skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Also, is it not the case that most Americans support some abortion rights? Thus, this could force conservatives to move center on the abortion spectrum in order to appease their constituents.

One would hope, but they have only been veering further to the right on this issue. In the past year, multiple states have passed the most extreme abortion laws this country has seen over half a century. Texas will literally throw women in jail if they are caught leaving the state to get an abortion.

But those evil Democrats want to teach kids that there is nothing wrong with being gay, so I guess it equals out?

I do not know how any sane person can still support the GOP, especially after the Jan. 6 insurrection and this SC ruling.
The religious are in control because you can't win a republican primary without their support.
They are. The constitution explicitly stated that rights outside of those explicitly listed exist. The right to chose is one of those rights. There was nothing wrong with the ruling except that the supreme court majority personally disliked it
Sort of. I mean they were both made by Motorola and both had then #6800 in them...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korematsu_v._United_States
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Town_of_Castle_Rock_v._Gonzale...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buck_v._Bell
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott

What is legal != what is just, ethical, or moral.
Even in games composition is much better and what pretty much every engine forces you to use these days. It’s a lot more flexible too as you can compose a new boss out of ten different components rather than having to refactor a crazy tree of nonsense
3-1 is an exaggeration, but e.g. in Wisconsin 2018, Democrats won 54% of the popular vote and ended up with only 36% of the state assembly seats:

https://www.reddit.com/r/VoteBlue/comments/fwa7sa/regarding_...
A puzzling misinterpretation of the Asch ‘conformity’ study (1990) [pdf]
I wonder if passing NaN is considered "business logic"
Thinking of this interesting exchange long ago by an experienced c++ dev

https://old.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/78bowa/hey_this_is_ky...
Oh, they absolutely "get it." People quickly learn to dress for the occasion. When you go to a nephew's birthday party or something, you don't want to clue strangers in, so you take the Toyota and wear plain clothing. It's like a shibboleth, people who know what a $250 plain shirt looks like will get it, while everyone else is clueless.
The consequences of this are sickening, but it's also true that the question of abortion rights was never settled due in large part to Roe.

It's incredibly unfortunate that we'll now have this fight in an era where the Right is ascendant.

We've got 20 years of diminishing women's rights to look forward to.
I use it as well, the UI is a little cheesy and windows XPish (at least to my eyes). Maybe there is a technical limitation preventing it from inheriting the browser theme.

But so far, it's worked ok.
Our FOSS community uses it, and we're quite happy. We were on IRC before, maybe 20 users, and now we have hundreds of active users on Mattermost.

Our biggest struggle is with support within our community. Helping someone is nice, but odds are that someone else has the same question and losing their mind with Google. Mattermost does not provide a good way to archive topics. We push people to use our Gitlab or Stack Exchange for support, but both are hostile in their own way (not newbie-frienfly). Anyways, something there might do wonders. Maybe some kind of tool that lists popular threads on a public page?

Another wishlist would be to be able to hide or block people. While we do our best to be friendly, there are just some people that I get really annoyed when they PM me, and some others that I just don't want to see their comments in public channels (kind of like hidden tweets that you have to click to show them).
I think that could work in an environment where everything could be cleanly laid out and understood in advance, without room for error or confusion or misalignment. I think it is a lot easier to burn through misunderstandings with face to face or otherwise synchronous speech.

Detailed note taking is a good remedy for the whole "words only last as long as your throat cords vibrate" thing.

Although now that I think about it we're probably pretty close to agreeing, I'm really just pointing out the value of regular old talking as a good escape for when text based communications slow down or fail but implicitly I'm assuming a world where the default is text.. which is what it sounds like you'd prefer.
Semi-related question: The VO on that video pronounces "hover" as "huvver" - is this a normal thing in the US, or regional? I ask, because I must have heard podcast ads for hover.com maybe 50 times before I eventually realised that it was "hover", and even then that was only because I saw them mentioned on here.
You'll need to carve out a definition of "viable" that excludes late term fetuses that could survive outside the womb but includes born babies that cannot survive without the care of adults.
That reminds me.. someone I know very well managed to sleep past the only scheduled stop at a station near his home, and it was the last train for the night. But they helpfully made an unscheduled stop at the next station, just for him, which fortunately still wasn't too far away. Japan, of course. Trains in Japan are always on schedule, as in exactly on schedule, but they have margins to work with and could do that extra stop by just increasing the speed a bit afterwards.
If that's not from the majority opinion, how much does it actually matter?
Nobody disputes their ability to interpolate, I think (at least not me), but the problem is the starting points for these interpolations contains GPL licensed code, hence it derives GPL licensed code.

