skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The main page [0] shows you awesome demos, but also its weaknesses in the very first example. It doesn't encode the url encoded body properly:

> body: `text=${text}`,

So it breaks if the text contains a '&' and even allows parameter injection to the call of the 3rd party service. Isn't that critical on a sentiment analysis API, but could result in actual security holes.

I hope the users won't blindly use the generated code without review.
These mistakes can be so subtle, nobody even noticed them when they put them on the front page of the product.

[0]: https://github.com/features/copilot/
I tried that and the question that popped up was "what if I don't pay anymore? will I not be able to use it then?". It kind of turned people away, and that's why I change the copy.

If an app has a longer lifetime than a year, and I hope it does, then you'd have to resume the subscription to get the updates (bugs and security). It's the way the perpetual-fallback license works. There are plenty of products (table plus, jumpstart rails) and large companies (jetbrains) that practice this model. I wish there was an easier way of shipping those updates without a subscription.
Despite the unfortunate reason for the limitation, as long as the author intends to present a fictional story I think allegorical stories about injustice actually do more to convey the message. There's a lot of fiction that just feels like the writer had tunnel vision on a contemporary issue and forgot to flesh out enough of a story to make it feel like more than a thinly-veiled lecture. Even when I agree wholeheartedly with the message, it can be agonizing to watch.

Just a general thought though, Peele is a good enough creator that I don't expect him to fall into that trap.
You must only work with languages that you just invented.
Some of these are standard, a few are genuinely clever, but many are bad designs and I'd never let someone tape them out in production.

2. Connecting the body terminal to something other than the highest voltage is dangerous and we rarely do it except in switches and diff pairs. We'd never do something like this. You can't even connect the nmos body to the gate unless you're using "deep" nwells which is an expensive process step that most people seem to avoid these days

3. I hate it when foundries do this in their standard cell libraries. Its an extremely weak pulldown and I've seen problems in production caused by using this structure. You can make a much better structure with a third transistor and positive feedback where devices still aren't connected to the supplies, but you get a stronger pull.

4-6. These are current-mode logic, but you never see them made this way because they're slow and high power. Instead they're usually made with a tail current source on the "bottom" and resistors on top, which keeps all transistors in a faster operating region. They get used often in RF clock dividers.

16. Again, connecting the body is dangerous, especially when the potential is somewhat unknown, but this does get used in extremely low power/low voltage applications.

I didn't get through all of them, but it made me wonder - with two 4-terminal devices, how many possible configurations can you actually make?
I've been using Copilot non-stop on every hobby project I have ever since they've let me in (2021/07/13) and I am honestly flabbergasted they think it's worth 10$/mo. My experience using it till this day is the following:

- It's an amazing all-rounder autocomplete for most boilerplate code. Generally anything that someone who's spent 5 minutes reading the code can do, Copilot can do just as well.

- It's terrible if you let it write too much. The biggest problem I've had is not that it doesn't write correctly, it's that it think it knows how and then produce good looking code at a glance but with wrong logic.

- Relying on its outside-code knowledge is also generally a recipe for disaster: e.g. I'm building a Riichi Mahjong engine and while it knows all the terms and how to put a sentence together describing the rules, it absolutely doesn't actually understand how "Chii" melds work

- Due to the licensing concerns I did not use CoPilot at all in work projects and I haven't felt like I was missing that much. A friend of mine also said he wouldn't be allowed to use it.

You can treat it as a pair programming session where you're the observer and write an outline while the AI does all the bulk work (but be wary), but at what point does it become such a better experience to justify 10$/mo? I don't understand if I've been using it wrong or what.
I mean waking feeling more rested in the morning. The typical stategy for waking up tired is to go to bed earlier, which is less time in the evening to do other things.
I never thought about all of this in relation to animal cognition and I really like the point about animals, mostly because we have been recently learning that animals have far greater mental ability than we like to admit.

And I'm amused that at some point we would have considered someone actively an idiot for believing animals have complex stuff going on up there. Makes me wonder if that guy was tricked by a dog once or something and never really got over it!
There's no shifting going on, what users put in is what OSM stores, nothing more, nothing less.

As to why, I wasn't in the room when that decision was made, but the design philosophy of the OSM data model is to leave things as open-ended as possible while still being practical. An object's attributes can be any arbitrary combination of key/value pairs. There's conventions, but no enforced standards. My best guess is that the precision for longitude / latitude is an outcome of that same design philosophy. Back in 2004 when OSM started and all of this was defined, there was no way <10cm coordinate precision was going to be meaningful, but now you see use cases where it may be, like indoor mapping (see for example https://openlevelup.net/?l=0#19/48.87598/2.32630)
It's not copying open source code. If you learn an algorithm to balance a binary tree from reading GPL code, and then go use that algorithm in your own closed-source project, with your own variables and types and context, are you breaking GPL? You're not copying the code. Just because you learned about it from reading GPL code doesn't mean that whenever you write tree balancing code from now until the end of time, all that code has to be GPL'd.

