skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Ignoring the incentives is a key skill in science. And in all creative work in general. If you respond strongly to external incentives, you are unlikely to create anything truly novel, because you are doing what others are telling you to do. You may be good, and you may be successful, but your work is probably not as good as it could be.
And quite a few implementations actually emulate the serial console allowing for the exact same access. (Serial Over Lan or SOL for short.)
Making these kinds of apps is the reason 12-year-old me got into programming in the first place. So cool, kudos!
https://www.reddit.com/r/China_irl/comments/vqkfyt/

https://www.reddit.com/r/China_irl/comments/vr214w/

https://www.reddit.com/r/China_irl/comments/vr2lij/

https://www.reddit.com/r/China_irl/comments/vqfwic/

Take these threads with giant grain of salt though, they're far from thorough and some of them lack basic understanding of statistics. And I personally don't think the dataset (at least the sample) is actually random so not really a good representation of China's demographics.
Contrary to popular belief, there's nothing unethical about attaching a price to a human life: it's a very uncomfortable question, and I think there ought to be some disagreement on what the number should be...

But money is fundamentally just a unit of value. We use it to compare the value of different things. We can use it to convert between labour (someone's time, which is a fraction of one's life) and goods and services. We can also use it to measure lives: 5 statistical lives lost is worse than 1 statistical life lost, all else being equal. We can also use it to weigh years lost to disability, etc.

Note that this doesn't mean things always have a fair price, and it says nothing about whether money is fairly allocated in society. And it certainly doesn't mean that people can be replaced with money. None of this is the point.

As a thought experiment, ask yourself the following questions:

- Is a human life worth more than nothing, or zero dollars? (I hope you will say yes)

- Is a human life worth more than 20$? (I hope you will say yes)

- Does a human life have infinite value? I hope you will agree that this is not the case: if it was, then we would be justified in sacrificing all of the world's resources combined, in order to save a single life. The paradox is that this would come at the cost of all other lives, which is clearly nonsensical. Even a pharaoh's life, or a king's life, is not normally considered to be worth the combined lives of all of his subjects, from the perspective of modern society. Lives have some non-zero, but finite, economic/social "value".

- Is there a fair price, in dollars, for an hour of labour or work? If there is, then you accept that there is some conversion factor between a fraction of a human life, and some amount of dollars.

Putting a price tag on a human life is something that is so important, that we ought to discuss it more often. Whether we put the price too high, or too low, is often what explains political disagreements on the provision of public goods and services. We do ourselves a great disservice by not forcing ourselves to come up with a concrete number, or by not being honest about what our numbers are. We should challenge each other's assumptions and ensure we put a fair price on it, and ensure that this price is based on the things that matter to us as a society.

Judges, actuarial scientists, and economists, all do it explicitly. Nobody agrees on a specific number, but they all pick a number. The rest of us? We do it implicitly, whether or not we're aware of it, every day of our lives. The problem is that our value judgments and our choices, especially if they are not conscious, are often not self-consistent.

---

See also:

- https://fee.org/articles/marginalism-and-the-morality-of-pri...

- https://www.npr.org/2020/04/23/843310123/how-government-agen...

- https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg23230963-100-put-a-pr...

- https://asiatimes.com/2020/05/get-honest-about-the-price-of-...

- http://justiceharvard.org/lecture-3-putting-a-price-tag-on-l...

- https://www.porchlightbooks.com/blog/changethis/2020/all-liv...

