skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The Teensy 4.x are based on a Cortex-M7 chip[1] from NXP. The STM32H7 line is also based on a Cortex-M7, though officially only up to 550MHz.

I haven't studied the capabilities much, the biggest difference I could see was that the 550MHz version of the H7 only comes with 0.5MB SRAM vs 1MB SRAM for NXP one, while the H7 with 1MB SRAM only goes to 480MHz. However the STM32 parts comes with flash memory included (up to 2MB), while the NXP one has none. To me it seems the STM32H730VB[2] is one of the closer matches if you favor speed, while the STM32750VB[3] if you favor SRAM, but it depends heavily on the metric used for comparison.

[1]: https://www.nxp.com/part/MIMXRT1062DVL6A#/

[2]: https://www.st.com/en/microcontrollers-microprocessors/stm32...

[3]: https://www.st.com/en/microcontrollers-microprocessors/stm32...
> sway people purely philosophically

yeah these same types of purely philosophical arguments have led me to move away from services like DropBox and Google Drive at my own expense. Lost too many hours trying to find the “we do things the right way” alternative—when it comes down to it, if it works well and keeps the friction low, mf’s can have their bag
Quibble all you like, it has been that way for living memory, and reversing this is going to cause an enormous amount of chaos, because the modern state is built on these assumptions.

This is not some minor change, you're going to throw the federal government into chaos. I know that's the goal for a lot of people, but they should have the courage to admit that.
Which is why “textualism” is the only appropriate interpretation an unelected court should be using.

It’s not their job to write laws or advance policy, it’s their job to enforce the constitution as written.
> I don't think LaMDA (or any other AI) is conscious or sentient.

Neither do I, but it would be easy to blur the line more than they have.

Make it stateful, tick it at 30fps, and give it access to a persistent environment it can observe and explore.

If you can ask it “what did you do today?” and it can give you a real answer, then we can start asking the interesting questions about what’s missing.
I just built a keyboard based on the RP2040 because it's cheap, capable, obtainable, and you can also write rust for it. The RP2040 is interesting though with its PIO peripheral.

Do you know of any RISC-V chips which have something like that? Generally curious too about which RISC-V chips are as widely available as the RP2040
I do really like GitLab, I use it at work daily.

But they manage to change and sometimes break the UI in every update and it just gets more and more bloated every day. - At least that's what it feels like.
You can tell things have improved since the Great Gatsby, since these appear to have words inside them.
I honestly couldn't live living in the US, I just couldn't exist there knowing that my tax dollars and simply my existence there helps bolster such violence in other countries, good that I don't need to with how common wfh is these days

But yeah, rough stuff
If you’re talking about the decision overturning Roe, it has literally nothing to do with whether a federal abortion law would be constitutional.
> Python, Julia, and Jupyter notebooks will simply wipe out all usage of Mathematica outside of a few esoteric fields.

I'd wager that most of Mathematica's usage today, and in the past has been for those esoteric fields.

MATLAB always had higher market share for numerical work.

Mathematica's strength is in pure math. And nothing out there comes even close - not even SageMath. I wouldn't be surprised if all the pure math open source developers who are also math experts out there are fewer in number than those who contribute to Mathematica. You need detailed expertise in a math discipline. William Stein - founder of SageMath, wrote once on how impossibly difficult it is to get grants to support SageMath - most of them go to Mathematica or MATLAB. So if a math faculty member wants the extra income from grants, he/she is going to write a proposal targeting Mathematica, not SageMath.

Of course, once Stephen Wolfram dies, I don't know if Mathematica will continue to survive. But as long as he's alive, no open source pure math SW will overtake it.
Ask HN: If you would have a virtual assistant, what would you make him/her do?
I'm curious to know what are the top things you would outsource to a virtual assistant
>>They are limiting the ability of the government to make and enforce laws.

They are in fact doing the exact opposite - telling elected officials that you need to make and enforce laws - not give that responsibility to someone else.

Do you think the IRS should be able to set tax rates? then how is this different?
Taiwan creates new challenge for tech industry: stern content regulation laws
What's the point of states?
I agree with the Court. Quoting a WSJ story https://www.wsj.com/articles/supreme-court-limits-environmen....

'WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court on Thursday curtailed the Environmental Protection Agency’s powers to restrict greenhouse-gas emissions from power plants, in a decision that could limit the authority of government agencies to address major policy questions without congressional approval.

Elaborating on earlier decisions, the high court said federal agencies need explicit authorization from Congress to decide issues of major economic and political significance, drawing on a principle known as the “major questions doctrine.”

In his decision for the 6-3 majority, Chief Justice John Roberts said Congress never gave the EPA the authority to change the methods a power plant uses—regulations known as “generation shifting” requirements.

