skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No, its very clear that the right to gun ownership is an individual right: https://constitution.findlaw.com/amendment2.html

>The Second Amendment is naturally divided into two parts: its prefatory clause (A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State) and its operative clause (the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed).
I have been reading The memoirs of Jacques Casanova, The Modern Library edition 1929, translated by Madeleine Boyd. And now I see, it seems to be an edited version. Will have to check out the A. Machen translation. Thanks.
I’d love to see an Ekranoplan do some flying (or is it sailing? Ekranoplaning?).
> I'd actually push back on this - I don't think it's that inconsistent. There's obviously a real different between a fetus at various stages of development and a child, but that doesn't mean it has to be binary yes or no.

Oh, I personally believe that and I think most people do. Sorry, maybe we've lost the plot on this a little:

> The critical difference is the individual rights of the fetus.

I argue that society has already decided this. Nearly all abortions occur in the 1st trimester, and nearly all abortions occurring afterward are in tragic circumstances. This is all squarely within what Americans support.

> I think that's why it's probably healthy to have this fought out democratically rather than legislated via the courts.

I argue that the constitutional rights of the embryo/fetus (such as they are) do not outweigh the constitutional rights of the pregnant person. If someone thinks an embryo/fetus has rights, they have to contend with a bunch of unpalatable things [0] (criminalizing many popular forms of birth control, IVF, the morning after pill, miscarriages, stillbirths, etc.). At the most extreme end--personhood--they have to either defend a brutal no exceptions regime, or an inconsistent exceptions regime where you're deciding whether or not an embryo/fetus is alive based on some irrelevant circumstances.

> So it's not about deciding if the fetus is a child or not, it's about considering the utilitarian tradeoffs when you take into account its development, suffering, and the suffering and developments of the mother.

But again, I also argue that society has already decided this. We actually agree with the current regime: nearly all abortions occur in the 1st trimester, and nearly all abortions occurring afterward are in tragic circumstances. Why do we need to punt this to the States? Why are States rushing to put stricter and stricter controls on abortion?

The answer is that Republicans fomented a moral panic in the 70s in order to pull evangelical votes. They proceeded to push misinformation into the public about abortion, the kind of people who get abortions, and why they get abortions. This distorted the public view. Again, in reality the state of abortion is what the vast majority of Americans support. There's no need for this to be an issue anywhere. It's a wedge issue pushed by a craven political party in order to gain power. That's literally the beginning and end of it.

[0]: https://harvardcrcl.org/the-many-problems-of-personhood/
When that's a possibility that's actually on the table we can talk about it - today we have the opposite problem.
You think think that Clarence Thomas would declare the 13th and 14th Amendments null and void? What?
What about the FedEx one? I cannot count the number of times I’ve seen companies or even government offices using complicated and scammy-like URL names.

It’s difficult to know if URLs are legit or not. HTTPS used to be a good enough indication of legit URLs, but not anymore.

You could also think on googling the company. But those ads that look like real search results are well known to include scam websites!

I’m a developer and I find it difficult to distinguish some URLs. Now imagine how difficult it can be for grandpa or really any person out there that doesn’t know about these kind of scams.
It wasn't disinformation. It was no secret that one of the reasons masks weren't recommended for general public use was that hospitals and clinics should be supplied as a priority.

If you got a different impression than this message, blame wherever you get your news from.
No, it can't. Literally the only thing that changed is that you can't sue a cop for not reading the Miranda warning to you. Your actual Miranda rights are unchanged, and cops still have to read the warning.
Nice! I've been considering using DuckDB for our product (to speed up join's and aggregates of in-memory data), it's an incredible technology.
Now redo the same study but with Stanford or Harvard branded gear. This thread is hilarious to me.
We've already kind of seen a form of that in Hello Barbie

https://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/hello-barbie-the-cree...

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/nov/26/hackers-c...

The book looks good btw! And I'm checking out her TED talk. If you're secretly an AI book ad pushing algorithm you just got me...
The way progress is made on tall and wide problems is different. On tall problems, you make progress "climbing", and don't move forward much until you reach the peak, and then it's behind you all at once. For wide problems, you can make a little headway "forward" in little increments, which is easier to track.

I think a lot of wide problems could be approached as tall problems, but the incentive structure in some places is set up to measure how much "forward" movement is made each day, so you're punished for "climbing" since people think that you're staying still instead of doing work.
Sadly, a lot of these servos have terrible resolution, especially because a full range of motion corresponds to only a very small fraction of the duty cycle spectrum.