- https://muse.jhu.edu/article/18688/pdf
Yeah it's really the luck of the draw when it comes to supervisors. Thankfully mine was very supportive both academically and psychologically, but most people aren't that lucky
You can do this kind of thing across the network if you have to.
I wonder if automating something like Nvidia Ansel is possible. It stops the gameplay and allows to take various screenshots and even 360 views.
There was a stoner kid in my US magnet school who, to the best of my understanding, did the GED to graduate at 15, then went on to the local community college. As far as I know they've always taken high schoolers for credit courses so this route would ultimately result(if aiming for a four-year bachelor's) in transferring with a pile of course credits at 18.
If you assume you make an ass out of you and me.
https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/
We are on HN, and the average US home price will not get you very far in NY, London, SF etc. If you want a decent academic environment (which again, I would assume most HN people would require, unlike non-HN US average), it seems like you pretty much have to go private in those cities.
I don't have answers, seems to me you're doing everything that should be done.
I do have questions that you need to consider

1. Are you having trouble getting dates? (Is the problem that you're not meeting enough people?)
2. If you're meeting enough people, why are the dates going sour? Are you leaving the men or are the men not interested?
3. If the men are leaving, it's probably a good idea to ask for an honest feedback from some of them.
4. If you're leaving them, it's a good idea to understand what exactly is it that you don't find great about them?

In my opinion. If you have a long checklist, it'll be very difficult to find someone. There are only a few things that you should look for.

1. Is He Kind to me?
2. Do I find him attractive?
3. Does he have any visible mental health issue (Anger, Depression, or Crippling Anxiety)

If these things are Ok, rest everything falls in place.
Meanwhile there's people alive today who claim main line descent from Confucius who lived in the 5th century BC.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kung_Tsui-chang
I think the baby is the logical choice for utility maximisation: he still has a chance to develop in anything, maybe he could become the next Einstein or save the world. But the 5 elderly's contributions to society are probably over, however large those had been during their time.
Probably more related to RHEL compiling openssl in FIPS mode.
That is not really the whole story. The Treaty of Versailles did restrict weapon ownership and the Nazis were of cause in opposition to that. But they still did not loosen gun restrictions. On the contrary they did try to disarm all their opponents. Prominent example is Albert Einstein who had to give away his gun. Of course that was mainly restricted to Jews and political opponents. The did loosen restrictions for members of their party and associated organizations who would not require a permit anymore. In a later stage they wanted to allow gun ownership for Germans for the war effort but as far as I know that was never implemented. Overall their main focus was to disarm their opponents.

Later the allies again implemented a complete ban on weapon ownership until around 1950-1960.
I don't think that is really the case here. It is more greenwashing of the intentional effect to subsidise expensive cars.
If you have access to the console (local physical machine, VM on a system that can expose the console, physical box that you have console access to via IPMI or other means), can you not specify that directive to be passed through via grub's interactive menu?

Failing that you could try the “single” directive and poke other configurations once booted in that mode.

A faf to be sure, but hopefully viable options (assuming the interactive menu hasn't been disabled to save a few seconds off boot time!).
>I hereby declare that if I'm ever going to be stuck in a trolley for my entire life, I do NOT want the lever pulled.

This isn't a democracy and I hold all of the levers of power.
Reminds me of an incident where a video was both marked as for kids and for mature audiences.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P28CKVT8TIU
The Locker Puzzle [pdf]
That pretty much makes the GPs point: emergent behavior arising from complexity.
I don't think parent necessarily meant "PC" like that, but rather than you needed to buy a pricey device to get into the space.

For example, the Atari ST launched at June 1985 for the price of $800. Adjusted to today's prices (via https://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm), that would be ~$2200, which is a lot for most people.

So I think the point still stands. The barrier to entry was acquiring the device in order to be able to do anything related to it.
Let's put things into perspective.

Toyota just recalled their first EV, bz4x because, I kid you not, the wheels where falling off.

I guess Toyota couldn't find automotive grade hub bolts.

https://mashable.com/article/toyota-recall-bz4x#:~:text=The%....

And it's not like it's an isolated thing. Cars from all car makers are being recalled for things way worse than LCD discoloration.

The difference is how much press coverage even small Tesla things get compared to much more serious issues in other cars.

Like Mach E which was recalled for potentially shutting down the drive train, another recall for roof not being properly bonded to the car and another for loose bolts.

GM's Bolt had every single car recalled for a batter defect that could (and did) lead to explosion.

