skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Did I miss something or was Neumorphism just that designers rediscovered inset shadows?
We're just putting new names on a design cycle that's been going on for decades, maybe centuries. Things get more ornate until it's so over the top we wipe it all clean and start over.
In the US? Almost everything.
I love this take because it's almost there but it's narrowly missing the point just to draw a huge straw man. Ransomware is not specifically enabled by cryptography. It's enabled by people providing "money laundering as a service" which is an apt description for cryptocurrencies.
California needs to separate into more States, or people should move to help turn Red States purple.

Edit: Since HN is rate-limiting me. There have been proposals that try to either give a Red State advantage, in particular, the electoral college. However, California could reasonably be split into 7 states (2 Red, 5 Blue) that would still have greater populations than Utah, netting +3 sets of Senators.
Pinatubo threw 37 times more SO2 into the atmosphere.
How is that a compromise... a controversial judgement you like is fair the one you don't isn't? That's not a standard.
Degree is the reason why Europe still lacks behind the US when it comes to startups
I like KK's work, but the first part of this article is weird. It's more of an argument for why you should leave pull strings in your empty conduit.

That said, I agree with the idea of generally buying only what you need and buying it at the time you need it.
No, if you mistype the password then the server can't look up your escrowed RSA key (it's looked up with an "authentication key" derived from PBKDF2).
Personally there is nothing I find less interesting than a new file system. The most interesting thing that can happen is that your files get vaporized. I tend to stick with ext4 and ZFS.
More generally I would encourage your teammate to check out JAN - Job Accommodation Network [0], and sit down with HR to discuss what they need.

They also have a nice a-z list [1] of every disability, limitation, and workfunction. You might find something for yourself that you struggle with and didn't know could be accommodated. Anything from physical limitations to random phobias can be accomodated.

[0] https://askjan.org/disabilities/Deafness.cfm

[1] https://askjan.org/a-to-z.cfm
Rape is hard to prove and it doesn't necessarily mean co-parenting with the rapist, I think it's even more likely that he avoids responsibility and escapes than become a parent.

And the second issue seems to be an issue of bureaucracy and it's slowness.

Those cases are both valid where I think most people would argue it's not as clear cut but I think they are mostly the exception, not the rule.
Power lifters don't train constantly. It's nothing like endurance or skill sports where training itself is almost a full-time job. The actual number of hours spent actively lifting is typically pretty low. They spend more time on active recovery and nutrition (and sometimes PEDS).
For these kinds of things, especially in a virtual meeting, having a "side channel" chat can be entirely helpful - I do it for people who aren't fully paying attention or are otherwise distracted.
>Enable automatic software updates

This is one I'm always torn about.

There are countless iOS and Android apps that forever ruined by future updates. And unless you have the older version lying around (ipa/apk) then you can never downgrade. I experienced similar with MacOS apps too and generally on other OSes as well. I'm okay with automatic software updates for the OS but for general standalone apps not so much.
> democrat party

I wonder if this one has a partisan axe to grind
Lots of anti-Catholic comments and anti-Christian comments here.

To blame this on Christians/Catholics is singling out a religion, a protected group similar to blaming Blacks or Jews. In fact its exactly the same - its literally a protected class.
Sure; you could also look for all-zero SIDs. That relies on you knowing about this attack a priori, and if you know about it you can just not have the vulnerability.
In the case you laid out you do have the right to X.
> The advanced stuff

> For the security enthusiast, who wants to go the extra mile.

> 16. Use a password manager

Hard disagree. Using a decent password manager ought to be considered one of the baby steps of online security.
Bud, It’s been downhill for almost the entirety of millennials and for the entirety of the younger generations lives.

22 years of downhill might be short term for a nation but it’s not for people
You, with a straight face, are trying to say that a government restricting your rights is totally the same as the policy of an employer?

And you're telling me that a vaccine which is obscenely safe, you are more likely to die from tripping down the stairs in your own home than you are to die from the vaccine, is totally the same as childbirth? Where nearly 1000 women die every year, many are left with serious conditions, where women are left in poverty where they can't care for those children.

Come on. Your position is beyond absurd.
I run a few websites on a single Linode, they're quite snappy if you don't do too much. No fancy optimizations required, just keep it vanilla, you can make great websites with just modern HTML, JS, CSS: https://krisshamloo.com

I'm sure it's been posted to HN before, but I love this blog post about it: https://idlewords.com/talks/website_obesity.htm
So you seem to be saying that anyone taking hormonal birth control could be technically commit a crime (manslaughter) but it's just not feasible to prosecute?

