skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Here's what I always tell soon-to-be-dads:

You're not a mere spectator to the birth; you're the mother's partner, the person who knows her best. During easy births, your job may be trivial, but during complicated births, it can be very important: your wife can be completely wrapped up in her own world where she's doing all the real work, and everybody around you is working on the technical-medical side of things. You're the only one who can get inside her head and tell how she's doing, and communicate that to the medical experts. And sometimes this is important.

During our first pregnancy, I interfered twice, and both times I turned out to be correct. It was a complicated pregnancy that took forever. My wife was at risk of preclampsia, they put her on oxitocin (I think?) to stimulate contractions, and at some point, the contractions were coming at such a rapid succession, that my wife had no time to rest in between. At some point, I noticed she was crying. My wife never cries. Never complains. She's a hardass and when she was younger, doctors have on occasion ignored her broken bones because she wasn't crying out in pain. So for her to be crying was serious. I alerted the nurse or gynaecologist, and they turned down the oxytocin and gave her a bit of morphine to take the edge off.

Many, many hours later, when she was trying to push the baby out, and the nurse and gynaecologist were encouraging her: "It's coming! It's coming!", I asked if the baby was really coming, because she'd been pushing for two hours by now. They couldn't really see. "Well, could you check?" They checked, turns out the baby was stuck behind some bone, and they had to use a suction cup to pull it out. My wife had been squashing our baby against some bone for two hours.

So pay attention and don't be afraid to speak up or ask questions when necessary. Don't be an ass and think you know everything, because you don't, but don't assume they know everything either, because sometimes they don't either. At a hospital, their attention may be divided between multiple births. When birth takes a long time, they may change shifts, and you'll be the only one who's been there from the beginning.

Then again, for our second pregnancy, the gynaecologist was urging us to hurry to the hospital, and thinking of our first birth, I thought: "Have you ever been at a birth? These things take 12 hours at least." We were barely at the hospital, and the baby was already born. No trouble at all. It was the complete opposite experience.

Also: make sure you're home during the first two weeks after birth. Your wife can't and shouldn't do anything; she needs to recover, you take care of her and the household. Also a great time for bonding and learning how to take care of a baby. Don't miss it.
Thanks, I didn't know this. My doctors' unilateral stance was in favor of fixed treatment durations.

The paper you linked reads more like an opinion piece to me (not my field, cannot judge), but it points to this meta-analysis [1] which supports your argument. Surprising that so few studies seem to exist on this link (~20 in the meta analysis).

[1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20483949/
Ah ok, was thinking your the head of adobe marketing ;)
> The endless pursuit of growth is usually a byproduct of ego or at the behest of some intangible idea of "creating shareholder value."

If you don't want to grow that's fine, but then don't go public and don't seek VC funding. Investors make money when you grow; they generally don't make much when you don't. Ergo, they will always be pushing you to grow.
My career took off with kids. Something to do with purpose and motivation I think.
> This is not some suspect newfangled technology.

Is there somebody that did a practical small scale run of this?

Hydrogen storage has a huge amount of issues that natural gas doesn't. By its face value, storing hydrogen in a natural container doesn't look viable.
You're right. My skill was hard-won! And it showed me how to make DL so much more practical! My first 2 suggestions are simple parameter changes to their existing software :)
If I understand this property it takes a specification and generates a formally proven parser that lets you cast the bytes to a struct or runs code to do something with the data.

All automagic, can’t see how it could get much simpler than that.
The ultimate build system should be written in a language with no implementations at all, failing this it should only be buildable using itself, examples of best practice being Bazel and Gradle /s.
You are again moving the goalposts. We seem to disagree about how attentive one can expect a driver to be, across long periods. IMO, decades of science on driving are on my side. But resolving that disagreement isn't necessary: even if you're correct, the word "deliberately" doesn't mean "didn't notice because he should have been more attentive".

When I mention your initial comment flatly lying, it's this "deliberate" claim I'm referring to, as the video makes it clear how surprised he is once he notices the Tesla has turned him onto a one-way.

I'm sure owning TSLA has been painful recently, and as I said there's room for disagreement about whether their overall strategy is feasible. But there's no excuse for complete fabrication about the contents of the posted video.
> I’d like to learn whichever language will make me a “better” coder in the long term.

Since the goal is to learn rather than to get stuff done, I suspect Rust will give you far more bang for the buck.

If you're arrived at TypeScript voluntarily as an alternative to JS, Rust's type system will teach you a lot about types. You'll also be able to take advantage of a lot of what you already know.

Rust will teach you more than you thought there was to know about memory. Unless you've worked with a manual memory management language before, this will be a big eye-opener regardless of where you go with Rust in the future.

