skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> You can't just make decisions based on expected value of the bet, because when you run out of money, you can't play anymore.

Yes, variance can be a bitch, but that goes back to my original point, if you can't afford to go all in on a flip with a pocket pair vs a range that's most likely to be 2 overcards (i.e. TT+), where you should have at least 55% equity in a heads up scenario, you can't afford to sit at that table.

This isn't as relevant for recreational players, but for this exact reason professional poker players should have a bankroll of _at least_ 200 max buy ins for a cash game, and even more for tournaments.

Even pocket aces will lose at least 18% of the time when going all in pre-flop in a heads up scenario (more multi way). If you can't afford to take that chance, you playing at the wrong table. Of course, most people would be willing to take these 80/20 odds even with money they can't afford to lose, but that's a whole different scenario.
Quite interesting, would linux running on quemu give a better experience than asahi linux ?
Does Matrix have a money feature (excuse my ignorance), which can be controlled by bots?
SAS has a mainframe spreadsheet module.
I've been taught at my uni to use dd...
Fun fact: dd outputs its progress when it receives a USR1 signal via kill too.
As others said it's a music player, it can also play radio streams and podcasts but that requires plugin.
You could apply for jobs in businesses that are not affected by economic vagaries, or government jobs, or jobs at counter-cyclical businesses like debt collection.
Not sure about yours, my my emoji is crying
I wrote such a tool on A500 called "Aspro" with visual memory scanning so one could spot bitmaps and adjust step, save/load files, 68K disassembler and other things I can't remember. It could be invoked with hotkeys during games or demos. Too bad I lost it. Fun times.
We all do. Well probably not Rob Pike
This is a common thing around the world today, just look at Argentina and Sri Lanka. There are two rates, the bank rate and the market rate. Nothing new, and nothing unique to "Soviet" occupation, it is still a very serious issue in unstable markets.
Which is a shame.

I have fond memories of visiting my grandparents in Florida and going to their backyard to pick oranges and grapefruits to make fresh juice in the morning.

It’s unfortunate the orange lobby can ban something that just seems so Florida to me.
Quaternions like monads, do not exist in the circles most people I know live in. Fresnel lenses however do: almost every traffic light uses one.
Afaik it allows setting the animation duration, which should help a bit
Can you explain what "subsidize" means then? Because that's pretty clearly what it reads like to me.
I was talking about a common argument that used to exist in Android developer circles in its early days of existence.

As for the users, if we go down that path, they don't even care about Linux kernel, AOSP, Project Treble, or whatever.

That happened because of Google, the continuous adoption failure of FOSS phones since OpenMoko proves that enthusiasts aren't enough to sustain a business at scale.
Until I drank ij wit beer, I didn't get Dutch "ij"
Most wide-public guidelines are unhealthy and unscientific simply because they are the results of some lobbyist pushing some product. If we go through recent history a thing that's really difficult these days [1] we'll see many examples, let's say for foods:

- blue fish are the protein of the sea, eat many! Few years later blue fish are the pollutant-eaters of the sea, avoid them!

- cigarettes are good for health! They kill seasonal germs! Smoke! Few years later cigarettes should be banned they are absolutely unhealthy!

- artificial tanning is safe for skin than Sun exposure! Than artificial tanning provoke skin cancer!

- radioactivity at small doses are good for health, help fetus to develop stronger, help against baldness! Radioactivity is dangerous and lethal!

....

The REAL issue is that to avoid such phenomenon we need a PUBLIC-only really developed and religiously separate from the private sector public research for the society, with public bodies who publish their results for any cohort of citizens (witch means from real papers to abstracts for the large public) and of course the little we have had, when real innovation have happened, was destroyed quickly cannibalizing their results for private profits. Just see the outcome for IT or from big pharma. Oh BTW such move it's the key for the win of China and Russia, since both still have public research while we haven't anymore.

[1] YES, my dears fellow HNers we do have hyper-fast and hyper-big search engines BUT we have nothing public really good at finding really past events we do not know by some keywords, just try to generate let's say a map of how many floods per area we have experienced in recent years: IF someone have published that we can profit from such results, if not building out of the web it's far from easier. When someone do something similar for very specific aspects likely end up here on HN like the recent Reddit Map or some Babarasi network analyses etc because there is no public generic tool for such research
SSD-Based Vector Indices
Imo, the correct rule is "copy if it is more likely to be modified separately" and "create one method if it likely has to change at the same time".
I don't know anyone using Paypal for this scenario. However, people do use Wise and Revolut.
I agree it’s risky business, but that is what happened in the 70ties. So it is possible to let inflation eat say half of the US national debt. That’s 13 trillion USD…

Even if the US economy shrinks by 5% in the process it may still be beneficial for many. This is the extraordinary economic incentive I was referring to above.
The compelling value proposition is users trust Apple a shitload more than random startups and have enough apple user friends to make it work.

