skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If you need the stack space then there is no difference. The difference arises because if you preallocate all that stack space using worst case stack sizes and don't use most of it, you've wasted lots of memory.

Also there is a ton of nuance here like overcommitted pages and large address spaces which mitigate some of those downsides.
Uber Fires More Than 20 Employees in Harassment Probe (2017)
Some engineer checks in a customer’s personal data as a test fixture and it has to be purged from git history to be compliant with gdpr/ccpa.
Sandstorm.io is Docs-like in it's collaboration features. But the OP specifically discussed offline operation as an important functionality, so cloud-based collaboration tools without a local application may not fly.
I'm not sure when Git support was initially added to Trac, but TracGit 1.0 released in 2012.[0]

[0] https://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracGit
Thank you.

Really, the comment is underwhelming. Seems silly to hide it after it's grey already and annotated with all kinds of warnings.
Can Gitea be configured behind an AWS Load Balancer? I'd like to have the ALB to do OIDC authentication with Azure AD, and also take care of the SSL offloading (so that we can use ACM certificates).
This is happening in SF as well. Cooks and servers that live hours away because of housing prices and now the gas prices…
> I do want notifications for when my driver has arrived.

They can ring my doorbell or phone me.
If your tabs are 10µg but you've experienced ego death, does that mean you sometimes eat like 20 tabs in one sitting...?
The only logical buyer if Apple didn’t purchase them is either Motorola or IBM if they were to only be competitive in the embedded systems market. If they were never purchased given the rise of ARM processors they could have actually started making those for the mobile phone market instead and probably would have been competitive to Qualcomm .
>you’re treated to a low quality game

You're not only playing a modern Blizzard game, but a mobile one. This should go without saying. :p

>Two tracking and notification permission prompts

Is one of those the face tracking they put in there to satisfy Chinese government regulations?
In most cases there is no market for the digital assets from a loot box, and many game operators aggressively crack-down on anyone attempting to setup such a market. The digital assets from these loot boxes have no value. These are not lotteries or slot machines as these are currently defined in Nevada, which you quote.
Yes. Under DAFT you only get a NL visum, but you then can live and work anywhere in the EU. No, you need to show you invest in your company (or have a valuable profession), but not need to show a profit. Renewal is not an issue.

I must give the standard HN disclaimer though, I can't give legal advise in public, I can not give legal advise here without knowing your individual situation. Talk to you lawyer instead.

The whole point of the turnkey house+land+permits+visa+remote working+infrastructure package we make brochures, a community website and a Coop for is that you need legal support on top of the land buying, (off-grid) house building and electricity/fast internet, water recycling and remote working.
We can't give legal advise in public, we can just warn you that is complicated.
No, what it is is an acknowledgment that there are people who think rationally, and then there are those people who think you should fucking shut up and be burned at the stake for disagreeing with them. The idea that modern anti-theists are anything like our current theistic members of society is laughable, and honestly starting to make me wonder who cares if we turn into them.
50ug is half a hit, it's not a microdose at all.
The author maybe doesn't remember just how much trolling their used to be. There were so many news groups dedicated to trolling specific people. An example was net.loon.<name>. Joe Baptista and Rob Reilly were two that were often targets of trolling, as they themselves were notorious (but amusing) trolls. Sometimes people would be berated repeatedly and mercilessly just for the cardinal sin of asking a question that's been asked before. Online arguments would stretch over months, and many an outright physical threat was made.

Doxxing (which didn't have that name yet) was far more rampant then than it is today. People would literally gang up against you, collecting info until they have enough personal info to out you publicly, just for having the audacity to disagree with something, or adding an inconvenient bit of info to the thread.

Also sexism and racism was out in the open and unfiltered.

And it was a lot harder to block spam back then. There was so much of it!

The net was certainly fun, and very much a type of Wild West. Information was hashed out and shared freely, but that still holds today.

Those early formative years should not be looked back upon with rose tinted glasses. That's an absolutely incorrect view, since many of the good aspects persist to this day.
I'm pretty amazed they called Russia. It wasn't clear to me at that time that Russia would become an out and out gangster state, even if the economy had turned into an oligarchy by then. It wasn't until some years after Putin came to power, when it became clear he really was a gangster running a country.
https://www.youtube.com/c/CMUDatabaseGroup
I meet people who believe this about universal healthcare all the time. It’s a mystery why they think this because it never actually happened, and from Taiwan to the UK they got theirs by a government minister thinking “hmm today I will create universal healthcare”. The implementation problem there wasn’t “the ruling class”, it was bribing doctors who were afraid of getting paid less.

The focus on protesting is a meme from the US New Left combined with modern activist brain; “organizers” think they’re doing something by “organizing” people into getting arrested in public because it worked once for civil rights. But of course it doesn’t do anything and everyone just ignores you.
A healthy reminder that these articles are generally sponsored by the company developing the specific drug.

