skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
maybe contributors will move on to other operating systems then, like BSD?
But what if my answers don’t contain any copyright material but all of my expertise in a given subject comes from having learned copyright material and then practised it so that it is firm in my memory and understanding to the extent that I can produce the required solution?
> EU should dissolve itself and be rebuilt from the ground up, with one referendum this time, not two

Why should the replacement union by any better than the existing one?
Ask HN: Where do you search for jobs?
When do you search for a job you do it in only one job boards or multiple?

Would be useful to have a list of job boards and that you could filter them based on your skills?
I'm a magician and a developer by training.

Now primarily employed in a marketing capacity.

Over my career I've worked with:
- Doctors
- Lawyers
- Engineers
- Fund managers
- Academics (hard and soft sciences)
- Mentalists/Hypnotists

All of them believed that they're specific training and temperament made them immune from simple persuasion techniques and that they were purely rational actors.

None of them struck me as any more rational/more independent thinkers than anyone else off the street
Supreme Court ruling expands US gun rights
That's mine! Feel free to drop a line if you need anything.
WorkOS founder here.

Our pricing scales to be competitive with Okta even at higher volumes. The difference is ours is transparent and predictable, whereas Okta/Auth0's is opaque and requires you to negotiate with a sales rep every year. (Not a great experience...)
That may be the official definition of gentrification, but in practice, you will be called a gentrifier if you move to a predominantly black neighborhood and have the same wealth as all of your black neighbors but are white instead of black.
Neither Clang nor GCC has perfect bounds or lifetime analysis, since the language semantics forbid it: it's perfectly legal at compile time to address at some offset into a supplied pointer, because the compiler has no way of knowing that the memory there isn't owned and initialized.

Sanitizers are great; I love sanitizers. But you can't run them in production without a significant performance hit, and that's where they're needed most. I don't believe this post blows that problem out of proportion, and is correct in noting that we can solve it without runtime instrumentation and overhead.
It gets brought up in posts about weed because the posts, like this one, are about weed. Similar things are stated about other things in posts about those other things. Do you believe discussion of the relative pros and cons of weed use should be forbidden?
College kids will take 10 shots in a row of everclear on a dare then die. Same goes for drugs though. What is it about college kids and dares that get them killed? Like “I dare you to kill yourself!”, “ok, watch me!”.
I don't know any, but I know a whole lot of dope-heads who completely destroyed their lives with daily use of cannabis.
You know instead of defending a toxic chemical on a message board you can just quit, right?

The only dog I have in this fight is what you have graciously pointed out — that the “very obviously best choice” is to quit nicotine altogether.

Kowtowing to nicotine pundits about health benefits of a toxic chemical ends with generations of adults slaves to said chemical, early deaths and ruined lives. I don’t do it and you shouldn’t either.
The amount of drama people make is incredibly.

Its more accurate to say that SpaceX (and every other sat company) slightly disrupts a few telescopes. Talking about "blocking out" astronomers is just hilarious claim.
I would recommend Chris Rackauckas' response in the original thread.
Yeah exactly. Like a lazy night isn't the worst thing in the world... it isn't even all that bad. It's not like you're breaking into cars for meth money or drunkenly assaulting people. But still, do you really want every night of your life to be vape pen, Netflix, order pizza?

I don't really know the best way to kick the habit or to reduce it. It seems like different things work for different people. Maybe it would help to pick one week to go no-cannabis and see if you can do it. Good luck with whatever strategy you decide to go with....
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution at One Year
>I would also quibble with the term “stabilize” as “stable as a single worker in a self owned business” != “stable as a worker in a multi person company”

More stable than those kinds of people would be if they got a McJob somewhere that treated them like just another disposable body.
I know this wasn't your intention, but this is the most compelling argument to try it that I've ever heard.
These are also the elements that make a good hypnosis subject.

I can't put a dumb person under.

