skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> This is just incorrect. Before the 14th amendment the bill of rights did not apply to states.

"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."

I forgot about that brief time before the civil war when states felt like they could pick and choose which parts of the Constitution applied to them. Why do you think it only applies to the bill of rights, though?

I find it darkly humorous that it took an amendment to the Constitution to really drive home that the Constitution actually applies to everyone in the US. That seems like a bit of circular logic, but at the point of a gun it worked.

Imagine if states could just choose that the second amendment did not apply to them today. Ha!
Republics are democracies.
> extensively documenting and testing their software if three sentences are enough to encode it

Was just hyperbole for "from plain English specs/requirements".

I'll admit to being uninformed about GPL, but your understanding of large language models is also limited. They actually learn to interpolate between data points meaning they can compose sequences not found in the training data. Further, GitHub added a feature that checks existing code for a match and rejects predictions if any match occurs.
Plessy v. Ferguson was settled law. Until it wasn't. And it was rightly overturned after decades of injustice. I bet there were many in the 50s who cried about settled law. Basically, the stare decisis argument is very limited, and the best anyone can hope for is that stare decisis is time-limited. Plessy lasted 64 years, while Roe lasted 50. So stare decisis seems to mean "for a few decades", which I think is fair.

Stare decisis is neutral as to the content of court decisions. It can be used to sustain rightly and badly decided rulings for decades. And the court can ultimately overturn its past decisions rightly and wrongly. They can fail in the past, they can fail in the present, and they can fail in the future.
is eventually reversed (its the only action available)

But this assumes normal market operation, which a short squeeze is not. Suppose in the example above A buys the share from D and sells back to the original issuer, who then refuses to lend it out again. C can't pay back B and presumably goes bankrupt.

It only makes sense if people are required to lend securities to anyone who wants to borrow them.
It's dangerous to generalize but I think a least some subset of them already have: https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/05/02/abortion-ba...
Tech companies respond to U.S. Supreme Court abortion decision
I'm afraid your comments in this thread have been breaking the site guidelines. Can you please make your substantive points thoughtfully? That means without fulminating and without calling names.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
If you want a similar read on DCT-based encoding, I highly recommend this article which lays it out in an extremely digestible format:

https://sidbala.com/h-264-is-magic/
Storing a hash of the first three characters still cripples the security. It is trivial to brute force a hash when there’s only 62^3 possibilities. And once you know the first characters, brute forcing the remaining ones is exponentially easier
The crown was passed down by primogeniture. Everyone knew the rules going in, so it was fair and democratic.
That's it. And I'm wary of intuitions, because clearly people have very different intuitions.

What's the scientific argument for or against personhood for the unborn homo sapiens?
> The sad part of democracy is that it aims to represent the views of the voting majority.

As you said, the Judiciary is the least democratic, the nominations came from Presidents whom were elected by a minority of voters and confirmed by the Senate, using a minority of the voting populace of the country (because, slavery essentially)

It's awful all around.
And several crypto exchanges/lenders have totally collapsed or rug pulled in the last 10 years. Trusting crypto is not "trusting ECDSA and Schnorr" any more than you would be trusting the bank to use those same algorithms, you still are trusting an entire ecosystem of known bad actors. Do you really think those banks that confiscated funds don't encrypt their traffic?
The video goes along with what you might assume of a hovercraft: that you're calmly floating to your destination on a cushion of air, like a flying carpet from a fairy tale.

In reality they were super loud and everything vibrated, the entire time. Not so much flying carpet, more like getting strapped to the outside of an airplane.
>"especially when it's already the law of the land?"

I believe Roe was the precedent of the land and not something explicitly codified into federal law.
In Germany it's pretty straightforward. If you have a job offer as a software engineer, have a related degree and earn over a threshold which most experienced candidates will meet, you automatically get a so called "Blue Card" work visa which has some benefits over a normal work visa. If you lack a related degree or don't meet the salary threshold you have to get a normal work visa which requires evidence that no suitable EU citizen was available to take the job, but this is highly likely to be approved.

There are no quotas or waiting lists, and you do not have to be "sponsored".
At least there was a password lol
Forget 3-1, what about 65-1?

Legislation needs to pass both Senate and the House, and in the senate, someone from a state like Wyoming has 65x more voting power than someone living in California.
I think this goes to the fact that we need a new sort of UID. Something thought through very carefully rather that something that comes to be. There's a sort of hidden infrastructure, hidden legacy, hidden stability that's been built around phone numbers and email. For instance, "valid Google email address" is a proxy for "a real person with X likelihood". Same goes for SSN + demonstrated knowledge of your last few residences, etc etc. It's a mess.

