skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> The Congress is already talking about passing nationwide legislation to protect the right to abortion. Such legislation would still be constitutional even after this decision.

Please cite the Constitutional power authorizing this, restricting it to powers that will hold up under the present Court against a state asserting the absence of Constitutional federal authority and infringement of powers reserved under the 10th Amendment.

It can't be the power to enforce the 14th Amendment, because abortion as a right within that has been ruled out.

A hyperexpansive view of the Commerce Clause?

No, codification is a fools errand.
Good to see that Zig is getting some love on such a neat phone.

wonder how it would do on like Android.
Yeah, even as a very pro-union guy (film background) I couldn’t really take issue with that stance.
Three Independent Dimensions of Work on Engineered Artifacts
https://www.ycombinator.com/faq
I could use your argument in the other direction. What useful purpose it served to overturn it after 50 years ago, other than to kick political compromise to the curb and increase polarization and harm.
The more detailed you have to get explaining things, the less I would want to use it. If I can say something like "get the employee's pay-related data" and not have to delineate exactly what fields to get and what to call them, that would be useful. If I could say "make sure they are not also a student" (I work for a university) and have it figure that out, that would also be useful. If I have to tell it what joins to make I'd rather just type it in in sql or whatever it's underlying language is. Typing is much more casual of an activity for me than speaking is, and I can type for hours at a time and I can't talk for that long without my throat running dry. If I can say in a few words what I want and save a lot of typing, then that's great. If I end up saying as much a I would type anyway, then I'd rather just type it.

I think this is definitely something that should be looked at, but it's not a product I'm really interested in unless it wows me with it's intelligence. It has to start somewhere, though. I'm probably an outlier in the sense that I think a lot of people would rather talk to their computer than type on a keyboard. I'm just not one of them. I also don't want to work in cubicle hell with everyone speaking to their computer 24/7.
> and are the last army standing preventing the Web turning into ChromeOS

Except safari doesn't exist outside of Apple's luxury walled garden.

> they are still winning.

The strategic purpose of Safari is to extract dollars from Google and push users to the app store. Indeed a second rate, mediocre Safari is in Apple's best interest. On the other hand Google has every reason to develop the best browser possible and the incredible scale of chromium development demonstrates that.
This seems more like difficulty getting in touch with a human at YouTube in the first place. Once they got that, the practical issues were resolved with YouTube undoing the takedowns, but the PII of the involved accounts needed to go through the legal process.
Central Bank Digital Currencies are not interesting or useful
I mean, they could do that because, with few hard legal obligations to you, their own internal assessment that implementing TOTP has a good chance of cutting support load and probably won't cause too many problems is Good Enough to move forward with it.

Banks have to price in the risk that, if something does go wrong, they could have regulators on their back. And uh, have poor incentive structure wrt being perfectly allowed to do everything by the book and slipping responsibility if the book is just wrong.
Your GP "yelled" at you and "made up" random diagnoses to save a few £ per month, deliberately putting your partner's health at risk?

Any GP doing what you say would lose their job and not be allowed to practice again.

My understanding is that you (and maybe your partner) had specific expectations about who you would see and what they would do for you. Your expectations were not met, and you've interpreted this very negatively through some basic misunderstandings of how the NHS works.

> My girlfriend said she was fine paying for a more expensive pill (in Italy you have to pay for it). Then the doctor went on explaining that the NHS would have to pay for it

Despite the fact that you clearly dislike this, it is indeed true. You can't ask an NHS GP to prescribe a specific medication and offer to pay for it yourself. The NHS buys meds and issues them through prescriptions. That's pretty much it.

Just to be clear: I fully accept that not all experiences with GPs are perfect (and neither are all experiences with consultants).

If you want to tell a doctor what you want and have them give it to you, stick to private care. Your opinion of NHS GPs is clearly very low, and unfortunately seems misinformed.
Hah, we just had a comment in the other thread where someone suggested this would happen and someone else was skeptical.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31869856

But what's Goldman's play here? To pump crypto after buying?
His point is having a union established often means the problems were really bad.
DJNZ only does the decrement and branch if zero part. That's implicit in DBcc, which also initially checks the condition and is equivalent to NOP when true.
Sex of what, the unattended item that is about to get stolen? Or thieves can typically tell the item owner's sex by just looking at the item they were thinking about stealing?
>In the months and years to co come, ultra-conservatives aim to eliminate birth control and install an overbearing theocratic government. They are not shy about saying so[...]

