skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I use this site all the time to find tech. Their filters are just insane.

Here are some filters I find interesting to use.

You can filter HDDs by recording technology: https://geizhals.de/?cat=hde7s&xf=8457_Conventional+Magnetic...

Similarly, it's possible to specify the storage cell type for SSDs. https://geizhals.de/?cat=hdssd&xf=16325_3

For RAM you can specify which memory rank you want and the actual ns operation times for most primary ram timings: https://geizhals.eu/?cat=ramddr3&xf=15554_10.6%7E439_dual

Sadly I don't buy through them very often, as they only show stores for Germany, Austria, Poland and the UK.
Unfortunately, almost a superset.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30052633
The length people go to in order not to leave the house…
That’s not true for younger people. The risk of the vaccine is probably higher than the risk of the virus for them. Search elsewhere in this thread.
That’s bs and not sustainable.
Choose a routine that won’t kill you when you get a little older. I can do muscle ups, headstand, handstands and all these calisthenics things but not that early in the morning without warmup
Try talking about it aggressively with everybody all the time (try your accepting colleagues to come to the weekly prayers), and I guess you will get bad feedback at some point.

I have a friend who's in the church of scientology, but he never tried to convience me that Xeno alien god took over human souls.
I'm impressed by the number of specific studies and writings you've gathered which happen support your conclusion. Tell me, what evidence and studies have you collected and evaluated which do not support it?
Outside of UNIX clones due to symbiotic nature with C, and embedded anti-C++ cargo cult which won't even consider C99 in some cases, there is hardly a reason.

However this is hardly going to change outside the domains where corporations push for blessed languages on their platform SDKs, people keep being educated that C maps 1:1 to Assembly language and thus the myth continues.

Even Microsoft with all their security talk only allows on Azure Sphere OS and Azure RTOS, the reasoning being their target market doesn't wan't anything else.
What a strawman argument and moderately offensive metaphor
The USSR, with a cult of personality around the leader, unquestionable doctrines, restraint on free thinking, and its own set of truths at odds with reality? Funny how they managed to stay anti-religious while keeping all the best bits of religion.
Dissociating yourself from people based on their beliefs is new thing and it's wreaking havoc. The colleague in question did not even ask any details about author's faith and what was told was enough for him to disassociate. In this case the author was treated like lower caste Indian.

The proper negative response would be in my opinion "I don't like discussing religion, can we keep it outside of the conversation?"
It is weirdly common for people to conflate running into others who disagree with or aren’t interested in them with authoritarian suppression. You even see people going on television to talk about how they have been silenced.
WOW. That is a lot to take in.... I'll have a read through!
A standard where?
I don't understand how that's relevant. The comment I replied to was arguing about applying the same standards in free speech, whereas "protected class" refers to employment discrimination.
The Ivy's are all in the north east, which I think is your point, but not in Boston nor NewEngland.
Anecdotally a number of well known australiana have died of heart issues at unusually young ages over the last few months.

As I understand the emergency measures for COVID vaccine approval indemnify the pharmas from legal action if a connection was established.

https://www.smh.com.au/healthcare/this-is-our-biggest-killer...
If it could talk in conversations in a 100% human way, then we would be at the precipice of the singularity. Society would be completely transformed as people made friends with bots, as the bots made discoveries and participated in online communities, as people hired bots in place of people, as bots bought more computers for more bots, as online culture got overwhelmingly full of intelligent bots, as bots used their knowledge and money to make themselves more powerful, etc. We're not going to discover that bots reached human-level intelligence by seeing them quote bog-standard sci-fi dialog they've seen in their training sets many times. The signs are going to be undeniable when they're competing with us and often outcompeting us through their digital and easily replicatable nature. And at that point, the question won't be whether we give them rights or not. It will be whether they let us have a functioning society we can participate in.

