skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
When I was much younger, I was introduced to the "failed star" theory for gas giant planets. That theory is a lot more than just failed stars. Other relevant parts of the theory include that the gravity created by both stars and these failed star gas giants create the dense but not always solid cores that sometimes eventually become planets if something catastrophic occurs - which is not uncommon in the stellar grand scheme of things.

They tend to change a lot once iron starts to form, unless they are stars (and related bright things) that are big enough to create enough pressure for the creation of other elements like gold and platinum that need more nuclear pressure than most others.

We know it rains diamonds within the layers of near-twin planets Neptune and Uranus, so it's not really all that far fetched.

There are a number of theories, and once in a while someone will go beyond the one they teach without debate in grade school.
Generally Intelligent (YC S17) is hiring machine learning research engineers
Generally Intelligent is an AI research company. Our mission is to build human-like general intelligence and make it safely accessible in order to ensure that the transition to greater-than-human intelligence leads to a more abundant, unconstrained, and equitable society. We take a first-principles approach, starting from simple self-supervised architectures and evolving them to tackle human developmental milestones of increasing complexity.

Machine Learning Research Engineer role (onsite in San Francisco only): https://jobs.lever.co/generallyintelligent/c2f4a435-1eef-489...

If you don’t have ML experience or you are remote, see the Systems Engineer role: https://jobs.lever.co/generallyintelligent/7afede07-8f22-4c4...

Or the ML Engineer (Remote) role: https://jobs.lever.co/generallyintelligent/9411e2ec-502a-403...
> Now, instead of the info being discoverable instantly, it takes about 30 seconds

No, in the original UI, the information that the users was looking for was not discoverable instantly, and it would have taken much longer than 30 seconds.

I suspect that the author originally wrote a UI that was convenient for them to write, and is going through mental gymnastics to try and justify to themselves why their original UI was better.

> So, despite it taking objectively longer for users to get their answers, they loved it.

Objectively? If a user wants to know what the conditions are at a particular resort, the map-based UI is objectively better. A UI that shows them data that they are not interested in is objectively worse.

I think this article is an example of how, when writing an application, it's easy to throw together a UI that matches our data model. It's much harder to make a UI useful.
In no way would an amount so little lead to death. Maybe if you aspirate vomit or trip and fall.
Pre container times there were recipes to build VMs including plain shell ( which can also be used to build containers).

Docker, the FOSs tools and the hub are very nice packaging.
You just said SWEs are some of the highest paying positions in the US. Not to mention many are able to work fully remote. It should be feasible that even with a family they can move.
Sure, but in general we don't ban products because they smell gross. I can buy a durian fruit, or put rotten eggs in a dumpster, or be homeless and unable to bathe and that's not illegal on its own.

There's a lot of stuff that's gross and obnoxious that isn't banned by the FTC or FDA.
Modern syntax:

sudo launchctl kickstart -kp system/com.apple.audio.coreaudiod
isnt this like tumblr?
Several U.S. states launch investigations into crypto firm Celsius Network
> You need to change your company's culture.

How would one do that exactly? Like I said, I could just not respond right away, and then I either have to respond to a whole discussion later in a mess of threads, or ignore it, but either way I'll get labeled a bad communicator and hard to work with.
What's interesting to me, I think, is that it's not that hard to find mainstream media that promotes a lot of these same ideas. Start with the most watched cable TV network. ;)

Yet even the people on Fox News would largely agree with the view that they are somehow "outside" the norm. While happily pocketing their advertiser money for having the most viewers...

My question is: why do people let them? It only helps the truly extreme! In two main ways: First, the more the truly extreme can convince the moderates/"traditional" that it's "us against the world," the easier to radicalize them. Second, the less that progressive folks accurately represent the prevalence of such views, the more out of touch their messaging inevitably will become in an echo chamber, shooting themselves in the foot.

The fact that Twitter is full of people who get lots of views for screaming about stuff that is actually quite mainstream in the US and even globally is an indictment of Twitter, too, for that matter. Why are we still paying attention?
I think DDD is a way of minimizing the semantic distance between the code and the slice of the world it affects.
> Some of the best work of my career has been when I've gone off piste and prototyped something that has surprised my managers or disrupted the way a team thought they had to work.

When I came to this realization myself, it was both sad (losing faith in the system which I had, until then, trusted to allocate work effectively) and liberating (I can just trust myself and do what I believe to be best)
The first design did not tell you:

* Where any of these trails are. Are they even in the same area? State? Country? No idea.

* If any of the trails are any good

* Who those people are and why you should care.

* Whether those reports deserve your attention (no difference between "it was nice" and "this is closed due to a landslide yesterday")

Honestly the map UI is pretty terrible too. It still doesn't tell you anything useful about the trails. What does the duration even mean? Is that how far away they are from you? How long it takes to ski them? How long ago the most recent report was? No idea.