Chief Justice Roberts said that forcing a nationwide transition away from coal may be a “sensible” idea, but the EPA cannot do so without a clear authority from Congress.

“A decision of such magnitude and consequence rests with Congress itself, or an agency acting pursuant to a clear delegation from that representative body,” the chief justice wrote, adding that the “EPA claimed to discover an unheralded power representing a transformative expansion of its regulatory authority in the vague language of a long-extant, but rarely used, statute.”'
Something as simple as a pre-commit hook that checks files that were changed in your commit and rejects the commit if the rules aren't followed is a very cheap and effective way to enforce a coding style.

For a python project for example, you could set pre-commit to check formatting, linting and typing, which means that when your code reaches the remote repository, before any CI is even started or any PR is openned (before you even push really), you know your code follows the rules that have been set for the project. Thus everyone knows you don't need to spend time in the code review looking for these mistakes and instead focus on the actual features.

pre-commit does not even need to be pushed to remote to work, so if your company has no plan to enforce it but it still helps you, you can still use it, unlike a CI.

As for this:
> And if, god forbid, I miss one, just get over it. It can be fixed later. It's not nearly as important as having correct functionality in our app, and I'm pretty busy!

It's true that one mistake is easy to fix later, but it's just as easy to fix now. If you postpone it once you will postpone it again when it's not highlighted in a PR diff, it's just a recipe for never fixing it. Every language has automatic linters/formaters that check (and even fix) your code according to rules you define, turning the work of finding these mistakes into a simple `lint ./src/` command. It's takes a small amount of time to setup but saves you a lot of time down the line.
> There is simply no underlying value within any of these coins. Why would a sane person invest in them?

I remember hearing the same arguments against Ebay and other e-commerce companies: this is all vaporware, there is no physical value (meaning bricks and mortar storefronts), we should prohibit people from investing in all of those, etc.

I personally would not touch most cryptos with a 6' pole, but that is just my opinion. We should still allow someone who believes in this space to invest their own money the way they see fit. My 2c.
I did not write anything about what I want or do not want.
Emphasis mine:

> The case against the EPA was brought by West Virginia on behalf of 18 other mostly Republican-led states and some of the nation's largest coal companies.
>
> They were challenging whether the agency has the power to regulate planet-warming emissions for state-wide power sectors or just individual power plants.
>
> These 19 states were worried their power sectors would be regulated and they would be forced to move away from using coal.

I'm losing hope that anything practical can be achieved because of idealistic nuance like this. We're missing the forest for the trees. Our goal should be the larger combating of climate change, but individual players like this have amazing power to put up resistance or obstruction to that goal which is a net loss for all of us.
> When you have thousands of metrics, uptime kuma and bunch of friends wont help you.

This is fair! Actually Uptime Kuma still doesn't support a multi-user mode (e.g. one admin user, multiple users that can edit values/setup, maybe some for viewing data).

That said, I'm also at the scale where it makes perfect sense to use something this simplistic and there are few things that give me joy than running/building a container image and getting working software in less than an hour, which at my scale is also good for most if not all "day 2" concerns.

> Detailed App/Infra metrics can also run on your own infrastructure unlike status pages that should use something independent In your case, if your local mattermost fails, you will get 0 notifications.

Another fair point! That said, there's very little preventing you from choosing the most boring and stable multi-cloud setup that you can find. A Docker container for the software, with a reverse proxy and connected to the aforementioned infrastructure monitoring.

Has the Docker service failed? I'll get a notification. Docker bridge network down? I'll get a notification. Containers fail health checks? Might still need to work on this, but totally doable as well with minimal work.

Of course, there's also a lot of variability to how you can lay everything out - for example, I run some of my personal infrastructure from nodes that are in another room at my place, most other parts off of rented VMs in a semi-local company. My homepage, for example, has both Uptime Kuma as well as external monitoring service connected to it, just to compare how believable those values are.

At work, though? For development/test environments, Uptime Kuma on a separate server is enough (say, if you have one that controls the container cluster or aggregates other metrics, might as well spin up a simple container there), or any other software package that's necessary, like Apache Skywalking etc.

For production? Frankly, depending on what you're running, you might as well get a team of people together and come up with something that has proper redundancies in place, as well as a multi-cloud strategy.
> So the hustlers are always going to be one step ahead from regular folk.

I don’t disagree. This is always going to be the case in any global market with information asymmetries - grandma’s investments are not going to do as well as a hedge fund with a team of 50.*

The difference is: the people entering CeFi are having access to their funds revoked, and a counterparty failing to repay debts while fleeing to Dubai. while the people entering DeFi have not had access to their funds affected, and are not worrying about counterparty risk.

This is why it is a shift in power - the users retain control of their funds and leveraged positions, as opposed to placing that power entirely in the hands of tradfi and CeFi companies.