Someone should make "good" servos that have make use of more of the duty cycle.
I still don't think I understand how that helps Midwestern and Southwestern states other than California, unless you mean the goal is to give California a way to stop using as much.
There are 22 if you include 6-week bans and ones that have laws that are still being challenged:
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2022/06/24/1107126...

I'm not sure what the exact right number is, but it probably comes down to the details and how you classify them.
Neuronlike Memristors Could Superspeed 6G Wireless
> Moreover, women who cannot afford or want them should not be risking pregnancies to begin with. Sex makes babies. To make a baby and then try to absolve yourself > To argue that human life is "just a clump of cells" based on your convenience is literally what hitler to the jews.

Are you suggesting that tumors are people too, and that they have full rights?
Where do you work
My anecdote: type of exercise makes a huge difference. Lots of steady-state cardio makes me hungry. After several hours of boxing / Jiu Jitsu practice, I have to force myself to eat, even several hours after practice has ended.
Stretching of the continents drove ancient global warming event, say scientists
So was the USSR. So is the Russian federation. The words 'A republic, not a democracy' mean almost nothing.
I've entertained this discussion in good faith, yet now you're belittling my diction and accusing me of wasting time.

I'm done here.

Have a nice day.
Going from “doing it for fun” to being paid for it is probably going to destroy the spirit of a community.
> Btw, iirc, SML doesn't have this: there you only have 1 parameter but it could be a tuple

Nah, SML does also support automatically curried function definitions, it's just that by convention that feature didn't get used as often. I tried to find out why that was the case a while ago, and stumbled on this explanation: https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammingLanguages/comments/jde9x...
So basically you want IMDB but for video games?

This exists to some degree but most of the examples I can think of are specifically about retro games, rather than any and all video games. Lemon64 and LemonAmiga exhaustively document who worked on what in the c64 and Amiga games scenes, for instance. MobyGames does cover modern games but a few checks of modern games sure don't have any credits beyond company. IMDB does cover games but also doesn't delve into any more detail than company.
> The relationship and obligations that a mother has to her child are fundamentally different to the relationship and obligations I have to a random stranger in the ER

You define "child" based on a religious definition. That's /your/ religion, not mine. Feel free to follow it all you want, you don't need to involve the rest of us. We're not talking about children, we're talking about fetuses.

> Do you really want to be play that game? Because I'll have a field day with you.

Ah, an internet tough guy. Feel free to "have a field day." Your entire argument is premised on the idea that a fetus is a human life, which only has basis in religion.
Let me assume you are male..

Also, what happens with rape victims? Or you know, women often know about their pregnancy weeks after the event?

Also, you are literally less likely to die from donating your kidney then a women giving birth. Do you really have no empathy whatsoever? Giving birth is brutal, you have a no matter how disgusting it is to write but technically a parasite growing inside you sucking out every resource you have causing often life altering changes. And we are not even at birthing.

I am also a guy by the way, but that is exactly why I believe that the only opinion we should have on the issue is to listen to women, and the only voice we should have is to shout over old men deciding on a topic not concerning them.
> I think that women who have sex and conceive children should be held responsible for raising those children.

The misery in situations where consensual decision-making isn’t the fact of the matter is IMHO tragically under-explored in this framing and in Alito’s opinion. Without respect to the legal and political status of Roe, I still think it was morally right where it limited government intrusion and authority.

Will you feel responsible for this kind of outcome when it occurs in America, as it has in the past and does in the world?
I am hoping MS is gonna hide them based on usage.
Many years ago, an IT security person I was talking to referred to humans as "the one security-critical component that cannot be updated". It's a bit cynical, but not entirely incorrect.
"Arms" includes nuclear weapons too, strictly speaking. After-all, the term for the period in which the USA was building ever more powerful nuclear weapons was called the "nuclear arms race."
What's your explanation for the fact that Moderna patented the very specific 19-nucleotide sequence that codes Sars-COV-2 furin cleavage site in 2018?
I don’t know why you keep bringing up religion, I have not mentioned it at all. Perhaps you are conflating the reason for some states passing of anti-abortion laws with the law itself.

Either way, the federal government does not grant this right, therefore it is up to states to decide.

> It's a constitutional right (9th amendment) to not have personal liberties stripped by the states which are not enumerated in the Constitution. Freedom of speech, freedom of religion and right to privacy are all enumerably applicable to preserving this liberty.

None of these rights apply to abortion. If anything, there should be an enumerated right to bodily autonomy.
Inventor of the shopping mall denounced his dream
I think you're missing the trees for the forest, in the same way the OP describes. If you don't take interest in, and pay attention to the significant details, there's no way you can understand whether "... the money is being spent to drive the mission of the non-profit successfully...". I have served on a non-profit board and observed this problem.
Not everyone owns a car. Plus, that's just AZ women. A woman in Miami will likely have a 14+ hour drive to get an abortion.
Another commenter pointed out that this behavior ("class-anxious but at the same time class-confused") is described as typical for middle class by Fussel https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class:_A_Guide_Through_the_Ame...
> Flat, shared memory [...] nice op codes and indexing, as I recall.

