skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> They literally said at 2:30 on the may report they will not raise the rates by 3/4ths. The exact second he said that the stock market went up 1 trillion. Today they raised it by 3/4ths

You didn't provide any sources, but if I extend the benefit of the doubt.

1. Sounds like they didn't need to raise the rate in may. Not suspicious.

2. The markets react. Not suspicious.

3. Sounds like they did need to raise the rate in June. Not suspicious.

> They don’t need to whisteblow when they are convinced a healthy stock market is a healthy economy. Why is Powell bringing up the stock market when his job has nothing to do with the stock market at all

I dont know why - but it's you saying that, not him. You're convinced that green hats are useful for baseball pitchers, but baseball stats have nothing to do with your job. See, I can make up conspiracy theories too. Did you see how much the stock value of green hat companies rose recently? Rather coincidental for your pitcher theory, isn't it? Mindblowing.
Metamask presents a large red warning when a user is prompted to sign a raw transaction, and they’re planning on deprecating that part of the API, so hopefully that helps.
I find myself experiencing a bit of both: I want people to read the things I write -- but not really; I want them to know the ideas I write and to credit me for them -- but only if they're good ideas! If everyone just forgets all the stupid things I ever write and that I ever said or did anything stupid, that'd be great.

Similarly, I want to know the criticism so I can incorporate it into my thinking -- but I don't want to be criticized. :)
Show HN: I made a game based on mazes
> I was a kid during the 80s when gas was (comparatively) cheap.

The 1980s are funny, because, the early 1980s were one of the periods of highest sustained gas prices in history, while the late 1980s and 1990s are the lowest ever.
Yes, you make a good point. A decent chunk of the size of an engine like mJS or Elk (or XS) is the parser or bytecode compiler (XS and mJS use a bytecode compiler like Microvium but the compiler is designed to run on-device and so contributes to the ROM size by default). Microvium in some sense "cheats" by not having this built into the runtime engine.

From a purely practical standpoint though, how much does that matter? If you want to run JavaScript on a microcontroller and mJS works for your situation, then maybe Microvium will also work for your situation but will do it with less RAM and ROM overhead and more language features. The practical difference is that the build or release or deployment process for your scripts now includes an extra step. Whether you can afford that extra step depends on your situation.

From a philosophical perspective, it’s an interesting question. A Microvium app actually starts running at “compile-time” and a snapshot of the running VM state is downloaded to the target MCU to continue executing where it left off. From the perspective of the running app process, Microvium does support the `import` of JavaScript source text modules (and therefore also parsing), but it just loses that capability when the VM is moved from the compile-time host to the runtime host. So, the small runtime engine doesn’t support it, but Microvium as a whole does support it. I guess this goes back to the practical question of whether your particular application needs `eval` or dynamic `import` at runtime (post-snapshot).

You also brought up the handling of edge cases, which is a good point. No engine has 100% ECMAScript compliance, so it’s a matter of degree of nonconformity, but engines like Elk, mJS and Microvium are particularly far from compliant. Originally I didn’t call Microvium a JS engine (I called it an engine for JS-like scripts, or something like that) but I changed when I saw how other engines with similar capabilities and restrictions are calling themselves JS engines.
Yup. The key point is, a weapon system becomes obsolete when something else does its job better, not when it becomes more vulnerable. When something valuable becomes more vulnerable, you protect it better. When it becomes less valuable because something else does the job better, then you get rid of it.

As of right now, nothing does a ground offensive like a few dozen tanks advancing at top speed with appropriate support. They'll blast anything in their path and charge right through all but the toughest and most concentrated defenses. As long as you can see those really concentrated defenses in advance and go around, they're pretty tough to stop.
The 50.03% is specifically US traffic; for global traffic, it's 36.89%.
"make", but who owns the patents
Do you think Ukraine can persuade Putin to call off the invasion? If they didn’t defend themselves, they’d be a Russian province or puppet state today.

