skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don’t understand your question, but to illustrate the point:

We work often with 3rd party libraries and images provided by those third parties. These are often based straight up on Ubuntu. Nvidia CUDA image is an example of this. Then you are stuck with their python version.

And it’s not as easy as installing your own python version into the image because python dependencies inside those 3rd party images might be installed using OS package managers and not pip so then they are installed to the wrong python version etc. It’s a rabbit hole.

The problem is that at some point Debian/ubuntu decided to repackage python dependencies as apt packages.
Are they regulated or are they illegal? Such schemes have negative worth as they actively harm people.
Yeah, but monkeypox isn't a new one. It's been around since the 70's.
"I'd like to help you, but I can't. I'd like to tell you to take a copy of your policy to Norma Wilcox -- W-I-L-C-O-X -- on the third floor, but I can't. I also don't advise you to fill out a WS-2475 form with our legal department on the second floor. I do not expect someone to get back to you quickly to resolve the matter. I'm sorry, but there's nothing I can do..."
Why they keep avoiding publishing the programing hardware interface of FPGAs?

What are the real reasons?

trash human beings? patent trolls? etc?

yes, I would like to know.
Now I regret “being productive” on my day off instead of playing Dwarf Fortress.

This looks lovely, well done!
Shutting down Fukushima in the years before the earthquake would have been the correct choice no matter what else was going on.
If we were debating at what term we should allow abortions until then I think there is room for discussion. But the extreme position of "no abortions at all at any term" I'm simply uninterested in discussion. It's not that I don't understand their thinking. I simply do not agree and thus do not care to discuss or debate it.

Here is the thing, the majority of people who actually reason and think about these topics have heard the same arguments now for 20 years or more. There is nothing new being said, there is no movement on the position of people on either side, and thus there is no more discussion. All you see is propaganda, which I don't care to engage with. So I vote and donate so that "my side" wins and that's that.
Right, so some things done in private are prohibited, and others are not prohibited. So a right to privacy does not inform us whatsoever as to whether it is prohibited or not prohibited to do a thing.

In all other contexts I know of, the 4th amendment does not grant anyone rights to do things that would otherwise be illegal. It sets careful restrictions on the governments ability to investigate. In other words, the government is prohibited from doing things we consider to be a burden upon people whom the government lacks sufficient reason to suspect. However, given a sufficient reason to suspect them of a crime the government can then fulfill due process and continue in it's investigations of those suspected crimes.

So lets by very precise here. Lets take some action a person might engage in, lets call it 'throwing strings', which is just made up nonsense. To be informative here, we will say that the constitution does not have anything to say regarding throwing strings, and that state or local governments can outlaw it as they see fit. However, in the existence of a right to privacy the act of throwing strings becomes a right under the constitution.

How can a right to unreasonable search and seizure (or however other way privacy is derived) possibly create a right to openly and notoriously throw strings?
Becoming a Magician
Just now seeing this, but yes, every Sunday I try to make a new Eisenhower matrix for my life, and I put high-level tasks in it. It's a great way to not only plan, but to audit, and see which quadrants I'm actually spending my time on.

Tagging your todo list can work, too. I'd probably just tag the urgent-but-not-important stuff — strategic, meaningful, preventative stuff — and then have a policy to prioritize those tasks as much as possible, even if it means other things slide.
The 3 ETH was the gas fees for the transactions. (Some went to deploying the attacking contract, some went to contract interactions afterwards.)

With a flash loan, the funds must be returned by the end of the transaction, or the transaction fails. This makes the completion of the transaction the collateral, as if it fails at any point, all transactions (including the loan) get reverted.
Matt Damon, for one.

Kim Kardashian and Floyd Maywether are being sued for shilling Ethereum Max (lol) [1]

Quentin Tarantino for NFTs re Pulp Fiction.

Jake Paul of course, with his Dink Doinks.

Nick Carter, Ben Phillips, Soulja Boy and Lil Yachty re: Safemoon.

