skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You have no idea what any software does with your keys unless you audit it, then compile and install it on your device yourself. Oh, and audit your compiler. And its compiler...
Agree. For other languages it would be Stockholm syndrome but in Rust's case it is enlightenment.
Meanwhile my car has 1000-1200 km range and it takes me total of 3 minutes to refuel.

There are so many things to plan when doing a roadtrip that I sure as shit won’t be adding charging the fucking car to the equation until I’m forced to.
Yes, the combat mechanics did not age well. I think there are mods that overhaul it nicely, or like a sibling comment mentions once you get some skill then it stops feeling so ridiculous (what do you mean I failed to kill this stationary rat with a warhammer that I swung ten times?). If I remember correctly at around 50 skill is when your misses stop feeling so arbitrary.
Excellent work! It’s great to see a platform that combines the power of GraphQL and the ubiquitous access of REST!
There's a standard due diligence process that companies go through for mergers and acquisitions etc, through which you get access to material data.

He chose not to do that. He chose to make the acquisition "sight unseen" in a way that also left the him on the hook for $1bn if he pulled out of the deal.

Now he's trying to dodge the $1bn clause, but the contract he signed doesn't give him many ways out.
Interesting! The British do like Fantasy! Harry Potter would probably be even higher today, and I would have expected Pratchett to be higher.
Well then the story should be that KIA should improve their routing software and maybe license ABRP algorithm...

I don't ever do any planning when leaving for a road trip in my Tesla: I just let the car tell me where I have to stop... Nothing complicated there.
It's true - EV (L3/fast charging) charging infra is not reliable at all.

Electrify America has the most coverage (at least in the Seattle area), but their stations are unreliable. IME, >50% of the time, I'll have to replug multiple times or try another station. (or have to find another location)

Be prepared to have a backup location or two in case you need to charge during your trip. Also, allocate extra time for charging as your EV may not charge at the full power it's rated for. (In winter my Bolt takes 2x the time to fast charge it does in the summer).
You can only feel sunshine and grass because your brain interprets sensory signals from your body. It’s easy to imagine a world where your cyborg body can deliver those same signals. If the sensation is the same, why would you _not_ exhchange your fragile meat sack of a body with a far more versatile mechanical one?
If that bias leads to action, as shown in [0] of my earlier post, then isn't that corruption?

EDIT: punctuation correction.
A story brought to you by the owners of Fox News.

I canceled my WSJ subscription 6 months ago.

It’s a climate change denying, EV hating, and proponent of other popular right agenda ideas
Very few people in our political discourse are asking people to give up their privilege of owning a car. However, some are asking for car owners to pay for the externalities of owning a car. That might lead to some lifestyle changes, like a two-parent household owning one car instead of two like they're used to.

And yes, maybe that restricts a car owner's "freedom", but should those car-based externalities be free?
async is final unfortunately. My experience with rust so far is that there is a small set of program structures which Rusts type system works well for, and a large set of programs and structures where it becomes an unholy mess to make work e.g. deep lifetime magic, complex async/traits scope, etc.

If you stick on the golden path then the compiler has your back, deviate, and then you are stuck in a deep hell of compiler suggestions that don't pan out. One observation I've had is that complex lifetime problems are usually solved by copy's or the use of unsafe in most production code. I would love to see a future equivalent of "clean code" for Rust, as the current situation is reminiscent of early java programming.
I do the exact same thing. The only drawbacks are that I occasionally miss calls that I would have wanted to answer. Here's an example why this became necessary. I was recently looking to pre-qualify for a mortgage, now I'm getting 6-8 calls a day at various hours and even multiple unsolicited texts. It's amazing how awful using a phone has become and incredibly distracting.
> A team at the University of Tokyo created a special device that can deliver 10 diverse odors in a way that is accurate and timely

I've always wondered how far off we are from being able to "3D print" tastes and smells. I had a machine learning professor tell me that chemoreception is the only sense that can't be decomposed into "eigensmells" or "eigentastes" - not sure if that still holds true today.

They don't talk about the mechanics of this machine, but my guess is it just emits ten unique chemical compounds, rather than doing any kind of mixing.
64*0 = 0, so I think you mean "from 1 user to 64". No idea what the actual numbers are though.
> Maybe, but you're missing the other use case - that in the future you'll need an extension requiring geometries that are considered invalid by the current set of rules, forcing you to update all tools processing the file format to acommodate the new extension.

I think the way to go is to define several layers of correctness. A data set might then be partially valid. In such cases a tool might, for example, support transitions from a complete valid state A to a complete valid state C by an intermediate partially valid state B. (As databases with referential integrity may allow intermediate states in a transaction where referential integrity is broken.)
But I wonder if you could use the modified version the author posted with AltStore (or plain old Xcode signing) to get virtualization support on the M1 iPads which don't require kernel modifications. I'd pay $100 a year for a developer account if I knew I could run macOS and Linux at near native speed on my iPad.

