skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Almost completely OT, but reminds me of a company I used to write for who for reasons decided that we weren't authors any more, but writers. Somebody did a find n replace on the documentation which lead to some interesting constructions like "if a piece has been writered by multiple writers..."
For... entertainment?
As an alternative I suggest just listing out deal breakers and following up with anyone who doesn't violate them.

Second pass is incongruence. The best advice I every got on hiring was to not hire people whose projected persona wasn't congruent; what that means changes from person to person, but it ends up being critical for close relationships.
I don't remember any announcement of the merge being imminent from the project itself. I remember lots of articles claiming that based on the project taking about the progress. There was some goal of ~2018 that was missed / didn't work out. But the "imminent" part became more of a meme people talk about than reality though.
There isn't really a "system malloc on Linux". Many distributions come with the GNU allocator based on ptmalloc2, but there is no particular reason that a distro could not come out of the box with any other allocator. The world's most widespread Linux distribution uses LLVM's Scudo allocator. Alpine Linux comes with musl's (unbelievably slow) allocator, although it is possible to rebuild it with mimalloc.
...no, the decentralized web is just the web.

Web3 is utterly synonymous with cryptocurrency. Plenty of people here understand what it is and what is discussed when the term is brought up.
> I wouldn’t host my material there

Why?
My mom is/was not a great person overall but one thing she imparted to me at a young age sticks with me today: "dating is just divorce practice; either find friends or be a sperm donor"
Age has a interesting effect on the reproductive marketplace. A young woman (18 - early 20s) is at her peak "valuation" as it were. Typically you will see the most prized women in that age bracket dating older men (mid 20s and up). Men are valued differently, how established they are in life plays a big role in how women value them so having some more time to get their lives together is a positive, up until a point.

There is also a survivorship bias at play. The men who are available in your age range are probably the least interested in settling down and having children. Due to the ticking of the biological clock, a strange thing happens around 25 - 30 for men where they suddenly are pursued rather than pursuer. Most remotely desirable men will find themselves attached at this point even if they didn't intend to be (I sure didn't).

In your shoes, I'd wager your best bet would be divorced men who have children. They have been thrust back into the reproductive marketplace often against their will (women initiate most divorces) but probably enjoy children and are used to being in a marriage.

Happy hunting!
Most of the ones that are gun owners won't "walk the walk" either. It's one thing to bitch or give an answer to a pollster, but a completely different thing to leave everything you care about and march off to civil war. I bet even some of the ones that think they are serious right now might buckle when the reality sets in.
Yes, you _can_ actually do that with the listener middleware! We specifically designed that to be possible.

When you add a listener entry, there are four options to specify how the middleware knows when to run that listener: 1) `type`: an action type string; 2) `actionCreator`: an RTK action creator function like `todoAdded`; 3) `matcher`: an `(action: AnyAction): action is MyAction => boolean` type guard; and 4) `predicate`: an `(action, currState, prevState) => boolean` function.

In all cases, the middleware loops over all entries every time an action is dispatched, and checks to see if any entry is interested based on those comparisons. For the first three, it's just "does this action type match".

_But_ the `predicate` callback receives `currState` and `prevState` as arguments. That means that you can write checks to see if "this state field has changed due to the action":

return currState.counter.value !== prevState.counter.value

or if "this state field matches some condition, such as:

return currState.counter.value >= 3

This is covered in the API docs:

https://redux-toolkit.js.org/api/createListenerMiddleware#st...

FWIW, skimming the repo you linked (which I assume is your package), I'm pretty sure RTK either does the same things already (creating actions and reducers) or has equivalent solutions (listeners for "selector effects", `createAsyncThunk` for the "async middleware", RTK Query for data fetching).
Ignore all your examples, they are completely irrelevant, centrally controlled assets that operate on a layer that gives the option of decentralized control.

