skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
How many interactions were not online-based? I have no idea how much it matters in general or how much it matters to you, but I have had various friends have trouble meeting in one space but then have a lot more success in the other.

Another thing might be what 'sources' for interaction you consider, dates/hookups/meetings vs. people you already know. Lots of people meet each other by proximity, like at work, special interest groups (like sports clubs), volunteer work, conferences etc. If you consider what friends you might have and how you got to meet and know them, the same source might be a place to find someone to become more than friends with.

Lastly, is there a risk of forcing the issue, "looking" for someone to play a specific role instead of having a single interaction grow into more interactions, and then get to friendship/intimacy after that etc. Most of the long standing relationships around me (and my own) are based on organic growth.
This comment shouldn't be at the bottom, they're right. An alternate read of these articles is that Google's building an automated system to identify abortion seekers, and you should ask yourself exactly how much you trust Google now and in the future. There are also other sources of location data which will not be following suit: AT&T's funding is the reason OANN exists at all (Google it if you're not already familiar).

If certain justifications are motivated to prosecute this as some form of murder (which is certainly within the realm of possibility now), Google's location history having holes in it when other data sources indicate that someone's phone traveled to an abortion clinic may not work in their favor. They might be better off perturbing the precise location to something else nearby.

This is basically trying to solve the fugitive state act with technology. Nice idea, but seems to seriously underestimate its adversaries
Cable television showed that paying to remove ads does not work in the long run.

People who have money to pay for content are precisely the ones you want to show ads to.
Pen and paper exercises in machine learning
Well, I didn't mean that, but sure.

For what it's worth the numbers in question are computable.
Yeah, both the React Query and Redux maintainers agree that you shouldn't be writing data fetching and caching logic yourself. That's why we recently added a new "RTK Query" data fetching and caching API to Redux Toolkit, so that if you're using Redux it handles that work for you:

- https://redux.js.org/tutorials/essentials/part-7-rtk-query-b...

- https://redux-toolkit.js.org/rtk-query/overview

and if you're just using React, definitely look at React Query.
But it’s exactly the same type of complaint “salaries in SFBA are higher for the same job in Amsterdam”, why shouldn’t a Pakistani dev level the same complain about developers in Amsterdam?
I did not say it is. I just said the Python code the parent commenter posted was just like Spock, but for Python.

Also: tests like that can be provably comprehensive in the cases they handle (which can be generated, you don't need to manually list them all), but that was not my point.
I see in your other posts you’re saying 1 in 10 men you find attractive. Also that you’ve dated unemployed men.

So maybe it isn’t standards in terms of income, occupation, etc. that’s holding you back. It seems like you’re using attractiveness as the first filter. Which most people do when finding a mate. But given your age and your goals, maybe you should give a chance to more of those that you don’t find meeting your attractiveness bar. Treat it like a arranged marriage perhaps, arranged marriages often result in fulfilling lasting marriages (with kids!) that I’m sure didn’t start with outright attraction.
Your experience suggests you can solve your problem in one of two ways: Figure out how to interest the attractive men in commitment; figure out how to feel attraction to someone who will commit.

It might help to analyze what makes you feel attracted to someone. What were the moments, characteristics, or sensations that inspired you to conclude you were attracted to that 10%?
Is this real? There are some thirsty dudes around HN (who isn't?), and they tend to be high earners. Are you sure you haven't gotten to the plot twist yet where, actually, you're a Nigerian princess, and if only you could get a Western Union for $50,000, then you'd be able to resume the throne?

If it is real, though, I mean, good luck?
True. The shelf-life refers to how long one cares to remember the technology. The unfortunate fact is that these techs are so specific that I simply forget them weeks after I don't have to use them any more. The entire Uber engineering team had to endure the horror of writing hundreds of lines of oh-my-god-it's-so-cool-dsl Puppet for simple deployment tasks and waiting for on average 15 minutes before a change took place. Guess how many people missed Puppet when it was ripped off Uber's infra? Probably only the dude who thought Puppet and Graphite were the best systems in the world. And guess how learning the intricacies of Puppet helped anyone's career or ability to build better systems down the road? The answer is zero and zero.
"My time for having children is running out."

You like dates! You may be addicted to dates [knowingly or not]. There is nothing wrong with that.
I’m actually really open to giving people a second chance and getting to know them. When I have a reason that someone is not a fit I sanity check it with my friend. Im not the kind of person who dismisses agit for superficial reasons like lack of a college degree, socially awkward, height or slightly overweight. I try to be compassionate and see the good in people. I’ve endured a lot of negative treatment from men and I have to hope that connecting with someone im attracted to who is kind and honest and there for me is not too picky.
> solid attempt

Nope. A compromised attempt.