Copilot learns the "shape" of code. Common patterns and algorithms, etc. You can't copyright an algorithm.
It seems unfortunately clear that generative ML as typically practiced falls under fair use of even the most restrictive licenses or lack thereof (e.g. a training set including disney movies without disney’s permission). Some people say that’s great and it’s legal hooray, but I would love it if the law caught up and added requirements to the models trained this way. If you benefit from other people’s stuff without their permission then you ought to have to give back in some way.
Same experience: https://i.imgur.com/Z9BrQGn.png

I don't hold the in browser POC at fault for the trained model (but am amused by the efficacy of the model).
I believe the hard problem will simply disappear some day, when enough is explained about the brain and perception. It's just a feature of the universe that we have a cohesive private state of affairs that is our individual consciousness, but that is unequivocally tied to our brains and our perception system. It's probably not hard at all. It's weird and mysterious, but not hard.
If I search for a random fact, Google will show me data from a random unfortunate website, saving me from a click.

That is how Google provably scrapes sites in addition to crawling them.
Thank you. I see. I guess I'm talking about the playground whereas I guess you're talking about Lexical itself and its API. It would be really nice to have a demo of this working with the API in the playground.
Yeah, I know rhetoric isn't about reading, exactly—I'm looking at the cheerful green spine of a Loeb edition of Aristotle's Art of Rhetoric on my shelf right this moment—but there seems to be a general deficiency in the ability to even follow, let alone construct, arguments or lines of reasoning. Often, bare comprehension of meaning is severely lacking, before we even get to interpreting and evaluating a text.

I mean simply that reading well is a distressingly uncommon skill; that one may hardly hope to write well without that foundation; and that there's a great deal of overlap between reading comprehension, and evaluating oral argument or presentation. I agree that instruction in rhetoric is lacking, but universities, and certainly high schools, aren't even doing a great job of ensuring graduates are skilled at more fundamental aspects of communication. However, perhaps that's backwards, and more robust rhetorical instruction would fill in some of the gaps in reading ability. I wouldn't mind seeing it attempted, since the current approach doesn't seem to be very effective.
Wow that's crazy, since I'd imagine SoCs to be the most vulnerable to bitflips.
Isn't rust 10+yrs old now? With 1.0 being 7 years ago? Feels like it's a language people like to talk about but not actually use for anything serious
Okay, so having the contract wasn't the key factor.

Instead, the proper interpretation of sam_goody's comment requires us knowing ... what, exactly? When the last Thiokol employee touched the the engine? When Morton Thiokol made the first design change? (https://history.nasa.gov/rogersrep/v1ch6.htm says there was a design change when 'new Randolph putty was eventually substituted for the old putty in the summer of 1983', but that started in 1982, before the merger.)

So, when exactly was that?

What decided the moment when we can say the SRB motor units were something was Morton Thiokol's first attempt at rocket building, and not Thiokol's?
> ...it's minblowing and the biggest productivity gain in years...

I wouldn't go that far. It's a pretty big help in repetitive/boiler plate code and it's pretty good at intelligently transforming data, but I've found it gets in the way more often than it helps for every other case.
They intentionally opted in to sharing their work with you in a certain way. If someone copy pasted stack overflow answers and made them into a book, which they sold for money, that would be wrong.
Thats like blaming the hammer for breaking.

BGP is just a tool, it would be something else to do the same purpose.
Clickhouse-local is incredible. It does the best of any similar tool I've benchmarked. But the reason I took it out of the linked benchmarks in OP's post is because it's 2+GB. That's a massive binary. It's the whole server. I'm not sure you want to be distributing this all over the place in general. It's just not in the same category IMO. Disclaimer: I build another tool that does similar things.
> I consider Hare’s lack of a package manager to be an important security feature.

Hare’s package manager is curl|bash? How is that a security feature?
Wikipedia adds “A notable feature of JUCE when compared to other similar frameworks is its large set of audio functionality; this is because JUCE was originally developed as a framework for Tracktion, an audio sequencer, before being split off into a standalone product.”
Lots of activity in this space recently, there are more at https://github.com/paladin-t/fantasy
No, more extreme fluctuations (that on average end up being warmer) do not make crops tenable in areas where they previously were not.
You're not going to be able to hire someone senior without telling them how much they are making. This trick only works on college students and people who are really passionate.

Startups have a lot of toxic expectations around keeping those term sheets secret for no good reason.
Alien 1: "Should we invite the humans to our galactic convention?"

Alien 2: "You mean the creatures who sent a scout robot to their neighboring planet and immediately left all their trash behind, before it even landed?"

