skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> compared to after it’s been codified in the legislature

The legitimate reason it is reversed _now_ is that it is _now_ when the matter is before them in the court of law that conflicts with Roe in a way that is hard to reconcile against precedent.

If your complaint is that it hasn't been codified into law by the legislature since 1973 (and you're right -- it hasn't) that is not the fault of the judicial branch, rather the legislative.

To borrow from your analogy, it's more like a repository deprecating its code, watching everybody for years claim that "they're going to delete this any minute now" and nobody stepping to the plate to take over as maintainer.
And in 10 years that will be joke that phones have to have usb-c while no one using them.
> Donating blood != killing a fetus

I don't think that's the argument the earlier post is making. They are arguing that you cannot be compelled to do something to save some else's life even if it won't harm you, and doubly so without due process.

However, I think viewing someone's body as their own property is a better way to frame this. If you decide a fetus is trespassing in your body, where should the state intervene? The state couldn't force you to harbor someone in your home during a winter storm, even if you left your door unlocked and kicking them out would surely result in them freezing to death. If you believe that a fetus has adverse rights against the body it's growing inside of, then you need to make that case.
> from industry and regulation

I agree. These tools should make our crash landing softer than a laissez faire policy. But

1. I'm pessimistic about the true intent of the powers that be. While paying lip service to climate action there is hardly any real action: renewables are just an extra energy source on top of the existing cheap fossil fuels that give nations some independence vs the gulf states. There is a scramble for every newly discovered oilfield - and it's not because they want to prevent the extraction. And

2. If governments succeed against all odds in phasing out fossil fuels we would still be faced with massive climate change sooner or later - be it a new ice age or whatever. These are things that are out of our control - we need to make sure we can adapt, not try to control it.
Right, so if reasonable people are all aware that part of success is luck based (success = luck/opportunity + skill), then there's no reason to point it out unless it's critical to the conversation.
That's, like, just your opinion, man.

Meanwhile the natural sources hypothesis has made one prediction not found yet (animal zero) and the lab leak has made two. Unfortunately, judgements about this are made difficult because "relative believability" is inherently subjective, so we can endlessly argue about the relative merits of competing hypotheses it is while the biggest suspect is under suspicion of having destroyed key data -- because they did suppress information in the early stages (and are refusing credible audits now). Meanwhile, entropy is happening making further revelations from bioinformatics progressively unlikely. Shrug.
Funny then how for the first few months of the pandemic the emphasis and public guidance was on desinfecting hands and surfaces and endless debates about how if masks actually help.
What...literally everyone knew there was AT LEAST airbone risk of infection. Not sure where you got your pandemic information?
If you are trying to draw an equivalence from a mother having a duty of care to her unborn child to someone robbing her house, yours is the argument that doesn't hold up to scrutiny.
I acknowledge that a person is responsible for what happens in their own body. The key point is that getting an abortion IS taking responsibility, not its abdication. If you are pregnant and do not want to give birth, getting an abortion is the only responsible choice. It would be far more negligent to give birth, risking additional medical complications, and bringing an unwanted person into the world.

I am under no more ethical obligation to preserve the life of a fetus in me than I am to preserve the life of an intestinal parasite that I've ingested.
Oh god. the 1 day before birth argument. Cuz that happens.

> the child could simply be delivered
What do you think a 2nd or 3rd trimester abortion is?

> Are you saying that the value the life of those children should be hinged on how much they are loved by their parents

Matter of fact it is. Millions of children are abused by their parents, 1900 of them died in 2019 due to direct abuse. Do you think forcing childbirth upon women unfit or unwilling to be mothers will bring this number down?

> I think that women who have sex and conceive children should be held responsible for raising those children.

What about men? Because men get to leave.

And thank you for asking, I do have a uterus. Sorry about your kids though
> CNN reported the number has never been above 36% for “should roe v wade be overturned”

the poll said "completely overturned", which is the more radical position. roe v wade being completely overturned is not the same as "delegating to the states" per your original comment, because the federal protection could be weakened to only support specific cases or require an earlier termination which would leave more room for state laws.

You're framing the issue in a way that's misleading, because while the majority of americans oppose completely overturning roe, another majority could support weakening roe or limiting it to specific cases
If they follow this particular line of evidence (which requires them excepting their own gross negligence) then not only would they be out of a job but may find themselves in jail.

