skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I like that challenge.

Say, by analogy, what if another manager in a different situation, who made the 'cancel' decision on a talk, was concerned that the lecture they were being asked to approve was extremist? Then say, if Americans knew Hindu culture they might agree, just as they understand why they wouldn't invite their own untouchables to speak.

In this activist case, it's absolutely offensive to compare the Hindu untouchables with our untouchables because theirs are born into it where ours are just uneducated or indoctrinated and it would be such a grotesque insult to those people living in India, or anywhere in the world, that no serious person could even compare them out loud, and I'm even taking a considerable personal risk to write the comparison hypothetically.

But what if that's how that manager felt? How would "we" (progressive, though still mostly white, hegemonic We) respond to a speaker representing our own untouchables, and even though the comparison itself is so disgusting?

The steelman case for the protests and for the manager is that they are acting on convictions as strong and (they believe) principled as any of our own, however unjustly in this case. Even though they're wrong, until we understand their own complete revolt that caused them to take such a reckless stance in this case, there is no way to engage with them, or understand the source of the conflict. This isn't mere empathy or a "both sides,"-ism, as I don't think we can empathize with someone we fundamentally know is so wrong. However, I do think one can have compassion for everyone involved, and it is immensely difficult, as it requires imagining something you are truly revolted by, and then imaging what it would be like for someone like a Dalit friend or someone you loved to see you feel that way about them. The tension between the heartbreak at imagining their eyes in that moment and then also the feeling of what can only be described as disgust for people with the most offensive values, is I think, the compassion, where you feel both the revolt at being confronted with the very worst of the worst, and also what it feels like that no matter what you do and how much goodness you bring that you will always be an object of social disgust. This is why compassion is hard, but beautiful, but so very hard! Being able to do that suggests a greatness of soul to me.

The steelman case here isn't about pretending the broken logic of the protesting managers beliefs was somehow true, it's from asking, what if someone you loved or were responsible for felt one way or the other in this conflict about you? There is a basic misundertanding between two parts of a culture, where maybe these Brahmins don't trust the Dalits and the Dalits interpret that as contempt, which is returned by being provocative and giving the other just what they might expect? Bit of a homily, but in this sense, the steelman case shows how a specific kind of compassion might provide some future basis on which to establish both trust and respect, even if it's a very high bar.
> Yes, and sender reputation is part of it

Sender reputation where you block smaller email providers indiscriminately without weighting DKIM signatures or identity (or just blocking based on IP) is not a way of "handling" it. Your comment is akin to someone saying "the government can handle poverty" and you saying "yes, by killing all of the poor people" - it's very clearly a non-solution.

> Who do you think has to and can spend more compute or money, well-trusted Google or a small player?

I don't think that you understand how Hashcash is supposed to work, or what it's supposed to solve. The computational cost is imposed on non-Google players - both smaller email servers without a reputation (until they build one up, obviously), and spammers. I mean, sure, if everyone implemented the protocol, then non-Gmail servers could technically request that Gmail do Hashcash challenges in order to receive email, but nobody's going to do that, because nobody believes that Google is going to send spam mail.

> Though, I can promise you that on average SpamChimp would get to send a lot of spam for much less "HashCash" than a small player.

No, you really can't promise me this, unless you're literally in control of Gmail servers and intentionally adjust the difficulty settings to fulfill this condition.

> > is in fact incentivized to not accept email from non-Google domains.

> Everyone is.

I don't see what your point is here. The fact that Google is incentivized to not accept email from non-Google domains is not a good thing - it's a bad thing. And, really, the above is false - everyone is incentivized to accept legitimate, non-spam email from all of their customers, which is not the same as what you said.
Workstation and fusion were never big money makers. They were more of a labor of love.

I joined VMware just after the release of Businessware 2.0 - which I agree was 14 years ago.

The big money maker was vmotion because it allowed datacenters to decouple the server from the underlying hardware. Ever after, the money was in the datacenter products.
Kagi returns as the top two results:

* a Yelp page with the title "Top 10 Best 35mm Film in Los Angeles, CA", which seems to have the results you're looking for

* A reddit discussion where someone asks the exact same question, and gets some seemingly OK answers

The rest of the results are a mix of film rentals, film school, instructions on how to get a filming permit, etc.
Amos does deep dives on subjects. This is one such deep dive on Rust type system, it's limitations and why they exist.
Oracle Virtualbox is pretty good, and free for personal use. They also make patches available for their Oracle Linux kernel - the UEK, and in a better format than RedHat.
There are quite a few arguments against Proof of Stake, some of the most important are:

- PoS is more complex than PoW. This means that it is more likely to have security vulnerabilities that have not been discovered yet.
- PoS gives an unfair advantage to early adopters, the wealthiest users. Those who have a lot of coins will have a much higher chance of validating blocks than those who have few coins. This likely lead to centralization of the network.
- PoS is less secure than PoW. In a 51% attack [0], a malicious actor would need to control more than half of the coins in order to have a chance of validating more than half of the blocks. This is much harder to do than in a PoW system, where a malicious actor would only need to control more than half of the mining power.
- PoS could lead to inflation; if the price of the coin goes up, then those who have a lot of coins will be able to validate more blocks and earn more coins and could cause inflation if not properly managed.

