skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> However, the issue this brings up about structs / types not explicitly declaring which interfaces they implement is a real and unaddressed problem, especially in large codebases. The only tool that I'm aware of that finds implementations is GoLand, at steep JetBrains prices.

So are you trying to find implemented interfaces or interfaces' implementors?

Former: In Vim I can use `:GoImplements`, which internally calls `guru` I guess.

Latter: `gopls` supports this.

I agree it's still a pain that one can not tell directly from code what interfaces a struct implements tho.
What is the difference between something explained by the "Greater Fool Theory", and any of the numerous things that simply increase in value over time due to increased demand and/or rising scarcity?

It seems to me the only difference is whether the speaker is predisposed to not like the thing in question.
I don't think he openly ran it. He just got caught.
I wish UI designers would just leave stuff the hell alone when it works fine. System Preferences has been one of the most consistent parts of OS X/MacOS for 20 years now and I really appreciate that consistency. I know where to find stuff. Instructions and guides on the web remain relevant when new versions are released. Yes, occasionally things move around a bit and icons change, but not too much.

Mac is not iOS and it shouldn't be. I really dislike the trend of taking UI concepts that are great for a smartphone and applying them to a large display.
TBH, I don't really know with certainty how conditions are in an Amazon warehouse. I do have Outside View, which tells me that they have no problem finding employment, and I haven't heard of major reasons why Amazon in particular would trap employees (like company towns of old, with company stores and other predatory practices).

So I think it's pretty fair to say that the burden of proof is on you that Amazon is worse than industry average, since people are voting with their feet to work for them.

I will tell you one thing in advance: if you touch systemic issues (such as unemployment in general), then you're advocating for a freer market with less unions, because that's how you create jobs.
It’s around 20 lines of Python (with no third party dependencies) to write a TOTP generator, so no.
it was never really 'money', or even 'theirs' - just a consensual delusion that's falling apart
- The 4-hour work week- Tim Ferris
- How not to diet- Dr. Michael Greger
- The Iliad- Homer
- Norwegian Wood- Haruki Maurakami
- Kein - Jose Saramago
- Dark Matter and the dinosaurs- Lisa Randall
Technically, according to Top500, they're not the fastest anymore.

The #1 right now is held by Frontier over at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, with Rmax 1.102 EFlop/s.

That doesn't mean that it's not an extremely capable system, though. (And Fugaku's performance seems not that well reflected in the HPL benchmark.)
Floptimus Prime
That mucus usually supports digestion of food, AFAIK?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gut_microbiota

Are you suggesting an IV-drip with likkidfood instead?
> No wonder that it's hard for some people to see the Ponzi schemes, pyramid schemes and what else those things are called.

On the other hand, it's quite easy. After the third flavor of ETH and nested contracts, I thought to myself "fuck, that's complicated." Then just follow Buffett's advice of not investing in things you don't understand.
how is it negligible that you can't go to work without a car?

if said car breaks down you have to pay (and spend time) to repair it. many people live paycheck to paycheck, no savings. payday loans and credit card loans are a problem in the US and it's not exactly a coincidence.

of course people in said European cities who can't afford a car also usually don't frequent Starbucks and don't buy avocado (unless maybe if it's on sale), that doesn't mean transportation as a factor is negligible.

> The world economic situation ...

is a completely structural problem. the world needs to spend less of its economic surplus on unsustainable stuff, and this includes everything with externalities (from things like watering the desert in California on an industrial scale to housing/heating/cooling/moving people and freight around using costly ways) and allocating more to building infrastructure for energy generation (and transmission and storage), healthcare and education.

of course strictly speak we don't need to. feudalism was fine, most people got used to it.
Struggling to recruit postdocs, calls for academic structural changes intensify
It's hyperbole because you consistently ignore the fact that eyes can change focus for the short term, that's like the one thing they do. It's straining your eyes for long periods, at the same focal point, such as while working, that we need to help with.