That’s always the unfortunate downside of relying on only persuasion. Some people will just take what they want if you don’t force them to stop.

Just read about how well persuasion (aka “appeasement”) worked in the buildup to WW2. Spoiler: it didn’t.
Sure, I'll clarify. Do you have objections to it as laid out on Wikipedia? If you have something that you think more accurately delineates its tenets, I'll address that instead.

I will give you a full answer once we've agreed on a concise explanation of it that you stand by, but the short version is that it mistakes effect for cause and assumes stability in various factors while undermining the bases for that very stability.
AFAICT, your question doesn't make sense. But I guess you are thinking, "what if we should be using the TAIL_CALL syntax for performance but most people don't, and it's exarbated inside a tight loop?" If so, I'll try to explain:

TCO is not about making code faster, it's about making it not eat up all the (stack) memory. It's a memory, not speed, optimization[1]. (OK, using less memory does make it somewhat faster (even when not swapping), too, due to fewer memory accesses, but it's usually not a big difference, and not what we worry about; what we worry about is eating up so much memory that the computer starts swapping because of it, yes, at that point it would become much slower, but that doesn't happen with "small data in a loop"...let me finish.)

Not using the TAIL_CALL syntax in a tail recursion would use up the stack memory iff the recursion is deep (in this context because the data is not small).

If "inside a loop" in your question means, a self-recursive function call (tail recursion),

function foo(...) {
if ... {
foo(...)
}
}

then the answer would be, if it's on small data, it only uses a small amount of stack space. No problem. The problem only comes up if the data is large.

If "inside a loop" means that you're using a for or similar loop syntax:

for ... {
foo(...)
}

then a call to a function inside that loop is not actually a tail call (so the compiler would report an error if you were to use the TAIL_CALL syntax), since at least the test in the loop has to run after returning from the function call.

Does that make sense?

[1] And the memory is only being used until the end condition in the recursion is met, i.e. temporarily; it doesn't contribute to bloat, just uses memory for a bit then releases it again; except when it uses so much memory that you run out of RAM (or stack space if the VM limits stack space separately).
You’re completely ignoring infrastructure. No serious debate of a green future precludes nuclear in the next 30–50 years.
This is just bad faith after bad faith. If you say something bad about someone either back it up or don’t say it. I want to hear why Elizabeth Warren is bad so I can decide for myself, otherwise your comment is the equivalent of saying nothing. It contains zero information.
> holding cash at 0%

as consumer prices are surging this no longer may be true

my bet is on physical assets: guitars, gold, watches
Note any more: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PSAVE

And the rate is lower than trend as well: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PSAVERT
Facts can't be copyrighted.
Would likely require a form of NFT that's a little different and probably more complex than the current forn. Something about having the car key also be a cryptographic key, and transfers of the NFT invalidating keys or requiring rotation.
All connecting a wallet does is allow the app to see your public keys. Private keys are not directly exposed. The app can then request the user sign transactions, but they must be explicitly approved by the user.

Where fraud typically happens is when a user thinks they're signing an innocuous transaction, when in fact they're signing a malicious one. This is generally a hard problem, but it's very clear from the wallet the address of the smart contract your transaction interacts with.
Drones fly pretty high and usually avoid contact with the enemy, and if there's trouble, they can easily flee and come back later. For on-the-ground vehicle, one need to stay much closer to the enemy, and if something goes wrong, the opportunities for fleeing are much harder to come by. You certainly don't need to physically be on top of the tank to jam - there are military systems that can disrupt communications in a wide area. And, probably, just dumping something non-transparent on whatever it uses to acquire visual information would work too. There would be nobody to come out and clean it up - a trivial task for a human, much harder for the robotic drone. Humans are very flexible, robots aren't, at least not until we get some AI going. And tbh, if we have such an AI, I'm not sure we really want to give it a tank to drive around.
Eget – Easily install prebuilt binaries from GitHub
" With GPS guided artillery, and omnipresent drone threats, the days of infantrymen defending trench lines in the open are over."

