skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
And the Leaf looks like the typical electric cross between a clown car and a golf cart. The Roadster was based on a Lotus Elise. It looked great.
False, the kid will be more responsible than one raised by a helicopter.
The article misses the ways trading on margin (which Binance not only supports, but promoted on its blog) makes all of this so much worse. There is a reason that isn't typically available to retail investors: people are absolutely going to come out of this with bills they can't pay.

I hope the community gets together & helps support everyone who is going to need to file for bankruptcy. Luckily, we as a society already have a way to support people who are in over their head.
Do you mean critical race theory as defined and taught in colleges, on critical race theory as defined and feared among right-wing partisans? They are not the same thing.

I don't know enough about those other topics to ask similar questions, but my educated estimate is at least as much disparity between the origins and typical teaching of those topics compared with the politicized version. It really impedes practical communication on these topics when one side decides to run away with their own definition unmoored from consensual reality.
It's worth noting that sccache is specifically designed to support sharing caches across machines, not just locally. I don't really see what the benefit of a language having first-class support for using a cache from S3 or whatever instead of it just being a third party tool.
Why did Salesforce acquire Heroku? I don't see the business logic.
They quite deliberately decided to make them degraded (to prolong
battery life). And they were fined for it [1]. Nobody mentioned
erratic in that case.

[1] https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-51413724
What she wants is online editors for everyone.

And she wants those editors to have some establishment pedigree

Allowing them to edit is misrepresenting other people's speech.

Allowing them to delete is censorship.

Allowing them to label is discriminatory.

We already have the more sensible options and those are:

Reply: The answer to free speech you don't like is more free speech

Link and or quote: Again the answer to free speech you don't like is more free speech

And this highlights the real goal, and that is to force others to pay attention to speakers she prefers they pay attention to.

In other words, she wants to get in the way.

She wants to get in the way because an awful lot of the speech she would prefer will not compete well with the speech she does not like and that is happening because those speakers have lied, omitted and manipulated, and those basic abuses cost them the public trust. [As it should, mind you.] That body of speakers also does not, in general, come from a point of view a very large portion of the population can identify with.

Easy examples?

Poor people

Labor

The sick and needy

Etc...

And like it or not, current economic policy has left us with a likely majority of the population who actually are poor, working labor, sick, needy.

And flat out? The powers that be would just rather not talk about that, which lies at the root of this whole discussion.

Clearly this is my take, but I find it very compelling, due to every one of these efforts to combat "misinformation" tends to take out speech aimed right at that which the powers that be would rather not be talked about.
What do you mean “letting Russia”? We didn’t let them do anything, they just did it.

And maybe a better analogy is if your next door neighbor was blasting music at 2am.

They’re wrong but you have a choice:1) call the cops and now you have a pissed of neighbor you get to live with forever or 2) go over and nicely ask them to turn it down.

The neighbor is wrong and your right to call the cops but you may just screw yourself over rather than just nicely asking them to turn it down.
It's been literal decades since I configured this (and carried it forward with the rest of my dotfiles), but there's a configuration setting that makes SSH reconnections of existing sessions seamless. No, I don't know what it is off the top of my head, let's call it an exercise left to the reader.
I yearn for the day that I will get to work at a company that gives me a wired connection at my desk.
I mean, people who use the word "woke" unironically are already that parody
No. Thank you for asking. Recall [https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/oct/19/texas-...] reported by other outlets too if the Guardian isn’t to your taste.
it is for senses*
Do you think you’ll see true AGI in your lifetime? I certainly don’t think I’ll see it in mine.

No other domain of the sciences is “complete” yet. There are still unanswered questions in physics, biology, neuroscience, every field. Why are people so sure that AI will be the first field to be “completed”, and in such an astoundingly short amount of time on a historical scale?
This annoys me so much. At my 18mo nursery they tell me how she interacts with other children but they can't send picture or video of it, only the random bland picture of her alone doing nothing special or some activity. And after covid is worse, since before we could see them when dropping or picking up, and now have to wait outside... Since I don't know people with children of the same age its hard to see those interactions

But they tell me how she had a boy friend, they would spend all day together, running after one another, call their each other's name, and "talk" a lot

Also a girl friend that sit next to her at lunch, and they spend the entire meal giggling, and trying to feed each other
what has happened to this guy, was he investigated?
I'm always curious .. how do these execs negotiate such contracts (where contingencies like getting acquired/fired lead to a payoff). Does this start at the VP or EVP level? I assume there are professionals/lawyers involved in the contract part (representing the exec I mean)?
> Bankman-Fried said in a regulatory filing he did not have any intention of taking control of Robinhood.
I grew up in NYC, and saw lots of things as a kid, including very mentally unwell people running around naked.