This derivation brings GPL in, and the model doesn't understand this. As a result, every time a GPL training data is mixed into the interpolation, you're converting the code GPL, or if you're not converting your code to GPL, you're violating GPL.

It's plain and simple.

On the other hand, I'm hearing "we'll write the specs, and computer will just auto-generate it" gospel since 2002. This time it won't be different. Human brain, intuition and creativity is beyond algorithmic modeling.

So, no, computer will not autogenerate the code from specs. It might link boilerplate together, which can be already done today.
The constitution is quite explicit that the rights it protects are not limited to those explicitly listed

I don't see what antivax has to do with anything
Playing Zelda Breath of the Wild atm and I sort of feel this way. I love riding around the map but I'm getting a bit... tired
The moral question in this case isn't "Should you be able to unplug the violinist?" but "Should the violinist unplug themselves?".

As an adult who is profiting from a crime committed against you, they are morally obligated to return you to your original state that existed before the crime was committed (even though it would return them to their original state, which was illness and near-term death).

For a child in the womb, though, they do not have a pre-existing state (under the philosophical premise that conception is the starting point of a unique human), and most conceptions are not the result of crimes (although I can understand someone drawing a bright moral line between different pregnancies based on that factor).
As a hobbyist musician I'm bemused by the stickiness of the concept of a DAW. There are so many all-in-one devices that meet the definition of each letter in the acronym. But DAW is a proxy for something else, vaguely more professional or expensive.

Then you have the idea of DAWless. Oh well, every field has its vestigial jargon.
Reading things like this make me wonder why the company did not hire someone like this person to check their code + hardware + processes first.

But sigh, doing the right thing that costs $ ahead of disaster is rare. Over time I've seen this too many times...
> Your assertion is obviously ridiculous, traveling gay men will not be arrested simply for being gay.

Your assertion is oblivious to the modern sensibilities of "Law and Order." Gay men will be arrested on "reasonable suspicion" of having had gay sex. And even when the suspicion is not found to be reasonable, there will be zero ramifications for the arresting officers.
When I looked first time through telescope at the brightest "star" and saw another 4 smaller "stars" perfectly aligned with it I had a "WTF wrong with this Universe?" moment before realizing it was Jupiter :)
We're also the product of generations of people dying prematurely of diseases like polio; our lives would be quite a bit different if infant/child mortality had been 0% for the last 100k years.

Should we not wipe out polio because our ancestors couldn't?
When you’ve got hardly any registers you don’t have any choices how to allocate them. What’s maddening is a chip like the 8086 where you have enough registers that how you allocate them matters, but still very little space to work in. You are left working hard on a register allocator that is still not going to be very food.
Google Answers (2006)
He tried teaching for a year but sounds like he isn't going to stick with it.

“I just finished my first year of teaching and Last Call BBS hasn’t even been released yet! I was hoping that I’d really like teaching and stay with that for a few years, but I learned that’s definitely not the case and I’m having a hard time imagining anything other than games in my future, in some shape or form.”
Computer chips powered by human brain cells already exist – but is it ethical?
It seems like it's not true on a MacBook with the Apple M1 processor; SHA-256 is now significantly faster. It still seems to be true on a couple of Intel machines I have access to.
Ask him! I bet he has a lot of the critical insight about what works best for him.
(Maybe he's already expressing it?) And I also bet that asking him is the correct first step to integrating the insight he doesn't have.
And I bet the fine details matter.

"when Leonardo painted the portrait of Ginevra de Benci in
the National Gallery, he put a juniper bush behind her head.
In it he carefully painted each individual leaf. Many
painters might have thought, this is just something to put
in the background to frame her head. No one will look that
closely at it.

Not Leonardo. How hard he worked on part of a painting
didn't depend at all on how closely he expected anyone to
look at it. He was like Michael Jordan. Relentless.

Relentlessness wins because, in the aggregate, unseen
details become visible. When people walk by the portrait of
Ginevra de Benci, their attention is often immediately
arrested by it, even before they look at the label and
notice that it says Leonardo da Vinci. All those unseen
details combine to produce something that's just stunning,
like a thousand barely audible voices all singing in tune."

~ https://www.paulgraham.com/hp.html

We all experience levels of communication that go beyond sufficient or effective.
There's probably a zone of virtuosity that's hard to get to but invaluable if achieved where his way of communicating best is obviously neither defective nor deficient but uniquely, non-fungibly, performant and contributive. I feel unlocking unaccessed virtuosity is the key to achieving the truly apex outcomes we all want.

Kudos to you for striving to be inclusive!

