skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You can totally just use esbuild, it is extremely well documented and easy to grok. It's very easy to embed in a go app too, but you don't have to do that or be a go programmer to use it (they put it on NPM and gave it a super basic CLI). The docs are great: https://esbuild.github.io/getting-started/

If you're just bundling JS, transforming typescript, maybe doing JSX, etc. then it's just a simple esbuild CLI command to do it. Toss it in a makefile or your CI tooling and you're done.
whats the diff between me giving it the objective "make money" and evolution giving us the objective "make copies"?
yup, same for my ISP, they just completed a rebrand and finalized a bunch of mergers so maybe they'll finally see this as a cost saving measure and implement it.
“I like to pay taxes. With them, I buy civilization.”

Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.
I don't know if they have changed this in the few years since I let my Duolingo streak lapse, but they actually have decent explanatory text for each lesson, it's just not (or wasn't) accessible from the mobile app; you had to use the desktop website to see it.
I was going to say this – though I've only read it once, I'll certainly read it again. Loved how much it immersed you in the world.

Recently I enjoyed Cloud Cuckoo Land by Anthony Doerr for similar reasons, if you're looking for recommendations!
Morally I don't see why "Disney", the legal entity, should have any right to prevent anyone from creating derivative works today. Disney , the creative artist, has been fully compensated for his contribution, is long dead, but held hostage like some copyright mummy by this abominable company. Nobody can argue he would have lacked the motivation to create these characters if he'd known his copyright would expire already in the 70s.

It's ridiculous to argue copyright incentivizes innovation when Disney/Marvel/etc are comically uncreative, despite their vast resources. Sequel upon sequel...
HTTP is backwards compatible
Infinite Jest - David Foster Wallace:
It includes so many sides of life: terrible misery and humor, both spicy and tender, sometimes simple, sometimes absurd, then politics, society, love, cynicism, - and poetry. And it predicted, by the way, shockingly many developments of today's (American) society. And the language, of course, is opulent and wild, it won't get boring any time soon.
Wouldn't "Mickey Mouse branded products" rather relate to the value of the trademark?
> SpaceX'es focus is to scale up

> Removing any unnecessary feature is a must in order to reduce risk.

You can’t scale a space based planetary ISP without IPv6, this isn’t a feature, it’s a requirement.
Supreme Court End of Term Statistics
Surface level answer: because electromagnetism.

It happens that for 2 currents flowing in one direction it’s energy-wise more stable to be closer to each other - and wise versa.

Deep level answer: nobody knows why exactly is that.

Because electromagnetism is just a model to describe what we see with some math approximation.

Maybe it’s just we were lucky to be born in the universe with such properties and able to talk about it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction
The 10,000,000 number was scheduled passenger flights only (there are another 4,500,000 FAA-serviced flights), but it's possible that the 150 emergencies included non-airliner passenger flights (like semiprivate charters). I don't know.
i think you know very little about the music tech space then.
true love is the goal that you want to develop with your current partner. you do it by caring about them and their interests, and getting them to care about yours.

the point is: don't just pretend to be interested. but try to honestly care. if you honestly love this person, you should be able to. pretending may help to get you started, but if you have to keep pretending, you may end up unhappy. better find something else to love about your partner.
This has been a year of re-reading for me, so this is a timely question. I can't pick just one at the moment, but I'll split a couple of top choices via genre. (Also worth noting that in the end, my final choice would probably be the Bible.)

Fiction:
The Heart Is a Lonely Hunter - Carson McCullers

Angle of Repose - Wallace Stegner

Non-fiction:
In Good Company - Stanley Hauerwas

Into the Silent Land - Martin Laird
"Fork-and-pull isn't the final form of development workflows."

