skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I sort of suspect you're not here in good faith, but just in case: my impression is that there is a difference between left and right when it comes to empathy, but it's not the amount of empathy per se, it's who benefits from it. The size of the tribe, if you will.

Painting with a broad brush, conservatives show empathy only for people like themselves and perhaps close family and friends or a local community. Progressives show empathy towards a far broader range of people.

(I think it's no accident that cities tend to be more left. They force people to have larger and more heterogenous tribes, and the correlation between political leaning and size of tribe apparently has some power in both directions.)
running short of water does not mean you have nothing to drink, it means famine.

madagascar has terrible famine right now, becauae there is no rain. In Syria, all crops that are not irigated have died.

current irrigation water is free. You cant use water from desalination, because it takes many tons of water to grow one kilo of food, and tens of tons of water to grow a kilo of beef. that would drive up prices more than 10x, which menas famine.

you people just don't understand the shitstirm that's coming one the crops fail on two important crop producing nations simultaneously
I don't think that counts either as 8-bit or as a keyboard. Sure, it outputs 8-bit key codes, but the input is binary. And it has no keys.

It's more like an old-fashioned mainframe console. Pretty, though!
Ask HN: How to Find Interesting Papers?
There's so much published. What approaches work for identifying interesting papers?
Is it really? Who would honestly freely choose that?
Recently switched from a Go shop to Elixir. Ooof, the compilation feels like molasses.
> The idea is that when you are, for example, writing business logic with books, then you want to neatly put the operations on the book near the definition of the book.

That's not the idea. You put the code for the "internals" of a book near to its definition. In other words: The code that needs to see the private/protected members of a class. It is not good OOP - if I may be so bold as to use that phrase - to stick as much functionality as you can involving some class, into that class.
I understood. However this is rather counter productive as it requires more environmentally costly storage as well as solar capacity.
Additionally, it totally neglects all other sources of renewable energy.
The fundamental flaw with this platform is the belief that there is "unbiased" or "uncontroversial" writing. Also, it assumes all other actors are benevolent and not conspiring against those they disagree with or view as their enemies to brigade or otherwise game the platform to their advantage.
I fear that the market will stay irrational for longer than we can remain sane.
> The water is owned by the farmers, not by California

if there is no rain, they have no property. the idea that you can own something beyong laws of physics is amazing. it's like owning thoughts and ideas
Can you expand on what exactly the threat might be? How is a 3D map more dangerous than a 2D map? And these are public spaces, it’s not like it’s some secret information.
Functions that accept dicts are a nightmare to extend and modify.

Compared to what? I see the article's point about dicts being, like everything else in programming, a tradeoff with benefits and limitations. But the article's needless dramatization of a pretty mundane point (and the button-pushing title) are, to these jaded eyes, a definite turn-off.

Meanwhile I'll keep using dicts when the use case calls for them, thank you. As a sibling commenter put it:

If you don't know how the data should be used, it's often a different story.

Exactly. The whole point (and benefit) of dicts is that they're squishy. Sometimes you need squishy.
> Ironically you are now hard-pressed to find a moderator on r/TwoXChromosomes who actually has two X chromosomes.

Pointing this out would get you banned from Reddit extremely quickly.

Not a criticism, just an observation.
Probably stupid question but are keys like https://cdn.cle-serrure.fr/media/catalog/product/cache/13/im... that easy to pick ? I was under the impression that they were made this way exactly because they made the creation of tools harder (variation of widths of circles, code encoded on the small width of the key and not its big height...)
I believe lockpicking is meant to be used to gain entry undetected instead of just gaining entry. Thus you want to limit visible damage to the device.
Very simple solution, just ignore the patent and set anyone who tries to enforce it on fire
Agreed. And Mobile Safari's reader mode doesn't help.
That will produce an add plus a deletion. Whether or not this is considered a rename is up to git-diff, via the -M flag which specifies a “similarity index”. Side note, this doesn’t work with LFS-tracked files. But, with regular files you can say, e.g. you want the similarity index to be 50%, and then any files that were deleted that match 50% of their contents with another add will be displayed as a rename. So it’s really just a view thing. In the underlying storage, there is no such thing as a rename.
It's a fundamental problem with democracy + taste: we can only agree on cute cats, even if every individual has diverse actually cool interests.

An Subreddits can only help you towards alternative mainstream until they grow too big.
Leave your phone at home and go bicycling.