Does anyone know if you can install apps that use private entitlements without a jailbreak if you compile/sign them yourself?
That does make a lot of sense.
> in order to keep our iPhone and gas prices down, and our children fed

Bullshit. None of that is for our sake. These people aren't running charities or ideologically driven; they're just greedy scumlords who would happily sell guns to 8 year olds, or systematically deny climate change for 50 years, if it made them money.
>> The thesis that it's ok that we simply not give humanity places to speak & share is ghastly.

> That goes against today's mainstream ideal of de-platforming people who say provably false

Two things, first, there's a difference between (almost) no one being able to speak online & most everyone except those who social pressures have massively turned against. Even if we did fully kick people off the internet, the scale seems to be less than 1-in-a-million problematic segments of humanity to people who do more or less fine. The main discussion to me isnt the unpallatable ones- it's the 99.999999% case, it's what's generally available before you fuck up & piss society off, brcome too hot to handle. Tbis horseshit about anyone having to host content having to be a publisher is an actual mortal threat to whether humanity (generally) is allowed a voice & to share & express themselves. The minor exceptional case you discuss wouldnt be a case at all without there being an ability to speak, which Australia g the "publishers" brigade of shouters threatens.

Second, I continue to argue even the deplatformed have enormous & vast powers to present themselves online. Their personage may not be welcome on various vast platforms- but if they set up a website, a weblog, or whatnot, usually that content can be shared. Even that is more than these people necessarily ought receieve, is businesses performing services for them for free. Even if the platform blocks your site entirely, you still have a site. People can freely of their own will type in your domain name & go there. They can use other sites to link to you. Communications capabilities are fantastically cheap, just epically low cost, from hardware (purchased or rented) to software (free in many cases). The deplatformed have tried to band together & erect their own platforms time and time again, and no one stops them, no one prevents that. They fail all on their own, have yet to arise to become places of vitality & noteability.
That's a serious [citation needed] claim; even if everyone switched to electric vehicles tomorrow, that only accounts for 10-20% of global emissions, and we've gotta cut a lot more than that.
I'm as shocked as you, but the Darklang back end rewrite is complete
Even this doesn't give you optimal locality. Objects in the same pool are closer than if they were randomly fragmented from a global allocator, but if you're accessing them in the list order, you're not accessing adjacent addresses to take advantage of memory prefetch. If the pool is large, it may not even fit in the cache.

When performance needs to be maximized, games switch to entity component systems and switch from arrays-of-structs to structs-of-arrays. This enables processing all objects as a vector, linearly from start to end, and often without needing to fetch any irrelevant bytes that aren't processed in a given pass. This sometimes also helps utilize SIMD for data spanning more than one entity, which you can't do when using linked lists.
If you hold your position because you believe it is grounded in the Word of God, then no evidence or argument is going to dissuade you. That is what "uncompromising" means.
It’s been said in various news outlets over and over again that Dutch Intelligence watched them carry out the DNR hack. Of course they aren’t going to release actual evidence. The info was released to the press much later presumably after the Dutch hack was no longer useful.

See another commenters article from Ars above.
Not original questioner, but to rephrase the question slightly:

Is there anything you should do with macros that you can’t do with similar language features like higher order functions?

My concern with macros is that they are completely open-ended, so you can really do anything - and if you can do anything, then the language is not usefully defining a strict enough semantic structure. As an example, see the 'hygiene problem'.
> Those idiots goes on a thousand miles journey and don't bother doing the slightest research. 2 minutes with ABRP (abetterrouteplanner.com)...

You're seriously calling these people idiots for not knowing about some specific four-word domain site that I've never heard of in my life.

This is why I don't touch Twitter with a ten-foot pole. People like this, calling other people idiots, because they wrote an article with a contrary opinion to their own. Perhaps the only idiotic thing here is the suggestion that someone is required to visit "abetterrouteplanner.com" to properly use a product that costs tens of thousands of dollars.
> everyone said it would never go down

Citation needed.

The US Gov literally said the current (in 2008) high price are due to demand/supply mismatch and "most industry experts contend that oil resources are plentiful ... Drilling activity is at a high level" [1]. As in the price will go down.

OPEC only needs to control its members a tiny bit. Oil is sold on the margin and so a tiny demand/supply mismatch means a large price difference [2].

