skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Nope, it works with other clients, WebSockets work with other software and Mattermost's worked before one of the recent updates.

Not to mention, when it loses the connection it doesn't re-establish it the same moment automatically.
>. The morality on the pro-life side is pretty cut and dry; any attempt to kill an innocent, healthy, viable human child is wrong.

While innocent is too subjective to argue, the argument is not cut and dry. 1 week old fetuses are not viable and many laws don’t make exceptions on health. In fact isn’t viability one if the leading pro-choice indicators of morality in abortion?
I would add as someone who works in this space, that they also are kind of describing a mature board…

There’s the lifecycle of the non profit board

https://boardsource.org/three-stages-nonprofit-board-lifecyc...

Which describes different levels of engagement.

And also the life cycle of the organization.

https://socialtrendspot.medium.com/where-is-your-organizatio...

I do agree that many non profits function because of the will of the ED / CEO and a small group of staff.

Volunteers are always interesting - and depends on the board.

Some boards become obsessed with adding people to the board. Many boards have little to no on boarding process. It’s kind of like being hired for a part time job, and then being told that you come into work once a month/quarter/ annually.

(This is an exaggeration to make the point).

Many times the most functional boards are those that embrace working on governance and fundraising.

I agree 100% about adding board members for the ability to donate, or political cover. The right board members can add instant credibility to your organization.

Unrelated — grant writing can become very hard work! I am glad you are helping organizations navigate that process.
Can you share steps on how you configured it
H3 Indexes for Performance with PostGIS Data
> I still meticulously folder and tune my bookmarks

I tag mine instead... and I read them first (before bookmarking)
Refusing to answer isn't lying though.
Can anyone provide a summary of the logic behind this decision? Preferably with references to the source document.
"This is a small minority that just needs 51% of voter turnout"

I'm unclear what definition of "minority" you are using here. That sounds like a majority to me.

Comparing with poll numbers is not an apples-to-apples comparison. A lot of polls are highly motivated to support a particular outcome, but when you look into the details and ask questions a number of different ways, you get a more complex picture.

For instance, if you ask "how long should elective abortions be legal?" you may get an answer that seems to contradict "do you support Roe?". And then if you start to define "elective" (or even use different words) you might get a different answer still. I'm not saying which one is the "right" question to ask, but I am saying that it's not reasonable to reject actual vote totals in a free and fair election.
Can you explain (rather than state) what readability issue you think exists here?

I don't know if you see a real readability issue or not, but I do think it's easy to jump to "hard to read" when that's only true in a certain parochial sense: it's not what we're used to.
You’re assuming the legislatures of the states reflects the views of the majority. Which gerrymandering and voting suppression has long since assured it does not.
After ~15 years with it, starting back in the GrandCentral days, I recently moved from Google Voice to voip.ms, on my path to degoogling. The new service is paid, in a competitive domain, and so needs and has excellent customer service, and a much improved set of features. I'm happy to be the customer instead of the product.
Most of the "evidence" against lab-leak is just weird insinuation.

Speculation about how the virus wasn't created wholly synthetically: nobody is seriously arguing it was, or it wouldn't be SARS-family.

Arguments that the spike protein binding domain wasn't synthetically engineered: it didn't have to be. It could have been serial passage in humanized mice, considering that's what Daszak and co had literally proposed years before the outbreak.

Arguments that because the original SARS-CoV-2 wasn't perfectly optimized to bind to ACE2, it obviously didn't come from a lab: Obvious nonsense. Why would you expect serial passage through a small number of humanized mice be as effective at optimizing binding to ACE2 as an epidemic sweeping through tens, then hundreds of millions of humans?

The Laos expedition is interesting, but having only just skimmed it I'm not yet convinced it means anything. Any samples with very similar spike proteins collected AFTER SARS-CoV-2 became an epidemic could indicate that SARS-CoV-2 had recombined with existing bat coronaviruses, rather than being a zoonotic source of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

The sloppiness and drumbeat nature of these anti-lab-leak essays makes me not trust them. The lab-leak argument is speculative, sure, but we've sent people to prison for murder based on speculative inferences from circumstantial evidence; meanwhile, none of the arguments against lab-leak are solid.
> My personal opinion is that polarization has pushed both sides to be completely antagonistic towards each other. 'Own the libs, fuck the deplorables', no compromise. The jaded side of me says: vote in more moderates that are willing to strike compromises. Crazed jesus Republicans and hyperprogressive activists are terrible people to put into national office. They gain power by antagonizing and being unhelpful roadblocks for change, all while asking for the most stubbornly impossible outcomes.