But I suspect you'll be most surprised by how approachable Rust is. It feels like a much higher-level language than its reputation might hint at. The single reason for Rust's difficult reputation is the "ownership model." If you own that and commit to figuring it out and practicing what you've learned, Rust will open up much more easily to you. That said, you can figure out a lot about Rust without ever using ownership.
The irony of the "TERF" abbreviation (Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist) is that many (most?) of the people being labelled as such are not radical feminists to begin with.
generally sticking plasters over systems that are convoluted, unreliable, or otherwise broken

So pretty much every system not written from scratch in the past five years?
>Only a few high volume high margin restaurants are able to do in house delivery economically. Typically pizza joints where delivery is already baked in to the price as that is their primary sales funnel.

That's not true where I live (obviously, YMMV). Granted, I live in a very urban area (NYC) and most deliveries are done on bicycle, as the distances are shorter and it's much faster for the delivery folks.

Most restaurants near me have had delivery services for decades. Depending on the restaurant, they might have dedicated delivery folks, but others would just send a busboy as needed.

In fact, the big problem used to be all the restaurants leaving their delivery menus in building lobbies or even slipping them under the doors of non-customers.

Now the problem is that many of these restaurants are going out of business because the fees on the "delivery" apps eat up their entire gross profit margins.
"Only an idiot would sell the same product to everyone at the same price." with some good examples.
If we’re going to try to have autonomous vehicles, at some point these things have to be tested on real roads. Would you rather have a real human behind the wheel to take over in an instant or just have the computer plow through whatever if there’s a bug? When you are driving tesla “autopilot” you are still liable for everything the car does, you still need to be attentive just like you normally would. If the car crashes despite that, then you weren’t paying enough attention and that is your fault. In my experience any time it did something stupid, there was always plenty of time for me to take over and easily avoid an accident. In other words, it’s not going to rapidly swerve into oncoming traffic at 70mph. If you don’t want to accept the legal risk of what your car does on beta autopilot software or don’t want to continue paying attention to the roads while on autopilot then you shouldn’t be using it.
Once in rome I saw a car parked, a car crashed into it for some reason, and the driver just left the car in the middle of the road, crashed into another car.

I do have a photo of that somewhere.
i this you linked to the wrong unity8 ... unityx seams to be something different ... https://lomiri.com/ is the renamed unity8 that is used in the ubuntu touch phones now ubports phones
I'm sorry but I have to label this as a bad-faith attack. "dominates" in this context means being the fastest available, not necessarily that most people will buy that. It's like saying "the i9/Ryzen 7 dominates" and then answering with "most people buys Celerons/Athlons". You need to read the context of the conversation: it is about performance domination and not usershare domination.
Reverting to calling other people pseudo-intellectuals is really not helping this discussion.

How many men exist today? Saying 'Seeking those traits in women is hard-coded into men.' is not a 'little thing in life'. You're making a sweeping statement about billions of men.

What you're stating is your opinion based on what you experienced, which is a small sample size. Even if you met 10k men that showed those traits, doesn't mean it's hard coded into men.

And 'hard-coded' in what way? Hard-coded into our DNA or societal imprint (which means it's not hard-coded).

So I was interested in finding out what your statement is based on.
18-21 years of child-rearing seems like a long time looking from the front of it.

It does not seem long in retrospect.

Diapers seem to last forever, that time is but a blink.

Find time to spend with your child, because time is fleeting. Take pictures, keep artwork, have adventures. There is no re-do.
Since some people are talking about games, I thought I'd share my short list. My kids are a bit younger, and it's important to me that we don't introduce fast-moving games. We don't have a TV for this reason, stuff is just too intense now. I'm trying to recreate the modern experience that I went through, learning the joy of adventure from games like Sierra Online's series (Police Quest, Kings Quest, etc.)

All I've found so far are Lumino City, Old Man's Journey, and Machinarium. So far all 3 have been huge hits and exactly the pace I've been going for. We've played each one probably 10 times.
Fedora 37 Planning For Binutils 2.38, GNU C Library 2.36
having a blast doing carting with mine, 11 as well
Assuming from your comment history that this is a genuine question and not a troll.

Of the 100 or so people in my MSCi physics degree programme there were:

About 40 who went on to do PhDs
... of which about 30 are now academics, the rest went pretty evenly into the categories below, just a few years later

20 went on to some kind of elite professional services: investment banking, consulting, law or into large corporate management graduate programmes

10 are teachers, tutors, or have some other allied role

10 are civil servants or work for think tanks or other NGOs

20 have jobs in tech in various capacities
Based on?

Here's some context: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neomammalian_brain
You’re absolutely correct.

I like to think I’m a good physician. At the very least I’m a highly trained subspecialty physician.

