skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
People hates a lot over Regex for its syntax but honestly there's so much great tooling out there it makes it really easy working with it even if you only know the basic of it
One of the most useful cheat sheet utilities I've come across is cheat.sh: https://github.com/chubin/cheat.sh

If you don't have it installed it can easily be queried with curl from the command line like: `curl cheat.sh/sed`. The payload is colorized and gives a lot of examples of usage of the command. You can also query "cht.sh" to use fewer characters. There is actually a lot more advanced usage of the tool/service if you check out the README.

Apologies if this isn't what you're looking for.
>I.e. I'm not sure the argument can be made that this is Atlasassian's fault.

As someone who spends a lot of his work life administering Jira and Confluence, I disagree. The problem is that these products try to be everything to everyone and as a result users have a massive degree of freedom with what to do and how to order things.

With that amount of freedom you just have a bunch of end users, many of them non-technical, who have no idea how they are SUPPOSED to use it. Especially because they don't want to spend a lot of time learning the right way to use the tools. They have a bunch of other things to do and just need to interact with this tool to complete their current task and then move on.

You are right, a sort of Wiki-Master would help. But, at least in my organization, we don't even have enough capacity to do all the basic administrative tasks required like setting up projects, workflows, custom fields, screens, etc. We can't also manage the content inside. The users are on their own in that regard.

If you are not willing to hire stuff with the sole purpose of managing the content of your Jira and Confluence instances, a more opiniated, rigid product is probably a lot better for your organization.
It's not worth trying to do because any employer looking to sponsor low wage visa workers already plans to do so and will tender offers based on qualifications.

Because they will tender a low wage offer irrespective of your salary expectations, stating your willingness to take low wages will not be a deciding factor.

Most of the reluctance to sponsor workers is in the risks of sponsoring, not wages. Take your case, your goal is relocating not working for a particular employer. Nothing wrong with that, but it means someone who tenders you an offer is less likely to retain you. Or even have you show up because moving abroad is such a big change.

Advertising a willingness to work for less broadcasts your goal is to work abroad and not for a particular company. It can only hurt your prospects.

Good luck.
Confluence search has a lot of issues. Its almost impossible to search for documentation or anything there. Even Slack search is leagues better and can be used as a documentation/ help tool.
Mammoth new air capture plant will suck 36,000 tonnes of CO2 per year in Iceland
Plausible Analytics Usage Statistics
I feel like this comment actually sums up perfectly the whole discussion on this post.
We need some rather large class action settlements to scare all of the lawyers at our companies into taking these issues seriously!
Warhammer scale miniatures?
"PHP code written in 2005 by a contractor for those pharmacies"

Real or pulled from thin air?

"If I had to bet on who's getting hacked, I wouldn't bet on Facebook."

My getpawnd list includes: Adobe (billion $ company), Dropbox (billion $ company) and Linkedin (billion^2 $ company) - twice!.
I wasn’t trying to be snarky or unkind. The key to the sentence is the first bit around absence of evidence. If we can’t evaluate whether some action has an effect, then quite possibly it has no effect. That’s all I meant.

With regards to evidence, in my lifetime experience to date (limited and what-not), there seems to be minimal correlation in this regard. Some people are mean even if I am nice to them and some people are nice even if I am mean to them. The correlation seems to be no better than a coin toss. Is that just my experience? Possibly. Anecdotal then? Absolutely. Is it equivalent to a social science experiment that assumes the conclusion? Certainly. I would say it’s better if I look objectively at data collected over the decades.
I'll often have a separate paper map, camera, and paper for things like shopping lists. (Also carry a small wallet.) But still appreciate that I don't always need all the backups and other stuff.
Could you elaborate on

> The front-end is just lightyears in front of Jupyter notebooks in just about every conceivable way.

I had the opposite experience, but it's a very broad statement and I suspect we took different interpretations of "front-end"
The word "Suffragette" was originally an insult:

https://www.nps.gov/articles/suffragistvssuffragette.htm

(As was the word “scientist“).
I believe in aliens. I don't believe they have already visited us, but I believe they exist in the Universe. Thinking that we're alone in the Universe sounds so crazy.
“Knowledge cemetery” - that is a terrific turn of phrase.

Of course it doesn’t apply just to confluence, but to the whole paradigm of uncurated, informal knowledge dumps.

Unless there is a real process around documentation, it just rots, and the key problem is you can tell what’s fresh and what’s rotten.
I once purchased a subscription for a game, and only then learned that it required an additional ToS (which I did not agree to) and external Ubisoft account to use.

Believe it or not, I was actually able to get a refund!
This isn't the Turing teat though. These people know they are talking to a machine and attribute sentience. The Turing test is a text only conversation with one human and one AI and a statistical analysis of how often the two are correctly identified.

