skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> This is less than a decade old: https://twitter.com/JohnMu/status/1389322980547833856

Those are different matters. OP is asking if SERP is damaged if GA is removed, the status you shared refers to the question if pagespeed is penalised if GA is absent/present.

> John Mueller is a Search Advocate at Google

This alone makes his statements regarding Google heavily biased. I'd prefer to see independent (i.e. whose salary doesn't rely to what they say) researchers to talk about it
This affected my team and I directly. I had to recover a server from backup, we then postponed kernel updates when I noticed something was wrong after reading this https://www.mail-archive.com/kernel-packages@lists.launchpad...
It would live on as a ripped up painting with two wheel marks run across it and a very interesting backstory.
And it's ok to use the default seperator for whichever OS you're using.

It's gonna be a different path anyways when you're talking about windows, may as well use the right syntax.
It is not unique to EU. Just remember the Covid restrictions in USA in past years. Clearly fascist totalitarian policies. We are all heading to bad place and no one is fighting against it.
Cryptourism nice portmanteau
If we kill all the robots, they can never become our overlords. Right?

Right?
That's just from broadcast TV, where a VPN is useless. The website is still readily accessible for those intent on consuming Russian propaganda for whatever reason.
I'd sacrifice myself for five clones, not five random people. Or for the robots. Robots and clones have got it tough. Random people are probably dicks, and I've not been a great person either.
I wasn't trying to point fingers at the Dutch for polluting in the absolute. In fact they're relatively conservative in emissions, for a European country.

I was simply reacting to the various people saying 'yay for all the protests'. Because all this political violence in reaction to ecological conflict is just a taste of what's coming for the rest of the world, and I don't see how one can anticipate that with glee.
Linux on older iPads is already possible, because the bootrom of those devices has a flaw that lets you run arbitrary code:

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/06/developers-get-linux... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31624185
I strictly don't believe in sentience being possible for robots. I think robots can and may eventually pass the Turing test to a meaningful degree - but only on the end of imitating/fooling us.

So this question is more like would I like to destroy a couple of expensive robots or kill someone. I chose to 'kill' the robots. Some might see this as cheating or not in the spirit of the question being asked - for me, I can't and will never concede 'programmable sentience' as any sort of reality.
I voted to save it but it really is a terrible experience trying to see it in person.
I don't disagree but quality tools are about raising the floor, I haven't had to worry about a ceiling falling on me my whole life because fastener technology is very good
My favorite variation is:

A trolley is heading towards a line of people corresponding to every natural number. You can pull a lever and divert the trolley towards a line of people corresponding to every real number between 0 and 1. What do you do?
Maximum always seems to be 5k points, played two rounds on Hard and Medium. Hard is a bit goofy because you might just look at a hill roadside and that's pretty generic in GTA. Closest was 2m. Worst 1200m in the hills. I actually think there is no real place that I know as well as Los Santos, and I haven't even played GTAV for years.
> I support people who want a FOSS device that is in no way locked down. I just don't want that, because I don't want to play systems administrator for an always on tracker in my pocket.

Settings > General > Enable Expert Mode

Problem solved
They will easily do that if they know they won't be caught. Google has a history of similar cases so it's not something their management wouldnt consider for sure
I haven't seen much literature about the subject, but you have the Spaghetti Sort which is half funny and half serious (offering near linear time complexity)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaghetti_sort
But a toy drone is a toy. It isn't really super impactful if you can't fly it in a protected airspace.

A more meaningful comparison would be with an airplane (small Cessna, big airliner, whatever). Do you think these airplanes should automatically steer away from protected airspaces?
You really should check your ideological emotions at the door if you want to be taken seriously. I have no alternative but to accept your concession that parasite is a valid term for an unwanted pregnancy and that your dissenting arguments lack intellectual rigor. If they had any you’d have used them instead of dismissing me for imaginary reasons that only make sense to someone that adheres to a regressive belief system that’s perverted older belief systems from multiple millennia ago that considers unborn fetuses of incestual rape by religious leaders to be sacrosanct. To be clear, the only significant groups opposing abortion are Christian by filling or membership percentiles.:1

