skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Companies use it as a cheap and easy way to combat spam without any engineering on their end. It's purely out of financial interest, nothing more. The mobile apps which require a phone number to use are doing this because if they only required email to sign up they'd have people sniffing their API and very quickly overwhelming it with fake accounts, and the cat and mouse game begins.

By forcing the users to validate with a phone number, they're essentially pushing their spam problems upstream and out of their hands. More sophisticated actors know it's possible to automate SMS verification, but it does stop a lot of spam at the door.
Democrats control the House, Senate and Presidency. That's hardly one-sided.
None of your analogies are applicable. Somebody dying because their personal circumstances made receiving medical care difficult or impossible, is patently different than dying because someone else was allowed to deny them medical care by imposing their personal religious beliefs.
You still need to extract the right components and abstractions.

And inheritance can be expressed in terms of composition, the base class(es) can be represented as composition and delegation instead (with a protected interface, a public interface and the implementation details all tightly coupled behind a single name which is what really makes it so poor).
There are a lot of interesting phenomena for stargazer in our lifetime but I can't see lots of them so far because:
1. Cloudy skies
2. Rainy days
3. Light pollutions
This is such a nonsense talking point. No right that you have compels any other private citizen to do anything. You do, however, have plenty of rights that prevent people from doing things to you. And no, you don't get twist it around and say that people have to do something to prevent them from doing something to you. Sorry.
It’s because there was a series of scientific papers that pointed very strongly to a zoonotic origin: https://mobile.twitter.com/angie_rasmussen/status/1499406148...
This was the first microprocessor I programmed.

My kit was for the school I was in. It was an STD Bus-based card, nailed onto a piece of wood, with a hex keypad/display.

The card had 256 whole bytes of RAM.

We programmed it in machine code.
You're obligated to follow a law because if you don't someone will hit you with you a stick, kidnap you, and lock you in a tiny room. You're right that governments don't have "rights." They have abilities.
Presumably it's based on the ONS estimates.
It's a weird self-defense argument when the reason the child exists at all is because the mother and some dude brought it into existence in the first place. That seems a key piece the metaphor should include.
Mine would be a cron for "buying" free Kindle books for specific languages that I can read. Now I have more than 100K useless books in my Amazon account that I'm never going to read.
SB-8 helped create a framework for bypassing constitutional “rights” and I think it’s time that California, with its direct democracy, bans guns altogether.
When the first sentence is factually incorrect, it's tough to read on.
The UK doesn't have 200k cases a day, it's less than a tenth of that.
> In return you gain convenience and the security of something backed by the US government.

Crypto holdings in Coinbase are backed by the US government? By what mechanism?
But the comment seems to go on to say it's not nonsense.
> With all the new trials and customers, and an increase in larger websites trying our service, Plausible became much slower to use. (...) We moved from our PostgreSQL database to ClickHouse

Had the impression they were monitoring up to a couple hundred websites at that time. Probably small ones.

I'm surprised Postgres was slowing them down. Maybe the queries or the database were not well optimized?
> I hope and pray that "you are not far from the Kingdom of God" could very well be said of you.

Personally, I hope to get as far away from "The Kingdom of God" as I can.

Why? Because ideas that I don't believe in like "soul" and "sin" are being used to oppress me in the name of that very Kingdom.

Being genuine is not enough. This is about life and death.

Living breathing thinking feeling loving hoping yearning people are going to endure pain and even death because of this ruling.

All because people like you believe so strongly in a modern interpretation of an ancient collection of novels that don't even say what they have interpreted.

> As to "life", "breath", "personhood", "ensoulment", and "birth" - how deep do you want to go?

To me, it's not so much about the distance as the journey. I would rather live a short life in liberty than a long one in oppression.

How far do you, and the rest of the conservative Christians behind this decision, want to push us? How far will be bend to your collective whims?

Today, the answer is clearly, "Too far."
I almost lost my wife due to the Catholic Hospital's policy against D&C procedures. Had the OBGYN not put his career on the line, and over-riding the prohibition on the procedure, she would have died. Now that same hurdle can become risking prison.

A few years later, we were blessed with a child who is doing well. I would have neither if not for Roe v. Wade.