Actually, like the wheel, I think it is the final form. When artificially sentient machines are writing code for us and someone or some thing pollutes or corrupts a critical model; a human will need so step in and fork where things were working to fix it.
That's certainly what you are saying. And yet, it did happen:

https://www.history.com/topics/world-war-i/armenian-genocide

https://www.britannica.com/event/Armenian-Genocide

https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/the-armeni...

https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/what-was-the-armenian-ge...

https://allthatsinteresting.com/armenian-genocide-photos
Sure but if you can put one conduit in you can put two in. And is there any code against running fiber in the same conduit?
And here we are again, like it's one the movies of Groundhog Day or Edge of Tomorrow, where somebody keeps hard pushing Cadey/Xe/Christine (and whatever other connected names) old blog posts to promote the website at V's expense.

V is an open source programming language. Of course the V developers and contributors are going to have continual discussions among themselves and then make changes to their goals, roadmaps, features, and timelines. To include make mistakes and have to do corrections. This should be common sense and understood, but apparently not, or least not when it comes to discussions involving the V language.

It's insanity to continually run through the wayback machine on any alpha version of a programming language's website and run around: "Why is there a change in this language feature?" or "But, you said the language would do this before." or "Why you changed the date?". What is more relevant is the present website and present version of the programming language, because things continually change and that's how development works.

In regards to your conspiratorial claims, lets check the previous posts:

1) Mst made a claim that somebody named Cadey was mistreated by the V community.

This looks to be false. Doubtful if anybody in the V community even knows who Cadey is. Furthermore, the "V community" is not in control of random blogs, websites, or posts on the internet or their content. If you are going to refer to the "V community" it needs to be at least somewhere officially recognized by them (like V's GitHub) or at least where one can prove they significantly congregate at.

2) The V creator didn't know who in the world Mst was talking about and asked for a link as proof.

3) This was then used as an opportunity by an odd account from 2010 (Neven) with only a few posts (really odd) to then re-push and promote upon us again the Cadey/Xe/Christine website.

Which drudges up 3 year old mostly non relevant crude, that nobody really cares about except V detractors that seem to get off on it, that is pushed on every HN thread involving V that I've seen.

Note- And it's such a repeating pattern, of what V detractors do (even without mentioning the downvoting, flagging, trolling, and gaslighting), that others are noticing it too. Among them, sph and johnfn, and check out their posts above.
Yes and No.

Yes, it has the same ability like webpack, which allow you to plug the logic you need into the system and change the results to fit your requirement.

No, the config file or the plugins isn't compatible, because it is based on rollup. So you need to find rollup plugins instead.
And even then the compulsory licensing only covers relatively "straight" cover versions – you can change the arrangement and the general style of the song, but you need to keep the basic melody and the lyrics more or less intact.

Now Dylan also did a number of those relatively straight cover versions as well, but there are also quite a few instances where he more liberally took (occasionally self-admittedly "stole", see the sibling post by mikojan) parts of a melody (or sometimes even the whole melody) and re-worked it with new lyrics, or incorporated text fragments from other works into his lyrics, etc. etc.
> … all control structures in Smalltalk are implemented by…

"… compiler optimises ifTrue:ifFalse: and friends using special opcodes, so as to avoid having to create closures…"

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32662354/optimising-iftr...
We looked into it. At current TPU/GPU prices it's about $.60 to $.30 an image.
I have no idea about your odds of winning or whether it is worth the hassle… BUT, I doubt that suing will make much difference in your career. A lot of hiring managers won’t google you. Those that do may not care. I’m not saying NO ONE will care but my hunch is that most won’t.
I am feeling like this era of frontend javascript is too much focused on tooling and frameworks that developers spend most of their time dealing with complexities associated with them rather than focusing on creating something meaningful and useful.
Yes, but it is not unreasonable speculation. Speculation is not without value.

> but that doesn't make this or that probable.

Of course, that's a given.
I don't see how I made your point. There is a big difference between freedom to express and freedom from compulsion. He hasn't claimed that others don't have freedom to express - he has claimed that their expectations of him don't entitle them to his labor.

