skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No, it's really, really not, and this line of reasoning is getting absurd.

People around the world routinely engage in frequent sexual intercourse without becoming pregnant. If you show me even a fraction of that same number of people who have demonstrated an ability to consume ten cheeseburgers a day for a prolonged period without gaining weight, maybe you'd have a point. Otherwise, this is just a blatant false equivalence.
There are many problems with this approach (I'm using it currently as well, out of necessity, not choice):

- SMS delivery is not always very reliable when roaming.

- Prepaid SIMs usually expire after a while of not topping them up.

- Good luck losing one of these SIMs and getting a replacement abroad. (eSIMs make this both better and worse.)
Nor does Postgres.
So, aren't you reinforcing his point, that the court is not a reliable place to make law? Today's decision is exactly that: the court acknowledging that its prior decision was an overstep in its power.
It's probably for the sake of an example, but writing a game/render loop with Sleep is a bad idea, perhaps even on a realtime OS. What you should be doing is to render the frame that's meant for the current time. This way slowdowns, hiccups, boosts don't alter the speed of animations, and you can regulate how frequent you render regardless of the timer precision.
That would be a fun conflation by a Chinese advocate.
2020 and 2021 were each at least five years long.
Yes, I felt very much the same after my first playthrough. I came back and was suddenly thinking through all these possible solutions to factory management only to realise it felt exactly like programming work and I should probably go and do that instead.
I suppose it's possible, but is it likely? Given the virality of Covid if it was present in another city before hand that city would have been the first to get a lot of cases.
Policy Governance[1] can really help with a lot of the weirdness described in this article.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Policy_Governance
Not very reliably, usually.
Originally, the ratio was one representative for ~30,000 people. When the number was capped at 435 in 1929, the number of constituents for a representative was ~ 210,000.

The current ratio is over 700,000.

One could easily make an argument for geographic representation of 30,000 people. Those people should have a lot in common and have similar concerns. You could also make a good argument for 100k-200k people. However, 500k+ people cannot be properly represented by one voice in congress.

If we had even the ratio of representation when the number was fixed (1:210,000), we'd have over 1500 members of Congress.

https://history.house.gov/Institution/Origins-Development/Pr...
This ruling has zero effect in my state where abortion is protected under the state constitution, and there’s near zero chance of a constitutional convention being formed in my lifetime, much less enough consensus being found at such a meeting.
Oh I'm definitely copying this idea!
> Democrats have had multiple chances to codify it and didn't even try. They could also get some buy-in from on-the-fence people and maybe even a few very centrist Republicans in bluish states with a compromise that codifies protection for abortions in the first trimester but nope.

When were these chances? I don't think there have ever been 60 pro-abortion votes in the Senate.
It's not nearly as vague as "there are reasons to believe" that the Court "might come for birth control next". Justice Thomas said it very very clearly in his opinion today:

"For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold [contraception], Lawrence [sodomy], and Obergefell [same sex marriage]. Because any substantive due process decision is “demonstrably erroneous,” we have a duty to “correct the error” established in those precedents."

They ARE COMING for it next. They just said so.
A lot of people are missing a very important core issue

What Alito and others did by over turning a previous supreme court ruling is open the bad box in that any time a majority changes on the supreme court there will be an attempt to over turn past rulings not based upon law but based on feelings of the court.

the only sliver lining is that there is growing evidence that at least 3 supreme court justice might be impeached by year-end.
the state can't use the evidence against you in court, can it?
Well said.

I wish I could have convinced more people to play TIS100. I will have to try some more.
Canadian roaming rates are so utterly shit the SIM card comes out the second I'm on the plane. It's like $15 per day to roam in the EU. Not per month, per day, let that sink in... I can get a plan in Europe for 30€ month that puts my Canadian plan ($90/month) to shame...

I'm not paying $450/month to roam...
Bad law for the reasons above.

Ie, onerous toward regular businesses
Ie, used to greatly expand bureaucracy and overhead
Ie, used by unelected bureaucrats to wage battles of personal vendetta against specific companies instead of doing what laws do, which is set unambiguous standards for all
> Other things the Supreme Court has blocked state law using the same logic as roe v Wade (due process of the 14th amendment[0]) on are blocking contraception bans (grisewald), overturning anti-sodomy laws (lawrence), and giving equal protection to gay marriage (obergafel).

Also, non-discrimination in public schooling, with mandatory integration (Brown) but even before integration was understood to be essential (Plessy, permitting “separate but equal” education.) Without substantive due process, state public education which is separate by race and makes no pretense of equality would be fine. Also, the incorporation of much of the Bill of Rights as applicable against the states, as a whole.

Substantive due process is enormous, and Thomas has explicitly stated that the entire jurisprudence in that domain should be uprooted in his concurrence on Dobbs.