This isn't about abortion, it's about denying healthcare!
Arguments like this don't win the hearts and minds of people (maybe not your intent). Calling fetuses/babies parasites may sound to you like a clever analogy but to most other people it just sounds crass.
Consentual sex happens, leading to accidental pregnancy. Now the girl's family is incentivised to claim rape so she can get an abortion.
In certain circumstances you are much more likely to be meeting with wealthy people. In those cases, perhaps clothing that gives a bad impression on average will actually give a good impression.
Should your family pay you to cook, or did you actually cook for them because you like it.
How does the story about the origin of sin work without a primordial Adam and Eve?
Actually, the way you are framing it is a significant cause of the problem. In many cases, we are talking about a strictly amoral health care concern, IE: a clump of cells that are going to kill a woman if she doesn't get the necessary health care. It has absolutely nothing to do with a baby or life and everything to do with her bleeding out. THAT is the thing the right-wing ignores and wants you to ignore too. So they show you pictures of babies, they talk about babies, they come up with fictitious terms like "third-trimester abortion" because it's the only way they can frame the issue to rile up their base.
My issue is that some apps take a while to start. While waiting, I go to do something else and then get brought back when the app finally decides to wake up. Apps being able to steal focus from a system password entry dialog is pure incompetence IMO.

Fun side note: apps can steal focus from the lock screen password entry too (maybe this one has been fixed). Made it "fun" to log into locked screens while CI spawned dozens of windows in the background.
Still feels more intelligent then the average doctor visit these days in the US. Painting a country with the same brush overlooks the fact that some professions aren’t sent the best and brightest, depending on country.
It’s far closer to the truth than you are willing to admit.

Ransomware is primarily enabled by encrypting your files. How they take payment is irrelevant. No encryption (eg: a universe where AES, RSA, ECEIS is broken), no ransomware.

My position is the fallout of ransomware is enabled by people failing to take backups.
That is patently absurd. Consent to sexual intercourse is not consent to pregnancy, especially if contraceptives were used and failed.

At the risk of stretching the metaphor to its breaking point, this is you choosing to go out and get drunk while aware that members of an unethical music lovers' organization are skulking about looking for victims to graft sick violinists onto. Sure, they no longer need to actively drug you because you willingly did that yourself, but that doesn't imply your consent to what happens next.
Why are you leaving your crypto on an exchange wallet? There's something called counterparty risk, that these crypto folks need to read up on.
Why is there such a large difference in salary? Is it exclusive to software?
Well then we mostly agree. I’ve just been trying to draw consistent lines through an inconsistent system. I believe the system should be consistent, and I believe that there is no consistent system that men could live with that would also include banned abortion.
Late binding polymorphism and encapsulation are both very important concepts but there's no particular reason that your unit of inheritance should be your unit of polymorphism, often the boundaries should be drawn differently. And inheritance is just a way of achieving code re-use that tends to make suboptimal tradeoffs between flexibility and DRY.

There's a certain conceptual and implementation elegance to OoO so I understand why it became popular. But in practice all the new languages moving away from it are doing so for good reason.
Titans of Tech
Once you can prove that you own a digital asset, so what? What do you do with that other than speculation?
It’s literally a hypothesis. It’s in the name.
Modeling a devastating childhood disease on a chip
HNrs, what are your thoughts on this? Opinions are law-abiding citizens should be able to protect themselves versus surge in gun violence by criminals possessing guns.
When you find yourself explaining an ordinary biological process, especially one that millions of people regard as wondrous and miraculous, in this manner, does it not inspire you to take any sort of pause and wonder if you're engaging in a kind of special pleading? Intellectually and emotionally, is this really how you want to characterize pregnancy? I think one should be careful not to arrive at monstrous conclusions in service of political ends.
"static" was more of the server side requirements than if it's interactive or not. like "static" sites that can be hosted serverless from an S3 bucket.
> Reviews were mostly bad — in both senses of the word. That is to say, they were highly critical and inaccurate. In some cases, the authors said things that made clear they had not read the book but had made up their minds to dislike it. Not one but two virologists told us on Twitter that the book was full of lies — and that they had not read it. An odd thing for anybody to admit to, especially a scientist.

If you call yourself a "scientist" you have an ethical duty to follow the evidence wherever it leads. Perhaps not in the formal sense of a doctor's Hippocratic oath, but in the tradition of Galileo and Copernicus.
Elon Musk says Tesla's AI humanoid robot 'Optimus' will be ready in Three Months
I don't have a specific best-practice answer but you could invoke a back-end method which fetches the AWS credentials from Secrets Manager (using a baked-in access key), thereby hiding them from the front-end?

Worth taking a look at the AWS WAF (Well-Architected Framework) as this will give you some AWS-approved architecture ideas.
Then you, by definition, are not ordinary.

The average person is impacted by capitalist market economy shenanigans on a continuous basis on nearly everything required to stay alive.
Sure, and we need a federal law clarifying this to protect us against selective court interpretations of the 14th amendment, on that much we are in agreement. But that’s not what this decision is about, it is no coincidence that there are trigger laws across the country in anticipation of this, that even attempt to ban abortions in other states (the Texas law). States rights has long been the motte of all kinds of minority social opinions in the Bailey. The broad consensus is being held hostage by a minority
in some state legislatures, and in the senate and now Supreme Court. By any measure the functioning of the government is divorced from the will of the majority and this is a symptom of that. To celebrate it as returning powers to a democratic process is a crazy distraction to me in light of that.
>Our militia has since been regulated into the national guard.

