skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
How these would actually work in real life? AI + data seems a data scientist job, not really something a virtual assistant could do. For meals & shopping list it would need physical access to your fridge no? For bills and paperwork also physical access is needed, right?
Heh Heh Heh. You also need to add the matching 310S sub (https://jblpro.com/products/lsr310s) for things to sound "right". :)

They're engineered to work together, and while you _can_ go without the sub for a while... it's a shit setup and only useful in the short term.

Wouldn't want to be doing production stuff (or even end user setup) without the sub. ;)
> Headlines about Supreme Court cases are almost uniformly misleading, because they suggest the Court is making decisions on policy issues rather than legal issues.

I agree with this completely, but it doesn't help when justices begin their opinion / concurrence / dissent with a long policy discussion before talking about the legal questions. That's been the case in several of the recent decisions.
While hummingbirds are amazing, I think we will have to model out systems more closely to birds of prey. Most birds can’t carry much extra weight, until you get to raptors and some sea birds.

We would be after something that can carry a payload such as a salmon, a coconut, or a human.
The main implication here is that the policy making decision tree needs to change.

Whereas before it was:

Do we have the political will to enact this from sea to shining sea via Federal legislation?
-> YES/NO
-> Can we enact this from sea to shining sea via fiat through an existing administrative agency?
-> YES/NO
-> Can we enact this from sea to shining sea via the SCOTUS?
-> YES/NO
-> Can we enact this policy gradually via the States?
-> YES/NO

Now it is:

Do we have the political will to enact this policy from sea to shining sea via Federal legislation?
-> YES/NO
-> Can we enact this policy gradually via the States?
-> YES/NO

The States themselves don't have the "malapportionment" problem, and insofar as Congress does, it's because the system was always set up for change to occur from the bottom-up, not the top-down. The EU refers to this as subsidiarity [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subsidiarity_(European_Union)]. Congress is structured in exactly the same way as the EU, as well as other federations like Australia and Switzerland.
I appreciate you probably aren't a fan of a skeptic documenting your project, but the rest of us would appreciate it.
Roe doesn't claim bodily autonomy, nor have I in this comments thread. Where are you getting that idea?
Did anyone else laugh out loud after scrolling down the page a bit and seeing the actual device, which is a literal collar? The appearance of the device itself evokes hilarity. Who would willingly put that onto themselves? If your job requires you to attend meetings on-camera, what might your coworkers think if you wore such a device?
Bethesda/Microsoft bought them and took it off the licensing market, but it also seems questionable to me if it had a future there anyway, because they seemed to have gone all-in on large but totally static environments with Rage, something which has not changed with Doom. That's not something that really works for many games.

Looking at the family chart you can see that the last version that was widely licensed was idTech 3 - from 1999: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/85/Quake_-_...
In 2002-2004-ish, weren't we still in the Nokia phone days. This is even before the Motorola Razr!
> you really just have to eat healthier foods

I'll give the article credit for mentioning processed foods, but otherwise, many people and even experts disagree on what makes a food healthy. Telling people to just not "eat crap" and to cut out processed and fried foods is barely specific enough to be useful.

The utility of eating a specific diet is that it actually identifies what foods should be avoided and why. If uneducated individuals just "eat healthy", they are likely to do things that either won't work or will backfire in the long run.

> A lot of people think a diet is this magical thing that makes it easy for you

Yes, because that's what an appropriate diet tends to do. When you eat a diet that doesn't overly engage the Randle cycle or raise insulin, losing body fat usually follows whether one counts their calories or not. If someone is overweight and they eat a low insulinogenic diet, and their food is satiating, both their eating frequency and their biology is likely to shift to not hold on to so much body fat anymore. The only thing that's not easy about such a diet is not being tempted by all the common foods that interfere with the metabolism.

> you really just have to eat healthier foods

That means very little. What does that mean? Eating Raisin Bran? Eating lots of leaves? Cutting out red meat? Eating lots of fruit?

> move around in general

Moving around can certainly help, but for weight loss and maintenance, it's far more efficient to eat an appropriate fuel substrate and to not eat excessively. You could burn 235 calories climbing the Empire State building for 30 minutes, or you could simply not eat those 235 calories and do something more interesting or productive with that time.

This isn't to say that there aren't possible cardiovascular benefits from exercise, but it's not as efficient for fat burning as people think. For most of that 30 minutes the human body will be burning primarily glucose, so unless one is fasted they won't be shredding fat from the second they start climbing those stairs.

> the truth is that it ultimately comes down to choosing foods that are good for you

Again, any individual is unlikely to actually know what that means or come to a consensus with the next person on what that means. "eat healthy" means nothing.

> rather than taking diet pills

Yeah, they probably shouldn't do that.

