skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Interesting ! You know, I actually did meet my last boyfriend after 20 dates in SF so there might be something to this!

By the way. Attached, which I forgot to mention is one of my favorite books on dating. I think I’m more of an anxious type but the book gave me space to accept and forgive myself for that, and I met my boyfriend after that !

It didn’t work out because he didn’t want to have kids with me but we shared a lot of love and I have no regrets.

Thanks very much for weighing in.
Yes. When you write the same algorithm, even with a different style, it's a direct derivation of the code at hand. Derivative works of GPL licensed code are still GPL licensed.

Moreover, Copilot doesn't always derive code, but provides the code as-is, reproducing it comment by comment [0], and with a wrong license while at that.

[0]: https://twitter.com/mitsuhiko/status/1410886329924194309
People were arrested and imprisoned for distributing leaflets opposing the draft. The First Amendment didn't help them much, despite remaining completely unchanged for the past 250 years.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schenck_v._United_States

Who's to say that the current SCOTUS won't choose to interpret it in that way again?
I was on an oversold WestJet flight a few days ago and a $2400 voucher was announced to give up your seat. I was told the amount corresponded to the delay, and that it was "up to" $2400, with a flight leaving the same time the next day, which was the longest option mentioned being worth $1500. I didn't see any confirmation from someone receiving the $10,000 so I would guess it was the same situation.
Side topic, I think the question "give me an example of when you resolved a difficult challenge at work" and the like is the most bullshit part of job interviews.

Only for boring jobs.

For interesting jobs, such questions offer the interviewer a chance to assess the candidate's sense of perspective (low level, architectural, maintenance, operations, security, efficiency, management bottom line, etc.), reason (often mutually conflicting cross-domain priorities), articulation, honesty/openness, reflectiveness (re. benefit-of-hindsight), and so forth.

And as such, this type of open question allowing one to draw from past challenges should be a gem for a good candidate in the right context.

Source: Used it this week.
This is a great example of a thorough market survey. Every startup should do this kind of analysis. Thanks for posting.
I wonder if your personal situation is an example of the changes we’ve seen with the increasingly central role online dating has on individuals matching with potential partners.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8600582/

The article details how men match far less frequently than women, with most matches by women for males enjoyed by only a small population of highly desired males.

Highly desired males have a far greater selection of females to choose from than average males, and would be far more likely to enjoy the benefits without the relationship commitment.

Your being ghosted immediately following matching or their failed efforts at immediate physical intimacy may be an indicator that you are only pursuing highly desired males.

If so, then maybe you are caught in loop where your initial choices in highly desirable males have a ‘cereal aisle syndrome’ or Netflix scrolling problem in selecting you.

To be blunt, maybe visually you are an 8 striving to match with a 10?

Getting beyond just the visual and to the substantial requires in person meeting for most males to void being filtered out.

I can’t really offer any advice other than keep your ‘attack surface area’ high to increase opportunities for serendipity!

Don’t underestimate serendipity.

And just surf the waves life sends your way.

Good luck and I hope you are happy and full of purpose regardless of relationship and kid status.
I wonder why the tips mentioned in your talk are not applied to the article. As you said, engineers looking to improve their writing skills don't want to read a novel.
Can anyone recommend a good IPv6 book?
Who shares Microsoft’s “values”, and what are they?
- Code review aka pull requests.

- Issues.

- CI.

- "Home page" with the readme.md rendered.

Easy discoverability is a large concern. Easy discussion with fast round-trips and a trail is important (email or NNTP can help here though). CI is a thing that may need a serious effort to get running smoothly.

These things are centralized because it's easy to implement them once in one place instead of reinventing. But if there'd be an obvious and bullet-proof way to have them replicated (like in Fossil), the need for strict centralization would wane.

Discoverability would still be an issue though. It's like torrents: completely decentralied, but without a directory like TPB it's really hard to find them.
Apple wanted to force Cocoa on everyone but had to delay their OS an entire year to build Carbon so that developers would actually port their Mac apps to OS X.
> If there truly were no way to do a shift, then, sure, I'd accept the loop

Not even then. You can just use an addition instead of a shift.
The reassingment of ipv6 networks is annoying. My provider gives me an new 64 network on each reconnection, so i have to use the equivalent of the private adresses in my homenetwork.
It seems likely that police have divested from minority communities, which I agree is a genuinely racist outcome.

There are complications, though. In the 90s, leadership figures in minority communities rightly called out under policing as a serious issue that hurt their communities and needed addressing. Nowadays enforcement actions, although increasing overall quality of life and decreasing violence and premature death, are highly politically sensitive, and police in those communities can expect lots of push back and legal actions without the support of political leadership.

