If only you knew.

============================================================

Bear with me here because I know this is long, but from a programming perspective, think of it like this:

Imagine that people like Musk and others are right and "chances are" we DO live in a "simulated reality" program.

Eventually inhabitants of this program start realizing "something's not quite right about our program – it's like there's a bug in it or something".

Other inhabitants: "Actually, it only SEEMS like a bug, but in fact, at BEST is a virus purposely introduced into the program by those with less-than-best intentions, and at WORST, it's actually a not-too-often-discussed-in-polite-society core-component of the program itself."

This "way of looking at things" will come in handy when considering the historical relevance of words like "mother" and "board" in reference to its modern applications to things like "computing" (think "fractals").

============================================================

As an undergrad I took a class in a then-burgeoning field of study called "Law & Economics" ... aside from being one of the more interesting classes I took, it introduced 3 theories of law.

Two of them were "the official narrative" and one of them, the "unofficial" less-popular one of the three, was something the professor felt inclined to introduce and talk about because he felt it was important.

The unofficial view was that the legal system was designed as a matter of fact to purposely overwhelm the common man with a tsunami of often self-contradicting laws specifically to bewilder those who felt they were "afforded protection under the law" and had the nerve to actually have trust and faith in it as an institution without the benefit of an "official safari guide", ie, a lawyer.

Now ... what happens if "the common man" is naive enough to believe the legal system is fair and just and affords everyone the same protection?

Let's take a look at history:

Cops are referred to as [L]aw [E]nforcement [O]fficers, and membership in Masonic lodges is quite common and considered an unspoken "side thing" that needs to be attended to in order to advance careers.

This was such a conflict-of-interest-suggesting problem in England that there was a public outcry and in the late 90s they actually passed laws mandating that police in England needed to publicly disclose membership in Masonic lodges so barristers could identify potential conflicts of interest after one too many shady cover-ups; this legal arrangement was predictably met with covert resistance and about a decade later the requirement was waved at the behest of a prominent British politician "because no evidence of corruption or undue influence was discovered" WHEN IN REALITY the EXACT OPPOSITE happened in the history that led up to the introduction to the law ... the only reason such activity waned during the introduction of the law was that police/barristers/judges/politicians who were also masons were "put on blast" in a very public manner.

The height of this "WTF is going on in our society?!?" may very well have been during the "free trial period" of the Parliament version of C-SPAN that C-SPAN offered it's American audience decades ago, during which the highlight was undoubtedly a live-streamed Parliament session held to address an unfortunate loophole that was exploited in British law regarding "freedom of religious expression": a voodoo practitioner used it as a defense argument when the mutilated body of a boy was found floating in the River Thames.

While you would THINK this was an "open-and-shut" voting session, to the bewilderment of some, a member of Parliament actually stood up (despite the insistence of his nearby peers who immediately grabbed him by the sleeves (although a few actually immediately got up and walked away in an effort to distance themselves from him) and unsuccessfully tried to pull him back down to his seat while they could be clearly heard muttering, "WILL you SHUT UP! This is not the time and place for this sort of thing!" before the audio feed got "mysteriously interrupted" for 5-10 seconds.

Despite their insistence, said Parliament member insisted on standing up regardless and started ranting about how "People don't understand" and "since the foundation of civilization itself, certain things have always been (and, by implication, "need to continue to be") done in a "certain way" ..." ("???")

What relevance is this?

To join Masonic lodges one of the requirements is that members need "to be of sound mind".

Sounds "innocent enough" until you sit down and contemplate how that phrase could be abused by people who consider themselves more clever than the common populace ... people like, for example, those of a psychopathic inclination, who have brains structurally-different enough from the general populace that one researcher suggested that the notion of "physical mutation" needs to be re-examined in order to account for mutations in the brain that modern science now allows for the observation of in ways that were not possible when "mutation" was first defined.

For example, "of sound mind" SUGGESTS "mentally balanced" but immediately Masonic instruction introduces candidates to a hint that this is not at all the case.

