skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Been doing web development for 25 years, I am currently learning Rust in hope that I can compile to Web Assembly and build SPAs that way. The JavaScript ecosystem is a mess of module systems, type systems, layers upon layers of libraries and build tools and building a web app that is actually maintainable, consistent and extensible is difficult to impossible. We need better tooling than what is currently considered standard.
> For all the "Baby formula shortage" media coverage, how many stories have included a recipe for alternatives to commercial formula?

Well, the reality is there isn't a good one. If there was, this issues wouldn't be so serious. Infant formula is truly a modern marvel - an accurate enough representation of breast milk. It lacks certain things (like antibodies), but can absolutely provide an infant correct nutrition.
Too put things in perspective, toddler formula - which is very, very similar is considered a dangerous substitute since it does not contain the exact correct ratios and can lead to health issues.

To answer you question, the media does not have a recommendation because there simply isn't a good, safe recommendation.
Don't forget IPOs and stock issuance. Loans. Lookup "biotech microcap stocks" for more examples.
I think the biggest difference here is the lack of LCD buttons on the duckyPad.

People are able to identify icons quicker and better than they are the right key to press to get a certain action, in the case of the duckyPad.

Plus, the Stream Deck allows you to create folders, so you can technically get very complicated workflows on the S/D versus the duckyPad.

Just a thought.
Hint: when Graham and Morris developed Viaweb, there were no such things as templates and plugins.

This isn't to say your site isn't cool; and an all-in-one approach is maybe a good idea in 2022. But claiming it's a "fresh approach" with "no plugins and no template install" on Hacker News is a bit ironic given its founders.
Do you have actual examples of these “examples”? Like, a list of drugs and procedures that fit case 1. and 2.? Or did you just make this up?
First off, the access to instruction from Pixar is invaluable (though it will cost $250 for adults, $25 for kids). Second it's pen & paper based, you scan in the frames individually to render the final animation. Classic, craft based, just like Walt did it. Having a class that forces you to do animation, and then submit for peer critique will create an incredible showcase for emerging talent. But what makes it special to me, is that they are attempting a masterclass in Storytelling.
Yup. They were only interesting to me for 2-3 years. :-)
I got one as a gift and was a bit skeptical of it too as a programmer that does most of the work in code with vim commands but have come around on it.

useful to have as a clock/date for a few locations at a glance. opens up some apps too but the main thing I use it for is having a few reference docs that you can open up with a button. window layout buttons are nice too. the other thing I use it for is setting brighness on the screen and locking the screen. Not sure I'd buy one but they are neat to have if you get one as a gift.
Update: this is now live! If you navigate to a legacy path w/o a #, it will redirect you on load to the new router protected by the #. This was a great idea for privacy, and I really appreciated this feedback.

Please give it a go and let me know if it works for you, if you get the chance. Thanks!
One trick is to star fixing typos. It's short and they will probably get merged, and you will learn what are the informal rules of the repository. (Do you have to sign your commit? Write a nice message? Spaces vs tabs? Add a test case in case you change the code?)

Also, don't underestimate how helpful is to fill a nice bug report with foolproof reproduction steps. And in case someone else fix the bug, it's good to take a look and try to understand the code, so next time perhaps you can fix a similar bug.
EV Charging: Scan QR code at eye level, cable drops from top of telephone pole
A helpful way to think about security is with a threat model, where you consider who the threat actors are, what they're trying to achieve, and what their resources are.

Your aim shouldn't be perfect security, but just security which is good enough that an attacker would have to spend more money on breaching your defences than the value of whatever they would gain from doing so.

Another way of looking at it is the through the analogy of the two hikers who see a tiger, and one of the hikers decides to change into some running shoes. "You can't outrun a tiger!" "I don't have to, I just have to outrun you".

In a sense, security improves one hack at a time, and as long as you are doing your due diligence and being more secure than your peers/competitors, you will be doing your bit towards improving the average security of the internet.
> as long as i, i+1, i+2, i+3, ... i+7 are not dependent on each other

I really don't see how that works in improving this.

You can only calculate i+8, for calculating i+9 you depend on 8. And you can't go in strides either since i+16 depends on i+15 which you've not calculated so far unless you want to intermix the stateful and non-stateful code. I'd rather not go there.
> bear markets tend to be much briefer than bull markets.

Is this because governments are quick to drop rates and add QE but slow to do the opposite?
If I knew for a fact that I'd get terminal cancer by the time I was a young adult, I'd certainly prefer to have never been born. What a miserable life that would almost certainly be, for myself, those who got to know me and then lose me, and for those I would be dependent on.