It's simple enough to say "well police officers should enforce perfectly," and that would of course be ideal. But in a world where perfect solutions are the enemy of the good, what's the best course of action? There are always tradeoffs, and activists need to recognize them.
Cryptocurrencies are a way to get funding for web3 infrastructure in a decentralized way. Sadly, it's not the only way cryptocurrencies can be used.

I think, IPFS and Radicle did good here by not making these type of payments mandatory.

They said: if you don't want to run all that stuff yourself, pay someone to host your node. If you want that someone to host nodes in a decentralized matter, you can pay them with crypto.
How many men have you rejected and how many men rejected you?
If I had to guess the first number is higher than the last.
Maybe lower your standards?
Be careful mtklein- I may steal your karma ! I really do need some good karma :) I promise I’ll ask politely, I won’t steal though.
> The findings show the tool industry is mature and highly consolidated. Two companies: Stanley Black & Decker Inc. and Robert Bosch GmbH sit at the top of the tool industry controlling 26% of the global market.

The top 2 firms have 26% of the market. Highly consolidated. That's nothing, check out PC operating systems.
Although I don't agree with you I up-voted the comment because I think you're raising an important point.

Automating code generation is part of the self-accelerating process of the techno-singularity, eh?
Don't your ISP offer static addresses as an option?
It's just like driving the car. Difficult to focus at the begging but once you practice for some months it feels quite natural. The next level is driving the interview to expose deception and that's a nightmare since you need a super high level of self control.
Gas turbines can be rapidly activated and deactivated, they are not the cause of excess production.

Again, what is this "ordinary dirt-cheap storage" technology? Sure, you say it's not going to be built until there's an even bigger energy surplus. But at least just specify what technology is going to provide this dirt cheap storage. Because I'd really want to know. All of the alternatives I know of like compressed air, hydrogen storage, ammonia storage, all have significant drawbacks impeding cost effective deployments.
Not only this, but don’t assume your reader even knows they’re on the right page. Everyone has a different way of breaking down problems, and can click on the wrong link. They need to quickly know whether to hit the back button, before they’ve dumped all short term memory.

Tell them why they are here, so they know if they disagree.
> if you took the 10k, you're a chump who probably passed up a seven sfigure settlement

Seems like a reach.

Has anyone to date received a 7-figure settlement for getting involuntarily bumped (except for maybe that dude the airline really roughed up)? And remember the person taking $10k had what maybe a 1 in 100 chance of being randomly selected for an involuntary bump?
I also ran into this with Comcast ipv6. It seemed to get better over the last couple years so maybe they change your PD less frequently now.

One solution I was considering, but never implemented, was to use a ULA addres range internally and doing 1:1 NAT mapping on the external delegation to the internal ULA range
This doesn't really explain why energy is needed in a blockchain. Every block contains a verifiable proof that energy has been used to mine the block. Given the properties of the algorithm and physical reality, it is also a verifiable proof that certain amount of time has passed. This proof is what enables all participants to verify that the longest chain is the correct one.

Proof-of-work isn't used just to add cost, but to make sure that the longest chain has longest history in physical time, and make it objectively verifiable.

Proof-of-stake doesn't have this property. Whole history can be recreated in a microsecond, and there's no way to tell by looking at the blockchain. Instead, network participants have to ask others for the correct chain, or refer to a trusted source when there are disputes.
> THE SUCCESSFUL relationships I’ve had have unfailing started with a tone of calm, comfort, and unexpectedly cosy familiarity.

I think you're just describing the same thing, experienced differently, because we are different people.

My main point is that it's not uncommon at all to know, on some level, that what you have with a given person is very different from what you've had with others well before you're sure it's serious.

> However in my experience that/those incredibly intense first experiences have NEVER failed to be anything but (at best) the crushing disappointment of baseless assumptions meeting reality, and at worst the beginning of a “situation” with someone with highly questionable goals, morals and expectations

I'm sorry this has been your experience. And it's true, I am telling a cute version of the story that didn't include all the hard hard work of having an actual functioning relationship. Suffice it to say that there has been a huge amount of that, as well. Something being intense does not make it easy or healthy, you're right. But I also don't think OP is wrong to hope for something like that, or that it can't happen, and I think that it happening does not necessarily mean you'll end up in a "situation".
He "typically" saved 70%, and overall >80% (152000 lines down to 29000).
Yes, actually. That's why clean-room design is a thing.
Note that the controlling framework here is copyright law, hence the term "copyright license".

A lawyer will tell you that reimplementing code you have read, even if you change around the functions and rename the variables, is inviting a lawsuit. A general defense to a copyright lawsuit is to document that you have never viewed the copyrighted work, e.g. by having one person/team document the function of the code and having another person/team implement the function using that documentation (a.k.a. "clean-room reverse-engineering").

