skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't think this is the right question. The better question is one of bodily autonomy: whether someone should be compelled to keep another human being alive at the cost of their own health and safety. This avoids the whole "when does life start" debate, which has been a moving goalpost for the history of abortion related law.
I suppose it's a complicated feedback loop of companies following talent and talent following companies, but Miami has been popular with fintech bros, whereas chicago doesn't have the same pull for a lot of reasons, not least of which are taxes, weather, and yes, crime.
> can say things as they are, one of the few things I liked about China as well

Some of the people who live there would disagree with your assessment.
So? Most of this is negligible, and can be shielded if the donor cares about this level of privacy.
a lot packed into that if - eg you are including categories such as rape victims who are expected to die in childbirth, feel like you should be explicit in the true extent of what you're advocating
There’s neither scientific fact nor biblical teaching to support this position though. I often see “Thou shall not murder” as a defense for antiabortion policies, but it takes an unsupported leap to call it murder to begin with. Genesis says that life begins at first breath, which is far after most societies consider abortions legal and moral.

There’s also no indication that people even used to think that life began in utero, and that anything less than a fully formed infant was alive and capable of surviving.
The website kitemaker.co is super laggy in Firefox (101.0.1, Win11) and it slows down other open tabs as well. Not sure if it's just for me
Acknowledging that SCOTUS has always been political is not controversial. But until recently, they "legislated" in a fair way, in order to maintain the appearance of neutrality. I am specifically objecting that change away from the appearance of neutrality, starting circa 2000 in Bush v Gore.
> Republicans aren’t very strongly against those things...

I'm sorry, Republicans aren't strongly against gay marriage?
The very same paragraphs talk about it being comparable among early Christians to such 'grave sins as contraception and sterilization'. How should this inform the relative weight of the use of condoms and murder, for contemporary Christians?

This doesn't at all support the notion that Christianity has always been concerned with abortion as a corrolary to murder, which is at the center of contemporary conservative religious discourse on the issue.
> I don't see how it's any more relevant than the labor of all the people posting and voting on content.

Moderating a reasonably large subreddit is a lot of work, compared to voting. A bit every day, all days of the year. Reddit even automatically prompts you to review new threads with a lot of participation. I've also received offers for paid (low) jobs from reddit in my inbox for new communities that they wanted to build. Did I mention the drama that ensues when community members aren't happy? "Ban this!" / "Don't censor this!"
This is correct; they originally sponsored the first video (for trade), I forgot to mention they provided the hardware in this follow-up post.

I'll try to remember to add that disclaimer to the post.
> The right of the people to be secure in their persons ... against ... seizures, shall not be violated.

By what power does the government enforce the seizure of a person's reproductive system and require it to be used to breed another life?
iOS does not allow for any meaningful choice, it’s all basically Safari.

Says who?

Mozilla, Google, Microsoft, EFF, the uk regulator, the Japanese regulator, the EU and most importantly the group of people who actually build web software on iOS.
Less abortions + more guns = more deadly crime (soon).

https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Legalized_abortion_and_crime_eff...
It's also not a long-term solution. At some point, your ported number will be updated and flagged as a "voip number" since it's now associated to Google Voice. At that point, you'll start having issues as many services don't like it when people use a number they can acquire for free in a couple minutes as the UID.
To the bank account of the organization you’re donating to? Or to whatever bank account the org would put real money in after they sell the crypto they get
I do scientific modeling. We have classes and hierarchies of different physical components we simulate, like fuel assemblies and pumps and heat exchangers. I guess this falls into the exception of "clone of The Sims or something" so perhaps my complaint is covered.
>> I've never had such consistently terrible Mexican food

This is not an informed take AT ALL. Where have you encountered better Mexican food in the US than at Fonda San Miguel? There is a long list of great Mexican places in Austin with Fonda at the top. IF you have never been, Sunday brunch is the place to start.

There is a longer list of garbage tex-mex joints, that is true, but they are easy to avoid.

>> An[d] the weather, much of the year is unbearable.

This is 1000% correct, or if anything an understatement.
I usually refer to this distinction as "tall" vs. "wide" problems. Tall problems require having at least one exceptional or specialized person to solve it, whereas wide problems can be cleared by most generalist problem-solvers. The time required to solve wide problems is simply one of aggregate bandwidth.

Unfortunately, I think society has a ton of people who can solve super tall problems working on super wide problems, because the largest (and most well-funded) organizations have the widest problems. In some cases they have super tall problems too, but past a certain size the lights stay on by solving the wide problems.
I think you would have better luck arguing the equal protection clause. The commerce clause can be used to strike down a state trying to prevent it's citizens getting abortions in other states, but cannot be used to restrict the laws of a single state.
> After all, the internet can be used by criminals so we should absolutely stay away from it!