This, I hope, is another step we take towards near-eradication of genetic diseases. And good riddance
I'm not that keen on that. Odds are that when the plastic is broken down, it'd be broken down into CO2. we're much better off just locking all that carbon away underground. If anything, we'd be better off with some micro-organism that turned CO2 into some type of hydrocarbon.
LITERALLY children.
No the computer would have been unlikely to be able to figure out the math to coalesce 8 recursive additions into one operation.
In Denmark almost everyone born with a genetic disease was a false negative: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/12/the-las...

Will be interesting to see how these passive eugenics affects humanity centuries from now from a gene pool standpoint.
Err, my last statement refers to what I think happens if you replaced R410a with R290 without further changes.
Association lists have some obvious downsides – if they didn't, Common Lisp-style keywords would have never been invented.

One is that keywords are simpler syntax – `(foo :bar 1 :baz 0) is easier on the eyes than its association list equivalent.

Another is that their native implementation (linear search) can be a performance drain if you use them too heavily in an application (especially if you have too many keys). It is a data structure which optimises for insertion over retrieval, but most applications retrieve much more than they insert. The ability to "shadow" (have multiple bindings for the same key, with the first being used and the subsequent being ignored, but potentially becoming active again when the earlier binding is removed) is useful in some cases, but more often than not an unnecessary feature, more likely to induce bugs than be genuinely beneficial – "shadowing" by accident rather than intention.

A sufficiently smart runtime could optimise around some of these issues (this looks an association list, I'll use some optimised data structure to store it, but fall back on a more traditional cons-cell based storage if you try to do with it things the optimised data structure doesn't support.) But, having an actually separate data type enables equivalent performance optimisations, without anywhere near as much "smartness" in the runtime (which can be difficult to understand and maintain.) Plus, that kind of "smartness" can lead to difficult to understand performance regressions (why does adding this new code suddenly make completely unrelated parts of the application a lot slower?)
Thank you! You are too kind.

FYI this is now deployed and live, the privacy point was huge and I wanted to make it clear that this is CSR only, and the # was perfect. Now if you route to a legacy path i.e. without a #, you will be redirected to the memlink protected behind the #.

I will still work on a privacy policy that outlines these things :) Thank you again for the great feedback.
They're simply skewers that can't be removed by a standard wrench, but instead require a weird wrench with a semi-unique combination.

Could you still hack one? Sure, given time and forethought, but every other bike near you will have quick-release or regular hex nuts.
How would less legislation force any change?
You're willing to believe that China hides the true extent of its problem. I can't argue with you there, because such a conspiracy theory is not easily falsifiable.

So compare America to other the liberal democracies in the G8. It will remain an aberration and horrific outlier.
While the duckpad and other firmware alterable keyboards are great, they are still limited to being configured to perform keypresses of a keyboard or a few other functions (like MIDI support in QMK). The "complex software" of the Elgato lets it do more complex things.
Yes definitely a valid point. For my case I used TypeScript and made a typed array of objects (with recursive definitions to arrays of the same) that cold be arranged and processed like an S-Expression. This typing and having named elements in the objects really hit the sweet spot for me while still being able to process the list/array in a functional/recursive way.
You can get prescription lenses for VR headsets, I see no reason why you wouldn't be able to do the same for AR headsets. AR is most likely going to be done via passthrough anyways so it's not like the lenses have to be some kind of special integrated device, just a lens that can be whatever prescription you need.
Way back in the 90s I was using AWESOME fully mapped WACOM tablets for AUTOCAD...

Eveyr command was basically on the tablet, and in the center was the screen area...

There was a printed menu-matrix configured for autocad...

It made drawing so fast (I finished second in the National CAD Olympics in ~1993 and finished a 3 hour test in in 30 minutes.)

For years this device made me extremely fast on CAD.

The muscle memory for the location of certain items, coupled with the custom keyboard shortcuts for all other autocad commands could be done with being mostly mapped to keys close to the left hand placement...

I miss those tablets. I should get another one.

The point is that if you can know what core functions you want on the extra input real-estate... you can make your workflow very streamlined.
Usually just when I am having trouble with an idosyncratic number scale. So usually when I need to make sense of dates and the time between them. It's often got nothing to do with work, but I do use them in my personal life.
If you use their app you can scan everything with your phone too. The just use tap to pay to complete the transaction. IMO it's a great innovation.
Why would it be in anything but registers?
These are subjective opinions. The point stands that Android not being around wouldn’t have made the world that much worse off, if at all.
We don't actively block any functionality when a user blocks telemetry -- that's definitely an unintended side effect and bug. You'll have more luck disabling telemetry in the config file with `default['firezone']['telemetry']['enabled'] = false` documented here: https://docs.firezone.dev/docs/reference/configuration-file/

We could definitely clarify how to disable telemetry better and we should make sure nothing breaks when telemetry is blackholed instead of disabled. I've opened https://github.com/firezone/firezone/pull/658 to get these addressed.
I am not a security expert, but we accept imperfection in everything.