Worst case, you can ask someone for directions because everyone else will have a maps app.
I must confess, that when I first saw it, there was a flicker of the sadistic part in me that hoped the creator had already learnt to type at 120wpm with it.
As much as I want a single government without wars and nations, I believe that you are unfortunately right. A single entity is much easier to be corrupted and suppress humans. Perhaps there is still a way. I think EU is a good example. It has its problems but I can’t imagine Europe without it.
You might be onto something here. Communication is important, but so is the craft. It feels like we are going from one extreme to another.
Having a PiHole on your network makes it tolerable. But doesn't fix their broken recommendation system.
Or perhaps people who search caniuse see it's flaring omissions
Hyper Scientific Notation for Unspeakably Large Numbers
Which is exactly what we already have. There is what your local government says you should be doing, and there is what your friendly (or not so much) neighborhood superpowers say your government should be doing.
I think the poster you are replying to is suggesting a physical interpretation of QM
Firefox with uBlock Origin is effective at blocking them.
Well, it's not that easy. Let's say you have this layout :

- applications: front, backend, background-worker

- libs: database-orm

In a multi-repo layout, if you want to make a change in database-orm, you'll make your PR in its repo, test, and make a release with your changes.

Nice and easy right ? Well, you're not done. Now you have to make a PR to update the dependency on each repo using this library. If you're lucky, nothing breaks and it's quite quick.

But it's not always so easy : you notice that you actually broke something down the line in the backend. You have to fix it (in your library), and do it all over again. You can also have libraries depending on other libraries, multiplying the effort when you messed up something.

The monorepo handles that, you update one library and you can see what you broke down the line, and fix all of that quicker. Also, changes are easier to follow since one modification impacting several applications or libraries can be made into only one commit.

You can tell me that libraries should have a nice definition and the applications should be independent from the actual internals, but that's rarely the case. It's a tradeoff and lots of companies are going this route.
I’m currently in the middle of refactoring a well-tested but dict-ly typed Python codebase into dataclasses.

Once your app involves a certain amount of business logic, those dicts just beg for you to shove in just that one more temporary field that you’ll be needing later in the calculation.

Of course you can abuse classes just the same. But I feel it happens less often. There’s more social control. The type has a name now. And you have to visit it at home whenever you’re trying to add a field to it. My impression is that some people are underestimating the psychological power of those nudging factors.
Cheers.

A couple of others have also said the name and photo makes it feel more personal. I thought it might be a bit self-indulgent, but apparently not.

Oops, you're right! Yes the title tag is broken on the home page because the page has an empty title (as far as the static site generator is concerned).
Ways You Might Live Forever
Pillaging, exploitation, and destruction of the commons leading to ecological and societal degradation and eventual collapse has been documented as what capitalism does since there was a thing called capitalism

There's still plenty of boosters who will use fallacious arguments defending it that were just as tired hundreds of years ago.

Some people let their aspirations of greed blind them from what's clearly happening
https://paperswelove.org/ ?
This is very tangential, but in case it resonates with anyone else.

I was curious to discover recently that to try and bridge the gap between what we should arguably be doing to tackle Climate Change and what we are doing, a group has come up with the term Inner Development Goals to describe a set of abilities that might help with this transition.
https://www.innerdevelopmentgoals.org/

Curious if anyone else has come across this, expecially as I've done courses on Sensemaking, Counselling/Coaching, Critical/Systems Thinking and the Shadow (Jung) as mostly just life skills, but interesting to see them grouped together as potentially helpful generally, even if most of them would have to be studied in some depth to turn them into jobs.

The Why (from the homepage):

In 2015, the Sustainable Development Goals gave us a comprehensive plan for a sustainable world by 2030. The 17 goals cover a wide range of issues that involve people with different needs, values, and convictions. There is a vision of what needs to happen, but progress along this vision has so far been disappointing. We lack the inner capacity to deal with our increasingly complex environment and challenges. Fortunately, modern research shows that the inner abilities we now all need can be developed. This was the starting point for the 'Inner Development Goals' initiative.
1) If you centralize everything into one government: what if that one government becomes corrupt? Then you cannot run to any other governments.

2) Cultural differences will require that different populations operate and behave differently, you will never be able to put the same constraints on different cultures.
AirPods Pro 2 to feature heart rate monitoring, hearing aid function
Pay fines to who?

What about the human rights of the unborn babies?
I think part of the problem is that reddit seems to really aggressively push for subreddit growth. This artificially creates an "eternal september" almost everywhere. I'm not really sure why they are pushing this so hard, if it's to show investors how fast reddit is growing or something?

But bottom line is that perhaps the single most disruptive event an online community can experience is a large sustained influx of new members. It just will not be the same before and after.
Incredible, thanks for sharing. Seems like this whole website is packed with similar good explained help around mental health: https://www.mindmate.org.uk/
How do you encrypt on frontend?
How to watch Australia’s first commercial space launch live
A Cortex-M33 microcontroller costs like a coffee, and much less that that for Ikea that can then sell more lamps and at a higher margin, because people like introducing more complications in their lives, like software updates for what used to be a wire and a switch.
> But it's not always so easy : you notice that you actually broke something down the line in the backend. You have to fix it (in your library), and do it all over again. You can also have libraries depending on other libraries, multiplying the effort when you messed up something.

