skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It gets much better when you disable search suggestions then you only have results from your browsing history/bookmarks. And in the end if you get no results you just launch a search anyways.

There was a way to configure the relative weight of boomarks/history but I can't find it anymore.

Also worthy of notice, if you start with * in the search bar you only get bookmarks results and with ^ you get history results. Finally % is for tabs (on synced devices too) !
Maybe return the items it found so far and provide the cursor it failed on? Have a way to optionally provide the cursor? I can think of some ways I'd implement this in an SDK. Probably for simplicity I'd have some sort of JSON status field indicating the request (traversing all cursors) completed. If it's not complete I still would look for the next cursor it returned and do the usual thing manually.
They almost always conveniently only recommend products that allow for referral fees.
The problem is that LiveView forces synchronous operation, whereas a significant fraction of things that would require a server trip anyway could actually be done asynchronously—that is, as far as the UI is concerned, they actually don’t require a server trip; not immediately, anyway, and the UI should only care about the immediate.

When you control server interactions on the client side, you can do things like optimistic editing, where the UI assumes the action will succeed and then does it in the background, and then handles the exceptional case where something goes wrong, most likely by returning you to a form; or things like queuing actions up when there’s no internet connection, and performing them when you get a connection again.

I want to emphasise again the importance of latency. I live in Australia. Most of the web is much slower in Australia than it is in the USA, not because of bandwidth, but because of latency.

The LiveView approach is convenient, but it’s technically not a good solution for most applications. It’s excellent for things like chat systems where being bound to synchronous operation and requiring a network connection to do things isn’t an issue, but I honestly don’t think it’s the best solution (technically, again; socially it may be) for much else.
...and even the richest people will deny the reality of that through their religion.
Should keep 4 people well hydrated if it can run all day, would probably keep 10-15 alive for a while until rescue. Half those numbers if it only works when the sun is out.

I'm not one to call a technology revolutionary at the drop of a hat (most of the time it isn't a new technology but instead another website) but this seems world changing if it pans out.
This triple buffer is a new one on me, super clever thanks for sharing this.
As Mike Tyson says: "Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth!"

A 100 day personal "plan" sounds good from a management point of view. But if you have to frequently revisit that plan and change it over and over, it's perhaps better to reconsider your time scales.

I'm sure there's some elite workplaces which are run like well-oiled machines, where the word "onboarding" means something and where people actually care how newcomers integrate. But far more common is a chaotic environment, not just when there's "fast growth" but also garden variety "Dilbert-ian" dysfunction or outright toxicity and non-cooperation. In these more common situations I think a much greater emphasis on relationship building works better and MUCH shorter time scales for "a plan"-- like 2 weeks at a time until the place starts to make sense and you know where the cliffs and sharp edges are.
This is called Cove Lighting for anyone wanting to research this.

I'm remodeling a 12'x12' bedroom to be my office and lighting is a huge part of my plan. I'll do cove lighting like this using CRI 95+ LED strips dimmable ~500lumen/ft either 4000K or 5000K. Haven't decided on the color temp. You lose a lot of CRI going to a temp adjustable strip.
Agreed, this direction is underestimated and should be developed better -- we (Postgres.ai) do it for any Postgres with our Database Lab Engine [1], and Neon would bring even more power if it's installed on production

[1] https://github.com/postgres-ai/database-lab-engine
I'm a Tribes 1 and 2 vet. I think the largest games I played were still capped at 64 people. It was definitely some impressive network code, for sure. Latency was still a huge issue, but what really helped that game out was the fact that it basically required being able to accurately predict everything yourself. You constantly had to predict how high up you could jetpack, when to initiate the jetpack, where you should land on a slope, where you should jump from, where to shoot "ahead" to get "mid-air" shots (shooting people in the air as they're jetting past you at incredible speeds). This act of priming oneself to the game's fast-paced environment made the latency far more tolerable than it probably would have been.
I see developers ignore this guidance all the time.

They can’t write or articulate their concerns clearly. They are willing to argue their concerns during meetings but it feels like time wasting posturing for self-serving grand standing. Don’t waste peoples time with your stumbling bullshit. Be great then be done. The end.

Strong communication is a pillar of an effective organization, a competent work culture. Other pillars include strong leadership, a clear vision, and quality controls.
Firefox Android’s can install the “Google Search Fixer” add-on to request the full Google Search UI (by sending a Chrome User-Agent string to google.com):

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/android/addon/google-search...
Well.. I think they're over-stated because of the current wave of AI basically only having naïve compression as its tool.

Is the concept `addition` a compression of the space `(Int, Int, Int)` ?

If you want to say it is, OK for some definition of compression. But that compression isnt "mere" in the modern AI sense, it's "exponentially dense".

