skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
government entities only have deficit

if they have any spare funds, they will find a way to spend them

it's wonderful to not be bound by the profitability rigidities
Depends. Usually yes. Also wallet return rates are high / Finland.
Typing on a Scrambled Keyboard
Kotlin has a crude support for native, and they had to reboot the implementation as they got clever and went with a memory model incompatible with JVM and JS GCs, thus making code portability an headache.
I know it's a cliche, but I always thought that expensive clothes that scream brands (LV, Gucci, etc) are for poor people who want to look rich.
This, absolutely. Different people have different preferences, and a lot of folks can be surprised at the sheer variety of options out there. People also have different preferences about how many, hm, visible? accommodations they like; some like 'em, some don't (me).

Would set up a casual meeting with him to go over what he'd prefer, see what works best for the two of you and the company, and go from there. A big part of dignity is feeling like you have some choice in the matter, to echo OP.
I strongly commend "The Technique of Clear Writing" by Robert Gunning. I don't think it's in print anymore, but copies are still inexpensively available through Amazon and elsewhere.
Welcome to Gilead.
Frontpage of HN, 2nd product of the day on Product Hunt, featured on Ruby Weekly
Does anyone know of a diff to the leaked draft?
Roe & Wade is based on the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution. Roe vs Wade did not happen in vacuum, it's part of a larger understanding of the Constitution that recognizes a right to privacy and recognizes that there are unwritten rights[1].

This decision overturns this whole 50-year old framework. Decisions based on 14th Amendment’s Due Process clause are now open for banning contraception, banning interracial relationships, family relationships, right to intimacy (sodomy laws), the right to personal control of medical treatment. It will even have data collection limit consequences.

Some states are even more radical than current SCOTUS. They have sodomy laws considered invalid that can be activated. How Dismantling Roe Puts Interracial Marriage at Risk https://www.aclu.org/podcast/how-dismantling-roe-puts-interr...

---

[1]: The idea of unenumerated rights is clear and sound. The Ninth Amendment suggests that the rights enumerated in the Constitution do not exhaust “others retained by the people.”
I think Monero is closest to being the perfect cryptocurrency. Complete privacy, fast and cheap transactions, truly decentralized. Now if only we could get people to use it.
Apparently it’s now illegal to get an abortion in Missouri, my state.

I’ve thought a lot about this, and it does make sense for it to be up to each individual state. I don’t like it, but it’s in line with the principles that the country was founded on.

It’s strange suddenly waking up one day and not being able to do a thing that you used to have an option to do.
I tried it but they seem to be for people with longer torsos
I'm not condoning all the illegal stuff that happens with Bitcoin, to be clear, but just because a government says something is illegal, doesn't mean it should be. For example we're happy in the U.S. (well most of us I think) to be freed from oppressive rulers who taxed without representation, and something like Bitcoin would have been quite useful in that situation. There are many countries who are in a similar situation.
This is called the "Travel Rule", and it's part of an international effort to regulate crypto transfers analogously to bank transfers. When you send a wire transfer, you include the address of the recipient and your bank includes your address in the transfer.

It's technically a FINCEN/FINTRAC requirement in the US and Canada, but they imposed the rule before any of the tooling existed... so there's a bit of a scramble happening right now to figure out how to comply with the rule. Coinbase put together a consortium with other centralized exchanges in an attempt to create a common standard that should hopefully reduce the manual work required by customers, but this is absolutely not isolated to them.
That's what it was when they came down with Roe originally, they are just returning to NOT being a legislative body and returning this decision to where it belongs.... the legislature.
Yep!

The scale I have seen used includes the terms “mild, moderate, severe, profound”…

… ah. Here’s a chart that might help:

https://www.asha.org/public/hearing/degree-of-hearing-loss/

I’m not an audiologist so while this is a great question I don’t have these answers at my fingertips :)

At any rate, my “definition” was intended to clarify what mainstream meant in this context.
If only rust caught blogging security errors.

It's a terrible idea to post a photo of your child with her name on your public blog.

It's one of those subtle security things that the rust compiler helps with; but not here, sadly.
Right! The world is so accessible nowadays. You can travel light and far without much money. You don't have to rely on hotels and travel agencies to find a place to live and get information about the area.
I'm a Christian and I've engaged people many times on this platform about this very issue. In fact your insinuation is so contrary to the truth I find it hard to believe you could possibly believe it in good faith!

Let me start with this: why should we as rational human beings assume life doesn't begin at conception? Is there a more logical place to ascribe life beginning, whether it be human or otherwise?
I wish we would just stop using phone numbers as the primary user identifier and SMS as the primary communication channel, period.