> or doing some extreme diet like keto or carnivore

Neither of those are particularly "extreme" except that they eliminate many of the things that cause the human body to keep holding on to fat. As it turns out, they're both low-insulin diets, and the latter diet is the one that is most species-appropriate out of just about any other diet.

No one has to eat keto or carnivore, but to suggest people shouldn't eat either form of diet is based on... what, exactly?

> And that can be _hard_, because eating good food and being lazy are very easy to do and can be quite enjoyable.

I agree. Eating good food is easy and enjoyable once one breaks past the standard advice of "eat healthy."
I don't have much to contribute besides to say that I also run Arch and I also would love to use a high-quality throat mike. My use case is mostly for comms while riding eBikes, not office work. I have a Blue Snowball that I use for voice chat in my quiet, personal home office.
I've commented elsewhere on the reasons why the Supreme Court might rule the way they did. If you're sincerely curious, feel free to look at my other comments.

Here, I'll just observe that you're doing it again: you're projecting the worst possible motive on someone else's decision without giving due consideration to why else they might believe differently than you.
The Case for a Next-Generation AI Developer Platform
VCs love _technical_ risk. Outside of the very unusual circumstances of the Zero to One capital-funded-monopoly-theory era, they have considered _business_ risk quite toxic.
I love bone conduction headphone. I am currently using the Aftershokz Opencomm. The good thing is that they don't obstruct your ears, and you maintain full awareness of the outside world. Great when you are on the streets.

If that't not what you want, and when you are working from home, it is usually the case, then bone conduction headphones are not for you. When working from home, I am using a more traditional headset (Sennheiser Game One), which has much better sound quality.

For the microphone, I use the built-in headset mic, which is acceptable but not great. Best result I have heard on the receiving end is with a dynamic microphone, namely the Shure SM58, which is by far the most popular microphone for live vocals.

Static mics are great in a studio, but most people don't have studios. Dynamic mics do a great job at rejecting background noise, that's why they are so popular in live performances, and that's why they are also great in a noisy room. One logical constraint that goes with it is that you need to put it very close to your mouth, if you are doing video calls, you can't have it out of the frame, you will look like a rock singer ;)
Look, here's two recordings, spur of the moment, just sitting at a table.

The first is taken on an iPhone in Voice Memos with the built-in mic, as a reference.

The second is taken on the same iPhone in Voice Memos, using a Jabra headset w/ boom over bluetooth.

http://sndup.net/f86h

http://sndup.net/qpw9

(The voice quality of the headset is better when the background is quiet)
Could you point out where do you see such wrong usage here?
What about websites that won't even render static text when javascript is disabled. For example, any website that references sinclairstoryline for javascript will not render anything at all until you give permission to run scripts from both the website and that external host.

If I'm just reading static text on a web page, theres'a absolutely no reason why I should need javascript to just read it.
If the authorization of the EPA was to "regulate the environment" then there is nothing they couldn't do.

The EPA was largely create to regulate pollutants based on laws written in the 1950s and 60s. It's not at all clear that the original lawmakers would consider carbon a pollutant -- it's something you and I are exhaling right at this moment.

So saying that the EPA needs authorization to regulate emissions that can cause climate change seems reasonable to me.
It's surveillance to the extent any ID system is surveillance.

This is a digital form of all the IDs you get from the state already.

There are genuine concerns about the scale at which digital IDs can potentially be exploited and/or the scale of monitoring this can enable, but in functional societies and governments you can build laws and systems to mitigate such issues.

The alternative are low quality ad hoc systems that offer convenience, but have no incentive for privacy and/or security.

For example, consider the massive Experian hack in the US. A credit score is basically required if you want to be a functioning member of American society. And yet they barely got a slap on the wrist and continue with their pathetically poor security practices. And it's not like they (or any US entity, for that matter) will not make their data available to the government.

In fact, with a government controlled DB the voters can have far more say on what the govt can do with that data, as opposed to Apple or Google owning that data (which is what's happenign in the US with Apple providing digital ID for states, and I'm sure Google will get into that as well), which becomes their private data and as a member of society you have no say on what can be done with that.
Congress has to be explicit with what powers they delegate. They can’t just say “do whatever you want to fix this problem”. Neither does it say that in the law. It’s not the job of SCOTUS to give you the outcome you want. It’s to rule on what the law does say and is constitutionally acceptable.
There seems to be a lot of versions, I suppose that she is not the first to read her (or his) own situation into the story and change it accordingly.
Nim is not a "script style language". By default it compiles to C, and the generated C sources are then compiled with gcc or clang, etc.

As it says on nim-lang.org, "Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language".
The tether is there to supply power and hold it down. Lifters require a power to weight ratio greater than one, which probably isn't possible with an on-board power supply. This MIT plane integrates the power supply and uses wing lift to reduce the required power, just as all planes do, and as the ionic propulsion planes did before (as others have linked to).

