skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That's (overwhelmingly commonly) a system of two overlapping variables. The observed reliable pathology could be genetic or it could be parenting style. (I happen to agree with you that parenting style matters a lot, but mere observation of genetically intact families doesn't tell you as much as adoptive studies.)
There's no doubt it's very hard to answer. If it were easy, would it be such a contentious issue and worthy of debate here? I am a parent of 3 (ages 5-12) and anecdotally I can say that I am occasionally surprised to notice some behavior that my children have picked up, and it's difficult to know whether it's genetic, because they are biologically mine and I am also one their primary environmental influences. It seems that studies of adoptees and other circumstances that involve non-biological parents as mentioned in the article can provide better answers in this regard.

Also the notion of "spoiling" a child through lack of discipline doesn't look like an old wives' tale to me. There are some wisdoms that have come up through the ages that are correct. Just look around - I try not to criticize parenting styles that are different from mine, but letting your phone babysit your kid is lazy, and you're going to reap the behavioral consequences for that, if you make that decision. It does matter the decisions that you make as a parent, and it does affect who or what your child becomes. Some interactions are probably subtle, but some are also obvious.
This is the first time I've thought about it since the original announcement.

I wonder what I missed? I guess researchers will get to use the communications pages of Elsevier journals to make fun of MIT without anyone noticing!

More seriously, I do wonder what scholarship by researchers who choose to publish there that I missed. Oh well, too expensive to find out...
As an adult, yes. As a child, no. Personality takes time to form, infants aren't born with strong opinions or takes on any particular subjects.
> How about letting users decide to which capabilities they give permission depending on what they need?

No. In a war between Users and Developers the users always lose if there is monetary gain to be had.

It isn’t as simple as “hey if you don’t want this permission that’s okay go on ahead !” It’s “we’re going to get this data whether you like it or not”

I rather Strong strict privacy laws before opening the chrome dominance that will come.
Then perhaps kids shouldn't have unrestricted access to social media? There are a whole host of societal and sociological problems that things like tiktok bring (remember the tide pods fiasco, and any number of things since then?)
wavefunction collapse is nondeterministic (at least, that's my simple understanding). There is no known relationship between wavefunction collapse macroscopic biological systems. There are examples of quantum coherence, though.
That's a very good point - a key feature of the brain is that it's a highly dynamical system with a huge number of variables.

Neurons are all giving each-other feedback in real time, which leads to emergent behavior. To really reproduce this, you would probably need a very different hardware paradigm.
I think bay area is formally about 115k for 4 people to be low-income... So more like 30k/person. More relevant to HN crowds, if that didn't work, Stanford & Berkeley PhD students wouldn't exist. I took a founders paycut for years to be at around 50-60k and still saved money while having fun eating out etc.

We pay our local team multiples of that because that's the local market. However, it's clear the local market is driven by monopoly positions of Google, Facebook, Apple, etc., and the last 5-10 years of crazy capital markets + crypto wave for smaller co's, not COL.

Edit: And apparently by gov standards, local gov doesn't think 25% of SF folks qualify to live there with these kinds of numbers... and yet they do. The standard sets individuals at 80k. That'd be amazing for a lot of people, as it's the diff between housemates / your own 1-2br.
Indeed. The article also really does not introduce the concepts properly. For instance, I started reading it thinking the point of the article was to discuss lessening caffeine tolerance by weaning oneself off of it, but by the end, it promotes caffeine tolerance as a net positive. Confusing.
Much easier to configure and operate. I don’t know performance wise since I only run my personal smtpd on both more than 10 years ago.
We need more of this in America. Perhaps we just need to take the time ourselves and leave no apologies. Too many meetings get scheduled over lunch and people lose their windows of opportunity.

This has somewhat shifted with remote work too and when one decides to take their lunch. I’ve started to do that at the beginning or end of the day because I know I won’t have a chance midday.
You're forgetting that the energy market requires an absolute balance between supply and demand; if you're supplying energy without anyone using it, you're going to have a very bad time.
Additionally, the decision to go to therapy and deal with your own issues so you can be a better parent is a conscious parenting decision, which would never be taken if "parenting doesn't matter".
I had a similar experience. Although I agree that not having the money to buy objects may not affect childhood memories too much, not having the money to spend on social experiences (and I suppose that includes being able to buy objects that allow experiences, like sports kit), does hurt. Experiences with peers are closely allied to experiences with parents and family.
Edited the comment to remove "without value judgement", English is ambiguous and the sentence I wrote could be interpreted several ways, most of which I didn't intend. It should be more clear now.
I suspect yours is maybe a bit more of an American position. In Europe we had borders that were impenetrable everywhere, so we generalized this to the world.

