skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Almost none of that ecosystem is relevant to kernel.

What exactly leads you to believe that?

From the Rust 2021 survey, 2420 said they use nightly to access one or more language features they need, 1028 claimed a Crate dependency requires it, and 876 claimed a tool they use requires it.

This, from a sample pool where around 3k users out of around 10k claim they use a nightly version.
If that was wokeness there wouldn't be a problem.
Netflix licenses and resells content not streams.

I think a lot of people in this thread are too fixated on the idea of “streams” and they have lost the plot. Netflix is a content producer and licensor. The streams are just a means to deliver that content.
So put systems like that at the end of the list?

And they'll require renegotiation or hardware upgrades at some point, so use that as leverage to say no government entities will buy any more unless they meet certain rules about open sourcing and data storage.

But really, if a handful of things like that were the only examples that would be wonderful.
This seems like an anti-pattern.

I usually tell people that sleeps only belong in one place in their code and they should make linters complain if it pops up anywhere else. The place is the method they call to poll. And even then it's better to wait for something than poll to see if we're ready.

This, though, seems to be trying to sleep to slow down frame rate. What the? Maybe it's intended as some way to make all users' experiences suck equally even if they have fast boxes. Maybe. And depending on the actual scenario maybe it makes sense to handle this with a "better" sleep.

The problem as stated is not a solved problem because it's not generally anything anyone would want to do.

In fact, people might have left this intentionally hard to do to discourage its use.
Didn't "13 Reasons Why" literally lead to increased suicide rates among youth[1]?

[1] https://www.nimh.nih.gov/news/science-news/2019/release-of-1...
If you ever wonder what el nino /la nina means in terms of weather for your hemisphere, here is a heuristic:

La niña is the opposite of el Niño.

El niño (spanish - "the boy") is the name used by inhabitants of the area it hits the hardest, South America (mostly spanish speaking).

The western part of South America has its usual rainy season from late Dec to April.

The "el nino" boy is a reference to birth of Jesus. Chrstianity is the predominant faith in most of south america, so christmas is celebrated by all. Fishermen would thus say Jesus' birth brought extra "gifts" in the form of a stronger and longer rainy season, starting from late Dec.

So the the Spanish baby jesus boy brings brings miracle heat and rain upon his birth.

Invert the weather for la nina.

Now you you know what it means to you if you live in an affected area.

Edit - took out wrong statement about northern hemisphere
Man, we are trying.
When I was young, I tried to climb a geodescic dome-type structure on the playground. But I tried to climb it inverted — along the inside of the dome.

I about made it — but dropped onto my back and had the wind knocked out of me. First time I had ever experienced that scary sensation.

Times.
I don't disagree with anything you've said there I just don't think it has absolutely anything to do with "wokeness". That's just the latest meme everyone loves to throw around.
It wasnt written by the WEF or anyone who works for the WEF, the story was written by danish MP Ida Auken. The stated goal of the exercise was to provoke thought. Which Id say it has done.
The landscape has changed (or to pun... the netscape?).

We now have genuine browser competition. I think Safari and Firefox are just enough to say Chrome is not a monopoly. I write this on FF right now (running on Ubuntu) because it is a viable alternative.

This is the case for now, might be different in 2023.

"X is free" is not enough to be a problem on it's own.
I think this article came to me just when I needed it. I've been struggling whether to frame the services I offer as emotional conflict resolution, communication, or leadership, and after reading this article, I feel a lot more at peace that these skills may swirl together. I agree with the author that I've found it hard to distinguish which skills are being employed, because many are in such short interactions.

I also feel a lot more confident in that the person in the story seemed to mostly be saying how she was feeling and how she imagined the other person was feeling—which is the core of the work I do.

