skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If this thread proves anything it’s that there is huge demand for customizable phone designs. Currently, there is total reliance on economies of scale to make standardized SKUs affordable.

Imagine if you could figure out a way of manufacturing a phone with design on demand… imagine a configurator website where you adjusted sliders and tickboxes. Headphone jack here, screen size slider all the way to the left, battery size all the way to the right, pick your color, oops you can’t have IP68 because you selected the pop-out camera…

Like variable fonts, but for hardware.

Frankly I’ve no idea how you would do it.

But that’s the level of innovation required to unlock this market.
Women also pick up a huge amount of work in the form of chores, childcare, emotional labor, and general running of the house.

This labor is typically unpaid and expected to be done on up of whatever other work the women do to pay the bills.
The worst things you can say about Scientific Reports are it doesn't have the same novelty/impact requirements as many journals* and people like to over-emphasize the "Nature" part of the name in a pointles grab for journal prestige. Journals in general can be pretty shady on a case-by-case basis. See "Nano Chopsticks" published in Nano Letters for a good materials science example of straight garbage (laughably obvious image manipulation) getting published in a fancy journal.

*Not really a problem if you correctly believe science should be more than publishing sexy results.
No, they're not in the config file.

`gcp` and `ga` are part of forgit, not OPs config. That's why searching the repo didn't find anything. From the phrasing, I thought they were part of OPs repo.

`gcp` https://github.com/wfxr/forgit/search?q=gcp

`ga` https://github.com/wfxr/forgit/search?q=ga
Didn't know, but that makes sense.

Forwards in time, backwards in abstraction level.

Thanks.
I presume it's https://gtoolkit.com/ and https://github.com/feenkcom/gtoolkit#readme but they just didn't bother checking their hyperlinks for correctness
I run LibreElec on a RPi3 A+, which has the advantage of a regular HDMI port. It runs 1080p H264 smoothly. I haven't tried 4k or H265 yet.
Most women I know never carried their phones in pockets, but in their handbags. Even in the tiny phones era.
Sure, but you presumably don't buy FreeDOS in a VM off-the-shelf for that, but setup the specific right thing for your use cases.
Buybacks increase prices, a large part of compensation is linked to share price, executives don’t care if the company is overpaying, they see more in their pocket.
I would think if you were running that you would prefer a smaller screen, having to stick a gigantic slab in my pocket whenever I transition from my walk to my jog constantly reminds me that I've got a brick flopping around in my shorts.

I never had a problem using a GPS on a small iPhone hooked up to a magnet on my dash in my car before, I can't imagine an extra inch and a half of real estate making that much of a difference.
>1) many of the assumptions in economics are culturally specific

Which ones and maybe I can comment. I don't think this is true.

> 2) many of the models in economics, while self consistent and plausible, have not been adequately tested with real world data

This is everything that we do. The entire field is all about data and has been for probably 30 years (more actually, but we can point to an improvement in our own standards in the mid-1980's).

> 3) economic models don’t seem to take constraints into account leading to absurd results like infinite growth

A very basic definition of economics in undergrad classes is "the theory of optimizing behavior subject to constraints" so constraints are very much our bread and butter.

Separately I don't think most (or any) macro economists (or growth guys) would say "yeah my model gives great predictions for what the situation will be 1,000 years in the future". Even 50 years in the future is pushing it.

>> at least the way it is popularly understood

This may be your problem. The understanding of the field you find from commenters on this website is a million miles from what it is really about.
Maybe the "fake update server" could have a "cache" for "reliability"?
Didn’t hear about much usage of Groovy outside gradle tasks, I am happy it is used for elsewhere as well!
Is this true? I know that Zoom can stream in HD, I can’t imagine the extra detail getting lost in those resolutions?
And when they're multi-generationally incestuous first cousins ...
That seems unnecessary. Today the traders have to trust the exchange to process fairly and in order -- there is no verifiability. The verifiability would be nice, but unnecessary.
>Well, I sometimes wonder... if everyone in the whole world forgot about artists like Picasso, could the masses still be convinced his art is good in modern times? I for one would be pretty unimpressed with most of his work

I mean... probably? "The masses" aren't the only judges of art, although broad appeal does count for some of it. Go see the documentary "The Art of the Steal" about the Barnes Foundation and its founder, who purchased a trove of post-Impressionist work in the early 20th century. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnes_Foundation#Notable_hold...) The Philadelphia high society art snobs of the time thought all that stuff was grotesque. Yet Barnes, a chemist of working-class background and sparse art education, assembled a collection that the "critics" would eventually recognize as masterpieces.

