skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Admittedly I just skimmed the article but I feel like the title should be more - "This "amateur" medical...". His primary expertise is more physics/CS/programmer related than it is human biology/medicine.
Thats why breaking the peg is so bad. Its a visious cycle so both are correct.
When someone infantilizes or shames people for their suffering, yes.
'Amateur' oughtn't be scare-quoted because it's not a slur, many of the finest programmers were amateurs for many years before they were old enough to be given a job in the profession.
Shopify is looking to force more developers into their 20% cut to squeeze more revenue out of their existing partners since the business isn't growing fast enough on the seller side. On top of the obvious issues with the 20% cut, other platforms like BigCommerce have copied Shopify's model. So now I need to pay out 40% to support both? This falls apart quickly if you support more than 1 shopping cart platform.

I suspect that the major players negotiate exceptions. I don't for a second believe that the large companies you see on the Shopify App Store pay their 20% cut. They would never agree to that.

I do agree that this will lead to a regression and force app developers into using Private/Custom apps, making for a worse and less secure experience for Shopify customers.
Would be Iron man or Spiderman, recent and popular across the world.
> now supports kernel live patching

Never heard of this before. Looks like it's called kpatch: https://github.com/dynup/kpatch
Probably commenting on local transit networks being generally at capacity during rush hour, which this would not improve.

For example, in Munich, there is a ~10% cheaper version of the monthly ticket that is only valid after 9 AM. This kind of incentive shaping falls flat.

(That is not to say I object to the new ticket, to be clear.)
There's a similar project for the Acorn BBC Micro called PiTubeDirect, which allows the Pi to emulate several different CPUs, while connected to the BBC Micro's "tube" second processor slot.

https://github.com/hoglet67/PiTubeDirect

(The BBC Micro itself was quite remarkable for supporting multiple processors, which did not have to be the same architecture as the host 6502. Amazing for 1981.)
I'm not sure it's scientific or helpful to include the risk that a program develops "beliefs" or "opinions", and terminating the program is "wiping [someone] out"
> Pretty sure it's just Germany being pig-headed about it for some reason.

That pig-headed reason being that Germany went trough two different repressive regime during the last century.

Regimes that made plenty of use of large scale surveillance and data collections [0] to find a lot of their victims.

That's why cash still reigns supreme in Germany; It's anonymous and third parties can't just remotely disable it by disabling your bank account.

It's also the reason why Germans value their privacy, at least used to.

[0] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosa_Liste
for 3 months*
The notion that RH kernels are stable is patently false.
RH constantly backports features to "stable" kernels, and it does cause problems.

I was on the forefront of this when they were backporting container tech to their 2.6.32 kernel.

I've also seen them break userspace repeatedly with kernel changes for selinux within a stable kernel.

But as you say, you can pay for support so you have someone to scream at when things go south.

When it comes to ABI stability, I'd trust the vanilla kernels more than RHEL.
Yup - this is it. Society doesn't learn. It's not the same people. Look at banking/finance - over and over again we have similar crazy things happen, often about 20-30 years apart. The people who learned from the last one retired...
I had a lot of respect for Musk but at this point it's clear he's a con artist with a lot of luck and chutzpah (and money?)

It's really disappointing. If he were... 30% more honest and less of a dirtbag, he could truly be one of the most inspiring individuals on the planet. His portfolio of projects is incredible. He didn't build them himself, of course, but it's inspiring to see someone so interested in space, electric vehicles, and neuroprosthetics.

But he's such a dirtbag.

Oh well.
This is a sort-deep link to one page of the site and the main page of the site explains the overall project to design and build one's own XT-clone. Kind of ambitious.

So start with a Pi running around 1/30th normal speed, then get the memory card working and remove that from the pi, then get the video and BIOS support working and remove that from the pi, eventually remove the last thing from the pi and crank the speed up about 30-times faster and you've got a gradually bootstrapped fully operational XT-clone.