I feel a lot more hopeful and excited that no matter what I call the services, they may help people, and I wouldn't have found this article at this time were it not for HN. So, thank you, HN friends.
Why Stocks, Crypto, and Home Values Are All Plunging at Once
No need for recursion or multi-threading: If you call the function in a loop and don't release the escaped local unter after the loop, and if the number of loop iterations isn't statically known, then it's impossible to pre-allocate heap storage for that local variable.
> this applies to literally no service you have ever used. doesn't apply to steam. doesn't apply to microsoft office. doesn't apply to photoshop. why should it apply to netflix?

Does any of those services have "multiple simultaneous streams" plans? I'm paying Netflix for 4 simultaneous streams (their naming: "Number of screens you can watch on at the same time") and they should not care where I utilize their offer.
I agree. The context of this comment is the user asking if Web assembly will make that effort easier. I don't think it will since getting good JS is already reasonable.
They had first mover advantage when it came to streaming video on-demand. They did see the writing on the wall that they needed their own catalog, but I think they hyperoptimized for quantity over quality. Netflix has a deep bench of originals, but so few are actually really good. Compare and contrast that with a service like Apple TV+. They have a smaller catalog, but their content, to me, is typically higher quality (Ted Lasso is a standout, For All Mankind is spectacular, etc).

They lost the plot when they decided they couldn't just be a distributor but also a creator. They went too hard too fast and they don't have compelling content.
Thirty Years After Its Defeat, the Khalistan Movement Fights on in Cyberspace
I honestly don’t understand why so many people are up in arms about a company enforcing their contract.

If you bought a sort of “family pass” to a movie theater that allowed your family to watch unlimited movies, you wouldn’t expect to be able to pass the family pass around to other families.

Netflix is literally just the digital version of a family pass to a movie theater. Everything is priced according to models of single households using single accounts, down to the licensing costs and royalties.
There are a large number of good movies on Netflix. It may not turn over as quickly as HBO's content, but the number of them is probably comparable. Try scrolling through some of the major categories and keep count of the "good" movies. *

The place Netflix really shines for me is the acquisition of non-US content. I particularly like political dramas from other countries. Even if some smaller countries aren't producing content that is quite as polished as we might expect here in the US, that's some of the charm, seeing how they make shows.

* I can't defend the browsing of Netflix -- that's just ridiculous
I got the tail end of this glorious era - even in to the early 90s we had magnificent structures almost this big, with swings that made you feel like you could touch the stars because the chains were so long. The entire class sprinted to the playground every recess period. There was a broken arm every 4-5 years, but I sure felt like it was worth the risk. And still do. The late 90s brought about rapid change and by the time I graduated high-school in 2000 nobody used the “playground” because it was just boring after being ripped apart and replaced with safe alternatives like giant tic-tac-toe boards.

Edit: added a sentence for clarity.
I remember those; especially the smell. Nobody ever cleaned inside them. Definitely built up your immune system though! Just imagine what the bacterial load in those things was.

edit: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/6b/ee/e1/6beee1f814110c0dd902...
Despite its size, the "Python's Global Interpreter Lock or GIL, still allows only one thread to hold the control of the Python interpreter at any one time."
Yup, a custom cookiecutter template saves ton of time.

I created this one to create a production ready Django project in few minutes: https://github.com/Mittal-Analytics/django-cookiecutter

Things this does:
- README.md: setup readme with development setup
- Django split settings: split settings for local, testing and production
- Split requirements: split requirements.txt for local and production
- Pre-commit hooks: setup pre-commit hooks for black and pyflakes
- django-envoiron: database config and secrets in environment
- editorconfig: sensible tab/space defaults for html, js and python files
- remote-setup: setup hosting on uberspace
- git push deployment: `git push live` makes the changes live
- github actions for tests: run tests automatically on Github
There's Woke Capitalism, with a lot of large corporations leaning into it.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/28/opinion/corporate-america...
Nope, you’re paying Netflix for a single household license with up to 4 simultaneous streams.

