skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The premise of the ad seems quite funny to me. It’s like they wanted to include the thing figuring out the patterns (I was a little impressed to see Q1, Q2, etc, but it would be nice to see it roll over to the next year as Q1 not Q5) but they somehow ended up with the excel-using businessman seeming to make up(?) some numbers for an important report and then project them linearly which doesn’t feel like the best message ever. Though they probably didn’t have enough time for someone to do a better job of modelling (if someone were doing it very quickly they probably couldn’t explain or show off drag and drop or toolbar buttons).
Oh so that's why we're having thunderstorms the next couple days :(
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scHCT4IIN0o
>There's nothing particularly special about it other than it being an explicit choice

Yes, this is what I meant. Go is explicitly designed according to the philosophy that it is beneficial overall for every type to have a default zero value. You may disagree with this, but if you find you are constantly fighting zero initialization, you should probably just use a different programming language.

>Valid doesn't mean correct.

I understand that. However, in most cases, you can arrange for zero to be a valid value. It may require a little creativity, but it's rare for it to be impossible in my experience.

As to packages, I still don't see the issue. The related types can be in subpackages of a parent package. And as you say, it's simple to create packages.

>So at the end of the day, people don't do it and instead elect to be "more careful", which isn't a good method of preventing bugs.

I don't think this choice has anything to do with the overhead of packages. Most people just don't like the style of 'bondage and discipline' coding where the type system is maximally exploited to enforce every possible invariant. Again, this is just fundamental to Go. It was designed by people who have explicitly said that they don't see value in using the type system this way.

By the way, I am no stranger to the possibilities in this space, having been paid to write Haskell code for a while. I've even done absurd things with the type system like this: https://adrummond.net/posts/cooper However, I tend to think the Go folks are right on this. It's good to have a basic type system, but there are rapidly diminishing returns on the fancier stuff.
Solar panels are money printers. Yet no company is offering to put them on my roof at their cost.
Routing is indeed another pain point especially with internationalisation and having multiple dynamic/translated paths to the same page. My issue with data fetching is about the depreciation of getInitialProps() without a good alternative in place: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/10874
I need a single place to load site translations, user data and what not, preferably without refetching this data on each page transition.

I also briefly looked at Remix and love the routing, but do not necessarily want Remix to dictate how I mutate my data.
> prelegeri

Sorry, I’m having trouble tracking down this term. Could you tell me what it means or what it means in this context?
Pretty much this. Places like Parts-express have been creeping more upmarket with their own brands like Dayton Audio to fill some of the gap, but they are still more downmarket hobbyist niche and probably won't ever be in mass market stores. The same thing that happened to cameras being replaced by good enough phones happened to stereos, just with soundbar/box type appliances.
Does this apply to Toyota as well?
Check this out from a couple weeks ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31214599 - "Ask HN: What's on your learning list?" Might be some good suggestions in there.
I assume you're alluding to bitcoin cash. I don't see what it has to do with any of this, given that the aggregate transaction fees are not enough for big fish like the ones my article to migrate to at scale.
Rest assured, I don't condemn you. But given what you've said about the experience, I would have judged you as unfit to employ in that moment. I'm curious about your focus on the HR person's history taking anger management classes: do you think that your own anger could be better managed?
Yes, that's because Bleach, released by Sub Pop, is the only Nirvana album that's indie. The others were released by DGC Records.
Look for USP certification.

My understanding is that it's voluntary, but the equivalent of the QC that prescription medications undergo.
>The main reason is that almost all content online comes from people who are mentally ill.

I wasn’t brave enough to say this, but since you have, I want to agree. Gaming, Discord, forums, etc - filled to the brink with mentally ill individuals.
I can't currently link to it but this reminded me of that Mark Rober series of videos about squirrels.
I think there’s a Smalltalk implementation that tries to do something like that.
There is arbitrage. It's possible that a hardware company might be located where electricity is expensive, or in an unfavorable regulatory or tax jurisdiction, such that they wouldn't directly profit from running the mining equipment, but someone in a better environment could. But yeah, this would be a small minority of situations.
My guess is that if you had a really big, wide-ranging and high-quality corpus of a completely unknown human language then you probably would be able to decipher and translate it. If you could deduce or guess the grammatical structure the next step might be to look at which nouns can be subjects of which verbs, for example, and it might then be possible to guess which nouns refer to humans and which verbs describe actions that can normally only be performed by a human, and then ... well, there's lots of statistical stuff you can do with a really huge corpus ... It's an interesting problem to think about but it's not a problem we're ever likely to encounter in real life. It's more likely we'll discover a corpus of some alien, non-human language than a huge corpus of a completely unknown human language.
Is there a good way to combine Scrapy framework (retry, rate limiting,..) with a headless browser such as selenium (to get full js-loaded client-side data)?