Start from first principles, what do we really need to know about a person? What could we build? On the other hand, maybe if it's too good it'll be bad for privacy, and escaping into the shadows, should that become necessary for someone.
erections have consequences
Very possibly, but there's no way to know without further research. It's a failure of the author to just skip over what actually went wrong.
True, but at least you need an SMS-capable number only once (to sign up), and not every time you are trying to authenticate to some "secure" website.
Their response would be that it isn’t that simple. That baker in Colorado (I think it was Colorado?) who refused to make a cake for a gay wedding was sued. Republicans see this and say that it isn’t as simple as not participating in an action since you will still be forced to do things against your conscience.
If you have European ancestry you may quality for citizenship (check back at least three generations).

If you were born in Ibero-America (former Spanish and Portugese colonies including Puerto Rico) you can gain citizenship of Spain with two years of residence.
From an outsider's perspective, they do seem to still be popular in Java land.
I'm about to bring you a chicken, do you consider HeLa cells to be a human life?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henrietta_Lacks

> It's hardliners on both sides who are doing the most fighting because they either think that it's okay to abort up to the point of birth or that terminating a bunch of cells is murder.

The pro-life hardliners are the ones currently overturning super-precedents and creating trigger laws in red states. This isn't hypothetical, it's going to cause real harm to poor women and poor children.

Again, all these decisions are being made by pro-life hardliners aren't even willing to have a discussion AT ALL, many even believe that contraceptives are "killing babies". There's no basis behind their beliefs other than the bible. Most couldn't even tell you the stages of fetal development.
Halfway through reading this article I got a SMS from a New York City number saying:

Your package delivery details are incorrect and we cannot deliver. https://usppagestrport.com/2vlv

Obvious phishing attack, but you know some people are going to fall for it.
So many words to describe a simple issue of using reference to out of scope data. Anyways I am using C++ a lot and this types of bugs are easily caught by analyzers or straight up by modern IDEs like CLion (you get a warning).
Thomas’s concurrence specifically says those precedents should be revisited.
A relatively small portion (under 30%, IIRC), and most of those don’t actually oppose abortion qua abortion, they just don’t want Those People to have access to it. (Many vocal opponents to abortion rights have quietly sought abortions on their family’s or mistresses behalf.)
I’d like to engage, but I’m unsure what your point is.

Adding exceptions is antithetical to the belief it is murder. One does not get to murder another person because they were a child of incest. On the other hand, not adding an exception for abortion is monstrous.

If you agree that forcing a woman to give birth to a child of rape or incest is monstrous, then maybe you’ll agree abortion isn’t murder. If you think it’s not monstrous, I hope it never happens to you or someone you love just to be taught a hard lesson in empathy for others.

I’m unsure why you’re quoting the definition of a legally induced abortion and why you feel it important to your argument.
So you focused on a fraction of a percent of abortion cases rather than the overwhelming majority that happen because the mother and/or father couldn't be bothered to have safe sex. I explicitly said in my comment lets talk about the majority. Marijuana causes some fraction of a percent of the population to go into a temporary psychosis, that doesn't mean it should be illegal.

Why do you single out 18 year old white boys specifically? Was there a law that restricted 18 year old white men from purchasing guns that got shot down? If so, good. That's sexist and racist.
> I also have to wonder how Google Voice has survived Google's ax all these years.

The infinite surveillance capacity of an monitored voice line?

Millennia of training data for AI speech synthesis and recognition?
Compelled paternity isn’t a matter of bodily autonomy

Child support isn’t a matter of bodily autonomy.

Both of those apply to both men and women.

The law can theoretically compel everyone to be vaccinated, not just men.
That’s equal protection under the law. It’s also only available in public health crises - not routine.

Again sterilization has been applied to men and women.

Selective service is maybe the only analog to forced birth, and even that has carve outs for religious and moral beliefs.
Bottom line up front: When sending tokens via SMS, you must include a "do not share this token with anyone besides X.com" text. Otherwise account takeovers become trivial.

The article's attack is relatively benign - the user simply goes to a website. Sure they may end up putting info in that website, but probably not. Plus existing systems for malicious website filtering can kick in to prevent this.

The more concerning attack is the social engineering one where a third party says something like "let me 'verify' your identity, I'll send you a number tell me what it is" then triggers an identity verification request on the domain (this can be done either manually or part of a sign up flow for some honeypot service). Now the target needs only relay 6 digits to someone they already "trust" and are in a conversation with, versus in the article's example they needed to put their full account info into an unknown website.
Thanks, I like this. I also find it insanely hypocritical that "these people" want children born no matter the cost, but once they are born they are left to fend for themselves. The same people advocating for illegal abortion are often advocating for stripping services that would help single mothers. Most are not actually interested in the welfare of children, but in moral grandstanding and exercising control over the bodies of "sluts."
If you need a demigod and a book of fiction to tell you not to lie, cheat and kill then you aren't a very good person underneath.

