skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That doesn't make sense. An NFT exists purely in the realm of reality. It has a real (non-fungible!) representation as 1s and 0s and it's etched into "the blockchain". That's just as "real" as the atoms that makeup a bicycle. Arguably, much less valuable, but still real. At the end of the day, the NFT is represented by atoms as well.

If you steal my bike, that's theft. If you steal my DVD collection, that's theft. If you steal my steam account, that's theft. If you steal my NFT, that's theft.
one should not have to rely on the hugely imbalanced power structure between employer and employee to get better working conditions.

these people have stopped licking the boots of capitalism and started to demand change. there’s nothing wrong with that, and there’s no inherent moral value that people should adhere to in their work relationship that precludes them from forming a union.
Oh, did not know that. so 5G also includes a communication protocol ? E.g. could I make 5G work through 2.4 gHz (WiFi frequency, right ? ) and would it work well ? e.g. gigabit speeds thru 2.4 gHz ? I genuinely don't know, don't mean to make a stupid question.

kinda stupid question: (not meaning to sound as an asshole question) Isn't the mmWave part of 5G itself ? Or what would you define as 5G ?
I thought I was doing well after not being overly surprised by DALL-E 2 or Gato. How am I still not calibrated on this stuff? I know I am meant to be the one who constantly argues that language models already have sophisticated semantic understanding, and that you don't need visual senses to learn grounded world knowledge of this sort, but come on, you don't get to just throw T5 in a multimodal model as-is and have it work better than multimodal transformers! VLM[1] at least added fine-tuned internal components.

Good lord we are screwed. And yet somehow I bet even this isn't going to kill off the they're just statistical interpolators meme.

[1] https://www.deepmind.com/blog/tackling-multiple-tasks-with-a...
not on all machines (cough IBM cough ...)
We call it the lottery — the last ~5 years we "won"; this year? Maybe not so much.
I think that we agree, I also try to do the right thing when possible/practical...
Clarifying my point further: Let's say I'm looking at a hex dump of memory contents (as you still can do in gdb and lldb with "p/x"). The debugger shows me four consecutive bytes as: 0x89ABCDEF. If I'm on a big-endian IBM 360, I can say to myself "to figure out what integer that is, I'll compute 8<<28 + 9<<24 + A<<20 + B<<16 + C<<12 + D<<8 + E<<4 + F<<0". Nice sequence of shift amounts, decreasing by four for each single-hex-digit in order. If I'm on a little-endian 8008, I have to compute "F<<24 + E<<28 + D<<16 + C<<20 + B<<8 + A<<12 + 9<<0 + 8<<4". Not such a nice sequence of shift amounts. So, my question is, why don't true little-endians say it should be F<<28 + E<<24 + D<<20 + C<<16 + B<<12 + A<<8 + 9<<4 + 8<<0?

Succinctly, why is the big-endian number 0x01234567 not known as 0x76543210 to little-endians? Why are they OK in calling it 0x67452301? That sure looks like a mix of big-endian nibbles in the little-endian bytes.
The good news is zombies won't burn us out with some soul-sucking methodology.
Scaling up improved versions of existing recipes can be done surprisingly fast if you have strong DL infrastructure. Also, GPT-3 was built on top of previous advances such as Google’s BERT. I’m surprised that it took Google so long to answer w/ PaLM, though it seems plausible to me that they wanted a clear enough qualitative advancement that people didn’t immediate say, “So what.”

You could’ve had the same reaction years ago when Google published GoogleNet followed by a series of increasingly powerful Inception models - namely that Google would wind up owning the DNN space. But it didn’t play out that way, perhaps because Google dragged its feet releasing the models and training code, and by the time it did, there were simpler and more powerful models available like ResNet.

Meta’s recent release of the actual OPT LLM weights is probably going to have more impact than PaLM, unless Google can be persuaded to open up that model.
MSG Isn’t Unhealthy
> Theoretically though, it should continue to work while in motion right? Perhaps with a bit more latency than if the unit was stationary?

