skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I never said it draws any conclusions - I'm just saying that "GMOs are harmful" has not been conclusively invalidated by data by any means - and there's definitely plenty of data out there to cause concern IMO.

I don't buy organic food because I think it's healthier either btw. I do it because of the environmental impacts - same reason I buy local as much as possible via CSAs for my meat and veggies - whether they are certified organic or not (you can usually find a local farm that has practices just as good or better than certified organic anyways). It's super ironic to me that people think they're being environmentally friendly or saving the earth with GMO non-organic food just because it isn't meat. For all the conspiracies around Bill Gates I think his ideas of using tech to save the environment are scarier because it's actually ignoring science.
Appreciate it, but it was a glib way of saying evidence needed not citation. I know that thing was said - but I din’t believe it to be backed up by historical evidence
Register and vote at all elections: https://www.vote.org/
What kind of a question is that? Obviously you have to agree to it! What right do you have to kill someone just because you are inconvenienced?

You aren't required to save their life, but you also can't kill them.

Is this seriously an abortion argument, or are you just trolling? Are you seriously telling me people are OK with killing someone just because it's not convenient?

I always thought that the abortion argument was because they did not consider their unborn child a person. If you do consider that child a person then obviously you can't kill it.
I seriously loved Shenzhen I/O, thank you for your service, Zachtronics.
SML is the dead end because specification wasn't updated for decades.
I thought about that after posting. I once had a week where I fiddled with the printer constantly after changing the toner, trying to get it to stop reporting it as empty. So who knows, maybe there's something to it. However, looking at the toner cartridge, I don't really see how they could do this.

It's also possible they have a unified firmware and this 'feature' doesn't impact my model.
DRY comes from a time where you had people not using abstractions at all. I have seen code from the 80s where code for printing forms were one function each writing directly what gets sent to the printer for each form with no abstraction at all. DRY was meant for people that wrote that kind of code. If all you have ever come into contact with is normal modern code, than DRY goes overboard: you start to abstract too much and make the code harder to read and maintain.

The real art is maintaining the balance between abstraction and pragmatic simple code.
I would recommend a Cricut machine. Far less maintenance and everyone in the family can use.
Yes, I have done many virtual meetings using VRS. You do have to ensure that you do everything a little slower if you’re using a lot of technical language because the terps need time to fingerspell.

I’ve also used a video interpreting service for in person meetings (the terp is virtual everyone else is in person). That works well because private interpreter services will take the time to review a slide deck, notes, or a glossary ahead of time and learn any jargon or be prepared to come up with abbreviations with the Deaf coworker.
One issue with immutable data stores for businesses is compliance with things like GDPR. You need some mechanism for scrubbing data and its version history effectively making it non-immutable.
I suppose in this case, if the pregnancy is the result of rape, contraceptive failure, or simple lack of sex education, abortion would be legal, and otherwise it wouldn't be.

Maybe odd at first glance, but the more I think about it the more sense it makes. It helps to turn the logic on its head - should it be legal to deliberately or negligently create human fetuses, only to kill them?
I only went across the channel in one of these once, but loved it. Much more comfortable than the catamaran for example, which I found much more juddery.

In any case the massive mechanical cool of these things was awesome to see. It was like stepping into the world of Thunderbirds. No video can give the same experience.
>National Popular vote should not be used for any reason for any purpose, unless you want to completely change the American system of government

Well, yes, that is exactly what many people want, a government that is more representative of the will of the people. We don't have to throw out federalism to get there, but a system that was not intentionally designed to support minority rule would be nice.
You shouldn't be praising that the company sold. Of course, a congratulations, etc. is in order (as you would if someone won the lottery!).

What you should praise is the _input_. Their hard work. The effort. I believe there are studies reinforcing this difference being crucial wrt education of children but I don't have any on hand. :)
You seem to ignore the 9th Amendment...

"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

So if a right is not explicitly enumerated, it still exists and is retained by the people, NOT the States, the PEOPLE! A right to privacy, to control ones own body is fundamental to freedom.

Read the Thomas concurrence, lots more individual freedoms are going to be killed off by these theocratic fascists on the court.
It's easy to like it when it provides you the outcome that you're favourable towards. For people, the majority in this case (as evidence by the popular vote count), who do not agree with these outcomes, federalism is a fucking mess.

In no way it makes sense that the Senate should wield the power it has when South Dakota has the same weight as California. It's ludicrous.
And pot. And legal protections for workers in the workplace. Still, the Dems seem like weirdly ineffective standards bearers for all this, plus the Senate and gerrymandering.
> Nobody is enforcing social views on anybody.

