skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> There is no baby that is "viable" (able to survive on their own) (well, to be honest, most adults aren't either), and parents are required to care for them (and criminally liable if they fail to do so).

Babies are viable when they can survive with help from any adult. Before some fetal age, they are completely dependent on the body of the mother - if they are removed from it, no matter how gently, they will die (perhaps there is some way to make a fetal transplant, but that wouldn't necessarily change the equation so much).

Once past some age (and especially after birth), they just need someone to take care of them, it doesn't have to be their mother.
Provide evidence to support literally anything you're claiming.
I believe the “real” reason is to disenfranchise voters and seal their majority.
Possibly they were stupid enough to get high on their own supply, and kept operating capital in cryptos instead of USD.

This is a classic mistake of banks. When allowed to do so, they think they can improve their returns by running trading desks. That's why we in the US used to have Glass-Stegall, which kept banks and brokerages separate. Because, before and after Glass-Stegall, banks got into trouble that way.

Nobody runs a pure crypto exchange that doesn't trade for their own account.
Crypto exchanges are depository institutions, asset custodians, brokers, lenders, market makers, and exchanges. All those customer assets, just waiting to be exploited.
> Any other questions?

Since you seem to know a lot about "arms," is a sword an "arm?"

> functionally different than:

I believe you can take your tank off your property, assuming you went to the DMV and got license plates and a VIN number for it.
Algae and fungus can be done in the dark, but there seem to be some limitations to full plants still:
"Plant tolerance and consumption of acetate as a heterotrophic energy source will need to be increased to fully decouple plants from biological photosynthesis."
I don't understand your take. Do you assume that all consensual sex happens with the intention of reproduction?
And as a corollary: if you have those, and the company is investable, it follows that what changes in a "down" market is the valuation.

The change is dramatic and fast though, and minds take a beat to catch up to the market.
Cows are not making land scarce and cars could be said to increase the supply of land because they allow you to access more of it.
Thought experiments are useful as intuition pumps, and very widely used in philosophy. And the particular argument I was responding to was about a moral argument for complete bodily autonomy.
It's not a baby, it's a fetus. The potential for being a baby is not a baby. And by what mental contortion is it not a woman's body? You're obviously not speaking from the position of having your life and health put at risk by carrying something that puts the greatest strain on a human body most will ever endure.
The intention isn’t relevant - sex leading to kids is hardly some unknown fact. Other than rape, in which case agency is removed, why is conception not the point in which the choice is made?

Is your opinion that anyone can reneg on known consequences of their actions?

Don’t misunderstand, women should have a choice in what their bodies are used for. My assertion is, other than rape, they already have it with respect to having a kid or not.
the advice nobody wants to hear but is actually true. ofc you also need to be highly competent yourself, but that is table stakes
Consent to eating is consent to taking a dump.

Social constructs don't apply to biology.
> … Java, C#, or Go … all roughly in the same performance class.

As-in "Notice which box plot IQRs overlap."

https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/...
I’m proud of myself for getting all the way through TIS-100, and I think I still hold the records amongst my few peers who tried it.
I am very intrigued by this system which smacks of Getting Things Done (he even mentions how to integrate it) but its so disorganized and all over the place it seems a bit schizophrenic.
That's a well known fact about how masks work in general, yes. They have a large effect on transmission from the wearer and a comparatively small effect in preventing transmission to the wearer.

However, when you have a limited supply of masks, it's impossible to give them out to every potentially-infected person, so saving them for high-risk people (like healthcare professionals, who also have the highest risk of becoming infected themselves) is still rational.
What I’ve seen is services will verify the number at sign up then never again.
The smart money doesn't hold any crypto and instead take advantage of the lack of regulations to arbitrage and front run traders and speculators.
It would be strange not to. Technology exist for people. Most choices in computers and software are made to accommodate people. We are in the people business. You need to understand people to be able to produce things for them.
Indeed it is -- the ruling is about the fundamental right to privacy with regards to bodily autonomy. Without some major federal precedent like Roe V. Wade, states are free to impose to their medical will on their populace as they see fit.
Of course it is a necessary condition. In order to leak from the lab, the virus has to be collected and be propagated in the lab. And all the rest isn't plausible if they knew the bat virus they had in their vials had the potential to cause a pandemic. But it must have had some rare "talent" that was as yet undiscovered. Otherwise nothing of the "lab leak" hypothesis makes sense. You can't "gain-of-function" just any virus and end up with a killer pandemic.