The sad part is that these apps are needed at all. In Australia the government just regulated that all banks must support free and instant money transfers and that email addresses and phone numbers be supported as addresses to send to.

So if your friend wants to send you money, you type their email on any bank app and it pops up with their legal name confirming you have the right person. The money shows up instantly.
It's not just automotive. It's everywhere. E.g. power supplies are apparently a big deal right now... And sure, you can't easily re-design, re-qualify, re-tool for something very different than what is in your design. Companies do that typically for EOL'd components but they usually have a bit more of a heads up and opportunity to buy some extra of those to buffer their redesigns.
> And the whole game has been reverse engineered by charlatans to dump crap into rivers of blind money. If think capital offerings aren’t designed explicitly to target index inclusion criteria then you aren’t in on the joke.

This is an interesting and plausible take, just wondering if you have actual published resources on that or is it your personal, arguably justified hunch?
This bizarre set of tools is like the cookie wall solution. Make the solution so unusable for the end user but technically/legally correct (well, not sure actually) that you "comply" while also attempting to show how ridiculous the requirement is.
"Because the correct pronunciation is used in my field I learned to pronounce it correctly" effect.

About 250,000 people work in media-arts in the UK out of 24 million full time workers: you are the 1% here!
> Strategists say the rally isn’t credible as many currency-trading shops have stopped dealing in the ruble on the grounds that its value seen on monitors is not the price it can be traded at in the real world.

This means "fraudulent" as in, "Russia is manipulating its own currency's value."

There is a difference between fraudulent pricing and changing pricing, I agree. This is fraudulent pricing, however.
And then there're different breads. Northern/east? style rye bread vs south/west? wheat. Both are different how well they stay for longer time and how you can mess them up.
So I looked into them because of your comment, and they have a very big drawback of taking a very long time to heat the water. That wouldn't work for me, our water usage tends to be very "peaky" - my system can heat the water almost as fast as you can use it in a shower.

Maybe with a very complicated system with an extra large storage tank, and perhaps integrated with the home heat (so a single heat pump). I feel like the tech isn't quite ready yet, and I don't like being a pioneer.

It seems like a no brainier if you heat with electricity, but not quite ready yet for those who heat with natural gas. Right now it seems better suited for southern climates.
It's sad to hear that Fox's is leaving Berkeley. I've heard only wonderful things about her from her course staff and students. It's awful that the university cannot pay its talented faculty enough to keep them from leaving for financial reasons and worse that they can't muster a healthy academic culture that respects all their faculty equally, whether they're tenure track, adjunct, or tenured. Best of luck in industry, it's probably the right move but I'm sure you will be dearly missed!
Why not just SSH into a significantly more capable machine and enjoy two days between battery charges instead?

(AMD just got done with their 5nm Zen 4 Computex keynote right now)

https://www.anandtech.com/show/17399/amd-ryzen-7000-announce...
Up to 60%. In average 25% on pyperformance which is another benchmark. See the faster cpython work, it's not a JIT but plenty of other easier optimizations
It says you just wave your hand over the scanner, so, even if it is a vein scan, LE could probably start putting similar cameras up to scan passers by without their knowledge. (This would obviously also work for facial recognition, but with existing cameras.)

A 1/1,000,000 chance of falsely matching a face is a non-issue for payment validation. For a law enforcement search, it means the computer will auto-fabricate local suspects.

Prosecutors in the US are judged on conviction rates. They have no incentive to worry about bogus matches. (And the ones that don't let such things slow them down tend to be promoted.)
Sure, if that’s the use case. But I think the point of this thread is that in many cases we add functionality despite the lack of immediate necessity, and this causes problems.
AMD Computex 2022 keynote with announcement: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRtBB2VnF8M&t=145s
But ultimately the indices are incentivized by the underlying companies' growth, as to make their customers happy, thus it is in their best interest to take sane votes?
If you're helming a small boat in heavy weather at night having a lighthouse to steer to is significantly better than even a dedicated plotter mounted in sight of the helm, let alone a phone you have to hold.

Some harbour/river entrances have a sectored light. White if you're sailing in safe water, red if you're to the left of it, green if you're to the right. Makes a fantastic navigation aid for the entrance and I'll take a setup like that over a plotter for pilotage any day.
I upgrade every couple of years to the best hardware on the market, but even for me PCIe 5 is just “nice to have”. No GPUs support it yet and rumors suggest that RTX40 will also be PCIe 4.
AirBnB was doing it in 2013 (or earlier): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31459699
It makes sense (in retrospect; I am certainly not an analyst who predicted this beforehand).

Right now, it is more or less impossible for any Russian to a) use the dollar to buy anything from outside Russia, and b) travel outside Russia to buy anything in the first place. That greatly reduces the demand for exchanging rubles for dollars.