Early masonic verbal instruction ritual implores the candidate to strive to "do what's right" ... but WRITTEN instruction clearly indicates that they mean to "do what's RITE" as in according to ritual.

If candidate's ask, they are simply told that the word "right" actually was written as "rite" back in the days when Masonic ritual was constructed.

But the problem is that if you actually do any research into the origins of the word "right" ... this explanation is only PARTIALLY true ... the adjective is "riht" and the adverb is "rihte" ... or Germanic origin, not "Olde English" (English in general has a Germanic structure but in this case the word itself is literally Germanic in origin) ... and the word itself stems from the Latin "rectus" ... which "sounds like" ... "wrecked us" ... as in "doing the "right" thing is what wrecked us" ...

To "wreck" is to "ruin" as in "ancient ruins" like the Pyramids of Giza.

This in turn is where one of the supposed origins of what is introduced to candidates as the "Lion's paw" stems from: https://m.facebook.com/Three.Hearts.Church/photos/pat-robert...

The problem, as it relates to the context of this post, is twofold:

(1.) "Lion's" within the context of abusing the "of sound mind" requirement "sounds like" ... "Lyin's" ...

This then introduces yet another issue that the psychopathically-inclined criminal element has been shown to be likely to take advantage of: the word "lying" in English means BOTH to "lie" as in to misrepresent the truth AND to "lie" as in to "lay down".

In Masonic ritual, in the third degree the candidate who is "lying" down (there are too many hidden cryptic messages in the film "Falling Down" to get into here) is "raised up from his dead-state lying" by the "lion's/lyin's /G\R.I.P. to a perpendicular right/rite angle state ... "G" is "seven" so the implication is "(s)even Lion(s) R.I.P." ... but no, the candidate is subliminally instructed that "perhaps even lion(s) R.I.P." but "there is no rest for the wicked" and he is now subconsciously instructed to "stop lying wrong" (flat) and begin a new life where he can start "Lion/lyin'" as a right/"rite" angle/"angel" ... aka "if you're going to do Lion/lyin' stuff, learn to do it the right/rite way.

What does this have to do with anything?

This:

(2.) The "Lion's paw" ... though CLAIMED to be depicted from "ancient Egyptian mystery rites" ... has no basis in this origin myth and instead came about when brothers in Scotland Yard wanted to inform their brethren of this new advancement in crime scene analysis called "fingerprint analysis"; the "Lion's/lyin's paw" thus is a sort of "wink wink" suggestion by Scotland Yard to fellow "members of the craft" that "Look, we're doing this new thing now, so if you're going to do stuff we don't want to know about at places you'll lie about being when things you'll also lie about happened, if you're going to touch things at such scenes, make sure you pick stuff up in the following manner with your knuckles so as to not leave behind fingerprints, because from now on fingerprints will put you at the scene no matter how good you think you may be at "Lion/lyin'" stuff.

As if though THAT wasn't enough to get you to think about the subject matter more skeptically, the presiding authority in England is the United Grand Lodge of England, or "U.G.L.E. Mother (Lodge)" which "sounds like" ... "ugly mother".

As in "[Fre(e/a)K]ali-Ma-sons of the "Ugly Mother" ... aka "Kali" to the Thug/G\33$ ... "Thug(s-even)33$ a cult the British Empire was not only well aware of during it's height but also considered a priority threat (one stationed British officer actually went back and tried to convince prominent members of British politics that if their sophistry-based philosophy were to ever infect British thinking, it would eventually corrupt the British Empire and lead to its ruin).

Thuggees, in turn, believed in a unique philosophy where they saw themselves not as "the bad guys" but rather as "the good guys" who were "doing their victims a unique favor" by helping them "reincarnate to their next life faster" so they could escape the karma of their current life; for taking such a risk in a society that "didn't understand and disapproved of their cult's teachings" they felt they rightfully "deserved a reward" for taking it upon themselves to take a risk and "help" their victims reincarnate to their next life.