Another right from that same document states, "No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms."
Being able to say you’ve read this book pays dividends that go far beyond just the experience of reading the contents. It will give you instant credibility among important and highly intellectual individuals, and could lead to great job offers or securing strong investments. The prestige and recognition you carry amongst peers is priceless. Even just owning the book without reading it already puts you a step ahead of other people. The right people can be blown away just seeing it on your shelf. Read the book, yearly.
The Brothers Karamazov (Dostoevsky)

It's a book that raises a lot of good questions about good vs. evil, free will, morality, religion and so much more.
I agree with your sentiment. It's magic until it isn't. When something breaks, you need to often need to dig into the implementation and understand how everything works. This becomes harder and harder when there are more and more layers of code and libraries, many written by completely different people. Seems like frontend is still going in this direction of "magic > simple". I wonder when we'll reach some point where we see a dramatic shift.
A computer assisted proof for 100k years stability of the solar system
> Either as an end to end experience or simply fewer bugs?

I'd say we build bigger things with the same size/bug ratio. Therefore, "Small is beautiful".
https://magenta.tensorflow.org
Yeah. But web developers need to understand, broadly speaking there are 2 very distinct use cases. They NEED to scope whether they are making a webapp which could even be comparable to a native app, or a webpage which is just dealing with some async requests.

That's not the tools' fault.
Yes of course, maybe, but we can't say that this is particularly probable and that disbelieving it is laughable, as OP claimed.
I'm guessing you are American and under 35 because there's a whole generation of you that considers an 13-year tech bull run with massive stock appreciation as normal, and the hardest problem is passing leetcode interviews. It's a very different story looking for a job in a real downturn like 2000 or 2008.
It's possible. I often use vite with multiple build targets (decoupled but with code sharing) .. this can be specified in the rollup config options but my specific build process uses two separate vite configs to resolve some chunking challenges. Everything is parallelised for dev/build in an npm script. From memory there's a bunch of conversations relating to this kind of setup in the GitHub issues.

Edit: vite allows you to specify (e.g. node specific) exclusions/globals in the config, it also allows you to specify a 'library' build if that's what you're interested in .. with named exports, etc.
The Mind of a Benevolent Dictator
wp5 would've been peeking the BIOS keybuffer to see if it needed to read multiple chars. they had some "display driver" layer by then too, iirc; it was an issue for older systems.
I have the feeling there is a „we need to do x pre-commit“ season right now, opinions like „The end of CI“ seem to just pop up.

I‘m not convinced by pre-commit arguments. C in CI isn’t only for „continuous“, it also happens to introduce „centralised“ and „certain“ (as in, it’s going to run whether you like it or not).

Coupled with good git style there really is absolutely nothing that needs to change for teams of 1 and bigger.

Just my 2€
EU governments take decision to end sale of polluting cars
It's funny how the Mythical Man-Month is nearly 50 years old and yet its lessons go unlearned so often.
When I was a kid, there was a local used car dealership owned by a man named Tom Mouse. He used a Mickey Mouse image on the sign for his business. IIRC, he eventually got hit with a copyright violation for it, because this was 30 years ago. But next year, it might fly, because Disney doesn't sell cars.

It's hard to imagine how one could make animations using the likeness and name of Mickey Mouse and not have it interpreted as "representing a similar business". Hence my comment.
Delta experimenting with personalized flight information boards
> CGNAT itself is a enormous risk.

How?

IPv6 isn't a substitution for CGNAT, it's an addition to it. You either have to keep CGNAT or replace it with dedicated IPv4 for each customer. Dedicated IPv4 is most likely too costly given the limited availability. SpaceX is also trying to cut cost aggressively.
Faulkner: The Sound and the Fury
For what it's worth, Apple offers Numbers free on the App Store. I'm not sure how deep the financial functions go.

