skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I like the analogy of the entrepreneur luthier and more generally the master craftsman. I've had the experience of building software "on the assembly line" and, and also been lucky enough to be paid by the same employer to work in a way that is much closer to the "master craftsman" end of the spectrum. I much prefer the latter.

But it's only in side projects that I really feel I'm able to work as a master craftsman, without the ever-present burden to just ship a pragmatic compromise that delivers value to the business so that I can move on to the next pragmatic compromise. I wonder if this is another reason why, say, doctors working in hospitals will often also have their own private practice — sure, the extra money is nice, but the autonomy and mastery that comes with a side business might be even more important.
I’d love to hear some feedback from any users on HN as well.
Great. Now developers will need to check license compatibility before picking the copilot model.

In reality through, we'll all just end up using the MIT No Attribution License copilot.
It's not just the naming: I prefer String if I don't care about the data structure size, since converting a String to Box<str> can be costly (allocation and copy if the capacity isn't exact) and carrying a capacity is free pretty much all of the time.
That's no excuse. Attach all licenses if necessary.
Everything I've found suggests that 1800F is minimally required for full cremation.

But even if full cremation is not the goal -- I have laid out a sketch for what the logistics of a large scale field cremation operation would have to look like.
This is perhaps the most video recorded war ever, and certainly a candidate for most propagandized. Has any Ukrainian partisan produced anything remotely resembling this shape? Even if my estimates of operating temperatures and corpse throughput are off, they are off by fractions, not magnitudes.

Where is the evidence that anything remotely resembling this operation is occurring? Where are the freshly dug up fields that would be required to inter these half burnt remains? Where are the convoys of flatbeds carrying incinerators into the country? Where are the giant plumes of smoke? Stacked bodies?

Do you have literally a single thing? Or do you have a substantial reason (instead of convenient preference) to believe that the operation would have a different shape instead?

It is simply amazing to me that you feel you have any right to be smug, given the fact that you nakedly and unabashedly believe a conspiracy theory.
Those great 18th and 19th century stories of rambling into the unknown are definitively English. The ability to walk across land without worry of being attacked (by man or beast) is because of England's strong legal and social rules, and that every predator larger than a badger was killed off long ago. At most you could expect an angry farmer, but more likely you would be seen as just another rambler. Try that in 18th century Africa, Asia or even North America and it would not have ended well.
that awk expression fails here (v5.1)
LinkedIn is nothing more than public reputation polishing and virtue signaling.

It is interesting/confounding to me because I think that most of us have some inkling that there is something valuable there. Some reason to maintain a profile and participate but we just can’t articulate it.
Recall spending an hour putting together a group for a dungeon in wow. 30 minutes getting to dungeon. All because we needed nature resist for a a new dungeon.
Then spending 5 hours working together. because we all so happy to have a functional group.

The fun part is the priest core was the only group that for our nature resist gear. So we tanked that week.
I haven't loved debugging systems whose primary data structure is a Map.
My wife uses Chase/JPM and we've never had issues. I had AMEX before but got rid of it due to the annual fees but also had no issues.

Do your own research though--I am definitely not an expert in churning/credit cards, so there may be better cards etc. for your lifestyle and whatever type of reward you prefer (i.e. cash back vs airline miles).
No.

Here it is in its entirety:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Please point out the part of that amendment that references the right of people to have concealed carry for the purposes of self defense. Because it seems to me that they tried to be as obtuse and textualist as can possibly be with regards to Roe, but apparently the second amendment grants all sorts of rights that don't actually exist in the Constitution.
It does not scale (at least not yet with current AI). It does cost everyone a bit of time but it also depends on you and how much trash you generate. Recycling is for the benefit of all of us and we should all do our part irregardless if a CEO or a house cleaner.
lol "the presenter".... who was Ken Thompson
No, that is not what that word means. But perhaps a blind "no u" might qualify as appropriately incinsere?
Yeah, you do have to obey the terms of the license if you base it on someone else’s code even if it “is the only way to implement it.” Even if it is only a single line.

At least according to Google’s monetization policy when it comes to music.
Neither, you exclude a whole bunch of people who don't want to be domesticated, so offer everything.
Why would you read an unsound argument?
Hydrogen is essentially a headless storefront, you have complete control over how your storefront is rendered, but it does come with boilerplate and helpers for some standard primitives that most people will want (e.g. carts).

