skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> My one suggestion would be to get twice as much silverware as you think you need because somehow pieces end up going missing.

This is not the way. No!

Perfection is to get one of each type of cutlery per person. Then if something goes missing you get, no, not a replacement—you get the very best household metal detector. You do meticulous research—probably using the 50-book Searchum Arcanum collection, leather-bound—meditate on your findings, and then finally ask for a second opinion from the best person you know (skip the last step if you are the best person you know).
Correct.

Historically one could contribute to a GPL project (potentially on a significant level for a corp) but wouldn't worry too much about using it in your own product that was potentially locked down - ie, DRM / motor duty cycle control, rev limits etc.

Linus / Linux have a long history of being pretty relaxed about your use cases, with the one key provision that you share your code.

Now, the group of people who can sue you is much larger. And some of them (conservancy in particular) may have views that don't align with your GPLv2 interpretation (particularly around tivoization / lock down issues for hardware devices). So if you are contributing too and shipping GPLv2 code - yes, you as the distributor of a larger body of code probably have a higher risk now of being sued.
There are transaction IDs to the exchanges

There wont be transaction IDs after that because its not onchain

You and the community could ask for an audit by an accounting firm like Deloitte, like the rest of the business world uses, itll come out a quarter or two from now leaving us all in exactly the same spot for now. The transparency expectations make almost no sense or lack inspiration.
He is using the hyperbole and contrast to "best" to make his point.
The other option is downtime: boot into another OS, so you can mount the disk to be backed up as read-only.
I'm not sure I understand the scale from exuberant consumerism to rodent play thing. I think your middle ground is still just a singular point at the consumerism extreme.

One could argue that "old gross junk" is just another strawman. Not something that can really be quantified outside of your personal feelings.

I think we might be better off if we came to terms with the fact that old gross junk may actually be all we have in the future if we continue our current way of living.

Might as well try to get along today.
Except that it is rarely a single third party server. Every semi-popular website will be highly available.

And with the popularity of the cloud it has made it available across data centres and even regions.

So it is debatable whether P2P is more reliable than centralised.
> A whole language can start to develop around not just the consumption of goods, but the consumption of experience: “We did Prague.” “We did Barcelona.”

Couldn't agree more with that statement. I hate that terminology, it maps travel and experience into check-boxes that you ought to complete. I don't know why, but it feels wrong to me.
Don’t worry. The correct answer is always Fuji. FTFY
Sure. I just don't care. I've got $40 and that's my preference.
What a weirdly US-centric question.
It sounds like Twitter could easily shed hundreds of millions of fake followers by banning Elon Musk any account that follows Elon Musk!
So weird to see people want to have identitiy requirements to post online. I'd prefer to be anonymous, even this account is pushing being to attached to my real life identify.
There are 5-10 small to medium-sized companies active in this space along with various academic efforts. The biggest problem for low or no cost alternatives has been the difficulty in creating a graphical front end of merit, or agreeing which promising candidate will be generally supported. To date, it’s been a small market with huge upside that’s not been realized (drugs can make 1-2B per qtr).

The problem with data mining (which has been done in various forms since the 50’s) is the quality of the data and it’s (in)consistency.
That's why my language of choice is TypeScript, but I think Sorbet looks promising (haven't used it though)
50$ for a place sounds insane to me. That's 800$ just for your set of 16. My whole set of 12 set me back 80€ and it still works six years later; if it ceases to do so at some point, I'll gladly get another one. I'm not saying you should buy cutlery where you'll eat paint after the second dishwasher run, but you can get something solid and nice looking for far less.
I believe those go hand in hand. The smarter the animal usually the more personality they have.
YouTube plagued by fake Elon Musk Bitcoin giveaway videos
Very small compared to coal draglines like "big muskie"

Why make a mere train to eventually make a building, when you can make a large building that moves?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Muskie

Interesting to think that Big Muskie was significantly larger in all dimensions than the residence hall I lived in for my first year of university. One machine moved more material than two panama canals in its lifespan...

Big Muskie was not a fast mover but it could have made that proverbial 400 mile trip in about 5 months, which isn't all that bad. I do believe it would have cost more overall, which is why they didn't do it this way. I would imagine trying to ford a river with Big Muskie would have been very exciting indeed.
Pretty much cold, yeah. I'd meditated 10-20 minutes occasionally over a few years but never kept up a habit for more than a week. I didn't read very much on the subject either, although I did read Sam Harris's "waking up", which is what convinced me that a retreat was the best way to learn meditation.