It probably won't work great. The Starlink unit has a phased array forming narrow beams of reception and transmission to the satellite, and assumes it's on a stable platform.

It's possible to build a system that is robust to bounces and yaws, but that doesn't mean that they have.
There's people out there whose opinions are that addiction is a problem that "eventually solves itself". When I first heard that I just tried to change topics as quick as possible, it was just a conversational dead end. I still don't know what to say.
OK thanks I figured there was a connection between computational power and thermodynamics when you get to a small enough scale but I wasn't sure how to apply it!
Maybe, but I would interpret this to mean that they can't guarantee a seamless handoff between zones. Like, they obviously have to hand off between satellites all the time since they're all in motion, but it seems the expectation here is that the service could drop (for what, a second? a few seconds? a minute or two?) as it realises that you're in a new location and it needs to schedule in your transitions.
Re. cloaking and structured data, see https://developers.google.com/search/docs/advanced/structure...
Here’s Google’s documentation on that: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/advanced/structure...
Powerful American Artillery Enters the Fight in Ukraine
HN submission feedback: This is a poor submission.

The linked page is just a bland study information page. This made it to the front page of HN despite being relatively free of actual information.

What's more, the subject line is misleading or wrong. This is not in any way the first human application of antitumor viruses (oncolytic viral therapy which has been going on for a few years), just the first person on this study (presumably -- the link in fact doesn't even indicate FPFD [first patient, first dose] has happened).
If you read their review on USB microphones (the one that Yeti wins), they link to audio recordings of all the microphones so you can judge for yourself. I have no comment on whether they are considered "paid advertising", but I agree with the OP - their audio-based reviews are thorough and come across as unbiased.
Beat me to posting the same quote. I don't always manage to follow it, but it has helped me sometimes.
Pretty sure Starlink forlvomg vehicles will be a completely different service entirely.

I know a few airlines contracted with them to provide in-flight internet. My assumption is that different hardware would be needed given both the vehicle and the satellite are moving simultaneously. I could be wrong.
Product segmentation does not require actual reasons beyond "higher revenue".
It works: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PDVURcvWeg
I think most of your questions are answered here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5G
From their ToS:
Best Effort Service for RV Users. Network resources are always deprioritized for Starlink RVs users compared to other Starlink Services, resulting in degraded service and slower speeds in congested areas and during peak hours. Stated speeds and uninterrupted use of the Service are not guaranteed. Service degradation will occur most often in "Waitlist" areas designated on the Starlink Availability Map during peak usage hours. See the Starlink Specifications for expected performance of the Starlink for RV Services.
What we need is the scientific community to come together like they did for Covid vaccines... we need an addiction vaccine for drugs and alcohol...

It probably killed a lot more people then Covid-19...
Imagen takes text embeddings, OpenAI model takes image embeddings instead, this is the reason. There are other models that can generate text: latent diffusion trained on LAION-400M, GLIDE, DALL-E (1).
I'm aware that they expect one of their customers to be stock market companies where lower latency is highly important. Are you referring to that or something else?
My mom is exactly the same and I really admire her for it.
Ah, fair enough. I didn't look into the company, I've just come across suggestions along this line.
> 100 degree cone free from any obstacles, 25 degrees up from the horizon

