skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The question isn't really whether people use extensions. Obviously they use and enjoy them when they're there.

The question I'm asking is how Firefox manage to take 25% of Microsoft's market share, but Ubuntu didn't? Ubuntu has always been much more customizable than Windows, just like Firefox was much more customizable than IE. LibreOffice allows you to continue using the "classic" UI, just like how everyone on HN complains that Microsoft's Ribbon was a mistake, yet somehow LibreOffice remains at a partly 200 million to Microsoft Office's 1.2 billion. Why were customizable libpurple IM clients never as popular as the official ones?

This is why I think Firebug breaking the compatibility/market-share death spiral and inducing developers to make their webapps work in Firefox irrespective of Firefox's market share is so important. It's the biggest factor I know of that's actually different between Firefox's situation and the situation with so many other FOSS products.
AMD Announces Genoa-X: 4th Gen EPYC With Up To 96 Zen 4 Cores And 1GB L3 V-Cache
> this does not sound to me like we know the "function" of these genes, only that they're nessary for each phenotype

But they're not even measuring the phenotype. They're using the transciptional signature as a substitute for phenotype/cell function (i.e. the bag of RNA model). This is a poor substitute if you try to apply this to practical applications such as cell engineering. Let's say I perturb a cell to match it's transcriptional signature to that of a neuron. Does that make it a neuron? Not if it doesn't function like a neuron.
Does the west actually believe that Russia has money or resources to expand? It can barely fight in Ukraine. It's a broke country with a superiority complex and any thought of expansion is just nonsensical.
Is it? Having lived in Washington since the age of 4 and voted in virtually every election since I turned 18, I’m not aware of this.
> Deflation being much much worse is a nice joke.

Deflation is more of a nightmare than a joke. It basically means the economy has significantly contracted and that wages are going to plummet across the board. This leads to a massive spike in debt defaults.
https://store-usa.arduino.cc/products/arduino-mkr-vidor-4000...
Their words are backed by nuclear weapons.
You can run x64 containers on M1, it's just slower. Just add the `--platform linux/amd64` flag
None of the items in your list are the cause. Also, none of the items in your list are things that you're not allowed to talk about or blame for stuff.

Hell, it's practically a legal requirement to blame global warming or Trump for all societal ills these days.
Actually, there was a better mail user's shell, mush[1], that was ultimately murdered by its insane license[2] which forbade any modification to the source; I remember trying to puzzle through how to apply the various patches I'd found to make it compile and then do useful things.

Sad, but a good lesson in how a bad license on good code kills the program.

(links to the netbsd copy of the code since I can't find a more reasonable project home, likely because terrible license)

1. http://cdn.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/current/pkgsrc/mail/mush/in...
2. http://cdn.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/current/pkgsrc/licenses/mus...
Hi HN, I am Anubhav from RamanLabs. We have been developing end to end Computer-vision modules to make it easy for developers, hobbyists to integrate such functionality into their applications with minimal amount of code.

All modules are developed to run real-time on consumer-grade CPUs[0]. For now we are releasing only Python-language SDK. Demos are provided to allow users to test performance on desired data-distribution.

Framework powering these modules in completely written in Nim language, which under the hood wraps some Operation's implementation provided by libraries like OpenBLAS/CuBlas.

We also maintain a blog[1] where we hope to share more underlying technical details.

[0] Quad-core CPU with AVX2 instructions.

[1] https://ramanlabs.in/static/blog

[2] https://ramanlabs.in/static/tutorial
It's kind of a question of progress. Maybe being able to extract a complex abstraction through statistical means is close to 'understanding' or 'consciousness', or maybe abstractions are to consciousness what an amino acid is to a living organism. We don't understand consciousness well enough to confidently say.
> That doesn't really address people circumventing copyright during that 14 years.

This is really the crux. How many lawsuits have there been where someone used a patent for personal use, shared their use on the internet and was sued for millions of dollars and lost in court? (even 1?)