Maybe the most important argument against it is that proof of stake requires users to have a certain amount of money staked in the network in order to validate transactions. This could lead to centralization if only a small group of people have enough money to participate in the validation process. Second, proof of stake coins typically require users to keep their coins locked up for a period of time in order to earn rewards. This could also lead to centralization as it would be difficult for new users to join the network and earn rewards.

The problem with Peercoin for example, a fork of Bitcoin using PoS, is that it relies on checkpoints - the blockchain blocks that have been verified by the network's nodes and agreed upon as the most recent correct blocks. So it's quite centralized.

[0] https://dci.mit.edu/51-attacks
Can you give me a link or something because I'm from Quebec and I have no idea what you're talking about.
Ideas Behind Their Time (2010)
>this site gives you the very metrics which every so called SEOer uses to game Google search results

Seems a little harsh. People would be trying to game the search results with or without the metrics.

They're just selling a shovel though. The ad industry and its money is the root cause behind the gold rush, not the shovel seller.
Not my experience at all. The problem with a “clean” “properly” designed database schema is handling migration and schema changes. Also, in an Enterprise environment, you end up having external systems relying on your schema, making it nearly impossible to upgrade the schema without breaking systems you don’t even know about until somebody shouts at you.
This is a terrible take. Why on earth would you trust a closed source, corporate solution more than FOSS sostare? The FOSS solution can be audited and the closed source solution can not. Your opinion is incorrect.
Absolutely. At least from Tamil Nadu (which alongside its neighboring state accounts for pretty much every famous Indian tech guy you might know) 30-40% (my rough estimate) of highly skilled immigrants would be Brahmin, the high caste.

It’s interesting why this happens, the people in this caste have to work harder to get Higher education due to quotas biased against them, and they’re not necessarily more well off either. It’s probably a mix of a focus on education and excellence in their families that compels the children to aspire this way, alongside a community that encourages this as well I suppose. Sad that recent decade has started to radicalize more and more of them (and other castes) due to a religious fanatic government among other things, I would have loved to understand more about what caused the extraordinary success of this community in producing this many talented individuals (like the Hungarian Jewish population did before WWII).
> The 120mm tank gun is the only weapon that can repeatedly blow up squads who are hiding inside of a house for example.

This seems to ignore the existence of the recoiless rifle, for example the Carl Gustav 84mm.

Once again, I think you're a waffler with no insight or experience in the topic at hand.

Your comments are so outlandishly ill-informed that I wonder if you're trolling?
It’s solving a very real problem for enterprises. They want to run local agents that serve up content with a cert chained to an installed trusted corp ca. In general localhost is a pain to reason about security-wise —- the best approach is to simply kill it (despite my personal nostalgic love for it.) Use a proxy instead and forget it exists — enterprise is now the owner of that domain.
Exactly right - you can get the GPL source for v1.0 which you've bought and paid for access to the binaries, but there's nothing that says they have to sell you binaries for v1.1, and thus you don't have any right to v1.1's source, despite it being GPL.
So no law change to require the police to do their job, no changes to provide any gun control. Just start fire fights in schools.

All so some compensating assholes can play weekend warriors and pretend that they’re Rambo. I bet something as minimal as tying gun ownership to signing up to be enlisted in the event of war would get rid of a bunch.
Their own papers: https://ohiocapitaljournal.com/2022/06/01/gop-lawmakers-pass...

Canada's (very) conservative press: https://nationalpost.com/pmn/news-pmn/crime-pmn/ohio-to-let-...

Right-wing newspaper: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2022/06/02/ohio-p...

Left-wing news: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/ohio-governor-to-sign-bi...

Mainstream news: https://www.10tv.com/article/news/local/ohio/ohio-house-pass...

Fox news: https://www.foxnews.com/us/ohio-teachers-carry-guns-training

satisfied?
How is that a bug?
Derivative work of a commercial product. Briefly mentions the FAIR USE Act of 2007, but that act never passed. Author is more or less banking on the fact that the company went bankrupt so who knows who owns the rights nowadays. Shouldn't impact anyone since it's basically just a curiosity, but just FYI.
Wouldn't Lima serve that role?

https://github.com/lima-vm/lima

If memory serves me right, it works with Podman.
A warehouse.
After some thoughts I believe I agree with you on both points.