Yeah, but that's not really a tall order, particularly in the kinds of places where 4G/5G coverage is bad or nonexistent. Maybe not where you're deep in a gorge or under a tree canopy, but lots of the wilderness is open space, or at least has open space accessible.
An f-string evaluates to a string and not to an object such as a compiled regex. For this there are tagged template literals in Javascript (which got them from E). Example: https://github.com/erights/quasiParserGenerator
I made an AI write a story about AI then I made another AI illustrate it
This is completely unrelated to the contents of your comment, but did you use (a) to denominate the first item and then (2) to denominate the second in your third paragraph?!
This. I doubt the moving target part matters much since it's a few ms of travel time, but unless you are driving perfectly straight on a smooth highway,nthe turning and bouncing would probably aim the beam wrong faster than it could compensate
This is a bizarre article. You never even hear about 99% of “important” news because it doesn’t get reported, and there are no consequences for ignoring it. You can just ignore the news if you want.
I would presume because flu vaccines etc. require infecting a human with a virus in some form or another, there was plenty of time to ensure engineered viruses do not transmit.
That’s a poetic description of what sounds like a wonderful relationship. Hats off to you!
SpaceX executive defends Elon Musk against misconduct accusations
Pinging.net – monitor/ping your internet connection
Embed it in tiny, tiny things.
Test strips are inconvenient to use.
You have to mix you drugs in water to test them, which means if you want to snort your drugs you need to plan ahead far enough to dry them back out again.

If you don't mix the correct ratio of drugs to water its very easy to get false positive (for amphetamines and mdma) or a false negative with others.

Also, frankly, it makes the whole experience less sexy and fun. I know its a dumb reason but its true.
Vladimof: Unfortunately it's not only a physical ailment. It's a complex mental and emotional issue, too. Hard to concoct a vaccine targeting all 3 axes with current technology levels.
All three are relatively similar, in terms of being designed around a DAG model and focused on data pipelines. If your workflow fits neatly into that box and your team already has experience using one of them successfully, then the effort involved in switching might outweigh the gain.

While my experience with those specific tools is limited, I have used other DAG-based systems (notably Apache Oozie) quite a bit. I can't think of anything I did with those that I couldn't do with Temporal.

Temporal is distinct in that it's neither limited to DAGs nor to data pipelines. I suppose it is therefore a super-set, even though I don't really think of it that way (much as I don't think of Go or Rust as a super-set of bash).
I'm not sure it could even work any other way. Either mobile users are subject to deprioritization or there is no such thing as guaranteed service for anyone, including mobile users still.
If you have not read the famous essay “I, Pencil” (and the invisible hand), you’d enjoy it. As I recall it is only 10-15 pages and in the public domain.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/I,_Pencil
Will that be less of an issue when a larger portion of their satellite fleet have laser interconnects? I think I read somewhere that the required ground stations are a limitation of the initial launches without laser connections...
In many rural areas the rollout of 5g has been a downgrade in service quality.
One thing people don't realize is that there's no training for advising Ph.D. students. Or, if there is, it's very rudimentary.

Compare this with how much training there is for K-12 education, or for teaching undergraduate courses. So, people who start a Ph.D. face the brutal switch from getting very well polished education to getting to be advised "by the ear".

Many advisors are just naturals. Guess what, students flock to them, so when it's your turn, it's likely that they already have 6 or maybe 8 or 10 Ph.D. students. Some advisors are just really bad, and people avoid them. But most advisors are in between. The experience of being their student will be so-so.

But more generally, the experience of doing a PhD will be very different from undergrad. The pattern I noticed is plenty of introductory courses (i.e. upper undergrad level), and plenty of very advanced (or "Topics") courses. Very few intermediate courses. So, a lot of your education will be self-provided. In the end, that's good, you can't expect to be spoon-fed all your life. But many students find this experience quite difficult.

Well, who said a PhD is a walk in the park? You need to work hard.

Your advisor is not perfect? Or maybe is the opposite of perfect? Welcome to the party. Lots and lots of other PhD students have the same problem. Some quit, but most don't. You can switch your advisor. You can talk to other PhD students and postdocs, and see what they work on, maybe you can realign your research topic. You can even switch departments.

Now, about quantum computation. It's the first course I took when I started my PhD more than 20 years ago. It was just as promising at the time as it is now. My conclusion: quantum computation will be just like nuclear fusion, 20 or 30 years in the future.

But if you decided you want to pursue research in quantum computation, presumably you went beyond an introductory course, and you came to the conclusion that there's something worth pursuing. If only now you find out that the emperor has no clothes, then maybe it's your fault too for not paying attention during those introductory classes.

