skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Oh, I agree it's juvenile. But it's not a reason to fire someone. Its also juvenile to drive drunk (this has the potential of resulting in injury and death of others). It's juvenile to curse someone out.

This is not a good reason to fire someone. If we were to trawl TikTok, we would come up with a good amount of people to fire from many companies, if we go by this criterion.

Where is the "restorative justice" people in these circles usually clamor for?

Where is HR? Aren't they supposed to correct behavior when it veers?
Why is it a problem with TikTok, but not for Facebook? The boogieman of the PRC is less scary than Zuck imo.
I don't think it's fair to frame this as specific to GitHub, or even as a thing to wring hands over.

New devs - especially those coming from bootcamps (I say this without judgement) - mostly start with practical skills. Industry-standard ways to just get things done. That's how you get a job, that's how you get off the ground. This goes beyond source-control; languages/frameworks, tooling, etc. You enter the territory - with your finite bandwidth for learning - where it's most immediately useful. And then over the years you move out from there, incorporating more and more nuance and detail and auxiliary knowledge.

There's no need for moral panic. "Where it's most useful to start" has shifted, sure. But that's natural; I don't think it's a new phenomenon or in a fundamentally worse place than before. GitHub is a higher-level tool that makes you dramatically more productive than raw git on its own. The details will be filled in as they work their first job.
if you're worried about copilot: isn't the problem is that copyright law (apparently) allows them to do it?

if you move everything to gitlab/self-hosted there's nothing stopping them spending 5 minutes querying the bing index and feeding it every repo they find
> Then tell the EPA to start lobbying the NRC to start building new nuclear plants

No, stopping the coal plants is the end goal. Whether it's by saving energy or building alternative sources like solar/hydro/nuclear is irrelevant to the EPA's goal (protecting the environment/mitigating climate change).

Innovation will not save us, the tools have been here for decades.

I agree this should be passed as a law.
Isn't the Russian blockade of Ukrainian exports of foodstuffs of a much higher impact? Are there even sanctions on "sanctions on fuel and petroleum derived fertilizers"? I was under the impression that nothing food related was sanctioned.
It’s valid to focus on China, because China is where lobbying efforts are best spent. A single huge government making a small change will “do” more than a small government making a small change.
This seems like selection bias. Is somebody who has "made it" going to continue striving every day to be the greatest in their field? Personally, I don't think so, which means anybody making 8 figures is by definition someone who will never feel like they "made it". The people who see a couple million as having finally attained success will have already phoned it in & dropped out, contented.

Indeed, I'd argue it's a little dangerous to declare you've "made it" too early, for this reason. Most of the world would consider a stable six figure job to be success. But many of those jobs are very competitive; if you let it go to your head & start to check out, will you still have that job in five years? Will you still be a success then?
As well as the “privileges and immunities” clause.

The whole point of these was to avoid unenumerated rights being completely unprotected. The current court seems to think only the 1st and 2nd amendment exist.
Can’t pass a law, too many climate change deniers in political positions.

We’ll have to find other mechanisms to force coal plants offline. Lots of tools available besides the EPA.
Yeah, he was on the dissenting side. But it was still 5-4.
There's no Discord yet, just GitHub issues. Here's an issue to track this request: https://github.com/jfilby/nexus/issues/14

I'll email you regarding what/how to help.
Find programming work by increasing luck surface area
Alluding to this, at what point can such a huge company say that we have technical debt and that we'll be focusing on refactoring and making the base solid instead of releasing new features?
During peak bubble, heists are common, I wonder if there is a deflationary event coming to collectibles in general. They've ballooned astronomically in the past few years and I wonder if its sustainable seeing that in auctions the buy or sell it to each other in order to increase the valuation in hopes that some billionaire will come and buy their rare super mario bros cartridge.

I don't know if you had the money and can't think of what to buy next, you end up collecting these insanely expensive nintendo cartridges that you don't even know will work.

The FPGA and CD emulator hardware that lets you run games off SD card seems to have put some liquidity suppression. However, there is a novelty to owning the complete game box, complete with mint condition manuals and covers, so there will always be demand for that.

Not a good spot for the owner to be in.
This gives me a vision of a "slotcket" thing with CPU and a bunch of RAM on it, like 128GB for today's CPUs. gang these up on your expensive bus for bigger systems, package them in ceramic blocks with fluid ports, and... oh that's what they're talking about for "HPC" now innit.

human manipulable components are too big for the interconnect and density we want now... and those are already too small for easy cooling.
I can't imagine how it wouldn't.
> If you want to make it illegal to run a coal plant because you feel like it’s your duty to force some pain on the citizenry for what you perceive as a higher calling: pass a law.