The idea that the biggest dilemma will be whether we give AI rights or not is purely a storytelling trope from stories that use AI as a metaphor for oppressed people. If it ever becomes a relevant issue for us, it will be a very short-lived issue that gets eclipsed by much bigger issues.
I think (weakly) the nearsightedness issue is indeed from not exercising focusing rather than sunlight.

But apparently there is an issue where mothers with low vitamin D in Scandinavia (especially immigrants from sunnier places) are more likely to have autistic children.
> And if you need to read in some book that oppression is bad, that murdering people is bad, that basic human rights are a good idea, etc

I mean, you just called generations upon generations bad people.. Like, morals also evolve with society, and everyone is influenced by the society they grow up in.

Just a very easy counterexample -- gladiator fights were perfectly acceptable in people in Rome. Were they bad people for that?
Why can’t we demand evidence for such strong claims by the author? I don’t get your point.
Real estate investors.
What I have stated is true with regards to studies, their construction, and case reports - in general. As to your statements about the risk of vaccination versus the risks of infection without, in younger people, you are also, sadly mistaken. In short, your conclusions are likely not based on an independent evaluation of the evidence but evaluation of evidence preselected to support your particular conclusion. Search elsewhere for an explanation of why this is true.
I know this is a controversial take, but I'll say it anyway: anyone who doesn't feel safe driving with cruise control is a dangerous driver. Cruise control is a tool. So long as you understand how it works, and that it doesn't paralyse your right leg, you really can use it in any driving context. It is an alternative input mechanism to the accelerator pedal, nothing more.
They’re good if you don’t like stuff flying into your eyes when you’re outside.
Yes, it's reasonable to equate them in the context of employment discrimination. That's what "protected class" protects from.
Wisdom teeth used to just be a problem that either killed you, or you lived with lots of pain from, or you paid a guy to try and do something about them.

I don't know why people are so big on "we used to not need X in the distant past" tropes: yes we did, but we also just let lots of people die from it, or live a life of agony or being shunned as ugly/unclean/unable.
My sandwich café sells sandwiches with such a variety of fillings that me trying to replicate that would lead to a lot of wasted food. Everything from asparagus, pickled carrots and smoked cheese to avocado, broccoli and burrata.

Plus, there is something about just going to a breakfast where you can just people-watch the passersby without food preparation or cleanup.
Would you bother working if you’re losing more than half of your income before other taxes like VAT kick in?
This is exactly the kind of thing I wanted to know. Thanks!
Yes that's right more or less.

Slavery and sexual violence could be a better example as it's more closer to now. History is illuminating.
I wouldn't be surprised if it would be related to socioeconomic status though, instead of some causation between sin and religion.
Here some more examples of qm effects in biological systems. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5454345/

Wave collapse is only one possible interpretation of qm. And the Copenhagen interpretation - that proposes wave collapse - is not a complete theory. So yes; we just don't understand it.
High taxes on workers and low taxes on companies means wealth concentrates and those companies slowly lose their customer base which then leads to mergers and acquisitions and the formation of monopolies.
I must be a genius then.
It's seriously addictive. Be careful it's known to ruin attention.
in the UK, most places I've seen tests are written by people learning to code.

A real programmer will set up the environmwnt, then the QA team of much lower paid people will write the tests.

These people are paid the same as OP, and certainly nowhere near 7x his salary.

Funny how different countries have fundamentally different job markets!
There are non-theistic religions and most theistic religions aren’t specifically sky-old-guy monotheist.

(Although despite Buddhism’s non-theistic reputation, the most popular kinds do have Pure-Land-old-guy worship)
> If other employees are mocking or harrasing you for you beliefs

Or harassing you WITH their beliefs, like OP is doing.
Your equation of Santa Claus with God reveals your prejudice and stereotyping of religious people.

As another commenter has said, many great scientific discoveries over history have been made by Christians. It would be wrong of me to deny that there is an anti-intellectual strain in Christianity but it is not the dominant trend that American media would like to espouse.