Custom themes allow you to template on top of the Shopify front end, giving you less control.
You didn’t address that Boule reported a crime on his property and law enforcement respond, which is probably cause; that is no warrant was required and once law enforcement has it, they have the right to enter the property regardless if the property owner requests they don’t, which in this case was oddly also Boule.
I did but it died on me. I've been with a candy bar ever since. Been a decade since I gave up on smartphones. Only took me about two months. These days I check my phone once or twice a week, sometimes not at all. Good thing the battery lasts for many days
He could’ve turned this into a huge win.

Sacks face during the group session says it all
The difference is that the AI is doing it on a much larger scale.

Analogy: the law has no problem with you memorizing the license plates of cars you see as they pass your street; however, building an automated system for recording and storing license plates in a database is a different story.
And if the license terms conflict?
Isn't the SimpleString just String? Most of the complications disappear if you avoid str entirely. The one simplification which I would like to see added is support for string literals that produce a String. (s"foobar" syntax has been proposed).
the socratic method gets pretty close to trolling, if you try a little bit.
That's how they want you to read it. They literally measure it by whether anybody goes to a place or stays in it. So if you make some part of your city into a place nobody wants to be in, then nobody will be there.

And, sure, the people who aren't there won't be committing crimes there. They'll go commit their crimes somewhere else. Or I guess maybe they'll just sit at home until they shoot themselves...
Long game is either population control or world domination.
Personally I think Final Cut is the best version of BR.

2049 is a masterpiece.
Easily my favorite game of all time. Like many, my hardcore playing years were 1999-2004. Over the years I did drop into Project 1999^, and it’s always an amazingly fun bomb of nostalgia, but it falls short of the 99-04 era magic.

^ Still do, even just to hear the Kelethin music or to run from Kelethin to Erudin. I may just do that this weekend…
Did your friend eventually find a workable solution? I wonder if they could reach out to the beverage company and ask for a distinguishing feature that’s easy to recognize for computer vision but wouldn’t affect the brand’s look-and-feel for human vision. Perhaps a machine readable version of a resin identification code [1] encoded as a pattern visible from any angle?

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resin_identification_code
Are we recording?
Then you should have built two (or more) different non-conflicting models.
>we are part of a balanced ecosystem

we're really not though. Extinction is about as natural as anything else. We've had many in our planet's history some wiping out 90% of life, for a variety of reasons. Your car runs on dead dinosaurs and trees that have been pressed and liquified into the sediment and we didn't bury them there, nature is hardcore that way.

Which is not to say that a balanced ecosystem isn't a great idea, but recognize it's an artificial one. Condemning hunters or humans or roads and just letting the Aurochs run wild is no guarantee for some kind of balance.
What? No: https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.61.0/src/alloc/slice.rs.html#854.... ToOwned for [T] gives you Vec<T>.
> Eventually labor costs will even out globally,

Somehow I have a feeling this will never happen.
Credibility somewhat compromised by:

> Civilian AR-15s ... are hands down the best rifles you can own for self-defense

But it looks like the holder of the sole-source contract for ball powder must have determined the sequence of events.
I dono, that was pretty obvious but I didn't know how he could tell the difference between France and Belgium... He has videos listing off all the clues though... Apparently Belgium's telephone poles don't have blue things that French ones do.
Zuckerberg doesn't want employees to demand that Meta stop giving Republicans money.
From an efficiency perspective, it seems "cheaper" to presort each item upon ingestion rather than mixing everything up and sorting later. For most people, placing an item in the right bin is a subconscious action on "autopilot".
Stress. Especially on Twitter, every news today starts with “NEWS ALERT!” + a boring news or analysis that everyone knows. It produces stress. The content of the news is always highly disappointing.
No, the concept of a soul mate is that you have a bind that transcends this life, that there this is a journey your souls decided to take together before your birth.

Ups, downs, whatever, it will work in the end, because that was the mission. To teach a lesson. Maybe the lesson was how to overcome differences?

Now the common modern usage of soulmate just means “person was meant for me” and that’s open to 100% of your criticism.
Systems that make it too easy to accidentally get in over your head and turn into a sucker are probably bad for society.
Better not to use russian software

I see this from time to time but I am curious how people people know how many of the packages in Windows, Mac and Linux were written by or contributed heavily to by Russian developers. Surely people did not stop using nginx?
who cares if it copies licensed code?

if it increases developer productivity by 10-20%, its a huge net win for global prosperity.
bankwestbank.com - Banking services by the Department of Redundancy Department

this made me laugh out loud so thanks.
It's not noticeably more difficult to drop an item in 1 of 4 bins vs 1 - and it reduces spoilage.
> That's the problem with any superintelligence story; they are by definition hard to write without being superintelligent.

Ditto this, but for any domain specialization.