Bitcoin can perform without a government - the involvement desired by some people is not at all, nor is it claimed to be, or understood by anyone but you, to be necessary to the healthy functioning of Bitcoin or other sufficiently decentralized open protocols.
When this functionality was published, about 0% of comments mentioned this as a possibility
Isn’t every (release-mode) Microsoft CRT malloc a thin wrapper around KERNEL32!HeapAlloc (thus eventually NTDLL!RtlAllocateHeap)? CRTDLL did it, MSVCRT did it, UCRTBASE still seems to be doing it.
This is misinformation, France 14 more nuclear reactors in the works: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2022/02/france-to-cut-ca...

Germany's CO2 emissions are on an upward trend now that there reactivating coal plants to get off of Russian gas. Furthermore, the decision to shut down nuclear plants resulted in greater emissions that what would have occurred had they kept them active.
So does the assignment statement in almost all languages I know.
Agreed, that's an unfortunate loophole which I already acknowledged; and as I said, it will probably be resolved in the future by software licenses that explicitly prohibit or accept the possibility of a hosting platform that automatically incorporates that code into ML model training.

> including GitHub employees

It would probably be different if GitHub's employees do it at GitHub's direction, since in that case they'd be explicitly taking an action on behalf of their employer to pull in that code.
Modded minecraft like Feed-The-Beast is fun because of the automation and logistics needed for the higher-tier recipes. It's kind of like Factorio or Satisfactory
Saving the world doesn’t pay as well as helping destroy it through rabid consumerism. Until we figure that out as a society, we’ll stay on a downward spiral with capitalism.
You might be surprised about the limitations of your copyright claims!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idea%E2%80%93expression_distin...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstraction-Filtration-Compari...
> How else do you expect to enforce it?

The protection of private property without violence may be considered the innovation behind Bitcoin. Big deal.
If the most-difficult chain wins, period, then Bitcoin is completely controlled by the miners. Nobody else has any say over consensus rules, and even if the miners violated the rules to mint themselves extra money, they would still have the "correct chain" if it had the most accumulated hashpower.

If the correct chain is actually the most difficult chain that follows the accepted rules, then you're still checking with a friend to find out what software implements the correct rules.

Most bitcoin people tell me the latter is the actual case, which means there's a level of social consensus for PoW as well as PoS.
The structure of a home is typically 10% of the cost. If you want a cheaper house, make it less complicated and use simpler finishes.
I am less skeptical since they're 3D printing concrete rather than wood.
Is the charge the same every month?
To the US military a UFO is an unidentifid flying object. To UFO conspiracy theorists and the like they are alien ships.

Stating you don't know what an object in the sky is , is a completely reasonable thing to do.

Making the claim they are alien ships without any proof is not
A warning would have been welcome, because from my point of view I was interacting mainly with other single-purpose, agenda-driven accounts that flamed me incessantly. Early on in this there was even a very creepy attempt to dox me or something similar and there was no obvious reaction to that from the site.

Anyway, sorry for causing you to ban the account.

Edit: I created this account not to break HN rules with, but to contribute my (limited) knowledge of dairy science and cheesemaking technology which I thought would be interesting to HN users, since it's not very common. I got embroiled in flame wars because threads about food invite ideologically driven posts, and because my username acts as a red flag to some users. Just this last couple of weeks I had three or four try to use it as an argument against me, to imply I have some kind of ulterior motive (profit?) for the things I post.

I believe I was being targeted and dogpiled on and that I was not getting into any constructive conversations with anyone, because all the conversations I cared to join (about food or about the environment) were always very one-sided and ideologically driven.

Oh. I also created this account because personal characteristics force me to compartmentalise my online presence.