Jaguar i-pace was recalled for "The front passenger seat frame may be missing fasteners, resulting in a seat frame with insufficient strength."

Id.4: "An unreliable battery connection may cause a stall, increasing the risk of a crash."

I'll take a yellowing lcd vs. wheels falling off.
If I remember correctly the original trolley problem was actually two problems. One was "pull the lever to kill one person instead of five" the other was "push someone onto the tracks (killing them) to stop the trolley and save five people".

More people were in favor of pulling the lever than there were in favor of pushing someone onto the tracks. This indeed hints that the more direct action, the harsher the judgement.
at first glance it looks like a more developer friendly tool compared to deno
FF took ages to come to mobile. Opera actually became pretty popular in Asia, precisely because they exploited well the move to mobile, and was screwed only by stupid commercial manoeuvers.
> The problem is that doing a Single-Page-App ‘properly’ is even more expensive than doing a mediocre Single-Page-App, which in turn is considerably more expensive than an old-style multi-page web service.

Is that true?

Having some experience with both styles, I don’t see a difference in time (after the learning curve for doing something new).
The notion of a "gateway" to stop at before you go to low lunar orbit and land is stupid.

NASA came up with this thing because they needed a station that they would need SLS to get to, and that SLS actually could get to. It has no value as a place to be, but only a place to use up SLSes at US$2B+ each.

The ISS served this role for the space shuttle. ISS had no purpose except as a place the shuttle could get to, and the shuttle had no use beyond flying people to ISS. (X-37B is similarly useless, left parked in orbit for months or years at a time.)

A lunar "gateway" to stop at is stupid because to stop there, you have to spend the fuel to stop there, and then spend more fuel to start off again to where you really meant to go. The only sensible gateway is low Earth orbit, because you don't need to expend any fuel to stop there, and any fuel you spend getting away is fuel you would have needed to spend anyway.

The claim that it is needed, or even useful, as a communications relay is an obvious falsehood. A commsat does not need a crew. Mars has an orbital communications relay, and no station.

SpaceX Starship is awkward for NASA because it can do everything expected of SLS for way, way less than $2B. NASA can't abandon SLS because Congress has made clear that NASA itself has no purpose except to launch SLSes.
They did nothing wrong.

(I still got 65 confirmed kills.)
> It will be ran by my own fund/donation with monero.

Well well, seems like cryptocurrencies have a valid use-case after all. ;)
I'm not really an uploader so I haven't seen the feature. Is it a "three way switch": "for kids", "not for kids" or unspecified, or just "for kids" or unspecified?
> The phone has a screen and sits on the dash.

It doesn’t take a leap of imagination to understand why a proper large screen, integration into the instrument cluster, and the HUD if you have one, is safer and easier to use than a tiny phone hanging off your dash.

You’re also for example missing out on your car's ability to do dead reckoning when there is a poor GPS signal.
Produces this, really fun:

$ vim a.c
$ gcc -o a a.c
$ ./a
Hello, World!
The Bolt is not available where I live. I'd love to hear your impression of it.
If we ended javascript, 3/4 of these crazy disagreement will be gone. And no one will be seen as anti-react / anti-js anymore.
By that logic, somebody defrauding a charity out of $4500 should be punished roughly the same as a homicide.

(Not saying that's necessarily wrong, just to give some perspective on the "fun" corners you get into when putting a monetary value on human life, and it's so much different from the value you get where you live).
MYOB and leave my porn alone.
In this case, it seems to mean "what I'm used to"
In ~2012 (I think) it was really "fun" to watch streams of people doing a race to reach the bottom of borjomi's website :P
Why can't we just make the people with the means of production (land and money) pay for the right to own them? You wouldn't need to steal the factory, in fact you wouldn't even want to.
>Except it's not up to you to decide which of these two will die

I'm standing next to the track switcher, so I'd argue that it is.
I reasoned that the trolley is essentially just a scaled down earth, and plenty of people feel perfectly fine living their lives confined to that looping prison.
Simply submit the relevant evidence, and in two to four weeks, you receive a 15 page report, stamped by the Inspector of Dicks.

