skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
So that first page doesn't actually have the shortcut, it has a link to another page that contains the shortcut.

Secondly, it doesn't have the details on capturing without a shadow in an easy to read format.
But, you shouldn't have to be. And more importantly, what happens when he brings this attitude to long term space missions or other endeavors where human lives are at risk? Just because he's doing something you like doesn't mean it's okay, or good, or right.
(Nigeria)
Well, the issue is, they made a company data protection issue criminal and not civil. It would be moving to a country where data protection is a civil matter in a day and age where data leaks happen on a regular basis.
Anyone have recommendations for which probiotics are the best ones to buy?

I always get confused while looking at all the various options, and this seems like a good place to find someone who’s done a lot of research.
Are enough people lining up? I had an Amazon recruiter reach out to me on LinkedIn. I figured they would get enough applicants where that wasn’t needed, so ignored it as some kind of scam. A couple months later a co-worker of mine put in his notice to leave for Amazon. He told me he got the same kind of message on LinkedIn, but actually replied.
I can imagine that play/pause/step buttons could help a lot (for all of the animations), so each reader could "slow it down" manually and take all the time they need.

PS: Great work, thank you! :)
I was going to make an NFT joke but these illustrations are so cool they don't belong in the same breath.
I didn't see anyone complaining about games in the parent comments.
> it's not that Humans (Ax) came from ape (Ay) but rather they evolved out from some common ancestor (that may or may not still exists today)

She knows this already, I did show here pictures of Australopithecus(ape) and Homo Habilis (human). She knows that the mother of the first human was something like an Australopithecus, while the first human was something like Home Habilis.

The problem is a logical one. Granted that one Homo Habilis was born from one Australopithecus, who would she mate with to have offspring? Would she commit bestiality with some Australopithecus of her tribe, or did in fact TWO such homo habilis suddenly appear in that tribe in the same generation? (And become Adam and Eve, or something.) The latter would, by common sense, seem to be extremely unlikely.

I know the real science behind it. Clearly, the problem is to think about a species as a category that is invariant across time. The real answer is that "The category 'human' is not well defined over evolutionary time, so your question is absurd."

That is good answer to a 15-year-old. But I was struggling to come up with a good explanation that would extend my methaphor in a way a 5-year-old might understand.
From the same reference provided above...

"Later the woman said, that Assange's action has not been a crime for her and that she has "long forgiven" Assange."

And also from [2] below:

"...one of the two women, who was simply accompanied by the other, was horrified when the police before her eyes began to draw up a rape report from her statements. She, as she pointed out on several occasions, had sexual relations with Assange on a totally consensual basis, and only contacted the authorities to find out whether it would be possible to force him to take an AIDS test. As soon as she realized that the police were starting to do something completely different, she interrupted the interrogation in a state of shock and left the room. However, only a few hours later, the headline appeared in large letters in the Swedish tabloid press: Julian Assange was accused of double rape..."

[2] "How Swedish authorities invented the rape charge against Julian Assange":
https://www.pressenza.com/2020/03/how-swedish-authorities-in...

Remember this went on for 9 years...now what is surprising is why nobody is trying to make the Swedish prosecutor office accountable for it's actions?
RDP is not remotely (no pun intended) the same thing. It solves an entirely different class of problem.
$700k is a nice house in most US cities. The median price is around $400k.
From the image, I get strong “Microsoft Intellimouse Explorer” vibes.
Data on internet search interest is fairly widely used by investors, both professional and retail, but the existing publicly available tools aren’t typically built with investors in mind.

