skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That article is a whole lot of words where it never really becomes very clear what the big "fear" is about, until we finally arrive at this:

"A feudal system in which the masses are duped into farming the lands of their crypto overlords."

Sounds quite a lot like our current system, but I digress. This fearful scenario requires the so-called hyperbitcoinization scenario where all of the world's wealth will be absorbed by Bitcoin (or other crypto). A market cap of 100T or more.

Which will never happen. It's easily suppressed by regulation. Most of the current elite won't allow it, and the people themselves, whom are already in the mood for protests, surely aren't going to sit by and end up dirt poor because they missed crypto.

As for crypto being libertarian, not really. Most are in it because it's a "number go up" technology, in good times that is. There's a small minority of loud mouths whom see it as a religion, but the vast majority are pragmatists, or plain gamblers.

Even if you consider the die-hard position, the so-called "anarcho libertarian", the author makes it out to be as if they are the devil themselves. All they say is that money should have controlled inflation and that there's freedom of transaction. I guess that's an extreme right wing position now? How very scary. It's pretty much how the 80s cash-based society was, except for the inflation part.

The biggest gap in these kind of "crypto scary" articles is that they fail to sympathize with the root cause. There's claims like "well, our current system may not be perfect, but at least it's democratic and accountable".

That sounds nice, but it doesn't mean anything. Young people experience one financial hardship after the other and grow up living in a monetary and economic system that is plain broken.

Where exactly can you "vote" on the 2008 crash, aggressive monetary expansion, zero interest rates on savings, 10% inflation? None of these things are democratic, they are hollow words.

Does crypto solve these problems? Probably not, but the above backdrop explains the appeal. In a system that doesn't work at all, why not throw the little you have in crypto? There's the potential to win big, and if instead you lose it all...it wasn't that much to begin with anyway.

If we'd have a sound monetary and economical system, that ensures a middle class existence and reasonable wealth for all, one that doesn't boom and bust all the time, one that preserves purchase power and savings, one that enables upwards mobility and the building up of assets, if we'd have all of that and in a stable sense...yes, then crypto has no use case or appeal. But we don't have any of that.

Own the failing of the current system. The status quo is completely broken.
I haven't read the opinion in detail but it doesn't appear they touched Chevron, merely ruling this particular case falls under the preexisting major questions doctrine/exception to Chevron.
I upvoted, because I heard the same, and downvoting because of reality (no longer the fed's jurisdiction) is not fair.
> This is a massive blow to the US being able to reach emissions targets.

I think this is the actual goal. I don't know if they are aware that it does not make a difference climate-wise what they believe (or not).
I'm no apologist for overpaid middle management, but... I'm not sure what the best response would actually be to this kind of question. If you answer "yes," but the final layoffs aren't finalized... you initiate widespread panic, because everyone worries that they could get laid off. If you answer "no," you're a dishonest snake. If you know exactly which departments are facing layoffs, you could answer "yes" and just jump the gun to announce they layoffs right at that moment, but... you'll still end up stressing a lot of people out and hurting general productivity.

Not trying to make up excuses for the lying here, but I'm genuinely curious what a VP should do in this position. Lie for the good of the many? Or be truthful to keep a clean conscience?
The rise of China is testing and will continue to test this assumption. The Chinese government does not require consensus. It can build 40,000 kilometers of high speed rail in just a few years. It can pull hundreds of millions from poverty. It can shut down entire companies and industries overnight (e.g. private school tutoring), jail corrupt corporate executives, and in general coerce compliance to any law.

Do you know how many school teachers in China must buy supplies for their students with their own money? Zero.

Do you know how many Chinese ambassadorships are left vacant because of political bickering? Zero.

I am not a shill for the Chinese Communist Party, Xi Jinping, or the ideology of the Chinese political system, but I increasingly am a shill for the ruthless efficiency of the Chinese government.
Impossible because their 50th guy in the Senate is a W. Virginia coal mining millionaire. He's all but literally the appellant in this case.
https://youtu.be/sCvw_eAT9aM?t=166
> economies can crash. Gold can not…

A glance at the gold prices and economies of the 19th century show that in fact the gold price certainly can crash due to gold strikes.

In addition, the stock of the planet’s gold is negligible compared to the global economy (the hard to quantify set of transactions that people do with each other) so by definition can only operate at the margins. If the world crashes so far that gold is a meaningful proportion, will there be much to transact at all?
If the US Congress passed an amendment that stated abortion is legal nationwide, then the Supreme Court would not be able to strike it down as that would be the new federal law.
The bit in the video where he says its like those tik toks where people say hey Ock let me get an egg sandwich the Ocky way is him using an accent while describing tik toks where people yell at middle eastern people in bodegas to make them a sandwich, "their way".