This is true, whether via official or unofficial means. Consider Argentina, a country that for years has had its own serious economic issues. A huge skew between the official and black-market exchange rate for hard currency, such as in Argentina (the "dolar azul"), exists because a) there are capital controls but b) it's still possible to use those dollars/Euro/Swiss franc/whatever. Argentineans are free to use the US dollar to buy things, both inside and outside Argentina. This is not true for Russians.
It seems to be Apple's vehicle for making p2p payments, particularly through messages.

It's also a virtual debit card, so you can spend or transfer the money, but it seems the its raison d'être is p2p payments.
Perhaps.

Probably not.
The nightmare of getting Doom running on Aix
> Bonds will be wrecked

Why? Also, isn't it in contrast with:

> it's actually a really good deal to buy bonds when they yield north of 10% (if we get there).
>> But it really seems like there's a glut of tech companies with investment capital paying people 300k to make apps for stuff that's trivial.

I work for one of the largest health care companies in the world. In the US, there are only three or four major health care companies and they're all massive. My company has repeatedly said its too big to move as fast as smaller startups who are coming in and disrupting one niche of the entire market.

For example, we have something like 4-5 different billing systems, none of which are able to talk to each other. They're monolithic, they're 10 years past what you would consider "legacy" software. So in comes all these companies building billing apps for health care companies. My company? We can't compete, so we're constantly buying other companies, and integrating their tech into our company.

Today in Health Care, startups with good ideas and good products? They're not lasting and are being bought up at a record pace. My company? Bought 15 companies last quarter, we're on pace to buy more this quarter. So instead of creating and building this tech in-house? They're just buying up these smaller startups and using their technology instead.

My advice? Build a decent product/app/platform for a niche area in Health Care and you'd be surprised how fast one of these companies will be knocking on your door.
This was the exact vibe that I got from it, but couldn’t place it. Thank you.
dd is pretty old software. I just meant it entered the mainstream consciousness of self-techs (non-pros) and pirates simultaneously ~2004-2007.
He is right. Search engines are seriously borked in this regard.

The real solution to his problem is to select a given vendor of laser printers, then go to their site and look at their large-format stuff.

Myself, I've had good experiences with large format Ricoh printers.

But Adam could also tweak his existing printer by using different print settings, like selecting "card stock" as what he is claiming to be printing on.
> This means that anyone who's in a country that has blocked GitHub or where GitHub has been blocked due to sanctions is unable to participate in the Rust ecosystem. Or maybe your account has been blocked due to sanctions? Boom, all your work gone. You can't access your account now.

Is there reason to believe that if crates.io were self-hosted, it wouldn't be subject to the same laws? Or is the theory that Microsoft/GitHub is covered by sanctions rules that a not-for-profit might not be?
Are you talking about type erasure and generics? If so I agree, but that’s unrelated to devirtualization
There's probably going to need to be some regulations.

But EV batteries are much less spread out than cigarette butts. The waste is generated in predictable places like mechanics shops, and doesn't involve casual consumer decisions like whether to litter or recycle a pop bottle.
I was searching for something same, as we will be beginning our fundraise and as everyone is saying market is tough. But this is something amazing.

Thank you so much for curating this.
> There was plenty of evidence for this in the late 80s, from cruise missiles to the space shuttle and many other systems. It's just that 80s arguments didn't have the benefit of the internet and the web in everyone's pocket.

I would agree, but that was not even the evidence that I (a 13 year old kid at the time) was using to draw my conclusion. In my opinion then (and still) the main argument was that the brain is not magical, and provided that Moore's law would continue, computers would eventually be able to do most of the things a human brain is doing.

While it might take some time for computers to do all things as well as the brain, computers would have advantages in terms of cost, space requirements and not being restricted to 9g (for fighters). I think the 40 year engineer and 50 year old former fighter pilot had a model of the mind that were dualist, ie there was some ghost in the machine that allowed humans to do things that computer never will be able to.

Many famous thinkers have had similar ideas, such as Gödel, von Neumann and Penrose, all extremely intelligent.

Now, the consensus has shifted, but Penrose has not changed his mind. Recent developments in AI may be seen as pretty hard evidence that computers one day will be able to do what the brain is doing, but Penrose doesn't think the evidence is strong enough, and still looks for his ghost in the machine in quantum effects within neurons.

As for the original discussion, I actually don't have a strong opinion. But when someone claims that something is 'obnoxiously obvious', I presume good faith, and that evidence has already been presented, but not yet accepted by the community.