The amount of cruft involved in SMS delivery is unbelievable, and phone numbers are neither particularly stable, nor particularly well protected against takeovers.
Yes. I actually am. They both smoked it. She said it seemed fine. He went insane. They tested him. Weed was only thing in system.
Full blown psychosis. He had God talking to him. He was God. He was going to have hurt my daughter in divine punishment. He crapped in the tub. His computer was all powerful and was controlling the world. He showed up at his work to hurt them. That's when we found out about it. He got hauled off to a mental facility where they had to keep him tied down for multiple days. Kept trying to hurt the staff. When he stopped being violent, he was still highly delusional for a solid month.

https://www.brightquest.com/cannabis-induced-psychosis/psych....

Bottom line, he can never touch weed again. They can't be around people that do.
They've lost most of their friends. Friends didn't agree about them giving up weed. They are starting to make new friends.

They are doing far better now.
Men are still lawfully required to register for the draft for military service (even though active conscription is currently on hold since 1973). It could be argued that being sent into war is life threatening.

This was upheld very recently in 2019. [0]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Coalition_for_Men_v._...
Yes. Because it's not about the mom. It's not about the dad. It's about the baby's life.
I will never understand why people choose to have business meetings in the first place. In every scenario that doesn’t include personal introductions, everyone would be better off collaborating digitally.

Perhaps we are still missing the tools to do that effectively.

Crucially, I don’t mean we need another face-to-face/mouth-to-ear communication tool, or yet another way to write the same documents together. We need a new paradigm for thinking collaboratively, and tools to support that.

There’s your free billion dollar idea for today.
honestly, this scares this shit out of me.

lossy compression is one thing, but to just say that an ML model suggests making pixels like this vs a mathematical formula is totally different things.
Some of the surfer brands like Volcom, Reef, Lost etc sell wovens with little tiny logos on the pocket you can remove with a thread-ripper. I think that's not rare, though. Pretty sure you can even remove logos from some of the jeans. I guess I should also probably plug the lightweight pants from Club Monaco that I'm wearing right now because I don't see a logo on them. MUJI is also nice and unlabeled, still Japanese sensibility but a little more eclectic (their linen pillowcases are great).
Ah yea, the store of value routinely moves 10% in an hour, and I’m the one being fallacious.
> they never put abortion into the constitution to firmly protect it

Neither party has had the votes to do that in a while (2/3rds in both the House and the Senate). It must also be ratified by 3/4ths of the states (38 right now).

Not going to happen for a long time.

Edit: Quick scan show the last time a party had 2/3rds majority in both was 1965-1967 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_divisions_of_United_Stat...)
And it's the current Supreme Court's prerogative to establish that specific religion, and forbid religious practice of, say, Judaism where the life of child and mother are weighed compassionately and abortions are permitted in certain cases.
That sort of thing is very country-specific - in the UK, for example, all bank holidays (except 25-26 December), are set by law on Monday or Friday. That's not the case in most European countries.
Blacks gaining rights was done primarily via constitutional amendment and later civil rights acts, all passed by the legislative branch. Some believe the courts did in fact go too far during 60s.

Women I believe were always allowed to work, so I'm not sure what this example has to do with anything?

Women being allowed to vote was done via constitutional amendment, again, by the legislative branch.

If you think marriage should be redefined and repurposed so it is not primarily about rearing one's own children, then, by all means, get it redefined, but, do it via legislation, not judicial activism.
Then does the fact that the constitution allows different religions in the U.S. "force" the Catholic church to not provide communion to non-believers?
> I know this can be interpreted differently

You answered your own question. It's the interpretation that matters. The Supreme Court is a joke.

Political debates have not been done in good faith in the US for decades. It's no longer about the people - it's about fooling the people into getting amped up about things and voting one way or the other. It's like a wrestling match. Does it really matter who wins if it's all fake? Actually I take this back: being a wrestler actually needs some sort of prep and physical conditioning. Wrestling is better than politics.
Are your target users currently using Grammerly or Outwrite or other AI to improve writing?

These AI platforms are targeting improved writing as well. Not just fixing a missing comma, but suggesting sentences be re-written to be made clearer. Also offering suggestions on how these can be re-written.

Something I'm seeing in YC companies is often completely ignoring existing competitors or would be competitors in the next year or two.

How could you write all about your product and no mention any of the existing AI tools, even if just to say "we're better than using X because [a,b,c]"?