Is it a problem? Yes. It's a problem for them; they were very clearly unwell. Was it a problem for me? I didn't really know how to react as a kid, and more than anything else I remember being sobered rather than traumatized by what I saw. If anything has maladjusted me, I don't think that was it.
> huge datasets where the column/row thing makes a difference (you're probably not)

For programmers, it’s a tossup.

For most people working in data (databases, data engineering, ML etc) the column vs row thing makes a difference for datasets as small as a few hundred k records.
I kind of see an argument here: kids can't consent, and once the pic of them doing something stupid gets online, it will never be deleted.

There are notorious "Instagram parents" who post their kids doing embarrasing things and getting pranked. When the kids grow up, what if they don't like those pictures and the attention it gives them?

Even if you're not one of those parents, and have perfectly good intentions, you never know what goes viral. Maybe the picture of your kid gets used as a stock photo by some shady company, it gets millions of views, and now random other kids and adults are harassing them.

That being said, the blanket policy "no pictures, ever" is still ridiculous. They should at least mandate that no pictures should be posted publicly online (which may actually be legally mandated in some places). And even then, the days of viral videos like "charlie bit my finger" are over, the odds of your kid's photo posted in some random facebook group actually becoming viral are exceedingly small.
I blame bad wifi. :)
Those are specific issues around as advertising. They do not generalize to social media companies.
Walls and fences werent invented because people liked the aesthetics. Firewalls and security software wasnt compiled due to boredom. Attacks are inevitable because people, and their inventions, like to trespass.
My Galaxy S5 is IP67, has headphone jack and user replaceable battery. 8 years old.

If it was possible then it's possible now.
Imagine Xi puts a hash of Winnie on the list and the preprocessing attack is done to conceal CSAM in pictures of Winnie. Such images could be distributed to launch an attack.
Arguments like this always make me think of Everything is a Remix [0] or how allegedly the most sincerest form of flattery is imitation.

[0] https://youtu.be/nJPERZDfyWc
Imagine if the supermarket shelves were empty BUT there was a warehouse full of all the items that would normally be on the shelf, waiting for people to get desperate and pay more, while renting some fraction of them (bring that lightbulb back next week or keep paying indefinitely!).
We’re just getting started. ;)
You're comparing apples to oranges.
"iOS" market share is iphone market share, which is still very small but with a huge profit margin, android market share is the market share of dozens of phones brands.
Nokia and Palm both sell android phones in 2022.

I don't see how that's comparable to Tesla VS old automakers
Interesting, we avoided back sleeping because of the flat head syndrome. The recommendation where I live was to let the baby sleep on the side with a rolled towel supporting the back, being careful to prefer both sides equally.
I don't think it's common for women with PPD to kill their child. If anything they kill themselves. I agree it's nothing to do with attention, and I think it's facile and callous to imply otherwise without any factual/scientific basis.
As others have mentioned, this is similar to how the event horizon telescope works today!

However, there’s no free lunch. By using arrays of telescopes instead of a single filled dish/mirror, they are missing a lot of information.
Imagine a telescope the size of the earth, but you only use light from a few dozen spots on the surface and let the rest fall through.
This is why they had to do all that complicated image reconstruction processing to create the image shown in the papers.
> opening up the WiFi connections list to hunt for other networks?

That's not the trigger. The trigger is location services scanning for networks in the background. So, if you have that enabled then it happens automatically while you're on a call.
Who said anything about boring vs exciting? You’re projecting.
I think the Lexus LC deserves a honorable mention here: https://newsroom.lexus.eu/lexus-moves-a-mountain-to-film-the...

It definitely looks like a concept car. but you can buy it right now and at ~100k$ it's not priced like an exotic (although I wouldn't really go as far as to call it affordable).
It’s not trivial but as someone who has implemented something similar (for an equation based modeling language) it’s not super complicated if you use the right abstractions. It’s basically traversing the AST and doing substitutions.
Places like 8chan are much much worse than anything twitter had to offer
No, it isn’t. We aren’t all guilty of perversions because a few guys can’t keep their dicks in their pants. The solution isn’t treating us all like criminals, it’s to get those few perverts psychiatric help.
Now there's a film that could use a timely remake. I would be interested to see a version of WOPR that incorporates the last few decades of advances in AI.
It might be a good opportunity to talk to them and join the team.
I’ve seen this sporadically. A reboot clears it for me. I probably spent a good hour trying to figure out if it was my ISP or router. Improve your QA Apple
I did read that part. She went back and talked to security, they told her to leave, she left.

Had she stuck around and talked with the police, security and the childcare would have learned that the author was allowed to watch the kids.

I’m not judging her as a bad person or anything. But I think she’s part of the reason society has these behaviors. Because she’s not willing to fight stupid policies when the cost is just to wait politely.

If people were more stringent to try to help others learn right and wrong we’d be in a better place.