In that my concept `addition` can generate arbitrarily large amounts of that decompressed space, which is infinite in size.

There's a kind of trick played in the marketing here: since NNs compress, and since learning "can be seen as compression", NNs learn... no, because NNs aren't "exponentially dense", they're "exponentially large" -- I'd claim, the opposite of learning!
If you're going to just completely refuse to engage with the three times you've been reminded in this thread that an economically viable scalper's resales definitionally represent the minimum demand for a product, you're either arguing in bad faith or are too pissed about this to think straight, and I'm just wasting my time. Scalping is obviously an emotional topic for you and it has you so wound up that you're saying stupid shit like this:

>these absolute useless low-lifes that should be unceremoniously kicked back into whatever minimum wage gutter they crawled out of.

If your perception of this situation is that minimum wage "useless low-lifes" should kicked back into the gutter because you have this logically unsound idea that it would be easier to buy a PS5 if scalpers didn't exist, you've lost the plot. Your understanding of the demographic that is doing this is wrong, and even if it wasn't, you have completely uncalled for contempt for a class of people who are trying to do better for themselves (or maybe even just trying to make rent and groceries).

If you're going to leave another comment hollering about rent seeking or how scalpers singlehandedly create this problem, but refuse to even acknowledge that you've already been told:

>The scalpers are selling them to somebody -- that somebody would have just bought at MSRP and you would still have to do what I mentioned above.

>because the scalpers definitionally need somebody to buy everything that they do. The demand isn't erased just because they don't exist.

>The fact that scalpers are still buying consoles means they're still selling them. That means if the scalpers didn't exist consoles would still be sold out, it would just be individuals following twitter accounts to spam refresh for a single console instead of 10.

I'm just going to ignore it, so you can save yourself the typing. I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt but it looks a hell of a lot like you don't have interest in a good faith discussion.
When you see someone standing 3m away from you, the light took 10 nanoseconds to reach your eye, so you see them as they were a very short time ago. Of course, they're only younger when measuring their age not from their birth but from the big bang.
I'm a smoker, and it stinks and affects other people around directly.

It makes sense that it's different than things that don't drink and affects others directly.

I don't feel like smokers are vilified at all, people just don't like to stand or have to work in their smoke.
I think this is overall very accurate and owning one’s own onboarding is a productive framing. For the content of the introductory meetings, beyond a beginner’s mindset, I’ve found the idea of ‘generating pull’ useful. If you’re looking for specific places where mutual wins can happen (and have some flexibility on what you’re working on), your new colleagues will be a lot more invested in working together, and you’ll probably get up at speed a lot faster.
From the article:

> Shortly after the divorce, Charlie learned that his son, Teddy, had leukemia.

What exactly is your solution?
This is a very good guess, and I believe it's precisely how it's done. Doing anything diff-ing the color channels still requires a lossy transformation step, so it's not quite as "raw."

And you're right, that treating it as a single monochrome image makes it less compressible, because you get lots of high frequency information between adjacent pixels with different color. Which is sort of the opposite of what you want.

Note also that, despite calling it "raw," Red's implementation is lossily compressed. You can even tune the compression ratio of their "raw" codec, and back in the very early days, there was certain subject matter that just looked terrible coming out of the camera, even as raw -- I remember one particular tree that an early user would film to test new firmware updates; in the earliest firmware builds, it actually crashed the camera (!). The images it did produce showed tons of wavelet compression artifacts.
Do you have any example illusions? Lately I notice that I read a lot of sentences wrong, and a second reading gives different words (though both readings were made up of similar letters), perhaps my feedback loop is too strong on the prediction?
Of course, it solves a lot of problems. But you have to pay for it by increasing the load on the servers by orders of magnitude. This makes it a brute force approach in my opinion.

This is of course depending on your meaning of „elegant“, but for me this would imply to solve these issues without increasing the server load so much. Let the client decide as much as possible, but check the decisions randomly and in case of suspicious player stats.
And DRM for multiplayer games should be no problem anyways? Verify the accounts or your users, but that applies to stadia like services and also the „conventional“ ones.
Solving the data mining issue is another topic and yes, giving the server more authority for things that the player should be able to see might be the only way to deal with this. But maybe the server could hand out client specific decryption keys when they are needed? That would be elegant, and not just keeping all the content server-side.

Game streaming services will find their place, but they address mainly the entry hurdle and not the issue of game state synchronization.
The problem with Aurora's thin clones is extra cost each clone adds

For CI/CD, you want multiple clones running on the same compute power, in a shared environment, to keep the budget constant
I don't see how I can concede a point I never contested, but ok.

>> I don’t want to devalue their savings.

>Hallelujah! I do presume this means the /kind/ of savings or /where/ it's held is immaterial.