This is Google's problem; they smuggle in invasiveness and control in an attempt to conquer the web wearing a costume of benevolence and reasonability.

It's cyber-imperialism. The professed virtues are honorable but they have to be instrumented without the power grab
I recommend reading "The Invisible Partners" by Sanford, it might give you some insights.
I didn't get the memo apparently. I still think Redux+Thunks+Selectors+Sagas is great and that combination solves all my problems. Boilerplate isn't negligible but relatively tame. There's a straightforward way how to model state, and I don't have to put too much logic (especially async) into components.

But that's just me...
This isn’t a contradiction - the claim is that the only entitlement one has with open source is that which is outlined in the licenses. This is objectively the floor across all projects. From there, entitlements are granted by project authors and sit outside those granted by the licenses. The error, which is sadly common, is to presume entitlements of the latter kind follow necessarily from the former.
In some ways this feels a lot like http://alt.js.org/
Hi! You seem to be an exceptional woman. It has so many qualities. What man would be on your level? Powerful men don't care how much you earn or what position you hold. They have so many options that if you have a standard of beauty and femility, you won't attract them.

Lower your requirements and expectations. Look for what you have in common with the men you meet. If you look for men with status and beauty, you will only find people who are interested in status and beauty.

Automatically translated.
Google got off lucky when plus failed. Note the differing fates of the two companies.
I'm sorry you've had that experience, but please don't over-project your experience on others. Marriage is a mistake for some, but it's a good thing for others, and the OP sounds like she already has a clear idea of what she wants.
Thanks! I was trying to look for a video link in the article. I also recommend this year's Celeste and Lumione speedruns (which I sadly don't have a timestamp for, but I think both are in this same twitch video).
In my experience, this is mostly wrong. You don’t get 500-600k Silicon Valley offers in Europe just for being a solid engineer.

You do get a total comp that is 2-3x local market if you manage to get into FAANG like companies and even the tier below. I think this is what Gergely is describing.

That is still life changing for a lot of engineers, and worth the 3 month grind to get through the interviews. At least it was for me, and this article was a big part of why I made the jump.
I did actually have one that led to a long term relationship. I was very very much in love but ultimately my partner did not want to have kids with me , primarily because of a serious mental health issue he needed to pay attention to, so I chose to end it after a year.
You can defend international sea lanes (so shipping can go through), you can defend your territorial waters, etc etc etc. Defense is in the eye of the beholder.
Would you bet your life on it?

Because that's what we're talking about here in some instances. You're asking people to bet their life on the fact that a theocratic government won't be able to compel Google to give up location data for the purposes of punishing people for what the state says is murder.

So would you bet your life on it?
"The Great Salt Lake is typically bigger than the states of Delaware and Rhode Island, according to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). The size changes, however, as water levels rise and fall. The lake is only 14 feet (4 meters) deep on average so a foot of water loss can make a big difference in its total size."

https://www.livescience.com/56941-great-salt-lake.html
More like never letting your child ride a bike with training wheels because falling off builds character, and when they grow up they're bound to be falling off a lot and need the callouses to protect them.

Did your parents skip your childhood vaccinations on the grounds that a bout of polio or tetanus builds physical strength? Or did they prefer a more gentle introduction to let your immune system become accustomed in a protected, simplified, environment?
Not only does it have proofs, they're the subject of the book! You are exactly the target audience, someone who knows math but wants to make the leap to proofs. There is essentially no calculation, it starts with a lovely introduction to logical quantifiers and sets and moves on from there. By the end you'll have constructed the Reals and experimented with everything from vector spaces to the hyperreals to the basics of galois theory. LADR is definitely a good pick for after you're comfortable with proofs. They really aren't especially hard, but I remember how tricky it was until I actually learned how to start and where to go.
More of this. Middleware is simpler to grok than reducers and provides a clean, universal solution to async. You don’t need sagas, just dispatch events at meaningful points in time, like when a request is initiated and then another action when it completes. Pretty sure Dan Abramov taught this approach years ago in an egghead tutorial, if it takes hearing it from the horse’s mouth to get you to consider not just throwing more libraries at it
Have you ever been in a relationship before this past 2y? I'm just curious.

(My username is confusing but I'm a woman)
No I'm not. I'm just saying it's a possibility that OP may experience.
I just trust TLS. Anything to do with finances or Facebook messages or email is already using TLS, and I don't particularly care about metadata spying.
You're not going to like it, but I think the men you usually find attractive are out of your league

Also, unfortunately, in today's society, high value men have less incentive to settle down. That is sad. Someone desirable to you, probably is for many other girls too, and they know that

You might be a great person/woman, but might have something turning down people as well... I can't say. We, internet strangers, can't help without knowing you
You can go haha all you want but the only thing it accomplishes is intentionally misunderstanding what they’re saying and then calling them hypocritical for something they didn’t say.