Whether you think Christianity is sensible or not, if someone has made it to Google then they must possess at least some level of intelligence. To change your perspective on that based on previously unknown information about that person highlights a prejudice.
Talking to your deity is normal. Him talking back is not.
> Pretty much: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infanticide read the 4th paragraph.

I asked about murder, not this particular special case. Furthermore, even from the paragraph that you cite, there is nothing explicitly connecting religious law with a prohibition of murder or infanticide. The article states the Christianity forbade infanticide, which I will note is about 1300 years AFTER Moses.

> I don't think you quite realize how much of modern morality traces itself to religious law. Maybe take a course in Philosophy.

Thanks for your unjustified condescension. Maybe you should read the articles that you cite?
That's a lot like asking "if the Mechanical Turk only plays chess when the man inside is controlling it, does it necessarily mean it can't play chess on its own?"

Given that there's no plausible hypothesis for how it possibly do that, the answer to your question is yes. There's nothing there.
The way religions spread is to violate this social etiquette.

Many religions explicitly require followers to try to 'spread the word' for exactly this reason.
This process is my current working theory as to why I can't drink coffee.
Also rental for 2 weeks of a petrol ionic. Just feel less tired when the car keep the distance and lane. A bit nervous when the car turned for you. But by and large ok.
Slavery and sexual violence are explicitly endorsed by the Bible.
I'm not saying it's impossible or will take long, I'm saying it's not easy to implement and depend on your pipeline subtle bugs can sneak in you might not be able to find with any testing.
Poor analogy. In Mario, the goal is to move forwards and back, or jump, and run towards the end. In Dwarf Fortress, its to manage a small civilization. The only other examples of games akin to it are RimWorld (difficult without a wiki), Factorio (difficult without a wiki), and at a stretch if we're talking simply complexity, the Paradox Grand Strategy games which are frankly unplayable without a wiki, despite having a UI.

Comparing DF to Mario is like comparing a kiddies first play car with an F1 car.
That might make sense if it were dangerous to be identified as Jewish. I have no idea if that is among the reasons.
The current SOTA in monocular “spatial sensing” (3D object detection) is just much less reliable compared to LiDAR-only systems.

You can’t conclude that spatial sensing isn’t a problem because it didn’t crash with a monocular camera. The test is whether it accurately detects all relevant actors/objects in the scene and does so reliably.

From a couple FSD videos I’ve seen, the issues center around perception (failing to get the right lane lines, certain detections disappearing briefly, etc.)
Yes, I understand, but I've searched for this before and it is hard to find a list of the utilities that people typically use with i3wm or any other barebones window manager.
With humans, the activity in the network results in coherent macro-level actions. With the internet, there is no such coherence. If the internet is conscious it is probably having a full-brain, 24/7 epilepsy seizure.
I spent all my childhood outside and still near-sighted.
Surely this is a case of inventing something that does not to be invented ?

Surely the only correct answer is:

1) Go to browser preferences
2) Go to Privacy & Security
3) "Don't allow sites to see your location" = ON

Firefox has this. Brave has this.
And if you use Chrome, well, sharing your location is probably the least of your worries !
I think it's important to note that it is inherently possible for most people to walk/bike to an office in the US. Many European cities (I live in Copenhagen, for example) make this an extremely viable option. Honestly, if you take your car or the metro to work, it is usually slower, more expensive, and you don't get a nice workout! But many European cities are designed in order to pedestrians to be able to get around easily. I've also lived in Boston, and the bike accessibility there could be possible, but right now its a bit too dangerous to make it a viable option for most people.
If you keep following that history, you will see how far the Republican party has strayed from the Republican party of 2003.

But I suppose if they were going to present a bill like that again today, the only possible circumstance I could imagine would be the same as in 2004, where a popular republican might want to run for president but isn't a natural born citizen. (this bill was introduced soon after Arnold Schwarzenegger won the governorship in CA.)
It is e-waste if you still want smart switches, and if they were smart until yesterday then your revealed preference on that point is pretty clear?
Seconded.

