college, then learned firsthand that I was maybe 25% as fluent as I assumed. Then I went home and went through the entirety of the Duolingo curriculum in a few months, without learning anything new (a couple new vocab words, maybe).

So, you could view this in two ways: either it's a scam that tricks you into wasting a lot of time viewing ads or paying a subscription without delivering on its promise. Or, you could see it as a shortcut that's worth at least a couple years of classes. But, at least in my experience, it does not enable you to speak a language with fluency.

(Which makes total sense if you step back and look past the marketing promises. Of course 20 minutes a day with a cartoon bird is not going to replace actually living in a country and being immersed in the language 24/7)
Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams (1999) [pdf]
It's a pleasure. Let me know if you have any more questions about TigerBeetle. Our design doc is also here: https://github.com/coilhq/tigerbeetle/blob/main/docs/DESIGN....
Would you mind sharing that international forum?
This comment describes a workflow to create Hacker News summary comments. The workflow extracts text at a specified article, builds a summary and then posts as a comment the summary text.
AI/ML just isn't at a point yet where it can encounter something it's never seen and make a decision about it in a predictable way. Which is problematic with driving for two reasons.

1) crazy things happen on the road all the time, none of which are 100% predictable, since humans have free will. Sure, the majority of driving is very predicable, but it's that tiny fraction of clown cars that's a problem.

2) humans are bad in scenarios like the above. Imagine the car has been driving by itself for 200 miles. The human will probably start reading a book or looking a their phone. And then, dang, something happens that requires human intervention. But the human wasn't paying attention. so, there's a crash!

If we can solve the problem of AI being able to think for itself, rather than drawing conclusions based on past data sets, then 100% fully autonomous driving will exist. As will a completely society changing AI!
This and the original article feel very much like solutions in search of problems. Beyond the issues with the original article, what's the point in a cryptographically secure hash from an untrusted environment? If someone were really determined to maliciously push broken code for some reason, they could just tamper with whatever generates the hash.
Of course! I wasn't trying to suggest otherwise. But these kinds of discussions are still important because if enough of us got together we could start a community initiative to develop this and either get it merged or maintain a live fork with these features.
You're right that an entire character is probably trademarkable because two similar logos are likely to be confused for each other, but I don't think that's enough. Disney may depict Mickey as a welder in some logo, but unless Disney is using that mark to identify its products in the welding industry, they ought have no right to interfere with someone else doing so.

Trademarks exist so I can't trick people into buying my product instead of your product. So if you're not offering a competing product, you ought have no right to control that use.
how is this tied to your vote? The point is that being able to mail people their vote means you've recorded the two together in a database
Causality is always hard for me to understand. Imagine an MRI, where you take a 3D object and slice it into a sequence of 2D slices. When you view the 2D slices, is it really true that slice N has any causal relationship to slice N+1? No, of course not. However, when we view a 3D slice of the universe, which is a 4D object in space-time, we want the slices to have a causal relationship.
The point is that there's no option where nobody gets to spy on me. I should have the option to host the server-side software myself, and/or delegate that to a third party of my choosing which provides a standardized API.

Calling what Apple does "privacy" is a sleight of hand. True privacy means my data is mine, I am not forced to share it with whatever random employees of a multinational corporation happen to be able to access it, it is not necessarily within the crosshairs of bulk warrants imposed on Apple by governments, and I have the option to refuse to allow it to be used to demographically and psychologically profile me for the purposes of advertising or anything else by any other entity including Apple.

What they are engaged in is the monopolization of user data, duplicitously dressed in the robes of "privacy".
>I know that righteous indignation is the new national pastime

This is your very first sentence so probably no.
As a matter of fact, you ARE allowed to copy anything I make or design, because I release all my projects under a public domain license. I despise the idea of copyright this much because of how dysfunctional and abused it is.
By the way, the questions from the research are available in this easier-to-digest tool: https://docs.google.com/document/d/19qSFKDz9AuR_nlsXQjZD-gpt...