skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Can you clarify then what you mean by “because of moving ice?”
that's one of the reason i got rid of my samsung phone: it used to send random nonsense notifications, MULTIPLE TIMES A DAY.

it would keep asking me to let samsung use my phone's cpu for whatever stuff they're doing, send multiple weather notification during the day (i didn't ever ask for them and now it's my job to go hunt for the appropriate setting to change to disable them? go f@@k yourself, you just lost a customer) and many more that i'm now thankfully forgetting.
We're nowhere close to that. Covering all land in solar would be ~100x our current energy needs, and then we still have ocean (most of the surface) available.
I'm not convinced working mothers are all that happier tbh, and by having them work the market equilibria shift towards requiring them to work. It's more like gain in individual freedom, loss for everyone.
I agree with you, the other problem is to rely on only one system.
Our global economy is fragile in this sense.
Not in a monopoly or oligopoly, which is the common case in markets with high barriers to entry.
How would you know the difference between a pharmacological effect and a placebo effect in yourself? By definition a placebo effect is indistinguishable from a pharmacological effect, so you don't know which one it is. The idea of research like this is to tell one from the other because anecdata - which is effectively "asking anyone who does it" - is impossible to rely on.

If I've missed your point, I think you need to unpack "bullshit" before anyone can take your comment seriously.
Yes, but if you look at it through a pair of utilitarian glasses this is a net good for the world. He made most of his money arbitraging the difference in price of bitcoin between Western and Asian exchanges, to be fair. Notably he's the only person I've ever heard of who said "I want to be a billionaire to Earn to Give" and actually become one within two years! He was at Jane Street prior to his crypto work.
Scientist: "Hey, that's interesting"

HN: "In mice! Move along, nothing to see here!"
Tesla customer gets new Model 3 with cracks
Bridging the Brain and Data Sciences
You didn't have to take it in a personal insult direction friend. It's such a common response to an issue you really do not understand.

I'll refrain from salty comments concerning the quality of my work because you're already sold on the ideal that the platform is totally ethical, despite many well selling artists saying the same things I have numerous times.

The platforms exist to promote artists, they do not do that at all.

It's really not for me to defend the merits of my work in response to expressing my experience on the platform... It's really not for you to insult someone you know nothing about, who says they've worked hard. You should really think about that... I have solid success in many other places than Spotify, and that's why I dedicate my time there and not to Spotify.
So is the spike protein shedding real. I've learned in school that viruses directly exchange genetic information with each other. The possibility of wild RNA coming from the environment would be something new.
I don't really see "is it beneficial in the long run" and "is it an aggressive standardization campaign by one interested party" as being the same question.

At any rate I also didn't say they shouldn't experiment with using it as an accelerated path for http. I didn't think they shouldn't with spdy either. But historically RFCs were built on practice, not the other way around.

If I were the Internet Dictator, I'd be a big fan of standardizing the semantics of http separate from the physical transport and then defining best practices for using alternative transports in the wild, and then eventually standardizing what comes out of that process.

To me it's an indictment of how all this shook out that we're so quickly looking to replace http/2. I think moving to quic is a good move but maybe we didn't need an official http/2 standard in the meantime.
Exactly this. In any sort of survival-of-the-fittest environment, a redundant system can always be outcompeted by a highly optimised, brittle one, that dodges a few bullets.
Microdosing is more like 0.25 tabs (or less). What you're talking about is not microdosing.
Let's cover each one of these in turn:

1. Cover art / liner notes - any given digital album can include links to these notes or even a website with the cover art, and if you're referring to the physical component I would argue that's just less trash that comes with the predominant reason for me purchasing music... which is the music.

2. Ability to share music - I frequently share music from Spotify all the time, either using the Spotify link and sending it to my friends over Chat, or even just telling them the name of it and they can frequently find the exact song on YouTube.

3. Ability to sell music - since I'm not really purchasing the music on Spotify I don't feel like this is a fair argument

4. Music stores - i'll give you this one though for a lot of us we simply don't have the free time to physically browse for music in a brick and mortar store.

5. Discovery - anecdotal of course but I've had the exact opposite experience, the Discover weekly list that Spotify provides invariably introduces me to new artists that I would've otherwise never even heard of, and if I like a song I can look for playlists curated by users that contain that song, which is an additional avenue of discovery.
And they will be if it's feasible and there is a demand. I wonder how difficult it would be to farm-raise them. We do it with many varieties of fish.
This is the point. High energy needs to be transferred in a narrow beam, and be minimally impacted by all layers of our atmosphere
> journal articles tend to be truthy in their claims

The replication crisis (aka replicability crisis or the reproducibility crisis) says you really really shouldn’t trust most journal articles.
The thing is that British (mainly Tory) politicians who believe in privatisation do not care about basically anything other than tax bills or giving contracts to conveniently nepotistic ventures.

