skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yeah, but what is the file extension?

If it is .jpx, maybe.

Otherwise, no.

(Only partially kidding, unfortunately. Outcomes sometimes hinge on trivial details.)
It was a whole zoo of O'Reilly books, including

UNIX Systems Administration

The Perl Cookbook

DNS and BIND

AWK

and too late for me to learn the basic, but valuable nonetheless: The Practice of System and Network Administration.
It’s showing out of stock on Amazon.

Here’s a Wikipedia link for the curious: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Method_of_loci
Sure but even sixty odd years later Mussolini was struggling to force people to drop their regional identities and adopt an Italian one. From what I can tell (as I'm neither that old nor Italian) even by the 50s or 60s it was still common to find folks who were only fluent in a regional language.

> official or prestige circumstances in Italian

Lamborghini differentiated itself from Ferrari in large part by being brash and in your face. Given what countach means I think it's pretty safe to say that they were not trying to come up with a prestigious name.
It depends on where the vehicle is in its life cycle. New Corvettes, for instance, are frequently custom-ordered. The options the buyer has are:

1) Buy off-the-rack from a local Chevy dealer. For the first couple of years after a major revision, the dealers mark up the cars to ridiculous levels. You will pay out the nose for instant gratification. This used to be an issue for high-end sports cars only, but these days even a Honda Civic customer can expect the same treatment.

2) Order from a local dealer. You typically don't have to pay as much for this, depending on your relationship with the dealer. But it can take a very long time for the dealer to get an allocation slot from the factory, especially for smaller stores that don't sell many Corvettes. At the time they take your order (and your deposit), they may not bother telling you that they don't have an allocation yet. You could wait a year or potentially more.

3) Buy off-the-rack from one of a few massive dealers, typically out of state. The dealer's allocation is based on how many Corvettes they sold in previous years, so some dealers specialize in selling from inventory at MSRP or below to achieve the absolute maximize possible sales volume. You will have to drive the car back home or have it shipped.

3a) A subset of these buyers will use a local dealer to accept "courtesy delivery." This means that the car is custom-ordered from the out-of-state volume dealer and shipped directly from the factory to your local dealer for delivery for a relatively-low fixed fee. Local dealers are about as enthusiastic about this as you'd expect, and many will refuse to participate. These buyers save some money initially, but are low on the totem pole when it comes to scheduling service appointments and getting loaner cars.

For Corvettes in particular, the custom-order options can be combined with delivery at the factory/museum complex in Bowling Green. European cars are sometimes offered this way as well, where you get to drive the car around for a while before it goes on the boat.

Once the car is no longer the hottest new thing on the block, the prices come down for both custom orders and off-the-shelf deals. The same purchase/delivery choices are available, though. Almost everything said about the Corvette purchasing process above applies to new Jeeps and pickups nowadays.
Automatically update Docker gem versions from Gemfile.lock
Do you know which Top Gear episode did this?
Maybe I'm not remembering it correctly. Basically you had colored wires representing values flowing through functions, and then you had white wires that represented ordered execution, much like the IO monad. Is it possible to have side effects from nodes without the white wire?
> missing some "obvious" applications

what would that be?
I definitely do not want lead in any emissions but this has to be a pretty small contributor. Plus airplanes I imagine are going to spread that lead over a much larger area vs inhaling car fumes. Has to be pretty low on their list of things they need to do.

That being said I would one day like to get my pilots license and mess around a bit with flying - so common people - lets get this show on the road! ....or air?
About the Security of Passkeys
> on par with classifying bumblebees as fish

So you're saying it's quite reasonable when you look at what actually happened?

The law defined a handful of categories. "fish" is actually "fish and miscellaneous". Invertebrates are explicitly part of that miscellaneous.
I would love a reference to a formalized version of this..