It feels like the UX was built by someone who's never tried to actually find a place to go skiing in a new area. I mean, this isn't even a new problem... just copy an existing app:

Trailforks already does it pretty well:
https://www.trailforks.com/region/bend/?activitytype=1&z=9.3... (most popular mountain bike routes near a place)

Alltrails too, for hiking:
https://www.alltrails.com/ shows you local favorites, super straightforward but tells you all the essentials (these are closeby, they're favorites because they're highly reviewed, here's how long they are, and a pretty picture) or the map view: https://www.alltrails.com/explore?b_tl_lat=44.16336969078622...

Not only were those the wrong lessons to draw from the two UIs, I think the bigger underlying issue is that the designer doesn't know how users actually look for places to go. Even when eventually given that insight, the conclusion shouldn't be "show a map instead of a list" but "I need to better understand what criteria are important for finding a place to go." Hint: It's not the recency of trail reports.

Maybe the trail reports view is just one screen out of many, and if so this would make more sense, but still... just look at how data-rich and useful the trailforks trail report view is: https://www.trailforks.com/region/bend/reports/ You can instantly pick a trail, or an area, or an activity/difficulty/whatever and see whether it's OK to go there. Much more useful than combing through a bunch of individual reports from anonymous internet people on a timeline. It's the aggregate data that's helpful.
It’s mint botanically but it doesn’t taste of mint gastronomically.

It tastes a bit of bubblegum!
Well, that's certainly a way to put together a passphrase, or a band name, not sure which.
> From your perspective a Christian has faith in God solely because they want to.

That is just my guess in most cases, but of course there can be many different reasons.

It is a bit ironic yes. I remember talking to Christians who told me it is basically a sin to NOT believe. So if you don't believe, it is not just that God didn't give you that gift of faith, but that you really have to force yourself to believe, or else you go to Hell. And you have to believe that it is not you who is forcing you to believe but it is God that makes you believe, if and when you do.

But my point was not really about whether to "believe" or not, but how does it come to be that you believe the very specific set of beliefs that you do, which I assume vary from person to person even within the same congregation.
Not to justify author's UX choices, but he does mention that the feed shows reports from the trails the user follows. It's not a list of random trail reports, there is some logic behind it.
This is a good question to add to my survey.

My suspicion is that these women feel as though their desired gender role(s) are being ignored or dismissed by media.

The only quote I have on this subject: "If all you see on TV and the internet is successful women CEOs being celebrated, you start to feel like that's the only way to be correctly feminine."

Several of my interviews veered into this territory, but I regret not pressing more into these feelings.
As someone who used to run away from the police, it's generally easiest to get away from them by running on foot -- if your environment and circumstances doesn't let you run away on foot then you'll rarely succeed getting away using another method.

But I don't understand this policy. What constitutes "running"? Can someone just slowly walk away?
I guess the author try to blame a low value app's lack of user engagement onto the UI design. Then the excuse to apply dark pattern of UI design would be to increase user engagement. Sounds about right? No?
The literature on interpreters (vs. compilers) is pretty thin. I enjoyed reading these:

1. Peter John Brown. 1979. Writing Interactive Compilers and Interpreters.

2. Timothy Budd. 1987. A Little Smalltalk.

3. Ralph E. Griswold. 2000. The Icon Programming Language, 3e.

4. Pat Shaughnessy. 2013. Ruby Under a Microscope: An Illustrated Guide to Ruby Internals.

This is a new one I haven't read yet, but it looks very practical:

5. Clinton L. Jeffery. 2021. Build Your Own Programming Language: A Programmer's Guide to Designing Compilers, Interpreters, and DSLs for Solving Modern Computing Problems.

I don't know anything about this one, but people have told me they prefer the first edition:

6. Ronald Mak. 1991. Writing Compilers and Interpreters: An Applied Approach.
You know, if I could do it over, we would have also considered Wichita, Kansas or El Paso, TX (my home town) but unfortunately we didn't do it for no other reason than it just didn't cross our minds at the time.

I speak Spanish and I had experience working with a team in Colombia, so we naturally gravitated in that direction!

Regarding office or work from home, it's up to the team! We have local offices in 6 different cities. in places where we don't have offices, a quiet co-working location with great internet and office perks is built in when building a team with Astro.
If it takes you 6 months to get your software back up and running, is it really a good backup solution ?
> Whether it's open or not is a matter of policy

If you have to rely on some policy - it’s not censorship free.

You propose we literally rely on a trusted third party to adjudicate things.

AKA a literal censor? To make things censor free?
> so let's not kid ourselves that prison is more expensive than the alternatives: it isn't.

I don't think I've heard even the strictest pro-prison people try to seriously make the argument that prison is cheaper than housing for the same time periods of detention. Prison is really expensive, it's in a lot of ways a strict superset of housing. Even just holding people in preparation of a trial and getting them convicted is really expensive. Where are you getting these numbers from?