What about spontaneous abortion (miscarriage)? If the women is found negligent such as taking excessive risks (smoking, drinking, excessive age, some strenuous physical activity) they are also technically committing manslaughter correct? Again regardless of how viable it is to prosecute such a crime, are they committing a crime?
> They are not viewed as “similarly objectionable”. The death penalty is viewed as being within the legitimate power of government doctrinally

Respectfully, no. The catechism reads, "the death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person"[0]. This is a recent revision, and what you say reflects what was officially taught until 2017.

[0]: https://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P7Z.HTM
Because there is an explicit provision on guns in the constitution. No mention of or allusion to abortion in the constitution. If the US wants to protect abortion through the constitution, they are free to do so. The US constitution has been amended many times. But that takes an even broader consensus.
Nonsense. If moderates believed that they would form their own party and stake out territory. Instead they say 'the two party system forces this on us', and do nothing about it. There is no 'two party system.' It's just a bistable equilibrium state that arises out of the winner-take-all voting system. Moderates find it profitable to ride that oscillation without worrying too much about where it takes them, and prefer stable mediocrity to chaotic uncertainty.
> i personally didn't think it looked at all aesthetically pleasing, but because they were relatively expensive for running shoes, i'm guessing that the man decided to pair them with his high fashion look.

I'll sometimes do this sort of thing when I travel. Lot easier to travel light when you don't need a separate pair of running shoes.
Except the goalposts have now been moved. We should anticipate that Republicans in the US Congress will attempt to codify a federal ban on abortion in all 50 states. Indeed, many are already advocating this. We should also anticipate that other freedoms once thought protected by the US Constitution and Supreme Court will come under threat. Justice Thomas writes in his concurring opinion in Dobbs that he would like to see Obergefell, Lawrence and Grisword overturned. These decisions protect same-sex marriage, same-sex relationships, and contraception.

The overturning of Roe comes just days after another ruling by the same Supreme Court in which they took away states' rights to regulate the possession of guns. States rights has always been a rhetorical tactic used by conservatives as a convenient ruse to achieve their aims. When the argument from states rights is helpful to their political aims, they rely on it. When it's harmful, they ignore it.
The government has had practically zero control over cash transactions, historically speaking.

Government has had extremely tight control over cash transactions.

1. Try to give someone $100,000,000 in cash. It literally weighs over a ton. The government stopped printing bills > $100 in 1946 explicitly to control cash transactions. With inflation, the largest bills we have to work with are worth about $30 in 1946 dollars.

2. Look up AML and BSA legislation, "Know Your Customer" regulations, Form 8300, Structuring Deposits. Did you know that a bank has to report you to the government if you deposit more than $10,000 in cash? And that if you deposit $6,000 on a Wednesday and $4,000 on a Thursday with perfectly legal money in an attempt to avoid the reporting that you have broken the law? (https://www.irs.gov/irm/part4/irm_04-026-013#:~:text=Structu....)

3. Try to open up a bank account and tell them you'll be depositing lots of cash. They'll refuse to open an account for you.

And admittedly this is today's U.S. government. But governments haven't just taken a "oh well" approach to cash ever in all of history.
So if a group of people form a militia, do they then as militia have right to produce let's say nuclear weapons? As those are "arms" and thus shall not be infringed. Can federal government or state control what type of weapons these militias manufacture, import and hold?
Also, as the danger shrinks. It's similar to, but not the same as, basic needs being met. But as medicine reduces the need to have 17 kids to have one survive to adulthood, people have fewer kids.
I mean if you're going to be pedantic, what about "well regulated militia"?
David, I am highly concerned about fairly new and poorly understood zkproof systems vs transparent blockchains for long term storage. Monero, Grin, Zcash; have all had their issues.

What would be required in your mind for you to trust Mina to accurately and retrievably store your life savings?
How long until then?
I think the pro life crowd sees a significant difference between a fetus/baby/whatever and a random person.

Probably something like, you are responsible for the creating of the fetus/baby/whatever so you have more of an obligation to it than you do to other people.
Anecdata^2: nothing reduces my craving for smoked meat. not sure excersise was the cause of my disintereset in fried foods, or just the realization of negative health benefits. excersise however most definitely does not reduce the cravings for alcohol. hell, i've been on soccer teams that was just an excuse to hang out to drink beer after the game. this wasn't world cup level, but we definitely worked out during play.

in other words, to me, there's just too many differences to make conclusions
"I'm not going to try to convince you to start writing a blog, since that has to be something you want to do, but I will point out that there's a large gap that's waiting to be filled by your knowledge. When I started writing this blog, I figured almost no one would ever read it; sure Joel Spolsky and Steve Yegge created widely read blogs, but that was back when almost no one was blogging. Now that there are millions of blogs, there's just no way to start a new blog and get noticed. Turns out that's not true." - Dan Luu https://danluu.com/about/

