skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I dunno, after growing up ~poor and now working in tech I am still acutely aware of prices. Because I have to make an effort to tell myself I can afford things easily, many of my purchases tend to be baseline-cheap or with no concern for the price, with less middle ground than one would expect. Sometimes I have relapses when I pick up my usual fancy coffee bag and I'm like "why are you buying fancy coffee, the store brand has twice as much beans for the same price", so I have to be like "it's ok, whatever, I can afford it". Which is probably also not too healthy.

Still, with that background, I do notice things... Like e.g. someone I know who grew up lower middle class in America (n=1, admittedly) being surprisingly oblivious of prices in the grocery store. Buying $7 artisanal ice-cream when $3 ice-cream is just as good - it's literally $100/mo right there, just on one item. Sure, they can easily afford it now, but I wonder if the notion that it costs $100/mo even crosses their mind in any way. I see people who look like they are homeless (there's a big extremely-affordable-housing apartment building next to the store) buying fancy beer... when I was poor I was drinking Bud Light equivalent ;) I am only slightly judging - to each their own, but then, it might indeed cramp your spending elsewhere.
They're larger, more complicated, and more dangerous (when done wrong) structures than solar farms. Even without the anti-nuclear turn they would take longer to build and have more strenuous requirements to meet than a solar field...
They should have mentioned udevadm too. How do they debug their udev rules without it?

Overall a low quality article IMHO, it's just basic knowledge in a fancy dress.
The McMurty as normally configured is good for 30 minute track sessions, and I haven't heard anything about it having a small battery for the day, nor did the weights being quoted indicated it was a small battery. A smaller pack could also reduce power potentially so they might not be able to do that for a net win.

>I actually don't have any doubts about who would win that, short of some very real development on Speirling's part...

It is a team that figured out how to absolutely shatter the goodwood record that VW had set, seems strange you are so confident they can't figure out Pikes Peak.
You don't think the UAW has any impact on the price of autoworker labor?
“0.2 ± 4.5 mm Hg for diastolic pressures and 0.2 ± 5.8 mm Hg for systolic pressures, a performance equivalent to Grade A classification” per the Nature abstract linked in the article: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41565-022-01145-w
> usually not understanding the shape of your data is something that you should fix up-front as it indicates you don't actually understand the problem you are trying to solve.

This is a good point and probably correct often enough, but I also think not understanding the entire problem you are solving is not only common, but in fact necessary to most early-stage velocity. There is need to iterate and adapt frequently, sometimes as part of your go-to-market strategy, in order to fully understand the problem space.

> a relational DB with well-defined constraints could have saved you from while still in dev

This presumes that systems built on top of non-RDBMS are incapable of enforcing similar constraints. This has not been my experience personally. But its possible I don't understand your meaning of constraints in this context. I assumed it to mean, for instance, something like schemas which are fairly common now in the nosql world. Curious what other constraints were you referencing?
Disclaimer; Didn't read because paywall.

I think people over think this. I printed out a few of the forms my wife would need if I die, made sure she knows the pin for my phone, wrote down the business bank account passwords and stuffed them a safe for her.

Outside of that, I'm not important and it doesn't matter. Let the chips fall where they may.
It's fairly popular in my organization yes, but too much trouble for me until/unless Google Meet supports it in Firefox.
Are Git submodules really that bad? Really? Maybe it's me that haven't yet discovered their true dark side. They're not perfect, but works well for mid-sized projects at least.
Thing hit moon, impact launched another thing up, which then fell close by?

Idk anything about orbits, so the experts have prolly already rejected this hypothesis
Nerfs can represent reflection, speculars, refractions.

They also are proving to be faster, more accurate, etc

The input data is the same. Nerfs have the chance of requiring less input data.
Absolutely. Including the 2% from Python scripts :P
No it isn't - that is a choice made by phone vendors to include it, but they are perfectly free to ship their phones with firefox, or opera, or no browser at all.

The android OS has no knowledge of chrome and it doesn't get any special handling or abilities like iOS/Safari.
It may also be that it's moderately heavily edited; what stood out to me was the "pauses" before "two" and other numbers sometimes, which is something that you hear in computer generated audio.
I think it depends on your teams' expectations for code review. It seems like perhaps your team doesn't define what is acceptable/constructive/valued, etc from reviewers.

Personally I prefer the first one on this list: it gives the author the opportunity to refuse the suggestion. Perhaps its a frivolous request and the PR is already been open for far too long. Maybe the author would prefer to leave the duplication there until there's more justification for extracting it to a function. Who can say?

Not all feedback is necessarily good or useful.

Personally I don't bother with suggestions like this where it's more of a style preference unless there is a style guide to adhere to where "extracting this to a function" would clearly connect to a guideline.

