skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Without democracy in the workplace and collectivisation the economic forces are purely on the side of the employer. We're taught that individual action is the only way to improve one's situation in life, but it's impossible for this to improve living standards at a societal level. Workers coming together is the only way employees can have real leverage.
Klaus Roewe to Join Lilium as CEO
Sorry should have clarified - we are a government organization that interacts with a number of other government agencies. It's simply not feasible for us to implement SSO for all of our own internal applications (many different units/teams), let alone the external apps/systems we are consumers of.
Finally someone said it.

There was a reason for the office. As an employer I can tell you most (not all) workers are not able to properly contribute remotely.

Some jobs further require people to be together to properly collaborate.

Communication is already very hard already, and “Out of sight, out of mind” is a real thing.

I hope more companies insist workers come back to the office and end the madness of everyone demanding remote work.

In principle remote is doable but in practice most humans are easily distracted and we will be distracted.
He spends a lot of time posting memes on twitter for someone who supposedly lives in the factory.
Seems a bit unavoidable when you have the most efficient society even in creating artificial desires and enabling them through easy loans.

Combined with literally rent-seeking and the expectation that real-estate with always increase in value, seem to be a perfect recipe for longterm misery.
Not having an office makes the company much more flexible.
- They can hire anywhere.
- Adding / removing employees is much cheaper
- Most business are already prepared for their employees to work from everywhere.
Yeah, they're probably keeping the people who allow them to automate and are laying off the people who, otherwise, need to do the work manually / semi-manually when there is no automation.

Anytime you automate something that someone is doing manually, and you're automating it so well, there's a good chance what you build might replace the people doing it.
I just explained to you that, if you had watched the video, it would be obvious that he's not just pressing a button to start a sequence. Your response was to again falsely claim that he is pushing a button to start a sequence, when in reality, he is manually playing all of the drums and notes in the exact same way that you play your instruments, and in the exact same way your video portrays. So he's actually doing the same thing and more than what you claim is "real" musicianship. I have never heard a musician speak so disparagingly about another musician in the way you are right now. It's disturbing and completely inappropriate.
Which value and recognition are you talking about? Their papers are almost never cited [0].

Soldiers, and defense in general, are part of the main things a government should provide (we can discuss how much, but that is another discussion).

I am not sure why you say nurses cannot produce salaries. Nurses work in the private sector and provide substantial value.

I do not have it in for academics specifically. In fact, I used to be one. What I am saying is that they are mostly disposable and think of themselves as some superior value.

In the UK in particular, education used to be tuition-free. Now they are running more as a business. I do not see the point of forcing subsidies on people who produce something that not even other academics are interested in. You are basically paying people to sit in a room and discuss something by themselves. Why does a minimum wage worker have to subsidies that? We are all getting hit by inflation, some more than others. Academia is a job with zero risk involved. I don't think it is fair to keep subsidising the dream of a few while having so many better uses for the money, or even reducing the tax burden on society.

[0] https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2014/04/23/ac...
I’m not living paycheck to paycheck since I’ve been lucky with my company, but I do somehow spend an entire high six figure salary and I live very well but not lavishly.

I guess I’m wondering if others here follow the same model of spend the dollars and save the stock.
I have not used PageRank to rank search results but to detect monitoring sensors in P2P botnets as part of my master thesis and it worked pretty well. It is quite effective in detecting sensors and the only way to prevent detection is to reduce incoming edges, thereby requiring many sensors to monitor a large botnet.

So the algorithm is still useful not only for search results.
The free TomTom android app is great! Cannot recommend enough.
$300/mo is $3,600 a year or two months of medical debt payments.

If your rent increase was $500/year, I'm guessing you are spending a lot more money on eating out than you realize. Take a moment to pull your statements for the last two or three months and analyze how much spending is going into each category.
That seems to be a common issue. I put "!!! Make changes below !!!" above the User Value column, but if you scroll straight down to the Theme row, you may miss that. Perhaps I could swap the User Value and Default Value column or pop up a message if the user edits the Default Value column.
> best recruitment (most applicants for similar roles)

I don't think 'number of applicants' is a good way of measuring 'best recruitment', or that 'best recruitment' is a meaningful counter when talking about conditions of people currently employed there.
> The reality is my options are slim. Maybe I could get a roommate but I shouldn’t have too making as much as I do and at the point in my life I am at

This is the entitlement. You have options that you refuse to take that would significantly help due to some weird standard.
Selling Netscape's server group to AOL was just sadistic punishment.
That is orthogonal to what language implementations can do, failure to education doesn't change what tools are available.
The irony of being weirdly combative about the anodyne observation that "being right isn’t an excuse to forgo social expectations".
> With fiat you still have those technical limitations (someone could create indistinguishable counterfeit money and dump it on the market).