But you aware, that there are currently many infantrymen digging and defending trenches in the ukraine?
(partly allmost equipped like in WW2)

What little russia has of precisiom ammunition is reserved for more valuable targets, than infantry. They just get shelled by dumb artillery. Lots of it.
CharIN Officially Launches the Megawatt Charging System (MCS)
>who is going to read a book about 19th century finance

What recommendations do you have?
> I realize I waste a lot of time in supermarkets, shops or online stores, browsing/walking around and comparing prices just to penny pinch on low value things, when the savings I would make would have no meaningful impact on my yearly net worth, but the time and mental energy wasted browsing/walking around comparing prices could have better return on investment if used on other things like learning a new skill, reading a book, etc.

That's a feeling I know well. It's even more irrational when it's a habit inherited from parents who weren't particularly poor, so you grow up living in quite a nice house that a lot of time and money has been spent extending, but a 50p ice cream is considered decadent. And after you've made a whole bunch of career choices not optimising for income, saved loads without investing it well, you still find yourself avoiding buying icecreams or coffees when out unless you've got company and comparing cheese prices per kg in a cheap supermarket, not because it's necessary or because you aren't aware that negotiating the price of your next house will save you more than three lifetimes of cheese price comparisons, but simply because doing anything else feels like being ripped off.
But the Hinge data only shows, a fairly obvious in hindsight, observation. That if we live in a society where men are expected to ask women out, the only men women will ask out are those they really wan't to get.

In other words, if you checked for example superlikes which are capped for men, or Roses on hinge, I am sure the same lopsided percentage shows up.
A 787-9 seats "just" 300 because typically 30 seats are 'premium business' where your seat becomes a bed and you have a partition - basically first class but less service and a bit less cushy. 30 are business. 30 are premium cattle class. 200 are cattle class.

https://thepointsguy.com/guide/tour-aa-boeing-787-9-dreamlin...
What does a user see? How should a user investigate a transaction to check what it does? Is there any good automated explanation/visualization of the effect of a transaction?
Is this similar to .NET AppDomain?
> Oh no. Anyway.

Languages encourage the behavior they make easy, and discourage the behavior they make difficult. Rust discourages making lambda captures explicit, because you need to pollute the outer scope or define a nested scope, and even with a nested scope, you can still access variables you didn't pseudo-capture in the nested scope (meaning you can't enforce explicit captures). Additionally I do not appreciate your flippant trolling and dismissal of my arguments.

> If it would, then you already do not need it, because you can use the precise capture pattern (a block expression around a `move` closure) in order to create your clone and the clone macro is just a convenience.

gtk-rs requires shared mutability. Rust discourages shared mutability. I find that pre-cloning shared pointers for every GUI method I want to bind sufficiently painful (as opposed to lacking an unneeded convenience) I would avoid using gtk-rs if not for the clone! macro (and even with it, subclassing was confusing enough and GTK4 so buggy on X11 that I quit anyway).

> That's literally just a repetition of your previous sentence.

No, my previous sentence (was intended to) describe capturing portions of structs (usually by value or trivial copy, always without mutating the original data), whereas this one describes invoking copy constructors of refcounted pointers within the capture block (mutating data visible by the original pointer).
Well said, babypuncher.
Have you ever picked strawberries professionally? My understanding is that it's physically demanding and exhausting. Why not have automated fields providing cheaper produce?
I dont know why you think the whole thing is just because of some social stigma. Nothing in my rebuttal cares about what society thinks. There are 10000 other things that are legit issues with having kids young before I get to "but what would my neighbor think".

