skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If you haven't practiced leetcode your chances are slim to none, even if you are a good programmer. 1 month full time study could be enough, but even then there's still an element of luck involved. They are looking for specific things in the interviews so if you haven't prepared well unfortunately the chances are very low.

You could take the interview for experience but you could get a similar experience on a tech interview matching service without triggering a cooldown at a big company, or a "no hire" in your history. Good luck
So many hobbies are expensive. I know I'm not competing with mass-produced pieces. It's like never dining in a nice restaurant because there are so many fast-food chains out there.
if you use the browser extension and turn autofill on it applies to Bitwarden as well. If you use the desktop version or an alternative like Keepass, which Tavis suggests, it's not an issue.
Is Cranelift basically a LLVM but in Rust?
Market is not always rational. Also it could take years and years for the deal to go through. It would require Twitter to sue musk and everyone to come to some kind of settlement. That settlement would likely be less than the price but not much less. Maybe a few percent less.

It is also Musk. People know he's insane so that is an additional hit to the price. They know he'll do anything to get out of the deal. Doesn't mean he will.
You can't do bot detection with just the tweet text.

Tweets come with a lot more data than that.

Tweet object model: https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs/twitter-api/data-dicti...

Example payloads: https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs/twitter-api/data-dicti...
The issue isn't bankruptcy, it's that Elon has funded his billionaire lifestyle by mortgaging his Tesla stock, and may face one or more margin calls depending on (a) whether Tesla stock falls below $625/share and (b) how much Tesla stock he is required to pledge as collateral or liquidate to finance his personal portion of the purchase price.

Additionally, as CEO of Tesla there are limitations on his ability to pledge his shares of Tesla stock. It's unlikely that he's anywhere close to that threshold, but that is something he needs to watch for.

Also, Musk cannot pledge or sell his SpaceX shares without prior government approval, as doing so would violate a number of requirements related to SpaceX's government contracts.
> The amount that Nintendo "lost" is probably a couple orders of magnitude less than the damages that Nintendo claims.

That seems unlikely. The group made millions of dollars over the years which would probably make it at most a single order of magnitude overestimate.

That said, I am not a big fan of copyright or the DMCA provisons that this conviction was obtained for.
Somewhat Contra Marcus on AI Scaling
Saved from Annihilation – Newburyport, MA
Themselves? This is about their cars being a threat to everyone around them.

>so much a company can do

Yes, therefore the product should not be legal if these error's can't be minimized or the magnitude of the consequences are disastrous (random unpredictable crashing etc). "Errors" are not all created equal. Some are catastrophic and occur at random.
Software Is Eating the Individual
Amazon sent me a study guide......I told the recruiter I'm going to pass.

Until, I don't have a job I'm not grinding leetcode. I also dislike people who refer to themselves as ex-faang. I really don't care.
No, the agreement does not provide that Musk can withdraw from the agreement based on Twitter's (mis)representations to the SEC, as that is something that would have been covered by due diligence...which Musk waived.

And indeed, Musk's own letter to the SEC confirms that his sole reason for seeking the data is that it relates to his ability to acquire financing for the deal.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1418091/000110465922...
Took a while to find https://languagetool.org/dev almost everything else points to a commercial service.
Mining is heating my piece of shit house that would be filled with mould otherwise
>the people who have absolutely zero clue about how even the basic technology works

This won't be a problem when the regulation equates to: "get these death traps off the road, now". Or, "disable your not-intelligent pseudo-self driving now".

I'm not talking about working on the technology, I'm saying if it doesn't work get it off the market.
This seems true to me (as a non-woodworker whose ex-partner got really into it), but what she explained to me was that her own furniture would be higher quality and also made the way she wants it (which you can't really put a price on)

You can definitely pick up used solid wood furniture for cheaper than building it yourself (especially if you consider the opportunity cost of your time), but you might not get exactly what you want.
Right. There are no ads on the "compose tweet" page

Pew analysis (based on surveying humans) says "97% of tweet volume comes from the top 25% most active tweeters"[1]

So Musk is arguing about a statistic that twitter claims, which is that spambots make up less than 5% of users.