Cancers will be mostly treatable within our lifetimes though (in many cases already are). All the pieces are there technology wise.
Have you ever heard from someone saying that gender or color shouldn't matter? Sometimes they don't even just propose equality of opportunity but even equality of outcome. When it comes to the poor and their fair chance you get to watch a ridiculous spectacle where all the arguments you just heard a minute ago are turned on their head. Suddenly there are reasons why those people are in that situation and it's usually their fault - didn't work enough, study enough, picked a job that has no value, picked a job anyone can do, etc.

But the reality is that it's not that the job has no value, or anyone could do it. If your trash sat in front of your house for weeks you'd pay them a yearly salary just to take it away. They get abuse because they have no choice. Somehow they ended up on that bottom rung of the ladder and society made it close to impossible to get up from there.

If you want to solve other types of discrimination you intrinsically accept that the abusers will pay for it. Your board is all white men? Some will have to pay the price for centuries of abuse and make room for other genders or people of color. If you are looking for such equality you will have solid arguments to justify getting it. Until it comes to poor people and then nothing else matters, they're poor for a reason, why should you pay for lifting them up?

So I'll say there's no brush broad enough to paint this with. It has been almost universally proven throughout recorded history, it has happened all over the world to varying degrees: the world needs a bottom rung to do what nobody else even wants to think about. It will make sure that bottom rung keeps existing in ample supply to achieve that and it will abuse those people because it can. It's the one universal discrimination where the power balance is so one sided it's absolutely ridiculous. It doesn't care about gender, race, religion, if you're poor you will pay for it in ways you never though exist, you will be forced to subsidize the well being of those better off. And those better off will find justifications to not do much, if anything, about it.

Maybe you aren't one of those people. But you did have to ask with surprise which makes me think you never even noticed or ever really wondered.
Are they talking about that in Denmark for people who work at 3 star Michelin restaurants?

It seems like this is an irrational industry you go into for aesthetic reasons rather than a normal job.
The thing is, "upward of" denotes a lower bound, not an upper bound.
> fire-and-forget

This term disturbs me. Is there really an encoded idealism that says, "just start taking a dose of X" and forget about it? Or am I just misunderstanding this?

No follow up therapy? No behavior modification? No treatment protocol? When do you ever get to a point where you're no longer consuming therapeutics, or is that the end game? Just find the right one and take it forever?

> with Ketamine as well

A known side effect is long term bladder damage. This is precisely the reason I find the logic of "fire-and-forget" around these drugs disturbing.
I have heard the tourism argument before. But does anyone really visit the UK because of the royals? Sure, they go to see the castles and the royal whatever, but no one goes to the UK expecting they are going to see or much less meet a royal do they?
I found the monoprice dark matter to work well for me, but I would say I have “medium to large” hand size for most males.

https://www.monoprice.com/product?p_id=37991
Fossil has a 'purge' command for this purpose, though it's marked as a work-in-progress.
I've read there are FDA-approved places where you can get LSD therapy for depression. Does it really work?
Huh? I use LibreOffice frequently on macOS without any crashing at all. Is this a common issue?
Playing the original Deus Ex echoes that. There was some anxiety about some looming collapse of society into terrorist/criminal anarchy.
that may be true but I didn't question his altruism at all, I commented on the alleged anti-materialism.
Kids aren't allowed to play real world slot machines either, are they?
This is sadly still left to be seen
Not if you discount hydro electric. We have to store the wind and solar and then be able to use it. We have the water pump idea where they pump the energy into water that is released at night in Virginia. We hear of melted salts as a means to create steam after dark.

Nuclear is really our only viable solution to get rid of carbon based energy, but that ship has sailed in most of Europe and no one is ready to finance a new plant in NA.
I wonder what happened to the pearwood movable type; it would also be interesting to see the glyphs rendered digitally, as svg files or some kind of font format.
nothing, for sure. 100% don't do anything.
> However I still don't feel confident gauging how much placebo effect is part of it.

Me neither. All I know is that the substance is extremely powerful, and beneficial if applied correctly.

> But in the end, does it matter how it works if it helped change habits?

:)
Air Leakage at Electrical Switches and Outlets (2013)
lol, the article talks about how nice it is to have a self hosted GUI for your SCM. There are a lot of those for git too, but they ignore that fact.
> On the other hand trying to help any of these people is quickly branded as socialism (or worse, communism)

I get your sentiment, but I personally think you’re off base here.

You seem to be demonizing the other side a bit and implying they don’t want to help these people.

Is it so hard to believe that some members of society genuinely believe that welfare programs hurt this group rather than help them in the long run?

