skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I mean me personally I won’t pay as much anymore when they enforce it, I pay it for my parents that live in another state and I only watch their large tent pole shows a couple times a year.

Rather than paying for the whole year I’ll pay for a month or two like I do with paramount+ and Disney+.

I’m sure they did some financial calculus to see what’s better but it’s not like other companies haven’t made terrible decisions in the past killing their business. I’m sure blockbuster had bean counters justifying their choices too.
I should be clear that I mostly favor the savagery with the caveats you mention, and look back on it with fondness. God made Econ brownbags to train the faithful.
"Yes, hello, I'd like to report the crime I've committed". Come on. That's the exact same reason why there are no openly gay people walking in the streets in Saudi Arabia. You don't report something that you did illegally.
Their stance is that abortion is killing babies. If that’s what you believe, it’s easier to get out of bed to stop baby murder than to help make child care more affordable.
Some argue the Supreme court has too much power. Whether you agree with the result or not, the Left absolutely abused the power of the Supreme Court in order to make fast progress. There was no reason to involve the Supreme Court in many of these cases in the first place other than because the laws themselves disagreed with what people wanted. But the people have the power to change the laws. We just havent.

which is also why 2nd amendment is relevant. if the people responsible for the creation of laws is sufficiently corrupted, then the public have the right to form a militia and replace them. Which you cannot do if those same corrupted people are the ones deciding who is allowed to have guns or not.
Because unlike democratically decided federal laws, state laws are unilaterally enacted by unelected dictators?
you're forgetting:
- what's the expected cost of leaving work for the trip and recovery (no sick days guaranteed available), and given they work in a state where the reason of their trip would be illegal
- what share of women in these states have free access to their finances / have their finances controlled by their partner

indeed this will mainly impact the poor and powerless
I think the Democrats have had that trifecta now and again. It's pretty great because they just mill around, argue a bunch, then collapse. I honestly don't get why Libertarians don't vote straight Democrat: it's a sure way to keep government out of peoples' lives due merely to their utter lack of discipline and cohesion.
A short, quick, deconstruction of BS arguments. I applaud your effort and efficiency.
I really loved Shenzhen I/O, it even got me into electronics. I started watching Ben Eater’s series on breadboard computers and built some similar devices to what I was making in the game around a 6502. It’s pretty cool that a game can trigger something like that.

The game had a leaderboard, and at one point an old programmer colleague reached out to me to ask if I was cheating - that’s something I’m still very proud of to this day!
Lots of things aren't in the constitution, which is the purpose of the 9th amendment. Surely bodily autonomy is something that falls within the spirit of what the founding fathers were aiming for. Benjamin Franklin certainly took no issues with abortion.
Cute take but I'm going to ask the question: why did something that was in place for 50 years needs to be revisited? Is it maybe needed for the nutjobs that do want to ban abortion to do their thing?

Also, you need to ask yourself: is this about abortion? Or is it really about literally keeping the people poor, stupid and uneducated?

Think about it: if you're not poor this is not an issue. If you have 5 kids instead of 1, good luck getting them the proper education. But it's cool...we can use all that almost free labor to drive our corporate empires forward.
When I'd do distance running training, anywhere from 30-50 miles a week, my appetite didn't necessarily increase/ decrease.

When I switched over to cycling, anywhere from 150-250 miles a week, my appetite went through the roof, and I just inhale food constantly.

As an aside, I found my tastebuds get extremely, extremely sensitive right after a spirited bike ride. Sometimes things I thought that tasted pretty good suddenly had certain flavor profiles ultra amplified and overpowering. Other times, food & drink that tasted weird would become absolutely delicious. But even an hour later, after satiating the post-bike-ride appetite, that very same food or drink could taste significantly different. Like Sierra Nevada's Hazy Little Thing IPA, man, it can taste like 2 vastly different beers. Doesn't make me wanna become a foodie per se but it does make me think that my body craves and rewards me for eating after a spirited ride.
You can't vote them out. There are only two ways to get rid of a Supreme Court judge: they retire or they die.

As I assume you aren't asking for ways to bring about either of those scenarios in ways that would incur legal issues, the more appropriate answer is that the government can appoint additional judges, which I think is called "packing". Right now the general consensus among Democrats seems to be that they don't want to do it because it would set a precedent Republicans could exploit, although history has shown that the Republicans don't require precedents to "play dirty" (e.g. while Obama refused to appoint a replacement judge because he was on his way out of his second term, Republicans happily appointed replacement judges when Trump was on his way out, not to mention that a significant number of Republicans supported the claim that Biden "stole the election" and Trump was the real winner).