Alien 1: "Yeah, you're right, we don't need that kind littering in the convention center. Fuck them."
Unless something has changed, the training data also includes copyleft code, not just permissively licensed code
> Also feels kind of icky to train on open source projects and then charge for the output.

How would you feel if they just provided the software without the model, assuming you could train it yourself on open-source code in an instant?
And then you have an automated checker which tells you FastAverageCase isn't used..
Those authors are getting views and imaginary internet points for their work, which is often times more valuable than money to programmer types. It's not like people write SO posts for a salary.
You need to acquire rights for copy/pasting my code and selling it in a book, for example.
I like it. Its better than naming it something with "rails" embedded like "trailsblazer".
lsof supports machine-readable mode:

lsof -i ":$1" -Fp | tr -d p
I've been working on four projects in the last 12 months. I helped starting one of them in 2017 (Elixir / Phoenix.) I inherited a RoR one in 2012 and two Django ones in 2016 and 2019.

Given the long life of projects that make money one doesn't start many of them but being able to show something in a short time is important. It helps to focus on features and not to get lost in architectural yak shaving.
There's a lot to unpack here. College is not synonymous with education. I'm anti-college insofar as I feel that it is a net-negative for society, and greatly so. For the vast majority, college is a means to an end, a way to receive some training at best, or mere credentialing at worst, to work for some entity (mostly for-profit corporations). Does society need this to function, is it even desirable?

The university system is full of cons and frauds. Anyone that gives that system money is helping to perpetuate the system.
Heads up: cube2222 is the original author of this benchmark. :) I copied it and Simon copied my copy of it.
The statistics disagree. Men on average have sex earlier[1] and with more people during their lifetime[2][3] and a higher percentage of people find theres negative stigma surrounding women having a high number of partners than men having a low number[4].

1: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/key_statistics/s.htm#sexualact...
2: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/key_statistics/n.htm#numberlif...
3: https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/sexual-fantasies-our-mispercepti...
4: https://bespokesurgical.com/2021/06/24/sexual-history-by-sta...
Reporting on my own experience, I got access to Copilot a few days after it was announced and am currently not expected to pay for it.

I started a project that currently has 9.4k stars (now mostly maintained by someone else), and still maintain a project that has 2.5k stars.
Ironically TLS is not suited to TCP. TLS is record-based, and the stream-based TCP doesn’t have record boundaries.

TLS-over-TCP solves this by sending TLS records with a type-and-length byte header. QUIC uses UDP which is more record based, and sends TLS records encapsulated in QUIC packets.
You are discussing others as generalizations, and my argument is that our tendency to attach ourselves to discussions of generalizations itself is the thing that intrudes as it is the absolute opposite of having sex. Fucking is an act that takes place entirely in the concrete present. Our ability to continuously dissociate into intangible abstractions has made us lose touch with our bodies. The discussion of podcasts and identities and all these other archetypes and mediums that divorce us from our physicality are ground zero of this loss.
With how much data cloudflare has access to and how the market for data is, I don't believe it for a second that they can't correlate connections even if what you say is true
Also, $10/mo is not so bad but I am not in the place right now for more subscriptions. I am in the process of stopping several at the moment.
Proposal: Torch.js, a JavaScript front end for PyTorch
Buy her a Quest for her birthday, I’m just trying to provide helpful suggestions here. I just use the included spacer and it works fine with my glasses and is quick to change out give that a shot.
They didn’t apologize about the direction the pro macs were going a few years back but they certainly listened and made amends for it with the recent Pro line and MacBook Pro enhancements
I've also been using this for months, and would not pay for it. I think i might be getting it for free actually as I haven't been asked to pay yet.

I came to the same conclusion as you, you can see comments I made elsewhere in this thread. I'm not thrilled with it.
Hmm, that bike looks very much like Swapfiets' "Deluxe 7" model, which has a 7-gear hub, so not a single speed! The gears also explain why there are three wires leading to the handlebar (2 for the brakes + 1 for the gears).

Nevertheless, the lowest gear on that bike is still not much help on a steep ascend like this.
It sits between your router and your endpoints (computers, laptops).

It can connect directly via ethernet cable or broadcast it's own WiFi SSID's to which you can connect.

You configure it to always connect to VPN of your choice using OpenVPN or WireGuard protocols.

Then you may connect to this device SSID and your traffic always be routed via VPN connection.
This is way better, secure and more reliable than "VPN software" or "VPN apps" solutions.

Not sure if i answered your question?
Linked at the end of the article is the short (15 minutes maybe) self-test: https://speed.readwise.io/.

Curious what results people here got. I got 23% faster with BR but I couldn't tell if I was just trying harder.
If you're making software just for your own use, you're right. But most people who make software do distribute it.
> Also, we're back to the fundamental problem

Is it really a problem?
Maybe a starlink subscription
Because cutting regulations would require some uncomfortable changes. You would have to tax land and excess liquidity. Nobody wants that. Land ownership redistributes wealth to landowners. Withholding liquidity from the market causes economic downturns and speculative activity.