I could never work in a small community hospital with poor standards because it drives me insane to work with apathetic clinicians (100% a real thing). Additionally, given how much I trained I need to practice in a centre that can provide complexity (largely academic centres or major metropolitan non-academic sites)

This unfortunately does result in the bottom of the barrel staffing the “crappy local hospital”, but someone has to do it.

It’s unrealistic to expect high quality physicians to work on a small island nation. By choosing to live on a remote island you honestly have to accept that you’re not getting the same access to healthcare as someone in a larger city.

I’m not sure of any way to improve that.

Edit: I wanted to add that with the additional information cameronh90 has provided, in my professional opinion I can absolutely believe that his mother may have been misdiagnosed in such a practice setting.

Not uncommonly (forgive me for using this favourite word of doctors), I see egregious medical errors referred to my centre from very remote locations.

The issue in this story is not that the medical profession is apathetic, careless, negligent.

This is rather a good example of the issues in delivering quality care in remote locations. We can’t force people to move to islands and presumably an undesirable location for someone to migrate to so you end up with a higher percentage of incompetent physicians who can’t find jobs in better locations.

Most often the only times these types of practices get a recently trained physician are if the individual originally comes from there and wants to go back, a rare occurrence in my experience.
"When entire countries fail to confront serious challenges, it doesn't end well. "
>(If applicable) split the night into two shifts to maximize uninterrupted sleep.

My wife still tells people about how grateful she was for me proposing this. We each had a guaranteed 6 straight hours of sleep: I slept 9pm to 3am, and she slept 4am to 10am. We used the hour between to update me on any concerns there might've been, but usually to watch TV together on the couch.

For my advice, I swear by the Mayo Clinic Guide to Your Baby's First Year (https://www.amazon.com/Mayo-Clinic-Guide-Babys-First/dp/1561...).

Also, I tried to enforce a rule of no visitors staying longer than a few minutes, except our parents. People were free to drop off food or whatever, peek in for a look, but then they needed to leave. We couldn't entertain, and no matter what visitors claim, they did impose. Once he was 2 months old, one of us would occasionally take him to family's houses while the other stayed home to sleep.

My last advice is don't hesitate to contact the pediatrician with a question soon after getting home. Ideally, the first contact should be for an insignificant thing. Use the experience to learn the proper phone numbers or message systems, and get a sense of how long it takes for them to respond. Pediatricians are used to panicky parents with dumb questions, so don't worry about pissing them off.
> SPACs are mostly scams and most have done very poorly. You got caught up in one, reap what you sow.

This. OP is more or less complaining that they weren't able to unload their bags fast enough to maximize their windfall benefit from their involvement in what amounts to a scam perpetrated on public markets by VCs. Hardly a sympathetic character.
Turning in front of them, cutting them off, passing when doors are open and people are getting off, driving in the reserved lanes (sometimes even getting stuck!). Yes, people are idiots around them.

Toronto even has a tunnel for streetcars that's infamous for it:
https://www.cp24.com/mobile/news/enough-is-enough-ttc-to-ins...
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/about-25-cars-have-dr...

Installing a gate didn't even stop one driver:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/queen-quay-streetcar-...
You have good points, but how was transfusing blood to increase her hemoglobin levels like "throwing gas on a fire"? Maybe it didn't help, but it surely didn't hurt? And, isn't it sort of a good thing to raise hemoglobin levels, in any case?
Why is the guy an idiot?
Been spending lots of time on the subreddit related to the platforms. Lots of people wait to hear any bad news before doing any move. Celcius is down? Good thing I'm just on Voyager, it's all good! Lots of people see those events as isolated even if there is clearly contagion since Luna went down.

Lots of the people that had money on Voyager thought it was legit because it's listed on the Canadian stock market, thought there was some kind of FIDC insurance, etc. So because they didn't see much warning sign that specifically Voyager was in danger (even if there was!), they don't think anything applies to them. They might not read crypto news every single day or every week.

There's also inertia when it comes to finance. People might have stopped buying/selling coins through this crazy market, but they decided to park their money somewhere (on an exchange) without thinking that those go down too. They have been used for many years of coins going up and down, but not the actual exchanges going down. Most of those people were not in crypto when Mt Gox went down.

Of course you can see tons of people as well that have been trying to get their money out of Voyager/Celcius for a few weeks before the crash, but there was restrictions on how much you could remove every day, so they got caught while there was still money left.
Not sure what this is supposed to tell me. The number of cars driven by humans and vehicles driven on autopilot is different by a huge magnitude, so whats the point of comparing absolute numbers of crashes. At the very least to make a fair comparison we need to use crashes per cars driven in a day by humans and compare that with autonomous vehicles.

The fact that these bugs actually can be fatal, some even random people who have nothing to do with this test should be very concerning at the very least and not bruahed away as but x accidents happen anyway already.
This is model 3. You have to expect some compromises on the budget systems.

