skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
From another corner of the "search" universe, I get most of my daily information doses through the lens of a collection of RSS feeds I've built up over the years. My feed collection is intolerant to toxic content, although I still see random toxic stuff on the "wild web" (YT, FB, etc.) every now and again.

Does it put me in a bubble? Yeah. But it's a bubble of my own design, and it's a pretty nice place from my POV, that reflects my real world interests, hobbies, etc.

I see goggles as a parallel system for "I'm looking for something specific" search.

I think Goggles might turn out to be a mild retardant to toxic bubble formation, because toxic content is rocket fuel for the kind of "engagement" metrics that google/youtube/twitter/fb have spent the last decade min-maxing.

IMO, existing "search" players (Google, FB, Twitter) are culpable for toxic echo chamber formation, only to the extent that they push toxic content "by default". By allowing users to fine-tune their weights, Brave+Goggles is attempting to dislodge this norm by introducing user feedback into the equation. Like you, I think it's a good idea.

Some people will always opt-in to toxic bubbles, but I think that's more of a human/society problem and not one for a search player to solve.
The Docker UX is what made the difference, not the underlying tech. Building containers in an easy incremental and reproducible way that could then be stored in a repo and pulled over HTTP was the evolution in packaging that was needed.

UX alone can be a multi-billion dollar business, for example Dropbox was just a folder that syncs. I'll leave you to find that classic HN comment about it. Docker just executed poorly and didn't have much worth paying for.
Cassandra and most of the Hadoop zoo too, but that's mostly because of a few vendors. (Eg. DataStax for Cassandra, and Cloudera & Hortonworks for Hadoop. Plus probably a bunch of smaller ones.)
To add onto this, I have been using Libreoffice Online or Collabora Online for the last 4 years or so. I used to compile LOOL myself but eventually I just switched over to using the Collabora Online Development Edition that Collabora releases. I am using it integrated with Nextcloud.

I enjoy using it and it has been a life savior for the times I need to work on a document with someone else since I can just send them a share link for it. The fact that it uses leaflet which is meant for maps does mean that the latency to the server matters quite a lot to experience but I don't mind that much, personally, with my not great 120ms RTT to my server.
Why cameras are soon going to be everywhere
My point here is: concerns with undesirable wealth distribution (in a hard money system) make IMO no sound argument against hard money. Because there's ways to redistribute wealth through the state.

Besides that, if the current wealth distribution (under non hard money) isn't all but a calamity, then what is it?

Also most states are currently doing effective redistribution of wealth so it's clearly something that can be done. One issue though in most states is that the redistribution is getting outpaced by countering effects, so it's insufficient.
The grid, even if its your connection between your mains and your car, needs to be set up to limit the output of the car's batteries. Or the car (powerwall, etc) does.

Yes, and it does have those limits in place for charging, some in software (by the EV charge controller telling the car how much power it can use), some hardware (through at least 2 circuit breakers). Why wouldn't the same limits be enforced if using the car for grid storage?

Why does the max power output of a car battery have any bearing on whether it can be used for grid storage?
I'm sure you see the need for a trademark system* so you can reliably buy products that you like and not fraudulent imitations. Try to make up a set of rules that give you the features you want from a trademark system and which don't have the features you don't want. That's what the trademark system we have is an attempt to do.

*even if you don't see the need for a trademark system, what matters is whether a majority of everybody else does, which it's pretty easy to see they do in a consumerist society.
Disrupted by SpaceX, ULA was in ‘serious trouble.’ Now it’s on the road back
Just make the arguments about fundamental problems with the legal system. This is a sensational portrayal of a specific trademark that riles people up because it involves an extremely common English word, but of course anyone who has read about trademarks for a few minutes knows that this is nothing at all like "owning the word 'the'" or "having the right to sue anyone who puts the word 'the' on any clothing."
> but I wouldn't be suprised if there are windows users who are still downloading OpenOffice

Definitely. I have been using OpenOffice for years until I found out by accident that LibreOffice exists... It's a shame!
GDR had dropping birthrate as well as peaking suicide rate
A lack of ability to imagine something shouldn't cause someone to believe it can't happen. There are any number of ways someone can go homeless including under the conditions of having the skills to program. I've been able to program since I was 12 and definitely could've gone homeless any time between now and around 3 years ago (which is nearly 2 decades of time).
Mmm, gonna try, thanks.

Hmmm, can't find that discussions tab.
This.

You need a last resort security control against stuff like this anyway. Even an automation failure or misunderstanding of a ruleset can leave you exposed.

Security must be layered.
I imaging hydrogen can be stored, but not for long, witch means we store it and slowly it "evaporate" going through the tank.