Actual that’s what all these cases were about. Roe v Wade- some states wanted to treat abortion as murder and control women’s bodily autonomy. Lawrence was about keeping sodomy laws which could be used to legally discriminate against gay people. Griselwald is clearly about social views on contraception.

> egregiously bad ruling to be thrown out. And despite your fear mongering, today's decision went out of it's way to say that it is not meant to apply to any of those other issues that you mentioned.

The main opinion did not rule this out, or if I did I absolutely missed it. Thomas’ solo concurring opinion calls these cases out by name as worthy of reconsideration by the court - “In future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court's substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell.”

It’s hard to take this argument seriously at all. It feels like you are not paying attention, saying everything is fine while the 14th amendment is on fire.
Democrats in general have some unhealthy obsession with the presidency that leaves important downstream races from local municipal government to gubernatorial races ignored. Republicans have been doing the grueling work for decades to dominate local politics and it shows.

Roe v Wade is so devastating of a defeat largely because democrats who support it don’t care enough about state and local government.
On Solana they take 0.03 seconds and cost a fraction of that as well. That might sound unnecessary, but it actually enables novel and compelling use cases for monetary transactions. Programmatic value transfer solves problems we didn't even know we had, whether its Bitcoin, Algorand, Ethereum, or Solana.
I feel like you could be paid, or coerced by some country...
Bold claim. If true, I would like to see the academic paper which I expect would contain the big-O time complexity, an explicit comparison to e.g. quicksort, and a general-purpose algorithm.

If the sort is multi-threaded then this needs to be run as single-threaded as the item under test here is the algorithm, not how many cores it can be spun out to simultaneously (since many other sorts can be multi-threaded too).
> If you believe that life begins at conception

Someone believing life begins at conception is a reason for THEM to not get an abortion, it is not a reason for the government to outlaw it.
I recently did this and had two utility bills. But two isn't accepted so I was given an affidavit form where I wrote down that I was who I claimed to be.
> Forcing someone to bring an unwanted child into this world is not enlightened.
> They’re often not ready for that responsibility

So they could have used condoms, the man could have avoided ejaculating where it could cause pregnancy, or they could also just not have sex or the woman could take pills or an IUD. Unless it was rape, nobody forced them to have a child.

I do agree that there should be programs that help the parents more.
> ...it seems one by one the promises of crypto of the last several years are evaporating...

Did you even read it?

> Starting on June 27, Coinbase will introduce some changes required by local regulations...

How is this hardly Coinbase or crypto's fault? Sounds like local regulations made by local people who don't understand it at all.
I have asked for a paper menu in these cases and almost all restaurants have been happy to oblige. One time the restaurant let me use their ipad to see the menu.

I wouldn’t count on this, but I’m trying to give a business money. Most are happy to satisfy reasonable requests.
> They appear to be no different from any other illegal digital banking scheme.

One very important distinction is that Liberty Reserve doesn't exist anymore, because they didn't bother to design a technology that enabled them to dodge prosecution.
20% is a large portion of the USA. That's 1 out of every 5 Americans.
A this point US doesn’t even have the moral right to point out Taliban’s discrimination against woman.
It's not only about having a SIM but also have one 'they' like. I am with a small provider here in Switzerland (that is the daughter of the biggest provider) and things like Twitter, Twitch, .. don't even support that number for whatever reason.

I personally only use throwaway rental numbers on the web, basically giving me the worst security possible for any kind of account that falls back to SMS for security.
This is one of those cases, where, people like the original commenter, if we assume they are arguing in good faith, will then be "surprised" when it turns out those they are electing actually aren't committed to it being a "states' rights" issue. Devolution of authority to the states is just the current tool the right have to further restrict access to abortion, if federal legislative power to ban abortion becomes available to them, they will drop the "states' rights" approach immediately.

It's really a tale as old as time (or at least as old as the United States). "States' rights," outside of theoretical discussions, has always simply been a tool, not a true guiding ideology.
Scripture actually says that God recognized certain people before they were even conceived.

God is omniscient though, so I don’t think that’s a useful standard for the cops to use when deciding who to throw in jail.
It is possible they could without a direct vote. FDA just banned juul for not having adequate studies on effects of their products and how they market them. No vote, not much public discourse. Looking at that in another way they banned a drug/substance that damages cells in your body. Abortions drugs/procedures damage cells in your body. I'm sure if if someone really wanted to at fda they could start requesting abortions federally stopped until they can prove some unprovable concept.
The jaded side of me says: vote in more moderates that are willing to strike compromises

Suppose I come along and assault you, you defend yourself, and then someone comes along and tells you that you are as much to blame as the person who assaulted you. Are they accurate, or just squeamish?