I mean, that's how I'm imagining it.
You could be more impressed that some web pages manages to guess that the browser you use, that presents itself as a desktop browser, is in fact a mobile browser :)
No, I sacrificed some strangers pretty quickly.
As far as I know there is a single Tesla car in space and it's not usable. I won't hold my breath for a second one.
> Full electric is nice but carrying a 1 tonne battery everywhere when most people could do with 100kg is an aberration.

Though I agree with this, I do like having the extra range available if something comes up - and that does happen about once a month. And the Model 3 regens really well. I touch the brake pedal less than once per week, and half the time I realize that I didn't even need to.

Nobody was really concerned about carrying 40 liters of petrol when 10 liters would have met their daily needs.
Emacs is an amazing editor and never ceases to surprise in a positive way.

The only complaint I have about Emacs is its look and feel and a lack of a usable Sidebar. If they could "steal" that from Sublime Text it would be perfect.
I prefer to quickly get past someone so that even faster traffic can also proceed. It's more dangerous to keep 2 lanes occupied while a line of cars is pushing behind you. It's a fact that some cars will go fast, better to let them pass. Obviously still being safe while speeding... If someone in the right lane is going 95km/hr, I'm willing to speed up to around 105-108km/hr - it's perfectly safe.

The reasons other cars want to go fast/exceed the limit is not really something I worry about. What if they're going to the hospital? What if they're undercover cops getting to a scene? What if they just want to get to work fast? I don't care. I care about my safety, so better get out of their way safely. If I notice someone coming up behind me with 120km/hr in a 100km/hr zone, I am 100% speeding up so I can move out of their way. If I don't, all that's going to happen is them having to brake hard, causing other behind them to brake out of instinct... It's the fault of the person speeding of course, but people at fault aren't the only ones getting hurt by their actions.
Lol, the original video has been removed for violating the terms of YouTube. Too bad, wanted to see it now.
It's a trend. The world of camming and OF is highly susceptible to trends, like other marketing / business arenas.
But it's problematic to assume these problems are in a 0-context vacuum because that would mean your actions don't actually have consequences. If the world ends immediately at the end of the experiment, then your choices in the experiment don't have any meaning, imo.
If we ended the web, there would be no disagreement.
> I've always thought v8 is superior to JC cause v8 is chrome and JC = safari

I have never in my life heard anyone say they thought V8 was superior to JSC - what are you basing that on?
Perhaps add “June 2022” to the title to reduce panic? Updated packages that resolve the issue were released on 2022-06-10, so this article is a post-mortem not an alert of a new problem that could affect people now.
An extreme example:

Government builds a dam. It clearly recommends people to not build in front of the dam, it may crack and a flood would be a tragedy. 100K people ignore it and slowly houses appear: it's cheaper, better land, views, etc. 1K people choose to comply with Government and build in a safe but ugly and infertile area. One day, suddenly, a huge crack appears. At the last minute engineers discovered "a lever" to flood the safe area instead and save 99K lives. They don't have time to evacuate anybody. Should they pull the lever?

By limits of morality I mean:

- Free choice: if the people living in the unsafe area didn't understand the danger or didn't have another choice but to live there?

- Skewed ratio: if only 10 people lived in the safe area and 1 million had chosen to live in the unsafe area?
That may be so, but I've used very performant software that used Qt. The desktop version of Google Earth was a Qt application and was amazing. The whole KDE desktop is Qt, as are Ableton Live, Mathematica, and several Adobe and Autodesk apps. If a Qt app has performance issues it's unlikely to be down to the UI layer, unless they're doing something particularly weird. Having said that I have no experience of QML or how it performs.
> I have not thought about the <map> element for decades now. But it seems it
> is still supported! That's what I love about HTML.

