skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It seems to me like they are considering outcomes. I'm not sure how we know for sure if they are or not, we don't know what's in their heads. But this court appears to many like they've got some outcomes in mind and are fitting the law to them.

And, I mean, Trump literally said that he could guarantee he was going to appoint justices that would overturn Roe, and then they did, as he guaranteed. That's an outcome, right?
HN is already a victim in the info wars, as is any successful or popular public forum
You're ignoring the fact that there are several philosophies behind constitutional interpretation, and that the dominant philosophy which you list here ("sole job is to interpret laws through the lens of the Constitution"), also called Originalism, is a recent creation by Scalia.
What the US has is (intentionally and explicitly) not a democracy. It has a wide array of structures intended to undermine the will of the majority.
Intel Processors over the Years
> why does ICE even need it, and why wouldn't they be able to get it themselves? (I'm actually asking, if you know I'd love to hear).

ICE doesn't know how to get it and Coinbase does, probably.

HTML is free, yet it's common for companies to hire other companies to build with it.
Maybe I do understand: I usually work from Windows, because I prefer the "frontend" over linux. However, all my work I do in WSL. Which allows me having multiple terminals open, multiple Linux OS etc. It is easy to copy&paste code. Perhaps it is not so easy doing everything with plain terminal in linux, e.g. vim, tmux (or, lets say, it requires a longer time to learn doing quick).
Term limits are possible with a congressional vote; an impeachment process already exists, and the only time it was invoked against a Justice was 1804.

Don't mistake politicians' unwillingness to do something for an inability to do it.
I don't agree that fairness requires service providers to provide open APIs. Open APIs are better, ceteris paribus, but that's as far as it goes.
Unfortunately you are right, dishonesty is something you can account for. I'll dishonest over incompetent any day of the week. At least dishonest bears less risk of running an org into the ground than incompetent. if it is both, run as fast as possible.
Show HN: Using Breadth-first search as a pathfinder
Legislation often deliberately leaves interpretation of statutes to the agencies implementing the laws. The legislation can just say "The parks department shall keep the park safe and well-maintained," without specifying what 'safe' means, or how often they collect the trash.
More likely, in North America at least, we would have an accepted exchange rate for 9mm and 5.56 and I'd need more than a can of beans for one cartridge.

I unironically suggest having a box or two as a hedge, no associated weapon needed.
A political supreme court would be a Republican supreme court, presently, meaning this is actually a high point for how happy Democrats should be about textual originalism.
>>That may even be "constitutionally" correct

This is the entire purpose of SCOTUS. They are not supposed to wade into politics. It is the same beef I have with Powell and his giving in to political demands. There is a reason you have the power and independence you do. It is not to please everyone.

I get that people will disagree, but ends do not justify the means.
It means power remains at the corporate level.
Programming languages can be similar to bacterial DNA. Even if the language never gains broad acceptance, parts of it may be incorporated into other languages.
I've heard of it but I doubt it actually exists. There's no real mission for it that can't be done better by satellites or low-observable drones.
I don't think the people who made this site are interested in presenting an honest analysis of this topic. It looks like straight up propaganda, with a massive amount of ads.

Can you find me a source that presents more than one perspective on this topic, like perhaps on Wikipedia?
> Anyone paying attention was pretty certain Trump was going to win that. All you had to do was look at Trumps subreddit vs Hilarys. Look at Trumps rally turnouts.

How'd that work out in 2020?
Gitea (and a few others) are working on federation for pull requests, which would allow someone to fork your project to their own server, and send a pull request offering you to merge from their server into yours.

It also builds on top of ActivityPub which is supposed to allow federation with the greater ActivityPub ecosystem ("fediverse"). I guess this would allow people to like or comment your issue or pull request from Mastodon and those other platforms.

I am not that excited about that last part, but federating pull requests sounds like a killer feature and a necessary step for a chance to topple GitHub. If hosting my own forge means I have to either get patches over email or let people register so they can create their own fork here, it's a non-starter for many.

edit: here is Gitea's issue: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/18240
Huh? It's the executive's job to execute the laws - which is exactly what they were doing, until the court changed it mind on how that should be done.

If this was true it would have been the case for all previous court panels. That it's not shows that it's the court playing politics now.
So is this just MIT being MIT (overhyping everything) or did this guy and his team somehow miss all of this? Is our scientific knowledge really that scattered?
One thing to consider would be Kafka. When a webhook comes in, you publish a message to your topic that includes some reference to the user such as the payment id or user id. Each server consumes from the topic and if it finds a message for which it has an active websocket (or long polling) connection, then it pushes that message back to the user. This page shows how to have all consumers consume all messages: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23136500/how-kafka-broad.... Spring Boot has really convenient integration with Kafka which makes setup pretty straightforward. The AWS Kafka service is also quite easy to setup. Having all servers consume doesn't scale ideally since more payments and webooks will result in more kafka messages sent to each server, but partitioning would probably be too tricky with a variable number of servers due to autoscaling.