I tend to focus on verifying the that the author did their homework: what evidence/proof did they submit that ensures me the change is correct wrt. specs/requirements/tasks? If that evidence/proof is sufficient that's all I care about: it makes it easier to manage a higher volume of review requests.

I have a pet peeve for suggestions that are "trivial" and based on, "well I would have written it this way," as I don't find them terribly useful most of the time. They rarely affect the specification of the program and their claims to readability/maintainability are often dubious and superficial. Bike shedding is a huge waste of time in the review process. At least when worded with, "Should we..." there's a chance for the author to explain whether they had already considered that or accept the suggestion as helpful and make the change.
Probably depends on a video player of your browser, how it scales the video. It's just an mpeg4 video published on the website.
Well the a11y has bin removed so no privacy- for blind people. Thanks!
The ruling with regards to interstate commerce was obviously correct. Local businesses even vertically integrated ones are part of a national marketplace
That is a solution, but pretty much the only solution in the USA.

In a European city you usually get multiple choices, be it walking, cycling, a bus or some sort of rapid transit system.

What I hate about being in the USA is all the time spent sitting in a car. The day really runs away from you.
I know Clickhouse uses MergeTrees which are different from B+trees. However it can't really be used as an RDBMS. It's especially bad at point reads.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Log-structured_merge-tree
Nice. A few years ago I designed a query language to do aggregations in RediSearch, and it's quite similar in its structure. https://redis.io/docs/stack/search/reference/aggregations/
It may be true that people don't need to use these commands in the first week. Still doesn't make them advanced. Perhaps intermediate but I think even that is a stretch.

You can drive a car and never open the hood if you want. Opening the hood to change the oil still doesn't make you advanced in any way shape or form. Doing your own breaks is a step further but it's still pretty basic.

Swapping your engine, is advanced, redoing your suspension is advanced. You can't just call using an oil pan and a wrench advanced because most people don't it.
Yes, that's what I want. It turns out a phone and a web browser are different products.

This isn't rocket science.
you can sync your bookmarks and tabs with the IOS version of firefox too, but no extensions.
Yea who do you think benefits most from the Fed's printing press?
> Strictly speaking, poop is not your body's output

A significant fraction of poop is bacteria. Sources vary a bit, but for example, this study gives the fraction as ~55% of solid matter: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7359576/

To the extent that your body contains a large bioreactor in the gut to maintain a population of beneficial microflora, you could argue poop thus is one of your bodies outputs (and yes, it contains waste products as well).
Sync Your LUKS Boot and User Passwords
What are you talking about - I've been growing and growing as an adult!
It's just a video element.
My large FAANG-equivalent company has been trying to mandate return to work for months now, but employees simply ignore them. After 2+ years it's hard to believe things will ever return to "normal".
With Postgres, you can always just have a JSONB column for data whose shape you're unsure of. Personally, I'd rather start with Postgres and dump data into there and retain the powers of RDBMS for the future, rather than the other way around and end up finding out that I really would like to have features that come out of the box with relational databases.

I think a valid reason for not choosing a relational database is if your business plan requires that you grow to be a $100B+ company with hundreds of millions of users. Otherwise, you will probably be fine with RDBMS, even if it will require some optimizing in the future.
That was a correct ruling which was replaced by getting biased refs
Some years ago Racecar Engineering magazine had an excellent editorial that touched on the rising costs of F1, the technological benefit to consumers these programs can have but also the rising difficulty of keeping up with the Joneses and that perhaps we might be reaching the budgetary limit of what racing teams can realistically finance.

The author proposed "Formula Zero," where teams would be national rather than purely sponsor-oriented. Team America (cue music) vs. Team Japan vs. Team Italy etc. Note that this was years before the zero-emissions effort of the same name. Cool idea, and one might imagine what could emerge from efforts where NASA helps with aerodynamics for Team America, DLR for Germany, etc. (and/or DOE's combustion engineering experts consulting on Team America engine design: the potential collaborations run long).

Fun fact: a major limiting factor for racing speed is the allowed size of the brakes. Let F-1 cars have titanic wheels with low profile tires and lap speeds would shoot way up. Of course, brake too little or too late and the resulting wreck will almost certainly be fatal — it's pretty tough to protect against coup-contrecoup injuries no matter how energy-absorbent the car may be when speeds get really high. Scrambled brains are good for breakfast, bad for drivers.
They probably can, but they prefer not to make it too obvious.

https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2020/4/9/21204425/targeted-ads...
Most underrated comment
Sometime over the past several years we seem to have discarded any specific definition of the word "fascist". All we're left with is just "somebody whose politics I disagree with".
It would be safer to do something where the sign-in occurs on the library's website as opposed to Kanopy's. But you should be able to verify on the applicable library website that they have a legitimate partnership with Kanopy and that this is a permitted use of your login credentials, e.g.: https://www.torontopubliclibrary.ca/kanopy-help/ and https://www.vaughanpl.info/databases/index/alphabetical/K
These are dev written and Python3 read files, the parser of which hasn't changed in a decade. Everyone knows how to write them. The parser is also lenient and handles both kinds of comment. That's enough for simple metadata.