We do not know that the bridge we are on will not fall down. We do not know that the aircraft we are on will not fall out of the sky. We do not know that we will not be misdiagnosed by a doctor. Most "obvious" processes and procedures had to have a body count behind them to get implemented.
Most importantly-- it shares the foundational feature of having such a small publishing cost that it creates a paradigm shift in how we are able to self-organize.

That's one thing that bothered and confused the cranks with burgeoning Wikipedia. Why does the Pokemon article have a longer page than one on the Vietnam War? The priorities are out of wack, they thought, without realizing that the lack of scarcity in a web page (well, technically a scroll) and low friction of revisions ends up changing the process of editing an encyclopedia for length.

It's similar for Bitcoin. Cranks on HN always want to to downplay it's 3-orders-of-magnitude superior transaction speed to Visa/Mastercard by pointing out the much smaller value being transacted. One million microtransactions for a grand total of $1000, they say, without realizing that it's the types of transactions these (often automated) payments support which simply aren't possible using the old payment paradigm.

Without the scale and speed of microtransactions Bitcoin makes possible, you don't just end up with a less effective National Association of Independent Investigative Units. Games in Geocities 2 don't just get a little bit laggy. FOSSmobiles don't just take a little longer to update their FOSStertainment panels. You simply end up with a world where none of that stuff exists.

Oh wait I forgot Bitcoin doesn't work like that. Still, we've got Sci-hub donations and that one ransomware that apparently donates to charities. So not so different, really.
To your point, a couple+ years ago I read that internationally, more people die prematurely from consuming too much "food" than not enough.

Mind you that might now change. Nonetheless no one panicked when too much "food" was the problem.
I think the idea of making acquaintance with people in one's community is what has held society together historically, and the derision for human interaction with others (shopping, eating, pub, etc) is the downfall of civil society.
You might want to start your FAQ by saying what a webring is. Not everyone was around in the late 90s.
Trump is clearly incompetent. Twitter is clearly bias.

Nothing new under the sun, lol.
When it comes to internal services that don't implement auth or have inadequate auth support, there are several projects out there that act as a reverse proxy and handle auth, only passing requests through once authentication is complete.

You can use this with Home Assistant's local IP auth (that just bypasses auth and assigns everything to a single HA user) so you don't have redundant auth mechanisms.
I don’t have high expectations for Seattle springs but this year has been ridiculous.
This is very very similar to something developed by SIDN labs called "DNS Resolution Required", you can read the blog post here:

https://www.sidnlabs.nl/en/news-and-blogs/dns-resolution-req...
I want to make crystal clear that my comments are 100% in a pragmatic way, as a project it is awesome and very enriching. Kudos to the OP.
How are your math skills? Do you know any calculus? Are you interested in learning more math to go with the physics?
People lock their bikes... just using the ring lock in general. If only because you need to put the key in to unlock the ring lock (and ride the bike) and then when you're somewhere if you don't lock it your key is just on the bike.

Of course it's a tiny ring lock. It's to stop unmotivated people and also people just taking the wrong bike. But works well enough.

Probably not 100% but "no one locks their bike" is incorrect.
How 'bout two XLs? Soo many buttons!
Precisely. My trust in a non-ECC machine is much lower. I've had slow on-disk data corruption that I've tracked down to failing memory in retail-grade hardware, and it's been in a collection of large media files being sync'ed between machines. Those corruptions tend to be un-noticed at the time, and are effectively impossible (without original sources) to resolve later on, but happily also tend to have minimal impact.

Either way, I've been using computers longer than TFA and wouldn't build a home lab box without ECC.
It's sad to see how Chamath has escaped the same level of attention, he's easily the #1 pandemic grifter.
> I'd certainly prefer to have never been born.

What if your parents found out when you were 12 months old? Would you wish that they had euthanised you at that age, before you were really self-aware, and before they got too emotionally attached to (or financially invested in) you?
I don't know why you are being downvoted when you are entirely correct. It is this type of use of stats that give cheap ammunition to skeptics. For the downvoters, I guess if May 1st is hotter than usual, you're happy to claim the entirety of May will be hotter than usual?
Ben Felix did a video "Chasing Top Fund Managers":

> Seeing people around you pouring money into a hot fund that only seems to get hotter can make sticking with any previously well-thought-out investing strategy difficult. As if your diversified portfolio only returned 10% last year when you could have earned 200% in the best fund. While each hot fund manager will seem brilliant at their peak, the phenomenon of star fund managers, including their powerful narratives, huge returns, and media adoration, is nothing new, and it’s not a story that tends to end well for investors.

* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6HrepdLSu4

Basically: Cathy Wood and Ark were/are nothing new. Over the decades there have been many such fund managers. The video was a summary of a longer (1h) podcast episode he did on the topic:

> When you see funds performing monumentally well, you may feel regretful for not investing in them earlier. There is, however, a long history of funds that skyrocketed only to have major falls from grace a brief period after. The bulk of today’s episode is spent exploring this idea in the portfolio topic section but before getting into that, we kick the show off with some updates. We begin by talking about the GameStop short and whether this casts any new light on the concept of market efficiency. From there, we take a look at some recent news, particularly one story about the meteoric growth of New York-based investment managers ARK Invest, who recently hit $50B in assets under management up from $3B this time last year. This story acts as a great segue into the portfolio topic where Ben traces a history of funds that performed colossally well for a brief period but then plummeted thereafter. These funds were under the direction of ‘star’ fund managers with a focus on investing in tech disruptors. The discussion acts as a cautionary tale about overpaying for growth leading to poor realized returns. For the planning topic, we continue to shine a light on the ‘Talking Cents’ card game, a financial literacy outreach strategy created by The University of Chicago Financial Education Initiative. We invite the director of the Financial Education Initiative, Rebecca Maxcy, onto the show to speak about some of the thinking around this project and then discuss a few of the questions posed by the cards ourselves. Tune in today!

* https://rationalreminder.ca/podcast/136

* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhluPwDaNAQ

Bunch of links to the research papers he mentions/cites.

Basically: top managers do have some skill, but as the fund gets bigger it takes more skill to out-perform the market. The problems with many managers really start arising with 'open' funds where anyone can throw in money: generally these people 'run out of runway'. Whatever skill they may have eventually gets overwhelmed.

It's probably why Renaissance Technologies' (RenTec's) Medallion Fund can get such great returns: closed to everyone except a select few, and even then the fund limits its size to 'only' US$ 10B, and 'excess' money has to be removed. They realized whatever they're doing can't scale.
> Would it be possible to host a single _bit_ on the web that I KNEW could not be hacked, exploited, MITM'd?

If you don't accept or deal with any user input, third party websites or state maintenance; EG entirely static content. Then yes it is possible. But as soon as you start incorporating content that isn't static, like ads or scraping from another website/content, or user input or a database, then no. There are certainly ways to keep your security high and prevent most types of run of the mill exploits. It's a very broad area and entirely different methods of protection, based on say a cross site scripting exploit, server side forgery, or man in the middle attack. OWASP top ten - https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/ is a great resource to learn about website risk and how to improve your security.
> You're willing to believe that China hides the true extent of its problem. I can't argue with you there, because such a conspiracy theory is not easily falsifiable.

Maybe. I was more thinking along the lines that they don't blast the idea that attacking a school is something you can do into everyone's faces. It's not very good situation that every susceptible person in America is very familiar with the idea that attacking a school is an option they have.

Media safety is another thing we need to be talking about, so all effective actions can be taken to deal with this problem. This wall-to-wall publicity will likely cause more gruesome deaths, and probably already has.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/mass-shootings-ar...:

> The investigators applied a mathematical model and found that shootings that resulted in at least four deaths launched a period of contagion, marked by a heightened likelihood of more bloodshed, lasting an average of 13 days.
Thank you for the great suggestion! I'll take that on board and add something to the FAQ.
> Baby formula isn't some magical combination of ingredients.

This is overlooking an incredibly important piece - composition and reliability. Infants, particularly those under 6 months, have very specific nutritional needs. A subset of that population has extremely strict nutritional needs. Even in a health baby, "stretching" the formula with too much water can cause a dangerous drop in electrolyte levels.

For the average person, it's going to be extremely difficult to source, process, mix, and hydrate ingredients (and test it all) to properly feed their baby.

----

To put things in perspective, toddler formula is _extremely_ similar to infant formula, but the ratios are slightly different. This slightly difference means you cannot safely use toddler formula as a replacement for infant formula.
I worked on a team of about 20-25 devs. We used the Digitalk toolset, using Team/V for source control. You opened a repository/package browser instead of a class browser. There was versioning at all levels and good package management.
The pipelining issue is interesting because my reaction becomes “shouldn’t the CPU just come with a larger vector size and then operate on chunks within the vector to optimize pipelining?” but then I realize I’m just describing a GPU.
Which is associated with anemia in infants....
Not to mention the idea that anyone could live in Florida before air conditioning.
An Understandable Failing?
Which is why it's good we have recorded data to refute or support our memories.
Almost same thing. Khan Academy is amazing.