skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I guess you could easily make the background more gray during rendering by using the depth buffer, since this is a stylized 3D scene, no?
That's funny. I looked at the essay for a pub date and completely missed the HN title. D'oh.
KJV is conservative methodists and baptists and high church anglicans. There's also plenty of ESV and NIV kicking anout.

Native english speakers often agree the KJV is beautiful in writing and speech.
It's not that capturing carbon and then releasing it again is good. What's good is that the liquid fuel (made from green energy plus captured carbon) can be used in existing cars, ships and aircraft.

There's more info in the Wikipedia article I linked above. "In 2021, Audi announced that it was working on e-diesel and e-gasoline projects.

"By 2021, the European Federation for Transport and Environment advised the aviation sector was needing e-kerosene to be deployed as it could substantially reduce the climate impact of aviation."
KJV is in the public domain.
Kim Dotcom (the estranged founder of MEGA) has confirmed this and claims the backdoors were added purposefully due to the new owner's plea deal with CCP authorities.

https://twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/1539426607978680321
Ouch $17 AUD/month for a single user!
that archaic language is what people have agreed upon; getting that agreement is not trivial. From an arts point of view, I would say that poetic words with multiple meanings, start a sort of mental process that includes questions and "reaching inward to find meaning"
Samsung expected to announce mass production of 3nm chip next week
No, both types of flying are very important to "real" pilots.

The kind of flying you're doing (basically) is called VFR, for visual flight rules. You keep an eye on your instruments of course but a lot of the flying is getting done just by looking out the window.

While a trained pilot certainty CAN fly on instruments alone (which is a separate certification on top of your regular license), no sane pilot would choose to ignore what is happening outside if visibility is decent. GOOD pilots like to have all the information they can, at all times.
It's almost as if YC and HN users have entriely different incentives and opinions. Shocking.
Well, soap operas mostly had a very specific audience who could be counted on to watch most days and didn’t have a lot of intricate plotting.
>... but I trust the company to uphold certain values, especially around humanistic principles.

You mean like, "Don't be evil"?

/s
Complete marketing PR. Probably you should be declaring where do you work when posting PR comments
Those -cmd are actually unnecessary, you can do

sqlite3 :memory: '.mode csv' '.import taxi.csv taxi' \
'SELECT passenger_count, COUNT(*), AVG(total_amount) FROM taxi GROUP BY passenger_count'
Well, what we have here is the unique snowflake syndrome or not invented here syndrome. At this point I’ve lost all hope that we’ll see a single payer system in the USA in my lifetime.
I think the point is a criticism of organizational bearucracy becoming an end in itself. Any organization can probably end up here, not all are at that point and some may have control to prevent bureaucrats from gaining total control. I don't have good sources but I imagine something along use lines is the common criticism of politicians that they become pure political operatives, disconnected from their constituents actual needs. I imagine an alternative to this would be sortition where randomizing the office holder theoretically minimizes their ability to perpetuate the institution for the sake of its existence.
It's the scandals on stuff like Albendazole that make y'all evil, not the cancer drugs. I mean the FDA forces us to live like we are in some Soviet style dystopia. Some ancient commodity antiparasite drugs that are cheap as salt -- so abundant that people literally use them as a drench on livestock -- can only be bought from one or two approved marketers (manufacturers), through only approved distribution channels, only at approved retailers, after unnecessary high-skilled laborers press some buttons, and only after you have the right script from the right gatekeepers.
That’s the point: without knowing that time is an important feature your ML model will come to the wrong conclusion.
Mintlify's Doc Writer – Inverse Copilot (Generate Documentation from Code)
"what matters today is linking an ad to a transaction, and Apple has positioned itself to have perfect knowledge of both, even as it denies others the same opportunity."

Ads will eat Apple alive.

Apple can't be pro-privacy & build the best panopticon.
If what's presented in the blog is actual configuration that's very much a junos device and definitely has the ability to have commit with confirm, auto rollback, and commit history. Not using it is more of an issue with the automation, as they said.