If you're asking for a systemic long-term solution: no, it can't be fixed. The problem is that the Supreme Court lacks a clear mission statement and effectively acts to reinforce whichever party is in power at the time. The current SCOTUS majority leading to these decisions are "constitutional originalists". While you can argue that this is bad (or that this is still relying on interpretation and inferrences), it's impossible to say that this is wrong because it's an entirely valid interpretation of what the SCOTUS is for.

If you want to "fix" the SCOTUS because it's undemocratic, the problem is that it's only one of many aspects of the structure of US government that's undemocratic. The system was never meant to allow all people to equally influence the government. The system exists as much to curtail the power of the ruling politicians as to curtail the direct power of the people.

In other words SCOTUS isn't broken, you just don't like the political system itself. That's fine, but it requires a different framing in order to understand your goals and options.
So if we had artificial womb technology, should a woman have the choice to terminate the fetus if the fetus could be safely moved to an artificial womb? If so, doesn't that go beyond the scope of your post of abortion being purely about bodily autonomy? If not, whose responsibly is it to raise the child?
The current record of a baby surviving is around 20-21 weeks.

The viability condition is one of the legal arguments people tend to attack. Justice Blackmun even wrote in a memo when drafting the verdict for Roe vs Wade: "You will observe that I have concluded that the end of the first trimester is critical. This is arbitrary, but perhaps any other selected point, such as quickening or viability, is equally arbitrary."

They did end upon a viability criteria. The exact week has also changed since medical science has advanced in the last 50 years.
"How dismal it is to see present day Americans yearning for the very orthodoxy that their country was founded to escape."

Christopher Hitchens
Pro-choice is the clear majority. There's no argument of "it depends on how you cut it". It's natural for people to disagree within a movement but 69% of Americans oppose Roe V. Wade being overturned.
I think its the addictive nature of cardio. Like I definitely feel like I need to get out there and get my heart going. Takes restraint to rest when I know I need it.

I wonder if we could just induce a little healthy endorphin addiction is less fit people to prime them? Haha
Really suggest not doing this with -6 sph or stronger. The higher your prescription the greater the risk of halos and starbursts.

I was at -9 and -8.25 (OS OD) with slight astigmatism (0.25 cyl) and still have halos 8 years later. Mind you this was at the absolute edge of what the machine at the facility I worked at could do. I no longer work for that company and I understood the risks going into the procedure with my prescription.

I did require glasses after 2 years too and due to the aspherical nature of my, now ablated, cornea any spherical abberation is perceived as astigmatism. I have to over correct a quarter diopter in sph to reduce the halos and starbursts at the expense of a bit of fish eye lensing.

Would I do it again? Probably but I would definitely try glasses sooner to help with the haloing even if I tested at 20/20.
What is the over under on the number of hours before the "fiery but mostly peaceful" riots begin?
I fail to see what moderates can do in a two party system where gerrymandering is so heavily done that often Democrats have to win 3-1 to control any majority. At this point I see it as a fight between rich landowners+business owners+religion vs all the rest of the people . For a country where political lobbying and donations to effect legal decisions is common , I do not expect judgements to ever be fair.
The battle between union and state rights only muddies the waters for legal speak.
>This is because having a reliable food supply everywhere is not the same thing as growing enough food, on the aggregate, to be able to feed everyone.

It's more that the people who cant get enough food dont have anything that the people who have an excess of it really want.

Global wealth distribution is more the issue than logistics and that wealth includes legal monopolies on all the worlds most arable lands intrinsically backed by the threat of violence.
A Partial Review of the Jellyfin Suite of Multimedia Applications
Perhaps those are start-ups that we don't need in the EU.
And now we're playing the game of polls, where depending on what additional information you provide, people respond differently. The general point of "people will respond differently if you ask about abortion in general vs third (or second) trimester abortions in particular" remains.

I'm sure your overall polls would change if you said it meant that a nearly-due baby could be aborted at will, too.
Roe V. Wade has decades of precedent. Even if the ruling was "horribly decided," this is not a good look for the legitimacy of the court.

Especially at a time when the country is more polarized than ever. This is just horribly timed and will further split this country apart. This will be our century's dredd scott - the court "thought" this would settle the issue. But it won't:

"Although Taney and several other justices hoped the decision would permanently settle the slavery controversy, which was increasingly dividing the American public, the decision's effect was the opposite."
Don’t outsource your happiness or success to other people’s decisions
Isn't this essentially what CPS does today? The difference being that it's reactive instead of being proactive.
Religion is the ruler's favorite tool

This is seen very Authoritative Governments and Dictatorships because it allows for the exploit of self-identity. People often create their self-identity around a religion and if you try to talk about any logical flaws with their statements or show them whole evident of facts proving them wrong they will still stick with their religion because they then would destroy their self-identity. When religion becomes self-identity then the person stops living reality and in a religious dream-like state.

Look at Benjamin Franklin, US Founding Father, was a Christian but didn't self-identity and also wrote a section in a book, Every Man His Own Doctor: The Poor Planter's Physician, how to perform an abortion.