I need someone with an active imagination who wants to work with me (for best results)
honestly sounds like you're having a great time lol
But let's keep the disposable flavored e-cigarettes from China...
> Which car? The one I don't have because I'm saving to buy two next year?

So eventually you'll have two ... and what will happen? Yes, some time your car will need repairs. Will you have the repair done months later because it'd be cheaper then? Highly unlikely.

> If you're saying that drastically reducing or eliminating the purchase of everything that is not absolutely essential to have won't be bad for the economy, or if it is, it won't be bad for society in the long term -- then say that.

I think people would - as they always have been doing it - still spend money on things that aren't absolutely necessary. If not for mere hedonistic pleasure then for status or whatever.

>>> If know I can use the same money to buy two cars next year instead of buying a car this year, I will not buy a car this year.

>>You sure?

>Yes. (I lived someplace where there was a ridiculous price markup for electronic goods. I needed a new phone and laptop but I refused to buy them because of the ridiculous prices. Then the currency crashed a year later and I immediately bought them by exchanging US dollars before they could markup the prices or pause sales. I ended up getting them for less than the US price incidentally. Otherwise I would have waited until the old ones were preventing me from doing essential tasks. This is same for cars.)

You ignored what I read about the buying power doubling over not one year but rather fourteen years ... you're writing about "currency crashing" which is something completely different from a gradual steady deflationary currency.

> "People consume because there's a limitless desire to consume" he says. And when Fridman calls him on it, he says yes well people economize due to constraints no matter what.

What's the point? Of course people try to find a balance between spending now and saving, nothing new here.

> If a transition from fiat to bitcoin standard starts happening, this is the path its going to take until the price stabilizes, no? People doubled their money in half a year in 2021 after all.

Yes. But as with most such developments, there's the dynamics that you see at first glance (adoption grows --> people are more confident Bitcoin will become even more valuable --> demand increases --> price increases --> ...) and there's lots more secondary dynamics that will also happen and dampen the obvious dynamic (price increases --> too expensive for some --> demand decreases --> dynamic equilibrium). There's surely more such secondary dynamics and they're important.

> EDIT: his odd comment that he is migrating from anarchism towards supporting benign dictatorships doesn't exact endear him either.

Well, I'm not a fan of dictatorships.

I don't think it's a very useful heuristic to discard all ideas of some person because one doesn't share/like one or a few of their positions.
You'd have to discard the positions of almost every person on the planet then, right?
I've been writing a toy `wordcount` recently, and it seems like if I wanted to support inputs much larger than the ~5GB file I'm testing against, or inputs that contain a lot more unique strings per input file size, I would need to realloc, but I would not need to free.
Lua would be good. Device drivers need not be all about high performance especially for initial development. Lua would be fast enough for plenty of purposes.
The question they asekd is at the bottom of the table. Most loved is definited as (people who want to keep using the language) / (people who have used the language in the past year). Dreaded is 1-loved.
Say, I want to write a getter method like below:

String getName() {
return name;
}

Let us also assume that this snippet, unsurprisingly, has been in several copyrighted repos that didn't grant Github the right to share this code.

So I start tying "getName" and copilot suggests the exact snippet above. If I use this snippet, is it plagiarism? Even though the above code is the most "obvious" way to write this getter and I would have written it this way even without copilot's suggestion? Or does the "uniqueness" or "non-trivial quantity" of the suggestions have any bearing in determining copyright violation? How/where do we draw the line?
> Recently I put together a simple build rule that strips external dependencies, archives the rest, and uploads it to a cache. Then we can easily run that archive against a pre-built container (which contains the external dependencies) in our cluster, enabling a very fast ML iteration loop on beefy cluster machines.