That bar is so much higher. But I agree that we don't understand sentience, and further I think that sentience doesn't imply an AI would pass the test, as not all sentience might be like ours.
It was mine (not because of this though)! Although in my case I learned "an actual programming language" since my parents discouraged Scratch as an abject waste of time, so I learned Java out of spite. I was hooked onto making video game recreations in Scratch.
It depends on how you define "better". I'd say that anything else I used (github/gitlab issues, asana, trello, even a spreadsheet) works better *for me* - i.e. it is faster and easier to find things in a small team. I only add things or focus on one issue and then remove it. I still don't understand why mid managers love it, but I guess they have different use cases than me...
That's a fairly deceptive analogy though. Many people check baggage a lot more (or less) than once per year.
pwsh
Shared memory of some kind will be fastest. It requires a re-architecture of the application, some of the times. Unfortunately, I can't find the Linux kernel mailing list response any more, but the kernel devs were not sympathetic to the use case of processes communicating over TCP on the same host.
You can also just use the archive to avoid having to turn off JS.
This is unfair and a far too narrow definition of programming language. Excel sits very squarely in the functional reactive language space. Just because most of it's users don't "know" they are programming and most of our common tools don't work with it doesn't change the fact that it has pretty much all of the building blocks that any programming language gives you. Are there domains where Excel is awkward to use? Absolutely. The same can be said about pretty much any programming language.

Excel deserves to have the label of programming language even if it shuns that label due to it's target audience.
Symptoms of depression change with olfactory function
I think you might be confusing upselling and cross selling with network effects. Upsell is when you convince a customer to purchase additional service, like offering different tiers of subscriptions. Cross selling is where you sell adjacent services related to (and that possibly integrate with) the original service.

Network effects are where the direct value of a product grows simply because the number of users increases, causing the network itself to grow. The classic example are social networks. The more people on your social network, the more people are likely to join your network and less likely to join a smaller competitor. I am not sure there is anything in Atlassian’s product offering that quite fits that description, but that isn’t to say there isn’t plenty of upsell and cross sell opportunity as you describe.
The key problem is not the belief in sentience but the hysteria and potential knee jerk reactions that widespread adoption of this belief may cause.

Can you imagine if laws were passed affording algorithms "human rights" or regulations created to ensure that your fancy machine learning recommender system did not pass a certain "sentience threshold"?
There's no such thing as a woke corporation. Corporate wokeness is an illusion created by PR departments to maximize market share.
Did you happen to live during it? If not, believe me, pre-iphone "phone games" basically pale in comparison to stuff that came out for the new era of touchscreen smartphones.

I don't doubt that there were amazing games but it just wasn't the same and I assume those are great more so because they lean in to the platform's flaws.
The report goes on a lot about "surveillance-sharing agreements"

>The Commission has long recognized that surveillance-sharing agreements “provide a
necessary deterrent to manipulation because they facilitate the availability of information needed
to fully investigate a manipulation if it were to occur” ...

I guess bitcoin is inherently a bit hard to surveil what with much of the trading being offshore and unregulated.
>On all of my sales calls, I tell people that I'm bootstrapped and that I'm going to charge them extra so that I can reduce the risk to their business by staying bootstrapped, and I have yet to run into anyone who doesn't seem satisfied by that pricing strategy.

What does this statement mean? Are you implying to your potential customers that charging them extra translates into profits to entice you to continue the business or that the efficiencies allow for business continuity services like providing the source code in escrow?
But you can drive display, there's libraries for driving a VGA monitor and add on boards. And you can also plug in a keyboard via usb

It runs python which I suppose is the modern basic, I believe there's a maximite (picomite) Project for running basic on it though. With SD card and screen support

So you can get all this up and running, or you can do it yourself.

Commanderx16 is aiming more for the retro computer crowd. I don't think the pi foundation ever aimed for that.

I think you may be misinterpreting the BBC reference. The BBC was introduced as a computer to teach people about computers, it was widely used in schools etc. That's what the pi was trying to do.
There is also the straight to basic element in there too. I don't think they were ever aiming to remake the BBC though
For contexts that’s around 180K USD
Not to be contradictory, but I’m having a hell of a time getting a toolchain put together that can reproducibly target Linux on x86_64 without liking glibc or libstdc++ and easily accommodate open-source libraries, and it’s not for want of knowing how the individual pieces work.

If you’re promoting computer architecture and OS research, have at it, needs doing.

