skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Fwiw, I used to use respect-by-default until I encountered (multiple times) people who were too emotionally unhealthy and insecure about their abilities to handle it.

I literally had someone write me an impassioned email claiming that questions about why he made a design choice "served only to humiliate him, not an interrogative purpose", and that "when he did something wrong, I should just tell him what to do instead of asking him why he made that choice". This was beyond insane to me: I would hate it if someone spent 15m reviewing a design I had spent days on, and left no space for the possibility that they missed something.

Sometimes there really is a well-established relationship in which both people are aware that one person has much stronger knowledge of how to write healthy code than the other. While my instinct was to still approach the other person as a peer, experience has taught me that it often causes much _more_ friction to maintain this pretense.
It's a new literary device. Well many actually. No idea what to call them, just read my other comments and get the drift.

EDIT: yeah so it's a new form of logic, not a tree, a graph. So there's no hierarchy, it's more like Venetian Democracy: all the people elect twenty among the old to decide on which six children must vote for which ten young husbands to...it goes on, but it goes on for a while, and everyone in the city has say in who becomes the Venetian Duce.
It’s not a screening, it’s training at least according to an expert on such things, Jocko (retired SEAL commander/trainer). In a podcast talking thru the timeline of actions in Uvalde it was much clearer from his perspective that consistent training makes things muscle memory. The other key concept he talked about that paired with training was decentralized command, first on scene that has training becomes the lead person on what immediate actions to take with the information at hand and leads. He does call out that he isn’t talking SEAL level training, just basic stuff, using radios, using information learned (i.e. where is active shooter, what direction are they shooting, etc.) and what actions to take, how to breach a door, basic stuff.

After listening to his perspective and the accounts of what happened it’s obvious now there was a lot of indecision and no leadership. His final point was people will scoff at police spending 20% of their time training and he counters with would you rather have 10 hardly trained police show up or 8 well trained police show up to an event like that. His reaction to a lot of the “arm teachers”, etc ideas was also “they need to be trained”.
My college fraternity purchased a former sorority house turned retirement home, with the intent to turn it back into a fraternity house. Neighbors objected.

We had to take it all the way to the state Supreme Court to use the dwelling as it was originally intended and zoned.
Can you bypass the default flash translation layer on commercially available drives?
Am I the only one who's totally unable to spot the apparently-obvious difference in the comparison photo GIF at the end?
Neat. All the best! This is a great summer activity for anyone who's starting out in the field.

It also has some worthwhile projects that can grow into something of your own. Like, the elevator simulator could be made into some kind of game, etc.

You could use different languages, frameworks, etc. or polish your skills in something particular that your team uses.

Here's the original list that the OP mentions: https://github.com/florinpop17/app-ideas
I really wish, certain groups would leave European history alone, instead of twisting it for the purpose of their talking points. (Compare, "Hitler was a socialist", "Hitler was an atheist", etc – but this is really as off-topic as it is disgusting.)
If speaking kindly to plants helps them grow, imagine what speaking kindly to humans does!
Gao's work on the location of samples was greatly helpful - his other work...eh... in that paper you linked, he actually references papers speculating that Covid was in Brazil in 2019 and to a paper that takes seriously the idea that Covid was in Barcelona in March 2019 (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.06.13.20129627v...). I don't think he's a lab leak conspiracist but I do think he's got as much of a motive to shift blame elsewhere -- namely outside of China -- as anyone in the world, and acknowledging that the animal trade caused yet another pandemic would be politically damaging.

WIV was established before the concept of of bat coronaviruses could exist - so technically they are in Wuhan because some cutting edge communist insect research was there -- but in the support for the lab post-SARS, they were repeatedly promoted (mainly by the Chinese government so take with a grain of salt) due to their expertise, familiarity and proximity to bat populations. Hubei is consistently listed in the lists of areas with needs for increased viral surveillance alongside Yunnan and Guangong -- the earliest post-SARS work all shows this. As recently as 2019, scientists from the WIV were researching Hubei bat populations... people are acting like it would be completely impossible for betacoronaviruses to show up in Wuhan but it's a misconception that dishonest people are happy to promote. There are tons of coronaviruses in China, and tons of them in Hubei/Henan/Shaanxi area, it's clearly more likely that a new strain comes out of the Laos/Yunnan area since that's where SARS1 came from and they seem better adapted to human crossover, but with migration patterns and the history of virus collection there, it's not that unlikely for a Hubei-centered virus to exist and it only takes a single strain to cause a pandemic.