In addition, it’s a question of affluence. We did one big trip (to the United States) as kids, which my parents chose for safety and Disney World. The rest of the world was totally inaccessible to middle class families (not that they would have desired to go).

Certainly places like Burma, Vietnam or Patagonia seemed totally inaccessible to us, so I can emphasize from a German point of view.
That's because your parents put you in a bad environment with bad people and didn't give you tools to protect yourself.
Out of curiosity, have you looked at the original paper and the replication paper? I would think whether the study in Amsterdam shows the original isn't replicatable or not would really depend on how generalized the original paper chose to make the claims in its conclusion. If the original paper concluded their result was generally applicable then the Amsterdam study is, in fact, a valid replication. If it claims to be applicable to only some subset of the population then this is a valid criticism (but if the applicability constraint is too narrow, i.e just that university, then another valid criticism is why did the first paper even warrant publishing??) Makes me wonder if this paper will be overturned in itself in a couple years as the academic machinery turns.
The differentiation here is that these layoffs are not for urgent financial reasons. This is similar to the recently announced Tesla layoffs.

You don’t lay-off 10% of your work force without need, and you don’t do it at random.
The article sounded like self-indulgent dreck.

I see so much romanticization of travel and “broadening one’s horizons” but most of the time I see that the travelers focused entirely on the surface and missed many truly significant details.

My wife is from Thailand so we travel there often. Every time we go there I am reminded how lucky we are in the US. Not just in the economic sense- that’s more superficiality. Natives of many Asian countries are usually very racist by our standards, and homophobic, and you name it. Not in the trivial “disagree on policy” way that the epithets are thrown around in the west. If you spend a lot of time around people you’ll find that they dislike dark skinned people and favor light skinned people. Gay people are socially held up to ridicule; in popular culture they usually play the role of comic relief.

You can’t go two blocks without seeing a picture of the king. There are propaganda videos playing on displays in the airport extolling his virtues. Again, real propaganda, not just political speech that you might disagree with. Don’t get me started on lese majeste laws; you have to know people really well before they’ll open up to you how they really feel.

I say all this because all I see from these wanderlust expand-your-horizons types is trivial - the beauty of the scenery, how good the authentic food was, how nice the people were (did it ever occur to you that being nice is a strategy to extract money from rich western tourists)?

They never bring home the perspective that things in the west are way better than they are in much of the world because of our values.
What exactly is an "attachment" in this context? Ive been using BW for about a year now but I've never come across that term. Is it non-login data like the secure notes section?
It was pretty bad until ‘03, or so, but there were profitable businesses that people flocked to. I worked for a small ISP at the time (the entire bubble/post bubble era) and we bought a lot of equipment and sometimes customer bases off of failed, venture-backed providers.

As an aside, I remember two instances that made me think this is a bubble:

1) We were having some HVAC work done at our data center, and one of the contractors kept asking if I had any “hot” stock tips and shared some he had heard previously about some idiotic .com startup (I don’t remember the exact company, but it was near pets.com levels of stupid.)

2) As a small company that didn’t pay particularly well, we went through a bunch of sales reps, and usually hired people with no telecom/ISP sales experience. One day, we hired two of the best reps from Worldcom. I asked them why they came to work for us and they said they felt like Worldcom was going to implode due to all the fraud going on: sales reps switching their customers between the MCI and Worldcom billing systems every month (which, apparently would trigger a new commission payment) and a coworker of theirs who just suddenly started getting paid $20k per month in commissions, despite not having sold anything. They said the guy tried for months to do the right thing and return the money, but after being told again and again the payments were correct said screw it, bought a sports car and started dating a stripper.

My biggest investing regret is not trading on these realizations — not Worldcom specifically, but the market as a whole. It was like a lightbulb went off about how crazy the whole industry was about six months before the bottom fell out, but I didn’t act on that knowledge at all.
reminds me of Twist only with longer animations and more white space.
And I hope you know that the phrase "repatriating" implies something false. The cash is not stuck in a box overseas. Even though Apple (and google and others) would transfer their profits to a company they set up overseas where there is a lower tax rate, that money ends up in banks and holdings in the US. The hitch, to Apple or Google, is those monies have restrictions on its use, eg, they can't use that pile of cash to build a factory or pay dividends. But what the can do is use that money as collateral for a nearly equivalent amount as a loan which is not so encumbered. It just becomes a game for them to avoid paying most taxes until they are able to get an administration / congress which gives them a tax holiday so they can convert all that deferred money back into normal cash holdings at a much lower tax rate.
The McDonalds hot coffee case is absolutely sane and reasonable. The woman who was injured only sought $20,000 to cover her expenses due to the injury. McDonalds refused to settle before trial, where a jury found McDonalds 80% at fault and awarded the large damages. These were scaled back by a judge, the decision was appealed by McDonalds, and they settled out of court before the appeal case.

