skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is not cash though. For example you'll never be able to buy food with it, or pay your rent with it. You can't store it under your mattress for 10 years because the servers they must talk to won't be around in 10 years.
Also, for a bunch of cases, you can use something akin to a multi-step ceasar cipher.

Yes, the obvious case of e.g. rot13 isn't exactly helpful security wise, but if you select e.g. 4, 22, 18 as the rotation order now you only need to be able to memorise -that- to get your passphrase back from an otherwise unmarked file lying around in the same (or other) storage.

Obviously, think hard about your threat model for that one, but if (as I keep procrastinating) I ever put backups of such stuff on something like rsync.net I'd give something akin to that approach serious consideration as being an acceptable trade-off overall.
I think you've now defined every kind of reasoning to be math.

I don't think that's a good way to define it. But if we do define it that way, then saying "x is math" becomes a very weak and much less interesting statement.
Yes, it's a (paraphrase from memory) of the first law of robotics. It's good that that's more in line with how the ai should be used, I suppose ;)

Ed: according to Wikipedia I got it pretty close:

> First Law

> A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.

> Second Law

> A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.

> Third Law

> A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Laws_of_Robotics

Just remember, Asimov himself pointed out through his works that the three laws are not enough! :)
I'm also unclear whether being cut is truly the only way to trigger the release. Could the note be damaged in other ways to get it to think it's been cut? The website is extremely light on details.
It would have been bad to standardize on USB-B and it will be good to standardize on USB-C. These aren't mutually exclusive statements.
I think it’s more of a quality thing. Apple makes great usb c cables as well which seem to last forever. While the cheap eBay crap wears out quickly.
Why ReactOS? Why not AmigaOS? Why not any other OS?

The OP wants to boot Windows on an M1. That's why.
I'm surprised how few cars this is in total. It's kind of cool the brand has such a big impact with only low thousands of cars.
> What's next, regulating where I can spend my money and where I can't?

This is already a thing. See drugs, slaves etc.
Dead butterflies look really nice though.
That's not an accurate description of BTC maximalism.

Usually a BTC maximalist means that within the context of crypto, they are BTC only and aggressively and passionately reject every other crypto token. This is what you call call a common maximalist stance.

Out of that group, a small minority is a believer in "hyperbitcoinization". This is an event where BTC becomes the dominant asset class, at the expense of gold, bonds, etc, with a market cap prediction for BTC ranging from 10-100T.

Even people with that (unlikely) hope, do not claim any currency replacement, only an asset shift.
Aria attributes can be difficult, because of bad parsers in accessibility software.

You need to set the attribute, and often do so without a corresponding value.

That is, how do you do: `<element aria-someattr>`.

Because the bad parser won't acknowledge something like: `<element aria-someattr='true'>`. That'll be ignored.
Compared to CCS, Tesla made a ton of smart decisions with their charging setup:

- All Teslas have their charging ports at the rear left side. This means that charging cables can be very short. Longer cables would cause tangles, cost more, and be harder to cool.

- Tesla's protocol has built-in payment. You plug in and charge. With CCS it varies. Sometimes you use a credit card. Sometimes you download a mobile app and sign up for some account. Sometimes the planets align and CCS's plug-and-charge works.

- The CCS plug is much bigger. If you look at the connector sizes[1] or adapters[2], the CSS plug is comically huge. Tesla had to redesign the tail lights on the Model S/X to fit CCS Combo 2 ports.

- Every exposed contact is a potential failure point, and CCS exposes more contacts than Tesla's charging port.

- CCS has two different plug dimensions which are used in different regions, so a European CCS vehicle brought to North America will need an adapter (and vice-versa).

- If your vehicle only supports AC charging, you cannot charge with CCS Combo plugs. They won't fit. Since some Teslas were made before the CCS Combo standard took off, older Model S/X's used a CCS Type 2 port. So now every Supercharger in Europe has two plugs: CCS Type 2 & Combo 2.[3]

1. https://teslatap.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/connector_co...

2. https://www.notateslaapp.com/images/news/2021/ccs-adapter.jp...

3. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eu-tesla-supercharge...
That's just a joke I'm too stupid to get right?

You make a physical representation of something digital which also changed denomination quite often the last 10 years?

What do I do with it?

I mean first of I need to check if the value is on that note so I need a smartphone. Now I have a smartphone why do I need a note?

The only useful thing would be if I as the giver don't have a smartphone but than I also need to give away a printed object. How cheap can someone print something like this?

Now Bitcoin makes even more garbage?!
Somewhat reminds of FloppyFW, which I used back in the day on a huge 486 to protect my home network. https://www.zelow.no/floppyfw/
Pitch Deck Review
Not just that, but Bitcoin acceptance is already pretty thin. There would be a subset of people who accept bitcoin who would accept this in person. I see this only being used to buy beer at Bitcoin meetups.

