skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Amendments and laws are the same thing, so no. The Constitution can refer to the original laws, or the collection of original laws plus all the new ones.

When Congress passes a law, the law (sometimes referred to as the Constitution) gets amended, hence it is also referred to as an amendment.

Edit: ignore this comment, my information was incorrect!
You’re worried about a law used by responsible gun owners. Criminals won’t apply for a CCW and will just carry anyway. How does the supreme court ruling out more guns into criminals hands to justify your concern?
> “All Coinbase Tracer features use data that is fully sourced from online, publicly available data, and do not include any personally identifiable information for anyone, or any proprietary Coinbase user data,” the spokesperson told CoinDesk.

If true, then all they're doing is analysis of data from the public blockchain. That sounds fine to me - the feds could have done it themselves.
Is this supposed to be a gotcha? That's clearly what OP is saying. What makes that unreasonable?
Great minds and all that, we seemingly posted this same article at the same time =)
> wire from an internal switch console ... rather than connect directly to an adjacent CANBUS that already went there

This type of design was not straightforward for me as well, but in the end this is because a car is topologically not an integrated machine with centralized control like a PC, but more like a network rack kitted with various systems, with user interfaces at the front and networking at the back.

We tend to look at a driver's seat of a car and understand it as an equivalent to VT100, and that is not what it is; the controls in a car are for each discrete systems that shares a chassis. Therefore the control goes to respective systems and communications goes through the network.
I have not, and now I have a new thing to look into, already firing up the browser tabs.

Thanks! :)
> But I wonder if there is really a market of people exchanging game copy for really high amount with 5 or more digits.

I worked at a pawn shop for 4 years and I learned a valuable lesson in this regard. Collectibles are never worth what they say they are because most people don't want them, and the people who do want them never want to pay full price.

To quote an old adage: a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. The bird in the hand being liquid currency, the two in the bush being a hypothetical valuation of a collectible sitting on your shelf.

There are extraordinarily few collectibles that you can throw online and instantly get a full value bid on. Unfortunately old video games is not one of them.
> I felt trapped in the suburbs, personally. Moving to NYC is what made me feel free.

Ironically many people would answer to feel free when moving out of a big city.

At least I do.
Ouch, I was not aware of that.

Deprecating Obj-C will probably also deprecate support for C/C++ support.

I never used Proprietary Apple tech stack, when I made games for iOS it was C/C++/OpenGL and these days Vulkan with MoltenVK

If they deprecate native code, they are going to lose a lot of devs.

Never going to touch Swift with a ten feet pole.
Udjat Agency is an all-service marketing agency, we’re not just helping you grow with the social media marketing plans and strategies, but we’re targeting to be your marketing department. Udjat is going to help your business as if we were your marketing department in your company, we help your branding, vision, planning your whole (offline and online strategy) and we work on developing and educating your employees in the marketing field to make more success.
This sounds like GPT-3 trained on partisan talking points. If it's not, isn't it weird that you didn't notice that Democrats keep promising to codify Roe but never do? They had 40 years!! If they solved the problem, they wouldn't have that to campaign on and raise money with. Keep people enraged to get their vote. You're spot on about that, but it's how both parties operate. Never solve the problem so it'll be there next cycle.
At this point, making fun of the crypto industry is like shooting fish in a barrel.
> If you visit a pharmacy website to buy prescription meds you have to enter PII.

Yes. And they are responsible for where that information ends up, regardless of how and where they advertise. So basically, anyone running any website at all should be really careful to not add any third party (e.g. Facebook) scripts to their page. I'd rather run a business not knowing whether my ad campaigns work at all, than run one where I don't know if I'm liable for breaking laws.
I just want to comment that this was a very strategic HN post. 3AM EDT/12AM PDT for the US, so pretty much all comments are from EU-located posters.
They’re ruthlessly efficient at persecuting the Uyghurs as well. I’m not sure “ruthless efficiency” is actually that desirable in a government.
I don't agree it will be chaos. Congress has for far too long abdicated what it is supposed to be directly responsible for to unelected bureaucrats that exist in agencies that are overseen by the executive branch of government.

Congress is now free to focused on creating chaos between the people that elect them. When is the last time you've seen anyone from Congress campaign on any substantive issue? I've not seen it in my lifetime they leave that campaign up to the president. Congress is invested with the sole power to regulate our money when is the last time you've seen them do anything except throw up bloated budgets? They have completely advocated that power to the Federal reserve of which they exercise zero oversight of and apparently leave it to the president who also lets it run autonomously.

