skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Probably not the best idea, given how similar it to "Google", but I assume all better alternatives were trademarked away or something. Then again, if Google would be stupid enough to declare they own the word "goggles", it may generate a lot of PR for the project that they would never get otherwise. So may end up a win.
> requiring a complete replacement roughly every two weeks, or complex and costly purification and recycling of the gaseous blende. It is a cost-benefit analysis for the $500 billion USD semiconductor industry.

Is the recycling process only available at lab scale currently due to the cost? How hard would it be to scale up? Or are chip companies betting on the war in Ukraine being over in a couple of months?
> Nope. Malthus made his observation based on history. He just happened to do so at the worst possible time, as the next couple of centuries saw unprecedented advances in food production and distribution followed by the more developed countries getting their population in check

Isn't that also a problem with the "refutations" of him? They're also based on history, just slightly more recent history. It's quite possible that future "advances in food production" will eventually fail to keep up with (perhaps slower) population growth, or future changes (climate change, reductions in fossil fuels, etc.) will undo some of the previous "advances in food production" required to sustain our current population.
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/081415/under...

Basically, banks are the ones that get the money.

The Federal Reserve buys Treasuries or other financial papers with the "new" money.

Banks can then turn around and loan that money.

So, institutions and individuals in good terms with banks are then which benefit from the "new" money (if you get easy loans, you can get real estate, buy stocks, etc...)
Well, there are genuine answers to these questions. Stephen Pinker asserts the world is getting better because, according to his value system, it is.

Many, maybe even the majority, of people would agree with him because, well, we're humans.

So, in this threads context, once people have the "facts", they ALSO agree that the world is better, not worse.
Am I Using Brave?
G1's deduplication is nice, but note that G1's deduplication is a lot weaker than what String.intern does. G1 deduplicates the underlying byte array, but leaves separate strings (so s1 == s2 will evaluate false). So you still have an extra object header.

If you have (like one our applications did) millions of copies of the string "USA" in memory, that's many megabytes of memory that explicit deduplication can save that the garbage collector can't.

String.intern isn't the way, for all the reasons this post outlines, but just using G1 isn't the right approach either.
Brave threads on HN have a lot of very hostile posters, so it's not surprising.
Broadly, yes. It's been years since I asked a question, and for searching and finding an answer, github issues has replaced it.
Why not produce an aggregate across all locations?

I appreciate the value of getting up-close with the data to see quality issues, put things in context, etc. But the lack of an overall analysis leaves the most relevant question unasked, leaving us only with the author's biases (as they themselves admit.)
If they are materialized into a table, they will work! Diffing queries is not supported yet.

data-diff only relies on a `sum(md5(concat(col1, col2)))` aggregation as well as `min(id), max(id)` to get the id bookends.
Governments wanting people to breed and have kids is so creepy.
Note before anyone gets too excited: doesn't work on iOS, and you have to sideload an app on Android, if you want to use it from a phone.

These aren't problems for everyone but I think they should be front and center when suggesting it.
I would suggest that loss of nuance is true in some societies and not others.

We can and should be working to increase the fidelity of communication as well as make policy less of a blunt instrument. Education can work wonders as can honest, real, considerate conversations. All of these things benefit all of us.

Things are different today when compared to our young experiences. Younger people have far more information than anyone making these policy decisions does.

People did make that poor leap. Yes.

Will they do it again? I doubt many of them will, and the ones who might are likely to be using pot and will combust and inhale.

Society has far different norms and can handle nuance far better today. We need to recognize these changes and treat people better.

They can and will respond. They have tech and the body of common knowledge continues beyond what it was two decades ago.

This kind of "we know better for you" communication packs a lackluster punch and may do more harm than good.
>They seem to be doing it for the thrill. Like a sport.

I will admit that I sometimes steal candy/snacks from convenience stores for this exact reason. There is a very real thrill involved in getting away with something, and I've (mostly jokingly) considered going to SF just to steal things from convenience stores.

It really seems like a no brainer why this is happening more often. If, as a child, your parents said "we are no longer going to punish you for doing the thing that we told you not to do," wouldn't you start doing that thing more again? I get that wealth inequality is bad and I get that our criminal justice system can be horrific, but so many people seem to automatically assume that all this theft is only people stealing to feed/clothe/house themselves and/or their children. Has no one else ever just stolen stuff for the fun of it?
So things like that, that the president does or does not do, can be laid at the feet of the president.