What did Thuggees specialize in?

https://www.thesquaremagazine.com/mag/article/202108the-cabl...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Eric_Garner

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_George_Floyd

The above victim was prey to a rather particularly vicious form of "of sound mind" dickery, namely, while EVENTUAL coroner's reports indicated he died of a heart attack most likely from the constant "on-again, off-again" pressure to his carotid artery (which doesn't "seem like" a choke but in fact is a rather advanced, particularly nasty form of a choke that cuts off the supply of blood/oxygen to the brain (https://judoinfo.com/chokes/) and forces the heart to go into overdrive ... then to slow down to regulate BPM when the pressure is released ... then to speed up again when the pressure is put on the artery again ... then to ... and so on ... if you don't think this is such a big deal, if you consider yourself "somewhat athletic", to to a gym with resistance machines and try something called a "Peripheral Heart Training Circuit" ...)

... initial reports indicated he "died from a heart attack while on Fentanyl" AFTER he supposedly "died from a heart attack while on amphetamines" (because after all, when it's legal for you to lie, "fentanyl, amphetamines, same difference, right?") ... AFTER the initial "pre-official" report that he "died from a heart attack "while on crack" (again, when you're LEGALLY allowed to lie in your profession with no clear restriction as to under what circumstances and towards what aims ... amphetamines, crack – same difference, right?).

And here is where the depravity of the "L"aw "E"nforcement "O"fficer who purposely abuse the "Lion/Lyin'" system "of sound mind" comes into play: TECHNICALLY ... they THOUGHT they were going to get away with it because ... he did in fact have (a carotid-artery-choke-induced) heart attack ... "while on crack" ... because as you can see from numerous pictures of the incident ... the neighborhood he was in was poor and the street this incident had taken place on "hadn't been paved in a while" so ... the street was "cracked" and he happened to "technically" ... "be on ("A") crack" when it happened.

Yes, this is how the system is abused in the minds of its worst abusers.

Now as if THIS wasn't enough ... and if you STILL haven't gotten a sense of what is going on from all the "Dancing Coronavirus Nurses" who made dance routines so coordinated even professional entertainers were impressed (https://www.phillyvoice.com/ciara-level-up-jefferson-univers...) all the meanwhile claiming to be "overwhelmed" by "corona victims" all the meanwhile getting REPEATEDLY caught on camera with completely empty emergency rooms/shut down hospitals immediately after "news reports showed people lined up around the block just to get in to be treated for coronavirus" ...

Keep in mind "Anthony Fauci" is an anagram for "A Fun China Toy" (can't make this shit up) ...

Lookup the difference between the "Rod of Asclepius" and "The (Hospital) Staff of Hermes" ...

Hermes is literally, among other things, the "patron deity of thieves" ...

As in why military nurses lent to hospitals were making videos bursting in tears as they suggested that after all the forced unnecessary forced intubations (forced intubations cause tears in lung tissue which then gets more easily infected with Covid) they saw, it's "almost as if" the hospitals "were killing people on purpose" just to get the ~$40,000 bonus for Covid-related deaths PER PATIENT.

Same hospitals, same conditions, some nurses claiming their "so overwhelmed they don't have time to even go to the bathroom" (and yet seem to have enough time to practice highly-coordinated dance routines), meanwhile other nurses who were lent to the hospital by the military put their credibility and careers on the line and with real tears told the public "it's like at best they don't care and are letting people die, and at worst it's like they're killing them on purpose."

Working the system backwards from hospital "Staff" of Hermes/god of thieves to Thuggees to Free(a)Kali-Ma-sons of the "U.G.L.E. Mother Lodge" ... guess what the makeup of the majority of the U.G.L.E. was at the time of its formation?

Would you guess "doctors"?

Edit: not saying all police officers, doctors, nurses, or freemasons are even aware of let alone participate in this "hidden aspect" that seems to a pervasive, though often "under the surface" aspect of their existence, but it's not like there haven't been plenty of testimonies by members all these groups (which historically have intertwined) to the effect of "something's not quite right about this, but I just can't seem to put my finger on exactly what".