[1]: https://www.dallasfed.org/~/media/documents/research/eclett/...
[2]: https://www.vox.com/2015/1/5/7493799/oil-prices-chart
This is what makes an electric can untenable for my use-case. I can end up having to drive 400-500 km in a day to go for site visits and other tasks. I'm rather baffled that there don't seem to be any easy battery swap options for the mainstream EVs. Hell, I'd be happy if I could throw a spare battery in the trunk for those times when I need the extra range.
Ah yes, this is what I thought was the current state. I was curious if a GIL removal decision had been made that I had missed, but seems like it's still a soft "maybe":

https://lukasz.langa.pl/5d044f91-49c1-4170-aed1-62b6763e6ad0...

Edit: And to be fair, you can do "true" concurrency in Python you just have to eject to Multi-processing (with the tradeoffs that implies), so I didn't want to assume the comment was about GIL removal.
The point of learning about linked lists is not to actually, you know, write a linked list. For one reason, your language of choice probably already has one, but also, in the process of learning about linked lists, you're supposed to also learn about their drawbacks[0]. No, the point is that there are a lot of linked-list-like things in the world, so knowing about how to work with linked lists helps you work with those things when you encounter them.

[0] Seems there are a lot of problems that stem form Comp Sci students skimming the syllabus and not actually reading the material.
That's mostly what people do.

The current format stores locations and references to locations, so for example, a line feature only stores references to locations, so to realize it on a map, you have to go through the data and find all the locations it references and build up the actual geometric feature. So people do caching and so on, for sure.

The proposed changes would make that sort of data transformation easier and less resource intensive.
Its a little surprising that authorities haven't gone after Yandex itself.
I never said poor Elon so please don't use false language to frame your own counter statement. I said the media and Elon use each other and that we're all pretty tired of that.

"Twitter did nothing wrong here" -- what kind of framing is that?

Again there is no victimization of Elon - he's just trying to get out of a deal - you are using some overly hyperbolic language in your comment which is common these days and equally as annoying as Elon's twitter thread.
they use Scrum?
My son hates on Discord pretty seriously and so do I.

I had fun joining Discords to coordinate play in League of Legends, but there are few things I dread more than the open source project than the open source project that says "join our Discord".

There are numerous problems such as: discords are often divided into way too many sub-rooms, somebody with too much time on their hands is always the first person to introduce the forum to people joining, etc.
But justification is part of one's position. If you hold your position because you believe it is grounded in the Word of God, then no evidence or argument is going to dissuade you.
That is a very poor argument to backup your claim. Not is it just anecdotal, why do you even assume that everyone else has the same experience as you do? Reports and statistics are much more believable. I cited a report. Do you have anything of equal stature to counter it?
True, but it can be indicative of a bad safety/design culture when multiple instances start surfacing. That's a much bigger deal than explaining a one-off
I've always held the belief that given the vastness of space, and the age of time, it's not just a question of if other intelligent life can exist, but whether or not we we will be in the same place at the same time.
For a reference, as of

Wednesday, May 6th, 2009

at

http://books.google.com/books?id=DgqLplWtGPgC&pg=PA76&lpg=PA...

(but not now, no longer)

from page 76 of

Susan Milbrath, Star Gods of the Maya:
Astronomy in Art, Folklore, and Calendars
(The Linda Schele Series in Maya and
Pre-Columbian Studies), ISBN-13
978-0292752269, University of Texas Press,
2000.

with

"Indeed, blood sacrifice is required for
the sun to move, according to Aztec
cosmology (Durian 1971:179; Sahaguin 1950
- 1982, 7:8)."
Not until ReactOS gets the COM vNext introduced by WinRT.
The route from New Orleans to Chicago is surprisingly short on fast chargers. Had she picked destinations within a similar distance in any other direction, such as El Paso to the west or Miami to the (south)east, she would have had a very different experience. I think it's possible that she chose her destination knowing the state of infrastructure along the route.
I think a lot of the complaints about rust's difficulty come from people trying to use async in rust. I don't think the problem there is that rust is "different". The problem is that async rust isn't ready yet.

Rust's ecosystem pushes users toward using async for IO, and async support in the language & compiler is wildly incomplete. And it has been for years - the last big async feature (the async keyword) landed 2.5 years ago [1]. But its barely usable as-is. Building software with async today feels like trying to build a house out of daggers. Traits? Nope. Closures? Nope. Regular types? Only if they're Pinned. Your types are pinned, right? Iterators over async objects? Nope that doesn't work. Library support? Without traits, libraries are limited in what they can provide. Async rust? Batteries are not included.

We need TAIT, GAT, async closures, async iterators / streams, and a bunch of other little quality of life improvements before I'd consider it "done". I don't know where async's momentum went, but its a bit disappointing how halfbaked async is given how nice the rest of the language is.

