skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I believe the "man-o-sphere" logic in regards to woman giving misleading information is something along the lines of:

Women want the genuine article with qualities of X, Y, Z.

They do not want a guy who doesn't have those qualities innately. Naturally, upon receiving the information that these qualities are sought after, guys will try to best of their ability to fake them. The fact that a guy has to be told what to do in the first place is very unappealing in itself.

Shortly -it is against their best interests to be open and honest about what they desire.

Because 1) you will get a lot of fakes and 2) it can be dangerous as it can upset some undesirable guys

Consequently the way to understand woman - if we are following along with this logic - is by observing how they act and react and not by listening and believing to what say necessarily.

Or to rephrase - they want you to be a MAN and act like a MAN, and not to be told to be a man and act like a man.

If you have to be told to be more like a man, you're not it obviously.

On top of it, these desires contain certain "manly physical and appearance" qualities that can't really be faked either way.
New Canadian federal bill would compel key industries to bolster cyber security
Nit : From what I remember and most unintuitively Reason is the language/alternative Ocaml syntax and ReasonML is its umbrella project.
it's reviled because nobody wants to learn yet another deployment tool. apt has been reliable enough for installing packages and good enough UX that people can't be bothered
I'm not sure what a range of 4700 Joules mean either!
I don't know OP nor do I know their intent with their comment but taking it at face value the idea that men's value will gradually increase so long as they are successful and by inference women's value will either stagnate or decline and eventually women will have no choice but to give a man his chance is at best man-o-sphere adjacent ideology. Perhaps it's just a mixing of words and that was not the intent of the OP.

I don't think we're talking about the same concept though. You're touching on preferences and in general attraction which is just a normal part of being and doesn't represent some kind of value system where you have high-value and low-value people.
Were trickle down economic principles followed by American politicians to benefit rural Indians?

I don’t think finding a silver lining in the end results of a process counts as it succeeding.
> It’s just not practical to allow 3,000 people to customize their pronouns

> That same day, he invited employees to join him in a Slack channel called “debate-pronouns” where he suggested that people use pronouns based not on their gender identity but their sex at birth

Seriously? Why does the CEO care so much about gender in the workplace? People should be able to come to work and get their job done while not worrying about others mis-gendering them or trying to "scientifically prove" that gender identity isn't a thing. It's a pronoun... it takes zero-effort to address someone the correct way.
Imagine a person is born blind, and from birth is kept in a room and never allowed outside. They are provided with food and a bed, along with a library of audiobooks to listen to whenever they want. From those audiobooks, they learn all about the world around them: about trees, and grass, and wind, and water, and buildings, and birthdays (they've never celebrated), and fireworks, and puppies, etc. Would you say that, because this person has never experienced these things other than via language, they don't -- and can't possibly -- understand anything about the world? I would argue they certainly do understand, and an LLM is doing the same thing.

In a less extreme, hopefully more relatable, example: think back to when you were in school. Everything you ever read in a textbook or on a whiteboard/blackboard or in a homework packet. Are you telling me that either (a) you didn't learn any of it, or (b) you personally experienced everything you read about in order to learn it? Because if there's something you understood by reading about it, despite having no other sensory experience of it, then you learned by finding patterns in the language -- you must have, for it was the only data available to you.

Yes, multi-modal learning has the potential to enhance that learning greatly (hence why multi-modal models are all the rage this year), but humans do in fact learn through language alone sometimes, and we still call that understanding.
I can see wanting to keep my job secret from my peers, but not from my employer. How can you build trust with whomever you're working with? I can't imagine feeling comfortable sending anything in writing in a work environment to a colleague who has no reputational accountability (both within / outside the firm).
What's your position regarding proof-of-stake cryptocurrencies?
Is that not for desktops? What is the alternative for servers?
Airlines have been doing this with 757s for quite some time. This is the best spiritual successor to the 757, which is going to have to be retired in a lot of fleets sooner rather than later.

The layout makes much more of a difference than the number of aisles - I am fine with a 757 but have hated my economy experience in a 9-abreast 787.
No need for the strawman.

Literally just omit the word "other" and the point stands. Without data we don't know numbers for Tesla or other manufacturers. That's literally what data means - the quantitative and possibly qualitative information about the topic.
This is exactly what happened to me as well. I did keto for ~8 months, lost a bunch of weight, and learned that 99% of what's in an american grocery store has a ton of added sugar. Even milk!
Back when I took the author's course on computer graphics in Utrecht (took me a few times to pass it, by no fault of his) I thought it was very strange that the course started out with ray tracing rather than traditional GPU rendering. After all, when you think graphics, you think OpenGL/Vulkan/DirectX, right?