I'd recommend trying to find a place with qualified teachers. I went to a Goenka retreat (i.e. dhamma.org) and there were some weird things about it: all the teaching was done through 30-year recordings of a guy who's been dead for 10 years. The facilitators actually present at the retreat were his "assistant teachers", and in my case they didn't seem to have a lot of expertise. They seemed to be following Goenka's script and were reluctant to deviate. I think everyone there really meant well and had no ulterior motives, but there were cult-y vibes nonetheless. If you can put up with that and are willing to work through difficulties largely on your own then maybe I'd recommend it. I had a great experience, in the end. The food and facilities were also quite nice.

Also, I had some intense experiences that I would have thought were only possible with psychedelic drugs. It really scared me at one point: I was sure I was losing my mind. I almost asked to be taken to a hospital and put on antipsychotics. I think there is a chance that if I had done that, things would have gone very badly for me.

The other people on the retreat with me apparently did not have experiences like this. But it's not unique to me. [1]

Just go into it with an appreciation that you're attempting something significant and powerful and probably (at least for now) a bit outside of rational understanding.

It was worthwhile for me. I had a hard time justifying taking 10 days away from everything, but ultimately I convinced myself that it would be exciting to spend 10 days doing something wildly different from what I've done basically every other day for the last couple of years. Variety of experience is a good thing, right? :)

[1] https://www.brown.edu/research/labs/britton/research/varieti...
Matching releng/13.1 source to D31138, it did.

Source: https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/tree/sys/modules/pf/Makefile?h=...

D31138: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D31138
I was CTO/head of R&D at a company where we were sensing where someone
touched an object based on sounds. I was able to semi-accurately
position a finger tap on a glass phone surface. That was in 2016.

Caveats:

We used contact microphones. Taking the data out of the air from an
acoustic signal would be much harder, but not impossible in a quiet
room with some fancy DSP.

There is a symmetry such that tapping the same distance from corner A
is indistinguishable from tapping the equivalent position in corner B.
Still, for a 4 x 4 PIN entry that's useful extra info.

It depends on the physiology, finger length and nails of the operator,
and how they hold the phone. The fact that this may also be a unique
identifier of the operator should not be a surprise.
Maybe this is a dumb question, but why is it so important that all of your flatware match that you would replace your full set because you can't replace a few pieces with ones that match?
Probably not, but managers make good pay. Store managers require someone who is both able to do the job (which is complex), and willing to move where the company needs a store manager. If you want to manage "a department" you can get promoted at any store, but if you want to manage the store there are only a few positions, so you move to assistant manager at whatever store needs it, then move to store manager at a different store - these may both be out of state moves.

It was 20 years after leaving McDonald's before I'm no longer sure I wouldn't have made more working at McDonald's than as a programmer. The job path all the way up was known to me. Even now I'm not sure - it depends on if I was willing keep competing for the more and more rare positions above store manager, and how I did compared to the others. I'm glad I didn't go that way - for me it the money isn't worth it.
We would keep trying to chip at the wall regardless.
Our cat responds to Enya.

When I'm working from my desk at home, she often crash lands in my lap and then rolls over, all four paws fully stretched as the ultimate invitation for a belly rub. This blocks my arms from doing work, but she doesn't care.

Next, I turn on Enya, the exact same playlist every single time. The moment the music starts she starts cycling her front paws with her eyes closed, as if riding an invisible bicycle upside down.

I need to fully enclose her with both arms to not drop her and I love the arrogance in making that my problem, not hers.

I don't know why it's Enya. It could be that it was playing the first time this happened, creating a positive memory association. Or maybe she just likes the sounds. In any case, no paw cycling without Enya. When I pause the song she immediately stops, opens her eyes and stares at me in digust, which is cat for: put it back on, idiot.
As others are saying here, this seems like taking it to the extreme.

As usual in life, the middle path seems best.

Unless it is your hobby, it isn’t worth finding the absolute best of anything. Find something that is good and that you like and you’ll be doing well.

At the same time they are just material possessions, so don’t get too attached.

Things were meant to be used. When they get scuffed, scratched, and dinged in the course of duty why worry about it (unless it impacts the use of it).
Digital Alchemy: A Post-Mortem of the Crypto Crash
About the security content of iOS 15.5 and iPadOS 15.5
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6: Better security, more options
I must use twitter differently to everyone else because I don't see the 90% of all twitter is bots and spam.

My timeline is people I follow; sometimes they retweet absolutely demented retarded shit that makes no sense but they nevertheless believe in.

"The algorithm" just brings the more engaged stuff from people I follow to the top, however, I don't use it because while I don't care about someone I follows hot take on thing happening right now, I care even less in 2 days time. As far as I can tell it hasn't turned me into a socialist / white supremacist.

