skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I really like the aim of this, but I have a hard time following the terminology, despite being someone who preaches and teaches functional core/imperative shell.
Google is well known for hoarding/warehousing talent, and this is exactly how they find compliant employees, not competent ones.
reads blog post

Yeah, I’ll give it a shot.

clicks link to felt.com

clicks link that says “Try Felt free”

prompted to “Sign up for Felt”

Oh, no thanks.
I don't really understand what this is?
On my Subaru if the sensors are blocked, for instance with ice, it disables the controls.
I'm really enjoying the current retrocomputer craze. I bought the "TheC64" myself (full size with working keyboard, wouldn't have it any other way), which is just a C64 lookalike case with a tiny ARM computer running VICE inside. I know it's not a real C64, but it sure looks like one!

The Mega65 in particular is not for me though: it's way too expensive and it's not an actual computer I owned as a kid, so the nostalgia factor is lower. It does look extremely nice, though.
Is it still the case that Amazon gives new hires a hiring bonus that has to be paid back if they don't stay at the company for a set amount of time? If you're also targeting fresh college grads...

That's not exactly indentured servitude but it's too close to the Island of Pleasure (Pinocchio) for my comfort.
Can you put some tape over the sensors?
Careful though. Do your reading and make sure you understand those contracts. At least understand how to roll them and how exercising works. You’ll need 100x shares of whatever you’re protecting to have the contracts match 1:1
When you SSH into something, you type, for example, 'vim' into the terminal, and then you're running the remote version of vim on that machine.

If however, you want to use your local version of vim, you can do that too. With the previously mentioned kde tools.

Is it something different than that?
Last sentence of the article:

> Tesla did not reply to a request for comment, nor has it since 2019 when it dissolved its PR department.
It is easier to capture CO2 when using it at a plant to produce electricity than when burning it in a stove.
The downvotes without comment have me curious. My assumption is that these are coming from people who do the same thing with their own product, and don’t appreciate the cost their customers pay for this development methodology.

Meanwhile, my Sonos system’s audio has been dropping out repeatedly for the past month because they keep shipping buggy updates I don’t need, but am forced to install.
Even it is true, the practical usage of this finding is limited.

First, I don't think you can measure candidates' "narcissism".

Second, if a narcissist executive gets hired, it might because he/she has other advantages over other less-narcissist candidates.
The social effort required to leave into a 15 s statement is so high that you would not have done that. Why make grandiose claims about things you won't do? Like, you're telling me no one has ever said anything absurd to you and you've stayed? Bullshit.
A grade-separated (ie tunnel) system for autonomous vehicles would be one such method.

Government can certainly assist in this, but industry is usually better at coming up with better standards which the government can then deploy
It's kind of funny that you think removing features from a cycling computer is the dangerous part, when we know from pretty much every other situation involving potentially dangerous tasks and computers it's the introduction of the device in the first place that creates most of the danger. Why would you even glance at a map while going 50 miles per hour on a bicycle?
Switzerland is a very lucrative market, I don't think they will leave.
> Humanity has experienced twice just how much damage a nuclear reactor blowing up can cause

We haven't, really. We were quite lucky.

What if the Chernobyl disaster had reached the Pripyat river, and in turn contaminated the Dnieper? We are all familiar with them geography of Ukraine now.

What if a radioactive cloud from Fukushima had reached Tokyo?

What would have been the cost of a temporary evacuation of Tokyo?
disrupt thyself.
I think the takeaway should be that autopilot cannot be generalized. You can't say it's better or worse under all situations than an average driver. Sure there are situations that it's clearly better or worse than an average driver like driving on a pretty straight freeway for hours long or driving on a twisty road without clear lane markings.

The problem arises with ambiguous situations like phantom breaking. Is it phantom breaking because the tree overhangs are too close to the surface of the road, the sun is shinning directly into one of the cameras or is there smudge on the camera lens? For this category of problems we're likely to see both improvements and further regressions. The ambiguity will bifurcate into clearly worse and clearly better than average human driver categories. This is the part we need patience for the technology to improve.

The clearly worse than human driver category may be an intractable set of problems and that's what we should judge viability of self-driving technology base off of.
Slow in the same way that the conservative stack scanning was bound to leak. I did actually run Emacs with it after experience elsewhere.

Edit: I wonder how Boehm is somehow "most conservative", compared with, say, the Memory Pool System which I'd also look at these days but wasn't an option then.
Radar is only turned off if you are accepted into the full self driving beta and turn it on. Then it switches over to full vision.
Counter thought here. Isn't there a risk of divulging and sharing information and then said narcissistic executives can scoop up that information and leverage up the chain of command? It's similar to the tragedy of the commons but around knowledge and power. It's also a zero sum mentality.
Awesome! Thanks for following up! :D
If the accelerator pressed at all, it wont break automatically. Not sure if you're pressing it or just hovering on it, but that might be why.
> How exactly does it work and what do you do?

