skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Probably the biggest reason is the fan.

Allows for increased sustained performance as benchmarks have shown with M1.
100% agree. And the fact that you're being downvoted so heavily is pretty indicative of the biases in this community to me. Not that it's a surprise, I have personally struggled against those biases my entire adult life. But it's sad.

We (North America) filter children early in the education system on the basis of their ability to do accurate arithmetic. Most jurisdictions don't even really teach math proper until high school. By the time kids get there, they've lost their self-confidence because the sheer tedium and boredom of the curriculum in the early grades.

Personally: Because of my primary and high school math grades I was barred from entering a computer science degree. But I have a 20+ year software engineering career only because I just really loved computers and pushed my way into the industry, and ended up at Google among other places, despite the lack of degree. But it was hard, really hard, to get into these jobs. And there's always been people in those jobs who gave me the sense they didn't think I belonged there with them.

The way we're teaching math to kids is on the whole really awful. I've seen both my kids struggle with it, despite being gifted intellectually and scoring incredibly high on the WISC-V.

The whole process seems geared towards grinding kids down in repetition and struggle.

Meanwhile we have machines to automate arithmetic and most math generally. In general, my sense of the way math is taught these days: it's an insult to the human spirit.

And people who excel in it and struggled through it and "won" have an intrinsic bias in seeing it as the "right" filter and "right" gating for what they're doing today, even when it clearly is not always directly related.
It's in a very MVP-state, but I created stick, "shareable Git-powered notebooks". It meets some (but not all) of your criteria. It is FOSS (MIT).

Features:

- Notebooks are standard git repositories containing .md files.

- Notebooks may be used privately, shared with one or more users privately, or shared publicly.

- Notes may be customized to improve usability, such as rendering a to-do list with automatic de-duplication and sorting.

Repository: https://code.rocketnine.space/tslocum/stick

Demo (read-only except checkboxes): https://stick.rocketnine.space/#login/c89f5381659ad34bd84967...
From what I've heard, Microsoft and Qualcomm signed an exclusive deal for Windows on ARM for a number of years. Microsoft could theoretically release a Windows version for the M1 but they'd be breaking their contract with Qualcomm which can only go down badly.

However, in a few years' time the deal runs out and it might be possible again, unless they can think of a reason to renew the deal (i.e. inclusion of Qualcomm's optimised x86/amd64 translation layer).
I am building a platform like this. Also, you could try out Lunchclub.
You don't use concepts from Discrete Math more than that?
It's anti-intellectualism because it judges, bars progress, and limits success in other intellectual fields based on measures of success in one field.
In my experience the issue isn't usually friends. It's people you have to stay in contact with like family, or maybe coworkers, and they don't understand what asynchronous communication is and have unrealistic expectations that now that you have an alway-on device, you will be ready to respond to it immediately. If you don't have that in your life, you are lucky.
I don't really track it that closely, the impression I had was most (or at least many?) of them do. Do you have some particular set of features in mind?
I think part of the issue is that the title of the article is using the word "ran" in "ran Genghis Khan's Empire" to imply that Börte made strategic, judicial, or political decisions, and then the text in the article talks about more operational or logistical work. It's hyperbolic.

The reasons are obviously: precious, precious clicks.

A title like "The Women Who Kept Genghis Khan's Empire Running" would have been better.
Note that even the previous draft specification (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-http/34/) was a mapping of HTTP semantics on top of QUIC. It didn't carry too many transport specific concerns - which e.g. HTTP/2 did, since it cared about flow control and other things.

I have yet to read RFC 9114, but I guess it's refinded to fit better on top of the new HTTP semantics spec (RFC 9110).
> Arguably nothing is free, and nothing will ever be free, as long as private organizations want to make a profit.

For things to be free, I think a slave workforce will be necessary. But even then there is a cost to feeding and housing the slaves.
>The incentive for Apple to do this would be what: do extract a little more revenue from their smallest-volume OS?