But yes they have successfully run a smear campaign to make you think that a greedy woman went after millions of dollars for an injury that she alone caused, which is a wildly inaccurate summation of the situation.
Crypto Bros are the vaguely defined boogeyman, scape goat, and hate magnet for a coordinated disinformation campagain against crypto .. Are you sure you want to associate your position with that kinda PR?
>what we call personality is exactly that which is unchanging in the face of a dynamic environment

I am of the exact opposite opinion, given how much peoples personalities can change given input (think of someone spending all their time alone, and being depressed, changing their lifestyle towards going out every few days to hang out with new friends, and reportedly now having a "cheery personality", or simply someone with no passions discovering theirs, and then feeling like there is meaning to life).
Someone should sue them in Texas.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/09/texas-bans-onlin...
I'd say the golden age of travel (if you mean independent individual adventure travel) was the hippie trail era in the 60s. You could overland through places like Iran and Afghanistan that would be unthinkable today. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippie_trail

That and mass tourism in general has drastically altered most of the places that remain open.
There's a lot of infrastructure around DNS already, it seems to be an under-discussed tool for self-soverign identity. It does depend on ICANN and domain registrars but there is lots of precedent for transferring your domain between registrars or changing the provider you use to serve content at the domain. This is what IndieAuth[1] is built on and I'd love to see more discussion around it.

[1]: https://indieauth.net/
Winter lanterns
If I'm reading GP correctly, the arbitration said that the defendant was on the hook, not Geico directly. Geico doesn't mind if the defendant has to pay up, as long as they don't have to cover it.
Why didn't they foresee this before releasing Node.js 16? OpenSSL 1.1.1's lifecycle[0] was known well in advance of the Node.js 16 release. Why did they release it with an EOL date they could have known was impossible, and then later change the EOL date? This seems like a release engineering failure. Communication now is great but they had an opportunity to get this right from the beginning. As a result, we can all now be certain that Node.js's LTS support dates don't mean anything; they don't have the engineering discipline to make support promises they can keep. On multiple occasions now they've shortened their published LTS support periods after the fact.

[0] http://web.archive.org/web/20210403090336/https://www.openss... -- this is prior to Node.js 16's release
I agree. I don’t know what his motivations were or are. This whole thing about not accounts is even more ridiculous when you consider that Musk was tweeting about not accounts in January. Elon Musk knee bots were a problem before he made an aggressive acquisition maneuver, and knowingly waived his rights.

But people keep telling me this guy is a genius. I guess I’m not smart to understand his level of thinking.
Node 18 will be active LTS in October this year. So they will have 11 month of buffer
Very outdated experimental stuff, maybe during the first iteration of filter API, there was a native filter to do just DKIM signing https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD-extras/blob/filter-dk...

These days one could leverage rspamd filter which does DKIM along with other useful stuff.
And so it has been for 5000 years of recorded history
That handwriting took quite some effort to decipher,

> The defendant may proceed with The Summary Judgement on the schedule set by [M.D.?] Wang and with the word count requested, although The Court [senoudy*] questions whether the requested word count is necessary. / So ordered / John G Koeltl [US D.J?] / 6/10/22

> The plaintiffs may proceed with a motion for summary judgement on the same schedule and with the same word count that The Court has afforded the defendant, and with the same [accusation?] that The Court doubts the need for such lengthy [jargon? japers?]. / so ordered / John G Koeltl / [U SD. 5??] / 6/10/22

Why was the first "plaintiffs" in the typed text underlined? Because it isn't uppercase (“the Plaintiffs”)?

*I just couldn't figure out what "senoudy" was supposed to be until I looked it up and got results for documents where the word "seriously" had been mutated by OCR in the same way that I'd misread it here.
NodeJS becomes LTS in October. That leaves people 11 months to switch. It is out right now albeit not LTS, so you can prep the switch and switch as soon as it becomes LTS.

If they’d move to LTS a month earlier, not a whole lot of people would gain something from it.
Because it's cheaper...
The double negatives in your first sentence are hard to parse.

I think I agree with what you’re arguing though. Basically the scaling hypothesis.
Quantum mechanics isn't a blocker here.

Even if you think quantum mechanics are a necessary part of consciousness, we could use quantum mechanics to simulate quantum mechanics.
Thanks. I'll look into it and see how it goes.
I recently switched from LastPass to Bitwarden, and LastPass has the same issue. I had to manually save all my attachments and upload them into their proper place on Bitwarden. It was frustrating, but also not a big deal in my case. Worse things have happened.