Since this is Go, it's trivial to point in-development branches of downstream projects to an in-development branch of a dependency before merging it for those projects' testing processes. (This still doesn't cover 100% of cases of course, but nothing does. The better answer is not to over-factor in the first place.)
Interesting that you stereotyped him that way.
You are entitled to that opinion as others are to the very huge gray intermediates AND the total opposite. Why not?
I also saw this doc 2 days ago. Google's Algos are weird.

I really enjoyed it, sad and fascinating story. I think like most people we have a need to share our opinions to some degree but as I got older I felt like it's pointless, or maybe sometimes unecessarily harmful so now I prefer to say nothing most of the time - a lot of my friends or colleague interpret this as depression or lack of motivation, maybe it is to some degree or maybe the circle of things I care about is getting smaller and smaller.
This is a PR stunt, but that does not mean we should not be allowed to appreciate it.

The impact is going to differ per country. For example, 550 USD might not be much for an average American programmer but for an average Ukrainian or Indian (the latter has a heart connected to) its a whole lot more. I also suppose Russian devs are out of luck.
My Brainfuck CPU – A Simple Processor in Python via MyHDL
World government is our only hope!
I find https://github.com/Docile-Alligator/Infinity-For-Reddit good on Android too
They have a paper on that release process

https://eng.uber.com/research/keeping-master-green-at-scale/
I guess the sheer numbers of smaller players really adds up, although it must be exponentially harder for artists who are reliant on expensive session musicians and studios for their sound (thinking of a friend who is doing it all her way and topping the jazz charts but boy is it a heck of a lot of work)
Do you really think that the couple hours it saves by having these maps to hand instead of a terrorist going to the station and making their own map of the public space is going to mean the difference between an attack and no attack? Get real. Let’s just get rid of all maps then hmm? Security risk.
》The EU created one of the most prosperous (for the common person), free and tolerant societies on earth.

House arrest several months a year, forced experimental vaccination, forbidden to heat house at winter, soon forbidden to use car, forced indoctrination of children, oposition parties banned or under surveillance, censorship, surveillance of private communications, overt racism and sexism...

My family has been through many regimes. Current one is not "free" or "tolerant". And it is not even prosperous, if young family can not afford house and children!
I myself believe in the need for a world government. I will make a great and kind emperor.

It's high time that everyone gets onboard with this.
Its the other way around, 100k for an initiative, 50k for a referendum.
Many don’t believe this is a human right, and you enforcing this on them is going against their will. This is authoritarian.
I rolled my eyes at that quote. People always have excuses for not finishing something.
50k. 100k is for if you want to introduce a new law.
> Cultural differences will require that different populations operate and behave differently

so you have local/regional government, responsible for local and regional policies. But global policies would be controlled by a global gov't.
I recently read Ray Dalio’s Principles of The Changing World Order. He essentially claimed that at the scale of world governments, man’s capacity to operate an intergovernmental social contract is non-existent. It is not without an effort to make it so, it’s just that unless there is a bigger fish defining the rules of the game are fair, we sort of brush up against Darwinian nature. Essentially, if a nation possesses some opportunity but doesn’t possess the means to defend it, it belongs to whichever nation is strong enough to come and take it.

Also, Max Tegmark’s Life 3.0 book has a fascinating fictional story about a company that uses AI to drive a new world order, back towards the center. It is both exceptionally hand-wavey but also not entirely unbelievable.

Not necessarily trying to make a point or anything, just thoughts that this article reminded me of.
Centralised government and democracy are not mutually exclusive.
Until when? I advocate parental "take backs" up til the kid's 18, but some think I'm a bit extreme.

I don't think forcing my opinion on anyone who disagrees is correct, but then neither do I want others' opinions forced on me.
I think it has narrow applications in government high security areas and some corporate things where covert access can be a catastrophe. Also large datacenters and what not where an unknown physical compromise, while VERY difficult to achieve, could have tremendous repercussions.

In 90% of situations a bad actor will probably just use brute force. There is something to be said if this isn't bump-able/pick-able, in that at least you won't have the situation where a potential bad actor gains "covert" access, and so people think they're supposed to be there, as opposed to them kicking down the door, but the number of scenarios where that actually matters is slim.
Julia was originally pitched as 'C-like speed with Matlab-like syntax', which explains 1-based arrays.
Yeah, those pictures are quite crazy. I follow him on Twitter and saw the thread asking for examples, I think he got hundreds of images!
Bandcamp is really great, although getting physical copies from outside the UK is still cheaper at the local record store. I also feel that it’s a good way to funnel money to the artist, although I’m concerned that Epic has bought them.
My understanding is that they are generally harder to pick, but not in any real fundamental way.

