skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yeah for sure. I put it on to sleep when I’m stressed often. Same with an On Cinema without the intros that are too loud.
Looks like the “company” that filed for the patent is basically the corporate research arm of UT.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/UT–Battelle

This makes the situation even shittier but also makes it more likely that the people who were issued the patent had little choice in the matter as it’s quite common for universities to basically patent every crap that a group of grads and their advising prof. produce on campus.
Capital a Agile. But ye, I agree. Scrum is hillariously stiff and very much not agile (the adjective).

However, given all the false prophets I just want run anytime "agile methods" is mentioned. I actually applied to my new job becouse they said they did not work by agile methods, which usually implies Scrum, while most ads wanted "agile dev experience".
what for? congrats, you old enough to pay taxes! now your choice is to be willingly enslaved for half of your waking life or die from starvation

that's freedom of choice fo'ya.
And how would you determine the intent?
I am sure those low income people are still expected to die for their betters on a foreign battlefield?
I think most important is considering the 1A. I don't think it's likely to persuade people on this topic, change their minds about what they believe in regards to the subject. But surely we can agree the 1A should be respected? Not everyone agrees life begins at conception/implantation/etc. Opening the door to one religion dominating the laws seems to lead to outlawing contraceptives (preventing implantation of a fertilized egg) on the basis of enforcing the belief that life begins at fertilization of the egg.

I don't fully understand anti-choice advocates and most of the ones I know refuse to discuss the subject, of those who do their reasoning most often comes down to their religious beliefs- and if the basis of outlawing a medical procedure is one specific religious belief, is it not a violation of the free expression of other people's beliefs to deny them the ability to make decisions because of one specific belief system?

Opinions aside, it looks like a fundamental disregard for other religions and beliefs is at play here.

I don't think most pro-choice people are anti-natalists nor would they advocate for the death of people who have been born... the main reasoning seems to be women's access to healthcare, privacy, not criminalizing the decision of people seeking a procedure based on moral judgements built on spiritual beliefs, protecting people from collateral criminalization relating to miscarriages, and preventing needless mortality in pregnancy-related issues.
> Also having children changes things quite a bit for all adults.
> I wish this article was longer.

Agree on both accounts. To the first point, I had a lot of friends and hobbies before having a kid and it feels that I'm slowly losing control of my time to the point where most of it is gone and I only have like 2 hours to myself. 4 if I want to be sleep deprived the next day.
Flexible Colocation for SBCs Like Raspberry Pi, Odroid, Jetson Nano and Similar
So.. used to love GeoGuessr and this made me finally sign up and pay for a month. Definitely the best $3 I ever spent - it went from 1am to 6:45am and I'm basically tearing myself off it. I travel a lot and I think I'm pretty good at nailing places. One minor quibble though. In the last 4 hours I think I only had two or three locations in the continental US. Granted I only had a few inside Russia and maybe ten in Bulgaria, but considering the coverage weights I think they're being a little extreme on under-weighting places in America. I also suppose it's boring if you can just walk along and find a street sign and google it, so maybe they're trying hard to bias against that. But after seeing a hundred nondescript farm roads in either a Malaysian jungle or some part of the northern European plain, and realizing everyone else competing was just running as fast as they could for signs to look up, I thought maybe the skill in this only exists if you don't have access to any other information. And in that case, they shouldn't weight out America because there's enough variety to make it a good case for figuring out which part you're in. /ramble
Searching his "globally unique name" yields 4800 results.

Good luck with that.
I have about 100 supporters on Patreon and this makes enough money for me to cover my bills, and spend my days swanning aimlessly about my town’s cafes and parks, drawing whatever I want to draw. About 15% of what I make goes to Patron and payment processing.
First of all: Everyone should have enough money to live a life in dignity.

However, this is about public open source projects. You can earn money with those projects. But then you also have to clearly communicate this. Either by asking for donations, sponsorship or offer a support contract. Because the default model of open source is: Here is some code, here is the license, feel free to use it without going through a paywall first.
Good, but it is still not an alternative for funding open source maintainers.
I think it’s because they are the maintainers of their projects, not maintainers of GitHub. So calling them GitHub’s maintainers sounds off, even if GitHub depends on their projects. It’s a weird application of the transitive property.

I suspect the maintainers would definitely say they are a user of GitHub. Most would not say they are a maintainer of GitHub (at least I don’t think so).
Is this propaganda? Most developing nations that have reached "first world" status, or close to it, did so via aggressive industrial policy, the thing that the already-wealthy Western world deterred developing nations from embracing for many decades (when they could) in favor of the "free trade" model the Bretton Woods institutions were designed to force on developing nations. This article doesn't even seem to acknowledge industrial policy, and instead harps exclusively on Western perspectives.
It's absolutely punishment.

