skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I just started using Vite, and completely agree. I haven't explored it much but it's super fast so far. Like literally just a few minutes ago, I decided that I wanted a multi-page app instead of an SPA. Took me 5 minutes, didn't need to set up any additional entry points or chunks or anything. Fantastic.
You're welcome to use a "do whatever you want" license on your code, and people should respect that. (Though even those licenses tend to require attribution, and copilot doesn't do even that.)

Other people use licenses that try to create a commons where if you want to use it you need to share your own code, as a counterpoint to the non-commons in which you can't use code at all. And if people use those licenses, they should be respected as well.

By all means, eliminate copyright, and let all code be copied freely. And until that happens, as long as proprietary code exists and doesn't let anyone copy it, respect copyleft licenses as well.
Honestly, this isn't a bad idea.

The big problem with using sha1/md5 in non-secure contexts is:

*Someone later might think its secure and rely on that when extending the system.

*it can make it difficult for security people to audit code later as you have to figure out if each usage is security critical

Using a non crypto hash makes both those concerns go away since everyone knows crc32 is insecure. The alternative of using sha256 also works (performance wise it is close enough, so why not just use the secure one and be done with it.)
This "depth slider" is called the Inverted Pyramid [0]. The first paragraph has the main information (aka tl;dr). The next the secondary points. And as a reader, you just have to keep reading as you want more details. You know the next few paragraphs don't have more important information than what you've already read.

That's how the print media wrote their articles. They've already sold the paper/magazine to you, so now the goal was to make you feel like you have as much information as you would like with as little effort as possible, so you're willing to buy the next issue.

Nowadays, with the attention economy, the writing style has changed. The main objective is to keep the user reading for as long as possible.

[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_pyramid_(journalism)
As of today there is a new one...

"Now in Preview – Amazon CodeWhisperer"

https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/now-in-preview-amazon-codew...
I'm not sure using a different license actually opts you out. By merely hosting your code on GitHub you grant them the right to analyze your code on their servers[1]

They may be morally in the wrong, but I'm unsure they are legally in the wrong here. To boot, denying them the right to create this tool in your license is technically a violation of OSS principles and problematic

[1]: https://docs.github.com/en/site-policy/github-terms/github-t...
That doesn’t work. It doesn’t work like that. That wasn’t my point.

My point is it’s like Goldilocks and the three bears minus the middle bear. The soup is either too hot or too cold. It used to be one extreme, now it’s the other. There is no just right.
You are describing mmt which has been thoroughly rebuffed by mainstream economists. https://www.igmchicago.org/surveys/modern-monetary-theory/
Can one family not raise both healthy introvert and extrovert children?
Well, if a parent is unwilling, then no …

But if they are willing?
When union plants are shuttered in favor of non-union plants, did they earn that too? Or does this logic only apply in one direction?
> "As I mentioned earlier, we trained (and continue to train) CodeWhisperer on billions of lines of code drawn from open source repositories, internal Amazon repositories, API documentation, and forums."

The really interesting thing about this is the implication that Amazon's beefy legal department has come to the same conclusion as Microsoft's similarly beefy legal department: that using publicly accessible but not necessarily permissively licensed code to train Codewhisperer/CoPilot to spit out code is defensible in court.
For some types of bookmarks I started to use a GitHub repositories with a markdown document in them. Those are my bookmarks collected mainly through HN:

- A list of freely available articles, tutorials, book about programming, math and science: https://github.com/bobeff/programming-math-science

- A list of open source games: https://github.com/bobeff/open-source-games
Proprietary software is more than willing to use those legal frameworks. Unilaterally disarming while your opponent does not is a losing strategy.

As long as copyright exists, copyleft should be respected.
Indeed, the US supreme court pointedly refused to accept that the purpose clause limits the power of copyright in "Eldred Vs Reno" (at least, that is my understanding as a non lawyer)
Which one comes first? To me it seems like personal autonomy and property rights are at odds with each other. If you own the resources I need to live, I can only choose to die or let you choose for me.

On the other hand I could just take what I want from you, depriving you of your property, and you'd have to figure out how to fight me off. Strongest team wins, 90s Mogadishu style.
M1 Ultra Mac Studio Review
Self-hosting does not automatically make your analytics legal, on the other hand.

Processing of your users' personal data is legal only in the few exceptional scenarios outlined in Article 6.

https://gdprinfo.eu/en-article-6
guess all those juulers will just start smoking cigarettes and dying. i dont understand the logic of allowing one and not the other. in what way has juul marketed to childen?

its popular with teenagers because you can smoke it in a school bathroom without getting caught; its easy to conceal. is that grounds for banning something now? are they just going to ban vaporizers all together then?

seems like an completely illogical reaction to the issue.
"As a subordinate clause; what follows is independent of it." Um... so your argument is that "when the writers of the Constitution explicitly wrote their reasoning for this clause, they didn't actually care if that reason mattered, they just felt like writing more words; and we can ignore half the sentence"? Followed shortly thereafter by lambasting people ignoring the Constitution?