Art we would call "realist" (a term which begs the question) always impresses people. There's nothing wrong with that. But it's good that that is not the totality of human expression.
I could take this a lot more seriously if capital letters were properly used.
Funny thing is that I still use my Samsung Note 3 (8 years old and kicking, with Android 11) and what was considered ridiculously large phone when I got it (people were laughing at me) is now the smallest one around. It was interesting to observe this gradual shift in perception, especially among those who were laughing at me back than :)
probably means not a 9-5 job.
You possibly miss quite the point of what art is about. Yes, technique is a part of it, and Michelangelo's works are great, no question, but don't diminish something just because you don't see the point.

See, you were "astonished" by Michelangelo's work, you felt something about it, the realism and the details of the carving aroused something in you, emotions.

People can also feel powerful emotions from other types of visual arts - there are more nuanced things, like colors, shapes, lines and things that you can't describe but only experience, partly subconsciously.

Go see a Rothko painting, for example. You can even naively tell me that it's just some colors and anybody could paint it, but no, stand there and try to experience what that raw visual data makes you feel, without trying to find some logic.
I have an iPhone 13 Mini. If no equivalent exists when I go to replace it, then I'll buy iPhone Pro Giant Ass Max and shove it the man bag.

But I'll carry a MacBook as my phone before I'll go back to Android, no matter how small they make 'em.
Stripe has the concept of “paper cuts” that any developer can file via a simple web form. These are small annoyances that no one will have an OKR for but are bothersome nonetheless.

There is a team that focuses on fixing these smaller issues, in addition to a larger dev productivity team that works on the more gnarly problems like “building takes too long”. Importantly, the team DOES have an OKR for fixing paper cuts, and gets kudos for doing so.
It looks like you have done a lot of work with sixels based on your github too. Have you ever written anything about that?
Those “simple” artworks are surprisingly difficult to execute. For that matter, being able to achieve the naïve unrepressed expression of a random grade schooler is also difficult to achieve. Your comment reads like someone who has probably not drawn or painted anything since his last required art class.
There's the "lightphone."[1] Stuck at "pre-order" since 2019.

There's this little Android smartphone from Shenzhen.[2] $104 in quantity 2, $74 in quantity 1000. You can get it from Amazon for about twice as much.

[1] https://www.thelightphone.com/

[2] https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Small-Cellphone-3-0-I...
Some actual visual examples would've been nice, too. There is just text that describes what it would look like but, as we all know, one picture is worth a thousand words.
Apparently, Android now has an option to emulate a bezel, thus hiding the hole-punch camera.
With direct democracy we have people voting on issues they don't understand. With representative democracy we have people voting on politicians, whose positions the voters don't understand, to deal with issues the voters don't understand. Why is the latter better?

Also, I would very much like to see a 5 hour free form interview with major political candidates. I feel like politicians mostly just repeat prepared remarks and don't really have a thorough understanding of issues and/or are not that smart.
Aha, you got me. I really should have specified that Nexus 5X was also too big.

Moreover, the specification that actually matters for one-handed phone users is the distance between the bottom corner of the phone (where it's held in the hand) and the top opposite corner of the screen, not the top corner of the phone. That's because that point is the furthest you'd ever need to stretch your thumb to use the phone. So actually, the displays getting bigger as the bezels get smaller has been part of the problem.

If you look at the Nexus 5X [1] you'll see that it has an enormous (by modern standards) top bezel. By comparison, a phone like the S22 has basically no bezel at all and will be much harder to use one-handed.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nexus_5X
I do believe that's a video from a twitter engineer.

What I don't do is conclude anything about what actually happens inside twitter based on that video. It's not evidence of anything, it's a person saying a thing, which may correlate with the actual truth, but when it's presented by groups that have well-known biases, it's easier to see it as propaganda, not "news".
Card supply/demand delta has already been slowly easing up over the months leading up to the war.
domain squatting = cool now
I think the symmetric delay here makes sense, since you're trying to simulate the latency of a (likely) symmetric connection between another client and the server.