The national guard is controlled by the government, it's not a militia. The last 20+ years or so it's pretty much regular army.

Along a similar line, do you think a free press would be free if the government was the one who decided who was press and who wasn't?
The client could in theory see the javascript running and detect this.
The formal proofs aren't in a Hacker News comment; just go read game theory research papers. For example, https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~noamb/papers/17-NIPS-Safe.pdf

Or go try and solve a moderately complicated anything without allowing yourself abstractions with error. I won't wait on you, because your solutions will never terminate in my lifetime for even things as simple as chess which is a hell of a lot simpler than reality.
> The equal protection clause extends that right to your own body to women

No it doesn't

Here's the clause:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

Where is a guaranteed right to abortion in this? You said Roe "is fairly sound constitutional reasoning", but I don't see you reading a Roe from this without some serious mental gymnastics

Also:

> Note that a man is not required to donate blood to save an adult human, even if there is no risk to him. The equal protection clause extends that right to your own body to women, and that is fairly sound constitutional reasoning.

Donating blood != killing a fetus

If you consider equating the two "fairly sound constitutional reasoning" then that speaks for itself
What it means though is that the people doing the work are often doing it due to power tripping, political axe grinding or outright being paid by other organizations to astroturf their viewpoints.

Nothing is actually "free" and reddit isn't getting free moderation, there's a cost to that which shows up in the quality of the moderation.

It is sort of similar to the aphorism that if the product is "free" that you are really the product. The moderation (at least on large subreddits) comes at a cost, it just isn't a direct financial cost that reddit pays.
The US Federal constitution contains a right to bear arms, which supersedes the NYC law which stated ordinary citizens could not "bear arms" in public without justifying an exceptional need.

There is no analogous constitutional right for abortion. Roe v. Wade inferred it from a "right to privacy", which also does not exist in the text.
> there's freedom of movement between states

If you have money, or a network of help, and a safe home situation...

It's easy to say "everyone in a regressive state should move". It's easy to say "everyone in a regressive country should move". Not everyone has that option as readily available as you might imagine.
I don't see this really having any impact on voting patterns. Voting demographics are largely over-determined.

Republicans lost in 92 because of the "economy stupid" and, after sixteen years of incumbency, the pendulum swung to "throw the bums out." They were trotting out "Family Values" when people had actual concerns about their material conditions as we were in a relatively minor recession.
If he was to apply a logical framework to his reasoning then overturning Obergefell would mean also overturning Loving and dissolving his own marriage.

But he isn't particularly interested in that, because he is a political hack.

Thankfully, he is at least wrong about Obergefell, which was decided on different, and much firmer, grounds than the right-to-privacy cases. But carrying out the logic from this decision to others does indeed threaten Griswold and Lawrence, and especially Griswold, which was basically the direct precedential precursor to Roe.
That is a consequence of Congress not doing its job on this topic for 50 consecutive years.

Contact your state and Congressional representations and find legislative candidates that are as passionate on this topic as you are, if there arent other causes you are more passionate about that different candidates care about of course.
Is the "finite connections" thing even a thing any more?

As far as I understand things, HTTP/2 kinda solved that problem (within reason) and you don't have to worry about combining JavaScript and CSS and images etc into giant bundled files so much any more?
>(records)

there are

>- List comprehensions

Enumerable.Range?

>- Custom operators (used sparingly for building DSLs)

Could you please show what kind of DSL you'd want to write?
A claim by a lay philosopher that something has been infallibly taught is not the same as an actual infallible teaching, and if you even casually follow Catholic debates, you will find a lot of conflicting claims about what has an has not been infallibly taught.

Arguably, the most these writings about what has been implicitly infallibly taught and therefore cannot be changed by a Pope despite the absence of an explicit dogma tell you is what the author is very concerned that there is an insufficient commitment to among the heirarchy and probably a risk of imminent change by a Pope, which the author is lobbying against.

(Or, as in this case, what has recently been actually changed by a Pope that the author wishes everyone to pretend has not.)
Here are a car and a motorcycle each with three wheels:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliant_Robin

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piaggio_MP3

What shall we do with them in our class hierarchy?
>> problems that are not a function of raw work hours, but rather require dealing with ambiguity (“Difficult Problems”)

> work that is easy, ambigous, but just uses up a ton of mental space to work through that mushy ambiguity

Am I missing something here? Because I read your third category as being exactly this second category. Or maybe it's halfway between categories one and two?