...please tell me you see the irony here...
I have no idea.

The problem is that I think a lot would watch it, go "Yeah, that was bad, but I can think of a simple tweak that will make it amazing!" and then go deploy with "one quick tweak" and discover that, no, it's not that the idea was implemented wrong, it's that the idea is wrong.

There's a weird refusal to consider human nature in the tech industry anymore - unless you're exploiting it to sell more ads.
Not familiar with the specifics of Mark’s case, but a possibly comparable trial of Pavel Pernikaŭ resulted in him being sentenced to 2 years in a penal colony.

Source:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Detention_of_Pavel_Pernikaŭ
The NYTimes has a bad habit of hyperbole like this but in a world where 200 proof alcohol exists and prescription fentanyl is easily accessible it feels pretty well...boomer for lack of a better phrase.

Weed isn't an issue and it never has been.
Yes. Have used for years and pay for https://www.diigo.com/ .

As a service it doesn't appear to be being actively developed, but it is reliable, isn't too fugly and has the required functionallity (multiplatform/browser/mobile support, good search, read later, tags, highlighting, sticky notes, private and public libraries and archiving for important stuff) in a reasonably easy to use form.

diigo's not perfect by any means - automated tagging suggestions could benefit from ML pixie dust - but certainly the best first stage of research and web page archiving solution I've found (compared to DevonThink, Pocket, Evernote, InstaPaper, A's Notes (and a few others I've forgotten))
Around 300 employees moving to new HQ, Citadel will maintain an office in Chicago per Griffin's memo. Just a bit more than Caterpillar moving from their Deerfield HW to Texas (although they’re still keeping production in the suburbs, just as Citadel is keeping a Chicago office).

Looks like this is the result of Griffin’s Republican challenger he was funding losing out in the polls for the upcoming IL gov election, and deciding to move to where his politics are more welcome.

> Griffin’s decision came as Griffin’s favored gubernatorial candidate, Republican Aurora Mayor Richard Irvin, has fallen behind in the polls. Griffin backed Irvin’s bid for the GOP nomination with $50 million. Pritzker is seeking a second term.

My editorial comment: Pritzker is probably the most competent governor IL has seen in a while, and is doing well operating in a deeply challenging environment.

https://therealdeal.com/chicago/2022/06/23/miami-nabs-anothe...
Use the yacy-proxy funktion.
ottime notizie. vietare google e monetizzare le bellissime spiagge, e mangiare pasta autentica.
> Are you implying that the vast majority of consumers aren't concerned with their privacy and would keep using GDPR-compliant websites?

False premise.

Users simply aren't aware, but once they learn about it, they become concerned,

> If that's the case, isn't the regulation somewhat against the spirit of democracy?

That's a really weird argument.

Anyway, that's not the case.
I've also started using an under-the-desk treadmill lately. Agree it's awesome. I have no idea how people get in 10,000 steps or whatever without it. But holy crap you're walking 8-10 miles a day!
Probably would. I get 6 hours of sleep on a good day. I also work about 12 hrs a day. I do make sure to squeeze in a half hour of running most days.
> least not as fast as how they are being shipped.

Could you give some examples of big features from the last 12 months? I can’t think of any big ones off hand. IIRC, just a large number of small improvements.

> The kernel requires stability.

I can’t recall a new Rust release ever breaking existing code. Is this what you’re talking about?

> GCC

Rust will have a GCC backend and/or frontend soon.

> Consistency in applying compile flags and optimizations.

Can’t say much about this but I’m fairly sure the kernel devs won’t let anything be merged until they’re satisfied. We can trust them on this.
As a wise person once said; Drugs are amazing, drugs are so good they will literally ruin your life.
Alternately, download the podcasts or interviews (yt-dlp: https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp) and then watch them with whatever local player you have that allows you to save a partial watch location and return to that point later.
If you own a controlling percentage. Then yes it is. That is how you buy/control a publicly traded company.

You can buy 100% of shares and take it private, but that's overkill for what Microsoft wanted.
I'm not at all saying that they are equivalent, just that they should not be forgotten.
The issue is not at all transparency, if your company once creates a business emergency by firing a significant portion of your customers, there’s really no reason for anyone to trust you.

If you’re doing it for money, you’re either financially weak or just cheap and looking to save cash by making your fired customers reengineer to accommodate a new provider.