(Ironically, this includes the applicability of the 2nd Amendment to the State.)
> Why isn't it a "science issue" because the pro-choice side is based on science?

What now? Has "science" become a nonsense word that only used to lend authority to nonscientific policy?

> The point I'm here to make is that the people who call it a religious issue are trying to claim legal protection that is undeserved.

That's not what's going on at all.

What's actually happening is something along the lines of "my religion says X is morally wrong, therefore I support making X illegal" (or more accurately "my religion teaches Y, which I understand makes X morally wrong, therefore I support making X illegal").
Guide to politics.

If you don’t support A. This means you are B,C,D…Z.
I'm not sure exactly why because I'm not from there, I've just seen the practice in a bunch of YouTube videos. I think historically houses there have always been very built very lightweight without exterior sheathing, and maybe it's just inertia that resists the increased cost that exterior sheathing would bring. They also build with 2x4 exterior stud walls and nearly all homes are single-storey slab-on-grade structures, whereas most of North America has moved to 2x6 exterior walls as standard (partly because it allows for more insulation) and multi-storey houses are common.

I don't know what to think about it, to be honest. Here in Canada I've started to see a lot of houses built with fibreboard sheathing with an integrated 1/2" or 3/4" outer foam insulation layer. The stuff is very flimsy and turns into oatmeal when it gets wet, but apparently it's sufficient. Builders use it because it's cheap and increases insulation and decreases thermal bridging, but I think I would prefer regular OSB sheathing with building paper, or Zip sheathing with taped seams if I could get it (I've never seen it used here before).
I have no insight into what is hard and what is easy to implement here, but might it be feasible to break up the error into parts, the first just as you wrote? Along the lines of:

1. Error: This expression has type ('x -> Result_set.t) list
but an expression was expected of type Result_set.t list

2. where 'x = (locl_ty * Tast.pos * ('ex, 'fb, 'en) Aast.expr_) list

The solution suggested by the parent of your post sounds desirable also, but perhaps the currying semantics of Ocaml makes that difficult or poorly-defined?
Historically no, unless you think only allowing landowners a vote is democracy
Acknowledged; you are as good as your word. Thanks.
Phones were here way before 2FA and Internet. The technology is poorly designed for modern attack vectors but it's so widespread it's crazy. Every single person out there has a phone number - one of the primary reasons it is still offered as a 2FA option.

Not to mention how widespread the coverage is. There are many places around the world where you have cell connectivity but no Internet.

In short, you can't get rid of it short of throwing away the SIM. Is it possible to have SMS v2 that's safer like we went from 2G to 5G?
Illinois passes 642-page law to make a 1-word change – accident vs. crash
No, it's not. The Court has "acknowledged" no such thing.

This court will use its power however it wants. It recognizes absolutely no concept about "overstepping". It will do what it wants. That has been made abundantly clear.
I think you misunderstood who the word "their" is referring to here.
Please don't quibble, it's not worth anyone's time, yours as much as anyone's.

I'd like you to explain the personhood and citizenry rights of the non-living. Regardless, from section 1 of the 14th amendment[1]:

> nor shall any state deprive any person of life,

Did you not think to check it first?

[1] https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxiv
Republicans have been floating a national ban on abortions; if the Republicans take the legislature in November, it is likely to be the first item on the agenda.

Roe v. Wade was the only thing preventing that.
Are Web apps competing with Android apps where users can use Blink-based browsers? I’m not so sure about that… I’d like to see some data points that’d prove otherwise though.
> And, no, critics of China are not automatically or even likely racist and xenophobic.

Especially since some people refuse to distinguish between people talking about the PRC and people talking about people of Chinese ethnicity. It's an obvious enough tactic once you're looking for it, but damn if it can't throw a smoke grenade into the discussion.
The City of New York is not a corporation, and is one of many municipalities that has forced public employees to take the experimental immunotherapy or be fired. For the record, I have taken the experimental immunotherapy, but that has no bearing on the fact that the government should never be allowed to force people to undergo medical procedures, much less experimental ones.
Maybe I'm missing something, but why would this work? Isn't it just 12 digits going to one phone number instead of 6? (also thinking about this is bringing me back to SYN-ACK from the old days)
POWERFUL TECHNOLOGY!
"It's not their fault" What? That brings exactly zero people the help they need.

When your action is the proximate cause of the revocation of freedom from 165m people, it's definitely 'your fault'."

This may not have been a great way to keep women safe forever, but today was not the day it needed fixing.
The only programmers that had issues with IE were when IE broke something they needed, it hardly matters what it was. Apples to apples comparisons are the relevant issue.

So if your PWA works on iOS/Safari, great for you, but it doesn't mean everyone's does.
Plan B blocks fertilization. It won't work if you're already pregnant.

