skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I refuse to wear or display any corporate logo, even if I generally like the company or its products. I buy unbranded clothing. When I can't get something unbranded (like a decent parka), I remove or obliterate the logo. I covered the apple on my phone and computer with electrical tape, even though I've been a Mac user for nearly 30 years.

I am not a billboard. I reject status and status seeking behavior. I refuse to help corporations with their marketing and promotion. I wouldn't even do it if they paid me because I am against advertising. It's all manipulative and depraved and it promotes status and class.
And why would this sense of experience be confined to the physical world?
The international group of donors does not need to give up any personal data to read a tweet and decide to deposit some of their tokens into a crowdfund contract.
Thanks! Will definitely check that out. I know I have stumbled in there before, but not having used the service I have not really looked around too much.
New algorithms track ships in harbors
OCaml does not require more annotations than Haskell for polymorphic functions?
Both language only require annotations in the case where inference would be undecidable (polymorphic recursions, higher-rank polymorphism, and GADTs).

I know few cases where OCaml require less annotations than Haskell, I would expect the reverse to be true.

And maps and sets are not the main use case for polymorphism in OCaml. Even taking in account that it sounds like you are talking about functors, maps and sets are still not the only instance of functors in OCaml.
Back-to-office mandates won't work, says Salesforce's Benioff
DC v. Heller was wrong. Go read the context around all of the places where a militia is mentioned in the constitution. It’s a pretty clear difference from the world that DC v. Heller created.
You don't have to fear getting mugged in the streets, but you can still get ripped off.

One example are the notoriously expensive bars in Roppongi, at night there will be touts in the streets trying to convince tourists to join them for a night of drinking. They'll then go to the bar that hired those touts where, after a night of drinking, the tourists will be presented with a bill that's the equivalent of getting robbed.
Then maybe you shouldn't work with others.
They started in the 1980s, but it since most playgrounds are expected to last for many years they were a small minority of playgrounds until the time frame you name.

As a kid my parents knew a school principal - he retired around 1990, before he retired he was under pressure to upgrade the playground and he always refused because he went to other schools with upgraded playgrounds and watch kids not use all the expensive new stuff so he refused to waste money installing it. When he retired the school did a big fund raiser for modern equipment - and sure enough after installed kids didn't use it.
Of course there has to be a mutual expectation in successful dialogue. I was just replying to someone who seemed not to realize both sides have the same concept of civil/social justice. Those realizations can be helpful for those trying to communicate with political opponents. It sounds like you have no interest, and that’s fine.
Yes, many of them are silkscreened in full color
The supreme court just decided that precedent is meaningless though.
I think they are just very stupid, and lying to themselves. But this is such a deep stupidity, you can't just say their beliefs aren't real.

If this belief of theirs isn't real, none of them are. Which I think is actually true. They believe in nothing.
> You're enmeshed in the same basic experience you had in your domestic country, except you had to sit in a plane or on a train for hours to get there.

http://www.threepanelsoul.com/comic/getting-away
Not much context here, but built https://daborsneeze.com/ after a random interaction gave me the idea at a conference. Adding images slowly over time but there's really no ultimate goal there.
What happened to giant hovercraft? [video]
Earlier this month we integrated a C++ library written by my team with a server written by another team.

We saw the data corruption, and we knew it was a reference issue, but it took quite a bit of effort to track down. The cause was confusion around string_view and string&, with different behavior when you pass each to a new thread.

Rust would have caught this much earlier and saved 3 days work.
As I said I wasn’t advocating the use of twitter, merely using it as a unit of measure.
Show HN: An alternative to Splitwise, more minimalist, no ads, no account
Religious tolerance is ok up to the point where they start pushing their beliefs on everyone else.
>can say things as they are, one of the few things I liked about China as well,

What a hearty laugh this gave me early in the morning, thank you.
I thought their answer was very clear: facilitates illegal transactions

this is a good thing because tyrannical governments make all kinds of things illegal, and blockchain removes some of this absolute power to prevent various transactions
Interestingly enough - Evangelicals where typically left of center prior to Roe v. Wade (even in states where abortion was legal). My hope is that things return to a more historical norm now that Roe V Wade can actually be "a fair fight" (to use Scalia's language)
I don't remember having to complain because of its slowness.

Some operations can take times, such as computing a burndown report, but I don't have comparison with another tool to say if it's slow or not.
Hey everyone,

I'm creating this new social media platform for everyone. It's geared toward people that feel alienated online and want a way to reconnect with friends. I'd love some thoughts and opinions from the HN Community...just mainly looking for feedback. You can read more about it and my thought process behind it here:

https://www.crooer.com/about-4

and if you feel like it and like the concept, sign up on the site!

