skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It should be noted that, in the context of a legal proceeding, “expertise” is both broader and narrower than the common usage. “Broader” in the sense that evidentiary law rigidly distinguishes between fact testimony, which for the most part is the testimony of people with personal knowledge of the facts, from expert testimony. As a result, the latter can include things like accounting, summarizing, or analyzing financial numbers to calculate damages.

On the other hand, the Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert v. Merrill Dow imposes the requirement that expertise be based on “reliable” methods. That would arguably exclude a number of academic discipline that aren’t based on such methods.
Alternatively,

http://bytepointer.com/resources/old_new_thing/20040506_174_...
How to Create Your Own Cryptocurrency Using No-Code Tools
The Case for the Vertical Farm
In that case, the prius prime battery alone is probably sufficient for several days. And it's 30K less than the eF150. And you can actually buy one off the lot today. :)
Please...it's off by 1%. Most "high quality" money market funds aren't at 100% funded and no one is freaking out over that.
True, though the cost of hardware isn't really that much, especially if you're ok with buying Behringer. A lot of the costs of studio setups used to be expensive mixers/reel to reel tape machines and that is certainly better done in the laptop nowadays.
> Imagine if mass-storage devices were cheap enough that you could afford 307 gigabytes for a single movie. Your hardware would still have to support a sustained data rate of 1 Mbyte per second to play it back.

I recently bought a $20 flash drive to store the entire contents of a my friend's late-2000s PC with a 250GB hard drive on. Didn't think much of it.

(Yes, I know the article is from 1994.)
Their CLI seems to support showing attachments: https://github.com/lastpass/lastpass-cli/blob/8767b5e53192ad...
I read somewhere that a not so insignificant sum is held by accounts that just hold.
That wasn't a battery issue though, it was a wiring harness issue. That's a relatively common problem even in gas cars. Cars have a lot of wiring.
Is building trust and growing genuine care for someone easy for you?

Trust is always a gamble, at extreme you are putting your life on the line and you never know if the other person will decide to betray you next time regardless of what they did in the past.

Caring about someone is even harder as it is not a conscious choice we are making, it is feeling. You can't just decide from today I care about this person so they are my friend.

My point was, how do you know someone is your friend not how to make one. There is no method to make friends, at best some tips or guidelines.
How does the concept of a table here differ from that of a standard relational table (if at all)? Is it that the table is a logical abstraction over a distributed set of files?
Safe Word was invented for the purpose of stopping the play when faked violence or lack of consent do not go as planned.
I think we do. If something can make decisions, without external input, act on those decisions without external support, then it could be said to be sentient.

Perhaps, I dare say, a key indicator of sentience is the ability to kill another species, even its own, but chooses not to.
> What is the thing that makes it end?

This is much easier to answer, at least in general, than many of the other "bubble" questions out there.

The growth simply requires a larger and larger pool of new investors. It first started with tech enthusiasts who were really interested in the principles of cryptocurrency and people who also knew how they worked. The was a time when everyone in crypto had read the original Bitcoin whitepaper.

Then it spreads to less savvy technical investors, people working at tech companies but not really able to understand it. This was the first bubble a few years back. The crypto boom could have ended here, relatively harmlessly.

But then a ton of money started flowing into the market and into individuals pockets as well. Suddenly the pool of potential "investors" opened up and crypto also appeared to be much more liquid than before with the rapid rise of crypto exchanges. This is when you start seeing TV ads for crypto and hear of people on reddit, with no technical knowledge or skills, pouring all their surplus income into crypto.

It ends when there aren't enough new "investors" to keep the illusion up, and it crashes as people start to need to liquidate that investment. During the artificial pandemic boom there was money flowing everywhere, people could throw tons of money into crypto and still eat and pay their mortgage. Very soon people are going to need to get that money out, or desperately want to, and then liquidity will be a problem because there aren't any people left to feed into the scheme.

The faster the price drops coupled with people needing that money, the more likely a panic is to happen which will cause a sudden crash.
One of the well-known category theorists has said [0],

> I’ve never succeeded in understanding the slightest thing about it.

[0] https://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2010/08/what_is_the_lan...
The first time I watched video stream on the PC through the internet was through RealPlayer G2 on a 33600bps modem. I could never use VDOLive, but I remember it to be well regarded at the time.

Anyone knows a simple FLOSS app that allows me stream a camera directly from my computer? I'd like to try exposing the capture of a webcam through TOR to access it from anywhere without requiring any specialized service.
> It's not the "same trick"

To be clear, I'm referring to "calling attestations audits". Both Tether and USDC are using that same trick.

There are two options; they don't know the difference (incompetent), or they know the difference and still choose to publicly conflate the two (fraudulent). Neither is good.

> Also, "attestations" aren't meaningless. They're not full audits, but they're not meaningless.