As of late he is also supported on patreon: https://www.patreon.com/danluu
Good faith is a necessary condition, not a sufficient one. If you're proposing something bad I'm going to oppose you regardless of whether you're proposing it in good faith.
Long ago in the games industry I was applying for a position at a studio. Didn't end up getting a job but a friend did. A few months later he was bemoaning their terrible code base which included a car class that inherited from wheel four times.
Please look elsewhere in the thread for more explicit textual refutation of your views...
I believe there are ways to disable phone for Zoom calls ... but that needs buy-in (you can disable audio conferencing, and say it's for "security reasons").
That's fair, but to be clear, you think someone should be allowed to terminate their pregnancy up until the moment of birth?
I have no idea who dan luu is, but I imagine he does something very similar for his day job.
Nerds like us make the same mistake over and over again. "If an HTTP request receives a 200 OK response, then that is by definition proof that a request for access was made and granted." No, no, no, a million times no. The government can make a law that regulates which requests are legitimate and which aren't. And they can compel you to follow those rules. And they can come to your house with guns if you don't. And they can put your physical body in a holding cell if you resist. It literally doesn't matter what the protocol says. Code is not in fact law.
Exactly correct, and today's ruling still doesn't prevent Congress from acting. They had 50 years to codify Roe into law, but they didn't. And now they'll come out and try to deflect the blame onto the Supreme Court, which is beyond absurd but will work to convince a whole lot of people.

I have my own personal feelings on abortion, but as far as laws on it go I honestly don't care one way or another. So if all of these Congresspeople want to come out and say that the majority of the country wants abortion to be legal nationwide, then they need to DO THEIR FUCKING JOBS and pass a law to make it so.
> What if we move the scripts to source/_includes/custom/after_footer.html?

Please don't do this, this is the slowest possible way to load these resources and the longest duration possible until a fully interactive page. Use "async" or "defer" attributes instead.
And people wonder why decisions can be made and polarization continues to increase.

"Who cares what they think indeed"
The philosophy of not adding language constructs beyond what is required for the type system.

Typescript code without type annotations should be JavaScript compatible, minus features still in flight for standardisation.

There are other languages for that like ReasonML.
This attack breaks non-browser-Javascript clients.
I feel like I am talking to a brick wall.

Any state law that deprives someone of life and / or liberty is unconstitutional.

If someone needs a life-saving abortion, the state cannot deprive that person their constitutional right to life.
From the decision:

"The largely limitless reach of the dissenters’ standard is
illustrated by the way they apply it here. First, if the “long
sweep of history” imposes any restraint on the recognition
of unenumerated rights, then Roe was surely wrong, since
abortion was never allowed (except to save the life of the
mother) in a majority of States for over 100 years before
that decision was handed down. Second, it is impossible to
defend Roe based on prior precedent because all of the precedents Roe cited, including Griswold and Eisenstadt, were
critically different for a reason that we have explained:
None of those cases involved the destruction of what Roe
called “potential life.”"
> And it does map so well onto the underlying reality of fundamentally mutable hardware.

It maps well to the abstraction provided by the hardware. In reality we know that modern architectures are executing instructions out-of-order for efficiencies' sake and that data-accesses are not necessarily sequential either. And we haven't even considered multiple-core processors that are so common these days!

As Bird points out in his book, when one looks close enough there are cases where the logarithmic gap between the imperative vs. functional approach disappears.

And further, with register targeting and stuff it's not often true that recursive calls are less efficient than their imperative counterparts anymore... although I suppose historically this could be why, at least for small arrays, imperative programmers could assume constant-time indexing and updating.

I'm not nearly as versed in functional programming as I'd like to be. I was raised on C and algorithms were always described in terms of procedures to me where the proofs took quite a bit of work to follow. However as I learn more about algorithm design in functional programming and functional data structures I can't help but notice that the proofs are much easier to follow while sometimes the solution seems quite alien and I wonder if that's because of my heritage of thinking operationally rather than by calculation. I've often been surprised to learn that many of my assumptions about the logarithmic complexity of functional algorithms are not always there!
Not sure why you’re downvoted, my wife is catholic and you’re right on every point. I would even go further and say deviating from the standard ritual of catholic mass is probably a big no-no in the church and could land a priest in hot water.
I don't see why you'd debate that. You could debate what the rights of the mother vs. the rights of the unborn baby are until you're blue in the face and you'd be unlikely to convince the other side that they're wrong. What matters is that a large group of people think the abortion is an acceptable procedure and those that disagree aren't directly impacted by the decision. That alone should be enough to enshrine it as a right. We're a free country after all, which generally means people can do as they please so long as it doesn't negatively impact others.
If this works, it’s a legitimately good idea.
Otherwise the thief might realize he can’t connect and try to wipe the device directly.
Ask HN: Well-written open source Swift Mac apps to learn from?
I'm looking to learn Swift to write a couple of very basic Mac apps in XCode, mostly for personal use.