So what you call chaos is reconnecting the actual responsibilities of our elected representatives with their duties. I for one would very much enjoy seeing my elected representative actually doing their constitutional duties instead of pitting citizen that one another's throat in order to get reelected again.
Now consider for a moment, who created this administrative agency.
Because those people feel that their culture/ideas are the correct one's and that the other county should change(Sometimes they may even be right!). They view the domestic companies as a vehicle to push their views and effect this change.

There are a couple camps:

Do business but censor, in the hopes that the users become aware and become promoters of your views

Don't do business as to not enable the regime to succeed and hope the potential users notice and become promoters of your views.

I think that for the most part, even companies like Google or Facebook will not be able to change a country, similar to how the US was not able to change Cuba or North Korea.

I think that there is a lack of understanding in Western society that other societies view their government/societal structure not as vehicles for increased personal freedom but as a structure to promote social stability over long periods of time(1000 of years. Something I think China is particularly proud of, for good reason).
No it's not. Anyone can interpret anything as anything else, this is proven over and over throughout history.

This supreme court has been stomping the other branches of government.

Congress created the EPA. If they don't like what they created, it's on them to fix it.
It's pretty crazy Coinbase makes it hard to know your total losses/profits. I imagine it's somewhere in the app, but it's not top level like in any other trading/investment app.
The tl;dr right at the beginning of the article states that these mics don't make a lot of sense.

People only read the headline and get triggered, not even the tl;dr can reach these humans anymore.
a nice, easy compromise they could have proposed and implemented quite some time ago.
> but arguably a lot of stuff in pico-playground or pico-extras is not finished

Arguably? They straight up say that the things in those repos are unfinished or otherwise not good enough for the SDK.
I really seems like this is about to become a pile-on against a company's actions based on a single tweet, showing one side of a story.

Even half-way through that one video he makes a comment/accent that (while I have really no context around) feels like a racial mockery, and some cursory reading shows that the same account had other posts (homophobic context, "buying NAACP shirt so these people [Black people] vibe with me more", etc).

Is firing someone too far? Perhaps. But this really doesn't seem like someone getting fired for a comment about bodegas.
-- from an outside perspective it feels like declined American manufacturing / skilled labour simply continuing it's reflection into the American society? - this started long before trump? -- bail out the banks > 1% hate > occupy wall st etc > "coastal elite" > state pride > trump etc > appetite in the country for the court to address federal vs state precedent? Could be wrong, just how it looks from the outside --
I've used these, and have two comments. High-ish volumes and high-ish bass result in bouncing on your head. And the microphones absolutely suck.
> Already somebody committed suicide after losing their money in coinbase and there will be more. Anybody who invested, guided, allowed this to operate is directly responsible.

You realise what you have just said was total nonsense and it isn't exclusive to Coinbase? It's no different to losing all your money on a SPAC stock with a stock broker that allows trading it.
Hey the article has been updated with an example! Direct link below

https://vadosware.io/audio/hn-throat-mic-test.ogg

(also .mp3 and .mp4 are there, praise be to ffmpeg)
If you read the dissent they seem to be claiming the majority opinion greatly expands the circumstances in which the major questions exception applies. Which would be a big hit to Chevron making it apply in far fewer cases.
They are the final say on legal interpretation. Outcomes are for legislators to worry about.
Linux: Optimize battery life and computer power with auto-cpufreq
> due to wilful negligience, incompetence

That’s generous. Slot machines aren’t negligently money losing. They’re designed to suppress your risk aversion and play into your greed and desperation.
This is the first I've heard the claim that VR/AR revenue is skewed to enterprise and military. Can you share some links on this? I did a search and while I found a lot of discussion of _investment_ being skewed in that direction, I'm having difficulty finding any evidence that revenue is likewise skewed.
Unlikely. Republicans were only barely willing to work with democrats after the latest in a long string of people gunning down school children. Since hatred of the environment is practically a party platform, they certainly aren't going to cooperate on giving the EPA anything ever.
Complete equality is unattainable unless I guess you birthed all the drivers from the same DNA into a test tube and controlled every aspect of their training and development. You have to draw the line somewhere and in F1 the team is within that line.
Of course it's more than that but the objections of religious groups seem to revolve around the bedroom activities much more than any other aspect. That's why I mentioned that specifically. Which I find strange because it's exactly the aspect they are not impacted by in any way.
> What did Coinbase do that made people lose money

An easy one: Facilitate access to the cryptocurrency scams of the century, mainly shitcoins.
You're looking at the wrong metrics. The risk of using a solo-dev product is them losing interest and stopping support (or as someone else pointed out, not being able to deliver the required level of support).

