skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
One near constant thing I notice is that hardly anyone (_especially_ scrum certified folk) recognises that scrum, by design, makes it self redundant. Most think scrum is a final-state. A goal line.

It's not. Scrum is a training/introductory agile framework. There is an evolution to scrum built right into the framework that transforms it into not-scrum. The framework encourages moving from the initial (and what most orgs think is the final state of scrum) "Type A" where the team work in isolated timeboxes, with downtime between for planning etc. through "Type B" with preparation(s) for upcoming sprints, and feedback from previous sprints, overlapping the current sprint, to "Type C" with complete "just-in-time process" transformation where doing any given ceremony is done on-demand. And, crucially, it encourages evolving _beyond_ this.

Type C will be familiar to anyone practicing Kanban. Or dare I say, anyone with experience with "doing agile right" will have an experience matching what Type C describes.
>You are heavily underestimating how comparatively hard is to get any kind of gun here

>Sure there is possibility if You have lots of time and money

You seem to be unaware of Polish gun laws. Black powder traditional firearms are virtually unregulated in Poland. A replica black powder revolver is a fully competent self defense revolver. Watch paul harrell or a number of videos about these weapons and you'll understand a Polish person can get a damn good lethal revolver with basically no barriers. It's my understanding you may even be able to conceal carry them completely legally as well, without any license whatsoever.
In every new team, on first retrospective I test it with a simple: let's get rid of retrospectives (followed by: let's not make demos). If it passes the manager, this is a true retro - never happened.
The Russian DeepFaceLab Discord has found that running DFL triggers a warning, since Colab recognizes the code - https://imgur.com/kgztFJe
I expect not. Actual government agencies have trouble with that kind of thing (for taxation/fines/judgment enforcement); random hackers have no chance.
Systemd "moved the cheese" and some people will never stop getting upset about it.
I'm not as familiar with Unpoly so this is based on limited knowledge. I think Unpoly is more based the concept of "frames" that can be changed dynamically, so in some ways it is very similar to HTMX with it's updating fragments. But I'm assuming it is diffing the DOM rather than just replacing it as HTMX does.

Tetra on the other hand is very "component" focused, everything is built up out of nested components. These are rendered on the server and a diff/merge is performed by the Alpine.js Morph plugin to update the dom. So Tetra doesn't re-render the whole page, only the component that changes, therefore it probably sits somewhere between Unpoly and HTMX, but I have done no benchmarking.

Tetra is also tightly linked to Python, each components server state is "frozen" and sent to the browser when it first renders (encrypted and signed). If you then call any public methods on the component the state is sent back to the server and "resumed". This makes the component fully statefull between server public method calls. Neither HTMX or Unpoly have this, you have to manually implement the end points for all updates. Tetra does that all for you.

Compared with HTMX and Unpoly you should be writing less code with Tetra.
This was way less code than I expected it to be. Nice!
Is there an NPM module that serves as a standard library?

My code is a combo of lodash bits, datefns, helper regexes I’ve curated over the years, etc

Is there a standard library-like package that you import on most projects?
Here's my experience with removing systemd from Debian - DO NOT ATTEMPT. There's a reason the Devuan people have made significant changes to the system and packages.

If you don't want systemd it's important to choose a distribution that doesn't increasingly expect it. Don't try to rip it out, that just causes pain to the host (you). You need to treat it by avoiding it.
Fundamentally, it's a mispricing issue. The consoles are too cheap. The manufacturers aren't producing enough to satisfy the quantity demanded at the prices they are charging. This allows scalpers to make money off consumers. They should probably raise their prices while the shortage lasts.
If you do client side hashing then the hash becomes the password, it only helps with password reuse on other services. From your service perspective the security issue doesn't change much.
I agree, the western side is hardly a hellscape. I guess don't let the tourists know!