* ironically a lot of big players like 3AC are getting wiped out too, so it isn’t always true
I think this is kind of dumb. Why on earth should the FCC give a damn if consumers are emailing them about potential interference on the 12GHz band? This just isn't a topic where consumers should get to weigh in. It's a technical question, does the planned mobile usage interfere with SpaceX's usage, I'm sure SpaceX and Dish both have highly technical teams capable of putting forward the required studies to come to an answer. The FCC should consider the evidence, not listen to uninformed correspondence whipped up by SpaceX.
This is a very far-reaching decision. The decision is really that Congress cannot have a federal agency regulating anything unless Congress specifically votes on something like the filtration efficiency of item x in smokestack diameter y.

It has implications for other things too. For example, the post office. How about 50 individual post offices instead of a national post office since now logically the price of a stamp cannot be adjusted unless Congress votes on it, etc.
That part of my comment was just having some fun along with the author who was also tongue-in-cheek about mentioning Arch. Having spent too much of my life troubleshooting Windows bluetooth issues, I suspect most are in agreement with the author here.
“We managed it for 900 years” someone in the Roman Empire circa 394 AD.
I think some kind of dramatic failure less likely than a gradual descent. More like Hungary, Turkey, Venezuela or something than some of the more, uh, 'exciting' examples from history.

Of course, things going badly in the US is going to have spillover effects everywhere else too, so that's something to keep in mind. I'm not sure how isolated various places would be.
You would think they would have reversed Chevron, or distinguished it. But note, I've not read this decision yet, and I'm taking your word for their not mentioning Chevron.
Is this based on your experience having tried both? Because that reasoning is questionable. IEMs don't block all sound from hitting your eardrum, some of that sound will hit your eardrum via bone conduction. And ANC headphones do block some sound passively, the inner ear ANCs can often create an airtight seal.
Every layoff I've witnessed first or second-hand was preceded by the same promise within <2 months from the layoff. I've come to the conclusion it's a necessary evil. These questions are only asked of leaders at companies on a shaky footing. As a CEO, your only option is to deny there will be layoffs. Any other statement will cause panic.
What you're describing is pluralism and federalism, not minority rule. Minority rule with your examples would be to force cities to burn their trash because that's what makes sense in rural areas.
It doesn't change dramatically with EVERY election, it just changed dramatically with the last one due to a lot of judges retiring/dying off at once. Just a generational phenomenon.

SCOTUS leaned liberal (in the sense that liberal justices tend to believe in larger-scope interpretations of Constitution) for a long time, now for the first time in a while they're leaning conservative (the Constitution says what it says and if we want it to say something different Congress should pass an amendment).

Honestly I find myself falling into the more Conservative camp from a judicial perspective. I'm all for gay marriage and a woman's right to choose, but I feel like we used SCOTUS to do an end-run around Congress to get both at a federal level, and from my layperson's reading the constitutional justifications for both feel stretched to me. In the same sense that you can use creative interpretations of the Bible to justify basically anything, you can do similar things with the Constitution. That isn't how the system is supposed to work
Weird, I thought Gorsuch was pretty pro indigenous.
Samsung Begins Chip Production Using 3nm Process Technology with GAA Arch
> I'm not sure where we go from here.

Going to hit the wall and let the corporate decide.
No, wrong. Incorrect. Roe v Wade was explicitly a ruling saying that abortion should be broadly allowed, and that no government (neither state nor federal) can regulate it (with caveats). Overturning Roe v Wade has given that power back to the state government and to the federal government.

None of this had anything to do with the federal government regulating it. It was the court saying it was a right not to be infringed upon.
If "profitable" is a switch you can flip, then what you're describing makes sense.

The issue is that many of these companies have never demonstrated that if they want to they can be profitable. The big assumption in these growth models is that there is a point where you can just magically flip that profit switch.

For example if I run a lemonade stand where I spend $3 to make a $1 glass of lemonade, even if I am able to use investor capital to keep growing my lemonade stand to be the only lemonade stand in town, or even the world, it's not clear that I can survive if I'm forced to make a profit.
Not the OP, but many folks treat the SCOTUS as divided into the red and blue teams, and that they have to vote like whatever party would, vs an independent check on the other two branches of gov't.
I don't. When I last worked for a start up someone else took care of the software escrowing and I don't remember which service we used. Now that I'm on the other side of that transaction I leave it to our procurement group to evaluate the software escrow service.
The same SCOTUS that ruled that the agency established and authorized to give birth does not have the authority to regulate birth. Yes.
I think this is pretty typical daycare behavior but it doesn’t mean it’s ok and shouldn’t be dealt with. certainly would encourage your son to use his words and set healthy boundaries, such as “you may not hit me.”