The fact that you can’t appreciate a minuscule difference in terminology, and the pointed intent, is all I need to know that you wouldn’t be arguing in good faith. demanding anyone name parasites children is nothing more than a limp wristed attempt at controlling the language used for the discussion as a propagandistic method to be used after a technical (read: pedantic on the level of grade 6 debate club) victory or worse, a legal win due to the erosion of the church state divide which is a flagrant violation of the constitution. I am guaranteed my right to abort as many parasites as I want by my adherence to Satanism as you must bring to term despite crippling defects due to incestuous rape due to your obviously strict adherence to your religion that considers unviable parasites a child. So please tell me about how America cares for children with severe birth defects sacrificed to the care of the state are cared for and how the regressive religions against abortion get the funding to guarantee every abandoned child a life equivalent to the American median. I’ll wait longer than I should because these statistics are impossible to provide because the GOP stops legislating for parasite rights as soon as they’re birthed. I’m also waiting for these organizations to give up their tax exempt status due to their flagrant political meddling.
But they are not immortal there are they (never read/saw it)? And it's 'slightly' bigger than a trolley with more humans so you can (and i think they do/have?) a small society.
It's one thing to run the full test suite across all supported architectures. It's quite another to run the full test suite across all supported CPUs. The vast majority of x86-64 CPUs do not trigger this bug.
The banner at the top is constantly appearing/disappearing. It’s super annoying, and this is just one of the issues…

Sorry, but in its current state your website is a good example of why webapps are inferior to native ones.
Also, it was not always women on the other side of the phone, sometimes it was men with voice changers.
I'll admit, I have difficulty believing this is a legitimate take.

All scalpers do is decrease efficiency. It's not paying someone to stand in line, it's paying protection to someone to get something that would be available by default.

Or maybe a bit of both, at best.
15 seconds migh be a lotof time, depending on the situation.
The obvious demo for something like this is a pair of tracking shot side by side showing that it looks nice and seamlessly 3d through the screen for both viewpoints simultaneously. If you can control your render based on the users position then you can adjust as they move and either fake or provide real (if you’re precise enough to target each eye individually) three dimensional perspective based on their head motion.

Lack of picture or video makes me think this is bullshit. The website design and company name don’t help.
He's talking about highway speeds. There shouldn't be pedestrians or cyclists there.
Swede here, it’s really prevalent in Sweden to just use first names irrespective of who it is. Your boss, boss’s boss, your doctor, or as the case of an athlete winning an Olympic medal: even the prime minister, even calling her a nickname[1].

I believe it is partly due to a reform back in the days dropping thou and titles[2].

1. https://www.aftonbladet.se/sportbladet/a/Bj4Lkg/os-2022-nils... (Swedish)

2. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Du-reformen
If you factor in the legal implications, the trolley problem becomes trivial. Do nothing. I'm not qualified nor allowed to operate train infrastructure and the legal consequences will become worse if someone dies because of something I did.
Right, you can run it in to a brick wall, ending the CO2 emissions and its usefulness as part of a transit network, and also, of course, depriving its owner of a valuable asset (the trolley)
You surrendered when you put a seat belt on.
The measured side of me always wants to err on the side of inaction.

The one about life savings is a difficult one and I think at a distance without the peer pressure or emotional bias of a high pressure situation I would certainly choose to save the life savings.

More interesting I think would be a question involving family members. How many people do you kill (by pulling the lever) to save a parent, or your child?
Screw paying a cut to the chatters or even the models for that matter. This entire business model can be automated with a chatbot and a deepfake engine.
>I’m hard-pressed to name more than a handful of web apps that I would say are genuinely good with no major flaw.

>Content websites are a different matter. A static or server-rendered content website with adequate typography and semantic markup is generally going to do its job pretty well.

I feel the exact opposite. Most web-based applications are pretty incredible these days.

It's the "content websites" that are insanely bloated and over engineered (and unnecessarily turned into "apps"). E.g. news sites, new reddit, recipe sites
Shanghai'd is already a phrase that means something else, anyways.
Mathematics [hey-o]

But actually, if you choose "pull the lever" after having done the maths, then you are probably a misanthrope. Either that or you believe very strongly in the theory that if you do nothing you're not involved. But really, you're just a misanthrope.
Wow! Like GP I got only 83. I must have messed up few things here and there!

My rationale was to result to default situations because that's how most of things work. Most of the general events are resulting to average behavior. This makes more sense when you realize world moves without your presence.

So by defaulting, I am ignoring my presence and seeing the result on what happens without me. It was fun decision to make.

In one case, I genuinely saved 5 sentient robots over a human.
I guess I'm stocked up on cringe for the whole week now
I try to avoid days where I need to work for hours on end without a break.

But sometimes it's inevitable and I can't get into the zone.

I then take Ritalin.
Thanks for the reminder that most people overestimate their own skill levels and tend to think they are better than others than they are in reality.

If you disagree with my post because you disagreed with my position that an algorithm will not be able to out-perform a live driver who has been trained to observe real-time conditions so as to minimize the possibility that they will become part of someone else's malfunction on the highway then let's discuss that.

If you believe that these vehicles will be embraced by buyers in Texas or other places with long stretches of open highway where it is safe for drivers to drive faster than the posted speed limits then let's discuss that.

