skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Neon is actually easily replaced. It's everywhere in the atmosphere.

Except its not easy to build new supply in the short term.

> I agree that the world hinges on Taiwan right now.

Taiwan is safe unless Biden slips and says something too aggressive. China needs chips just like the US and they're stuck with the same sources. They won't take it over so long as their takeover destroys the fabs. The US the EU and CN are all trying to build domestic chip supply. While it probably won't be top-tier, it should be "of this decade" in quality. Thats enough to keep the economy alive in US and CN even if its setback.

> Putin caught Europe in an energy checkmate

And the Russian oil will sell to developing non-western nations that didn't embargo russia. It will be cheaper and maybe a boom to those nations. This will free up supply in western-compliant oil producers, which will help the EU, but again, it does take years to build that infra.

> China seems to have the work in a semiconductor check.... We may be witnessing the formation of a new world order that we are simply unprepared for.

I think china is the most un-prepared. China had the ultimate check-mate since no one would exist without their manufacturing ability. Their continued lock-downs are forcing companies to move around their supply chains to avoid interruption. Even apple, their crown jewel, is starting to expand. Meanwhile the only thing keeping the Chinese population compliant is a growing middle class and quality of life. If Chinese exports slip, it may trigger unrest. A trump-style trade way may help push china to the edge and we may see more ever-grande esque failures that anger the population.

> I am slightly amused by folks who talk about market technicals while ignoring the elephants in the room.

Because you can't put the elephant in your 401K.
At no point. Indians have a distorted view of caste because of 400 years of British invasion after 500 years of Islamic invasion.

Since economic mobility was greately reduced because of economic stagnation caused by centuries of invasion, they re-applied the originally profession-based caste system using racial discrimination brought to India by the Mughals and the British.
Counterpoint: Hatsune Miku
The real value of haggling is realizing some externality that you can take advantage of - a hail damaged car, a untuned guitar, something that would cost them to deal with and you can take off their hands.
> The contention was that they make the NYT editorial page somehow "right wing," which is obviously false to anyone who actually reads it. It's clearly left wing, and if it feels to you like it isn't, you might be one of those people who is so far to the left that everything else is to your right.

I don't recall that contention, but certainly the NYT opinion pages aren't right wing. However, you dismissing anyone who disagrees without as having a distorted, extreme perspective isn't evidence - other than evidence of your perspective.

I think the NYT's opinion page is diverse, but feel free to support your claim: Count up the columnists and their positions.

> Douthat is probably the least palatable to liberals, but he's often pretty indirect and soft in his columns (compare to the more liberal columnists, who can regularly put out red meat for liberals).

I think this characterization of Douthat is way off. Douthat is direct and puts out absurd BS 'red meat'. I think he puts out more brazen BS than any other columnist I've read there, but I seldom read any opinion pieces. And note I say 'brazen' BS; there's plenty more that is just less brazen. The opinion pages are an embarassment of deceit and manipulation to the NYT and other publications; the deceit, from all parties, is obvious if you are informed. I can predict what many will write based on the political navigation: e.g., for Stephens, 'how do I attack Dems without supporting Trump or sounding irrational?'
What makes you think that? People everywhere try to get an advantage on others why would they suddenly change in silicon valley? If anything, i think it would be worse because it's so competitive.
"If you can't handle me at my BoxFuture, Arc<Mutex<_>> and #[async_trait], you don't deserve me at my zero cost abstractions and fearless concurrency."
I think she just says that I work with computers- that satisfies 99% of those who ask the question. Heck, I even met a classmate who I haven't seen for like 15 years and even she said: what do you do nowadays, work with computers?
One of the rules of thumb you quickly learn when studying the Kelly criterion is that overestimation can lead to ruin, underestimation can at worst lead to slower growth.
Got an email last week from Apple “People team” - aka HR. They said they’ve increased the salary pool for this year, so I guess we’ll see how that pans out.
I just tell everyone, just write Rust like you'd write Scala. Don't try to optimize the crap out of anything until you need it, especially if no one else is going to use your code.

Just make the allocations.

Even if you write it that way it's still significantly more performant and lightweight than the alternatives without much loss in productivity.
So basically OCaml.
That’s the missing link. They’re assuming that the person has to get the F150 - but they could buy something else, but nothing, wait for a cyber truck - many other options.
The argument does not hold any sort of deeper inspection. The greats of quantum mechanics, people like Bohr, Heisenberg, Schrödinger etc. we're all professors, which at the time put you up in the highest ranks of the middle class or the lower upper class + the status of the title it implied in Germany for example. They were amongst the highest paid salaried employees. In comparison now a typical professor salary is lower than what many junior software developers get straight out of undergrad. And that is after years of job uncertainty through PhD, postdocs and tenure track. Essentially the only ones left do out of idealism. (I also believe this long uncertainty is a big factor in the large gender imbalance, women are much less tolerant of this then men)

The other irony is that Teller himself was part (came out) of one of the biggest counter examples. The Los Alamos project pushed unprecedented funding into science, and it let to many discoveries that would have taken decades longer otherwise.
Slightly related, Tesla built a store on tribal land to avoid state laws.
It's a common pattern in Java injection vulnerabilities. You can see an example here:

https://portswigger.net/research/server-side-template-inject...
I do wish async would go away and never come back -- in every language. Some days I long for the NMI: non-maskable interrupt.