Graphing: The classic has been ported by its original author. Not free but a pleasant surprise https://swift.org/blog/graphing-calculator/
> reap what you sow.

That seems unfair though, and highlights really the key issue. That idiom is about accepting the eventual outcomes of your own actions. But most people who hold equity are impacted by the the choices of a small minority of powerful players. The board and some C-level execs are the only people in a position to choose whether to pursue this path or influence how it is managed or administered. If those parties unloaded their shares in those early days while intentionally preventing the pool of current/former employees from selling theirs, that seems shady.
From Elon Musk in numerous interviews. Latest of which is with Tim Dodd.
It’s a pretty niche area of law from what I can tell. Most lawyers familiar with SPACs just set them up (already a relatively small area). Most securities lawyers familiar with similar suits don’t have SPAC experience. I’d welcome any leads on lawyers.

The independent lawyers I’ve talked to say something like “sounds like you could sue, but I’m not familiar with that area of law.”
Musashi by Eiji Yoshikawa. Great for entertainment as well as enlightenment.
> more indication that an almighty creator exists

Has that ever not been the case? God has been the goto explanation of anything modern humans didn't understand.

The most brilliant minds at various points couldn't have thought "aye, if we cut a tiny thing inside a metal heavier than lead or glue these tiny things inside air it can create more energy than lighting/gunpowder/dynamite".

Or that wireless communication is possible and sending a manmade moon out around the Earth is also possible, and you can do both for instantly sending light signals, nay, whole books around the globe.

Or virtual worlds that are not bound by any physics (maybe we're dumped into one at birth which can make any observations rather pointless heh).

I can't imagine FTL (although far out theories exist), but our current method of choice is chemical explosions, so there's some massive improvements to be made there.
Seems like they already have.
Not who you responded to, but trust me, I would if I could still use Vue professionally to where I could justify the time in my work and/or personal projects.

I was a huge fan of Vue 2 and Nuxt, but the work world has been heavily favoring React for a while now.

Not that everything has to be about work, but just haven’t mastered React enough to personally justify the time spent on working with Vue 3.
So I guess the answer is it depends what are the tax revenue is being spent on - are they being spent on building or mantaining civilization or on other things (like enriching friends lobbyists and funders, mantaining a particular political party's power etc.). I think the answer in all major nations is that it's being spent on a mixture of both. That taxation is sometimes theft and and other times not.

I think this article becomes a simplistic propoganda piece because it asks a simplistic question and does a simplistic analysis. And it thereby misses and obscures the deeper debate going on.
The argument presented was neither level-headed nor genuine.
Plato: Complete Works

Are anthologies cheating?
I am also not a biologist, but I apparently think I know some of this? Hopefully if I'm wrong enough, a real biologist can correct me. :)

I think we're still very far from arbitrary genetic editing and whole genome design and synthesis. I don't know how much of this is "technically feasible but way too expensive" vs "we have promising research directions on some of the challenges, but definitely don't know how to do this effectively at all", but it all adds up to that not being an option today.

The best we actually have available today is embryo selection. We don't know exactly what phenotype each embryo will express, but we've got enough statistical clues that we can make fairly good guesses most of the time. So, you make 100 embryos, sequence their DNA, then choose whichever embryo is given the best score by your statistical analysis, and use that one.

Embryo selection is far from perfect, but it lets you avoid any genetic conditions that we know how to detect, and it lets you get an embryo with more of the preferred variants of genes statistically correlated with whatever you want to select on, and it's absurdly cheaper and more efficient than alternatives like "Let each embryo grow for 30 years, then evaluate the results of the genome".

With iterated embryo selection, the idea is that instead of one large batch of 100, you do a small batch of 10, choose the best from that group, and use that as source material to make another batch of 10. This acts as a ratchet, letting you get more selection with fewer embryos.