Do you think women that have been raped and conceive children as a result should be responsible for raising those children?
That follows the spec:

> the sender SHOULD generate its field value as the best available approximation of the date and time of message generation

It's message generation date, not resource date.
They obviously won't. The Republican Party is explicitly opposed to expansion of the social safety net which would support the children from unwanted pregnancies. Outlawing abortion has nothing to do with protecting children. It's about exerting religious control over women and that's it.
Sorry to confuse you, I didn't mean that to be one room, and luxury brands by themselves aren't laughable - clothing with big luxury brand logo is.

The actually rich people are those who the wannabes want to emulate, that's why I feel it has relevance.
How can you ascribe motives if you don't even know the facts? Even if it was an accident, it would be gross negligence and worthy of intense investigation.
What I really want to know is "so what?" I mean, it would be great to learn about the origin and then take steps to reduce the chance of the same thing happening in the future.

But it appears most people just want to point the finger and that no change would result.

In fact one could imagine potential improvements for either case, some of which might be worth doing regardless of the actual origin.
Changing the scenario midway does not help anyone. Unless you are implying you agree with me, and wish to discuss a new scenario.

To me the lines are clear: You don't have to take action to save his life, but you also can not kill him by your actions. i.e. if everyone froze at this moment and did nothing - would he live, or die?
Constitution aside: the gangs and cartels will be licking their lips at the smuggling opportunities the second the gavel hits. You will hand them one of the biggest gifts since the war on drugs.
I went abroad from Canada for two years, tried to park two numbers to Virgin on cheap prepaid (still paying 5-10$ just to hold a number). Well they fucked up credit card payments on both accounts, closed them after a couple of months and stole our numbers. So aggravating to go through the trouble of parking the numbers, paying perhaps 300$ and then the aggravation of trying unsuccessfully to get those numbers back, and the aggravation of trying to figure out which services use those numbers for 2FA.

Canadian telcos are basically a scam (and Virgin is now my top hated one, assholes).

2FA using phone numbers is idiotic.
Heads up as we see more and more people in EU hired directly by US companies remotely.

Wages are steadily moving up in EU even if they are still lower than SV.

Though I think for US dev it would make more sense to move to lower cost state than to EU because I kind of imagine EU costs of living might still be higher than many places in US. Especially if one would move to NL/Germany/Belgium/France/Italy - if one would be moving to Romania/Poland/Hungary/Czechia could be also quite cheap but I don't think these are the countries typical US dev would have in mind :)
> And why do we give more voice to the rural vote? Sure they would be a minority otherwise, but so are left handed people and we don't give them more vote.

There are other minorities that we think a bit harder about than left handers. Consider, for example, that African Americans are approximately 12% of the US population.[1] They are not, however, evenly distributed around the United States. For example, they make up 33% of the population of Georgia and 22% in North Carolina,[2] states that crack the top 10 in US population.[3]

It took a bit of doing, but I weighted the electoral votes for all 50 states and DC (see [2]; you've got to issue your own queries to get them all) according to the percentage of African-American population (AAPC). For example, Alabama has nine electoral votes and an AAPC of 26.8%, which returns 2.412 adjusted votes.

In sum, African Americans account for 70.658 total electoral votes, about 13% of the total compared to their population representation of 12%. That step change is an 8% advantage relative to their total population (538*0.12 ~ 65 electoral votes; 1 - 65/71 ~ 8.45%).

This is not, I want to point out, an argument about racial inequality or the fitness of the electoral college to deliver solutions to those kinds of problems. Neither is it an exhaustive treatment (obviously) of every kind of demographic. There are obvious flaws in this approach (you can't split EC votes, EC votes are typically winner-take-all, not all of the population are voting age, etc., etc.). So it's also not intended to say, "Well, akshully..."

I do think, though, that there is some nuance that is missing here. Rural people aren't the only minority affected by the electoral college, and questions of geography and demography play important roles in how people vote. It's worth considering what happens when you are in the minority, because it is the rights of the minority that are most likely to be overrun by the majority.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_ethnicity_in_the_Unit...

[2]: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/GA,NC/PST045221

[3]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territ...
I will not go back to the office, unless I cannot find a dev job that pays six figures if I get fired, which is frankly unlikely. I don't need $300k.

I'm more productive at home anyway. I bet that most office workers could work 5-6 hours and complete their tasks faster than in the office.

I hate the office, I hate pretending to be interested in some bs stories, I hate commuting. I want to maximize my time offline to spend time with my family and pursue other interests. I just like programming and working with a team that has the same goal and can stay focused. I don't care if someone is talking to me from a couch, kitchen, library or a coffee shop.