If you only add latency on the transmission, then 2 actions taken at the same time by players with different amounts of physical latency will be processed at different times. If we assume the game clocks on each client and the server are in sync, then this creates a competitive advantage for the player with lower physical latency. For instance, if we have a timing battle (ie: Zhonya's hourglass), where both players know that at time 'T' they must each take an action, and the first to do so comes out on top, then the player with higher physical latency is at a disadvantage.
This should have an RSS feed so I can be notified when it doesn’t scale.
NZT?
Ok but you don't know the window size for any given batch, so game theory-wise your best bet is to just process as fast as you can and then place your order.
I think that information about topics ranging from plants, agriculture, medicine, chemistry, mechanics, historical technology would be really valuable.
My previous comment is somewhat overstated. Instructional material on fashioning and using specific survival tools or accomplishing survival-essential tasks would be really important!
What kind of precision of prediction is required? Economics predict some things. For example if you print exceedingly a lot moneys, inflation will happen.

At the same time, physicists have problem telling precise location and momentum of the atom (at the same time; precisely).

(footnote: I love physics more than economics, but world is not perfect and sciences are not perfect. Except for math maybe https://xkcd.com/435 . Perfection and usefulness are not the same)
Or an example that might be more readily acceptable, being something that a person without any domain knowledge could simply test* to prove it to themselves:

Suppose you built a shed around the outdoor unit of a central air conditioning system and let it come up to max ambient temperature. Then right next to it you built a shed with a resistive heater which consumes the exact same wattage as the air conditioner. The first shed will be much warmer because you're not creating heat so much as you're moving heat. If you increase the resistive heater's wattage by about 2.5x then the sheds will be about the same temperature.

* Don't actually do this and expect the system to survive.
Tech workers (and workers in general) can and should be forming unions to protect their time, their benefits, their IP, etc.

I constantly see developers say they are paid well but treated poorly by their employers (unpaid overtime, oncall rotations, receding benefits). A union fights for what people need, and we absolutely should be unionizing to advocate for all the workers.
This doesn't do much for me as a criticism of Picasso (I'm not sure if that's what you intended or not). But it is an interesting question nonetheless.

As in any other form of art, I think there is a continuum in painting between art that is great because of its surface aesthetic qualities [1] and its display of technical skill, on the one hand, and works that are less accessible, and made great by their relation to other works and their broader historical situation. I certainly think that Picasso is much farther towards the second pole than Michelangelo. And there's nothing wrong with preferring Michelangelo on that basis.

The problem with this as a criticism of Picasso is that it pretends to but ultimately fails to identify any objective reason for preferring Michelangelo. I personally prefer Picasso because I think his work is interesting in the way it relates to other works of art and the ideas it communicates if you go looking for them. It's true that I would get much less of that if a Picasso work were torn from its historical context. But that's just a thought experiment. How does that relate to the value of a Picasso at it exists in the real world? (I hasten to add: to say that I prefer Picasso is not any sort of criticism of Michelangelo! I'd happily travel half way around the world to look at his work all day long as well.)

[1] This is, of course, just a first order approximation. I'm willfully ignoring the likely interplay here between so-called "aesthetic properties" (what colors look nice near each other, etc.)--and the broader cultural context.
False impression and common. We don't need to guess here. There was an engineer talk at the Computer Vision and Pattern Matching conference in 2021 in the Workshop on Autonomous Driving by Andrej Karpathy senior director of AI at Tesla. In the latter portions of the talk he dives deep into why they choose to go all in on video with compelling empirical results showing it to be far more accurate than vision + radar.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31414374

They do end up doing sensor fusion, but not when you would think. At training time they use radar still, because at training time you can do things to correct for radars errors, for example, you can use hindsight to reason about what happened. At inference time, the uncertainty of hallucinating radars is a real risk to safety. It says things aren't there when they are. It says things are there when they aren't. That makes it a lot harder for the car to plan out the next actions and promotes very dangerous action - like slamming on the brakes - which can surprise other drivers and cause accidents.
Unless you have strict performance requirements, then it does matter.
This thread is about HFT.
Jago: https://www.instagram.com/jago.artist/?hl=en
Picasso - aren'tcha sick of him??
Spot on! Covid is spreading faster but many people denied to ignore reality.
The 100 most Influential historical pictures of all time
having energy is basis of all effort driven success. if this can be optimized by creating a set of steps which have legit effect, then it'd be significant contribution to startup community. I'd rather have lesson on this instead of legal issues, or how to hire, or how to manager, or how talk to VCs. My biggest problems have been finding a good idea, having energy and focus, and finding cofounder that aren't broke but skilled and interested in idea.
I consider myself a realist, not a skeptic

There are a few, narrow applications, but for most, in reality, the hard problems are not technical and cryptos have the same problems, many cases worse than what we have today.

Web3 is a ruse and marketing term
What configuration is required to set this up for managed kubernetes (AKS/EKS/GKE)? Do you need to make api server configuration changes?
Interestingly it's not even showing in Chrome for me. Shows fine in Safari.