Perhaps you have something so completely different and better, but if you don't address that, it seems like you've just got blinders on.
It needs to be removed from the law -- personal faith is fine. A simple test for those that disagree: are you okay with Islamic Law becoming codified in our legal system too?
"There's a lot of people that believe that abortion is the killing of a human being. And killing another human being is, most definitely, on the list of "bad things" for every flavor of Christianity."

A lot of them seem to have no problem with killing human beings in war, or in executions, or killing done by police, or the killing of various human beings they hate (from "druggies" to gays to muslims or Mexicans).

As George Carlin said:

"Pro-life conservatives are obsessed with the fetus from conception to 9 months. After that, they don’t wanna know about you. They don’t wanna hear from you. No nothing! No neonatal care, no daycare, no Head Start, no school lunch, no food stamps, no welfare, no nothing. If you’re pre-born, you’re fine, if you’re preschool, you’re fucked."
"recognizes that there are unwritten rights."

Basically...legislating from the Bench. This has no place in constitutional jurisprudence.
Firstly, the 2nd amendment.... was an AMENDMENT to the constitution. Second, the right of abortion was determined from incorporation of other guaranteed rights (here, the right to privacy). Please either brush up on your undergrad political science course materials or review summaries of decisions via the Library of Congress.

Coming poorly equipped to these arguments shows much more about the individual than their interpretation of constitutionality.
> For completeness: if you do have a technological solution to an economic and political problem, you have created a new political problem (for yourself): getting everyone to use and understand your solution.

I'm not so sure about that. I mean, for example, fusion energy would solve a fair few of economic problems and would be a major part of the solution to the political problem of the climate crisis. I imagine there are a few other technological advances that would fit in like that too.

Very far aside: fusion energy may be closer than we think : https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/your-book-review-the-f...
What problem are we talking about?
What action comes before a pregnancy?
Pretty much. Roe V Wade took authority from the state and gave it to the individual. Repealing Roe V Wade potentially takes the choice away from the individual and gives it to the state.
Great idea! I will consider that in the future (could be even useful for me)
> The optimal implementation might be imperative

There are times when it isn't.

I'm thinking of Richard Bird's functional pearl, The Smallest Free Number, where the divide-and-conquer algorithm is faster than the imperative one.

From the conclusion:

One of the differences between a pure functional algorithm designer and
a procedural one is that the former does not assume the existence of arrays
with a constant-time update operation, at least not without a certain amount
of plumbing. For a pure functional programmer, an update operation takes
logarithmic time in the size of the array.1 That explains why there sometimes
seems to be a logarithmic gap between the best functional and procedural
solutions to a problem. But sometimes, as here, the gap vanishes on a closer
inspection.

The ability to arrive at the divide-and-conquer algorithm is quite fascinating as it uses plain, boring old mathematics and is, for some, quite straight-forward to derive on one's own.

Yet people are more convinced by imperative implementations. I'm curious why this is. Is it because we "teach" people to believe programs are executed sequentially and are therefore somehow "inherently" imperative? Or is it easier to reason about algorithms in terms of their operational semantics?
ChenSort is lexicographically smaller than timsort.
Im pulling out of coinbase. They are more difficult to use than my local bank at this point. No thanks.
The only place you might see substantial discussion is a message board for legal scholars/students. The next week minimum online in almost all americancentric forums is going to be about primal screaming from one side, and arrogant gloating from the other.
> Your job is to argue that abortion is not murder.

Sure, and your job is to argue that abortion causes the death of a viable human life.

Murder is defined as "the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another."

Abortion isn't that.
Interesting this field is changed significantly last 20 years.

One thing is light pollution need to buy a big telescope if you can't transport it to the dark place. You have to drive 100+ from a big city.

Second is advanced image processing with deep learning. There is no need for accurate sky tracker anymore, you just shot many images and software combines.
Thanks for this idea, gonna have to start doing the same
I can get a receptionist to type "make a save button" into a jira ticket when the customer asks for it (that's more than some PO's I've had have done, some would just copy and paste the email from the customer into the ticket providing no additional context or clarification), can you get a help desk person to build the app?
Style and looks is just what it is, a shell. And some people use clothing to augment what they are lacking in their character. And smart people can see through that.
I guess you don't like getting soced.
Why not, if he's now free to act as he pleases? The assertion is that he doesn't believe he's acting rightly, but does so under electoral pressure. If I'm naive, please explain: what's to stop him doing as he thinks is right, now that he's appointed?
Dang will probably say this better, but:

>> Remember HN's rules of etiquette <<

If you want to engage using different norms, there are many different places on the internet to do that.
aaah, I haven't considered that! Thanks for the idea!
According to the Bible, the fetus is not a child. Look at the Jewish position on abortion for the details.
So? Most of this is negligible, and can be shielded if the donor cares about this level of privacy - using a VPN, disabling cookies, spoofing your browser client.

