> Quantum Entanglement can't be used for communication: https://www.quora.com/Why-cant-quantum-entanglement-be-used-...

If you’re allowed to cite magic allow me to hazard that ignorance is not conclusive proof. Known states may be pushed through entanglement, we just don’t know how.

In the quantum domain constructive and destructive interference is king. Ultimately quantum computing shall be discovered as a sieve, not a qubit state rendering. In our minds we don’t have one particle entangled, we have tens of millions per cluster. By the magical phenomena of constructive interference we shall discover particulate bound potential hold and change their state, like a sieve.

> Not sure it's needed as an explanation either; humans have good vision and mirror neurons and imaginations, such that we can read other people's expressions, imagine what they're feeling inside, empathically feel the same, without any need for telepathy - although it basically is telepathy in a sense; silent communication over long distance carried at light speed. Just not words.

The entanglement conjecture is not really “telepathy” by modern language it is “teleportation” and “wormholes”. Yes, I speculate to you the wormholes are in our heads, only it is information not matter which passes through.

These entanglements do propagate and are captured by proximity however they may be propagated through the very entanglement itself once established (with the help of the host neurons).

> James Randi's million dollar prize for demonstrating paranormal ability was never won. He did describe paranormal researchers being fooled and completely convinced by such tricks as a thin thread, or blowing on card to move them, later admitted by the test subjects

Sorry to burst your top-of-the-food-chain centrism, you’re late to the party.

Those who have perfected these things are already in “controls”. They conduce top scientists speak endlessly on the absurd impossibility of the claim (like a brain parasite the host is unaware of) before letting this truth be emperically observed.

For proofs you must look at the past.

I enjoy these stories about voices diagnosing illness. Some favorites

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232271307_A_difficu...

PKD is one such case.

https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/t...

This is not court evidence sure, yet there are many such cases which fit a pattern that a small percentage of humanity can run around among our minds like hackers on the internet. And these go FAR back in time (wish I had the space).

Thought control now regulates our minds, even our ability to think (or not think) of a topic may be influenced by these controls without our awareness. Hearing the voices either means your mind is very sensitive, or a network has moved in that doesn’t care or cannot competently suppress your awareness.

> Woo and the paranormal and medical quackery and so on have so many good stories, amazing ideas and awe-inspiring consequences, and great story tellers, they are rather similar, I think, and that science generally is the process of weeding out the irrefutable unarguable facts from the enticing stories.

You have been rooted, and your science is laughable.
If you think science is anything more than a disciplined way of handling our own ignorance and confusion you are self deceived.

Science is the art of undeceiving the self and should not be respected or relied upon for anything more. For everything else, thank engineers!

I’m not selling you ghosts and goblins, I offer a parody that parallels our waking life in the shadow of our refusal to believe.

Do not refuse to believe sir, that is unscientific. Rather accept humans have no idea what they are talking about and are only relatable by virtue of communicated experiences.