skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
FYI: Graphene : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphene
On the other hand, if everyone runs out and tries to build giant fabs - then the price of the goods and services required to make giant fabs will rise. If the interest rates are higher, then there will be fewer fab orders - but the price per fab will be lower.
I can’t believe it needs to be said but the answer is sight. The sense of sight is how vehicle drivers are able to navigate and avoid collisions with other vehicles.
I wonder about your setup. On an iPhone 12 on residential wifi behind a VPN, I noticed no lag, delayed rendering, or weird rendering issues.
Unsurprising to me. Good engineering includes efficiency, i.e. little energy wasted to acoustical output.
It's much more about the people than the engineering! (As long as you can follow general engineering threads and intuitively pick up when someone might be in the weeds on a project, etc. The finer details don't matter.)
The terminal is the best terminal version
YMMV, but I do marketing and communications at a startup with a small team that's used to working asynchronously. We get a lot done on Discord, I admit. But I check in a couple of times a day, on my schedule, and I don't have any notifications unless I'm actively looking at Discord. Email, well, I rarely have incoming messages that I need to respond to immediately as opposed to within 24-hours-ish.
Cool! I'm curious how the monetization part works?
Would we be able to shoot it down before it hits anything?
how do vegans rationalize owning pet animals?
Ever tried playing something like (multiplayer) Quake with an Apple trackpad? I used to win online matches with the trackpoint. Once you get use to it, the difference in speed and precision is quite significant.
Either that was a mistaken position by the hiring lead, or they were just shy to tell you that you were not the best candidate. Either way, my apologies.
> In more plain terms, the line above does something like invoke a method called “to_read” on the object (actually `struct`) “Trying”...

In fact, this invokes an associated function, `to_read`, implemented for the `Trying` type. If `Trying` was an instance `Trying.to_read...` would be correct (though instances are typically snake_cased in Rust).

I'll rewrite the line, assuming `syntax` is the self parameter:

syntax
.to_read::<&'a heavy>(|like| this.can_be(maddening))
.map(|_| ())?;

In my opinion, this is honestly not bad.
The beauty of this idea is that it solves the usual to-do list problem of adding a task and then ignoring it forever.
> Murder has, like tons of edge cases, as reviewing almost any jurisdiction’s criminal homicide laws will reveal.

In other words, you're saying that even what should be fairly simple laws have been overcomplicated by our byzantine legal system, so that prosecutorial discretion can be abused even for them. I don't disagree, but I don't see how it contradicts my basic point.
He's also very very scared to do anything of consequence. Look, the Ukrainian invasion was the only reckless thing he's ever done and look how it turned out.
Orbital inclination is 52°. That leaves about 400 million km^2.
Red Hat is 20x the size of Canonical, by revenue. We more than hold our own.
Out of interest, what language was the project written in, and what kinds of testing tools did you use?
I can't edit my comment anymore, but I have been informed that with recent firmware, s3 does seem to still work on 12th Gen Intel Core.
It's UDP style, so is it reliable? Am i wrong?
PCB Linear Motors for Model Trains
Copy that. My Apple AirPods do a terrible job pairing to my Apple iPhone Mini 13 and my Apple Mac Pro. On the other hand my wife’s 4 Apple HomePods never worked in stereo. Now they’ve been discontinued. I pay a premium for Apple because It Just Works, but… It Just Barely Works.
I use Stripe. I require logging in to a service before the extension can be used.
Graphene is a single or very few layers of Graphite
The constant employee shaming has scared everyone away.
There should be regulation that requires pass through audio setups in cars similar to what headphones have. So that you could hear everything around you just as well as if you were outside of the car.
Count me in. I've got ideas and am Fullstack.
There are perfectly unobtrusive sounds electric motorcycles can (and do) make such as beeping.
> They are all based on same chip. So if you buy 5€ BT-headphones and plug them into 1000€ dumb headphones, they very much sound the same as 1000€ BT-headphones.

That is not strictly true. While the vast majority of microcontrollers used in BT headphones come from a handful of companies (usually Qualcomm, Realtek or JieLi), the DAC and amplification stage is going to be different. Cheap headphones use the microcontroller's built-in DAC while higher end models can have a discrete chip, or sometimes a custom ASIC that also handles noise cancelling.

The protocol itself and the SBC codec are still a bottleneck of course, but in my experience an ESP32 paired to a decent quality I2S DAC module sounds much better than a random cheap BT receiver module (and has no annoying voice prompts).
They're not testing for efficacy, but rather safety. Looking for side effects etc...

