skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sweeping reforms are needed. The main one is to stop considering inmates as a source of income. Make rehabilitation a primary goal. The other one is to prohibit criminal background checks except very narrow cases. Sure there will be people who never reform. But the nature of their crimes will mostly keep them in prisons anyways.

And yes there will be some price to pay.
Who cares? Nothing is part of Linux. It’s part of Ubuntu.
There is still a risk of them being unhappy even if you pick it yourself.
More pertinently, it's not producing.
Understanding Security Issues in the NFT Ecosystem
ok, i'm curious, could you elaborate on what literary sources/narratives are you referring to?
are those one the lines of "Gun, germs and steel" for example(criticised for floating inaccurate narratives)?
So let see if I understand your position:

It's not okay for a small group of employees to try to impose their chosen morality, but it's okay for one person to impose his own morality on the whole company, because he owns the controlling interest in it.

More importantly, that same person who owns the controlling interest has no responsibilities or obligations towards the company as a whole.

Did I get that right?

And while we're on the topic of what each of us finds ridiculous, how about the fact that whenever someone suggests that a publicly traded company should do something slightly idealistic, people always bring up fiduciary duty towards the shareholders, but it gets overlooked when we're talking about one billionaire's "right" to drive his company's value into the ground by shitposting on social media, because "he's the owner, he can do what he wants".

Regardless of all that, one point that keeps being overlooked -- and at this stage of discussion, where it has been pointed out repeatedly, it's pretty obvious that it's being overlooked on purpose -- is that they're not trying to impose any morality. They're asking for two things: 1) hold Musk accountable for harming the company, 2) define what "no-asshole" and "zero tolerance" policies actually mean and enforce them.

That's not morality. That's common sense and consistency.

EDIT: Also, what's more likely to bring the company morale go down: seeing its owner sabotage it because of his ego, or an internal letter criticizing him for doing that?
This is all true. So for the times you end up there, wouldn’t you prefer a tool to surface for you the things you were going to have to spend hours digging for?
I think if you used this in the original design, a banana length is nothing for the reward of total silence.
A genius plan indeed. If he can get the AI to write his papers, he'll never have to stop being on sabbatical.
New buildings have strict fire separation requirements that pretty much enforces sound proofing. All new build high rises I have stayed in have had total silence.
> Being unhappy with capitalism is being in denial about the world having scarce resources.

Food and shelter are not scarce resources. In the United States, we have more empty homes than homeless people. Every day we throw away an obscene amount of food.

So again, I say any system that requires the existence of a class of people who cannot afford these things in order to function is morally untenable. Similar shitty arguments were made in defense of slavery 200 years ago.

Communism isn't the only possible answer. Welfare programs are a common solution. The way I see it though, welfare is just the taxpayer subsidizing unlivable wages. So why not cut out the tax middleman and make the employers pay livable wages to begin with? Either way, that money has to get moved from the top to the bottom.
I went for extreme volatility which basically killed everything in a 100 months.

100% unemployment, nothing produced.

Might be a lesson there.
That's so inspiring. Alex gives advice that might as well be about programming and the fear of starting a complex project. Don't look back or ahead, just this move is easy, this move is easy and you will get there!
Hey! Cool language. Well done
Free speech doesn't entail an obligation to subsidize people attacking you or your company. Trying to get people employed by other companies fired would be a problem, but firing your own employees for acting against your interests is completely reasonable.
The probes for this scope are out of the reach of hobbyists!

Get a 100MHz 4 Channel Hantek for $400 and it will do almost everything you can wrap your head around. Wires start looking like waveguides at 1GHz, much less 110GHz (That's almost infrared!).
The language creator(s) don't appear to have pretentions of displacing the entire world. Look at this quote:

"Vale is powerful enough to use, and it feels really good to finally use Higher RAII in a real-life program. It's an incredibly versatile and valuable pattern, one that I hope Vale will bring into the mainstream!"

Bring [Higher RAII] to the mainstream. It's a sandbox to experiment with a composition of ideas in the hope that some of these ideas influence the 'mainstream' including, perhaps, D.