In 2022 its racially insensitive enough to be offensive to a lot of people. That is why they got in trouble. That and their other, worse, tik toks. Not for saying they couldnt find a grocery store.
The exceptions in the rules here for example are almost certainly directly constructed by Congress or anger from Congress and not particularly consistent with how the IRS expands laws by expanding existing theories if left alone:

https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employe...
The senate is affirmative action for rural areas. Why do we accept minority rule?
> but I have a feeling this $7 cost is the usual fantasy they advertise, then sell them for twice the price everywhere.

The current pico is sold at the stated price + taxes here in Sweden, so I don't see why the W wouldn't also be. And it seems unlike that Sweden would be special in that regard.
This is a decent definition: "administrative law principle that compels federal courts to defer to a federal agency's interpretation of an ambiguous or unclear statute that Congress delegated to the agency to administer." The ruling basically undermines the previous notion of the judiciary deferring to an administrative agency, because it just didn't, therefore forcing the legislature to be more explicit in its desires.
Seems more like an adjustment of your idea of what constitutes "food", so we're talking "definitions" rather than a "diet".

It seems merely sane to consider as "Not-Food" slurries or cakes of highly processed or synthetic carbon-based chemicals that are only distantly sourced from plants or animals, and to consider as "Is-Food" items that are very directly harvested from plants or animals.

Look at bread: one must work quite hard to find ANY "bread" product that does not contain sugar in significant quantities. That is not bread, it is cake. Sugar in significant amounts has toxic effects on the body.

Look at mayonnaise: most of it has significant quantities of Omega-6 oils. This is because the actual recipes for mayonnaise contain omega-3s, but Omega-3s have short shelf life. Omega-6s also have substantially toxic effects over the long term, yet almost everything on the grocery shelves is made with them.

There are scores more examples in basic staples.

The food supply has been massively corrupted primarily for the benefit of the manufacturers, to increase sales and convenience. That does not mean that it is still actual food.

Literally, merely changing my basic cheese sandwiches to actual (non-sugar) bread and eliminating store mayo (usually using just olive oil or occasionally mixing mayo fresh) has had a substantially positive effect on my health. It also tastes FAR better.

So, I don't consider it to be a diet to merely select actual food instead of the industrial products sold as food — I still eat nominally the same sandwich recipe every lunch as before, just with real ingredients, and I get better enjoyment and results.
Abortion is not mentioned in the constitution and therefore each state has the power to legislate it as they see fit. Any federal abortion law would be deemed unconstitutional on that basis.
https://www.cnet.com/news/privacy/shadow-profiles-facebook-h...

Come again?
He's complaining that everything that was located in his apple maps as a grocery store was a corner store that didn't sell actual groceries but some packaged food and junk food. He gats fired for satirizing Apple maps basically but they take it as insulting the corner stores --and even if he were, so what?

What kind of BS world do we live in where bosses give a shit what you think of the grocery store or corner store down the block?
> The supreme court ruled that abortion is a state issue. Any law passed by congress would be struck down by the same ruling.

Is it? Then why am I reading news today about the Democrats wanting to suspend the filibuster for a federal abortion law?
I'm not a Coinbase fan but I feel these points are very unfair.

> Coinbase due to wilful negligience, incompetence

What did Coinbase do that made people lose money?

> They literally got rich by having people transfer over their savings

How is it different than any stock broker, insurance broker or bank clerk selling risky or expensive investments to people who don't know better?
And I bet it won't work as an ID in Apple Watch. However it will probably make some company a boatload of money to develop.

Meanwhile there is an entire standard of government certificates or FIDO that is made for this use case.
No. They ruled it isn't a constitutional right. Therefore it can definitionally be legislated at the State level.

Whether it can be legislated at the Federal level is a completely different question.
> Congress can still pass a law

Since when
Vimeo Interactive Video – How To
If nationalism is a more general form of fascism, are all, or almost all governments prior to the modern era fascist?
Very much a "The law in its majesty ..." take on the matter.
More specifically it's an option, the VSCode Copilot extension asks you to configure it and takes you to a GitHub page where you can choose what happens if a suggestion is a direct copy.
Indeed. People are upset with the Supreme Court recently, but what it has been doing is empowering democracy, which people are nominally for.

You want effective standards, do the work and pass a law.
> The world has never seen an economic phenomenon like crypto. There is no historical analogous technology trend or investment craze that comes close to capturing the sustained and frenzied momentum of crypto that has engulfed so many and that will continue to do.

Never say never. Greed and speculation have a long and robust history. This crypto speculation and greed reminds of of the price of tulips. [1] During that craze a single tulip bulb could purchase a mansion.

