skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
So you want to force women to die and easily preventable death (e.g. ectopic pregnancy)? That's the only way "completely correct" works here - the trigger laws on the books that result in that outcome were in place before the court took this case. They chose to rule broadly rather than a ruling that still enshrined the right of someone to have a medical procedure that would preserve their life say in the case of a non-viable pregnancy that would end in the death of both the woman and the fetus.

edit: i was wrong about the trigger laws having exceptions for life endangering pregnancies - its the new laws the same people are passing that remove the exceptions. I still stand by my statement, because the "completely correct" ruling allows those exceptions to be removed.
Libertarians should be protesting against violence toward the unborn child... libertarianism's core principle is nonviolence towards others.
I think I have a 68HC11 sitting around that I picked up for a project and never used. I wonder if it's worth anything?
Do you know how secure it is compared to Magic Wormhole?

I remember a few years ago reading a comparison between two file sharing apps, and if my memory serves me they were croc and Magic Wormhole. One of them had a litany of security holes but I don't remember which of them. I googled but couldn't find info on this.
I have 80 feeds in QuiteRSS with 659 unread posts right now. These feeds bring in over 1,000 posts per day.

Some are news and blogs but also sub-Reddits, Google News searches, and Kijiji searches. Until a couple of months ago I had some eBay searches but eBay killed their RSS feeds. I don't use it for YouTube but they do support RSS.
Cars are one of many ways to increase land supply and probably the least resource and fiscally efficient way to do it. If we want to make mobility and housing cheaper then we need to make these both more efficient. Car dependency is expensive, but changing it is one of the many things we need to do before we can become a post-scarcity society.
Why not both?

What about a boycott of businesses that openly gloat their support for this radical supreme courts decisions?

The USA had better get its pro democratic forces moving before it’s too late.
> These drivers are for Windows 98 and ME. You probably could get them to work on Windows XP, but good luck.

Why no love for Windows 2000? I mean it's 22 years past the freshness date, but so is ME, 98 is even staler.
I use an iPhone app called "Sky Guide". It sends me notifications of interesting events, and the app itself has a "Calendar" page with a list of everything upcoming.

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/sky-guide/id576588894

Separately, if you are a New York Times subscriber, you can also subscribe to their Space and Astronomy Events calendar feed:

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/science/astronomy-s...
It's great to see a perspective from the ground on this.

I'm originally from an "emerging market" (aka 3rd world country) and I don't share the enthusiasm crypto bros do about emerging markets interacting with crypto.

It's rarely from a beneficial place. Crypto is absolutely perfect to allow a corrupt government to quietly siphon the nation. No planes full of dollar bills, no heavy gold bricks. Just a movement from one digital address to another.

Sure in a pinch it might be a lifeline, but it's a flimsy lifeline and these countries need a lot more than a glorified remittance system to recover. It's fun to laugh at NFT bros trying to buy overpriced restaurant food, but last few months have likely been disastrous for a lot of very poor people.
If a crypto-themed restaurant can’t get it right, what hope do the rest have?
Some of the greatest and most successful companies or products come to light at difficult times. No free floating free money also means less competition that lives off on that money and less customers who are subsidised with that money.

If you have an actually good product you should be fine, just make sure to present yourself in the right light as the dynamics are changing. Things can go a bit more meritocratic.
> You're mad at the author for not pointing out the WIV

Yes, an article comparing two possible originating locations should obviously show both on that graphic (especially when both places are well-within the frame of the image); I can't see any good reason for the author to have omitted that.

> but then you also grant that it looks like the market was the center of spread

Yes. And that's not contradictory to the lab leak idea, because people aren't trees and they go places after work. I think it's entirely reasonable to hypothesize that the virus escaped from the lab on a person and ended up successfully taking root in a less-than-sanitary wet market just across the river. If two-headed turtles started showing up at a Popeye's 20 minutes away from the Turtle Experiment Laboratory, would you say that Popeye's was the source of the two-headed turtles?

> You still need to explain how there are two distinct lineages at the market among the first cases!

Again, there's no reason both theories can't be true here. The caged, dirty animals definitely seemed to be the virus' first stronghold, but that doesn't mean that the new bat virus couldn't have come from the New Bat Virus Laboratory 20 minutes away from the wet market.

> Picking and choosing one data point to be skeptical of is useless, the totality of the evidence needs to be weighed.

My point is that it made the bias of the author nakedly apparent. It's an pro-wet-market argument piece, not an objective look.
How does one get the kind of connections to even raise a seed round? I'm in the Midwest, and unless I'm doing AgTech or something B2B no one wants to talk to me. I have a B2C SaaS product that could take off like a rocketship if I had more resources to dedicate to it.
Videogames are oddly the most secure of all.