The number of new, fast, safe (for some value of safe) native languages that are appearing is amazing. I think this is down to powerful tools for creating native languages. We're in a new era of language development; the yawning gulf between C/C++ and the world of managed/scripting languages is being rapidly filled. This shouldn't be discouraged with "why not just make my preferred thing better?" Eventually it will.
The strategy of buying 5-15 year old cars and expecting reliability didn't used to work. Cars from the 1960s to the early 1990s were generally trashed after 5 or 10 years.

Modern engines and drivetrains are a miracle and the kind of crippling electrical problems you used to get in a chrysler or a BMW are basically solved.

Even tyres seem indestructible compared to 30 years ago.

I drive 10-15 year old cars but the older ones before that were nowhere as durable as the two we have now.
I don't understand all the negative comments. Because it seems indeed to be the case that Polar bears are not doing that bad over the last 20 years [1]. Is climate warming a problem for Polar bears? Yes, definitely! But much less than we think. By far the biggest cause of the decline of Polar bears in the last century has been hunting. Only when Polar bears were put on the endangered list, and hunting was reduced, the Population have been increasing again. [3] Now that Polar bears are not hunted anymore, the melting ice becomes their prime problem. But Polar bears have survived warming climates in the past [4]. They are smart animals that have adapted to many different climates in the past and one could, arguably, assume that they could survive this one as well [5]. I'm not saying that it doesn't matter if the North pole melts. But it seems not to be as big of a treat for Polar bears as we believe it is.

[1] - https://fee.org/articles/the-myth-that-the-polar-bear-popula...

[2] - https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Annual-estimates-of-the-...

[3] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_bear#Hunting

[4] - https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21528754-600-hardy-po...

[5] - https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1210506109
Agrivoltaics are a little more expensive, but produce revenue in fallow fields.

Farmers have grown used to changing their behavior, in recent centuries. The successful ones today did. The successful ones tomorrow will have.

Laws can be changed. In Colorado, they were already. Others will follow.
SAT solvers are used in package managers to resolve dependencies.

SAT solver is a tool that determines whether a given boolean formula can be True (it is called SAT) or not. If it can be True, a SAT solver provides values for variables so that you can check that they are correct.

For example, a Boolean formula

a & (b | c)

Can be True if a = True, b = True and c = False.

SAT solver can be useful for resolving dependencies in a package manager. Imagine if a user wants to install package A with version >= 1.0, but package A depends on other packages and might conflicts with some packages as well. The package manager converts these requirements into a boolean formula like this: let's say that if variable A₁₀ is True, then package A version 1.0 is installed, if A₁₁ is True, then package A version 1.1 is installed and so on.

First, let's express user's desire to have any version of A installed. Here is the rule:

A₁₀ | A₁₁ must be True

Let's say A version 1.0 requires B version 1.0 or 1.1. We can then write a rule, that if A 1.0 is installed, then B 1.0 or 1.1 must be installed as well:

!A₁₀ | (B₁₀ | B₁₁) must be True

Now, let' say that B 1.0 conflicts with C 1.0 and both cannot be installed at the same time. We can express that as a formula as well:

!(B₁₀ & C₁₀) must be True

Finally, we cannot install two versions of the same package, so let's write that too:

!(A₁₀ & A₁₁) & !(B₁₀ & B₁₁) must be True

Now we can combine all the rules into a single formula. All the rules must be true, so we join them using AND operator:

(A₁₀ | A₁₁) & (!A₁₀ | (B₁₀ | B₁₁)) & !(B₁₀ & C₁₀) & !(A₁₀ & A₁₁) & !(B₁₀ & B₁₁)

Now we can give the formula to the SAT solver. If will solve it and give a set of versions that need to be installed in order to satisfy all requirements. Or it will prove that this is impossible.

Another use of SAT solver is verification of programs: if you have two pieces of code without loops and you want to make sure that they are equivalent, you can convert them into boolean formulas and use SAT to prove that for any given input they produce the same output.
if you haven't used rust, its definitly going to be new territory for you. The borrow checker doesn't exist in any other language and its an incredibly bovel abstraction for proving an absence of race conditions or memory leaks.