EDIT check this out:

"Benefit: More opportunities for quiet voices
In many teams there are a combination of voices, some
quieter and some more assertive. Having this diversity on a
team is really beneficial, but can make it hard for everyone
to be heard. Quiet voices can find it harder to find a space
to interject their thoughts, or prefer to take time to think
about their response before communicating it, risking the
topic ending before the thought is shared.

Text communication doesn’t discriminate against this
difference in communication style. Everyone can share their
ideas at their own pace, and the reader never knows how long
it might have taken to put thoughts into words. There’s no
waiting for turns, and order is more often determined by who
is online when, and what time in their schedule they have
blocked out for messages."

~https://buffer.com/resources/asynchronous-meetings/
Do you not understand that the "Federal agencies having too much power" is a superficial complaint they use when things work against them, but are happy to flip when it's in their favor?

One easy example, the Trump EPA attempted to ban states from setting their own fuel economy standards via an administrative ruling: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/trump-administration-announ.... It also went further banning other states from adopting California's standards for vehicles by unilaterally deciding that emissions rules can't apply to greenhouse gases that are emitted from cars....
History will NOT have a dim view of the left.

Thomas Paine, an example of a radical leftists in his own time by the standards of his day, is extremely well regarded today despite dying in relative obscurity and relative poverty.

It's the radical right wing that history will take a dim view on. The left can be secure in their control of posterity.
I suspect the adage about "a measure which becomes a target ceases to become a good measure" applies here

Part of the reason most workers work a set number of hours rather than negotiating piecework or payment delivered on achieving KPIs or set objectives, after all, is that organizations seldom have a concrete idea of what output they expect over a period of time. (And some of the objectives that are clearly defined and stable over time like "drive this bus route" or "answer calls during this period" actually collapse quite well into working hours)
We cant ignore the consequences of linking our viewing and posting habits to an identity, either. Some people don't appreciate being profiled. Simply picking a username that is not your real name does not fully address that.
I don't know about other people's giant hovercraft, but mine sank after it was somehow filled with eels.
Then why is no one doing anything to support babies if we want so many? Here's how to incentivise having children:

- Remove fear of healthcare costs. All children can use Medicare. Cover pregnancy too.

- Stop worries about schools. Bring all schools up to an acceptable level. Hire teachers at underperforming schools until the number of adults is high enough to handle extreme bad behavior and give every child a shot at a decent classroom experience.

- Paid leave. Make it feasible to have a kid in your 20s without tanking your career. Have it come from social security, so you don't have to plan your pregnancy around which company you want to work for.

- Fix housing costs. Make it easy to afford a nice house in your 20s, so having a kid doesn't feel like adding to an ongoing disaster.

The list of things you could do to encourage having kids goes on and on. Of course you could just force pregnancies on the unwilling instead, if that's the kind of person you want to be.
collectively societies decide and create laws to that effect. Some societies have laws that include decapitation, severing limbs, and stoning. Others see this behavior as inhumane.
In the Netherlands, companies can sponsor a software engineer for a work visa as a highly-skilled immigrant. In Germany, a software engineer can easily get a blue card, which gives someone the right to work and live there.

In both of these countries, the first step is to get a job offer from a company and go from there.
is there a destroying exception to the conception line of thinking?
Life is also the wrong indicator, tardigrades and ants are alive. But what defines a human is its cognitive abilities. This is why its OK to terminate a coma patient. Fetuses and coma patients are exactly the same, without the host/machine to keep them alive, they will die on their own.
People are guaranteed early, unnecessary deaths when they cannot afford expensive medical treatments for their rare conditions. Or insulin for their diabetes. Or housing for their family.

Where in our constitution and laws are these things codified as rights? They are not.

In the same way, abortion is not a right. But I believe it should be. This is an issue that our elected officials must decide, not the courts.
the Internet is here to stay. too useful for commerce and disseminating propaganda globally. it will remain, in some perverse walled-garden form

general purpose computation though... I feel it's already on the chopping block. I think we'll see the first signs during the upcoming "cyber pandemic".
The Key of Lisp (1987)
Well I think there are laws that vary across counties and cities and that’s an interesting idea to apply abortion to.

Having different laws for different individual people seems like a really bad idea though.
When Did Perfume Stop Being About Sex?
Do tell me where the government was imprisoning people for not taking these experimental immunotherapies.
Yes! This should be the future of government
Use it as webcam with help of Camo
> We make class hierarchies in order to simplify the code by allowing different parts of it to be changed independently of each other, and to eliminate duplication (which comes to the same thing).

Yeah. Exactly. Which is why Dog extends Animal. It has a set of common features (code/behaviors, and data like number of legs, amount of fur, and so on). It is a really good analogy and a really good point to give someone an idea of why you would use inheritance. It requires absolutely no programming knowledge, and best of all, it's not difficult to imagine cases where you might actually use it. c.f. basically any game with dogs in it where they're a subclass of NPCs.