It's absolutely material, but it's their choice not mine. If they choose to invest unwisely then that can have unfortunate consequences (assuming no crime was committed, that's a different question). Can I guarantee the savings of people who unwisely invest in swamp land? No. Do you think I or anyone else should? So of course the choices people make matter, and have consequences.
There are purely mechanical RO units that weigh less than 5lbs and are used in life rafts
Tried it, could barely get any of the random ones.

How would I be able to guess a $0.03 $2mil market cap token?
This is a topic that fascinates me. Some of it is maybe me wrestling with some of my own frustrations, but this general issue of the pressures of popular demand versus going your own way, and how society attributes credit and value to ideas and discoveries is fascinating to me. Issues like unacknowledged contributions, discoverers, people who withdraw from society and produce contributions that go unknown for a long time, people and institutions ahead of their time, lost books, and so forth.

I think the model western society often collectively adopts for intellectual contributions, credit, how it should all work, and how it actually currently does is fundamentally flawed. Then there's the issue of what motives, incentives, and so forth might be best or most healthy, whether that varies across people and what we might do about it.

The Z List Dead List podcast (https://zlistdeadlist.libsyn.com/) doesn't always focus on the same form of obscurity mentioned by the targeted article but deals with overlapping and similar themes.

Then there's Stigler's Law (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stigler%27s_law_of_eponymy) which is important to keep in mind, among others.
> Colab is an awesome service, so much so that I seldom use my at-home GPU rig.

Can you use Colab from VSCode? Notebooks are great for exploration but not for complex projects.
I'm curious, and not antagonistically, about the size and variability of the infrastructure you're working with, on how many platforms it's running, and how many people are in charge of it.

Is this tool private or available for us to try out?
- "Natural gas power is cheaper than either coal and fission power because they both rely on big, heavy, expensive, inefficient steam turbines."

Most natural gas power plants in the USA use steam turbines. The most common setup is a two-stage "combined cycle": first, an internal-combustion gas turbine, whose waste heat powers a lower temperature steam turbine.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combined_cycle_power_plant

https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=39012 (~90% of natural gas kWh)
What Sex Does
Sadly not open source and their change notes are not yet production ready. Every release something breaks. I switched back to pure wireguard because of this.
I also wouldn't call tailscale and netmakers ui comparable. Netmaker has far more options. Tailscale tries an apple approach by hiding almost everything but DNS.
I specifically mentioned torrenting, please re-read. There is no reason to have all the network I/O of your computer go through an extra hop just for one application (e.g. a torrent client) when that application can be configured to use a proxy instead. It increases the network latency, complexity and attack surface of your system.
I feel like life is a lot better if people prioritize these things in the reverse order of what Winston prescribes. Look at our bureaucracies and you'll see that the people leading it have taken Winston's advice to heart -- excellent speakers, decent writers, and low quality ideas / creativity.

Although personally, I have no desire to become like the people who currently lead our society -- the most 'successful' -- so I guess I'm disagreeing more with his definition of success than his means of achieving it within the bounds he has set.
I find it useful to think of photons as vector clocks:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_clock

Take a photon starting from your chest and give it t1.

* Assume that the speed of light is symmetrical. *

When the photon hits the next person's eyes, it is t1 + distance/speed of light.

Meaning, the photon is "from the past".

Since all photons arriving are from the past, the photons travelling the shortest distance are the newest (representing the largest timestamp).

So, the thing with the largest observable timestamp is yourself.
Just pretend that Teddy doesn't have leukemia. Tell the doctor you don't believe in western medicine. Buy a homeopathic healing crystal (it's just a grain of sand). Deny the reality, deny the feelings. Problem solved.
I tried this out on a paper I like to read, but which only exists as a scan: http://users.cecs.anu.edu.au/~bdm/nauty/pgi.pdf

Mathpix did better than I expected, but still no-where near well enough for me to give the results to anyone without some fairly significant editing. It would certainly speed up creating a latex copy of the paper, but for example whenever something has a subscript and superscript, the superscript seems to be ignored.
I don't think this is true in general. If a rape victim feels like a victim, it's because they are and society should validate that. But if your kid dies and it's no one's fault in particular, the advice given here might help you (or might not).
Sure, maybe...but at the end of the day I watch Biden and I think to myself:

That's just a job like any other, and it was a boring journey to get there as well.

The lost art of amateur craftmanship of every skill is the way to go. It's when you are an amateur that you make the most progress on a time unit basis.

And then you switch craft often once you reach a plateu ranging from social, engineering, music, poetry, leadership etc.
Ask HN: What websites do you check every morning?
People reminisce about the golden age of aviation, but most of the modern complaints are actually that airline deregulation drove down prices, and consumers made it very clear that they'll sacrifice service for cheaper fares. You really do get better service if you pay for it, and modern long-haul business class seating would be unimaginable in the 70's, let alone the suites offered by ME3 carriers.
You couldn't do everything that Terraform does today without a local state, but perhaps that would be a good thing? Call it "Terraform strict mode".