I think that's only part of the picture. Yes it would boost their services business, but Macbook/iMac users are a small part of the picture these days. It's smarter from a technology centralization standpoint. Why have almost all your products centered around iOS codebase, and then your laptops/iMacs (small % of total devices) on legacy OSX. A better strategy would be, use a single OS codebase, and add layers of functionality the bigger / more pro a device gets. Makes it way easier to advance the software for your entire product line.

Btw, expanding iOS to Macbooks/iMacs does not mean throwing pro / dev users under the bus. They can think of a way to make "iOS-macOS" appealing to devs, by simulating some of the OSX features, like terminal and the ability to write software on-device.
This is dumb. Math is not just a set of tools you take out of a toolbox to solve specific problems.

Math is a way of thinking.

It's invaluable for solving all kinds of problems.
> The context of this thread is democracy and the rights of Americans.

That is part of the context. It might be one person's entire notion of the context. However, different people, all reasonable, may have different contexts.

Not realizing or recognizing this can contribute to thinking someone else is "off topic". But on what basis can one person claim that someone else is not on topic?

In these comments, myself (and others too) include information (and disinformation) tactics as part of the context here too.
Kwikset's SmartKey deadbolts are very common in hardware stores, and quite difficult to pick.
Abuse and violence.
Meta Shakes Up AI Unit Amid Drive for Growth
Doesn't the block generation become faster with PoS and thereby increase the supply?
So you're using Hearthstone as an example when it's also P2W and has lootboxes?

Why is everybody so irrational on hackernews now.
Moving to PoS is a necessary but not sufficient criteria for reducing transaction fees. The Ethereum merge will reduce them slightly (as it will reduce the block time from 16 seconds to 12 seconds, or something like that) but it won't make any big difference. In the coming year, there probably will also be general ZK-rollups on Ethereum mainnet that will reduce transaction fees substantially. (You can already use ZK-rollups for some limited things like transactions, but not for arbitrary Ethereum operations.) Also, way out in the future, there will be data sharding which will reduce fees on mainnet significantly, look up "proto-danksharding".
Does this form factor appeal to anyone here? Presumably someone is buying these but I just don’t see the appeal
It does. But that is not adequate. Unfortunately Google does not understand users at all, and hence, unfortunately does not understand practical security.

The first thing you have to understand is that users click everything, especially when it isn't doing what they want. So websites throw these prompts up endlessly, hoping users will inadvertently click it. Worse, some sites will abuse alert() and essentially demand the user accept installing an extension or enabling notifications to proceed. (Particularly guilty here is search ads and the garbage ads Edge puts on their new tab page.)

Then the doubly problematic design here is that websites can prompt people to accept these, but users have to find an obscure setting to either remove those approvals or deny new requests. Users by and large don't even know that exists.

I disable notification requests in every browser I put my hands on, but unfortunately I can't put my hands on every browser on Earth. It's really up to web standards bodies and browser vendors to realize the API is doing drastically more harm than good.
Like I already said, surrendering does not stop Putin from killing.
In this case it just redirects to a short description :/
Computers are not just the sum of their hardware specs.
I think that there are like three concepts in math or the world, the concepts being the adjoint, norm and fixed point.

https://github.com/adamnemecek/adjoint

The concept of a fixed point is so ubiquitous.
How about login walls for free content? Most news sites allow for a limited number of free articles a month except that their version of free requires I create an account and log in. So a major news site like the nytimes will always surface to the top of Google search results and if I select their article I am met with:

>"Thanks for reading The Times. Create your free account or log in to continue reading."

And even should you go through with creating an account and logging in, you are stuck with an ever present creeping footer that advertises a paid subscription as well as advertisements that are inserted between paragraphs of the article.
maybe we need some kind of workaround for adblocker-blockers.

load the entire page including the ads and javascript and strip it out on the client side for rendering.

make the httpd side think that the client is a dead normal microsoft edge or chrome browser with zero plugins installed and deliver the page.

it's an arms race the adblocker-blockers aren't going to win.
an incredibly unverified number
Higher mathematics isn’t about performing fancy calculations — it’s rare to find a calculation that requires some higher mathematical tools that can’t be done more simply using elementary methods. So it’s no wonder people aren’t explicitly using higher mathematics everyday.