A replicate but with new board and new chips for buyers to solder their own hardware would be really interesting and educational.

On the other side, I already have some retro hardware collecting dust so tonight I'm going to get one out to play CD music I just bought. Only vintage laptops have CD players installed.
Maybe but it is probably a good bet that after the drone attacks in Saudi Arabia there will be a lot of growth in drone defense.

Even just the single image of the Mercedes F1 car in front of the plume of smoke from the attack is too great for them to not ramp up defense.
The writing style of a formal letter to an executive versus a comment on an online forum is bound to be different. Not sure what your point is here.
I'm an Indian immigrant working in a large Bay Area Tech company and caste is definitely a thing. At another tech company I worked at the CTO and everyone under him i.e 4/6 VPs was Brahmin. An anecdote - I tried to get a position in the CTO organization and the first question his underling asked me was my full name. Now, corporate email already has your first and last name but he was fishing for my "caste" name. He also wanted to know were my parents were from. Now it's possible he wanted to find some common ground, but for people who are not from the upper castes and part of the inner circle. You don't know, if this question is going to be used to give you less preferential treatment.
I'm not saying the majority of upper caste folks discriminate, in fact I got my first job due to someone who was upper caste referring me. But there definitely are some bad apples. Based on my off the cuff discussion with other Indians, they've definitely noticed preferential treatment within Brahmins and certain upper castes especially when they make up the vast majority of the workforce (80%+)
> The average South Indian Brahmin is darker than the average North Indian Dalit. You can’t tell caste visually.

It sounds like you're saying the research paper I linked to is incorrect? Is there some evidence you could help to cite. Thanks.
I saw this happen in front of my last week. A new coworker said he was vegetarian and the other asked if he was always vegetarian (Brahmin’s are usually vegetarian). Then he asks “oh Bangalore? What part? I used to live there, I know it well.”

In addition to surname, these are all questions that can be used to gather details about someone’s caste.

Or so I’m told.
I've heard of caste discrimination during my second internship (in Europe, not in the US), so quite early in my career, from a "Yada"(??? Correction would be welcome here), concerning another collegue who came from a lower caste and how he was "lucky" not to be in the US or working with a "Bramin" or another elitist caste.
docker is far far far far from dead. I frankly do not seeing it going away for a looong time because it is generally a great and well supported product. Theres lots of information on issues and fixes and tons of developers using in across many large corporations
I also worked at a SEO company but not with a goal, although I also left there disgusted with the practice. The issue however (IMO) is that there's SEO at the article level and SEO at a strategic level.

At the article level, it is indeed mostly harmless, except when they catch some Google bias such as removing dates and edit notices from blog posts (because evergreen articles supposedly rank better), force a certain word count, H1/H2 count and paragraph size (which is why you get a life story before a recipe), or when it teaches you to disguise keyword stuffing and you get articles with semi-nonsensical paragraphs that can rank high. This is mostly annoying, though.

But IMO the biggest problem is SEO at a strategic level, which is what's done with the help of tools like Moz and Ahrefs. Websites often hire content agencies to make a large number of low-quality articles targeting popular searches that don't show too many results yet. Basically "balancing" demand/supply. But this practice puts non-SEO-optimized results at the bottom and replaces them with low-quality articles written by freelancers. This forces non-commercial publishers into bigger websites (like StackOverflow, Quora or Reddit). It also causes a lot of duplicate content, since those content agencies uses existing content from results as the basis for their own articles, only SEO optimized. The articles are of course rewritten so it's not word-by-word plagiarism. They also help evading Google measures to fix results. The latest trend when I was still in the industry was having unrelated companies helping each other do inorganic link-building by putting random links in more popular websites also controlled by those agencies, but that's probably old stuff by now.
There you go talking about that well-regulated militia again...
Async is a cancer that has spread from single thread languages like JS and Python. Its the wrong solution for multi-thread languages like Rust/Java/C++/Go.
I have done this previously using http://maperitive.net/ to download OpenStreetMap data and exporting roads as SVG or AI, then using Illustrator or Inkscape to clean up and print. Maperitive is a bit clumsy and hasn't been updated for years at this point, I think, but it's free and worked well for my purpose (which sounds like exactly what you're trying to do).
> Caste (varna) and jati are not about race. They’re culturally transmitted and not based on easily visible characteristics.

I mentioned in my other comment.

