skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Lower latency is very, very far from the same thing as more bandwidth. Certain customers can benefit from the difference in latency. Not you, though.

Starlink will make those who would benefit (hedge funds, mainly) pay through the nose to get it. And, pay even more to keep somebody else from getting it. Probably they will charge a huge premium for 1ms faster than fiber, and 100x more for each ms better than that.

You may be certain they will not use that extra income to provide you better value.
Interesting, thank you for the insight. I've only ever been exposed to SAFe and always thought it was too detailed and not flexible enough to be applicable to every team/scenario. It's interesting to know that it was actually people misinterpreting Agile.

Would you say that practicing the agile philosophy generally looks different on a team-by-team basis?
Please don't get side-tracked by the content of my question.

It was just meant to give a little bit of my perspective and how it might factor into the question overall.
I want to add the guide to submitting patches for the Linux kernel [1]. It contains a bit more finer points, in addition to what's on the site you linked.

[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-pa...
And what about places like phoenix and Vegas?
Only if your God is capitalism.

Not everything is about maximizing profitability. Efficient markets are pretty good at optimizing around steady-state systems, but they are profoundly bad at maintaining readiness for cataclysmic events. Yet cataclysmic events happen and we are obliged to prepare for them.

If we let corporations run everything, they'd sell of our medical stockpiles, build levees exactly one inch above the waterline, and sell all of our weapons to the highest bidder.
I would encourage you to dig into why that is the case.
Are you sure about that?

https://www.al.com/entertainment/2014/10/how_do_christians_f...

Anecdotally, I am Black and live in in a predominantly White county that was a famous “sun down town” (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WErjPmFulQ0) in the 80s.

The people in that video still exist in the county. They just have been overrun by professionals moving in as builders took advantage of abundant land and built houses over the last ten years.

It’s just not as acceptable to espouse those views in modern society. I’m sure some of the family members of the White girls my (step)son dates (the county is still only 3.8% Black) would not approve of their relative dating my son. Don’t get me wrong, by “relatives”, I mean grandparents, older relatives, etc. I’ve never sensed any hostility from parents. But that could be because they think we “are one of the good ones”
Putting aside the fact the state has infrastructure designed for 20 million people (current population double that) water management was designed to have a five year buffer for cyclical drought years which has recently has been catastrophically mismanaged.

I wish the LA Times would focus on that and the reality that if the state continues to grow, water pipelines from the northern states and Canada will need to be constructed.
Sort of. Rust's Standard Library documentation describes the entire language in perhaps the way you're thinking of

https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/index.html

e.g https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/keyword.as.html explains the 'as' keyword

https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.i128.html documents the 128-bit signed integer type

Or, maybe you are thinking purely a language document like:

https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/introduction.html
> But assuming for a moment that crypto can act as a substitute for traditional centralized payment systems, then it has significant advantages in some contexts over those systems.

Except that, fundamentally, distributed permission-less systems can't come close to the computational efficiency of centralized systems. So this is like "assuming perpetual motion machines existed, we could build a post-scarcity society" levels of assumption.
> None of the parties or judges dispute that CO2 is a pollutant.

The fact that all of the parties and judges are calling a tail a leg, still doesn't make it a leg.
Yes. To give the slave states power beyond their value.
> Why don't airlines simply pocket the difference??

I think they did, AA has a market cap of $8B and they spent $12B on stock buybacks from '14 - '20. Looks like all other domestic airlines did similar.

> That's why despite airplanes becoming extremely fuel efficient over the last 50 years, ticket prices keep dropping.

I think they just rearranged their profit centers. Having good prices, flight coverage, loyalty program & interchange agreements are the core product offering but they'll happily use them as a loss leader for the revenue from their agreements like branded credit cards via Citi & Barclay.
You need to buy C-level for any long term investment. You can't buy MBAsed C-level who intents to drop out with a golden parachute after two years.
We had them in the military and we preferred the boom mics. Throat mics, the exact ones pictured, did not pick up low-talking or whispering, which is a large amount of pre-contact traffic.

The new thing the DOD has spent an UNGODLY amount of time and money on is called TCAPS. They were even worse. They're noise-canceling earbuds with a bone-conducting microphone that sits inside of your ear.

Sounds great - but when you start shooting and moving (and pouring sweat) the earbuds slip out slightly, breaking contact with your ear. Every. Damn. Time. And you can't feel it happen. The way you find out is you key up to speak and no one responds to you. All anyone hears is dead air. After a while someone figures it out and says "last station, check your mic". They went straight into the pile of useless "good idea fairy" nonsense we keep in the arms room, only pulling it out for inventories. And there is a lot if that. We have monocular eye pieces in there that have a heads-up display. Some nerd thought they would be a good idea. Put it on an actual fighter and it is of no added benefit.