Instead, higher mathematics allows you to add powerful new features to your mental models, and reason about these features accurately and effectively. A key example: the Fourier transform. Understanding a signal in terms of its frequency components is immensely valuable for understanding how periodic phenomena work, and since periodic systems are ubiquitous, this often leads to concrete insights into concrete problems. With this more sophisticated understanding of the problem, you can write down a solution that can be implemented with “8th grade algebra and a little programming”. Other similar examples: singular value decomposition, spectral decomposition, probabilistic reasoning (MLE, Bayesian inference).

It’s important to equip people with the tools required to build powerful mental models of the world around them, so they can solve hard problems. Higher mathematics offers many such tools.
Try explaining a password manager to your nana, and having her use it. Then explain to her how she can install it on her phone and have it synchronised across all her devices. Password managers are awesome, but way too technical to become mainstream. You shouldn't have to install 3rd party software for something so fundamental. The password system really needs an overhaul and hopefully this will go along way towards fixing it.
Someone I know is unable to upgrade their MAC, I do not know what kind or how old it is. But is is not that old, maybe 10 years or so.
Fool me once… twice… won’t get fooled again!

Yep, memories of a $300 attachment to play my Information Society CD+G, which was cool but not enough.
LOL yeah, lack of personal living space is not realistic in the slightest. I think it's meant to just inspire people to question things, though.
There goes NYT, fading into relevance, because 10,000 nerds on Hacker News don't click nytimes.com links anymore...
Students on campus prefer QR codes, or real people? Do the QR codes embed the info, or require a working internet connection? Is the real problem how legible and discoverable the best by date is?

Minimum info here at best. You can do better here, Cornell.
https://gitlab.com/magnolia1234/bypass-paywalls-chrome-clean

This repo is also a great alternative. Bypasses almost all known paywalls.
CAT scanners have an X-ray source, and a linear detector array mounted opposite each other on a ring that spins continuously as you are moved through the scanner. The position of the source and each detector element are known to a high degree of precision for each and every moment of the scan. Thus each detector signal at any given moment is the density of your body along a line between those two points.

All of the data becomes a set of simultaneous linear equations. The computer solves these equations and generates a 3 dimensional array of voxels (volume pixels), which are then saved as your CAT scan data.

The viewer software can then show a view through any arbitrary plane, adjusting contrast, etc.
Do you really think whoever wrote this article fondly reminisces of the Mongol Empire? If I list some positives of Byzantium does that mean I am fond of whatever they did in aggregate?
You can use SMS as a backup 2FA to login to your online Apple ID account, but that's not enough to access the iCloud keychain.

The decryption keys for that data are only stored on your iDevices. It's E2EE after all. So while you can access your Apple account via the SMS 2FA backup, you won't be able access your actual iCloud Keychain data/passkeys without some sort of access to your iDevices. (it might be sufficient if they're online somewhere and you have their login credentials?)

A bit confusing, but if it really is E2EE, then you can see why SMS alone wouldn't be enough to recover your Passkeys.
Well, that sucks. The blogspam websites that spam notifications to make money off ads will be able to afford the certificate but getting notifications from your self-hosted services will cost you instead.

Hopefully Apple revises this policy (i.e. give out free certificates limited to a certain amount of notifications or a certain amount of domains) but I wouldn't keep my hopes up.