In this case, it would be up to the courts, but having a piece of copyrighted code reproduced verbatim in your project without a license is not a good look, and I highly doubt usage of Copilot would be an affirmative defense.
US vs. German Wire Cutter Pliers: Knipex, Snap On, Irwin, Klein, Wiha (2021)
If most of Paypal/Visa's employees commute into the office? I imagine the energy consumption is quite a bit higher.

If they work from home? How would you even measure this energy? They have to power their home and feed themselves so that they can do their job to keep the system running. Is that taken into account?
If you don't pay, someone else will. GitHub is funded by private investors demanding a return, which incentivizes behavior like repurposing your code to facilitate mass license infringement. SourceHut is entirely funded by its users and is therefore only accountable to their needs.

SourceHut's fees are very cheap ($2/mo) and users who cannot pay for any reason are offered free service.

If you will only use services that you don't need to pay for, that's your choice, but you should respect the choices of others who consider these incentives and their outcomes more important.
From the article:

> “If you have Apple Pay, you’ll even have the money right now,” the flight attendant said, Aten wrote.
I’m not sure I follow your logic. Climate change is happening and rich players of capitalism are making record profits while being significant contributors of greenhouse gas emissions.

The logic of whom not to trust in this chain is pretty simple. There is no catch-22 here without some magical stretch of logic.
C and C++ are some of the few languages where the spec goes out of its way to not depend on an allocator, for good reason, and this is well after you've accounted for the majority of the code that, hopefully, doesn't need to do memory allocation at all. The fact that many programmers don't care is an indication that most code in most C or C++ software is not written with performance in mind. And that's (sometimes) fine. LLVM has a good ecosystem reason to use C++, for example, and it's well known in the compiler space that LLVM is not fast. Less recently, for a long time C and C++ were considered high level languages, meaning lots of software was written in it without consideration of performance. But criticizing the default implementation's performance absent a discussion of its priorities when you have all the power to not be bottlenecked in it anyway is just silly.
Wow, that's a truly horrible tech stack. Flutter, not even once.
Seriously ridiculous questions. I know many of my Gen-X peers started families in their 40’s without assistance.
Oh you popped on the Discord yesterday. Sorry about that, Discord is a poor replacement for the old anon chat rooms, lol.

Thanks for the feedback. I might just pivot straight into that. I was dragging my feet on it because I didn't get much people interested in that, but only because my only communication medium is the survey.
You obviously don't understand game theory. You could only receive a "settlement" (and good luck even getting 6 figures), possibly, if you were involuntary bumped. Which is why airlines offer money -- so the removal is not involuntary. The people who got off got $10,000, the people who stayed on the flight and got nothing are the chumps.
On the B2B and B2G side economic patriotism is strong in Germany and France, but it seems that as a result local companies don't have to try as hard. Why bother if they will choose you based on nationality, not necessarily merit?

Remember OVH server room fire? Was there any failure of such magnitude in AWS/Azure/GCP?
> people protecting fiefdoms than delivering the best product.

Apparently you have never worked at any company with more than 50 employees because that's literally how every large company works. Career-obsessed managers who can't see the forest for the trees not giving a single shit about the overall product as long as their goals were met. They're off to the next promotion before all hell breaks loose.
Redux is weird because it's only necessary at a certain scale, but it's the same scale where having a global shared object makes things really confusing. For example, suppose you're trying to deprecate a reducer; you need to find all consumers of the state it manages. But you can't, because there's no actual dependency between a reader of the store and the reducers. You're stuck wading through all the useSelector or connect() calls in the entire app; hopefully the reducer was managing a state branch with an easily-greppable name.
The UN Declaration of Universal Human Rights, signed by the vast majority of nations says "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers." So I think he is in fact entitled to say how all of open source ought to work.
> Why support Github when there is st.ht?

Github is about 1000x more user friendly?
Ruined? I wish my life were only ruined like his.

"Cures the heart break of psoriasis!"

Tom Waits in sotto voice "Buddy, you don't know the meaning of heartbreak."

Tom Waits- Step Right Up
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2_snSkpULQ
That $6 billion presumes that the all cancer research is being funded by NIH grants, though. I imagine there is plenty of research being done in major pharmaceutical labs like Pfizer, J&J, Merck, etc.
It’s so the system can update the runtime when security vulnerabilities and such are discovered.
That does not clarify whether it's $10,000, or up to $10,000.
Are you kidding me? Smaller companies will use you to make mistakes and learn. And when they can't support something because of resources then you bear the consequences. Nice notion but not a rule of thumb in my opinion. Mega corps like google are terrible as well. Newish companies that have been in the industry a few years are the rule of thumb unless you can afford to be their guineapig/stepping-stone.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, none of which has been supplied. This particular statement about Apple Pay makes the story sound less likely, since it is not the typical way airlines handle this compensation.
git-remote-gcrypt + rclone + s3.
A number of Apple's original core apps (like iTunes, AppleWorks, etc.) were Carbonized apps.
https://metebalci.com/blog/hello-ipv6/
Most apps actually do use localStorage as a persist layer. But it's not a replacement for state libraries because it's just a place to store strings, and that's it. A state management library is so much more than a scratchpad.
That's why the revival of NetNewsWire is a great thing. They don't offer enough settings, but outside of that they're at parity with all the paying services and they're free and open-source.
And then the Supreme Court will overturn those laws as Congressional overreach.