That said, its not easy to master. normally when I start learning a programming language, my toy problem of choice for a taste of the language is to implement a merge sort.

with elixir -> 1 day
swift -> 1 day
rust -> 1 week.

rust is significantly harder to learn that any other language I've picked up. including js when I was first learning to code. Its worth it once you start getting it in your head.

Anyways, languages evolve and go out of date anyways. As you know, sql is not going away. I consider it one of the foundational knowlege things. where it doesn't go out of date. I think the next big thing in the course is ML. the libraries might change but the math doesn't. Time invested in learning ml and ai are a long term value generating asset.

just my 2 cents
> Totally fair on the implying bias strictly on the journalist (which may or may not be there).

But it's not.

You were correct to call out their bias and tactics, as journalists have written hit pieces on various companies in the past and have earned scrutiny over how they present data.

I don't feel like you should need to backpedal on your astute observation just because someone points out a bs excuse scenario like they might have kids to pick up from school.

It is literally a journalist's job to gather and present accurate data, hopefully without bias. I don't think it is too much to ask of them, no matter the circumstances.
> And they have claimed in the past to have done UX testing with actual users.

How many testers were there and how were they selected? Are they representative of gnome's current and future user bases?

I think I read once that their test group was basically the developers and their mediate friends. If so, then this is not how you do UX testing.
Why people can't get it that passwords are plain stupid? I for once use the same password Azcbnm1]{} for all these websites requiring strong passwords. I don't care if my password has been leaked. Eventually all passwords are leaked.
Rear Admiral
Go has GC and a runtime, which this might not have?
My Excellent Conversation with Marc Andreessen
It's pretty easy to reason about that particular example if you have a type system. In a simply typed language, "f f x" is just a type error, so it doesn't do anything. In the polymorphic lambda calculus, the typing will force f to either be the identity, meaning that "f f x = x", or it will be a constant function, so you just replace "f f" with the constant.
as long as vendors are presenting the results of their own products, I'd expect them to de-normalize and tune the queries to leverage every advantage their engine can possibly bring to bear on the benchmark's problem set - so long as they're transparent about what they did. Clickhouse apparently does quite well on TPC-DS according to: https://aavin.dev/tpcds-benchmark-on-clickhouse-part2/ but I'd love to see a more official result that the CH engineers would stand behind.
I really dislike this Keynesian line of thinking. It helps Governments print away to glory and have no accountability. You'd only save to an extent, because you have to fulfill your hierarchy of needs. Prices ultimately will reflect supply and demand, and your paycheck will too, not necessarily leaving a huge buffer to invest and save in gold. That's similar to how wages today aren't anywhere close to long term subsistence worthy for the common folk. I admit it may not be as simple as that, but there was a world before fiat printing where gold worked as a harder form of money. It worked for 1000s of years. Everybody thinks that inflation at 2% is healthy etc, but if let to their own devices, tech, food etc. is deflationary and would be substantially cheaper.
ClickToTweet: The easiest way to promote, share and track your content on Twitte
If you have to convince someone that they should drop those bad requirements, try to show them parts of Per Thorsheim's NDC Security 2022 talk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKP-nv2Oqdg
This makes as much sense as saying a United Airlines jet is a public forum, and your rights are being trampled on if you can't take a shit in the aisle.

Both are private property.
Dry panels get hotter than wet ones can.
White House says discussing 'irresponsible' tariffs imposed by Trump
In academia, a "sabbatical" means you take some time off from teaching courses, advising students and doing administrative work so you can concentrate on your research. So in order to stay on sabbatical, he'd need to get the AI to do that other stuff.
> At incident.io, our engineering team runs on-call Friday-to-Friday, with a 5pm handover. This works great for us: as an engineer coming off the pager you get to finish work nice and early on a Friday and enjoy your evening. [0]

[0]: https://incident.io/guide/on-call/compassionate-on-call/

Is this an American thing? 5pm is not “nice and early on a Friday”! 4pm is about what time you should be finishing, and 3pm is “nice and early”.