Now, if those bots are part of the most active 25%, then they make up 1/5 of the 'most active' user population. So it seems plausible that they could well be responsible for 1/5 of tweets.

Which matches exactly what Musk is claiming - that 20% of tweets are from spam bots.

Which still makes no difference to Twitter's ability to sell Advertising targeting the 95% of users who are humans, 75/95 (=79%) of which are only responsible for 3% of tweets, but... presumably... 79% of ad revenue. Because they only serve you ads when you're looking at a feed. And that's what those users are using Twitter to do.

[1] https://www.fastcompany.com/90697826/the-top-25-most-active-...
> Google Plus was late to the party.

That does not diminish the result of Facebook defending its turf. Google then (and now) was the 800 pound gorilla in tech. Facebook resisting the attack, and making Google run with it tail between its legs is not a small achievement.
Thanks for this answer, it's quite illuminating.
Cars are a significant source, though in China "industry" is a bigger source per [0]. I'm not sure what the ration worldwide (and I didn't find a global number in the quick search that found the links I am posting).

Crop residue burning also comes to mind as a source that would be particularly concentrated near... crops [1].

[0] https://www.acarindex.com/pdfler/acarindex-4786c244-1875.pdf

[1] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348764564_Estimatio...
Fellow coder and woodworker here. I can relate to the article for sure and I'd add that in my case I make a point of avoiding using software or computer-assisted anything in my woodworking. So no Fusion 360, no SketchUp, no CNC, no laser cutters, no 3D printers.

It sounds radical but it feels important to my mental health to keep my woodworking physical an analog as possible. Now, I'm still a power tool junkie so I'm not about to give up my table saw or planer.
Poe's law in action
Five percent isn’t a needle in a haystack. If you gave me 20 tweets from 20 accounts, would I be able to spot the one that’s a bot? Maybe?

If you gave me 100, could I spot the 5 that are bots? If you gave a team of paralegals a pile of 10k random accounts that are actively writing content, could they find the 500 that are supposedly bots?

Perhaps I’ve answered my own question: the bot accounts that get people hot under the collar are the ones that simply like and retweet, without ever posting any unique content?
Microsoft Defender now isolates hacked, unmanaged Windows devices
Can you please edit the swipes out of your comments? You've posted good things but unfortunately they're interspersed with hostile/inflammatory bits, and we're trying to avoid the latter here. It's not what this site is for, and it destroys what it is for.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
>The first would have been a 5-megapixel front-facing camera contained within a small display notch for use with video calls, while a 12-megapixel camera placed underneath would be used to take photos and capture video when the watch was detached from the wrist.

Good lord that is a stupid design.
The receiving bank often takes holds on the funds until they are specifically cleared from the originator bank or a fixed holding period. In that time, you can still deduct the money if you had the cash previously available or maybe if you're in good standing with the bank (not entirely sure on this part, probably different per bank).

The money is often frozen completely then returned to the defrauded party if caught quickly enough. Sometimes banks try to screw over people who are found to be victims of fraudulent transfers after the money has been pulled from the receiving bank.
Lots and I really do mean lots of drugs are funded almost entirely by governments and basic research at universities. Covid vaccines being one example.

If you look at where the money for research comes (for new drugs, not for variation of existing drugs) from in big pharma you'll see a significant part of it is government money.

But ethically do you think it is okay for big pharma to keep the intellectual property on medicine that can very well save lives? I think you have to make a very good case for patents being a force of innovation to justify keeping this medicine out of peoples reach. Let's not forget when bill gates spent millions of dollars distributing information in Africa against the copyright waiver the government was planning in order to make AIDS medicine affordable. Rent seeking on medication is, in my opinion, one of the worst use cases for copyright.