BTW let's talk about an example: Toyota Mirai, far complex than an EV, complex than an ICE, ~1kg H₂ / 100 km. Now let's say we have spend 67kWh of green electricity to produce that kg of H₂, the process have some loss, again I can't really know how much but some [1] say are around 14%, not bad but still a certain amount of loss. Than the energy need to compress resulting gas to 700 bars. Energy to push it in the car tank. At the end of the game you get what? 33-34kWh out of initial 67?

100 km? A Tesla do 100 km with around 18kWh... Surely and H₂ fuel-cell system have far more power than a lithium one, around five time per similar size/weight, so we can potentially power trucks, even planes with hydrogen, while we practically can't [2] with lithium.

Again trying to imaging a possible hydrogen-based vehicles scenario we end up in far cheaper "energetically speaking" blue/grey hydrogen but what's it's point? We can burn directly hydrocarbons, we already use them. Using them to make hydrogen means just spent a lot for a new supply chain and just shift pollution outside citizens sight. With the benefit of running on 700 bars bombs under our asses...

[1] https://mdpi-res.com/d_attachment/materials/materials-12-019...

[2] yes I know eVTOL experiments, they can't scale behind such kind of very expensive personal toys with lithium chemistry for energy source
Andrew, thank you for the feedback. This is something we'd love to be able to be better at and would love any advice you may have.

We send the rate with each developer. We don't have a flat rate; otherwise, that means we set the rate. The developers set their own rate and we send that over with their profiles after you state what you're looking for and who in our platform is a match.

What's a better way of going about this?
I'm pretty sure OpenBSD is (relatively) slow regardless of hyperthreading,

Agree about NTFS-3g, it's next to useless. I've read somewhere that some optimizations are not enabled on OpenBSD.

Still, I like it and use it on my laptop and servers.
I'm 100% in line with the first point of TFA : learning OpenBSD is a good investment, you feel that you steadily build up an coherent understanding of the system.
Huh, this is interesting to me. My house has 400A service (or at least that's the main panel breaker size). 400A at 240V is somewhere in the ballpark of 80kW possible draw.

Does something bad happen if I actually use my home's full service for an extended period? I understand bad things would happen if everyone on my block did.

As a thought experiment, would anything bad happen if a magic wand was waved over a neighborhood, and each individual house now supplied power to the grid in the same amount it would usually be consuming it? A whole neighborhood with normal electric flow, just reversed. Are there components of the grid that are unable to deal with reverse power in the exact same quantity and load distribution as forward power?
> Containers already existed

Fascinating. I'm admittedly very new to container-land, but my understanding was precisely the opposite - that Docker invented this concept and practice of building a runtime environment that can then be replicated and deployed to many hosts. Do you have any search terms or articles I should pursue to learn more about the predecessors?

I've read through this[0], but it mostly suggests that approaches prior to Docker provided isolation/jailing, which is an important part of containerization but neglects a lot of tooling around building, deploying, etc.

[0] https://blog.aquasec.com/a-brief-history-of-containers-from-...

EDIT: various other comments ("The Docker UX is what made the difference, not the underlying tech. Building containers in an easy incremental and reproducible way that could then be stored in a repo and pulled over HTTP was the evolution in packaging that was needed.", "I think the feature that won the hearts of devs was the incremental builds that let people fail quickly in a forgiving way", "Containers were painful as hell to set up and use; it was like using Git, but worse. Docker made it convenient, simple, and useful. By now everybody understands that immutable artifacts and simple configuration formats are extremely effective") seem to support this perception.

EDIT2: Thanks to all those that replied!
https://www.notion.so/what3wordsnotion/Auto-Partners-using-w...

Mercedes, Ford, Jaguar, Land Rover, Lamborghini, Mitsubishi, Subaru, Lotus, Triumph & Tata Motors all accept what3words.
Docker is an imperfect solution to problems we shouldn't have after decades of Linux and Unix and its value is exactly in its DX.

But considering the pride in finding the right incantation to build C/C++ code, to set up a system service, to set up routing rules or any other advanced feature... I guess anything that tries to hide it will count as hype
Thanks for the feedback, I see your point! That's on oversight on our side, nothing nefarious intended, we'll have to figure how to best spell out the pricing.

Pricing-wise, I'd say the all-in fees on a per dev basis are comparable to a developer's salary here in the US (Austin, TX), the fees are all inclusive of benefits, tech equipment, offices, perks, etc...

When you decide to make an offer to someone, you'll get a break down of 1) the teammates's personal salary requirement), 2) the benefits and taxes and, 3) our management fee.

Because we don't set the rates, the candidates do (just like in the US), it's hard to say exactly what the price will be, it depends on the individual's requirements.