Occasionally I will take a look at "trending" - Yes 90% of what is posted is utter garbage, but its not coming from bots and spam, its coming from people.
Old gross junk isn't all I have right now. So I'm happy to take the option. I guess I'm supposed to be embarrassed by that according to certain people? I'm not at all.
How to find people looking for work
What has changed in Monterey 12.4
RAII is superior, but there's also another go pattern for that which reads better than your two alternatives sometimes:

// You _must_ 'defer closeFunc()' (with closeFunc being the second return value) after this function,
// even if this function returns an error.
// You do not need to call File.Close() on the returned file, only closeFunc()
func openFileAndPeakHeader(path string) (*os.File, func() error, error) {
closeF := func() error { return nil }
f, err := os.Open(path)
if err != nil {
return nil, closeF, err
}
closeF = f.Close
// ...
if _, err := f.Read(data); err != nil {
return nil, closeF, err
}
return f, closeF, nil
}

Unfortunately, it relies on someone reading docs for them to determine that this isn't an Either<(File, func), error>, but rather an Either<File, (func, error)>, but that's how go works anyways. You have to read doc comments to know what types an 'error' might be, you have to read docs to know if return values are Either or not (i.e. file.Read returns n, err, and both are meaningful, not just one of them).

It's not good, but I think it's better in some cases than the options you presented.
The Software Engineering Bubble Just Popped
There’s people in these territories which have to buy into the transaction. It’s not the 19th century anymore.
You seem to be really offended by this statement, you even went to his profile to find something to attack him?

GP isn't trying to write a paper, he's stating an observation based on his experience with the animals he's had.

Feel free to dispute the above statements with research or anecdotes, but solely insulting people and getting angry just reflects poorly on you.

I can only assume you are one of those stupid cats seeing how you handled yourself in this thread :)
https://discourse.gnome.org/t/support-donate-to-meld/6909:

“We usually don’t receive donations for specific GNOME projects, but we collect donations for the whole organization. You can donate to GNOME at Donate – GNOME 6

Thanks for your interest in helping!“

(donation link is https://www.gnome.org/donate/)
You have people reviewing them in YT. LGTM.
You are missing a large value to GPL code, it's often developed collaboratively.

Consider carefully your example, you've contributed to some GPLv2 body of code. Now you ship that code on your device (making available corresponding source code, but not decryption keys). You are not the only copyright holder, this is a collective effort.

Can you avoid the GPL'ed requirements? No. More critically, this allows new requirements to be asserted (under the GPL) that GPLv2 developers might not have considered something they want to enforce (hardware unlock) but users and activists might want to try and enforce.

All good for the users. Glad to hear this is welcomed by developers and those hiring open source contributors. This is still going to be a change from past GPLv2 experience I think for some / many.
As with most things, the real answer is somewhere in the middle.

Obsess over extremes of design or performance if that's what you need. Cheap out on the dollar store version if it gets the job done. Buy the middle-of-the-road version if that's the best value.

The "best" of anything can be defined along many axes (price, performance, design, durability, weight, etc), and compromise is usually necessary. It's strange that both authors abandon this nuance.
(Promscale team member)

As @akulkarni said, Promscale supports Prometheus metrics and OpenTelemetry traces natively and there are different ways to correlate both signals. I am actually delivering a talk that goes over the different ways you can correlate Prometheus and OpenTelemetry data tomorrow at Prometheus Day :)

One is via adding exemplars to your Prometheus metrics that link to specific traces that are representative of the value of those metrics. In Promscale you can store all that information and then display it in Grafana as explained in 1. That's the way that is most often discussed but typically involves deploying one backend for metrics and one backend for traces instead of just one as is the case with Promscale.

With Promscale you can also correlate metrics and traces using SQL joins. That opens a whole set of new possibilities. For example, imagine if you could retrieve the slowest requests happening on services running on nodes where CPU usage is high to understand how they are impacting their performance. Or imagine you are seeing a specific OOM error often in your traces and you could run a SQL query to look at the evolution of memory usage in the last 24 hours of nodes where those OOM errors are more frequent to see if you spot anything strange happening. You could even go a step forward andretrieve in the same query what processes are consuming the most memory in those nodes to pinpoint the processes that could be causing the issue.

[1] https://grafana.com/docs/grafana/latest/basics/exemplars/
Exactly my impression after reading the article.

I've been saying it since it came out, React Hooks was a HUGE mistake. It fractured the ecosystem into two completely different ways to use React.

Personally I find Hooks code much harder to comprehend. And this article is a perfect example of why even simple looking Hooks code comes with unintuitive behavior.

Someone needs to fork React, remove Hooks, and merge `componentDidUpdate` and `componentDidMount` into one function with a flag to determine if it's "on mount", so I don't have to keep calling `componentDidUpdate` from `componentDidMount`.

I've been using React at work for 8 years straight FWIW, and can't wait to use something else. I'd be happier using jQuery at this point
I've been using Axiom on my site (leerob.io) for a few months now, really enjoyed it. It was far easier to set up than other observability tools and I even created some custom alerts.
My life is more similar to that of a "partisan of the worst", so I sympathize with his general sentiment. However, this is full of strawmans.