Need I go on?

[1] https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/12/kim-kardashian-and-floyd-may...
Fine; I'll show you 100k children under the age of 3 entering the foster care system each year.
Yes! I do my best to make it more attractive for my daughters and since they still don't know how to read, they always remember the story from the picture
Remote controlled drones only work reliably at short range. At longer ranges they stop working once the enemy knocks out your communications relays. Communications satellites are no longer survivable. In the future AI technology might solve the problem but outside of simple loitering munitions, AI can't do much today. In some scenarios we may see drones controlled by manned aircraft that are just a few miles behind and still within communications line of sight.

Maneuverability doesn't count for a whole lot in the real world. For manned aircraft the trend is to de-emphasize maneuverability in favor of signature reduction, ECM, and decoys. While it's theoretically possible to design a UCAV that could pull >9Gs, in practice it's totally pointless. That would make the airframe too heavy and expensive, and would adversely impact other more important qualities like endurance and magazine depth.
Where in the U.S. (other than in the military, where different structures apply) has anyone been compelled to be vaccinated?
Meanwhile trespassing is only a misdemeanor. Hopefully nobody decides to sleep on the lawns of the legislators.

https://www.findlaw.com/state/tennessee-law/tennessee-crimin...
If there is a causal relationship between number of parents and children's erudition, then I think you've made a good argument for the nuclear family and a great argument for polygamy. :)
I had smallpox growing up in a third world country, how protective would the immunity be going against that?
I agree with this. The slack is just the core developers discussing further development and tickets. The documentation is lacking big time. The only response to this is to raise PRs to improve docs.
Make sure to checkout ploomber, our support is seamless tons of docs (https://docs.ploomber.io/) and we take our users seriously. P.S. We integrate with airflow and other orchestrators if you still need to tackle those.
> the only in bounds way to convince me to change my mind about them is to show me that my beliefs are inconsistent

No, you can also refute the premises/axioms and there other ways to do that than needing to demonstrate inconsistency.
What does 'serverless' mean exactly?
1) i think server-less, means ops-less, no manager of server even at scale,maybe you need optimization query but not to deploy databases, migration and that.
3)Scale should not come at the cost of performance
is easier said than done, is the same idea automatic cache an thinks like this
2) i think the same
i will still use monolith like PostgreSQL use a doubt have more intensive workflows than medium.
Dude, calm down.

The letter is sent to employees, get impacted is explicit enough for the targeted audience.

Do not conflate perception gap and intended ambiguity.

No matter how through presented, message can get lost for anyone because of non-overlapping background in understanding. Neither the author nor the readers should feel negatively about that.
Whether or not you need it is tangential imo. People should be able to experience cool interactive visuals on websites without sacrificing their privacy
The phrase "your rapist's baby" is linguistically a bit like "the time traveler's wife": The wife is not a person; she is chattel belonging to the (male) time traveler. Likewise with this hypothetical baby: It has no identity of its own.

That we believe we can justly inflict capital punishment on a rapist's child is also interesting.

You know, there was once another Supreme Court case where individual rights (namely, property rights) came into conflict with (controversial) claims of personhood: Dred Scott.

You could say I'm trolling here, because the truth is I do not vote on the basis of abortion issues, and, when push comes to shove, I would tend to allow it. So I am not, politically, quite the person you might think I am.

Nevertheless, it does make me extremely, morally, uncomfortable; it's something I wouldn't want to be mixed up in; and I can absolutely understand the philosophical arguments against it. Which is why I am able to make analogies like those above.

If you stop and think about it, Republicans' opposition to abortion, perversely, demonstrates that at least in some areas they have moral principles (though you might disagree with them) -- that they do what they believe is right, even when it's not in their interest. Because the people most disproportionately impacted by restrictive abortion rules are women of color. If Republicans were ruthless consequentialists, this is exactly the person whose abortion rights they would not want to restrict. So in a perverse way it tells me that (some of them) actually believe something.
I totally agree with this too! Sometimes its nice to have a project that's meant to go nowhere, but it teaches you a ton and you get a lot of that yak shaving out of the way.