And to ask for help from the teacher. I would not encourage to teach him to hit back as that would most certainly escalate the situation and put him in greater danger as a child and adult.

Not sure about “boys will be boys “ that seems to be normalizing male violence in a way I don’t agree with and am uncomfortable with.

Would it be ok with you if a colleague hit you ? No it’s not ok at work and not ok at the Oscars. These boys rough housing need to learn to self-regulate and that is best done by a skilled educator who helps them learn and sets healthy boundaries with healthy consequences.

You might want to consider enrolling him in a karate class or some other martial arts class if you want to teach him how to have a strong presence that no one messes with and defend, not attack if absolutely necessary.

I will share that at three times in my life, I’ve been in danger of a sexual assault, once at the door of my apartment in nyc at 5am, once in the Paris subway and once in a stairwell in Haifa .

In each occasion , without thinking I turned around , hit my attackers arm away from me and screamed in my loudest deepest voice from the depths of my lungs “NOooooo!!!!” In each occasion they swiveled around and ran for their life (I will add I’m a petite 5’4 woman and they were much taller and stronger )

Had I hit them back, the situation might have ended much differently.

Please do not teach your child to hit back.

Please know it is normal to ask teachers to intervene if your child is physically hurt. When you intervene on behalf of your young child, he will feel safer and so he will feel stronger because he knows you are protecting him he will develop the power to protect himself.
The point is that FCC is considering licensing the bandwidth to some mobile networks as long as it doesn't interfere with existing usage. SpaceX says it will, Dish says it won't.
The Pkgsrc-2022Q2 Branch
Ask HN: Dog Pile or Backlog?
When your team members are done with their sprint work, do they help with work on the tickets within the sprint or do they pickup items from the backlog?

What would you prefer?
I don't think that Bitcoin is extremely anarchist / libertarian. It would be similar to gold standard. There would be no unlimited funding for governments through central banks. It would limit government spending, but also ensure that politicians are wise and responsible. In my opinion, democracy needs hard money standard to function properly.
For those that haven’t checked it out the ideas behind urbit are really interesting, it’s the first attempt I’ve seen to get us out of the local maximum of centralized web services we’re trapped in where success is among the potential outcomes (most attempts are destined to fail because they don’t tackle the underlying issues from first principles). I think it could really work and I’m convinced urbit or something like it eventually will - the ideas are correct.

Jack Dorsey’s “web5”, Dan Romero’s Farcaster all touch on a lot of these concepts - people are starting to come around to the same conclusions (which is good!) - urbit had just taken a boil the ocean approach on a bet that we need to rethink the stack from first principles so we can control certain assumptions to reduce complexity and make some of the problems in modern computing easier to handle.

Finding it really felt like the first time I started playing with Linux for me. It revived a lot of the dreams of the 90s web and what it could be, people being able to run their own nodes in a way that could actually work.

To do that you have to solve the identity problem, you have to reduce the complexity of running the system, and you have to have the internet front and center when building the OS.

The dream of a truly decentralized web from the 90s failed and it failed for reasons that make sense given the constraints of the technology we use. I think urbit is a way out.

An old blog post (from 2010!) that really digs into the details: https://moronlab.blogspot.com/2010/01/urbit-functional-progr...
Stop saying g 'the left'. There is no 'the left' in us politics.

>This isn’t the end of the world though, Congress can fix everything that’s happened in the last few weeks via proper laws.

No, this us pretty much what the end of the world looks like.
> I'd like to caution other people who are feeling despondent and thinking of leaving that this is exactly what they want.

Could you clarify who "they" is in:

> this is exactly what they want.

?

And are you being a little hyperbolic (nothing wrong with that, we all do it especially when impassioned) or do you really think the supreme court (or whoever "they" is) are trying to cause an exodus of people they disagree with?

I'm not challenging/disagreeing with you, just very interested in understanding your thinking.
I truly wish more people were legally literate, and considering how much intellectual overlap there is between software engineering and legal writing I would have expected better from the HN crowd, but so far all I see is a lot of talking point parroting about partisanship from those who clearly haven't even tried to read the rulings.
> Positive example: The FAA has done an incredible job making air-travel safer than car travel. I have a feeling that a lot of the higher-ups are former engineers and have been able to put politics and red/blue crap aside for a common mission.

737MAX enters the chat
I see. I’m probably jumping the gun here, but if such a federal law were to be passed is there something in the Constitution that would disallow it? I suppose it depends on the exact wording and so on?
On constitutional issues, the Supreme Court is absolutely a second version of Congress, except they're unelected and mostly choose their successors.

It is a side-channel for lawyers and activists on all sides of the political spectrum to achieve what they couldn't achieve in the legislature.

Judicial review was a mistake.