The fire analogy is a good one -- of course it's your fault if your campsite causes a wildfire -- but now we're talking about the nuts and bolts of forest management to prevent any fire from turning into a wildfire. Loosely, much GoF work is akin to controlled burns, or maybe closer to studying fire dynamics by burning overgrown areas. Potentially dangerous but likely useful when "the real thing" happens.

In any case, this thread is a bit stale, but I'm sure it'll just be a few weeks before some new conspiracy theory has started and all of the same tired tropes get to be knocked down again.
D has a feature which makes the compiler serialize the assert-ed expression into a format string so the runtime values can be printed contextually.
And this would be completely wrong. These browsers differ so much in respecting user privacy, stance towards trackers, telemetry, using native controls and integration with native iOS services.
These are some of my "Typescript type system" based projects:

Wordle:
https://codesandbox.io/s/wordle-typescript-d4srgi?file=/src/...

Anadrome(Anagram Palindrome):
https://codesandbox.io/s/anagram-palindrome-7u14xr?file=/src...

Candy Crush 1D:
https://codesandbox.io/s/candycrush-u2v5pr?file=/src/index.t...
For some definitions of same as.
>>What's 600% ROI if it turns out it contributed significantly to inequality, both for income and race?

I don't see improvements in the physical economy appreciably increasing inequality.

Most inequality seems to step from housing scarcity driving up housing costs. [1] (see Figure 3)

Improvements in transportation could even mitigate this sort of inequality by overcoming spatial misallocations caused by housing scarcity in the highest productivity zones. [2]

[1] https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2015a_r...

[2] https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/mac.20170388
Wings(/flaps/ailerons) are great for that, too, depending on their orientation. And arguably simpler. More effective at high speeds, but then apparently so are these fans.
Dang. I thought I found that 8 hours later.
> It is hard to argue with the fact that humans are social animals and gain enjoyment from connecting with others, whatever age we are.

Maybe except for schizoid personality disorder:

> lack of interest in social relationships, a tendency toward a solitary or sheltered lifestyle, secretiveness, emotional coldness, detachment and apathy.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizoid_personality_disorde...
Are you asking this genuinely to find some items that Webkit doesn't implement, or are you coming in with the conclusion already that WebKit implements everything. Just saying since your replies here seem to be arguing the latter without giving benefit of the doubt to the original posters.

E.g. if you really want to learn what features safari may not have, why not actually go down cyanydeez's post and eliminate each as not real standards. Unless this is a "do my homework/persuasive paper at job for me", they've already provided the pointer and if you really want to learn, going through the list one by one on your own time is probably high ROI.
ROS has been pretty incredible for robotics research. It reduces the barrier to entry for new postgrad students.

I would guess that most University robotics labs are running ROS (based on robotics publications).
There's probably a Dunning-Kruger shaped curve for "probability of turning the widget on and off" versus "widget knowledge".
It's very very difficult to get people to adopt systems that have already been labeled as failed.

If Angular is indeed simple and pleasant, perhaps there's a space for a clone and a new name, like NodeJS versus Rails.
I like your point and I smiled while reading it. I don't think this regulation is good either. But not for this particular reason.

The iPhone is a general purpose smartphone, and your TV is not. The "smart" part of the smartphone makes it useful without Safari. See apps that integrate with health devices or simpler uses like offline Google Maps. Neither are functioning as a "phone" but instead as a general use computer.

With the exception of the iPhone, no other general computing device is currently enforcing a single browser.

(And the "smart" in the "smart tv" does not get even close, as their apps can do almost nothing in comparison.)
There were some limitations for third-party browsers on iOS that made them slower than Safari in the past, notably that they couldn't use the Nitro JavaScript Engine.

https://9to5mac.com/2014/06/03/ios-8-webkit-changes-finally-...
> That’s the trendy opinion for now. This seems to be cyclical. Citing the NYT isn’t really helpful since you can find basically every diet fad/trend in their pages.

I didn't cite the NYT as information about dietary facts. I cited a famous NYT article which unveiled the details of a massively concerted effort by bad actors to invent fake research and then force it onto an entire country as medical fact. The article doesn't make any claims about diets, but instead enumerates the actions of pro-sugar conspirators. So you've concocted this entire argument around something neither I nor the article said.

Your NYT links consist of a letter to the editor, an online Q&A column, one article which specifically discuss how unsaturated fats are good and saturated fats aren't actually bad in moderation, and one article which discusses the business optics of marketing fat/sugar usage from the perspective of an ice cream company. None of what you presented shows inconsistency, and it certainly doesn't qualify as evidence that NYT is bandwagoning or waffling.