Local VSCode attaches to a remote VSCode backend. So you see the remote file system, remote shells and remote extensions running in the local editor. This works for both remote hosts and containers and is cross platform; you can develop on a remote Linux host/container using your Windows desktop, for example. This is invaluable for developing inside containers with isolated tooling, for instance.

It isn't fragile; it just works and is so transparent that it's easy to get confused about where you're actually working.
You can see this in actuarial data that the IIHS posts. Often, cars that perform comparably in crash tests have wildly different real world loss rates. The difference is likely explainable by differences in driver behavior.

For example, look at any car also sold under a hybrid trim model, the hybrid almost always has lower rates of injury. For an identical chassis.

Or, consider the brands that have good crash test rating, but target subprime buyers.... in comparison to brands that have similar crash performance but target higher incomes and/or higher credit profiles. Nissan and Kia vehicles often have good crash test ratings, but they consistently have bad real-world crash data.

https://www.iihs.org/ratings/insurance-losses-by-make-and-mo...
Upwork freelancers have almost total freedom in deciding whether to accept a job or not, the contract terms, rate, and lots more. There's very little in common between them and Uber drivers.
Why are you asking? Is there a relation between spam handling and usage of S/MIME?
Firefox doesn't support Speech Recognition API yet :/ https://caniuse.com/?search=speech%20recognition
Deterrence only works if people actually believe they might be punished, which this demonstrates they won't.
My loss isn't as big as this but I've gotten some Paypal disputes because those users didn't get any of the welcome emails (for a rather costly purchase). My issue has been more with Apple's mail for some reason though.

Thankfully all my customers have been super understanding and were kind to take the disputes back once they were able to locate the emails in the Spam folder. Also I finally decided to just use a "reputed" smtp server to fix my problems (feels like extortion but what can you do).

I've written this before, but it's so sad that something so important and vital like email is so broken and we are the mercy of corps like Google/Apple/Microsoft and everyone has their own secret policy.
Wouldn't content moderation be "last one in a human centipede"?
My guess is fewer but there would be more murders
I have a 2021 one and it never hit the breaks with nothing standing in the way. I don't have the manual in front of me but IIRC, it should only activate without an actual obstacle if the circumstances are such that something may be confused for an obstacle (e.g., driving down a steep enough hill that the end of it may be detected as a wall, never happened to me but I've never done more than 25 deg slopes).

I know you're not asking for advise but I'd recommend to have that checked, my recollection is that the manual spends far more pages listing the circumstances under which the system may fail to apply the brakes than those in which it may break when it didn't have to, so it seems odd enough for me that I'd get that checked if it happened to me.
> we need someone to figure out safe self driving before the effort is halted and humanity has to wait a century before a new generation tries again (like with nuclear tech today).

That's quite the leap.

A far more reasonable statement would be 'we need someone like Ralph Nader to spearhead initiatives to regulate self driving cars to prevent the disasters we saw in automobile safety in the 1950s-1960s.'
> it's dangerous and it should be done carefully and skillfully, but..

the OP's original complaint was that the feature removal created the danger, so I'm glad you state that the act is already dangerous.
Warning: slightly off topic

I don't know if others are doing the same, but I'm trying to wean myself off of vscode/vscodium in favor of neovim. My main issues with vscode are bugs and performance. The vscode undo history constantly gets corrupted, performance with large files is terrible, extensions can be a mixed bag, vim integration is not consistent and performance in general is sluggish.

On the other hand, I've been trying out Lunar vim and it has feature parity with vscode and suffers from none of the issue I mentioned. My only issue is taking the time to learn how to do a dozen or so operations that I have not investigated in Lunar Vim yet. Lunar vim is blazing fast when paired with Alacritty. Once I get around to filling the final few knowledge gaps I have, I'm done with vscode.
Not to mention the loss of voting rights once you’ve been convicted of a felony. Completely broken.
I see it something akin to the smart tv market where you buy the hardware but it also collects and uses data about everything you watch. The data collection aspect allows them to sell you that tv for less than they would if it were a "dumb" tv.
If you're at C-level at a company of Tesla's size, you are still a person, just compensated as though you were 50 persons. That is going to change how you're perceived, like it or not.

Everyone is judged on the basis of their actions, not their words. When you're a CEO managing 10 people, you feel the weight of every firing. When you can tell your lieutenants "slash headcount by 10%", you don't feel the weight as much. It's the difference between hand-to-hand combat and firing a drone missile from a command center thousands of miles away.
I was driving to Las Vegas with my father (in my Model Y) and I was telling him, "I've never experienced this so-called phantom braking..." A literally 3 seconds later I experienced it and few times later in the next hour or so.
Thank you Steve. There is so much misinformation surrounding rust it's unreal...