It totally went to shit, I admit. Sorry again.
Tx count is less important than tx volume, which, for practical purposes, is arbitrarily large in the case of Bitcoin.
No, a fiat currency is one that isn't backed by anything (as opposed to commodity money, which is itself a commodity, or fiduciary money which is redeemable for a commodity). For example:

The OLG models with money attribute to fiat money two basic characteristics: (a) it is intrinsically useless – that is, it cannot be directly used in production or consumption 3 – and (b) it is inconvertible 4 – that is, the issuer does not give a commitment to redeem it into commodities.

Handa, J. (2008). Monetary economics. Routledge. (p. 719)

Bitcoin is a fiat currency, just like the US dollar. And you're also wrong that with bitcoin "you only have to protect people and the network". What? Bitcoin itself can't be consumed (because it's fiat, remember), therefore it's worthless unless it can be exchanged for goods and services that can be consumed, which means these goods and services also need to be protected.
> There are not, in fact, a limited number of pumped storage sites, and you do not, in fact, need any alpine lakes. Dikes are not commonly made of concrete.

There are a limited number of economically viable pumped storage sites. You can find papers claiming an effectively limitless amount of hydroelectric storage. The problem is that most of these places either already use dams for most of their energy production and thus don't need to build any storage. Or, they are in extremely remote areas where construction is prohibitively expensive. There's huge hydroelectric potential in Tibet. But that's incredibly remote and prohibitively expensive to develop.

> And, there are numerous other cheap alternative storage media, for places without hills.

Such as?
SourceHut is not proprietary. It is 100% free software (mostly AGPL) and provides tools to migrate your data between hosted or self-hosted instances.
I really appreciate this reminder . A lot of dating books recommend getting really specific about what you want Funnily enough, I’ve had trouble writing a checklist. I know that I want someone who wants kids, is loving , kind , healthy and into monogamy. I do want to feel physically attracted to them but I think that could take many forms for me.

I really appreciate the part of the story where your wife invited you for ice cream. Sometimes I have difficulty being assertive because I’m afraid of rejection or I have a cultural expectation that if a man really liked me, he would chase.

But as your story illustrates, it can be very important for women to make that move!

Also what I’m getting from this and other threads is that it’s ok if a guy doesn’t seem to immediately want to marry you and have kids, and leave a little more time for the get to know you phase.

And then the get to know you phase that lasts the rest of your lives together.

Thanks so much for sharing your beautiful story.
Uber: Hell of a Business Model
I think UX and terminology are two different points actually - I agree UI/UX can be clunky overall.

> "This is meaningful to videographers and colorists" is a not a great defense of UX for an app that is targeted towards photographers, not videographers or colorists.

I think you underestimate the amount of photographers who know the fundamentals, as well as those who are familiar with related fields. After getting better in painting, I now resent tools like Lightroom which obscure everything behind some magic. I almost always see what I want from the photo, and I need a specific result. Photography tools are generally inconsistent, and most are light years behind video tools in getting predictable results. I want pastel colors in Lightroom and I know exactly what makes them; it's a single operation. Yet in Lightroom and Photoshop it needs multiple tweaks which feel like a workaround. The saturation in photo software can mean arbitrary things except being an actual axis in the color space. It can use several intermediate curves without telling you, making you fiddle with the sliders yet still not get the result you want. And so on. I mean, I tried Luminar AI recently, and it has a slider called Punch; what the hell does it do exactly?!

There's a reason people are using things like Firegrade for Photoshop. Software like RT/ART and Darktable also does what it says on the tin and nothing more, this is a niche they fill, and I'm glad they exist. (although I'll admit RT still looks like an explosion of sliders to me, despite the fact I know what they are for)
I wonder if this calculation ignores a bit the effects of "meta knowledge". I.e., many of the "new" people may be new to this particular process, but may already have expert skills in the general domain of buerocratic processes - and therefore may be able to adapt much more quickly than a "real" newbie, i.e. a person that works in s buerocracy for the first time.