A company gives to open source projects.

People complain about how little it is, and generate negative PR for the donation.

For a company, negative PR is a punishment.

What's the lesson here? At least the lesson some in the HN community are teaching is that if you are a big company and you donate to open source projects, you will generate negative PR for yourself.

(We can assume and/or question their motivations, but to me, motivations are almost always irrelevant to an act of generosity. Feel good about yourself if you help others out! Garner positive PR if you help others out as a company! Why should positive things for the giver detract from an act of generosity? Got a problem with the system? That's a problem with the system, not the person or company being generous.)
What child?
They launched a new Time Locked Progression recently named Yelinak that’s still in classic with Kunark unlocking soon. Would highly recommend for the nostalgia.
It's one thing for someone to see my username on a gaming forum, search for it, find my github, pick a repo, click on the license, and find my name there. I'm ok with that, I feel like it's a high enough barrier for casual trolls and bots.

It's another different thing for my name to be auto-completed by the most popular, publicly available language model. That I'm less ok with, and I'm sure other people will find absolutely despicable.

We have GDPR and Right to Be Forgotten for a reason.
Why are you restricting the discussion just to data science? In "general" science there are way more devs than just in data science / statistics, and Julia absolutely shines there. Don't get me wrong, the language is general purpose, the ecosystem is a bit niche for now, but still, it seems wild to restrict comments to such a small field as data science.
Maybe this is an artifact of memory management in the simulation's runtime?
Or that might be a situation of no one wanting to enact vigilante justice against someone who's not actively doing anything violent? This isn't hard to imagine. In my experience, anti-social behavior on public transit is regularly met with apathy from all the other passengers, yet I doubt you'd lump all the passengers as being anti-social and/or condoning anti-social behavior themselves.
Ask HN: How to protect against future cancellation and social credit systems?
I'm increasingly worried about being cancelled or wrongly flagged by a social credit system in near future.

I've started minimising what I share, limiting scope of my personal opinions, moving close people to privacy friendly platforms to chat about any sensitive topics, scrubbing old information, using cash and setting up basic privacy hygiene.
> I would like to know where this belief comes from.

In this case, from personally having conversations with two women who essentially said "I forgot the pill that day, but had sex anyway and got plan B in the morning".

Also the context in this subthread is about commercial advertising and the impression of "cool", not about medical information. Completely separate ideas.
I can understand that. I have to follow through with logic for why the worry won’t help.

“What is the upside for me if I continue to worry?”
An axonometric diagram exists for Stratford (actually, there are two -- one for the platform levels and one for the subway levels). I'm not sure why they weren't included in the Freedom of Information response; it could have been for security reasons.
> Worrying involves repetitive thinking … without coming up with any solutions

The problem here is not the worrying, it’s the lack of solution.

> The ‘Just Worrying’ Labelling Technique

This is not really a technique, it’s just a thought terminating cliche. There are many possible thought terminating cliches.

In my experience, rational techniques are far superior to thought terminating cliches.
Many of the successful YouTube creators seem to me to be of the type "somebody in a room, with a camera, Play Button on an Ikea shelf". Looks like moderate middle-class trappings.

If that is successful, what does the long tail look like?

I mean, there are a lot of people making videos. But I don't really believe many of those get their full income from it.
I’m very easily Googled as well and the prompt returned “Mick Jagger”.
BMW F Series Gear Selector, Part One: Failures
I have more respect for people who refuse money than for those who blindly accept it.
Tbh I found it hugely underwhelming. It just generates random text; it’s not much different from the old Markov ones, except slower.
Nitpick - advocating violence, specially as a personal vida is not a crime in most countries; promoting violence is, and it depends on the violence -death penalties and stonings are state-sponsored acts of violence, perfectly legal within their applicability in many parts of the world.
Also, crimes arent necessarily "bad", nor requinte violence. abortion in some American states is a crime, and stealing cars is also a crime.
Definitely felt like the thesis statement to a longer piece, but I suppose if the answers were obvious we’d already be doing them.
No it was "can we throw you at the enemy". Which depending on how the war is going can be as low as 12.
I’m curious: have you informed yourself about the actual legal doctrine Thomas is talking about, or is it just about the social policy to you?
Alas, Haskell's built-in strings are horrible. Anything serious would use Data.Text or Data.Bytestring (depending on the situation).

Unfortunately, most of the language and libraries got written before reasonable strings were available. So you still see lots of things taking linked-list strings.
"The prices of Bitcoin and Ethereum, the two most popular coins, have tumbled more than 70 percent from pandemic highs; the NFT market has cratered; and optimism is in short supply. Everywhere you look, the dominoes are falling: One prominent firm, Three Arrows Capital, is reportedly approaching collapse, while other companies are desperately seeking bailouts to stay afloat."