That said if they can find an initial group of super enthusiasts it might go well. Maybe Nayib Bukele would be interested in the technology to license it to El Salvador.
F# has some nice things in it: I especially like how it handles multiple return values. But compared to the language it is most clearly decended from, OCaml, it ties you to .NET Core and it lacks an ML-like module system and macros.

If you want to use .NET, F# is a fine choice. But otherwise, and especially in the context of an alternative to Rust, I recommend OCaml.
The only difference I notice is in the white which seems to have more protein from the cage free eggs. It's usually not too noticeable to me except with hard and soft boiled eggs where the egg white just seems more dense/thicker. I use these for my soft boiled marinated eggs so there's more white to absorb my marinate goodness.
> It's not a failure of the spec, it's a failure to adhere to the spec.

Which means 1 spec is not sufficient for interoperability
Only if Poland were the one doing the punishing. In this context, if I am correctly interpreting what the OP is referring to, the EU is punishing its member state Poland; Poland is the recipient of the punishment
You don't seem to understand how modern markets work. See for example Coca-cola. Anyone can create a drink that looks like Coca-cola. However, we know it has a near monopoly on that segment of the market. Just because a product can be manufactured, doesn't mean that companies have the capacity to create and produce it at the scale needed to become profitable.
> Sutton's "Bitter Lesson"

The page from Sutton makes a statement that it is an error to implement imitations of human mind, especially hardcoding in models of it. The implementation of Intelligence is not an imitation of human mind, nor it needs hardcoding in simplified models.

> problem solvers, not parrots

They may solve language based tasks, yet Intelligence is a different matter. Parroting was used here in the sense of "repeating acritically inputs", not in the sense you used it.

> invented by an anti language model activist

And others, as you can see from this case, coincidentally decided for that term independently and unaware that others used it (as is normal). Probably driven to that having seen somebody call "intelligence" what is described as a system of consolidated associations - and noting that Intelligence is the opposite.
I think this ignores the fact that an agent can be meaningfully embodied in the internet, using APIs for sensors and actuators. OpenAI's training of large language models with reinforcement learning, recent retrieval augmented models and "chain of thought" reasoning are all meaningful steps in this direction in my opinion.
Many countries still have conscripted forces, at least on paper. Others have "armed militias" during times of relative peace. Robust institutions may also hold out better than Rome of ~100BC.

But I do hold the concern you hint at, and with an increasing tendency towards fewer, more expensive and soon maybe automated weapons platforms, the risk may increase of some kind of move towards some alternative system. (Monarchy, Aristocracy, Oligarchy, Theocracy, Autocracy, etc)

Which is why I (who used to be too liberterian to like the idea of a forced draft) now support a system based on the draft, simply because of the stability it provides.

But if and when the most effective type of military once again becomes wieldable by a small minority, it will become harder and harder to prevent a shift.
OTOH, there are vast regions of Iberia that are unpopulated. Where migrantes may be more welcome!

EG 70% of Spain is Empty: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pL8XPZp4-5c
> I’d love to see how you accomplish this. It seems tricky to be able to sign the replacement transaction without revealing the encrypted private key either to yourselves, or to the mobile app. I guess that you could have the app send the encrypted key up to your servers, where it could be decrypted locally for use and then discarded. But if you are going to do that every time the note changes hands, why not just hold onto the private key? Why mess with encryption keys?

I had to dig back into the architecture on this part since most of this was written last year waiting on notes. In this case you are correct -- we need to decrypt the key in RAM, use it to generate the new tx along with the new user pub key and send that back for the user to broadcast.

Again, the distinction here is that we don't store it which, to your point may or may not matter from a regulatory perspective. I would agree that it would be hand waving and, indeed, false if we claimed that we never could store it at this point (or prior, at the time of creation).
I have an idea. Tie housing construction goals to incoming migration numbers. If 10,000 people move to a city in a year, the city must permit 10,000 new housing starts. No room to meet your city’s goal? Rezone that empty lot that’s zoned for hotel. (I know you have one, every city does).

Permit is a funny word because it means both the piece of paper that allows a developer to build and also “to grant permission” the city has the power to grant or withhold permission to build. And to be perfectly frank the default position is withhold. But we have the power to change that.
We can simply demand it of our elected officials.

We should welcome people who want to move in (because economic success depends on it but also because it’s friendly and healthy) but we can also make a plan so they don’t squeeze out the locals. I know Silicon Valley utterly failed to do that. Maybe other places could learn from their abject failure.
Ah hah... Well... I have no intuition for what might succeed in the cryptocurrency space.