Its an interesting project plan, usually people bring up a system by having just CPU and memory at least partially working, then add peripherals like disk, display, rs232, GPIO, etc. But this way you can bring it all up, at least enough to run CP/M (err, ms-dos I guess?), admittedly glacially slowly and mostly emulated, and then upgrade the parts to hardware as see fit.

Could probably do something with a FPGA that would be much more difficult but could at least run full speed (or maybe faster?). Of course in early 2022 what's more unobtanium, RasPis or FPGAs? If you can't buy either I guess it doesn't matter.
It could be argued that Buffet already has such power, as there are all kinds of weirdness around the police forces belonging to the railroad industry in which he is heavily invested through BNSF. I've never heard of him abusing this power but the potential certainly is there.
As I said:

> That doesn't mean we paralyze ourselves with inaction or always prioritize marginal improvements to safety (even others' safety) over all other concerns.

Frankly I don't care if a (private) road owner wants to require specific safety equipment on the vehicles allowed on their roads. Their property, their rules. Other potential users of the roads can then decide whether they're willing to accept the residual risk. But that argument depends heavily on those who are being excluded (for lack of required safety equipment or low risk tolerance) not being forced to pay for those roads' construction and upkeep. It doesn't work for a government mandating systems to be installed on all vehicles, or for tax-funded roads.
> These forfeiture trials are criminal trials.

These forfeiture trials are not criminal trials. There are plenty of ways you can be civilly liable without breach of contract.

I do think the standard should be higher than a typical civil case (beyond preponderance of the evidence).

But this artifact of law has a reason to exist: if there's stuff that's most likely involved in a crime with no identifiable owner, it makes sense for it to be seized. Especially the original case of distant and difficult to identify ship owners. (Once an owner can be identified, I do think there should be greater protections-- deriving from the fourth, not the sixth, amendment.
There is still a lot taken on faith for quite awhile, as the knowledge to judge the accuracy/meaning of each of those is also built on a lot of theories and prior experiments which are not usually personally tested. But Physics as noted is much less so than most everything else.
Cassandra was a Trojan priestess of Apollo in Greek mythology cursed to utter true prophecies, but never to be believed

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassandra

https://www.google.com/search?q=books+about+cassandra+of+tro...
> sophisticated

aka obfuscated

does the yield come from anywhere other than funds deposited by new users?
"This person didn't do a great job of accounting for inflation"

Listen to yourself. This is like saying "we have a perfect earthquake prediction model, except it doesn't predict certain types of earthquakes"

This comment along with the massive down-votes that my posts have received proves that a majority of HN is absolutely clueless about running businesses and I'm glad for that
> In short, it is to let the AI help you "look at the film", and the accuracy rate is almost comparable to professional doctors, and it is completely free.

In the US, the issue is getting the Xray
This is a regulated industry. If you don't jump through the necessary hoops, the US government will shut you down and there are many laws on the books they can use for this. There are many laws beyond HIPAA (which exists to make it easier to share data, not harder) which apply.
Seeing this makes me sad. My 11-year-old was equally excited.
You didnt formulate a question.

Would you like details and a history lesson on how vile cheney and all his PNAC buds have been?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keating_Five

https://www.upi.com/Archives/1991/10/22/FBI-knew-BCCI-financ...

Guess which Khoshoggi's dad was involved...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jamal_Khashoggi

and who did donald trump buy his yacht from

Adnan... "the worlds largest Arms trader"

https://youtu.be/yuWMH5TD5bE

yeah, it gets super weird after that...
Nice job creating fun little project .

