skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Maybe look in to sailfish os. It has android app support and so far (almost 3 years) whatsapp has worked for me without issues. Don't know about google maps, haven't tried it but I did install microg and got my bank app to work on it.
If you find yourself relying on Archive.today a lot then I also recommended the "Bypass Paywalls Clean" add-on for Firefox: https://gitlab.com/magnolia1234/bypass-paywalls-firefox-clea....
Not to defend Johnson, but DC has an axe to grind.
CentOS 7 may have been released in 2014, but the software it shipped was already quite old then.

As a datapoint, CentOS Stream 9 [0], which was released in 2021, and which RHEL 9 (released in May 2022) is based on, is already ~60% out of date according to repology: https://repology.org/repository/centos_stream_9.

Also: In computer time, 8 years is "very old". That's longer than the "mainstream support" window for Windows 7 was (from 2009 to 2015), and about as long as the mainstream support window for Windows XP (from 2001 to 2009).

[0]: CentOS "Stream" has a different release model and appears to be a bit of a rolling release as I understand it? But that would cause it to be more up-to-date, not less.
I have three stones in front of my house. I clean them once a year. They do not bother me.

Personally, I don't quite "get" why other Germans seem to personally suffer under the weight of the county's history. I was born in the 1980s, it is obvious that I am not "guilty", but I have no problem feeling responsible to keep the memory alive.

In fact, any reasonable observer will notice that admitting guilt, in the hardest possible terms, has been exceptionally good strategy for the country. Except for the British, and some, but few, Israeli jews, people tend to be impressed with the postwar behavior of the country. Any remnants of fear proved useful to "force" Germany into the Euro and get it of military engagements, although the latter has somewhat stopped.

So whenever I see Turkey, or Hungary, or, to some degree, Austria, trying to deny their respective genocides and/or participation in the Holocaust, it just feels exceptionally stupid! Everybody knows of the Turkish genocide against the Armenians. Denying it is silly and just keeps it alive. Build monuments honoring those you have harmed and the world will love you for it.

(if, that is, you also stop harming more people! wtf is wrong with you? It's not like land is worth anything, these days, or you-know-who would obviously not need more of it).
> What you are talking is intelligence in general that rat are more intelligent than butterflies.

Not necessarily. One human can be more intelligent than another just the same (even if the gap is orders of magnitude smaller, naturally). It doesn't seem obvious to me at all than it implies being more conscious.
If you go with a continuous passing style (which more often than not is relatively "easy") the compiler usually optimize it to replacing/reusing the frame rather than allocating a new one.
We'll because Apple is a way of life. A religion. Religions aren't bad, are they?
So, Apple wants to control what people can run on their devices and Facebook wants to track their users. Both are right about the other on these topics.

As soon as Apple allows / is forced to allow other app stores, if ever, Facebook might tell their users "for the full experience, install Facebook from this alternative app store that allows tracking". It seems to me there's no good ending for this story.

The choice for me is obvious and simple. Avoid both of these companies.
Never thought to use it for fertiliser, but urinating onto a compost heap to speed up the process of creation is pretty common. At least two of the presenters on BBC Radio 4's Gardener's Question Time do it - Bob Flowerdew and Christine Walkden.
The iPhone is unironically the greatest product in human history. It's the most important piece of belonging in a persons life and it's the last thing they'll give up. They can be one misstep away from homelessness but they still buy a new iPhone. This gives Apple an incredible amount of power. The iPhone has built up a ton of goodwill that extends to everything Apple sells.
I recommend testing the Webex Desk camera. If you're a company you can get a significant discount (my company gets ~60% discount afaik).

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/collaborat...
I'm not a big fan of JTB epistemology, either, but you can't help regressing to some sort of common ground in order to make conjectures and refute them.

In order for someone to make a conjecture that A does B, and for someone else to point out that A actually doesn't do B, both parties need to agree on the meanings of A and B, as well as what it means for A to do B, usually by appealing to C, an independent common ground. You climb down as many levels of abstractions as needed until you reach C, because otherwise you're just talking past each other.

Even in a coherentist system, the network of existing beliefs forms the common ground against which questionable beliefs are tested, and some beliefs are held firmer than others. Those beliefs are treated as already justified for the purpose of the current investigation. Few people who talk about consciousness would ever consider denying that they are conscious.
The same reasoning could be applied to many people. You wouldn't deny their consciousness on that ground.

The issue with general AI is like issue with chess. People are not happy when robot can win some games. People can only accept that robot really plays chess, when robot defeated best of the best.

General AI is the same. Looking like some guy is not enough. You need to reason better than smartest human on the planet, only then people will admit that general AI is there. That's a high bar.