You’re too fixated on this stream limit. It’s not the only limit of the contract, even if you wish that was the case.
I grew up playing in the woods, away from more urban environments, and eventually started a family in a very urban environment. It was very jarring to discover what people tend to think is acceptable for kids to get up to; letting my 4 year old climb a “big kid” slide seemingly caused several people to think I was indirectly attempting infanticide or something.

I climbed very high trees and nearly shit myself trying to get back down. Sometimes I fell out of trees. I built dangerous forts. I started fires and cooked fish on them. I cut sticks with knives and shot at bottles with a small gun or a sling shot.

My kids have no idea what this stuff is like and how sheltered they are. I try to get them out in the world, I take one of them spearfishing and harvesting out in the ocean, we fish a bit, but ultimately they really are quite soft.

I have a feeling we don’t need to send our kids up trees and make them cook fish on a fire to “harden up”, but adversity in various forms and the opportunity to overcome it either with a group or independently seems invaluable to developing kids. I do get the sense (even from my wife) that this attitude isn’t so broadly accepted or comfortable for people.

I even volunteered with a scouting group in hopes my kids might find some good opportunities, but it was extremely mellow. Nice people, some great camp fire talk, but the kids were free to complain their way out of difficult tasks or discomfort and mostly played magic cards or sat lazily through activities we’d put together.

Parents were quick to complain to us if their kids expressed that they had to do anything they disliked. For example, a moderate hike or carrying water buckets for their camp mates.

I’m not sure. Is it such a big deal? Am I myopic and assuming my youth experience had more value than theirs?

Sometimes I wonder if I wouldn’t be better off if my childhood was a little more demanding, really. I don’t mean this in a masculine context specifically, but I often feel soft. Lack of discipline, unwilling to face discomfort, etc. Perhaps my perspective on the entire matter is limited and/or poor to begin with.

I’ve read quite a bit of childhood psychology around these matters from the likes of Steve Biddulph and D.W. Winnicott but I think I could stand to read quite a bit more.

These kinds of topics always remind me of the sort of cyclical silliness evident in this quote:

The children now love luxury; they have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise. Children are now tyrants, not the servants of their households. They no longer rise when elders enter the room. They contradict their parents, chatter before company, gobble up dainties at the table, cross their legs, and tyrannize their teachers.

— Socrates
I wont blame wokeness for Netflix's shows being terrible. I will say that for some reason a ton of terribly written shows were greenlit by Netflix and they happened to be woke. I'm guessing that writing that appeals to everyone in your political bubble is easier to get greenlit than actually good writing that might actually make you question your beliefs in some manner.
Just search for "food grade grease," no reason to go through Kitchenaid.
Religious structures commonly ascend upward in a pyramid/cone shape, toward a point. This seems to map to a hierarchy of human values, in order to symbolize the supreme value that should guide a person and society (e.g. a supreme all-powerful, life-giving consciousness).
This advice may not be helpful as I'm not a person with ADHD (though I've struggled with deep procrastination), but journalling (and most other regular tasks) can become more difficult if you see it as a task that you "must" do for self-betterment.

I would focus on motivation to start (it can relieve the emotional pain from having negative thoughts cloud your mind all the time), commit to imperfection (just half a page is fine), and reduce small friction in the way (e.g. keep an open notebook in an easy-to-access place with a pen readily available).

Also consider making the act of writing a pleasurable experience. This can be done with a nice pen, doesn't need to be fountain, and high-quality paper. You can also be honest with yourself about whether it's helpful in your experience; you can feel free to stop if it becomes something you dread, versus something you enjoy and look forward to (or at least feel neutral about in tougher times).
You have no idea what you're talking about. JSX is a line for line transform. It's literally the simplest implementation of templating that's even possible. The next step is just not having any sort of transform or build time and representing your DOM structure as JS code (which is also an option in React and what a lot of other smaller libraries do).

Your entire argument is arguing for React, not against it.