Google Trends is great for seeing whether interest is trending up or down for a particular company, but it doesn’t allow you to easily see the companies with the largest increases and decreases in search interest. That was the primary value I was looking to add, while also allowing users to search by ticker to get interest graphs as you’d find on Google Trends.
It's like the republicans on abortion, the last thing they want is to actually pass any legislation, because then they'll have lost an issue that they can use to rile up the dumbest side of their supporters, combining the best of "won't someone think of the children", and "omg, genitalia in motion is much more evil than violence", and "if we do this right, we'll have a perfect panopticon to catch out the others out there that you don't like".
Using AOL 3.0 in 2022
Eh, we vote in the top people but government's are mostly run hierarchal just as companies are and shareholders vote in board members who appoint the ceo who then runs the company hierarchal so I honestly don't see that much difference.
At will employment. You can be fired anytime for any reason, and there's not much in the way of recourse. Though you also get to quit without notice at such a job.
I said what I said

People tried to get corporations to “use their platform”, some started doing that at the annoyance and exclusion of employees that werent interested in having those unrelated causes and discussions in the workday while being told “silence means you’re against us and for whatever we’re against today”

The corporation does not exist for that and is a conduit for revenue exclusively

Some other type of organization is more suited for that, they exist. It may be incompatible with someone’s ability to exchange time for food and shelter but thats exclusively their problem

So its nice to see more examples of complete and immediate excision, a reversion to the mean
Sure, why care about splitting algorithms into functions and naming them appropriately when you can just write it all in a 3k line function.
It's a pretty persistent "myth" ... do you have any support that it's a myth other than "I've been in SEO for a while"?
Indeed it might not be enough, and there is no one size that fits them all ;) For inference times of 50ms I wouldn't bother complicating the setup that much. Again, it all depends on your requirement and trade offs available.
> It's not like people have had a choice.

Buying vs renting is a choice
You missed the point.

They said Trump was their "ideal" of a rich and successful person.

Not that he wasn't rich or successful.
If you want balance of power improve your skills and get job in a company that values you more. There would never be perfect balance of power. It's not real life.
Here’s hoping TSLA shares drop from 6-700 to 200 just because Musk is an ahole
They critized Musk, factually. Musk is not their employer, SpaceX is, but you just proved their point since you believe Musk and SpaceX are one and the same.
You’re missing his point. He’s making an appeal to see someone trained to help someone having a mental health related issue. This would be in opposition to simply talking to friends and family or balling it up inside.

Your comments about income inequality are valid but the OP stated he has sufficient income that he should be able to find help. My benefits package pays for a dozen therapy sessions and the rest are $25 each. Ironically my company doesn’t provide dental insurance. Apparently being an affluent tech worker means you don’t need to have working teeth ;).
I don't understand why "4. Stay at your company and try to change culture within by organizing collectively, either through the guise of a union or informally" isn't also something you are free to do, besides that you think doing so is not "do[ing] something positive to the society", but is instead "becoming a bunch of cry babies."

Also why is 3 binary? If I am a minority investor in a company, I am not free to criticize the management? I have to buy the majority of the company and fire the management?

It kind of seems like you don't actually understand that soft power exists. The canonical book on this within organizational politics is "Exit, Voice and Loyalty". Have you ever had a social interaction in your entire life? Not everything is an ultimatum, some things are conversations.
Wow, they must hide that well, I've been using them for years and never seen that. Time to go digging.
So if nothing is changing, why is it changing from a data leak being a criminal offence for an indivual from being a civil offence for the company? That seems like a massive change! Seems like the laws are changing!

Just to be clear, some poor sod is going to end up getting a criminal conviction because someone at the company they work for but don't own fucked up. You get a so-so paid job at a mega corp and end up with a criminal record because some guy in an office you've never been to did something. That is nuts.
> I'm not sure what the solution is but I feel like there's got to be a better way.

Universal healthcare? Like any other Western country?
Why Bitcoin Is Valuable
Popups were never required in the first place, what was required was to get consent before tracking users.

Websites that seem they need to track users immediately and across their entire web space implemented popups because it's the only way to get consent before showing content, but that's the website's choice, not a consequence of the law.
>Are the people working at SpaceX and Tesla "Silicon Valley tech workers"? I think most of them aren't.

