skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'd guess that they're targeting transoceanic freight. A flight from Shanghai to Los Angeles takes ~12 hours, and a cargo ship takes ~30 days. That's a huge gap that could be filled by an intermediate option.
Related: it strikes me as a paradox that we are envious of people in their 20s because they have their whole life ahead of them, and feel sorry for people in their 80s who have their life behind them. Does it mean we value the potential more than the realized? Is a potential life worth more, perhaps because it still contains all the promises of potential futures, while a life lived has been whittled down to a single path, with all the mistakes and regrets that it entails?
can't help but recall that James Bond movie where North Korean developed space solar into a laser beam which destroyed the DMZ to enable the North to mount a land invasion of the South
My user gets fed up because the page takes a second to load?

Not every page loads 50 different resources. Not every page serves people globally. Not every page has competitors.
That’s going to need a citation.
Christians and their faith lead the slavery prohibition movement.

I don't know the history of the other things you mentioned.
I write mainly in c and like most aspects of it but its the absolute minimum standard for built in library support.

The fact that simple reusable utility functions were/are complicated does make it feel half baked to me too.
I disagree.
When it comes to your eating habits listen to your body and ignore well meant but oftesn outright dangerous comments like this.

Especially from anyone that has a “miracle” cure just for you.

I have never eaten breakfast, always hated eating before lunch.

Having had this exact comment thrown in my face for 30 years.
Turns out ignoring everything and doing whatever fit me was not only healthy but has strong scientific basis.

Aka intermittent fasting.

Do not give bad advice or scold people for listening to their bodies and follow what works for them.
Just a note, but it's more or less settled that buying individual stocks is no better than gambling. The only proven successful way for a retail investor to interact with the stock market is to participate in the most diverse index of stocks possible, over a very long period of time.

Another settled concept is that attempting to "time" the market is also effectively gambling. The superior form of investing is to be in the market for as long as possible.

So buying diversified index funds, and holding on for as long as you can, is usually a good long-term strategy. A shorter term strategy would be something like a money market fund, for cash you expect to spend in a few years or less.

Assuming you're looking for general investment advice, do not put any money into crypto, period. That's like looking at lottery winners and deducing the best way to invest is to purchase lottery tickets.
> What would be the consequences of allowing Heisenberg to dictate codes of conduct for quantum physicists today

He couldn’t. All he could do would be to dictate the code of conduct for physicists working at the MPI. And if you don’t like his code of conduct, you can go to a different institute, or take it up with the community or the board of directors for the institute. Your implied scenario of “what if a nazi wrote a code of conduct” doesn’t scare me because the only thing worse than a nazi is a nazi in hiding. And if the code of conduct contains no nazi agenda, well then he can be held accountable if he does something against the code of conduct (like, for example, being a nazi)
I remember seeing a modern experimental structure that invites pigeons to nest, but due to its design, the nests are not stable and the eggs fall down, thereby reducing the pigeon population. The structure itself was similar to these in size and shape, maybe inspired from these.
Or you can try to fix the exploit. At least you can try to notice when people are exploiting it in the wild, which is to a first approximation "every time somebody cites the Paradox of Tolerance".
monkeypox is an orthopoxvirus, which is a completely different virus family from adenoviruses (which are used as the delivery vectors in the J+J and AZ vaccines.)

it's also like, an existing virus, with a long history of outbreaks. why would it be a side effect? how could it? how are people so gullible? it's like asking if climate change is caused by chemtrails or something..
"One way to entirely ruin the movie would have been to insert scenes with the Marshal's wife where she would ask why he's never home, and scold him for missing his son's football game, etc."

Heat was specifically about their personal relationships, so in that context it made sense.
Were you tested for coeliac disease? Diagnosis can be difficult, and the standard blood tests don't always pick it up.

It might be a good idea to avoid wheat, barley, rye, and oats to test for gluten sensitivity.
I'm not convinced by some of the common beliefs about low-carb diets either. They seem to be good for weight loss[0] but bad for all-cause mortality[1]. If you're making dietary recommendations, it's hard to justify choosing a diet that makes the people who eat it skinnier and less diabetic but also kills some of them.

I'm also not convinced that "low-carb" in the literature means you can draw conclusions about ketogenic diets, especially ones that actually send you into ketosis. Some low-carb diets from that first meta-analysis had 35% carbs by energy!

My impression of the available evidence is that if you want to lose weight, calorie restriction and high-satiety foods matter more than macros.