Made me laugh, so mission accomplished!
The idea behind it is to keep the idiots commuting just to sit down in the wage cage 9000. It’s for three months only btw and just a trick to improve acceptance of the new German Poverty caused by very bad political decisions.
I think if you don't think we'll have the same thing on Mars as we do on Earth, then I have some NFTs to sell you.
Sure, but my guess is that YouTube is earning more than that in advertising from you, even sans music and oroginals.
I listen to music and imagine past scenes in my life/future scenarios.
Considering I did neither of those things, your behavior remains unexplained...
> Do not use instrumenting profilers for measuring code.

except when that is useful 8-)
With treasuries paying 1.6% x $50B, that’s $66M per month of interest.
It would be surprising if it was effective and had absolutely 0 side effects.
>This is true for every pile of toxic crap that's ever been financially engineered.

I have a radical idea that I'm fairly sure would get me killed if I ever stood a chance of implementing it: A complete ban on all non-productive financial schemes. We have an entire parasite class that grown unfathomably wealthy while providing no real value to the rest of society.

The "futures trader" extracting value from the system buying/selling futures has done no "real" work, their profit comes exclusively from making others pay more. The financial world is full of middle-men parasites like this.

They love to use the "making the market more efficient" and "price discovery" BS, but I believe they know what they're doing is solely about enriching themselves.
that's literally what pharma is now- companies that exist to help smaller groups get their research through the clinical and approval process. It would be hard to buidl that level of expertise in a smaller company.
I am not clear why a person that lives in India should care about Stanford, when the cost of tutoring 1 person in Stanford can educate 10 people in India.

Especially when it is already so well-funded.

Stanford disproprotinately benefits very elite of an already wealthy nation. That's okay, but purl-clutching like they need every penny is kinda gross.
If u used to be a paid software programmer and got a different job, but continued doing programming side projects without pay, are u an amateur or not?
Which country is this? I would love to have commute as part of work in my country. Fom the point of law employees materialize at work in the morning and than teleports to home in the evening (the creator of work code here must have been fan of star trek).
I believe this kind of change in workers law would motivate employers to implement more sane WFH policies.
Not a 'happy ending' for Elon Musk, again. Alas.
It's 9€ per month and the ticket will be available for 3 months.
If you don't care about music much, but are into synths and sounds check Ignacio (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEnC4kLujgo) or Spiral for something lighter (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VV1lWVhMCk)
The "defendant" arg is passed by value and can't be null.

The hack they came up with is to just disable type checking and pass in whatever object they have available.

TFA describes the inevitable runtime errors
Could there be any merit training this on a common-sense dataset such as Cyc?

https://www.lesswrong.com/tag/cyc
Wordle Hack
On the other hand DAI fluctuates between 0.999 and 1.001 all the time. Is it not "stable".

I am no fan of tether, but small fluctuations like this have always been normal for "stable coins".
This is very cool work. I'm a radiologist, I also work on developing ML/AI based systems for cancer detection and characterization. Literally just took a break for a few minutes from creating some labels and saw this as the top HN post!

I think in some ways making the model available online can be good, but in other ways could be harmful too. Very complicated topic.

恭喜coolwulf， 祝你继续成功。
# CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK is not set

CONFIG_LSM="lockdown,yama,integrity,selinux,bpf"

on kernel 5.14.0-70.13.1.el9_0.aarch64

So not on ARM at least
Yes, this and when I was younger and played a lot of live music. Best times of my life.
So, they have to spend an inordinate amount of effort constraining the free flow of information, to make money off that information, so that they can ensure the free flow of information into the next millennium?

That doesn't seem that great.
That ticket is not equivalent. That ticket is only for Deutsche Bahn and similar.

OTOH, the 9-Euro-Ticket is for all (!) local transport (incl. bus, ferry, ...) and regional trains. That means here in Hamburg I can use all bus, underground train and ferry connections. It's also all month, 24hours/day.
The Constitutionality of Civil Forfeiture (2016)
Engineers love buffers though, and building fault-tolerant systems.
We had an international financial crisis over it. That seems less than fine.
I just don't think they really figured out as a major priority the enterprise side of business delivery (training and more). Interestingly in business it's not London that is sometimes seen as their connection but maybe South African (it's the name with ubuntu or some background in founder).