I have been coding since the late 70s -- the latter half of the last century. After all I have seen, async feels wrong.
The Unreasonable Effectiveness of “Unreasonable Effectiveness”
This isn't really an easy async programming issue the author was having. I mostly do server backends I'd do with Java or Node with Rust and its fine.
What about winner takes all markets? For instance there's only a few major ridesharing companies. It would be hard to start a small, profitable ridesharing business. And they couldn't pay staff engineers 500k+.
Of course in this market if you had bought one you could have immediately drove it back onto the lot and sold it back for more than you paid …
My parents are from India as well. They are not the best when it comes to tech and gadgets. My Dad was super excited when he learned to share memes with me on WhatsApp. Before pandemic they were visiting me in US and I invited a very close friend of mine who works for Uber to hangout with us. He stayed for a week and it was fun for me to watch him describe his company to my Dad. My Dad "acha to tumhari company taxi chalte hain.." I meant its not wrong but I laughed so hard.
To quote threatofrain:

> All type systems will have meaningful and true propositions which are apparent to the programmer but not yet to the language team... Some of what the author is complaining about matches my conversations with people who aspire to be Rust library authors — that you're often trying to hijack the type system because you <do> actually know better.

Rust catches some problems (like data races and use-after-free). Safe Rust translated into correct C++ is still correct. Rust also fails to catch some problems (like preventing out-of-bounds indexing at compile time); admittedly idiomatic C++ fails to catch bounds errors at runtime. And when encountering problems that Safe Rust cannot solve (like the generic lifetime quagmires in the original post), C++ often makes it possible (and easier than esoteric programming languages like Unsafe Rust) to solve the problem correctly in the current situation; though admittedly, ensuring you haven't missed any UB cases, and validating that your assumptions don't break later on, is difficult (Unsafe Rust is better at marking unsafe code for future readers).
i have a gameboy camera and would really like to use it for zoom meetings. An original mono connectix quick cam would be good, too.

a quick demo of gb camera and gb printer here: https://www.tiktok.com/@robotsdraw/video/7095836827122142510
NAFTA was replaced in 2020.

"In September 2018, the United States, Mexico, and Canada reached an agreement to replace NAFTA with the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA), and all three countries had ratified it by March 2020."
Maybe search for some old luggables and laptops that used gas plasma displays. Like a Toshiba T3100, IBM PS/2 P70, Compaq 2670, etc. Still not cheap, but there should be some for $200-$300 or so.
It's my dream to convert a Ford Transit into a campervan, and I've been eyeing the hybrid/EV ones for a while, so this is great! I'll probably not get it new, but still!
It goes both ways. If anything, I would argue that employees have way more cancel power than founders, and it's far more common for employees to get their founders in trouble than the other way around. No VC will ever do an equity round without doing some research. Not to mention the open letters to founders that have gotten so many fired. Honestly, it's also how it should be - I've seen more founders misbehave than employees. Some founders really think that just because someone gave them a check, they are somehow untouchable.

But regardless if founder or employee, I don't see why we should lie about people misbehaving. If I know someone is a bad apple, I am not going to lie about it - especially if I can prevent someone I care about going through the same ordeal. I also don't know why I should change my mind about someone just because some time has passed. People don't change.

It's frankly pretty appalling that I have to spell this out to you. I suppose you didn't think much of the Me Too movement? While clearly not on the same scale, the fundamental societal mechanics that justify outing perpetrators of sexual harassment are the same ones that justify outing people who break contracts. The society would be a much better place if people knew that karma is real.
Same experience, I never met another tech person that fits the bro stereotype? most of my colleagues are like people on h1b. My idea of a bro is like those frat guys with the popped collars years ago.

Some of this other stuff just sounds like over excited college kids, like adderal and stuff?
Well put. I ultimately view observational studies as hypothesis generators that can spur research into more targeted questions all the way down to the biochemical level.
> 1. Orion is currently available for Apple macOS, iPadOS and iOS. We are planning support for other platforms in the future.