[1] https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/dutch_tulip_bulb_market...
The "dying" of the company seems less relevant than the 1 person company just not being able to deliver the level of service required to compete, be reliable (think support, on call) etc.
As an SAU member for almost 20 years, the site is a shadow of its former self. The technical areas tend to be very much a ghost town, with link-rot setting in pretty hard (broken images that were once hosted on imageshack or Photobucket for example really hurt the quality of many of the DIY guides etc). The social areas are mainly a handful of as you say the "old-school crew", but nothing like "back in the day". Other than a handful of motorsport/trackday events each year, the 'club events', especially the 'social' type like cruises and meetups, are almost non-existent. I'm not sure if that's because those events tend to now be organised over social media in smaller circles, or if they just don't happen.

In short, there's just not really much attracting new (or existing, evidently) users to the forum these days. I'd say it's a classic catch-22... people don't frequent the forums so the content (and experience) suffers, and then people don't want to frequent the forums because the content and experience aren't that great any more.
I find this so weird, I always feel like I have to at least a bird's eye view of how bits and bytes are flowing through the system. Not that a lot of boxes I don't just label as "magic", but at least I need to know the box exists
> We always believed that RP2040 was a great fit for commercial and industrial applications

I always believed the Raspberries, Arduinos, etc weren't suitable for large-scale industrial applications.

Do they really use Raspberry Pis in commercial/industrial products?

Please forgive my ignorance, I have zero experience in the embedded systems industry.
Is a constitutional amendment different than a federal law when it comes to how it’s treated by the SCOTUS?
As to whether or not Crypto becomes a legitimate form of currency is neither here nor there, but in its current history it has (seemingly - I am not an economic historian) mirrored the Dutch tulip trade of the 1600's in many ways:

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/dutch_tulip_bulb_market...

How Crypto comes out on the other end remains to be seen, but there can probably be some technologies that can be salvaged in legal and shipping contracts, for sure. As far as digital currency and items goes, in games and life, that remains to be seen... proof of work currency will probably die, if I had to guess though.
Unity is for games. Without the games market, a company like Unity can't exist. Unreal Engine is used for dataviz and media production projects, but it's business is games.

His point is that if Excel lost the business world, the fact that people do things like write games in Excel will not save it, and he is asking you to understand that the assertion that Unity is used for more than games is roughly analogous, which it is.
> He is no longer an employee of Outreach.

It's a direct reply to the tweet. Not enough?
The company literally confirmed he got fired on twitter if you look at the thread.
I am not the OP but we run SaaS on top of the OpenZiti platform - happy to discuss using the open source to securely deliver SaltStack or other apps.
I did not make such claims that when women have affair its not to satiate physical needs. There could be rare cases where women only gets physical satisfaction but its sad to me that there are people who view women and men as equal we are built differently and experience the same thing differently.

After all if your mom wanted to get her rocks off she could hire a male prostitute like your dad.
No, such a claim is overly broad.

It is common and reasonable for legislation to delegate responsibility. Administrative rulemaking has been around for a long time and will continue to exist.
> being the most powerful of the three branches of government.

By pushing the responsibility to lifelong bureaucrats? I honestly don't see a difference there.
As mentioned in the dissent, congress explicitly gave them the power to regulate green house gasses in this specific scenario. But the majority conservative opinion made up their own rationale as to why that somehow doesn't apply in order to curb the EPAs power.

The modern day supreme court is a joke, unable to be even remotely consistent in how it applies its rationale and its clear they're merely another puppet for conservative politics.
and is the keyword. These studies are not controlling for only high quality red meat in the diet. Eating anything processed is going to confound the data in the study, as opposed to something like a hunter-gatherer diet in which most of the calories come from hunted red meat. Those cultures don't get cancer
> Healthier democracy

How can anyone say that with a straight face in the presence of the electoral college (heck even the elected representatives don't have a legal obligation to vote for their party's candidate) and most importantly gerrymandering. Your assumption that the people can vote to enact change is simply not true.
Hey so one thing that my SO mentioned was never wanting to wear one despite being an avid cycling because of the danger of them being caught on something!

If you can find some that are wireless and are crescent (so not fully closed) maybe that would be safer!
The majority of federal law isn't mentioned in the constitution. Come on now.
I don't get your point or you don't get mine. The individual individual's incentives are to have benefits without them being measurable income so Tax being about dollars makes dollars less desirable without many more actions from the state to force dollar measurable transactions.
That's not the primary mission of the Raspberry Pi Foundation, yes things change overtime but I think it would be a major mistake to make the Raspberry Pi into a product in a classical way ( even if a large chunk of their success is coming from "the market" )

In current market conditions what you want would cost at the very least $100 and would require active cooling some of the workloads. The question is: would you buy it in those conditions? Most people don't and worse than that, the Raspberry folks would "lose focus in their mission" and the "product" would be just another one in a sea of clones.
I used to be confused by this. It's because "git" is in the name and GitHub is the first thing you encounter, so I was like, "oh, is git some command line extension of GitHub?" rather than the reverse. :D
code output is unrelated to the issue.

