skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If they did that they would get sued by their own investors.
ASML is a fantastic business to own but has a price tag to match. Intel might be good and is selling for a song.
You can't live in an NFT. But buying a house with crypto right now is risky and expensive. We handle legal and compliance to quickly turn your crypto into a strong, all-cash offer to the seller - with no additional fees.
Teslas forward P/E, which is way more indicative of the future of the company, is 51:
https://finbox.com/NASDAQGS:TSLA/explorer/pe_fwd#:~:text=Tes....

I admit Q2 will be lower than Q1, but Q4 this year will likely see an even lower forward P/E if price remains the same.

Sure, they could be overvalued, I'm just trying to explain why it's valued as it is for those that think it's "insane".

Mercedes hovers around 5 because many investors believe they could go bankrupt if they can't successfully transition to EVs. GM, for example, will very likely go bankrupt (again). Many others as well.
But it does matter what percentage of users advertisers believe are bots.
I was a backer and have received mine, thanks for all of the hard work! I am curios, now that you have the tooling and partnerships established, what is the turn around on a new wave of flippers?
>I'm not sure why they have to be mutually exclusive.

Because resources, will, people, etc. are finite.

>Some people are good at research and some people are good at politics.

The use of research is dictated by people good at politics (and bad as persons).
Looking at some of the prediction markets has some ideas: https://www.metaculus.com/questions/7439/u-s-interest-rate-p...
This article reads like a 14 year old who is mad at society for the first time in their life.

"That website is made by a company worth 14 Billion with a B!" There are around 1000 companies with a Billion or greater market cap. Is this supposed to be a criticism?
Their use might be economically efficient but it seems like it isn’t ecologically sustainable.
The rumor is, the FSB (previously known as KGB) had been given funding after 2014 to bribe Ukrainian military officers to insure little resistance. Then, the FSB (thinking there was no way an invasion of Ukraine would actually happen) pocketed the money intended for bribes, and told Putin the bribes had been accepted. Thinking the Ukrainian top officers were all corrupt, he told the military there would be little resistance.

A long line of tanks on a road is a nice show of strength if all you expect is unorganized and ill-equipped civilian resistance.

Of course, we have no way of knowing if this rumor is true, at least not for now. It would also explain the many arrests of FSB agents so far this year.
That is indeed the big question. The court case would go on for a long time, and in the meantime they'd be in this weird limbo and the business would suffer.

What we're really seeing here is: can a very rich person completely flout a contract, ignore legal obligations he signed, and abuse the legal system to the point that contracts are basically unenforceable against him? Sure, he has no case, and there is no real conventional legal way to wiggle out of this, but that's not really the question, is it?

As Matt Levine said in his column today, a merger arb told him that "if you're reading the contract, you've already lost."

In all likelihood, it seems the most probable outcome is a modest adjustment of purchase price to further "secure the deal" (whatever that means). But Musk is a bit crazy, so while that's the most likely outcome, it's hard to say it with much confidence.
I don't mean to be snarky but we're talking about the same company that shut down Vine and let TikTok happen. Their decision making has been baffling.
Of course they didn't write it that specifically. That would be extraordinarily silly. One writes the clause to be as general as possible, while also covering the primary concern. Witness, page 25:

> Section 4.7 Information Supplied. None of the information supplied or to be supplied by or on behalf of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries expressly for inclusion or incorporation by reference in the proxy statement relating to the matters to be submitted to the Company’s stockholders at the Company Stockholders’ Meeting (such proxy statement and any amendments or supplements thereto, the “Proxy Statement”) shall, at the time the Proxy Statement is first mailed to the Company’s stockholders and at the time of the Company Stockholders’ Meeting to be held in connection with the Merger, contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading at such applicable time, except that no representation or warranty is made by the Company with respect to statements made therein based on information supplied, or required to be supplied, by Parent or its Representatives in writing expressly for inclusion therein. The Proxy Statement will comply as to form in all material respects with the provisions of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
Should we be able to chart a consistent course on issues where there is no broad agreement among the people? Should the government involve itself in such issues at all, rather than leaving highly controversial purposes to be accomplished by voluntary means?
I've never wanted something so badly I've ordered about 6 months back!
They are monopolies/oligopolies with pricing power. That is the reason.
Re-read the list of topics that person provides. They are all authentically covered in a single no pre-reqs course. I took an 'Intro To Digital Logic" course a couple years ago hence my confidence about this.
ISOs worked out well for me. It wasn't a huge windfall, but the preferential tax treatment is actually quite nice.

Really the best strategy is ISOs that convert to NSOs with 10y exercise windows when you leave. best of both worlds.
Why are they gatekeeping? To protect people from themselves.