Since you were kind enough to provide references to your other statements of fact, would you mind doing the same for this one? Because I've been seeing that exact sentiment repeated ad nauseum for a long while now and yet every attempt I've made to figure out where it came from, so far, has been from the claimant imputing intent upon a nebulous Other, with all such claims assuming the most malicious version of a strawman possible... and we all know that's against the rules, here. The sole argument I've seen sourced, in this specific case, hinges upon a very uneducated misinterpretation of a (relatively unimportant) concurrent opinion by Justice Thomas in which the hyperbolic clearly don't understand the concepts of "substantive due process" and are mixing it up with something else entirely.
Multiple sources in USA claimed masks were not needed for people without the disease. Heavily implying it was useless.

I of course knew that was BS from the get-go. But nonetheless they did say it.

https://time.com/5794729/coronavirus-face-masks/
I’m a college student @ an Ivy League school, and I keep hearing about how easy it is to take advantage of the name for VC money.

I really don’t get how.

Are there any actionable steps you could point me towards, other than getting involved with the school incubator? I’d love to learn more.
> Almost all states (and other countries) where abortion is legalized still have reasonable limits on when they may be performed (e.g., not after second trimester). I think we would both agree that an abortion of an otherwise viable and healthy baby one day before expected delivery would be unethical.

Your moral compass isn't accounting for the logistics of pregnancy. At any point during a pregnancy or childbirth, complications can arise which risk the mother's life, and a medical decision is most often made to save her instead of a potentially healthy child. By both medical and legal definition, this is still an abortion. To declare that it's not ethical to abort in these situations is a declaration that it is ethical to kill the mother. So, we very much do not agree that the ethics of abortion are obvious or even quantifiable.

> Many things people do don’t infringe on my rights. Someone murdering another person doesn’t infringe MY rights, but it is still wrong. A parent beating their child doesn’t infringe my rights but is still abuse.

I think you missed the point here, or I wasn't clear enough. Given that the spectrum of ethics doesn't allow for a standard threshold of "murder" and we've already established that abortions are a medical necessity, the only case against the right to abortion boils down to being personally offended by someone else's actions. If medical care can be decided by personal offense and codified into a law that is guaranteed to be harmful, then we don't actually have the freedoms described in the Constitution.

> Yes, but we are in disagreement on which rights are applicable in this case. [...] It is not, nor should it ever be, the responsibility of the court to attempt to enshrine a right that does not exist through case law.

Freedom of speech protects the moral threshold discussed earlier. Right to privacy protects medical information. Freedom of religion is based on separation of church and state, which means religious beliefs shouldn't hold any bearing at the federal level, particularly because they may directly contradict the beliefs of another religion. These are all fundamental concepts of our democracy, and it is absolutely the court's job to uphold them when challenged.

And the case law does exist (it's the one which just got overturned), so even if you were correct about the court's responsibility, then they just did the opposite of what you're purporting that responsibility to be.
I fully support abortion rights but once the kid is alive there's no gray area. This isn't a good analogy, it just derails the discussion.

If you have a dying kid that has some kind of disease and can only survive if the parents donate blood and bone marrow at some risk of their health. Yes, I would force them to donate some blood and bone marrow.
https://fortune.com/2022/06/24/goldman-sachs-celsius-assets-...
He is advocating for human beings, by taking the defense of democratic processes and institutions, even when he disagrees with the specific decision.

Your plea is exactly reducible to: “thou shalt support the Right Thing, always”. It’s almost disturbingly naive.
This is a great bookmark manager. I have used many other solutions in the past and Raindrop provides the proper functionality you would expect from a bookmark manager after years of use I have never ran into any limitations or frustrations.
DELL and Apple are a good example of your scenario. And Microsoft and Google are examples where the founders handed the company to an MBA and the companies profits greatly increased. But I've seen these happen much less.
I agree overdrunk culture in Japan should be discussed more, but I don't see the discussion after this incident.
Taking somebody’s real story to fall back to a hypothetical moralistic scenario? I’m confused if you think this helps you actually understand someone else’s beliefs.

Ultimately questions of right and wrong are entirely values based (barring belief in an absolute power, and I’m not aware of a way to pick absolute right and wrong without starting with some sort of unprovable assumption, one could charitably call “faith”)
I'd love to see this result in a company-ending lawsuit against OneTrust.
I'm not so sure. I predict they will torch the filibuster and enact laws that entrench their power for decades. The problem is already that they are barely accountable to voters.
If you did not initially request it, don’t jump on it
aaahhh, fully outfitted riot police are at the capitol now.

I think the reaction is pretty strong!

https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/vjt38x/us_c...
I have a better solution - ask a candidate to design a system that he helped design and present it. One of the places that I interviewed had me do it. Lot better than asking someone to design twitter or Netflix on the spot.
Wouldn't you still need some sort connection to the greater network to use a credit card? Of course if you're speaking about cash then yes, but BTC also comes in the form of physical coins as well if you really wanted it.
Forget the coin. Goldman gets an entire suite of crypto products at cheap prices.
That's my point: the Mona Lisa contains the intangible property of "being the original copy" that cannot be derived from its physical traits.