The only way you can fire a huge swath of customers like this is to provide them with an essentially unbounded offboarding runway and being willing to grandfather many in, perhaps raising rates after a generous grace period to encourage departure.
The goalpost moved a bit. We now talk about privacy since there is at least something we could potentially accomplish. Fighting big data is impossible, corps are collecting more and more if it and we fall for it. We are giving it away via using free products that appear to be backed by advertising.
That sentence stood out to me, and it's unclear if they mean "shouldn't be blamed for these conditions at all" or "are responsible for some skin conditions, but are unfairly blamed for others".
There are a few reasons why this could be considered ethical. First, open-source code is typically free to use, so the company would not be taking advantage of anyone by using it to train their AI. Second, the company would be providing a service that people are willing to pay for, so they would be generating value for society. Third, the company would be transparent about what they are doing and would not be hiding anything from the public.

...the above was generated by GPT-3 (text-davinci-002). Prompt: Write an argument for why using open-source code to train an AI and then sell the code generating service (without open-sourcing it) is ethical.

The main argument against this is that it takes away from the open-source community that contributed to the development of the code in the first place. By selling a code-generating service without open-sourcing it, the company is profiting from the work of others without contributing back. This is unfair and takes away from the overall open-source ecosystem.

Added two characters to the prompt :P
To play devil's advocate here, there are several things that have or had been "known forever in the fitness industry / community", which are just plain false. "No pain, no gain" is probably the most famous.
> but that is also copyright infringement.

so basically all of Stackoverflow is copyright infringement and has been for decades? Find me the programmer who has never either 1) copied and pasted directly from the internet, or 2) taken an idea found on the internet and massaged it for their own purposes. I mean... this is basically why programming is so lucrative IMHO. Everyone is piggybacking off of everyone else's work (at least in open source)
Privacy improvements will be pulled in along with independent political parties in the next kernel update.
i started writing a travel diary when i got my first portable notebook 20 years ago. (a sony picturebook, small enough to carry around everywhere easily)

initially i only intended to write when i was away from home, but as my life turned into moving to other countries to live and work there, i realized that i should be writing every day.

the main purpose for me is to write down interesting experiences and memories and less about feelings. the same way i take photos. because there is something i want to remember. that means on most days the entries are short, but when something exceptional happens, then i take it down in as much detail as i can.
Suppose I run a website in the us and a user in Italy connects to it. Does this mean I’m now breaking the law serving them the website? My connection logs now have pii.

What if I use a cdn that has points of presence in Italy and still pings my server with a head request and the end user ip?

Am I also now breaking Italian law by using google analytics?
I hope you're getting a good seven figure salary/payoff for all that effort!
I used to use delicious, but after it got bought the Nth time, I went and built my own delicious clone.
> Additionally, imagine why and how someone with an Econ degree who wasn’t very well known became incredibly famous.

Whatever you're implying here, I'm too stupid to get it.

You mean: he became famous enough despite only talking trash but in a way that fools dumb people like me? Or: he became famous through illegitimate means? Or: he became famous purely out of luck? Or: he became famous because he understood how to tell these people who mistrust some official institutions what they want to hear?
Or: something else?

I just think he's got a few points right that go against today's mainstream economics. Somehow I haven't yet heard sound arguments from people who oppose the "deflation is an acceptable and possibly even better state of the economy" notion. They mostly put up strawmen.

> This is a common grift. Several professors in extremely high end Ivy League universities tried the same tactic. Including that one fucktard from MIT who claimed he’d done simulations for a million years and Terra (or some other coin, I really can’t keep all the scams straight in my head) couldn’t fail no matter what. Same motivation. New shiny thing? Let’s use it to try and increase our social capital. Less erudite crowd? The better.

I don't see why this is relevant here at all. The world is full of people trying to come out on top, almost everybody is. And some people tell lies to achieve that, some do scams or criminal stuff. Humans use tactics that "work" with humans, so what?

There's no law of nature from which follows that every person who curiously becomes famous for uncertain reasons can only be telling stupid things.

Discussing the person rather than their ideas is IMO a telltale sign that the subject (and gaining new insights about it) isn't really top priority here.
> If they had a reasonable basis for believing they had a license they're in the clear.

False.

If they committed copyright infringement, even if they genuinely believed they weren't, they are not in the clear. They still owe damages.
I'm doing what I love buzzed right now, building a cluster for my homelab, creating a hybrid cloud solution to host some services and saving on money by leveraging cheap compute at home.