The OP is probably talking about personal data such as mass collection of users photo ID, passport, email address, home address, full legal name and gender, telephone number, date of birth. In a standard non-blockchain crowdfund, these are the sort of things each donor would need to first share with PayPal Holdings Inc. - or a similar company - in order to have their donation fulfilled.
If someone contributes to open source, then they shouldn't be surprised that someone else uses this code. The licensing hell is something that shouldn't belong in IT.
I understand that this is primarily an advertisement for Posthog, but if you're going to keep posting it you might want to keep it up to date. There are only 4 countries on your map and one of them is:

> The Dutch Data Protection Authority warns that the use of Google Analytics 'may soon no longer be allowed', after a ruling by the Austrian privacy regulator. A definitive conclusion is said to come at the beginning of 2022.

At least you removed "the only open source product analytics platform" and the Google fonts since the last time a Posthog employee posted it https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29994183
Incorrect. Roe & Wade is based on the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution and recognizes a right to privacy from the government.

This takes rights from people and gives it to individual States.
Like it or not, ever since SCOTUS seized the unconstitutional power to overturn legislation, they have been a political entity, effectively legislating.

The difference with recent rulings is that they've abandoned any pretense of political independence or legitimacy.
> ... which finds that 54% of people think third trimester abortions should be illegal in all cases - including health of the mother - and 65% think most or all abortions should be illegal in the second trimester.

I believe the poll from your source fails to make that distinction. From the article:

> But Dr. Daniel Grossman, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of California, San Francisco, who supports abortion rights, cited research showing that Americans viewed second-trimester abortions more empathetically when told about some of the reasons why women seek them.

So if asked if abortions should be legal in the third trimester, most people would jump to say "no", without considering the context.
The Supreme court enforced slavery - and virtually ensured that the civil war would occur when it expanded slavery with Dredd Scott. (On the basis of something not in the constitution). The legislative made it illegal and changed the constitution. This opens the same path to legislatures. Hopefully without the civil war that occurred because the Supreme court played a role in preserving slavery.

Does nobody read history anymore?
I'd like to agree, but the second multi millionaire you knew lived in one of the wealthiest neighbourhoods in London, and the first multi millionaire you dont know where he lived but has an expensive car and is likely the same.

I've always lived in cheap arsed neighbourhoods, my recent place is above average and it makes a lot of things easier - even if I dont really enjoy the boring corporate neighbours.
My wife is also a physician. The level of care provided to low-income patients is barely existent compared to a state like Massachusetts, both some of the places she has practiced. Have you seen the state of Medicaid in Texas?

Go expose yourself to it and you’ll see how Texas is anti-poor.
> public schools... sell abortions to children

And I thought hallucinogens was a left-wing shtick!

> The left have grown militant

So let me get this straight, the year is 2022, when the Soviet union is gone, the Chinese Communist Party is practicing free market, the percentage of unionised workforce is the lowest it's been since 1917 and the effective corporate tax rate is the lowest it's been in 70 years - this, here, is the time of left-wing world order and militarism?
Assuming two instances of an ML model are trained identically using the same data in the same order and given the same PRNG seeds, they will still operate identically, will they not?

I like your point about the emergent complexity from many-layered systems.
The standard line in conservative politics (that abortion is murder) isn't supportable by the text of the Old Testament, which outlines distinct punishments for murder and for inducing a pregnant woman (unsolicited) to abort. Causing an abortion isn't even sin in the Old Testament; it just yields a fine. And it's true that Jesus doesn't explicitly address any of that to supersede or revise it.

The 'valid Catholic reason' for the a doctrine of ensoulment that prohibits abortion is just papal authority. Different popes, saints, and schools within Catholicism have had different beliefs on ensoulment; it's not like the reasoning has been decisive here.

Fucking up other people's lives for the sake of obeying a series of 'infallible' flip-floppers is in fact embarrassing and not respectable.

And even from a religious perspective, criticizing particular sects of Christianity as unmoored from their own sacred texts and traditions with respect to this issue is a perfectly valid line of critique of those sects and their adherents. That's what the GP is essentially doing, informally asking what the rational connection to the sacred texts and tradition even are on this issue. Just because the Catholic church has an answer to that question doesn't mean it's satisfactory.