Only after having to implement both types of renderer do you really get an appreciation of how elegant ray tracing really is in comparison. The basic ray tracer from this tutorial clocks in less than 200 lines of C++ excluding the headers! Then there are optimisations like BVHs/BLAS/TLAS which are all so simple to think and reason about compared to the inner workings of a GPU rendering pipeline.

I should find the time to go through this guide again and find out how I can get more performance out of my old ray tracer now that I've grown a few years older and wiser.

This tutorial is more about optimizing a ray tracer than writing one from scratch. If you're looking to learn the basics, I recommend reading through the tutorial the same author wrote eighteen years ago [1]. It covers the more basic concepts of a ray tracer without telling you exactly what to copy paste unless you "cheat" and download the code archive, which is a great way of teaching concepts to programmers in my opinion, as it gives you the opportunity to think for yourself.

With modern C++ you'd probably want to write your code a bit different (VC++ 6 wasn't the best C++ even at its time) and the compute limitations at the time are dwarfed by even your average integrated GPU, but the core concepts haven't changed.

[1]: https://www.flipcode.com/archives/Raytracing_Topics_Techniqu... (I needed to fix the encoding for the page in Firefox to get the math to show up right)
Nothing. Maybe buy a lotto ticket every few months if you have a couple spare dollars floating around?

I’m simply trying to say that that the upside of lotto tickets are way higher than many other activities. It’s almost certainly a bad “investment” strategy. But if you only have $2 then you’re not going to improve your life in the stock market under any conditions but with “luck” a lotto ticket can improve your life.
Yes, that's correct, sorry.
The rate was like 10% when they started raising in the 80s. The situation now is different, and the 'crisis' at hand is the current economy's addiction to rates of zero for so long. Entirely self-inflicted by the FED.
Thank you for linking to all of the data. Consumers have different priorities than society when it comes to these systems, "convenience" vs "safety" respectively.

If these systems are not improving safety above baseline (rate of accidents for non-assisted driving) it would be interesting to find out how this difference appears with each system's level of assistance. Then within those levels, are there certain platforms which pull the numbers in different directions (e.g is a Tesla more or less safe than other DAS of the same level).

If these systems are not resulting in a reduction of accidents, should we rethink what kind of 'driver assistance' should systems provide?
If higher level systems are less safe, should the industry hold off on pushing those systems to market until they're developed further?
If a specific platform is a significant source for the reported accidents, then what action should be taken to address? (disable those specific DAS already in market?)
An angry fish is all you need :)
A beach is obviously a different sort of use than housing, and you don't need a beach to sit on. You do need shelter, though, and in a lot of areas (which are far from any beach), you'll die without shelter.

But if you insist, this is more like folks wanting to make sure there is enough beach for everyone and that everyone can use it - so they make limits on the portions of beach that people can own.
I agree with you. I don't know why but the most disfunctional labs I know about are all in the US (Prof putting meetings on sat morning so everyone comes in to work on weekends...), although I know of some pretty bad places in Switzerland as well. You're also correct postdoc salaries higher in Europe (and developer ones are lower). However, there is definitely a problem finding postdocs also here. I should say that this seems to be not just academia, all my industry colleagues are desperate for applicants.
Fair enough, I've never heard rate increases discussed in relative terms. The context matters in the case.
> when most people and businesses are recovering from historic losses

That's the thing. Most people and businesses did not have historic losses, outside of a few market segments. People and businesses are flush with cash, pumping up demand/inflation.
I was a kid during both oil shocks of the 1970s. That has absolutely nothing to do with my driving. What does, and not just for driving, is the family taught cultural value of 'don't be wasteful'.

So unlike so many people today, I don't make 12 trips a day to stores/friends/whatever when I can just make one or two if I actually think 5 minutes ahead. That applies whether gas is $1 or $5 per gallon.

I also try to make good use of what I own and not discard things that are functional simply to get the new shiny.
NYT published an article as well: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/15/technology/kraken-crypto-...
takes guts to do this and it was needed. Problem is that it will expose that most of the US economy is a sham that needed 0% interest rates to even fake growth. our "leaders" have been kicking the can down the road for a long time. US economy used to grow even with very high interest rates, now even a slight increase puts us into a recession.
But you can't ask billionaires to pay more!
I am sure Microsoft wouldn't have held it against you to drop support for IE back in 2010. It's always been about the customer.
> to the sex you're attracted

Yes, it's not what I typed but this is what I meant. I think from there it's just the normal process of getting to know people. Much better than seeing it as a transaction and a push/pull of low-value and high-value system.
Yeah, it sounds like a Goodhart's Law exploit: if public confidence is based on hiring/layoffs, make it look like you're hiring. Especially when your business is based on an intangible "asset" whose only value is public confidence.
Say whatever you want about his positions… but it isn’t cool to throw people in your company under the bus in front of the public. That right there is enough reason to judge him.
I sincerely believe that HVDC is a game changer here, it allows you to move energy around at a fraction of the losses that were considered normal before allowing for overcapacity in one place to be used elsewhere eliminating a major requirement for storage, on that scale there is no lack of combined sun/wind availability.
The years leading up to Covid were an extreme bull market — increasing at a rate that high again is not a return to “normal”, it’s a return to a historically very high growth rate
If fuel economy is your goal, you can take a glider.