Good thing you had no hard dependency on <blink>!
Bad thing you're not American.
Regarding themselves, there are domestic rules, regulations and laws.
For you, as a foreigner, no such protections apply.
Don't use hetzner for shit like this. They're EXTREMELY strict on abuse.
The "metaverse" is an education on the corruption and lack of critical insight from mainstream journalists. FB does a corporate corporate reband, mails out talking points, and suddenly major media outlets won't shut up about fantasy product that does not exist, may never exist, with no good reason other than an oligopoly told them to.

If anyone thinks this is benign behavior, remember we're in the midst of unfolding global energy, food and climat crisis. Yet a staggering amount of capital continues to be directed towards assinine projects. The lack of fear in the room is terrifying.
> A bigger issue (to me) is that EVs are just too expensive. You won’t save money unless you’re comparing an EV to a luxury car.

Certainly in terms of raw price, but a lot of companies in the UK are doing effectively a company car scheme so you pay for the car pre-tax (saving about 20-45% depending on your tax rate). That same saving doesn't apply to ICE vehicles (gets eaten up by benefit in kind tax).
I would not let myself die to save one person, but I certainly might to save two people. (There are lots of assumptions that go into this, of course.)
Ask HN: Why do people keep blaming others?
This is something I keep noticing in people. Even if they seem to have a broad understanding of a topic (say, software engineering), they refuse to understand why people from a related area (say, project management or design) do things in a way that might not fully appeal to them.

Most of these people generally have a high intellect and are fast learners, not just in their profession, yet they don't seem to be able to see why other people might have different believes.

An example can be found in this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HURvJDldVGA

In it, the author talks about why a programmer might hate Scrum. Going into it, I thought they might point out things I, or the dev team can improve to make Scrum fun again. Yet, the only people that are blamed are project managers, and
never the programmers, which seems to be the profession of the author. While I somewhat agree with their points, I highly doubt that it's never the fault of a programmer, which is implied in this video.

Another example for this is farming and politics. I grew up in a family of farmers. Ranting about how politicians are destroying our industry was 90% we ever talked about. If I talk to some other people, it's the farmers who are
destroying our planet.

Do people actively ignore other opinions to leverage a better outcome for themselves, or are our brains just not able to find a common ground?
Better yet, end the web and the internet and there would be no disagreements at all about anything web related.

The only for disagreements you'll have will be with the people in your immediately vicinity. And to solve that, I propose another solution:

End all human life, and then we've solved every single problem of the world. No racism, no sexism, no bigotry and no problems for as far as the eye can see.
Is it obvious only to me that we will have much bigger problems like a food crisis?

I don't want to ruin it for you but tennis will be the last of our problems...

Here in Italy we are having one of the most severe drought in years, one of our glacier has just collapsed killing a lot of people and we are thinking about...tennis?
"Modern" roughly means "familiar to someone born in the 21st century, and who has only ever seen computers with glossy, composited desktops".
We've been using fpsync (http://www.fpart.org/fpsync/) to backup our production NAS. It is basically a scheduler wrapped around rsync. We use some 10g NICs for internal backups...it's fast enough that the SSD's are the bottleneck, so we are probably going to switch over to m.2's at somepoint.

Having said that, external transfers across the net will end up being your bottleneck, so you'll have to decide how much compression is worthwhile to reduce the time on the wire.

Another option, if available, is dump it all to drives, and snail mail it, but I'm guessing you already thought of that.

Good luck.
> will wake up to the fact that we've completely hit a wall in our understanding of the universe

What makes you think that's a fact?
Thanks for your reply. I think BoM do offer some stuff. But check out SILO for easy access to historical data. https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/
We complain about Safari because Apple has been able to allow the browser to languish due to the monopoly WebKit enjoyed on iOS.

Any web dev worth their salt don't want total Blink dominance. We do, however, want healthy competition because that will drive progress.
Are there so many unmapped roads in the US? Or are there arbitrary variants of limits?

I use Waze in NL and so far, for every road it knows the limit.