If you just think I'm some kind of coal-rolling redneck, F-650 with truck nuts driving dumbass because I mentioned Texas then you are wrong on everything except possibly the dumbass part and you should just admit your bias and work hard to avoid being so judgemental.
> So all cars will be susceptible to "phantom braking" due to a bug or worse?

No, there’s no requirement to connect the ISA system to the brakes or throttle
On that billionarie has a choice to retire from running the gaint empire.
Well those gorillas are really hard to maintain. Suppose you found that it wasn't quite what you wanted. Would you poke your head into the Kafka codebase?
It seems to be missing the "share" feature showing step-by-step progress at the end of a round.
It was also blocked from various streaming services. One example: https://www.voanews.com/a/6468770.html
In real life, though, you never have either perfect information about whether your action (or inaction) will have your intended consequences nor do you have the time for complete/rational analysis.
hmmm.. i'm not a very mathy person but seems like an interesting question.

Aren't they both just infinite? There's no such thing as a bigger inifinite?

thinking about it out loud here tho I would say that every natural number is a BIGGER number than every real number between 0-1 because, well, 2 is bigger than 0-1.

but then again since you said corresponding to every number.... 0.000000to infiniitiy -1 is a number in itself, so, you have infinite numbers, along an infinite number of 'places'.

Final Answer, you save lives by natural numbers, because real numbers have an infinite number of 'digits' per 'places' & those 'Places' are equal to all natural numbers.
Make new friends and create and discover meaningful communities
Hey! I am Surabhi and I made an app to help folks make new friends IRL and find meaningful community.

Church participation is dropping massively across America and yet our tribal need to meet and connect with people hasn't gone away. We want to create a vibrant community-of-communities ecosystem to help people find communities around the things that matter to them- this can mean anything from sports to fighting for abortion rights.

As of right now folks can join a group based on shared interests.

Our next step is to allow anyone to create a community and help organizers and community leaders create thriving virtual and IRL communities by making it easier for them to communicate, set rituals and interact with their communities.
I would argue the people’s choices are appropriate.

In real life you never get perfect information, so doing nothing as opposed to pulling represents the humans uncertainty of the parameters in the scenario.

“First do no harm”.
That’s one reason I’m avoiding your shithole of a country.
That depends - am I bored for eternity, or is there interesting stuff for me to do?
It’s not even that it says “no”, in most cases it will be you tell it what to do and it does that while flashing a light on the dashboard to indicate that it may be illegal
The bay area’s aversion to any libido-inducing-anything was a mistake.

“Lets exclude people to make it more inclusive!” really hits a peak there and a lot of people don’t buy it

I’m glad to see this smoothing out geographically, especially since a lot of the same people move to Miami and partake in its allure and inclusion of body-focused participants in tech as well as sex workers
> You can swerve onto the sidewalk but

I feel like that's not realistic either—when you encounter these sorts of situations in real life, you don't really make a thought out choice because it happens so fast. People swerve and crash into trees trying to avoid rabbits, it's not a reasoned thing.

These problems do, however, come up fairly often in so many other areas. Cryptography is probably one near and dear to many people's hearts here—supporting cryptography directly saves many lives (journalists in totalitarian regimes, people in abusive relationships, the general wellbeing of people being able to communicate securely for a myriad of industrial purposes, etc.) but it also, to a lesser degree, directly leads to some deaths (terrorists are able to organize and hide their plans). Do you spend your life developing more powerful cryptographic algorithms knowing that it will have some small negative outcome that your work is partially responsible for? Or do you do nothing at all and have a larger number of people suffer as a result of you not having produced a work.
Funny, in my mind I associate all of those with importing cheap stuff from China and selling it online.
The people calling for phone sex probably don't get a lot of that talk otherwise in their lives.
If there is no free will, though, then there isn't an interesting moral quandary about you pulling the lever. You either do, because you were preordained to do so or you don't, because you were preordained not to, and in neither case does any morality or decision-making enter into the picture, since, absent free will, you are not a morality-possessing or decision-making entity.
It might not be worth worrying about too much.

Solid engineers will always find their skills in demand. At least, a reduction in demand is as of yet unprecedented in 40 years since the field of expertise emerged.
I know the Nobel Prize has had its share of upsets, but has anyone ever been deserving of a Fields Medal but been over the age of 40?
Plot show the growth of large language models
At this rate Just give jarred another 2 years
Yes, yarn v2 (now v3) is a bit faster than yarn v1, but don't expect miracles.

Yarn v2 is backwards compatible though. You just need to use the node_modules "linker" (not the default one) and it's ready to go.
Absolutely! I could likely find the issue but it isn't obvious. So the complaint remains: for this extremely common and predictable use case, why is it not more reliable?

The main point is that problems like this are spotted everywhere in daily life. Time delays without apparent reason, questionable UI choices.