But he does not control the economy, and does not know the perfect answer to a black swan event like Covid… since we don’t know what the perfect response looks like. For example, hard lockdown = possibly less Covid, more harm from the lockdown. No lockdown = possibly more Covid, economy keeps booming (unless everyone dies of Covid!). What’s the optimal mix? Nobody knows. The president, even if he knows, cannot snap his fingers and make it happen.
For example window size negotiation
How are the random reads/writes? AFAIK this contributes a lot to a device feeling responsive.
https://www.aerotime.aero/articles/31344-chinese-companies-r...

Chinese companies “are ready” to deliver aircraft parts to Russian airlines, said Chinese Ambassador to Russia Zhang Hanhui, according to Russian state news agency TASS.

We will see how much can be delivered by the Chinese. And let us see how long Europe will keep up the sanctions when the winter strikes.
The thing with DDD is that most ideas it expresses are not unprecedented. Most good programmers will tend to have an intuitive sense of those concepts and thus put off by what appears to be an overly formal treatise on obvious principles. I don't see it as any practice or process that can be adopted by a team, rather my takeaway from the book was the emphasis on domain, and the need to develop a common vocabulary that can help communicate about the domain.

Building a vocabulary in itself is not going to solve design. The hardest parts are always in agreeing to what the right domain is, and the book makes it no secret that there is no silver bullet, but that it is a hard, continuous pursuit. I think ultimately the greatest value the book has to offer is to provide a window into the minds of wise old men, to understand their thought processes honed over long accomplished careers, learn from their mistakes and experiences and build mental tools of our own that can help us think in the same direction.
Google, giggling giddily, gobbles "goggles".
I know this is tongue and cheek but seriously. Look at other things like nest... its nice and not nice at the same time.
You know you set the expectations. Is it firing offense if you reply in 30 mins.
"surviving" in slums of filth and crime while likely costing taxpayers more than homing them would (not to mention the high prevalence of mental illness among the homeless)

it's just outright idiotic policy to accept the current state of homelessness in many major cities, it's inhumane AND expensive
Bravid VS Googliath
> LO does seem to need a full DE (e.g. Gnome/KDE/xfce)

LibreOffice seems to do just fine for me here without a DE. I wonder if there's something I'm missing that I don't realize?
In the case of HTML, that was called XHTML, and it never took off because users need their browser to be forgiving, whether they know it or not.
I am confused. They didn't want children to vape but they were in schools saying it is safe? This makes zero sense and I am not sure how your reply is coherent. Does the Sinclair quote apply here?
wait so if i authenticate tailscale using google and enable tailscale ssh's google can just log into any of my tailscale ssh servers?
Yea let's just shit on the people who are at their lowest point in our society and not let them have comforts such as alcohol that the rich enjoy on a daily basis. The existence of people in poverty is absolutely fucking horrible compared to what most experience in the US and other OECD nations
I've seen embedded videos auto play directly from external sites, in the app. Making the video fullscreen just expand what appears to be a frame, with ads and all present.
My understanding is this is the generally accepted theory for most of the highly "want to use" technologies. Likewise the least "want to use" technologies tend to be business-y type tools where people might be made to use them for the ease of other stakeholders, or integration with frameworks only used by e.g. legacy enterprise software.
I'm a bit confused; as far as I know Linux only forwards packets on interfaces where you've enabled routing, doesn't it?

If you set up:

net.ipv4.ip_forward=0
net.ipv4.conf.eth0.forwarding=0
net.ipv4.conf.docker.forwarding=1

I'm pretty sure this isn't an issue, right?

My guess is that the real real story is probably that every guide on the internet says to just set net.ipv4.ip_forward=1 and that nobody bothers to stop and read up on the sysctl parameters they're copy/pasting from the internet.

For this attack to succeed, the attacker also needs to be on the same network or have their upstream ISPs accept plain external traffic towards internal networks. Executing the PoC on Linux without being in the same subnet won't even be accepted (though raw sockets may still send out traffic towards the host that will probably get filtered somewhere along the way).
You're probably correct, I have no good excuses for my Spanish other than that I learned it by immersion over years instead of taking a class or something
Some cats respond to Valerian root instead.

Also, there's definitely some potency or freshness qualities of catnip.

I'd tried it with my cat and thought for years she didn't respond, but I ended up with a small sachet and she went bonkers, but I don't know what the difference was.
I should've added, there's an obvious example for the "SaaS control plane" separation, which is equivalent: "stop processing job X that is destabilizing the cluster" should be processed without needing to fight for resources with job X. Same for ACL changes, user deactivations, etc etc. It's generally a good idea to have your control stuff not be subject to whatever instabilities you might be controlling against.
Not really. It's basically the holy grail for any future lifetime proposals for D.