I’m not asking you to agree with that sentiment - I’m not even saying it’s correct - I’m simply pointing out that many of the people against socialism and communism do genuinely believe that their viewpoints will help these people in the long run.
Mind if I ask how you're hosting this setup, are you using something like k8s or swarm? If so how are you handling persistence, just normal volumes? I imagine if you were to lose data, that'd be pretty bad.
Not sure if these work (I would assume it does work often enough to get approval from FDA?) but majority of studies I saw using psychedelics used regular or "hero" doses, not microdosing. So it is quite different from the topic of this study.
Candles, flags and a howl of pain: Taiwan remembers Tiananmen
I don't know your situation. I personally feel I've been given a lot of advantages that other people didn't get. And yet, I'm not a billionaire. It's easy for me to set unreachable standards for myself, and feel ashamed about not meeting them. A book called "Daring Greatly" by Brene Brown helped me understand some of this. I was pretty pissed off and generally drinking too much. Anyway, It sounds like you're having a hard time continuing. I'd encourage you to give the book a read if my situation feels anything like your own.
Anyone who tries to infer something from the writing should always remember about a blue curtains.
You can have a complicated system that spends its complexity "budget" on redundancy and/or protection mechanisms. This means that when A fails, B keeps things working, and when B fails, C does. And so the system just keeps going, with B failed, and F, and K, and Q and X and Z. And maybe nobody (or very few people) notice that there's all these failing subsystems adding up.

And then A fails, but hey, it's still running great!

And then C fails. And the system collapses, because A, B, and C all failed. And everybody thinks that it collapsed quickly, because nobody thinks of the collapse as starting when B failed.

TL;DR: A complex redundant system can run for a long time in a partially-failed state. If you measure only from the start of full failure, you can miss how long the collapse took.
I hear a lot of larger teams insist on squash commits for PRs. Fossil isn't a fan of squashing.
GM’s Cruise Wins the Race to Charge for Driverless Rides
I've never heard of this. Are you sure you're not mixing it up with Ketamine therapy clinics?
It probably means little, but I’m sorry you are going through this.
The company my wife works for is using LibreOffice entirely. Said company is a national retail service, focused on books and school related consumables, with around 40 stores opened throughout the entire country. And is using this since at least 2017, the year my wife went to work for them, possible since their beginnings in early 2000's, but I'm not sure since I haven't asked.

When she started to work for she asked me if we have LibreOffice on our computers because she had to edit some documents she took from work. I was pleasantly surprised to learn that they relied on LibreOffice for document management. Nowadays LibreOffice is installed on all our home computers alongside Microsoft Office as well. She can switch to whatever she finds easier and I taught her to always convert her documents to .RTF to be sure she has no problem switching between home and work.
Inside feature branches it can be quite useful. To fix the history, squash things, …
Perhaps the pointlessness is intentional. The religions and philosophies of Dune bear little resemblance to modern-day religion, as though in 20k years only the names have remained unchanged. Zensunni in particular seems to mostly reference Zen buddhism style meditation, although there are also calls to prayer.
Two books! With “More Programming Pearls” as the second also from him. Fun books.
> [...] the biggest spender thus far is Sam Bankman-Fried, the billionaire co-founder of the FTX exchange. [...] Overall, he’s pumped in about $32 million, 75% of the industry’s total [...] Bankman-Fried said his political agenda extends well-beyond crypto regulation, and his spending is now primarily focused on pandemic preparedness. [...]

>The FTX CEO has used a super political action committee known as Protect Our Future for most of his spending. While several Democrats supported by that PAC have won primary contests, its biggest outlay of $11.4 million failed to boost Oregon Democrat Carrick Flynn, a political newcomer who ran on increasing readiness for a pandemic.

Based on this, it seems safe to conclude that this is less "entire industry massively lobbying for favorable regulations" and more "a crypto billionaire splashing money around for causes he wants to support".
So is this presented as "evidence" to suggest there was an attack on Luna, that its depegging into a death spiral was intentional by some person or group of people?
Is that how they do placebo controlled studies? I thought they would tell all participants they had received a genuine dose.
Indeed, the article mentions they explicitly refrained from setting those expectation precisely because they affect the results.

“We removed any expectations that this was a psychedelic drug,” de Wit explained. “Because in the real world, people’s expectations can strongly influence their responses.”

The goal is to know whether the drug itself actually leads to improved mood & cognition, without any prior bias. I don’t know why you’d want to include expectational effects. Why is a placebo controlled study not well suited? If you don’t have a control group, you can’t know if the results are due to the drug, or due to hopes or “contact high” as they put it.
it doesn't have to be that long .... VisiCalc, the first "killer app" collapsed about a year after Lotus 1-2-3 was released.
There are already reasons that are illegal (i.e. member of a protected group that you can't descriminate against.) for ”Christian Mingles” to use to bad someone.

I am not proposing any further restrictions on what reasons an be provided to ban people.