Looks like it may happen but I personally wouldn't hold my breath.
False sense of security or just plugging one hole in a wedge of swiss cheese. It isn't always the server, sometimes it is just the framework. A proxy won't stop that.

https://www.zdnet.com/article/equifax-confirms-apache-struts...
In the IdP/SP/SAML sense of it, I'm really used to that level of validation actually hitting the application and being processed through an authentication subsystem, rather than being done at the webserver level.

Possibly just some nginx features I'm not familiar with, or are there whole apps out there that serve to be nothing other than an authentication layer inside of a webserver? Are they popular?
Rust is hard, from a systems programming perspective, not because of anything about the problem domain but because Rust has an unusually narrow perspective of what systems programming entails. And it is unforgiving for software that has requirements outside that perspective, which happens more often than I think some Rust proponents allow.

Modern systems software architectures are thread-per-core, involve a lot of DMA, etc for performance reasons. That is language agnostic, though most is written in C++ because it is amenable to it. This obviates a lot of the safety features Rust obsesses over. It often feels like the Rust community hasn't acknowledged that this is how systems software actually works these days, or the deficiencies of the language in supporting these software architectures.
Those numbers across the world are?
A huge percentage of people who bitch about dealers have never bought a new car from one - and the majority of those who do, continue to go to the same dealer thereafter.
Their cloud and on-prem offerings diverged quite a while ago, so it makes sense
When I first plugged in my RX 6700 XT, I thought Windows 10 would detect and automatically use it upon reboot. Nope, laggy desktop - I had to download a driver for the GPU from the AMD website. Ubuntu 20.04, on the other hand, immediately supported it out of the box - the only further configuration on my end was to set the frame rate to 144 Hz instead of 60 Hz.
The (unfortunate) reality is that the quality of software engineers outside the major tech hubs even in the US is relatively poor—-and it gets worse abroad. Other countries’ talents tend to migrate to these tech hubs, leaving their home countries with even more relatively poor talent.

This is going to be another decade resembling the outsourcing movement that occurred in the 2000s: and it will have a similar outcome. That outcome being that paying lower wages yields worse results and a huge backlash.
I whole heartedly agreed on this point but have grown to see another side of the issue. I don’t want to over glamorize it but in the north east car dealers have done exceptionally well, and often were the wealthiest people in the towns they serviced. A dealership in Pennsylvania recounted to me how the founder of the dealership more or less built the town square and at one pointed owned more than half the town. Now this may seem negative but the founder is long dead and the dealership now employees a several dozen locals all making very strong salaries, all with minimal educational requirements (just a bachelors cause it’s in vogue).

Overall I guess the point I want to make is even thought it is rent seeking (many industries are) this one seems to provide for so many communities all across America. I find it hard to believe that ford will pass up the savings to the consumers. We all know that profits will be returned to shareholders.
Maybe it's cheaper than leasing the latest and greatest, but not everyone has an unlimited pool of money all the time, and the assumption that this type of purchasing behavior is in any way typical or representative of anything is absurd and out of touch at best, and purposefully misleading for the benefit of Tesla at worst.
Nailed it.

Let's also admit that setting up iptables is harder than it needs to be. I mean, not after the first twenty times... you eventually remember all the arcane logic and expect everyone else to as well.
Even though TikTok is a new platform the phenomena this article describe isn't new. It can also be attributed to other publisher industries than music, i.e. book publishing.

Imagine you where a startup and you go to a VC. The VC tells you that they want to invest. However, they want full ownership of your IP, they want their investment money repaid by taking 100% of your startup's earnings before the company can use any profits (read; It must be entered as an expense in the accounts), and you are not allowed to take out any personal salery until they have their money back. After they have gotten their initial investment money repaid, they want 85% of all profits forever. In return they will maybe try - and this is important - they will MAYBE try to help you succeed. Basically you must accept that you need to do all the lifting, not only the heavy lifting but all lifting.

Would you take their investment money? Probably not. These terms are ridiculous. But artists, writers and other creative producers of their own content have had to live with these kind of terms since forever. The reason has been that the publishers controll the market. They own or control the distribution, and they have the market budgets and connections (often even ownership) to get access to media, whether it is the radio or TV shows that promote your content through talk shows and airplay, or it is the magazines that write about you and your product. Almost no content on the commercial media platforms are there by chance or because an editor found them interesting. It's a market in play.

We might think (and maybe hope) that social media and different self publishing platforms will change this, but the market and industry has gone from too little distribution to too much distribution. There is so much content put out into the market every day that it it is next to impossible to get enough attention to your product. On top of this the attention span on platforms like TikTok is very short. Warhols' 15 minutes is today 15 seconds.

I do not believe we will see the end of publishers like record labels. We will see a shift in their role, and maybe in power distribution among the different players in the market. However, so far it seems like it is the media companies that take all the profit nowadays. Spotify is an excellent example of this, but also "older platforms" like YouTube.
I only hate web developers who try and make money selling me things I don't need.