Another approach could be to save the association between the server and the session in a database. When a webhook comes in, if the current server doesn't have the target session, lookup which server does and make a request to an internal endpoint on that server to send the message over.

You could also look into Redis for this. Have the server which is handling the websocket subscribe to key changes for a key associated with the user's payment. When a webhook is received, just update that key in Redis
There were no safety cars back then. If you look for races of the 80s on YouTube you can see cars parked all over the place and becoming part of the track (especially at Monaco.)

If you look for races in the 70s and early 80s you can see photographers on the grass at the inside of the curves.

And the invasions at Monza when the cars were going back to the pits after the end of the race. This is one of the last ones

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkFcSECEQA0
Highly personal opinion:

Congress is no more respecting the will of the people than the executive branch, nor the Supreme Court.

They're all respecting their own opinions, followed only by the will of the lobbyists.
No they aren't, because of the Equal Protection Clause.
Not every enemy is Hitler, but the one trying to find more Lebensraum for his völkisch ideology certainly is :-).

Perhaps if you educate yourself more about the era you might see the parallels more clearly.

You say "slowly throttling the economies", I say finally giving us a reason to accelerate investment in renewables before climate change kills us all.
Here's the source code for my pathfinder. I wrote this code a long time ago, but I think the visualization gives it a nice touch. Hope you like it.
"Rather than return a list of Google search results, Siri uses Wolfram Alpha to generate what it believes is the correct answer."

https://www.siriuserguide.com/what-is-wolfram-alpha/
https://www.siriuserguide.com/how-to-use-siri-knowledge/

"Siri Knowledge uses a combination of web searches, inbuilt apps, and Wolfram Alpha to find the answers to a fantastic variety of questions."

If you ask Wolfram Alpha for more information about Siri:
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Siri

It returns:

"Siri is a personal assistant application for iOS. The application was first available from the App Store, then came standard on Apple's mobile devices starting with iPhone 4S. Siri uses natural language processing to answer questions and perform actions by delegating requests to an expanding set of web services, including Wolfram|Alpha."
The dog provides the motivation to take a daily walk.

Don't get a dog for this reason, because once you've convinced yourself that the dog doesn't need a walk every day, then you and a dog get fat sitting on the couch watching Netflix. As a lifelong distance runner, I am well aware that the hardest step is the one out the front door, but don't for an instance think that a dog is going to fix that long-term.
The core of Malevich’s ‘artistic expression’ in his Black Square is buried in parentheses a paragraph or two before the end:

> Black Square was not simply a two-dimensional surface, parallel to a single wall and projecting outwards from it in one direction. Judging from the way it was displayed when first exhibited in 1915 — across the corner of the room (like a Russian icon) and as high up as possible — it was required to project from two walls and the ceiling, i.e. in three dimensions, embracing the room over which it presided as a cubic space.

Black Square’s artistic merit is precisely because it was intended to occupy the space in the room that an icon traditionally would, and implied the absence (or rejection) of God.
I have no intent on living through a new North Korea, a new Russia, a new Greater German Reich, or a Gilead.

We're only a few years away from the collapse. It is a smart move to escape while you can. If I need heart pills or insulin in the future and they can't be made safe, then it won't be safe if you have any medical issues. If the water won't be safe because we couldn't regulate new chemicals invented, then it won't be safe to live here. If it isn't safe to have a pregnancy, because they've decided to sentence to death those with an ectopic pregnancy, why should you stay?
> I read the rulings myself too

[X] Doubt
> Imagine if you could do it in seconds via a mobile wallet app that works anywhere in the EU?

There's mention of "mobile" with no corresponding mention of desktops or operating systems, so it seems safe to assume that the app will only work on iOS and Android phones (and probably not even rooted Android devices).
The buerocrats take their orders from the president, and if they don't can be overruled and fired by the president, who is elected by the people every 4 years. That's a pretty big difference, no?
Yes, exactly, that is terrible latency if you want to use it as an input device.
Based on your first example of running git send-email without providing it any patch files or revision list, you appear to be making the assumption that someone doesn't bother reading the documentation before using the tool.

This would be like someone trying out make the first time and not realizing why it isn't working becaue they didn't realize they need literal tab characters in the make file for the rules to work. But if they don't read the documentation, there's no way they would know that.

The real problem is people trying to figure out how tools work by experimentation as opposed to reading documentation. If someone reads the documentation of git send-email and the project's contrib document contains the preferred settings for that utility, then submitting patches should not be an issue.
For argument sake, lets say it was as stable as the price of Silver...
Growing up in SF I had a ringside seat for the "enclosure" of gay culture by-- I don't want to say "corporate", although that's a big part of it-- a lot of corporate execs are openly gay now, eh?

