skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I know you're looking for something even more high-level, but here are the highest-level tools I've come across recently:

https://docs.poshtools.com/powershell-pro-tools-documentatio...

https://github.com/bczsalba/pytermgui

https://github.com/Textualize/textual - discussed here:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31143327

Auto-generation of UI was an area of active research circa the early 2000s. I don't know if anything came of said research.
Yes, absolutely and without a problem.

Vantablack is effectively a black body, and it's at room temperature with no need for radiation protection or worries about an event horizon.

The thing is, a black body doesn't mean it emits no light. Instead, it absorbs all light and emits black-body radiation - a certain spectrum which depends only on its temperature.

A hot piece of iron in the foundry glows due to its black-body radiation.

A cat is at body temperature, which very close to that of people.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black-body_radiation#Human-bod... works out that the peak wavelength for black-body light from humans is 9.50 µm - infrared.

Humans can't see infrared, and very little of the energy comes in the form of visible light.

So your hypothetical cat would look like a black shadow, but would purr and be no problem to pet.
> The customer service experience of criminals isn't the right thing to optimize and probably has nothing to do with outcomes if not inversely correlated with crime reduction.

The vast majority of contemporary approaches to policing, but dating back to e.g. Peel in the mid 19th century, run quite contrary to your ideas. The people that police interact with and "the broader community" should not be any different (this basic idea is called community policing), otherwise policing will inevitably fail to meet community needs, for several different reasons. It is fairly well established that a lack of contact between police and members of the community results in an increase in crime, for a few reasons but in particular because the community will stop reporting crimes to the police if they do not have positive interactions with them. This has been a widespread problem in most if not all US cities.

In practice, the portion of people that police interact with who receive any sort of legal action (from citation to arrest) is very small. Around 2% in one field services division. The vast majority of police interactions are either addressed by policework (collecting information, brokering agreements, just telling people to knock it off) or were not even potentially criminal in nature to begin with (traffic accidents, medical emergencies, etc). These are all cases of officers acting as individuals to address a problem, with no criminal process involved.

> If you're ever talking to a police officer you're obligated to follow their lawful commands, and if you have any issue with them the forum to litigate that is court not with the police or through something like a net promoter score.

It sounds more like you're talking about a prosecutor. Police officers exercise a great deal of discretion and individual responsibility outside of the legal system, and are accountable to the police department for their work. Police departments have an entire command or division, usually more than one in practice, responsible for reviewing officer actions and conduct. Police departments are organized under city and state governments (and occasionally some other less common kinds of governments like improvement districts), and are accountable as a whole to the government they derive their authority from. That is, while courts do serve as an ultimate forum for complaints about police, courts generally only address specific violations of the law. Broader policing issues are heard out in the chambers of city councils and legislatures.

> If anything the experience of the people not interacting with the police aka the broader community IS the thing to optimize for. Maybe mail out surveys and ask people where the police are doing well and where they could be more helpful.

This is a standard practice in large police departments and is usually more formalized through e.g. commissions and councils of community members. Surveys themselves often originate from the city government in its role overseeing the police, e.g. conducted by the mayor or council members.
Not a native but for a good while I thought that "breaking news" was TV specific term meaning "we need to break the regular things that were about to be shown because we've got this last minute urgent thing to tell" (think: 9/11, president died etc)

Wikipedia seems to agree:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breaking_news
Children in schools with more traffic noise show slower cognitive development
For "what" -- I don't specify. Regarding "how I know", I start with several premises:

1) search engines are the dominant way to find information now.

2) conservatively, ≥80% of searches in US are through google.

3) google is not a passive observer of user search queries, but instead actively suggests queries to users.

It follows that there must be some impact. The "engagement" effect is this: I start a search for Depeche Mode, but get distracted by suggestions for J Depp. In contrast, DDG suggests Depakote, Depression, Dept of Revenue and a few other things. Other search engines seem to be less aggressive.
I wish they had prepended "Breaking News: " to the title of this story.
Only 92 people were sentenced for marijuana possession in the federal system in 2017, out of a total of nearly 20,000 drug convictions. That's about 0.5%

0. https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/research-and-pu...
The consequences of climate change in the Alps are visible from space
Or before a nasty storm blew in and damaged the airship.
> I think H2 in a tank is more stable. You could move it over a great distance without losing energy I think.

How are you going to move it without using any energy? Is that massive barge just going to move to shore and back using zero-point energy? Is the gas going to compress itself using that same zero-point energy source? Are we just going to ignore the much higher maintenance costs of all the moving parts of the ship and compressors and tank repairs versus the lower maintenance costs of fixed and stable solid infrastructure?
I think this is why some people have made whole successful careers in sub-niches of curated news: John Oliver, Fareed Zakaria, etc. etc.