And then, from there, isn't access to culture also a human right? Personally I think it is. Of course in our current societal and economic system it is extremely punishing to be an artist. But to me, that indicates there is something wrong with our system when artists have to rent seek or starve! We do have to question the basis of what makes our society tick more carefully. There are always trade offs, but I think the direction we've taken... The direction of strenghtening rent seeking behavior is probably at odds with creativity and freedom of expression.

I mean, look at "memes". These images with funny text that people make. These are often anonymous pieces of work that are meant to be copied and distributed for free! I think the proliferation of talent and artwork is related to the disruption of access rather than copyright. Look at the amount of free work that is produced on the internet, from tiktok to memes to fanfiction. 60 years ago it took a lot to be a writer, publishing was very expensive so of course there needed to be a system to support that. But that's no longer the case, the internet gives you a way to reach millions of people instantly. Anything that can be digitalized is on a whole other level now.

So to me, the cost of maintaining copyright has to be put in the balance with its benefits... And I'm not sure we wouldnt see big budget productions without it. I mean, wasnt game of thrones the most pirated show ever anyway?
I’ve used Shotcut to edit almost all my videos that are on YouTube. It’s not the perfect UX, but it’s surprisingly flexible and capable.
According to that article, it looks like the bags have to be grounded to work:

"Snack packets are made with a foil that combines aluminum and mylar plastic, making them electrically conductive and ideal as a temporary electromagnetic shield for mobile devices—as long as the packet is closed and grounded—and you don't mind a few crumbs on your device."

I'm not sure if that's really true, or why that is... and if it is, how one could do it while on the move.
In practice though I'd go with four of those: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:D16_HEX_dice.JPG
(assuming that I can get them in four different colors)
I have been in plenty of suburbs without sidewalks or almost worse where there are bits and pieces of sidewalks that don’t connect to each other. Walking on the road is possible, but can be quite dangerous in such places.
I feel like this is just going around in circles, but let me take a stab at explaining the flaw in your reasoning.

Let’s try to simplify the problem. Let’s assume there are three numbered doors: 1, 2, and 3. A car is randomly placed behind one door, and goats behind the other two.

To make it easy, I will always guess door 1. In the ‘ignorant host’ scenario, we can just have the host always reveal door 2 (the math doesn’t change if he randomly selects which door to open or always opens the same door, so keeping it always door 2 makes it easier to understand).

Ok, so we guess door 1, and the host opens door 2.

1/3 of the time, the host reveals a car. Obviously we would switch in this case, since we know exactly where the car is.

2/3 of the time, the host will reveal a goat. When this happens, 1/2 the time the car will be in door #1 (our door) and 1/2 the time the car will be behind door #3. If the car is not revealed behind door #2, we have a 50% chance whether we switch or not.

With this random reveal style, we end up winning 1/3 (the chance of revealing the car behind #2) + (2/3 * 1/2) = 2/3rds chance of winning… which makes sense, because we get our original 1/3 chance plus the free 1/3 chance it is behind the revealed door. Crucially, though, it doesn’t matter if we switch or not. You always win if it is behind door #2 (because you are shown it) and win half the time if it is behind #1 or #3.

Contrast this with the case of the host always revealing a goat. In that case, you again have a 1/3 chance of it being behind your door #1 choice. However, in this case, you can essentially guess that your choice was wrong (2/3rds chance) by switching your guess, which will make your guess correct if it is either in door #2 or #3 (since the host will reveal the one which it isn’t behind if it is one of 2 or 3.)

In both the ignorant host and non-ignorant host situations, you end up with a 2/3rds chance of getting the car. However, in the ignorant host situation, you don’t need to switch unless the host shows the car in his reveal to get the 2/3rds odds.