This take is completely divorced from reality. "Moderates" are the roadblocks. "Moderates" already have the system they want and love re-litigating culture war issues like this, because it makes it easier to continue roadblocking. Give me one example of a "hyperprogressive activists" blocking something that needed to get done, and I will give you a laundry list of "moderates" actors blocking ensuring no progress gets made in this country. Progressives don't even say "deplorables" that came from "moderate" HRC. "Crazed jesus Republicans" I would say this classification bisects several groups with in the republicans, however they seems to be affective at driving change given the post we are commenting on.
Funny but one time I was in a long flight without any TV/Internet and decided to spend my time cleaning out the downloads folder. Took me about 3 hours. That almost 2 years ago and here I am with my downloads folder again with a few hundred files. Dang it.
That's precisely why I think an argument from property rights and self-ownership is more morally, legally, and philosophically sound, as I said. Your body is the most intimate and important property you have, to be secure in your person is one of the most fundamental rights. Being forced to host another life within your body and an infliction of suffering by the state, and in my view a violation of the right to security in one's person. I think that is a right that supersedes the rights any fetus may have, as unfortunate as we may feel the outcome to be.

Moreover, there are a lot of places where we morally and legally permit people to kill, that doesn't mean that we like killing or condone it in general.
> Base64 will make the fonts about 30% bigger, and webfonts are already too big

Does this actually change the transmitted size significantly?
I love it as a way to prevent Apple Music and other default apps from ever running, which happens from time to time for some reason I can never figure out.
Jesus, then just don’t use their ads tier and you won’t ever have to see ads, or even evidence they exist. It’s not “anti-user”, it’s anti-prepend, apparently, and it ain’t all about you and your particular life circumstances. Some people can’t afford (or justify affording) Netflix but would enjoy watching Netflix content. This will allow them to.

And supporting ads and improving recommendations aren’t mutually exclusive, and to suggest the former will prevent the latter is a false dichotomy. How long have you thought that their recommendations have sucked? Months? Years? Always? And in all that time they didn’t improve things to your liking. How does building out an ads tier change that?
Yeah, my list was just a list of things that kids need. "How are we going to pay for this???" really is just a subtle "fuck you it's your problem now" to the parents.
Just keep in mind 30% ruling is quite complex beast and if someone get accommodation from employer for example he won't be eligible to get tax break.
The idea of allowing users to have preferences around notifications that are easy to understand and navigate is really important to me. I just really want to have agency around what notifications I receive and when.

I don't want them to go away all together because I actually do like and use some of my notifications, but some of the user abuse that I suffer at the hands of unscrupulous companies who are either purposely obfuscating the process or simply don't have the resources to focus on that aspect of their marketing strategy is aggravating.
I'm not sure what your point is here? You are trying to calculate black voting power without even considering the longstanding and effective black voter suppression efforts in states like Georgia, so it's all academic anyway.

Replacing tyranny of the majority with tyranny of the minority isn't a win.
You mean that contraception which is in line for the next court decision?
The case you linked does not support your argument.

There the alimony decision was based on the rape victim giving consent from the standpoint of the civil laws which also govern parental relationships. That did not matter for criminal law because the victim was underage.

Not that I agree with the court here, but it is completely different from what you described.
Site seems to be slow possibly a HN Hug Of Death.

Here is an archive.org snapshot,

https://web.archive.org/web/20220624172111/http://www.iment....
I'd definitely love something like this to take off in terms of async collaborative editing that can involve the public directly, but I don't see how Github is the place for that. It should be a government-run server and require some form of authentication that you're really a citizen of the jurisdiction the law would apply to.

Even then, you'd get trolls, but at least they'd be American trolls and you're not handing over ownership of critical legal infrastructure to Microsoft.
Can you give some examples of what you mean? I use static polymorphism in C++ routinely and haven't felt particularly limited by it.
That's the whole point of the compromise.

What needs to be fixed is the cap on the House. Remove that and the larger states get more power in the House. For example the Democrats could get a majority to push legislation to protect abortion at the national level.

People need to fix the issues in the system rather than relying on the courts to legislate for Congress.
Is this inspired by inkdrop.app?
First, you can't call a fetus a baby just because it can become a baby. (Just as you can't call a child an adult just because it has the potential to become an adult.)

Second, pregnancy varies from person to person. You can't reasonably assume that all fetuses that are 279 days old will survive and become healthy babies.

Third, there are substantial physical differences between fetuses and babies. I'm sure you're aware that fetuses receive most of their nutrients through the umbilical cord, whereas babies do not.