Anyway, Gay Pride and especially the Castro Halloween celebration went from being subversive to mainstream and the celebration itself literally became more exclusive, with fences and then ticket sales. Now it's the theme-park version of itself.

Same with Haight St. and the hippie culture: packaged up into a theme-park of itself. The actual hippies are marginalized in favor of tourism and consumerism.
Excellent point. This also lends to it being easier for US tax subjects to use the dollar as a unit of account and ignore its (small, but not insignificant and always trending downward) value changes. I think a crypto wallet app that optimized for this problem would be super valuable, e.g. making doing taxes of these transactions seamless, and suggesting paying using a currency that is optimal for taxes (e.g. realizing a loss if that is possible, because then your purchase would come with a tax credit.) There are also efforts by legislators to enable de minimis exemptions for crypto transactions (taxes waived if the transaction size is sufficiently small)
you completely ignored the question lol

we know that you know, and that we know, but the comment was saying that most people don't.
> power back to the states, and in turn the people

That sounds quite Stalinist. The people are not the state.

> So a state and its people would have the power to decide on something like abortion rather than a single centralized leviathan-authority.

Right, so your federal government is a centralised Hobbesian leviathan, but state government is not? How is state government not centralised? It's just centralised at a different level.

You know what would not be centralised? Allowing individuals bodily autonomy. Let them decide whether they want an abortion, not have them be forced to carry foetuses to term against their will.
The answer is to to be straight up and make it clear that you can't answer that specific question in that instance because of how the real world works... but reassure people that you will be as straightforward and fair as you can be when you can answer.
It’s a unique move to non-ironically point out btc has value because tulips once had value, aka one of the most notorious bubbles of all time. Most people pointing to the tulip bubble comparing Bitcoin are giving an example of why Bitcoin is misguided. This is the first time I’ve seen someone say Bitcoin is like tulips thus it has value.
I do what I can. I donate to principled and pragmatic political campaigns, I vote, and I encourage others to do the same. I've just heard too much doom and gloom that never turns out as bad in practice as I've been led to believe. c'est la vie. One must cultivate one's own garden.
Or the DEA, CIA, NSA and other criminal cabals.
> revenue now is just a $2bn

"only" $2bn ? this is bizarre to see discussed without question
> But in a real production application with heavy scale, you need a lot of low-level control over precisely how state is managed.

Very much this. "State is managed automatically!" can very quickly become "this frequent operation is automatically doing a huge amount of DB work which should actually be deferred until later"
This isn't some kind of new legislative process. This has literally been the law of the land since the constitution where it's described.

And I'm sorry but I'm going to reject the opinion column of a small newspaper as a source.

You're right in that Fascism is not just composed of single dictators but you are confusing the Rule of Law with beaucracy. Having a high court and requiring laws to be explicit is not "Fascism", it is literally the basis of the legal system.
Epic is nowhere to be seen in the mobile space though.
It doesn't have to be that way. The USA has more than enough energy reserves, however international lobbying and bribery ensures foreign influence.
Simulation of Veritasium's solution to the impossible riddle
Here's the interesting thing about tulips: after the bubble popped, bulbs recovered to a stable and profitable price, and the Dutch have been exporting them in great numbers ever since. Tulip mania was a resounding success and an enduring source of wealth for the Netherlands.

No direct analogy intended but it's an important historical fact. A lot of money was made on the South Seas as well.
It could have all of those things, however, by act of Congress and/or constitutional amendment.
This analogy is a bit of a stretch I know, but I think they're compatible. A leader's job in war and in a company is to ensure the morale of their soldiers. You may be in a losing situation, but if you're honest, you're guaranteed to lose. If people think there's still a fighting chance, the company may yet succeed.

Of course, there are better ways than outright saying no, but complete honesty is not the solution always.
Why is Windows on ARM not thriving today?
How do you see the Supreme Court as being more democratically responsible than the administrative personel of the executive branch?

To me, it seems clear that the "administrative state" is overseen by the president, who can overrule them and fire individual people, and the president is elected by the people every four years, and that makes the executive branch more democratically responsible than the supreme court, which is not elected by the people, and who serve for life with no democratic accountability.

But I'm open to hearing your argument for how the supreme court is more democratically responsible than the offices of the executive branch! Maybe we don't mean the same thing by "democratically responsible".
"We know Congress is too deadlocked to be effective."

In areas where there's no consensus, sure. Congress is very effective when the parties align. This is government working as intended.

Not being able to bulldoze opposition is very different from existential destruction, or "becoming a non-entity" as was written above.