Thanks - Michael
Article the twelfth (AKA the 10th amendment) of the Bill of Rights from the US Constitution: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

So the current argument might be that since the constitution does not give the federal government the power to regular abortions (or to prevent states from regulating them), then that power to regulate them or not is reserved for the states to do as they please.

The prior argument (from Roe vs Wade) is that the US Constitution provides a right to privacy and that prohibiting or otherwise restricting abortions violates that right to privacy.

While there's no explicit right to privacy in the constitution, it could be implied by the 14th amendment: "... nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law ..."

From the original Roe vs Wade opinion:
"A person may choose to have an abortion until a fetus becomes viable, based on the right to privacy contained in the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Viability means the ability to live outside the womb, which usually happens between 24 and 28 weeks after conception."
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/410/113/
Just like how the people who are upset about this ruling can be upset that when their party controlled all 3 branches numerous times, they never put abortion into the constitution to firmly protect it, or the other "rights" you mentioned. Instead they use it as an emotional club every election to get votes, but did nothing to protect it when they had the power to do so.
> The international group of donors does not need to give up any personal data to read a tweet

https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs/twitter-for-websites/p...

> What information does Twitter collect through Twitter for Websites and how is that information used?
When you view Twitter content or Twitter products integrated into other websites using Twitter for Websites, Twitter may receive information including the web page you visited, your IP address, browser type, operating system, and cookie information. This information helps us to improve our products and services, including personalized suggestions and personalized ads.
Hi there!

I made Spliit because I was sick of Splitwise, of all the ads on the app and all the features I never use that just add noise to my user experience.

Spliit is a web app that offers you to create groups, share them with other participants, add expenses, and see how to reimburse each other in an optimal way.

You don’t need an account to use it, and it is free to use. I just added a tiny premium feature; to be honest it is more a way to support the app and its hosting cost :)

I hope you like it!
> Now that they have gotten what they wanted, are they still going to vote for Republicans with the same transactional decision process?

Yes; that's why Thomas's concurring decision openly threatens the gay marriage, contraception, etc. decisions. (He left Loving v. Virginia off the list, though. For some reason.) There's plenty more red meat to throw to the Republican base as far as SCOTUS is concerned.
> The government also forces me...

You have the alternative of dropping from the world and stop using all things paid with your taxes.

> The left have grown militant, and increasingly want to force their world view on everyone else.

I'm curious to know exactly _what_ harms you about gay marriage or abortions, other than your feelings.

On one side, we have people gaining rights, whereas on the other, there are people who don't agree with it. And I'm having a hard time understanding why your feelings are supposed to have more weight in a society, than their rights.

You frame this in a way so it is about tax money, but frankly, there is no possible tax system where people only pay for what they want.
Blockchain is a relatively poor facilitator of illegal transactions, in that the chain of past transactions needs to be kept and known to many parties in the distributed algorithm. That makes it not-difficult to track down who it was that made a transaction.
After spending too much time with External Audit on meetings and reports, I'd actually prefer being mugged.
So this raises some interesting questions.

What if an American person wishing to have an abortion just travels to another country where it's legal to get it done? Can they be arrested upon return?

If so, does that mean that all Europeans that had an abortion could be liable to prosecution in the US if they choose to visit?

Not that I expect a huge impact to tourism etc. I've seen gay football fans willing to go to Qatar to watch their matches. Visiting a country that thinks they should die didn't seem to bother them :/
Also, you are deliberately cutting off the end of the sentence in your quote.
Yeah, and home cooks do billions of dollars worth of free cooking per year for their friends and family. The fact that something can be valued in dollars doesn't actually mean that it's wrong that it's being done for no monetary compensation. You can put a dollar value on anything, including every constructive hobby, sport, and pastime that people do.
"The future is now, old man".
> There's no reason some humans couldn't be non-sentient, no matter how sentient they appear.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_zombie
They are also not experts in their field. Any time I see a topic in my field on Reddit the comments that imply expert knowledge are virtually guaranteed to be factually incorrect. I've never seen any evidence that a Reddit moderator possesses any special knowledge of any topic. Has your experience been different? Maybe I've just never visited the right subreddits.
I'm not sure what you're asking here. I have no clue where this sense of experience would be located, but my point was more targeted at clearing up that memory is not a pre-requisite for sentience, as the parent post seemed to be implying.
All government has become profoundly bad - but medicare expansion and NCLB, and AIDS in Africa bills probably are not quite as bad as most.
Wait, you didn't get the 120MB of CSS and JS to show that? Hmm.
1956 Suez Crisis
Well, first of all, it is a foundational principle of democracy that you can vote how you like for whatever reason you like. You can vote for a rule that every governing board have at least one woman because you hate men!

