skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I've worked with both models, and the monorepo model has been far more demanding in terms of time and resources to maintain as you push past the limits of the available tools one by one. Standard build tools go out of the window almost immediately (lots of work to wrap everything with Bazel), then standard collaboration tools (GH) and so on. A dedicated tooling team becomes a must.

What helps maintain polyrepos sane

1. A healthy methodology for dependency management

Evolve APIs with deprecations. Decide on a healthy amount of time for a deprecations to live. Set up alerts when deprecations reach certain amount of time. Set up dashboards (e.g. Grafana) to track dependencies. Help other teams update, and think about how to make updates less painful.

2. Define good boundaries and API contracts to adhere to. The most important thing for a good API contract is stability.

3. Don't prematurely split into microservices. Better ideas for stable API contracts emerge the longer you can wait.
OK, since apparently you can't use a search engine, here's the first result on DDG for "woman imprisoned for miscarriage":

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-59214544
> if string slicing requires anything more than slicing at code point boundaries, you're going to need fast indexing to code points.

Why? I can safely slice anywhere in UTF-8 code units, and align to the next (or previous) grapheme cluster just as easily. And this is actually useful if I have some storage limitations, unlike codepoints.
By being at the borders of colliding empire vasall-states, were both sides prop up the front-states and use soft-power as much as possible. Follow the iron-curtain lines of the blocks in the cold war to find countries that got rich that way.
All measurement, but especially so at the quantum scale, involves interacting with the observed subject. One of the observations made by quantum mechanics is that you can't observe a system without interacting / altering it in some way.

To give you a macroscopic example, the way you detect the color of an object is to apply electromagnetic radiation in the visible light spectrum to the object and see which wavelengths are absorbed and reflected. The process of absorption and reflection is a physical interaction with the object you're looking at.
> You cannot be forced to donate a kidney to save someone else's life: they have no claim on your body

Hell, even a dead body is not forced to give up a kidney if its previous inhabitant did not sign an organ donor consent form.

In America, women have less right to their body than a corpse.
> I don’t think that people who talk about football are stupid

Hah. I actually do think they are, and I've had four years of not talking to my brother because he feels insulted by my opinion of his sports obsession.

There's nothing wrong with value judgments.

I don't know what your interests are, because you haven't expressed them. You've only expressed disinterest. Surely, if you have interests, there are other people with more knowledge in the area than you have, who you could learn something from. You can't possibly be the most knowledgeable person in everything you're interested in.

Nor is anyone with your same interests likely to be a saint, or even worth spending time with in other capacities; but you may find you have something more in common with them than just your mutual interest if you care to look.

> I do not feel superior, I feel inferior.

You're not inferior. You might be self-loathing. That's ok. Everyone worth anything has been at one point. The only people not worth shit are the ones who never felt inferior.
It is life, but not human life. At fertilization, new DNA is formed. It's not the mother's and it's not the father's. It's new human life.
“With or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil - that takes religion.”

-Steven Weinberg
Why should the system for managing source code have anything to do with the architecture of the deployed code? This coupling seems arbitrary to me.
I suggest you read this article about thoughts from prominent GOP leaders: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2024-watch-trump-pence-supr...

Also consider what the Texas GOP has said about gays and gay marriage over the last week.
wait, what names?
He would say the reward is a meaningful life.
Are those vehicles fully battery-driven? If so, I would be disappointed. It is so easy to add overhead wire and save massively on batteries, making the project even more sustainable. A small battery to enter-exit is okay.
The word "helpful" is doing a lot of work in that phrase "helpful problem solving."

For starters: which phone is the most secure option for HN to make a call to a therapist-- an Iphone SE or a Pixel 6 Pro running Graphene OS?
Dispatcher saves two people by facetiming them after their boat sinks
Agreed. The entire site reminds me of the racks of magazines I browsed growing up. Lots of bait, but in the end just a bunch shallow articles and lots of ads.

I often learn more reading HN comments than the article that is being discussed.
See? That's what I was talking about. Learning the UI before learning what it actually does :)

This only leads to confusion once you use 'git mv' and edit the file significantly enough in the same commit. "Why doesn't git show that it's a rename? I explicitly told it so! Did I do something wrong?"
Good articulation of why things don’t quite play out that way within a company here https://rushjs.io/pages/intro/why_mono/
> Part of that science is about motivation, and from my experience, free education is not always what is best, and we saw that in many students. It has its place undoubtedly, but there is also power in motivation, discipline, determination, and accountability - many of you have succeeded because of these traits.

How does paid education influence motivation, discipline, determination and accountability in ways which a free education does not? This reads like a shot taken at public education but maybe I'm misunderstanding here.
> You’re leaving out that Thomas also said that some of those and other implied rights might be found in the privileges and immunities clause.