> No, we are arguing about where that responsibility should be taken

I mean, if you want to argue about that, sure. But my argument is that they're on the street right now and saying that they should have avoided getting addicted to drugs in the past is not particularly useful to the current conversation unless you have a time machine handy.

> no criminalization = no judge to force rehab, of course

Look, this is just a different argument. Are you arguing that rehab does actually work, but we need criminalization so we can force it? I have seen people argue that point, but it's not really an argument about personal responsibility, it's an argument that the state should have even more involvement in rehabilitation than it currently does.
Then farting outside should be illegal
That would only be relevant if you were already in the vicinty.

I would guess that many/most users would check things out first from home, maybe hundreds of miles away. They might use the results to decide which field to go to.
ABOUT TIME!
2-XL
...and now you have 2 cakes.
>we need to regulate the shit out of search engines and employers in order to protect people from unearned reputation damage.

No we don't, in fact not fixing this provides plausible deniability which in many cases is more valuable.
I'm also a bit confused by the terms used here. Is Replicated (https://www.replicated.com) an example of the kind of "control plane" you're referencing?
A split board, the Kinesis Freestyle Edge.

I find the split board really helps with my posture, plus it looks cool. The RGB effects are fun, and the brown switches are clicky but not too loud during video calls.
When you pay the hacker with your tax base funds, there is no accountability. Incentives matter, and the county was incompetent.

> “The only data that we had that wasn’t backed up was in our auditor's office, where we have our financial software,” Ramos said.

Seems like it should’ve been a priority.

(a component of my work in risk mgmt is business continuity and disaster recovery, excuse my saltiness)
The key term here is "commandeering" - basically, US courts have ruled that, under our structure of government as outlined in the constitution, it is illegal for the federal government to force the state governments to enforce federal laws on behalf of the feds. This includes requiring states to pass laws that match federal laws.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commandeering

This provides a convenient upper boundary on the actual power of the federal level - they can ban all they want under the modern expansive implementation of the Commerce Clause, but to get effective enforcement, they either need to allocate enough money on the federal level to cover the entire country, or they need to convince the states to help them enforce.
Is this why my 2021 iMac sounds like a jet engine spinning up when I watch a youtube video in Firefox?

I just assumed this was yet another attempt by google to sabotage the competition.
Yeah at work on Mac docker desktop isn't fun. At home on Linux Docker is easy. How Mac won mindshare, woof.
Moderna says new Covid-19 variant shot will be ready by August
Isn't that the whole point of a container is to not retain state of anything else within the filesystem other than the desired entrypoint/cmd(s)?
Why didn't they just restore from back-up?
Alo! As a dev, where do I register for the platform?
This sound like very high level, easy to “predict” predictions. Show me a percentage of how many predictions in a book worked out and how much detail they went into before I buy this snake oil. Yes, I’m using prediction intentionally. This isn’t an analysis, it’s prediction.
https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20220517-psg-player-idris...

dude merely refuses to play, gets viral because "homophobia is not an opinion, it's a crime"
and they were discussing sanctioning him.

speaking of the slavery issues, doesn't the west do the exact same thing meanwhile keeping the slaves in their countries? ps. China and India etc.

Anyways, I think any player refusing to wear a shirt with the Islamic slogan "No God But Allah" should be considered to be sanctioned, because "Islamophobia isn't an opinion, it's a crime", Also I would argue you can't really call the majority of muslims "privileged".

So, when will that be? hopefully France will start first, because secularism isn't discriminatory, right?
Hence my suggestion, if your product saves me $500/seat/month then I'll gladly pay $50/seat/month.

Wordpress is a great example, rather than build another Wordpress, solve one problem Wordpress doesn't solve (example: Elementor) and do it far better (depth vs breadth).

We are using this Github Action (https://github.com/flowwer-dev/pull-request-stats) for now, it adds stats to every PR, it has helped the team visualize their contributions and how critical it was for us moving forward and as a manager/tech-lead it helps me identify areas of improvements at the individual level. I think it's a simple idea with a lot of depth.
The major problem with cartridges is, beyond the very real risk of effectively having a pipe bomb in your hand pointed at your face, is that those in charge of formulas are assholes. They're desperately trying to duplicate the experience of smoking weed, including intentionally adding propylene glycol and other irritants for the effect of throat irritation to make you cough. They're failing and ruining the experience. This is asinine. The tastes are horrible and lean towards chemically, synthetic tastes.

The other problem is the massive, absurdly huge, selection. Choices are great, but they went absolutely nuts (and the same is true of flower selections), and I would assume it is a stoner in charge of all this crap. Bad idea.

The high from cartridges is very one dimensional, just not as potent as decent flower.