Example: https://youtu.be/verPAfwVSGg. Although he is really struggling here which is a huge win for the lock.
This is why one world government will happen at the barrel of a gun, if ever.
Huh, I worked with this architecture, and while it was convenient at first, it became an issue down the road. Here's what we had.

- A few times, we inadvertently exposed internal fields. They were not sensitive, just internal. Still, clients discovered and started using them and effectively blocked us from changing the data schema without updating the API version.

- A risk of inadvertently exposing sensitive fields. We never had this, but the mere fact that it was too easy to have, kept unnecessary pressure on us.

- Adjusting the serialization format for different purposes became a problem. When everything is a dict, it's difficult to bolt in custom serialization logic. We had this issue when we had to support different API versions, different object representations for different clients, or different purposes. For example, when we cache an object, we want to keep all the fields, but when we return it to an object, we need to maintain the subset of them.

- Slower onboarding. When a newcomer joins the project, they need to be aware that any database change may leak as an API attribute. They couldn't start working before they saw the whole picture.
To companies using my open source projects: please donate $550 then go on a $1m marketing blitz telling everyone about it. I don’t care how you spend your money outside your donation.

Now, this is a pseudonymous account so you obviously don’t know whether you use my projects. Just donate to whatever you use.

To expand: I see grandstanding all the time. I see precious little money flowing into my PayPal tip jar. Casual users of my completely free web services have been a lot more generous than companies/developers using my open source libraries/tools. I’m completely fine with the lack of donations, but that certainly makes all the grandstanding from stingy people who don’t give a dime very annoying.
For safes you of course keep it locked. But provide some hidden wires to power the lock if battery died. Of course you should think about protecting electronics from something like megavolt put on those wires, but it's doable and with enough iterations all weak spots should be fixed.
>How the hell is Lost Ark so popular?

It's still relatively newly released in the west, there was lots of hype, the game has a high amount of spit and polish, and its gameplay was filling an under served space. If it played like your typical tab-targeting MMO, nobody would have cared.

Also there's probably some bots increasing the steam player numbers, but that's another story. For now I decided to put it up there with FFXIV.

>Hell, I can't think of any game that placed so much emphasis on bodily noises.

I can: Genshin Impact. Genshin went in really hard on using micro transactions to let you play more, as well as having characters making sounds that are indistinguishable from pornography. Compared to what is typical for the Asian market, Korean games tend to be tame.

> The game where every fun little privilege seems to be a time-limited rental?

The way I understand LA is supposed to be played, is creating lots of alt characters so you can do the time-gated "fun" content on each them every day.

Personally I hate daily tasks in games ("dailies"), because then the game starts feeling like a chore and also I'd have to play every day to keep up. LA is full of those.
World government makes sense so that coverage of responsibility would be extended over all common areas such as air and oceans. With decentralised govt there is no owner of oceans, it's a common pasture, so nobody prevents certain countries from hunting down all the whales until extinction and poor countries making ocean a dumpster for plastics that rich green countries recycled their plastics to.

However, world government doesn't make sense before more planets are settled, because no governent model is perfect yet and the best model we have so far is a competition between states as to which model should prevail.

Eg., you are a monarchy and your next king is a moron. Too bad, having democracy would have made this only temporary. You are a democracy and your country's media run by oligarchs found a way to rule by influencing masses. Too bad, if you had a king, he would imprison the oligarchs.

There will be cycles in model of government in foreseeable future, so it is premature to decide on the one government style yet, so it is dangerous to do one and only world govt yet. Wait for Musk to colonize Mars at least.
How so? I have a pihole and the requisite config on my ddwrt router but still get plenty of yt ads.
Nobody plays the hardcore games. There is Mortal and Mortal 2 and most people hate them.
I adore how this design is approached and explained. Almost reads like a topic about software
I think the argument is whether it had been an underage drinking matters, though I do know first year undergraduate students does it a lot
Alternatively don't use monorepos, and take advantage of binary libraries.

Naturally there is the caveat that using binary libraries isn't a thing in Go.
I find Boost for Reddit way better than Sync (used both), but in the end it's about personal preference, there are 1-2 other decent clients, though Boost and Sync are probably ahead of competition.
Against their will to do what? Legalizing abortion doesn't mean forced abortions.
> You call it Merkle-style tree despite the fact it is obviously a DAG?

All trees are DAGs so that's not really adding much.
Have you asked anyone not German or French what do they think about living in the EU? I’m sure it’s turned out great for Germany and their lap dog, but let’s ask the Spanish, the Italians and especially the Greek and have this conversation again.