Sometimes there is nothing wrong with this, but equally we have lost vast amounts of skills within our borders basically because privatisation is aimed at the wrong kind of efficiency.
I would love to see the CERN open up its Openstack cloud to the public:

https://openstack.cern.ch/

I would trust the CERN much more than GAIA-X and this Lidl cloud to become an european alternative to AWS, Azure and GCP.
For some reason I had never thought of doing that.

Thanks, I will do so from now on!
> I never used AOL, but as a kid, receiving the 3.5" floppy in the mail was really nice. Saved me having to buy one!

Those were sooo ubiquitous. But I never saved any, and now I wish I had some.

Luckily, the Smithsonian is on the job: https://www.si.edu/object/nmah_1395721
If you asked me what “a few kb” times “hundreds of thousands” is, I’d have characterized it as “more than a few hundreds of thousands of kb”, not necessarily “gigabytes,” and that doesn’t sound impractical at all. My JVM heaps are usually 16GB.

And go actually does a pretty good job of scheduling hundreds of thousands of threads. 6 months ago I did some fairly abusive high-thread-count experiments solving problems in silly ways that required all N goroutines to participate and I didn’t see much perf falloff on my laptop until I got 1.5-2 million goroutines.
That's amazing! Competitions in courses have always motivated me to go above and beyond, even though they were never graded.

I'm assuming you had a longer time frame than one week? I realize this is a long shot, but do you happen to remember what strategies performed best when you took that course?
I wanted to add a smart remark saying that once upon a time, in better times long gone, a long time before leetcode was invented, handwriting itself was used as a criterion to hire.

Then the first hit on google was a paper from 2018 about how to hire based on handwriting.
For me, https://tailscale.com/ gives me an easy-to-use personal network. It uses wireguard with custom configuration on top of it.
You're flagger. That's not a very interesting way to continue the discussion.
I’m personally very excited for developments towards Incremental View Maintenance (IVM) in Postgres.

https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Incremental_View_Maintenanc...
If an app gives me spammy promotional notifications, it either A) gets uninstalled (if I don't particularly care about the app), B) gets a 1-star review with a clear comment about the notifications, or C) all of the above.

The app I use to pay for parking spots suddenly gave me a notification once, apparently to try and get me to park my car more often or something. I gave it a one-star review, never saw one of those notifications again :-)
(Which reminds me, I should revise that review.)
Which one are saying then that the expectation is not positive?
You'll probably be happy to see the 1.17 dev version of gitea (which should be the next major release) actually has an artifact repository built in and it can even host docker images: https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/packages/overview/ You have to build the branch yourself right now though, despite being in the docs it's not in the release downloads yet. You might be able to get rid of nexus and just use this built in registry.
Main benefit is avoiding transmission losses through our atmosphere. Capturing the signal is easy (we have satellite communication already)
I agree that we need Journalism as in reporting on current events, as it appears that we are drowning opinion-editorial content
You can put stickers and background pictures all over your brand devices too, that's not really a problem. We're talking about circumventing secure enclaves, which I'm pretty sure Lamborghini will sue you (and win) for, same as Sony and Nintendo for example.
Drive fast and deliver broken things.
We're talking about professional journalists working for mainstream publications publishing unflattering facts about the richest man in the world; I err on the side of caution, but I do not fall in the trap of believing journalists should be treated by the sole measure that everything they do is bad.
One of the greatest antidepressant is having agency in your life. When you take anything that is supposed to make you feel better it is telling your mind that you are back in control. So that might be what is happening when people microdose.

The fact that they “removed any expectations that this was a psychedelic drug” is tantamount to removing the agency.

https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/intuition/vol13/iss2/10/

However, the fact that they did not test this on depressed patients is, well, depressing. When someone has depression, it is very easy to know when it leaves.
For those who don't know Jay Forester is one of the persons responsible for world3, and the limits to growth report 50 years ago.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Limits_to_Growth
Your comment is itself ridiculous.

Do you expect them to go directly to clinical trials with no preliminary research? Of course not. This is exploratory research, not medical advice.
Anything by Bill Bryson, but especially “At Home” and “One Summer: America, 1927”. Both are brilliant.

“John Adams” by David McCullough. Possibly the best historical bio ever.

“The Making of the Atomic Bomb” by Richard Rhodes. The best recounting of the founding of Los Alamos.

“Hackers” by Steven Levy. The best book on the birth of creatine coding.

“The Soul of a New Machine” by Tracy Kidder. The best tale of hardware design I know.