> Personal experience tells me that sugar and refined carbs make it harder to maintain a healthy weight, and that’s enough for me. But that’s not a “facts matter” frame. An anti-fat/pro-carb person could list out a whole book worth of facts leading in exactly the wrong direction

Writing a book of personal interpretations and opinions is not the same thing as practicing scientific research. You're declaring that the very existence of detractors from corroborated research magically turns all of those widely-accepted conclusions into "dime a dozen" opinions. If that were how things worked, the very concept of factual information would cease to have any meaning.
Precedent itself took a beating on Friday.
>I love how you just ignored the rest of my statement

You're making an argument for infanticide (abortions at 41 weeks <---your words) and wondering why I didn't follow the rest of your arguments?
Yes, if I could have the ability to exert the same level of control over the hardware as Apple (including things such as the Secure Enclave) then it would be the ideal way.
Why? You got many people who don't want to get a flu shot for other reasons. But if lets say Alzheimer's makes the people who normally gets it forget to go, then that would greatly skew how many with very early Alzheimer's gets flu shot, making it look like flu shots "protects" against Alzheimer's.

And no, checking whether they had it beforehand doesn't help, it starts to develop many years before its symptoms are so strong that you identify them as Alzheimer's, forgetting rare and optional appointments certainly wouldn't be enough to say it is Alzheimer's yet. That is why scoring well on an IQ test also "protects against Alzheimer", it isn't that the IQ test protects you, it is that the IQ test can detect effects of Alzheimer's before a diagnosis can see it.
On the flipside, my formative video game experiences involved reading the instruction booklet to a new NES game, cover to cover, while being driven home from Toys R Us. They were essential to knowing how to play and appreciating the storyline.

The Atari 2600 was no different: You needed the manual to know what the weird symbols onscreen meant, or what the switch settings would do for that particular game.

Of course, things were different in arcades.
Look at about 8 o'clock roughly 2/3 of the way from the center to the edge.
It doesn’t take any paranoia. There’s been several instances of journalists using FOIA requests to get the names and addresses of firearm owners and then publishing them. It just happened again in California post the recent USSC decision: An LA journalist requested the names and addresses of current permit holders.
The munchies you got after smoking weed would lead to diabetes and high blood pressure and stuff like these in a long run.
Look at around 8.45-9pm (clock dial direction) in the photo, you should see it readily now.
We have a desktop WebKit browser and the amount of work needed for iOS browser is astonishing. So much that we didn’t even start working on the iPad version yet after three years. macOS, iOS and iPadOS are like three different operating systems with completely different UI/UX paradigms.

But we are not a good example. Take Firefox or Chrome on iOS, teams with hundreds of engineers. They are terrible mobile browsers. They feel completely out of place on an iPhone. Not because WebKit is bad, but because building a good, native, iOS browser is incredibly hard.
The mean age was 57. I’m guessing that the people were older and less healthy than the typical smart introverted HN type you might be picturing. If you know elderly people who become isolated this rings true. In fact I think that at any age social interaction with other humans is one of the great sources of novelty in life that can help keep us sharp.
In my experience people who are isolated tend to be intelligent but have cognitive distortions like anxiety, depression, etc, which takes up their internal cpu. People who have a robust social life, on their terms are a distinct group separate from people who have a social life that’s less fulfilling than they want it to be.
I'd heard that with the fertile crescent, not the Nile valley.
Dr Kermit Gosnell performed a number of elective abortions that late in term, and we only know about those because he was dumb enough to get caught killing a few after delivery.
Well then we're just getting into debates about what determines the "correct" meanings of word. I read the original article and most of the comments here using my understanding of the term, and it made sense that way...
I have seen this in my city with changes to the schools. No matter what changes are suggested, a group of people gets upset. I suspect they want to make all changes difficult just in case there is a change one day that they actually don't like.
With a sufficiently-narrow soldering tip and a sufficiently-steady hand, sure ;)
Correlation does not imply causation. One of the lowest-fertility/highest living-with-parents countries on the map has people living with parents because of a multigenerational family culture. People have been living with parents for generations, and having kids just fine.

Living with parents doesn't carry the same stigma as in the US or Western Europe.

The reasons for low fertility have nothing to do with living with parents there. They have everything to do with complex and rapid social changes following the fall of communism which are too long and complex to get into.