[0] https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/12/12/3774/htm

[1] https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal...
This is exciting stuff! I've been using the same process / algorithms for a video game analytics platform I've been building for the past few years. I uploaded couple videos of my work-in-progress which demonstrates many of these techniques first-hand in some games. Here are some videos to check out:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HO2c1RPdPpI - Recording mouse / keyboard

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASd5kdXz3hA - Learning a fighting game combo in Tekken

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6SgsyAY2G4 - Tracking / graphing character progression in Path of Exile
You don't (and can't, really) sharpen a serrated bread knife.
This is a great time to get into investing, as everything is on sale. It also avoids the trap of starting during a long bull market that makes everyone think they're an investing genius.

In terms of a a simple low-effort method... pick a few asset classes (such as the S&P 500 for US stocks, some bonds, international stocks, etc) choose a percentage to put in each one, and buy some ETFs based on those asset classes and percentages. You don't need to go crazy here, 3-5 of them is likely fine.

Invest systematically each month, don't worry about the price fluctuations.

Every 6-12 months (make a schedule) rebalance things to get back to those percentages you picked (if the stuff isn't still around those levels).

This is very low stress and hands off. The rebalance has you essentially buying relatively low and selling relatively high, without every trying to time the market.

The percentages you choose would be based on risk tolerance and how much time you have to let stuff grow.

I tend to agree with Warren Buffett and Bill Gates on crypto, it's a non-productive asset and your only hope is to sell it to someone who is willing to pay for it than you did (the greater fool theory). In 20-30 years maybe it will be something... or maybe it will be worth nothing and just a funny thing people bring up about the old days. The time between now and then, some people will get rich, while others will lose everything. People chasing FOMO (which sounds like where you're at) tend to be on the losing side of things.

Slow, consistent, systematic growth is basically a sure thing over the long haul and can make you a millionaire pretty easily. You're basically just betting on the US, and the global economy in general, surviving and growing. I know a lot of broke people who have been chasing get rich quick schemes and hot stock tips their whole life and have gotten nowhere.
Those are the same picture
Wanted to add, todays pipelines include a whole new level of security that was pretty much ignored in 2005.

Security adds complexity
normal battery G-shocks are rated to last 2-3 years
Total Recall has it all: The rather bloody action and shooting, the gimmicks (digital nail polish! Live X-ray scanners!), abstruse ideas and images (Kuato lives!), Arnie delivering zingers with an Austrian accent. And then, once you grow up and read Philip K. Dick, you actually understand how much of his ambiguous mind games made it into the movie, and watch it a couple of times with that additional perspective. There are very few films which deliver similar amounts of cinematic joy, unfortunately. The last two that I watched were Alfonso Cuaron's Children of Men, and surprisingly a Tom Cruise film, Edge of Tomorrow. Both highly recommended if you like Total Recall.
Except it's rendered wholly unacceptable for its target market by Canon's idiotic decision to go with a micro-HDMI port as its sole video output.
He beats expectations by linking to the actual source code
Having worked in art-house cinema for a while I beg to differ. Not only big action movies work in cinemas. Also art-house and specially quiet or slow movies tend to have a better effect and deeper experience in cinema. Often because of the fact that you can not pause and go to the loo or check your phone or get some other way distracted.

This does work better in art-house cinemas with quiet and invested audience. And people are different, audiences are different and peoples home watching experiences are different. But I can see clearly how the longer I work in cinema the more I prefer watching a movie in big screen instead at home. Even if I just watch it alone in big auditorium. Both for the ritual of taking the time out from other activities and completely focusing on the movie and enjoyment that good camerawork, acting, set-design and sound come better our on the big screen.

Obviously every viewing experience is different. In the end movie watching is experience between the viewer, film and co-audience. I have had many unforgettable evenings with very run down equipment or small screens. But I do feel that in our more and more distracted times cinemas carry a good function to present a film in distraction free setting, with good quality and mood supporting environment.

In addition to the technical quality I have learned to enjoy more and more how much enjoyment it is if someone knowable has made a choices and put together a film program. Like any good curator it brings out options I would never know to look for myself or would not really investigate because of my biases. Sadly it is finically more easy to sustain this kind of program in film festivals not in everyday cinemas.
James Bond has always been a phantasy for chavvy working class men. James Bond is basically a chav who solves his problems with violence, likes women and booze, but at the same time can cosplay being a suave, classy guy who rich people will have to respect.
Basically fairy tales construction workers use as daydream fodder to distract them from their menial jobs.
Also if you go to vacation hotspots in Southern Europe (Spain, Portugal, etc.) you'll find these types of brute, tattooed English chavs dressing in whatever brands James Bond wore in the last movie, while getting drunk in the midday heat and yelling obscenities at their mates across the outdoor cafeteria.
REPL Python programming and debugging with IPython
I know someone who, while depressed was playing solitaire and one other casual game for hours every day, for months. It was definitely not healthy.
And of course, the reason why we stopped using hydrogen for airships in the first place: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindenburg_disaster
I agree that a good manager can be liberating. One piece of advice that stuck with me is that good leadership / management is about serving your team.
> the idea that only the data that needs to be collected for a certain purpose should be collected.