The only headset I have used that consistently works are Peltor COMTACs and their recent competitors. Over-the-ear noise cancelling ear muffs with a boom mike. Never had a problem with wind noise. Biggest issue was the mike being pulled away from your mouth when it gets snagged, or people who think they need to yell into the mike. They also had a compatibility issue with PRC-119Fs/ASIPs/RT-1523s where you need to keep the volume setting at 8 or below otherwise you get a high pitched squeal when you key up and no traffic goes out.
> The STM32H7 line is also based on a Cortex-M7, though officially only up to 550MHz.

Unofficially, CPU cores on the STM32H7 parts I've worked with are often stable well into the 700+ MHz range. Peripherals are another story.
StubHub?
Truth. In actuality, it's best if the understanding of "agile" extends literally all the way to the CEO (and board). Not sure how many companies can claim this today though.
> As the shortage intensifies, some industry analysts have proposed easing the requirements for pilot certification — including the rule requiring 1,500 hours of flight time before piloting a commercial aircraft.

Commercial pilots were very overworked even before the pandemic. What could possibly go wrong?

The list of airlines one deems safe enough to fly is going to shrink even more.
To get you hooked…
Everything you listed is cool, this mechanic is cheating.

Learning about other mechanics is fascinating, learning about this one would disappointing.
Congress granted the EPA power to address this, that the Supreme Court has now taken away in their extremely partisan fashion.
>because I agree with the Court that Congress never intended to grant the EPA that authority.

Luckily nothing stops Congress from making laws that clarify what they granted the EPA. If they were so fussed with the EPA doing what they were doing, why didn't they leap up and pass a law that told them to stop?

Why is it the court's job to tell congress what they meant to say? Is congress mute?
Engineering woo effect, perhaps? https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Engineers_and_woo
It's a well-known thought process that has even been covered by places such as the Washington Post (among others, to be clear)... which I took the 30 seconds just now to find for you -- even though I think it is extreme frustrating when people whine about proactive citations for this kind of thing as it simply isn't a fair way to have a conversation -- and then when I switched back here to write this I realized that "the person who made the claim" in fact said it as well.

Like, this is a well-known enough thought process that the person I responded to had already felt a need to dig into this themselves before, only they dug into it wrong as a misinterpretation of the claim. Where I'd say we currently stand is thereby "seems like a credible hypothesis worthy of discussion". If anything, I can see a more useful way to ding the original claim here -- based on my knowledge of this ongoing discussion -- but it isn't to whine about how they should have already needed to provide evidence in their initial post, and nor certainly is it "I found a bunch of counter examples".

But even that seems like a non-sequitur as the interesting thing here clearly wasn't an attempt to sideline us into a discussion about police but was instead just an attempt to make a wider discussion about annoying usage of passive voice and other language shenanigans to avoid directly admitting blame or control -- which is an entirely fair point and I will strongly claim is a fully valid thing to be discussing and criticizing of this statement by Nintendo -- and while I could see reasonably pushing back on it in that light in a ton of ways, again: that set doesn't include whining about citations during a discussion and likely doesn't include defenses of oblique rebuttals :(.
NYC has this too: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City_steam_system
> For many people, work is their addiction.

Maybe for a rare few, but generally, no. You might be highly work motivated, but rising to the level of addiction? That's hyperbole, or you don't really have a good understanding of what real addiction entails. Somebody who is addicted will compulsively engage in that behavior even in the face of debilitating injury to themselves and those around them. Maybe you can make an argument about working too long and spending too little time with your family, but that's really milquetoast compared to real addiction.

This tiktok philosopher isn't talking about real addiction, when they say 'addiction' they mean 'thing I like a lot.'
>police, FBI, NSA, ICE, or EPA--should not have the ability to creatively interpret laws

That's simply not possible unless we have literal laws for every possible infraction - like a state machine for the human condition.
Suppose I’m a pro lifer for reasons I’m ashamed of. The supreme court strikes down roe v wade, and I’m secretly pleased, but can’t admit it. Wouldn’t it be nice to defend the decision by arguing about its consistency?

It’s a red herring in these discussions because it’s not the true reason people support it.
The Court has been dodging Chevron of late. This is their second opinion this month where they conspicuously avoided mentioning Chevron: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/court-side-steps-overturni...
Not my experience. I found a lot of hubris in the few last batches of bootcamp devs I interviewed or worked with.
Climate doomerism is some seriously fascinating stuff. Both of those places are far more temperate than hundreds of cities around the world.
What happens when tech executives believe their own hype
couldn't see those on my phone. Wish I could delete my comment.
Edited. Thanks.
The state needs to start overruling the local NIMBYs and build the desal plants the rest of the state needs.

