skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Imagine when the processor and materials become cheaper. You could have very large hex boards that support many game maps and pieces. With touch control, it would be fun have gestures to move and combat with the stacks of pieces.
This doesn’t make anything I said less true.
>imo this is why people shouldn't cheat. If nobody cheats, the grades might on average be lower but once the class is curved or assignments are dropped it will be a fair indicator of where everyone is at.

An excellent example of the prisoner's dilemma.
WordBASIC
In Swedish they are "daggmask" which translates literally as "dew-worm", so the moisture connection is clearly there, too. Fun!
This is a conspicuously narrow view on what politics are.

A professional association or licensing board or whatever similar structure, regardless of whether or not it is embedded in government, is textbook political.

That's entirely separate from the issue of whether or not they exercise restraint and engage constructively when their credibility is challenged.
I have been thinking about 3D printing some hex pieces out of PLA, embedding some small magnets in the periphery, and painting them...

Unfortunately my modeling skills are much stronger with geometric primitives like cuboids, cylinders, and spheroids than with mountains, forests, pastures, clay quarries, and wheat fields!
The top response is the one that brought the constraint of "scale" into this discussion, and that's what I'm addressing. Maybe you should bring your objections to them rather than to me. "Real-world resource constraints" is just a euphemism for "wanting to save money" in this case. I'll edit it to clarify that I mean the same.

And I'm not passing judgement on the choice made, nor saying the constraints aren't there, nor saying anyone should do anything different. I'm just pointing out that the scalability constraint will affect the test possibilities, which will affect the quality of the measurement. Feel free to disagree with this all you want.

EDIT: Also, I do happen to have some inside knowledge by having worked in higher education for about a decade, starting in the mid 00s. Coincidentally, most of my work was on cost-saving measurements, designing a few algorithms that allowed universities to reduce their teacher headcount (first at a university, then at a software vendor), so yes, the #1 goal there was saving money. But I don't think having done this affects my answer, nor I do think that I deserve special treatment. I'm merely answering to a chain of comments.
It is arbitrary but that doesn't make it meaningless. "Just use one font" is the "just eat only soylent" of typography. It ignores or dismisses the fact that arbitrary aesthetic factors do affect us and how we approach or receive a text.
Now that the 3090 prices are terrestrial again, wondering if it's worth holding off for a 4090 if they really do end up doing ~50% more CUDA processing. But then I remember the pandemonium of the 3000 series release. Fool me once, shame on me, but fool me twice, well... May as well get the 3090 while I can
None of them are fat enough to convincingly pull off American. We're a portly bunch.
The economic waste that comes from bad code is death from a thousand cuts. Poor reuse and composability resulting in duplicated work, corner cases resulting in cascading errors, seconds of lag adding up to days or weeks of wasted time - years if at Google scale.

Put in this way, the more software there is, the better programmers we want. But the cost itself is typically externalized over the consumer base and amortized over the lifecycle of these products. Further, the perception of software developers being a cost centre first and foremost is sustained. You surpass these problems by being skilled.
Yes, they pursued migration because they considered it to be economically beneficial. But their electoral coalition also included groups which disliked it - retirees in particular, and some parts of the older white working class vote too as you note. So the action to increase 'good' migration was never really openly argued for as a public good (your quote is from an advisor, and would never have been released at the time) while being matched with Mail-placating rhetoric on asylum designed to separate the idea of deserving and undeserving migrants and demonstrate 'getting tough' on those who were sufficiently unpopular. There was a huge increase in the use of immigration detention, for example, and the deliberate destitution of many asylum seekers as a means of appearing tough. As with many New Labour policy areas, the aim was not to get the policy 'right' and leave it, but to keep the issue live to generate a steady series of headlines indicating that something was being done. Criminal justice policy was similar, with more than one reform bill a year for most of the period of the government.

So overall, I don't see deliberately increasing migration and deliberately using dehumanising rhetoric and policy changes against (some) immigrants to shore up electoral support as being at odds. The current government is strong on anti-tax rhetoric whilst presiding over heavy tax rises. Labour wanted immigration to keep wages low and increase growth. It also wanted the votes of people who wouldn't want that. So it did the former fairly quietly, while performatively stoking up the Home Office's capacity for villainy. So is modern politics.