Efficacy won't be proved by this trial, although potentially disproved.
An interesting note right at the end, so in case anyone missed it: this same launch is believed to be the source of 5 titanium "spaceballs" that fell onto New Zealand in 1972.

While the odds are low of any space debris hitting land, it was the photo in this article that surprised me - I was thinking billiard ball size debris, not this - http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/4542804/Government-report-o...
Further, this “problem of our own making” is us taking on greater personal risk at a net overall reduction of risk for road users as a whole.

It reminds me of the situation with cyclists where people like to complain about their “dangerous” behavior. But almost nothing a cyclist does on the road will undo the net reduction in risk to road users as a whole simply by choosing to ride a bicycle instead of operating a car.

I’m not saying that motorcycles should be unmuffled. I run a stock exhaust and do my best to idle through residential areas, and I too hate any vehicles that rattle windows and set car alarms off when they pass by. I guess my point is that if I were necromancies-king, I’d try to find a way to get all users of the road to experience empathy for others on the road and particularly for more vulnerable ones whose mere existence makes roads safer for everyone.
> Go with “smaller” document ids

What size would you recommend? UUID is 16 bytes?

> you can thank me later.

Thank you! :)
Ok, last question first: because a job pays your bills, and maybe the job is ok and pays well as long as you don't get sexually harassed. She was effectively demoted through no fault of her own. "She asked not to be demoted, which is weird" is a nonsense take.

And, "maybe the towel fell off when he turned over" is also weird. Typically, a masseuse would hold up a sheet while you turned over, and give you the time and space to do so and ask if you were covered before continuing the massage. I've had many massages, and accidental nudity would be pretty difficult.

Second, when you are getting a massage, your arms are placed by your sides on the table so the masseuse can work them while they are relaxed. Touching or grabbing the masseuse would require you to take a really uncommon action. It's also unlikely to be accidental. It's also expected that you don't reach out and touch the masseuse... If you need their attention you use words.

It's a monumental stretch to imagine this happening accidentally. Occam's razor suggests here that Musk crossed the line.
They can’t possibly do less than the police.
I don't know why California doesn't crack down on nuisance noise, especially from obnoxious cars more. It's an easy source of revenue and a quality of life problem that no one citizen will ever have the influence to have enforced, but many, many would appreciate.

It's like some people, for some inexplicable reason, revel in making their cars loud. And we all have to enjoy it at 2am.
In that situation most devs have evolved into a tech lead in their career, meaning that they have the mental responsibility for architectural decisions in software.

That also implies that the mental burden of responsibility won't allow you to stop, and you probably catch yourself trying to fix problems at night in bed that technically aren't your responsibility.

But at some point you have to reflect: is it worth it? And I mean worth in the sense of health, culture, stress and not money.

And is your team better off with the current situation or is your skill not better used in guidance and evolving team members so that they can help you more? Why not do paired coding days so that skills and knowledge can be shared? Why not hackathon days to inspire creativity for automating annoying tasks?

If I've learned any wisdom in agile teams over the years it's that a Lead also has the responsibility to lead...and not overworking themselves to death.

Giving away responsibility is very hard. I understand the reluctance to do so. But you should plan your life for a better future, and not a better present.
Snaps are pretty fantastic for IoT, which is where we started. We have some sucky things to fix for snaps on the desktop, such as astartup performance and permission handling when you want to go outside the sandbox, but we will fix those.

If you really care about security and reliability across multiple Linux distros, then containerised software distribution is particularly challenging. But it's a fun technical challenge, and we have an amazing team that's dedicated to getting it right.

Our goal is very secure, very reliable, very seamless software distribution across any Linux, and as far as I am concerned it's great that there are multiple teams working to figure out that hard problem. How lucky for you that we're not all just stuck with one option!
This is a dream scenario, but something a bit more achievable...I would like to see more buildings designed with a longer design life, so we don't have to pour concrete on the same block multiple times a century. I wonder if current emissions calcs for "Green" buildings include demolition and reconstruction when they are past their use-by date.
I agree with this. Worked with a guy who sounds exactly like OP. The official perception was that he was a smart 10x engineer. But off the record people actually hated working with him. He was a massive control freak and the only reason we bought anything up with him was so he didn't have a cry about it later.

Sometimes the "10x engineer" is just the one that's loudest and most persistent. Doesn't mean they're good. Just means no one else can be fucked dealing with them.
Optimism is the belief that problems can be solved. Since any solution not specifically prohibited by the laws of physics is possible, I’m going to go with optimism on this one.
I think what you meant is that its a real shame that wireguard completely refuses to use any common standards, or actual proper networking.
My personal experience is that people who describe their abilities like you do are actually not very good at their job but think they are.