Edit: Found Polyform! https://polyformproject.org/what-is-polyform/
Creations are not meant to be controlled. Gods don't create things to control them either (most mythologies have free will or something similar). We want to create an AGI for the same reason we make art. To try to create something beautiful.
While I'm not disagreeing, according to WikiPedia the amount of 100LL sold per year is 0.14% of that of MoGas (2008). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avgas#Consumption Shell, Exxon, etc. probably see AvGas as a pain.
why is there so much crypto stuff? Probably me but by default I don't trust things that are crypto related.
3. The store does little or no testing so users would have been better off with official binaries
GAMI would probably have to license the tech to the big boys for production in high volumes.
> I would think volume is a better metric because landfills don't really much care about mass.

Most EU countries have actually outlawed landfills in favor of waste-to-energy systems. [1] Of course waste-to-energy only works for stuff like plastics, not for electronics which you'd rather want to disassemble carefully to recover the precious metals.

> If you wanted to save trash you'd probably go after packaging.

Which the EU does too. There is legislation underway (or possibly already passed) to outlaw many types of single-use plastic items. Everyone switching from plastic straws to paper straws may actually be another case of Brussels effect.

> it's so far down the scale as to be pointless to prioritize over almost anything

The thing is, from experience we know that these legislations take so long to enact and enforce that you cannot just start with the biggest items, wait for it to be done, and then move to the next biggest item. You need to tackle many possible avenues for waste reduction at once.

[1] https://www.cewep.eu/landfill-taxes-and-restrictions/
Cloudron is also source available - https://git.cloudron.io
Making Movies by Sidney Lumet and Leading by SAF taught me more about management than any other books.
Apologies, I read the article. This is a fine change, no argument.

I thought they were going to allowlist known peripherals, & refuse to talk to anything not approved.
> An individual being paid to provide a service is commercial under that, and most legal definitions of the word.

The license only forbids third-party to offer Umbrel by themselves. If you pay for hosting, and install it on your own, it would be fine.
Given the complexity of the physics apparently involved in brain state, the "and CPUs can simulate physics" needs to do a lot of work for it to be a practical possibility.

Simulating the physics of dopamine on neurotransmitter cells in silicon is an extremely complicated roundabout way of getting a program to run faster in response to certain stimuli, but most alternatives are likely to fall well short of conveying the full sensory experience of human emotion. And its a difficult goal to know you've hit when even simple text-parsing neural networks which don't attempt to model human sensory experience can plausibly mimick descriptions of it...
Distros then package the stable parts and the core engine is updated on-demand.

Would any distro allow this? AFAIK they don't allow distro packages to depend on outside stuff.
If you are referring to sandstorm, kentonv (founder of sandstorm) has made some great points, if you scroll up.
Thank you for taking the time. I am just concerned that when an objectionable endeavor is criticized for being based on bad science, it leaves room for the inference that if the science was done better, the endeavor would be acceptable. Thus, my desire to stress the distinction between competence and morality.

> I also think there's a useful distinction to be made between the terms "genetics" and "eugenics".

Yes, I was thinking of that point. Part of the problem in discussing "eugenics" is that it is commonly used to cover two projects. One is to understand the nature of the inheritance of physical traits, what we call "genetics". The other is to use that understanding to pursue population management, what we call "animal husbandry" in one context.
Tell HN: Gmail is increasingly flagging legitimate and important emails as spam
I'm having a lot of important messages flagged as spam by gmail. Invoices, AWS messages, ...
What is going on?!
Got it. Well that is good at least.

Realistically I can see JPEGXL becoming a good DELIVERY format but I highly doubt any industries will be swapping to it for production use (or archiving) given there are very widely adopted formats and standards already that can do the same thing.

I'm almost tempted to say that trying to make ONE format that is meant for both (delivery and production or archiving which are inherently opposites in terms of requirements) is a bad idea just from a marketing and ease of use standpoint. Sometimes its nice to have two clearly separate technologies meant specifically for their purpose.
It could also be that the person in charge or scheduling gets a bonus for on time delivery and dinged for late deliveries but isn't punished for boats sinking.