Do you buy Red Hat Enterprise Linux? Or Ubuntu? Just based on the name I think RHEL as an advantage personally.
I agree that it might not be historical accurate, but it became the standard narrative of modern japanese. So it actually helps you to understand modern japan instead of the era it describes.
Starting with references to a Daily Mail interview and a podcast (even if from a purportedly reputable source) doesn't exactly fill me with confidence.

The Daily Mail is gutter-level tabloid trash. If anything, it's a pretty strong anti-reference.
Technically an SFU doesn't need it. But clients connecting to the SFU will probably need it.

Also having a TURN server allows for very restricted corporate scenarios, such as everybody connecting through a single, well known port (as Sean's S.O. reply mentions in the sibling comment).

For example in OpenVidu (not trying to plug it here so won't put a link) a Coturn server is deployed, and TURN credentials are automatically shared with all clients (web browsers, mobile phones) so they can access the SFU through the Coturn instance, if needed. People are using this on very restricted networking setups for allowing connections between differently segmented networks, some of them not even connected to the internet.
I would hope people feel empowered to go to the authorities or media, but all too often sex workers are heavily discriminated against. Sometimes going to the police can get them in trouble, going to the media may bring unnecessary attention to them and their family.

I agree with the other comment about how we need legislation to ensure proper channels on how to get account access back or services. Far too often if you dare question say Google or Facebook your account may be banned for life with little retribution on your end.

That's why these platforms need to be broken up or follow standards that could allow people to take their social graphs/data and go to other competitors.
Repeat after me: All AI's are guilty until proven innocent.

I've been saying this (and getting downvoted) for years: AI is a tool. It is no different from any other tool in that the person using it is responsible for whatever it does. If something happens when an AI is involved, it should be presumed to be at fault. And thus the user of the AI is also presumed to be at fault.

This comes into play specifically with the "child in the middle of the road" scenario. At some point our vehicles will become good enough to make actual life and death decisions. Does it swerve into a tree, into oncoming traffic, or take out the child? The only moral, ethical and practical answer is: An AI should choose to harm its user rather than anyone else, because there can never be 100% certainty that the AI did not make a mistake.

You choose to use Tesla autopilot and it kills someone? You are responsible. Period. Feel free to sue Tesla for selling you a faulty tool, but you're still culpable for it's use.
Why should it be illegal to misquote someone who is dead? That doesn't make a lot of intuitive sense to me.

As Abraham Lincoln once said:

"Don't believe everything you read on the Internet just because there's a picture with a quote next to it."

Uh oh, time to throw me in jail, right!?

I realize that misinformation can be a powerfully bad thing in this world, but I think there must be better ways to deal with it than turning a dead person's image into a lucrative capitalist enterprise.

Apple gets to use Einstein's image to advertise their products because they could afford to pay the $600,000 fee, but I can't use Einstein's image to promote my business because, sorry, I'm not a worthy enough capitalist.

> The money is going to a Top University.

Oh, that makes it all better! Top Universities (TM) have the unique ability to avoid all issues monetary related to corruption prevalent in other institutions. (/s)

I'm going to guess that this money is going to be spent on things like academics, perhaps the next Einstein will earn $9 million per year to perform groundbreaking research!

https://stanforddaily.com/2022/02/06/congressional-probe-int...
Yep, this is correct.
What's the angle? Who is profiting from this venture?
How much?

(And pro-tip re linked post: ideas carry better without cryptoracist prose.)
The post started off with a seemingly reasonable yet obviously naïve example of flaws in the process, then goes on a rant where it reframes every tweet by the FDA in a gross mischaracterization.

The funniest thing here is that there would be very few people in the world that would count any international trade as a part of the "free market". So any restriction placed by the US government on importing any products would implicitly not have any effect on the "free market" that most people refer to, and most people that would drool over the "free market" would also be the same people to decry any movement towards globalism.