Maybe I'm wrong and you're right, maybe "nothing physically changes about the baby whether it's inside the womb or outside." Let's test this hypothesis. Go feed a baby through its belly button and see how that works out.
To be clear - during 2014-2019 NIH actually paid $3.6M to EcoHealth Alliance under the grants clearly specifying the coronavirus GoF experiments in Wuhan with the "Human subjects included" checked. EcoHealth naturally kept about 75% of it as "commission/management fee/whatever" because conducting those experiments at BSL2 in Wuhan was much cheaper than the original experiments in US at BSL3+ (in those original experiments they were able to increase virality of the deadly, yet low viral original SARS by inserting spike protein to allow for ACE2 based cell entry - the hallmark of the coronavirus - and after that the research was moved to Wuhan https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/06/29/1027290/gain-of-...).

It was the 2018 proposal for additional money - EcoHealth naturally trying to double dip - for those GoF experiments in Wuhan to insert very human specific gene sequences into the coronavirus which was rejected as "Hell no, that is too risky!" by .. wait for it ... DARPA. Well as DARPA rejected it was still funded after that by the Fauci's NIAID.

And the rest is history - in November 2019 the coronavirus magically "naturally" jumped onto humans supposedly in the Wuhan market a thousand kilometers from the natural habitat of its closest natural siblings. We are all free to choose our Morpheus' pill, blue or red :)
Sorry I should have been clearer: I am referring to "Sonic Fiber" which is their own infrastructure, not any kind of resold service which they do offer in areas where they have not deployed their own fiber infrastructure.

In the Bay Area they have fiber in SF, South SF, Daly City, Redwood City, Berkley, Oakland, San Carlos, Burlingame, Albany, Brentwood, and probably more. They are rolling it out mostly in areas with poles at the moment because the cost of burying is quite high.

They've proposed "microtrenching" in SF to reach areas with all underground utilities but so far the city hasn't been very interested and it isn't cost-effective for them to dig up the sidewalks to install conduit. I hope that will change at some point.
This is such a one-sided view. The moderators get value, probably in excess of what $3.4MM (if a price could even be put on it), by having a properly running subreddit.
The thing is "classic old-fashioned" isn't something that is somehow timeless and is somehow outside of fashion trends. It's right in the name. It was fashionable but now it's old, old-fashioned. You can throw the "classic" in there all you want. The truth is all clothes come from some particular fashion. Some trends tend to change slower than others and that's what people seem to refer to when they say "classic" but it will change.

Wearing jeans at all is a trend. People have been wearing something other than jeans for far longer than they've been wearing them.
I'm sorry but it really is not a nuanced issue.

My mom marched with Operation Rescue during the summer that culminated in the bombing of an abortion clinic, and later the execution of the Dr that ran the clinic, in his own church, during service, while he was collecting offerings as an usher.

I know in painful depth every detail of how these people think.

It is not nuanced on their side. They outright reject empirical facts. They believe the earth is only 6000 years old, that the dinosaurs died in Noah's flood, and that evolution is a myth, not the central mechanism of all biology.

They do not care about the facts other than pattern matching them as rhetorical thought ending cliches.

They believe because they had an imaginary conversation in their head once, they are now born again, and have a private telepathic phone line to absolute truth. When they feel certain about something, it's the will of god revealed to them through the holy spirit. When other people express opposing certainty, it's because they have been tricked by the devil.

There is no good faith debate on the basis of facts or nuance with these people. You could spend years refuting every single thing they believe on a factual basis beyond any nuance or doubt, and they will blink, look at you, and then say something like "I know what's true in my heart of hearts."

Every single detail of how they talk about this and the actions they take make clear their actual grievance is regulating women's sexual behavior outside of their theocratic conception of marriage.

There is no need to defend these people as some sort of morally principled people confused by the underlying nuances. They are no where near that intellectually honest on the subject.
It is possible. I am not an expert in this area so I do not pay it as close an attention is it may warrant. That said, can you provide any links that would confirm your statements? The little I know is about Kavanaugh and Barrett and neither is an extreme in their writings ( although there are some unflattering bios on the net ). Which SCOTUS member are you referring to?

edit re concurrence:

I am going through SCOTUS blog(1) and the actual text(2) and I am not seeing the same thing you do. Could you elaborate a little?

(1)https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/06/supreme-court-overturns-c...
(2)https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf
I see the courts as more of a low pass filter for a democracy. If you elect right or left wing governments for a sufficient number of terms, you will end up with a left or right leaning court.
> You’re assuming the rest of the country shares your views.