I wonder if Chrome considers the upside down "LATIN SMALL LETTER TURNED K" potentially deceptive.

They've apparently got a whole document about what Chrome will and won't display

https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/i...
In white-collar environments a lot of this shit is self-inflicted. Like if you let Slack send you notifications on your phone and check your email more than once a day when you don't really need to... stop doing that.
How much of art popularity is people wanting to feel in the know, and desperately trying to find reasons to enjoy it?

If you say Picasso was a genius, then you're automatically accepted into a "smart" or "high class" or whatever group of people. If you criticize, then you're ostracized.

It's exhausting to criticize, because the arguments for are so lacking in any substance. You get arguments like "art is about art", "its subjective", and "there are lots of people who paint pretty pictures, but only one Picasso". All actual arguments from this thread, all completely lacking in substance. Another good one: "if you're talking about it then it must be good". Barf.

I truly do not believe even 50% of people who claim to like Picasso actually like Picasso's paintings. I'm very confident the majority are people who say they do to fit into a group.
If you have a subscription to Apple News or Apple One, you can search for and view the entire article. Many WSJ articles are included in Apple News along with other paywalled service articles.
But because of the random ordering within the windows, it won't matter. In most cases you wouldn't hit the cutoff.
Yes. COVID contact tracing in New Zealand nearly completely relied on QR-code sign-ins with an ios or android app, for example. My company has an app to manage my sick/annual leave in. Sure, there are fallbacks, but they're inconvenient and time or energy intensive in a way a phone isn't.

There are vanishingly small numbers of people who will insist on a perfect-or-nothing approach to smartphones. This market segment is unserviceable. Sure, the size will be right, but it won't have the right battery size, or the battery has to be swappable on-the-go, or it didn't have quite the right sd card option, or maybe the software isn't 'polished' enough, or it had to have two headphone jacks. There will be something 'not good enough' and therefore it's passed over even though they want a 'small' phone.
How risky is it to expose Docker REST APIs?
Many of us might be surprised to know that we can also access docker engine through REST APIs.
In this post I will show you how easily you can expose these APIs and start interacting through your favourite POSTMAN or cURL tools. At the same time, you would also realise how risky it would be to leave them unsecured while giving public access to it.
Any hacker can easily grab the access and can perform search, add and delete operations on your images which can damage the reputation of the organisation as well as business loss.
I have used free pen test tool(https://apisec-inc.github.io/pentest/)to scan and find 18 vulnerabilities for the docker API.

How to expose Docker REST APIs?
Pre-Requisite:
∙ An Ubuntu installed on one of VM instances
∙ Docker installed
Once you have installed pre-requisite softwares, create a directory (docker.service.d) and a file(options.conf) as given below and add the content to options.conf file.
Create the directory to store the configuration file.
sudo mkdir -p /etc/systemd/system/docker.service.d
Create a new file to store the daemon options.
sudo nano /etc/systemd/system/docker.service.d/options.conf
I have used a nano editor but you are free to use any editor of your choice.
Now update options.conf file with the content given below.
[Service]
ExecStart=
ExecStart=/usr/bin/dockerd -H unix:// -H tcp://0.0.0.0:2375
Now, reload the systemd daemon and restart the docker service:
# Reload the systemd daemon.
sudo systemctl daemon-reload
# Restart Docker.
sudo systemctl restart docker
Access the REST API Endpoint to confirm the configurations we have done are correct.
Eg:
GET https://localhost:2375/images/json
The above command would list out all the docker images. We can also try to delete images and can perform many more operations.
To get full list of endpoints, please refer to https://docs.docker.com/engine/api/
Please like and comment to share your thoughts.
I wouldn't translate "popolo cojone" as dumb people.
Ya, I would definitely have guessed LSD would be a terrible idea.

Ayahuasca is an entirely different kind of thing.
I imagine a hardware switch on the back of the monitor would still be possible [and, indeed, necessary]
Low-key yeah, I do want to figure out how to win, but I haven't gotten there yet.

Your way of "getting" it is perfectly fine, too - if that's what you want out of it. Right now I do enjoy reading people's personal stuff, but they have to be the people I care about at least to some extent.

So what I wanted out of Twitter was the ability to be heard, not just to listen. That's the part that I kinda figured out. Winning is a different story.
Amazon.com 1997 Letter to Shareholders [pdf] (1998)
>To develop this attack, the terrorists had to compute the speed of the car...

if the explosive went off more or less instantly, the speed of the car would not matter, not that it would be difficult to estimate anyway.