Misaligned incentives exist all around us.
Fascinating. Source? I would have thought Microsoft would want to get Windows on as many machines as possible.
Josh here -- cofounder of Gantry.

Depends on the use case. If you're able to gather feedback from your users, then that's a great starting point.

If not, then it can be helpful to use a proxy to detect data points that are more likely than average to be failures. For example, a simple proxy is your model's confidence, but this is a deep topic. You can look at the literature on active learning if you want to learn more. This blog post is a great starting point: https://lilianweng.github.io/posts/2022-02-20-active-learnin...
Consistency is a non-issue for me. Reason I don't do it is because neither the update nor the uninstall experience are standardized and good.

I guess what I would really want is a) manually built packages install into opt and use a mechanism like update-alternatives to get things into PATH or wherever they need to be. b) Possibility to track an https endpoint for information about new releases. Could be something as simple as a text file of all versions with url of tarball and a flag for whether the version has known security issues.
Ah that's a cool idea to use GIF for it. Seems like the video player is the trick in terms of consumer-side then, making me wonder if it's wise to expect any support for this idea whatsoever. Maybe if somebody creates a nice WASM player with support someday.

It's really too bad this wasn't handled long ago, with some web-safe video emphasis to go along with all the web-safe imagery. Lossless/indexed or lossy, your choice...
"thinner" is not a universally superior quality. It also means "more likely to get bent or broken" which implies "more likely to need replacing" which is one of the direct aims of this legislation.
Its available on the web versions as well (in addition to the Android/iOS and the desktop apps).
> Plex and/or jellyfin stand out as huge misses right out of the gate.
But the two CC line resistors are spec-conform? That's how 5V sinks are supposed to work.

I agree that the whole USB PD stack is way over complicated, I still don't get why the electrical layer and the on-the-wire protocol is so complex. Wouldn't a 3.3 V bidir UART with a CRC at the end do a fine job?
Having a body basically gives you a way to interact the world. That is only good if you want to model the world and the actuator-control limits.

Now, if we want to model the world (or build "world model", in LeCun's words), I am not sure "interacting" with the world is a necessary condition given the amount of data we already have. GPT-3 probably has some vague "world model" inside these parameters and we don't know how to effectively extract it out.
I'm considering TBT3/4 for our VR headset's tethered mode. It's a bit of a pain to implement, but the data rate is worth it.

For reference, we need 2-4 lanes of DP HBR3 (depending on compression) + PCIe Gen3x4 for the camera passthrough. TBT3/4 could do it over a single cable.

Feeds into the nightmare that is implementing that entire ecosystem though...
I imagine it would be pretty interesting to graph the data on how many people tried what incantations first

10 print "hello"

has GOT to be the leader.
FWIW it's explained pretty clearly on the third page of the DEMO program
What an immediately cynical, hilarious and eventually thought provoking response.

I suspect it violates HN guidelines (too snarky?!?!). However, I for one applaud it's pith!
No, I do not believe that a multi trillion dollar company would spend billions of dollars making a major change to their devices, without having any idea of if it will be better or not.

Whatever internal research that these companies made, to make them want to change their multi billion dollar market like this, they can go public with it first.
Well, insurers tend to go off hard data (they rarely go looking for trouble), and it takes a decent number of sunk ships to start being a statistically significant shift.

Until then, it’s the same price.
> My Nintendo Switch uses USB-C charging, but I can't use my MacBook charger for it.

Then I guess you got one from the first hardware revision. I have a 2018 Switch (second hardware revision as far as I understand), and I have in the past charged it successfully with Apple chargers and Lenovo chargers.
There's a related idea in Hofstadter's GEB, where he asks: if a machine is able to think, will it still be able to do math fast? That is to say, is there a contradiction between the mechanical nature of computers as we have them and intelligent organisms? Embodiment seems similar to this. All existing examples of intelligence we have are in some sense constrained and complex. Either by having to physically interact with the world, by having sophisticated internal states and representations, and so on.

