skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I am talking spesifically about email - with namecheap you can literally show them your ID document, they have your phone number on file and they can call you. They have to help you access the service you paid for, otherwise you have grounds for a lawsuit.

I have not tried this with microsoft, but ai imagine it should be similar.

There is nothing special about Gmail, why do you have to use it?

I had this warning 14 years ago when a friend's gmail was stolen and their support (back when they had it) refused to lift a finger despite him selding a scan of his ID, etc. I am never using free service for something vital again.
The only comment I could see in the article on that topic is this:

> the EU simply said that "consumers will be provided with clear information on the charging characteristics of new devices, making it easier for them to see whether their existing chargers are compatible.

Which is super disappointing, as the person who wrote TFA clearly didn't read anything other than the press release. The actual supporting documentation is here [0] and says:

> on the packaging or a label, manufacturers would have to
provide information on specifications relating to charging capabilities, in line with annex Ia (amended Article 10(8) RED). This includes a description of the wired chargers' power requirements (the text displayed should read: 'The minimum power delivered by charger shall be equal or higher than [xx] watts') and specifications on charging capabilities ('USB PD fast charging' and an indication of any other supported charging protocols).

Which is still not great - this doesn't cover cables for example, and it doesn't guarantee that it will be printed on the device. Here [1] are apples chargers in the UK - unless they're side by side it's impossible to tell which one of those chargers is which, and even at that unless you know for sure one of the devices is X, its' really quite difficult to tell.

[0] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BR...
[1] https://www.apple.com/uk/shop/accessories/all/made-by-apple?...
Right, the automakers' finance divisions make money by selling cars, not loans. If you can get a loan under the prime rate, it's definitely subsidized.
Telegram has a great thing working in its favor: it is mostly free of censorship, particularly of the kind that reacts to Western do-gooder sensibilities. I have learnt more about the Ukraine war from Telegram channels (Gruz 200, Truha, some local ones) than from all of the Western press combined. Analysts like Bellingcat, CIT and ISW keep citing Telegram channels as sources. Both DNR/LNR "separatists" and Ukrainian regular and irregular fighters are putting out a lot of unfiltered info on TG.

The idea that Telegram is in any way safer than the other platforms, I really don't see much to speak for it.

It's similar to ProtonMail: you get it as a backup in case you get locked out of your googlemail; you don't get it to conspire.
> If a ship is capable of continuous 1g acceleration then it shouldn't be designed with rotating centrifugal rings for gravity.

OP talks about accelerating at 0.1g on the outbound trip, and this is an emergency situation - maybe this ship isn't capable of continuous 1g acceleration without straining the engines past their operational parameters.

Although I can't imagine a ship with rotation ring segments built to withstand a year of 0.1g acceleration not immediately coming apart when suddenly subjected to a 4g load.

I don't think _my house_ would withstand a 4g load, and it was designed (and has successfully withstood) over a hundred years of a 1g load.
> How does one do that?

Go to https://archive.org/web/ scroll to the bottom where it says “save page now”. Enter URL and click “save page” button.

I have not found a way to enter multiple URLs or tell the archive to crawl an entire domain/site. If you figure that out, please let me know.
I don't see how this is relevant -- this is a statement of principle. The fact remains that to update the standard, the "timely adjustment" would be made by the legislative body. Don't let the passive voice fool you here; this is not some dynamic industry-led process, it's just a non-binding commitment to update the regulations if the technology advances.
Does it really matter which country is the headquarters for the corporate owner? It's still a German plant hiring Germans and subject to German laws. The rule of law exists in both Germany and the US. German citizens can invest in Intel.

And, in the event of a US/German war, that plant is and will remain German, not American.

I think there's an excellent case for distinguishing that from companies from China, where non-Chinese citizens have a great risk of confiscation of their assets by investing, Chinese companies are subject to a lot of other rules even when operating outside China, etc.
I get past this by writing down by usernames/passwords in a physical book. Of course, this wouldn't help me if I lost the book.
And… so you identify Talent Cooling in your org, what do you do about it? I feel like this is half an article.
They said they sent the email via Shopify. Are you saying Shopify doesn’t have good deliverability?
> The origin of the company is irrelevant if they respect basic norms.

This is not correct. American govenment has a habit of using American companies to push foreign policy objectives.
It's _very_ difficult to hire "up" in talent. Organizations _tend_ to hire slightly less talented people then they already have. Keeping top talent around and using them to attract more top talent is key. Once you lose top talent, the likelihood of you bringing in someone to help bootstrap things again is pretty low.
We're basically just arguing semantics at this point. You define art/artist differently than I do. We won't make further progress with this discussion, but regardless it's great to see that technology is coming so far
https://joearms.github.io/index.html#Index
If you have healthy kids, they become mostly independent at age 4-5. You may want to consider a 5 year plan in Germany, or even a 3 year plan, and then reassess. It doesn’t have to be a one way door.