San Francisco is really 2 different cities rather than 11 counties. West side (where I live) has some minor problems but otherwise offers the best mix of culture, places to eat, parks, and transit. Downtown is rife with problems and if someday it does get cleaned up, it will wonderful since the right density and transit is there.
https://without-systemd.org/wiki/index_php/Arguments_against...
I hate to be smug here, but there are plenty of simple reasons outlined on the very same wiki: https://without-systemd.org/wiki/index_php/Arguments_against...

My personal relationship is a necessary-evil one. Without it, I'd have more problems with concurrency and service/session management, but I'd lose a lot of "systemd messed up resolv/nsswitch/hosts" scenarios.

Also, for most basic set-ups, even server ones, a classic BSD or SysV init works, as do simpler and more lightweight options, as proven by Alpine, FreeBSD and derivatives (FreeNAS, PFsense) and OpenBSD based solutions. And when stuff goes wrong, those are infinitely easier to decipher.

That doesn't mean, however, that systemd is hard to write config for, often when you need a service or script ran at bootup or login it's easier to make it work right than with a SysV-style init script. The problem is the growing config- and codebase, coupled with the binary logging system, which makes it even harder (AND NO, I REFUSE TO LEARN ANOTHER HIGHLY SPECIFIC TOOL TO READ THE BINARY FILES).

Ysall
There shouldn't be ANY mass shootings EVER. In what civilized society are we comfortable with one child being murdered at school let alone 19.
Mayor Run – Let's see how corrupt you are
There is definitely an argument to be made regarding uops that just because the vector width of the interface doubled, the hardware resouces need not have doubled as well. AVX512 originally came from KNL accelerators, which were designed for more specific purposes.
https://www.businessinsider.com/how-a-22-year-old-makes-micr....
I'm not super familiar with systemd or any of the lower level stuff like init systems in general, but I was under the impression that it's just an umbrella for many individual modules/binaries, like journald, etc, and not actually monolithic.

I get the argument against hard dependencies, which the individual modules seem to be dependent on each other, but is that really that abnormal with Linux programs? I more understand the criticism against higher level programs, like GNOME, having hard dependency on systemd specifically.

With all that said, I'm not doubting there's valid criticism as I'm sure that I'm missing for fundamental points of the "monolithic" argument as it relates to systemd. The above is just my sort-of layman impression.
You can get multiple seasons of this clip show by putting 'author:tptacek applied cryptography' in the search box. A recent episode:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28923954
> I don't think the other 22 states would be wild about that admission standard.

We have a well established process for asking states about this sort of thing, the US Congress. They don't seem to be wild about the minimum populous state standard, we should ask about the median populous state standard.
If I were a journalist in a dangerous place...

I'd want to buy a AA-battery powered (or just solar powered?) touch screen device that has a USB port that you can physically BREAK OFF after you've uploaded either a pub/private key chain, or just a huge ass one-time-pad.

In my mind, it has a touch screen and a camera with a physical cover you can slide over it. No other ports or antennas or connectivity at all. To send an encrypted message, it flashes a series of QR codes to your smartphone. To receive an encrypted message, you show it a series of QR codes from your smartphone.

Your smartphone or computer sends encrypted messages, but it doesn't actually do the encryption or decryption.
Maybe the AI approach is still useful. I am thinking analysing the AST to measure the impact of a code change, or the complexity of the various components of the project. Some kind of graph analysis to measure complexity and maintainability on a project level.
Xfinity in SF bay area is $80/mo for 1GB down fiber... :/
You can shop for deals from USA to Panama, it's wild.