I love all the other web developers.
already spent more than 10 minutes reading that page and didn’t find any which is why I was asking.
> Now bicycle drivetrains are operated wirelessly rather through cable tension

...ok, now I'm officially a curmudgeon.
Performance, safety, ease of use. You can only pick two.

I like the strategy that Nim employs. Due to multiple ways of memory management strategy you can use (different types of garbage collectors, reference counting, manual memory management or no memory management), you can have different combinations of performance, safety and ease of use - so it can fit nicely what you are trying to accomplish.
Why did this comment get downvoted? It doesn't sound like a lie.
Yes. This. SRAM is the main competition in the bicycle world for Shimano.
It doesn’t matter- Whatever merit there is to your position, your original post was so wrapped up in hyperbole and aggression you completely undercut your own argument, which is why there is such a bevy of responses. I don’t even disagree with some of your points, but the tone-deafness is just completely ridiculous. Let us simply agree to disagree where we do, agree to agree elsewhere, and have peace.
you don't know what you're talking about or anything about induction stoves

induction stoves are far more efficient in terms of heat transferred to food vs gas, which mostly heats the air instead

and yeah it's a bummer the one time every 2 years you go to use all 4 burners at once you won't be able to max amp it
I thought those options could still be sold on secondary markets? I might be wrong though
They usually will in the used lot (if any used cars were available anymore).

And many dealer families run multiple brands under one name.

Eg: https://www.walser.com/new-vehicles/minnesota/
I think it's really quite weird that people talk about the current financial situation without ever mentioning the massive disruption and decoupling that globalization is undergoing right now.

Russia has essentially been excised from the world's economy, and China's lockdowns and other political actions have spooked virtually all foreign investors and business operations in that country. And there's serious consequences for everyone. This inflation crisis is just one of those consequences.
I would say most systems are either slower or less correct, yes. The nice thing about being a developer is that these costs are mostly hidden from us. The business pays for more compute if you churn out slow code, and churning out bugs just increases your job security.

Imagine if you had to pay for the performance loss or production bugs directly though...
If we disagree on what fundamental concepts such as "evidence" and "assertion" mean, and disagree on how burden of proof works, then we wouldn't be having a discussion so much as writing words at each other.

Have a good day / night.
What a nice little surprise hidden in each image, for those with the skills to look
>As I've said before, if you're writing webcrap, use Go. The libraries for web-related stuff are stable and well-exercised, since Google uses them internally.

I don't get why are you so dismissive about web programming?
The Go libraries are good because it's easy to write good libraries in Go. And it's easy to write good libraries in Go, because of design decisions. Same for C#, F#, Java, Python and more.
> Keep telling yourself that. What we do is soooo hard and special and we're soooo smart.

I flip-flop every 6 months between thinking that everybody can do this and being absolutely floored that I myself can keep up with this.

One day we're writing HTML and CSS, and a few years later we're learning about the shadow DOM and why we may want to use React Native Web to run React Native on the web.

One day we're writing a LAMP CRUD app, and a few years later we're deploying a service mesh for resilience, visibility, and configurable networking - concepts that didn't even exist when we were writing CRUD apps.

I'm not a doctor/surgeon, but I don't think that the kind of work they do changes year to year at this pace?

I guess you could say that none of these concepts are really that difficult conceptually, but...what is...? Algebraic Topology? Chaos Theory?
If only there was something renewable we could make or grow and could make a flame... but even if sucha thing was invented i guess that wouldn't have the centuries old traditional essence of natural gas any more?
wow 17 borderline cosmetic opinions on a fully functional vehicle.

how dare they sell that vehicle.

Not to mention that when they bought it, Tesla gave the buyer the opportunity to reject it and have another specimen manufactured at no cost. they decided to keep it because it appears their vanity is literally only skin deep.
>> educate the consumers

Every dealership I've been to has been more interested in feeding me whatever line of crap they think will get me to buy a car, not actually educating me about the different products available.

>> financing, DMV paperwork

Tesla and Carvana have proven these can be taken care of without a third party dealership. In most cases, financing is provided by a bank or credit union, not the dealership itself

>> and most importantly service your vehicles

Unless the fix is covered by warranty, I'm not taking my car anywhere near a dealership. They charge considerably more money than my trusted mechanic. My Hyundai dealership wanted $125 just for an oil change on a 2013 Sonata.

In theory, a dealership could be good for all of these things. In practice though, they suck. There is a reason most people hate car dealerships.
Yeah, but those complex control flows are not free. Drop-to-cancel is a rather powerful foot gun in many cases. Basically you throw out invariants that most people takes for granted, e.g. if a function is started it will complete before exiting the caller's scope.

Regarding cancelation, I think Go got it near perfect with contexts, modulo the explicitness of it. What don't you like about it?