But as a matter of fact, Christians who are Christians in more than name only do everything of import because of Jesus -- or because of biblical teaching more generally. I believe that I should tell the truth because of Jesus. I believe that divorce is wrong because of Jesus. I believe that those who take a life should forfeit their own because of Jesus (Gen 9.6).
The core of it, as with most terrible, regressive things in American culture and politics, is Conservative Christianity. It's also why Republicans oppose contraception and why many Christians believe masturbation is a sin.
> Acceptance of gay marriage is being forced on everyone

Let's follow this line of reasoning to it's logical conclusion.

What if someone decides that acceptance of your religion, race and ethnicity is also being forcen on everyone? What if they get some funny ideas about Lebensraum?
If you insist.

>99% of would be abortions are preventable by just practicing safe sex.

Non-substantial and uncited statistic. 99% of pregnancy is prevented by safe sex.

>Yes I know there's the 1%, but let's talk about the overwhelming majority here.

Unsubstantiated ratio. Assumption that safe-sex is universally possible. It’s a privilege that not all get to enjoy, and abortion is the edge-case of human behavior that addresses those situations.

>If you can't afford children, be a responsible adult and don't have them.

Assumption of full reproductive autonomy.

>Again, 9 months of gestation is absolutely not more an invasion of autonomy than the following 18 years of care.

Moral hazard.

>In most abortions the aborted fetus would have developed into a healthy, functioning human being had you not prevented it. That's murder. You're taking away a humans opportunity for life.

In law we call this “but-for” analysis. Essentially, “but for” someone aborting a fetus, the fetus “would have developed into a healthy, functioning human being.”

Everything else up to this point was fine but the last point is where the “bless your heart” materialized in my soul. Would that we could guarantee the health and functioning of humans, simply by not aborting them.

They say “If you want to make God laugh, tell him your plans,” but in your case it’s “If you want to make God laugh, tell him his plans.”
> But that wincing comes from an assumption: that a transaction is morally just if and only if it is legal.

I don't think this is true. The wincing comes from a different assumption; that the state has the right to restrict some transactions.

I think almost everyone agrees that there are laws that are either unfair or should be repealed; however, most people don't think that means that the state should be blocked from enforcing laws.

While I agree that there needs to be some ability to act outside of the law to allow public opinions on unjust or inappropriate laws to shift, but I don't think being concerned that laws are easy to bypass means that we believe all the laws are just.
Obligatory Tim Kreider comic on this point: https://i.redd.it/u9c8patjifb51.jpg
DC vs Heller was a bad decision full of ideological motivated reasoning by a politicized court.
This an arbitary threshold that makes it trivially impossible for any species that can't master human languages (which is any known species except humans) to have rights.

Consider what a bee on BN (Bhacker News) might say in an alternative reality

>> We do give humans protections, and those protections are roughly proportionate to (our believes regarding) their cognitive abilities. If some human started waggle dancing about human rights, those would exist pretty much immediately.

It is not fair for bees to judge you on how much you can waggle dance (their communication style) before giving you rights, the physiological requirement is irrelevant to your moral worth and impossible to achieve.

Intelligence is similarly irrelevant to moral worth. It's just the ability to solve problems, spicier definitions include things like recursive modelling (an entity capable of self-reflection) and self-preservation. None of this has the slightest thing to do with morality or ethics, a trivial counter example that satisfy all would be nation-states, they solve problems, they are capable of self-modelling, they seeks self-preservation (to astonishing lengths).
Do not murder.

The claim that abortion is forbidden "in all major religions" is false.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judaism_and_abortion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_abortion
Ask HN: How do you view social interaction with other people?
There is a legal principle that once the court bedsides something and it becomes established law, you don't overturn the previous decision lightly.

Roe & Wade is based on the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution. Roe vs Wade did not happen in vacuum, it's part of a larger understanding of the Constitution that recognizes a right to privacy and recognizes that there are unwritten rights.

This decision overturns this whole 50-year old framework. Decisions based on 14th Amendment’s Due Process clause are now open for banning contraception, banning interracial relationships, family relationships, right to intimacy (sodomy laws), the right to personal control of medical treatment. It will even have data collection limit consequences.

How Dismantling Roe Puts Interracial Marriage at Risk
https://www.aclu.org/podcast/how-dismantling-roe-puts-interr...
Also anecdata: I'm hungry after I exercise, but this is almost entire resolved by drinking something cold with a electrolytes. A big chug of coconut water for example
The presence of low-range EVs—many of which need battery or tire replacements—doesn't really change the point. A similarly priced Honda Fit from the same model year is a better value due to its low maintenance costs, fuel economy, and infinite range.
Wow.