When you watch something that one of them makes, they (or someone connected to them) have creative control over the curation, and it gets attached to their reputation.

So, if I hear something on CNN, I have near zero indication about its quality. As a result, I don't read or watch CNN literally ever, unless some other curated source refers it to me for some reason.

But if I watch John Oliver or Fareed Zakaria, I know there's going to be a much higher than usual standard for quality of curation, analysis, interest/relevance, etc.
> It may seem frivolous, but it is a key to successful projects, whether as a consulting org or internal enterprise development.

Sorry, but neither of those things usually require a product manager because neither of them involve building a product.

The role of product manager is basically THE key difference between building custom software and building a product.

When you're building custom software, you have a specific user who is paying you to solve a specific problem for them. The only measure of success is whether you solve their problem (within time/money budget). For these kinds of things, you're right, it's absolutely critical that the person with the problem and the person solving the problem work closely together.

When you're really building a new product, you won't even have any users and you won't have anyone paying you who's defining success for you. Someone on your team needs to figure out who are the customers you're trying to target, what problems are we trying to solve for them, how can we solve those problems in a way that's generic enough for us to sell it to multiple customers, etc. That's all legwork that a (good) product manager should be doing because, again, no one is proactively defining it for the team.
You can't download any addon for Firefox on iOS because it's almost Safari, only looking a bit different. All browsers on iOS has to use WebKit so FF is not really FF here on iOS.
The tamagui base starter repo is a monorepo with typescript, react native and web all working together[0] which you can get running with by simply doing:

npx create-tamagui-app@latest

[0] https://github.com/tamagui/starters/tree/main/next-expo-soli...
Still depends on the developer keeping the app available and runnable on modern devices.
Shouldn’t the title be
Svelvet: A component library…
Modern hydroponics are certainly not perpetual motion machines. The difference is that you can collect all of the unused nutrients below the plant and recycle them back into the input stream. Secondly, you can elevate the carbon dioxide levels because it's an enclosed system and encourage plants to grow faster. Finally, the enclosed nature more easily permits integrated pest management, which reduces total pesticide requirements...of course, herbicides are not required at all because of the way hydroponics grow.

It's not perfect, but it's exceptionally more productive than field agriculture.
You're not seeing the bigger picture. Within developers, you have the 10x developers. But within that, there is the 100x developer... all of a company's success can be attributed to a 500kg neckbeard in the basement powered by a caffeine-adderall intravenous drip (for playing video games, all the actual work is outsourced to that one guy in Afghanistan => https://www.theonion.com/more-american-workers-outsourcing-o...)
The Sem Cubed system is an interesting take on indexing information for memorisation https://www.ludism.org/mentat/SemCubed
We don’t have a written constitution, so if you remove all the pomp and tradition it’s highly likely some things do actually go wrong as people forget they’re meant to happen.
Discreet Launcher takes a zen approach --- it really excels at simplicity but some things may not be immediately obvious.

I encourage you to take just a little time to explore what it has to offer. It may not do everything just the way you want ... but over time, I think you'll find it does everything you really need.

Swipe down for Favorites --- Swipe up for All Apps.

Favorites can be arranged in any order you want.

Folders can be created on the All Apps screen to group apps by type. I have folders for Banking, Security, Utilities, Games, etc..

I have used other launchers and am well aware that others do more --- too much more. Over time, I tend to forget how to manipulate everything and end up fighting the launcher. Discreet is simple enough that I can hold it all in my head and make good use of it when I need to. And I have never found a show stopping bug in it.

The biggest compliment I can give Discreet is to say that I can't think of any feature other launchers offer that I really miss. Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
It takes plenty of energy and effort to move tanks.

And the actual electrolysis plant could be made within a mile of the shore if you're worried about how you'll supply water.
Well, that made me laugh.

Thanks for the chuckle, CNN.
How are you using "far left" in this instance?
High side? If I am understanding OP correctly he says one only has 30 years to "make it in live" or you're fucked and if I am understanding you correctly you think that is too high. If that is the case both of you are wrong.
I disagree, because the statute is about protecting fish and wildlife; protecting fish inherently implies protecting the environment of fish; water. There is obvious practical sense in defining fish to include any sort of animal that lives in the water, as all amphibians (including toads) do for at least part of their lives.

The court followed the law as it was written, which is good. And there is nothing inherently wrong with the law classifying all invertebrates as fish; many invertebrates are fish in the folk taxonomical sense, and there's no harm in accidentally pulling in wholly terrestrial vertebrates like bees.

But was the classification of bees as fish an accident? It doesn't matter; the law is what it is and the court decided correctly. But, nevertheless, we can still wonder whether it was an accident. I think it was. All the categories of animal categorized as fish by this law have a strong connection to water. What are they?