As the article indirectly acknowledges, this sounds just like 2008.

I didn't see the banks all pack up their tables and go home then.

In fact they were collectively bailed out by government. That is, each and every one of us, indirectly.

edit: I certainly don't think crypto should be bailed.
> Tunnels have a smaller height difference than bridges. Only need clearance for the height of a cyclist, not for trucks or trains plus electric lines.

Well, sure. Tunnels built FOR BICYCLES ONLY will have this advantage. A bridge build FOR BICYCLES ONLY would have similar small height requirements so this seems kind of moot.

Seems that the rest of the ideas are mostly based on the same one; smaller inclines/declines. The "work first, then coast" is not, of course.
It's one of them, sort of.

Yet another reason we should be protecting sex workers more and prosecuting them less. I think a lot of the negative acting out we see in young men would be dramatically reduced if they had more safe, legal options here.
The article talks about that at the end:

The East Asian development model adds to export oriented manufacturing financial repression and land reform. Financial repression in this context is the state controlling people’s savings and through a combination of law and incentives, increasing the amount that’s invested in domestic manufacturing firms. Key tools of this are capital controls, which prevent capital from leaving the country to get higher returns internationally, political influence over bank lending, and currency devaluation which in addition providing advantages to exports reduces consumption and increases savings.
What hits me hard is that the author emphasized that Charlie had the strongest emotional connection with Algernon, the mouse.

I guess the reason for that is not only that Charlie saw himself in Algernon, as they were in a similar situation. But Algernon was the only being which did judge Charlie and his IQ.
No method is 100% safe - and we are talking about something that happens multiple times for most people, it will fail due to pure statistics.
That quote seems to be from one of the Tr'ondëk Hwëch'in elders, Peggy Kormendy. Doesn't sound too different from church prayers and the like to an outsider. To each their own.
What is the drug designed for and why was it taken?

There are drugs designed to cause a miscarriage and commonly called "abortion pills." That would be intentful.

But, say, a woman takes ibuprofen for a headache and it happens to have nasty side effects. That would not be intentful. (I don't know if ibuprofen can do this, but feel free to slot in nearly any other drug.)
Russia would then bomb the Ukrainian part of this would be rail infrastructure, claiming it's used to transport weapons. But here is a discussion about this:

https://en.thepage.ua/economy/ukraines-switch-to-european-ra...

Romania still has an old Soviet gauge railway from Reni, Ukraine into the Galati Danube port via Giurgiulesti, Moldova. Poland also has Railway Line no. 65. Slovakia has two such lines, Uzhhorod to Kosice and one from Chop to Dobra. All of these should be repaired and used to get the grain out of Ukraine. There are also some older standard gauge lines from Poland and into Ukraine.
Thank you for pointing this out. Also while re-align is probably an incorrect word, there definitely has been an essential transformation of both parties. The new deal coalition and Clinton’s third way have little in common.
Come on. You can disdain everyone and everything, and claim that people are incapable of having a serious conversation, and where does that get you? To a world where you believe no one is as smart as you and no one can possibly relate to what you're going through? Have you stopped to consider that all the human beings on this board, and even those around you on the street, have inner lives and complicated thoughts and sometimes when they talk "surface level" they're just trying to establish communication so they might be able to talk more seriously once they get to know you?

People are a jewel box. You find the good in them among the garbage, and almost every person has something you can absorb from them, even the negative ones. This is called being a member of your species. Like it or not, you are one. Look around and instead of feeling superior, appreciate the fact that every other human here has trodden upon the same lonely paths that you have.
...and were amazed we could do any of it at all.
Making “adulthood more desirable” is more of the same coddling and extending childhood indefinitely. More prompting, enticing and encouragement isn’t going to help.

At some point kids are going to have to make decisions on necessity, not desire. Based on hunger.
I guess there’s always plausible deniability
An appeal to fewer emotions in politics can sometimes come from a place of privilege, but I'm coming to realize that it's still USEFUL.

I'm also in an odd, semi-orthogonal situation: I'm a homosexual female of child-bearing age, so while I may be impacted by this, it's far less likely than for other women and the situation would always be one of those tricky exceptions (plus, since most women are raped by men they know... if you know me and you rape me without murdering me, you're an idiot, and dead women don't get pregnant).

The issue with things being too emotional isn't that the emotions are bad or that people don't need support. They absolutely do. The issue is that if we ONLY focus on emotions and keep ourselves in panicked, fight-or-flight mode for all of our waking hours that we can't plan or strategize effectively. Deciding what to DO to make change requires a little emotional distance.