A lot of fiction gives me a bad case of something which I don't have a term for but it seems like it might be the inverse of the Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect:

Basically, I was fine with the story until it got technical in a way that I know well, and the technical aspects of the story were so egregiously sloppy, I could no longer suspend my disbelief. And then even the nontechnical aspects just annoyed me because I figured, if the author was such an idiot they couldn't bother to look up how lasers work or whatever, they probably got everything else wrong too. Even the parts I'm not a specialist in, which I had previously just been taking on faith, I am now forced to assume that a specialist in those things would also find them laughably bad. And the whole work is ruined for me.

(To be clear: If the author would just say, "these are magic lasers" or some other form of "a wizard did it", okay that's fine, it's fiction, I'll accept that, let's see how the story develops from there. It's when they try to claim they're real-world lasers but then merrily ascribe them impossible traits, that I get brain-jammed.)
… which is exactly what the article explains, if only you'd have bothered to read it before commenting.
I was about to say. Stating that the product achieves 90% of the Bloomberg terminal made me immediately lose interest. They lost my trust at the first sentence. Long time terminal user here.
I usually get my barley in a fermented soup, served cold with herbs. Otherwise known as beer.
I’ll just cross my fingers for do expressions getting adopted. Before then functions work for me and none of the gist convinced me otherwise.
On NetHack's 35th Anniversary, It's Displayed at Museum of Modern Art
Note that if you don't want this guarantee, you can use [u8] and Vec<u8> (and Box<[u8]>). This does not support all string methods unfortunately, but there's work to do that.
I agree.

One exception may be when there are a few very chunks with a low interest, but perhaps to reduce the number of items to track the OP may want to pay them completely. It's a bad theoretical move, but it may help to reduce the administrative problem to send the money to each one.
To the author (and to the poster!): Thank you. I couldn't have found this at a better time. I'm right now (privately) writing about things of a very similar nature and this has made me indescribably inspired and grateful. I know a lot of depressed people feel the same, but I have to repeat the cliché that it's as if he's writing about my life.

> That's why I love writing- it feels like I'm talking to someone who gets me.

Beautifully said. I keep ignoring this lesson for long stretches of time until my mind is in such a messy state that I sort of instinctively can't do anything else but write and write and write, which I've been doing for a few days now, nonstop, after months (years?) of self-neglect. The contents are usually very similar, repetitive, self-deprecating and apparently unproductive, but more often than not I come out of it reinvigorated and more hopeful about the future, and sometimes with slightly less messy thoughts as a bonus.

I've wanted to start a blog since I was a teenager and be as open about my thoughts and feelings as the author of this post is, but I still haven't gotten over the fear of judgment about letting my existence, let alone my boring, dumb, coward, pathetically self-loathing self, be available to an unboundedly large audience of complete and potentially hostile strangers. The voices in my head are right now telling me: “Almost no one cares about what you have to say. Of those who do, many will care only to the extent that they can use it to ridicule you, or worse; and, if people like that ever find you, it's all over.”

I guess this comment is, if anything, a gesture of appreciation for this person's courage to be vulnerable. But it's also a painful challenge against these voices.

They're now begging me not to post this comment, or to delete it as soon as possible. They're screaming, telling me I know I will regret posting this.

But I won't be listening to them today.
There's something called "Data-Oriented Programming" and something else called "Data-Oriented Design". I can never remember which is which. This post changes nothing.
"I realized a lot of people were just circumstantial friends."

It's not a lot, it's nearly all. Friendships with people you see often develop without a lot of effort; it's very difficult to maintain a friendship with someone you don't have physical interactions with. In my own life, it has never happened. Absolutely zero friendships from childhood, school, college, past jobs, etc. lasted after the physical proximity ended.
The many steps needed to make shoes close to home
It has downsides, but it also has upsides. Calling it "String" doesn't tell you much about what exactly it does or how it relates to other types, but it does tell you "hey if you want to read and write text then you need to learn about this type". If it was called StrBuf or something, I might worry about new learners seeing that name and assuming it was some advanced concept they don't need yet.
Seems like we need similar legislation as tobacco packaging. Dedicate 40-60% of product to machine readable identification of what type of recycling it is.
The iTunes MP3 encoder is really bad, so nobody should want it to.
Completely agreed. As a Bb Terminal subscriber, I am insulted by this product’s tagline, because it is false advertising.
VCs will be highly skeptical of a tech startup without a technical co founder. You may be able to raise a round on a pitch deck and vision but expect it to be an uphill battle.
>>>> One abstraction that is very useful is linear algebra which is an abstraction without errors.