I used to go to the office, and some people would come in for 6 hours and leave....and that didn't bother me either. If I'm not management I don't care if someone is doing 0 work, it is on management to measure performance.

I'm sure when my time is up, I won't be thinking "man I really wish I could spend more time commuting or sitting in a cubicle".
To be clear - the NIH never financed any GoF experiments in Wuhan. There was a proposal that was never funded, and even in that proposal, the GoF work would happen in Baric's North Carolina lab.
Every four years today's high schoolers graduate college and start earning money. They don't witness the previous cycle and it's lessons, so they are impressed by the tech and don't realize the greater fool is them.
Could you please at least do two minutes of research before coming in here with this take, using a brand-new burner junk account no less?

This is the most polled issue in American politics and has been for half a century. We know with certainty that a large majority of the public supports abortion rights. We don't need to talk about what "another majority could support". That theory has been shot down thousands of times over the last 50 years.
I think/hope any server running in cracked mode (online-mode set to false: https://minecraft.fandom.com/wiki/Server.properties) won't have this chat reporting. At least, it would surely be broken for anybody joining a cracked server with a cracked client. Maybe legit players on cracked servers could still be reported, if their client and the server both pass through the chat signatures.
I am still working on my never to be finished at this rate dream 4x-god-sim. The mindset to have with projects like that is entertainment. I enjoy the process. I could be reading sci fi or watching TV or tinkering in the shed or playing a sport or playing with a dog or raising children or whatever instead; those are also useless passtimes that are done for their own sake. I choose this one (among others), why not?

I also learned a lot of new tech from such useless projects in the past, but that is just a nice little extra, just like with the other ones
It's erroneous to use slavery and segregation as a template for any social issue you can frame as involving a "minority." It's especially ridiculous in the context of women, who are a majority.

Slavery and segregation were a sui generis issue because Black people are not only a minority, they are a discrete and insular minority. That is not true of gender and sexual orientation. Women and gay people are born into all families at predictable percentages. That drives social change as to those groups in a way that does not apply to a racial minority group.

The U.S. has a unique history with respect to slavery and segregation, but it does not with respect to women's rights or gay rights. Nearly every other developed country has left those issues to the democratic process. The European Court of Human Rights came to the exact opposite conclusion as Obergefell a year after that case, finding that the EU Convention on Human Right's marriage article did not apply to same-sex couples. Switzerland did not allow same-sex marriage nationwide until this year, and Italy still does not. Yet the EU continues to stand.
I bet Google 'knows' the date page first appeared in its index.
I think it would be great to address this as you describe, but at the same time as somebody who has dabbled in OCaml but is still very wet behind the ears, I don't understand how this error format requires the type system to be "burned into your mind".
Looks like it does that for any system with FileVault enabled: https://www.howtogeek.com/297611/how-to-set-up-a-guest-user-...
>Two clearly different situations, no?

No. You either have bodily autonomy (My body, my choice!) or you don't. For the record I happen to support abortion (and in fact think society would be better off if many of the people in Washington DC had been aborted), but I oppose hypocrisy and logical fallacies.
I have been one of those people. There must have been a lot of them because “export” is now an option which dumps all or selected keys and a giant non standard? QR code that can be imported into another instance. Mine are now on two devices.
Darn, and here I thought he solved massively distributed quantum entanglement based networking in a one sentence throw away line on an internet forum
The unfortunate fact is that the only plausible consequence of a public acceptance (by government officials) of the lab-leak hypothesis, is that funding for research into viruses would get a lot more restrictive. Maybe not less funding, but it would go to far fewer labs, which have the highest levels of containment.

The profession which knows enough to settle this question, thus has a massive conflict of interest. We cannot expect bankers to say that the response to the GFC should be to break up banks. We cannot expect generals after a war to say that they screwed up. We cannot expect intelligence agencies to say that they should have less power and more oversight. Scientists are human, they want to keep their job and not have to move to another city to do it.

What is actually going to happen, is nothing, until and unless a second lab leak kills a lot of people.
Yep. Ridley and Chan wrote their book when the lab leak idea was vaguely more plausible, but even then it really overstated the evidence. It's aged very poorly.
The Democrats were fine with mandating experimental COVID vaccines, but when it comes to abortion "bodily autonomy is a fundamental right". What a joke.
I write Elixir for work and I love most things about the language.

The pattern-matching would still be made better with static checks. It sucks to have a function blow up at runtime because of something as trivial as args being swapped or some code somewhere changing its return types. Someone brought up Gleam earlier, but god why with that syntax?

I'd still rather have dynamic checked pattern matching over the alternative.
> And yes, I do think that human life trumps over bodily autonomy.

So you'd be ok with government agents showing up at your door in the middle of the night and taking you involuntarily to the hospital to donate some of your organs to someone in the ER?