And the regulators need to chill out: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/california-regulator-reject...
> a 63-fps limit on input data would seem to place a 63-Hz upper limit on the sound this device can "see."

Obviously not because it's not taking one amplitude sample. It's analogous to taking 63 sliding FFT's per second, which may be based on on thousands of samples and capture high frequency content. This speckle pattern being sampled is some kind of FFT-like transform of the signal containing lots of information.

But the 63 Hz sampling will have to show up as a limitation. I would expect it to be excellent for periodic signals, but to struggle with transients, like the attack of a percussion instrument such as a snare drum.
That's a great point! If you can guarantee that the threads don't outlive the Mutex an Arc is not even necessary.
I have a friend who grew up and has lived in socal for most of their life. When I mentioned the reporting on extreme drought for this year, they just responded “oh they say that every year”. So I wonder how reflective that is of the mentality of area residents, even if superficially it could appear otherwise.
Ron Gilbert won’t post about Return to Monkey Island following online abuse
In a fantasy world where all currency/transactions were on a bitcoin ledger, the average citizen could analyze the data and find all the government black ops funds. All those transactions from the CIA to terrorist groups or whatever would have a spotlight on them over night.
Nah. Give me a standing desk that I can lower all the way down to a squat. Scratch that: just give me a wooden box to squat on. Where will I put that box, though? I don’t know…

(Warning: rant incoming)

It’s interesting that this “sitting is [literally] the new smoking” study-shows movement has shown how limited ergonomic tools are. Maybe some ergonomic tools are just a grift to paper over the inherent defiencies of office work.[1] Think about it:

1. People get health problems from working in an office

2. Ergo company steps in to let the managers buy ergonomic equipment

3. Ergo company makes a pretty penny

4. The company behind the office just have to spend a little more money on office equipment rather than rethink the whole structure of their work environment. (Does it work? Well, the important thing is that they made an effort)

5. Win-win

So anyway. How come the bodies of (one of) the smartest species on Earth are so fragile that it can’t deal with full-time thinking-work?[2] And how can we ever make up for it when we are contractually obligated to do keyboard-clacking/mouse-clicking/meeting-sitting for eight hours a day?

1. Better remember to look at a far-away object every twenty minutes in order to combat screen/reading-induced myopia

2. Try to (as often as possible) vary your positions without interrupting your own concentration on your task (how?)

3. Better remember to schedule some movement ritual in order to not be the new “smoker”

4. Better try to not look like a try-hard idiot as you do all your anti-sedentary/anti-myopia exercises in the middle of your open office which even has (for insult-to-injury) glass walls separating it from the common hallway

5. Honestly, even with all the fidgeting and practicing the-best-positions-is-the-next-one at work, you will have to dedicate a lot of time off-work for that old school rigorous exercise (remember the eighties when that was all it took? Supposedly)

One problem might be that companies are stupid (see: open office). But it seems more fundamental than that. How are you even supposed to do knowledge work without committing sins of sedentary?

1. Maybe a small treadmill? Could work for reading tasks or meetings. But what about your gait when you are typing and using the mouse? I’ve heard that that gets awkward

2. Memorize the codebase and apply changes in your mind while you go for an outdoor hike? What kind of outdoorsy savant could pull that off?

[1] Key word “some”. I know that some people swear by certain ergo alternatives.

[2] I know, I know. There is no “why” to evolution. We just evolved in a completely different environment. Still makes me upset though.
> someone can just pull a necklace right off you

I wonder if there's an argument to be made that nothing is of any real value unless there's also some risk of losing it.

e.g. you drop your apple in a gutter, or someone takes it from you, or it turns out to have a nice fat worm inside it
Basically every comment about the legitimacy of the ruling is immediately followed by a comment rebuking it. If you think it's the dominant opinion you may need to reflect on that.

No one brought up LGBT rights and labor politics as far as I scrolled down.

Threatening people for sharing their opinion isn't going to help your position.
I'm still like 50/50 that SBF can sustain any of the rescuing that he's doing. The crypto space so rife with fraud and con games, I don't see why he's any different. He has been much more disciplined in keeping his business from overextending, but he's just positioning himself to be king of a trash heap. I'm sure he comes out of this plenty rich, but by comparison Jeff Bezos built multiple very real and very valuable enterprises and SBF has not.
Wild speculation has been a feature in capitalism for _centuries_. There are any number of interesting historical schemes to read about where investors lost their shirts, or, sometime won big! Every new business venture has risk that it will fail, even in "stable" industries. We should celebrate trying new business that might not work. We just need to ensure we don't socialize the losses.
I've said it before and I'll say it again; "apolitical" really just means "supporting the status quo."