I don't know why (maybe criminals are more likely to go for your WoW account assuming the legal consequences are less) but I would advise all companies to examine how Blizzard, Valve, and others handle account security.
Day trading crypto is fine, but honest long best show low IQ!
> The fact is…

Perhaps you mean — The analogy is…
Same-Sex Marriage and Contraception Should Be Next: Clarence Thomas
> There is no love and loyalty between employer and employee.

Where you are perhaps. But there are still pockets of civilization left on this planet.
> The NYC law spit in the face of a previous supreme court decision. That can't be allowed.

Yet what we recently learned is what the supreme court decides is of little consequence. It's just the temporary whim of whatever political party happens to be in power. In 10, 20 or whatever years it takes to get a liberal court back, then roe v wade comes back and the court reinterprets a "well regulated militia" to mean, ah, a "well regulated militia".
The existence of negative interest rates empirically disproves that there will always be scarcity.

After all, a zero percent interest rate implies the non scarcity of capital.
I agree to some extent, but there are far too many shitcoins out there and people think it's all a 'get rich quick scheme'. There's also lots of bad press about crypto scams, we have things like Terra and other stablecoins losing their peg, all these smart contract hacks etc.

Then we have all the whales and hedge funds manipulating the market, pump and dumps... it's really is the wild west out here still unfortunately. On top of all that, your parents probably think Crypto.com is the only place to buy it, and the more tech inclined may read 'not your keys, not your crypto', create a wallet and lose the keys or typo an address and lose the coins.

Plus we can't forget all the newer investors, over the past year or two. All of which are probably deep in the red right now and will sell at any opportunity when things look to start improving (and probably tell their mates to avoid it too).

I think the whole industry needs to take a step back, quietly work away for a few years, keep building things, improve security, increase trust. Drop all the DeFi farming pools with the ridiculous earn rates, stop the hype every time a new coin is launched. Get back to basics, create some real utility.

I'm not sure what the answer is on stablecoins or encouraging people to spend crypto. I think it's become too ingrained in peoples heads that crypto is an investment rather than a currency. Stablecoins were a partial answer to that, but they also kind of defeat the purpose too. We're back to trusting the US government, Tether and/or algorithmic stablecoins - which so far have proved to _not_ work. I believe it will take decades for people to stop tracking their crypto holdings and always converting it back to local currencies. Maybe we need some 'super' stable coin, that's backed by stocks, currencies (fiat and crypto) globally but not pegged to any one thing, kind of like an ETF? Is that possible algorithmically though and would governments ever legalise it and allow people to be paid in it?

I do think the tech that the crypto industry has created is great, and I do hold numerous cryptocurrencies (and am making a loss too...) but we're a long way off making prices recoveries, rebuilding trust and actually becoming useful in society.
Doubly ironically is that this was probably the single most effective action Morrison took to limit climate change emissions!
is that because physical paints can't be immediately copied like a sequence of bits can?
I think it started as a teenage rebellion sort of thing. Certainly the smoking did. Then later on the culture of the 60s-70s probably played into it. But then as the original comment talked about it definitely developed into a psychological dependency. Thankfully he's been happy done with all that for good for quite a while now. (Must be 15-20 years or so now.)

And thanks, I definitely got lucky kind of accidentally finding a viable business niche with searchtempest and then autotempest, and building on that. It's a fun way to earn a living for sure.
Hello sanity. The opinion explains this all in great detail. But few will read it - many will just get angry. Saying this as someone that would like abortion legal federally.
On the other hand, existence of this conspiracy has been used to shut down perfectly reasonable discussion around a less outlandish lab leak for months.

Even in this post opponents of the lab leak theory are still bringing up this bioweapons conspiracy - but I can't see a single lab leak proponent suggesting it's an engineered bioweapon.

The issue is the existence of this outlandish fringe theory was used to censor all reasonable discussion on the lab leak.
The country isn't divided on this. More than 70% of people support abortion rights - though some % of people are mixed about putting some restrictions on abortion. (Largely because the right has been successful at pushing bogus narratives around things like "partial birth abortions" which are exceedingly rare and usually a last resort for a pregnancy expected to go to term.)