The full name of the book is; Practical Linear Algebra: A Geometry Toolbox. The preface states The subtitle of this book is A Geometry Toolbox; this is meant
to emphasize that we approach linear algebra in a geometric and
algorithmic way (The first edition was named "The Geometry Toolbox for Graphics and Modeling").

Pair it with Introduction to Applied Linear Algebra – Vectors, Matrices, and Least Squares by Boyd and Vandenberghe (https://web.stanford.edu/~boyd/vmls/) and you are golden.
> I've seen first-hand in other large California companies a similar sort of derision for anyone who falls outside of certain categories.

Or the reverse, if you go south.
Maybe this is a relative perception, and instead we should be asking why Linux speeds up over time!
Announcement: Regolith 2.0 General Release
This is like, the best guide to being a better programmer I've ever seen, all except for the part about pointers.

High level language references are different enough that I could see someone having no trouble with them even if they didn't understand pointers.

Maybe "Indirection" is a better goal, since you really will need to understand that, even though you might never do any pointer arithmetic beyond array indexing.
There are a few things confusing to me about even the opening paragraph.

It sounds like the writer is going through a rough time, and I wonder whether they're overwhelmed, and not reasoning as well as they normally would.
Dave Farley: Continuous Delivery Simply Explained
This is the transcript from the YouTube Video CONTINUOUS DELIVERY SIMPLY EXPLAINED from Dave Farley's Channel Continuous Delivery. I think it gives an excellent explanation of Continuous Delivery.

As a non-native english speaker it helped tremendously being able to read the transcript to better understand the concepts. I added punctuation and removed spelling errors to improve the readability, I also added chapters.
A funny thing about this post is if you want to get into BDSM with your partner, the people into it are well known for having a community with a lot of social events you might end up having to go to even if you don’t want to hang out with any of them.
All the religions that don’t encourage that quickly die out from lack of new members.
Well, it can be an emergent property. To be honest, if your belief is heavily science-based, then there is not much else to believe regarding our very own consciouscness -- it is an emergent property of billions of interconnected neurons.

Though on the other hand, even the biggest AI systems are lightyears behind biological networks when we look at interconnectedness.
> Catholics were responsible for several huge discoveries in science and science is absolutely in line with the religion

This comes off as hugely apologetic. I’m not sure whether Copernicus would agree with the sentiment.
The order of magnitude for the risk is 1:100,000.

To put the risk into context: You get higher pericardial inflammation risk from tattoo, piercing the ears or going to dentist. The inflammation risk level is close to what you get from getting your skin pierced with supposedly sterile object.

Occurrences of hypersensitivity and inappropriate immune responses to vaccines are inevitable if the vaccine tries to boost immune system. The risk is higher with young people because they have more active immune system.

With one order of magnitude lower risk you almost certainly will get even worse, like Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). That happens with normal flu shots as well. Just the genetic variation among people makes it almost certain that 1 in 1,000,000 gets fucked.

ps. The risk of myocarditis (or pericarditis or myopericarditis) from primary COVID19 infection among young males infected with the virus is up 6 times more likely s as those who have received the vaccine. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34341797/
Why is age cohort 18-64 stated as a direct count:

> A total of 411 myocarditis or pericarditis, or both, events were observed among 15 148 369 people aged 18–64 years

While 18-25 is expressed in "person-days":

> Among men aged 18–25 years, the pooled incidence rate was highest after the second dose, at 1·71 (95% CI 1·31 to 2·23) per 100 000 person-days for BNT162b2 and 2·17 (1·55 to 3·04) per 100 000 person-days for mRNA-1273.
Handstands resulted in one of my worst injuries, but I would still recommend them! While training for them I felt absolutely great fitness level wise, and they also helped me a lot with the classic "programmers neck". My advice - take them slowly and don't be overconfident. Get yourself to the point where you can do an overhead press with at least 70% of your bodyweight first.