I feel it's an absurdity that I can spend _millions_ making a widget and after 15 (or 14?) years anyone can use my design for free, and somehow people support this limitation for patents but not for copyrights. (and we still have a vibrant economy based on patents)
it isn't really _designed_ for JS based applications, but if you're not at least running vite/webpack/etc with PurgeCSS then your builds will be rather bloated and you lose out on customizing the settings - if you really just don't care, then you can run the default CDN build
For the interested, the successor to the History API is the Navigation API:
https://developer.chrome.com/docs/web-platform/navigation-ap...
The implication here being that people put as much faith in the dollar 2y or as they do 10y (low confidence), correct?
Where are you going instead?
10x as many Haitians, Cubans, Venezuelans and Brazilians as the year before is new. That's very, very new.
Can a biologist fix a radio? Or, what I learned while studying apoptosis (2002)
War is always a risk. No matter how over optimistic he was it's too big of a risk for a small poll bounce. This is about revanchist nationalistism/securing legacy/rebuilding the empire
> > This expansion will only end with WW3.

> Attempts to meet this expansion with appeasement will end in WW3.

Or, perhaps, this war already is WW3, the question is how it ends, not whether it starts. (Yeah, most of the big powers aren't openly directly engaged, just supporting one of the belligerents with military and economic aid and intelligence and sanctions on the opposing belligerent. But that's a choice of how to fight the war, and that's been made very clear—the US explicitly invoking lend-lease in naming it's aid bill for Ukraine couldn't be a more pointed declaration of how it sees the situation.)
The comment referred to specifically said "board salaries", not executive pay more broadly.
Oh well, first of, thank you for writing ripgrep! Great work, love that tool and use it daily :)

All good, thank you for sharing your POV! I find both theory and the practical engineering feats quite interesting, and actually understood the original question as a theoretical question, not a question about general-purpose regex engine. Quite possibly that this is even how the asking person was intending it, in hindsight.

Last thing on topic (talking now about having complement and unicode in a usable regex engine): My personal, gut-feeling-based hunch is that by adding all these features not strictly related to regular languages, we kind of evolved our regex enginges and expectations towards them into a corner of the design space that works well, but might not work well when one adds complement. It feels like a constructivist world without negation and stuff on top that works, and reverse-engineering what works with negation and what not will likely be hard work. As a theory-ish kind of person (without much insight into regexes or formal grammars), I wish there would be some kind of insight into what are the atoms of a regex and which atoms can be combined witch which other atoms - I would bet that fancyFeatures and unicode+complement would have a high algorithmic complexity already in theory.

Any final tipps on the repo I linked to not disappoint users expectations? :)
Absurd p-hacking:

3 treatments (meat, milk, oil "energy"), plus control, and 3 tests.

> children receiving supplemental food with meat significantly outperformed all other children on the Raven's Progressive Matrices.

> Children supplemented with meat, and children supplemented with energy, outperformed children in the Control group on tests of arithmetic ability.

> There were no group differences on tests of verbal comprehension.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14672297/
I also recommend Ryan North's book, How to Invent Everything

https://www.howtoinventeverything.com/

Because you'll need a little humor if you're stuck in post-apocalyptic world
First and foremost, the author advocates for organising documents in a much flatter DOM tree. In this style all major page elements sit at the same hierarchical level, so there is no "mess of nested elements", the is no need for visual indication of hierarchy if there is no hierarchy to begin with.

I think that is a very compelling format for a text-first web page, like a blog post or news article. Of course it is a coding style not well suited for complex web apps with deep hierarchy.
uBlacklist is actually better than Kagi for a multitude of reasons.

http://len.falken.directory/web/overall-disappointed-in-kagi...

Expresses it a bit better...
Absolutely. I tend to be mystified and lost without some way to place what I'm doing in some larger context, even if that context is super-vague or wrong in technical ways.