You can interpret a molecular clock or a phylogenetic tree qualitatively, and you would expect to see multiple samples with the protein in question, but which have individually acquired so many mutations that they must have diverged before the dynamic. That would mean the protein sequence in question predates the pandemic by a long shot, unless you think the Wuhan lab tested the Virus in Laos...
If you take libertarinism to it's extreme like that then they should be protesting the lack of freedom of association as well but none are doing that either.
I'll sign you up to take care of those kids, then. Just feel free to email me your full legal name and address (see my profile), and I'll hire a lawyer to figure out how to make that happen. I might even offer to pay for the costs for the child you adopt doing this for the first year if you act fast!

Narrator: He never emailed.
> How on earth can citizens of state 1 go after citizens of state 2 for something that's legal in state 2?

Just like how the US federal government can go after non-US citizens for something that is legal in their non-US country? Perhaps?
Yup. Not that I think that guy is gonna care...

https://www.texastribune.org/2022/06/23/texas-abortion-law-d...
Sure it is. In the tech world at least, a lot of people will judge you negatively if you are a programmer and wear a business suit to an interview at a tech firm
My wife believes exactly the same as the OP, and she is most definitely speaking from that perspective. :)

This isn't a gendered issue, it's a worldview one. There's a very small skew towards males preferring it be illegal, but it's not enough to write off all opposition as male:

https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/fact-sheet/public-opini...
In my experience there are two types of boards in the for-profit space. If the company bootstrapped itself to profitability without taking any or very much investment, and especially not taking investment from experienced investors, the board will be a bunch of friends of the CEO who rubber-stamp everything.

For companies that either are already public or are in the pipeline of venture capital start up to acquisition or i p o, the board dynamics can be very interesting and well dynamic.

The main difference is that in this case the people who sit on the board, the startup founder CEO usually, and representatives of the various investor groups, have usually done this before and have a play book. Their objective is to maximize the return on their investment, and that's what they do professionally.

Unfortunately, in my experience, in spite of the fact that this should result in a much more functional and experienced Board of directors, somehow things still end up getting pretty weird in a lot of cases. It mostly comes down to Ego and head games various directors seam inclined to play, often having to do with previous interactions or rivalries between investor groups. Also, CEOs are often cut from a certain type of personality cloth that plays into this gamesmanship. I'm not talking about the founder CEO , I'm talking about the CEO that was brought in to scale the company up and prepare it for acquisition or public markets. He ( it's almost always a he) needs to think about his own career, especially if things aren't going as well as everybody would like to think they are. It often boils down to a game of prisoner's dilemma.

When this sort of thing gets out of hand, it can begin to feel like some sort of five dimensional poker game where you don't even know the rules. A bit like the game Mao if anyone remembers that.
> I don't know I'm not rich.
> First, there are no $5 million cars.

There are cars selling $4M new from the factory.[0] Because of the scammy economics of these limited edition hypercars, if you are eligible (!), you can buy these and instantly flip them with a million or two in profit.

If you get into vintage collectible cars, there is no real upper limit. Here is a 1955 Mercedes for $140M: [1]

If you think that is ridiculous, you are too mild. But it is real.

[0] https://www.caranddriver.com/bugatti/chiron-2021
[1] https://edition.cnn.com/2022/05/19/business/mercedes-worlds-...
"All you need to know about crypto staking"[1]

That's what they tell the suckers.

[1] https://hitbtc.com/blog/all-you-need-to-know-about-crypto-st...
Effectively, copyright is ownership here though.

Edit: I see the possible confusion point here:

> would assume the copyright any liability attached

Should read:

> would assume the copyright and liability attached
Ask HN: Rental Application by API Only?
With employment options for developers being great, established community, employment as an appropriate criteria, and easy verification; why not?
So states that ban abortion are also pushing for easy access to contraceptives, right? That would be logically and morally consistent, no? Unless, perhaps, the motive for such laws is unrelated to the welfare of the humans (child and mother, both) involved.
it doesn't function without it. In order to paste something through Maccy, you need to give it this access.

Aside: even after getting this prompt, I don't see an option to choose Maccy in the System Preferences -> Accessibility menu, hmm...

PS: I'm a huge Flycut fan – clipboard management massively improves my life, and it's the best clipboard manager that I've found.
The right to privacy is not related directly contraceptions. Alito said as much in the opinion.
> as long as contraception is legal (and who knows what will happen next)

Here’s a good indicator:

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/24/politics/abortion-ruling-gay-...