But yes, Randy Marsh was absolutely right. I've had periods of my life where I've abused it and I regret every one of those days.
Cryptocurrency Exchange CoinFlex Halts Withdrawals
I don't think there ever was a reluctance to eat asian carp. People don't know or care what kind of fish is in a lot of fish products
Hard to beat Zotero as a bookmarking service IMO. Saves a copy of the article and makes it available through the web interface if you're not at your usual desktop. $20 a year for 2 GB of storage is a good value if you want to go beyond the free plan.
I think the most interesting part about OP’s story is the question about how did self-hosted solution notify Mattermost server about potential Russian/Belarus connection? Even if the compliance automation was faulty, it’s still interesting how Mattermost found out of a Russian connection at all. (I am assuming this compliance email wasn’t sent out to everyone/larger group of people by mistake, and the OP happened to have a Russian user)
I agree that younger talent has been especially underserved by remote working, but simply having an office to optionally go to won't fix that. The young talent will come in, and the older talent will stay home. My company has an office that is optionally attended. I sometimes stop by. It's like a ghost town.
Yup. Pinboard. Maciej's commitment to rigid simplicity and speed has made me a customer for life.
No real progress so far.

I have an interview to switch to a different team in my company. That should cut back on the context switching and allow me to focus on one stack, and mostly UI at that. It will still have the corporate policies and BS like any other team at the company. I'm hoping there's another idea I haven't heard yet. I'll check out those posts. Thanks!
> Why isn't some chipmaker or consortium fronting the $100 million and starting to build the plant now, as a cheap insurance policy to make sure they don't lose billions in revenue if the Ukraine production remains inaccessible for years?

Perhaps because there is a non-zero chance the disruption to the supply of neon will have disappeared long before the plant comes online, cheap supplies will be plentiful again, so they'll have "wasted" the $100 million ... and will have to explain to their investors why they took (with hindsight) such a crazy decision?
Why would you do that? It looks convenient. On Windows 10 my context menu is cluttered with stuff I never use, which is a huge pain in the ass.
At the cost of otherwise disarming a much, much larger segment of the population who have never committed a crime with a firearm and are much better protected against crimes of many various types, including those with firearms.
The Second Amendment doesn't cover weapons of mass destruction, so that's a total strawman argument. The intent of the authors was to cover individual weapons, of the type that a light infantry soldier might carry. (Although up through about the Civil War, it was relatively common for private citizens to own artillery and there were no licenses or permits required.)
Great question, this is something we put a lot of effort into.

For both dates and numerics, we format them in a normalized format, and round them to the lowest mutual precision. It gets even more complicated, because when databases reduce the precision of timestamps, some of them round it, and some of them truncate. We implemented both, and we either truncate or round both timestamps, according to which database has the column with the lower precision.

We haven't got to bytes and strings yet, but it's on our list, and I imagine we'll use a similar approach.

For now, we print a warning whenever we don't have special handling for the column type. If you see a value mismatch where it shouldn't be, let us know and we'll implement it next.
Nope. They forward through an in-between that obscures it. They argue that because search results are personalized, being able to see the search terms can give you information about the visitor that can compromise their privacy. Google doesn't want anybody violating user privacy except for Google.
Excerpt from the MIT license:

> THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED “AS IS”, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.
> The last time I checked, the Google Analytics' Terms of Service explicitly prohibited its use on web sites involving healthcare companies.

You're missing a key part of the sentence you're remembering:

> If you are (or become) a Covered Entity or Business Associate under HIPAA, you may not use Google Analytics for any purpose or in any manner involving Protected Health Information unless you have received prior written consent to such use from Google.

Healthcare companies can absolutely use GA on their websites as long as the website isn't involving PHI or ePHI.
> Do compilers really can never call `free()`?

If a compiler has to be run multiple times in the same process, it may use an area allocator to track all memory, so you can free it all in one go once you're done with compilation. Delaying all freeing until the end effectively eliminates temporal memory issues.
This is a great use case I've found as well. If you have a product that is deployed to K8s, the ability to create clusters on demand for testing, whether local or otherwise, is awesome.
The majority of microprocessors deployed in the world are using neither of these platforms. Some of their developers like having a featureful compiler for them.
lol oh yea, it wasn't "good" but at least for me at the time it was the only option I could find and if you got the settings right it was the best looking one. I was also young so there may have been better solutions out there but I could at least get FRAPs running.
There are plenty of apps to do coding if one so will, with the APIs provided on the platform.

Not everything with a CPU needs to run yet another UNIX clone.

There are plenty of computers and maker boards for that purpose.
Because copilot is violating the terms I put for my code. My code is GPL. It cannot be put into projects with incompatible licenses. That’s my code, and I share it with strings attached. You can’t just copy my code and sell to other parties no strings attached.

If that’s fine and dandy, Microsoft should also train Copilot on their source code repositories, so we can use that knowledge, too.
If we can figure out why this occurs during sleep, maybe we can trick cancer cells into thinking the patients are awake all the time (without actually affecting sleep wellness).
If a modern democracy requires an ever-growing government I think I will stick to Democracy Stable.