As every application developer knows, duplication of state is a primary source of bugs. To combat this, React/Flux type of architectures became extremely popular where state flows in one direction only. They dictate that, no you can't just cheat a little and use jQuery to modify some element, it _will_ get bulldozed on the next render. And a lot of Terraform headaches do come from this analogous reconciliation of what really is (our cloud env), what we want (our TF code) and this intermediate state of what TF thinks the cloud state is.

So, by saying that you cannot have resources outside those defined by TF there is actually a massive simplification with far reaching consequences possible.

How I imagine the experience would be:

- You could say that your Dev env is a shitshow and always will be, of manually created resources and only partially TFed. But your Production and Staging envs are opted in to "strict mode". This means that if there is a conflict you do only have two options: import the offender or destroy it, and the critical mindset change is that this is a good thing and will save us a lot of tears later on.

- Caching is an orthogonal concern. Terraform mixes these two together to its detriment, but the nature of a cache is such that you can safely blow it away and perhaps the next reconciliation will be slow, but it will be accurate. I also don't believe it would actually be that slow, tools like Cloudcraft map the entire metadata of your account in seconds.

- I find the excuse that some resources don't support tags intellectually lazy. Of the top of my head thinking about it for a minute, could you tag a parent resource with the child metadata you need? E.g. individual DNS records don't have tags, OK tag the Zone with childA=value. Same thing with tag length limits, you can work around it, concatenate values or whatever. However, in a truly strict mode you wouldn't even need metadata in tags because the TF code describes the entire target environment.

I hope Terraform would entertain such a strict stateless mode. Unfortunately it will probably take another tool, because the problem is not so much technical as it is an entire mindset change.
The Google Calendar API leaves a lot to be desired (documentation, etc), but over time what I've found is that it's really well-designed once you understand it.

In their case, they went with a "pageToken" variable which is basically a cursor.

The API has been around for years.
I have totally visited the German speaking part and (being German) was astonished by the lack of dialect or accent in the German spoken there. The last thing I expected, heh.
"Let's experiment with the most dependent provinces first..."

That is what happens when globalists and climatists from Brussels grab you by your... budgets.

Things haven't been going great for Greece since Varoufakis betrayed his voters and local politicians became agents of the EU. Sad!
We are not talking about the age of photons. We are talking about the age of the thing that emits/reflects photons.

The confusion arose because the OP said "you are the oldest thing in the universe you can observe". They should have said "you are the most recent thing in the universe you can observe".
At this point I would say no, but work is in progress to improve in this respect [1].

At my place of work we use some rules [2] to build virtual envs from Bazel dependencies. It's been a great stop-gap for us and allows us to use traditional Python tooling (e.g. PyCharm) with Bazel-managed dependences.

[1] https://github.com/aspect-build/rules_py
[2] https://github.com/cedarai/rules_pyvenv
You of course can disagree, but my experience matches OP too. I understand every country likes to hype up its writers, but at least outside America this is more or less the assessment of its writers:

- Great, incredible writers, worthy of every accolade: Poe, Melville, Faulkner and probably Whitman.

- Good, solid writers, a tier below: Hemingway, Hawthorne, Steinbeck, Pynchon, Dos Passos, Gaddiss and many others...that sort of caliber, nobody will complain if one of them is included among the great writers but nobody will miss them either

- Literary mediocrities, overhyped by a culture with a serious lack of good literature: Frazen, DFW, etc

- All the pulpy and trashy authors.
Legal Versioning
Can this scale? I mean can we build a giant one on the coast of California?
For much of Marcus' life he wasn't able to solve things though. In fact, that's what much of his philosophy talks about, and his (fairly open) history. Much of stoicism is focused around dealing with things you can't change, which also makes this take very odd.
This kind of brings up another point that is interesting about our universe. We're under the impression that every point in the universe is experiencing the same amount of distance from the beginning of the universe from that individual point's frame of reference. But this kind of makes time so fundamentally weird compared to the spacial dimensions. We assume no point in the universe is the center, for instance. And the topology of the universe would look fundamentally different if there were some spacial coordinate (of the three) upon which every point was "pinned." But isn't saying from every individual point's frame of reference the universe is the same age equivalent to making a central point within time at the beginning? aka the big bang, of course, but that also seems to imply something about the topology of the universe for eternity after the big bang, as well. It's got one complicated topology for sure.
I presume it's like Microsoft turning a blind eye to unlicensed use of Windows and Office for home users. When they get hired they already prefer MS solutions they know since they were students.