Opinions aren't the problem here - rule by minority is the problem.
GL.net has some battery-powered travel router models which can run vanilla OpenWRT, https://store.gl-inet.com/collections/travel-ac-router
This crypto-themed restaurant didn't research a single thing, I wouldn't use it as validation or invalidation
I have to concede, a long series of rulings are a disgrace. In the long run of this institution, not sure on the ratio of questionable vs rightful vs plain calamities judges have come up with historically. I stand on my previous comment and as you say would agree to disagree: the supreme court system _still_ works, somehow. Institutions at large are in chamble in the West, we could make a special case here but no obvious dissonance that I can see or hear from these judges. On this ruling. Politically biased? Of course. Corrupt? Not quite, but indirectly, very likely.
Thanks for your thoughts. Agreed on them not being kept in check by Congress, not sure how the balance of power work in details, it would naturally more sense that congress gets at least some electing power and surely an avenue for dismissing
them for misconduct, by 2/3 of votes or whatever. That would sound more balanced than the whichever passing president given the election or some judges who then sit on their thrones for life.
Obvious?
I use the go version[1] implementation, for a bit easier installation.

[1]: https://github.com/psanford/wormhole-william
How to set up TailwindCSS using Webpack in a Django Project
Your choice of words tells me this will not be a productive conversation.
> no more than there is a point where a slowly accumulating pile of sand becomes a hill.

This is basically the argumentation why many treat conception as the start of life. If you can't know the exact point, then disallow people from guessing and potentially getting it wrong.
It’s a seed round.
> people should be able to reneg on the consequences of actions if those consequences are not desirable.

That's literally the entire basis of modern medical intervention, yes.
Thanks for the recommendation. Does the book also recommended low carb/keto?
> but it would take a lot of careful evaluation

This is what I was doing for a number of years.

> The most salient counterexample that comes to mind is modularity and namespacing.

Polymorphic variants and ocaml namespacing are nice, granted. These are the two ocaml features I've ever missed while using haskell. Minor details overall though. Namespacing is not as useful with typeclasses and PVs have typing problems.

> in my experience, OCamlers tend to not be very invested in arguing for the supremacy of OCaml

Yeah, this is mostly because it's not as much of a marginal improvement, so it doesn't have as many people interested in shilling it.
"I spent half my money on gambling, alcohol and wild women. The other half I wasted."
Wise! Thanks for posting this.
You need to try harder to find the greater fool.
Strange he left interracial marriage off the menu.
Thank you for providing and example of the kind of thing I was referring to in my GP comment.
> rule by minority

But the majority can vote for an actual law protecting abortion now, rather than relying on the previous rule by minority that was keeping it legal.
Elections have consequences. I have friends who are a same-sex-couple and militant female defenders. They vote straight R. Their heads have all but exploded.
the first man to ever build and sell a car, recounting his critics in the transportation industry: “There’s nothing the matter with me. It’s you! You’re crazy if you think this fool contraption you’ve been wasting your time on will ever displace the horse.”
"Staking" means locking your coins on a platform/chain for some period of time (like a year). So, Tera or Celsius offer 20% APY for locking your coins there for a year, then when everything tanks and they go bankrupt everyone who locked their coins there loses everything. It's a "junk bond" because the idea is that you only get paid at the end of the term, and at that point the bond is statistically unlikely to pay out.

Like most financial schemes, it really has nothing to do with the crypto, other than that it would be illegal to operate platforms like this with real money, since we created regulations decades ago to protect people from this.
The argument is that a state is denying the woman's liberty and/or denying them the privileges due to citizens on behalf of a party that is neither person nor citizen.

(Obviously the conferring the status of personhood on the unborn is a subject of debate).
For the brave among you, I actually can recommend reading some parts of it. His main ideas are quite interesting. I wasn't really able to follow, but nevertheless I was able to get something out of it. I find the idea and subject interesting, and I would really love to learn more about his expieriences, but it's very difficult to read because of all of his temperament.

I stopped reading when I noticed I started missing the actual descriptive information of his attempt to capture all of his thoughts. It is buried in a whole lot of strong opinions about details like what paper to use. At some point somewhere at the beginning he says he'll just spit the text out since it is better if he serves any readers with this than providing nothing. And actually that he spits this text out is kind of a perfect summary of how I feel when reading.

I wish he had been slighly more relaxed when writing this text. But I guess he practised his approach to get a complete map of his thoughts in a equally unrelaxed manner. In his defense, he says somewhere he is 25 (at the time of writing) and that is probably were some part of his energy comes from. I am not much older and multiple times while reading I asked myself whether - or to what extend - his text is a look in a mirror. And promised myself to take care to be less convinced of my own conclusions.
The 6809 had some hobbyist/consumer prominence on this side of the pond in the TRS-80 CoCo - and some European similars. And there was a multitasking OS written for it - OS-9.

OS-9 has an interesting history in its own right. It was ported to a wide range of subsequent architectures. All sorts of applications - Fairlight synths, Philips CD-i, most of the traffic lights in the US in the 80s and 90s to name a few.
In this context it's counter to the GP's posting that exercise is followed by feeling energetic and rejuvinated.