There is no reason to give the Canadian incumbents any more money.
i dunno-- i grew up playing around with every distro of linux and unix i could get my hands on, and my first was Slackware/LILO. a lot of the so-called "expert" tools _work_ in some fashion, but could definitely use a UI/UX improvement.

all of the binutils and basic stuff is pretty antiquated and has an old-school and specific perspective and lot of the modern work we do as developers and operators has use-cases which fall behind due to such a rigid way of thinking.

i think systemd is great, and maybe it's overkill for certain applications, but there are also smaller containers and distros one can use for this. i'm all for modernising linux and the tooling around it, it's sorely needed.
My number for these murders in the US was 119, basically taking a similar wikipedia page as the one that you linked to and adding up mass shootings (I used 3 or more as criteria, chosen because of one definition used in one particular US law) at schools, which I defined as k-12, pretty arbitrarily, just what I thought of as "schools."

That gives more in killings in Germany than the US, really due to their particularly brutal 2000s decade, and which does not seem likely to recur, and the US might benefit from looking at the actions Germany took.

The page you linked to is mostly not school shootings, so I don't think it is a good way to examine my statement.
Being able to tie in the bight seem useful, it means you don't need to have both ends free to tie it.

A taut line hitch is a good choice in most cases though.
Cool.

But a warning, based on doing quite a lot of crawling from home through my own search engine, it's very easy to have your IP or IP-block end up on annoying graylists where basically every other website you visit will throw a CAPTCHA in your face. I'm aware this is a risk and use a VPN for most of my private web surfing anyway so it's not that much of a bother, but it's a bit sketchy to expose other people to that risk through something like this.

It would probably be wise to use canned crawls for major websites, maybe something like trading WARCs <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_ARChive> over bit-torrent or whatever. Most of these types of websites don't change that often in the places that matter.
Only because the garbage truck moved out of the way.
Your question shows a lack of understanding. Many billionaires do not need to work. What keeps them showing up to "jobs"?
they're not even comparable between years
I'm not sure who "you" refers to here.

Your Patently Obvious article refers to patent prosecution, which is different from re-examination. Let's keep referring back to my original 1(A, B, C) and 2(D) example.

A dependent claim is "backup" because the examiner may find that (A, B, C) is not patentable, but coupled with D, you get (A, B, C, D) which is.

This happens all the time in prosecution. So let's say (A, B, C, D) is allowed and issued.

Note that you did not win the right to sell a product with (A, B, C, D), because someone else (Call them CompanyX) has patented (A, B, C) and you are infringing it.

All you've got is the right to exclude anyone, including CompanyX, from selling (A, B, C, D).

If someone else infringes your patent and you sue them, and they're able to prove that 'A' was known in the art, then CompanyX's patent and yours are both invalidated.
Steven Galbraith's Mathematics of Public Key Cryptography: https://www.math.auckland.ac.nz/~sgal018/crypto-book/crypto-...
I'm not even particularly pro-car. One does not have to disagree with your broader perspective in order to be critic of your word choice. I see your frustration as something that comes with the territory. When you use hyperbole in your rhetoric you risk people taking issue with the specific allusion and proceeding to refute it. Probably because refuting that hyperbole can be seen as diminishing the rest of your argument.
I used to run snort but I don't like the "buying rules" thing they do.
And scrum is not agile ("people above processes").
They weren't actually doing much automation for account creation; we would see accounts created from mobile phone providers using mobile UAs, and then after they had an API key we'd see the accounts used from compromised cloud hosting accounts. (Free CI trials were probably a big chunk of this too, but I can't prove that.) The mistake we made was really being too generous with free trials; you need the compute to test our product, but free compute is something you just can't give out these days because of the crypto gold rush. I signed up for fly.io recently and they just ask you for a credit card as soon as you hit "create account". We were scared of that at the time, but I thought it was completely reasonable.
Yes, it's better for children to be murdered at home.
Private Click Measurement: Conversion Fraud Prevention, Replace Tracking Pixels
"But it does not change that the autonomous machine does not understand the complex world it is driving in in the slightest, and that, for example, swerving into an unmanned fruit stand without being able to brake is much better than swerving into an unmanned gas pump."

It seems it would have a way of prioritizing such things. That doesn't seem particularly complicated, to be honest... weighted decision making is certainly within its capacity. E.g. shopping cart has fewer "avoid hitting" points than stroller.