By the end you might have so little to show, but I found writing down what I learned a great way to "mark" the project with a healthy milestone :)
I understand where did you get the impression that Russia is waging a total war, but they only have 200K or so troops deployed in Ukraine
"another less in [sic] real-time virology"

A typo in the first sentence? In Science? Wow...
In addition to sounding like textbook embezzlement, I don't think there's any reason to believe that "theft" as define by that very broad Georgia definition couldn't apply here (the "unlawfully" is to exclude certain property appropriations explicitly permitted by law like bailiff seizures or deposit retentions from the definition, not to mean it's not theft if you keep someone's property against their will without breaking any other laws. I don't think it ceases to be "appropriation" of funds simply because you provide something worthless as an exchange either, particularly not with that last clause)
So his car takes roughly 300l to move 200m in SI units, or 45000l/100km.
By “the current religion” I mean the practices of lay people, not the buildings. Like not literally believing that kami exist, but doing hatsumode + Buddhist funerals.

The Christian-like wedding ceremonies are more recent than that I guess.
Probably? A priori there is nothing wrong with someone who owns a large amount of a certain asset transferring it into a liquidity pool in exchange for a different asset.

It gets more murky if a founder explicitly lies to investors in order to get them to buy their token. Fraudulent misrepresentation is problematic in most jurisdictions, but this has nothing to do with the mechanics of the "rugpull" itself.
Controlling content through lies and censorship are crude methods of population control. By selectively amplifying some truths and suppressing others, you can create context.
I follow the Analytics Engineering Roundup weekly email. It's published by dbt Labs but isn't overtly promotional.

https://roundup.getdbt.com/
Compared to other ICE cars? When a ford fiesta catches fire no one writes an article about it.
Binance promoted terra as ‘safe’ investment before $40bn collapse
I have a friend who's dad had what, at the time, seemed like the weirdest job.

He'd test the physical controls in Toyotas.

What "testing" meant was pretty broad. It might mean simple single control bench testing, to environmental testing (ie, mocking up a car interior, then exhaustively flipping switches and turning knobs in various atmospheric conditions, from freezing and dry to hot and humid, and all variations between), to epic road trips cross country, to epic off roading trips.

While it's true there are companies that offer "turn-key" components, the integration of all of these still requires a huge amount of testing.

I want REAL controls that never move, that can be used without having to take my eyes off the road, and that have tactile feedback when used. It seems clever to just move physical controls to software, like it's some sort of innovation, but for me, as the driver, I'll never buy a car again that does it the way Tesla does it.
Yes, but it's a blog.
Nice work!

Are you familiar with the procedurally generated worlds in Dwarf Fortress (they have some similarity to your project)?
just use when :p
Does the Register's measurement converter count?

https://www.theregister.com/Design/page/reg-standards-conver...
No, it's generally agreed upon in academia that ethics is an a priori science like math. I don't know about law but it sounds plausible.
Well, HN has many of these elements but is unique. Maybe a maverick? Also, bit unfair there is no exclamation after subscribe.
Why not just get your smallpox vaccination? Hint it's 35 swiss franks. ...when you visit Switzerland (in the tropical institute) ;)
This work was done by a team of people. This is commonly misattributed to a single person.
Kinzhal has been used multiple times according to western sources. Once against an underground weapons store where it's kinetic energy acted as a bunker buster. And a few other times against high level targets like foreign weapon stores and mercenaries.
Laser is probably good for defending high priority targets, especially from fast flying (including hypersonic) missiles and drones.

For defence against swarms of quadcopters with hand grenades, flying low through forests, cities or trenches, I think anti-drones are the only way.