This is just the MIT press department embarrassing themselves again, or perhaps proving that sensationalism is a required part of science/funding these days.
I think that's why he's charging extra. If you are making a reasonable living from your bootstrapped SaaS, you'll probably keep at it.
How to call Rust functions in JavaScript with `wasmbuild`
This is how I work as well, but Sublime is my preferred editor. Same on both Windows and MacOS. Autosaves everything. Super fast.
All that will probably converge to science one day, but certainly for now they are mystics.
Totally agree. For example, I have 10,000 SOL (Solana tokens) that I regularly screenshot and show off. It's all on devnet, though, so it's free and worthless.

It's the web3 version - in web 2 I'd be instagramming my knockoff Rolex I bought in Tijuana
Tell this to the states passing anti-abortion legislation. They seem to view it as a binary. At a minimum, the burden of proof for exceptions is high with the penalties being life in prison in more than a few states.
Run `nim -v`, if it's not in debug mode you should see "active boot switches: -d:release".
> This case concerns whether the EPA can use its power to impose control technologies on power plants, to force the industry to use a particular mix of power generation sources (solar, gas, etc.).

Dissenting opinion quotes the following, which to me (and at least one supreme court judge) does not seem to limit this power:

> “the degree of emission limitation achievable through the application of the best system of emission reduction which (taking into account the cost of achieving such reduction and any nonair quality health and environmental impact and energy requirements) the [EPA] Administrator determines has been adequately demonstrated.” §7411(a)(1).
> But that's just it: bad choices in the social layer become nearly irrevocable once a self-interested, powerful elite emerges. The bad choices put them on top and they will do anything to stay there.

I would argue that this trait is not unique to blockchain systems -- in fact, if you presented this argument without context, I doubt many readers would put blockchain in the top 5 potential referents. See: economic systems, political power struggles, social structures, etc.
They are not. Even if we assume congress wasn't a complete gridlocked mess, they simply do not have the bandwidth. There 535 Members of Congress and they work less than 200 days a year in a typical session.

How many regulatory bodies are there that need rules passed? I can think of the FAA, FTC, EPA, FDA, USDA, and the NRC just off the top of my head. A quick google search shows there are 19 of these rule making agencies. Even with a wide distribution of rule making authority, these agencies struggle to keep up with our rapidly evolving world.

Forcing congress to hear and make a decision on every single regulation these agencies propose would be a bottleneck that brings this country to it's knees.
Do we know if openwrt is vulnerable and needs updating?
Does this program exist on a national scale, does it affect millions of people? If not, the comparison is absurd.
It sounds similar to kaffir which is a derogatory term used in the Middle East for people who don’t practice a certain religion. It is also used in South Africa in a manner similar to the n-word in America.
Would love to see Fossil get wider adoption:

https://www.fossil-scm.org/

Single 6mb executable with a version control system, web server, bug database, forums, import/export/sync with git, repo browser, much saner CLI than git, etc. Been using it for 2+ years for all my projects and love it.
Congress members bring snowballs to the floor as evidence that climate change isn't real. Some of this behavior is due to personal beliefs, but there are other factors:

https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=E01

So due to the ignorance and corruption among conservative lawmakers regarding climate change and carbon emissions, congress has been in an ideological deadlock on the issue of climate initiatives. The EPA existing somewhat independent of that framework was a benefit.
I realize most people don't give a shit. PSG fans don't care that they are winning because of wealthy oil sheikhs they just want to win. The how is irrelevant. Outspending and destroying the opponent is too boring for me. You already know Haas will never be on the podium.
From Shakespeare's Henry V, circa 1599...

Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more, Or close the wall up with our English dead. Cry 'God for Harry, England, and Saint George! '

Res ipsa loquitor...
Can you provide examples where linear growth in resource consumption does not reflect on linear growth in clouds? So far all free tiers that I saw were trivial in cost savings and anything after free tier was pretty linear (or even big scales allowed to save something).
You're right, I wasn't careful enough typing.
To be fair, I'm on the Beta builds and while sometimes there are crashes, it's often fixed in the next beta release. And maybe i am just building something basic, but I've never had to fight the engine. And the asset store has provided me a lot of great resources.
Very nice. Found your first Mac shortcut immediately helpful.