But even then, why wouldn't these European manufacturer just print a second set of labels for selling their product to the US, if it's just a "labeling requirement"? Sounds like a very fishy claim.
I'll take that bet. But you need to put up the $5,000 first.

So you don't think you're just losing money, I'll issue you $5,000 worth of my personal stablecoin that you can redeem 1:1.

If you win, I'll give you another $5,000 of my personal stablecoin to pay the bet.

You can redeem them whenever you want, I'll be good for it. /s
For the same reason workers do sub-minimum wage jobs or work in unsafe conditions: because of economic duress. Additionally, keeping it illegal helps society as a whole prevent vulnerable people from being coerced or manipulated into such work.

People have these libertarian notions of rational people making enlightened decisions to do sex work, but for the most part the women (and men) ensnared into such work have various vulnerabilities that predators in the industry manipulate. They are typically young (remember, humans don't have fully developed rational faculties until they're 25: https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/encyclopedia/content.aspx?Con...). They may have been abused, etc. Society needs to be able to protect vulnerable people, sometimes from their own decisions.
ELI5, please.
Great job! Nice simple and clear idea and reasonable pricing.

Bookmarked for future use
Never? Of course not. But they do a much better job. I don't know the current stats, but I recall hearing something like 70% of china's ruling party have engineering degrees. Whereas the overwhelming majority of ours are lawyers.

I think that plays a part in why China's infrastructure is so good, and why they've been kicking our ass the last 30 years in terms of growth.
The words “found malicious mass”, disclaimer or not, could be considered a diagnosis. You can probably say “anomaly”, or maybe even “classified as malicious mass”. With you having connections in the US, it is probably worth talking to an expert if you want to keep this online.

Also, 50 GPUs seems like more than necessary!
It literally means "for the love".
> Critics of the CFAA often point to the death of Aaron Swartz, who died by suicide in 2013 after federal prosecutors charged him under the computer-fraud law for downloading millions of research papers. Two earlier attempts at legislative reform, known as Aaron's Law, never made it out of Congress. And it's worth noting that the updated policy is not a legislative fix to the problem.

Well, that's a bummer. But at least "good faith" research is okay now, right?

> Under the new policy, the Justice Department says it won't prosecute researchers for accessing computer systems "without authorization" unless:

>• The defendant was not authorized to access the protected computer under any circumstances by any person or entity with the authority to grant such authorization;

>• The defendant knew of the facts that made the defendant's access without authorization; and

>• Prosecution would serve the Department's goals for CFAA enforcement.

Unless I'm reading that wrong, this summarizes to "No investigation without Authorization", with a side helping of selective prosecution for good measure.

How can this be characterized as allowing "good faith" security research efforts?
> Devs code better products if they enjoy using the tools.

Is there any evidence for that claim?
Terra Luna offered some great DeFi yield opportunities.

Unrealistic yield is one of the hallmarks of a ponzi scheme. The DeFi yield opportunities require more money to flow in than to flow out.

Apple stock, for example, pays a dividend that is not dependent on more people buying Apple stock but on the company profits for the next quarter.
Grifters gonna grift.
He'd better stop that thing, it's almost as big as a CVS receipt.
Peeking at the long term chart[1], I don't think 0.1% is notable. In Oct 2018, it bounced around ~1% under the peg for most of 2 months. Then in Dec 2018, it bounced around 1-2% over the peg for 2 months. A similar swing happened in Apr-Jun 2017. I'm actually surprised, I've never looked at this chart before and I didn't expect to see swings of several percentage points. But at any rate the current 0.1% is pretty tame in comparison and I'm sure it's just the cost of moving money to arbitrage.

[1]: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/tether/
To be clear- he isn't just a "blogger about psychiatry", he is a licensed, practicing psychiatrist with an MD.
Countless hours of El Greco on loop during gaming sessions (Wolfenstein, Doom, Quake and similar) (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gSXzPd8RX0Q)