For example, this is from the Dustin Curtis post he's criticizing:

> Reasonable people would probably not spend the time to read a book about the history of flatware, buy twenty sets, and test the feeling of each metal utensil against their teeth. That sounds completely insane. But who cares about reasonable people?

Moxie reduces that to just "internet research [which] isn’t necessarily the same as understanding".
We can only speculate but the obvious guess is a sexual fetish.
If you have to chose between two managers based on metrics, then you're already fucked one way or another. Either because you can't actually afford to lose either of them, or their both so awful that just asking people doesn't get you a good answer.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: finding ways to characterize people as bad at their jobs is about keeping salaries down, whether by accident or on purpose. Because those are metrics your boss's skip level manager looks at. And they 'work' until they don't, by which point the manager can move up or out and get a reset on the numbers being used against them.
So again: I can't find any evidence that the 3.5mm size of the connector has a spring. The bigger sizes does, but there is nothing online mentioning a spring. Please link to someone with a broken 3.5mm connector due to a spring, if you can find it. I can't.

Also, "there are examples online" != "this is a common thing". I have used dozens of 3.5mm and Bluetooth devices, and I've never had a Bluetooth device that 100% worked and I've never had a 3.5mm device that didn't work.

There are counterexamples in both categories, but my sample size is big enough now that I am willing to bet that the 3.5mm connector is just very well-designed and difficult to damage.
I run an Instagram meme bot that posts photo commits of frustrated developers from Github. My last interviewer asked me if I can guide him through an interesting project of mine and I showed him the project. He was very amused and I got an awesome offer the next day.

The bot: https://www.instagram.com/gitfuck/
Yes, and that's good. Internal use is different from redistribution.

The important point is to prevent freeloaders from taking credit from your work [and sometime even competing against you].
Software updates for the B747-400 delivered in 3.5 inch floppies
I think ideal progression would be:

1st step: Everybody have their own cars and drive them manually (current situation, too many cars)

2nd step: Minority of the private individuals now own self driving cars (next step)

3rd step: Majority of the private individuals now own self driving cars. (almost all cars are self driving now!)

4th step: Commercial entities enter the self driving car sharing market as an option to privately owning a car, you pay for a subscription and have access to a fleet of cars.

5th step: People stop buying cars and the only cars on the road are owned by commercial entities, which can be rented at will.

5th step would be ideal, as this also eliminates the need of parking spaces within the city! Whenever their services are not needed, the autonomous cars can just navigate to a parking facility/hangar in the outskirts of the city. The amount of cars on the streets can be increased and decreased at will.
Many thanks for the link, I think that's the most interesting and original thing I've read (or experienced?) this year ! :D
Plot twist: His website/search engine/blog is written by a bot and not a real person behind.
What he's describing doesn't sound to me so much as wannabe security researchers but rather as pretend security researchers who have found a niche way to beg for quick money online which requires a bit more technical skill than 419ing scamming or bartering on second hand sales because "they just lost their job" and "they need it for their kid". It's the kid's birthday. And he really wants it. Oh, he is disabled. And has cancer. Terminal.

In other words, I don't think the primary motivation is getting started in security research, nor pretending to be a competent researcher (which is how I understand the term "wannabe"). The motivation is just the money itself.
No, of course they aren't worthless. They give you the routing number, account number, and next check number in order to print your own fake checks on other people's accounts.
You're assuming some companies have ways of testing their QA effectiveness. Especially in the case where your structural engineer is incompetent.
Clever Cloud just launch Matomo aaS to get rid of Google Analytic
With some assistance and teaching, cats and dogs are capable of learning to speak in sentences. In 2018, a speech pathologist named Christina Hunger, who used AAC devices to help special needs children learn to talk, tried applying a similar approach to her dog, Stella. It worked surprisingly well. Stella could speak in four-word sentences with a vocabulary of around 15 words by her first birthday, and was up to 49 words by her third birthday. Since then, many other people have followed the same process to teach their pets how to talk.

https://www.hungerforwords.com/

https://fluent.pet/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8k2upr9vCE
> This will end up in the Appellate.

Maybe, but that isn't clear. They will try to appeal, but it isn't clear if the appeals court will accept the appeal. If the court doesn't accept the appeal, then all courts will be informed about this for future cases as lawyers try to build their case before whatever court they are in front of. If it is appealed, then whatever the final appeal result is will win (final appeal can be different in different courts so there could be conflicts until the supreme court takes this.).

My guess is the appeals court won't take this. Just a guess though.
I don't think a larger vocab would help. All the individual letters are in the ~50k token vocab already, but the word "alphabet" will still not get tokenized to [a, l, p, h, a, b, e, t]. Using a larger vocab like PaLM's 256k vocab would have the same issue.
You're supposing they bear females only ?