He is an example of self-identity that goes beyond religion. But also the self-identity factor can also be tie not to religion but political parties or other extreme identities leading to group think.

With high confidence, and hopefully a good study is done, a high percentage of people that gave power to the anti-abortion / anti-liberty movements are self-identified with religion over other aspects.
I thought you said Canadian flag patch and I remembered back in the 80s hearing about friends traveling in Europe who would sew Canadian flag patches on their backpacks to hide the fact that they were from the US.
Telecoms lobby against this because they generate big revenues servicing SMS spammers whom end-users aren't able to effectively block since the ID is trivially spoofed.
This line of reasoning has to explain how we can regulate things like:

- Javelin missile launchers

- aerosolized bioagents

- jet fighters

- land mines

but not sniper rifles.

Again, if you're going to extrapolate what "arms" meant in the late 18th century, you have some choices:

- personal arms of the day (muskets, cannons, bayonets)

- personal arms of the current day (missile launchers [0])

- weirdo arms of the current day (drones, gases and bioagents, dirty bombs, white phosphorous)

Originalism isn't helpful to us here, it turns out.

[0]: https://www.militaryfactory.com/smallarms/rocket-launchers.p...
I like your framing of missionary versus a mercenary spirit.

What percentage do you get to keep out of the $55?

Or, perhaps a better question is, since you are running a two-sided marketplace, do you make money off of buyers (writers) or suppliers (editors) or both parties?
Related on HN this week:

> A lightning bolt would be worth only about a nickel

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31834627
I think many of them would argue self-defense is not the same thing as an abortion in most cases.
I had my personal information lost three times at one company when someone at HR decided to go out for drinks, left their laptop in their car and their laptop was stolen. THREE TIMES.

When I asked why our personal information was stored on a laptop I was told that I was being "unhelpful".

Thankfully not long after the company was acquired and they fired everyone who wasn't directly making products or customer facing or a direct manager of a customer facing or product development employee. It was a pretty stark layoff.

I later ran into the new CEO who was super personable and we were chatting and I asked about the acquisition. "We wanted the products, we wanted the support team and engineers, but we knew we didn't want any of the rest, they were not smart people." I liked that guy.
Wikipedia is arguably the most valuable website in existence.
Heavy SMS usage predates iMessage in the US. But iMessage was presumably a big contributor to making unlimited SMS messages the norm on most phone plans. In any case, there was just never a big incentive in the US to use anything other than iMessage when available and fall back to SMS otherwise. And without that incentive "no one" (who isn't texting people overseas) bothers to use different apps.
No - zero-knowledge Succinct Non-interactive ARgument of Knowledge (zk-SNARK) was first outlined in 2012[1] and the first real production implementation of it in the wild was Zcash (development of which started in 2013).

The ZK proof protocols being used today in blockchains are very different than those envisioned in the 80s. Specifically they are "non interactive" and "succinct" (proof is very short and easy to verify). Most of the massive leaps in development of ZK proof technology recently has been led by crypto currency space.

[1] https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2090236.2090263
> You won't have fetched your key properly, but the Mega client automatically re-fetches the key when that happens.

Is that something it could hypothetically do, or something that the current code does? In the latter case, is there any legitimate reason for doing that? And this would be detectable right, maybe not by a casual observer, but by a security researcher?
It is worth considering the larger shape of things.

Do you imagine, if the Republicans control all three branches of government, that they would not create a federal law that bans abortions everywhere?

All signals point to that, and the overturning of Roe vs. Wade is there to remove friction to get there.
My printer memories of the late 90's were of cheap Canon bubblejet printers. The ones that were cheaper to buy than replacement ink cartridges, to the point that it was cheaper to buy a new printer than it was to replace the ink. Good times.
This is pretty much why Chrome is perceived as the best product, to the point of being identical to the standard. It's only when you turn away from Chrome as the principal development platform and develop for other browsers first and then checking on Chrome, because, what works on WebKit should work on Chrome, as well, that you start to see its many shortcomings.

E.g., did you know that Chrome doesn't manage to render preformatted mono-space text at a uniform character width, 30 years after the introduction of the "pre" tag, in its +100 iteration? (E.g., Greek characters in formulas. So, where is the problem, there's MathML, a standard since the 1990s and part of HTML5. Oh… So let's add training wheels for Chrome, making each character a span of its own and fixing it in CSS… – To be fair, MathML doesn't enjoy a decent implementation in any browser, but with regard to implementing standards… Or take the implementation of certain UI elements like range inputs: let's make a slider from -100 to +100 preset to 0 in the center. Now +2, a discrete value, is rendered as an accent-colored range of 103 units, which somehow is supposed to make sense, and users become subtly shamed into picking higher values by the means of a more or less colorful experience. No option to disable this utter nonsense and Mozilla even followed on this path, because Chrome is the standard. As a result, if you need a basic, non-biased input, you have to come up with a non-standard implementation of your own, probably involving all kinds of accessibility issues.)
When FDR threatened to pack the court when his New Deal legislation kept being struck down since it violated federalism. “the switch in time that saved nine.”
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/when-franklin-rooseve...