They are meaningless for purposes of "does this organization control the money they claim to control".
The 'Vision' Is Distorted from Inside the Tech Bubble (2002)
Yes, then you just need to hope and prey that no one ever leaks any data...
I disagree. If the lawyer is trying to call the process into question rather than addressing the facts, it's important to remind the jury of lawyer's questionable part of the process as well. Fallacious reasoning shouldn't stand in a courtroom.
Assembly Instructions Distribution
You're absolutely right regarding from market highs.

To do this correct you'd need purchases and sales versus assets.

All that said, it's why I put a rough estimate of 30% (instead of 60%) and hadn't included any losses in broader commercial paper (which has dropped). So the overall estimate is defensible.

Also agree on Basel 2-like risk. The primary issue with Tether is the marketing around stability and the transparency. If it was treated like any other "money market" with better NAV reporting, position reporting and rules around withdrawals then we'd mitigate some of the risks.
I throttled it down to Chrome's "slow 3G" setting and it still worked fine. The filters were active as soon as the page displayed, though the images took a lot longer to load after that.

There might be cases where the issue you describe occurs, but I haven't actually seen it in testing. If it's a concern, you could of course add throbbers or the such. But generally, in our limited tests, it hasn't been an issue.

Still, it is an issue they (and the React ecosystem) are actively working on improving, with React Suspense (https://17.reactjs.org/docs/concurrent-mode-suspense.html) and Next.js Layouts (which I understand is copied from Remix(?) and can fetch component groups in a hierarchy https://nextjs.org/blog/layouts-rfc). There is also server components and streaming, which can render HTTP snippets/components (instead of pages) and send those back over the wire, similar to the PHP days: https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/react-18/streaming

But again, the benefit is mostly to the developer experience. It's a lot easier to write everything in React than to have to switch between PHP and Drupal (as in the admin UI) and JS. There are some benefits to the user experience if done well, but the same could be said of a statically cached Drupal output.
If Celsius should go bankrupt and your pension fund is affected it's pretty related.
I think most people would prefer for the sanctions on Russia to be more rigorously enforced
In my case, it was limited to work stuff. I would want to do literally anything except work. Even tech stuff, I could spend any amount of time building a random website that serves no purpose, I just didn't want to look at Jira anymore.

Then I took a sabbatical, traveled, all of that and suddenly I started caring about the product, company, etc. again
I definitely find that when I'm close to burning out, I'm eager to start arguments and throw unnecessary barbs into conversations. It's a more specific example of the general symptom of beginning not to care.
>See: LA

I'm not even sure what this is supposed to mean? Los Angeles? What does Los Angeles have to do with Growth? Or is this some crypto coin?
It was the same thing for football (or soccer, as you call it in the US) over here in Europe, at some time late last year I started to notice that a lot of European clubs were advertising for this crypto thing, much of it related to Binance. It so happens that most of the tokens “released” by those clubs (yes, they also did that) are 90% or more bellow their peak value, there were a few threads about it on /r/soccer recently.
When you think about what happiness is, I think you maybe burning out or is already burned out.
Autonomy is not sentience.
Twitch notifications when streamer you follow comes online.
Many sanctions harm completely innocent people.
> As it is all crypto trading is purely speculation.

The reason I stay invested is the supply-side economics.

The supply is well-known in advance, and is advantageous to Bitcoin. US M2 money supply grew 8.04% in the past year [0], while Bitcoin's grew ~1.75% [1].

Yes, demand has its 80% ups and downs, but each crash was to a level higher than the previous.

[0] - https://ycharts.com/indicators/us_m2_money_supply_yoy

[1] - https://charts.woobull.com/bitcoin-inflation/
Hello person with my same struggle yet different username. I feel you 110% on this one.

There is a completely demoralizing sense that my career has "evaporated" and none of my achievements, accomplishments or jobs have any worth.

It has caused me to become incredibly bitter, resentful and angry at the world. I don't know how to turn the trauma of this mistreatment and abandonment into a happy "this is ok" face for the world.
> What makes Saylor so dangerous to investors is that he is sincere. Though he was cited for fraud by the SEC, Saylor is not a con man. He genuinely believes in his vision, his own version of reality. When another member of his generation of entrepreneurial millionaires joked to Saylor in a social setting that "you cost me a lot of money," the response, Leibovich reports, was something like "not as much as it cost me." Not once in hours of interviews, Leibovich says, did Saylor express remorse about how much the collapse of MicroStrategy stock cost investors who bought the shares because they bought into Saylor's "vision."