Nobody wants what you described. Global warming is literally killing people by the thousands every year now. Wars are coming, mass migrations and climate refugees. This is a crisis, it’s just not a localized one. And it doesn’t have to be painful. Building + running windmills, solar, even nuclear, those are all good jobs.

You might just as well frame it “if 19 states want to make the world suffer so a few corporations can profit and people don’t have to re-train”.
Just read the article which I linked previously.
investors also build a ton of multi family buildings. That the brrr dude in seattle
Not at all - I can buy a bitcoin now, and then sell it, having not mined it.

I choose not to. But other people do.

> Money has value because of the value of the economic transactions in which its conducted.

As the OP said, little pieces of paper have essentially no intrinsic value. But use it for transactions, and it has suddenly has a value forced on it. We've all seen zombie apocalypse films with cash blowing around in the street and the survivors ignoring it for good reason, no one _values_ it.

Bitcoin is the same, it's a bit of paper in the sense that it's just some numbers on disc somewhere with no _intrinsic_ value, yet as soon as it's a medium of exchange, _which it is_, it has value. There are transactions made in bitcoin.
Congress doesn't remotely have the bandwidth to explicitly write out and decide all the little rules it takes to regulate the country, even if they had a clue what they were doing in each case

It's pretty clearly designed to dismantle the federal regulatory apparatus
Interpreting how it would have been understood at the time is quite subjective; how do we interpret how the Founding Fathers would've considered semi-automatic rifles or Facebook to fall in First/Second Amendment jurisprudence, or how far you can push the General Welfare Clause? The Founding Fathers themselves often disagreed on such things.

> Do you have a better suggestion that’s less partisan and less prone to abuse?

I'm of the opinion that textualism, in actual practice, is a highly partisan and heavily abused concept intended to be a thin veil over "I rule the way I want". I prefer the concept of a living Constitution; per Jefferson:

> I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and constitutions, but laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths disclosed, and manners and opinions change with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also, and keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy, as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors.
No it isn't. Stop exaggerating.
Specifically, the Supreme Court took power from women and gave it “back” to the government
People buy growth stocks because they can sell them for more tomorrow, it's often a bit of greater-fool theory in play.

For the successful companies that do grow into a dividend company, they often have valuations that far outstrip their eventual settling location at some point in the trajectory.
Show HN: NativeBird – Ultralight promise extension compatible with Bluebird
great answer thanks
>Congress can fix everything that’s happened in the last few weeks via proper laws.

If you don't think they'll call any regulation (or enumeration of rights) they don't like unconstitutional, I don't know what to tell you.
>the very left biased BBC

Major "code smell" right here

> Right now, the corporate legacy media are working hard to paint the false narrative that the current conservative justices are extreme partisan hacks

Well they are, and I don't need "muh mainstream media" to tell me about it. I can draw that conclusion based on primary sources, i.e. the court opinions, the justices' own words and actions, etc.
I've worked with some Chinese developers and VueJS was common on the front-end. Every China-based project I saw used it.
But Congress hasn't disappeared now either and can easily s/may/must/. What's the problem?
Also, their customer support has largely been an afterthought and when you combine that with dark patterns, it makes for an awful user experience: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26808275&p=2#26809476
This is a wonderful post and I hope it gets more visibility. Really nailed it here.
I agree. So therefore I want us to fix the gridlock in the legislative branch so they can actually legislate. I think the members of Congress have mostly been captured by the political parties, almost automatically voting with their party line, representing their party more than their actual constituencies. If someone represents my state of Michigan, I believe they don't just represent the Democrats or Republicans who voted for them, but that they're supposed to represent all of the people in the state. When they vote along party lines, it says to me they prioritize their party affiliation over their regional one.
Do you not think there are limitations on the copyrights you claim? The courts certainly do!
Did you actually read the constitution end to end? It's not that big, and if you had you would have see that such things you propose aren't in line with the text
As Bertrand Russell said:

"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt."

The worse is that other stupid people see confidence as a signal of competence (and give confident people power), when it's actually a negative signal. Truly smart people are usually pretty humble.
You say that but the big coal areas of america giddily voted for the guy promising to bring coal and coal mining back
Recently found out about ClickUp. It's not quite as feature-rich as JIRA, but nowhere near as simplistic as Trello, and its fairly jank-free so I'm a fan.
People are only using the metrics that make them/their country look best. The USA is topping the chart in cumulative GHG emissions, which is objectively the cause of climate change (carbon stays in the atmosphere).
The "better Java" niche was hot during Java's stagnation era (starting 2006 and lasting for almost a decade). The JVM was considered a great runtime, with a stagnant language, and lots of newer languages competed in that niche.