(Which is an issue with the /automation/ defaults. I've learned enough to do commit confirm, but by default ansible does a hard commit.)
I think this is incorrect; I have seen GWP20 numbers like 38, eg here[1], or lower numbers for GWP100. Do you have a citation?

[1] https://www.greenbiz.com/article/inside-misconception-hydrog...
>> anti-science stuff that gets thrown around these days

It wasn't just anti-science but deliberate attempts to stop Obamacare, the ONLY initiative ever attempted to fix the US healthcare system. Then came the Republicans to stop it.

https://www.heritage.org/health-care-reform/commentary/why-t...

IMO, the Pacific coast states need to reject national health care, create a health-care pact between states that slowly grows larger by adding new states. If another state doesn't want to join, then, so be it.

Enough of splintered policies that change across state lines. Reduce health care insurance costs by allowing continued and universal care to states that elect this policy. The strength of change is in the states themselves, not the federal level.

https://www.gov.ca.gov/2020/04/13/california-oregon-washingt...
The same logic can be applied to literally anything in a capitalist society. If the current way of doing things employs people, we can’t possibly do it any other way.
> I don't think that precludes ASD from being a useful diagnostic category, though. behavioral therapists don't need to know your genotype to help you cope with sensory overload.

It is possible to have "sensory overload" – even severe problems with it – yet not have enough of the other symptoms of ASD to meet its diagnostic criteria. How do behavioural therapists treat sensory overload in a person without ASD? Pretty much in the same way that they treat sensory overload in people with ASD! Conversely, it is possible to meet the ASD diagnostic criteria, and yet have no sensory issues needing treatment – such people exist too.

That's the thing – received wisdom justifies the clinical use of diagnoses as useful in treatment planning - but if you subject that received wisdom to scrutiny (too rarely done), it doesn't hold up very well. Almost all treatments in psychology/psychiatry/etc are (at best) symptom-specific not diagnosis-specific – almost all symptoms occur in multiple diagnoses, and many diagnoses have no one essential symptom. If person A has diagnosis B with symptom C – their treatment for symptom C will often be very similar, even identical, to the treatment of that same symptom in some other person who has completely different diagnoses instead.

> schizophrenia probably works the same way, but you still prescribe antipsychotics regardless

The same point applies to medications – medications don't really treat disorders, they treat symptoms. Antipsychotics are used to treat psychosis – which is a symptom which occurs not only in schizophrenia spectrum disorders, but very commonly seen in mood disorders as well (bipolar disorder with psychotic features, depressive psychosis), and (less commonly) can occur as a symptom of many more. Yet, whatever their diagnosis may be, a person with psychotic symptoms is highly likely to be prescribed an antipsychotic.

Added to that, you can also be prescribed an antipsychotic without having any psychotic symptoms, since various antipsychotics are FDA-approved for treating non-psychotic conditions, including anxiety, behavioural issues in children with autism/ASD, bipolar disorder, depression and Tourette's syndrome, along with various non-specific symptoms such as "agitation", "behavioural problems" (ADHD, ODD, DMDD, conduct disorder, personality disorders), and "hyperactivity" [0] – to say nothing of their very widespread off-label use.

[0] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK84656/
> Kind of off-topic but, why does the angloworld keep using a translation of the bible that's written in an almost "archaic" English

Not almost, it was deliberately archaic when written.

But also...the “angloworld” as a whole doesn't.
This is one of the only instances where it's ok to ask: AAAAUUUUUGH how do I get these freaky bugs out of my head!?!?!?
Have you seen the comments when one of Paul Graham’s essays is posted?

Isn’t it kind of strange to be hanging on a VC funded forum that supports crypto?
Apple controls all commerce via apple payment processor.

Not even facebook has that kind of power.
JavaScript is popular because of browsers not because it is in any way a good language. Name another popular language with half its quirks.

