skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I did SAML with Barclays years ago. The hardest part was getting someone there to click enable for our app. They’d never reply to my emails so I called them until they picked up. Then it was done in 30 minutes.
> Apoploe vesrreaitais" Could refer to something along the lines of a "fan / wedge"

"feathered" maybe?
How to Defeat the Billionaire Class
Accounting/PeopleOps meets the Real World! Great anecdote.

The free meals are a perk paid for by the people creating the revenue. I suspect that perk probably wasn't budgeted for addition to the Contractor work. An oversight, perhaps? Hopefully folks working got fed.
> For example, my emacs config is a literate org file, which is important to me. It is large and complicated and I don’t feel like it’s a good fit for an “all my configs together” solution.

I have a literate config that works with home-manager.

The problem is the 800 noweb-ref blocks took 10+ seconds to tangle.

I reported it, and someone optimized tangling to 0.5 seconds. I'm still using the custom patches though since the changes haven't been released or maybe even merged yet.
It's abuse and theft, plain and simple. Replace "domain" with literally any physical object. You can't just take someone else's shit, no matter how high-and-mighty you think you are (excepting governments, of course).
The Pope’s Back Channel to Hitler
Wow, I’ve never heard this bullshit before.
Like Apple, Intel Reiterates Plans to Merge CPU, GPU High-Performance Chip
Reduct Storage Behind Nginx
>It seems you are the one who is confused. The America you are describing does not exist. The idea you have, that people can stay as long as they don't oppose what "hitovst thinks is best" is pretty arrogant.

Let's not misconstrue what I am saying. Considering that everyone who has influence in the political structure of the US, has the right and duty to use the system to protect the rights of the individual. This is accurate, and true. The fact that we don't have this is due to corruption, confused useful idiots, and criminals who betray their oaths.

There is no such "right" as the right to violate another.

The US is not a democracy, or tyranny of the largest group which is almost never a majority, for a reason. It is a Constitutionally restricted republic with the sole purpose of protecting the rights of the individual. The Constitution doesn't grant rights, but restrict government from violating them. There is no such thing as legitimate government anywhere that violates the right of the individual, but in the US the Law is officially recognized.

Do not let our lawless (by that I mean, "criminal" as the law of the land is very clear, just violated) society fool you. The United States is occupied and sabotaged. If Americans ever regained control, the saboteurs would be brought to justice, and removed. This won't happen.. but it should happen, and it was the design.

>Like I said, the America you imagine does not exist.

It's not my imagination. If you study the design, you will see what was meant to be. Had the intention been for tyranny of the largest group, or even another individual, it would have been designed as a democracy, or a monarchy, or any other system that already enabled such things.

However, we don't disagree about the criminal state of the US today, and the lack of justice for those who corrupt it. The fact that slavers/slaves won't allow a single lawful political region to exist anywhere one Earth should beg the question if it should exist, especially since the slavers have the useful idiot slaves paying lip service to the notion of "tolerance", and "pro choice", when it serves the herding. If only they understood, and believed, some of their claims.
The problem is that everything has gone to SaaS application. Salesforce is not any better than goldmine is. It is just better marketing spin. We need to get back to thick apps, and use decentralized methods of collaboration.
Why aren't they doing this on mobile?
The story I heard was that at least in one case the driver was told that "reasonable and prudent" was not what you thought it was, but what Mom and Pop at the ice cream shop thought it was, because they're the ones that would sit on your jury should it ultimately go that far. :-)
If you want the “classic coffee” taste, find a blend or single origin with Brazilian beans.
Well that's what I was thinking of, to put this plain text calendar on an e-ink screen with RPi. A google cal or ical integration out of the box.

I guess I can roll my own OAuth and parser, but then I'm not going to use this linked plain text calendar.
Uh oh.