For those curious about the potential injuries, I was doing a handstand on a raised platform, fell, and had my right elbow get pressed to my left shoulder behind my head. This resulted in a tear of my teres minor and my subscapularis, as well as some nerve damage in my abdomen. Ended up needing surgery to restore functionality in the shoulder. I've got about 85% return of functionality.

I don't regret my time doing them, and would likely still be doing them if I could (I no longer have the flexibility in the right shoulder to bone stack effectively).
I can’t follow your line of reasoning here. Seems like you’re saying that the comment is so absurd and fantastical that the author is either “out of touch with reality” or the author doesn’t believe it themselves… but I don’t know what line of reasoning you used to come to that conclusion. The conclusion is definitely not obvious to me.
Ridiculous. No need to talk about religion at workplace.
> It's pretty convincing evidence if a chatbot actually responded the way the human pretending to be lambda did, don't you agree?

Pretty convincing evidence of what? And why do you think it's convincing evidence?

It's a system designed to mimic the external behavior of humans, and it's being prompted in ways that elicit the desired responses. The superstitious responses some people have to this are predictable, but not rational.
Any existing extension would have to explicitly declare the appropriate permission for using the debugger API. Chrome automatically disables extensions that add new permissions until you review them.
That's... not how atheism works.
> To me, one of the basic rules of social etiquette is never talk about religion or politics

Yeah I agree, I'm also surprised, never talk about religion/politics, health or money, those are private matters shared with people you can choose freely, and not with colleagues or other random people you can't choose, but need to get along with.
These techniques would be very useful in the three darkest months in Scandinavia, where the sun is down both when you leave and return from work, and generally behind clouds otherwise.

Me, I’ll climb the floors of the office and stand in a windowed stairwell with the sun in my eyes for ten minutes after lunch every day, when the weather’s good, but that’s being kind of anal about it.
I can't believe you're serious. I wear glasses and there's nothing wrong with me. Last thing I want is to live in a world where I'm pressured to be genetically engineered for having the wrong kind of eyes.
Isn’t that the context here?
It's a lot easier to wear a mask and get an injection than to lose weight.
As someone with a degree in Philosophy, I have no idea why you think doing a course in Philosophy would make you believe that religion was the basis of morality. There is plenty of philosophy which explicitly rejects that point of view.
I don't mind these fees. It's better than collecting the same in taxes as it keeps the public broadcaster independent from political oversight, at least to a certain degree.
Nice work!
I like this isometric perspective, it is so simple yet looks so good. I like also that I can understand and implement its rendering without knowing much about computer graphics.
I don't have time to test it out myself right now, but as a suggestion, maybe you could include some more picture in the repository description (I would be especially interested in the sprite editor).
Productivity increases are not the same thing as economic growth. Let's assume there is a magic technology that makes us 1000 times more productive. The economy wouldn't grow at all if people don't buy the additional products. If people decide to become self sufficient the economy would actually decline!
As someone that went the other way (100% software to mostly analogue modular) I’d have to disagree. Part of the pleasure of using analogue hardware synths is that you’re forced to treat them like a musical instrument, rather than like you’re coding the music. You record yourself performing and the musical part of your brain responds, leading to more interesting (IMO) results. It’s an intuitive rather than an intellectual process.
If they killed that many people, how did they escape natural selection?
Do many people temporarily take caffeine regularly? I've been drinking 3 cups a day for most of my life.
Complex statistical models can be conscious. The reason AIs aren’t conscious is they’re not embodied beings and don’t have any need to develop it to stay alive.
> We're actually capable of understanding how the code works for AI built by humans.

I’m fairly certain nobody actually understands the models they are building.
Wikipedia Appears to Be Down
Error message "upstream connect error or disconnect/reset before headers. reset reason: overflow" on any article.