WASM will eventually spell the end of JavaScript’s hegemony as it becomes easier to build web apps in other languages. So good luck Deno. You’re betting on a sinking ship.
Uh, how about in the primary language(s) used in the market where the detergent is sold? The other text on the bottle is already localized.
Lines are buried in big cities, in smaller towns the lines are running from house to house, using roofs instead of poles
Is this not expected, what with inflation where it is?
People have said the same thing about sh.

And neither bash nor sh are that great, so no reason to put down the idea that they shouldn't be the "default"
IMo, The ballooning costs in healthcare are not from not knowing how to reduce the costs or make the system more efficient. There is entrenched interests/ businesses that will lose 100s of billions if it were replaced or shifted. They absolutely will not let it happen. Spending a few billions to buy politicians is justifiable for them. That is the main reason we are in this mess and will always be. May be I am too pessimistic, but Google, Amazon put together is not enough to change it
> - Recording screen or window, while recording desktop audio and mic at the same time.

FFMPEG alone (well, with the pulseaudio loopback) can do this. It can also stream to stuff like twitch with no extra software. OBS is great but I feel like it's overkill for a lot of what people do.
Static typing is machine and human readable documentation that is tightly integrated in the development loop. Like all documentation, it requires devs to spend a bit more time upfront create.

In large constant systems, code is read more times it is written. Documentation is usually worth the pain.

In small, transitory, or experimental systems, documentation may not be worth the additional burden.
I turned off auto-suggest and that made a huge difference. Now I'll use it when I know I'm doing something repetitive that it'll get easily, or if I'm not 100% sure what I want to do and I'm curious what it suggests. This way I get the help without having it interrupt my thoughts with its suggestions.
I'm fairly sure Tito comes from "autito", the diminutive form of auto (car), and Tita from "camionetita" (camioneta; truck). If I'm right about that then a Tite model is unlikely as it would break the logic.
I'm not in the know, but what little I know of science history tells me that entrenchment is a regular occurrence in the sciences, going back to Copernicus and Co.

I suppose capitalism has fueled it to one extent or another. Depending on your outlook, that could be a good thing or a bad thing.

In our defense, at least we're not burning people at the stake for it anymore.
I use this for Uber in the third world. Really helpful.
>The history of the internet is repeatedly reduced to the story of the singular Arpanet. But BBSs were just as important—if not more.

I mean, even the sub-heading feels wrong to me. Arpanet and BBSs are both a key part of the history of the internet. I'm 35 and both have been discussed, in a historical context, ad nauseam my entire life.
Please write a blog post detailing your setup.

I’d love to do something like this but could really use some hand holding for the setup part.
Yes, but 14% of jobs is a huge number. Healthcare is one of the biggest, if not the biggest, employment sectors.
That is not the sentiment that is parroted in mainstream media.
Specifically, "the net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it" is a statement of John Gilmore and originally referred to Usenet (not the Internet).

In its most literal sense, it refers to the fact that Usenet tried to achieve reliability by replicating a complete set of recent articles by a flood fill-like algorithm, regardless of the specific path that they took to reach an individual node. Therefore, if you deleted an individual article in one place, it would still propagate elsewhere, even if it took a longer route to reach a given destination.

It also has a more figurative interpretation in which net users try to maintain connectivity and the free flow of information, and try to find workarounds when either is disrupted.
Quitting a job before you have another one is stupid.

Sorry, but if I had started my job search even a few weeks later, I would not have gotten my current thing. The economy has been in a free fall lately and I caught the last hiring wave before both my previous company and my new one announced hiring freezes.

So if I had quit and delayed a bit, I could have ended up unemployed, instead of with a raise. Quitting puts you in the position of disadvantage, so never do that.
Is this much different than a human artist being inspired by countless artists that came before them?

I can’t give a great painting example, but in the world of music, should The Beatles get a cut from every single band they influenced, which is basically all of them.