I imagine this similar to how software developers may be new to a particular project or codebase but may still bring with them general domain knowledge which lets them understand the project requirements or the intricacies of the codebase relatively quickly.
> - Rigorous, regular cognitive testing after for all licensed legal professionals older than 45. You have to pass a test to drive in old age, but you can sentence someone to life in prison no problem.

Possibly I’m focusing too much on this point as a lawyer in his early 40s, but would it be fair to assume this cognitive testing regime should be applied to all intellectually demanding professions? Like medicine and finance and, say, software engineering?

Not sure whether to be alarmed by your proposal and the offhanded way in which you threaten my livelihood, or take solace in the fact that maybe I’ll be exempt from it since I’m a corporate lawyer and can’t sentence anyone to shit. Though, really, mostly I’m amused by it and your serene confidence in making prescriptions about entire fields you seem to have little familiarity with.
The move is more of interest to commenters than the project itself, as an instance of an explicit action to move code away from GitHub, which seems to have gained the general status of "place where source code on <any project> is found" over the past decade.

> Lots of projects are on other code hosting services.

Yes, and they usually tend to stay there, unless the code hosting service starts doing unusual things with your code. The README of the linked project is quite explicit about all this.
I read many sections of a few volumes when trying to pick a textbook to teach a seminar in Oxford. They are really nice, which is not surprising as they have e.g. Jeremy Avigad in the editorial board. Furthermore, they are beautifully typeset. I required a more computational approach, so my favorite texts remain:

* https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-0-8176-4763-6

* https://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/lics/

* https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4471-4129-7

* https://www.lix.polytechnique.fr/Labo/Samuel.Mimram/teaching...

The last one is freely available, but also quite advanced as it develops all theory from the Curry-Howard isomorphism angle. I think it is ideal for advanced CS students though, and an amazing textbook due to the breadth of material it manages to cover.
This doesn't compound though - are we trying to get the general populace who doesn't use GitHub to use something that supports ForgeFed/ActivityPub?
On the other hand, it seems significantly easier - instead of trying to convert the general populace to ActivityPub, we're trying to convert technically literate developers and related peoples to use ActivityPub.

Also, for what it's worth, I quite enjoy my self-hosted Mastodon account and long since stopped using Twitter and Facebook.
Bitcoin doesn't protect private property.
You have admitted that I was correct in refuting you: all desired qualities of the current system can exist on Bitcoin no problem.

Then you moved the goal post. If Bitcoin is pointless because it has no use case, you would have started with that point and not been drawn into critiquing an aspect reliant on the assumption it is useful.
One would think economics would have been onboard with environmentalism a lot longer ago, but economics as a culture/institution is very much aligned with the ultra-rich.

Economics, the leadership and prominent members of its social network, were all too willing to rubberstamp the whims of the "elites", future of the human race be damned.

Economics the "science" is a lot like the police "union", the only acceptable union to the right because it keeps them in place, while economics the "science" is acceptable because it justifies their position and wealth.
Coffee can be an artificial/uncomfortable setting. My favorite first dates (depending on how wet met) were bowling, board games with other friends, or the shooting range.

Especially the last one; a little bit of discomfort is a fantastic icebreaker.
Research results are portable.

Every single nuke put into commercial operation, since the first, has depended for continued viability on coercion, either by direct taxpayer-funded handouts or by overcharging ratepayers in captive markets, usually both. There is no reasonable prospect for improvement.

Nukes were always the most expensive choice, and are less competitive now than ever before.
"The reason why people in run down neighborhoods get arrested more is because the cops are biased. Also they don't police run down neighborhoods enough."
You can extend your rail network overtime, a few stops at a time.
Unfortunately, I will never go along with one of your plans, because I do not trust your ability, or the ability of others who panic about the environment.

Bit of a Catch-22 for you there, sorry. It’s just reality.
This is because neither AWS nor Azure use referential integrity in any of their "cloud scale" databases. For example, Azure uses some hideous JavaScript-based document DB where things like renames, moves, and deletes are hit & miss at best. A never-ending whack-a-mole of bugs and issues.