Morality and ethics are not the exclusive purview of Christianity, or even religion in general. Atheists and agnostics don't need a bible to tell right from wrong.

In fact, religion is often used as an excuse to subjugate others, which is what they're doing by overturning RvW. They are subjugating women of breeding age as baby factories and unpaid child minders whose life course is decided on whether a man ejaculates in her and fertilizes an egg or not (whether she wanted him to or not.) If she catches, her life is no longer hers. It now belongs to the state as a incubation vessel for a potential citizen, and her wishes are now unimportant.
> group metrics over a session

How is that something that is essential to providing a service?

I suppose that it's somehow "commercially advantageous", but there are many other commercially advantageous techniques that are simply illegal - such as taking a customer's money, but supplying zero in exchange.

A company's profit needs are not an end-run around consumer protection laws (which is what GDPR amounts to).
The filibuster is basically an imaginary rule that can be changed or modified by a simple majority at any time. It’s irrelevant.
These are the same people who think the world is 6000 years old, the first man was made out of mud and the first woman was made from the rib of the first man. They're clearly insane so their view of forward should be thrown in the garbage.
The urban vs. rural thing is so extreme I really feel like more effort needs to be put into understanding it. There really are no red states or blue states. There are states with more urbanized populations that tilt blue and states with more rural populations that tilt red. There are very few exceptions.
There's no way to interpret the Constitution without "inventing rights" since time moves forward. The founders knew we had progress so they built in ways of accounting for that such as the 9th amendment. The problem only comes when people ignore progress and ignore the parts of the Constitution they don't agree with to dismantle rights they don't like.
I really like nice sportswear due to the materials, they’re just comfortable to wear. Unfortunately everything seems to require a Nike or Adidas logo somewhere on the clothing. I don’t even play sports! Anyone have recommendations for similar clothing but without the logos?
A vote to prohibit women from voting isn’t analogous because it’s restrictive, not permissive.

There is zero legitimate reason for this to be reversed now, compared to after it’s been codified in the legislature.

But all of this is a silly distraction. The real reason has nothing at all to do with what the court’s role should be, and everything to do with the religion of the people currently serving on the court.

To keep the tech analogies going, it’s like a new tech lead deleting the web app code because be doesn’t believe in monorepos, but saying it’s a security issue.
I think my favorite line of the article was knowing when to quit is its own kind of skill.

Shuttering my startup last year, I felt this one. I think I quit six months later than I should have. Knowing when to quit is difficult...especially when you think others are depending on you. I applaud this team for leaning into that instinct.
Were they richer before the invention of the PC?

Not saying everything is fine. But seriously, that's not the fault of the technology.
Thank you for spelling out the facts. I don't think a lot of people realized what was really going on with all this May Issue nonsense. It was pure corruption, and completely antithetical to the Constitution.

I personally believe that Constitutional/permitless carry is the only way it should be, but getting rid of May Issue is a great step in the right direction.
That edit is a nice but ultimately impotent statement.

What matters is the mechanics of how we're in this situation. They're complicated and thankfully this decision doesn't mean an outright ban for all Americans. Providing access for the rest is what should be discussed, over shaking fists and platitudes.
It’s not explicitly enumerated more than anything else we’re talking about. It’s always up to interpretation. Does the constitution say where to draw line between me bearing a knife and a nuke? Nope, ‘arms’ is defined conveniently in the eyes of whoever’s in power when this is decided. That’s how all of this works!
Supreme court rulings are law in this country because of Marbury v. Madison. You can try to claim precedent and law are somehow different, I think you'd have an incredibly hard time convincing most people.
As the novelty of trolling these bills with PRs dies down, I can see this being really useful.

Imagine more bills getting collaboration from the public this way. Rather than calling/writing your local rep, you submit a PR/issue and get feedback quickly!

IMO this is a brilliant move.
Fine, you want another example of systemic bias in our government? The 50 Democratic senators represent 41.5 million more people than the 50 Republican senators.
Original author of the post here. I'm also a Blink API OWNER, so can happily report that Container Queries have 3 LGTMs and will ship in Chromium browsers very shortly, likely 105 (shipping to Stable in September):

https://chromestatus.com/feature/6525308435955712

Subgrid is progressing thanks to engineering from the Edge team, and I expect it to land this year.
Windows 95 simulation on the Sega Genesis
New Windows 95-like experience is out today for the Sega Genesis, available as a free ROM file here:

https://mikeyeldey.itch.io/mikeyeldey95
Lands end has decent stuff imo. I like their "tailored fit" super-t. Some of the colors are bad but they fit me well I think. I don't know if their pants are any good. I just get Levis.
Sure, in the 50s and 60s. Toyota took over a long time ago.
European countries have stricter abortion laws than Roe/Casey allowed.
This is just scaremongering for funding. Nobody is trying to ban interracial marriage.