PS: you are right, maybe instead of only at the desk, just wear a "near sight" pair all the time, when you're indoor, and a far sight pair when you are out. Point is you dont have to hot swap.
One could easily point out that murdering people isn’t a function of socialism (eg Where all the dead Swedes?), but rather authoritarianism.

Authoritarians — regardless of their purported economic philosophy — always leave the streets red.
How did you get from my comment to forbidding anything? I actually hate this mindset with burning passion. Newsflash: you can disagree with something, and yet do not want it forbidden or banned or canceled.
Does anyone have any inkling about Voyager? I only ask because when I was looking into it last year, seemed everyone said 'use Celsius or Voyager', so I assume they are somewhat similar. I used Voyager to get 9% APY on USDC just to test it, but chickened out and withdrew it all because I basically envisioned something like this happening.
The article is from 2019 and things were in pretty good shape then...

Were they, though? I mean, things have gotten worse since then - but that doesn't mean we were doing well then. Simply that things got worse.
>In Java, there’s no way to know whether a variable is null.

What? What about `foo == null`?
For comparison, in Go it would be:

foo := func() string {
if bar { return "this" }
return "that"
}()
Programming producing art - something like this? https://dgopstein.github.io/articles/ioccc-ascii-art/
Premature optimization has become an umbrella term for people defending poor choices during implementation. Not doing simple mistakes that kill performance for no benefit or choosing option B over A where both take equal effort but B is 20x times more performant should be common sense.

Unfortunately, 9 times out of 10 I hear these often quoted phrases is when engineers defend their status quo bias during code review.
> Burry diagnosed the "greatest speculative bubble of all time in all things" in June 2021, and warned buyers of meme stocks and cryptocurrencies were headed for the "mother of all crashes."

Such amazing insight. There is a doom bloviaton roster who get trotted out in the financial press to state the obvious post-facto every time there is a market correction and they can generally point to their track record of having predicted 20 of the last 3 crashes.
And now some of them have entered to fractional ownership... Meaning some people are there for speculation not even some type of ownership of collection... Or at least I think very few would think owning part of card stored somewhere is collecting... Really asking question does this make sense at all.
It is silly that we naively define diversity by what is trivially measurable, which tends you can determine of a person without knowing anything of their person. Give me a campus with humanistic diversity. Let us lower the entropy of the intellectual space.
Right. And if you have batteries, which could take 700kW peak, but are only charged with 350kW peak, it is no longer "fast charging" in the sense of impact onto the battery.

But the big future is anyway to have the car plugged into a modest outlet when parking during the day so they can take up any excess solar power available on the grid and possibly even partially power your home over night.
You mean imprisoning the leaders of the unions and the social democratic party?

(I get what you mean, but IMO reducing Bismarcks policy too introducing pensions seems way to simplistic. Especially how that worked out a few decades later...)
what was the the business model of these platforms? did they lend out the staked money, or how did they generate these yields?
Looks like it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Bezos#The_Washington_Post

I wouldn't be surprised if it's an attempt to muddy the waters, misleading actual investigators.
Yet, Java-codebases look the same now as they did then. The program structure is still "externalized" to a container because of a lack of abstractions. It's still exactly the same.
Well, I was referring to the charging infrastructure and all current Tesla superchargers installed can deliver up to 250kW and Ionity here in Germany always installs 350kW chargers - that the battery of current cars cannot accept that for long or at all is exactly the topic why this new battery technology might be a big improvement.
There's a popular theory (hormesis I think it's called) that says this. It's also just something that's popular among people that are "just logically thinking" / "using common sense", I've heard it for as long as I've had glasses (decades).