Moderates generally lack any firm convictions or anchoring principles beyond maintaining equanimity, and so contribute mightily to shifting of overton windows and ethical drift, where increasingly flawed outcomes are excused in the name of avoiding controversy. Consider the the atrocities perpetrated pursuant to the Iraq war, for which nobody but the very lowest ranks (and only a few of them) have ever been held accountable.

I respect my ideological enemies more than this panglossian excuse-making. At least those people stand for something.
Do you "feel" that's incorrect then?
As others have pointed out - it’s the city of Glasgow trialing this work week.

That said, in most (all?) countries, workplace is a regulated relationship. That means there are labor laws and you as an employer of others have to follow them. Even as an employer of self, some laws still apply. In some places you cannot require 6 days a week, in others you can but must pay overtime. As a society we agree on certain concessions with our rights in order to protect others. If you don’t like the concessions a given society has made, look for one that meets your values better.
Exactly. Everyone must know and accept that some people's votes are worth more than others. Whether it is for a senator in Iowa, or for the electoral college that selects the president, the people in some areas of the country are allotted more power than those in others. It has always been that way and so shall it remain.

Anyone not happy with the power allotted their vote is free to up stakes and move somewhere where votes are worth more, from California to Iowa or New York to New Hampshire.
I saw Mars and Jupiter up close with some cheap Celestron Binoculars on a tripod. Could see 4 Galilean moons of Jupiter lined up nicely like tiny white dots.
> made for sportswear for leisure, or even seeing it spill into the workplace

Hopefully you are young enough to have been spared the indignity of
witnessing a plague of fluorescent legwarmers and sweatbands escape
the aerobics gyms of the 1980s. :)
I think it comes down to Occam's razor. There are two equally valid theories:

1. Other humans are sentient, therefore they act like what I would expect sentient beings to act like

2. Other humans (or a subset of them) are not sentient, they are just insanely complex biomachines that mimic acting like what I would expect sentient beings to act like

In 1. sentience can be explained as a property common to at least humans, and maybe further as an inherent property of complex machines.

In 2. sentience seems to be a property of a subset of humans. Why? What makes sentient beings sentient? Answering this question requires invention of a soul.

Theory 1. feels simpler to me.
We should lobby them to change the rules, as a second e-mail account would literally be a second factor. Then it's up to the user to hook it up to their phone.
> Why is it...

Because it's more exciting to punish Bad People for doing Bad Things than it is to create systems where the Bad People don't want or need to do Bad Things as much.
If we're speaking about what one should use as guiding principles, then it seems that if one acts for the "right" reasons, then that usually result in doing the right thing and only unusually results in doing the wrong thing.

Whereas if one acts for the "wrong" reasons, then that will only rarely result in doing the "right" thing.

One can look back at the original Roe v Wade and say "The right thing was done here, the outcome was good", but having that sort of consequentialist outlook tends to blind people to the downside of having the right things done for the wrong reasons- which is as we see here, those wrong reasons can in the future easily lead to the undoing of the right thing.

The original Roe v Wade decision meant that Congress never had to pass a law that explicitly nationally legalized abortion. If they had, the current situation wouldn't exist.
You can go to prison for manslaughter. So should women who's body naturally aborted which happens quite regularly (30-40%) [1] be charged with manslaughter?

Birth control actually prevents implantation rather than conception every once in a while [2], would taking birth control be considered manslaughter if proven it prevented implantation rather than conception? This is actually what many are worried about now that Roe v Wade is down, Griswald vs Connecticut could be up next.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miscarriage

[2] https://www.guttmacher.org/antiabortion-activists-their-own-...
British Councils aren't like US States if that's what you're thinking - they're just local administrative systems. They manage your trash collection - they aren't legislating or regulating anything to anyone.
>What is the resource cost for that, why are we not talking about that in this context?

Presumably because nobody knows it. Personally, I'm not aware of any nuclear power plant that has been replaced. I also don't know why one would need to replace the entire plant and not just the core and possibly surrounding structures.

>Would you like to include nuclear waste disposal as an ongoing resource cost in the consideration? Where do you draw the line?

I don't think a line should be drawn anywhere. If we're talking about sustainability and total impact, we should look at all the facts, otherwise we're drawing conclusions off incomplete data. It should be possible to reduce the entire situation down to a single "impact per Joule" value that's comparable between any two power production systems, and every impact that's caused in order to produce that Joule (mining, land use, pollution, etc.).

>If not, then what's the point of fixating on this single aspect with regards to solar and solar only? Just because this one is a figure that's easy to quote out of context and sounds kinda bad? Can I make you realize that in this light it's hard to not think of this as deliberately cherry-picking an argument for argument's sake?

