skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It’s not clear if he move the registration to Cloudflare, or just the name server.

There’s a case for not having your registrar also host your DNS records.
The old 'dsh' (distributed shell) command in DEC Ultrix gave you the ability to do something similar from the shell - kind of rsh on steroids. (FWIW, Ultrix remains my overall favorite Unix - it was very well thought-out, and just thought-about period. It's a shame they abandoned it for OSF/1 on Alpha, which never really worked (well, the DEC Alpha hardware worked, but OSF/1 and the compilers never did...)

Way back in the early 90s, inspired by this and a few other things, a coworker of mine (one of only three true geniuses I've ever met) came up with an even more powerful way (called vArray) to spread processes across any arbitrary number of POSIX machines. One of the things vArray could do was make remote memory look local (if painfully slow). He was the company's Cray expert, and developed it for the major oil company we worked for to run jobs too large to fit into the Cray's memory. Since some seismic deconvolution vectorizes very well, with fairly infrequent memory access, it worked better than you might expect, even over the slow networks of the day. Obviously, it hammered the network, but it was quite a sight to see every Sun, DEC, IBM, and HP Unix machine on the company's network light up at once, all coordinating to process jobs that were probably bigger than anything run outside the Black world of the Spooks... Fun days.
There are 239 Wikipedia articles about Barack Obama, but only one Wikidata concept.

Comes in handy when updating the interwiki language links, or being able to automatically fill out those infoboxes.
Stream Deck lets you run a GET request from the default button set. The code part is pretty uninteresting, really: express handler wrapped around the Slack Web API. Throw in some query vars so I can set the emoji, text, and set the minutes after which it will clear (or 0 for never clear).

https://gist.github.com/codyogden/a8d4d024cdd403e56e2c84335a...
Wow, those are all amazing questions.

We are going to structure the investment so that your returns will be post tax-equity and post-depreciation. We would be opening up a can of worms if each retail investor's return were dependent on their particular tax situation (although we are now working with accredited investors who are availing themselves of MACERS and ITC).

We could never guarantee any amount of generation since this is an equity investment, but to generate 1K worth of power on a facility that returned 7.25% would require about a 14K investment. Of course, if you really wanted to get technical, you would also incorporate the dirtiness of the grid you were selling to into your equation. I hope to one day build those types of tools, too.

For sure, if you can build rooftop solar or use some sort of community solar arrangement, you should do that first before considering Legends Solar - it will likely have a strong financial benefit. But you can only offset as much as you consume using those tools, so if you still have an appetite or would like to offset your non-utility consumption, you might still consider us.

For people who live in the city or who rent and don't have access to those tools, or people who like a good product and just want to understand what they actually own through their investment, you might consider us sooner.

Sorry I can't answer with more detail - I really love quantifying and contextualizing the carbon you'll offset and financial returns you can earn in detail, but I'll need to break out my spreadsheets to really get into it.
And when you are done reading it, throw it in the trash. Like everything from cloudflare.
Was anything really lost?

You have a few engineers with hurt feelings and Apple lost the potential for some contributors to fix issues (at the expense of security by obscurity).

Did the world really need another open source OS?
laser baarcode scanners are surprisingly expensive.
No, because the investors can individually choose to decline the deal and get their money back with interest.

Any investors remaining after the deal closes implicitly agreed to the closing price.

I don't think there were any cases of a SPAC not returning deposit money if someone asked, and the institutional investors generally preferred the "guaranteed return" over gambling so the redemption percentage was quite high(I think 50%+).
They're both toys. Load them up with educational apps for the kid. For productivity and entertainment (and if your kid were older, teaching them to type and code), a convertible Chromebook is superior to both devices.
Another clear example of how finance can be used to suck capital out of the public markets. Hey, we all need to take profits eventually, right?
Having a proper terminal was the main reason I bought a macbook pro back in 2007.
Hey if they just came up with the question and struggled at the answer, that's half the battle. It's not all just solving open problems, it's also opening new problems. There was a sociology paper that found 100% of great scientists it reviewed said questions were more important than answers.

(Then the paper went on to make some other point with a more impressive higher margin of error, p-hacking upward, 0% error was too low.)
My last job was working at a company where you could not bring up the app locally. It didn't start that way. When the company was smaller I could develop a whole feature from the backend to the frontend and see the whole flow. As we grew it became increasingly difficult to run the app locally. Then it became impossible. Bugs grew and development time increased honstly 4x to do the same feature I could have done 3 years ago. I now think a good clean developer experience is key to a stable app.
I remember all throughout school having constant stomach ache, which was anxiety but the doctors misdiagnosed it as IBS.