The dotcom tech bros must have been trying to persuade typewriters, post offices, etc in 1990s at the time at the near height of the dotcom speculative mania. The skeptics at the time called it a fad at the time and would be no better than using fax machines.

So again the internet is being used by money launderers, scammers, criminals, etc. Does that mean we need to go back to using fax machines?

I think everyone knows the obvious answer to that question.
The Constitution also doesn’t say I am allowed to bear an Ak47, but apparently it’s a constitutionally protected right. You have a right to bear arms, but if you are going by the strictest interpretation, those arms should be a firearm built using 1776 technology. Fuck originality interpretation. We all know exactly what SCOTUS is going to overturn next and it is going to backslide America into a further shithole
> There is an interesting ideological reversal here with regard to the recent vaccine debate with liberals arguing the government should be able to compel vaccination, and the conservatives against.

My interpretation of that ideology is that liberals want the government to protect public health by restricting personal freedom of participation in certain aspects of the public sphere by those who choose not to be vaccinated, and conservatives want to put their own personal choices above the public health by allowing them to do without restriction all the things they did before the pandemic regardless of their vaccination status. There was never serious debate about blanket compelling of vaccination.
You're allowed to do whatever you want. For myself, I am just beyond supporting or being part of any type of group or culture or signaling such.
It would need to be a 25% raise for 4 days of wages to be paid as 5.
Regardless of what the Bible actually says there is undeniably a massive religious component to the anti-abortion movement.
In your ideal world, can people refuse to "help" or would they be forced against their will? If it's the latter then that is slavery.
Pointed out by you. Maybe you should stop writing it; surely once is enough.
Much of this labor is activism, which is why they do it.

They get to control the narrative, to suppress dissent/wrongthink, and to bury inconvenient news.
Other well-off western countries have much cheaper and convenient access to hormonal birth control. In the country I live in, Germany, a month’s supply of pills is about 10 EUR retail, no insurance. On the public insurance the vast majority of women have, they’re 5 EUR/quarter. For women and girls under 20, they’re free.

Should you end up pregnant, it’s illegal to fire you for any reason, and you must either be accommodated or put on paid leave. During that first year of Covid, any nurse or doctor or other employee that had to work with the public was put on paid leave if pregnant if something non-public-facing couldn’t be found for them.

We also get 2/3 of our previous net salary for up to a year after the birth to stay home with our babies, and that was as a mother with a well-employed husband. There is further assistance for women in harder circumstances.

Granted, abortion is (was?) more strictly controlled here. You have to go for “conflict counseling,” but it’s available from both of the major churches (the Lutheran church’s organization aims to help you if you want to go through with the pregnancy, but will give you information on the costs and logistics of termination), other religious associations, as well as secular organizations with a pro-choice point of view (e.g.: ProFamilia). After the 12th week, however, you can only get an abortion if your life or health is in danger, or the fetus has a serious abnormality. Yes, Down Syndrome is an accepted ground for termination, but social support services for mentally-handicapped children and adults are far more comprehensive and reliable here than in the US.

Result? One of the lowest abortion rates in the world among countries where women (mostly) have bodily autonomy.
There’s an important discussion to be had around this: revolutions take inspiration, which only comes after people see that things can be better.

You can argue that crypto won’t form a revolution because we still support and value trusted third parties, but using decentralized assets on a blockchain may be what inspires people to change those institutions and relationships.

Sadly, many of the “get rich quick” scams we see getting deployed on blockchains won’t help build the public’s confidence in changing our current system, but there’s still time.
As for feedback. we gave up after 10 years. That’s literally how long we’d been asking for notifications.
I am confused here. Are you saying these are all myths?

https://www.newsweek.com/ruth-bader-ginsburg-roe-wade-aborti...

https://www.law.uchicago.edu/news/justice-ruth-bader-ginsbur...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2022/05/06/ruth-bader...

Seems to me RGB did feel that ruling was weak and should have decided based on equal protections not privacy.
A small style nit: I am surprised that a journal like the CACM (not a general audience publication) would think that common acronyms like JTAG, UART, and FIFO need be spelled out at first use.

I’m not the journal’s editor, so perhaps it is appropriate to assume the audience will be unfamiliar with the terms. But in that case merely expanding the acronym is mostly useless (e.g. a JTAG port is an extremely low level debugging interface and knowing the name of the standards body doesn’t help explain that).
> I mean isn't that the will of the people in that state?

That really depends on when those laws were passed, and whether attitudes have changed since then, doesn't it?

Most of these laws weren't passed last year, and the issue has been legislatively moot for 50 years, so you're going to have a very hard time convincing me that those laws represent the current will of the people in every state.

> you are wanting to subvert their democratic process, no?

Yes. I believe there are and should be restrictions on what the majority of a state can pass.

I do want to subvert the democratic process in some specific instances. For example, if the majority of a state I didn't live in wanted to legalize slavery, I would say that they do not get that choice and that they may not.