Had several teachers who utterly refused to provide that, repeating "it'll all make sense eventually." Well, it did, after I got better teachers.
"you'll own nothing and be happy"

!
From what I remember their cards were just superior in both graphics power and power usage. 3dfx kind of dropped the ball and went a bad direction (ala, Intel with the Itanium) and Nvidia capitalized on it. ATI couldn't quite keep up and I believe they still can't to this day.
Not that anything has improved since then.
The problem with this is that biology will likely end up dominated by China due to a willingness to conduct experiments that are otherwise non-viable in most countries.
Why the internet needs crawl neutrality
He even talked about it in his book Accidental Superpower nearly 10 years ago. His writings/videos have been instrumental in helping me to make some sense of what's going on in Ukraine
At least some aspects of this issue are getting better as we speak. The latest Mac OS (in beta) supports virtualizing ARM Linux but also enables the ARM Linux system to use Apple's speedy Rosetta 2 x86 binary compiler and JIT compiler to run x86 programs within the ARM Linux VM. Based on descriptions, it seems that the rest of the hypervisor VM framework has also matured substantially this release.

https://developer.apple.com/documentation/virtualization/run...

https://developers.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2022/10002/

If you are not familiar, Rosetta is how Apple Silicon Macs run existing Mac x86 binaries and it is highly performant. It does binary pre-compilation and cacheing. It also works with JIT systems. They are now making that available within Linux VMs running on Macs.
That's with no rider on the bike. Earlier in the video when he attempts to turn with the device that prevents countersteering, he falls off every time. It seems unlikely that 50M cyclists could easily do this but he could not.
Yeah, google search has really gone downhill lately. It’s hard to find quality results among all of the auto generated garbage.
That's the Hollywood view, you're getting that from a movie. Get it from the books, I recommend Richard Rhodes's The Making of the Atomic Bomb and The Turing Cathedral.
I bet Poland and the Baltics are thinking about a nuclear program.

Imagine this nightmare scenario that we just dodged: Trump in US, Corbyn in UK and Le Pen in France. And just like that, the nuclear shield against Russia is gone.
As doors got heavier it became necessary to add Petzold's windows programming with MFC book to the stack too, another massive (and great at the time) tome.
Are there any reliable information sources covering how the war is actually going?

On any given day you can read both that Russia is struggling and that Ukraine is ceding territory fast.
And Poland knows it. They've been furiously strong in their support of Ukraine, from huge gifts of soviet arms that Ukrainians can immediately use, to the humanitarian aid of literally opening their borders, no visa needed, to millions of Ukrainians trying to stay alive.

Poland loves the opportunity to bloody Russia, but they also love not being the ones to be bleeding for their sovereignty.

The rest of the world, at least the ones that stand to gain by weakening Russia, should absolutely follow in their footsteps.

Some idiots in the US have been crying that we've sent 1/3rd of our Stinger stocks to Ukraine, as if 1) the stinger is a desirable anti-aircraft platform and should be pushed as a mainstay of American defense, instead of an oldish system that could use a serious upgrade if we wanted it to be useful in a peer conflict, and 2) America actually relied on stingers at all, and didn't have the two largest air forces, designed specifically to murder peer adversary air forces.

Remember, as an American, your safety comes mostly from everyone being very far away. We could sent Ukraine our entire air force, and even though they wouldn't know how to use it, America would still have the largest air force in the world in our Navy! Anyone bitching about depleting our own defensive capability helping Ukraine is not arguing in good faith
it can sure do a lot of damage trying, such as if they attempted to steamroll the baltic nation states
I took a course like 10 years from Charles. He was amazing and I'm sure this book is just as amazing.
Sorry that’s just not true, government intervention can absolutely break the economy out of equity traps when a recession hits. If people are scared to lend/spend money it’s a self fulfilling prophecy, and can make things much worse
The article is a bit too chaotic for my taste. The speech is clearly a) for domestic consumption and b) I'd really like a reliable English transcript of the whole speech.

(Preferably without pictures: In the days of printed newspapers one could read at least some articles without seeing Putin's picture 100 times per day. It really gets annoying.)
I won't ask that because I'm already checked out debating the details. I'm more interested in the metadebate.