Yes, and I also leave out (as, hiwever, does Thomas as well) that many of the substantive due process cases, including the line of marriage cases including Loving and Obergefell, were, in their own decisions, were found to be mandated independently by each due process and equal protection clauses, such that the Privileges and Immunities clause analysis Thomas suggests would be entirely superfluous unless the Court not only through our the substantive due process theory but also just read the Equal Protection Clause into a nullity.

Thomas also leaves out that the Court has (long before coming up with the Substantive Due Process theory he calls on it to reject), actually already done the P&I analysis he calls for and rejected the idea that that clause covers anything other than explicitly enumerated rights, and only (as it expressly states, so it would take a rather tendentious reading to remove this limitation) those of citizens (note that this problem would not exist with the Ninth Amendment which is fairly explicitly about unenumerated rights and, along with the EPC, is a more commonly cited alternative basis for the same rights that have been found on substantive due process grounds raises in legal scholarship, concurrences, and even, IIRC, expressly in some substantive due process decisions as an express concurrent ground for the decision the way the EPC is in the marriage cases and some others.

> Also, I’d be curious to know if any other advanced democracy has a doctrine similar to Griswold

The US doesn't even have a doctrine similar to Griswold; the right in Griswold was upheld by later cases on a substantive due process basis (closer to Byron and Harlan’s concurrence), but Griswold itself wasn't actually a substantive due process case.
Comprehensive list of modern reproductions of vintage sound cards
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-hBDjYtE1U
Has github done any more to promote the deed than that blog post?
Podcasting 2 and Value4Value usher in a new era of podcasting that’s free
Well, likewise for you, isn't it?
Here's another video about this lock from a month ago with a lot more comments from lock aficionados.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNHFyc1oMwU&t=716s
After many years of reading about quantum effects it's just became clear that most of the unintuitive nature of it is due to confusing language.

"Measuring" is usually hitting the system with a photon. At those scales it is similar to measuring the state of a person by shooting him with a canon, you would not be surprised if the "Measurement" changed the state of the person.
Thing is, people are not being rewarded even monetarily. Wages have been stagnating for many years.
Many will end up homeless if they're not paid enough, and it's getting there.

So no, replacing money with feel good benefits is not good enough.
Most importantly it causes a problem where you're tied to a particular benefit if it is important.

You cannot really have a community when people don't have enough to eat or place to live. Even more so, when some cop will arrive and force you out ignoring that community if you don't pay.

It is also hard to build a community when you work 40+ hours a week, as people tend to be drained and need serious alone time to rest, especially if their work involves constant contact with others.
Like looking for certain broad points of compatibility. For example, dominant and submissive traits are very fundamental to our nature, and too big of a mismatch here will be a source of conflict (two dominants) or unfulfillment (two submissives). There's a lot of wiggle room and nuance of course, but in broad strokes some people want to make the decisions, while others want to have those decisions made for them. It's important to take stock of where you want control, and where you want to give up control (and find someone who's somewhat close to your complement).

You'll want at least some common interests so that you actively enjoy some of the things you can do together and are not always doing things together for the others benefit (although that IS important some of the time). You'll want somewhat similar approaches to home life (a major source of conflict). Some compromise is healthy, but too much is stifling.

Honest, open and respectful communication is an absolute must in both you and your mate (with the odd slip-up that you make a point of correcting). Vulnerability basically comes with the territory here, since you can't be fully honest and open without becoming vulnerable. We all have our secret hurts and shames and desires and insecurities, and they'll always be a source of weakness if we can't trust our partners with them (after which they become a bond of strength).

Having a deep relationship with another human being is a humbling experience, because it's impossible without sharing empathy and burdens and trust. It forces you to live outside of your own little world, and I'm beginning to think that I likely wouldn't have been capable of such a thing in my youth, even if I'd known then what I know now...
Thanks for the (mostly irrelevant to this case) details, but I can't divulge the reason for the No, and I do suspect it would still apply.
On top of this I think there’s classical music, which none of then large streaming services get right, hence Primephonic and IDAGIO. Apple bought Primephonic so I wonder if they they intend to release an improved metatdata model with Apple Music.
I accept my ignorance
Feels like a fluff piece, I’m not sure what we’re supposed to get out of this. It sounds like 42 and Qwasar were/are coding boot camps, which are a dime a dozen.
If it happens, it will be enforced by private institutions, not public ones. Like your credit score. Your bank and your insurance company and businesses offering services and your employer will know what you’re saying and doing and they’ll offer special status to those who they deem low risk, and then everyone who doesn’t qualify will just not be eligible for services or will have to pay a much higher price. It’s a plausible but not inevitable future. But here in the west where everything is getting privatized anyway, it won’t be the government, it will be the quasi government of the insurance and financial sector and maybe also your employer that does it.
indeed I should, I was commenting off-the-cuff, thank you for the admonishment!
Wow !
Reminds me a lot of "Resident Evil - Raccoon City" :)
> My neighbours all talk to us for starters.