A skilled glider pilot can go (slowly) as far as they like with no fuel. The typical limit is when you get tired and need to sleep (gliding can't yet be done well by a computer, because it takes quite some skill to find the necessary thermals and wind currents).
Have Israeli tanks ever faced Javelins tho?
Yes. Everyone else can use context.
At the end of the day any rigid diet the restricts processed sugars is excellent. Keto indirectly ends up addressing this, and the rigidity of it makes it particularly effective.

I find that keto excludes a huge portion of the population that is not willing to give up complex carbs in some capacity. As long as they drop outright sugars and grains, a person should still be able to get the advantage of keto while being on a more follow-able keto-lite.
Can’t do anything about it except wait for her to age out. Progress occurs one funeral at a time and all that jazz.
It's cheaper (no need to buy supplies) so you can do things you'd never be able to afford IRL. Which also allows you to experiment with more things. This also lessens the consequences of failure.

You can do the activity when there's free time (like at night) with no real planning.

You can put the task down for months on end without negative results because time is constrained to the game world. Or put another way, constant upkeep tasks and their results can be perfectly saved.

Game worlds can be tightly controlled if you wish it. Reality is uncontrollable.
This is an excellent question that's asked every five to ten years since 1916 and so far always ends up answered "yes".
The one difference, to my mind, is this:

> Relationships start off as acquaintances and develop organically as we spend time together.

I would say that I have dated a lot in the past 10 years, and have been in some great long term (1 year or longer) relationships, but I've never dated someone I've met through my social circles, nor have I ever started off as an acquaintance and then transitioned over time into being romantically involved. I've always seen someone I was physically attracted to (at the airport, coffee shop, etc), strike up a conversation, and if their personality is as attractive as their appearance then I pursue that person romantically.

I don't even know how going from acquaintance to romantic partner would work. If someone isn't attractive to me at the start, they're not going to become attractive later (unless they can, what, become someone who they were not?). If they are attractive to me, then I don't see why I would want to artificially delay pursuit of something that could be great for both of us.

If that's not dating, I don't know what it's called.
I currently work in embedded software which involves a lot of overlapping interaction with EE and hardware design folks. The consensus is that the hardest, most fascinating field is the one you currently have the least exposure to. The easiest, least exciting field is the one you have a degree in.

In CS, you may have spent thousands or tens of thousands of hours across many years learning and growing, and still being limited in your understanding of the field as a whole. It's daunting to explore other related fields just to find out that they each have similar levels of complexity, filled with professionals who've sunk similar levels of effort, time, and years of their life into their work (who are often equally struck by the complexity of your field.)
Type A + career oriented is uncommon for wanting kids. One of those has to give in that dynamic. I've known plenty of women who are both but they're uncommon and while they love their kids - when they think abstractly... They didn't really like kids except for the part where they're not missing out on something.

Procrastinators aren't really a thing - IMO. I think people who have too high of standards are the main issue. They try to get someone who isn't going to ever settle down with them and constantly chase that. By the time they realize they cannot get that person and will constantly get non-committal relationships with them - they are past their prime and will slowly settle (or just get a dog and be alone while having sex with random people to boost self-esteem here and there).

So, character traits I'd say that lead to being single at that age as a lady are ones where someone has an inflated ego, doesn't work on themselves, and/or is generally expecting more than what they offer. That's what I've noticed a lot. (I know a lot of women - most of my friends are women)
What percentage of Linux desktop users install Ubuntu and call it a day?
75 BPS is 0.75% of the total or "100%", not of the current value. BPS makes it more clear that the increase each time is linear, so another 75 BPS will be the same absolute percentage as this 75 BPS.
The ones in storage are like t-62s so no chips required =)
Have you read the culture document? Do you agree with it? Has anyone you manage chosen to leave because of it?
>Every single of the thousands of innovation that goes into an iPhone was subsidized by rich venture capitalists and rich early adopters

Don't forget the governments which helped fund the basic research used to make such things, the middle and lower classes that pay more in property taxes so companies can be bribed to build factories, and other such things.