The amount of kettle logic that occurs in these types of discussions inevitably leads to that. I wish there was a way to talk about crypto holistically, but discussions about externalities get detoured into discussions about counter-examples, which get detoured into discussions about value, which get detoured into discussions about monetary policy. Every complaint is met with a just-so rebuttal that brings in a new dimension of justification. Cryptoskeptics end up being defeated by attrition. It's a fine way to cinch a debate rhetorically, but lousy at changing people's minds. I guess that's the rub, people just drop out which looks like a win. I wish cryptoenthusiasts saw how that happens. They could make better arguments.
That's fair. Most of it is hear say and anecdotal evidence. I know my company has increased salaries but that's one data point.

The only data I got from the top of my head is levels.fyi annual report. Numbers are all over the place but it shows a general upward trend. These numbers are from past years so they shouldn't account for the massive inflation of late.

Regarding opportunities, again this is mostly personal and anecdotal evidence. Due to Covid I worked remotely across the ocean for 2 years. Last year I got a top perf rating and I got my case for promo, despite being the only person in the whole org working 8 hours apart. I feel in EU there were more project with collaborations between people from different countries compared to pre-covid.

[1] https://www.levels.fyi/2019/

[2] https://www.levels.fyi/2020/

[3] https://www.levels.fyi/2021/
Well this sounds like really interesting observation. May I ask where exactly were the original closing tags located and how the stripped source looked like? I can imagine there _might_ be some differences among differently formatted code: e.g. I'd expect

<p>Content<p>Content[EOF fig1]

to be (slightly) slower, than

<p>Content</p><p>Content</p>[EOF fig2]

(most likely because of some "backtracking" when hitting `<p[>]`), or

<p>Content</p>
<p>Content</p>[EOF fig3]

(with that that small insignificant `\n` text node between paragraph nodes), what should be possibly faster than "the worst scenarios":

<p>Content
<p>Content[EOF fig4a]

or even

<p>
Content
<p>
Content
[EOF fig4b]

with paragraph text nodes `["Content\n","Content]"` / `["\nContent\n","\nContent\n]"`, where the "\n" must be also preserved in the DOM but due white-space collapsing rules not present in the render tree (if not overridden by some non-default CSS) but still with backtracking, that

<p>Content
</p>
<p>Content
</p>[EOF fig5]

should eliminate (again, similarly to fig2 vs fig1).

(Sorry for wildly biased guesswork, worthless without measurements.)
In fact, Sweden was so intent on dominating Russia that England intervened to ensure Russia would retain trade independence:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Stolbovo

> From the outset, Sweden had gone into the negotiations with very high ambitions and hopes of fulfilling the old dream of making all Russian trade pass through Swedish territory. As a consequence of that ambition, the Swedes originally demanded far-reaching territorial gains into western Russia, including the important northern port of Arkhangelsk.[3]

> However, King James I of England sent a delegation to mediate, and the United Provinces did the same, mostly to ensure that Arkhangelsk did not fall into Swedish hands, which would have made the extensive trade between Western Europe and Russia far more difficult.
PDF-XChange Editor, on Windows.

They’re really good, and the free version works very well for annotations and reading.

I only discovered this software because the company I work for adopted it as the pdf solution company wide.

Link: https://www.tracker-software.com/product/pdf-xchange-editor
So are the words of other countries.
As an avid git worktree user, I use multiple checkouts for the same repo all the time. It avoids a lot of context-switching pain.
This is very condescending, but I'm not even sure what you mean. Read more widely, because you believe this person has swallowed propaganda? Because OP pointed out the failed predictions of some people with poor understanding of word politics?
Activision-Blizzard's board get 350k. If they earned $0 instead, this would only give each employee an extra $35 per year. That's including their stock compensation.

As you say, most goes to investors. Which makes sense as they actually own the company.
> posting this publicly is also deeply unethical

No it's not. It's often the only recourse because of the certainty of retaliation because of the power imbalance.
Interestingly enough, I know MS (engineering) managers in other European satellite offices that make absolute bank. Easily 4-5 times more than comparable jobs at domestic companies.
This is because veganism is an extreme and the argument thus goes into 'meat' versus 'no animal product at all' (veganism).