> When I was in high school what did I have to do with my time? Not much. Time that could have been put into the child

Where are you getting all this magical time and money to be a responsible parent as a completely naive/inexperienced teenager? It presumes and absolutely requires someone else being able to take up the slack and provide for you as the parent because you are completely incapable of doing it without the help. I'm all for supporting parents who need the help, but I'm nowhere near suggesting "actually its best to have kids when you arent capable of raising them yourself". Not to mention the weird generational gap that then creates where your child now has their own child but is looking to you for guidance on how to raise them but you relied on grandma/grandpa for a lot of that maturity when you had them.

Also this is without considering the strain kids add to a relationship that somehow we think is magically going to be fine for a 16/17 year old.
I'd really suggest going by one of the vote based rankers - since they tend to reflect more active communities much better. So... http://www.topmudsites.com/forums/mudlist.html
Jeffrey Gundlach says he wouldn’t be surprised if Bitcoin drops to $10k
If the patch gap is small, yes. But are you patching V8? Node generally isn't.
Stay away from ESRI (ess-ray) - I should get that printed on a t-shirt.

ESRI centralise power, lock you into their technology, and IMHO a digital twin should be doing the opposite. Don't believe the sales BS about ESRI having "free" software, read the fine print, ArcGIS AINT FREE.

IMHO a Digital Twin should be something for the people, by the people! So please stop paying proprietary systems like ESRI and incentivising them to stifle innovation and increases barriers to entry.

If you want to see local jobs, growth and innovation then invest in OpenSource software like OSM (Open Street Map) and QGIS and other Open GIS products.
One or two hits _in the same spot_.

The bigger threat is dual charged ammunition like the javelins
> worst outcome is I make no money; the best is that I keep 70% of my shares without paying for them. They even pay AMT

I don’t have the details to be able to say anything useful. But there might be a narrow window of tax circumstances in which 70% of the equity without AMT but with loan costs is better than 100% with AMT + marginal long-term taxes and no loan costs. (Such schemes make sense if you’re concerned about not being able to exercise your options on short notice after getting laid off. If you have the liquidity, however, set it aside, take the yield and hold form after talking to a CPA.)
Right? It's a good thing our monetary system and financial instruments aren't complex, phew!
A 787-9 can seat 400 in single-class configuration. It has more than twice the maximum take off weight of the A321XLR. It's a significantly larger plane.

(the A350 is even larger)
This really seems like a variant of "there is a huge labor shortage of highly qualified candidates willing to work for low pay in an awful environment with poor advancement opportunities."
Nice, I didn't know about that. Maybe they can also use it for this pr0n thing?
the wallet in question is probably metamask, a browser extension. it injects a web3 provider in `window.ethereum`.
connecting the wallet is done by calling `window.ethereum.enable()`, this pops up a dialog asking you to connect an address to the website. it just tels the extension that the website is allowed to interact with the extension

This article is about phishing in the context of cryptos.

Silent signing doesn't happen (unless there is some kind of bug in metamask). the user is always presented with the contract address and call data (the args to the contract call)
Inside the dissolution of Apple’s legacy design team
Wealth creators already do pay for society. Where do you think most of the tax money comes from? The top 1% of taxpayers pay almost half the taxes.
Ill have to check out Cal's implementation because thats relatively close to what Im doing now.

I have a WORKSPACE folder I dump multiple .txt files into and then go through them later to organize. Ill post a path in the .txt if its related to a specific file or just a shortcut to the file instead of a .txt

It's kind of like a to-do, but I also have a todo list for more traditional checklist items that I am pretty good about checking.

>Data portability.

anything without this is a non-starter for me personally. I need to be able to import and export with the tools I use. the only exception I make for that is my todo list, because well I dont really care about the history. everything i put in it is meant to be deleted after i do the thing
There is also an issue of compatibility.

Underneath the hood other serverless technologies like lambda are running lightweight VMs running linux. Therefore they can easily accept any linux compatible container and they can run it for you in a serverless way.