Love, Australia x
Time to lift Trump’s tariffs on China to fight inflation
I mostly responded to interest rate rate of change on my first run and got 443189.
Not the person you're replying to, but I think it was supposed to be Digg and got autocorrected.
Nevermind, you're right. I've always thought it was without the shift on Firefox.

Sorry for the misinformation
Uselessly, unless you have only a few people to move. Then, taxis work better.
Business-as-usual. Day-to-day operations etc
Fedora 36 KDE Spin for digital painting workstation: reasons, post-install guide
Soundshader
Just remember; in big companies you’re nothing more than a cost, to be replaced by automation. They don’t want you.
Nanolayr has a developed product (spun nano-fibres) that has ridiculous acoustic performance for its thickness/weight. The path to market for these sorts of product is long.

https://www.nanolayr.com/product/sonolayr/
In masse hiring freezes and layoffs affect stock market forward earnings expectations and consumer's disposable incomes to fuel the economy & GDP growth
Yeah, that's rough, but you really should know what a binary tree is if you want to be a software engineer. It's probably a good idea to study data structures and algorithms a bit more.
They tell you averages, which can be useful. Stats about cycles are also useful.
Does GTK work for targetting mobile platforms, like your parent wanted?
If you need this equipment, you're not a hobbyist.
Also, English has a very large number of loan words from other languages.

So you're dropping words from other languages in English all the time.

Avatar, mantra, juggernaut, kindergarten, zeitgeist, and many, many others.
I want a master cheatsheet for gnome commands too. These are some of the commands I needed to memorize when working with gnome:

nautilus <-> File Manager

evince <-> Document Viewer

eog <-> Image viewer

baobab <-> Disk Usage Analyzer
The game only has one shock per scenario. But in a negative supply shock scenario, the game expects you to increase interest rate higher than the inflation rate, to maintain a positive real interest rate, to stop inflation from spiraling out of control.
> I mainly use Python and SQL

Learning how to write fast (as in performance) software. So optimizing memory usage, parallel (SIMD/GPU) computing and microarchitecture optimizations.
Hwe (Cyrillic)
Maybe explain how OSL can establish an upper bound on age? It looks impossible to me, except where you can prove the sample was undisturbed.
Well, I don't need one.
RC isn't there to protect you from vulnerabilities though. It's there to let you share ownership. There's some side benefits in that regard, but the latter can't substitute for the former except in cases where the former is unnecessary to begin with.

As an analogy, imagine comparing a safety knife, a kitchen knife, and (a safe version of?) an axe with each other, and touting how much lighter/safer/whatever the first one is compared to the others. Of course that's correct, and you can make the comparison, but there isn't (or at least shouldn't be?) a huge market of people out there using an axe in the kitchen who could've just used a knife instead, so it's a weird choice of a market to sell an otherwise-great product to.

(And thanks for clarifying the single-threaded aspect.)
This looks great. Care to share some details of your approach? Opensource some bits of it maybe to attract attention of fellow developers?
No, compiling JIT like Java/.NET/V8 becomes real cpu machine instructions on the fly.

Compiling to .pyc files is still byte code that later the python interpreter will read in what is more or less a gigantic while(true)switch/case (operation_type). What you save with pyc compilation is just the text parsing of the source code.

How dynamic the language is, does however affect how feasible it is to do JIT compilation and here python has done itself a big disfavor of simply being too dynamic. Some attempts at JITing it have been done before (pypy, ironpy), usually by nerfing the language a bit to get rid of the most dynamic parts - something that is probably for the better anyway.
How about data that doesn't come directly from union activists.

It's funny the groups that claim to be non-partisan while simultanously advocating a list of positions...
As both a writer and an editor, tools like this are essential. Most writing is done in the context of an organization, like a publication or company. Those organizations have style rules. Rules for things like US or UK spelling, for usage questions where there is no single correct answer. Maybe they start with the Chicago Manual of Style, but add custom rules. Maybe it's the New York Times Manual of Style and Usage. It's just like a style checker for code. It frees writers and editors from having to worry about details to focus on the important and difficult aspects of writing.