I think there is more than technological limitations to making this happen. Not only is counterfeiting considered a major crime by the state (who has a monopoly on violence), but the amount of "money" in circulation that has a physical representation is dwarfed by "money" that does not. Even if you doubled the physical currency in circulation you'd only increase the "monetary supply" by 10% or so. Plus there are huge logistics issues with moving that much weight/volume without getting caught.

> Someone can get power at the Fed and decide to double the money supply over night.

I think that if the function of government breaks down to this extent, I will have bigger problems than currency devaluation.
A private equity fund owns part of the Lightning. Who owns the fund?
Financialization is, in turn, just a product of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall (in industry). The flight to less-and-less real assets is driven by the effort to avoid having to face up to that fact of economics. This should also get you thinking about the function of cryptocurrencies, NFTs, and the metaverse.
The same culture that embraces this is the same culture that will take risks to start a new electric automobile company. It's give and take. If the workers at the factory are hourly they're also being paid overtime to do this work. My parents worked at Honda in Ohio and often worked more than 40 hours/week because they would get paid overtime. Safety incidents happen because that's just life, but most issues are attributable to drugs/alcohol, and people being scumbags.

Instead of banning something, I think we need to make sure we're allowing people to seek employment options that work best for them with sensible safety practices of course. Being able to work overtime, for example, afforded my parents a great life and a reasonable "retirement" age. You might say, well they could get paid more and join a union, etc. and while I don't care too much about unions one way or another, Honda employees routinely reject unionization because they're really happy with their employment arrangement. I bet Tesla is similar.

Speaking for Honda, many people go straight from high school to work on the factory floor. They work overtime, and they have to do a good job, but if you go and ask the employees or the town of Marysville everyone is pretty happy with the arrangement. Again, I'm not sure why Tesla would be dissimilar except that it's popular so it makes the headlines.

In the case of office workers, software engineers, or others who are salaried, well they're professionals and they're paid a lot of money.

The first reaction to seeing something like "xyz is happening at Tesla" shouldn't be to ban something that you don't understand.
I'm not sure if it's a joke or if he's for real... It's basically replacing google with "serach engine" where every place is bought.

Coming from SEO world this looks like a joke.
It is possible to derive Applicative.

The next release of GHC is able to derive Applicative for product types: `deriving Applicative via Generically1 F`.

If you have a sum type you can derive Applicative as well, but as you mention there are often multiple options so this requires user assistance: `deriving Applicative via Idiomatically F '[LeftBias Id]`.

Here is the library that allows that: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/idiomatic
I LOVE remote working. It allows me to manage scheduling issues at home (like deliveries and sick children), and stops me from the endless distractions of office chatter.

...and the upsides cloud my judgement as to whether it's a net positive from the company's perspective.

While all the good I've seen for myself, it's also been a nightmare for managing the small group of people I have. I had to terminate TWO people because we discovered they were also working a 2nd job, and multiple people have had trouble focusing on work while at home.

Some people did great - others didn't. ...and there's no question that the company culture overall has suffered. I'm not saying I'm definitely for or against it - but I wish people would stop taking absolutist positions on this debate.
Are non-PE’s treated as first class citizens? Also is there room for developers to grow in an engineering firm. It sounds interesting in a concrete way (pun intended), but it seems similar to working for a research university in that you are viewed as more of a laborer as mentioned in a recent post
Well the other browser's design doc is not anywhere near this detailed, but if you want to compare and contrast the overall design here is Chromium's PartitionAlloc.

https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/base...
Why aren’t we working 3 day weeks when we have all this automation power today? Like all things in life the bar just gets raised
I think part of the discussion here is the important distinction between liking something and it having a significant impact on one's life.

I like Star Trek: Strange New Worlds. The impact on my life if I suddenly couldn't watch it would be minimal. I'd have to find some other source of entertainment for an hour a week.

Whether I like Facebook or not, people in my social circles use it for important communication and coordination. Getting cut off from that would be disruptive. I would have to take active steps to insure I continued to hear about upcoming events that are important to me. I would have to convince friends to communicate using something other than Whatsapp or Facebook Messenger (surprisingly hard given it takes under 60 seconds to install and activate Signal).
Thanks for making this, it's super cool! I sometimes don't ask for help because the act of blacking out a screenshot is too onerous, I will bookmark this!!