With Sandstorm we did plan to have paid apps and in-app purchases eventually, believe it or not...
Lightning isn't as fast as USB 3.0 (which USB C cables should support), and can't supply as much power as USB-PD (which, again, works over USB C cables)
Cool stuff on there, Yury!
http://archive.today/fkheo
There are other problems with the theory too, they probably weren't solved perfectly by whatever SUSY model your supervisor was working on so they got less attention.

But ultimately, yes. The entirety of modern physics is largely borne out of the unwillingness to accept the the world is simply as it appears and that there's no deeper unifying principles.
Hmm, I guess you must mean that the native Windows development environment (i.e. .NET/Windows App SDK) isn't very developer friendly; I'm afraid I don't have any idea or how to compare it to Swift or Cocoa. As a user, though, I have better access to software and tools than ever before!
When in history has interoperability not been a catalyst for innovation?

Most of it, including most of the history of computers.

Competition almost always breeds innovation. It's basic economics, and why people get upset by monopolies and such.
I think a philosophical comparison is the allegory of the cave. Could an image generation model, trained sufficiently, demonstrate an understanding of human anatomy as comprehensive as a human surgeon simply via extrapolating from pictures of bodies? They are seeing the "shadow" of the human body and its physical reality via a 2D image, can replicate it based on what they see it do and not do, but at what point is their visual replication indistinguishable from genuine physical understanding? Is there a certain point when the difference is irrelevant, as the shadows provide all the information they need? Or are there limits to extrapolation given the lack of restraints (i.e. a dataset includes manipulated images, low resolution vs high, etc not labeled properly)
> I don't see why "What about innovation?" is taken seriously as an argument anyway.

because the USB-IF historically has struggled to reach enough consensus from its stakeholders to allow innovation to take place. The entire reason that lightning exists in the first place is because USB-IF couldn't agree on a replacement for micro-B (which everyone agreed clearly needed improvement!) and one of the members just had to shrug and go do it themselves. Once one of the members had gone there and proven the concept, it lit a fire under the asses of the rest of the consortium.

Same for why thunderbolt exists as a standard and not as USB 4 in the first place... not enough consensus to go there as an official standard rather than an extension. It took what, 10 years after Thunderbolt was standardized before we finally pulled ourselves out of the fecal lagoon of USB 3.x standards?

And then you layer in the dysfunction from the members that are primarily interested in creating consumer confusion with the USB 3.0, USB3.1 Type-1, USB 3.1 Type-2, USB 3.2 Type-1, USB 3.2 Type-2, USB 3.2 Type-2x2 nonsense so that they can deceptively and maliciously sell yesterday's hardware with tomorrow's standard on the box... many of the members of USB-IF are interested in actively stalling progress if it means they save 30 cents on their BOM.

This is not an organization with consumer interests at heart. They are a bad choice to be the legal guardian (more like, conservator) of all innovation.
you're saying someone manufactured 137GB of conversations in order to scam people out of _?
I recently tried to get into Haskell, while also looking for relevant projects written in it on Github and couldn't find anything "interesting" (this may vary from person to person, obviously).

I was watching a YouTube playlist but I'd rather read something like "Haskell by example", or some sort of small apps with comments to understand how it works.

I was interested in writing some binary parser in it but I failed miserably.
Back when my parents were still in the land of the living, I would've been entirely comfortable believing that the odds of them failing at that would've been low enough that (odds of that failing * odds of my needing that data) would've been stupidly low - low enough I'd've accepted the risk and stopped worrying about it on the basis the likelihood of a problem at that point was significantly lower than many other at least as awful problems and I should focus on mitigating those instead.
Perhaps I misunderstood this email from my installer, but it says:

"Please remember that in order to be compliant with your solar warranty or any guarantees, you must check up your system's monitoring at least once every 30 days and immediately let us know if you have any issues."

This was from Your Energy Solutions here in the SF bay area. Are they misrepresenting your warranty conditions?
Was with this until a very strange swerve towards a criticism of Volodymir Zelensky and the war in Ukraine.

A reference to TopGun:Maverick being promoted at Cannes where Zelensky gave a speech is followed by this quote:

“On The World Socialist Website, Stefan Steinberg responded:

‘The Ukrainian president’s duplicitous speech was then given a standing ovation by the well-heeled audience of film celebrities, super-models, media figures and critics gathered at the festival’s Grand Théâtre Lumière…

‘Zelensky, whose government’s promotion of unfettered free market capitalism and extreme nationalism includes full support for the notorious fascist Azov battalion, and his US-NATO backers stand for everything that Chaplin abhorred. In fact, what would a Chaplin make out of the self-satisfied rubbish about “poor, defenseless little Ukraine,” armed to the hilt and financed by the biggest imperialist robbers on the planet?’ “

And then back to Top Gun discussion as if that had anything to do with anything. ¯\_(ಠ_ಠ)_/¯
Your physical note itself expire 2029?