I think it's possible to both acknowledge the devastation people are feeling while also thinking it's counter-productive to ONLY have that conversation.
Anecdotally (according older people I know) having a supply of regular sex was way more difficult before. More shaming, more religion, less welfare, etc, may explain it. At the time, marriage could solve that biological need.

edit: 80+ year old's in conservative Europe
So go live in a city? Why are we having this discussion? Nice things cost money, that's well known.
They are both "maintainers who use GitHub's platform" and "maintainers of software GitHub depends on". "Our maintainers" is just as normal as "Our neighbor" or "Our users".

To pick the most adverse example: GitHub could equally talk about Gitlab and say "Our competitor". They're clearly not saying Gitlab belongs to them or giving them some kind of connection that doesn't exist.
Where "you" means specifically males aged 18-25.

Coincidentally, 1973, the year Roe v. Wade was decided, was the last year anyone was drafted into the military.
Dasel 1.25 adds a validate command
Dasel 1.25.0 adds a validate command. Select, update, delete and validate data from multiple file formats (JSON, YAML, TOML, CSV, XML)

https://github.com/TomWright/dasel
Bless the Maker and His water.
There’s not much to this article beyond the headline and even that I basically disagree with.

Adulthood grants you freedom and autonomy over your life. Childhood is highly variable and you often have very little control.

I went to a decent public school in the US, a lot of the teachers I had were dumb if not cruel. It was like spending a lot of time doing busy work in a prison run by the least successful adults of the previous generation.

Great teachers made a difference and were outliers, but were rare. I’ll take being an adult and having control over my life a thousand times over being a child that has to wait until they can be free.
The issue with a voting tax is that the people who pay it might vote to make it harder for the people who don't to start paying it and voting.
I can't see a reason why anyone would avoid scheduling time with you.
Persuading religious fundamentalists that their core ideology is fundamentally flawed by reasoned argument is about as likely of persuading Richard Dawkins and other New Atheists that their core ideology - their certainty about the nature of the universe - is similarly flawed.

Let's try, however. Questions about metaphysical notions, I'm afraid, cannot be addressed by the scientific method. Let's contemplate the simulation hypothesis, the notion that we live in a perfect virtual world running on some computational substrate 'somewhere else'. As it is a perfect simulation, no scientific test can reveal it to be a simulation, correct? Hence we cannot rule out a not-so-supernatural entity having built this simulation and turned it on (we could call that the Big Bang moment if we like). This philosophical notion can be extended to any religion on the planet, any fantasy story. All we can say to be logically consistent is that no one religion is any more supportable than another, from this viewpoint.

So, have we convinced the New Atheists to recant? I doubt it.

Now, as far as the abortion issue, to be diplomatic in these affairs we must seek common ground, and ignore the grinding of teeth and shouting on all sides. We should be able to agree that if the only time a woman became pregnant was by her deliberate choice to do so with the planned intention of raising a child, and there were no negative outcomes, like severe developmental defects that risked the life of the mother, then it would simply not be an issue, would it?

That's about as far as common ground goes, however. Personally I think the religious right are grotesque hypocrites as they refuse to back rational public health policy, quality childhood education for all, social support networks for children and mothers, or environmental policies that reduce exposure to teratogenic substances. They seem like blinkered religious fanatics and the notion that such people are susceptible to rational discussion is frankly ridiculous. These are the types of people who, if they had nuclear weapons, would likely set them off to achieve their fantasy of Armageddon and the Second Coming. The religious organizations they adhere to run brainwashing and mind control programs that target children, as a means of enforcing political and social control, and they've been at it for thousands of years. That's my view anyway.
https://gdpr-info.eu is very explanatory.

With just a tiny bit of search, you can find a list of the fines levied by this 'impractical to enforce' legislation.

Not sure where the tsa reference fits in.
For now, that may be true. But codeberg and forgefed are working on adding activitypub to gitea. How about we contribute to it so that we can have a fully-FOSS alternative?
> I can’t understand what people mean with “let your thoughts float by”. For me, noticing them is synonymous with interrupting them, and it feels like I’m suppressing them most of the time.

The way this works for me, say, when I meditate, is to acknowledge a thought and put it in a box labelled "for later".

I'm not ignoring it, I'm just dealing with it when I _want to_, not when my anxiety kicks in or when my brain tries to fill the silence in my head. If it's important, I'll remember it.

I still suck at this, but I'm somewhat better than I used to be. So, it's a bit like exercise, and one can get better with time. It's also very personal (ymmv). Again, this way of looking at it worked for _me_.
If it crashes often enough it will be banned by governments as there are also other negative side effects (e.g. it enables certain criminal activities like ransomware).
Shotcut 22.06
Wow costs only increased by ~30% from projections in 1998 -> 2015.

That would be a huge success story here in Canada (and I’m sure the US) that it didn’t go 100%+.