That said, we can def offer guidance on what the market tends to be!
I don't see the problem as long as it's directed toward a prosocial aim.
Money was a technology long before crypto. Those in power have been using their control over money to leverage control over the physical world for millennia. In modern times this control has belonged to national governments, but historically religious institutions like the Knights Templar also had that power. They were never going to give up this control. Crypto has only lived this long because it was a fantastic way to launder money. Now that block chain analysis has advanced to a point where crypto is not the cloak it used to be, the rich and powerful no longer have a purpose for it. The digital currency portion of crypto is definitely the future, but it will not be run by those with the most servers.
But working in the fields doing manual labor is what makes population explosions. It is crassly more a matter of economics. Kids are liabilities in urban and highly educated sections and an asset in rural manual labor situations. Urban vs rural has basically always seen that through different means.
> You can absolutely argue against this. It's called automation.

You're viewing it from a myopic production-focused viewpoint. Whereas the problem is our consumption-led economic order and its reliant on adding an ever increasing number of consumers.

Compared to young people:

A) Machines do not consume goods and trinkets. Western economies are based on consumption, not production.

B) Machines do not pay taxes, making it harder and harder for the state to pay for the welfare of ageing populations.

C) Automation simply doesn't work for service-focused work. Otherwise there wouldn't be record number of job openings and labor shortages in the US right now.
That could be true. But it could be like weed where Human brains have receptors for Cannbanoids but they don't do much without the help of weed.
Hey ed, this is Ram, the author of the post.
In the context of Infrastructure SaaS, a data plane is the system that is the infrastructure that you provide as service. For example, let us say you are building a company that provides Postgres as a service. In this case, Postgres is your data plane. Typically, your users will want the Postgres to be deployed in a specific region or cloud provider.They would run queries against the Postgres cluster.

Control plane is the central lifecycle management system that helps provide all the SaaS experience for your Infra SaaS application, manages the metadata for your application and also pushes this information to all the data planes. Example of lifecycle management operations could be creating an user, a new organization, provisioning your data plane in a specific region, deleting a cluster etc.

The data plane is your product that you want to sell to your customers and control plane is the central system that helps you to make your product work in a self serve way with your customers.

This example can also be mapped to internal use cases. Many companies manage their own infrastructure internally and end up having to build a central control plane to manage all the different infrastructure that they provide as a service to their developers. Hope this helps.
As a grug-brained developer, I love the spirit of this, but it's kinda hard to read. Maybe the author can publish an English translation? :)
Not really comparable at all. Instagram already had videos and stories. Twitter has had no form of long form at all. Even still Instagram user growth is in the tank. Based on this product demo in the gif, it won't be competing with Substack or Medium anytime soon.
Security is an afterthought in docker, deploy first questions later the dirty harry way. I learned lots about dockers lack of defense while trying to harden my instances and questioned why some of the options weren't enabled by default (--cap-drop=all and --security-opt=no-new-privileges and userns remap) other than exposing bad dockerfiles practices.
Anything authenticated with SSO can be accessed by the SSO provider since they're able to approve any authorization, which means they can just log into all your stuff.

So e.g. if you use "log in with Google" on a web site, Google now has access to your account too (if they behaved badly or were compromised).

Spreading SSO auth everywhere gives the SSO provider login access to absolutely everything you have.
So, someone should put all of the free and open source software at risk (if the "we guarantee nothing" part of their license doesn't hold ground for them it holds ground for no one) because you want to attack the ASF for not doing what you want? What a great plan.
THE...

...more interesting part of this article for the people arguing against it is THE granting of THE Marc Jacobs trademark, as that one is not restricted to the athletic market.
This is very lazily researched, a few minutes in google will give you pretty clear confirmation that he did in fact use several contracted ghostwriters. This was brought up by Scholastic publishing as evidence of breach of contract when they sued Parachute Press back in 1999. See this link for the court filings [0], note here that RL's representatives do not deny the claim that the ghostwriters were employed by RL but instead that the use of them did not suffice to constitute breach of contract.

So he has essentially via his legal representation confirmed that to varying degrees he did not in fact write many of the books past the first 20. Instead, this filing shows that he often wrote outlines which he then passed onto other contractors. Scholastic claims here that they lost substantial amounts of revenue because the ghostwriters did not write stories as well as RL.

[0] https://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/NYSComDiv/Oct02/600512-...
the US objectively loses a massive amount of foreign policy leverage by not being the largest manufacturer anymore, this is undeniable and obvious when you see how many countries are openly not sticking with the US with regards to Ukraine because they can just side with China, Russia, and India.

The US has gone from 40% of global GDP in the 60s to less than 20%, they've lost relative power when it comes to global issues as a result of that.
Is just reasonable association enough? Doesn't have to be unique, or distinguishable in some way? After all, if you watch nationally televised Football games, tons of players say they're from "the" X university. Thomas Davis says "The" University of Georgia here, for example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYoW8J9wRrI&t=20s (20 sec in).