I wholeheartedly agree that these companies should have a warning that attachments won't export. Because I almost forgot about them.
How to use it in case anyone is interested...

https://examples.javacodegeeks.com/core-java/util/logging/ja...
Another tweet thread lists the items which were sold on Etsy, saying the items he sold promoted, supported, or glorified hatred or violence towards protected groups, which Etsy describes as "including items ... demeaning or disparaging towards people based on ... gender identity".
https://twitter.com/SwipeWright/status/1535374172683227136

The graphics on the shirt include male/female gender icons with text "reality's last stand", text saying "thought criminal", and a comic along the lines of "if you yell at me, I'll disagree with you more". -- Those are all fairly inoffensive conservative opinions, or do you think it's reasonable for Etsy to ban him for listing those items?

If there's no indication of other reasons he's getting banned, seems fair to call it a ridiculous banning.
yeah exactly this -- the United States specifically rejected the class status system from Royal Europe and Vedic India, and wrote law and legal precedence to defeat "the regulation, corporate, and State people all come from the same higher classes, all went to the same schools, and eat in the same fancy restaurants in the same bourgeois districts"

human nature has developed over thousands of years at least, so is this still true? partly of course. So, make the world you want to live in.. speak in public, write, participate in civil society.. When money is involved of course there is insider dealing.. and there is legal enforcement everyday .. pick an example, the female South Asian lead Attorney for New York somewhere, a Wall Street enforcer.. look for it, easy to find.

I am all for engagement, much less for repeating stories of old problems as if nothing has changed, right?
> All developmental trauma is the work of parental neglect and abuse

This is a religious tenet associated with recovered memory cults, not something that is true.
Based on what? The inverse is true in my part of the UK.
Now, let's say that you have a car that you'd like to put in a "social car-sharing app." Those participating get an opportunity to make some money, those without cars would benefit from having an increased supply, and your city would benefit because that would mean that the increased utilization of the car fleet would lead to less parking spaces being needed.

Question: how would you do that without rent-extracting middlemen? And even if you are willing to accept a middlemen, why do you think this type of service is not available today? Assume that all the legal barriers for it could be removed - your insurance policy gives you exemption to this and you can have a standard contract defining what would happen in case someone driving your car got involved in an accident, or if you car got stolen by a driver, etc.

If you think that doing that with a car is too complicated, or if you are a cycling advocate: same thing, but for bikes.

Just to make my point explicit: the idea of "trustlessness" is not to get rid of the "trust" in the existing activities that can be handled at the local/"human" scale. The idea is to be able to enable these kind of activities at the higher levels that the institutions (formal or informal) can not cover. If there are things that we can do without a blockchain, great! But think of all the applications that can not be done at all today just because we don't have the tools to enforce the "rules" at a larger scale.
I use DKIMproxy. It's "abandonware" so there won't ever be any ed25519 support, but it gets the job done nevertheless.
The stakes are completely different for manned vehicles vs a DJI parrot loaded with anthrax.

The cost to you — a hypothetical attacker — is now “your life” instead of “$5000”, and the cost to the defending vessel is now “we killed someone :(“ instead of “sorry about your drone no we aren’t replacing it now piss off”.

I suspect if you looked like a Google image search for “fundamentalist suicide bomber”, you might find yourself being asked some anxious questions / shot at.
I will google it for you if you don't remember the syntax.

You might as well just stand behind them and breath down their neck for added effect.

Seriously, that's way too claustrophobic, and not to mention a huge practical annoyance -- for the added latency of having to ask you to google stuff for them and then give you the result somehow, instead of just letting them do it themselves, when all they want to do is get past this trite exercise and start having a real conversation.
At this point, I too would not recommend anyone put their life savings into crypto. Especially given the clearly powerful astroturfing campaign against it. But where can you put it? The banks are not trust worthy, they caused the financial crisis. Real estate, I guess. No wait, real estate being corrupt is what got bitcoin started in the first place.
This article is hard to read, like most media outlets these days. Why do they run so many scripts, that call other scripts, that call other scripts...? Here's the nutshell anyway, via Firefox + NoScript + Ublock Origin and selectively blocking certain elements:

> "Scientists have since figured out that unlike tsunamis, which are large waves produced by a sudden displacement of water from an event such as an earthquake or landslide, rogue waves form due to a chance combination of wave movements through the ocean."

> "Two main mathematical theories have emerged to explain the wave movements that spawn rogue waves: Linear addition and nonlinear focusing. Linear addition assumes that waves travel through the ocean at different speeds, and when they overlap, they can strengthen into a rogue wave. Nonlinear focusing assumes waves travel in groups and can lend energy to one another, which sometimes spawns a rogue wave."

> "One reason for the uncertainty is that rogue waves are rare. Even now, there’s a dearth of quality tracking data."

For those not at sea in a boat, but walking along a coastline, the practical thing to keep in mind is that just because the ground is dry, doesn't mean a sneaker wave can't come along once an hour, so be careful and keep your eyes on the ocean.