Having suburban neighbors constitute one’s close friend group is obviously possible, but it would be almost entirely a matter of luck. One has very little control over who their neighbors are, and limited ability to survey a neighborhood before deciding to move in.
As usual there's an XKCD that's relevant: https://xkcd.com/538/

I assume that most people know that this is more of a hobby thing (and a cool one), but I also forget that not everyone has demolished a house with a handheld reciprocating saw.
No it's exactly the right question to ask, and you're not offering a rebuttal: you're simply making an asinine point about effectiveness.
Because anyone with any insight into human nature can see this would happen.

You're a traveller in a lesser economically developed country. You're in the wilderness, you haven't seen anyone in a while. You see a stranger, who sees you're travelling alone and invites you to a meal, eager to share a part of their life with you.

Now this is how GitHub is acting:

At the end, you reach into your pocket for a note of the local currency, the stranger shakes his head.

You continue taking out a nominal amount.

"No", the stranger says in his language. You insist, putting the note into his hand. The stranger looks offended. You smile, oblivious.

"THANK YOU VERY MUCH!" You repeat and kill the stranger's act of altruism.
I don't have experience with using Julia in really large code bases but my intuition has always been that the combination of these design characteristics in one language:

- easy unrestricted composability

- lack of well-defined interfaces

- lack of an effective way to use the strong typing system to validate correctness

is not a very good idea.
Clearly in 1973, when Roe was fatefully decided. 30 states had laws against abortion at the time. Talk about the minority.
You can have a monorepo without having all the modules share the dependencies. For example you can have multiple go.mod files in a single monorepo.

People often conflate these two things because often teams actually want to have centralized dependencies (so that you're forced to update or die as you said). If that doesn't work for you you can choose to have modules (or groups of modules) keep their independent set of dependencies, all while keeping the code in the monorepo.
If $500K is such great PR that it's worth it to the company, I hope we can see a bunch of other companies (and, hey, divisions of Microsoft) do it too!

Presumably people are just as or even more upset at all the other companies who use open source internally but don't give cash like this to large numbers of open source projects? Right? [insert Anakin Padme meme] If all big companies donated $500K a year to open source, that'd be a pretty significant change in the environment, wouldn't it?

I have noticed for a while that HN comments lean really anti-Github. I don't really understand why.
The saving habits was mainly of the post-WW2 generations that have to follow a prudent life style to survive. Highly doubt that Confucius has anything to do with this.
If people here, in a place where many people write logic for a living, cannot parse simple logic out of a statue, imagine how a judge or a jury would do it.

I feel like often people in criminal justice do not understand meaning or intent of a statue and wing it, often slanting towards the side of punishing defendants. The law doesn't matter when your goal is to lock people up.
I clean it up when it clogs and feels uncomfortable to browse (or just too big). I also have Downloads/Persistent, where safe to lose but useful distros and downloads reside.

I wish programs and systems could just access small files through the browser as if it was a local folder, that would reduce the need for all that.
Even more legalese ... there have been doctors sued for just stating on their website that they perform abortions.
Teacher: Why are only [veterans] allowed to vote?
Student: It's a reward for doing government service.
Teacher: No. No! Something given has no value.

Teacher: What's the moral difference between a civilian and [veteran]?
Student: A veteran accepts personal responsibility for safety of the body politic, defending it with his life. A civilian does not.

-Starship Troopers classroom scene https://youtu.be/EBxgrr0wL8M (Heinlein had some weird ideas and the movie's satire isn't obvious enough to those who most need it to be.)
Second. StackGres is phenomenal
Same with humans, to a degree. Actuarials place your chance of dying at 50% after the age of 80. So we 'stop aging' after 80!
Not to mention, specifically made illegal in multiple constitutions for more than the reasons stated above.
The issue is not that the bugs are with correctness of multiple dispatch, but that multiple dispatch allows you to combine generic programming with abstract data types. Thus, one can have a generic implementation in base Julia, and someone can pass a new user data type - a combination that can easily not work. Some of the frustration also arises from types such as OffsetArrays that are included in the base distribution, but not as well supported and tested as the regular Arrays type. Thus, the discussion here tends to focus on defining interfaces, and of course on better testing of uncommonly used data types.