So, sorry for what you've been through. You're not the only one who finds the PhD experience a tough one. Thrown in water and asked to swim is how many others find the experience. Most do not drown.

As others have said it in this thread, outing your advisor is not that cool. I'm happy you decided to pull down the post. Good luck in your future endeavors.
I guess what OP meant was that Deezer might have removed the limit, not the playlist.
It’s just my opinion but I think the meme you’re talking about is deeply related to other branches of science and philosophy: ranging from the trust old saw about AI being anything a computer hasn’t done yet to deep meditations on the nature of consciousness.

They’re all fundamentally anthropocentric: people argue until they are blue in the face about what “intelligent” means but it’s always implicit that what they really mean is “how much like me is this other thing”.

Language models, even more so than the vision models that got them funded have empirically demonstrated that knowing the probability of two things being adjacent in some latent space is at the boundary indistinguishable from creating and understanding language.

I think the burden is on the bright hominids with both a reflexive language model and a sex drive to explain their pre-Copernican, unique place in the theory of computation rather than vice versa.

A lot of these problems just aren’t problems anymore if performance on tasks supersedes “consciousness” as the thing we’re studying.
1. Open article

2. Cmd + F

3. "Bridgewater"

4. Breathe a sign of relief

For those who haven't read it yet, check out Dalio's book Principles. (The audiobook is good and partially narrated by Dalio himself.) Ray's a little out there, but the book was one of the most thought-provoking things I read last year, and I regret sleeping on it for as long as I did.
That dichotomy doesn't exist, because everything is ruled by law. But the courts look at the entire situation as well, and you'll find that having actively lied to people or not does make a difference in fraud cases.
I have my suspicions that prior American governments intended (with full knowledge) for the cartels to get more powerful (by means of increasing corruption and letting only those kinds of crime-willing people to service the outlawed black markets)

I recall reading about an economist who based on studying the failure of the prohibition, tried to warn about the futility of 'war on drugs'; from this I thought that if some economist knew it'd fail, so could the government have known....
Look at any field which has a lot of moving parts - economics, social sciences, management, nutrition and so on.

None of them have good theory. It's probably not possible.
The hackers will not be far behind. You can run some of the v1 diffusion models on a local machine.

I think it's fair to say that this is the way it's always been. In 1990, you couldn't hack on an accurate fluid simulation at home, you needed to be at a university or research lab with access to a big cluster. But then, 10 years later, you could do it on a home PC. And then, 10 years after that, you could do it in a browser on the internet.

It's the same with this AI stuff.

I think if we weren't in the midst of this unique GPU supply crunch, the price of a used 1070 would be about $100 right now -- such a card would be state of the art 10 years ago!
You think that code looks nice? You've been too deep into the code for too long.
No official mobile phone ?
I thought the weird text in DALL-E 2 was on purpose to prevent malicious use.
I understand the desire here to get more performance out of macOS for web development. The problem is that even if you have the right stack installed writing and executing code in macOS is not the same as doing it in the same OS and stack that the code is deployed on. You will still run into situation where it “works on my machine” but fails when deployed.

A common set of issues has to do with the file system.
Thank you, I'm aware of that. That has very little bearing on whether there's a policy of border interdiction or not, since borders include things like ports and international airports.
She tried this in the video… you have to watch it but basically it just bounced off the clay layer. Her soil is exceptionally poor.
Okay, but that's not a very useful answer when there are a number of technical reasons why the restriction might exist.
Complaining about flaws in a few papers is like saying “I found a piece of software with a bug” and then claiming software engineering is a broken field based on those examples. The argument about peer review is not that it’s perfect on any given paper, but that someone who has repeatedly survived a publication competition with a ~20% success rate and then got other serious researchers to cite and build their work is probably not a total piker. Everyone makes a few mistakes and papers, but in the aggregate it is a shockingly hard gauntlet to run, whatever your impressions may be from the sidelines.
> forlvomg