For anyone navigating this issue who doesn't like to or doesn't have the authority to change what extensions are installed, at least on MacOS, CMD-shift-4 will allow you to select a subsection of the screen to take a screenshot.

Here's a collage I made by opening several preview windows of PDFs I have saved while doing OSINT, then hitting CMD-shift-4:

https://i.imgur.com/5tudrhv.png

I've been saving the screenshots with the intent of usin OpenCV to parse the images into text (with the highlighted portions bolded using markdown or something -- I called the art project "saccades"[A])

Also, if you want to change the default screenshot location:

defaults write com.apple.screencapture location [tk]

(where [TK] is a file path, minus the brackets, I'm fond of redirecting them to a folder in the home directory so you can make use of the tilde goodness inherent in... nix stuff.)

//[A] "From French saccade, 1. (rare) A sudden jerking movement. 2. A rapid jerky movement of the eye (voluntary or involuntary) from one focus to another." https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/saccade#English

/ PS: If anyone knows a better image host than Imgur please let me know, I don't want to just upload it into Wikimedia or whatever, since it's not intended to go adjacent to an article. (I have some animal photos I may upload to Wikimedia under some kind of CC license once I sort them.) */
I love how the article's chart shows Millennial and Boomer, once again erasing the existence Generation X.
Most software engineers can afford $1k/m and still save plenty of money for retirement. The key is not living in a HCOL area and reducing your other spending.
We have a team to manage our Azure k8s. Blue/green clusters, switching traffic between clusters to be able to upgrade k8s, etc

Definitely a lot of work.
Scientists can finally explain why Uranus and Neptune are different colors
If anyone is curious, the submission from 7 years ago got 490 points and 177 comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9645703
I can only ask you to try a bit harder then.

Simply because something contributes to a set of behaviours you disagree with doesn’t mean we should attack.

Sadly, for that very freedom we’ll end up with many more mega conferences about UI ecosystems while the world burns. C’est la vie.

But at least in the meantime we made a lot of money and we succeeded in stopping the kids from smoking the damned pot.
Pick up a second full time remote job.
Gotta get people back to commuting ASAP, otherwise nobody will need Tesla's, right?
On the one hand I _know_ Elon is right (even if I don't like admitting it).

On the other I know that there's a social/societal benefit to keeping remote work normalized and I'm beginning to think it's worth the economic cost.

Edit: I can’t reply because of the stupid rate limit soft-ban. I think there are definitely ICs that are equally (or more) productive at home. I don’t think this is true for the general population, or even the general population of tech workers. From what I’ve seen industries that require above-average collaboration have suffered the most.
How many years later was that? That's a pretty big spread between one partner making $35k and the other $465k
It's really annoying - you have to dig around, and many business do not have a web presence at all so unless you can find something local with ads, you find nothing.

Some tricks I've used in the past include local church bulletins (most parishes have some sort of a website and a weekly bulletin with advertising on the back), or local sport team sponsors, or local bars.

For towing, you can also try calling a local dealership or auto repair.
I spend my whole paycheck, I don’t live paycheck to paycheck, which is a huge difference. I don’t have a money management issue but it is interesting how quickly it can go. And then in California marginal tax rate goes over 50% so headline earnings is not take home.
I started playing with FPGA's while in uni (on my own) when I found out NI's Multisim had the option to export your logic circuits as vhdl. So I used my student email to get a copy of Multisim and get a discount on a Digilent Nexus 2. I was drawing logic circuits and then running them on my board. I was having a lot of fun with it but focus shifted and haven't touched FPGA's since.
Trained on Olivia Frischer , apparently.
And of course the asymmetry between being the CEO of the company, where you sit only in the meetings of your choice and where everyone tries to make you happy vs. having to sit in meetings any manager in your chain scheduled and expects you to make him/her happy.

In general, there is a huge difference between working many hours when you can decide on a whim what to work on vs. having to work many hours on something you have been put on. When working on things I decide to work on, I often have put in enormous amounts of hours, but that cannot be compared with the typical paid work. (I am quite lucky to have a job with relative freedom, but the more I notice it, when there are projects which limit this freedom)
It could be that some (maybe the majority) of these people are asset-rich but cashflow poor. They are not necessarily leaving beyond their means, their net worth may be millions. But the net worth is locked in the value of their home, which is not a liquid asset. They have to pay their mortgage, and high food and gas prices make the day-to-day cashflow calculus a bit complex, but that doesn't mean they are anywhere close to being broke.
Human thought is the universe thinking. Life, inclusive of humanity, is contiguous with deterministic physical reality.
Whatever you do, whichever ML model you develop, a query-independent ordering of all documents will always be necessary since all distributed IR systems will over-retrieve according to some form of term matching and then apply sophisticated scoring to extract the best documents. You can't score trillions of docs for every query.