We have a 15 year old setup.cfg in one project at work, many other .ini's... has never been an issue.
We should be clear here that "JIT"/VM vs sandboxed code are two different considerations. Regardless of how your code is interpreted/compiled/run, you still are operating within the app sandbox. So most arguments about safety etc are fairly useless. The only "valid" line of argument is more in the UX space. Apple isn't able to vet the userflows in the same way if you do a post-release update.

And to be clear when I say a handrolled VM, I mean that the VM knows how to interpret dynamic things into native things. This is a lot more powerful in Objective-C since it uses message passing anyways so you could theoretically build a full app in some JSON payload. So sure your native code is static, but thats because its just 1 function called 'eval'. This is still possible in Swift but requires more explicitness since it doesn't have the same dynamicism built in.

It doesn't have to be entire apps that are custom though. Most app devs use it for things like customer-editable content. Think of things like the ability to update home screen layouts, or tab layouts/behavior. Depending on how much baked-in customization you build this can be extremely robust.
When is the humidity a problem? If I have my thermostat set to 73 and the system is maintaining that through the day and night, will humidity be an issue? A variable speed system in a typically insulated home will likely be running at a very low level most of the day.

I can see it being a problem if I come back from vacation and change the thermostat from 85 to 73 and ask the A/C to get there ASAP, but even then the controller could know how much moisture is in the air and make sure the temperature drop is slow enough to deal with condensation.
Yeah I guess we all anthropomorphize our favorite creatures
From the video it looked like it would be pretty simple to lift the tiny pin wafers into the pin decoding region if there's nothing stopping you from over-lifting.
Strangely I can't find a corporate website, but I think Happy Lamb hot pot is a global company. They have one near me just outside of Portland, Oregon and they're fantastic.

UK Website: https://happylambuk.com/
Australian: https://happylamb.com.au/
Beaverton Google Maps: https://goo.gl/maps/pYJDrL3ZmP2oHNiU9

Same Logos, but no centralized site. Maybe because it's a chinese company and my search isn't finding their Chinese website.
Conditional probability applies to many things
Don't forget a big part of this is the dependent on the image of you the recipient has in their head.
In candor, I only skimmed them, and all I saw was "the reasons lines repel certain birds is not fully understood". When I submitted the article here, part of me was hoping someone would know or speculate why and share with us..
Maybe Netdata will work for you. Very happy user.

https://www.netdata.cloud/

https://learn.netdata.cloud/docs/agent/collectors/#apm-appli...

Hosted / Selfhosted

Demo instance:
https://london.my-netdata.io/
I think you can technically mitigate some concerns for the people who understand that, but practically it's going to be a very different story. People will believe who/what they believe, and an expert opinion on trustworthiness is unlikely to change that.

I think being in the real world and meeting real people is the only way to create a real, functional society. Allowing people to drift away into their own AI supported worlds would eventually make cooperation very difficult. I think it would just accelerate the tendency we've seen with social media, creating ever more extreme positions and ideologies.
I think the GP is claiming that the 3AC logo is a reference to the Three Arrows[1] logo, which was used by the SPD in Weimar Germany and by some flavors of contemporary anarchists. But I can't find any evidence that it's an intended reference, and they look pretty different to me (different colors and directions; the only similarity is that they both happen to have arrows).

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Arrows
Abortions are a constitutional right or were before this ruling

As for the 2nd amendment many people think it didn't necessarily refer to an individual right
One of the things that has been bothering me for a while is Hollywood’s obsession with throwing sex scenes into every movie. It bothers me because this makes them unwatchable with my children.

Two examples: Queen’s Gambit an Battlestar Galactica (the one with James Olmos). Both wonderful stories. The sex scenes are utterly unnecessary. There’s even an oral sex scene in one of Galactica’s episodes.

What the fuck is wrong with these people?

Also, for all their purported values they sure have no problem at all exploiting women in such ways.

This isn’t about being a prude at all. I am not. The sex and objectification of women in movies adds nothing valuable to the story and is a net negative for society. If you don’t agree, just wait until you have a daughter to view the world they are exposed to with a different perspective.
That other thing wouldn’t have enough energy to make a comparable crater
Overall it is a great tool and I completely do not get the hate for it, but I did have some issues with AWS EKS - we made two mistakes in our project by using k8s API instead of DNS for discovery and environmental variables instead of config maps and this ended up overloading master nodes, which started throttling sporadically, eapecially with load spikes. It seemed like AWS EKS support team were really puzzled by this and it took us weeks to get to the root cause, even with their support. This might be considered as more of an AWS issue than k8s one.
It's understandable why you "hide" these costs from the user, but it would be nice to know they exist.