It's also kind of normal to you know tweak a language so it integrates with an OS better... Even if they did change their allocator, who cares?
Sounds like an old topic, "capitalism", which has has a deep history and has been studied extensively. Using the term "executive narcissism" provides an excuse to exhume old (stolen) arguments and present them as new academic fodder to the great unwashed masses.
"Tell me about a time when" is the bottom of the barrel for interview questions. I have never had a good interview experience that included that particular question.
> s he awaited sentencing following a pleading guilty to one felony, Gumrukcu attended the Nasdaq bell ringing ceremony for Enochian, likely with permission from his probation officer. He was praised as Enochian’s “scientific founder” at the ceremony.

Does NASDAQ have any rules preventing major shareholders from listing if they are actively being investigated or literally on probation? Shouldn't this be a thing? Do they not background check major shareholders of companies trying to list? An alleged major reason big exchanges have valuation requirements for companies to meet the list is to prevent this kind of thing.
That's not even mentioning that you can simply by steel discs the size of the burner and use whatever kind of cooking vessel you like.
I can't read the actual article, but the summary implies a distinct lack of understanding of a Narcissistic Personality Disorder. The issue is more that the NPD lives in a fantasy world and compulsively must "prove" that they are better than everyone, or more specifically the compulsively try to break others down. It's completely about power and the ability to trigger negative and traumatizing emotions in others.
Reminds me of Netflix's Culture page[1], "Selflessness[...] *You seek what is best for Netflix, not yourself or your team."

I don't know who thought this was a good idea to write, but I'm a professional who provides services for a fee, and that's the mentality that I find appropriate in a business exchange, not creating an air of worship culture.

[1]: https://jobs.netflix.com/culture
Interesting and very curious. Honestly, I can understand your hesitancy to publish because of the pearls-before-swine problem. However, I promise not to read in any way other than curiosity. If you add your email to your profile or use the one in mine, I'd be happy to converse.
Yeah absolutely. Dropper posts are a total game changer, don’t know how you could think they’re gimmicky
Yes, it is often pedantry and not offered in good faith, but in fairness, the legal definition of "monopolization" requires that you either have a monopoly (defined, loosely, as a high-enough marketshare), or, if accused of
"attempted monopolization", that you have a dangerous chance of achieving a monopoly. As you note, that requires defining the "relevant market."
Besides the plows and grit, this CBC article claims the paint they choose has something to do with it:

> Most of the paint is environmentally friendly but being water-based, it rarely lasts more than a year, especially on the province's busiest roads and highways.

> "The paint used for highway striping eventually wears down as a result of the wear and tear from vehicle traffic as well as the effects of necessary winter maintenance activities," said a spokesperson with the Department of Transportation and Infrastructure.

> The provincial government only uses oil-based paint in cold weather. The bulk of road work is completed during the summer months, so it seems unlikely many fresh painted lanes this year will survive the winter.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/disappearing-ro...

I'm not sure about the paint composition matter, but at least I can attest to the road lines in Canada being very poor. I've driven most of the Trans-Canadian Highway (all of it west of Quebec) and the line paint was virtually nonexistent for much of even this road.
What I'm 'driving at' (hehe) here is that there's a lot of daylight between what the math says, and what people are likely to accept.

We are, for better or worse, somewhat comfortable with the fact that a human driven semi truck will occasionally wipe out a minivan.

It's not clear to me at all that we as a society are, or will ever be comfortable with a computer-operated semi-truck doing the same.

No amount of "Well, the number say this truck is statistically safer when driven by a computer..." will move the needle on that, IMO.
> They should give drivers a simple way to notify Tesla exactly when phantom breaking happens

Even assuming that Tesla will review all the cases, it’ll be likely useless. They just try to throw ML at whole problem e2e, and that’s what you end up with. Solid performance for 90% of the cases, ok for 5% and absolutely bonkers for last 5%. That’s just how modern ML works, you’ll never get complete solution, and will be always chasing edge cases. That works ok for showing ads, less ok for driving deadly machines.
Shellenberger covers it well in sanfransicko. Here's a quoted excerpt/article about it: https://www.americanexperiment.org/housing-first-vs-shelter-...

Housing first doesn't work, shelter first probably does.
> Those games only make at least a bit of sense when everybody enters their crush and only when matching both get notified.

Even then, among heterosexuals they will suffer from the same problem as basically every software platform for romance among straight people: the massive asymmetry in interest between men and women. Men would copy and paste virtually every woman they know into the system as a "crush," so they can find which if any of their female acquaintances might be interested, and then they would decide who to pursue.
It's easy to add "legs" to the C-R device - a few dollars at most in wood dowels and no tools, for example. Maximizing filter area is really important because flow vs static pressure for a fan like this is usually logarithmic...and static pressure rapidly rises as the filters get used (their efficiency goes up, but flow drops.) That's one reason you see a lot of squirrel fans used in air filtration units; they can generate much more static pressure.