It seems like of artists went down this road the AI developers could come up with a pretty strong defense.
Interesting. Not sure about Ford, just seems to be noted as lithium ion:

https://transportation.report/ev/2022-ford-f150-pickup-light...
There was a brief period where BBSs also offered various gateway services into the Internet a long with the normal BBS services like doors. I received my first ever email address from a huge local BBS back in the early early 90s by paying a token fee every month. I had nobody I knew with email addresses until a few years later so it was kind of pointless, but it did work.

On a larger scale, when AOL started offering internet services through their network is sort of the same thing until they eventually just become an ISP.
People don't refer to gold, or buying a house a "saving" either, but they definitely see it as safe haven values, and not as their money being "actively" invested (even as they do bear risks and are fiscally categorized as investments).

For people I talked to, beating inflation was their base goal.
Playacting as philosophy—enjoyable read though.
Their point is that they didn't need to own GitHub to build copilot—they could have used the public code regardless.
Cedexis now part of Citrix offers a multi-cdn product, that allows you to load balance between CDNs, check them out. I'm not sure who else is in that space, but in general it sounds like you want a multi-cdn strategy.
Because the King James Version (KJV) was so dominant for so long among English speakers that archaic language came to be associated with Holy Writ. Generations have been conditioned to think that scripture is supposed to sound old.

Now, lots of Christian denominations do favor more modern translations, but the KJV refuses to go away.

Fun fact from the church I grew up in (Mormonism): aside from the Bible and the Book of Mormon, Mormons have a book of scripture called Doctrine and Covenants, which contains revelations from God directly to Joseph Smith. But what's funny is that this book is also written in faux-Jacobean English. Smith didn't think it through!

The KJV was so dominant in 19th Century America that Smith (like most people probably) just assumed that if God spoke directly to us, he would use language that sounded like the Bible. So when he purported to write down the words of God, that's exactly what he made them sound like. He didn't think about the fact that the the KJV is written in Jacobean English because it was written in the Jacobean era, and that scripture only sounds old to our ears now because that translation has persisted for so long.

So today, lots of Christian churches are adopting newer translations of the Bible. But the Mormon church is stuck with the KJV forever because Joseph Smith established the tradition that that's how God sounds when he talks to us. We can't just produce a modern translation of the D&C because it's supposedly the primary source!
While I agree with the principle and overall conclusion I think you're probably confusing gates and transistors. While you can make a 2-input NAND gate on a breadboard using one transistor and some resistors, in a CMOS chip resistors are more expensive than transistors (and suck energy) so actually a 2-input NAND gate will use 4 transistors, a 3-input NAND will use 6 transistors etc.

You might be confusing LUTs and gates also.

Regardless, by the time you have a couple of KB of ITIM or icache or maybe 10 KB of code executed directly from flash, you're better off implementing C.

On anything running a real OS it's just ludicrous not to have C.
Faith by definition is believing without requiring proof! In fact, searching for proof requires your faith is not solid!
> the idea that the Internet was designed to route around damage

See, e.g. Baran's writings from 1964, about decentralization, fault tolerance, and survivability of packet switched networks and directly lead to the ARPANet and internet:
https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM3420.html

> shred of evidence I could find in favor of something like an ideology of decentralization

As to decentralization among many providers-- this only really comes into play in 1989, when BGP emerged, and the NSFNet began to connect regional networks and ISPs and internet exchanges began to flourish-- though you can find Baran writing in the late 1970's about the connection of multiple networks and ensuring that single providers or colluding groups of providers are not too powerful.

But it was a goal from the beginning. E.g. Pouzin, 1973:

"Actually, this last approach boils down to the construction of another network, and ultimate at that. ... This is not to say that a general internetwork agreement will never happen, but that it will happen gradually... This study attempts to put forward a realistic scheme allowing point to point message transfer across several independent packet switching networks.
This requires a common agreement in formatting messages, but constraints are minimized while preserving implementation freedom and efficiency."