I love this typo.
Informed decisions are meaningless on an individual level. The government will be the same no matter who I vote for. Voting is just a way to feel like you did something without any effort
Are they though? It's really not that expensive to manage 4G towers vs sending up thousands of small sats.
It depends a lot on their software/hardware design. Doppler can have a non-trivial effect if it isn’t taken into account, even at highway speeds, let alone having to constantly re-aim.
There is actually research in that area! Apparently one can make a vaccine that trains the immune system to attack and remove drugs. But it could interfere with medical procedures because of the overlap with recreational drugs. Also the huge ethical and moral questions it poses like who gets final say over what you do with your own body. Unlike a viral disease, getting high isn't contagious and doesn't directly and immediately affect those around you.
I ran into that about 10 years ago with a certain infrastructure as code framework.

I versioned my code as YYYYMMDD.patch then couldn’t get subsequent versions to deploy. After enough debugging I figured out it was due to my major version silently causing an integer overflow.
I'm not convinced that the statistical number of people that would regularly move outside their "primary service area", or original owner resale, etc, would drive real issues for them.

Are there reports, for example, that the mass movement of these things into Ukraine is causing significant issues?
It is an interesting risk assessment worrying about engineered viruses, when we are literally surrounded by them and any of them could mutate and become dangerous. I have always assumed that an engineered virus specifically engineered to not transcend its limits would be less likely to become a problem than all the other viruses whose ability to mutate around our immune systems is required for them to survive more than a few years. Or is there a factor I'm unaware of, such as the the most useful sources to work from are also the most virulent with nasty behavior just one mutation away from being switched on?
Why is it so difficult for an ISP which actually cares about delivering a pro-consumer service to exist in the United States?

The common duopoly choice between AT&T and Comcast is a nasty one, akin to asking you to choose "would you rather receive herpes, monkeypox, genital warts, or all three?"

Their entire strategy boils down to manipulating and working against their customers best interests, greedily making more, more, always more money. At any cost, externalities be damned.

Disgusting.
We don't make anybody do anything.
The jury just needs to believe “this person stole something,” and there’s a good chance they’ll judge accordingly. At least there’s a good enough chance that it will happen that it will likely lead to an out of court settlement.
Kerberos – A Dialogue – 1998
yeah cuz tyler is the authority on this matter
Since segments are determined by folders, you should be able to do `/layout/page.js` for a `/layout` route.
Our shouting will sound to them like the buzzing of bees sound to us. Why would they pay any attention?
> This is the case for vitamin D from sun vs oral D supplements.

Wait, has there been a study suggesting this? This implies that there's a narrow optimal range and exceeding it causes problems. Seems you would see this in the supplement trials. Vitamin D toxicity doesn't occur until you take many times the RDA for months, and presumably none of the supplementation trials went anywhere near that high. https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/nutrition-and-h...
How to Increase Your Luck Surface Area (2010)
My information on the scene is extremely out of date, but 10 years ago it was more common for users to get some prescription morphine and convert it to heroin themselves. There was also a pretty big market for illicit acetic acid because of this, too.

This was because importation was difficult, making any imported product vastly more expensive than what you could make yourself.
It could be true, but we need more people working on this problem, that's for sure
It seems to have the same "adjectives bleed into everything problem" that Dall-E does.

Their slider with examples at the top showed a prompt along the lines of "a chrome plated duck with a golden beak confronting a turtle in a forest" and the resulting image was perfect - except the turtle had a golden shell.
Don't really know that, either. They said they didn't do an empirical analysis on it. For example, it may show a few male nurses for hundreds of prompts or it may show none for thousands. They don't give examples. Hopefully they release a paper showing the biases because that would be an interesting discussion.
> It is still statistical. You still want to predict a distribution over expected next token.

The fact that a process can be described statistically does not make the process itself statistical.
check out open source alternative dalle-mini: https://huggingface.co/spaces/dalle-mini/dalle-mini