I do think that plaforms that encourage people to become invested in them (email providers, social networks, online media "sales” patforms, etc) should have a legal obligation to explain the reasons for the ban and provide the banned user the opportunity to correct any incorrect information that led them being banned.

I don't know if a standardized arbitration process, and expansion of the civil court system, or something entirely different is the best way to approach this.

You tone comes off as very combative, like you are looking for a fight and making assumptions about my political stances that are both incorrect and detract from your ability to have a conversation.
Similar experience for me. I bought the no ads version of plants vs zombies- “no ads” was even in the title. A few years later EA changed the app name and added ads.
60 - 200 ug is listed as a trip dose in TiHKAL. 50 ug is subjectively quite different from 100 ug. It’s enough to warrant a distinction from a full dose, whatever you want to call that.
Universal healthcare and workers' rights are two completely different things, the latter of which was won in Europe post WW2, through protests, and fears of communism spreading, not through the ideas of politicians.
Weeeeeeeeell.....

Birth rates are below replacement levels in most Western countries.
I worked in fine-dining for several years before reaching a point where I had to make a choice to sacrifice everything for my dream, or take care of myself and give up on the dream. I saw many things that contribute to the rampant alcohol and drug abuse.

1. You work obscene hours. The industry standard for fine-dining is to work 60+ hours a week, and you're on your feet pretty much 90% of it. Also, you're only getting payed around 35k a year with minimal benefits, although this is changing somewhat in the last few years. Drugs and alcohol are just kinda needed by most people to cope with the stress.

2. You work odd hours. Most fine-dining restaurants close around 11 pm, which means you'd get out somewhere between midnight and 1 am. There's nothing else to do when you get out besides go to another bar or restaurant and get wasted. Also, since you work in restaurants, you know other people that work in bars/restaurants. Thus, when you go out to other bars/restaurants, you usually know people who hook it up in terms of drinks. I went to so many bars after work where we'd get "industry discounts" and literally pay like 20% of the listed price.

3. You're surrounded by it. This is one of the most important ones in my opinion. When I worked in restaurants, it was very common for wine vendors to pop in during our prep periods and say something like, "Hey, we just got a special shipment of wine from this fancy place in Italy. Here's the pricing and a free sample bottle for you guys to try out!" Or your boss comes in one day and says, "Hey, this beer isn't selling so you guys should just drink this keg before it goes skunk on us," and now suddenly, there's a free, half-full keg in the walk-in. A lot of what prevents me from drinking is that I'm just lazy and it's expensive, but if someone is going to bring me booze for free to me on a regular basis, you better believe I'll be getting drunk on a regular basis too.

4. The people it draws. Restaurants are known for being pretty lax when it comes to background checks so it shouldn't be a surprise to anyone when you get people who have more clandestine backgrounds.
> The only mistake the OP made was in acting like they hadn’t seen the question before

This. Everyone in the thread is claiming no wrongdoing on the part of the author. If I was in this position, I would excitedly inform the interviewer that I had seen the question before and then quickly write down the answer. But that would look be a lot less impressive than OP’s acting as he pretended to come up with the perfect answer on the fly.
I've always liked Steve McConnell's writing, and Joel Spolsky is excellent.
You say it's an ugly hack, but our +0.8% profit margins speak for themselves!
Reading that today, at the moment when Ukraine is at war with Russia, when post-Brexit EU internally struggles to present a unified front and when global food supply seems to have become a subject to a gamble, it may seem that parts of those predictions look accurate.

But, on the other hand isn’t it “just more of the same” of what was going on in 1997, be it turned up a notch? I’m too young to remember, but I feel the world hasn’t changed fundamentally after 1997 (though the local perception may have been different due to events like 9/11 etc.). See what’s trending now, extrapolate, amplify?
The book is "Improving almost anything - Ideas and essays" and can be found on Amazon, but I think the Wiley description [0] does it more justice. His writing is accessible and full of witticisms such as "When Murphy speaks, listen" (referring to Murphy or Sod's Law). His works are good building blocks for all kinds of research.

[0]https://www.wiley.com/en-gb/Improving+Almost+Anything%3A+Ide...
I feel like these abuses in the workplace happen especially in industries where workers overestimate the romance of the job: fashion models, talk TV shows, science at famous places.

The huge demand for even unpaid internships at these places allows employers to abuse their workers without penalty.

Maybe the thing to look out for when finding an industry worth joining is to ask how the interns and fresh grads are treated.
I feel like an SCM would have to be WAY better than git to make it worth using. The entire developer community is on git, so you are still going to have to know how to use git in order to access other open source projects. If you are already going to have to be using git for many things, why add a second SCM you have to learn to use?
I don't have any specific recommendations to give you, but skim through an operating systems text book, or college course that puts its slides and whatnot online, when it comes to kernel context switching. It'll give you an idea of what kind of work a kernel must do when context switching between threads and processes, and why userspace multitasking can be more efficient.