(FWIW 'Floodgates' is itself somewhat dehumanising, I think: people aren't an undifferentiated mass threatening to overwhelm the boat, they're just people. 'Gates' would have done just fine.)
VR seems to have an insurmountable motion sickness problem. I tried the Quest with a dozen friends and half of them felt sick enough within minutes to never try it again.
Isn't the main reason the amount of fuel required to fly supersonic?
?

I dont understand what you mean. You may be confusing with other user. Nevermind.
> I'd be bothered with my own stupidity if i did not cheat.

What? I'd be bothered with my own stupidity if I felt I couldn't get a good grade without cheating. I put in a minimal amount of time/effort in university where the subject matter didn't interest me, but always did fine without cheating.
What's an FP?
There's still a bomb deep in the muck somewhere off of Georgia (US) too.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1958_Tybee_Island_mid-air_coll...
As someone who went to a mid-tier state university for computer engineering in undergrad, I kinda disagree. The classes were not going to push into great depth on the topics. But there was plenty of opportunity to push myself beyond the classes, like doing independent study or research with professors.
But it is much more than a oral one.
Interesting. I think this is only a problem because npm made the "files" attribute optional.

To be honest, I can't see why you would ever want an include by default approach to package building not explicit inclusion.
This site does not teach you anything about "great typography", but rather presents someones personal preferences as such.
https://archive.ph/abiMg
I'd say everyone has been a student so they all have an opinion. Its ripe for bikeshedding. That's the reason imho.
You’ll find people denying that nationalism or Brexit or anti EU politics has anything to do with xenophobia, usually coupled with “your attitude is exactly why we voted leave” as if by noticing the xenophobia, Brexit is your fault.

Anyway, many voters quite literally spoke into camera saying directly that they voted leave to “stop Muslims” and things like this. If you point this out, or point out that all racists and extremist nationalists supported Brexit they’ll further deny and claim it’s just an extreme minority that doesn’t matter. Or they’ll say “what about antifa!” Or some other strange comment.

Anyway here’s one example of a voter clearly saying why they voted

https://youtu.be/SFjfbL1KWNI

Also Tory party voting is a minority in the uk. The uk “democracy” gives a party with 40% vote share absolute power and absolute parliamentary majority.
>I would enjoy it when hiring people if there would be more specific credentials to the role I want to hire for.

There are plenty of credentials out there. You just mostly don't get them from universities because universities are not in general in the business of granting trade credentials.
As far as I can tell, building a similar system using NVMe is vastly more complicated. If you can fit everything into M.2 slots, it’s easy. Otherwise you need barely-standardized PCIe cards, backplanes, connectors ordered off a menu of enterprise things with bizarre model numbers, and possibly “RAID” cards even though you don’t actually want hardware RAID.
Do you want to be a physicist or understand physics? Two very different things.

If you want to BE A PHYSICIST learn a lot of math + work somewhere they do their work. Try to network and find someplace you can be a scientific programmer for a yearish.

If you just want to UNDERSTAND physics, start reading primary sources rather than shit like Wired.

Often there is a type of person that exploits that gap between say, an ARXIV print to going to a conference to going to a journal to being presented at a conference... where then a journalist sits down, observes the presentation, and writes it up, to sound smarter than they are.

I don't like that kind of person.

Hope the above is helpful!
How can we say "Apple did the right call" without knowing what their call was, knowing if this article is true, knowing what the product even looks like, or even knowing how successful the product was relative to the rest of their lineup? For all we know, this project is scrapped and dead.
A calculator contained in an entire URL
More broadly, if we include Mercury and Gemini, it was a tremendous success in the sense of developing Astronautics as a whole. I won’t cite specific spin-offs, but the impetus to land on the moon so rapidly necessarily meant learning how to do things like rendezvous and establish communication networks.

>”It was an artificially inflated exercise in national ego. In no way was it worth the money expended on it.”

There is way more to it than mere pride. President Kennedy and LBJ decided to push hard with the space race as a means of economic warfare against the Soviets. The strategy was twofold: one, to get the Soviets to commit resources to their own moonshot program when they otherwise would not. We were betting on our economy being stronger than theirs, and we could force them to catch up to us. Two, to develop American industry and expertise when we had clearly fallen behind. The spending might seem wasteful but it created a ton of jobs and bootstrapped our space industry. We essentially closed the whole “missile gap” in about 7 years as a result.
You can also just hop on, without any planning, in Germany anyway, and the price will only be expensive, not outrageous.