Maybe I was unfair in my first comment in this thread. Generally, strong claims do require strong evidence. But it IS pretty common for the Old Guard to require the evidence for a new idea to meet much higher standards than the evidence for the old idea, and if so, it is typically the case that one just has to wait and see what will become the consensus over time (often more than 1 generation).
Biden Says U.S. Would Intervene Militarily If China Invaded Taiwan
S3 credentials and WebDAV are also options for tiddlywiki.
Both generics and the errors.Is/errors.As interface began life as "Go 2" projects. "Go 2" is a catch-all bucket for anything that might need to be incompatible.
Larry Ellison plotted with Trump aides about overturning election, report says
For what it's worth, other big companies are building their own verticals, like Messenger Payments and Google Pay.
ah, that's pretty cool! It looks like concatenation is a O(log(n)) operation involving appending a bunch of zeros rather than just a multiplication, though?
There is simple and then there is insistence on everything to be either "you need to maximize exposure" or "any small amount of it is super bad" with no middle ground allowed. There is simple and then there is "so overly simplistic, that it is almost guaranteed to harm those who take it seriously".
It seems to me then that the real problem is not constructing a surveillance system, but designing a trustworthy surveillance system in the first place.
Yes, Apple has had this for awhile, but apparently there was an underlying change in April when the service shifted from Discover to Visa [1].

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Pay#Apple_Cash
Zelle and Square's Cash App were not too late. They are both very popular in the US and by all accounts Venmo is the one trending downward in usage. The near future looks like Cash App in first and seconded by Zelle. You're just in a certain segment of the US where Venmo still has first place.

Here's some data from Google: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%205-y&ge...
Can confirm. CS61A is a monster of a weeder course lol.

If you don't have a background in programming/computer science and come in fresh with starry eyes, you better be a prodigy in learning, because it's a lot of material in a very short amount of time.
In examples, when adding an item to the list, I see a brief flash of the target state, then it goes back to the previous state and then an animation happens (mobile safari).

Is there a way for the library to eliminate this “blink”? Or is this behavior unavoidable with current one liner approach?
It refers to the fact that if you hit "save" it'll first modify its own code, then spit it out again as a download. So it does output its own code, and not in the sense of just having viewable code.
A 15-20% spread between official and unofficial exchange rates is relatively small, compared to your Polish example. Right now, it is more or less impossible for any Russian to a) use the dollar to buy anything from outside Russia, and b) travel outside Russia to buy anything in the first place. That greatly reduces the demand for exchanging rubles for dollars.

This is true, whether via official or unofficial means. Consider Argentina (which rootsudo mentioned), a country that for years has had its own serious economic issues. A huge skew between the official and black-market exchange rate for hard currency, such as in Argentina (the "dolar azul"), exists because a) there are capital controls but b) it's still possible to use those dollars/Euro/Swiss franc/whatever. Argentineans are free to use the US dollar to buy things, both inside and outside Argentina. This is not true for Russians.
I tried Manjaro in a VM and was pretty disappointed by AUR. The selection is only a little ahead of Debian's official core packages. Debian 11 and derivatives really have a lot.

I also don't like how you have to compile your own AUR frontend. You would think that would be pre-included, since it seems to be one of the star attractions of Arch.

I wasn't a fan of how long it takes to compile things. I also remember having to figure out dependencies manually, it doesn't just do it all for you like apt/dpkg.

I don't fully trust it any more than random AppImages from GitHub releases, to be honest, since I've heard there has been malware in the past, and compiling yourself gives zero protection.

Unless you are going to read through tens of thousands to millions of lines of code, you're still just trusting whoever put the package up there, and hoping you would have heard about it if there was a virus. I suspect not nearly as many people go around randomly reviewing code as some might like to think.

It does work, and I can see the value if you want to use things that for whatever reason aren't in Debian.

I actually kind of like the curation effect that Debian has though. If it's in the repos, it gives you a clue about what is popular enough that someone bothered maintaining it. If it's not in Debian and Fedora, it's probably more experimental than I'd like it to be.
Sounds like catch-22 either way. Certainly an interesting problem.
Could do with an apostrophe in that title. Without it, the meaning is completely different.
No, I don't think the grandfather comment meant that.
I can make my own currency, and call it "the best performing currency of all time". This is just what the russia gov has been doing.

1) The gov has forced companies to exchange 80% of their external income to rouble.

2) The gov has used billions (from their own war chest) to prop the rouble.

3) Inside russia, you really can only use RUB as, there is a wide ban on sales of foreign currency. (The ban might be in the form of ridiculous exchange rates)

4) The black market has a completely different exchange rate than the banks do.

5) Global trad volume is down to near zero.

https://www.poundsterlinglive.com/data/currencies/usd-pairs/...

(Scroll down for trade volumes)
And why go so extreme?

I wouldn’t. I’d break it up the same as you, with those 3 functions. After we’d shown we were going to be doing lots of similar things. But given the choice between too complicated and too simple, that’s the direction I’d lean.

Apologies if that wasn’t clear in context.