But, assuming, you're right, you should have switched jobs yesterday to somewhere where you can be challenged. How can you be sure? You can't. But making sure to utilise the interview process is a good starting point. If you walk out of an interview just as unsure that the place won't challenge you, then either you've not asked enough questions, or they gave very wooly answers (which is a pretty good sign that the place isn't right for you).

Good luck. Feeling lonely sucks.
You did notice from the article how many minorities are stopped by police and then not even ticketed compared to non minorities?
Good news!!!
> If that was the case we would have active war in Crimea in 2014.

Nobody believed it was happening, i.e. Ukrainians never expected having to fight Russians. Now it's completely different; Ukraine has been preparing for an escalation of the war for 8 years.
If normal operations expect to be able to use different namespaces to test branches, creating namespaces etc, then bringing your own RBAC can't help.
Yeah, and it's all due to us having evolved in a world where famines were a constant threat, but now that's not an issue for many (although it's still a problem for many others.)
As betrayed by the reference to Google+, this needs a (2013).
That article mentions them dangling a wrist watch over the space ball to see if it was radioactive. How would this work?
Psychometrics work, but they are only one dimension. Interviews and competence assessments give us other perspectives on a candidate. For a single role we will have 500-3,000 applications, each step of the process helps select the best.
To be more precise, Rust uses affine types as basis for the borrow checker.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substructural_type_system

Its biggest achievement is making them more well known to mainstream devs without CS background.
Isn't this Martin Pitt's project? And it says it started in 2013. He was working for Canonical until 2014 IIRC. I would not be surprised if Red Hat scooped him up after this project was launched. Hard to know the timeline, though.
How about we tax everyone based on the acoustical emissions their machinery creates?
Yeah future computing hardware will be more diverse, but most of the things you mentioned are ultimately be programmed imperatively. GPGPUs are converging to look like many tiny general purpose CPUs, neural cores and accelerators are implemented as specialized coprocessors that accept commands from CPUs, distributed cloud compute is just farms of CPUs. All of these things have an imperative kernel, and importantly every one of them care very much about path dependencies, memory hierarchy, and ownership semantics, the very things that Rust brings to the table.

Even languages with 'exotic' execution semantics like prolog's Unification is actually implemented with an imperative interpeter like the Warren Abstract Machine/WAM, and there's not an obvious path to implementing such unorthodox semantics directly in hardware. Low-level imperative programs aren't going away, they're just being isolated into small kernels and we're building higher level abstractions on top of them.
No, that's incorrect. Low noise from a car means using several well designed mufflers on the exhaust (and ribs etc. on the air intake as well), which increase the flow resistance and decrease the power output slightly.

And if you think about it, 1 horsepower is 750 watts. A 750 watt speaker system at full volume is extremely loud, but 1 horsepower is way smaller than the statistical standard deviation in engine output.
If efficiently calculating this mapping is of interest, see also http://www.thelowlyprogrammer.com/2010/04/indexing-and-enume... .

(Python isn't my usual language these days, but this is a great example where the seamless bigint support shines. The number of possible sets grows fast!)
Perhaps tritium in the watch hands.
It’s called “selective enforcement”.
I'd echo the 48 laws of power. It gives a good insight into the common power games. A sibling comment had a bad experience with it, I was fine with it, but YMMV
Justine's work is nothing short of magic. I learn something (often many things) new from every post.
This is the advice I give to all new folks to the industry

Find a mentor. It probably won't be your manager, but someone on your team. They may not be senior, or a 10xer, or what you'd expect. They're the person that will show you how to work and more importantly, communicate effectively.

The job of a SWE is firstly to amplify value, secondly to create it, and lastly to write code. That means your job is to serve the business and product, not to write beautiful code or fast code. Sometimes they overlap, but the people who do the best work are the ones that balance that tertiary goal with delivering the product.

Make it work before you make it right. Right can mean pretty or fast. Shitty code that works can be fixed. Great code that doesn't work is useless.

Ask questions, especially from your mentor. No one expects you to know anything, and interns are in the best spot to fail and find guidance to improve. A senior that can't get stuff done gets fired, but an intern that asks for help to fix something they don't understand will be guided. Nothing you work on is mission critical and it's not a big deal if it breaks.