It wasn’t until uni that I realised what was going on.

How did you cope with it?
I think multicore CPUs did a lot to kill the momentum of OpenMOSIX. I remember playing around with clusterKNOPPIX back in the day and being quite impressed by it, but it seems that multiple cores and threads per core became the norm and the cores themselves got a lot faster.

On the other hand, combining multiple 64-core Threadrippers into a single-system-image cluster has a certain appeal to it.
I get very little smoke. I don't roast in my oven anymore but it was never an issue and it's generally recommended as a first attempt.
How so? I’m already contributing with an account that is astoundingly easy to resolve to my real name. Adding government issued ID to that equation would change nothing for me.

I guess it might be problematic if you want to contribute to politically controversial stuff.
I find a lattice of functions from a predicate to another predicate to be about as simple as possible for describing the problem space. I’ve still got a lot to learn, but given that state is a reality for the computing automata we can actually build I like an abstraction that captures it directly.

I have found this to be an interesting exchange of ideas and I appreciate your taking the time to answer my queries. Thanks!
Recent accounting and liability rule changes have made banks more jointly liable and responsible for due diligence of scams, I mean, SPACs. Admittedly, not every SPAC has been an outright scam, but it appears the majority of them turn out to be so with their very optimistic forward projections and statements. Of course, these changes occur after billions upon billions of dollars have been poured into these companies. It doesn't help that the PCAOB and SEC don't have much in the way of fines that they can issue, historically and recently speaking. The supreme court being inclined to challenge or basically to legislate against the authority of federal agencies to do anything not explicitly spelled out by the constitution when it suits the philosophies of the supreme court justices.

In addition to a partisan supreme court and SEC and PCAOB being unable or unwilling to curb market excesses, many of my peers in accounting have done time at accounting firms and the SEC. These same firms are paid by the very same companies where these people end up working that the SEC oversees. I wonder where the conflict of interest is in this revolving door policy.
This mirrors my strategy personally and professionally. I’ve dealt with CF Trust and Safety before, and they are hands down the most opaque organization I’ve ever dealt with. It’s almost like they take pleasure in being withholding, far beyond anything I’ve ever seen from a “trust and safety” team anywhere else.
I appreciate that he's drawing clear lines (aside from the generically "severe" consequences promised in response to Russia using nukes, which seems like sensible strategic ambiguity). Have to wonder what the game plan is if Russia does indeed use nuclear weapons. All options seems terrible.
> For years, companies profitably sold products with full schematics - even your appliances would come with them.

We should really go back to that. I still have the schematic of my Sony CRT lying in some drawer.
I'm actually very glad this is the case.
I would like to take a moment to point out how beautiful the gold inlay on the design is. That would have been very difficult to do at the time.
Whitewater paddles are a fundamentally different beast than flat water paddles. You’re not just using them to move forward, you’re using them to manipulate the boat in all three dimensions. So rigidity is key and leverage is key. Your paddle stroke in whitewater is basically straight up and down and intended for maximal power in multiple directions, not long-term energy efficiency as it is in touring.
I've read the first two chapters so far and found it to be interesting and accessible. The style is pleasantly warm compared to a lot of modern writing while maintaining scientific integrity and treating the reader more maturely than average contemporary pop-sci.
I blame how writing is taught in school for this, it's a combination of trying to make ourselves look smarter and also fluff up the word count I think. We are taught meta-writing rather than writing to actually communicate an idea effectively
I wrote XModem on a Pet-2001 in BASIC. It worked fine at 300 Baud.

At the time you wanted simple and small code.
They "went down" at the correct and absolute best time to cash out before interest rates rise and these companies go belly up. It's about grift not about making the company work well.
This isn't a toaster or anything.

A few decades ago nearly all but the most complicated devices could have their entire schematic printed in the last few pages of the owner's manual.

Today... a typical PC mainboard schematic might be hundreds or thousands of pages dealing with all sorts of complications for RF and stuff.

What would 99.999% of people do with such a schematic?
These housing, anti-car articles posted to HN have a such an emotional and dramatic feel. I'm not saying there isn't any truth to it. But it feels the same as American political propaganda. There's a distinct over-dramatic shrieking to it.
As a message I prefer 'not in word list' rather than 'invalid'

As it's very unlikely you have every word in your list.
> they were being developed by FTPing files to production server or even editing them live with vim or something.