Scala and Clojure, and later Kotlin and others benefited greatly from that niche. The problem for the "better Java" niche was that Java never had to be the best JVM language in order to beat its JVM-based competition in the market. When Java started moving again (Java 8 introduced anonymous functions) and when the release cadence accelerated to every 6 months on 2017, the "Java is stagnant" justification for using other JVM languages lost a lot of traction.

Clojure was never really a "better Java" -- it's a JVM-based Lisp with good Java interop. Scala never leaned too much on the "better Java" niche, and the community is increasingly consolidated around FP. Kotlin still has some "better Java" ambitions, but they also have the Android community at their back. Without Android you would have seen Kotlin trying harder to differentiate itself from Java (EDIT: Google and Kotlin tied the knot in 2017, when Java moved to 6-month release cycle; probably not a coincidence).

Fairly young languages can still see rapid growth -- see Go (1.0 in 2012) and Rust (1.0 in 2015). But you are much less likely to see new languages trying to go head-to-head with Java on the JVM these days.
One diagram, one page of understandable text. I, for one, would welcome such a return to sanity.
By the standards of the Soviet Union, both US political parties are extremely far right; by the standards of Pharaonic Egypt, they're incomprehensibly far left. Whose standards for center are you using? The objective standard? Are you sure that exists? Are you sure you're not just taking your own personal beliefs about what seems reasonable, declaring the middle of that the objectively correct center, and then getting angry when the real Overton Window isn't centered around that point? People act as if you should just be able to take the leftmost thing imaginable, the rightmost thing imaginable, draw a line between them, find the middle, and then get angry if both US parties are on the same side of that line. But maybe they have poor imaginations. The leftmost thing I can imagine is an insectoid hive-mind; the rightmost thing I can imagine is a rapidly expanding cloud of profit-maximizing nanobots. Are we sure that a line drawn exactly midway between those two things lands on Joe Biden? What if it lands on anarcho-capitalism? Does that mean every existing human is left-wing?

Taken as a relative claim, it at least could make sense. But relative to what?

Relative to the US? False; both parties usually get about half of the vote, suggesting one is to the right of the median American, and the other to their left. You can probably argue that the Republican Party’s structural advantages cause both parties to be a little to the right of where they’d be without them, or that Americans’ ignorance of party platforms means you can smuggle a few points in that are slightly more extreme than what they’d endorse, but it’s going to be a small effect.

- https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/against-there-are-two-...
> It's still very much an open question as to whether congress is allowed to abdicate its power of rule making to the executive branch. The constitution seems to imply that the answer is "no," but the past interpretations of it say "yes." Chevron is a younger precedent than Roe.

You say abdicate. Not true.

Congress is obviously empowered to delegate.

Please be specific. Who (written where?) thinks this is an open question? Please cite evidence of this.
Due to things like the electoral college, gerrymandering, vote suppression tactics, and senate representation to name just few, the US is not very democratic. Nor can these be fixed under current conditions because of the above list.
Oops, sorry, I always confuse the two. The correct link:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kefir
QBraid enables 6 quantum computers to be available on its platform
The qBraid SDK provides three main features to make quantum computing development easier. The first feature allows for “write-once-and-submit” functionality where tasks for a quantum computer written in the form of circuits can be sent to multiple quantum computers regardless of hardware architecture or cloud service provider. The second feature is a circuit transpiler with 40+ frontend circuit permutations among Amazon Braket SDK, as well as other services. The third feature manages all the quantum tasks sent to various providers for the user to retrieve results.
There's also a bit of "path not taken" - perhaps whatever choice wasn't made wouldn't have worked out great anyway, for various other reasons.
If you want airspace to be regulated, pass a law (cancel the FAA). If you want frequencies to be regulated, pass a law (cancel the FCC). If you want individual food and drugs to be regulated, pass a law (cancel the FDA). If you want cars to be regulated, ...
This is very much the opposite of calvinaball. The rules are in the constitution and that hasn't changed in quite a while.

EDIT: RE: no right to poop(sic) in the constitution

It's a list of things the government may not do, not a list of things you may do. Try reading it, it's very short. I would imagine the court would rule a law against that would violate the right to life.
It seems like a legal grey area because for the most part what CoPilot is doing seems like it should be a transformative use [1] and you don't need a license for that. But apparently sometimes CoPilot will spit out other people's code verbatim, so I wouldn't use it. Not worth the risk.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformative_use
Macos still uses the darwin kernel which is a bsd. Still ships 'terminal', default shell these days is zsh.
> There's not much democracy in the EU, and that's by design.