The US has a similar stature, the Paperwork Reduction Act, a "law governing how federal agencies collect information from the American public", with the aim being to "not overwhelm [the public] with unnecessary or duplicative requests for information" and that the data collected be "a good fit for its proposed use" and further still "To respect privacy, we avoid asking for personal information that’s not relevant or necessary."
https://pra.digital.gov/about/

In practice, of course, this is all bullshit and any data that the government cares to collect is rationalized as fitting all those requirements.

So I'm curious if the German Datensprsamkeit is actually effective?
Well, I just think that's a bit misleading.

The justification for the banhammer is "I think you should be banned." The CoC doesn't enable or permit the mods to ban you. The mods can ban you because they're the mods; "can ban you" is pretty much definitionally identical to "is a mod." At most a CoC can serve as a guidebook for users.
Just two notes: "public debt" is no debt but just an old classic scam operated by few banksters. I suggest to rediscover for instance how the USA FED born https://www.heritage-history.com/index.php?c=read&author=car... the scam is well described by a scammer letter at the end of the page in a short bullet list.

Before central banks the scam was the same with "notes" (around 1300) but was the same. And people keeps accepting it.

Beside that paying rubles because other central banks do not exchange dollars or euros is not "default" is just the TRAGICOMIC example of the aforementioned scam, that have no practical effect of a sovereign and armed country, but have effect on individual citizens not in that very country but in any country where the same scam is applied.

Long story short: we are in a cyclic neoliberalism crisis, where people all over the world mass-protest, strikes are more and more bigger and spread etc, witch happen to be the time neoliberals élite need a war to steal someone else resources and justify with the war any sufferance in between. Of course Russian or China government are not that different, but being not in Russia nor in China it's not my interest, it the interest of their people revolting or keep going. My interest is ANNIHILATING actual oppressive western ruling class in my own country (EU) before they annihilate me. For that a mass general and peaceful strike SUFFICE. If just anyone stock a bit of food, water and stop working for a month anything breaks and oppressors must made an U turn and surrender not to foreign power but to their own people. That's how Democracy works.

Since that's unlikely, most people are obeisant subjects drinking propaganda at a very high rate, my point is that I doubt we can have a Democracy for the next 10-20 years at least, and in that very case I question my own values to other people that allow such obscenity oppression to exists. Or I question myself if a new feudal society it's not "natural" to a certain extent, since many are unable to be Citizen. Of course, a feudal society means a neo-bourgeois society, not ones with very few rulers like WTO, WEF, WB, IMF, WHO etc as background dictators managing proxy-puppet states as they wish, the quantity of people who happen to be Citizen is not that little.
> you have to also check that the index is in the list (instead of off the end) and that the value at the resulting index equals the value of interest to test containment

True. However, the hardest part of the binary search algorithm is implemented through bisect, so it still saves a lot of developer time.
Hmmm...you're still choosing among a set of systems that were also designed to manipulate human psychology, but survived a few centuries, potentially getting refined.

One argument is that a system that survives that long can't be full blown toxic (would destroy itself in the process), but it's still not guaranteed to be better than any other system that also aren't full blown toxic (include one you make up by yourself), until you dig really deep into it.

To take an example from another field, full-blown royal/aristocracies government went on for centuries in France, and the country was quite successful from several metrics. But looking back we wouldn't argue it was a pretty nice system that could still be chosen today, just because it wasn't outright toxic.
I remember driving with my parents during summer, and the windshield would be completely covered in dead insects.

These days, driving even for a couple of hours will at most leave a couple of dead insects on the windshield, so it's not just the bees.
No, you wouldnt be in legal trouble. I have news for you: When you're grocery shopping, there are cameras watching you: how long you spend looking at an item (which tells them if it's a regular purchase, or something you're considering), the path you take through the store, etc. They use this info to increase the amount of your purchase. The layout of a store is not random.

And then when you get to the register, they know you. Not just from your loyalty number, but from your credit card (even if you're not a member). They use this to create a history of your purchases and create a demographic profile of you.

They use this profile to determine what to stock in the store, what to put on sale, etc. For example, sometimes they'll stock an item with poor sales, because the customers that buy it make larger purchases (keeping these customers loyal to the store). They'll also use this info to advertise to you, send you flyers and coupons in the mail, for example.

They'll combine this with your credit card purchase history to create a more detailed profile... because Visa (et al) sell your purchase history to analytics firms that sell this data to companies like your grocery store.

Similarly, analytics firms already know who you're related to, and can match up purchases from other members of your household.