65% of the USA currently says that Roe v. Wade shouldn't be overturned.
I did this for close to a decade and I agree it's important, but I feel it's less important on Monterey with Apple Silicon. They're really locked down a lot of things with the ARM binaries. And, there are a few things which have just become so tiresome when running as a regular user, that I finally just gave in and upgraded to an admin user.
The SEC's response to the 'meme stock' rally
The way I see it the courts are there to ensure our civil rights are not violated by laws. A law that "allows" abortion doesn't really make sense in that light. Unless the law is a prohibition on passing laws restricting this right, I guess, although that would be silly.
There may not have been significant moves in the last 50 years, but the majority remains pro-choice.
A) I guess I interpreted "consequences" more generally to also include the consequences beyond the disease itself.

B) I still believe that it would have been important. If it escaped from a lab, then those working in the lab could potentially have important information to share with the world about it. E.g. is it airborne, how much does it mutate, etc. They would have been studying it for a reason.
I really have to ask. Did we really not have any idea how corona viruses spread before? If so, what other virus families we are unaware now and why aren't we spending lot of money to prepare for all of them?
> If all else fails, I will have to switch my servers to online-mode=false, and add an authentication plugin to verify usernames 'manually' (instead of my server asking auth servers upon player login). This may require my players to use 'cracked' clients

For what it's worth, cracked clients are not presently required to join a online-mode=false server. Maybe they'll change this too, but presently legit clients can join cracked servers without trouble.
150 years out of 2000 is not consistent. If you value consistency, then ignore the current ruling as its relatively fresh and just carry on with abortion.
You are apparently unfamiliar with the legal systems in the US (the federal system and 49 states), which are Common Law[0] systems (Louisiana uses a French style "Civil Law" system):

"In law, common law, also known as judicial precedent, judge-made law, or case law, is the body of law created by judges and similar quasi-judicial tribunals by virtue of being stated in written opinions.[2][3][4] The defining characteristic of “common law” is that it arises as precedent. In cases where the parties disagree on what the law is, a common law court looks to past precedential decisions of relevant courts, and synthesizes the principles of those past cases as applicable to the current facts."

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law
Why do I have to keep looking up dictionary definitions for you? And why do you keep playing futile language games? Spoiler: you are still wrong.
My position is that you cannot claim women are “forced” to give birth (they have options) if, like the parent, you claim that no one was “forced” to take a vaccine they didn’t want (they have the option of losing their job).

It’s a matter of double standards here. People get all up in arms when you point out that you can still get an abortion if you just travel out of state. But if you point out that your only way to avoid taking a vaccine you don’t want is to lose your job, well no one is “forcing” you to take it! Likewise, I say it’s disingenuous to claim you’re forced to have an unwanted child. You just have to travel to another state. That’s a helluva lot easier to swallow than losing your job.

Just drop the phrase “forced to” around abortion is all I’m saying.
As I also mentioned in my first reply to you, the topic of how long the ruling lasted is a complete red herring, as this is not out of character for the court at all.

It is accurate that several judges lied to Congress during their nomination process and we do not have remedies or sanctions for that. (That are deemed politically rational)
>There is no way this can be upheld, right?

I think you and cm2187 above are making similar arguments, but to my thinking it doesn't really matter: with the time and money it takes to rectify the situation, unconstitutional laws do serious damage regardless. I'm not a lawyer, but oh what I would give for legal review on the constitutionality of laws as a precursor to implementation rather than post-mortem.

As another person suggests below - these states don't care anyway, they are following the same game plan as 1859.
Reread what you quoted.
>whether or not it's necessary

The thing is they've studied the revolutions of 89 and the more recent ones too. They know they don't know what will be the thing that will finally get people out in the streets so they clamp down on everything. Who could know before hand that Mohamed Bouazizi setting himself on fire would trigger the Tunisian revolution, and that that would help trigger the Arab Spring? China is very worried about potential Mohamed Bouazizis.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohamed_Bouazizi
Sucks that this happens in the Northern summer and I live at 60°N… It’s totally impossible to see this lineup from here as the planets rise essentially at the same time as the sun. Besides even at midnight the sky wouldn’t get dark enough to see anything except maybe Venus and Jupiter! Comet Neowise in 2020 was equally impossible to spot from here, frustratingly.
I found "The Roman Dictatorship: How Did It Work? Did It Work?" fascinating.

https://acoup.blog/2022/03/18/collections-the-roman-dictator...
> They do not have the right to an opinion on another person's life decisions.

The other side says that the fetus is a person with rights that are being trampled. And around and around we go forever. I am personally pro choice but I do understand that this is 100% my own subjective opinion.
This is always such a non-sense argument. The civil war showed that you can't secede and lose the battle. Do you think the Federal government would start a bombing campaign against the People's Republic of California? No. Would there be some really uncomfortable trade negotiations? Yes.
Thanks. It looks like all I needed was the project file. I was confused because when I followed the instructions to run dune init it created an entire directory structure and then I was confused about where my code should go (I haven't gotten to the chapter on modules yet).