2022 has echoes of 2002.
I agree with this criticism. But it seems more like a practical obstacle than a fundamental one, which is important to distinguish. A practical obstacle can be overcome while a fundamental one cannot. While it's unknown whether Bitcoin will ever become a unit of account, it is in the realm of possibility. It's also possible that Bitcoin will just remain a store of value, similar to gold. And yes, gold has some intrinsic value but it is negligible compared to its actual value.
jeez... fine so i rounded to the third decimal place (i am clearly retarded)

1:0.9994

You happy?

https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/spy/holdings

And to further correct the reccord:

the equivalent would be the stable coin having $0.9994 in a bank account for every stable dollar they mint not $0 (the $0.0006 was really the important bit in all this)
My one piece of advice is keep your job! Do much less work. But stay at it. Unemployed and burned out can be a dangerous trap that has long term consequences. Much better to barely be working while you sort yourself out. Stay on the horse.
Perl 5.36 Released – What's New?
> I definitely agree that it's a hard problem, but I would be wary about saying it's impossible. This shouldn't be rocket surgery!

The internet has now existed for 3 decades, it's become massively commercialized over the last decade and a half, and this problem still hasn't been figured out without resorting to the mob tactics described in the article. If it's not rocket surgery, why haven't we figured it out yet?

People still want to see the internet as this limitless utopia without boundaries or faults. If we're gonna be wary about throwing around the word "impossible", then we need to start seeing some concrete solutions to these very real, widespread problems. This is basically a modified version of the content moderation problem. You can either include all voices on an online platform and host propaganda and disinformation, or you can try to limit disinformation by removing some users from your platform. You can't do both.

> Perhaps such a site could be a non-profit...

Being non-profit doesn't automatically solve the problem. Wikipedia is a non-profit and its subjected to manipulation all the time. As long as there are people out willing to pay money to have a certain reputation online, there will be no such thing as a truly objective review forum.
I only read part of it. I'll read that part now thanks
Some commenters may need to think about distinguishing between burnout and actual medical depression.

You're burning out when you stop caring about something unfinished that you previously cared for and spent time on, and rationally should still. It can easily happen when your achievements aren't being recognized, valued and/or celebrated by you and others, and when you subconsciously feel that condition has no likely end in sight.

The inspiration and care needed to tackle hard work/problems requires tending to maintain. Cycles of achievement and recognition followed by deliberate reassessment so that the work continues to connect back to your inspiration.
For me, the sign of burnout is when it becomes very hard to do anything and I find myself procrastinating. So I'd say procrastination is a sign of burn out on the horizon. What happens next is you force yourself to do things anyways, and eventually your brain just says "no" - and at that point you hit full on burn out, where your work productivity drops substantially.
Good algorithm should be able to come up with natural language response, with enough compute and good statistical models.

Yet words without feelings are just that, words, and it seems that without measured eletrical responses for said words, you shouldnt claim to understand the difference between a good canned response vs an organism that is sentient and demonstrates awareness of the weight of such words.
What about the time from the input received to the output? it's a total black box, for what we know it could "think" for 90% of that time and just use the last part of gpu power to produce the output (whatever "think" means in this context)

I don't think it should be reasonable to compare it with human reasoning where we think constantly and our brain operates even while we sleep: it is not a human being after all
You probably don’t want that throughout your entire codebase. It’s a lot of overhead. Where you do want it (at API/user input/network etc boundaries), you can use something like Zod[1] or similar to define your type guards and then infer the static types from there.

1: https://github.com/colinhacks/zod
Have you tried Geary on mobile Linux? I haven't (no pinephone or similar), so I'm sincerely asking. It works well in a very narrow window on desktop Linux, so that seems hopeful? I wonder if it's excessively memory hungry or syncs mail inefficiently, though.
> Is there any way to remove an Instagram account without going through the usual channels?

It is amusing how times have changed that a highly technical person seeks help in a highly technical forum for things as basic as removing an account. We are truly entering interesting times.
Yes - they write the content, and get to decide the medium. I dont find long twitter threads hard to read.
I am not sure how it works behind the scenes -- honestly, that's one of the drawbacks of Next, in that a lot of it just "black box magic" -- but it still seems to work fine when we throttle down to 3G. I am not sure how it decides which scripts to hydrate in what order... we were saving that optimization run for the end, but I changed jobs before that could occur (sadly).

There are some ways to work around that, if it actually turns out to be an issue (which it wasn't for us)... discussed it a bit more in my other response: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31727249
This is great. I am glad K9 will live on. I didn't think it wouldn't anyway because frankly K9 is established software and Thunderbird doesn't seem to have anything in that space. It wouldn't make sense to kill it and redo it. This is not Microsoft after all, which would take the product and cripple it so much that it has one third the features and the Microsoft name.