Luckily, several governments are preparing to add legislation to force Apple to allow alternative browser engines, so there's still a chance this problem might resolve itself in the future.
Yeah, that's the issue here, Apple positions itself as a luxury device. Personally, I think there's a halo effect from iPhone being good, but it doesn't mean that other Apple products are. It's just hype and undeserved hype at that.
Also, I just don't like Apple as an industry player, they rewrite and replace into CLOSED software (Embrace, extend, and extinguish), to use most of it, you need to be 100% Apple devices. This is terrible. As consumers, we've benefited GREATLY from vendors competing, and that's what has driven a lot of innovations on our table top. Apple goes against all of that, and this is why I don't/won't spend more money there. If you see WWDC at least 40% was about replacing already existing functionality of Google Docs.
> Why is Math specially subsidized? That’s good argument.

First, that's a question, not an argument.

Second, math is special because it's an exact science, as opposed to a natural science. Encompassing the study of "logic", "information", "things that change", "symmetry", "equality" or equivalence... it applies to pretty much everything. In other words it's one of the skills that has the most potential to be widely applicable.

> Again, you’re just aiming your conclusion.

I'm not sure what you mean by "aiming", but I am referring to the burden of proof [1], which the author has not shifted one iota.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)
My bank sends me a 1099 when I earn $0.14 of interest on my checking account. There is no reason this hypothetical crypto company couldn't do the same.
> I'm so tired of Google inventing arbitrary stuff for the web, implementing it, and everyone then expecting Mozilla and Apple to just follow suit.

I agree, the situation is awful.

It'd be so nice to have a more diverse & robust community of web browsers. The jury pool for "voting" on stnadards is way too small. I'd also point out that Microsoft is still very much here. They may be using Chrome's engine, but they're under no obligation to enable all the features, to stick exactly to what Google is doing. If Edge agrees, it's at least somewhat of a vote.

Right now, either Apple & Mozilla have effective veto power on the web. Mozilla is deeply understaffed & barely if at all able to keep up with development. They thankfully started answering request-for-positions a bit back, but I see a lot of specs now-a-days with no response.

There's so much web-hating about that things are really tough. There's so many people for whom the web is joy & amazingness, & this feels like a hard condescension to face. Push back feels like broad push back against doing good things, feels like a desire to keep what feels great to us from growing. Tools like VSCode are superpowered badasses, fast & capable with great easy-to-write extensions; true blood of the web. But we can't escape Slack being a dog, and people's long & deep feelings of dislike.

Apple has long (well over a decade) been the foot dragging, complaining, miserable laggard, with lots of their own ideas & little willingness to play with others. They invested so little into their webtech for decades, just absolutely miniscule, and the teams had heavy bias, strong ways of thinking they wouldn't bend on. Mozilla recently seems to have switched sides: having given up on WebOS & an rich web platform, they now seem to spend more time claiming to be "pro-privacy" & fighting against really good new capabilities (eg WebMIDI) than working things forwards. Apple and Mozilla both know Google is widely reviled & mistrusted, and are marketing the shit out of their anti-web-platform stances; 'any risk to users is too great!'.

Thankfully we see a ton of really really good work happening on https://wicg.io. It's a good neutral territory to make the platform better. Tons of the web improvements happening are vendor-neutral, are just people with good ideas, that eventually, with support & community, stand a chance of getting sensible improvements implemented in 1 or 2, very occasionally 3 browsers. Alas, there's Apple. :'(

Anyhow, yes.
I think this WWDC session will discuss that exact scenario. From the short description, I think they are still going to let the community handle the wiring of this into a VM management application. But, hopefully, this tutorial will make this process much clearer. I’ve tried to follow some of the older Framework examples, but I didn’t make it very far.

https://developer.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2022/10002/

HN Thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31645000
I’ve been using Sublime Text since the Aztecs and it is really fast, but not as fast as what I described earlier. Yep, using it on macOS with 120Hz Liquid Retina (M1 MBP 14 inch).