In the West we probably eat too much meat (from a health perspective at least) so we should probably try to eat less of it, which can be as simple as not eating meat every day or at every meal. That's it, not very controversial and, yes, you can still eat 'proper' burgers when you go out.
Most wealthy couples with the means to afford designer babies would probably want heterosexual children. Gender would be left at their discretion.
Sucks you need 5.7 I guess. I have a native install of 8.0.29 on my Mac Mini for my gitea.
> Does the west actually believe that Russia has money or resources to expand? It can barely fight in Ukraine.

Doesn't seem to be stopping them. The problem with crazy is it will do things not in its self interest.
And why is there so much "capitalist interest" in bottling up everything into AI/ML constructs?

Because you don't have to pay them. They don't have feelings. They won't argue with you, and they don't have opinions.

Watch the collective losing of everyone's shit the first time something goes from somewhat quirky function simulator, to something that deigns to have a viewpoint seperate from the desired output.

Capitalism's core tenet is don't pay for anything you can possibly find a way not to (cost minimization).
Doesn't stop the legions of commenters who will join discussions like these to proudly assert that the US dollar is "backed by" the US economy, the US military, etc.
I didn't realize it wasn't already ARM. I found one day (https://stackoverflow.com/a/68929949) that running Simulator with Rosetta allows momentum scrolling to work, and everything else seemed perfect, so I left it that way.
Nuclear weapons are just the fastest way they can destroy the world.

They also have a huge amount of oil and natural gas and coal.

They also have plenty of brilliant people who are happy to work on a variety of projects where the outcome maybe a rapidly spreading drop tables computer virus or possibly even a rapidly spreading virus virus, certainly they've got a variety of boutique poisons for all occasions.

Having fewer resources than everyone else isn't a serious constraint if you're not constrained morally or legally, and vlad the underware poisoner isn't constrained by anything except possibly father time.
You're describing what was the CompSci option for an egineering degree when I went to Uni the first time. If you look at another great book for learning the "full picture", Nand to Tetris, Comp Sci is the second half of the book while Engineering seems to fill the space between physics and low-level software.
They seem more willing to play chicken with them.
There are! I've used the fomu and the tinyfpga, both with the open source stack.

(In the past I've tried running the commercial products under WINE, like most people did at the time, and it worked but was definitely terrible.)
I don't know what the correct definition is, but I will take the author's definition for the sake of argument:

>In this view, consciousness isn’t a mysterious ghost in the machine, but merely the word we use to describe what it’s “like” to model ourselves and others.

>When we model others who are modelling us in turn, we must carry out the procedure to higher orders: what do they think we think? What might they imagine a mutual friend thinks about me?

While I certainly buy that this sort of modeling is one effective way to be good at the language modeling task, I am unconvinced that it is the only way, and thus the fact that the networks are undeniably very good at the language modeling task does not necessarily imply they are doing so through consciousness (as defined above), or something on the road to consciousness.
Yeah, but not any economy, to be a nightmare requires a nightmarish economy.
In the West, we used to believe in individual liberty, which meant that there was no amount of meat that you should be able to tell me is enough or too much, because what I eat is not your business.
I use a combination of Brave + Blokada which seems to work well (I haven't seen an ad in over a year, I don't think). Turning off Blokada is horrifying.
Good news. We've found lambdas orchestrated with step functions and properly split out as to function can do a lot of data processing even with the limits you stated before needing to switch over to AWS batch or ECS. Nice to have that tool in the belt. I'll check it out.
It is difficult, but we try to travel when it gets bad. Traveling to the east, over the pass helps. Otherwise we fly somewhere.

Personally, I find the amount of violence and crime (all-time high for road rage shootings this year) is more demoralizing than the weather.
I suppose you can `.content { overflow-y: scroll }`.
"Tech world in shock after self-absorbed middle aged man speaks before thinking"
Cloudflare is a large part of this, they actively block all crawlers except for Google.