Can you tell us more about this? We're using bazel at $day_job and it's about as pleasant as gouging my eyes out with a rusty spoon. Building docker images using bazel takes forever.
Walmart Amps Up Cloud Capabilities, Reducing Reliance on Tech Giants
From what I've seen, using these huge models for inference at any kind of scale is expensive enough that it's difficult to find a business case that justifies the compute cost.
Archive: https://archive.ph/afJye
Agree for the lawmaking part, though the free trade agreement is great and should be expanded.
The office vs wfh decision is one of no winners and no good compromise.

Previously office was the default and it was a bad fit for many but had some good points. Now wfh is the default and while I think it’s overall an improvement, it’s still a bad fit for many although perhaps not as many as office default. But it is still early days so nothing can be said conclusively, long term may be more nuanced.

But what seems impossible is a set up that actually works for both the office types and the wfh types. Hybrid has not been worked out. Going into a deserted office for zoom is not a solution.
That’s a lot of text to try and convince me that the most addictive substance on earth is anything but awful for society as a whole.

Edit: Removing some snark, you’re arguing for some therapeutic benefit to nicotine.

So surely you’d be for a blanket ban on the sale of all nicotine products with the exception of a highly regulated prescription market and subsequent labeling of nicotine as a controlled substance, right?
I can relate to this. My solution was smoke if and ONLY if I have already made dinner. Friday and Saturday night are the sole exceptions.
When I was a teen, most alcohol/cannabis I consumed was at some social gathering and was procured by someone else. Granted that was a long time ago, but I assume that hasn't changed.
My impression of bazel has been the same. It makes working with polyglot tech stack a breeze.

Do you have an example of the rule that strips and archives your dependencies? Or an example of being able to invoke the python interpreter in a bazel context? I haven't seen anything like that, and want to try it out in my own project.
Perhaps we might get a clue if we look up which country currently has the highest incarceration rate?
This might be overreacting but is there a way to opt-out of Copilot using your code in open source repos?

It feels morally wrong to me that I can spend thousands of hours working on projects on my own free will but then a company can sell the code I wrote to others in the form of snippet completion as a service. In fact they end up selling your code back to yourself if you plan to use the service.

If the answer is no, that moves the needle pretty far in the direction where I'd at least consider the idea of moving all of my repos to Gitlab. I don't care much about stars or popularity. I open source things that are interesting and useful to me and if other folks want to use it they can but I don't gain motivation from others using the projects I release. I like Github and its UI and it's no doubt "the spot" for open source but selling code written by others rubs me the wrong way a lot. It stinks because it also means no longer contributing to other code bases too. It's moving us in the opposite direction of what open source is about.
Yep, but since I got a few health conditions I can no longer tell which one is the cause.

Guess I'll keep going to doctors like I do lately.

But I did hear from a few trainers and doctors that melatonin can be taken without prescription and is not dangerous, hence my question above.

I'll ask my doctor next time about it.
That is the most bullshit thing I heard today. The EU is an achievement that has given Europeans an incredible amount of freedom, not least the freedom of open borders. It needs to be reformed and modernized so that future generations can enjoy the same (or even more) freedoms as we do. I hope you are aware of the cynicism of speaking of tyranny in light of what is going on in Ukraine and Russia.
try the following R code:

fisher.test(matrix(c(786, 298, 22999, 11156), nrow = 2))

#> Fisher's Exact Test for Count Data

#>

#>data: matrix(c(786, 298, 22999, 11156), nrow = 2)

#>p-value = 0.0003266

#>alternative hypothesis: true odds ratio is not equal to 1

#>95 percent confidence interval:

#> 1.116046 1.469612

#>sample estimates:

#>odds ratio

#> 1.279435
Are thousands of amazon employees going to be in same docket with me?
Tensorflow, Pytorch, and JAX are all amazing for differentiable tensor expressions in Python. Where Julia shines is differentiable programming over more complex models, e.g. differentiable programming over state of the art differential equation solvers. The Python ecosystem is a desert in comparison (the sophistication of the differential equation solvers in python is fairly low and difficult stiff problems are not easy to solve there).
Enlighten us with the facts if that’s the case!
Right, but other implementations are missing a lot of key libraries which rely on the CPython->C bridge.
If you are in good condition and wearing light clothes, sunscreen, and drinking plenty of water, hot weather is not a problem for bicyclists. Admittedly it takes a bit of work to get there, though, and most people are not willing to put in the work.
Indeed, a reasonable concept of "limited government" has to extend to limiting individuals whose power approaches the power of a government.
> I don't see how game design can easily shift this balance

several options, tweak values to taste:

- Give defending players a boost/advantage against attackers until the winnable spoils are too lame to be worth the effort.