An ICE is no different than a bus in this regard. A flight is a totally different story, probably planned weeks in advance and stress starts on the morning the day of.
No bending required. Marcus literally says you are a soldier who must perform his duty over and over again.
> They probably don't think of it as lying. They just write down every possible thing they've ever thought or read about and exaggerate, gambling that they'll never be called on it.

Well, job postings are infamous for listing a ridiculous number of "requirements" that aren't really requirements. Those who are familiar with hiring know that job postings themselves are lies and encourage people to ignore the requirements and apply anyway. Even the people who work for the hiring company say this! So it's a two-way street. There are already perverse incentives created by the hiring companies. And we also know that resumes are screened for specific buzzwords. You may not be recruited or interviewed unless unless your resume has the right buzzwords.
Fun! But a heavy emphasis on doing things by eye. Personally I prefer the results of following stricter rules extracted from print typesetting. A few examples:

- I recommend reading about [vertical rhythm](https://24ways.org/2006/compose-to-a-vertical-rhythm), which turns a lot of imprecise choice to exactly correct sizes.

- I've never heard of there being a rule for how much space goes above a paragraph (this is a funny thing about web typography, since in print you indent the paragraph so there's no additional space). But I guess I'd consider it correct from a vertical rhythm standpoint to either use the line height or half of it.

- Regarding vertical space between lines, what I've heard is you want to make the spacing between lines visually appear greater than the space between words. As far as I know this is just done by eye. (I.e., so the rule is to choose a leading that makes your space between lines appear larger than the space between words.)

- I think there are exact header sizes that are better than picking an arbitrary font size that seems to look big enough. The trick I use here is to take the [traditional point scale](https://markboulton.co.uk/journal/five-simple-steps-to-bette...) and convert it to a ratio relative to 12 point. This is a way to bake historically refined font ratios into your design.

- Personally, when choosing margins I'd use a [grid system](https://practicaltypography.com/grids.html), which will give you an exact gutter size. But admittedly this isn't too important for a single column of text.

- There's simple rules that are missing here like make sure your width allows for 7-12 words per line, which [research](https://baymard.com/blog/line-length-readability) has illustrated improved readability.

- Another good missing rule is never use any two font treatments on the same page that are too similar to each other. This usually means having two things different between two font treatments, e.g., a different font size and weight for say a subheading vs. a heading.
> I would let 100 people cheat if it meant I was sure 1 innocent student wasn’t punished unjustly.

This makes sense in the justice system, but in the justice system you often can find proof as to what happened, so the system still acts as a deterrent even if a fraction criminals get away with no punishment. In university assignments, most of the time it's practically impossible to find evidence of who copied from whom, so applying that principle would basically mean no enforcement, that everyone would be free to cheat and assignments would just not make sense at all.

Also, failing a course is far from such a big deal as going to jail or paying a fine. At least in my country, you can take the course again next year and the impact on your GPA is zero or negligible. You will have an entry in your academic record saying that you failed in the first attempt, but it won't be any different from that of someone who failed due to, e.g., illness.

If the consequences were harsher (e.g. being expelled from the institution, or something like that) then I would agree with you.
Or to phrase it another way, let’s listen whatever racist, draconian, bigoted policies or statements my local leader(who I am powerless to influence, I’ve tried) has to say today.

If a good health check to my political views comes at the price of an awful mental health check, I’ll pass.

I will seek balanced views. Not a car salesman with the power to influence lives.
All pickup trucks in Poland have been sent to Ukraine and are now used by the Ukrainian Territorial Defense Forces
I'm currently grading an open book test as you describe. It turns out that someone put their attempt at answers on chegg.com shortly after I posted the test. The temptation to use chegg is too great for students to resist. When chegg has the wrong solution (which is often the case), students will doubt themselves and will go with the wrong chegg answer.

To be clear, the only goal of chegg.com is to help students cheat. The world would be a better place if chegg and its copies did not exist.
You can use pcie switches on pcie x4 to 4xM.2x4 drives.
ClojureScript: Differences from Clojure
I must be super deterministic as well because the alternative you describe sounds … unuseful to me. If we can have illusions like that then all the conclusion you extract from that are also subject to the same effect: it’s not necessarily true that QM can account for it; we could also be “allucinating”collectively that they can account for it. Or, we might not exist at all and all perceptions are all fake.