Google’s whole thing is “better living through data organization.” You can criticize that mission up and down but it doesn’t change that for Google protecting privacy and the security of user data means protecting it from access by other people.
I don't believe the difference is anywhere near 300%. Maybe 20 years ago.

Let's keep Vienna for comparison, but benchmark it against Warsaw (also substantially more expensive than the rest of the country). According to the data on Numbeo, "you would need around 2,562.64€ (12,036.56zł) in Warsaw to maintain the same standard of life that you can have with 4,000.00€ in Vienna". Making Warsaw only 1.5x cheaper.

Gdańsk is probably in the top 5 most expensive ones (meaning cheaper than Warsaw), more or less at a level you'd expect from a city of that relative size (at roughly 450k inhabitants it's the 6th most populous in the country).
>but there were really compelling reasons it wasn’t a fit

Care to elaborate?
I wonder how much of this is the development culture at MS. https://www.theregister.com/2022/05/10/jeffrey_snover_said_m... (“When I was doing the prototype for what became PowerShell, a friend cautioned me saying that was the sort of thing that got people fired.”)

In that environment I can imagine nobody wants to be on the hook for messing with something fundamental like malloc().

The complete trash fire that is O365 and Teams—for some reason the new Outlook kicks you out to a web app just to manage your todos—suggests to me that Microsoft may be suffering from a development culture that’s more focused on people protecting fiefdoms than delivering the best product. I saw this with Nortel before it went under. It was so sclerotic that they would outsource software development for their own products to third party development shops because there was too much internal politics to execute them in house.
You are sweet. Sadly it’s all too real. And I’ve gotten just desperate enough at this point to ask hackers for advice. Hopefully someone can tell me how to hack love! Thanks for the good luck. Thanks for bringing a smile to my face and making me laugh.
For what purpose? If you use it as state management inside the SPA, it's actually slower than all the other approaches.
Sounds like vaporware in the short-term. Are there any shipped 100+ unit 3D-printed communities already out there?
These mathematical duels still happen today. The field of cryptoeconomics is full of online debaters trying to prove/disprove who amongst them understands the most economic game theory.
My two cents, and I’m no expert…

Trying too hard is unattractive and unsuccessful. Many guys get spooked by someone who is on a short timeline to get married. They’re doing you the favor backing out early. This isn’t an accomplishment that one checks off like getting into the right school, or running a marathon.

Do things you like to do. Find your tribe. Be open to meeting people in that tribe as friends first.

You’re also in a bit of a demographic trap because men yourr age can date women from 25-50. Is your range that wide? If not, open your boundaries for what is considered acceptable (age, profession, already having kids, etc) if the interest and respect is there.

Good luck!
While I understand the sentiment, I don't really get the particulars.

So, instead of learning Puppet or Terraform, you want to implement one from scratch?

I have that itch too, I also try to implement the basics of something like git or Ansible in my own toy system when learning it. But that's just to get some hang of why the tool looks like it does. I'm still there to use the tool.

That goes double if you're working with others. I totally get the bit about wanting to learn fundamentals, but not the bit how it turns you off some higher level tool.
> How is that in any way relevant at Google

Because certain people constantly use the fact that there isn't 50/50 gender representation in engineering roles as a way to imply the profession is particularly sexist. It was absolutely relevant to the conversation at hand around "women in stem".
Oh, sorry. That's rough. I got to the point where I was going to start invoicing dating websites for all the money I spent on dating (food, booze, time spent). I was in the upper double digits and almost gave up. I eventually just started giving potential partners more time. Some more than I should have. Eventually, I found "the one." I think it takes me time to build relationships I feel comfortable in. Maybe that's you too The rub is, time is the one thing nobody can get more of. Best of luck.
I'm guessing you're speaking non-authoritatively.

The cloud documentation suggests a deletion period of 180 days; so for cloud data, at least, when it says it is "deleted" it seems to mean it will be [fully] deleted within half-a-year. https://cloud.google.com/docs/security/deletion
At a guess, the dictionary contains "aliens" and "lie", but not "alien", and rewriting proceeds in alphabetical order.
> Because I've already watched the movie and now I want to know what to make of it. Claiming that it's all completely unrealistic 'because Hollywood' is a far more uninformed position than listening to an expert give a balanced account.

It's a action movie. It's designed to entertain you for a couple of hours. Did it entertain you? Did you enjoy it? What did you think of it? What did you like? What didn't you like?

Spoiler: You know the plot was completely made up, right?