I saw Sears stores start to have broken signs about 3 years before they went bust.
It helps if you can practically enforce the restriction. Easy enough to tell if someone's driving a private car when the streets are otherwise mostly empty; hard to monitor everyone's speed and reliably pull people over if they go past the limit.
These capabilities are increasingly required just to get in the door, depending on your target customer.

The alternative is that your product becomes a security exception, which infosec teams are more and more unwilling to grant, for pretty good reasons.

The good news for product teams is that there are more and more off-the-shelf options that can be quickly integrated vs. having to start from scratch.

But the main point of this comment is: I think you’re right that “near term roadmap” was good enough a few years ago, but less so now, and continuing to trend towards “not acceptable” if selling to enterprise customers.

(Observations as a recent/former auth PM at a SaaS/PaaS that sold primarily to enterprise customers).
If you are using Julia I would recommend looking at AMDGPU.jl and (pluging my own project here) KernelAbstractions.jl
When someone impacts morale, forcing a team to work with that person is highly damaging.

The managers all knew who these people were, so they could have given them severance without calling it a layoff. I'm mostly referring to a situation where everyone else would have been relieved instead of spooked.
I’m not concerned with my riding style, I’m concerned with people driving around me.

So many bad drivers are on the road that my vehicle purchases are guided by safety over other factors.
Fundamentally large-scale monocultures are inefficient because they require large scale external inputs. When the overall cost of these inputs (transportation, source-site damage, energy inputs, requisite equipment, etc.) are considered in aggregate, the approach does not make sense economically. Obviously, it is also unsustainable.

I believe a sustainable, long-term agriculture would include in its design the following features: multi-crop/intercrop by design (ecosystem vs. monoculture), reduction of emphasis on uniformity, iterative rather than total harvesting.

Perhaps the main issue with such an approach is currently harvesting technology. Densely interplanted crops may be hard to access and thus hard to harvest. And yet, because they should tend to require less external inputs, be more resistant to pathogens, and provide healthier soils, improved water retention, reduced wind exposure, and multiple crops on the same land, there should be a budget for this.
Or, if you prefer, it's one piece of evidence that is easy to measure.
Mid-career would be associate professor or equivalent in non-teaching institution, where you begin to establish your own group, and have your own doctoral fellows.

A postdoc/research associate would be early career researcher, where you still are a member of a research group, but might have bachelor's and master's students under your supervision.
Both might be considered morally wrong, but only one seems illegal.
Maybe, but UK universities don't have much headroom. They can't raise their student fees past the government set level; the government funding per student has decreased; only the oldest institutions have massive endowments; and they don't spend crazy amounts on sport, admin or pampering students.

Some of them can try to squeeze their student base a bit more (increase accommodation prices, reduce subsidies in the food halls, etc) but the students don't have access to private loans so they can't afford much.
How to Make the Universe Think for Us
I'm a bit unsure about "the industry" here. It's probably true that whitewater paddlers, as the article suggests, tend to go with shorter paddles than are generally ideal for sea kayak touring. Generally speaking, longer shaft paddles have been available, but it may well be the case that a lot of people don't go with them because it doesn't feel natural based on how they learned to paddle.

(I agree with the basic point that, for sea kayaking, you mostly want to keep your hands fairly low and have a relatively long paddle. There's also a whole discussion around blade shapes but that's a topic for another day.)

ADDED: I did do a fair amount of sea kayaking instruction at one point and the inclination of a lot of students is definitely to hold their hands high and dig in whether because of previous whitewater kayaking, canoeing, fun-yaks, or other reasons.
They don’t teach cursive anymore.
> offboarding

Brilliant! I didn't think of that, making sure all credentials are revoked and ownership of resources is set to someone else.
> they squandered at least one significant aspect of the language design due to (in my opinion) a lack of knowledge in the relevant area.

Why do you believe the reason was lack of knowledge?
It did require a lot of effort for Element, Element is a competitor to Zulip, and I found the UX around E2EE of Element to be perfectly acceptable and consistent with UX of the previous versions, so your comment was also a bit disingenuous IMO.