Once you introduce a malicious devil like that it always goes “full universe”. Say, this religious group knocks on your door, tells you that Earth is 2022 years old. You point to dinosaur fossils. They say the Devil put them there to trick us. But then, you follow, our whole existence might as well be fake. The Devil could have created both of us 5 minutes ago, with fake memories of a life that never existed, just so we could have this conversation. And we will both vanish when I close this door (blam!). The usual counter is that the devil has a very specific amount of power: triceratops head is ok, humans is too much. But even accepting that, how can you know you are a human? It might be the Devil tricking you again, maybe you are a teacup that thinks they are human.
This was my first thought too. How are they planning on chaining these together? Sounds like a non-starter.
I agree with the rules and will follow them better in the future. Unfortunately this article and the comments are incredibly misleading and have a high potential for misinformation.
I use temporary containers in combination with incognito mode — I often like having history.
>Flying it is also more complicated

This was something that always made me think about the difficulties of flying something with multiple sources of lift.
I can tell you that almost every teacher who is not burnt out, does care about how we measure knowledge, mainly because they have to. The big difficulty is that there are two roles for teachers, on one hand you are a mentor and supposed to impart knowledge onto your students (the teaching part). On the other hand you are a gatekeeper, you are supposed to check that the thresholds for some qualification are met. Now if we had an ideal way to measure knowledge those two roles would not really be in conflict with ech other, but because we don't teachers have the difficult job of trying to teach a subject and at the same time find a good way to see if the students actually learnt what the were supposed to. All that with a limited amount of time that is available.
If only I had any crocodile tears left for the brave men and women who dedicate their lives to undermining the sanctity and privacy of our American existence...
I read the article, and still don't see what is being proposed.

> we need to intentionally return to our traditional pattern of development, one based on creating neighborhoods of value, scaled to actual people. When we do this, we will inevitably rediscover our traditional values of prudence and thrift as well as the value of community and place.

So, less suburbs and more what?
There is no proof of dark matter which nasa is quite fond of stating as literal fact without any experimental proof, or measurement. When I win the lottery which I don't play I'll be sure to make my experiment with liquid hydrogen. Hopefully I don't blow myself up in the process. Even at a winnings of a million dollars I may get closer to unlocking the secret of gravity than the large dadron collider ever will with tens of billions behind it.
> Testing .. HOW do you measure knowledge

To me measuring knowledge is a minor reason of having tests. The main reason is to force students to study. If you have no test on knowledge most people will just gloss over the detail and not learn.
I built https://onlineornot.com entirely in Next.js

This lets me host my marketing pages as static pages, and the app pages at /app - works really well, no messing around with separate builds, would highly recommend it.
In terms of maximizing legibility, limiting the line length and increasing line height/spacing/leading is something so easy and so valuable. The rest feels stylistic (and that totally has its place) and not ESSENTIAL to legibility.
The difference is that this website is accessed by humans, while API's are accessed by programs.
The period with Fitzcaraldo, Agguire Wrath of God, and Cobra Verde was amazing.
Apple’s hidden flight tracker app
To quote Warren Buffet -- "Only when the tide goes out do you discover who's been swimming naked." That's one of the main points of Strong Towns; a focus on resiliency. Down turns in the economy, be it one oversized local sector (a local coal mine maybe) or all sectors (e.g. GFC), can be a trigger for a collapse; especially for a community that has focused all it's efficiency on that (those) sectors. If there's nothing left in the tank when the bad times come you only have one option left, collapse (and quite often a cascading collapse). Here's a term I just came up with; Sociological margin call.
Interesting, how do the other sports leagues get away with “illegal” collusion?

Yes, I understand why it has to be that way to make the league interesting and competitive.
Do you also support "free speech zones"? After all, you can still protest, just in the designated area in the middle of nowhere.
ERCOT’s CEO was fired over the incident im sure you are referring to. fired within weeks.

Who’s getting fired over California’s blackouts? Let me guess, it’s all just climate change?
To me, this has been the largest advantage of learning things at my own pace instead of in a classroom environment. Even as a student I recognized early on that topics that'd stump me would often click months later. By then it was too late for my grade, but I'd go back and realize that other things I'd learned in the interim made it easy.

So now when I find something blocking me, I just go learn something else instead. And what do you know, some combination of more wisdom, broader knowledge, or perhaps just a different mental state often works.