the issue is if GitHub hosts your code with an open source license that does not allow for-profit reuse without concomitant sharing, like the GPL, they will incorporate that code into their product in violation of the license, and claim the license doesn’t apply because the code isn’t code but merely text.

they built their business on precise and detailed articulations of consent and its boundaries, but disregarded all of that, post-acquisition, because Microsoft has enough lawyers that they think they can get away with it.

so, for the subcommunities and creators who put their work on GitHub in the context of these very specific and fine-grained articulations of consent, this may be theft and is certainly betrayal.
1) I think you’d be really interested in taking a look at twice-exceptional and profoundly gifted kids. My overarching thought on this is that mastery learning works so much better than classroom-style learning and any education solution that allows for 1-1 learning where students advance at their own pace, moving on to the next concept when they’ve mastered the one before it -whether that’s parent-led instruction , tutoring or self-directed with books and apps is going to be so so much faster. That’s why you see a lot of techies like nir eyal, naval, eric ries, Albert Wenger, doing modular learning or homeschooling w their kids. Mastery learning leads to two sigma better scores than group learning. And kids do learn Aton through play but there is no reason we have to smoosh together academic learning and social learning. Check out Benjamin bloom.

2) as an educator, I often find that the mom can take a more proactive role and I always wonder if I should say something. I don’t know where you live but the world is changing and I think it’s totally cool to shake up bad habits. You can absolutely tell your kids educator (in a kind way) that you are really passionate about your kids education and would love to be included just as much as mom. Or say hey I notice you direct correspondence to mom, We’re equal partners in this do can you include me ? I think many will be thrilled. On the other hand, I will say it can be useful to have one point person in the family. It’s just a lot of extra but important work teachers do communicating with parents and having to do it twice doubled the load. Maybe that point person could be you instead of your partner !
Be the leader in changing the culture !
?. You mean the EPA?
For referance: https://nypost.com/2021/10/22/nyc-bodega-gets-tiktok-famous-...
Maybe the author thinks it is easier to steal or harder to secure bitcoin than gold. I think it is sort of nuanced and could go either way, but I would agree that bitcoin is easier to store: especially with a trusted multisig setup.

Bitcoin owners have a lot of cheap security options based on their spending habits risk model.
>economies can crash. Gold can not, thus is it valuable.

The thing about money is that it is a technology. But unlike other technologies, such as an electric toothbrush, for instance, it has an additional quirk: without belief, it doesn't work. Regardless of whether or not I believe in electricity, an electric tooth brush turns on and off; if the participants in an economy don't have faith in the economy, the economy falters. Money's value lies in this belief, whether it is the belief that I can buy groceries or pay taxes. It is a faith that is a function of utility: there is the interdependence of the gods' delivering and my belief that they will; should the gods not deliver sufficiently, my faith wavers; likewise, if enough of the faith of the masses wavers, the gods fail to deliver.

Gold is like an old god: its faith has a lot of coinage. However, its rule is not necessarily omnipresent.

Scenario: we are in a post-nuclear apocalypse. I have a small trading post and a can of beans; you have a solid gold coin. Challenge: convince me why I should take the coin.
You are talking about revenue neutral at a population level. What matters to individuals is their own revenue. The impact of these changes on individuals varied a great deal. Many middle class lost valuable deductions while wealthy people saw their rate drop dramatically. There is absolutely nothing remotely neutral about any of that. So the only context where neutrality can be asserted is the same one where the statistician drowns in a lake that is an average of less than three feet deep.
Well worth being aware of. The third most common cancer for men and women [1], with only an 'average' survival rate [2].

[1] https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-...

[2] https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-...
I've always been intrigued by the idea of a language that enforces a separation of queries and command. Functions (queries) return values and have no side-effects, where procedures (commands) that can have side-effects and don't return a value.
Epic did nothing for indies before Unity3d distrusted their market. Before Unreal was a big player game engine with a high upfront cost.
Crypto lender Babel Finance wins debt repayment reprieve after withdrawal freeze
It's time to de-sanctify the Supreme Court.

I really don't like having this unelected councils of wizards who get wield god-like "authority"-- it feels a bit gross in a democracy.

I 'get it' w/ respect BrownvBoard, Miranda, etc, but at least in my lifetime the court hasn't done much to expand or protect my rights. Greatest hits from them are weird election cases (Florida 2000) making it easier for really shadowy/fucked organizations to plow $$$ into elections.

If these folks are indeed just umpires & good old legal "scholars" who are there to call balls & strikes, why are hundreds of millions dollars spent promoting + grooming these individuals?

Going forward I'm very much in favor of subtle "judicial humiliation"-- across the board de-sanctify this institution

Step 0-- make 'em take C-SPAN cameras