It is obvious that E2EE would involve a big rework of the codebase, but it is neither impossible nor unnecessary. If there are architectural problems with it, I have to question the original developer intent, as a lot of stuff that E2EE requires to work also improve privacy in general.
One of HN's guidelines is "charitable assumption". It specifically is required toward other posters. But you might extend that charity to Go's creators.

They actually were experts at the top of their field. Assuming a lack of knowledge is both uncharitable and, frankly, arrogant. It would be better to assume that they made choices other than the ones you would have made, and did so with eyes wide open and full knowledge.
Sounds like you believe "common sense" is common, but it is often not. A lot of "truisms" need better publicity.

A pertinent example. Every single job thread here has dozens of folks complaining that no interviewing company has a lick of interest in training. It causes untold harm to everyone involved. It certainly has negatively affected me.
An incredibly-wide industry thinking that folks are unable to learn; it boggles the mind.
These kind of NDAs are frustrating because it prevents systemic problems from being aired and addressed. I don't blame you for accepting it – I would have done the same – because it's not your problem to fix; you just want your $1000 back, but I wish they would be restricted by law.
And good luck selling enterprise software to Apple, Google and Facebook, they all already have some custom internal softwares for everything
I have a cheap VPS, host my own email, host my own websites, never had any of the problems you are describing.
The person you are responding to is right actually. I drew in an ASCII art a diagram of the various game trees so it will be easier for you to see this:

On Wikipedia they created two trees one with 2A.

-> Keep -> 2A
2A -> Switch -> A
0.5 ->
A -> Keep -> A
-> Switch -> 2A

And another with 1/2A

-> Keep -> A
A -> Switch -> A/2
0.5 ->
A/2 -> Keep -> A/2
-> Switch -> A

Notice now that there is no game in which A is both 2A and A/2.

If you don't think this is the error, you're not thinking in imperfect information terms. You're thinking in perfect information terms. This sort of splitting action is allowed in perfect information games! In imperfect information games, you are in multiple subgames at the same time. A has to be the same A in both subgames, because you can't discriminate between which game you are in. So you're not allowed to do this. It is wrong!

This gets at the core of what the question is trying to make people notice. You can't do this with imperfect information. You can only do it with perfect information. You can't do it over information sets and strategy spaces. You can only do it over states and action spaces.

But they do it. And then they combine them back into the same analysis when they say 1/2(Game tree 1 switch case) + 1/2 (Game tree 2 keep case). And you can't do that, because game tree one depends on game tree ones keep case and game tree 2 depends on its switch case! You can't tell which you are in, so you are in both - not one or the other. You can't combine the two different subgames from two different trees like you could in perfect information! You have to stick with the same game tree.

And that is what the person you are mistakenly correcting is saying. Pick one or the other, you can't have both.

PS: There are other errors in the problem, like that when you solve it with an MDP or the Bellman equations you actually /do/ end up with 100% Switch having an expected value of zero. So if you spotted some other error, that doesn't mean that the person you are correcting is wrong in their correction. There are multiple issues with the way the wikipedia article approaches the conclusion.

PPS: This exact confusion that people are talking about is actually something that happened in practice in the solving of imperfect information games! IIRC the Pluribus paper author corrected a reasoning error of this type when he introduced sub game reach solving? I might be misremembering here, since its been a while since I listened to his talk, but my fuzzy memory suggests that confusion about subgames interacting with each other was the root cause of a failure in some of the poker research for subgame solving in a blueprint abstraction.
Prof. from Norway here. While it sounds like the situation in the US and UK is worse than our own, I’m seriously considering moving to industry after 20 years in academia. Mainly fed up by ever growing admin, and stupid financial oversight regulations, and the general workload… and many other things that isn’t wise to complain about publicly.
Like with bicycling, the danger is largely from the cars around you, not the vehicle itself.