Yeah, that was what the guy working with the Moto chips smirked at us slaving on Intel 808x contraptions, back in those days ...
There have been any number of experiences in my life that I did not appreciate until decades later, sadly in some cases after the person who gave it has passed away.

Being a member of an exceptionally well run club in which I was one of the youngest members was one of them. This club wasn't strictly a volunteer group but it put on fund raisers twice a year which turned it into one.

Successful volunteer groups have a number of things. They have a leader with some sort of coherent idea of what we should be. They have a stream of new enthusiastic members that can muscle through plans and projects that are at risk for falling apart. And they have old members who are practically spectators, and whose primary contribution (besides perhaps being a reliable source of dues) is as story tellers. They know Chesterton's Fence. They can tell you why it's there. They remember who has helped the club out of scrapes, and whether they are likely to do so again or that charity has run out.

The oscillation in clubs comes when the leadership gets too involved, too invested, and either burns themselves out or starts alienating people. There's something to be said about keeping things a little at arm's length.

A group I used to work with went and turned themselves into a non-profit, and created a board. The board was half people who most of us had never heard of, that in theory could open doors, most of the rest were sort of honorary titles, bestowed on the more gregarious long term members but not necessarily the people I'd want in that position. I moved around then so I don't know how or if that board has strayed from the group culture before they formed.
Survey of Built-In Concurrency in Programming Languages
Because the Senate represents the state, not the population of the state. That is why California has more representatives. Every state is equal in the Senate. This is basic civics.
Google "are ideas copyrightable".

Copyright protects the specific, tangible expression, not the idea or concept itself. So in your case, having "got ... ideas by looking at the source code of a GPL project" doesn't necessarily mean there is any violation of copyright. Employers will often require that employees haven't seen sensitive code at all (clean room) as it avoids any possibility of copying the code itself and provides powerful evidence if they're ever sued, but that's not a legal requirement, just a cautious practice. To read code, learn a concept from it and then apply that concept in your own code is fine (as far as copyright is concerned) as long as you're not copying the code itself.

I am not a lawyer and the above is not legal advice, ofc :-)
> I'm not sure what your point is here?

While the EC could "erode voting power" of the majority in favor of minorities we don't like, it may also favor those minorities we do like.
Valid concern. You don't like being told what to do with your body/property by someone else that doesn't understand those concerns, and isn't impacted by their own decisions. It seems like you would have a lot of empathy for all the women who are in the same position today.
I wish I was as innocent as you but not everyone is so lucky.

In my case, I've improved my health care issues given to me by my parents with keto/carnivore.

Hope you do the same.

Note: you never mentioned anything about yourself, not what you eat or train or anything. Just the cancer and the paper.

The paper you linked had nearly everything wrong starting from the high protein, the acidosis thing, the meat/eggs being associated with diabetes, the doctor recommending vegan.
>I think this breaks the "don't compromise usability" rule set at the top.

What? It's more, not less usable. You plug in a key and now all you need is a 4-8 digit PIN for most operations while still being secure, not a 20+char random password, and it's not tied to a specific system either. HSMs are one of the rare cases in security where they are both more secure and better UX.

>chances are the Mac they're buying has some form of Touch ID for authentication

I addressed this. That only applies to new and new-ish notebooks unless you also get a special Apple-only keyboard. Even for notebooks, it only applies if you have the notebook close, open and/or are happy to reach for it. If someone is doing the common pattern of their notebook docked at their desk to another screen and peripherals at least some of the time, now Touch ID is most decidedly not right there (again, barring sticking only to Apple keyboards). And not everyone is 100% exclusively in the Apple ecosystem, even if they have lots of Apple stuff. If website credentials are tied to keys, one can just unplug and plug it into a Linux/BSD/Windows system and still login fine.

I don't disparage making use of biometrics on Macs or iDevices a single bit, and indeed I think it's weird and silly that Apple hasn't done Face ID for the Mac. But that doesn't mean USB keys or smart cards aren't super handy for a lot of Mac usage same as they are on any other system. It's a fairly polished built-in supported feature of macOS, no reason not to consider taking advantage of it.
Could build your own protocol ontop of SMS. Double opt-in, encrypted and signed. See for example MMS.
But who can read the messages that go to the valid number? How can unwanted people gain that access?
That's not how you do scientific criticism. Your comment is unsubstantiated opinion/accusation.
I don't understand why it is almost always "rape and incest", both on the part of people considering exceptions when they ban abortion or people trying to get exceptions into someone else's abortion ban.