I do not want to feel sore or tired (I think "fatigued" might be a better word choice than "tired" here for what I was trying to communicate).

They are not pleasant sensations. They limit what other things I can do while experiencing them. Their presence is a negative reinforcement against exercising again. Plus I feel ripped off when so many others rave about how good exercise makes them feel while it just makes me feel crummy.
I believe the author means if you work at Apple or Google. So working ON iOS or Android, rather than working ON [top of] iOS or Android.
That's more on simply poor cell service if anything at all though no?

The tech even then seemingly worked for you then. Your anecdotal is comparable to saying students at a college not being able to add one another on Facebook in it's early days, because the campus Wi-Fi was on the fritz.
I agree with you. I was just trying to see it through the eyes of a young enthusiast
> if you find someone on your property who you didn't give prior permission to enter, you may murder them

I think the difference here is that there's no "a wild fetus appeared" but rather something intentional happened (intercourse of some kind). There's some level of acceptance/invitation here. If you invite someone into your house and they accept, that doesn't give you license to immediately kill them.

Granted, there are things like rape which need to be part of the equation.

I've said it a number of times in the comments but I will say it again: I think the original Roe vs Wade ruling had a great stance on the issue: once a fetus is old enough to survive, it receives personhood. I still think this is the most acceptable of all outcomes.

> I think a compromise where rights begin at viability makes enough sense. I would also be OK with allowing women to request a fetus be removed from their body even after it becomes viable, but not through procedures that are intended to kill it - for example, I could see an argument where a woman should be allowed to have an elective C-section to remove an 8 month fetus/baby from her body, who she could then abandon in the care of the hospital. But, I don't think it would be OK to request a procedure where an 8 month fetus is killed in utero and removed.

I think we see eye to eye here.

> For non-elective procedures (where the life of the mother is at stake) the discussion is more open-ended, I believe.

Right: which life is more important? Difficult questions, and survivability factors have to come into play here.

> Essentially, the right of the mother to her own body is quite obviously separate from the fetus' right to life. People who seek to conflate them are typically doing so with ulterior motives.

Separate rights with intersection at a point of conflict (assuming the fetus wants to live, which of course cannot be reasonably determined). I don't know if you're considering acknowledging of this conflict a "conflation" but if so, then I have to disagree.

> As someone else was pointing out, taking the extreme view of fetal personhood, while still correctly recognizing a woman's right to her own body, one should seek to (a) prevent any procedure that outright kills the foetus, (b) demand the mother carry the pregnancy until it is viable, (c) allow only late term "abortions" where the fetus is removed from the mother's body and kept alive on life support.

This seems to tip the scales in favor of fetal personhood over female bodily autonomy. I'm not a woman, but I think I would find it horribly painful to carry the child of someone who raped me and I'd likely want to get it out of me as soon as possible.

Are you saying this is a hypothetical position that anti-abortion people should support, assuming they were being logically consistent? If so, then yeah, that would seem to make sense.
My downloads folder is /tmp. If it's needed, I'll move the file to an appropriate location in Documents.
Move elsewhere.
No, it’s rather the raw power grab and blatant disregard for our institutions or common sense that is clear to most people.

This Supreme Court is blatantly corrupt.
Thomas appears to have a lot of conflicts of interest. Can we believe he's writing honestly?
If you can't use it to keep armed men authorized to use deadly force from putting you in a cage for the rest of your life it will at best be peripheral.

That's why people use the currency of their nation.

They must pay taxes and fees to exist as a part of society. Not doing so means you either fall off the social ladder or are imprisoned and have your life destroyed.

It's one thing that Modern Monetary Theory gets right. The government creates demand for its currency through taxes and fees that must be paid under threat of violence. So you work and earn the currency to pay for your right to exist.

Is that nice? No. But denying that the threat violence keeps this version of society together is denying reality. And trying to replace a system that is willing to use violence to maintain it's existence with dreams just doesn't work.
That's fair but doesn't help us find out what happened though.
Civil unrest is a market clearing mechanism.

When you think about that, there is no way declared to be free markets are actually free.
This is awesome!

My daughter and I stayed out on the trampoline one night and played a game to see who could see the first star. She won—and spotted Regulus. It was another one of those beautiful moments. Probably the stillest she's ever been for 15+ minutes...
Or we can just pass a law, instead of allowing judges to do so.

Remember that the supreme court has a somewhat checkered history. IT is the least of the democratic branches, but has unarguably limitless rights.

What is the supreme court decided that I had a in-numerated constitutional right to have slaves? Or a un-enumerated right to not have Japanese or Chinese in my state. These are not hypothetical.
That document shows how you can export private channels, but not private conversations. For example, if you and a friend have a DM conversation with each other, that is not exportable using that tool.