Which is not to say your concerns are unfounded. Just means we need safer streets. :)
Cannabinoid Separation Methods in the Public Domain -Everything You Need to Know
We’re kicking off launch week for Lab Overflow with our new blog section. Eric’s written a classic - it’s a must-read for all lab technicians and chemists in the cannabis industry.
I've played around with something similar

(Year)
(dd) (MMDD): (most important event), (next most important)

Ex

2022

sa 0102: appt

su 0103: party, drop off mail

mo 0104: work, call jon
BTW have you tried `KernelAbstractions.jl`? With it you can write code once that will run reasonably fast on AMD or NVIDIA GPUs or even on CPU. One of our engineers just started using it and is pleased with it - apparently the performance is nearly equivalent to native CUDA.jl or AMDGPU.jl, and the code is simpler.
If you can tolerate Qt or SDL on your system, there are a few options: https://linuxphoneapps.org/categories/maps-and-navigation/

Other than that, I think that the planned GTK4 port of GNOME Maps has the potential to improve things a lot.
That used to be in some UNIX variants, such as UCLA Locus and the IBM derivatives of that. But it never got to be a Linux thing.
In boom years, wage earners have work.

In bust years, they're out of a job.

Having the capital to maintain having capital is a gigantic edge over wage earners.
Gifted or not, nothing's wrong about being good at academics. That might be one's only gift. But the academy is not what it once was, and there's a lot of highly-motivated people seeking academic professions (which very often - as I learned from talking to professors - involve a lot more than teaching and research).

Outside of full-time opportunities in that ideal environment then, there are lots of yearners. Surprise, surprise, colleges don't worry much about such people. There's another crop moving in behind them, more grants to apply for. The outide world looks right past specialized outsiders. A lucky few become great writers.
Of course, the "right" answer for racing may not be the same as for someone doing relatively recreational paddling. I assume it's very situational--including for the individual involved.
At the end of the day, it all comes down to ROI. If this had a good ROI, it probably already attracted enough investors without needing to create such a investment product. If not, then I might as well buy SP500.
That's one of the best threads in hn fr
Good point. But even if they (any of those corps running algorithms but no customer support worth the name) comply (which I won't take for granted), you will get some code or keyword that fraudulent activity was detected. Very unlikely that they have technical details of the root cause in their customer DB.
Love my vespa and am always afraid of it getting stolen. His an AirTag on it a month ago just in case.
I'm not sure about your conclusion here. If we don't repeat the letter then we're going to have information about another letter, which we don't want.
One of the best threads
Very worrying. One of the reasons I'd choose a non-huge company like Cloudflare would be I'm less likely to encounter one of these "our automation banned you, we won't tell you why, fuck off" episodes. Looks like more and more companies are cargo-culting this horrible practice.

Waiting for my utility company to turn off my heat: "Your house is fraud. We won't tell you how we know. Fuck off and freeze."
Whew got it with 2 options left...50/50.
ForkCoder? Or ForkEd...
So you're saying $30-$40k for SDE in Spain, the internet seems to say $10k above that, but never mind. My knowledge is from Northern Europe, so I'm basing my math on that.

So in our case, the average SDE salary here is $98k, and let's say your partner is a teacher, so a combined gross salary of $150k/yr for the family with small children, let's say living in the capital (most expensive). Then statistically you have more income than 80% of couples with small children living there, so already you know you're well off.

After tax you're taking home about $8000 per month. We already said you're spending $2600 on your nice house. Let's say you have two kids, one electric car and one petrol car. Then the official reference budget published by the state says you're spending $3400 a month on food, clothing, the cars, public transport, furniture, childcare, most of the necessary expenses. We are missing a couple of things like insurance, utilities etc., which is about $500 a month. So you're left with something like $1000 to $1500 a month for discretionary spending. And you have basically no commute and live in a perfectly safe place with free healthcare.