If the Mona Lisa's value was determined purely from physical traits my perfect copy would be worth exactly the same.
They would still outsource the human part to people with no knowledge or power like all YouTube appeals
I would add that rights don’t flow from documents but rather need to be built up from philosophical argument. Perhaps they’re natural, discovered, or achieved but in any case I think we have to reason towards expansive and philosophically sound rights.
Here is a hypothesis that fits the data perfectly (but that could have a somewhat low prior):

- A poor studen has discovered that there is a demand in the wet market for bats.

- The student works at a lab that either has an in-house breeding area for presumably healthy bats, or that buy such bats from an external vendor.

- The student sees the opportunity for some extra income by selling some of those bats to the local wet market

- By some accident, one or more of the bats sold have been infected with some of the virusues being studied at the labratory.

Edit: A variation of the above idea would be if some bat-specialist (someone with skills for catching, keeping or transporting bats were working both the for virology institute AND for the wet market). This person could have, in some way, facilitated transfer of a virus from the institute to the wet market.

There is probably a number of such possible ways to associate the lab with the wet market, simply based on the two having a shared interest in bats.
How did you determine that you really need to raise a seed round?
I encourage you to read the concurring opinions. One justice concurs to explicitly point out that this decision does not make abortion illegal, but merely returns it to the legislative process.
One for croc https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27052840#27056746
Look at the parent article. The person quoted didn’t know what BAYC was; he went a few times a week because he liked the vibe.

Mickey had been around since 1928. I don’t think we’ll care about BAYC, specifically, but I do think it’s premature to say no NFT-based project will ever have any significant cultural impact.

Almost every human on the planet knows who Mickey Mouse is, and one corporation benefits. Aren’t you at least curious about a world where ownership of cultural icons is shared?

(I love Disney and hate NFTs so this is a weird position for me to be in, for the record)
Assume those studies are correct (I don't believe that conclusion, personally). It displays a certain lack of empathy to interact with people using assumptions about their presumed sociological groups. This may be the very definition of lacking empathy- abstracting people into groups might make sense in studies, but when those preconceptions bleed into condemning statements, it's just prejudice.

It's easy to have empathy for people like you or that you agree with, but the real test is having empathy for those who aren't / you don't.
>And that idiot revenge campaign served him with over $7M in damages. Assuming he can't pay even a fraction of that amount, what is going to happen to this genius? Will he land in jail for some time?

Thankfully, we don't have explicit (although there's plenty of incarcerated folks who wouldn't spend a day in jail if they had enough money to fight whatever bullshit charges are brought against them) debtor's prisons, so probably not.
Ah, I misread. In common parlance, my bad. I publicly take it back.
Yeah, it seems much more likely to me that Goldman is just stocking up on a bunch of crypto while it’s stupid cheap.
Since in many polls, access to abortion is supported by > 50% of Americans, your statement is rather vacuous.
Free Home Security Monitoring Using Linux (2016)
Interesting, didn’t cross my mind even though I had an Apple Performa from their dark years. I think I was young enough not to realize some of the flaws.
I was inspired by my Maslow CNC to build this polar plotter: https://derekenos.com/project-weezel
Zero-emissions hydrogen cargo airship prototype planned for 2025
Why wouldn't they be interested in $billions of assets priced at pennies on the dollar?
Because people trying to commit violent acts will go to prison etc. and, assuming they're at least vaguely rational, will realize that (and that it won't actually return their money).
Disclaimer: I am the co-founder of BoxyHQ, an open-source alternative to WorkOS.

Historically SSO (especially SAML), Directory Sync, Audit logs, enhanced roles/permissions, etc. have always been something that only Enterprises needed. We think this is now getting commoditised and should start becoming available to all customers, a big reason why our core products are on an Apache 2.0 license and startups can use it for free.

A lot of these features also tie back to security and compliance (please bear with me, I know compliance is normally just a peacock dance and has nothing to do with true security but it is still necessary to do the dance). They definitely come with a cost to implement (even if the solution is bought from vendors like us), maintain and more importantly customer support costs.

- One way to make these features table stakes would be to include it in all plans but for instance limit SSO to the top 5 Identity Providers (Okta, Azure, OneLogin, PingIdentity and Duo), normally the ones with bespoke SSO implementations are usually enterprises in any case so you can still command a higher price point for them.
- Another effective way is to say that RFPs/Security Questionnaires are only included in the Enterprise tier, the other tiers should be able to make do with a DPA and your InfoSec policy/ISO 27001/SOC2 docs. For enterprises this step is something they cannot skip, it's part of the procurement process for them.
- But the best thing to do if possible would be to add some core features/enhancements to your product that are absolutely essential for enterprises.