Of course, it never hurts to switch in either case, so always switching is not a bad strategy, just not necessary if the host knows nothing.
I know it doesn't cover all the risks (including other tools and even poisoning) but it was a no-brainer for me to upgrade to a SawStop when I decided I was liking this hobby and was going to stick with it for a while.
Convoy, which just raised $260M, lays off 7% of workforce
Apple M2 Die Shot and Architecture Analysis – Big Cost Increase and A15 Based IP
You need to know what right-half-plane zeros are
> Why would sellers need to pay up to 6% to a realtor and buyers pay thousands in closing costs...because there is a disparity in access to information.

None of the type of information disparity that realtors help with are going to be solved by blockchains. Perhaps you could eventually build a better title system, but title-related expenses are a tiny portion of closing costs and there are reasons for the complexity.

The biggest portions of the closing costs that aren't directly related to the lender's pricing or real estate commissions-- title insurance-- can't go away anytime soon because the claims they protect against can be decades old. So even if you had a perfect title system today (which seems really hard) and everyone moved to it instantly, we'd still be stuck with those costs.
It looks like the outlook calendar
There's no mechanism for this specifically because shipboard MWe is so measly.

If the ship did have significant MWe capability you would have no way to get it shoreside, the shore power cables would burn. In availabilities where significant shore power is required (>800 Amps), sets of cables have to be welded directly to busbars because the sockets can't handle it.

So you've got 360kW (800A * 450V) that the average plant can deliver. The typical estimation is 10kW per home, so 36 homes from one naval plant.
Yeah, I was just highlighting how ignorant Musk is (sarcastically). This must’ve been what he meant by “hardcore software engineering.”
Whenever I need a function that i know has been done a million times before but for some reason isnt on stack overflow ill use copilot

E.g. converting default EM value and REM value to pixels

Like i couldnt seem to google what the default EM and REM values were but copilot knows better than me
$400, bought an unlocked Galaxy S10e refurbished on Amazon in early 2018. Still works fine.
> Are you saying "you" generally or me specifically?

Generally, as in all of us.
See, you have proven your own ignorance with your example!

When you buy a home, even if you waive all contingencies, including a home inspection, if the seller fails to disclose material problems with the house, the sellers will be liable. This liability extends for years past the close of sale.

So you accidentally gave a perfect counter example as to why you are wrong.
Because I live here and talk to people. I've been the victim of property crime that I have not reported because I know nothing will come of it. Bike theft and breaking into garages is extremely common, and it's well known that reporting it is a waste of time.
I've also witnessed more serious crime like smash & grabs and brazen shoplifting, though they are more rare.

What isn't rare is seeing people living in tents chopping up bikes and injecting themselves with needles in plain sight.

Your article also mentions the same thing:

> Many property crimes in the city go unreported, making it difficult to gauge the level of decline.

> San Francisco's increase in burglaries, however, did outpace the rest of the country.

People in SF complaining about crime aren't talking about homicides (thank goodness). But as mentioned in your article, burglary is way up. Most likely property crime is also way up. This is what people are complaining about. So saying "crime is actually down" doesn't seem to make a lot of sense.
No, the standard is Material Adverse Effect, and that would be something like “50% of revenue is fake, they’ve been cooking the books”. https://archive.ph/20220607031236/https://www.bloomberg.com/...
To add on most of the time I dont use copilot because it takes time for me to read and understand what copilot is doing, and sometimes it gets stuff like typescript types wrong/inaccurate and the code style is slightly different too
While I'm not sure that was a consideration here, sometimes C compilers produce better machine code when they got access to more function definitions. Eg. Sqlite recommends that embedders use the single ~10mb sqlite.c file[1] for both ease of use and performance reasons.