The point is that treating rooftop solar as "free" because it's supposedly a one-time cost is at best naive, at worst disingenuous. I have no interest in making nuclear look good or solar look bad, but let's call a spade a spade. Neither of them has zero impact on the environment. Pretending that they do means we're not making rational decisions.

>Also, as has been pointed out, the ever repeated claim of solar inefficiency is baseless in the most literal sense, due to the lack of a comparable reference point for nuclear.

I wouldn't say it's baseless. The figures on efficiency by themselves are measurable and true. It is true, though, that nothing can be said to be (in)efficient in an absolute sense, for the reasons you say. That's why I never said "solar panels are inefficient". All I said on the matter was that efficiency in this sense is exactly the same kind of efficiency that an IC engine has, because, as I said, dpierce9 was trying to reframe the discussion for no reason. Well, I don't think it was for no reason.

>Because it's already correctly priced into the running costs, just as - I suppose its proponents will claim - the corresponding facts above are for nuclear.

I'm not sure either are. Is the pollution caused by semiconductor production, or as you mentioned the warming of natural waters used as coolant, priced into the corresponding products?

>the only reasonable comparison could come from a much broader view that you're explicitly not interested in.

Yes, I agree, that's the only reasonable comparison. I would be interested in that if anyone came forward with an actual analysis from which we could derive a figure like the one I mentioned above.
Completely agree. I was completely sucked in by Opus Magnum, but other than that, I've bounced off all of them.

But I know understimulated teenage-me would have been all over that stuff, so there's definitely a market for it.
I built a small multitasking kernel with a friend with a 68000 (m68000) in college. We implemented it on breadboards, I think with 30 or so feet of jumpers [0]. I had very little prior embedded experience, so it was trial by fire.

It was a wonderful introduction to how kernels work (or at least concurrency and scheduling) at their most basic level, without having to deal with the complexity of virtual address spaces, memory protection, or the byzantine bring-up dance of register prodding that x86_64 needs. It prepared me well for my operating systems class the next year, and as far as I can tell, was the eye-catcher project that got me an internship on a team doing kernel development the following summer.

The instruction set is also a dream. Super CISC-y, yet more enjoyable (and IMO easier to grok) than x86. Take a look: http://wpage.unina.it/rcanonic/didattica/ce1/docs/68000.pdf

My favorite is DBcc - "Test condition, decrement, and branch". All in one instruction.

[0] - https://i.imgur.com/MKD7wTv.jpg

Here's the code - I have no idea how it works anymore, and I believe it's incomplete compared to what I had running. The complete code archive I think is lost to time - https://github.com/dymk/68k/blob/master/projects/libraries/l...

My friend wrote up a much more comprehensive document on the build:

https://github.com/ZigZagJoe/68k

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ejW_Ist19tIXeA5HtEWixaLo...
Arguably Roe distorted national politics. This ruling might now distort local politics. It's going to be interesting. We might well see a multi-decade swing to the Democrats!
Except a DSLR can't make an image that they take on their own device and walk away with it to immediately post to socials. that's the thing that draws them in.

A DSLR image needs to be processed to bring out the true qualities of the image. Also, a DSLR's tiny little pixels while a literal shit ton of them means that objects like planets resolve very small in the image. That's why most plantery images are still popular to use webcam level cameras.
"Please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

(Submitted title was "Glasgow City Council approves 4-day week on full pay".)
Until they use their political tools that worked to suppress so many popular things to supress democratic feed back cycles as well.
Because they didn’t have their body subjected to those last, most difficult months of pregnancy.

My own surprise (but very wanted!) pregnancy was easy the first few months - I even skied up through week 16, but around week 30 I started developing back pain and intermittent numbness in some of my toes that is still around, after nearly two years and lots of physical therapy.

And I was always considered to be having a “healthy” pregnancy, and was pretty healthy beforehand. Only unusual thing is that I was 40.

For a more extreme but still realistic hypothetical, I have a severely physically disabled friend who weighs about 60 lbs and requires regular mechanical breathing assistance. She is, as far as she knows, just as capable of getting pregnant as I am. She also knows that she would not survive more than a few weeks of pregnancy.

There are many people capable of becoming pregnant who live somewhere between these two extremes.
So the screen on the Pi takes up all the pins. Thats one reason for using the Teensy (a different screen would be nice, but the Hyperpixel is the perfect form factor and just looks nice and is easy to install). Another is that using the teensy + MIDI over USB keeps things flexible if the project moves to something other than a Pi to run the DAW.

Teensy only would be nice, but it would have been much harder to write the DAW for the Teensy. using the Pi + Linux, I was able to use JUCE and the tracktion engine which simplifies a lot and does a ton of heavy lifting.
FYI: If you have more questions, the OCaml forum is very friendly and helpful: https://discuss.ocaml.org/