I actually agree with the overall conclusion *in the US*, and likely in other parts of the world. However, the argument seems flakey.
Anyone who is confused by this should go to a school board or school planning meeting in a deep-blue district. You find "deep blue" citizens absolutely going nuts to ensure their school abides by little of the values we typically think are progressive values.
The old versions of insulin are still very cheap. its the much more modern versions that are much better at controlling diabetes, with much less side effects, etc.
I'm happy to have been part of the rout. It wasn't so much the drop in crypto value as it was the danger of bankruptcy and total loss of assets.

I'll have to redirect my money to something safer - horse race betting.
And then what bad thing happened?

And if FOIA is really the problem (not the government knowing) then the registry could be made legally exempt from FOIA. The government keeps databases including all of your income (IRS) and your religion (the Census) but random journalists can't get the information.
I’m sorry but this is a dangerously inaccurate summary of Australia’s gun laws and how they are perceived socially. For starters, private gun owners are not actually allowed to use their firearms in self defence. There have been some cases previously where people have and have been acquitted on grounds of self-defence, but if you use a gun on a person you are 100% going to be arrested, jailed, and charged, at which point you better hope you have a good lawyer.

It’s also extremely uncommon for even farmers to have shotguns. They fall under a different, much much more restrictive category (similar to pistols) and are generally not used by farmers who instead opt for bolt action rifles for pest control.

Additionally, it’s worth pointing out that the idea that a country needs a “well armed militia” is very American (or at least, not at all Australian). None of my Australian friends or family want this, and everyone I know is very happy with our gun laws and the social safety they afford us. I’m sure there are some Australians that disagree, but the widespread sentiment is overwhelmingly that Howard did the right thing in rapidly enacting sweeping gun reform after the Port Arthur massacre.

Your assertion that a non-primary-producer can only own a bolt action rifle is also incorrect. Anyone with the appropriate license can own a pistol or a shotgun, the requirements around frequency of sporting event participation are just much greater for these categories of firearm as we consider them much more dangerous to society and so (reasonably, imo) dramatically limit their ownership to only those who actively and responsibly use them for sport.

Finally, the scrutiny a person comes under for owning a bolt (or lever) action rifle is fairly minor. You need a safe place to store it (the state provides requirements, and the police will inspect it before granting the license, and also perform occasional spot checks), you need to be a member of a sport shooting association, and you need to participate in one shooting competition that is certified by that association per year. This is easy to do for someone who wants to own a gun in the city, as the only legitimate reason to own a gun for a non-primary-producer is sport shooting at a shooting range anyway. The most valid complaint I can think of is regarding this is that the storage requirements make it practically impossible for a renter to own a gun, as the safe must be either really heavy (making it very expensive) or permanently affixed to the building (a modification most Australian rental agreements forbid).
I think it depends on how confident you are regarding the change and how important the code is. If something needs to be done, don't use language that suggests it isn't important. Similarly, don't made a big deal out of things that don't matter.
I'll second that rec, same story... I wouldn't consider myself at all an expert based solely on that book, but it did give me a lot more confidence in branching out from a straight-and-narrow configuration, that I'd at least be able to know what to look up when I run into problems.
On the other end, the competition (namely Firefox) can't flourish either if all it can do is to be a skin with some sync features on top of Safari.

All Apple achieve with this is to slow down the inevitable, especially if the smaller players can't catch up because of it.
> new and unexpected.

So on a South Tower flight, supposing I weren't a child at the time and were the man I am now, like you know the time of day, you know they're flying north, you know they're not turning the plane around to Cuba, which is what the itinerary looks like but like but it's not exactly it. And thirty minutes is an eternity for that.

So the key is flashing on the truth, so there's like a couple times in your life, or in History, where the problem is intractable. So for instance, for the 2008/2009 crash, there were government spokespersons saying "nobody on Earth could have seen this coming. Maybe from Mars they could." Well guess I'm a fucking Martian then, because if you do see it coming, you can short the market in the nick of time, high leverage...et cetera. If you can get it to the day, that's priceless. Somewhere in the trillions in value, pays out once per cycle.

But if you do it! Not if you almost do it, so close but no cigar, no, do it! Time the market! Fucking nail it! You just gotta be right!

And then nobody can fuck you with surprises. Not even the first time. Doesn't matter if it's new and unexpected. Spinal reaction.
The original post seemed to be concerned about tone, not content.
I don't follow. If you don't have a problem (in this case expensive housing) why would you need to do something about that problem (in this case rent control)? It's extra complexity serving no purpose. And that will inevitably come with enforcement issues, disputes, lawsuits, etc.

But yes, I think you're right that rent control is typically a political result of insufficient housing production. But it's a bad policy. Price fixing is never the answer to a supply problem, even if it's a popular one.