The SEC has a pretty ill defined set of risks they are trying to protect people from. People will find ways to lose their money if they don't have a general "wait, do I have a clue what I'm doing here?" filter.
It would be political, for sure, but it still might be informative to see who claims credit for which part.
So can ordinary alcohol. And I would prefer the alcohol.
Context is everything. In an economic discussion, one would use the economic meaning.
I guess I think the i3 doesn't count since its only a 34hp engine so it can't really power the car in normal driving (without sitting and letting the battery recharge for a while) its just a range extender but yes it is technically a series hybrid. It also has pretty poor efficiency using gas (31 mpg combined)

The Nissan e-power is interesting, having not dug deep into it before, it looked like it obviously had a engine to wheel connection through the transfer case. Thought they where pulling a Chevy and claiming series hybrid when actually parallel, but just digging deeper its very strange the engine output and drive gear are separated only by MM as though they where leaving the design open to a mechanical connection. Never the less its difficult to get highway MPG numbers on it which is why most hybrids have a mechanical connection. Electric is more efficient stop and go city driving while steady state highway mechanical transfer is more efficient. Would like to see power loss numbers and highway mpg, my guess is on the highway the E-Power would lose out to a Prius.
I think by the time you're saying "my system depends on the people in it being honest and competent" you've kind of already lost. Some people are competent, most aren't. Many people are honest, but some aren't. You aren't going to change that so you have to be resilient to it.
It's rather silly to assume the clause would be written that narrowly. I replied above with what would likely be a relevant clause, which covers any and all information supplied by Twitter.
90's was complete green fields, it's all been very overcrowded since the dot com recovery but I still agree
you can slide right on comment tile to reply! also slide left to see all the parents without scrolling all the way up.
I know of people who build a microprocessor in SimuLink.
That's nonsense. It's approaching the price of an arturia polybrute. You don't get a lot for the money - it was overpriced before this new model, now its just obscene.
And why do they do that and their 'siblings' don't?
I think we can both agree that neither Western propaganda nor Russian propaganda (that site you just linked) are going to be super helpful for getting a holistic view of the situation.
It's not his job to reduce homelessness or slow climate change. Dedicate your energy to getting your elected representatives to do their jobs. They have orders of magnitude more money and power.
>There is, believe it or not, an IMAX theater right outside of Zion that shows movies of the park.

There's one in Tusayan on the way to the South Rim of the Grand Canyon, as well.
I received mine recently, and I’ve been consistently impressed at both the build quality and overall attention to detail. I know many Kickstarter projects (and hardware startups in general) end up aggressively compromising on features and construction to meet deadlines and cut down on BOM costs, so I was very pleased to see no evidence of that with the Flipper Zero. It’s one of those products where you can immediately tell that a very passionate team invested a ton of time and took special care with the engineering and design process.
You're making a category error. The legal team is not the product team.
This looks really interesting! I like seeing more domain specific IDEs coming out
Redirects to archive.ph for some reason:

https://archive.ph/qziMw
Could you elaborate on the mathematical causes?
Israeli construction tech unicorn hopes to transform home building
Small productivity drains on minority portions of the task are not a requirement of doing the job. Software developers generally spend more time thinking than typing. Typing is not the bottleneck of the job (at least for the vast majority of roles).
In a bull market you get things for cheap, with the expectation that the bull market will end long enough before your retirement that those assets will increase in value. You basically bought those assets at a discount. Bonus!

Closer to retirement, you wouldn't want to take on that much risk, so you'd move (over time, as you get closer to retirement) to more stable investments. Target-date mutual funds[0] do this automatically.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Target_date_fund
Why would Musk have to pay if the government blocks the deal? It's not like it's an out - he's legally prohibited at that point.
Yes, correct. Aka net income. I was asking because the original commenter was claiming Tesla earnings were higher than Toyota which is far from true.
they have a lot of tlds
Yes, my bad, it was operating income that was higher for Tesla.
Lost’ Picasso spotted in Imelda Marcos’s home after son’s election win
Ty very much! We're glad we're adding value.
For a general guide to our pricing, check out https://www.mailchannels.com/pricing/. There isn't a way yet to send authenticated mail via the Cloudflare-oriented API; however, that will come. Paid users will get access to our console, click tracking, open tracking, priority support, etc.
> Comparing a trace from our driver to a trace from Metal, looking for any relevant difference, we eventually stumble on the configuration required to make depth buffer flushes work.

> And with that, we get our bunny.

So what was the configuration that needed to change? Don't leave us hanging!!!
I'm getting an error opening the page, but according to title and uploader, this might be video version of it:
https://youtu.be/S-da7O4d_Jw
This behavior is thought to be innate, which by definition is considered to be not learned behavior but preprogrammed into DNA. Consider a plant titling towards the sun.
I understand you can clone rfid security tags and nfc payment cards with this? Is it legal?
https://archive.ph/C02CL
There is no such thing as default infrastructure if you care if your application works. Hiring "experts" later is really just hiring someone to do what the developer should have done, and will probably have to ask the dev to do more work anyway. To an Ops person it's literally a black box. To "fine-tune" the infrastructure, they have to interrogate the developer, and learn only the bare minimum of whatever app stack the developer decided to use. The end result is literally black box reverse engineering, which is wasteful and leads to bad outcomes.