When I had to do it I ended up duplicating each page request twice. Once for scrapy and once again with selenium.
And therefor perjorative, victim-shaming language is just the way it has to be?
Yes, I read that one, but still didn't understand what will change in code generation due to it. If it's about the read on the consumer side not being reordered after the commit, then I assumed the release on the atomic will take care of it. Maybe I'll throw it into godbolt later on to figure out.
Ryujinx Progress Report April 2022
And what exactly are they going to sell without the software engineer to build it? I understand the role of sales (even if the vast majority I've had to work with are seedy/liars) and you can flip my statement to say "Well without a sales person it doesn't get sold and the software is effectively useless". I get that, both are needed. That said, the sales position shouldn't bring in multiples of what the engineering position does.

I full understand that's not the way things are done today, I also think we do things pretty terribly today.

Maybe a better way to phrase it is "I refuse to accept that they (CEO) are somehow worth so much more to the company compared to the people that actually do the work", "Smarter" was a bad word to use originally.
You can be as right as you want once they hang up.
You wouldn't need full screen mode if you could hide all window decorations.
I wonder how much time went into making it from start to finish. Anyone have a sense of that?
Soupault 4.0.0: as extensible as Jekyll, still statically linked
The one thing I don't really get is why, pi's everywhere? Most of the times an esp32 will be more than enough for a few sensors. No need to be running a full OS and the added benefit they are actually available right now to buy.
Pretty good argument that those who work from home have carbon budget for two mining rigs without being worse than a dual-car household.

Go get your mining rig, my dude. The median number of cars in American households is 1.88 so you have lots of room to play.
DevOps for Application Developers
> This doesn't answer the question in the article tho. The question isn't "Who has the rights to a copy of my medical images". It's "Who owns the copyright to my medical images".

Yes, but that's kind of the point .... the blog post was asking the wrong question.

In the context of the blog post, "but copyright" is BS and the staff member should have been pulled up on it.

Reason ? GDPR. In Europe access to "personally identifiable information" is basically a god given right, saying "no" is not an option. Therefore ..... X-Ray linked to Patient Record = clearly PII = access granted. End of story.

The providing entity has the right to charge a limited fee for "admin" but that's it.

ALSO From a legal perspective, what contract the provider has signed with the equipment manufacturer is IRRELEVANT. The patient's legal relationship is with the healthcare provider. The onus is on the healthcare provider to ensure they are covered downstream for GDPR release, but lack of downstream coverage IS NOT an excuse to withhold GDPR release.
It's twigging to differences in the input data. Whether it's how the forehead is arranged, the chin, eye sockets, cheekbones, ... There is something or a set of something that is correlated with race that's being picked up. If it's whole body, maybe it's height, leg length/pattern, whatever.
The sad thing is how little it improved

Lotus tried to re-think spreadsheets with a product called Improv - it was full of good ideas but the product never took off. The product launched on NeXTSTEP in 1991 and then on Windows in 1993.

Here's a 1990 sales video (low-resolution) from Lotus explaining how it works, and how it differs from traditional spreadsheets: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgGmKD87U3M
> Lead developer behind Dead Man’s Snitch here :wave:

Class! ;)
The difficulty isn't in making a scraper for a single site, but rather in the general case.

That is, making a scraper that can be pointed at an arbitrary site not known at the time of development.
Then why isnt bcash or bsv more valuable than bitcoin?
Organizing tech workers can take any number of forms- I'm partial to the idea of simply strengthening the IEEE/ACM to something akin to the AMA for doctors or APA for psychologists in some capacities. But the main point is that this profession has taken its perks and relative labor power for granted in the past decade, and now that the good times might be ending, we will all soon see what happens when we are without the luxury of a bull market. Perhaps it would have been prudent to have gotten a lot of this codified prior with the leverage that a union or a professional association accords. It's a very "the grasshopper and the ant" situation.
Tether is popular because it was the first stablecoin by several years (e.g. Tether launched in 2014, USDC launched in 2018). Much like Bitcoin, Tether isn't a particularly good product nowadays if you look at its fundamental properties - most of its usefulness comes from its extrinsic properties such as liquidity and demand. However, much like Bitcoin, due to its very early launch, Tether became an early schelling point that has gathered significant liquidity/usage due to network effect (liquidity begets liquidity).