I think they are.

"Silicon Valley" is an idea or abstraction now, rather than a geographic location.
I hate having to press Shift to get braces. Let's use square brackets which require no modifier key.
The popups happen because that turns out to be what the legislation is incentivising. The solution is to make different legislation that doesn't incentivise popups.

Some examples (obviously not problem-free, but just to show that a solution space exists):

* No tracking even with permission

* No tracking unless the user mailed you hard-copy permission

* No popups

* No popups unless user testing shows that a user who hates popups, doesn't care about privacy and is just clicking stuff to get to see the site, will decline tracking at least 80% of the time
Musk talked so much about "free speech" in recent times!

This move is embarrassing.

You can't just fire people for criticism.
You're commenting on a post about an RCT that does show probiotics having an effect...? And AIUI, there's plenty of other evidence of a) their efficacy for changing the gut biome and b) the gut biome's causal effect on a variety of health issues.
Just click the petercooper user link, upthread. It's in the profile.
And now, we see the biggest irony in thinking this was bad

It was not a bailout for banks, it was for their account holders.
Early dementia or Alzheimers?
When they realize the vast majority of people completely reject this view, its holders will turn to ecofascism.
I should have just left out the "Silicon Valley" part of that, true. Unionization of developers and technology workers is starting, but remains slow because unions are usually formed when the cost of speaking out becomes worth more than enduring the negatives and unreasonably low pay is usually one of the biggest issues for workers and we don't really have pay issues. Musk's approach to treating his employees as cogs in his machines, to the point of becoming belligerent when they assert their human individuality, could be an accelerant in forming unions even in this high-pay sector.
Haven’t read Hoffman’s work, so I could be misinterpreting, but if you enjoy thinking about the self as ontological grounding I would recommend reading Kant. He pioneered a lot of the ideas mentioned in your post.
> But a handful of other things unexpectedly improved. Acid reflux went from really bad to barely noticeable

What are you even buying if you don't mind me asking? I don't get acid reflux often, but I definitely want to prevent it happening so often, because it continues for days when I do get it. There's all sorts of things that say they have / are probiotics, including a few different sodas out there.
> Imagine that it is floating over a 1km by 1km (or even 1 mile by 1 mile) area - what are you going to use against it?

an EMP?
Behold the Magnetar, nature’s ultimate superweapon
What makes you think all companies are like that? Get a job in a company where you won't get fired in a well meaning letter.
Because "easy to read and maintain" is about humans, and "speed of C" is about machines, and there is a vast gulf between the 2 that always force you to compromise in one or the other to get the 2 together, and usually both.

Code being easier to read and maintain is a function of how close it is to human semantics. The more the algorithm is presented in terms and notations humans like and find familiar, the easier. Code being performant is a function of how close it is to machine semantics, the more the algorithm is presented as steps that the machine likes and finds familiar, the faster it will run, as the machine is doing less to execute each step.

There is a fundamental tension between the 2, even if compilation from high level languages might, at first glance, give us the illusion that we can have both. We can't, not in general. We can only do it for a class of human semantics that C++ folks call "Zero-Cost Abstractions", the set of abstractions that can be completely erased without a trace by the time you get to the executable.

But otherwise, there is a fundamental cost to making code more readable by humans: making it less readable by the machines that will execute it. This is a reflection of the fundamental alienness of computers, what they find quite easy you find quite hard and vice verca. Optimizing for huamans means generality and ruthless hiding of details, optimizing for machines is all about special cases and ruthless exploitation of assumptions.