What? Why?
https://joakim.uddholm.com/

I mostly post for my own sake, different instructions I want to remember and such. There's the odd infosec post in there, but typically niche things you haven't heard about.
Exposing these tools to broader use will accelerate the development of mitigations, which is a net win for regular users IMHO.
The post I responded to used target being overstocked as a sign of things returning to normal.

Presumably, this was asb opposed to shortages; Target being overstocked is not normal, and is in fact a sign that things are not normal- rather, a sign that supply lines still aren't lining up with demand, but with different causes now than last year.

Odds are we won't see 2020 prices again on many goods, so inflation slowing is the best we can hope for (and better than rising inflation, of course). It is going to take awhile for a new normal to stabilize, though.
> As for "erosion of freedom in the last 10 years in China ... the Chinese people don't view it that way

Really? My girlfriend and her friends would strongly disagree with that statement. From my understanding they grew up in a time when internet in China was a lot younger and they actually had an ability to discuss political discussions, or items that highlight the government in a negative manner.

Now everything that isn't the government's view is incredibly censored/filtered online. It might hard to not see the erosion of freedom when it's being prevented from being communicated online.

Fwiw I'm not disagreeing with your statement on economic freedom and I find the amount of people lifted out of poverty and the growth China has gone through in the last few decades to be incredible but it seems a bit disingenuous to say certain "freedoms" haven't been eroded in the last 10 years comparatively.
> Automatically tagging files with information that might be personally identifiable (bought media from retailer X on date Y) is also the sort of thing that turns off users in a hurry.

At least the iTunes store actually does that.
It's interesting, but it seems like it relies on technology a bit too much to really be a cash equivalent. Particularly the centralized server required.
The European descendants are less poor.
The mushrooms in the figure masked as some ungulate are the hands, maybe shaped like hoofs, or any other ornament. The people "levitating high" are clearly swimming in an age when Sahara was covered with lakes.

I don't see anything suggesting mushroom use in the pictures, I see another victim of publish (anything) or perish. But people will see what they want to see, of course.

And to prove it wouldn't be difficult. If you paint something in presence of fungi, the spores will be everywhere and fuse with the paint. Each spore has a different shape and size, so you could even guess the family or genus.

No spores or spores of other species? don't make us lose our time.

Spores over the painting? recent times. The images would represent any other thing.

But if they find ancient spores under the layers of painting, (or traces of it as bubbles in the pigment), and are of the shape and size correct, the theory would start having any support at least.

In the giant I see a foetus dead, with a small figure next that has a suspiciously round belly.
Physics is (or should be) regarded enviably by other disciplines. They keep managing to get these crazily expensive multinational projects funded: LHC, ITER, various space telescopes... multi-billion projects. I honestly cannot recall an official scientific experiment or tool in another discipline funded for even only 100 million. Just imagine that level of funding for your favourite discipline.

The direct scientific value may be limited; the spinoff of that much attention / funding isn't.

Not saying we should definitely fund a new collider. But the amount of effort needed is so huge, that even just the discussion will have positive impact for science.
Three reasons why this is probably irrelevant.

1.

> Von NotHaus designed the Liberty Dollar currency in 1998 and the Liberty coins were marked with the dollar sign ($); the words dollar, USA, Liberty, Trust in God (instead of In God We Trust)

So that is not a great example, as it is currency designed to confuse people into thinking they are real dollars.

2.

The USA is just one set of laws. Over the pond in the UK, it is fine.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_community_currencies_i...

3.

This isn't a new currency, it is a new key storage format for Bitcoin.
Awesome work, I'd love to be able to dual boot Windows on my M1 machine

Hopefully Microsoft just hires you and gives you the resources you need to do this properly
A friend of mine relocated his tech company there. It’s going great. He employs locals, farms them out to US clients at a more favorable rate, guarantees outcomes, lives well. I should look him up and go visit.
thanks! that kind of does make sense!
I'm still questioning the real benefit compared to the downsides of it.

Ordering food online vs. Terrawatts of energy wasted, Asics hardware and GPU prices and the created co2 of all of that.

Mmhhh difficult very difficult
As someone coming from a different ethical background I think your comment is complete inline with what would irritates me regarding the case (without considering the legal outcome). Putting an unborn on the same level as a child and to even blame anyone for triggering gun use while being unarmed themselves seems totally outside my reality.

It should be taken into account the article is not from US media. Typically in Europe it would probably not be considered misleading for the aforementioned reasons.