You’ll have plenty of time to accumulate wealth beyond the next 5 years. And you’ll still accumulate some even in Germany.
Why not just use a password manager, store the emergency recovery kit in Dropbox or at a public url (encrypt the kit with a password you know)?
Yeah i stopped using authy the first time a token was automatically seeded this way (may have been another way, but it was automatic and I didn't like it because I was also using the seed on my Pebble which i could then no longer do with this method). i prefer manual control over stuff like that and definitely don't want it assuming some magic is okay.
I wouldn't expect to find much business or government chatter on Telegram; it doesn't hold much trust with government adjacent security personnel.

Moreover, it sounds like they claim to have targeted specific people and groups; the boring truth may just be that it didn't occur to them to look for anything else.
This is a kind of adverse selection.
All doom and gloom. Having experienced some very good treatments and excellent outcomes for my daughter, I have a different opinion than "the system is without pros".
To circumvent the impact of the regulations
A.k.a. the dead sea effect: http://brucefwebster.com/2008/04/11/the-wetware-crisis-the-d...
Tickets #1452, #1454, #1588. Was told "the account has been removed" on March 22nd, but I continue to receive "Last week on FireHydrant" emails specific to our org, most recently on May 29.
Russia is not going to invade Germany. Stop spreading nonsense.
Question is how would it adapt, which is a fair question to ask and answer
personally I think the literature and academia contain great treasures that are ignored.

but your argument that the academy is center of knowledge about the pragmatics of software development falls a bit flat. if you've been around enough you know 'grad student code' when you see it.
I believe those are just shitty implementations of the spec. If you buy high quality gear with high quality specs, it should work ok.

The Nintendo switch is a pile of shit though.
First of all, the proposed design is estimated to cost 21 billion EUR.

Secondly condensed matter and quantum information already get plenty of money: superconductivity alone is a market worth around 5 billion dollars, google is spending billions of its own money into quantum computers.

But sure, lets give these starving fields that produce commercial products a some tax-payer dollars at the slight cost of completely de funding high energy physics, I'm sure that will get the scientist there to care about the proton despite them very consciously choosing to do something else.
It’s all interconnected, Intel fabs are worthless without ASML, you can think of Intel as almost like a general contractor at this point pulling capabilities from everywhere.
Axon Pauses Plans for Taser Drone as Ethics Board Members Resign
I see. That's a single point of failure, introduced by yourself. Might be good for some, bad for others.
You can invest 5.5 billion to create local companies, instead of subsidizing an American one.
Not a particle physicist, but I think the entire history of human scientific discovery is set again that proposition. Namely: (1) that we have a fundamental theory that describes the Universe; (2) that it is within our technical capability to experimentally verify the reality of that theory; and (3) we choose not to do so.

It's easy to monday-morning quarterback a result that was successful and unexciting, but imagine how intolerable the world would be if we'd chosen not to verify it.
> Do you ever have a set of facts and reason about what you can conclude from them? That's math.

> Do you ever play board games and try to come up with the best strategy? That's math.

If zero people who aren't math majors think that's true—which is the case—then our 13 years of compulsory math education is to blame for that.

If people manage to do both well enough to get by just fine in life, without any formal math education on it, then one wonders how necessary math education is to effectively do the math that people actually do.

(personally, I'd look in the philosophy section for the former, at least, seeing as all my logic books, except the one specifically about mathematical proofs, are philosophy textbooks, including the ones full of symbols)
I don’t think it’s really about the clothes being uncomfortable, but just the idea of being forced to wear certain kinds of clothes
This is a really neat technology, but I don't understand it's use case. I've worked in HealthTech and currently in the compliance space. I'm skeptical of Mongo's claims (and their familiarity with compliance laws). Kind of feels like a solution in search of a problem.

"In use" implies that you have a need to process that data. It doesn't matter if the end client is submitting queries in plain text (protected in transit) or this fancy encryption, the client (or server) still needs to be authorized to query that data. Translating from plain-text to encryption does not add additional protections from a compliance perspective.
I don't see them claiming the same happened to Microsoft, Yahoo or other email providers and I know for a fact that all of that stuff has happened to me from mail servers that seemed to be configured just fine.
Maybe not for emacs?