“Masters of Doom” by David Kushner. The best book on the early days of gaming, esp. about Carmack and Romero.

Anything by Eric Raymond, esp. “The Cathedral and the Bazaar”.
While I generally agree with the points you make, I have to disagree that there's zero difference between "throwing a pebble [toothpick, pencil, etc]" and making an improvised device to launch a projectile. Sure, you could put out an eye either way, but only one of those methods is designed specifically with the goal of accurate, repeatable assault. You could very well define such a device as a weapon, whereas defining someone's arms as weapons is trickier based on their use cases and legal precedent. If I throw a pencil and it sticks in someone's eye it was a freak accident and I'm only liable up to that standard. If I shoot a person in the eye with an improvised device, then it's much easier to argue that I meant to do it.
MAC address, randomised by the pocket-sized computer owner as needed. Perhaps laypersons are less able to distinguish computer networks from telephone networks than they were 20-30 years ago. Signal relies on a computer network. Signal runs on "personal computers" that are bundled with "phones", but not on phones that lack personal computers. Perhaps one day we will reach the point where "VoIP" becomes meaningless because all voice will be carried over IP.
No need. It was just pushing something inside the drive. A little piece of paper jammed in the hole worked fine too.

You also drilled a hole on the other side to make the disk double density.
at least on Android there's no need to completely uninstall it. you can disable the app with force stop; this should allow it to get updates, but shouldn't allow it to run again until you open it manually
It does sound like overthinking to me, but context is king. Without context/requirements we're just guessing.

Maybe the job interview is for Space X and they're working on some new system of mini-satellites-on-a-rope called Hyper-rope, or maybe google is trying to pivot their failed Loon project into some kind of air-born connectivity solution, and the rope is actually a very long fiber-optic cable.

Or the interview could be for an online eCommerce platform and the person being interviewed will most likely have to work in a huge heterogeneous codebase with all the important technical decisions already made.

otherwise the question doesn't make sense
Well that is my point. I love these types of subjects, but when I'm having a beer with friends and we find a puzzle like this one and we try to take it as far as possible without going into fiction/bullshit territory.

So it could be useful to check/signal for culture fit, and in OP's case it actually worked like that
OP: "We value people that love to get into this type of discussions/arguments"
Interviewee: "Gosh, you guys bored me to death during the technical interview but it seems like we have similar tastes when it comes to theoretical puzzles so I'll give you another chance"

Nothing wrong with this though. It just proves that interviewing is a complex process and actual merit and success are highly subjective.
Bit disingenuous to credential Tommy Robinson as a “citizen journalist”, given he’s notoriously the face of a far-right organisation and is a convicted, violent criminal.

That doesn’t mean he should have his speech curtailed, but does warrant an accurate portrayal if you’re using him as an example in an op-ed…
I don't think I really agree with the conclusion that we would notice that. Lifespans and aging are long-term things and the average person has been eating a lot of different things, everyone has stories of the smoker or drinker who lived til 90 and the healthy one who lived til 65 - the amount of confounding variables is very obfuscating, not to mention the massive presumed role of genetics

Additionally, I would guess this isn't a well-known animal, a different comment from user "evdubs" [0] pointed out:

> When served raw, they have a chewy texture and peculiar flavor likened to "rubber dipped in ammonia"

[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31634129
It’s the ideological difference between “equality” (of opportunity) vs “equity” (of outcome). The former increases freedom, the latter increases coercion.

I see freedom valuable and coercion damaging. Freedom to choose also requires you to be able to choose the “wrong” choice. So in my view enforcing gender equality is just as bad, if not worse, as enforcing gender inequality.
I'm not sure I understand what your point is, that since digital discovery doesn't provide every single artist in perpetuity throughout the universe that it is somehow not useful as an avenue of discovery?

I can spin this argument directly around and guarantee that if you go to the Louisiana music factory in New Orleans, that for every artist and album they know about, there are 1000 international or country specific artists that are available only online to listeners in America via online channels.
You can blink faster
Video games are generally upheld as an example of good self regulation. In the US the ESRB review system was created entirely by the industry. It has universal adoption and is enforced by almost every retailer (despite being a diverse group). Futhermore the ESRB has much clearer standards than the equivalent for films.