You can definitely talk someone to agree that he's not conscious using some logic tricks. Not everyone, for sure, but someone who may be doesn't really care that much about that concept.

You also can tune AI so it'll not agree that he's unconscious no matter what.

What I'm trying to deliver is that there's no easy border which can divide conscious from unconscious. The only border was Turing test and robots passed it. Now you can test whether that particular robot talks like a very smart person, etc. But you can't distinguish bot from some random not-so-smart person.
My experience of consciousness certainly isn't binary. I slip in and out of consciousness when I'm waking up in bed on a weekend all the time. The first person experience is of a very nuanced continuously sliding scale of awareness and cognitive coherence.
It is required to send a sni in clear at every connection? In theory, after the first connection, you should be able to just fully encrypt the entire packet by using the certificate (public key) of the website.
If that is the case, is it possible to "preload" a list of keys into the useragent to avoid having to pass the SNI in clear? I understand that is not always practical, but can it help against censorship?
Any chance this could be ported and used on Android / iOS? There is a Kaldi port for mobile and it works reasonably well.
Nice work! If it will support ASCII export I may stash one of my side projects forever :)

Minor feedback: not all buttons seem to be accessible to keyboard-only users.
I'm just a Vim snob with a browser plugin, but for people who actually can't use a mouse your app seems like it would be perfect for them if you fixed that.

Edit: just making the "shortcuts" button accessible may be sufficient, as that shows how to use the keyboard shortcuts.
I had one device who died after a couple of weeks: suddenly it refused to switch on. So I found the real source of pain from Pinephone project: the assistance. I sent a detailed report about the hardware failure and they sent me a message about how properly recharge the phone , something like : "you need the power supply, insert the plug in the 220V socket, insert the USB-c cable, etc", demonstrating that they didn't read my message at all. After some further rounds of nonsense instructions, that , anyway, I followed giving them feedback about the results, I asked for a replacement. At that point, they started to waste time, another department apparently stepped in. After my complaints, they asked me to send the device back without acknowledgment of receipt, via ordinary post service, in the USA (I'm in Europe and I received the phone from Asia), sending to an anonymous p.o. box. I told them that it was unacceptable because in that way I took all the shipment risks not having any proof that I sent the device nor that the parcel in case of problems. Luckily, I found a post service with proof of shipment, so I had at least a receipt proving I sent the device back. At the end, they refused to send me a replacement, starting to negotiate the amount of the refund, because they wasted so many time I risked to not be able to ask Paypal intervention, I asked Paypal to step in receiving a full refund.
That strikes me as a very US-centric point of view.
Apple's success lies in forcing customers to stay and do as they're told. Come hell or high water.
> Do you discriminate on meat factor?

Yes.
I agree with you. One other point I would like to make is that it seems a lot of decisions are made after a lot of fatigue-inducing processes, which just seem to lead to a lot of compromises nobody really wants, but that also no one wants to rebuke, since the process to arrive to the decision was already too drawn-out.
> core metaphors for the problem space they're working in

> find clear and effective refactor points

> organize code well, etc.

> Static vs. Dynamic has nothing to do with those problems — they all exist in both worlds.

It's interesting because, having converted from Python to Haskell, I find a powerful static type system helps tremendously for those three things.
One of my greatest memories of science class as a kid, was making saltpeter from scratch with a particularly creative teacher. First, we built a latrine and the class pee’d on straw and lime for a couple of months. Then, we boiled the straw in copper pots, poured the liquid into jars, and suspended cotton string in the jars. As the liquid evaporated, saltpeter grew as crystals on the string.
There have been a few cases in the media; though not necessarily focused on feelings of guilt. One couple in Amsterdam¹ lost their child and suffered a strong emotional response whenever people outside would gawk at their house with a solemn look after encountering the Stolperstein placed in the pavement there (they were branded neo-Nazis on social media for daring to speak out).

1: https://www.volkskrant.nl/nieuws-achtergrond/echtpaar-staakt...
I had one person join as a significant contributor for a while early on. Unfortunately life circumstances brought us apart, I only reconnected with them now after many years.

There were a couple other direct contributors to the code, which always made me really happy, but the idiosyncracy of the codebase made it hard for others to contribute more than housekeeping/refactoring.

The rest of the community contributed through lots of in-depth discussions, ideas, what-ifs etc. I'm really grateful for all the interest and thoughtfulness my community always displayed.
There actually are BEPs to manage cross swarms sharing, but I don't know of clients that do handle that. BEPv2 should make this easier though, because each file has their own hashes on top of the top-level hash.
In the spirit of beneficial discussion: Nowhere I implied that that was a majority opinion with Jews. It was - however - a popular opinion of influential members of Jewish organisations within Munich, back when the ban was originally enacted.
If you manage the documents on OneDrive, you can use the document revisioning on OneDrive. (GDrive has it too, I think, for that matter)
Huge thanks for the suggestion, bought it and be reading it - first book I've read properly in a few years, and loving it.
Oh ok, that's more clear.