In case other readers are also not as familiar with those rulings:

Griswold: protects the liberty of married couples to buy and use contraceptives

Lawrence: protects the right to consensual, adult homosexual intercourse

Obergefell: legalizes gay marriage
> the current state of the market contributes very little to the overall narrative.

You're the one complaining about the last few months of increased negative articles. If you cannot see the connection between the frequency of negative articles and the price of Bitcoin, then I'm sorry but I don't know how to communicate in braille.
The question is way too broad. Narrow it down to

location (city),
role,
years of experience (junior?, senior?, lead?),
industry (IT, Finance, Industry),
employer (big, small, startup)
i deserved it, i guess, lol
We play https://skribbl.io/ religiously
> Is it minority views?

Yes, unquestionably, the vast majority of Americans support the right to abortion. That said you can do a lot with gerrymandering, suppressing voters, and our archaic electoral college that gives people more/less voting power based on the state they live in.
What does the Constitution say about religious tolerance? The founders seemed to have a stronger opinion on keeping religion out of politics.
Fantastic shoes, you won’t regret it. Your Significant Other, on the other hand…
We'll need to escalate to the PO of Poe's Law to get a more precise spec.
Well, that explains why the exploratory job application I sent their way a couple of months ago disappeared into the void. I wouldn't be surprised if they've been in a hiring freeze in preparation for this move.
> I could be convinced against abortion _if_ there was a guarantee that every child would have the full resources of the government to help them achieve a successful life. We all know that isn't going to happen.

Kids brought up with bad parents will be somewhat similarly disadvantaged. Why should potentially bad parents (eg. heavy drug addicts) not be banned from having kids? Both of them would be "forcing children onto parents who are in bad positions to raise them".
We’re Not Going Back to the Time Before Roe. We’re Going Somewhere Worse
Apple is the old Microsoft as far as open-closed-source is concerned, I just ditched Macbook pro for a windows laptop that runs WSL2 at work, my home is pure Linux. I took similar actions against Microsoft/Windows a decade ago, now I think Apple is a much worse Microsoft, browser is just one of its typical behaviors.
As a Christian what strikes me is that very few who are free wish for slavery, and very few who are alive wish they had been aborted. Wealth makes this a virtually ironclad rule, and they'll have no excuse for killing those before they could find a voice or ability to defend themselves.
From Yiddish? I didn't know that. Interesting and Thank You.

A few years ago, I used the word "Schmuck", and someone asked me if I was Jewish (I'm not). I didn't realize that "Schmuck" was also a Yiddish word until then. I looked it up, and I didn't realize that some Yiddish speaking people consider it to be obscene profanity! So now I use a little more sparingly.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schmuck_(pejorative)
Great. Another benefit for the salaried over the hourly. I couldn't find a solid answer, but I very much doubt that this pronouncement comes with a 20% raise for everyone paid by the hour.
> There are however valid questions, like if Rust slows down your development say, 5%, would you get more net safety from spending 5% more time testing/fuzzing c++ code instead? etc.

I think a similarly valid question is how often you resorted to dynamic allocations just to get the borrow checker off your back. If your Rust version uses 5% more dynamic memory (with the corresponding performance and memory footprint penalty), is it perhaps worth staying with C/C++ and spending more development time on testing/fuzzing?
>> You just called something like 100M or more Americans not good people

Fair enough. So long as they believe they deserve more rights than another group of people, they're not good people. Hopefully they'll change their opinion. I've known plenty of people to change their opinion on this issue over the years and hopefully it'll continue on that trajectory. My point was more than on those issues it's simply one group that thinks another group does not deserve to be treated equally. With abortion it's more two sets of competing 'rights' - the woman and the foetus.
It's probably not a bad idea to have a gigantic SCOTUS.
If it makes you feel better you're welcome to believe that, but I'm sorry to inform you that this is not the case. However, my good health after many years on the carnivore diet is enough for me, I don't have the need to convince anyone.
> I have an IP address, therefore I am.

But he doesn’t. He only has a NAT:ed address.
Why? Guns kill (order of magnitude) about 4,000 children each year[1] in the USA. There are (order of magnitude) about 800,000 abortions each year[2] in the USA. If you are one of the people who believes that unborn child lives are worth the same as adult lives, then you should be 200 times more concerned about abortion than gun violence.

1: https://wisqars.cdc.gov/fatal-reports

2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_statistics_in_the_Uni...

Here's how to set up WISQARS for that report:

2020, United States
Firearm Deaths and Rates per 100,000
All Races, Both Sexes, Ages 0 to 18
ICD-10 Codes: W32-W34,X72-X74,X93-X95,Y22-Y24, Y35.0,\*U01.4
Could you expound on the definition of profoundly deaf, please? I think the phrase is used differently here (US American midwest/south).