And the same for Car extends Vehicle. A vehicle can have any number of wheels and any number of doors. A car can have any number of doors but it always has 4 wheels. All cars move in approximately the same way, while vehicles can articulate or skid-steer or ...

Just because something is simplified does not mean it has no value. And just because *you* would not use these designs in *your* life does not mean others wouldn't. As TFA says: "unless they are talking about writing a clone of The Sims".
Your phrasing begs the question. Would you run into a burning IVF clinic to save the embryos?
Falcon Heavy is certain an impressive engineering feat, but it doesn’t compare to the Voyager 1 (40 years ago!) in terms of new science and new frontiers.

Industry is better than academia when it comes to getting to scale and reducing costs. But usually new frontiers and new science does not often have those constraints.
The framing of this debate is often religious, but it doesn't have to be. The fact is that at some point between inception and time of delivery, the fetus becomes a person and has some rights. Most people agree that it's probably not inception and it's probably not the moment before birth. So the question is when does this happen?

In that way, the pro-life crowd has at least a closer framing of the issue. The pro-choice crowd is talking about religion, privacy, social safety nets, etc. But that's all beside the point. If the fetus is a life, none of this stuff matters. We should all try and at least agree upon the framing of the issue and argue from there or we'll never get anywhere.
You don't understand how law is made. Legislation is only one source of law. Others include judicial rulings, customs and expert testimony accepted by a court.
>Compelled paternity isn’t a matter of bodily autonomy

>Child support isn't a matter of bodily autonomy

A man can be ordered by a court to obtain a job to pay for the child or risk being thrown in prison for refusing to comply. Even terminating parental rights does not remove him from the obligation of paying child support. There has never been a case of compelled maternity (compulsion to mother a child) as every state, even the ones that will now be able to criminalize abortions, allow a mother to surrender her child within a period of at least 72 hours.

> The law can theoretically compel everyone to be vaccinated, not just men. That’s equal protection under the law. It’s also only available in public health crises - not routine.

Equal violation is not equal protection. Otherwise slavery would be OK as long as you could find a persuasive or compelling enough interest for it and found that it could be equally applied to men and women. That's not how rights work. They're inalienable. You either have them or you don't.

> Again sterilization has been applied to men and women.

Same as above.

> Selective service is maybe the only analog to forced birth, and even that has carve outs for religious and moral beliefs.

Carveouts and concessions only make the violation of a right palatable, not reasonable or justifiable. Several states that oppose abortions have carveouts for incest, rape, and/or threats to the health of the mother. In spite of these carveouts, I reject that states or even the federal government should have a say on what one does with one's body in the first place with "special" cases being negotiated after the fact.
I’ve been immersed in it most of my life. I can’t say the same about Muslims because I never was one.
I'd be down with this if it used the OS sync (iCloud / Google Drive etc) and wasn't a subscription. As it stands, it looks like it charges monthly just to use a sync that I can't trust.
Burner phone numbers in the US seem to be of a particular range of numbers and can also be flagged. I used to use pay as you go burners for random tasks in the past and noticed they gave me trouble when trying to use them to get verification codes sometimes.
Because depending on your viewpoint there’s multiple persons rights at play. The woman, the man, the “child”. They need to be balanced some way.
There may be nothing intrinsically bad but it tends to be associated with bad ideas and cause bad outcomes.
Politics and the English Language (1946) [pdf]
So, the government never forced you to take a vaccine. You were only mandated to do so for employment purposes and public health. Persons are/were at risk of spreading disease to unwilling participants. Your freedom ends at my nose. Now, that being said, I agree, it was pretty heavy handed. Constitutionally breaking? Probably not.

This is using the power of the state to compel women to give birth to a child after having carried it for 9 years. Your right to alcohol and other risky behaviors is also revoked as that is child endangerment. Now what about the child for the next 18 years? That is truly constitutionally problematic.
Also, I don't see any actual tests verifying the output is correct.

Gist of the algorithm seems to be classify numbers into buckets based on their factor of range (min, max values), then sort each bucket recursively if greater than 1000 elements or use conventional sorts before serially combining all the buckets for the result.
> You can't have it both ways!

You can when the two ways have different contexts.

> force you to take injections of experimental immunotherapies

Leaving aside the misleading "experimental" part, the bodily rights context here was "being part of a society" - this was a huge public health crisis - people not having the vaccine impacted on a greater part of society than just themselves.

The bodily rights context for abortion is "a single person".

Two clearly different situations, no?