Of course, many questions remained-- protocol translation vs. common protocol? How to do this all, without dynamic routing? What about the regulatory landscape, etc. We lucked out into a pretty good outcome, overall.

> could also treat censorship as a form of damage

This is a feature of the culture of the 'net it existed in the 80's and 90's based on experience with Usenet (which indeed does kind of route-around-censorship in many cases, but also engendered a group of users who culturally subverted attempts at censorship), and not a feature of the internet protocols themselves.
> We already have free health for the poor:

No, we have free health insurance for some of the poor (states that have no accepted the ACA expansion have basically no coverage for adults without dependents.)

Medicaid is not (as a generality) free health care (it can be, in some states, for some recipients). It is free health insurance, which can have copayments, coinsurance, deductibles, etc.
of course it's different. it takes so much effort and conscious choice. it's not like AIs are trained based on only things in the public domain.
You aren't familiar with the propaganda if you think folks duped by it would consider "other societies" with anything other than fear hatred and contempt. The problem with "do your own research" is confirmation bias.
There are many compiled languages that produce more performant code than V8. As you noted yourself yourself, V8 has time constraints - it must be able to compile and run the code "fast enough" for a web page to load. This limits the extent of optimizations that it can perform.
TIL

Thanks
The FF industry is leaping (has leapt, historically) on CCS as a getout clause and has sunk french metric tonnes of money into CCS. So far, its uneconomic except for the specific use of pumping gas into wells to make them more productive, which leads to more fugitive gas. No significant CCS experiment worldwide has achieved its goals as sequestration. The one in Western Australia releases so much CO2 it has to pay a penalty cost, to maintain status. (its a gas field associated with other extractive industry I believe)

This money they've sunk: its not their money: they've been doing it off the public teat as "research" or, when it is their money, its booked to R&D and has massive royalty & tax offset benefits. Its a shellgame.

The inclusion of blue hydrogen+CCS in this piece is really regrettable: its being used to avoid having to wear the cost of going to green hydrogen, which is abandoning FF inputs. For holders of shares in coal and gas, this is not optimal so they oppose green and argue abatement by CCS is "the one"

It doesn't work. CCS is a giant con. The evidence is strong that at scale CCS is not working, and will waste years of time, billions of dollars of cost, and gigatonnes of CO2, to prove it.

Overall I like Gates trying to help. He's been badly advised when it comes to CCS.
Here is a controversial one: there is no scientific “fact”.

Science has been so successful that scientists have forgotten that their method doesn’t unearth truths, but models.

This is very annoying in astro physics. If you visit a planetarium, they’ll tell you all about dark energy as an absolutely certainty of the universe without ever mentioning that it’s a giant thorn in the butt of physics. No one will tell you: “hey remember that 9th planet we told you about in school, yeah that’s not a thing anymore!”

Obviously there are things in the models that work perfectly, so you could say that it’s a fact that people with three chromosome 21 have dawn syndrome.

But overall few scientific models work as well as genetics, and even there, discoveries in epigenetics seem to make things not as black or white as we used to think.

My opinion is that the current distrust in science comes from the extreme cockiness of some scientists (and stupidity of science journalism), just imposing their views by stating “it’s been scientifically proven”, when they actually mean: “it’s not been scientifically disproved”.

The rna-based vaccination is a great example. The fact is that no one knows the long term effects of an rna-based vaccination. People are fairly confident that there are none, but there is no proof whatsoever that this is safe long term (disclaimer I think it is safe and I am vaccinated).

While Rna-based vaccination is a gigantic achievement stemming from decades of immense progress in molecular biology, it is an insult to intelligence to tell people that it is safe.

Anyways, just my thoughts…
The latter makes a lot of sense, if people have to put in more mental work to extract a meaning from it, they might treasure their findings more. Cool concept.