"Most of the federal government’s authority over the economy derived from a clause in the Constitution empowering Congress to regulate interstate commerce, but the court construed the clause so narrowly that in another case that next spring, it ruled that not even so vast an industry as coal mining fell within the commerce power."

The "regulation of interstate commerce" now is a joke of a catchall which basically is modernly interpreted as "government can damn do what it pleases in every avenue of our lives" from its original interpretation which was "you can make sure horses can get from point A to point B".
I think research has shown the opposite. Low-intensity cardio makes people more hungry, in general. Personally, after a long hike, I have a voracious appetite.
Linus Torvalds: Rust is coming to the Linux kernel 'real soon'
Cultural path dependence? Rural voters in places like Vermont are maybe not so different in moral stance from urban voters.
In 2021, I used cash at a bar, and the girl behind me said “ew look! He is paying like a poor person!”. I was shocked.

Censorship can be overt, covert, societal or authoritarian.
It's generally a costly effort best avoided in the absence of clear personal gain. Also, I live in one of the more backward parts to the US, where people are openly celebrating the fact that women's ownership over their own bodies is once against subject to majority votes in state legislatures.

If you've ever voted Republican, I fucking despise you. You are authoritarian filth and traitors to this country and the libertarian ideals on which it was founded.
I don't have an answer for you at the moment, but a number of my US SW engineer friends have moved to Berlin on some sort of work visa.

A couple have been there for years, at this point.
ah, "mainstreamed" means not using ASL as your primary language (or at all, sounds like?), got it.

I have seen folks make a related distinction: born deaf or lost hearing.

Then there are some categories which are defined by physiology: some folks can't receive any benefit from cochlear implants because the biological hardware isn't there to interface with.

This just blows my mind: There are folks who fall into the subset of a subset of a subset and thus are so different from me that it's hard to imagine what it is like to be them, and yet, through ASL for example, or games, or so many things, it becomes apparent that they are just like me--and again, not at all. Minds are neat.
Some states are pretty big, and have diverse populations- maybe we should make it the choice of the county! Then again, some counties are pretty big, maybe we should make it the choice of the city or town! Then again, some cities are pretty big, maybe we should make it the choice of the block! Then again, there might be a lot of differing opinions even on a single block, maybe we should make it a choice of the individual!
I would think it’s a function of the job offer, seniority and the “help” of the hiring company. That, plus the passage of time. The more senior the candidate is (and can prove), the more varied the visa possibilities are. Each country has various visa description pages on line somewhere and there might be eu level stuff as well (never looked). But it’s non trivial unless there’s a real skill match as, technically, they might have to guarantee there’s no natives who can do the work.

Check whether there are specific country-level agreements like nafta between us/Canada and Mexico. This changes the rules for the appropriate countries’s citizens. Canada/us is quite straightforward to cross if a job offer is in hand and one of a fair number of career categories is met.
walking is exercise. it’s considered a fine thing to do for “conditioning” in a weight lifting program
Before anyone writes a eulogy based on the headline, note the following:

So it’s sad, but also awesome in its own way, that 2022 will see the end of Zachtronics. Not because their publisher shuttered them, or because their venture capital funding ran out, or because Activision made them work on Call of Duty, or any other number of reasons (bankruptcy! scandal!) game developers usually close their doors.

No, Zachtronics is closing because...they want to.

“We’re wrapping things up!” Barth tells me, way more enthusiastically than you would normally expect under these circumstances. “Zachtronics will release Last Call BBS next month. We’re also working on a long-awaited solitaire collection that we’re hoping to have out by the end of the year. After that, the team will disband. We all have different ideas, interests, tolerances for risk, and so on, so we’re still figuring out what we want to do next.”

I play games too infrequently to invest the necessary bandwidth into a Zachtronic game, but I read some of ZACH-LIKE and always respected the philosophy. As long as no one is getting the rug pulled, this sounds like an awesome way to go and an awesome thing for the gaming industry. Hopefully this means more smart indie gems in the future.
And yet, they made it the very first amendment, so any state with their own religion should have had it struck down quickly. Also, the term "separation of church and state" did in fact start with the founders. Who were mostly deists, not at all like today's Evangelical Christians.
YouTube is a site where people create their own channel, and YouTube moderation is done by people paid by YouTube and bots.
Only District of Columbia v. Heller decided that the right to bear arms was independent of an official militia. No doubt such ruling could eventually be overturned by SCOTUS if they so choose.