Roe v Wade was controversial since it was decided. It was never settled precedent. People have tried to overturn it from the start.
One thing I have been thinking more on lately is just that. Why are we so attached to geographic representation, why does a congressional district, or even a state need to be a continuous polygon on a map.

Why cant we break representation to be based on something else. I dont know what, and the simple answer it well geography is the easiest way but easy it often not the best
> If the voting majority truly cares about access to abortion then we will hopefully see enough democratic traction to give them the mandate needed.

I’m sorry but this feels entirely divorced from reality. The nature of the senate, the continued erosion of voting rights… we’re not going to see democratic traction in a system that actively opposes it.
The only education in this thread that I would like to distill onto the rural populations is that Freedom of Choice does not take away your ability to have babies on whatever terms you want, nor does it remove your ability form a community with like minded people where abortions are frowned upon and everyone agrees not to get them and anyone who does is exiled from the community.

It does however mean someone has the right to choose whether or not they want to be a part of your community, and takes away your ability to use state and federal resources to enforce your choice as being more important than someone else's choice.
This is pretty common, unfortunately (and a major factor in choosing a service provider for me when there are multiple options).
> Enable Terminal secure keyboard entry

> Why? To prevent other apps from snooping on what you type.

> How? Go to Terminal.app > Menu bar > Terminal, click “Secure Keyboard Entry”.

I wasn’t aware of this setting. Seems like it should be enabled by default.
>Republicans have won the national popular vote once in the last 8 presidential elections.

You mean Democrats.
Yeah, it's a bunch of humans with opinions.
I enjoyed GP is talking about hyperpolarization, and you come in saying that it’s all a conservative issue, using an “Atlantic” article as your source.
How is this anything other than wishful thinking?
Fwiw Roe was not precedent for griswold, griswold was the precedent for roe.

More generally griswold was one of the landmark decisions at the core of finding a (non-enumerated) constitutional right to privacy.
Many places including the US "confiscate" untouched bank funds as part of a common law process which allows people to recover money from accounts which they are no longer able to access. If you're referring to Cyrpus, only people with more than 100k euros in cash had money taxed, and even then the tax rate was only 47.5% - much lower than the losses many people experience while holding money in crypto.
I run a personal Mattermost server for family communication; its been great. If there was one complaint, and this is a nitpick, it is that the notification icon in Windows does not have enough contrast with the icon when no new messages are available.
I think we just have different definitions of "inventing rights" because I pretty much agree with everything else you said.
For a regular user the “petty actors” as you call them are actually scarier. Who wants to have their hard disk encrypted and pay $$$.

The “actually scary stuff” is extremely important, should definitely worked on and improved. It’s important to advocate for that and educate the common user.

But in my opinion for the regular user, this is not an immediate problem.
I've been in managerial role for a while now, so I can appreciate the "other side", as a recruiter/interviewer. It's hard because you're having to make judgement calls with very limited information, so I can easily empathize.

But as a recruiter or boss, the onus is on me to suss out the data I need. Given that introverted people have always existed and will always exist, it would be ignorant and lazy of me to only pick from the crop that puts themselves in the spotlight for me. Not to mention the very obvious fact that a lot of people are very good at selling themselves, even when they have nothing to offer.
If the assumption is made that abortion supporting companies were already donating to the left that would have opposite effect by empowering the right. To be effective would need to change positions/donations of right donating businesses
The parent isn't wrong. Republicans don't do shit to support "the born" who are ill or live in crushing poverty, they don't give a shit about people, they give a shit about power and this is a lever they've been yanking on to get it for years.
Profiting from inefficiencies in the crypto markets: funding rates
One of the things I love about the Economist is they do this. Also when mentioning companies: Tesla (a car company).
During the 111th Congress, from the appointment of Al Franken until the death of Ted Kennedy, as well as during the term of his appointed successor Paul G. Kirk, the Democratic party held 58 seats in the Senate and caucused together with 2 more senators.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/111th_United_States_Congress "gave the Senate Democratic caucus sixty votes, enough to defeat a filibuster in a party-line vote."

https://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/01/us/politics/01minnesota.h... "providing Democrats with something they had long hoped for: 60 votes, and thus at least the symbolic ability to overcome filibusters."
Oh yes I do. Best one ever is the https://yabs.io which is kind of like good-old-declicio.us
If Congress manages to pass a compromise, then SCOTUS can rule on its constitutionality. (But, I agree with you.)