Imagine being a fashion designer making clothes without ever seeing a human being put them on. There's fabric that covers skin, and there's arm holes and leg holes and buttons, so they are "feature-complete" clothes. But just because you pinned up a bunch of fabric on a dummy doesn't mean you know what a person looks like when they put it on and move around in it, or whether a person will want to wear them, or if they'll fall apart after a week. You have to know about different body shapes, how bodies move, evaluate their fit, adapt them to the wear and tear of the real world, and be interested in the outcome. You don't have to be a medical doctor, and you don't have to be an engineer, but you do need to know the absolute minimum of how those different domains interact with clothing.
> Many years ago I had all the symptoms of CFS but specifically in my case it turned out to be insulin resistance from eating a Standard American Diet for too long.

I should probably check this out. I’m skinny as shit but eat enough sugar to probably slump me over soon.
At least one reason it matters is the gigantic numbers poison public discussion of wealth. People commonly claim things like Musk can single-handedly end world hunger because he has enough net worth to buy everyone food for the next 20 years. That isn't true if there is no way for him to liquidate enough of that worth without destroying the worth in the process. What these people actually can do is give away equity shares to the poor, but you can't buy food with equity shares. Or, in Bezos case, since he owns Whole Foods, I guess he can just give away food.
Appropriate more funds, yes, but more importantly: Fix procurement. This is where there real down-in-the-trenches work needs to happen. Fix every single agency's approach to software procurement, one by one, until the entire federal government is properly incentivized to fund high quality FOSS software for the long haul.

It's a little better than it used to be with FedRAMP and such. But even now, agencies are still relying on broken-by-design contracts for terrible proprietary software.
> a stupid bald c** and threatened to deck me

The "harassment" part makes sense at least.

> and it related to the claimant’s sex

I'd have assumed "sexual" meant relating to sex (intercourse), rather than relating to sexes (male/female).

I think the relevant act would be: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/section/26
> Is there some kind of politics more important for corporate decision making than claiming the $20bn or so you're entitled to by contract?

Corporate politics are politics like any other. They're very complicated.

https://www.engadget.com/musk-twitter-lawsuit-florida-pensio...
"Savage Department, Randy speaking."

For serious though you hit the nail square. Pearl-clutching suburban types are actually moving back into the city where I'm at (to my neighborhood, among others), and it sucks in every way except my house's value is shooting up.
And then the ngate take on it.
Love the open-source approach. Congrats! Great product
Actually you kind of can't. You don't have a legal basis for forcing the company to run that experiment.
The industry I'm referring to is the HR industry, and this term is used all over the place when discussing employment and recessions.

No harm or shame in not knowing it--lucky 10,000 and all that--but taking a chance to learn over blaming others would be my choice.
> So I think with this bike when you take off from a stop, you just squeeze the throttle or whatever controller it has and take off using battery power.

As they are German, I think that's not the case (if they want to be classified as an eBike). To be classified as an eBike it needs to work in "pedal assistance" mode. That is, you can't have a throttle/button/whatever, the engine only starts if you are pedaling.
It is basically true for sellers markets, because it gives more advantage to the seller. being a sellers market doesn't make it an irrational housing market.

During a buyers market, prices usually approach the list or go under.

This reflects the fact there is how much the house is worth to the seller, and how much it is worth to the buyer, and neither of these are the sale price.
> What happens if people don't kill The Sleeper? Does it go back to sleep? Is the server thus ruined to play on?

You can't normally kill the sleeper, that was never the intent.

The "normal" event is that it kills everyone in the zone, goes from the Sleeper's Tomb to Skyshrine killing everyone, kills Yelinak (the boss of Skyshrine), then it disappears forever (until a much later extension brought it back).

I think the only zone that's permanently changed is the Sleeper's Tomb: the warders don't spawn anymore, meaning their loot (which is the end-game loot of Velious) becomes unavailable. This is what makes waking the sleeper a dick move on Project 1999 servers: progression stops at Velious, so it locks all other players out of that gear (on "official" servers waking the sleeper after having farmed the warders might frustrate the second and third guilds for some time as they'd miss out on getting that gear while #1 would be working and farming Luclin).
I’ve bitten the bullet, but using an adapter is still suboptimal in two ways:

- you can’t charge your phone and listen to music at the same time.

- it’s really easy to loose the adapter, especially if you use your headphones on other devices that still have the jack.
> The comp is actually more like $20M/year if stock price doesn't tank.