I've always learned much faster by reading other people's production code, can anyone recommend some well-written open source Mac Swift apps for me to read the code of?
Ah yes the compulsive bully, holds secret meetings with foreign powers, frequently breaks human rights laws in Europe. Ofcourse she would!
From outside perspective so many parts of judicial system being elected individuals seem sort of part of the problem. Them being elected means that there is very perverse incentive to work with. Ofc, there need to be way to recall those misusing the power or not following the laws. But maybe campaigning isn't the best way to do.
It's far from certain they can produce the parts in question at all.
Poll data suggests that the plurality of the population do not support third-trimester abortions, but neither do they support a prohibition on first-trimester.

The reality is that what we consider a "life" is graduated, and the fetus progresses along that continuum during gestation. Most people know this intuitively, which is why popular opinion generally falls where it does. (See, for example, the Pew polls on the subject of abortion and trimesters.)

We struggle to draw a bright-line to say, "this is where life begins," because there is not really a point where life "begins," merely a long series of points where it shifts by degree from "no life" to "life."

As a society though we still are tasked with drawing this line and it is an arbitrary line. But it is illogical for it to begin at the very start of the continuum, or at the very end. The beginning because it is silly and unscientific to pretend as though some tiny clump of cells has any more life than a wart, and it comes at great cost to women's autonomy; the end because it is illogical to believe that a baby the moment prior to birth is a fundamentally different being than at the moment after. To believe that the moment is at either end is thoughtless dogmatism.

Where should the line be? Pick a point. Give the woman enough time to be able to know that she is pregnant, to plan and provide for her bodily autonomy to make her own life choices, and to deal with lead times at clinics. And then draw a line where the choice has been made. Most people believe that line is somewhere around the end of the first trimester or early part of the second.
Porsche, Lamborghini, Bentley and Bugatti are also owned by Volkswagen. That doesn't make them any less expensive.
> They should teach this in MBA day school.

it's a basic dichotomy of long versus short-term thinking. markets in general and their people tend to be on the short-term side.
thats the thing, we dont even know what sentient life means. we arbitrarily define it as human and nothing else (hence we are okay with killing billions of animals for food yearly, not debating that just making a point). so if we are not sure when the life begins indeed we should be more considerate of other factors/right that we may be impacting like womens right to bodily autonomy or even just safety.

None of that matters to these zealots. taking a step back, if you look at it with your real world glasses (i.e.. not lawyer ones) you'll realize this is just a bunch of religious crowd trying to backdoor their religion into law. I mean realistically how much of self doubt and introspection Trump crowd you think has had about this issue? How many of them do you think would even be participating in these debates except to 'trigger the libs'?
The Texas law forbids people from getting abortions in other states, where people have no representation in the Texas legislature by giving Texas citizens the right to sue them in Texas courts.

More generally problematic, your view would let any state persecute a minority of voters in that state and bind the federal government from guaranteeing equal protection to all Americans. We’ve run this experiment and found a long history of enforcing slavery, segregation, and persecution of gay people. Minority rights need special protections from the local majorities in states, and the 14th amendment is in no small part representing the will of the majority recognizing the rights of minorities are vulnerable here. Restricting a women’s ability to get a medical procedure a heavily gerrymandered state legislature finds distasteful is the latest in the long line of states rights consequences here.
> Money that could instead be spent money building more schools and paying teachers more.

I get the logic but irl that sounds like a false equivalency to me,

We don’t spend money on ornamentation/whimsy *and* we also don’t spend money on more schools, etc. we simply spend less and get less - but this approach is more palatable in most large organizations/modern-societies with weak leadership/vison.

(Kind of like the old adage that nobody got fired for buying IBM)
Roe and Casey recognized and dealt with the competing interests involved in abortion. That's why it allowed some restrictions on abortion while declining to do so for similar issues like contraception, interracial marriage, and gay marriage. The status quo did not ignore the interests of the unborn child, while the new status quo completely ignores the interests of the woman.

Reproductive rights are fundamental to women's liberty and equality. They should be protected by the courts like many other fundamental rights, not subject to the whims of political majorities.
Pig heart transplant failed as its heart muscle cells died
I have no idea if the plumber or HVAC or any of the other people I hire pay their taxes or reports their income.
+1 anecdata: cardio (though I take my heart rate to 175 bpm for 10+ minutes) absolutely makes me not hungry for hours. Lifting doesn't affect hunger, though I make sure I get enough calories.