I’ll check Jet Brains zero latency mode. I didn’t know that exists, cool.
The Satanist Neo-Nazi Plot to Murder U.S. Soldiers
I think it is a red herring to see the lack of push notification support on web as some kind of “big” handicap vs native. There are so many advantages that native brings, push notifications is probably in a second tier list (10th+).
It'll always be a cat-and-mouse-game.
Anecdata here, but I owned an HP Spectre 360 laptop a few years ago and I would never buy another HP laptop again. It cost almost as much as a Macbook, and within ~2 years of gentle use, mostly around the house, it blew a speaker, the webcam developed a purple tint, the rubber strips on the base peeled off, and when I tried to open the case to check for a second M.2 slot, one of the Torx screws stripped and remains stuck.
Has never worked for me
I believe this is for iOS/iPadOS
Right, the problem is nobody cares about the business at all. They care about the content. The same problem exists for streaming services and cable TV channels before them. People want one or more specific shows, they don’t think Netflix is any better than Hulu, and are happy to cancel and move their streaming dollars from service to service when something else interests them.

Subscriptions just subsidize mediocrity.
Materialism and rampant consumption, yes. But thinking this as a generational affect seems a superficial analysis. Older generation is pretty materialistic (like many countries that became rich quick) perhaps more so than the young. Showing pictures of old people hanging out enjoying hobbies to back this point is silly because younger generation would be either in school(or 학원) or working!

Cuteness out of emptiness you feel inside is also for me fall short. My reading(armchair psychology, yes. But as a Korean who thought about this a lot) is that this is more to do with patriarchal culture where man and woman appeals there take-careablity(woman: man would want to take care of me/man: I could be a good protector). In confucious culture there's lot of emphasis on who takes care of whom and familial analogy is applied to every relationships.
Would Elon be on the hook for the full amount should his partners drop?
Umm, no; I'm specifically referring to reasoning that a certain clump of symbols has the same meaning/effect as another one by linking semantics with symbol manipulation rules.
I wonder whether it would work to put that Max Mayer GmbH into a Lichtenstein Stiftung so that you can up and leave without paying exit taxes.
> But the fact is fathers could marry their daughters and mothers could marry their sons to avoid taxes before that law was passed, yet it wasn't done.

No fathers cannot marry their children. Nor can mothers. That is illegal in every state I believe.
Have you tried Rosetta? It can be pretty impressive.
Not sure what's complicated and time consuming about sharing zoom recordings. I frequently share those with my team and it usually comes down to copy/paste url and passcode into Slack or an email.
Sounds like elons going full republican
Because it's a complete nonstarter with the public (thanks to all the fiction like the Simpsons, Godzilla, etc) and the attack ads write themselves. Telling the public that they've been horribly mislead by their entertainment requires burning a LOT of money and political capital and isn't really worth it for any given politician.

Step 1 would basically be instilling Joe Q Public with an appreciation for quantification and if you can do THAT you've also solved a huge range of problems unrelated to nuclear power at the same time. This is also an _extremely_ difficult step that I'd expect to cost tens to hundreds of billions of dollars in education and propaganda.
You can/could modify the touchbar to get skip easily, see Keyboard settings
Just got an XPS 15 with i9-12900HK with Ubuntu 22.04 (5.18 kernel installed after the fact). Still working the kinks out, but the machine won’t reliably wake when the lid is opened. It’s about 10% faster than my M1 Pro, but with much worse battery life. If I didn’t still need an AMD64 machine for somethings, there’s no reason to put up with the quirks of a Linux laptop IMO.
An iPad + $270 keyboard + Apple Pencil is already more expensive than a MacBook Air.
Polyamory isn't illegal in most 'progressive' nations.
Logically I don't see how a n>2 person marriage would be more likely to be abusive than a two person marriage.
Solid Power begins solid-state battery pilot before testing with Ford and BMW
You're free to use your own definition for any word you like, but that's not what anti-intellectualism means to the rest of the world.

> Anti-intellectualism is hostility to and mistrust of intellect, intellectuals, and intellectualism, commonly expressed as deprecation of education and philosophy and the dismissal of art, literature, and science as impractical, politically motivated, and even contemptible human pursuits.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-intellectualism#Education...