I honestly can't understand why one would want to seek help on YouTube to know "what to make of" an entertainment experience which is an action movie with a made-up plot.

Maybe this is an age thing :( I guess I was watching action movies before the web was born.
Lol. I wish I liked online dating. I find it torture and only force myself to do it with a great accountability partner hoping the odds are I’ll meet someone great.
Vouching for this (it was dead) as a fellow Briton, and commenting to explain:

'to trump' has the same meaning as 'to toot' in the complaints here - i.e. 'to fart'.

I.e. this isn't really partisan commentary or anything to flag - it's just amusing that a sort of competitor to the platform being criticised for calling its posts a slang term for farting is owned by someone whose name happens to be another one.

(And to be really clear, that slang term isn't somehow named for Trump, it predates him. Or certainly his international prominence anyway.)
In Spanish all the French locations have Spanish spoken vocals on fremch-spanish accent, really impressive attention to detail.
Both processor hardware and the Linux operating system are powerful in large part because they're opportunistic. But that's the opposite of predictable, which is what defines hard real-time.
It sounds like you are earnestly trying. This is genuinely a difficult problem, so please do not get discouraged. You only need to succeed once.

A large part of the problem is that many men who wanted to be married are already paired off.

You may have to make tradeoffs for “willing to marry and have children” versus other aspects of what you want in a partner.

Out of all your friends who are (happily) married, could you see yourself with someone like their husband? If the answer is no, why not?

Also, if you are religious, have you thought of finding someone via those events?
Dating is game theory, both people try to get someone better than themselves. Naturally it's impossible to find equilibrium. Unfortunately Satoshi Nakamoto did not find a solution to this problem
I don't think that's fair. Basic proofs are fairly rote, but if you don't know where to start it can be challenging to replicate them. You sort of begin by learning to translate definitions into algebra, and only branching out from there. Until you get a sense for which tools to reach for when, you could bang your head against that wall for a while without making any real progress (and pick up some terrible habits in the process).
One for a casual gaming rig in the living room

One for a homelab with Plex and other things

One for a proper workstation

I am a happy peep
It's easier to solve it than to agree on what is the solution and to keep it. The more alternatives to redux there are, the higher the chance you get thrown into projects with some lesser known framework, maybe not even used to its best.
Also if you didn't push the consent button:

https://futurism.com/google-admitted-tracking-location-when-...
If that is true why do they concede to CCP demands?

https://www.theverge.com/2020/5/26/21270290/youtube-deleting...
Yeah . I think I’m going to start asking more men out on the wild. I’m afraid of rejection, but literally I have nothing to lose at this stage.
Not GP, but the following come to mind: Jai, Zig, Odin, and Hare, all of which aspire in one way or other to be a modernized take on C. There is also a larger class of languages I call "safe-ish" as they are generally safe for single-threaded programs but can exhibit undefined behavior from data races; this includes Swift and Go, and likely other newer languages inspired by those.
Within FAANG, there is again tri-modal distribution. There are people who are hanging in there in IC roles for 15 years and then they are new comers straight out of school with PhD in deep learning and multiple competing offers. Both groups make approximately same money. Then there is upper management layer who have gotten promoted well beyond their competence by jumping internally and externally and they make 5X of everyone else.

Truth to be told, vast majority of FAANG population doesn’t make those fairytale money.
Yet if we set up a game with a penalty proportional to the distance between your guess and the true number of children for a family, and you guess the median or mode, you'll be right more often than I (because I will never be right), but you will also continually be losing money to my guess of the mean.

What matters in real life is generally not how often you are correct, but rather by how much you are wrong. What you need to minimise is not your error rate, but the consequences when you are wrong. You are free to make an infinite amount of mistakes, as long as you are sure to make them in such a way that they are comparatively insignificant.
I hope this isn't too blunt but worth confronting if it's part of the trouble. Have you been very promiscuous during those previous 3 decades? For some men, that makes you a great choice for a girlfriend but a no for a wife. There's cultural shaming of men for having this preference so you might not hear it openly expressed a lot but it does exist and influence their decisions.

In case it doesn't work out like you hope, marriage can be a disaster for a lot of people, especially if you get into it out of desperation and tolerate minor ongoing disrespect or abuse, hoping it'll go away, then you can't get out because being single and even older seems worse than the little bit of human contact your spouse provides, and concern for your kids of course.
Even the CEO of Google would not have a credible claim to know exactly what is being stored and by whom and when.
It's probably more accurate to describe this as a new way of pouring concrete than as "3D-printing a house" in full. It's using concrete shot out from a printer head where concrete block or poured concrete might have been used. But most of the materials in the house are the traditional kind and will be installed in the traditional way.
I'm sorry you're going through this, and I'm sorry for the quality of this reply section.