So it happens at a higher level, in application management etc...

And then, why aren't those pinephone OS doing it better?
In the UK, the population is still suffering the effects of the Victorian culture and the British Empire.
In the case of Facebook, whole societies and the psychology of the masses have been negatively effected. So them being in a strong position harms society and individuals alike. - In the case of Apple we are talking about a company that dominates a market and harms its competitors and has the power to be the gatekeeper. Yes, that‘s power that should be limited, but it‘s a company that produces goods that their customers love. I don‘t see any harm in their products and services at all. Au contraire.
To my mind, I think that if you want to say that the universe is a computer, then you can't say it's doing linear algebra, even though the behavior of particles is described by linear algebra.

If you want to model the universe as a computer, than its basic operations are the interactions described in the Standard Model, and the symbols it works on are particles&fields that exist. But the universe computer is not resolving a linear algebra equation to decide what happens when an electron emits a photon. Instead, the electron emitting a photon with some energy etc. is one of the elementary operations of the universe computer.

Coming back to the CPU example, a basic operation in a CPU is setting a bit to 1. That operation is not divisible into any other more elementary operations from the point of view of modeling the physical CPU as a computer. Of course, there are other physical phenomena going down to the SM that are the realization of this basic operation, but those are not part of the modeling: the CPU computer, as a model, works by flipping bits.

Similarly, for QM, the universe computer works by doing one of the possible interactions from the standard model. As far as we know, there is no layer of detail underneath this, even if the interactions of the standard model are indeed linear algebra.

One important way in which saying "the universe is computing linear algebra" is wrong is that, as far as we know, the universe is instantly calculating the solutions of the linear equations - the electron doesn't go into an "emitting" state, then emit a photon with the appropriate values some time later after the computation is finished.
The Suwałki Gap
The way I did it in Citybound is to assume that the graph constantly changes anyways (also because the player can add/remove roads quite rapidly) and route the cars more like packets on the internet than with static A*-ish algorithms.

That way, road nodes can propagate changes locally.
I use Discord, some really good programming and AI communities are in it.

But I use it in a container tab in FF. I have uBlock Origin installed.

I don't trust the electron client to respect my privacy.
> The iPhone is unironically the greatest product in human history

Which "products" are you comparing iPhone to that makes you believe it's the greatest product in human history? Granted, human history is not that long in perspective, but I can think of countless of other things that are "greater", so curious what your perspective is on this.
> This is not true. Computing is a system where the physical hardware (the computer) is following rules that are explicitly encoded in itself - you can analyze the system and discover where and how the program it is following is encoded (as we did with DNA).

1) No. The rules are just physics. Electric signals going through physical material.

2) Why is this event relevant? I can say the same about water pipes in a sweage system . The way the water moves through pipes is encoded in the design and connections of the pipes. You can inspect it to figure out how it behaves.

I've yet to see a model of consciousness that does not imply that the sewage system is conscious.
Gold Rush California Was Much More Expensive Than Today’s California (2015)
What is TFA and DAG?

TFA could be Two Factor Authentication, but it does not really fit and I prefer to use 2FA. Searching online yields Database Availability Group for DAG, but I prefer to ask.
What people know is just practical knowledge of their immediate surrounding and a bit of theoretical models of what is outside.
If by "knowing what they are doing" you mean deep understanding of everything from the big picture then it's impossible.
Doing your own local stuff as good as possible is the best we can get and it usually works reasonably well. Until we get a dictator in an information bubble, but well that's just life.
If you can't enforce your license how is choosing a different license helping you?

After a quick glance I thought I might use this for a project of mine but NC-SA definitely killed my interest in this. I'm not a local corporation trying to get rich, but "NonCommercial" is an absolute minefield, left vague on purpose[1].

I've seen this sort of licensing on free game assets like Warsow and I think they work there (after all, the main use is to scare people away from re-using them at all) and I really wonder why something like AGPL wouldn't work better in this case.

1. https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/NonCommercial_interpre...
While I agree that there are certainly different interests and other various non-nefarious reasons for why we won’t get a 50/50 gender division in all possible fields, I’d suggest you rethink the idea that women can’t handle stress.

For one thing, nursing is usually almost exclusively women and I don’t think that can be called a stress free environment.
I agree, this seems analogous to the argument that simulation of the weather can't produce rain. In some sense, that argument is true by prior definition. It's like saying that the Universe can't simulate itself.