I think there's something to that just given the evidence of intelligence we have around us, and it's why I'm skeptical of the extremely popular, but very fictional Skynet-like "idiot savant" that separate operational intelligence both from physical bodies as well as from other states of mind.
Check your health especially cognitive - memory decline is not normal at your age or twice your age. Sleep apnea (for example) often goes undetected and causes cognitive issues like this.
Approval rules are also arguably a "compliance feature". If they moved those up to Ultimate, I think they'd be making Premium useless for many teams.
Many did, but Gordon Kane is a standard example because he is kind of more brazen about it than most.

In 2011: "This is a profound turning point in the quest for a fundamental unified theory of the physical world. The properties and mass of the LHC's Higgs boson suggest that physicists will soon find superpartners for particles, and that we have begun to connect string theory to the real world." from https://www.nature.com/articles/480415a. We didn't find superpartners.

In 2019: "One important lesson from studying such models is that we should not have expected to find superpartners at the LHC with masses below about 1500 GeV." from https://physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/PT.6.3.2019031.... I mean, yes, you should not have expected that, but you totally did, so why should I believe when you say the next LHC will find superpartners?
Haven't worked much with Laravel, but I know it's been around for many years now. I have MVC experience so it should not be so hard to get the basics. Laravel was something I had a very small brush with in a 2018 job. Was really burned by the client so it ended quickly.

Also, please excuse me from going on a tangent here. I have some kind of paranoia about picking a library or framework for a job, only for it to fall in demand soon after. Like how can I tell if some framework like Laravel is in the twilight years or not? My MVC of choice in 2012 was CodeIgniter. Nobody really uses that anymore. Not a good thing for my career. I just have an irrational fear of just picking the "late" thing again. Like the same fear some people get that every stock they buy in the stock market causes the price to go down.

On the JS side of things, I picked up VueJS and React for some side projects. I'm probably more up to date on VueJS though. (another dev informed me that my React project's code is 6 years out of date and nobody really codes React like that anymore)
In the Face of Numerous Threats, Bees Are Producing Less Honey
I'm rather averse to using cloud services for password management. KeePass all the way, syncing the key file with syncthing or something.
Why would they not set an alarm and go to sleep while travelling?
easily disabled which is good!
Global Economic Prospects Report – World Bank [pdf]
This is just some rationalization that security nerds like to regurgitate on each other.
Karaoke versions of songs are unique productions and their producers should absolutely be compensated.
Or they run for president.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHckZCxdRkA

Or they continue becoming even more Tucker Carlson than they already were. (side note, supposedly Stewart was super super hungry in this)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFQFB5YpDZE
GNOME doesn't need FSF endorsement. I would even say that the FSF might benefit from GNOME's endorsement.
There’s something visceral about being in one. It’s like a living animal that just wants to go-go-go.

Who cares if it’s slower around a track, unless you’re actually going around a track for some reason.
No, actually, you wouldn't. As has been explained many times in this thread, that isn't how this kind of regulation works. I do understand that doesn't fit your narrative though.

Rather than making lots of unfounded assertions about what "will" happen, as you keep doing, I would encourage you to actually read the details first.
> [...] Maybe your idea of hype relies on conference talks or some other metric I don't get?

Yes, I'm referring to programmer circle related social networks (HN, r/programming, ...).

> It's quite surprising that aside from Fortran, C derivatives and Rust, no one gives a damn about performance, but when it's haskell, it suddenly becomes a problem.

Because performance problems are particularly hard to solve in Haskell due to its high level of abstraction.

> Is that some kind of strawman where if haskell doesn't deliver on being touted as the gift of God to programmers, then it's bad?