In general, we've not had a formal roadmap - but we present a "State of Julia" talk at JuliaCon every year. But very broadly, the list (of the top of my head) includes: improving a lot of the underlying compiler infrastructure overall, improving support differentiable programming, improving garbage collection, support for GPUs from multiple vendors (too many of those now), supporting apple silicon, type system support for tools like JET.jl.

NEWS.md is generally updated during the course of a release cycle, which eventually becomes release notes, and then post release, we put together a highlights blog post. https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/blob/master/NEWS.md
This is so incredibly wrong.
Three Mechanisms for Crypto Contagion
These are called “chilling effects,” they cause people to self censor when it comes to socially controversial positions. Historically, this would include womens suffrage, black rights, gay rights, various religious positions…

It’s not okay to be tracked so thoroughly that people stop feeling they can explore controversy online
What is the $10M ARR business that has donated $500K to open source? I will do my best to give them even more applause.
Just this morning I listened to a radiolab podcast: "the wordless place", which talks about how a word puts something in a category, and that doing this can take living concepts and turn them dead, like putting a firefly in a jar without air. It makes reference to something named the Zeigarnik effect - for remembering unfinished or interrupted tasks better than completed tasks, and it analogizes this to the ability to better remember a phenomenon in its detail and nuance and contextual connection better when you don't have a word for it.

In this case, putting a word to worry is used as a good and effective way to stop worry, which is an angle that had not occurred to me.
> what happens when you represent strings as an index of code points

What happens? Are you referring to a specific problem that Python 3 has?
For a lot of people (IMHO), it's one of those "walking the path is different than knowing the path" kind of things.

2 hours also seems like a lot more than it is, in part because people severely underestimate how much "free" time they had before.

For example, they think they are working from 9-5, but really, most people do lots of little things during that time - browse reddit, whatever.

That time also now can get eaten by kid stuff - scheduling, signups, etc, especially if you have 2+ kids.

It's also rare that it's a single block of 2 hours.
They're worried about a new type of colonialism through AI and I get that. But why not then use those countries' laws and culture as a baseline. Yes, you'd have to manually input this data somehow. Have an AI (or a questionaire) ask a simple set of questions to a set of people, start from there and learn from there. Keep the AI asking questions every so often to better its model.

I'm sure I'm missing something. It's never that simple, right?
Your childhood sounds nice.

All the money in the world couldn't convince me to go back to trying to take care of so many adults with such a limited set of resources as I experienced in my childhood.

To me, agency is everything. If you don't have the resources to enforce your boundaries, they don't exist, so childhood is entirely luck of the draw.

As an adult, I get to say, "No," to things and have that matter. Things may not go exactly as I'd like them to, but I have options, and that makes adulthood infinitely better than childhood ever was.
positive developments, people are beginning to understand that media organisations do not neutrally report findings, but selectively promote narratives for political or commercial agendas
What a bullshit comment. Define “better”
That you claim 'abortion is obviously murder' shows you don't even understand the position of those who claim it isn't. Go do more research on the side you don't hold.
Whatcha building, walterbell? You’ve been providing links to a lot of shop equipment lately.
Education is always paid, and the beliefs embedded in the curriculum taught are always naturally aligned with the interests of the payer.

There is no "free" education.

If that's taking a shot at public education, well, it just depends on whether you think the government's interests are always aligned with the interests of pupils
I think you’ve misunderstood Manish’s point (which is made clearer later in the article—the wording of the sentence you quoted is poor).

Manish’s contention is that there is no virtue whatsoever in O(1) access to the nth code point, because code points aren’t a useful abstraction.
Per DORA and the information in Accelerate, shipping code frequently and reliably contributes directly to good outcomes. It seems like a good investment.
School always ended in the early afternoon, after which you had enough time to finish homework, and you could start playing/tinkering/relaxing before parents returned from work.
It’s the exact opposite. With this ruling, long-time red states will never have to flipping due to low voter turnout.
I agree. However most of us (understandibly) don't think this when we are 13.

If we created an identity that is completely different than our real identity when we're 13, great.

If not, that becomes a problem without an actual solution especially in the age of Internet archives.
You can choose not to have kids- unless Christianity wins in America and turns the country into the republic of Gilead.
You're painting everyone located in a red state with broad strokes.

What you're suggesting also affects anyone that votes blue in red states, including business owners and workers that are trying to change their state laws.

Changing the law is harder when you're calling to economically punish those businesses and they have to layoff workers or close. So instead of campaigning on the weekend and persuading people to vote to change the state law, workers will be looking a new job. This maintains the status quo rather than help garner support to change it.

What you're suggesting is regressive and hurts the pro-choice movement in red states.
Yes, that's the proposition: potential bad government instead of potential extinction.
With the traditional family gone, that is probably the only thing left. Luckily, meaning can be found in different ways.