This is the point sso.tax is trying to make as well, they want the SSO feature to be available to everyone without having to pay a large premium on the price (which is usually high for startups/SMBs to justify paying for).

Ultimately you have to have the right price segmentation and the reality is even the best companies struggle with being able to serve all segments effectively.

Auth0 and Okta for example, after you hit some magical thresholds force you into talking to sales who then try to upsell enterprise plans and most startups can't afford those price points and anything less than those price points does not move the needle for Auth0/Okta so they end up ignoring the lower segments.
TLDR; if you can figure out how to sell a product people will buy, while not going bankrupt - you stand to profit.
Yeah and Ballmer screaming every time Google poached someone.
Started playing Shenzhen I/O in 2016 after moving to real Shenzhen, enjoyed it and wrote a guide for the game on Steam,[0] having never designed a PCB in my life. Now own a 1000m² robotics factory with a decent electronics lab and personally push out 3 boards some days. Control boards for a custom four axis system with additional peripherals and three daughterboards today, seven axes system Sunday when machining is completed (we also have a mill and lasers to cut and weld our own metal). [0] https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=78036...
I mean, look no further than the law that was being decided for this case. It banned abortions after 15 weeks, unless there’s a severe deformity or life of the mother.

This seems like the type of abortion “rights” that would get broad-based support across the aisle.

I imagine there will be a few states that outright ban abortion. But I think it will be a very small number, less than 10. And I think they will quickly change that position over the next 10 years.

I know that doesn’t help the people who live there now who want an abortion. But this ruling is not going to end abortion in America. That’s a guarantee.
Note that for short messages, hashes are unlikely to effectively conceal the content. English text has about 1 bit of information per character, and auto-sent messages are going to contain even less information. Not that google is likely to have a particular interest in that one-time code you receive via SMS, but it could almost surely brute-force the hash in a fraction of a second if it did.
It is like the search engines vs. SEO arms race. The hope could be that such proliferation can be managed by disincentivizing such abuses. The reality might be vastly different with codes that have more regularity and better chance for AI's emulating humans than the natural language texts.
if you all like TIS-1000, play Exa Punks.
Interesting move in light of current "crypto is dead" sentiment in many corners - hn included
Opposition in the Republican party was near 100%. Near 0% in the democrats. That's Republican opposition however you spin it.
Every Sufficiently Advanced Configuration Language Is Wrong
I don't get it either.

I remember hearing the same thing about the show Silicon Valley. People in the workplace would say things like "OMG I can't even watch that, it's so like our daily lives!" -- is it? Yes we're coders, but is it?

Having said that to each their own :)
The WHO called for further investigation into the lab leak theory which means they have not dismissed it and believe it deserves a proper investigation.
Regardless the function does not return a list.
Solid analysis.
It might be, I have read a dozen CFS theories from adrenal fatigue to lime disease to mitochondrial function to microbiome. I might just have too much candida?

I am basically a N=1 experiment to see what works for me in terms of management. I see a psychologist and have started meditation too to have another iron
in the fire.

Yeah I’ve done lots of blood tests. Those make me look like a 20yo athlete :-). I am not.

I love it when someone say you should see a doctor! If only … I could see just one. I probably have seen 10. I love it when one doctor shakes their head about what the other one said.

But r/cfs is actually more
useful for knowledge (doctors
are good for getting tests done, I had blood tests, brain scan, sleep study, lime tests) and I guess as a sanity check.
Miscarriage is literally called spontaneous abortion which is why I linked it to be clear. The woman’s body is playing an active role in rejecting the fetus as it deems it non viable, happens very frequently usually due to chromosomal defects.

What say you on ectopic pregnancies where it will never be viable and poses a threat to the mother?

Of course leaving a baby in a car is potentially manslaughter nobody is arguing that because there is general agreement that child is a person. The question is why you believe a fertilized egg is a person? Why is a separate sperm and egg combination not also considered a person? Why is conception the bright line? Why would you leave something as serious as homicide up to the state to decide?
Damn I really lol'd at the "not nerds" part haha.
It would be nice in the future to possibly (not saying you would do this, truly excellent work btw) have forks of the DAW (with slight modifications) so that we would have alternatives for other rPi like boards. Not saying that there's anything wrong with the rPi, I have 7 of them myself, all from the very first UK release of the first board up to the most current. I just know that for many it's not the easiest board right now to find for a decent price, and it will increase in rarity due to supply still not meeting demand over a year after we started experiencing issues getting a board.
Microsoft is now double dipping (they charge for the product and also monetize telemetry). They own linked in, github, office, teams and windows, and are combining those surveillance streams.

They continue to support the CLOUD act as a "first step":

https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2018/04/03/the-clo...