Is it impossible to imagine the industry creating a similar system around online transactions or gambling?
Uh, 1 vs 5 tabs is a huge difference. Assuming 1 tab is say 75 micrograms, 1 tab is having “expanded consciousness” and 5 tabs is a 16 hour trip with full on ego death and 5 days afterglow. Maybe I misunderstand what you mean, but in my reckoning, there’s no such thing as 1-5 tabs. You take 1 tab for a lightweight Sunder afternoon. If you took 5 tabs, you’ll not be sleeping for a day and you’ll think you are floating in a sea of cheese the majority of it. 5 tabs means you’ll not be able to maintain coherent thought….
Both are somewhat obliquely related to programming, but I really enjoyed incredible.pm and (the demo of) vim-adventures.com
I was just making a joke about the misspelling.
Right now the focus of mirrord is for back end engineers, so the use case is backend engineers wanting to work on real traffic and real environment being able to do so without help of or change of infrastructure
Jiaolong: Sichuan's Privately-Run City
It really, really doesnt have to be that complex. If people are religious nuts to believe suicide would bring them to some religion's hell (it won't, since it doesn't exist even if their variant of god(s) would exist), there are tons of ways to pass out rather quickly and not fulfill that criteria, and not bother anybody with the process (various car/train jumpers or suicide-by-cop doers whom I consider utter selfish a-holes).

Walk out to a storm or blizzard not equipped for it. Go fight a bear or lion or crocodile. Go for a swim that you can't come back from. Do some high risk type of adventure that in high age is not even discussed. If you make it, great experience, move to next one.

The list is literally endless and can be done in some form even by quadriplegics. It allows you to plan goodbye and closures, wills etc. The fear and pain and suffering is concentrated into such a tiny sliver of time compared to dying discussed its uncomparable.

It just takes balls to accept that this is it, what mattered for you in life is over, and now its time to think about your closest ones and not yourself. Like a breakup, many will continue living in bad relationship since its a small amount of pain and evil every hour, every day. Instead of standing up and walking off to uncertainty and freedom.
Complexity can stabilize an unstable system, allowing it to stick around long enough for us to notice how unstable it really was all along when the stabilization eventually fails.
But the reputation of Elden Ring far outshines the reputation of Diablo. Activision Blizzard is dying for reason
The lowest bidder among many, all vying for some dust from the bottom of my enormous Scrooge McDuck vault of gold?
Why is this even a news story. Just refuse delivery or report it and get it repaired. Berlin is a new factory it's gonna have some bumps along the road. At least the issues aren't as prevalent as they were during hell week for M3 a couple years ago.
Again, I am not saying those other factors do not matter, obviously they do.

But if it was "interest rates" driving everything -- then every area would be very expensive, not just the areas where there are high salaries and lots of inflow and basically zero new construction.

The Bay Area population grew 7.4% from 2010 to 2020 -- that's 614,901 residents according to census. New construction in that same time period was under 200,000 units.

So: where are all those people living? Many of them are living with roommates, etc., and because of the scarcity of housing, having your own place has become a luxury that costs extra money. If 600k people are complying for 200k units, prices will go up regardless of what interest rates do. Then, salaries rise in response where they can, because tech companies need to pay enough for people to be able to move here (always more expensive, thanks to rent control and Prop. 13, than already living here) -- which then pushes home prices even higher, because there still isn't enough housing to go around, and the 30% of people who can bid the most are the ones who clear the market. (And then, of course, everyone else who isn't pulling in tech salaries is just shut out of the market.)

Interest rates matter on the margin, yes, of course -- but the cost of capital is still low compared with availability. A couple making $400k combined is going to be able to bid more on a house at 3% interest than at 5% interest, but the only reason they're bidding so much at all is that there aren't enough homes to go around and they want one.
Just wait until the bean counters force everyone to only use electricity for energy. Grids will be overloaded and will go out consistently. They will also just turn off your electricity if you do something they don’t like.
> You're able to directly message people that are not your friends and see who saw your profile (no matter their privacy configuration, I believe)

Haha. Sorry, but if someone really wants to see your LinkedIn profile and wants to remain anonymous, then I doubt any "premium" subscription is going to help.
I'm basing it on metrics from networks I manage (and where a signed policy is in effect that law-mandated decryption proxies are in use). The crap people will still do on such networks is baffling, and we're not talking just white collar tech workers or something like that, it's all across the board. (granted, it's only about 150k users in western EU, 10k in Africa and 25k in canada, so may not be representative of the world at large) That experience combined with the number of visitors/users for those platforms I mentioned results in what I wrote.

For you and me, we already have plenty of options, there is no 'taking it back' because we already have it. If you use Iceweasel on Debian fore example, you're pretty much there already.
Generally drugs that cure a condition cost MORE than the pre-existing treatments while under patent protection with no viable competitors. There’s only one source and you’d rather cure the disease with a pill so you’ll pay more.

Market dynamics don’t come into play when there’s only one. If competitors appear or after patents expire it may get cheap, but the cost early on will have no relation at all to production costs.
The pension fund could have invested in VOO. No one forced them to invest risky investments.