Davis would later go on to play for The Washington Football Team.
> “A lot of people are like, ‘How, morally, can you do this job?’”

How did people's moral compasses get so corrupt that instead of believing stealing is immoral, they believe that stopping other people from stealing is immoral?
Gated communities, like Brazil
Burden of Proof
Repurposing an old Android phone as a web server
I doubt there will be many there during the football World Cup, you Unmensch.
So busting people who are shoplifting items that they either need to survive or items that they can sell to survive to say, pay rent, because our capitalist system has shit on them and left them with no options

That prosocial goal?
grug think grugposting is part of the charm
> The problem isn't that nobody has designed or created such a system: it's that they're not very popular.

This assertion would be more interesting if there were more visible attempts. I haven't found anything on github I can deploy to moderate a channel via any kind of public-governance or other models. Can you?

Personally, I think we've done very little experimentation, and the gerontocratic rulers we dwell under generally would prefer staying in tight control. You talk about popularity, but popular for who? Even if some kind of democratic governance gained mass popularity, how many mods would be willing to hand over their long held control over channels/sites?
says here that tosu has been using it since 2005, and only pursued trademark after marc jacobs filed for one in 2019
The Worst Thing on Earth (2021)
The article strangely seems like it's framing the entire industry/profession of loss prevention in a negative light. Hopefully everyone realizes the more retail theft a store experiences, the higher prices become for those of us who pay... and the more likely a store is to shut down if theft becomes too prevalent.

I'm not here defending a subreddit I've never visited but in general, those in the loss prevention industry don't have the time or context to evaluate if a given shoplifter is or isn't deserving of intervention based on the shoplifter's circumstances. Loss prevention is there to prevent loss - not make moral judgements.
So in the same comment, you mentioned skipping most of an entire season and being uninterested in the most prominent message the show is delivering, and then you ask if you're missing something?

Yes! You missed things because you skipped them.

I don't love the show or think it makes that much sense, but this is an idiotic post.
so, uhm, before Docker, what was the one-liner that allowed me to get a ubuntu, fedora, nixos, ... shell automatically ?
I guess either:

A) The most senior programmers simply don't visit Stack Overflow that much

B) The more senior you get, the less actual programming your work entails, and you again visit Stack Overflow.

Or something similar.
Docker was definitely a fork in the road that led to unhappiness. I was tracking linux containers for several years (specifically, with the goal of doing cross-machine container migration) and they were doing great. Then docker came along and... pretty much every experience Ive had with it involves realizing core decisions were made by people who had no experience and we're all paying for it, long-term.
Yeah if a doctor said “I don’t really care about my patients’ lives. I just like the power of being able to prevent death”

I really think that’s perfectly fine
Im pretty sure that the majority of twitter users has never posted a tweet, think 80/20 rule.

See this link, although its not exactly what im looking for:
https://www.socialmediatoday.com/news/new-study-shows-that-2...
What I find amazing is that some retail operators apparently expect low-wage workers making like $12/hour to physically accost shoplifters or try to detain them at the exit door, at risk of getting punched in the face, bear sprayed, shot, stabbed, etc.

They're not getting paid anywhere near enough for that level of risk.
Copying my other comment here. There definitely is a moral issue

>busting people who are shoplifting items that they either need to survive or items that they can sell to survive to say, pay rent, because our capitalist system has shit on them and left them with no options

Property rights should not be above human life. Full stop.
> OpenBSD doesn't support Bluetooth, but you can see this as a security feature

> You may think OpenBSD slow performance could hit your productivity

> Maybe your favorite software is proprietary and will not be provided for OpenBSD, then your provider is entirely at fault...

Sales really isn't for everyone....lol

Also I haven't heard great things about their mailing list. Maybe this has changed, but they're in no shape to replace commercial quality technical support.
Our telco converted all its infra to FTTN via fiber. So, I've actually have fiber connection up to the front of my building, then it's terminated and distributed via VDSL to the street.

I have a 50/8 mbps connection at home and, it gives all the performance it can give. The telco keeps the speeds a bit higher to handle VDSL overhead, so we have a real 50/8 mbps IP connection at premises.

I'd rather not rewire my home and use existing equipment (which can handle 350mpbs), rather than bringing in fragile fiber into the home.
If they prevent my death, I don't care why.
Containers absolutely existed before. THere was a long-running project, I think it was LXC but there may have been one before that, which was doing great work fixing all the underlying problems before the technology went exponential.
I inferred the blogger meant quality suffered when Stine was spread thin, which I'd agree with as an avid Goosebumps fan of that era.