Many editors / IDEs (e.g. Notepad++) can directly connect to the FTP server, so working on a FTP servers looks almost same as working on a local folder. You just make changes to the files, and then refresh the web browser to see the changes.
SambaXP Conference starts tomorrow. Virtual and free to attend
Thank you for reading my post at face value, This was not about the 'Melbourne people suck' angle (as clearly Melbourne people do not suck), but the topic of government handling.
Why do you think they're delusional? If there is a significant portion of their users that will not pay for their service, what is the upside of letting them watch your content for free?
You're working very hard. Now and then, you grab a free soda. You work so hard that the corporation has a chance to grow. What is your reward for all that hard work? The chance to pay 50c for the previously free soda. From this point of view, there is nothing rational about it.
> Job offers will not even mention total number of shares outstanding.

Wait, mine told me. You may have to ask. I think it's okay to ask questions about it, if they're offering it as part of the pitch to get you to join.
Starts at 6am Pacific, 9am Eastern, 3pm Central European time. Virtual, and free to attend with registration.

Come learn about the future of the SMB 2 & 3+ protocols, the most widely used storage protocols worldwide, from the desktop and in the Cloud !

Speakers are from:

Catalyst.
DDN.
Google.
Microsoft.
Red Hat.
Sernet.
SUSE.
Turkish Municipality Saves $1M by Migrating to Pardus Linux
When I was in grade 4, our teacher "paid" us every day in monopoly money. Everything had a cost - going to the washroom during class, sharpening a pencil, etc. And there were fines for being late with your school work, or being disruptive, etc. This went on for the entire school year.

It seemed to work at least a little, because people got really stressed out when they were running out of money. This was mainly to teach how money works, but it probably had bonus behavioral side effects to boot.
> Windows laptops at that time had horrible command line experience and did not play well with Unix/Linux which is what most web servers were running on.

In 2006, the main reason for Linux was to fix things Microsoft broke, which upon discovery Microsoft would break again, and Linux devs would again restore functionality to Windows networks. So your first point here is somewhat true, Microsoft did not play well with Linux which was moderately successful at playing well with Microsoft.

In 2006, however, most webservers did not run Linux, hardly any did, in fact. Linux took over the data center about 5 years later. In 2006, most webservers were either IIS on Windows Server or, believe it or not, NetBSD. In fact, the vast majority of webservers globally, like 90% or more, ran NetBSD w/ Apache, and if not for fanaticism, this would still be true today, because there was and is absolutely nothing wrong with NetBSD that Linux fixes.
In the recent thread about arbitration, an attorney said something to the effect of: you cannot possibly hope to keep up with a corporation's army of lawyers, actuaries, and even psychologists writing those agreements.

You may not have even originally agreed to said terms, and they were shoved at you in an update which you "can opt out of" by discontinuing your service.
Why not just require it for all public packages?
I've done things like this in ad-hoc setups with Docker Compose and environment variables, managed with shell scripts. I would be very interested in a more thoughtful alternative that was integrated with testing.
Mine does not

~ $ cal apr

cal: year `apr' not in range 1..9999
Ironic, because it's gotten easier than ever to include such big files, either on a USB drive or preloaded onto the SSD.
It's interesting -- I only play Wordle on hard mode, so these "restrictions" seem perfectly good and fine to me. I guess if you're not used to it they seem onerous.

Though I guess to be fair Wordle doesn't force hard mode, so it seems this version shouldn't either.
While I don't want to fully defend Cloudflare's customer-hostile practices here, it's worth noting that the text you quote is only for if a domain expires:

> In the event that Registrant fails to renew the domain name in a timely fashion, the registration will expire and Cloudflare may, at its discretion, elect to assume the registration and may hold it in its own account, delete it, or sell it to a third party.

I mention this because without that context it looks even worse.
I've been looking for a lightweight CSV reader for some time now. Thanks for making this.
I don't remember the wording. But something that there had been discussions and it should not be difficult / much work.
This is often not as impressive as it seems.

I was paying extra for green energy from my local power utility (ENMAX) and it turns out, by green they meant they were burning biomass and using some form of carbon offset for it at the time I was paying. (https://www.enmax.com/home/electricity-and-natural-gas/easym...)

That's greenwashing and I won't have any of it.

I am getting panels put in this year; for some people that isn't an option.
Here's a YouTube of the airplane pick up technique described:
https://youtu.be/p4fvCcqtumo?t=64

"He would then set up the poles, string the line between them, and attach the harness. The C-47 would then come in low and slow, trailing a grappling hook. The hook would snag the line, lifting the harnessed operative off the ground and into the air behind the airplane, where he’d be winched on board."