Also, you're out of your mind if you think cartridges are cheaper than flower. It isn't even close, cost is on the order of 300% more expensive for cartridges.

If all this could be fixed, if the makers would stop assuming what consumers want and just produce an honest product without the bullshit, carts might become superior.
That means zero discoverability.
PMs represent the customer. That being the case, they push hard for features and leave it to engineers to keep features coming out at predictable speed.

Engineers represent themselves. They are accountable for feature delivery speed and product stability. That being the case they push hard for hardening, automating, and maintaining.

The two have to balance each other out. PMs need to push to keep Eng focused on growing business value, otherwise the company will never make money. Eng needs to push PMs to focus on long term product delivery, otherwise customers will leave as quickly as they come, and new one's will stop showing up, no matter how pretty the UI looks.

If you had a team of engineers like you describe it would only be heaven for about 6 months in my experience. I've seen two separate teams of engineers run this way. Everything was kick-ass until it was suddenly horrible and engineers started bailing.
>So, despite it taking objectively longer for users to get their answers, they loved it.

As long they had already favorited the trail they wanted to know about.
> Weight is an outcome that has many factors outside of diet

Thermodynamics disagrees with this assertion.
No I don't believe any axioms and theorems should be infinitely long. If they were then there would not be enough time for us to understand them, or even read them through. Theorems which nobody can understand would not be useful for anything.
AIUI S models are dual-core, C models are single-core.

And S models still use tensilica CPUs, but that will change over time.
Thank you! You're obviously a smart person! :)
Counter argument: pollution, environment issues and wealth inequality were all created as the populations rose. Billionaires like Musk and Gates will have the most to lose if there are fewer people to buy their wares and fewer employees you can push around. Rest of us will see a much better quality of life.
I want to live there.

My jar of mayo costed $5.50 with tax yesterday.
America is a masterpiece.
The gap is insane even between the FAANGs, someone got an offer at $450 total comp (inc grants over five years) at one and the other couldn't even break 225/yr total. Something is gonna have to give.
This is how I learned and rounded out the edges with random forums.
Or, alternatively, see the writing on the wall and foresee what next steps will come, like in other countries. Doesn't seem like a long term investment.
Introducing PyScript (summary of PyCon keynote)
Wonderful! How would it work with gui based clients for the check prompts? Just launches the browser?

Can’t wait to try this.
I find a lot of body odor or perfume and how heavily it is applied just as offensive, but I don't think people should be told to change because of that.
Headline seems unnecessarily inflammatory. Putting aside the decision of whether or not they should've paid, what else were they going to pay with?
I have to say, I find this sentiment confusing and unimaginative. Progressives never stop talking about all the subtle impediments to progress felt by marginalized groups -- microaggressions, stereotype threat, not seeing people who look like you in positions of power, what it's like to hold beliefs not shared by the dominant culture, etc, etc.

But then they express disbelief when a member of a group they've deemed to be "powerful" responds similarly to cultural messaging. If you're a slightly conservative/traditional person in a university or even just a major U.S. city, you're going to be bombarded with messaging that implies non-traditional choices should be exalted and that your traditional choices should at least be viewed with suspicion. Progressives of all people should understand why that might result in someone with traditional beliefs internalizing the notion that their choices are bad. "We're not saying your choices are bad, we're just saying over and over and over again that the other choices are good."

We're told that depictions of minorities in media can have powerful, life-altering effects, but when every commercial depicts dads as bumbling idiots and family life as chaotic and undesirable [0], suddenly there are no conceivable implications?

It's all pretty straightforward if you just take your own arguments seriously (and remember that individuals experience the world as individuals, even if they're part of some group you perceive to be privileged).

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kEYp6OY7BI
True. People have to learn this hard truth and don‘t treat companies like „family“. Especially companies run by ruthless, lying and unstable CEOs like Elon.
> Due to yesterday’s fire in the Emerald Hills area, the main Stanford campus lost the power supplied by PG&E’s main transmission line to the campus. PG&E is providing a limited supply of power through a secondary line, but it falls far short of the normal needs of the campus. This limited supply is being used to maintain cooling for the hospital and other critical infrastructure on campus
This is one of the few joys I have left in life, don't take this from me.
Nobilizing your opinion on morality doesn't justify your lack of understanding of vaccine mandates. This is exactly the counterpoint I made to OP that you're doing now.

But I suspect you know that, which is why you're not addressing my comment.
> A recent ransomware attack on Brooks County’s Justice of the Peace and district courts, and finance department, cost it more than $37,000.

> “We had determined if we didn’t, then it would take us anywhere from six months to a year to reconstruct our software program,” Ramos said.

How much would it have cost for 6-12 months of engineer time plus the court system slowing to a crawl in the meantime? Thank god these hackers don't know how to negotiate.
honestly this helps me to understand finnegan's wake just the smallest bit