TerraUSD (UST) was hyped up and became popular mainly because the network paid 20% APY interest on UST deposits, which is a way higher rate on a "stablecoin" than you can get anywhere else (rates in much safer protocols are about 5-8% right now). Obviously a 20% interest rate is unsustainable when it's supported by money printed from thin air. But people were either unaware of this (unsophisticated investors), chose to overlook it (calculated risk-takers, RIP), or positioned themselves to be able to find a chair right before the music stopped (institutional investors like Celsius).
I had nothing to do with it...:-)
It takes away a lot of things a slacker could do (like run errands, do hobbies) instead of work. And makes it more obvious when you’re not working
- I think people are more likely to be polite in person (perhaps it is more obvious that retaliation might happen or perhaps it is just being socialised to different norms).

- In person, I think people are more likely to ‘fill the space’ in small groups and so the average thing that is said is low-entropy and polite whereas online (at least here) there is more of an attitude of only contributing when you have something to say and I think on average it is easier to have something to say that is critical than positive (and often there may be many unique seeming criticisms and fewer positive things even if the latter should carry more weight). In large groups where it is more likely that critical opinions may exist, I think people are just less likely to speak up in the real world.

- there may be more criticism online but that doesn’t mean the feedback is good online or in the real world. I think it’s very hard to tell apart the useful (ie good) feedback from the useless.
They sell NOW supplements in half pound bottles for $6-8. Works for me and lasts a very long time. Much cheaper than the acid blends at brew shops too. I'd have no use for a kilo.
Anyone claiming "surely every language needs X" had better look at Riau Indonesian (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riau#Language) first to check if that language has X. If it doesn't, then X is almost certainly not required for communication.
100 gets you roughly a 90% confidence level w/ an 8 point margin of error. Not very good.
Basically the concept of rPython is you write your interpreter in rPython you get a jit for “free”. However your target language doesn’t have to be Python.

A list of rPython projects is here: https://rpython.readthedocs.io/en/latest/examples.html

I suppose you could do something similar like writing your interpreter in luaJIT. It’s not clear if rPython is doing anything special to enable jit in the target language but it is designed for this purpose.
It all comes down to demand I guess... Most people seem to like Beats headphones or think their Airpods have top quality sound and don't care that $200 headphones exist that blow them out of the water. Most people use bluetooth with low quality codecs that distort the sound. In addition, most people listen to their music on streaming services that compress the heck out of tracks that are already heavily (dynamic range) compressed. So it's a case of (a) people never having been exposed to "hi-fi" and (b) people ceasing to care/being willing to sacrifice audio quality (which is heavily subjective anyway) for convenience. So it is the same as phone cameras, people are willing to sacrifice image quality and control for the convenience of having a camera in their pocket all the time.

I personally care about audio to a reasonable degree, but I also think that AVRs in their current form are a weird mix of "too much" and "not enough". I wanted to have a 5.1.2 system that wasn't a soundbar with tiny, tinny speakers that bounce off the ceiling and a tiny sub that moves hardly any air. But in order to drive decent speakers you need a decent amp. But in order to get a decent amp you have to buy a unit that has a million connectors, spatial audio processing, etc. Out of the gigantic array of connectors on the back of my AVR, (7 HDMI ports, phono plugs, component, composite) I am currently using 3 HDMI ports because I play most media off an HTPC anyway. I feel like I'm using less than 30% of what it has to offer, and there is a growing divide between people who want convenience and people who want uncompromising quality at any cost, so low end AVRs aren't much better than a soundbar, and high end AVRs aren't affordable for the average consumer.
> So...assume the most extreme views are correct and start forming our own personal thoughts based on this assumption

This mis-represents what I said.

This thread started with "how to disagree without being accused of being bigoted."

You can form your beliefs however you like. That's a different situation than being in conversation with another person. If you "respond" to someone in a way that does not acknowledge the content of what they said, they may reasonably accuse you of not taking them seriously. There are many reasons to not take someone seriously - including having bigoted views. If you want to avoid being accused of being bigoted, I find it helps to acknowledge (even to just say you don't buy them) even the most extreme views of someone in a vulnerable population. It is polite and it keeps you in conversation with the other person.

If you don't want to be in conversation with someone then, of course, you don't need to acknowledge what they say - but they may be upset with you and accuse you of bias. That's just...life.

I think it's good practice to be skeptical of the views held by powerful people and give more slack to more marginal views I find less credible, but that's a personal belief and it has limits.

> I have yet to see a satisfying definition for this sense of the word "erasing". As best I can tell, it's just an emphatic way of saying "disagreeing with a position of personal importance to X".

It's choosing to make a public statement on an issue in a way that leaves out ('erases') something that an impacted group thinks. How big a deal that is depends on the groups involved and the seriousness of the topic.