It's not like every scenario has to be explicitly programmed in, nor does the program need to run some analysis on a detailed backstory to justify that a baby is more valuable than groceries. In effect, somebody -- probably not a programmer either -- just needs to enter some numbers into a spreadsheet.

(yes there is complex programming that allows that to be manifested in the car's decisions, but the idea that programmers are themselves constantly making "moral calls" in the code, rather than the control data, is fiction)

And if it does have such prioritization in its logic, I'd say yeah, it "understands" the world in that respect. Unless you have defined the word "understand" in some mystical way that precludes non-biological machines by definition.
I mean, not backing up into cross traffic at the intersection is also a good thing. I’ve seen accidents where cars got out of the way of an emergency vehicle only to crash into another.
A driver license endorsement for heavy vehicles would do more for safety than a tax.
Classic Red Hat. Arrogant and agressive. Reinventing the wheel. Usually also one or a handful of developers per project.
- Some Linux users aren't fans of super-projects.

- Some Linux users really like modularity and composability ("do one thing") to the point of considering it a core tenet of unix-alikes overall.

- Systemd is perceived as being a super-project that is not practically modular and composable (though it may hypothetically be so)

- Some see systemd and related activity in Gnome and elsewhere as Red Hat bullying their way into excessive control over the direction of Linux.

- Mistrust of Poettering and the general attitude and competence of developers on the project—some of this hostility dates back to pulse audio, another Poettering/Red-Hat project that was seen by many as technically deficient, led by people with excessive hubris without the know-how or taste to back it up, and excessively/unjustifiably promoted by Red Hat and Poettering through political maneuvering.

- Concern that due to all of the above it represents: a power-grab by a single actor over Linux; a risk to Linux security and stability; and a risk to the future maintainability of, and practical transparency to the user of, Linux due to the scope, complexity, and architecture of the project, coupled with its heavy dependence on a single benefactor.
Using bots to monopolize the supply and maximize their own profits is rent-seeking by an economic leech, not a service.
I thought competition is what keeps markets working efficiently. Without competition, what's the motivation to actually share innovation when it is not needed to maximize profits, as innovation is much more costly than maintaining the status quo?
I guess I'd offer 2 big points.

First, systemd came in and replaced a lot of the base OS, happily changing things to be... either "modern and designed with hindsight" or "breaking compatibility because they could", depending on your viewpoint. As an end user it was mostly invisible, but anyone mucking around under the hood got half the engine replaced on them, and it was not appreciated. (A major example would be the journal; for 40 years logs went into nice flat text files that could be watched with tail(1) or searched with grep(1), and then systemd came along and moved logs into a binary format that forced you to go through journalctl to access anything.)

Second, systemd can be viewed as "playing dirty" in the way that it was pushed through the ecosystem. It was viewed as Red Hat pushing their preferred solution by leveraging what should have been unrelated packages - udev went from an init-agnostic database of hardware and rules engine to being part of systemd and everyone else had to factor it back out, GNOME made systemd a dependency, that kind of thing. Further, the developers tend to take a... "our way is right and anyone who disagrees is out of touch" view, while being remarkably blind to other systems; my favorite was https://github.com/tmux/tmux/issues/428 , wherein they wanted tmux (a portable program hailing from the BSD side of the ecosystem) to abandon existing daemonization code and go with a systemd-specific approach. They even came out and said that they were happy to try and make things harder for people who didn't accept their way - why try convincing someone to adopt your approach when you can just modify the ecosystem to progressively make it harder for them to do things their way (https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2010-Se...)?
I've definitely thought about finally leaving the Bay Area, previously I'd written off a lot of places because I want to be close to the coast and I love the relatively mild weather. More recently I ended up talking with a park ranger about life out here (he's from Truckee). He was real attracted to the Oregon coast but aghast at the white supremacy issues that are still ripe up there. There's always a catch.