Yes, given the fact that it's praised to such a high degree, users might have extremely high expectations, but are likely to be underwhelmed if it does not solve their problems in a vastly superior way.
keeping daily notes works for me. say for a goal of losing weight. I got a daily weight chart, the curve keeps going downhill, that has motivated me to stay on track...

my understanding, if something is not your interest/hobby, need to find something as a good motivation/self-encouragement to enter a good cycle... find some fun in it ...
New Evidence of Age Bias in Hiring, and a Push to Fight It (2019)
Ymmv but lack of focus (mainly from using my phone or checking online stuff too much) has destroyed my memory because I'm always half distracted when I'm doing stuff. If this may be the problem, leave your phone somewhere else when you're working, and look at what you can cut out from your online or attention economy routine.
British plugs are the only thing I will ever get nationalistic about. They’re great.

Hurt like a sod to stand on if the prongs are face up though!
Names certainly do matter: they're how we effectively communicate with each other. If you call it a mappable, and someone else calls it a chainable (as was said elsewhere in this comment thread), how have we eased confusion? If I try to google what a chainable is, what will I find?

On the other hand, if I say "it's a monad" then people who have encountered the term before know what I mean (even if they've had no need to understand monads in depth) and people who have not will successfully find information about the right thing if they search for it.

Monads have a particularly bad reputation for being hard to learn, despite appearing in non-general form in every modern language. Since people seem to have little trouble grasping the way in which futures, streams, and options work I don't think there's really such a great challenge involved - but the culture of running screaming from the mere word doesn't help matters in the least.
self hosting doesn't always mean opensource. could be people wanting to have control of their data. there are many closed source self hosting apps - emby, plex, confluence/jira, teamspeak, filerun to name a few.
I've never had that great of a memory. The upside is that you can have a bad memory and good note taking skills and be more effective than the 'good memory' people. Really it's just that I forget in a day what other people forget in a week so it's not that big of a gap. But some considerations:

1. Put everything in the issue tracker that you can. This includes notes on what actually happened when you did the work. Include technical details.

2. Try to push everyone else to use the issue tracker. Also makes you sound like the professional in the room.

3. Have a very lightweight note taking mechanism and use it as much as possible. I am gud at vim so I use the Voom plugin (which just treats markdown headings as an outline but it's enough to store a ton of notes in a single .md file). Don't try to make these notes good enough to share as that adds too much overhead.

4. Always take your own notes in a meeting.

5. I will revisit my notes on a project from time to time, and sometimes walk through all of them, but I'm not really treating them like flashcards to memorize. I'm just looking for things that might need some renewed attention. Same with the backlog.

6. In general, I don't try to improve my memory because I don't know what I need to know for a week vs. what I won't look at again for a year. So I focus on being systematic about having good-enough notes on everything and don't really expect to remember anything. (I do remember some things but it's random.)
*Disclaimer: I'm not trying to be rude with my question, please forgive any perceived negative tone -- I am just curious.

> I recently tried to set up an SSH server on NixOS and gave up after a day. And I love NixOS.

Setting up OpenSSH is one of the more trivial tasks on any Unix-like operating system. So I'm curious as to why you "love" NixOS despite it sounding like you aren't comfortable with (at least what I consider) a very trivial system setting change?

If you add the following to your configuration.nix and rebuild your system this will setup OpenSSH:

```
services.openssh.enable = true;
```

And if you have enabled the firewall you can make sure that port 22 is allowed with this:

```
networking.firewall.allowedTCPPorts = [ 22 ];
```

And then just rebuild your system.

Being unable to enable SSH on NixOS sounds more of like a lack of understanding of how to use NixOS. Again, I'm exceedingly curious as to why you love NixOS but are unable to make such a trivial change to your system? Did you actually install NixOS on your system?

I am a huge fan of people at any stage of expertise loving NixOS and playing with it and I apologize if this question sounds like me being a dick or trying to police your experience -- please continue to love NixOS!