"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it." - Upton Sinclair
"There was no evidence that the video conference was not being conducted with a real person. Apparently it is deep fake. The LKA Berlin, state security, is on."
My apologies; I was unaware of that nuance.

I doubt I'll ever be able have over $250k in savings at any one time, so it wasn't something that seemed too much worth my time to learn more about.
Thank you for posting this. WHO-China report found that COVID almost certainly came out of China and the market is just the amplifying venue. It's the racist and xenophobic groups that are trying to incite hatred against China by spreading propaganda.
That's true, there are sudden changes in our collective evaluation of what rights a human has.

There are some really plausible reasons for birth, for example, as an important turning point:

- Before (and in particular during) birth, a child's life and physical well-being is immediately tied to the mother's. There is a real risk of one's sickness killing the other.

- Before birth, there is no mandatory, conscious care-taking. The embryo is automatically taken care for. Afterwards, it requires a (excuse my wording as a parent) shit-ton of work to keep a kid alive, happy and successful (however you define that)

- The risk of death is vastly higher for an embryo than for a child (with about 1/3 of pregnancies being unsuccessful) and decreases strongly after birth. I suspect this is one of the reasons why abortion is often intuitively seen as different from euthanasia.

That said, I completely agree with your argument that it's wrong to argue as if there was a sudden point at which humans are suddenly and naturally protected but aren't before. But I think that not many advocates would argue for such a radical position.
To be fair, I am sure Rust catches a fair amount (compared to C++ which would catch 0). I just think that phrasing rust has having 0 memory errors can be a tad inaccurate.
Given that I used to believe the zoonotic hypothesis the assertion of confirmation bias is a bit surprising to me.
Head of Product for Zulip here. I'd love to dig in deeper to understand what's confusing to non-technical folks as they are starting out, so that we can keep working to improve the product and documentation to address it. If anyone is up for a chat, please reach out by email at support@zulip.com, or in the #feedback stream in the Zulip development community (https://zulip.com/development-community/)!
> That's more than 150 years ago. Matches pretty much my definition of consistency.

So out of a 2000 year history, "consistency" means something that was invented 150 years ago? That seems like an absurd definition of consistency.
I was fortunate and managed to see all five at a similar occasion many decades ago. My image-stabilized binoculars helped a lot in finding Mercury in the glowing sky near the sun. It helped that I was on a work mission to a remote area with just the clear uninterrupted sky.
> Gay men will be arrested on "reasonable suspicion" of having had gay sex.

"reasonable" in this case meaning "visiting the home of another gay man", let alone "living with one".
That's a good point, but until it drops in whole blocks, I think the liability might lie more with the user. Kinda like all of Tesla's non-alpha driver assistance features where to use them the user has to opt-in and agree they will maintain full control of the car even when using these features.
Abortion access is not a social view. It's a health necessity, as is contraception.

I'd understand if "the left" was trying to take away some other person's right, but this is the opposite. They're trying to preserve rights.

A tyranny of the majority in conservative states is now restricting rights, it's going to cause death / suffering.
Amazon launches a GitHub Copilot-like AI pair programming tool
Nah, productivity kind of sucks, although with weakening EUR it could become more attractive.
Hearing the body-autonomy argument is pretty funny right now, given what the last 2 years have been like.
> Well I certainly can’t blame you for that. However, it’s far from clear whether the change to the catechism can even be reconciled with prior teachings at all.

If one views the argument that the prior teachings were infallibly proclaimed as incorrect, than there is no need to reconcile them; the prior teachings were simply in error.

Unsurprisingly, Francis has not only identified the previous approach as in error, he has both explained where the error is and provided an (unnecessary) explanation of what led people to make the error.

> there is considerable confusion about this change throughout the church and Pope Francis has not really offered any clarification

No one is confused or has any need of clarification. “It is per se contrary to the Gospel” isn’t the kind of statement that leaves a whole lot of room for different readings.

What there is is disagreement.
Something like: When he quit, he chose a last day that was after his shares vest, which his managers agreed to. When they fired him, it was immediate, before the shares vest.
I certainly did. I used a lot of features in Netscape that IE never had, and at university it was _the_ browser used on campus in the late 90s.

IE 5 was a buggy browser lacking a lot of features, but was used often by people not building things online. And forced on people by bizarre site requirements. Though this came worse with IE6.

Microsoft was embroiled in legal issues of their browser at this time, and anyone with a sense of logic (most programmers) could see being locked into one piece of software instantly degrades the value of that software.