In theory, if you mounted it fan-down and placed some towel or blankets underneath, you could also dampen a fair amount of the noise coming from the fan.

It's probably more effective and cheaper to get thicker filters. A 20x20x5 filter has five times the filter surface area of a 20x20x1 filter, but costs $36 - about 2-3x as much as a 20x20x1. Two 20x20x5 filters would provide twice the filter surface area.

But...these solutions were all intended mostly for emergency situations where purpose-built air filtration units were in really constrained supply. Folks should really just buy a regular air filtration unit that uses much less electricity and is quieter, especially if it auto-adjusts speed depending upon need.
> I don't disagree that corporations are blameworthy by lobbying against climate change legislation. That said, you're changing the topic here. The entirety of that sentence was about the "lack of climate-friendly options" and the comment I was replying to was talking about "a society where carbon emissions are unavoidable".

I don't see how I'm changing the topic. As you noted, the original topic was "corporations and institutions that created a society where carbon emissions are unavoidable and onto personal lifestyle choices". You seemed to be arguing that the landscape of goods and services is carbon intensive because consumers demand cheap products irrespective of climate concerns. I'm rebutting that with "consumers don't have the information to choose between climate and cost, they can only compare costs". Specifically, I noted (or rather implied) two ways to facilitate that information: require every product to publish information about its carbon footprint (with accountability mechanisms) or just price it into the cost of the item via carbon tax or similar.

> Is this really an issue? Just assume anything that doesn't have strongly worded environmental claims is not environmentally friendly. Given that a supermajority of consumers care about the environment (at least in the abstract), if a product is actually environmentally friendly, it's probably going to be predominantly labeled.

Yes, because "strongly worded environmental claims" is meaningless. There's no accountability that products making these claims outperform their competition at all, and even if they do outperform the competition, a consumer can't know by how much (am I paying 50% more for a product that emits half as much carbon, or only 1% less?). There's virtually no regulation here.
I wouldn't call their responses rude, but they are somewhat dismissive.
"I guess it’s kinda like when Calvary first started to fall from its throne ..."

I hope it is useful and interesting for you know:

Calvary is where Christ died.

Cavalry are the guys on horses.
I wonder if DARPA et al will decide that the leaks are just the price they pay for having soldiers spend their free time fooling around in simulators with tanks they actually operate.
The modern power plants with combined cycle have an efficiency of up to 65%.

The power plants with heat cogeneration have an efficiency of up to 80%.

I doubt very much that even half of the energy consumed by burning gas ends inside the cooking pot in most cases.

Regardless of the energy efficiency or pollution risk of gas stoves, there are people who prefer other cooking methods just because they like their results better.

Even if I have a gas stove and I continue to pay for gas as if I would use it, because I live in a condo and there is no individual metering, I have stopped using the gas stove several years ago.
Achaea
It also helps to get some experience working in a non-engineering role to broaden your perspective. An MBA isn't essential but can be helpful in teaching at least the basics of finance, accounting, law, marketing, and communications so that you can have productive discussions with those colleagues.
Chill dude it’s Friday. Touch some grass
How It Feels to Build a Video Game and Watch It Die
That is an option, or if you don't want to deal with a GC because it's eating 70% of your clock cycles under load you can use rust get performance gains and still be writing safe code...
> Basically I now prepare fake stories before hand.

I think interviews these days expect you to do prep before the interviews. Reciters even give you a list of these before hand. People practice (semi)fake answers to these and get the job.
marriages have been ended when those don't produce the same value for n
> Which, in this age of cheap ubiquitous dash-cams, isn't nearly as likely to be the "inconvenient waste of time but zero financial risk" deal it used to be

Chance of permanent injury or death is not negligible. e.g. get rear ended by a semi, or just suffer from whiplash that doesn't go away.
Fair enough! I think in general this topic gets brought up too much since most people do drives like that rarely if ever, but if you do then an ICE vehicle or hybrid might still be your best option.
More bugs flying closer to the Summer?

I guess that would fit "bug" definition?
Other factors I'm sure PG&E is considering:

* Cost to extend the operating license of the plant. The NRC will likely mandate modifications be made in order to keep the plant running safely for another 20-40 yers.

* Public Relations. There's strong public opposition to nuclear power. PG&E already has a poor image in California. Closing the plant would be expected to generate some goodwill toward PG&E.

* Soaring insurance costs/increased liabilities. California has made it abundantly clear to PG&E that if Diablo were to have any problems affecting the public in any manner whatsoever then they are totally on the hook for the financial impacts. Look at what happened with the wildfires caused by arcing transmission equipment. Now imagine the costs associated with a nuclear "incident." That's simply too much risk.

Between the high financial risk and decreased dispatch that's a one-two punch that makes continued operations untenable.