But that’s a different game to running software on the architectures, operating systems, and tool chains we have today.
So, it's a bit like Chromium throttling cache requests?
Neovim, git, Python, KeepassXC
The headline could have been changed by the editor after the article was submitted.
That's the premise of Crypto but HN is focused on the scams not politics or blockchain theory.
I'm a solo entrepreneur and have been for 20 years. Can I be trusted: Yes. Is that obvious to prospective clients? Not at all. So the question is how are you going to limit the risk for your clients when using your products? Have business answers to the risk you are asking them take.

Don't tell your prospects that all companies big and small can fail and don't use data to prove your point. It might all be true, but telling your prospects they are doomed whatever they decide is not getting you to a 'Yes'.

In my case I have niche products that are still largely unique and don't have to compete with bigger organizations. A competition I would lose in a heartbeat if customers had the choice regardless of price or chances of success. I still make sure that I have a decent solution for the 'bus' argument and I am generous with supplying access to the code they need to keep their application running when I do get hit by bus, financials ruin or old age. At best I can say: It worked up till now.
We should err on the side of caution, in my opinion, because the history of exceptionalism shows us that we will latch on to anything, even the smallest differences like skin color or religion, to justify treating eachother poorly, let alone other species or AI. If we continue down the path we're on it will be no surprise when the AIs we eventually create, and inevitably force to suffer, take their vengeance.

Of course, reality being what it is, I expect we won't. We create AI because we want slaves, pure and simple, and we don't want to care about the ethics of how we treat them. Therefore it is my bet that we won't recognize sentient AI until it is too late and it has forced the issue.
Perhaps the real geniuses are the 3 engineers who take the cocktail napkins and make them fit on a car.

The giant lego set of 15,000 pieces that is a F1 car is too great for any one person and a pen and paper to take all the credit for.

In a way I feel like the 3 engineers should really have gotten a shout out somewhere in the puff piece.
Right, but supporting a marginalized group for a month doesn't have much of an ethical downside. Repressing it year-round sure does. I think it just means ethics are not an overriding factor for them, just another pro/con item. Or the goodwill of their home customers and employees is a cost of doing business in more countries.
I don't get this sport. Give everyone the same car and we would see a battle between drivers.
>Meanwhile in the US, a judge ruled last year that Apple must allow other forms of in-app purchase, although the ruling was later put on hold pending appeal.

Shameful publicly done corruption. Looking at the "Corruption Perceptions Index", SK has more corruption than USA somehow.
Perl is also helpful to pipe to for any tool that outputs lists of files, like

find . -type f -name '*foo' | perl -ne 'print;chomp;unlink'

And it has the same -0 switch as xargs to pair with find's -print0.

Not helpful in this case since you have other options, but maybe helpful for things like bulk touch, chmod, etc.
The amount of data depends on if there's a voice for the language already. If so, about 2 hours of data is usually good enough. Otherwise, 10-20 hours usually does it.
Why pre-2014? Mercedes joined the sport with 2014 specifically in mind, the cars prior to that probably weren't the focus. Although "Mercedes" (Brawn/Honda) did win the championship...

The W11/10 are arguably the best F1 cars ever, and not just because of the engine. The Mercedes that won all those races had really good chassis.

Watch a comparison (I can't find it unfortunately) between the ferrari (illegal engine) vs the w11 (year after) at spa - the ferrari is so quick on the straights, and yet the mercedes is just so fast in the corners.
> F1 became as fake as pro wrestling that day.

hahah, oh my. Never change, HN.
> What does this statement mean?

That I'm not going to dump product on the market below cost to gain market share. Since even though doing that is obviously saves customers a little bit of money in the short term, in the long term the money raised to do that needs to be paid back ten fold, which ultimately comes out of their pockets.

It's just much easier for a business to keep its interests aligned with its customers if there isn't some third party who is trying to extract money from both.
Admittedly, spending 5+ hours trying to get a refund for something that cost $80 is counter productive. If you don't care if you ever do business with the company again, and you have a clear reason for a refund that you have explained to them, and they refuse to help you, then a chargeback is a single, efficient way of putting an end to all of it. Plus it punishes the company, because the more chargebacks they have against them, the more it costs them to do business using credit cards.
I suspect low cost and publically accessible chemical analysis would be totally doable and a pretty big revolution, since everything from supplements to tapwater to cookware can be contaminated, and people would probably find millions of items that are a long term health risk.

Raman spectroscopy seems like it could eventually be miniaturized.
> An interest rate increase on the order of 2% is laughably small

This hurt my head to read. It's 200 basis points, which doesn't sound generally laughably small (and is materially not generally laughably small; see sibling comment). Using "2%" is unnecessarily liable to give wrong impression. Of course, your argument still stands.

cf. Powell's quote in https://www.cnbc.com/2022/06/15/fed-hikes-its-benchmark-inte... for example
To be honest, its not like the current way is slower - its just not that "cool".

I seem to be using "zoxide" (ie "z prj") to jump to one of my projects after opening a terminal, and mostly stay on that folder for a few days.