Incest can be nonconsensual, in which it was also rape and so would be covered under a rape exception.

Incest can also be consensual, in which case what is the logic to treating conception by incest any different than any other circumstances of conception?
It's not a red herring, as it demonstrates that the protection via the Supreme Court was not in any jeopardy of failing to function, as it has successfully protected women's rights for over 50 years.
Nark Rober - 200 wallets.
https://youtu.be/jnL7sJYblGY
Really? I was under the impression that we've split enough geographically that the citizens of red states would support this decision.
https://www.traverselegal.com/blog/accidental-copyright-infr...

https://revisionlegal.com/copyright/what-is-accidental-or-in...

https://btlj.org/2015/10/is-copyright-infringement-a-strict-...
I'm not ignoring anything. Eminent domain is not at all applicable here. You seem to be ignoring that eminent domain applies to private land in order to make it available for public use. The land involved is already public, it belongs to the states. Honestly you really don't seem to have much of any meaningful argument or explanation other than repeatedly using the phrase "eminent domain" incorrectly.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31839392
No it is not, because it is undisputed that viruses can evolve to infect humans.

If we had 100% solid proof SARS-COV-2 originated in a lab, it would not change our approach to detecting or mitigating future outbreaks. We always have to prepare for either.

It’s not like it never occurred to anyone before that dangerous infectious agents could escape a lab. It was a well-known possibility and was incorporated into U.S. federal pandemic preparedness planning since at least the George W Bush administration.

An accidental leak from a lab must still be detected, and once detected, public health measures initiated. The procedures are the same as for a natural origin.

The fundamental lesson from COVID-19 is that we cannot let our guard down. The Trump administration did in many ways, and so were not able to detect or respond fast enough.
> Yet the EU continues to stand.

Your thesis seems to be "countries and states can oppress people and society won't totally collapse", which seems like a very weak position to take. I'd hope you don't think "not collapsing" should be our goal. We want life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all people, right? Not life, liberty, and happiness for some, and well, at least the government remains standing, for the rest.

Like, in some sense, an oppressive government standing is worse than it failing, right?
https://www.madisonbrigade.com/library_bor.htm

"The 'militia' was the entire adult male citizenry, who were not simply allowed to keep their own arms, but affirmatively required to do so.… With slight variations, the different colonies imposed a duty to keep arms and to muster occasionally for drill upon virtually every able-bodied white man between the age of majority and a designated cut-off age. Moreover, the duty to keep arms applied to every household, not just to those containing persons subject to militia service. Thus the over-aged and seamen, who were exempt from militia service, were required to keep arms for law enforcement and for the defense of their homes."

This issue is that the States became lazy once the Feds got their standing military. All States should require citizens to muster for arms and disaster training at least twice a year.
Do you understand the difference between the constitution and the courts? The court does not invent rights, nor should it. It is the federal government’s responsibility to codify rights, and it is the courts responsibility to affirm them.

Separate but equal was precedent for a long time as well, would you be arguing the same for that?
> It does not give the courts legislative ability.

But it does. Our common law system treats judicial rulings as law. There is nothing stopping the supreme court from ruling on literally anything they like. They could make cars illegal in the next session if they wanted.
And yet fetuses created one way are entitled to protection and fetuses created the other way are not. Why do you feel this way?
It is common for popular fiction to replicate themes and situations that people observe in life but cannot freely discuss.
How 'Dune' Composer Hans Zimmer Created the Oscar-Winning Score
Thanks. Fair weather moderates swinging between whichever party is advantageous, or less scary to espouse principles from within, wasn’t what I was talking about, but I see that you were. I’m glad you clarified that and hopefully we both understand we were talking past each other for part of this.

I do see specific suggestions from moderates. A lot of them have to do with campaign finance reform. Others have to do with alternate voting systems, like ranked choice. Ranked choice can be advantageous to extreme parties, of course, but they also make 2-3 more self-aware middle parties possible because they can stay in power as the #2 or #3 choice without having to engage in tug-of-war.

I agree that personal wealth is an unfortunate limitation to anyone seeking to run as whatever is in vogue D or R. I only mentioned Ross Perot to remind you of a well-known independent candidate. The 90s were a long time ago, yes!
Going for my credentials! Smooth move.

"Birds cause some fires" is a conclusion you can find with a minimal search on Google Scholar. It's been documented before. That seems to be the only contribution of this paper.

This was voted onto the front page of Hacker News. That was a mistake. End of story.