Actually, I doubt Congress will ever pass such laws. Passing laws requires an extraordinary coincidence. One side has to control the House and a supermajority of the Senate and the Presidency. Any of them can say "no". The system is designed to favor the status quo, and there is no realistic check or balance on the Supreme Court.
Perhaps the licenses just need to be amended to explicitly say “you may not train AI models with this source code” and then get ready for a court battle.

I think Microsoft gives back to open source almost as much as they take, so I’m fine with them.
It's an amusing term for sure and definitely an outcropping of the internals at FAANG (or maybe MS as well) culture. Like, it almost sounds denigrating. "I was just an individual contributor"; like, the people who do the real work, y'know, they're out there doing the difficult work of herding cats to tell them which protobufs to move from A to B, while the ICs are, y'know just ICing doing the actual protobuf shuffling :-)

It's just about promo culture @ Google, etc. and not in fact I think a reasonable principle of how good software gets built.
> I think what you might be asking for is if there is a federated code repository that supports git. That’s an interesting question, and I don’t know if such a thing yet exists.

Sourcehut itself is fully federated if you are willing to learn email workflow. You don't need to register an account anywhere to collaborate on sourcehut. That include feature requests, bug reports, discussions, submitting patches and even pull requests from any public repository anywhere [1]. The discussions also exist on mailing list archives and personal mailboxes. They are not lost even if you decide to change host.

But developers are extremely resistant to email workflows. When I suggest it, people react as if I am suggesting black magic. But in my experience, email workflow isn't that unpleasant. Most of the problems with email workflow are due to poor email clients (issues with plain text, composing, rendering and threaded displays). Setting up git and a good but simple email client for git is not a hard task. The rest of the workflow is actually very pleasant.

[1] https://git-scm.com/docs/git-request-pull
You probably know it, but a friendly reminder: undo is just a callback doing a backwards operation, in an array named “undo stack”.
Smaller companies are a much bigger risk as a dependency. Whatever GitHub may do in the future, they are unlikely to disappear in any time frame I care about.
Ok, here are some results:

1: "not in italy": https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmWPbZnZL7mHazzMmGxx6wQjcbC2DdKtgpiYYUY...

2: "looking approvingly": https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmNgD9niZy1n4KWSXS3HEFeZm2qxQ2SzESfA6z7...

3: "everyone is unhappy": https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmcTktpFQGeGDAp7e3MwEPwwFMVMbDaEgW6PuSA...

I think getting good Dall-E results wil end up being an "art" in its own. Dall-E is like a broad brush and honestly I've never been good at getting great results. I think figuring out how to push Dall-E in a way that aligns with what you want with the right descriptors really goes a long way.

I think to get there, we need a good dictionary or wall of examples that tell you what you can even do. I didn't even know you could have it create clay dioramas.
I always check with a trusted friend to make sure I have a good reason for not going on a second date.

It is NEVER because I didn’t feel a “spark”

Reasons would include rudeness, meanness, treating service workers with disrespect, speaking for an hour without asking me a question, and occasionally completely not physically attractive to me for a very specific reason. Women tend to get criticized a lot for the last one, but oddly, no one tells men to try again with women they find physically unattractive…and even here I push myself past my limits.

Given that - it’s 90% I turn down, 10% don’t ask me out again - I usually assume if a guy doesn’t it means hes not interested. But perhaps I’m too attached to traditional gender roles
The bureaucracy is expanding to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy.

— Oscar Wilde
There are direct replacements and refrigerants that require different equipment. And different refrigerants for different purposes. So all that amounts to a pile of really bad refrigerants (cfcs), newer refrigerants (high GWP), and the newest refrigerants (low GWP) with a half dozen or so varieties for each.
>The United States allows for yelling fire in a crowded theater

I don't understand.

According to the article you yourself link to, the phrase, in the US, has been a metaphor for conduct not protected by the first amendment for over a hundred years.

All that seems to have changed is the exact definition of "clear and present danger".

Is there a case you know about where someone literally falsely yelled fire in a crowd and it was deemed protected speech in the US?