[1] https://areweasyncyet.rs/
It is prudent to check all facts when negotiating an acquisition. The time to do this was before agreeing to the acquisition. I would also argue the way he's doing it is wrong, but I'm not a hardball negotiator so maybe publicly venting is right.
I think it is important that we all distinguish between DAU and MDAU when debating what the likely number is. Frankly, I do not understand why it matters. Musk bought the company based on the idea that it is undervalued: 1) he wants to move away from ads and 2) he wants to grow the user base. If it turns out there are fewer "real" users on the platform than previously thought, isn't that bullish for the prospect of adding more users?
I find Musk's tactics to be abhorrent, but I'm looking beyond tactics at the core argument: I do not think it's clearly bad if it turned out Twitter had fewer than expected users when his case is that he can add more users. So long as they didn't fudge the money numbers - earnings and revenue - I don't see how this metric is considered material enough to break the deal.
> instead directed him to two guys who had incorporation papers and nothing else

That's not true.

They were already working on a proprietary motor that would go on to become the basis of the Tesla motor.

They got Series A funding from Musk and other sources (though Musk was the largest funder) at the start of 2004.

He also wasn't really involved in day to day ops, but provided "vision" for the Roadster from 2007 onwards - that's when he became more involved.
It's impossible to get a phone number without a personal ID in a large amount of western countries (number of which is increasing).
Lunatic (https://docs.rs/lunatic/0.7.0/lunatic/) is an Erlang inspired alternative to async rust and manual threads.
I think, that they presented on Internet as a soup of pointers, because it is the obvious and general way to do it. Other ways like connectivity matrix are less general: if you have a lot of nodes, and by several orders of magnitude less then N^2 edges, then the most of matrix elements will be empty. Moreover it is not obvious way, you need to explain it also on top of your goal to explain what you are explaining about geometry/topology. So if you tried to do it you'd spend all the allotted time talking about pros and cons of different representations of topology.

I believe that if someone tried to talk about topology while using Rust as a language for sample code, he/she would use some other representation, because a soup of pointers is a PITA in Rust. It is easier to claim that we will be using a connectivity matrix, or a Vec of edges, and to explain how it works, than to juggle with pointers.
Because the SoC is not the only component of a computer and neither is one benchmark score. Other components are the power system, (lack of) cooling, flash storage…
The "global data graph" is probably going to have network effects if they succeed. This is what makes otherwise less than great experiences (facebook et al) so sticky.

So the question of the technical ability to replicate a service is not always the critical factor.
https://hiddenremote.com/2017/05/21/yes-blood-boy-silicon-va...
> These things only work if everyone does them.

> You twist it around to pin the blame on green activists somehow not doing enough in their personal lives

Do we all have to do them.or not? That seems pretty simple. Yes, if you want everyone in the world to give up eg cake, then you need to start first. Otherwise you are virtue signaling - indicating group membership by taking no cost actions like wearing a pin, changing your facebook icon or commenting asserting others are not doing enough.

I too can tell other people to not drive or not eat meat. I don't because I still drive and I still eat meat.

> If we want people to give up their cars we need..

Now you are changing the problem.
I remember reading about an actual observational study on this -- I think on HBR -- and the conclusion was basically that managers that are technically skilled have much happier employees on average.

Another finding from the same study was that the statements "I feel like my manager can do my job" and "I am not looking for new work" were strongly correlated. (This sounds like the same thing but isn't.)

In other words, you have to be one he'll of a people person to make up for cards stacked against you.
ABRP is good but tends to over-optimize. I prefer the navigation app built into my Tesla.
Nah, they're idiots because they didn't spend 30 seconds googling "map of best electric car chargers for travel" or something.
I never said that EVs don't have some regressions but anyone who gets behind the wheel of one and doesn't take that into account is not someone I would trust with almost anything requiring problem solving skills. I'm not aware of anyone saying "You can jump in an EV and go anywhere with reckless abandon", I know you can more or less do this with ICEs but no one is saying they are completely equivalent.

If you want to save money on the medium your car uses (gas vs electric) there are currently some downsides that you may or may not find acceptable. Jumping into an EV and expecting it to work just like an ICE or to be able to do a cross-country trip with little planning or knowledge of the car you are using is just silly. There are countless videos/articles about people successfully doing this, but that's not as interesting as this clickbait BS.
Sadly, there's no general duty of lawyers to only raise good faith arguments. There are specific duties not to mislead courts, but it's a pretty high bar and not relevant here since there's no court involved (yet).

There is a possibility that Musk's tactic will work here. I just think it's unlikely because the Delaware courts will see this for what it is: a pretext for buyer's remorse.

Because of this (small) possibility of success, there isn't any reason why Mike & Skadden can't ethically represent Musk here.
By today standards, 6502 is a nanocontroller... or maybe even a picocontroller. Go buy yourself a real microcontroller, y'hear me? /s