Not a single doctor has agreed with this sentiment and I've never found any significant studies conducted that support this claim. If it were true you would expect it to have a lot more actual backing than it does, especially given how long the theory has been around now.
Wouldn't be possible to have very large capacitors that act like a buffer? Maybe charge the capacitor for an hour and when a fast charging car arrives, simply use the stored energy in the capacitor?
Also, we need to finish the transformation before running out of coveniently/cheaply available non-renewable resources. Given how slow such large long-term changes take, starting early isn't such a bad idea.
There was a Reddit thread in recent weeks about a related topic and there were a decent number of bullied males talking about how much they thought about shooting up their school. IMO, it's very possible that it's an intersection of bullied + having the means + propensity (for the most part, aggressive/aggrieved males).
Yes but a "rapid" security update that doesn't force a reboot is more likely to get under the radar
Perhaps that is true of you and your neighbors but US unemployment is at a low not seen in over a decade

Employment doesn't give you a snapshot of how well things are doing, though. If you can't get a job that pays your rent, things aren't doing well even if you have low unemployment. I'll also mention that part of the low unemployment isn't because things are doing well, but because folks have died, we've had a pandemic, and a number of folks have dropped out of the workforce because of things like child care, remote schooling, and retirement (pushed forward by the pandemic).

Employment doesn't mean things are going at least OK.
No, nothing I did was crime. If you reached that conclusion you need to re-read the entire thread.
IDE Shaping with Live Commands
Thanks! The submitted title was "Rofessor Eric Laithwaite: Motors Big and Small", but rather than correcting the typo, I think we can move Professor Laithwaite to the background. Not that he isn't important, but HN titles tend to be better when they focus on content rather than personalities.
Actually, I think that's a pretty conversation starter. Can you please tell me who is suffering from Amazon existing? Who has a net negative outcome from that?
Wouldn't interfering with unions mean attacking free speech and freedom of assembly, which is the opposite of socially progressive?
Great project, well-bounded and insightful! Do you think about making it open source? I was thinking about trying to use another JSON library and make it work with tinygo, but don't want to repeat the work.
Diversity is not anti fun. Black people, Hispanic people, Asians, everyone else, lots of them are fun. Judgmental people are not fun. Woke scolds are not fun. People who get diversity jobs are not fun. The same personality type that were judgmental Christian censorship happy party haters in the 1950s are judgmental censorship happy party haters now.

Let us hope that just as the 1960s followed the 1950s or the Roaring Twenties followed Victorian prudishness these people see their values trampled underfoot. Let freedom reign.
Everything in this comment except "pretty interesting" is lifted word-for-word from the article - why is it framed as if it were your own comment?
I have zero idea. I did get the correct APY for one month before withdrawing, paid no fee, and was left with the same question.
Most assets are, at least in theory, backed by something that can turn a true profit in an efficient market. Anything that's based on capital-intensive resource extraction can pay a dividend on the profit from that capital. Anything that's based on real estate will go up in price as population increases. Anything that's manufactured or based on IP can pay a dividend based on the value delta between inputs and outputs.

In general, anything that turns a raw material of some sort into a more refined product (be it iron ore into steel, steel into machines, or electrons into advertisements) is adding economic value into the system. By doing that work, the total net wealth of humanity increases. The economy is positive-sum, and so investing in anything that's correlated with the economy as a whole should be worthwhile.

Bitcoin doesn't work that way. Trading Bitcoin isn't adding to the total net worth of humanity. Mining Bitcoin arguably could be, because the ability to make transactions has some value, but the practical value of those transactions is less than the value of the electricity, computer hardware, and pollution that go into making them. Speculating on Bitcoin does nothing productive; it's zero sum. Net-zero systems are nearly indistinguishable from gambling unless you have insider information.
You don't need NATGW at all if you use ipv6 egress-only gateway (which is free I believe)
You only need an editor if you're trying to sell your work.
You can easily dissipate 7.2 kW outdoors, just blow a bunch of air through.
Yes, it was "My Bonnie is Over the Ocean". We played it only once or twice because we were afraid that this could break the disk drive and there just was no money for a new one :)
it's the derivative bubble all again

or more precisely

using collateral that's already beind used for collateral for something else.

see also rehypothecation
This doesn't solve heat dissipation.
I also use Vim.