The GCC static analyzer is actually clever enough to spot these types of bugs (memory ones anyway, not database handles) but this doesn't scale.
That would only change your mosquito problem into a cat problem ...
Is there a reason why you don't operate in Brazil? Language maybe?
Not exactly ghostwriting but the classic example is the Stratemeyer Syndicate which produced a huge number of YA books (Tom Swift, Hardy Boys, Nancy Drew) by pseudonymous authors.
For what it's worth I encountered the same issue and came up with a solution:

https://github.com/cloudflare/cloudflared/issues/574

Cloudflare have ignored the github issue (which includes a solution) but at least 3 other people seem to have found my solution helpful.
No tests can be better than a bunch of brittle mock object tests that don't test anything important. Thankfully it's very easy to delete them.

If changing one line of code regularly requires me to update mocks in 100 test cases, those test cases may have negative value.
Edit: sorry, forgot a part, yes you can recharge and EV even at 100W but the battery do not balance cells, as a result it last less time. Witch means for instance 8 years instead of 10 of usable life. 7kW is generally the "needed mean" to balance for most EVs, normally you have such issue mentioned in the manual.

Can you show me an example, I looked at the owners manual for a few cars and none mentioned an issue with slow Level1 charging.

Few big enough power plants can coordinate themselves to monitor and decide, too many small and spread can't. Even with frequency shifting witch is the fastest and simplest way possible we can't.

My utility can already turn off my air conditioner during peak demand, why is it harder to turn off a 4000W load when they need more power than to turn on a 4000W battery when they need more power?
Theft not only takes resources away from the person stolen from, but increases costs across society as security has to be implemented. It is a negative externality.

I don’t understand the other side as presented.
No one is obligated to respond to every "you didn't do it the way I would have done it" comment.
Maybe not today. But they did in previous decades.
sure but that sucks, especially on mobile. doubly so if you try to do anything mildly more advanced like embed images.
Why not all those things?
The rules are enforced by the compiler not a linter.

Linting in a way that requires semantic analysis is not well trodden ground in D tooling.

deadalnix and myself are aiming to rectify this somewhat by ramping up work on sdc, which is basically a D frontend done right.
Shopify Functions: Back end customization with WebAssembly
I have no idea why you were downvoted for this.

“Loss prevention” is just private security and it’s definitely problematic. Through profiling it reinforces racism and classism. Can you imagine how unpleasant it must be to be treated with suspicion every time you walk into a Target?

I think retailers could absolutely develop more compassionate ways of preventing things from being stolen, but why would they? There’s no incentive.
That would be fine, but what if it is a slightly different "I don’t really care about my patients’ lives. I just like the power of having a hand in whether people live or die."? Doesn't that start to sound a little questionable?

As Dan says "The goal is to protect the business — not to ruin people’s lives." Is Alex getting that "huge adrenaline rush" from protecting Walmart's property? Or is he getting that adrenaline from having power over people? Because his desire "to move back to the field side, where we actually deal with people" seems to imply that it is the power over people that he craves and not the loss prevention.
Avoiding the Royal Touch
When and how to cold email important people
Ah, the ample club of wishful thinking.

There are two general ways of approaching software design (and I'm paraphrasing Tony Hoare here):

1. You can write software so simple there are obviously no errors

2. You can write software so complex there are no obvious errors

One thing that escapes "grug" is that achieving 1. often requires more sophistication than their magical club allows. Most well-intentioned "grug" developers will write software so simple that it becomes it's own form of complexity: a giant mud-ball of for-loops, while-loops, variable assignments, and other wonderful side effects. Instead of addressing complexity head-on with abstraction, "grug" will beat "galaxy brain" over the head.

What grug fails to understand is that simplicity isn't easy or familiar. It doesn't mean "sticking to what you know." If often requires being able to reason about programs and to verify that reasoning!

But go ahead grug... keep beating people over the head with the club and hope that the complexity will go away.
Museum of Failure – Nike Magneto 1995-1997
I’m aware of all the problems that e2e tests have, and yet I find it more useful to have 1 test that adds something to a basket and 1 test that removes it than 100 unit tests without contract tests (which I never got the hang of TBH).

(To be fair, my projects are low on JavaScript which somewhat changes the trade-off calculations, but I haven’t seen any assertions about project types above.)
Many reasons, waiting for people to forget about the crimean invasion, waiting for people to be distracted, waiting for an especially cold winter that would cause europe more harm if they instituted sanctions, waiting for his health to deteriorate.
Dartmouth College is eliminating loans from its financial aid packages
> Google more than a year to reach 2.5 billion queries, and DuckDuckGo more than 4 years.