The complaint is not failure to work - they do work and are often widely used. But the experience is suboptimal for no apparent reason.

Similar to the article - whoever did this [latest annoying thing] needs to look at the "more better" example and just do that.

edit: Tried to write a shorter comment.
>“San Francisco 49-ers, 4’s that think they’re 9’s”

>"LA 4's are San Francisco 9's"

being fit isn't competitive on its own, compare it to other places where people are active. there is a reason the sayings exist.
Are there any governments publishing world wide data over API? Couldn't find any last time I checked.
>You can't lie to people to get money out of them.

Ok grandma, lets get you to bed.
> fast apps/websites

And people say you have to go native to have fast apps. It's obviously doable with Flutter too.
This is an un-academic blog post about Australian law intended to convince people to pursue a personal injury claim with this law firm. Excuse my directness, but what on Earth is this doing on HN? I actually cannot think of a single online community where this would be a relevant thing to post stand-alone and not in the context of some discussion in the comments.
NIST rolls out new encryption standards
That's not a bias, that's completely logical. The only thing in this world you can control is your own actions, so it's completely logical not to take an action that will kill someone.

Think about it: The number of inaction's you have is infinite - there are an infinite number of different things you could have done that would have saved someone's life. So an inaction is the default state in this world, but taking an action: That's something that has meaning, and people chose not to kill by taking an action.

Aside from the above, you are assuming that 5 people is worth more than 1, but that's not something you can know, you can't know the worth of another person. So who are you to choose to kill someone?
I got an 82, so assume we are thinking similarly.

I am personally interrogating my response to this:

"Oh no! A trolley is heading towards 5 people who tied themselves to the track. You can pull the lever to divert it to the other track, killing 1 person who accidentally tripped onto the track instead. What do you do?"

I save the 5 over the 1. Only 15% agree with me. Why?

This is the first Absurd Trolley Problem (I think) that explained WHY a person was tied to the track.

I think the value of this hypothetical is in establishing the value of cultural relativism versus Kantian ethics.

In that framing, I'm really surprised that, on Level 27, 70% would rather send a trolley into the future to kill 5 people 100 years from now, instead of 5 people now. In almost 11K votes, this seems significant.

My view is that this provides evidence for the Bentham "hedonic calculus". (And I'm sure there are better scholars of Kant and Bentham than I that can argue for or against this.)

Here's a "political" example: Do you want to deal with problems now, or defer? 70% will defer. (I think this checks out, and is truly hedonic.)

So, I think the data, and the utilitarian approach shows: don't expect any of our societal problems (politically agnostic) to be solved any time soon.
A little different when you are out to splat them under your feet. That’s pretty traumatic.

out of sight out of mind.
No one likes public transport, but people like motorized traffic even less. It's a relative choice.

The option should have been between decommissioning the train, saving 3 people and a few tons CO2, and decommissioning all motorized vehicles, saving millions of people every year and having a real impact on CO2 reduction.
The article wasn’t very clear around this, but it’s not that every car must have automatic deceleration, it’s one way out of four car makers may implement this:

> The ISA regulation provides four options for systems feedback to the driver, from which car manufacturers will be free to choose from:

> • Cascaded acoustic warning

> • Cascaded vibrating warning

> • Haptic feedback through the acceleration pedal

> • Speed control function

https://road-safety-charter.ec.europa.eu/resources-knowledge...
If you are using the Python "cryptography" library, make sure you don't have the version 37.0.3, as it's compiled against the vulnerable OpenSSL version 3.0.4
Tesla is no longer the largest EV producer
If LA wants more water, I think they need to desalinate rather than diverting more and more long distances to populate the desert. I know that's not easy. And of course cutting way down on almonds is a great idea and needed, but still the central valley is already poor as hell and the water you want is all their little wealth. You have to think about how making these poor communities poorer and LA richer will effect people and places. There's only a few million less people in the valley than LA country. And about almonds, the enormous factory farms just north of LA need to be the ones taken out, not family ranches. But the thing is, LA will only ever want and demand more.

LA needs to figure something out to not be completely reliant on other places as they continue to expand. You talk about population carrying capacity, I'd say LA has already hit it then, very naturally. Use all that wealth to make some of your own. They just like to take with their might. We saw what happened when they created the largest ecological disaster in California history diverting water. I think we need to see they are serious, and they need to put up and make big investments instead of always taking. For every gallon we give them, they should have to create a gallon of their own. It's fine and true to say almonds are wasteful, but that doesn't mean it should be LA's water.
> have to follow the procedure for restoring from backup or re-mounting the root volume on an alternate house to revert the kernel version being run.

Or add `systemd.mask=docker.service` to your boot parameters to prevent Docker from starting.