Don't take code review personally and don't get territorial with anything that you make. You can be incredibly happy and praised for work you do today and in a month feel like it needs to be rewritten.

Longer term, it's normal to feel shitty or stressed about work. It's not normal to feel that way all the time. If at the end of your internship you feel like you just did a tour of duty on the front lines, with sleepless nights and dreams of things going right or wrong it's ok to walk away. An internship at a big tech company is a great achievement and you will be successful wherever you land. It's important to make sure that the place you spend 40 hours a week is one that makes you happy, or at least not distressed. Don't feel like you have a duty to be loyal anywhere that you feel crappy.

And lastly on a personal note, something I was told by my high school calc teacher that I didn't internalize until I had years of professional experience under my belt was this: "your priorities in life should be family, faith, friends, and career." Now I don't care for the faith part of that, but I moved to a city I didn't know without family or friends for money. And it was the greatest regret of my life. People are more important than anything you do in an office.
Fair enough. I feel like I got decent value out of my Athlon. At the time, it sure seemed like a gross power hog. I suspect I would be shocked by its modest TDP if I went and looked back at specs.
I know. Most of its funtionality was superseeded by Js APIs which I already use (Promises vs Deferred, fetch vs. ajax). I might still need an alternative for building and editing query string parameters though. Plus most of the somewhat outdated libs in our project use it anyway.
> these are all subjective judgments that I think any sane person supports

They are legal judgments that in the end, if the case goes to trial, get made by juries. They are only "subjective" in that no person can truly see inside the mind of another, so everyone has to make their best judgment based on what they can see.

That's not at all the same as law enforcement selectively enforcing micromanagement laws--my usual go-to example is laws against speeding. Nobody even pretends that enforcement of speeding laws is a reasonable use of discretion on the part of law enforcement: enforcement is based on using such laws as a revenue source. The CFAA is the same kind of thing: as I asked in another post upthread, since fraud is already illegal, why should using a computer to commit fraud be any different from committing fraud some other way? Why not just enforce the laws we already have against fraud?

> it is not the prosecutor's sole discretion. Obviously the prosecution (which is many people who form a consensus) brings the charges, but the defense may attempt a plea for a different charge

Again, this kind of "discretion" is not the same as the kind of "discretion" involved in enforcement of micromanaging laws like speeding laws. Obviously each party in the legal process has to make judgments. Prosecutors have to decide what charges the facts they have will support. Defense lawyers have to decide how best to defend their clients given what they know. But in a sane legal system, prosecutors should not be deciding which cases to aggressively prosecute based on political considerations (e.g., how Aaron Swartz was treated), and defense lawyers should not have to decide whether to advise their clients to accept a plea bargain based on how full the court's docket is.

Nor, to get back to the subject of this thread, should prosecutors be deciding whether "white hat" security researchers are committing a crime. That should not even be on their radar. But with the CFAA, it is. And we're supposed to be so pleased that now the prosecutors will be less draconian in making such judgments than they were before.

> Maybe you should come out and say what those basic rights are and are not?

Um, how about the right not to be murdered or defrauded? Do those count?
There was a discussion around that but that was scuttled because aot was com inng up
A passive remover but still a net emitter?
Before covid I would commute daily in London to work filtering (lane splitting) through traffic. You operate on the assumption that they don't see / hear you and you need to anticipate their movements, and be much more switched on. I can almost guarantee no one has ever heard my bike from a car until I've passed by it but it's irrelevant I find as cars try to kill me even when they do see me. Biking is just more dangerous and there comes a point where you are only as safe as you are lucky.
There's a diplomatically-sensitive moratorium on shooting down space objects. Technically, sure.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-will-not-conduct-direct-...
> Just about any homicide could turn into a murder trial, if the prosecutor were so inclined

In a sane legal system, this would not be true. That is my basic point. The fact that it is true in our legal system is a bug, not a feature.
Sure, but the effectiveness will be less if the "problem" is global. If the US has 50% of the worlds demand for some good, and only the US fights inflation, then the effectiveness of the measures taken will only be 50%. So for the US maybe that is still possible, but if you are Costa Rica that becomes meaningless.
Oh yeah, that guy!
Canada to ban Huawei, ZTE 5G equipment, joining Five Eyes allies
Interesting, I’ve had the opposite experience, although it was a few years back last time I really tried to get Bluetooth working on Linux.

FWIW my work MacBook has occasional issues with audio cutting out while my personal MacBook almost never has issues.
You're right. He's referring to Asphalt concrete and confusing it with the components of cement. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asphalt_concrete