Cloudflare Workers are running modified Node.js runtimes. You can only run code that is compatible with their modified Node.js runtime. For Cloudflare to be able to offer a product that runs arbitrary linux compatible containers they would have to change their tech stack to start using lightweight VMs.

If you want to run Node.js, then Cloudflare Workers probably works fine. But if you want to run something else (that doesn't have a good WASM compatibility story) then Cloudflare Workers won't work for you.
Sorry, but this comment is so vauge and always correct in general (there will never be society agree upon truth). What's your point?
I don't think its onerous safety regulations that limit affordable housing. Its a well documented phenomenon that housing policy is driven to protect past buyers over future ones (NIMBY, using zoning laws to limit density of housing, minimal acreage in cities etc).

A combination of loosening up zoning laws around residential buildings and a land value tax would do lots to facilitate affordable housing, but nobody wants to disrupt current homeowners on behalf of renters and future buyers
how many request a month
For radio: https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-news-from-elsewhere-37908828

For schools, businesses and public services: https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20210401-new-law-stoke...
Now one more danger of flying in space: accidentally flying into a black hole
A random act of cold and calculated malice, or the burglars know the homeowner and wanted to destroy as much property as possible.
In 2012? Maybe
This is assuming there wouldn't be a swarm of drones deployed alongside the tanks. Tanks could be used analogously to aircraft carriers, which would be sitting ducks vs jets/subs/battleships, if it weren't for their own jets they're carrying, or the battleships sailing with them.
I've provided some media reports in another comment. Evidence for everything I've said is also very available on Google.
You can read the book in half the running time of the movies. There's a lot of padding and pointless meandering in them. It should never have been a trilogy.
Fair point, Go in particular is a bad example on my part. I'm only suggesting that just because some existing codebase is in a different language doesn't mean that running on WASM is never going to be practical. Yeah not as good as native, but if it means you can target V8 as a VM instead of x86 then it still might win out.
Yeah, that's an issue too, though frankly speaking, partitioned ammo rack and blow out panels be danged, I don't think I'd want to be inside an Abrams that got hit by a Javelin or equivalent.
Old standards suck. VST is owned by Steinberg, and has caused all sorts of trouble in the quest for the "perfect" plugin format. Apple had a couple different solutions to this, but all of them were obviously proprietary to their ecosystem (and only a sidegrade to being shacked to Steinberg). It would be nice to see "one standard to rule them all" for Windows, MacOS and Linux, and u-he has enough weight behind their name to influence a change.

There's a lot of hope behind this, and unless Apple decides to open-source their plugin format, there's nobody to compete. VSTs are so bad that most DAWs would adopt an alternative with zero additional features, simply because Steinberg's positioning is a pain for the community. I reckon this little format has a chance, but it remains to be seen whether it's successful or not.
AWS supports IPv6 on non-default VPCs: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/vpc/latest/userguide/get-started...

I have a hobby project on AWS using it today, with multiple EC2 instances having IPv6 addresses. It works beautifully.
Sad to see this listed as "the last Zachtronics game". They have consistently put out some of the best puzzle games, but I suppose it's good to quit while you're on top.
A couple of comments here talking about how this is piracy, none discussing the fact that paywalls are a completely broken business model in an era where sharing information with your friends/online communities is so important.

Back in the day, with physical paper, if you wanted to discuss an article with someone you'd simply hand them the paper and point. Now, people simply don't share paywalled articles, or if they do someone will comment an archived link immediately.

As Gabe Newell once said, "piracy is almost always a service problem". If the media companies started delivering the product in a way that people actually want the problem of piracy would disappear overnight.

Just shooting the shit, but $x a month to read the paper, with a button to generate un-paywalled links to share with friends and family, and $y a month for a "thought leader" version that lets you generate un-paywalled links with unlimited circulation would let people consume and share news the way they actually want to while still being monetisable.

Trying to charge everyone who looks at your article in an era where success is defined by virality is just dumb.