[citation needed]. Please don't just throw out wild claims without any proof. As far as I'm aware, every single element of the EU is democratically legitimized in one way or another. Do you have any evidence to the contrary?

> I'm only surprised they haven't got rid of the ability of countries to secede the union yet.

Why would they? If you don't want to be on our boat, feel free to sink on your own. We don't need the dead weight.
how exactly do you propose finding the political will necessary to amend it?
Employees should take the exact same attitude with their job. Your duty as an employee is to optimize your compensation ( However you define compensation it doesn't have to be just money).

Same thing with honesty. If the employer isn't going to give you advanced notice that you may be fired, you have no obligation to tell them that you are thinking about quitting.
>> Are any of them any better?

Not in my experience, at least not enough of an impact to make me really care. Azure DevOps was far worse in my experience, and many of the ones SW Devs promote can't roll up to the portfolio level which is where the strategic and purchasing decisions are made.
As it should. The EPA is not a branch of the government.
It’s interesting because our universities have been teaching everyone that there are no universal morals. So our diplomats have no idea how to defend ideals.
> let’s amend it!

Lol good luck with that. Zero chance 3/4 of the states agree on literally anything. The culture wars are in full swing, owning the other side is more important than being effective.
Are you kidding me? Gas goes up a few cents and suddenly most of the country thinks the free market is a total failure and wants Biden to singlehandedly be pumping out that crude.
The EU is just following the WEF agenda:

https://sociable.co/government-and-policy/wef-wto-global-dig...

Next step will be Digital Identity required to post online, and police action against wrongthink.

We've already seen Digital Identities used to unperson anyone who doesn't accept (arguably dangerous and experimental) medical treatments.
> Anyway, they have 8000 employees... they can always drastically downsize and refocus, the company will be around for a while.

They want to hire 17000 more people: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-04-07/atlassian...
There's an argument to be made there, but it's most certainly NOT "explicit". The 9th does say that there are other rights, that's pretty much its whole point. But it absolutely does not "explicitly" mention abortion or anything else.

You also ignored my example of 2A, or the current controversy (for which I haven't yet read the argument, but I assume that the 10th Amendment plays into it in exactly the same way you're arguing for the 9th).
Hello there,

Our main idea here was not only to build a predictive model that answers the question: “what sorts of people were more likely to survive?” but also to do it on encrypted data.

This was possible thanks to our Python package: Concrete-ML that aims to simplify the use of fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) for data scientists.

Feel free to ask the team if you have any questions about our work!
By this reasoning, women voting and eliminating the 3/5 coefficient for certain people are on "shaky constitutional ground."
Inhibition in the Amygdala Anxiety Circuitry
That's true in this case. It's not true in Bruen or Dobbs.
No, they ElimiNATED administrative rule making and private courts. This is far bigger than then EPA.
This is it. Values lead to attitudes when they are directed at an object. Beliefs and attitudes are emotionally biased and largely inform behavior. Unfortunately, beliefs don't have to be correct or even coherent with other beliefs to be strongly held.

A person may value a coal mine for a variety of reasons that are very emotionally hinged: economic, familial, etc. To change behavior values and attitudes have to change. That's exceptionally difficult when the competing values, like climate, are more abstract than the ones currently held. I worry that humans are not psychologically equipped to manage problems of this scale.
Bali just launched a 5 year digital nomad visa, as soon as my current rent is up I'm going there.
The remote tree is useful, but a fully visual representation in the editor would be best. It seems that I can force the game to reflect what I set in the editor , but not make the editor visually show what is happening in the game at that specific moment.

E.g. imagine I am creating a platformer (for a totally hypothetical example) with a moving platform. There is a bug in the game where the player sometimes drops through the moving platform. In unity I can pause the game when the bug happens and then in the editor I can visually see all of the colliders and so on and quickly work out what is happening (e.g. perhaps the collider for the platform is too short or something and so the player misses it). In Godot it seems there is no way of doing this. Yes I can use the inspector on the remote tree, but this is not easy to visualise the colliders and their overlapping. Add in 3D and it gets even harder. Perhaps I am just missing some button somewhere? Debugging collision issues in Godot is proving to be a real pain in the backside without this feature.

I guess that for Godot it just shells out a new process to run the game and the game is not running in the editor as it appears to be in unity, and that makes it hard to visualise the state in the editor.
Congress delegated their authority to the EPA. Congress is empowered to retain that authority and they're empowered to overrule any EPA regulation they disagree with. Congress retains all the power.

When it comes to the Supreme Court - that's it. Congress can't do anything about Supreme Court rulings. Your comparison of the EPA to the Supreme Court is misguided.
So the EPA is kneecapped since they have to go through the most ineffective and hyper partisan congress since the founding of the country.