Spoiler: it looks like contraceptives are likely next for SCOTUS.
> Casinos go through regulated scrutiny to test the games probabilities are accurate so you play against math

That's only for physical games/machines, right?
> "Two lineages" in rapid-succession is weird - but no better explained by two zoonoses (that left no hints in any animal population) than two lab-leaks.

I mean, everyone can stop reading here... This is patently false. Multiple Spillover is a readily reproducible phenomenon that perfectly explains the dual lineages.

Again, spell out specifically the route how two distinct lineages would be present at the market under the lab leak scenario.

> It might slant things slightly against it - but when no other animals, anywhere from Laos to Wuhan, have revealed any of these supposed intermediate forms – that somehow zoonosed twice, only after reaching Wuhan

You literally only need one animal shedding virus - it's how literally every other pandemic started. The market was shut down weeks after it was clear that a pandemic was underway and only after that did the authorities start looking for infected animals. Absence of evidence here isn't remotely a substitution for evidence of the absence.

> with a dangerous new viral feature Wuhan researchers had proposed splicing into bat viruses?!? – the slant remains very much in the other direction.

This part is just false and belies your lack of understanding of the science and the direction of causality. The reason scientists proposed studying the FCS is because it was identified a decade+ ago as both dangerous for zoonosis and readily possible with natural mutation.

All of these virologists studying coronaviruses weren't doing it out of the blue, but because everyone knew that it was the single greatest zoonotic risk we faced.
Interesting. It looks like WhatsApp predated iMessage in the US but it never really took off. Maybe US text bundles were more consumer-friendly in the US? Though I don't really remember it that way. (I didn't do a lot of texting though and mostly expensed the handful of work-related texting I did do; friends didn't really text at that time.)
That's my understanding as well. ffsend was created as a client to the Mozilla-hosted filesharing service at send.firefox.com (now defunct). The server component was then forked and made self-hostable.
Please dont spread misinformation.

The HIV paper has been withdrawn and was total bunk.

See comments on the paper:

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v1?...
While I won't try to argue with you because abortion is the thing we won't see eye to eye on, what bout the 'or' on contraception, or do you think that responsible people only think that sex is for making babies?

On another thought, you think the best thing to do is give people you judge as irresponsible a child? Also, doesn’t original sin mean the fetus not innocent? Is innocence really the important measure? Because lots of things are innocent we don’t care about.
IRISC: A web-based ARMv7 assembly language interpreter and computer architectur
Another form I've seen is:

"A well-educated electorate, being necessary for the endurance of a free state, the right of the people to keep and read books shall not be infringed."

Clearly you couldn't expect the right to keep and read books to only apply to the well-educated electorate.
Well this was many years ago, I just checked online and they actually lowered the investment thresholds in both Portugal and Malta. So it is objectively cheaper than what I wrote.
I use Alfred, but having tried at least a dozen clipboard managers, Paste[1] is still my favorite (mainly for the way it handles presentation and searching of saved clips).

[1] https://pasteapp.io
Its the definition of gray market: "the trade of a commodity through distribution channels that are not authorized by the original manufacturer"
Persuasion isn’t that important when the vast majority of the public already agrees with you.
We already had intense media speculation about the source of the virus at the start of the pandemic because _people wanted to know_. It would have been nice to have a proper investigation at the start of the pandemic as they may have caught evidence before it could have been destroyed.
"Your advice doesn't work out in every single situation ever experienced by a human so I'm going to come up with a sarcastic comment that says nothing of value to point that out."

You'd think common sense would tell one not to define what's good for them in general based on what's good for you when they're "missing rent with an eviction and sleeping in your car".
Ginsburg was an idealist.
Klippy is an open source, lightweight and searchable clipboard manager built-in to KDE!
The only person it is tricky for is the mother, who is the only person in the universe whos opinion matters on abortion, and we must abide by the decisions of the individual.

Anything else is absolute horror of biological control and loss of bodily autonomy, and should be rightfully ignored, and anyone that thinks differently needs to think about minding their own business and not making a difficult thing more difficult. Those that use the legal system to enforce their hatred of women? Get off the planet please.
> For anyone who honestly feels this way, it would seem that the most obvious next step is to enact very strong laws that prevent that now-born perfectly viable human child from being murdered at school. I can respect such a consistent position.

I'm pretty sure there are already pretty strong laws against violence in schools, let alone murder. I think what you're insinuating on are gun laws? Well, sure. I think that every teacher should be armed and trained in the event of a school shooter because they have the responsibility to protect those children.

>"No, not like that!"

Haha. We tried it your way. Turns out criminals don't respect laws. Most gun deaths occur in gun-free zones. But those cities that are most armed also tend to be most polite and least violent. Think carefully about why that is.