Solving ambiguity, and probably lots of it, is the difficulty. Easy but ambiguous is generally not a combination I see.

I frequently tell my manager/team that we have two kinds of problems: easy ones that just take a lot of work/time to slog through and difficult ones that may not be much actual work except for figuring it out.

Like, many hikes are just a whole lot of one-foot-after-another. But mountaineering is sometimes a short distance of don't-fuck-up-or-you-die.
Democracy is great but hundreds of thousands of the impacted can't vote.
That why a lot of people bankside outside the US will refuse to accept US customers. The reporting obligation is only applicable if they have US customers.
People are real salty here. Yeah, being a walking billboard is pretty silly, but what if we like the way the logo looks? There's a reason The Misfits are more successful with merch than music: because people like to wear stuff with awesome skulls on it. Take your designer nonsense and give me cool logos any day.
WHen I built this I thought there was a fancy algorithm that I could use to improve the quality of the drawing.. but no, the SG90 servos are hopelessly crap.
I think I have not made my explanation clear to you, because what you have written, and should not have felt compelled to write, supports what I'm saying. I'm saying that abortion will cease to be an issue when we can, technologically, end the pregnancy without terminating the unborn life, avoiding exactly the situation you describe. I'm very sorry that your wife had to experience what she did.
> Rather than calling/writing your local rep, you submit a PR/issue and get feedback quickly!

Learning git well enough to be effective is likely to present some challenges for a lot of the population. It's hard enough for IT people that don't have version control experience in their background. ;)
Generally, brain and neural system complexity is seemed to be necessary for personhood. During fetal development, the evolutionary older parts forms earlier, while cerebral cortex starts to develop at the end.
First of all, as others have pointed out, laws that prohibit abortion even in cases of rape and incest overlook the "choosing to take action" part. In that case, a person is pregnant without ever having made a choice to engage in any action at all.

Moreover, "living thing" is the key word here. A fetus IS a living thing. So is a cow, a cockroach, an intestinal parasite. We kill those, and we support industries that kill them, without thinking. And while there are extremists who support protecting a broader segment of "life," that is not what the pro-life movement is about. If I breed cows for a living, I have a legal and ethical right to kill those cows. And if I have a baby attached to my uterus, I should have the legal right to do what I want.
Which is literally a bias against democracy.

States are not fixed entities. It's people that should be represented, not an arbitrary geographic boundary.

That intentional design makes it so depending on where you physically live, your vote is worth many times less or more than someone else's. That makes no sense.
>more grass and trees and less concrete

I would challenge the degree to which contemporary suburban sprawl developments actually deliver on this promise: wander around any of them, your field of view is going to be dominated by a wide road making a sweeping curve, huge driveways, imposing garage doors, and (maybe, if any houses are visible behind the garages) giant masses of vinyl siding. There's at least as much inorganic material in the vista as in any Manhattan streetscape, it's just the ugly and utilitarian kind, designed to facilitate efficient through-travel and car storage instead of something designed to be pleasant or inviting to people in itself.

You can have a nice patch of nature privately in your backyard, and perhaps in dedicated parks and preserves, but the connective tissue between all that stuff is remarkably hostile to any mode of engagement besides passing through at speed.
To use your example, you can't demand I give you a kidney, but once you have it (and assuming you immediately die without it), I can't take it back.

Body autonomy is great and all, but it doesn't excuse murder.

Like I said: I'm not required to save you, but I also can't kill you.
There's a reason access to 3rd trimester abortions enjoys far less support from the public than abortion rights in the abstract—and, in fact, IIRC, Roe and subsequent decisions do not guarantee any kind of right to 3rd-trimester abortions, which is why states have been able to restrict abortion access for late-term pregnancies, despite Roe.
Email based authentication is lame. If a hacker gets access to your email, then they automatically have access to your 2FA. Lame.
I disagree, without taking a side in the debate. If someone truly and really believes a fetus is a human then they do have an interest in protecting them.

Its like being against slavery. You could say, what's that to anyone, if you're against slavery then dont own slaves but don't stop others. And yet it's reasonable to be against other people enslaving others.

Your comment suggests you think abortion is "obviously" ok and perhaps you'd agree that slavery is "obviously wrong and different". Perhaps because enslaved people are "obviously" humans with rights and fetuses are "obviously" not. I don't know of course but it seems like a reasonable guess.

But so long as the debate is about what people hold as obvious and naturally correct, all you get is more polarisation.
The people who passed the laws know damned well what they are banning. They are intentionally and explicitly banning the procedures by name. Medical professionals and the people these would affect pointed out to them the impact of banning the procedures. They don't care, they passed the laws anyway.
WTF Is Happening on Discord?: My Journey Through 5 Crypto Servers