The government only taking actions supported by a mandate from the people is an ideal result.
Did any of these have moving parts?
Godot is nowhere, it's not used by anything major. It's not even a drop in the ocean.
NoEstimates (2015)
It is generally assumed that companies pull this shit. If I get fired the government pays me my salary for a year while I'm looking for another job.

I don't really blame corporations, the moment that they admit weakness is when the hyenas show up.
Have you read the dissent? it has clear legal answers to the questions being asked, including how the supreme court is ruling against non-existent policy as a political statement. The EPA guidance quoted exists because the EPA decided to move in a different direction before ever applying the Clean Power Plan.

How does issuing preemptive and overly broad rulings against regulatory action that doesn't exist align with SCOTUS "just doing their job" as many people are asserting?
Drew DeVault created this[1] to help people start using git send-email. I'm not sure if it works for the purpose of contributing to your project, but it may save you from having to explain the same thing repeatedly :)

[1] https://git-send-email.io/
No, I was a kid.
I'm assuming that somehow coinbase is correlating it to wallets somehow, and tht might be the valuable part
I’ve never been at a company where users could get the right permissions to use it, unfortunately
I have a massive Cheatsheet for most languages and many packages-
https://github.com/jsfuentes/Code-Cheatsheet

Also hosted on gitbooks: https://openai.gitbook.io/code-cheatsheets/
You can view a bit of their analysis here: https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/checking-our-work/presi...

Their seems to be a systemetic bias for them to be underconfident. That is to say, when they a result is likly (>50%) to happen, they underestimate how likely. Conversly, when they think an event is less likely (<50%), they overestimate its chances. Still, more likely events tended to occur more often than less likely events.

Correcting for this systematic error would mean they should have given Clinton an even higher chance.
> In a piercing recent essay that's well worth your time, Simon Evans writes about watching his daughter become an adult, and also about the death of a close friend...

Yes, definitely worth reading. Better than the original article IMO.
The link should be changed to https://theintercept.com/2022/06/29/crypto-coinbase-tracer-i.... Current Coindesk article is a poor rehash of the Intercept article, which is a lot more clear. The key question remains unanswered, but the original article at least points that out:

> The contract also provides, provocatively, “Historical geo tracking data,” though it’s unclear what exactly this data consists of or from where it’s sourced.

No idea how geo tracking data can be “fully sourced from online, publicly available data”.
This is really hard to answer without knowing more about the room you want to use it in, how much you intend to move while speaking, whether it also has to be able to record other people present in the room or just your voice, and, most importantly, how much you're willing to pay for it.

You want it to be off camera. This means that a dynamic broadcast microphone is not a good choice. However, a condenser microphone might still work. They do pick up a lot of room noise, though.

For your requirements (which you might want to reconsider), the usual choices would be:

- A shotgun mic directed at your mouth from outside the camera. For example, the Sennheiser MKH 416 is often used ($800-$1000), the Rode NTG5 would be a cheaper but still expensive option.

- A hidden or hard to spot Lavalier microphone. These are the little microphones you see on TV that are clipped to the clothes. Good ones are rather expensive, too.

That being said, if it is for Skype calls, then I wouldn't recommend spending more than about $100-$150 on a mic, and I'd recommend either a dynamic microphone or a condenser microphone and getting as close to it as possible. I used a Rode M3 outside the camera angle for a long time and it had quite good quality, although spoken voice is certainly not it's primary use.

If you want higher quality, then you really need to say more about the purpose, your budget, and the room situation. Some reporters used to literally speak their voiceovers inside a closet full of clothes, which makes for excellent echo cancellation. Even a very cheap microphone can sound excellent without background noise and without room reverb (or in a room with good natural reverb).

Since you ask "best sounding" by the way: At a certain level this also depends a lot on your voice. The same mic can flatter one speaker's voice and make another speaker's voice sound ugly.

Final advice: Microphones are similar to headphones. Below $80 most of the stuff is crap. There are a few exceptions but be careful. Then there is a mid category between $100 to $300 that is a sort of sweet spot for non-professional users, and above that prices go up indefinitely. Once you know your price range and requirements, you can find some more affordable and even better alternatives to the well-known brands and choices with a bit of research, but you generally get what you pay for.
Sounds like that Intel/AMD will need to move toward integrating RAM into the CPU package.
Then we can’t do anything. Personally I don’t think never doing anything is a path to success.
To be fair, the states are effectively countries that have joined a federation (similar to the EU). The power is supposed to be primarily at the local level, the federations primary goal is collective bargaining and protection.

Pollution may make sense to regular here, but the states / federation needs to have a large majority agree (>60%). You can't have an unelected group of bureaucrats from the EPA dictating that a large number of states can't make money, for instance.
Isn’t SQL the language of state keeping?