Now? Politics and infrastructure put me off of huge chunks of the country (especially Texas and Florida). I don't really care if Austin is a vibrant metro area when the state government is trying to ensure women have subhuman status at most even if they've got to gut our judicial system to do it. Small town Texas? Absolutely fucking not, doubly so if I actually wanted to raise a family. Then again the Bay Area is my home.
I don't know what you are going on about.

People have a duty to know what their bodies need, and make good choices for themselves. Expecting the government to do everything for them doesn't work.

Whether or not government exists or not, the primary responsbility is on the consumer. Just because companies sell it doesn't mean you have to buy it.

If the government doesn't enforce labels, sensible consumers can pool their funds and pay laboratories to analyze the food for them, and they can advice their friends and family if those food stuffs are decent enough.

Governments themselves are corporate entities whose chief executives seek employment with the very companies they are supposed to regulate.

Why do any intelligent consumers believe they can be relied on?
Referendum will not happen due to the low support of Russia in Kherson. The situation is not the same as it was in Crimea in 2014.
That "do one thing well" ship sailed decades ago, when ls added sorting. I don't recall the date, but I believe ls has had sorting for more years than it hadn't, possibly a lot more.

ls is not Unixy, find is not Unixy, wget/curl are not Unixy, the list is infinite.
I've been running systemd free debian for years. It may be that you hit an edge case, and I bet that was with a display manager most likely?

I run sawfish, and trinity, no problems with either...
You couldn't have been interested for that long. Crypto mining took a big hit in 2018. The market was flooded with used GTX 10-series GPUs. When Nvidia's RTX cards launched in August, they were somewhat difficult to find for a couple of months but by the start of 2019 they were actually struggling to move inventory because used mining GPUs were still flooding the market for so little money. GPUs were not hard to buy again until the pandemic started and demand skyrocketed during lockdowns.
I suspect that AWS has done some SEO work. It is very hard to find an AWS content that is not from the docs. This probably makes it harder to rank up the newest versions of the docs too?
Lennart came down from heaven (or, depending on your perspective, up from hell)
and looked at the state of linux distributions.

He said, "This sucks. Boot times are slow. Distros have a mish-mash of init
systems and shell scripts, all subtlety different. Linux features like cgroups,
which are the bee's knees, are left as an exercise to the sysadmin. Why aren't
user processes manageable? etc."

Thus systemd decided it was going to standardize a new layer between the linux
kernel and userspace using a declarative model for configuration for... like
everything. This was a huge change in the linux world. A huge change was going
to be controversial. Systemd is still controversial.

Systemd won though.
Does anyone know of a way to list number of commits to a project by email domain? Is that even possible?
see top parent comment, its nowhere near as simple as weight adds dust, and hasn't been since brake pad tech changed about 20 years ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brake_pad#Materials
> If it ain’t broke…

And then there's systemd-resolved…
No but there is way less dependence on cars, at least in medium cities and up. Many developments in america just build suburban deserts where there is just more single family homes around you, where you have to drive to the next supermarket, both because it's so far away, and because sometimes there literally isn't a way for pedestrians to walk on. There are a few good videos on the subject:

* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajSEIdjkU8E

* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnKIVX968PQ

* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ul_xzyCDT98
As long as it keeps working, I'm happy with 'runit'. I'm not sure what needs to be updated. It runs my boot scripts, it starts my service manager. It's been reliable for over 15 years, across hundreds of installs, in a wide variety of contexts. Importantly, it has never created problems for me when trying to rescue a system.
The alternatives all exist and work fine. Init still works great too. And if you need auto "healing" daemons and such you can even use daemontools. There are a slew of actively developed well supported alternatives you can use today. And it's not so much the opinionated nature of the systemd pushers that's obnoxious, it's the fact that the software is enormous, buggy, and insecure.
I know a bunch of people that this happened to. There’s a whole group who stopped gaming entirely bc of all this