I'm assuming you commit an Obsidian vault directly. Do you sweep for secrets before you commit? Your layout resembles my own, but I often dump keys / secrets into my vault "temporarily" and forget about removing them later.
Places where they aren’t required to enforce medieval, harmful policies that harm minority groups.
Rust 1.62.0
Blow isn’t inventing structs of arrays. It’s as you say a common gaming idiom and one he’s used before. What he was doing is trying to make it a first class citizen. Very few languages do anything for these. None of the language I use have iterator that work for this. You have to write your own bookkeeping logic every time.
"A different theory of legal review" which here means coming to a predetermined policy decision, and then inventing legal justification for it, no matter how flimsy.
Judges use outcomes to interpret the law all the time. There's nothing, on it's face, invalid about that approach. You may personally disagree with it, but then you'd have to justify why the rest of us should believe in a legal philosophy that's clearly going to degrade our quality of life by destroying the environment.
Ask HN: Can I see your digital notes?
Saw a thread about CheatSheet. I would love to see how others take notes and make it public. I’m trying to keep one and write (still struggling to be regular). The idea is to write notes that are personal/family but are OK to be open for others to get some inspiration.
Not offering subsidized healthcare is inhuman? What quality of life at work is inhuman?

I think it is inhuman to not offer a woman 1 year of parental leave to breastfeed and raise her baby.

Should I simply not attempt to operate a business in the US, because this benefit would make my payroll costs so high in my line of business, that my customers would opt to buy from my competitors at a lower price and my business would fail.

These are practical reasons that businesses cannot take on this responsibility. Easy for white collar programmers and government workers to take the high road. But there are many who have to compete with much smaller margins and volatile cash flows.

I want to give my employees a year of parental leave. I want them to have many more vacation days. I want them to not have to depend on their employer for healthcare and be able to shop around for different jobs easily. That is why I support political efforts to do all these things, but I cannot afford to enact it at my business because my customers would go to my competition. That is a perfectly valid reason to “blame the game” and not “blame the player”.
Passion votes count the same, sure. But impassioned voters advocate for their candidates and get their friends to vote. Lesser of two evils voters don't really care like that.

It's the whole reason startups go for natural marketing. Users that naturally come upon and love your product will proselyte it more and better than anyone else.
> If it is, as you claim, permissible to train the model (and allow users to generate code based on that model) on any code whatsoever and not be bound by any licensing terms, why did you choose to only train Copilot's model on FOSS? For example, why are your Microsoft Windows and Office codebases not in your training set?

This is my favorite question about Copilot ever.
If you look at the cli screencast, it appears to be using fly under the hood.
I wasn't surprised Trump won either, but then I followed 538's coverage closely which made clear that he wouldn't win the popular vote, but could well win the presidency.
Ok, changed from https://www.coindesk.com/business/2022/06/29/coinbase-is-rep.... Thanks!
Directly experienced this - having actual _profit_ makes it hard to encourage fantastical storytelling about how big the upside is. It's the company future equivalent of mark-to-market.

Revenue .. well, if you can get huge revenue with huge losses and convincingly demonstrate (mostly by spending) that more losses (= more capital) means more revenue can actually take you a long way. Almost all of the "unicorns" and "decacorns" embraced this model - lose $2-5 per $ of revenue but able to demonstrate almost unlimited market. Most of those companies can never, ever be profitable entities.
Why is this so confusing?

Then pass a law.

I hope every coal plant on earth goes away forever. I hate coal plants. Get rid of them and PASS A LAW restricting their use.
The one I built when I was a kid didn't. I don't know of any designs that do.
I made my own with search and autocomplete, it works for me and I have it on GitHub, but it's pretty specific to my workflow and there are so many different options in this thread (a lot of which are probably better).

I also liked the idea here to prefix all your scripts https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31846902 and would personally recommend using fish or zsh with the improvements from ohmyzsh for autocomplete and hints.
So the only downside to local repo's is that a central site acts as a point of redundancy. Other than that I totally agree.
You have absolutely zero evidence whatsoever to support this claim, and as such you should not make it.

This is how disinformation is spread; not through some conspiratorial plot to confuse, but from fear, uncertainty, and doubt.
ML algorithm predicts crime a week in advance
The Complete Wermo's Guide to Huttese
I think 62-21's creation of broad industry classifications expanded rates of depreciation for a wide variety of assets, though; I'm pretty sure that was re-structured in the 80's, not sure if it was part of the 1986 Tax regulations but likely around that time.
Yes, хуй can also be used with в instead of на, so the ‘on’ is better than ‘to’. However, we could combine the two to be even more accurate and imply the motion: ‘go onto dick’. We can also improve the translation by adding an article: ‘go onto a dick’.

Alternatively, we can make a slightly more idiomatic translation by fiddling a bit with the verb: “get on a dick” is my favourite version of this, conveying the meaning well without sacrificing too much accuracy.
The question is whether the precedents established in these cases will be respected and "swing both ways" in practice as they do on paper, or whether the SC will conveniently discover new legal principles to avoid them when, say, the legality of NSA's programs eventually comes up.
So 9 unelected lifetime appointees should be able to dictate laws, but 538 democratically elected representatives that change every 2 years based in the will of the people shouldn’t?

Huh.
We need to talk about the next data build tool – Knit
Project seems to be using a weird license, therefore I'm out.