Do the flagship models (S, Plaid) have better systems?
Because they're led to believe all this public beta "testing" actually does something to improve the system. So they go out on roads, enable FSD and click the feedback button when it makes a mistake. It's pure theatre as it does nothing to a system fundamentally poor.
You're looking in the wrong place. The magic comes from TSMC, not Apple. Apple's major innovation is in using their unrivaled bank account to pay TSMC for exclusivity on their newest fabrication technology. As competitors gain access to that TSMC technology they will match or beat Apple's performance. And if Intel succeeds in reclaiming the fabrication technology lead from TSMC (we'll see) then Intel will beat Apple's performance again.
Coz Tesla has a lot of money and the government agencies that should be intervening are hobbled due to decades of under funding and being de-fanged by other parts of the government.
Typing in Mendon, Missouri in Apple Maps has the most small town feel a town could have once iOS zooms in on all four buildings
Almost nobody actually runs ARM in big-endian. I suspect although the ISA is technically capable of endian switch many SoCs wouldn't even work in BE.

I seem to recall trying to get uboot and and RPi to boot big endian at one point and it was infeasible.
Thank you for the update! We already have our workers working, it was super easy to set it up. I can confirm that the pipeline minutes have been added to my account.
I often hear a lot about you should vs you shouldn't. How about just highlighting your experience with? Not all companies, people or circumstances are the same. To me, it's akin to comparing athletes and trying to debate who is the goat. Just talk about what you did and let people figure it out. If their startup failed because of it, then they got what they were after, to learn and grow for the next one. Or, maybe to not do one again. I can guarantee you that for every claim you make, there's someone who was successful in doing the opposite.
I quit with no notice so there was no attempt to hand over. I was the only senior at the company (25+ years experience) and the rest were jrs (1-3 years). The 19 people that replaced me were juniors who developed whole new software based upon a monolithic architecture since they couldn't understand my complex Microservices based one.
Get a trusted, non-bossy friend who has a baby already. Use that person as a sounding board for questions or concerns.

The "relax" idea is easy to say, harder to do. Very important. Baby can pick up your vibe.

Longer term: The #1 best thing to give your child is to have a strong relationship with your partner. IMO, this takes a lot of work, especially if you were raised in a home without that. As much as education, safety, and health, this is the highest gift from parent to child...the capacity to have healthy relationships.

Second only to that is to earn respect from the child. Enforce boundaries and consequences ...lovingly. Learn how to fashion consequences to fit the crime.

Lastly, if you let your child learn how to divide and conquer parents, you are asking for mountains of conflict.
Terrible people everywhere too. I like hearing about the good folks. It invigorates my soul. Hope is important!
That is terrifying! I try to stay away from Teslas I see on the road because they are completely unpredictable. I think I'd prefer being near a poor driver with their attention on the controls to Autopilot with a poor driver not paying attention.

Any test on public roads of a system that performs like this should have a professional team actively, directly monitoring it. Not just any rando who happened to be able to afford a Tesla.
The rate of birth depends on the mother/baby, though its true that the first birth is often much slower. I'm a mother that just had my second, and labor escalated so quickly this time that my partner didn't believe how close I was and I nearly didn't get to the hospital on time.
So, trust your partner, and if she thinks she needs to go to the hospital, just take her (or call them up and ask for advice, I had the advice line on speed dial).
As was mentioned earlier, MCAS exists to modify the stick forces in certain circumstances. Those circumstances never occur in anything near normal flight. And if they do occur it is not like the stick force deviation from what regulations allows makes the plane not flyable. I've seen it described by pilots who have tested it as it makes it have a slightly softer feel for stall recovery. When the European Union Aviation Safety Agency was testing it for return to service they did full flights tests with and without MCAS and found that it was fine both ways [1].

So if something goes wrong with MCAS during a flight making it interfere with normal operation of the aircraft, then disabling it is quite reasonable. The odds that you will end up later in a situation where MCAS actually has to do something are extremely low, and the odds are even lower that the pilots won't be be able to handle it without the help from MCAS.

And that's assuming you are in a stage of flight where it would even be used. MCAS is only active when flaps are up and the autopilot is disengaged, so most of the time for most flights it is out of the picture.

MCAS seems to be one of those things that needs to have great care taken in its implementation because the danger from it mistakenly activating when it should not seems to be orders of magnitude higher than amount of safety benefit it provides when it correctly activates. They did not take that great care.

[1] https://theaircurrent.com/aircraft-development/mcas-may-not-...
In my experience appropriately sizing Philips is basically impossible unless the screw itself is marked. The #2 is way more common it seems so that helps with the default but if you know it isn’t #2 then you are screwed (har har) because many different size drivers will ‘fit’ and ‘work’.
The first million-transistor chip: The engineers’ story