It makes no sense that you complain about magic then ask why dependencies need to be passed into hooks. How do you think other libraries avoid that quirk? Magic. Computed properties in Vue are opaque build time magic. Templates are build time magic. React is the only library that doesn't have build time magic that you need to treat as a black box.
> “This has nothing to do with you”
Yes, I'm in the sunshine coast and have experienced all of the above. We were cut off from school by flooding for about a week, a drive that usually took 15 minutes was taking at least an hour because of the long detour. And our roof has leaked. At least we didn't need to put water in the pool ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

But the mould ... that was the worst. I'm going to smell of vinegar and clove oil for the rest of my life.
You're right that the Raspberry Pi has become so difficult to find now that I am playing with Teensys again. Probably should experiment with the Raspberry Pi Pico.
> So the "leader" instead of giving constructive feedback just says it's garbage and dismisses it?

The person being dismissive is not the leader in this example. The person who does a judo move accepting the criticism and using it to improve the article, the working relationship, and the conversation is the leader.
The latest version (APU6) has an SFP port, https://ipng.ch/s/articles/2021/07/19/pcengines-apu6.html

M.2 NVME mod, https://github.com/florolf/apu-m2
We tried to eliminate grief by decree and now we wonder why everyone is depressed.
Whether you allocate or not is a property of the language, not the GC. A lot of GC'd languages encourage or even force allocations all over the place. But maybe we could do better in a new language.
I'm talking specifically about Netflix produced content. The stuff that Netflix acquires or licenses is extremely expensive.
Oh wow. The colours of my childhood. Thanks for digging that up, I felt 5 for a few seconds.
Yeah, comments underneath this are similar.

Doesn't make sense, it's a fairly short article that starts with a story and how to resolve it, adding some explanation as well. Very good formula.
Show HN: PipeRider, data reliability automated tool
GitHub: https://github.com/InfuseAI/piperider
Introduction in depth: https://blog.infuseai.io/data-reliability-automated-with-pip...
I'd seen a decent modular 3d printed tower for growing things like lettuce and it turns out Hoocho is using a newer and more advanced style of the same idea:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ak4sb-nRAcE
> What do you expect the Feds to do about the weather?

Intervene and rebalance the water markets, which are currently unsustainable based on bad decades-old science.
Yeah, the cost of running the company (software, server, marketing, sales, etc..) is important. ARR never shows the true picture.
I took his book as disingenuous. "How to have difficult conversations" ... to change the minds of people who are wrong per definition.
> There was also this terrible show that got instantly cancelled called Sense 8. The first scene of that show was this absurd sex scene where a woman was having sex with a trans-woman using a dildo and the dildo flops onto the ground and is soaked in some disgusting fluid.

Ok, but they also have a very heteronormative show Sex/Life that's equally trashy and lowbrow, maybe the issue isn't the "wokeness?"
It's not really just northern/southern hemisphere.
It's also linked to location.

Australia gets the opposite weather to South America for the cycle.

So for La Nina, it's dry in South America, but wet here in Australia.
Academics and industry both have their share of problematic personality types of various flavors. If there's a single piece of advice I'd relate to young people going into either academics or industry, it would be to adopt professionalism - which is unfortunately a bit difficult to define precisely and which varies a bit from place to place and job to job.

For example, in an academic laboratory or and industrial laboratory setting, one basic common rule is just don't create problems that other people have to clean up. Clean up your own messes and try to avoid making new ones. This doesn't just apply to dishes in the sink, but also to interpersonal relationships.

Another part of professionalism is to learn to recognize dead-end no-win situations. Typically this would involve an academic adviser who is a dishonest fraudulent con artist who sabotages anyone who points out flaws in their work, or an industry supervisor who is an egotistic twit who plays favorites and needs a daily ego massage, or something like that. Just exit immediately once you realize what's up, don't waste your time fighting battles with such clods, unless you like tilting at windmills. A careful study of the potential employer in academia or industry can help with recognizing the danger signs before you sign up. Again, that's professionalism: don't commit to a situation until you feel good about it, and if not, politely decline and move on.