> I've yet to meet anyone who takes this "pro-life" position a single moment beyond birth though. Why is that?

Again, pretty strong laws on the books against murder. I think what you're insinuating here is why aren't there government programs to raise children? Well, it's quite simple. The murdering of children is a completely separate issue. One dwells on preventing murder, and the other hinges on who's responsibility it is to raise it. I think it should be illegal to kill the homeless. To have you then turn around on me and tell me I'm obligated to take care of that homeless man is disingenuous. These are two, completely separate issues. I think that in general children are obligated to be taken care of by their parents, and I'm pretty sure we have laws on the books for that too. So, what's your issue with conservatives, really?
No. This is how you end up with flat earthers.
Is it?

> He emphasized a line the majority opinion that said "[n]othing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion."
"We have also explained why that is so: rights regarding contraception and same-sex relationships are inherently different from the right to abortion because the latter (as we have stressed) uniquely involves what Roe and Casey termed 'potential life,'" Alito said.
In spite of gerrymandering, we'll see it in the turnout. Or not.
The 8080 lacked this, but even though the 8086 was more or less based on the 8080, this probably inspired the 8086 LOOPNZ instruction. Same idea, hardcoded to use the CX register instead of B on the Z80. The unoffical nicknames for the AX, BX, CX, DX were accumulator, base, count, and data. CX was used for the count for all looping and string move instructions. Similarly, BX was special purpose for indirect operations and AX/DX for certain logic and arithmetic instructions.
It is the case. We can easily look at turnout figures.
> Women choose to have sex consensually, no?
Consent to sex doesn't imply consent to pregnancy (or even the consent to carry to term after) - it just doesn't follow, even with the risks of pregnancy.
Yes—there are tradeoffs. But HN would be a different place if it were just a collection of comments without usernames. That's not the kind of site this is, so posting here involves making some of those tradeoffs.
Banning abortion except in the cases of rape would, however, result in many fewer abortion providers and make it inaccessible for many victims of rape. There's also implementation difficulties: do you need some kind of certificate from the legal system saying you were raped (way too restrictive), or is it just a matter of self attestation (for pro-lifers, likely a big enough hole to make it meaningless)?
Disney, Netflix, Paramount, Meta to Cover Employee Travel Costs for Abortions
I think one common way to "bypass" 2FA is to have the carrier send you (the attacker) a second SIM card. If I'm not misremembering, the text message is then delivered to both cards, the original holder and the attacker. So sending two numbers would not defend against this type of 2FA bypass.
Usually the Executive Director is making decisions for the organization, not the board. They are getting approval on their high-level strategy and budget from the board, but all of the day-to-day decisions lie with them.
Remember that for some printers there are two parts, you need to change the ink and after some changes also the "cylinder". In any case I had seen a similar poor quality results in the brand. Can't recommend it.
Genuine question: what number is going to make you think the browser is relevant? If 50M MAU is not enough, what is?

Just for perspective: Firefox is at barely 200M MAU, and declining every year.
>That's an overly dramatic take. My prediction is that Republicans will now begin losing seats in red State legislatures precisely because of this decision.

Unlikely.

cf.:

https://www.cesifo.org/en/node/60300

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2018/11/13/least-thr...

https://www.evcnational.org/partisan-gerrymandering

https://changetherules.org/gerrymandering-united-states/
But we've pretty much established that it was a virus of natural origin - all of our molecular techniques leave signs, so an honest discussion would foreclose that possibility. That doesn't eliminate the possibility that it was a natural virus which had been collected and subsequently escaped due to bad lab technique but the former is too attractive a conspiracy theory to let go..
> Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.

I think if you take this to heart, you might interpret what they're saying as a defense of HN readers; that they are more inclined to talk about the technicalities of this decision rather than the effect it may have on women because that is something they can comment on.

Tact may also play a role in why people hesitate to make comments of empathy, especially since simply expressing your disdain for the decision isn't particularly substantive. I'm certain many of the people that are choosing to talk about other aspects of the decision are wholly empathetic to the people this affects.
ofc, speeddial 2, except.. they updated it a few months ago. and it's broken now. fml. no updates for years, worked perfectly. until now.. so i dont recommend it.
> What is needed is to bridge the good things from OCaml, the type system, the pattern matching with tagged types into a modern, imperative programming languages.

Like https://rescript-lang.org/?
Coincidentally (yeah, that is what They(tm) want you to believe...), that is also the title of a really fun and strange episode of the X-Files. One of my favorites.