(Incidentally, C is not all what it's cracked up to be. Generic containers, off the top of my head, resort to using void* pointers for data and function pointers for operation, which has a runtime cost besides being unsafe and error-prone. Templates in C++ can aggressively inline types and operations for you, on the other hand as if you haven't written generic code at all, no wonder templates is the poster boy for C++'s 0-Cost abstractions. Another example I hear often is how pointer semantics in C and C++ makes it extraordinarily difficult for the compiler to optimize array and memory operations, whereas a language like Fortran make it easier by not having pointers.)
Can't you look for a new job equally well whether you quit on your own or your union boss ordered you not to work?
I enjoy him but my wife finds him cringey. I think I like the podcast because he is somewhat “autistic” sounding but yet sensitive and emotionally thoughtful which seems like a foreign combination for me. Like he is an introvert and somewhat an extrovert in one person. My wife is not “autistic” or an introvert, but is already sensitive and emotionally thoughtful so it’s just cringe to her.
He has Asperger’s and has talked openly about his difficulty understanding social cues.

https://www.axios.com/2022/04/15/elon-musk-aspergers-syndrom...

I don’t think that fully excuses or justified everything he does, but it has some explanatory power.

It’s obvious by his work output that he is not a very typical person, and it seems like society as a whole is gaining tremendous benefit from his eccentricity. I don’t think we have to like him, but speaking for myself, I still respect him and on the whole am grateful for his life’s work. I wish he’d stay away from Twitter… but, oh well.
Does it even make sense trying to "democratize" (read: loosen the standards of) highly-selective schools? Aren't they desirable precisely because they are selective, so their students share classes with similar high-achievers, enabling more challenging learning?

Of course the article opens by delegitimizing any sort of familial intergenerational help and solidarity. If it can't be done in one generation, then it's not worth doing at all, so goes the NY Times' logic.

Edit: My disdain for the NY Times grows. The first clue was how stingy the article was with statistics. From the article:

the goal is not a spot in just any of the 160 schools but admission to eight or nine that are especially competitive, prestigious and largely dominated by white and Asian families

Note the phrase "white and Asian". So, how much "dominating" is each group doing, separately? The article doesn't substantiate its claim, but we can find out. According to [1], NYC is 35.1% non-Hispanic white and 13.9% Asian. Summing the numbers in [2], the presumably top 8 specialized schools in NYC are 28.5% non-Hispanic white and 51% Asian.

So whites are under-represented by a factor of 0.81 (and a minority in both NYC and the schools), and Asians over-represented by a factor of 3.67 (and a majority in the schools). And this the Times calls "dominated by white and Asian" - with "white" in first place even!

I never thought the accusation "Every word she writes is a lie, including 'and' and 'the'." could be accurate, but in this case the "and" between "white and Asian" is literally a lie. I'm honestly impressed.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_New_York_City

[2] https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/18/nyregion/black-students-n... Unpaywalled TOR link to the table: https://www.nytimesn7cgmftshazwhfgzm37qxb44r64ytbb2dj3x62d2l...
If I might be so bold, I don’t think anyone around here really appreciates Musk’s antics very much. However Tesla and SpaceX are fundamentally sound, if overvalued, businesses. Since the start of Tesla he has had loud and obnoxious detractors who have had any number of reasons Tesla is about to implode. Instead they keep churning out solid EVs and SpaceX keeps putting stuff in space. As much as I dislike him, I would not bet against his businesses.
I have never found a nonstick pan that worked well enough for me to call it truly non-stick, and have long since relegated myself to stainless steel, since I can more easily predict the stick-factor, and scour it with steel wool if I need to.
When you get margin called in traditional/centralized finance, humans intervene and liquidation is not immediate (except Interactive Brokers, who are closer to how crypto manages margin, and will liquidate you without a margin call). Maybe you put up more collateral, maybe you borrow from a line of credit, there is a buffer. As an individual, you work with your broker. As a larger participant, you work with the clearinghouse (of meme stock fame).