So, the point of finding an input to a function on a computer that gets a good score is that it's the cheapest, most efficient way we know of so far to get a human embryo whose genome scores highly on this function. There are also some other nice properties, like having the embryo be highly correlated with the genomes of the parents, which a lot of people like, and is something you can explicitly add to the scoring if you want.

Just like any selection/optimization procedure, you can get some pretty bad outcomes when you go to extremes, as for a lot of traits, your function on the computer is only a statistical model of observed correlations, not a real comprehensive model of what the genome means and does. I imagine you're probably going to get something with severe issues if you tried to grow the embryo you get from 10,000 rounds of IES.

Embryo selection is trying to use what we think we know to choose the best embryo, given only the genetics. We don't have perfect knowledge, but we do have some knowledge, and we can make some bounded use of it.
I wonder why the forbidden word list is secret. Surely not just for spammer combat.
James Clavell's Shogun: The contrast between the Japanese and European cultures in 1600 are delicious, the characters and plot both well developed. I've read it at least a dozen times over four decades. As I age, I find I experience it very differently.
What was his theorized motivation for Russian invasion, geopolitical or otherwise? Was it tied to Nato moving in, as others have advocated, or something different?
> it's very much one book that happens to be like 4000 pages long rather than four separate books.

It's a good way to approach it. Because otherwise part two and so on feel "more of the same", and you may be a bit let down (like me) hoping there would be "new schtick" in the new books

> The fandom is teensy tiny

Count me squarely in that fandom.
Isn't location history tied to other, very basic features to compel people to use it?

And I just accepted a software update on my Pixel phone a couple of days ago and found that it had reset my default apps for browsing and music playing -- what are the odds that Google will surreptitiously do the same to my location tracking consent?
There are ways to optimize an attack but pure brute force like IPv4 is impossible.
I know what you mean but I actually thought it was quite a cool way to start out and as someone else has said, it is replaced later.
Methane is already a viable rocket fuel. I don’t think it would make sense to convert to methanol first.
And check how much of Europe did Hitler rule at his peak and how much when he had lost it all.
I also feel like this is the actual use case of Vite. Don't want anything else but be able to roll a static site together, while using some vanilla html, css and js with a few assets attached.
The negativity about the annoying landing page is fair enough, but vite is actually awesome to work with as a dev! I've been using it as a dev server for sveltekit, its performance claims are very true.
Ukraine war: Russia claims capture of eastern city Lysychansk
> she was much less likely to become the kind of terrifying matriarch so familiar to readers of PG Wodehouse

My favorite line.
I use this a fair bit in daily work but really it's an absolute gold mine when learning a new language or framework etc.

Currently learning Rust and I use it multiple times a day to learn patterns of usage for different libraries and language features. Documentation examples may not be that great and with code search you can find actual use cases.

Absolute game changer for me.
A rare orchid thought to be extinct in Vermont was rediscovered after 120 years
Yes I think this is the crux:

> Trust in the developer is required ... but it is likely the case that developers are incentivized to illustrate that they are reliable, careful and trustworthy -- and that should strongly encourage accurate test result signing

100% guaranteed you're going to see "oh I just made a stupid typo that broke one test but I can see what is wrong so I'll just fix it and use the previous test results".

Also since it's entirely based on trust anyway I'm not sure what additional benefit signing gets you. I don't think there's really a way to prove you ran the tests.

Either way, all my other points still stand. CI isn't going anywhere.
I haven't recently, but last time I did I wasn't able to find anything telling
You might also enjoy The Three Musketeers by Alexandre Dumas.
> because maintaining state for GCNAT tables is far more complex then just forwarding packets.

But it’s a solved problem with mature solutions, decades old. Is it really financially expensive?
The Ehagaki (Postcard) Museum in Kobe, Japan
Was this a cost just for the DALL-E piece or the full text extraction, summarization and image generation workflow?
That's also what I'm using (WeatherPro). But sadly it's on the decline and seems to have been abandoned since the data supplier was acquired by another company. I only heard rumours though.