1. Use `:=` whenever you can, so types are inferred by the assignments/allocations
2. Alternatively query all references from `gopls` and put the results into quick fix list, then `:cdo`
That's just not how it works.
Let me rephrase my thought: shooters do what they do not because they are white and male, because there are plenty white males who don't do it. But we can't deny there is something happening within that demographic that makes it more prone to commit this particular crime.

> My point is that if we keep saying "young white males have it all" when they don't, they will start to think "well why don't I feel complete, if I have it all?"

Not to discount this, but teenage angst has been around for generations. How come young men today decide to shoot their classmates instead of, idk, writing bad poetry or standing under the window of a girl that rejected them, the way their fathers did? I think the main deciding factor is being exposed to a certain brand of toxic masculinity that promotes misogyny and equates violence with power. One of the strongest red flags for mass shooters, leaving depression, bullying, etc etc far behind, is a history of misogynistic behavior and domestic violence.

You can disagree with my interpretation, of course.
But then we need to wait for the charging station to charge. How many of those batteries would a charging station need to ensure continuous service?
wow, that's quite something!

>a friendly tutorial

>54,019 words 307,466 characters

it's basically a flat file docs
Well, at some level people paid fiat to get in and they are losing that.
In what way is Amazon "definitely socially progressive"? At most they put up a pride-themed logo on social media once a year, and only in countries with governments that are amenable to it.

If you mean they are equal-opportunity exploiters, then ok I guess. But Amazon is not progressive at all, they are driven only by calculations of profit and power. It is no different to pseudo-progressive politicians like Obama, Hillary Clinton, etc. who for example had their public relations teams flip a switch on the messaging around gay marriage the moment that the demographic data showed that it was acceptably palatable to the general public.
Still, undercutting the opposition by beating them to the punch in creating a proto-social welfare state is something that few other reactionaries have tried since.

Sure, sure, Amazon has increased the base rate for their warehouse workers, but it’s clearly not enough.
Presumably, the array of lamps would not be aimed at humans, and turn off if a human stepped in the way.

Even then, it would only be a problem at the (common) focal point of all the lamps.
Existence of government? No.
Corrupted government? Yes.
At this point in history, if anyone honestly thinks that maximizing shareholder value is a good highest goal for a corporation, they are just blind.

It's clear in situations like this to see that the only reason Amazon is doing this is for power and money, and probably just money.

If we want to survive another 100 years, corporations have be brought to heel somehow, and if that means legislation to curtail stock buy backs instead of re-investment, or altering what fiduciary responsibility means to include the wellbeing of employees, not just shareholders, I'm fine with that.

But this current system is taking us nowhere good.
You don't need to water cooled machines, you can use use cold water to chill air.

Heating a community of houses rather than emitting into the air seems like it should be a requirement for building any power hungry industry.
Step 1: get lots of venture capital (860 million)

Step 2: give away money

Step 3: somehow start making money

Like most companies you'll see on HN, they are currently on step 2.

The discerning reader may note that this sounds like a terrible use for $860 million - and if that's the case, how much of the other $642 billion last year was properly allocated?
> What kind of impact does dumping all that sand have?

The sand gets wet and sits in the water. It's sand, i.e. dirt. In case you weren't aware, there's already dirt at the bottom of all lakes.

> What about running the bulldozer over the Stanford campus?

The ground would get slightly compacted and maybe some grass torn up. That's why they got clearance from the person responsible for that, the groundskeeper.

> What if someone is injured by the bulldozer?

They will learn an important lesson about bulldozer safety.

> I wouldn't trust teenagers renting an after-party bulldozer who never cleared that with anyone, never notified anyone, and have no proof of training.