It's not like this is groundbreaking. There are all kinds of federal laws that preempt state laws on various topics.

Pretty sure CA just had the will of its voters thrown out just yesterday relating to their gun laws, so maybe it's not so sacrosanct.
If he was really worried about that, he should've just shut it down himself to save us all some trouble.
>> As far as I understand, anti-abortion laws started getting traction in the 1800s. Before that, these were scattered and mostly religious inspired.

The court found otherwise, you can read the majority's evidence in their opinion at https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf starting on page 17:

"The “eminent common-law authorities (Blackstone, Coke, Hale, and the like),” Kahler v. Kansas, 589 U. S. ___, ___ (2020) (slip op., at 7), all describe abortion after quickening as criminal. Henry de Bracton’s 13th-century treatise explained that if a person has “struck a pregnant woman, or has given her poison, whereby he has caused abortion, if the foetus be already formed and animated, and particularly if it be animated, he commits homicide.” 2 DeLegibus et Consuetudinibus Angliae 279 (T. Twiss ed. 1879); see also 1 Fleta, c. 23, reprinted in 72 Selden Soc. 60–61 (H. Richardson & G. Sayles eds. 1955) (13th-century
treatise)."

They go on for a few pages going over common law before discussing the historical record in the US.
So wouldn’t a granular authority be better than a nation wide ruling?

It would serve people better.
The Supreme Court neither banned abortion nor prohibited the legislature from protecting the right to abortion. It merely decided that it is not currently protected by constitution, which to me seems completely correct.

If most people agree that it should be a constitutional right, no one stops the legislature from adding the required amendment. And if most people can't agree on that, well, adding that wouldn't be democratic.
Pinterest Must Face Suit by Woman Who Says She Helped Create It
> Randomly generate [1000,10000000] random numbers in the range [-2^63,2^63-1], average speed is 3 times faster than Quicksort, fastest is 20 times.

What about slowest?
Well, it's doubtful that Thomas wouldn't find a way to sustain the ruling in Loving w/o using substantive due process. I mean, for obvious reasons.
I'm am ambivert.

In most situations I am deeply introverted, I think it is a blast to spend the whole weekend reading, coding, hiking, playing single player video games, etc.

On the other hand if I am properly prepared and motivated I can outperform most extroverts at the things they do for a very short time.

More and more I appreciate the benefits of being plugged into existing social connections. Last weekend, I drove about five hours to attend a graduation party and I had a great time talking to new people because I was there with numerous extended family and found I didn't have to carry conversations by myself, in fact my relatives would do a great job of introducing new people to the other relatives that were present which would always interest people and make it easy for me.
You’re still not getting it. Crypto isn’t meant to be converted to fiat, it’s meant to replace fiat.
Not disagreeing, but this comes from further back than a decade. It goes all the way at the very least to Gingrich, when Republicans locked on the religious vote by attacking the "immoral conduct" of Bill Clinton. It worked so well that they've made it a structural element of their strategies. You can see the traces of this even in the political allegory of clintonism that is The West Wing - this episode was filmed in year 2000: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3VHK1NXIBw
Show HN: Generative Art Platform: Go Explore
RunPod.io has partnered with /u/entmike to create a free and open platform for exploring generative art: https://discord.gg/ZDdjFzwWQq

We started a website to enable easier viewing of galleries (pardon the dust, it's very WIP): https://www.feverdreams.app/

The community made us an awesome study tool: https://observablehq.com/@jgrunik/fever-dreams

Fever Dreams is very much in active development, so please excuse us when the queue gets jammed or if things don't work. Issues usually get fixed very fast :)

Compute is sponsored by RunPod.io and you can easily create private art there as well: https://runpod.io/blog/disco-diffusion-on-runpod?ref=hnews
Yeah, I deal with it like an interesting research project, not a tool. For that, it’s MozJPEG.
I like how your comment points out cannabis.

> The US government exercises this power all the time. It's why most cannabis dispensaries and growers are forced to deal with cash because they're excluded from the banking system.

The US tried to ban the use of cannabis. The result was not that cannabis stopped being used or that it significantly reduced the levels of cannabis use - instead, recreational cannabis users and those with legitimate reasons for using it were forced into more dangerous black market activity, and often criminalized and put behind bars. Millions of dollars of state funding was spent exercising this drug war, which most people now see as a colossal failure, and finally some states are decriminalizing and legalizing cannabis use so long as it falls within government regulations.

No single country can do much to take the network offline by banning mining. If all countries in unison decided to criminalize mining and enact a PoW-war, and were successful the blanket removal of PoW mining, then maybe the network would suffer to remain online, and users would be forced to migrate to more resilient consensus mechanisms like Proof of Stake.
I wonder if this connects to the Gunbarrel Highway (also built by Len Beadell)...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunbarrel_Highway
I don't think it's right to place blame totally on evangelicals and other Christians. The Republican platform is reactionary top to bottom. This is further reflected in Republican politician's votes.