This offer here would be something I'd look into, except learning it hurts the library more than expected is a downer.
Toyota also uses ZF transmissions a lot, but more importantly, the new Toyota Supra is basically co-developed with BMW from their Z4 sports car
The most annoying problem is CI, i cannot even use a private git submodule in Github Actions without creating a personal token, passing it to secret and use some git command
If a video is already cryptographcally signed, then you can safely distribute the signature on an untrusted channel.

Adding Blockchain into the mix is superfluous, and destroys scalability.
HFSP = Have fun staying poor
I wouldn't call OPEC a union, but I would call it a cartel, just like labor unions are.
FTC takes action against CafePress for data breach cover up
Lol, install a spyware app to opt out of their spyware? Something something Inception?
>Someone mints a token which contains revenge porn, or PII, or whatever - just basically "bad stuff" about you, without your permission. Unfortunately, now it's permanently on the blockchain. There is no way to take it down, even if the culprit goes to jail.

I could also go write bad things about you and pay someone to launch it into orbit where it will be similarly stable. I could find the sequence in PI that encodes your personal social security number and shout it in a crowded room and you can't ever delete that information either, no matter how small of a jail cell you put me in. This isn't a bug, it's a feature. This also prevents governments from deciding who you are and are not allowed to transact with, whether your money is worth less today than it was yesterday, and whether you can spend your money (power) how you want to.

>You can send people tokens that contain smart contracts which are written to wipe our wallet if you accidentally interact with it. There is no way to refuse one of these tokens.

You're going to need to explain what you think you're saying here, because this is not a property of any well constructed crypto system in existence.

>When you learn about how amateur all of the crypto ecosystem actually is, like in terms of its fundamental design, you realize that it's simply not that useful.

Yes, crypto is more difficult to use than the fiat economy alternatives, at least right now. Technology is rarely very useful when it's first developed and especially so in cases where a strong network effect is required for it to be useful in the first place.

All I can say is that I much prefer a future in which the global financial system is owned by all of us as opposed to a global financial system owned by corporate financial fiefdoms where you no longer have Dollars and Euros and Yen but instead corporate scrip owned and manipulated by powerful financial megacorporations. Make no mistake - the era of the nation-state is ending and the era of the market-state is beginning and the decisions we make now about what kind of limitation on power to build into the system will be felt for centuries to come.
Too many indexes can cause significant performance problems if RAM is short. If the indexes are actually used (rather than sitting idle on disk because other indexes are better choices for all your applications' typical queries) then they will “compete” for memory potentially causing a cache thrashing situation.

But yes, the issue with too many indexes is more often that they harm write performance.

A related issue is indexes that are too wide, either covering many columns or “including” them. As well as eating disk space they also eat extra memory (and potentially cause extra IO load) when used (less rows per page, so more pages loaded into RAM for the same query).

Both problems together, too many indexes many of which are too wide, usually comes from blindly accepting recommendations from automated tools (particularly when they are right that there is a problem, and it is a problem that a given index may solve, but fixing the queries so existing indexes are useful could have a much greater effect than adding the indexes).
It’s disheartening - you have good intentions but almost everything you say is backwards.

Regulation on Apple only is the opposite of encouraging competition, it’s literally calling shots against the only fighter that’s pushing back on Chrome in a significant way - on market share, and maybe more importantly, on privacy and avoiding bloating web standards to further avoid total lock-in on V8.

Second, Apple has been accelerating greatly Safari development for years now and I worry your entire organization can’t admit it’s actually a great browser and has rapidly caught up in terms of correctness and features, and is now in fact leading in many ways. That it rejects some proposals isn’t inherently wrong, by the way, and the reasoning for many is just. I’m afraid if you admitted that, it’d pop a bubble in one of your core tenets, and given you made this mission driven thing with a single purpose, you’re sort of now forced into an intellectually dishonest place.

Because as a long time web develop myself who went from IE to Firefox to Chrome to Safari as my main browsers over the years, there’s simply *no doubt* that Safari as of a year or two ago started whooping Chromes ass. Like not even close, it feels like a different type of thing. It’s insanely fast, across so many dimensions, lighter, and I don’t get incompatibility almost ever anymore.

Your mission would achieve the opposite of what it wants - Apples platform isn’t a monopoly, Google's are. Google has a monopoly on Search, Browsers, and influence on the web. This would only strengthen the worse/stronger fighter. And it's all premised on a fundamentally unsound critique of Safari.
Well duh.

They're '...doing it for the children!'

Mmmhm.