> wild fish, mollusk, crustacean, invertebrate, amphibian

"Wild fish" are obviously fish.

Crustaceans are sometimes terrestrial, but most are fish.

Amphibians are all characteristically aquatic early in life, and look like fish. Some remain aquatic their entire lives.

Mollusks are sometimes terrestrial (garden snails), but the majority of mollusks are aquatic and mollusks are the largest marine phylum, making up a plurality of all named aquatic animals. The mollusks people in America like the most, and consequently think about the most, are all seafood.

Invertebrates.. that's the contentious one. Technically, if not legally, invertebrates include all mollusks, as well as jellyfish, corals, sea anenomes, worms, etc. A whole lot of invertebrates are aquatic animals. It seems to me that if a well intentioned but busy lawmaker were trying to make a list colloquially defined fish (animals that live in the water), invertebrates could easily get roped into this list (along with toads, and terrestrial crustraceans.)

Notably missing from this list of fish are types of animals that are rarely or never aquatic; it doesn't list squirrels as fish probably because one does not think of water when they think of squirrels. But if the lawmakers had been prompted to think of beavers, perhaps they would have written rodents into their definition of fish.

Does or should it matter to the court? No, I don't think so. They should and did go by what the law said. But that doesn't mean HN commenters can't or shouldn't discuss what we think the lawmakers actually meant when they wrote this.
> China will have all the food and oil they need via Russia and they'll get it cheap

my latest conspiracy is that china conned russia into getting embroiled in a war via bad intelligence in order to:

A : evaluate western response and capabilities

B : bottom out the cost of russian food and fuel for their own benefit
Using reddit as a gauge of public opinion blows my mind, especially coming from CNN whose industry means they should know better. People in entertainment and marketing love reddit, but they will tell you flat out its not because of it being a measure of public opinion, but of it being an excellent marketing tool with many opportunities and successes. Its not hard to get a few posts viral in a niche interest subreddit, and have your product practically ordained by the community as a result. It's a marketers forum, and has been that way since the digg migration brought in plenty of fish, if not earlier.
I used to really look up to him. But he chose to hang out with a convicted child sex abuser, so now I really question whether somebody with, at the very least, extremely poor judgement and empathy should be leading philanthropic missions. I'd rather just have the gov't tax him and have us vote on how to use that money (I understand that doesn't always work in reality, but at least it works in theory, whereas a guy who hangs out with sex traffickers is not somebody I want talking about how to help 'women in poverty in the third world').
Maybe check out mochi.cards?
I've tried many techniques for seasoning over thirty years of cooking, after inheriting my grandparents' cast iron cookware and purchasing some of my own. It's anecdotal, but I'll share it anyway.

I do it on my pellet stove outside (I used to use the oven, but the smell/smoke is not pleasant in the house). Preheat to 375F. Coat the pan (inside, outside, handle...the whole thing) in a THIN layer of oil. I use rapeseed oil or avocado oil. The point is to use one with a high smoke point. I have also used peanut oil.

Put the pan in upside down for an hour. Remove it, cover with another THIN coat of oil. Back in the oven. Another hour. Remove it, coat it, and back in the oven for a third hour. During the third hour, dice a red onion. When the pan comes out, put it on a burner over medium heat and cook the onions in the same oil you used to season the pan. This will remove any "metallic" flavor the pan had, and will perform some magic on how non-stick the seasoning is. I don't know how or why this works, but it does. Cook the onions until they're basically burned, then discard them.

I do this once a year for all of my pans and the seasoning holds up easily through a year of heavy use.

I wash the pans by hand with no soap (if you deglaze the pan after cooking, this is much easier) and I avoid soaking water in the pan. If I have a stubborn something stuck to the pan, I'll boil some water in the pan for a few minutes, then wash it.

After washing it, I put it on the burner on medium-high heat until all the water evaporates, turn off the heat, then coat the pan with a thin layer of cooking oil, shortening, or lard using a paper towel. Now the pan is ready for next time, and it won't rust in the meantime.

EDIT: I use the same method listed above for my carbon steel cookware as well, and it's just as effective for those.
Yes, there are levels of QA. But QA, at its most difficult is also software development, but for the most part, is not.

I would say, that on average, QA is a lower skilled profession than software development. If I were to make an analogy, QA is the nurse to the developer's doctor.

And, yes, it is a lower tier. You hire developers before QA and fire QA before developers. But, like you said, it deserves respect. Just like all professions. And I'd say that a competent QA staff is the sign of a successful organization. Because while you can have your developers test, it's better to move those responsibilities off their plate so they can focus on their core work. Just like you could have your employees take out the trash and sweep up, but once you're beyond the "5 people in a garage" setup, you're going to hire a cleaning service.