In crypto, there is no buffer. Auto liquidation of undercollateralized positions occurs. All of those humans in the loop, “unfair rules”, and settlement delays crypto proponents complain about are the very things that make traditional finance stable. This is why traditional finance doesn’t take seriously the idea of immediate settlement, and why end of day settlement is as good as it’ll get.
There's been a rise in autism during the same period, some people chalk that up to increased diagnosis but pollution is a very reasonable hypothesis as well.
It's useful if you're trying to decide which is going to last longer, Harvard, or Bob's Quality Education Mill est. 2022.

It's not useful if you're trying to decide whether Bob's Education Mill will last longer than the state-funded community college opened in the same year, there are plenty of other heuristics which we might use there, but not this one.
It's parents being lazy and demanding that the rest of the community accommodate their needs for bringing up their children, while abdicating any actual effort on their part.

So instead of parents actually installing and/or configuring and/or actually using all of the different parental controls that are already available to stop their kids seeing stuff they shouldn't, they want all the rest of us to deal with the bullshit, while not solving the problem.
Seriously, this is someone who dedicates a large portion of his life to learning very complex things and working hard to learn in public and share his knowledge with other people. I'm hoping we're just seeing the loud minority otherwise we're at the top of the S-curve of progress and proliferation of complex ideas.

The only wet blanket is the baseless negative sentiment people express that puts out the fire of curiosity.
You could try his Patreon.
He's at his lowest point in the eyes of the media (which is how most of us see the world) but hes actually at the highest point in his career and achievements.

Tesla is about to explode in production with their "biggest building in the world factory" in texas, berlin and china.

SpaceX is about to achieve the holy grail of the space industry (an affordable and reusable rocket) not to mention Starlink.
I'm really starting to wonder if 2022 won't be looked back as the year that Elon finally jumped the shark.

A lot of people (myself included) really respect SpaceX and I think that's the last pillar on which Elon's reputation stands. Tesla honestly isn't that interesting and there's a real chance it gets eaten alive as other car manufacturers have caught up. The Cybertruck is still vaporware whereas the F150 Lightning is real and, from what I've seen at least, very highly regarded.

What I think is finally giving people Elon fatigue is his politics. The Twitter acquisition is deeply tied to that. He's just another rich cringe conservative. That's it. Coming out and supporting DeSantis, for example, should surprise literally no one.

He has a very thin skin (remember the whole "pedo guy" incident?), inflates his own accomplishments (eg claiming he founded Tesla) and honestly just comes off (now more than ever) as just an awful human being.

Stories I've heard seem to reflect that SpaceX and Tesla aren't great places to work (at least compared to big tech companies).

I really get the sense that people are increasingly getting sick of hearing from or about him. YMMV.
This brings a whole new meaning to "Wake Me Up When September Ends."
OCaml and Haskell parse `a b c d e f` as `((((a b) c) d) e) f`.
> democracy as long as it's not within his companies.

Can you name a single company that operates as a democracy?
Alternatively we unionize and see that balance of power happen.

It’s funny all this anti union speak and then when companies are faced with it suddenly their purses start opening up.
For local trains you need your loading and unloading time to be as fast as possible anyway. People have places to be, waiting around on your trains and platforms is not on the list of things they want to do. It is even worse when they are waiting around not moving at stations they don't want to get off at. 60 seconds is the absolute longest any train door should be open for, and 45 is reasonable. (it can be pushed to 30 or even 15, but that starts to be impossible for the disabled and so not worth it)
Rails/Django is the quickest route. Especially rails with huge gems ecosystem and dev experience way beyond what python can offer.

React seems like overkill for a simple task like this.
> "The announcement says it wants to "protect consumers", but it changes user tracking from opt-in to opt-out... "

The cookie-blocking features in modern browsers (except Chrome, probably, haha) effectively make tracking opt-in anyway, don't they? The cookie pop-ups are pretty redundant today.

Not to suggest that this makes all the down sides of Brexit worthwhile, but it does make me happy that this can now be addressed. Cookie popups seriously harm the usability of the web and have been one of the most highly visible and ill-conceived pieces of EU legislation.