Put another way it's a much more complicated picture than just those two.
Turns out I am. Which explains so much ...

To be honest, I'd forgotten about the 418 status code and HTCPCP. Good to see someone is trying to keep it alive!
Nah. This is always what happens. It's the inverse the old saw "buy on rumor sell on news".
I took a quick look at your landing page, and I've got to say it doesn't do that great a job of telling me what it is or how it works.

Are you able to provide a short summary, and maybe compare it to Ubuntu Core and BalenaOS?

Would it be suitable for shipping appliances? How do you folks make money?

Thanks :)
they're not real submarines they're just boats really
> If one writes Go or Rust, there are much better ways to run them than targeting WASM

Is there a similar priced way to run Go or Rust with similarly fast cold starts and low latency?

I think this is the real selling point of isolates; inefficient if you want to run a postgres server but perfect for low latency edge stuff.

There is the usual argument that on premise/dedicated servers scales way better that people expect, nonetheless the trend seems to be a move towards smart CDNs...
Just make sure you supplement potassium since that tends to be lost with the water.
There's also drones to consider.
One summer I got stuck in the back woods of Alberta with nothing to read but a plastic grocery bag filled with James Patterson novels. I read everything in that bag and not for one second did I believe one word of anything that he had written. Gawd, what an awful experience. I'll never read another book by that lame ass hack again.
I know simple metaphors for complex problems aren’t great, but I’ve always liked this one:

Think of an economics equilibrium as a guitar string. The harder you pluck it (shock) the longer if vibrates back and forth before reaching equilibrium. Plucking it softer but more often, keeps the string closer to equilibrium across the entire time horizon.

This also applies to things like minimum wage increases.
There's a workaround for this on the Arch Wiki:

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Fprint#Login_configuration

This also helps if you want to use the touch / Yubikey / Whatever to unlock the machine, but you need to type in the password when opening the session so that all the wallets unlock, too.
> For the purposes of anything official, you are unemployed. You would not get any retirement options. Your earnings would not be reported to the IRS.

That's called "job fraud," and it's a crime in most countries.
Rather purchase an EUV machine for that price.
There is a slight difference though. In the pronoun case the asker is implicitly demanding that norms change on their behalf. The changing (or fighting the change) of those norms is an explicitly political act.

Similarly, my wife not taking my name upon our marriage was an implicit political act and my mom going by Ms. was as well.

At different points in time either of those acts could have brought ridicule to my wife and mother so that’s not a terribly good standard.

Personally, I view addressing people as they want to be simply polite but let’s not pretend that our view of “correct” isn’t a political act that is potentially outside the current norms.
That's literally what GP said: NDAs are only enforceable if you make more than $100k/year (the threshold), and that a lot of MS employees make more than $100k.
The best science is found by accident.
I've been strict keto for over five years and intend to continue for life due to the weight loss, health, emotional and cognitive benefits I experience. A little while back I did a casual experiment where I intentionally increased caloric intake while remaining strict keto. I did ultimately start to gain weight, of course (because ---> physics).

What was impressive though was how long it took and how slow the gain progressed. Because keto calories tend to be so satiating, it almost felt like I had to work at getting my energy balance to stay meaningfully positive. When I'm full on natural fats, it's hard to keep eating. The other interesting thing was, even though I gained some weight, I maintained most of the non-weight related benefits (cognitive, emotional balance). My guess is this may be due to keto calories being almost all fresh, unprocessed foods.
I'm actually in the process of moving a large monolith from EC2 to Heroku and this is exactly what the plan is: our DB (> 10TB) is on RDS; ES, Redis also are from AWS. Third-party services aren't provisioned through the marketplace, instead straight through the vendor. Right now this is Datadog and a bug reporter.

We're extremely overprovisioned on EC2 as it is (peaking at 54GB consumed RAM over the last 12 months, and we have 386GB available) so management is welcoming the change to a bunch of Performance L dynos!

We're moving to Heroku for a variety of reasons — least of which is their recent fiasco — primarily dev exp and Pipelines/review apps (still supported!). Both will give our developers a vastly superior experience to what they had: nothing (we desperately need it).
The truth is they never were. I think i heard somewhere that avg battlefield lifetime of a tank in ww2 was less than 20 minutes
It could have been worse, that's the point. It is also unknown exactly how much of a total raise is needed, hence the iterative approach to ensure no over-correction. The world economy has many moving parts, you can't panic when trying to manipulate it.
Well, yes, but this doesn't drive on a road at 130km/h, it files through the sky at close to speed of sound
> it's not far from their territories

I think your sense of geography may be off a bit.
But this is an online program.
The grass is always greener on the other side