Both types of products also have a chance of being bought for cheap when they are failing, and at least kept alive on life support.
Because it was explicitly created with the goal of preventing majoritarian rule. The majority's interests are represented in the house.
Seems like a neat service. It doesn't scan endpoints that block unauthorized access (which makes sense) and points at the free trial of the more full-fledged offering. The only issue I have is that I'm very reluctant to sign up for a free trial with no idea of what pricing will look like.
> But from what I understand, the code Copilot generates is generally different enough from the source data that it shouldn't be an issue.

It's a completely closed system and they refuse to let you know what they used as source, so you will never know which is the problem raised by the fine article included Microsoft's refusal to engage.

The premise is completely unfounded. If I read the Windows source code and then went to recreate Windows functionality in Wine Microsoft would completely sue the crap out of everyone even if I didn't copy/paste Windows code. Why should we give Microsoft leeway?

Even Amazon lets you understand what licences went into the code you are copy/pasting.
You don't even need to go back that far: e-gold, liberty reserve.

Fun fact, bitcoin client had a poker lobby in it, and it was announced mere weeks after Liberty Reserve court ruling jailing its founder for 20 to life for money laundering.

Individual or groups behind bitcoin were watching that Liberty Reserve trial very very closely and e-gold/liberty reserve was very popular amongst the online poker industry ;)

There's many more interesting facts you can discover but I won't spoil them.
"All Coinbase Tracer features use data that is fully sourced from online, publicly available data, and do not include any personally identifiable information for anyone, or any proprietary Coinbase user data."

Misleading headline. This is a public blockchain analytics service that has nothing to do with Coinbase's other services.
One man’s consensus is another man’s deliberately bought off by an unholy alliance of special interests and stupid people.
Yeah, I stopped taking the author seriously after this ridiculous statement.
Comply foam tips make all IEMs all-day wearable in my experience. It's surprising how much of a difference in comfort they can make.
There is no easy canned answer. If there were easy answers to questions like this the world would be way simpler. Yet I can't even imagine how you can have a free society without some respect for the honesty. Without that at the very least people will start taking the law into their own hands, which leads to collapse and the tyranny of the nearest person with a big stick.
Can you point to anywhere in my comment where I’ve justified the murder?

Do you understand the harm Modi and his supporters have done to India? Before Modi came to power India was a country where different religions lived in relative peace. His government’s continued crackdown on free speech and the media is a disgrace.
The medications you're taking are a vastly different level of private than your income or where a flight goes. I think that's pretty obvious
"The world has never seen an economic phenomenon like crypto." - I'm not an expert but the whole state of crypto just looks like buying stocks before stock exchanges and market regulations were in place.

This comment is fueled by the prejudice that people just tend to speak about history without knowing it that well to prove a point. I might be wrong.
B/c the US is a union.

I live in a rural area. There are plenty of laws that make sense for my area that would be ridiculous in high density cities and vise verse. Here there is no minimum speed limit and I can drive my tractor down the road by attaching an orange triangle. I can drill my own well. I can chop and burn trees on my property. None if thus would make sense in the city.
So rewarding, thank you! Naievely, doesn't the expectation in the frequentist approach function as a prior in the Bayesian case? It's like there is a logical homomorphism between the two concepts of KC and SI.
They could rule the law to be unconstitutional. And they would do just that.
That could employ subject matter experts and scientists to draft reasonable and prudent regulations, hopefully away from the influence of lobbyists? What a novel concept.
Stating the obvious but... this is one of those things where you need to reach a certain number of people to reach a useful network effect. You need to push hard on marketing and onboarding. I like the idea... but unless there are people on there for me to workout with, the app is useless.
They're still investments, first of all. Crypto is just a scam.
They also can't enforce building codes leading to fires that kill a lot of people, have no real food safety and dramatically impinge on any sense of individual rights.
I wonder how this shakes out compared to having a consumer-friendly policy where refunds are issued liberally. I assume that over a long period of time Nintendo customers will become conditioned to be less likely to take a chance on something and lead to less impulse buys.

It's not exactly apples to apples but I've experienced the opposite effect with Costco where due to their refund policies I'm much more willing to make impulse purchases and to try things I'm unsure of.
GitLab is mentioned on the advocacy page https://giveupgithub.org/. GitLab is an open-core business, which means there is a permissively licensed FOSS version and a proprietary version. The gitlab.com website uses the proprietary version. In addition many features of GitLab don't work at all or work much less well if you turn off JavaScript. They have swayed a lot of ostensibly FOSS, copyleft-leaning and privacy/security-centric projects to use it, despite the business model and license.
The Supreme Court can just ignore its own precedents, so this doesn’t really help.
Overturn Marbury vs Madison.
You can verify gold with a vessel of water, an already verified piece of gold and a set of scales. It's taught in story form to primary age children with the famous quote "Eureka I found it!"
Thoughts:

1. Moving is hard. Even harder for people that have little means. Living in the state you're comfortable isn't going to work for a lot of people.