I feel like a lot of people are missing the "stock price doesn't tank" part. How much he actually gets is going to pend on the value of the stock at the time. With the way things are going I wouldn't be surprised (even if it's just this year) his take home ends up being significantly less given AMZN is down 30+% since last year.
> Notice how the author has provided absolutely zero evidence to justify their claim.

That is true and unfortunate, but it is easy to find evidence that cleaning up header files will decrease compilation times: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YdIfz+LMewetSaEB@gmail.com/T/

>> Name an economically successful communist country.
> China.

Except that China’s success has mostly come by instituting a “Special Economic Zone” where a lot of the normal communist rules don’t apply, and then gradually relaxing the rules elsewhere as well. Just the fact that China allows individuals to start and run businesses is a huge break from communism.
Pocket lint also exists. Does that prove the success of pocket lint?
Or you're in the San Francisco Bay Area.
> I really don’t understand this comment. You think the Twitter legal team are so dumb to not have negotiated an agreement in their own favour?

Oh, the agreement is absolutely in Twitter's favor if Musk pulls out of the deal.

But that doesn't mean *suing Musk* to complete the deal is actually their best move. As usual, the best move is probably some kind of plea-agreement (or starting to sue to get into the position of a plea-bargain), where the details are figured out.

---------

There's really no "political benefit" to forcing Elon Musk to become the new owner of Twitter. There's a lot of room for creativity here. Maybe Twitter manages to extract a $2 billion concession or $5 billion concession from Musk (rather than the limited $1 Billion in the deal, since that only applies to very restrictive terms)

Or maybe Twitter just bans Elon Musk from their platform for wanton trolling and collects the $1 Billion. Who knows?

Just because Twitter's Board is legally allowed to do X, doesn't mean that they will do X. They will use X to threaten Musk into doing Y (and Y is what they really want). I'm not sitting in Twitter's Board of Directors right now, I don't know what their "Plan Y" is. But I have reason to believe that X (ie: forcing Musk to buy Twitter at $54.20) isn't in their best interest.
Nearly half a century after The Mythical Man Month, we still don't know how to manage software development except by throwing money at it. And the scale of software is limitless in the amount of code, complexity, and technical debt that can be added. Management can't guess which parts of software are adding value, rather than collecting rent. The principal-agent problem looms large.

In contrast, the scale, and thus the complexity and cost, of embedded tends to be limited by physical constraints.
Shaving my head now
That isn't true. Otherwise when the wheels come off (recession/depression) then the market would never recover as it's "just a Ponzi scheme". there is real value in the market and until some communist or anarchist can provide a reasonable solution that doesn't depend on the general human being altruistic 100% of the time I'll just keep going with the market and count on avarice. I'll trust in the general sense of fairness that most humans seem to have even if they aren't altruistic.
I'm not sure any of those prove he is a genius (SD>>4 say). Why does every successful person have to be a super intelligent person? None of the quotes, the interviews I've heard, etc put beyond what I would expect of a reasonably intelligent engineer. Engineering/Science/Math attract "geeks" sometimes with frightening Jeopardy levels of breadth in general science/engineering/etc fields.

And given all the batsh*t crazy, conjecture, etc one hears from him, i'm inclined to believe its less unstable genius, more lucky nerd. That doesn't mean he isn't smart/driven/etc, it just means he isn't this big brain who can predict the future and knows the secret formula to living on mars. In some ways the successes are logical steps. AKA, the tesla manufacturing problems, translate to knowing how to avoid similar issues when building rockets. Most of what has been accomplished looks like well applied engineering, which is more about sweat than genius. So from the outside it looks more like a mix of gambling + luck + solid management skills + ability to avoid technical dead ends. Does that make him a genius, or just someone with tenacity? Given the failures and close calls, I'm included to believe its less genius, more tenacity and just enough luck. Both tesla and space-X have been one bad day away from not existing. The fact that they are still around is luck as much as skill.
In 3 words, the medieval warm period. It has been suggested as the reason settlers were able to get the initial foothold.

The island's lowlands were also densely covered in birch forest when discovered in the late 800s, so there was plenty of wood to be had which would have helped.

Grazing animals would have had an easy time, as can be seen with the size of the sheep population and the deforestation effect they had on the island. The wool produced was a big part of how the settlers survived winter.
>If that isn't accurate I bet you it allows them out of the breakup fee.

Not really. There's nothing in the deal contingent on this and Twitter has no fiscal or regulatory responsibility to report which accounts are fully human or not human. Having APIs and allowing bots shows that Twitter is open about having bot accounts.
Using industry jargon is usually not a good idea outside of the industry. Readers are happy to learn, but you have to teach them first. This is why most newspapers at least provide the unabbreviated phrase on first usage, and give the abbreviation in parentheses, i.e. "Reduction in Force (RIF)". It's not safe to just assume everyone already knows everything you know.