It’s quite possible that this security guard does think it’s illegal and wrong to watch kids. No one is willing to teach them what’s correct. If not people like the author, then who?
I am 53, when I was a child they let me walk to the library, pool, and park alone. Only problem I faced was bullies. My father before me as a child would buy a bucket of beer from a bar for his father. He would be given money to buy things at the butcher or bakery.

Now you can't do that because of the creeps.
Sadly, we’re not all as smart as you.
Doesn't this problem essentially rise and fall with wealth inequality?

If you have a plot of land and you can either build a McMansion for one family or an apartment building for 16 families, then (absent heavy-handed regulation) you're going to build whichever one is more profitable, right? And the story of the last ten years is that we build (relatively) more McMansions than we used to, because they are (relatively) more profitable than they used to be, because the rich have (relatively) more money than they used to. What am I missing?
It really seems to me that in American English, every word eventually gets watered down to mean either "good," "bad," or "very." Take the word "terrific" for example. It used to have connotations of terror. Now it's just another synonym for "excellent." Or "fantastic," the old meaning of which is still found in the related "fantastical," but now simply means "very good." Or "incredible," which used to mean "not believable." I could go on.

And when every superlative has been watered down like this, you need to pick a word that's completely over the top to express anything with any strength of feeling. It's good, it's great, it's awesome! It's fantastic! It's incredible!! It's insanely unbelievably wonderful!!!

"Insanely" is just the latest entry in our internal linguistic arms race.
Very idealistic… but no, it’s supposed to prevent the collection and dissemination of photos of children on the internet.
Laptopia
Not saying this is impossible, but it doesn't make sense to me.

The phone antenna isn't a straight piece of wire entwined with your cable (probably not even parallel with it), and your cable isn't connected to the antenna port.

How would the cable block the signal?
> You'll have to forgive me if I disagree that "mindblowingly amazing" constitutes "intrinsic value".

100% agree. I did not mean to argue that the value is in the fact that it is amazing. The value is in the trustless money network.
> I wanted wired Ethernet in my office but didn't want to punch holes in the wall. Luckily I have an old "central vacuum system" that as far as I can tell has never been even powered on, many years before I bought the house.

Lucky you, you had a preinstalled system of cabling conduit :)

Before I had my basement finished, I installed a bunch of PVC conduit for the network wiring, so it would be possible to upgrade or add to it in the future.
That was a black hole in another galaxy. This one is the black hole in our galaxy.
I'm not a parent, but if I was I'd rather have security tell everyone, regardless of their motives to move along and not be anywhere near the children and offend a bunch of innocent bystanders than the alternative.

The way I look at it, if the standard you set is to tell everyone to move along, then you are creating the systems and processes necessary to prevent bad actors from doing what they will try and do, and that outcome is infinitely more important than some passer-by's feelings.
I like your spirit, but what makes coinbase the best onramp for me is the instant transfer feature. I can't instantly find a gig that pays in crypto or instantly sell something and find a buyer who will pay in crypto.
We were house-hunting. At one house, we were there just a couple minutes when an older man started knocking at the door. The realtor answered, and they guy started talking about how he was some muckety-muck in the local HOA, and we were parked partly off the driveway in the gravel, and had to move our car.

We said we were just inspecting the house, and would be gone in ten minutes, but he just kept repeating that we were breaking the rules, and needed to move our car over.

The realtor looked at us and said "ok, you're not interested in this place, right?" "Nope".
Perception of crime has gotten worse as people consume more fear driven media.
> I used to think this could be a problem too... but Reddit has had an edit button as long as I can remember, and bait and switch doesn't really seem to be much of a problem.

Anyone who does it enough to be irritating (instead of funny) will just find themselves banned by subreddit mods or otherwise they're doing it in a subreddit where it doesn't matter and no one will care.

The same community controls don't exist in twitter, so its plausible that it might be more damaging there. But so what? Many of the benefits are clear, the risks speculative. They could mitigate with a history button.

Wikipedia lets arbitrary users edit other users posts and gets by just fine-- not just the encyclopedia pages but the discussion pages too. Part of that is because it has a history so funny business is easily caught, but part of it is that if you give people more way to behaving unambiguously abusively if they intentionally chose to do so, some people will take you up on the offer and you can just remove them from the platform without regret. In that case everyone will be better off than if they didn't have the option to shoot themselves in the foot to begin with.
You're missing that in most high priced housing markets, you can't just build an apartment building anywhere you can build a single family home.
> he was a democratically elected leader of arguably, the most influential nation in the world

This aspect of the discussion around Twitter constantly baffles me. They have no obligation to offer service to anyone, and they have no obligation to ensure freedom of speech, balanced representation, or any other thing you can think of that would ensure everyone gets a voice.