2. Currently, it doesn't feel like "the state you're comfortable in" will be that way for long in this country.

3. Moving to a country you're comfortable in is the same principle, so why not do that if you're already comfortable moving?

But to play this card,
> With all that, things worked out OK.

Yes they did, because politicians did their jobs. CFCs and lead were banned, pollution was beginning to be regulated by the EPA and European counterparts, there were a number of de-armament agreements worldwide, and actions were taken to combat crime and corruption.

Additionally, just look at the aftermath of neoliberalism and privatization waves of the 90s or the 2008ff financial crises: millions of people lost their jobs, many millions who graduated right during these times have lower economic prospects for large parts of their life [1]. For them, nothing worked out OK.

And these days? US Congress has been gridlocked since Obama and McConnell's obstructionism, and here in Europe Russia has invested many millions into propping up far-right obstructionist forces as well. We can't get anything done anymore.

[1] https://siepr.stanford.edu/publications/policy-brief/recessi...
> But the same irrevocability is now what makes me deeply concerned.

Strange hang-up to have. Irrevocability is not a trait that is fundamental to blockchain applications.

If the application is smart-contract based, irrevocability is a choice at the source code level. Just because one transaction in a block is irrevocable doesn't mean that another transaction in a future block can't undo whatever arbitrary state change was committed in the first. It depends entirely on what you make possible in the contract code.

Neither does the claim hold water for L1s that are the application (e.g. Bitcoin, Monero, etc.). If the entire Bitcoin core development team turned rogue, social consensus from the broader Bitcoin community would soon establish a new canonical chain. Hard forks can be and have been used. This is blockchain 101. Cryptographic and economic guarantees are not fundamental; the social layer is.
Yes, but it’s subtle. The mandate of SCOTUS is a check against the other branches of the government to ensure they’re following the Constitution. By passing a Constitutional Amendment, it essentially makes the contents of such inherently constitutional. A Federal law could be (and has been) struck down as being unconstitutional.
I treat solo entrepreneurs the same way I treat small companies that have a high probability of not remaining in business in five years: a risk. A risk doesn't mean I'm not going to do business with you, it simply means I have something needing to be mitigated. Typically I mitigate that risk via the use of an escrow service.

If you're not familiar with escrow services they are a mutually trusted 3rd party. You provide your source code, build tools, etc. - everything needed to re-create the distributed artifacts - to the escrow service and they verify that has been done. Should you go out of business or some other event in your sales contract is triggered the escrow company will provide those materials to your customer. My recommendation would be to find a reputable escrow company you like and utilize them. You can have them on the ready when you're creating your sales contract.
I have a 7 year old laptop running the same installation of Arch I put on it when I first bought it. Bang up to date and solid as a rock.
have you met any congress personnel? fence posts would be insulted to be compared to some of them.

there's definitely a gap between regulatory officials making regulations and legislature codifying the details. This is where appointing heads of those departments is supposed to come to bear.

It's a mess, but the answer isn't to let lobbyists and special interests burn the house down.
I've argued in another thread that we can expect those adverse effects to decrease as hype dies down and the coinbase reward for bitcoin and others decreases.
After this fiasco, I wonder how many of Stephen Wolfram's claimed results are just his employees ideas with true author names filled off.
I mean there are a lot of people who are looking into moving to China. I suspect this line is going to age like milk in the next few years.
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people."

Abortion regulation powers were not delegated within the US Constitution and therefore those powers go to the states.
We can do the same kinds of things in war time and have.
Sure. There is perhaps a moral/ethical responsibility. But there are laws against sharing sensitive info and I don't think "I didn't know FB scripts did that" helps. FB's entire business is gobbling up user data. And pharmacies business is to know who they share sensitive data with.
I don't think it's too much to ask to require siteowners to understand what the scripts they use are actually doing, at least if they deal with sensitive data.

For example, I don't think pharmacies should do any kind of advertising on FB, or do any kind of campaign tracking/conversion measuring etc on the same site they accept user data. As will all GDPR violations, if just a few large pharmacies were fined out of existence, I bet the rest would quickly fall in line.
Kraken.
Everyone stating this is a good thing because it's not the Supreme Court's job to do xyz are conveniently ignoring the fact these decisions are being made due to tribalism, not out of some concern for rule of law.
In „their“ mind that a very „bad“ thing, I guess.