If you ever find yourself running a bulldozer rental place, you're free to not rent to them.
BlueBay (RBC) Shorting Japanese Bonds until BoJ breaks
>A sunk cost fallacy depends on expected future cost still being higher than future benefit.

And that manifests as keeping the employee as opposed to replacing him with a more experienced person who already knows how to not make expensive mistakes.

In the context of SWE, specifically with a blameless culture, these expensive mistakes aren't training for people, but training for the business as new checks and protocol get established to reduce the change of the same thing happening again. Someone making an expensive mistake is independent to whether they get to stick around. In the example this expensive training is a reason to keep the guy around.
Me too. Poorly worded title; suggests the opposite. I thought it might be something different so was intrigued and then disappointed to see the normal angle.
Follow up: How does the HTML "remember" the events to replay without any help from Javascript?
He's Executive Chairman now, and he still owns about 10% of it.
Really useful comment, what is "that" and how is "that" wrong?
spinnin
Does nobody tell them that they are being ridiculous?
I think you're confusing a Crypto with NFTs. One is virtual money, the other is virtual certificates.
I see what you did there but for me at least it's not Rankine.
> "Relationships are far more important than jobs, money or houses."

In the movies, maybe: "As long as we're together, nothing else matters".

In reality, relationship success often depends on certain fundamental things being in order. Like financial security and comfortable living arrangements.
Usually people wear crutches for short-time only because they are recovering from some sort of injury. Obviously leg strength degrades because of the lack of exercise, but walking around with a broken leg also leads to a lack of exercise and reduction of leg strength.
Going on nine_k's answer, at 600V you'd also need a charging cable to handle 1200A. That's so thick (~50mm) a 3m cable's going to weigh 52KG. I'm sure somebody will jump in and suggest an alternative. Let's just put 10kV through the car. Then it's only 72A. Nothing bad happens at 10kV.

Burst-chargers are silly. They might work, they might not, but either way they present such immediate problems for mass deployment that they should be considered a distraction.

What we need today is "little" 10-15KWh replaceable battery pods. We're still talking up to 80KG, but something to get you 50 miles. These could be cycled out, cool-charged and essentially offer unlimited range to anyone without adding significant delay.

You could also lower the onboard cost of new cars by reducing the standard battery size. I want a Tesla, but I need about 20 miles range for 99% of the time. Buying a 15KW battery and hiring the extra would be a better solution for me.
I would just scrap the video entirely.
Flash Player releases toward their later years were codenamed after San Francisco street names, in alphabetical order (a bit like Android's alphabetical dessert names).

Another fun thematic one from that era was Adobe's Flex platform, which had two separately codenamed parts: an SDK and an IDE. One release cycle both codenames were food related: Burrito and Hero (like the sandwich). So the follow-on minor release of course used the codenames Super Burrito and Superhero. The overall platform got the codename Superstar (i.e. "Super *"). And then I think the next release after that became "Megastar." As far as I know none of that was planned in advance, much like the story above.
> Does this seem suspect to anyone else?

Yes. Things are not fine.

The trouble with journalism is that there's too much punditry and too little reporting. Newspapers used to have large staffs of "beat reporters", who went out, gathered news, and sent it in. Today, most "news" begins as a press release. Check cnn.com. Everything above the fold today started as a press release or statement from someone, or is an opinion piece. Fox News is worse.

Collecting local news is now more the job of local TV stations, because they need video.
The best experience is to close the app/ site as soon as the first ad shows before a video. Not sure if it was actually the case, but after strictly following this, I thought I had trained the algo to not show me ads for a while.
And if any AI ever produces great writing, it will only be because it has become capable of genuine originality, as many human beings already are and will continue to be no matter what AI does. Rare perspectives aren't going to get exhausted, either by AI or by an increasing human population with more literacy and leisure time. For every piece of low-hanging fruit that gets plucked, several seeds get scattered and new trees spring up.