You can have buffers that are views of many different things: directories, shells, REPLs, email boxes, etc. People might not know what a buffer is, but I think they'd be surprised to see those "in" a document, which might be worse.
Holy crap. That's amazingly evil. And not at all what I thought you were going to say
> I’m not a super techy person (dentist) but I like the articles and discussions here.

I was going to ask a bit more about this then checked your comments and found you had answered someone else on this already! [1]

Do you happen to know any other niche online forums (eg non-tech ones) that have a lot of interesting discussions? Other than HN the only things I really use are Twitter and a few subreddits.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28811924
https://archive.ph/8vrZj
I think this is the type of writing that I like the least. Someone trying to come up with another smart theory on Why Things Are Bad and Why Other People Are Mediocre (with the implication that he is not), with no supporting evidence and very little career experience to back up the observations made
If this is true, then remote workers are also not a 1:1 replacement for in-office staff.
Hey folks. Co-founder of incident.io here.

Firstly, thanks for the kind words Quentin – appreciate it, and congrats on your progress so far.

incident.io is pitched slightly differently to Rootly, insomuch as we're not building an engineering product, but instead something that's designed to work for entire organisations. I saw first hand what this looks like at Monzo – a bank here in the UK – where incidents weren't just declared when Cassandra fell over (ahem, https://monzo.com/blog/2019/09/08/why-monzo-wasnt-working-on...), but were also declared for things like excessive customer support queries and not enough people to serve them, regulatory issues, or a customer threatening staff in reception. All of these things require teams to form quickly, communicate well, and follow a process. We're building for this.

In terms of market and customer segments, we're working with a wide range of companies with up to 6k employees. That said, we're a perfect fit right now for folks in the 200-1500 people range.

By all means reach out if you have any questions.
All cars…
Vec and allocators aren’t usually used for embedded rust since the std library can be disabled. (Though the _core_ library is still accessible)
If you want a shipping culture then encourage, praise, and promote people who actually ship features. If this is a new mindset shift, you will have some crabby people who complain about supposed corners being cut, red tape not worshipped properly, and all manner of reasons why the features being shipped are bad. You should listen to the concerns but redirect them to work on automating such corners and red tape and make them see that those getting promoted are actually shipping features and improving the system rather than complaining.

Especially in micro services environments the number of commits do not reflect genuine work. Someone can push a boilerplate change every day to one of the 17 repos required to ship and make it seem like they are working when in reality it’s just bureaucracy. Change everything to focus on ease of shipping high quality features and eliminate excuses as to why that can’t be happening.
I was unable to find any record of legislation forcing standardization of gas pump form factors. Also, in my experience different pumps operate at different rates. I think the fact that pumps tend to be quite similar is a result of their mechanical nature, where less precision is required.
Introduction to Rust generics (2/2): Trait Objects – Static vs. Dynamic dispatch
Not the OP, but in one of the smaller companies (~30 people/~12 engineers) you describe that's currently looking for a tool like this.

I can't actually see the pricing because it's behind a nebulous "contact us" link, but if this is more than about $5/user/month I would definitely balk at the price.

Larger companies already have dedicated platform and tooling teams with enough technical talent and bandwidth to build this sort of solution (I've seen something eerily similar to this at a previous employer that had about ~75 engineers). IMHO it's the small companies that need off the shelf incident management because they have very few people to dedicate to solving this problem and need a way to manage the communication chaos that incidents can cause.
I think that's crazy reductive though. It's not an either/or, and it's a gross oversimplification that big projects only show benefit within their major focus. LHC has produced benefit in particle physics, yes, but I am 100% sure it also introduced new methods of construction, semiconductors, material science, and other fields in the construction of the facility. I see this argument with space exploration as well, "why not feed the world instead of exploring space?"

Why is it zero sum to begin with? And more importantly, how less effective would be able to feed the world had we had no space race to begin with? If we were still at a 1950s technical level, our farming capacity would be exponentially lower, and most of the big leaps came as a direct result technologies originally developed for space.

It's naive to assume we can see all the benefits of daring to attempt hard things, but attempting hard things is what moves society forward. If all we did was lots of little cars in all directions when we have already figured out the challenges with little cars, mean the ONLY benefit is the direct one. If we've never built a car to explore REALLY far, well, there's a bunch of other problems we need to solve to get there. And honestly, it's those results that will likely move the needle.
I believe everyone would disable (even those who insist in sending voice messages) and the feature would die.
At the highest highest levels you need genetics and great training. And it also depends on the sport. Super popular sports like basketball and football require both. Niche sports like fencing, you could probably play at a pretty high level with either.