What details? Things like "do you use 's for possessives even for a word/name ending in s, or is it s'?" or "oxford comma or no?". Writers argue over these just like programmers argue over tabs v spaces or the place of braces. Sure, if you're just blogging for personal use, go crazy, don't worry about a consistent style, do what you want. When writing for publication, instead of arguing over whether or not it's ok to use certain slang or contractions, the editors just chose a preferred way.

Tools like Vale streamline the process of aligning to a style, just like coding style checkers and autoformatters relieve programmers of the tedium fixing up all the indentation manually.
If anyone wants the YouTube link for the above: https://youtu.be/-VuXIgp9S7o

You can thank me later.
My theory is tech downturns are more fun because it flushes out the people who were only there for the money, leaving those truly passionate about technology.

But it’s also possible I’m just older and more jaded.
> We have reduced the time for the computation by ~119%!

You can say 100% faster when you are talking about speed. You can't say 100% faster when you are talking about duration. "Reduced the time" is talking about duration.
Oh man that “whoops” brings me back.
> Amazon adopts the explicit policy of not wanting their workers to stay on long enough to figure out that they are getting a bad deal.

Surely they stay on exactly long enough to figure that out. It is, after all, presumably why they leave.
Rohde & Schwarz has the ZVA, but that's a two port unit while Keysight has 4. I haven't seen anyone else come close.

As for hobbyists... I'd love to hear of a hobby project that could make use of this.

Edit: Yeah, I'm thinking of the Keysight PNA-X which is a four port VNA. Still haven't seen anything come close to either offering, though.
There is a detailed debunking on YT.

It does make a dumb mistake insisting centrifugal gravity on the way wouldn't work
Then you will use hydrogen in cases where mass is more important than volume.
Oh, but we let people say "acceleration is faster". It's like we've reserved 'faster' for a single derivative and banned it for all the others.
Ex-Amazon Worker Convicted in Capital One Hacking
> You know that feeling when you see something stunning, but you just can’t afford to pay fully right now and you’d really hate to load it onto the credit card?
> It’s awful.

“Awful”. Really? Please, let’s not mince words, let’s even call it the greatest tragedy in history…

Come on, all it takes is a little self control. If you see something that “costs 499 but you only have 323$ In your account”, then you really shouldn’t be buying it at all. It’a not “awful”. It’s consumerism and poor money management.
I agree, though it's not as bad as something like FLTK. Also if you're writing Go there are basically no alternatives.

Still, kind of boggles my mind why some GUI toolkit authors put so much effort into a project but don't do the relatively small amount of work to make it look nice so people will actually want to use it.

It wouldn't take much more than fixing the margins and padding to be honest.
...jointly owned by the central banks who make use of it. Seems fairly innocuous and the obvious way to structure such an organisation.
They could disapprove it. Maybe elect better government, first?
I've been working on documentation a lot. Nobody seems to want to do it, yet everyone seems to want more.

Everyone can write docs fine, just the way everyone can write code fine. But good docs are a lot of work. The ones that people understand at a glance, instead of having to crawl around. This is something that Google and Oracle can't do, so I don't expect it to be easy.

Also just writing better code. Declarative programming is very easy to read and modify, but can be difficult to think in that way if you're not used to it.
Which filter are you seeing HOA in? I can't seem to find it in the slur filter on their Github [1]

[1]: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/blob/0.16.5/config/config....
Obviously it will relate to complexity in deep learning but I can't resist thinking about some AI models involving quantum computation stuffs :-)
Anyone have a link to the slides from the video?
This is actually not a problem right now because soon eth will be mined via proof of stake.
I would value your analysis of the specific scheme detailed there.
Most probably, you need some sort of government approval to buy it.
For almost every separate IDE there is a plug-in for IntelliJ that gives it the same functionality.