As for "Europeans try very hard to get jobs in the US" - that is not supported by the data. By a very large margin the people immigrating to the US are from Asia, South America and Africa. The first European country on the list is the UK in 22nd place with 10k people per year. The next is Poland and Germany with about 5k people each, and software devs is obviously just a tiny fraction of that. Meanwhile Germany plus the UK are home to an estimated total of 1.6 million software developers, so the percentage of devs emigrating is obviously extremely, ridiculously small.
Here’s the algorithm of the game’s letter marking system, based on my experience reproducing its logic for a script I wrote that computes remaining words from your guesses and their corresponding marks.

Suppose the target word is “polar” and you guess “banal”.

A submitted word is marked in 3 passes.

0. Initial state: (“banal”, “polar”)

1. Zip together the letters of the guess and target words, and loop through the zipped list. When both letters at a position are the same, replace the guess letter with the symbol for “correct” (green) and remove the target letter from the target word. State: (“banGl”, “polr”)

2. Loop through the target word’s letters, replacing the first occurrence (if any) of each one in the guess word with the symbol for “present” (yellow). State: (“banGY”, “polr”)

3. Replace any remaining letters in the guess word with the symbol for “not present” (black). State: (“BBBGY”, “polr”)

Return the marked guess word.

---

Other examples:

0. (“mamma”, “amaze”)

1. (“mamma”, “amaze”)

2. (“YYmmY”, “amaze”)

3. (“YYBBY”, “amaze”)

---

0. (“nieto”, “otoño”)

1. (“nietG”, “otoñ”)

2. (“nieYG”, “otoñ”)

3. (“BBBYG”, “otoñ”)

edit: fixing formatting issues. Sorry, first time posting a comment on here.
See, I think that's not getting it. Cutting the drinks isn't what cost them the people. It's just what caused the loss of people to be evident. Particularly since the organization had changed, it would have been unwise NOT to bring the perk policy in line with the rest of it.
The Terraform plugin for the Dominos Pizza provider
It’s classic elastic vs inelastic demand. Grocery stores don’t need to worry so much about their brand image. Not zero, but less than a store selling luxuries.
Is that a "but" or is that how things should work? You solve a problem when you have it or can reasonably predict it (in technical/engineering terms). I also think it's sensible to look for experts when you need them right?
While the overloading is annoying, database normalization actually has a strict definition that is not unlike the standard mathematical use; that is, to imply consistency (to make normal): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_normalization

I would also point out that normalization within mathematics does not have a single concrete definition either, and it depends on your domain and desired property to stabilize: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normalization_(statistics)
or a pain provoker for Harry Crane https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suRDUFpsHus
Then we can all build up sets of related things collaboratively.

You could also take all the posts and related links, toss them in a big adjacency matrix and, oh I dunno, rank the relatedness of pages.

Dumb jokes aside, these do add a lot of extra structure to the dataset and people might think up something interesting to do with that.
“… maybe that makes eye contact the very essence of music.”
…tell that to Ray Charles and Stevie Wonder!
Well, the article spells out that it wasn't really about the sodas:

> The engineers focused on building product never noticed when the company had grown into something different than what they first joined.

> The sodas were just the wake-up call.
Congratulations! You have just reinvented the core idea of UCLA's LOCUS distributed computing project from 1979. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LOCUS

Reinventing LOCUS also has a strong heritage. Bell Lab's Plan 9, for example, did so in part in the late 1980s.

While never a breakout commercial success, tele-forking and its slightly more advanced cousins machine-to-machine process migration and cluster-wide process pools intrigued some of the best minds in distributed computing for 20+ years.

Unfortunately "it's complicated" to implement well, especially when you try to tele-spawn and manage resources beyond compute cycles (network connections, files, file handles, ...) that are important to scale up the idea.
If a company isn’t earning enough to cover its expenses, is it really successful if all it does is increase its debt load?

(Seems like a lesser capitalized version of publicly listed companies that make nothing but losses yet have increasing stock prices)