My point is: You dont think about even the stuff above, because it's hidden from your view and you arent familiar with what they're doing. Just like many people dont think about what Facebook is doing with their data. You phrase your questions like a hypothetical, but it already exists.
>Seems like it's just a new STD

There’s no evidence that the mode of transmission of this variant is specifically sexual. Monkeypox in general can be spread by close contact (such as e.g. holding hands, sharing bedsheets, …).
If you need to do so much work to make a single carpool lane you really have to think if that is the best solution in the first place. You already have too many cars. The obvious solution is reducing the existing number of cars. Open a couple extra bus routes and turn one of the existing lanes into a bus lane.
It's not about living to 100, but quality of life (to me personally). The gains in QoL are bigger than pizza/pasta.
I beg to differ. It's not ridiculous at all. The go-to retort to any kind of mild criticism for Japanese is people is to say "but country x or person y did the same, too!"

I have never heard this in nearly the same frequency or predictability from members of any other culture. It's almost cute in how revealing it is when you hit their weak spot.
The average wage in Japan is roughly twice as much as then, so about 200k in today's money
Huge progress? 3 months ago they were at the gates of Kyiv, today they're in no position to threaten Kyiv, and are struggling to nibble away at one small chunk of territory at a time.

Russia does not have time on its side. It's economy is going down the toilet, it's losing the ability to make new munitions, Ukraine on the other hand just needs time to train troops and wait for western deliveries of weapons.

Russia's only chance was a quick win in less than a week, it's failed to do that.
What Popper probably meant was something more akin to, “don’t be a pacifist when people are starting to resort to violence”. At least that’s my reading.

It’s also interesting that the more extreme version of the “paradox of tolerance” is very close to the legal reasoning used during the Red Scare to justify bans on communist parties.
I find it weird that your gold standard of a good hobby is the ability to produce. I personally think those "fuzzier returns" you sort of disregarded are far more important.

Also, particularly in video games, each time you engage in it you get better. I've been recently trying to get back into video games after over a decade of off time. The gap I feel is tremendous. Gamers have advanced so far ahead that a good gamer from 2000s will have incredible amount of trouble playing newer games.
Those things aren't particularly news to me.

My question is more along the lines of, it seems to me that it's OK (in the sense of being tolerated by the public and legal) when corporations engage in this kind of behavior, but would it be OK if individuals engaged in this kind of behavior against employees of these corporations?
It was well worth making the point, though. I recently bought a 2nd hand Intel NUC as a potential home server. Came with Ubuntu and used about 10 watt on idle. Put OpenBSD on it and it now draws 20 watt - I assume because OBSD is much less aggressive about idling. That’s about £3 per month extra on electricity if run 24/7.
Rohan makes a valiant and useful attempt to expand the over-simplified
notion of digital privacy. Anything that throws more light on this
area is welcome. However I feel that some of the distinctions are
incomplete or need highlighting more strongly.

The word 'tracking' shouldn't be used to stand-in for "absence of
privacy". For example, I may want to be tracked in every detail and
might buy a GPS tracker. However it should remain under my exclusive
control. If I find it's defective because it's treacherously uploading
my data somewhere I didn't ask it to, that's a breach of privacy.

The suggestion that techniques for web browsing might be generalisable
to wider privacy doesn't hold up well. The main focus is mitigations
(evasion and reduction) against cross-site identity leakage. Active
obfuscation, avoidance, spoofing, dazzle, camouflage and decoying
isn't covered, nor are threat actors or actor position. For example my
ISP or device vendor may be a greater threat than a website (doubly so
when the device and site are owned by the same entity eg. Google.)

It is oft said that privacy means different things to different
people, but this is not the same as saying people have different use
cases and needs, and is rarely unpacked by socio/psychological
analysis (different expectations and ethical judgements may exist
within the same use-cases and needs).

Also, someone "being okay" with a violation of privacy is not a
sufficient indicator. Objective harms exist and they don't go away
because the user is ignorant or convinced, or coerced to make
"acceptable trade-offs".
I think it might even just be that living life is awesome in general (overall, though there are obvious ups and downs). So the more you have left to live, the better
I use my website, but post to twitter or HN or hackaday, I also host source on github for increased discoverability.. I don't know if sf.net is still relevant, I don't think my latest projects are on there, but it used to be very helpful in getting my stuff out and discovered.
It _appears_ to mock itself, so it wouldn't be blamed for fascist's propaganda while being essentially a recrutement tool for US military.
Which does not seem to justify preemptive intolerance of peacefully expressed dissenting views.
You can watch it if you’ve got the stomach for it

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IjO8wsjPqbg

It’s… unpleasant, at best.

But you’re right it’s not exactly a “sex” scene, since any sex is implied
Unpopular opinion: Bread in the US mostly is of low quality. Whole wheat or multi grain bread with a hard crust as it is common in Germany or Switzerland is superior in taste, texture and nutrition.
Math on GitHub: Following Up