>>> Bullshit. Your claim that there is no abstraction error in linear algebra (when run on computers - we're in subdiscussion related to programming) is false

>> You fail to realise that we can prove theorems about linear algebra
USING COMPUTERS

> Obviously I realize we can prove theorems. If I didn't realize it was possible to prove things

You have been arguing in bad faith by either putting words in my mouth (when run on computers) or deleting key phrases from my reply (USING COMPUTERS - reinserted by me)

These 2 statements by you contradict each other

"Bullshit, Your claim that there is no abstraction error in linear algebra (when run on computers - we're in subdiscussion related to programming) is false
"

"
Obviously I realize we can prove theorems" -----> USING COMPUTERS

It is clear that you thought of computers as IEEE floating point number crunching machines, with implicit floating point errors. All of your arguments rested on this irrelevant point. You even condescended to teach me about floating points using citations not needed by anyone who has attended CS101.

You failed to realize that finite sized representations of computable real numbers exist, by definition[1]. One such representation could be a finite sum on surd basis, instead of using a binary basis eg sqrt(2) instead of 1.414.... and the most general form is a theorem prover like Lean.

All of these misunderstandings in your head because you failed to realize the gist of the Church Turing thesis ' - Everything that you do with your brain and paper can be duplicated on a computer.

In any case, I am glad you learned something today. Computers don't relate to math via IEEE floating pointing numbers, the connection is a lot deeper[1]. You won't acknowledge this, but frankly speaking, I can't really stand out- jargoning pretending to be an honest discussion. I did give an opportunity to you to correct yourself with my first comment. But you only doubled down - more jargon, bad paraphrasing of diagonalization, putting words in my mouth, followed by removing key phrases from my replies amongst other bad faith arguments.

[1]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church%E2%80%93Turing_thesis

To establish that a function is computable by Turing machine, it is usually considered sufficient to give an informal English description of how the function can be effectively computed, and then conclude "by the Church–Turing thesis" that the function is Turing computable
If it's not a team sport for you, you fooled me. I'm engaging with you because you are hyper-partisan.

There was no realignment. Who owned the slaves? Who was responsible for Jim Crow and the KKK? Which party set up the Great Society which destroyed the black family? Which party controls the teacher's unions and the public schools?

The Democratic party. 100%. Those are just facts.

We can't fix this until we quit the partisanship. We need to fix the public school system. You'll remember the teacher's union official, who, when asked when he was going to start thinking about the kids, replied, "When they are old enough to vote."

EDIT: Please read at least the introduction to the "Dixiecrat" splinter party page for history[0]. (Wikipedia isn't known for having a conservative slant on things.)

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dixiecrat
This is laughably naive. Western Union payments are high-risk for the ransomer, since they have to go pick the money up. Also, Western Union has pretty low limits on how much you can send ($10K for US->US transfers, less for international transfers). Getting a million dollars (a low ransom in today's ecosystem) via Western Union would require at least 100 pickups, each of which comes with a risk of getting arrested.

There is a reason ransom amounts skyrocketed when cryptocurrency entered the picture, and no, it's not because it was "the early days" pre-bitcoin.
Interesting,
Set it to find out for myself
You probably don't sell code snippets that you collected from various sources you can't remember without knowing whether you're even allowed to sell some of them.

That's what Copilot does with extra steps. I don't see why it should be different just because Microsoft mixed the code snippets in a blender to obscure what they're doing. It's code laundering.
>> loitering and foot traffic

I laugh at how in this article that foot traffic is seen as a bad thing. HN has seen hundreds of threads opining on how we should get rid of car lanes and open up space for pedestrian traffic. But this article talks of pedestrians as a scourge to be eliminated. Cops in cop cars are out there keeping the sidewalks clear of people. How many pedestrians or mass transit riders, fearing police encounters, will op to travel instead by private car?
Direct link: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/gaming-night-museum-jean-chri...
If your code is sufficiently distinct that block scope is useful, and there's no obvious contextual clue as to why it's distinct (like an if statement), put it in a separate function to explain why it's distinct. The article mentions this argument, but responds with some handwaving about how technically it's valid JS to use an unnamed block statement. I mean, sure, but does that mean it's a good idea?
I think the normal thing is to drop trash down a tower with a forced air cross-current. Glass gets diverted less than plastic by the cross-current.

You can also use various densities of liquid, to catch different densities of plastic floating vs. sinking if you've already crushed things up to avoid air bubbles. However, then you need to later separate the liquid from the shredded garbage.
> The author gives an example of using Copilot to list prime numbers. That's not a good use for it.

That is literally the first kind of usage promoted on the main landing page for Copilot. It shows Copilot filling in the body of function definitions in three different languages.