Google still uses PageRank, but at the risk of stating the obvious, the current PageRank is much more sophisticated than the one found in the bibliography.
Going full "Hughes"? Exactly which policy has Musk put abnormally large influence on?

Maybe the <$1MM lobbying tesla does? (compared to the ~$15MM amazon does in an arguably much less regulated space)

The only thing I see with Musk becoming the richest man alive doing is putting a target on his back for unjustified attacks. He is the better of the billionaires and the world would have progressed technologically many decades farther if all billionaires behaved as he does. Not that I would claim that is "better" for humanity (as that is a very hard metric to define), but I don't think it's hard to imagine that being more optimal.
Minimum 40hr work week.
If you're paying down a $1.7 million mortgage like mentioned in the article, it may feel like you have nothing left at the end of the month, but a lot of that money goes into an asset that is almost guaranteed to appreciate over the 30-year period.

So clearly these home-owning Americans making $250k/year are not actually living paycheck-to-paycheck in the usual meaning, since they're going to be multimillionaires in a few decades. Maybe the main problem here is that too much of their net worth is tied into a single asset.
Is your company hiring remote software engineers? I just started looking and would like to apply if so. My email is in my profile. Thanks.
What's a typical ratio of total salary to market cap? I don't have a reference of if 2x is good or not.
Well if Apple didn't contribute to Clang, it would have C++ 20 because it would be developed by all those developers that aren't Apple. How can Apple be responsible for its deficiencies and not its development?
Yes. BitWarden.
He is not exactly wrong... email could be a bit better phrased and mandating X hrs may be a bit extreme. Overall though his main point about a great product not being built over the phone IMO is correct. At the very least you stand a substantially smaller chance of doing so...
Agree with the randomizing of word length.

How about also having a choice in obfuscation mode?

* Government Mode - Solid black bars so it looks like everything has been redacted.
* UX Placeholder Mode - Lighter bars that are a blend of the font color and background color
* Lipsum Mode - Replace text with a libsum generator that will truncate to similar size text.
Basically, "why technological innovation creates and transforms jobs, instead of causing unemployment".
Of course, it's here:

Build people; not software

Build context; not documents

Build value; not lines of code

Fix root causes; not symptoms
It's been pretty wild watching Elon set his reputation on fire over the past 6~10 years. He certainly had his detractors before then, but it's hard to find a single person standing up for him today. Too much money genuinely is an illness.
> under $18/hour.

Citation? AFAIK All employees get stock and the ESPP lets them also buy at the lowest price per quarter, which given the volatility is a huge boon.
The implication is that until Tesla workers unionize, they’re left to either tolerate these labor actions or find better quality of life with other employers.

Super disappointed in the human he’s turned out to be.
> oligarchs

Can Musk be considered such, considering his antagonistic relationship with current establishment? His acquisition of Twitter could be seen as his first move into politics realm.
That just sounds like someone saying something they know workers want to hear, but having little substance behind it.

Invariably, all relationships need to "earn" the terms of their existence with the other party.
(Most) managers hate meetings just as much as you, and they're not wasting money for the fun of it. Every technical manager has inherited problems because someone at some point tried to save money by hiring a random dude on the cheap who just half assed it.

You go with companies that can demonstrate scalability because they provide project governance, proper change management, and layers of redundancy and support in the event of an emergency.
> I started working for a tech company immediately out of high school.

> What should I do?

Go to college, full-time, while you are still young. As you get older, it will be increasingly difficult to have a tech career without a degree.

You are in a place in your life where you're still on the same wavelength as the typical college student. Also, now that you have career experience, college will be significantly easier than someone who went because it's "what you do after high school." If you go back to college when you're in your late 20s, or older, you may find that spending your days with people a decade younger is frustrating.

Hopefully you don't have a large car payment or mortgage, so it's easy to enter college without strings. Thankfully, you can probably sell anything you bought on credit for more than you owe.

Edit: One thing to add. There is clearly an education bubble and many people young people are spending far too much money on an education that will never pay for itself. You are not one of those people; you've clearly proven that you will benefit immensely from a degree; and that you will have no problem paying back any loans you take out. If you want to keep your costs reasonable, favor looking at good public schools, like UMass Amherst.
Got an example to share?
Make investing a bill. That's the easiest way to do it.