I love Brave as a search engine but these statistics are misleading. They fail to account for the fact that there were only 147 million users in 1998, but today we have 5 billion users.
You use Docker as a distribution mechanism for the output of a reproducibility-oriented build system like Guix or Nix. Pin your dependencies inside the build system, then the build system can generate a container.
Are people making ice wine wherever you are?
Though k8s works with docker, you shouldnt need to use it off the bat, especially in the beginning without having lots of experience with docker itself. Most projects dont need k8s and i personally have never used it.

I agree the docker docs are lacking, i basically learned everything by googling stuff, stack overflow and reading some blog posts
Please come to Brazil!
If I was at a bar and someone smelled like cat nip because they rolled in it, I would buy them a beer for sure. It also might mean I'm at DEF CON.
Is your goal isolation or just having the devices not access the internet?

If your goal is only to prevent them from accessing the internet, the simplest solution is to hardcode the IP addresses on your devices, but leave the gateway settings blank (or use a dummy address if needed)
My impression is that most computer users have a limited sense of which software applications are churning through battery, and instead just blame the computer vendor.

That is, if Chrome churns through battery on a Mac laptop, the typical user is going to just think “Apple laptops have poor battery life”, never realizing that switching to Safari would make a significant difference.
Wouldn’t "Docker Postfix" or "Docker qmail" be podman?
> Public transport was crippled during the pandemic for obvious reasons... Let's not forget that.

A once a century event shouldn't define the other 98 years.

> Getting rid of cars also means eliminating a huge volume of revenue from federal, state, and local government from related taxes... This means funding for bike lanes, roads, and even public transport, would evaporate.

This is not an issue. If people aren't buying cars, they'll have more money that they'll spend on other things or we can just raise taxes because people have more money.

> We still have major factories, ships, planes, and many other big business hallmarks that create the majority of pollution in the world (while the same companies try to portray that they are "green"). Conservation efforts are futile unless we start talking about the real issues, and create accountability, not if we leave rules up to profit seeking individuals and companies.

We're never gonna solve climate change if we only focus on the biggest issues. It's multifaceted problem.
I voted for Biden in 2020. It feels better to say this wasn't his fault for those of us who voted for him. It was his fault, and primarily a failure of his administration, especially Jake Sullivan, who is the least qualified National Security Advisor I've ever seen, including those who advised GW Bush, which is saying something. His qualifications are primarily political and partisan, and he's incredibly thin on actual defense matters. Feel free to take a look at his background, and prepare to be depressed that he wasn't fired immediately after that fiasco. In fact, nobody was fired from the administration, which for me was the most horrifying part. Obama's administration NEVER WOULD HAVE LET THIS HAPPEN.

Specifically, "the planning by the military" was under constraints placed on it by the executive branch. (The constraints were that no more troops would be added on the ground to "cover the withdrawal" and that all civilian contractors had to be out of country months prior, which immediately destroyed all air capability depended upon by Afghan forces) And the idea that Biden was committed to any plan concocted in the Trump administration is absurd. (this treaty was already long in violation by Taliban as well) Nobody who voted for Biden, myself included, expected (or wanted!) him to cling to any plans developed by the previous administration. It's an excuse. I'm a former defense/intel contractor, I've been to Bagram on multiple occasions, and everyone in the DoD community knows that this was an executive branch mistake conflated with malignant obedience at the Pentagon command level.

In case I sound partisan (I'm not), let me be extremely clear in my statement:
The botched withdrawal of Afghanistan NEVER WOULD HAVE HAPPENED under Obama. His administration was vastly more competent than the current one, on multiple matters.

Without a surge of troops to cover withdrawal, the US embassy in Kabul could not be secured simultaneously with Bagram. The decision was made to instead focus on securing the embassy AND HKI airport and to abandon Bagram instead. As is typical of decisions coming from the top levels of the Pentagon under intense executive pressure, all feedback from the ground of the plan's lack of feasibility was ignored, along with warnings of the rapidity of ADF collapse once civilian contractors were pulled from the hangars.

I'm stating this because, not unlike the highly partisan administration under GW Bush, when partisans get too much power in administrations, you get disasters like this. Partisans are selected for loyalty over competence, and it's a growing epidemic in US politics that partisans get more and more power in successive administrations.
I think crowdsourcing a name by polling the public will get you something like OfficeMcOfficeFace, and that is if you are lucky. So if this is your roundabout way of pointing out that the name could be even worse, well played.