[1]: https://www.sqlite.org/amalgamation.html
Along these lines, I find that not many people correctly calculate the cost-per-use of their car. They only think of the cost of gasoline burned, and maybe tolls and parking. They don't think about the cost of insurance divided by the number of trips, or the capital cost of the car amortized over the years of ownership. If people thought hard about the cost-per-use of driving, then other transportation options start to look more attractive.
I'd use Vivaldi again when kinetic scrolling finally works in Wayland. AFAIK, the Chromium feature request regarding this is already 3 years old.
Foresight Technologies | Cloud Engineers | Remote, US-Based (EST)

* Cloud Engineer II

* Senior Cloud Engineer

* Principal Cloud Engineer

We are a tight-knit team that takes care of DevOps/AWS needs for a handful of startups and enterprise companies. We specialize in AWS and Terraform, with a strong focus on mentorship and engineer growth. Our team is remote-first with a hybrid office in Philadelphia, PA.

Please reach out to yosef@fs.tech to learn more about the roles and our team.
Many of those most expensive films spent much of their budgets on major actors. That’s a function of Hollywood accounting where actors need to be paid upfront for the potential value of the income generated rather than paid based on how well a film does.

The most expensive film on that list Pirates Of The Caribbean: On Stranger Tides (2011) out of a nominal 378.5 million paid $55 Million for Jonny Depp. Orlando Bloom made 11 million on that same film etc.

By comparison Orlando Bloom made got $175,000 For The Lord Of The Rings trilogy and 21 million for the Hobbit trilogy.
I read it almost exclusively via Safari in dark mode using the Noir extension on desktop and mobile. HN is a very simple site to invert.
Fun rundown to read, thanks for sharing!
It doesn't even matter, but sometimes I ask them to do a sliding window de-dupe.

A surprising number of people have a lot of trouble with the reading loop/termination condition.
This entire article does not even attempt to counter the claim being made in the letter it’s so up in arms about.

> blockchain technology, specifically so-called “public blockchains”… are not an improvement on existing non-blockchain solutions.

The article may have worked as a standalone article but doesn’t really provide a response to the letter it starts off with.
And exceptions can be considered a syntactic sugar on top of just such a monad. It's just that many believe it's too much sugar to be good for you, particularly the implicit rebind part.
> You should take a look at the Wikipedia list of the most expensive films, inflation-adjusted: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_expensive_films#M...

How on earth is Tangled #9 on this list?
> the capital cost of the car amortized over the years of ownership

How many years will I own my car? How do you know?

Maybe some folks buy a new car on a regular basis, but others will keep a car as long as they can. The denominator isn't known for everyone here.

And then there's inflation, recession, etc. which can make the numerator unclear too.
They say if you have an Amish mill nearby, they tend to be cheaper and a 2x4 is 2"x4".
It really depends on the language. In Python, exceptions are idiomatic even for non-fatal failures, the runtime is optimized for that performance-wise, and it's what API clients expect.
It's not the most stable app I've used, but on Linux I rarely crash these days - much better than where it was 2 - 3 years ago.

The Windows version is quite volatile the last time I tried it however.
Tesla cars involved in 16 crashes with emergency vehicles, regulators say
Why link to this one vs. huggingface?
Most twitter users don't tweet so using tweets to identify % of bots isn't helpful.
The Lumpy Pearls That Enchanted the Medicis (2019)
Ahh that's it, I'm not using autofill.
I just don't understand why crypto discussions seems to draw out so many rude comments. If satoshi wanted fame and fortune he could have both easily, but there are a ton of early bitcoins that haven't moved - so obviously he wasn't in it for the money or he would've used those coins.
- Casablanca

- five graves to Cairo

- stalag 17

- the big sleep

- north by northwest

- the 39 steps

- the third man

- the great escape

- where eagles dare

- a bridge too far

- the bridge on the river kwai

- dr no

- goldfinger

…amongst many many others
I think owning your own domain is enough. Use social media to place links to your web site and blog.

I don’t completely take my own advice: I have gone back to using Blogger for the convenience, but I periodically save/dump my data.
But people are well aware of the cost of carrying insurance and of buying a car in the first place. Those costs aren't incurred per-use; accounting for them per-use can only make car ownership look more attractive than otherwise, not less.