What I'm saying is, this happens even without fervent support from the religious right.

This also likely isn't the final chapter, as the opinion also gives thoughts to overturning rulings related to contraception and same sex marriage.
Not a fan of the Boltzmann brain idea?
It's not even the state - if Visa and banks, et al decide they will not work with you, then you're severely restricted in the ways you can receive payments: cash and crypto are really the main options at that point.
Thanks! I knew someone would chime in, was trying to find it on Wikipedia
> they prefer family, church, charity, and community.

So where is the child who is raped and impregnated by her uncle, priest, or coach supposed to turn?
- I'll call this plant "Huge crooked penis".

- Sir, the Biological Society won't accept that name.
The linked article's title is actually "Glasgow council four-day week on full pay moves closer after study agreed" which is what this should be changed to.
So I'm going to stop you right there, because before you go down that route, you need to realize that what makes computer program testing both feasible and worthwhile is the execution speed of digital logic.

Testing of human beings is to computers as testing on responses by plants is to humans. I.e., you can change something about a plants environment, and it will take hours to days for the effects to become apparent; in short two completely different timescales. In fact, you could very easily consume most of your day examining yourself thoroughly.

Also, I assure you, you will never implement a human unit test without running into very dicey ethical and logistics problems. You're pretty much at integration level by default. Which means your controls are non-trivial, and likely highly disruptive to establish.

That being said:

For workouts:
-Reps @ resistance in unit time
-Activity intensity for unit time
For mentation:
-Repetitive/similar task done in unit time
-Error detection over unit time.
-Context switches before self awareness of error state breaks down.
-Reflex time

Basically, your getting into the realm of medical and psychological assessment. It is a realm I generally refuse to further the State of the Art in, as most human quantification efforts are inevitably doomed to get into what I deem to be morally fraught territory, as it is just far too tempting for those in positions of authority/power or aspiring to such to abuse any such system as soon as it is characterized.

Is there positive utility in niche situations? Yes. Is that enough to get such measures off my "Things I Won't Work With" list? No.
I like them and wear them but get the logos removed by eg a seamstress, it's very cheap like 3 dollars. Crocodiles especially, I removed one myself but it took like 3 hours. They're on super tight.
As a security professional, I deeply respect Bruce. He fundamentally understands the nature of cryptography, infosec and society. I’ve read his work and followed him for years. Got the Bruce T-shirt.

For some reason he totally missed the whole cryptocurrency thing, which a lot of cryptographers did in the early days. The problem is that he still is regurgitating the same FUD from 8+ years now.

These days I look to up to folks like Dan Boneh. That guy is amazing.
BTC and Monero aren’t really instant or free because the recipient has to convert them to real money (and pay fees) before they can use them for most things
With modern medical knowledge, abortion is safe. Does that make an unwanted pregnancy forced labor?

https://www.thenation.com/article/society/abortion-ethics-ge...
Some voters may, but the main goal is to manage society.

It's a perfect replacement subject for income inequality, debate about guns, foreign policy like isolationist movement.

Because of the electoral system, Republicans in Texas had a big issue with immigrations from "blue states" - they could loose it forever. This is an existential threat for them - first fight was Heartbeat bill. Now they have a perfect tool to slow down the process or even reverse it.
Uniqlo's XXL is not true XXL so I can't wear any of their clothing :(
How about a 1k ebike for everything you can use it for and the car for everything else?
OK, if you really think Safari is worse than dealing with IE hacks you probably were not writing anything for the web back then. This was already a tenuous argument, but come on.

OS lock-in and slow adoption of new web features is perhaps lame but Safari doesn't have anything even approaching it's own box model, or `-ms-filter` equivalent, or quirks mode... the list approaches infinity.

Also, "install something else?" Do you know what the browser landscape looked like back then? IE had >80% dominance for years, and your other option was Netscape, which lacked huge swaths of custom features in IE.
`() =>` is just the lambda syntax. JavaScript has, by far, one of the most understandable lambda syntaxes.

For instance, look how blocks are declared in Objective-C: http://fuckingblocksyntax.com/
Being pretend nerdy is cool among Gen Z now.
It may not be well-known in the hearing community, but for some people sign language (generally ASL in the USA) is their first language, and English is their second.

I obviously don't know what the case is here, but switching to text meetings or live captioning isn't necessarily a full solution for all deaf people.
And these justifications from previous decisions (Obergefell, Loving etc… ) can be overturned with the current SCOTUS’s interpretation. In-fact, in the leaked draft, these were also on the docket to be targeted by the court. In todays assent, only Obergefell is being targeted. I wonder why that is? (Cough, Clarence Thomas)