This is how ideology works, it the things you believe subconsciously, which make you think that the dominant political project is natural, neutral, uncontroversial, even external to politics.
So they should prepare law novelization for cabinet, cabinet should push it to legislature, and legislature should vote on that. Like in any other country.
Says not Adrian Newey. That's what fish enjoy! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hui_Shi
The spike protein alone is much smaller and can go places the virus cannot, this has already been found to cause blood clots as the spike protein gets stuck and builds up in capillaries.
Non-paywalled: https://archive.ph/kV39Y
> The term "system of emissions reduction" means control technology like scrubbers.

So the Majority asserts. The law, however, specifies nothing of the sort and intentionally uses broad phrasing.

The plain meaning of "system of emissions reduction" is "a set of measures that work together to reduce emissions" (as the EPA itself points out). And this is consistent with usage elsewhere in the Clean Air Act: in it, Congress refers to a cap-and-trade setup as an "emission allocation and transfer system." Systems clearly can be things that aren't just control technology.

The Majority is inventing an arbitrary and unsupported narrow definition of system for ideological reasons.
If the auto manufacturers don’t want chips to be part of their core competencies, then they’ll probably need to go back to building cars like they did thirty years ago.
> The only way that can happen is more power efficient hardware has come online at scale without fanfare.

Or less power efficient hardware got phased out due to the lower profit margins.
Either way it is still entirely valid to refer to Smalltalk as a programing language.
SBF is ruthless. Getting Blockfi for less than he paid Tom Brady to put laser eyes on his twitter profile!
Milon’s Secret Castle (1986)
This is about to be a ton of _personal_ anecdotes that outline why "then just drop it" isn't always as simple as that.

I often use the "office beers" analogy on here to discuss the prevalent requirement of socializing in the workplace these days. To me, I have no interest in knocking off at 2pm on a Friday to participate in office drinking culture and it's 100% screwed me in the past.

To me, I should be able to just work. I have no obligation to go go-karting, to drink with you, to talk at your toastmasters, to go bar crawl on a RAGBRI bus... whatever it may be. I add value by fulfilling my obligation of labor. Not by "team building." And, with that - I feel that if I achieve my deliverables then I should be able to go home and live my private life. Simple.

> Be the distant uncle, if you have to (this probably works less the higher up the chain you go, however)

You are 100% correct - the higher up you want to get the more you have to socialize and pander to the corporate "family." I've found this to be ubiquitous across employers to the point that I prefer more contract/smaller-shop work where it is not as prevalent.

Also, I want to note by being the distant uncle you are often hurting yourself for advancement. You have to go buddy-buddy with folks to get on their radar, and in a sizable team on the west coast there's a good chance one of your colleagues is doing just that with your management. Regardless of output - it's oft the person who has socialized/marketed more that will get the advancement.

Sorry - but in my _personal experience_ it is very much not as simple as "just drop it" in regards to that family pretense. If you even remotely want to "climb the ladder" you must participate at some level...
I tried using copilot and it literally attributed the function i was writing to someone else even before I could start writing a line. its been updated since and these errors are rare now, but still exist
Ours could not pick up whispering.
This system isn't designed for writing comments on Hacker News.

It's designed for things like filing your taxes or applying for a passport.
I have dyslexia, I wanted to write 'increased'.
Although I think that terrorists in general should be denied Geneva Conventions and protections, I do think there should have been a judicial process to determine, and make the case for said terrorist (Anwar al-Awlaki) being an enemy of the state, and an authorized target. Then, through an adversarial process, he would have had his day in court, along with all of the rights of appeal that come with a judicial decision.

I cringe sometime when I think about the potential burden of evidence not being brought forth to make a case that someone is a terrorist, and then getting droned.

> I don't want the executive or the administration to use creative interpretations to allow themselves to legally become judge, jury and executioner through executive order (pun intended) that may be very hard to claw back. The constitution and the supreme court are here for a good reason: to prevent such abuses.

Well said.

One man's freedom fighter, or terrorist, could one day become, one's political adversary.
> I'm not sure why people bring up the popular vote as if it means something.

Because it clearly shows the president is not picked by the people but through an abstraction that steals voting power from some and gives it to others.

> The popular vote was never intended to decide presidential elections.

And black people counted as 3/5th, women couldn’t vote, black people couldn’t vote, the entire bill of rights, and more were “never intended”. That’s such a silly argument.
But projects like Git do inline patches. I wouldn’t have the guts to break a convention like that when trying to submit something to the mailing list.
The commenter said "A few hundred years". Doesn't seem like an extraordinary hypothesis.
I was speaking to the industry as a whole. The more exchanges and platforms consolidate, the more it becomes the banking system, but with more risk and more complexity.
Video of Hindu tailor’s brutal killing is posted online
Your state can ship it in from another state, if they use american labor.