If you solved those two things a lot of politics would become redundant.
There are a few videos on YouTube where Serling talks with groups of aspiring writers. He is quite passionate about writing and storytelling. He also smokes incessantly, which lead to his untimely death at the age of 50.
Status pages lie to us/are generally inaccurate for a bunch of reasons. Here's just a few of them: https://metrist.io/blog/why-status-pages-are-lying-to-you-an...
A Short Trip
To be fair, it's not as much user-friendly as it is simple, and simple tends to be easier to understand.

For example, if it was more user-friendly, it could have links to jump between root comments, because right now very popular top comments tend to accumulate most interactions, and scrolling down several pages to find the next root thread requires effort.
There's nothing in the essay that said he didn't ask, and that she wasn't a willing participant, doing the work because she loves him. (And why wouldn't your wife love proofing your work if she loves you? Just curious if she's told you either way.)
If the copilot users then distribute the source they got from it, they are at that point violating copyright.

E.g., if I take that Disney movie, incorporate it into my own movie, and distribute it, then I'm also violating copyright.
Dangerous fantasy: Gold, Bitcoin won't help you find freedom outside government
Most "permissive" licenses still require attribution.
>All training data is available under permissive licenses. Assuming you're not overfitting on specific code sequences (which would require attribution - and yes, I'm aware Copilot is not immune to this problem and it needs fixing), I'd say this is fair play.

Copilot isn't honoring the license, so why does it matter whether it was under a restrictive or permissive license?
Copilot has been fun, but I don't think it's really increased my productivity. To me it seems like it's not quite ready, but I'm excited to see what it's like in 5 years.
It would. Yet there is no promising tech in this field. Hydrogen is supported only to draw support away from EVs.

If hydrogen becomes inexpensive to produce, it will by by way of solar power used to generate it.

It will never be easy to store. Hydrogen is the smallest element, and can move through solid objects over time. It is violently explosive. You think these EV fires you see all the time are bad? They're nothing compared to gasoline fires. And gasoline fires are nothing compared to a hydrogen explosion.
Fintech dark pattern that issues a loan without confirmation
Implementing Role-Based Access Control with Warrant and Postman
Okay, however I have yet to see any crypto project that even comes close to solving borderless money transfers, although a lot of them claim to.

This is unfortunate as that market is ripe for disruption
i could concentrate myself better on the regular text

with Bionic Reading i had to re-read some sentences until i've processed them correctly

note that i'm not a native speaker

personal result:

Bionic Reading: 234 WPM

Literata: 262 WPM

"You read 11% faster with Literata"
> Un the middle of the range both MOSFETs are likely conducting, effectively producing a dead short!

This is exactly the configuration described in the CD4069UBE datasheet, where single stages of the hex inverter are biased to the midpoint with a feedback resistor. This turns them into a surprisingly good programmable inverting amplifier, rather like an opamp without a non-inverting input.
I wish computers could stop us from making these kinds of mistakes without turning into Skynet.
Grifters Tried to Pass Off My Free Custom Email Service as Their Own NFT Project
But you dont say how much the subscription is.
The Middle Class of OSS
I thought I hated jira, then I joined a company that uses Pivotal tracker.
You can do all of those things outside of University though. I think you actually made a very valid argument against your point.

University is beneficial for access to laboratory infrastructure that you otherwise couldn't obtain on your own without incurring significant cost. A good - albeit extreme - example is the nuclear reactor at Reed College. University also provides you with resources to ask questions on observations or thoughts around what you experiment with in the lab. It's a great sandbox and gives you flexibility to determine what you want to do in life before you fully invest into it. This is only true to the extent in which you're not pouring thousands of dollars down the drain at college to learn you just wanted to weld shit together. Conversely I think trade school is where you've discovered what you want to do and you go learn how to do it with peak proficiency in a controlled setting.
Maybe you are working with a different stack and problems :)
I always pictured eventually Augmented Reality would have artistic overlays, reinterpretations of the world, and this sure does seem like a feasible implementation of that.
>But going onsite or remote interviewing for 4 hours is more reasonable?

I would never subject myself to a 4 hour interview either. What information can a company get in 4 hours they can't get in 1 hour? Seems like a massive waste of time done by a hiring process created by people that don't know any better.

If you want seniors to even consider you, you need to ditch all that garbage and save it for people fresh in the field.

Now if you are willing to pay double market rates you'll get more seniors willing to go through that, but if you are paying "market" rates and "good" benefits, you're not going to get the interest.
Traffic lights fitted with Pong games for pedestrians to play while they wait
are you saying that this news is disinformation?