But to play HS sports for example at most schools, either will do the job. And for most people playing the sport they love in high school will be worth it. Even among pro players, their HS experience is often their best experience.
I can't say I've ever run into this, but it sounds like you have. You might find there's a common pattern which distinguishes this mistake from typical scenarios where you did something else wrong and the compiler can use that to provide more helpful errors in this case.

Seems like, we do for x in Result-or-Option<T> and T is IntoIterator, and then we treat x as if it is the thing T was an iterator for, rather than T. That's detectable.

So, worth taking some examples of code where you did this, and writing up a report that the compilers team can look at. If you've got some idea what you're doing you might well even find Rust's error reporting code readable enough to dive in and try some fixes yourself.
Why do you care about the origin of the company?
This boggles my mind for a different reason. I can't understand why would they design the lock to be so shitty. They're saving probably a miniscule amount of money required to upgrade the lock's design to "barely decent" in exchange risking lawsuits and reputational damage. I really don't get it. The amount they save cannot possibly justify the product being such a clusterfuck.
Tinqwise.com | Backend developer | Hilversum / Greater Amsterdam Area, Netherlands | Europe

I'm Okke, head of engineering at TinQwise. TinQwise builds a learning experience platform - think online learning. We work on improving culture and driving user-centric learning for some of the world’s biggest brands, including Tommy Hilfiger, Calvin Klein, PICNIC, IKEA, Catawiki, Sani-Ikos, Randstad, Takeaway.com, G-star, Hunkemöller, Rituals and many others.

I am looking for python developers to help us scale.

While some members of our team are remote, we prefer to work together in the office one or two days a week.

You must be eligible to work in the Netherlands, as unfortunately, we can't sponsor visas at this time.

https://tinqwise.nl/vacatures/medior-back-end-python-django-...

Feel free to email me directly if you have any questions: okke.formsma@tinqwise.com
>Crypto has its uses.

No, this is wrong. By itself it has no uses besides speculative gambling. The technology fundamentally doesn't enable anything else, if you take that out it's just a really niche and inefficient distributed database. You may be suggesting that some companies have been able to build useful things on top of a blockchain. That might be true but out of all the examples you gave, they're useful in spite of cryptocurrency, not because of it. The exercise for crypto builders now becomes how to separate the useful parts from the ponzi tokens and build just those.
While they appear not sure about you, I would definitely be sure of them. They playing two candidates off against one another, or they're paralyzed by indecision. Time to bail.
> There is nothing special about Gmail, why do you have to use it?

I'm terrified of Google's support, but:

- It's free.

- I've been using Gmail for over a decade. Why would I switch? I've tons of data in there, and most people I care about know this is my email.

> they have your phone number on file and they can call you

Do you mean the phone I just lost in the fire? (in this scenario)
I can't count how many articles about X company or investor is addressing this issue and I don't think anyone has solved it.

I can't find any magic numbers here that explains how the proposal here to replace the "middleman" lowers prices ... by just being another middleman...
Google images?

I mistook the initial "imagine" but read to the end to see it was hypothetical. That said the passport burning set off alarms in my head. The rest was within reason, even the house on fire (thought the non-lightning-proof fire safe sounded fishy) but he had time to take a picture of his passport while it was on fire and he didn't try to put it out? Unrealistic.

I guess I should have been skeptical of /any/ pictures for that matter, especially the house since "how would he take the picture if his phone was fried".
No, you're misunderstanding. The front panel is validating that the factory code is entered correctly before it allows the lock code to be reset. If the front panel were just dumb I/O, the inside panel would have to validate the factory code before allowing the lock code to be reset.
Religion is a contemplation of free will, not sure if contemplating that is like being on acid :)
Oh and if you're not in the market to buy something, I open sourced the tool I originally wrote at Monzo: https://github.com/monzo/response
I see this as more about fundamental trust.. confidentiality from the service providers, not compliance
Intel spent tens of billions on stock buybacks and now they're getting subsidies to build fabs.

Why does the middle class taxpayer have to bail everyone out, with lower living standards due to taxation and inflation.
My estimates are in the 1-5% range of US adults for those added together, but sure:

That non-exhaustive list of my personal experience only covers a few percent of the adult population.

How many people do you believe use any particular skill?

- - - - -

Fun aside: according to the BLS, around 1% of working adults are software developers. (A little over, actually.)

https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/work.pdf

https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/...
I have been brought in many times as a senior person to right a troubled ship. I can't think of a case where its turned out well...I'm hardly perfect - but its very easy for the existing team to decide you're a weird pain in the ass, and very difficult to 'reach down' in a friendly and constructive way and slowly tease them into acting like a functional team.