Sept 2002 was when Phoenix was released.[0]

IE 6 came out only a year before Phoenix.[1] And you if you were involved with Slashdot back in the day you were tracking browser usage as a daily trend. Phoenix was doing well.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firefox

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Explorer_6
It's very close to polling which breaks the question down more narrowly than simply "do you support abortion".
> I struggle to believe that a single pro-lifer would say this is the reason behind their beliefs.

Of course they wouldn't say it out loud: that would be giving the game away. Instead, judge them by their actions. The same crowd that wants to prevent abortions also wants to prohibit contraception, allow unrestricted gun ownership, and cut back on any social programs that support families.

These actions are consistent with a puritanical, anti-sex society; they are not consistent with a "commitment to life."
I think what they meant was a dose that still lets you enjoy it, not a dose required to enjoy it.
Idk man. How come human lives have more value than other primate lives? Sounds like a perspective that comes from privilege (as in lucky enough to to be born human.
Not having the dates and versions was the main reason I switched to nginx. Every new project or company I had to try to get Apache and Tomcat to work together, and there was no runbook or cookbook for this. Just a series of articles that were very good, but only if you found the right article for the right IPC strategy for the correct versions of Apache and Tomcat.

Eventually the only thing to work reliably was mod_proxy, which is also the slowest option. And if I'm going to do that, I might as well run nginx, whose proxy configuration is only about half as mystical.

Of course the longer I use nginx, the more I need the subscription based features, so I'm experiencing an in-kind phenomenon where all of the google searches take me to the pro version. We aren't complete hobos. We have licenses for ingress and between services. If you're trying to reverse proxy in front of a process-oriented web server (Rails, Nodejs, Python, etc) you're talking about another order of magnitude and they are not interested. Every six months I keep looking at how hard it would be to implement a strategy better than round robin in the built-in implementation.
Down the memory hole!
Yes, you put it better.

Infix is tricky because it doesn't scale well to complex expressions. I think Python does it right with plenty of infix keywords a la "if thing not in myset: ...".
There is also allegedly a Wuhan CDC facility meters away from the market where disposal of lab animals happened (I cannot confirm this myself), so if that's true, that's certainly another possibility.
> This is you dictating how I behave - which I find a much larger pile of BS, personally.

Societies dictate how their members behave in significant ways according to moral beliefs. It's always been that way and it always will be. The libertarian solution is BS in this context, because it appeals to libertarian morals that aren't actually held by the people who are being complained about.
The equivalent claim would be a "mile long locomotive".
It's blooming btw.
I used to have my desktop as a downloads and temporary files area. I had a cron job set up which moved all files unmodified in a couple days to a separate temp archive folder. I had another cron job which deleted all files older than 6 months from that archive folder. (By older, I mean comparing the last modified date).

The act of moving a file away from the desktop or that archive folder meant I wanted to keep it.

Bonus points: my desktop tended to be clean despite me creating lots of random temporary files on it.

At some point, while switching between OSes, I stopped porting that 2 scripts. I should probably write them again...
"Transparency" does nothing when the scammers are so emboldened they commit fraud in broad daylight because they know the regulators aren't paying attention and they can make off with the money faster than you can analyze the data.

>Do you think there are more scams happening in crypto than the current system?

Yes, absolutely. Pretty much everything I've seen in crypto is a scam or fraud. The tokens have no value and the whole thing is about pumping them up and dumping them on someone. I have yet to see any blockchain company that actually delivers a useful product that can't be made cheaper and more efficiently in tradfi. The "financial innovations" coming out of defi are all either blatant fraud, ponzi schemes, or are ideas that are known for decades/centuries to be so risky and stupid that no functioning market would allow you to do them.

>If so then you're brainwashed.

Less of this please.
It is a little suspicious, but also not too far fetched: Where would you put a lab researching Coronaviruses? Somewhere near where it exists in the wild.
Jump to the Lab and see the various principals of Quantum theory including stateful machines.

https://lab.quantumflytrap.com/lab/nonorthogonal-state-discr...
The question I think I'm getting at is about who you are and why that matters in a given case. Blockchains are good for keeping identities intact once established, which is different though maybe it'll help overall.
Jefferson would mostly be blue. The emerald triangle is left/libertarian and a lot of boomers there have no access to Fox News and are still salty about the time Regan landed a helicopter on their ranch to shoot up their weed crop. Jefferson only sounds red because only crazy right wingers with hybrid Confederate/Jamaican flags on their trucks support the idea. The reality is they would still need to live and vote with their neighbors who drive Subarus.
This is the best way that I know of:

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/Presig...
> Underfunding

> Staff have little enough work to do that they can reduce their work week by 20%

Overstaffing / underfunding, two sides of the same coin.
For me collecting bookmarks is part of a larger activity that involves any information I want to gather for use later on. Bookmarks is usually about assembling a reading list or collecting resources on a topic. I used to think the larger activity was note-taking, but I'm realizing that's not really it either. The activity is something very general like "collecting information". Collecting, notes, bookmarks, quotes, transactions, events, equations, etc.