And here's a written description with some photos. The photos include one of a C-47 about to do a pick up: https://www.ww2gp.org/gliderpickup/
It's interesting that a fair number of people have apparently been driven to cancel by this really quite modest price increase. I would guess it's not the extra money but rather the change prompting people to (re)evaluate the overall value of the sub. That, and/or resentment over being asked to start paying for something that people have come to feel entitled to get for free, however unreasonably - maybe there's anger stemming from a perception of this as a "punish the poor" policy
I have a personal opinion that might not be popular

Wikipedia is actual encyclopedia and useful

Wikidata is a weird idea to create a weird “semantic web” - a hierarchy of everything that ever existed or will exist - and it’s about as useful and easy to understand as previous experiments with semantic web.

Wikimedia seems to double down on this instead of letting it die; I really don’t understand the point, I don’t think that it’s useful and it’s really hard to edit, as a editor.

Interesting thing is - it’s CC0 instead of creative commons for some reason. Their argument is that you cannot copyright a fact. I donno.
has haskell made all this pluggable?
Did you ever consider contacting the people responsible for the selection and making a request? They were probably just going by their best guess.
Slightly off topic, but is it just me or do words have a completely different effect on you based on where you are and what you feel in life?

As a slightly lost teenager, it was oddly calming to know there was literature out there that wasn't so bland, and writers out there with a unique style of writing.

What I talk about when I talk about running - Haruki Murakami
I hate your suggestion. "Defaults" inevitably seem to get used to push some thing I don't want - for example "open in google docs". I don't want another click added so I have to navigate away from whatever cloud storage is being shilled by my browser.

I think the answer is that some of the browsers actually care about how their users use them and don't want to add extra clicks.

That said, being able to specify a default location seems fine. I thought I could already do this in firefox, so of you want to, just setup the default so it saves to your cloud provider
not wikipedia; but wikimedia commons. A bit of a difference.
what was the OCR algorithm in this?
Omg. I just realized SPACs are like the plot of The Producers.
> can't see who's been swimming naked.

*can
That’s a different problem though. In the original problem you don’t know the two amounts ahead of time. All you see is $50 in your envelope - you don’t know if the other one is $100 or $25 and you’re back to square one.
This reminds me of the negative experience I had with Cloudflare in the past, the thing that really bothered me about it was that though their system had made actions on my account their own audit log attributed those actions to me.

So I'm still left wondering, was that intentional or a bug?
I have the resources to simply hire a bunch of people to do stuff, but it turns out the best people aren't going to drop on a dime and build your product for you before you have validation, knowledge, a story, and cogent plan.

We are 5 months old (though I was working on this solo for more than a year before that), and in that time I've built the team that will build this product.
Ugh, I just switched things over to Cloudflare a little while ago. But if this ever happened to me it would destroy my digital life, because like the OP all of my emails go through my custom domain. Time to look into Namecheap I guess.
My hackles would always raise when the company started buying the cheapest coffee available for the break room. Usually meant a buyout was coming.
I don’t know a thing about draft animals if that’s what you mean. I know some Amish communities still use them for tilling and plowing though, so it can certainly be made to work. They have the advantage of huge families though, so there is no labor shortage like there is for more secular farmers.
Exactly. Underdog companies always try and differentiate themselves with standards and openness and talk about how friendly they are compared to the big giants, and then close themselves off once they become #1. I have personally seen this happen so many times. And it's happening right now with AMD as they're slowly overtaking Intel. And expect to see Intel scramble soon about how they're all geeks at heart and love open-source and standards.
Watching a regulation do what it was meant to do in real time.
Pandora can be maddening.

Create a station for Pixies. Some Bowie song plays. Ok that’s cool.

Create a station for Velvet Underground. Same Bowie song plays. Ok. I guess that makes sense.

Create a station for Warren Zevon. Same goddamned Bowie song plays!
Why wouldn’t training small recurrent networks with GA scale? Genetics algorithms are embarrassingly parallel, even more so than training neural networks by gradient descent. It’s not efficient sure but it’s trivially scalable.
Maybe more than a couple decades ago? I haven't seen a computer that included schematics since my dad's Tandy 3000 from the mid-80s. And even in the 80s the TVs and VCRs we had were covered in "don't try to repair this yourself" warnings and I really doubt included schematics.
You're assuming it's their choice. It's much more likely that they don't own all the IP and can't get the relevant rightsholder(s) to agree to make things public. Notice that they say "we were able to share" and mention "work[ing] through constraints" when talking about sharing more detailed schematics.

I imagine they can't say this explicitly because the terms of their business relationships are themselves confidential and they don't want to say anything that could jeopardize those relationships.