Anti-drones can also intercept enemy drones over neutral or enemy territory, through valleys, or other places a laser cannot reach. Furthermore, while a mirrored surface can protect against lasers, it will not defend very well vs bullets.

Anti-drones can also double as drones (like fighter bombers), ie just have a manouverable drone that has some kind of forward-pointing gun in addition to whatever ordenance, spy camers, etc it might carry.
Love this! Are you using Simplex noise maps for altitude, temperature, and humidity? What's the process like?
> universities should guarantee the 12-month stipend

I'm not sure how this would work in practice.

If you hand out 12-month contracts, you'll lose a ton of students, because they often want the summer for themselves (in many cases, they are from another country and want to travel home, or they have a spouse working somewhere else in the country).

If you give the students the option on an annual basis, a school like Columbia might have the money to cover unanticipated expenses, but mine does not.

> rather than making summer stipend dependent on availability of advisor funding or student jobs (like TAing)

The money has to come from somewhere.
Why should a state decide what is a felony?

Shouldn't the restriction of federal rights be limited to federal law? i.e. the right to bear arms, the right to vote.
If you understand the people you disagree with, you might find yourself changing your mind and agreeing with them, if only on one or two points. This is how I went from being a half-assed Randroid to a half-assed libertarian socialist. I wasn't willing to take Ayn Rand's word about socialism and anarchism as gospel -- or that of her anointed prophet Leonard Peikoff.

As for Roe v. Wade, I think the problem with reading the 14th Amendment as protecting a right to privacy is that the 14th isn't enough. We should be invoking the 9th Amendment as well, which explicitly covers unenumerated rights.

> The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

This amendment exists specifically to counter the sort of mindset that thinks that rights come from God or the government, and that the Constitution wasn't written to enumerate and thus limit the powers of the Federal government.
Indeed. It would have been nice if he had named the actual causes of the problems though. Inflation did not take off with the war in Ukraine, that's a red herring. Klarnauts are losing their jobs because of the knock-on effects of lockdowns, other COVID counter-measures and the massive quantity of money printing required to keep things going during that process. Printing so much money inevitably creates inflation. However it seems the CEO is too chicken to spell it out and prefers to point the finger of blame elsewhere.
The ever so clumsy phrase "printed cash" is the grump-signaling I'm here for.
A PhD especially in a technical field gives broad insight to problem solving full stop, or at least someone without severe self-esteem issues should consider that is the bar they've cleared. I have a PhD and wormed myself into tons of low positions, doesn't anyone else want to know how the sausage actually gets made?
honestly DARPA would do better to just buy or license the Lun-class ekranoplan designs. The Lun makes the Boeing Pelican look like a grift. Lun is a far more capable and fully developed offering.
>This website has no identity other than an emoji

Assuming you mean the little running guy composed of unicode characters (and the bear face in the link at the bottom), the actual term is kaomoji. Emoji are specifically little images.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emoticon#Japanese_(kaomoji)

http://kaomoji.ru/en/
You're making huge assumptions here. One is the reliability of anti-AWACs AAMs, while ignoring both kill-chain issues and ECM etc. Sure the Russian AF might be able to use them during a "bolt out of the blue" attack, but once hostilities have commenced, any airbase that hosts MIG-31BMs will be targeted heavily.
The extreme positions are "a four-cell zygote should be protected from abortion", and "a baby being born may be aborted". Most citizens are in the middle ground.
Oh really? Would you like to provide an example of this?
> Things will break in unexpected ways

Like the webgl max texture size dropping to 2048. I wish they'd give that one a bump.
> The actual Jewish tradition is against several of those

I think that Josephus, the first-century Jewish historian, would have something to say[0] about that:

“The law, moreover, enjoins us to bring up all our offspring and forbids women to cause abortion of what is begotten, or to destroy it afterward; and if any woman appears to have so done, she will be a murderer of her child, by destroying a living creature, and diminishing humankind,” (Josephus, Against Apion Book 2, Chapter 25, Section 202).