For example, when okareaman said "[t]he world won't stop saying negative things about people like me and I accept that" they are implying that trans people are upset about people saying negative things. That is probably true - but that's not the complaint about Chapelle's jokes. By pretending that the complaint is simpler (and focused on personal preference rather than an environment of violence and criminalizing of trans identity) - they 'erase' those complaints in how they discuss it. Another example could be when people ignore the different economic conditions that Millennials and Baby Boomers face and complain that any lack of Millennial success is due to personal flaws. We could talk about more extreme examples, but I hope this makes what I mean clearer.
But with your setup, the 2 VPS are still traceable to you (ie. via payment information). You can go through some extra effort to avoid this (eg. buying the VPS over tor and paying using crypto), but I'm guessing you're not currently doing this. Moreover, the 2 VPS are still carrying only your traffic, which makes logging/correlation attacks easier. With apple's solution, your traffic is mixed with others, and the second hop has no idea who you are.
The only bad faith argument I've ever seen on HN is calling any argument you disagree with and can't refute a "bad-faith argument".
Sounds like a pretty clever startup idea. Consumer Reports, but for everything. Then a seal that manufacturers can put on their product that certifies the assay of ingredients. Does a Coke actually have 120 calories? Is a Vitamin actually what it says? Is the bottle actually recycled? Consumer Reports is often opinion based with some quantitative data and they don’t review everything. Is you olive oil actually from Italian olives? Are those organic pears actually organic? Products that get “the seal” can market that fact. And if consumers care enough, they’ll pick products that are certified to be what they say they are. If I am buying high end paint, the water content matters to me for example.

The FDA should really focus entirely on consumer safety only. (It’s not a safety issue if your olive oil is Moroccan rather than Spanish or whatever.) And the FDA doesn’t have any mission to test if that 18/10 stainless steel sink is actually 18/10 stainless for example.
What about the marginal cost of each CD, a technicians time to burn it and the extra time for a patient to receive their images in a CD before they can share it with other providers? I went through this problem trying to get the X-rays for my grandma that got COVID.
No, not all cars, sure, but like, the vast, vast majority of 'em.

You're still ignoring the practical for the theoretical.
This is iOS. I haven't been able to find the ability to lower the minimum volume, and based on posts in the support forums, this seems like a common complaint that has yet to be addressed by Apple. That said, if you happen to know something that I don't, I'd be delighted to hear it.
This is literally how all construction materials are vetted and it works great.

Underwriters Laboratories.

If it were feasible to sue retailers for damages due to fraudulent vitamins, approximately 0% of supplements sold would be fake.

The problem is there isn’t adequate scientific evidence to back the efficacy of any of these supplement which is why they aren’t regulated in the first place.
You can use something like scrapy-playwright[0] to run a headless browser framework as your download handler. I think there are versions for some of the other headless systems, if you prefer those.

[0] https://github.com/scrapy-plugins/scrapy-playwright
The post makes this exact point actually, so seems the author agrees.
Well since I posted that link to Bicep Glue yesterday, right now its been viewed 10,202 times!

I have noticed for a few years now, sometimes websites are inaccessible with a direct click like in this situation but become accessible when a search engine results link to wherever is clicked on.
But doesn't the brand itself have value outside of Japan? When liquidating the company, why not license it to another manufacturer?
Why wouldn't fees go all the way to zero? Zero times a zillion transactions is still zero.
Unless you impose intrusive restrictions or surveillance on internet browsing, it doesn't really do enough to combat slack, and just antagonizes slackers further.
> This would never happen with a macOS update, which uses an immutable root file system and APFS containers to switch the root after an update.

Hehe, oh yes you can still have data loss on macOS. See the recent article about how macOS SSDs use write-cache enabled.
But you make it seem as if it’s a done tale, as if there were no bad actors, no companies set to profit from selling their own “Layer 2” solutions, no censorship, etc. Reality is, even if the whole planet (not only the 99% of the community you claim) were set on a broken vehicle which they can barely drive but just speculate on, it won’t be long before most realize that this is just that, a broken vehicle meant for speculation and has nothing to do with peer to peer electronic cash, you know, Bitcoin.

So when you discuss miners, on a network DESIGNED to emit less Bitcoin and change to transaction fees down the line, it’s ultra important to note that this actually working vehicle exists and the same miners protecting the speculative vehicle are also protecting the working one. And when calculating for the working one, miners are set to be some of the richest businesses on the planet, even when ALL Bitcoin has been already mined, a 100 years from now.
can someone point me to the reason why this open-sourcing only covers the newest generation(s) of hardware?
I’d agree that it’s in the top 3 non-kernel/os pieces of software. The part it plays in finance, accounting, and engineering is staggering.