- Let there be a magical force which returns 90% (x%) of a loser's stuff to their magic box. Therefore the winnable spoils are too lame to be worth the effort.

- Allow "titling" of real estate and expensive personal possessions. Upon death, the title would be transferred by pre-set rules to someone specific, or in estate court to next-of-kin (respawned player). NPC Shops call the guards if they see mis-titled sales. Guards do random searches at the city gates and confiscate mistitled items. Those are then eventually returned to the next-of-kin/etc.

- Provide an option for mutual "yes lets fight!" where no taxes/boosts/etc are applied and winner takes all/most. (maybe they could agree on custom % of spoils too).
I fall asleep with triggers; for me they are mp3s of comedy tv shows. It needs to be something that I know through and through. I sleep with one earbud in and pass out when max a few minutes into an episode. It stays on when I wake up I sleep again (usually don’t even notice that I woke up; sometimes my wife says I did). I am also a lucid dreamer, I can usually get back to the dream I was already in or stop my dream to get into another one. Although I might dream all of that; I do remember a lot of detail in the morning.
(Not a European, so appropriate caveats apply.)

> I am an EU nerd. As a young civil servant, I was involved in negotiating the Amsterdam, Nice, and Lisbon treaties. I have always been fascinated by enlargement and institutional reform. I am an advocate of both widening and deepening. I wrote my PhD on flexible integration

If some ordinary citizens of Italy, Poland, Spain, etc. were calling out for "widening and deepening" I might be more impressed. Especially if the citizens of the UK hadn't explicitly voted to leave.

>This time, there is no choice. Indecision will lead to frustration and instability. There is no space for petty, low-level tinkering or domestic politics.

Democracy... it's SO messy.
My mind is blown. Thanks for sharing. Especially with the movie analogy. I’m a very movie person and I imitate my personality traits a lot based on characters on movies…
Considering the number of food-delivery cars constantly double parked along the restaurant-dense streets of my area, the restaurants would probably lose a fair bit of business if cars couldn't access them.
Users of weed do more to keep it illegal by their off-putting rhetoric than any Refer Madness propaganda does. I've been in favor of legalization for decades but really dislike discussing it with users because of their often lack of self-awareness and tendency to be just as dishonest as those against it.
from my limited understanding bpf is not general propose by design, like disallowing infinite loops etc. otherwise people have been designing competent bytecode/vm since 90's.

wasm kernel extension does sounds nice, especially after the meltdown and spectre.
I use DEVONthink to keep a local copy (WebArchive) of interesting pages. On top of obvious bookmarking features like tags I get good search, annotations, and preservation to name a few things. Preservation is underrated. I have quite a few pages that are no longer available on the web (even in various archives).
> So I'm not covering tools like AddressSanitizer that are intended for testing and are not recommended for production use.

How is it an exaggeration when he explicitly called this out?
Can you explain why, in spite of the fact that (according to you) C & C++ aren't that unsafe, critical projects like Chromium can't get this right? https://twitter.com/pcwalton/status/1539112080590217217

Is the Project Zero team just too lazy to remind Chromium to use sanitizers?
If 11,156 dreaded Python, but only 298 dreaded Julia, doesn't that make Julia look a whole lot better?
The 3 most-equally-divided languages are

1. Ruby (49.99% love)
2. Scala (50.3% love)
3. C++ (48.39% love)
Come in if you want, we'll offer relocation assistance. Simple.
In this case, "mystery" seems like a euphemism for "we don't especially like the most probably theory".
In what sense is the dichotomy between CPU and GPU contrived? Those are designed around fundamentally different use cases. For low power devices you can get CPU and GPU integrated into a single SOC.
Rust editions are nothing like C versions. They're orthogonal to language version. They're more like C trigraphs or -W flags.