To the point of the higher up comments.

It is an issue. Even if QA were more difficult, challenging, etc than development, we can't get around the fact that it is perceived as supplemental to development. It is a place where organizations put people who want to be developers but the organization doesn't want to be developers. Or a dumping ground for 1x developers. And it seems, a way to tweak diversity numbers without actually doing anything.
I have retroboy[1] installed. I got it from fdroid. I like it. It also has several other filters, for C64, Apple classic Mac, Amstrad CPC464 among others. Lots of settings to play with.

[1] https://github.com/mikljohansson/retroboy
I've been a FairEmail user for a long time, and the product is fantastic, and I'm very happy this got worked out. FairEmail has always been excellent at explaining settings and their privacy ramifications, and I'm hoping that Google's switch to oauth doesn't break Fair Email's ability to check both my work profile email and home email google accounts.

It's absolutely deflating when an app gets removed from a store, and a lot of times the rejection messages are terse and hard to make sense out of, and honestly, the developer has a lot invested in their app.
Diversification across asset classes.

Physical cash is terrible but to an investor, "cash" tends to mean something like t-bills, which over the past century have done slightly better than inflation. Gold is horrible if you have too much of it, but it tends to do well in equity crashes, so mixing in a little can be helpful. Bonds also sometimes do well when stocks go down, though I think that's more likely when you start at higher interest rates. Commodities can have 15-year bull markets independent of everything else. An investor in Japan would have done fine if they had a lot of foreign stocks. Etc.
The issue with a handicap is that if you win you don't feel as good because you know that the only reason you won was the handicap. It's harder to draw such a conclusion when you win due to randomness.
>> Opinion pieces are strewn throughout regular news links

> Sometimes I wonder if some folks want news, or just something to confirm their biases.

Many people just want their biases confirmed, which is pretty clear if you ever take a look at newspaper comment sections.
+1 I've been using RWJS for the past 2 years and would recommend giving it a try:

> yarn create redwood-app my-redwood-project --typescript
I cant edit the post, hence posting an update

I guess this has brought the attention at the Google. The verification is done. I was able to renew immediately. The site is up and running now. I am going to transfer this domain too under porkbun.
I've been using iubenda to do this for my products.
I just hope they take Don "pandering propaganda" Lemon off the air. Hard to take them seriously as a news source when you see that show.
> I would rather encourage engineers to get involved and understand the domain and the project than rely on this role.

What confidence do you have that an engineer would be less lossy in this role? It's a full-time thing when done right.
tldr is already available and cheat looks like a fork of it.

check it out: sudo apt install tldr

imagine that!
The more pressing issue with land ownership in the UK is that we don't even know who owns large chunks of it.
No, CNN is closer to National Enquirer than MSNBC is toward the left.
I think most things will sound satirical if you rewrite a non-hypocritical statement to sound hypocritical.
Feel free to read : https://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/sites/constitution-u...

The queen has been effectively stripped of all personal discretion when it comes to the use of her reserve powers.

She has no real choice when it comes to who is appointed prime minister or which bills are made into law.

The voters and elected officials make those decisions, and her only real job is give a royal stamp of approval.
Could this just be selection bias? Clearly the older works that people are still talking about are pretty special. This is sort of addressed in the "top cited papers" section. But I think a better metric would be something like "are papers that we'll still be discussing in 20 years still being published." Hard to say until 20 years goes by.
"What is art?"
Pretty much, yeah. I'm acknowledging that it is possible the person with numerous DUIs is an alcoholic and that, once drunk, the intent necessary for a knowing crime is no longer really there. The logic of 'chose to get drunk so chose the consequences' doesn't work if the person has a disease causing them to continuously drink.
You can rent a high-end TIC from Home Depot for about $100/day. I found all kinds of bad insulation and air leaks in my house. I could claim the rental paid for itself but it was so much fun scanning things the entertainment value was worth the price.
turn on showdead and just vouch the now-flagged-and-dead comment. people who flag stuff like that aren't interested in discussion.
Giraffes may be long-necked for fights, not just food
If the network was amiable to increasing the number of miner contracts per block, wouldn't they have done it already?

Transaction speed and cost is already a regular criticism of the Bitcoin network. It's so much of a criticism that the Bitcoin community made the Lightning Network and started pulling transactions off-chain and pooling them to address that concern.

But they didn't collectively decide to increase the number of allowed miner contracts. They literally built a second network rather than change the max block size.

And in fact it was not only not accepted, it was a big source of controversy to even try to increase the block size. That was the whole deal with Bitcoin Cash, people were outright hostile to this idea.