I built a service to solve this problem [0], but I'm not sure how to communicate what it is. Does it collect and organize bookmarks, yes. But I also use it to track of my spending, do my budget, keep a work log, make financial projections, manage tasks, send myself reminders and digests of all the above content.

[0] https://tatatap.com
Was very annoying when protonmail.com became mail.proton.me
I think this article is a very good example of the sort of pseudo-compelling argument. It's like one step along the road between 4chan conspiracy to Tucker Carlson. It's lots of stuff that sound like reasonable arguments, but are actually not. It starts by couching itself in the actual concensus - other people concluding that's a possibility! - Yes, that's true, but what they're concluding as a possibility out of a cautious appraoch, you're pushing as actually being true. Then they start marking their own homework - we published our book and everyone reasonable and smart said it was great, and everyone who disagreed clearly didn't read it. Now we go to the greatest hits - the big bad mainstream media.

Now we start mis-representing our opponents. All we want is an open scientific debate! But it's too controversial! That might not at all be true, but we're going to say it anyway. It might be that the actual scientists decided that there weren't merits to your argument to justify inviting you to debate it, but who cares - let's just say they're afraid of controversy.

People are threatened by our work. We're not extremists! We're moderates! We're perfectly reasonable people who are just going to slip in this laundered conspiracy theory that Fauci funded the Wuhan lab. But don't worry, let me quote this anonymous scientist to back up every worst accusation you could make of scientists.

Everyone is covering this up because of vested interests you see! If you look up the author you'll see that he comes from this as a complete neutral outsider making cold-eyed judgements of the evidence. He's definitely not from the exact far right nutter idealogue ecosystem that you'd expect him to be from.

There's a nugget of truth in the article - the lab leak is possible as an explanation, and that China isn't to be trusted to investigate. There's nothing in this article that actually advances any evidence beyond that. The rest of it though is just the same thinly veiled conspiracy theories that have been going around since Trump going on about "The Chinese Virus".
this is the conservative slight-of-hand democrats & intellectuals don't understand. Invoking originalism on a 250year old document is in very basic fundamental terms anchoring social progress to 2 centuries old thought.

Add to that the Senate's massive favoring of 'underpopulated states' plus filibuster 60 and you basically get a deep understanding of the state US is in today.
That was my thought as well since post is 23rd June 2022 - like author missed what is going on with a lot of stuff.
And Elon is ALWAYS spot on with his timelines.
Here's a pretty good summary...
https://www.aclu.org/news/civil-liberties/supreme-court-reje...

Basically, the Court removed any remedy against state actors who fail to uphold your right to remain silent.

Prior to Vega, if the state ignored your right to remain silent, you could seek redress with the courts.

Post Vega, that right to seek redress no longer exists.

On paper we still have the right. But, we have to no way to hold the state accountable when it fails to uphold that right. Is a right really a right if the state can ignore it with impunity?
> You randomly got one that confirmed your bias.

When I listen to someone tell me objective data I'm confirming a bias I never had to begin with? The amount of projecting you're doing is extraordinary. If a doctor told you your kidneys were failing after getting them tested (I already linked the research for you to read, but clearly you're afraid of information that doesn't confirm your bias), would you then go find a doctor that tells you your kidneys are fine? Your fear of information is literally going to kill you. This is the mentality that leads to anti-vaxxing.

> If you are open minded for real check

This is ironic since you're not even open-minded to listening to a doctor, or medical research, or anything that disagrees with what you already think you know.

You are a perfect example of the Dunning Kruger effect.
Meh. They're half good, half snobby and self-righteous.

He famously refuses to date his blog posts. And in this case, the page is years old, no longer relevant to the content of his blog and contains techniques that are not recommended and will in fact slow down your page load.

Either keep content relevant, or put dates on it so people can be aware that content might be outdated.
Moonjump – A server that redirects you somewhere interesting