But consciousness is not rain. We don't really know what consciousness is, so I don't see a compelling reason to exclude computation as being sufficient to produce it.

We need philosophers to tell us that consciousness is before we start saying what it's not.
"It's the most important piece of belonging in a persons life"

I'm a long term Apple user and but I think this is rather overstating things - do people really feel so strongly attached to what is, after all, a manufacturer of rather nifty gadgets, not a way of life.
> be that most people don’t know exactly how they are going to execute their long term plans

That’s “not knowing what you’re doing” and not really different from “fake it until you make it” either.

If you don’t have a really concrete plan to achieve a certain goal, you quite literally don’t know what you’re doing.
I live in one of these houses and don't mind. Most of the time, you don't even think about it. In the few moments you do, it's just a reminder of what can go wrong.
I would expect most people to be more productive during a meeting if they can't use their phone at the same time...
lol, I think plumbing is the greatest product in the human history. It prevents us from getting sick and die, which is way more important than a slightly better mobile phone.
Maybe you should make this clearer to your readers?
Powerful company complains competition is too powerful, needs regulators to take sides.

The issue of wether or not tech companies are too powerful should be one of "The People" vs these companies and we collectively decide what should be and should not be allowed.

Facebook's only interest is reducing any competitors power as much as possible and whilst their argument might have a point, they might not have a point.

This discussion needs to happen and if necessary laws changed but I feel Facebook spearheading this weakens the points made due to their clear conflict of interest.

We as a society need to decide if the benefit of these large tech companies in their current state is truly worth the societal cost.

Facebook being involved in such a fundamental discussion dilutes its importance.

Also funny Facebook calling out another company as too powerful when they have one of the largest databases of personal information that has ever existed. Arguably much larger than the personal information Apple has collected on the world’s population.
> Google with Chrome

Or, you know, Android.
It's not uncommon to have memorials in places where they are very much present in every day life, e.g.:

https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_verwoeste_stad
A statue remembering the bombing of Rotterdam, in a busy place in the centre of Rotterdam.

https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bagage_(Leiden)
A monument in multiple pieces remembering deportation. Most of them are placed in residential areas, in full view of the people who live there.
Apple doesn't harm your mental health or facilitate threats to democracy though. They just want your money, and they'll sell you beautiful gadgets to get it.
I'm guessing that the sub-editor, inspired by legal, added the question-mark at the end of this headline.

To everyone pointing out the hypocrisy, please read the whole article. The balance of blame and level of mutual hypocrisy is established pretty early, and reiterated throughout.
Apple is not in control of your credit cards - it just allows you to use them more conveniently. And for photos and music, and even passwords there are alternative services, no one forces you to use Apple provided ones.
i bought one with a keyboard case, and I love it. the software definitely still has some rough edges, and I wouldn't try to use it as a phone yet, but as a little pocket computer it's kind of awesome. and it's full linux, you can install apache on it, you can compile stuff, you can use vim, whatever you want. GUI applications that haven't been mobile optimized aren't always perfect, but often surprisingly usable (especially with the keyboard) - e.g. i like to use mednaffen to play emulated games on the train on it, and it works pretty darn well for something that isn't even supposed to work at all at that resolution.
All AI learning is tacit learning
>Ice cream may be culturally significant, I just haven’t heard it called a comfort food before.

That's strange, a famous pop cliché is "crying eating icecream from the tub watching movies on the couch".
(Disclaimer- worked at an ayahuasca retreat and have drank 150+ times)

Ayahuasca with proper support is very beneficial for a lot of people. Some other therapies (someone mentioned EMDR which is excellent, also somatic experiencing) are incredibly synergetic with it. They are very good at showing you the root of the issue, but they are absolutely not magic. It takes quite a bit of courage to go in and face yourself and to do the necessary work. Often the work doesn't start until after the ceremony finishes and you're back in "real life".

I've seen a lot of positive change from plant medicine. I've also seen a lot of people rebound back in to darkness after failing to do something with the message they got (after an initially positive experience)
This seems like a legal-enough scheme:

- Take people's money to form [insert random Crypto bank-like scheme]

- Invest the money into high-risk investments

- If investments don't pay off, declare bankruptcy. You were gambling with someone else's money

- If investments do pay off, you're rich. You just need to return other people's money, but you keep the upside

There are a ton of schemes like this in traditional investing, but limited to scamming "sophisticated investors" or "accredited investors," depending on the scheme. For crypto, it seems like regulation hasn't caught up, and companies scam random consumers.

By "legal enough," I mean legal enough that scammers can convince themselves they won't land in prison.