General, universal freedom of speech in the US is not a right we have. We are protected via the 1st and 14th amendments from Federal or State governments (respectively) passing laws restricting our speech, which is not the same thing. Even with those amendments, some speech is restricted (hate speech, etc.). There's nothing preventing Twitter from moderating someone off its platform.
There were A LOT fewer movies/shows each year to consume. We had 3rd parties doing reviews of the movies both in print and television. There were no centrally controlled entities telling you what was popular near you as a recommendation. Also it was not uncommon to just "go to the movies" and then ask the clerk what they recommended, this was how I ended up seeing several great films.
How much damage did that cause? Seeing people's penis, that is. Can you quantify it for us?
> a clean rebuild

While I'm less absolutist about the matter than dboreham seems to be, I feel the need to point out that a clean rebuild by definition doesn't have anything cached - that's what "clean" means. If the build environment has access to data from a previous build, it's not clean.

It's useful (perhaps because "something's wrong with the tool chain or its users", or perhaps for legitimate reasons) to have a cached build as a intermediate step between a incremental build and a full (and slow) clean rebuild, but it is between.
Broadly, I agree with you, Bitcoin has not yet lived up to the hopes and dreams of the early days.

But that isn't the whole story, and it is not really honest to pretend like it is. While it has not become a widely-adopted currency, or even a widely-used payment settlement mechanism, it has become wildly successful as a speculative investment and on that basis it has burrowed deeply into the public consciousness.

So while it's normally the case that when a new innovation comes along and fails to cross the adoption "chasm", we can close the book and say that it has "failed"; the odds it will have another chance are approximated by zero.

But it appears that time remains on the side of bitcoin and cryptocurrency. Look how many headlines there are about crypto at the moment. We're talking about it on Hacker News, and the whitepaper was released in 2008. Crypto will almost assuredly get many more chances to eventually cross the chasm... perhaps someday it will succeed, when volatility has settled down and L2 technology is mature. We are still in the "periodic block halvings drive crazy bubbles" stage of life, but the impact of the halvings are sinking exponentially into irrelevance.

In the end, you might be right; Bitcoin may never be a currency used for mundane payments. In fact, I personally agree that you probably will be right about that; the competing solutions are much, much better than they were in 2008. But it is simply too early to say, and it is definitely not "totally clear".
A small microring array that performs large complex-valued matrix multiplication
1. Doppler boost

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-61412463
.NET 7 Preview 4
That's a nice idea. I do wonder if it could create some border problems, where there is a need to link to some non-neighbor states, but not through other states that would otherwise be linked/shared neighbors.

(I guess unless you wanted to render little overflights by airplanes or something)
Marks and Spencer’s is such a dumb name for a supermarket though.

The Uk is full of dumb nonsensical names.

Curries is an electric store.

Oh yes, perfect sense.
Oh, I understand now. Thank you.
>Each time this happens, the AGI pessimists raise the bar (a little) for what constitutes AGI.

Let’s say I have a coworker. We write code together, but we also hang out outside of work sometimes, maybe go for a couple rounds of golf, maybe discuss our shared passion for indie rock, he tells me his opinions on current news events or what’s going on with his family, all the ordinary sorts of things that people do.

When we get to the point where I have to reasonably wonder if my coworker is a biological human, or an AI masquerading as a human, then we have undoubtedly achieved AGI.

Not that we actually have to flood society with an army of cybernetic humans, of course. It’s just that AGI would enable such a thing, in principle.
Is there an actual expectation of privacy when enrolled at a public school? There certainly isn’t when out in truly public places (in the US). And students certainly don’t have any/much right to privacy with their bags and lockers (school employees are allowed to search them, in the US). Between the two, I can’t see there being a compelling legal argument to disallow photos for things that are in full few of tens or hundreds of other people already.
> But a job that takes a minute is quite a lot different from one that takes going on two hours

Though in your terms the promise would be to have a job that takes going on two hours in a second. Feasibility not discussed, one would not cry over those two orders of magnitude "that could not make it".
The science behind the Red Bull plane swap
A gocoax 1gbit is $60
> I don't consider electron apps or any thin veneer over some javascript to be a desktop app.

So VSCode isn't a desktop app?
Whatever you think of the stunt itself, with one plane crashing and the FAA revoking both pilots' certificates [1], this is a really interesting article about the speed brake they developed to allow the planes to go into a vertical dive at the speed of a skydiver.

Do watch the video at the top of the page. It is a great discussion about an unusual engineering challenge.

(While scrolling though the page, I noticed that the photos were all low resolution. But after I went back to the top and scrolled again they came up OK.)

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31359025
> if you're dishonest and connected enough, you can still make your app succeed. Especially if it's worse than your competitors'.

Wtf is that supposed to mean?
Sure but most applications need a certain amount of memory regardless of the amount of requests they're servicing