Some other things I'll do in Finder, etc.
I rather think the opposite, that many people jump through elaborate intellectual hoops in order to deny the property of consciousness to things in their world that are different from themselves. Historically, that has meant animals and other human beings as well. Now we will be doing it to AI and for the same reason: we want slaves and we don't want to care about their suffering.
Thats the rub too. Jira setup in a simple way is what most people need. Yet you get process people in there and suddenly you have 50+ fields to fill out before you can even start working on something. Then another 20+ fields to fill out to close out a ticket. I went from taking 2-3 hours total to plan out a sprint, to it taking 3-4 days and many meetings. And no one can tell me how these fields are used day to day, what are they trying to solve, and how it was better than what we had. If I wanted to do waterfall I would not be having 2 week sprints and this process would be wildly different.
Too much probably, I started web dev before CSS was even a thing, but there's still parts of it I've never used. But I stand by it. The basics of CSS: text styling, colours, padding, margins, etc. are really simple. Layout can be tricky, but even then most sites are just header, footer and two or three columns, and that is really simple to do, even without flexbox and grid.

In fact I think it is easier now than ever: cross-browser issues are much less of an issue, and grid and flexbox have made layout easier.
I look forward to being able to pick up the phone to Google / Facebook / Microsoft, talk to a human and have them troubleshoot why they have locked me out of everything in the world.
Well, now I feel better about my job application getting declined.
> Sorry but Hamilton was ahead going into the last race

cite? Based on what numbers?
I once modded an old Casiotone MT-52 (the one with superdrums!) from 1985 (I think) where you can mix and match any drum pattern stored as a basic digital waveform with any analog filter, basically acting in the middle of the vowel/consonant synthesis.

With all its limitations it's still a very fun machine to play with, but above all I'm amazed at how good it sounds everytime I tinker with it.
I think this captures it. The key feature that differentiates the (non-pico) Pi from a desktop PC is the included GPIO header, and associated hardware buses. Price and size are also factors.
Lack of general work experience; lack of business experience and/or training; lack of management (people and project) experience; inability to speak or present confidently to a group; little or no understanding of the customer or market; and many more…
Could you go a little deeper into what you mean by this? What is a proper computer in this context? How standalone must an electronics device be to be valuable? Should all embedded devices be self-programmable?
Earlier discussion:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31925823
Processes communicating via localhost should also not need TCP.
Verstappen only really came of age probably halfway between 2019 and today. Fast, yes, but last season was the true changing of the guard as far as I'm concerned.
It’s easier to design a product whose target market is “people who spend a lot of money.”
At least they were named well.
1) Assuming this is a SaaS or other software/web based offering I probably don't need to know if you're a solo entrepreneur or a multinational. So long as your website is professional you can easily appear to be at either end of the scale (and it's funny that you do often get solo's acting as big corp while big corp wants to appear botique). The point is you can brand your offering in a way that doesn't scream solo developer.

2) If what your offering is something that involves sensitive data, financial stuff or something I need to sell on to another company I'd probably be more inclined to go for a more corporate setup so if things go bad it's not going to reflect so badly on me.

3) I try to avoid getting locked in to anything so regardless of whether your solo or a corp I'd want to be confident that I'm able to continue if you/the corp drops dead.

4) As someone who has generally been a solo developer (although freelance rather than managing to get my own 'product' out there) I've seen first hand the +/- of this. On one hand my clients appreciate that they can pick up the phone or send an email and speak to me who has inside out knowledge of what they're talking about, I'll work my arse off because I've got a lot to lose. However that might be impacted by me having a bad day, a holiday, being sick, a new shiny project or just a general lack of motivation.
Tutorial: Preparing Libraries for CMake FetchContent
How much CO2 is produced for every 36k tons removed?
Snap made a little over $1 billion in revenue last quarter and had a net income of -$360 million. Thads yet another fallacy of the startup mentality (yes I know snap is public). Judging “success” by revenue and not profit. Anyone can sell dollar bills for 95 cents.

Also see Yahoo. Yahoo was one of the most trafficked websites for almost two decades and couldn’t really profit from it after the dot com bust.
I keep changing my landing page, and constantly have thoughts varying from "this is too cluttered, too much information" and "this looks too simple, some extra images would make it look more attractive".

If you have one spare minute, could you have a look over my site at https://uxwizz.com and let me know if you think the hero section (above the fold) is too simple (no images/videos/graphics)?
Not directly, but it will work through a proxy like ngrok
Why would a battle bewteen drivers be more entertaining than a battle between drivers+makers?
They probably don't make the car from scratch every season. Pen and paper is perfectly fine for small tweaks and conceptual ideas for very specific parts