My understanding from a brief examination of published papers is the opposite.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285414433_Mapping_C... " Color and Caste Discrimination The belief in Aryan racial supremacy dominates social hierarchy practices in India.
The author has done a lot of work, but the title of this article is very misleading. There's no monitoring happening on the watch, it's just used
to display the results that are collected by another device.
Tell that to Tommy Tuberville. He seems to believe that being a senator is a way to get rich in a very dodgy manner.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/news/worl...
I certainly don't think people calling for that are anti-American,
Instagram Account Hacked – Phishing
Hi, my Instagram account was hacked today. I gave my cousin my login link and their account was also breached. The username, email and phone number was changed. I don't have any way of recovering my account. I've tried everything I can think of and wanted to share my experience in case someone has gone through the same thing. Also, if you know anyone in Meta that can help that would be great. I've gone through all the help center suggestions for recovery. Also, the email notifications I received when the changes were made had "recovery" links that never worked. I appreciate anyones help in advance.
Although my experience was at a mid-size startup, I know that emails to the CEO always ended up getting resolved quickly because he would forward them to the relevant team lead and they always got prioritized at the top of the queue. Not sure if that's the most efficient way to manage user issues, but works for the user who emails. Something to be said about the squeaky wheel getting the grease.
I worked on Wall St (actually had my own firm), and committed securities violations. I was stone guilty. Paid everyone back, but I had it coming. Lost everything: family, friends, all my considerable possessions, my freedom (fed prison for a couple of years). When I was released, I was destitute and homeless. But I discovered my calling in life: helping my brothers and sisters in and out of prison so that they might have the opportunity to lead a safe and productive life.
> It's not that I don't understand, I know how it won't.

You really don't understand it, because you're unable to provide counterarguments to specific explanations of how it would fit in with a larger anti-spam system, and because you say things that are clearly false to someone who does understand it.

> Great, so what's the point? Small players would have to pay Google to deliver mail :D

...such as this, which is false. Nobody's paying anybody anything - Hashcash is a computational proof-of-work challenge with zero money transferred.

If you're talking about a metaphorical "payment" of the smaller players having to do some kind of work - that's a feature, not a bug, because it allows the smaller players to invest effort into convincing Google that they're legitimate, and if coupled with a well-designed spam system that then takes that reputation and associates it with DKIM signatures/IP addresses, then the smaller players burn n cycles and then stop having to do so because they now have reputation with Google, while spammers burn n cycles continually for every message that they send because they keep getting flagged as spam.

> As I said in my other comment, either botnet devices can send tens if not hundreds of spam letters, or it's going to be slow and/or expensive for all the legitimate small senders. You really can't have both.

Yes, you really can, because you don't understand how anti-spam systems work. A system with Hashcash would start out assigning most IP addresses+hostnames/DKIM signatures with a reputation of 0, and in order to accept a message, would require the sender solve a Hashcash challenge inversely proportional to their reputation. If the message is marked as spam, the reputation takes a hit - if it's not, the reputation increases slightly (along with all of the other factors that an anti-spam system uses).

The legitimate servers quickly build up reputation and stop having to solve challenges, while the spammers pay the computational tax until the end of time, making it unprofitable for them to send most spam to most targets. The end.
While in general I'm tempted to agree with you, if anyone deserves it, it's probably telcos anyway.
A user agent must work for the user, not the server. Obeying the server over the user's intent is malicious design.

And if that makes it pointless, then just remove it entirely. Believe it or not, I've never seen a cert error in the wild that wasn't an expiration of a valid cert or a misconfiguration.

The boogeyman of MITM attacks which PKI certs protect from is used to justify a lot of terrible changes to the web that aren't reflected by reality: In most cases they're just going to hack the real server and serve malicious content from your valid certificate anyways. Or they'll trick someone into giving their credentials to bonkofamerica.com because people are easy to fool. Why MITM Amazon when people will happily treat an order email sent from a Gmail account as legitimate?
We don't process visitor location in any way at the moment. There is no local search on Yep yet.
But Nazi propaganda does cause Nazism. They called it redpilling, but it's clear on the chans anyway that means Nazism.
The longer I spend in IT/Software Dev, the more I see a dichotomy between Correctness and Usefulness. You can certainly have both, but different people concentrate on either correctness or usefulness. I think the future of software dev is people who understand both.
I had the same worries, but my Oracle account literally can't access any paid services. In fact, it's so bad that when your trial expires (you get some tryout credit) I couldn't even pay to continue operating if I wanted to, the resources had to be recreated from scratch!
Yes, you got it right, the “natch must be claiming to have a special car” is a bad take.

It’s more just that it really, really matters time-wise that the car is not charging up to full on any given stop,
because that means the charging stops are significantly faster.

People who latch on to the idea of judging EVs on their time to get “fully”‘charged are going to get such a distorted idea that they will never believe current EVs could be a good option. But, they would be mistaken.
It's Gravwell (gravwell.io). Depending on exactly what you're doing in Splunk, it could be a pretty easy transition, and we've even started writing tools to migrate data out of Splunk and into Gravwell. We've got a free 14GB/day community license if you'd like to play with it on your own, or you can email sales for a POC.
If it stops Wikipedia asking for donations I’m all in