All new Rust features are available from all Rust editions. The 2015 edition has got new features 3 weeks ago, and will get more again in 3 weeks.

Old Rust editions are only for backwards compatibility with old source code, e.g. to let it use names that became keywords later.
> If I remember correctly, when I was a consultant at Google for a while about ten years ago, they used Bazel.

Bazel is the open source version of Google's internal build tool, so you're correct.

> I live in the mountains so I start a long running build process and then go on a walk.

That's an awesome way to cope with long compiles! Maybe I should buy a slower computer...
Great. Are you an outlier or a typical user?
No need to be so rude, particularly when you are so completely wrong:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4861065/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29490885/
> post-fix await

For Scala devs this is the sane way :) (Or for anyone who likes RPN ^^) [Or for anyone who simply encountered a bit too many "(await (await x.y).z).w" expressions in other languages.]
>I don't believe Australia plans on going to Nuclear any time soon.

Yeah, so they'll use natural gas and coal as baseload.

>For those of you interested you can see a complete breakdown of our power generation here: https://opennem.org.au/energy/sa1/?range=1d&interval=30m

Expand the range to more than a day, and yeah, Gas+Imports(Coal?) is ~40%, so you're stuck on fossil fuels forever.

South Australia is also so small that it's almost pointless to use as a data point.
> I quite like Julia but every time I have tried to drop Python to use it I have had to go back to Python.

Is that because of library availability or something to do with the interpreter?
The thing with cannabis (with THC) is that it makes doing nothing OK so you may realize after some time of daily use that you have accepted doing nothing as a legit activity, contrarily when not high you'd either do something to utilize that time or may feel bad that you have nothing to do (bored). Cannabis has not much of physical addiction properties which is great yet one day you may find 10 years have got behind you and you have done not much. Perhaps no one told you to stop consuming it daily or you have just drifted upon losing the handles on your life.

If you want to be a daily user, or already are, do try to still feel the need to do something when there's nothing to do and consume it responsibly. You probably will be fine health-wise but remember that doing-nothing-is-ok is not ok especially when it's become routine.
Huh? EU citizen here. The EU got us a lot of stuff that is very good for its citizens:

- a common currency, eliminating the need to exchange currency - remember, Europe is a lot of small countries and you can drive six hours and pass eight different countries.

- a common border-control free zone ("Schengen agreement")

- a common, free-of-charge mobile phone roaming area

- common consumer protection laws in all areas of business, particularly data protection (GDPR), product safety (e.g. RoHS) and finance

- infrastructure development across Europe (e.g. constructing trans-European highway and rail network)

- a common economic market with the same standards for everyone

When comparing the EU to the US, I definitely prefer the EU, as dysfunctional as it can be sometimes (especially in foreign policy and military).
None of those are economists though. (I don't know whether they have econ degrees of some sorts but neither of them are practicing economists, both are pundits.)

I'm completely in favor of levying customs on China for anticompetitive practices. (Eg. favoring state-owned enterprises against other market participants.)

The point that the free trade zealots make - correctly IMHO - is that despite all the problems with the freeness of trade the trade part in itself got us so so so much prosperity.

> they are dominating naïve Western economies

Okay, that's a very vague claim. Dominating how? Their GDP growth is bigger? (Which is completely expected, it's much easier to catch up.) They stole a lot of tech? (Western companies knew all the risks when they entered into these partnerships, plus if they feel their IP is misused they can - and do - sue both inside and outside China, I guess with largely predictable outcomes.)