If you do happen to luck into a decent situation where you're not stuck with working for a psychopathic personality type, still stick to a professional attitude. If you do go to someone for help, and they take an hour of their time to explain things to you, be absolutely sure that you then spend three hours of your own time solidifying that knowledge - don't go asking the same question again because you forgot to take notes or whatever, that's sure to irritate people and make future help less likely.

As far as academics vs. industry, I'd say academics is where the real nasty political infighting is more common, although I'm sure industry has its share. People fight over lab space, imagined or real slights, grants, you name it. Woe to the grad student or postdoc who gets caught up between two pissy professors out to do damage to each other by any means necessary, for example. Really every incoming grad student should have to take Institutional Politics 101 just to know what to watch out for.
Of course it's bad. Noone who put up their work as open source wants some huge company taking it and selling it to get even more competitive advantage and influence in the world. And that's without mentioning the people who put that into their license pretty much explicitly. Taking GPL code and getting away with it is a failure of our justice system, and that can't be made right with throwing pennies at developers.
Yea that makes sense! It is definitely a 'device' you want to work no matter what.
I think a lot of people are focusing too much on whether an AI could ever be creative or transformative or not (FWIW I'm convinced they can't). But it's not relevant - a lazy human programmer could easily infringe by copying snippets of copyrighted code too.

If anyone shows an example of co-pilot automatically producing something too closely resembling copyrighted code that's too significant to be fair use, you got a problem regardless of what technology got you there.

If that lazy programmer "toils" away behind a corporate wall (sadly too likely), you might never know what he's up to. But you've put his "work" on display and let anyone on the internet record his behavior with this thing.

At some point, co-pilot is going to be able to "suggest" something that's traceable and someone's going to sue. I think it will come down to whether what gets produced is copyrightable or fair use, not whether it was an AI or not that scraped and copied it.
Good old apple cider vinegar! Good for battling those annoying pantry moths, and good for salads.
Fascinating! Thanks for sharing, Daniel!
ORMs definitely don't help! In my first dev role I worked at a C# shop and everything was through Entity Framework. You can't take that skill with you if you change languages to Python, or Haskell, or whatever, but the core SQL skills to follow you around. It's worth the effort, I think (and it's not particularly hard to get semi-decent at SQL!).
A partner who is an ethical person typically would respect boundaries, and avoid snooping (e.g. reading journals and going through unattended laptops/phones). However, as a failsafe (e.g. the person has a lapse in judgement, they're drunk, or is typically great to be with but struggles with snooping), just don't commit anything offensive or relationship-ending to long-term storage.

For example, if you're having doubts about a relationship or feel concern about a sensitive subject to the other person, you can write your thoughts to work it out on a separate piece of paper to securely dispose of after, or (similar to a suggestion elsewhere in the comments) a text file that isn't saved or gets deleted after.

Some may argue for great openness about thoughts in a relationship, but I think it's often useful to work things out on your own to clarify your thoughts and position, before a crucial discussion.
Yikes... Have you ever heard of some of the alternatives?

I self-host Plausible which is GDPR compliant and gives me all of the features that Google Analytics is actually good for. There is so much bloat in GA that provides absolutely no extra value.

I'm skeptical that this is a bad deal for EU citizens.

[EDIT] missing and
If it is physical location, that is something you cannot possibly know for a user, due to VPNs. You might know that a person is logged in and registered with a US address, but you don't know if they are traveling (they might even VPN via the US because it is convenient for work).

So I guess you need to assume this applies for all visitors.
...in USA.
That's assuming a European GDPR-compliant alternative to Google analytics wouldn't arise. But of course it will. It's not even a very difficult product to build. If anything this is both sticking it to Google and creating opportunities for European startups to fill the void.