> And Protestants weren’t against abortion until recently, because they defined themselves as against Catholicism.

That's like saying that Protestants didn't believe in God until recently, because they defined themselves as against Catholics who are theists. Do you have any example of historic Protestant teaching that approved of abortion?

[0] https://carm.org/abortion/abortion-and-the-early-church/
I’m interested to know if there’s a term for this phenomenon. I too find myself frequently engaging “against” my own side, out of a sincere desire to strengthen it and a sensitivity to how its weaker arguments reflect poorly on me.
Serious question: Do you think no people have been harmed by crypto? My guess is by the end, 10s of thousands of people will have been seriously financially harmed.
I have not heard of a "laser" based system. I know of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_landing_system but maybe that's legacy now?
You know followers of "religion" invented empiricism (and logic and rhetoric, etc.), right?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Bacon
This is true, but that doesn’t mean you have to do it. If you keep looking at your neighbor in order to determine your next step, you will be disappointed in every walk of life, not only in academia. If you don’t subscribe to the same ideas, do it differently, and get ready for some resistance. In academia you have to carve your path just like everywhere else. That said: I agree that academia is just a big circle jerk. :)
The smallpox vaccine is no joke, and cause actually hurt people with fairly common skin conditions like eczema:

https://www.aad.org/public/diseases/eczema/childhood/health-...

When my unit was vaccinated before Iraq the docs were concerned for me. I had to take precautions.
correction: all the boomers are probably immune.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16804475/
Honesty Is a Professional Behavior
wasn't this debuked several times?
> [2] lets you look at country per capita spending on tertiary education

The link shows government spending per student as a percentage of GDP per capita, rather than overall government spending per capita. This figure can get distorted when there are more students in the system for any reason (such as due to private investment).

> since those places tend to make it harder to go to college, since taxpayer pressure on cost reduces opportunity.

This does not follow. Rather, having more students decreases the per-student government expenditure figure, even as the burden on the taxpayer stays the same.

As a percentage of GDP, US government expenditure on tertiary education is roughly in the middle of what various countries in Europe spend.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/707557/higher-education-...
I think you're conflating the philosophy of mathematics with describing the entirety of philosophy (or even just morality) using mathematics.

I cannot claim to understand philosophy but I can claim to understand law, and it is _not_ like mathematics. Human discretion is paramount to the system, and laws are written in such a way that humans reinterpret them afterwards, as influenced by their own cultural and social bias. How is this like mathematics? Do you need a jury to decide if a theorem is true?

I have met many engineers who treat law as if it is supposed to be exact and mathematical. They become very annoyed when it does not conform to this view, or when laws aren't written in an even more detailed, step-by-step breakdown. That is not how it works. There's a reason there's discretion in the system, if you try to regulate something as inherently chaotic as human behaviour with inflexible rules, you get crypto.
My example is relevant to tagging in branches that may merge back into the main one. The stable branches in Linux are cherry-pick branches that don't get merged back and therefore creating tags there is harmless.
Guidepost Investigation of the Southern Baptist Convention
Only the Catholics are consistent here, and only some of them.
They were holding $17m in funds and only paid 2 unnamed security auditors?

Yes, getting a proper audit for a Defi Protocol is expensive (probably 8 person weeks at $20-30k/week or ~$200k), and every good audit firm has a 3-6 month waiting period. But when you’ve got 100x that to lose, it’s a drop in the bucket.
It’s fairly common to believe you shouldn’t kill people but have no responsibility to keep them alive.

Actually, believing they’re the same thing is more like EA utilitarianism, isn’t it? Almost noone has that philosophy and most would find it repulsive.
In other words, "code is law" only if it complies within the existing framework of our laws. IMO, this still leaves a lot of room for creative applications of smart contracts.
The score in a video game is like the sum of edge costs in a path within a graph. A "morality" is the entirety of the graph, the whole system. So it's apples to oranges.