Remember boys and girls: Being "cloud scale" means data corruption and referential integrity violation!
How does this work for areas like Texas where most of the suburbs are not in the cities that are supposedly subsidizing them? An example would be the outskirts of Houston where the residents pay for their own utilities through MUDs: https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/houston/...

It may not be sustainable for them, but it doesn't seem to be subsidized by the larger city tens of miles away.
But if you're using it for yourself you wouldn't want to put it in system32.
I took a class under one of the authors with "sets, logic, computation". I found this textbook to be incredibly good for both reading and as a reference. It presents things very straightforwardly (the language is simple) and clearly (makes good use of tables and diagrams to give the full info needed to understand something). The chapters are short and digestible. I forget if the text includes exercises, but I found the exercises in that class very good as well. I was actually looking for this text again, so that I could use it as a reference while learning Homotopy Type Theory, and here it is!
I was one offered a large sum and took it. It meant a 5 hour delay in Chicago but I passed the time rather pleasantly.
Copilot is using GPL licensed code snippets as starting points or for adding to other snippets as derivations. As a result, it's injecting GPL code inside to another code, or providing GPL code as is.

At that point the code needs to be GPL licensed, or it's a breach of license. It's plain and simple.

Triviality cause is hard to argue, because you can code a nice "trade secret", or an algorithm worthy of its paper in ~25 lines (at least I did).

So Copilot's use of GPL licensed code is not fair use in my eyes.

BTW, all my public code is (A)GPLv3+ licensed. I want my code to stay open, not closed.
https://goo.gl/maps/hs4VddRgor9y7s6BA

photosphere photo of the statue and intersection
just a note im case no someome hasnt seen those abbreviations before:

bcc → basal cell carcinoma

scc → squamous cell carcinoma
If the future of housing is more far flung single family homes (3D printed or not), we are so royally screwed.
That's worth emphasizing: I'm pretty sure successful marriages are based on people being committed to figuring things out, not to the initial chemistry.

It's trajectory, not starting point.
Here's an actual house built that way.[1]

They just pour the concrete on. There's no compaction or smoothing. So you don't get a flat surface. A "print head" that compacted and smoothed to make a flat surface would be more useful.

Like this simple curb making machine.[2] This is the size for making garden boundaries. A bigger machine with automatic guidance is [3]. This is making a mall parking lot. Both of these will make a nice, flat concrete surface.

[1] https://www.iconbuild.com/updates/icon-unveils-its-next-gen-...

[2] https://youtu.be/A06vfELMIK8

[3] https://youtu.be/UCgma2_u_E8
sourcehut in particular was designed with email based collaboration in mind, and I like they've stuck to it. There are so many alternatives out there for Github like pull requests.

There are projects like linux that don't accept PRs on github and swear on sending patches.
Obligatory Linus Rant: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/pull/17#issuecomment-56546...
Money is important, it provides liquidity for trading. It is based on trust, so it makes sense that it can feel arbitrary, but you simply have to compare a world where you must barter assets directly between those who actually want that specific asset to realize how much of an improvement money is; meaning its not so arbitrary.

What gives money its value? Well it depends on the money. Fraud, violence, trust, in the case of Bitcoin: cryptography and game theory.
I was giving my definition, which I consider the "industry standard" which is the one by OSI (while I have some issues with the organisation that definition is useful)

I however assumed you have another definition.
I mean to ask how the GitHub product managers and engineers didn’t catch it. I wouldn’t expect hacker news commenters to pick up on a design defect in the few minutes they spent thinking about this, but in retrospect it seems like something that should have come up in planning or testing.
Even if you controlled 51% or even 67% of the staking power, you would not be able to “rewrite” the blockchain to give yourself free money. A common misconception. All state transitions must follow the rules of the chain.
This was uncomfortable but there was a lot of truth in there. I'd end with an adoption plug.