However this particular deal sounds a lot like white labeling, don't you think ? :)
One can also do that with nuclear spin polarized 3He or xenon. The nuclei of these isotopes are sufficiently shielded from the environment that polarization (induced with circularly polarized light scattering off alkali vapor mixed with the inert gas) survives for quite a long time. The polarization is orders of magnitude stronger than that induced by magnetic fields in ordinary NMR.
Depends on the type of data you're processing, your business goals and the existing consumers that you need to support.

At a minimum I'd suggest planning to load the data from the data lake into an RDBMS (OLAP/columnar preferably). Then it's accessible to more than just Python scripts (BI tools, users of other languages, etc).

Depending on how much data there is, should also plan on data summarization strategies. You can either build some common rollups to ensure that consumers are all looking at the same summaries or you can let consumers build their own transform/load pipelines from the raw data lake or you can let consumers build their own transform pipelines from the data in the data warehouse (using something like dbt).

The benefits of a data lake architecture really appear when you have lots of sources, lots of disparate consumers, and lots of data, with some schema evolution & unstructured parts thrown in. If you only have 1 or 2 sources, small enough data to query raw data in Pandas, and consumers are restricted to Python scripts, then you can skip a lot of the architectural headache of building a data lake for now (just make sure to archive your raw data somewhere if you want to be able to pull it into a data lake in the future).
No need to put private currencies in quotes. Here ECB talks about the interplay between public and private money [1] when discussing their CBDC (digital EUR) plans. I think this is a pretty interesting topic and just reducing it to 'private money == not real/useless' doesn't serve it justice.

At all times in unstable monetary conditions, such as hyperinflation, funny-money issued by occupation authorities, unrecognized governments, fiat currency mismanagement, etc, people have flocked to alternative means of exchange. Usually using foreign currencies or other assets (precious metals, whatever). Now there is more choice here. There are reports from places in such conditions of people actually using digital assets for this. Whether it's better to hold Lira or Dash at this particular moment in time though, is a pretty open question.

[1] https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2022/html/ecb.sp220...
Okay - I am fairly bullish on crypto, but it's this kind of thing that gives the rest of crypto a bad name.

Consensus Capital Markets gives validators even more incentive to collude, Just like MEV. There has been numerous occasions where MEV has broken concensus. Theoretically these two concepts are the antithesis of what a blockchain is supposed to do.

These kind of 'Innovations' in harming the ecosystem tremendously. They are taking the centralized nature of normal orderbooks and trying to shove that into crypto.

Mirror was one of the reasons Terra failed and this concensus capital markets allowed the validators to absolutely make a killing during the collapse.
Parent is referring to end-to-end encryption, ie layer 7. However, as you point out, he is oversimplifying. Or perhaps underthinking.
Just want to say thank you for the unlimited delimiters - this was something that always limited my usage of cut so just this feature alone makes tuc worth it
I went to one day of the Apple - Samsung trial in San Jose in front of Judge Lucy Koh. Google indemnifies Android manufacturers against stuff like this, so we were heavily involved.

Samsung put up three expert witnesses the day I was there. Amber Heard's lawyer is incompetent, because she should have asked what they got paid per hour, not the total. They have to know that.

The first guy said he got $450 / hour. The second guy, a very experienced and articulate professor from MIT, got $850 / hour. They asked him how many hours he put in, and he said 900.

Q: So that's a lot of money, huh?

A: It was a lot of work

The last guy was a professor from a university in western Canada (Manitoba maybe). He said he got $350 / hour.

I probably wasn't the only one in the court thinking "Loser!"
From my time reading and watching science fiction I've come to the belief that sentience is not binary. It's not a toggle that is either true or false. It seems like a fuzzy gradient with no definite threshold for becoming sentient. Maybe it is just from increased complexity or maybe there really are some key ingredients. I hope we figure this out in my lifetime though because it is a fascinating question.
A very simple test for workplace burnout: do you feel that 1) customers 2) colleagues are {malicious, idiots, ignorant, lazy, etc.}?

One of the simple models for burnout says that the 5 phases of burnout are: 1) honeymoon phase (just after joining, everything is rosy) 2) realistic phase (there are good and bad things) 3) we as a team are sensible but all these others are {ignorant, lazy, etc.} 4) I'm doing my best but most people are around me are { ... } 5) apathy (I don't care anymore)

Most people leave at phase 4, and the rule is that you can't really move backwards in this process without changing roles. (Possibly inside the same company, but you must change something in the environment.)
> The security you might implement to protect $100 vs $100k vs $100 million is different.

This almost makes sense, except that you have to take into the relative value of that amount, in particular relative to one's total net worth. If I want to protect $100, and that is all the money I have, I'll worry about security a lot. If I have $1,000,000, protecting $100 is not a priority.

The general assumption is that people put all of their money in one place, which is not true for anyone I know -- poor, middle class, or rich. Everyone has cash, bank accounts, various physical valuables, stock, etc.